
Carfax Reviews
- We require contact information to ensure our reviewers are real.
- Our moderators read all reviews to verify quality and helpfulness.
- We use intelligent software that helps us maintain the integrity of reviews.
About Carfax
- User-friendly interface
- Helpful for informed decisions
- Poor customer service response
- Limited access to corrections
Carfax Reviews
Filter by Rating
- (28)
- (7)
- (9)
- (45)
- (596)
Popular Mentions
- 4,971,908 reviews on ConsumerAffairs are verified.
- We require contact information to ensure our reviewers are real.
- We use intelligent software that helps us maintain the integrity of reviews.
- Our moderators read all reviews to verify quality and helpfulness.
Recent
- Recent
- Oldest
- Most helpful
A link has directed you to this review. Its location on this page may change next time you visit.
- 4,971,908 reviews on ConsumerAffairs are verified.
- We require contact information to ensure our reviewers are real.
- We use intelligent software that helps us maintain the integrity of reviews.
- Our moderators read all reviews to verify quality and helpfulness.
Reviewed Aug. 5, 2011
Less than any stars!!!
I purchased a 5 look up Carfax package only to find out later in the tiny small print online that it expired in 30 days. So I only was able to run 1 instead of what I thought I had purchased 5!
Reviewed Aug. 4, 2011
Earlier this year, I was attempting to downgrade to a less expensive car. I was having issues with low offers being given by dealerships for trade-in value and couldn't figure out why. In March 2011, I had a Carfax report pulled on my vehicle by a dealer friend of mine. I was informed that the report had comments indicating my airbag had deployed when I was in an accident in Sept. 2009. The airbag was never deployed. Upon calling my insurance company and the repair facility, both agencies confirmed that they do not report to Carfax.
I filed a request with Carfax for the correction. I provided a copy of the repair report with pictures as supporting documentation. I was informed that the repair report was not an acceptable documentation. They needed the original long form police report submitted in order for the correction to be made. It turned out that the police report had the wrong box checked and listed that my airbag had deployed. So I had to get the original police officer to correct the report. The corrected report was then provided to Carfax. Carfax made the correction to the Sept 2009 comment and removed the verbiage "airbag deployed”. However, they also "added" an additional comment dated Oct 2009 listing that a repair bill was provided by the consumer and repairs were valued at $3760.79. I have asked Carfax to remove the additional comment. The repair report was provided specifically as supporting documentation to be used for the correction of an existing comment, not for an additional comment to be added. Carfax refused to remove the comment and accused me of attempting to defraud the public.
Reviewed July 30, 2011
The CARFAX report on my vehicle indicates it was in an accident in Miami. We have never been in Miami with our car, nor has it EVER been in an accident. This is going to cost us dollars in the end run and they refuse to do something about it.
Reviewed July 25, 2011
On July 25, 2011, I requested a carfax report on a car that was totaled after a rear end collision. I was just curious what city or state the car wound up. Over one year after the accident, I requested one (1) report. The email I received from carfax indicates that I'm being charged for five (5) reports. At this time I'm not in the car buying market, so I don't need any additional report.
Please correct the charge so that I don't have to contact my credit card company and start the "charge dispute paperwork" to resolve this error. Please send an email confirming receipt of this message.
Reviewed July 17, 2011
I'm original owner of my 2006 Honda Accord today I listed my can online for sale and ran a carfax cause I wanted to show buyers my carfax report and it shows odometer is rolled back and that I did inspection on my car twice with in 3 month period now I have no idea what can be done carfax is a joke and now it will cost me thousands of dollars
Reviewed July 13, 2011
I listed my 2007 Honda CRV on eBay last month and eBay allows you to link to a free Car Fax report. When I saw the report, I saw that an accident on 8/1/2010 was listed, which is correct. However, it's listed as an accident reported with another vehicle. This is misleading because it was an accident that occurred when I was backing out of a space in a parking lot at the same time as the car opposite me; and our rear bumpers collided at about 1/2 MPH. The result was a slight misalignment of the bumper and a deep scratch. The repair shop could have repaired and repainted it but suggested that I replace the entire bumper cover so that the job can look seem-less, at a price of $632. This was the only accident that I had with this car and the vehicle is maintained well.
I complained to Car Fax, and faxed them the police report which indicates that the accident occurred in a parking lot. To my amazement, Car Fax refused to indicate in the report that the accident occurred in a parking lot. Through e-mails back and forth, Mr. **, the Car Fax resolution manager, has taken a firm and confrontational stance; and when I asked for a decision-maker, he indicated that he was the decision-maker, and that no further communications on this matter will happen. He refuses to give me a phone number as there are no numbers for Car Fax listed anywhere.
To make matters worse, after this inquiry, Car Fax added another accident occurring 1/5/2011 to my report involving a front-left impact. This is totally erroneous because I did not have any accident with this vehicle other than the one on 8/2/2010. I faxed Car Fax my complaint. Mike ** replied through e-mail that he is looking into the matter. This is totally ridiculous. They should take it off the report immediately because it is affecting my ability to sell my car. I wonder which government entity regulates Car Fax? This is the worst-run company I have ever seen. Their unjustified actions will cost me over $4,500 in value on my vehicle. They need to be stopped. They are breaking the law. How can a company knowingly post inaccurate and misleading information? There should be a class action law suit.
Reviewed July 5, 2011
Carfax is a scam. Tried to trade my car in the other day and the dealership ran a "carfax" and it said that my car had been in an accident. Which is inaccurate as I am the only one to ever drive it. They reduced the value of my trade by $1,200. Really makes you wonder how many of their other reports are inaccurate...
Reviewed July 1, 2011
Purchased a Carfax report on 6/12/08, confirmation no. UCP20080612133348. It said report for the 2006 Chev Corvette was clean, no accident reports. So I proceeded to buy the Corvette.
I decided to sell the Corvette on 6/30/11 to Maroone Autonations. They initially offered 32.4K for the Corvette. They later withdrew the offer because the Carfax they acquired showed my car was in an accident on 10/6/07.
Either the Carfax report of 6/30/11 provided to Maroone is incorrect or my report purchased on 6/12/08. If my Carfax report was incorrect, then I would not have bought the car. Consequently, if I cannot sell my car to Maroone for 32.4K, then Carfax needs to make whatever arrangements it needs to make with whomever, so I can sell my car at 32.4K.
If not, I will contact an attorney to pursue the matter. If I don't hear from someone from Carfax by Tuesday, July 5th, I will take legal action.
If they or any other dealers will not buy my Corvette because of a supposed accident, then I am out 32.4K.
Reviewed May 8, 2011
I purchased my Audi A4 from a Volkswagen dealership in May of 2010. Before purchasing this car, I checked Carfax's report which came back totally clean; no accidents and no issues at all. Yesterday (May 2011), I decided to trade in this car and was shocked with the price they offered. The price was extremely low because they said that this vehicle has been in an accident. At first, I thought that there was some kind of mistake, but when I looked at the Carfax report, it showed an accident that happened in April of 2008 and reported to Carfax in July of 2010, which was 2 years and 3 months after the accident and 2 months after I purchased the car.
I am very disappointed. I have been told that I can't do anything about it and I guess I'll just have to pay for someone's accident. I will never trust Carfax again and I advise everyone else not to. It cost me thousands of dollars, and I'm probably not the only one.
Reviewed May 4, 2011
They misrepresented the amount of miles on my car, stating that the odometer may have been tampered with. I was offered much less for my trade than what it is worth based on the erroneous information in Carfax.
Reviewed April 18, 2011
I went to the Infiniti dealership and they had run my Carfax history and they had said there might have been a typo by mistake on your end with inconsistent reading with the mileage on March 16, 2010. The mileage is 32,152, and on March 22, the mileage is 52,341, and on March 26, the mileage is 31,452. Something just doesn't sound right with this. Please give me a call back. I am very concerned about this. Thanks!
