The postman always rings twice? Don't count on it. He may not be ringing at all unless the Postal Service finds a way to survive beyond the next few months, when it faces a series of potential financial calamaties.
The biggest calamity – email – has, of course, already occurred. The only remaining question is not whether the Postal Service fails but how long and ugly its demise will be.
The most immediate problem for USPS is a $5.5 billion payment due this month to the postal workers pension fund. There is no money to make the payment and it appears likely USPS will default.
Beyond that, USPS is in danger of running out of operating funds early next year, thanks to all the first-class mail that's no longer being sent.
USPS likes to remind us that it is the nation's second-biggest “private” employer, after Walmart. But it's about as private as the Defense Department when it comes down to who gets stuck with the bill -- you do -- for the Postal Service's pension payments and other unavoidable liabilities. But then you already knew that, didn't you?
Few friends
While we could be generous and say the Postal Service is a victim of the times, it has also been incredibly slow to face up to its future, or lack of same, and one of its biggest failings has been the miserable way in which it handles customer complaints. Basically, it ignores them … and that's on a good day. ConsumerAffairs.com is awash in complaints from consumers whose complaints have been met with open hostility, followed by stunning inaction.
The result is that in its hour of need, the Postal Service has few friends willing to speak up for it, as a ConsumerAffairs.com analysis of consumer sentiments shows.
We analyzed roughly 83,000 comments about the Postal Service on Facebook, Twitter and other social Web sites, blogs, microblogs and so forth. Using computerized sentiment analysis, we found a dismal net sentiment over the past 12 months, one that seldom rises into positive territory and quickly plunges into an overall negative sentiment of 23% by the end of August, when consumers made 1,100 negative comments and 690 positives.
![]() |
| Blue line shows net sentiment |
To say that consumers are wildly enthusiastic about their mail service and willing to go to great lengths to preserve it would be overstating the case several hundredfold. Consumers are, at best, neutral about the agency and it doesn't appear likely, based on the comments we sampled, that they're likely to mount a campaign to save it at taxpayers' expense.
One of the thousands of Tweets we analyzed came from @illuminatedNO who complained that the USPS tracking system is “awful.”

He and many other consumers complained that the USPS system of tracking is unreliable and imprecise: “They know when it left and when it gets (if it ever does) to the destination. That is not a tracking system. I predict they will be out of business or taken over by a private entity by 2015,” said Mike Funderburk in a Facebook posting.
Competitors
It's not really possible to compare USPS sentiment to its closet competitor, since its closest competitor is the Internet -- specifically, email. However, in the parcel and overnight letter delivery business, United Parcel Service and Federal Express have taken huge bites out of what business the Internet left behind. And although there is no shortage of complaints about lost and damaged shipments, late deliveries and other problems, both companies rank much higher in consumer sentiment than the Postal Service.
We found roughly 12,000 comments about UPS on social media and blogs. Big Brown was in positive territory for most of the 12-month period, peaking at a positive net ranking of 80% in February.
![]() |
| Blue line shows net sentiment |
FedEx's overall trend is a bit more erratic but the total number of comments over the 12-month period was only 1,200, making it difficult to draw any firm conclusions.
![]() |
| Blue line shows net sentiment |
Postal workers
And finally we come to the postal workers, a heavily unionized, politically powerful work force that is quick to remind Congress of how many votes it can turn out and also quick to remind taxpayers – with rather questionable accuracy – that they are supported entirely by purchases from customers, a claim that ignores the monopolistic powers granted to the USPS and the government's readiness to bail out the workers' pensions.
Postal employees are, after all, the Little People we are all quick to say we admire. No one could possibly be against continuing to support the Postal Service in the style to which it has become accustomed, right?
