CenturyLink Reviews
formerly Qwest
- We require contact information to ensure our reviewers are real.
- Our moderators read all reviews to verify quality and helpfulness.
- We use intelligent software that helps us maintain the integrity of reviews.
About CenturyLink
CenturyLink offers internet download speeds between 100 Mbps to 940 Mbps and monthly plans starting at $49. It provides bundling services for residential and small business customers and serves 36 states. Not all states in CenturyLink’s converge area will have fiber optic options. CenturyLink breaks its internet services down into two main categories: the DSL plan and the Fiber Gigabit plan.
- Great for gamers
- Up to 940 Mbps
- No contracts
- Gigabit not available in all areas
- Not available in all states
CenturyLink Reviews
Filter by Rating
- (58)
- (39)
- (70)
- (215)
- (4,755)
Popular Mentions
- 4,898,961 reviews on ConsumerAffairs are verified.
- We require contact information to ensure our reviewers are real.
- We use intelligent software that helps us maintain the integrity of reviews.
- Our moderators read all reviews to verify quality and helpfulness.
Recent
- Recent
- Oldest
- Most helpful
A link has directed you to this review. Its location on this page may change next time you visit.
- 4,898,961 reviews on ConsumerAffairs are verified.
- We require contact information to ensure our reviewers are real.
- We use intelligent software that helps us maintain the integrity of reviews.
- Our moderators read all reviews to verify quality and helpfulness.
Reviewed July 9, 2007
Consequences: The CSRep took off the $6.99 without question and had no explanation for why the charge was added. Further, she said she didn't know how long we had been over-paying ($39 vs $29) and couldn't do anything about it because it's our fault if we don't seek out lower rates.
Reviewed May 30, 2007
Wireless. When we signed up for the service we were guaranteed that Embarq was not part of Sprint and they had totally seperated from them and they were a new company. They mentioned to us that they might use their towers from Sprint since they were new and they did not have their own at the time. We signed up and we were happy for a few months.
As the months past we were having issues with Embarq and as were going to transferr our service from them, that is when we found out how much they are connected to each other. Now in Janurary, we decided to switch services from Embarq to Cingular wireless.
As we started the transistion from one service to another service, we had porting issues from Embarq. Long story short, we had two lines that needed to be ported out of Embarq to Cingular. My wifes line went out with only one issue, but my personal line took over a week and a half to be ported out.
Reviewed May 12, 2007
I signed up for Qwest DSL in November of 2006. in March 2007, I called Qwest because my service was going slower than dial-up. The representative offered me a deal I could not refuse. He told me that if I sign up for an additional year of DSL, I would get my service for $36.99 with a speed of 7.0mb instead of the 1.5mb that I was getting, for the remaining year and seven months.
Reviewed April 20, 2007
After reading an article about the FCC and its increased interest in rural developments of broadband internet, I wanted to take a moment to bring to your attention the lack of motivation Embarq has to provide higher quality services to its seemingly remote customers.
My family moved to a rural part of Virginia in October 2004, from a fast-developing city in North Carolina. When we inquired about anything more than dial-up internet, with both Embarq and the local cable company (formerly Adelphia, now Comcast), we were met with a complete lack of concern for development, regardless of the fact that the lines to bring the services to our home are within one half mile away, and several of our neighbors are on the same waiting lists.
We were told on several occasions that progress would be made in our area soon and we would receive notification by mail once available. At one point we were even given a deadline of early 2006, which came and went with not a sign of progress in the entire area.
We ourselves contacted a contracting company (Camvera) used in other states to bring wireless broadband service to any customer who wanted it, and forwarded all the information given to us by the company on to all state government officials, including the governor, lieutenant governor, and the head of the technology department, with barely a response that it was something they were working on.
We do not consider satellite broadband an option, as it is very expensive and unreliable at times, and cannot understand why after all this time there has been no progress made, when we live on the same road as the local office, just five miles away. The money that we invest every month in a second line and dial-up internet, not to mention the time wasted waiting for internet pages to load and emails to come in is certainly something that needs to be addressed not only for my family, but for every family who would like to have more.
I recently heard that AOL increased its rates for dial-up service, regardless of the fact that the for the most part, the only people still using this ancient service have no choice in the matter.
Reviewed April 14, 2007
My local phone services have been disconnected and they continue to say I owe for these charges.
Reviewed Feb. 27, 2007
Reviewed Feb. 15, 2007
In the Fall of 2006 I ordered DSL from Qwest. About a week or two later I changed my mind and cancelled the DSL. I sent back the modem and Qwest confirmed that they received it. Now, come February 2007, I am still getting charged for the modem and the DSL line.
I have talked to 5 people regarding the billing and each person said they would straighten it out but I am still getting billed. Just recently they sent my account to a collection agency. The last Qwest representative I talked to said she would make sure I didn't get any more disconnect notices but I got one about 3 weeks after speaking with her.
Reviewed Feb. 2, 2007
Reviewed Dec. 19, 2006
My problem started in June 2006. I called Embarq because I had no dial tone in my home, they sent out a technician and he said that the problem was inside the house. I told him no, it was outside, the box on the outside of the house had an intermittent dial tone, it just happened to be working when he was there. He still insisted that the problem was inside and said he would gladly fix it for $50.00 for every 15 minutes he was there. I was unable to afford that so I told him I would figure something out and I told him I still thought the problem was outside because sometimes you got a dial tone in the box and sometimes you didn't.
