
Suzuki Reviews
- We require contact information to ensure our reviewers are real.
- Our moderators read all reviews to verify quality and helpfulness.
- We use intelligent software that helps us maintain the integrity of reviews.
About Suzuki
- Good fuel efficiency
- Spacious interior
- Affordable maintenance
- Frequent mechanical issues
- Poor customer service
- Limited parts availability
Suzuki Reviews
Filter by Rating
- (4)
- (2)
- (3)
- (15)
- (58)
Popular Mentions
- 4,894,851 reviews on ConsumerAffairs are verified.
- We require contact information to ensure our reviewers are real.
- We use intelligent software that helps us maintain the integrity of reviews.
- Our moderators read all reviews to verify quality and helpfulness.
Recent
- Recent
- Oldest
- Most helpful
A link has directed you to this review. Its location on this page may change next time you visit.
- 4,894,851 reviews on ConsumerAffairs are verified.
- We require contact information to ensure our reviewers are real.
- We use intelligent software that helps us maintain the integrity of reviews.
- Our moderators read all reviews to verify quality and helpfulness.
Reviewed Nov. 21, 2011
I purchased two brand new 2008 vehicles in December 2007. One of the vehicles broke down. The dealer I bought the car from is now out of business, as well as the other local dealer in my area. The one dealer is located 45 minutes away and I can't see my vehicle for at least 2 months. I called Suzuki and they want me to tow the vehicle to a dealership in NJ, CT or PA which means another $300-$500 in towing on top of the $200 I already paid.
To see if it is an issue covered under the warranty, I have tried calling their corporate office and they just keep routing me back to the same customer service person to tell me how sorry they are, and there is nothing more they can do.
I am now paying to have the car fixed out of pocket at a cost of $1200.00 for an issue the dealer supposedly fixed (replacing timing chain) in 09/10. The extended warranty might as well be toilet paper. I will never recommend this brand to anyone! Worst part, I still have another Suzuki vehicle that, God forbid, if it breaks down, will also have a worthless warranty. I spent over $55000.00 between the two vehicles and extended warranties, and for what?
Reviewed Nov. 18, 2011
I purchased Access 125, from Suzuki authorized dealer Sree Sai two wheelers pvt. Ltd (Location - Teen Hath Naka, Thane(W)) on 23/06/2011. I have given bike for first servicing on 27/08/2011 at its service center located at Louiswadi Thane(W). I have also asked them to check and repair the battery (Make -Exide) as same was causing problems during start. I received my bike after serving on 29/08/2011. Immediately I notified at service center that the battery problem has still not been corrected. So I had submitted battery at service center, however no receipt was handed over to me even after my insistence. They informed me that it was not necessary and asked to me call me on 10th Sept, 2011 for the status of battery.
I checked for status twice after 10th Sept, 2011, but only got reply that they will call me as soon as they get the battery. I have still not received the repaired battery till date. This is really frustrating. After that, I had again given my bike for servicing on 12/11/2011, and again complained for non receipt of battery. Now they say that they need to check with Exide about the battery and asked me to call on 14/11/2011. Once again I called them on 14/11/2011 & 15/11/2011, but no response yet. I am getting no support from the service center and no status of the repaired battery. Please help.
Reviewed Nov. 11, 2011
I purchased a new Suzuki SX4, 6 Speed Manual Transmission vehicle approximately 1 year ago, from Bobb Suzuki, in Columbus, Ohio. My vehicle has been in for service 4 separate times, all within 16,400 miles for the same issue. It will not go into reverse. The dealership has attempted to fix the matter every time, and also put in a new transmission at approximately 6000 miles, but to no avail. I do not feel safe in this vehicle, and it has caused me to take days off work to take the vehicle in for repairs.
I feel that due to the fact that my vehicle fits all of the guidelines for the Ohio Revised Code that pertains to the "Lemon Law", I would like to pursue this matter further. I feel unsafe in this vehicle, and do not want to drive it long distances because of it. I would like to get final restitution with my vehicle, whether they purchase it back or I purchase another vehicle. Thank you.
Reviewed Nov. 4, 2011
I purchased my Suzuki SX4 in April 2008 from a dealer here in Plattsburgh, NY. The car seemed to be well made for the price. And the car had a decent safety rating, had good gas mileage, and was AWD. It seemed like everything we needed in a car. The dealer sold a good story. I wish I would have done some research on Suzuki before I made this purchase. After completing the paperwork, I drove the car home with a smile. This was the first brand new car I have ever owned and was looking forward to driving it. I parked the car that night with 30 miles on it. The next morning, I woke up to find my mirrors had shorted and caused them to split. I called the dealer first thing in the morning. They told me to drop it off and they would fix it, no problem. I did and they had the car back to me that day. Then next morning, the heated mirrors did not work. But I figured that it was not a big deal since I had dealt with worse in my previous cars, so I did not mention it.
The car drove well for all of 2008 and 2009. But then in 2010, when I went to get the car inspected, I was informed that the wheel barring in the driver side rear needed to be replaced. And because the wheel barring had gone bad, it caused one tire to wear more than the other. So, my tires would need to be replaced. I ended up paying for 2 rear tires and they fixed the wheel baring. The bearing had to be ordered so I was out a car for 2 days. I asked for a rental car and was told no.
I was pretty unhappy, but I let it slide because they were fixing the bearing. Then, not 2 weeks later, we started to hear a really weird noise coming from the front end of the car. So, I brought it back in and it turned out that the CV joint had fallen apart. So, that needed to be replaced. Again, I was without my car for 2 days and they would not pay for a rental. Then about 6 months later, I started hearing a really weird clanking noise in the center of the car. So, I brought it back in and it turned out that the whole drive shaft needed to be replaced. This was going to be a week without my car. I asked for a rental and was told no. At this point, I was furious.
I called Suzuki Direct and got quite possibly the worst customer service in my life. The lady I spoke to was horribly rude. She said that basically I was out of luck, because I had a payment on my car and there was nothing they could do for me other than fix the car. I have worked for a call center for 8 years and I have been trained by my customers on how a CSR is supposed to act. This lady was rude and mean. So, I told her that Suzuki cars were a piece of junk and that I would never buy another one. It turned out that may have gotten someone’s attention because the next day, I got a call from the dealer offering me a rental for the week.
Things seemed to be going good until I just recently had to get the car inspected again. Guess what? It needs a new wheel bearing and a tie rod. They will replace the wheel bearing at no cost but they want $300.00 to replace the tie rod. I told them that they could keep the tie rod and I would get the car fixed somewhere else. I called Suzuki Direct and told them that if I did not get some kind of compensation, then I would be posting all over the internet about what a horrible car they make. I was told that it was my choice and that I was out of luck. I have had it with the customer service that this company offers. They have no business, even making cars. They are cheap to buy but expensive to own. Their customer service is the worst and must not want a repeat customer. Please stay away and think twice about purchasing their products.
Reviewed Oct. 27, 2011
On April 23, 2007, we purchased a 2007 Suzuki SX 4 from Johnny's Suzuki in Summerville, SC. Until early July 2010, we had no complaints. Then, there was knocking side in engine, which turned out to be the lifter and rocker arms went out on the engine. The engine was replaced under warranty. Late July 2010, the cooling system went out and we had to pay $680.00 to have it repaired in order to have air conditioning in Charleston, SC heat. August 2010, the airbag sensor went out in the passenger seat. The dealership wanted ton of money to fix that. I said a few choice words and left. I called NTSB, then Suzuki Corp. in Brea, CA and demanded it be fixed as it was a safety issue and they did, at no charge. The steering system was replaced as goodwill gesture from the dealership.
On October 23, 2011, the airbag sensor light came on for the driver's side airbag. I contacted the dealership and for $75.00, they can look at it. I said no. I contacted NTSB for this issue and Suzuki Corp. in Brea, CA. The CSR told me that there was nothing they could do for me since I had no intention of owning another Suzuki. Also, they told me that I should not drive the vehicle as the airbag may not work. I'm currently exploring all options and telling everyone I know not to ever buy a Suzuki a.k.a POS.
