
Nissan Reviews
- We require contact information to ensure our reviewers are real.
- Our moderators read all reviews to verify quality and helpfulness.
- We use intelligent software that helps us maintain the integrity of reviews.
About Nissan
Nissan is a Japanese manufacturer of cars, trucks, SUVs and electric cars for every lifestyle. Read reviews for their many models:
Nissan Reviews
Filter by Rating
- (32)
- (17)
- (24)
- (93)
- (821)
Popular Mentions
- 4,874,223 reviews on ConsumerAffairs are verified.
- We require contact information to ensure our reviewers are real.
- We use intelligent software that helps us maintain the integrity of reviews.
- Our moderators read all reviews to verify quality and helpfulness.
Recent
- Recent
- Oldest
- Most helpful
A link has directed you to this review. Its location on this page may change next time you visit.
- 4,874,223 reviews on ConsumerAffairs are verified.
- We require contact information to ensure our reviewers are real.
- We use intelligent software that helps us maintain the integrity of reviews.
- Our moderators read all reviews to verify quality and helpfulness.
Reviewed July 26, 2010
My transmission cooler failed at about 87,000 miles. Luckily, I knew about this issue before I bought the vehicle and we bought the extended warranty. Nissan should recall this. I'd like to know what the failure numbers are. I lost a $100 deductible & time when I took it to the dealer.
Reviewed July 24, 2010
While driving on a main highway, coming off a busy bridge, I came across an unavoidable pot hole. I heard something fall in the trunk of my 08 Nissan Quest, but thought nothing of it. After an hour, I decided to stop at a rest area when we noticed the right side rail cover was missing. When I came back, I made an appointment to bring vehicle to get tires replaced and the rail cover. The Nissan service person advised me they couldn't cover the cost for rail cover because the mileage was over what the warranty allowed (over by less than 2000 miles) and we didn't have the part. I had the tires replaced but refused to pay their outrageous prices for such replacement.
I brought the car to a trusted body repair who happened to work for Nissan prior to opening his own repair shop business. When installing the part, he determined that the screw that belonged behind the tail light was missing. In fact, the piece behind the tail light had no trace of ever having a screw in there, which led us to believe that it was the reason why the part fell off. I asked the repair person to check the left side to make sure it had it.
Surprisingly enough, it did have one, however, it was a used, old looking rusty one, definitely not the original. The only explanation I could think of is that back in 2008, a couple of months after I purchased the van, the left sliding door was giving me problems and they had to repair it, when, I'm pretty sure, they had to remove the rail cover. After I learned that the missing screw was the cause for the part of fall off, I called the Service Manager at Nissan.
After 4 days and messages, I finally was able to talk to him over the phone. I explained to him that I felt that they should have covered the part due to the observations we made. He explained that he himself looked at it and he couldn't determine that and that it was just an assumption. He went on to say that the part could have been damaged by us purposely and that there was no way he could tell what happened to the part. I explained the circumstances of how and when the part fell, the fact that even if I saw the part fall off, I couldn't get to it unless I put myself and my family in a life threatening situation.
I was driving off the George Washington bridge on the NY side. There is no way I could have avoided the pot hole, there was nowhere to swerve. There was no way of retrieving this part unless I caused major traffic and accidents. He advised me of the regulations once again and told me to call 800 Nissan1.
I called this number, and after explaining the situation and why I felt they should reimburse me, they hung up on me. The lady that took the info didn't ask for my contact info, so I decided to call back immediately. I spoke to another rep who took info and said would forward me to another department and they would call me within 2-3 business days. I then received a call from the Regional Manager who asked me questions and then said she would have to investigate.
She called me back a day or two later and said that unfortunately they couldn't reimburse me because aside from not having part & warranty had run out, the pot hole could have been the cause of damage, and I had an outside facility, other than Nissan, to replace part. She mentioned that in whatever page of warranty info booklet, it stated that they don't reimburse if parts are replaced outside of Nissan. She did forget to mention that on page 3 of this same booklet also states Nissan would occasionally reimburse part of cost beyond of outside the terms of the warranty.
Basically, I was looking for a cheaper way, without losing quality, to get this part replaced and avoid damage to the door mechanisms. My intentions were to have it replaced by Nissan, but if I had to pay for it, why did it have to be them? So I feel that I was forced to go somewhere else or pay their outrageous prices.
I was fuming and told her that I would follow up with BBB and she told me to do whatever I needed to do. I asked her to speak to her supervisor and she said she was it, no one higher than her. My next step is to write a letter and send to as many Nissan departments, as well as the BBB. I've already did the online form and I'm awaiting the next step. I will not rest until I get reimbursed and that this situation is looked into by recall agency and others of interest because for all I know, I probably caused damage to another car and wasn't aware of it. This could have also hurt a passenger or a pedestrian. Nissan's mission statement says that they build high-quality cars and safe cars. I now have my doubts. I don't deserve this run around.
Reviewed July 16, 2010
I told them about my transmission's other problems, but they aren't willing to fix it. I have had to spend hundreds of dollars in repair. I depend on this car to transport my father who's on dialysis. I am in a bind!
Reviewed July 13, 2010
2. Manufacturing defect.
I called Nissan Consumer Affairs to get help to pay for repairs. I called on 7/1/2010, and I was supposed to get a call back from Nissan Consumer Affairs specialist by the end of the day on 7/2/2010. Finally, I got a call on 7/6/2010 to tell me he was going to get in contact with Frederick ** (service director) and then send file to someone else for final decision as to whether they were going to pay for it.
I was also told on 7/2/2010 that he would call me back the next day, 7/3/2010 (He never called.), and I waited till Friday, 7/9/2010, because they still haven't called back. Also, I called customer support, and they emailed him several times to get him or someone else to call me back. I'm still not getting answers. Gordon is not returning my calls or emailing Frederick ** back.
Reviewed July 13, 2010
Front brake rotors keep warping every 12,000 miles. Nissan will no longer cover. Have had brakes done 3 times since I bought new in 2007. The last time I took to dealer they wrote for a reason customer drives truck brakes get hot then drives thru puddles thus warping rotors!
Reviewed July 8, 2010
My car payment isn't due until the 14th of this month and I got a call from Nissan Financial at work to tell me that if they hadn't received payment by the 14th, that it would be sent to collections. I have had my Altima for three years and have never been late on a payment. I can't understand why they had the nerve to call me on my work phone, versus the home phone or cell phone. In addition, my husband's name is on the financing of the account and not mine, so I am unsure how and why they contacted me. Further, I asked if she just wanted payment over the phone and she indicated that they only accept Discover.
Reviewed July 2, 2010
I had my fuel gauge issue with Nissan parts fixed. A week later, I received a recall letter. Nissan insisted on redoing the work, they did and reimbursed me my original cost. However, the problem has not been corrected, my vehicle has been at the dealership on three occasions and the problem still persists. Nissan Consumer Affairs is doing nothing to compensate me for this time and effort and still, I'm driving around a faulty gas gauge. They either have no clue what the issue really is, or have no problem putting out the customer to get off as cheaply as possible on the repairs.
Reviewed June 27, 2010
Nissan owners, read this: I, too, am a victim of Nissan. I have called and talked to anyone and everyone I could possibly get a hold of. I have the same problems: gas sensor and transmission torn up because of factory defect of radiators. Nissan refused to fix my 2006 Pathfinder. So, they need to recall all of them. With everyone's help, we can do this.
This is a very dangerous issue. We broke down on the side of the road. My pregnant daughter, 3-year-old grandson, and pregnant daughter-in-law were in the car. I'm very upset after reading all this and Nissan knowing a long time ago this was an issue. There should have been a recall a long, long time ago. We have to stick together. Call the attorney-general in TN (1-800-342-8385) and lodge a complaint against Nissan! And also call the Federal Trade Commission (1-877-382-4357). I hope everyone who has had problems, which are endless, will call these numbers and complain! I hope this helps.
Reviewed June 10, 2010
After having my car repaired for a bad crank sensor at another automotive shop, my car kept cutting off as I'm driving. I heard about the recall that Nissan was doing. After talking to someone at Nissan, they assured me that they would reimburse me but now, they are backing out.
I'm out of money for getting my car towed and repaired. It was very stressful and dangerous while driving and the car just go dead.
Reviewed June 10, 2010
My car kept cutting off as i'm driving after having my car repaired for a bad crank sensor at another automotive shop. i heard about a recall that Nissan was doing. After talking to someone at Nissan, they assured me that they would reimburse me. Now, they are backing out. I'm out money for getting the car towed and repaired. It was very stressful and dangerous while the car needed repairs.
Reviewed May 29, 2010
In 2006 I bought a Nissan Maxima SL (new). This is my second Nissan Maxima. I surely love the car. Right after 65k it began to jerk when shifting from second to third. Little by little the jerking continued to increase. I took it to be serviced in all the fluids, including the transmission. My mechanic told me to keep on eye on the transmission because he heard about the problem in others cars of the same model. When it got to 70k the jerking was more and more and I began to feel worry about it.
About 3 weeks ago, I was driving in the free way and out of the sudden the rpm of the tachometer rose to almost 6000 rpm and it jerked very strongly. I pulled out to a surface street and noticed that at 20 miles per hour the rpm was to 4000. I called the dealer to let them know that had happened and they were surprised that the car had transmission problems so soon, four years after I bought it, and in less that 100k miles. I called Nissan and they told me to take it to the dealer for a diagnosis of the transmission. The car was towed to the dealer and they said that a transmission work would be about $4500.00. To check with Nissan to see if they can do something for me. I did.
I called Nissan Consumer Affairs and talked with three different persons in a period of two weeks. The last person to talk with me told me: "I will talk to my supervisor and will call you right back." This was three weeks ago. Nobody has the courtesy of calling me back; at least to let me know that they don't care about my problem. What they are waiting is for several people to die as a result of faulty transmission, to then consider that, yes, there is a problem with the Nissan Maxima transmission. As for my car, it is in my drive way, unable to be used, and unable to be fixed, because I don't have the amount of money now to fix it. Thank you Nissan for your excellent customer service and for your "unbeatable concern" for your loyal costumers.
Reviewed May 22, 2010
My 05 Nissan Altima was involved in an accident and as a result was totaled. The insurance company paid the total amount of the car to Nissan Acceptance Cort. I was due a refund for my part of the pay off in the amount of $4,300 (approx). The payoff was received on April 5, 2010 from Direct Insurance to Nissan. I contacted Nissan to see when my refund would be mailed to me. I was told the policy was to hold the money for 21 days. I contacted the company after 21 days and spoke to Sahaya who went so far as to promise me that my check would be mailed in 3-5 days. I spoke with Ray and his supervisor Shane on May 10, again- 3-5 days.
At this point, no one will even tell me the status of the check. Has be been issued? Mailed? What is happening? I spoke with another supervisor, Peter on May 19. He stressed that he will personally resolve this matter and will call me the next day. When I received no call, I called and spoke to Supervisor Chris on May 20. He is going to check on Peter and find answers. No call back. I spoke again with Chris on May 21. I insisted on speaking with his supervisor, Mia. Once again, no one can tell me the status of this check. Mia assured me it would be mailed in 3-5 business days.
The economic damage I received is that due to the fact that I had been told company policy was that the money would be mailed in 21 days, I took out a home equity loan to finance another car on April 23. Another Nissan. I have now had to pay interest on this loan. I have spent about 10 hours trying to solve this problem.
Reviewed May 21, 2010
I have a Nissan Armada and the air bag light has been reset twice. It came on again and I took it to the dealer and they said it would cost $500.00 plus to fix the wiring in the dash. Claimed a front end accident caused the wiring in the desk to fail. The accident caused over $10k in damage and the air bad did not deploy. Is there a manufacturer defect? I contacted Nissan Corp. No help. No damage yet. Air bag light is still on and I figure the air bag will not work if we are in an accident.
Reviewed May 21, 2010
I would like to raise my issues regard my Nissan (Nivara) 2007 model chassis no. (MNTBD0SX83001023). I bought this car end of 2007. Since that time I am always facing a problem with the car. I went many times to the Nissan agencies. Unfortunately nobody cared about my problem. The problems which I faced in my car are:
2- Sound issues
3- Flexible AC pipe4- AC compressor
The engine belt was changed two times, when it was 15,000 km and the second time at 80,000 km. And, I think the belt should be changed every 60,000 km or even more (both times, it was charged from my pocket). The agencies said it's not under warranty. Until now the sound is still there. The agencies didn't do anything regarding this sound. It's really a shame for a new car with with this sound. For your information, this is a sound since I bought the car.The flexible AC pipe was also changed and I don't know why it's damaged (also I replaced from my pocket).
Finally which I would you please to take an immediate action to replace the compressor under the warranty? The weather here is too hot and I can't drive it without AC. I am looking forward to hear from you as soon as possible. Thanks a lot for you help.
Reviewed May 20, 2010
I have owned three different Nissan vehicles in the last 4 years. And as an engineer, there are noted items of poor design as well as poor manufacturing quality. I am done with their poor corporate response. I am done buying Nissan.
Reviewed May 13, 2010
I wrote a paper check out for my May 2010 payment to Nissan Motor Corp. for $323.00. Nissan deducted through account payment $523.00. I did not authorize this amount and I am horrified they can just go into your account and take whatever money they want. As a result, checks in my account are bouncing for insufficient funds and excessive bank fees.
Reviewed May 7, 2010
I own two vehicles which are being financed by NMAC (2010 Armada/2010 Altima). I submitted the direct pay forms to have both car payments directly debited out of my checking account. For the month of April 2010, they took out the payment for one car but not the other. Two days after the due date, I called to inquire as to why the second car note had not been debited. I was advised that the payment had been drafted and I should not worry.
Eight days after my initial call, I called again. This time, I was advised that my payment was passed due. The representative confirmed that they had the correct bank account information for the one car but not the other (which clearly means that whoever inputted the information into their system made a typo). They proceeded to correct it and tell me that I must make the payment ASAP. The issue is that if I made a payment via telephone or their website, I would be charged a fee.
When I asked why the representative could not take my payment over the phone and waive the fee since it was clearly to no fault of my own, I was advised that the fee would be collected from a third party servicer. Therefore, they were not able to waive it. I told the representative that I am now in a bind. If I pay over the phone or website I am penalized, if I send a check it will take 5-10 business days. I was advised to send the check ASAP, they will note their system and as long as it is not received 30 days after the original due date that it would not be reported to the credit bureaus. Due date 4/20/10, check sent 5/3/10. On 5/6/10, they begin to call me harassing me for the payment. I was just informed that I will continue to receive telephone calls until they receive the payment. Now how is any of this my fault? I was proactive in pursuing why they had not drafted the payment. This is unacceptable and disconcerting. I am utterly disgusted with Nissan Motor Acceptance Corporation and how they treat their costumers.
I am extremely upset with the telephone calls I am receiving. They continuously call. They are calling me during my work hours making it extremely difficult for me to concentrate on my work duties. I told them that the check was mailed on 5/3/10, to please notate their system. They will not. I ask to speak to a supervisor. I was on hold for approximately 15 minutes to no avail. I had to waive my lunch hour to try and resolve this situation. Since the purchase of my vehicle, I have paid more than the minimum due. In order to avoid a possible late payment, I opted to have them directly debit the payment. They make an error in inputting the bank account number and they have continuously treated me as if I were delinquent. I am extremely disgusted and upset. I am currently trying to fix my credit and save money to purchase a home. I am utterly petrified that due to NMAC's error causing the payment not being made on the due date, may hinder my chances of being approved for a mortgage.
Reviewed May 6, 2010
My 2002 Nissan had a break part go out that Nissan no longer makes or is it available. Nissan Consumer Affairs said, "Sorry, there is nothing we can do.” Now, I have a truck that I am making payments on that isn’t drivable. The part is the "Load Sending Valve", Part Number 46400-8B400, which is a safety valve that transfers the braking power from the front brakes to the rear brakes when the bed of the truck is loaded with weight. A great safety item, but worthless if you can’t get it replaced.
Reviewed May 4, 2010
Going on the 3rd transmission since July 2009! I too experienced the sound of a vibration, while driving 35-40 MPH. But, before that I spent around $400 while the dealership was trying to figure out what was wrong the the car. When they told me it was transmission problems, I had little faith in what they said since the $400 I spent was all trial and error. But sure enough the transmission went out while on vacation. I paid around $5600 for a new transmission at a different Nissan dealership.
About 7 months later, after the same problems of vibration sound surfaced, I took my car in and needed another (#2) transmission. After the two dealerships tried to get the other to pay, my local dealership put a new transmission in February (No charge to me). After they fixed the transmission it took them a week and 1/2 to figure out why I had a transmission fluid leaking on my garage floor. I took the car back 3 times!
Now 3 months later, the same problem of vibration surfaces a third time! I take my vehicle in and tell them I have been reading on the internet about all of these problems with fluids leaking and ruining the transmission. Could that be it I ask? Well low and behold it is the problem and I need another transmission (#3) and "They are sorry, but that is not covered by Nissan because the transmission leaked and ruined it." "Are you kidding me? " I asked. Nissan get your head out and treat your customers right! How about doing the right thing and recalling this problem? How about training your service department to detect these problems? I am sure you train them to say we are not paying for the problem! Guess what Nissan? I am not paying for it either! This is absolutely the worst vehicle I have ever had! Huge financial loss on this vehicle!
