How ConsumerAffairs uses cookies

This website utilizes technologies such as cookies to enable essential site functionality, as well as for analytics, personalization, and targeted advertising. To learn more, view the following link:

Assurant Vehicle Service Contracts Reviews

4,943,040reviews on ConsumerAffairs are verified
  • We require contact information to ensure our reviewers are real.
  • Our moderators read all reviews to verify quality and helpfulness.
  • We use intelligent software that helps us maintain the integrity of reviews.

About Assurant Vehicle Service Contracts

Assurant provides vehicle service contracts for new and pre-owned vehicles. Formerly operating as First Extended, Assurant bought out the company in 2018. The company offers five plans and uses an app called Vehicle Care for policyholders to file digital claims, manage their plans and track upcoming vehicle maintenance. Assurant offers plans in all 50 states and even parts of Canada.

Visit vehiclecareplan.com/home
Pros
  • Easy-to-use app
  • All plans are fully transferable
Cons
  • Lack of information on site
  • Plans only offered by dealerships

Assurant Vehicle Service Contracts Reviews

Filter by Rating

  • (391)
  • (61)
  • (49)
  • (60)
  • (307)

Popular Mentions

    How do I know I can trust these reviews about Assurant Vehicle Care?
    • 4,943,040 reviews on ConsumerAffairs are verified.
    • We require contact information to ensure our reviewers are real.
    • We use intelligent software that helps us maintain the integrity of reviews.
    • Our moderators read all reviews to verify quality and helpfulness.
    Top reviews
    • Top reviews
    • Recent
    • Oldest
    • Most helpful

    A link has directed you to this review. Its location on this page may change next time you visit.

    2 featured reviews
    How do I know I can trust these reviews about Assurant Vehicle Care?
    • 4,943,040 reviews on ConsumerAffairs are verified.
    • We require contact information to ensure our reviewers are real.
    • We use intelligent software that helps us maintain the integrity of reviews.
    • Our moderators read all reviews to verify quality and helpfulness.
    Page 8 Reviews 826 - 976
    Verified purchase
    Customer ServiceTech

    Reviewed Aug. 25, 2015

    We spent $2,000 for an extended warranty from this company. After 4 weeks of it being in the shop without them coming out to look at the blown engine, they finally came out. The truck was towed in to the dealership and they notified the company of what happened. After numerous calls and attempts to get a hold of the company, they said they would send someone out within the next couple of days. 3 weeks later and after several rounds of phone calls, they finally got someone out to look at it. The warranty we purchased was supposed to cover everything.

    They requested maintenance records, which were submitted. They said that the water pump failed causing the truck to overheat. But they always have a way of getting out of paying. They said they would pay for the water pump but not the blown engine because they said he drove with it overheating. How can you drive it when the whole motor shuts down with no indication? I spoke with several people, including a supervisor and he told me that I was upset because he was not telling me what I wanted to hear. Really??? I spent a lot of money and I just want the truck to be fixed!

    Thanks for your vote!
    Coverage

    Reviewed Aug. 10, 2015

    I spent over $3,000 on their top of the line plan, the high tech plan, and when I had an issue with my truck, which I've only had 3 months, they cited my loopholes and b.s. about why they don't cover that particular part, and I was forced to foot the bill. This warranty is worthless unless your engine dies or transmission fails. Save your money or find a better company.

    Thanks for your vote!
    Customer Service

    Reviewed July 31, 2015

    Customer service is very poor and contacting a person is difficult to resolve issues. Supervisors do not keep word and call you back, as promised. Poor payment policies to servicing dealers causing additional problems. Buy Good Sam's and save headaches.

    Thanks for your vote!
    Customer ServicePunctuality & Speed

    Reviewed July 29, 2015

    Had a vehicle that I purchased stop running. I took it to the nearest garage who told me the engine was shot and it looked like a timing belt. They called First Extended people with a diagnosis and told them they would be able to complete the repair. Two days later with no response, they called back to seek approval to work on the car. They were told the car had to be sent to the dealer it was purchased. So, the car was sent there was a copy of the diagnosis. Service Manager from dealership verifies that engine is shot due to non-lubricated reasons, so the warranty for the car should kick in.

    First attempt - denied. First extended requested maintenance records... very limited for a car only driven 27k since purchase. They stated that 3 forms of oil change documents were required... faxed the next morning. 2 days later after 10 calls - denied again. They state that engine needs to be examined internally to proceed with appeal... $300 later and same diagnosis - denied. They state that due to the timing belt failure, proper maintenance was not done. I called to ask for a refund of the warranty since they were clearly in default, they play the prorate game.

    All of their call service center reps are uneducated in automotive knowledge. They do not listen to the advise of trained mechanics. They refuse to handle issues in timely manner. They do not honor warranty commitments. They need training in the English language being they are from Chicago and dealing with Americans, not foreigners.

