Cadillac Reviews

4,885,617reviews on ConsumerAffairs are verified
  • We require contact information to ensure our reviewers are real.
  • Our moderators read all reviews to verify quality and helpfulness.
  • We use intelligent software that helps us maintain the integrity of reviews.

About Cadillac

This profile has not been claimed by the company. See reviews below to learn more or submit your own review.

Cadillac is a division of General Motors that manufactures luxury cars. Read reviews for their models:

Cadillac Reviews

Filter by Rating

  • (75)
  • (51)
  • (32)
  • (46)
  • (217)

Popular Mentions

    How do I know I can trust these reviews about Cadillac?
    • 4,885,617 reviews on ConsumerAffairs are verified.
    • We require contact information to ensure our reviewers are real.
    • We use intelligent software that helps us maintain the integrity of reviews.
    • Our moderators read all reviews to verify quality and helpfulness.
    Recent
    • Recent
    • Oldest
    • Most helpful

    A link has directed you to this review. Its location on this page may change next time you visit.

    How do I know I can trust these reviews about Cadillac?
    • 4,885,617 reviews on ConsumerAffairs are verified.
    • We require contact information to ensure our reviewers are real.
    • We use intelligent software that helps us maintain the integrity of reviews.
    • Our moderators read all reviews to verify quality and helpfulness.
    Page 5 Reviews 440 - 640

    Reviewed Dec. 2, 2009

    CADILLAC OR GM PRODUCT I WILL OWN. They are aware that they have a problem but are not willing to fix it.
    Thanks for your vote!

    Reviewed Nov. 2, 2009

    Purchased a used 2002 Cadillac DeVille in May.
    Since the purchase, all of the windows have had power failure (where the window rolled down but wouldn't roll back up) it happened one at a time.
    Thanks for your vote!

    Reviewed Oct. 20, 2009

    Purchased GM Certified Cadillac from dealership. Within 2 months the vehicle experienced mechanical and electrical issues. Over the next 10 months, the vehicle was serviced 7 times. Each time the vehicle was promised fixed or issue could not be duplicated.
    On the 5th attempt GM replaced torque converted and rear differential. New symptoms arose from the repair (acceleration problems and vibration). Was told all four tires needed to be replaced. Got third party opinion and two sources advised me the Goodyear tires were defective and not from normal wear and tear. Goodyear says the tires are only good for 24k miles but they don't want to publish it. It is a known problem with Cadillac and Goodyear that the tires wear out easily. The dealership denied my request for a buyback or fair value trade-in. The dealerships did not take accountability for their performance and played the blame game. GM Assistance was of no help and sided with the dealership. Lesson learned is never to buy GM product. If you do, buy a new vehicle and not a used certified as you DO NOT have the same rights (e.g. Lemon Law). It only applies to new vehicles even if it's certified by the manufacturer. With any other product, you are allowed to return it to the retailer. However, the position for cars is that you have to take it up with the manufacturer as the dealerships are only retailers. I thought purchasing a high end car would also come with a high end customer service experience. This is truly not the case and it is no wonder the American car industry is going down the toilet. Even though I currently own 3 GM car, my future vehicle purchases will be foreign cars.
    Thanks for your vote!

    Reviewed Oct. 9, 2009

    I own a 1990 cadillac elderado (I know it is old but it is my baby and I take special care of her), anyway I was getting on the freeway and up to 60 mph when I heard a loud noise and pulled over to the side. Two other cars pulled over behind me as they had been hit by the lando (vinyl top) that had come off the car in one large piece and hit their car. Again I know my car is old but there was no sign of the top getting loose and all the trim around the top was still in perfect condition. If I had seen any lifting I would have done something about it. I am unsure if someone should be told of this problem because it can cause an accident worse than what I experienced.
    Thanks for your vote!