Reviewed April 7, 2011
I was involved in two car accidents in July and August 2007. The Carfax report is stating my air bags deployed when they didn't and the car's value has been lowered by $1,500.00. Both the auto body shop and the field representative can and will support this information and I want this cleared off my Carfax report. I have a 2004 Chrysler PT Cruiser. The auto body shop is ARA Collision and their telephone number is: 206-635-2053 and their fax number is 206-635-1701. They can verify that the airbags were reset, but never deployed. So please have someone contact me ASAP as I want to sell the car.
Reviewed March 23, 2011
Who in the world elected CarFax to be the final word on vehicles that are being traded in at a new car dealer. I lost upwards to $1,200.00 on a trade because of a CarFax on my very well taken care of, pristine 10 year old Nissan Pathfinder. The CarFax is so incorrect of proper information and of course a clerical error regarding mileage. Really embarrassed me and my wife at the dealer.
CarFax is a worthless piece of crap that cannot be changed to the correct information because this Carfax is the word of God. Example: It states that my Pathfinder was purchased at a dealer that was not in existence until four years later. It also goes on to state that my vehicle, that has always been Nissan dealer serviced, was serviced at a Non-Nissan dealer many times and the incorrect mileage cost me $1,200.00 less in my trade.
I would like this report fixed to reflect the correct information. I want a supervisor from CarFax to call me ASAP to discuss. I do not care if they do not have a call center. How can I get them to respond? This was entirely embarrassing to me as I have never had an issue with my vehicles ever.
Reviewed March 15, 2011
I attempted to trade in my '05 Civic Hybrid at my local Honda dealership. When they ran the CARFAX report, it showed "Structural Frame Damage" and they offered me less than 50% of the value of my car. This report is in regards to a minor accident in heavy traffic. My car was barely moving, a deer jumped several lanes of traffic and ran directly into my front fender. There was a small dent, the deer ran away, no other vehicles were involved, and no police report was filed.
I informed my insurance company and the damage was repaired. Both my insurance company and the body shop insisted that they did not report this accident to CarFax, let alone describe it as having caused structural frame damage. I can't figure out where else CARFAX could have gotten the information and they refused to disclose the source. Instead they wanted me to sign a release granting them access to all information pertaining to my vehicle, which I refused to do since I felt that my privacy rights have already been violated.
Reviewed March 6, 2011
I co-own a vehicle with my son. I am the original owner of this vehicle and purchased it brand new from the car dealership with eight miles on the odometer. Recently when my son was trying to trade-in this vehicle, the car dealership ran a Carfax report. The report stated that the vehicle had been declared totaled in Missouri in 2008 and was worth -$2000.
It also stated that the title was on its third owner. We thought it was a joke until the dealership showed us the report. We insisted that the dealership contact them again since we are the true original owners. The car is perfectly fine and we have never had it registered anywhere but Florida. We were told that Carfax said "for them not to take the vehicle as a trade-in, that we were lying". This was extremely embarrassing and totally humiliating. We have contacted the Missouri Dept. of Vehicles and we were told that they had notified Carfax in 2009 of the mistake concerning the VIN # on the totaled vehicle and were surprised that it hadn't been taken care of. We have emailed Carfax (since you can't talk to anyone) and haven't had a response.
We are now in our third week of dealing with this. I was advised to contact law enforcement and after talking to them, I was advised to contact the insurance company that held the coverage when the vehicle was purchased. Everyone involved other than Carfax is trying to resolve this issue.
Reviewed Feb. 23, 2011
My 2009 RX 350 Lexus has an inaccuracy report as an accident. I was parked and someone parked too close and hit the passenger's side of my car. It was only a scratch. It cost $180.00 for repair. I have all of the receipts and the name of the body shop for proof. It is impossible to contact CARFAX to have this inaccuracy removed. Because of the inaccuracy report, I am having difficulty selling my car.
Reviewed Feb. 16, 2011
I have a car that nobody will buy, even though it's in great shape and it's priced well below book value. They misrepresented my vehicle's history and condition, and will not accept calls from me, nor do anything to correct it.
Reviewed Jan. 26, 2011
I had an accident in March of 2009. The first Carfax just listed the vehicle as being in an accident. I got t-boned in the driver’s side. I did have damage done to the truck, but I had no frame damage. I recently tried to do a dealer trade, and the new Carfax said that I had severe damage done. Due to the word “severe”, my truck might as well have a rebuilt title on it. I’m being offered $4000 less than what it is worth. This is not fair, and Carfax should not be allowed to regulate a report, if they never saw or inspected the vehicle.
Reviewed Jan. 15, 2011
We were looking to trade vehicles. You can imagine my horror when the dealer told us that our trade-in was reported as being in an accident in Illinois. We had never had an accident and had never even been to Illinois. When I got home and researched Carfax complaints, I was really worried that this could become a huge problem. I emailed Carfax on a Wednesday. I got a personal email from Tia the next day with a link to the "correction" form. I filled out the pdf form with all the requested info and emailed it to Tia. I got a response on Friday (again from Tia), saying she had requested the accident report from Illinois. I got a final email from Tia saying the matter had been resolved. She included a link for a free Carfax report so I could verify that the accident report had been removed. This was obviously a case of the wrong VIN number being entered somewhere. I got a very personal and very timely response from Carfax. I don't know what more I could have asked for.
Reviewed Jan. 13, 2011
I have a Hummer H2 VIN **. Last week I had the vehicle sold and the buyer backed out last minute. After taking time off from my job etc., the purchaser contacted me and stated that the vehicle was a TMU, as specified by the Carfax report that he had just pulled out. He notified me that he purchased another Hummer and that he was very disappointed with me not disclosing such pertinent information with him regarding the high dollar amount of this vehicle. So now I am stuck with a Hummer that needed to be sold in order to pay for the new car my wife had purchased. I had to sell the Hummer as we cannot afford another payment with the house we had recently purchased and other misc. bills generated by our three year old son.
It turns out that the issue on the Carfax was a mileage discrepancy caused by someone altering the odometer into a computer from the last time the vehicle was inspected. I have not seen the report and was told all of this by the last 2 individuals who refused to even look at the truck, thanks to Carfax! There was never and I repeat never any issue with this vehicle's mileage. I contacted Carfax today and they were 110% no help in the matter at all. Now I am stuck with additional payments that we cannot afford and a vehicle I cannot sell for what it is worth, again all thanks to Carfax. It has bogus unverified reporting techniques.
In the next month I will not be able to afford the payment, my credit is going to be ruined especially when they come to repossess the vehicle. I cannot afford any more payments and I will still owe money due to the fact that after they run it through an auction and this report, I will only recover a fourth of the value. Then I can foresee my house getting foreclosed due to the fact that Carfax printed an information without even verifying it first.
I lost out on a $20,000.00+ sale. I was selling this vehicle since I purchased a new one. Now I have to pay for both, which I cannot afford anymore. I will seek legal restitution, etc.
Reviewed Jan. 11, 2011
We purchased a 2002 Lexus for our 18-year-old son. Carfax reports came back clean. Now, (a year later) my son's car is deemed 'unsafe' by a local car repair. The car was evidently involved in an accident before our purchase. We found out that the car has had major repairs (welded parts from other cars) that now interfere with the structural integrity of the vehicle. We have chosen to sell the car (with full disclosure) so our son can ride in a vehicle that is safe! Shame on Carfax for ripping off customers and selling them false reports on cars that would otherwise be deemed unsafe! Is there a lawsuit against this company?!
Reviewed Jan. 8, 2011
You charged me for 2 requests on 01/09/2010 with approval codes ** & **. I filed a claim & you sent me an email on 2/5/2010 advising that a consumer affairs analyst would contact me via email. I have yet to hear from you. I want my $37.50.
I am retired and I need my money.
Reviewed Dec. 30, 2010
I was trading in my Audi A4 which was not involved in any accidents. I was sole owner and Carfax repented damage to rear quarter panel due to an accident. This inaccurate report cost me over $1000 in trade in value.
Reviewed Dec. 28, 2010
Single carfax charged to my credit card on 12/22/10. This morning (12/28/10) I went to access my report but was told I'd need to purchase another report as my account had expired on 02/20/2011, 54 days hence!
