CarMax Reviews

4,934,369reviews on ConsumerAffairs are verified
  • We require contact information to ensure our reviewers are real.
  • Our moderators read all reviews to verify quality and helpfulness.
  • We use intelligent software that helps us maintain the integrity of reviews.

About CarMax

Pros
  • Quick process
  • Transparent pricing
  • Positive vehicle performance
Cons
  • Frequent mechanical issues
  • Poor communication from staff
  • Warranty coverage disputes

CarMax Reviews

Filter by Rating

  • (173)
  • (44)
  • (37)
  • (128)
  • (1,210)

Popular Mentions

    How do I know I can trust these reviews about CarMax?
    • 4,934,369 reviews on ConsumerAffairs are verified.
    • We require contact information to ensure our reviewers are real.
    • We use intelligent software that helps us maintain the integrity of reviews.
    • Our moderators read all reviews to verify quality and helpfulness.
    Top reviews
    • Top reviews
    • Recent
    • Oldest
    • Most helpful

    A link has directed you to this review. Its location on this page may change next time you visit.

    How do I know I can trust these reviews about CarMax?
    • 4,934,369 reviews on ConsumerAffairs are verified.
    • We require contact information to ensure our reviewers are real.
    • We use intelligent software that helps us maintain the integrity of reviews.
    • Our moderators read all reviews to verify quality and helpfulness.
    Page 11 Reviews 1637 - 1837

    Reviewed June 27, 2009

    On May 26, 2007, I purchased a 2002 Cadillac Escalade EXT. On June 25, 2009, I went to Patrick BMW to purchase a car using the Cadillac as a trade-in. From Patrick BMW, they pulled a carfax (vehicle history report). That's when I found out #1: The mileage on the Cadillac was not the actual mileage. #2: The Cadillac had been in an accident. #3: There is a problem with the title. All these things were in the carfax report from Patrick BMW.

    When I purchased the Cadillac from Carmax, they said and I signed an Odometer Disclosure Statement stating that the Odometer was the actual mileage and they did not tell me the Cadillac was in an accident. I would have never bought it. In addition, the Cadillac is financed through Capital One Auto, so I didn't know that there was a problem with the title. Carmax did not give me any information or choose not to tell me about the Cadillac. I paid $26,738 for this Cadillac with $15,000 down. Patrick BMW said the Cadillac trade is $5,000.00 because of the problems that were reported from carfax.

    Thanks for your vote!

    Reviewed June 21, 2009

    I bought a 2005 Grand Jeep Cherokee on 1-21-09. When I purchased the car, they asked if I wanted the extended warranty, which I purchased. On 6-12-09, the transmission on my car went out, so I took the car to CarMax and was informed it was covered under my extended warranty as well a loaner car. Several days later, I was told the car is not covered under extended warranty and that the original manufacturer's warranty drive and train should cover it. I contacted the manufacturer and they said that the drive train had expired because it was never transferred over to the second owner. I informed them when I purchased the car no one ever mentioned that. I was only asked if I wanted the extended warranty and what it covered through CarMax.

    The manufacturer said that the CarMax extended warranty would cover it. I spoke with Annette several times and she stated that her operations manager and she both agreed that the extended warranty should cover the car. She also stated that the extended warranty did not want to cover it because they feel the drive train warranty should cover it. Meanwhile, with them going back and forth, I have a rental car that they are telling me I have to pay for, as well as a $100 deductible and towing of car to CarMax of $130. All of which my extended warranty says that they cover: a $50 deductible and loaner car and towing. They have still not fixed the car after a week. All I have been told is that my car is at an auto shop and they were going to look at it.

    Thanks for your vote!

    Reviewed May 27, 2009

    My 2000 Ford Explorer's transmission died as soon as the extended warranty was up. It only has 80000 miles on it and now I'll have to pay close to 3 grand to fix it. I have had several problems with the car during the time it was under warranty and I had to pay 50 dollars to car max each time. During the first month of owning it the brakes needed to be worked on. The car once started smoking and a fuse had to be replaced. The rear wiper broke. The radio has broken twice. The handle on the passager side fell off. I also had to pay about 500 dollars to fix the door because it would not unlock. There have been numerous fuel system issues as well.
    Thanks for your vote!

    Reviewed May 27, 2009

    i purchased a 2006 envoy in march 2009 and while getting an oil change and 27 point inspection at a chevy service center, i was told that the noise i was hearing was the idler wheel pulley.  i called carmax and scheduled an appointment for them to check out the findings.  they called me later in the day to not only confirm the pulley being bad but to also state that the control arm, serpintine belt, and another belt needed to be replaced as well. i was then told that the warranty does not cover the belts and it would cost me $67.00 for the belts plus the $50.00 deductible.  i paid $1789.00 for an extended warranty which seems to be a joke.  the carmax warranty program is a rip off as well as their so called recnditioning program.  if my vehicle was put through a 127 point inspection as carmax proclaims they do, why were'nt the control arm and the pulley problems found in stead 2 months after the vehicle was sold.  also, having customers spend at least $1000.00 or more for a warranty and then charge them a deductible for each visit is wrong and dose'nt seem like a fair practice.  it should be looked into.
    Thanks for your vote!

    Reviewed May 18, 2009

    Purchased a 2004 Volvo S80 from Carmax with an extended warrarenty for an additional $2000.00 . So the car would not start in Feb 2009, so I contacted Carmax to have it repaired.They took it to Osteen Volvo to have the "specialist " repair it. Waited 15 days for an ignighter to come from Sweden. The Carmax tech picked it up and less than 20 miles down the road it caught on fire. Car is a total loss. The fire investigator hired gave cause as unidentified some where in the headlight area.The fuse panel was ok. So basically it was a freak fire? You will never convince me of that. Allstate is giving me fair market value based on Car Trader Ads- like I would buy a used car out of some one's drive way. Only I still owe another $8000.00. Once again a past Volvo owner gets screwed because of a fire? The car warrenty company was too eager to send back my refund and of couse Carmax was too eager to help and now I know why. Also Car Max and Allstate do not sell GAP insurance which would have covered this difference but dont sell it on used cars more than 2 years old. Again I the consumer lose. I will never buy another Volvo or a used car from CarMax. Volvo's are flamers so be careful. If you see smoke get out and get away from the car.
    Thanks for your vote!

    Reviewed May 8, 2009

    on the 4th of December i purchased a Nissan Quest when i went for the test drive i heard a knocking so i let them hear the knocking and the sales person told me its just because the van was cold and need warming so we let the van warm up then the knocking went away but it came back the following day so they keep saying bring it in so they can look at it but still they keep saying the reason why its knocking it need to change the oil so we let them changed the oil then the knocking was gone for couple hours then it came back again so they said its the transmission we changed the transmission get a different transmission then the same evening the same problem so we keep bringing it back like 7 times and it still keep messing up know they saying its the motor please can someone tell me whats the best way to go bye this can i hired a lawyer help me pleasae.
    Thanks for your vote!

    Reviewed April 27, 2009

    I purchased Mercedes ML 500 from car max in San Diego at 27000 miles and reported the break problem within weeks of purchase they attempted to fix but in vain now the car has 35000 miles. The car is beautiful and the brand Mercedes was the reason for purchasing my car.
    I am really disappointed with the car because of the horrible Break Squeak. It is dangerous and disappointing to drive the car with horrible break squeak. I do not feel comfortable pressing the break because I do not like the sound of squeak and it scars me even more. I almost had an accident while backing up. When I backed up my car it squeaked badly and I stopped the car and restarted again in the mean time person walking on the street thought that I had stopped for him and started walking behind the car. I almost ran over him and I had never seen him. Car Max has attempted to fix the problem many times and in vain.
    Thanks for your vote!

