Pet Food Recalls and Safety Alerts

This living topic focuses on the numerous recalls and warnings issued regarding pet food safety. It highlights various incidents where pet food products were contaminated with harmful substances such as melamine, aflatoxin, and salmonella, leading to severe health issues and deaths in pets. The content covers specific recalls from brands like Diamond Pet Foods, Nutro, and Blue Buffalo, detailing the legal actions taken, the health risks involved, and the steps affected pet owners can take. It also discusses broader concerns about the pet food industry, including the sourcing of ingredients and the regulatory challenges in ensuring pet food safety.

Article Timeline

Newest
  • Newest
  • Oldest
Article Image

Fromm Family Foods recalls Four Star Shredded Entrée dog food

Fromm Family Foods is recalling approximately 5,500 cases of Fromm Shredded Entrée dog food.

The products may have elevated levels of Vitamin D, which can cause vomiting, loss of appetite, increased thirst, increased urination, excessive drooling, and weight loss. There are no reports of illness or injury to date

A list of the recalled products, packaged in 12-oz. cans with a Best By Date of 08/2024 and sold at neighborhood pet stores nationwide, may be found here.

What to do

Customers who purchased the recalled products should stop feeding them to their dogs and return them to their retailer.

Consumers with questions may contact the company at (800) 325-6331 Monday through Friday from 8:00 am --5:00 pm (CT), or by email at info@frommfamily.com.

Fromm Family Foods is recalling approximately 5,500 cases of Fromm Shredded Entrée dog food.The products may have elevated levels of Vitamin D, which c...

Article Image

Top Quality Dog Food recalls Beef HVM

Top Quality Dog Food of Hyattsville, Md., is recalling 1-lb. packages Beef HVM.

The product may be contaminated with Salmonella and Listeria Monocytogenes.

No illnesses have been reported to date.

The recalled product, lot #071521, was distributed in Washington, D.C., Maryland. Virginia, Delaware Massachusetts, Connecticut and South Carolina, and sold through mail order and direct delivery from July 21, 2021, through August 2, 2021.

What to do

Customers who purchased the recalled product should discard it immediately, or return it to the place of purchase for a full refund.

Consumers with questions may contact the firm at (240) 802-6601 Monday through Friday, 8:00 AM to 4:30 PM (EST) or by email at customerservice@topqualitydogfood.com

Top Quality Dog Food of Hyattsville, Md., is recalling 1-lb. packages Beef HVM. The product may be contaminated with Salmonella and Listeria Monocytogen...

Article Image

Wet Noses recalls Simply Nourish brand frozen dog food

Wet Noses Natural Dog Treat Company of Monroe, Wash., is recalling approximately 51,000 packages of Simply Nourish frozen dog food.

The products contain elevated levels of Vitamin D, which could induce symptoms including vomiting, loss of appetite, increased thirst, increased urination, excessive drooling, and weight loss.

No illnesses have been reported to date.

A list of the recalled products, packaged in 2-lb and 4.5-lb packages across specific date ranges, and sold at select PetSmart stores nationwide, may be found here.

What to do

Customers who purchased the recalled products should stop feeding them to their dogs, and return them to the place of purchase for a full refund

Consumers with questions may contact the company at (866) 938-6673 Monday – Friday, from 8 am – 4:30 pm (PST).

Wet Noses Natural Dog Treat Company of Monroe, Wash., is recalling approximately 51,000 packages of Simply Nourish frozen dog food. The products contain...

Article Image

Sunshine Mills dog food products recalled over potentially harmful mold issue

Pet food maker Sunshine Mills has voluntarily recalled some of its dog food products because of “potentially elevated” levels of Aflatoxin -- a byproduct of mold that could be harmful to pets if consumed in large quantities. 

In a recall alert, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) said the affected products were sold at stores across the U.S. under the company’s brands of Triumph, Evolve, Wild Harvest, Nurture Farms, Pure Being, and Elm. 

A list of affected products can be viewed here. All of the products have a "best if used by date" of Feb. 11, 2022. 

Discontinue use immediately

The FDA describes Aflatoxin as “a naturally occurring by-product from the growth of Aspergillus flavus” that can grow on pet food ingredients such as corn, peanuts, and other grains. The agency said levels of Aflatoxin “above the acceptable limit” were detected in the products being recalled.

No illnesses linked to the products have been reported. The company said it initiated the recall as a “precautionary measure.” 

Pets who have recently consumed any of the products should be monitored for symptoms that include sluggishness or lethargy, reluctance to eat, vomiting, yellowish tint to the eyes or gums, and diarrhea.

“Pets that have consumed any of the recalled products and exhibit symptoms of illness including sluggishness or lethargy combined with a reluctance to eat, vomiting, yellowish tint to the eyes or gums, or diarrhea should be seen by a veterinarian,” Sunshine Mills said. 

Consumers who have purchased the products are advised to stop feeding them to pets and to return unused portions to the place of purchase for full refund. Sunshine Mills says customers with questions can contact their customer service center at 800-705-2111 or email questions to customer.service@sunshinemills.com.

Pet food maker Sunshine Mills has voluntarily recalled some of its dog food products because of “potentially elevated” levels of Aflatoxin -- a byproduct o...

Article Image

Freshpet Select Small Dog Bite Size Beef & Egg Recipe Dog Food recalled

Freshpet is recalling a single lot of Freshpet Select Small Dog Bite Size Beef & Egg Recipe Dog Food.

The product may be contaminated with Salmonella.

There are no reports of illness, injury, or adverse reaction to date.

The recalled product, which comes in1-lb bags with Sell by Date 10/30/2021, lot code 1421FBP0101, and UPC 627975012939, was inadvertently shipped to retailers in limited geographic markets from June 7 – 10, 2021.

What to do

Customers who purchased the recalled product should stop feeding it to their dogs and discard it.

Consumers desiring a refund may do so online at http://freshpet.co/ssdb21.

Consumers with questions may contact the firm at (866) 789-3737, Monday through Friday, 9 am – 9 pm (EDT) and Saturday & Sunday 9 am – 1 pm (EDT) or at www.freshpet.com.

Freshpet is recalling a single lot of Freshpet Select Small Dog Bite Size Beef & Egg Recipe Dog Food. The product may be contaminated with Salmonella. ...

Article Image

Sunshine Mills recalls Sportsman’s Pride, Sprout, Intimidator and FRM Gold Select dog food

Sunshine Mills is recalling Sportsman’s Pride, Sprout Sporting, Intimidator, FRM Gold Select dog food.

The products may be contaminated with Salmonella.

No illnesses, injuries or complaints have been reported to date.

A list of the recalled products, with best buy date and lot code on the back of each package, may be found here.

The recalled products were sold in retail stores and online.

What to do

Customers who purchased the recalled products should discontinue using them and return the unused portion to the place of purchase for a full refund.

Consumers may contact Sunshine Mills at (800) 705-2111 from 7AM to 4PM (CT), Monday through Friday, or by email at customer.service@sunshinemills.com for additional information.

Sunshine Mills is recalling Sportsman’s Pride, Sprout Sporting, Intimidator, FRM Gold Select dog food.The products may be contaminated with Salmonella....

Article Image

Natural Balance Pet Foods recalls dry cat food

Natural Balance Pet Foods of San Diego, Calif., is recalling Natural Balance L.I.D. Limited Ingredient Diets Green Pea & Chicken Formula Dry Cat Food.

The product may be contaminated with Salmonella.

No customer complaints or illnesses have been reported to date.

The following product, sold in retail stores nationwide and online, is being recalled:

  • 5-lb bag, Natural Balance L.I.D. Limited Ingredient Diets Green Pea & Chicken Formula Dry Cat Food, UPC code 2363300233, lot code 1008080 06:42N811202:20 and “Best if Used by Date 10-Mar-2022.
  • 10-lb bag, Natural Balance L.I.D. Limited Ingredient Diets Green Pea & Chicken Formula Dry Cat Food, UPC code 2363300235, lot code 1008080 06:42N811202:20 and “Best if Used by Date 10-Mar-2022.

What to do

Customers who purchased the recalled product should stop feeding it to their cats and discard immediately or return it to the place of purchase for a refund. Return information may be found on the back panel of each bag.

Consumers with questions may contact the firm at (833)558-0908, Monday through Friday, 8 a.m. – 5 p.m. (PST), or online at www.naturalbalanceinc.com/contact-us.

Natural Balance Pet Foods of San Diego, Calif., is recalling Natural Balance L.I.D. Limited Ingredient Diets Green Pea & Chicken Formula Dry Cat Food. T...

Article Image

J. M. Smucker recalls Meow Mix

The J. M. Smucker Company is recalling two lots of Meow Mix Original Choice Dry Cat Food.

The products may be contaminated with Salmonella.

There are no reports of pet illness or adverse reactions.

A list of the recalled products, sold at select Walmart stores in Illinois, Missouri, Nebraska, New Mexico, Oklahoma, Utah, Wisconsin and Wyoming may be found here.

What to do

Customers who purchased the recalled products should stop feeding them to their cats and dispose of them immediately.

Consumers with questions may contact the company at (888) 569-6728, Monday through Friday, 8 a.m. – 5 p.m. (ET) or online at www.meowmix.com/contact-us.

The J. M. Smucker Company is recalling two lots of Meow Mix Original Choice Dry Cat Food.The products may be contaminated with Salmonella.There are...

Article Image

Midwestern Pet Foods recalls dog and cat food

Midwestern Pet Foods of Evansville, Ind., is recalling various dog and cat foods.

The products may be contaminated with salmonella.

No human or pet illnesses have been reported to date.

A list of the recalled products, sold in retail stores nationwide, online and in Bahrain, Barbados, Chile, Costa Rica, Ghana, Honduras, Iceland, Indonesia, Ireland, Israel, Kuwait, Malaysia, New Zealand, Puerto Rico, Singapore, Taiwan, Trinidad and Tobago, United Arab Emirates, and Uruguay, may be found here.

Lot code information may be found on the back of the bags with the following format:

“EXP AUG/02/22/M1/L#

What to do

Customers who purchased the recalled products should not feed them to pets or any other animals, but should destroy them in a way that children, pets and wildlife cannot access them.

Consumers with questions may contact the company at (800) 474-4163, ext 455. from 8 AM to 5 PM (CT) Monday through Friday or by email at info@midwesternpetfoods.com.

Midwestern Pet Foods of Evansville, Ind., is recalling various dog and cat foods.The products may be contaminated with Salmonella.No human or pet i...

Article Image

Midwestern Pet Foods launches a major recall due to possible salmonella contamination

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) reports Midwestern Pet Foods has launched a major recall of several dog and cat food brands because some of the products might be contaminated with salmonella.

The agency says the pathogen can be harmful, even deadly for pets. It can also pose a health threat to humans who handle the products.

The recall stretches across five brands -- CanineX, Earthborn, Sportmix, Meridian, and Pro Pac. The products were produced at a plant in Monmouth, Ill.

“Healthy people infected with Salmonella should monitor themselves for some or all of the following symptoms: nausea, vomiting, diarrhea or bloody diarrhea, abdominal cramping, and fever,” the company said in an announcement posted by the FDA. “Rarely, Salmonella can result in more serious ailments, including arterial infections, endocarditis, arthritis, muscle pain, eye irritation, and urinary tract symptoms. Consumers exhibiting these signs after having contact with this product should contact their healthcare providers.”

Another recall in January

In January, the FDA issued a safety advisory for certain lots of Sportmix products, saying high levels of aflatoxin, which is toxic to some animals, was believed to be the cause of death for 28 dogs. The company voluntarily recalled the product.

Weeks later, the FDA widened the recall of Sportmix after receiving additional reports that some pets had died after consuming it. 

This time the company said it is erring on the side of caution in issuing the voluntary recall. The company said it issued the recall after routine sampling by company inspectors detected the salmonella. It said there had been no human or pet illnesses reported to date.

Symptoms

Salmonella is a foodborne pathogen that causes hundreds of cases of food poisoning among humans each year but is just as likely to affect animals. Pets with salmonella infections may be lethargic and have diarrhea or bloody diarrhea, fever, and vomiting. 

Some pets will have only decreased appetite, fever, and abdominal pain. Infected but otherwise healthy pets can be carriers and infect other animals or humans, the company said. 

The current recall involves products sold online and at retail stores nationwide. The products have expiration dates ranging from April 2022 through September 2022. 

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) reports Midwestern Pet Foods has launched a major recall of several dog and cat food brands because some of the...

Article Image

Bravo Packing expands pet food recall

Bravo Packing of Carneys Point, N.J.. is expanding its earlier recall of two pet food products to include all pet food and bones in all package sizes.

The products may be contaminated with Salmonella and Listeria monocytogenes.

No human or animal illnesses have been reported to date.

A list of the recalled products, sold in retail stores and to consumers directly nationwide, may be found here.

What to do

Customers who purchased the recalled products should handle them with caution and discard them in a secure container.

Consumers with questions may contact Bravo Packing at (856) 299-1044 Monday – Friday, 9:00 AM-2:00 PM (EST).

Bravo Packing of Carneys Point, N.J.. is expanding its earlier recall of two pet food products to include all pet food and bones in all package sizes.T...

Article Image

Bravo Packing recalls all Performance Dog and Ground Beef Raw Pet Food

Bravo Packing of Carneys Point, N.J., is recalling all Ground Beef and Performance Dog, a frozen raw pet food.

The products may be contaminated with Salmonella and Listeria monocytogenes.

No human or animal illnesses have been reported to date.

The recalled products, which come frozen in 2-lb and 5-lb plastic sleeves, were sold in brick-and-mortar retail stores or to consumers directly nationwide.

What to do

Consumers who purchased the recalled products should discard them.

Consumers with questions may contact Bravo Packing at (856) 299-1044 Monday -- Friday, 9:00AM -- 2:00PM, (EST).

Bravo Packing of Carneys Point, N.J., is recalling all Ground Beef and Performance Dog, a frozen raw pet food. The products may be contaminated with Sal...

Article Image

Vitakraft Sun Seed recalls Vitakraft Vita Smart Hedgehog Food

Vitakraft Sun Seed of Weston, Ohio, is recalling one lot of Vitakraft Vita Smart Hedgehog Food.

The product may be contaminated with Salmonella, and there is risk to humans from handling it.

There are no reports of illness to date.

The recalled product, lot # 343422 and UPC code 0-51233-34792-9, comes in a 25-oz. container with an expiration date of November 6, 2022.

What to do

Customers who purchased the recalled product should stop using it and may return the unused portion to the place of purchase for a full refund.

Consumers with questions may contact the company at (800) 221-6175 Extension 123, Monday through Friday from 8:30am to 5:00pm (EST).

Vitakraft Sun Seed of Weston, Ohio, is recalling one lot of Vitakraft Vita Smart Hedgehog Food.The product may be contaminated with Salmonella, and the...

Article Image

FDA expands Sportmix pet food recall after additional pet deaths reported

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has broadened a recall of Sportmix pet foods following reports of dozens of additional canine deaths.

Last week, the agency recalled certain lots of Sportmix pet food after finding that the pet food contained high levels of aflatoxin, which is toxic to pets. The agency said 28 dogs had died in connection to the product, and eight others became ill. 

On Tuesday, the FDA issued an updated advisory saying that 70 dogs have died and over 80 others have gotten sick after consuming Sportmix pet food. 

Sportmix products, which are manufactured by Midwestern Pet Foods, were recalled on December 30. The manufacturer has now expanded the recall to include additional products that contain corn and were made in the same manufacturing facility. 

The affected products have an expiration date on or before July 9, 2022 and have "05" in the date or lot code.

Products contain high levels of aflatoxin

Aflatoxin is a toxin produced by the mold Aspergillus flavus. It can grow on corn and other grains used to make pet food and potentially cause pets to die or become ill when consumed in high levels. 

FDA officials said symptoms of aflatoxin poisoning include sluggishness, loss of appetite, vomiting, jaundice (yellowish tint to the eyes or gums due to liver damage), and/or diarrhea. 

“In severe cases, this toxicity can be fatal. In some cases, pets may suffer liver damage but not show any symptoms,” according to the agency. 

The FDA recommends that owners of pets who have eaten the products involved in the recall contact their veterinarian even if they’re not showing symptoms, but especially if they are showing symptoms. 

“Pet owners should stop feeding their pets the recalled products listed below and consult their veterinarian, especially if the pet is showing signs of illness,” the FDA said in December. “The pet owner should remove the food and make sure no other animals have access to the recalled product.” 

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has broadened a recall of Sportmix pet foods following reports of dozens of additional canine deaths.Last w...

Article Image

FDA warns pet owners of pet food containing dangerous toxin

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has issued a safety advisory concerning pet food containing high levels of aflatoxin, which is toxic to pets. The agency said 28 dogs have died in connection to the pet food in question and eight others became ill. 

The FDA said it has found that certain lots of Sportmix products, manufactured by Midwestern Pet Foods, caused the canine deaths and illnesses. The company voluntarily recalled the products last week. 

The agency said it is still looking into whether more products contain high levels of aflatoxin. In total, nine lots of Sportmix products have so far been found to contain high levels of the toxin. 

“Case counts and the scope of this recall may expand as new information becomes available,” the FDA said in its announcement. 

What is aflatoxin? 

Aflatoxin is a toxin produced by the mold Aspergillus flavus, the FDA said. It can grow on corn and other grains used to make pet food. Consuming high levels of the toxin can cause pets to become ill or even die. 

FDA officials said symptoms of aflatoxin poisoning include sluggishness, loss of appetite, vomiting, jaundice (yellowish tint to the eyes or gums due to liver damage), and/or diarrhea. 

“In severe cases, this toxicity can be fatal. In some cases, pets may suffer liver damage but not show any symptoms,” according to the agency. 

To be safe, the FDA recommends that owners of pets who have eaten the products involved in the recall contact their veterinarian.  

“Pet owners should stop feeding their pets the recalled products listed below and consult their veterinarian, especially if the pet is showing signs of illness,” the FDA said. “The pet owner should remove the food and make sure no other animals have access to the recalled product.” 

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has issued a safety advisory concerning pet food containing high levels of aflatoxin, which is toxic to pets. The ag...

Article Image

Albright’s Raw Dog Food recalls Chicken Recipe For Dogs

Albright’s Raw Dog Food of Fort Wayne, Ind., is recalling 67 cases of Chicken Recipe for Dogs.

The product may be contaminated with Salmonella.

One animal illness has been repor ted. No human illnesses have been reported to date.

The recalled product is labeled Albright’s Raw Dog Food Chicken Recipe for Dogs and is packaged in 2 lbs chubs/rolls. Each chub/roll is printed with “Lot number C000185, Best By 19 May 2021.”

It was sold frozen through retail stores, mail order and direct delivery in California, Florida, Illinois, Indiana, New Hampshire, New Jersey, Nevada, New York, Pennsylvania and Tennessee

What to do

Customers who purchased the recalled product should return it to the place of purchase for a full refund.

Consumers with questions may contact the company at (260) 422-9440 Monday – Friday, 8 am – 4 pm (EST).

Albright’s Raw Dog Food of Fort Wayne, Ind., is recalling 67 cases of Chicken Recipe for Dogs. The product may be contaminated with Salmonella. One a...

Article Image

Sunshine Mills expands dog food recall

Sunshine Mills is expanding its earlier recall of dog food products that were made with corn that may contain aflatoxin at levels exceeding FDA guidelines.

The expansion includes corn-based pet food products produced between April 3, 2020, and April 5, 2020. aflatoxin is a naturally occurring mold by-product from the growth of Aspergillus flavus and can be harmful to pets if consumed in significant quantities.

No illnesses have been reported to date.

A listed of the affected products sold in retail stores throughout the U.S. may be found here.

What to do

Customers who purchased the recalled products should discontinue using them return the unused portion to the place of purchase for a full refund.

Consumers with questions may contact Sunshine Mills customer service at (800) 705-2111 from 7AM to 4PM (CT) Monday through Friday, or by email at customer.service@sunshinemills.com.

Sunshine Mills is expanding its earlier recall of dog food products that were made with corn that may contain aflatoxin at levels exceeding FDA guidelines....

Article Image

Real Pet Food recalls Billy+Margot Wild Kangaroo and Superfoods Recipe dog food

Real Pet Food Company is recalling Billy+Margot Wild Kangaroo and Superfoods Recipe dog food.

The product may be contaminated with Salmonella.

The recalled product, which comes in a 4-lb bag, with lot code V 07 Feb 2022, was sold in retail stores nationally.

What to do

Customers who purchased the recalled product stop feeding the product to their dogs, dispose of the product immediately, wash their hands, and sanitize affected surfaces.

Consumers may contact the company at (800) 467-5494 between 8 am and 10 pm (EST) for a refund or for additional information.

Real Pet Food Company is recalling Billy+Margot Wild Kangaroo and Superfoods Recipe dog food. The product may be contaminated with Salmonella. The re...

Article Image

Sunshine Mills recalls dog food

Sunshine Mills is recalling three dog food products that may contain elevated levels of aflatoxin.

Aflatoxin is a naturally occurring mold by-product from the growth of Aspergillus flavus and can be harmful to pets if consumed in significant quantities.

Symptoms of illness include sluggishness or lethargy combined with a reluctance to eat, vomiting, yellowish tint to the eyes or gums, or diarrhea.

No illnesses have been reported to date.

A list of the recalled products, sold in retail stores nationally, may be found here.

What to do

Customers who purchased the recalled products should discontinue using them and may return the unused portion to the place of purchase for a full refund.

Consumers with questions may contact Sunshine Mills customer service at (800) 705-2111 from 7AM to 4PM (CT) Monday through Friday, or by email at customer.service@sunshinemills.com.

Sunshine Mills is recalling three dog food products that may contain elevated levels of aflatoxin. Aflatoxin is a naturally occurring mold by-product fr...

Article Image

Sunshine Mills recalls Nature’s Menu dog food

Sunshine Mills is recalling Nature’s Menu Super Premium Dog Food with a Blend of Real Chicken & Quail.

The product may be contaminated with Salmonella.

No illnesses, injuries or complaints have been reported to date.

The recalled product, which come in a 3-pound bag with UPC codes 7015514363 and 7015514365, were sold in retail stores nationally and have the following lot codes:

  • TE1 20/April /2020, TE1 21/April/2020, TE1 22/April/2020, TE2 20/April /2020, TE2 21/April/2020,
  • TE2 22/April/2020, TE3 20/April/2020, TE3 21/April/2020, TE3 22/April/2020.
  • The product comes in a 13.5-pound bag with the following lot codes:
  • TB1 20/April /2020, TB1 21/April/2020, TB1 22/April/2020, TB2 20/April /2020, TB2 21/April/2020,
  • TB2 22/April/2020, TB3 20/April/2020, TB3 21/April/2020, TB3 22/April/2020.

What to do

Customers who purchased the recalled product should discontinue use and may return the unused portion to the place of purchase for a full refund.

Consumers may contact Sunshine Mills customer service at (800) 705-2111 from 7AM to 4PM (CT) Monday through Friday, or by email at customer.service@sunshinemills.com.

Sunshine Mills is recalling Nature’s Menu Super Premium Dog Food with a Blend of Real Chicken & Quail. The product may be contaminated with Salmonella. ...

Article Image

Smucker recalls canned cat food

The J. M. Smucker Company is recalling one lot of Natural Balance Ultra Premium Chicken & Liver Paté Formula canned cat food.

Health concerns likely associated with elevated levels of choline chloride have been raised.

The company has received reports of adverse reactions.

The following product, most commonly sold in pet specialty retailers and online throughout the U.S., and Canada, are being recalled:

Product NameRetail UPC CodeLot CodeBest If Used By Date
Natural Balance® Ultra Premium Chicken & Liver Paté Formula canned cat food
5.5 oz can
2363353227921780308 04 2021

What to do

Customers who purchased the recalled product should stop feeding it to their cats and dispose of it.

Consumers with questions or who want to report adverse reactions may contact the company at (888) 569-6828, Monday through Friday, 8 a.m. – 5 p.m. (ET), or by email at info@naturalbalanceinc.com.

The J. M. Smucker Company is recalling one lot of Natural Balance Ultra Premium Chicken & Liver Paté Formula canned cat food. Health concerns likely ass...

Article Image

IcelandicPlus recalls whole Capelin Fish Pet Treats

IcelandicPlus of Ft. Washington, Pa., is recalling its Capelin Pet Treats.

Some of the fish have exceeded the FDA compliance guideline for fish larger than five inches. The agency has determined that salt-cured, dried, or fermented un-eviscerated fish larger than five inches have been linked to outbreaks of botulism poisoning in humans.

There are no reports of illnesses of dogs, cats or people in connection with Capelin.

The recalled product is packaged in a 2.5 ounce tube or a 1.5 or 2.5 ounce bag marked “Icelandic+ Capelin WHOLE FISH, PURE FISH TREATS FOR DOGS,” or “PURE FISH TREATS FOR CATS,” UPC CODES, 8 5485400775 9; 8 5485400711 7; and 8 5485400757 5. (lot numbers 02/2020 to 02/2022), and sold to consumers nationwide through independent pet specialty stores.

What to do

Customers who purchased the recalled product should return it to the place of purchase for a refund.

Consumers with questions may contact the company at (857) 246-9559. Monday – Friday, 8am – 5pm (EST).

IcelandicPlus of Ft. Washington, Pa., is recalling its Capelin Pet Treats. Some of the fish have exceeded the FDA compliance guideline for fish larger t...

Article Image

J. M. Smucker recalls Special Kitty wet, canned cat food

The J. M. Smucker Company is recalling specific lots of Special Kitty wet, canned cat food.

Ingredients in the product are believed to not meet the company’s quality and safety standards.

Ingesting the recalled products may cause nausea with excessive salivation, diarrhea or vomiting to more severe symptoms including difficulty walking, seizures and -- in extreme situations -- death.

The following products, sold individually and as part of variety packs, are being recalled:.

Product NameRetail UPC CodeLot CodeBest If Used By Date
Special Kitty®
Mixed Grill Dinner Pate 5.5 oz. metal can
681131078962 9263803 9/19/2021
Product NameRetail UPC CodeLot CodeBest If Used By Date
Special Kitty Surf & Turf Variety Pack of Pate Cat Food in 5.5 oz metal cans681131079235 9266803 7/17/2021
 8/29/2021
 9/11/2021
 9/12/2021
Special Kitty Surf & Turf Variety Pack of Pate Cat Food in 5.5 oz metal cans681131079235 9267803 7/17/2021
 8/29/2021
 9/11/2021
 9/12/2021
Special Kitty Surf & Turf Variety Pack of Pate Cat Food in 5.5 oz metal cans681131079235 9287803 9/12/2021
 9/19/2021
 10/7/2021

The recalled products were sold in grocery stores nationwide and online.

What to do

Customers who purchased the recalled products should stop feeding them to their cats and dispose of them.

Consumers with questions may call (888) 569-6767 Monday through Friday, 8 a.m. – 5 p.m. (ET).

The J. M. Smucker Company is recalling specific lots of Special Kitty wet, canned cat food.Ingredients in the product are believed to not meet the comp...

Article Image

FDA cautions against buying Performance Dog Raw Pet Food

U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) officials are warning pet owners not to buy Performance Dog frozen raw pet food produced on or after July 22, 2019. 

The agency said it collected two samples of raw pet food manufactured by Bravo Packing -- Performance Dog, as well as a beef variety -- during a routine inspection of the company’s manufacturing plant.

“The sample of Performance Dog raw pet food lot 072219 tested positive for Salmonella and L. mono,” the FDA said in a statement. “The sample of the beef raw pet food tested positive for Salmonella, but the product had not yet been distributed.” 

Should be discarded

The FDA recommends throwing away any Performance Dog products purchased on or after the date specified. All 2-pound and 5-pound plastic pouches of Performance Dog frozen dog food are involved in the recall.

The agency added that it’s concerned that consumers may still have these products in their possession since they’re sold and stored frozen. 

Although no pet or human illnesses have been reported, health officials said the product “represents a serious threat to human and animal health.” Symptoms of the infection include vomiting, diarrhea, fever, and loss of appetite.

“People with symptoms of Salmonella or L. mono infection should consult their health care providers,” the FDA said. “Consult a veterinarian if your pet has symptoms of Salmonella or L. mono infection.” 

This isn’t the first time Bravo Packing has been forced to issue a recall. In September 2018, another sample of the Carney’s Point, N.J-based company’s pet food also tested positive for contamination. 

U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) officials are warning pet owners not to buy Performance Dog frozen raw pet food produced on or after July 22, 2019....

Article Image

TDBBS recalls pig ear pet treats

TDBBS is recalling two pig ear pet treat products that may be contaminated with Salmonella.

No illnesses have been reported.

The following products, sold through Amazon.com and shipped to customers between April 22, 2019, and August 13, 2019, are being recalled:  

TDBBS, LLC USA Thick Pig Ear 8 PackTDBBS, LLC USA Thick Pig Ear 20 Pack
UPC: X001768PNBUPC: X000RBC5VF
Best By Date: 4/22/2021 Lot Code: 1129T1Best By Date: 4/22/2021 Lot Code: 1129T1
Best By Date: 6/06/2021 Lot Code: 1549T1Best By Date: 5/13/2021 Lot Code: 1339T1
Best By Date: 8/05/2021 Lot Code: 2179T1

All UPCs, Best By Dates and Lot Codes are located on the package back.

What to do

Customers who purchased the recalled products should dispose of them.

Consumers with questions may contact customer service at (877) 483-5853, Monday through Friday 9 – 5pm or by email at customerservice@tdbbsllc.com.

TDBBS is recalling two pig ear pet treat products that may be contaminated with Salmonella.No illnesses have been reported.The following products,...

Article Image

Brutus & Barnaby recalls Pig Ears Natural Treats for Dogs

Brutus & Barnaby of Clearwater, Fla., is recalling all size variations of Pig Ears for Dogs.

The product may be contaminated with Salmonella.

The recalled product, which comes in 8 count, 12 count, 25 count and 100 count packages labeled “Pig Ears 100% Natural Treats for Dogs” containing the company's trademarked logo, was sold nationwide by Amazon.com, Chewy.com, Brutusandbarnaby.com and the brick and mortar Natures Food Patch in Clearwater, Fla.

What to do

Customers who purchased the recalled product should destroy it and contact the place of purchase for a full refund.

Consumers with questions may contact the company at (800) 489-0970 Monday – Friday, 9am – 5 PM (EST).

Brutus & Barnaby of Clearwater, Fla., is recalling all size variations of Pig Ears for Dogs.The product may be contaminated with Salmonella.The rec...

Article Image

Texas Tripe recalls raw pet food

Texas Tripe is recalling 35 lots for each of 23 varieties of raw pet food.

The products may be contaminated with Salmonella and/or Listeria monocytogenes.

The following products and lot numbers sold frozen in 20-pound and 40-pound cases containing multiple plastic pouches, are being recalled:

  1. Texas Tripe Ground Turkey Necks: 19148, 19149, 19150, 19151, 19152, 19153, 19154, 19155, 19156, 19157, 19158, 19159, 19160, 19161, 19162, 19163, 19164, 19165, 19166, 19167, 19168, 19169, 19170, 19171, 19172, 19173, 19174, 19175, 19176, 19177, 19178, 19179, 19180, 19181, 19182
  2. Texas Trip Chicken Tripe Complete: 19148, 19149, 19150, 19151, 19152, 19153, 19154, 19155, 19156, 19157, 19158, 19159, 19160, 19161, 19162, 19163, 19164, 19165, 19166, 19167, 19168, 19169, 19170, 19171, 19172, 19173, 19174, 19175, 19176, 19177, 19178, 19179, 19180, 19181, 19182
  3. Texas Tripe Ground Chicken w/Bone: 19148, 19149, 19150, 19151, 19152, 19153, 19154, 19155, 19156, 19157, 19158, 19159, 19160, 19161, 19162, 19163, 19164, 19165, 19166, 19167, 19168, 19169, 19170, 19171, 19172, 19173, 19174, 19175, 19176, 19177, 19178, 19179, 19180, 19181, 19182
  4. Texas Tripe Shepherd's Blend: 19148, 19149, 19150, 19151, 19152, 19153, 19154, 19155, 19156, 19157, 19158, 19159, 19160, 19161, 19162, 19163, 19164, 19165, 19166, 19167, 19168, 19169, 19170, 19171, 19172, 19173, 19174, 19175, 19176, 19177, 19178, 19179, 19180, 19181, 19182
  5. Texas Tripe Chicken/Pork/Salmon with Egg: 19148, 19149, 19150, 19151, 19152, 19153, 19154, 19155, 19156, 19157, 19158, 19159, 19160, 19161, 19162, 19163, 19164, 19165, 19166, 19167, 19168, 19169, 19170, 19171, 19172, 19173, 19174, 19175, 19176, 19177, 19178, 19179, 19180, 19181, 19182
  6. Texas Tripe Chicken Blend: 19148, 19149, 19150, 19151, 19152, 19153, 19154, 19155, 19156, 19157, 19158, 19159, 19160, 19161, 19162, 19163, 19164, 19165, 19166, 19167, 19168, 19169, 19170, 19171, 19172, 19173, 19174, 19175, 19176, 19177, 19178, 19179, 19180, 19181, 19182
  7. Texas Tripe Green Tripe: 19148, 19149, 19150, 19151, 19152, 19153, 19154, 19155, 19156, 19157, 19158, 19159, 19160, 19161, 19162, 19163, 19164, 19165, 19166, 19167, 19168, 19169, 19170, 19171, 19172, 19173, 19174, 19175, 19176, 19177, 19178, 19179, 19180, 19181, 19182
  8. Texas Tripe Phat Katz: 19148, 19149, 19150, 19151, 19152, 19153, 19154, 19155, 19156, 19157, 19158, 19159, 19160, 19161, 19162, 19163, 19164, 19165, 19166, 19167, 19168, 19169, 19170, 19171, 19172, 19173, 19174, 19175, 19176, 19177, 19178, 19179, 19180, 19181, 19182
  9. Texas Tripe Senior Pro: 19148, 19149, 19150, 19151, 19152, 19153, 19154, 19155, 19156, 19157, 19158, 19159, 19160, 19161, 19162, 19163, 19164, 19165, 19166, 19167, 19168, 19169, 19170, 19171, 19172, 19173, 19174, 19175, 19176, 19177, 19178, 19179, 19180, 19181, 19182
  10. Texas Tripe All-Star Bully Blend: 19148, 19149, 19150, 19151, 19152, 19153, 19154, 19155, 19156, 19157, 19158, 19159, 19160, 19161, 19162, 19163, 19164, 19165, 19166, 19167, 19168, 19169, 19170, 19171, 19172, 19173, 19174, 19175, 19176, 19177, 19178, 19179, 19180, 19181, 19182
  11. Texas Tripe Beef Blend: 19148, 19149, 19150, 19151, 19152, 19153, 19154, 19155, 19156, 19157, 19158, 19159, 19160, 19161, 19162, 19163, 19164, 19165, 19166, 19167, 19168, 19169, 19170, 19171, 19172, 19173, 19174, 19175, 19176, 19177, 19178, 19179, 19180, 19181, 19182
  12. Texas Tripe Duck-Rabbit: 19148, 19149, 19150, 19151, 19152, 19153, 19154, 19155, 19156, 19157, 19158, 19159, 19160, 19161, 19162, 19163, 19164, 19165, 19166, 19167, 19168, 19169, 19170, 19171, 19172, 19173, 19174, 19175, 19176, 19177, 19178, 19179, 19180, 19181, 19182
  13. Texas Tripe Goat Tripe Complete: 19148, 19149, 19150, 19151, 19152, 19153, 19154, 19155, 19156, 19157, 19158, 19159, 19160, 19161, 19162, 19163, 19164, 19165, 19166, 19167, 19168, 19169, 19170, 19171, 19172, 19173, 19174, 19175, 19176, 19177, 19178, 19179, 19180, 19181, 19182
  14. Texas Tripe Boneless Chicken Blend: 19148, 19149, 19150, 19151, 19152, 19153, 19154, 19155, 19156, 19157, 19158, 19159, 19160, 19161, 19162, 19163, 19164, 19165, 19166, 19167, 19168, 19169, 19170, 19171, 19172, 19173, 19174, 19175, 19176, 19177, 19178, 19179, 19180, 19181, 19182
  15. Texas Tripe Turkey Pork Blend: 19148, 19149, 19150, 19151, 19152, 19153, 19154, 19155, 19156, 19157, 19158, 19159, 19160, 19161, 19162, 19163, 19164, 19165, 19166, 19167, 19168, 19169, 19170, 19171, 19172, 19173, 19174, 19175, 19176, 19177, 19178, 19179, 19180, 19181, 19182
  16. Texas Tripe Beef Tripe and Ground Rabbit: 19148, 19149, 19150, 19151, 19152, 19153, 19154, 19155, 19156, 19157, 19158, 19159, 19160, 19161, 19162, 19163, 19164, 19165, 19166, 19167, 19168, 19169, 19170, 19171, 19172, 19173, 19174, 19175, 19176, 19177, 19178, 19179, 19180, 19181, 19182
  17. Texas Tripe Boneless Beef Blend: 19148, 19149, 19150, 19151, 19152, 19153, 19154, 19155, 19156, 19157, 19158, 19159, 19160, 19161, 19162, 19163, 19164, 19165, 19166, 19167, 19168, 19169, 19170, 19171, 19172, 19173, 19174, 19175, 19176, 19177, 19178, 19179, 19180, 19181, 19182
  18. Texas Tripe Coarse Ground Beef with Bone: 19148, 19149, 19150, 19151, 19152, 19153, 19154, 19155, 19156, 19157, 19158, 19159, 19160, 19161, 19162, 19163, 19164, 19165, 19166, 19167, 19168, 19169, 19170, 19171, 19172, 19173, 19174, 19175, 19176, 19177, 19178, 19179, 19180, 19181, 19182
  19. Texas Tripe Wolf Run Plus: 19148, 19149, 19150, 19151, 19152, 19153, 19154, 19155, 19156, 19157, 19158, 19159, 19160, 19161, 19162, 19163, 19164, 19165, 19166, 19167, 19168, 19169, 19170, 19171, 19172, 19173, 19174, 19175, 19176, 19177, 19178, 19179, 19180, 19181, 19182
  20. Texas Tripe Turkey Blend: 19148, 19149, 19150, 19151, 19152, 19153, 19154, 19155, 19156, 19157, 19158, 19159, 19160, 19161, 19162, 19163, 19164, 19165, 19166, 19167, 19168, 19169, 19170, 19171, 19172, 19173, 19174, 19175, 19176, 19177, 19178, 19179, 19180, 19181, 19182
  21. Texas Tripe Pork Blend: 19148, 19149, 19150, 19151, 19152, 19153, 19154, 19155, 19156, 19157, 19158, 19159, 19160, 19161, 19162, 19163, 19164, 19165, 19166, 19167, 19168, 19169, 19170, 19171, 19172, 19173, 19174, 19175, 19176, 19177, 19178, 19179, 19180, 19181, 19182
  22. Texas Tripe Beginners Choice: 19148, 19149, 19150, 19151, 19152, 19153, 19154, 19155, 19156, 19157, 19158, 19159, 19160, 19161, 19162, 19163, 19164, 19165, 19166, 19167, 19168, 19169, 19170, 19171, 19172, 19173, 19174, 19175, 19176, 19177, 19178, 19179, 19180, 19181, 19182
  23. Texas Tripe Wolf Run: 19148, 19149, 19150, 19151, 19152, 19153, 19154, 19155, 19156, 19157, 19158, 19159, 19160, 19161, 19162, 19163, 19164, 19165, 19166, 19167, 19168, 19169, 19170, 19171, 19172, 19173, 19174, 19175, 19176, 19177, 19178, 19179, 19180, 19181, 19182

The recalled products were sold directly to consumers in Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Michigan, Mississippi, Missouri, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Texas and Virginia.

What to do

Customers who purchased the recalled products should stop feeding it to their pets and discard it in a secure container where other animals, including wildlife, cannot access it.

Consumers with questions may call (903) 674-8042

Texas Tripe is recalling 35 lots for each of 23 varieties of raw pet food.The products may be contaminated with Salmonella and/or Listeria monocytogene...

Article Image

Dog Goods USA recalls Chef Toby Pig Ears Treats

Dog Goods USA is recalling Chef Toby Pig Ears Treats.

The Food and Drug Administration , the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and State partners are investigating a suspected link between pig ear pet treats and human cases of salmonellosis.

No illnesses have been linked to the products to date.

The lot codes of the non-irradiated bulk and packaged pig ears branded Chef Toby Pig Ears are:

  • 428590, 278989, 087148, 224208, 1168723, 428590, 222999, 074599, 1124053, 226884, 578867, 224897, 1234750, 444525, 1106709, 215812, 230273, 224970, 585246, 327901, 052248, 210393, 217664, 331199, 225399, 867680, 050273, 881224, 424223, 225979, 431724, 226340, 880207, 334498

What to do

Customers who purchased the recalled products should return them to the place of purchase for a full refund.

Consumers with questions may call (786) 401 -6533 ex:8000 from 9am through 5pm (EST).

Dog Goods USA is recalling Chef Toby Pig Ears Treats.The Food and Drug Administration , the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and State partne...

Article Image

Lennox Intl recalls Natural Pig Ears

Lennox Intl of Edison N.J., is recalling Natural Pig Ears that may be contaminated with Salmonella.

The firm says it is aware of two cases in which pig ears caused dog illnesses.

The recalled product comes in an 8 PK branded pouch under UPC 742174 995163, 742174994166 or packaged individually shrinked wrapped under UPC 0385384810, and 742174P35107. UPC codes are on the front label of the package.

It was shipped to distributors and/or retail stores nationwide from May 1 – July 3, 2019.

What to do

Customers who purchased the recalled product and have proper receipt may return to the place of purchase.

Consumers may contact the company at (800) 5388980 Monday – Friday from 9AM – 5 PM or by email at usaoffice@lennoxpets.com for refund and additional information.

Lennox Intl of Edison N.J., is recalling Natural Pig Ears that may be contaminated with Salmonella.The firm says it is aware of two cases in which pig...

Article Image

Pet Supplies Plus recalls bulk pig ear treats

Pet Supplies Plus is recalling bulk pig ear treats following the announcement that the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) are investigating contaminated pig ear treats connected to Salmonella.

While 45 individuals in 13 states have been diagnosed with Salmonella-related illness, none are confirmed to be a result of purchasing pig ears from Pet Supplies Plus.

The recalled products, which are stocked in open bins, were distributed to Pet Supplies Plus stores in Alabama, Arkansas, California. Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Iowa, Illinois, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Massachusetts, Maryland, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, North Carolina, Nebraska, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia, Wisconsin and West Virginia.

What to do

Customers who purchased the recalled products should discontinue using and discard them.

Consumers with questions may call (734) 793- 6564 Monday though Friday 9 a.m. - 4 p.m. (EST) excluding holidays.

Pet Supplies Plus is recalling bulk pig ear treats following the announcement that the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the Centers for Disease Contr...

Article Image

Central Aquatics recalls Aqueon Betta Food

Central Aquatics of Franklin, Wis., is recalling 96 cases of Aqueon Betta Food.

The product may be contaminated with Salmonella.

Fish with Salmonella infections are not well documented and fish carrying salmonella typically do not show any signs of disease.

No illnesses have been reported to-date.

The recalled product is sold only in a 0.95-oz plastic jar with the expiration dates of EX04JUN22 and EX05JUN22, item number 100106051, UPC Code 0 15905 06051 6, and manufacturing dates of 06/04/2019 and 06/05, 2019.

It was shipped to Georgia, Illinois, New Jersey and Pennsylvania via distribution centers.

What to do

Customers who purchased the recalled product may return it to the place of purchase for a full refund.

Consumers with questions may contact Central Aquatics at (888) 255-4527.

Central Aquatics of Franklin, Wis., is recalling 96 cases of Aqueon Betta Food.The product may be contaminated with Salmonella.Fish with Salmonella...

Article Image

Nestle Purina PetCare recalls Muse wet cat food Natural Chicken Recipe in Gravy

Nestlé Purina PetCare Company is recalling a limited amount of Muse wet cat food Natural Chicken Recipe in Gravy.

The product may contain pieces of rubber that are translucent yellow with a blue backing, which may present a potential choking hazard.

The are no reports to date of injury or illness to cats fed this product.

The following item, sold nationwide at pet specialty and e-commerce retailers, is being recalled:

UPC CodesBest byProduction Code
(*First 8 characters equal to)
38100 17199 (single three-ounce can)APR202080941162

What to do

Customers who purchased the recalled product should discard it.

Consumers with questions may contact the company at (800) 982-3885, 24/7.

Nestlé Purina PetCare Company is recalling a limited amount of Muse wet cat food Natural Chicken Recipe in Gravy.The product may contain pieces of rubb...

Article Image

Hill’s Pet Nutrition dog food recall

Hill’s Pet Nutrition is expanding its earlier recall of canned dog food.

The products contain elevated levels of vitamin D, which can lead to potential health issues depending on the level of vitamin D and the length of exposure. Dogs may exhibit symptoms such as vomiting, loss of appetite, increased thirst, increased urination, excessive drooling, and weight loss.

In most cases, complete recovery is expected after discontinuation of feeding.

Hill’s has received a limited number of reports of pet illness related to some of the recalled products.

The following products, sold through retail pet stores and veterinary clinics nationwide, are being recalled:

Items marked with a * are new products that were added to the list on March 20, 2019.

Product NameSKU NumberDate Code / Lot Code
*Hill's Prescription Diet k/d Kidney Care with Lamb Canned Dog Food, 13oz, 12-pack*2697*102020T25
*Hill's Science Diet Adult Perfect Weight Chicken & Vegetable Entrée dog food 12 x 12.8oz cans*2975*092020T28
*Hill's Prescription Diet c/d Multicare Urinary Care Chicken & Vegetable Stew Canned Dog Food, 5.5oz, 24-pack*3388*102020T18
*Hill's Prescription Diet i/d Low Fat Canine Rice, Vegetable & Chicken Stew 24 x 5.5oz cans*3391*092020T27
*Hill's Prescription Diet r/d Canine 12 x 12.3oz cans*7014*092020T28
*102020T27
*102020T28
*Hill's Science Diet Adult Beef & Barley Entrée Canned Dog Food, 13oz, 12-pack*7039*092020T31
*102020T21
*Hill's Science Diet Adult 7+ Healthy Cuisine Roasted Chicken, Carrots & Spinach Stew dog food 12 x 12.5oz cans*10449*092020T28
*Hill's® Science Diet Healthy Cuisine Adult Braised Beef, Carrots & Peas Stew Canned Dog Food, 12.5oz, 12-pack*10451*102020T28
Hill's Prescription Diet c/d Multicare Urinary Care Chicken & Vegetable Stew Canned Dog Food, 12.5 oz, 12-pack3384*092020T29
102020T10
102020T25
Hill's Prescription Diet i/d Digestive Care Chicken & Vegetable Stew Canned Dog Food, 12.5 oz, 12-pack3389*092020T28
*102020T24
*102020T25
102020T04
102020T10
102020T19
102020T20
Hill's Prescription Diet i/d Canine Chicken & Vegetable Stew 5.5oz3390102020T11
112020T23
122020T07
Hill's Prescription Diet g/d Aging Care Turkey Flavor Canned Dog Food, 13 oz, 12-pack7006*092020T22
112020T19
112020T20
Hill's Prescription Diet i/d Digestive Care with Turkey Canned Dog Food, 13 oz, 12-pack7008*092020T21
092020T30
102020T07
102020T11
112020T22
112020T23
Hill's Prescription Diet w/d Digestive/Weight/Glucose Management with Chicken Canned Dog Food, 13 oz, 12-pack7017*102020T24
*102020T25
*112020T09
*112020T10
092020T30
102020T11
102020T12
Hill's Science Diet Adult Chicken & Barley Entrée Canned Dog Food, 13 oz, 12-pack7037*092020T22
102020T13
102020T14
112020T23
112020T24
Hill's Science Diet Adult Chicken & Beef Entrée Canned Dog Food, 13 oz, 12-pack7040*112020T10
*112020T11
102020T13
Hill's Science Diet Adult 7+ Beef & Barley Entrée Canned Dog Food, 13 oz, 12-pack7056*102020T28
092020T31
112020T20
112020T24
Hill's Prescription Diet w/d Digestive/Weight/Glucose Management Vegetable & Chicken Stew Canned Dog Food, 12.5 oz, 12-pack10129*112020T11
*112020T05
102020T04
102020T21
Hill's Prescription Diet i/d Low Fat Digestive Care Rice, Vegetable & Chicken Stew Canned Dog Food, 12.5 oz, 12-pack10423*092020T27
*092020T28
*092020T24
102020T17
102020T19
112020T04
Hill's Science Diet Healthy Cuisine Adult 7+ Braised Beef, Carrots & Peas Stew Canned Dog Food, 12.5 oz, 12-pack10452*102020T28
102020T14
102020T21
Hill's Prescription Diet z/d Canine 5.5 oz5403102020T17
112020T22
Hill's Prescription Diet j/d Canine 13 oz7009112020T20
Hill’s Prescription Diet k/d Canine 13 oz7010102020T10
102020T11
Hill’s Prescription Diet z/d Canine 13 oz7018102020T04
112020T22
Hill’s Prescription Diet Metabolic + Mobility Canine Vegetable & Tuna Stew 12.5 oz10086102020T05
102020T26
Hill’s Prescription Diet Derm Defense Canine Chicken & Vegetable Stew 12.5 oz10509102020T05
Hill’s Science Diet Adult 7+ Small & toy Breed Chicken & Barley Entrée Dog Food 5.8 oz4969102020T18
Hill’s Science Diet Puppy Chicken & Barley Entrée 13 oz7036102020T12
Hill's Science Diet Adult Turkey & Barley Dog Food 13oz7038102020T06
Hill's Science Diet Adult Light with Liver Dog Food 13oz7048112020T19
Hill's Science Diet Adult 7+ Chicken & Barley Entrée Dog Food 13oz7055092020T31
102020T13
Hill's Science Diet® Adult 7+ Turkey & Barley Entrée 13oz7057112020T19
Hill's Science Diet Adult 7+ Youthful Vitality Chicken & Vegetable Stew dog food 12.5oz10763102020T04
102020T05
112020T11

What to do

Customers who purchased the recalled products should discontinue feeding and dispose of them immediately or return the unopened product to the place of purchase for a refund.

Consumers may contact Hill’s Pet Nutrition at (800) 445-5777 daily from 7am – 7pm (CST), by email at contactus@hillspet.com, or online at www.hillspet.com/productlist

Hill’s Pet Nutrition is expanding its earlier recall of canned dog food.The products contain elevated levels of vitamin D, which can lead to potential...

Article Image

Birdseed Food recalls Craft Granola Goldenola: Turmeric & Ginger

Birdseed Food Co., of Bend, Ore., is recalling Craft Granola Goldenola: Turmeric & Ginger.

The product contains cashews, an allergen not declared on the label.

No illnesses have been reported to date.

The recalled product was sold from October 3, 2018 – February 7, 2019, in California, Connecticut, Maryland, New York Oregon and Pennsylvania at retail stores (https://www.birdseedfoodco.com/pages/where-to-find) and online at https://www.birdseedfoodco.com/collections/all, https://getintothebubble.com/, and https://www.farmtopeople.com/.

It comes in 3-oz., and 11-oz., yellow bags with all expiration dates and includes up to 061419.

What to do

Customers who purchased the recalled product and are allergic to cashews should not consume it.

Consumers desiring a product replacement or further information, may contact Ashley at (541) 788-6352.

Birdseed Food Co., of Bend, Ore., is recalling Craft Granola Goldenola: Turmeric & Ginger.The product contains cashews, an allergen not declared on the...

Article Image

Hill’s Pet Nutrition recalls canned dog food

Hill’s Pet Nutrition is recalling canned dog food products that may have elevated levels of vitamin D.

Ingestion of elevated levels of vitamin D can lead to potential health issues with dogs exhibiting symptoms such as vomiting, loss of appetite, increased thirst, increased urination, excessive drooling, and weight loss.

In most cases, complete recovery is expected after discontinuation of feeding.

The following products, distributed through retail pet stores and veterinary clinics nationwide, are being recalled:

Product NameSKU NumberLot Code/Date Code
Hill's® Prescription Diet® c/d® Multicare Canine Chicken & Vegetable Stew 12.5oz3384102020T10
102020T25
Hill's® Prescription Diet® i/d® Canine Chicken & Vegetable Stew 12.5oz3389102020T04
102020T10
102020T19
102020T20
Hill's® Prescription Diet® i/d® Canine Chicken & Vegetable Stew 5.5oz3390102020T11
112020T23
122020T07
Hill's® Prescription Diet® z/d® Canine 5.5oz5403102020T17
112020T22
Hill's® Prescription Diet® g/d® Canine 13oz7006112020T19
112020T20
Hill's® Prescription Diet® i/d® Canine 13oz7008092020T30
102020T07
102020T11
112020T22
112020T23
Hill's® Prescription Diet® j/d® Canine 13oz7009112020T20
Hill's® Prescription Diet® k/d® Canine 13oz7010102020T10
102020T11
Hill's® Prescription Diet® w/d® Canine 13oz7017092020T30
102020T11
102020T12
Hill's® Prescription Diet® z/d® Canine 13oz7018102020T04
112020T22
Hill's® Prescription Diet® Metabolic + Mobility Canine Vegetable & Tuna Stew 12.5oz10086102020T05
102020T26
Hill's® Prescription Diet® w/d® Canine Vegetable & Chicken Stew 12.5oz10129102020T04
102020T21
Hill's® Prescription Diet® i/d® Low Fat Canine Rice, Vegetable & Chicken Stew 12.5oz10423102020T17
102020T19
112020T04
Hill's® Prescription Diet® Derm Defense® Canine Chicken & Vegetable Stew 12.5oz10509102020T05
Hill's® Science Diet® Adult 7+ Small & Toy Breed Chicken & Barley Entrée Dog Food 5.8oz4969102020T18
Hill's® Science Diet® Puppy Chicken & Barley Entrée 13oz7036102020T12
Hill's® Science Diet® Adult Chicken & Barley Entrée Dog Food 13oz7037102020T13
102020T14
112020T23
112020T24
Hill's® Science Diet® Adult Turkey & Barley Dog Food 13oz7038102020T06
Hill's® Science Diet® Adult Chicken & Beef Entrée Dog Food 13oz7040102020T13
Hill's® Science Diet® Adult Light with Liver Dog Food 13oz7048112020T19
Hill's® Science Diet® Adult 7+ Chicken & Barley Entrée Dog Food 13oz7055092020T31
102020T13
Hill's® Science Diet® Adult 7+ Beef & Barley Entrée Dog Food 13oz7056092020T31
112020T20
112020T24
Hill's® Science Diet® Adult 7+ Turkey & Barley Entrée 13oz7057112020T19
Hill's® Science Diet® Adult 7+ Healthy Cuisine Braised Beef, Carrots & Peas Stew dog food 12.5oz10452102020T14
102020T21
Hill's® Science Diet® Adult 7+ Youthful Vitality Chicken & Vegetable Stew dog food 12.5oz10763102020T04
102020T05
112020T11

What to do

Customers who purchased the recalled products should discontinue feeding and dispose of them or return the unopened products to the place of purchase for a refund.