    Thanks for your vote!
    Coverage

    Reviewed July 24, 2015

    I have a high tech warranty on a 2006 Jeep Liberty that needed a part to be replaced in the back driver's side window. The repair facility said that I needed a "regulator" and replaced the part needed. First Extended will not cover the part because they say, in the contract they cover "motors" for the window. The repair facility said that to buy a "motor" you purchase an assembly called a "regulator" which includes a motor or vise versa. If they had bought a motor, a regulator would have come with it. How ridiculous, and what a way to rip someone off by refusing to agree that a "motor assembly" and a "regulator assembly" are the same thing! Bye First Extended after purchasing two warranties from you, and was about ready to purchase another!

    Thanks for your vote!
    CoverageSales & MarketingPrice

    Reviewed June 24, 2015

    I purchased a vehicle less than 8 months ago, and have put 10,000 miles on my vehicle. The odometer is currently at 46,000 miles. I have a leaking thermostat housing and a leaking radiator. They are refusing to cover the cost of the radiator. The average life span of a radiator is 125,000 miles, and yet I have been told that my radiator must be faulty. My concern is that I bought this vehicle from a reputable dealership, and they told me to speak to the dealership. Had I known that this extended warranty was just a scam, and really does not cover bumper to bumper as I was told, I would have never purchased it. I own a 2013 Jeep Wrangler.

    Thanks for your vote!
    Verified purchase
    Customer ServiceCoverageTechPricePunctuality & Speed

    Reviewed June 2, 2015

    Sunday 5/10/ 2015 our 2011 VW Tiguan broke the timing chain in our driveway. I then read our contract from First Extended Service Corp. It said "if your car is within 40 miles of selling dealer you must deliver vehicle to the selling dealer". We live 57 miles from that dealer. So I had the car towed to the closer dealer (closer to me). They checked the vehicle said "yes, it is the timing chain" and "yes, we would be glad to call your warranty co". Warranty co says "yes, that is a covered repair but because you are within 40 miles of selling dealer we won't pay for repair".

    "Ok." So I call First Extended and got nowhere not rude or anything just a very thick brick wall. "All right tow the car to the selling dealer so the repair will be covered". This is 5/13 car arrives next morning dealer says "No appt. We will get to it asap and credit to them". They got it in next afternoon. 5/18 dealer calls us says he needs to get adjuster out from warranty co to sign off on repair. It's going to take two days for adjuster to show up (he later told us adj was there that day for other vehicle but would not look at ours without appt). Long story (well not so) short they did pay for repair.

    When we got the car back found out the rental car we had for three weeks would only be covered for one day because the actual repair only took 9 hours. Every attempt to reason with this company was met with an absolute unwillingness to bend or absorb any of our rental costs. I got the very distinct impression that since we had already paid for the warranty we were the last people they wanted to hear from. This was the most frustrating lack of customer service I have ever had the misfortune to deal with. If you are considering a extended warranty please read the fine print very very carefully. The loan officer/finance person is trying to sell you something very expensive, ask to read the contract.

    Thanks for your vote!
    Coverage

    Reviewed April 8, 2015

    Paid 7000.00 for a policy to First Extended. According to First Extended, they did not have a policy with Me or My RV! I bought a brand new Coach last year from McMahon’s RV Dealership and never had anything corrected with them, and they went under. And when I tried to get some work done, I found out that they did not have a policy. My suggestion to other prospective buyers is not to purchase any extra coverage because they all seem to be lacking some sort of integrity! This may have not been caused by First Extended but something about all the other stories depict a less than honorable service! I have other stories with other extended policies that were never fulfilled in their service agreements and it almost seems as if they are all connected to the same moral character!

    Thanks for your vote!
    Customer ServiceTechPunctuality & Speed

    Reviewed Nov. 29, 2014

    We purchased a motor home and an extended warranty contract through First Extended Service Corporation from McMahon's RV in Palm Desert, California in April 2013. We sold the motor home in October 2014 and have tried to cancel the contract. According to the contract, the dealer from whom we purchased the motor home will cancel the contract after I write a letter to the dealer requesting same. Unfortunately the dealer is now out of business and in bankruptcy.

    I called First Extended Service Corporation to explain that I had sold the motor home and that I wished to cancel the service contract and that the dealer through which we purchased the contract was in bankruptcy. I was told by representative Beverly, they were aware of same and that if I submitted by facsimile - attention to Beverly - a letter requesting cancellation, a copy of First Extended Contract, information from purchasing dealer regarding mileage on motor home at time of sale, copy of trade/sale receipt from purchasing dealer and copy of retail installment sale contract from McMahon's RV, a check for the pro rata amount of the contract based on mileage at time or sale or number of months elapsed on the contract would be sent to me with a letter explaining what to do if the amount did not match my calculations. The requested information was sent by facsimile on 10/24/2014. It has been a month since I sent the requested items to First Extended Service Corporation and have not received any communication from First Extended, let alone a check.

    On 11/21/2014 through the First Extended Service Corporation website, I sent an email requesting status of my request for cancellation. I received a return email stating that a representative would be contacting me within a few days. It is now a week later and I have not received any communication from First Extended.