Months went on and I paid my bill every month and had no phone. I couldn't afford the outrageous price they wanted to look at the inside wiring. On the morning of December 15, 2006 they ran a new phone line to my neighbor’s house and they put a new green "box" in my front yard that apparently holds the controls for all the lines in the area.
Reviewed Nov. 13, 2006
We cancelled our phone service on June 2 of this year (switching to an Internet phone service). We received a confirmation number and the date was confirmed.
However, we continued to receive a bill from Sprint who then sold to Embarq. We spoke with a supervisor, G Lang who assured us the balance was zero and it was an error on their part.
We still continue be to harassed by Embarq, claiming that moneys are owed to them.
Reviewed Oct. 19, 2006
Reviewed Oct. 13, 2006
We have been loyal Qwest customers for five years and have had the same calling plan. We re-signed for the same 2-year contract in April 2005, sometime between then and now Qwest changed our contracted plan without our knowledge or consent. Needless to say we went over our minutes and faced a $598.00 phone bill with a disconnect notice. We called to correct the problem as soon as we noticed that the overages were due to the calling plan being changed.
We spoke to a Qwest representative who acknowledged that the plan was changed but he didn't know why or how it happened. He assured us that we would be put on our original plan and be refunded the difference for as long as the change occurred. A week later, we received a credit for $198.00 which was only a third of the overages. We then spoke to several representatives who refused to send us paper copies of our billing history and also refused to honor the calling plan we contracted into.
Reviewed Sept. 18, 2006
I requested a DSL line and Qwest installed DSL and voice, assigned a number and collected for the voice portion for two years and eight months. Recently we installed a new phone system and found out the voice was not working. Qwest determined that the voice WAS NEVER HOOKED UP, but now says they only have to refund two years of payments since the phone was out of service and there is a two year window.
They claim that they can keep the other eight months of payment because I did not tell them they never hooked up the line. The line is one of four to my business and was used exclusively for DSL, was not part of our answering service or roll over service for incoming phone calls. They claim it is my fault for not discovering their mistake sooner.
They feel they should keep eight months and one week of payments for a line they NEVER INSTALLED. I think this is just wrong. The state PUC which never met a business it couldn´t protect sides with Qwest who says the phone was out of service when in fact it never was in service.
Reviewed Sept. 18, 2006
I moved home and arranged to have my phone reconnected as well as have DSL internet. I also ordered Direct TV through Qwest to be reconnected. They arranged to visit my property on the 11th of July but told me that no one would need access to the property. My phone was not connected on the 11th so I called and was told they did need access. Another visit was arranged for my phone etc on July 20th.
I made arrangements to be there and no one showed up between 8am and 6.30pm. I called repeatedly and was told eventually by a supervisor that someone would be there at 8am the next morning. Again, I took time off work and had Direct TV showing up during the morning but they needed a phone line. No one showed up or called. Eventually, someone from Qwest arrived at 1pm. Direct TV meanwhile couldn't come out as they were given the wrong address by Qwest, so that was reschedule for Aug 3rd.
When I subsequently called to ask for compensation, I was told I would have a month’s credit. I have just got off the phone after receiving a bill with no credit - and being on hold to speak to someone yet again who could authorize a credit. If I could change my service I would, but living in a remote area it is difficult to get other service providers.
Reviewed Aug. 15, 2006
rollover line when the main number is busy. It does not roll over nor go to voice mail but rings once and then drops the call. We are in the tourist business and when we don't get calls we don't get income.
Since the end of July we have lost $1000.s in revenue and documented pages of problems
ranging from bad service to no service with no end in sight.
After waiting today again for someone
to show up and fix the problem we received a message on a cell phone that they were unable to come today but no word when they could come.
They have been at least a 1/2 doz. times and each time tell us it is working but it is not. I have spent hours on the telephone( I am in the business office and not at the location) on hold waiting to speak
with someone, I have to make these calls daily and frequently. We are not only at wit's end but nearing the end of the tourist season as well. I have employees with families who depend on this job
and I have had to cut staff. I may be next.
We should be doing 10 times the volume of business
that we currently have. This translates to big, lost dollars that cannot be made. Out customers are on vacation and here for 1 or 2 weeks. They plan their
Reviewed Aug. 14, 2006
I used directory assistance to gain a long distance telephone number. Once given the number a recorded message came on stating for no additional charge your call can be directed automatically; so I did that. To my horror I was charged at the Assistance rate 16.84 for a 15 minute call; when I called the phone company they said there was nothing they could do Directory assistance charged that.
Reviewed July 19, 2006
Purchased bundle package in Nov. 2005 and have to call about billing every month. Double charge for DirecTV, Nov.,Mar. and again on June statement. Called and nothing resolved. Becky transferred me to DirecTV and they say I only owe one month & can't change Qwest billing, transferred back to Qwest and they say I owe 2 months and they won't remove it. I pay my Qwest bill in full every month and have been billed a month in advance (which is why they say I owe this) twice already and they want me to pay it again. As I explained I am on Social Security and the reason I chose the Bundle package was so I would know what I would be paying each month to budget. I am at a loss as to what to do. Barbara Marchando
None yet but I'm sure they will turn off at least my DirecTV because I deducted one month when making June payment.
