Mazda 3 Reviews

4,918,519reviews on ConsumerAffairs are verified
  • We require contact information to ensure our reviewers are real.
  • Our moderators read all reviews to verify quality and helpfulness.
  • We use intelligent software that helps us maintain the integrity of reviews.

About Mazda 3

The Mazda 3 is a fuel-efficient 4-door sedan with three available trims. Read more Mazda reviews to learn about other models.


Visit www.mazdausa.com/vehicles/mazda3-sedan

Mazda 3 Reviews

Filter by Rating

  • (14)
  • (3)
  • (7)
  • (10)
  • (52)

Popular Mentions

    How do I know I can trust these reviews about Mazda 3?
    • 4,918,519 reviews on ConsumerAffairs are verified.
    • We require contact information to ensure our reviewers are real.
    • We use intelligent software that helps us maintain the integrity of reviews.
    • Our moderators read all reviews to verify quality and helpfulness.
    Recent
    • Recent
    • Oldest
    • Most helpful

    A link has directed you to this review. Its location on this page may change next time you visit.

    How do I know I can trust these reviews about Mazda 3?
    • 4,918,519 reviews on ConsumerAffairs are verified.
    • We require contact information to ensure our reviewers are real.
    • We use intelligent software that helps us maintain the integrity of reviews.
    • Our moderators read all reviews to verify quality and helpfulness.
    Page 3 Reviews 40 - 240
    CoveragePriceStaff

    Reviewed May 1, 2015

    I bought a new 2008 Mazda 3 from the dealership in 2008. In 2011 the sunroof failed and wouldn't shut. I brought it in to be repaired at which time I was told it needed to be replaced which would cost 3000$. ** told me my original warranty expired but if I purchase the extended warranty for 2000$ I would save 1000$. So I purchased the extended warranty based on that information and they kept my car for about 4 days and also fixed a recall issue. The buildings were under renovations so when I picked my car up ** told me the copy machine was down and he couldn't give me paperwork but it was all in computer. I got my car and left. Roof worked so I didn't think much of it at the time.

    Flash forward to March 2015. My sunroof failed again. I opened it. Couple hours later I tried to shut it and it made a noise and ceased. Took the car to Mazda Dealer. I waited 2 hours and ** came out and told me the roof was covered but I needed 2000$ worth of work. He said my rear brakes were metal to metal, it was leaking oil .... he went on and on then he said "I want to put you in a new car." The car was running great and I never seen a drop of oil on ground the ground so red flags began to pop up. I told ** "I didn't have money for all that right now but let's move forward with the roof." We made appointment for me to get a loaner car the following week and have roof repaired.

    I decided to get another opinion on all the other work and come to find out the majority of work ** said I needed done was not needed. My rear brakes were fine, I was told new cars spew out more oil than my car was and basically not much needed to be done. Total came to 296$. Now I know that ** at the Mazda Dealer can not be trusted. I kept this information under my hat.

    The day came for me to drop car off and get loaner car. At the end of day ** told me the roof was not covered. When I asked "why?" He said it was caused by debris. I asked to see it and was told they left it in roof. When I took car home there was dust and pollen on roof so I knew it had not been touched. When I called the warranty company to find out why my roof failed in 2011, they said they never paid out for a roof. When I asked Mazda dealer for the cause the roof failed in 2011 they said all their paper work was missing but magically they have the recall info. I feel they never replaced the roof, lied to get 2000$ out of me for an extended warranty, lied about debris being the cause so they can void coverage by the extended warranty.

    I spoke to Service Manager, General Manager and they all talk in circles justify all the fabrications and finally told me I am not allowed to go back there anymore. I asked for all the paperwork in the file on my car and ** the General Manager gave me two pieces of paper... from April 29,2015.

    Thanks for your vote!
    Customer ServicePriceStaff

    Reviewed April 28, 2015

    I took my 2010 Mazda 3 into the dealership for oil change, tire rotation, repair both front struts, wheel alignment almost a month ago. 2 days later I heard noise, I returned my car again. They said it was brake noise but there was nothing wrong with my brakes. 2 weeks after that I heard noise again but thought it was the road. The following week my husband & I were driving and the noise was louder. I immediately made another appt to Mazda dealership but before I went something told me to check my tires. I took my car to Firestone and watched them observe my car tires. Both front tires were loose and a lug nut was missing. Once they tightened my wheels three noise was instantly gone. They ask me did I have recent work on my car and I said "yes, at the Mazda dealership."

    I immediately called Mazda only for the representative to tell me that there's no way that I could drive my car for almost a month with those tires loose and maybe someone is tampering with my car in the parking lot. Very unprofessional statement first. Secondly, I informed her that I don't drive my car regularly because I had hand surgery Mar 11 and my car is parked majority of the time in my garage. I am so dissatisfied with her response and with the neglect of the person who performed the service on my car. This is the reason why people are so hesitant to go to the dealership and price increase but I trusted them and this is the thanks I got!

    Thanks for your vote!
    PricePunctuality & Speed

    Reviewed Feb. 3, 2015

    I bought a new Mazda 6 GT 2014 (Oct 2014 ), that include the BOSE system with the GPS. After 1 day with the car, I realize that it didn't work quickly and easy with my iPOD touch, to play music. It take a long long long time to recognize and be usable to play (between 10 and 15 min.) plus , every time you stop, it start all over again the same long routine. I had to transfer all my music on USB keys, which was a loss of my time. I check the problem on internet and I am not the only one to complain.

    Plus now (Jan 2015), I tried to plug my MOTO G phone for recharging and the USB port doesn't read this phone, even for a simple recharge (Ok for Bluetooth). At Least my iPOD can be recharge in the USB port?? For my point of view, it is a very cheap for a BOSE audio system. Even my friend basic Hyundai ELANTRA system work very well and fast with all my electronic toys.

    For the Brakes, it is my second Mazda, (previous was a 2005 Mazda 3 GT, new) and those were very good and long lasting brakes. I change the front brakes once in 287000 km and twice in the rear. On my MAZDA 6 2014, after 44000 km, they look like they won't last long. The dealer told me that we have to get them to dismantle the Caliper, to lubricate and keep them from locking/griping, that on a regular basis?? I will check this summer, when I switch to summer wheels if they are still good. The ABS is very nervous and weird in winter condition??

    For now, since I keep my car for a minimum of 7-8 years, and high mileage, I am happy with my MAZDA except for the above . It drive very good, cheap on gas for a big car ( average 7.1 ltr on the computer after a year). The manual transmission is fun, and it is the reason i bought it, over a Mazda 3 GT 2014 (manual not avail on top model).

    One last thing, the seats and the interior fit and finish are very good, but my ceiling panel cracks and groan big time in cold Canadian weather, which I didn't have this issue with my Mazda 3, during the 8 years of ownership. If I would buy another one (MAZDA)??, I don't know, if the electronic is the same, it is a big NO (before Mazda I was a VW fanatic, almost bought a GTI ilo the Mazda 6). Overall the 6 looks better and drive as good as my old 3, but my 3 felt like overall more durable on long term.

    Thanks for your vote!
    Customer ServiceInstallation & Setup

    Reviewed Nov. 26, 2014

    I bought a 2011 Mazda 3 touring and when I drove my car around the lot area, the guy told me to keep it under 50 mph. Should have taken that as a red flag but I didn’t. I was interested in the Mazda 3 because the gas mileage was good and it didn't compromise the performance. Immediately after I bought the car and took the car over 50mph, the tire noise was pretty annoying, and for the 2011 model, I've learned this is common. I got used to it and the car had been great until the second year I owned it. During the hot summer my dashboard adhesive came undone, exposing a gaping hole in my dashboard where the display is. Contacted their customer service and they were very condescending and unpleasant. They offered 450 bucks to replace the dashboard finally, but they expected me to pay 300 bucks for the labor of installation. It's a big deal to me that the parts inside the car didn't even last 3 years. Will never buy another Mazda again and I will spread the word on how poor quality of a car they are. My car light buttons popped out too. Better options out there. Forget Mazda.

    Thanks for your vote!
    Customer ServiceCoverage

    Reviewed Nov. 15, 2014

    First of all, I was so happy when I bought my 2011 Mazda 3i Touring. I was annoyed that it didn't come with the keyless entry (for some reason they didn't have the beeper thing for it) and no spare key... but I went ahead with it anyway. I moved to Florida and at the Mazda dealership here. They told me the dealer should have had a spare key made for me.. since if you lose the one you literally can't drive the car. Called the dealership: no help. Called corporate: no help. On top of that, I had to put $1000 in repairs to the car after only 2 years because, of course, those things weren't covered under the warranty. I've bought cars from Buy Here Pay Heres that I didn't have to pay repairs for while I had a loan. It's sad. The no spare key thing was the last straw and I immediately headed to Hyundai and who took my Mazda although I owed $10,000 still and ended up with a 2015 Elantra with no money down, a better APR, and OMG a spare key and keyless entry!

    Thanks for your vote!

    Reviewed Oct. 19, 2014

    My Mazda 3 is the 6th Mazda I've owned over many, many years of driving. It's just about to roll over to 100,000 km - absolutely trouble free! It's highly unlikely I'll ever buy anything but a Mazda - I've had such great service from all of them. I just this year passed an RX7 on to a new owner after 23 years of having it ('84 GSL-SE)! Maybe they don't make them quite like they used to but the interior of that 30 year old car was still in mint condition as was the body. Thanks, Mazda!

    Thanks for your vote!
    Installation & Setup

    Reviewed Oct. 7, 2014

    Mazda 3 2012 i touring - After 2 years and 8 months my Mazda 3 radio stopped working (THANK GOD IT WAS UNDER WARRANTY). They had to replace the radio head unit. Mazda said they had no Others with this problem! But it is a known problem. It is the Bose10 Speaker sound System that in Mazda forums has 22k posts on that failure. Why doesn't Mazda recall this car for this problem? I asked how long they would warranty the work and they told me 3 years, 36,000 miles (nothing no warranty on replacement) because it was a warranty fix. If I would have paid $1050.00 for the head unit and $150 to install it they would only then warranty it but they would not say for how long. What a crock of **. No more Mazda for me. I hope this is it for now. Very disappointed.