Reviewed Dec. 20, 2010
Our 2010 Honda Accord with Approx 9000.00 miles was involved in an accident. The front bumper area was side swiped by a car running a red light. The bumper, fenders, lights and hood, had to be replaced. There was also some minor frame damage. The insurance company paid the costs, except for our deductions. We decided to trade in this car for a new one and informed the dealer by our own omission of the details of the accident.
The Car Fax had no information regarding this damage, but we still took a 6000.00 loss on the trade in value. Here is an outfit that determines the value of cars with incomplete data. I was instructed to initial a check list stating there was no frame damage and I question the finance personal about this and his reply was that we were honest people. So now I wonder if this car is going to be resold at a much higher value than what I received for the trade in? Will they use this bogus Car Fax report to sell the car and bring in thousands more than they deducted from our trade in value. Something seems sleazy doing business in this manner. Thank you.
Reviewed Dec. 16, 2010
The vehicle was sold with a clean car fax report. I just received the computer print out from my insurance company stating that the vehicle was in a wreck and reported through a state agency. We bought the vehicle on August 27th 2007 and according to my email today, it was in a collision on August 24th 2005. The vehicle was put in service on November 17th 2004. Autocheck is what my insurance company sent me to look at and it shows all the information about the vehicle.
I consider this fraud. Had the carfax that the dealership swears by been accurate, we would not have bought the vehicle.
Reviewed Nov. 21, 2010
Had what I thought was a low mileage car in great running shape to trade in on a newer used vehicle? I bought the car in 2004 with a clean Carfax. Fast forward to today. The dealer from which I was purchasing the replacement car ran a Carfax which reported that my car was involved in an accident (rear ender) in which there was no damage and was able to drive off. One small problem. The accident was reported in Florida. I have never been to Florida with this car. This cost me $4,000 in resale value. The dealer was nice enough to add an extra $500 to the trade in to get me to take the deal but I refused. Not their fault. It's Carfax that has the wrong data and the question is do I want to go through the effort and time necessary to try to correct the problem, or just take the deal and cut my losses. The Carfax report will always be there no matter where I take the car for a trade in.
Reviewed Nov. 8, 2010
Hello! My name is Scott. I am a self employed carpenter and have had two trucks for the past 4 years. During the hard time in the past year, I have found it to hard to keep both trucks. I decided I would sell my E-250 van. I went to auto trader and work up a deal then drove to Honda City in Levittown NY. They looked at the van and said they could pay $3500. Of course I asked for $3900 hoping to meet in the middle. They said, wait one min till the run a CarFax report- upon returning the offer went down to $2000.
When I asked, "Why?" They said because of the carfax report. It states that the van was in a accident with damage. It took a while but I did recall getting tapped in the rear back a few years ago. The insurance found the girl who hit me at fault. She had to put a claim in repairs on her car. My van, however, is a E-250 work van with a step bumper in the rear. It weighs in at 8500lbs and a car in no match. There was no claim filed on my van because there was no damage at all. The van was check out by Village Auto and given a clean bill of health. When trying to contact Carfax to fix this problem, I get no help, no phone numbers or live people to chat with online. Now, I need to sell what can do not to take a $1500 or more loss.
Reviewed Nov. 6, 2010
We purchased a Honda Ridgeline on New Year's Eve 2009 (9 months ago) from Showcase Honda. We purchased it as a certified used Honda. They even showed us the Carfax proving that the car had not been in any accidents or had any other damage, etc. Today, we tried to trade this vehicle in on a less expensive vehicle. We were informed that the Ridgeline we own had been in a serious wreck two months before we purchased it. We told them they were wrong and they showed us the Carfax they had just pulled up and now Carfax was showing that the previous owners had been in a very serious wreck causing extensive damage to the truck.
Therefore, we are now upside down by $7,000 instead of being even. Had the original Carfax shown this, we never would have purchased this vehicle. The bank would never have financed it either. The sale price reflected that the car had never been damaged.
Reviewed Nov. 5, 2010
I was parked in front of a deli store in Teaneck, NJ when I saw a vehicle backing up towards my direction. The driver did not see me and hit my car lightly. Nothing was broken and only the car mask was out of its place due to the light impact. I filed a police report and the other vehicle insurance company paid me for the repairs of my vehicle.
I am trying to sell my car and the Carfax report shows my car hit a parked vehicle plus my car was towed. That is not true and I am having problems trying to sell my vehicle due to this wrong information.
Reviewed Oct. 29, 2010
Carfax has my vehicle listed in an accident in 2007. This never happened. I moved to Michigan in '06 and have never been in an accident. The vehicle had 3000 miles on it when I bought it in Florida in December '04. I would like this erroneous info removed as I am seriously considering a new vehicle. Thank you.
Reviewed Oct. 28, 2010
Carfax is owned by R. L. Polk & Co. ** Hwy. Southfield, MI 48033 **
No refund yet, but I have filed a dispute with my card company. The point of this post was to expose Carfax to actual contact from their unhappy victims, so call them up and let them know what you think!
Reviewed Oct. 21, 2010
Several years ago, my vehicle sustained damage to the underside when a hit and run driver bumped my car which caused my vehicle to spin on the Interstate and slid into the concrete drainage ditch adjacent to the highway. The vehicle was repaired through my insurance by the vehicle's dealership using all new factory parts. There was no damage where the hit and run driver hit me because it was on the flexible bumper. Now because of Carfax Report reporting "accident" when I try to trade in the vehicle the dealership devalues my vehicle by more than $9,000.
Reviewed Oct. 18, 2010
Now unless I find someone that lives under a rock to sell this car to, I'm stuck with it basically until it's paid off, which is still a while away yet. Thanks, Carfax. Thanks for nothing.
Reviewed Oct. 15, 2010
I received my vehicle history report and it is worthless. Does anyone have a telephone number for Carfax?
Reviewed Oct. 14, 2010
CarFax states that my vehicle was in accident four times. I had written this company twice and stated the information was incorrect The lady name Mary ** stated the information was given by the state on New Jersey Motor Vehicle. The information that CarFax have stated that I hit four parked cars on 8/03/2004, 1/30/2005, 3/13/2005 and 10/17/2008. This is not true. when I wrote them back and told Mary the information is wrong, she sent me an email stating that DMV have submitted the information. When I contacted DMV, they stated they never gave CarFax any information and my car or I never hit anyone or any parked cars. When I email them back with the information, Mary emailed back and stated they retract the information about me and not the fact that the car was not involved in four accidents. CarFax then wanted me to send personal information about myself and the car which I feel is wrong.
This information is very damaging to me . For when I try to sell or trade this vehicle, people will think that I had four accidents and that I hit four parked cars. The information had all ready damaged me when I went to trade the vehicle in; that is how I found out about the information that CarFax placed in their records.
Reviewed Oct. 13, 2010
We purchase this 2004 Yukon XL c1500 (VIN **) on 03/02/2009 and my husband checked the wrong box by mistake on the mileage report. We did not realize the error until we try to trade in—the value plump drastically. We had to get to our seller, the original owner, and get an affidavit to FLA motor vehicle stating the correct mileage and by this correct the title to actual mileage. We were told by Florida Motor Vehicle Department this would fix the problem with Carfax and this was done in 05/28/2010.
Carfax has not corrected their report of incorrect actual mileage and all dealers pull this report and used it to tell us our SUV is worthless. This is a terrible loss for us with a vehicle that actually has a real value over 14k. This report on our SUV by Carfax is totally detrimental for our economic value. Please, if there is a way to communicate with Carfax and state our problem, we need help. Our SUV is a pamper one. I am the second owner and would like to trade it for a newer one. Thank you for your assistance.
Minett
Reviewed Oct. 10, 2010
On 04/03/2009, I purchased a 2006 Chrysler vehicle from a dealership (now closed). The Dealer provide a "Car Fax" report. The vehicle was reported clean, no accidents or repairs.
On 10/05/2010, We tried to sell the vehicle and the dealership checked "Car Fax" and the vehicle came back with accident and major damage. The vehicle has never been damaged or repaired during my ownership. I contacted "Car Fax", E-mail only, and was told the "Car Fax" can receive vehicle damage up to two year in the past, and they are not responsible for errors or omissions or late entries.