    Reviewed Oct. 7, 2009

    General Motors Corporation
    GM Corporate Affairs/Community Relations General Motors Corporation 100 Renaissance Center Detroit, MI 48265 313-667-3800 313-556-5000 To whom this may concern, I was miss-treated by the dealer because I stood up for my rights and questioned their business practices. During the same visit, all but a few quick and high return jobs were declined under warranty and the District Service Manager comes clean about my REAL Cadillac Bumper to Bumper warranty. Back in July/09 I had brought my truck to Myers Cadillac in Ottawa for some simple warranty work and maintenance. I was provided a Cadillac DTS as a loaner from the Budget counter inside the dealership. The following day, the rental died on my way to work. The car got towed to the dealer and they gave us our truck back as it was ready. A few hours later we received a call from my service advisor, Cory Egan, telling me there was water in the gas and that I was responsible for the damages. I had to pay $1600.00 in repairs right away or, for every day that the vehicle is out of service, I would be billed additional rental costs. This was odd as the car was filled the night before at the gas station. I called my insurance company and the adjuster took a look at the car. The adjuster told me there was only $830.00 in damages. Upset that I was being mislead, I posted on a car club forum that I am a member of for advice. Here is the link: http://www.j-body.com/community/showthread.php?t=28261 After dealing with the district manager of Budget via e-mail, budget agreed to pay my insurance deductible. Case was closed. Two months later (September 9th 2009) I brought my truck to Myers Cadillac for a few cosmetic warranty concerns (some were repeats). I advised them that I was heading out of town and would not be back until September 15th 2009. This is the letter I found in my work e-mail dated September 10th 2009: [QUOTE] From: Cory Egan [cegan@myers.ca] Sent: September 10, 2009 1:21 PM To: Eric.Villeneuve Cc: Marc Seguin [mseguin@myers.ca]; bob rintoul [brintoul@myers.ca]; Subject: Internet Blog Good morning Eric, We were contacted by General Motors about some blogs and posts you made on the j-body and Cadillac forums. A GM rep came accross them and contacted the Customer Care Centre and asked them to contact us.Thank you for the positive comments you previously posted about the great service Myers and myself have provided you in the past. But I am saddened and dissapointed that you would now present Myers and myself (by name)in such a negative light concerning the issues with the Budget rental during the summer. You posted in your blog that the only reason you were being charged for the repairs was for Myers' financial gain due to the poor economy. This is not only inacurate but it is slanderous. In one post on j-body.com you even insinuated that Myers was fraudulently performing repairs on the rental in order to hold you responsible for the cost of the repairs Here is your quote-"I'm starting to think something else was up and they are trying to make me pay for repairs..". The rental clearly had a non warrantable breakdown due to contaminated fuel and throughout the entire repair process Myers and myself not only kept you fully informed of what was going on with the repairs but it was Myers and myself that pressured Budget to absorb your insurance deductible. So the only one who truly gained finalcially was yourself. You quoted later in a post that "Calling my insurance company was a knee jerk reaction to the threats from the dealer. I admit that I panicked at the high cost of repairs combined with having to pay the additional rental costs for ever day the car is down.". I fail to see how Myers or more inportantly myself threatened you. You quoted in one post, an e-mail that I had sent to you with the estimate breakdown but forgot to include the part where I suggest you contact your insurance company or credit card provider to see if they can offer assistance. Doesn't sound threatening to me. You also posted the original estimate given to you was $1600.00. The insurance company said it was $830.00 . The dollar amounts don't matter. What matters is the fact you didn't mention that the estimate we gave vs the insurance estimates were different because the insurance company may have been pricing out used or aftermarket parts and the labor they allow is usually less time than the job actually takes.Any body shop can verify this. So no... we were not trying to "take you to the cleaners". You failed to mention in any of your posts that fact that Myers and Budget were hoping to not have that incident tarnish our buisness relationship and even after Budget had paid your deductible the fact that they are still willing to allow you to drive their vehicles. Our service Director even sent an e-mail to Budget pleading your case. Due to privacy issues this e-mail is not attached but is available for you to read if you choose. Myers Cadillac Chevrolet is the number one dealer in customer satisfaction in the country and have been for over a year and a half. We got that way by treating all of our customers with dignity, compassion and respect. Something else you also failed to mention. As far as the current repairs to your Escalade they will be treated the same as any other Cadillac customer but after that it may be best that Myers and yourself part ways as we obviously cannot provide you with the level of service you require. Feel free to post this e-mail in any of your posts and blogs so the public can hear both sides of the story. Cory Egan Service Consultant Myers Cadillac Chevrolet 1200 Baseline Rd Ottawa On K2C-0A6 613-225-1260 [/QUOTE] My reply to this e-mail can be found in a thread here: http://www.j-body.com/community/showthread.php?t=29065 When Myers Cadillac asked me to come and pickup my truck, all but a few warranty complaints were resolved. Even the repeat claims (the ones I had repaired and became faulty once again) were declined by the DMS (Randy) due to “Wear and Tear”. We had a meeting with the Service director at Myers Cadillac (Mark Seguin) and the DSM for Ottawa Ontario, Randy. They would not offer any explanations as to what caused the wear and tear on my warranty claims. (Headlamps have a white film inside, trim becoming unglued from the body, chrome peeling off the wheels, etc). They said that even though my truck is still under its 4 year bumper to bumper and under the 80K Km. that these items were getting old and prone to failing. My argument is: Should Cadillac not at least design its trucks to outlast its manufacturers warranty under normal operating conditions? After much conversation, the DSM (Randy) agreed to have the passenger leather seat replaced as promised previously by Myers Cadillac and pay half the cost of refinishing my chrome wheels. After some research and the help of other automotive enthusiasts, I came across this General Motors bulletin: ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- #07-03-10-015: General Motors New Vehicle Wheel Warranty Coverage - (Nov 6, 2007) Subject: General Motors New Vehicle Wheel Warranty Coverage Models: 1996-2008 GM Passenger Cars and Light Duty Trucks (including Saturn) 2003-2008 HUMMER H2 2006-2008 HUMMER H3 2005-2008 Saab 9-7X The General Motors New Vehicle Wheel Warranty This bulletin has been issued to clarify warrantable conditions on GM OEM wheels. It is our intent that this one document will answer many of the warranty scenarios you are likely to encounter. Unlike other parts of the vehicle, wheels encounter various road hazards, corrosive substances and abuses that may present questions in both the mind of the customer and the dealer. Eligible conditions are warranted for the full term of the New Vehicle Warranty. Currently for Chevrolet (except Corvette), Pontiac and Saturn, this is 3 years / 36,000 miles (60,000 km) and for Buick, Cadillac, HUMMER and Corvette, coverage is for 4 years / 50,000 miles (80,000 km). Information Sources for Wheel Issues GM provides many different styles and finishes for our passenger car and truck wheels. You will find both steel and aluminium wheels with painted, polished or chrome finishes available. While each of these types must meet GM durability standards for road impacts and finish appearance, there are conditions that are not warrantable. Curb Impact / Scrapes Wheels that have been damaged through abuse are not warrantable. Finish scraping and wheel flanges that have been damaged due to curb impact are not warrantable. Bent Wheel Flanges / Cracked Wheels Bent wheels and cracked wheels due to road hazards are not warrantable. In many cases bent and cracked wheels result from driving on low tire air pressure or a flat tire. Low tire pressures dramatically reduce the impact protection the wheel has and lowers the threshold where damage may occur. Finish Damage / Streaking / Pitting / Corrosion There are many different types of finish damage possible, resulting from aggressive cleaning products, road chemicals, poor tire changing practices, or manufacturing processes. Some of these are warrantable while others indicate abuse. See the Finish Damage sections below, which give examples of the different types of specific finish concern issues you may encounter. Warrantable Issues Any defects in the finish, balance, or structure of the wheel resulting from improper manufacture are covered under the New Vehicle Warranty for the full time and mileage limits of that warranty. Typical covered finish issues that you may encounter are: • Flaky or pitted chrome on the visible wheel surface indicating poor adhesion of the plating. • Polished or machined aluminium wheels that exhibit Filiform Corrosion (chalky white lines under the clear coating) this condition is warrantable, unless it is caused by incorrect wheel weight application and use. • Wheel center caps that exhibit similar conditions to warrantable wheel concerns. • Thin or poor paint finish quality on painted wheels. Bubbling / Flaking of the paint. • Paint damage incurred during stick-on wheel weight changes. (See Stick-On Wheel Weight Paint Damage or Paint Flaking/Peeling Backside of Wheel) • Flaking or peeling on backside surface of wheel indicating poor adhesion of the plating (See Stick-On Wheel Weight Paint Damage or Paint Flaking/Peeling Backside of Wheel). I have tried to contact the DSM through Mary Clark at Cadillac customer relations The DSM offered me a multitude of examples as to similar warranty claims that were approved but the vehicles was newer Less then 2 years or 40K Km or it was still the original owner who had it. My warranty booklet clearly states that my warranty is fully transferable and nowhere does it state that the bumper to bumper warranty is divided into a 2 year / 40K km where everything is covered and the last 2 years 40K km where only powertrain is covered. To be sure of this, I contacted several GM dealerships inquiring about a new Cadillac Escalade, Pretending to have an older model out of warranty. I asked about the same issues I am having today and if it would be covered under warranty. They all confirmed it would and all the calls have been recorded. Therefore, either General Motors dealerships are misleading customers or General Motors is not backing up their warranty as they should. In my last conversation with Myers Cadillac’s service director (Marc Seguin) he also confirmed that the wheels on my Escalade were of a pour design and he has seen many returns because of the same issue. Thankfully this was also recorded. Recorded phone conversations can be found on Youtube at: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v9Ta4wiGuy8 I have been a General Motors fan since as far as I can remember. My passion started with an 84 Pontiac Fiero, then an 85 Fiero Gt, I still own my 86 Fiero GT Fastback, my 97 Pontiac Sunfire, my 2000 Sunfire GT, my 1997 GMC Suburban K1500, my 2002 GMC Envoy, my 1998 Pontiac Montana and finally today, my 2006 Cadillac Escalade. Sadly. after the way I have been treated, I will never buy a GM product again. Thank you,
    Thanks for your vote!

    Reviewed Oct. 1, 2009

    After replacing six window regulators. I thought I would call and see if there was a recall or assisstance once I found another window had stop working. I faxed proof of this and they began an "investigation."
    Then I recieved a call from the rep. over my area.We spoke and I was reminded that my car was an older car 2004 Deville.And I pointed out although this is true it should not have anything to do with the longevity of the window regulators. The next day I recieved a call and was informed that "the carwas older with 80,000 miles, also I have a 12 month warranty on the window regulators.
    Thanks for your vote!

    Reviewed Sept. 22, 2009

    I got into a accident in my 2000 dhs on 8/19/09 and my air bag never deployed. in a head on going 40 mph into a tree. I have pictures of this car. Lucky I wasnt seriously hurt.
    Thanks for your vote!

