Current Events in April 2025

Browse Current Events by year

2025

Browse Current Events by month

Get trending consumer news and recalls

    By entering your email, you agree to sign up for consumer news, tips and giveaways from ConsumerAffairs. Unsubscribe at any time.

    Thanks for subscribing.

    You have successfully subscribed to our newsletter! Enjoy reading our tips and recommendations.

    The tariff bell tolls for Volvo's last U.S. sedan, the s90

    The China-based automaker is relying on its crossover models

    Key takeaways:

    • Sources indicate Volvo will cancel U.S. orders for the S90 next year, citing the low sales volume of the model in the American market.
    • In response to the Trump administration's tariffs, Volvo is also reducing incentives on existing U.S. inventory and exploring increased production at its South Carolina plant.
    • The decision highlights the growing impact of the escalating trade war on global automakers with production in China and underscores Volvo's strategic shift towards its higher-volume crossover models in the U.S.

    If you've always dreamed of having a big, luxurious Volvo S90, dream on but you'll soon have to confine your shopping to the used-car lot. 

    Volvo is reportedly planning to discontinue U.S. sales of the S90, which is manufactured in China, as trade tensions between the United States and China intensify and as the automaker grapples with newly imposed tariffs on Chinese goods, including vehicles.

    ​Automotive News quoted a person familiar with Volvo’s strategy, who wished to remain anonymous, as saying that the S90 is a "low-volume car for the U.S.," with only 1,364 units sold in 2024.

    "Rather than deal with [the tariffs], they are just going to cut it out," the source explained. The company will reportedly focus on its more popular XC90, XC60, and XC40 crossover SUVs in the American market. A Volvo spokesperson declined to comment, Automotive News said.

    President Trump on Wednesday significantly escalated trade tensions by slapping a 125 percent tariff on goods made in China, a fivefold increase from the 25 percent levy applied to vehicles from other countries on April 3rd. Those tariffs will remain in effect even after a temporary pause on reciprocal duties with most other nations.

    A slow but steady retreat

    Discontinuing the S90 would mark Volvo's further retreat from the shrinking U.S. sedan market. Last summer, the automaker ceased U.S. sales of the S60, which was produced in South Carolina.

    Despite a 7.5 percent increase in U.S. sales during the first quarter, reaching 33,285 vehicles, Volvo's global deliveries saw a 5.7 percent decline, with slumps in key markets like Europe and China. The heavy reliance on imports – 96.8 percent of Volvo's U.S. sales in the first quarter were imported from Europe or China – exposes the company to significant risks from the Trump administration's aggressive trade policies.

    In addition to the S90, Volvo's new EX30 subcompact crossover is also sourced from China, although production of that model is slated to expand to Ghent, Belgium, later this year.

    Volvo said, however, that it is "ramping up" production of the electric EX90 crossover at its currently underutilized Ridgeville, S.C., assembly plant to boost volumes and reduce costs.

    To deal with the increasing costs of importing vehicles into the U.S., Volvo is also adjusting its incentive strategy. While sticker prices are not expected to change for now, the automaker plans to implement "minor incentive changes," a company executive said. This includes reducing discounts on imported vehicles already in the U.S. before the tariffs took effect. The company intends to use these savings to offset the financial burden of future imports subject to the higher tariffs.

    Key takeaways: Sources indicate Volvo will cancel U.S. orders for the S90 next year, citing the low sales volume of the model in the American market....

    Get trending consumer news and recalls

      By entering your email, you agree to sign up for consumer news, tips and giveaways from ConsumerAffairs. Unsubscribe at any time.

      Thanks for subscribing.

      You have successfully subscribed to our newsletter! Enjoy reading our tips and recommendations.

      Pedestrian deaths rising faster than overall U.S. population growth

      California, Florida, Texas account for 35% of pedestrian deaths

      Key Points: Pedestrian fatalities in the U.S. have risen 50% over the past decade, with 3,304 deaths recorded in the first half of 2024 alone....

      State attorneys general urge House to reject axing overdraft fee

      Overturning the rule means big banks profit at consumers' expense, the AGs argue

      UPDATE: Despite the pleas of consumer advocates the House voted largely along party lines to trash the consumer protection overdraft bill, with Republicans mostly voting to do so and Democrats largely opposing it. 

      Key Points:

      • New York AG Letitia James and 22 other attorneys general are urging the U.S. House to reject a resolution that would reverse the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau’s 2024 rule capping overdraft fees.

      • The CFPB rule applies only to large banks with over $10 billion in assets, limiting excessive fees that can damage credit and force account closures.

      • Critics say overturning the rule would prioritize bank profits over consumers, as overdraft fees often exceed the overdraft amount and disproportionately hurt low-income Americans.


      A coalition of 23 attorneys general, led by New York Attorney General Letitia James, has sent a letter to U.S. House leaders urging them to vote against a resolution that would overturn a key Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) rule limiting overdraft fees charged by the nation’s largest banks.