    Thanks for your vote!
    Customer ServiceTechPricePunctuality & Speed

    Reviewed Sept. 25, 2014

    On July 2, 2014 my husband's car over-heated. After having the car towed to our mechanic to be looked at we were told by First Extended Service (FES) it must be taken to the dealership we bought it at (Car Vision). After a few weeks, yes weeks, of back and forth and submitting every oil change receipt etc we were told yes, the head-casket would be covered. A few weeks later, yes weeks, the car was still sitting at Car Vision because they did not have the tools to fix the car. After battling with FES we were told the repairs could be sub-leased. It's now September 25th, and we are still waiting for payment on the repairs.

    This has been the most expensive, stressful, and long few months. My husband is on the phone with Car Vision and/or FES almost every other day. In addition to continuing to make car payments, pay for towing, insurance, and a rental car repeatedly we have spent a fortune on a car we haven't used for almost (3) months. Please beware of both Car Vision and First Extended Service.

    Thanks for your vote!
    CoverageTechPrice

    Reviewed Aug. 6, 2014

    Had heater hose fitting on heater core, broke off. Made it to chev dealer, They called First Extended Service Corporation. I have 2011 GMC canyon 4x4 with 62000 miles. They said Part not covered, It cost me 300.00 to fix. I paid 4,500 For This. Truck over Heated - Still Runs. No Thanks To Them.

    Thanks for your vote!
    Coverage

    Reviewed July 11, 2014

    Bought coverage based on guidance by dealer employees. Coverage was implied to cover everyday dings and dents in car to keep it looking new. Car had two small dents and a scratch on driver's side, typical parking lot type of damage. Repair was either not covered or poorly done.

    Thanks for your vote!
    CoverageTech

    Reviewed July 5, 2014

    I bought a 2005 Acura TL in April 2013. I had just returned from a trip and my 98 Integra had the check engine light come on. When I took it to the Hertrich's of New Castle, DE, it died. So I had to buy a new car. After hours not searching I found the TL. The finance rep goes through the very thing and sells me what he says is a "bumper to bumper" warranty 3 years/36k miles. Be secure knowing if something big goes wrong you're covered. This is $2100 and financed with the loan. Note: I have taken my Acuras to this dealer for 13 years and have had no reason not to trust the people there.

    Well flash forward to June 2014. I take my TL in for a regular A13 service. This is an oil change, flush the trans fluid and replace rotate tires. Nothing serious. 45 minutes after I leave, the check engine light comes on, the VSA light comes on and I lose power. I immediately call the service dept and they say bring it to them in the morning. Turns out the throttle sensor is off. They turn it on. My husband gets home with the car and the same thing happens. So back again. I have already had the car at the dealer in the past and found that this warranty of which I got nothing but a card. No literature no information whatsoever does not cover the inside panel where the material is coming off - that is considered trim. It also doesn't cover the door seal that keeps the door nicely closed either. Apparently Door seals are also trim. It didn't cover the sunroof rattle that was so loud either. Hmm, seeing a pattern here on a "bumper to bumper" warranty.

    So now we find out that we need a throttle casing and housing, sensor, etc. to the tune of $1100 worth of work. The service guy also says he took the liberty of calling the warranty company and GUESS WHAT! The warranty does cover this either and, to top it off, the finance dept had put the sale thru as a powertrain base warranty. They get that fixed and the warranty "top of the line" now still does not covers the work. What peace of mind did I get? Nada. Is the dealer going to cover the "bumper to bumper" warranty? Nope because the GM says there was nothing in writing calling it that. They have offered to buy back my warranty. And I discovered at only 1/3rd of what I will pay over the lifetime of the loan. Do not buy this warranty. This company is only out to make money and not give consumers the peace of mind a warranty should provide. I have warranties through other companies and never have I had a bad experience until now.

    Thanks for your vote!
    Customer ServiceCoverage

    Reviewed June 16, 2014

    My husband purchased an extended warranty with his Dodge Ram in 2010. We were driving home a week or so ago and the truck jerked and started making a noise. We pulled off the interstate to a side road and got out to look and see if we could tell what was wrong. We could smell smoke. We had to call a tow truck to pick up his truck. The dealership looked at it and said the plug on the tank that held the differential fluid had come off and all the fluid leaked out. The rear end was going to have to be rebuilt. We looked on the warranty information and show that it was a covered component according to the warranty information we had. So, the dealership called First Extended and they sent an inspector out. He said that the plug had gone up into the tank which caused all the fluid to leak out. BUT, get this. The rear end is covered BUT THE PLUG IS NOT! That is the most freaking ridiculous thing I've ever heard! How can it not be covered, it's part of the rear end! I can't speak about all warranty companies but I can tell you that First Extended sucks eggs! Do not do business with this company. You will regret it and it will end up costing you a lot of money.

    Thanks for your vote!
    CoverageRefunds & Payouts

    Reviewed June 16, 2014

    We bought a new 2012 Ford F150 which now has 37,000 miles. The truck is leaking in front windshield where you can literally place up to knuckle in the hole. Whole front seat was wet after bad storm and sure this will cause electrical issues and mold in the truck. Marshal Mize Ford stated that warranty company will not cover the seal. Have never had to use warranty and need to know if we can get a refund.

