You have successfully subscribed to our newsletter! Enjoy reading our tips and recommendations.
Huffington Post App Throws Itself at TV
HuffPo hopes its millions of fans will watch with both eyes
The way beetle-browed old-media types see it, if somebody's reading a newspaper, they're not watching TV and vice versa. Well, that as anyone can see, is no longer true and The Huffington Post is working to take advantage of our love for multitasking.
HuffPo has launched an iPad app -- called HuffPost Live -- that offers a mix of entertainment and social interaction. Nothing new about that but the unique feature of this little app is that it can throw itself onto your TV screen by using Apple TV.
So you could be lolling around flipping through The Huffington Post on your iPad with one eye while taking in the video eye candy on your big screen with the other. Even better, as the Huffington Post folks see it, you could be commenting on your iPad on the HuffPost Live platform while watching the video feed on their TV. It's "social TV at its best," a HuffPost spokesperson told us.
HuffPo launched its online TV network in August and is streaming 12 hours of live footage a day from New York and Los Angeles. As anyone in the TV biz will tell you, that is a huge investment, even if the production values are not always right up there with 30 Rock or Breaking Bad.
HuffPo is hoping that all this will even further snag its already super-loyal followers, who help keep the site active with their frantic posting on every topic imaginable, but that soon they'll also start posting video clips of their somersaulting cats, cute babies and amazing culinary creations, thus providing tons of viral content for both HuffPo and its parent, AOL.
You may or may not be a big HuffPo fan but you must admit, this is one audacious strategy. Starched-shirt journalists have dissed HuffPo founder Ariana Huffington, claiming her site is more plagiarism than journalism but if traditional media companies had taken the kinds of chances HuffPo and AOL are taking, maybe they wouldn't be sniveling about how puny their coin stash is looking these days.
The way beetle-browed old-media types see it, if somebody's reading a newspaper, they're not watching TV and vice versa. Well, that as anyone can see, is ...
Lifetime Risk of Heart Disease Is High ... For Everybody
But the real question is: how many healthy, vigorous years do you want?
You may be one of those people who eats the most healthful food imaginable, never gets less than eight hours sleep, runs five miles a day, pumps iron religiously and practices yoga to relax each evening.
So you think your risk of developing heart disease is pretty low? No doubt it is -- at least right now. But a new study finds that the lifetime risk of developing heart disease is high for all of us -- greater than 30 percent for the healthiest among us and more than 50 percent for men and women overall.
The distinction is lifetime risk vs. short-term risk. Sure, the couch potato next door may have a higher risk of having a heart attack or other wake-up call over the next 12 months. This study deals with the risk over an entire lifespan.
It's like the statistic you hear frequently quoted that says one in every eight women will develop breast cancer at some point in their lifetime. It's true but can cause one to have an exaggerated fear of developing the disease tomorrow.
The studyof cardiovascular disease (CVD)appears in the November 7 issue of JAMA andis being released early online to coincide with the American Heart Association’s Scientific Sessions.
No previous data
“To date, there have been no published data on the lifetime risk for total CVD (including coronary heart disease [CHD], atherosclerotic and hemorrhagic stroke, congestive heart failure [CHF], and other CVD death),” according to background information in the article. “Estimates of lifetime risk for total CVD may provide projections of the future population burden of CVD and may assist in clinician-patient risk communication.”
The researchers found that at an index age of 45 years, overall lifetime risk estimates for total CVD through age 95 years were 60.3 percent for men, and 55.6 percent for women. Women had significantly lower lifetime risk estimates than men at all index ages.
Longer survival time free of total CVD was experienced by individuals with optimal risk factor levels when compared with participants with at least 2 major risk factors across all index ages.
“For example, at an index age of 45 years, individuals with optimal risk factor profiles lived up to 14 years longer free of total CVD than individuals with at least 2 risk factors,” the authors write.
The researchers note that “lifetime risks for total CVD were high regardless of index age, indicating that achieving older age free of total CVD does not guarantee escape from remaining lifetime risk for total CVD.” They add that the finding of a substantial lifetime CVD risk even among individuals with an optimal risk factor profile highlights “the large public health burden and opportunities for prevention of total CVD.”
More vigorous years
In other words, a healthful life style may not necessarily buy you more years of life but it may very well buy you a lifetime that includes many more healthy, vigorous years.
The cynics among us are fond of saying that even ultra-marathoners will get old and die. Advocates of risk reduction -- i.e., healthful living -- will answer that, yes, that's true but they will be swimming, running, playing tennis and hoisting grandchildren into the air for 10, 20 or 30 years longer than their peers who contract heart disease, emphysema, diabetes and other chronic diseases in their 40s and 50s.
John T. Wilkins, M.D., M.S., of the Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, and colleagues conducted a study to estimate lifetime risk for total CVD in separate models for men and women overall and by aggregate risk factor burden at index ages of 45, 55, 65, and 75 years.
The study consisted of a pooled survival analysis of data from 1964 through 2008 from five National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute-funded community-based cohorts: Framingham Heart Study, Framingham Offspring Study, Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study, Chicago Heart Association Detection Project in Industry Study, and Cardiovascular Health Study.
Lifetime Risk of Developing Cardiovascular Disease Substantial CHICAGO – Even in men and women with an optimal cardiovascular disease (CVD) ...
Get ready; about half the nation is going to be disappointed
Come Tuesday evening, it will all be over. Finally. The non-stop political ads and, if you live in a swing state, the non-stop robo-calls.
Americans will have gone to the polls and either given Barack Obama another four-year term as President or replaced him with Mitt Romney.
But for many, election day will not just bring closure. It will bring unbridled joy or bitter disappointment because increasingly, Americans hold strong partisan views and take their politics personally.
Dr. Asim Shah, a Harris Health System psychologist, likens this year's election cycle to an emotional roller coaster. Some riders will get off laughing, other will be throwing up. His prescription for the post-election blues? A strong dose of no TV, radio, social media and Internet coverage for a week or two.