    Reviewed April 26, 2009

    Okay. Here is my story and I never thought that I would have a bad thing to say about Carmax. I have purchased 4 vehicles from them 2 new and 2 used. I had purchased a 01 Lincoln Town Car 18 months ago and had decided to trade up to newer and a bit smaller car. I drove 4 hours to get to the dealer because they had the car I wanted. I never thought I'd be driving back without trading. I got there and the salesman was absolutely stunned at the superb condition of my car. When I got it it was still a bit dirty and I had completely detailed it and had kept it in showroom new condition. I had all the service records since owning it in the glove box proven the car had been meticulously maintained.
    I drove the car I came to buy and it was great. So then this guy went to do the "evaluation" of my car. Now when I purchased the car 18 month before it had supposedly gone through the extremely thorough check they do for vehicles. I had only drive 12123 mile since purchasing it. I paid 11,999 for the car. Now when the price they would pay came back, 3500! Yep, the wonderful car they had sold me was now a piece of junk in their eyes. And the guy that did the evaluation was extremely rude and very insulting. In point of fact, I have never been so insulted in my life. I walked out with him basically still shouting at me that the car was now "worthless" and would have to be auctioned off. How did it happen that in 18 months the car went from a Featured vehicle to an auction item???? I was so upset but not deterred. I went to my local Mercedes dealer where they had a pre-owned event going on. I was treated as a valued customer and respected. I had parked my car over by the cars for sale while test driving the one I liked. Another customer came by and thought that it was ready for sale, it was that clean. While I was buying the car I drove he was ready to buy my old one. So much for a car worthy of only auction! The car I bought was certified, came with a paid up warranty to 100k miles and I got over 8k for my trade and paid 4 k less for a very comparable car and this one came with a warranty that Carmax would have had me pay 1600 for! They said they had never seen a car in such clean and wonderfully kept condition! Carmax, after 4 cars you have lost a customer for life. Next time you want to insult a good customer, hope they can recover and get an even better car at an even better deal like I did. Yep, Camax sucks!
    Thanks for your vote!

    Reviewed April 20, 2009

    I purchased a 2002 Mazda Tribute with extended warranty from CarMax in April 2007. Within 6 months, the transmission failed. I towed it back to the CarMax Service Center in Torrance, CA for repair. After a week in their shop, they told me they had rebuilt the transmission and fixed the problem. Three days later, I had to take it back for the same reason except, this time, the transmission fluid had flushed into the radiator and had damaged the radiator. They told me they had to replace the radiator along with the transmission problem. I left my truck there again for a second time for another week. They again told me they had fixed the problem and, in addition, replaced the radiator.

    Two weeks later, I returned the truck for a third time with the same complaint, the transmission problem. The truck was left there for an additional week to have the problem fixed. I picked up the truck once again and, a month later, I came back to drop it off for a fourth time. Only this time, I asked to speak with a service manager due to the constant problem I was dealing with. I insisted they take my truck elsewhere to get it fixed because they were not fixing the problem at all. The manager promised me he would finally take my truck to another shop to fix the problem.

    I left my truck for another week, hopefully, to get my truck fixed for good. It is now 6 months since the first initial repair and my truck once again is having the same exact problems I have been taking it in for the past 4 times now. I still have warranty on my truck but I have decided to file a complaint instead. The time, effort, mileage, frustration, and days off I have to take from work just is not worth it. So now, I have to look to get this problem fixed by my own account with my own money to ensure things get done properly, no thanks to CarMax.

    Thanks for your vote!

    Reviewed April 13, 2009

    This is actually a positive report. I bought a 2000 Chevy Blazer in 2006, with high mileage, and purchased the Carmax extended warranty. It is a pain that there's a $50 deductible for each and every item I bring it in for, even if I'm bringing it in with multiple issues at one time. But I think that the investment of the additional warranty was a good investment for me. I had a warped oil pan on my truck. I was out of the truck for a couple of days because the part isn't something that the local parts stores carry, but they set me up with a rental car and gave me a $25/day allowance for it. This single repair almost matched the cost of the warranty, but it's been in there for a bunch of other things: the door hinges, the rear hatch, mismatched tires that they replaced, the cruise control, the air conditioning, a broken seat adjustment handle, etc.

    Now while I had a positive experience with the extended warranty and all of the people in the service department, I still paid too much for my truck. When they compare the sticker price to the NADA value, they are using the very top end of the scale. My truck should have cost less than it did with the amount of miles on it and the features that it was equipped with from the factory, but that's a different issue.

    Thanks for your vote!

    Reviewed March 23, 2009

    My experice with carmax has been a disaster. CarMax is good at building illusions, just a few examples, when you visited the lot, did you notice that the cars that had been test driven by victims had a SOLD card hanging from them, and how they have this so called REJECT cars inside their buildings, that's the illusion they sold me thinking that i was purchasing a good quality car, just like they say they would. i purchased a Nissan maxima '08 with 622 miles, in feb/08, at carmax in duarte,ca. my car started giving me problems with the door locks, the brakes, the radio, the alarm, and the Air Conditioning condensation hose that was no were to be found, all condensed vapor was turing into water and filling up my car with it. i purchased the extended warranty, but carmax has it's customers use the manufacturers warranty before they are willing to spend any money to fix the cars that were supposed to be fixed before they put them up for sale. i spoke an an employee named jose and told him about the problem that the car was having. he told me to bring the car in, i asked him if the service department was open on the weekend he told me NO. I have a busy schedule and it's quite difficult for me to bring the car in for service on a weekday, so the next time i could bring my car in it was about 4 weeks after i had purchased the car. i took my car to the carmax store that's located in burbank,Ca. i was the first customer there and i spoke to a service agent named Lilian Lazo, i explained to her what the issues were with my car and what i had spoken to jose a couple a weeks prior. My car on paper it sounds like a good buy: '08 maxima with 622 miles. So i told lilian that what was going on with my car was unacceptable because first of all this issues should have been taken care of before the car was put up for sale, second why should a car this new have all this problems. her words were well you bought a used car, the first thought that came to mind was to cuz her the out, but i remained calm. she made it seemed like it was my fault the car was in the state that they sold it to me in. my car still has the door lock problems, it also has developed other problems, my transmission is sluggish, a loud noise has developed when i back up, a clicking noise coming from one of the axles, my electronic key doesn't repond all the time, and no dealer knows what the problem is, or they don't want to deal with it because i didn't make the purchase with them. my recomendations to anyone trying to purcahse a car from Carmax. DON'T DO IT!!, you'll regret it if you do. They don't care for their customers, all they care about is finding ways to rob you for your car and money. you would think those are harsh words, but take one step in my shoes and you would find a few more and better words to describe them. IF YOU'RE PLANNING TO PURCHASE A CAR FROM CARMAX, DON'T DO IT!!!!! you're going to regret it if you do, i have shared my experience with my friends and family that have been thinking of purchasing cars from them. i have stopped them from becoming the next carmax victims. THE WAY CAR BUYING SHOULD BE what a joke for a mission statement...
    Thanks for your vote!

    Reviewed March 10, 2009

    I purchased a 2001 Isuzu Trooper from CarMax in Sterling, VA in Feb. 2007. No major problem with the car at all. The car ran absolutely perfect until I took it in Feb. 2008 for and inspection and oil change. When I picked it up I IMMEDIATELY notice that something was wrong with it, so I called and took it back in to ask what they did to my car! Because when I dropped it off it was fine. Of course, they denied doing anything wrong but I knew that they did. I took it by another mech. who told me that the tech, probably when doing the oil change puncture something to cause the EGR Tube to damage. I was furious because I knew that they were responsible for this problem but they refused to admit to it. They give me an estimate to repair for $329.00 but I refused to pay them one cent. The car still drive, but it has a little noise from the exhaust. In the meantime I purchased another car to drive. The following year I take it back to CarMax for an inspection to see what they would say... they tell me that it fails cause of the ERG tube! So now I am steaming MADD because not only they are the cause of this problem pervious but they are now charging me $655.55 to fix it! I am still so mad that I can't even get everything out! CarMax Techs are so incompetent.
    Thanks for your vote!