    Reviewed Sept. 21, 2009

    September 21, 2009
    GM Management Dear GM Management, My name is Janie Mack James and I am the owner of one of your vehicles, a 2003 Cadillac CTS. I have contacted representatives from GM about my vehicle, but it appears that my situation has fallen on deaf ear and I feel that I am getting the run around. On August 21, while on vacation, the driver’s side airbags deployed while I was driving without accident, causing injury to my arm, and bruising to my shoulder and neck. At the time of deployment, the vehicle was moving at a speed of approximately 25mph. Since there was no collision it is apparently a manufacture defect. I love my CTS and have had good service until now. My car has been at the Bryan Cadillac Dealership in Fayetteville, NC since August 24th and I have been without transportation since that time. I have contacted your company on several occasions to no avail. This vehicle serves as my only source of transportation. I have medical appointments twice a week from the injury to my left shoulder area and have to depend on friends to transport me to and from appointments. I have requested a rental vehicle while your company is taking their time with my claim and was told it could not be done and if I chose to rent a car, then I would not be reimbursed. I was told by Annette Rigdon (hired by GM) on Wednesday, September 9, 2009 that it would probably be several more weeks before I could get any results from her end. That is not acceptable. I am seeking your assistance in getting my vehicle back on the road as swiftly and safely as possible and a rental car while I am waiting. This situation has put undue and unnecessary mental and physical stress on me. It has been exactly one month today since the mechanical disaster. I am requesting a rental car TODAY, September 21, 2009 until my car is repaired. That is the least you can do for all my inconviences. If you have additional details related to my concern, I can be reached at (910) 476-1953. Sincerely, Janie Mack James Claim #677968
    Thanks for your vote!

    Reviewed Aug. 24, 2009

    Warranty for my 2006 Cadillac STS, with Michelin HXM tires, factory installed says bumper to bumper, including tires - 4 years or 50,000 miles. The car has 31,000 miles. It's three years old. Front tires need to be replaced. Tire has tread wear rating of 300 which should give 60,000 miles. Cadillac will not assist in replacement cost.

    Thanks for your vote!

    Reviewed Aug. 13, 2009

    I own a 2001 Cadillac Deville which I purchased in October of that year. For the most part I have been very pleased with my vehicle, but there is one issue that I believe is worthy of a recall. Back in 2006, the left rear window regulator failed and I subsequently had it repaired at the dealership at a cost of approximately $500. I assumed that this was just a fluke. However, about a month ago, my driver's door window regulator failed. I haven't repaired it yet, but I was able to wedge the window so it wouldn't slip down. On my way home from work this afternoon, the passenger side window regulator failed. I guess I only have to wait for the right rear window regulator to fail and I'll have to replace every one of the parts.

    I have been looking on the internet for news of a recall or other action by General Motors and I have not seen any. I have, however, seen plenty of complaints from other Cadillac owners regarding the same situation. Also, a few mechanics and others have given their professional opinion that this is a Cadillac design flaw. If it's a design flaw, then they should be responsible for repairing it, right? I currently own a 1999 Toyota 4Runner and I recently got rid of my 1987 Acura Integra. Each vehicle has power windows, but I have not had a bit of trouble out of either vehicle from that perspective. I love Cadillac cars and am considering buying another as soon as I can afford to buy. After this situation, however, I might have to stick with Toyota or Honda.

    I'm looking at repairs of approximately $1,000 for two windows at the present time. I had the left rear window repaired at the dealership a couple of years ago, so that would be $1,500 just for the defective window motor. When the right rear window fails, I'll have approximately $2,000 in window repair costs only. At this point, I'm ready to get rid of Cadillac and never purchase that make again.

    Thanks for your vote!

    Reviewed July 15, 2009

    My Cadillac CTS-V stopped working. I had it towed to the dealership so that they can identify what was wrong with the car. The dealer called back in a couple of days and stated that the number 2 piston came off and locked the engine up. In order for them to honor the warranty that covers the vehicle, I needed to come with receipts showing that the car had been regularly maintained. I had one receipt but no others. I had been maintaining the car myself and therefore didn't keep the receipts. According to the warranty manual, I shouldn't be denied coverage just because I don't have receipts. I have asked them to put in writing why they are denying my claim and they refused and said it is not in their practice to do so. I have been without my car now for a month and 3 days as of 6/12/09. I don't know what to do to get my car fixed under the warranty that covers it.

    Thanks for your vote!

    Reviewed June 21, 2009

    I replaced a driver’s side automatic window motor in my 1996 Cadillac to no avail. It did not fix the problem. I replaced it again. It is still not functioning properly after the Cadillac garage told me this was the problem. I also have a 2000 Cadillac driver’s side window that has the same issues. With all the money I have spent parts, labor in thousands of dollars to get things fixed that are not working properly, someone needs to put a stop to all this. If a part is replaced and it still does not function properly, I should be able to get my money back and the issue should be fixed free of charge, if they are capable of figuring out what the real problem is. I think the consumer should be more aware of these issues. I think service is pretty lousy.

    Thanks for your vote!

    Reviewed Feb. 4, 2009

    we bought a cadillac srx with 5000 miles from Brogan in Ridgewood NJ. They sold out and now the cadillac dealer on route 17 in mahwah nj is the dealer. the engine light came on and we promptly when there. they scheduled us to bring the car in on 2/3/09 which we did. the engine light went off before we took it in to them. consequently the week before when we were at this dealer the air condition button would not work, and it was registering hot but the guy there told us it was okay to drive which it was. yesterday before we took it to them the engine light came off, air con worked and the fan noise was gone. today they tell us we need to have the engine "flushed", new windshield wipers and new brakes. The wipers and brakes are fine and we let them do the flushing of the engine and change the oil which we knew had to be done. This is not right as the notices that we get on the car do not indicate anything wrong with the brakes. As well the guy told us the engine light was faulty and that was under warranty. I do not feel that they are being honest. with the economy the way it is they just want to make money off of us. the car takes forever to warm up as well. what can we do or whom can we report this abuse to. i have seen too many complaints from cadillac owners.
    Thanks for your vote!

    Reviewed Jan. 28, 2009

    I have had a strange occurrence. I have since; found a few cases on the internet. Want to know if this is a common occurrence. I was driving down the interstate on a cold night in January 2009 and my sunroof unexpectedly exploded. I call 911, did a police report. There were no cars in front or on the side of me and noting hit my 2008 Escalade. The sunroof just exploded and shattered. That was the beginning of my nightmare the other half came when I took my SUV to the nearest Cadillac dealer witch was Chancellor Motor Group in laurel. I called and notified GM about the problem to see if they would be willing to pay my $500 insurance deductible and they stated they would look in to it. They called me back and stated based on what the Dealership Chancellor Motor Group reported that a rock had hit my sunroof, they would not pay. When I Dropped off my SUV, the sunroof was shattered and almost gone. How Chancellor made that decision, I do not know. GM told me that someone name Kelvin told them that a rock had hit it. Kelvin had been rude to me when I had call to check on my SUV. When I called back, I reported him. Therefore, I guess he was getting me back. I never told him or any one at Chancellors that a rock hit me and had a police report that state that I did not know what had happen and I nor the Highway Patrolman were able to tell what had happen because no object was found in the truck with me. This occurrence is a hazard and I want this to go on record because the explosion cause glass to come in on me and could have cause me to lose control of the truck. I also could have been injured. The Chancellor motor group in Laurel has been very rude to me and lied on me. They have had my SUV for almost 2 weeks ordering the wrong part and just slowing around. I believe the sunroofs are defected and need to be looked at before they cause someone serious harm. If you are looking for good service department, do not go to Bob Palmer Chancellor Motor Group in Laurel MS and please do not ask for Kelvin in the service department.
    Thanks for your vote!

    Reviewed Jan. 2, 2009

    I took my Cadillac SRX into the dealer because of 2 recalls... one with the Catalytic Converter the other with the transmission... The next day after I got the car from the shop I was taking my 2 children to school and the car started smoking and the plastic cracked around the gear. I got the 4 children out of the car and 2 minutes later the car blow up fire and was destroyed. 2 fire trucks.... My neighbor took pictures I would be happy to send. 4 children, 2 weeks before Christmas and no car.

