UnitedHealthCare Reviews

4,880,395reviews on ConsumerAffairs are verified
  • We require contact information to ensure our reviewers are real.
  • Our moderators read all reviews to verify quality and helpfulness.
  • We use intelligent software that helps us maintain the integrity of reviews.

About UnitedHealthCare

Pros
  • Helpful customer service
  • Quick claims processing
  • Comprehensive coverage options
  • Affordable premiums
Cons
  • High out-of-pocket costs
  • Frequent claim denials

UnitedHealthCare Reviews

Filter by Rating

  • (128)
  • (57)
  • (63)
  • (122)
  • (2,617)

Popular Mentions

    How do I know I can trust these reviews about UnitedHealthCare?
    • 4,880,395 reviews on ConsumerAffairs are verified.
    • We require contact information to ensure our reviewers are real.
    • We use intelligent software that helps us maintain the integrity of reviews.
    • Our moderators read all reviews to verify quality and helpfulness.
    Recent
    • Recent
    • Oldest
    • Most helpful

    A link has directed you to this review. Its location on this page may change next time you visit.

    How do I know I can trust these reviews about UnitedHealthCare?
    • 4,880,395 reviews on ConsumerAffairs are verified.
    • We require contact information to ensure our reviewers are real.
    • We use intelligent software that helps us maintain the integrity of reviews.
    • Our moderators read all reviews to verify quality and helpfulness.
    Page 18 Reviews 3040 - 3240

    Reviewed Sept. 15, 2009

    United Healthcare, my company's health insurance provider, is denying medication to my husband with Crohn's disease.
    On 8/18/2009, Alan, my husband, was prescribed Cimzia, a drug used to treat active Crohn's. United Healthcare requires a pre-authorization in order to cover Cimzia. The first pre-auth was denied because the doctor's office, stated that Alan needed the drug for his Crohn's disease. UHC required that they state that it is ACTIVE Crohn's disease. After correcting this oversight and resubmitting the pre-auth. we received a letter from UHC stating that the drug had been approved. The File ID # is 11636220. However, when we tried to have it filled the pharmacy said it was denied because although it was "approved for quantity, it was not approved for distribution." When I called UHC I was routed through their maze of automatic phone systems until I was told the drug was approved and summarily disconnected. However, when I contacted the pharmacy they still could not fill the prescription. It is now 9/15/2009 and I still cannot get an authorization from UHC. In the meantime, my husband is suffering from active crohn's, cannot eat without severe pain, and is rapidly losing weight. I have called UHC and spoken to Dina, Rebecca, Karen, Madelaine, Mike, Rena, Mandy, Christy, Todd, Maria, and Manny. Manny now claims that UHC never received the additional authorization information they needed from my doctor's office. Manny would not transfer me to his supervisor. It has been almost a month, I've spent countless hours on the phone and talked to 13 people to date, trying to get this taken care of. Our doctor's nurse has called countless times, and we still cannot get the medication that Alan so desperately needs. Please help us get this straightened out.
    Thanks for your vote!

    Reviewed Sept. 8, 2009

    Claims not processing at UHC.Not getting reply from UHC.I was admitted in hospital(undwer UHC nw) n Bangalore.The hospital name is CMH hospital.We were asked to pay 5000Rs to the hospital.The claim request was sent to UHC by hospital.But the hospital didn't recieve ther claim amount.So when e contacted UHC they are giving each another number and not picking the call.Not even telling why the cliam is not processed for more than 2.5 moths.Hospital telling that they have submitted all the required docs.Where we have to go and ask? whom we need to complaint.
    Thanks for your vote!

    Reviewed Sept. 1, 2009

    United Health Care subsidiary company, Prescription Solutions Pharmacy, handles Specialty Medications for diseases. They mail medications that are mailed on "ice" within 24 hours. The only problem is you have to fit into their "mailing schedule". In other words, they will not mail your medicine for you to receive on Saturday. So if your medicine is on "ice" and you live in the southwest where the temperature averages 105 degrees or higher daily, then your medicine may be "tainted" by the extreme heat.