Consumers with questions may contact Hill’s at (800) 445-5777 Monday-Friday from 9am – 5pm (CST), by email at contactus@hillspet.com or online at www.hillspet.com/productlist.

Hill’s Pet Nutrition is recalling canned dog food products that may have elevated levels of vitamin D.Ingestion of elevated levels of vitamin D can lea...

Article Image

Abound Chicken and Brown Rice dog food recalled

King Soopers is recalling Abound Chicken & Brown Rice Recipe dog food produced by Sunshine Mills, Inc.

The products have the potential to contain an elevated level of Vitamin D, which may cause renal failure.

No reports of illness or injury have been reported to date.

The following products, sold in King Soopers and City Market stores in Colorado, Utah, New Mexico and Wyoming, are being recalled:

ProductUPCBest by DatesSize

Abound Chicken and

Brown Rice Recipe Dog Food

11110-83556

11/1/18

11/16/18

4 LB

Abound Chicken and

Brown Rice Recipe Dog Food

11110-8357311/1/18

11/16/18
14 LB

Abound Chicken and

Brown Rice Recipe Dog Food

11110-8907611/1/18

11/16/18
24 LB

What to do

Customers who purchased the recalled products should not allow their pet to consume them, and should return them to the store where purchased for a full refund or replacement.

Consumers with questions may contact Sunshine Mills. customer service at (800) 705-2111 from 7 a.m. – 4 p.m. (CST) Monday through Friday, or by email at customer.service@sunshinemills.com.

King Soopers is recalling Abound Chicken & Brown Rice Recipe dog food produced by Sunshine Mills, Inc.The products have the potential to contain an ele...

Article Image

Columbia River recalls Cow Pie and Chicken & Vegetables fresh frozen meats for dogs and cats

Columbia River Natural Pet Foods of Vancouver, Wash., is recalling 1,191 packages of Cow Pie and 82 packages of Chicken & Vegetables fresh frozen meats for dogs and cats.

The products may be contaminated with Salmonella and Listeria monocytogenes.

No illnesses have been reported to date.

Salmonella and Listeria monocytogenes can affect animals eating the products and there is risk to humans from handling contaminated pet products, especially if they have not thoroughly washed their hands after having contact with the products or any surfaces exposed to these products.

Cow Pie and Chicken & Vegetables are fresh frozen meat products intended to feed raw to dogs and cats. The Cow Pie product comes in frozen 2-lbs. purple and white plastic bags with the lot number found on an orange sticker. The Chicken & Vegetables product comes in frozen 2-lbs. turquoise and white plastic bags with Lot # 111518 found on an orange sticker.

Both products were distributed in Alaska, Oregon and Washington through retail stores and direct delivery.

What to do

Customers who purchased the recalled products should discontinue use of them and return them for a full refund or exchange by bringing the product in its original packaging to place of purchase.

Consumers with questions may contact the company at (360) 834-6854 Monday – Friday from 8am-4pm (PST).

Columbia River Natural Pet Foods of Vancouver, Wash., is recalling 1,191 packages of Cow Pie and 82 packages of Chicken & Vegetables fresh frozen meats for...

Article Image

9Lives Protein Plus Wet, Canned Cat Food recalled

The J.M. Smucker Company is recalling 9Lives Protein Plus wet, canned cat food.

The product may contain low levels of thiamine (Vitamin B1).

No illnesses have been reported to date.

The following products, distributed to a variety of retailers nationwide, are being recalled:

Product NameUPC CodeProduct SizeBest if Used By Date
9Lives® Protein Plus® With Tuna & Chicken79100215494 pack of cans,
5.5 oz each
Mar. 27, 2020- Nov.14, 2020
9Lives® Protein Plus® With Tuna & Liver79100217484 pack of cans,
5.5 oz each
Apr. 17, 2020 - Sept.14, 2020

What to do

Customers who purchased the recalled products should stop feeding them to their cats and dispose of them.

Consumers with questions or who would like to receive a refund or coupon for replacement product, should email the company by completing this form or calling (888) 569-6828, Monday through Friday, from 8:00 AM – 6:00 PM (ET).

The J.M. Smucker Company is recalling 9Lives Protein Plus wet, canned cat food.The product may contain low levels of thiamine (Vitamin B1).No illne...

Article Image

ELM Pet Foods recalls dry dog food

ELM Pet Foods is recalling Elm Chicken and Chickpea Recipe dog food that may contain elevated levels of Vitamin D, which when consumed at very high levels, can lead to serious health issues in dogs including renal dysfunction.

Symptoms include vomiting, loss of appetite, increased thirst, increased urination, excessive drooling and weight loss.

The following items, with multiple UPC codes manufactured between February 25, 2018, and October 31, 2018, are being recalled:

  • 3lb ELM CHICKEN AND CHICKPEA RECIPE - UPC (0-70155-22507-8) TD2 26 FEB 2019; TE1 30 APR 2019; TD1 5 SEP 2019; TD2 5 SEP 2019
  • 28lb ELM CHICKEN AND CHICKPEA RECIPE - UPC (0-70155-22513-9) TB3 6 APR 2019; TA1 2 JULY 2019; TI1 2 JULY 2019
  • 40lb ELM K9 NATURALS CHICKEN RECIPE – UPC (0-70155-22522-9) TB3 14 Sep 2019; TA2 22 Sep 2019; TB2 11 Oct 2019

The recalled products were distributed in Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Delaware and Maryland. NJ, DE, MD.

What to do

Customers who purchased the recalled products should stop feeding them, dispose of them or return them to the retailer for a full refund.

Consumers with questions may contact ELM Pet Foods at (800) 705-2111 8am-5pm (EST) Monday – Friday, or by email at customerservice@elmpetfoods.com.

ELM Pet Foods is recalling Elm Chicken and Chickpea Recipe dog food that may contain elevated levels of Vitamin D, which when consumed at very high levels,...

Article Image

ANF Pet recalls dry dog food

ANF is recalling select products of ANF Pet Lamb and Rice Dog Food.

The product may contain elevated levels of Vitamin D which, when consumed at very high levels, can lead to serious health issues in dogs including renal dysfunction.

Symptoms include vomiting, loss of appetite, increased thirst, increased urination, excessive drooling and weight loss.

The following products, sold in retail stores within Puerto Rico, are being recalled:

  • 3 Kg ANF Lamb and Rice Dry Dog Food Bag UPC: 9097231622 BB NOV 23 2019
  • 7.5 Kg ANF Lamb and Rice Dry Dog Food Bag UPC: 9097203300 BB NOV 20 2019

What to do

Customers who purchased the recalled product should stop feeding it and dispose of it or return it to the retailer for a full refund.

Consumers with questions may contact ANF customer service at (936) 560-5930 from 8AM – 5PM (CT) Monday through Friday, or by email at mwhite@anf.com.

ANF is recalling select products of ANF Pet Lamb and Rice Dog Food.The product may contain elevated levels of Vitamin D which, when consumed at very hi...

Article Image

Sunshine Mills recalls dry dog food

Sunshine Mills is recalling Evolve Puppy, Sportsman’s Pride Large Breed Puppy and Triumph Chicken and Rice Dog Food.

The products may contain elevated levels of Vitamin D which, when consumed at very high levels, can lead to serious health issues in dogs including renal dysfunction.

Symptoms include vomiting, loss of appetite, increased thirst, increased urination, excessive drooling, and weight loss.

The following products with a Best Buy Date Code of November 1, 2018, through November 8, 2019, on the back of each bag, are being recalled:

  • 14 LB Evolve Chicken & Rice Puppy Dry Dog Food Bag UPC: 0-73657-00862-0
  • 28 LB Evolve Chicken & Rice Puppy Dry Dog Food Bag UPC: 0-73657-00863-7
  • 40 LB Sportsman's Pride Large Breed Puppy Dry Dog Food Bag UPC: 0-70155-10566-0
  • 40 LB Sportsman's Pride Large Breed Puppy Dry Dog Food Bag UPC: 0-70155-10564-0
  • 3.5 LB Triumph Chicken & Rice Recipe Dry Dog Food Bag UPC: 0-73657-00873-6
  • 16 LB Triumph Chicken & Rice Recipe Dry Dog Food Bag UPC: 0-73657-00874-3
  • 30 LB Triumph Chicken & Rice Recipe Dry Dog Food Bag UPC 0-73657-00875-0

The recalled products were distributed in retail stores within the U.S., as well as some export distributors in Japan, Puerto Rico, Colombia, Israel, Canada and South Korea.

What to do

Customers who purchased the recalled products should dispose of them or return them to the retailer for a full refund.

Consumers with questions may contact Sunshine Mills customer service at (800) 705-2111 from 7AM – 4PM (CT Monday through Friday, or by email at customer.service@sunshinemills.com.

Sunshine Mills is recalling Evolve Puppy, Sportsman’s Pride Large Breed Puppy and Triumph Chicken and Rice Dog Food.The products may contain elevated l...

Article Image

Natural Life Pet Products recall dry dog food

Natural Life Pet Products is recalling Natural Life Chicken & Potato dry dog food.

The product contains elevated levels of Vitamin D.

The company has received complaints from three pet owners of vitamin D toxicity.

The following product, with a Best By Date code of December 4, 2019, through August 10, 2020, on the back or bottom of each bag, is being recalled:

  • 17.5 # Natural Life Chicken & Potato Dry Dog Food Bag UPC: 0-12344-08175-1

The recalled product was sold in retail stores in Georgia, Florida, Alabama, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee, Virginia and California.

What to do

Consumers should stop feeding the recalled product and dispose of it or return it to the place of purchase for a full refund.

Consumers with questions may contact Natural Life Pet Products at (888) 279-9420 from 8 AM to 5 PM (CST) Monday through Friday, or by email at consumerservices@nutrisca.com for more information.

Natural Life Pet Products is recalling Natural Life Chicken & Potato dry dog food.The product contains elevated levels of Vitamin D.The company has...

Article Image

Nutrisca recalls dry dog food


Nutrisca of Saint Louis, Mo., is recalling one formula of Nutrisca dry dog food.

The products contain elevated levels of Vitamin D.

When consumed at very high levels, Vitamin D can lead to serious health issues in dogs including renal dysfunction.

The following products, with a Best By Date code of February 25, 2020, through September 13, 2020, on the back or bottom of the bag, are being recalled:

4 lbs Nutrisca® Chicken and Chickpea Dry Dog FoodBag UPC: 8-84244-12495-7
15 lbs Nutrisca® Chicken and Chickpea Dry Dog FoodBag UPC: 8-84244-12795-8
28 lbs Nutrisca® Chicken and Chickpea Dry Dog FoodBag UPC: 8-84244-12895-5

The recalled products were distributed to retail stores natiowide.

What to do

Customers who purchased the recalled products should stop feeding them and dispose of them or return them to the place of purchase for a full refund.

Consumers with questions may contact Nutrisca at (888) 279-9420 from 8 AM to 5 PM (CST) Monday through Friday, or by email at consumerservices@nutrisca.com for more information.

Natural Life Pet Products of Saint Louis, Mo., is recalling its Chicken & Potato dry dog food.The product contains elevated levels of Vitamin D.Whe...

Article Image

Bravo Packing recalls Performance Dog raw pet food

Bravo Packing of Carneys Point, N.J., is recalling all Performance Dog products, a frozen raw pet food.

The products may be contaminated with Salmonella.

No human or animal illnesses have been reported to date.

The recalled products come frozen in 2-pound and 5-pound plastic sleeves with the manufacture date code 071418 printed on the boxes that contain the plastic sleeves, but not on the individual plastic sleeves.

Therefore, if the cardboard box has been discarded, there are no unique identification numbers on the individual sleeves that allow customers to determine that they possess the recalled products.

What to do

If customers purchased these product since July 14, 2018, and cannot determine whether it is affected by the recall, they should discard the product

Consumers with questions may contact Bravo Packing at (856) 299-1044 Monday – Friday from 6:00AM-2:00PM, and on Saturday from 4:00AM-9:00AM EST) or online at www.bravopacking.com.

Bravo Packing of Carneys Point, N.J., is recalling all Performance Dog products, a frozen raw pet food.The products may be contaminated with Salmonella...

Article Image

Radagast Pet Food expands cat food recall

Radagast Pet Food of Portland, Ore., is expanding its earlier recall to include an additional quantity of Rad Cat Raw Diet across all varieties with Best By dates of 10/19/18 through 12/3/19.

The products may be contaminated with Listeria monocytogenes.

No pet or human illnesses caused by consumption of or exposure to the recalled products have been reported to date.

The following products, which were shipped to distributors in the U.S. and Canada between May 10, 2017, and August 9, 2018, are being recalled:

  • Rad Cat Raw Diet Grass-Fed Beef Recipe (1oz sample, 8oz, 16oz, 24oz)
  • Rad Cat Raw Diet Free-Range Chicken Recipe (1oz sample, 8oz, 16oz, 24oz)
  • Rad Cat Raw Diet Pasture-Raised Lamb Recipe (1oz sample, 8oz, 16oz, 24oz)
  • Rad Cat Raw Diet Natural Pork Recipe (1oz sample, 8oz, 16oz, 24oz)
  • Rad Cat Raw Diet Free-Range Turkey Recipe (1oz sample, 8oz, 16oz, 24oz)
  • Rad Cat Raw Diet Pasture-Raised Venison Recipe (1oz sample, 8oz, 16oz, 24oz)

The recall includes products starting with and including lot number 62763, through and including lot number 63101. The Lot Number and BB Date can be found on the bottom of each container.

What to do

Customers who purchased the recalled products should check the lot codes on their containers and return them to the specialty retailer where purchased for a full refund.

Consumers with questions may contact Radagast Pet Food (877) 567-3001 Monday - Friday from 9:00am - 5:00pm (PT).

Radagast Pet Food of Portland, Ore., is expanding its earlier recall to include an additional quantity of Rad Cat Raw Diet across all varieties with Best B...

Article Image

G & C Raw recalls Pat's Cat Turkey, and Ground Lamb Pet Food

G & C Raw of Versailles, Ohio, is recalling 30 1–lb. containers of Pat's Cat Turkey Cat Food and 40 2-lb. containers of Ground Lamb Dog Food.

The product may be contaminated with Listeria monocytogenes.

No illnesses have been reported to date.

Pat's Cat Turkey comes in 1-lb. clear plastic containers with the lot number WWPKTF051618. The Ground Lamb comes in a 2-lb. plastic container with the Lot number MFF022718. The Lot number codes are listed on the bottom right corner of the label.

The recalled products were distributed by G & C Raw through direct delivery in Ohio, Michigan, Indiana, Pennsylvania, Kentucky, North Carolina and Georgia

What to do

Customers who purchased the recalled products should return them to G & C Raw, 225 N. West Street, Versailles, Ohio, for a full refund.

Consumers with questions may contact the company at (937) 827 0010 or by email at gcrawdogfood@yahoo.com.

G & C Raw of Versailles, Ohio, is recalling 30 1–lb. containers of Pat's Cat Turkey Cat Food and 40 2-lb. containers of Ground Lamb Dog Food.The produc...

Article Image

Radagast Pet Food recalls Rad Cat Raw Diet cat food

Radagast Pet Food of Portland, Ore., is recalling three lots of Rad Cat Raw Diet Free-Range Chicken Recipe that maybe contaminated with Listeria monocytogenes.

Also being recalled is one lot of Rad Cat Raw Diet Pasture-Raised Venison Recipe that may be contaminated with Shiga Toxin producing E. coli O121.

No pet or human illnesses have been reported.

The following three lots of Rad Cat Raw Diet Free-Range Chicken Recipe, shipped to distributors nationwide in May and June 2018, are being recalled:

  • Lot Code 63057, Best By Date: 10/9/2019
  • Lot Code 63069, Best By Date: 10/23/2019*
  • Lot Code 63076, Best By Date: 10/31/2019*

(8-oz. UPC 8 51536 00103 6, 16-oz. UPC 8 51536 00104 3, 24-oz. UPC 8 51536 00105 0)

*These two lots were shipped to one distributor in Vancouver, BC, Canada in addition to U.S. distributors in May and June, 2018.

The following single lot of Rad Cat Raw Diet Pasture-Raised Venison Recipe, shipped to distributors nationwide only in May and June, is being recalled:

  • Lot Code 63063, Best By Date: 10/15/2019

(8-oz. UPC 8 51536 00121 0, 16-oz. UPC 8 51536 00122 7, 24-oz. UPC 8 51536 00123 4 and 1-oz. Samples)

What to do

Customers should check the lot codes printed on the bottom of the plastic containers and return any recalled products to the specialty retailer where purchased for a full refund.

Consumers with questions may contact Radagast Pet Food at (503) 736-4649 Monday – Friday, 9:00am – 5:00pm (PT) or online at www.RadFood.com.

Radagast Pet Food of Portland, Ore., is recalling three lots of Rad Cat Raw Diet Free-Range Chicken Recipe that maybe contaminated with Listeria monocytoge...

Article Image

Dave’s Pet Food recalls 95% Premium Beef Canned Dog Food

Dave’s Pet Food of Agawam, Mass., is recalling a single lot of Dave’s Dog Food 95% premium beef cans that may contain elevated levels of beef thyroid hormone.

Dogs consuming high levels of beef thyroid hormone may exhibit symptoms such as increased thirst and urination, weight loss, increased heart rate and restlessness.

The symptoms may stop when the consumption of these levels is discontinued.

The Food and Drug Administration analyzed the product after receiving a complaint that four dogs consuming it were found to have low Free T4 (fT4) and Thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH).

The recalled product, sold in pet stores and ecommerce sites along the east coast of the U.S., involves a single batch (548 cases) of 13-oz., 95% premium beef dog food with a UPC # of 85038-11167 and a date code of 08/2020.

What to do

Customers who purchased the recalled product should stop feeding it to their dogs.

Consumers who have questions or would like a refund or coupon for replacement product, may call (888) 763-2738, Monday through Friday, between 9:00 AM and 5:00 PM (EST).

Dave’s Pet Food of Agawam, Mass., is recalling a single lot of Dave’s Dog Food 95% premium beef cans that may contain elevated levels of beef thyroid hormo...

Article Image

Merrick Pet Care recalls Good Buddy and Backcountry treats

Merrick Pet Care of Amarillo, Texas, is recalling beef dog treats that may contain elevated levels of a naturally-occurring beef thyroid hormone.

Dogs consuming high levels of beef thyroid hormone may exhibit increased thirst and urination, weight loss, increased heart rate and restlessness.

One consumer complained that dog’s health was temporarily affected while eating the recalled product, but improved after discontinuing consumption of the treat.

The following beef treat products, sold in the U.S. through pet specialty, grocery and online retailers, with limited distribution in Canada, are being recalled:

ItemUPCBest Before Date Range
Castor & Pollux Good Buddy Prime Patties Real Beef Recipe 4 oz.7808725108065/1/2017 - 9/1/2019
Castor & Pollux Good Buddy Sausage Cuts Real Beef Recipe 5 oz.7808725107455/1/2017 - 9/1/2019
Merrick Backcountry Great Plains Real Beef Jerky 4.5 oz.0228087861605/1/2019 - 9/1/2019
Merrick Backcountry Great Plains Real Beef Sausage Cuts 5 oz.0228087860475/1/2017 - 9/1/2019
Merrick Backcountry Great Plains Real Steak Patties 4 oz.0228087860785/1/2017 - 9/1/2019

The production codes are on the lower back of the treat bag.

What to do

Customers who purchased the recalled products may contact the firm at 800-664-7387 from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. (CT) Monday through Friday, by email at customerservice@merrickpetcare.com, or online at www.merrickpetcare.com/customerrelations.

Merrick Pet Care of Amarillo, Texas, is recalling beef dog treats that may contain elevated levels of a naturally-occurring beef thyroid hormone.Dogs c...

Article Image

Loving Pets recalls air-puffed dog treats

Loving Pets of Cranbury, N.J., is recalling a limited number of air-puffed dog treats that may be contaminated with Salmonella.

No illnesses, injuries or complaints have been reported.

The following products are being recalled:

Loving Pets Barksters

  • Item #5700 Sweet Potato and Chicken UPC 842982057005 - Lot # 021619
  • Item #5705 Brown Rice and Chicken UPC 842982057050 - Lot 021419

Loving Pets Puffsters Snack Chips

  • Item #5100 Apple and Chicken UPC 842982051003 - Lot 051219, 112118, 112918, 012719, 012519, 013019
  • Item #5110 Banana and Chicken UPC 842982051102 - Lot 112218, 112818, 112918, 013119
  • Item #5120 Sweet Potato and Chicken UPC 842982051201 - Lot 112818, 020119
  • Item #5130 Cranberry and Chicken UPC 842982051300 - Lot 020319, 112918, 020219

Whole Hearted

  • Item #2570314 Chicken and Apple Puff Treats UPC 800443220696 - Lot 121418, 121918, 122318, 010419, 010619, 010519

What to do

Customers who purchased the recalled products may return them to the place of purchase.

Consumers with questions may contact the company at 866-599-PETS (7387) or online at www.LovingPetsProducts.com.

Loving Pets of Cranbury, N.J., is recalling a limited number of air-puffed dog treats that may be contaminated with Salmonella.No illnesses, injuries o...

Article Image

EuroCan Manufacturing recalls pig ears pet products

EuroCan Manufacturing is recalling individually shrink-wrapped, 6-pack, 12-pack and 25-pack bags of Barnsdale Farms, HoundsTooth and Mac's Choice Pig Ears pet products.

The products may be contaminated with Salmonella.

No illnesses of any kind have been reported to date.

The pig ears, lot number 84, were distributed throughout the U.S. and Canada.

What to do

Customers who purchased the recalled products should return them to the place of purchase for a refund.

Consumers with questions may contact the company Monday – Friday from 9:00 am to 5:00 pm (ET) at (888) 290-7606.

EuroCan Manufacturing is recalling individually shrink-wrapped, 6-pack, 12-pack and 25-pack bags of Barnsdale Farms, HoundsTooth and Mac's Choice Pig Ears...

Article Image

Wellpet recalls one canned topper product for dogs

WellPet is recalling a limited amount of one canned topper product for dogs.

The product may contain elevated levels of naturally occurring beef thyroid hormone.

The company has received no reports of any health problems to date.

The the following product, a mixer or topper is intended for intermittent or supplemental feeding only, is being recalled:

  • Wellness 95% Beef Topper for Dogs – 13.2 oz, Best-By Dates of 02 FEB 19, 29 AUG 19 and 30 AUG 19, located on the bottom of the can.

The recalled product was distributed at pet specialty retailers throughout North America and online.

What to do

Customers who purchased the recalled product may contact the company at 1-877-227-9587 or by email at wecare@wellpet.com. 

WellPet is recalling a limited amount of one canned topper product for dogs.The product may contain elevated levels of naturally occurring beef thyroid...

Article Image

Blue Buffalo recalls dog food product

Blue Buffalo Company is recalling one production lot of BLUE Wilderness Rocky Mountain Recipe Red Meat Dinner Wet Food for Adult Dogs.

The product may contain elevated levels of naturally- occurring beef thyroid hormones. Dogs ingesting high levels of beef thyroid hormones may exhibit symptoms such as increased thirst and urination, weight loss, increased heart rate and restlessness.

These symptoms may resolve when the use of the impacted food is discontinued. However, with prolonged consumption these symptoms may increase in severity and may include vomiting, diarrhea, and rapid or difficulty breathing.

There have been no reports of illness.

The following item is being recalled:

Product NameUPC CodeBest Buy Date

BLUE Wilderness Rocky Mountain 
Recipe Red Meat Dinner Wet 
Food for Adult Dogs 12.5 oz can

840243101153

June 7, 2019

The recalled product was distributed nationally through pet specialty and on-line retailers.

What to do

Customers who purchased the recalled product should dispose of it or return it to the place of purchase for a full refund.

Consumers with questions may contact Blue Buffalo at 866-201-9072 from 8 AM – 5 PM(ET) Monday through Friday, or by email at CustomerCare@bluebuffalo.com for more information.

Blue Buffalo Company is recalling one production lot of BLUE Wilderness Rocky Mountain Recipe Red Meat Dinner Wet Food for Adult Dogs.The product may c...

Article Image

Against the Grain Pet Food recalls products over pentobarbital concerns

Against the Grain Pet Food is initiating a recall for one lot of its "Against the Grain Pulled Beef with Gravy Dinner for Dogs" dog food. Company officials say that the product may be contaminated with pentobarbital.

Pentobarbital is a barbiturate that can cause several side effects for dogs who consume it, including drowsiness, dizziness, excitement, loss of balance, nausea nystagmus (wherein the eyes move back and forth in a jerky manner), inability to stand, and coma. 

The product was manufactured and distributed in 2015 and has an expiration date of December, 2019. The lot number on affected products is 2415E01ATB12 and the second half of the universal product code (UPC) is 80001. These figures can be found on the back of the product label. 

What to do

There have been no complaints reported to Against the Grain about the product at this time. However, consumers in possession of recalled cans are urged not to feed it to the food to pets. 

The company recommends returning the product to the place of purchase. Consumers who do so will receive a full case of Against the Grain food for any inconvenience.

For more information, consumers can contact the company at 1-800-288-6796, Monday through Friday, between 11:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. CST.

Against the Grain Pet Food is initiating a recall for one lot of its "Against the Grain Pulled Beef with Gravy Dinner for Dogs" dog food. Company officials...

Article Image

Northwest Farm Food Cooperative recalls frozen raw cat food

Northwest Farm Food Cooperative of Burlington, Wash., is recalling frozen raw cat food.

The product may be contaminated with Salmonella.

No pet or consumer illnesses from this product have been reported to date.

The recalled product was sold from the company's facility in Burlington, Wash., in 50-lb. blocks and cases of six 10-lb. chubs packaged in a white plastic bag labeled “Cat Food.” They have the production code Jul12015B, which can be found on the outside of the case (box), and no UPC code.

Customers who purchased the recalled product should stop using it and return it to the place of purchase for a full refund, or dispose of it immediately.

Consumers with questions may call (360) 757-4225 Monday – Friday from 9:00 am – 4:00 pm (PST).

Northwest Farm Food Cooperative of Burlington, Wash., is recalling frozen raw cat food. The product may be contaminated with Salmonella. No pet or consum...

Article Image

Pet International Inc. Recalls Buster's 6” Beef Trachea Pet Treat

Pet International of Miami, Florida is recalling 1500 units of 6” Beef Trachea Pet Treat because it has the potential to be contaminated with Salmonella. Salmonella can affect animals (i.e. dogs) eating the products and there is risk to humans from handling contaminated pet products, especially if they have not thoroughly washed their hands after having contact with the products or any surfaces exposed to these products.

The 6” Beef Trachea Pet Treat was distributed to retail stores in the following Cities: Conifer, and Lakewood in Colorado.

If you have this product, use gloves and put it in a double bag and throw it away as soon as possible. Do not touch the product in any way, and if you do, it’s recommended you must wash your hands immediately with an antibacterial soap.

The potentially affected product will pertain to a particular lot number, and are specific to a particular size of the pouch it’s sold in. Anyone having these products should verify the following:

Brand: Buster’s Natural Pet Supply,
Lot Code: 8501450,
Size: 6” Beef Trachea/ 12 Pack Plastic Pouch,
UPC Code: 8501450

No illnesses have been reported to date. We are still warning consumers that if any of the above information is on the package you have, do not feed it to any animals at all. It may be hazardous and should be disposed of immediately.

The recall was as the result of a routine sampling program by the Colorado Department of Agriculture and analyzed by FDA, obtained from Buster’s Natural Pet Supply in Conifer, CO. and found to be positive for Salmonella. The product sampled had a Buster’s Label on it, but was manufactured by Pet International. Buster’s Natural Pet Supply recalled the entire product from the two stores that the distributor sells it. The Pet International Inc. continues their investigation as to what caused the problem.

Consumers with any questions about the recall product may contact the company at by phone at (305) 591-3338 Monday through Friday 9:00am too 5:00pm EST or via e-mail at sergioh@petint.com.

Pet International of Miami, Florida is recalling 1500 units of 6” Beef Trachea Pet Treat because it has the potential to be contaminated with Salmonella....

Article Image

Petco removes dog and cat treats from China -- first major chain to do so

Petco, responding to a rash of unexplained illnesses in dogs and cats, says it has removed all China-made dog and cat treats from shelves at more than 1,300 retail stores nationwide, including Unleashed by Petco stores and online at Petco.com.

Walmart quietly pulled China-made treats from its shelves in 2007 following the well-publicized death of a two-year-old Chihuahua who died suddenly after eating Bestro chicken jerky strips. Walmart did not publicly comment on the action and did not commit to keeping Chinese treats off its shelves in the future.

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has been collecting and studying case reports of pet illnesses for years has still not pinned down the exact cause of the problems, although the agency said in May 2014 that it had confirmed the presence of a prohibited antiviral drug in treats containing chicken from China.

In its latest report, the FDA said it has combed through more than 4,800 complaints of illness in pets that ate chicken, duck, or sweet potato jerky treats, nearly all of them imported from China.

The reports include more than 1,000 canine deaths and involve a total of more than 5,600 dogs, 24 cats and three people. Some consumers reported illness in more than one pet.

While there's no guarantee that pet treats made in the U.S. or other non-Chinese venues are safe, many pet owners have vowed to stop buying treats from China.

“As a trusted partner for pet parents, we believe this is the right thing to do, and we’re proud to take this step in the best interest of pets,” said Jim Myers, Petco CEO. “What we feed our pets matters, and this milestone supports the company’s steadfast commitment to putting our customers, partners, animals and the communities we serve first.”

The safety and health benefits of food and treats continue to be top concerns for pet owners, according to a recent survey.

The survey by Packaged Facts found that 55% of dog owners and 48% of cat owners agree that fear of pet food contamination and product safety is a key consideration for the pet foods they buy. The survey also found that 61% of dog owners and 50% of cat owners seek out food made in the U.S.

Petco, responding to a rash of unexplained illnesses in dogs and cats, says it has removed all China-made dog and cat treats from shelves at more than 1,30...

Article Image

Natura Pet recalls dry cat and ferret food

Natura Pet Products is recalling certain lots of dry cat and dry ferret food produced in its Fremont, Nebraska facility.

Due to a formulation error, the products contain insufficient levels of vitamins and excess minerals.

There have been no reports of animal health concerns to date,

The affected product and lot codes are:

PRODUCTSIZEUPCEXP DATELOT CODE
EVO® Grain Free Turkey & Chicken Formula dry cat & kitten food15.4 LB5148 54140002/19/20164300A700D2
EVO® Grain Free Turkey & Chicken Formula dry cat & kitten food2.2 LB5148 54140202/20/20164301A700A4
EVO® Grain Free Turkey & Chicken Formula dry cat & kitten food2.2 LB5148 54140202/20/20164301A700B4
EVO® Grain Free Turkey & Chicken Formula dry cat & kitten food2.2 LB5148 54140202/20/20164301A700C4
EVO® Grain Free Ferret Food6.6 LB5148 54210102/19/20164300A700D3

The recalled products were were distributed through independent retailers in California, Georgia, Michigan, Minnesota, Nevada, Pennsylvania, Texas, Vermont and Canada, as well as online. No other Natura products are affected.

Consumers who purchased the product should discontinue feeding the product immediately and discard as normal household waste.

Consumers may contact Natura consumer relations at 1-855-206-8297, Monday through Friday 9:00 AM to 6:00 PM EST.

Natura Pet Products is recalling certain lots of dry cat and dry ferret food produced in its Fremont, Nebraska facility. Due to a formulation error, the ...

Article Image

PEDIGREE expands recall of Adult Complete Nutrition dog food

Mars Petcare is expanding its previous recallof PEDIGREE Adult Complete Nutrition dry dog food products.

The product may contain a foreign material.

The initial recall, which affected 22 bags shipped to Dollar General in four states, has been expanded to include 55-pound bags of the product sold in Sam's Club in Indiana, Michigan and Ohio.

Some of the affected production lot was originally said to be held in inventory but was instead released to consumers.

The company says it has received no reports of injury or illness associated with the affected product.

The lot codes indicated below should not be sold or consumed:

  • 55-pound bags of PEDIGREE® Adult Complete Nutrition dry dog food sold at Sam's Club will have the lot code 432E1KKM03 printed on the back of the bag near the UPC and a Best Before date of 8/7/15. See below for a list of Sam's Club stores.
  • 15-pound bags of PEDIGREE® Adult Complete Nutrition dry dog food sold at Dollar General stores will have the lot code 432C1KKM03 printed on the back of the bag near the UPC and a Best Before date of 8/5/15. See below for a list of Dollar General stores.
UPCDESCRIPTION
23100 10944PEDIGREE® Brand Adult Complete Nutrition dry dog food in 15 pound bags
23100 10731PEDIGREE® Brand Adult Complete Nutrition dry dog food in 55 pound bags

Affected 15-pound bags were sold between August 18 and August 30 at Dollar General stores in:

Arkansas

  • Perryville
  • Cabot

Louisiana

  • Baton Rouge
  • Calhoun
  • Hineston
  • Jonesville
  • Pineville
  • Slaughter

Mississippi

  • Magnolia
  • Vicksburg

Tennessee

  • Memphis

Sam's Club Affected 55-pound bags were sold between August 14 and August 30 at Sam's Club in:

Michigan

  • Comstock Park
  • Muskegon
  • Jackson
  • Roseville
  • Saginaw
  • Saginaw
  • Kokomo

Ohio

  • Dayton
  • Holland
  • Lima

Mars Petcare is expanding its previous recall of PEDIGREE Adult Complete Nutrition dry dog food products. The product may contain a foreign material. The...

Article Image

PEDIGREE Brand Adult Complete Nutrition dog food recalled

Mars Petcare is recalling 22 bags of PEDIGREE Adult Complete Nutrition dry dog food products.

The product may contain a foreign material.

The company has not received any reports of injury or illness associated with the affected product.

The recalled bags, which were sold between August 18 and August 25 in 12 Dollar General stores in Mississippi, Arkansas, Tennessee and Louisiana, may contain small metal fragments, which could have entered the packages during the production process.

Consumers who have purchased affected product to discard the food or return it to the retailer for a full refund or exchange. We have not received any reports of injury or illness associated with the affected product. The lot codes indicated below should not be consumed.

Only 15-pound bags of the product with the production code shown below are included in this recall. Each product will have a lot code printed on the back of the bag near the UPC code that reads 432C1KKM03 and a Best Before date of 8/5/15.

UPCDESCRIPTION
23100 10944PEDIGREE® Brand Adult Complete Nutrition dry dog food in 15 pound bags

The recalled product would have been sold in Dollar General Stores in these cities:

  • Arkansas:
    • Perryville
    • Cabot
  • Louisiana
    • Baton Rouge
    • Calhoun
    • Hineston
    • Jonesville
    • Pineville
    • Slaughter
  • Mississippi
    • Magnolia
    • Vicksburg
  • Tennessee
    • Memphis

 Pet owners who have questions about the recall may call 1-800-305-5206.

Mars Petcare is recalling 22 bags of PEDIGREE Adult Complete Nutrition dry dog food products. The product may contain a foreign material. The company h...

Article Image

Hearing scheduled on tainted pet treats from China

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recently estimated that more than 1,000 dogs have died in circumstances that involved pet treats from China. But the agency said it still hadn't pinned down the exact cause of the deaths and illnesses.

That may well be but pet owners and their advocates have been demanding action, and tomorrow (Tuesday), U.S. Sen. Sherrod Brown (D-Ohio) will chair a hearing of the Congressional-Executive Commission on China (CECC) to examine the safety of its meat processing.

The hearing, entitled “Pet Treats and Processed Chicken from China: Concerns for American Consumers and Pets,” will ask if China’s food safety regulation is effective. Brown has repeatedly urged the FDA to take quick action to protect consumers and pet owners following an increase in tainted pet treats from China connected to animal deaths and illnesses.

Recently, major pet stores have announced that they would stop selling dog and cat treats made in China following the animal deaths linked to Chinese food products. Food safety advocates have expressed alarm at new rules that could allow chickens raised in the United States to be shipped to China for processing before being returned to and sold in the U.S. 

Researchers are also exploring the connection between the domestic outbreak of Porcine Epidemic Diarrhea virus in China.

These developments highlight concerns over the effectiveness of China’s food safety regulation, the effectiveness of U.S. government regulation of imported foods from China, and the overall safety of such foods, according to a Brown staffer.

There's also the question of whether current labels are adequate in helping American consumers tell when food products contains ingredients from China.

The CECC is a bipartisan commission made up of Senators, House Members, and senior Administration officials. The Commission was created by Congress in October 2000 with the legislative mandate to monitor human rights and the development of the rule of law in China.

Following the deaths of 1,000 dogs linked to tainted pet treats from China, U.S. Sen. Sherrod Brown (D-OH) will chair a hearing of the Congressional-Execut...

Article Image

Jerky treats implicated in 1,000 dog deaths, FDA reports

For years, angry pet owners have accused jerky treats for causing their dogs' and cats' illness and deaths. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has been collecting and studying case reports but says it still hasn't pinned down the exact cause of the problems, although it has confirmed the presence of a prohibited antiviral drug in treats containing chicken from China.

In its latest report, the FDA said it has combed through more than 4,800 complaints of illness in pets that ate chicken, duck, or sweet potato jerky treats, nearly all of them imported from China.

The reports include more than 1,000 canine deaths and involve a total of more than 5,600 dogs, 24 cats and three people. Some consumers reported illness in more than one pet.

The symptoms reported will sound familiar to anyone who's kept up with the problem: approximately 60 percent of the cases report gastrointestinal/liver disease, 30 percent kidney or urinary disease, with the remaining 10 percent of complaints including various other signs such as neurologic, dermatologic, and immunologic symptoms.

About 15 percent of the kidney or urinary cases also tested positive for Fanconi syndrome, a rare kidney disease that has been associated with this investigation.

Veterinarian reports

Besides reports from consumers, the FDA said it has received "many well-documented case reports" from veterinarians, the result of an October 2013 "Dear Veterinarian" letter the agency sent to vets nationwide.

Following up on the vets' reports, the FDA conducted 26 examinations of dead dogs. It found that half of them had causes of death that appeared to be related to consumption of jerky treats.

While the other 13 did not appear to be directly related, the FDA said "an association with consumption of jerky pet treats could not be ruled out."

Help from CDC

The FDA has also asked the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) for help. Although it normally deals only with human illness, the CDC is assisting with a study of cases involving sick dogs compared with a control group of healthy dogs.

The goal is to compared the foods eaten by the sick dogs compared with that eaten by the healthy dogs and to determined whether sick dogs ate more jerky and other pet treats than healthy dogs.

The study is still underway. Results will be released when it's finished.

Drug testing

Adapting a testing methodology used by New York, the FDA said it has found low levels of the drug amantadine in some jerky samples containing chicken. Amantadine is an antiviral that is approved for use in humans but is prohibited in chickens.

The FDA said it "does not believe that amantadine contributed to the illnesses because the known side effects or adverse events associated with amantadine do not seem to correlate with the symptoms seen in the jerky pet treat-related cases."

But the agency said there should be no amantadine in jerky treats and said Chinese officials have "assured us that they will perform additional screening and will follow up with jerky pet treat manufacturers."

What to do

What's a pet owner to do? The most obvious is to avoid feeding jerky treats to pets. The FDA notes in its reports that jerky treats are not required for a balanced diet.

Animal lovers who want to give their pets an occasional treat or need to use treats for training purposes should talk to their veterinarians about which treats are best for their dog. As in humans, too many treats can lead to obesity and can crowd out healthier foods.

FDA is still collecting information. If your pet has become ill after eating jerky treats, you are encouraged to report it to FDA.

"While FDA does not necessarily respond to every individual complaint submitted, each report is valuable and becomes part of the body of knowledge that helps to inform our investigation," the agency said.

For years, angry pet owners have accused jerky treats for causing their dogs' and cats' illness and deaths. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has...

Article Image

Bravo recalls dog and cat foods

Bravo is recalling select lots and product(s) of Bravo Pet Food.

The products have the potential to be contaminated with Listeria monocytogenes.

The company has received a limited number of reports of dogs experiencing nausea and diarrhea that may be associated with these specific products.

There have been no reports of human illness as a result of these products.

The recalled product was distributed nationwide to distributors, retail stores, internet retailers and directly to consumers. The product can be identified by the batch ID code (best used by date) printed on the side of the plastic tube or on a label on the box.

The recalled products are as follows:

1) These products are being recalled because they may have the potential to be contaminated with Listeria monocytogenes:

PRODUCT: RAW FOOD DIET BRAVO! BEEF BLEND FOR DOGS AND CATS (Made in New Zealand)
All 2lb., 5lb., and 10lb. tubes
Product Numbers: 52-102, 52-105, 52-110 
Best Used By Date: 10/10/15 or earlier

PRODUCT: RAW FOOD DIET BRAVO! BEEF BLEND FOR DOGS AND CATS (Made in New Zealand)
All 2lb., 5lb., and 10lb. tubes 
Product Numbers: 52-102, 52-105, 52-110 
Best Used By Date: 10/10/15 or earlier

2) These products are being recalled out of an abundance of caution because while they did not test positive for pathogens, they were manufactured in the same manufacturing facility or on the same day as products that did test positive:

PRODUCT: RAW FOOD DIET BRAVO! LAMB BLEND FOR DOGS AND CATS (Made in New Zealand)
All 2lb., 5lb., and 10lb. tubes 
Product Numbers: 42-102, 42-105, 42-110
Best Used By Date: 10/10/15 or earlier

PRODUCT: RAW FOOD DIET BRAVO! LAMB BASIC FOR DOGS AND CATS (Made in New Zealand)
2lb. tubes 
Product Number: 42-202 
Best Used By Date: 10/10/15 or earlier

PRODUCT: RAW FOOD DIET BRAVO! BEEF & BEEF HEART FOR DOGS AND CATS (Made in New Zealand)
5lb. tubes 
Product Number: 53-130
Best Used By Date: 10/10/15 or earlier

PRODUCT: RAW FOOD DIET BRAVO! 100% PURE & NATURAL PREMIUM GRASS-FED BUFFALO FOR DOGS AND CATS (Manufactured by: Bravo! Manchester, CT)
NET WT 2LBS (32 OZ) .91KG (Tubes)
Product Number: 72-222 
Best Used By Date: 1/7/16

PRODUCT: BRAVO! TURKEY BALANCE FORMULA (Manufactured by: Bravo! Manchester, CT)
NET WT 2 LBS (32 OZ) .09KG, Chub (tube)
Product Number: 31-402 
Best Used By Dates: 1/7/16 and 2/11/16

NET WT 5 LBS (80 OZ) 2.3KG, Chub (tube) 
Product Number: 31-405
Best Used By Dates: 1/7/16 and 2/11/16

PRODUCT: RAW FOOD DIET BRAVO! LAMB BLEND FOR DOGS AND CATS (Manufactured by: Bravo! Manchester, CT)
5 LBS (80 OZ) 2.3KG, Chub (tube)
Product Number: 42-105
Best Used By Date: 2/11/16

Pet owners who have the affected product should dispose of this product in a safe manner (example, a securely covered trash receptacle). They can return to the store where purchased and submit the Product Recall Claim Form available on the Bravo website www.bravopetfoods.com for a full refund or store credit.

Consumers may contact Bravo toll free at (866) 922-9222.

Bravo is recalling select lots and product(s) of Bravo Pet Food. The products have the potential to be contaminated with Listeria monocytogenes. The comp...

Article Image

Purina recalls poultry feeds

The Purina Animal Nutrition feed plant in Portland, Ore., is recalling certain poultry feeds due to the potential for lower-than-expected vitamin and trace mineral levels.

Inadequate vitamin and trace mineral levels can result in health problems, including mortality, in poultry.

No customer complaints have been received to date.

The products were distributed to retailers in Oregon and Washington.

The products and lot numbers involved in the recall are:

Formula No.Item Mo.UPC CodeProduct NameLot No.
54190001381804273029559PURINA GAME BIRD STARTENA CRUMBLE 50 LB4APR08RIV3
4APR09RIV2
510M0010736749394513269DEL’S POULTRY LAYER PELLET 50 LB4APR09RIV3
510T0010737749394513276DEL’S LAYER CRUMBLE 50 LB4APR08RIV1
60220015219883576010792HOME GROWN LAYER 16% CRUMBLE 50 LB4APR08RIV3
61R30052070804273038728PURINA LAYENA SUNFRESH RECIPE PELLET 40 LB4APR08RIV2
61X30057261804273029542PURINA START & GROW SUNFRESH CRUMBLES 25 LB4APR09RIV2
61V30057262804273029559PURINA START & GROW SUNFRESH MP 0.0125% MEDICATED 50 LB4APR07RIV3
4APR10RIV1
61Y30057265804273029573PURINA START & GROW SUNFRESH MP 0.0125% MEDICATED CRUMBLES 25 LB4APR08RIV2
61Z30057277804273029634PURINA LAYENA SUNFRESH RECIPE PELLET 25 LB4APR10RIV1
L55M5052155883576003237ALBERS BROILER STARTER/FINISHER CRUMBLES 50 LB4APR09RIV1
L55N5052156883576003251ALBERS CHICK STARTER/GROWER 18% AMP MEDICATED CRUMBLES 50 LB4APR09RIV2

The recalled products were packaged in typical brand-specific feed bags. Lot numbers are printed on the sewing strip of each bag. Lot numbers are interpreted as follows:

  • Example 4APR09RIV1: 4=Year / APR=Month / 09=Day of Month / RIV=Plant Code / 1=Shift code.

The problem was discovered during the investigation of an ingredient inventory discrepancy.

Retailers have been contacted and instructed to immediately withdraw from sale the recalled product and notify customers who purchased the product. Customers should discontinue feeding the product immediately. Customers who purchased this product should return remaining bags to their retailer.

Consumers may contact Purina customer service at 1-800-245-5333, Monday through Friday 7:00 AM to 4:30 PM PDT.  

The Purina Animal Nutrition feed plant in Portland, Ore., is recalling certain poultry feeds due to the potential for lower-than-expected vitamin and trace...

Article Image

Abady brand cat food recalled

The Robert Abady Dog Food Co., of Poughkeepsie, N.Y., is recalling its 2-lb, 5-lb and 15-lb boxes of "Abady Highest Quality Maintenance & Growth Formula for Cats.”

The product has the potential to be contaminated with Salmonella.

No illnesses have been reported to date in connection with this problem.

The recalled product, distributed nationwide in retail stores and through mail orders, comes in a 2-lb, 5-lb and 15-lb, corrugated boxes with plastic liners marked with lot # 14029/21 stamped on the right side top of the box.

Production has been suspended wpending an investigation into the source of the problem.

Consumers who have purchased the recalled product should return it to the place of purchase for a full refund.

Consumers with questions may contact the company at 1-845-473-1900, Monday – Friday, 8:30am - 5:00pm, ET.

The Robert Abady Dog Food Co., of Poughkeepsie, N.Y., is recalling its 2-lb, 5-lb and 15-lb boxes of "Abady Highest Quality Maintenance & Growth Formula fo...

Article Image

New York breaks up puppy-flipping ring

We've all heard of investors who "flip" houses. But puppies? Yes, it's true: New York Attorney General Eric T. Schneiderman has tightened the leash on two individuals who bought puppies online, treated them shabbily, then posed as breeders and resold them online.

In one case, the Attorney General’s office reached an agreement with an individual in the Syracuse area who bought puppies on Craigslist, kept them in poor conditions without access to a veterinarian, and resold them illegally.

In another, the office obtained a court order against an individual in Buffalo who posed as a puppy breeder, when in fact the puppies she sold were purchased online, malnourished, and sold to consumers who reported fleas, filth, and near-death health conditions among the pets.

Both pet flippers have been permanently barred from selling animals or becoming licensed pet dealers.  

“Today’s developments are a win-win. By shutting down operations where animals are being illegally sold, we can help ensure that consumers are purchasing healthy pets, while protecting the animals themselves from those who break the law to turn a profit,” said Schneiderman. “In holding these individuals accountable, we are sending the message that this sort of behavior will not be tolerated.”

Flipping free dogs

Those who flip dogs not only purchase the dogs, but also flip dogs they have received at no cost. Obtaining a dog at little or no cost and then spending a minimal amount (if anything) on the dog’s care quickly maximizes the return. Current pet owners should be aware of this when considering giving up their pet, and should always go through an authorized facility, such as a local SPCA or shelter. 

Puppy flipper Stephanie Arcara bought puppies advertised on Craigslist and then sold them to unsuspecting customers in the Buffalo area. Arcara, who was not a licensed pet dealer, kept the puppies in her home, where they were poorly cared for.  According to one consumer, the puppy she purchased from Arcara was covered in feces and urine, had patches of hair missing on its body and was very thin. Another reported that a puppy he purchased from Arcara was dehydrated and suffered from constant seizures, while others reported that puppies sold by Arcara had worms, fleas and bladder infections. One puppy even died shortly after Arcara sold it.

Arcara illegally sold dozens of puppies to unsuspecting consumers, usually by advertising on Craigslist. She misrepresented herself to consumers as a breeder of the puppies when, in fact, she had purchased them on Craigslist. Arcara also misrepresented the breed of the puppies she sold, sometimes claiming they were purebreds when they were not, and told consumers that the puppies had been dewormed and were current on their shots, which was also not the case. 

Carissa Seaman, of Cleveland, NY, bought animals, or obtained them for free, from Craigslist and the trading post of a local radio station. She would then re-sell the dogs to other consumers for more money than she paid for them – flipping the dogs and pocketing the difference. In just one year, Seaman sold over two dozen dogs.

Seaman, who is not a licensed pet dealer, kept the dogs in her home, but cared for them poorly. None of the dogs sold by Seaman received veterinarian care.  In July of 2013, she offered to sell a five week old St. Bernard puppy that had fleas and flea feces on its skin to two undercover AG investigators. Another seven month old fawn pug for sale had two patches of fur missing from his back revealing raw and irritated skin.  

We've all heard of investors who "flip" houses. But puppies? Yes, it's true: New York Attorney General Eric T. Schneiderman has tightened the lease on...

Article Image

Why a pet might not make a good Christmas present

The puppy under the tree with a huge bow around its neck makes for a great Christmas card but it might not be such a good idea in reality. Taking on a pet requires some careful thought that should be removed from the emotion of the holiday season, experts caution.

Veterinarian Dr. Karen Becker, writing in her Healthy Pets blog, say she isn't a big fan of giving pets as holiday gifts. 

“Gifting a family member or friend with a 10- to 20-year commitment to a live animal is not something one should do on impulse,” she writes.

People often don't think about the future – at least not the extended future -- when they think about bringing home a pet. The idea that the animal will be with them for years doesn't sink in until later. Before making such a long term decision, there are a number of questions that should be posed and answered honestly.

Questions to ask

For example, how much time each day can you and other family members commit to your pet? There are work and school schedules to consider and the needs of some animals are greater than others. With ample food, water and a clean litter box, a cat can be quite self-sufficient for occasional lengthy periods of time. A dog, on the other hand, is going to need regular outdoor time.

Some dogs are going to need more attention than others, so you have to know something about the breed you are taking on as a companion. Large energetic breeds are going to need at least a couple of walks each day.

Even if you feel you can't make that kind of commitment, remember that small dogs and cats are still going to require plenty of attention.

Like a baby without a diaper

Then there is the age consideration. Puppies are cute but are similar to bringing home a baby, but a baby that runs through the house without a diaper, chewing on everything. Puppies have to be house-broken but in the best of circumstances, accidents are going to happen in the process.

Families often consider their finances before deciding when to have children and doing the same for pets may be viewed as advisable, because having a dog or cat brings with it financial responsibilities.

In addition to upfront costs like adoption fees, there are other factors that raise the cost of a pet. Large dogs consume large quantities of food. Some breeds will need professional grooming services more often. And for particularly spirited puppies and kittens, obedience training might be needed.

Add up the costs

Before bringing home a pet, be sure to look into all the costs associated with that pet, including costs that could come later in the animals life.

If the pet is for a child, how do you know the child is really that interested? Is the child old enough and willing to take on responsibility? If not, an adult in the household will need to step in and do it.

Giving a pet to an adult friend as a gift is even dicier. You may know your own children and are there to provide back up. Not so with the case of a friend living in another household. And while you may think you know your friend very well, the choice of a pet is a very personal decision, best left to the individual themselves.

If you have children who want a dog, cat or other pet for Christmas, a better gift might be a collar, leash, scratching post or other pet paraphernalia, in anticipation of selecting a pet after the holidays. And when selecting a pet, it goes without saying that choosing an animal from a shelter makes the gift much more special, both for the recipient and the animal who gets a new home.

The puppy under the tree with a huge bow around its neck makes for a great Christmas card but it might not be such a good idea in reality. Taking on a pet ...

Article Image

Bailey’s Choice expands recall of dog treats in Georgia

An earlier recall of Bailey’s Choice dog treats is being expanded to include the following products:

  • 100% Chicken Treat, lot # “Jun 2 2013”
  • 100% Chicken Treat, lot # “Jun 3 2013”
  • 100% Chicken Breast Treat, lot # “Jun 4 2013”
  • 100% Chicken Treat, lot # “Jun 15 2013”
  • 100% Chicken Treat, lot # “Jul 8 2013”
  • 100% Chicken Treat, lot # “Jul 11 2013”
  • 100% Teriyaki Chicken Treats, lot # 132881

The products, which were sold in Georgia, may be contaminated with Salmonella. To date, no illnesses have been reported.