    Thanks for your vote!

    Reviewed Jan. 1, 2009

    My glass roof exploded in my 2005 Cadillac SRX. I was parked and sitting inside when I heard a loud explosion. I got out to check and noticed my roof shattered. Nothing hit glass. This car also had a glass roof replaced by original owner on 4-2008 at Crest Cadillac.

    Thanks for your vote!

    Reviewed Sept. 22, 2008

    Spontaneous acceleration: When you put your foot on the break-the vehicle accelerates forward;inability to stop the vehicle I have to ask anyone and everyone that has owned a Cadillac Escalade or any GMC vehicle if they think that their vehicle is a luxurious accident waiting to happen. I bought the vehicle Dec 17, 2003 and it was an 02. I felt like a million bucks leaving the dealership. I had a smile that went from ear to ear and an energy that said, I love life-until seven months later... I had complained about a malfunction of the breaks. It felt as though the ABS was engaging. I don't know if you can remember the sound an old ten speed bike used to make when you switch gears-the vibration and sound is what occurred when I would apply my foot to the break. At the time of my first complaint, I felt a delay and heard a sound when I applied the breaks-my truck did not come to a complete stop-it kept going. The dealership stated it was my tires. Obviously both GMC and its certified dealerships have not FIXED the problem so the issue has only gotten worse-I am afraid to drive it-its sitting pretty in the driveway. Here is a list of the history-of the Spontaneous acceleration. That's right my truck actually accelerates when you apply the brakes!! June 30, 2004 I had complained of the issues with my vehicle stopping. The dealership fixed the problem by putting on 4 brand new tires however did not describe why I was there in their reasons for diagnosing the tires being replaced .Therefore GMC is stating that the issues didn't actually occur or were not due to faulty/malfunctioning breaking system. Why should I be responsible for their documentation when I go in for service? Why would anyone have a second thought when someone who is certified is paid to diagnose and fix a problem? June 15, 2005 I had the same breaking issues and complained again to the, Certified dealership. They fixed the issue and replaced the rear break pads, rotors and rear brake shoes. June 16, 2006 Same issues/complaints of break malfunction. Certified dealership fixed the issue by replacing the front brake pads, resurfaced all four brake rotors June 22, 2006 Complained about breaking issue. The certified dealership Fixed the problem by replacing the Hub Bearing, replaced both ABS sensors and both bearings. My vehicle had 75, 000 miles on it at the time and was still under the certified preloved warranty. March 19, 2008 complained to GMC about the inability to stop since the warranty expired. Another certified dealership Fixed the breaking complaint with ANOTHER Hub bearing replacement. HHMM can you say HUB BEARING (I am guessing the part sucks and is defective) September 18,2008 Spoke with the GMC rep which is like speaking to a well scripted robot who is trained to deflect blame and/or responsibility. After describing the issues of NOT being able to STOP and the malfunctioning of the vehicle where it accelerates, the GMC rep asked again, So when do you have this issue? I said the following: Have you been listening at all to what I have said? Putting your foot on the break should be alot like blinking-we shouldn't have to think about it. When was the last time you had to worry if you stepped on the break that your vehicle will plow into the driver in front of you? The GMC rep said, I don't-So why don't you want to drive it to get diagnosed? -Get the picture? GMC and their customer service sucks. I was told in the very beginning that if I took my vehicle anywhere else other than a GMC certified technician or dealership-the warranty coverage for any issues would be at risk. Also the system that they use to diagnose is computerized. So if the computer doesn't say there is an issue-they meaning the GMC certified technicians assume there is no issue. When I called GMC in March of 2008 they were more interested in my next GMC purchase than what I was trying to complain about? Like I would EVER buy another GMC piece of ***. GMC kept reminding me that regardless of the number of attempts I have made to fix this ongoing issue with my break malfunction and the money that I have spent(time away from work, rental cars)-They won't take responsibility for a vehicle that is no longer under warranty, a vehicle that is 6yrs old and 105k miles. I have been a responsible owner and have been diligent in the maintenance of it. The breaks are only ONE of the many issues I have had with this truck-New radiator, new transmission, new ride control and another four tires when the Hub bearing was replaced the second time. Issues with the oil(lots of changes-not consistent with 2000 miles) GMC is known for not informing the public of their safety issues which Ralph Nader had exposed in a media filled public war which revealed to the public about GMC's unwillingness to take responsibilities for their knowledge of safety issues almost 30yrs ago. NOT much has changed except that their customer service reps have become more rude and repetitive in their rebuttals and counter objections-Dah-Why won't you drive your vehicle Ms. Gustafson?? Companies like GMC hope that consumer complaints will fade away into the backdrop when the consumer gets so frustrated and give up. I am not one of those people. Here is a list of some of their excuses: *It could have been a fluke *It could have been your driving-Hmm, I know I am Asian bit not all Asian drivers suck(not that this one is aware of) *You know that's common at slow speeds-My response is this So when I hit a pedestrian should I tell them that too? *We are not familiar with that issue with spontaneous/unexpected acceleration *You should warm up the vehicle before you drive less than 10 miles an hour *The sound is your muffler *There is no issue with the breaking system. we have not been able to duplicate your complaints, so there is nothing wrong The resistance to break could be the way you are applying your foot to the break pedal-WHAT????!!! My favorite response from GMC: I am so sorry you feel that way, I wish there is something we could do but it's not covered under warranty anymore. Your vehicle was not on the recall list. Yes the year and make was but your vehicle was not on the list for the recall.-When did vehicles have social security numbers? After my ordeal with GMC and the performance issues with my Escalade I am a firm believer that Fred Flintstone probably had a GMC and was the only one that was happy with their product. You see Fred Flintstone didn't care about breaks, airbags,stearing issues, seat belts, windshield wipers that could cause a fire, his car exploding, stalling on a highway....These are some of the many issues the public is raving about on the web regarding GMC vehicles and the safety issues that occur with all makes and models belonging to GMC. I have filed a complaint with NHTSA and have contacted several newspapers and consumer advocates. Only one person actually helped-a little. Doreen Geiger a consumer reporter from NBC placed a call to GMC and now I have to deal with The Executive office. When I asked the GMC rep what her title was she said, Executive office. I can only assume that she is not someone that can help, just another line of defense to make another disappointed consumer go away quietly. I have done so much searching on the web. The public outcry against GMC is overwhelming. SAFETY is not a priority GMC considers as important as the expensive crap it puts out for unknowing consumers. God help us all when they put out their electric car in 2010. Yippeee another disaster. Hopefully they will go bankrupt before they put out yet another vehicle with safety issues. All I want is for GMC to pay me the book value of my truck so that I can put it towards another vehicle that is not GMC. (They won't even pay for a tow to get my vehicle diagnosed. ) It's no wonder that Americans are buying more foreign vehicles and GMC sales are not what they used to be. It is hard for me to deal with the fact that I spent $53,109.00 prior to all the money I have spent in getting the breaks to operate properly.

    Thanks for your vote!

    Reviewed Sept. 16, 2008

    2004 Cadillac CTS-V 23 complaints raised affecting 9 different subsystems (Differential, Engine, Stability Control, Starter, Windshield, Radio, Trunk, Sunroof, Interior Trim) on 11 different unscheduled service visits. Repairs attempted 13 times (remaining 10 were attributed to me or overlooked), with 3 repairs successfully completed. At present, 6 issues remain unresolved, of which 4 are safety related. Oh...the check engine light is on now, too. Check http://neveragaingm.com

    Thanks for your vote!

