Current Events in August 2014

Browse Current Events by year

2014

Browse Current Events by month

Get trending consumer news and recalls

    By entering your email, you agree to sign up for consumer news, tips and giveaways from ConsumerAffairs. Unsubscribe at any time.

    Thanks for subscribing.

    You have successfully subscribed to our newsletter! Enjoy reading our tips and recommendations.

    Feds say USA Discounters scammed military consumers; refunds pending

    CFPB: Stores tricked service members into paying for legal protections they didn't need

    USA Discounters, Ltd., has been ordered to stop what federal consumer protection officials say is a fee scam and to refund about $400,000 to consumers who fell for it.

    The company operates a chain of retail stores near military bases, offering supposed discount prices and "easy" financing to military consumers. But the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) says at least one of the company's many deals isn't so great.

    The CFPB says USA Discounters tricked thousands of servicemembers into paying fees for legal protections servicemembers already had and for certain services that the company failed to provide. The CFPB has obtained more than $350,000 in refunds for servicemembers harmed by this scam, and USA Discounters will pay an additional $50,000 civil penalty.

    “Today we shut down USA Discounters’ fee scam that was designed to exploit unsuspecting servicemembers,” said CFPB Director Richard Cordray. “USA Discounters charged servicemembers for legal protections they were already entitled to, and for services that were never actually provided. Targeting servicemembers with scams disguised as legal benefits is unconscionable, and we will not allow this injustice to continue.”

    Credit Relief Act

    The Servicemembers Civil Relief Act (SCRA) provides special legal protections to active duty servicemembers. Active duty servicemembers had to agree in a contract with USA Discounters to pay a $5 fee for a company called SCRA Specialists LLC to be their representative for their rights under the SCRA.

    USA Discounters portrayed SCRA Specialists as an independent representative that would be available to receive notices of lawsuits filed by USA Discounters, inform USA Discounters of a change in the servicemembers’ address, and verify servicemembers’ military status to determine whether the servicemember was eligible for protection under the SCRA.

    These services were characterized as a benefit to servicemembers, but they only helped USA Discounters sue servicemembers. In addition, many of the services were never actually performed. USA Discounters also misrepresented SCRA Specialists as an independent company working on servicemembers’ behalf, when in fact SCRA Specialists’ sole source of revenue was USA Discounters’ customers, the CFPB charged.

    USA Discounters gave $4.50 of each $5 fee to SCRA Specialists. The fee was charged in more than 70,000 contracts and generated more than $350,000 since 2009.

    CFPB’s order requires USA Discounters to:

    • End unfair and deceptive practices: USA Discounters can no longer market these contracts as a benefit to servicemembers and cannot pretend that SCRA Specialists is an independent company.
    • Stop charging SCRA-related fees: USA Discounters may not charge a fee for any SCRA-related service involving credit it extends.
    • Provide over $350,000 in restitution to servicemembers: USA Discounters is required to make full restitution to all eligible consumers for the $5 SCRA Specialists fee, plus interest. For consumers who repaid their installment accounts, USA Discounters will mail a check for the full $5 plus interest. For those consumers whose account is in collection, their debt will be discharged the $5 fee plus interest.
    • Pay a $50,000 penalty: USA Discounters will pay a $50,000 penalty to the CFPB’s Civil Penalty Fund.

    USA Discounters, Ltd., has been ordered to stop what federal consumer protection officials say is a fee scam and to refund about $400,000 to consumers who...

    August still a good time to buy a new car

    Slowing sales increase dealers' motivation to deal

    August has traditionally been thought of as the optimum time to buy a new car. Next year's models are rolling off the assembly line and dealers are in the mood to strike a bargain.

    But in recent years manufacturers have often introduced next year's models throughout the year, lessening the August crush. Has that changed August's reputation as the time to buy?

    Even though it might not be the hot month it once was, automotive site TrueCar.com says August is  still a month of good deals. In fact, it finds August's average transaction price of $29,296 is the lowest of the year, with July second at $29,465.

    In particular, August appears to be an ideal time to buy a large SUV, with the average savings totaling $474. The best month for a midsize car, however, is June.

    Hot deals

    Kelley Blue Book (KBB), another automotive publication, lists what it says are August's hottest deals, led by the Fiat 500. KBB says the car can be leased for $99 a month for 24 months, with $2,389 due at signing.

    "Compact and midsize sedans are among the most popular segments in the United States, and this month consumers will be able to find red-hot deals on the Toyota Camry, Ford Fusion and Chevrolet Cruze," said Jack Nerad, executive editorial director and executive market analyst for KBB. "As a new-model year nears, car shoppers will also discover great values in luxury cars, SUVs and pickups."

    According to KBB, the Cruze may be leased this month for $159 a month for 36 months, with $1,849 due at signing. If you've thought about moving up to a luxury car, the Cadillac ATS carries a lease payment of $299 a month for 36 months and $1,689 due at signing.

    KBB notes some attractive cash-back deals this month as well. Ford is offering $6,000 back on the Expedition and Fiat is offering $3,000 back on the 500.

    Toyota will give back $1,000 on the Camry and offer 0% financing for qualified buyers. Mazda offers the same deal on the CX-9.

    $199 leases

    Edmunds.com, another automotive site, finds August's lease deals particularly attractive. It highlights a handful of models that can be leased this month for $199 a month.

    They include the Buick Encore, GM's small crossover SUV. Edmunds notes the lease might not be suitable for all drivers – its term is 39 months and it allows about 800 miles per month of driving. The $4,269 or $3,769 due at signing for current non-GM lessees is for the two-wheel-drive, base Encore but differs according to state and location.

    The Ford Escape is Ford's popular small SUV. Its $199 lease payment is for 24 months and requires $2,769 at signing, $80 less than last month's offer. The front-drive, four-cylinder Escape is an all-around family car but hardly up for off-road romping – or extended road trips for that matter, since the mileage allowance is less than 1000 miles a month.

    The Honda Accord LX Sedan can also be leased for $199 a month, with a 36 month term. The lease terms are best for those in 23 states, where a relatively low $1,999 is due at signing. Elsewhere, the drive-away cost is $2,499.

    Motivated dealers

    One reason dealers may be willing to strike attractive deals this month is a troubling trend in auto sales. Sales have been red hot for most of the year but have noticeably cooled over the summer.