“People need to be more accepting and less emotional about the results and realize that, in the short-term the election will not affect them,” said Shah, chief of Psychiatry at Harris Health Ben Taub Hospital and associate professor of the Menninger Department of Psychiatry at Baylor College of Medicine. “If you wake up and go to work or take your child to school the next day, you will still need to do those things as part of your life after the election.”
Emotionally charged politics
It's natural to feel something after an election but Shah notes that politics has become more emotionally charged in recent years with the rise of social media and information outlets that reflect either a liberal or conservative point of view. For those who are more invested in a particular outcome, the results could affect their mental health and well-being.
Shah says emotional reactions are normal and expected, but people with bouts of depression, anger and anxiety that last more than two weeks and cause functional impairments should seek medical care. He warns that people with outbursts tinged with threats of harming oneself or others also should be referred for help.
In 2004, Taiwan faced a hotly contested election. It affected the population greatly, Shah says. Psychiatrists later diagnosed about 10 percent of the population with depression and anxiety and subsequently coined the phrase -- post-election stress syndrome.
Also that year many liberal supporters of Sen. John Kerry (D-MA) became despondent when President Bush won re-election.
“You don’t see a lot of people who are able to accept a decision so quickly that goes against them,” Shah says. “And just telling people on the losing side, ‘Oh don’t worry, everything will be OK,’ doesn’t help. It just might make things worse.”
Coping advice
So, if your guy loses on Tuesday, here's what Shah says you should do:
Turn off all TV, radio and Internet coverage (if necessary, listen only to non-partisan coverage)
Avoid conflict by not bringing up the topic
Change topic when it comes up
Realize that things aren’t changing in the short-term no matter who wins
Concentrate on day-to-day activities that are part of life
In addition, Shah recommends finding some pleasant distractions, like exercising, watching comedies, cooking, gardening or sporting events to distract from politics. But be careful when it comes to comfort food -- that could easily pack on some pounds and increase your depression.
As a general rule, Shah subscribes to the idea of never mixing friendships with any discussions of sensitive topics like politics and religion.
“You save a lot of friendships and relationships that way,” he adds.
Come Tuesday evening, it will all be over. Finally. The non-stop political ads and, if you live in a swing state, the non-stop robo-calls.Americans will ...
You have successfully subscribed to our newsletter! Enjoy reading our tips and recommendations.
West Virginia Sues Law Firm Over its Foreclosure 'Help'
Claims residents are being misled about national foreclosure settlement
Relief has begun to arrive for some homeowners who unjustly lost their homes to foreclosure. In the last few weeks various states have begun handing out checks from the historic $25 billion settlement with lenders signed earlier this year.
But at least one state attorney general who was a party to the settlement is warning that “unscrupulous” companies are now trying to get a piece of the settlement by misleading eligible homeowners.
All benefits under the settlement are free, but West Virginia Attorney General Darrell McGraw says some operators are misleading consumers into thinking they must pay to obtain their checks. McGraw has gone to court to stop one such company, Murray, LLP, from doing so.
Seeks injunction
McGraw’s office sued Texas-based Murray and four individuals in state court, asking the court to issue an injunction blocking Murray from taking 20 percent of consumers’ money as a fee for completing a simple claim form. The suit also seeks to block Murray from charging fees for other alleged services relating to wrongful foreclosures.
"This sort of conduct is unacceptable in West Virginia," said McGraw. "It is my duty to enforce our consumer laws so that consumers, who have already lost their homes, are not victimized again by a group that charges for a service that was designed to be simple and free. Consumers should not be fooled into thinking anyone can advance their claim, because they can’t. Consumers with questions about the National Mortgage Settlement claim process are urged to call my Consumer Protection Hotline for more information. All of our services are free."
Simple one-page form
McGraw says a customized single page claim form was sent out to 5,222 West Virginians who were already determined to be eligible for the expected payment of approximately $1,500 to $2,000. He says the forms are extremely simple and easy to complete. The deadline for claim submission is January 18, 2013. If consumers have questions they can call a toll-free number for help.
But McGraw says that even before the first claim form was sent, the recently created "law firm" Murray LLP, registered in San Antonio, Texas, began marketing its services to foreclosure victims entitled to payment by offering to "push their claim forward" with the settlement administrator for 20 percent of the total payout.
McGraw cites what he calls a sophisticated nationwide advertising scheme on cable television and its Website as the source of confusion. Consumers, he says, get the idea they are hiring a lawyer to file their claim and will gain an advantage in the claims process by doing so.
Meanwhile, McGraw says he has received more foreclosure complaints from the Eastern Panhandle that any other part of the state. He says his office has received more than 800 written complaints requesting help with their home loans as part of a "Save Our Homes" initiative launched earlier this year.
Relief has begun to arrive for some homeowners who unjustly lost their homes to foreclosure. In the last few weeks various states have begun handing out ch...
What you shell out at the hospital is just the beginning
The economic impact of a heart attack and other forms of acute coronary syndrome goes beyond the hospital to the home and workplace.
According to research presented at the American Heart Association's Scientific Sessions 2012, men and women with acute coronary syndrome face additional economic burdens in lost time and income from work and possible inability to return to work.
Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is an umbrella term for situations in which blood supplied to the heart muscle is suddenly blocked. It includes heart attack and angina or chest pain.
Using data from Integrated Benefits Institutes' Health and Productivity Benchmarking Databases and IMS Lifelink, researchers analyzed medical, pharmacy and short- and long-term disability claims to calculate direct and indirect costs for more than 37,000 employees and their dependents from 2007 to 2010. Of the total, 77 percent were men and 95 percent were younger than 65.
Stark economic impact
The researchers found:
Annual healthcare cost for each worker, including out-of-pocket expenses, was $8,170. Of that, $7,545 was for hospitalizations and other medical care and $625 for pharmacy costs.
Workers with ACS lost 60.2 days of work in the short term and 397 days in the long term.
For employers, disability costs outweighed direct costs. The estimated per claim productivity loss for short-term disability was $7,943 and $52,473 for long-term disability.
Hospitalizations accounted for 75 percent of total annual costs.
"ACS can have devastating effects from an economic standpoint on employers in terms of lost productivity, but more importantly on costs to the employee reflected in the average lost time per incident," said Robert L. Page II, Pharm.D., M.S.P.H., the study's lead author. The study is unique because 95 percent of participants were under age 65.