Reviewed Oct. 20, 2011
I've been having a couple of problems on my car since the day that I bought it. I have pointed out the problem during the 1st & 2nd service but until now, the problem exists. All the while, the servicemen from the Platinum Service Center thought that they fixed it, and the last response was unsatisfactory for me. So I raised the complaint to Suzuki Kuala Lumpur Customer Complaint Department, attended by a girl named by Herni. But up until now, no proper response was given to me.
The 2 problems on my car is listed below.
1) The keyless go button was malfunctioning intermittently since Day 1.2) A burning smell goes inside the car while driving at a speed of 120 km/h.
PS: The main reason I chose this car is it was designed in Japan and I believe that the service quality should be tip-top but now, I regret choosing this car.
Reviewed Oct. 7, 2011
On 10/04/2011, I was traveling with my pregnant sister and a friend in my 2008 Suzuki XL-7, when I made a left turn and my steering wheel stuck and would not return to center and caused us to make an unintended U- turn striking a utility pole causing extensive damage to the vehicle. To our astonishment there were no airbags deployments to protect us from injury. My dad is an ASE master technician with 35yrs experience and he stated that it appeared to him that the steering gear had stuck in position causing the accident and due to the area and extent of the damage, the airbag system should have deployed to protect the occupants. We are contacting a lawyer for product liability suit.
Reviewed Sept. 8, 2011
I will try to sum this up. I purchased my car from a South Carolina dealer in 2007. By 2008, this dealership experienced a lawsuit and went out of business. I reside in Charlotte NC, and the there's only 1 Suzuki dealer in Charlotte.
First, I had a knocking sound that seemed to be coming from the rear of the car within a year of purchase, and my lumbar support handle broke. They fixed that and changed out some struts.
The knocking sound was still around after the strut repair in 2008 or 2009, so I took it in again and of course they couldn't find anything. In 2010, I had new set of tires put on my car and the tire guy referred me to Firestone to get a wheel alignment. Firestone advised I needed new struts. Of course, I took it back to the Planet Suzuki dealer because I remembered they'd replaced struts already. They kept my car most of the day and claimed they replaced my struts. By this time my warranty had just expired, but Perry advised he'd doctor up some miles to get it covered under warranty. I didn't see why he would have had to do so if they'd fix the struts to begin with, but that was the verbal agreement and by that time, my car actually didn't have lots of miles on it because I've always worked near my home. Well of course the knocking sound hasn't gone away, and he tried to tell me it was because of the gas I was putting in the car. He also tried to tell me the struts were like that because of the new tires, because I got the alternate size because the dealer is the only place to find this odd ** 15 tire size that are extremely overpriced. The tire guy and Firestone reps told me that the tire size I have is fine. So I told the Suzuki dealer to stop trying to put this on the tires and fix my car, as I've brought it in numerous times for different things. Oh and I forgot to mention that one time, when I brought it in for the knocking, they actually tried to tell me it the was the license plate taped it down. How stupid is that, or should I say, how stupid they think I was. I truly feel that they were mishandling me because I'm a woman. I emailed Perry after the supposed final repairs of the struts that they still felt like it's the same, and he gave me a very nasty response. I also emailed Suzuki direct with no assistance, as they stated they wouldn't handle this matter, and I don't think that's fair.
Not to mention the paint chipping from door handles, which I've found numerous other review complaints on many different sites.
I still have my car and I just want it fixed correctly. I feel like they were avoiding fixing my car correctly for some reason and I don't understand why. I feel I was being dealt with in a certain way because I'm a woman. I also feel the representative from their company showed poor customer service with his email response, as he told me to go elsewhere if I didn't care for their service because I threatened to complain. Dealerships shouldn't be able to get away with that type of service or treatment. I just want my car repaired correctly!
I hope this receives the attention it deserves so something can be done about this dealership.
Reviewed Aug. 16, 2011
I paid cash for a Suzuki Equator for my wife. It has less than 10,000 miles on it. After delivery, we noticed that Jeff Field's Suzuki had replaced the logo on the tailgate and left a drilled hole exposed. This has lead to water accumulating in the tailgate.
Shortly after this, an area of approximately 8"x4" in the bed of the truck had paint beginning to peel. We contacted the dealer and they stated they could do nothing without their regional representative seeing it. We have never been able to get to see the regional representative in order to get the solution. The dealership service department did send pictures.
We have now relocated to Springfield, MO and contacted the local dealership. They told us we would be contacted by the regional representative from this area some months ago. We are still waiting. This is a great vehicle but customer follow-up is extremely poor. The warranty is running and I do not want to resort to judicial review of the matter. But Suzuki's non-responsiveness may force me to do so.
Reviewed Aug. 11, 2011
We had purchased an extended warranty Platinum Protection Plan. When we needed a repair done, my wife had to call the warranty company to get the authorization number. The warranty company could not believe that she had to do this as the service department was under the terms of the contract and were obliged to do this.
The service representative told my wife he did not want to "get involved with the insurance company" and we were "lucky to get 100,000 km out of our Vitara," then told my son that's why he drives a Toyota. He also refused to make the arrangement to have a hire car sent to the dealership for my wife because "that's up to you, I don't want anything to do with that either."
We like the vehicle but due to the customer service shown by this dealer, we will not buy another Suzuki.
Reviewed July 29, 2011
Bought a XL7 Suzuki and at 23,000 miles, I had to have the rack and pinion steering replaced due to excessive high-pitched whirring in the steering wheel. It was under warranty but a year and a few months later the whirring has returned. Suzuki won't cover the obvious defect because they say the warranty has lapsed, so they want $1100 to repair. Then at 42,000 miles, I had to have a new transmission replaced. It was under warranty. Their product is cheap, dangerous and pure crap.
Reviewed July 15, 2011
I purchased a Suzuki Alto from Suzuki Defence Motors on the month of August 2008. Unfortunately, it has fallen short of my expectations. All the four doors were corroding rapidly in less than two years. And the Suzuki Defence Motors did not repair it free of cost as they were supposed to.
Anyway, I got the four doors repaired by them by paying Rs. 11000 and they assured me that time they will use epoxy paint on the inner base. Invoice no. 10/03843, invoice date 31/08/2010.
The doors are again corroding rapidly. I visited the Suzuki Defence Motors Karachi four times for my grievance but no positive response. First time they took the photograph and said they will contact me. It was almost two weeks since my first visit and still no answer from them.
The supervisor and work manager think I am a joker that every time I visited, they told the same--that they will contact me after consulting the high-ups.
Furthermore, please note that the repair work was not done honestly and with responsibility as I noticed when I had to open the door for power window repair, some welding particles accumulated from repairs and are still inside and the paint work was done without having it cleaned perfectly. When I bought this car to the same Suzuki Defence Motors, I also paid extra to have the underside of the car bottom plate painted as it was advised by them. Now tell me, who cares more for perfection?
The bottom line is, Suzuki Motors have poor quality work and service.
Reviewed July 13, 2011
I have a Suzuki Cultus car SF410 VXR CNG (with engine number PKF552327 and chassis number SF410PK459203), which was purchased from Pak Suzuki Motors Company, Karachi through Canteen Stores Department (CSD), Rawalpindi Cantt on 27.04.2011. Its first inspection was carried out by Suzuki Lyallpur Motors, Faisalabad and they stated that the engine head and timing belt, as well as the other parts of the new brand Cultus car are not genuine, and that these are already opened and also without screw. Sir, it is very strange that a new brand car has no genuine parts. However, when the car was unloaded on CSD, Rawalpindi, the very next day, I have received the car; and I have not taken the car on any workshop.
So, the replacement of new parts is not what I would have imagined, whether this happened during assembling of the car or otherwise. I have lodged a written complaint before CSD, Rawalpindi and also requested the Suzuki company, Japan for the replacement of the head engine and timing belt, and other repairable parts (and also requested that the matter be taken seriously); and replace old parts with genuine parts and a sealed engine. Sir, I am much tensed as I have paid an amount for a new brand car and have received second-hand car parts. So, please direct Pak Motor Company, Karachi to help and replace the sealed engine and other parts, as they cheated me with a defective car. An early response will be highly appreciated.
