Current Events in March 2004

Browse Current Events by year

2004

Browse Current Events by month

Get trending consumer news and recalls

    By entering your email, you agree to sign up for consumer news, tips and giveaways from ConsumerAffairs. Unsubscribe at any time.

    Thanks for subscribing.

    You have successfully subscribed to our newsletter! Enjoy reading our tips and recommendations.

    Dallas to Equip Ford Police Cars with Fire Suppressant

    Says Officer Safety Will Not Be Left to "Sheer Luck"

    Dallas officials say they will install fire suppressant technology on the City's Ford Crown Victoria police cars and seek reimbursement from the Ford Motor Company, saying they will not leave the safety of police officers to chance.

    "Dallas' Ford police cars have been involved in a number of high-speed rear crashes both before and after the tragic death of Officer Patrick Metzler in October 2002. An accident on Feb. 8, which involved six people, resulted in a massive gasoline spill that had to be mopped out of gutters by fire fighters," said City Attorney Madeleine Johnson.

    "Any rear-end crash to a Ford police car holds the potential to create a fireball that could burn police officers and bystanders to death," she said. "Call it sheer luck - or a miracle, if you will - but that night there was no spark to ignite the fuel. The next accident could be different. We cannot leave the safety of Dallas police and its citizens to luck."

    Dallas will begin retrofitting 775 active duty Ford Crown Victorias and retired police vehicles used by civilian employees by the end of the month, she said. The work should take about 30 days and cost the city about $271,000, or about $350 per car.

    Dallas will buy a fire suppression product that uses a plastic panel filled with six pounds of fire suppression powder, which completely covers the rear of the fuel tank, between the tank and the rear axle. In a rear crash, the axle or other components would shatter the panel, releasing a cloud of powder which would mix with any fumes from gasoline leaking from the tank. The powder makes it impossible for any fumes to ignite.

    The technology is similar to that used by the military and in racing cars to prevent fires in the event of crashes.

    The city will ask Ford to reimburse the money as a necessary safety retrofit, Johnson said.

    "We continue to believe that Ford has a duty as the nation's primary supplier of police cars to manufacture them in such a way as to make them safe for routine police work, a large part of which puts them on roadways where they are targets for high speed vehicles," Johnson said.

    Ford's attempt to shore up fuel tank protection by shielding certain components that could be puncture sources in crashes does not offer enough protection, Johnson added. Two Dallas police cars involved in high-speed, rear-end crashes resulting in fire or gasoline spills since the death of Officer Metzler in Oct. 2002, were equipped with Ford shields, she noted.

    An analysis of the most recent crash on Feb. 8, showed two leak sources: around a valve at the top of the tank, and a puncture at the bottom of the tank that allowed the tank to drain completely. Firefighters had to use absorption equipment to mop the gutters of fuel.

    The analysis further showed that the puncture was caused by a bracket that covers one of the straps holding the fuel tank in place. The puncture occurred in an area of the tank not protected by Ford's retrofitted shield system.

    Last July, the City of Dallas ran its own safety tests of the Ford Crown Victoria, concluding Ford's second attempt at making the cars safer - a trunk lining to keep police equipment from puncturing the tank - created a whole new danger: the potential of massively splitting the fuel tank.

    Ford roundly criticized the methodology used in these tests, claiming its own testing showed the trunk liner and other safety improvements prevented punctures up to 75 mph. However, later deposition testimony in ongoing lawsuits revealed that Ford never actually performed fuel system integrity crash tests on the trunk liner.

    The City of Dallas is among dozens of cities and counties suing Ford over the safety of Crown Victoria police cars. An investigation in December by the Detroit Free Press found that 30 people, including 18 police officers, had died in fiery rear-impact crashes in the Crown Victoria.

    Since 1999, there have been at least four Dallas Police Department Ford Crown Victorias involved in high speed rear crashes, including the one that took the life of Officer Metzler on Oct. 23, 2002.

    Dallas to Equip Ford Police Cars with Fire Suppressant...