Younger patients
"About 47 percent of all ACS patients are younger than 65, so we were looking at a working class population," said Page, an associate professor of clinical pharmacy and physical medicine and a clinical specialist in the Division of Cardiology at the University of Colorado School of Pharmacy in Aurora, Colo.
ACS has non-cardiac and cardiac complications such as possible structural heart damage or depression.
"We want to target individuals early on in terms of risk factor modification for ACS, including smoking cessation, weight loss, appropriate diet, pharmacotherapy for high cholesterol and high blood pressure," Page said.
The economic impact of a heart attack and other forms of acute coronary syndrome goes beyond the hospital to the home and workplace. According to researc...
Champion Power Equipment of Santa Fe Springs, CA, is recalling about 8,600 portable generators. Fuel can leak from the generator's carburetor, posing a fire hazard.
There have been 11 reports of fuel leaking from the generators, including eight reports of the generators catching fire and two of property damage.
This recall involves two models of Champion Power Equipment portable generators. Both models have a black frame with black and yellow control panels, a bar handle and two wheels.
Model number 41332 has an open frame. The words "Champion Power Equipment" are on the control panel and "8250 starting watts" and "6500 running watts" are on the side of the fuel tank.
Model number 41532 has side panels that cover the long sides of the fuel tank. The words "Champion Power Equipment" are on the side panel above the control panel, and "9000 starting watts" and "7000 running watts" are on the control panel.
The model number and serial number are located on the side of the generator with the handle, on a tag on the crossbar above the yellow generator end cap.
Model Number
Serial Number Ranges
41332
11NOV2600701 to 11NOV2601500
41532
11NOV1400151 to 11NOV1400360
11DEC0700001 to 11DEC0700720
11DEC1301077 to 11DEC1402602
11DEC2201801 to 11DEC2203600
11DEC2501531 to 11DEC2503330
11DEC2801073 to 11DEC2801325
The generators, made in China were sold exclusively at Costco Wholesale stores nationwide from December 2011 through July 2012 for about $699.
Consumers should stop using the recalled generators immediately and contact Champion Power Equipment for a free repair kit to be installed by an authorized dealer. The consumer may also return the unit to Costco for a full refund.
Consumers may contact Champion Power Equipment toll-free at (855) 236-9424, from 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m. PT Monday through Friday or by e-mail at support@cpeauto.com.
Champion Power Equipment of Santa Fe Springs, CA, is recalling about 8,600 portable generators. Fuel can leak from the generator's carburetor, posing a fir...
Wayne Farms of Decatur, AL, is recalling approximately 28,528 pounds of frozen, fully cooked, chicken products because they may contain foreign materials -- pieces of a plastic pen.
The products subject to recall include:
900-lb. combo cases containing thirty, 30-lb. bags of Wayne Farms, FULLY COOKED GRILL MARKED WHITE MEAT CHICKEN STRIPS
The products were produced on Oct. 3, 2012, and bear the USDA mark of inspection and the case codes “372277174001” through “372277254005” on the label. Three combo cases, one each from Sept. 6, 2012, Sept. 19, 2012, and Sept. 24, 2012 are also affected. The products were distributed to a facility in Kentucky for further processing into potential retail products.
The company received complaints from a customer, who discovered the foreign matter while preparing to further process the product. U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS) and the company have received no reports of injury associated with consumption of this product. .
Consumers with questions about the recall should contact Alan Sterling, the company’s director of marketing and communications, at (678) 450-3092.
Wayne Farms of Decatur, AL, is recalling approximately 28,528 pounds of frozen, fully cooked, chicken products because they may contain foreign materials -...
It has the potential to be very secure, report finds
The Internet continues to become mobile, meaning in the future even more consumers will use their smartphones and tablets for online banking. Most banks have already rolled out mobile apps and are encouraging customers to use them.
But how secure are they? A new report from Reportlinker.com suggests mobile banking is fairly secure for now. Its Mobile Banking Security Insight Report suggests the financial services industry will continue to benefit from the immediacy that smart mobile devices (SMDs) offer but there are significant risks that must be counteracted before consumers are confident in accepting them.
Banks like mobile banking because it's good business. Mobile customers are generally young and affluent. In other words, the same people who want the latest gadgets – smartphones and tablets – are the very people the banks want as customers.
Risks
But what are the risks?
“Anyone who has access to your cell phone has access to your identity in a few clicks,” said Elizabeth Baker, an assistant professor at Wake Forest University and an expert in information system security issues. “Often, credit card companies limit your financial responsibility if your card is stolen and fraud is committed. This is not true for your checking and savings bank accounts. Money fraudulently withdrawn can be costly.”
The new report acknowledges this growing risk. It notes that while the current level of risk is probably still lower than using online banking on your PC, criminals are quickly turning their attention to the mobile platform as more consumers start using mobile devices.
“As the mobile device becomes the number one screen for our daily lives it conversely becomes an increased target for malicious activity,” the report finds. “Mobile devices are increasingly being attacked.”
Potential
But the report, compiled by Goode Intelligence, says the mobile banking platform has the potential to be much more secure than your desktop. That's because it can also be used as a security token.
If a consumer registers a specific phone to the bank account the authentication process can be simplified for the user who merely has to enter a private PIN or passcode to prove they are in possession of the registered phone.
At the same time, the report says smart phones have the potential to offer stronger authentication. Geolocation, voice recognition, built-in cameras and fingerprint readers could all be used, if required, to offer additional layers of security when authenticating users.
Seamless security
The report suggests this could all be done seamlessly, so that mobile banking is both secure and convenient for the consumer.
Most importantly, all these extra measures could be added without spoiling the user experience. It means that mobile banking can offer better security and better user convenience at the same time.
To reach that level of security, however, it says banks should create an encrypted communication channel between user and bank. It should then create a security protocol that only allows the registered phone to access the account and ensures that the person using the phone is the registered customer.
That security layer is currently lacking. Experts like Baker worry that smartphone users currently are not taking enough steps to secure their phones with password protections, in the event they are lost or stolen.
