The technology officer of a payday loan marketer has agreed to pay $850,000 to settle Federal Trade Commission (FTC) charges for his role in an allegedly deceptive and unfair scheme.

The scheme allegedly debited the bank accounts of hundreds of thousands of cash-strapped consumers in violation of federal law.

The FTC complaint contends that Swish Marketing Inc. and its three officers -- Mark Benning, Matthew Patterson, and Jason Strober -- operated Websites advertising short-term, or "payday," loan-matching services. The Websites included an online loan application form that tricked consumers into unknowingly ordering a debit card when they applied for a loan online.

Consumers duped

On numerous sites, clicking the button for submitting loan applications led to four product offers unrelated to the loan, each with tiny "Yes" and "No" buttons. "No" was pre-clicked for three of them; "Yes" was pre-clicked for a debit card, with fine-print disclosures asserting the consumer's consent to have their bank account debited. Consumers who simply clicked a prominent "Finish matching me with a payday loan provider!" button were charged for the debit card. Other websites touted the card as a "bonus" and disclosed the fee only in fine print below the submit button. As a result, consumers allegedly were improperly charged up to $54.95 each.

In August 2009, the FTC charged these marketers and VirtualWorks LLC -- the debit card company that helped them design the online offers -- with deceptive business practices. The debit card company paid Swish Marketing up to $15 for each transaction. The debit card company defendants have settled the charges against them.

Additional charges

In April 2010, the FTC filed an amended complaint against the payday loan marketers, adding an allegation that the defendants sold consumers' bank account information to the debit card company without the consumers' consent.

The amended complaint further states that Benning, Patterson, and Strober were made aware of consumer complaints about the unauthorized debits, as indicated in their e-mail and instant messages. For example, Patterson explained that consumers were going "ballistic" about the debit because the offer was defaulted to yes "...and customers don't see it." More than six months after first learning of the complaints, Benning allegedly described the practice of defaulting to "Yes" as "fraud and identity theft."

The settlement order with Strober, the Vice President of Product Development and/or Engineering of Swish Marketing, bars him from misrepresenting material facts about a product or service, such as the cost or the method for charging consumers. He also is permanently prohibited from misrepresenting that a product or service is free or a "bonus" without disclosing all material terms and conditions, and from charging consumers without first disclosing what billing information will be used, the amount to be paid, how and on whose account the payment will be assessed, and all material terms and conditions.

The order further requires that transactions be affirmatively authorized by consumers, and that Strober, in marketing financial products or services, monitor his affiliates to ensure compliance with the order. He also is required to provide specific cooperation to the FTC in its ongoing litigation. In addition, the order requires him to pay $850,000.