    Reviewed Feb. 3, 2009

    Two months after we purchased a used 2001 Volkswagen Beetle GLS TDI from CarMax, at $16,394.86, including an extended warranty program, after CarMax assured us that it never was involved in an accident. Unfortunately, the car caught fire, while we were driving it to Tampa, FL to visit a family member, having surgery in Sarasota, FL.
    Other motorists on I-75 alerted us that the car was on fire and to pull of the highway. Thanks to them, we got out of the burning car just in time, and we watched helplessly while the car burned to the ground, before the fire engine arrived.
    Thanks for your vote!

    Reviewed Jan. 16, 2009

    My wife and I purchased a 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee Laredo from CarMax. Along with the car, we purchased the extended warranty.Shortly after the front passenger heated seat caught fire.I called Carmax and spoke with the service department and explained in detail what had happened. I asked them to tell me what was covered under the warranty. The service manager told me the electrical system and electronics were covered.The service manager told me that the "heated seat catching fire was not mechanical failure".I told him that is not what the fire department said when they were putting out the fire! The service department told me I needed to contact my insurance company. I researched this problem and discovered that there was a Chrysler recall on an 04 jeep for the front passenger seat heat element malfunction and that is had been documented and known to cause a fire.I called the service department the next day and asked if CarMax does a safety inspection. The service department went on and on about how they do a 125 point inspection. I asked if they checked recalls for my jeep and they flat out stated that they forgot.Forgot to check for recalls on a car that they are selling? A recall for a potential interior fire? My 3 year old and 12 year old daughters were just in this car! The service manager "Joulian" told me that CarMax gave me a packet from the Manufacture to fill out and send in to the manufacture to be alerted of any recalls. I said "you bought the car first to resell it to me... did you fill out the friggin' packet.You just sold us a car that had a "DEALER Recall" for a documented Mechanical Failure which could result in a fire. That recall had been issued for 2 and a half years before we bought the car from you..
    Thanks for your vote!

    Reviewed Jan. 6, 2009

    I purchased a 2005 Chevy Trailblazer from CarMax in December 2008. Within 3 days of having the vehicle the check engine light comes on along with a tighten fuel cap message. Check engine light still on after the fuel cap is tightened. I call CarMax and they tell me to bring the vehicle in so they can reset the computer. One day later the check engine light comes on again. I again call CarMax and am advised to bring the vehicle back in. They hook up my truck to a computer and find out it has something to do with the emissions. They turn the check engine light off and replace the fuel cap thinking it is either broken or needs replacing. The light comes on yet again and again I'm off to CarMax. They replace the filler neck (attachment to the gas tank) and turn the check engine light off. Within two days the light comes on again. I am livid at this point and tell them to keep the truck until it is fixed or give me a new truck. They keep my truck over the weekend and give me a loaner vehicle. They call me and tell me they FINALLY figured out what was wrong with the truck (something about a switch near the engine)....OK, like I know what they are talking about. They said they have some bad news though.....UH OH! While my vehicle was parked in their parking lot waiting for me to pick it up a NAPA auto parts driver backed into my truck causing minor damage to the tailight, paint, bumper and quarter panel. At this point my boyfriend and I know the vehicle is cursed and I spoke with John (Operations Manager) about getting another vehicle because I was over the Trailblazer. John agreed and I came in to look at something else. I decided on a 2005 Dodge Durango. CarMax in Jacksonville, FL didn't have one I liked so Lea (Office Manager-I think) told me they could transfer another Durango from the Florida district to the CarMax in Jacksonville, FL at no extra charge! I found one I liked in Sanford, FL and the transfer was done. I received a call the nexr day from Lea saying I could come and get my new truck! YEAH.....I test drove it and loved it and was on my way...or so I thought. Less than a week after getting my Durango the brakes started squeaking. I called CarMax and they told me to bring the truck in. I did and they gave me another loaner and told me they would call me when they figured out what was wrong. I got a phone call a couple hours later saying the rotors and brakes had to be re surfaced (which they did) and the truck was ready for pick up. Not even half way home the brakes started squeaking again! I couldn't believe it! Then the next day as I was coming home from running errands I came to a 4 way stop and out of no where the truck stalled (after my boyfriend filled it up with gas)! I called Carmax and they told me to bring it in...AGAIN!!!!!!! I did and they said the truck stalling was possibly due to gunk build up (which they cleaned). I now have to go to CarMax yet again and have them fix what they were supposed to fix last week!! I am so over CarMax and their sh*tty way of fixing vehicles.
    Thanks for your vote!

    Reviewed Jan. 4, 2009

    I purchase my vehicle in May of 2008, and from day 1 it has had several problems. Within the seven (7) days of purchase, I attempted to get some commitment from the dealership in taking the vehicle back, as stated in their marketing commercials. However, they avoided my calls, toss me from person to person with promises of getting back to me. I couldn't camp out, because I have a job, but I continue to call them with little response from CarMax. The return calls I did receive from them, they patronized me, and one manager told me that how would I know something was wrong with my vehicle I was not a mechanic. While the gentleman is correct, I am not a mechanic, however, I am driving the vehicle and even my three (3) year has said, our car is sick and smokes a lot? I was devastated, the seven (7) days were up, and I remember just crying. I have two (2) girls, I'm working to keep us together, financially supporting all of us, and a car I am paying for that needs major vehicle repair.

    The vehicle had a thirty (30) day warranty on the vehicle, and major brake and oil leak problems. However, again attempting to get someone to speak with me and work with resolving my now vehicle problems was exhausting. I was told by CarMax that I could no longer speak with any member in the sales department or manager, only directed to the car service department. There, the staff was verbally abusive, they were argumentative and I have not been able to get any type of guarantee in standing behind the industry integrity in fixing my car. I called their consumer relations department and they responded once, however, the manager there refuses to call me back. I have NEVER purchased a pre-own vehicle, however I am a single parent and felt this was my only option. I now have a large debt to pay on a broken down vehicle I cannot drive because of safety reasons. My vehicle STOP at a stand still in the middle of a interstate highway with my three (3) year in the back seat.

    I was, we were both terrify, the vehicle stopped abruptly that there was no time to move to the shoulder. Vehicles in all directions were honking and blowing their horns, justifiably. We survived that nightmare, but the vehicle is broken down. Now, I find myself very depress and ill from this I have no way to get back and forth, especially to work to pay on my broken down vehicle. I've missed work a lot and calling CARMAX again is depressing, terrifying and exhausting. Each time, it's another argument, they have perfected this whole scam of taking advantage of people like me who have no other options. Ugh. It's hard. I am so depress.

    Thanks for your vote!

    Reviewed Nov. 22, 2008

    On November 2, 2008, I purchased a used car from Carmax. Before I committed to the purchase, I was told by the salesman, Dennis Strine, that the tires had 40,000 miles of use remaining. When I had two independent professionals check out the car, they said the tires had about one month of use remaining. When I took the car back to Carmax on November 21, within the 30-day Limited Warranty period, service Manager Chris Anderson said there was nothing he could do to compensate for the salesman's misinformation. He estimated a new set of tires would cost approximately $700. I asked him if he would compensate me a few hundred (50%) for what I'll need to pay within the next month. He said no.
    Thanks for your vote!

    Reviewed Oct. 22, 2008

    I brought this vehicle from Car Max in the summer of 2005 for $16,188.13. In fact I pay the vehicle off in 2006. Since I have had this vehicle, I have had to have repairs done to the vehicle every 3 to 4 months. Now that my warranty has expired as of August 16, 2008, I am still having problems with vehicle repairs. Consequently the reoccurring vehicle repairs that I am having problems with are in some way related to a past repair that Car Max supposedly performed. CarMax has performed repairs on my vehicle regularly and it has been to no avail, they supposedly fix the ball bearing on the vehicle which this was the third repair related to the ball bearing since I have had the vehicle.

    Unfortunately, they did not put everything back together properly because they left the back plate down that is located near my brakes causing my brakes to grind. I brought the vehicle back to them the next day and the mechanic corrected this error however, my brakes continued to squeak from the initial damage done by the back plate being left down obstructing my brakes. Note: A manager from CarMax delivered my car to my house which means he drove my car all the way to me (5 miles approximately) while/with the brakes grinding. Because the brakes continued to squeak, I insisted that they repair the brakes since I knew it would not be covered under my warranty. CarMax reps. insisted that they would take a look at the vehicle to make sure they did nothing wrong.