    Prescription Solutions doesn't care about your medicine, you, or the quality of your medicine. They are not accommodating and UHC Prescription Solution Pharmacy claims mailing overnight is expensive. Since United Health Care is a multimillion dollar company, I find this excuse to be highly unlikely. Further, Prescription Solutions provides a reminder call that is too early and therefore you cannot refill your medications due to needing a "prior authorization". The stupidity to this is that they don't even know their own rules. If you order your medicine too soon, the health care company denies it and requests a prior authorization. How can they not know a "no-brainer"?

    It is up to you, the patient, to advocate for yourself. United Health Care Prescription Solutions Pharmacy will not accommodate you, the "patient." It is all about them, their schedule and their cost at their convenience.

    Thanks for your vote!

    Reviewed Aug. 19, 2009

    I have been with United Healthcare/Golden Rule for more than 25 years. Every year the rates increase whether I used it or not, $40-$50/year. This year, I received a letter explaining this year's increase and it is being raised $1200/year! The letter also states that this increase is for all insured customers and is not a result of my personal use of the policy. I want to hear from other Golden Rule clients to find out if this is true or not. My thinking is if we can band together and catch them in a lie, we may be able to get a class action lawsuit against them. I would hope my email address is listed so others may contact me and we can discuss these unbelievable rate increases. Please, anyone who has Golden Rule insurance, e-mail me and we can try to keep these folks honest. Thank you!

    Thanks for your vote!

    Reviewed June 17, 2009

    United Healthcare has repeatedly denied payment to Dr. ** for a surgical procedure performed on November 17, 2008. Attached you will find a copy of the FDA approval for marketing the Novasure Endometrial Ablation System. Novasure is an FDA/Department of Health and Human Services approved method for treating menorrhagia in pre-menopausal women. Beginning November 2006, I began to experience excessive menstrual bleeding. I had 3-5 day periods every two weeks. I regularly passed blood clots in excess of 30 mm, as large as a half dollar, experienced depressed sexual interest and mild hormone related depression. I was evaluated by Dr. ** in March 2007, a uterine ultrasound was performed, fibroid tumors and polyps were noted, and a D&C was performed in May 2007. Pre-surgical symptoms abated until approximately June 2008, when excessive and breakthrough bleeding began to reoccur. I began to bleed every 9-14 days, pass large blood clots and began to regularly experience a rush of bleeding where I would saturate tampons in minutes and experience dizziness and the urge to faint.

    I was re-evaluated by Dr. ** on 9/2008, a uterine ultrasound was performed, fibroid and polyp growths were noted. I was seen by Dr. ** on 10/9/2008, and options were discussed. Dr. ** expressed concern with the growths, as it had only been seventeen months since the previous D&C. A second DNC would be necessary to remove the invasive tissue and the Novasure Endometrial Ablation System was discussed. Novasure destroys the endometrial lining/vascular tissue, preventing the growth/attachment of invasive fibroid/polyp tissue. The D&C and Novasure Endometrial Ablation were performed on 11/19/2008. Post surgical results are positive. Bleeding is almost non-existent and I have experienced no complications or re-occurrence of pre-surgical symptoms.

    Health insurance exists to cover medical necessities such as this procedure. I pay insurance premiums to cover this surgery. I pay my insurance premiums to United Healthcare with the understanding and expectation that medically necessary procedures will be paid to my physicians. UHC paid the hospital expense for this procedure. UHC paid the anesthesiologist for this procedure. UHC has repeatedly denied paying the gynecologist for this procedure, yet I pay my premiums to cover her fee every single month. Cost to me of $4,400 and threat of credit issues for non-payment.

    Thanks for your vote!