Wrong, according to the 68,000 consumer sentiments we measured over the last year. Net sentiment was a dismal -51% in August and ventured into positive territory for only a brief time in October 2010 before plummeting back into the dungeon of public approbation, as shown in this graph:
![]() |
| Blue line shows net sentiment |
Most of the resentment towards postal workers is reflected in the commonly-held belief that their jobs are not very intellectually or physically challenging but are nevertheless poorly performed, often with a notable lack of pride, accuracy and timeliness, as in this Tweet from @psyborg_007:

Much as we hate to say it, this is the time for that old bromide: it's hard to find anyone willing to say anything good about postal workers, as in this sampling of comments we found around the blogosphere:
Whether fair or not, negative sentiment on this scale will make it difficult for vote-hungry politicians to fashion a generous and speedy bail-out for the postal workers. That's not to say it won't happen but, with the Tea Party crusading against government spending, it will be politically treacherous for elected officials to be seen as lavishing funds on such an unpopular group of workers.
It's easy for those whose jobs seem exceptionally secure to fall into a pattern of ignoring or, worse, responding snappishly to their customers' and patrons' complaints and inquiries. But as history makes all too clear, there is no such thing as exceptional security and dedicating oneself to customer satisfaction and simple human kindness is, at the very least, inexpensive insurance against the unexpected.
---
Sentiment analysis powered by NetBase




Randy L Foreback (Sun, 18 Sep 2011 03:55:57 +0000): There is one thing that has been driving the USPS to insolvency. A provision in the PAEA of 2006 that required the USPS to PREfund FUTURE retiree health benefits. This provision takes $5.5 Billion out of USPS revenue every year. If not for this requirement made by CONGRESS, the USPS would have actually had a profit of around $800 Million over the past 4 years. This $55 Billion fund is meant to ensure the funding for FUTURE retirees for the next 75 years. In essence, USPS is being required to put money aside for people who do not work for USPS yet and some that aren't even born yet. This fund was to be paid in only 10 years. There is no other business or organization anywhere that has to make such payments.
The USPS has also, due to a flaw in the formulas, OVER paid into the two pension funds by over $60 Billion. You can do the math here, and so can Congress. Congress will not talk about these over-payments or pre-funding requirements. They're too busy paying lip service to their constituents about keeping little bitty Post Offices open.
Cut out the PAEA funding and return the over-payments. Then, since there is already $23 Billion in that fund, USPS can take that $60 Billion and put $22 Billion into the future retiree health benefit fund, pay off the debt to the Treasury of $15 Billion and still have some left over for a rainy day.
But this is too simple for Congress to grasp. They, as well as the public, grab onto the Union Contracts as being the bane of the USPS. In specific, the No Lay-off clause. Think about this. When the last agreement expired in November 2010, hiring was frozen. Anyone on the rolls prior to that is protected against being laid off. Once the contract was ratified, hiring resumed. Those newly hired are not covered by the no lay-off clause, Besides, who would be laid off first anyway? That's right, the new people.
Another thing you don't realize in characterizing the Unions as evil money grubbing monsters. The APWU, realizing that we are all in this together gave up some financial issues to help with this problem. Specifically, we will be paying a larger portion towards our health benefits which, contrary to popular belief, were never ever paid in full by the USPS. We also waived any Cost of Living Adjustments for all of 2011. COLA for 2012 is deferred until the same period in 2013. Our first chance of a raise is only if inflation causes the CPI to rise. The first general wage increase will be 1% starting in November 2013. That will make 3 years that APWU represented workers have gone without any raise in salary. Definitely the sign of evil money grubbing monsters. We're feeling the pinch too.
So, NO, it isn't the Unions. The blame lies solely with your CONGRESS. If you really want to do something, contact your representative and senator and urge them to support H.R.1351 which will go very far in resolving the current problem and resolve the over-funding problem.
As far as a bailout, the USPS has repeatedly stated that it is not looking for a bailout and does not want a bailout. Getting to your question of the Union blocking any attempt at restructuring all I can say is, Hogwash. In the latest contract, the APWU agreed to allow the USPS to hire a greater percentage of temporary workers as well as allowing management to post and fill "Non-Traditional" jobs. These jobs could be 4 10 hour days, or 5 6hour days and a 10 hour day or even just 5 6 hour days. Workers only need work a regular schedule of 30 or more hours to be considered full time.
This allows the USPS to fill positions that may not have 8 hours of work every day. It alleviates the problem of having a worker on Stand By for 2 hours every day. I am sure that you have heard about the USPS paying workers to do nothing. Sure doesn't sound like a stonewalling tactic to hold the USPS hostage to a contract.