Reviewed May 3, 2010
I received a ticket for $117 on 1/10/09 and mailed the payment in on 1/14/09. Obviously this ticket was sent to Nissan also, without my knowledge. At some point, Nissan paid the ticket too and then started sending me invoices for $162. I contacted Nissan several times regarding this $162 which I did not owe to Nissan. Nissan needed to request a refund from the Dept. of Motor Vehicle who took 2 payments for this one ticket.
The bottom line is that I received a letter from Nissan on 6/12/09 stating that my account had been paid in full and the matter was over. I printed my credit report last week and realized that Nissan has sent this account to TransUnion and Equifax as a "bad debt". This was never a bad debt as I mailed payment in 4 days after I received the ticket. The battle was between Nissan and the DMV.
I want this "bad debt" taken off my credit reports immediately. This has caused my credit scores to go from a perfect score to less than perfect. This is not acceptable. Nissan has defamed my credit and my attorney is ready and willing to file a lawsuit. Repeatedly, I have called Nissan over the past year and several times within the past week. I keep being told that someone will call me back and that this is going to be taken care of , but no one ever calls back and it still has not been resolved. This is a horrible way to do business with the consumer. I am requesting that someone in authority call me back so that this can be resolved before further action has to be taken on my part.
Reviewed May 3, 2010
I think we all have a class action lawsuit regarding 2005 Nissan shuttering when around 60 mph. We have 98,000 miles on it now and shuttering (like you're running over a washboard) and I release the gas and it's normal. We have yet to take ours into a mechanic for fear of the expense! Not sure who to trust and who to take it to!
Reviewed April 28, 2010
I’m filing this complaint because NMAC’s actions are both questionable and criminal. In November 2009 Nissan Motor Acceptance Corp (NMAC) repossessed my vehicle wrongfully, stating that I broke promises in our agreement. Due to being unemployed since 2007, I’ve struggled to make my payments. But in November 2009, I fell behind two months in payments. I informed NMAC of my circumstances and made an agreement with them to make a payment of by November 6, 2009.
I made the agreed upon payment, which was received by NMAC on November 5, 2009 (I have bank records to show that NMAC received the payment on November 5th). NMAC did not credit my account with the agreed upon payment until November 10, 2009. NMAC repossessed my vehicle on November 11th, informing me that their actions were due to my breach in our agreement; at which time I informed them that I had in fact kept our agreement and offered them proof of the date of their receipt of my payment, which they refused to acknowledge.
On November 12th, I spoke with NMAC representative Brandy who told me in order to get my vehicle back, I needed to bring my account up to date by paying the two months back payments owed, in addition to December’s payment since December’s payment was due on November 16th, plus interest owed totaling $1,154.00, which had to be sent via Western Union Quick Collect. I was also required to pay repossession fees charged by Federal Recovery (repossession company) to get my vehicle back, which were approximately $200.00.
Upon satisfying the terms set by NMAC bringing my account up-to-date, NMAC sent a release to Federal Recovery and I took possession of my vehicle on November 13th. Approximately, a week after getting my vehicle back, I received a Notice of Our Plan To Sell Repossessed or Surrendered Motor Vehicle notice, which made no sense since my vehicle had been back in my possession since Nov. 13th. All subsequent payments to NMAC were made on time. Shortly after my December 2009 payment, I started receiving calls from NMAC collection department stating that I was a month behind in my payments and if I didn’t make a payment immediately, they would be reporting negatively on my credit report. I informed them that I was not behind and asked them for a written explanation which I never received.
After repeated calls from the collection department, I asked for a copy of my transaction history so that I could review their accounting. It shows that the $1,154.00 I paid on Nov. 13th was debited to principal on Nov. 17th. On Nov. 19th the following transactions were made to my account:
1. Credit to principal for $1,154.00.2. Debit to Misc. for $72.16.
3. Debit to Misc. for $398.00.
4. Debit to principal for $683.365. Debit to Int. for $0.48.
I was never informed or received any explanation as to the above transactions within my account. I have attempted to resolve this issue many times over the past few months by talking to representatives over the phone and finally sending two letters requesting an explanation of the above transactions including a full disclosure of all Misc. charges. I’ve also requested in writing a copy of the release that they sent to Federal Recovery to release my vehicle after it was repossessed and a copy of our original contract. I have yet to receive any response from NMAC except for continued harassing collection calls. This is just a sampling of the accounting practice and shady conduct of NMAC. I lodged a complaint with the Better Business Bureau regarding this matter on March 24th. NMAC was contacted by the BBB and still have not reached out to resolve this issue, yet they continue their campaign of harassment from the collection department. My car was wrongfully repossessed, costing me additional fees. I have negative credit reporting to credit agencies due to late payments from November 2009 to date for monies that I don't owe.
Reviewed April 26, 2010
I own a 2004 Nissan 350Z Touring Roadster. At 23,000 miles, the clutch was shot. I contacted my local Nissan dealer and they were no help. I then contacted Nissan North America and they had me bring the car back to the dealer and they confirmed that it needed a new clutch.
After much research by reading forums, I realized that this is a problem with many of these vehicles. I have email correspondence starting in September 2009 going back and forth from Nissan North America. In the end, I was told that it was not covered (the car is still under warranty). I even attached a photo and a link to the forum and received a basic, generic form letter response from them.
I can provide all. I don't know where to turn now. I just bought a new clutch and brought the car to Master Tech Transmissions today to have it installed. This is going to cost me anywhere from $1K - $2K to replace. This is a manufacturer defect and should be a recall.
Reviewed April 21, 2010
I am having the same issue which is coolant leaking into the transmission. This is happening a lot. I have a friend who works for Nissan. He told me this occurs a lot but Nissan refuse to do anything about it. I had to replace the radiator twice and do a flush but once the trans gets coolant, it is just a matter of time until the transmission dies which is what happened to me.
The technician told me they should have replaced the transmission once the coolant went into it. Nissan refuse to assist me with the matter and this started when the Pathfinder was at 44,000 miles. Something has to be done. I had to pay $4500. to replace the transmission. I got stranded 280 miles away from home with my family.
Reviewed April 18, 2010
I have the same problem as most of you. My car jerks when the first gear go to second (accelerating/decelerating). I totally support a lawsuit because these problems are factory and just like Toyota fixing their problems, Nissan should also do it. No more Nissan cars in my life!
Reviewed April 14, 2010
On May 26, 2005 I purchased a brand new 2005 Nissan Sentra from ABC Nissan. The car to this date only has 44k miles on it. The car has low mileage and is only 5 years old. The starter is going out on the car. Nissan won't replace or share the cost of the starter. I feel this is unfair. I know there is a limited warranty on the vehicle, but I have never heard of a starter going out on a car that has such low mileage on it. I am quite disappointed in their decision.
I never was able to talk to anyone at Nissan Consumer Affairs. A rep would call, leave a message and no matter how many times I tried to return her call, would get her voice mail each time. She never made any real attempts to talk to me about the issue with my car. Only would leave her name (Shannon) and ask me to call her. As far as I am concerned, this situation was not taken care of professionally whatsoever. I was never asked about it. They only had an email from me regarding the car. ABC told me they wanted $130.00 to check out the car and it would be $565.00 to replace the starter.
I have an excellent mechanic who would only charge $326.00 and asked them to share the cost or cover it. I think it is a defective part and would like to know exactly if this is so. I don't think anyone really cares about this situation. I have a brother who used to sell cars and he even told me this shouldn't be happening. My car salesman at ABC told me this shouldn't be happening with my car. Ed ** at ABC suggested I contact Nissan Consumer Affairs. I want a complaint filed against them. I was never spoken to except at the dealership when they told me I would have to pay for them to look at it and a decision would be made. I am not spending $130.00 for them to look at the car.
I already know what is wrong with it. And their cost to replace it compared to my mechanic's price $565.00 vs $326.00. Nissan wanted $130.00 of my hard earned money and then planned to say no to covering the repair. This was their intent all along and I would be forced to then have them repair it because I know they would tell me they would apply that to the repair. If I have to pay for it, $326.00 is a better price for me. But I think with the car having such low miles on it, this should be covered by Nissan even though the warranty is over.
Reviewed April 11, 2010
I made a payment by check in November 2009. The check was presented to my bank as an ACH on November 24, 2009. On November 25, 2009, the same check was physically presented to my bank and cashed so that the payment of $500.00 was withdrawn from my account twice. I, of course, did not notice until I received my bank statement and went to balance it on December 21, 2009. I immediately called them the next day. I was told they would have to start an investigation and I fax whatever documentation I had.
I faxed it the very next day. I was also told that it would take 7 to 10 business days and with it being the holidays, I knew it would probably take longer. I waited until January 7, 2010 to call back. I was told nothing had been done and that no investigation had been started, but they would start one now and it would take 7 to 10 business days and would I re-fax my information because they didn't have it. To make a long story short, I have called a bunch of times, gotten absolutely no where and my money is just gone. They did not give it back and they did not apply it to my account. I'm still fighting to get my money back, so I can get rid of my Xterra and so I won't have to deal with this company again. I have lost $500.00.
Reviewed April 9, 2010
After filing my complaint, I was contacted by a regional manager of Nissan named Nicole. She asked if I had any proof of maintenance on my car. I told her that I could get some of them (6 years of receipts). She assured me that whatever I had was fine. I just had to show that the car was maintained, and to fax in what I could. I was able to get a history of 14 oil changes from Penzoil alone, and four receipts from my mechanic, none of the oil changes exceeded the amount stated in the manufacturer’s handbook!
But I was told that since the car was not under warranty and due to "insufficient maintenance" that it was my fault the engine needs to be replaced at under 75,000 miles! And they would not help out financially any cost! This is criminal! They know that their product is faulty! They do not want to fix it, and worse, they blame it on the customers! I've taken great care of all my cars! Never have I had to replace an engine after only 7 years! I am going to seek a consumer lawyer for help. How do I contact the class action law suit lawyers about this? Don't they know what Toyota is going through?
When my car stops for no reason in the middle of a busy intersection and almost causes accidents because of a cheap poorly built engine, that thousands of other year make and models have the same problems too, this is a major safety issue! This needs to be taken as a serious problem and needs to be addressed ASAP before somebody dies! I will never buy a Nissan ever again if they do not take actions to correct the problem! This is bad business! I want a new engine, or a safe car to drive! I have 3 kids that I will not drive around in the car with. It’s too dangerous!
Reviewed April 1, 2010
I received a phone call on my cell from a customer service rep stating that my lease payment was late. I told her this could not be true. She said, "Well, it is." And being that I do not pay the bill, I started to doubt my statement. Then I proceeded to tell her that the wife pays the bill and I would check with her. The rep replied, "Well, I suggest she calls back real soon; and oh, by the way, you have been late 1 - 90 day 3 - 60 day and 2 - 30 day." Then respectfully I told her "Now I know your information is totally incorrect." There is no way, and of course, she replied, "Well, this is what it is." Of course, her phone mannerism during this whole conversation was as pleasant as dealing with an arrogant disrespecting drunk in a bar.
I will say I had to really had to hold my composure, thinking well maybe I am wrong until I get all the facts. She gave me the phone number with a extension number. Then I talked to the wife, and we called this number and left countless messages with no response. Finally, we talked to another rep and another rep and another with the same answers but with a little more tact.
After countless hours putting together the "facts" to prove to this so-called corporation that they are wrong, I now after 2 months or so have a letter they sent stating in not so many words that they were wrong saying "We are able to confirm your account has been updated." That's all this so-called worldwide corporation has to say, and in this economic time, the way I see it ruins me. If anything could be done, it should be.
Reviewed March 24, 2010
The last person I spoke to was Abdiel on 12/23/09 at12:15 pm. He said my truck is still in repossession status as "your account has been canceled. Once you pay the balance due, and then you start making you monthly $297.88 payment until paid off." Payoff is $8853.75.
I have made the additional payments for the balance due and still have a repossession man knocking on my front door. How can this be legal? Apparently, this is happening to more than just me. This is just poor business. With the economy the way it is, this should not be happening, especially when money is being paid on the account and received by Nissan.
Reviewed March 23, 2010
My husband purchased a Nissan Maxima 2005 which, when we separated, he took with him. It appeared he had not been making the payments when he dropped he car off and stated that NMAC was coming to repossess. Immediately, I called to make payment arrangements to get car caught up. This was a very difficult and frustrating task. Eventually I reached a Ms. B. She stated I could make double payments for 6 months and the car would be current. It was also told to me that $13,000 was left on the car.
After 4 months of double payments, I called to explain that I would only be able to make a double payment because work was slow. At that point I was advised that because payment wasn't made within 30 days, I was set for repossession. Weird thing is I made a double payment 12/01 for December’s payment and 12/30 for January. So as of December I was current until February. They were not willing to bend on this, they stated I promised double payment every month and there are 30 days in a month; therefore, I was in default. After being threatened, called names, and essentially talked to like I was substandard, an arrangement was made, but they were still adding repossession fees on the account.
Then it turns out after paying $13,000.00 called for payoff amount and a little less than $7,000.00 was still owed. They had misled me on the balance owed. Because you are not given statements or anything in writing, I was stuck. The only thing to do is pay it. Took a second job to get it paid. Sent them all the money generated by this second job and at the end still owing $2,000.00. I called to ask for one last arrangement. My second job assignment completed and would not have that extra money. Well, guess, you can guess.
Called and I am delinquent again. I've given them over $18,000.00 in a little over a year. The original loan was not to be paid off until July, but I'm delinquent. Supervision added payments subtracted from owed and decided that I was delinquent. I advised her to review payment history and she would see I have paid more than a monthly payment every month, so how was I delinquent? We have no rights; we have to pay what they tell us to and have to answer to no one.
I've purchased 7 Nissans and this one is my last. I have three children and they will not purchase Nissan. Let’s start making companies accountable. Let’s have laws protecting those who fall on hard times. I've clearly made an effort and have worked really hard to fulfill an obligation that my husband couldn't. Doesn't that count for something? After all they would not have collected what was owed if I hadn't. No used car sells for $20,000 at auction. This has been a huge amount of stress, which has affected my health. It is hard to feel comfortable going out to your car knowing you've done the right things and still be afraid your car is going to be gone. Also, to be talked to in such a way is just unnecessary and unforgivable.
Reviewed March 22, 2010
I had been having this grinding with my brakes for at least a month or two, so since I have always had problems with my car from the first day I bought it. First, it was my tires, all of them has had a flat and has been plugged by Nissan except the 1 tire that I bought, whenever I would take my car in for routine check they gave me poor service. I always complained about the service I got from them, so I took my car to Dobbs and had my oil change and had them to look at my brakes and if they needed servicing to please do so. After they checked my brakes, they said that my brakes were fine that it was my master cylinder to take it back to the dealers.
I did gave them the work sheet from Dobbs, they look it over, checked the car and said that it was not my master cylinder and that my brakes were fine that it had a little over a half of pad on them, but my car kept right on grinding and making loud noises when I would brake until Friday, March 19, I was coming home from work and came to make a stop at a light and my brakes were not working which cause me to run into the back of an SUV and tear up the front end of my car. I only hit my head, my air bags did not deplored, my bumper, the hood radiator, air conditioner, grille, front lamps,head lamps, heater and fender.
Reviewed March 19, 2010
In September of 2009, I surrendered my car Nissan Sentra 2008 to Kings Nissan located at Coney Island Ave. Brooklyn, NY 11235 1(718) in exchange for another Nissan car. My car was in perfect shape and nothing was missing. A few months later on Dec 08, 2009, I received a bill from Nissan Motor Acceptance co. for the amount of $197.22 and a day later on Dec 9 2009, I received another bill from Vital Recovery Services, Inc. 1(866)312-5580 in the amount of $741.57.
I tried to talk to both parties but no luck. They're talking about some dents that I did not have and missing keys that I surrendered to Kings Nissan and have paper work to prove it. I probably had some minor bumper scratches but it had to be covered by either Kings Nissan or Nissan Motor Acceptance co., because I received a letter from them saying I didn't have to pay anything for excess wear and tear ("We will pay it off no matter how much you owe") if you buy or lease another Nissan car which I did.
Now Nissan Motor Acceptance co is trying to tell me that they have nothing to do with Kings Nissan and they're saying that Kings Nissan is not working for them and it is my responsibility to make sure the car is in a good shape. How can I do that if I can neither lease nor surrender any car directly to Nissan Motor Acceptance, but must use some company "they don't work with"? If Kings Nissan failed to deliver the car in a good shape, why am I who being held responsible for it? Now, I have two bills. The original one was $197.22 and a say later my case was placed for collection with Vital Recovery and now it is $741.57
Reviewed March 12, 2010
I recently relocated to Alabama from another state. To receive a tag and registration from Alabama I was informed that either I need to provide a clear title or have the holder of the title obtain an Alabama title. I called Nissan Motor Acceptance Corporation on March 2, 2010 to request this to occur and provided them with my new address and a fax number to the motor vehicle office in Decatur, Alabama.
I was informed the fulfillment of this request would take 3 to 6 days to occur. On March 12, 2010, the fax still had not arrived at the motor vehicle office so I called them again inquiring when the fax would be sent. This time, the individual indicated that it would take up to 30 days to have the information faxed and I told him that was unacceptable. I asked to the speak to a supervisor and was given the same runaround. In this day and age, I find it impossible that this request should and will take more than 30 days.
One irony is that I received my March loan statement within the 6 day time frame at my new address. A side issue certainly not intended to be a racial comment, is that two of the 3 individuals I talked to on the phone have a very heavy accent which caused me to constantly ask them to repeat, what they were saying. Nissan Motor Acceptance Corporation staff lied to me originally and because of their poor service, I now have a vehicle without the proper tag and registration within the time allowed by Alabama law.