Reviewed April 28, 2006
Qwest was, without us having ordered it, for one month our long distance provider. A bill that is usually about $20 was $134.56. I paid that bill on 1/20/06. Nevertheless we ahve a collection agency calling us. I prooved to both Qwest and the collector now 7 times via fax that I have paid that bill. Qwest ackonowledges that this money (and an overpayment) is there, it was just booked to an old CLOSED account and stayed there (they did not bother to inform us that there was a closed account with a credit)and the other account went to collections. Qwest actually acknowledges that they owe us something like $62. Now we have a lawyer calling us.
We never had any collections. We have negative consequences in our credit report beside the fact that it is nerve wrecking to get these calls and not being able to end it.
Reviewed April 12, 2006
I bundled services to include home phone service,dsl internet and Directv.I never received the internet service,but am still being charged.I was not informed that by bundling service, my home phone service would increase by about $10 and that there is a Billing Resource addition of $14.95.Qwest claims I owe them $170, which I did not pay,because I have never recieved the internet service, and I do not know what billing resource is. None of the representative can or will give me an address to send copies of the corrected bills with payment history to resolve this issue. Qwest claims that the $170 is for Directv, but this is only so they can keep the money and not pay Directv for services during the time it was bundled under Qwest. Bundling services does NOT save the consumer any money. They claim to have saved me $10 per month, but between the raise in my home phone service cost and the Billing resource, it actually costs over twice the claimed savings, besides the fact that they still charge me for internet service I have NEVER received!!
I have been diligent about paying my bills to get my credit rating back up. If this goes to collections, it will be an unwarranted scar on my credit.
Reviewed March 31, 2006
When I moved from one house to another last March, I applied for Qwest DSL services. I was clear and concise about what I wanted. What I was informed of as 3 to 5 days for a new customer became 5 weeks. Their compensation was to give me a free modem and one month's service (see losses below. This past month I was turned off for non-payment and was told since they physically disconnected me I was considered a new customer and it would take another 3 to 5 days to turn me on.
While talking to the sales department to get my service turned back on she convinced me to change to MSN Internet which would provide me with faster speed for less money. The changeover was due 3 days from the date filed. Two weeks later I had not been changed over and had to call Qwest servicecs to find out why. I was told that the order was cancelled by sales and they apologized to me and, after pointing out the misrepresentation, they gave me a $200 credit (20 a month) for the contract I was supposed to have in the first place.
At this time I was also told that my current email was going to continue for between 30-90 days. Today I woke up and found my email service was shut off. When I called Qwest I was told that it was due to the changeover and that the mailbox was deleted. However, my new MSN packet had not arrived yet so I have no email. My service had not been changed over and I have to wait until the end of the day to have my service changed over to MSN 5.0. Repeatedly I have had misrepresentions from the company. Each time I get a 'sincere' apology and the promise it will be fixed.
My downtime this time with my email will cause hours of my time to fix since I am on mailing lists and servers which delete me if I am not reachable. My first problem with Qwest cost me over 200 in ovechrage charges because I spent so much time trying to get my services on.
Reviewed March 24, 2006
I am a Qwest customer and I am writing to your office because my pay per view account with Qwest was and continues to be charged for ************ material that I did not order and do not want coming into my home inadvertently. I am in school full time and so is my son. I have enabled, on all of my accounts with Qwest, the pre-scribed parental and purchase controls and yet these charges to my account continue to occur many while we are clearly in school. I do not want and will not be paying for *********** that has been illegally charged to my account.
Qwest is trying hard to figure out how it happened, and has acknowledged that there was a problem that they are attempting to ameliorate. For me, the broader problem is how to prevent this sort of situation from recurring in the future as I do not wish to be charged for and held responsible for purchased of any kind that I did not order, but especially this sort of material. I was informed by a Qwest customer service employee that there are more charges for *********** on my next bill. They stated that their corporate policy does not allow them to remove these illegal charges to my account and that although there was some kind of problem that allowed the charges I would still have to pay them.
I do not understand a policy that does not take into consideration the fact that these kind of mistakes in the system happen and remove the charges that obviously do not belong to me, a long term, customer who does not have a history of purchasing this sort of material at all. it is clear that someone obtained access to my account and then proceeded to order daily this filth. I do not want to pay for the present nor future charges to my account for ************ material. If you were to go over my account it would become clear that I rarely order movies of any kind and especially not ***********. I have already been a recent victim of identity theft and I do not wish to be victimized again.
Reviewed Feb. 4, 2006
I signed up for the bundled service after being told that my phone bill each month for home phone service, dsl, direct tv and long distance would only be 100.00 dollars a month. My first bill was 354.00 and my second bill was 289.00. Not one of my bills have been even close to one hundred dollars but all over two hundred. When I call I can never find anyone to help me figure out the problem. I have called every month and spend about 2-3 hours on the phone only tho get nothing accomplished. My parents have the same problem with their phone bills.
Reviewed Jan. 17, 2006
I signed up for long distance service with Qwest even though I never foresaw using it simply because they had a plan with no monthly fee and 5 cents a minute up to a $20 maximum every month. Shortly after I signed up, they sent me a notice that they were going to start charging $2.99/mo for this service. I was annoyed and planned on canceling, but never actually got around to it (by not immediately canceling, I acknowledge that I implicitly agreed to pay $2.99/mo for long distance I wasn't using).