    Thanks for your vote!
    CoverageTech

    Reviewed April 29, 2014

    I bought my 07 Chrysler 300 in 07 from Brennan Dodge in Ruston, LA. I also paid $2985.00 for a Comprehensive Coverage Warranty from First Extended Service. In 2011, a fan blade broke. Took to dealer and warranty covered, no problem. Four days ago (2014), needed tire rod and sensors. Service manager, Alex at Brennan called FES for coverage and my car is fixed and ready for pick up. I have read so many bad things about FES service but when I spoke with a rep, he was patient, courteous and professional. If Alex had a problem about my coverage with FES, I am not aware of it. I give all thanks to God for taking care of my car.

    Thanks for your vote!
    Customer ServiceCoverageTechSales & Marketing

    Reviewed Feb. 26, 2014

    I had to create an account on here for the sole reason that this "company" is one giant scam. I bought a used Volkswagen and I bought the highest level coverage package that they sell for warranties thinking that was a good idea. My car ends up needing some work done on the control arms and while it is in, the mechanics find some issues with the engine. What does FE tell the dealership to do? Ignore it. Well, after jumping through many hoops and probably a dozen plus phone calls later, I end up having to spend almost $1300 because all of the stuff that needs to be replaced (that IS covered by the warranty mind you) is avoided by the warranty company. No matter what I ask or who I talk to, I get the same "This is basic preventative maintenance so we don't cover it" or "You didn't initially complain about this being a problem so we won't cover it since you didn't complain about it."

    This company has been nothing, but a pain and a stress inducer from the start. You would be better off not buying a warranty on a car than you would be getting one from this company, because it will all come out of your own pocket either way. They are an absolute joke and should be avoided at all costs.

    Thanks for your vote!
    Tech

    Reviewed Feb. 8, 2014

    The left front hub on my 2010 GMC Canyon needed replacement. They jerked the dealer around & myself, they did want to use dealer parts. They wanted to use after market parts that they would ship from California. This went on for 2 days. l said okay, then after all their crap they could not get part and finally told dealer to use their parts.

    Thanks for your vote!
    Tech

    Reviewed Dec. 15, 2013

    I haven't used my "First Extended Warranty" benefits, but after reading all of the negative comments it seems useless to even try. I didn't even get the choice to sign up because the financial car dealership guy made it seem it was all a part of the car package. I just happened to notice the card I was given, but now it seems like I've been had before I can even use it. I'm getting upset just looking at all of the negative comments that tell me and anyone else who has it that these people are worthless and seems like a class action lawsuit waiting to happen. I'm going to take my car in this coming Saturday for brakes in the front, so tune in as I'll be sure to share my experience.

    Thanks for your vote!
    Profile pic of the author.

    Reviewed Oct. 22, 2013

    Bought a policy from this company for six years or 60,000 miles, paid $4368 for. Hardly used it just for little stuff until this weekend when my air conditioning went out in the motorhome. Knowing that I had to get into the shop... But my daughter came down sick, she had to be watched. After we got things going again, I went to the dealer to have it fixed. They said I was 21 days over my expiration date for this policy and nothing can be done. Can you believe these people? Won't tell my daughter though, she doesn't need to know.

    Thanks for your vote!

    Reviewed Oct. 8, 2013

    I have a 2007 Toyota Tundra 4x4. I bought the extended warranty. It was making noise in the ball joints and tie rods on the suspension. I brought it to Marin Toyota, they confirmed the problem. First Extended came out and looked at it and denied it saying there was excessive off-roading. I live in San Francisco and it has never been off-road... at all. I have a month left on the warranty. I would NEVER EVER RECOMMEND this company... What a RIP-OFF. PLEASE DON'T BUY THIS WARRANTY... BAD PEOPLE.

    Thanks for your vote!
    CoverageRefunds & Payouts

    Reviewed Aug. 20, 2013

    Ben ** is a good man. I bought an F-450, started having problems immediately. I purchased a warranty, I thought I was good. Ben said I was covered, I live in Greer, SC so I carried it to D&D Ford. D&D told me it was not covered, cost $560.00 to repair. My advice is don't buy the warranty. The warranty is sold by First Extended Service Corporation. The problem was a sensor in the exhaust, they said it was due to carbon build up. Would not cover going to get my money back.

    Thanks for your vote!
    Customer ServiceCoverageTechRefunds & Payouts

    Reviewed Aug. 4, 2013

    I have a 2011 WRX which I took in for the first warranty use of the $1598 extended warranty purchased. My car had a rack and pinion power steering leak covered through the warranty. It was new to me to hear that Re Manufactured parts would be used to replace my OEM material. So since it was in contract I went with it, but one thing about this company is that they use a third party parts manufacture to send parts which are quote to be shipped over night. The part took 4 days and to make it worse the part was bad. The rack they sent was just as bad as my OEM that had the leak.