The earlier recall was for packages of chicken treats in various sizes marked with lot number #132881 and expiration date Feb. 2014, along with five-ounce bags of chicken jerky with a lot number of “Jun 5 2013.”

Consumers should return the products to the place of purchase for a full refund.

Consumers with questions should contact Bailey’s Choice at 770-881-0526 or thomdo4570@gmail.com.

An earlier recall of Bailey’s Choice dog treats is being expanded to include the following products: 100% Chicken Treat, lot # “Jun 2 2013” 100% Chicken ...

Article Image

New FDA guidelines for animal feed

The Food and Drug Administration, as part of its Food Safety and Modernization Act, has proposed new safety guidelines for animal food. But for the average consumer, the most surprising thing about this announcement might be the fact that the proposed new guidelines aren’t already the law.

The FDA itself concedes that it is only now "proposing preventive measures to protect all animal foods from disease-causing bacteria, chemicals and other contaminants."

The propsed new rules affect both pet food and the feed that is given to livestock. 

“Unlike safeguards already in place to protect human foods, there are currently no regulations governing the safe production of most animal foods. There is no type of hazard analysis. This rule would change all that,” says Daniel McChesney, Ph.D., director of the Office of Surveillance and Compliance at FDA’s Center for Veterinary Medicine (CVM).

McChesney notes that human and animal health are intertwined. People can get sick when pet food is contaminated by disease-causing bacteria like Salmonella. When such food is handled by pet owners and placed on kitchen surfaces, the bacteria can spread to foods consumed by their family.

And if an animal has eaten feed contaminated with a chemical like dioxin and then enters the food supply, consumers could likewise absorb the chemical, putting their health at risk.

By helping to prevent the contamination of animal foods, the proposed rule protects pets and people alike, he says.

Jerky treats

Earlier this week, we reported that the FDA is asking for pet owners to help them figure out exactly why, since 2007, hundreds of American dogs and cats have died after eating presumably tainted beef jerky treats. Only last month could we report that the FDA would require pet food labels to list any artificial colorings included among its ingredients.

In one of the most infamous examples of pet food contamination, dogs and cats across the country were sickened and killed in 2007 when melamine, a chemical used to make plastic, was added to pet food ingredients imported from China. 

The requirements proposed in both the animal and import rules are designed to help prevent that from happening again, McChesney says.

Humane Society approves

The Humane Society of the United States is applauding the FDA's action, noting the thousands of pets sickened by jerky treats and contaminated dog food in recent years.

“As the recent shock over the deaths of hundreds of pets who consumed imported jerky treats illustrates, there is an urgent need for stronger regulations protecting the safety of our pet food and treat supply," CEO Wayne Pacelle said. "Pets reside in 68 percent of U.S. households and are cherished members of our families who deserve high-quality, safe, nutritious food and treats.

"We urge the FDA to continue investigating the cause of the pet food deaths, and encourage pet owners who suspect their pets may have consumed contaminated products to report their case to the FDA’s consumer reporting system,” Pacelle said.

Even if you’ve never owned an animal in your life the regulations are still likely to affect you because, as McChesney told NBC, “We have been pushing feed safety for a number of years. It’s not, ‘Oh, we’re just making food for animals.’ They’re the first part of the food chain. We're a part of the overall food industry.”

The proposed new rules will be open for public comment for 120 days. If put into law, they would apply to all domestic and imported animal feed, as well as the raw ingredients used to make it.

The Food and Drug Administration, as part of its Food Safety and Modernization Act, has proposed new safety guidelines for animal food. But for the average...

Article Image

FDA can't track down source of pet poisonings, asks for public's help

Everyone has a pet theory or two about what is making America's dogs and cats sick after they eat jerky treats but no one has managed to conclusively prove any of those theories.

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration admits it is stumped and is asking for help from pet owners. It already has reports of jerky treat-related illnesses involving 3,600 dogs and 10 cats in the U.S. since 2007. At least 580 of them died.

Now the FDA says it would like to hear from any pet owner whose animal became sick or died after eating jerky treats.

"This is one of the most elusive and mysterious outbreaks we've encountered," says CVM Director Bernadette Dunham, DVM, Ph.D. "Our beloved four-legged companions deserve our best effort, and we are giving it." Dunham says the FDA has conducted more than 1,200 tests, visited pet treat manufacturers in China and talked with experts of all kinds without nailing down the source of the problem. 

"Our fervent hope as animal lovers," says Dunham, "is that we will soon find the cause of—and put a stop to—these illnesses."

Made in China

Most of the jerky treats implicated in the illnesses have been made in China and the FDA notes that by law, manufacturers of pet foods are not required to state the country of origin for each ingredient in their products.

A number of jerky pet treat products were removed from the market in January 2013 after a New York State lab reported finding evidence of up to six drugs in certain jerky pet treats made in China. The FDA says the drug levels were very low and claims it's unlikely that they caused the illnesses, but the agency concedes that it noted a decrease in reports of jerky-suspected illnesses after the products were removed from the market. FDA believes that the number of reports may have declined simply because fewer jerky treats were available.

What to do

The agency is publishing a fact sheet that it will send to veterinarians, asking them to use it to alert consumers to the problem and to provide instructions on reporting pet illnesses. 

The fact sheet also points out that the treats are not essential to a balanced diet.  Many pet owners bake their own treats. Others use pieces of the pet's regular kibble as a treat. If you do provide jerky treats and your pet becomes sick, stop the treats immediately, consider seeing your veterinarian, and save any remaining treats and the packaging for possible testing.

Be careful handling the treats. Humans are also susceptible to some of the conditions transmitted by pet food.

What next?

More than 1,200 jerky pet treat samples have been tested since 2011 for a variety of chemical and microbiological contaminants, from antibiotics to metals, pesticides and Salmonella. DNA testing has also been conducted, along with tests for nutritional composition, the FDA said.

In addition to continuing to test jerky pet treat samples within FDA labs, the agency is working with the Veterinary Laboratory Investigation and Response Network (Vet-LIRN), an FDA-coordinated network of government and veterinary diagnostic laboratories across the U.S. and Canada. (A summary of the tests is available on Vet-LIRN's webpage.)

Inspections of the facilities in China that manufacture jerky products associated with some of the highest numbers of pet illness reports did not identify the cause of illness. However, they did identify additional paths of investigation, such as the supply chain of some ingredients in the treats.

Although FDA inspectors have found no evidence identifying the cause of the spate of illnesses, they did find that one firm used falsified receiving documents for glycerin, a jerky ingredient. Chinese authorities informed FDA that they had seized products at the firm and suspended its exports.

To identify the root cause of this problem, FDA is meeting regularly with regulators in China to share findings. The agency also plans to host Chinese scientists at its veterinary research facility to increase scientific cooperation.

Everyone has a pet theory or two about what is making America's dogs and cats sick after they eat jerky treats but no one has managed to conclusively prove...

Article Image

Class action against Purina dog treats handed a setback

A class action charging that Nestle Purina's Yam Good chicken treats killed the plaintiffs' dogs has suffered a setback. A federal judge in Illinois ruled that the consumer protection laws of the plaintiffs' home states take precedence.

U.S. District Judge Robert Gettleman also dismissed most of the allegations against Walmart, Costco, Target, BJs, CVS, Walgreens, Pet Supplies and other retailers who sold the treats, Courthouse News Service reported.

The jerky treats are made in China by Waggin' Train, a Nestle Purina company. Chinese chicken has been blamed for numerous cases of death and illness in dogs. Until recently, Chinese chicken could not be imported into the U.S. for human consumption but the USDA recently announced that four Chinese chicken plants would be allowed to import their products and would not have to label them as originating in China. 

Yam Good

Consumers rate Purina Pet Foods

In the Yam Good case, lead plaintiff Dennis Adkins says he bought Yam Good dog treats from WalMart in March 2012 for his 9-year-old Pomeranian, Cleopatra. 

"Between March 13, 2012 and March 15, 2012, Mr. Adkins gave one of the treats to Cleopatra daily, which he chopped into two to three pieces," the lawsuit states. "Mr. Adkins made no other changes in her diet."

"Immediately thereafter, Cleopatra became sick and, on March 26, 2012, died of kidney failure."

"Mr. Adkins owns another nine year old Pomeranian, named Pharaoh," the complaint continues. "Mr. Adkins did not feed any of the 'Yam Good' treats to him. Pharaoh did not become ill."

Other class members made similar claims, but Judge Gettleman said their cases should be heard in the states where they reside. 

"In the instant case, 19 out of 21 plaintiffs allege that they reside in states other than Illinois and that they purchased the chicken jerky treats and fed them to their pets in their home states. With the exception of the two plaintiffs who reside in Illinois, the complaint alleges no other facts tying any of defendants' alleged misconduct or the plaintiffs' alleged injuries to Illinois," the judge said.

A class action charging that Nestle Purina's Yam Good chicken treats killed the plaintiffs' dogs has suffered a setback. A federal judge in Illinois ruled ...

Article Image

FDA coloring regulations finally apply to pet food

If you’re a pet owner, being a responsible, informed consumer is arguably more difficult for you than it is for other Americans, because the labeling requirements for pet food are downright lax compared to the requirements applied to food for human consumption.

For example: not until 2011 did the FDA rule that color additives should be listed on the labels of pet food and animal feed, and even then, companies aren’t expected to be in full compliance until this November. On Sept. 26 the FDA released some guidelines intended to help business owners comply with these new regulations.

On another note, we often hear from readers who say that various brands of pet food made their animals sick — with almost every brand on the market generating its share of complaints. It's hard not to wonder if at least some of these animals’ health problems might be due to allergic reactions — after all, even if you know your pet is allergic to a particular additive, that won’t help you or your pet if you don’t know which foods contain those additives. And, of course, it’s a lot harder to diagnose a food allergy when you don’t know exactly what you (or your pet) have been eating.

Change of ingredients

Consumers rate Pedigree Pet Foods

Jeff G. from Franklin., North Carolina, wondered if a change of ingredients might explain why his dogs suddenly developed an inability to handle Pedigree-brand foods. As he told us, “We have 8 dogs. Various sizes and breeds…all fed Pedigree Healthy Digestion canned food for years. Two weeks ago our longhair Dachshund threw up a lot, and then the diarrhea started. Same time frame, our 13-year-old basset hound became unable to control her diarrhea and became disoriented …  When we took them to the vet for examination they of course don't feed Pedigree, so they switched brands for the time they were staying. … Since then we have thrown away the Pedigree foods and have started using the same brand food as the vet. No issues. All is quiet again.

“Now here's the weird thing. My daughter in another state told me that tonight her boxer has thrown up and had been dealing with diarrhea earlier this week. She was feeding the same Pedigree Healthy Digestion food! I asked her to contact our vet to get on the right track.

“Did something change? I know pet food companies alter formulas all the time but all of this coupled with the sheer number of very recent complaints are enough to steer me clear of Pedigree products forever.”

Amy R. of Mechanicsburg, Pennsylvania, also wondered if an ingredient change might be to blame for her pet’s sudden digestive problems—although in her case, it was Hills Science Diet food, not Pedigree.

“My two cats have been eating the Science Diet Adult Indoor Cat dry food formula for over 4 years (and ate the Kitten formula before that). Both starting throwing up from the ‘new and improved formula’ ... They're both almost 5 and I can count on one hand the number of times she has ever been sick. The other one throws up some monster hairballs, but usually every few months at the most. Now, he has been throwing up for a week. On Sunday, he threw up five times; twice with food in it and three times just liquid. After a few good days, I came home tonight, fed them their dinner, and within 20 minutes, he threw it all up. That's been the pattern: within 30 minutes of eating this stuff, he throws it up.” 

Different brands, similar pattern

Amanda J. of Burleson, Texas, told a similar story about Blue Buffalo pet food: “Our family friend's vet recently went to a vet conference and she said there were many vets bringing up concerns about this brand. They said they had seen animals with pancreatitis, severe intestinal problems, and hair falling out. ... I switched my cats and dog over as soon as I heard this. The cats were losing lots of hair and my terrier was constantly gassy and bloated and her hair was so brittle, it was coming out in handfuls. After one week off BB, every animal was back to normal. ... All I know is something needs to be done about this. We need to be educated consumers when it comes to pet food.”

Mark S. of Bordentown, New Jersey told us another story: “We have been feeding our 3-year-old cat Blue Buffalo cat food since we adopted him three years ago. Over the past week our cat has started experiencing difficulty urinating and stopped eating. When he began to leave clear spots on the floor, we realized something was terribly wrong. We rushed him to our local vet and described to her our experiences. The first question she asked was if we were feeding him Blue Buffalo cat food. We said yes, we have been since we adopted him. She informed us that our cat is the second she saw this week with urinary and kidney damage due to Blue Buffalo cat food.”

Consumers rate Blue Buffalo Pet Foods

So Jeff’s veterinarian warns patients away from Pedigree food, Amanda and Mark both know vets who avoid Blue Buffalo, Amy and other pet owners who wrote us swear never to use Science Diet again — it’s only a slight exaggeration to say that whatever brand of pet food you can name, we’ve got a file full of complaints from readers who insist it sickened their pets: Iams, Purina, Beneful, Nutro, 9 Lives and more.

Maybe those readers all were unlucky enough to buy a bad batch, maybe their pets ate something else that made them sick — or maybe the pets are allergic to an ingredient their owners don’t even know they’re eating. We have no pat, easy answer for how to solve this problem, or even to figure out exactly what the problem is — but letting pet owners know exactly what they’re feeding their animals is bound to be a good start.

You can't avoid allergens if you don't know they're there...

Article Image

Better understanding pet food contamination

Pet food recalls seem to be on the increase. A number of brands from different manufacturers have been recalled this year because of a risk of foodborne illness, primarily Salmonella.

Consumers who complain that a particular brand of pet food has sickened their dog or cat may have acquired a small quantity of contaminated product, or even contaminated it themselves, according to Dr. Mian Riaz, director of Texas A&M's Food Protein R&D Center. Recent recalls, he says, have come in spite of what are mostly strict precautions.

“The pet food manufacturers buy their ingredients based on the understanding that they are toxin-free,” Riaz said. “But in the truck one grain might be contaminated with a toxin and that one grain has the ability to spread the toxin throughout the whole truck.”

Sometimes the ingredients are fine but get contaminated once they arrive at the plant. During one small part of the manufacturing process, for example, the ingredients might come in contact with a contaminated piece of equipment, such as a mixer. The entire batch is then compromised.

Common bacteria

Salmonella is a bacteria that is a common cause of food poisoning in humans. In the U.S. there have been a number of recent Salmonella poisonings that have killed of sickened the human population, such as the widespread 2007 contamination of peanuts. In addition to harming humans this bacteria can take a deadly toll on animals.

In recent years manufacturers have stepped up internal controls to keep outbreaks to a minimum, including product tests.

“They are responsible for that and most of them do test, not every single batch but I'm sure they do it internally,” Riaz said. “If I'm running a chart I have a print-out showing I hit my required temperatures and I can prove that.”

Temperature is important because heat at a certain level will kill Salmonella and render it harmless. By ensuring that pet food ingredients are subjected to the required level of heat during the process, manufacturers are better able to control toxins and reduce the instances of food poisoning.

Post-production contamination

But once the product leaves the factory the manufacturer loses control, and it turns out that some of the contamination – perhaps a lot – occurs after the finished product is shipped out.

“If you go to the grocery store most of the dog food is stored at a controlled and proper temperature,” Riaz said. “If you buy a large supply at one time, you need to make sure you also store it properly when you get home. Read the instructions on the back. It will tell you exactly how you should store it.”

In some respects, pet food is a lot like people food. The container should be properly closed after use and stored in a cool, dry place not subject to humidity. Pet food, like people food, is subject to spoilage.

While manufacturers have a responsibility to prevent contamination of pet food before it leaves the factory, Riaz suggests consumers also have a responsibility to make sure the food is free of toxins once it is in the home. It's very possible, he says, that consumers themselves are responsible for some of the salmonella poisonings that have been reported.

Consumer responsibility

“It's definitely true,” he said. “Let me give you an example. Sometimes it is the children in the household who feed the dog. Their hands have been everywhere and can be covered with germs. Those germs can then get on the food.”

Just as you wash your hands before preparing food for people, Riaz says consumers should have clean hands when they handle their pet's food. It's a two-way street. After handling pet food you should wash your hands. If there is salmonella on the pet food, that prevents its spread elsewhere.

Unfortunately there is no easy way to tell if pet food is contaminated. However, extreme cases may be visible to a keen eye.

“Some of the toxin can be identifiable,” Riaz said. “It might be a green fungus that forms on it if the food is not properly stored. If it's very humid and not properly stored you could see a lot of fungus grow on it. Obviously you don't want to feed that to your pet.”

Another way to avoid coming in contact with contaminated food is to carefully inspect the package. In the store if you see a bag that is damaged or has a small tear, its contents could easily be contaminated. Not only should you not buy it, you should bring it to the attention of store managers so they can remove it from the shelves.

Pet food recalls seem to be on the increase. A number of brands from different manufacturers have been recalled this year because of a risk of foodborne il...

Article Image

Milo's Kitchen treats poisoned dogs, class action charges

A federal judge has refused to dismiss a class action lawsuit that charges Del Monte subsidiary Milo's Kitchen produced chicken jerky treats that poisoned and killed dogs, a claim also leveled in many ConsumerAffairs postings.

"I just had to put my beautiful Shayna down from kidney failure, and am so irate to find out that it could have been my fault feeding her something that I thought was natural and from a company I thought was trustworthy," Leslie of Davie, Fla., said in a June 2012 posting.

Del Monte recalled the "home-style" dog treats in January after the New York State Department of Agriculture found trace amounts of antibiotics in several lots of chicken jerky treats.

The lawsuit, however, concerns a more wide-ranging problem -- one that the Food and Drug Administration warned pet owners about back in 2008 and on several occasions since then. In February, the FDA said it had received reports of 360 dogs dying and 2,200 becoming ill after eating jerky treats.

Chinese chickens

Many of the suspect treats are made with chicken from China, which is not approved for human consumption but can be legally fed to pets. 

Consumers rate Del Monte Pet Foods

In the lawsuit, Lisa Mazur says that her healthy seven-year-old dog, Riley Rae, suffered kidney failure and had to be euthanized after eating the Milo's Kitchen treats, and she charges that despite the FDA warnings, Del Monte did not recall the treats or put warnings on the packages, Courthouse News Servicereported.

"Defendants intentionally concealed known facts concerning the safety of their dog treats in order to increase or maintain sales," Mazur said in the complaint.

Del Monte is one of a dozen manufacturers in a $24 million settlement in 2011 for wet pet food contaminated with melamine and cyanuric acid. The company also faces other law suits from pet owners.

The company moved to have the case dismissed in September 2012 but U.S. Magistrate Judge Maureen Kelly recommended that the case proceed and U.S. District Judge Cathy Bissoon adopted Kelly's recommendation.

 Del Monte subsidiary Milo's Kitchen cannot dismiss claims that its Chinese chicken jerky treats poisoned and killed dogs, a federal judge ruled. ...

Article Image

Bravo! Chicken Blend for Dogs and Cats recalled

Bravo! is voluntarily recalling its 2 lb tubes of Bravo! Raw Food Diet Chicken Blend for Dogs and Cats, product code: 21-102, batch ID code 6 14 12, because it has the potential to be contaminated with Salmonella.

The recall involves 2 lb. Bravo! Chicken Blend frozen raw diet tubes (chubs) made on June 14, 2012 only; no other products or sizes are involved. The recalled product should not be sold or fed to pets.

This batch tested negative by a third party independent laboratory prior to release for distribution to consumers, however routine testing by the Minnesota Department of Agriculture of product collected from a single retail location tested positive for presence of salmonella. While the testing discrepancy is unclear, Bravo said that it was issuing the recall "in an abundance of caution."

The company has received no reports of illness in either people or animals associated with this product.

The recalled product is distributed nationwide to distributors, retail stores, internet retailers and directly to consumers, and can be identified by the batch ID code 6 14 12 located on the white hang tag attached to the bottom of the plastic film tube.

Pet owners should return unopened frozen tubes of food to the store where purchased for a full refund. Pet owners should dispose of opened tubes of product in a safe manner (example, a securely covered trash receptacle) and return the washed plastic batch ID tag to the store where purchased for a full refund.

Salmonella can affect animals eating the products and there is risk to humans from handling contaminated pet products, especially if they have not thoroughly washed their hands after having contact with the products or any surfaces exposed to these products.

Healthy people infected with Salmonella should monitor themselves for some or all of the following symptoms: nausea, vomiting, diarrhea or bloody diarrhea, abdominal cramping and fever. Rarely, Salmonella can result in more serious ailments, including arterial infections, endocarditis, arthritis, muscle pain, eye irritation, and urinary tract symptoms. Consumers exhibiting these signs after having contact with this product should contact their healthcare providers.

Pets with Salmonella infections may be lethargic and have diarrhea or bloody diarrhea, fever, and vomiting. Some pets will have only decreased appetite, fever and abdominal pain. Infected but otherwise healthy pets can be carriers and infect other animals or humans. If your pet has consumed the recalled product and has these symptoms, please contact your veterinarian.

Bravo! is voluntarily recalling its 2 lb tubes of Bravo! Raw Food Diet Chicken Blend for Dogs and Cats, product code: 21-102, batch ID code 6 14 12, becaus...

Article Image

Turducken Canine Recipe patties recalled

Steve’s Real Food of Murray, UT, is recalling its 5-lb. bags of "Turducken Canine Diet -- 8-oz. patties due to potential contamination of Salmonella.

Pets with Salmonella infections may be lethargic and have diarrhea or bloody diarrhea, fever, and vomiting. Some pets will have only decreased appetite, fever and abdominal pain. Infected but otherwise healthy pets can be carriers and infect other animals or humans. If your pet has consumed the recalled product and have these symptoms, please contact your veterinarian.

No illnesses have been reported to date in connection with this problem.

The recalled Turducken Canine Diet -- 8-oz Patties in a 5-lb. bag were distributed from October 2012, to January 2013, in retail stores in Connecticut, Massachusetts, Maine, New Hampshire, New York, California, Minnesota and Tennessee.

Production of the product has been suspended while the company and the FDA continue their investigation as to the source of the problem.

The product comes in 5 lb. green and cream colored biodegradable film bags with lot number 209-10-27-13 with an expiration date of October 27, 2013.

Consumers who have purchased 5-lb. bags of Steve’s Real Food Turducken Canine Recipe are urged to return them to the place of purchase for a full refund.

Consumers with questions should contact the company at 801-540-8481 or gary@stevesrealfood.com Monday through Friday from 8:00 am – 5:00 pm MST.

Steve’s Real Food of Murray, UT, is recalling its 5-lb. bags of "Turducken Canine Diet -- 8-oz. patties due to potential contamination of Salmonella. Pet...

Article Image

Purina defends Beneful, but will dog owners bite?

Purina is defending Beneful dog food from consumers' allegations that it made their dogs ill. But whether consumers accept the explanation remains to be seen.

"We have reviewed our consumer contacts and are confident there are no product quality or safety issues with Beneful, and consumers can continue to feed Beneful with complete confidence," Beneful spokesman Keith Schopp said in a statement to ConsumerAffairs. "Purina’s quality control procedures are among the strictest—if not the strictest—in the industry, and our products are formulated by professional pet nutritionists and veterinarians."

Schopp was responding to complaints posted on ConsumerAffairs and elsewhere by pet owners who say their dogs became ill or died after eating Beneful.

While no one has been able to definitively determine whether or not Beneful or any other substance was responsible for the incidents portrayed in the consumer postings, that hasn't stopped pet owners, bloggers, reporters and others from speculating heatedly about the controversy, a process that veterinarians say doesn't accomplish much.

"These statements are not backed by any scientific studies, and the conditions described in the postings are amongst the most common conditions seen in everyday veterinary practice," said Dr. Stephen Ettinger after reviewing many of the posted consumer reports.

Ettinger, a Cornell graduate who has been a practicing veterinarian for 40 years, is a Nestlé Purina Fellow in Veterinary Medicine but is not a Purina employee. He is the editor and a contributing author of the Textbook of Veterinary Internal Medicine, a book used throughout the world by veterinary students and clinicians for peer-reviewed information on veterinary medicine, including nutritional aspects of medicine.

"When a pet is sick, pet owners often look first to the pet’s food as the cause. However, it is rare that their food is responsible for the illness," Ettinger said in an article published by DVM360.com, a trade publication for veterinarians.

"I’ve read through many of the current comments regarding Beneful and believe they do not provide any evidenced-based rationale for making such claims," Ettinger said. "[F]rom these internet descriptions, it seems possible that these animals were ill to begin with and thus the diet (Beneful or otherwise) likely had nothing to do with the illness."

"I do agree that ANY abnormalities noted by pet owners should be brought to the attention of their veterinarian, and any concerns with a particular product should immediately be brought to the attention of the manufacturer so that information can be collected and products appropriately monitored," Ettinger said. "The veterinarian and the pet owner then can decide whether to contact the FDA, as well. To date there has been no evidence that Beneful has caused any problems when fed to dogs."

Sincere but misguided?

While Purina and Ettinger seek to assure pet owners and veterinarians that there is no scientific evidence to tie Beneful to pet illnesses, others have gone after the pet owners themselves, accusing them of fabricating the complaints. Some have criticized ConsumerAffairs and other sites for posting the complaints. One blogger even suggested we made up the complaints.

We placed calls to several consumers whose complaints were recently published on our site, to verify that they had submitted the complaint and that they considered them truthful.

"Maxxie left us this morning," said Liz Korfin of North Miami Beach in her ConsumerAffairs posting. "We had the pleasure of 12 AMAZING years with an incredible doggie."

We telephoned Ms. Korfin, whose dog Max is pictured here, and got her permission to use her last name. Consumer reviews are posted to our site using just the consumer's first name but we collect additional information that is not normally published. Several of the consumers we talked to gave their permission to use their full names. Some, like Korfin, also supplied photos of their dogs to lend credibility to their postings.

"I can't say it was 100% Beneful that caused the problem but why won't someone help us -- help us figure out why all the dogs are dying?" Korfin said.  

We next contacted Katherine Hudson of Palm Harbor, Fla., who confirmed her posting, in which she said that she read complaints posted here by others when her dog began showing signs of illness and switched her to homemade food.

"I have no doubt that you saved my dog's life," Hudson said, referring to consumers who had posted their experiences on ConsumerAffairs. Hudson was less complimentary about Purina. She said Purina offered to reimburse her for some of her expenses when she called their corporate office.  

"I told them that wasn't necessary. I wasn't contacting them for money, I was giving them a heads-up," she said. Hudson also filed a report with the FDA and had heard nothing in response when we spoke on Feb. 26.

Tell the FDA?

Some who have criticized consumers for posting their complaints on sites like ours have said they should instead file a report with the FDA.

One consumer, Nina of Berrien Springs, Mich., took that advice to heart. She not only posted to ConsumerAffairs about the problems her dog Kopper had with Beneful, she also decided to file a complaint with the FDA, hoping to get some action beyond just posting her complaint publicly.

"It took me over three hours and multiple attempts to get the complaint submitted -- VERY frustrating -- so that is possibly why there's not many complaints filed," Nina said. 

Then there's Samantha Hyatt of Moore, Okla., who submitted her posting Feb. 26.  Her Westie died after exhibiting many of the symptoms described by others. 

"Yes, of course you can use my name," she said. "I want to share my experience in the hopes that we can save pets!"

Others we spoke with included Samantha Kellstrom of New Hampshire, who said her dog has been improving on a hamburger and rice diet, and Patty Hogan of Hopatcong, N.J., who said she has just passed the $500 mark in veterinary expenses but is beginning to see some improvement in her dog.

Vets get blamed

Pet owners who bundle up their sick dog and rush to their veterinarian are often dismayed to find that the vet has heard nothing about problems with Beneful. Veterinarians respond that this is because there has been no evidence of problems with Beneful products.

A review by ConsumerAffairs of the alerts sent to veterinarians by the FDA and professional organizations found nothing regarding Beneful.  

"Nothing had been provided through any of the professional channels about problems with Beneful," said Marie Steele, a Ph.D. candidate who has spent $650 so far on her ailing dog. "The vet hadn't heard a thing about it."

"My 3-year-old French Bulldog became sick two weeks ago. I took her to the vet that morning and they found her ALC Liver score was high," said Shannon Smith of Medford, Ore. "The vet keeps asking me, 'What could she be getting into?'"

Shannon told us her dog is kept inside except for short periods of time in a fenced yard, leading her to suspect that the food is the culprit.

It's not surprising the FDA has no information on it, said Steele, who said filing an online complaint with the FDA was nearly impossible because of the level of detail the online form asked for and the inability to save the form and come back to complete it later.

Timeline

Whatever is happening, if anything, it started about a year ago on Feb. 28, 2012. That's when we received the first complaint about Beneful. A total of 182 complaints were sbumitted in 2012. In the first 56 days of 2013, 275 were submitted. 

The geographic distribution of the complaints is not as uniform as one might expect. This chart shows the top 15 states for Beneful complaints to ConsumerAffairs:

Not surprisingly, most of the complaints come from the most populous states but there are far fewer complaints from California, New York, New Jersey and other megastates than would typically be the case in a nationally distributed product.

With a sample size of fewer than 500 complaints, however, it's not really possible to draw any meaningful conclusions. 

Purina's assurances

"We stand by the quality and safety of Beneful dog food," spokesman Schopp insisted. He listed these quality control measures that are applied to all Beneful products:

  • Suppliers of ingredients for Purina products must meet our stringent standards for ingredient specifications, product safety, sanitation and manufacturing practices.
  • We closely monitor and control each step of the pet food production process, from raw ingredients through finished goods.  We have a comprehensive food safety program, which is specifically designed to prevent food quality or safety issues from occurring in the first place.  HACCP (Hazard Analysis & Critical Control Points) plans and preventative controls are a standard best practice not only for pet foods, but also for human foods, and the U.S. FDA will soon require these types of preventative controls. 
  • Additionally, we conduct physical inspections and analysis of finished products to ensure they meet our quality assurance specifications.
  • We carefully monitor and review all information provided to us by consumers and can confidently state that there are no product issues with Beneful.

What to do

What should consumers do if their pet falls ill? The first step is to contact their veterinarian and take the animal in for examination as soon as possible.

If food is suspected, save all packaging and keep a sample of the food itself. Always wash your hands thoroughly after handling pet food.

The consumer or, preferably, the vet can file a report with the FDA if food or snacks are thought to be responsible. The online report form is long and complicated and many consumers find it difficult to complete, so it may be a task best left to the vet.  

Schopp said consumers should also call the manufacturer of the pet food if a problem is suspected. 

"We take all comments from consumers seriously.  We encourage any consumer with a question or comment about one of our products to call and speak with us directly at the toll free number on every package," he said.

And, while critics may question the usefulness of consumer sites, filing an online report helps make other consumers aware of issues that may affect them. Even if it turns out that some consumers may reach the wrong conclusion in their postings, sparking a public discussion helps raise awareness of the importance of monitoring pets' health -- and it's worth noting that there have been cases of contaminated pet food and snacks that have come to light through online postings. 

 A few weeks ago, we wrote about a rash of complaints from pet owners blaming Beneful for the illness and, sometimes, death of their dogs.  A...

Article Image

Neighbors raise a stink over pig ear plant implicated in numerous recalls

Dog owners have been raising a stink over some of the pet treats produced by Kasel Industries and now the company's West Denver neighbors are getting into the act as well.

The problem is the place stinks, according to more than 150 complaints the city has received in recent years. 

"Caller left message regarding terrible odor. Said he was 'throwing up'," was a typical complaint recorded last year, according to Westword, a community news site.

Pet owners outside the Denver area may not care what the place smells like but many of them are irate about products Kasel has recalled in recent years, products like:

  • Boots & Barkley pigs ears;
  • Nature's Deli chicken jerky dog treats; and
  • American Variety Pack treats, recalled today along with all other products made at the plant from April 20, 2012, thru September 19, 2012.

The recalls involve possible Salmonella contamination of the treats. This is particularly galling to pet owners who seek out pet food and treats made in the United States, hoping to avoid the dangers associated with products containing ingredients from China.

"I better start seeing this crap pulled from shelves at Petsmart... fat chance," said ConsumerAffairs reader Merri Krishnan in a Facebook posting after a batch of pig ears were recalled. 

But as Merri said, fat chance. Kasel is still operating, its products can be found in most pet stores and the neighbors are still beefing, despite the recalls and the efforts of the Food and Drug Administration and the Colorado Department of Agriculture, which have both found Salmonella in some of the company's products.

A citation

The city of Denver finally got into the act, responding last year to the neighbor's complaints. It issued an odor citation to Kasel, citing a section of Denver's air pollution ordinance and informed the plant's owner, Ray Kasel, that the fine would be $500.

Now you might say that $500 is a small price to pay for making West Denver smell like a rendering plant but Ray Kasel didn't take kindly to the citation. He filed an appeal, saying the neighbors were untrustworthy and claiming the wind was blowing the stench the other way on the days the neighbors complained.

The hearing officer was not impressed and the appeal was denied. So Kasel did what any respectable pig ear entrepreneur would do. He sued the city in federal court, claiming it was conspiring against him, harassing him and violating his constitutional property rights. He also sued various city officials and some of the complaining neighbors.

Leaving aside the legal niceties, Kasel appears to be arguing that it's not his fault that dead animals smell bad and that the nature of the neighborhood has changed since he went into business in 1986.

The West Denver neighborhood -- which for some reason is called RiNo -- was for decades an industrial area. Kasel's neighbors include a sausage factory, a company that cleans septic tanks and a corned beef plant, according to Westword. 

Probably none of these folks would say they should be run out of town just because some vacant industrial buildings have been turned into condos occupied by hipsters, artists and others not habituated to barnyard aromas.

As for pet owners looking for red-blooded American dog treats, our advice is to stick with baked snacks. Leave the pig ears out of it.

Dog owners have been raising a stink over some of the pet treats produced by Kasel Industries and now the company's West Denver neighbors are getting into ...

Article Image

Dog treat-related illnesses still puzzle the FDA

For years, pet owners have been complaining that their dogs became ill and, in many cases, died after eating jerky treats from China, many of them containing chicken. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has been investigating but in a recent update, admitted that it has not found a definitive cause.

However, the agency noted that in the past 10 years, there has been a dramatic increase in pet food imported from China, much of it containing chicken.

It turns out that Chinese consumers prefer dark meat, which leaves a lot of white chicken meat available for export. But Chinese chicken is not approved for human consumption in the U.S. because of concerns about bird flu and unsanitary conditions in Chinese factories, meaning all that white meat -- the very same meat deemed unfit for humans -- is available for use in pet food and treats.

By the FDA's count, the amount of pet food imported from China has grown 85-fold in recent years, with nearly 86 million pounds of pet food being imported in 2011.

"Pet treats, including jerky pet treats are currently considered the fastest growing segment in the pet food market," the FDA noted.

2,200 reports

The FDA says it has received about 2,200 reports of pets becoming ill or dying after eating jerky treats; 360 died. Most of those reports involved dogs, although a few cats have also become ill.

Consumers rate Waggin Train Treats

ConsumerAffairs receives a constant stream of such reports, like this one from Lucinda of Strasburg, Va.:

"After wondering why our dog was getting so sick, I started hearing about the Waggin Train Jerky Treats. I checked in her box of different treats and discovered that I have an almost empty bag of Waggin Train Jerky Tenders! I am so upset and broken hearted because my dog is dying! ... Our sweet girl is dying because of this poison!"

The majority of the cases in dogs report primarily gastrointestinal signs, including vomiting and diarrhea, sometimes with blood or mucus, and can involve severe signs such as pancreatitis or gastrointestinal bleeding.

The next most common signs relate to kidney function, including frequent urination, increased urine, severe thirst, kidney failure and some cases resemble a rare kidney related illness called Fanconi’s syndrome. 

There does not appear to be a geographic pattern to the case reports, the FDA said. Cases have been reported from all 50 states and 6 Canadian provinces in the past 18 months.

Warnings issued

The FDA has issued warnings to pet owners about the potential threat posed by tainted jerky treats from China but hasn't ordered the products off the shelves because it can't prove they are responsible for the reported illnesses.

Why is it so hard to get to the bottom of the mystery? The FDA says its investigation is "complex, multifaceted and includes a wide variety of experts at the FDA including toxicologists, epidemiologists, veterinary researchers, forensic chemists, microbiologists, field investigators and senior agency officials."

It seems pretty simple, though, to pet owners whose animals are ill. Many try to avoid pet treats from China only to learn too late that they did not read all the fine print.

"To my surprise, these treats were made in China," said Beverly of Palmetto, Fla., whose two rat terriers became ill after eating Waggin Train treats. "The packages say product of the US, but if you search hard enough you'll find 'Made in China' somewhere on the bag.

What to do

So what's a pet owner to do?

In November 2011, the agency issued a warning to pet owners that echoed a similar advisory from 2007:

“FDA is advising consumers who choose to feed their dogs chicken jerky products to watch their dogs closely for any or all of the following signs that may occur within hours to days of feeding the products: decreased appetite; decreased activity; vomiting; diarrhea, sometimes with blood; increased water consumption and/or increased urination.  If the dog shows any of these signs, stop feeding the chicken jerky product. Owners should consult their veterinarian if signs are severe or persist for more than 24 hours.”

The agency issued a similar warning just a few days ago.

Amidst all the verbiage, the advice boils down to this: if you want to feed your dog treats, make them baked cookie-type treats rather than meat jerky. But be aware that these can also cause problems in some dogs and be ready to respond if your pet shows signs of illness.

Frustrated with the lack of action, some pet owners have gone to court seeking action. Last July, a class action suit against Nestle Purina charged that the company's Waggin' Train treats had sickened their pets. 

Companies named

Most major pet food companies are included in the complaints on file at the FDA. A few of the more familiar brands identified by the agency include:

  • Milo's Kitchen;
  • Dogswell;
  • Smokehouse Pet Products Inc.;
  • Waggin' Train; and
  • Kingdom Pets.

There is, of course, no fool-proof way to avoid contaminated pet food just as there is no absolute protection against contamination in the human food supply. But sticking to baked snacks, along with carefully monitoring your pet's health and responding quickly to illness, is a good start. 

Maybe someday, the FDA will find an answer. Or, then again, maybe it will approve chicken from China for human consumption, which will at least put humans and their pets on equal footing. 

For years, pet owners have been complaining that their dogs became ill and, in many cases, died after eating jerky treats from China. The U.S. Food and Dru...

Article Image

Another Recall of Kasel Industries Dog Treats Because of Salmonella Fears

It was just a few weeks ago that FDA inspectors found Salmonella bacteria in Nature’s Deli Chicken Jerky Dog Treats at Kasel Associated Industries of Denver during a routine sampling inspection. In September, the company recalled Boots & Barkley beef bully sticks. 

Now the Colorado Department Of Agriculture says a routine sampling finds that  Boots & Barkley pigs ears and variety treats made at the Kasel plant contained the Salmonella bacteria.

The company says it has "ceased distribution of any lots that have possible contamination of the bacteria." No other products made by Kasel Associated Industries are included in the recall of the 12 count packages of Roasted Pig Ears and the 32oz Variety Pack Dog Treats.

The recalled products were sold at Target stores.

The recalled Roasted Pig Ears and Variety Pack Dog Treats were distributed nationwide through Target retail stores in August 2012. The Roasted Pig Ears product comes in a clear plastic bag containing 12 pig ears marked with UPC bar code 647263899158. The Variety Pack product also comes in a clear plastic bag weighing 32oz and marked with UPC bar code 490830400086. 

The company did not furnish any photos of the recalled products, as is customary in such cases. Located at 3315 Walnut Street in Denver, Kasel Industries maintains a low profile. 

The company's website says it started its business in 1986, "to serve the refrigeration and boiler needs of the local food processing industry." It does not mention pet food and describes itself as a manufacturer of industrial refrigeration and boiler systems as well as "new slicing equipment, primarily for the meat processing industry."

Long history

There's nothing new about this, of course. Pets have been dying of poisoned food and snacks for years and, in many cases, their owners have been infected as well. The pet food companies argue that there is no definitive diagnosis in many cases but angry pet owners say that even when they send a sample of the suspect food to the manufacturer, nothing is done.

The FDA, long lambasted by critics for being lax in policing pet and human food supplies, insists it is looking into the problem, although the agency recently took the unusual step of posting a commentary questioning the seriousness of the problem. 

Bernadette Dunham, D.V.M., Ph.D., director of the Center for Veterinary Medicine at the FDA echoed the pet food manufacturers as she wrote that it is often difficult to pin down the cause of a specific pet's malady. She urged consumers to report their pets' illnesses to the FDA but critics were not encouraged.

Earlier this year, the FDA insisted it has been "unable to determine a definitive cause of reported dog illnesses or a direct link to chicken jerky products" and said that "extensive chemical and microbial testing ... has not uncovered a contaminant or cause of illness from any chicken jerky treat."

The FDA does note that jerky and other snacks "should not be substituted for a balanced diet and are intended to be fed occasionally in small quantities."  

Sarah Alexander, the education and outreach director of Food & Water Watch, a Ralph Nader-founded consumer organization, says the FDA "has a poor track record of ensuring the safety of food from China for people and pets."

"Despite the flood of reports of dogs dying from imported dog treats going back as far as 2007, the FDA has done nothing to fix the problem," Alexander said in a recent email to the organization's supporters.

More about Pets & Pet Food

Kasel Associated Industries of Denver, CO is voluntarily recalling its BOOTS & BARKLEY ROASTED AMERICAN PIG EARS AND BOOTS & BARKLEY AMERICAN VARIE...

Article Image

FDA Finds Salmonella in Nature’s Deli Chicken Jerky Dog Treats

FDA investigators found Salmonella bacteria in Nature’s Deli Chicken Jerky Dog Treats at Kasel Associated Industries of Denver during a routine sampling inspection, the agency said today.

Once notified of the results, the company recalled and ceased distribution of its product.

The product comes in a clear plastic bag with the Nature's Deli logo containing 2.5 lbs chicken jerky marked with UPC bar code 647263800208. Kasel Industries is recalling lot number BEST BY 091913 DEN because this lot code tested positive through analysis by the FDA.

The FDA said the incident is unrelated to jerky pet treats from China that are associated with reports of illness in dogs and cats. 

Since 2007, there have been increasing numbers of illnesses in pets associated with the consumption of jerky pet treats. The majority of complaints involve chicken jerky (treats, tenders, and strips), but others include duck, sweet potato, and treats where chicken or duck jerky is wrapped around dried fruits, sweet potatoes, or yams.

The FDA said it has received approximately 2,200 reports of pet illnesses which may be related to consumption of the jerky treats. The majority of the complaints involve dogs, but cats also have been affected.

Over the past 18 months the reports have contained information on 360 canine deaths and one feline death. There does not appear to be a geographic pattern to the case reports. Cases have been reported from all 50 states and 6 Canadian provinces in the past 18 months.

ConsumerAffairs has also received thousands of reports of pet illnesses attributed by owners to food and treats. In the vast majority of cases, no definitive diagnosis is made.

Consumers rate Nutro Pet Foods

"It has only been a couple of days since I have purchased a new bag of Nutro senior dog food," Tiffany of Austin, TX, posted on ConsumerAffairs earier this week. "My dog has diarrhea and has vomited. I actually feel somewhat lucky that I came across this site. As of today, he is no longer eating Nutro brand foods."

Although the FDA said it has been actively investigating the reports of illnesses, no definitive cause has been determined.

"The ongoing global investigation is complex, multifaceted and includes a wide variety of experts at the FDA including toxicologists, epidemiologists, veterinary researchers, forensic chemists, microbiologists, field investigators and senior agency officials," the agency said in a statement. 

86 million pounds

In the past 10 years, there has been a dramatic increase in importation of pet food from China. Human consumption of poultry in China largely consists of dark meat, leaving a large amount of light meat poultry products available for export.

From 2003, when China first approached the USDA about poultry exports, to 2011, the volume of pet food exports (regulated by the FDA) to the United States from China has grown 85-fold.

It is estimated that nearly 86 million pounds of pet food came from China in 2011. Pet treats, including jerky pet treats are currently considered the fastest growing segment in the pet food market. 

FDA said it is "concerned about any food found to contain Salmonella and will post information for the public on any new bacterial outbreak that has the potential to sicken animals and humans who handle potentially contaminated products." The agency cautions consumers to thoroughly wash their hands after having contact with pet products or any surfaces exposed to these products.

Healthy people infected with Salmonella may have some or all of the following symptoms: nausea, vomiting, diarrhea or bloody diarrhea, abdominal cramping and fever. Consumers exhibiting these symptoms should contact their healthcare providers.

Pets with Salmonella infections may be lethargic and have diarrhea or bloody diarrhea, fever, and vomiting. Some pets will have only decreased appetite, fever and abdominal pain. Infected but otherwise healthy pets can be carriers and infect other animals or humans. If your pet has consumed the recalled product and has any of these signs, please contact your veterinarian.

Read more about pets

FDA investigators found Salmonella bacteria in Nature’s Deli Chicken Jerky Dog Treats at Kasel Associated Industries of Denver during a rou...

Article Image

Nature's Deli Chicken Jerky Dog Treats Recalled

Kasel Associated Industries of Denver, CO, is recalling its Nature's Deli Chicken Jerky Dog Treats product because it may be contaminated with Salmonella.

Pets with Salmonella infections may be lethargic and have diarrhea or bloody diarrhea, fever and vomiting. Some pets will have only decreased appetite, fever and abdominal pain. Infected but otherwise healthy pets can be carriers and infect other animals or humans.

If your pet has consumed the recalled product and has any of these signs, please contact your veterinarian.

The recalled Chicken Jerky Dog Treats were distributed to 57 Sam's Club locations in CO, IA, ID, IL, KS, MO, MT, NE, OK, SD, UT and WY.

The product comes in a clear plastic bag with the Nature's Deli logo containing 2.5 lbs. chicken jerky marked with UPC bar code 647263800208. Kasel Industries is recalling lot number BEST BY 091913 DEN because this lot code tested positive through analysis by the FDA.

No illnesses have been reported to date in animals or humans in connection with this product.

The company has ceased distribution of any lots that have possible contamination of the bacteria. No other products made by Kasel Associated Industries are included in the recall of 2.5 lbs. packages of Chicken Jerky Dog Treats.

Consumers who have purchased this product are urged to return it to the place of purchase for a full refund.

Anyone with questions may contact Kasel Associated Industries at (800) 218-4417 Monday thru Friday from 7am to 5pm MDT.

Kasel Associated Industries of Denver, CO, is recalling its Nature's Deli Chicken Jerky Dog Treats product because it may be contaminated with Salmonella. ...

Article Image

Breeder's Choice Recalls AvoDerm Natural Lamb Meal & Brown Rice Adult Dog

Breeder’s Choice Pet Food is recalling a single manufacturing batch of Breeder's Choice AvoDerm Natural Lamb Meal & Brown Rice Adult Dog Formula due to possible contamination with Salmonella. 

The product affected by this recall is identified below and has the following "Best Before" dates: 

Product Code/SKU/ Material #UPC CodeSizeProduct Name/DescriptionBest Before Code (day/month/yr)
10000650740 5290702043 826 lb.AvoDerm Natural Lamb Meal & Brown Rice Adult Dog Formula28 Aug 2013
29 Aug 2013
30 Aug 2013

Product and product lots that do not appear on the list above are not subject to this recall. 

Salmonella can affect animals eating the products and there is a risk to humans from handling contaminated pet products, especially if they have not thoroughly washed their hands after having contact with the products or any surfaces exposed to these products. 

Healthy people exposed to Salmonella should monitor themselves for some or all of the following symptoms: nausea, vomiting, diarrhea or bloody diarrhea, abdominal cramping and fever. Rarely, Salmonella can result in more serious ailments, including arterial infections, endocarditis, arthritis, muscle pain, eye irritation, and urinary tract symptoms. 

Pets with Salmonella infections may be lethargic and have diarrhea or bloody diarrhea, fever, and vomiting. Some pets will have only decreased appetite, fever and abdominal pain. Infected but otherwise healthy pets can be carriers and infect other animals or humans. If your pet has consumed the recalled product and has these symptoms, please contact your veterinarian. 

No human or pet illnesses have been reported to-date. 

The recall notification is being issued based on a single manufacturing batch wherein a sample with the "Best Before" dates of August 28, 29 and 30, 2012 had a positive result for salmonella. The AvoDerm Natural Lamb Meal & Brown Rice Adult Dog Formula product was originally manufactured on August 29, 2012, and distributed on August 30 and 31, 2012. Salmonella testing was conducted by Silliker, Inc. (Southern California Laboratory). 

Recalled products were distributed to retailers and distributors in California, Georgia, Illinois, Nevada, Virginia and Washington. 

Consumers who have purchased the AvoDerm Natural Lamb Meal & Brown Rice Adult Dog Formula product with the above-referenced "Best Before" dates are urged to contact Breeder's Choice Customer Service representatives. 

A letter and instructions have been forwarded to all Breeder’s Choice Pet Food customers. Breeder’s Choice Customer Service representatives and company veterinarians are responding to inquires through the 1-866-500-6286 phone number and will answer any questions regarding pets that have been fed the product. 

Breeder’s Choice Pet Food is recalling a single manufacturing batch of Breeder's Choice AvoDerm Natural Lamb Meal & Brown Rice Adult Dog Formula due to pos...

Article Image

Sick As a Dog -- It's Not Just Cantaloupes, Dog Food Is Blamed for Many Illnesses

ConsumerAffairs readers are long accustomed to stories like this one, from Jill of Lawrence, Kan.: "I picked up a bag of Nutro Max Senior to try for my aging collie. At first, I didn't see any problems, but she became progressively sick[er], throwing up at least once a day and becoming lethargic. The only thing that had changed in her life was her food.

"I stopped giving the collie this apparently toxic food, bought her familiar Science Diet, and all is well again. Shame on dog food manufacturers for not learning from the lessons of the past! We will never buy Nutro Max again."

Case closed?

Bernadette Dunham

There's no question that contaminated pet food can make pets sick, as a long history of recalls and pet illnesses and deaths indicates. But are consumers too quick to blame the food when their pet falls ill? Some veterinarians think so, including Bernadette Dunham, D.V.M., Ph.D., director of the Center for Veterinary Medicine at the U.S. Food and Drug Administration(FDA).

The FDA has been in the middle of countless disputes over whether a pet food is to blame for animal illnesses, but in a recent FDA blog posting, Dunham says it is often difficult to pin down the cause of a specific pet's malady.

She offers these suggestions to pet owners:

1. Contact your veterinarian right away if your pet gets sick. Be ready to describe the symptoms and keep track of how soon after your pet's last meal or snack they occurred.

2. Always keep the original label or packaging of whatever you are feeding your pets. If you buy a large bag of feed and scoop it into a smaller container, be sure to save the original. The FDA needs not only the brand name but the lot number and other information that is only available from the label.

3. Report the incident to the FDA, either at its website or by calling the consumer complaint coordinator in your state. Contact information is available online. 

Of course, none of this does much good for someone whose beloved pet is in extremis. It's already too late for them.

"Purina SmartBlend Lamb and Rice killed my dog," said Lisa of Wichita, Kan. She said her one of her dogs became ill and was undergoing treatment when her second dog began refusing to eat. 

"The vet came out again, gave more meds and he was doing better. That night, he died," Lisa said. "I called Purina after I began researching and found that many other dogs became sick and/or died while on this food. Of course, I heard the, 'This is the first time we have ever heard of it.' They promised to reimburse my vet fees. I am still waiting. I even sent them a sample of the food. I called not too long ago and they closed my case."

Critics: FDA is lax

Consumers rate Nutro Pet Foods

The FDA is with you all the way, Dunham assures us but not everyone agrees. Sarah Alexander, the education and outreach director of Food & Water Watch, a Ralph Nader-founded consumer organization, says the FDA "has a poor track record of ensuring the safety of food from China for people and pets."

"Despite the flood of reports of dogs dying from imported dog treats going back as far as 2007, the FDA has done nothing to fix the problem," Alexander said in a recent email to the organization's supporters.

Alexander quotes a pet owner named Rita, who experienced problems similar to those so familiar to ConsumerAffairs readers: "Heidi was a happy and healthy 8-year-old German Shepherd on May 23, 2012 when I gave her just two chicken jerky dog treats as a 'special' treat. Within two days she became ill, vomiting and diarrhea and lethargy, refusing all food but drinking water excessively. On Memorial Day, May 28, 2012, Heidi died a horrific death in my arms. The void her passing has left in my life is almost unbearable. I live alone and Heidi was my constant companion, my loyal friend, my fierce protector."

The FDA regulates the import of pet food and processed human food, but Alexander and other critics contend the agency has done too little to stop contaminated food from China from being sold in the U.S.

"This isn't the first time that tainted pet food from China has harmed our pets," Alexander noted. "Just a few years ago thousands of pets became sick and died after eating pet food contaminated with melamine, and right now there are more than 60 human food products that are banned from being imported from China because of unsafe substances, including milk products contaminated with melamine."

Alexander notes that the Food Safety Modernization Act, passed by Congress last year has not yet been implemented. And just as critics say the Obama Administration's failure to adopt the rules in a timely manner is responsible for the current outbreak of salmonella contamination in cantaloupes, it is also being blamed for the failure to adequately regulate pet food. 

President Obama signed the bill into law in January 2011 and final standards were supposed to have been enacted within 12 months. But 19 months later, the standards are in limbo, awaiting final action by -- who else? -- the FDA.

Everyday ConsumerAffairs hears stories like this one, from Jill of Lawrence, Kan.: "I picked up a bag of Nutro Max Senior to try for my aging collie. ...

Article Image

Complaints Mount About Pet Treats From China

Pet food maker Nestle Purina now faces a class-action suit by pet owners in eight states who say the company's jerky treats killed or sickened their pets.

Yet the product remains on store shelves and NBC News reports the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is unable to pinpoint a contaminant that could be causing the problem.

The original lawsuit was filed back in April by an Illinois pet owner. Six other pet owners have now joined it and are also suing the retail stores that carry the product, Walmart, Costco and Target.

Complaints

Consumers writing to ConsumerAffairs continue to report adverse results when they feed Waggin' Train treats to their pets.