    Unfortunately letting CarMax's mechanics work on my car was a mistake because when I got the vehicle back it was squeaking even louder in fact, whatever they did to my car it caused the anti lock brake light to come on and stay on. This is not the first time that their mechanics failed to properly repair my vehicle and put the parts back correctly. One time there where suppose to be and electronic concern and when the car was returned to me it was back firing so I took the vehicle back to them and found out through their own admission that the mechanic had not grounded the wires properly therefore, causing the vehicle to back fire. Now that my car is being serviced by real mechanics at Dominion Chevrolet, it has been brought to my attention that my brake rotors didn't appear to be new and Car Max's mechanics swore that they repair and/or put new rotors on the vehicle in 2005.

    They even tried to convince me that the rotors on a vehicle can go bad before the breaks shoes go bad. Note: The brake shoes that CarMax replaced back in 2005 when they supposedly replaced the rotors are still on the vehicle and they're in good condition according to the Mechanics at Dominion Chevrolet, however we just cant seem to figure out how purposely brand new rotors became so rusted that they need to be replace and the brake shoes are still in good working condition. In fact CarMax cannot explain to me how brand new rotors seem too had worn out before the brake shoes; however, CarMax's mechanics swear/swore that they put new brakes and new rotors on the vehicle between the first or second month of me having the vehicle.

    In a nut shell Car Max has been performing patch work on my vehicle for 3 three year therefore, billing the warranty company for repairs that I don't feel warrant guaranty. Now that they can no longer rob me of a fifty dollar deductible and/or the warranty company for the remaining balance for repairs since, the warranty expired on August 16, 2008. CarMax is refusing to honor their 6000 miles warranty for services performed. They are refusing to fix my vehicle for repairs that they performed incorrectly and/or without care at the time of services leaving me carless. Max Car reps have kept my vehicle for 30 days and periodically weeks at a time try to get my car to duplicate a repeated problem, one of the service supervisor explained to me that they in fact, wet the car down as though it were raining to recreate the environment in which the problem seemed to be occurring (My window on the passage and drivers side was getting stuck down during rainy weather) this went on for 30 days.

    In fact after speaking with the warranty company I discovered that repairs that should have been submitted to the warranty company where not submitted. Moreover CarMax reps supposedly replaced my ignition switch however; they don't seem to have any records of this repair. Although CarMax claims to have no record of this repair, according to Dominion Chevrolet mechanic the ignition switch is not a GMC manufactured switch and/or cylinder therefore, causing my key to stick in the and the indicator lights to light up in the dashboard of my car and I am still having problems with the ignition switch. Note that the flashing indicator lights in the front panel of the car have been a reoccurring problem since, I brought the vehicle in 2005 and presently it is still a problem.

    I have part of the 14 paged itemized document of services supposedly performed coupled with my individual receipt of services. In addition, I noticed that the customer service reps for repairs seemingly where attempting to avoid recording my every concern when I would bring the vehicle in for services therefore I kept documentation on what my complaints where at the times of services so I documented conversations with managers Aaron..Charley. The current problem is that Car Max put a supposedly, New a radiator on my car,? within the last 3-4 month with a 6000 miles warranty however, when Car Max install the radiator the mechanics are not sure whether they performed a pressure test therefore, I have a leaking lower intake gasket that is related to the repair that CarMax perform.

    Additionally the vehicle is stalling when I press the accelerator pedal and the engine is making a roaring sound when I press it however, if I turn the vehicle off and then on again it works properly, as if it the electrical units reprogram/reloads causing the vehicle to accelerate property when I press on the pedal. Sometimes I have to turn the ignition switch/vehicle off/on several times before I can move my vehicle because, of this electrical problem. I am not past the 6000 miles warranty and Car Max is still refusing to repair my car. I want CarMax to fix/repair my vehicle properly as promised by their reps so many times in the past. It is unreasonable for CarMax to refuse to fix my vehicle when they know that they are liable for the damages done to the vehicle and/or failed repairs.

    I am willing to mediate this matter reasonably however, if CarMax insists on ignoring my concerns by not paying for the vehicle repairs and/or refusing the alternative as listed below then I would like my money back $16,188.13 and this amount includes financing, in which case I will endorse the title to CarMax. Should CarMax decide to accept this offer they will also be responsible for paying any pending repair fee in order to obtain physical possession of the vehicle. Plus I would like for CarMax to refund/reimburse me for each paid out deductibles for the warranty that expired on 8/16/2009 since, those repairs were not perform properly and/or not at all. Primary Concerns/Issues: Dishonest Practices, Repairs, Service, Warranty, Customer Services. Car Max Reps actions/practices have been dishonest by omitting parts of the repair concern from Customer Concern Documentation.

    Failing to repair my vehicle properly, Failing to honor the 6000 mile warranty for services rendered, Damaging my vehicle due to improper repair practices, Defrauding the warranty company by receiving payment for service not perform and/or not performed improperly and by submitted multiple claims for the same repairs. Selling me a car under warranty then refusing to make restitution by repairing the problems. Failing to produce proper documentation for repair supposedly performed. Misleading me as a customer by claiming to have perform services when in fact, services have not been performed and/or not performed properly Alternative: Pay for the current repairs. Reactivate the extended warranty that expired on 8/16/2008 extending it to (8/16/2011 and/or 50, 000 miles with a $50.00 deductible and the same coverage options, until such time that the warranty has been reactivated, I would like for CarMax to paid Dominion Chevrolet for the current and needed repairs until the warranty is reinforced.

    If CarMax is not willing to except the alternative above then I am asking that CarMax pay for Dominion Chevrolet to fix all needed repairs since, the vehicle has/will not pass inspection in its current condition. During the warranty period, CarMax was responsible for all repairs necessary to make the vehicle mechanically operational and sound. Since the vehicle was in the shop so often for repairs during the warranty period, the warranty should have been extended for each day the vehicle was in the shop for repair. Under the Federal Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act since I purchased a warranty from CarMax according to the law, which requires that the warrantor repair the vehicle within a reasonable number of attempts and a reasonable amount of time, CarMax is responsible for my vehicle repairs.

    Thanks for your vote!

    Reviewed Oct. 16, 2008

    I purchased my used 2001 Volvo XC70 certified car from Carmax in Rockville, MD. They were going to fix two problems and never did. Now it is breaking down constantly; each time I take it to the local dealer, I spend more money to get the same repairs repeatedly done. It does not always go into gear, the ignition sticks, it jerks during driving, I buy good gas, gas treatment, etc. I bought this thinking it was a good investment car and I would not have to spend $$ on repairs; I am in credit card Hades debt due to car repair costs. HELP. Dealer ignores my pleas to handle recalls and fix without a fee. Do I cut my losses and trade? I have spent almost 4000 just this summer.

    Thanks for your vote!

    Reviewed Sept. 30, 2008

    I purchased a 2001 BMW 325i on September 10, 2008. Out of the 19 days that I have owned the car, it has been in the Carmax Service Center for 17 days.

    On the day that I purchased the vehicle, September 10, there was a problem with the heater, so they kept the car for six days. They said that the heater was fixed, but that some pin for the door had to be ordered, and that took 6 days. I picked up the car on Tuesday, Sept16. I took the car in for the second time on Friday, September 19, because it was leaking some kind of fluid. When I called on Sept. 18 and mentioned the problem, I was told that it was due to condensation from running the air conditioner.

    I disagreed and called to talk to someone else in the service department, Pat, who said to bring it in to have it checked. The coolant indicator kept lighting up on the dashboard as I was driving the car down for the appointment. After checking out the car, they said that the windhshield wiper fluid container was cracked and the radiator cap needed to be replaced. They replaced these things, and I drove home. The coolant light came on again, and I called the service center. They wanted me to bring it back on Monday. I told Lonnie that this was ridiculous, and I took it to a mechanic in town.