    This week the government reported July's retail sales were slower than expected, in part because of weaker car sales. Figures released by the Census Bureau show sales by auto and other motor vehicle dealers were down 0.2%. If that sector is excluded, overall sales inched up 0.1% for the month.  

    August has traditionally been thought of as the optimum time to buy a new car. Next year's models are rolling off the assembly line and dealers are in the ...

    Samsung, T-Mobile, MetroPCS sued over 911 service

    FCC guidelines require wireless carriers to provide 911 location information

    Two years ago, in September 2012, the family of a murdered woman named Deanna Cook filed suit against the city of Dallas and its police department.

    The lawsuit claims that when Cook called 911 to report that her estranged husband broke into her house and was attacking her, dispatchers waited 10 minutes before sending any officers to Cook's house, and furthermore than the officers took 50 minutes to arrive, after stopping at a 7/11 to make “personal purchases” and at another home to inspect a burglar alarm.

    This week, Cook's family also sued Samsung and the cell-phone service providers MetroPCS and T-Mobile over their handling of Cook's ill-fated 911 call and location information.

    The family filed the new suit on Aug. 13. Two days later, Courthouse News Service  reported that, according to the new lawsuit, “Cook died as the 911 operator and police dispatcher were unable to timely obtain Ms. Cook's home address, leading to a delay in responding to her life-threatening 911 call. This delay prohibited police and first responders from timely providing police protection and/or medical attention to Ms. Cook, thus allowing her to die.”

    The suit says that during the 911 call, while Cook was “screaming at the top of her lungs in fear,” an operator told her “MetroPCS doesn't always have addresses.”

    Since 2006, FCC guidelines for wireless carriers have required that mobile phone companies provide 911 operators with longitude and latitude coordinates (to within 300 meters) for any mobile 911 callers.

    wo years ago, in September 2012, the family of a murdered woman named Deanna Cook filed suit against the city of Dallas and its police department....

    Get trending consumer news and recalls

      By entering your email, you agree to sign up for consumer news, tips and giveaways from ConsumerAffairs. Unsubscribe at any time.

      Thanks for subscribing.

      You have successfully subscribed to our newsletter! Enjoy reading our tips and recommendations.

      Consumers prefer human to online financial advisors

      44% report having a personal financial advisor

      Online financial advice is more available than ever but U.S. consumers are more likely to have a dedicated financial adviser than to use a financial website for obtaining advice on investing or planning for their retirement, 44% vs. 20%, a new survey finds.

      More investors also report using either a financial advisory firm that gives them access to live advice through a call center (35%) or a friend or family member (29%) to advise them than using a financial website.

      These findings are based on a Wells Fargo/Gallup Investor and Retirement Optimism Index survey conducted in late June and early July. The survey is based on a nationally representative sample of U.S. investors with $10,000 or more in stocks, bonds, mutual funds, or in a self-directed IRA or 401(k).

      Among U.S. investors, retirees and investors with $100,000 or more in invested assets are significantly more likely than their counterparts to use a dedicated financial adviser. Nonretirees are more likely than retirees to use financial websites or to rely on friends and family.

      Overall, 79% of investors report using at least one of the four financial advice resources tested, while 21% don't use any of the four. The largest percentage of investors -- 40% -- rely on just one source, but almost a third (30%) rely on two, 7% on three, and 2% on all four.

      Part of what may be suppressing investors' use of online financial resources is that less than a third of investors -- 30% -- say they are "very comfortable" using online or mobile technology for their investing or financial advice needs. While another 27% are somewhat comfortable, 43% say they are not comfortable with this.

      There is a strong generational skew in these attitudes, with 66% of nonretirees indicating at least some level of comfort with online financial advice tools, compared with 35% of retirees. Additionally, men have a higher comfort level than women. 

      Online financial advice is more available than ever but U.S. consumers are more likely to have a dedicated financial adviser than to use a financial websit...

      State fair foods vary widely but they're mostly fried

      You can have almost anything you want at the fair, as long as it's fried

      Anything is fair game when it comes to food at the state fairs and this is fair season for most of the country.

      Some fair food trends of recent years include deep-fried everything, bacon-wrapped meat, foods on a stick, gourmet versions of comfort food (think “mac-and-cheese croquette”), and new takes on old favorites, like Pepsi-infused funnel cakes. Any remake on a stick seems to have been a big hit.

      Some of the many decadent, over-the-top new foods that debuted at state fairs in 2013 include:

      • Deep-fried brownie on-a-stick
      • Bacon-wrapped riblet on-a-stick
      • Funnel cake sundae
      • Fried pickles ’n’ chocolate
      • Candied bacon cannoli

      So what has 2014 rocked our guts with?

      At the 2014 Florida State Fair, one of the first state fairs of the year, The trends were set with burgers that seemed to be the new food to reinvent. The Iowa state fair and Minnesota state fair followed suit. Here are some things on the try-it-at-least-once list:

      • Ramen noodle burger (burger on bun made of ramen noodles)
      • Tornado dog (hot dog wrapped in spiral-cut potatoes and deep fried)
      • Bacon maple funnel cake
      • Healthier burger (soy burger on whole wheat bagel thin)
      • Cotton candy funnel cake

      What about gluten-free?

      Celiac support groups in Iowa got together and made a virtual spreadsheet for fair-goers to sort through gluten-free choices like a jumbo marshmallow on a stick.

      Iowa's not the only state to put gluten on a stick. Minnesota had a local group that whipped up a gluten-free beer-battered brat. Gluten or not that fried stuff slides down the same ole way.

      We suggest avoiding any fair rides until you digest your fried whatever it is you just ate.

      Anything is fair game when it comes to food at the state fairs and this is fair season for most of the country....

      Watch out for fraudulent Ebola treatment products

      The hustlers are pushing something that doesn't exist``

      It was bound to happen. As soon as consumers became concerned about the Ebola outbreak, the scam artists, con men and other lowlifes would start coming out of the woodwork.

      To that end, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is advising consumers to be aware of products sold online claiming to prevent or treat the Ebola virus.

      Since the outbreak of the Ebola virus in West Africa, the FDA has seen and received consumer complaints about a variety of products claiming to either prevent the Ebola virus or treat the infection.