The Internet continues to become mobile, meaning in the future even more consumers will uses their smartphones and tablets for online banking. Most banks h...
New Jersey Issues Subpoenas In Price Gouging Probe
State has fielded more than 500 complaints from consumers since Hurricane Sandy
The power is off over wide areas and gasoline remains in short supply as the Northeast enters its second post-Sandy week. In New Jersey, state officials have announced a widespread probe of alleged price gouging.
The New Jersey Division of Consumer Affairs said it has issued subpoenas to 65 businesses across the state, stepping up its investigation into more than 500 consumer complaints about alleged price gouging.
"Having visited some of the hardest-hit areas of our state, and having seen firsthand the suffering people are experiencing, I assure New Jersey's residents and retailers that we are taking a zero-tolerance approach to price gouging," said Governor Chris Christie. "Fuel, electricity, food, and a place to sleep are not luxuries, certainly not for individuals who have been displaced from their homes and in many cases have limited resources at their disposal. We are not asking businesses to function as charities. We require that they obey New Jersey's laws - or pay significant penalties."
The price gouging complaints have rolled in from all sections of the hard-hit state, but are particularly numerous from Bergen, Essex, Middlesex, Monmouth, Ocean, and Passaic counties. The top category of complaints concerns gasoline prices. In some cases stations reportedly raised prices by more than $1 a gallon after the storm.
Gas station violations
The state has also received complaints about gas stations charging more to fill up hand-held canisters than to fill car gas tanks, in apparent violation of state Motor Fuels Act protections related to fuel prices.
While regional oil refineries were spared all but minor damage from the storm, many stations are still without power and cannot pump fuel. Those that are still operating are being overwhelmed, creating temporary supply bottlenecks.
In addition to gasoline, New Jersey officials say they are investigating reports that the price of generators, batteries and propane doubled after the storm. They are also looking into food prices, including reports of unexpectedly high prices at convenience stores and restaurants in certain areas, affecting consumers who are unable to cook a hot meal at home due to power outages.
New Jersey Attorney General Jeffrey Chiesa says his office has deployed 45 investigators around the state and expects the number of subpoenas to exceed 100 by early this week.
The power is off over wide areas and gasoline remains in short supply as the northeast enters its second post-Sandy week. In New Jersey, state officials ha...
Hyundai, Kia Overstated Mileage Claims, Will Compensate Customers
Companies blame "procedural errors" for the misstatements, discovered by the EPA
Hyundai and Kia say they mistakenly overstated the estimated fuel economy on more than 900,000 cars sold in the U.S. over the past two years and will compensate owners for the faulty claims.
A lawsuit filed in July claimed Hyundai misled consumers about the gas mileage of the 2011 and 2012 Elantra, using a high-powered advertising campaign to capitalize on public concern over escalating gas prices.
"I feel like Hyundai took advantage of me. Hyundai's advertisements about the ‘40 MPG’ gas mileage of the Elantra instantly caught my attention. I bought the car thinking I would be seeing major savings at the pump and getting over 500 miles per tank, but Hyundai fooled me," said Louis Bird of Sacramento, a 2011 Elantra owner who is representing other consumers in the class-action lawsuit and meticulously documents his mileage.
Hyundai today said it is retracting its claim that it leads the industry in fuel economy with four models that get 40 miles per gallon on the highway. The estimated highway mileages of most 2013 Accent, Veloster and Elantra models will fall to 37 or 38 mpg.
The errors were uncovered in an audit by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). They echo complaints made by Hyundai and Kia owners like Jamie of Morristown, N.J.
"I bought a 2011 Elantra limited brand new. I am getting on average 22 mpg, summer and now winter. City is 19 and highway is 23 mpg," he said in a posting on ConsumerAffairs. "I'm waiting to see Hyundai's response on this. I have my 3rd visit to the dealership next week. I saw where Honda got in big trouble for misrepresenting mileage (should be around 40 highway, 33 combined)."
Today's disclosure brings to mind claims in a 2004 class-action lawsuit that said Hyundai and Kia overstated the horsepower of their vehicles by as much as 10%. The company blamed those misstatements -- which affected nearly half the Hyundai-Kia cars in sold in the U.S. from the mid-1980s until late 2002 -- on "mistakes and disorganization" within Hyundai.
"Procedural errors"
Consumers rate Hyundai
This time the companies say it was "procedural errors" at their joint testing operations in Korea that led to incorrect fuel economy ratings for select vehicle lines. As part of Hyundai/Kia’s corrective actions, the fuel economy ratings for vehicles currently in showrooms are being voluntarily relabeled. With these changes, the 2012 Hyundai/Kia fleet fuel economy level is reduced by an average of 3 percent – from 27 to 26 MPG.
“I sincerely apologize to all affected Hyundai and Kia customers, and I regret these errors occurred,” said Dr. W. C. Yang, chief technology officer of Hyundai/Kia research and development. “Following up on the EPA’s audit results, we have taken immediate action to make the necessary rating changes and process corrections.”
Reimbursement plan
Both companies say they are putting in place a comprehensive reimbursement program for affected current and former vehicle owners to cover the additional fuel costs associated with the fuel economy rating change. Customers will receive a personalized debit card that will reimburse them for their difference in the EPA combined fuel economy rating, based on the fuel price in their area and their own actual miles driven.
In addition, as an acknowledgement of the inconvenience this may cause, Hyundai and Kia said they will add an extra 15 percent to the reimbursement amount. Current owners will be able to refresh their debit card for as long as they own the vehicle. Prior owners of affected vehicles who have already sold their cars will also be reimbursed using the same formula.
For more information about reimbursement and a complete list of eligible vehicles, customers can visit www.HyundaiMPGinfo.com and www.KiaMPGinfo.com.
"Got your back"
Consumers rate Kia
Hyundai Motor America CEO John Krafcik said Hyundai has identified the source of discrepancies between its testing method and the EPA's recommended approach.