Reviewed July 12, 2011
I purchased a 2008 Suzuki Grand Vitara about 2 years ago. The car died to a battery issue the other day. I went to replace the battery and the terminal broke. I could not find one at a auto parts store. I called the dealer and was told that I had to replace the whole wiring harness at a cost of $960.00. That is a cost that is definately a design to rip off the consumer. I talked to the dealer and Suzuki USA and was told thats the way it is.
Reviewed May 31, 2011
I bought a 2011 suzuki kizashi 3 days ago and I am upset with the paint. It was a demo car with 4700 miles on it. As I was getting ready to get in it and leave I decided to do a final inspection and noticed paint chips all over the hood and front bumper, mirrors, and even some on the sides. The salesman tried to convince me that it was bugs. I purchased a demo car with a few miles but did not expect to have the paint chips already. After reading forums I have noticed it is a problem with the paint. The dealership promised to fix the chips and buff it out afterwards but I truly believe that it is just a temporary fix to a problem that suzuki is not wanting to admit to.... I am going to contact suzuki and I hope that everyone else with the same problem will do the same.......
Reviewed May 20, 2011
I bought a 2007 Suzuki Grand Vitara and 6 months later I returned due to the fact I had an alignment problem. During the purchase, they performed an alignment and 2 tires and list of other things. Well back to the return visit, they said it was not a covered item and I would have to pay. I took the car to another shop, had 4 tires and an alignment for almost 500.00 dollars. I filed a complaint with the attorney general office and they were only willing to replace two tires, but I had already paid for the replacement.
Needless to say the following year I yet again had to put an alignment and 2 tires again. There is something wrong with this car, it's now 2011 and again I have to have an alignment and tires again. I tried to file with the lemon law but they can't help me because I paid out of my pocket. Please help me, this problem is just unsafe for my family and I can't afford to keep doing this every year and besides that I have never owned a car that you must put alignments on them every year.
Reviewed Nov. 28, 2010
I Pay 251 dollars every month just so I can hear a a rattling noise everyday every time I start the car. Before it was only in the morning, now it's all the time. I took it to the dealer 3 or four times, not sure, but I do know that they said it's normal for the car to have that rattling noise. I didn't buy the car like that nor do I abuse the car. I use it only for work and back, and some shopping here and there. I'm very angry with them. I'm paying for what? It sounds like **. I wish you can hear it .
Reviewed Oct. 20, 2010
I paid off my account in full 2 months early. After paying the account off in full, they sent my account to collections. It’s been 2 years I’ve been fighting with these losers for my title. They will not talk to me about my account on phone and will not answer mailed letters.
Reviewed Aug. 31, 2010
My 08 xl7 has less than 39k miles. I when to open the driver's side rear door & the door handle came off in my hand. I could not believe this happen; car door handles are supposed to crush at the junk yard when they are recycled. I called Shortline Suzuki 7 was told to bring the SUV in & they would take a look at it. Got there, they looked & said they would call me back. Shortline called the next morning & said it was out of warranty & could offer no good will. I called Suzuki of America & they told me that the regional tech manager would be notified to take a look at it. About a week later no response. I called Shortline & they said it was declined by reg. tech. manager. I called Suzuki of America & they said the tech manager declined to repair the handle because it was out of warranty. Most people that I talked to agreed that this should have happened.
Reviewed Aug. 15, 2010
In the beginning, I would like to introduce myself to you, the owners of Messers Suzuki Japan. When I wanted to obtain a vehicle, the first thing that came in mind is a safe, stable, and a worldwide known brand in car motors. This brought me to a Japan production. From this point, I had limited choices, from which I have chosen Suzuki as it is a very well known brand for cars. Also, I know that Japanese total quality management module (Kaizen Module) focuses on customer satisfaction.
I have bought a Suzuki model ‘Marotti’, chassis no. **, man. year 2000, engine no. **. It was great with me and a satisfaction for my needs. Normally after a time of usage, I have faced some minor problems like white smoke coming out of the exhaust pipe of the car. In order to fix this problem, I refused to have my car checked by a normal mechanic. I chose a professional place which was your agency in Egypt (Modern Motor), "El Haykestep Services Station, on 3-8-2010 to test my car for maintenance.
From here my problem situation with your agency started as follows: First, they refused to check the car unless we should pay EGP 500 (USD 100). And this amount is non refundable in case I did not accept to complete the maintenance procedures. And if I completed the maintenance at their end, this amount would be deducted from the total fees. After 3 to 4 days, there was no response from their end. We called and asked about the car situation. The response was there were two choices.
First, the engine needs a full maintenance that will cost EGP 14000 (approx. USD 2500-3000). Or, the 2nd choice was to replace the engine by a used one costing EGP 5700 (approx. USD 1200). We didn't accept these choices. And we requested to reconnect the engine as it was without any fixing, also losing the non refundable fees (EGP 500 - USD 100). They refused, firmly claiming that while checking the engine, they broke some pieces and it is impossible to return it back as it was. And it is a must for me to choose between their two choices, either fixing the full engine or changing it totally.
As you can see from the above, this is a forbidden action to be taken from an agency of a multi-international worldwide known company. They are putting their clients between one of the two choices and refusing my request, which is totally my right as they have told from the first beginning. Finally, as a client, I am totally unsatisfied from your situation. I regret choosing Suzuki and not choosing Toyota or Mitsubishi from the first beginning, an action that would save me from all this hassle and my financial loss. I’m hoping that the above written statement would be clear to you. I’m waiting for your quick response to meet the satisfaction of one of your clients.
Reviewed July 25, 2010
I have had my Suzuki xl7 for 5 years. I should have it paid in August. The car only has 77,000 miles and the motor just blew up on it. They cannot rebuild it. Although I have receipts where the oil was changed regularly, the Suzuki manufacturer will not honor my warranty that I bought extra when I purchased the car. I pay an additional 50 to 60 dollars a month for this warranty but they will not honor the warranty. They say that I have to pay them $8,100 for a new motor for my truck.
Reviewed June 12, 2010
When I collected my vehicle on 25th at the time of taking my vehicle, I asked them about the standard-ness of the vehicle. Mr. Sham (service manager, Saboo Motors) told me that vehicle is very perfect. From now onwards, you won't get any problem in the future. After I checked it was okay at the time of receiving, next day I checked the break. I am again skidding on the main road. There is no road grip for the break. I called him twice. His reply was "I am on the vehicle. I will call you later". Even I waited for 2 days. Again, I called to him. Again, his reply was "I am on ride. I will call you later". This reply is what I'm getting from the Saboo motors service manager. If this is the sort of the manager, then how can a common man can take vehicles from this type of showroom? If they got any problem, then who is responsible if we got any problem with our vehicle in the future?
After receiving my vehicle, I called him the next day. I asked for the break. He told break is okay as per our inspection. Even I went to another Hero Honda showroom and I test drive the Hero Honda extreme. The break was very nice, even I checked my friend extreme vehicle. Also, it was very fine break. Why mine is like this? Even I don't have any interest for taking Hero Honda vehicle also, but I want only Suzuki vehicle.
I like only Suzuki vehicle. Actually, I thought to take Zeus 125CC vehicle but I preferred GS150R for better performance. In any situation, for emergency purposes, we need the break first. Today, I found in my vehicle battery water is leaking and falling on the metal of the body on the left side of the vehicle. I want proper mileage in my vehicle. Immediately, I requested to the authorities to take necessary action on the Saboo motors as well as Suzuki company Pvt Ltd. Also, I want action immediately.
I requested the press to publish this matter immediately in the newspapers so that all customers can understand the Saboo motors cheating in the Hyderabad. I have complained about my vehicle. I got a call from Saboo motors Secunderabad and they told me to bring my vehicle to their service center on 21st. I have given my vehicle to them on the same day and I returned back later on.