    He told me that it had a blown head gasket and that's why the coolant indicator kept coming on. He also told me that the car had been hit from behind and on the driver's side, something that was not mentioned to me. The AutoCheck printout that I was given did not mention anything about accidents. In fact, the information in the report was quite vague. I took it back that same day and asked Ken Miller how could they miss a blown head gasket? I was told it was due to human error. I was also told that if I didn't want the car, they would sell it to someone else. From Sept. 22 to the present, I am still waiting for my car.

    I was told by David ***** that my car would be taken to a BMW dealership, because the Carmax Service Center did not have the right tools. Then I was told that they have a certified BMW mechanic after all, on their night shift, and that he would be the one to fix it right there at the Carmax Service Center.

    Thanks for your vote!

    Reviewed Sept. 30, 2008

    I purchased a 2001 BMW 325i on September 10, 2008. Out of the 19 days that I have owned the car, it has been in the Carmax Service Center for 17 days. On the day that I purchased the vehicle, September 10, there was a problem with the heater, so they kept the car for six days. They said that the heater was fixed, but that some pin for the door had to be ordered, and that took 6 days. I picked up the car on Tuesday, Sept16. I took the car in for the second time on Friday, September 19, because it was leaking some kind of fluid. When I called on Sept. 18 and mentioned the problem, I was told that it was due to condensation from running the air conditioner.

    I disagreed and called to talk to someone else in the service department,Pat, who said to bring it in to have it checked. The coolant indicator kept lighting up on the dashboard as I was driving the car down for the appointment. After checking out the car, they said that the windhshield wiper fluid container was cracked and the radiator cap needed to be replaced. They replaced these things, and I drove home. The coolant light came on again, and I called the service center. They wanted me to bring it back on Monday. I told Lonnie that this was ridiculous, and I took it to a mechanic in town. He told me that it had a blown head gasket and that's why the coolant indicator kept coming on. He also told me that the car had been hit from behind and on the driver's side, something that was not mentioned to me.

    The AutoCheck printout that I was given did not mention anything about accidents. In fact, the information in the report was quite vague. I took it back that same day and asked Ken Miller how could they miss a blown head gasket? I was told it was due to human error. I was also told that if I didn't want the car, they would sell it to someone else.

    From Sept. 22 to the present, I am still waiting for my car. I was told by David that my car would be taken to a BMW dealership, because the Carmax Service Center did not have the right tools. Then I was told that they have a certified BMW mechanic after all, on their night shift, and that he would be the one to fix it right there at the Carmax Service Center.

    The car is not worth the $11,998 sticker price, taking into consideration that the car was in at least two accidents which were never revealed to me by Carmax or AutoCheck. I am recently divorced and this is the first car I have purchased by myself. If it wasn't for the mechanic that I chose to take a look at my car, I would have unknowingly drove off the lot with a blown head gasket along with other defects that should have been repaired by Carmax without me having to do their job for them.

    Thanks for your vote!

    Reviewed Sept. 11, 2008

    My friend and I both bought cars at Carmax within a few weeks of each other. I got a 2006 Saab, he got a 2005 Mazda 3. Both cars were missing the owner's manual and any other original documentation. We both bought extended warranties from Carmax costing almost $2000.00 each. My friends Mazda died because the Belt Tensioner failed which caused a chain reaction of all belts being snapped and therefore the car not drivable. This happened at 3am so garage and towing options were limited.

    After calling the extended warrantee number we found they were closed for the weekend and had no direction on what to do. We had the car towed to a garage and asked them to start the work on the car over the weekend. After finally reaching the warrantee people we were told that nothing would be covered under the warrantee because the Mazda was still under factory warrantee! We called Mazda and it did in fact stil have a factory warrantee in place. However, in order for Mazda to cover the problem Mazda Roadside assist had to do the towing and take it to the dealership. Arrangements were then made to tow the car from the current garage to the dealer by Mazda. When all was ready to go the garage said that they were done with the repairs already, therefore, nothing was left for Mazda to do.

    Now Mazda will not reimburse my friend for the $800.00 repair and towing and neither will the extended warrantee people. He had two full warrantees for the vehicle and both were useless at the time because f the misinformation given by Carmax at the time of the sale.

    After some checking I found that my Saab also had a factory warrantee good for about 2 more years! We called the local Carmax Sales Manager and asked why were both sold warrantees when they surely were aware that these cars had factory warrantees. I got some crazy explanation that seemed like a canned script. After my rebutle the response was that is interesting. He explained that the warrantee can be cancelled before 90 days for a fee.

    I have to assume the following from both my experience and my friend's. 1) Carmax purposely removes the owner's manual from their cars so that any current warrantee info is not noticed. 2) Carmax sells extended warrantees to customers fully knowing that many cars on their lot still have factory warrantees. Be aware! if you buy from Carmax take the time to call a local dealer for that model and understand if there is an existing warrantee.

    A total of $800.00 was spent and is non refundable because of Carmax's business practices of not explaining warrantee information properly and not providing owners manuals.

    Thanks for your vote!

    Reviewed Aug. 18, 2008

    May 22, 2008: Went to CarMax and purchased 2004 Chevy TrailBlazer from showroom. Traded in 2006 Chrysler 300 for $12,000 toward purchase price. TrailBlazer has a flat tire within a week of purchase. We fill the tire 3 times and call CarMax to make an appointment to get it fixed. There is no answer, so I leave a message. After 4 days the call is not returned, so I have to call back and request an appointment again. June 6, 2008: Speedometer on TrailBlazer malfunctions and is completely upside-down, but still moving. When getting my son out of the back seat, I notice that the rubber lining on the passenger side back door is falling completely off. A woman from the business office calls and asks if I sent in the insurance information to get my registration and tags. I told her it had been sent, and she responded that it was probably in the pile. I asked if perhaps they should check the pile before calling customers about it, and she hung up on me. Took car to Service Department to have the tire, speedometer, and door liner repaired. Spoke to manager about all of the issues, who offered an apology and justification for their errors. Given a loaner car after waiting almost 2 hours. Was called and told that the speedometer was a wiring issue and they needed or order a new instrument panel, and it would be several days. Picked the car up, got it home, and noticed that the tire was still flat. At this point, I noticed that there was an unusual amount of rust on the underside of the TrailBlazer on the frame, wheel wells, and even inside the car on the pedals. I called back and told them that they did not address everything they were supposed to, and that I also wanted them to look at the rust. June 23, 2008: Took the TrailBlazer back to the service department. After waiting for 2 hours was told that they patched the tire, but hadn't looked at the rust yet. After waiting longer, the service advisor came out and told me that there was a very large amount of rust under the vehicle, and that the driveshaft was rusted out and it needed extensive repair. Received a phone call after exchanging several on the 23rd and we went in and met with a manager to complain and talk about where we needed to go. Were given three options: let them repair the TrailBlazer and us keep it; let them buy the TrailBlazer from us for its diminished Kelley Blue Book Value, or swap the TrailBlazer for another CarMax car of similar price. We decided to get another CarMax car to avoid losing several thousand dollars. Picked out a 2004 Cadillac SRX for $13,998, plus the 48-month warranty. Signed all of the papers freeing us from the TrailBlazer and tying us to the SRX. Approximately 3 weeks after purchasing the SRX, the passenger front turn signal stops working. Additionally, the plastic casing for the airbag on the back passenger side is falling off, and the brakes squeal when coming to a stop. I call and request a service appointment, and take the car in to have it diagnosed. I am told that I will receive a phone call the following day and that the part would be in the day after. I never received a return phone call, and had to call several times the following week to even find out if the part was in. After getting into contact with the service department, we schedule an appointment that I am unable to make because my husband is called into work unexpectedly. We schedule another appointment for August 20 at 10am, and then reschedule for an earlier time (8am). On 8/15/08 at 7:40am, I bring the SRX to the CarMax service center and sign the papers to have it repaired. Was told 1.5-2 hour wait. After sitting in the waiting room for approximately 15 minutes, my service advisor Tim comes and tells me there is a problem. I am informed that the service technician crashed my car into a steel pole in the garage as he was pulling it in. I am taken to the garage to observe the damage. I am given a loaner that I am to return with a full tank of gas and return home. I contact a lawyer (Mark Beam) and am told that it is reasonable to ask for a full refund of the purchase price (which, after removing financing and the warranty, is $12,000), as well as for them to allow me to use their loaner vehicle to travel to Memphis as planned and return it to the Memphis CarMax, or for them to cover the rental of a similar vehicle. I call CarMax and request to speak to the General Manager, but am redirected to the Service Manager's extension. I call at approximately 11am, but there is no answer. I call the service department and there is also no answer, so my husband, toddler, and I drive to CarMax to speak with someone directly. Tim, the service advisor, claims that there are no managers in the entire building for me to talk to. He takes me back to the car so that I can take pictures of the damage. While we are in the garage, he brings me a service supervisor to talk to, to whom I explained the situation. He and Tim told me that they would have a manager contact me on Monday. While I am in the garage with Tim, my husband observes a different sales advisor (Dameon) driving a customer's car in reverse at high speeds through the parking lot with no regard for safety, other cars, or pedestrians. Our request involves 3 options for CarMax to choose from which we think are certainly fair. We are not looking to profit from this situation, and are not looking to go to court. Option 1: Refund the full purchase price and first month's payment, cancel the warranty and lien. This equates to $12,131.03 (the value of our initial trade-in and the first month's car payment). Additionally, we request that CarMax provide a loaner vehicle for us to drive to Memphis and drop off at the Memphis CarMax that is of comparable size and fuel economy to the Cadillac SRX. Option 2: Refund the full purchase price and first month's payment, cancel the warranty and lien. This equates to $12,131.03 (the value of our initial trade-in and the first month's car payment). Additionally, we request that CarMax cover the cost of a rental car through the agency of our choice of a vehicle for us to drive to Memphis that is of comparable size and fuel economy to the Cadillac SRX. If CarMax chooses this option, a quote will be provided in a timely manner. Option 3: Repair the Cadillac and make an arrangement for CarMax in Memphis to refund the full purchase price and first month's payment, cancel the warranty and lien. This equates to $12,131.03 (the value of our initial trade-in and the first month's car payment).