      It's a lie

      There are currently no FDA-approved vaccines or drugs to prevent or treat Ebola. Although there are experimental Ebola vaccines and treatments under development, these investigational products are in the early stages of product development, have not yet been fully tested for safety or effectiveness, and the supply is very limited.

      There are no approved vaccines, drugs, or investigational products specifically for Ebola available for purchase on the Internet. By law, dietary supplements cannot claim to prevent or cure disease.

      The FDA is warning those individuals promoting these unapproved and fraudulent products to take immediate action to correct or remove these claims or face punitive action.

      CDC: No U.S. risk

      It is important to note that according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Ebola does not pose a significant risk to the U.S. public. Unfortunately, during outbreak situations, fraudulent products that claim to prevent, treat, or cure a disease all too often appear on the market. The FDA monitors for these fraudulent products and false claims and takes appropriate action to protect consumers.

      Ebola is the cause of a viral hemorrhagic fever disease. Symptoms include fever, headache, joint and muscle aches, weakness, diarrhea, vomiting, stomach pain, lack of appetite, and abnormal bleeding. Symptoms of the virus can appear anywhere from two to 21 days after exposure, but is most commonly seen on days eight to10.

      In the U.S., Ebola is not a water-borne or food-borne illness and is not transmitted through the air. It is spread through direct contact with the body fluids of an infected person, or with objects like needles that have been contaminated with the virus. People who do not show symptoms are not contagious.

      If you have seen these fraudulent products or false claims, report them to the FDA.

      It was bound to happen. As soon as consumers became concerned about the Ebola outbreak, the scam artists, con men and other lowlifes would start coming out...

      McCormick Ground Oregano recalled

      The product may be contaminated with Salmonella

      McCormick & Company is recalling McCormick Ground Oregano, 0.75-oz. bottle, UPC 0-523561-6 with code dates BEST BY AUG 21 16 H and AUG 22 16 H.

      The product may be contaminated with Salmonella. No other McCormick Ground, Whole or Oregano Leaves products are affected.

      No illnesses have been reported to date in connection with this problem.

      The product subject to this recall is:

      • McCormick Ground Oregano 0.75-oz bottle, UPC NUMBER: 52100003566 (as seen on label: 0-523561-6), MCCORMICK ITEM NUMBER: 900356, AFFECTED DATE CODES: BEST BY AUG 21 16 H, BEST BY AUG 22 16 H, SHIPPING DATES: April 4, 2014, to August 5, 2014

      The product was shipped domestically to Alabama, Arizona, California, Colorado, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Iowa, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Massachusetts, Maryland, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Mississippi, Montana, North Carolina, North Dakota, Nebraska, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Virginia, Vermont, Washington, Wisconsin and West Virginia.

      Internationally, the product was shipped to Aruba, Bahamas, Bermuda, Indonesia, Jamaica, Netherlands, Puerto Rico, Singapore, Thailand and the Virgin Islands.

      The recall affects 1,032 cases that were shipped on the affected date codes.

      Consumers do not need to return the product to the store where it was purchased. Instead, they should dispose of the product and its container.

      Consumers may contact McCormick consumer affairs at 1-800-632-5847, weekdays from 9:30 AM to 8:00 PM (ET, for a replacement or full refund, and with general inquires.

      McCormick & Company is recalling McCormick Ground Oregano, 0.75-oz. bottle, UPC 0-523561-6 with code dates BEST BY AUG 21 16 H and AUG 22 16 H. The produc...

      Gulf States Toyota recalls Tundras

      The lug nuts to loosen

      Gulf States Toyota (GST) is recalling 16,249 model year 2013-2014 Toyota Tundras modified by GST as part of certain vehicle packages to be equipped with a combination of non-Toyota-brand 20-inch alloy wheels and chrome plated lug nuts.

      The coating on the lug nuts may give, causing the lug nuts to loosen or the wheel studs to fracture. The wheel could separate from the vehicle, increasing the risk of a crash.

      GST will notify owners, and dealers will replace 20 lug nuts and torque them to specification, free of charge. The recall is expected to begin in August 2014.

      Owners may contact GST customer service at 1-800-444-1074.

      Gulf States Toyota (GST) is recalling 16,249 model year 2013-2014 Toyota Tundras modified by GST as part of certain vehicle packages to be equipped with a ...

      Fuel leak prompts recall of Arctic Cat snowmobiles

      Leaking fuel poses a fire hazard

      Arctic Cat of Thief River Falls, Minn., is recalling about 3,260 Arctic Cat snowmobiles.

      Fuel can leak from the fuel line assembly, posing a fire hazard.

      No incidents or injuries have been reported.

      This recall involves model year 2014 Arctic Cat XF 7000 and ZR 7000 and model year 2015 XF 7000 and ZR 7000 snowmobiles. They were sold in a variety of green, black, orange and white color combinations. All XF and ZR 2014 models are included in this recall.

      Recalled 2015 model vehicles have the last six digits of the vehicle identification number (VIN) in the following ranges: 100920 through 100993 for the XF 7000 models and 100792 through 100919 for the ZR 7000.

      The fourth and fifth digit of the VIN, “14” or “15,” correspond to the model year. The VIN appears on a sticker attached to the chassis near the rider’s right foot rest. The model name appears on the front sides of the snowmobile.

      The snowmobiles, manufactured in the U.S., were sold exclusively at Arctic Cat dealers nationwide from June 2013, to August 2014, for between $12,000 and $14,500.

      Consumers should stop using the recalled snowmobiles immediately and contact an Arctic Cat dealer to schedule a free repair. Arctic Cat is contacting its customers directly.

      Consumers may contact Arctic Cat at (800) 279-6851 from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. CT Monday through Friday.

      Arctic Cat of Thief River Falls, Minn., is recalling about 3,260 Arctic Cat snowmobiles. Fuel can leak from the fuel line assembly, posing a fire hazard. ...

      Vornado Air recalls electric space heaters

      The heater can overheat and cause the units to melt

      Vornado Air of Andover, Kan., is recalling about 79,000 electric space heaters.

      The heater can overheat and cause the units to melt, catch fire and ignite nearby items, posing a fire and burn hazard to consumers.

      The company has received 29 reports of units overheating and melting, including 7 reports of heaters catching fire, resulting in 1 report of smoke inhalation and 1 report of property damage caused by soot and smoke.

