CONSUMER NEWS    RECALLS    COMPLAINT FORM    SCAM ALERTS  


Complain about a product or service

Small Claims Guide | Class Actions | Lemon Law | FAQ | Resources | Newsletters | Spanish
Automotive    Education    Electronics    Family    Finance    Health    Homeowners    Shopping    Travel   
NEWS   Latest |  Archives |  Auto |  Cells, etc. |  Computers |  Financial |  Health |  Homeowners |  Parents |  Privacy |  Scams |  Seniors |  Travel

FDA Disputes Pet Food Pain Killer Findings

But Texas Lab Stands by Its Test Results



By Lisa Wade McCormick
ConsumerAffairs.com

Copyright 2007 © All Rights Reserved

June 15, 2007

RECALL LIST
Consumer Complaints
---
News
Illness, Death Dog Nutro Pet Food
Feds Raid PETCO Warehouse in Illinois
Pet Owners Not Thrilled with Poison Food Settlement
CDC Links 2006 Salmonella Outbreak to Dog Food
FDA Orders Illinois Pet Food Maker to Clean Up Its Act
String of Illnesses Afflicts NUTRO-Fed Pets
Pet Owners Not Thrilled with Poisoning Settlement
Menu Foods Settles Pet Food Class Action
Many Pet Foods Still Missing From Store Shelves
Pet Owners Cheer Indictments in Toxic Pet Food Case
Indictments in Toxic Pet Food Case
Diamond Pet Foods Agrees To $3.1 Million Settlement
Tests Find More Toxic Pet Toys
Finding Safe Toys to Give Your Pet
China Agrees to Stepped-Up Food, Drug Inspections
Menu Foods Denies Acetaminophen Found in its Cat Food
Veterinarians Solve Pet Food Death Puzzle
Menu Foods Agrees to Test for Pain Killer in its Cat Food
Lab Tests Again Find Acetaminophen in Pet Food
Toxic Pet Toys: A Doctor's Advice
Consumers Respond to Toxic Wal-Mart Pet Toy Stories
Federal Import Safety Panel Outlines Proposals
Pet Industry Agrees on Need for Toxicity Standards
Industry Responds to Reports of Lead in Wal-Mart Pet Toys
Wal-Mart Attacks Lab Tests that Found Lead, Chromium in Pet Toys
Wal-Mart Reviewing Results of Tests on China-Made Pet Toys
Lab Tests Find Lead, Other Toxins in Pet Toys Sold at Wal-Mart
CANIDAE Denies Reports of Painkiller in its Pet Food
Lab Tests Find Painkiller in Samples of Pet Food
Purina Denies Claim on Bichon Frise Deaths
FDA Blocks Nutro Pet Food Shipment from Entering U.S.
FDA Testing Dog Treats Pulled from Wal-Mart Shelves
Wal-Mart Finds Melamine in Chinese-Made Dog Treats
---
More about Pet Food Recalls ...

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is disputing the findings of a Texas laboratory that reported it discovered the pain killer acetaminophen in some brands of pet food.

The FDA said it didn’t find acetaminophen in a handful of samples of dog and cat food it tested in the past week, according to The Pittsburgh Tribune-Review.

"We cannot validate their finding,” Julie Zawisza, assistant commissioner of public affairs for the FDA told the newspaper.

But ConsumerAffairs.com learned the FDA cannot confirm it tested the same lots and brands in which the Texas laboratory -- ExperTox, Inc. -- detected the pain medication.

“This case is not closed,” Donna Coneley, lab manager with ExperTox, Inc. told us. “They’re (FDA) still requesting samples and data from us. We’ve talked to them three times today. I don’t see by any means that this is over. If it was over and done with, why would they bother spending so much time with us on the phone and arranging for samples to be released?”

Asked about the FDA’s comment to the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review, Coneley responded: “I don’t know their reasoning. What I do know is that when they told me they tested a few samples of cat and dog food, I asked them if they were the same lots and brands that we tested. And they couldn’t confirm that any of them were the same ones we tested.”

“We’re using two completely different testing instruments to detect those chemical, and the difference comes into play with the instruments and the instrumentation (used) to detect those chemical,” she added.

Coneley said her lab tested 100 to 150 samples of pet food -- and detected acetaminophen in five of those samples.

The FDA, she said, tested just a few samples of pet food for the pain killer.

“It’s easier to say that we can’t confirm something by looking at a few samples than to really investigate and continue investigating until you know something for sure,” Coneley said. “I think this might have been a quick way to get everyone off their (FDA) backs.”

"Imaginary Experts"

Could those “everyones” be the Pet Food Institute (PFI), which represents the makers of 98 percent of all dog and cat food produced in the United States and calls itself “the voice of U.S. pet food manufacturers?”

“Maybe there was pressure from them,” Coneley said.

