The Math Behind Bank Of America's New $5 Fee
Not a figure pulled out of thin air
10/01/2011 | By Mark Huffman
Bank of America set off howls of outrage with its announcement that it will begin charging customers who use debit cards to make purchases a $5 monthly fee.
The timing of the announcement, just before today's (Saturday) implementation of new, lower “swipe fees” for banks, is probably not an accident. The $5 fee is designed to make up for Bank of America's loss of revenue, with consumers paying the full freight.
The charge isn't doing much to prop up Bank of America's standing with its customers. A ConsumerAffairs.com analysis of 980,000 comments on Facebook, Twitter and other social media and blogs found net sentiment sinking from 45% positive to 20% negative over the last year.
![]() |
| Blue line shows net sentiment |
It all adds up
Why $5 a month? Because that's a reasonable amount to assume the bank will lose per customer under the new fee structure. The old fee was 44 cents per transaction and the new maximum fee is 24 cents, making for a loss of 20 cents per transaction per customer.
![]() |
Assuming the average customer makes 25 debit card transactions each month, that's $5 per customer that Bank of America is losing under the new swipe fee. Charging each customer who uses a debit card to make a purchase an extra $5 a month, the bank makes up for the lost revenue.
Interestingly, the $5 fee will not be charged to consumers who have a debit card and use it only at ATMs. ATMs have their own set of fees, not affected by the new swipe fee rule.
In the debate earlier this year over changes to the swipe fee rule, retailers argued paying 44 cents per transaction posed too heavy a financial burden. Banks countered that if the fees were lowered, the difference would have to come from somewhere.
![]() |
| Blue line shows net sentiment |
Consumers have options
With Bank of America's new announced debit card fee, and with other major banks testing the concept, it's clear consumers will have to pay the difference. Of course, consumers are not powerless when it comes to avoiding the fee.
Many smaller banks provide more consumer-friendly service that don't charge fees. With direct deposit and online banking, the bank doesn't even have to operate a branch in the city where you live.
Credit unions are another alternative. Offering almost all the same services as a bank, these non-profit institutions have fewer, and lower fees and generally rank much higher in customer satisfaction.
ConsumerAffairs.com analyzed 460,000 consumer comments about credit unions over the last 12 months and found consumers positively aglow. Net sentiment climbed from about 60% positive a year ago to about 80% positive today.

---
Sentiment analysis powered by NetBase
Share your Comments
Jason Hawkins (Sat, 01 Oct 2011 15:06:52 +0000): Any of you still with BoA may want to look at other options. However, this does prove that corporations do not pay taxes since anything they lose will come directly out of your pocket.
Aimee Boehm (Sat, 01 Oct 2011 15:17:53 +0000): Ihhave bofa... I have for years. I'll definitely be switching for this reason among another few... just not sure where. They say the smaller banks with 10 billion or less in assets won't be charging the fee. But I travel a lot. So I want to make sure I have access wherever I go. Torn...
Jason Hawkins (Sat, 01 Oct 2011 15:24:55 +0000): I haven't heard of BB&T charging yet but they may be in the process. If they do then I will change to another bank or CU. I've been with them for 13 years but I'll change out of principle and take the added fees if I travel.
Aimee Boehm (Sat, 01 Oct 2011 15:41:12 +0000): Right. I think half the battle is going to be decifering whether a bank is going to be sly and say they won't do it now, then next year all of a sudden they are in on it too. Is it a mandatory thing? Meaning if ther going to start charging it'll be a now or never type deal?
Chris Langston (Sat, 01 Oct 2011 18:16:08 +0000): Fuck all Banks!
LadyTiona Wood (Sun, 02 Oct 2011 17:09:41 +0000): I despise banks and all their fees
Alan Hale (Sat, 01 Oct 2011 15:11:16 +0000): I am leaving BoA. This was the last straw. There are still banks out there that treat customers as customers, not faceless means of generating revenue.
Tamara Miller (Sat, 01 Oct 2011 21:46:29 +0000): Generating revenue is the whole motivation for going into the banking industry in the first place, though.