    Thanks for your vote!

    Reviewed Aug. 8, 2008


    THIS IS THE LETTER I WROTE TO CAR MAX TODAY, LETS SEE!

    Per our conversation today August 8, 2008, you advised me that CarMax could not work on the 2003 Mercedes under my extended warranty #7136234880 , because you Lonnie advised me Mercedes has special tools and car max does not have them to work on the car? I wish I was told that the first time I drove two hours to get the car there, and then again for the second repair. Why do you sell extended warranties on a car you dont have the tools to repair?

    The 2003 Mercedes has been at Car Max in Roseville twice with the same problem, one in June 2008 and then again last week? I picked up the Mercedes on Monday August 4, 2008 for the second repair in Roseville for the same problem in June. I got halfway home after picking up the supposedly repaired car, and the car stalled and the check engine light came on again, same problem and I was almost hit in the rear by another car! Today I was told to take the car to Mercedes and a full refund would be issued by check today to Candice Rogers for the last two visits to the Roseville car Max and Car Max would pay for the repair at Mercedes under the extended policy.

    Now I have a car I cant drive and will now have to rent a car because Car Max sold me a car and an extended warranty for a car CarMax does not have the tools to work on? Does not make sense. I will be taking the car to Mercedes in Reno, and I cant get in till Monday August 11, thats there soonest appointment, and will send the bill for the repairs and car rental bill to CarMax for reimbursement in full.

    Im a very unsatisfied customer and wont recommend Car Max for anyone who buys a Mercedes.

    Thanks for your vote!

    Reviewed July 30, 2008

    I feel that the payment is too much for me. The payment is 325.00. It is been over two years already. My vehicle is Nissan Xterra 2002. It is pretty old. It is too high for me. I only can make 200 payment.

    Thanks for your vote!

    Reviewed July 8, 2008

    I had a 2003 Hyundai Tiburon GT transferred to Carmax in Midlothian VA, from Greensboro, NC. The car came in on a Saturday, I was told it would be ready for me to come in and purchase, and that while I was going through the paper work, the necessary conditioning would be done. I finished the paper work, and was promptly informed by my consultant that he couldn't release the car to me because it was not tagged for sale yet. The conditioning had not been done, and the person in charge of that responsibility was not in that day, and wouldn't be until the following week.

    After 2 hours, Carmax got someone in to flag the car for sale (which I appreciated immensely). I then went out to see my car, and found that the whole front driverside quarter panel was covered in white paint flecks, and there was evidence of a deep gouge down on of the doors that had been painted over. Badly. I was upset that I was paying $14,000 sticker for a car that had obviously been painted (badly, twice), and then I went and tried to use my remote keyless entry to take it for a test drive. Surprise! It didn't work.

    The head of Carmax service and my consultant were great in getting me an appointment to have the car reconditioned and the wiring fixed. I took delivery of the car since I didn't have one and needed to work. Three days later, my airbag light came on. I called in, and Carmax said they would take care of everything.

    Unfortunately (or maybe fortunately in this case), at the light in front of the dealership on my way to take my car in, a pickup truck ran the light and t-boned me, totalling the car 8 days after purchase. When buying another car, I looked up that particular car's VIN, and found that it had been reported in a major, front end collision. Carmax NEVER should have even thought of selling the car. One of my airbags didn't deploy de to the faulty wiring on the drivers side (the side my key fob didn' work on).

    When an insurance adjuster came to look at and appraise my totalled car, he found the evidence of the previous accident, and the insurance company initially refused to pay what I had paid because of the damage Carmax Greensboro had failed to take into consideration. Carmax Midlothian however was relatively easy to work with, and my consultant was great and really helped me get things done on a difficult day.

    Thanks for your vote!

    Reviewed June 10, 2008

    I recieved a Brake Linning Fault. Left Blinker Fault. One morning I went out for work and the car would not start. Somthing started draining the battery very quickly all of a sudden. And to this day they have not been able to fix the draining problem.

    This has been very costly. I'm scared to drive it anywhere for fear it won't start!

    Thanks for your vote!

    Reviewed May 13, 2008


    I purchased a car from Carmax a 2001 volvo xc90 wagon. When i bought the car they went over several times about there 125 point inspection process. The first two weeks we had the car it was shifting really funny and the blower kept going off in the car when it was not running. Well the blowere was fine but the transmission had to be replaced they had my car for over a month. They then gave the car back but there was an extreamly loud noises coming from the engine compartment andthe car was vibrating like crazy. We took it back in again and now the motor mounts are broken so they had to replace those.

    Then finally we think were in the clear and weregetting the oil chaged at a quik stop cheveron aand there lead mechanic lets us nkow that the car is leaking oil and trnsmission fluid my first response is it is a brand new tranmission in the car and there are no spots in my car he tells me my skid plate is full of tranmission fluid and oil and the c.v boots are shoot also the tranmission was porely put.

    I have called carmax coporate office with no returned call and the genral manager of the store in tucson said we could bring back but he would only be able to take as at trade in value (remember this is only 2months after purchasing the vehicle. Somthing is very wrong with this company and we need some help please.

    I think them telling me that this car has been through this 125 point inspection and having all these problems is a scam and is aganist the law and then them trying to make more money of me by trying me they will buy the car back at half the price is bull. Please help.

    Thanks for your vote!

    Reviewed May 12, 2008


    I took my car in for repair for radiator, they indicated my transmission oil cooler was bad and they forgot to put any transmission fluid back in, now it's leaking.

    Thanks for your vote!