Dealerships and private parties rely on buying and selling vehicle based on accurate and timely information. I feel "Car Fax" defrauded me with untimely information. We been damaged to the tone of $2,000.
Reviewed Sept. 29, 2010
I paid Carfax to have unlimited access to their reports for one month. When I try to log in, they say that my email address is not on file. I can't find the email address to contact them about my problem. A way to contact them ought to be clearly labeled on all of their webpages. Thanks.
Reviewed Sept. 24, 2010
I went to trade-in my vehicle and in the process of pulling up all my information, the dealership ran a Carfax.com report on my car. The information said that I was rear-ended and had my bumper replaced on my BMW. Based on this information, Carfax suggested that there was an $8,000 loss to my vehicle price! I nearly fell out of my seat when I heard this.
Here are the facts. My car was parked in a garage, my bumper was scraped. The person who scraped it left a note and paid for the damage, which was minimal. It was a faint scratch! Needless to say I took this person up on her offer. I have a high-end sports car and so does she. It cost $3,000 to fix the bumper. It’s in mint condition and looking better than ever. The bumper was buffed and repainted. Apparently, the repair shop reported this claim to Carfax. Fine, but the details of the incident were not reported correctly. So here is what I am dealing with, an $8,000 loss on my trade-in plus another $3,000 to fix the bumper. That puts the total negative cost at $11,000. This is an atrocity that a faint scratch would cause this much financial stress because of an inaccurate Carfax report. I would have been better off never fixing my car and trading it in as is and taking a loss of a few thousand dollars instead of over 10 grand in losses.
This is an unconscionable act. I do not know how Carfax and these dealerships get away with this robbery of consumers. It is not fair that there is no other recourse with these people. They list no contact information, no address, email or number. I cannot get an explanation as to why this report exists. I don't know who the "expert" is that tells the dealership my car is worth $8000 LESS! The car is in perfect condition. And on top of that, the dealership has some sort of paint measuring device and gave me some excuse saying that the car has to go to auction since the bumper was painted. What consumer measures the paint on all panels of the car and demands an $8000 drop in price?
This tool costs $1,800. If I could knock $8000 off a car with that tool, sign me up. Carfax and the dealerships are a bunch of frauds, scam artists, cheaters and liars. What a disgrace that anyone has to interact with such unscrupulous people. They should all be jailed for participating in abhorrent schemes like this. We work too hard in this country for our money to be treated like this and have no recourse.
Reviewed Sept. 15, 2010
Carfax does not issue accurate or timely reports. Example, when we bought our Honda Accord in April 2007, we received a clean Carfax report. Now, 3 years later, upon trying to trade in the Honda, we found out that the car was in a major accident in July 2006. Yet it was not reported until 2 years later in 2008. This pretty much makes my car worth thousands less because of this report.
Who owns these reports? Now, the Honda dealer says they are not responsible for selling me damaged car even though they inspected it, and certified it. It was Carfax's problem. Carfax will say they only report what is reported to them, so my tough luck! So really, no one is responsible, no one is accountable and in reality Carfax reports are useless, inaccurate, untimely and are being perpetrated on the consumer as exactly the opposite! This is blatantly false and misleading.
Reviewed Sept. 15, 2010
I tried to sell my vehicle and found that there is an accident reported in Carfax. The dealerships reduce the price for approximately $3000. The vehicle was involved in an accident but had no damage at all. Backing out of a parking lot, I hit another car with the trailer hitch into its plastic bumper. The bumper had a light scratch. That happened at about .5 mph or so.
Reviewed Aug. 29, 2010
I am selling my 6year old car. A buyer came to my house and agreed to purchase my car. He then called to say that Carfax showed 6 "reports" on the vehicle and he then felt that my car was a horrible investment. 6 reports would scare me away too! I am the original owner and was lightly rear-ended 4 years ago. This is not accurate and cost me the sale. It is very difficult to sell a car in this market and my buyer offered close to the full amount. Carfax caused the loss of this sale and now the value of my excellent condition car has decreased! Talking to a live person at Carfax is impossible.
Reviewed Aug. 25, 2010
I applied for what I thought was a free report and ended up paying $44. I tried to call someone, but of course there is no number and when I e-mailed the help desk, I got no response. The offers are very misleading. I'm out of $44 dollars for something that was advertised as free.
Reviewed Aug. 24, 2010
On 8/21/10 Carmax filed a report on my 2007 Cadillac at the request of Dew Cadillac in Pinellas county, FL. The report showed a inconsistent odometer reading on 08/07/09 of 30,321. This is wrong and I have the car records of this date to prove it. Try to contact Carmax to resolve a problem! I can't even get a customer rep to the phone.
Reviewed Aug. 20, 2010
They are incorrectly reporting my vehicle mileage due for an Arizona Inspection Station visit back in 2007. Instead of 37,000 miles it reads 137,000. Their website has absolutely no contact information on it. This is criminal. Adversely affecting my vehicles value and causing me grief should I ever want to sell it.
Reviewed Aug. 16, 2010
I purchased a Car Fax Report and cannot get one. I am always taken back to the purchase.
Reviewed Aug. 10, 2010
On July 19, 2010, I bought the Unlimited CARFAX Reports for $44.99. The idea was that I can get as many reports as I wanted for 30 days, as long as I didn't use them for commercial purposes. I live in Winnetka, CA. I started getting CarFax reports from home. I wasn't buying or selling cars or providing the reports to anyone who was. But after only one week, CarFax deactivated my account without as much as an email explaining why! When I tried to log in, I got a generic message that my account was deactivated and if I wanted to know why, then I should send an email. Well I did and they replied, but they didn't tell me why they deactivated my account. Instead, they gave me a generic reply that I agreed to the terms and conditions without saying which ones I have supposedly violated or how, then went on to advertise their commercial services to me!
This is very unfair. If they feel that I am not supposed to use their service, they should let me know and refund my money. I paid $44.99, it should be for 5 reports. I only used one.
Reviewed July 29, 2010
2 years ago, I bought a pre-owned 2005 BMW 530i from I believe Gwinnett Suzuki in Duluth, GA. They handed me the Carfax report and it was clean. On July 28, 2010, I went to a different dealership to see if I could trade the car in for something else. This dealership pulled up an Autfacts report. That report showed that the car was from New York and had either been a rental or a lease. It was also involved in an accident that included uni-body frame damage. According to the dealership, that is not good as it is harder to repair making the car's safety and issue.
Needless to say, I was shocked. That devalued the car so much that I could not even trade it in without losing and arm and a leg. How is this possible? I would like to sue for damages as now I am stuck with a car I cannot get out from. I tried to trade in the car on July 28, 2010 thinking everything was okay. They dealership pulled a report from Autofacts that showed the car was a rental/lease and that it had frame damage when it was sold at auction in Georgia. None of this was on the Carfax report. So now the car's value has plummeted because of this report.
Reviewed July 24, 2010
I'm trying to sell our GMC truck. Our son had an accident on the road due to his inattention. Carfax is calling it a mechanical error in the truck, and no one will touch it, not even an auction house will buy it! We need to sell the truck so my son can buy a more economical car, because he is going away to college. We need to get the truck's value to $10,500 in order to get a decent used car. It won't happen now.
Reviewed July 10, 2010
I bought a used car in June 2009 and had a carfax that said it was a clean car, 2 owners. I paid $16,200. I went to sell the car last week, the carfax said it had been in a wreck and had multiple owners. $6,000 loss. Do not trust a carfax!
Reviewed July 6, 2010
Received a totally useless report paid for regarding car. Interested in buying and can find no way to contact Carfax.com to find out why.
Reviewed July 2, 2010
I brought car in June 16, 2008 and it was new. In April 2009, someone hit back in and had 5000.00 dollars damage. Had been fixed and me and my wife had it valued at luck Chevy. 4500 dollars at that time because they said it had frame damage on vehicle from the accident. We went to dodge dealership to check on van and found that carfax is wrong. It had damage report on frame from 5/3/08 and we brought car 6/16/08. This is why we cannot get rid of the car for good price. Could someone call me please.