I collected my vehicle on 25th in the same month and later on, I checked the break. It was very excellent for one day. Again, it is skidding and when I've taken my vehicle, they told me to test mileage and the test is with 100ml petrol. I drove with 70 speed. I got 3.5 mileage exactly and later on, the technician drove with 100ml petrol with the speed of 50. He got 4.9 overall. I got mileage for 1 liter 35 and he got 49. This is the vehicle status. I questioned them about the same matter. They told that if you go with the minimum speed, then only you will get proper mileage. Otherwise, you will get only 30. I questioned them.
My brother's vehicle, if I go with 100 speed, it is giving 47 to 50 mileage. In 50 to 60 speed, he is getting 55 exactly. Later, I tested for 3 times. The first time, I got 50 millage. Second time, 42 mileage, 3rd time 46 millage. This mileage I got with the speed of 40 to 50 only. If I drive with 80 speed, I amgetting only 25-30 millage. So what to do about this? Actually, I thought Suzuki bike is very excellent. Even my parents told me to take Hero Honda, but I prefer Suzuki because of Japan's technology. I thought this vehicle is very excellent. After I've taken this vehicle, I am suffering a lot with this. With the Suzuki company people, when I am having any problem, if I send any mail to the company, nobody is responding. Even I sent 10 times, but no reply from them.
This is the Suzuki company. If they are like this, who will prefer this company vehicles in the future? If proper response is there, then it is okay. Otherwise, this company is a waste. I am getting reply from Consumer Daddy (consumer forum) about my vehicle problem. They always get in touch with me for my vehicle. They are helping me, but I took the vehicle with rupees of 74 thousand from Suzuki company. They are not responding at all. If this is a sort of company policy, then who can take further vehicles in the market? This matter is known by everyone in the society. All are aware of this. Suzuki company is cheating the customers, no one can take the vehicles. Already, it has very much goodwill. Now they are losing it. I request you to take necessary action immediately for my vehicle to be perfect.
Reviewed June 10, 2010
On 20/05/10, I bought, a Suzuki Access 125 from Natraj Bikes Auto Pvt.Ltd, located opposite Ajit Cinema, near telephone exchange, Old Delhi Gurgaon Road, Gurgaon-122001, Haryana. I am very disappointed, because of the service provided by your authorized dealer. I was using Enfield bikes for the past 10 years, and now purchased the best Suzuki bike of the year, keeping faith that Suzuki will give me the better experience than Enfield. At the time of purchase, the dealer committed that after submitting the required documents, the scooter registration, and other documents will be given to me in next two three days. All the documents, as desired by the distributor was submitted the same day, but after many false commitments and runaround for 20 days, the registration is not provided. Due to this I am unable to use this bike for past 20 days.
No reliable answers have been given by the dealer, and in fact, from the day of purchase of this vehicle, Mr. ** is absconding, and today, in the morning, I was informed that the documents are missing. On inquiring about the sales executive, I was informed that the person is on leave. That made an impression in my mind that the company is just focusing on the front end sale. After sales service or customer relations stand at the least. Last but not the least, the dealer does not even have a printer to provide a computerized bills/invoice.
They told me that the bills will be manual, and once the computer and the printer starts working, they will provide me with a computerized bill, delivered to my residential address, which is yet not done. I have a strong feeling that this dealer is a fraud, and the company simply promotes these fraudulent dealers only. I purchased this bike to add some good movement in my life, but after paying 47,000 Rs in cash, it became the worst experience of my life.
Now, I am requesting to resolve the problem with the authorities, to take this product back, and refund the my money. I look forward to hear from you, and to a resolution of this problem. I will wait for within the next 48 hours, before arranging for the matter to be corrected by a third party at your cost, or seeking help from Consumer Forum Agency or the Better Business Bureau. Please contact me at the below mentioned address, or by phone. Please treat this matter with urgency, and may I request you to please issue a complaint number to me, for me to be able to use it for all my follow up calls.
Reviewed June 4, 2010
I have bought a Suzuki Swift Sport somewhere this year. But after one week, the car start having some noise from the dashboard. I have sent to Mofaz services center near Bandar Utama for a few times. They can't rectify where is the noise coming from and revert back to me that they have fix it. I'm so frustrated about this and I keep sending the car for repair at four times to fix the noise. I even left my car there for one day for inspection but yet the problem still hasn't been fixed. I'm totally disappointed with their service. I'm choosing Suzuki Swift Sport because it is a CBU car and I thought it should give me less problem but now it seems not. I regret that I chose Suzuki.
Reviewed March 22, 2010
I was never advised to contact Suzuki Roadside assistance prior to, so they could dispatch a tow company for me since my vehicle is still under warranty.
I was advised by a worker at the Suzuki dealer in Prattville, Al to contact this tow company and now there is a balance that I cannot afford to pay. I am presently out of work and I had to pay one tow service already that I couldn't afford to pay. If I would have known, this issue could have been addressed properly. I contacted the claim department and was given no way to resolve this issue other than to pay the bill myself. No other options were given to me. If the vehicle is still under warranty, why couldn't Suzuki contact the tow company to take care of this balance.
I would appreciate some type of assistance and guidance on this matter. At this point, I have no way to resolve this issue as I do not have the funds to take care of this balance to the tow company. There is a balance of $85.00 and my vehicle is still with the dealer in Prattville, Al and I cannot pick up my vehicle without this balance being paid which means I am still without transportation.
Reviewed March 12, 2010
On several occasions funds have been sent to be applied for balance reduction, not payments. Sometimes they were applied correctly. Many times they were and I would have to call to have a change made. This last time I was unsuccessful. I tried calling two different times. The first time I was placed on hold to speak to someone higher up the chain and could not wait because I was at work. I tried calling from home and once again was placed on hold waiting to speak to a supervisor. After 10 minutes I gave up. I am going to refinance the balance with a local bank to end the hassle.
Reviewed Feb. 26, 2010
I put in for a cancellation of my extended warranty last 12/10/09. I faxed my request to Jennifer since I had spoken to her on the phone regarding the cancellation. After a couple of weeks, I called to check the status and left her a message. There was no return call. On January 11, I totaled my vehicle. I contacted the lender and warranty company directly only to find out that my warranty still had not been cancelled. So I faxed the request directly to the warranty company for cancellation. The warranty company had explained that the refund would go to the dealership to be sent to the creditor. What a process.
I contacted the dealership regarding the refund on 02/04, 02/05, 02/08, 02/17, 02/19, and 02/26. I also left messages but was told that I would receive a call back. I never got one. I was told that they were just sending in my cancellation to the warranty company last 02/17/10! I told the rep that the coverage had been cancelled already and I was awaiting the refund. I then gave the rep the amounts that were to be refunded! I was told that she would get a check out 02/22 or 02/23/10.
I called back on 02/26/10 and the rep had been terminated and no one could tell me what was going on. I had to leave a message for the owner, who I had left messages for before with no response and who has her own hours. Must be after the dealer closes because every time I call, she is not in! This is delaying the remaining balance to be paid on my total loss. Not to mention that the longer it takes, the more interest I am charged!
Reviewed Feb. 2, 2010
We borrowed my mother-in-law's 2002 Suzuki XL7 tonight to go get groceries and a few things, and twice in a matter of two hours the accelerator stuck. The first occasion was as we were attempting to pass another vehicle on a 4 lane highway, it had to be literally 'floored' to even get up the hill and around the slow moving truck, but then when I let off the accelerator it just kept on going. I was of course stunned and didn't understand what was happening right away, but quickly enough realized what had happened, the pedal seemed somehow stuck down the whole way, so I stomped on it pretty good and it left go, finally coming back to its normal idle position.
Then, not even an hour later, I was attempting to back out of a parking spot and somehow, without me pressing on the gas pedal at all (my foot was on the brake but it was not fully depressed, just enough to switch from park to reverse) between park and reverse, the engine 'revved' to around 3500 rpms, which I didn't notice until I actually got it into reverse and it took off over half-throttle. Luckily, because I had my foot on the brake already, I was able to stop it from going very far in the crowded Walmart parking lot.