    Reviewed May 30, 2009

    I have been a UHC consumer for several years now. I have Lupus and have been hospitalized several times in the past years. They have paid for NUMEROUS blooddraws, sometimes equalling over $2000. Even after all this, I have never been required to meet my deductible before services were paid.
    This past winter I decided I would like to have an IUD inserted. Having Lupus, I am not supposed to use any form of estrogen birth control. I also have a history of endometriosis and have always had abnormal bleeding issues. Both I and my physicians office contacted UHC prior to the insertion. We were BOTH told that the service was covered and not subject to my deductible. All I would be responsible for would be the office copay of $30. So why am I surprised that a few weeks after the procedure I was sent a bill for $511??? The amount of my deductible, plus $11 for whatever. I have argued with UHC for months. If there was even a chance it had been subject to my deductible I would not have had the service done. I cannot afford $500.
    Thanks for your vote!

    Reviewed May 26, 2009

    I had a PPO Health Insurance Plan with United HealthCare. I had some blood tests done at my doctor's office and sent to CMLAB, INC. I have received a letter from the Lab saying that the insurance company had denied payment for the test provided by them stating that this Lab is not on the United HealthCare network. I am not a Health Insurance expert, but for my understanding when you have a PPO type of insurance the facility providing the services don't have to be on the insurance company network. They should be liable to receive payment for the services they provided to me by United HealthCare.
    The letter from UnitedHealth Care says: " Routine exams and/or related services are not a covered expense under your group health plan unless the services were performed by a network provider. The letter goes on explaining the reason for non payment. If you need I can fax a copy of these letter. I would like to know who could you help me with this issue. I have paid a lot of premium to this company and feel outraged they are not paying for this bill. This Lab has done their job by providing me and my doctor with the results and I very much would like them to get paid, it's just fair.
    Thanks for your vote!

    Reviewed May 21, 2009

    THEY THEY WOULD PAY FOR JOHN OF GRACE HOMEHEALTH TO CLEAN AND RAP MY LEFT LEG. AND THEN THEY DID NOT PAY FOR IT.
    Thanks for your vote!

    Reviewed May 21, 2009

    We had a child patient that presented with over 80 warts on his fingers and arm. The physician removed them and really only billed United Healthcare for 24 of them. We were denied payment on all but 3 because "we removed more than the policy allows in any one day". We tried to explain to NUMEROUS departments and people and we even filed a request for review. They still say we should have brought the child in and painfully injected him EVERY time and only remove 3 warts at a time. That would mean this poor child would have to come in 28 different DAYS and be injected repeatedly EVERY VISIT. Explaining that these warts interfered with his tactile sensation, etc. and telling them that it would be highly unethical to do that.....United didn't care. So sad when those who have power over our health loose morals and ethics. The total bill was only for $1700.
    Thanks for your vote!

    Reviewed May 20, 2009

    I have lost my job and my health coverage. My husband's job has the above insurance. He has had three payment s 150.00 taken out of his check x's three. This started on May
    Thanks for your vote!

    Reviewed May 7, 2009

    Beginning in approx Oct/Nov 2008 every time I have a Dr.'s visit or have testing done, United Healthcare claims not to be my primary insurance thus denying my claims. They are and always have been my primary insurance carrier with my medicare as secondary. I pay approx 400.00 dollars per month for this coverage for the past 3 years. I am a disabled firefighter. The fire dept is supposed to pay my health insurance for life because I was injured in the line of duty but because while I was waiting for my social security disibility to take effect I was also diagnosed with another health condition in addition to my injury the fire dept is claiming that my disability is due to the addition of the secondary condition. Even though I recieved my full pention and social security paid me from the date I was disabled in the fire dept they still say it's not good enough. Anyway that's neither here nor there, my problem rests in the fact that United Healthcare regularly denies my claims now claiming they are not my primary resulting in hours of phone calls.
    Thanks for your vote!

    Reviewed April 3, 2009

    I have a flexible spending account. The IRS rules say I have to use this money by the end of the year. In January, I contributed about $189. I lost my job on January 30th. No notice - just goodbye. United Health Care will not let me submit any bills against my flexible spending account beyond January 30th. What a scam, and what a great revenue stream for the insurance companies given all the people losing jobs. Mine isn't much money but the cumulative effect is enormous. If I had known I was going to lose my job on the 30th, I would have gone out and bought aspirins ,etc. (I had to fly to DC to lose my job). This is an insane way to treat people and it is also stealing. There has to be some reasonable window of time to use what we have paid in. The irony here is that I still have United Health Care benefits and they are still being paid my premium.