Reviewed June 28, 2010
When I came to sell my Mercedes in CA, the CARFAX showed that there was inaccuracy in mileage. It turns out that someone in a different state had used my VIN on a similar stolen car that showed much higher mileage. I worked on this case for 5 months with CARFAX people. I even got them reports from the DMV that proves my case but they would not change the report. I lost over $5000 when I sold the car since I couldn't sell the car for the price at the true mileage. I think CARFAX is bad news and people should not trust this company for their car info.
Reviewed June 26, 2010
In 2008, my brand-new car, an Audi s4, was rear-ended by a young woman on a clear morning with little traffic. Traffic slowed, but she failed to notice this and hit me in the rear bumper with damage to the trunk. The airbags did not deploy, the frame was not damaged, and I was not hurt. I was thinking of trading this car for another and decided to run a Carfax. The report on the Carfax indicated I caused the accident. I did not; I was rear-ended. The frame was damaged; it was not. And the airbags deployed; they did not.
Let me say that I had no idea such data was being compiled. Carfax did not inform me that such data was being sold as gospel truth and did not in anyway check the validity of that data. To further complicate matters, to correct their error involves considerable paperwork and time with no assurance it will have any effect.
This outfit presenting itself as a legitimate body is in fact a money-making scam hitting car dealers and car buyers alike and should be closed down. Where is our government to protect us from such fraud? A class action lawsuit is in order here.
Reviewed June 21, 2010
I went to trade in my vehicle and was shown a CARFAX report that said I had an accident on 7/12/05. I never had an accident with this vehicle. It cost me $500 in trade in value. I don't know how to reach them to correct this error. In looking at complaints about CARFAX; this seems to be a regular problem with them. They must be regulated or closed down. I will be happy to discuss this with any that wants to contact me.
Reviewed June 12, 2010
I went to trade in a RAV 4. The Carfax report the dealer pulled had numerous errors in the car history. The most significant was that the air bags went off in an accident. I had a copy of the auto body shop work order and they did not replace the air bags. Dealer said it was already in the report and that's what they need to show to sell the car.
I took a $3,000 hit to my trade in due to this "service". I feel as if I was side swiped by car fax. I didn't have an opportunity to refute this without walking on a new car deal that was fair. I would not have let my daughter drive the car for the last 3 years if it were as bad as car fax purported the accident to be. Carfax needs to allow people to put in their side of the story and document where the info came from.
Reviewed May 27, 2010
My Mini Cooper had a scratch in the hood caused by a fallen object out of a plumber's truck as we were driving down the highway. I reported it to police, had the hood repaired. Carfax shows it as an accident. When trying to sell the Mini, I get offers $1000 less "due to the Carfax". I'm also asked if the airbag went off, and if there's any frame damage.
Reviewed May 26, 2010
I purchased a brand new 2007 Chevrolet Silverado Crew Cab Z-71 LT back in July 2007 from a Chevrolet dealership in Georgia. Because I am an active duty military and was stationed in GA, I tried to have the dealership register the truck in Oklahoma (my home state) and they said they could not do it. So the truck was registered in GA.
In October of 2007, I reregistered the truck in Oklahoma. I have recently tried to trade the truck in and was told they would only give me $14,000 for a truck that still retails for $29,000 for the truck because the CARFAX report is showing that the truck has title problems due to the odometer being incorrect. If I am to trade my truck in, which I still owe $25,000 for retails of $29,000 and, I will only get $14,000 for it. I have spoken with the state of Oklahoma several times about this issue and they have informed me that my title is good and that there is nothing wrong with my truck or the title and that CARFAX is wrong. Oklahoma has also told me that they do not use the term branded that CARFAX is using and that there is no issue with my title. But I cannot trade it in because of the CARFAX report.
Reviewed May 22, 2010
Why did you advertise Carfax is free when it really is not?
Reviewed May 7, 2010
Inaccurate report caused a sale not to go through on my vehicle.
Reviewed May 6, 2010
Trading in car on new car purchase. Carfax report showed an accident on trade-in car that had not occurred. Claimed that it was an accident that disabled vehicle and involved a police report. It never happened. Disputed report with dealership and threatened to terminate deal unless we obtained our desired trade-in value. Eventually settled for $500 less than our initial goal.
Reviewed April 26, 2010
The Carfax is inaccurate so that I can't sell my car easily. The Carfax writing shows the accident was big so that the airbag went off, which is totally wrong. The accident was not a major one and the airbag didn't go off at all. Please correct it.
Reviewed April 20, 2010
The person who put in the information about the damage to my car listed that there was frame damage to the car. There was no frame damage. I sent a letter from the auto repair company stating that there was no frame damage, but now the Carfax people want a bunch of paperwork. How can they have so much power that if they put something erroneous, it is up to me to prove that what they listed is wrong. And, there is no way to actually talk to someone. All you can do is e-mail or fax.
Reviewed March 26, 2010
I recently sold my 2006 Dodge Ram. I purchased it from a reputable dealer and have used it for 24,000 miles. I pulled a Carfax in February 2008 and it was clean. The person buying my truck pulled a Carfax on 03/2010 and it showed the truck has a salvage title. That information was not on original report nor is it true. I sold another vehicle several years ago and it did have a salvage title. Also, it showed the mileage when I bought the truck was 64,000. Then a year later, it showed mileage as 54000. It was a typo from the inspection station.
Reviewed March 5, 2010
When I went to a dealership today to trade in my 2004 Acura for a new vehicle, the salesperson pulled a Carfax on the Acura which showed that it had been in an accident in September 2007. Unfortunately, the report showed that my car had run into the other vehicle and had flipped onto its roof. This is the exact reverse of what occurred and what the police report shows.
I contacted Carfax to get the information corrected and was told that I had to provide sufficient documentation to prove it to them or they would need seven weeks to research it themselves. Now, here is a for profit business who charge for supposedly reliable information which they generate from thousands of data sources, when challenged it then takes them weeks to get their information right. It seems to me that either they are having to research an awful lot of inaccurate reports or do not treat the integrity of their reporting very highly. So far, I am out a minimum of the $2500 which I lost on trade-in value.
Reviewed Feb. 23, 2010
Consistent incorrect/over-billing issues. Carfax has attempted to submit incorrect bills for services unused and is very unwilling to determine accuracy. Carfax places the responsibility of accurate billing upon the customer.
Reviewed Feb. 13, 2010
I went to Carfax to get information on a car I was about to purchase and I had to pay $44 in order to get the information. I put my card information in there and it accepted it, took the money out of my account and then told me there was a problem that they could not help me. I want my money back. There is no phone number or anything for me to contact them.
Reviewed Feb. 8, 2010
In 2007, I purchased a 2006 Dodge Viper from Huntington Beach Motor Cars. They showed me a CARFAX report and the history on the car was clean. In early 2009, I tried to sell the car, but to my surprise, auto-check came back with an accident. It is now early 2010, one year later, and I am still trying to sell it. I am receiving bids for half of the cost of what I paid for the car due to the accident! The car is gorgeous and immaculate. I bought it at 8k miles and it only has 14k miles on it now. As soon as any interested parties see the accident in the records, the value immediately drops by 15k!
Reviewed Feb. 8, 2010
I bought my son who will be getting his driver's license in the fall a 2004 Honda Civic coupe EX. The salesman gave me the history and knew the seller personally. I decided to get a Carfax report for the first time on the vehicle. While I didn't find any gross discrepancies, out of 12 pages for $34.99 only 4 pages had useful information. One page was a survey, another was a buy back guarantee and the other 6 pages where opinions and safety ratings.
Reviewed Jan. 27, 2010
In 2004, I bought a 2003 Corvette at Classic Chevrolet in Grapevine, Texas. The car only had 9,000 miles on it and I paid 35,000 dollars for it. I had the dealership run a Carfax report on it and it came back with no accidents reported. I kept it for 4 years and then decided to sell it on eBay. It only had 22,000 miles on it and I got lots of bids on it. The winning bidder had bid 30,000 dollars on the car. Then when I went to get his information, he had run a Carfax report and it said that it had been in an accident in 2003. I couldn't get anyone to buy my car. I ended up selling it back to Classic Chevrolet for 23,500 dollars. A total loss of 11,500 dollars! Thanks for nothing Carfax!