      The CFPB rule, finalized in 2024, aims to rein in excessive overdraft fees, which have long been a lucrative but controversial source of revenue for banks. It applies only to banks with more than $10 billion in assets and is designed to protect consumers from predatory charges when they accidentally overdraw their checking accounts.

      “Overturning this rule will only do one thing: help big banks profit at your expense,” said AG James in a statement. “Accidentally overdrawing your account by a few dollars shouldn’t result in an outrageous fee.”

      Banks favor scrapping the consumer protection measure, which they say does more harm than good. "It’s important to remember that government-imposed price controls only harm the consumers they’re purported to help," the Consumer Bankers Association argues in a statement on its website. 

      Overdraft fees: A costly burden

      The average overdraft fee is around $35, often far exceeding the actual overdrawn amount. In 2023 alone, U.S. banks collected $5.8 billion in overdraft-related revenue. According to the AG coalition, a $35 fee on a $26 overdraft—typically repaid within three days—is equivalent to an annual interest rate of 16,000%.

      The attorneys general argue that such fees are not only excessive but also disproportionately harm low-income consumers, frequently leading to credit damage and involuntary account closures that can push people out of the banking system altogether.

      The CFPB rule, if preserved, would force banks to treat overdraft fees like interest on a loan, making their true cost more transparent and subject to regulatory scrutiny.

      All eyes on the House

      The House is expected to vote on House Joint Resolution 59, which would nullify the CFPB’s overdraft rule. The Senate narrowly passed its version last month in a 52–48 vote, with Republican Senator Josh Hawley (Mo.) joining Democrats in support of the consumer protection.

      Supporters of the CFPB rule point out that many major banks — including Citigroup, Capital One, and Ally Bank — have already eliminated overdraft fees voluntarily, demonstrating that such charges are not essential for maintaining basic banking services.

      Joining AG James in signing the letter are attorneys general from California, Illinois, Massachusetts, North Carolina, and other states, as well as the Hawaii Office of Consumer Protection.

      With tens of millions of consumers affected by overdraft policies each year, the outcome of this vote could have major implications for bank customers nationwide — particularly those living paycheck to paycheck.

      Key Points: New York AG Letitia James and 22 other attorneys general are urging the U.S. House to reject a resolution that would reverse the Consu...

      Real ID Hits May 7: What Travelers Need to Know

      You won't be able to fly without a Real ID or other approved identification

      Key Points:

      • Beginning May 7, 2025, the TSA will enforce Real ID requirements at airport security for domestic travel.

      • Only Real ID-compliant licenses or approved alternatives like passports will be accepted at checkpoints.

      • Millions of Americans still lack compliant IDs, raising concerns about delays and disruptions at airports.


      After nearly two decades of delays, the long-anticipated Real ID enforcement deadline is finally approaching — and airline passengers who aren't prepared may find themselves grounded.

      Starting May 7, travelers flying within the United States will need to present a Real ID-compliant driver’s license or another approved form of identification at Transportation Security Administration (TSA) checkpoints.

      The requirement, passed by Congress in the wake of the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, is intended to strengthen national security by standardizing the process for issuing state IDs.

      Are you Real ID-Ready?

      As of early 2024, only about 56% of IDs nationwide met Real ID standards, though TSA says about 80% of current travelers are presenting acceptable identification. That still leaves a significant number of people who may be turned away from security checkpoints if they attempt to fly without the right credentials.

      “I do anticipate some disruption,” said Rich Davis, senior security adviser at International SOS. “It’s going to be a little bit of a stressful day or 10.”

      To check whether your license is compliant, look for a star in the upper corner — often a black or gold star, or a star inside a circle or bear. If your license lacks this symbol, it won’t be accepted for air travel after May 7.

      What counts as approved?

      If you don’t have a Real ID, you’ll need to present another accepted form of identification, such as:

      • A valid U.S. passport or passport card

      • A DHS Trusted Traveler card (like Global Entry or Nexus)

      • A Department of Defense or Veteran Health ID card

      • Identification issued by a federally recognized tribal nation

      • Enhanced driver’s licenses from certain states

      • Foreign passports and permanent resident cards

      A temporary paper license issued after applying for Real ID is not accepted, so travelers should apply at least two weeks in advance to allow time for processing and mailing.

      Prepare for crowds at the DMV

      State motor vehicle departments are already experiencing long lines and limited appointment availability as the deadline nears. While AAA branches in some states can process Real ID applications, not all do, and non-members may face additional fees.

      “If you don’t have a trip coming up, consider waiting until after May 7 to avoid the rush,” said AAA spokeswoman Aixa Diaz.

      Until then, TSA is urging Americans to double-check their ID before heading to the airport — or risk missing their flight entirely.

      Key Points: Beginning May 7, 2025, the TSA will enforce Real ID requirements at airport security for domestic travel. Only Real ID-complia...

      $24 billion is the U.S. tariff tab for Japanese automakers

      The 4Runner, Prius, and Tacoma, are imported from Japan and Mexico and could be hit hard

      Key Points:

      • Trump administration tariffs could cost Japanese carmakers over ¥3.5 trillion ($24 billion), with Toyota alone accounting for $12 billion, according to UBS Securities.