A few more months went by and then I got a notice from Qwest that they were raising the rate again to $4.99/mo. I decided that I was definitely not going to pay $5/mo for a service I don't use. Within 3 or 4 days of receiving that notice, I called Qwest to request that they cancel my long distance service and after sitting through the whole procedure, I was notified that I would be charged a $5 cancellation fee. I called back and explained to the customer service rep that I had never even implicitly agreed to long distance service at $4.99/mo and therefore a cancellation fee is completely bogus. She adamantly disagreed and said that every long distance carrier does this, etc.
Finally, when I threatened to do whatever necessary to resolve this, including filing a complaint with the FCC and getting a lawyer, she relunctantly backed down and said that IF I called back after I get my bill, they'll most likely reverse the cancellation fee just to be nice and just this once. Now... I understand raising rates on services. I also understand charging a cancellation fee if that was the agreement from the start. But it seems like it ought to be illegal to charge a cancellation fee for me not agreeing to continue service at a higher rate than I originally agreed to. If it's ok for them hike the rate by $2 and then charge me $5 for not agreeing to continue the service, then why couldn't they hike the rate by $200/mo and then charge me a $1000 cancellation fee if I want out?
I have been notified that I will incur financial damage of $5. While not a significant amount, I believe the principle is significant.
Reviewed Jan. 16, 2006
I changed my business name to work around this, because as a small business, I don’t have millions of dollars to sue Qwest or the other person. I discover that now they won’t allow me to advertize under my new business name because it’s a cell phone, but want to charge me for the old listing through the end of the year. It is January, and I receive another bill for the old listing. They still want me to pay for an old listing, but won't let me pay for a new (also legal) listing. I have called so many times; I have sent letters, all without response. I don't even know what to do.
I have lost business, since I spent years building a reputation, but with my advertizing going to another number. Now I can't advertize at all with Qwest unless I spend even more money and get land line phone with Qwest- which I would have had in the first place...
Reviewed Jan. 3, 2006
They put colored paint marks all over the street where they were to come and dig up the streets and make further repairs scheduled for September 2005, they never came but the paint marks are still there. I certainly hope that you can help me with this problem. If it is not repaired completely without just doing patchwork that lasts for a few hours, my next step would be to write to Richard Notebaert, Chairman & CEO of QWest, Jeff Hatch-Miller, Chairman of the Arizona Corporation Commission, and Terry Goddard, Arizona Attorney General.
Talking on the telephone is almost impossible. My son works in the evenings, I am always concerned that in an emergency, our line will be out and he would be unable to contact us.
Reviewed Jan. 2, 2006
Qwest has never been great with billing. Everytime I sign-up for something or change it they screw with the bill for months before somebody fixes it correctly. I just signed-up for DSL and found out that what they advertised and what they said was going to happen came no where near to the truth. I was quoted 29.99/month and free modem rental with my qualifying home package. The Customer service rep I chatted with online and the guy I called both said my basic line with caller-id worked fine as a qualifying package. I didn't sign-up until I found out for sure.
After I got hooked-up and dumped cable I recieved my first bill which looked nothing like my verified sign-up page. I was charged another 5$ for not being a quailfying plan and I was also charged for the modem that was supposed to be free rental for the same reason. When I called to get it corrected Qwest reps told me I was out of luck unless I wanted to change to a more expensive plan that qualified. I tried that plan before and it took over 6 months to get the bill straightened out. No Thank You. I feel bad for getting screwed but even worse for telling other people about the deal they could get. Please don't give Qwest any more money.
I was charged more money than advertised. I had to go through hassle of stopping previous service and restarting it after I cancelled DSL. I was charged for shipping on Modem that was part of bundle. $$$$ lots of it.
Reviewed Dec. 13, 2005
I have spoken with five different representatives with no action taken, despite promises. The sixth technician finally listened and was able to contact Vartec. Now, Vartec is not able, yet, to re-establish long distance service. In the meantime, I am left without resort to communication via telephone, unless it is in my city. Vartec, with its outsourcing technicians appears to be as incapable as Qwest has been, so what is a consumer supposed to do? Get in touch with the FCC? We have relatives in other areas who are quite ill and have family members flying internationally to Marion. We cannot call them. The break-up of the Bell system has been a disaster. It's ludicrous!
Reviewed Nov. 22, 2005
For the last 2 billings Qwest has charged me for services I did not use. Luckily I could prove that no one was home at the times they tried to charge me for and they removed the charges. How many people don't check their bills? I had them put a block on pay for services. Today they called me and told me the services I hafd asked for were now available?
Reviewed Oct. 28, 2005
my piece of mind is disturbed and I am not getting sleep and I feel nothing is being addressed as to the exact cause of this problem and Qwest isn't addressing this problem at all.I have purchased two new phones just in case my old phones were faulty.
Reviewed Oct. 27, 2005
I sent a certified letter to the CEO regarding billing problems Qwest created. The regulatory anlayst mailed me their internal accounting statement, which proved my point (that they were over-billing and not posting correctly). I have emailed her twice. She responded the first time, but after I told her that the statement she mailed me doesn't reflect the two payments I had made, she has not communicated back with me.
While on a call with a internal Qwest accounting person earlier this year, some information leaked out on what could turn out to be a major design flaw in their billing system. I am a professional software tester and Quality Assurance Analyst and can see how my problem could result in millions of dollars (or tens of million) when multiplied across Qwest's customer base. After I terminated my service with Qwest in July 2005 (with Qwest's even sending me a $2.62 refund check), then on Oct 3, 2005 - out of the blue - a collection agency notice appears in my mailbox. Not only is this notice bogus, but Qwest made no effort to contact me - and remember, they just refunded me!