    Thanks for your vote!
    Customer Service

    Reviewed July 23, 2014

    We have a 2002 Mazda Protege and wanted to do some routine service, including replacing the coolant with the genuine Mazda product (dark green with phosphate added for added corrosion protection), as this had been switched out by the local garage. Also, we wanted all the hoses changed. I was quoted a price of $419 including parts and labor. I then asked them to add a Mazda-sourced thermostat which retails for $30. I wrote on the drop-off form to call me if the charges exceeded $450, as I felt the thermostat was quickly accessible with the lower radiator hose already off for changing.

    Long story short, they did not call me but added $90 to this already padded bill to change the thermostat. This was in the state of CT, and have had this issue before, where the shop does not call before adding more labor to the bill. Make sure when in CT that you warn the mechanic not to do this, as the state laws are apparently very soft on this.

    Otherwise, the car has been excellent over 12 years and 100,000 miles of service. Unlike the new Mazdas, the windows are large and easy to see out of. And with winter tires, the car is unstoppable here in the Northeast. I highly recommend the Protege as a used car if you can find one with relatively low miles. As for the dealer where we purchased it in 2002, horrible experience and the minute we took delivery they did not want to have anything to do with us. Lucky this Mazda was trouble-free during the warranty period, unlike the many others reporting here on the newer Mazda 3.

    Thanks for your vote!
    Verified purchase
    Reliability

    Reviewed July 20, 2014

    2008 Mazda 3 w/ 32,000 miles - defective coil spring (corrosion shows the weak spot in the manufacturing of the steel spring). It should not snap apart, but commonly does and not because it's normal for thick steel to snap apart (many others have the same problem - check the internet to confirm). Dealers can NEVER and I mean never find the rattle. Feel inside the cup to find the broken off piece. I was fortunate and found another person (not a Mazda dealer) who found it on his own and has posted the information on the internet. The worst of it is that when you have a manufacturing defect like this, it means that replacement parts are also defective. I've seen others complaining about having to fix this multiple times because it's a manufacturing defect.

    Thanks for your vote!
    Punctuality & Speed

    Reviewed July 17, 2014

    2014 Mazda 3i Grand Touring, 6M, 4000 miles, 41mpg avg last 4 tanks. First brand-new vehicle at the tender age of 56. Not fast, but quick. Astounding handling, completely unruffled, the platform begs to be thrown around. Best-handling car I'd ever owned was a '76 Lancia Beta coupe; this one is better. Manual gearbox, exceptionally tight pattern with ratios set just right. Complaint: backlight is essentially useless. I wouldn't own one without the backup camera. Once had an '89 626, gave her away with 300k on the clock. Absolutely bulletproof. Just hope this one approaches that level of reliability.

    Thanks for your vote!
    Customer ServicePriceStaffReliability

    Reviewed July 13, 2014

    I purchased a brand new 2012 Mazda 3 skyactiv. I was looking at the sp25, but I was given all this false information about this SKYACTIV version that was all new technology sporty more performance more torque and was great on the fuel. Since the first day I have had nothing but dramas. I have taken it back to the dealership so many times I cannot remember. I brought up issues like the car not having the advertised 4-2-1 exhaust headers that are one of the most important parts to the skyactiv being a good motor putting the skyactiv engine in the Mazda three without the most essential parts has actually made the car much less effective than the normal mar. The fuel consumption is terrible has no low end torque the performance can only be described as shocking.

    A maxi sport is a much faster and performs much better and is a large amount of money cheaper. I have been banned from taking my car back to the dealer who sold me the car for no reason and have also been told that my extended warranty is not valid at any other dealer than the one the car was purchased from. I have tried to call Mazda and get help and they just tell me they have nothing to do with the car and to go to the dealer. All Mazda do is sell the cars to dealers and they hold zero responsibility in regards to problems with their product and offer no help to rectify any issues. I have had the car looked at by a performance shop and they have told me the car is a total lemon and it is not in any way the brochures describe the car and it is a disgrace that I cannot do anything to fix the issues.

    I have been having a constant list of problems coming up with the car and it is like extracting teeth to get the warranty issues fixed. Mazda are a disgrace of a company they have no worry about taking advantage of people and there way of dealing with any issues is to ignore it and pass the buck every time. What does a person need to do to get their brand new car looked at and how can a company that manufactures a car claim to have no obligation about their product. And any conduct issues about the product are all the responsibility of the dealer as they are a franchise. This is something that needs to be addressed and if I want something done and want to pay for it, they have all the time in the world need something defective fixed and they will do anything to not need to do it.

    Has anyone else been having issues with the 2012 Mazda 3 Skyactiv? If so please comment on it and if have had any luck getting the issue fixed please comment so I math be able to get the issues fixed before I park it through their shop window because it is a worthless bit of car. And I still need to pay the finance on it but I'm still stuck with the lemon. Mazda you are a disgrace and I hope you get what is coming to you, what goes around comes around. And one day you will get what you deserve and I would never recommend that anyone buys a Mazda because they will regret it, I can promise that. The dealer I felt with is Mazda Brookvale 2100 the salesman Tom ** and he will lie and do anything to make the sale though has little to no knowledge about the product he is selling!!!!!!!!!!!!

    Thanks for your vote!
    PriceReliability

    Reviewed May 8, 2014

    I absolutely hate Mazda. I bought a brand new 2012 Mazda 3 Skyactiv and from day 1 have had nothing but nightmare problems. Mazda Corporate will not take responsibility and I was told to go back to the dealership. I had only had the car about 9 months and it had been in the shop 6 times for weeks on end. Overland Park Mazda told me they would not exchange the car because they would lose money on a "bad car" and the GM freely admitted it was a bad car. They offered to trade me in to the exact same car but I would have to pay over $3000.00 difference plus new sales tax, etc. because the price had gone up.

    My car had issue after issue trying to die at stops or in stop and go traffic, getting 22 mpg hwy miles (which I was told was normal), freezing in first gear or not shifting out of first gear, running loud and hot (which I was told was normal), and a slew of defective parts that seem to pop up every few months. Even though I purchased an extended warranty, I was told by Overland Park Mazda that I was no longer allowed to bring the car back for service and because my car had been in the shop so much prior that I was no longer allowed a courtesy car which has been noted in my account so no matter where I take it I get refused. If my car had worked in the first place, I wouldn't have needed a loaner. I paid for my car so I could drive it.

    It's been an epic battle with Mazda any time I need service because they refuse to allow techs to even look at it on a Saturday or without discussing the issue with corporate due to the amount of issues I've had already. This combined with the inability to have a courtesy loaner or shuttle means I have to take time off work and borrow a car or get rides every time my car needs maintenance. I just picked it up yesterday from yet another major repair that took me borrowing my dad's car for 4 days and again missing work.

    All I wanted was to buy a good reliable car and what I got was the absolute worst nightmare I have ever experienced for the last 2 years. I would gladly trade the car off for a comparable car, but Mazda refuses to accept any responsibility for the bad car and they told me the only thing they'll offer is a discount on a new Mazda if I want to trade out of the car.. I will never own or even suggest anyone else buy a Mazda as long as I live and breathe. DO NOT BUY A MAZDA, EVER!!! They used to be great and now they are just garbage.

    Thanks for your vote!
    Coverage

    Reviewed April 15, 2014

    2012 Mazda 3 engine with 36,000 miles failed. Said it was a Wrist Pin failure and internal engine severely damaged. We could not prove oil changes every 3,000 to 5,000 miles so factory warranty did not provide any coverage. Needs engine replacement $7,000 for dealer and at least $3,000 for used engine replacement. To be 100% fair, my son drove the car and probably didn't get the oil changed every 3000 miles, but it's not like it went 15,000 miles without an oil change. The engine should not have failed. Very concerning issues with the Mazda engines.

    Thanks for your vote!

    Reviewed April 13, 2014

    I purchased a 2012 Mazda 3I Sport and it turned into a living nightmare. I noticed the car began developing brake failure a year after purchase. The brake pedal became mushy. I had the brake pads replaced and the rotors turned but there were no changes in braking power. In November 2013, I rear ended someone after the brakes failed to work. Luckily it was not at a high speed nor was anyone hurt. It happened during morning stop and go traffic on the way to work. I've had the vehicle sitting in my driveway. I'm afraid of driving it. Has anyone else experienced any brake problems with Mazda vehicles?

    Thanks for your vote!
    Customer Service

    Reviewed March 12, 2014

    Bought our Mazda 3 new at Mazda dealership and have had oil change done there on a regular basis since day one. Vehicle has 156,000 kms on it. Last oil change 3000 kms ago. While driving the car we heard a ticking sound and stopped to check the noise. Checked my oil and no oil to be seen, poured two liters in crankcase and took to local mechanic to verify noise. He also put two liters of oil in the crankcase. There are no visible signs of leakage or oily deposits around tailpipe so drove it to the Mazda dealership for an assessment.

    They mentioned that I had burned four liters of oil in about 3000 kms and could/would not provide an answer as to the large oil loss. They said it would be okay to drive. Shortly afterwards the ticking became a clanking noise and had to get the vehicle towed to the dealership for another assessment. The service manager assured me that it was just a turned bearing and could be repaired. Apparently not as there was severe damage to the engine and could not repair or rebuild. They suggested a used engine with 80,000 kms as a replacement.

    Reading many articles on the web, apparently at 80,000 kms is when many 2.3 owners were having difficulties with their engines. I eventually bought a remanufactured engine and had the local mechanic do the installations. Due to the large number of complaints about this engine and in particular mine and knowing that the car has been serviced by Mazda since day one I will be processing a small claims court action against Mazda. This or similar engine should be quite capable of reaching 250-300,000 kilometers.

