|
|
NEWS
RECALLS
COMPLAINT FORM
SCAM ALERTS
RESOURCES
Small Claims Guide Class Actions Lemon Laws FAQ Newsletters |
Share |
| Automotive Education Employment Electronics Family Finance Health Homeowners Insurance Pets Shopping Travel |
|
|
|
AT&T Telemarketing |
||||
|
This morning I got a call from an AT&T marketer who insisted, when I told him I was satisfied with my current long distance carrier, that I was not letting him have the opportunity to give me a better deal because I would not tell him how much I paid each month in long distance service. Then, when I indicated that I was on the Do Not Call list he began to argue with me about that. I am extremely angry that after being placed on the National Do Not Call list, AT&T would still give me a telemarketing call. Joyce should file a complaint with the Do-Not-Call registry. Patricia of Escanaba MI (9/9/03):
Stacey of Virginia Beach VA (7/22/03):
When it came to deciding about toll and long distance carriers, I told her I wanted to keep Sprint because I have 50 free minutes of long distance and we rarely exceed that. For tolls, I said it was fine to switch that to AT&T and asked if it is REQUIRED to dial a one before a local toll call. She said yes. So we made the switch. A few weeks later, I receive a partial bill from AT&T saying that I owe over $50.00 in "AT&T Long Distance Services". I immediately called AT&T and explained that the charges on my bill were for local calls. They said that the charges for local toll calls. I said that it couldn't be because I wasn't required to dial a one. They said that I didn't have to dial a one and that if I made the call I had to pay it. I explained that I have UNLIMITED LONG DISTANCE on my cell phone, so if I knew this was a long distance call, I would have called it from it. They said it is not a long distance number, but a toll call. (Of course it is listed under "long distance services" on my bill, but does not require a one in front of the number.) I also explained that with Verizon, that same number was not a toll number, it was local. They said they don't have to have the same local calling area and that they are not required to notify the customer of the change. I immediately switched to Sprint who requires a one in front of long distance AND local toll calls. I have since received another bill from AT&T. Now my total "long distance not requiring a one" is over $300.00! Can you believe it?! Damage Resulting: $300.00 plus in charges that I would not have incurred had I known that I was calling a "long distance" number. Maria of Brooklyn (8/19/03):
I was told that the account was opened on May 7, 2003 by way of Telemarketing. I asked the rep. to provide me with proof. He then informed me that someone would contact me with the recording of the call that was made. On Aug. 19, 2003 I recieved a call from AT&T and was played the recording of the call from May 7. The person recieving the call was a female who spoke Spanish and used my name but a wrong date of birth. I informed the rep that It was not me who accepted this call and that I was in NY at the time. After arguing the charges for approx 30 minutes with (2) reps and (2) different supervisors who were all very discourteous and very unprofesional, the matter was still not resolved and the rep informed me that the charges were still being billed to me. I also informed the rep that At my FL residence, I've subscribed to (Supra Telecom) which is a local phone company service and have a plan which only allow calls to be made to a 40 mile raduis. I did this in order to prevent unauthorized calls to be made. I feel this is unfair since AT&T failed to properly be sure that the person opening the account was the same person who owns the local account. Maria should immediately file a complaint with the Federal Communications Commission's enforcement bureau. Vincent of Sugar Grove WV (10/3/02):
The consequences are minor. My wife and I are to the point however where we feel slightly harassed. We answer our phone with the expectation of a family member, friend or a co-worker to be on the other line. When telemarketers (AT&T is not the only culprit, just the most prolific) seem to out number legitmate callers, we think there is a problem. Are there any recourses to legal action to punish companies that continually harass people in their home? We don't harass them...why do they feel free to harass us? Sharon of North Woodmere NY (7/16/03):
Bill of Los Angeles (9/7/02):
A month or so later I received my first bill and was irked to find that I was paying 10 cents a minute for most of my long-distance calls (5 cents for "off-peak") plus being charged a $3.95 monthly fee. Thinking that it was an error on their part, I called and pointed it out. I was told that there's no such thing as a 4.5 cent per minute charge with AT&T, and they would not credit me the difference. I asked them to check the recordings of the sales calls I assumed they made to verify my story, but was told they don't record those calls. I asked to speak to a supervisor since the so-called customer service rep I got was clearly not interested in my problem, but I got the same frustrating responses from that person as well. I asked to speak to HER supervisor, and got patched through to a voice mail. I left a calm message asking to be contacted to discuss this matter, but no one ever called me back. So, a couple of days later I switched to IDT which was much cheaper than AT&T's best rate. Then I started getting the most outragious calls from the AT&T telemarketers again who kept trying to get me to switch back. I told them their rates were uncompetitive, and I now hold a grudge against AT&T as well, so they're wasting their time with me. But they wouldn't take no for an answer, and basically resorted to hounding me. I finally had to tell the guy who was the worst offender that it seemed that there was no way to not agree to switch back and end the call amicably, and that he was forcing me to hang up on him. That didn't stop him either. I heard his pleads for me to reconsider grow fainter as I placed my phone back down to hang up. I had really thought that AT&T, as big as they are, would never resort to such horrible sales tactics as I witnessed, and that they would be far too smart to completely disregard a complaint from someone who could easily be a life-long customer if treated right. I will go out of my way to avoid using AT&T for any service they offer from this point out, and will encourage others to do the same. The economic consequences were very minor, probably less than $10. I was very upset at having been lied to so blatantly by their telemarketer, and then being treated by customer service reps as though I was trying to pull a fast one on THEM! Judy of San Jose, CA, writes:
|
|||
Back to the top | |
||||
Advertisement
|
|
Custom Search
|
||||
|
AUTOMOTIVE Dealers Manufacturers Service Extended Warranties Lemon Laws Recalls Tires Transporters FAMILY Aging Children, Parenting Recalls Dating Education Entertainment Pets Weddings |
FINANCE Annuities Banks Credit Cards Debt Collection Debt Counseling Insurance Investing Loans Mortgages Payday Loans Student Loans Tax Prep HEALTH Doctors Drugs, Pharmacies Health Clubs Hearing Care Hospitals Nursing Homes Nutrition, Diets Vision Care Weight Loss |
HOUSE & HOME Appliances Cookware Furniture Home Improvements Lawn & Garden Movers Pools & Spas Realtors, Rental Agents Recalls Utilities ELECTRONICS Cable TV/DBS Cameras Cell Phones Computers Home Electronics Internet Access Local Phone Service Long Distance VoIP |
SHOPPING In-Home Online Retail Stores Sporting Goods Supermarkets Telemarketers TRAVEL Airlines Bus Lines Car Rental Cruises Hotels Travel Agents Trains RESOURCES Class Actions Complaint Form Small Claims Guide Lemon Laws |
CONSUMER NEWS Latest News Automotive Telecom Financial Health Homeowners Scams Seniors Travel More ... RECALLS Automotive Children's Products Drugs Food Household Products Sporting Goods ABOUT US FAQ Privacy Policy Advertise With Us Newsroom Syndication Terms of Use |
Terms of Use Your use of this site constitutes acceptance of the Terms of Use
Copyright © 2003-2009 ConsumerAffairs.com Inc. All Rights Reserved. The contents of this site may not be republished, reprinted, rewritten or recirculated without written permission. |
|