While the billing problem is a small amount, it has taken a lot of my personal time. I have let Qwest know that I plan on billing them at $75/hour for my research. This has affected my work, my cell phone charges and general health (I can't get as much rest as I need).
Reviewed Oct. 20, 2005
I signed up the best bundle service this company has and I ordered 2 wireless phones for my daughter & her husband to use. We were informed that our home-cell 1 & cell 2, cell 1-cell 2, cell 1&2 - home calls would be free & that the cellular service plan minutes would not be deducted from the account, turns out that was a lie and now we have an extremely high cell phone bill for the wireless services. I have not called the company to complain yet but just thought I'd let everyone else out there know that watch out with Qwest Wireless if you don't already know, make sure your account is noted by the rep about your services and the exact details of the contract because if you don't they'll get you with hidden fees.
Now I am in the hole and it is going to take me quite some time to get out.
Reviewed Aug. 8, 2005
Well it is Monday and our home phone is not working yet again. A service repairman was out working on the box behind the house yesterday and today the phone does not work. At least every two weeks and sometimes twice a week for the past year we have not had service and we have had to contact Qwest. They usually try to blame in our our cordless phone batteries, but we have one land line that does not work either at the time. Since I work I usually make a service request on line since the waits for service on the phone can last as long as 20 minutes. The problem is usually solved by the end of the day but this seems to happen way too often. I pay over $50 a month for just basic phone service with caller ID, unlisted/unpublished number and voice messaging and I think for that money the service should be a lot better than it is.
Reviewed April 14, 2005
They put us into collections after we paid our last bill. They sent us 5 final bills all of varying amounts.
Reviewed April 4, 2005
I signed up for long distance with no monthly fee, now they are charging me $2.00 per month per line. They claim to have sent a letter telling this increase, however, with all the junk mail we receive daily I cannot say if this was received or not. I think an upcoming increase should be stated on the actual bill.
Reviewed Oct. 21, 2003
I called wanting to cancel my phones, because they did not hold up to their end of the agreement. They said that I had a contract and I was going to be charged $200.00 for each phone if I canceled the service. I was told if this kept happening I could cancel the service with no problem. That was a lie. I am still on the phone every month for corrections having to be made on my bill.
Reviewed Oct. 15, 2003
Qwest West initiated a new contract on my upgrade account and I feel this was manipulative and unnecessary and that their policies do not require this. I believe it was done because sales people get a commission for new contracts. I believe it was done because the sales person got commission credit for two accounts when it should have been one. This month Qwest disconnected my cell phone service due to non-payment. I checked with my bank and payment was accepted by Qwest (the payment cleared the bank) on October 10th which was the due date. Qwest refused to acknowledge that they are behind in posting payments to their accounts, instead they claim I have not made a payment and today is October 15th. They give no credence to my bank's claims.
I canceled service today in exasperation and they are going to charge me a $200.00 fee for not fulfilling my contract. I counter claimed they they had not lived up to thier contract and verbal agreements and so the contract is nullify by them and I won't pay the fee.
Mark should complaint to the Arizona Attorney General and the Arizona Public Utility Commisison. He can find them both in our Consumer Resources Guide.
Reviewed July 31, 2003
I was extremely angry about the whole situation and I would discontinue my home phone service with the company if I could, but they are the only phone provider in my area. I was supposed to get a large credit off this bill and they are still charging me after the service was discontinued and they are trying to charge me for a phone I am returning.
Reviewed Oct. 19, 2002
I moved into my new shop on August 5. It is now October 18, and my phones are still not working properly. I have called Qwest an average of 3 times per week (I say average because there have been weeks where I have called them several times a day). There have been 3 days where I spent more than 75% of my workday JUST dealing with Qwest on the telephone TRYING to get them to fix my phones.I have lost LOTS and LOTS of business. I have lost customers because Qwest "accidentally" turned off my business line on what is supposed to be the busiest day of the year. My customers thought that we didn't pay our phone bill! I JUST WANT THEM TO FIX MY PHONES! THEY ARE THE ONLY PHONE COMPANY THAT SERVICES MY BUSINESS PARK!
Reviewed Sept. 6, 2002
I never got what they told me! I've asked twice now for a investagation on my charges, from my bills I have, they are taking away the minutes that I've used between cell to cell, and cell to home. Which in turn would cause my bills to be so high!
Reviewed Aug. 29, 2002
I have a couple of wireless phones. I just began reading some of the complaints regarding double billing, poor service. My sister and I are so fed up with Qwest but we cannot even begin to figure out how they do it. I have a post graduate degree in Education organization and how to deal with bureacracy is one of my workshops. I am baffled by the ineptness of this company. I cannot begin to describe it.
I have never been as irritated as I am with Qwest. I include being a Marine, licensed foster parent (DSHS) but this company has no idea what is going on and how they are treating loyal customers as hostages who are "stuck with the company." I cannot drop even two of my phones because somehow despite spending close to $2,000 the past sixteen months for a service that is supposed to be $89.95 a month, I would be hit with big penalty charges. I want to give up but hundreds of kids that are high risk and need sometimes to talk depend on the one number.