    I believe that the ZOOM ZOOM company is selling an engine with very little long term advantages. There are many stories on the web to substantiate my claim. Mazda should be ashamed of themselves for selling an inferior product and not standing behind their not so quality engine.

    Thanks for your vote!
    Customer ServicePunctuality & SpeedStaff

    Reviewed Feb. 9, 2014

    I'm writing here to make you aware of my bad experience with Mazda. Unfortunately for a very bad luck I'm having some trouble with my brand new Mazda 3 2014. I'm having one of the most annoying issue that you could never ever experience... an intermittent problem. The issue is related to the backup camera, intermittently it does not work.

    I have visited a service department already 3 times, the first time it was on Wednesday 22nd January 2014 (if I remember well). At that time one of the acceptance person saw the issue with my backup camera, but unfortunately the garage was already closed at 6PM, so he told me to bring back the car any day later. So I did... I brought back the car there the following Saturday 25th. After a wait of about a hour the acceptance person and one of the technicians came to me and they told me that the issue was solved with a software update released by Mazda also aiming to resolve this KNOWN issue. I left the facility very happy...

    Few days back I have experienced the same issue. Too bad! So I went back to the service department on Saturday 1st February 2014. After some discussions we have agreed to leave the car there for some tests. Just to let you know, I did not ask, and I did not get offered any car loaner for the inconvenience. Tuesday February 4th 2014, I got a call back from the service manager. He was telling me that I had to pick back my car even though the issue wasn't solved. Seems that they were not being able to reproduce the problem in 3 days, so he asked me to take back the car and take a picture when the problem happened again. Also he told me that this was not a known issue for Mazda. He told me that this was a mandatory step to move forward to Mazda support in order to get some kind of decision on how to proceed or how to fix this issue. So I did, even though I was not very persuaded, initially it was a KNOWN issue later on it wasn't anymore.

    On February 5th, 2014, I took a video of the issue and I brought the car back to them as requested. The service manager was very nice with me, he has explained me that now they had all the needed information and evidences to bring this on higher level, but I had to be patient and leave the service department with my car and wait their call back for instructions. So, I did, I was pretty happy about the agreed plan.

    Around an hour later I got a call back from Mazda customer service... The person at the phone was telling me that even though I brought the video to the service department this was not enough to provide any solution or to fix the problem, because the issue has to be reproduced by Mazda's technicians, so I told him that the acceptance person has seen the problem and he knows about it... but the person at the phone told me that no one has mentioned that...???

    I felt teased, and frustrated... I lost already a lot of my working time behind this issue. So I told him, okay, I'll bring the car back to the service and I will leave it there for the needed time, but I would need a car loaner in the meantime... I cannot stay without the car for such long time... So he told me that this is not possible for some unreasonable reasons! At this point I got seriously disappointed, frustrated and pissed off! I was trying to find a peaceful solution with Mazda, but now he was telling me that, basically, I can keep the car as it is, with this problem!?! I was thinking...Ehi!!! My money were all good, I did not pay with broken bucks! Why should I keep the car with this problem?! Finally Mazda left me with a faulty brand new car!!! Think twice before spend your money towards a Mazda car. Cars are very beautiful, but unfortunately the customer service is very disappointing.

    Thanks for your vote!

    Reviewed Feb. 4, 2014

    I'm in Egypt. I bought a new Mazda 3 2014 car and I received my car from Obour distributor branch on 27.01.2014. I felt that the brake is abnormal, very soft and there is a space until I can feel that it takes an action. My sister already have the same car but 2011 and the brake isn't the same. I called Obour’s branch manager in the same day and he told me try it until 1000 maintenance and if there is something wrong they will fix it. I went to the Abu Rawash maintenance branch on the same day to check what’s wrong with it. They did their checks on the whole brake system and it showed nothing and they told me may be it takes some time until it gets normal as this is a zero car.

    I tried it again on 28.01.2014 and I still feel that there is something wrong. I tried a friend’s Mazda 3 2014 car and I got sure that I had a problem in my brake system. I'm very frustrated and I went Mazda Abu Rawash on 28.01.2014 to check this again, and they spent the whole day to check them and at the end this did something to the back brake. The issue has been enhanced but the problem still existing. Kindly assist as this is not an expected behavior from a Zero car so either to fix it or change the car for me.

    Thanks for your vote!
    Customer ServiceCoverageStaff

    Reviewed Oct. 23, 2013

    I bought a car, Mazda 3 Model 2011 in Egypt. And it dawned to me that the car is protected by not rolling over 180 km/h speed, in order to be under the cover of the guarantee and I am committed to periodic maintenance schedule. Before doing the scheduled maintenance of 40,000 kilometers, I was driving on the highway to another city. I was surprised by the exit of oil in large quantities on the motor while I was driving on a speed near to 160 km/h which led to the escalation of fumes and thick smoke which affected my vision of the road & posed a danger to my life. Then, when I went to maintenance agent, they stated that the oil that was covering the motor was the transmission oil and there is no record of any problem on the Car computer. So they asked me to follow up with them if it happened again, and it was repeated several times and every time I communicate the problem with the maintenance agent and they check the car, they tell me that they don't have a solution for this problem.

    So I hope that you take the necessary action to resolve the problem or change the car completely or provide me with a redemptive value of what has been paid in the car, especially as the car is still in warranty and so avoid the risk of surprise, which can lead my life to danger or avoid any problem in the motor. And if I don't receive any reply or the problem will not solved, I will be obligated to report my complaint to the Official/Governmental Egyptian authorities responsible for protecting my rights, or to the media, which will play a very negative role on the company's reputation and the reputation of the car inside Egypt and the Middle East.

    Thanks for your vote!
    Customer ServiceCoverageStaff

    Reviewed Oct. 9, 2013

    My 2009 Mazda 3 GT (purchased new) motor makes a noise and a diagnostic I paid for indicates the motor needs replacement. Toronto Mazda (dealer) asked for receipts from the last dealer service I had to current (June 2012 to October 2013). I supplied them and was told that they would phone me when Mazda Canada had made a decision and it would be approx. 5 days or so. The mileage is at 96K. I waited and finally phoned the Service Dept and was told that he would phone me back. I did not get any phone call. I called several times with the same promise and results. I finally phoned and reminded them I was needing an answer before the 100K was surpassed and the warranty would be over.

    The Service Mgr (Rick) phoned me back and said that some of my receipts had no logo and he was sure they were fake. I suggested he could contact the business where they were done and confirm them if he had doubts. He said it wasn't 'his job' to do that and that it was my job to satisfy him. Finally, he admitted he had not even submitted anything to Mazda Canada for consideration and he would not. He did not offer me any suggestions as to what I should do to ameliorate the situation.

    I phoned Mazda Canada and they indicated that as long as I had an 'open work order' I would still have warranty coverage even if the mileage surpassed the 100k. (The car still runs with the noise but I was advised it will suddenly die altogether at some point in the very near future.) Mazda Canada customer support person stated they would look into it and call me back in a few days. I finally called the same service rep back to advise him that Mazda Toronto did not have an open work order and they refused to open one. I was told that Mazda Canada could not make a dealer open one and without one, once the 100k is reached, I have no warranty. He suggested I phone the General Mgr of Mazda Toronto and discuss it with him. I said that after all the crap they have given me, I was not confident it would do much good. The Service Rep then stated that he would no longer deal with me because I was using 'foul language and it was too rude' and he was terminating my call. I asked if I could have the name of a Customer Service Supervisor or be put through to one, and he refused.

    I phoned back right away and a lady CS Rep spoke to me and said she would take over where the last CR Rep terminated because there was no Supervisor available and I was to call her and let her know how I make out with the alternate dealer. I attended a dealer closer to my current residence and they removed the valve cover and found it had no sludge, so that indicates my oil changes were done as far as they can tell. They have no idea why the motor is failing until the motor is either torn apart etc. This dealer wants receipts from purchase time almost 5 years ago until current. I am now locating the numerous receipts as I remember where I might have gotten them done.

    This lack of service is not acceptable. I am a senior widow and this was to be my last vehicle. I hand wash and wax and clean the car regularly, do regular maintenance and keep it in good shape because it was intended to be my last vehicle. Now I just want to get rid of it and get anything as long as it isn't a Mazda. I like the car, but the service from both the dealer and the company is deplorable.

    I need a vehicle for numerous medical appointments all over the area so I am still driving the car. I still don't know what will transpire with this alternate dealer where I have taken it. I am not too hopeful that anything will happen at all. They have opened a work order for me so as long as they don't close it, the warranty should be in place. This dealer (service Mgr.) is aware of the problems I have been experiencing and is willing to submit the claim to Mazda Canada when I accumulate the receipts for oil changes that were done out of town, etc., at other than a Mazda Dealer. This clearly stresses to me that I need to keep everything re a vehicle even if it is a simple oil change receipt. I should have some answer within the next weeks as to whether Mazda will replace the motor or not.

    Thanks for your vote!
    Customer ServiceInstallation & Setup

    Reviewed Sept. 20, 2013

    I bought a new Mazda 3. Before I got it 20 miles, the oil light came on. They hauled back to the dealer and repaired it. When I picked up, it had been driven 100 miles. After they closed the work order, the license plates they were to install had been stolen. Some things my wife had put in the vehicle had also been removed. I informed the service department when I picked it up. I then tried to contact management to make them aware of what was happening in their company and since they never returned my call, I assume this sort of thing is normal practice. Since I won't be buying from them again, I just wanted to let anyone that may be looking to buy be aware of what could happen to them. NO REPLY FROM YOU IS WANTED. WHAT IS BROKEN CANNOT BE FIXED.

    Thanks for your vote!

    Reviewed July 18, 2013

    2012 Mazda 3 Hatchback stickshift - I bought the car in July of 2012, and it ran fine for about 6 months. Then it seemed to lose the zip it had. I took it in for the 7,500 mile service, but it was worse. At 8,500 miles, I took it in again. It was idling wrong. Sure enough. The service tech said they needed to r and r the intake manifold. It was a two day job. R and r was remove and replace, but not with a new part--it was only cleaned.