Reviewed March 10, 2010
I called them in November to see if I could get an extension for December, so I would have extra money for Christmas. They said of course. They said they would send me something to sign. I never received it! I forgot about it, because I never received any mail from the. So I thought it was okay. Then I got a call from them asking for a payment in January. I am crying and upset because I never received the paper. They got it straightened out, and so, I was cleared. They reported it 30 days past due on my credit report!
When I called them up, they said I should have read the second affidavit, because they stated on it that I will still be reported as 30 days past due! That is absurd! Their mistake, and I have to pay for it for the next 7 years! I didn't read the small print, because I didn't think they would screw me over! They did! Do not use NMAC! They suck, and they will rip you off!
Reviewed March 6, 2010
Well, Nissan recall 2008 010 540,000 vehicle for brake and fuel gauge issue. My truck is 2005 with fuel gauge issue. They do not want to recall my truck that has the same issue of 2008 truck.
Reviewed March 3, 2010
I totaled a 2009 Nissan Versa on January 22. Within a few weeks, my insurance company paid NMAC the pay-off for the total loss vehicle. The insurance company has been unable to pay me the balance because Nissan has not released the title. Nissan has had their money for over a month now, but I am still waiting. I've called multiple times, and everyone I speak with passes me around and no one can tell me where the title is. The accident created a lot of other expenses and I need the insurance money to pay off my bills.
Reviewed March 2, 2010
Transmission went out. I took it to Nissan and they told me the radiator is faulty and leaked into the transmission. Googled the issue and a great deal of people are having the same issues. Nissan will not do anything about this.
Reviewed Feb. 23, 2010
I received a notice dated February 10, 2010, saying that I needed to pay $491.09 by Feb 20 or it would be sent to a collection agency. The letter was sent to #522 apartment. Mine is #5227. My lease on that car ended Aug 29, 2009 and I got a statement stating that I have fulfilled my obligation.
So I called them and was told that I owed property taxes for 2009. I said I had never paid for property taxes on a lease vehicle before so why was I now? I couldn't ever get a clear explanation except for the fact that I was sent two affidavits last year and never returned them. Since I didn't sign and return them, I owe property taxes on the lease I had. I asked to speak to a manager many times. I was told one would call me back but no one called.
I have said how can I be responsible for an affidavit which I never got in the mail? He said I should have called, but how would I even know that I needed to call? No manager will call and I apparently still owe the money. I will never lease with them again. They have horrible customer service especially when they didn't fix my data for my apartment correctly into their system. It is not my fault.
Reviewed Feb. 23, 2010
I also see that someone here had problems with Mike at NMAC collections. I have a 2006 Nissan 350z, my dream car. When I bought the car, I was coming out of a bad break up and needed a pick-me-up, and this car did that 100%. I paid $36,000 at 9.5 % interest through NMAC but at the time, I didn’t care, I was making good bank. I had it for 3 years and two jobs. I started to fall behind as the economy buckled and my commissions dwindled atop my salary. My $723.00 a month payment was too much and I was about a month behind for 5 months. I lost my job, collected unemployment, and decided to move to the East from CA. The whole time, I would stay in full contact with NMAC and every week, I would make payments of 100-450 dollars.
After establishing here in NJ, I again contacted NMAC and informed them of my payment process and how I would be getting caught up in a month or two. On Friday, I made 2 payments and talked to a lady who said, “Your account is fine and thank you for making your payments, we understand your struggle, just keep us fully informed and you have no worries!” On Monday, I walked out to an empty lot and my car was repossessed! Fire ran through my veins and I’ll spare you the long story but then after talking to Mike at NMAC, he also dangled the dollar factor over me and maliciously played with my emotions and well being. I scrambled and borrowed dollars to get my car back from repossession and then I wrote, called and faxed NMAC 18 letters of complaints about their due process and malicious activity but I got zero responses. I called NMAC in India/Texas and talked to everyone I could but to no avail.
F for Nissan and its whole staff of unprofessionals. I understand that I had a debt to pay and I was and will take care of it. But what they do and did was predatory and malicious. After 1 week, Mike called me back demanding more dollars and if I didn’t pay right now, that he is sending the repossessed unit and for me not to leave town or he will file a criminal case against me. This guy must have super bad karma.
Everyone at NMAC will tell me a different story whether it be I'm fine and up to date or the car is out for repossession. They make me sick and I wish I could sue them since I am now paranoid and anxiety runs through me at night just thinking that they are such tricksters. My credit sucks now due to the 1st repossession. I can't re-finance, I can’t trade in, and I can’t do anything other than sit and scratch together my funds each month to avoid this anguish and stress.
Even last week, he called me to tell me that he had already put my car again out for repossession, 24 days late and that same day, I paid my balance. I never want to hear or talk to this guy again. I park my car far away and in the dark just so I feel a little better when I sleep. I am on time with my payments now but it’s painful. Mike told me that he "has it out for me!” and "couldn’t wait for it to go past due again!” I mean, is this even legal? I would love to take him and NMAC to court and press charges. I have paid 37 months at $723.00 for almost 27 grand and owe about 20 grand still. I would love to see NMAC go belly up and go back to Japan and never hear from them again. I love my 350z but despise NMAC. Sorry if that is brutal but you should hear my recorded calls from NMAC collections and how they toy with me.
Reviewed Feb. 18, 2010
I paid $600.00 for gas tank to be dropped and fuel sensor replaced because the fuel light was always on empty, and the DTE (distance till Empty) indicator stopped working and just flashed. The fuel gauge would go from half full to empty in a matter 5 minutes from starting vehicle. The difference between my experience and the rest I have read is that I had a gum out service performed at Wal-Mart for $40.00, and exactly 10 minutes and 7 miles later the fuel indicator light came on and the DTE stopped working.
Four months later I have a foul egg smell coming from exhaust .Nissan Dealer recommends air induction service because error code shows problem with catalytic convertors, which if they need to be replaced will be $3,980.00 because the manifold would have to be replaced as well. So did anyone else start having the fuel issues after having a gum out service or was mine a time fluke? It’s expensive repair if the catalytic convertor needs to be replaced.
Reviewed Feb. 7, 2010
It's about dealer part only. I went to Firestone auto shop to get my pathfinder catalytic converter replaced. I went ahead and left it there finding out later on that the part that I needed is dealer part only, which means it can only be bought only with the dealer. The problem is it's 900 dollars and I needed two. I feel that they're overpriced with labor and all it's going to go up $2300, that's with labor at Firestone. I can't imagine if I went and go to a Nissan dealer, it would probably cost more. Hope you guys shed some light on this. Thank you.
Reviewed Feb. 1, 2010
Overpaid property tax by $297. Requested refund and received $179 back with no explanation to the shortage.
Reviewed Jan. 19, 2010
In October 2008 we contacted NMAC and told them we were filing for chapter 7. We asked about what we needed to do to reaffirm our lease. NMAC said just keep making your payments. We made every payment on time, never late. We have had many loans/leases through NMAC over the years and have always paid as agreed. We would like this negative report removed or reversed from Equifax, Experian, and Transunion. This negative error on NMAC’s part has caused problems with re-establishing credit, employment, and insurance, not to mention the stress that is involved. Our credit report for over 20 years has been usually over 700 beacons; due to some unfortunate events we had to file chapter 7. We would like this matter corrected a.s.a.p. I would like to be contacted via e-mail and by phone.
Reviewed Jan. 11, 2010
When I called NMAC, they admitted to the error on their part and said they would contact CA DMV and pay the fees and follow up with me when that was done as I mentioned it was urgent because of the temporary WA registration. I did not hear back from anyone.
I called NMAC again, only to get hung up on twice. No one tried to call me back! Finally, I got a hold of another customer service, whom after explaining the circumstances, had to transfer me to supervisor. My notes have this information, as far as I know. The supervisor apologized for the wrong info another rep told me who would take care of my problem. Supervisor said they cannot, it's our of their hands because they do not have ownership any longer.
I still don't have my title and am highly frustrated that NMAC won't take any responsibility for this mistake. After the amount of money I poured into this company, once I paid off, they hardly would speak to me on the phone. I am looking into taking this a step further legally. As I have fully paid for a vehicle yet, do not have a title from NMAC. Thank you reading this.
Reviewed Jan. 7, 2010
I called NMAC, and spoke with Richard, who advised that the repairs were not up to their standards, as the repairs were not done at the dealership. I assured Richard that there was no damage to the vehicle. He advised that I could get a re-inspection and that he would accept the lower of the two estimates. I wanted to challenge the inspection, however the car had since been moved from NY to Georgia. I assured him, I was not paying the invoice, and would look to take them to arbitration in NY, pursuant to the terms of the lease.
A week later, NMAC lowered the invoice down to $534, which would have been further reduced to $34, when they factor in the $500 "Nissan Owner Loyalty Waiver", but as a matter of principle, refused to pay. I then sought the help of State Farm Insurance, who went out and re-inspected the vehicle. Their appraiser went to look at the vehicle which was sitting in the lot at an auto auction. The re-inspection came back with a zero dollar estimate for repairs. I'm sending that zero dollar estimate off to NMAC, with a copy of this complaint. Has anybody else experienced this sort of attempted extortion?
Reviewed Dec. 28, 2009
I slid on a patch of black ice, slid through a yard, hit a bank on like a side front hit, and hit so hard it flipped my truck on its roof. I ended up upside down, with a severe gash on my head, and a severe concussion and major memory loss. And through it all, my airbags did not deploy!
Reviewed Dec. 24, 2009
Fuel sending unit is broken.
Reviewed Dec. 22, 2009
In August 2005, I purchased a Nissan Sentra and maintained on time payments for two years with very little difficulty. However, in 2007, things had gotten a little harder for me financially, so I enlisted into the military. I informed Nissan that I required a few months of deferred payments. To my knowledge, they had obliged me and everything was okay - that is, until my return from training. I had not received any correspondence from them stating that I was still being charged every month. But knowing that I had monthly car notes to take care of, I called to set up a payment system where the funds could be debited from my account. Everything was set up (so I thought, once again).
As I entered into my first command, I had a "feeling" that something was not right; and due to being stationed on a ship, we were on deployment when I made a call to check on things, and that's when I was slapped with almost $4,000 in charges. I do not know what happened between the few months, but I knew it was not right. However, because I wanted to resolve the issue, I began sending money orders every day while on deployment. It was very stressful because no matter how many payments I was making, it wasn't enough; and being that I was across the country, I could not deal with them directly and they began harassing my family. So I eventually told NMAC where the car was and to go pick it up. This was early 2008.
I still had every intention of paying or at least settling with them, but they told me it was all or nothing. Being that I was later discharged (medically) from the military, I was unemployed with no means of income at the time I could not make the payment in full. So as a result, I was threatened with a lawsuit and I had not heard anything back from NMAC until a couple of weeks ago (almost a year later) saying that they have a case against my stepfather (listed buyer) and myself. So again to resolve this issue, I agreed to pay $100 a month for the next six months; however, I feel that I am at a lost because I am paying for a vehicle I do not have and could have maintained had NMAC not caused so much trouble.
Reviewed Dec. 18, 2009
I have had nothing but problems with these people who have now mistakenly dinged our credit twice. They mess up just about every payment I make and I am constantly getting phone calls at 8PM, telling me I am more than 30 days past due. But of course, they are about to close so there is nobody there to talk to. I have had problems every month for a year now and have had it with the non-English speaking people in India. I have tried mailing in payments, automatic payments and payments over the phone. Nothing seems to work. They have lost my payments, posted them to the wrong accounts and others they have no record of at all, but my bank does. Funny?
Beware of these people and I encourage everyone to post their complaints so something can be done about this. I almost didn't because I didn't feel like going through the effort, but it will do us all good for when we are fighting with these people to pull up this site and read it to these people who act like you are the only one with this problem.
Reviewed Dec. 17, 2009
I was awakened out of my sleep by my brother telling me that my car was not outside. I thought someone had stolen it because there was no reason for me to think that it was repossessed. I then called the Nissan office and that's when all my agony started. I spoke with Greg who told me that they had repossessed my car due to lack of payment. I explained to Greg that my job closed down which at the time I was working at Circuit City. I then explained to Greg that I have a job now and that I had receive no letter informing me my car was in repossession. I, in fact, received a letter thanking me for my Nov. 5 payment and my next payment of $1,200 was due on Dec. 15, 2009. He implied that I could pay them the $1,800 to get the car out of repossession and rudely hung up the phone. I then called back and spoke with Mike. He was also unprofessional and very rude.
I then asked him if there was anyone I could talk with that could help me get my car. He replied the only way you can get your car is if you have $15,000 to pay it off. I was shocked. Now, it has gone from $1,800 to $15,000. I asked for a supervisor or someone over him. He said they all will tell you the same. I was then connected to Walter, the worst of them all. Walter told me why I am wasting time and why they should give me my car back so I can continue to pay late. He said the best thing for me to do is to get the money or try to refinance the car. I then asked if there was anyone over him, the CEO or president and he replied he is in Japan and has bigger things to deal with than me. Now, I have no car and my job is at risk from having no transportation to get there. I felt that they did not work with me and really did not care. I remember months ago when the jobs of the Nissan corporation was at risk and the government had to help them out.
Reviewed Dec. 14, 2009
Never lease an Infiniti or Nissan! Looking for attorneys and plaintiffs to join a class action suit against Holman Infiniti and Nissan Motor Acceptance Company for fraud. My name is Anthony and I'm no one special, just another guy trying to raise a family. Now I'm one of the latest in a long list of people being screwed by Nissan Motor Acceptance Company (NMAC), the finance arm behind Nissan and Infiniti. You see, I made the unfortunate mistake of leasing an Infiniti from Holman Infiniti in Maple Shade, NJ. I loved the car and enjoyed driving it for three years, during which time I took pristine care of it - performed all scheduled maintenance, installed four brand new tires and even had it professionally detailed once a year. Now the lease term is up so I contacted NMAC, who sent an inspector to my home, to check for excessive wear and tear.
The inspector found a few light scratches in the rear bumper, a curb scrape on one wheel and a 1/2 crack in a plastic stiffener under the front bumper that is in such a nondescript location it was not even painted. Furthermore, the crack was leftover from repair work that was done by Holman Infiniti themselves a few months ago. I never concerned myself with the crack as it was minor and had no impact on the car functionally nor cosmetically. The inspector informed me that I had to get these items corrected or I would be charged $864 for them when I return the car. While I believed these items were well within normal wear and tear for a three year old car, I obliged and brought the car to a local body shop. They buffed the scratches, smoothed the scrape in the wheel and plastic welded the small crack in the stiffener.
I then called NMAC for a re-inspection and much to my disbelief, they informed me that none of the repairs were done to their satisfaction and I still owed $864! Effectively, if I didn't pay them the money to fix it, it would never be fixed good enough. So I have to pay for repairs that were already completed for a car that we all know is going straight to lease auction and will never actually get (re)repaired anyway! This was a week ago and I have since been trying to get someone, anyone, at Nissan or Infiniti to be reasonable; but I have been stonewalled the entire way. Even the manager, Dexter, at Holman Infiniti was apparently trained to play the game. He looked at the car himself, feigned support and offered to contact NMAC on my behalf. He then informed me, "They said no. There's nothing I can do." I asked him about the crack left over by his body shop and he agreed to talk to them on my behalf as well, but then gave me the same rehearsed answer - they said no, there's nothing I can do.
I did some additional research on what my options were and found that I am certainly not alone. In fact, the Consumer Affairs website has an entire section dedicated to complaints about NMAC leased vehicle returns! www.consumeraffairs.com/automotive/nissan_lease.html. The stories' details vary, but the net result is always the same: NMAC routinely finds hundreds or thousands of dollars worth of excessive wear and tear on just about every car they get back, no matter what the condition. Even cars with clean inspection reports get invoiced for damage not initially found by the inspector. In one case, they caused the damage themselves once the car was back on their lot by backing a truck into it and then told the leaser they were responsible for it! They provide no means of disputing these fraudulent claims and then strong-arm the consumers into paying by threatening collection actions against them - leaving the poor consumers no choice.
There are even accounts where they agreed to reduce the amount due, but then still placed a write-off of the difference on the customer's credit! This is nothing less than fraud and racketeering against consumers who have little means or recourse to fight it. And this is not the full extent of Nissan Motors' aggressive bullying tactics. So if you are like me and NMAC has or is trying to extort money out of you, please join our fight! If you are an attorney who wants to help out, please contact me.
Reviewed Dec. 7, 2009
Reviewed Nov. 29, 2009
I had to replace a gas sensor in the gas tank, replaced the front drive shaft, computer module. The engine light was on saying my catalytic converter was going up, and I'm having a problem with my transmission. I have noticed a lot of other people having the same problem. The same day I was getting my truck fixed, I noticed another Nissan truck being fixed for the same reason ( the computer module). His wouldn't start and mine would start, then not run and it left me broken down till I got it started and made it into the shop. It was over 1000 dollars, not including the the cost of a rental car. The engine light is still on and my transmission is getting worse. I need to bring it back in but I'm afraid of what it's going to cost.
