CONSUMER NEWS    RECALLS    COMPLAINT FORM    SCAM ALERTS  


Complain about a product or service

Small Claims Guide | Class Actions | Lemon Law | FAQ | Resources | Newsletters | Spanish
Automotive    Education    Electronics    Family    Finance    Health    Homeowners    Shopping    Travel   
NEWS   Latest |  Archives |  Auto |  Cells, etc. |  Computers |  Financial |  Health |  Homeowners |  Parents |  Privacy |  Scams |  Seniors |  Travel

Farm Bill Provision Would Cut Meat Inspections

Congressman wants to help smaller meat packers





By Mark Huffman
ConsumerAffairs.com

October 2, 2007

Food Safety
pepper photoOne Death Reported in Oklahoma E. coli Outbreak
Feds Approve Irradiation of Spinach, Lettuce
FDA Issues Warning About Frozen Seafood
Whole Foods Extends Beef Recall
Whole Foods Recalls Fresh Ground Beef
Six New E. coli Cases Reported In Massachusetts
FDA Says It Found Salmonella Source In Mexico
U.S. Peppers Get Clean Bill Of Health
Jalapeño Peppers from Mexico Recalled
Tomatoes Get the All-Clear From FDA
Salmonella Toll Quietly Climbs
USDA to List Retailers in Meat Recalls
Emergency Regs Needed for Tracking Produce, Food Groups Say
Nebraska Beef Recall Expanded to 5.3 Million Pounds
Consumer Group Presses Feds to Fix Food System
Kroger Expands Ground Beef Recall
Salmonella Outbreak is Biggest Ever Tied to Produce
E. coli Outbreak May Be Linked To Kroger Ground Beef
Salmonella: Trickier Than Imagined
Congressional Report Faults FDA Inaction
Tomatoes Off the Menu as Feds Search for Source
FDA 'Inaction' Blamed for Salmonella Outbreak
Restaurants Shun Tomatoes In Wake Of Salmonella Outbreak
FDA Warns Of Tomato-Linked Salmonella
USDA Bans Downer Cow Slaughter
CDC Links 2006 Salmonella Outbreak to Dog Food
---
More ...

With concerns mounting daily over the safety of the U.S. food supply, it might make sense that Congress would mandate an increase in food inspections.

But instead, a provision of the House-passed version of the 2007 Farm Bill would actually require fewer inspections for some meat.

The provision, authored by Rep. Collin Peterson (D-MN), would require fewer federal inspections for meat that is processed by small companies and shipped to another state.

Currently, meat lacking a federal inspection stamp can only be sold in the state where it is produced. Only state inspections are required for those products.

The Chicago Tribune reports the change is intended to help small meat packing plants in the Midwest. The newspaper quotes congressional staff as saying these small companies could greatly expand their business if allowed to ship nationwide.

But in the wake of last week’s massive Topps Beef hamburger recall, many consumer advocates don’t see it that way.

They, along with the federal meat inspectors union, are opposing this particular aspect of the Farm Bill, currently making its way through the Senate. These critics argue that state inspection standards are hardly consistent, and that uniform, federal standards are the only way to protect the public.

In the Topps case, the recalled hamburger patties were suspected of E. coli contamination. So far this year, the Department of Agriculture has recalled nearly 28 million pounds of ground beef.

Stan Painter, a USDA inspector and an official with the American Federation of Government Employees union, which represents federal meat inspectors, told the Tribune that small plants may apply to have a federal inspector on site, but that wouldn’t necessarily help them.

“I'm not sure the smaller plants are capable of meeting federal standard,” Painter said.

Peterson’s proposal appears to be at odds with other Democrats in Congress, who have called for greater federal inspections of the food supply.

In September, Sen. Tom Harkin (D-IA), chairman of the Senate Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition and Forestry, introduced the Fresh Produce Safety Act of 2007.

It would require the FDA to develop and enforce mandatory “good agricultural practices” for growers and manufacturers in the US. Currently, there are only voluntary guidelines.



Report Your Experience
If you've had a bad experience -- or a good one -- with a consumer product or service, we'd like to hear about it. All complaints are reviewed by class action attorneys and are considered for publication on our site. Knowledge is power! Help spread the word. File your consumer report now.


Consumer News

August 29 2008

Recent Recalls & Safety Alerts



FREE CONSUMER NEWSLETTERS

The Daily Consumer
Afternoons M-F

Sign up now!


Consumer News & Alerts
Every Sunday

Sign up now!


Knowledge is free.
Knowledge is power.







Back to the top |

Advertisement


Home | Complaint Form | News | Recalls | FAQ |
Consumer Resources | Small Claims Guide | Lemon Law | Newsletter | Contact Us
Advertise With Us | Testimonials | Newsroom | RSS Feeds |


Terms of Use Your use of this site constitutes acceptance of the Terms of Use

Advertisements on this site are placed and controlled by outside advertising networks. ConsumerAffairs.com does not evaluate or endorse the products and services advertised. See the FAQ for more information.

Company Response Welcome If complaints about your company appear on our site, we welcome your response. Please see the Response Form for more information.

For more information, see the FAQ and privacy policy. The information on this Web site is general in nature and is not intended as a substitute for competent legal advice.  ConsumerAffairs.com Inc. makes no representation as to the accuracy of the information herein provided and assumes no liability for any damages or loss arising from the use thereof. 

Copyright © 2003-2008 ConsumerAffairs.com Inc.  All Rights Reserved.    The contents of this site may not be republished, reprinted, rewritten or recirculated without written permission.