    Reviewed Sept. 15, 2008

    The back bench seat flies forward with such great force when button is pushed that it does not stop when someone may be seated in front of it and next to it on other side and slams into them. It really hurt my arm/shoulder and bruised badly. I can only imagine what would happen if a baby or small child would of been sitting there in my place; it had enough force to seriously injure them.

    Thanks for your vote!

    Reviewed July 31, 2008

    I bought my Cadallic Sept of 2006. It was a brand new SRX. The same week I bought the car the dealer closed down without any notice. I have been hearing roaring noises that comes and goes in my truck. I noticed this about 6 months ago and I took it to Paul Conte dealer(Freeport NY). The first time I took my car in to get checked for this noise and to fix my sun-roof they told me that I needed to replace my back breaks(which I did but the noise was still there) and they never fixed the sun-roof.

    Now this is the second time that I dropped my car off because of the same nosie and now they said it's my front breaks/filters. Which I now replaced but my car is still making the noise. Paul Conte kept my car for 7 days to figure out what the problem was but they still can not figure it out. Paul Conte agrees that they hear this noise but they can't figure out why/where it's coming from. They called and told me that my car is drivable even with this nosie that comes and goes. I feel unsafe driving this car with my kids so I would like for them to figure out where this noise is coming from and fix my vehicle.

    Thanks for your vote!

    Reviewed July 28, 2008

    I have a 2000 Catera and was recently told basically the same thing as most. Due to the Dexcool Coolant, the seals have eroded away causing oil to mix will the coolant. Repairs quoted is a new radiator and Heater Cooling Valve. Also a single mom, I can't even work one repair into my budget so I requested AFAS assisitance. I asked about replacing one part now and the other later and was quoted one is detrimental to the other. Total cost for repair, $1896.00 plus tax all because of a faulty product GM has been well aware of. Instead of issuing a stinking maintenance message, there should have been a legitimate recall and all repairs afforded by GM at ZERO cost to the customer!

    Thanks for your vote!

    Reviewed July 9, 2008

    July 2008 General Motors Cadillac recall issued by NHTSA I took my vehicle to dealer and received invoice no charge parts replaced, four months later engine destroyed itself same as recall warned could happen. GM instructed I had to take vehicle to dealer that did the recall repairs, if due to recall they assist put new engine in vehicle. Nothing in writing would be provided. The dealership instructed I could not have a representative witness the tear down and determination of cause of damage. I found an independent repair shop and invited GM and dealership to tear down, they refused to come. The tear down revealed the new parts invoiced to correct recall were in fact not replaced. Two years later found an attorney to file lawsuit as neither GM or dealership would talk to me. General Motors settled for $ 5,000. Dealerships insurance company paid dealership defense and I ran up a $ 60,000 attorney fee I could not pay and had to give up, never got to trial. The NHTSA that issued the recall was kept informed, and never responded except were receiving my status of lawsuit communications. An auto recall is useless when all the manufacturer has to do is send the recalled vehicle to dealership that made the recall repairs and the consumer is refused to have an expert allowed to witness the diagnosis of failure. No dealership is going to say it is a recall matter that failed when they invoiced for parts they did not put in. The fact NHTSA allows this to happen at the American publics expense is my story. On top of that Iowa is the only state in the union that has no private cause of action for fraud, and consumer can not sue dealership for fraud.

    Thanks for your vote!

    Reviewed June 24, 2008

    After reading the recent article about GM engine fires, I feel compelled to write with my experience. I drive a 2004 Cadillac SRX, which is under warranty through GM and has not been modified in any way. On June 16th, 2008, I was leaving the grocery store when I smelled smoke in my vehicle. I drove approximately 20 feet from the building to see if I was pulling smoke in from an outside source, but when I was outside in the fresh air, I noticed that smoke was beginning to pour out of my vents. I left the vehicle and walked around trying to determine the source of the smoke. I opened the rear lift gate and found thick gray smoke pouring from the area behind the windshield wiper. It seemed to be the source of the smoke. At that point I called OnStar emergency services and they dispatched police and fire to my location. While on the line with OnStar, flames became visible from beneath the inside lift gate trim panel. The flames were approximately the size of the grapefruit and were partially blocked by the trim panel. Wiper fluid and melted plastic were dripping from the lift gate on to the bumper and into the interior of my vehicle. The wind was blowing into the vehicle and because I was concerned that the flames might move into the interior of the car, I made the decision to use my large drink to put out the fire before it got any larger. I successfully doused the fire about 30 seconds before the fire department arrived. They disassembled the rear lift gate down to the wiper motor, which appeared to be the source of the fire.

    The damage includes the entire lift gate door and trim, the wiper motor and circuit board, the rear bumper, and possibly the upholstered cover of the cargo area. I am now on day 8 of GM investigating the issue. They refuse to accept it as a warranty claim and instead have passed me through to the product allegation department where they did nothing but record my name and basic information for 2 days before passing me to another department. The other department says they need 7-10 business days to decide what they will do with the issue and I am not allowed to have any contact information for them unless they have not contacted me in 10 business days. Through all of this, I am being denied a rental car and they are holding my vehicle at the dealer, apparently having told the dealer to park it outside of their garage for safety reasons. I understand their need to investigate this claim. However, their refusal to offer me a rental car while they hold my vehicle is unacceptable and the only part of the situation that I do not understand. I would gladly give them all the time in the world if they could step up and stand behind their products and policies by giving me a rental car during their investigation. While my car sits at the dealer baking in the sun, not being aired out and still smelling of burning plastic and metal, my family is missing out on our summer plans. As residents of Janesville, WI we are duly impacted by the recent GM plant closings that will undoubtedly lower our property values, raise our taxes, and cause closings and cost increases for local businesses. I understand that they are having a tough year, but this is pennies in the grand scheme. I want this company to stand behind their product and show me that customer service is not dead. It's clearly a warranty issue and I should clearly be given a vehicle to drive while they are holding my car and not actively investigating or working on it. Obviously this isn't a case where I want to sue anyone. I just want others to know what buying a GM vehicle means AFTER the warm fuzzy dealer experience comes to an end.

    Thanks for your vote!

    Reviewed June 24, 2008

    I leased a 2008 Cadillac CTS in November 2007. The car has a problem accelarating. When you press on the accelerator the car stalls for a moment, then appears to catch and move forward. This defect creates a safety hazard especially when merging into oncoming traffic on busy streets and interstates. I took the car to Don Massey for service on 5/23/08 and was told that they are aware of the defect but it is an manufacturing error. Therefore, it can't be corrected and that I would just have to deal with it. I reported the problem to GMAC customer service department and was given a similiar response.

    Thanks for your vote!

    Reviewed June 11, 2008

    My car was in the shop 50 times with all different things they promised me a lease payment and that they would do something for all the problems I have had with my car and then when it came down to it they offered me gift cert for oil changes, as we speak my car is back in the shop...

    Thanks for your vote!

    Reviewed May 22, 2008

    I own a 2007 Cadillac Escalade EXT with 26,000 miles on the odometer. It had been making some unusual engine noises so I took it to Jessup Auto Plaza in Cathedral City, CA 92234 on May 6, 2007. They said it needed further diagnostic work and I left the vehicle. The next day or so they called and said that the engine was in bad shape. Lot of sludge in the engine and they told me it appeared that I never changed the oil. I told them that they were wrong, I had faxed them receipts and told them they were wrong and that the oil and filter had been changed (4) four times since new. I used Mobil 1 on two oil changes and then went to the best oil you can buy, Royal Purple.