Reviewed Nov. 18, 2009
Reviewed Nov. 10, 2009
Reviewed Oct. 21, 2009
Reviewed Oct. 21, 2009
Reviewed Oct. 13, 2009
Reviewed Oct. 9, 2009
Reviewed Oct. 3, 2009
Reviewed Sept. 25, 2009
Reviewed Sept. 23, 2009
Reviewed Aug. 28, 2009
I purchased 04 350z on 7/14/09 with a good down payment. After several phone calls, I never received the Carfax so I tried to return the car 4 days later but the manager refused and said it was too late and that the bank already paid them, so I couldn't do much. I brought the car for service oil change and to check the seat belt light which was always on. Service told me I needed to replace the airbag part. The car was obviously not serviced or checked for major defect before I purchased the car. I was driving the car for a month and could have had serious injury or death to family, friends and myself. I confronted a manager and demanded within my rights for the Carfax and received it on 8/28/09. My car is waiting to be repaired for part. My salesman didn't have the courtesy to approach me or return any of my calls, just hid in the office corner. Most of sales and their managers were very rude to me and also made sarcastic comments as I was leaving. Ricky, in service, was the only honest person. Please warn other car shoppers to always get Carfaxes and to bypass that dealership! I wish I did. I had to purchase a service contract for $2000.00.
Reviewed Aug. 28, 2009
I will never finance a vehicle through Nissan Motor Acceptance Corporation again. I set my account up to have my monthly auto loan payment deducted from my checking account on the 15th of the month. On August 17th, I noticed that the amount had not been deducted nor applied to my account, so I contacted NMAC who has their customer service representative service in India. I asked the representative about the automatic deduction and she stated that it was scheduled to be effective September 15th so I would need to go ahead and pay online or via telephone.
So as to not make my account past due, I went to their Bill Matrix site and paid a $5 service fee to have the payment made out of my checking account. On August 18th, I looked online at my account again and there were two debits for $749 each. One was from Bill Matrix and the other was from NMAC. I called customer service in India back again and they said that they made a mistake and that it did come out on August 15th, but that the good news is, I wouldn't owe another payment until October 15th. I told them that I wanted a refund of one of the payments to which they told me they couldn't do that until the payment is officially deducted from my checking account.
When I tried to explain to them that having 2 payments come out of my account could result in my account being overdrawn, they stated that if there weren't enough money in the account, it would just be declined and sent back to NMAC. I was so frustrated after this being my second time on the phone dealing with this that I hung up. I immediately cancelled my automatic bill pay deduction with NMAC because clearly they don't know what they are doing. The next day, I called NMAC back and said I wanted one of the payments refunded to me. I was informed that it would take 3 to 5 business days to process and I would receive a check in the mail. It has now been 10 business days, no check, and my account is still showing two payments and a due date of October 15th. It is clear to me that NMAC has no intention of refunding a payment. I do not have the energy to deal with them anymore.
I am frustrated that Nissan has made the decision to outsource their customer service to India, and has clearly not properly trained its associates. I will never go through NMAC again and will never again buy a Nissan vehicle.
Reviewed Aug. 28, 2009
My check engine light keeps coming on. I changed the crankshaft sensor and the speed sensor several times, but the light still remains on. The car cuts off at traffic lights. It’s a very dangerous situation.
Reviewed Aug. 24, 2009
I was late with my lease payments. When I took the lease, I was in well over my head, but I took it due to medical needs. I have congestive heart failure and I am scheduled for heart surgery within the coming weeks. My issue is I paid Nissan as instructed, but found that my car has been towed to another state. It has been towed to an island that the average person cannot travel to, nor do they choose to do so. I have paid Nisan, but cannot get my car, even though when I first contacted them, they stated my car, as all cars, was taken to a nearby location. This was a lie and a cheat. Now, they will also be charging exorbitant fees for storage fee. Does a car company have the right to leave a person with a heart problem in this situation?
Reviewed Aug. 19, 2009
I put my car into the service center and the car stayed there for 18 days. I was forced to rent a car for those days. I also had contact with Nissan Consumer Affairs (Justin **) which was a horrible experience. Due to the lack of communication between those people, I suffered a financial situation and feel that I should be compensated in some fashion.
Reviewed Aug. 18, 2009
I received 2 voice messages from NMAC on Monday, 8/10/09, with regard to contacting them and coming up with a payment solution. One at home and one at my job. In addition, I received a letter stating I had to contact NMAC because I was behind with May 2009 payment. I fell a little behind because I suffered a massive heart attack last year and medical bills took its toll on me. I called on Tuesday, 8/12, to make a payment by Friday, 8/14. I was given the runaround. My truck was not scheduled for repossession yet as per the NMAC's representative. NMAC would not accept payment on the 14th and insisted I make a payment of $540 by the end of 8/11. Mind you, I am at work! The last time I spoke to a NMAC rep was on 8/11 at approximately 4:30PM.
On Wednesday, 8/12, at 4:00AM, my vehicle was being repossessed. The tow truck rang my bell. When I called NMAC at 9:00AM on the 12th, the payment was now $1,000+. The whole process of being repo was unnecessary and unprofessional. To make a long story short, this incident was uncalled for and very unprofessional. Is this the solution that NMAC came up with? In addition to paying Nissan $1000, I asked several times if there were any additional payments I needed to know about and was told "no" by several reps from Nissan. When I got to the towing place, I had to come up with an additional $75. $25 for each day of impoundment from August 12-14 (the car was impounded at 4:00AM).
I picked up the vehicle at 10:00AM, when the towing company opened. Why was I charged for 3 days when it was there for only 2? They would not release my vehicle until I paid. I financed the car in 2005 and had a very good payment history with NMAC. This is my last year of paying my truck off. I do not know why I was subjected to this kind of treatment. I feel that my civil and constitutional rights were violated.
Reviewed Aug. 16, 2009
I purchased a new 2006 Nissan Armada from Performance Nissan in Duarte. CA. At 38,000 miles, the Armada has been in for major service 10 times. From a time period starting from 5-30-2008 to today's current date, I have had the radiator replaced, battery, radiator fan and motor, no brakes, VDC re-programmed, fuel pump, AC condenser replaced, no brakes again, the master vacuum assy replaced, front bumper replaced due to no brakes, and exhaust manifold leak. I just took my family on vacation to Las Vegas and found out my cruise control is not working. We also reported a speedometer problem, but Nissan could not find any thing wrong. I have all my service receipts and a spreadsheet with all the above breakdowns.
I am currently working with Nissan to see what they will do for me. I have 3 children and my wife is the primary driver of the Armada. I do not want the Armada anymore. It is not safe! I had to purchase this 2006 Armada because the 2005 Armada I bought from Performance Nissan had a safety belt breakdown only 3 weeks after I bought it. The dealer had to lemon law it and had me pick another Armada from his lot. This is not a safe car. I have a file number with Nissan; it is **. Please help us, we are making our monthly payments and feel taken advantage of.
Reviewed Aug. 8, 2009
I wrote two letters regarding Nissan Altima, but there’s no response from Nissan Consumer Affairs! I received a card for my feedback. You got to be kidding?! Ever try to respond to anything on your Nissan Consumer Affairs pages? I think that you guys are beginning to believe your own advertising, and that's dangerous. The "valued customer" statement is getting a little worn out. Try "dear suckers". At this point, I don't really care whether you respond or not.
Reviewed Aug. 8, 2009
We purchased a 2003 used Nissan Altima in September 2006. After a month, the car started shutting off at the traffic lights. We brought the car to Team Nissan of Lithia Springs dealership. They serviced the car and replaced a head gasket. We had to pay for the service. At this point, we asked to be put into a car more reliable for the same amount of $15,000. They told us no.
The next month or so, the car did the same thing - shutting of the at the light and was not running well. We again took the car back to the dealership and explained to them that this car is giving us serious problems. One of the dealers came outside to our car and asked us if we have gap insurance. We told him yes. He then proceeded to tell that we may need to go ahead and blow up the car. We told him that we can't do that. We just wanted them to put us to something else.
We left the car at the service center while they put us in a car of the lot. We also had to pay for them to look at it. Well, the car kept on giving us problems. We ended up taking the car to a NAPA auto shop after the car started to give us more problems. We had to pay over $600 in repairs for sensors and other things. We were unable to get to work like we would, taking the bus and getting this car repair became very stressful and very expensive.
We received the CARFAX four months of having the car. It stated that the car was from a flood area in New Orleans and it was in a serious rear-ended accident. We decided to take the car to CarMax to get into something different. The guy told us that this car had extensive mechanical and frame work to it. We were devastated.
Before having the car for a year, while driving on the highway, the engine blew out. The next day, we had the car towed to the dealership. They told us they'll put in a new engine for $3,000 which we did not have. We stop paying on a car that we essentially did not did use. During all this, we keep in touch with Nissan but all they could tell me was that I purchased the car so I have to pay for it. Now, I have this $1,400 car on my credit that needs to be removed. We've spoken to managers after manager but to no avail.
Reviewed Aug. 4, 2009
The head gasket needed replacement along with machining to head. The emission control valve needed replacement. The engine oil is leaking internally through the exhaust, ruining catalytic converter leading to lack of power. Engine replacement is needed.
Reviewed Aug. 2, 2009
I bought a brand new Nissan Navarra pick up. It met an accident sometime in August 2008. I've been informing so many websites of Nissan but only one from Nissan people responded to my complaint of non-functioning airbags in spite of severe impact that lost 2 lives including my father-in-law. These people from Nissan just tell me that the said accident did not meet the requirements to trigger the airbags. They just based their conclusion on the pictures I submitted, and nobody came to inspect in actual if the conclusion is correct. My question is, is it fair to just conclude that way without seeing the actual damage of the car? They even just advised me to use my insurance to cover expenses incurred in the accident.
Reviewed July 21, 2009
I purchased a vehicle from a private seller and when I purchased this vehicle, the title was clean with no liens on the title. I registered the vehicle, received my plates and had the car insured and within a month, my car was repossessed because according to Nissan, it had a lien on the vehicle. The lien was from the original owner and once I got a CARFAX and a VIN check, the title had been transferred twice before I transferred the title under my name. I also would like to add that when I got VIN check from the DMV, it states that the lien was closed 4 months before the title was under my name. What can I do to get my car back?
Reviewed July 18, 2009
I leased a car with Nissan for 42 months. I was paying for insurance which I cancelled a month later. They told me that almost at the end of my payment, I should stop payment, which was about 3 months before the end of the lease, if I am buying the car. Almost at the end, I wrote a letter which they did not reply back, problem number one. Secondly, I keep calling them about information on what to do about the car, no one has given me the right information. On 5-17-09, I went to Nissan on Route 22 in New Jersey. They called the bank, the bank told them that my payoff was $19,950 so I took the paper to my credit union. The credit union keeps calling them for additional information. It took them about 3 weeks to fax the paper and the actual total, like they said, it was higher than what was given at first. I need the difference from my lease. Nissan service is zero. The supervisor needs more training; they do not know how to speak with a customer. The lady was so rude. My credit score went down more. My payoff amount went high because they did not respond to me on time. I cannot have a low interest rate because of Nissan.
Reviewed July 17, 2009
I purchased my 3rd Nissan and my credit was in the top tier. Due to the housing slump then the crash, I found myself 2 payments behind. In 11-07 & 12-07, I called the Motor acceptance who responded that they would place my two payments at the end of the contract. They faxed me a copy of the amended contract with a pay off date of 10-11. I then made timely payments for the next 14 months, believing in the integrity of Nissan. I felt secure in making monthly payments for 14 months, at which time they repossessed my SUV. Their answer to accepting my 14 months of $500.00 was credited for late charges and interest, which they will not give me a breakdown of exact rates, and nothing toward the principal. I do feel that some Nissan employee has lied to their supervisor to cover their mistake.
Reviewed July 14, 2009
I have purchased 2 vehicles through NMAC. The first time, I did not have a problem. But the second time, it has been nothing but a headache. I was paying my payment on time with my checking account and everything was good, but when I changed to Bank of America and wanted to use my debit card to pay my bill, that was when the trouble began. I paid two months with my debit card and when I received my monthly payment, the balance did not show my payments and I had late fees. I quickly called NMAC and they said they were going to look into it. After two weeks, I called again and they told me they don't accept Bank of America as a form of payment. I don't see why they could not share this with me after the first attempt. They said they were going to fix the negative remarks on my account and never have. NMAC is a very frustrating company to deal with. None of the customer service representatives speak English either.
Reviewed June 21, 2009
On May 8, 2009, the 2006 Nissan Altima I was driving was in a crash. I was traveling approximately 30 mph when I hit the other car. The front of my car is where the impact happened. My seat belt did not work nor did my airbag deploy. I had over $ 7770.00 in damages to the car. As a result, I received a concussion, face, chest and abdominal bruising, knee and shoulder, and other injuries. I also received an injury to my lower left leg. I learned after the fact that the part of my left leg that was injured was reported in the Insurance Institute crash testing on the same type of Altima as a possible problem.
The crash dummy showed injury to the same place from the brake pedal coming back too far. I also learned that the sub-frame had been recalled on my car. I reported the airbag and seatbelt failure to the NHTS and encourage others to do the same. Sadly, it takes the injury of many and often the loss of life before class actions can occur. I reported it to Nissan Customer Service, which was a waste of time and further angered me. I was appalled at the arrogance and condescending attitude they gave. It's my opinion that they only care about making profits at all cost and appear to have no conscience regarding injuries. I would discourage anyone I know from buying a Nissan.
Reviewed June 19, 2009
This should be listed under scams, as I feel that is what happened. My SUV was really stolen from me and there is very little I can do at this point except advertise the circumstances that created this egregious act by Nissan Corp. My husband is a real estate salesman, and with the down of the housing market, we were two months behind with our payment. My husband calls the Nissan Automotive Acceptance Corp. who amended my original contract placing the two missed payments at the end of the contract, extending it to 10/13/2011. I made timely payments on my car loan until they repossess the SUV a full (1) year later, telling me that all my payments went to paying for the late charges and interest on the late charges. They gave no mention of the amended contract or that the two late payments were placed at the end of the contract. I have all the docs for this and copies of my payments.
I would like to add that this was my 3rd Nissan and because of my good record with Nissan I was in the higher preferred loan. There has been no response from Nissan Motor Acceptance regarding my claim or docs, nor have they given me a breakdown of the amount they are charging for late fees or interest, now they have sent me a bill for $8,000, a request to call them to keep the lines of communication open but they seem unwilling to put anything in writing leaving a paper trail.
In Texas, "if your creditor has agreed to accept your late payment or to change your payment date, the terms of your original contract may no longer apply, such a change in your credit contract may be made orally, in writing, or sometimes by the creditor's repeated acceptance of late payments without complaint. " There are other consumer laws that apply.
How have I been hurt? That is a good question, I am a 72 yr old grandmother, with congestive heart failure, COPD, and have been violated by Nissan, the stress of this violation, the unwarranted lies from Nissan is one that has physical ramification.
Reviewed June 15, 2009
My father passed away and I called to report this to Nissan as he had a leased car. They said they could transfer the lease to my mom's name and they would send the paperwork but they need a copy of the death certificate which was faxed to them on May 22, 2009.
They mentioned it would take a few weeks to receive the paperwork. Three weeks later, my husband called and got into a bit of a conversational battle. I called back and they couldn't tell me anything due to privacy issues. That's fine but they couldn't tell me if they received the fax of the death certificate. They only mentioned that they will call me or contact me when they processed the paperwork and that the process takes time and hung up on me.
I clearly mentioned that maybe I'm not explaining my question accurately. My question was simply that since I don't know whether they received the fax, that they may not call me. Even though the info was reported to them, they haven't called either. Currently, my mom and I are driving a car that isn't leased by any of us and I can't get a customer service representative to spend a few minutes to help clarify my question.
Reviewed June 11, 2009
I bought a new Nissan Versa sedan in 2008 from Cox Nissan. The windshield cracked on the driver's side at 7895 miles. I began reading on the forums, Edmunds, etc., that many Versa windshields are cracking on the driver's side around 8000 miles. I contacted Nissan and told them about it. They told me that since Cox Nissan is gone, to bring the car to any local Nissan dealer.
I called Central Avenue Nissan and told them about the cracked windshield. They gave me an appointment for June 11, today. I brought the car there. Not only did they not have any appointment for me in their computer, they said they are not responsible for the windshield cracking. They said they will fix it, but it will cost me $655 plus tax. If you read the forums, one Versa owner is on his fourth windshield. I am paying off this Versa in monthly installments and cannot afford to pay for what is clearly a manufacturing defect in Nissan's Versa cars. Please help me go after Nissan.
Reviewed June 6, 2009
My car was repossessed on or about May 21, so I tried to contact the company to let them know that I had wanted the car back. I was never informed that I had a 10 day grace period to pay the amount due. When I tried to contact the company again, they then informed me that I only had 2 days left to pay. I'm trying to save the money so that I can retrieve the car back. I was out of work for some time of the months prior to the company taking the car. I showed promise in payment leading up to date. I spoke with a rep about the situation and made a payment plan with them. I made 2 ($500.00) payments and I would like to keep the car and making the payments. If possible, I would like to be set up with another payment plan so that this situation can be rectified as soon as possible.
Reviewed June 4, 2009
Google search shows a posting for Nissan Motor Acceptance Corporation in Torrance, CA, with the phone number for Nissin International Transport. I tried contacting Google but, because the account was set up by Nissan, I was not able to have the posting corrected. For the last two weeks, I have called various numbers to try to contact Nissan Motor Acceptance to try to find someone to help. I invariably end up on the phone with a representative who speaks in heavily accented English and passes me to another department where I wait on hold until I have to give up or I just get cut off. I have also tried to contact Nissan by e-mail but the e-mailed response was that I had to call one of the numbers that I had already tried.