“I began to notice things just weren't right with her,” Dennis, of Bellport, NY, wrote about his pug in a ConsumerAffairs post. “She had become lethargic, had loose bowel movements, and seemed to drink a lot more water than usual. When she started to not want to eat her food, I knew something was wrong. I cook everything she eats, and give her no store bought dog food, so the Wagg'n Train treats were the only thing she was given besides freshly prepared foods.”

Steve, of Franklin Park, NJ, reports he had purchased Waggin' Treats for years and that his dogs loved them. But last month, his Westie suddenly got sick after eating them and died.

“My regular vet ran several logical tests – but came up clueless as to what was causing his lethargy, lack of eating, and vomiting,” Steve wrote. “He thought it was colitis – so we tried antibiotics. That made my “Max” feel no better – even worse. He was then tested for Addison’s Disease. Nope – that was not it, as well.”

Common link?

Both Steve and Dennis noted that they prepared their dog's food themselves, which might suggest the animals has particularly sensitive digestive systems. Whether that's a possible contributing factor is unknown.

Since last November the FDA has been cautioning pet owners about chicken jerky products for dogs. The FDA notes that it has seen an increase in the number of complaints about the products, but as yet it does not know why.

“FDA is advising consumers who choose to feed their dogs chicken jerky products to watch their dogs closely for any or all of the following signs that may occur within hours to days of feeding the products: decreased appetite; decreased activity; vomiting; diarrhea, sometimes with blood; increased water consumption and/or increased urination,” the FDA says on its site. “If the dog shows any of these signs, stop feeding the chicken jerky product. Owners should consult their veterinarian if signs are severe or persist for more than 24 hours.”

The FDA says the illnesses may not be associated with the jerky treats and that it continues to investigate the origin of the animals' sickness.

Pet food maker Nestle Purina now faces a class-action suit by pet owners in eight states who say the company's jerky treats killed or sickened their pets....

Article Image

Diamond Pet Food Expands Its Dog Food Recall

Diamond Pet Foods is expanding a recall to include its Diamond Naturals Small Breed Adult Dog Lamb & Rice Formula dry dog food manufactured on Aug. 26, 2011 due to potential exposure to Salmonella. No illnesses have been reported.

The product was distributed in the following states:  Colorado, Illinois, Kentucky, Louisiana, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas and Wisconsin. Further distribution through other pet food channels may have occurred. 

Pet owners may call toll-free at 1-866-918-8756, Monday through Sunday, 8 am – 6 pm EST. 

The product is Diamond Naturals Small Breed Adult Dog Lamb & Rice Formula. Only samples, 6 pound and 18 pound bag sizes are affected.

Production Code & Best Before Date            
DSL0801, 20-Oct.-2012 (Product manufactured on Aug. 26, 2011 and packaged on Oct. 20, 2011) DSL0801, 26-Aug-2012        
DSL0801, 27-Sept- 2012 (Product manufactured on Aug. 26, 2011 and packaged on Sept. 27, 2011)
DSL0801, 18-Oct- 2012 (Product manufactured on Aug. 26, 2011 and packaged on Oct. 18, 2011)
DSL0801, (Samples)

Pets with Salmonella infections may have decreased appetite, fever and abdominal pain. If left untreated, pets may be lethargic and have diarrhea, fever and vomiting. Infected but otherwise healthy pets can be carriers and infect other animals or humans. If your pet has consumed the recalled product and has these symptoms, please contact your veterinarian.

Individuals handling dry pet food can become infected with Salmonella, especially if they have not thoroughly washed their hands after having contact with surfaces exposed to this product. People who believe they may have been exposed to Salmonella should monitor themselves for some or all of the following symptoms: nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, abdominal cramping and fever.

According to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control, people who are more likely to be affected by Salmonella include infants, children younger than 5 years old, organ transplant patients, people with HIV/AIDS and people receiving treatment for cancer.

Diamond Pet Foods is expanding a recall to include its Diamond Naturals Small Breed Adult Dog Lamb & Rice Formula dry dog food manufactured on Aug. 26,...

Article Image

Pet Food Recalls Spread

Add Canidae, Wellpet, Natural Balance and Apex to the list of pet food manufacturers recalling dry pet food because of Salmonella contamination. Diamond Pet Foods recalled its Puppy Formula and Chicken Soup flavors last week.  

The recalls follow the discovery of Salmonella at Diamond Pet Food's Gaston, South Carolina facility. Diamond earlier recalled several of its dry dog foods and federal officials said at least 14 people have been infected with Salmonella, apparently after coming into contact with the contaminated pet food.

It's the same South Carolina plant that a few years ago produced Nutra Nuggets and other dog foods contaminated with aflatoxin, a mold, which was blamed for the death of dozens of dogs. In 2008, Diamond agreed to a $3.1 million settlement to compensate dog owners.

It often comes as a surprise to consumers to learn that their trusted brand of pet food is manufactured, at least partly, at the same plant as other brands. Manufacturers keep costs down by outsourcing at least part of their production process, adding proprietary flavorings or ingredients to differentiate their products from the competition.

The recalls are a major embarrassment for companies that promote their products as being more "natural" than their competitors.

Peace of mind

"As a pet parent myself, I know how important peace of mind is when it comes to the health of our pets, and that is why we require that all of our products undergo testing forSalmonella, among other things," said Tim Callahan, chief executive officer of WellPet, the maker of Wellness products. "All of these lots tested negative prior to being released for sale. We are voluntarily taking this additional step to further safeguard our dogs and to put our customers’ minds at ease."

Callahan said the majority of Wellness natural products for pets are produced in WellPet's own facility in Mishawaka, Indiana, and he said WellPet "no longer purchases any products from Diamond Pet Foods."

On April 2, 2012, the Michigan Department of Agriculture and Rural Development detected Salmonella in an unopened bag of Diamond Naturals Lamb Meal & Rice dry dog food, which had been collected March 14, 2012, during routine retail testing of dry pet food, the CDC said. A sample of Diamond Puppy Formula dry dog food collected by FDA during an inspection at the South Carolina production facility has also yielded Salmonella.

Public health investigators identified recent cases of human illness matching the Salmonella Infantis strain found in the unopened bag of dry dog food produced by Diamond Pet Foods. In interviews, ill persons answered questions about contact with animals and foods consumed during the week before becoming ill. Seven of ten reported contact with a dog in the week before becoming ill.

More illnesses are likely to be discovered in the coming weeks as records are collected and analyzed from health departments around the country.

Danger to humans

If you're a pet owner, health officials say it's important to be careful handling pet food and pet dishes.  You should wash your hands thoroughly after handling pet food.  Pet food and feeding dishes should be kept out of the reach of children.  Dishes should be washed often and thoroughly.

Pets with Salmonella infections may have decreased appetite, fever and abdominal pain. If left untreated, pets may be lethargic and have diarrhea or bloody diarrhea, fever and vomiting. Infected but otherwise healthy pets can be carriers and infect other animals or humans. If your pet has consumed the recalled product and has these symptoms, please contact your veterinarian.

Individuals handling dry pet food can become infected with Salmonella, especially if they have not thoroughly washed their hands after having contact with surfaces exposed to this product. People who believe they may have been exposed to Salmonella should monitor themselves for some or all of the following symptoms: nausea, vomiting, diarrhea or bloody diarrhea, abdominal cramping and fever.

According to the Centers for Disease Control, people who are more likely to be affected by Salmonella include infants, children younger than 5 years old, organ transplant patients, people with HIV/AIDS and people receiving treatment for cancer.

Add Canidae, Wellpet and Natural Balance to the list of pet food manufacturers recalling dry pet food because of Salmonella contamination.The recalls fol...

Article Image

Canidae Recalls Dry Pet Food

Canidae Pet Foods announced today that it is issuing a voluntary recall of certain dry pet food formulas manufactured between December 9, 2011, and January 31, 2012 at the Diamond Pet Food Gaston, South Carolina plant.

Although there have been no animal or human illnesses related to Canidae Pet Food, and the product has not tested positive for Salmonella, the company has voluntarily initiated this recall out of caution to ensure the health and safety of consumers and their pets.

The below list of product with production codes that must have both a number “3” in the 9th position AND an “X” in the 10th or 11th position with best before dates of December 9, 2012, through January 31, 2013 which are being recalled.

  • Canidae Dog, All Life Stages
  • Canidae Dog, Chicken Meal & Rice
  • Canidae Dog, Lamb Meal & Rice
  • Canidae Dog, Platinum

Following is an example of how to read the production code and best before date:

The recall affects only products distributed in the following Eastern U.S. states which were manufactured at the Diamond Pet Food Gaston, South Carolina plant. Further distribution to other pet food channels may occur:

Florida, Massachusetts, New York, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Tennessee

Canidae Pet Foods apologizes for any potential issues this may have caused pet owners and their pets.

Pet owners who are unsure if the product they purchased is included in the recall, or who would like a replacement product or a refund, may contact Canidae Pet Foods via a toll free call at 1-800-398-1600, Monday through Friday, 9 am – 5 pm PST. Consumers may also go to canidae.com for more information. The company is working with distributors and retailers to ensure all products affected by this voluntary recall are removed from shelves.

Canidae Pet Foods announced today that it is issuing a voluntary recall of certain dry pet food formulas manufactured between December 9, 2011, and January...

Article Image

WellPet Recalls Dry Dog Food

WellPet LLC announced a voluntary recall of one recipe of Wellness® dry dog food after being notified by Diamond Pet Foods regarding the presence of Salmonella in Diamond’s Gaston, South Carolina facility.

The products involved in this voluntary recall are:

Wellness Complete Health® Super5Mix® Large Breed Puppy, 15 lb. and 30 lb. bags and 5 oz. sample bags with best by dates of JAN 9 2013 through JAN 11 2013.

Best by dates (lot codes) can be found on the back of the bag in the bottom right-hand corner.

No other WellPet recipes, sizes or brands of food are impacted by this voluntary recall

All Wellness products are tested for Salmonella and all lots tested negative prior to shipping to customers. The company is voluntarily recalling the select products below. This voluntary recall is being done out of an abundance of caution as these products were produced at the facility that has been linked to recent recalls of Diamond brand foods due to the threat of Salmonella.

Pets with Salmonella infections may have decreased appetite, fever and abdominal pain. If left untreated, pets may be lethargic and have diarrhea or bloody diarrhea, fever and vomiting. Infected but otherwise healthy pets can be carriers and infect other animals or humans. If your pet has consumed the recalled product and has these symptoms, please contact your veterinarian.

Individuals handling dry pet food can become infected with Salmonella, especially if they have not thoroughly washed their hands after having contact with surfaces exposed to this product. People who believe they may have been exposed to Salmonella should monitor themselves for some or all of the following symptoms: nausea, vomiting, diarrhea or bloody diarrhea, abdominal cramping and fever. According to the Centers for Disease Control, people who are more likely to be affected by Salmonella include infants, children younger than 5 years old, organ transplant patients, people with HIV/AIDS and people receiving treatment for cancer.

"As a pet parent myself, I know how important peace of mind is when it comes to the health of our pets, and that is why we require that all of our products undergo testing forSalmonella, among other things," said Tim Callahan, chief executive officer of WellPet, the maker of Wellness® products. "All of these lots tested negative prior to being released for sale. We are voluntarily taking this additional step to further safeguard our dogs and to put our customers’ minds at ease."

The majority of Wellness natural products for pets are produced in WellPet's own modern state-of-the-art manufacturing facility in Mishawaka, Indiana. WellPet no longer purchases any products from Diamond Pet Foods.

Pet owners who are unsure if the product they purchased is included in the recall, would like replacement product or have additional questions, may call us at (877) 227-9587 (Monday – Friday, 8:00 AM through 6:00 PM Eastern time and Saturday and Sunday, 9:00 AM through 5:00 PM Eastern time).

WellPet LLC announced a voluntary recall of one recipe of Wellness® dry dog food after being notified by Diamond Pet Foods regarding the presence of&nb...

Article Image

Diamond Pet Food Linked to Samonella Outbreak in Humans

Federal officials say at least 14 people have been infected with Salmonella Infantis, apparently from contact with dry pet food produced by Diamond Pet Foods.

Public health investigators say they used DNA "fingerprints" to identify the strain of Salmonella, matching several of the cases with dry pet food produced at a Diamond plant in South Carolina. Illness in humans has been reported in nine states, including Alabama, Connecticut, Michigan, Missouri, North Carolina, New Jersey, Ohio, Pennsylvania and Virginia.

The illnesses began between October 8, 2011 and April 22, 2012, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Ill persons range in age from less than one year old to 82 years old. Seventy-seven percent of patients are female. Among the 9 patients with available information, five were hospitalized. No deaths have been reported. The CDC cautioned that there may be cases that have not been reported, including any illness that occurred after April 1.

Lamb meal

On April 2, 2012, the Michigan Department of Agriculture and Rural Development detected Salmonella in an unopened bag of Diamond Naturals Lamb Meal & Rice dry dog food, which had been collected March 14, 2012, during routine retail testing of dry pet food, the CDC said.

Public health investigators identified recent cases of human illness matching the Salmonella Infantis strain found in the unopened bag of dry dog food produced by Diamond Pet Foods. In interviews, ill persons answered questions about contact with animals and foods consumed during the week before becoming ill. Seven of ten reported contact with a dog in the week before becoming ill.

Of five ill persons who could recall the type of dog food with which they had contact, four identified dry dog food produced by Diamond Pet Foods that may have been produced at a single facility in South Carolina.

As part of this outbreak investigation, Ohio public health and agriculture officials collected and tested dry dog food produced by Diamond Pet Foods. The outbreak strain of Salmonella Infantis was isolated from an opened bag of Diamond Brand Chicken Soup for the Pet Lover's Soul Adult Light Formula dry dog food collected from the home of an ill person, and an unopened bag of the product collected from a retail store.

A sample of Diamond Puppy Formula dry dog food collected by FDA during an inspection at the South Carolina production facility has also yielded Salmonella.

The investigation is continuing to determine if other brands of dry dog food produced at this facility may be linked to human illnesses. 

Federal officials say at least 14 people have been infected with Salmonella Infantis. apparently from contact with dry pet food produced by Diamond Pet Foo...

Article Image

Diamond Expands Recall to Include Puppy Formula Dry Dog Food

Diamond Pet Foods is expanding a voluntary recall to include Diamond Puppy Formula dry dog food. The company took this precautionary measure because sampling revealed Salmonella in the product. No dog illnesses have been reported.

Salmonella can affect animals eating the products and there is risk to humans from handling contaminated pet products, especially if they have not thoroughly washed their hands after having contact with the products or any surfaces exposed to these products.

People infected with Salmonella should monitor themselves for some or all of the following symptoms: nausea, vomiting, diarrhea or bloody diarrhea, abdominal cramping and fever. Rarely, Salmonella can result in more serious ailments, including arterial infections, endocarditis, arthritis, muscle pain, eye irritation, and urinary tract symptoms. Consumers exhibiting these signs after having contact with this product should contact their healthcare providers.

Pets with Salmonella infections may be lethargic and have diarrhea or bloody diarrhea, fever, and vomiting. Some pets will have only decreased appetite, fever and abdominal pain. Infected but otherwise healthy pets can be carriers and infect other animals or humans. If your pet has consumed the recalled product and has these symptoms, please contact your veterinarian.

Only the Diamond Puppy Formula products meeting the following descriptions are recalled:

DescriptionSizeProduction CodeBest By Date
Diamond Puppy Formula dry dog food                 40 lb.                DPP0401B22XJW      6-Apr-2013
Diamond Puppy Formula dry dog food                 40 lb.                DPP0401A21XAW     6-Apr-2013
Diamond Puppy Formula dry dog food                 40 lb.                DPP0101C31XME      11-Jan-2013
Diamond Puppy Formula dry dog food                 40 lb.                DPP0401B21XDJ       7-Apr-2013
Diamond Puppy Formula dry dog food                 20 lb.                DPP0401B22XJW      6-Apr-2013
Diamond Puppy Formula dry dog food                 20 lb.                DPP0101C31XME      11-Jan-2013
Diamond Puppy Formula dry dog food                 20 lb.                DPP0101C31XRB       11-Jan-2013
Diamond Puppy Formula dry dog food                 8 lb.                  DPP0401B2XALW      7-Apr-2013
Diamond Puppy Formula dry dog food                 6 oz. samples DPP0401

The recalled Diamond Puppy Formula dry dog food was manufactured by Diamond Pet Foods in Gaston, S.C., and distributed in the following 12 states:

  • Alabama
  • Florida
  • Georgia
  • Kentucky
  • Maryland
  • Michigan
  • North Carolina
  • Ohio
  • Pennsylvania
  • South Carolina
  • Tennessee
  • Virginia

The product may have been further distributed to additional states through pet food channels. The company is working directly with distributors and retailers that carry these products to remove them as quickly as possible from the supply chain. Diamond Pet Foods apologizes for any potential issues this may cause pet owners and their dogs. 

Pet owners, who are unsure if the product they purchased is included in the recall, or who would like replacement product or a refund, may contact Diamond Pet Foods at800-442-0402, 8 am – 6 pm EST, Monday through Friday, or visit www.diamondpetrecall.com.

Diamond Pet Foods is expanding a voluntary recall to include Diamond Puppy Formula dry dog food. The company took this precautionary measure because sampli...

Article Image

Pet Owners Should Be Aware of Salmonella Threats

The news that Diamond Pet Foods is recalling its Diamond Naturals Lamb Meal & Rice dry dog food because it may be contaminated with salmonella should be a reminder for pet owners. Salmonella and foodborne illnesses can affect your pets, just like humans.

In the case of Diamond, the company said it has received no reports of people or animals getting sick. But it notes that pets who do get salmonella may have decreased appetite, fever, diarrhea, vomiting and abdominal pain. Those symptoms are often cited by consumers describing their pets after eating a variety of commercial pet foods.

"Just got a female English bulldog about two weeks ago," Brandi, of Canon, Ga., wrote in a ConsumerAffairs post. "After a week she started gasping and vomiting , then my male started. The only thing that has changed was the food that I recently bought."

It may not be what you think

When consumers report these often life-threatening ailments to their pets, they assume that there is some ingredient in the dog food that is causing the illness. Other consumers report feeding their pets the same brand with no ill effect. In many cases, the problem may not be the food itself, but simply that it has become contaminated with salmonella or some other bacteria.

“The problem of salmonella in pet foods and pet treats, even in pet supplements like vitamins, is something people should be aware of,” Dr. Casey Barton Behravesh, a veterinary epidemiologist at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention., told the New York Times last August.

Last fall the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) began a stepped-up program of testing pet food samples for salmonella, mainly to prevent exposure to humans who handle the food. But pet owners are arguing more should be done to protect food given to animals.

Pay attention to recalls

The Humane Society says pet owners should remain vigilant about pet food recalls, when they occur, such as the one just announced by Diamond. The company has recalled:

  • 6-pound bag with the production code DLR0101D3XALW and best before Jan. 4, 2013;
  • 20-pound bag with the production code DLR0101C31XAG and best before Jan. 3, 2013;
  • 40-pound bag with the production code DLR0101C31XMF and best before Jan. 3, 2013;
  • 40-pound bag with the production code DLR0101C31XAG and best before Jan. 3, 2013;
  • 40-pound bag with the production code DLR0101D32XMS and best before Jan. 4, 2013.

 If your pet's food or treats are recalled, the Humane Society says you should immediately stop feeding the product to your pet. Recalled products may be returned to the store where they were purchased for a full refund or thrown away in a secure area not accessible to animals. If you have questions about recalled food or treats or require additional information contact the company that manufactures the product.

If your pet may have consumed a recalled product, consult your veterinarian, even if your pet does not appear to have any symptoms. If your pet has become ill or died because of a recalled food or treat, please you should report it to the FDA Consumer Complaint Coordinator in your state.

The news that Diamond Pet Foods is recalling its Diamond Naturals Lamb Meal & Rice dry dog food because it may be contaminated with salmonella should be a ...

Article Image

Dog Owners Blame Jerky Treats for Their Pets' Health Problems

Any dog owner will tell you that dogs will eat just about anything. But that doesn't mean they should.  It's up to dog owners to be sure they're feeding their furry friends a balanced, healthy diet. 

Just like humans, dogs shouldn't gorge themselves on treats and snacks at the expense of healtheir fare. 

Snacks are often blamed, fairly or not, for canine health problems. One brand that's currently taking heat from dog owners is Waggin Train, which makes chicken jerky and other snack products.

"After wondering why our dog was getting so sick, I started hearing about the Waggin Train Jerky Treats. I checked in her box of different treats and discovered that I have an almost empty bag of Waggin Train Jerky Tenders!" said Lucinda of Strasburg, Va., in one of many similar  ConsumerAffairs postings. "I am so upset and broken hearted because my dog is dying! ... Our sweet girl is dying because of this poison!"

Waggin' Train insists its snacks are "made of premium chicken breast fillets" and says the "high-protein, low-fat treats are slow-cooked to seal in the natural flavors for a healthy and wholesome snack."

FDA indecisive

But if the snacks are so healthy, why are dogs getting so sick? Unfortunately, there is no definitive answer.  The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has been studying the situation for years and still has not reached a conclusion.

The agency says it has been "unable to determine a definitive cause of reported dog illnesses or a direct link to chicken jerky products" and says that "extensive chemical and microbial testing ... has not uncovered a contaminant or cause of illness from any chicken jerky treat, including Waggin' Train treats."

The FDA does note that jerky and other snacks "should not be substituted for a balanced diet and are intended to be fed occasionally in small quantities."  

"It breaks my heart to know I was giving treats to my dog that killed him," said Vivian of Macomb, MI, who said her four-year-old Golden Retriever died after being fed Waggin Train treats.  "I took him to vet and liver enzymes were off the chart."

Unsympathetic

Many pet owners who've written to ConsumerAffairs have complained that Waggin' Train was unsympathetic to their complaints.

"I gave my Shih Tzu a Waggin Train' Big Blast Treat yesterday and this morning she was very sick. She trembled and cried for over an hour. When I called the complaint hotline, they acted like it was no big deal," said Marsha of Adrian, MI. 

Besides making sure their pets are eating a healthy and well-balanced diet and getting plenty of exercise, dog owners might want to scan the reviews about various pet foods in the ConsumerAffairs Pet Care section, where it quickly becomes obvious that some pet food companies are more responsive to consumer concerns than others.

More responsive

Tiffany of Marblehead, Ohio, recently complained that her dog had refused to eat her Natural Balance food. She complained to Natural Balance, which refunded her money and suggested she try another bag.

"I did receive an email from a representative at Natural Balance asking me to contact her, and did so today. The representative was very pleasant," Tiffany said. "She feels that my dog has decided she doesn't like this food any longer. She said no significant changes have taken place with the Natural Balance formula, and that she has not had any other complaints. She is mailing me a voucher of one of the different formulas to try, and we will try it."

A cat owner, David of Optional, Ohio, posted a ConsumerAffairs complaint saying his cats had gotten sick eating Natural Balance. 

"Natural Balance voluntarily contacted me to understand my issue. We discussed the situation and settled on the fact that the bag of food may have been expired as they had not had other complaints about any batches of the salmon formula being bad. I was impressed with the way they handled the issue. I'm now using Natural Balance again," David said.

Shirley of Rhinelander, WI said that after her complaint was posted, Natural Balance contacted her and sent her a voucher for another bag of dog food.
"They also sent a label to have the food shipped back to the company that I purchased for testing. They told me they would share the results when they had them," Shirley said. "The person I talked with was very pleasant and called and talked with my vet. She then called me back with inconclusive reports and said my vet could not pin it on the dog food that was making my Hannah sick."

Any dog owner will tell you that dogs will eat just about anything. But that doesn't mean they should.  It's up to dog owners to be sure they're feedi...

Dog Power Dog Food Recalled

Advanced Animal Nutrition has announced a voluntary recall of its dry Dog Power Dog Food due to aflatoxin levels that were detected above the acceptable limit. The affected products were manufactured between Jan. 4, 2011, and Nov. 18, 2011.

No illnesses have been reported in association with these products to date, and no other Advanced Animal Nutrition pet food products are involved in this recall. Affected products are:

  • DOG POWER ADULT MAINTENANCE FORMULA 21-12 Dog Food, 50 pound bags
  • DOG POWER HUNTERS FORMULA 27-14 Dog Food, 50 pound bags
  • DOG POWER HI-PRO PERFORMANCE FORMULA 26-18 Dog Food, 50 pound bags

The recall only applies to the above products with the following Packaging Date Codes (lot numbers):  K0004 through K1322.

The affected dry dog food products were distributed in the following states – Missouri, Arkansas, and Louisiana.  Retailers have already been instructed to remove the affected brands and products from store shelves.

Consumers are urged to return affected products – whether in opened or unopened packages – to their place of purchase for a full refund.  For more information, contact 866-648-7646.

Aflatoxin is a naturally occurring mold byproduct.  Pets that have consumed any of the above recalled products and exhibit symptoms of illness including sluggishness or lethargy combined with a reluctance to eat, vomiting, yellowish tint to the eyes or gums, or diarrhea should be seen by a veterinarian.

Advanced Animal Nutrition has announced a voluntary recall of its dry Dog Power Dog Food due to aflatoxin levels that were detected abo...

Article Image

Pet Food Seen as Human Salmonella Risk

You don't want Spike getting salmonella from his dog food -- and you most certainly don't want to get it yourself.  Yet the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) says it's increasingly concerned about humans getting sick from exposure to contaminated pet food.

The agency says it is increasing its inspections of dry pet food and pet treats from distributors, wholesalers and retailers.  There've been numerous recalls of pet food tainted by salmonella and other contaminants in recent years.

While humans usually get salmonella poisoning by eating contaminated food, it's also possible to pick up the disease by handling contaminated pet food.  In January 2006, at least 70 people were sickened by selmonella-tainted pet food from a Pennsylvania plant.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) says pet owners should be sure to wash their hands after feeding their pets.  

What to do

Here are some more pointers from the CDC:

Purchase Tip

  • Purchase products (canned or bagged) with no visible signs of damage to the packaging, such as dents, tears, or discolorations.

Preparation Tips

  • Washing hands is the most important step to prevent illness. Wash your hands for 20 seconds with water and soap right after handling pet food and treats, and especially before preparing, serving or eating food, drinks or preparing baby bottles
  • Preferably, people should feed their pet in areas other than the kitchen.
  • Wash pet food bowls, dishes and scooping utensils with soap and hot water regularly. Avoid washing these items in the kitchen sink or bathtubs to prevent cross-contamination. In households where there is no alternative, the sink area should be adequately sanitized after these items have been cleaned and removed.
  • Infants should not be bathed in kitchen sinks because of the risk of cross-contamination.
  • Do not use the pet’s feeding bowl as a scooping utensil – use a clean, dedicated scoop, spoon, or cup.

Storage Tips

  • Pet food should not be handled or stored in areas where food for humans is prepared.
  • If possible, store dry pet food in its original bag inside a clean, dedicated plastic container with a lid, keeping the top of the bag folded or closed.
  • Promptly refrigerate or discard unused, leftover wet pet food and containers (e.g., cans, pouches). Refrigerating foods quickly prevents the growth of most harmful bacteria. Refrigerators should be set at 40 degrees F. The accuracy of the setting should be checked occasionally with a refrigerator thermometer.
  • Dry pet food and pet treats should be stored in a cool, dry place under 80 degrees F.

Follow these simple guidelines to prevent getting a Salmonella infection from your pet:

  • After contact with animals, their food, or their environments, wash your hands well with soap and running water.
  • Clean up after your pet. If you have a cat, scoop the litter box daily and dispose of the stool in a tightly sealed plastic bag. If you have a dog, clean up the stool while on walks or from the yard daily and dispose of the stool in a tightly sealed plastic bag.
  • Children younger than 5 years of age should not be allowed to touch or eat pet food, treats, or supplements and should be kept away from pet feeding areas. Young children are especially at risk for illness because their immune systems are still developing and because they are more likely than others to put their fingers or other items into their mouths.

You don't want Spike getting salmonella from his dog food -- and you most certainly don't want to get it yourself.  Yet the Food and Drug Administrati...

Article Image

Purina ONE Vibrant Maturity 7+ Dry Cat Food Recalled

Nestlé Purina PetCare Company is recalling a limited number of 3.5- and 7-pound bags of its Purina ONE Vibrant Maturity 7+ Dry Cat Food from a single production run and shipped to customers in 12 states in December 2010. 

This is being done because some bags of the product have been found to be contaminated with Salmonella.  Only Purina ONE Vibrant Maturity 7+ Dry Cat Food with both the “Best By” date and the production code shown are included in this voluntary recall : 

Product Name

Bag size

“Best By” Date &Production Code*

Bag UPC Code

Purina ONE Vibrant Maturity 7+

3.5 lb.

   MAY 2012  03341084

17800 01885

Purina ONE Vibrant Maturity 7+  

3.5 lb.

MAY 2012  03351084

17800 01885

Purina ONE Vibrant Maturity 7+

7 lb.    

MAY 2012  03341084

17800 01887

Purina ONE Vibrant Maturity 7+  

7 lb.    

   MAY 2012  03351084

17800 01887

*”Best By” Date and Production Code are found on the back or bottom of the bag.

The product was distributed to customers located in California, Iowa, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, North Dakota, Nebraska, Ohio and Wisconsin, who may have further distributed the product to other states.

Nestlé Purina PetCare Company became aware of the contamination as a result of samples that had been collected in several retail stores.

No additional Purina cat or dog products are involved in this voluntary recall.  No other Purina ONE brand products are involved.   Only Purina ONE Vibrant Maturity 7+ brand products which match the “Best By” dates and production code above are included in this recall.

Consumers who have purchased Purina ONE Vibrant Maturity 7+ Dry Cat Food products with these specific “Best By” Date and Production Codes should discontinue feeding the product and discard it.

Salmonella can affect animals eating the product, and there is a risk to humans from handling contaminated products.  People handling contaminated dry pet food can become infected with Salmonella, especially if they have not thoroughly washed their hands after having contact with surfaces exposed to this product.  Healthy people infected with Salmonella should monitor themselves for the following symptoms:  nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, abdominal cramping and fever.  Rarely, Salmonella can result in more serious ailments including arterial infections, endocarditis, arthritis, muscle pain, eye irritation and urinary tract symptoms.  Consumers exhibiting these signs after having contact with this product should contact their healthcare providers.

Pets with Salmonella infections may exhibit decreased appetite, fever and abdominal pain.  If left untreated, pets may be lethargic and have diarrhea or bloody diarrhea, fever and vomiting.  Infected but otherwise healthy pets can be carriers and infect other animals or humans.  If you pet has consumed the recalled product and has these symptoms, please contact your veterinarian.

For further information or to obtain a product refund, please call NPPC toll-free at 1-800-982-6559 or visit www.purina.com.

Nestlé Purina PetCare Company is recalling a limited number of 3.5- and 7-pound bags of its Purina ONE Vibrant Maturity 7+ Dry Cat Food from a singl...

Purina Recalls Dry Cat Food in Three States

Nestlé Purina PetCare Company (NPPC) is voluntarily recalling approximately 870 bags of dry cat food shipped to Colorado, Idaho and Oregon. This is being done as a precautionary measure, as the product has the potential to be contaminated with Salmonella. Only the following products with both the "Best By" date and production codes shown are included in this voluntary recall:  

Product NameBag Size"Best By" Date & Production Code*Bag UPC Code
Cat Chow Naturals Dry Cat Foot6.3 lb.AUG 2012 10331083 1317800 11320
Friskies Grillers Blend Dry Cat Food3.15 lb.AUG 2012 10381083 0650000 08450
Friskies Grillers Blend Dry Cat Food16 lb.AUG 2012 10381083 0650000 57578

 *"Best By" Date and Production Code is found on the back or bottom of the bag.

The bags of dry cat food in this recall were distributed in error in February, 2011 to a small number of customers in Colorado, Idaho and Oregon, which may have further distributed the product to other Western states. There have been no consumer complaints and no reports of illness.

No additional Purina cat or dog products are involved. Only products which match the "Best By" date and production codes above are involved.

Consumers who have purchased any of these dry cat food products with these "Best By" Dates and Production Codes should discard it.

Salmonella can affect animals eating the product and there is a risk to humans from handling contaminated products. People handling contaminated dry pet food can become infected with Salmonella, especially if they have not thoroughly washed their hands after having contact with surfaces exposed to this product. Healthy people infected with Salmonella should monitor themselves for the following symptoms: nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, abdominal cramping and fever. Rarely, Salmonella can result in more serious ailments including arterial infections, endocarditis, arthritis, muscle pain, eye irritation and urinary tract symptoms. Consumers exhibiting these signs after having contact with this product should contact their healthcare providers.

Pets with Salmonella infections may exhibit decreased appetite, fever and abdominal pain. If left untreated, pets may be lethargic and have diarrhea or bloody diarrhea, fever and vomiting. Infected but otherwise healthy pets can be carriers and infect other animals or humans. If your pet has consumed the recalled product and has these symptoms, please contact your veterinarian.

For further information or to obtain a product refund, please call NPPC toll-free at 1-800-982-6559 weekdays 7 a.m. to 7 p.m. Central Time, or visit www.purina.com.

Nestlé Purina PetCare Company (NPPC) is voluntarily recalling approximately 870 bags of dry cat food shipped to Colorado, Idaho and Oregon. This is ...

Article Image

Jr. Texas Taffy Pet Treats Recalled

Merrick Pet Care, Inc. of Amarillo, Texas is recalling the Jr. Texas Taffy pet treat (ITEM # 27077, UPC # 02280827077, All Lots up to and including 10364) because they have the potential to be contaminated withSalmonella.  Merrick Pet Care has made the decision to recall all Jr. Texas Taffy pet treats in the abundance of caution. Salmonella can affect animals and there is risk to humans from handling contaminated pet products.

People handling the treats can become infected withSalmonella, especially if they have not thoroughly washed their hands after having contact with the chews or any surfaces exposed to these products.  Consumers should dispose of these products in a safe manner by securing them in a covered trash receptacle. 

Healthy people infected with Salmonella should monitor themselves for some or all of the following symptoms: nausea, vomiting, diarrhea or bloody diarrhea, abdominal cramping and fever. Rarely, Salmonella can result in more serious ailments, including arterial infections, endocarditis, arthritis, muscle pain, eye irritation, and urinary tract symptoms. Consumers exhibiting these signs after having contact with this product should contact their healthcare providers immediately.

Pets with Salmonella infections may be lethargic and have diarrhea or bloody diarrhea, fever, and vomiting. Some pets will have only decreased appetite, fever and abdominal pain. Infected but otherwise healthy pets can be carriers and infect other animals or humans. If your pet has consumed the recalled product and has these symptoms, please contact your veterinarian immediately.

TheJr. Texas Taffy was shipped to distributors and retailers throughout the US.  These individuals have been notified and have activated their recall procedures.

No illnesses have been reported to date.

Consumers who have purchased the Jr. Texas Taffy are urged to return the unused portion to the place of purchase for a full refund. Consumers with questions may contact the company at 1-800-664-7387 M-F 8:00am – 5:00pm CST.

Jr. Texas Taffy Pet Treats Recalled. Possible Salmonella contamination feared....

Woman Says Friskies Killed Her Cat

A Florida woman is blaming Friskies cat food for the death of her beloved Smokey.

Kim Herget, of New Port Richey, told local news affiliate WTSP that after feeding her five-year-old cat, Smokey, Friskies  for several days, the animal fell ill. When Herget took him to the vet, he was diagnosed with acute kidney failure and put to sleep.

Cause and effect?

Herget had switched to Friskies from a different cat food. Her vet was unable to determine whether the food had caused Smokey's illness, and the cat was so sick that he couldn't draw enough blood to run additional tests. A medical chart prepared by the vet said the only difference before and after the kidney failure was the cat's change in diet.

Friskies was the subject of a class-action lawsuit several years ago. While Herget says she was aware of the suit, she assumed that the litigation had spurred parent company Purina to fix any remaining problems with the food.

But Herget started looking around on the Internet and soon found accounts of similar experiences from other cat owners. Many of those accounts included a switch to Friskies followed by throwing up, hair loss, and, in some cases, death -- all symptoms that Herget says Smokey experienced.

Pet food woes

While the cause of Smokey's death is still unclear -- and probably will remain so -- it raises old questions about the safety of pet food in general. In March 2007, Menu Foods recalled 53 brands of dog food and 42 brands of cat food after tests showed  the foods caused kidney failure. Many of the brands were found to be infected with rodent poisoning, a revelation that then-CEO Paul Henderson was unable to explain.

A number of lawsuits concerning that recall, which were eventually consolidated in a New Jersey federal court, were settled in late 2008.

A separate lawsuit targeted Canidae, after a number of consumers said their pets became sick after eating that brand of food. Canidae dismissed a lab report from 2007 showing that the food contained acetaminophen, a type of painkiller.

Importance of due diligence

Herget's experience also highlights the need for thorough research before making the decision to switch your cat or dog food. Consumer websites like ConsumerAffairs.com have both good and bad reviews of many brands of pet food, and let you know which behaviors following a switch are normal and which ones are not.

None of this is much comfort to Herget, who told WTSP that she cries herself to sleep on a regular basis. WTSP said that for Herget, as for many pet owners, “pets are not just animals, they are part of the family.”

Woman Says Friskies Killed Her CatFinds similar accounts online...

Article Image

Feds Probe Reports of Dog Deaths, Illnesses From Pork Bone Treats


A Missouri pet products company is under investigation by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) amid reports that scores of dogs have became seriously ill or died after eating the manufacturers treats. The company at the heart of the probe is Dynamic Pet Products of Washington, Mo., an FDA spokesman told ConsumerAffairs.com today.

FDA is aware of the issue and is looking into it, according to a statement the spokesman sent us. We take very seriously any potential harm to pets from products regulated under the Federal Food Drug and Cosmetic Act and encourage consumers to report their concerns to the FDA. If warranted we will take appropriate action and notify the public.

ConsumerAffairs.com has received several complaints about one of the company's treats -- Real Ham Bones. Pet owners say the 8 hickory smoked pork femur bones -- sold as treats -- have splintered and caused their dogs to become violently ill or even die.

My dog ate the bone and died, said pet owner Christina N. of Collierville, Tennessee. The company denied my claim for vet bills. They said I chose to give my dog the bone. This was a very, very painful death for Buddy. Many dogs have died from this product. I had a necropsy done and still they claim it wasn't their product.

A Texas pet owner also blamed the death of her dog on the companys chew bones: I purchased the pet treat for my dog and it killed him, said Kriss L. of Richardson, Texas. Words cannot express my grief.

Not a dime

An Indiana pet owner told us her dog had to undergo surgery after chewing one of Dynamics Real Ham Bones. The dogs health problems, she said, surfaced ten minutes after it started chomping on the treat.

I noticed it had broken apart, so I took it away from her (and) a short time later she was gravely ill, trying to vomit but couldnt, said Patti S. She couldnt even drink water.

Patti rushed her dog to the vet. They took X-rays and said she had splinters of the bone in her intestines and she had to go through surgery. Thank God I have a great vet because she is the reason my dog is still alive.

Patti called Dynamic Pet Products about her dogs experience. The company referred her case to its insurance carrier, which denied Pattis claim.

They would not pay a dime, she said. They (said) they were not at fault. They said I was for not monitoring my dog closely enough.

A New Jersey pet owner also told us her dogs became sick after eating one of Dynamics chew bones: On March 2, I bought two Real Ham Bones for my two Bulldogs, said Nadine of Woodstown, New Jersey. That night, one Bulldog threw up 5 times.

Nadines vet ordered X-rays on the dog, but they did not reveal any blockage. The vet, however, blamed the chew bone for the dogs gastric problems, she said.

This is day three (and) she has not moved her bowels yet and (we) will have to have another trip to the vet.

What about Nadines other Bulldog? She is moving her bowels, but they are full of bone, she said.

Similar problems

Another pet owner told us her dog experienced similar problems after gnawing on one Dynamics chew bones.

I bought a Real Ham Bone made by Dynamic and a few hours later my dog was throwing up and yelping when he had a bowel movement, said Maureen G. of Gladstone, Missouri. I decided to Google the product and found out this has happened to a lot of pets.

This product needs to be taken off the shelf, she added. How many dogs have to die first? Luckily, my dog will be okay. I bought it for him thinking that it would be safe and unfortunately the product isn't.

ConsumerAffairs.com contacted Dynamic Pet Products today about the FDAs investigation and the complaints weve received about its chew bones. The company did not return our call.

Dynamics Web site states the Real Ham Bones are not recommended for aggressive chewers. As with all natural bones, we recommend supervision during eating, the Web site points out. The companys Web site also states that its proud of its track record and reputation.

Dynamic has not pulled any of its chew bones or treats off the market and pet owners are likely to still find them on store shelves.

The FDA said pet owners can report any health problems their dogs experience with Dynamic Pet Products chew bones or treats to the agencys Consumer Complaint Coordinator in their region.

Feds Probe Reports of Dog Deaths, Illnesses From Pork Bone Treats...

Salmonella Concerns Prompt Recall of Dog Treats


Fears of salmonella contamination have triggered a recall of nearly 75,000 dog treats by the The Hartz Mountain Corporation.

The New Jersey-based pet products company over the weekend voluntarily pulled one lot of its Hartz Naturals Real Beef Treats for Dogs off store shelves, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) said.

The recall is limited to the eight-ounce bags of the beef treats that have the lot code BZ0969101E and the UPC number of 32700-11519.

Hartz imported the treats from Brazilian supplier Bertin S.A. According to the FDA, Bertin tested the products before shipping them to the United States and did not detect any signs of the bacterium that can cause food poisoning.

Random sample testing by the FDA, however, uncovered the presence of salmonella in the dog treats, the federal agency said.

No ill effects

Hartz is "aggressively investigating the source of the problem," the FDA said. Although the company has not received any reports of illnesses -- in dogs or humans -- linked to the treats, it is pulling the products from all retail stores and distribution centers, the FDA said.

The agency warned that pet owners can become infected if they handle any salmonella-tainted products, especially if they don't wash their hands after touching them.

Salmonella cause serious infections in young children, frail or elderly people, and those with weakened immune systems, the FDA said. Symptoms of salmonella infections in dogs and humans include fever, diarrhea, bloody diarrhea, abdominal pain, and nausea. People or dogs experiencing those symptoms should immediately seek medical attention, the FDA said.

The agency also warned that infected -- but otherwise healthy -- pets can spread salmonella to other animals or people.

Dog owners who have any of the recalled treats should immediately throw them away, the FDA said. For more information about this action or how to obtain a refund, pet owners can contact Hartz at 1-800-275-1414.



Salmonella Concerns Prompt Recall of Dog Treats...

P&G Recalls Limited Number of Iams Cat Food Bags


Salmonella concerns have prompted Procter & Gamble to pull a limited number of bags of cat food off store shelves.

P&G Sunday recalled a small number of Iams Proactive Health Indoor Weight & Hairball Care dry cat food bags, which were recently sold in one or two Loveland, Colorado, stores.

The company said the cat food has the potential to be tainted with salmonella, a bacterium that can cause food poisoning. P&G, however, said it has not received any reports of illnesses linked to the pet food.

The recall is limited to Iams Proactive Health Indoor Weight & Hairball Care cat food sold in blue 6.8-pound bags, with a code date of 02304173 (B1-B6), and a UPC number of 1901403921.

P&G has worked with its retailers to remove the affected product from stores in the area, the company said. P&G believes that only three bags may have been purchased recently by consumers in the area. Yet, as a precautionary measure, the company is initiating this retrieval.

Pet owners who purchased the recalled cat food should discard it and contact P&G at 800-862-3332 for a replacement product.

Sundays action is the latest in a string of salmonella-related recalls the Cincinnati-based pet food maker has issued this summer.

In July, the company pulled two lots of its Iams Veterinary Formulas Feline Renal dry food off the market because of possible salmonella contamination. Less than two weeks later, the company expanded that recall to include some of its Iams and Eukanuba dry dog and cat food products.

P&G said it has not received any reports of illnesses linked to those recalled products, which were sold in veterinary clinics and specialty pet stores in the United States and Canada.

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA), however, warned pet owners they can become infected with salmonella if they handle any the recalled foods especially if they dont wash their hands after touching surfaces exposed to the products.

Symptoms of salmonella infections in healthy people include nausea, vomiting, diarrhea or bloody diarrhea, abdominal cramping and fever, the FDA said. In rare cases, salmonella can cause arterial infections, arthritis, muscle pain, and other serious health problems.

Pets with salmonella infections may have decreased appetite, fever and abdominal pain, the FDA said. If the infections are not treated, pets can become lethargic and have diarrhea or bloody diarrhea, fever and vomiting.

The FDA also warned that infected -- but otherwise healthy -- pets can spread salmonella to other animals or people.

Consumers with dogs or cats that ate the recalled food should contact their veterinarians if their pets experience any of these symptoms, the FDA said.

P&G Recalls Limited Number of Iams Cat Food Bags...

Article Image

Merrick Pet Care Recalls Texas Hold'Em Dog Treats

A Texas pet food company is again expanding its recall of beef-flavored dog treats because of continued concerns about salmonella contamination.

Merrick Pet Care, Inc. on Monday announced it's widening the companys July recall to include all lots of 10 ounce Beet Filet Squares and Texas HoldEms treats, saying the products have the potential to be tainted with the bacterium that causes food poisoning.

This is the third time in recent weeks the Amarillo-based company has issued a recall involving various lot numbers of the treats, which were shipped to distributors and retailers nationwide.

In July, Merrick pulled 86 cases of its beef filet squares off the market after a sample analyzed by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) tested positive for salmonella. Earlier this month, the company pulled another 83 cases of those treats -- and the Texas HoldEms treats -- off store shelves. On Monday, Merrick recalled all lots of the treats sold in 10 ounce plastic bags because of ongoing concerns about salmonella contamination.

The company, however, said it has not received any reports of illnesses linked to the recalled treats.

Salmonella poses a health risk to animals and people who handle products tainted with the bacterium, the FDA said.

Salmonella poses a health risk to animals and people who handle the products tainted with the bacterium, the FDA said.

People can become infected with salmonella if they do not thoroughly wash their hands after touching contaminated products or any surfaces exposed to them.

Symptoms of salmonella infections in people include nausea, vomiting, diarrhea or bloody diarrhea, abdominal cramping and fever, the FDA said. In rare cases, salmonella can cause arterial infections, arthritis, muscle pain, and other serious health problems. People who experience these symptoms after handling salmonella-tainted products should contact their physicians.

Pets with salmonella infections may become lethargic and have diarrhea or bloody diarrhea, fever, and vomiting, the FDA said. Some pets may only experience decreased appetites, fever, and abdominal pain.

Pet owners with dogs that experience any of these symptoms after eating the recalled treats should contact their veterinarians, the FDA said.

The agency also warned that infected but otherwise healthy pets can spread salmonella to animals and humans.

Consumers who purchased the recalled treats can return them to the store for a full refund, the company said. For more information about this action, contact Merrick at 1-800-664-7387.



Merrick Pet Care Recalls Texas Hold'Em Dog Treats...

Article Image

Pet Owner Finds Dead Frog in Canned Dog Food


An Illinois pet owner made what she calls a disgusting discovery when she recently opened a can of Pedigree dog food. Inside the can of chicken with gravy food Dianne T. says she found a dead frog.

It was the most disgusting thing, she told ConsumerAffairs.com. I almost hurled and I have a strong stomach.

Dianne says she often splits a can of wet food between her four dogs two Blue Merle Collies, an Old English Sheepdog, and her ailing moms Shih Tzu.

When I opened up this can on Thursday night I saw a brown clump in the food, the Frankfort, Illinois, pet owner says. I was like what is that? I flipped it over and it was a dead frog.

I walked over to the kitchen sink because I thought I was going to throw up, she adds. It was gross. I had to call my son and he said, Oh my God its a frog, its a frog.

Dianne called the company that makes the food, Mars Petcare US, to report the dead frog food.

And what got me mad is they offered me coupons for more dog food. I told them I dont want your coupons. Why would I want to give my dogs more of this food? I will never buy or feed Pedigree canned food again, Dianne adds. I wont even donate what I have left to a shelter.

The frog-tainted can was part of a case of Pedigree Choice Cuts in gravy food that Dianne purchased in early August from Sams Club. It has a best by date of 4/25/12 and the manufacturers number is 017c1kkcf.

Half the cans were chicken and half were beef, Dianne says. And my dogs have been eating other cans from this same case.

Dianne is now worried that her dogs -- or someone elses -- could become sick from any Pedigree food made at the same time as the can with the dead amphibian.

My big concern is whats going into this food, she says. Whats going into this food that people are feeding their pets? Obviously, its not chicken. Theres a frog in that food a whole dead frog. And if theres a frog in there, what else is in the food?

Dianne says she doesnt know what type of frog is in the food or if its poisonous.

Are there toxins in that frog? she asks. Everything I read about poisonous frogs said they keep their toxins in them after they after die. Does that mean the toxins were spread through Lord knows how many cans when the food was processed? What else could the frog have contaminated?

Mild symptoms

Dianne immediately contacted her veterinarian after she discovered the dead frog in her dogs food.

I asked him what could happen if the dogs ate from a can that contained a dead frog, she says. And he said they could have diarrhea, vomiting, and neurological problems.

In the past few days, Dianne says her healthy, active dogs have experienced some mild signs of those problems.

My dogs have had some loose bowels, says Dianne, who is now feeding them cooked rice and chicken. And my older collie suddenly turned up lame on Tuesday. She didnt want to get up and was holding up her back paw. My vet couldnt find anything wrong, but said to bring her back on Saturday. It may be a pinched nerve and she is getting better.

Mars customer service representative, however, told Dianne the dead frog did not pose any health risks to her dogs.

She said they cant get any diseases from this because the food is cooked in the can so its sterile. But what kind of quality control is going on when a dead frog is in the food? That frog had to be in the food when they prepared it.

ConsumerAffairs.com contacted Mars about the frog-tainted dog food and the company told us its investigating Diannes unlikely claim.

At Mars Petcare US, quality and food safety is our top priority, the company said in a statement ConsumerAffairs.com received Friday evening. While its highly improbable that this could occur, were taking it very seriously and launching a full-scale investigation into this consumers claim.

Mars added: We are sending a third-party to the consumers home today to collect the frog and deliver it directly to an independent lab for testing. Its important to note that canned pet food is cooked at high temperatures and processed on high speed equipment, making it very unlikely that a frog could become enclosed in a can.

Dianne told us on Saturday that no one with Mars or an independent lab came to her home on Friday to pick up the dead frog.

Asked about the companys doubts concerning her claim, Dianne said: We figured theyd say that, but theres a cooked frog in this can of food. Its legs are curled. I think theyre side-stepping this situation.

Dianne also has a message to anyone else who doesnt believe she found a dead frog in her dogs can of Pedigree food.

Why would I put a dead frog in my dogs food? asks Dianne, a self-proclaimed dog lover who volunteers for Collie Rescue of Greater Illinois, Inc. I treat my dogs like people. I dont eat that stuff and dont expect my animals or anyone elses animals to do that, either.

I also have no desire to sue Mars. Thats the last thing on my mind.

Dianne, however, does expect Mars to take two specific actions.

What I want Mars to do is clean up their facility, she says. Frogs belong outside. They belong in a pond not in my dogs food. I also expect Mars to take care of my vet bills if my dogs get sick, but only it pertains to the dead frog.

To protect other dogs from eating food that might contain dead frogs, Dianne also reported her incident with Pedigrees food to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration.

And theyve now opened a complaint about this, she says. I dont want anyone feeding their dogs something that is unhealthy.



Pet Owner Finds Dead Frog in Canned Dog Food...

P&G; Recalls Prescription Cat Food


Procter & Gamble (P&G) is recalling two specific lots of its prescription renal dry cat food as a precautionary measure. The company says it has the potential to be contaminated with salmonella.

The recalled product is identified as Iams Veterinary Formulas Feline Renal 5.5 lbs; lot code 01384174B4; UPC code 0 19014 21405 1.

This product is available by prescription through veterinary clinics throughout the U.S.

No illnesses have been reported. A Food and Drug Administration (FDA) analysis identified a positive result on the lot codes listed above. Lot codes can be found in the lower right corner on the back of the bag.

Consumers who have purchased dry cat food with this code should discard it.

People handling dry pet food can become infected with Salmonella, especially if they have not thoroughly washed their hands after having contact with surfaces exposed to this product.

Pets with Salmonella infections may have decreased appetite, fever and abdominal pain. If left untreated, pets may be lethargic and have diarrhea or bloody diarrhea, fever and vomiting.

Infected but otherwise healthy pets can be carriers and infect other animals or humans. If your pet has consumed the recalled product and has these symptoms, you should contact your veterinarian.



P&G Recalls Prescription Cat Food...

Feline's Pride Recalls Raw Cat Food

A New York company today recalled some of its raw food for cats and kittens because of possible salmonella contamination.

Felines Pride of Elma, New York, said its pulling its Natural Chicken Formula in 2.5 pound plastic containers off the market. The frozen raw food with ground bone for cats and kittens included in this action were made on June 10, 2010.

The company sold the products in uncoded plastic containers to private consumers nationwide. Felines Pride makes its food when consumers place their orders and its products have a shelf life of about one week. Only those orders placed and shipped from June 10 through June 17, 2010, are included in this recall.

Felines Pride and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) are investigating to find the source of this problem.

The company and the FDA said they have not received any reports of illnesses linked to the recalled food. But the FDA warned that people handling raw pet food can become infected with salmonella. The risks increase if pet owners have not thoroughly washed their hands after handling the food or touching any surfaces exposed to the products.

Symptoms of salmonella infections in people include nausea, vomiting, abdominal cramps, minimal diarrhea, fever, and headache. Children, the elderly, and those with compromised immune systems are more susceptible to these types of infections and may experience more severe symptoms, according to the FDA.

Anyone who experiences these symptoms after handling the recalled pet food should immediately contact their health care provider, the FDA said.

Pets with salmonella infections may be lethargic and have diarrhea or bloody diarrhea, fever, and vomiting, the FDA said. Some pets will only have decreased appetites, fever and abdominal pains.

The FDA warned that infected but otherwise healthy pets can still be carriers of salmonella and infect other animals or humans.

Pet owners with cats that have eaten this recalled food -- and display these symptoms -- should contact their veterinarians.

The FDA said pet owners should not feed the recalled products to their cats and advised consumers to immediately discard the food.

For more information about this action, pet owners can contact the company at (716) 580-3096.