    They stood fast and said Cadillac won't pay for the repair under warranty. They had a deal for me, I pay 1/2 of the $7,000 new engine. Some deal, vehicle cost over $60,000 and has a 100,000 mile warranty on drive train, but they are accusing me of never changing the oil. I filed complaint with GM Service Request # 71-627987190. Sent them all my documents, but got a call that they were not going to warranty engine, best offer was for me to pay half of repair and made it sound like they were doing me a favor. I agreed, but want to pursue whatever avenue of recourse I have to get my money back. Do not have vehicle back yet, still in repair shop.

    Researched internet and there are big issues with engine sludge and manufactures are blaming owners for neglect to get out of paying for repairs. Vehicle needs new engine and I am required to pay 1/2 repair bill of $7,000. Without vehicle for nearly a month fighting their claim of neglect.

    Thanks for your vote!

    Reviewed May 18, 2008

    09/30/05 purchased new 2006 Cadillac DTS 6/09/06 (9,250 miles)replaced cracked third brake light lense 07/25/06 (11,090 miles) brake vibration dealer resurfaced front & rear rotors 07/23/07 (22,229 miles) brake vibration radio quit, no flasher sound, no phone and no onstar-all radio connect problem third brake light lense cracked. lense was replace and they resurfaced rear rotors at this time 07/30/07 replaced radio (radio,flashers, on star & phone now ok 05/13/08 (30, 867 miles) brake vibraton resurfaced front rotors

    All complaints have fixed under warranty, at no charge to me. Cost to me is my time sitting in dealership, plus 60 mile round trip from Sherbunre to Utica. I paid for use of On Star and Phone even while not working. Did not buy this Cadi to sit in dealership for repairs!!!

    Thanks for your vote!

    Reviewed April 27, 2008

    07 cad cts caught fire from transmission jus after drive & parking, Total loss Fireman said started in transission. dealer said not warranty, call insurance I contacted GM and now 2 months later no determination on warranty?, or remedy

    Thanks for your vote!

    Reviewed April 6, 2008

    While driving in our 2005 Cadillac SRX SUV on the highway yesterday April 5,2008, our large sunroof literally exploded out of the blue. We were traveling at normal highway speed. Approx. 60 mph. There were no trucks beside us or anything that we saw or heard that might have caused the sunroof to shatter so suddenly. If the shade had not been drawn, I would have imagined we would have had some severe consequences as a result. I googled this issue and see that people have already reported this same issue to your organization. Has there been any additional information regarding this case? What would you advise us to do? This car is a danger to the public. Especially those that feel that this car would be a safe family car.


    If shade had not been drawn - glass would have showered down on all 3 passengers, not only possibly causing severe cuts but the loud explosion sound would also result in serious vehicle accident on highway.

    Thanks for your vote!

    Reviewed March 15, 2008

    2004 Cadillac Escalade jumped out of park and ran over me.

    Thanks for your vote!

    Reviewed Jan. 29, 2008

    For the past month I have been dealing with performance issues with a 2007 Cadillac CTS I leased. The rear tire had a flat due to a nail in the tire which was plugged. Since then I have been experiencing unsteadiness in the handling and performance of the car. I went to dealer and express my concerns and they charge me for an alignment which did not resolve the problem. I went back a second time and they balanced the tires and the problem did not go away. I returned to the dealer and informed them that the vehicle still did not perform as it should. I was then told to purchase new tires because the weight of the plug maybe causing the difference in the vehicle. I purchased new tires for the rear of the vehicle and the problem continued. I contacted GM and was instructed to go back to the dealership. I went back for the forth time and was told that the vehicle is driving as designed and that I maybe too in tuned with the vehicle.

    Frustrated I contacted GM again and was instructed to get a second opinion. I woke up early on a Saturday to find out that the service department is closed on Saturday. By then I was livid and went to ETD tires in Lyndhurst NJ who tested the tires and discovered a radial hop? in the tires and suggested that I contact Good Year. I traveled to Good Year in Paramus NJ and they acknowledge the problem with the tires and replaced them. After replacing the tires the problem continued and I went back to Good Year and they discovered that one of the new tires also has a radial hop? and replaced the tire.

    The problem is not as bad now but the vehicle continues to have a slight vibration in the steering wheel. I contacted GM and was told that they were sticking with Brogan diagnosis that the vehicle operates as design even after Good Year acknowledge that there was a problem with the tires. GM does not accept a diagnosis from Good Year although they sell the vehicle with Good Year tires. I am at my wits end and do not know where to go with the vehicle for repair. Please help

    Thanks for your vote!

    Reviewed Nov. 14, 2007

    I have a 2006 Cadillac STS with 35,000 miles driven. For the past 6000 miles, an increasing thumping noise has been emanating from the front wheels. Based on the mileage, I decided to make a brake service to the front wheels; i replaced brake pads and rotors with brand new parts. The thumping noise remained, so I brought it to the Cadillac dealer and their brief synopsis indicated that the tires were worn out, because there are flat spots on them causing the thumping; sounds logical.

    The problem is, Cadillac explicitly warrantys the tires from defects for full replacement during the Bumper to Bumper coverage of 5 year/50,000 miles. This seemed, and still seems, very unsettling to me because the tread life on the tires is still quite good. Bear in mind the mileage on the car (35000 miles), so it's quite likely that the tires would still be viable for another 10 to 15K miles before the tread is worn to the point of replacement. I decided to contact Michelin to discuss warranty coverage on these tires, because logic says that flat spots are not normal wear on any tire. They were very accommodating, and instructed me to bring the car into a retail service center that could analyze the tires for my warranty concerns. Sure enough, the technician discovered the flat spot, but only on one of the tires.

    This information was relayed back to Michelin and their response was that this is irregular wear, and not covered under warranty. Their analysis indicates that any wear of this type is mechanical in nature, and it is a root cause within the front end of the car; precisely my thoughts. Michelin was kind enough to extend a goodwill warranty offer of 25% off a tire replacement, based on a prorating of mileage. I indicated that I will bring up with Cadillac, because it should be a warranty issue of theirs.

    With this information, I contacted Cadillac customer service and opened a warranty complaint file. I specifically (and adamantly) requested that a regional representative from Cadillac come to the dealership to review the cars situation with me & the dealer's Service Manager. After fully disclosing all the information about the tread life (which Michelin clearly claims that there is a minimum of 3/32 active life left before the low level indicator bands are breeched) and that the flat spots are not normal tread wear in any sense of the word, and that I require a meeting to review the situation, a couple weeks passed. I received a call back from the customer service representative informing me that this is also not a warranty issue.

    This is the problem. I know that my car has an inherent problem; one that produces very irregular wear. This wear irregularity is currently a serious safety issue, and I need new tires before an incident happens. My contention is this; Cadillac is ignoring the underlying problem; blaming it on worn out tires, when in fact there is a major problem brewing. Now I will replace these tires, but the point is Cadillac really should be. They also should actively be reviewing the car front end for defects; the type which deteriorates critical safety components on my car. I am asking for help in this situation because I am very concerned for my family's safety in riding in this car.

    Thanks for your vote!

    Reviewed Nov. 6, 2007

    Took car to dealer four times for rough shift problem when cold. Escalated problem to customer service when told there is no way to fix problem. After detailed conversation I was told it could be escalated to a Field Rep but he would give me the same answer, if he is not too busy to speak with me...

    Thanks for your vote!

    Reviewed Nov. 5, 2007

    I was driving my 2003 Cadillac CTS in a parking lot, doing approximately 5 MPH while making a left turn. When the car turned itself off. I was charged $1,500.00 to replace the Power Steering Gear Rack.

    Thanks for your vote!