Nissin gets a dozen or so calls a day that were intended for Nissan. People calling for Nissan generally become angry that they have not reached the company that they intended and do not stop to think that it is not Nissin's fault that Nissan's posting is incorrect. This has proven to be disruptive and upsetting and we would like it to stop.
Reviewed June 4, 2009
I had a 39-month lease and transferred the lease to a second party six months before the lease was due. The lease fulfillment was up in April '09. The people who I transferred the lease to decided to extended the lease beyond the 39-month period. I did not have any say or authorization in the extension. My legal obligation of the contract is fulfilled.
As a result of the second party extending the lease, my credit report is still showing an open account. My name should be completely removed from the lease since I fulfilled my signed contract of the 39-month lease. The fact that the second party decided to extend the lease is beyond my control or authorization. This issue should not be showing up on my credit report as an obligation. Fortunately, the second party is paying on time and there are no late issues.
Reviewed May 30, 2009
Reviewed May 20, 2009
Reviewed May 20, 2009
Reviewed May 17, 2009
Reviewed May 16, 2009
Reviewed May 13, 2009
Reviewed May 9, 2009
Reviewed May 9, 2009
Reviewed May 8, 2009
Reviewed May 8, 2009
Reviewed May 2, 2009
Reviewed April 21, 2009
I currently drive a '08 Nissan Rogue (which is 9 months old). 3 weeks ago, it would not start. The next day, Wednesday 4/8, I had it towed to Hamilton Nissan in Hagerstown, MD at 10:30 a.m. I called around 3 p.m. and they had not looked at it and asked me the same questions they did when I called saying that I was to bring it in. The next morning I called again (around 10 am). They told me a rock hit my radiator causing a leak. The coolant then leaked onto/into my engine for about a 2-week period shorting it out. The service manager, **, said I need a whole new engine and radiator and that it was around $10,000.00. Then she stated that it was not covered under warranty and I should turn it over to my insurance company.
I then began to ask questions about why my check engine light never came on or why my temp. gauge never moved showing that my engine overheated. She stated she didn't know and transferred me to her manager. He told me the same story and still could not answer my questions. The next day Thursday 4/9, I called Nissan USA to file a complaint. I feel that a new car should have triggered some kind of warning light if this had happened. On Tuesday 4/14, a rep. from Nissan USA called me back by the name of Jamie. She told me that the damage was my fault and that they were looking into doing a goodwill repair of the engine. However, I had to pay for the labor and for the radiator (costing about $2200). I told her that I was not satisfied by this, because no one could tell me why any warning lights never came on. She told me I should be happy with this and that they didn't even need to do this. Also, it wasn't final and she would call me back tomorrow.
In the mean time I contacted a friend who has a good relationship with Nissan Dealer in Fairfax, VA (about 1 hour away). I called the service Manager there (**). ** told me that I should bring my car to him. He also stated that he was 95% sure he could get this covered under warranty. He also assured me that any deal I made with Nissan USA could also be honored at his dealership and I would not have to go back to Hamilton. I then called Hamilton and talked to a manager named **. I told ** I was coming to get my car that evening. He talked to the Service Manager, **, stating I was coming to get my car. She told him it could not be driven and my key was locked up. I told him I knew it could not be driven and that I was going to get my spare key and have it taken by trail. He said ok.
The next day ** contacted me 4/15 and told me a rock hit. That he was going to try and get the engine and the labor for the engine covered and I would pay for the radiator and that labor (about $300). I said ok that I would agree to that. The next day he called back again and said Nissan USA has awarded the work to Hamilton (That they would pay for the engine and I would pay for the labor and the radiator $2200). He said I had three options: (1) I could turn it in to my insurance company; (2) take the deal and have the car taken back to Hamilton; or (3) I could start the process all over with this company. I told him that I did not want to go back to Hamilton because they would not even work with me until I called Nissan USA and that I was not happy with this deal, that I believed that the deal I talked to him about was fair (I pay for the radiator and the labor and Nissan pay for the engine and that labor) since I never got any warning lights. I asked again why I did not get those lights. He stated he would try a test for the codes and call me back.
The next day Friday, 4/17, ** called back and said he could not read the codes and Hamilton may have erased them. I asked why they would do that and he said he didn’t know. I told him I wanted to go with his dealership and to start that process. Now mind you, I have not had a car in over 2 weeks at this point. On Monday 4/20, he called me and said again that I needed to take the car back to Hamilton. I stated that I thought we went over this on Friday. I did not want to take it to Hamilton and I still did not understand why I did not get any warning lights. He told me that he couldn’t answer that and he would talk to his manager and get back to me. In the mean time my friend (Mike **), who referred me to **, called him on my behalf. Mike questioned ** on why he said he could do the work down there and now says it has to come back to Hamilton, also why it had been down there almost a week with nothing being done about it. ** did not have an answer back. Mike then asked why I didn’t get any warning lights. Again ** said he didn’t know.
This is where I am at in the process. I have not had a car in almost 3 weeks, still have no resolution and feel as though on a 9-month old car, I should have had some kind of warning light. Can you please help me?
Reviewed April 17, 2009
Reviewed April 1, 2009
The catalytic converter is defective, pieces break off and got inside the engine and ruined the engine. I had to replace engine and the catalytic converter at a cost of $4000.
Reviewed March 24, 2009
Reviewed March 18, 2009
Reviewed March 13, 2009
Reviewed March 5, 2009
Reviewed March 4, 2009
Reviewed March 4, 2009
Reviewed March 4, 2009
Reviewed March 4, 2009
Reviewed March 2, 2009
Reviewed Feb. 23, 2009
I was contacted two weeks prior the return of my second consecutive lease from Nissan. The lease manager at the Boulder Nissan and I had a discussion about turning in my Pathfinder in the two weeks. My questions were: 1.) Do I need to make an appointment to have it looked at, and they responded, “No, just turn it in.” I did so a day early and under the mileage. I was later charged a $131 late fee for not ordering an inspector; 2.) I discussed the minimal damages with the lease manager, a cracked bumper which was estimated around $400 and a nick in the windshield that was repaired. We were told that we would not get charged if the inspector punched the window and it did not crack. We were charged anyway for the entire windshield after we had repaired it per their recommendation; 3.) When we called to replace a lost key fob, we were told it would be about $150 then were charged $230 on the inspection report.
In all, they wanted over $1,500 in damages and when I called Nissan customer service lease dept, they basically said, "Pay or we will send you to collections." Then they had the nerve to ask me if I was going to lease another vehicle. NOT a way to secure a loyal customer base. The Boulder Nissan dealership where I turned in the vehicle exclaimed they had asked the inspector to leave because they felt the charges were excessive. I am not sure if this is true considering Nissan corporate had told me that we were supposed to be present at the inspection. Again, not what we were told by the dealership 2 weeks prior. If we cannot trust the word of Nissan for proper lease return directions, then what are we, as consumers, supposed to do? Nissan corporate said, "We are not liable because the back of your lease states you need to contact an inspector." Well, I asked Nissan that exact question and I was told otherwise. Now they expect me to pay for their disorganized, corrupt lease management.
Reviewed Feb. 20, 2009
My family and I have been a loyal customer with Nissan for at least 12 years. I have 2 cars now with Nissan. In January, I went to lease a 2009 Altima and before I signed any papers, I said to them, "I am returning my Sentra and I do not want to pay anything on this car." I told them that I have leased with Nissan for 12 years and not once when I leased did I have to pay anything. Robert said, "There shouldn't be a problem." The result was me being charged $2,200. I called up Nissan Motor Acceptance Corporation and they said, "It was in your contract." I told them what Robert said but they did not want to hear about it. They even charged me for a cracked windshield which I never had. I was appalled at the way they treated me. Robert did leave me a message and said, "Send the bill and I will see what I can do." He did nothing extra other than $650 from Nissan when releasing. This left me with a bad taste in my mouth. My family and I will never ever lease again with Nissan.
Reviewed Feb. 19, 2009
Where to begin?! I am extremely frustrated with my lease on my 2005 Pathfinder from Nissan. Every day for the past year, I have been receiving phone calls (from India) regarding missed payments on my car. This is FALSE! Every month I have made sure my car has been paid for, and it clears EVERY month in my bank account. Not only do they charge a hefty late fee, which somehow the number keeps getting higher each time I speak to them, they also have tacked on a city tax for my car lease.
They said they assumed since my mailing address was in a city, the car must be there. FALSE again! I had no idea I was being charged almost $50 more per month on my lease due to my car being in a city. If they took the time to realize where my car is insured, they would realize it is not in a city, but sitting in a driveway in a suburb in a completely different state than where the city is located. I cannot get anything substantial from the people I speak with at Nissan. It seems to go around in circles and more missed payments occur.
The first time we spoke, I missed one payment. The second time we spoke, I missed 2 payments. Over December of 2008, I had missed 3 payments and just today, now the guy is saying I have had 2 missed payments not 3, and if I don't pay by TOMORROW, my credit will be affected and my car can be repossessed! This seems like a real scam to me. All my bank statements have shown that I have paid and the payments have CLEARED my account, so where is the money going every month then if not to Nissan?! I really don't know what to do at this point.
My lease is up in May and I truly want this over and done with. I know I have paid every month since my lease started in November of 2006. Nissan is completely at fault and someone at the corporation needs to take responsibility for this unacceptable nonsense and stress they are causing myself and other Nissan customers! I will never send anyone to a Nissan dealership due to this aggravating mess!!
Reviewed Feb. 10, 2009
I own a 2003 Nissan Xterra. Airbags did not deploy when being hit head on by a tree due to loss of control on black ice going 30mph.
Reviewed Feb. 5, 2009
We had our payment set up for automatic deduct from our VyStar account. This month, February, there were two payments deducted. One payment is all we wanted taken out and then I was told by one of your representatives that this was set up and I could not get the second back into our account. Hopefully this has been corrected.
Reviewed Jan. 28, 2009
I spoke with Ms. ** on Monday, January 26, 2009 in the loss recovery department regarding a repossession of a vehicle financed through Nissan Acceptance Corporation. This vehicle was repossessed on January 15, 2009. The account number is **. The vehicle is a Nissan Titan V8. My call was placed to inquire the past due amount and the total needed to bring the vehicle current. I was told they could not provide me with that information in writing. I then asked to speak with a supervisor, and was transferred to Diane **. Ms. ** was extremely rude and curt, and advised that a letter of redemption had been mailed to me on January 20, 2009, which would detail all charges and fees.
When the letter never came, I called again today (January 28, 2009) and spoke with Ms. ** again, who again was very rude, and advised me she never told me a letter had been posted to me. My son had lost his job, and I am retired and 65 years old. I've worked my entire life and have no desire to hide from paying my obligations. I worked the majority of my life in the service industry and am very aware of what is courteous and what is totally beyond the boundaries. An enormous amount of people are out of a job through no fault of their own and are constantly searching. Maybe some of those who do have jobs employed should do something else for a living and allow someone else a spot that would be appreciated. Times are very hard, and what I experienced was being kicked while I'm already down. I would hope this be addressed, and I still need the information in writing. I thank you for your time.
I purchased a Nissan Sentra in 1994, and I am still driving it. I had so much confidence in the Nissan brand that I wanted my son to experience it as I had. My experience left me feeling abused and not worth the time to respond with what I need.
Reviewed Jan. 18, 2009
I was traveling at approximately 40 mph when I heard a horrible, metal banging sound in the right front. At that very instant, my 2003 Xterra, with 18K miles on it, veered immediately to the left and struck a cement girder on a bridge. No air bags went off, and I had marginal steering capability. I then ping-ponged to the other side of the road and hit the other cement girder on the other side. Finally, the airbag went off after the second impact and the vehicle came to a stop. Thankfully, no one was driving on the road that morning when it occurred or it would have been fatal.
Reviewed Jan. 10, 2009
My wheel bearing went bad 4 times in a 6-month span. I was originally covered for the first time; they replaced it. I took it to 2 other repair shops and they both said I needed a new hub or it will keep blowing out the bearing. Nissan insisted that it was not the hub. Now, mind you, the tire almost was ready to come off with my 2 -y/o son in the car. I had it towed there for them to tell me there is no problem with it. How the hell do they stay in business? And now, I am out of warranty and have to pay for it myself in which the hub alone is $160.
Reviewed Jan. 9, 2009
I am currently leasing a Nissan and have had lots of problems. I made a payment that they said they never received. They finally did figure out where the payment went. Every time I call, I get a different response. First, it was that the payment went to my first car with Nissan that is already paid for, the 350z. Then it was that they sent the payment back to me and I cashed the check. When I asked to see a copy of the check, they said they would mail to me. I have yet to see a check. I have called so many times I can't even count. They continue to charge me late fees and call me almost every day on this. When I ask to speak to a manager, there is never any available. Besides having two cars with Nissan, I also have helped give them customers. I will not any more.
Reviewed Dec. 10, 2008
Reviewed Dec. 9, 2008
Reviewed Dec. 8, 2008
Reviewed Dec. 6, 2008
Reviewed Dec. 6, 2008
Reviewed Dec. 6, 2008
Reviewed Dec. 5, 2008
Reviewed Dec. 5, 2008
Reviewed Dec. 4, 2008
Reviewed Nov. 26, 2008
Reviewed Nov. 20, 2008
Reviewed Nov. 18, 2008
Reviewed Nov. 5, 2008
Reviewed Nov. 3, 2008
Reviewed Oct. 29, 2008
Reviewed Oct. 20, 2008
I love my Nissan and everyone I have had dealings with up until I had to call customer service. Wherever the calls are sent to is irritating. These people do not speak English very well. They are hard to understand and do not know what they are talking about. I was given a phone number to a party line by one of these people. It's a shame but I WILL NOT BUY another Nissan because of this. I will tell all the Nissan owners I know to STOP purchasing cars because your customer service department is overseas!
Reviewed Oct. 14, 2008
When it was time to return my lease, I called Nissan and set up an appointment to get the vehicle inspected. The vehicle was in great shape, but the inspector said there are scratches that I will have to get fixed and gave me an estimate. I told him that I will not pay and will get them fixed myself, because the scratches were so small that any local body shop would do it for less than a fourth of the estimate he gave me. So he said ok and left and gave me a copy of the inspection report. I fixed the car and then faxed the inspection report the guy had given me with all things marked fixed.
After about 10 days, I returned the car to the dealer and he had the old inspection report. I showed him that I got everything fixed and he said everything is perfect and I signed off on the return. A few weeks later, I get a bill from Nissan with the same amount as on the estimate. I called them and said I had it fixed and returned it to the dealer. On that, they just said that the repairs were not according to Nissan standards. I asked why the dealer did not mention anything and they said we reserve the right to accept or reject the repairs even in your absence once you have returned the car.
They could say anything they want. I fixed it, spend money on it and everything was fine, but I still got the bill and the best thing was on the bill. The second page said if I leased or purchased another Nissan they will waive this off. This is a clear scam to force people into buying another car from them. It cost me money to fix the car and now they are still charging me the same money, even though they accepted it at that time and the car was absolutely fine.
Reviewed Oct. 12, 2008
I set up with Nissan to have my payment taken out of my checking account every month. I somehow forgot that it comes out automatically and called in a payment thinking I was a day late. The couple days later, I realized what I did and had my husband call and cancel the payment. They told him they could not refund my checking account and would have to send in reimbursement check in the mail. I did not understand this so I also called. They told me the same thing. I argued that they take the payments from my checking account electronically each month so why can't they just reimburse it? I also told them that my checking account was now overdrawn and any other checks that go through will bounce and force an overdraft on the account. They did not offer any solution except a check in 5-10 business days.
I spoke to a supervisor and he told me the same thing (just in better English). So we traded the car in a couple weeks later and I called to see if the payment the dealership sent in paid off the whole account or if we had to send back in the payment we were getting in the mail. They lady at NMAC told me that she is unable to disclose the amount of the check posted to OUR account and we will have to call back the next day once it has posted. Then she refused to let me speak to a supervisor, just arguing with me that they would tell me the same thing. So we finally got a letter in the mail on Oct 11th (a Saturday) stating we still owed the amount we received and it was due on by the 13th. We only received the check 3 days before that. The whole process was a mess and I will never finance with them again.
Reviewed Oct. 1, 2008
SIMPLE. I had a leased and returned it in less then a week. They threaten me with all sorts of things after I said no to the part where they wanted me to give them 1000 dollars to take the car back. They sent a report to the Credit Bureaus as if the car was taken by force from me and it wasn't like that. I voluntarily took it back! Debt of 11 thousand dollars, bad credit. After all the harassment, threatening, I feel like I have nothing left because of what they did. I've had had a lot of stress since.
Reviewed Sept. 11, 2008
My daughter was involved in a collision while driving my 2008 Murano. She was hit broadside on the drivers side by a Ford F150 pick up truck. The side and curtain airbags deployed directly next to her left ear.
She has consequently lost her hearing in her left ear and suffers from a constant high pitched ringing in her ear as well. She is only 20 years old. When I contacted Nissan Consumer affairs an incident report was taken over the phone (they refused to send me a copy claiming it is for internal purposes only). The airbag coordinator states that this is the first incident ever reported to Nissan regarding hearing loss after an airbag deployment.
