By James Limbach
July 13, 2010
A new Federal Trade Commission (FTC) report concludes that the system for resolving consumer debt collection disputes is broken, and recommends significant litigation and arbitration reforms to give consumers a fair shake.
The report, "Repairing A Broken System: Protecting Consumers in Debt Collection Litigation and Arbitration," is drawn from information gathered at roundtable discussions the FTC held throughout the country in 2009, as well as public comments and the FTC's experience in debt collection matters.
The roundtables followed a February 2009 report that identified some concerns with debt collection litigation and arbitration, but concluded that more information was needed about certain debt collection litigation and arbitration practices before further recommendations could be made.
Lack of info
The report found that debt collection litigation raised concerns about collectors failing to give consumers proper notification of suits that have been filed, collectors filing suits based on insufficient evidence of indebtedness, courts frequently granting default judgments against consumers who do not appear or defend themselves, collectors seeking to recover on debts beyond the statute of limitations, and banks freezing funds in bank accounts that are exempt from garnishment by law.
Horacio of Santa Cruz, CA, has had experience with agents trying to collect on non-existent debts. He tells ConsumerAffairs.com that he got a letter from the Academy Collection Service, "saying I owe $321.71 to First USA but I don't have an account with them so what's the deal?"
Shortly after having open-heart surgery, Joseph from Asbury Park, NJ, got a call from Cynthia from ACS regarding credit card debt. "I told her that I was under a doctor's care and could not discuss this, due to the added stress, until I was released by my doctor," he says. "She proceeded to press the matter and I hung up. She called again the following day and again ignored my request to be left alone."
Joseph told ConsumerAffairs.com that when he asked Cynthia for the name of the company she worked for, its address and telephone number, "she gave me her name, the company's name, an 800 number which was not the number she was calling from. She flatly refused to give me the address or location of the company she worked for."
Fixing the problems
The Commission makes the following recommendations to address these concerns:
States should consider adopting measures to make it more likely that consumers will defend themselves in litigation, decreasing the prevalence of default judgments.
States should require collectors to include more information about the alleged debt in their complaints.
States should take steps to make it less likely that collectors will sue on debt on which the statute of limitations has run.
Federal and state laws should be changed to prevent the freezing of a specified amount in a bank account including funds exempt from garnishment.
The FTC's new report also addresses concerns about requiring consumers to resolve debt collection disputes through binding arbitration without meaningful choice, bias or the appearance of bias in arbitration proceedings, and procedural unfairness in arbitration proceedings. In its new report, the commission's principal recommendations regarding debt collection arbitration are:
Consumers should have a meaningful choice about arbitrating debt collection disputes.
Arbitration forums and arbitrators should eliminate bias and the appearance of bias.
Arbitration forums should conduct proceedings in a manner that makes it more likely that consumers will participate.
Arbitration forums should require that awards contain more information about how the case was decided and how the award amount was calculated.
Arbitration forums should make their process and results more transparent.
The FTC said it would closely monitor debt collection arbitration and evaluate whether creditors and arbitration forums provide consumers with meaningful choice and a fair process. It also said that -- as appropriate -- it will report its views on new debt collection arbitration models to policymakers, industry, consumer groups, and the general public.