Current Events in July 2025

Browse Current Events by year

2025

Browse Current Events by month

Get trending consumer news and recalls

    By entering your email, you agree to sign up for consumer news, tips and giveaways from ConsumerAffairs. Unsubscribe at any time.

    Thanks for subscribing.

    You have successfully subscribed to our newsletter! Enjoy reading our tips and recommendations.

    Trump-Era CFPB under fire as $360 million in consumer redress goes missing or reversed

    Corporations being forgiven without any due process or transparency, groups charge

    • $120 million in redress returned to companies that broke the law

    • Hundreds of millions more in restitution stalled or at risk

    • Watchdog groups accuse CFPB of abandoning enforcement and transparency


    More than $360 million in compensation owed to Americans harmed by illegal financial practices is at risk due to actions taken by the Trump-appointed leadership of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB), according to a new investigation by the Consumer Federation of America (CFA) and the Student Borrower Protection Center (SBPC).

    The investigation reveals that over $120 million in redress has already been clawed back from victims and returned to the same corporations found to have broken the law. Additionally, hundreds of millions more remain in limbo or face cancellation as the CFPB under acting director Russell Vought has rolled back enforcement and reduced transparency.

    “Corporate pardons” and dropped cases

    The CFPB, once seen as a bulwark against financial abuse, has seen a dramatic shift under the Trump administration’s influence. The agency has dropped at least 22 pending enforcement cases this year, including several involving significant harm to military service members, student borrowers, and auto loan holders.

    “In case after case, the Trump CFPB has taken the side of Wall Street over working families,” said Eric Halperin, senior fellow at CFA. “The agency’s job is to protect Americans—not to offer a laundry list of corporate pardons.”

    Among the findings: in three separate enforcement cases, the CFPB withdrew from settlements that would have delivered more than $120 million in redress to affected consumers. In each of those cases, the companies were explicitly relieved of any obligation to pay restitution. In a fourth case, the financial penalty was dramatically reduced with little explanation.

    Redress in limbo: CashApp, Navient, Honda

    The fate of hundreds of millions more in consumer restitution remains uncertain. Investigators highlight at least three major enforcement actions where large payouts have either stalled or face derailment:

    • CashApp (Block Inc.): As much as $120 million in consumer refunds are owed but remain unpaid.

    • Navient: Over $100 million in redress for student loan borrowers appears stuck in administrative purgatory.

    • American Honda Finance: More than $10 million in relief has yet to reach harmed auto loan customers.

    All of these enforcement actions were finalized in 2024 but are now at risk due to the CFPB’s abrupt policy shifts under Vought’s leadership.

    “When Americans got ripped off by big banks and other financial companies, they could count on the CFPB to take action—until now,” said Allison Preiss of the SBPC. “Today, Wall Street wrongdoers are being richly rewarded while regular Americans are left empty-handed.”

    A Transparency Breakdown

    The CFA-SBPC report also slams the CFPB for abandoning long-standing transparency practices. Since 2011, the agency has published quarterly reports detailing enforcement activity, penalties collected, and disbursement of funds to victims. Those reports have traditionally been posted within three months of each fiscal quarter.

    But since January 5, 2025, the CFPB has failed to publish a single report, breaking with more than a decade of precedent. Watchdogs say this lack of transparency makes it harder for consumers and policymakers to track whether restitution is being delivered—or quietly abandoned.

    “This isn’t just about policy differences,” said Halperin. “It’s about basic accountability and honoring the promises made to Americans who’ve already been harmed.”

    $120 million in redress returned to companies that broke the law Hundreds of millions more in restitution stalled or at risk Watchdog group...

    Get trending consumer news and recalls

      By entering your email, you agree to sign up for consumer news, tips and giveaways from ConsumerAffairs. Unsubscribe at any time.

      Thanks for subscribing.

      You have successfully subscribed to our newsletter! Enjoy reading our tips and recommendations.

      Exposure to ‘forever chemicals’ could increase the risk of type 2 diabetes, study finds

      Chemical exposure may have more risks than many consumers anticipated

      • Blood levels of PFAS (“forever chemicals”) were linked to about a 31 % increased future risk of type 2 diabetes.

      • The study compared 180 newly diagnosed diabetes cases with 180 matched non‑diabetic controls from Mount Sinai’s BioMe cohort.

      • Metabolic disruptions in amino-acid and drug-processing pathways may offer clues to how PFAS interfere with blood sugar regulation.


