|
|
NEWS
RECALLS
COMPLAINT FORM
SCAM ALERTS
RESOURCES
Small Claims Guide Class Actions Lemon Laws FAQ Newsletters |
| Automotive Education Employment Electronics Family Finance Health Homeowners Pets Shopping Travel |
|
|
![]() |
Rep. Frank Promises Hearings On Credit BureasConsumers Complain of Delays in Correcting, Updating Credit Reports |
||||||||||||||
|
By Martin H. Bosworth January 1, 2007
Frank, the incoming chairman of the House Financial Services Committee, says he will hold hearings in 2007 on how the credit bureaus can improve their reporting and error-correcting procedures. ConsumerAffairs.com receives a constant stream of complaints from irate customers regarding credit bureaus' inability -- or unwillingness -- to protect the personal information of the very people they claim to assist. "It took me over three months of letters, emails and calls to no avail," said Georgia of Lodi NJ in a recent complaint to ConsumerAffairs.com. "The workers at Experian read from script and do NOTHING to help one out. "They've listed accounts that have been closed since 1998 and have inaccurate addresses on my credit report. My credit is as pristine as possible and would like to keep it that way, but cannot trust Experian," she said. Rep. Frank's pledge followed a Boston Globe article spotlighting the difficulties consumers have in trying to correct mistakes in their credit reports. "We will have some hearings about how to fix this," Frank told the Globe. He said that laws mandating free credit reports for all Americans were not enough, especially if the procedures to correct errors were difficult and time-consuming. Frank and his Senate counterpart, Christopher Dodd (D-Conn.), incoming chairman of the Senate Banking Committee, have already promised to target the mortgage industry and pass new protections against predatory lending. Profiting From FearErrors in credit reporting can cost consumers jobs and loans, as well as leading to identity theft and fraud. Each of the three credit bureaus -- Experian, Equifax, and Trans Union -- has a laborious process for correcting errors that requires sending extensive documentation to prove the information is inaccurate or out of date. The credit agencies generally blame the lenders for reporting inaccurate data, and for only reporting negative information, such as delinquencies, bankruptcies, or liens. But the sale of credit reports continues to be a billion-dollar business for the credit bureaus, which collect buy information from lenders and sell it cheaply to lenders and other business clients while charging consumers three or four times as much to view their own information. Consumers can spend years and thousands of dollars trying to clean up innaccurate credit reports, even those that are mixed up with others' information, being denied jobs, loans, and places to live all the while. Worse yet, the "fraud monitoring" services credit agencies offer to protect against identity theft often don't work. They don't detect Social Security number theft, for example, which leads only to a new file being opened under the new account holder's name. The three major credit bureaus -- Equifax, Experian, and Trans Union -- all offer comprehensive, and expensive, "identity protection" packages, which claim to insure the user from damages incurred by misuse of their personal data and issue notifications of fraud to creditors and other agencies who view consumers' credit on a regular basis.Yet many Americans find themselves threatened with collection or unable to obtain credit due to a credit bureau's mistakes. The major CRA's consistently fail to report accurate information, change credit ratings based on erroneous data, and often "mix up" customers' information, resulting in innocent consumers being harrassed or penalized for actions they did not commit. Moreover, as Consumers Union pointed out in 2005, "When a company improperly breaches a consumer's sensitive information, the onus is on that consumer -- the victim -- to fix the problem." Customers have to contact the credit bureau and attempt to prove that they were not responsible for the actions committed using their identity, a process made more difficult by the lack of direct contact options most credit bureaus provide. A recent New York Times article detailed the failings of credit monitoring services, including the admission by credit agency spokespersons that they fail to detect SSN-based fraud, even as credit monitoring rakes in $900 million a year for the agencies that offer it. Report Your Experience
|
|
|||||||||||||
Back to the top | |
|||||||||||||||
Advertisement
|
|
Custom Search
|
||||
Terms of Use Your use of this site constitutes acceptance of the Terms of Use
Copyright © 2003-2009 ConsumerAffairs.com Inc. All Rights Reserved. The contents of this site may not be republished, reprinted, rewritten or recirculated without written permission. |
|