      This recall involves Vornado VH110 Whole Room Vortex electric space heaters sold in two colors -- black and white. The heaters measure about 10.5 inches high, 9 inches deep and 10.5 inches at the base growing narrower at the top.

      The on/off switch and the high/low heat settings are located on top of the unit. The Vornado logo appears with a gray “V” on the front of the unit. Recalled heaters have the numbers 1 and 3 as the fourth and fifth digits of the serial number. The model and serial numbers appear on a silver decal located on the bottom of the unit.

      The space heaters, manufactured in China, were sold at Bed Bath & Beyond, Home Depot, Menards, Orchard Supply, Target and other retailers nationwide and online at Vornado.com and Amazon.com from June 2013, through May 2014, for about $60.

      Owners should immediately turn off and unplug the electric space heater and contact Vornado for instructions on how to receive a free replacement unit, including free shipping.

      Consumers may contact Vornado toll-free at (844) 205-7978 from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. CT Monday through Friday.

      Vornado Air of Andover, Kan., is recalling about 79,000 electric space heaters. The heater can overheat and cause the units to melt, catch fire and ignite...

      Experts disagree over how you should brush your teeth

      Researchers say dental profession should get on the same page

      Your parents probably taught you how to brush your teeth when you were just a toddler. Chances are, your method hasn't changed much over the years.

      But is it the correct way? You might be surprised to learn that hardly anyone agrees.

      Researchers at University College London (UCL) have consulted all the authorities, from dentists to dental associations. They even asked toothpaste companies what is the correct way to brush teeth.

      The answers were not consistent. In fact, the researchers say they were “unacceptably inconsistent.”

      The researchers say they even consulted dental textbooks and found no clear consensus between the various sources about how to brush and how long to brush. It's not a trivial matter, they insist.

      Confusion

      "The public needs to have sound information on the best method to brush their teeth," said Aubrey Sheiham, senior author of the study. "If people hear one thing from a dental association, another from a toothbrush company and something else from their dentist, no wonder they are confused about how to brush.”

      In the U.S., the American Dental Association (ADA) offers these guidelines:

      • Place your toothbrush at a 45-degree angle to the gums.
      • Gently move the brush back and forth in short (tooth-wide) strokes.
      • Brush the outer surfaces, the inner surfaces, and the chewing surfaces of the teeth.
      • To clean the inside surfaces of the front teeth, tilt the brush vertically and make several up-and-down strokes.
      • Brush your tongue to remove bacteria and keep your breath fresh.

      Twice a day

      Britain's National Health Service says you should brush twice a day for 2 minutes at a time. As for when you should brush, NHS recommends just before bedtime and any other time during the day – just not right after a meal.

      “Never brush your teeth straight after a meal as it can damage your teeth. This is especially important if you've had fruit, fizzy drinks, wine or any other food that contains acid because tooth enamel is softened by the acid and can be worn away by brushing,” NHS advises.

      Crest toothpaste echoes the NHS advice but goes into less detail. It also urges twice daily brushing, spending 30 seconds on each quadrant.

      "Dental associations need to be consistent about what method to recommend, based on how effective the method is,” Sheiham said. “Most worryingly, the methods recommended by dental associations are not the same as the best ones mentioned in dental textbooks. There is no evidence to suggest that complicated techniques are any better than a simple gentle scrub."

      Narrowing it down

      What method to the researchers favor? They point to what they say is the most commonly-recommended technique – gently jiggling the brush back and forth in small motions, with the intention of shaking loose any food particles, plaque and bacteria. However, they note that no large-scale study has ever shown this method to be any more effective than basic scrubbing.

      Sheiham, meanwhile, favors the brushing method advocated by the ADA.

      "To avoid brushing too hard, hold the brush with a pencil grip rather than a fist,” Sheiham said. “This simple method is perfectly effective at keeping your gums healthy.”

      Sheiham also says there is little use in brushing after eating sweets or sugary drinks because it won't prevent tooth decay. It takes bacteria from food about two minutes to start producing acid, so if you brush your teeth a few minutes after eating sugary foods, the acid will have already damaged the enamel.

      Your parents probably taught you how to brush your teeth when you were just a toddler. Chances are, your method hasn't changed much over the years....

      The small fortune hiding in your loose change

      Your nickels and old pennies might be too valuable to spend

      The good news is, I've discovered what I call the “Instantly Double Your Money With Hardly Any Effort At All Plan” which, as the name suggests, enables anybody living in the United States to double their cash value without even having to work all that hard.

      The bad news is, the plan's thoroughly illegal and has been for 8 years now: a federal felony punishable by up to 5 years in prison and $10,000 in fines.

      So you definitely should not do this — at least, not yet. But there is a very good chance the plan's criminal status will be revoked sometime in the next decade or two, which means you can still use this plan to more than double your money with little effort — though you'll need to wait a few years.

      How does the plan work? Easy: just hang on to your pocket change — or at least certain denominations of it.

      If you're an American adult of any age, all your life you've heard about “inflation” or “the shrinking dollar” – basically, your money is worth a little bit less each year, and the same number of dollars that indicated solid prosperity in Grandma's day equals literal poverty now.

      This is especially noticeable if watch old movies or TV shows, and pay attention whenever they discuss finances. Consider this line from the opening scenes of the 1948 movie Mr. Blandings Builds His Dream House, a screwball comedy about a rich Manhattan executive who decides to live in the wild and untamed suburbs of Connecticut:

      Jim Blandings is part of the fabric of this town. … Jim's one of those bright young men from Yale. Advertising business, lovely wife, two fine kids, makes almost fifteen thousand a year.

      “Almost” $15,000 a year made a four-person family in 1948 rich! Compare that to 2014, when a four-person household living on $23,850 per year or less is officially below the poverty level (and four people trying to live off twice that much still aren't doing very well).

      Metal is worth more

      So the dollar keeps shrinking yet our coins remain the same size, which causes (and has caused) genuine problems for the U.S. Mint, when the metal required to make a coin is worth more than the coin itself. That explains various coin changes in living memory: until the end of 1964, for example, all U.S. dimes, quarters, half-dollar and dollar coins were minted out of silver.

      But rising silver prices (or the steady decline in the value of the dollar, whichever you prefer) eventually made silver too expensive to use as everyday currency, so starting in 1965, all formerly silver coins were minted out of copper and nickel layers — hence the little brown or red stripe you see on the rims of any dimes and quarters in your pocket right now. On the off-chance you see a dime, quarter or half-dollar without that reddish-brown rim, check the date: if it's 1964 or earlier, you have a valuable little piece of silver in your hands.