    Thanks for your vote!

    Reviewed Feb. 25, 2009

    My wife developed a tumor which was discovered in September of 2008. I looked in the 2008 Participating Provider Directory that the insurance company sent me which indicated that the University of Michigan Health Systems was a participating provider. As an added precaution on September 29, 2008, prior to any medical treatment, I contacted the insurance company via its toll-free number and spoke with Jennie and asked for participating providers near my location. She gave me the same information as contained in the provider guide. It was not until yesterday, February 24, 2009, when I contacted the University of Michigan Health Systems about the bills I am receiving, that I found out that the information in the guide and given to me verbally by the representative were in error. I have been appealing the insurance companys refusal to pay, but I am now getting my appeals back and they have also been denied.
    Thanks for your vote!

    Reviewed Feb. 16, 2009

    I have had trouble with UHC before, but 2008 beat everything. UHC denied claims because they said my husband and I have other insurance. We do not and have not had for some years. UHC is secondary to our medicare. I had to call over and over and over again to try to get claims reprocessed. Here I am in February still working on claims from last August, September, October and November. I'm not surprised about the delay on December, but last year I was trying to get January paid for as late as August. This is shameful.
    Thanks for your vote!

    Reviewed Jan. 30, 2009

    The insurance company just know how o take our money, no customer service very rude, attention everyone please call you provider for everything you need has their approval on how much is the amount of dollars need to pay before visiting doctor office. This is ridicilous
    Thanks for your vote!

    Reviewed Jan. 22, 2009

    After countless written and telephone discussions regarding a surgery that I had on April 22, 2008, my healthcare company, Optimum Choice A UnitedHealthcare Company, refused to pay in full for a procedure to correct excessive menstrual bleeding a procedure that both my primary ob-gyn and the ob-gyn who did the surgery believe should be covered at 100% under my policy.
    In 2007, I experienced a miscarriage and since that miscarriage I had been suffering from excessive menstrual bleeding. Initially, I was told by my primary physician to expect a lot of bleeding, so I waited for it to get better. In November 2007, it had not improved at which time I went to see my primary care physician, Dr. Brantz complaining of excessive bleeding. He conducted a papsmear and did not find anything out of the ordinary. In 2008, the bleeding got worse. I had periods that lasted two weeks long and included several days where a super tampon and a super pad could not contain the bleeding for more than 30-45 minutes. I contacted Dr. Brantz by telephone in 2007. He suggested at that time that I go to an emergency room, but by the time I got his callback the bleeding had abated some and so instead I came into his office the next day to have it checked out, at which time he referred me to Dr. Rifka. Dr. Rifka saw me in December 2008 and determined that I needed a hysteroscopy to address the excessive bleeding and recommended that if I wanted to have children to also get a laproscopy. After many discussions with Optimum Choice I was told that the laproscopy would be covered at 50 percent under the infertility benefit and that the hysteroscopy, which I was finally told did not require pre-approval, would be covered at 100 percent when linked with the diagnosis related to excessive menstrual bleeding. With letters from Optimum Choice and an assurance by Dena Ryan, the Optimum Choice manager handling my case, we finally scheduled the surgery. On April 22, 2008 I had surgery for excess menstrual bleeding which included a hysteroscopy to remove polyps and a laproscopy to clear the area in case I wanted to have children in the future. In June 2008, I was told by Dena Ryan that Rifka submitted only one bill for both procedures, and because of this both procedures were inaccurately linked in the bill to the infertility diagnosis for the laproscopy. She said this was simply a billing error and could be rectified by Rifkas office submitting these bills separately with their respective medical diagnoses attached. Rifka tells me they submitted the separate bill multiple times, but these were not received by Optimum Choice. By this time, almost 6 months after the surgery, Dena Ryan left the department and I never heard back from anyone. In October-November 2008, I called and spoke with Stacy several times and finally with Amel Jalil who said my only recourse at this point was to submit a formal appeal. In December 2008, I contacted both Drs. Rifka and Brantz to collect medical records related to the appeal and on January 22, 2008, I called and spoke with Mary to let them know the appeal would be arriving shortly at which time I was informed that the last date that I could appeal was 180 days after the surgery, which had passed on October 22, 2008. I believe Optimum Choice is responsible for paying for the hysteroscopy at 100 percent.
    Thanks for your vote!