"Given the importance of fuel efficiency to all of us, we're extremely sorry about these errors," Krafcik said in a prepared statement. "When we say to Hyundai owners, 'We've got your back,' that's an assurance we don't take lightly. We're going to make this right for everyone, and we'll be more driven than ever to ensure our vehicles deliver outstanding fuel economy."
The errors were found during routine EPA audits. The EPA audits about 15 percent of vehicles annually. Staff engineers at the EPA's vehicle and fuel emission laboratory in Ann Arbor, Mich., included the Elantra in an annual fuel economy audit.
Hyundai and Kia say they mistakenly overstated the estimated fuel economy on more than 900,000 cars sold in the U.S. over the past two years and will compe...
IKEA Goes Green But Many of Its Customers Are Seeing Red
New emphasis on sustainability is great, but how about some customer service?
In the 2009 romance film "500 Days of Summer", there’s a scene where the main characters Tom and Summer visit an IKEA at the height of their courtship.
It’s one of the best scenes in the movie, not so much because anything really special happens, but because most people in a relationship have strolled through an IKEA together at some point when first getting together, making the scene extremely relatable.
Going to IKEA is sort of a rite of passage for new couples. When you and your mate go to the massive store it sort of says, “Okay, we’re shopping for home furniture together--we must be planning some sort of future.”
Apparently, IKEA is thinking about the future too, as the company recently announced it will become energy-independent and help millions of people around the globe live more sustainably at home--through a new initiative it wants to complete by 2012.
People & Planet Positive
The initiative is called People & Planet Positive and IKEA wants to not only affect its customers, staff and suppliers, it also wants to help those communities where it does business.
The company plans to encourage sustainable living by creating greener products, while also starting a series of programs that will carry out its green agenda.
“We want to create a better every day for the many people. A better life includes living more sustainably,” said IKEA President and CEO Mikael Ohlsson, in an advertisement about the company’s new mission. “We have been working towards that goal for many years and have already done a lot, and we are now ready to take the next big step.”
“People & Planet Positive will help us to do that. Transforming our business and having an even greater positive impact on the world,” he added.
Which means ...
What specifically is IKEA is going to do?
The company says it will first tweak some of its products so they better reduce waste and use less water and energy, like its lights for example. IKEA says it will convert all of its lighting to LED which should last 20 years and use up to 85 percent less electricity.
Over the next several years, IKEA plans to invest nearly $2 billion in developing wind and solar projects, and says it will eventually produce as much renewable energy as it uses in all of its stores and other properties.
The company also said it will obtain 70 percent of its energy needs from renewable sources within the next three years, and will encourage its suppliers to take on that same goal.
How about a little help?
That's fine but many of the IKEA customers we hear from would be happy if they could just get a little help when things go wrong.
Take Joe of Berea, Ohio. He bought a Luftig Range Fan Extractor from IKEA. When the contractor opened the box to install the unit, it was missing a parts bag, Joe said.
"I called IKEA number which is actually Whirlpool's number and was told I would have to buy the part since the unit was not installed within a month of purchase, and then told that they would have to get back with me next week as they had to research which parts came in the parts bag," Joe said in a posting to ConsumerAffairs. "I sent an email to Mr. Ohlsson, CEO of IKEA and another email to Mr. Fettig, CEO of Whirlpool" but at last word Joe was still waiting for satisfaction.
Sharekh of Atlanta also fell victim to missing parts.
"I purchased a MALM 3 drawer chest from IKEA Atlanta on 09/21/12. While setting up the drawer, one of the back panels was missing. I called up IKEA Atlanta and after all the computer-generated options, finally someone named Virginia picked up the call.
"When I told her that the back panel was missing, all she could say was, 'We are sorry, please come and pick it up' from their store and that there is nothing that they can do," Sharkh said. A supervisor later told her the same thing.
"This is not my mistake. Why should I come to IKEA and pick up? I live quite a distance from IKEA and this is not right. So every time I come to IKEA and buy something, there is no guarantee that all the components would be there in the package and there is no way to make sure! This is so bad and the IKEA after-sales service sucks," Sharekh said.
Cheap & green
IKEA says it will keep prices low on its greener products, which the company believes will encourage consumers even more towards living more sustainably.
“We believe that sustainability should not be a luxury good, it should be affordable for everyone,” said IKEA’s Chief Sustainability Officer Steve Howard in a recent statement.
“With over 770 million visitors to our stores, we are excited by the opportunity to help our customers fulfill their dreams at home with beautiful products that help them save money on their household bills by reducing energy and water use, as well as reducing waste”
“People & Planet Positive will also enable us to take our responsibilities in the supply chain further over the coming years by, for example, only using renewable energy to power our building and advocating for children’s rights,” Howard said.
Recyclable furniture
Consumers rate IKEA
In addition, the company says all of its furniture will be recyclable, even the packaging--and by 2012 the company expects to reach its goal of helping households live more sustainably, by selling greener products.
It will be interesting to see how close the company comes to achieving this goal, and how diligently it will work at keeping its promises.
But either way you have to take your hat off to IKEA, even though the company has frustrated consumers in the past with some of its products and services.
And even if IKEA doesn’t encourage the world to live more sustainably, it will probably always be the place that new couples go to buy their first pieces of furniture. Just like in the movies.
Read more about IKEA
In the 2009 romance film "500 Days of Summer", there’s a scene where the main characters Tom and Summer visit an IKEA at the height of their courtshi...
Many believe the Mayor was out of his mind to want the race to happen in the first place
The New York City Marathon has been canceled.
Mayor Michael Bloomberg bowed to complaints that it was unseemly to divert police resources to the marathon while millions of New Yorkers are still suffering in the wake of Hurricane Sandy.
Since the massive East Coast storm nearly toppled the five boroughs along with the neighboring state of New Jersey, New York has been divided on whether the marathon should be held this coming Sunday or not.
With nearly half of the city still without power or heat, residents were furious about Bloomberg’s plan to use generators, auxiliary police, and the other resources it would require to accommodate the race, its participants and the tens of thousands of spectators.
After initially saying the marathon had to go on despite the widespread suffering in the city, Bloomberg changed his position and said he didn’t want controversy and the city’s growing division on the matter, to taint the marathon and what it usually stands for.