Reviewed Jan. 20, 2010
I purchased a used car in 2005 and used Carfax to make sure the car had not been involved in any accidents. It is now 2010 and I plan to sell the car. Another Carfax was ordered and I cannot believe the new Carfax has a report of an damage to the car in 2003. This was not on my original 2005 Carfax. What good is it? I will probably get less for the car in sale or trade. I would have paid less for the car if I had known.
Reviewed Dec. 10, 2009
I traded in my Subaru Legacy on 11-25-09. At that time, the dealer gave me a copy of the CARFAX report and in a highlighted area, it stated on 6-19-2009 that my car was in an accident with another vehicle. The dealer explained I would have to take a reduction for the trade in because of this. So I contacted the NYS DMV and got the report - that cost me money. The report stated it was with 2 totally different vehicles. I contacted CARFAX and they made it disappear, which is amazing. And they are taking no responsibility for my loss.
Reviewed Nov. 18, 2009
Reviewed Nov. 18, 2009
Reviewed Nov. 16, 2009
Reviewed Nov. 14, 2009
Reviewed Nov. 11, 2009
Reviewed Nov. 9, 2009
Reviewed Oct. 25, 2009
Reviewed Oct. 23, 2009
Reviewed Oct. 21, 2009
Reviewed Oct. 16, 2009
Reviewed Oct. 15, 2009
Reviewed Oct. 12, 2009
Reviewed Sept. 26, 2009
Reviewed Sept. 17, 2009
Reviewed Aug. 30, 2009
I pulled a Carfax on my 2003 Jaguar XJ8 and it said it was perfect, a great car, so I bought it. When I got it home, I went through the glove box and found service records for a wreck that cost over $10K to fix. This is the second time this happened to me. The first time was in 2003 with a 98 Nissan Pathfinder, same thing happened, but I got the money back for the Carfax report. However, I think I should have gotten the money I lost for buying the car, but I didn't even bother because I know I won't get anything.
Reviewed Aug. 25, 2009
My car was involved in an accident with a very minor hole on the rear bumper. The dealer said this could not be repaired and has to be replaced with new one. So, the replace was done and the other parties insurance paid for the repair. This happened on December 22nd, 2008. Now, I am selling my car and one of the potential buyer said Carfax reported an accident. That is fine. But the way it is reported is no details are provided and the report is misguiding and scaring away all the buyers. I am leaving to India on August 30th, 2009 and till now I am unable to sell my car because of the misguiding Carfax report which has marked my car as an alert involved in an accident with no details at all. My car VIN: **.
I have heard from many buyers that my car was involved in a major accident which is not true. I have all the documents required to Carfax.com about the repair and the phone numbers of the dealers. They don’t have any contact number and they have not responded to my e-mail. Thanks. Consequences: I am unable to sell my car and in 3 days I am leaving to India. The loss is at least $4,000.
Reviewed Aug. 24, 2009
I put this car on eBay. I didn't get any bids near its value. I later found that Carfax reported it had failed emission test in NC. This car has never failed emission test; however, the inspection expired after I lost the keys and time elapsed before I could get some made. I'm unable to sell the vehicle. And I'm out the fees to promote on eBay, approximately $50.
Reviewed Aug. 16, 2009
I pulled a Carfax report on 7/25/08 for a 2003 Acura TL Type-S, which showed no accidents in the history. It basically appeared "clean", so to speak. There were no recordings that sparked suspicion. I have had this car for 1 year and now can afford the car I really want, so I prepared to put it for sale. I pulled another Carfax right before I planned to list the car. It shows an "Accident Warning" with a notation that the car was in an accident 3/24/07 in Manhattan, KS with functional damage. It also notes that Carfax reported this accident on 3/18/09, nearly 2 years after the accident occurred, and over 6 months after I purchased what appeared to be an accident-free car.
It is unfair that because this was not noted in a timely fashion that I was not given the benefit of this information before I purchased this car, but whoever buys it after me will. I expect to lose a significant amount of money on this vehicle. I'm not sure what the point of Carfax is. They do not appear to provide the service they claim to provide. This car has already cost me approximately $3,000.00. I expect to sell it at a significant loss and can then calculate more accurately my economic damage.
Reviewed Aug. 14, 2009
I contacted Carfax about an accident reported for my vehicle. Here is the exact e-mail I sent to them: Incorrect record/Information: No comment - no damage to vehicle.
Details: Two teenage boys made a right turn on red and swung out into the left lane, as I was driving through the intersection. Their vehicle left a paint streak across the right rear fender and wheel. At the time, I had no way of knowing the extent of the damage. To avoid insurance issues, I elected to call the Chesterfield Police. So, it determined without a shadow of a doubt that it was not my fault. In fact, the driver was issued a ticket. Later, when I took the vehicle to Elco Chevrolet Body Shop, it was determined that the paint streak did not cause any damage; and they were able to use paint remover to paint on both the fender and wheel. There is no notation regarding the extent nor cost of the damage in the Carfax.
Documentation: I can ask Elco's Body Shop manager to write something on their letterhead to explain what the repair entailed or whatever else you require to further clarify this issue, as I do not have any documentation because they removed the paint while I waited and did not charge me. The also know how picky I am about the vehicle and wanted to make sure I was satisfied with the results. No one has ever said a word about it since when looking at the car, and I forgot about it until I recently checked the Carfax report.
All I wanted for them to do was to annotate the incident and add that there was no body work damage and no cost for the repair. Their reply: Carfax has concluded its research for the case. I have reviewed the police issued accident report and have verified that the report does state that this vehicle was struck by another vehicle and damage was noted to the right side of this vehicle.
Because a police-issued accident report is considered to be an official government document, I will not be able to change the Carfax report until a corrected police report has been issued. If you are able to obtain a corrected police report then please fax it to 1-866-728-6455 and I will reopen this research case. I recently sent you a separate email with a 14-day link to access and print the updated Carfax Vehicle History Report. (end of reply)
I went back to ELCO (Enterprise Leasing Company's Chevrolet dealership) to talk to the body shop manager, who had originally handled the issue. He was no longer there. But the manager of the body shop and repair shop agreed to write a repair order stating exactly what happened. Basically, while determining the extent of the damage, he used paint remover and determined there was no damage other than to remove the rest of the paint at no cost to me. I faxed this document to Carfax. Now, Mike changed his mind; and here is what he said:
I did receive the new repair order. I'm still not able to add repair estimate of $0. The estimate first says that there is no damage. Then, it says there were scrapes and paint transfer and that work was done to fix this damage. But the bill does not reflect the work that was completed. The main issue is that I cannot add a record stating this vehicle sustained no damage when both the police report and the repair order states this vehicle sustained damage. At this time, I will not be able to make any changes to the Carfax report. He also told me to ask the Chesterfield Police department to alter their report. Of course, that is not possible and not what I asked. I replied that the police department was not responsible for estimating damage, and he replied:
"Carfax received a record stating that this vehicle was involved in an accident where another vehicle struck the right side of this vehicle. Upon your request, Carfax obtained a copy of the accident report and verified that another vehicle did indeed strike the right side of this vehicle. At no point has Carfax made any estimate as to the damage that was sustained to this vehicle. At no point does the police-issued accident report make an estimate as to the amount of damage this vehicle sustained. Carfax has accurately reported the exact information that has been issued by the police department, which made the original report. As you know, Carfax does not inspect vehicles and thus must rely on its sources for any damage extent information. No damage extent has been reported to Carfax from any of its sources for this vehicle. As such, Carfax is not able to make any estimate of damage for this vehicle. I will not be able to make any change to the Carfax Vehicle History Report at this time."
I replied that ELCO is listed on the Carfax report as a credible and verifiable source, but the repair ticket explaining the situation with the car was not "good enough" and that he was twisting the words of the repair ticket to avoid using it. In summary, Carfax originally agreed to annotate the report if they received a document from a credible and verifiable source. They later changed their minds after twisting the words of the repair ticket, claiming it was not part of the original police report.