    Reviewed Oct. 8, 2007

    In June of this year, I purchased a 2004 certified preowned srx. I have had this vehicle leave me stranded on the road three separate times directly after the dealership reassured me that the vehicle had been fixed. It has been in for service on six different occasions it has also been towed five times by roadside assistance. I feel very unsafe in this vehicle especially being a mother I do not feel safe driving it with my children I have no idea of when it will give out on me and the ongoing issue has been my steering wheel completely stiffening up on me to the point where I can not turn the vehicle left or right I have been driving once already and this has happened almost causing me to cause an accident in the street. When the locking of the steering wheel happens the car loses power and completely shuts down. I travel very frequently and the dealership has made this a complete a total nightmare for me. I had to beg to receive a rental car while my car was being serviced, I have missed several days of work as a result of this, the dealership is literally trying to force me back into this vehicle and I am scared. I am scared for myself as well as my two small children.This vehicle is still under warranty.

    Thanks for your vote!

    Reviewed July 16, 2007

    i have a sts 2005 cadillac with 24,000 miles my tires are completly bald. i question the tire or mileage since i leased this car new. i had lots of cars and my tires were never bald at 24,000 miles. i called gm and thay were not any help.. i have a honda with 45000 miles tires look new. plenty of threads..

    Thanks for your vote!

    Reviewed April 15, 2007

    Driver door handle part ordered several month ago, and has not arrived at Cadillac Turnersville N.J. This part is needed for safety to open the door and to also pass inspection of auto. Part# 16619641. I ordered it two month ago.

    Door can't be open from the outside without this part. Several Cadillac Dealers also do not stock this part.

    Thanks for your vote!

    Reviewed April 11, 2007

    Liar Liar pants on fire! Those are the last words I actually said to the Customer service manager at the call center today. My issue: Brand Spanking New 2007 Black on Black totally loaded (yes every option) Escalade, Day after picking up the truck the power assisted running boards are not working. 6 miles on the truck. Now after 6 trips to the dealership and many calls with my personal customer service rep All the promises that were made have not been kept.

    Their promise (I have detailed records of conversations and I know for a fact that GM records their phone calls but they will not review what the rep actually said to me while I am on the line, there answer Sue GM to hear the tapes.) MR. x Right now we have no fix for your problem but our techs are working on a solution, Since you have had the truck only one day before you had a problem we will repay your lease payments.

    OK THREE PAYMENTS LATER my truck is finally fixed (I do not want to forget that GM knows my wife is very pregnant and I have falled out of the truck due to operational malfunction so I am very nervious about preggo wife getting in and out of truck) NOW GM IS ONLY GIVING ME 500 BUCKS. A big slap in the face since all the miles put on truck has been to drive back and forth to dealership.

    1700 miles at 9.5 mpg at $2.95 avg ppg (price per gallon NYC regular)that is a total of $527.00 Not to mention the mistreatment of customer service center to me (really bad very nasty) and to boot It took over 80 hours for a manager to contact me when I complained about the way I was treated. 68k truck zero customer service. I give up the only way I win is to never buy another GM car or truck ever agian + I am cancelling my GM credit card.

    Thanks for your vote!

    Reviewed Feb. 28, 2007

    In December of 2006, I purchased a 2005 Cadillac Escalade from Miller Madza-Kia-Suzuki.

    The vehilce had less than 20,000 miles and was sold with Bumper to Bumper warranty. I asked the salesman if the vehicle had been in any accident and he said no and he provided a Car Fax to show proof that it had not been in any accident. About one week after purchase, I took the vehicle in to Rountree Cadillac to have front light replaced and the mechanic told me the vehicle had been involved in some type of accident. The Body Shop gave me an estimate on everything that he found that needed to be repaired, that warranty would not cover because of prior damages and the vehicle had been repainted in some areas, he said that he would call the salesman at Miller Madza to let them know. About one week later, I took the vehicle back to Rountree for the Power Steering, Sun Roof making noise, the ignition buzzer not working, the back up indicator not working, the DVD/CD changer not working, the back radio control not working and a wire hanger inside under the front bumper. They told me most of this was warranty work but refused to repair the vehicle because it showed evidence of it being tampered with and in some type of accident that would void the warranty. Because of the relationship between the two dealerships they would not give this to me in writing. The Shop Supervisor or Service Consultant gave me a print out of what they found wrong and said they would again contact Miller Madza. After not hearing from either, I called the owner and told him what was going on with my vehicle and that his manager had said they were not going to spend any money on repairs. The owner asked me to drop the list of repairs needed to him and he would look over it and get back with me. He did not get back with me, so I went by his office, he asked me when could I leave the vehicle with him so that he could see what was wrong. I left the vehicle with him at that moment and he provided me with a loaner car to drive. I was told Miller Madza took the Escalade to Rountree Cadillac for repairs and they would not repair the vehicle because they felt like it had been in an accident and most of the bumper to bumper warranty had been voided. Miller Madza took my vehicle somewhere else to be repaired as of today it has been gone for three weeks, no one has called to tell me where my vehicle is or what is going on with it, I have to call them for information and get the run around.

    Thanks for your vote!

    Reviewed Nov. 20, 2006

    Installed a Remco transmission pump on a 2001 Cadillac DHS. Consquently the transmission burned up and could not determine if the cause was the transmission or the Remco pump. After learning a Remco Pump had been installed on the transmission, Cadillac advised the Cadillac dealer who was working on the vehicle that our vehicle warranty had been voided since we had installed an aftermarket item on the transmission. Remco (the after market item market mfgr) says Cadillac cannot void the warranty for that reason, due to protection by the Moss-Magnuson Warranty Act. But Cadillac did and I was forced to pay $3884.94 for a new transmission. If indeed Cadillac was at fault, think they should refund the monies I have expended for this repair.

    Transmission had to be totally replaced at a cost of $3884.94

    Thanks for your vote!

    Reviewed Nov. 16, 2006

    The use of many (more than 30 on the cadilac suv) led lights for brake and turn signal. I was behind a Cadilac suv at dusk and the led lights were totaly blinding, I could not even see other things around me. This is a hazard and needs to be addressed. Is there a regulating agency that states how bright rear lights can be?

    Thanks for your vote!

    Reviewed Aug. 11, 2006

    Cadillac CTS 2006 bought in spring of 2006 . I was driving down the highway when I heard a loud sound on my roof. When I stopped I could see my sunroof had imploded. it was like a volcano going up and shattering out.. obviously not from something landing on the roof. I tried to call the dealer I bought the car from, Brown Bros in louisville, but they wanted to charge me 2.5 times what the body shop my insurance company recommended uses and they wouldnt even give me a rental car for the time my car needed to be in their shop.

    I had to have the sunroof replaced. glass removed from my hand. My car needs painted but I cant afford that right now and dont want the insurance claim. so I have a car with less than 5000 miles that is far from new. I am out a day of work dealing with this and I really need a paint job.

    Thanks for your vote!

    Reviewed Oct. 11, 2005

    We bought a 2005 XLR in April of 2005. It is a new $76,000.00 vehicle. From two weeks after the purchase, the vehicle has spent over 40 days in the service department and has had over 8 major repairs. We have put on more then 1500 miles to take the vehicle to and from the dealership for repairs. We contacted Cadillac and complained about the difficulties with the car. We asked them to replace the vehicle with a new one and have them take it back.

    The mileage on the car when the first problem occurred was only 250 miles. Cadillac customer service said so what, just keep taking it back to get it fixed. They kept routing me to several different people who refused to help us. Finally, We involved the BBB Lemon Law and contacted as well as documented and filled out the appropriate paperwork. After a couple of weeks passed, Cadillac customer service called and said they were sorry about the car and offered us an extended warrenty!!!!! The car was still broke at the time and still in the dealership which is 170 miles from our home.

