The loophole in banking laws that Wal-Mart and other retail giants are using to charter their own banks may soon be closed, thanks to a new bill drafted in part by Congressman Barney Frank (D-MA).
Frank, along with Rep. Paul Gilmor (R-OH), introduced the "Industrial Bank Holding Company Act of 2006" on July 10th. it would prohibit the purchase of industrial loan companies (ILCs) by commercial entities, and would grant the FDIC greater ability to oversee and regulate ILCs.
Frank said that "the proliferation of new ILC applications is creating a situation where Congress must set appropriate policy to preserve the integrity of the banking system."
"ILCs are being used by a few commercial companies to expand a loophole big enough to drive a truck through," said Gilmor.
"With a historic number of pending ILC applications, Congress and the FDIC must work together to craft regulations which retain the wall between banking and commerce."
Retailers such as Wal-Mart and Target have been pushing to purchase ILCs, which perform many of the functions of a traditional bank, such as payment processing capability, but operate under much less scrutiny from banking authorities.
Consumer groups and local banks oppose the move, out of fear that retailer-owned banks will undercut community banks with lower prices and loan rates, and drive them out of business.
Home Depot recently announced plans to buy home improvement lender EnerBank, an industrial bank based in Utah, in order to use its loan services to offer customers money for remodeling projects.
The majority of American ILCs are based in Utah, due to its lenient laws on chartering banks. Utah has an agreement with 20 states that enables ILCs based there to expand, but the remaining 29 states would require additional negotiations.
Opponents of retail banks fear that a retail company located in all 50 states could circumvent the negotiations and open branches everywhere it had stores.
The Government Accountability Office (GAO) issued a new report on July 12th discussing the growth of ILCs, following a previous report issued in September 2005.
The GAO study found that as of March 2006, "6 ILCs owned over 80 percent of the total assets for the ILC industry, with aggregate assets totaling over $125 billion and collectively controlled about $68 billion in FDIC-insured depositsmost of the growth occurred in the state of Utah while the portion of ILC assets in other states declined."
The GAO investigation also found that ILCs that offered instruments such as credit cards would be able to charge the maximum interest rate allowable in the ILC's home state, much as credit card companies base in states with lenient lending laws, such as South Dakota and Delaware.
The report warned against the excessive mixing of "banking and commerce" that a bank chartered for a retail store might bring.
"[To] foster the prospects of their commercial affiliates, banks may restrict credit to their affiliates' competitors, or tie the provision of credit to the sale of products by their commercial affiliates," said the report. "Commercially affiliated banks may also extend credit to their commercial affiliates or affiliate partners, when they would not have done so otherwise."