Reviewed Aug. 4, 2009
I had a false report made to Carfax about my vehicle. I went to trade my vehicle in and was told there was structural/frame damage done. My insurance adjuster went back and looked at the claim and no mention of frame damage. Now, that is on my vehicle history report and it is a big red flag! Nobody knows who reported it, nice! The consequences of the false report are that it is going to be harder to sell my SUV, if I am able to sell it at all.
Reviewed July 30, 2009
I have a 1998 Mazda B2500 pickup that I am trying sell. The Carfax report on the vehicle says that it was involved in an accident in 2002 and sustained heavy damage to the front end and that the airbags deployed! My son bumped into the back of another car and dented the bumper and that's it! There was very minor damage and the airbags did not deploy! Now no one wants to buy the truck because of the Carfax report! I have tried to contact Carfax and simply received an email that they will look into it.
I cannot believe that they get away with this kind of thing. Now I'm stuck with a truck that is in perfect condition after the front bumper was replaced (no damage underneath) and Carfax couldn't care less. This company needs to be sued and made to provide a way for car owners to dispute false information. They should be required to investigate claims and correct false data in a reasonable amount of time. Looking at all of the complaints on the internet confirms that this is a huge problem for a lot of people and Carfax should be held liable for damages.
Reviewed July 10, 2009
I purchased car in Jan 2007 and verified Carfax report thoroughly. It was a clean title that time and I purchased the car. In 2008, when I got a chance to look Carfax for my car, I got surprised to see an accident record with the previous owner. In 2009, when I try to sell the car to a dealer, I was surprised again to hear that my car has inconsistent odometer reading. After a detailed investigation on the report, I could find that this was caused due to a wrongly entered odometer reading from the purchase I made in Jan 2007 as odometer reading on Jan 2006. Just a single digit in year caused so much problems to sell my car. I am still looking for someone to take my car. There is no proper support from Carfax to correct it. Carfax is playing with people's money. So much stress to contact Carfax and convince dealers. It caused me to lose $2000. It's a scam. Please stop this and try to close this Carfax company.
Reviewed July 8, 2009
I ordered their service and cannot get reports. There is no email or phone number for customer contact. The customer "Help" tab is a blank page.
Reviewed July 4, 2009
I saw her ad on Craigslist. I contacted her and we met after a couple of days. It was about a 2001 Audi S4 - nice looking car. The price was set to $18,000. The car had 35,436 miles on it. This happened back in July of 2007. I liked the car very much and drove it for a couple of miles, got the VIN number and checked the car the same night on Carfax. I paid with a credit card, which should be easily proved. Carfax report did not show anything wrong with the car - "perfect record".
I called her again on the phone and set the price for $18000, including a set of winter tires and wheels for a total of $500. When the Audi dealers ran the report on the car several times I went there, they told me that the car was being totaled, which I did not believe. Now, I want to trade the car and the dealer tells me that the car was being salvaged. The worst thing is that the report shows that the car was being salvaged during the time I have the car (the second owner), which is myself. I got the car in July 2007 and the report says it was salvaged in December of 2007. I have not had any accident, even a simple one with this car - this can be checked.
When asked the previous owner if there were any accidents, she lied to me. She did not tell me anything. Because of the fact that I did not know what was the accident that happened to the car, I myself could have made an accident that could lead to me ending up somewhere. Why did Carfax not show the correct report? I would not have bought the car in this case or haggled over the price to be dropped down with couple of thousands less (most likely I would not buy it). I don't care how often Carfax updates their database. I want accurate data. And now, I cannot trade the car with a dealership because of this. Where are the consumer rights here?
Reviewed July 1, 2009
I requested a vehicle history of the used car I recently purchased. Online application asked all your personal information and credit card number. It doesn't show any results, but they already charged my account.
Reviewed June 25, 2009
Carfax shows on my 1992 Suburban that the odometer has been rolled back. I was going to trade it for a 1994 GMC truck and now I gave the guy the VIN and he found this out which is very untrue. I want this problem solved ASAP.
Reviewed June 17, 2009
I purchased 3 vehicles using information that I received from 3 Carfax reports. The Carfax reports reported that the vehicles had clear titles. Once the purchases were made, the titles read salvage title. I did purchase the buy-back insurance. I have been able to get nothing from Carfax in regards to the automobiles that I purchased. There is no telephone numbers from Carfax. I have been trying to resolve this matter since I made the purchase of the vehicles with no success. The jaguar has had recalls that I cannot have done because of the salvage title. I purchased $85,000 in automobiles that are worth nothing.
Reviewed June 12, 2009
On 5/28/2006, I attempted to use Carfax.com to obtain an online report on a used vehicle for a friend and used my visa debit card. When I clicked continue at the end of entering all the necessary data, their system responded with the message that it was unable to complete the transaction at this time, to try again later. I then canceled the attempt but much to my chagrin, I found out that my account was debited anyway even though I did not receive the report. When I wasn't able to get the report, I had made another purchase and when the Carfax charge hit my account, it caused my account to overdraft and I incurred a $27 overdraft fee in addition to their $29.99. I would like Carfax to investigate and refund my money and all fees associated immediately. I attempted to contact them via the phone number on my bank statement and only received a recording that provided me with their email. I would like to resolve this matter immediately. In this economy, every penny counts and if they could not provide the service then they should not have debited my account.
Reviewed June 4, 2009
I paid $39 twice for a month of unlimited VIN checks. Each time, Carfax deactivated my account without notice. In their website, it states if they suspect I am in the business of car dealing, they will deactivate my account. I am not in the business; however, I am actively shopping to buy a car in a local auction. A friend who has a license lets me into the auction, and I make a list of cars with VINs. I run the VINs, and if I like a few, then he tries to win one for me. I want a deal, and up to now, I have lost all of the bids.
I sent Carfax many emails, asking them to activate my account or refund the money. I am not trying to buy many cars. I am trying to buy one, but I am running many to see if I get lucky and get one for personal use at the best possible (steal) price. Please get them to refund my money and stop advertising unlimited VIN checks. They scammed me for $78. Not fair!
Reviewed June 4, 2009
I purchased my car in part relying on their report. When selling it, their updated report showed an accident date prior to the original report I received. No recourse as they've cleverly hidden behind electronic communications and corporate umbrella. I purchased a car for more than what it was worth and now can not sell for what I deem to be a reasonable price.
Reviewed May 30, 2009
Reviewed May 28, 2009
Reviewed May 28, 2009
Reviewed May 25, 2009
Reviewed May 22, 2009
Reviewed May 6, 2009
Reviewed May 6, 2009
Reviewed May 3, 2009
Reviewed May 1, 2009
Reviewed April 3, 2009
I bought my car in January 2004 and moved from NV to NC in August 2005. Issue # 1: Carfax for my car now shows that NC DMV read my odometer in April 2004 when my car was not even in NC. Issue # 2: They also report that the mileage of my car went from 14K to 120K within a period of 83 days when in fact my car probably did about 120 miles in the same period. These things are terribly affecting the value of my car now that I am about to sell it and it still has only 45K miles on it. KBB shows the value of my car has $7,000 and due to Carfax errors, I can only get about $3,000 for it.
Reviewed March 23, 2009
Reviewed March 19, 2009
Reviewed March 9, 2009
Reviewed March 5, 2009
Reviewed Feb. 27, 2009
Reviewed Feb. 25, 2009
Reviewed Feb. 22, 2009
Reviewed Feb. 17, 2009
Reviewed Feb. 17, 2009
Reviewed Feb. 15, 2009
Reviewed Feb. 15, 2009
Reviewed Feb. 10, 2009
Reviewed Feb. 5, 2009
Reviewed Feb. 4, 2009
Reviewed Feb. 4, 2009
Reviewed Feb. 4, 2009
Reviewed Jan. 24, 2009
Reviewed Jan. 23, 2009
Reviewed Jan. 20, 2009
Reviewed Jan. 16, 2009
Reviewed Dec. 17, 2008
Reviewed Dec. 3, 2008
Reviewed Nov. 25, 2008
Reviewed Nov. 24, 2008
Reviewed Oct. 27, 2008
Reviewed Oct. 27, 2008
Reviewed Oct. 2, 2008
Before I purchased a 2007 Chevy Avalanche I purchased a carfax report and it showed only three hits. All were for registrations. Long story short the entire front end has been replaced (new grill, fender, bumper and repainted from the front doors forward). I know this because there is overspray on the inner fenders and one running board. I don't believe g.m. paints cars after they are built. Also I found out that it was also used for a commercial pilot truck. These did not show-up on the report. I feel like I got screwed by carfax twice. If I had known this about this vehicle I would not have purchased it.
