NEWS    RECALLS    COMPLAINT FORM    SCAM ALERTS   RESOURCES  
Small Claims Guide   Class Actions   Lemon Laws   FAQ   Newsletters  
Bookmark and Share


Complain about a product or service

Automotive    Education    Employment    Electronics    Family    Finance    Health    Homeowners    Insurance    Pets    Shopping    Travel     Print This     Email This    



NEWS   Latest |  Archives |  Auto |  Cells, etc. |  Computers |  Financial |  Health |  Homeowners |  Parents |  Privacy |  Scams |  Seniors |  Travel

FCC Not Ready to Pry Open Wireless Networks

But agency warns carriers its plans could change





By Martin H. Bosworth
ConsumerAffairs.com

January 23, 2008 


How to Avoid Early Termination Fees
Site Offers Cell Phone Contract Swapping
---
News
Google Cuts Nexus One Cancellation Fee
FCC Questions Telcos, Google on Early Termination Fees
FCC Wants More Answers On Verizon Termination Fees
4 Ways To Avoid Costly Cell Phone Fees
GAO: FCC Needs to Improve Oversight of Wireless Industry
FCC Grills Verizon Over Termination Fee Hike
Verizon Wireless To Increase Termination Fees to $350
Verizon Wireless Revamps "Exclusive" Handset Deals
Sprint Text Messaging Tax Suit Dropped
Senate Committee Investigates Cell Phone Contracts
Senate Committee To Investigate Cell Phone Contracts
Judge Rules Sprint Termination Fees are Illegal
Verizon Pays $21 Million to Settle Termination Fee Lawsuit
Washington Power Grab May Be Price of Lower Cell Phone Termination Fees
U.S. Cellular Settles 'Free' Phone Complaint
Cell Phone Industry Losing Its Treasured Arbitration Clauses
Wireless Firms Face Pressure On Termination Fees
Verizon, FCC Cook Up Termination-Fee Plan
FCC Not Ready to Pry Open Wireless Networks
Sprint Removes Three Fees, Adds Two New Ones
Sprint, T-Mobile Prorate Termination Fees
AT&T Changes Contract Policy
California Supreme Court OKs T-Mobile Class Action
Verizon Wireless Changes Contract Policy
FCC, Congress May Limit Cable, Cell Phone Termination Fees
Cell Phone Consumers Win Court Victory
Text Messaging Charges Surprise Cell Phone Users
Cell Phone Customers Held Captive by Termination Fees
Poll Finds Cell Phone Users Want Stronger Consumer Protection
Michigan Challenges One-Sided Cell Phone Contracts
New York Considers Tough Cell Phone Consumer Protection Law
California to Try Again With Telecommunications Bill of Rights
California Suspends Wireless Bill of Rights
California Adopts Wireless Consumer Bill of Rights

Federal Communications Commissioner Michael Copps doesn't favor using regulation to force wireless companies to open their networks for use by all phones or devices, preferring to let the industry's "voluntary initiatives" drive adoption of new standards forward, he told a think thank audience this week.

"We've seen with Wi-Fi, for example, that enlightened FCC spectrum policies and industry-led product development can deliver enormous benefits to consumers without too much regulation," Copps said. "But I (and I hope others) will certainly be watching carefully to see how the market develops."

Copps made his remarks at the "Free My Phone!" event sponsored by policy think tank The New America Foundation. The "event was convened to discuss the changing face of the wireless marketplace, and whether government regulations are needed to ensure that consumers have choices and protections.

In his speech, Copps mentioned several areas of contention that might give him and other regulators more impetus to act, such as carriers' control over features offered by phones linked to their network.

"As Chairman [Kevin] Martin demonstrated at an FCC open meeting, the European version of a leading manufacturer's popular phone comes with Wi-Fi, yet the identical model here in the U.S. comes without Wi-Fi—simply because the U.S. carrier wanted to protect its business model," Copps said. "How on earth do American consumers benefit when a perfectly good feature is disabled so their carrier can protect its revenue stream?"

Copps also discussed the termination fees that customers have to pay to switch providers, and the limited ability customers have to use their phones of choice on a carrier's network.

"If a carrier charges $50 per month for service...to recover the cost of subsidizing a handset, then I should get a better rate if I bring my own phone. And I shouldn't have to accept an early termination fee, either," Copps said.