She offered no help, no referral to someone else who could help me, but did tell me that she knows what it's like to be at the ENT because she just had her 14 month old daughter there for an ear infection. Are you kidding me? I don't think we are comparing apple to apples here. I am outraged. We have owned 5 Nissan products in past years but will never do business with them again. I hope other people will post if they have had issues with hearing loss after an airbag deployment.
Reviewed Sept. 8, 2008
I inadvertently overpaid my account by $926.00 (selected mortgage company instead of NMAC in online banking)in August 08 and have requested a refund of the balance and have been given the run around for a month now trying to get my money back. On my fifth call I was told I would receive my money within a week. 10 days later still not having received a check I just called to find out they have applied my refund to this months payment which is not yet due. They still owe me money after this month's payment is applied and I don'think I will that back either.
Reviewed Aug. 11, 2008
Everytime I have ever spoken to a rep at this company, they have very limited English and very thick accents. They have been very rude and nothing gets done. They never even sent me my first bill, and then they tried to charge me a late fee! They don't send out payment books, like every other company known to man! They reported to a credit agency that I had neglected to pay by bill on time (for the month after the one that I never received an invoice!), and I found this when I was applying for a loan. They kept telling me that I had negative transactions on my credit report. The multiple inquiries on my credit report brought my credit down quite a bit. I fought it and finally got the loan at a higher interest rate.
Now my husband and I are buying a home, and they told us that we needed to pay off our auto loan in order to be approved for the mortgage loan. We called, and they told us that if they recieved the certified funds by 10 AM that it would be processed that day (Friday, August 8,08). I overnighted it and had them sign for it. They signed for it at 8:49 AM. Now, at COB on Monday, August 11, 08, they still have not processed the check. It is certified! The funds have already been taken out of my bank account! We were told on Monday that it had to be paid off. We had to wait for a wire transfer from my mutual fund, which didn't get in until Thursday.
Now, we are suspossed to close on the 14, which if Nissan continues to drag their feet, it won't happen. We have been extending and extending for one reason or another, and if we lose this house because Nissan cannot do their jobs, then they will have a large lawsuit on their hands that I will not allow to be swept under the rug! I WILL NEVER GET A LOAN THOUGH THIS COMPANY AGAIN, AND HIGHLY DISCOURAGE ANYONE FROM THIS. THEY ARE VERY DIFFICULT TO DEAL WITH AND DO NOT DO AS THEY SAY THEY WILL!
My credit score was destroyed, making me get a loan with a higher interest rate, and now we may not close when we are supposed to, and may lose the loan on our house waiting for the letter stating that we have paid for our truck. We are currently living in an RV park w/ 3 kids in a 23 ft. travel trailer, since we were supposed to be closed out on the house before we even moved!
Reviewed July 15, 2008
i spoke diana rawat on 07-15 and she advsd me that she would have to send a request to have the title released, sarcastically reminding me that over 4 years ago i filed a bankruptcy (which has absolutely nothing to with a loan paid in full - however nissan like to try to make customers feel bad regarding this, asking no questions as to the reason for the bankruptcy, this loan was not even associated with the bankruptcy at all)at this point i still have no title.
Reviewed July 14, 2008
a few months back nissian called and said that we were behind on our payments, we weren't i ask for a payment history and didn't get anything from them, they called again i told them i disputed their claims and was asked to fax them my proof i sent them my bank statements showing them the payments thay said was behind, i didnt' hear from them for several days but a tow truck shows up to get our car, i called them and was told to prove to them i had made my payments, i faxed the bank statements again and was told to call on monday, my wife called and she and billmatrix told them that the payments were made but the car was already gone,
i called again and was told that yes the payments were made but a routing number was wrong, i ask if the account number was right and it was i ask if the name was right and it was too, but the mony was being put into a wrong account, but if i wanted the car back i would have to send them 800 dollars for the repo fees and that 2 months of payments would be put on the end of our payments. i ask why if it wasn't my mastake why did i have to pay for it and was told that it was my responability to be sure that they got our payments,
i send the bank statements in plenty of time to have prevented this but they choose to ignore them until after the car was picked up, i was lied too and their customer service is rude and and in no way interseted in helping, i dont have 800 dollars so i guess it is ok for nissian to auction my car and then bill me for the diffrence and i now find out that there is a class action suit against nissian in calif for pulling this scam i hope that there is something that could be done to a company for this kind of a fraud, i had to take all the money i could scrap togeather and get my wife a car to drive to work, credit history is shot
Reviewed July 10, 2008
I purchased a 2006 Nissan Titan SE and financed through Nissan Motor Acceptance Corp (NMAC). At the time of purchase I worked for a company that delivers new Nissans in the southeast. Essentially I worked for Nissan and received employee pricing, or at least I thought so at the time. Nissan suffered a great financial blow after the Altima recall and my work began to slow dramatically. Approximately one year after the purchase I lost my job and to date have not found stable employment. I managed to I remain current and on time with payments for 20 months.
I contacted NMAC and found the customer service representatives to be helpful. I was late 30 days, and then 60 days when Nissan offered to waive the two payments if I agreed to make a full month's payment by a specific date. The two payments were placed at the end of the loan. I explained to Nissan that my situation was not getting any better and my financial outlook was grim, however I was encouraged to make the payment. I paid late fees, the month's payment and brought the account current. After one month I found myself again unable to make a payment at which point I contacted Nissan and asked for instructions. The representative explained I could voluntarily return the car to any dealer. She went on to explain "the vehicle would be sold and I would be responsible for any deficit."
I questioned as to payment arrangements and the representative indicated "Nissan would be more than happy to work with you." The representative also suggested that I attempt to trade the vehicle in at the selling dealer. I made the attempt to trade in the vehicle but was unsuccessful as the new deal's payment was no better than my current deal; the payment was actually more. In addition the dealer indicated I would need to come up with about $5000 to cover the inequity. At this point I decided that it would be best to return the truck as repossession was looming.
Prior to returning the vehicle I had new tires installed, had the vehicle serviced at a Nissan dealership and paid to have the truck detailed. I returned the truck to the local Nissan dealership in "retail ready" condition with lower than average mileage according to the receiving dealer. The truck was returned in excellent condition.
On July 10, 2008 I received a certified letter from NMAC indicating my 2006 Nissan Titan had been liquidated. According to Nissan, the truck was sold for $10,900 leaving a deficit of $14,496.48. As per the dealer I was upside down approximately $5000 meaning I owed $5000 more on the truck then it was worth as of April 2008. My current account balance with Nissan is $25,076.48. This 2006 Nissan Titan retailed for $32,000.00. My concern here is it appears Nissan has literally given this truck away and passed the deficit on to the customer. I understand clearly that I agreed to pay for this vehicle and defaulted on the contract however I would think Nissan has some duty to recover as much money as reasonably possible.
When I spoke with Nissan and NMAC agents I was led to believe my deficit would be approximately $5000. I anticipated a deficit of $5000 to $6000 and this is what I based my decision on. I find the present deficit of nearly $15,000 outrageous and appalling; and I believe I have been misled. On a more personal note if there is any question as to why the economy is falling apart this is it. The dealer attempted to sell this truck to me above invoice to the tune of $800 per month. I fought and left with a $600 per month payment. Twenty payments - $12,000 later my balance drops by $5000. I fall the wayside and I am hit with a deficit three times that of a reasonable fee. To NMAC this is obviously a $15,000 write-off; to me this is the beginning of bankruptcy as NMAC has demanded full payment.
I suspect that I am alone in this but I think the public should be forewarned and reconsider before purchasing a vehicle from ANY AUTO MAKER on credit. The automakers have no concern as to the overall health of the economy or the people and are only concerned in pushing units out the door and gross. If you can sign your name it makes no difference if you can afford it. The automakers are behaving the same as the mortgage people...we sign and the bank pays the dealer. STOP BUYING ON CREDIT. Is there any hope or help for me? I have no way of coming up with $15,000 nor could I afford to pay this amount off in less then 84 months and this calculation is without interest.
Reviewed July 9, 2008
I had to deal with about 10 different representatives that could barely understand English, trying to handle this claim. No one helped me and when I asked to speak with a supervisor, they said I could not speak with one. They said no supervisors worked in that office. I could not believe how horrible dealing with Nissan could be. I feel sorry for anyone dealing with this company. The family still does not have the money that they needed from this to assist during this tragic event of losing a family member.
Reviewed June 24, 2008
I purchased a 2007 Nissan 350Z Roadster - I have about 16000 miles on the tires and the inside tread is worn completely. Which means the front in is not aligned properly. We have been to several Nissan dealers who are telling me that the car is an aggresive front end handler and we should only get 14 - 20 miles on those tires. And that the car should have got a front end alignment at 14000 miles. No one would buy a car that only got 14000 miles on a set of tires. The tires are Bridgestone and the dealer of Bridgestone says I should get at least 30000 miles - SO who is lying here. We have been round and round with Nissan and no one wants to help us. What happened to customer service???? This is our third Nissan car we have bought - we have been customers for years and all we asked is for the front end to be aligned properly and to prorate the tires - a total of less than $500 for the company. I will never buy another Nissan again and will probably be trading this car in on a Chevrolet.
A
Reviewed June 12, 2008
I recently got a new loan from Nissan Motor Acceptance Corp. for my car. In March 2008, I had an ID theft issue and I had to submit information including police report and other documentation to all the banks and other businesses that I had accounts with. I sent all the necessary information to the NMAC headquarters in Texas but no one took any action. I had cancelled my auto pay as I had to close my accounts. NMAC disregarded all my requests and continued on processing the auto pay and due to this I incurred $25 charge 3 times.
Then NMAC started making collection calls saying that I hadn't paid my monthly car payments. I have copies of 3 checks that NMAC's processing center cashed and for what ever reason it is not showing up in their systems. I faxed over the copies on 4 different occassions and requested the company to contact me to verify that they received my documents. Still no response from these people. I am so sick of them. I don't know what to do. I think now I have delenquent payments on my credit report. No one is taking note of any processes and no one at NMAC is following any legal procedures. I don't know what to do
Reviewed June 6, 2008
I own a 2006 Nissian 350 Z.....what type of actions can (I) we take regarding this company that is selling cars that have major issues reagrding their cluth & fly wheel systems. I have decided to get out the word to anyone that will listen regarding the defective cluth systems that the Nissian Corporation is fully awhere of but have decided to do nothing about...I can assure you that I will never purchase anything associated with the name Nissian.
Reviewed June 4, 2008
I'm gratefully wrapping up a 5 year lease thru NMAC, during which I spent endless hours on the phone correcting improper sales and property taxes. My husband travels for work, so during the 5 years we moved to differing states 4 times. Every time we did, they began charging us varying taxes that were paid up front when we originally got the lease. After each move, it took repeated lengthy phone calls averaging 40+ mins to dispute the charges and have them removed. Most recently (Nov. '07) however, despite calling 3 times prior, the charges failed to be removed and they reported to the credit bureau that my account was more than 30 days past due, although I had been making timely payments to the lease amount, just not the tax I shouldn't have been charged in the first place.
Upon finding this out I had to make several more time consuming calls to dispute it, and was assured that the appropriate steps would be taken to remove this from my credit report. I received a letter that was supposed to be helpful to my creditor (although none of them accepted it because the credit report & score are ultimate determinants) stating that it was their error and it was being fixed but that it would take 30 days or more for it be corrected on the actual credit report. Six months later, I find out that it is still on my report and was right back where I started, spending hours to get it rectified. During this time, the supervisor I was working with, Michael ****, had the gawl to infer that I should have followed up sooner and I wouldn't be in this position. I suggested he check his records because I did follow up w/ in weeks of the occurrence and was assured it was in the works.
He also alleged that he would be in touch with me w/i 48 hours to let me know the status of my request but, not to my surprise, failed to do so. When I called 24 hours after he was due to call me, he denied making that commitment and stated that he had other people to assist. While I'm sure that lame excuse is true, I quickly reminded him this should have been taken care of 6 months ago! In a similar conversation years prior another representative of NMAC snidely stated it was difficult for them to properly review my account because I move so much, inferring I should expect this and that it's my own fault. As if that's any excuse for poor accounting!! I'd also like to mention the incredible amount of false information I've received from them, which always results in excessive transferring from one rep to the next, each with absorbenent wait times.
Reviewed May 10, 2008
No letter for pre-repossession nor post repossession was sent to me letting me k now the date of auction. I did not get any documents stating how much the vehicle was sold for. This has caused a lot of damage to my credit report. I have kids & I am being turned down for home loans.
Reviewed May 2, 2008
RE: File #6338430 I recently took my 2005 Nissan 350Z in to the dealer for service; it was still under warranty with less than 36,000 miles. Among other things, I had them check out a humming noise coming from my front tires. After inspection, the service representative informed me of an uneven wearing on the inside of the front tires, which is a recognized and dealt with problem for the 2003 and 2004 350Z's. I was told by this service representative that I would have to contact Nissan in order to have this problem taken care of since my car is a 2005, that Nissan would have to give me an authorization number in order to take care of it. I called Nissan of America Customer Service and spoke with a representative by the name of Meng. She told me Nissan could do nothing because no problems of this nature have been reported for the 2005 350Z's. Needless to say I am livid. This is a manufacturing defect and Nissan should be liable for the repairs. This issue will be an expensive and on-going problem for the life of the car. The only solution Meng was able to provide was to tell me, I need to replace the tires. This only masks the problem, it does not fix it. Do I have any recourse? I feel it is Nissan's responsibility to take care of manufacturing defects such as this one. They have recognized the problem with the 2003's and 2004's; should they not step up to the plate with the 2005's?
Reviewed April 4, 2008
Contacted Nissan Consumer Affairs to get my vehicle repaired under warranty. I was trying to get my front right brake caliper replaced which IS covered under warranty. At first everything was progressing smoothly with someone handling my claim. Then my claim was handed to the parts manager to see about getting my replacement parts. The parts manager called be about two and a half weeks ago and said she would call me back. Well it has been two and a half weeks since I have heard from the parts manager or anyone at Nissan Consumer Affairs. I have repeatedly made attempts to get someone to call me and I am told they will and nobody ever does. I requested that I speak with the escalation team and the first time I requested this they didn't even process my request. It wasn't until the second time I requested to speak with the escalation team that they actually put in my request. I have contacted Nissan Consumer Affairs for the past three days trying to get the parts manager and the escalation team to contact me. Every time I am told that they will contact me and they never do. It has been a month and a half since I originally started this claim at the time of righting this complaint.
Reviewed Oct. 12, 2007
Purchased 2007 altima hybrid which on the brochure states; come standard with power driver seats. This is supported by the 2007 hybrid owner's manual and the quick reference guide. Popular web sites such as the edmunds.com and the nissan's own website states that the altima hybrid come standard with power driver seats. (nissan however recently removed the 2007 specs and posted only the 2008 specs of which does not come with standard driver power seats)
Reviewed Oct. 1, 2007
Bought 2004 Nissan 350Z convertible roadster.Yea! Love car take very good care of car. All service done at local nissan dealer.On 8/13/07 took car in for top tearing at back of rear window and having holes in it. Top is just rotten. This has happened after only 3yrs.& 3mns. old w/only 22,600 miles on it. I think nissan used cheap material and an inferior product for the top. This on a car costing nearly $40,000 . Spoke to Nissan Consumer Affairs several times asking for assistance with this problem. There answer was that it was due to weather and normal wear.They offer no financial assistance or any kind of help. Car when not in use has been under custom car cover too. Local dealer also thought Nissan would offer to replace top since it is still so new. Have friend who has 5yr. old volkswagon convertible never been in garage or had cover on it lives right here in Fl.and her top is just fine and it,s 5yrs. old.
Reviewed Feb. 5, 2007
I have a 2005 Nissan 350Z with about 17k miles and I bought the car with about 2500 miles on it. I took my car in for service because the gears were slipping with the manual transmission. I have taken the car to this dealer for every service since I have owned the car. The service dept stated that the clutch and the fly wheel needed to be replaced but they would not cover it under the warranty because of custmer abuse. I have by no means abused my car. I barely get to drive the car. I drive my car about 3-4 times monthly for very short drives. To the market and back and maybe to a mall. I have not raced the car nor do I drive the car hard during my short errands 3-4 times monthly. I am very upset that they are not going to cover this repair because I really have taken very good care of every car I have owned even the cars that have been used for work were I have put high mileage on 200k +miles on twice and 120k+ twice as well. I have a car that I drive for work with high mileage and this car that I drive every so often. If I drove the car as hard as they say I would admit to it like I have with the above mentioned cars. What are my rights and options?
Reviewed May 25, 2006
Ten weeks ago, my mother died. Since he is unable to care for himself, my 87 year old father who currently resides in NJ will be moving to San Carlos to live with my wife and I. He currently leases a car from Nissan Motors and as indicated by his physician has multiple co-morbities which hamper his ability to drive. He suffers from diabetes, obstructive lung disease, leg thrombosis and uncontrolled hypertension all of which put him at a risk to himself and others if allowed to continue driving. I have the documentation from his physician.
As he will no longer drive upon moving here, I have been dealing with Nissan (NMAC) to attempt to get an early termination of the car lease without my dad having to pay the early termination fee of $2747.13, money which he does not have (sole source of income is $900.00/month Social Security with no savings) -- the lease is not up until January, 2008.
I was told by a woman at Nissan (Donna) that at times, these early termination fees are waived due to chronic medical conditions. Today, I received a call from her indicating that her superiors denied the request. She also stated that she didn't understand why and went on to tell me about her mother who has Alzheimer's Disease and lives with her and is also unable to drive. Apparently, unless my dad dies, he will be accountable for these fees.