    So again, I end up having to leave the car and the service manager recontacted First Extended to let them know of the issue at hand and they on point talked with the tech to verify and said the part would be sent within 24 hours. Me being the understanding person gave it a cushion of 48 hrs for delivery (mind you that this whole time the car is not in my hands and thus having to have more money come out of pocket for rentals cost).

    I came by 3 days later from the date of being notified of the leak and update with first extended to find that the part has yet to be delivered. On top of that, the Service manager has tried responding to voice mails being left by a representative of Meridian (their parts provider) and First Extended and had problems contacting them. I then found the number of Meridian and contacted them myself and ended finally getting someone on hand which had no idea of why it has not been sent out. When reading the notes to the service manager, they said they needed to speak with the mechanic again (which they have already). This all happened on a Friday thus now having to wait till Monday for the part to be delivered thus according to the overnight delivery clause will be there by Tuesday.

    Hoping the part is good when it gets here (which I hope it is) I would have had nearly a month without the car due to the issue (eleven though in contract) of the option of them choosing what saves them money instead of the rack and pinion from Subaru which they have on hand at the dealership. On top of not having the car, I am now paying an extra bill to cover rental costs as well as taking time out of work and school just to go to the dealership. All they have to say for themselves is that it’s not their fault, but as a business, it’s their goal to provide the service that was paid for as well as maintaining customer satisfaction but they fail at both. Not to mention not keeping a tally with the companies they deal with. I do not recommend this program to anyone as well as to dealerships.

    Thanks for your vote!
    CoverageTechPunctuality & Speed

    Reviewed July 10, 2013

    Prestige Chrysler-Dodge in Longmont, CO "threw in" a free extended warranty for my 2009 Jeep Compass. That obviously made up my mind as to whether I would buy the car or not. The car had 49K miles on in when I bought it in December of 2010. In May of 2013, I noticed a loud vibrating sound and my RPMs would rev very high while I was driving. My warranty only had 10K or 18 months left so I knew I needed to get it in immediately. I took the vehicle back to the dealership and told them that I thought my transmission was going out. There were 84K miles on the car now. They told me that it was my alternator and that it wasn't covered under my Powertrain Extended warranty. I paid them $700 to have it fixed.

    On June 9th, I drove 6-1/2 hours to Dodge City, KS to take my daughter to orientation at the College she will be attending in the fall. On the way home, in the middle of nowhere in Colorado, my car went from 80 miles an hour to 40 miles an hour in a matter of minutes. The RPMs revved all the way to 6000, the car overheated and then shut down. The overheat symbol I got said it was a transmission fluid overheat (according to my Jeep Handbook). I waited 30 minutes and let the car cool down and drove 2-1/2 hours in 104 degree heat back to Longmont, CO with no air conditioning. I took the Jeep immediately to the dealership for them to take a look at it. When they put my Jeep on the computer, they got a transmission line pressure code. The dealership then asked me to pay $500 to flush and clean out my transmission in which case I said no and got a second opinion from a local transmission shop. According to the transmission specialist, the line pressure code is a transmission malfunction code and I needed a new one.

    I called the dealership and asked the service manager to go to bat for me with the warranty company for a new transmission. After keeping my car for a week, the dealership said the warranty company would replace my tranny; all they needed was proof that I had done a 60K mile tune up on my car. What tune up? No one ever told me I needed a 60K mile check up. The dealer then reported this to the warranty company and they refused to replace it. I then got my father involved who managed to get the dealership to go back to the warranty company again until I was given a new transmission. The warranty company sent an inspector out and my dealership wanted me to pay $700 to remove the transmission so they could take a look inside and if the warranty company refused to pay, I would be responsible for that charge. I, of course, refused and they took the car apart anyways.

    The warranty company decided that all they would do is replace my transmission with a used transmission. The dealer offered to give me a new one for $800 with a 100,000-mile extended warranty on it. What? Really, I don't think so! In the end and a month later, I ended up with a used transmission from a junk yard. The warranty company charged me my $100 deductible and $200 to flush and clean the used tranny. Never Ever purchase an extended warranty from this company. They will screw around as long as they can so that your warranty runs out or until you get tired of fighting and just give up. I would let neither get the best of me. I traded the Jeep in the day it came out of the shop because after they put the used transmission in it, the Jeep started vibrating on the way home.

    Thanks for your vote!
    CoveragePunctuality & Speed

    Reviewed May 21, 2013

    First off, as a service advisor, I have dealt with many extended warranty companies and by far, this is the worst I have dealt with. I was placed on hold initially for over 15 minutes and once I was helped, it took an additional 10 minutes just to find out that the part that I was seeking coverage on was not covered by their terms; nowhere on the contract agreement copy that I was handed did it show what parts are excluded or covered. It was a total waste of time. If you are going to spend money for extended warranty, don't give it to these hacks.