    Reviewed April 21, 2008

    IN REGARDS TO BEING LATE IN MAKING ONES PAYMENTS TO THIS COMPANY. This company has been harassing my co-signer and myself with phone calls(up to 3)each day while we are late in our payments. They have not been a bother other than this and they gave us good service when we bought the car. I understand their position in wanting the payments caught up or the car reclaimed. This tactic does they use however is not helping their aim. They are not offering to connect with me. There is no intent to develop more of a relation with me that would help them get their money.

    No damage, it is just harassment, rather than relating with a fellow human. A sad state of business affairs. Anyone else dealing with CarMax who is slipping behind in their payments just know that this is how they are. Yes it is an improvement over them sending someone out to break my arm so I can work better at getting their money

    Thanks for your vote!

    Reviewed March 20, 2008


    I was driving up a on ramp to get on the highway. As I was speeding up I heard a loud Clunking noise. I pulled over and the noise was my engine. I took it to the dealership I bought it from and they said I need a new engine. Luckly I have a warranty. I am in the process of going back and forth with them to replace my engine. We will see...

    Thanks for your vote!

    Reviewed Jan. 5, 2008

    I would like to express my complete dissatisfaction with the service Ive encountered at three of the Southern California locations.

    Ive been trying to purchase a preferably black, 2002-04 Z06 Corvette. I thought Id try Carmax, thinking as your slogan states The way car buying should be?. This hasnt been my experience. Here is a brief summary;

    1. The Irvine location has three times told me or expressed that they had a particular vehicle in stock but they did not. One response was we sold that several days ago another was It's out on demo and won't be back for a while?.

    2. The LAX location could never answer a simple question about a vehicles exhaust, tires etc.. Oh, others have asked me about that. I can see that I was not alone in being ignored.

    3. The latest, at the Duarte location. A 2004 Z06 shows up after midnight and is priced at approximately $31,988. I email the location about purchasing. Not more than an hour later, I go back to the site to show a coworker the vehicle, the pictures are removed and the price has been increased by over $1,500 dollars! This is how car buying should be? A customer shows interest in a car and the price is jacked up!

    Is there a computer program that raises the price of a vehicle when there is interest in it?

    It appears the hoopla some have heard concerning Carmax is just Carmaxs self promotion...nothing more.
    I can only say that if any of my relatives, friends or coworkers mention Carmax when looking for a car,

    I will relate to them my experiences and do my best to dissuade them from ever setting foot in a Carmax lot.

    Thanks for your vote!

    Reviewed Nov. 28, 2007


    The repair service department has a sign affixed to the recommended service schedule in the customer waiting area that states We'll fix it right and fast or it's free.

    I took my Plymouth minivan, which was purchased from CarMax, for brake repair on August 27, 2007. I was informed that I would only need to wait for 1.5 hours. Instead, I was there for approx. 3.5 hours. The store location is far from my home, resulting in 4.5 hours of missed income in travel time plus repair time.

    After driving the vehicle for 2-3 days, the original break problem returned with an additional screeching sound on the side where additionally recommended brake work had been performed. I took the vehicle back to CarMax, spending additional time waiting for the originally requested repair.

    At the time of this second scheduled visit on September 17, 2007, I talked with Ken Saxton, Repaid Service Manager. Although reluctant to honor the company's commitment, he eventually agreed to reimburse me the cost of the 2nd visit to CarMax (Approx. $300). He stated that the check would be mailed from the Corporate Office and that he had my address, etc. After 2 months and non receipt of the reimbursement check, I faxed Mr. Saxton a letter detailing my experience and confirming his commitment which I phrased as reimbursement for unsatisfactory services delivered on August 27, 2007.

    I did not receive a return call or other acknowledgement of my fax, resulting in a follow-up call the following afternoon immediately prior to the service department's closing. Finally, I reached him on November 14, at which time he requested that I give the company an additional week. If I did not receive a check at that time, he stated that he would give me a cash out at the Memphis location. After an additional week and no response, I contacted him for the cash out, at which time he asked that I allow the company to collect enough cash in its drawer that day to reimbursement me and contact him the day after Thanksgiving. He committed to leaving a note with the business office. I called the morning of November 23, day after Thanksgiving, and the business office did not have record of his commitment. They contacted him and he indicated that I would need to wait until after 3:00 p.m. that day. When I arrived at the store, there was considerable confusion. The company finally located an authorization from Mr. Saxton for $165, approximately 1/2 the cost of the visit.

    Neither the Operations Manager or Store Manager, John Robinson has returned my call to discuss this matter.

    Thanks for your vote!

    Reviewed March 8, 2007


    I purchased a 2005 new Nissan Altima (3.5) in April 2005. Upon Driving it I am beginning to experience a sulfur smell coming from the vehicle.

    I notified the Carmax Nissan Service Department (Keith). He asked was I burning regular gas. I told him yes. He told me to partially empty the gas tank and than fill up with premiun gas at least twice. He also told me if I brought the car in and they flushed the tank. They would charge me because it was not covered under the warranty. He than went on to say that he has gotten over at least 10 call a day about this problem.

    I read my onwers manual on recommended/required fuel and noticed that there is no reference to using premiun fuel. If many people are having this problem why is it that Nissan has not informed us of this. Your intervention in this matter will be appreciated.

    Thanks for your vote!

    Reviewed Feb. 27, 2007

    I bought a 2001 Toyota Celica last June. Since that time they have replaced the brakes (the day after I bought it) When I asked about all the checks they were supposed to do I was informed it was transferred from another Carmax and some of them had service department issues. They have also replaced the engine, catalytic converter, ignition switch, charcoal cannister, power steering pump, tensioner pulley and fixed a bad ground wire in the instrument panel. the check engine light is still on and now they say to bring it back in. The sales manager I spoke with was rude, informed me that I could tell people not to go to Carmax and hoped I could sleep at night and to think about the situation intelligently.
    Thanks for your vote!

    Reviewed Sept. 21, 2006


    I purchased my 2001 Nissan Altima August of 2006 at Carmax of Jacksonville Fla. I was informed that this car was very reliable and was well taken care of. Carmax informed me that the car was inspected 100% before anyone buys it, but WRONG!! I live in Georgia and after driving it for less than 30 days, I am already having problems. The check engine light has came on for the 3rd time. My brakes are a big problem and they keep replacing them. I just found out today that I need my cataystic converter replaced and my car needed a tune-up. I am so upset because I was informed before I purchased this car that it was completely OK. This will be my first and last time purchasing a used Nissan!!!

    Thanks for your vote!

    Reviewed Aug. 26, 2006


    A used 2005 Chrysler Sebring convertible I bought at Carmax on August 10, 2006 with trade in and paid with cash (Check) was not taken possession by me day of purchase or anytime after that date due to problems discovered before driving off Carmax lot. A loaner car was given to me until August 24, 2006 to no satisfaction provided to me. My trade in was transported to Georgia for resale. I demanded out of my contract, reimbursed my money and to give me back my trade in.

    My trade in was returned back to me on August 24, 2006. Carmax offered to sell me another car and if it was more money they would take $500.00 off sale price. Due to my distrust I declined. In my research I found the car I bought from Carmax was previously an Alamo rental car which is opposite of what I was told by salesman upon buying the vehicle. I was told it was previously leased by private owner and was not a rental car therefore this would void out the powertrain warranty, this was confirmed to me by Daimler Chrysler.


    My orginal trade in that was not given back to me in the same shape as it was when Carmax took it over August 10, 2006. Carmax claims it is exactly how it was when I left it with them August 10, 2006. Carmax told me they would fix the my car for $500.00. In all fairness my trade in should have never left Carmax lot until I took possession of the Car I bought. My refund from Carmax ($10,854.19) for the auto purchased by me will take two weeks to be mailed to me.

    On August 24, 2006 I sent a Federal Express letter to CEO of Carmax Tom Folliard 12800 Tuckahoe Creek Pkwy Richmond VA 23238. On the evening of August 23, 2006 I left a message at the office of Tom Folliard Carmax CEO at coperate office (80-519-1511). Unfortunately it is impossible to actually talk to this CEO. On August 24, 2006 my call was returned to me by John Collins a representative at Carmax Coperate office. I am sure my complaint was filted out by Mr. Collins and all Carmax employees which prevents my claim from going to the top. I feel no consideration was given to me from day one. I have no way to prove my claim about the condition of my trade in unless the Carmax Certified Appraiser Elliot Cox can prove me right. Mr. Cox is on vacation so I have no way of contacting him at this time. My biggest complaint is the inconsideration to me by all employees at Carmax.