Should he die, they told me they would go after his estate (there is none). Nissan is being quite unreasonable. All he wants to do is return the car, which is in excellent condition, move to California, and not have to pay the early termination fees. At 85 years old, he should never have been allowed to sign a 3 year lese. That, in and of itself, was negligent on the part of Nissan. Is there anything you can do to help him (me) out?
Reviewed May 22, 2006
Because of a growling noise in my front end, and fast uneven wear, I replaced all the tires on my Nissan 350Z on 03/18/05. A few months later, in August of the same year, Nissan sent out a notice to all Z owners that there had been a factory alignment problem that had been causing the exact same symptoms. The notice informed that Nissan would reimburse for replacement tires.
I complied with all of the directives on the checklist for reimbursement but never heard back from Nissan until I inquired about it again just resently. A representative from the company's consumer affairs department is now telling me that because I replaced the tires with a brand that is not the same as the one's replaced, Nissan will not reimburse. This seems very unfair to me considering I replaced my tires long before the notice went out and was unaware of the specifics. My vehicle was still under warranty at the time and I feel I have been made to afford an unfair expense.
Aside from the $574.48 from the actual tire replacement, I'm sure my cell phone records would show that I have spent at least a couple of hours dealing with this issue, not to mention the time I have spend on this website writing this complaint. My average work compensation for time spent is approximately $100 to $150 per hour. In addition to replacement costs, I would like Nissan to pay for my time spent, for a total of $874.00. Mind you, this all could have been avoided if they had dealt with the issue responsibly.
Reviewed May 9, 2006
I was having financial difficulties and my car that I had financed through NMAC got repoed on Sunday. I had just made a payment and still owed them two. The company took my payment never informed me that they would take my car. I called on Monday to set up payment arrangements to get everything caught up since I talked to my parents and they were going to help me. My car would have been paid off in Dec 2007. But the company will not work with me so I can get my car back.
They informed me that I had to pay off the amount of $6400.00 to get my car back. I tried to talk to them and they wouldn't even listen. I need my car for work purposes and don't know what to do. I can't ask my parents for that amount of money and who would help me with a loan since I had gotten so far behind. I guess NMAC want to sell my car since its almost paid off. What kind of people won't listen and give you another chance?
Reviewed May 3, 2006
NMAC had the wrong address on file and was sending my account statements to the wrong address. Due to not receiving my statements payments were missed and my vehicle was repossed. I had an excellent credit history before dealing with NMAC. Mr Mike A, a poor excuse for a customer service representative, was absolutely useless and was down right nasty on the phone.
Upon finding out my car was repossed i immediately called to try and rectify the situation, but was unable to contact Mr A. Upon finally contacting him i was told i had to pay a fee, fax over three references, and proof of insurance coverage on the vehicle in question which i promptly did. Mr A kept telling me he did not receive proof of insurance from my insurance company even though i had confirmation that he had received it. I called him and told him i would like to pick up my vehicle and he told me i could pick it up when he was ready to release it and he threatened me with if you are late with one payment, "I will gladly send them to repo the vehicle and this time you won't get it back."
Reviewed April 12, 2006
When I bought my Nissan Maxima 36 months ago I decided to take their 3 year low-interest loan. It was set up as an automatic draft from my checking account. That is, all but the last payment, which has to be mailed to a different address...but you have to call customer service and wait and wait and wait and wait for an extremely long time to talk to anyone about the different address to send the payment.
Since I was set up on automatic draft every month I never paid a great deal of attention to the statement, knowing it was always paid by drafting my checking account. However, the last statement has in small print where the it normally states that the account will be debited and if you want to pay off in full this is the full amount, etc., etc., it stated your final payment could not be drafted and must call customer services for the address. Not high-lighted nor brought to your attention in in other way, and if you placed your payment with the remittance coupon in the window envelope provided it would go to the wrong address.
I didn't notice that they would not draft my final payment, so I got a past due amount, which I looked like all the other statements, but knowing it should have been paid off, I took a closer look. Needless to say, I'm disappointed and will certainly remember this bad experience the next car I purchase, which won't be a Nissan!!
Probably be noted on my credit history as a late payment which I have never had before
Reviewed April 6, 2006
I owned a 2003 Nissan Altima. Paid off in full Feb. 2005. This past Friday March 31, 2006, I went to purchased a new Mercedez SUV. To my disbelief I was notified by my car dealer that I'd been rejected due to a Charge off reported by Nissan. I then ask What is that? He explained, and asked if I had the title to my Altima, which I had in my hand. He called Nissan, and they told him they couldn't look up the information it was too old, (2005) however this Charge off will be on my credit for the next 7 years.
Tuesday morning I attempted to phone Nissan regarding this situation. I spoke with Jason in the recovery Dept -- he was rude, and uninterested in investigating the situation. He told me he has no history on my account just notes. How is it, that I pay off a car 3 years early, hold the title in my hand, and Nissan doesn't have the time or records to help me clear up this mess. How is it legal?
I was able to purchase my new car, after I supplied them with all my documentation, along with the title to my Altima. However, at a rate of 13.5%. I have every bit of documentation to prove I have been wrongly reported to the Credit Bureau, even a printout from NMAC very own accounting computer system. Why won't anyone at Nissan even look at it? For all the people who don't pay their bills, why would they do this to a customer who has paid in full? The stranger thing, the day I purchased my Mercedes, the Finance Manager told me I was the second customer this had happened to today!
Reviewed March 3, 2006
Due to a recent breakup, my income was cut in half, so I got behind on some of my bills. On Wednesday, March 1st, 2006 I got a call from the company that financed my car, Nissan Motor Acceptance Corp. The guy I spoke with (Willie) said that I was three months behind on my payments, which I already knew (I've been struggling with money since the breakup). He said that he had a repossession order for the car, but that I could prevent it if I made a payment that day by Western Union. I told him I'd make the payment. My payments are $428 a month, so I drove to the bank, and found that I had more cash than I thought. I withdrew the money, drove to the nearest Western Union, and made a payment of $860, which is slightly over 2 monthly payments. They gave me a receipt and a confirmation number.
This morning, I woke up to the doorbell. I looked out the window and saw my car hooked up to a tow truck. I answered the door and told the guy the situation, but he said I would have to call Nissan. He said that when I talked to them, they could call the repo company and release the car. So I removed my personal belongings from the car and got on the phone. I called Nissan, and was told that the guy I spoke to on Wednesday was not in today (of course). I explained the events of Wednesday, explained how I had made two payments, and asked what I needed to do to get the car back. She then informed me that since I didn't call them after I made the payment to let them know, there's nothing they can do.
In order to get the car back, I'd have to pay the full amount. So I'm thinking, this sucks, but I can find $428. As it turns out, when she said full amount, she meant the full amount of the loan, not a full payment. The amount left on the loan is $23,000. Because I didn't make a phone call after making the payments on Wednesday, my car is gone, and I have no way to get it back.
Reviewed Jan. 23, 2006
Back in 2004,I was having a real hard time. I had just lost my job, house, and car had just got wrecked, not to mention my youngest daughter who suffers with bipolar had just tried to commit suicide and she came real close. My car was in the bodyshop and when I went to pick up the vehicle, the owner of the bodyshop said Nissan had repossessed it.
I did not sign a v/s form, nor were there in Louisiana at the time a self help law. The license plate was on the car,also. RS6:966 states before Jan.1,2005 that there must be 3 forms of paperwork and I must sign it. I was not given my personal items that was left inside the vehicle, and I had 10 days to call and request that. I was given the run around. So just because I was financially and mentally destroyed, you had to take your vehicle illegally? I know i had a contract with you, but you can't break the law and get away with it.
Nissan is reporting this to the Bureau and collection co. I'm unable to buy a bubble gum now. I'm a single mother, and since we lost everything due to Katrina I can't get even get a jump start on trying to rebuild our lives.
Reviewed Jan. 6, 2006
On my credit report there is a charge of $292.00 not paid. This was a leased Nissan Quest back in the years of 1997-2000. I have asked on the telephone and faxed a written request to Mr. Mitchell back in December 2005, to supply me with the written documentation of this pending charge, that was either not sent or lost in the mail. I also have requested a copy of what they show that has been paid towards taxes on this vehicle. To no avail, and as of this date nothing has transpired.
There is no personal property tax in our county and if it is a leased vehicle, the company, who is Nissan, should be paying this and not the person who is leasing the vehicle. My tax assessor-collector is prepared to write a letter to this fact. My credit score is in the 700 range and the people who work at Nissan are obviously working just to make a paycheck and not at all trying to help resolve the complaint by the customer, who in turn keeps their product on the road.
Reviewed July 12, 2005
My Nissan 350Z has less than 7,000 miles on it and has a destroyed clutch and flywheel system. Nissan will not cover this under warranty even after telling me they have seen this clutch system go out numerous times on the same model car with less than 2,000 miles.
I have driven four cars with clutches for over 10 years and never had to replace one. This seems to me to be a faulty system. It is not fair that Nissan will not stand behind their product.
Damages: I cannot pay $1500 to repair a car while making $600 per month payments.
Reviewed May 7, 2004
There are several recalls of the Nissa Xterra and I contacted Ms. Morning **, Consumer Affairs Representative for Nissan North America regarding the problems I have with my car. I purchased the car in New York from Kings Nissan, Inc., 1730 Coney Island Avenue, Brooklyn, N.Y. 11230 and shipped it to Panama City, Panama where I now reside. Ms. Morning claims that her supervisor said that I need to bring the car back to the US in order for them to correct the problems and I would like to know if the car explodes due to fuel tank defect, if she will be responsible. Nissan sent the parts and made the correction on another vehicle that is here in Panama and there is no reason why they can't send the parts and have Nissan here in Panama do the job.
Reviewed Feb. 12, 2003
Same as many others, turn in looks good, a month later, after leasing another car, notified that the tires did not meet the inspected standards. Turned in early with no over miles, etc.
Reviewed Feb. 10, 2003
I leased an Altima for my daughter in 2000. I had previously leased 3 other vehicles from Nissan. I always turned them in on time with less mileage than the lease required. I paid my bills on time and never had a late payment. The lease on the Altima was up on Jan 15, 2003. I received a call from Nissan saying they would send an inspector to my house to check the car and place damages. I told them that nowhere in my contract did any mention of inspectors occur outside a regular Nissan dealership. I thought it a fraud.
I turned my car into a dealership in Thomasville, Ga although I had leased the car in Ocala, Fl. I turned it in one week early. The sales manager told me the car was in tip-top shape. I left it in his care. Weeks later I get a bill for $900 for damages to the car. The bumper had been dislodged and I agree with that, but that was a factory default that I had tried to have fixed previously. My daughter who drove the car even sliced her forearm on a factory mistake underneath the seat. A sharp ridge on the driver's side tore a 4 inch gash in her arm. I called Nissan about that and never heard from them again. I do not plan to pay these excessive damages. The car had normal wear and tear like my cars had previously and there was never a complaint before.
Sara should have pursued a claim against Nissan at the time of her daughter's injury. As for the $900, she would be ahead to pay it now, then sue the company in Small Claims Court, seeking a refund plus her costs of pursuing the action.
Reviewed Jan. 30, 2003
After leasing 3 Nissan Maximas, I decided I needed a change. My dealership sells Nissans, Audis, Hondas and several other brands. I turned the car in with several very small "dings." My mileage was 8,000 miles under the limit. The Maxima was in excellent shape and my body shop said about $200 in damage to the car. I told the dealership that I would have it fixed myself. The dealership said they would do it.
Sixty days later, I received an invoice from Nissan for $650 for the car claiming damage to various parts of the auto. I called Nissan and went to the dealer. Nissan did not respond and the dealer said since I did not purchase/lease a new car from them, they said they would not help. Finally, a collection agency representing Nissan called and said that they would NMAC would settle their claim for $350. I said OK, paid the check and never heard from them.
Several weeks ago as I redid my mortgage, I was notified that I had a $300 write off on my credit history. I have never been late with anyone and that was the ONLY black mark on my credit. Subsequently, I tried to write Nissan and the agency they use and got NO response. I am currently contemplating my next course of action which will be legal. Even if I wanted to pay the bill off, Nissan would not even respond so I can do pay it off and then there is not guarantee that they would make the effort to remove the matter from my credit history. All for $300. I will never lease or buy a Nissan/Infinity product again.
Reviewed Oct. 16, 2002
After surrendering my leased Altima to a Nissan/Volkswagen dealer, one month later I received an invoice for $1800.00 Charges included mileage (which I did not exceed), replacement of four tires (because I purchased one new one), dent on bumper and paint wear and tear - how can I have any impact on what the paint job looks like after five years! I do agree that I owe $400 for the dent in the bumper and $150 for (3) cigarette burn holes in fabric - but the other charges are NOT legitimate. At the time of my transaction, when I turned the car into an authorized dealer, I should have had the opportunity to dispute these charges, which by the way were never put in writing when I originated the lease agreement. "Normal wear and tear" has a variety of interpretations.
It is now in collections, damaging my credit rating, which has been impeccable and because of this I am having to increase my down payment for a loan by 5%.
Simply refusing to pay is not the way to settle these disputes. Nicholette should have paid the invoice, then contested it in Small Claims Court. This would not have damaged her credit.
Reviewed Sept. 11, 2002
Nissan asked me to schedule an inspector to come to my home to inspect my Pathfinder at lease end. Inspector came, and noted over $700. worth of damage to vehicle. I had vehicle fixed for significantly less, had vehicle reinspected, damage now $387.00. This occurred AFTER lease agreement ended. Inspecting service, ITS, failed to show up on numerous occasions delaying the process. After second inspection I wanted to hire independent inspector as is my right under Connecticut Law. Nissan said instead of hiring independent inspector they would waive all damage charges. I agreed. By this time it was three months past lease end.
After returning vehicle and getting receipt from dealer stating that vehicle was in perfect condition Nissan sends me a bill for $2400 that included, the three months of lease payments that occurred because they failed to come to inspect vehicle in timely manner, $125 repossession fee, even though I brought vehicle back to dealer. $350 term fee, $201 late fee. tax on term fee, and property tax. This has now gone on my credit report and has kept me from purchasing any other vehicle.
Reviewed Jan. 9, 2002
Do not lease a Nissan unless you desire to further enrich NMAC at the end of your lease. I am adding my name to the growing list of unhappy NMAC customers. This was my first, and last, Nissan lease. Three months before lease expiration, I received a cordial letter from NMAC reminding me about the end of my lease, and encouraging me to visit a local dealer about leasing a new car, which I promptly did. This was in December 2001, a time of economic uncertainty for the auto industry. The dealer and I agreed on a price (a price which I thought was reasonable enough for me to absorb the final 3 payments due on my existing lease), and I was advised by the dealer to schedule an inspection for my existing car.
I then found out that a 3rd party performed the inspection, which could not take place for approximately 3 weeks, despite my offer to bring the vehicle to their location (apparently, there is no "location" to bring it to). In order to complete the transaction that I signed, the dealer said that I could turn the vehicle over to them, and the inspection would be performed there, which I did. This car was mostly driven modestly, was garaged, had 10,000 miles less than the maximum, included an entertainment center not part of the original leased vehicle and was generally in excellent condition. It so happened that on the day I returned the vehicle, a scratch and ding repair company (Dent Wizard) was at the dealership and told the repair cost for the minor scratches or dings on the car.
About a month later I received a certified letter advising me that I owed a $1000 for this 3rd party's (hired by NMAC) bloated repair estimate. After contacting NMAC (Rubin), I was told that I waived ny right to contest the estimate, but that as a returning customer, I was entitled to a $500 credit (a fact of which I was aware, but had to remind NMAC of), leaving a balance of approximately $500. I was told that it was my "impulse" to lease a new car before inspection that was the cause of my problem.
When I suggested to Rubin that I was urged by NMAC to visit the dealer and lease a new car, that I was unfamiliar with vehicle return procedures, that NMAC's reminder letter to me did not give the important details of this procedure, and that a 3 week delay to inspect a vehicle was unrealistic and, as confirmed by the dealer, bad business, all Rubin had to say was that a 3 week delay was about average FOR NMAC. When I suggested to Rubin that someone in upper level management ought to be more concerned about keeping life-long customers than espousing legalisms to extract another $500 out of an old lease, all I was met with was silence. It was then very clear to me that Nissan's priorities lie not with keeping good customers, but with nickel and diming on expiring leases.
The $500 credit is an illusion in the face of this process. If I knew then what I know now, I would never have signed a new lease, and would have paid the money and be rid of them. I know now what I have to look forward to at the end of my current lease, but maybe these histories can stand as a warning to others thinking about leasing with Nissan.
Reviewed July 24, 2001
I turned in my '98 Altima and paid ALL fees due after the finance manager called NMAC to verify the FINAL amount. Since that time I've been nickeled-and-dimed for an additional $+/-1200.00 and a PAID in FULL letter. For the past week (starting 7/18/01) I have been getting harassing phone calls from a collection agency for a tax bill. This was specifically addressed when I turned in the Altima for a 2001 Pathfinder. They have threatened me and my credit report. I NEVER received such a request until they called.
The first call was placed to me on 7/19/01. I told them I didn't know what they were talking about and wanted to know when these supposed letters were sent. The gentleman then, rather curtly told me the FIRST letter was mailed the day before. Yes, July 18, 2001. And he still had the nerve to ask why I hadn't paid it. I received this "intimidating" bill yesterday finally. I am livid.