Reviewed Sept. 29, 2008
Originally, I looked at a 2005 RSX Type S, on autotrader with a free CARFAX report. The vehicle showed a CLEAN history and listed no obvious problems. I even had run a CARFAX from the dealership I worked for just to make extra sure. Still, it returned with a CLEAN history.
I eventually bought this RSX, thinking I made a wise choice, since it's CARFAX was CLEAN. Little did I know I had wasted my money buying this car. I found out 3 weeks after I had the car things that shocked me. Took it to an Acura dealer for a repair and was informed the DRIVER'S SEAT RAIL was BENT, indicating an ACCIDENT. The Right Rear Quarter Panel was a REMANUFACTURED PANEL with a DOT badge instead of the factory VIN badge. The PAINT between the TRUNK and the Right Rear Quarter Panel were 2 DIFFERENT SHADES OF BLUE. I was told and shown this by the Acura Service Writer, even told him the CARFAX Report was indeed CLEAN. It's obvious CARFAX doesn't get all the information it says it recieves.
This car cost me a month of my time, and I traded in a perfectly great car for this. It's CRYSTAL CLEAR that you CAN'T even TRUST CARFAX. Whatever car make you're in the market for, have it INSPECTED by that particular MAKE'S dealer.
Reviewed Sept. 25, 2008
Bought a used car that had a clean carfax report, actually was swayed to buy the car by that fact as had been ripped off previously. Husband noted headlights were off, one of the screws didn't line up. Couple of months later, had a tune up, the mechanic proceeded to inform us that the car had been in a major front end collision as had extensive repaired/welded areas.
Went back to dealership who informed us that if it is not reported to carfax, then it will not show up. How can Carfax make the claims they do when reporting is voluntary and they have no idea? In my opinion, this is consumer fraud.
I bought a car that I thought was intact and sound based on the report, but had actually been in a collision. I would not have bought this car had I known.
Reviewed Sept. 21, 2008
I'm trying to sell my 2003 Chrysler Town & Country LX. I know that it's never been in an accident. I entered the VIN on Carfax and came up with 10 incidents! I KNOW it's never been in a wreck. Next, I tried my 2006 Prius. 5 incidents. Both times Carfax wanted money to reveal the incidents. Don't waste your money!
Reviewed Sept. 18, 2008
Bought my New Car a 2004 Nissan 350Z from Myrtle Beach Grand Strand Nissan in South Carolina in 2004 with 260 miles -- in August 2008 my car had only 33,000 miles in excellent condition and I wanted to Trade at Crown Ford in Fayetteville NC -- to my surprise when the dealership ran a CARFAX they told me that they could only give me $8000 for the car since the Car had been in an accident in 2004 one month before I bought it in January 2004 -- the report stated that my car had a collision in Texas with 440 miles & there was Frame Damage to the right rear of the car -- I was floored & depressed. I contacted the Dealer in SC who I bought the car from -- Grand Strand SC Myrtle Beach said their records showed no Claims against the vehicle prior to our purchase & the dealer signed an Affidavit in March 2004 that stated the Mileage was 260 & there had been no collisions/claims on the vehicle. I contacted CARFAX by email & by UPS Overnight to plead my case. Their reply stated that the mileage could not be verified so they removed it -- the 440 miles assigned to a collision were removed due to possible error -- the Frame Damage was removed as that was not accurate -- then they state the Collision Facility was a Home Base facility so they removed Texas & a Third party Insurance Verified that my VIN did incur rear right damage repair but zero frame damage -- CARFAX maintained the Accident occurred -- I asked if they could verify if the claim was paid by Grand Strand Nissan in SC & they responded they do not provide that information -- I have since asked for the cost of the damage & if the claim was paid by somebody from South Carolina -- they have not given any information -- I just want to know if the dealership truly sold me a car using deliberate false information or if CARFAX is in error. I also am retired military & I am shocked that a company like CARFAX would let vague validations pass as truths for the customer & owners. I am truly saddened by the near communistic approach CARFAX has in dealing with our American population.
Reviewed Sept. 16, 2008
They had a wrong carfax report on my car which listed it with a not actual mileage title. After I contacted them, they fixed the problem within 1 week.
Reviewed Sept. 15, 2008
I paid $24.99 for service, but before I finished gathering all of the info, the site timed out. So I went back into the site, and was charged $34.99. I don't mind paying for the first charge, but I don't think I should be required to pay the second charge.
Reviewed Sept. 13, 2008
I purchased Carfax online- the report was pretty much clean- when I went to view the car, the sterring col. was busted from it beingstolen and the car was in an accident- and the milege had been tampered with. I'm extremely upset with this $40 purchase and was denied a refund. DON'T Buy it. it really sounds good- but I feel ripped off.
I wasted my money, and I paid 30 dollars of gas to go and see the vehichle. I'm now out of this money and I feel tormented that I ended up with no car...so embarrssed.
Reviewed Sept. 8, 2008
I purchased carfax unlimited history report on Aug 05 and was using it for a month. On Sep 06 my account has expired. But as I still didn't find a car of my dream on Sep 06 I purchased carfax history report again and my credit card was deducted by $34.99. I received email from carfax that my account is now activated. I tryed to login and received an error - your account is expired. So I wrote email to carfax complaining about it. Nothing happened. I decided to wait till Monday. On Monday morning (9am) I write email to carfax again and received an answer with my email reference number. It was said If your e-mail was sent before 4:00 PM Eastern Time you will receive a reply within two business hours. If sent after 4:00 PM Eastern Time a response will be sent the next business day. Now it is already 12:30pm and I still can' log in to my account. And I can't find any info about refund. I wrote email to carfax about refund but didn't get any answer. This is really fraud company doesn't caring about costomers. Why to write about 2hour answer if they can't keep their word.
About 5 cars which I liked appeared in those 3 days but I couldn't buy them because wanted to check carfax. Of cause all cheap and clean cars were already sold.
Reviewed Aug. 27, 2008
i recently ordered a carfax. i have e-mail them numerous times regarding the 100% satisfaction guaranteed policy. they will e-mail me back and ask if i would like to proceed and i say yes and then that is the end of it. they will not even e-mail me back to let me know what is going on. itys false advertisement to say 100% satisfaction
Reviewed Aug. 18, 2008
I purchased a used car from a dealer who knew the car was in an accident with frame damage. Basically, CarFax did not show the report because the car was not branded. Autocheck shows my car was announced at auction with frame damage and unibody damage. Unfortunately, I did not know about AutoCheck until after I purchased the car.
The dealer has you sign a contract that states they do their best to inspect all vehicles but they do not guarantee the vehicle has been in an accident. How misleading is that when they know it was in an accident. Last night, after I discovered AutoCheck, I ran this dealer's cars on AutoCheck. They have 23 vehicle vins posted on their website, and 8 had frame damage reported at auction. That's 1/3.
The dealer promotes CarFax on their website; however, CarFax does NOT contain auction reports. They do have Lexus on their lot and website that AutoCheck says had announced at auction frame damage; however, this is what that dealer says about the car: The Carfax states the car was in an accident. It looks like there was some minor paint work on the back of the vehicle. It does not look like anything had to be replaced on the vehicle. What they do not tell you is that this car was reported to AutoCheck with frame damage when they purchased it. This dealer is running a scam. I have all the paperwork if you wish to look into this. It is just unreal.
Carfax Company Information
- Company Name:
- Carfax
- Website:
- www.carfax.com