As we reported on Wednesday, PFI cast doubts on ExperTox’s finding.

“Through our contacts in Texas, which is where the lab is located that conducted the analysis, we have learned there is genuine concern among key toxicological and analytical experts about the lab and the actual test results,” said PFI spokesman Kurt Gallagher.

Coneley questioned what experts PFI was talking about.

“They never name the experts they’re working with,” she said on Wednesday. “When someone says ‘people I know say this,’ it sounds to me like they’re trying to say there are experts who have looked into this and don’t agree with the findings. But I don’t believe there are.

“To me, it sounds like they’re talking about imaginary experts. The (scientists at the) FDA are the only people we’ve been talking to about our findings.”

Coneley told us today that her lab will continue working closely with the FDA and hopes to foster its relationship with that federal agency.

“We don’t want to build any animosity with the FDA,” she said. “It’s in our best interest to help them see what we’re seeing.”

Other Contaminants

As we reported, acetaminophen isn’t the only contaminant ExperTox discovered in the samples of pet food it tested in May.

The lab found the chemical cyanuric acid -- commonly used in pool chlorination -- in some samples.

And in other samples, it detected the chemical that triggered the March 2007 recall of millions of containers of dog and cat food: melamine.

The FDA discovered melamine in the wheat gluten and rice protein concentrate imported from China and used in the more than 5,600 products that pet food makers have recalled in the past three months.

The chemical -- used to make plastics and fertilizers -- is blamed for the illnesses and deaths of thousands of pets nationwide. It is not approved for use in pet or human food.

ExperTox did not identify the brands of food it tested because of a confidentiality agreement.

Menu Foods

But ConsumerAffairs.com confirmed one of the brands that tested positive for acetaminophen is Menu Food’s Pet Pride.

Pet owner Don Earl of Port Townsend, Washington, told us he hired ExperTox to analyze samples of Pet Pride "Turkey and Giblets Dinner" and Pet Pride "Mixed Grill.”

He says he took that action because his cat “Chuckles” suffered kidney disease and died in January after eating those flavors of Pet Pride food.

He also told us that ExperTox analyzed the same lots and styles of Pet Pride food that he fed Chuckles before she died.

We reviewed ExperTox’s findings of the samples Earl submitted, which confirmed the lab detected acetaminophen in the food.

The tests also detected cyanuric acid in the samples of Pet Pride food. Those samples, however, did not contain any melamine, the report stated.

Menu Foods declined to comment on ExperTox’s finding and referred calls to the PFI.

As usual, the FDA did not return our telephone calls or e-mails seeking comment.

Pet owner Earl, however, criticized the FDA for making what he called “unsubstantiated claims” about ExperTox and its findings.

“At the time of the article, the FDA had not tested any of the samples tested by ExperTox,” he told us today. “It is also of interest that in an attempt to get a second opinion on one of the two varieties of pet food I had tested by ExperTox, I submitted a separate sample to UC Davis, only to later find that UC Davis is a major recipient of pet food company funding. Under the circumstances, it is my firmly held belief that if the FDA is going to make these kinds of unsubstantiated claims, their methods should be publicly examined along side those on the cutting edge of these findings.”

He added: “It has been three months since the recall was announced and pet owners still don't have any hard answers as to how and why this happened, or what is safe to feed their pets.”



Report Your Experience
If you've had a bad experience -- or a good one -- with a consumer product or service, we'd like to hear about it. All complaints are reviewed by class action attorneys and are considered for publication on our site. Knowledge is power! Help spread the word. File your consumer report now.


Consumer News

July 6 2008

Recent Recalls & Safety Alerts

Print, mail, etc.




FREE CONSUMER NEWSLETTERS

The Daily Consumer
Afternoons M-F

Sign up now!


Consumer News & Alerts
Every Sunday

Sign up now!


Knowledge is free.
Knowledge is power.



Back to the top |

Advertisement


Home | Rogues Gallery | Good Guys | Complaint Form | News | Recalls | Search | Video | FAQ |
Consumer Resources | Small Claims Guide | Lemon Law | Newsletter | Contact Us
Advertise With Us | Testimonials | Newsroom | RSS Feeds | Radio | Job Postings




Terms of Use Your use of this site constitutes acceptance of the Terms of Use

Advertisements on this site are placed and controlled by outside advertising networks. ConsumerAffairs.com does not evaluate or endorse the products and services advertised. See the FAQ for more information.

Company Response Welcome If complaints about your company appear on our site, we welcome your response. Please see the Response Form for more information.

For more information, see the FAQ and privacy policy. The information on this Web site is general in nature and is not intended as a substitute for competent legal advice.  ConsumerAffairs.com Inc. makes no representation as to the accuracy of the information herein provided and assumes no liability for any damages or loss arising from the use thereof. 

Copyright © 2003-2008 ConsumerAffairs.com Inc.  All Rights Reserved.