      Per‑ and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), or “forever chemicals,” have gotten a lot of attention recently for the plethora of health risks associated with them. 

      Now, a new study from Mount Sinai suggests that PFAS exposure may quietly raise your risk of developing type 2 diabetes.

      “PFAS are synthetic chemicals that resist heat, oil, water, and stains, and are found in countless everyday consumer products,” researcher Vishal Midya, Ph.D., M.Stat., said in a news release. 

      “Because they don’t break down easily, PFAS accumulate in the environment — and in human bodies. Our study is one of the first to examine how these chemicals may disrupt the body’s metabolism in ways that increase diabetes risk — particularly in diverse U.S. populations.” 

      The study

      The research team conducted the study using BioMe, a health‑record linked biobank that has enrolled over 70,000 people at Mount Sinai Hospital since 2007. 

      They selected 180 individuals recently diagnosed with type 2 diabetes and matched them with 180 similar participants (same age, sex, ancestry) who did not have diabetes. 

      Blood samples from all participants were tested for PFAS levels. The researchers then examined how increasing PFAS exposure related to subsequent diabetes risk, while also exploring metabolic signatures in pathways tied to amino‑acid biosynthesis and drug metabolism.

      The results

      The key finding: For each step up in PFAS exposure (e.g. from low to moderate, moderate to high), there was a 31 % higher risk of developing type 2 diabetes later on. 

      While the study can’t prove PFAS causes diabetes directly, it did find signs that PFAS may disrupt critical metabolic processes — specifically amino‑acid biosynthesis and drug metabolism — which are intimately involved in regulating blood sugar.

      “This research leverages an exposomics framework to characterize environmental impacts and associated metabolic alterations contributing to the development of type 2 diabetes in vulnerable U.S. populations,” researcher Damaskini Valvi, M.D., Ph.D., MPH, said in the news release. 

      “These findings can help us design more effective interventions for the early prevention of type 2 diabetes in the future, taking into account individuals’ exposures to environmental chemicals along with other well-known genetic, clinical, and lifestyle factors implicated in diabetes development. Mounting research suggests that PFAS are a risk factor for several chronic diseases, such as obesity, liver disease, and diabetes.” 

      Blood levels of PFAS (“forever chemicals”) were linked to about a 31 % increased future risk of type 2 diabetes.   The study compared 180 newly d...

      Transportation Department backs off effort to require speed limiters on big trucks

      The National Safety Council says the decision will lead to more fatalities on U.S. roads

      • The U.S. Department of Transportation has withdrawn a decades-old rulemaking to require speed limiters on heavy vehicles.

      • The National Safety Council warns the move will lead to more fatalities on U.S. roads.

      • In 2023 alone, speeding killed nearly 12,000 people — and over 5,000 large trucks were involved in fatal crashes.


      The U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT) has officially withdrawn its long-standing effort to require speed-limiting technology on large commercial vehicles, ending more than 20 years of regulatory work aimed at curbing speed-related traffic fatalities.

      The decision, announced by the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA), halts proposed rulemaking that would have mandated the use of speed limiters on multipurpose passenger vehicles, trucks, buses, and school buses weighing more than 26,000 pounds. The aim of the rule was to reduce deadly crashes involving speeding heavy vehicles by leveraging existing technology to cap maximum speeds.

      Lorraine Martin, president and CEO of the National Safety Council (NSC), strongly criticized the move. “USDOT’s research has proven speed-limiting devices save lives, ensuring truckers can perform their jobs and return home safely,” Martin said in a statement. “This is a disappointing rollback of a decades-long effort to reduce speed-related fatalities involving large commercial vehicles. The National Safety Council urges USDOT to reconsider its decision, which will cost lives.”

      Fatal numbers on the rise

      Speeding remains a persistent and deadly problem on U.S. roads, the NSC said. In 2023, it was a factor in 29% of all traffic deaths, claiming the lives of 11,775 people — an average of more than 32 fatalities every day. The stakes are even higher when excess speed is combined with the massive weight of heavy trucks. That year, 5,375 large trucks were involved in fatal crashes, reflecting an 8.4% decrease from 2022 but still a staggering 43% increase compared to a decade ago.

      The withdrawal comes despite government studies showing that speed limiters work. A 2012 FMCSA study of fleet data found that trucks equipped with such devices had significantly lower crash rates. USDOT estimates that capping truck speeds at 65 mph could prevent nearly 5,000 injuries and save over 200 lives each year.