      As of August 13, with silver trading at $19.81 per ounce, a pre-1965 silver Roosevelt dime is worth $1.43 for the silver alone, a pre-1965 Washington quarter contains $3.85 worth of silver, and a pre-1965 Kennedy or Franklin half-dollar is worth $7.16 (all values courtesy Coinflation.com).

      Of course, even if you're scrupulous about checking the rims and dates on your pocket change (you'll also want to keep an eye out for any part-silver World War Two nickels, with their mint marks centered above Monticello on the “tails” side of the coin), you're not likely to come across many silver coins in circulation these days.

      A penny for ...

      Yet even without silver, there remain in circulation many common coins whose metal is worth more than their face value: mainly, copper pennies minted before the middle of 1982.

      Modern pennies are made of zinc with a very light copper coating, and zinc is close to worthless. The actual metal in a modern zinc penny is worth a mere .005 of a cent: 200 pennies contain only one cent's worth of zinc.

      Yet until mid-1982, pennies were made of copper. The Mint stopped making copper pennies in the early '80s for the same reason it stopped minting silver coins in the '60s: because the shrinking dollar relative to metal prices made it too expensive.

      At today's copper prices, a copper Lincoln penny is worth slightly more than two cents for the metal alone (in addition to any collector's value such an old coin might have).

      So any penny in your pocket dated 1981 or earlier is worth at least double its face value – except it's illegal to melt copper Lincoln pennies for scrap metal, and illegal to melt Jefferson nickels too (except for the silver war nickels). That's been the case since 2006, when rising metal prices, especially copper and nickel, meant it would actually be profitable to melt down certain coins in circulation — hence the then-new law making it illegal to do that, or to export such coins out of the country for melting.

      The director of the U.S. Mint released a statement at the time, justifying the law by saying, “The nation needs its coinage for commerce … We don't want to see our pennies and nickels melted down so a few individuals can take advantage of the American taxpayer. Replacing these coins would be an enormous cost to taxpayers.”

      So ever since 2006 it's been illegal to melt pennies or nickels for their metal content. The metal in a five-cent piece is currently worth slightly less than five cents, but when metal prices were high in 2011 the metal value rose to almost 7 cents — which is why there's a good chance the composition of the coins we call “nickels” is likely to change in the next few years, too. The Mint has been seeking Congressional permission to make cheaper nickels since at least 2012.

      Coin cache

      However: although you may neither melt pennies and nickels nor ship them overseas, on pain of prison and a $10,000 fine, it is legal for you to withdraw such coins from circulation by adding them to your own personal coin collection, whether that collection's stored in an elegant display case, old coffee cans in the back of your closet, or even a guarded warehouse.

      In 2011, a hedge-fund manager in Dallas made headlines after he bought $1 million in face-value nickels – 20 million five-cent coins in all – and stored them with the expectation that sooner or later, the ban on melting copper pennies and copper/nickel nickels will be lifted, and he'll have a warehouse full of bullion to sell at a profit.

      Similar melt bans have been lifted before: the ban on melting silver dimes, quarters and half-dollars ended in 1969, presumably after Congress or the Treasury Department decided “Silver is too valuable to keep such a large supply of it locked up in relatively low-value currency.”

      And given how the U.S. dollar is worth slightly less every year – meaning the value of copper, nickel and other metals will continue to rise relative to the cash spending value of a U.S. penny or five-cent piece – sooner or later Congress or the Mint will make a similar calculation about the valuable copper and nickel locked away in our lowest-value coins.

      Even if you're not a wealthy hedge-fund manager with a million dollars and a secure storage warehouse to spare, you can still set aside any good pennies and other coins you find in your pocket change – and if you have an account with a brick-and-mortar bank, they'll probably give you free paper coin-roll wrappers if you ask. They'll also sell you a roll of 40 nickels for two dollars — though if you want to and can afford to buy a million dollars' worth of nickels, you'll have to skip the bank and make formal arrangements directly with the U.S. Mint nearest you.

      The “Instantly Double Your Money With Hardly Any Effort At All Plan” lets you double your cash value without even having to work too hard...

      New Jersey sues "As Seen on TV" promoter

      Our own readers' complaints about Telebrands sound suspiciously similar

      If you watch any television at all, you're probably familiar with those commercials hawking amazing “As Seen on TV” products, almost always sold by the New Jersey-based company Telebrands.

      But this week, on Aug. 13, New Jersey's Attorney General and Division of Consumer Affairs jointly filed a complaint against Telebrands, alleging that the company “violated the Consumer Fraud Act through its practice of aggressively upselling products through its automated phone system and websites, failing to provide means for consumers to opt out of the ordering process, shipping and billing for products not ordered by consumers, and using misleading advertisements, among other violations.”

      In other words, the authorities say, if you tried to buy only one item from Telebrands you often found yourself billed for several, with no means of cancelling the order. This all sounds very similar to complaints we've collected from our own readers who ordered things from Telebrands.

      A week before New Jersey authorities made their announcement about Telebrands, James from Oregon wrote:

      First off, the entire order process was automated, which I actually prefer! So far, so good. My order was placed, but I had to begin navigating a lengthy labyrinth of 'But wait, we have more deals for you!' …. 'BUT WAIT, for only ** more you get freeeeeeee shipping AND MOOOOORE' …. 'BUT WAIT!!!!! For only X more dollars, we will throw in a $40 gift card to Walmart AND a $15 rewards to Telebrands!...'”

      Guaranteed ... sort of

      James finally navigated the labyrinth and placed his order — in early January. His shipment didn't arrive until mid-May, and he discovered the product wasn't as great as the advertising made it seem. Luckily, Telebrands offers a 100% satisfaction money-back guarantee — except, James said, this only applies within 30 days of placing your order, and he didn't receive his until two months after the guarantee window had already closed. No refund for James.

      But at least he got a $40 Walmart card and $15 Telebrands voucher, right?

      “I examined the gift card that came in the box for the $40 to Walmart. It tells me I'm actually signing up to be eligible to possibly receive a gift card at the cost of $15.99 a month. No thanks, but I was charged for it anyways. How about this voucher for $15 for Telebrands? Seems legit so far when entering the code. All of a sudden, it gives me an error message saying it's expired?! It doesn't expire till August 8th! I call customer service, no answer, call again, no answer....”