Reviewed Aug. 26, 2002
Starting then, we received phone calls at home from people asking for the United States Post Office every 30 minutes. My husband was at home and told me that he was harrassed all day long, and that generally people called 3-4 times before to understand that we were not USPS. Wednesday the 21st, I called Qwest again to request another telephone number. I was told that it would be done in about three days, and that I would be charged $10, since I was the one requesting a change, and since the number was not in use for at least 90 days.
I discovered Thursday the 22nd that this last information is incorrect. Indeed, the telephone number that has been assigned to me is (602)-xxx-8777. However, (800)-275-8777 is the phone number of the United States Postal Service for all cities of the Arizona East Valley. The current edition of the Qwest phone book (see the blue pages page #26) contains three columns filled with the 800-275-8777 for the postal office. Actually, the alphabetic code corresponding to the last seven digits means ASK-USPS.
We even received five calls from Qwest telemarketers asking for USPS! During that time, calls concerning USPS continued, starting at 7:00 in the morning. Each time we had to tell the angry people that we were not USPS. We finally decided to unplug our telephone, so that we missed important calls and could not use the service we were paying for.
I discovered Wednesday 21st that I had Qwest extra-services that I never requested, such as caller ID, security screening, along with other undesired services. I spent 40 minutes on the phone Wednesday evening with four different Qwest employees for having these services removed. Five days later, we still have these services active. Still in the same period of time, we discovered that people who were trying to call us from outside Arizona (either from another state or from outside the country) could not reach us when our phone was plugged in. Actually, these people reached someone else's home at each call attempt, despite the fact that they were dialing our number correctly. I called Qwest about that problem. I was told that I had a kind of filter on my telephone line, and that I should dial a certain number in order to de-activate that filter ... but when I did it, I heard an automatic voice saying me "try again, try again, try again". Thus, five days later, we still could not receive long distance calls.
Reviewed Aug. 21, 2002
Economical damage of $108.90. I feel that I have been cheated and taken advantage of. I have given Qwest all of my business. Home phone, two cell phones, Internet, and DSL services. As a result of this charge I have cancelled my DSL through them I will be looking for a new Internet provider and a new wireless company. They will not be getting any more of my money than necessary from now on!
Reviewed Aug. 12, 2002
I called on July 5 and again was told that there was no way that should have happened and it had been a mistake. My phones were again reactivated. I asked at that time if I would be able to pay my bill correctly and if my home phone and wireless account were joined. On July 15 I received a call from Qwest to pay my bill of 93.00. On July 16 I was permanantly disconnected. My check cleared on the 26 of July and the next bill I recieved was for 800.00. I cannot believe that a company is allowed to participate in this kind of fraud. They have not provided me with their contractual obligations, have misled and lied to me and have no consequences. I, on the other hand am stuck with an $800 phone bill.
Also, I was told I would receive three $50 credit cards after I paid for the three phones and I only received two. When I received the first bill, the residential line was not included in the wireless plan and Qwest had a $193.22 equipment charge (first of several equipment charges). I called and complained and was told the mistake was mine and they couldnt change anything. After several phone calls and complaints, and nothing being done (they did give us a one time rebate of $150), I canceled my wireless plan in May and was charged a $200 per phone fee for canceling my wireless plan. For the time I had the wireless plan, and if the agreement I agreed to had been honored, the total cost should have been $638.99; Qwest has charged us $1808.45.
Reviewed July 13, 2002
OK, in order to correct it we have to start from scratch and lose our e-mail address. Too much headache. Next, we discover that my husband is sending out e-mails that show up under my name. Qwest screws up the account setup. Both Qwest and MSN say there is no fix other than to set up a whole new account. However, they do not recycle e-mail addresses, so we'll lose those as well as being without service for 3 weeks. Next, we receive a package addressed to a man we have never heard of, at our address referencing our second telephone number (fax line and supposed to be DSL). Turns out it is the modem for DSL service on our second line. It will be billed to us, although the user name is someone else and the e-mail is something we never requested. Again, they have completely botched this order - I spent 3 straight hours on Friday, July 12, as well as numerous calls to Qwest and MSN.
Reviewed June 10, 2002
I called Sprint back, they checked and said they sent a refund to Qwest but it was returned because my account was closed with Qwest. So because Qwest are inept and cannot except a valid payment they refered it to collections. I have paid the collection ($49.15) to hopefully stop it going on my credit report, Sprint said they would try and send me a check. Qwest don't even have a complaints dept.
Reviewed May 20, 2002
I called Qwest and they told me that the machine that counts the minutes does not make mistakes and refused to fixe it, I also complained about roaming charges and they refused to fix them as well arguing that I call every month to complain and that its my fault to be calling while my phone is on roaming, but sometimes sitting in my apartment I'm already in a call when the roaming starts and I don't notice until later, what am I supposed to do?
Reviewed May 16, 2002
The phone was shut off, no one knows who Natalia is, and I am now stuck with bills that I am not responsible for. Their only reply is that they dont have any record of the call that was placed from SF so I am responsible for the charges. I am a longtime customer and have always paid my bills. I did what I was told to do and am still being held accountable for chargers that I did not incur. They would rather lose a longtime customer and potentially thousands of dollars from an honest customer than to admit that their system did not work properly. Unfortunately I don't have that refernce number but I have reference number for another call that they have no record of. But of course their system is infallible.