      The National Safety Council, a 110-year-old nonprofit dedicated to eliminating preventable deaths and injuries, emphasized that the science is clear and the technology is already available.

      A step backward?

      Critics argue that USDOT’s reversal undermines public safety, particularly for highway users who share the road with heavy trucks. “This isn’t just about regulation — it’s about protecting families and professional drivers alike,” Martin said.

      As fatalities involving large commercial vehicles trend upward, safety advocates warn that abandoning speed limiter rules now could have deadly consequences in the years to come.

      The U.S. Department of Transportation has withdrawn a decades-old rulemaking to require speed limiters on heavy vehicles. The National Safety Counc...

      Consumers in survival mode as economic pressures mount - KPMG

      Shoppers are cutting back as they fear the effects of inflation and tariffs

      • Nearly 4 in 10 households report lower income; over 70% expect a recession by next year.

      • Shoppers are cutting back across nearly all spending categories, except essentials like groceries and car-related expenses.

      • Tariffs, inflation, and shrinking savings are pushing consumers toward discounts, thrift, and smarter buying choices.


      As summer 2025 winds down, U.S. consumers are facing tough financial decisions, according to KPMG’s latest Consumer Pulse report. With inflation climbing, household incomes shrinking, and renewed fears over tariffs, Americans are spending less, saving less, and thinking twice before making non-essential purchases.

      “This isn’t just belt-tightening — it’s a complete rethink of value,” said Duleep Rodrigo, KPMG’s Consumer and Retail Sector Leader. “Today’s consumer wants purpose behind every dollar spent.”

      The report, based on a survey of over 1,500 consumers, found that 39% of households say their income has dropped, nearly double the number from last summer. At the same time, over 70% believe a recession is coming within the next year, leading to widespread spending cutbacks.

      With tariffs back in the headlines, many consumers blame them for rising prices on food, clothing, electronics, and cars. Nearly 80% expect prices to go even higher, and half say they’re already cutting back or actively looking for deals to manage the impact.

      “Tariffs are no longer background noise — they’re showing up on grocery receipts,” said Heather Rice, KPMG’s Consumer and Retail Tax Leader.

      Smarter, sharper spending

      Consumers aren’t necessarily giving up on spending — they’re just getting smarter. The report shows a shift toward value-first behavior:

      • 50% of shoppers are cutting back overall

      • 49% are chasing discounts and promotions

      • Thrift store apparel spending is up 2%

      • Fast food visits are up 26%, while casual dining is down 38%

      Only two categories are seeing growth: groceries and automotive.

      “Consumers are still buying, but they’re buying with purpose,” Rodrigo said. “Relevance, trust, and tangible value are driving decisions.”

      One-trip summer, wellness still a must

      Even as budgets tighten, some spending remains sacred. Nearly 58% still plan summer travel, but they’re spending 7% less per trip and sticking to domestic destinations. It’s a “one trip instead of two” mindset, with restaurants and shopping trimmed to preserve the getaway.

      Health and wellness also remain a priority:

      • Fitness and mental health are top concerns, especially for younger consumers

      • 38% say they’re drinking less alcohol

      • Use of GLP-1 medications for weight loss or health is slowly rising, with 9% currently using them and 6% planning to start

      “Wellness is evolving, not disappearing,” said Julia Wilson, KPMG’s Consumer Strategy Leader. “People are changing habits and focusing on what actually works.”

      Smarter tech use, sharper expectations

      Digitally, shoppers are moving toward direct-to-consumer (D2C) channels for basics like clothing, food, and personal care. They expect secure payments, fast shipping, and hassle-free returns. While social media shopping is growing, skepticism around advertising and data use is high:

      • 43% are uncomfortable with companies using AI to analyze their personal data

      • Only 34% say they’re OK with it

      “Consumers are open to tech — but only if it respects their privacy,” said Sam Ganga, KPMG’s AI and Cloud Leader. “Trust and transparency are make-or-break.”

      The bottom line

      Consumers in 2025 are not just spending less — they’re spending smarter. With shrinking incomes, rising prices, and a looming recession, they’re focused on what matters: value, relevance, and results. Brands that respond with empathy, clarity, and real utility are the ones most likely to survive the shift.

      Nearly 4 in 10 households report lower income; over 70% expect a recession by next year. Shoppers are cutting back across nearly all spending categ...