Eric Wertheimer (Sat, 01 Oct 2011 15:12:01 +0000): did they ever think of cutting the salaries of the CEO and the golden parachutes of all those at the top?
Linda Aldana (Sat, 01 Oct 2011 15:18:21 +0000): Haahaahaa! That's a good one!
Eric Wertheimer (Sat, 01 Oct 2011 15:28:20 +0000): Linda Aldana But seriously, why is the solution always to raise rates.....they are a consumer be damned company and I hoe that a boycott takes place
Linda Aldana (Sat, 01 Oct 2011 15:32:28 +0000): http://moveyourmoneyproject.org/
Ronald Johnson (Sat, 01 Oct 2011 15:58:56 +0000): Linda Aldana Yeah. Good idea and thanks for the link! But, I've been told that there are now laws in place that prevent local community banks from actually being community banks. Sorry, I was told that by the LO at Markle Bank here in Indiana. As time goes on I can pry more and more info from these people but when you work all the time, how can you fight them?
Vlad Gulin (Sat, 01 Oct 2011 18:29:02 +0000): Interesting link. I agree that its good to support local Credit Unions which are non-profit. Not only will they help build local communities but also when you need to take out a loan - most have better rules and rates versus top big banks.
Eric Wertheimer (Thu, 13 Oct 2011 11:36:03 +0000): I still believe the way to have an impact is for someone to begin a FB petition drive and collect signataures of all those that will withdraw their money, IN CASH, on a SPECIFIC DATE,,,,,,,,just imagine the press it would get...
Nathan Russell (Sat, 01 Oct 2011 15:15:38 +0000): That's crazy.. no such fees here in Europe, not even for using an ATM.
Ray Escamilla (Sat, 01 Oct 2011 16:47:54 +0000): Nathan, America has become the land for the rich to get richer and the poor to stay that way. I'm afraid what our class structure will look like in 20 years. Europe, through it's age, has the wisdom to know what such practices bring. Defend yourself working class America!
Jason Gruner (Sat, 01 Oct 2011 15:18:17 +0000): "The Evil Corporations" More Class Warfare Propaganda. This is BECAUSE of Dick Durbin that brought this legislation. Govt interference TAKING MORE MONEY Out of your pockets through bullchit legislative laws. What consumers do not realize is that they had been paying for the fee's the entire time. Dick Durbin changed regulations and the banks adapted to it. Strange that the people being arrested around the Country do not protest the trillions of dollars being sent over sea's to China and Saudi Arabia because lack of Tarrifs and keeping the markets even? How about you protest the Federal Govt "Blood Money Tax" on Cigarettes? Cigarettes are the REAL cause of exploding healthcare costs. The Federal Govt allows 600,000 Americans to die directly from Cigarettes every year whilst at any given time 3million Americans are dying of cancer directly attributed from Cigarettes.. State and Federal Govt collect almost billions of dollars per year in "Blood Money Tax". Before flapping your hands against your key boards take a minute to educate yourselves on what you are speaking of. BoA is not the devil.
Gloria Hurd Lowell (Sun, 02 Oct 2011 10:45:58 +0000): It is just nuts. Hope all is well at the Vineyard.
Susan Egan (Sat, 01 Oct 2011 15:18:31 +0000): Is it a coincidence that B of A's website has had problems over the past couple of days after announcing its new fees?
Wendy Howard Gray (Sat, 01 Oct 2011 15:30:54 +0000): I was wondering the same thing!
Ashley Robbins (Sat, 01 Oct 2011 15:26:47 +0000): I will be taking every pen and mint, I can get my hands on. Just to offset my cost ;).
Brandy Collins (Sat, 01 Oct 2011 16:52:55 +0000): haha next thing you know there will be a $2 monthly cost to each person with an account to offset SKYROCKETING costs of coffee, mints, and pens at each banking location. ;D
Mizan Rahman (Sat, 01 Oct 2011 15:29:50 +0000): Time to leave BofA I think. CapitalOne are offering a decent package where everything is free if you maintain a balance and pay you interest.
David Schultz (Sat, 01 Oct 2011 15:31:16 +0000): The typical backwards thinking of B of A, they will lose millions when people leave in droves (I stopped using them in the 80's) then change their mind when it's too late!