It was at that time I looked at the gauge and realized that it was again revving up and even when I tapped the accelerator, it revved slightly more and then settled again, but only back down to about 3500 rpms, until I actually put it back in park. Then it idle down. I've never had this happen before in any vehicle, and given all the Toyota recalls fresh in my memory already. Needless to say, I was quite worried about the safety of me and my my family (we had my 1 year old son in the back, too), and actually a bit angry about it.
It is definitely a safety hazard, whether it's particular to this vehicle (which I doubt) or is indeed a more common problem with this particular type of vehicle, it is down-right dangerous and I fear for my families safety when driving this hazard. Also, I might add that it didn't seem to be stuck on the floor mat really, and the floor mat looks to be the original one that came with it from the dealer. Something needs to be done to fix this problem asap before somebody gets hurt or worse!
Reviewed Nov. 21, 2009
Reviewed Oct. 16, 2009
Reviewed Oct. 1, 2009
Reviewed Aug. 22, 2009
My son owned a 2006 Suzuki GSX-R 600 motorcycle. On 07-22-2009, he had an accident. The frame welds broke off and killed my son. He was only 22 years old. I need someone to help me, so this never happens to anyone else. Suzuki had a recall this year on the GSX-R 1000. The frames were breaking. Thank you very much.
Reviewed Aug. 22, 2009
I am writing this on behalf of my sick father. He is currently undergoing chemotherapy and radiation for lung cancer and has a defibrillator for his heart. My father purchased a Suzuki from Suzuki 112, in Medford, Long Island on July 20. He put money down and financed the rest. Upon receiving the car and reviewing the paperwork with the rest of the family, we all realized that his car, which should have cost approximately $17,000, ended up being over $24,000 and that doesn't even include the interest from his financing (The grand total after 72 months of interest payments would be over $26,000.). We saw in the paperwork that the dealership had charged him $2000 for an extended warranty (without his knowledge and permission).
After further review at a meeting on August 7 with the manager, Ron, we discovered that the dealer had also charged my father an additional $3000 for a supplemental insurance coverage policy. We told the dealer that this was never discussed at the final signing (My father had no paperwork for any of this.) and Ron hesitantly agreed to give the money back. But at the 30-day threshold, the insurance company told us that they hadn't received anything from the dealer. He never submitted the necessary paperwork to the insurance company to cancel the policy.
We called him over a dozen times, and he never answered any of our calls. Finally today, August 21, we went into Suzuki 112 to confront Ron and find out whether he had any intention of returning my father's money. He said that he would not cancel the insurance policy and that if he were taken to court, he would win. He claimed that he would return the $2000 for the extended warranty within two weeks, but he said the same thing two weeks ago.
I believe that none of the paperwork for the refund of the extended warranty has been submitted, because after calling the company, Warrentech, they claimed to have not received anything from the dealership. As far as the supplemental insurance is concerned, we aren't even clear whether the dealership has submitted the necessary paperwork to provide my father with an actual policy. Given the unwillingness of Ron to provide us with any information, we are attempting to independently verify these two points.
We have contacted Suzuki North America, and they said that it's a "dealer" issue and that there was nothing they could do. I just want my dad's money recovered, so that he can get on with recovering his health. We fear that all this stress may be detrimental to him. Please, if there is anything you can help us with, we'd be so grateful.
Reviewed July 27, 2009
I bought Suzuki bike two months ago, a "brand new" GSR600A and when I went to the dealer for services, they told me there are some internal engine parts that need to be changed. I am not very happy with that. I need a replacement for my bike. Please contact me for details.
Reviewed July 14, 2009
I purchased a 2006 Suzuki Forenza from the dealer and within a month of the purchase, the car experienced problems where the engine light kept coming on. Since then, I have moved to Tennessee where I have taken the car to 2 dealers to fix the problem more than 3 times, which is the maximum to claim the car as being a lemon. It was never fixed, so I filed some papers with Suzuki before the car reached 30k miles to see if I could get another car or my money back. They denied me the request saying that I did not give the dealer a chance to fix it even though I provided paperwork proving that I gave the dealer more than 3 chances to fix the problem. Now, the car is experiencing further problems and the engine light is on again. Please help.
Reviewed June 30, 2009
I brought a 2008 Suzuki Forenza from them brand new. After having the car for 8 months and paying a loan of 370.28 dollars a month, which I still have another 5 years to pay, my check engine light came on. After already bringing the car in, they said it was a switch, which they replaced. But now, the engine light is back on and the car won’t pick up and won’t go over 80 mph. It’s an inconvenience to bring it in again for them to tell me they cannot do anything. Again, when I bring the car in, they will just replace the switch, which is obviously not the problem. I have had the car for 8 months.
Reviewed June 11, 2009
Car engine overheated and seized, despite being a new car with only 32,000ks on it, after towing it to their service center, I was told it happened because it had a faulty thermostat (which is a manufacturing defect) after refusing to fix it under warranty; I had to take them to court to get them to do it. They fixed it, but they did not put a new short engine in as agreed, but just reconditioned mine instead without even telling me. Now, we have to go back to court, because not only did they do this, but they want me to pay for the labor costs too!
Considering, I have been paying for the cost of a hire car for the entire 6 months that it has taken to get this far for them to try and get out of it. I don't think I should owe them a cent. Be warned that I am only 1 of many thousands of customers whose warranties have not been honored! The damage for me is money, approximately $5,000 in car hire and undue stress, I'm 20 weeks pregnant for heaven's sake.
Reviewed June 10, 2009
Suzuki Motors Corporation Japan, I have bought a Suzuki xl-7 from an agent in Muscat Moosa Abdulrahman Hassan 4 years ago (in 2005). After 3 months from the date of purchasing, the car started having two problems: breaks and remote control for opening doors. Till now, the same problems continue without finding any solution. The agent keep promising me, but there's no hope. Lately, I discovered whenever sending the car for break (drums which makes very high sound) problem repairs, the agent sprays the break drums with WD40 to let the sound of breaks drum stop for few days, which is wrong and might cause an accident. This practice every month almost happening,
Two years ago, one of your technicians visited Oman and came with the agent's technician to my house in the same car, and they took it for repairs. He has agreed also that it is a manufacturer's defect, and he promised when he is going back to Japan, he will solve this problem and find solution for it. The agent kept agreeing and telling this is a manufacturing defect in this type of cars.
You know very well if this has happened in Japan or United States, you would already withdraw all cars from the market. I waited a lot, and this car must be changed or found solution for me. I am going to blame you and the agent, especially if I get involved in a bad accident due to breaks and what the agent is doing, as I believe you don't want an international manufacturer to lose name and reputation. So I'm requesting you take necessary action accordingly and immediately.
Reviewed June 3, 2009
My car has been in the repair shop for over a month due to incompetence. In March 2009, my car had to have the head replaced. It was under warranty and when they did the work, they did not pull the engine nor did they change the oil or filter as was the procedure. They claimed that they didn't have to do that.
Well, one month later, I broke down and had to have the car towed back to Suzuki 112. It has been there ever since, first waiting for approval for a new engine, and now waiting for more repair work. It seems that they can't even install the new engine properly, had to work on the lifters, then the tensioners, and still waiting for more parts. They do not call with any information, but just keep telling me it will be ready this day, then the next day, etc.
Reviewed May 21, 2009
Reviewed April 22, 2009
This was while riding on Interstate 75 on Sept. 30 after several attempts of taking a 2006 GSXR Suzuki 1000 to the dealership complaining about the front end shaking. They kept it both times to check out the problem but both times they failed to repair the problems. So, one night while out riding, the bike started to shake and eventually flipped and wrecked, putting me in ICU for a night, four days in the hospital. I couldn't walk for three months. I lost my state job as an officer and had to have a nurse come to my house for two hours everyday for three months to change my bandages. I eventually learned to walk again but I never returned to work. I am applying for disability as we speak because of my accident.
