CONSUMER NEWS    RECALLS    COMPLAINT FORM    SCAM ALERTS  


Complain about a product or service

Small Claims Guide | Class Actions | Lemon Law | FAQ | Resources | Newsletters | Spanish
Automotive    Education    Electronics    Family    Finance    Health    Homeowners    Shopping    Travel   
NEWS   Latest |  Archives |  Auto |  Cells, etc. |  Computers |  Financial |  Health |  Homeowners |  Parents |  Privacy |  Scams |  Seniors |  Travel

CARFAX Settles Class Actions

Agrees to Include Prominent Warning that its Reports May Not Be Complete




Advertisement

January 19, 2007

Carfax
Public Citizen Objects to Carfax Settlement
CARFAX: Not Always All the Facts
How Can Used Car Buyers Protect Themselves?
CARFAX Settles Class Action Lawsuits
How To Contact CARFAX
CARFAX History
---
Consumer Complaints
"Unlimited" Service
Inaccurate Reports
Refund Policy
Advertising Claims
Sellers' Complaints

Car buyers who purchased a CARFAX vehicle-history report before Oct. 27, 2006, would be entitled to additional, free reports or other benefits under a proposed settlement of a nationwide class-action lawsuit against the company.

The suit charged that CARFAX misled consumers into believing that its reports contain complete information about vehicle histories. The settlement provides that CARFAX must include a prominent warning in its marketing materials that its reports may not be complete.

Consumers can fill out an online claim form to be included in the settlement. Final court approval of the settlement is scheduled for April 27.

The proposed settlement would conclude nine cases alleging that the the Fairfax, Va., company violated states' consumer-protection laws "by not properly disclosing terms and conditions for, and limitations of, CARFAX Vehicle History Reports," according to a notice mailed to customers.

Under the terms of the proposed settlement, consumers who bought CARFAX reports could get free or reduced-price CARFAX reports or they could choose to have CARFAX pay part of the cost of having cars inspected for signs of past problems.

The settlement covers all former CARFAX customers unless they opt out in writing by March 13. Those who accept the settlement would give up their right to sue CARFAX for past problems.

Kansas attorney Bernard Brown called the settlement "worse than no settlement at all" and said it is little more than a marketing tool for CARFAX. He said claimants should get cash instead of vouchers for additional CARFAX reports.

Other attorneys said the settlement might be the best consumers could hope for, especially since the company is governed by Virginia law, which is very hostile to class actions.

In agreeing to settle the case, CARFAX denied any wrongdoing.

Company "Overstated" Its Capabilities

One of the other attorneys suing the company was David A. McLaughlin of Tennessee. He said the company failed to disclose that it does not access records from more than 20 states, and the information consumers buy is often "incomplete, inaccurate and unreliable."

When he filed his lawsuit, McLaughlin says his investigation revealed that CARFAX overstated what it could do for consumers.

"The problem I had with CARFAX from the very beginning was that it claimed it could tell consumers if a vehicle had been in a major accident," he says. "But CARFAX doesn't say what a major accident is, and few accidents result in titling events (changing or branding the title).

He adds: "If you think of every policing agency, in every county in America, and all the municipalities in the country, and then add them up, how many of those agencies track accidents by vehicle identification numbers (VIN) numbers? How many enter that data into a computer or report it to CARFAX? Some police agencies are still writing reports by hand."

CARFAX acknowledges it only receives police reports from "selected states."

McLaughlin also says CARFAX doesn't receive accident information from insurance companies -- perhaps the biggest data pool of wrecked vehicles.

Would he rely on CARFAX when buying a used car?

"I would never close a deal based on a CARFAX report," he says. "Unless there's been a huge shift in how it gathers its data nationwide, I'd presume it has the same shortcomings it did when we started all this."

McLaughlin's 2003 suit charged that auto dealer Mid-South Motors purchased a 1995 BMW 525i from another wholesaler in 2002 after buying a CARFAX report that showed no "salvage" brands and no police accident or damage disclosure records.

A subsequent check of a database maintained by the National Insurance Crime Bureau (NICB) revealed that the BMW had been declared a "total loss" three separate times after accidents in New York, Florida and Georgia that were reflected in police accident records, according to court documents.



Report Your Experience
If you've had a bad experience -- or a good one -- with a consumer product or service, we'd like to hear about it. All complaints are reviewed by class action attorneys and are considered for publication on our site. Knowledge is power! Help spread the word. File your consumer report now.


Consumer News

May 17 2008

Recent Recalls & Safety Alerts

READER SERVICES

Print, Email & More

Subscribe

Free consumer newsletters
Sign up now!







Back to the top |

Advertisement


Home | Rogues Gallery | Good Guys | Complaint Form | News | Recalls | Search | Video | FAQ |
Consumer Resources | Small Claims Guide | Lemon Law | Newsletter | Contact Us
Advertise With Us | Testimonials | Newsroom | RSS Feeds | Radio | Job Postings




Terms of Use Your use of this site constitutes acceptance of the Terms of Use

Advertisements on this site are placed and controlled by outside advertising networks. ConsumerAffairs.com does not evaluate or endorse the products and services advertised. See the FAQ for more information.

Company Response Welcome If complaints about your company appear on our site, we welcome your response. Please see the Response Form for more information.

For more information, see the FAQ and privacy policy. The information on this Web site is general in nature and is not intended as a substitute for competent legal advice.  ConsumerAffairs.com Inc. makes no representation as to the accuracy of the information herein provided and assumes no liability for any damages or loss arising from the use thereof. 

Copyright © 2003-2008 ConsumerAffairs.com Inc.  All Rights Reserved.