Feline's Pride Recalls Raw Cat Food...

Article Image

Pro-Pet Dog Vitamins Recalled After Salmonella Scare

By Lisa Wade McCormick
ConsumerAffairs.com

June 23, 2010
A salmonella scare has prompted an Ohio company to recall some of its vitamins for dogs.

United Pet Group of Cincinnati is pulling all unexpired lots of its Pro-Pet Adult Daily vitamin supplement tablets for dogs because of the possible contamination.

The company took this action out of an abundance of caution after one lot of the product tested positive for salmonella, a bacterium that can cause food poisoning.

The recalled vitamins -- sold in retail stores nationwide -- come in 100-count white plastic bottles with a light blue label and have a UPC of 26851-01800. All bottles with expiration dates on or before 06/13 are included in this action.

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) said salmonella can affect pets and humans who handle products contaminated with the bacterium.

Pets with salmonella infections may become lethargic and have diarrhea or bloody diarrhea, fever, and vomiting, the FDA said. Some pets will only experience decreased appetite, fever and abdominal pain.

Infected -- but otherwise healthy pets -- can still spread the bacterium to other animals or humans, according to the FDA. Consumers with pets that consumed the recalled vitamins and have these symptoms should contact their veterinarians.

The FDA warned that people who handle dry pet food or treats tainted with salmonella can also become infected. The risk is greater for those who have not thoroughly washed their hands after having contact with the contaminated products or any surfaces exposed to them.

Symptoms of salmonella poisoning in humans include nausea, vomiting, diarrhea or bloody diarrhea, abdominal cramping, and fever. In rare cases, salmonella can cause arterial infections, arthritis, and other serious health problems, the FDA said. Anyone who experiences these symptoms after handling a salmonella-tainted pet product should contact their physician.

United Pet Group said consumers should immediately stop giving their dogs the recalled vitamins. For more information about this action, pet owners can contact the company at 1-800-645-5154, extension 3.



Pro-Pet Dog Vitamins Recalled After Salmonella Scare...

Article Image

Natural Balance Pulls Sweet Potato, Chicken Dry Dog Food

By Lisa Wade McCormick
ConsumerAffairs.com

June 21, 2010
Natural Balance has pulled some of its Sweet Potato & Chicken dry dog food off the market because of possible salmonella contamination.

The California company took the action after a random sample analyzed by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) tested positive for the bacterium that can cause food poisoning. That sample had a Best By date of June 17, 2011, the FDA said.

The only products involved in this recall are the Natural Balance Sweet Potato & Chicken dry dog food in 5-pound and 28-pound bags with the "Best By" date of June 17, 2011, the company said. The UPC on the 5 pound bag is 7-23633-9000-4 and the UPC on the 28-pound bag is 7-23633-99002-8.

Natural Balance said there are no reports of any illnesses linked to the recalled food, which was manufactured on December 17, 2009.

Upon hearing from the FDA, I immediately went to our Director of Customer Service, a licensed Registered Veterinary Technician, to check call logs for any complaints with this product, the companys president, Joey Herrick, wrote in a June 18, 2010, letter posted on Natural Balances Web site. Our Customer Service department closely tracks and monitors complaints for any potential issues; and I heard no reports in our weekly meetings, so I was not surprised when I found we did not have a single complaint about this product.

Herrick said he also hired an independent lab to test the companys retention sample from the recalled lot.

Those test results also came back negative, he said, including a link to the findings by Zoologix. I reported our test results and call logs to the FDA, but due to the positive result they had found, they recommended a recall.

The company distributed the recalled food in pet specialty stores in the following 26 states: Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Iowa, Kansas, Louisiana, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nevada, New Mexico, North Dakota, Oklahoma, Oregon, South Dakota, Texas, Utah, Washington, Wisconsin and Wyoming.

Herrick said his company has strict testing protocols and he was surprised by the FDAs findings.

"In my mind, I asked, How can this happen? I spent over $900,000 putting in our laboratory to test our products before we release them. We tested samples from the production run when it was manufactured six months ago, and the results came back negative.

He added: I believe that we are the only pet food company that has built an in-house lab as an added check and gives you the test results in real time on our website. We hold the finished product in our warehouses for two to three days, until that testing is completed. We only release product to be shipped when the testing is negative.

Not perfect

Nonetheless, Herrick conceded there is no perfect testing protocol.

But the alternative is not testing at all, he wrote. That wouldnt work for me. I wouldnt be able to sleep at night knowing we arent testing every product before it goes out, to help make sure our products are the best in the business. Any testing is much safer for you and your pets than the alternative, which is not testing at all.

The FDA said salmonella can affect pets and humans who handle products contaminated with the bacterium. Symptoms of salmonella poisoning in humans includes nausea, vomiting, diarrhea or bloody diarrhea, abdominal cramping, and fever. In rare cases, salmonella can cause arterial infections, arthritis, and other serious health problems, the FDA said. Anyone who experiences these symptoms after handling the recalled pet food should contact their physician.

Pets with salmonella infections can be lethargic and have diarrhea or bloody diarrhea, fever, and vomiting, the FDA said. Some pets may have decreased appetite, fever, and abdominal pain.

The FDA warned that infected -- but otherwise healthy pets -- can still spread the bacterium to other animals or humans. Pet owners with dogs that ate the recalled food and exhibit these symptoms should contact their veterinarians, the FDA said.

Natural Balance said pet owners can return any of the recalled food for a full refund. For more information, pet owners can contact Natural Balance at (800) 829-4493 or check the companys Web site.

Natural Balance Pulls Sweet Potato, Chicken Dry Dog Food...

Oklahoma Memorial Will Honor Pets Poisoned by Melamine


A grieving pet owner is creating a memorial to honor the thousands of dogs and cats that died or became seriously ill during the 2007 melamine-tainted pet food recall.

The Oklahoma woman and her husband, who lost six pets in the recall that nuked their lives, have donated five acres of land near Keystone Lake in Tulsa for the sanctuary theyve named Vindication.

The memorial is scheduled to open on June 12, 2010.

The animals that were lost or are still suffering need to be counted and acknowledged, says the woman, who wants to remain anonymous. I want people to feel like their animals did matter. This memorial is to honor the bond between animals and humans.

Creating the memorial is also the donors way of helping pet owners deal with heartbreaking loss of their beloved dogs and cats.

Such a loss can shatter someones life, she says. It devastated hers.

She and her husband lost two dogs and four cats because of melamine-tainted food.

By March 17, one day after Menu announced its recall, I had three dead animals and three who were dying slowly, the woman says. I have cleaned vomit and bloody urine and know what happens when pets die of catastrophic kidney failure. And I cant tell you how it hurts me to open my door and walk into an empty house.

But this (memorial) isnt about my loss, she adds. Its about the thousands and thousands of pet owners out who are being stabbed in the backs. There is no justice or mercy for them or their pets. And there are no safer pet foods out there. Im doing this as one grieving pet family to the rest of those out there. And I honestly feel this will help their hearts heal.

The donor plans to transform the five acres of Oklahomas ancient Cross Timbers -- covered with 500-year-old oak trees -- into a memorial garden that will feature cascading pathways lined with flowers, park benches, and handmade stones. Each stone will bear the name of a dog or cat that died or is still sick because of the contaminated pet food, the donor says.

I will make all the stones at no cost to pet owners, she told ConsumerAffairs.com. I expect I will be overwhelmed, but I felt compelled to do this for the pet people. Its time somebody did something right for them.

Remembered 16

At the memorials entrance, the donor plans to create what she calls the Remembered 16 Circle. Shes making 16 stones to represent each of the animals that died during Menu Foods feed tests more than a month before the company announced the 2007 recall, the largest in United States history.

I gave them each a name, the donor says. They deserve to be honored. We need to lay their ghosts to rest.

The memorial will be divided into two areas -- one to honor the pets that died during the recall and the other for the dogs and cats that continue to suffer from the effects of the melamine-laced food.

Were going to show the names of the dead and tell the truth about what it costs to feed poison, the donor says. The dead wont lie; they died because of the pet food.

The donor also wants to honor the thousands of pets whose bodies are ravaged from the tainted food and the families who still struggle financially to care for their ailing dogs and cats.

Why were there no provisions made for the pets that are still sick in the lawsuits (filed in the wake of the recall)? the donor asks. Do you know the cost people are still paying for kidney failure in their animals? Its a staggering expense. Were going to collect stories about the economic devastation caused by the recall. Its costing pet owners hundreds of thousands of dollars.

The donor is all too familiar with the exorbitant costs of caring for pets with melamine-related illnesses. She and her husband planned to build a house and retire on the five acres they donated for the Vindication memorial.

But we cant afford to do that, not after all our (veterinary) expenses, she says. I guess the universe had different plans for us.

She adds: When I told my husband what I wanted to do, he said, Fine, lets do it for all the pet owners. And then he bought me a chainsaw.

Sorrow and anger

Traces of sorrow and anger are still etched in the donors voice when she talks about the heartache her family endured because of the melamine-tainted pet food.

Were still grieving, she says. It was unbearable to watch my husband hold our babies (pets) as they died. And it happened again and again.

She's furious that the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) didnt do more to prevent this unbelievable nightmare.

The FDA can say all they want about how they didnt know what was going on, but theyre lying through their teeth, the donor says. The FDA has intentionally inflicted pain on us.they knew melamine was flooding into the country.

The cruelties have been done to pets and their owners, she adds. The last three years have been an unbelievable nightmare for them.

The donor, however, doesnt want to continue waging a verbal battle with the FDA and others involved in the recall. Shes chosen an unconventional war tactic to address her concerns and help grieving pet owners nationwide.

Im not talking anymore, she says. Im going to be gardening. Im an unusually gifted gardener and one determined person. And Ive found peace doing this for others.

The donors generosity has already given a grieving pet owner in Rhode Island a sense of peace.

This is a gift to all the pets who suffered, says Carol V., who lost two cats because of the tainted food. It shows how many pets suffered. It makes them count for something. It means theyre not forgotten.

Carols beloved cats will never be forgotten by her family or other pet owners who tour Vindication.

The donor has finished a memorial stone for one of Carols cats, a Calico named Smudge. The 13-year-old feline died in December 2008 of renal failure.

I cried like a baby when I saw Smudges stone, Carol told us. It made me feel like shes part of something bigger.

I think she (the donor) understands the depths of sadness pet owners have endured and had to do something. And it gives me a personal sense of peace that Smudge is now part of this memorial.

Pet advocate Susan Thixton, who runs www.TruthaboutPetFood.com, also applauds the donors action and generosity.

This gift has been given to us because the donors wanted all the innocent pets to be remembered, says Thixton, the spokesperson for the anonymous donor and her husband. They wanted no one to forget why these pets died or became ill, and they wanted pet owners to have something that can never be taken away.

The donors are leaving the five acres in a trust and have set aside money in their estate to maintain the property, Thixton says. They wanted this (memorial) to go to all pet owners.

The donors are not independently wealthy people. Thixton says. They are an average family that has been shattered by pet food. They recognized that we (pet owners) have been crushed time and time again. No laws have changed, no lawsuits have been settled, (and) none responsible have been jailed.

Now, thanks to this compassionate family, all these pets will be remembered; why they died will be remembered.

Pet owners whod like their deceased or ailing dogs or cats memorialized at Vindication can fill out a form on Thixtons Web site.

God bless these pet owners, the donor says. Everything thats been done to them in the past three years dishonors them. This (memorial) is to honor them and their petsI hope it makes them feel better.



Oklahoma Memorial Will Honor Pets Poisoned by Melamine...

Chemnutra Owners Sentenced for Melamine-Tainted Pet Food



A federal judge today sentenced two Nevada business owners to three years probation for distributing a melamine-tainted ingredient that triggered a massive pet food recall in 2007 and caused the deaths and illnesses of thousands of dog and cats nationwide.

U.S. Magistrate Judge John T. Maughmer also ordered Sally Qing Miller, 43, a Chinese national, and her husband, Stephen S. Miller, 57, to each pay a $5,000 fine. In addition, Whipple ordered the Miller's company, Chemnutra, Inc., to pay a $25,000 fine.

Today's sentencing ends a long legal case that centered on the involvement of the Millers and Chemnutra with importing and distributing the melamine-tainted wheat gluten used in the recalled pet food.

A Rhode Island pet owner whose cats died after eating some of the tainted food said today's sentence was too lenient, and justice was not served.

"I feel the sentence is not appropriate, said Carol V. of Rhode Island, whose beloved cats, Smudge and Jessica, died of renal failure. "They (the Millers) did not follow the rules and thousands suffered because of it -- financially and emotionally."

"There is no justice for Smudge, Jessica, or the others," she added. "This was no elbow knocking over a bad ingredient. Whether or not they knew someone in China adulterated the product does not matter to me. This company did not abide by the laws and rules of importing a food product. Laws and rules exist for a reason. When they are broken, there should be consequences."

But federal officials applaud the judge's sentence and their investigation and prosecution of the case.

"Today's sentence sends a strong message that we will work tirelessly to stop dangerous goods from entering the American marketplace," said John Morton, the Department of Homeland Security's assistant secretary for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). "ICE will continue to aggressively pursue individuals and organizations involved with illegally importing tainted or substandard goods that may jeopardize the safety of our families, communities and pets."

"We commend the action of the U.S. Attorney's Office against those companies and individuals responsible for many animal injuries and deaths from melamine contamination of pet food. The FDA will support strong enforcement of the law to protect the health and safety of our pets," said Dr. Joshua M. Sharfstein, principal deputy commissioner of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

Chemnutra is a Nevada-based company that buys food products in China and imports them into the United States. The company then sells those products to pet food makers and other manufacturers in the food industry. Sally Miller is Chemnutra's controlling owner and president, while Stephen Miller is an owner and the company's chief executive officer.

From November of 2006 through February 2007, Chemnutra and Millers imported more than 800 metric tons of melamine-tainted wheat gluten from China in at least 13 separate shipments, according to a federal indictment. Melamine is a chemical used to make plastic and fertilizers and is not allowed in human or pet food.

Chemnutra and the Millers received the melamine-tainted wheat gluten at a port of entry in Kansas City, Missouri, the indictment said. The company then sold and shipped the tainted wheat gluten to customers across the United States, who used the tainted product to make various brands of pet food.

A federal grand jury in 2008 indicted the Millers and Chemnutra for their roles in importing the tainted wheat gluten.

The Millers and their company later pleaded guilty to one count of selling adulterated food and one count of selling misbranded food.

"By pleading guilty, Chemnutra and the Millers admitted that melamine was substituted wholly or in part for the protein requirement of the wheat gluten so as to make it appear the wheat gluten was better or of greater value than it was," Beth Phillips, United States Attorney for the Western District of Missouri, said in a statement released today. "They also admitted that the labeling of the wheat gluten was false and misleading because the wheat gluten was represented to have a minimum protein level of 75 percent, when in fact it did not. The labeling was also false and misleading because melamine was not listed on the label as an ingredient."

During today's federal court hearing, Judge Maughmer decided not to impose further restitution because of the $24 million settlement reached in a civil suit filed in the wake of the pet food recall.

The melamine-tainted wheat gluten forced pet food makers to recall more than 150 brands of dog and cat food during 2007. It was the largest pet food recall in U.S. history.

Dogs and cats across the country suffered kidney failure after eating the contaminated food. While there is no coordinated national tracking system to monitor the number of pet deaths, the FDA said approximately 1,950 cats and 2,200 dogs died after eating pet food made with tainted wheat gluten imported from China.

Wheat gluten is a natural protein used as binding agent in pet food to thicken the gravy. Adding melamine to the wheat gluten made the product appear to have a higher protein level than it did, FDA officials said.

Back in Kansas City, Phillips said her office will continue to aggressively prosecute companies and individuals who put consumers at risk.

"We are committed to protecting the health and safety of the public," she said. "We will vigorously prosecute those who violate the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act and other federal statutes designed to protect the public from this kind of criminal conduct."

Assistant U.S. Attorneys Gene Porter and Joseph Marquez prosecuted the Chemnutra case. It was investigated by the FDA's Office of Criminal Investigation and U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement.

Chemnutra Owners Sentenced for Melamine-Tainted Pet Food...

FDA Warns Pet Owners of Salmonella in Beef Treats


The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) today warned pet owners not give their dogs Merrick Beef Filet Squares that have a best by day date of "111911" because the treats may be contaminated with salmonella.

The products included in this warning are packaged in 10-ounce green, red and tan re-sealable plastic bags. The Texas-based Merrick Pet Care, Inc., distributed the treats nationwide in retail stores and Internet sales.

The "best by" date is printed on the top portion of the bag, which is torn off when the package is opened. The FDA said consumers who cannot find the "best by" date should discontinue use the products.

Today's action comes after routine testing by the FDA in December 2009 detected salmonella in Merrick Beef Filet Squares. Salmonella is a bacterium that can cause food poisoning and other health problems.A follow-up inspection found deficiencies in the packaging and manufacturing processes, the FDA said.

Although there are no reports of illnesses linked to these treats, the FDA said consumers who have the products should not to handle or feed them to their pets.

Salmonella can affect both humans and animals, the FDA said. People who handle dry pet treats can become infected with salmonella, especially if they have not thoroughly washed their hands after touching the treats or any surfaces exposed to the products.

Salmonella can cause nausea, vomiting, diarrhea or bloody diarrhea, abdominal cramping and fever, the FDA said. In rare cases, the bacterium can cause more serious health problems, including arterial infections, inflammation of the lining of the heart, arthritis, muscle pain, eye irritation, and urinary tract symptoms.Consumers who develop any of these problems after handling these dog treats should immediately call their doctor, the FDA said.

Pets with salmonella infections may become lethargic and have diarrhea or bloody diarrhea, fever, and vomiting, the FDA said. Some pets may only have a decreased appetite, fever, and abdominal pain.

Infected but seemingly healthy pets can spread the salmonella bacterium to other animals or humans, the FDA warned.

Agency officials said pet owners with dogs ate the affected treats, or owners with pets experiencing any symptoms, should immediately contact their veterinarian.

Consumers can file complaints about these or other FDA-regulated pet food and treats with the the consumer complaint coordinator in their area. The FDA has more information about filing a pet food complaint on its Web site.

FDA Warns Pet Owners of Salmonella in Beef Treats...

FDA Warns of Salmonella Risk in Beef Hooves, Pig Ears

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) warns pet owners not to give their pets beef hooves or pig ears made by a California company because of possible salmonella contamination.

FDA officials late Thursday cautioned pet owners about the potentially-tainted products, made by Pet Carousel of Sanger, California, and distributed in bulk and retail packaging to stores nationwide.

Pet Carousel made the products under conditions that facilitate cross-contamination within batches or lots, the FDA said. No illnesses are linked to these products, but the FDA advised pet owners not to handle these items or give them to their pets.

FDA officials said this alert covers pig ear products with the brand names Doggie Delight and Pet Carousel and beef hooves that have the brand names Choo Hooves, Dentleys, Doggie Delight, and Pet Carousel. All sizes and lots of these products made by Pet Carousel are included in this warning.

FDA officials in September tested pig ears made by Pet Carousel and discovered the products contained salmonella.

Those findings prompted FDA officials to inspect Pet Carousels manufacturing facilities. During that inspection, the agency took additional pet treat samples and found salmonella present in beef hooves, pig ears, and in the manufacturing environment, the FDA said.

Dentley Beef Hoof

The agencys warning comes on the heels of a national recall issued by PetSmart of two Dentley Beef Hoof products because of possible salmonella contamination.

Those recalled products are:

• Dentley's Bulk Cattle Hoof UPC# 73725703323, use by date of 10/14/2012;

• Dentley's 10 Pack Beef Hooves UPC# 73725736055, use by date of 10/14/2012.

Pet Carousel shipped the recalled hooves from its California plant to three PetSmart distribution centers in Ottawa, Illinois, Groveport, Ohio, and Newnan, Georgia.

Some PetSmart stores -- not all -- received the recalled products. The national pet retailer, however, recalled all the items from all its U.S. stores as a precaution earlier this week. PetSmart also put a register block to prevent the sale of the recalled hooves in its stores, removed the items from the PetSmart.com Web site, and notified PetPerks customers who purchased the products.

Salmonella is a type of bacteria that can cause health problems in humans and animals, the FDA said. People handling dry pet food or pet treats can become infected with salmonella, especially if they do not thoroughly wash their hands after handling the products.

Healthy people infected with salmonella may experience nausea, vomiting, diarrhea or bloody diarrhea, abdominal cramping and fever. In some cases, salmonella can cause arterial infections, endocarditis (inflammation of the lining of the heart), arthritis, muscle pain, eye irritation, and urinary tract symptoms.

Pet owners who have any of those symptoms after handling these pet products should immediately contact their doctor.

Pets with salmonella infections may become lethargic and have diarrhea or bloody diarrhea, fever and vomiting, the FDA said. Some pets may only experience a decrease in their appetites, fever, and abdominal pain. Pets that have any of those symptoms should be seen by a veterinarian.

Easily spread

The FDA also warned that infected pets can spread the bacteria to other animals or humans.

Pet owners who purchased the recalled products should immediately discontinue use and return the hooves for a full refund.

More information about the recall is available on the companys Web site . Pet owners can also contact PetSmarts Customer Service at 1-888-839-9638.

In the meantime, the FDA said it will continue to investigate this matter to determine the source of the salmonella contamination.

Consumers with complaints about these or other FDA-regulated pet treats or food can call the FDA consumer complaint coordinator in their area.

FDA Warns of Salmonella Risk in Beef Hooves, Pig Ears...

Wysong Pet Food Pulls Products Due To Mold

By Lisa Wade McCormick
ConsumerAffairs.com

October 15, 2009
A third pet food company in as many weeks has pulled some of its products off the market.

Wysong Pet Food confirmed that it recalled five batches of Canine Diets Maintenance and Senior dry dog food -- manufactured in June and July 2009 -- because the products contain mold.

"Penicillium and fusarium mold species have been identified," Lucas Wysong, the company's vice-president, told ConsumerAffairs.com. "All mycotoxin tests conducted thus far are negative with regard to the recalled products."

"That we released some product that was not of the highest quality and may have caused any animals harm makes us frankly ashamed and heartsick," he added.

Specifically, the Michigan-based pet food maker recalled the following batches of dry dog food:

• Wysong Maintenance: lot #: 090617

• Wysong Maintenance: lot #: 090624

• Wysong Maintenance: lot #: 090706

• Wysong Maintenance: lot #: 090720

• Wysong Senior: lot #: 090623

ConsumerAffairs.com talked to a pet owner in Hawaii who says her Doberman Pinscher recently died -- and her eight other dogs became sick -- after eating Wysong's moldy food.

Lucas Wysong said his family's company is working closely with that pet owner. He called the case "exceptional" and said his company has received only two other minor complaints -- reports of diarrhea -- linked to the recalled food.

Wysong told us his company discovered the problem in late September after it investigated customer complaints' of possible mold contamination in the food.

In a prepared statement, Wysong said "At first report of potential mold in our products, Wysong launched an internal investigation. Batch records were re-examined, numerous bags of product opened and scrutinized, product samples were acquired from customers, and testing in-house and out-of-house conducted."

That investigation, the company said, revealed the problem with the food stemmed from the "unusually high heat and humidity" on the days the products were made in June and July. The company also blamed the higher moisture issues on a "malfunctioning moisture checking device."

Wysong said his company notified its distributors about the problem on September 29, 2009.

"Once Wysong ascertained that there was mold presence and the potential for mold (based on moisture tests) in certain batches we alerted our distributors, who were the primary recipients of these batches of product," he said. "Distributors were instructed to dispose of the product, as well as pull product from stores that had already received the product."

The company also said it contacted stores that received the recalled product and asked them to remove the food from store shelves. In addition, the company destroyed any "problematic" batches that remained in-house.

Wysong also told us that his company notified the Food and Drug Administration (FDA)about the mold problem. The FDA's new Reportable Food Registry requires U.S. companies to file a report when there is a "reasonable probability" that their food will cause serious health consequences to people or animals.

Wysong also posted a recall notice on its Web site, but that warning is buried under the dry dog food section.

When asked why his company didn't immediately notify pet owners about the mold problem, Wysong said "The vast majority of the recalled product was sent to our distributors and retailers. We have therefore focused our efforts on alerting distributors and stores and asked them to dispose of the product."

"In other words, we are focusing on the supply chain because the customers at the retail/store level are not identifiable," he said.

Wysong admitted that posting a notice on the company's Web site is not the most effective way to reach customers who may have the recalled products.

"The actual recipients of the product -- distributors and retailers -- have already been alerted, and those that buy our product in stores are likely not Wysong.net site visitors," he said. "The notice on the site therefore serves as an alert to those who did not receive these products."

"We keep records of the distributors and stores that were shipped this product," he added. "Our best chance at notifying customers is through these mediums."

Pet owners who have any of the recalled food should immediately stop feeding it to their dogs, Wysong said.

"She did not deserve to die that way"

That warning, however, came too late for Julie P. of Hawaii. She says her healthy Doberman Pinscher, Scarlet, died on September 26, 2009, after eating some of Wysong's moldy food.

"Losing Scarlet was just horrible and totally needless," Julie told us. "She died a very painful and agonizing death on the morning of her fifth birthday after suffering all night long. She had gone completely toxic."

But Julie's nightmare didn't end with Scarlet's death. Her other eight Dobermans also became seriously ill after eating Wysong's moldy food.

"They're lethargic and continued to get more and more down as time went by," says Julie, who switched her dogs to Wysong in August. "They have very red eyes with yellow gunk that they have had the whole time I was feeding Wysong. That has now finally gone away because I took them off the food after Scarlet died," she said.

"They also had severe diarrhea the whole time, too. At first I thought it was from the changing of their food, but it got worse with some bloody stools and did not go away until again I stopped feeding them Wysong."

One of Julie's dogs, a male named Doug, also developed a sore on his leg that would not heal and had "dry flaky skin with red bumps on his neck."

"Several of my other dogs, including my Daddy, Ruby, and Maybelle all have a bad rash on their groin areas that I also could not get to go away for the last two months," Julie says. "They have had gaseous upset stomachs many times in the last two months. They have been throwing up, and at times, Doug refused to even get near his feeding dish."

Julie says she didn't make a connection between Wysong's food and her dogs' death and illnesses until she opened a new bag on October 4, 2009.

"When I opened that bag, I noticed a moldy look to the kibble -- a look I had seen on several previous bags in the two months I feed it to my dogs. I did not notice any smell, but I think my dog Doug did."

Julie contacted the company that same day. "I was afraid to feed them what looked to me like moldy food," she says. "And I started putting all these symptoms together as being from the food."

"I'm not sure how I can prove that all of these symptoms were from eating the bad dog food," she adds. "But now that I've stopped feeding the food to them, they are all getting better, which seems to prove that it was."

Julie says Wysong should give her some compensation -- at least enough to cover her vet bills -- but no amount of money can ever replace Scarlet.

"She did not deserve to die that way," Julie says. "She was still a young and vibrant dog and very, very special to us. She could have gone on to live another ten years...it's hard to put a price tag on that. What would you pay to have your loved one with you for all those days?"

Lucas Wysong told us his company is "immensely sorry" for any worry or inconvenience this issue has caused its customers.

In Julie's case, Wysong said his company is in "direct communication" with her regarding the death of Scarlet and the illnesses of her other dogs.

"We have requested specific tests be conducted in an attempt to definitively determined the cause of death/sickness," he said, adding the company has not received any other reports of serious adverse reactions linked to the recalled food.

The company, he added, has also taken steps to ensure a mold problem like this doesn't surface again.

"We are in the midst of scrutinizing each and every step of our quality assurance processes," he said. "All products going back for months are being tested for moisture and mold, thus eliminating the possibility of further problematic product (if any exists) being released.

"We vow to all interested parties to do everything we can to ensure that this never happens again."

Julie, however, isn't taking any more chances with Wysong's food.

"Like a lot of people I am going to be making my own food for my dogs. But with this many to feed, that's a challenge. It can be hard to get all the vitamins in there, so I would like to supplement with a small amount of kibble."

Meanwhile, pet owners who have any of Wysong's recalled food -- or questions about the recall -- can e-mail the company at Wysong@Wysong.net.

Third in a series

Wysong is the third pet food maker in recent weeks to quietly pull some of its products off the market.

Earlier this month, Diamond Pet Foods removed some of its Premium Edge Finicky Adult and Hairball cat food off the market because of deficiencies in the thiamine levels.

Diamond's action came just days after Nutro Products quietly pulled from the market three types of its puppy food because of a production error.

The company said it voluntarily withdrew the puppy food after it had discovered pieces of melted plastic in the "production line of select varieties of NUTRO dry dog and cat food products."

Wysong Pet Food Pulls Products Due To Mold...

Diamond Pulls Premium Edge Cat Food from Shelves

Another pet food company has quietly withdrawn some of its products from store shelves.

Deficiencies in the thiamine levels of certain bags of Premium Edge Finicky Adult and Premium Edge Hairball cat food have prompted Diamond Pet Foods to pull the products from distribution.

The company made that announcement Premium Edges Web site.

The action comes just days after Nutro Products quietly removed from the market three types of its puppy food because of a production error.

Nutro confirmed its decision to voluntarily withdrawal the puppy food on its Web site last Wednesday, saying it had discovered pieces of melted plastic in the production line of select varieties of NUTRO dry dog and cat food products.

In this latest product withdrawal, Diamond said it is pulling from the market Premium Edge Finicky Adult and Hairball cat foods that have the following date codes: RAF0501A22X 18lb., RAF0501A2X 6 lb., RAH0501A22X 18 lb., RAH0501A2X 6lb.

Product testing proved no contaminants were discovered in the cat food; however the cat foods were deficient in thiamine, the company wrote on its Web site. Diamond tracked the vitamin premix lot number that was utilized in these particular cat foods and have performed testing on another lot of Premium Edge cat food that used the same vitamin premix, and it was not deficient in thiamine.

Symptoms of thiamine deficiency will be neurological in nature, according to the company. Any cats fed these date codes that display these symptoms should be immediately taken to a veterinarian, the company said, adding it has received calls about these health issues from pet owners or veterinarians primarily in the Rochester, New York, area.

The company said it asked all stores that received the cat food to pull the products off the shelves. The retailers were also asked to contact their customers via email or telephone requesting them to check the date code of the food, the company said.

Pet owners who have any of the Premium Edge cat foods involved in this action should return the products to the store, the company said.

For more information, contact Premium Edge at 1-800-977-8797.

The Nutro puppy food items quietly pulled off the market last week are:

• NUTRO ULTRA Puppy food for dogs, 4.5 pound bag, best buy date of 9/10/10, and a UPC of 79105 51313;

• NUTRO NATURAL CHOICE Chicken Meal, Rice and Oatmeal Formula Small Bites Puppy, 5 pound bag, best buy date of 9/10/10 and a UPC 79105 23050

Nutro said it shipped those bags of puppy food to PetSmart stores in California, Arizona, Colorado, Texas and New Mexico.

The pet food maker also pulled select 30 pound bags of NUTRO ULTRA puppy food, which were distributed to PETCO stores in California, Nevada, Hawaii, and Utah. Those bags of food have a best buy date of 9/10/10 and a UPC of 79105 51315.

A Nutro representative told ConsumerAffairs.com last week that the company pulled the puppy food off the market after learning a workers plastic hard hat was sucked into the machinery.

Based on our extensive review, it is highly unlikely that any pieces of plastic made it into finished product, the company wrote on its Web site. However, upon learning of the incident, we voluntarily retrieved all potentially affected products.

Although Nutro said it found pieces of melted plastic in the production line for dry dog and cat food products, the company is not pulling any feline food off the market.

Customers who have any puppy food involved in this action can return the product to the store for a full refund or exchange, Nutro said.

For more information, pet owners can contact Nutro 1-800-833-5330.

Diamond Pulls Premium Edge Cat Food from Shelves...

NUTRO Pulls Some Puppy Food from Shelves - Nutro Products Issues Update


Nutro Products has provided updated information on its decision to pull some of its puppy food off the market because of a production error.

The company late Wednesday posted information about the action on its Web site, which confirmed it's removing three types of puppy food off store shelves after discovering pieces of melted plastic in the production line of select varieties of NUTRO dry dog and cat food products.

We identified the source as a workers bump cap, similar to a hard hat, which inadvertently made its way into our manufacturing process, the company wrote. We immediately retrieved the affected pet food from our distributors, and only three skus reached retail stores."

The company added: Based on our extensive review, it is highly unlikely that any pieces of plastic made it into finished product. However, upon learning of the incident, we voluntarily retrieved all potentially affected products.

A Nutro customer service representative on Wednesday told ConsumerAffairs.com that a workers plastic hard hat was sucked into some of the machinery and the bags of puppy food may have plastic in them.

The representative also said the puppy food involved in this voluntary product withdrawal was only shipped to PETCO and PetSmart stores in Arizona and California.

But Nutros Web site now states the food was distributed to six other states.

The Web site also lists different UPC codes on some of the puppy foods than the ones Nutros representative gave ConsumerAffairs.com on Wednesday morning.

According to NUTROs Web site, the company is pulling the following flavors of puppy food -- shipped to PetSmart stores in California, Arizona, Colorado, Texas and New Mexico -- off store shelves:

• NUTRO ULTRA Puppy food for dogs, 4.5 pound bag, best buy date of 9/10/10, and a UPC of 79105 51313;

• NUTRO NATURAL CHOICE Chicken Meal, Rice and Oatmeal Formula Small Bites Puppy, 5 pound bag, best buy date of 9/10/10 and a UPC 79105 23050

Nutro also said it is pulling select 30-pound bags of NUTRO ULTRA puppy food, which were distributed to PETCO stores in California, Nevada, Hawaii, and Utah. Those bags of food have a best buy date of 9/10/10 and a UPC of 79105 51315.

Although Nutro said it found pieces of melted plastic in the production line for dry dog and cat food products, the company is not pulling any feline food off the market.

Customers who have any puppy food involved in this action can return the product to the store for a full refund or exchange, Nutro said.

For more information, pet owners can contact Nutro 1-800-833-5330.

Read more ...

• Verbatim complaints and comments from consumers.
• Recall notice

NUTRO Pulls Some Puppy Food from Shelves - Nutro Products Issues Update...

NUTRO Pulls Some Puppy Food from Shelves

Nutro Products is pulling some of its puppy food off store shelves because of a production error, ConsumerAffairs.com has learned.

A Nutro customer representative said the company is taking this action because a workers plastic hard hat was sucked into some machinery on Monday and the bags of puppy food may have plastic in them.

Nutros representative said the puppy food involved in this action -- distributed to PETCO and PetSmart stores in California and Arizona -- are:

• The 5 pound bags of Nutro Natural Choice Small Bites (Chicken Meal, Rice, and Oatmeal formula) puppy food with a best buy date of 9/10/10 and a UPC of 079105230506;

• The 4.5 pound bags of Nutro Ultra puppy food with a best buy date of 9/10/10 and a UPC of 079105513135;

• The 30 pound bags of Nutro Ultra puppy food with a best buy date of 9/10/10 and a UPC of 079105513159

Nutros representative said there are no problems with the puppy food. The company, she said, is removing the puppy food from store shelves as a precaution.

ConsumerAffairs.com contacted Nutros public relations office this morning, but did not receive an immediate reply. We also checked the companys Web site earlier today, but did not find any mention of this action.

A customer service representative with PetSmart, however, told us that Nutro had issued a voluntary product withdrawal of the puppy food. The representative listed the same flavors of puppy food, but did not have the UPC codes or the best buy dates. PetSmarts representative also said the company has not received any reports of illnesses or injuries linked to the puppy food involved in this action.

Customers with any of the puppy food involved in this action should not feed it to their pets, according to PetSmarts representative. Pet owners can return the puppy food to the store for a full refund or exchange.

Read more ...

• Verbatim complaints and comments from consumers.
• Recall notice

NUTRO Pulls Some Puppy Food from Shelves...

Nevada Couple Pleads Guilty to Distributing Melamine-Tainted Gluten

By Lisa Wade McCormick
ConsumerAffairs.com

June 16, 2009

A Nevada couple pled guilty in federal court today to distributing melamine-tainted wheat gluten, the ingredient blamed for the illnesses of deaths of thousands dogs and cats nationwide during the massive 2007 pet food recall.

Sally Qing Miller, 43, a Chinese national, and her husband, Stephen S. Miller, 56 — along with their company, Chemnutra, Inc., — entered their guilty pleas late this afternoon before U.S. Magistrate Judge John Maughmer.

Sally Miller is the controlling owner and president of Chemnutra; Stephen Miller is an owner and chief executive officer of Chemnutra.

Each of the co-defendants pleaded guilty to one count of selling adulterated food and one count of selling misbranded food.

"Millions of pet owners were impacted by the pet food recall in 2007," said Matt J. Whitworth, acting United States Attorney for the Western District of Missouri. "The conduct of these defendants in violating federal health and safety standards caused the deaths and illness of thousands of family pets, as well as anxiety among dog and cat owners across the country and economic harm to many pet food manufacturers."

By entering their guilty pleas, the Millers and Chemnutra admitted:

The chemical melamine — used to make plastic — was added to the wheat gluten to make it appear that the product had a higher protein content;

The wheat gluten's labeling was false and misleading because it represented the product had a minimum protein level of 75 percent — when it did not — and melamine was not listed on the label as an ingredient.

Under federal statutes, the Millers can face up to two years in federal prison without parole, plus a fine of up to $200,000, and an order of restitution. Chemnutra is subject to a fine of up to $400,000 and an order of restitution.

The Las Vegas, Nevada, business buys food and food components in China and imports those products into the United States. The company then sells those products to businesses in the food industry, including pet food manufacturers.

According to the U.S. Attorney's Office, Chemnutra and the Millers imported more than 800 metric tons of tainted wheat gluten from China — in at least 13 separate shipments — between November, 6, 2006, and February, 21, 2007. Federal authorities said those shipments — which totaled nearly $850,000 — were tainted with melamine.

Chemnutra and the Millers received the melamine-tainted wheat gluten at a port of entry in Kansas City, Missouri, and then sold and shipped the product to customers across the United States. Pet food makers then used the tainted product in various brands of food.

Role in pet food recall

During 2007, pet food manufacturers recalled more than 150 brands of dog and cat food that contained the tainted wheat gluten. Dogs and cats across the country that ate tainted pet food suffered kidney problems or died.

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) estimated approximately 1,950 cats and 2,200 dogs died after eating the melamine-tainted pet food.

ConsumerAffairs.com heard from thousands of dog and cat owners nationwide and in Canada who said their pets became sick or died after eating the contaminated pet food.

Pet food manufacturers use wheat gluten as a binding agent in certain types of food as a thickening agent for gravy.

The Millers and Chemnutra will be sentenced after the United States Probation Office finishes its presentence investigations.

Authorities said the conduct charged against the Millers in the remaining counts included in their 2008 federal indictment could be considered by the court and used against them at the time of sentencing.

Assistant U.S. Attorneys Gene Porter and Joseph Marquez prosecuted the case, which was investigated by FDAs Office of Criminal Investigation and U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement.

The newly-appointed FDA Commissioner applauded the investigative team and their results.

"The FDA's Office of Criminal Investigations acted aggressively in 2007 to investigate Chemnutra," said Dr. Margaret A. Hamburg. "Today's announcement reflects our continued commitment to investigate and prosecute companies and individuals that violate the law and endanger the publics health through illegal conduct."

Nevada Couple Pleads Guilty to Distributing Melamine-Tainted Gluten...

Pet Owners Unsurprised by FDA Shutdown of Evanger


Pet owners who were informed of the Food & Drug Administration's (FDA) suspension of Evanger's ability to sell pet food across state lines were relieved — and unsurprised — by the news.

News of the FDA's crackdown confirmed dog owner Leslie K.'s suspicions about Evanger's food — and federal authorities' interest in the company.

"A special agent with the FDA's Office of Criminal Investigations (OCI) called me in May 2009 and wanted details of what happened to my dogs after they ate Evanger's food," the Tabernacle, New Jersey, woman told us. "He came out and said Evanger's failed multiple inspections, and this was not a simple paperwork issue or something to do with an unimportant process. He said it was about ingredients and the manufacturing process and people are not getting what they pay for."

The FDA announced late Friday that it had suspended Evanger's temporary Emergency Permit — a decision that, for now, prevents the company from shipping products in interstate commerce. The agency said it took this action as a safety precaution.

"Evanger's, operating in Wheeling, Illinois, deviated from the prescribed process, equipment, product shipment, and recordkeeping requirements in the production of the company's thermally processed low acid canned food (LACF) products," the FDA said. "The deviations in their processes and documentation could result in under-processed pet foods, which can allow the survival and growth of Clostridium botulinum (C. botulinum), a bacterium that causes botulism in some animals as well as in humans."

Evanger's downplays the FDA's enforcement measures, suggesting the problems are simply a paperwork mix-up.

"In August of 2008, while updating required process information to the FDA our 'process authority' (processing expert) inadvertently deleted pertinent filings," Joel Sher, the company's vice-president, says in a statement on the pet food maker's Web site. "Evanger's has been working with the FDA to resolve this issue quickly. This situation does not call into question the safety of any Evanger's products. No Evanger's product are involved in any recall, nor is there any indication that any Evanger's product is unsafe."

"Just a paperwork problem"

Leslie's concerns with Evanger's food surfaced in May 2007 when three of her healthy dogs — a Chihuahua, Beagle, and Elkhound mix — suddenly became sick after eating the company's Pheasant and Brown Rice dry pet food.

Two other dogs — one belonging to a friend, another to a neighbor — also became ill after eating that same food. All the dogs experienced vomiting, diarrhea, dehydration, and urinary tract problems.

"We bought the food during the pet food recall when we were trying to find a safe food," Leslie recalls. "We opened one large bag and two small bags and started to add it to the dogs' regular food. But they all started having trouble. I spoke to someone who said to stop the food. Four of the dogs then got better."

But Leslie's Chihuahua, Remy, continued to deteriorate.

"He was urinating constantly, vomiting bile, his eyes were sunken from dehydration, and he had horrible lethargy," she said. "He wouldn't get up and do anything. This is a Chihuahua who loved to play. One of my neighbor's came over and said it looked liked Remy had aged ten years."

Blood tests run by Leslie's veterinarian revealed problems with Remy's urine and liver counts. Leslie contacted Evanger's about the dogs' illnesses, but said the company didn't seem concerned.

"The owner said he'd check into this and get back to me. I waited a few days and Joel (Sher, the company's vice-president) called me back. He said the company hadn't found any problems with the food. I asked him if he wanted to test my food, but he said 'No, we keep a sample of every batch so we can test it.'"

"After that call, all I got were answering machines and the secretary."

Leslie then worked with The Pet Food Products Safety Alliance (PFPSA) and had her Evanger's food tested.

Those tests, she says, revealed the copper levels in the food were 2.5 times the amount recommended by the Association of American Feed Control Officials (AAFCO).

When Leslie contacted Evanger's again, "At first, the office manager was nice, but as soon as she knew it was me on the line she became hostile and rude," she said. "She basically said they (Evanger's) were aware of the copper problem and were not concerned. She said they had not tested my food and no intention of doing so because they didn't get that many complaints."

"She knew she went too far because she later sent an e-mail that said the total opposite of what she told me in our conversation."

But could those elevated copper levels cause the dogs' illnesses?

"All my vet can say is the elevated levels (of copper) are consistent with the problems in the dogs: vomiting, diarrhea, lethargy, elevated liver enzymes, and urinary tract problems," Leslie said. "My vet feels it is the food, but says there is no way to prove that."

When asked about Evanger's comment that the FDA's latest action "does not call into question the safety" of any of its products, Leslie told us: "Obviously it does affect the safety of the food because how can the food be safe if the canning isn't done correctly.

"That comment makes me angry," she adds. "He (Joel Sher) tries to refute the FDA orders and notices in legalese. He words it carefully to make it sound like the FDA is wrong. He's trying to make it sound like this is just a paperwork problem. I hope people don't believe it."

"Should be criminally prosecuted"

Deborah V., of Monrovia, Maryland, agrees with Leslie. "People such as the Shers should be criminally prosecuted and put out of business," she said.

"Mr. Sher's callous attitude from day one has been shocking, and yet, here comes our vindication — a little late," she said. "Some people lost their pets to these awful people's food."

"I'm glad this (FDA action) finally happened. I feel relieved that, hopefully, no one else will go through what I have gone through with my dogs."

In Deborah's case, her two healthy 10-pound Pomeranians became gravely ill in November 2008 after sharing a can Evanger's beef chunks.

"Within half an hour, I was rushing to the vet," she recalls. "My dogs were unable to stand, hold up their heads, and they were blind. The vet stabilized them enough to allow me to then drive to the emergency animal clinic, where they were hooked to IVs, and my little guy even had his stomach pumped. He now has seizures, which started in the hospital. He is on a wide variety of meds...and now has a collapsed trachea and [has to use] an endotracheal tube."

Deborah repeatedly contacted Evanger's about her dogs' illnesses, but says the company ignored her concerns. Her roommate finally reached the company's vice-president, Joel Sher.

"And his comment, when told our dogs got sick from their food, was 'Oh, please'. He and his wife are all over the Internet, as well as an employee of theirs, posting information to have you believe they are a very concerned firm. Why not just be upfront? People deserve to know the truth, and I am talking about all of the issues people have had with their food, not just the horror we've gone through and are still going through."

Deborah says her female Pomeranian has improved, "but the little guy will never be 100 percent."

The FDA's latest action against Evanger's is the third in an ongoing series of enforcement proceedings against the pet food maker.

In April 2008, the FDA issued an "Order of Need for Emergency Permit" against Evanger's. That action came after the FDA determined the company had "failed to meet the regulatory requirements to process a product that does not present a health risk."

Two months later the FDA issued a temporary Emergency Permit against Evanger's.

FDA officials said they took that action after inspections of the company between March 2009 and April 2009 determined "Evanger's was not operating in compliance with the mandatory requirements and conditions of the Temporary Emergency Permit."

When the FDA announced its latest enforcement against Evanger's, the agency's Dr. Bernette Dunham said: "The FDA is stopping Evanger's ability to ship pet food in interstate commerce. Today's enforcement action sends a strong message to manufacturers of pet food that we will take whatever action necessary to keep unsafe products from reaching consumers."

Before Evanger's can resume shipping products, the FDA said, it must prove that corrective actions and processing procedures have been made to ensure the company's finished product will not present a health hazard.

Botulism is a toxin that affects the nervous system and can be fatal, the FDA said. Symptoms of botulism in dogs and cat include progressive muscle paralysis, disturbed vision, trouble chewing and swallowing, and progressive weakness to the body. Death is usually caused by paralysis of the heart or the muscles used in breathing.

NUTRO investigated?

Meanwhile, pet owners like Leslie are convinced that Evanger's isn't the only pet food maker on the FDA's radar.

"They have to be investigating NUTRO," she told us. "When I spoke with the FDA's agent from Office of Criminal Investigations, I mentioned NUTRO and he said he was very aware of the problems. But he said 'I'm not working on that case.' He caught himself and said that (investigation) could be in the process. Every time I talked to him, he struggled to find a way to say he was not working on that case, but it seemed to me that he was deliberately trying to give me the impression that there was an investigation of NUTRO.

She adds: "Why else would FDA agents not want to talk about it or the agency wouldn't release the NUTRO records [ConsumerAffairs.Com] requested under the Freedom of Information Act?"

Leslie pointed out that the health problems her dogs suffered after eating Evanger's food with elevated levels of copper — vomiting, diarrhea, lethargy, and elevated liver enzymes — sounded eerily familiar to the ones pets eating NUTRO have experienced.

"I'm seriously thinking that this is what's going on...that this could all be something a simple as the vitamins and minerals off," she says. "That can cause acute illnesses."

Just last month, NUTRO recalled seven flavors of its dry Natural Choice Complete Care and NUTRO Max cat food, saying the products contained incorrect levels of zinc and potassium.

The company blamed the problem on a production error by its U.S. premix supplier, Trouw Nutrition. One of the premixes, NUTRO said, contained excessive levels of zinc and not enough potassium. A second premix did not contain enough potassium.

NUTRO claims it has not received any complaints about the recalled food, but warned cat owners to monitor their pets for such symptoms as vomiting, diarrhea, a reduction in appetite or refusal of food, and weight loss.

ConsumerAffairs.com, however, continues to hear from cat owners who say their felines became ill — with those same types of symptoms — after eating NUTRO's recalled food. Some even suspects their cats' deaths are linked to the recalled food, and two contacted NUTRO regarding their sick pets.

Tests run last August by the PFPSA revealed samples NUTRO's Natural Choice Chicken Meal, Rice, and Oatmeal formula and Nutro Puppy Max contained levels of zinc and copper that the PFPSA said exceeded the recommendations of the AAFCO.

PFPSA's founder Don Earl says NUTRO's cat food recall — trigged by "incorrect levels of zinc and potassium" — gives credence to his organization's test results.

"I feel a certain amount of vindication as a result, particularly as the symptoms are identical to those reported by legions of dog owners," he told us.

ConsumerAffairs.com has received nearly 900 complaints from pet owners nationwide who say their healthy dogs and cats suddenly became sick after eating various flavors of NUTRO's pet food. The pets all have similar symptoms — vomiting, diarrhea, and other digestive problems. And in nearly every case, the dogs and cat became better after their owners stopped feeding them NUTRO.

NUTRO maintains its food is 100 percent safe and meets all federal guidelines. But Leslie says those are nothing but empty words and promises.

"The fact they keep saying nothing is wrong with their food and they are testing tells me that something is wrong. If they were testing the food, it wouldn't take an audit to find the problem. If they were testing the food, they would know that something is wrong."

The active poster on many pet-related message boards adds: "I'm not in this to get any money. That's not my point. My point is that whether you're buying Evanger's or NUTRO or a store brand of pet food, you should be able to buy a product that is safe and doesn't make your pets sick."

Pet Owners Unsurprised by FDA Shutdown of Evanger...

Consumers React to NUTRO Recalls; Zinc, Copper Levels Cited


Its about time. Thats how pet owners nationwide reacted to NUTRO Products' decision last Thursday to recall two varieties of its dry cat food.

NUTRO pulled seven flavors -- in 28 different bag sizes -- of its dry Natural Choice Complete Care and NUTRO Max cat food off store shelves, saying the products had incorrect levels of zinc and potassium. The company blamed the problem on a production error by its U.S. premix supplier, Trouw Nutrition.

NUTRO said it discovered the error on May 18 during an audit of documentation from that Illinois-based supplier. The company, however, waited another three days -- until May 21 -- to recall the products. Some pet owners wonder why it took so long for NUTRO to pull the cat food, but are grateful the company finally took some action.

I was relieved, but not very surprised, says Kristin K. of Trenton, N.J., whose kitten started vomiting bile and experiencing uncontrollable diarrhea after eating NUTRO Natural Choice. I figured with all the complaints Ive seen on your Web site about these (health) problems, they werent coincidence and eventually NUTRO would do something. But I definitely think that NUTRO needs to take a hard look at all its food -- not just its cat foods.

NUTRO claims it hasnt received any reports of illnesses linked to the recalled products -- distributed in the United States and ten other countries -- but warned pet owners to monitor their cats for vomiting, diarrhea, reduction in appetite, refusal to eat food, or weight loss.

That claim outraged pet owners nationwide, who have told ConsumerAffairs.com for the past two years that their cats and dogs have experienced those same health problems after eating various flavors and varieties of NUTRO. ConsumerAffairs.com now has more than 800 complaints from dog and cat owners who say their pets have battled sudden and recurring bouts of vomiting yellow bile and explosive and often bloody diarrhea after eating NUTROs foods.

Many pet owners also say their dogs and cats became lethargic, had elevated liver enzymes, crystals in their urine, or been treated for pancreatitis and gastroenteritis after eating NUTROs pet food.

In nearly every case, pet owners say their animals health improved once they switched to another brand of food. Some pet owners also suspect NUTROs food played a role in their animals deaths.

NUTRO, however, says its food is 100 percent safe and meets all federal guidelines. The company also denies that it's under investigation by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) -- even though the FDAs Freedom of Information Office confirmed that probe to ConsumerAffairs.com.

New Jersey probe

Weve also learned that two FDA agents spent four hours last Friday investigating the recent and unexplained death of a 10-year-old Dalmatian in New Jersey. That is the third case ConsumerAffairs.com has confirmed in which FDA agents have investigated the deaths of dogs that have eaten NUTROs pet food.

In this latest case, Cheryl M. says her beloved Dalmatian, Ember, ate NUTRO food all her life. But earlier this month -- after Cheryl opened a new bag of NUTRO Light Lamb and Rice that she said had a foul smell -- Ember started spitting out the food.

Then she started vomiting the food and yellow bile that had a horrible smell, says Cheryl, who contacted the FDA and NUTRO before and after Ember's death.

Cheryls veterinarian diagnosed Ember with pancreatitis and an abdominal infection. Blood tests revealed the Dalmatian had an elevated white blood cell count. The vet prescribed anti-vomiting and other medications to help the sick dog. An ultrasound also revealed Embers liver and pancreas were normal and the Dalmatian did not have any tumors.

Ember died in Cheryls arms on May 18. My vet has no clue why she died, Cheryl told us, her voice cracking with sorrow.

During the FDAs visit to her home, Cheryl says the agents told her Embers death was a high priority. The agents said they were rushing Embers health records and lab results to the FDAs veterinarian in Maryland -- and promised to immediately test the Dalmatians food.

The FDA agents seemed extremely upset that Ember died, Cheryl says, adding the agents planned to also test the bag that Embers food came in. They did not look happy. When they opened the bag of her food, they did not want to touch it and said it smelled like petroleum.

They asked me what I wanted and I said, 'I want justice.' I dont want anybody else to go through what were going through. Were devastated by this.

News of NUTROs cat food recall only fueled Cheryls fury against the company. I was totally outraged and thought it was very convenient.

Her husband agrees.

When we first saw the news about the recall, we were angry, says Ken M., a New Jersey fireman. This (loss) has been really tough for all of us. And all these people are saying the same thing about NUTRO and NUTRO is not doing anything about it.

Other pet owners -- whose cats and dogs have become sick or died after NUTROs food -- echo the couples outrage and concerns.

Its a first step, but NUTRO cannot just look at that little bit of cat food. It needs to look at all its food, their ingredients, and sources, says Jean B. of Terre Haunte, Ind.