      • The move targets an industry that has invested heavily in U.S. jobs and factories, despite Japan imposing no tariffs on U.S. vehicle imports.

      • Automakers may be forced to shift production to the U.S., though political uncertainty clouds long-term decisions.


      Japanese automakers are bracing for tens of billions of dollars in potential losses following the Trump administration’s decision to impose steep tariffs on imported vehicles and parts, a move that could destabilize one of the most critical cross-Pacific trade relationships.

      A new analysis by UBS Securities estimates that the seven largest Japanese car brands face more than ¥3.5 trillion ($24 billion) in added costs. Toyota alone could bear half that total, with a projected ¥1.8 trillion ($12 billion) burden.

      The irony, experts say, is hard to ignore: Japan does not levy any tariffs on U.S.-made vehicles, even though American automakers have long struggled to gain a foothold in the Japanese market.

      Trade tensions hit key producers

      Japan’s automobile exports to the U.S. totaled ¥6 trillion ($40 billion) in 2024, accounting for 30% of all vehicle exports. The U.S. is Japan’s single largest auto export market, according to data from the Ministry of Finance.

      While many Japanese companies—including Toyota, Honda, Nissan, and Subaru—already build millions of vehicles in U.S. factories, analysts say they may be forced to further shift production to the U.S. to absorb the financial blow.

      “Japanese car manufacturers will probably have to take some kind of action, such as transferring production to the United States,” said Kohei Takahashi, an analyst at UBS.

      But such moves are complex and slow, especially given political uncertainty around the permanence of the tariffs. Automakers remain wary of making massive investments without clarity on whether Democrats—if returned to power—might roll back the policy.

      Trying to absorb the shock

      Toyota, which built 1.5 million vehicles in the U.S. in 2024, says it will cover the added costs of importing parts from Mexico and Canada for now. The company has major manufacturing operations in Kentucky, Alabama, Indiana, Mississippi, Texas, and West Virginia, plus a battery plant in North Carolina.

      Still, several Toyota models, including the 4Runner, Prius, and Tacoma, are imported from Japan and Mexico, and their prices could spike under the new tariffs.

      Lobbyists for Japanese automakers are pressuring Congress for relief, arguing that Japanese car companies are major job creators in red states.

      Key Points: Trump administration tariffs could cost Japanese carmakers over ¥3.5 trillion ($24 billion), with Toyota alone accounting for $12 bill...

      Are Americans losing interest in electric cars?

      Gallup poll finds interest dips in last two years while hybrids gain

      Key Points:

      • Interest in electric vehicles (EVs) in the U.S. has dropped from 59% in 2023 to 51% in 2024, according to a new Gallup poll.

      • Support for EVs declined most sharply among young adults and upper-income households, though it fell across party lines.

      • Hybrid vehicles now show stronger consumer interest than EVs, with 65% of adults open to owning one.


      American enthusiasm for electric vehicles has dimmed over the past year, with just over half of adults now saying they own or are open to owning an EV — a sharp decline from a high point in 2023, according to new data from Gallup’s annual Environment survey.

      Only 3% of U.S. adults say they currently own an EV, while another 8% say they’re seriously considering a purchase. An additional 40% say they might consider one in the future. That brings total interest in electric vehicles to 51%, down from 59% last year, and marks a cooling trend that cuts across income levels, age groups, and political affiliations.

      The percentage of Americans firmly opposed to buying an EV has remained steady at 47%, up from 41% in 2023. Meanwhile, the most enthusiastic supporters — those who either own or are seriously considering purchasing one — have dropped from 16% to just 11% over the past year.

      Source: Gallup

      Why the drop in interest?

      While the exact reasons for the decline are unclear, Gallup notes that the survey period coincided with several developments that may have influenced public opinion.

      Among them were protests and vandalism targeting Tesla — spurred by dissatisfaction with CEO Elon Musk’s controversial role as head of the Department of Government Efficiency — and former President Donald Trump’s purchase of a Tesla vehicle on March 11, a move that made headlines and reportedly boosted Tesla’s stock by $56 billion.

      Hybrids offer a middle ground

      At the same time, Gallup introduced a new question measuring consumer interest in hybrid vehicles, and the results suggest Americans may be pivoting toward options that combine gasoline and electric power.

      A significant 65% of adults said they already own (8%), are seriously considering (10%), or might consider (47%) a hybrid vehicle — outpacing EV interest in every category. The preference for hybrids may reflect growing concerns about the charging infrastructure and reliability of fully electric cars.

      Looking ahead

      While EV adoption may still grow with policy support and technological improvements, the latest data highlight a cooling in consumer sentiment — and a need for automakers and policymakers to reassure the public about the convenience and sustainability of electric mobility. Meanwhile, hybrids appear to be gaining favor as a more flexible, less controversial alternative.

      Key Points: Interest in electric vehicles (EVs) in the U.S. has dropped from 59% in 2023 to 51% in 2024, according to a new Gallup poll. S...