Complain about a product or service

Merck Agrees to Pay $58 Million to Settle Vioxx Claims

States accused drugmaker of false marketing

May 20, 2008 

The multi-state investigation revealed that Merck improperly marketed and promoted Vioxx, a “Cox 2-inhibitor” drug. The states charged Merck with marketing Vioxx as a pain killer, despite its knowledge that Vioxx carried major health risks.

The company finally pulled the drug from the market in 2004 after Vioxx-related health risks were made public.

“Merck’s aggressive television advertising convinced hundreds of thousands of consumers to seek Vioxx prescriptions before the drug’s risk were fully understood,” said California Attorney General Edmund G. Brown Jr. “Today’s groundbreaking settlement prevents Merck from releasing new television drug advertisements without obtaining federal approval.”

Merck must now submit all television advertising to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for review and pre-clearance. Any FDA comments about the proposed drug commercials must be considered by Merck before the commercials are aired publicly.

Under the agreement, the FDA can delay the launch of Merck’s pain killer product commercials if the federal regulatory agency needs additional time to complete its review.

The settlement prohibits Merck from presenting misleading scientific data to physicians, and bars the manufacturer from using pro-Merck “ghost writers” to author articles and medical studies. Merck is also prohibited from using “promotional speakers” at continuing medical education events if the speakers’ relationship with the company presents a conflict of interest.

The state of Texas has an active Vioxx-related case in Travis County District Court.

In that 2005 case, the Attorney General charged Merck with suppressing critical information to physicians, patients and the Texas Medicaid program. According to court documents filed by the state, Merck failed to disclose the health risks associated with Vioxx. During the time period covered by the state’s enforcement action, Texas spent more than $72 million on Vioxx prescriptions for Medicaid recipients.

Other states which participated in today’s settlement include: Arizona, Arkansas, Connecticut, Florida, District of Columbia, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Iowa, Kansas, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Nebraska, Nevada, New Jersey, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oregon, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Vermont, Washington, and Wisconsin.

Report Your Experience
If you've had a bad experience -- or a good one -- with a consumer product or service, we'd like to hear about it. All complaints are reviewed by class action attorneys and are considered for publication on our site. Knowledge is power! Help spread the word. File your consumer report now.

Share		Follow us on Twitter.

Back to the top |