“The Marathon has been an integral part of New York City’s life for 40 years and is an event tens of thousands of New Yorkers participate in and millions more watch,” said Bloomberg in a statement. “While holding the race would not require diverting resources from the recovery effort, it is clear that it has become the source of controversy and division.”
“The marathon has always brought our city together and inspires us with stories of courage and determination,” he added. "We would not want a cloud to hang over the race or its participants, and so we have decided to cancel it."
"We cannot allow a controversy over an athletic event—even one as meaningful as this—to distract attention away from all the critically important work that is being done to recover from the storm and get our city back on track.”
No power
The number of generators it would take to accommodate the race while many still go without electricity—including a lot of the elderly and children—is arguably what infuriated critics the most.
Also, the New York City Marathon typically starts in the outer borough of Staten Island, which has seen tremendous devastation from Sandy, as 80,000 residents still remain without power.
The fact that the city would hold a huge celebratory event in one of the most ravaged boroughs in New York was simply ludicrous to a lot of people.
And since just about all of the New York City Police Departmentis involved in the recovery efforts, it would be inevitable that some of them would have been removed from those efforts to provide security for the marathon.
New York City hasn't only been the city that never sleeps, it has also been the city that never quits, and usually no matter what the city endures the pace of New York doesn’t seem to let up.
Never sleeps
So far neither blackout, spike in crime, nor terrorist attack have been able to completely stop the city, and apparently Bloomberg was eager to preserve that reputation.
In an earlier public statement the Mayor spoke in tough cowboy talk about how the city must trudge forward as it has done in the past.
Of course many residents--and even a lot of the runners in the marathon—believed the tough talk was just a front for the amount of money the city would lose if the race didn’t happen.
In fact, Bloomberg did state that New York needed the dollars from the race to make up for the financial losses caused by the storm, but-the-city-trudging-forward-and the being-resilient-talk seemed to be his main reason for initially moving forward with the race.
It’s been reported that the New York City Marathon brings in close to $350 million each year from advertisers and tourists, and some supporters of the race said that large amount of money could have helped with recovery efforts a great deal. It’s safe to assume that New York residents will continue to be divided on this issue, even though the decision has been made.
As far as how this will affect the Mayor’s political legacy, the cancelation of the race is likely to win him a few points for listening and responding to residents. Others will say he only had dollar signs and the city’s reputation in his eyes, and he shouldn’t have tried to move forward with the race in the first place.
It has been recently announced that Mayor Michael Bloomberg has officially canceled the New York City Marathon in wake of the growing contro...
Insurance Companies Waive Hurricane Deductibles in PA
Governor praises 'proactive' response
Residents of Pennsylvania who suffered damage in Hurricane Sandy have gotten some good news. Insurance companies will not enforce hurricane deductibles that normally bear on homeowners' policies.
"Insurance deductibles could have added significant costs to Pennsylvanians already struggling to clean up and rebuild after Hurricane Sandy," said Pennsylvania Gov. Tom Corbett. "Insurance companies have deployed catastrophe teams to Pennsylvania and they have been advised that hurricane deductibles should not be applied to any homeowner's insurance claims."
This is a departure from the norm. Most homeowners' policies carry special "hurricane," "tropical storm" or "named storm" deductibles based on a percentage of a property's insured value. These deductibles typically range from one percent of a home's insured value to five percent.
Proactive response
"We are very pleased with the initial, proactive response we're seeing from insurance companies and their commitment to helping Pennsylvanians recover," Pennsylvania Insurance Commissioner Michael Consedine said. "Insurance companies are experts in managing risk and responding to disaster. We will actively monitor the insurance industry to ensure they are fulfilling their commitments to their policyholders."
That doesn't mean there won't be any out-of-pocket costs. Homeowners, by and large, will still be responsible for paying their standard homeowner deductibles for wind and storm-related claims. They won't be hit with higher hurricane costs.
Regardless of whether you live in Pennsylvania or another northeast state that was in Sandy's path, if you have property damage from the storm you should contact your insurance company as soon as possible.
Here are some additional tips to help when filing a claim:
Before calling your insurance company, try to locate your policy number and other relevant information. Your company representative will prepare a "Notice of Loss" form and an adjuster will be assigned to assist you. Ask for a timeline on when your agent can help you.
Take photographs/video before clean-up or repairs. If you have already taken your damaged items out of the house, take pictures of the debris. After you've documented the damage, make the repairs necessary to prevent further damage, but do not make any permanent repairs until an adjuster or company representative is able to inspect the damage and your carrier approves the repairs.
Save all receipts. Keep a diary of all discussions with your agent or carrier. Cooperate fully with the insurance company. Ask what documents, forms and data you will need to file the claim.
Resident of Pennsylvania who suffered damage in Hurricane Sandy have gotten some good news. Insurance companies will not enforce hurricane deductibles that...
Free download syncs users up with deals at 40,000 retailers
Searching for online coupons and deals got easier this week with the launch of Couponomatic, a browser toolbar released by Boston-based BeFrugal.com, a coupon site.
The browser add-on is available for free download at BeFrugal.com/addon. Once added to your browser, it more or less automates your search for coupons.
It automatically gives shoppers coupon codes during checkout when shopping online at more than 40,000 retailers. Shoppers no longer need to copy and paste codes from one site to another.
Demonstration
In a demonstration for ConsumerAffairs, BeFrugal founder Jon Lal showed how it works, clicking on an online merchant and shopping for a pair of boots. Selecting a pair, he then went to check out.
"Anytime you are placing an online order you'll see a box where you can enter a promotion code, with a drop down arrow," Lal said. "When you click on that you'll see coupon codes that might apply to this order, and these are live coupon codes that are updated daily."
In the on-screen example of the boots purchase, there was a coupon for 25 percent off an order of $75 or more.
"So I click the coupon, hit 'apply,' and now I've just saved $25," he said.
It's easier than searching online for a coupon before visiting the shoe retailer. It's also a lot easier than going through the Sunday paper looking for deals.
Organized electronically
"These ads are similar to the Sunday fliers you would get in your newspaper, except we have them organized electronically," Lal said.