Reviewed April 7, 2009
I contacted Suzuki because my 6-year old daughter got tangled in her seat belt trying to get out. The seat belt retracted and squeezed her belly to about 3 inches wide. It was a scary sight. The seat belt locked and there was no way to get her out except to cut her free. Luckily, I was at my house so I could quickly get some scissors to free her. I contacted Suzuki to let them know about the safety hazard and requested that they replace my seat belt. They completely blew it off and would do nothing about it. I even sent a picture to show how severe it was. They said my daughter was wearing her seat belt incorrectly, as if they were there. I was there and she was wearing it correctly. There is no reason this should have happened to my young daughter and their 'I don't care' attitude was just disgusting. I'm ready to sell my car now and never buy Suzuki again. I have pics if needed.
Reviewed March 5, 2009
Reviewed March 4, 2009
Reviewed Jan. 30, 2009
Reviewed Jan. 10, 2009
Reviewed Jan. 2, 2009
I bought a Suzuki Forenza and I am so afraid that when I pull into traffic, it does not have the power to not be hit by another vehicle. The car has been in the shop 2-3 times for transmission. It is a 2007.
Reviewed Dec. 29, 2008
Reviewed Dec. 22, 2008
Reviewed Dec. 16, 2008
Reviewed Dec. 3, 2008
Reviewed Dec. 3, 2008
Reviewed Dec. 1, 2008
Reviewed Oct. 10, 2008
I was riding my Suzuki SV 650 home and we had stopped at a stop light. When the light turned green I slowly accelerated into a left turn. The bike began going faster and faster even as I let off of the gas, pulled in the clutch, and applied the break. The bike was going too fast to make the turn sharp enough so I had to lay the bike down in order not to hit another vehicle. An onlooker said that he had heard of three other cases involving Suzuki motorcycles having their throttle get stuck within the last year and I thought this was a good reason to look further into this.
Reviewed Sept. 7, 2008
I bought a new 2007 Suzuki GZ 250 in Griffin, Georgia on June 20, 2008. I was looking at a bike for recreation and to save on gas. They had a 2007 GZ 250 that was new so I paid $3770 in cash (bike was $2999.00 plus taxes, cost for tag, prep cost, helmet, etc.). The bike was delivered to me the next day. It immediately had a problem when in 5th gear. It surges or jerks especially going up a hill or anytime it needs more power. It did this when it had 3 miles on it. I thought the problem was because it was new and since it was a 2007 and had sat for a long time. After 340 miles I took it back to Griffin on July 3rd. It sat there for days with no repair so I got aggravated and picked it up and took it to a dealer in Fayetteville, Georgia on July 12th. The service manager told me to drive it until it was time for it's 600 mile service. I took it back on July 19th and it has sat there since. I keep being told they are waiting on a part. It's getting close to 2 months waiting on my bike to be repaired. I contacted Suzuki's customer service center in California by mail with information as their site requests. After a week of not hearing from them I called them and spoke to a rep who was handling my case. That was two weeks ago now. It's September 7, 2008. I spoke with the owner of the business in Fayetteville last week. We're still waiting on a part.
Reviewed Sept. 4, 2008
My transmission for my 2006 9-3 Aero had a crack in the direct drum which it loss pressure and made the clutches fail and burn, I have a FACTORY coverage contract the the company websites says coverage of any operating mechanical or electrical failure essentially mimics the factory warranty but when I made a claim the company told me that my part was not coverned. Even though the parts I need are NOT on the excluded part of the contract, the repair shop and the dealer dispute the findings of the warranty company.
I had to pay for my own repairs
Reviewed Aug. 11, 2008
i bought a 2008 suzuki swift sport from my local dealer & i rescently cracked my passenger side mirror cover. the cover is a simple piece of plastic that covers the front of the mirror which you can easily unclip & replace. but suzuki force you to buy a full new mirror costing 70.00 [BPS] + extra to fit it!
i complained to the local dealer & suzuki.uk who say it is the suppliers who will not just replace the cover & thus you have to buy the whole mirror & then pay to have it replaced!
Reviewed Aug. 7, 2008
On 19th August 2007, I purchased a Pearl white colour Maruti Suzuki Grand vitara SUV (Reg No: MH-04 / DB-6725) car from the Fort POint Automotive Pvt. LTd, Mumbai. While taking the delivery of the car there were two problems. First the alignment of the car was not proper. The car used to steer automatically towards the left side when the steering wheel is left free. Secondly, there was lot of vibration and cabin noise in the car. As if some loose parts are there inside the cabin. I informed the dealer on that day itself. I was assured that the problem was minor and would be rectified soon.
On 21st August, the car was given for check up . But the problem was not solved and I was told that problem would be solved during the 1st free service after completion on 1000 kms. On 28th August, the car was given for first service. But even after keeping the car for 3 days the problem could not be rectified. On 17th September I gave a written complaint to Fort Point Automotive. On 24th September their works manager Mr. Keith D`souza called me saying they have to change some part relating to the suspension of the car and the parts would arrive in a weeks time .After that the car will be perfectly fine.
On 15th October the car was again serviced and kept for two days During this service they said that the noise was coming from the AC piping, and the same had to be insulated. But even after changing the parts the alignment problem, the cabin noise and vibration noise is still there. On 17th October again I gave them a written complaint and personally talked to the Managing Director Mr. Sundeep B., to which they replied saying they need 15-20 days time to come to a conclusive solution to the problem. On 19th October I got a written reply from them claiming there is 'some problem' in the car.
After repeated letters and communication with the opposing party, finally on 17th december 2007 I filed a case against the Fort point automotive pvt ltd (mahalaxmi) and Maruti Udyog Ltd. Till now the maruti udyog ltd has not given a written statement to the court and the case is being postponed to future dates. Is this the fate of consumers where a manufacturing defect is not being rectified by the company which boldly claims to give warranty against all defects? What is the value of a warranty then? please help if you can
Reviewed Aug. 5, 2008
Brought my suzuki forenza into the shop 4 times in the past 2 months - ended up spending over $900 for them to "fix" the car - same problems continue to happend - (engine light stays on, car runs HORRIBLE, has cut off on me several times while I am driving with my kids in the car- it's a lemon - AND I was told by them (after I spent my $900 - "it was a mystery to them what was wrong with the car...) the car only has 41,000 miles on it and it's an 05 - WOW. I want this problem fixed - I need HELP! keep getting the run around
Reviewed Aug. 4, 2008
2-9-08 Wiley heard noise and he said that he was a part-time mechanic and that it was just the brakes, "Oh, that can be fixed. We are going to take care of you. I am a honest person and I would never try to put you in a car that I knew something was wrong with it" Left the vehicle at Hammond Suzuki to get insurance. 2-11-08 Picked up the van and called Wiley on my way home to tell him that the vehicle was not driving correctly. "Maybe it's the tires, we put new tires and did a front end alignment." Asked him did he ask the service dept about sound, he said "they heard the noise but they said it was working itself out. It sounded a lot better than it did when they first got it"
2-13-08 Called Wiley about noise again, he said that was why I had the warranty, wait 30 days and then go to the dealership in Covington. His advice: If I was you I would just wait the 30 days, the guys there don't service vehicles like they should. 2-15-08 My dad asked what was the knocking sound, it was just that loud. 2-19-08 Called Wiley again, (it took me a while to get him on the phone, I had called several times). "Tracy, don't think that I am trying to hide from you." Odd! I told him about the door not locking and noise was getting worst and I was not driving it like that. His advice: Bring it in and we will take care of you. 2-20-08 Took it to my cousin and let my cousin listen to it and he said something was knocking up against something, he thought it was a pulley.
2-21-08 Told Wiley what my cousin said. Talked to Brian he looked at it for about 20-30 minutes (door). His advice: It would take a really long time to get in the door so since I lived in Covington and I have the warranty, just take it to the dealership there. They forced the warranty so I could take it to the dealership. 2-25-08 Took van to Rainbow in Covington, kept from 7:30 am- 2:30 p.m. hadn't looked at it. Picked up at 4:15 p.m. Kasey said nothing was wrong with it that was the way it was suppose to sound. Asked them about the pulley he said all Dodge caravans sound like that. Asked a friend of mine could she hear it (Yes).