    Reviewed Dec. 2, 2008

    I took my child to the dentist on 07-16-07 because he had a lose tooth, when I talked to receptinist I asked her if they take my insurance and if will be in network, she made a phone call and verify if it was on network and we went in, while he was there they did a cleaning and some fillings I paid my fees and we got onother appt. for the rest of the treatment we went in there twice after the first appt. and everytime I paid fees that I was resp. for. Three months later I got a bill from the dental place stating that the ins. did not pay for the rest and that i need it to pay. I went to dental place and we call the ins. and it was some kind of miss understanding that it was out of network, we told them it was in nework and I think we even fax some paperwork and made some phone calls and they said it was fix. Two months later another bill came in with the same amount, I went to the dental place and they did not receive payment they only paid a portion, I call ins. several times and they said theres a check floading for the amount, I requested a sup. and and I talked to Gilbert Lopez and he said he will take of it that it was dental place error but he will fix it. Weeks later I got a call from ins. stating the same version there were I check floading I gave them dental office # and he said he will fix it. I got another bill couple days ago with late fees.
    Thanks for your vote!

    Reviewed Nov. 21, 2008

    I called to get a quote and I was given a quote for a comprehensive plan. What alarmed me was that because I have not been insured for more than 60 days I would not be covered for the first two weeks of an illness. I was appalled by this policy and she said this was a standard practice. Like I was being unreasonable.Then I thought I must be misunderstanding this and I asked her does this mean your company will not cover the cost incurred in the first two weeks but your company will cover the costs incurred after two week holding time. She said yes. This is crazy. When My stepdad found out he had a brain tumor, the hospital bills for the first two weeks would have bankrupted our family. A long history of paying on time and being responsible would have been gone in two weeks. What is the alternative, not having the care? If you are having to pay high premiums why should they have this policy, I know why.
    Thanks for your vote!

    Reviewed Nov. 17, 2008

    Two managers at my employer, a California division of United Health Group, Inc, concealed from me their actions of identity theft and distribution, plus medical identity fraud by giving fellow employees my personal identification information along with false information about my health status thought the guise of distributing a fraudulent workman's comp case document that they created without my knowledge, consent or signature and then “authorized�. I have no injuries, neither work related nor otherwise, and never reported a work related injury. My employer's actions of distributing the false Workman's comp claim within the workplace for any employee to see also made all the key component of my identity easily available to any employees for photocopying and easy removal from the building. In doing so and never informing me of their actions I have been put in financial risk and I believe defamed by the false statements about my health.
    Months passed before I had complete knowledge of their actions, at which time a witness fortunately disclosed her observations and direct knowledge of what transpired months earlier. Those details can be provided as needed in a subsequent contact.
    Thanks for your vote!

    Reviewed Aug. 13, 2008

    Originally, when I called 911 when my husband died, United Healthcare tried to bill me for the ambulance that tried to save his life. I was then given the wrong information by one of the reps that told me by law, I could be on cobra for three years. My husband's boss again informed me he only had to give me cobra for 1 1/2 years but would honor the misinformation and insure me for the three years. (Of course, I did pay for it but it was discounted.) Every time I needed to have something paid the rules changed.

    In August of 2007, I had a breast cancer scare. I was told I had to pay for a deductible of $3000; the remaining balance was about $1800. I paid the hospital this amount. It took months and so many phone calls to finally find this out. Each time I called, I was told they did not have record of my calling the month before, so I had to start all over.