    Lasko Recalls Space Heaters

    March 4, 2004
    Lasko Products is recalling 186,000 space heaters. The power cord connection can overheat and cause the cord to separate from the space heater. This poses a fire, burn and shock hazard.

    Four consumers reported burned and detached power cords. No injuries reported.

    There are two types of heaters involved in this recall. The recalled model 5500 heater is an oscillating ceramic heater with dark grey vents surrounded by a bronze trim. The model number is located on a label under the round base. The Model 5700 heater is an oil filled radiator-type heater. The model number is located on a label on the side of the heater near the right front wheel. The name Lasko is printed near the top of both heaters.

    The heaters were sold by retailers such as Dollar General and Sams Club stores nationwide from July 2001 through December 2003 for between $40 and $50.

    Consumers should stop using the heaters, unplug them and contact Lasko Products for instructions on returning the heater to receive a free replacement heater or a product of similar value.

    Consumer Contact: Consumers can call Lasko Products toll-free at (800) 233-6373 anytime or visit the firms Web site at www.laskoproducts.com/recall_heaters.html for more information and to determine if their heater is involved in the recall.

    The recall is being conducted in cooperation with the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC).

    Lasko Recalls Space Heaters...

    New Jersey Sues Sleepy's

    Sold defective merchandise, state charges

    The New Jersey Division of Consumer Affairs sued Sleepy's Inc. and 1-800-Sleepy's, charging the mattress chain with violating the state's Consumer Fraud Act by selling defective merchandise and failing to keep its delivery promises.

    The state's five-count complaint was filed in Bergen County Superior Court, and The national chain operates 72 retail stores in New Jersey and routinely advertises its products in television and radio commercials, advertising circulars and newspapers, the suit noted.

    "Beds and mattresses are not cheap. They can cost consumers hundreds and, in some cases, thousands of dollars," Consumer Affairs Director Reni Erdos said. "When bedding retailers attempt to take advantage of consumers, as we allege Sleepy's and 1-800-Sleepy's have done, consumers stand to lose a lot of money, not to mention their peace of mind."

    The complaint lists a number of allegations, including:

    • misleading consumers regarding the companies' exchange policy and consumers' right to receive a refund;
    • failing to deliver merchandise on the contracted date of delivery and failing to notify consumers of their inability to deliver the merchandise as promised;
    • delivering defective and/or damaged merchandise;
    • delivering merchandise that was different from what consumers ordered;
    • refusing to provide refunds to consumers who complained that they received defective merchandise;
    • promising, then failing to send, an inspector to consumers' homes to inspect defective or damaged merchandise or only conducting inspections after extensive follow-up by consumers;
    • failing to respond to dissatisfied consumers' telephone calls, letters and/or email messages in a timely manner;
    • failing to specify the duration of a sale in an advertisement; and
    • advertising that a sale contains "The Lowest Prices in Our History" when, in fact, the same merchandise has been offered for sale previously at the same price.

    "Companies that do business in New Jersey are expected to deal with consumers in a fair and honest fashion and to adhere to the State's consumer protection laws," Attorney General Peter C. Harvey. "Where we find abuses in the marketplace, we will work to ensure that companies responsible for violating State law and harming consumers are held accountable."

    This is the second time in recent months that Consumer Affairs has brought suit against a bedding retailer. In December, Consumer Affairs filed suit against Rockaway Bedding alleging the retailer engaged in unscrupulous business practices by, among other things, selling defective merchandise to consumers and engaging in fraudulent advertising.

    "Sleepy's was extremely surprised by the allegations in the complaint and immediately commenced an investigation to determine the source of the allegations," the company said in a prepared statement.

    Sleepy's has 300 store locations nationwide.

    Jersey Division of Consumer Affairs sued Sleepy's Inc. & 1-800-Sleepy's, charging the mattress chain with violating the state's Consumer Fraud Act by selli...

    Get trending consumer news and recalls

      By entering your email, you agree to sign up for consumer news, tips and giveaways from ConsumerAffairs. Unsubscribe at any time.

      Thanks for subscribing.

      You have successfully subscribed to our newsletter! Enjoy reading our tips and recommendations.