The original bill was sent out July 9 and you sent me to collections on the 17th!!! That is ridiculous!!!! That is considerably less than 30 days and I have never received the bill from NMAC, only OSI. I want his matter handled.
Reviewed July 14, 2001
I am hurt, My neck is killing me and both my mother and father are on their way to the hospital. We just got into a car accident driving a 1996 Nissam Maxima. We were hit by an oncoming car which missed a stop sign. My car is GONE. BOTH AIR BAGS DID NOT OPEN. BOTH OF THEM. Forget about my airbag (I was driving), but my father hit his head dead onto the front deck. Both my parents are in the hospital now.
Reviewed July 10, 2001
I am the owner of a Nissan Altima Se 2001, the vehicle has 11,157 miles currently on the odometer. On July 4th, 2001 I was driving home Eastbound from Manhattan over the lower lever of the Queensboro Bridge. It had just started raining outside and the mist of the rain was beginning to cover the lower level of the bridge. The speed limit on the bridge is 30 mph.
I was accompanied by my girlfriend Lauren, who was seated in the front right passenger seat of the car. The passenger and myself were both wearing our harness/lap seat beats. Traffic was moving well over the bridge at the time, I was traveling approximately 30 mph. I was approximately 8 to 10 car lengths behind the car in front of me.
At approximately 11:00pm EST the vehicle in front of my vehicle a 1993 Plymouth Voyager suburban had come to a complete stop in traffic on the bridge. Noticing this ahead I began to apply the brakes to slow my vehicle down and bring it to a complete stop. I applied the brakes and to my surprise they instantly locked causing my vehicle to slide on the wet pavement. I had minimal control of my vehicle only when I would release my foot from the brake. When I was braking and sliding I had no control over my vehicle.
I removed my foot from the brake and once again applied my foot to the brake and tried to slow down my vehicle when the brakes once again instantly locked up causing my vehicle to slide on the wet pavement, I tried once again for a third time and got the same results causing my vehicle to slide at approximately 25 to 30 mph into the rear end of the vehicle in front of me. During the attempts to slow my car down I at no time pumped the brakes or had tire traction between the car tires and the road.
My passenger at the time was sleeping and was awakened by the car sliding, she screamed as we were about to hit, I threw my right arm across my passengers chest as a reaction to help prevent her from flying forward. Upon impact both my passenger and myself were thrown forward towards the windshield. My left arm was still holding onto the steering wheel as my right arm was trying to hold my passenger back.
My passenger was thrown forward and struck her head on the windshield/roof of the car causing her to sustain injuries to her head, neck and back. My passenger's legs also went into the dashboard of the car causing severe bruising and pain to her lower extremities. I myself sustained injuries to my left elbow from holding onto the steering wheel as we crashed. At no time during the impact between vehicles did the harness/lap beats or air bags engage to protect my passenger or me the driver. My vehicle sustained a full frontal impact with the vehicle in front of me.
Reviewed May 3, 2001
Here is the letter I wrote to Nissan, but never got an answer to:
March 24, 2001
Mr. William O. BosleyVice President, Customer Service
Nissan Motor Corporation in USA
P.O. Box 191
Gardena, CA 902-0191
To Whom It May Concern:
I have a 1991 Nissan Sentra that I absolutely love. I have almost 70,000 miles on it and it rides like it is brand new. However, to look at it, you would think I was riding in an old jalopy. People all over, neighbors, friends, and colleagues make fun of it all the time. It is red with white blotches all over it.
I am a school secretary, and when I pull up to school with my car, everyone laughs. So recently I decided to have it detailed. I was recommended to someone that has been doing it for years. I left it at her house to have done during the day. She called me at home and said, Fran, I will not waste your money. There is nothing I can do for your car to make it look better. She told me that the paint had in her words broken down, paint contamination and that she believed that Nissan had recalled my car about the paint.
When I called my Nissan dealer which has changed hands at least 4 or 5 times since I bought my car, they knew nothing about it. Because of all the changing of that dealership, I would assume that was why I never heard anything about any recalls.
I was quite upset and was just going to have to buy another car. However, as you might know, in this life we cant make plans. God makes plans for us. I think you need to know a little background to understand my predicament. The past few years have been very hard on us.My husband, age 58, has undergone quadruple heart bypass, carotid artery surgery on both sides, and in June of this year had a heart attack. My mom has had three heart surgeries in the past few years. My son, age 27, was in a car accident in Florida where he lives at around the same time my husband was being helicoptered to Philadelphia Hospital this past June. He suffered injuries, but unfortunately, I was torn and needed to be at my husbands side. And luckily I stayed at his side and did not run down to Florida to be with my son, although it killed me, because a few days later, my husband had congestive heart failure and I had to call 911 and have him ambulanced back to the hospital.
There is much more, but I think you have heard enough of what we have gone through. My husband cannot work again and is on long term disability and cannot deal with stress in his life, which we all know is impossibility. But we are trying. So as you might guess, we cannot buy a new car right now. And really, there is no reason to. My Sentra takes me back and forth to work and rides beautifully. But I really am very embarrassed.
So I took the ladies advice and looked up about recalls and sure enough there was something about the 1991 Nissan Sentra having paint trouble. Is there someone at Nissan with a heart, that can allow my dealer to just repaint my car. As I said, my husband is on long term disability and cant do it for me and things are pretty hard now that he is not working, so any help you can give me would be so greatly appreciated. I have enclosed some pages I found on the Internet about my car, but thankfully I have never had one days trouble or had to bring it in other than the usual things to keep it in good condition. Again, any help would be greatly appreciated.
Sincerely,
Fran
We doubt there was an actual recall to fix a paint problem though there may have been a "secret warranty" program to fix some models. We think Fran should just drive the car and forget about it. It can't possibly look any worse than our 1989 Peugeot. Far from being embarrassed we always try to park next to the newest, shiniest most expensive car we can find.
Reviewed April 3, 2001
Approximately 35-40 days before having to turn in our leased Sentra, we went shopping for a new Nissan at a local dealership. We found a car we liked and decided to lease this new vehicle. Upon signing the papers for the new vehicle we were told by the dealership sales manager that we could leave our Sentra at the lot to get an estimate for wear-and-tear charges that would be due upon lease termination.
The estimate came to approximately $1500.00. Knowing we kept the car immaculate, were about 12,000 under the allowable mileage, and had kept up the routine maintenance, we knew this amount was way to high for normal wear-and-tear. Nissan informed us that we were obligated to pay this amount and our only other option was to take it to someplace else and repair the damages before lease termination.
I had a list of the so called "damages" faxed to me and found that it had front-end structural damage listed at a cost of $750. Never being in an accident or curb-hopping I asked how this damage could have occurred. I was informed that it was done when the car was put on a lift to have the oil changed. They said it happens to most of the Sentra's and were surprised we were never informed of this problem.
I still could not understand how an oil change would cause that much damage so I had my wife, who is an auto insurance claims adjuster, research their proposed damage. We found this damage was not possible to attain by the car being put on lifts. Becoming increasingly angry, I decided to pick up my car and take it to a mechanic where I could get the repairs done for a fraction of the cost that Nissan suggested.
When I arrived at the dealership I noticed my car was no longer there. My lease still had 15 days on it, they did not give me the opportunity to fix the "damages" elsewhere, and they shipped my car off to auction. I went off. As I was describing the car to one of the salespeople to find its whereabouts he replied, "Oh yeah, that's the one the truck hit."
Turns out one of their transport trucks had hit our Sentra in the parking lot causing the front end damage. There was even a signed form by the driver stating he had hit our vehicle. So our problems are finally over? Not even close. Nissan claims once the vehicle has been inspected by their "certified inspector" there's nothing they can do. They insisted I pay the full $1500. I contacted everyone from the dealership up to corporate and was railroaded at every level. Not one person in the organization cared about our problem or even suggested a course of action. The only response we could get is, "Deal with it."
Finally, I gathered up all the evidence, presented it to Nissan, and threatened legal action if they did not act. Four weeks later I get a billing statement in the mail saying they have waived all charges. No explanation. No apology. No one to contact w/ any questions. Just a statement. Then they quietly slip off into the darkness to take advantage of another consumer.
To sum up, Nissan did the following:
- Damaged my car
- Had the inspection done after they caused damage to make the estimate binding and force me to pay for it
- Lied about the cause of damage
- Shipped my car to auction while still under lease in my name
- Did not give me the opportunity to get "damages" repaired elsewhere
- Ignored my inquiries, complaints, and pleas for help at every level
My wife and I are 27 years old and we're already on our fifth lease. At this rate we'll lease approximately 20 more cars in our lifetimes. I guarantee none of them will be Nissan. This company has left a sour taste in our months and I'm appalled by the way they handled our situation. I can't think of another time I've ever been treated like that as a consumer. Nissan, your cars are average and your customer relations is garbage.
Reviewed March 13, 2001
In July of 1999, I tried to return my 97 Nissan Altima to the leasing dealer. I had misunderstood the procedure for inspections and thought that they did them there. When I arrived at the dealer they explained that I need to contact an inspecting agency for an inspection of the vehicle before I could return it. I then contacted the agency (ITS) to schedule an inspection of my vehicle. This was on July 29, 1999 and my lease expired on August 1, 1999.
When I called ITS I explained to them that my lease expired on Sunday and I was told that it wasn't a problem, just get the inspection done and then return the car back to the dealer. My inspection was done on Tuesday afternoon August 3, 1999. Because of my work schedule I could only get back to the dealer (approx 20 miles away) on their late nights which are Monday or Thursday. I let Nissan know that the inspection was done and that I would be returning the car on Thursday evening August 5, 1999. They said all I needed to do was take them a copy of the inspection and the car and they would record the miles and that was it.
Well, when I arrived at the dealer (Dearborn Pontiac-Nissan) in Dearborn, Mich. The Nissan Sales Manager said that he was too busy to take the car back that evening and that I would have to return. The next available day for me to return the car was on Monday evening August 9, 1999. I arrived at the dealer at about 7 p.m. after finding a sitter and arranging for someone to meet me there to drive me home. This time the Manager again said that he was too busy to deal with me. I then became angry and told him that I could not afford to keep coming back out there and that the lease was already 8 days past due and that I needed to return it that evening. I left the inspection report, all my paper work (signed) and the keys on his desk. I then went outside and removed my plate from the vehicle.
As I was sitting in my sister's vehicle, I called Nissan customer service to let then know that the dealer now had the vehicle. Just then the Manager walked out of the building and laid the paperwork and the keys on the hood of the car, turned, looked at me and went back inside. As I already had Nissan on the phone I asked the woman on the other end what to do. She asked to speak with the Sales Manager, so I took my cell phone inside and told the Manager. His response was that he did not have time to speak with her.
I then walked outside and she told me not to leave the vehicle there. She told me to take it home. I asked if Nissan could send someone to pick up the car and they said that they didn't do that and she would contact me the following day to give me the name of another dealer that it could return the car at.
The following day, I worked until 6 p.m. When I arrived home there was a message on the machine that I was to return the car to the SAME dealer at 5 p.m. Well obviously I had already missed that appointment, so I decided to contact NMAC again the following day to make other arrangements.
That night approximately 11:30 p.m. there was a knock on my door. when I answered the door there were three young men there. They told me they were there to pick up the car. I said GREAT! I have been trying to give this thing back for two weeks now. One of the young men remarked that he had never seen anyone that happy about them taking their car before. I explained that the lease was up and that the dealer had been refusing to accept it. I gave them the inspection report, and both sets of keys and then I removed my plate.
The next day I contacted Nissan to thank them for sending someone to pick up the car. I asked them to send me a bill for the last 2 payments that were due (I had lost my job in June 99 and didn't start my new job until mid July 99) and the $88.00 that the inspector said that I owed for a few dings.
I finally received a bill from them in Sept. 1999, and it included a tow bill for them picking up the car. I called NMAC and complained about the $190.00 tow bill but the said that was what they had to pay for someone to pick up the car, so I unwillingly agreed to pay the bill which totalled $787.98 I sent them a check for the full amount on Sept. 26, 1999.
That was my last contact with them. I never received another bill and approx. 4 months later I had to close that account, assuming that the check had cleared by then. (I am not in the habit of balancing my checkbook). Then in January 2001 I received a bill from an attorney's office stating that I owed NMAC $7,870.00. I frantically called the attorney's office regarding this and was told that they would have to request documentation of the debt from NMAC and they would forward it to me. Today is March 13, 2001 and I still do not have those papers.
Reviewed Feb. 21, 2001
I leased a 1998 Nissan Altima GXE from a dealership in Atlanta, GA 38 months ago. The vehicle has received normal driving over the last 38+ months and the lease ends March 20, 2001. All lease payments have been made on time.
About three weeks ago I received a call from NMAC asking what I intended to do with the vehicle and I indicated I would return it as I was unhappy with their dealership personnel and would secure a different vehicle. I was told that I could arrange an appraisal inspection with ITS and/or return the vehicle to the closest Nissan Dealership to where I am currently residing.
Last night I went to Nissan of Union City and was met by a Salesman who asked if he could help me. I said yes I was there to turn in a leased vehicle that was at its lease end, all payments had been made. He asked my wife and I to sit at a table in the dealership and proceeded to ask if we wanted to buy the vehicle, or trade it in on another Nissan. I and my wife said no we just wanted to turn the vehicle in.
Then over came Chris White the Finance Manager. He asked if we had the vehicle pre-inspected and we attempted to explain the conversation we had with NMAC. He kept interrupting us and saying they were refusing to accept the vehicle for return. I asked him to give us a written statement of the refusal and he refused to do that. He later said they would accept the vehicle for return but I would have to sign a written agreement that I waived any and all rights I had, that way if "a tree limb fell on the vehicle after they had accepted it for return, I would still be responsible for all damages."
Needless to say I would not sign the waiver. He refused us talking with any other member of management at the dealership. We then took pictures of the vehicle as it sat in front of the dealership and a couple pictures of the front of the dealership building. Then we drove home totally shocked by this experience,as this Chris had gone on to explain to us that the dealership could sell a vehicle to anyone, for any price, charge any interest rate and could refuse to sell to anyone for no reason at all, and they did not have to honor even their own advertised sales. Why he even mentioned this we do not know.
We returned home and promptly called NMAC, as the dealership also refused to call them when we were there earlier. NMAC verified our earlier conversation with them about the return of the vehicle and got the dealership, a Troy Sales Manager, on a conference call with me. The end result was a lot of apologies, retraction of the statement that I refused the inspection of the vehicle and that Troy would call someone he knew and get the vehicle set for inspection and the next day. I called Troy later that same night and he said he would try for the next day but could arrange it within three days.
Today I called the dealership and spoke to Sam the General Sales Manager as Troy had the day off and had not made an appointment for the inspection. I made Sam aware of the previous nights situation and he said he would call and get the inspection set up. Well he called later today to advise that the inspection would be on March 5th, which I find unacceptable. Tonight I called and talked with a Don Henderson at NMAC and virtually all he would do is attempt to quote me things out of the lease about required inspection and a wait for the inspection of up to 14 days, etc.
I did correct him that the lease does not say an inspection is required, does not say that the inspection could take up to 14 days. I reminded him that all payments were made on time that the vehicle is below the 39,000 miles allowed on the lease, is in good shape, no mechanical defects, that I had the brakes replaced around 18,000 miles and the tires around 26,000 and that there was a couple of door dings, but we both remarked that was ordinary for a 39 months old car driven in and around Atlanta, GA.
But he also stated that the 14-day wait for the inspection was within their guidelines and refused to do anything to assist us. I firmly believe I am being abused in this transaction. Both my wife and I are shocked by the treatment we received by the Finance Manager at the Dealership and his statements, and rudely treated by this Don Henderson from NMAC. We now have the added expense of the round trip to the dealership and back home because of the refusal to accept delivery. And, I now have to carry the vehicle from yesterday to at least March 5th on auto insurance again because of the refusal to take delivery.
Reviewed July 16, 2000
I was driving my '96 Nissan D21 regular-cab truck down county road 503 when the air bag deployed spontaneously without any collision. My left arm was forced through the closed driver-side window, breaking some of the glass out. And the air bag hit me in the face, causing me to lose steering control. The truck then went off the road hard -- right into a big ditch.
I called Nissan to report it and was told it was my fault the air bag went off. Nissan told me that the truck was safe and that there were no service bulletins or recalls on the air bag on that year truck.
But I found out that there was a technical service bulletin for the 1996 Nissan D21 truck and some of the other Nissan cars from 1993-1996. I found it on the NHTSA Web page; the TSB number is 96-082a, issued Sept. '96, "SRS control unit failure diagnosis."
I can not see how Nissan can say this was my fault. I was not driving fast and I did not hit a thing until the air bag went off and I lost control of the truck. I had a witness in the truck with me and a witness behind me that saw the air bag go off.
I got a bad burn to the inside of my left arm from the air bag and lost two teeth. I had a hairline fracture to my left elbow and neck and lower back pain. I have cord compression, has post traumatic stress disorder, major depressive disorder and hypertension and anxiety. I have not been able to work in two years. The passenger suffered more minor injuries from whichi he has recovered.
I got five doctors and 12 prescriptions I take every day and Nissan will not help me. It is wrong for Nissan to do people this way.
Nissan Company Information
- Company Name:
- Nissan
- Website:
- www.nissanusa.com
