
Mitsubishi Reviews
- We require contact information to ensure our reviewers are real.
- Our moderators read all reviews to verify quality and helpfulness.
- We use intelligent software that helps us maintain the integrity of reviews.
About Mitsubishi Motors
MITSUBISHI ELECTRIC manufactures a range of consumer electronics, including televisions, projectors and home theater systems. The company’s products cater to both residential and commercial markets and aim to enhance visual and audio performance.
Visit www.mitsubishicorp.com/jp/en/index.html- Good fuel efficiency
- Affordable maintenance costs
- Frequent mechanical issues
- Poor customer service experience
Mitsubishi Motors Reviews
Filter by Rating
- (23)
- (7)
- (5)
- (9)
- (128)
Popular Mentions
- 4,943,040 reviews on ConsumerAffairs are verified.
- We require contact information to ensure our reviewers are real.
- We use intelligent software that helps us maintain the integrity of reviews.
- Our moderators read all reviews to verify quality and helpfulness.
Recent
- Recent
- Oldest
- Most helpful
A link has directed you to this review. Its location on this page may change next time you visit.
- 4,943,040 reviews on ConsumerAffairs are verified.
- We require contact information to ensure our reviewers are real.
- We use intelligent software that helps us maintain the integrity of reviews.
- Our moderators read all reviews to verify quality and helpfulness.
Reviewed Feb. 12, 2008
my 2003 mitsubishi eclipse has small rust spots that are appearing on my hood.
Reviewed Jan. 3, 2008
I bought a 2002 Black Mitsubishi Galant. The paint started fading on the roof. I read online that there was a defect in the paint on black Mitsubishi galants, and I wasnt the only one having this problem. I contacted Mitsubishi and made a claim which after a couple of weeks was denied. I reinstated my claim and was denied again. A friend mine also has a 2002 Mitsubishi galant and Mitsubishi repainted her car. I asked Mitsubishi why they wouldnt repaint my car and they said because I am the second owner. I bought my car from a chevy dealer. That has nothing to do with it why should Chevy have to deal with what Mitsubishi messed up. I only have 45,000 miles on my car. Mitsubishi knows there is a defect in there paint and should fix there problem not shove it off on someone else. Now my whole car is getting white spots all over it. I spent every last dollar I have on buying this car. Please Help me and other 2002 Black Mitsubishi galant owners.
Reviewed Feb. 28, 2007
I turned in a leased 2003 Mitsubishi Outlander to Fountain Auto Mall dealership in Orlando, Florida. On 1/29/2007 I signed paperwork wherein the guy who accepted the car wrote there was no major damage. Two weeks later I received a statement from MMCA charging me a total of $1,377.60 for excessive wear & use charges. I had returned the car after 4 years of use with a 32,211 mileage which was way under the normal 48,000. Among other charges were 2 tire replacements at $150.00 a piece, spare tire replacement (which I never had any occasion to use) at $169.00.I was given 2 options: to pay the full amount within 7 months or in 2 months time with a 30% discount. I explained that this was an unreasonable offer for me in my present financial situation as i am retired and on a fixed income, which is why I couldn't even take them up on their offer to waive all charges if I buy or lease a new Mitsubishi. I've been a loyal Mitsubishi customer (this is my 3rd leased vehicle) with an unblemished payment record.
Reviewed April 21, 2004
I purchased a 2000 Mitsubishi Eclipse in July 2003. The clear coat on the top of the car is coming off. I had it to a body shop to be looked at and obtained a quote for $400 to repaint it.
Reviewed Jan. 12, 2004
I have a 2003 Mitsubishi Lancer - yellow. First the paint chipped and after getting the cold shoulder I called Mits Motors and finally they fixed Some of it but blamed it on me. Now my clutch went out. I have only 30,000 miles on the car and have been driving clutch for 11-12 years but they said its normal wear and tear and they won't fix it. It is going to cost almost $1000 and I don't know what to do. I will never own another Mitsubishi again!
Reviewed Oct. 2, 2003
The dealership quoted me $5,800. This would put the grand total at $13,800.00, more than the car is actually worth. I cant afford to come out of pocket more money to fix this vehicle. I contacted Mitsubishi again by letter. Their legal department informed me that there was a powertrain warranty up until 60,000 miles. Had I known that it would have gone straight to a dealership and been fixed. Mitsubishi Motors will not assist me in any way because the car didn't go right to a dealership, even though the timing belt broke before scheduled maintenance.