    The car still wasn't running the way it was when I bought it. I was very disappointed. The clutch and shifting were finicky. At 9,500 miles, as I was driving home through a winding canyon road, I had great difficulty getting the car into first gear. It was not easy to get home. I had to signal cars to pass me while I struggled with the shifting. The car was towed into the dealer. Turns out to be the slave cylinder. They had the car for 3 days and had to flush all of the hydraulic system--clutch and brakes.

    I have been completely unhappy with this car. It is not the car that I bought only 1 year ago. Don't buy a Mazda 3 with Sky Active technology. You're buying the financing, not the car.

    Thanks for your vote!
    Punctuality & Speed

    Reviewed May 30, 2013

    We purchased a new Mazda3 in April of 2012. Approximately 6 months later, the vehicle started acting up and my son contacts the dealership where we purchased the car. They told him to take it in. Once they inspected the car, they told us that the warranty was void because my son had some modifications to the muffler. He also added a few items to the character of the body, not the engine. Bottom line, we ended having to replace the transmission and the clutch that ran us at $1,600 and now about six months later, we are having to replace the clutch again and they are not going to warranty it again. That is another $600.

    Thanks for your vote!
    Customer ServiceCoverageStaff

    Reviewed March 2, 2013

    My daughter bought a 2006 Mazda 3 in October 2011. Back in June of 2012, she was having issues with it not shifting, black smoke coming out from the back, and clanging noise from underneath. She first took it to a Mazda dealer in Virginia, and told them of all the things that were going on with the car - not shifting, smoking, and noise from underneath. They tested the car and told us they found nothing wrong. She moved to Greenville in August and the car was acting up on and off between that time we had it in the shop up to the time we took it to John Finger Mazda dealership in October. We told them that it was not shifting, burning black smoke from the back, we heard noises from underneath, a clunking sound, and the breaks were squeaking. So I spoke with someone in the service shop personally and told them to check the breaks, the transmission and the noise that was coming from underneath. They called back within a day and said they found nothing wrong. We could not get it to do what we told them was happening, so hesitantly we took the car back.

    I rode in the car several times and it was acting up on and off, but was not consistent and was doing all the things we told them was happening. We then took the car back in on February 24th. My daughter told them it was not shifting, smoking, she smelled some kind of fluid leaking, the steering wheel was shaking and it was running hard. They took it out and drove it for miles, called her back, said they found nothing. They could not get it to do what she was claiming to do. I called them back and was told they found nothing wrong, could not get it to do anything but did notice the transmission not shifting right. They said they would take it out again on Monday the 28th. That morning of the 28th, they called my daughter at 9 am, told her the shocks were leaking, the left tire was damaged, the boot on the front axle was cracked, the axle was broken and the shocks were damaged. Hmmm. How come all of a sudden all these issues surfaced? They hooked it up to the computer system both in October and this time, and found nothing wrong. And without taking it out again on the 28th, all these issues surfaced - the same issues that I am sure were there in October.

    I was told that the extended warranty would fix the transmission but nothing else and that the axle would not be covered because the cracked boot had dirt in it and was the cause of the axle breaking. After talking to another mechanic about this, I was told that the cracked boot would have not caused the axle to have broken, and if the shocks were leaking fluid, they should have caught that which they did not till this time in February not in October, which we smelled the same fluid in October as we did in February. The co-owner asked me if the shocks were leaking fluid, would that have caused your shocks to be damaged? I said, “Yes it would.” He laughed at me and said, “No it would not,” and I said, “Yes it would.” Then, he asked if I was going to take the car to another mechanic to get the rest of the car fixed, everything outside of the transmission and I said, “Yes, to get it fixed correctly.”

    He got upset over that, then he proceeded to go on about how his service shop fixed many axles and disagreed with my answer about the boot not causing the axle to break or the leaking fluid damaging the shocks. He got upset over just fixing the transmission and he got so loud I had to move the phone from my ear and he went on and on about me not allowing anyone to talk because I was interrupting everyone that was talking to me as I sat there on the phone not talking but listening to him raise his voice to me. And basically in a round-about way, he told me to come and get my piece of ** car not in those words but in a round-about way out of his shop. And I said, “Do I need to get a lawyer in order to settle this?” And he said, “Go ahead, if that is what you need to do.” He continued to talk to me in a very loud voice, and several people around me heard him from my phone. I proceeded to hang up the phone. I just want them to fix what they caused more damage to my car because they did not catch the breakdowns of my daughter’s car in October. If the issues were caught, I would not have $1100 worth of repairs.

    Thanks for your vote!

    Reviewed Jan. 30, 2013

    I have a 2012 Mazda 3 Sport SkyActiv with a 6-Speed Manual Transmission. This is a great car except for a fault in the manual transmission. At times, when shifting from 3rd to 4th gear or downshifting between the same gears, there is a significant power surge. When this occurs, I need to engage the clutch quickly to bring the RPMs down. This event occurs completely randomly and I cannot replicate it at all. Sometimes, it will occur a few times a week; at other times, it's once every 2-3 weeks. I have been driving manual transmissions for 34 years and have never experienced this before. From reading online forums on this topic, many other people are experiencing the same issue.

    Thanks for your vote!
    Customer ServiceCoverage

    Reviewed Jan. 9, 2013

    I bought a Mazda3 model 2010 one year and a half ago and it's still under warranty. Still under warranty since months ago, we found a strange shape in the car's front wheels bottom cover, half part of the two Cartier cover of both wheels. When we returned to the dealer to find out the reason, it was missing half of each carteiras presuming they were released from the sewing thread while driving (traveling) and nobody noticed. This cannot be happening unless it's their fault in connecting them by the factory. The discussion with the dealer went to no avail. Also, the rubber steering wheel is cracked so he took photos and said, "We will send to the factory," to get me a new one. This took 6 months with no answer. Please reply to replace them.

    Thanks for your vote!

    Reviewed Dec. 21, 2012

    I have a 2010 Mazda 3 and three sets of tires already changed. Mazda service center in Redlands, CA was not helpful at all in solving the uneven wear tire problems. They said Mazda 3 is a sports car so the uneven wear of the tires is a normal thing. Changing three sets of tires in two years is a normal thing really!

    Thanks for your vote!
    Coverage

    Reviewed Nov. 28, 2012

    Mazda does not honor their 5 yr/60,000 warranty - My daughter’s car stopped at 54,000 miles and they claimed that she had water in the motor. It has not rained for 7 plus days in Huntsville, AL, and she does not even know how to open the hood. Can you not drive a Mazda in the rain anyway? How could water get in a motor? Mazda said they would not honor the warranty, that it should be an insurance claim for Mother Nature. We know very well that she was not in water. This would not be fair to ask for insurance. A defect is a defect. They should not advertise if they are not going to honor. We know very well that my daughter was not in water that day and they were saying it would have been something that would have happened immediately after she went into the water. She was on her way home from college - not out mudding in her Mazda 3!

    Thanks for your vote!
    Price

    Reviewed Nov. 25, 2012

    Today is the 6th time that I have a flat tire because of a problem with the valves. The repair will once again be expensive and take a day. I have lost days of work because of this recurring problem and today is especially galling because we have to go to my son's engagement party. All 4 valves have been replaced and I am on the second round. This is a Mazda 3 from 2008 and is otherwise a good car, but I am always afraid the tire light will light up unexpectedly.

    Thanks for your vote!

    Reviewed Nov. 14, 2012

    I was involved in a 3-car accident and was hit from the rear. With the impact, I was forced into the rear of a Ford Explorer and my car was considerably damaged. Thankfully I was ok and was able to walk down the aisle 3 days later for my wedding, but my complaint was that the air bag did not deploy on impact when hit in the rear at 50mph and I was at a dead stop. I put my arms up to protect my face expecting my airbag to deploy and it did not. I now see that numerous Mazda 3's are experiencing the same exact defect and still no recall has been made on this lifesaving device.

    Problem #2: When my car hit 70,000 miles and was very well-maintained and regularly and faithfully, at every 3500 miles, oil changed, my overheating sensor and my thermostat both went at the exact same time. In seconds, my car shut off without warning. My mechanic was in shock and my engine was killed. I was forced to have another motor put in my 2 1/2 yr. old Mazda at my full expense. Problem #3: My airbag lights are now staying on all the time. Both bags are now off. Yet I see this is another item that many Mazda owners are experiencing and again, no recall. I do not want to be a statistic, but fear in time there will be a bad accident involving a Mazda and then something might be done and these Mazda’s will be recalled and repaired.

    I always loved my Mazda and two family members have purchased one through my ravings. Now, I am seeing more and more problems with mine and I just want it fixed so it will be a safe and dependable car to drive. I love the gas mileage, but please issue recalls to protect innocent lives and end these expensive repairs that are not our fault.

    Thanks for your vote!
    Coverage

    Reviewed Sept. 19, 2012

    Let me start off by saying I have owned 4 other cars previous to my current 2011 Mazda 3 (purchased new) and have never had any issues with paint. I understand that your car can get hit with rocks and whatnot from driving with possible chips in the paint as a result. Looking beyond all of those chips, which this car seems to get more than any other car that I have owned or seen for that matter, there is a spot about the size of a quarter above the driver's side back roof where the paint is peeling off. This car is not even two years old and well under the mileage for the bumper to bumper warranty, so I figured it should be covered.

    When I brought it to the dealer, they told me they are not responsible for the repairs since it's not a default in the paint itself. So Mazda will not stand behind its paint job? I can't wait to see what would happen if I had a bigger issue and how they would get out of fixing that. I currently own two Mazdas, but not for long! I have full intention of trading in both of my Mazdas and get something else after this. I have read of others complaining about the paint/paint job used by Mazda.