Copps compared the current wireless network landscape to the Internet, saying "At home, using my PC, I get to choose between iTunes and Amazon.com, Google Maps and Mapquest, and Flickr and Shutterfly. I should have that same freedom of choice on my wireless handset, too."

The cell shell game

In the face of growing demand from consumers, advocacy groups, and Congress to streamline prices and open networks to customers, the wireless industry has been taking halting steps to meet the issue. All four of the major wireless carriers have agreed to prorate termination fees over the life of a customer contract, and to limit the fees charged for changing plans or service agreements.

Verizon Wireless announced in November that it would open its network to all devices and phones, but would continue to support its proprietary network and applications as well, creating a "two-tier" system for different users.

Sprint and T-Mobile have thrown their support behind Google's Open Handset Alliance, a coalition supporting the development of Google's "Android" open-source operating system for use on mobile phones.

And the FCC itself adopted the principle of "open access" for its upcoming auction of the 700mhz wireless spectrum, mandating that any network which buys the spectrum ensures that it opens access to all devices, regardless of their maker.



Report Your Experience
If you've had a bad experience -- or a good one -- with a consumer product or service, we'd like to hear about it. All complaints are reviewed by class action attorneys and are considered for publication on our site. Knowledge is power! Help spread the word. File your consumer report now.

FREE CONSUMER NEWSLETTERS

The Daily Consumer
Afternoons M-F

Sign up now!


Consumer News & Alerts
Every Sunday

Sign up now!

Follow us on Twitter.





CONSUMER NEWS

SAFETY RECALLS

Back to the top |

Advertisement


Custom Search
AUTOMOTIVE
• Dealers
• Manufacturers
• Service
• Extended Warranties
• Lemon Laws
• Recalls
• Tires
• Transporters

FAMILY
• Aging
• Children, Parenting
• Recalls
• Dating
• Education
• Entertainment
• Pets
• Weddings
FINANCE
• Annuities
• Banks
• Credit Cards
• Debt Collection
• Debt Counseling
• Insurance
• Investing
• Loans
• Mortgages
• Payday Loans
• Student Loans
• Tax Prep

HEALTH
• Doctors
• Drugs, Pharmacies
• Health Clubs
• Hearing Care
• Hospitals
• Nursing Homes
• Nutrition, Diets
• Vision Care
• Weight Loss
HOUSE & HOME
• Appliances
• Cookware
• Furniture
• Home Improvements
• Lawn & Garden
• Movers
• Pools & Spas
• Realtors, Rental Agents
• Recalls
• Utilities

ELECTRONICS
• Cable TV/DBS
• Cameras
• Cell Phones
• Computers
• Home Electronics
• Internet Access
• Local Phone Service
• Long Distance
• VoIP
SHOPPING
• In-Home
• Online
• Retail Stores
• Sporting Goods
• Supermarkets
• Telemarketers

TRAVEL
• Airlines
• Bus Lines
• Car Rental
• Cruises
• Hotels
• Travel Agents
• Trains

RESOURCES
• Class Actions
• Complaint Form
• Small Claims Guide
• Lemon Laws
CONSUMER NEWS
• Latest News
• Automotive
• Telecom
• Financial
• Health
• Homeowners
• Scams
• Seniors
• Travel
• More ...

RECALLS
• Automotive
• Children's Products
• Drugs
• Food
• Household Products
• Sporting Goods

ABOUT US
• FAQ
• Privacy Policy
• Advertise With Us
• Newsroom
• Syndication
• Terms of Use

Terms of Use Your use of this site constitutes acceptance of the Terms of Use

Advertisements on this site are placed and controlled by outside advertising networks. ConsumerAffairs.com does not evaluate or endorse the products and services advertised. See the FAQ for more information.

Company Response Welcome If complaints about your company appear on our site, we welcome your response. Please see the Response Form for more information.

For more information, see the FAQ and privacy policy. The information on this Web site is general in nature and is not intended as a substitute for competent legal advice.  ConsumerAffairs.com Inc. makes no representation as to the accuracy of the information herein provided and assumes no liability for any damages or loss arising from the use thereof. 

Copyright © 2010 ConsumerAffairs.com Inc.  All Rights Reserved.    The contents of this site may not be republished, reprinted, rewritten or recirculated without written permission.