2-25-08 Took van to Hammond Suzuki and General Manager (Bruce) took it for a test drive and then Brian and I went. I couldn't hear it. Brian asked for me to leave vehicle there. Solution: talk to a Dodge dealership to see if they could figure it out or ask my cousin to talk to him to tell what he heard. 2-26-08 Called to talk to salesman, he (Wiley) answered and said Wiley was not in. 2-27-08 I wrote a letter to Drive Financial to see what I could do to get out of this deal. Talked to finance and she told me that the dealership could let me out of the deal because I was having so much trouble with this vehicle.
2-28-08 From my understanding Drive Financial called Hammond Suzuki to see what the problem was. The dealership was not willing to let me out of this deal and I was refusing to leave. Talked to the finance company and they made suggestions but Bruce would not budge. After hours of me sitting in the dealership Bruce finally agreed that he would see what I as talking about. He agreed he did hear something and agreed to fix the vehicle. He would pay the deductible as long as I would bring the vehicle there and he would put me in a rental. 3-4-08
Agreed to these arrangements and dropped vehicle off and Hammond Suzuki put me in a rental until 3-7-08. Told them (Brian and Bruce) about the noise under the hood, the door not locking and the vibration in my foot when I accelerate. 3-7-08 Assessment: Brian said that it was a tensioner pulley and that was the noise and on the same day I asked him about the vibration in my foot again. He suggested that I needed a front-end alignment. Supposedly a front-end alignment was done on 2-11-08.
3-22-08 Took my van to Tire Kingdom for 1.) Front-end alignment 2.) Rotation of all tires and balanced. The shop attendant said that this was a problem with my rack and pinion and I should take it to get checked because it was making too much noise with so little miles. 3-24-08
Called and talked to Brian in the Service Dept--told him about what the shop told me when I went to get a front end alignment 3-22-08. Shop stated that I should get the rack and pinion checked because it was too loud with those little miles on the vehicle. Brian didn't have anyone to look at my van (his mechanic was in Atlanta) and he told me to bring it in 3-31-08. 3-25-08 I called Brian back and he said he talked to Bruce which said if I got a rental he could not justify why I've had the rental for so long.
3-31-08 Took vehicle to Hammond Suzuki and waited: addressed concerns. Concerns: 1.) Rack and pinion- tire rods. There is a cracking sound underneath the car when I go over holes. The van is pulling to the right really bad and when I make a turn the sterring wheel is loose in my hand. 2.) Vibration in tires/brakes: Addressed this 3-4-08 and 3-7-08 when I picked car up.(Brian said it may need a front end alignment. Wiley told me on 2-11-08 one was done). 3.) Blinkers: When I turn the right blinker on the left one comes on like I have the hazard blinkers on.
Assessment: Brian said his technician couldn't find anything wrong with the way it drove and that it was the way the van drove on the road, there was nothing wrong with the tires or the rack and pinion. As far as the sound, he said that it was the air compressor so he would order one and I could bring the vehicle back.
4-1-2008 Called Brian and told him to also check the surging in the engine when he had the vehicle. 4-16-08 After several calls Brian finally told me that he had to send the compressor back and get a new one and it should be in, in 2 weeks and he would call me. 4-22-08- 4-24-08 (Can't remember which day) Called Brian again and he was out and I talked to the other Parts manager and she said that she would give Brian the message to call me. 4-25-08 Brian called me back and scheduled to bring in vehicle 4-30-08. 4-30-08 Provided rental- Dropped vehicle off and I had to call back on 5-1-8 to see if vehicle was ready.
5-1-08 The work order states that I, the customer, states A/C will not blow cold air. I never mentioned anything about the A/C and since then this vehicle is just worst. 5-14-08 Still hearing the surging, which they never tried to fix, they just replaced a compressor that was working fine.The night of my daughter's graduation, it had just begin to rain and when I went to hit the brakes I went sliding across the road and almost hit a car. 5-15-08 Called Brian and told him that I was bringing the vehicle back in for him to look at it.
5-16-08 Didn't trust the brakes enough to drive to work, I asked my dad to look at the brakes because Brian told me nothing was wrong with the tires or tire rods or brakes. When he took the tire off the rotor had not been turned and the brake pins had been lost and brakes were put on wrong. Brake pads were being rubbed by the bad rotor.The brakes were not holding at all. 5-30-08 I was finally able to take the vehicle to Hammond and Jared in the Service Department told me that he thought it may have something to do with the transmission. Suggestion: take the vehicle to a dodge dealership which I would have to pay the 100.00 deductible because Hammond Suzuki is not equipped to do the transmission. Jared gave me the name of Aaron at Community Dodge and Larry at Rainbow in Covington. I did tell Brian about the brakes and he said he was sorry that his guys missed it.
6-2-2008 Sent the letter attached to Bruce/Sales Manager to see what can be done. June 2, 2008 "I am writing to you to see what are my options concerning a trade in. I know we did get off on the wrong foot concerning this 2006 Dodge Caravan but you have to understand the position I was in, Wiley and the service department just kept giving me the run around. I don't know if Brian has been keeping you informed but it just seems like every week I have to come to Hammond for some kind of problem and now they tell me it may be the transmission. So now I am going to have to pay the $100.00 deductible, which I really can't afford and then take it to another dealership to see whats going on with the transmission.
"Two weeks ago I lost control of the van because of that hard rain and flooding. When I got ready to stop at a red light the van started to pull to the right and I almost hit a state trooper and the ditch. I had brought it in to the dealership and they said everything was fine but when I had someone else look at it, they found that it was only 1 pin holding the brakes together and the rotor was grinding the brake down. I know I should have gotten the vehicle checked out from the beginning but that was my mistake and I failed to complete that process. I know that Brian has been trying to help me as much as possible but I have to keep using gas coming back and forth to Hammond and it is becoming a struggle. I know you said that you would take care of a rental but as much money as the Extended Warranty Department has had to put into this vehicle I may as well get rid of it now because I don't know what else may go out. I was trying to get a 2nd job so I know I won't have that time to come to Hammond if something else happens to it.
"My credit score is 627 and I am still working on getting it better, I have been consistent with my car payments. So I ask you out of the goodness of your heart, that you consider allowing me to trade this vehicle in on something else. I love the fact that I have the room but I need something dependable.I hope that we can come to some kind of compromise concerning this matter. Thanks for all your help."
6-4-08 A salesman called me to update information and asked if I had another down payment, the answer was no. 8-3-08 Still no response about a trade in because I don't have another high down payment.
Reviewed July 29, 2008
I bought a Suzuki Grand Vitara, 2006, and have had problems with a few things. I took the car to them 3x for the transmission delaying and then shifting hard when it finally decides to get into the right gear. They do what they call "computer update" which is short for 'we pretended to fix or look at your car'. There is never a change after the "computer update" because this does nothing. It reprograms nothing, does nothing! About a month ago I had to take it to Suzuki to find out why the a/c would switch from a/c to heat. They told me that they had ran everything they could on the car and even called corporate but no one could advise what the problem is.
Basically, gave me back my keys and my broken car. I took the car to a local mechanic the next day to have them tell me it's a accuator/blendor that is bad. They can install it for me but Suzuki gives these mechanics a hard time buying parts like this. Also, a clip got broken inside the driver's side back door panel. I asked them about that and they wanted $800+ to replace the panel. The same mechanic that told me what the ac/heat problem was told me that he could fix the clips if nothing more than glue the clips back on and would charge me $15-$20. Needless to say, if I could get someone to take the quickly depreciating piece of s I'd be glad to trade...
Not happy. Oh and my husband bought a Suzuki Forenza 2006, new two years ago and his transmission went out last month. He took it to them, still under warranty and they wouldn't make that good. Told him that it was a transmission sensor, an "external component" of the transmission and therefore not covered under their warranty they want everyone to believe it so great! Worthless Warranty!! He had to pay over $200 to fix it.