      You don't need a mathematician to figure out that paying $16 per month to “possibly” receive a $40 gift card is a very bad deal. It sounds as though Telebrands had enrolled James in their “Everyday Family Savings” program or something similar.

      New Jersey authorities mentioned this program in their Aug. 13 report. When the Attorney General's office and Division of Consumer Affairs investigated Telebrands, they had staff members go “undercover” placing phone and online orders for various Telebrands products. Here's what happened when a DCA staffer tried ordering a “Pocket Hose”:

      … the Telebrands IVR System requested that the Division of Consumer Affairs investigator provide an email address. Two days later, the Division investigator received an email under the heading of “Welcome to Everyday Family Savings” which stated that he would be enrolled in the “Everyday Family Savings” program at a cost of $19.95, which would automatically renew each month unless he called that day to cancel. During the order of the Pocket Hose, Telebrands did not disclose to the Division investigator that he was being enrolled in the “Everyday Family Savings” program.

      More like a sprinkler

      Some of our readers also tried buying Pocket Hoses as well, and were not impressed with their quality. Sherrill from Texas said this in July 2013: “Hose started leaking within a couple of days. It was more like a sprinkler than a watering hose. Now today while putting leaking part of hose in flower bed, the hose got a big bubble on it and blew up. Horrible product.”

      The same month, Susie in Indiana told us this: “We purchased two Pocket Expandable Hoses in April 2013. We expected the hoses to last more than two months. We had other hoses that lasted years. While they did expand and retract, both hoses' external material ripped away from the nozzle and the rubber internal hose developed a large bubble and burst on both hoses. Both hoses also could not be tightly attached to the spigot.”

      Luckily, Susie bought her hose in a retail store rather than ordering direct from Telebrands, so she was able to return it for a full refund. Even so, she warned: “We were very disappointed in this product, would not purchase in the future, and would not recommend to others.”

      Susie's story likely would've had a less-happy ending had she ordered the hose directly from the Telebrands website or phone number. New Jersey's Office of the Attorney General says that Telebrands operates like this:

      The state’s complaint alleges that consumers calling the company’s toll-free numbers were generally connected to the Telebrands Interactive Voice Response (IVR) System, an automated phone ordering system, rather than a live customer service representative. The state’s complaint further alleges that through its Telebrands IVR System, the company subjected consumers to a lengthy ordering process, sometimes lasting over half an hour; offered additional products, yet failed to provide a mechanism to decline the offer; aggressively solicited orders for additional products (e.g., during undercover Instabulb purchase, soliciting for at least seven additional products); failed to provide consumers with an opportunity to confirm the merchandise order prior to authorizing charges; charged and shipped additional merchandise that the consumers declined to purchase while placing an order [and] …. failed to provide consumers with the opportunity to edit their virtual “shopping cart,” thus resulting in consumers’ ordering products they neither intended nor wanted to order ….

      “Failed to provide consumers with the total cost of their orders?” Yeah, James from Oregon complained about that too: “The bill in the box tells me I was charged $58 for the order. Which confuses me that $70 was taken for the order (especially since shipping and processing was free).”

      Honest mistake?

      Tina from Illinois told us of similar problems back in April – although Tina chalked it up to an honest mistake, rather than a deliberate policy as the New Jersey authorities later alleged:

      I ordered from this company for a product that they advertise. Due to some computer/internet issues, there were multiple orders placed for the one item when I only wanted one. I called the customer service number immediately after I realized the error and was "guaranteed" that I would only get ONE item and not multiple - this was Saturday. On Monday I saw that there were still 3 of the same product under different order numbers being ready to process. I called again to the customer service number. …

      Today my charge card was charged for three of the same item. …

      Such complaints have been going back for years. In 2011, Daryel from Detroit wrote us with a complaint that sounds almost exactly identical to what New Jersey's attorney general alleged three years later:

      I ordered an Aluma Wallet and because of the way it is represented online, it is totally confusing and I ended up with 5 wallets instead of 2. Of course none of this showed up until the item was ordered. There was no preview.…

      Daryel spent the next couple days making phone calls, waiting on hold and collecting verbal assurances that he would only receive and be charged for two wallets, not five. And, to make a long story short: despite multiple promises that his order was put on hold and he'd never ever be charged for more than two wallets, he was charged for five anyway. After giving the long version of his story, he summarized its high points by saying:

      I am officially disputing this order because:

      1. I was misled by the online advertisement as to how many I ordered.

      2. They told me the order was on hold and it wasn't (in fairness to them, one person said it wasn't a guarantee) but they play with your mind or at least their people are trained to.

      3. I was told it was being processed and could not be cancelled then told it was already shipped.

      4. The total of what I ordered was supposed to be one wallet for $10.99 upgrade the order to a higher quality wallet for 15.98 plus a free one for only $4.99 shipping. The total was supposed to be $20.98 and not $59.20.

      The New Jersey AG and Division of Consumer Affairs say that any consumers who think they have been scammed by Telebrands can file a complain with the State Division of Consumer Affairs by calling 1-800-242-5846 (toll free within New Jersey) or 973-504-6200 if out of state.

      If you watch any television at all, you're probably familiar with those commercials hawking amazing “As Seen on TV” products, almost always sold by the New...

      Best checking accounts for students

      Some banks offer incentives for teens to open accounts

      Having a checking account can help a teenager develop good financial habits and improve their ability to manage their money. Personal finance experts believe it can be a helpful tool in teaching financial literacy.

      But the banking landscape today is far different than it was a generation ago. Even many working adults find a checking account is unaffordable because of the growing number of fees.

      For that reason a teen must be careful about selecting both a bank and an account. Otherwise, the financial lesson won't be positive but painful.

      The personal finance website WalletHub has prepared a study of what it calls the Best Student Checking Accounts for 2014. Accounts were chosen for a lack of fees and a generous amount of services and features.

      Best overall

      AmericaNet Rewards Checking and Evantage Bank Rewards Checking tied in the Best Overall category. Both won points for not charging a monthly fee and giving account holders the potential to earn 1.5% APY on all balances up to $10,000.