Susan Simpson Clark (Sat, 01 Oct 2011 15:32:04 +0000): I would be happy if they would just get the online banking up and running. It was down all day yesterday and again today. Ridiculous!
Frank King (Sat, 01 Oct 2011 15:34:43 +0000): Thank you Senator Dick Durbin for sticking it to consumers to help your big box merchant friends!
Steve Fox (Thu, 06 Oct 2011 01:45:19 +0000): Move to a credit union. This isn't Durbin's fault this is squarely on the head of BoA who think they if they can't screw you one way they will o it to you another way
Frank King (Sat, 08 Oct 2011 20:46:26 +0000): Steve Fox --- well Mr Fox, sorry but I have to disagree. The only reason the credit unions have lower fees, is because they're exempt from a lot of government regulations that apply to their Bank cousins. For example, the Durbin amendment which directly impacted BofA's revenue, does not impact credit unions directly. Government agencies that issue debit cards are also exempt from the interchange cap. A LOT of banks will now lose money on their debit card programs, while merchants take great advantage of a fast, secure payment network for less than cost. What a joke!
Bill Depalma (Sat, 01 Oct 2011 15:36:11 +0000): Thank the government... if they don't charge the fee, then they need to lay off 100,000 employees to cover the cost of lost fees. in u.s. government job programs, that would be only 100 jobs... but this is the private sector.
Rich Stroot (Sat, 01 Oct 2011 15:37:07 +0000): It is a free market, anyone can change, vote with your pocket book, that is the beauty of the American markets, don't complain, leave.
Brady Richard (Sat, 01 Oct 2011 17:47:35 +0000): Great article dad!!!
Doug Simon (Sat, 01 Oct 2011 15:37:45 +0000): Go to this website to demand our Tariffs back: http://wh.gov/4sL We can not compete against slave labor!
Chris Knollenberg (Sat, 01 Oct 2011 15:41:11 +0000): Way to go Bank of America screw the consumer again and again and again..
Jennifer Jean Wardlaw (Sat, 01 Oct 2011 15:48:43 +0000): Here's what people don't realize. You're already paying this fee. It's integrated into the cost of consumer goods which HAVE to pay the swipe fees. Now part of the integrated cost is taken out and simply exists as a charge.
Jesus people, this is a good thing! All costs are ultimately borne by consumers. Now at least you can SEE what you're being charged instead of it being hidden in the contractual clauses of the merchants who have to jack up prices.
I'm not saying BoA doesn't suck, but this is not why.
Brad Rhoad (Sat, 01 Oct 2011 16:09:06 +0000): Your thought is correct, but your implied conclusion is flawed. Do you really think that merchants are going to lower prices for us because we are now footing the swipe charge fees? Nope. Ultimately, the merchants are the ones that benefit here.
Martha Young (Sat, 01 Oct 2011 16:10:43 +0000): Except that, as I understand it, the "cost" to the bank of each transaction is around 4 cents. So all the new restrictions are doing is reducing the humungous profit per transaction to just a really big profit per transaction. To say the banks "have to make up the revenue" - as if this would actually make them go out of business instead of just still allowing them to make plenty of profit -- is absurd.
Jason Burt (Sat, 01 Oct 2011 16:16:47 +0000): No offense, but you're being naive. Retailers will keep the prices the same because consumers won't notice a change in price, they'll reap more profits.
Also your ideological stance that the consumers should pay the price doesn't work here...BoA is averaging the cost to all of their customers who use their debit card; like the math posted in the article said...it's based on consumer using their debit card 25 times a month. I use mine maybe 2 or 3 times a month....guess what...BoA still takes my money, I'm subsidizing OTHER people's consumer spending.
This is simple. BoA is forcing their customers to pay the bill. They're just like the government; forecasting their income and spending it before it arrives; then when their forecasts are wrong they make the customer/citizens pay.