Earlier this year, Jeans kittens -- Rosie and Angus -- started vomiting yellow foamy bile, shedding hair, and having gas after she slowly introduced NUTRO into the felines diets.

NUTRO definitely needs to look at both its cat and dog foods -- they need to look at everything, Jean says, adding that her kittens health improved once she stopped feeding them NUTRO. Most of the complaints (on ConsumerAffairs.com) are from dog owners. I dont know why NUTRO wouldnt be concerned by all these complaints and why they would ignore them.

Someone is cutting corners, she adds. I just have to believe it comes down to money. Or NUTRO must have too much to lose -- and it must be something really bad if it comes out -- for them not to be taking care of this.

Jean is also shocked by the companys claim that it hasnt received any reports of illnesses linked to the recalled cat food.

Youve got to be kidding me. All these complaints are more than coincidental. Something is wrong. And in reading many letters (on ConsumerAffairs.com), pet owners say theyve called NUTRO and not gotten a warm reception. I dont believe they (NUTRO) havent received any complaints about the food. Everyday, there are new complaints on your Web site.

No surprise

NUTROs cat food recall didnt come as any surprise to Vinny B. of Tacoma, Washington.

It made sense, especially the way my cats reacted to NUTRO after the company was purchased (in 2007) by Mars. All three of my cats refused to eat the food anymore, they lost weight, and got sick. One of my cats was on medicine until three months ago to clear up urinary crystals.

We wondered what was going on and we called NUTRO, Vinny says. They said everything was the same.

Vinnys cats improved once he stopped feeding them NUTROs Natural Choice Complete Care Indoor Cat formula. So did his neighbors cats, which also became ill after eating NUTROs food.

We were talking and he said he had been feeding his cats Nutro and they had stopped eating, too. I told him we had issues (with NUTRO) and had switched food. He switched food and his cats started eating again. It is hard to believe this is all a fluke, Vinny says. I believe there is something wrong with the food.

What about NUTROs claim that it hasnt received any reports of illnesses linked to the recalled cat food?

When I heard that, it made me angry, Vinny says. I dont think thats very cool. I feel like something shady going on and they (NUTRO) are not being honest with the public.

Over the weekend, ConsumerAffairs.com heard from a Texas pet owner who says her cat became sick after eating NUTRO Max. And her veterinarian is baffled by the felines illness.

For seven weeks now, my cat has been unresponsive to antibiotics for treatment of urinary tract problems, Daphene M. told us. He continues to urinate blood. It clears up for a 10-day period, but returns. There is no sign of extreme infection, and X-rays indicate no stones present -- typically the cause.

The veterinarian is puzzled about the root cause. Now I see this recall for Nutro Max dry cat food. I have fed this to my cat exclusively for over three years now. My cats diagnosis remains unknown, (but) I feel perhaps this may be the cause of his problems.

Elkhound's death

Indiana pet owner Mark E. is certain Nutros food played a role in the 2008 death of his Norwegian Elkhound, Ali.

Shortly before Alis death, the healthy 11-year-old dog suddenly started having bloody diarrhea, vomiting, and quit eating. At the time, Ali was staying at a kennel while Mark and his family were on vacation. When Ali became sick, the kennel took her to its vet.

The vet said he thought she'd eaten something at the kennel," Mark recalls. "But we asked that if that's true, how come the only dog this happened to was the one that ate NUTRO. We have two dogs; our Collie was on a different food -- not a NUTRO brand. She was in the same run and she's fine.

"And we said: what did Ali eat that the other dog didn't. The only answer was the food.

Thats why Mark wasnt surprised when he heard the news that NUTRO had recalled some of its cat food.

I told my wife that this was only the tip of the iceberg. NUTRO says its food is 100 percent safe, but this cat food recall puts a dent in that claim. ... I feel somewhat vindicated in a way, he says of the recall. And I think that more (recalls) are coming, including of the dog food.

When asked if he believes NUTROs claim that it hasnt received any reports of illnesses linked to the recalled cat food, Mark told us: I think thats a C-Y-A. They know something is wrong. They are just trying to ease into this as gently as possible.

What about NUTROs claim that it isnt under investigation by the FDA? Mark says thats not true, either.

An FDA agent came out to my house (after Ali died) and took down all the information, he says. The agent said they'd (his FDA office) gotten a number of complaints about NUTRO. He said he was aware of the problems nationally and the problems included on your (ConsumerAffairs.com) Web site.

Zinc, copper levels

ConsumerAffairs.com also uncovered an interesting connection between the NUTRO food that Ali ate before her death and the NUTRO products involved in the cat food recall.

After Ali died, Marks vet sent the NUTRO food the Norwegian Elkhound had eaten to Purdue University for testing. Those tests were negative for melamine, salmonella, and e-coli, Mark said. But they did reveal the food contained high levels of zinc and copper.

Marks vet could not say if the food caused Alis death, but "he could not rule it out.

That isnt the only case in which NUTROs dog food has tested positive for high levels of zinc and copper.

Last August, tests by the non-profit Pet Food Products Safety Alliance (PFPSA) revealed samples of NUTROs Natural Choice Chicken Meal, Rice, and Oatmeal formula and Nutro Puppy Max contained levels of zinc and copper that PFPSA said exceeded the recommendations of the Association of American Feed Control Officials (AAFCO).

Specifically, the levels of zinc in the NUTRO dog foods tested were 260 parts per million, which PFPSA calculated would come to on the order of 40 times the amount of zinc recommended for human dietary requirements.

PFPSAs founder Don Earl says NUTROs cat food recall -- trigged by incorrect levels of zinc and potassium -- gives credence to his organizations test results.

I feel a certain amount of vindication as a result, particularly as the symptoms are identical to those reported by legions of dog owners, he told us.

But Earl is still worried about what pet food makers can legally put in their products.

The most frightening aspect of the situation is that from the research I've done, I believe it's possible to formulate a food within AAFCO tolerances, and still end up with a product that would be lethal to pets within a matter of days to weeks.

NUTRO, however, disputes PFPSAs lab results.

The claims regarding the safety of Nutro pet food in a recent report posted on the Pet Food Product Safety Alliance website are unfounded, the company states on its Web site. In order for a food to provide all the essential nutrition for a pet, it must exceed the minimum requirements for all essential nutrients. AAFCO has established Nutrient Profiles which identify these minimum dietary levels for all essential nutrients in canine pet food products.the 260- 400 mg/kg diet levels of Zinc found in NUTRO Natural Choice Chicken, Meal, Rice and Oatmeal Formula (which converts to approximately 288-444 mg/kg dry matter) are well within AAFCO recommended levels.

NUTRO didnt disclose the levels of zinc and potassium in its recalled cat foods, but said it was taking immediate action to pull the products off the market.

ConsumerAffairs.com contacted Trouw Nutrition, which supplied the zinc and potassium premix used in NUTROs recalled cat food. The company did not return our call.

NUTRO, however, has advised consumers to immediately stop feeding the recalled food to their cats.

But Gayle S. of Nevada -- whose Labradoodle recently become gravely ill after eating NUTROs dry puppy food -- says that warning isnt broad enough to calm her fears. She urges pet owners to immediately stop feeding their dogs and cats any NUTRO products.

I want them (NUTRO) to pull every single product off the shelves, she told us. It almost killed my puppy. I know something is wrong with that food. And, as a consumer, I would to see NUTRO off the market until it (the company) is 100 percent sure its food is not tainted.

Gayle says her five-month-old puppy, William, recently stopped eating, started vomiting yellow bile, and experiencing explosive diarrhea.

My dog exploded in the vets office, she says. There was urine and blood dripping from the dog. He had terrible diarrhea. When he tried to poop, red blood would be dripping out of the dog. Thats what scared me.

Campylobacter

Tests revealed William had Giardia, an infection that Gayle says the puppy could have caught from his litter mates. William in now on medication for that illness.

But the tests also revealed that William had another disease -- one Gayles vet said could be caused by contaminated food. That disease is called Campylobacter.

We shared Williams test results with veterinary toxicologist Steven Hansen, director of the American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (ASPCA) Poison Control Center.

This looks like an interesting case, he said. Campylobacter can be found in normal dogs and cats, which does complicate this. Yes, this bacterium can be obtained from contaminated food, water, fresh meats and the environment. I am very hopeful that the exact packets that were fed this pup will be cultured for possible bacterial contamination. Otherwise, there are many ways that dogs can consume material contaminated with Campylobacter.

Back in Nevada, Gayle continues to search for answers about her puppys illness.

Shes already contacted NUTRO and the FDA about Williams illness. NUTRO, she says, told her nothing could be wrong with its food and did not offer to test Williams food.

The FDA is now is trying to make arrangements to test Williams food. PetSmart has also offered to analyze the puppys food.

Conflicting stories

NUTROs recall came just days after ConsumerAffairs.com appealed a denial by the (FDA) to release consumer complaints and lab results related to the companys pet food.

ConsumerAffairs.com requested the documents last Spring under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). The FDA denied the request, saying the release of those the records could interfere with law enforcement proceedings. An FDA official, who spoke on the condition of anonymity, also told ConsumerAffairs.com that our request was denied because the agency was investigating NUTRO.

The FDA's Center for Veterinary Medicine (CVM), however, later issued a press release claiming NUTRO was not under investigation. But the CVM is not the FDA division that handles complaints about pet food and is not the division that confirmed the investigation.

ConsumerAffairs.com has also independently confirmed that FDA agents have investigated the deaths of dogs that ate NUTRO pet food.

Though the reports on whether the FDA is investigating Nutro have been conflicting, the FDAs official position is that there is no pending investigation of Nutro, said New York attorney, Cameron Stracher, who filed the appeal for ConsumerAffairs.com. Therefore, the FDA may not rely on the 'law enforcement' exemption of FOIA because, according to the FDA, there is no pending enforcement proceeding against Nutro.

Meanwhile, NUTRO said pet owners who have any of the recalled cat food can return the products for a full refund. Pet owners who have questions or concerns about the recall can contact NUTRO at 1-800-833-5330.

Read more ...

• Verbatim complaints and comments from consumers.
• Recall notice

Consumers React to NUTRO Recalls; Zinc, Copper Levels Cited...

NUTRO Recalls Dry Cat Food Sold in 11 Countries

By Truman Lewis
ConsumerAffairs.com

May 21, 2009
For more than a year, NUTRO Pet Products has shrugged off consumer complaints about dogs and cats becoming ill and even dying after eating the company's food. The company's public relations agents have insisted the food was "100 percent safe" and both NUTRO and the taxpayer-supported agency charged with regulating the safety of animal feed — the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) — have denied there is any kind of investigation into NUTRO products.

But today, the FDA announced a recall of more than 20 kinds of dry NUTRO cat food that has been sold in at least 11 countries, including all 50 states in the U.S. The FDA allowed the company to write the press release, which was then posted on the official FDA Web site. The company-written statement repeatedly stresses that the recall is voluntary and pins the blame on an unidentified supplier who supposedly allowed excessive levels of zinc and under-supplemented potassium in its premix. (Complete list) The company takes credit for finding the problem.

As usual, the company claimed it has received no consumer complaints about the recalled cat food but said cat owners should monitor their cat for symptoms, including a reduction in appetite or refusal of food, weight loss, vomiting or diarrhea. If a cat is experiencing health issues or is pregnant, consumers should contact their veterinarian.

However, among the more than 800 consumer complaints ConsumerAffairs.com has received about NUTRO products since 2007, many have been about illnesses and deaths involving cats. Many of the aggrieved consumers also contacted NUTRO.

"I was approached by a rep for Nutro Cat food in January 2009," said Jean of Terre Haute, Ind. "I told her we had just adopted two Ragdoll kittens and she told us that Nutro brand was so good and natural and she had Ragdolls and it would be very good for them, etc. We purchased it and slowly changed their food over to Nutro. They began vomiting yellow and were shedding hair like crazy and had gas, etc. I found this site and was horrified to read what folks have been going thru and ... dodged a bullet by switching cat food immediately."

Linda of Richmond, British Columbia, tried to speak to NUTRO about one of her cats began vomiting after eating NUTRO and another refused to eat it.

"I got worried and phoned their company and was eventually yelled at by Diane, the consumer receptionist. I contacted the store where I bought it, and was told another client complained of a very sick cat. A rep contacted me and was rude to me. I ended up throwing the crap out and putting them on Kirkland cat food. My cat gained back ALL of her weight within 2 months. I was treated very badly by those roaches at Nutro."

FDA all the way

Besides publishing NUTRO's carefully-crafted and self-congratulatory press release verbatim — and without making any attempt to verify the truth or falsity of the claim that the company had not received any complaints about the problem — the FDA has for months gone out of its way to avoid giving offense to the company, owned by the powerful Mars Corp., of McLean, Va., one of the world's largest pet food and candy producers.

When ConsumerAffairs.com asked FDA about the consumer problems with NUTRO — which are many times more numerous than for other brands of pet food — the agency had little to say. Reporter Lisa Wade McCormick last spring filed a Freedom of Information Action (FOIA) request last spring, asking for all consumer complaints, investigatory reports and lab tests that the agency had in its files.

After the usual delay of many months, the agency's Center for Veterinary Medicine (CVM) responded, saying it did not have any such documents and referred the request to other FDA departments. The request was eventually denied on the grounds that supplying the documents would jeopardize ongoing investigations. Questioned by McCormick, an FDA official who spoke on the condition of anonymity said that the request was denied because the agency was investigating NUTRO.

But just a few days later, the CVM — which had already conceded that it would have no responsibility for such an investigation — issued a press release claiming that NUTRO was not being investigated and asserting that reports otherwise were in error. Earlier this week, ConsumerAffairs.com appealed the agency's latest refusal to release the documents.

"Though the reports on whether the FDA is investigating Nutro have been conflicting, the FDAs official position is that there is no pending investigation of Nutro. Therefore, the FDA may not rely on the 'law enforcement' exemption of FOIA because, according to the FDA, there is no pending enforcement proceeding against Nutro," said Cameron Stracher, a New York attorney who represents ConsumerAffairs.com.

Facts and true facts

Despite the FDA's denial that it is investigating NUTRO, consumers have confirmed that FDA inspectors came to their homes investigating their pets' deaths.

In one instance, the FDA investigator told a consumer that he had learned of her pet's death by reading her complaint on ConsumerAffairs.com.

"The FDA's odd insistence that there is no investigation — when all the evidence indicates that there is — leads to an even more obvious and urgent question," said James R. Hood, president of ConsumerAffairs.com. "If the agency is telling the truth and there is indeed no investigation, it seems logical to ask, 'Why isn't there?'"

"One would think that NUTRO and the FDA would be curious as to why so many pet owners have reported their animals became ill after eating NUTRO products and — in some cases — mysteriously improved when they were switched to other foods. A public relations blitz won't get to the bottom of it. The FDA needs to stop stalling and do its job," Hood said.

Earlier this week, Sherri of Ann Arbor, Mich., wrote about her experience with NUTRO: "My pure bred Portuguese water dog began vomiting, having loose stools and acting lethargic after 4 months on Nutro Natural Choice Herring & Rice Formula. The vet could not explain, blood levels normal, intestinal antibiotics/probiotics given, intestines 2x normal size, surgery revealed no obstructions, every time food was readministered it began again. Vet suggested I stop Nutro after learning about other dogs problems. My dog is now on Natural Balance and is doing perfectly fine."

Sherri said she contacted NUTRO about a week ago. They said they'd contact her vet, but so far, they have not, she said. They also said they'd send her an envelope for samples of the food. She said they have yet to do that.

In her posting, Sherri urged other pet owners to contact the FDA and ask it to investigate.

Read more ...

• Verbatim complaints and comments from consumers.
• Recall notice

For more than a year, NUTRO Pet Products has shrugged off consumer complaints about dogs and cats becoming ill and even dying after eating the company's fo...

Article Image

Nutro Recalls Dry Cat Food Products

May 21, 2009
Nutro Products has announced a voluntary recall of select varieties of NUTRO NATURAL CHOICE COMPLETE CARE Dry Cat Foods and NUTRO MAX Cat Dry Foods with Best If Used By Dates between May 12, 2010 and August 22, 2010. The cat food is being voluntarily recalled in the United States and ten additional countries. This recall is due to incorrect levels of zinc and potassium in our finished product resulting from a production error by a US-based premix supplier.

Two mineral premixes were affected. One premix contained excessive levels of zinc and under-supplemented potassium. The second premix under-supplemented potassium. Both zinc and potassium are essential nutrients for cats and are added as nutritional supplements to NUTRO dry cat food.

The company said the probelm was identified during an audit of the documentation from the supplier. A company spokesman said an "extensive review confirmed that only these two premixes were affected." The recall does not affect any NUTRO dog food products, wet dog or cat food, or dog and cat treats.

Affected product was distributed to retail customers in all 50 states, as well as to customers in Canada, Mexico, Japan, Korea, Thailand, Malaysia, Singapore, Indonesia, New Zealand, and Israel. The company said it is working with all of its distributors and retail customers, in both the US and internationally, to ensure that the recalled products are not on store shelves. These products should not be sold or distributed further.

Consumers who have purchased affected product should immediately discontinue feeding the product to their cats, and switch to another product with a balanced nutritional profile. While the company said it has received no consumer complaints related to this issue, cat owners should monitor their cat for symptoms, including a reduction in appetite or refusal of food, weight loss, vomiting or diarrhea. If your cat is experiencing health issues or is pregnant, consumers should contact their veterinarian.

Consumers who have purchased product affected by this recall should return it to their retailer for a full refund or exchange for another NUTRO dry cat food product. Cat owners who have questions about the recall should call 1-800-833-5330 between the hours 8:00 AM to 4:30 PM CST, or visit www.nutroproducts.com.

Recalled Pet Food

The varieties of NUTRO NATURAL CHOICE COMPLETE CARE Dry Cat Foods and NUTRO MAX Cat Dry Foods listed below with Best If Used By Dates between May 12, 2010 and August 22, 2010 are affected by this recall.

U.S. Product Name

Bag Size

UPC

NUTRO® NATURAL CHOICE® COMPLETE CARE® Kitten Food4 lbs0 79105 20607 5
NUTRO® NATURAL CHOICE® COMPLETE CARE®  Kitten Food8 lbs.0 79105 20608 2
NUTRO® NATURAL CHOICE® COMPLETE CARE®  Kitten Food (Bonus Bag)9.2 lbs. 0 79105 20695 2
NUTRO® NATURAL CHOICE® COMPLETE CARE®  Kitten Food20 lbs0 79105 20609 9
NUTRO® NATURAL CHOICE® COMPLETE CARE®  Kitten Food (Sample Bag)1.5 oznone
NUTRO® NATURAL CHOICE® COMPLETE CARE®  Adult4 lbs0 79105 20610 5
NUTRO® NATURAL CHOICE® COMPLETE CARE®  Adult8 lbs.0 79105 20611 2
NUTRO® NATURAL CHOICE® COMPLETE CARE®  Adult (Bonus Bag)9.2 lbs0 79105 20694 5
NUTRO® NATURAL CHOICE® COMPLETE CARE® Adult20 lbs0 79105 20612 9
NUTRO® NATURAL CHOICE® COMPLETE CARE® Adult (Sample Bag)1.5 oznone
NUTRO® NATURAL CHOICE® COMPLETE CARE®  Adult Oceanfish Flavor4 lbs0 79105 20622 8
NUTRO® NATURAL CHOICE® COMPLETE CARE® Adult Oceanfish Flavor8 lbs0 79105 20623 5
NUTRO® NATURAL CHOICE® COMPLETE CARE® Adult Oceanfish Flavor (Bonus Bag)9.2 lbs. 0 79105 20698 3
NUTRO® NATURAL CHOICE® COMPLETE CARE® Adult Oceanfish Flavor20 lbs0 79105 20624 2
NUTRO® MAX® Cat Adult Roasted Chicken Flavor3 lbs0 79105 10228 5
NUTRO® MAX® Cat Adult Roasted Chicken Flavor6 lbs0 79105 10229 2
NUTRO® MAX® Cat Adult Roasted Chicken Flavor16 lbs0 79105 10230 8
NUTRO® MAX® Cat Adult Roasted Chicken Flavor (Sample Bag)1.5 oznone
NUTRO® MAX® Cat Indoor Adult Roasted Chicken Flavor3 lbs0 79105 10243 8
NUTRO® MAX® Cat Indoor Adult Roasted Chicken Flavor6 lbs0 79105 10244 5
NUTRO® MAX® Cat Indoor Adult Roasted Chicken Flavor16 lbs0 79105 10245 2
NUTRO® MAX® Cat Indoor Adult Roasted Chicken Flavor (Sample Bag)1.5 oznone
NUTRO® MAX® Cat Indoor Adult Salmon Flavor3 lbs0 79105 10246 9
NUTRO® MAX® Cat Indoor Adult Salmon Flavor6 lbs0 79105 10247 6
NUTRO® MAX® Cat Indoor Adult Salmon Flavor16 lbs0 79105 10248 3
NUTRO® MAX® Cat Indoor Weight Control3 lbs0 79105 10249 0
NUTRO® MAX® Cat Indoor Weight Control6 lbs0 79105 10250 6
NUTRO® MAX® Cat Indoor Weight Control16 lbs0 79105 10251 3

Read verbatim complaints and comments from consumers.

Nutro Products has announced a voluntary recall of select varieties of NUTRO NATURAL CHOICE COMPLETE CARE Dry Cat Foods and NUTRO MAX Cat Dry Foods....

Consumer Site Appeals FDA's Refusal to Release NUTRO Records

May 19, 2009
ConsumerAffairs.com has appealed the refusal of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to release lab results, citizen complaints and other documents related to NUTRO pet food.

The consumer Web site has received more than 800 reports from consumers who say their pets became ill and, in some cases, died after eating NUTRO products. ConsumerAffairs.com first requested the FDA documents under the Freedom of Information Action (FOIA) last spring, but the FDA denied the request, saying that granting it could interfere with law enforcement proceedings.

Questioned by ConsumerAffairs.com reporter Lisa Wade McCormick, an FDA official who spoke on the condition of anonymity said that the request was denied because the agency was investigating NUTRO. But the FDA's Center for Veterinary Medicine (CVM) then issued a press release claiming that NUTRO was not being investigated.

The CVM is not the FDA division that handles complaints about pet food and is not the division to which the FDA employee who confirmed the investigation is assigned.

"Though the reports on whether the FDA is investigating Nutro have been conflicting, the FDAs official position is that there is no pending investigation of Nutro. Therefore, the FDA may not rely on the 'law enforcement' exemption of FOIA because, according to the FDA, there is no pending enforcement proceeding against Nutro," said Cameron Stracher, a New York attorney who represents ConsumerAffairs.com.

Despite the FDA's denial that it is investigating NUTRO, consumers have confirmed that FDA inspectors came to their homes investigating their pets' deaths.

In one instance, the FDA investigator told a consumer that he had learned of her pet's death by reading her complaint on ConsumerAffairs.com.

Why not?

"The FDA's odd insistence that there is no investigation -- when all the evidence indicates that there is -- leads to an even more obvious and urgent question," said James R. Hood, president of ConsumerAffairs.com. "If the agency is telling the truth and there is indeed no investigation, it seems logical to ask 'Why isn't there?'"

"One would think that NUTRO and the FDA would be curious as to why so many pet owners have reported their animals became ill after eating NUTRO products and -- in some cases -- mysteriously improved when they were switched to other foods. A public relations blitz won't get to the bottom of it. The FDA needs to stop stalling and do its job," Hood said.

Just yesterday, Sherri of Ann Arbor, Mich., wrote about her experience with NUTRO: "My pure bred Portuguese water dog began vomiting, having loose stools and acting lethargic after 4 months on Nutro Natural Choice Herring & Rice Formula. The vet could not explain, blood levels normal, intestinal antibiotics/probiotics given, intestines 2x normal size, surgery revealed no obstructions, every time food was readministered it began again. Vet suggested I stop Nutro after learning about other dogs problems. My dog is now on Natural Balance and is doing perfectly fine."

Sherri said she contacted NUTRO about a week ago. They said they'd contact her vet, but so far, they have not, she said. They also said they'd send her an envelope for samples of the food. She said they have not done that, either.

In her posting, Sherri urged other pet owners to contact the FDA and ask it to investigate.

Read verbatim complaints and comments from consumers.

Consumer Site Appeals FDA's Refusal to Release NUTRO Records...

NUTRO Pulls Greenies Dental Chews from Supermarkets

By Truman Lewis
ConsumerAffairs.com

May 4, 2009
NUTRO Products, Inc. says it is pulling its Greenies line of pet dental chews from supermarkets and other mass markets. Beginning in June, the Greenies — which have been blamed for illness and deaths in some dogs and cats — will be distributed only through veterinary hospitals and pet specialty retailers.

We believe that pet medical professionals at veterinary hospitals and well-trained, knowledgeable staff at pet specialty stores are best equipped to answer pet owners questions about our products and to make the right recommendation, said Carolyn Hanigan, vice president of marketing for Nashville, Tenn.-based NUTRO.

The company said that staff education was a primary concern for the Greenies dental chew line, as each of five sizes is formulated for a corresponding weight range

It's the latest attempt to resolve highly-publicized incidents of pet deaths attributed to the popular treats. Pet owners said the treats failed to be properly digested and led to fatal intestinal obstructions.

In February 2006, the company said it would clarify the instructions on the packaging. The green-tinted treats are in the shape of a toothbrush and are promoted as an effective way to prevent gum disease in animals and promote oral health.

Reformulated

The dental chews were reformulated to be "more highly soluble and thus safer, yet effective as a daily preventive of oral disease," the company said in a November 2007 statement. Independent studies conducted by the University of Illinois confirmed the high solubility of Greenies, according to the statement, which said that the Veterinary Oral Health Council (VOHC) had awarded its Seal of Acceptance to Greenies for plaque and tartar control.

In 2005, a New York couple filed a $5 million lawsuit against Greenies' then-manufacturer, S&M NuTec, charging the treats are unsafe and inadequately labeled. The couple charged an undigested Greenie caused the death of their four-year-old Dachshund. The company was later acquired by NUTRO.

Jennifer Reiff and Michael Eastwood say their minature dachshund died two days after they fed him a petit-sized Greenie.

The couple told WCBS-TV in New York that the day after giving the dog the treat, they took him to the vet where he underwent emergency surgery for a blocked intestine. Reiff and Eastwood say it was a portion of a Greenie that caused the problem. Their pet died two days later.

KIRO-TV in Seattle reported in 2005 that the Food and Drug Administration had begun an investigation of the complaints but nothing more was ever heard of the supposed probe.

Pet owners complain

ConsumerAffairs.com has received complaints from several pet owners whose pets died or became ill after chewing the popular treats.

"We gave such a treat to our Japanese Chin on Friday and she is dead," said Mary of Sayville, N.Y. in September 2007. "The vet did an autopsy and she choked on a piece of this allegedly digestive greenie. My vet told me that a number of dogs have either choked to death or died as a result of intestinal blockages caused by Greenies."

Rose of Phenix City, Ala., said in September 2006 that her Maltese became ill after eating a Greenie: "She couldn't eat or drink. She almost died. ... My dog was sick for 2 weeks and was in the intensive care and given IVs."

Lisa of Simi Valley, Calif. was luckier.

"My Standard Poodle, Hummer, got into a bag of Greenies which had not even been opened — they were still sealed in the bag in the shipping box. He weighs around 54 pounds and ate appoximately 8oz. Later he was rushed to the pet Emergency Clinic had to spend the night and we were told to watch him carefully the next several days," she said in a 2006 complaint.

Lisa said Hummer was rushed back to the hopsital in Noctober for emergency surgery.

Developed by dog owners

Greenies were developed in the late 1990s when two dog owners, Joe and Judy Roetheli, teamed with a well-known board-certified veterinary nutritionist to develop a dog chew treat formulated to control dental tartar, plaque and gingivitis, and formulated to taste great while reducing bad breath.

NUTRO is owned by Mars, Inc., one of the world's largest producers of pet food, confectionary, beverage, food and health food. The privately-held company is headquartered in McLean, Va.

A division of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has denied that it is investigating NUTRO Products Inc., whose pet foods are the subject of more than 700 complaints from consumers who say their dogs and cats became ill and, in some cases, died after eating NUTRO products.

NUTRO Pulls Greenies Dental Chews from Supermarkets...

Article Image

Feds Deny NUTRO Investigation; Witnesses Say Otherwise

A division of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has denied that it is investigating NUTRO Products Inc., whose pet foods are the subject of more than 700 complaints from consumers who say their dogs and cats became ill and, in some cases, died after eating NUTRO products.

But consumers who fed their dogs NUTRO have confirmed that FDA inspectors came to their homes investigating their pets' deaths. And the FDA is still refusing to release information about NUTRO, saying that to do so could hamper law enforcement efforts.

"They can't have it both ways," said James R. Hood, president of ConsumerAffairs.com, which has a long-pending Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request for information the agency has gathered about NUTRO. "If there's no investigation, they must release the files, which are public property. That's the law."

Tuesday's denial came from the FDA's Center for Veterinary Medicine (CVM), which is not the FDA division that handles complaints about pet food.

But an FDA official, who is not with the CVM, told ConsumerAffairs.com last week that the agency is investigating the pet food maker. The person, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because he or she was not authorized to talk to the media, said the investigation could be civil or criminal in nature.

Investigation confirmed

Despite the backtracking of the FDA and the denials of NUTRO's publicists, ConsumerAffairs.com has confirmed that FDA agents in Indiana have investigated the deaths of three dogs in that state. All three of those dogs ate NUTRO.

Earlier this week, a consumer in Evansville, Ind., said that the FDA came to his home last August after the death of his healthy 11-year-old dog, Ali, a Norwegian Elkhound, who died on July 13, 2008.

"An FDA agent came out to my house and took down all the information," said the pet owner, Mark D. "The agent said they'd (his FDA office) gotten a number of complaints about NUTRO. He said he was aware of the problems nationally and the problems included on your (ConsumerAffairs.com) Web site." Mark said he talked to the agent several times after the agent visited his home.

Mark said he and his family went on vacation last July and took Ali and their other dog — a Collie — to the kennel. "We took her to this same kennel for many years and Ali always ate well."

The kennel's owner, however, noticed that Ali suddenly had bloody diarrhea, was vomiting and not eating. The kennel took Ollie to its vet.

"The vet said he thought she'd eaten something at the kennel," Mark said. "But we asked that if that's true, how come the only dog this happened to was the one that ate NUTRO. We have two dogs; our Collie was on a different food — not a NUTRO brand. She was in the same run and she's fine.

"And we said what did Ali eat that the other dog didn't. The only answer was the food."

Ali then took a turn for the worse. She died on July 13, 2008.

"It was awful," Mark said. "This was a healthy, 11-year-old dog that was taken to the vet once a year. We have all her records."

After Ali's death, Mark had a necropsy done on his beloved dog. That autopsy revealed that Ali died of septicemia (bacteria in the blood) and disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC).

"The vet said the infection started in the GI tract, and he did not see any signs of melamine poising," Mark said. "Additionally, there was a growth on her spleen the size of a softball. When I asked him (the vet) how long the growth could have been there, he said a week or two at the most."

The vet could not say if the food caused her death, but "he could not rule it out," Mark said.

Mark said his vet urged him to contact the FDA, which he did. His vet also sent Ali's NUTRO food to Purdue University for testing. Those tests, Mark said, were negative for melamine, salmonella and e-coli.

Nonetheless, Mark is convinced the NUTRO food played a role in Ali's death. "I don't see how it could be anything else," he said. "It's terrible to lose a dog, especially in that manner...to go like that is not deserved at all."

Mark says he just wants answers about what happened to his dog. "That would be great. I would love to have NUTRO admit this was its fault — or it it wasn't their fault — to find a reason for what happened so it won't happen again."

Another investigation

ConsumerAffairs.com has also confirmed that the FDA investigated the April 2008 deaths of two Italian Greyhound dogs in Indiana. The dogs' owner told us an FDA agent came to her home, took a report, and tested samples of the NUTRO food those dogs ate. Those tests, however, did not find any toxins in the food. Autopsies indicated the dogs died from antifreeze poisoning. The dogs owner doesnt believe those findings, saying there is no antifreeze around her home.

Hundreds of pet owners nationwide have told ConsumerAffairs.com their dogs and cats have experienced sudden and recurring bouts of vomiting, diarrhea and other gastrointestinal problems after eating various flavors of NUTRO. In nearly every case, the animals recovered after their owners switched them to another brand of pet food. Others, however, died. To date, ConsumerAffairs.com has talked to the owners of seven dogs who suspect their pets deaths are linked to NUTRO food but cannot prove it and are hoping for government help.

NUTRO has repeatedly defended its products, and also denies that it is being investigated. Mars recalled 20-pound bags of Pedigree dog food last year, saying it might be contaminated with salmonella.

Menu investigation

Another pet food company, Menu Foods, said in a recent financial filing that the FDA had commenced a criminal investigation to determine whether Menu violated the Food, Drug, & Cosmetic Act. The company noted that additional actions or investigations may arise in the future. It did not mention any other pet food companies. Menu last year settled a $24 million lawsuit that grew from the largest pet food recall in U.S. history.

NUTRO is a division of privately-held Mars, Inc., which is not required to file the extensive financial disclosure statements required of publicly-traded companies. After NUTRO was acquired by Mars in 2007, Mars was fined a record 4.5 million (about US$5.8 million) by the German Federal Cartel Office (FCO) for not observing the required waiting period before closing the transaction.

Mars had been by far the leading provider of cat and dog food in Germany prior to the merger. NUTRO also had extensive marketing operations in Europe, but under pressure from the German regulators, Mars divested NUTRO's Austrian and German businesses.

Request denied

News of the FDA investigation came to light last week after the FDA denied a Freedom of Information Act request filed by ConsumerAffairs.com seeking a list of all NUTRO complaints and lab results the agency had collected since 2007, which is when NUTRO became a subsidiary of the privately-held Mars Corp. Mars manufactures candies including M&M's, Snickers, KitKats, Mars Bars and Skittles. Half of its business comes from pet care products, including Pedigree, Whiskas, Royal Canin and Cesar pet foods.

In its denial letter, the FDA said the records ConsumerAffairs.com requested were compiled for law enforcement purposes and releasing those documents could interfere with law enforcement proceedings.

In an earlier letter ConsumerAffairs.com received from the FDA — one dated September 5, 2008 — the Center for Veterinary Medicine denied our FOIA request, saying: The FDA's Center for Veterinary Medicine has no responsive records to your request. Complaints regarding adverse reactions to pet foods are filed with the district office consumer complaint coordinator located in the state where the complainant resides."

NUTRO has been citing the Center for Veterinary Medicines denial as proof the FDA is not investigating the company, and the CVM yesterday released a statement saying that "a media report incorrectly concluded and reported that Nutro Products Inc. was the subject of an investigation." But the official ConsumerAffairs.com spoke with last week was not assigned to the Center for Veterinary Medicine. That person is with another division of the FDA.

Media wags its tail

The media response to the dust-up illustrates the sorry effects of the cutback in newspaper reporting staffs and television's increasing use of empty-suit commentators filling positions once held by actual journalists.

The story has simply been ignored by most major newspapers and broadcasters. The few who have touched it have been content with scraps tossed their way by NUTRO and the government.

CNN took its cue from the company's publicists on its 7:41 a.m. newscast a few days ago, as newsreader Robin Meade aired a "clarification of a report that involved a report from ConsumerAffairs.com."

"It (the report) said that the FDA is investigating NUTRO pet foods. It said the independent Web site — which is not affiliated with the federal Consumer Protection Agency (sic) or Consumer Reports — it said it got hundreds of complaints from dog and cat owners who said their pets got sick or died ... but the FDA tells CNN that ConsumerAffairs is wrong and it's not investigating NUTRO."

CNN did not contact ConsumerAffairs.com or any of the 700 consumers who have taken the time to tell their stories but relied totally on the assurances of government and corporate publicists whose interests lie in advancing their employers' interests, not ferreting out the truth.

"NUTRO says in a statement to CNN that it wants to assure its consumers, associates and retailers that its products undergo rigorous product assurance testing and are safe and conform to the specific standards set by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration — that's a quote," Meade exclaimed.

"Now as far as the complaints from the pet owners," she continued, "NUTRO says an analysis of the products complained about determined them to be safe and that there was nothing in the pet health issues caused by NUTRO pet food."

Professional groups have also shown little concern, labeling the reports of pet illness "anecdotal." Dr. Kimberly May of the American Veterinary Medical Association (AVMA) discounted the source of the reports.

Based on previous experiences with ConsumerAffairs.com, they dont let the truth get in the way of a good story," she said on a trade group forum. "They were one of the sites propagating the microchips cause cancer in pets rumors a few years ago, without any science whatsoever to back up their statements.

May's statement is completely false — no such story ever appeared on ConsumerAffairs.com, Hood, the Web site's president and editor, said. May has since retracted the statement but has not apologized.

"The complete disregard for fact-checking that prevails in today's world is just mind-boggling," Hood said. "People who are supposed to be respected professionals say the first thing that comes into their head while completely ignoring the entreaties of the consumers whose interests they are supposed to protect."

"Any incident can be called anecdotal. A story of a fatal assault during an armed robbery is anecdotal, but that doesn't mean it didn't happen and that measures should not be taken to capture the offenders and try to prevent future occurrences," he said. "The press and responsible professionals are supposed to investigate — not wait for corporate and government mouthpieces to hand them their talking points."

Worrisome trend

ConsumerAffairs.com filed its Freedom of Information request for NUTRO records last year after an analysis of consumer complaints revealed that scores of pets from California to South Carolina had experienced sudden and recurring bouts of diarrhea, vomiting, and other digestive problems.

A common denominator among those dogs and cats was NUTRO pet food. In many cases, consumers said their pets conditions improved once their owners stopped feeding them NUTRO pet food. Some animals died, however.

ConsumerAffairs.com continues to receive complaints about NUTRO from dog and cat owners nationwide. In the past year, consumers have filed more than 600 complaints saying their dogs or cats suddenly became ill after eat NUTRO. The problems these pets have experienced are similar: vomiting, diarrhea, and other digestive issues.

Most of the complaints mirror one from Linda P. of New Baltimore, Michigan.

For three years, I have been feeding my dog NUTRO Natural Choice Lamb Meal & Rice Formula Small Bites Dry Dog Food, she said. The last bag I bought, I notice the food color was lighter than in the past. Me being who I am, I believed there was a change in formula for the better. My Dachshund/Lab became ill, vomiting food chunks and yellow bile as well. We took him to the vet and I have been feeding him homemade chicken and rice and antibiotics and he is on the mend.

She adds: How can so many dogs get sick and nothing be done? Today I will start mixing his homemade food with a different brand of dry food. I never want anyone else to go through, what appears to be many, the same situation as our dogs. It will be a week or two before Im sure my dog is okay.

NUTRO denies it

NUTRO defends its products and insists its food is safe. Many NUTRO customers also tout the food, saying their pets have had no problems. And veterinarians say several factors can cause gastrointestinal problems in dogs and cats, including changes in diet, newly developed sensitivities to pet foods, and viral infections.

But pet owners who complain to ConsumerAffairs.com on a nearly daily basis are convinced something is wrong with NUTROs food. And they say its no coincidence that so many dogs and cats have become sick — with the same symptoms — after eating various flavors of that pet food.

NUTRO makes dogs sick, says Erin of Encino, California. It is a fact and Im outraged that nobody is taking it off the shelf.

Erin says her three-year-old Puggle was a healthy active dog until she started eating NUTRO Natural Choice Lamb Meal & Rice Formula and NUTRO Max Beef & Rice Dinner Chunks in Gravy: After about two weeks of this food, she became sick. (She was) constipated for a few days, then had diarrhea, and finally vomiting and was always extremely thirsty. The last straw was her laying lethargic on the couch with white gums.

Thats when Erin rushed her dog to the vet.

The vet said she had allergies, prescribed an antibiotic and cortisone and gave me a bag of Science Diet. I feed her the Science Diet in place of NUTRO because it was free, and she was fine within a week.

Erin, however, says she made the mistake of switching her dog back to NUTRO after the Science Diet was gone.

She again had constipation, followed by horrible diarrhea, and finally vomiting yellow bile and white gums, Erin told us. There is no way that all these stories are just coincidences (not) if my dog is fine when she isnt eating NUTRO and when she is eating it, shes horribly sick. I have switched her back to Science Diet and all her symptoms are gone and her appetite has returned to normal.

Another California pet owner says her dog also became ill after eating NUTRO pet food.

My husband and I purchased NUTRO chicken and rice small bites for our two Chihuahuas, says Jessica of Larkspur. After about five days, our six-year-old male Chihuahua became lethargic, groaned a lot, developed a fever, was not excited to go on walks, and lost excitement for anything that used to bring him joy.

My husband began to suspect it was the new food as he had only developed these symptoms after eating NUTRO. He has always been a healthy and active Chihuahua.

The couple took the dog to their vet, who ran tests but couldnt pinpoint the problem. He was given antibiotics and we are crossing our fingers they work. Our Chihuahua can barely walk, he is groaning in pain, and is extremely depressed.

Across the country, a longtime NUTRO pet owner in Pennsylvania told us her dog suddenly became ill after eating the food.

I had been feeding my dog NUTRO for years, says Amy D. of Webster, Pennsylvania. I started feeding her NUTRO for sensitive stomachs about 6 months ago. At first everything seemed fine. Then my dog, who never urinated in my house, started having accidents (frequently). She needed to go out constantly and would squat repeatedly, come in, and ask to go right back out. I took her to the vet and began treatment for bladder infection. Upon finishing treatment it started all over again.

Amys vet discovered crystals in the dogs urine, which also had a high PH balance. The vet put the dog on another medication.

In the meantime other than the restless pacing to go outside, she seemed disinterested and lethargic, Amy says. Then she began having extremely loose bowel movements (an awful bright yellow) in the house.

Amy launched her own investigation and discovered the scores of complaints about NUTRO on ConsumerAffairs.com.

I couldn't believe my eyes. Could it really be the dog food I had trusted so much making my beloved pet ill? I immediately threw away all my NUTRO dog food.

Amy is now feeding her dog another brand of pet food. And Im thrilled to say she is her old self again. She no longer has to take any medicines and has no more accidents or uncontrollable urges. Thanks to this Web site and everyone who took the time to file a complaint, I have my healthy happy dog back.

Not a fluke?

A pet owner in New York said his puppy had the same experience as Amys dog after eating NUTRO. And hes convinced its not a fluke.

We got our dog two weeks ago and our puppy was healthy when we got her, says Manny of Fresh Meadows, New York. She started eating NUTRO Natural Choice for puppies, since it was recommended by a friend of ours. A week later, she started squatting to urinate, but only small drops or none at all came out. When she can urinate, it is frequent, in small amounts, and contains blood.

Manny took his puppy to the vet, who prescribed amoxicillin.

She received a sonogram, culture test, and urinalysis test. The results showed that she may have a stone in her bladder. The blood in her urine is caused by the stone scraping the bladder walls. The urinalysis test showed that she had a high PH balance. I don't think it is a coincidence that I have the same exact problem as Amy, adds Manny. I wonder if something is wrong NUTRO pet food again. Our puppy is still sick.

ConsumerAffairs.com's investigation into the complaints weve received about NUTRO pet food has also revealed:

• Four dogs unexpectedly died — or were euthanized — in 2008 after eating NUTRO pet food. Besides the dogs in Indiana, the other dogs include a Beagle/Whippet mix in Pennsylvania, two German Shepherd puppies in North Carolina, and a Doberman Pinscher in Texas. Those owners have not tested the NUTRO food their dogs ate before they died;

• Two Italian Greyhounds at a military base in Italy became sick after eating NUTRO food. The dogs owner told us she hopes the FDA is investigating NUTRO and urged the agency to move quickly. It is hard to tell how many people at overseas military bases are feeding this (food) to their dogs and possibly killing them, says Michelle M. who bought her dogs NUTRO food at the bases commissary.

• A pet nutrition specialist for NUTRO told us shes heard complaints about the companys food making dogs and cats sick. She reported those concerns to her supervisor, but said they were ignored. She later resigned.

Some pet owners, however, say NUTRO is the only brand of food their dogs and cats can eat.

My Shar-peis are the most sensitive dogs I have ever owned, says Allison R. of Nampa, Indiana. On the wrong food their hair falls out, their eyes weep and their ears get nasty. It takes me a good 3 months of only NUTRO dog food in order to reverse the affects of the other food. I have found that the senior diet is what works best, not sure why, but it seems to keep my Shar-Peis looking healthy.

A Tennessee pet owner also defends NUTRO pet food — and warns consumers not to jump to conclusions based on Internet complaints.

I feed all of my dogs and cats Nutro products and they are just as healthy as they have ever been, says Brenda of Springfield, Tennessee. They have healthy shiny coats and their stools are firm.

Gradual transition

Brenda also had some advice to pet owners switching brands of food.

Do a gradual transition from the old food, she said. If you dont, your dog will likely experience these issues. Not every bout of diarrhea, constipation, bladder infection, liver and kidney failure and loss of excitement to go on walks should be attributed to food. Your first responsibility as a pet owner should be to take your dog to the vet before you blame anyone. Do your research and don't let any Web site diagnose your pet.

NUTRO has repeatedly insisted its food is 100 percent safe and meets all standards set by FDA, the U.S Department of Agriculture (USDA) and the Association of American Feed Control Officials (AAFCO). A spokeswoman said all NUTRO products are tested for melamine, molds, toxins and other bacteria. And she called the complaints weve received isolated reports of inaccurate information posted online.

The company, however, set up a special a section on its Web site in response to the issues and concerns raised in the ConsumerAffairs.com stories. NUTRO said it takes all customer complaints seriously and encouraged pet owners with concerns about the food to contact the company at 1-800-833-5330.

Veterinarians have said its not uncommon for pets to have sudden bouts of vomiting, diarrhea, and other gastrointestinal problems. They also said a number of factors — pet food, stress, or a viral infection — could be the culprit.

Dr. Steven Hansen, a veterinary toxicologist with the American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (ASPCA), reviewed some of the NUTRO complaints, in an effort to find out why so many pets have become sick — or even died — after eating NUTRO food.

Unfortunately the cases are not consistent and appear to be anecdotal with no real definitive diagnostic findings, Dr. Hansen said. Without any consistent trends in findings we can not do anything any further. This does appear to us to be a situation where bad things happen, but they are not likely food-related.

Hansen, however, said consumers who suspect NUTROs food is a factor in their pets illnesses should have their animals examined by a veterinarian and document the problems.

I would also recommend that if they suspect the food is the problem, they should take a freezer bag full of it — along with the label information that has the products name and lot numbers — to their vet, he told us. If the vet suspects the food is the cause, the vet should then contact the company and FDA. If theres a problem, we need to document it and get supporting lab results.

Owners anxious

The arguments back and forth don't mean much to anxious pet owners, who say its about time some federal agency investigated NUTRO and its products.

After so many complaints, how can this dog food still be on the market for consumers to purchase and feed to their dogs? Andrea G. of Sicklerville, New Jersey asked us. I have been feeding my Dachshund NUTRO Ultra dry dog food for many months. Suddenly, 10 days ago, he started vomiting yellow bile 1- 2 times daily.

It makes me sick to think that I might be the one responsible for my dog's vomiting by feeding him this food. I can only hope that something is done, very soon, to prevent other pets from becoming ill.

Read verbatim complaints and comments from consumers.

Feds Deny NUTRO Investigation; Witnesses Say Otherwise...

Article Image

NUTRO Bites Back; Denies Probe of Pet Deaths, Illnesses

NUTRO Products Inc. denies it's under investigation by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) — even though an official of that agency told ConsumerAffairs.com on Monday that the pet food maker is the focus of a probe.

An FDA official who spoke on the condition of anonymity confirmed that ongoing investigation is the reason the FDAs Division of Freedom of Information denied a ConsumerAffairs.com request for a list of complaints and lab results the agency has collected about NUTRO pet food. The FDA did not elaborate on the focus of its investigation, saying only that it could be criminal or civil in nature.

Hundreds of pet owners nationwide have told ConsumerAffairs.com their dogs and cats have experienced sudden and recurring bouts of vomiting, diarrhea and other gastrointestinal problems after eating various flavors of NUTRO. In many cases, the animals recovered after their owners switched them to another brand of pet food. Others died.

NUTRO has repeatedly defended its products, saying they are 100 percent safe, and also denies that it is being investigated.

We've been in contact with officials from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regarding your April 20th posting that claims there is an ongoing FDA investigation into NUTRO pet food, spokeswoman Monica Barrett wrote in an e-mail Tuesday night. This is not true. We have confirmed with officials of the FDA division responsible for regulating pet food, the Center for Veterinary Medicine (CVM), that there is no current or ongoing investigation of Nutro Products, Inc.

The FDA had not previously commented on complaints regarding NUTRO pet food. News of its investigation came to light only after the agency denied a request filed by ConsumerAffairs.com under the Freedom of Information Act for a list of all complaints and lab results the FDA has collected since 2007 about NUTRO.

The FDA said the release of those records could interfere with law enforcement proceedings.

The document (s) constitute record (s) complied for law enforcement purposes, the disclosure of which could reasonably be expected to interfere with law enforcement proceedings, the FDAs George A. Strait Jr. wrote in a letter denying the FOIA request.

In a follow-up telephone call, an agency official confirmed that the request was denied because of an ongoing investigation. The official requested anonymity because he or she was not authorized to speak publicly about the investigation.

Menu investigation

Another pet food company, Menu Foods, said in a recent financial filing that the FDA had commenced a criminal investigation to determine whether Menu violated the Food, Drug, & Cosmetic Act. The company noted that additional actions or investigations may arise in the future. It did not mention any other pet food companies. Menu last year settled a $24 million lawsuit that grew from the largest pet food recall in U.S. history.

NUTRO is a division of privately-held Mars, Inc., which is not required to file the extensive financial disclosure statements required of publicly-traded companies. After NUTRO was acquired by Mars in 2007, Mars was fined a record 4.5 million (about US$5.8 million) by the German Federal Cartel Office (FCO) for not observing the required waiting period before closing the transaction.

Mars had been by far the leading provider of cat and dog food in Germany prior to the merger. NUTRO also had extensive marketing operations in Europe, but under pressure from the German regulators, Mars divested NUTRO's Austrian and German businesses.

Worrisome trend

ConsumerAffairs.com filed its Freedom of Information request for NUTRO records last year after an analysis of consumer complaints revealed that scores of pets from California to South Carolina had experienced sudden and recurring bouts of diarrhea, vomiting, and other digestive problems.

A common denominator among those dogs and cats was NUTRO pet food. In many cases, consumers said their pets conditions improved once their owners stopped feeding them NUTRO pet food. Some animals died, however.

ConsumerAffairs.com continues to receive complaints about NUTRO from dog and cat owners nationwide. In the past year, consumers have filed more than 600 complaints saying their dogs or cats suddenly became ill after eat NUTRO. The problems these pets have experienced are similar: vomiting, diarrhea, and other digestive issues.

Most of the complaints mirror one received last week from Linda P. of New Baltimore, Michigan.

For three years, I have been feeding my dog NUTRO Natural Choice Lamb Meal & Rice Formula Small Bites Dry Dog Food, she said. The last bag I bought, I notice the food color was lighter than in the past. Me being who I am, I believed there was a changed in formula for the better. My Dachshund/Lab became ill, vomiting food chunks and yellow bile as well. We took him to the vet and I have been feeding him homemade chicken and rice and antibiotics and he is on the mend.

She adds: How can so many dogs get sick and nothing be done? Today I will start mixing his homemade food with a different brand of dry food. I never want anyone else to go through, what appears to be many, the same situation as our dogs. It will be a week or two before Im sure my dog is okay.

NUTRO denies it

NUTRO defends its products and insists its food is safe. Many NUTRO customers also tout the food, saying their pets have had no problems. And veterinarians say several factors can cause gastrointestinal problems in dogs and cats, including changes in diet, newly developed sensitivities to pet foods, and viral infections.

But pet owners who complain to ConsumerAffairs.com on a nearly daily basis are convinced something is wrong with NUTROs food. And they say its no coincidence that so many dogs and cats have become sick — with the same symptoms — after eating various flavors of that pet food.

NUTRO makes dogs sick, says Erin of Encino, California. It is a fact and Im outraged that nobody is taking it off the shelf.

Erin says her three-year-old Puggle was a healthy active dog until she started eating NUTRO Natural Choice Lamb Meal & Rice Formula and NUTRO Max Beef & Rice Dinner Chunks in Gravy: After about two weeks of this food, she became sick. (She was) constipated for a few days, then had diarrhea, and finally vomiting and was always extremely thirsty. The last straw was her laying lethargic on the couch with white gums.

Thats when Erin rushed her dog to the vet.

The vet said she had allergies, prescribed an antibiotic and cortisone and gave me a bag of Science Diet. I feed her the Science Diet in place of NUTRO because it was free, and she was fine within a week.

Erin, however, says she made the mistake of switching her dog back to NUTRO after the Science Diet was gone.

She again had constipation, followed by horrible diarrhea, and finally vomiting yellow bile and white gums, Erin told us. There is no way that all these stories are just coincidences (not) if my dog is fine when she isnt eating NUTRO and when she is eating it, shes horribly sick. I have switched her back to Science Diet and all her symptoms are gone and her appetite has returned to normal.

Another California pet owner says her dog also became ill after eating NUTRO pet food.

My husband and I purchased NUTRO chicken and rice small bites for our two Chihuahuas, says Jessica of Larkspur. After about five days, our six-year-old male Chihuahua became lethargic, groaned a lot, developed a fever, was not excited to go on walks, and lost excitement for anything that used to bring him joy.

My husband began to suspect it was the new food as he had only developed these symptoms after eating NUTRO. He has always been a healthy and active Chihuahua.

The couple took the dog to their vet, who ran tests but couldnt pinpoint the problem. He was given antibiotics and we are crossing our fingers they work. Our Chihuahua can barely walk, he is groaning in pain, and is extremely depressed.

Across the country, a longtime NUTRO pet owner in Pennsylvania told us her dog suddenly became ill after eating the food.

I had been feeding my dog NUTRO for years, says Amy D. of Webster, Pennsylvania. I started feeding her NUTRO for sensitive stomachs about 6 months ago. At first everything seemed fine. Then my dog, who never urinated in my house, started having accidents (frequently). She needed to go out constantly and would squat repeatedly, come in, and ask to go right back out. I took her to the vet and began treatment for bladder infection. Upon finishing treatment it started all over again.

