Gift certificate and gift cards have become increasingly popular gifts at holiday time, but consumers should be aware that many come with hidden fees and may have a limited life span.
Massachusetts and Connecticut are taking a chain of shopping malls to court. The states have filed suit against Simon Malls, charging the national mall chain is selling gift cards that violate state consumer protection laws.
"These 'gift cards' are riddled with additional charges that Massachusetts consumers should not have to pay," Massachsetts Attorney General Tom Reilly said. "Despite the name, these gift cards are not what they seem."
Reilly said the cards violate the Massachusetts Gift Certificate law, which requires that gift cards be redeemable at full face value for seven years.
"Simon says - but Simon Property fails to tell the truth, when it subtracts $2.50 a month from consumer gift cards six months or older," Connecticut Attorney General Richard Blumenthal said. "Simon illegally picks its customers' pockets to reactivate cards with unused balances."
"Card purchasers intend to give a gift to friends or loved ones, not to an already wealthy mall owner. State law - as well as logic and fairness - demand that gift cards retain their value just like dollars in a drawer," Blumenthal said.
In the Massachusetts lawsuit, Reilly charges that Simon Malls imposes a one-year expiration date on its cards and charges consumers numerous fees that significantly reduce the value of the card before it expires. Those charges include a $2.50 dormancy fee that Simon automatically charges after the card has been held for six months, an initial fee to purchase the card, and fees for checking the card's balance or transferring the balance to another card.
While the state gift certificate law requires gift cards to be redeemable at full face value for seven years, a Simon Gift Card with a $25 face value is worth only $12.50 after the eleventh month, and would expire - be worth nothing at all - after one year.
The lawsuit alleges that these gift cards are subject to Massachusetts law, and not immune from state enforcement under the National Bank Act because they are not a bank product, as Simon Malls contends in a recent lawsuit. Reilly also alleges that Simon Malls does not sufficiently disclose fees connected with the card before consumers purchase them.
Connecticut's suit charges Simon is illegally imposing expiration dates on gift cards and charging fees on unused balances. The suit also charges that Simon fails to properly inform customers of two additional fees: a 50-cent charge to check the card balance and a $5 fee to replace a stolen or lost card.
Simon Property Group is based in Indiana and owns and operates regional malls throughout the United States, including 14 in Massachusetts.