Also consider that USPS Management agreed to the terms of this contract just a few months ago as something they could live with as well as the APWU.
Darrick Scott-Farnsworth (Sun, 18 Sep 2011 21:13:28 +0000): The reason that the USPS is required to pre-fund the health fund is due to congress knowing that the USPS will not have the cash flow in the near future to pay the bills. As far as the over-payment into the retirement funds that too is a forward looking effort making sure the USPS has enough in the funds to pay for all the retired USPS baby-boomers. Going forward congress needs to calculate how much of the retirement fund money the USPS can afford to take out to use for the needed early-out incentive then the downsizing.
Guy Nohrenberg (Sun, 18 Sep 2011 07:29:53 +0000): It's ok if you don't understand why the Postal Service has been placed into this position. We'll help you. : http://www.facebook.com/media/set/?set=a.1324231705504.50249.1222221820#!/photo.php?fbid=2491903176561&set=a.1324231705504.50249.1222221820&type=1&theater
Thomas Moyers (Sun, 18 Sep 2011 07:38:42 +0000): Hmmm...I guess that since I'm three hours short of a BA in history means that I didn't finish school. How ignorant is Cody Pace's comment on twitter was. I'm sure that a lot of Postal Workers have more education than Cody does.
Tim Korbel (Sun, 18 Sep 2011 14:58:47 +0000): All PAEA is, is a hidden tax.
Steven Ramos (Sun, 18 Sep 2011 22:49:05 +0000): CODY IS a MORON no clue what so ever....
Emily Attanasio (Sun, 18 Sep 2011 23:36:29 +0000): BUSH ADDED this annual 5billion pay.
Michael Bonin (Sun, 18 Sep 2011 23:43:02 +0000): Lets no forget there are other outside forces that are hurting the P.O., gas prices, the crappy economy(thank you Democrates and Repulicans, what a great team you guys/girls make in screwing all Americans) and the fact that no one paid any attention to the PAEA until the damage starting to show in 09-10.
Jim Lambert (Mon, 19 Sep 2011 00:21:26 +0000): yes I'm a letter carrier, some of us have to actually perform manual labor in this economy instead of sitting in front of a computer screen for eight hrs a day. It's sad that actually working gets no respect anymore.
Linda Zwier Miano (Mon, 19 Sep 2011 02:05:54 +0000): Cody, I'm not rude to my customers, nor do I have an "exceptionally secure" position with the Post Office. As with EVERY customer I've spoken to, you are blissfully ignorant of the facts. Not everyone working at USPS has it made. We have too many layers of management, and the craft - the people you see out delivering the mail, work their butts off. I had no idea what the job entailed until I got there, and until you work as a RCA for a year, you don't either. There is no such thing as a "lazy postal worker".
Aleksey Buynovskiy (Mon, 19 Sep 2011 02:30:49 +0000): I don't know how they planning to ask money? I don't want to give a penny for them. Why they ask union? Maybe union can help 'em? USPS pension fond is a problem for USPS, it's not suppose to be our problem. Guys , grow up, nobody will helps You.
Jack Rosenstein (Mon, 19 Sep 2011 10:42:51 +0000): Wha kind of idiot would do research for an article based on tweets? Truth, accuracy, and being unbiased get thrown out with the batwater.
Clayton W. Sawyer (Mon, 19 Sep 2011 12:00:07 +0000): As your pie chart says a "sampling of comments" , it's easy to pick the bad comments to skew perception the way you want it.
Bradley Dale (Mon, 19 Sep 2011 19:08:45 +0000): Postal workers face job threats most every day, they do care about doing a good job, and work very hard. Pulling heavy equiptment around all day, loading and unloading tons of mail, and dealing with customers who just don't get it. They want to know why they didn't get their check or where their package is and it was just mailed yesterday. Think.
Postal workers where I live work very hard under difficult circumstances and are not paid very well for their troubles.
I support any effort to save the US Postal Service. I use it every day with great success.
Karen Ewald (Mon, 19 Sep 2011 22:35:15 +0000): Agree Brad....Pray congress fix this one too!