    Thanks for your vote!
    Customer ServiceStaff

    Reviewed Aug. 22, 2012

    I had purchased a Mazda 6 2010 on September 28, 2009. I'm very pleased with the Mazda vehicles. I had them in the past and I had no problems with the previous vehicles except this one, and I have never seen anything like this before. My finger will sink into the dash board due to the heat temperature. I'm not pleased with this condition. I had purchased a $2100.00 vehicle. I hope this could get resolved in a timely manner.

    I had made several attempts to visit the service center when the vehicle was in warranty. I had spoken to Amos ** who is the assistant service manager which he had stated he could not authorize to write a repair order concerning the peeling on my dash board and that he wasn't able to do anything for me. He had explained to me that I need to talk to Service Director ** at Gunther Mazda 441 location in South Florida where the vehicle was purchased.

    So, I called ** explained to him I was there before the warranty expired and was told he wasn't in when I arrived. I did meet with him on Friday, 17th of August. He in fact indicated to me that the Mazda 3 is having a dashboard problem. He had taken a picture of my dashboard to send over to a consulting specialist. He told me it may take a long time to get back with me and Mazda Consulting would make that decision if their willing to goodwill it. He never bothered to do a written repair order. I hope that Mazda will consider and do what’s right and fix the problem at no cost to the customer.

    Thanks for your vote!
    Price

    Reviewed Aug. 8, 2012

    I have a 2008 Mazda 3. I love my car, I am good to my car and I take great care of my car. So I took my car in because it was giving me trouble going up the hill. I was told that I need a new transmission. I asked if it was my fault, he said no, that it just happened, and that it was going to cost me $3,400. I can't believe that. I have 108,000 miles. I bought an extended warranty which is 7 years or 100,000 miles. Well guess what, I have 108,000 and they would not help me. I am a one-woman band, don't make that much, have a home and can't afford to buy a new car. So what do I do? Please help.

    Thanks for your vote!
    CoveragePrice

    Reviewed May 29, 2012

    After reviewing all of the online complaints about premature clutch failure on the 2010 Mazda 3 and my son being stranded in Los Angeles (from Mobile, AL), I want to make a written complaint about a faulty clutch that is supposedly not covered under warranty. This will cost over one thousand dollars for a car purchased only a year and a half ago. There should be a recall and all owners should be fully compensated.

    Thanks for your vote!

    Reviewed April 20, 2012

    I went to have my 2010 Mazda3 inspected and the car dealership would not pass it because of a broken seat caused by faulty welding on the manufacturer's part. Because I was over the 36,000 and under the 3 years, they declined to fix the seat unless I paid an additional $750 (not happening). I took the vehicle to another mechanic and he told me that it was faulty welding. I contacted the main office of Mazda and once again because I was over the 36,000 and under the 3 years, they also could do nothing. I have never in all my years of purchasing cars (and this is the first for a Mazda), I have never had a seat break. In fact, the seat is fine; it is the track it slides on. So now we are at a dilemma. I believe they should fix the track and not charge me $750 for a seat. This should have been a fairly easy solution rather than making the consumer angry. This car is only two years old. I believe they should fix it and stand by their product.

    Thanks for your vote!
    Price

    Reviewed March 19, 2012

    I thought I got a good deal when I bought a 2007 Mazda 3 with only 40,000 miles on it last year. I have a long commute, so I have put 35,000 miles on this car in the past year. Dashboard lights starting coming on, so I took it to a dealer. I need a new transmission, power steering pump, a new coil, and an engine mount is cracked. Repairs will cost $6,220—more than the blue book value. This is the worst car I've ever owned. I am disgusted with Mazda.

    Thanks for your vote!

    Reviewed Jan. 19, 2012

    Battery that came with Mazda3 failed after 18 months. Replacement battery is failing after 6 months. It's my belief there is something in the Mazda3's with keyless start/entry that causes the batteries to fail prematurely.

    Thanks for your vote!

    Reviewed Jan. 11, 2012

    I purchased a new 2007 Mazda 3i. At 48,000 miles, I had to replace the front struts $250.00 (I replaced myself). At 49,000 miles, I heard a squeak when the clutch was engaged. Mazda completed a $120.00 diagnostic test, only to tell me that the throw-out bearing (clutch) is going bad and needed to be replaced ($1300.00 estimate). Now, at 53,000 miles, the number 3 top motor mount is leaking and is broken ($245.00 estimate). This is ridiculous! In addition, the powertrain warranty expired Oct. 2011 (two months ago). I have never in my life owned a vehicle with this mileage and this many issues! I plan on fixing this car and selling it as soon as possible before anything else goes wrong. I can honestly say, "I will never own another Mazda vehicle!"

    Thanks for your vote!

    Reviewed Dec. 13, 2011

    I've owned 6 Mazdas since 1978. So when it was time to purchase my first new car in 19 years, I made sure it was a Mazda. My 2007 Mazda 3 began to have a cabin odor at about 19,000 miles. I mentioned it to the dealer during a service visit, and they said it maybe due to the cabin air filter that needs to be changed (?), but usually not until 30,000miles. At 25,000 miles the odor permeated anything, and anyone that came in contact with the car interior. Based on the dealers comment, I had the seats and carpet steam cleaned, and used deodorizers, and ultimately resorted to driving with the windows open, if the air conditioner or heater was on. Not able to stand it any longer, I had the cabin air filter changed (something I've never had to do for a car, and I'm in my mid 50's) at 35,000 miles.

    It was with great anticipation that I turned on the air when leaving the dealership only to be blasted with the same smell. Further convinced that it was something inside the car, I began another round of cleaning and deodorizing, and had to replace several purses that became contaminated with the smell, after sitting in the car. I became suspicious that the cabin air filter had actually not been changed and took the car to a local reputable mechanic that I've done business with (successfully) for the last 15 years. Though the car only had 45,000 miles on it (only 10,000 on the "new" cabin filter, I asked the mechanic to replace the filter. I could sense he was "entertaining" my concerns until he pulled out the "new" cabin air filter. He displayed it to me and called over the other employees who were shocked when they were shown the receipt where I paid for it to be changed just 10,000 miles ago. The filters were covered in mold stains and debris, and it was clear they'd either never been changed, or the system is so compromised that it deteriorated the filters in 1/3 the time.

    I took the bagged filters directly to the dealer and lodged my complaint (with the new filters in the odor coming from the air and heat was the proverbial "breath of fresh air" that I'd not experienced since the car had 10k miles on it). The car was not inspected, nor was there an offer to do so. The dealer insisted that the filters had been changed yet told me he'd "cut a check" to refund me the cost of the "installation" that was done 10K miles ago (I have not cashed the check). It was only a short reprieve from the odor, as the interior of the vehicle is completely compromised. The odor in the upholstery and carpeting is recirculated through the system and everything that comes in contact with the car still has a musty odor.

    Though Mazda has had other models with bacteria problem, their position is "not with this model". I called the dealer and advised him that I intended to call the corporation, and asked if he had any other recommendations. He did not. I buy Mazdas, and have recommended Mazdas (my mother and sister both purchased Mazdas on my glowing reports), as they are usually problem free for many years, and the dealers have been responsive and trustworthy. Apparently times have changed. Because of Mazda's inaction and deceit, I have a car with only 54,000 miles on it, and I can't use for trips and can't sell. Mazda's position? Take it to a different dealer, and "oh, it's out of warranty".

    Thanks for your vote!

    Reviewed Nov. 5, 2011

    I bought a new 06 Mazda 3. The only complaint I have had is that it eats the inside edge of the tires. I have a work vehicle, so my Mazda is not my daily driver. With 93000 miles on it, I am having to replace the transmission. I have treated my car well and have maintained it. I am disappointed in the lack of quality of this product and it looks to be a common issue.

    Thanks for your vote!
    Customer ServiceCoveragePunctuality & SpeedStaffReliability

    Reviewed Oct. 12, 2011

    My 2008 Mazda 3 2.3L bought brand new 2/10 of a mile before test drive. In 08 Oct 2011, my motor was making a funny noise so I checked the oil and it ended up being three quarts low of oil. I filled it up but it continued to make noise so I took the car to the dealership where it was bought and under warranty. I asked them why the oil light never came on. I have still yet to get an answer about that and it's been five days.

    They had me get all the receipts for service records and I ended up being around 800 miles over due on one of the oil changes and on my current one, I was roughly 1,140 miles or so. I was thinking this was fine due to my owners manual saying the oil needs to be changed every 7500 miles. I assumed that they left a grace period for busy work schedules and time to make appointments around hectic schedules. So because of these overage of miles between the two oil change stated above, they (Mazda) said that the oil light that never went off was irrelevant since I was over due on the two oil changes stated earlier.

    My argument is that my windshield wipers come on the second a rain drop hits the car. I have a sensor that tells me when my front right tire is low 5 p.s.i., or when I get sideways around a corner in bad weather, my car automatically stops me from spinning out of control. But somehow when I'm three quarts low of oil and Ive missed an oil change for a week or two, my oil light sensor does not come on. How is that irrelevant to my motor throwing a rod due to lack of oil? Are they saying if I would have gotten an oil change, then it would have worked?

    Meanwhile, I have a rental car that I was under the impression it would be covered by warranty but since in this instance or two, I have gone past the mileage between oil changes they won't even cover my rental. And they seem like they are trained or have dealt with this problem many times with the way they avoided and changed the subject every time I brought up the oil sensor.

    Is there going to be a recall on this sensor for the oil? If you look at the big picture of service records, I've actually had more oil changes than necessary because 7500 x 7 oil changes = 52,500 and my car is around 49,500 give or take. Not to mention I paid extra for the better oil. But still the oil sensor is irrelevant to what has happened.

    This has happened to many other people, treated and dealt with in the same way every time. With Twitter, Facebook, MySpace blogs rants and raves, Yelp and every other way to get your voice heard, you would think that the people who obviously care about there cars and did not neglect their cars would help those in need. If they did, that person would for sure tell everyone looking for a car that they know a dealership with a reliable staff and helpful service department and a warranty that will cover you when you really need them.