If you sign up for the free BeFrugal membership and download the toolbar, you are also eligible for cash back at more than 3,000 stores. Lal says the average money-back offer across the 3,000 stores is about seven percent.
"You're doubling up," Lal said. "You're getting the savings from the coupons and you're also getting an average seven percent cash back, which is added to your account."
The system also has a crowd-source function. If a shopper entered a coupon code that isn't in the drop down menu, the toolbar remembers that code and as long as it's a successful sale, it's added to the list for future shoppers.
Currently Couponomatic just works on desktops, though Lal says he's working to develop a mobile app. The toolbar works with Internet Explorer, Firefox and Chrome.
Searching for online coupons and deals got easier this week with the launch of Couponomatic, a browser toolbar released by Boston-based BeFrugal.com, a cou...
Walgreens Agrees to Refunds for Wal-Born Purchasers
Ads deceptively said the supplement could prevent colds and fu
If you purchased “Wal-Born” – a Walgreens’ brand dietary supplement, the Federal Trade Commission wants you to know that you may be eligible for a refund.
Walgreens agreed to pay nearly $6 million in 2010, to settle FTC charges that it deceptively advertised that its “Wal-Born” line could effectively prevent colds, fight germs, and boost the immune system. The money will be used to provide refunds.
Walgreens sold the supplements under its store name, and touted their similarity to supplements sold by Airborne Health, Inc., which settled similar deceptive advertising charges by the FTC in 2008. According to the FTC’s complaint, Walgreens advertised its Wal-Born supplements online, in newspaper circulars nationwide, and on packaging.
The FTC settlement with Walgreens bars the company from claiming that its products prevent or treat cold or flu symptoms, or protect against cold and flu viruses by boosting the immune system, unless there is scientific evidence to back up these claims.
Refunds available
Consumers rate Walgreens - General Complaints
Consumers who bought “Wal-Born” supplements between December 1, 2004 and March 29, 2010 can submit a claim for a refund. Some advertisements announcing the refund have incorrectly stated that consumers had to have purchased the supplements by June 30, 2009.
Consumers are eligible to receive up to $5 for each product purchased, for a total of six products or up to $30. The deadline to file a claim is February 4, 2013, and checks will be mailed no later than April 2013. For more information about the refund program, call 1-800-598-3025, or visitwww.ftc.gov/Walgreens.
Consumers should carefully evaluate advertising claims for vitamins and other dietary supplements. For more information see: Who Cares: Dietary Supplements.
If you purchased “Wal-Born” – a Walgreens’ brand dietary supplement, the Federal Trade Commission wants you to know that you may be...
Companies made millions of illegal pre-recorded sales calls
The Federal Trade Commission has pulled the plug on five companies based in Arizona and Florida that were allegedly responsible for millions of illegal pre-recorded calls from “Rachel” and others from “Cardholder Services.” State agencies in Arizona, Arkansas, and Florida also took legal action against similar companies.
Federal courts granted the agency’s request to temporarily halt five robocall operations that allegedly deceived consumers into paying hundreds or thousands of dollars by making phony claims that they could reduce credit card interest rates in return for an upfront fee.
“At the FTC, Rachel from Cardholder Services is public enemy number one,” said FTC Chairman Jon Leibowitz. “We’re cracking down on illegal robocalls by bringing law enforcement actions and pursuing technical solutions to the problem.”
The FTC gets more than 200,000 complaints each month about telemarketing robocalls, including calls from “Rachel” that pitch consumers with a supposedly easy way to save money by reducing their credit card interest rates. After collecting an up-front fee, however, the FTC believes that the companies do little if anything to fulfill their promises.
At the recent Robocall Summit, the FTC issued a challenge to the public offering a $50,000 cash prize for the best technical solution to block illegal robocalls on landlines and mobile phones.
Hi, I'm Rachel
In the robocall cases announced today, the FTC alleges that the defendants place automated calls to consumers, typically with a prerecorded message from “Rachel” or someone else from “Cardholder Services.”
The calls purport to have an “important message” regarding an opportunity to reduce high credit card interest rates. Consumers are urged to “press 1” to connect with a live representative, or “press 2” to discontinue getting such calls. Consumers who press 1 are connected to live telemarketers.
Most consumers have no way to screen the calls using Caller ID, as the incoming number allegedly is often “spoofed,” or displayed as a false number. In many cases, the name displayed on the Caller ID is so generic, such as “Card Services,” that it provides little information about who is calling.
Deceptive offers
According to the FTC, consumers who reach a live telemarketer are then pitched allegedly deceptive offers to have their credit card interest rates substantially reduced, sometimes to as low as 6.9 or even zero percent.
The telemarketers allegedly guarantee that lowering card interest rates will save the consumers thousands of dollars in finance charges in a short period of time and will allow them to pay off the balances more quickly. Some telemarketers allegedly claim that consumers will save at least $2,500 in finance charges and will be able to pay off their balances two to three times faster, without increasing their monthly payments.
In some cases, according to the FTC, the telemarketers claim to be calling from the consumer’s credit card company. In other cases, they use “Cardholder Services” to suggest a relationship with a bank or credit card company.
If the consumer expresses an interest in the rate reduction offer, the telemarketer sometimes conducts a purported “audit” to determine whether the consumer qualifies. Consumers provide their financial and personal information, and are then put on hold while the “audit” is completed. According to the FTC, the “audit” typically is used only to determine whether consumers have enough credit available on their credit cards to pay the company’s fee.
After consumers have been “approved” for the program, according to the FTC, the telemarketer informs them that there is an up-front fee, typically ranging from several hundred dollars to nearly $3,000. To convince them to pay the fee, telemarketers often say that it will be more than offset by the money the consumer will save through the program.
In some cases, the FTC alleges that consumers’ credit cards were charged even if they did not agree to pay for the service. In other cases, the defendants allegedly do not disclose a fee at all, or claim there will be no fee.
The Federal Trade Commission has pulled the plug on five companies based in Arizona and Florida that were allegedly responsible for millions of illegal pre...