Amys vet discovered crystals in the dogs urine, which also had a high PH balance. The vet put the dog on another medication.

In the meantime other than the restless pacing to go outside, she seemed disinterested and lethargic, Amy says. Then she began having extremely loose bowel movements (an awful bright yellow) in the house.

Amy launched her own investigation and discovered the scores of complaints about NUTRO on ConsumerAffairs.com.

I couldn't believe my eyes. Could it really be the dog food I had trusted so much making my beloved pet ill? I immediately threw away all my NUTRO dog food.

Amy is now feeding her dog another brand of pet food. And Im thrilled to say she is her old self again. She no longer has to take any medicines and has no more accidents or uncontrollable urges. Thanks to this Web site and everyone who took the time to file a complaint, I have my healthy happy dog back.

Not a fluke?

A pet owner in New York said his puppy had the same experience as Amys dog after eating NUTRO. And hes convinced its not a fluke.

We got our dog two weeks ago and our puppy was healthy when we got her, says Manny of Fresh Meadows, New York. She started eating NUTRO Natural Choice for puppies, since it was recommended by a friend of ours. A week later, she started squatting to urinate, but only small drops or none at all came out. When she can urinate, it is frequent, in small amounts, and contains blood.

Manny took his puppy to the vet, who prescribed amoxicillin.

She received a sonogram, culture test, and urinalysis test. The results showed that she may have a stone in her bladder. The blood in her urine is caused by the stone scraping the bladder walls. The urinalysis test showed that she had a high PH balance. I don't think it is a coincidence that I have the same exact problem as Amy, adds Manny. I wonder if something is wrong NUTRO pet food again. Our puppy is still sick.

ConsumerAffairs.com's investigation into the complaints weve received about NUTRO pet food has also revealed:

• Six dogs unexpectedly died — or were euthanized — in 2008 after eating NUTRO pet food. Those dogs include two Italian Greyhounds in Indiana, a Beagle/Whippet mix in Pennsylvania, two German Shepherd puppies in North Carolina, and a Doberman Pinscher in Texas;

• The FDA investigated the April 2008 deaths of two Italian Greyhounds dogs in Indiana. The FDA tested samples of the NUTRO food those dogs ate, but did not find any toxins. An autopsy indicated the dogs died from antifreeze poisoning. The dogs owner doesnt believe those results, saying there is no antifreeze around her home. No one has tested the NUTRO food the other dogs ate before they died;

• Two Italian Greyhounds at a military base in Italy became sick after eating NUTRO food. The dogs owner told us she hopes the FDA is investigating NUTRO and urged the agency to move quickly. It is hard to tell how many people at overseas military bases are feeding this (food) to their dogs and possibly killing them, says Michelle M. who bought her dogs NUTRO food at the bases commissary.

• A pet nutrition specialist for NUTRO told us shes heard complaints about the companys food making dogs and cats sick. She reported those concerns to her supervisor, but said they were ignored. She later resigned.

Some pet owners, however, say NUTRO is the only brand of food their dogs and cats can eat.

My Shar-peis are the most sensitive dogs I have ever owned, says Allison R. of Nampa, Indiana. On the wrong food their hair falls out, their eyes weep and their ears get nasty. It takes me a good 3 months of only NUTRO dog food in order to reverse the affects of the other food. I have found that the senior diet is what works best, not sure why, but it seems to keep my Shar-Peis looking healthy.

A Tennessee pet owner also defends NUTRO pet food — and warns consumers not to jump to conclusions based on Internet complaints.

I feed all of my dogs and cats Nutro products and they are just as healthy as they have ever been, says Brenda of Springfield, Tennessee. They have healthy shiny coats and their stools are firm.

Gradual transition

Brenda also had some advice to pet owners switching brands of food.

Do a gradual transition from the old food, she said. If you dont, your dog will likely experience these issues. Not every bout of diarrhea, constipation, bladder infection, liver and kidney failure and loss of excitement to go on walks should be attributed to food. Your first responsibility as a pet owner should be to take your dog to the vet before you blame anyone. Do your research and don't let any Web site diagnose your pet.

NUTRO has repeatedly insisted its food is 100 percent safe and meets all standards set by FDA, the U.S Department of Agriculture (USDA) and the Association of American Feed Control Officials (AAFCO). A spokeswoman said all NUTRO products are tested for melamine, molds, toxins and other bacteria. And she called the complaints weve received isolated reports of inaccurate information posted online.

The company, however, set up a special a section on its Web site in response to the issues and concerns raised in the ConsumerAffairs.com stories. NUTRO said it takes all customer complaints seriously and encouraged pet owners with concerns about the food to contact the company at 1-800-833-5330.

Veterinarians have said its not uncommon for pets to have sudden bouts of vomiting, diarrhea, and other gastrointestinal problems. They also said a number of factors — pet food, stress, or a viral infection — could be the culprit.

Dr. Steven Hansen, a veterinary toxicologist with the American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (ASPCA), reviewed some of the NUTRO complaints, in an effort to find out why so many pets have become sick — or even died — after eating NUTRO food.

Unfortunately the cases are not consistent and appear to be anecdotal with no real definitive diagnostic findings, Dr. Hansen said. Without any consistent trends in findings we can not do anything any further. This does appear to us to be a situation where bad things happen, but they are not likely food-related.

Hansen, however, said consumers who suspect NUTROs food is a factor in their pets illnesses should have their animals examined by a veterinarian and document the problems.

I would also recommend that if they suspect the food is the problem, they should take a freezer bag full of it — along with the label information that has the products name and lot numbers — to their vet, he told us. If the vet suspects the food is the cause, the vet should then contact the company and FDA. If theres a problem, we need to document it and get supporting lab results.

Owners anxious

The arguments back and forth don't mean much to anxious pet owners, who say its about time some federal agency investigated NUTRO and its products.

After so many complaints, how can this dog food still be on the market for consumers to purchase and feed to their dogs? Andrea G. of Sicklerville, New Jersey asked us. I have been feeding my Dachshund NUTRO Ultra dry dog food for many months. Suddenly, 10 days ago, he started vomiting yellow bile 1- 2 times daily.

It makes me sick to think that I might be the one responsible for my dog's vomiting by feeding him this food. I can only hope that something is done, very soon, to prevent other pets from becoming ill.

Read verbatim complaints and comments from consumers.

NUTRO Bites Back; Denies Probe of Pet Deaths, Illnesses...

Lawsuits On the Trail of Nutro, Canidae Pet Foods


Two separate law firms are gathering information for potential class action lawsuits against Canidae and Nutro, the pet food manufacturers whose products are alleged to have caused widespread pet illness.

Progressive Law Group, LLC, is currently gathering information from pet owners who say their dogs became sick as a result of eating Canidae products, or who have information that would be useful to the suit.

According to its website, the firm focuses mainly on environmental, energy, and consumer affairs issues. More information about the Canidae suit can be found online.

Meanwhile, the Alabama firm of McCallum, Hoaglund, Cook, and Irby is gathering information for a potential class action lawsuit against the company that manufactures Nutro.

In spite of widespread complaints of pet illness, Canidae has yet to issue a voluntary recall of its foods. Last year, the company issued a statement explaining that it had changed the foods formulation and that pets needed to be transitioned gradually from the old to the new formula.

Specifically, the company cited the new foods increased levels of meat protein and the increased overall complex carbohydrate quality.

However, angry consumers said Canidae was at best inconsistent in warning pet owners beforehand of the need for the gradual formula transition. Many claimed that neither the food nor the shelves on which it was stocked provided any warning that the formula had changed.

Some consumers have speculated that the new formula, which contains carbohydrates such as corn and barley, came as a shock to their dogs systems, which had become accustomed to the old formulas more rice-centered composition. In September 2007, a lab report allegedly showed that a Canidae sample contained the painkiller acetaminophen, a charge which Canidae vehemently denied.

Menu Foods

Menu Foods, another large pet food manufacturer, was forced to issue a series of recalls in 2007, after scores of dogs became sick, some experiencing kidney failure. At least 10 deaths were reported. The Pet Food Products Safety Alliance (PFPSA) tested a batch of Nutro pet food in August 2008, and found alarming levels of copper and zinc.

Indeed, PFPSA noted that the copper levels were two to three times higher than recommended by the Association of American Feed Control Officials (AAFCO).

A multi-district class action lawsuit against Menu Foods recently settled for $24 million. The suit was brought on behalf of certain U.S. and Canadian residents who purchased recalled pet food after March 16, 2007.

Under the settlement, all class members are eligible to collect up to 100% of economic damages they suffered, as long as they can provide documentation. An explanation of the settlement and relevant court documents can be found at www.petfoodsettlement.com.

More about pets ...



Lawsuits On the Trail of Nutro, Canidae Pet Foods...

Pricey Pet Food Not Necessarily Better

When it comes to buying pet food, higher cost doesn't always mean higher quality. A higher price could indicate better ingredients and better quality control during and after manufacturing, but it could also just mean prettier packaging, more marketing, or a fancy name.

And despite food safety concerns that resulted from a recall of pet food tainted with melamine in 2007, Consumer Reports urges caution for consumers who are considering making their own pet food, a growing trend.

Consumer Reports asked eight experts in dog and cat nutrition at seven top veterinary schools what consumers get by spending more for pet food. They were also asked what they served their own pets: Most of the experts said they use a variety of common brands sold at pet stores or supermarkets.

A recent survey by the Associated Press found that although Americans may be spending less on themselves, they're not scrimping on their pets. According to the survey, just one in seven pet owners said they had curtailed spending on their pet during the past year, even as they cut back on other expenses.

Thirty-seven percent of U.S. households have dogs, and 32 percent have cats. But because of multi-cat households, felines outnumber canines. As of 2007, there were almost 82 million cats and 72 million dogs.

The bottom line: It's more important to look for the overall nutrient profile of a particular pet food brand than it is to shop by price or even individual ingredients. "As a pet owner, your main goal is to ensure that your animal is active and healthy," says Jamie Hirsh, associate health editor at Consumer Reports. "That suggests that the food you're buying is doing its job. But it's also important to know that you don't have to choose the most expensive food to get what's best for your pet. Look for food labeled 'complete and balanced,' which indicates it can be the pet's sole nourishment."

Hirsh advises pet owners to look for labels stating that the food's nutritional adequacy was validated by animal-feeding tests based on protocols from the American Association of Feed Control Officials, a regulatory group. That statement is a step above the other one that AAFCO allows — that a food was formulated to meet the group's nutrient profiles. "In addition, make sure the package has contact information for the food's manufacturer, in case you have questions," Hirsh says.

Consumers should also take into consideration the age of their pet and whether he or she has special needs. For example, cats with kidney or urinary problems might benefit from the moisture in wet food, while animals with dental issues might do better with dry food.

What pet food labels really mean

For pet food, there's no official definition of organic, human-grade, premium, no fillers, or gourmet. Gluten-free foods are generally necessary only for the tiny percentages of pets that are intolerant of that protein. There's some evidence that antioxidants — such as vitamin E — and some omega-3 fatty acids might enhance pets' immunity or help protect against certain diseases, but the experts interviewed by Consumer Reports were split on whether consumers need to look for them.

Consumer Reports recommends that consumers educate themselves about pet food labeling, which is mostly defined by AAFCO, which sets standards for pet food manufacturing. Here are some examples:

• The 95 percent rule (Beef for Dogs). Named ingredient(s) must account for a least 95 percent of the product by weight.

• Dinner; also Entre, Formula, Nuggets, Platter, Recipe (Chicken and Salmon Dinner for Cats). The named ingredients must make up at least 25 percent of the product by weight, not counting water. Each individual food must make up at least 3 percent.

• "With..." (Gourmet Fillets with Turkey for Dogs). Contains 3 percent or more of the named ingredient.

• Flavor (Beef flavor). No specific percentage required, but the product must contain enough of the food to impart the claimed flavor, or another substance that tastes like it (beef stock, for example).

• Guaranteed analysis. Mandatory guarantee that the food contains the labeled percentages of crude protein, fat, fiber, and moisture.

• Light, lite, low-calorie. Meets AAFCO limits for a reduced-calorie diet for overweight dogs and cats. "Lean" and "low-fat" have a similar meaning for fat.

• Natural. Technically, the food has few or no synthetic ingredients. But the claim is loosely defined.

• Grain-free. Protein in the product comes from nongrain sources (perhaps for people who want pets to eat more animal protein). It's unclear whether there's any benefit to a diet high in animal protein.

What consumers can do

Consumer Reportsoffers this advice to pet owners:

Be careful when making your own pet food. Most experts said they hadn't seen a pet get sick from inexpensive food; however, half said they had seen pets become ill from eating homemade pet food, a growing trend since the 2007 recall of some commercial pet food contaminated by melamine. Dogs and cats each require about 40 different nutrients in very specific proportions, so pet owners who insist on making their own pet food should consider enlisting a nutritionist certified by the American College of Veterinary Nutrition (www.acvn.org) or get help from the Web sites www.balanceit.com or www.petdiets.com.

Consider your pet's age. Age-specific food is very important for puppies, kittens, and pregnant pets, who have especially stringent nutritional needs. Foods labeled either "for growth" or "for all life stages" meet those needs. Foods "for maintenance" are for healthy adult animals only. "Senior" is a marketing term, not a nutritional term.

Weigh the costs and benefits of wet versus dry food. There's no nutritional difference between wet and dry pet food, but there is a cost difference. Wet foods contain about 75 percent water, so pets need more to get the same calories, and that makes wet food more expensive per serving.

The full report is available in the March 2009 issue of Consumer Reports and online at www.ConsumerReportsHealth.org.

Pricey Pet Food Not Necessarily Better...

Topaz Wafer Rolls Recalled on Melamine Fears

Melamine contamination continues to trigger recalls of food products. In the latest melamine scare, National Brands Inc. has recalled all its 4.76-ounce and 12.3-ounce cans of Topaz Wafer Rolls.

The wafer rolls involved in this action were sold in four flavors and distributed at retail stores nationwide. The Spring Valley, New York, company said it has not received any reports of illnesses linked to the products. Customers with questions about this action can call the company at 866-238-5201.

This is the second melamine-contamination issue the company has faced in recent weeks.

In late November, the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection warned consumers not to eat National Brand's Topaz Wafer Rolls with Hazlenut Chocolate-Flavored Cream Filling because of melamine contamination.

A sample of those products — tested by the Connecticut Agriculture Experiment Station Laboratory — revealed the wafer contained 5 parts per million (ppm) of melamine and the cream filling had more than 7 ppm.

That is well above the 2.5 ppm standard for melamine set by the Food and Drug Administration,

The Chinese-made wafers were sold at Ocean State Job Lot stores in Connecticut and identified as Lot # L821 99D.

Melamine is a chemical used to make plastic and fertilizers. It is not approved for use in human or animal food marketed in the United States — and manufacturers are not allowed to deliberately add it to any food for U.S. consumers.

Concerns about melamine — and its intentional adulteration in imported foods — have repeatedly surfaced in the past year.

In September, Chinese officials discovered melamine in powered infant formula made in that country. Officials learned some dairy plants purposely added the chemical to milk products to make them appear to have higher protein levels.

That contamination is blamed for the deaths of at least six babies in China and the illnesses of thousands of other infants.

Doctors say melamine can cause kidney stones and lead to kidney failure.

China's melamine-tainted milk scandal has since spread from infant formula to dozens of other food products sold around the world, including candy, coffee, and pretzels.

Melamine is also blamed for the deaths and illnesses of thousands of dogs and cats in the United States in 2007.

FDA officials discovered the chemical in imported wheat gluten from China used to make dog and cat food. Those findings triggered the largest pet food recall in U.S. history.

Although melamine is not supposed to be in animal or human food, the FDA recently concluded that levels below 2.5 parts per million (ppm) do not raise health concerns.

The only exception is infant formula. The FDA now says melamine levels of 1 ppm in infant formula are safe. That is a reversal of the zero tolerance policy for melamine the agency adopted in October.

At that time, the FDA said it was "unable to establish any level of melamine and melamine-related compounds in infant formula that does not raise public health concerns."

Topaz Wafer Rolls Recalled on Melamine Fears...

Pet Owners Warned about Chicken Jerky Products


Pet owners continue to complain about illnesses their dogs have experienced after eating chicken jerky products imported from China, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) warned on Friday.

That's why FDA officials again cautioned consumers to be wary of feeding their dogs these products, which include chicken tenders, strips, or treats.

This warning comes less than two weeks after an Australian company recalled some of its Chinese-made chicken strips because the treats may cause illnesses in small dogs.

And those illnesses sound similar to the ones dogs and cats have experienced after eating Nutro food, according to a regular ConsumerAffairs.com reader.

15 cases

Earlier this month, The KraMar Pet Company of Australia said it had received 15 reported cases of illnesses since it launched its Supa Naturals chicken breast strips 15 months ago. Those cases triggered the company's recall.

KraMar acknowledged a possible linked between the treats and instances of Fanconi-Like Syndrome in small dogs. Symptoms of that illness include:

• Decreased food consumption, although some may continue to consume the treats to the exclusion of other foods
• Decreased activity or lethargy
• Vomiting
• Diarrhea, sometimes with blood
• Increased water consumption and/or increased urination

In severe cases, blood tests may indicate kidney failure and glucose in the urine may indicate Fanconi-Like Syndrome, the company said.

A veterinarian at the University of Sydney is now investigating the recent illnesses in the dogs that ate the chicken treats, Australian news organizations have reported. KraMar officials, however, say there is no scientific evidence linking its chicken strips to Fanconi-Like Syndrome.

The company's recall came a little more than a year after the FDA warned pet owners to be leery of feeding their dogs chicken jerky products.

"There is a potential association between illness in dogs and these products," the FDA warned last September. "(The) FDA has received over 70 complaints involving more than 95 dogs experiencing illness that their owners associated with eating chicken jerky products."

On Friday, the FDA echoed that warning and said it continues to receive complaints about chicken jerky products.

Limit consumption

"FDA believes the continued trend of consumer complaints, coupled with the information obtained from Australia, warrants an additional reminder and animal health notification," the agency said in a written statement. "Chicken jerky products should not be substituted for a balanced diet and are intended to be used occasionally and in small quantities. Owners of small dogs must be especially careful to limit the amount of these products."

The FDA said it is working with several veterinary diagnostic laboratories to see if there is a link between the products and illnesses in dogs.

"To date, scientists have not been able to determine a definitive cause for the reported illnesses," the FDA said. "FDA has conducted extensive chemical and microbial testing, but has not identified any contaminant."

The FDA said consumers who feed their dogs chicken jerky products should watch for such symptoms as decreased appetite — although some dogs may continue to eat the treats instead of other foods — lethargy, vomiting, diarrhea, sometimes with blood, and increased water consumption and/ or urination.

Pet owners who notice any of these symptoms should immediately stop feeding their dogs the chicken jerky products. They should also contact their veterinarians if the problems are severe or persist for more than 24 hours, the FDA said.

"Blood tests may indicate kidney failure (increased urea nitrogen and creatinine)," the FDA said. "Urine tests may indicate Fanconi syndrome (increased glucose). Although most dogs appear to recover, some reports to the FDA have involved dogs that have died."

The FDA said it would continue to "actively investigate" this problem.

The agency encouraged pet owners and veterinarians to report any illnesses possibly linked to these products — or any pet foods — to the the agency's Consumer Complaint Coordinator in their state.

Sounds familiar

Meanwhile, a regular ConsumerAffairs.com reader noticed the illnesses among the dogs that have eaten the chicken jerky products sounded eerily familiar.

"I can't help but wonder if this is related to the dogs in the US with these types of symptoms (unrelated to the Menu Foods incident)," Carol V. of Rhode Island told us when KraMar recalled the chicken treats.

She was referring to the growing number of dogs and cats that have experienced similar digestive problems after eating Nutro pet food.

Some pet owners, like Ashley H. of Manteca, California, told us their dogs even died after eating that brand of food.

"Our chocolate lab, Lucy, has been eating Nutro food since she was a puppy," Ashley said. "About two months ago, we switched her to Nutro large breed Weight Management because she started getting too heavy. On December 14 she had loose stools and was throwing up. She was very lethargic and wouldn't eat. The next day she seemed to be getting better and started eating, so we canceled the appointment with the vet."

Three days later, Lucy's health took a turn for the worse.

"We took her to the vet to find that she had something wrong with her liver," Ashley said. "We had an appointment for December 18th to have the excess fluid removed and see what else needed to be done. She didn't make it through the night."

Nutro has repeatedly defended its products, saying its food is 100 percent safe and meets standards set by the FDA, the United States Department of Agriculture, and the Association of American Feed Control Officials.

More about pets ...



Pet Owners Warned about Chicken Jerky Products...

Mars Extends Pet Food Recall


Mars Petcare US is extending a recall of dry pet food after the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) reported finding Salmonella in additional samples of the company's SPECIAL KITTY Gourmet Blend cat food.

The earlier recall, issued October 27, was for cat food produced at Mars' Allenton, Pa., plant on August 11, 2008. The recall is now being extended to cover all dry pet food produced at the plant with a "best by" date between August 11, 2009 and October 3, 2009.

The recall affects only products sold at BJ's Wholesale Club, ShopRite Supermarkets, and Wal-Mart locations in Connecticut, Delaware, Massachusetts, Maryland, Maine, North Carolina, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Virginia, Vermont, and West Virginia. No other customers and no other states are affected.

Retailers have been notified of the recall and asked to remove the products from their shelves. The recalled pet food should not be fed to pets and should be handled carefully by consumers. Consumers should wear disposable gloves and wash their hands carefully when handling any food product thought to carry Salmonella.

Mars makes a variety of pet foods, including Nutro dog food, which has been the target of hundreds of complaints from angry pet ownes who have written to ConsumerAffairs.com.

Eric of Lowell, Mass., said his dog became ill when he switched to Nutro.

"We rushed him to the vet who initially thought it might be leptospirosis, but those tests came back negative," Eric said. "After four days at the vet, with IV's, a negative Lepto test, and multiple medications, he was sent home and seems to be doing much better."

"Bottom line? He became sick after eating Nutro. He got better after stopping eating Nutro," Eric said.

Salmonella

Salmonella can cause serious infections in dogs and cats, experts say. People can also be infected if they handle the tainted food. Children, the elderly, and those with compromised immune systems are especially vulnerable.

Symptoms of Salmonella infection in humans include nausea, vomiting, diarrhea or bloody diarrhea, abdominal cramping and fever. Salmonella can, in rare cases, cause such serious illnesses as arterial infections, arthritis, muscle pain, and urinary tract symptoms.

Pets infected with Salmonella may be lethargic and have diarrhea or bloody diarrhea, fever, and vomiting. Some pets, however, may only have decreased appetite, fever and abdominal pain.

Pet owners whose cats ate the recalled food and have these symptoms should contact their veterinarian.

Mars said it was trying to get ahead of the problem.

"We are continuously monitoring and updating our processes to be at the forefront of product quality, innovation, customer responsiveness, and manufacturing efficiency. In recent months, we have invested tens of millions of dollars in plant upgrades, new testing protocols, advanced associate training, and a new state of the art testing facility that will open in mid-2009," the company said in a statement.

For more information about the recall, pet owners can contact the company at 1-877-568-4463.

More about pets ...



Mars Extends Pet Food Recall...

FDA Finds Melamine in U.S. Infant Formula



Melamine -- the chemical blamed for the deaths of four infants in China and countless pets in the United States -- has been found in infant formula, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) said, according to The Wall Street Journal.

The newspaper quoted FDA official Stephen Sundlof as saying the finding is "no cause for concern." He said the chemical was at very low levels and was probably the result of contact with melamine during processing or packaging. Sundlof said the agency also found minute amounts of melamine in products such as nutritional and medical supplements made by five U.S. manufacturers of infant formula.

Melamine is a chemical used to make plastic and fertilizers. It is not allowed in human or pet food, although in the late 1960s or early 1970s, the FDA approved melamine as a "food contact substance," Sundlof said.

Sundlof said the discovery was part of a testing program that went into high gear after melamine in Chinese infant formula sickened tens of thousands of Chinese infants and killed four. Samples tested by FDA came not only from ethnic markets but also from products produced by the five major U.S. infant formula manufacturers.

Animal tests are now being conducted to determine melamine safety levels, he said.

Imports detained

Earlier this month, the FDA announced that it was detaining scores of products imported from China, including some pet food, because of possible melamine contamination.

Under this action, dozens of Chinese-imported items that contain milk products will be held at the border -- and not allowed to enter the U.S. -- until the importers can prove the items are not tainted with melamine or are not made with milk or milk-derived ingredients.

The products listed in the import alert -- a precautionary measure designed to keep food tainted with melamine from entering the country -- include candy, cereals, snack foods, cheese, ice cream, soft drinks and baby food products.

"We've continued to get information from others in the international community, and reports from China, about (melamine contamination) moving into different commodities," Steve Solomon, a senior FDA enforcement official, told The Associated Press. "Most of the products we are talking about are finished products like cookies, cakes and candies. The impact will be for various ethnic communities looking for specific products."

"The (infants') illnesses involved the formation of kidney stones and crystals and related complications," the FDA wrote in the import alert. It added that some 13,000 infants were hospitalized after drinking the tainted formula.

"The milk used in the infant formula has been implicated as the source of the melamine contamination." The FDA learned that melamine was added to the infant formula to increase the nitrogen content and falsely inflate the protein content.

The melamine contamination, however, isn't limited to infant formula.

"FDA analyses have detected melamine and cyanuric acid in a number of products that contain milk or milk-derived ingredients, including candy and beverages," the agency wrote.

And those products were shipped to consumers around the world.

More than 13 countries -- including Asia, Europe and Australia--have discovered melamine in a variety of products made with the tainted milk ingredients from China, the FDA said. Those products include candy, yogurt, frozen desserts, biscuits, instant coffee, milk tea products, and other beverages.

FDA Finds Melamine in U.S. Infant Formula...

Mars Recalls Cat Food Sold at Wal-Mart due to Salmonella


Mars Petcare US has recalled a limited number of bags of its SPECIAL KITTY Gourmet Blend dry cat food sold at Wal-Mart stores in 15 states because of possible Salmonella contamination.

The company said the potentially-tainted cat food was sold at Wal-Mart stores in Connecticut, Delaware, Massachusetts, Maryland, Maine, North Carolina, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Virginia, Vermont, and West Virginia.

"Mars Petcare has been working cooperatively with Wal-Mart to address this issue, and the affected product of this lot has already been removed from Wal-Mart's shelves," the company said in a statement released on Monday. "As a result, consumers can be assured that all SPECIAL KITTY Gourmet Blend products that remain on Wal-Mart's shelves are safe and not subject to this recall."

The cat food involved in the recall include the 3.5 pound, 7 pound, and 18 pound bags with the following UPC codes: 81131 17546, 81131 17547, and 81131 17548. The recalled bags also have a Best if Used By date of August 11, 2009 and a lot code that starts with the numbers "50."

The company said it is not aware of any illnesses in pets or humans linked to the recalled food. Cat owners, however, should immediately stop feeding the food to their pets, the company said.

Salmonella can cause serious infections in dogs and cats, experts say. People can also be infected if they handle the tainted food. Children, the elderly, and those with compromised immune systems are especially vulnerable.

Symptoms of Salmonella infection in humans include nausea, vomiting, diarrhea or bloody diarrhea, abdominal cramping and fever. Salmonella can, in rare cases, cause such serious illnesses as arterial infections, arthritis, muscle pain, and urinary tract symptoms.

Pets infected with Salmonella may be lethargic and have diarrhea or bloody diarrhea, fever, and vomiting. Some pets, however, may only have decreased appetite, fever and abdominal pain.

Pet owners whose cats ate the recalled food and have these symptoms should contact their veterinarian.

For more information about the recall, pet owners can contact the company at 1-877-568-4463.

More about pets ...



Mars Recalls Cat Food Sold at Wal-Mart due to Salmonella...

Pet Owners Eligible For $24 Million in Landmark Melamine Settlement


Pet owners whose dogs or cats became ill or died last year after eating melamine-tainted food are now eligible for a piece of a landmark $24 million settlement. But some pet owners say no amount of money can replace the loss of their best friend.

"She was my constant companion and quite a character," Vicki W. of Sedona, Arizona, said of her cat, which died last year after eating contaminated pet food. "My husband and I miss her greatly."

U.S. District Judge Noel Hillman on Tuesday gave final approval to the settlement, which resolves more than 100 class action lawsuits filed in U.S. and Canadian Courts in the wake of last year's massive pet food recall.

Hillman called the settlement "fair, reasonable and adequate," according to the Associated Press.

The $24 million dollar settlement is in addition to the $8 million in claims some companies involved in the litigation have already paid--bringing the total to $32 million.

Under the deal, pet owners can seek compensation for such expenses as veterinary bills, burial costs, time missed from work to take care of sick animals, and property damage caused by sick pets.

In some cases, the settlement allows consumers to recover up to 100% of "reasonable economic damages" if they can provide documentation for those losses. Even consumers who do not have any documentation can recover up to $900 per pet under the settlement.

Lawyers said more than 10,000 pet owners in the United States and Canada had filed claims as of September 30, 2008. The average cost of the claims analyzed so far is approximately $1,500, attorneys said.

More than 100 people kept their rights to sue the pet food companies and other parties separately.

And 28 people filed objections to the settlement, saying it didn't cover the pain and suffering they endured from losing their pets. They questioned how anyone could put a price tag on the loss of a beloved pet. They're pet owners like Vicki of Arizona.

"She can never be replaced because of her unique personality," Vicki said of her Abyssinian.

That healthy cat suddenly became sick in early 2007 months before Menu Foods of Canada recalled more than 60 million containers of melamine tainted food. "So I had the vet do blood work on her," Vicki said. "The vet said she had beginning kidney disease and if we changed her food she would be okay for a long time."

Her cat's condition, however, deteriorated.

"I took her back in a month and she had gotten much worse," Vicki said. "The vet was surprised at how fast she had gone down and recommended IV treatment. We gave her IV's at home every day for four months and she died anyway."

At that time, no one knew about the tainted pet food.

"I had an autopsy done on her because the vet was puzzled about why my cat went down hill so fast," Vicki said, adding her cat's medical bill totaled more than $1,000. "When we heard about the food problem, the vet said the autopsy made sense--she definitely was victim of (tainted) cat food."

Does Tuesday's settlement give Vicki any sense of justice? "Nine-hundred dollars is a small price for the vet bills and the months trying to save her," she told us. "The only consultation is that it hopefully won't happen again."

The settlement may also help other animals in need.

It stipulates that any money left after all the plaintiffs are paid--including the 55 law firms involved in the case-- will be donated to various animal charities. One attorney said the lead firms alone had done more than $5 million worth of work.

Consumers with questions about the settlement--or filing a claim--can find answers on the Pet Food Products Liability Settlement Web site.

As we've reported, this case started last March when Menu Foods recalled millions of containers of dog and cat food tainted with melamine, a chemical used to make plastics. That marked the largest pet food recall in U.S. history.

Thousands of dogs and cats across North America suffered kidney disease or died after eating the contaminated food.

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) traced the source of that contamination to the wheat gluten imported from China.

Sherrie Savett, a lead attorney for the plaintiffs in the case estimated more than 1,500 died in the U.S. died last year after eating the tainted food. ConsumerAffairs.Com tried to reach her on Tuesday to discuss the settlement, but she did not return calls.

But in May, Savett said the settlement was a win for pet owners.

"With this settlement, consumers will get as much or more than if they litigated the cases individually," she said. "The claims process allows people to recover as much as 100 percent of all their economic damages.

"What we did get out of this settlement for consumers is the possibility of complete recovery of all economic damages--even for lost carpets and time--in addition to their veterinary bills," she added. "Even in cases where people do not have documentation of their damages, the settlement allows in some cases up to $900 for each person."

Some pet owners, however, have criticized the settlement. Don Earl, whose cat Chuckles died after eating Menu Foods' Pet Pride food, has called the settlement "a slap in the face."

"Extrapolating from the best information available, over a quarter million pets were killed by the poisoned pet food epidemic," he said. "Take a third off the top for the attorneys, and divide by the number of pet owners harmed, they each will get $64."

Another pet owner, whose 13-year-old Sheltie suddenly died after eating some of the tainted pet food, agreed.

"I feel that the $24 million is less than a slap on the wrist," said Jerry L. of Goodyear, Arizona. "It's a sad state of affairs and just goes to prove that until pet owners who really care about their pets push their government for stronger laws, these companies will continue to hold our pets at little or no regard.

Canadian author Ann Martin, who has researched the pet food industry for years, has called on pet food makers and the government to ensure the food consumers' feed their animals is safe.

But she is not convinced that's happened.

"I really don't think the food on the shelves now is any safer than what we saw prior to the massive recall," Martin told us in May. "How many of these pet food companies are testing for contamination in the raw materials they are purchasing? It is my understanding that some are now testing for melamine in the grains, but this is just one toxin that might be in the raw material. Are they testing the vitamin/mineral premixes, many which are coming from China or other countries with questionable practices?"

The settlement requires pet food makers to continue testing ingredients imported from China. That, however, doesn't make Martin feel any safer about feeding her animals commercial pet food.

"I'll continue to feed my pets a homemade diet," she said. "At least I know what they are eating, which is more than you can say with many of the pet foods on the market."

Pet owners like Don Earl said some good has come from the massive recall.

"Many pet owners (including myself) have switched from the recycled garbage promoted as pet food to homemade," he said. "Their pets will live much longer and healthier lives."

Dozens of lawsuits

Pet owners in 19 states and Ontario, Canada filed dozens of lawsuits against Menu Foods in the weeks that followed the March 16, 2007, nationwide recall of dog and cat food. Those cases were consolidated in a federal court in Camden, New Jersey.

The lawsuits alleged unfair and deceptive trade practices, negligence in failing to provide adequate quality control and breach of implied and express warranties.

Some consumers also claimed they suffered emotional trauma after their pets became sick or died. Pet owners sought compensation for their veterinary bills.

Companies named in the lawsuits -- besides Menu Foods -- included Del Monte Foods Inc. of San Francisco; Nestle of Stamford, Conn.; Procter & Gamble in Cincinnati; Xuzhou Anying Biologic Technology Development Co. Ltd. in Pixian, China; and Suzhou Textile Import and Export Co. in Jiangsu, China.

Those defendants -- and Menu Foods' product liability insurance company -- will cover the costs of the settlement. Menu Foods estimated the recall cost the company $53.8 million.

Pet owners have until November 24, 2008 to file their claims. Those claims should be submitted to:

Claims Administrator P.O. Box 890 Philadelphia, PA 19105-0890 USA

claims@petfoodsettlement.com



Pet Owners Eligible For $24 Million in Landmark Melamine Settlement...

FDA's Melamine Decision Scares Consumers



The Food and Drug Administration's (FDA) recent announcement that some melamine in food products does not pose a health risk is frightening to consumers like Mary W. of Kansas. But the head of a global food testing company applauds the FDA's decision, saying it means the US is now checking for this contaminant.

On Friday, the FDA said that levels of melamine below 2.5 parts per million (ppm) in food does not pose a health risk to humans. The only exception is infant formula.

The FDA said it is "currently unable to establish any level of melamine and melamine-related compounds in infant formula that does not raise public health concerns. There is too much uncertainty to set a level in infant formula and rule out any public health concern."

The agency added, "It is important to understand that this does not mean that any exposure to any detectable level of melamine and melaminerelated compounds in formula will result in harm to infants."

The FDA released these findings--part of its safety and risk assessment of melamine and melamine-related companies in food--in response to the Chinese-milk scandal.

Earlier this month, Chinese officials discovered melamine in powered infant formula made it that country. That contamination is blamed for the recent deaths of four infants in China and the illnesses of 53,000 other children in that country.

Chinese officials learned some dairy plants may have intentionally added melamine to milk products to make them appear to have higher protein levels.

The melamine contamination has since spread from infant formula to dozens of other food products sold around the world, including candy, coffee, and pretzels.

Melamine is a chemical used to make plastic and fertilizers. It is blamed for the illnesses and deaths of thousands of dogs and cats in the United States last year.

Doctors say melamine can cause kidney stones and lead to kidney failure. That's why Kansas consumer Mary W. is outraged by the FDA's decision to allow any levels of melamine in her food.

"I think they (the FDA) have opened a Pandora's Box," she told ConsumerAffairs.com today. "They have basically said they are going to allow the food supply to be contaminated.

"It seems to me that rather than finding a way to make our food supply safer by not allowing any toxin, the FDA has found a way to allow some to come in to the food supply," said Mary, who lives in Baldwin City, Kansas. "That just scares me."

Michael Prinster, chief operation officer of Romer Labs, said he understands Mary's concerns, but he has another view on the FDA's decision.

"I think it's a positive action because it means we (the FDA) are now going to start testing things for melamine. That is a good thing."

"My bigger concern," he added, "is that someone spiked the food products with a known contaminant--and with no regard for the consequences."

Prinster's company runs safety tests for the food, feed, and agriculture industry around the world. The Union, Missouri-based company now has a commercial kit that tests for melamine in milk and milk powder.

Prinster said his company recently tested 124 bags of Chinese-made White Rabbit Creamy candy for that chemical.

"We didn't find anything," he said. "We've tested a lot of other foods---milk or milk-power based foods--off the store shelves and did not found any melamine in them."

But melamine has been found in Chinese-made products that contain milk or power-milk ingredients in the United States and other countries around the world, including the following cases:

• Officials in California and Connecticut confirm they found melamine=-tainted White Rabbit Creamy Candy in their states. The Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection said the tainted candy was primarily found in Asian markets;

• Queensway Foods Company Inc. of California -- a U.S. distributor of White Rabbit Creamy Candy--recalled the products last week because of melamine contamination. The company distributed the candy in California, Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Minnesota, New York, Oregon, Texas, and Washington;

• Singapore's Agri-Food and Veterinary Authority recalled the Chinese-made White Rabbit Creamy Candy after the products tested positive for melamine. It also said other Chinese-made food had tested positive for melamine, including Dutch Lady-brand banana and honeydew flavored milk, Silang-brand potato crackers, and two kinds of puffed rice balls;

• The New Zealand Food Safety Authority said it found high levels of melamine in Chinese-made White Rabbit Creamy Candy;

• The Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA) recently warn consumers not to eat, distribute, or sell White Rabbit candy because of possible melamine contamination;

• Canadian officials also warned consumers not to eat a popular brand of Chinese pretzels, which tested positive for melamine. The tainted products are Kaiser Strawberry Dressing Pretzels and Kaiser Choco Dressing Pretzels. The distributor of the pretzels, Dai Jung, has recalled the products;

• The British maker of the popular Cadbury candy has recalled 11 types of Chinese-made chocolates after the products tested positive for melamine. None of the Cadbury chocolates made in the US were involved in this action. The Hershey Company said it does not buy powered milk or other milk ingredients from China;

• The Taiwanese company that makes Mr. Brown instant coffee and milk tea has recalled seven of its products because of possible melamine contamination.

The FDA said it is not aware of any illnesses in the United States linked to the Chinese-made milk products products. It also said infant formula made in the United States is safe. Those companies are not importing formula or sourcing milk-based materials from China, the agency said.

FDA officials, however, warned consumers not to buy any Chinese-made infant formula. These products are often sold in Asian markets across the country. Meanwhile, the FDA said it will continue to screen imported products for melamine contamination.

"If products are adulterated because they contain melamine and/or a melamine-related compound, the agency will take appropriate actions to prevent the products from entering commerce," the FDA said in a written statement.

But those words offer little comfort to worried consumers like Mary in Kansas.

"I don't trust the FDA," she said, adding she has shared her concerns with her elected officials. "And now I'm struggling day-to-day on what to feed my family. When you go to the grocery story, how do you figure out what to buy?"

Mary has stopped buying any processed food and only eats meat sold by local farmers. She said she will continue to take these precautions until she is sure the food supply is safe.

But the FDA, she fears, can't give her that assurance anytime soon. "The FDA is galloping down a slippery slope."

FDA's Melamine Decision Scares Consumers...

Mars Recalls More Pet Food


Mars Petcare US has recalled all of its dry pet food products manufactured at the company's Everson, Pennsylvania, facility between February 18 and July 29, 2008 because of possible salmonella contamination.

The voluntary recall involves such brands of dog and cat food as Pedigree, Special Kitty, Ol'Roy, and PMI Nutrition Gravy Crunches manufactured at that plant.

This the second time in recent weeks that Mars has recalled some of its products because of possible salmonella contamination.

In August, a salmonella scare forced the company to recall 100 of its 20-pound bags of Pedigree Complete Nutrition Small Crunchy Bites sold at some Albertsons in Southern California and Las Vegas, Nevada.

Mars also manufactures Nutro pet food, which scores of consumers nationwide have blamed for the recent illnesses -- and even deaths -- of their dog and cats.

Nutro products, however, were not included in that recall. They are also not involved in this latest action.

Back in August, Mars said a "component" that tested positive for salmonella was inadvertently shipped to its Tracy, California, plant and used in the production of 100 bags of Pedigree pet food.

In this latest recall, Mars said it has not received any confirmed reports of illnesses caused by the contaminated pet food.

"Even though no direct link between products produced at the Everson manufacturing plant and human or pet illness has been made, we are taking this precautionary action to protect pets and their owners," Catherine Woteki, global director of scientific affairs for Mars, said in a statement issued by the company.

"We are continuing to work collaboratively with the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to determine the nature and source of Salmonella Schwarzengrund at the Everson facility, and are committed to making sure our consumers and customers have the information they need regarding our voluntary recall," she said.

Mars said it stopped production at the Everson facility on July 29, 2008, when it learned of a possible connection between dry pet food produced at the plant and two isolated cases of people infected with salmonella.

Many of the pet food brands involved in the recall are produced at multiple facilities, the company said.

The products involved in this action have the number "17" as the first two digits of the second line.

This chart lists all the pet food involved in this recall:

Product Name / Bag Size

UPC

Product Name / Bag Size

UPC

Country Acres Cat Food40#

16603 02181

Retriever Bites & Bones Dog Food8#

79818 96757

Country Acres Ration Dog Food40#

16603 02333

Retriever Bites & Bones Dog Food20#

79818 96634

Country Acres 18% Dog Food40#

16603 02331

Retriever Bites & Bones Dog Food50#

49394 05666

Country Acres Hi Pro Dog Food50#

16603 02021

Retriever Gravy Blend Dog Food50#

49394 05665

Doggy Bag Dog Food40#

73893 40000

Retriever Gravy Blend Dog Food8#

79818 96756

Members Mark Complete Nutrition Premium Cat Food20#

81131 89881

Retriever Hi Protein Dog Food8#

79818 96755

Members Mark Complete Nutrition Premium Dog Food50#

05388 67055

Retriever Hi Protein Dog Food25#

49394 00002

Members Mark Crunchy Bites & Savory Bones Adult Dog Food50#

05388 67309

Retriever Hi Protein Dog Food50#

49394 00003

Members Mark High Performance Premium Dog Food50#

81131 75479

Retriever Mini Chunk Dog Food8#

79818 96754

Natural Cat Food (Sam's Club)15#

81131 89883

Retriever Mini ChunkDog Food25#

49394 00006

Natural Dog Food(Sam's Club)25#

81131 89884

Retriever Mini ChunkDog Food50#

49395 00005

Ol' Roy Complete Nutrition4.4#

81131 69377

Retriever Puppy Blend Dog Food6#

49394 56221

Ol' Roy Complete Nutrition8#

05388 67144

Retriever Puppy Blend Dog Food8#

79818 96758

Ol' Roy Complete Nutrition 22#

05388 60342

Retriever Puppy Blend Dog Food20#

49394 00004

Ol' Roy Complete Nutrition50#

78742 01022

Retriever Puppy Blend Dog Food40#

79818 96706

Ol' Roy High Performance Nutrition Dog Food20#

05388 60345

Special Kitty Gourmet3.5#

81131 17546

Ol' Roy High Performance Nutrition Dog Food50#

78742 05815

Special Kitty Gourmet4#

78742 53199

Ol' Roy Meaty Chunks 'n Gravy Dog Food8#

81131 69629

Special Kitty Gourmet7#

81131 17547

Ol' Roy Meaty Chunks 'n Gravy Dog Food22#

81131 69630

Special Kitty Gourmet8#

78742 53200

Ol' Roy Meaty Chunks 'n Gravy Dog Food50#

81131 69631

Special Kitty Gourmet18#

81131 15748

Ol' Roy Puppy Complete4#

81131 79078

Special Kitty Gourmet20#

78742 53201

Ol' Roy Puppy Complete8#

81131 79079

Special Kitty Gourmet25#

78742 54314

Ol' Roy Puppy Complete20#

81131 79080

Special Kitty Kitten3.5#

81131 17553

Paws & Claws Delicious Mix Cat Food8#

79818 96632

Special Kitty Kitten4#

78742 53198

Paws & Claws Delicious Mix Cat Food20#

49394 05746

Special Kitty Kitten7#

81131 17554

Paws & Claws Delicious Mix Cat Food40#

79818 96676

Special Kitty Kitten8#

81131 24739

Paws & Claws Premium Choice Cat Food8#

79818 96633

Special Kitty Original3.5#

81131 17557

Paws & Claws Premium Choice Cat Food20#

49394 00008

Special Kitty Original4#

78742 04930

Paws & Claws Premium Choice Cat Food40#

49394 05747

Special Kitty Original7#

81131 17562

Pedigree Large Breed Adult Nutrition20#

23100 29158

Special Kitty Original8#

78742 05744

Pedigree Large Breed Adult Nutrition30.1#

23100 31484

Special Kitty Original18#

81131 17559

Pedigree Large Breed Adult Nutrition36.4#

23100 31479

Special Kitty Original20#

78742 05794

Pedigree Large Breed Adult Nutrition40#

23100 29154

Special Kitty Original25#

81131 68869

Pedigree Small Crunchy Bites Adult Nutrition4.4#

23100 05104

Wegman's Bruiser Complete Nutrition Dog Food4.4#

77890 33654

Pedigree Small Crunchy Bites Adult Nutrition8.8#

23100 05103

Wegman's Bruiser Complete Nutrition Dog Food20#

77890 32988

Pedigree Small Crunchy Bites Adult Nutrition20#

23100 14719

Wegman's Bruiser Complete Nutrition Dog Food37.5#

77890 32994

Pedigree Small Crunchy Bites Adult Nutrition32#

23100 31483

Wegman's Bruiser Puppy Dog Food4.4#

77890 33621

Pedigree Small Crunchy Bites Adult Nutrition40#

23100 31478

Wegman's Bruiser Puppy Dog Food17.6#

77890 32991

Pedigree Small Crunchy Bites Adult Nutrition44#

23100 05100

Wegman's Bruiser Small Crunchy Bites Dog Food4.4#

77890 33618

Pedigree Small Crunchy Bites Adult Nutrition52#

23100 05110

Wegman's Bruiser Small Crunchy Bites Dog Food20#

77890 32982

Pet Pride Indoor Cat3.5#

11110 74584

Wegman's Buju & Ziggie Complete Cat Food3.5#

77890 10005

Pet Pride Indoor Cat18#

11110 74585

Wegman's Buju & Ziggie Complete Cat Food18#

77890 10004

Pet Pride Weight Management Dog Food17.6#

11110 74578

Wegman's Buju & Ziggie Indoor Cat Food3.5#

77890 12038

PMI Nutrition Bites & Bones Dog Food50#

42869 00174

Wegman's Buju & Ziggie Indoor Cat Food18#

77890 12039

PMI Nutrition Canine Advantage50#

42869 00172

Wegman's Buju & Ziggie Kitten3.5#

77890 12036

PMI Nutrition Feline Medley20#

42869 00171

Wegman's Buju & Ziggie Original Medley Cat Food3.5#

77890 10006

PMI Nutrition Gravy Crunches Dog Food40#

42869 00033

Wegman's Buju & Ziggie Original Medley Cat Food18#

77890 10003

Red Flannel Active Formula Dog Food40#

42869 00063

Red Flannel Adult Formula Dog Food20#

42869 00055

Red Flannel Adult Formula Dog Food40#

42869 00054

Red Flannel Canine Select Dog Food20#

42869 00068

Red Flannel Canine Select Dog Food40#

42869 00067

Red Flannel Cat10#

42869 00059

Red Flannel Cat20#

42869 00058

Red Flannel Hi Pro Formula Dog Food50#

42869 00065

Red Flannel Prime Dog Food25#

42869 00052

Red Flannel Prime Dog Food50#

42869 00053

Red Flannel Puppy40#

42869 00056

FDA officials say salmonella can cause serious infections in dogs and cats -- and in humans if there is cross contamination from handling the pet food.

Salmonella is especially dangerous in children, the elderly, and people with compromised immune systems.

Symptoms of salmonella poisoning in humans include nausea, vomiting, diarrhea or bloody diarrhea, abdominal cramping and fever. In rare cases, salmonella can cause more serious ailments, such as arterial infections, endocarditis, arthritis, muscle pain, eye irritation, and urinary tract symptoms.

Consumers who have these symptoms after handling the pet food should immediately contact their doctor.

Pets with salmonella poisoning may be lethargic and have diarrhea or bloody diarrhea, fever, and vomiting.

Some pets will have only decreased appetite, fever, and abdominal pain, the company said. Any pets that have eaten the recalled products -- and show these symptoms -- should see a veterinarian.

The company said it is working with the FDA to determine the nature and source of the salmonella at the Everson facility. Mars will not resume production at the facility until the source of the salmonella is identified.

Mars also said it will also work with retail customers to ensure the recalled products are not on store shelves.

Consumers who have purchased products involved in this recall should return them for a full refund.

For more information about the recall, pet owners can contact the company at 1-877-568-4463 or visit its Web site: www.petcare.mars.com.

The FDA also has tips on safe pet food handling on its Web site.

More about pets ...



Mars Recalls More Pet Food...

Mars Petcare Recalls Some Pedigree Dog Food


A salmonella scare has forced Mars Petcare US to recall 100 of its 20-pound bags of PEDIGREE Complete Nutrition Small Crunchy Bites sold at some Albertsons in Southern California and Las Vegas, Nevada.

The company also makes Nutro pet food, which scores of consumers nationwide blame for the recent illnesses — and even deaths — of their dog and cats.

Nutro products, however, are not included in this recall.

Mars said a "component" that tested positive for salmonella was inadvertently shipped to its Tracy, California, plant and used in the production of 100 bags of PEDIGREE pet food.

The affected bags have the "best by" dates of July 7, 2009.

"Our primary concern is the safety and welfare of our pet owners and their pets," the company said in a statement. "Although the finished product tested negative and we have received no reports of illness of pets or their owners, out of an abundance of caution we are issuing a voluntary recall of the limited number of bags of Pedigree Complete Nutrition Small Crunchy Bites containing the component in question."

Mars said it is working with Albertsons to retrieve any of the affected bags still on store shelves or in distribution centers. Consumers who bought the food should return it to Albertsons for a full refund.

Mars also said it is cooperating with the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) on this recall.

Salmonella can cause infections in dogs and cats. It can also be transferred from pets to people who ingest or handle contaminated products. Children, the elderly, and those with compromised immune systems are most at risk.

To prevent the spread of salmonella contamination, the FDA said consumers should wash their hands for 20 seconds with hot water and soap before and after handling pet foods and treats.

Consumers should also:

• Wash pet food bowls, dishes, and scooping utensils with soap and hot water after each use;

• Not use their pets' feeding bowl as a scooping utensil. Pet owners should use a clean scoop or spoon;

• Dispose of old or spoiled pet food products in securely tied plastic bags and put them in a covered trash cans.

The FDA's Web site has additional tips on how to safely handle pet food.

More about pets ...



Mars said a "component" that tested positive for salmonella was inadvertently shipped to its Tracy, California, plant and used in the production of 100 bag...

Expert Finds Unexplained Pet Deaths 'Not Consistent'

There's still no definitive explanation for the health problems that scores of dogs and cats across the country have recently experienced after eating Nutro pet food. One expert says the illnesses are "not consistent" and not likely caused by the food. But others are not so sure.

Dr. Steven Hansen, a veterinary toxicologist who manages the Animal Poison Control Center for the American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (ASPCA), agreed to review the complaints ConsumerAffairs.com has received about Nutro pet food.

We gave Dr. Hansen unprecedented access to our complaint files in an effort to find out why so many pets have become sick — or even died — after eating Nutro food.

"Unfortunately the cases are not consistent and appear to be anecdotal with no real definitive diagnostic findings," Dr. Hansen told us. "Without any consistent trends in findings we can not do anything any further. This does appear to us to be a situation where bad things happen, but they are not likely food-related."

But another veterinarian, this one in South Carolina, suspects Nutro's food may have played a role in the May 22nd death of a dog that was under her care.

She is trying to find an independent lab to test the food and confirm her suspicions.

As a precaution, this veterinarian has told her local police chief to stop feeding Nutro to the dogs on the city's K-9 Unit.

In other developments:

• ConsumerAffairs.com continues to receive complaints about Nutro food and its possible connection to the illnesses and death dogs and cats nationwide. In the past three months, we have received more than 150 complaints from worried pet owners, many of them longtime Nutro customers;

• ConsumerAffairs.com has asked the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for all the complaints the agency has received in recent months about Nutro food. Despite a Freedom of Information request, the FDA has not yet produced the complaints, which were gathered by public employees at taxpayers' expense and are a matter of public record ;

• Nutro Products Inc. is closing down and laying off a total of 118 employees in City of Industry, California, according to a story posted on CoStar.com.

• A pet safety organization recently tested the Nutro food that two puppies in North Carolina ate before they died in June. The group, Pet Food Products Safety Alliance, tested the food for salmonella and e-coli. The samples were negative for those specific toxins.

Artful spinning

Nutro has posted a statement on its Web site claiming a recent ConsumerAffairs.com story falsely reported that its food had caused some pets to become sick. "Every NUTRO product that was analyzed in relation to the June 23 posting on ConsumerAffairs.com has been shown to be safe," the company wrote in response to our story.

In fact, the story in question said, "A series of mysterious illness and death dogs Nutro pet food. Scores of pet owners report their animals became ill while eating Nutro products, then recovered when they were switched to another brand." It did not directly attribute the reports to Nutro products.

As we've reported, scores of healthy pets across the country — and even some in Hawaii and Italy — have recently experienced sudden and recurring bouts of diarrhea, vomiting, and other digestive problems.