    In November of 2007, I needed eye surgery on my right eye. Because I paid the deductible, again after months of calls and stalling medical people they finally paid. I had the same procedure on my left eye in December of 2007, which is still not paid. They paid for some but not all. I've been promised it would be taken care of on several occasions, to no avail. I finally spoke to Kelly on 6/2708 at approximately 10 AM. Kelly is a rapid processing associate, that called each medical vendor to tell him/her United Healthcare would pay. Kelly told me it was just a glitch in the computer system and they had been having problems. She said once I had the confirmation number, the company must pay. I explained to her that the stress of this was too much. I was in good credit rating and wanted to stay that way. She again assured me this would be my last phone call.

    Since then, I have received those bills again and in fact, one company has put me with a debt collector that is threatening me to ruin my credit. Why would this company pay for one eye and not the other for the complete and exact amounts? I didn't have another deductible, since both surgeries took place before the end of the year.

    The consequences of this incident is my stress level. I don't know what to do. Can anyone help, please?

    Thanks for your vote!

    Reviewed Aug. 6, 2008

    I supposed to start my treatment in the end of June, 2008. Dr. faxed prior authorization form to United Healthcare and waited when the insurance company responds. United Healthcare sent me a letter stating that they cannot approve treatment because they cant contact my doctor. I went with this letter to my doctor and she showed me 7 faxes sent in different dates trying to get prior authorization. On 07.30.08 I paid for my doctors time to get her FAX THIS FORM AGAIN with the sign Urgent! on it. I made sure that the fax went through. The representative from United Healthcare stated that the process will take about 48 hours.

    On Friday (48 hours later) I called them again and one representative stated that it will take up to 30 days. I AM SICK I NEED TREATMENT FOUR WEEKS AGO! When I insisted, the representative put me with the conflict resolution person, who after having me on hold for a while stated that I need to talk to pharmacy, he gave me a pharmacy number to get release of medications. Ive never heard of pharmacy giving anybody release of medications, but I called my doctors office and asked them to call pharmacy. They called me 10 min. later saying that the pharmacy needs PRIOR AUTORIZATION FORM FROM THE INSURANCE COMPANY.

    I know that Im caught in a vicious cycle of insurance company not wanting to authorize my treatment, and Im asking you to help me to expedite this process. The next week I will probably contact a lawyer to learn about my options, but what should I do now? Thanks. My health is deterioratng and I face disability IF I DON'T GET MY TREATMENT!

    Thanks for your vote!

    Reviewed July 22, 2008

    I am writing with complete disbelief at what I have learned today about my (lack of) coverage with PacifiCare. I am a member of the Signature Value HMO, covered through the Palo Alto Unified School District. Copies of this letter are being sent to PAUSD as well as our union reps.

    My husband is teaching at a university in Utah for the summer, and so we are living out of state for two months. Six days ago I fell and fractured my distal shaft (right 5th metatarsal). I was informed by a PacifiCare representative that I should go to an urgent care center. I was also told in the same phone call that if I needed to see a specialist thereafter, I should have my PCP in California approve the visit. I went to the urgent care center, had my foot x-rayed, and was told I should urgently see an orthopedic surgeon, for I may need orthopedic surgery. I was given the name of a good orthopedic surgeon, and checked online last night, happy to see that he was an approved doctor in PacifiCare's lists.

    However, today after I contacted my PCP for a referral, I was informed by the Palo Alto Medical Foundation that they could not offer a referral. So I contacted PacifiCare again. Now the story changed: I could not be seen by a specialist and would have to return to Palo Alto in order to have anything covered! Only urgent care and emergencies would be covered. Is not seeing an orthopedic surgeon, to ensure that I will not have permanent damage, urgent and even emergency?