I believe Mitsubishi is wrong on many counts. First, the timing belt breaking before scheduled maintenance and destroying the engine is absurd in a $25,000 car. Second, after repeated attempts to find out about a warranty I was either ignored or given false information. Third, by denying any liability and stating word for word "that they can't justify helping me because the car didn't go to the delaership and that they had never heard of a problem like this before".
Every mechanic I have talked to has said that this is a very common problem with Mitsubishi cars. On a smaller note, both door handles have broken off this car (I think Tonka is made better) and the car leaks when it rains. You might expect something like this from a $9,000 Hyundai, not a $25,000 car.
Reviewed Sept. 24, 2003
I purchased a 1999 Mitsubishi Galant in January. I brought the car in about a month later complaining about the steering. I brought the car to get serviced 3 times for the same problem with no satifaction. They told me that it could be my tires that are causing the steering problem because they could be bad. I purchased 4 brand new tires that cost $600 and the problem still exists. I also brought the car in for a vibration and they told me it was my motor mounts. I replaced them and again, the problem still exists. When I went back to White Plains Mitsubishi I was given the cold shoulder.
I feel very unsafe driving this car. It is not stable and you cant drive the car without it drifting all over the place. It will lose control when hitting a minor pothole. Potholes cannot be avoided.
Reviewed Sept. 21, 2003
5-speed transmission went out with only 96,000 miles on the car. Also, the head gasket and oil sending units were leaking oil very badly. These repairs cost me a total of $1300. This is the first and last Mitsubishi I will ever own. Paid out $1300 for repairs on a car that is not even paid off yet.
Reviewed Sept. 8, 2003
I took our 2000 Mitsubishi Diamante to the Miller Mitsubishi dealership located at 5319 Van Nuys Blvd. on 7/28/03. My husband and I purchased the car at this dealership, and have always kept our cars well maintained inside and out. I brought the car in for some standard maintenance namely, oil and filter change and an air conditioning inspection and service. Also, I inquired about the on/off again SRS light and as to why the front drivers side door would not close properly without first rolling down the window.
I was informed that the car had troubles relating to the airbag. More specifically it had a faulty spring clock and module. That was surprising to hear for a car that is only 3 years old. However, what was more unbelievable was that we were told it would cost $982.00 to repair the faulty parts. My husband and I have owned many cars and have never experienced a problem such as this. We certainly understand normal wear and tear on moving parts on a vehicle. The spring clock and module are not moving parts and should not have failed before ever being used.
I asked if Mitsubishi would stand behind their product. Basically, I was informed that the car was out of warranty. After long discussions with one of the employees, Randy in the service department, I was told they would drop the price to $800.00 still an exorbitant amount (or pay $85.00 for the estimate to get our car back if we decided not to replace the ineffective parts.) This car has never been in an accident. The airbag has never been deployed. Obviously, these are original defective parts.
I asked Jay Akers (parts and service Director) if this has been a common problem with other customers. He replied that it was not. Therefore, my husband and I believe the company should in all fairness stand by the product for their customers and replace the two parts at their cost. A friend of ours also had problems regarding their airbag parts. Chrysler/Plymouth promptly replaced the parts with no charge to their customers. I drive my two daughters and myself in this car. This is an important safety issue concerning the air bag, which we want resolved by your company. I also have since learned that if I wanted to sell this car, a smog check could not be performed until the SRS light problem is resolved.
My husband I were considering purchasing a Mitsubishi SUV, yet so far the lack of loyalty to stand by its cars and customers after a car is sold off the lot is very disconcerting and at this point would not consider doing follow up business nor recommend Mitsubishi to our family and friends.
Reviewed March 3, 2003
The problem first started several years ago when I purchased my car brand new, and had my car serviced for a new transmission with continued issues every month since then. I continued to hear a squeaking sound and I had over $600 worth of work done on my car (timing belt, replaced cracked oil pan, ect). They could not tell me what the problem was. I still continued to notice the continued squeaking sounds. I would bring my car in and they would tell me it was nothing, then one day I was told that the pulley under the motor was cracked. I was later told that the pulley is underneath the motor where they were repairing the prior problem of the timing belt.
Reviewed Feb. 21, 2003
The body shop told me this has to be a defect in original paint for it to be cracking all the way through and that I should check with the manufacturer.
Reviewed March 3, 2002
I purchased a 1996 Mitsubishi Gallant from Rick Case Mitsubishi, which had about 15,000 miles on it. In June of 2001, I had a flywheel replaced, which cost me close to $1,000. But still, this is not the reason I am complaining.