    I asked if they were joking? They said no. I called the BBB back and told them what they said. They continued to provide information and said that they have classifed our vehicle as a lemon and they would pass on this information to Cadillac. Another week or so goes by and cadillac calls and says, there is nothing they can do and we should take the extended warranty! I said they were crazy and that we would pursue this. Finally after many phonecalls, Cadillac called us and said they would replace the vehicle with an identical one.

    My wife and I were happy. After another week Cadillac calls back and says they will not provide another car. I said there was one in another state not much farther. They said that the dealship refuses to do the exchange. They said they will not offer another replacement car and now they were work on repurchasing!

    First before we go any further, The settlement up to this point though also included a mileage usage. They want to charge us for mileage usage based on 2100 miles. WE explained that we didn't put on those miles. The miles were put on because the car was broke and had to be driven to the dealership. 80 percent of the XlR miles were to and from the dealership for repairs. Cadillac didn't care! The vehicle now has 2500 miles on it and is sitting in the garage with electrical problems. WE cannot drive it for mileage reasons as well as problems, yet we still have to pay insurance and payments.

    Now repurchasing has started and now they want to deduct another 3000 for something the dealership did when we bought the car. They stated the dealership overinflated the price of our tradein. I said no they didn't. We traded in a 2003 Cadillac Escalade EXT Loaded with only 6000 miles on it. It was in perfect condition. Not a scratch or dent or ding. The interior was immaculate. They wont tell us how much the dealership resold the vehicle for nor do they take in to fact that we paid full price for the XLR except for a 1000 dollar rebate at the time. Cadillac still refuses to agree to the mileage and this overpayment issue. They have given us nothing but a nightmare with rude and disrespectful phone calls. They are changing the rules to suit there needs and don't care or stand behind there products.

    As a result of the XLR being a lemon, my wife went out and purchased a new car to drive while the cadillac was being repaired so often. Cadillac was also being difficult on their rental policy and wanted to charge us for rental use while the XLR was being repaired. We are out thouands of dollars for payments and insurance as well as time and money for gas. We are out a windshield for our other vehicle when we went to go pick it up. I personnally made two of the trips to pick up the car when it was fixed, only to find out it was still broke and had to leave it at the dealership. We are so stressed and upset with this whole experience. We will never ever buy another GM product again. We will continue to fight Cadillac for what we believe is right. We started out with a brand new 80,000 dollar car and ended up with a piece of junk that cadillac cares less about.

    Thanks for your vote!

    Reviewed Sept. 26, 2004

    After thousands of dollars, upkeep with scheduled maintenace, still I have many problems with my cadillac catera, the most recent is the transmission. It failed on 09/09/04, I had the transmission serviced at 50,000mi after the engine was replaced. Before that there was an engine oil coolant leak, in which they pretended to not know of. I have made a complaint with NHTSA, someone has written their complaint exactly as mine so I know this is a lemon car. Cadillac thought it will be a remedy to give me $1500.00 owner loyalty certificate.

    Thanks for your vote!

    Reviewed June 6, 2003

    I purchased a 97 Cadillac Deville with 11,ooo miles expecting a quality car. My car has been consuming excess oil after about 30-40 thousand miles. The car now has close to 97,000 miles and the problem has not been resolved. Many other cadillacs of all years and style have been consuming oil, including 2003 models. It has not been brought to the pulics attention yet, and I have heard myself dealership telling people it is normal and no big deal. I have spent a lot of time trying to fix this probelm and trying to get acnoledgement that it was a problem

    My engine has gone through decarbonizing, parts have been replaced, which took one month to complete. I have another apointment for decarbonizing. I have paid a lot in deductables I have added oil between 3,000 mile oil changes, and have had to drive lesser quailty rental cars. My time is important to me and proving it was burning oil, any trying to resolve this problem and getting nowhere is very frustrating. I have read letters on the internet by other who have had this problem, some resolve some not. But I know it is a problem across the country.

    Thanks for your vote!

    Reviewed May 7, 2003

    This first started in March 1999. We wanted an affordable luxury automobile, and we were impressed by our test drive of a 1999 Cadillac Catera, so we ordered a fully equipped ivory white version, with dealer-installed rear spoiler. The car looks somewhat bland, but attractive, but from the day we drove it out of the showroom, there were problems. Rattles, rattles, all over the place, and as soon as some were eliminated, others appeared. But the worst part of it all was the awful quality control. We had half a dozen cooling system failiures, four battery replacements, replacements of an assortment of parts that included the ignition lock, brake light switch (a serious potential safety hazard), oxygen sensor, and gas cap cover. In addition, we suffered from mysterious and annoying driveline noises, spongy brakes, increasingly poor steering wheel response, and a strange vibration from the transmission stick.

    Although the local dealers were reasonably accommodating, they could never quite get a handle on the extent of the troubles. As of the day the car was turned in at the end of the lease, and after 24 service visits, the car still shuddered when applying the brakes at 45 miles per hour, and the transmission stick rattled at that speed during breaking and over bumps. The radio still couldn't remember a station when you turn it off, and various and sundry rattles still persisted. Worse, when the dealer fixed a damanged door jamb, they broke a fitting on the inside door handle and tore some of the rubber molding.

    This is but a small part of the ills that plagued us with the 1999 Catera. All Cadillac would offer when we repeatedly asked them to buy it back was an insult, an offer of a $2,000 incentive towards purchase of another Cadillac. Fat chance. General Motors, you lost a customer for life with this turkey. May 2003 Update: Before the vehicle was returned to the dealer at the end of the lease, I had it inspected by a certified mechanic and was stunned to discover that the problems were worse than I imagined, with serious defects still present with the brakes, driveline and steering mechanism. In short, the car was unsafe to drive. Note that this mechanic is not in the business of doing repairs himself and thus isn't inflating the severity of the defects to make some money. Actually, he provides consulting services and serves as an expert witness for a local lemon law attorney.

    Upon learning that GM Chairman Jack Smith was retiring on May 1st, I wrote a letter to him, not expecting a response. Early in May, someone from the executive office called and said they had reviewed the information but could not grant my request for a few refund because I no longer owned the car. As if that had anything to do with it. Clearly, GM is not capable of satisfying the many disappointed customers who have been inconvenienced with this defective model.

    Thanks for your vote!

    Reviewed Sept. 15, 2002

    Purchase a Cadillac Deville 2001 model with full warranty. Dealer did not disclose that vehicle had transmission problems. We began experience problems with jerking after about seven months. Vehicle has been in the shop nine times without being fixed. Each time the vehicle is returned the same problem reoccurs. Dealer nor Cadillac will take responsibility for having the vehicle fixed even though it was under warranty when the problem occurred. We are paying for a Cadillac that is unreliable, that we cannot take on an extended trip with any degree of comfort. The last time it was in the shop the dealer had it five and half weeks and it was returned with an additional 654 miles.

    My wife drove the car to work and it started jerking so badly she was afraid for her life as well as other drivers because she was unsure as to what was going to happen to the car. The car grabbed so severely during the jerking period that the seat belt tightened. Cadillac's customer assistance center tells us that they can'do anything because Larry's Carland in Blackstone, VA, where the vehicle was purchased will not give them cause to repair the car. Everytime it goes to the shop they fix something other than the transmission itself.

    The dealers have had this car almost as much as we have. I feel that I am paying for a car that is unreliable and cannot be safely driven. I feel that Cadillac should either replace the car or the transmission since the problem occurred under warranty. The car was purchased in March 2001 and the first time it went to the shop was September 2001. When my wife called the Cadillac Assistance Center, the first two ladies promised to help but did not follow through. We seem to get a different person each time we contact Cadillac.

    Thanks for your vote!
    Loading more reviews...

    Cadillac Company Information

    Company Name:
    Cadillac
    Website:
    www.cadillac.com