      To earn interest on the account consumers must post and clear 10 debit card sales transactions and enroll electronically. If they meet that condition they aren't charged out-of-network ATM fees and can get a $25 monthly refund for surcharge assessed by an ATM owner.

      Students with little money may have a problem because many banks now require a minimum balance in a checking account, or they impose a monthly fee. Earning honors for Best Account for Cash-Strapped Students is Simple Checking, offered by Bancorp Bank.

      It has no initial deposit requirement and no monthly fee. As an added bonus it has free ATM withdrawals at thousands of Allpoint locations and no fees for overdrafts or having insufficient funds.

      Getting rewarded

      Students who would like a rewards checking account might think they're out of luck. Those accounts seem like they would be hard to come by for teens. But they aren't.

      The Bofi Federal Bank Rewards Checking Account has no fees and free ATM withdrawals. It pays 1.25% APY on the account balance.

      The rewards kick in when you receive at least $1,000 in direct deposits each month and make at least 10 debit card purchases. At that point your money earns an extra 0.4166%.

      Even better, American Airlines Federal Credit Union Priority Checking pays 2.27% APY on all balances up to $5,000, as long as membership requirements are met. It has no monthly fee and airline staff, their families and permanent household members are eligible.

      The First Merchants Bank National Association Student Checking Account gives 1 point for every $3 spent in signature transactions. Users get 0.28% cash back when when they redeem in the form of gift cards. It takes $100 to open an account and there are no monthly fees. The first 5 non-bank ATM charges free.

      Parents can help

      Parents play a major role in helping a teen establish a checking account. For starters, it's usually the parent who suggests it.

      According to Bankrate.com, most banks require a parent to be the co-owner of a teen's checking account. It cites Wells Fargo's Teen Checking accounts as an example. Parents have full access to alerts, parental controls and their child's accounts.

      A checking account can also be a useful tool to teach the principals of financial literacy. And a little help may be in order.

      Results of an international financial literacy test, released in June, show U.S. teens rank between their Latvian and Russian counterparts when it comes to knowledge about money. The test measured the knowledge of 29,000 15 year-olds in 18 countries.

      Having a checking account can help a teenager develop good financial habits and improve their ability to manage their money. Personal finance experts belie...

      Beef inspection procedures streamlined

      Finding and removing contaminated products faster is the goal

      The federal Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS) plans to implement procedures that it says will help it trace contaminated ground beef back to its source more quickly, get it out of stores and prevent a recurrence.

      “A critical component of preventing foodborne illness is quickly identifying sources of contamination and removing unsafe products from store shelves,” said Brian Ronholm, Deputy Under Secretary for Food Safety. The expedited traceback procedures, he said, “will allow FSIS to take action more quickly, which will make a significant difference in food safety investigations and in preventing foodborne illnesses.”

      Springing into action

      Under the new traceback procedures, FSIS will conduct immediate investigations at businesses whose ground beef tests positive for E. coli O157:H7 during initial testing and at suppliers that provided source materials. These traceback investigations will begin as soon as FSIS receives a presumptive positive result and the grinding facility can provide supplier information.

      Previously, FSIS began investigations at the grinding facility only after a presumptive positive test result was confirmed, which can take two days. A similar investigation of the grinding facility’s suppliers would have taken place 30 days later, and more intensive investigations of suppliers will now also begin immediately. Beginning investigations at the point of a presumptive positive test result can save FSIS valuable time.

      As part of the traceback investigation, FSIS will review establishment records to determine whether the grinding or supplying establishment’s food safety system experienced a breakdown. The agency will also determine whether the supplying establishment shipped product that may be contaminated to other grinding facilities or further processors. If so, FSIS will take steps to have that product removed from commerce.

      FSIS estimates that dozens more recalls may occur once these new protections are in place.  

      The federal Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS) plans to implement procedures that it says will help it trace contaminated ground beef back to its so...

      Feds approve new type of sleep drug

      Risks include driving and having sex while not fully awake

      People who have a hard time falling and staying asleep (insomnia) have a new option.

      The Food and Drug Administration has approved Belsomra (suvorexant), an orexin receptor antagonist -- the first approved drug of its kind. Orexins are chemicals that are involved in regulating the sleep-wake cycle, and play a role in keeping people awake. Belsomra alters the signaling action of orexin in the brain.

      “To assist health care professionals and patients in finding the best dose to treat each individual patient’s sleeplessness, the FDA has approved Belsomra in four different strengths – 5, 10, 15, and 20 milligrams,” said Ellis Unger, M.D., director of the Office of Drug Evaluation I in the FDA’s Center for Drug Evaluation and Research. “Using the lowest effective dose can reduce the risk of side effects, such as next-morning drowsiness.”

      Belsomra should be taken no more than once per night, within 30 minutes of going to bed, with at least seven hours remaining before the planned time of waking. The total dose should not exceed 20 mg once daily.

      Impairment possible

      The most commonly reported adverse reaction reported by people taking the drug in clinical trials was drowsiness. Medications that treat insomnia can cause next-day drowsiness and impair driving and other activities that require alertness. People can be impaired even when they feel fully awake.

      The FDA asked the drug manufacturer, Merck, Sharpe & Dohme Corp., to study next-day driving performance in people who had taken Belsomra. The testing showed impaired driving performance in both men and women when the 20 mg strength was taken.

      As a result, the FDA recommends that patients using the 20 mg strength be cautioned against next-day driving or activities requiring full mental alertness. Patients taking lower doses should also be made aware of the potential for next-day driving impairment, because there is individual variation in sensitivity to the drug.

      Like other sleep medicines, there is a risk from Belsomra of sleep-driving and other complex behaviors while not being fully awake, such as preparing and eating food, making phone calls, or having sex.

      Chances of such activity increase if a person has consumed alcohol or taken other medicines that make them sleepy. Patients or their families should call the prescribing health care professional if this type of activity occurs.

      Effective use

      The effectiveness of Belsomra was studied in three clinical trials involving more than 500 participants. In the studies, patients taking the drug fell asleep faster and spent less time awake during the remainder of the night compared to people taking an inactive pill (placebo).

      Belsomra was not compared with other drugs approved to treat insomnia, so it is not known if there are differences in safety or effectiveness between Belsomra and other insomnia medications.

      Belsomra will be dispensed with an FDA-approved patient Medication Guide that provides instructions for its use and important safety information.  