    Mazda of Everett would be a top recommendation but when treated like I just bought a $26,000 car, to be treated like ** and blow the motor, I will let everyone know how they treat the people that make their paychecks. They will just rip up your warranty and kick you while you are down and stick you with the bill for everything because nothing can be relevant if you got caught up and were a little late on you oil change. Because by doing that, nothing will have to work the way it should because this is their out.

    I will never buy Mazda again. Where is the class action lawsuit? Where is the recall on the oil sensor that does not light up when the engine is 3 quarts low? Where did the three quarts of oil even go? Did Mazda accidentally not put enough in, just like I accidentally was a little late servicing my engine?

    But everything is irrelevant except the fact that you were late changing your top shelf oil and that you have been screwed by your local Mazda dealer.

    Thanks for your vote!

    Reviewed Oct. 7, 2011

    My 2005 Mazda 3 has been having problems since I got it new--electrical, windows, stalling, etc. I am spending all that money getting it fixed.

    Thanks for your vote!

    Reviewed Sept. 28, 2011

    I purchased a "Certified Pre-Owned" 2008 Mazda 3 in March of 2010 and realized soon after that there was paint peeling on the front bumper of the car. Now, a year later, there is paint peeling on the front bumper, the back bumper, and noticeable fading on the back bumper.

    My car has 33,000 miles on it and is only a little over 3 years old! It's ridiculous!

    Thanks for your vote!
    Customer Service

    Reviewed Sept. 21, 2011

    I bought a 2005 Mazda 3 GT in September 2009. In August 2010, Petro Canada Mechanic examined it. They said the timing chain jumped and damaged the pistons. I called Mazda Canada to complain, and I was told to take the car to the Mazda dealership. They claimed it was because there was no oil. I bought another Mazda motor from Bobyline wrecking yard with a warranty, and the motor is constantly leaking oil from the seals. They won't fix the motor. I have spent a lot of money on this car, and it still runs like crap. As I understand there is a huge problem with the 2.3L Mazda motors, and Mazda will not fix it.

    Thanks for your vote!

    Reviewed Sept. 21, 2011

    My dad got me a Mazda 3 2005 new when they came out before he died. Ever since then I had to keep bringing it in for some kind of repair because it has been faulty since I bought it. I have been very safe with it too, now there's some kind of tin foil and paper coming under the car and the suspension and steering always seemed off and getting worse even though I drive within limit and don't zigzag in traffic or anything.

    Thanks for your vote!

    Reviewed Aug. 11, 2011

    I purchased a new Mazda 3. All of these models are supposed to come with the keyless remote flip key. Mine does not. I was told by several employees at this dealership that it does have the remotes. I never received them.

    I complained to Mazda USA. They also said that the car comes with the remote. A few days after, they came back and said I needed to talk to the dealership again. I did. No result. I am paying a very high price for the financing of this car and I feel cheated! If it was a car from back in the 1960's, I would understand. But a 2011 model?

    Thanks for your vote!

    Reviewed Aug. 1, 2011

    I have a 2005 Mazda 3, 2.3L hatch with 95,000 miles on it. I’m not a racer, I’m a diligent driver who enjoys driving what used to be a nice inexpensive car. My transmission has failed. I now only have 1st and 3rd gear available to use to drive to shop. I talked to a Mazda mechanic who told me quite frankly, "Due to the mileage, Mazda will do nothing to repair this transmission". Gee, nice to see a company stand behind its product.

    Oh, by the way, I’m 46 years old, have over 30 years of licensed driving experience and about 6 years beyond that driving on a farm. Never have I burned out a transmission before. I've even been driving a car older than I am for 10 years with a V8 engine, and the transmission is still strong. Mazda has obviously built an inferior transmission (due to the number of complaints found online at any given time). Like I said, I’m a good driver, a gentle driver and I don’t "get on it" while driving.

    Thanks for your vote!

    Reviewed April 28, 2011

    A 2008 Mazda 3 was purchased brand new for my son while attending college. He is now a Military Officer on active duty. The car was purchased from Luther Mazda in Minneapolis, MN. Since the purchase, the car has been garaged the entire time my son owned it, except over the last several months while he was living in Washington D.C. He went to school in San Diego where there was harsh weather during most of the car’s use.

    He was transferred to Pittsburgh, PA for military school and one day noticed very bad discoloration of the paint on the hood, roof, and right hand side of the vehicle. The car is still under the original Manufacturer’s warranty. We took pictures of the paint defect which was later sent to the Mazda Corporation. My son took it to a Mazda dealership where he was living and was told it would not be covered under warranty because they felt the car had been repainted. My son told them that not only did it never get repainted, but since acquisition it had only been out of the garage for several months (while he was driving to his new assignment in the military). They promptly told him to get out and they would not do anything for him. His contact was with the dealership’s body shop manager.

    We went back and contacted the dealership who we purchased it from in Minneapolis who put us in contact with the District 4 Service Manager. We sent the pictures to him via e-mail. The original dealership told us the car could not have been repainted prior to purchase since they only had the car in inventory for one day before they sold it to us. He sent me documentation on this. He then emailed the pictures to the District 4 Service Manager out of Minneapolis, MN. The Service manager (who only had the pictures) told us that this was not a paint defect and it was caused by some "external condition". We asked what he meant by an "external condition". He told us that it was most likely some kind of acid or salt corrosion. We argued that a two year old car should not have this kind of paint damage from any external weather related condition like road salt. He told us he was sorry but Mazda would refuse to do anything about this under the warranty.

    We then went back and escalated this through the original Mazda dealership GM. He then referred us to the Mazda Corporate people in the Pittsburgh area. (Along with the pictures of the car) We were told that someone would actually inspect the vehicle out there, (where my son was now living) and they would contact my son to make arrangements for this. It took over 3 weeks of prodding to get them to call my son. The person finally left him a message but never left him his phone number to call back. We finally got the number and my son called him. He was also with Mazda Corporation. He told my son that he sided with the dealership in Pittsburgh who looked at the vehicle in Pittsburgh. He refused to look at the vehicle and made his decision based on only looking at the pictures that were sent to him.

    He told us that it was not a paint warranty issue and also told my son that he believed the car was repainted by my son. In fact he told my son that he was 100% sure the car had been repainted. He also told my son that, according to their records, the car had been brought in before for paint issues based upon their service records. My son asked for a copy of these records, (as he has been the only owner of the car) and had never brought it in for any paint related issues prior to this. He refused. He told my son that Mazda would not fix this under warranty. He refused to give us his full name, contact number or who his superiors were.

    I went back to the dealership we purchased the car from again and told them we would pursue legal action if Mazda didn't at least look at the vehicle from an impartial Mazda representative. We told him that if the car had been repainted, it could only have been repainted by either the dealership or by Mazda Corporation prior to us receiving it. He sent my email back to Mazda HQ again and we have heard from no one since then. This car has been meticulously taken care of. Either Mazda Corporation repainted this vehicle prior to delivery to the dealership, or has a serious paint defect that they refuse to stand behind the warranty.

    Mazda Corporation has refused to even physically look at the vehicle or give us any kind of consideration under the warranty. Mazda has many paint related complaints posted on the internet regarding premature corrosion issues. We also sent them this documentation. We are in the process of getting some independent assessments of the paint damage from neutral party body shops. Once we know what the damages are we plan to sue Mazda Corporation and the original dealership. We would also like to look at pursuing a class action and punitive damages.

    Thanks for your vote!

    Reviewed Sept. 23, 2010

    I got a Mazda 3 1996 and got 88,000 miles. I did regular service since I bought it and did not abuse all freeway miles. The motor started having a noise. The mechanic said the noise is not going to go away unless I change the motor. I did not expect that a car that is 4 years old will have a motor problem. A couple of mechanics told me the same, that these motors are not really good and have several cases (with less miles) when the motors had the same problem.

    Thanks for your vote!

    Reviewed Sept. 1, 2010

    I purchased a brand new 2007 Mazda 3 in May 2007. The car ran fine and I loved it. Around 45,000 miles, I noticed the car would make a slight jerk when shifting into 4th gear but no light or anything came on --up until about 2 weeks ago. My car is now at 103,000 miles and 2 weeks ago, the AT light came on and the car would not shift past 3rd gear. I took it into the dealership, in which the associate told me to prepare for the worst because he had seen this problem before and it usually ends with the tranny being replaced. So for $108, they diagnosed it as an internal transmission failure, but not exactly sure what is causing it and told me I have to replace the whole transmission for $2300. My extended warranty is up and now, I have to pay all expenses out of my pocket.

    After doing a lot of research, I see this problem with Mazda's transmissions are not rare but more common. I don't think Mazda is being fair by continuing to sell their vehicles knowing they have faulty transmissions. With these many problems, Mazda needs to do something about it. I am currently without a working vehicle. My Mazda was my way of getting to school everyday and taking my little ones to school as well. Since I am currently still making payments on my car, I am not able to save up the $2300 it's going to cost me to fix it. This has caused me to put my education on hold as I have to get me and my kids to and from school.

    Thanks for your vote!

    Reviewed April 28, 2010

    I have a 2004 Mazda 3 sedan. Several months ago, the transmission went out on it. Mazda has yet to recall it. I have looked online and noticed a lot of complaints about this transmission. I think Mazda knows it’s a piece of crap and just doesn’t want to own up to their mistakes. It cost me $1,900.00 for a rebuilt transmission and I’m very upset. I will never own another Mazda.

    Thanks for your vote!

    Reviewed Dec. 15, 2009

    My car is a 2009 so it's basically brand new. I got it in June. It had around 1,000 kms. on it when I got it. I have lost all faith in Mazda. Read this, it is quite interesting. Keep in mind that the car is a 2009 but now, the car makes a constant loud pig squeal. I took it in to the dealer and told them no lie, that this happened 6 times already & they don't know what the problem is. The side passenger mirror fell off hanging by wires. The original factory cushioning for the windshield is now showing on the front dash. The pass side window makes an annoying crackling sound when you turn it down.