    This is insane. I am now on crutches, struggling to get around to care for my 11 month old son and to ease the burden on my husband, who is teaching part-time, telecommuting full-time, and now doing most of the childcare and household duties for us. I am due to travel to Oregon in nine days to attend my grandmother's 100th birthday and to attend a family reunion celebrating my brother's return from a 2 year mission in the Dominican Republic. I have already been very concerned about traveling with my son just in a short flight to Oregon. Now I am being told by PacifiCare that I can only be treated if I fly back to California. I have many questions which I ask that you answer: Is PacifiCare ready to pay for this plane ticket? How will I drive myself once there, seeing as my right foot is in a gigantic boot? How will I travel with my son to a place where I do not have parents ready to pick me up? I can't leave my son with my husband, for his teaching schedule and telecommuting already makes for 60 hour weeks and time out of the house when he cannot watch David. Will I get treated if I pop into an emergency room in Utah and demand orthopedic surgery there? If so, then I understand better why our emergency rooms are overloaded with care that should be done elsewhere by those insured.

    I was told today by the PacifiCare representative with whom I spoke that these are the confines of an HMO. Ridiculous. I cannot believe an insurance company would offer such deceptively incomplete insurance. I cannot believe my school district would sign up for such a plan, either! I have not yet contacted an attorney but am on the brink of doing so. I have lost the ability to communicate with people who don't listen. I feel deceived and cheated. This shoddy coverage is wrongful and should be considered illegitimate. Please respond in detail to my questions. I need a way to be seen by an orthopedic surgeon here in Utah, immediately.

    Thanks for your vote!

    Reviewed July 16, 2008

    My son had outpatient eye surgey in January 2007. The claim was processed in March 2007. We owed 20% of the contracted price and paid that amount without incident. In June 2008, the claim was audited by United Healthcare & they found they had made an error in the original allowed amount of the surgery. The increased the allowed amount and sent additional payment to the hospital which in turn left us with an additional balance (because our 20% increased).

    We had the claim reviewed & even appealed the decision based on the grounds that 18 months after the surgery was an excessive amount of time to reprocess the claim and that the original error was not our responsibility to correct. We ultimately had to pay the additional amount in order to keep the bill from going to collections. The letter of response to our appeal basically said that the claim was processed according to our policy and there was nothing else to be done. Ethically, this is just ridiculous. After 18 months, if you made an error, I fail to see how I am at fault as a consumer.

    In my discussions with their customer service and claims representatives, I was informed that there was no time limit for reprocessing claims or reevaluating claims. In effect that makes the policy null and void because there is no security that a claim is truly processed and closed. For example, a person could have open heart surgery in 2005, the claim could be processed and the patient's responsibility paid. Then, in theory according to UHC's stated policy, in 2035, they could "discover" that the original claim was incorrectly processed and sudenly this person could be responsible for an additional amount of coinsurance (in an expensive surgery that could be hundredsa or thousands of dollars).

    In my situation, it was just very frustrating to know that they were only paying lip-service to my issue. They had no intention of understanding my issue. I KNOW I owe 20% of the charge. I paid 20% of the charge and I don't think 18 months later it is ethical to reevaluate the charge thereby making me responsible for an additional amount for a claim that I had already paid in good faith. Times are tight economically for everyone right now. I had to pay the additional amount on my credit card and will now be paying on it for years instead of being finished with this claim from JANUARY 2007. Emotionally, I just feel abused and powerless. I had no choice but to pay and no additional options within their organization to appeal to.

    Thanks for your vote!

    Reviewed May 28, 2008

    I have Cervical Dystonia, Dr. at USF Giving me Botox Injection from Last 2 years, when needed. On 5/27/08 Dr. Gave me Pricption for Botox Injection, I took it to Local CVS Pharmacy. United Healthcare Refuse to Pay. When I called they say I have to Send Appeal in writting. I didn't have any proof of refusal. I have neck pain. I took injection every three month to controll the pain. Now What about my pain. Who will suffer

    Thanks for your vote!
    Loading more reviews...

    UnitedHealthCare Company Information

    Company Name:
    UnitedHealthCare
    Website:
    www.uhc.com