CONSUMER NEWS    RECALLS    COMPLAINT FORM    SCAM ALERTS  


Complain about a product or service

Small Claims Guide | Class Actions | Lemon Law | FAQ | Resources | Newsletters | Spanish
Automotive    Education    Electronics    Family    Finance    Health    Homeowners    Shopping    Travel   
NEWS   Latest |  Archives |  Auto |  Cells, etc. |  Computers |  Financial |  Health |  Homeowners |  Parents |  Privacy |  Scams |  Seniors |  Travel

Think Twice Before Buying an Extended Warranty

Service contracts depend on the retailer's whims





By Mark Huffman
ConsumerAffairs.com

November 12, 2007 

Home Warranties Not Always What They Seem
Survey Finds Extended Car Warranties Often a Bad Deal
Car Warranty Scams Target Seniors
Think Twice Before Buying an Extended Warranty
Toys R Us Warranty Guaranteed to Disappoint
Extended Warranties a Waste of Money
Five Reasons to Just Say No
Wal-Mart Pushing Extended Warranties on Electronics
Computer Vendors Charge More For Less Service
---
More about Automotive Extended Warranties

Consumers continue to spend extra money on service contracts -- so-called “extended warranties” -- when they purchase a major appliance or piece of electronic equipment. But increasingly, consumers are frustrated when they try to use these insurance policies.

Complex terms can make the contracts difficult to enforce. And it also seems that many retailers who sell these contracts can just refuse to pay off. After all, they wrote the contract and know its loopholes intimately.

Case in point -- Ahron, of Lexington, Kentucky, tells ConsumerAffairs.com that he recently took his laptop computer to Best Buy for a repair under his three-year in-store warranty.

Cracked case

The computer casing had started to crack in three areas – a manufacturing defect that Ahron says was clearly covered under the warranty. The casing on his computer had never been opened and no liquid had ever been spilled on the keyboard, he says, conditions that would have voided any warranty.

“When I arrived at Best Buy I presented my problem to the technician. He told me this should definitely be covered but it would have to be shipped off for a couple of weeks for the casing to be repaired,” Ahron said.

In less than a week Ahron says he received a call from Best Buy, informing him that parts had previously been removed from his computer, meaning the casing had been opened and the warranty, therefore, was void. Ahron said he asked to speak to a supervisor.

“About an hour or more later I received a call back from the same technician, who told me he had spoken with a manager and that nothing could be done to help me because the liquid spilled on the keyboard had voided my in-store warranty,” Ahron recalled. “When I told the technician that nothing was mentioned about liquid before he denied ever telling me parts had been removed.”

Ahron said he believes the company simply didn’t want to pay for the repair to his computer and fabricated a reason not too. And he’s not alone.

A matter of time

Mark, of San Diego, said he opted for a four-year extended warranty when he purchased a plasma TV in April 2003. Because he was traveling extensively in his job with the Department of Defense, Mark arranged to have the TV delivered in September, five months later.

“The TV was delivered September 13, 2003 and the Best Buy installers attached it to my wall, hiding all the wires on Sept 17,” Mark told ConsumerAffairs.com. “The TV operated fine until Sept 4, 2007, when it suddenly went out. Although I thought I still had a few more days left on the extended warranty Best Buy informed me that the warranty had started 5 months before I received the TV.”

Mark took Best Buy to Small Claims Court and won. In the process, he made some interesting discoveries.

“I found out from Samsung that the TV was manufactured in Korea 17 days after Best Buy said the warranty started,” he said.

Interestingly, Samsung showed the date of purchase as September 13, 2003, the date Mark received the set. Samsung’s 24-month manufacturer's warranty began on that date.

“The judge ruled that I am entitled to costs of Best Buy’s repair service visit on Sept 12, 2007 for $100 and to have the TV fixed or replaced,” Mark said. “Best Buy personnel are the only people that I speak to that cannot understand why. Even the judge spent most of the time explaining it to them.”

Yet despite experiences like Ahron’s and Mark’s, a recent J.D. Power and Associates survey shows consumers continue to buy service contracts when they purchase major appliances.

Among owners of refrigerators, stoves, dishwashers and laundry appliances, approximately 25 percent report purchasing an extended warranty, while approximately 15 percent of microwave oven owners do so.

Think twice

“Extended warranties certainly provide a degree of peace of mind,” said Dale Haines, senior director of the real estate and construction industries practice at J.D. Power and Associates. “With some appliances -- particularly those with complex electronics and potentially high repair costs -- purchasing an extended warranty may make sense.

"However, major appliances tend to be very reliable, and consumers should consider very carefully -- depending upon their circumstances -- whether an extended warranty is worth the additional cost,” Haines said.

Perhaps one other factor should be considered as well.

Will the retailer selling the “extended warranty” actually honor it, or will it try to weasel out of its obligations, requiring the consumer to drag them into a courtroom to gain satisfaction?



Report Your Experience
If you've had a bad experience -- or a good one -- with a consumer product or service, we'd like to hear about it. All complaints are reviewed by class action attorneys and are considered for publication on our site. Knowledge is power! Help spread the word. File your consumer report now.


Consumer News

May 10 2008

Recent Recalls & Safety Alerts

READER SERVICES

Print, Email & More

Subscribe

Free consumer newsletters
Sign up now!





More consumer videos ...



Back to the top |

Advertisement


Home | Rogues Gallery | Good Guys | Complaint Form | News | Recalls | Search | Video | FAQ |
Consumer Resources | Small Claims Guide | Lemon Law | Newsletter | Contact Us
Advertise With Us | Testimonials | Newsroom | RSS Feeds | Radio | Job Postings




Terms of Use Your use of this site constitutes acceptance of the Terms of Use

Advertisements on this site are placed and controlled by outside advertising networks. ConsumerAffairs.com does not evaluate or endorse the products and services advertised. See the FAQ for more information.

Company Response Welcome If complaints about your company appear on our site, we welcome your response. Please see the Response Form for more information.

For more information, see the FAQ and privacy policy. The information on this Web site is general in nature and is not intended as a substitute for competent legal advice.  ConsumerAffairs.com Inc. makes no representation as to the accuracy of the information herein provided and assumes no liability for any damages or loss arising from the use thereof. 

Copyright © 2003-2008 ConsumerAffairs.com Inc.  All Rights Reserved.