    Thanks for your vote!
    Customer ServiceClaims HandlingCoverage

    Reviewed Jan. 11, 2013

    I purchased a warranty from First Extended Service Corp on 10/23/2010 for my 2007 Dodge Ram. I paid $1,650.00 for the high tech with a $50 deductible. It covers my vehicle for 48 months or 48,000 miles. I was having trouble with my front end, so I took it to my mechanic. He told me I needed new struts and shocks. I checked my warranty and it states specifically that it covers MacPherson struts, but does not cover shocks. I called the company to find out how to make a claim since the dealership is out of state. They informed me to take it to a mechanic of my choice and to have them contact the company for pre-approval.

    My mechanic called me and told me they denied the claim because the struts are considered shocks. My mechanic explained to them that in fact they are shocks, but the front shocks are struts and it states they are covered under warranty. Then they changed their denial saying that since the struts have inserts, they are not covered. We did not have to replace the strut inserts, just the struts. My mechanic stated he has never worked with a warranty company like this one and suggested I cancel the agreement and get a refund.

    Thanks for your vote!

    Reviewed Dec. 31, 2012

    I bought an extended warranty with First Extended Service Corporation. My engine blew up in my 2007 Trailblazer, which was supposed to be under warranty. Now they are saying that this warranty was just a wrap warranty. I've never heard of a wrap warranty. They are refusing to fix my Trailblazer.

    Thanks for your vote!

    Reviewed Aug. 15, 2012

    I purchased a warranty with First Extended Service Corp. in 2007 when I bought my car. It appeared that the timing chain broke in my car. First Extended was called. Mr. ** said no problem. He told us what to do and that we had filed a claim. There was much more damage done to my engine, bent valves and pistons. Mr. **/First Extended was called to inform them. Do I rebuild the engine or get a rebuilt one? He said take the car and get it fixed and send them the paid bill. I got it fixed as cheaply as I could. All I got back was a denial letter, said I didn't have prior authorization. This will not end here. This is not right.

    Thanks for your vote!
    CoverageTech

    Reviewed Aug. 9, 2012

    2010 VW Beetle ignition switch and the dealership is also saying steering lock is broken and they will not cover it. An ignition switch is not manual switch because a key is in it even though we were told it was a bumper to bumper policy. Vague language will let them get out of anything. I was told even the brake light switch is not covered; it is mechanical in operation and if that is true, all switches have something to go through before it activates.

    Thanks for your vote!
    Customer ServiceCoverage

    Reviewed April 6, 2012

    We bought a service contract for $2,423.00, on a 2006 Ford F250, brand new off the lot. We had 51,510 miles on the truck and the EGR Cooler went out. In order to fix that, the system needs to be flushed because now it is contaminated - it is contaminated because the "Covered" part broke. They are willing to pay for the EGR cooler, but they refuse to pay for the flush at $700.00. I spoke with Michael ** and all he kept repeating was "It is not covered, because of the way the contract is written. It is the language of the contract." And when I got upset and told him his company was nothing more than a bunch of scam artist, he said he needed to end the call and hung up!

    Thanks for your vote!
    Customer Service

    Reviewed Feb. 28, 2012

    I recently had to contact First Extended Service to have my 2004 Ford Expedition repaired. After waiting for days to get approval to have the defective transmission replaced, they decided it was cheaper to have a used transmission installed than to have the current transmission repaired by Ford. They advised me I could pay out of pocket the difference in using a used transmission rather than rebuilding the existing transmission by the OEM. When on the phone, I asked multiple times to talk to a supervisor, who was in the background saying they would not talk to me about the issue unless I had a copy of the contract, which I never received. This is not the end of this. I plan to go through everything on the vehicle and have everything that is having a problem replaced "under warranty".

    Thanks for your vote!
    Customer ServiceCoverageTechSales & Marketing

    Reviewed Nov. 9, 2011

    I purchased my First Extended Warranty from Carman Dogdge in New Castle, De. in February of 2009. We have a 2009 Chrysler Mini Van. At the time of purchase, it was made to believe that these were the best people to deal with and the extra money spent would be well worth it.

    Fast forward to November 7, 2011, I was driving home with all three children and the win module (which was the diagnosed problem) failed and caused me to loose power/electric in my car. I had to leave the car overnight at the dealership and get a rent a car from Enterprise. I was called the next morning by the dealership with the diagnosis and that my rent car would be covered and problem would be covered just had to pay my deductible. Later that day, I get another phone call from the dealership that they will not cover my rent a car because I did not meet the requirements for rental car allowance. In there contract it states "...a covered repair exceeds a minimum of 4 hours of labor." Well, my labor took exactly 4 hours but because of their horrible wording they will not cover it. I was told that if it took 4.1 hours which breaks down to 1/10 of and hour which is 6 minutes so if it took 4 hours and 6 minutes they would have covered it. This is ridiculous and a scam!

    Thanks for your vote!
    Claims HandlingCoverageTechPrice

    Reviewed Sept. 13, 2011

    We bought a 2007 BMW 525i brand new and it has around 65,000 miles on it. We bought an extended coverage from ORR BMW in Shreveport in 10/2010. Last week, when I was driving to work, engine overheated alert came. We stopped the car and got it towed to Russel BMW. The dealer told us that the engine needs to be replaced and it will cost us $12,000. He also told us the coolant was broken, water tank was broken and they could not figure out the sequence of the events occurred. So they filed the claim with First Extended Service Corp. and a private investigator came to look at the car. We heard now that they rejected the claim because they think it is the bolt of the coolant that caused the issue and since the bolt is not covered, coolant is not covered, water tank is not covered and engine is not covered.