    Thanks for your vote!

    Reviewed Aug. 19, 2006


    I purchased a 2000 4- cylinder Dodge Caravan from Car-Max on W. Sahara Blvd. approx. 8 months ago.

    The price of Van was 10.995.00 ($11,000.00) and 6 months, 8,000 miles later to my surprise when I finally realized I was having far to many problems for an auto they said was in great shape (and should be for that kind of money), to my surprise I had an appraisal of only $4,000.00?? I just couldnt believe how it was possible for the same company to appraise this Van for practically $7,000.00 worth of depreciation?

    I asked the Management for answers all of which were just beating around the bush with no solid or logical reasons and I also emailed the consumer affair personnel at there headquarters and still got no satisfaction (although many that I talked to found it hard to believe it themselves).

    I need some answers? With an answer that make sense? And if they cannot then make me a reasonable offer on another vehicle, I even said I knew I would take a beating if they were to do so, but Thus far anything would be better than the piece of junk they sold me.

    My wife is going threw chemo, I am permanently disabled and we have an adopted granddaughter that just turned (8) and we dont need the problems we are having, we need a reliable car and again I say because of the price and the great things we have heard about Car-Max and there wonderful ads on television? we depended on a good honest deal. But the day we went to Car-Max to make this purchase our previous auto broke down 110 day and we had to take a bus the remaining 15 or so miles to Car-Max, Was it because we had desperate written all over us? that they stuck us with a lemon? I rather not believe that.. But we were indeed desperate we needed a car that day, and we needed a reliable one! and we had to trust them especially in the position we were now in. I cannot believe they are not willing to help in any way.

    Thanks for your vote!

    Reviewed Dec. 15, 2005

    With in 5 days of purchasing the vehicle from Carmax with an extended warranty the vehicle overheated. Carmax took it back, replaced the Thermostat and gave it back to me.
    The car was still having heating problems. I took it back to Carmax. They gave me a quote of over 800.00 dollars, all of which would not be covered under an extended warranty that I purchased upon buying the car. All of the items on the quote were not an issue with the car, which I found out upon taking it to a private, certified mechanic.

    Upon taking my car to three separate mechanics, two of which did not want to work with the Carmax warranty because of the troubles they have had in the past, the third mechanic was willing to work on it.

    Originally, Carmax wanted to replace my radiator, thermostat (for the 3rd time) and various other parts. Finally, I have a diagnosis from a private certified mechanic and it is the first Cylinder Head that is cracked.

    Thanks for your vote!

    Reviewed April 20, 2005


    I bought my car in April 2004. After 2 days of having the car, the clutch went out. I called and they said to bring the car in to have it repaired by their 30 day warranty. I explained on the paperwork that I thought the clutch master cylinder neede replacing. Once I picked up my vehicle they told me that they had to order the part and I should bring it back. I left the business, and began reading the ticket for my repairs, and they were ordering a brake master cylinder!! I called and was told that they just didnt read the order very well, and they thought I said I needed a brake master cylinder(which would have absolutely NO impact on how the clutch works!). Again, they said to bring it in .

    After having my car for 3 days, they said that they could not find anything wrong with it! The clutch goes completely out about every 100-150 miles to where you have to turn off the car and wait about 30 minutes, and then it will work. Now, the car has been stalling very badly, so I took it to the Nissan dealer to see what was wrong with it. Well, now I need a $1000.00 part (the throttle body) so it will stop stalling. I am told that it will just get worse over time, and finally stop going at all! I have been sold a piece of crap for $20,000.00 and the dealer could care less, because they already got their money!

    This car is not old enough to have all of these problems, and I still have 4 1/2 years to pay for a car that only sometimes drives me to where I need to go!!!!!! I will NEVER buy a Nissan again, they are horrible cars!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


    I am unable to go on trips, for fear of breaking down, I miss work andactivities with my children when I cannot get the car to go. The throttle body makes the car have HORRIBLE gas mileage, and at $2.47 per gallon, who can afford to keep blowing money on gas?????????????

    Thanks for your vote!

    Reviewed Sept. 3, 2004


    I purchased a car in November 2003, as a student with a 700 plus credit score no cosigner. I recently had the starter replaced three times on my 1996 GMC Jimmy. The mechanic who replaced the started stated that I would damage my transmission. His findings was this was not the original engine and the one that's in the socket is cracked that holds the bolt from the starter. I have spoken with sales manager mentioned aboved regarding this matter.

    To replace the engine would cost $3000.00 at least. Carmax won't trade the car out, even with a cosigner, stating the negative equity and me being a student. This is really getting to be a headache for me. There is not enough time in the day to deal with this. The loan is to new to have to experience such a mechanical financial burden. What am I to do, close to turning the car back as a voluntarily repo. Help Stanley

    Thanks for your vote!

    Reviewed June 24, 2004


    I bought a car (2000 Ford Windstar) through Carmax in Naperville in October of 2002. I purchased the car when I was 8 months pregnant. Since the time I purchased the car I have had nothing but problems which includes the passenger side door falling off it's hinges. Thank God I was near my mothers house at the time and had to drive there to get my door roped shut. I had to then drive home about 15-20 miles on the highway with my door roped shut and my 9 mo. old and 3 yr. old in the backseat. It was terrifying!!

    Other problems I have had with this car is the paint on the front bumper chipping off, bad brakes, a slipping transmission, my rear brake light doesn't work because the wire keeps fraying, some sort of electrical problem where my windows decide when they want to work and the lights in my car either don't work at all or flash on and off. I have had some work done on the car already but the problems I discuss above are new. This car is a lemon!!! I was never notified by the dealer that this vehicle had been a fleet vehicle that they purchased from an auction. I didn't find out until I tried to trade in the vehicle. The manager at the dealership where I went to trade in my car did a vehicle inspection and told me something wasn't right and then chose to run a Carfax report.

    The result of his inspection was that I needed new tie-rods, my transmission was slipping between 1st & 2nd gear, my brakes were bad, the tires didn't match, the steering wheel was shaking and the front bumper was peeling. He felt that the mileage didn't coincide with the extent of repair work that was needed. He also told me that he has collegues that work at Carmax and he has been told stories about how they whack people. He was not saying this about Carmax so he could sell me a car, he likes to establish good rapport with his customers and felt like he would be putting me in a worse situation than I was already in if he sold me a vehicle from his lot. And what I needed to do was to contact Carmax and try to resolve the problem with them directly since the car is in such poor condition and they sold me such a horrible car with 2 small children.

    Carfax says that the car has only had 2 owners one which is myself. But there have been 8 vehicle registrations. The car was also only driven 425 miles the 1st 8 months it was purchased and then the next 8 months 15,000 miles.

    Thanks for your vote!

    Reviewed Jan. 1, 2004

    Purchased used 2000 Dodge Durango with 32K miles in June of 2003. In November 2003, the vehicle with 41K miles experienced problems including the steering wheel locking while driving, brake failure, electrical failure. Dealership agreed problems we serious, and did not have a fix. They offered to buy the car back at a cost of $14K. The vehicle was purchased 6 months ago at a total cost of $23K, plus a trade in of a 2004 Toyota RAV4 excellent condition whose pay off amount is added onto the $23K loan amount.


    The dealership has offered to buy back an unusable vehicle at a $9k loss to me from the original purchase price 6 months ago because we put 9K miles on the car. We have no vehicle, nor can we purchased a used or new vehicle of comparable size with the money offered and financial loss requested by the dealership. Complaint filed with the BBB.

    Thanks for your vote!
    Loading more reviews...

    CarMax Company Information

    Company Name:
    CarMax
    Website:
    www.carmax.com