      People who have a hard time falling and staying asleep (insomnia) have a new option. The Food and Drug Administration has approved Belsomra (suvorexant), ...

      Jobless claims tick higher

      Analysts are wondering if this was an aberration

      After averaging below the 300,000 mark for the last few weeks, first-time applications for state unemployment benefits have jumped higher.

      The Labor Department (DOL) reports initial claims totaled a seasonally adjusted 311,000 during the week ending August 9 -- up 21,000 from the previous week. Economists surveyed by Briefing.com were calling for a total of 305,000.

      During the weeks the total was below 300,000, the DOL said there were no special factors involved. Withe the return to a figure above that level, DOL continues to maintain there nothing unusual going on.

      Analysts say if claims remain at their current level, the summer-time drop was likely due to poor seasonal adjustments. If however, they drop back to the lower level, it may be that the labor market is truly repaired.

      The 4-week moving average, which smooths out the volatility of the weekly number and is considered a more accurate gauge of the labor market, rose 2,000 to 295,750.

      The full report may be found on the DOL website.

      After averaging below the 300,000 mark for the last few weeks, first-time applications for state unemployment benefits have jumped higher. The Labor Depar...

      New Jersey sues puppy dealer

      Prada Puppies sold sick dogs to consumers, state charges

      New Jersey has sued Prada Puppies and its owner, Jessica Durkin, charging that they sold sick puppies to consumers without providing the veterinary exams that are required by state law.

      The Salem, N.J., company also allegedly failed to provide the animal history state law calls for and refused to pay refunds or reimburse consumers for the cost of caring for the sick puppies.

      “Families who bring a new puppy into their home will bond with that pet very quickly,” Acting Attorney General John J. Hoffman said. “Those who purchased sick puppies from this defendant – including the family that had to have their new pet euthanized – suffered on behalf of their animals and because of the defendant’s alleged failure to disclose health information or provide reimbursement for purchase and veterinary costs. We are pursuing full restitution for those consumers.”

      The state alleges that Durkin charged between $300 and $450 for the sale of Jack Russell terriers, Cavalier King Charles spaniels, Yorkshire terrier/poodle mixes, and Maltese/poodle mixes. She advertised the puppies on the Prada Puppies website, www.pradapuppies.com, as well as on various dog breeder and dealer websites and in the South Jersey Times newspaper.

      Examples cited

      On at least four occasions between November 2012 and January 2013, Durkin violated New Jersey’s Consumer Fraud Act and Pet Regulations in connection with the sale of puppies that turned out to be sick and in need of expensive veterinary treatment.

      For example, on December 19, 2012, a family purchased a Yorkshire terrier/poodle mix puppy from Durkin. The animal quickly became ill with hypoglycemia, severe diarrhea and anemia, and was nearly comatose when the family brought it to a veterinary clinic five days later, the lawsuit said. On December 27, 2012, eight days after its purchase, the family decided to euthanize the extremely ill puppy.

      In November 2012, a Jack Russell puppy developed a severe cough four days after a family purchased it from Durkin. The family brought the animal to a veterinarian who diagnosed and treated it for bacterial bronchopneumonia.

      In January 2013, a family took a Cavalier King Charles puppy for a veterinary exam one day after purchasing it from Durkin. The veterinarian found that the animal was suffering from ear mites, yeast infection of the ears, giardia (a parasite that invades the small intestines) and an upper respiratory infection.

      In January 2013, a family brought a Maltese-poodle mix puppy to a veterinarian three days after purchasing it from Durkin, because the puppy exhibited vomiting, diarrhea and extreme head-shaking. The vet determined that the puppy suffered from giardia, coccidia (another parasite that invades the intestines) and ear mites.

      Durkin refused to provide refunds on these and other occasions, despite the fact that in each case a veterinarian determined within 14 days of purchase that the animals had been unfit for sale, the lawsuit alleges.

      In such cases, the seller must honor the customer’s choice to either return the pet for a full refund plus the payment of veterinary costs, or to keep the pet and receive reimbursement for past and future veterinary costs up to the original purchase price.

      New Jersey has sued Prada Puppies and its owner, Jessica Durkin, charging that they sold sick puppies to consumers without providing the veterinary exams t...

      Back-to-school: it adds up

      Families will spend an average of $670 on school supplies this year

      Sharpen your pencil, we are going to talk back to school and how it all adds up. You might want to sit at your desk as we go through these numbers.

      The National Retail Federation predicts that families will spend an average of $670 on back-to-school shopping (including clothes, school supplies and electronics), up 5% from last year. Total spending on back-to-school-shopping is predicted to reach nearly $75 billion, 3% higher than last year.

      Not only are kids supposed to bring crayons but there is a whole new list and it starts with a T: Technology. In that big backpack that makes kids walk funny are USB drives and things like that. Let's face it -- they aren't even teaching cursive writing in some schools anymore because most things are done on computers and it's becoming obsolete. 

      Budgets are tight in school districts and that throws more of a burden on parents to supply cleaning supplies, tissues for all the runny noses. copy paper and printer ink. It's tough for families that are already struggling financially and are worrying about new clothes and shoes let alone staples for school.

      Ways to save

      The good news is there are ways to save, whether it's magic markers or ipads.
      Walmart, Staples and Target offer the best deals for the paper and paste list . You just may have to buy in bulk or buy generic -- meaning, go with the colors of red, black or blue ,no commercial covers for binders. Not always the most popular choice but gets the basic requirements out of the way. Tell your kids they can put stickers on them!

      Book covers can be done with the good ole paper bag that is making a resurgence in the grocery stores.

      As for technology, resellers like Amazon and Best Buy often have deals on big-brand computers and tablets.

      Other tips include sticking closely to the list provided by your child’s teacher and scoping out your local dollar store for supplies like scissors and pencil boxes. Be inventive -- host a back-to-school swap and shop. Get parents together and recycle those scientific calculators they HAVE to have.

      Retro is in and thrift stores can be a blast if you sell them the right way to your kids -- twice as many clothes at half the price.

      Of course everyone needs a new do for school and beauty colleges are always looking for someone to do a makeover on, again much less expensive then the commercial salons. All this saving and you might have enough left over for Christmas!

      Sharpen your pencil, we are going to talk back to school and how it all adds up. You might want to sit at your desk as we go through these numbers....