    Thanks for your vote!

    Reviewed Aug. 19, 2011

    On August 21, 2006, my husband and I purchased a 2006 Dodge Ram Truck with the extended warranty. On 5/16/11, when we needed to use the warranty for steering linkage problems, we were told that the warranty only covered linkages. I believe First Extended Service Corporation is splitting hairs with terminology and ignoring actual function of part to deny coverage.

    Thanks for your vote!

    Reviewed Aug. 2, 2011

    I purchased a "certified" 2004 VW Passat with less than 30,000 miles. I also purchased the extended warranty that Berlin City Nissan of South Portland, Maine suggested to me. I was told it was "the best warranty you could have".

    So, I built it into my loan payment and welcomed the piece of mind it gave me, only to find they are nothing but a bunch of con artists. Finding every way to deny the front end issues, I had less than 5,000 miles of driving it. I took it into the dealership who told me that "they are not set up with the computer equipment to perform diagnostic tests to determine why the engine light stays on."

    Meanwhile, the damage continued as I took it to other dealerships who could. But I found out that they could not fix the car because the warranty would only work at Berlin City! The service department said "they didn't have the equipment!"

    Meanwhile, First Extended Service Corp. denied the work all together.

    Thanks for your vote!

    Reviewed July 18, 2011

    I bought a warranty that doesn't want to fix my vehicle. I had a family reunion on 6-11-11 up in northern California I was driving and stop at a gas station and when I when to start my vehicle it didn't start.broke down. I towed it to the dealer and since I bought extended warranty I'm thinking everything ok well no now they don't want to cover the engine which is the problem.they are blaming the over size wheels but that is the way I bought the vehicle.

    Thanks for your vote!

    Reviewed Sept. 3, 2010

    I have a 2006 Nissan Xterra and I had it towed to a certified Nissan Dealership in Fairfield, CA. The Service department told me that the radiator had failed and needed to be replaced with a full flush once it is replaced. The Nissan service department contacted the agency in question about the failure. I contacted the Nissan dealer and was informed that First Extended Service Cooperation would replace the radiator but would not pay services for the flush. Without a flush, the transmission will eventually fail and possibly the motor too since the fluids have transferred locations in the system. I then contacted the First Extended Service Cooperation about the situation and informed them that without the flush, they would soon be replacing a transmission and possibly a motor. The outcome I got from that was they wanted the system flushed before replacing the radiator, which was already diagnosed as a failure and they reduced their payment to the Nissan dealer from $750 to $500.

    So I am expecting that by law, they have to save all phone calls on recording between them and the dealer and between them and myself which I plan to use against them in small claims court. With what a professional certified mechanic told me, they said and with what they said to me, I find false accusations from a party involved other than myself. I am expecting the vehicle to be fully fixed like it should have. I also expect to be paid for the time lost from work with interest. On 09/01/2010 at 08:30AM, I was told by First Extended Service Cooperation that a decision would be made on the repairs of my vehicle within 24 hours, "possibly longer". On 09/02/2010 at about 12:00PM, when I called back First Extended Service Cooperation, they verbally informed me that they are requesting an extra flush on the mechanical system without the new radiator to prove that the old one was broken which that cost I hold them responsible for.

    I plan to prove in the court of law that this agency will do what it can to not provide a proper service to its customers. This company has clearly proven to me that they use the fine print in their warranty against me and try to make the mechanics look bad while they do it. Unfortunately, I am 34 years old and my father started teaching me at 9 about vehicle maintenance and repairs. First Extended Service Cooperation has made bad decisions and wasted precious time at my cost, pain and suffering.

    Thanks for your vote!

    Reviewed July 7, 2010

    The door locks were not working and I took my truck to a dealer other than the dealer listed on the agreement (the dealer on the agreement is no longer in business due to bankruptcy). The dealer called the service corporation and they would not take a claim from the dealership. The telephone agency stated to the dealer that the customer would have to pay up front for the service and sent the claim in for payment. The repairs were made with the understanding that I would be reimbursed for the repairs.

    First Extended Service Corporation did not even have the decency to notify me that they did not authorize the repairs and refused to pay the claim for $984. I have talked to 4 individuals at the First Extended Service Corporation and I received the same answer that they did not give the dealership an authorization number. As a consumer, we trust that the organizations will hold up to their part of the agreement but that is not always the case. I could have gone without having the locks repaired but I was under the assumption that I would be out the $100 deductible. Times are too hard for people to assume that they have coverage and it falls back in their laps.

    Thanks for your vote!