Ray Escamilla (Sat, 01 Oct 2011 16:44:42 +0000): Jennifer, Your point is based on the concept that retailers will now lower prices for goods or not have a debit/credit fee. Not going to happen. In the end, it's the bank that will lose revenue after this change and for-profit institutions will want to recoup that money. You are more than welcome to now pay $5 on top of the fees charged by retailers (via direct fee or integrated into the price of goods). For myself, I have closed my BofA account and moved to a local CU. I will continue to buy my goods at the retailers of my choice and not have an additional monthly fee for use of my money by my bank. BofA costumers are not getting any value add from the new ATM usage fee. BofA has already shown that they will easily and readily take money out of your pocket to make sure profits increase at the benefit of shareholders and execs. I am neither, so my business goes elsewhere.
Eric Wertheimer (Sat, 01 Oct 2011 16:51:41 +0000): perhaps you could explain why tightening their own belt...ie.....cutting some of the preposterous salaries and retirement packages is not an option
Jennifer Jean Wardlaw (Sun, 02 Oct 2011 14:38:56 +0000): Sigh. Basic economics are hilarious...
Pamela Picard (Sun, 02 Oct 2011 19:41:40 +0000): Sorry Jennifer, your argument is flawed. You are paying the swipe fee (16 cents) plus profit (8 cents) plus $5 for using your debit card to offset the bank's loss as a result of Dodd-Franks. I'd feel like a sucker if I accepted that.
Robin Langford-Norris (Mon, 10 Oct 2011 14:01:06 +0000): Merchants will NOT lower fees to off set our added expense. You have the wool pulled over your eyes. Wake up and smell them burning our money!
Malcolm Wardlaw (Thu, 13 Oct 2011 04:19:38 +0000): OK, I have to come clean. I wrote this and accidentally posted it under my wife's account. She is apparently very sad that a gaggle full of idiots are responding to my post. So let me set it straight, for the record. THIS IS EXACTLY HOW ECONOMICS WORKS. There are a number of lovely undergraduate level textbooks on the subject, with lots of nice pretty pictures for everyone, if you would like to know more.
Ronald Johnson (Sat, 01 Oct 2011 15:51:06 +0000): I still think its funny you guys use banks. They are ALL crooks. Taking money to make money. Sounds brilliant and I'm sure you're all jealous. With no tangible service or product to return, all that makes banks are huge money black holes (read: BUBBLE). And that's the whole premise with banks today. They use your money now, and you pay them to use it.. Hehehe. All in the meantime, you, that is YOU contribute to the very 'autoInflation' that drove up the price of your Starbucks. Like Travolta put it in Swordfish, "It's like masturbation, without the payoff." Get a grip. Make the GoV repeal laws that prevent real community banks. If EYE were U, I'd be asking the banks why this is a flat rate. Obviously some of us only use our cards a few times a month, while others use theirs every transaction. BoA is stupid. Banks are stupid and dangerous. I'm angry at you guys because you participate in this crap and I have to help pay for it everytime I do something like even buying gas.. STOP TAKING LOANS. LIVE BY YOUR MEANS. This is all common sense. If we'd all work together we'd put these worthless scum bags back in our pockets where they belong.
David Poole (Sat, 01 Oct 2011 15:57:44 +0000): lol; this makes me wish I had stayed a Bank Of America/Nation's Bank customer instead of switching to a credit union 10-15 years back.
Jared Reno (Sat, 01 Oct 2011 16:00:25 +0000): My wife and I learned from Wells Fargo that they will be doing similar fees; but only after we read the article released Thursday. Our response? We closed our accounts and drove to the credit union about .5 mile away and opened our account. The big banks will suffer the same consumer outrage as the airlines that started charging for checked bags. oh yeah, BTW airlines, Southwest STILL doesn't charge those fees. Our new credit union? Rogue Federal in Southern Oregon.
James Driskell (Sat, 01 Oct 2011 16:02:18 +0000): Ya know. There are some companies and small businesses out there that 'want' to make customers. A customer being one of those that wants to return to do business with them again and again. Apparently BofA is not wanting to create long standing customers. Show them how free this market really is and drop them by the millions. Look what happened and is still happening to Netflix. 30% drop on the stock market and still going.
Joey Daddy (Sat, 01 Oct 2011 16:13:59 +0000): 5 bucks a month is a couple of Starbucks coffees. Get real. Its not a big deal.