The transmission in my vehicle is gone, leaving my car inoperable. The odometer only reads 50,216. I do not feel that a car with so few miles should have such a major problem. I have done everything required to maintain the condition of my Gallant, such as routine oil changes, wheel alignments, transmission fluids, etc. Ive called Rick Case Mitsubishi with this complaint and was told that I am one year too late to complain. In other words, if the transmission had went out in 2001, they would have repaired it. But now it will cost me approximately $3,000.
I purchased a Mitsubishi Gallant based on advertisements, which indicated that in 1997 or 98, it was the best selling car and I desperately needed a reliable vehicle. After talking with past and present Mitsubishi owners, I have learned that they too have had problems with their transmissions.
Reviewed Dec. 30, 2001
I took my Mitsu convertible (2001 Ecplise Spyder GT) in for service on 12/4/01 for 2 issues. The first, the SRS light was coming on while I was driving occasionally, the second being the rear window defroster was not working. On the first issue, they determined that one of the airbags needed to be replaced, and they ordered the part, and told me they'd call when it arrived. On the second issue, he stated that the rear window defroster had become disconnected with the rear glass. He said that this piece was welded on to the glass, and the only Mitsubishi recommended way to fix it was to replace the top.
On their own, they had gotten a recommendation from the Chevy dealer next door that they tried so they could avoid this. They got a Camaro defroster kit from the Chevy guys, and tried to use that to replace the wiring/connector, but after gluing it in, the service guy tested it, and the defroster still did not work. The service rep told me he would speak with the district service manager about this, determine next coarse of action, and call me. This never happened.
About 2 weeks after I got my car back, I noticed that they had damaged the top while it was in the shop that day. One of the snaps that connects the inside top liner with the outer liner back next to the rear window had been ripped out of the cloth. When I went back in to get the airbag replaced on 12/26/01, I pointed this out to them, and the service guy just looked at me like I was stupid. I asked about the rear defroster as well, and he mentioned that since I was the second owner, it may be an issue. He said that Mitsubishi did not like to replace tops for rear window defroster failures for second owners, as there may have been neglegence I did not know about.
I mentioned that the car was still under warranty, and he repeated the comment. He said that since it was a separation of the wiring, it may not be an issue. After arriving at home after dropping my car off, I immediately called MMSA and spoke with a customer servive rep. After explaining the situation, she called the service manager, who assured her that everything would be fixed that day. When I went back to get my car that night, I was told that the rear defroster was working, but I should not use it for 24 hours to allow the glue to dry. I asked about the liner snap, and he said that it went right back in to place.
After getting home, I got back there to see if the snap was fixed, and he had lied. The snap did not go back in, they made another hole and put the snap in there. Does not seem very stable to me, and I would assume that if I ever took the car to aother dealer for top work, they would invalidate the warranty based on this. Also, I tested out the rear defroster for the first time today (4 days after picking it up) and it still does not work. Appears they tried another Camaro kit in my car. If I wanted a Camaro, I would have bought one. I expect my car to be restored to the condition it was when it left the factory.
Reviewed Nov. 5, 2001
I purchased a car in October of 96, a 1997 Mitsubishi Eclipse. It was the first model out, and of course has had nothing but problems. At this time, it is once again broken down. The belt tension is out, and when I notified Mitsubishi, they informed me that there is a bulletin informing consumers to replace various parts due to upgraded parts that are in.
My concern is that my car has had more problems than the average car, and I would like to know who to contact to discuss this problem. My power steering pump also went out last year -- it exploded, causing metal fragments to get in the steering column and drive shaft. They replaced it ($1,600 at their cost) but I don't believe a car should have this many bulletins out.
Reviewed Feb. 22, 2001
I was involved in a head-on collision. I was traveling about 40 mph and hit the person head-on. I had to be taken to the hospital by ambulance so I did not get to immediately see my car. Once I saw my car I realized that the airbags did not deploy.
The bodyman that fixed my car told me that the car had never been in a accident before mine and that he could not locate the sensors for the airbags. He bought a schematic from Renn Kirby here in Frederick, which is where I bought the car from. He looked over the car once again and could not find any sensors on the car at all.
I took my car to Renn Kirby for them to hook the car up to a computer and see if the airbags are working, however, once I got there then they refused to give me a service slip or give me verification that the airbags were working. I know that there is something wrong with my car and it seems as if no one is here to help me. I have researched this online and found several occasions where this has happened to several other people. When is someone going to listen?
April should file a report with the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, which investigates safety defects.
Mitsubishi Motors Company Information
- Company Name:
- Mitsubishi
- Website:
- www.mitsubishicorp.com