    This car was poorly constructed. I want a new car but preferably not a Mazda. I had no major problems with my previous Mazda 3. I hate paying for a 2009 squealing machine. It was so embarrassing, so loud & the dealer wasn't telling me anything! I was not a happy customer.

    Thanks for your vote!

    Reviewed Sept. 15, 2009

    I bought the Mazda 3 new in 2005. The car has never been a good car; always causing me little problems. After 78k miles, the AC compressor quit. I purchased a new compressor from them for approx. $500.00. The new compressor broke after only being on the car for twenty minutes. That ruined my AC clutch. They now expect me to pay an additional $500.00 for an AC clutch that broke because of their defective part.

    Thanks for your vote!

    Reviewed Aug. 18, 2009

    In September of 2008, I bought a 2009 Mazda 3. When the temperature changed and it was starting to get warmer, I started to use my air conditioner - it soon started messing up. I would work all day and get into a "hot" car from being out in the sun all day. I would roll my windows down and turn my air conditioner on to cool it off. After rolling my windows up and the air conditioner still on cold (with the a/c light on, the inside air light on, and the temperature turned to cold) and 30 minutes into my driving, my air conditioner would start blowing warmer air (it felt like I turned my a/c off and rolled my windows down). Even the smell of it smelled like outside air.

    I would go for about a mile or so, and it would eventually go back to blowing cold air. The last time it did so, my car started making a loud noise from underneath the hood and when the air started blowing back to cold, the loud noise went away. I've taken it over to Moffitt Mazda several times for this problem. The first time, they told me there was no problem and that it was just because I had dark interior and it carried a lot of heat! The second time or third time, they changed the thermostat.

    After having it back for about a week or so, it started messing up again. I just took it back over there again on 8/17/09 to get the oil changed and tires rotated. And I mentioned the problem again to them about my air conditioner and they told me that they would look at it again. When I went to leave, they told me that they ordered a harness for it. I'm at the point to where I will not ever buy another Mazda if they do not fix the problem. It's a brand new car!

    Thanks for your vote!

    Reviewed May 5, 2009

    My 2003 Mazda 3 needs a new transmission! My car only has 35,000 miles! I could tell that the gears were not switching smoothly between 3rd and 4th gear, so I brought it in to find out the bad news. The mechanic didn't know why it happened. I had the transmission "flushed" at the 25,000-mile tune-up. So I got a "deal" when I only had to pay $1,200 for the new transmission. What a waste of money, and from what I'm reading on the internet, it happens a lot and Mazda doesn't do a thing about it!

    Thanks for your vote!

    Reviewed Dec. 23, 2008

    2004 Mazda 3, I bought the car used a few years ago with 19,000 miles. It shifted hard when I bought it and didn't want to shift into gear when it was cold. Took it Bommarito Mazda in South County... TWICE... They said it was fine. The car now has 43,000 miles and now that the warranty is over, the dealer says the tranny is toasted and needs to be replaced. I am 49 and do not abuse a transmission. This car barely gets driven 10,000 miles a year. If they had fixed it in the first place, it would be fine now.They will do me a favor and pay a third, leaving me to pay the other 2100. I still maintain if it had been fixed correctly the first 2 times, I wouldn't have the issue now. The woman who took my complaint wouldn't even call me back after I left numerous messages to see what I could have done. Just a blatant disregard for Mazda customers.

    It's the dead of winter with bad weather and I have to drive my other vehicle which is rear wheel drive. Scares the hell out of me every time I have to take that car out in the snow or ice. I hope I can stay safe until I get the front wheel drive car fixed. When winter is over, I will sell the unreliable piece of... Can't sell it now as it is. I am also going to have to pay to get the tranny fixed right at Christmas time, personal property tax time and real estate tax time to boot. I have always owned Japanese cars, but Mazda gives them all a bad name. I really believe a class action suit is what it will take. Even if Mazda fights, the press alone will make their sales dwindle and maybe they will start standing behind what they produce. There are plenty of pissed off Mazda owners out here that I am sure would join in, myself included. CLASS ACTION!!!

    Thanks for your vote!

    Reviewed Dec. 23, 2008

    2000 Mazda 3 - I bought the car used a few years ago with 19,000 miles. It shifted hard when I bought it and didn't want to shift into gear when it was cold. Took it Bommarito Mazda in South County...TWICE... They said it was fine. The car now has 43000 miles and now that the warranty is over, the dealer says the tranny is toasted and needs to be replaced. I am 49 and do not abuse a transmission. This car barely gets driven 10,000 miles a year. If they had fixed it in the first place, it would be fine now. They will do me a favor and pay a third, leaving me to pay the other $2100. I still maintain if it had been fixed correctly the first 2 times, I wouldn't have the issue now. The woman who took my complaint wouldn't even call me back after I left numerous messages to see what I could have done. Just a blatant disregard for Mazda customers. I really believe a class action suit is what it will take. Even if Mazda fights, the press alone will make their sales dwindle and maybe they will start standing behind what they produce. There are plenty of pissed off Mazda owners out here that I am sure would join in, myself included.

    Thanks for your vote!

    Reviewed Sept. 30, 2008

    I bought a new 2004 Mazda 3. After 88,000 miles the transmission is completely gone. I am still making payments on this vehicle....Now I find out that the transmission seems to be a problem with these vehicles. Mazda should do a recall on their transmissions.

    No car do drive....2500 to rebuile the transmission and I am still making payments in addition.

    Thanks for your vote!

    Reviewed Aug. 14, 2008

    Inferior Air Conditioning on Mazda 3 model.

    Car was unusable at ambient temperatures over 82F. Sat in garage all summer, except for nighttime use. Traded in when only a few months old at a financial loss.

    Thanks for your vote!

    Reviewed July 1, 2008

    We bought a new 2007 Mazda 3 from the dealership in November of 2006. There was 5 miles on the car when we purchased it and it still had the plastic on from shipping. We have had the oil changed and tires rotated on the car every 5,000 miles as warranty recommends since we bought the car. We took our car again this weekend to have the oil changed, at 29,000 miles and were told my the service technician that the two rear tires needed to be replaced due to inside wear on the tires. Since our car has an automatic low tire inflation button, and we check it regularly, there shouldn't be a problem since we have had them rotated regularly. We were told by the technician that since the way the suspension is on the car that the tires wear out on the inside and we were lucky to get 29,000 miles out of the tires as others have had to replace them before 20,000 miles. I have never heard of needing to replace tires on a car at 29,000 miles in my life. Tires used to be good for a minimum of 60,000 miles and on some 100,000 miles. As this car isn't even 2 years old and hasn't exhausted the manufacturers warranty I am completely confused as to why the tires need to be replaced. I have sent a email to Mazda headquarters concerning this incident but have not received a response. If the tires are wearing irregularly due to the suspension problem, it sounds like a car mechanical problem, not an ownership negligence problem.

    Thanks for your vote!

    Reviewed May 1, 2008

    In September of 2004, I purchased a brand new Mazda 3s with the extended warranty plan covering me for 7yr/100k miles (which when sold to me was quoted as 10yr/100k). Over the past few years I have taken the car in a couple of times for minor repairs that arose. At the end of March of this year, I was out of town on business and my husband decided to drive my car to go pick up our children from daycare. While leaving from the daycare, he heard the car start to make this loud repeated sound coming from under the hood of the car. Since my husband is pretty good at working on cars, he pulled over and took a look under the hood. His thought was there must be a broken belt somewhere but he saw nothing. So he called the dealership which was about two miles away and told them what was happening. Since the car was still driving and he was so close, they told him to drive it in.

    They notice right away the car is almost completely out of oil. This seems impossible since the car is serviced with synthetic oil and is maintained regularly. After further investigation by the dealership they determined the cause of the oil leak was a crack in the canister that houses the oil filter. This was not a small leak. When they put oil in it was pretty much flowing out. We had never had an oil leak in our driveway so we must have been somewhere other than home when the crack and drainage occurred.

    The dealership continued to try and work with the warranty people. They sent out their 3rd party investigator who looked at the car and took pictures. They went back and forth for awhile as to whether or not they were going to cover this. They told the dealership that the car would need a "crank kit (sp)" in order to be fixed. The dealership argued that they felt the entire motor needed to be replaced, rather than given a temporary fix.

    The warranty people said that in order to prove this, the dealership would need to tear apart the rest of the motor (this was quoted to us as our expense until warranty approved payment, and this would require approx 20hrs of work at 95 pr hr). Once the motor was fully exposed, they would send out another investigator and see if they agreed that the motor was in need of full replacement. Knowing that there is not always immediate and obvious damage to a motor, and feeling like it was not our responsibility to figure out what all needed to be replaced at this point- we declined to have this done and said we would accept the crank kit as their initial fix and see if that worked. If it did not work, we would go from there.

    The dealership went on to order the kit and days before it was going to be installed, the person working for the warranty group asked the service person assigned to our car at the dealership to open this top section of the engine (excuse the lack of terminology but I don't know all the technical terms) and if there were metal shavings in there then he would know that the entire engine did need to be replaced. So they went ahead and did this and that is exactly what they found. So the warranty people sent out another investigator to take more pictures. The next day they contacted the dealership and said they were fully denying the claim at this point.

    Now stating that the damage to the motor was due to oil starvation and that there was service bulletin that had gone out stating that if you over torque you can crack the canister. The service person from the dealership tells this warranty person that this is not the case in this situation. The oil was changed in late December and this occurred in late March. If this crack was caused due to being over torqued it would have happened sooner. He questioned as to why were back to cause of failure, when they had already passed that process and were on to what needed to be repaired.

