NEWS    RECALLS    COMPLAINT FORM    SCAM ALERTS   RESOURCES  
Small Claims Guide   Class Actions   Lemon Laws   FAQ   Newsletters  
Share


Complain about a product or service

Automotive    Education    Employment    Electronics    Family    Finance    Health    Homeowners    Insurance    Pets    Shopping    Travel     Print This     Email This    



NEWS   Latest |  Archives |  Auto |  Cells, etc. |  Computers |  Financial |  Health |  Homeowners |  Parents |  Privacy |  Scams |  Seniors |  Travel

Radio Shack, AT&T Face Class Action Suit

$99 Acer notebook deal really was too good to be true, suit charges





By Jon Hood
ConsumerAffairs.com

March 3, 2009

Consumer Complaints
Radio Shack, AT&T Face Class Action Suit

Radio Shack and AT&T are facing a class action lawsuit alleging that they violated Oklahoma consumer protection laws by failing to adequately disclose limitations on a recent promotion.

In December, Radio Shack offered the Acer Aspire One notebook for just $99. Even with the prerequisite that customers sign up for two years of AT&T mobile broadband service – for about $60 a month – the deal still seemed too good to be true. As it turns out, it probably was.

Billie Parks brought suit against both companies in U.S. District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma, alleging that the terms and conditions of her laptop purchase failed to indicate that she would be charged exorbitant fees for exceeding a pre-set five gigabyte limit on the computer’s built-in wireless connection.

Parks was shocked when she received her first bill, which totaled more than $5,000. She says she was unaware that exceeding the gigabyte limit would result in any charge, let alone one more than 80 times her monthly internet fee.

The lawsuit alleges that, “Although the customer service summary informed plaintiff and other consumers that their first bill might be higher than expected because of a $36 activation fee, one month’s service billed in advance, and prorated charges and fees for the month when the customer signed up, neither plaintiff nor other consumers were informed, nor could they have reasonable discerned from the paper work that wireless Internet usage exceeding 5GB per month would result in astronomical charges running into the thousands of dollars.”

The lawsuit alleges counts under Oklahoma consumer protection statutes and common law fraud, charging that Radio Shack’s advertising of the DataConnect plan was false, misleading, and inaccurate.

Parks is seeking restitution for the extra charges she incurred, consequential damages for harm to her credit rating, an injunction to prevent AT&T from enforcing the extra fees, and, most consequentially, an end to DataConnect contracts altogether.

On the go

The plan offered unique appeal for anyone constantly on the go. The Acer notebook sports a compact 8.9 inch screen and weighs less than three pounds, and sports wide-area network capabilities, a WiFi connection, and a built-in webcam . Without the AT&T plan, the computer generally sells for about $300.

The relevant AT&T terms and conditions provide that, “If you are on a data plan that does not include a monthly megabyte allowance and additional data usage rates, the parties agree that AT&T has the right to impose additional charges if you use more than 5 gigabytes in a month.”

The suit threatens to stymie the recent trend toward built-in wireless plans similar to DataConnect. Such arrangements have been gaining popularity in recent years, since they allow consumers to travel without having to make sure that a nearby hotel or coffee shop will be able to provide them internet access. At the very least, the suit threatens to make consumers think twice before entering into any such plan, no matter who is offering it.

And the filing doesn’t exactly come at a great time for Radio Shack, which reported a 39 percent drop in earnings late last month. The company posted these dismal numbers despite a recent surge in sales of digital-box converters in anticipation of the upcoming switchover to digital TV. An analyst told the Wall Street Journal that the retailer is likely headed for its worst-ever same-store results in 2009. And now they will have a class action to contend with as well.



Report Your Experience
If you've had a bad experience -- or a good one -- with a consumer product or service, we'd like to hear about it. All complaints are reviewed by class action attorneys and are considered for publication on our site. Knowledge is power! Help spread the word. File your consumer report now.

Share

Follow us on Twitter.

FREE CONSUMER NEWSLETTERS

The Daily Consumer
Afternoons M-F

Sign up now!


Consumer News & Alerts
Every Sunday

Sign up now!





CONSUMER NEWS

SAFETY RECALLS

Advertisement


Custom Search
AUTOMOTIVE
• Dealers
• Manufacturers
• Service
• Extended Warranties
• Lemon Laws
• Recalls
• Tires
• Transporters

FAMILY
• Aging
• Children, Parenting
• Recalls
• Dating
• Education
• Entertainment
• Pets
• Weddings
FINANCE
• Annuities
• Banks
• Credit Cards
• Debt Collection
• Debt Counseling
• Insurance
• Investing
• Loans
• Mortgages
• Payday Loans
• Student Loans
• Tax Prep

HEALTH
• Doctors
• Drugs, Pharmacies
• Health Clubs
• Hearing Care
• Hospitals
• Nursing Homes
• Nutrition, Diets
• Vision Care
• Weight Loss
HOUSE & HOME
• Appliances
• Cookware
• Furniture
• Home Improvements
• Lawn & Garden
• Movers
• Pools & Spas
• Realtors, Rental Agents
• Recalls
• Utilities

ELECTRONICS
• Cable TV/DBS
• Cameras
• Cell Phones
• Computers
• Home Electronics
• Internet Access
• Local Phone Service
• Long Distance
• VoIP
SHOPPING
• In-Home
• Online
• Retail Stores
• Sporting Goods
• Supermarkets
• Telemarketers

TRAVEL
• Airlines
• Bus Lines
• Car Rental
• Cruises
• Hotels
• Travel Agents
• Trains

RESOURCES
• Class Actions
• Complaint Form
• Small Claims Guide
• Lemon Laws
CONSUMER NEWS
• Latest News
• Automotive
• Telecom
• Financial
• Health
• Homeowners
• Scams
• Seniors
• Travel
• More ...

RECALLS
• Automotive
• Children's Products
• Drugs
• Food
• Household Products
• Sporting Goods

ABOUT US
• FAQ
• Privacy Policy
• Advertise With Us
• Newsroom
• Syndication
• Terms of Use

Terms of Use Your use of this site constitutes acceptance of the Terms of Use

Advertisements on this site are placed and controlled by outside advertising networks. ConsumerAffairs.com does not evaluate or endorse the products and services advertised. See the FAQ for more information.

Company Response Welcome If complaints about your company appear on our site, we welcome your response. Please see the Response Form for more information.

For more information, see the FAQ and privacy policy. The information on this Web site is general in nature and is not intended as a substitute for competent legal advice.  ConsumerAffairs.com Inc. makes no representation as to the accuracy of the information herein provided and assumes no liability for any damages or loss arising from the use thereof. 

Copyright © 2003-2009 ConsumerAffairs.com Inc.  All Rights Reserved.    The contents of this site may not be republished, reprinted, rewritten or recirculated without written permission.