Brandy Collins (Sat, 01 Oct 2011 16:44:22 +0000): For me, $5 is a gallon of gas to get me to work; a gallon of milk and a box of cereal for the kids; 2 tickets to the $1.50 movie and a small soda when and if we get to treat ourselves; a box of school supplies from the dollar store; dish soap and a sponge; a bag of cat food; toothpaste and a basic toothbrush; or a couple rolls of toilet paper.
"Only 5 bucks" really sucks when you don't have it, but need it, for basic day-to-day living. A little compassionate understanding, please.
Marge Rowland Marino (Sat, 01 Oct 2011 16:15:21 +0000): I've been a credit union member for many many years....Never understood why people even use these greedy banks....Doesn't make any sense to me...Why pay someone's when you can be a co-owner yourself through a credit union? Credit Unions began during the great depression for reason---- to avoid this type of greed!
Kelsey Brady (Sat, 01 Oct 2011 16:21:10 +0000): Lets also remember when it comes to fee's, that using cash is more labor intensive for a store than debit or credit. First it takes longer to complete a transaction, the cash has to be counted and reconciled for each till, and then someone has to count, organize, deposit the cash in the bank, and get change for cash registers each and every day. Store act like debit is a huge loss, but it is so much easier and gets deposited right into their bank accounts each day. Then there is the fact that credit cards have higher fee's than debit, so if everyone started using those instead where does that leave them?
Pamela Picard (Sun, 02 Oct 2011 19:43:24 +0000): Merchants love cash darling. We pay up to 4% on gross sales including state taxes to accommodate the use of credit cards and debit cards. Give me a good old fashioned Ben Franklin any day.
Nilo Bachata (Sat, 01 Oct 2011 16:23:55 +0000): BAC losses $8 billion dollars due to bad loans and mortgages and this is how they recover? After taking $97 billion in TARP money from taxpayers? All the other banks will follow....Recession 2.0 has already started and the banks and Wall Street know this already. Whoever thinks this has anything to do with "swipe fees" or that the retailers will pass along a 20 cents savings to the customers is living in a dream world.
Joe Seba (Sat, 01 Oct 2011 16:37:21 +0000): "Assuming the average customer makes 25 debit card transactions each month, that's $5 per customer that Bank of America is losing under the new swipe fee. " No...BOA isn't "losing" a penny. They're just not making as much. And what if you don't make 25 transactions/month? I have a feeling BOA will be making even more money on debit cards now. They've pretty much guaranteed themselves a substantial profit by charging you to spend your money. It is totally unbelievable to me that BOA won't have a massive turnover come Monday.
Brandy Collins (Sat, 01 Oct 2011 16:49:13 +0000): A couple of months ago, Bank of America charged me a $12 monthly maintenance fee for having a MyAccess account instead of an Ebanking account. I do not remember being notified of this new fee, and it took them 30 seconds to switch my account type over the phone, and my banking behavior stayed the same. They are definitely NOT about the customer at this point.
I called to verify, the $5 charge is being implemented next year with letters going out to current customers a month before the change. The phone rep was quick to assure me that all banking centers were going to do the same, and that it was effectively the government's fault for the new charges- she did not outline history behind the charge and Did make it sound as if the bank was going to go under and take us all with it if they didn't start charging. Oh, please!
Stephanie Kramer (Sat, 01 Oct 2011 16:54:01 +0000): That darn government, trying to screw over the banks by making them more accountable and honest. How dare them? I will certainly be keeping an eye on MY bank account for this change.
Diana Cerasin (Sat, 01 Oct 2011 17:26:06 +0000): Wells Fargo is going to be charging me $3 a month just for using a debit card. This is starting to get out of hand.
Brandy Collins (Sat, 01 Oct 2011 17:47:36 +0000): They make money off the interest they gain by loaning and investing our money while it sits in their hands. Charging us is just ridiculous!
Angelia Kopf Rictor (Sat, 01 Oct 2011 19:26:52 +0000): Credit unions... Local credit unions are the way to go! I Despise BOA with a passion and wish they would go away. Its just nuts.