Reviewed May 6, 2002
However, when we tried to call our number from another phone, there was an annoying message saying that our number was not in service. They had given us a different phone number than the one we had previously requested and that they had O.K.'d for us weeks before. Now they said that number was not available for residential service. Apparently the original person didn't know what he was doing, or was it the next guy? I think it could have been both. Anyway, it was a pain trying to find out exactly what our new number really was.
Well, we finally got over that pain in the neck and then were shocked at an even deeper level by Qwest. We received a threatening letter from a collection agency saying that we hadn't paid a $600 bill we owed to Qwest for cellular service. Well, first of all, we have never owned a cell phone of any kind. Secondly, they didn't even have our correct address or phone number on the bill. Thirdly, we never received any prior warning about this bogus bill until it had been sent to collections and damaged our credit. Qwest was - as usual- confused and befuddled and rude at every level. They verified that we never had cellular service with them, but weren't going to fix the problem they had created with our credit. That was going to be up to us. Well, after some serious threatening, we got them to agree to call the collection agency and explain their mistake. But until it is all taken care of we will have that scar on our credit. What is their problem. Why are they so messed up?
Reviewed May 2, 2002
They promised me long distance for 4.9 cents per minute and a $50 rebate for switching. I never got the rebate and they charged $.20 per minute. My long distance charges for 6 weeks were nearly $300 instead of the $75 - $50 rebate = $25, that I was led to believe. It also upset me and my husband that we were cheated.
Reviewed April 29, 2002
14 months of trying to deal with Qwest on one of their 2 in one phones. It has gotten completely out of hand where they will not talk with me and have disconnected all my services. I have filed complaints with the Idaho PUC and the Idaho State Attorney General. This is all their falt due to extremely poor customer service reps. and extremely poor record keeping.
Reviewed April 10, 2002
I then received my April 1st 2002 phone bill and there was a charge on the bill of $2.00 that showed up in the section "Optional Services" -- this is a charge that is a monthly charge. The name of the charge is "Toll restriction services Individual & key lines." When I called to inquire about what this is the representative stated that this is a charge that will be charged every month in leau of choosing to pay the deposit for access to a long distance line. I was apalled. Not only have I been denied acess to a long distance line, I am being charged for them blocking the account EVERY MONTH!
Reviewed April 10, 2002
Qwest recently took over the previous telephone provider, named US West, and began changing the charges for many of its services, including some that were expected and others that were total surprises. First, they sent out a letter to notify the customers of rate increases, which not only took effect the following month, but they also charged retroactively for the previous time that Qwest had been the service provider.
Then, after never having paid for a particular directory assistance number - (602) 555-1212 - they charged me for a huge quantity of these calls last month. This was totally without warning. I could not find any listing for that particular number in reference to charges being incurred for its use, nor could the customer service representative direct me to such information. Additionally, I had previously paid a special surcharge to block all additional charges from my phoneline (to avoid this type of situation), and I still have this huge bill.
I know that I incurred at least $15 in charges for the directory assistance calls, but the other amounts probably add up to at least anoth $10 or so. I have also called the phone company twice, yielding no results other than waiting on hold for long periods of time. I made one call to the state's corporation commission which was never returned. I am disgusted with the amount of abuse that these guys are allowed to commit without penalties.
Actually Qwest is US West. Same company, different name. Oh, and there are plenty of new charges too, now that local telephone service is largely deregulated.
Reviewed June 15, 2001
I had a contract with Quest for long distance services for nearly 2 years. I was given the rates of 10 cents for UK and 7 cents for USA. So far everything was right. Since 1 April I received a bill charging more than $1.00 a minute. I thought it was a mistake. We received the bill for May and the same thing.
Bell South told me it was not their fault and if We did not pay then the service will be discontinued so we paid the bill. We rang the Qwest and they said I can enroll in the new plan and then they will give me the credit.
Reviewed May 16, 2001
I moved into a new apartment, and had my phone service connected and Qwest as my long distance carrier. There was a problem with my telephone line (it was crossed). When I was on the line, my line was interrupted by another party who took over my line. I could not receive or place a call until the other party hung up. I had my local carrier (Verizon) come and correct the problem.
However, Qwest's Customer Service and Fraud Dept. have given me the run around and all kinds of excuses and no help to resolve the issue. It is just about 1 year since the whole incident occured and they have not called nor written me to discuss this matter at all. This is a very sizable amount of money, which they have sent to a Collections Agency seeking payment.
My work is very time intensive and I do not have a lot of time to spend on personal calls. I have spent several hours on the phone speaking with Qwest's Representatives and Supervisors and the issue has not come to any conclusion. I find it strange that they do not want to settle this matter ASAP.
Willie needs to stop wasting time on the phone. He should write a very clear and detailed description of what happened and mail it via certified mail, return-receipt-requested, to Qwest with a copy to Verizon. He should state in the letter that the company is wrongfully charging him for service used by another party and state that he anticipates Qwest's timely action in voiding the charge. If this doesn't work, Willie can send copies of the letter to the Federal Communications Commission and his state Public Utilities Commission asking for their assistance.
Reviewed April 10, 2001
I suffered and am still suffering from the extremely poor service. In October of 1999 I received my cellular phones and was told I would get 10 percent off because I purchased two (at times I did not receive my promised 10 percent). Then in the year 2000 after arguing and them rendering my phones unusable they over charged me $700.00 and finally reimbursed it (after a Channel 7 news story).