Consumers warned not to store gasoline in makeshift containers
Not only is there a gasoline shortage in the northeast states hammered by Hurricane Sandy. It turns out there is also a gasoline can shortage.
As consumers race to fill their tanks, or replenish generators that have run dry because so many gas stations in the storm zone have shut down, they are encountering a shortage of the plastic containers used to transport or store small quantities of fuel.
The Portable Fuel Container Manufacturers Association (PFCMA) has reported the shortage of containers, noting the storm has exhausted inventories of portable gas cans, and manufacturers are unable to keep up with demand for the familiar red cans that are a standard part of most storm recovery kits.
Major plant closed in July
What's behind the shortage? It's not just that consumers went out before the storm to buy up all available cans. American manufacturing capacity dropped by about 70 percent with the July 31 closing of the nation's largest producer of consumer fuel cans.
The association maintains the company closed under the weight of litigation in cases primarily characterized by product misuse. It says that resulted in fewer cans on store shelves.
"Our members are moving all available inventory out to customers, and most are going into back order," said Amanda Emerson, PFCMA spokeswoman. "They are running full out to try and meet demand, but estimates for back-ordered product delivery are ranging from two to five weeks."
Particularly for winter storms, gasoline is critical for back-up power to provide heating for homes and buildings in large population centers. The shortage of portable containers, PFCMA says, is a safety issue.
Safety issues
"If gas cans aren't available, disaster victims need to understand that they put themselves and everyone around them at great risk if they use makeshift containers to transport and store fuel," PFCMA said in a press release. "PFCMA is urging storm victims protect themselves and their neighbors by following safety guidelines for proper storage and handling of fuel."
Consumers should always exercise caution when storing or transporting a flammable product like gasoline. Never use old soda bottles or other makeshift containers to store gas; someone might think it's a beverage and drink it. And even a small cup of gasoline can emit vapors and may ignite.
Gasoline should be stored in a well-ventilated area outside your vehicle and living space. It should be kept away of heat, spark or flame. Consumers should also read the warning labels on gasoline containers.
Not only is there a gasoline shortage in the northeast states hammered by Hurricane Sandy. It turns out there is also a gasoline can shortage.As consumer...
Air France Fined for Violating Price Advertising Rule
Frequent flier program members were not given complete pricing information
Air France is being fined $85,000 for violating the U.S. Department of Transportation’s (DOT) full-fare advertising rules. The carrier was also ordered to cease and desist from further violations.
“Consumers deserve fair treatment from airlines when it comes to price advertising, including up-front disclosure of taxes and fees they must pay in order to fly,” Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood said. “We want to make sure airlines treat their customers with the respect they deserve.”
DOT’s Aviation Enforcement Office found that Air France violated DOT’s price advertising rule that requires carriers to inform consumers of the total price, including all taxes and fees.
Frequent flier discrepancies
Although it promised to redeem loyalty program miles for tickets, Air France initially hid from frequent fliers the monetary amount that they were still required to pay which covered not only government taxes, but also substantial fees that Air France chose to label as "fuel surcharges" that were included under a heading described as “taxes.”
Those fees could amount to more than half the price of certain purchased coach tickets. This was unfair and misleading to consumers.
Air France is being fined $85,000 for violating the U.S. Department of Transportation’s (DOT) full-fare advertising rules. The carrier was also ordered to...
Retailers Step Up Opposition to Interchange Fee Settlement
File objection with court, claiming settlement maintains unfair system
Opposition is building from retailers to a proposed settlement with banks and credit card companies over interchange fees. In two separate actions retailers this week filed objections with the court.
The case goes back to 2005 when a coalition of retailers sued Visa, MasterCard, Bank of America, Citibank, Bank One, Chase Manhattan Bank, J.P. Morgan Chase, Fleet Bank, Capital One and other banks, claiming they engaged in collusive practices by setting credit card interchange fees at "supracompetitive" levels.
A settlement earlier this year mandated a $6 billion payment to retailers and a change in rules that would allow retailers to provide a discount for customers who pay in cash -- something the banks had generally opposed.
Unpopular with retailers
But the settlement was unpopular with retailers from the start. The National Grocers Association (NGA), which represents independent grocery stores, has filed objections to the settlement with the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York, saying the settlement locks in a system they were fighting to reform.
"The NGA Board of Directors from the outset made it crystal clear that NGA was not motivated by money damages, but reform of the collusive establishment of interchange fees and enforcement of anti-competitive rules by the credit card companies and banks that unfairly restrict merchants' freedom to operate," said Peter J. Larkin, NGA President and CEO.
An interchange fee is mostly invisible to consumers although it is reflected in the cost of goods and services. It's the fee that the merchant's bank pays to the customer's bank for processing the consumer's credit or debit card transaction. Merchants generally claim the fees are anti-competitive and don't see much change in the proposed settlement.
"We were and still are all committed to achieving reform of an anti-competitive interchange fee system and rules in order to provide competition, transparency and fairness in the swipe fee marketplace," said Larkin.
Simultaneous action
In a simultaneous action 10 named plaintiffs and another 1,200 small businesses also filed objections to the proposed settlement.
The named class plaintiffs opposing the proposed settlement of the case, which is known as "In Re Payment Card Interchange Fee and Merchant Discount Antitrust Litigation," are Affiliated Foods Midwest, Coborn's, Inc., D'Agostino Supermarkets, Jetro Holdings LLC, National Association of Convenience Stores (NACS), NATSO, National Community Pharmacists Association (NCPA), National Cooperative Grocers Association (NCGA), National Grocers Association (NGA), and National Restaurant Association (NRA).
"The vocal opposition from such a substantial and diverse portion of the merchant community demonstrates just how ineffective and unacceptable this proposed settlement is," said Dave Carpenter, president and CEO, J.D. Carpenter Companies and chairman of the National Association of Convenience Stores. "The proposed settlement is simply a bad deal that further entrenches the anti-competitive practices of the Visa and MasterCard duopoly and denies merchants of their legal right to fight for real changes in court."
Oral arguments are scheduled for November 9.
Opposition is building from retailers to a proposed settlement with banks and credit card companies over interchange fees. In two separate actions retailer...