Ankur Saggar (Sat, 01 Oct 2011 20:28:51 +0000): Not something I like but I am fine paying the fees for the service I get from BOA. I think they offer better services than any other banks like chase, citibank and wells fargo.
Tamara Miller (Sat, 01 Oct 2011 21:45:31 +0000): Big deal. It's $5. That's a couple of bags of Doritos.
Jawan Terrell (Sun, 02 Oct 2011 02:51:50 +0000): tamara, my mom hate when white women fart by her, and wuld hit u in the face if u farted by her. wuld u say sorry if my mom hit u for doing that?
Dan Stiel (Sat, 01 Oct 2011 22:32:06 +0000): This is the best thing to happen to community banks and credit unions since the free toaster giveaways of the 1960s.
Simon Saugier (Sun, 02 Oct 2011 03:11:21 +0000): Hey here's a question - why is the government telling the banks how much they can charge in swipe fees? What happened to 'free market'? Oh right - ever since they bought the banks... I forgot... But why are all of the banks getting hit with the same rules? Still, I'm dropping BoA...
Casey Richardson (Sun, 02 Oct 2011 11:29:37 +0000): SunTrust in North Alabama sent me a letter 2 months ago stating not only will they start charging us, already POOR members, the $5 debit fee, but they're also putting their OTHER hand in the pot each month for a $7 "service" charge.I haven't used my debit card in 5-6mos and the so called service fee bs supposedly covers them for cashing my paycheck blah blah...I NEVER have them cash my checks.I have a "free" checking acct. because the country has forced you to own plastic in order to have or do certain things.If you don't keep a minimum balance (which is a large amt they've set) then you get no breaks, otherwise they've listed certain credits.No, they don't give 2 shhts about their customers, not ONE of them...and yes, this boils down to alot of BS things but mainly-if you aren't keeping enough of your $$ there for them to play with then you're going to have to GIVE them play $$.All the non-sense about merchants lowering prices, NOT, I work for a store, get paid in peanuts, lucky if I get a btroom break in 8-9HRS, much less 5mins to clear the "tunnel vision".I've had the job 4yrs and the only price that moves is *fuel* up..up..up...down a few cents...repeat, the country is quickly going 1 step forward (barely) and 4 steps back.I could make a very long list of product that's done nothing but rise in cost-never goes down unless there's a limited "deal".It's never going to get better, not until everyone complaining (like me and you) joins together and fixes it, God Bless our children if this doesn't start getting better, what a mess.Thank goodness we at least have plenty of awesome CUs in the area.I've read of many others that have already left or will be this month, since the fees begin 11-10-11.
Pamela Picard (Sun, 02 Oct 2011 19:38:46 +0000): The cost to process a debit card transaction is 16 cents not 44 cents. I have a merchant card for a tiny online business, which pays substantially higher processing fees than "too big to care" BofA. If they really want more profit, they can push back on the processors which is where the cost derives. It's just too easy to pass it on to the consumer, largely because of people like you who promote their poppycock. Please don't defend these bandits.
Samir Shah (Mon, 03 Oct 2011 01:20:20 +0000): I love my bank, Southern Community. Their website is small enough to care. They require I use my debit card 10 times a month, and in return, I get interest (it was 6% in 2008, now down to 1%), I can use any ATM and they refund the fees charged by the other bank, and I get great customer service. I called them last week and they have no plans to charge any fees.
Daniel Rosen (Mon, 03 Oct 2011 05:21:22 +0000): Check out PerkStreet (www.perkstreet.com), free online checking acct with 10s of thousands of free ATMs and 1% back on everything you spend on the debit card (rather than charging you a monthly fee!)
Felix Branson (Mon, 03 Oct 2011 20:59:33 +0000): Well, of course BofA and all other banks will find ways to make up for their lost revenues. Did anyone really expect them to cheerfully write off their losses and move on? Whoever did expect that probably also believed that retailers will be passing their savings on to their customers. Ever since the Fed cut the debit interchange fees it was obvious to anyone who was paying attention that consumers will end up footing the bill. http://blog.unibulmerchantservices.com/debit-card-fee-limit-lifted-to-24-cents-consumers-will-still-pay-for-it

