|
|
CONSUMER NEWS
RECALLS
COMPLAINT FORM
SCAM ALERTS
Small Claims Guide Class Actions Lemon Laws FAQ Newsletters Spanish |
|
|
![]() |
Colorado Claims Genealogy Book Is Bogus |
|||||
|
December 5, 2005
Instead of getting family-specific information, says Attorney General John Suthers, purchasers of the book found general recopies, jokes, and old photographs of people unrelated to them. Suthers filed a consumer protection lawsuit against Morphcorp LLC, a Parker, Colorado company, as well as the company's president and general manager, Maxwell MacMaster, for alleged deceptive advertising and sales of "Family Yearbooks." "Deceptive advertising will not be tolerated in Colorado," said Suthers. "This lawsuit alleges that Morphcorp used deceptive advertising and marketing tactics to sell thousands of ‘Family Yearbooks' to unsuspecting consumers in Colorado and throughout the country." The lawsuit alleges that Morphcorp marketed the "Family Yearbook" as a product of genealogical research that was unique to the consumer's family history. Yet, as the lawsuit alleges, Morphcorp does not conduct any genealogical research specific to the family before printing the Yearbook. In fact, says Suthers, much of the same information, including "family jokes and recipes" and family pictures appear in each Yearbook regardless of the surname for which it was created. The lawsuit charges that MacMaster offered the Yearbooks through direct-mail advertising, which included various false and misleading statements. Among those was a claim by MacMaster and his then-wife that they shared the same last name of the consumer to whom the flyer was sent. The lawsuit also alleges that Morphcorp engaged in improper pricing practices by falsely advertising that the Yearbook was available at a "special pre-publication price" for a limited period of time, when in fact nearly all of the Yearbooks sold were at the "special pre-publication price." In most cases, that price was $44.85, including charges for shipping and handling. Suthers' lawsuit seeks a court order providing refunds to purchasers, civil penalties of up to $2,000 for each violation of the Consumer Protection Act, and attorney fees and costs. The lawsuit also seeks an injunction preventing defendants from engaging in any future false and deceptive advertising of their merchandise. Report Your Experience
|
|||||
Back to the top | |
||||||
Advertisement
|
|
||||
|
AUTOMOTIVE Dealers Manufacturers Service Extended Warranties Lemon Laws Recalls Tires Transporters FAMILY Aging Children, Parenting Recalls Dating Education Entertainment Pets Weddings |
FINANCE Annuities Banks Credit Cards Debt Collection Debt Counseling Insurance Investing Loans Mortgages Payday Loans Student Loans Tax Prep HEALTH Drugs, Pharmacies Health Clubs Hearing Care Hospitals Nursing Homes Nutrition, Diets Vision Care Weight Loss |
HOMEOWNERS & RENTERS Appliances Cookware Furniture Home Improvements Lawn & Garden Movers Pools & Spas Realtors, Rental Agents Recalls Utilities ELECTRONICS Cable TV/DBS Cameras Cell Phones Computers Home Electronics Internet Access Local Phone Service Long Distance VoIP |
SHOPPING In-Home Online Retail Stores Supermarkets Telemarketers TRAVEL Airlines Bus Lines Car Rental Cruises Hotels Travel Agents Trains RESOURCES Class Actions Complaint Form Small Claims Guide Class Actions Lemon Laws |
CONSUMER NEWS Latest News Automotive Telecom Financial Health Homeowners Scams Seniors Travel More ... RECALLS Automotive Children's Products Drugs Food Household Products Sporting Goods ABOUT US FAQ Privacy Policy Advertise With Us Newsroom Syndication Terms of Use |
Terms of Use Your use of this site constitutes acceptance of the Terms of Use
Copyright © 2003-2008 ConsumerAffairs.com Inc. All Rights Reserved. The contents of this site may not be republished, reprinted, rewritten or recirculated without written permission. |
|