    The warranty person then stated that he had to review it with a supervisor and that he would be in contact with the dealership again within 24 hours. KEEP IN MIND AT THIS POINT I HAVE BEEN OUT OF A CAR FOR ALMOST 5 WEEKS WITH ONLY 6 DAYS OF RENTAL COVERAGE IF THIS CLAIM IS APPROVED. The next day the call the dealership back and tell them that they will cover $2357.03 of the engine repair (approx $8,000.00) because they feel that we knew something was wrong with the car and continued to drive it which caused the damage to the engine.

    I called the supervisor at the warranty department myself and of course he would not take my call until her reviewed the 500 lines of my claim. When he called me back I said to him, just to be sure, you are denying full payment of my claim because you believe that we knew something was wrong with the car and continued to drive it? He said yes because that is what the oil shavings show us is that it was driven when there was damage. I told him that we had no idea something was wrong with the car and if we had, we would have brought it in for repair right away as we have done in the past.

    There would be no reason to wait since we have this extended warranty. He then asked me if we had the car towed to the dealership when it broke down. I said that no my husband pulled over and called the dealership but he was only two miles away and they told him to bring it in. He "well, if you would have had it towed it would really have helped your case." I then asked him if he was saying that the 2 miles my husband drove to the dealership cause this damage to the engine- he wouldn't give me an answer- just repeated again that if we had towed it to the dealer it would have helped our case.

    Looking for help now. I either have to pay the remainder of the 6k to have the car repaired or pay for the 6 days of the rental car I had ($180) plus the fees for the dealership investigating and take my car home without a working engine. I have a loaner car from the dealership right now but I have a feeling they will call me today and ask for it back until this is resolved. I work full time, have two children and my husband works full time 12 a day and his schedule rotates every week from days to nights. It is IMPOSSIBLE for us to car pool. Suggestions? I have been without a car for 5 weeks now. I am continuing to make payments on a car I can not drive.

    Thanks for your vote!

    Reviewed Feb. 12, 2008

    I purchased brand new Mazda 3 October 26, 2007. At first I did have problems getting the car. It was delivered to some other dealership, then my dealership could not find where the car was, it took an extra two weeks on top of the four or five weeks to get the colour I wanted. Three months after driving this car it bursts into flames in my own driveway while we are sleeping.My 20 year old son plays hockey every Sunday, his game was 9:00 PM, he returned at 10:30 PM pulled in the driveway just like usual took hockey things out of the car and locked it, know one else went out or moved the car the rest of the night. We were watching the highlights of the superbowl on TV went to bed at 12:15AM February 4th (happens to be my birthday) At 12:30 AM only fifteen minutes later but two hours after the car had been parked for the night it burst into flames.

    The only reason we knew this was one of my neighbors had their car get stuck in the snow and were in front of my house at the time, The called the fire department and rang our door violently. fortunately we had a fire extinguisher close by and put the fire out before it spread. The fire department came and said this was not vandalism, it started in the passenger rear reversing light, shorted out and blew out the drivers reversing light which caught fire. The car is still at Mazda where they are deciding who is at fault. I told My insurance adjuster if they even try to blame this on this on me I will plaster them across the 6:00 news before I sew them. Do you know of anyone else with Mazda 3 problems as I think they are going to try and make me keep the car since the damage did not total the car. I also feel for the family who lost their home and animals because if circumstances were a bit different I could also be homeless or loss of life.

    Thanks for your vote!

    Reviewed Jan. 10, 2008

    I purchased my 2004 Mazda 3 October 29th 2004 as a leftover. It had 43 miles on it when I drove it off the lot. I had no problems what-so-ever until about 47k when my transmission failed!! This is an automatic that is driven with care and not abused. Luckily it was covered under Warranty. One month later- Transmission Failure- replaced again under warranty!! I am now at about 69,500 and my ENGINE SIEZED!!!!! This is NOT covered under Warranty and of course Mazda wont touch it. I now have to pay to replace an engine 100% out of pocket... Okay, I understand the Warranty thing, but a car should by no means have its transmission replaced twice and an engine replacement within 150k let alone under 70k.

    I

    Thanks for your vote!

    Reviewed Oct. 30, 2007

    I have owned a Mazda 3 since May of 2005. I have the Mazda 3s, sometime ago my airbag light started coming on. It would be on for a few days and then go off again. I called and asked the dealer about it and they said that they could only diagnose it if the light was on, but assured me that it was nothing. Anyhow, 3 days ago I was involved in a roll over accident and not one of my airbags deployed. 90% of the reason that I purchased this car was because of the safety features of the vehicle (i.e. Front and side impact air bags as well as curtain air bags).

    Thanks for your vote!

    Reviewed Aug. 22, 2007

    I took my 2005 Mazda 3 to get an oil change and routine 'check up,' and the Mazda service associate called to notify me that my rear brakes were due for a change. I agreed to the service and a few hours later picked up my car. My car was not washed, which surprised me since all of the Mazda car dealers I have visited have always washed my car. I didn't mind, I thought that this was probably the way the did things around there.

    I drive off and then a few days later notice that my brakes are making thumping sound. The thumping sound turns into a grinding sound. I take my car back to the dealer exactly one week later. They take about 2 to 3 hours to investigate and find that nothing is wrong. The service associate stated that new brakes make sounds in the beginning and they eventually go away. I drive off thinking this will eventually fade. Two weeks later, the grinding, thumping sound becomes louder. I drive back to the dealer for the 3rd time on a Saturday morning and the associate notes that this dealer only has apprentices that work the weekend and they are half-staffed. He suggested I come on Mon.-Fri. between 8 a.m. and 5 p.m.

    I ask my husband to take the day off of work to bring my car in since I can't take time off at the time. The car is brought to the dealers at 8 a.m. on a Thursday morning. Almost 4 hours later, the servicing associate states that the brake pads were cracked, thus causing a groove in the brake discs. The technician replaced the brake pads and had to 'sand out' the groove on the disc. After waiting another hour for the paper work that never arrives, the car is ready to drive off in. However, the sound recurs. About one week later, the grinding, thumping sound is back. I am in the process of trying to ask for a full refund if they cannot fix it. The associates were not attentive at all. I have had to visit this dealer about 4 times already and my problem, which wasn't there to begin with, is still not fixed. DO NOT take your car to get serviced at Mazda of Orange.

    Their service takes too long, is expensive, and the staff is unprofessional. In addition, they offer life time warranties on the brakes but cannot even replace them properly and do not care about the consumer.

    Thanks for your vote!

    Reviewed June 18, 2007

    I own a 2006 Mazda 3 with only 17000 miles. The car just stopped moving with no prior indication of a problem. Local Mazda dealership told me it was the clutch and it was not covered under the warranty because it was a wear item. Accused us of tearing it up by driving it hard. Mechanic told me he figured a teenager drove the car. I am a 37 year old father of 2 and was insulted that I was acussed of not being able to drive a standard transmission. Cost of repair $900 - $1500 dollars to get my NEW car back on the road.

    Thanks for your vote!

    Reviewed April 28, 2007

    I was in an accident in a 2006 Mazda 3. I was backing out of a parking space making room for a truck to exit the parking lot. My car would not stop when I put on the brakes and the car started to hit a pole so I put the car in drive and it lunged forward into the same path in the parking lot, drove through the parking space I was in and through the window of a convenience store and into the beverage cooler. The accident was during my working hours and I was seen by a Workman's Comp clinic. The Doctor treated my right foot for strain and plantar faciitis; therefore I feel that it is clear that my foot was strained from extreme presser on the brake. My insurance company Geico, totaled the car and claimed that there was nothing wrong with the accelerator. They did not examine the throttle positioning sensor or any other possibilities for malfunction. I am still suffering repercussions, physically and financially. Mazda claims that they have no recalls or similar problems with the 2006 Mazda 3.

    Thanks for your vote!

    Reviewed Jan. 30, 2007

    I got the vehicle with 219 miles on it, as it came from out of state. since purchase i have put a total of 742 miles on the vehicle. I have put a total of 45.6 gallons of gas in the car. This is an average of 16.2 miles per gallon. When i bought the car gas mileage was a huge factor in the purchase. I was promised between 26 to 34 miles per gallon depending on my driving.

    I have driven the vehicle in every possible manner of driving. slow. fast. automatic only. 74.5 miles 5.1 gal=14.6 mpg manual only. 94.8 miles 5.6 gal=16.9 mpg automatic manual mixed. 136.5 miles 9.0 gal=15.1 mpg city only. 111.0 miles 7.1 gal=15.6 mpg highway only. 105.0 miles 5.5 gal=19.1 mpg in each case i completely gased up and then drove it in that manner. All total i have driven the car in every possible way.

    Now Carson City Mazda wants me to let them drive my car and run one tank of gas using their driver. The problem i have with this is this. I asked them,what if the car still gets 16.0 miles to the gallon with your driver, what then? The answer was we will deal with that then.

    I think that if i let them put another 300 miles on my car then i will be stuck with a car that gets 16.0 miles to the gallon but now has 300 more miles on it. I love my mazda 3. I just cannot live with 16.0 miles per gallon on a car i bought with the promise of 26 to 34 miles per gallon. What are my options? please help me. sincerely: william **

    Thanks for your vote!

    Reviewed Oct. 6, 2006

    In June 2004, I began leasing a Mazda 3 5-door hatchback with manual transmission. I loved the car and had no problems with it until early Oct. 2006 when the clutch went with only 34,000 miles on the vehicle. I was told that since the clutch is a normal wear and tear item that it was no longer under warranty, and I would have to pay the cost for repair. There was no effort on Mazda's part to help me out and the company would in no way acknowledge that there might have been a problem and basically implied that I had abused the car. I've driven standard cars (many of which had thousands of miles on them) for 20 years and never blown out a clutch so to say that I am responsible for this is ridiculous and insulting. I've also noticed that there are many Mazda forums online that talk about all of the problems the company has had with clutches and transmissions over the years.

    Thanks for your vote!
    Loading more reviews...

    Mazda 3 Company Information

    Company Name:
    Mazda 3
    Website:
    www.mazdausa.com