Reviewed July 17, 2008
I purchased a extend warrenty with my new vehicle from them back in may 2008 now that my husband came from leave from afghanistan he told me it wasnt needed, so we wanted to cancel it, we called for 2 days and no answer from anyone so my husband went down there to talk to the GM who is the only person supposely that can authorize the cancellations, he told us that he can cancel it and that it was be like $25-$75 that was june 5 its been well over a month and no cancellation ive called repeatly and ive gone down to the dealership its very hard and stressful enough i had my baby may 19 and my husband went back to afghanistan. I got into repeated altercations with robert savage he told me that he would do it on his own time and its not up to me, The warrenty cost $5,386.81 i need that return to the principal balance so i can refinance the car for a lower APR and i cant unless he gives me the money back, i went there many times with my father demanding a cancellation form and now he changed the price he told me it would cost up to $2000 to cancel and on the contract it clearly states i can cancel anytime within the terms of contract all i have to do is 1. bring original contract which i have 2. fill out the cancellation form 3. pay $25 i have no issue with that but when i go down to the dealership they refuse to give me any paper work and i know thats illegal what they are doing to me, ive called the extend warrenty company PRizm and they inform me that when you buy the extended warrenty the bank gives prizm and the dealership a cut and i think the dealership cut was $2000 and they know that they would have to refund the money back to the bank and they dont want to give up, i would like to settlt this outside of court but nobody wants to even answer on my calls nor will anyone talk to me, i dont know what else to do or who else to turn to. I wrote and called channel 2,5,7,9 and i left several emails for help me howard no response i wrote a letter to the NY state attorney general and no response. This coming week i will be going to small claims court to fill out the paper work because i plan on suing them, i need some kind of mediation in this situation i know what they are doing to me is illegal and between school work a newborn and having my husband in afghanistan is stressful enough i just cant see how they can treat a soldiers family this way!
Reviewed July 7, 2008
I purchased a brand new lemon (Suzuki Verona) in late 2004, and my problems started at 3000 miles. The problem with my car is that the engine shuts down while I am driving. It has happened at least 10 times, two of which caused an accident for me and my son. They have performed numerous recalls, replaced the engine twice, and replaced my ingnition in March of 2008-- at my expense. I have tried to get them to take the car back, and they have refused, instead deciding to replace my engine twice, along with many other recalls the car has had. As of now, Suzuki is not selling Veronas anymore in Houston, so I have no way to trade it, and I would not feel right about endangering someone elses life by selling it to them. I am afraid that the next accident we have will be deadly, and I need your help. Please. I feel that they are taking advantage of a single mother. Attorneys do not want the case, because the accident was not major/ life threatening. But, if I am on the freeway the next time it happens, it certainly will be, and I am interested to know how many other Verona owners are having similar concerns with Suzuki. Please help me in any way that you can. We have lived in fear since owning the vehicle. Please help us, or point us in the direction to someone who can assist.
Reviewed July 5, 2008
I rode my Suzuki gz250 cycle to there shop on April 30, 2008 for oil change, brake inspection, and charging system checked. I had to leave them a $200 deposit (I wrote a personal check) before the would look at my bike. After a few weeks went by i was informed that my brakes were fine. The week of May 19th I received a call from them stated that they could not get my bike started and they wanted to know if it had a safety switch. I went to there shop and call them every two to three days after that and all they would tell me is they are working on it.
Finally on June 6th my wife called there shop to speak to Mr C. and was told that he was busy and to leave my name and number and she did so. About 30 minutes later she received a call from one of his staff wanted to know if they could help and what they problem was. I told them we are frustrated and wanted to know when the bike would be ready and that is when things took a turn for the worse. I rode my bike to them and somehow there was a problem and they couldn't get it started.
We had to take them $272 cash only on June 16th because they would not take a check and have it towed to another shop and pay them storage fees. As a result we were not able ride for five weeks. We spent more money on gas driving the car versus the cycle and the bike was not properly put back together when I had it towed.
Reviewed May 12, 2008
Purchased a2007 Suzuki 4/19/07. Have taken this vehicle back to the dealership three times for various repairs. 5/17/08 will be the fourth time,the dealership is 52 miles away so I have to take off work or go on a Saturday to get it there. The latest repair will be on the left rear hub assembly,it needs to be replaced. The left front had to be tightened previously. There are 23,000 miles on this vehicle and the rear tires are bald in the center of both rear tires. The front tires are cupped.
Obviously there ia an alignment problem in the front and rear because a whole set of tires should not be this worn at 23,0000miles. The dealership stated that I will have to pay for the alignment, my vehicle is still under warranty.And they have told me it is safe to drive my vehicle although it needs a left rear hub.having been a mechanic for 20 years in the Marine Corps I know this is not safe.
However they did not give me an alternative and I must drive to work. They do not care about my safety or about anyone else who might be hurt or killed if my left rear wheel flies off. I have spoken to the owner and all I have heard is we will try to work something out, that was aweek ago. This dealership is clearly unconcerned about service after the sale or customer safety.
Reviewed April 16, 2008
I purchased a 2004 Suzuki Verona on Jan,1,2007 and it is still covered under their seven year 100,000 mile waranty. I have had nothing but lies and stories told to me about this vehicle and how it is suppose to run. I have had it in the shop now six or seven times to have the engine repaired and the transmission repaired. They even said they replaced all the working parts in the top end of the motor and they replaced the short block, the whole lower end of the motor. But the engine still makes the same ticking and clanking noise in the top end and the rod bearing that was knocking is still knocking in the lower end of the engine. The last time I took it in I got the same story I got the first time I took it to a service department, they could not hear, feel, or see anything wrong. You need to be aware of the fact that over 10,432 people have filed complaints about their Suzuki Verona.
Reviewed March 10, 2008
I purchased a 2007 Suzuki SX4 and within 4000 miles of ownership the problems began. First the floor mat holder broke. Then the seat ripped and finally the catalytic converter went bad at 5000 miles. After getting the run around from the dealer who tied the vehicle up for weeks (total time) and didn't fix anything I had to get Suzuki involved. Even after that I ended up taking the vehicle to a different dealership to get problems resolved. Suzuki seemed to not be able to resolve the issue within a short amount of time. Furthermore the gas mileage stated on the window is no where near what they say.
Reviewed Feb. 12, 2008
We purchased a new car 2007 Suzuki Reno on July 10, 2007. Our car payment is 458.00 per month. We need a new car at that time because our other car was shot. We had just finished paying that car off. We were so appauled to find out that our actual car payment is $158.00 per month and the interest payment is $300.00 per month!! Is there anything that we can do about this?
Reviewed Dec. 13, 2006
The clutch on my 2003 Grand Vitara needed to be replaced after 30+ K miles. I have had many vehicles with manual transmissions and have never had any wear out anywhere close to as fast as this one did. Despite all the hoopla over their 7 year, 100,000 mile powertrain warranty and an indication that this was highly unusual Suzuki refused to stand behind their product.
I was out $850 for a vehicle whose 3 year warranty had not yet expired much less its vaunted 7 year warranty.
Reviewed Aug. 1, 2006
My Suzuki auto, purchased in 8/03 needs a repair of an alternator which should be covered by the manufacturer's 3 year/36,000mile warranty. Apparently when I purchased the car, this documentation was not submitted to Suzuki corporate therefore, they want me to pay $900.00 to have the car repaired. Also, I had to have the car towed and rented a car. Both of these should also be covered by the warranty that they do not see in their system.
I have faxed the documentation of the bill, the extended warranty (which they also claim does not show in their system) in order to prove that I am still under warranty but was told by Orlando (a customer svc. rep. who is rude) that it could take them days to look into this.
Reviewed July 21, 2006
Suzuki is aware of latent defects concerning timing chain cover seals that leak oil and will worsen over time which will impact the value of the car. It is documented that the leaks occur with Suzuki Grand Vitaras from 1999-2001. My Grand Vitara is one of those cars (year and VIN#) with the latent defect. I took it to an authorized Suzuki mechanic as required, but they never informed me that Suzuki was aware of the problem. After further research on my part did Suzuki Corporation acknowledge they knew of the latent defect. This is NOT a warrenty issue as Suzuki proclaims. This is a latent defect well documented and known to Suzuki Corporation.
The car was leaking oil impacting the resale value of the car. Over time, creating additional problems in the performance of the car.
Suzuki Company Information
- Company Name:
- Suzuki
- Website:
- www.suzuki.com