How fair is that when they are over charging the person anyway and that money should never go to them? They shut my phones off because I sent back the two new phones I ordered because they did not have the software updated. I received the new phone and sent the old ones back, they shut my phones off and hindered my business because they forgot to release the RMA packet and the phone were in their possesion at the time.
I believe there is a lot they owe me for loss of clients in 1999 and 2000 that have been lost or money I would have made via technical support call I would have received if they did not overcharge me $700.00 and then shut our phones off that I use for business. They really hurt my business and my time I could have been spending with a client.
Reviewed March 31, 2001
I signed up for a 30-cent international calling plan and quit a few days later when I decided there were no savings. When we made one call in this period we were charged $2.74 a minute! Calls to Customer Service were answered with, "Can't do anything for you."
Outrageous phone bill -- one call for $104.12!
Reviewed March 4, 2001
Qwest double billed me for my cell phone this month. While the account person was coridal and immediately fixed the account when I called ot complain, I was distrubed to hear her say that "everybody got double billed, oops." I wonder how many senior citizens and less vigilant consumers have paid their double bill from Qwest this month?
No damage reulted to me. I am concerned, however, about the thousands or even millions of extra dollars Quest is collecting this month if, indeed, "everybody" got double billed. Will Qwest voluntarily refund the overpay without to everybody without being asked? Why do I doubt that?
Reviewed Feb. 12, 2001
I am a suscriber to Qwest International phone plan. I call France and Canada a lot. I uncovered that my November 2000 to 2/10/2001 phone bill was unusually high. I calculated that on a phone call from France I was charged at 95 cents a minute versus the 13 cents I was supposed to pay.
I contacted Qwest and was informed that the plan was no longer available since October 2000. They could sign me up for a new plan at 22 cents a minute for France and 10 cents a minute for Canada as of today with a monthly fee. I complained that the fees were outrageous and no notice was sent to me about the changes. The response I got was, "Sorry."
Reviewed Feb. 10, 2001
Later that week I was informed that the services that we ordered were no longer available in our area because they were sold out and the salesperson that I spoke with didn't know. In the meantine I received the phone that I ordered and it was a huge piece of junk! When using the phone, if I moved my hand on the handset even a little bit it created so much static that I couldn't hear anything. I also found out from the invoice that I was being charged a huge finance fee which I was never made aware of at the time of the sale. As stated on the invoice, I requested a return label. I finally received one about a month later and returned the phone. Qwest received the phone in October and it is now February 2001. JUST IN THE LAST MONTH I received credit for the phone. In the meantine I was still being charged for it even though Qwest could verify that it had been received and was sitting in their warehouse!
Additionally, I cancelled my service with Qwest and signed up with another company altogether. Additionally (as if it wasn't already bad enough) Qwest representatives stated to me that the only outstanding charge was for At&T long distance but I was given three different amounts. I called AT&T directly and was given the correct amount and mailed them a check. I sent a letter to Qwest stating that I had settled my bill with AT&T but still received statements showing an amount due! I received a letter from Qwest in January that they were going to send me to collections because I still owed them money! When I called (which was about 15 times) I always asked to speak to a supervisor and was told over and over that "since I was no longer a customer of Qwest I COULD NOT speak to a supervisor." I asked if there was an office that I could go to and speak to someone in person and was told that they do not have any such offices, that they only conduct business by phone.
Finally, I had to call the Corporation Commission and file a formal complaint. They were required to respond to my complaint within a certain period of time and "Mary" from their executive office called and apologized, saying that the company has grown so quickly that they cannot keep up, and cannot provide good customer service. Supposedly the bill was settled, however I have yet to receive the requested confirmation letter. The damages that I suffered in the end were the result of my anger about this whole situation. It got to the point that I couldn't even talk about it without getting absolutely furious. Now that it's over I don't feel any better, the representative from Qwest that called apologized, but what does that do for the hours and hours that I spent on the phone trying to get this straightened out and how close my credit came to being damaged by something that wasn't my fault?
Reviewed Nov. 17, 2000
I have been overbilled by Qwest Communications for calls that I have made. This call was made on Aug 26th 12:12am. Typically calls to India being expensive, I do not speak for more than 20 minutes or so, and that is consistent with all the calls that I have ever made. Qwest had billed me for 4 hours and 40 minutes. I have been billed $150 for this call.
Qwest says that its possible that I did not hang up. I think that's not possible at all. Even if I gave them the benefit of doubt, the party in India would have hung up. That being the case the line should have dropped. It is impossible that both parties would have not hung up. For a fact i did not speak for 4:40 hrs. The only possibility is that the line did not drop. Then this is carrier error. Why should i be billed for the technical malfunction?
Sanjay should file a complaint with his state Public Utilities Commission and with the Federal Communications Commission.
Reviewed April 4, 2000
At the beginning of January we switched our long distance carrier to Qwest. They never mentioned the $4 a month charge. We didn't make a big deal of it and just paid it. February also had just the $4 charge on it plus our long distance charges. Well, come March, I had a charge for $11 and another for $18. Knowing they never mentioned the charges when I signed up for their service, I called them and asked them what the charges were for.
I believe Qwest is on a quest to rip off their customers. Needless to say, I cancelled my account.
CenturyLink Company Information
- Company Name:
- CenturyLink
- Website:
- www.centurylink.com