    Reviewed Feb. 28, 2010

    I purchased a Powertrain warranty from First Extended for $2200. My truck started running rough in the mornings until it warmed up and had failed emissions test. I called them and they told me to take it to Precision Auto & Transmission in Tucson. I took it there and left it. They called me later and said that it was just because of lack of proper maintenance and First Extended has denied any payment. I went and picked up the vehicle and was told that it needed a tune up with new Spark plugs and wires, a coil connector wire harness, EGR service, injectors flushed and an air filter. They had done this diagnosis all out in the parking lot and charged me $85.00 for it. Being a former auto mechanic, I knew these guys were giving me a big line so I took it an auto shop I knew and trusted. Their diagnosis was a leaking intake manifold gasket. I had them replace it and it runs like new. I called First Extended for reimbursement and they denied any reimbursement.

    Thanks for your vote!

    Reviewed Dec. 29, 2009

    I bought a power train warranty for $1,336.00 on Dec. 7, 2008, when I bought my 2005 Pontiac Aztek. The contract number is **. I brought the vehicle to Certified Transmission in Patchogue, NY for repairs on the transmission on Dec. 21, 2009. The shop began diagnosis and contacted First Extended to file the claim. The owner of Certified Trans has been calling First Extended every day (save for the Christmas holiday) and has yet to have the repairs approved by First Extended. He keeps on being told that it is being reviewed. Today I personally called and spoke to Anthony at First Extended (12/29/2009 12:30PM EST) and he told me the guy who was reviewing the claim was out on lunch. I told Anthony that I needed an answer within the next 2 hours. It is now 5PM EST and they have not called me or Certified Trans. I have been without a car for over a week, waiting for First Extended to approve my claim. The warranty explicitly states that the transmission and internal parts are covered by the warranty. What is there to debate?

    Thanks for your vote!

    Reviewed Nov. 25, 2009

    On November 18, 2007 my wife and I bought a 2002 Chevy Blazer and purchased the First Future 2 year/24K mile extended service agreement for $1,695. The coverage of the First Extended Service Corp extended service agreement was in effect 11/18/07 though 11/18/09. In late October 2009, I noticed that the car had a rough idle in the mornings, but ran fine once the car warmed up. When the ‘check engine’ light came on, I promptly took it to my local mechanic at Express Tire on 10/29/09. This visit documents that the problem with the car developed well within the 2 year coverage agreement.
    The mechanic suspected a vacuum leak so the problem was thought to be a minor. I returned to Express Tire on 11/03/09 as the car’s idle progressively became worse in the morning. The mechanic performed several maintenance items that he thought would help; Oil conditioner, fuel injector cleaner, combustion chamber cleaner and throttle body cleaner. He informed me that it could take up to 2 weeks before I would see any difference. After two weeks without improvement, I returned the car to Express Tire on 11/21/09 for further diagnosis. At that time they discovered it was not a “simple fix.” The car failed the block test and the problem was identified as a bad head gasket – three days after the extended service agreement ended. After returning home, the car has not been driven since for fear of further damage. The car has since been towed to be repaired at an engine shop. The following Monday after the diagnosis, 11/23/09, I contacted First Extended Service Corp and the Customer Service Rep denied my claim, as it was reported after the term of the agreement. I asked to speak with his supervisor, Mike Green. Mr. Green stated that he understood my situation and asked that I fax the supporting documentation to him for review. On 11/24/09 I followed up with Mr. Green and was informed that my claim was still denied since there was “too much of a lag time” between my second and third visit to my local mechanic, (visits on 11/03/09 and 11/21/09). I made a second appeal and spoke with Mike Nolan the claims manager and was also denied coverage. Since I purchased a two year extended warranty, I would expect that the car would be under warranty for the full two years and any problem that is documented within that time would be covered. The service agreement does not mention that a claim need to be filed with in the two year window, only that the car is covered for 24 months from the date of sale. The problem was evident and documented well within that dates of coverage.
    Thanks for your vote!

    Reviewed March 10, 2009

    Over 2 months ago I cancelled my extended warranty with this company and they keep saying that they are sending my refund in the mail. Each time I call to let them know that I still have not received anything they give me a different reason as to why my refund is being held up. I spoke to them again today, 3/10/09, and they said that they needed my address. They claim that is the reason for them not sending out my check this week as promised. I am getting no where with this.
    Thanks for your vote!

    Reviewed Dec. 31, 2008

    First Extended Service Corp. will not pay for the covered warranty issue on my truck. They will not approve of the repair the way the Ford dealership service dept. says it needs to be repaired. First Extended Service Corp. will only approve the repair to be done their way, which is 1/4 the cost, can not even be done and if it was possible, has a high probability of damaging the engine, which First Extended Service Corp. is aware of, but says only a few come back with damaged engines. Because of this, the Ford service dept. will not do a cheap faulty job that they will be responsible for replacing the engine later. First Extended Service Corp. tells me to take my truck to a repair shop that needs to pay their bills and has a family to feed.
    Thanks for your vote!
    Loading more reviews...

    Assurant Vehicle Service Contracts Company Information

    Company Name:
    Assurant Vehicle Care
    Formerly Named:
    First Extended Service Corporation
    Country:
    United States
    Website:
    vehiclecareplan.com