|
|
NEWS
RECALLS
COMPLAINT FORM
SCAM ALERTS
RESOURCES
Small Claims Guide Class Actions Lemon Laws FAQ Newsletters |
|
| Automotive Education Employment Electronics Family Finance Health Homeowners Insurance Pets Shopping Travel |
|
|
|
![]() |
Feds Issue New Identity Theft RecommendationsBut delay enforcement of "red flags" fraud program for businesses |
||||||||
|
By Martin H. Bosworth October 25, 2008
"The SSN is highly valuable for identity thieves because it is often a necessary (if not necessarily sufficient) item of information that a thief needs to open new accounts in the victim's name," the task force wrote. "One of the most practical and cost-effective ways to prevent breaches is to collect and maintain sensitive data only when it is necessary to do so." The Task Force recommended that the government's Office of Personnel Management (OPM) take the lead in reviewing how federal agencies use Social Security numbers and issuing new recommendations for reducing or eliminating their use in everyday paperwork. In addition, the task force reported that OPM has been working with the Social Security Administration (SSA) to conduct studies on the feasibility of replacing a Social Security number with a new unique identifier for all federal employees. The task force also reported progress on working with state and local governments to reduce or eliminate usage of Social Security numbers as an identifier for their daily business. The ID "passport"The task force also focused on its efforts to improve restitution and aid for victims of identity theft, for whom it takes an average of 600 hours and $6,000 to get any damage to their identities fixed. The chief recommendation was widespread adoption of a "passport" document for victims to use in order to verify their identities while disputing or investigating charges of identity theft. The Justice Department has launched a pilot "passport" program in Ohio, where victims enter their information into a statewide database that is shared with other law enforcement agencies, in order to reduce additional fraud and enable the victim to more easily go about their business. The Task Force also recommended extending partnership with lawyers and legal aid services on both the state and federal levels to get victims of identity theft more legal representation in order to gain restitution. Law enforcementThe Task Force reported that in 2007, 2,470 suspected identity thieves or fraudsters were charged with crimes relating to identity theft, and 1,943 were convicted, up from 1,534 in 2006. Among those indicted were ll members of the hacker ring charged with stealing 40 million credit and debit card numbers from the TJX company and its affiliates, considered the biggest data breach in history. The Justice Department also reported progress in identifying and prosecuting criminal groups that traffic in the "underground economy" of stolen credit cards and personal information, including members of the "Shadowcrew" identity theft cartel. Lowering the red flagThe Task Force acknowledged that the private sector's usage of personally identifying information constitutes a potential security risk, and recommended increased education and training for companies on how to better handle the data they collect. At the same time, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), which is part of the Task Force, announced that it would be delaying implementation of the "red flags rules" for businesses to implement identity theft protection plans until May 1, 2009. Under the "red flags rules," financial institutions and business entities that offer credit or services provided through credit were required to develop and implement plans to protect their customers' data from identity theft and better identify potential fraudulent transactions. Businesses covered by the rules included banks, mortgage lenders, telecommunications companies, auto dealerships, and many others. The rules, which were passed in 2003 as part of the Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act (FACTA), were not scheduled for implementation until January 2008, and full implementation was originally delayed until November 2008. The FTC said that because many businesses that are not covered by FTC jurisdiction did not know they were affected by the rules, they would not be able to comply with the deadline quickly enough. "These entities indicated that they were not aware that they were engaged in activities that would cause them to fall under the FACT Act's definition of creditor or financial institution," the agency said. "The Commission's delay of enforcement will enable these entities sufficient time to establish and implement appropriate identity theft prevention programs, in compliance with the Rule." Report Your Experience
|
||||||||
Back to the top | |
|||||||||
Advertisement
|
|
Custom Search
|
||||
|
AUTOMOTIVE Dealers Manufacturers Service Extended Warranties Lemon Laws Recalls Tires Transporters FAMILY Aging Children, Parenting Recalls Dating Education Entertainment Pets Weddings |
FINANCE Annuities Banks Credit Cards Debt Collection Debt Counseling Insurance Investing Loans Mortgages Payday Loans Student Loans Tax Prep HEALTH Doctors Drugs, Pharmacies Health Clubs Hearing Care Hospitals Nursing Homes Nutrition, Diets Vision Care Weight Loss |
HOUSE & HOME Appliances Cookware Furniture Home Improvements Lawn & Garden Movers Pools & Spas Realtors, Rental Agents Recalls Utilities ELECTRONICS Cable TV/DBS Cameras Cell Phones Computers Home Electronics Internet Access Local Phone Service Long Distance VoIP |
SHOPPING In-Home Online Retail Stores Sporting Goods Supermarkets Telemarketers TRAVEL Airlines Bus Lines Car Rental Cruises Hotels Travel Agents Trains RESOURCES Class Actions Complaint Form Small Claims Guide Lemon Laws |
CONSUMER NEWS Latest News Automotive Telecom Financial Health Homeowners Scams Seniors Travel More ... RECALLS Automotive Children's Products Drugs Food Household Products Sporting Goods ABOUT US FAQ Privacy Policy Advertise With Us Newsroom Syndication Terms of Use |
Terms of Use Your use of this site constitutes acceptance of the Terms of Use
Copyright © 2010 ConsumerAffairs.com Inc. All Rights Reserved. The contents of this site may not be republished, reprinted, rewritten or recirculated without written permission. |
|