One common link among these dogs and cats is the brand of food they've eaten: Nutro.

Many pet owners who've written to us report that their pets' conditions immediately improved once they stopped eating Nutro.

An analysis of our complaints also revealed that at least seven healthy dogs have died after eating Nutro food. The owners suspect — but cannot prove — that Nutro's food played a role in their pets' deaths.

Employee reports

Former Nutro employees confirm that they have heard similar complaints about the company's food.

Several pet owners, they said, told them their dogs and cats had experienced the same types of health problems: diarrhea, vomiting, and lethargy.

The former employees reported their concerns to their supervisors, but said they were ignored. That's why they resigned.

Nutro, however, has repeatedly defended its food, saying it's "100 percent safe."

Cause still unknown

But if nothing is wrong with the food, why are so many pets getting sick after eating Nutro's products?

That's the mystery we hoped Dr. Hansen could help us solve.

He reviewed more than 50 complaints about Nutro, focusing on the cases in which pet owners had taken their dogs or cats to a vet. But those complaints, he said, revealed a myriad of illnesses.

"Right now, it looks like a mixture of reported clinical signs that reflect normal illnesses in the dog population," he said. "They don't speak to something consistently wrong with the pet food.

"Honestly, it is entirely possible that what we're seeing here (in these complaints) is a raised awareness of reporting illnesses."

In other words, pet owners are more aware of possible illnesses in their dogs and cats — probably because of the pet food recall.

What's Dr. Hansen's advice to worried pet owners?

"Speak to Nutro and your vet about your pets' illnesses. But based on what we see in these complaints, we don't suspect the food is related to these cases."

He added: "I appreciate you looking into these complaints. If we don't look at them, then we don't know what's going on. It's a good thing to ask questions and keep an eye out. And if there is a consistent pattern, then we need to keep looking. I'd rather have us be a little cautious than miss something serious."

K-9 alert

Meanwhile, a veterinarian in South Carolina is trying to solve her own mystery regarding Nutro.

Dr. Calley Hille suspects that food may have played a role in the recent death of one of her client's dogs — a 13-year-old German Shepherd named Elvis.

That healthy dog, she said, died one week after his owner switched him to Nutro's food with glucosamine. And he showed worrisome symptoms immediately after he ate the food.

"Within 20 minutes after eating the food, he started vomiting," Dr. Hille said.

A couple hours later, Elvis started having violent seizures.

"The next morning, his owners brought him in and we drew blood," she said. "The blood work indicated he had some type of food poisoning. He was vomiting, had diarrhea, and elevated pancreatic enzymes."

Dr. Hille immediately took Elvis off Nutro. A few days later, his owners found him in a puddle of water. They rushed him to Dr. Hille's office.

"I initiated CPR and also did a cardiac massage. I tried to pump his heart with my hands."

Despite her efforts, Elvis died.

"He was a healthy older dog," Dr. Hille said. "He was a beautiful 13-year-old German Shepherd. I wanted to know exactly what happened to Elvis. I wanted to know why he died."

That's why — with the owner's permission — she had the state vet do an autopsy on Elvis.

"I expected the necropsy to maybe show that he had a brain tumor, but he didn't have any neurological signs associated with that," Dr. Hille said.

Autopsy raises questions

The autopsy revealed that Elvis died of internal bleeding — apparently from a hematoma on his spleen. The findings surprised Dr. Hille — and raised more questions.

"The state vet couldn't give me any reason for Elvis to have a hematoma on his spleen," she said. "He also said there was no biological reason for Elvis to have had the seizures."

Dr. Hille, however, has a theory.

"In my opinion, the seizures caused the hematoma. It takes a blunt force for those to happen and Elvis had violent seizures. At one point, he was throwing himself against a wall. The seizures are what made the spleen start to bleed."

But what caused Elvis' sudden seizures? Could his pet food be a factor?

"It's most certainly possible that food poisoning could cause seizures," Dr. Hille said. "I'm not laying my credentials on the line and saying that Nutro caused them, but it makes sense."

She added: "Could it be a coincidence that Elvis died a week after he started eating the food? Yes. But no one can show me what that coincidence is. I asked the state vet why Elvis had the hematoma. He said he didn't know. I asked him why he had the seizures. He said he didn't know."

The state vet did not test for any toxins in Elvis' system. "I don't know why," Dr. Hille said.

But it makes her even more determined to test the food — and hopefully solve this mystery.

"We highly suspect there's a connection between the Nutro food and Elvis' seizures, which ultimately caused his death," she said. "His blood work showed signs of reaction to food. I think we can prove that if we test the food.

"But the state of South Carolina will not test it. They don't do that anymore. My problem is I don't know what to test for. I need to look into what toxins cause seizures."

There may be another culprit involved in this mystery — one that should also be tested.

"It's certainly possible that there is something in the (pet food) bags, especially if they're sitting in storage," Dr. Hille said. "If something is in the bag, the food is going to absorb it."

If those tests come back negative, is it possible that Elvis' age played a role in his death? That's not likely, Dr. Hille said.

"If it was an age thing, the state vet should have found it. And he didn't."

Baffled by Elvis' death, Dr. Hille has taken precautionary measures with other dogs she knows are eating Nutro food — specifically, members of K-9 Unit for the city of North Charleston, South Carolina.

Her husband is a handler for the dogs on that unit.

"I ran blood tests on all seven dogs in the K-9 unit," Dr. Hille said. "Three of the seven showed signs that they needed to get on better food. We have taken all the dogs off Nutro and put them on another food. "I ran those tests because of Elvis' case."

Elvis' owner applauds Dr. Hille's efforts to save her family's beloved German Shepherd. And she's just as committed to finding out what caused his sudden death.

"I don't want this to happen to someone else again," says Tracy H. of. North Charleston. "I am so distraught after having to watch my three kids see our wonderful dog die my 13-year-old son gave him CPR to try and keep him alive"

Tracy has searched for a lab — or state or federal agency — to test Elvis' food. But she's hit several roadblocks.

"I can't find anyone to test it. The Department of Agriculture (in S.C.) no longer does testing for toxicology. I called the FDA, but I got a recording. I did leave a message three times, but I never got a return call."

She's not giving up, though.

"It may cost me a great deal of money to pay for testing, but I will make sure that no one ever has to go through what my family has gone through. My sweet, sweet German Shepherd is gone forever and nothing will ever bring him back. But I will make sure that Nutro never does this to a dog again."

Nutro's response

ConsumerAffairs.com contacted Nutro about these concerns and Dr. Hansen's findings.

A company spokeswoman said all Nutro products undergo rigorous testing — beginning with the raw ingredients and ending with the finished products. And she said consumers should not worry about feeding their pets Nutro's foods.

"Nutro products are safe and conform to the standards set by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the U.S Department of Agriculture (USDA) and the Association of American Feed Control Officials (AAFCO)," Debra Fair, public relations manager for Mars Petcare, USA, said in a written statement. Mars acquired Nutro in May, 2007. "We are committed to working with these agencies and all stakeholders who share our goal of ensuring the safety of pet food products."

What about the concerns raised by Dr. Hille regarding Elvis' death?

Fair said it would be "irresponsible for us to speculate about the cause of the pet's illness" based on the limited information the company received from ConsumerAffairs.com.

"We encourage the attending veterinarian to contact us so that we can carefully review the details of the case," she said.

Fair also encouraged all consumers with concerns about Nutro to contact the company.

"While consumer concerns about Nutro product quality are rare, we take every complaint seriously. When we learn of an issue, we work with consumers to obtain information and request that samples of any product in question be submitted for testing at an independent facility."

She added: "An in-depth review is performed to determine if an issue does exist. All tested samples of product to date have been shown to be safe and conform to FDA, USDA and AAFCO standards."

She did not, however, state what toxins the company tested for or provide copies of any lab results.

Fair said that many consumers who have contacted ConsumerAffairs.com about Nutro have not shared their concerns with the company.

"A comprehensive review of our call center database shows that the vast majority of individuals posting on your site have not contacted Nutro or provided samples for testing."

Fair also said her company has made repeated efforts to contact all the consumers mentioned in a June 23 ConsumerAffairs.com story about the mysterious deaths of six dogs that had eaten Nutro. The story also focused on the sudden illnesses that pets nationwide and in Italy had experienced after eating the company's food.

"We've either spoken with or left multiple messages for all of the consumers cited in the June 23 posting," Fair said. "There is nothing that indicates that these pet health issues were caused by Nutro pet foods."

But pet owner Sharon A. of Cheektowaga, New York — who was included in our June 23 story — said no one from Nutro has contacted her.

"I've not heard from anyone at Nutro," she told us. Some of the other consumers in our June 23 story had already contacted Nutro.

But others would be hard for Nutro to find because we only identify consumers by their first names and last initials when their complaints are published. Nutro has never contacted ConsumerAffairs.com about those pet owners or asked how they could reach them, although a company spokesman said the information would be "immediately" provided.

"Whenever health and safety are involved, we are happy to immediately share consumer contact information with responsible company researchers, provided the companies agree that they will not take legal action against consumers making comments they object to," said ConsumerAffairs.com President James R. Hood. "No one from Nutro has ever bothered to contact us."

Meanwhile, Fair said her company concurred with Dr. Hansen's findings — and his suggestions to worried pet owners.

"We agree with his recommendation that it is important that consumers with concerns contact Nutro and their veterinarian."

Product shortages

Fair also addressed another issue we've raised before — the shortage of some Nutro products.

"The temporary availability issues that Nutro has experienced with certain products are operational in nature, not quality-related. Shortages of Nutro(tm) Natural Choice Lamb Meal and Rice products at some retail locations are due to the high demand for our products at a time of global shortages in lamb meal We have already secured additional, high-quality supply sources of most raw materials, and are currently working with suppliers in New Zealand and in the U.S. to establish an additional supply of lamb meal."

Some online bloggers have claimed that Nutro may recall some of its food. Fair denied that.

"We have no plans to recall Nutro products," she said.

What about the recent story about lay-offs by the company?

Fair declined to elaborate, stating: "As for the news item you shared regarding our locations in the City of Industry, we have no additional detail to add."

Fair said consumers or veterinarians with concerns or questions about Nutro can contact the company's Consumer Services Department at 1-800-833-5330.

Pet owners' experience

But grieving pet owners like Tracy say that doesn't do any good.

"I called Nutro and they said they have not had complaints of this nature and nor do they have any recalls on the dry food."

Worried pet owners can also contact their local FDA office to report their concerns about Nutro.

They can also call the ASPCA's Poison Control Center at (888) 426-4435.

More about pets ...



Expert Finds Unexplained Pet Deaths 'Not Consistent'...

Article Image

Illness, Death Dog Nutro Pet Food


A series of mysterious illness and death dogs Nutro pet food. Scores of pet owners report their animals became ill while eating Nutro products, then recovered when they were switched to another brand.

At least six dogs have died in the past two months, according to an analysis of complaints to ConsumerAffairs.com. The company discounts the reports, saying they are isolated and unconfirmed; at least one Nutro employee, sickened by the company's response, told us she resigned.

In related developments, ConsumerAffairs.com has learned:

• The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recently investigated the April deaths of two dogs in Indiana. The FDA tested samples of the Nutro food those dogs ate, but did not find any toxins. No one, however, has tested the Nutro food the other dogs ate before they died;

• A pet nutrition specialist for Nutro confirmed she's heard complaints about the company's food making dogs and cats sick. She reported those concerns to her supervisor, but said they were ignored. She recently resigned;

• There is a shortage of some varieties of Nutro dog food. The company says this is a supply problem not a safety or quality issue;

• Some consumers have sent their pets' food to Nutro for testing. They have not received any results. Other pet owners plan to hire private labs to test their food and report their concerns to the FDA and the Animal Poison Control Center run by the American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (ASPCA).

The six dogs that recently died include two Italian Greyhounds in Indiana, a Beagle/Whippet mix in Pennsylvania, two German Shepherd puppies in North Carolina, and a Doberman Pinscher in Texas.

The dogs' owners all say their pets were in good health and they're convinced that Nutro's food is somehow connected to their animals' deaths. Those concerns are echoed by pet owners whose dogs and cats have recently become sick after eating the company's food.

Nutro, however, defends its products and says the food is 100 percent safe.

But scores of pet owners across the country -- including longtime Nutro customers -- no longer feel safe feeding this brand of food to their dogs and cats.

Max and Sophia

They're consumers like Theresa C. of Indianapolis. Her two healthy Greyhounds -- Max and Sophia -- died within days after eating Nutro's Natural Choice Small Bites Lamb and Rice food.

"We bought Nutro for the first time in April," Theresa said. "And within four or five days, both of our dogs were dead.

"These were healthy dogs that have never been sick. They were extremely housetrained, but before they died, they both were urinating everywherewe were constantly refilling their water bowl."

Sophia, their four-year-old Italian Greyhound, showed the first signs of illness.

"On Sunday, April 27, she was vomiting, acting dizzy, and she became skittish," Theresa said. "Italian Greyhounds also don't smell, but I noticed Sophia had an unusual smell before she died. It was almost a sickening smell; I've never smelled anything like it before."

Sophia's condition quickly deteriorated.

"She continued to vomit up liquid and bile into the early hours of Monday, April 28," Theresa said. "And she became dizzy and almost appeared to be drunk."

Theresa rushed Sophia to the emergency animal hospital.

"By the time I got her there she was comatose and in kidney failure. She had to be euthanized."

Max, her three-year-old Italian Greyhound, had started to experience the same problems.

"He began vomiting at 2:30 am, but was not as ill as Sophia had been," Theresa said. "When I got him to the vet she found elevated creatinine and BUN (blood urea nitrogen) levels. She administered an IV and retested later in the evening on the 28th. The levels were still rising but, she said he may pull through."

Max's condition, however, did not improve.

"By the morning of the 29th he had blood in the whites of his eyes, was vomiting again, and showing signs of distress," Theresa said. "We again had his blood checked and the levels were through the roof."

Max's kidneys were failing.

"Our vet told us there is no hope because he was in renal failurewe decide to euthanize to limit his suffering."

Losing both dogs -- in such a short period time -- was heart-wrenching for Theresa, her husband, and their six children.

"I don't know who cried more me, my husband, or my 20-year-old son. I was a mess for a week."

Despite her grief, Theresa vowed to find the cause of Max and Sophia's sudden deaths. Her vet suspected antifreeze poisoning.

"But we don't have antifreeze around our home," Theresa said. "These dogs were never alone. And we have the same neighbors we've had since Max was a puppy. I didn't see how it could antifreeze poisoning."

Theresa had autopsies done on her dogs at Purdue University. She sent samples of their kidney tissues to Michigan State University for testing.

She and her family also contacted the FDA and Nutro.

"Our 20-year-old son called Nutro after Sophia died and he asked if there was something wrong with the food. He said we've already had one dog die and another one is sick.

"The girl at Nutro said we've had complaints, but nothing that is a known issue right now."

FDA tests

The FDA immediately investigated the dogs' deaths.

"An investigator came over to my home before we had the autopsy results back," Theresa said. "He took samples of the food and had me file a complaint."

ConsumerAffairs.com confirmed that on May 7, 2008, an FDA investigator took samples of Theresa's Nutro food and had it tested for several contaminants, including melamine, aflatoxins, and ethylene glycol. That's a chemical in antifreeze.

Those tests did not find any toxins in the food.

"Findings were negative for melamine and its analog, aflatoxins, ethylene glycol and diethylene glycol, and for salmonella," the lab report stated. "No significant filth or foreign material was found."

Antifreeze

Theresa is baffled by the FDA's findings.

"I wonder if there's something in the food they're not testing for," she said after reviewing the FDA's report.

Theresa is also puzzled by the autopsy results on her dogs and the tests run on their kidney tissues.

Those examinations revealed Max and Sophia had high levels of ethylene glycol in their systems, which indicated the dogs' deaths were consistent with antifreeze poisoning.

With Theresa's permission, ConsumerAffairs.com sent copies of her dogs' medical records to veterinary toxicologist, Dr. Steven Hansen. He's the senior vice-president of the ASPCA's Midwest Office, which houses the organization's Animal Poison Control Center.

After reviewing the reports with a pathologist in his office, Dr. Hansen said: "The kidney lesions do not fit with melamine but are consistent with ethylene glycol. Since ethylene glycol was confirmed in high concentrations in the kidneys and not in the diet the diagnosis in this case is clear. Unfortunately, the dogs did die of antifreeze poisoning."

Theresa, however, still has her doubts.

"I know these dogs didn't get near antifreezeespecially in these extreme amounts," said Theresa, who may hire a private lab to test her Nutro food. "Like I said, I wonder if there's something in the food that no one is testing for."

Blue death

Two states away, another grieving pet owner shares Theresa's concerns about Nutro's food.

Susi B. of Pittsburgh, Pa., said her healthy ten-year-old Beagle/Whippet mix died on May 30th. She suspects Nutro's Lamb and Rice food is the culprit behind the sudden death of her beloved dog, Blue.

"I bought that bag at the end of March, and when I opened it up, it looked like it had little white bugs all over it," said Susi, a longtime Nutro customer. "When I picked up the food, it was like a granular substance. But I didn't think much about it because the food wasn't part of the recall."

Blue, she said, gradually started to become sick.

"I'd come home and see where he'd thrown up. But I didn't think about the food."

When she returned from work on April 18, Susi found Blue collapsed on the floor.

"Normally, he'd run to the door and greet me, but when I walked in that day I couldn't find him right away. He was on the floor and breathing heavy."

Susi immediately took Blue to the vet.

"But the vet couldn't find anything except an elevated white count, a low red blood count (he was anemic), and he had a temperature," Susi said. "They gave him an antibiotic and vitamins."

Susi also took Blue off his Nutro food and fed him hamburger and rice.

"And he got better. So over the next couple of weeks, I slowly reintroduced the Nutro dog food to him."

Blue's condition worsened again.

"He got to the point that when I put Nutro in front of him, he refused to eat it," she said. "And he was a dog who would eat everything. He didn't want to eat anything except melted ice cream.

"His weight went from 26 pounds to 18 pounds. He was skin and bones. He was lethargic. He became so weak he could no longer walk outside to use the bathroom or stand to drink water."

That's when Susi launched her own investigation.

"I went online and Googled Nutro and found out (on ConsumerAffairs.com) about all these other dogs that had symptoms like mine."

Bare shelves

She also discovered that some of Nutro's pet foods -- including the variety she'd fed Blue -- were no longer on the shelves at her local pet store.

"There was a note in the store that said the shortage was due to some manufacturing issues."

Susi immediately called Nutro to get some answers.

"I was told the reason the food was not on the shelves was because the company that made the bags had a machine break, and the company ran out of chicken. But I was feeding lamb and rice."

What about the complaints regarding Nutro's food?

"They said they were aware of your Web site and considered it nothing but a blog," Theresa said. "They said when one person posted (a complaint) it caused a panic, and none of those dogs' owner have contacted us."

At Nutro's request, Susi sent the company four cups of Blue's food for testing.

That was several weeks ago, but she has not received any results.

"I'm trying to find an independent lab to test the food, but some say it would be a conflict of interest to test the food and others say they don't know what to test for."

Susi said she'll keep digging for answers until she finds out what caused Blue to suddenly die in his sleep on May 30th.

"I'm convinced Blue's death is tied to that food and I won't stop until I prove it," she said, adding the last test done on her dogs indicated he had a blood tumor. "If I had listened to my dog, he might be alive today."

The guilt and pain surrounding Blue's death, she said, is almost unbearable.

"It's devastating. He was my best friend for more than ten years. He followed me all over the house. And in a matter of six to eight weeks after we opened that last bag of food, he'd gotten to the point that I had to carry him outside and hold him up to go to the bathroom.

"I am 100 percent convinced there is something in that food that is affecting these animals," she added. "It's not a coincidence that all these dogs are getting sick."

Dead puppies

A grieving pet owner in North Carolina echoes those suspicions about Nutro's food.

Birgit H. of Franklinville said two of her puppies -- from the same litter of seven -- suddenly died on June 3rd.

The healthy six-week-old German Shepherds -- Anna and Anja -- had similar symptoms as the other dogs that died after eating Nutro's food.


Anna and Anja

"They were vomiting, had diarrhea, and were lethargic," Birgit said.

What's so alarming to Birgit is the speed at which the puppies' health deteriorated.

"We started feeding them Nutro puppy food on June 2 and they died on June 3," she said. "I worked in a vet's office for ten years and I've never seen anything like this before. I've never seen dogs going down so fast, then get back up, then eat again, and crash. They got so weak and died so fast."

The veterinarians who treated the puppies couldn't explain their sudden deaths.

"They were puzzled because the puppies did fine in the morning, but that afternoon, they just died," Birgit said. "One died at home and one died at the vet's office.

"Everyone is puzzled by this. The first thing you think of with puppies is Parvo (a viral illness). But there weren't symptoms of Parvo. And if one dog has Parvo, they all have it. There's no way that happened. These puppies were healthy before we put them on Nutro."

The other five puppies in the litter -- and the mother dog -- also showed signs of illness.

"All the other puppies had started throwing up," Birgit said. "Then I received a phone call from another breeder and he asked me if I had recently switched to Nutro food. He told me about all the other dogs that had gotten sick on the food.

"That night, my husband and I put the dogs back on their old food and everyone is fine again."

Her friend's call, she said, saved her dogs' lives.

"I would have killed all my dogs because I would have kept feeding them that food."

Nutro not alarmed

Birgit contacted Nutro, but said the company didn't seem alarmed by the loss of her dogs.

"I've been on the phone with Nutro three times and they're blowing me off. I told them they need to take the food off the shelf and test it. But the person I talked to said the company won't do that; they said they have quality food."

In another call to Nutro in which she waited for an hour to talk to someone -- the company "finally took a report."

"But they didn't ask me for a lot number on the bag or the date of purchase," Birgit said. "All they gave me was a customer number. That's it. They really disappointed me."

Nutro also wanted the rest of Birgit's puppy food.

"I told them 'no. I'm not sending you all my food.' They didn't like that. I'm thinking of getting it tested somewhere else." She also plans to contact the FDA and the ASPCA's Animal Poison Control Center about her puppies' deaths.

Nutro, however, did offer Birgit an explanation for the sudden deaths of her puppies and the recent illnesses in pets nationwide that have eaten the company's food.

"They said it was a coincidence."

Birgit doesn't buy that explanation.

"Maybe one or two cases could be a coincidence. But it can't be a coincidence with so many cases. And it can't be a coincidence that once you take the dogs off the food they're fine.

"I'm not one to point fingers, but as soon as I took the puppies off the Nutro food, we didn't have any more vomiting, diarrhea, or lethargy. They are now all doing great. So is their mom. Nutro needs to take this food off the shelves and test it."

Until that happens, this professional dog breeder will not recommend Nutro to her clients.

"I always thought it was a good food, but now, I wouldn't feed Nutro to my worst enemy."

McGee

Neither will a grieving pet owner in Texas.

Peter B. of Houston said his nine-year-old Doberman Pinscher, McGee, suddenly died in April.

McGee ate Nutro, too.

And his symptoms mirror those of the other dogs that have recently died after eating Nutro's food.

"He was a healthy Dobermanhe was fine before," Peter said. That all changed on April 27.

"I came home around 6pm and was outside watering my lawn," Peter said. "I noticed McGee was on the ground and had thrown up. He was also shaking."

As the night progressed, McGee's condition took a turn for the worse. He threw up again.

"And it looked like more food that I'd given him," Peter said. "He was also thirsty. He just wasn't himself."

Later that evening, Peter noticed McGee had started breathing heavily.

"And he kept getting water. He then started shaking againhe just wasn't right.

"McGee went back outside at 2 am," Peter continued. "When he came back in, he got some water and then he was sitting in the hallway."

A short time later, McGee came back into Peter's bedroom.

"He flopped down and he was breathing heavily, he was shaking, and crying."

Peter rushed to get McGee immediate medical attention.

"We tried to get him in our SUV and all of the sudden, he collapsed. I put him in the back and probably did 100 mph going to the vet."

But McGee died on the way.

"He was gone when we got there. They tried CPR, but he was gone."

The veterinarian wasn't sure what caused McGee's sudden death. "He was pretty generic," Peter said. "But he said it might have been some type of heart arrhythmia.

"In hindsight, I wish I would have gotten an autopsy, but it was such a shocker."

Peter, however, started researching possible causes for McGee's sudden death.

"I put in some of the symptoms he had and Googled them," he said. "And Nutro kept showing up. I thought that was scary because that's what I've always fed him. But I noticed that these problems seemed to be a lot more recentthey were new problems."

Peter contacted Nutro about McGee's death.

"I've sent them three e-mails, but they haven't responded. I tried the 800-number, but it kept ringing and ringing."

No Nutro

Peter also stopped by the local pet store where he bought McGee's food.

"The shelves that contained Nutro Natural Choice were almost bare. That never has happened."

He asked a Nutro representative -- who was working in the same aisle -- about the shortage.

"He stated that no recall was in effect, and Nutro just happened to shut down a few plants producing what he termed 'not as tasty food,' and the 'quality' was not up to par."

That explanation didn't make sense to Peter.

"Seeing that a dog can't talk, I asked him how the company would know if the food was not 'tasty.' It seemed far more plausible that a company whose main product is dog food would not shut down a plant -- and have no product -- unless some very extreme situations were coming to light."

Peter then told the Nutro representative about McGee's sudden death.

The representative called it a "coincidence."

But Peter is certain something is wrong with Nutro's food. He plans to hire a private lab to test the food and prove his theory.

"I'm doing this because something has truly happened. I don't have any evidence now, but based on my dog's symptoms and all the complaints I've read, the logical deduction is the food probably got some dogs sick, and in my case, caused my dog's death.

He added: "I will not let this be swept under the rug and hopefully will get the confirmation I am looking for by testing the pet food I still have."

Scores sickened

During our investigation, we found that scores of pets -- primarily dogs -- continue to become seriously ill after eating Nutro's food.

Consider what happened to a healthy, three-year-old Chocolate Lab named Choco.

His owner, Sharon A., of Cheektowaga, New York, has fed him Nutro Max for the past five months.

He never had any problems eating the food until April.

"That's when he suddenly got sick," she said. "He started vomiting, had loose bowel movements (diarrhea) and was very lethargic. It really worried me so I took him to the vet.

"He even threw up at the vet's office."

The veterinarian diagnosed Choco with pancreatitis (an inflammation of the pancreas).

"They put him on IV's, gave him some antibiotics and Pepcid, and kept him hospitalized for three days," Sharon said. "When I brought him home, he was much better almost back to normal."

The vet also switched Choco to a prescription dog food.

"They told me when he was done with that food he could go back to Nutro. But when I put him back on Nutro, he got sick again with the same symptoms."

Her vet ran additional tests on Choco.

"This time, they said he did not have pancreatitis, but they gave him antibiotics anyway."

Choco's condition, however, did not improve.

"He got sick again and I took him to the vet for a third time," Sharon said. "They said his levels were elevated again for pancreatitis. They put him on IV's and other medications."

Like other pet owners, Sharon started to investigate her dog's symptoms. Her search led her to ConsumerAffairs.com.

"I couldn't believe all those people on your Web site whose dogs had the same symptoms as mine," Sharon said. "After I read all those, I stopped feeding Choco the Nutro food. And he's now gotten better."

Does she think it's a coincidence that so many pets have become sick after eating Nutro's food?

No way.

"They get sick when they're eating Nutro they have vomiting, diarrhea, and they're lethargic," said Sharon. "And they get better when they stop eating the food. I don't think that's a coincidence."

Overseas complaints

Our investigation also found that some dogs overseas are now experiencing similar health problems after eating Nutro's food.

We learned that two healthy Italian Greyhounds, who live on a U.S. military base in Italy, recently became sick.

Their owner, Michelle M., purchased their Nutro food at the base's commissary.

"I thought the yard started to smell funny after they had been on Nutro for a couple of weeks," she said. "I noticed that they threw up regularly, particularly the nine-month old."

His condition worsened last week.

"He woke up and started to whine for no reason," she said. "He was clearly in pain, if he stood up his back legs shook, then he would go lie down. He has been lethargic all day and has passed four bloody/mucus-filled stools."

Michelle desperately searched for answers.

She ran an online search of Nutro and was shocked to learn that scores of other dogs -- eating the same brand of food -- had experienced similar problems.

"I am detached from all of the press stateside and am very upset that no effort has been made to alert military families overseas of a possible problem (with the food.)"

Michelle stopped feeding her dogs Nutro and is now cooking chicken and rice for them.

"I'm hoping there will not be any long-term health consequences for my boys. They are both members of my family and my children and I love them immensely."

She added: "I'm glad we caught this in time, unlike some of the others who have reported very serious illnesses or even death associated with this brand of dog food. If the FDA is examining Nutro, they need to move quickly -- it is hard to tell how many people at overseas military bases are feeding this (food) to their dogs and possibly killing them."

Ex-Nutro employee

Michelle's complaint -- and the scores of others we received about Nutro food -- don't surprise a former pet nutrition specialist for the company.

"I would say that about 20 people in the last six months came up to me and said their pets were having similar problems with Nutro's food," the former employee told us. "They said their dogs and cats were vomiting, they were lethargic, had diarrhea, and were drinking lots of water."

The former employee, who asked not to be identified, reported those complaints to her boss. But her concerns, she said, fell on deaf ears.

"Every time I brought it up the chain, my concerns were brushed off. All I kept hearing about was the wonderful quality controls Nutro has."

Frustrated by the company's lack of response and worried about the safety of pets nationwide -- the employee left Nutro and agreed to share her concerns with us.

"I do not feel comfortable promoting a product that is currently showing a very strong correlation with causing pet illness or death," said the employee, who is also a certified veterinary technician. "For 82 years Nutro had stood on its own as a leader in pet specialty. This past year, Nutro has lost consumer confidence and shaken my confidence as well. Something is wrong."

News of the recent deaths possibly linked to Nutro's food is especially troubling to this former employee.

"On my last day, one of the managers of a store I worked with came to me and reported a very recent death of a young dog. The dog's owner and its vet highly suspect it was caused by Nutro Lamb and Rice (small bites).

"I sure hope that it wasn't the Nutro food, but due to some of these sudden death incidents it makes me fearful that it is," the former employee said.

She wondered if these health problems could be related to the way Nutro's food is stored and transported on trucks.

"Are there pesticides on those trucks?" she asked. "The bags are not covered in plastics when they arrive at the stores. They're in paper bags. Could something be leaching into the bags? Is something happening during the transport? It's just a theory.

"I think that further testing needs to be done with the food."

'Hearsay'

We contacted Nutro about the complaints we've received regarding its food.

A company spokesperson, who resigned last week, directed us to Nutro's Web site.

The company posted new information after we started asking questions about Nutro's food and its possible connection to the illnesses and deaths of pets nationwide.

"All NUTRO products are 100 percent safe and conform to the standards set by the FDA, USDA, and AAFCO," the Web site states. "NUTRO pet foods undergo rigorous quality assurance testing, beginning with raw ingredients and ending with testing all finished products. This includes testing to confirm that no melamine, mold toxins, or pathogenic bacteria are detected in any NUTRO pet foods."

The company said the complaints we've received are "isolated reports of inaccurate information posted online."

"Many blogs and Internet sites can be a repository for misinformation and hearsay regarding many topics," the company wrote.

Nutro said the recent shortages of some of its foods are supply issues and have nothing to do with any safety concerns.

"Over the past several months, suppliers of key ingredients used in select products have been unable to meet Nutro's volume needs," the company stated. "We have secured additional high quality supply sources and while availability will vary by marketplace, we can now say that supply issues are being resolved."

The company said its Natural Choice Venison Meal and Brown Rice, and Natural Choice Herring Meal, Rice and Potato foods should arrive in stores later this month.

Nutro denied reports that any of its plants are closing.

Formulas changed

The company also confirmed that it recently changed some of its formulas.

"MAX Dog and MAX Cat foods have been improved with the addition of more chicken and/or salmon," the company stated. "MAX Large Breed Puppy and MAX Large Breed Adult are now being made with chicken meal rather than beef meal because preference testing has shown that dogs prefer the taste of the chicken product."

The company said it rarely receives complaints about its products, but takes all concerns seriously. Customers can contact Nutro's Consumer Service line at 1-800-833-5330.

"In the rare instance when a consumer does have a concern with any of our products, an in-depth review of the consumer-provided samples is performed to determine if an issue does exist," the company stated.

We asked Nutro if it had recently tested its foods for possible toxins. The company did not respond to that question.

Meanwhile, some loyal Nutro customers warn pet owners not to jump to conclusions based on what they call unsubstantiated claims posted on the Internet.

Veterinarians also told us it's not uncommon for pets to have sudden bouts of vomiting, diarrhea, and other gastrointestinal problems.

They said a number of factors -- pet food, stress, or a viral infection-- could be the culprit.

But Dr. Hansen with the ASPCA agreed that additional testing and research should be done in these cases.

He encouraged pet owners to report any problems with Nutro to the FDA, his organization's Poison Control Center, the pet food maker, and their veterinarians.

Still a mystery

For now, the recent illnesses and deaths in many pets that have eaten Nutro remains a mystery.

Even to pet owners like Theresa, who still believes that Nutro played a role in the deaths of her Italian Greyhounds.

"I have a gut feeling something in that food is making dogs sick and killing others. And I truly believe it is what killed both my dogsI just wish we could prove it."

More about pets ...



The dogs' owners all say their pets were in good health and they're convinced that Nutro's food is somehow connected to their animals' deaths....

Pet Owners Not Thrilled with Poison Food Settlement


Grieving pet owners -- whose dogs and cats became sick or died last year after eating melamine-tainted food -- are one step closer to recovering their economic losses, though not all consumers are applauding a proposed settlement.

One called it "a slap in the face."

A U.S. District Court Judge in Camden, New Jersey yesterday gave preliminary approval to a $24 million settlement in a class action lawsuit that stems from the largest pet food recall in U.S. history.

Last March, Menu Foods of Canada recalled 60 millions of containers of dog and cat food that were tainted with melamine, a chemical used to make plastics.

Thousands of dogs and cats across North America suffered kidney disease after eating the contaminated food. Many died.

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) traced the source of that contamination to wheat gluten imported from China.

The $24 million settlement is in addition to the $8 million in claims some companies involved in the pet food litigation have already paid bringing the total figure to $32 million.

A hearing is set for October 14, 2008, on final approval of the settlement, which would resolve more than 100 class action lawsuits filed in U.S. and Canadian courts in the wake of the massive pet food recall.

Lawyers, company react

"We think this (settlement) is a win for consumers," said Sherrie Savett, one of the plaintiffs' attorneys in the case. "With this settlement, consumers will get as much or more than if they litigated the cases individually. The claims process allows people to recover as much as 100 percent of all their economic damages.

She added: "What we did get out of this settlement for consumers is the possibility of complete recovery of all economic damages -- even for lost carpets and time -- in addition to their veterinary bills. Even in cases where people do not have documentation of their damages, the settlement allows in some cases up to $900 for each person."

Menu Foods, which manufactures dog and cat food under nearly 100 brand names, applauded the settlement.

"Menu Foods is pleased with this negotiated settlement," Paul Henderson, the company's chief economic officer, said in a written statement. "If finally approved, the agreement will provide restitution to the pet owners affected by the 2007 pet food recalls.

"We feel that the pet owners, along with Menu and other pet food producers, were victims of a terrible fraud committed by a company in China," Henderson said.

Pet owners divided

Some pet owners, however, told ConsumerAffairs.com the settlement is not a victory for consumers.

Don Earl, whose beloved cat Chuckles died after eating Menu Foods' Pet Pride food, called the settlement "a slap in the face."

"Extrapolating from the best information available, over a quarter million pets were killed by the poisoned pet food epidemic," he said. "Take a third off the top for the attorneys, and divide by the number of pet owners harmed, they each will get $64."

An Arizona pet owner -- whose 13-year-old Sheltie suddenly died after eating some of the tainted pet food -- agreed.

"I feel that the $24 million is less than a slap on the wrist," said Jerry L. of Goodyear, Arizona. "It's a sad state of affairs and just goes to prove that until pet owners who really care about their pets push their government for stronger laws, these companies will continue to hold our pets at little or no regard.

"The only thing I can say is that I'm saddened and disappointed that our pets are held at so little value," she added. "Sandy Boy's ashes remain in my home and his picture remains proudly displayed around our home."

Pet owner Carol V., of Rhode Island, whose two cats became gravely ill last year after eating Menu Foods' Special Kitty food, echoed those sentiments.

"Twenty-four million dollars does not seem a lot before legal expenses," she said. "And if there are tens of thousands of affected pets (which I believe may be a low estimate), it seems unlikely that pet owners will get back all of their expenses.

"This amount also seems insufficient to me as we are talking about multi-billion dollar companies participating in this settlement."

A monetary settlement, Carol said, can never erase the pain and suffering her cats -- and her family -- experienced because of the tainted food.

One of her cats, Jessica, had to be euthanized last December because of the health problems she suffered after eating the contaminated food.

"There is no amount of money that will ever make this right in my home," Carol said. "Whether it is one penny or the close to three thousand dollars for my vet -- nothing will erase the memory of my cats struggling with trying to stand on their own, hanging over the water bowl, and hanging onto life for months as Smudge (her cat) did and now she struggles with chronic kidney damage and all because I fed them Association Of American Feed Control Officials (AAFCO) approved cat food."

Canadian author Ann Martin, who has researched the pet food industry for years, is pleased dog and cat owners will receive some compensation.

"Money, no matter how much, will never replace the pets they have lost due to the contaminated food," she said.

Lesson learned?

Martin and others said pet food makers and the government must now -- in the wake of the massive recall and settlement -- ensure the food that consumers feed their pets is safe. But they are not convinced that's happened.

"I really don't think the food on the shelves now is any safer than what we saw prior to the massive recall," Martin said. "How many of these pet food companies are testing for contamination in the raw materials they are purchasing? It is my understanding that some are now testing for melamine in the grains, but this is just one toxin that might be in the raw material. Are they testing the vitamin/mineral premixes, many which are coming from China or other countries with questionable practices?"

The settlement requires pet food makers to continue testing ingredients imported from China. That, however, doesn't make Martin feel any safer about feeding her animals commercial pet food.

"I'll continue to feed my pets a homemade diet," she said. "At least I know what they are eating, which is more than you can say with many of the pet foods on the market."

Carol is also leery about feeding her pets commercial food.

The system to protect dogs and cats from experiencing another pet food nightmare, she said, is still broken.

"I am not sure what makes me more mad -- that it took a courtroom full of lawyers to come to this decision (settlement), or the fact that I see no changes to our current food supply system to prevent this from happening again. The illness and deaths of beloved four-legged family members should have been a huge wake-up call that the system is broken."

Pet owners like Don Earl said some good has come from the massive recall.

"Many pet owners (including myself) have switched from the recycled garbage promoted as pet food to homemade," he said. "Their pets will live much longer and healthier lives."

Other consumers said the recall has made pet owners more aware of what's in the food their feed their dogs and cats.

And thanks to this settlement, that food should be safer than before the recall, said attorney Sherrie Savett.

"Pet food manufacturers know they will get hit with lawsuits that are meaningful (if their food isn't safe), she said. "I think that would cause pet food manufacturers to be much more careful."

What to do

Meanwhile, pet owners affected by the tainted food can still file claims for their losses.

Those consumers should not contact Menu Foods, the company said. Instead, they should contact the claims administration for the settlement at the following:

In re Pet Food Products Liability Litigation, Claims Administrator
c/o Heffler, Radetich & Saitta LLP,
P.O. Box 890,
Philadelphia, PA 19105-0890

1-800-392-7785

www.petfoodsettlement.com

Blizzard of litigation

Pet owners in 19 states -- and Ontario -- filed dozens of lawsuits against Menu Foods in the weeks that followed the March 16, 2007, nationwide recall of dog and cat food. Those cases were consolidated in a federal court in Camden, New Jersey.

The lawsuits alleged unfair and deceptive trade practices, negligence in failing to provide adequate quality control and breach of implied and express warranties.

Some consumers also claimed they suffered emotional trauma after their pets became sick or died.

Pet owners also sought compensation for their veterinary bills.

Companies named in the lawsuits -- besides Menu Foods -- included Del Monte Foods Inc. of San Francisco; Nestle of Stamford, Conn.; Procter & Gamble in Cincinnati; Xuzhou Anying Biologic Technology Development Co. Ltd. in Pixian, China; and Suzhou Textile Import and Export Co. in Jiangsu, China.

Those defendants -- and Menu Foods' product liability insurance company -- will cover the costs of the settlement.

Menu Foods estimated the recall has cost the company $53.8 million.

Cause of death

Veterinarians now blame the dogs' and cats' deaths on the combination of two chemicals FDA officials found in the tainted pet food: melamine and cyanuric acid, which is used to chlorinate pools.

Neither chemical is approved in pet food.

Veterinarians said those two chemicals can combine and form crystals in the dogs' and cats' bodies. And those crystals can impair the animals' kidney function.

"Either one of those chemicals alone wouldn't cause these (deaths)," Dr. Barbara Powers, immediate past president of the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians (AAVLD) and director of Colorado State University's Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory, told ConsumerAffairs.com. "It has to be the combination of the two. "

More about pets ...



Pet Owners Not Thrilled with Poison Food Settlement...

Pet Food Makers Agree to $24 Million Settlement


Parties involved in the litigation surrounding the largest pet food recall in U.S. history -- blamed for the deaths and illnesses of thousands of dogs and cats in North America -- have agreed to settle the case for $24 million.

The proposed settlement -- triggered by last year's recall of 60 million containers of melamine-tainted dog and cat food -- was filed last Thursday in the U.S. District Court of New Jersey.

A hearing to approve the settlement is set for May 30.

The tainted pet food debacle started last March when Menu Foods of Canada recalled millions of containers of dog and cat food.

The company -- which manufacturers dog and cat food under nearly 100 brand names -- took that action after pets across the country that ate its food suffered kidney problems and became ill or died.

"The Settlement Agreement will create a Settlement Fund of $24 million that will allow a potential recovery of up to 100% of all economic damages related to the pet food recall that were incurred by pet owners and persons who purchased recalled pet food in the United States and in Canada, subject to several limitations," Menu Foods wrote in a press release.

Under the proposed settlement, pet owners can file claims for medical expenses and reimbursement of burial or cremation costs. Pet owners who do not have documentation for these expenses can receive up to $900 each.

According to The Kansas City Star, the settlement sets aside $250,000 for reimbursement of recalled products, $400,000 for pet owners who paid to have their dogs and cats screened for health problems, and the remainder will cover all other economic damages, including those related to the death or injury of a pet.

Jeniphr Breckenridge, one of the plaintiffs' attorneys in the case, told the newspaper she is pleased with the settlement. "But at the same time, we recognize that there is no legal settlement that can compensate pet owners for losing a pet," she said.

Menu Foods initially blamed the contamination on a chemical called Aminopterin, which is used as a rat poison and to treat cancer.

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) later discovered an ingredient used to make the pet food -- wheat gluten imported from China -- was tainted with the chemical melamine.

Melamine is used to make plastics.

Under the proposed settlement, pet food makers must continue testing ingredients imported from China.

In December, veterinarians blamed the dogs' and cats' deaths on the combination of two chemicals FDA officials found in the tainted pet food: melamine and cyanuric acid, which is used to chlorinate pools.

Neither chemical is approved in pet food.

Veterinarians said those two chemicals can combine and form crystals in the dogs' and cats' bodies. And those crystals can impair the animals' kidney function.

"Either one of those chemicals alone wouldn't cause these (deaths)," Dr. Barbara Powers, immediate past president of the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians (AAVLD) and director of Colorado State University's Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory, told ConsumerAffairs.com. "It has to be the combination of the two.

"So it's not melamine alone."

Pet owners in 19 states -- and Ontario -- filed dozens of lawsuits against Menu Foods in the weeks that followed the March 16, 2007, nationwide recall of dog and cat food.

Those cases were consolidated in a federal court in Camden, New Jersey.

The lawsuits alleged unfair and deceptive trade practices, negligence in failing to provide adequate quality control and breach of implied and express warranties.

Some consumers also claimed they suffered emotional trauma after their pets became sick or died.

Pet owners sought compensation for their veterinary bills.

Companies named in the lawsuits -- besides Menu Foods -- included Del Monte Foods Inc. of San Francisco; Nestle of Stamford, Conn.; Procter & Gamble in Cincinnati; Xuzhou Anying Biologic Technology Development Co. Ltd. in Pixian, China; and Suzhou Textile Import and Export Co. in Jiangsu, China.

Those defendants -- and Menu Foods' product liability insurance company -- will cover the costs of the settlement.

Menu Foods estimated the recall cost the company $53.8 million.

The company said pet owners with potential claims should not contact Menu Foods regarding the proposed settlement. A third party claims administrator appointed by the court will oversee the Settlement Fund, the company said. Once the settlement is approved, Menu Foods said it will post contact information for the claims administrator on its Web site.

More about pets ...



Pet Food Makers Agree to $24 Million Settlement...

Article Image

String of Illnesses Afflicts NUTRO-Fed Pets


A worrisome health trend among dogs and cats across the country has surfaced in the past few months. Scores of pets from California to South Carolina have experienced sudden and recurring bouts of diarrhea, vomiting, and other digestive problems.

Through an examination of reports submitted by readers, ConsumerAffairs.com has uncovered a common link among these pets: They all ate the same brand of food: NUTRO pet food.

In all of the cases we've examined, the animals' conditions improved once their owners switched them to another brand of food.

"I've been feeding my chocolate Lab, Indy, NUTRO for almost four years," said Laura F. of Las Vegas, Nevada. "He's always been happy, healthy, and big. Recently I switched him to NUTRO (Natural Choice) Lite at my vet's request. Three weeks ago, he started vomiting uncontrollably."

Laura said her veterinarian initially thought Indy had pancreatitis, an inflammation of the pancreas. The vet prescribed some medication and Indy's condition gradually improved.

"Now, three weeks later, he started vomiting again," she said, adding she continued to feed her dog NUTRO. "He's now lost about 8 pounds in three weeks and is weak and lethargic.

"The vet believes -- as do I -- that it is the food," she said.

Laura switched brands of dog food and Indy's health improved. After a while, Laura tried mixing in the NUTRO with the new food. But that turned out to be a bad idea.

"The vomiting started again," Laura said. "I also noticed that he only ate about half his food and was actually dropping the NUTRO out and trying to only eat the Science Diet. I think even my dog knows there is something wrong with the NUTRO food.

"I will never feed any of my pets NUTRO again."

Similar stories

We've heard similar stories and sentiment from scores of pet owners nationwide -- many of whom are loyal NUTRO customers. We've also heard from a pet store employee, who noticed these same digestive problems with her clients' pets that ate NUTRO products.

A pet owner in South Carolina told us that she found foreign objects in her last few bags of NUTRO foods.

And a disabled woman in California said all these pets' health problems have given her a horrible sense of dj vu. Her service dog, she said, experienced these same digestive problems a few years ago after eating NUTRO food.

"I would not venture to give any pet one nugget of NUTRO food after what my dog went through," said Maggie D. of San Francisco.

NUTRO responds

NUTRO, however, defended its products.

A spokeswoman told us she is unaware of any substantiated medical problems like these linked to her company's pet food.

Many NUTRO customers also tout the food, saying it's an excellent product. Veterinarians told ConsumerAffairs.com that many factors can cause gastrointestinal problems in dogs and cats, including changes in diet, newly-developed sensitivities to pet food, or viral infections.

But scores of pet owners who've contacted us are convinced that something is now wrong with NUTRO's food.

They're pet owners like Lynn C. of Cabot, Arkansas.

"I've used NUTRO for years and never had any problems," she told us. "But my 10-year-old border collie, Boo, became sick six weeks ago. He was lethargic, lost weight, and when evaluated by a veterinarian, his liver enzymes were critical. They were elevatedoff the chart. My vet said we've got to do something.

"She put him on antibiotics and a strong amino acid, but he continued to deteriorate."

A week into Boo's treatment, a co-worker told Lynn about problems she'd read about regarding NUTRO's pet food.

"I had never dreamed it could be the food," she said. "I'm feeding all four of my dogs the food, so why all of the sudden would it affect Boo? The other three are still thriving. But they're youngerand he's the smallest dog."

Lynn did some digging and found the complaints filed by pet owners on ConsumerAffairs.com.

"I was shocked at the information that I found on NUTRO," she said. "I faxed pages and pages of this information to my veterinarian, who became alarmed and told me to stop feeding him the NUTRO."

Within days, Boo's condition improved.

"He started acting like he felt better," Lynn said. "It's amazing. He wasn't responding until I took him off the NUTRO food. Within a week, he had regained two pounds, and after two weeks, his liver enzymes were still high, but improving.

"I cannot explain why this happened all of the sudden since Boo has been eating this food for years. But I know my dog and I know it was the food."

Another pet owner in the small town of Cabot, Arkansas, who shows Westies, said her dogs experienced the same problems with NUTRO's food.

"I started using NUTRO Natural Choice for my show dogs last fall," said Judy Y., who has fed dogs NUTRO on and off for years. "With the last two bags my dogs started to lose weight and their stools were extremely soft. One litter had constant diarrhea. They were losing weight, their coats were not in the condition they should be. And after they ate, they would suck up water like they hadn't had any all day.

"The only dog I wasn't having problems with was the old dog that can only eat raw meat, no dog food at all."

Judy also noticed that one of her puppies wasn't growing.

"She was growing fine until I put her on NUTRO," Judy said. "And then it was like she just stopped growing. She looked like she had been starved and her coat looked real bad."

Judy's vet examined the dogs -- and their stools -- and didn't find any problems.

"So I said the heck with the commercial dog food and I started feeding all my dogs raw food," Judy said. "They've all bounced back. They have all gained weight and their hair is growing again."

The only exception is the puppy that had growth problems.

"My puppy is 10 months old now and her growth seems to be stunted," Judy said. "I have never had this happen in the 40 years I have been showing and breeding dogs. I'm not sure this show quality puppy will now get big enough to show or breed. It is so heart breaking to see such a good quality dog not live up to her potential because of a dog food."

Similar tales

Scores of other pet owners echo these concerns. Consider some of their pets' recent experiences with NUTRO:

Michele T. of Northridge, California: "I've been feeding my dogs NUTRO Natural Choice Senior kibble for years. Lately, the last few months, they've both had very upset tummies and very unusual and loose stools."

Rachel B. of Indianapolis, Indiana: "I have a three-year-old Poodle who I got from a rescue (group), and he's been on NUTRO Max since I've had him. Within the last few months, he has had quite a few digestive problems that his vet has not been able to figure out thus far. He has not been eating like he normal does and his stools have been incredible sporadic -- soft then hard, then soft then bloody. His appetite has been pretty bad. He'll wait to eat until he's starving because he doesn't want to eat the food. He's drinking water like he's been in the desert, and coughing and dry heaving a lot. He repeatedly tests negative for stomach parasites and we have been uncertain what the problem was until I received an e-mail about NUTRO foods from the shelter he came from. I know I will be weaning him off NUTRO immediately!"

Kelly M. of Moyock, North Carolina: "I switched my dogs to NUTRO Natural Choice Large Breed chicken and rice, thinking I was improving the quality of their food. They loved it! Unfortunately, a few days after I began feeding the new food, which I converted by mixing in increasing quantities over a week long period, both of my dogs -- a Great Dane and a Dane/Blue Tick mix -- developed watery bowels and lots of digestive activity. We took the Dane to the vet, because he exhibited symptoms first, and they performed a fecal test for both parasites and Giardia. Both were negative. When the other dog began having the same symptoms, I began to suspect the food. I placed a call to NUTRO yesterday and spoke to a customer service representative. She said they had never heard of any dogs having problems like the ones I described. And then, the next day, I found your Web site and saw the numerous complaints. I am not pleased."

Lin D. of Fresno, California: "I have three miniature pinschers and it (the NUTRO food) has affected all of them same way diarrhea, throwing up, loose stools or totally water stools. They have eaten this food for four years and never had any problems until this last bag. The thing that was interesting is when I opened the last bag and scooped out the food, it was more grainy than normal. My eight-pound girl, she's a wolf and eats everything, she kind of backed away from the food and I had to coerce her to eat. I have taken my dogs off NUTRO and they are doing fine. I also called NUTRO and spoke to a representative in consumer service. She, too, said she had not heard of any problems with the food. She is blaming the shipping and storing of the food she kind of giggled when she said it. I won't go back to that food. My dogs are much too precious to me and I am extremely fortunate I didn't lose them to a bad bag of food."

Jacki G. of Dornsife, Pennsylvania: "I recently purchased a 40 pound bag of NUTRO Natural Lamb and Rice small bites for my Weimer. We've been very happy until this last bag (dated 10 may 2009,13:38 2 a x 4 j p). Our dogs were throwing up, diarrhea as well as the usual allergy reactions. I figured they had gotten into something they shouldn't have, so I fed them brown rice and boiled ground beef to allow their bellies to settle down. The dogs got better. I resumed feeding NUTRO, with the same results. I figured the bag was somehow tainted with corn (which the Weimer is allergic to), causing the intestinal and other reactions. I purchased another food. Symptoms immediately subsided. I was determined not to waste a 40 pound bag of dog food, so I tried to mix it 50/50 with the good food. Bad Idea! Immediate return of symptoms. I called the company to report my dismay. After a 25 minute wait I spoke to a very uninterested woman, who told be to take the food back to the store for a new bag or a refund. I was shocked there was not more alarm that their food wasn't properly manufactured. I was frustrated and dumbfounded at this lack of customer service. I then Googled to see if there was anything going on with other folks. Wow, am I surprised and a little scared that I tried so long to get my Zippo to eat this food."

Leigh P. of Olmsted Falls, Ohio: "After years on NUTRO, both my cats started vomiting almost daily. I did plenty of research, feeling that I should switch their food. I will never feed commercial brands like this again. My cats are now on a raw BARF diet, which they were designed to eat, and they are thriving and healthy. My Persian cat, who lost fur four years ago from an illness, is now fluffy again after just 1 month on raw. Don't feed NUTRO or commercial brands. Now I feel guilty for donating this poison to my animal shelter."

Pet store employee

These problems don't surprise a pet store employee in California, who contacted us with concerns about NUTRO's products.

"Of the customers that come in with health issues occurring in their pets -- such as those described by the people reporting here (on your Web site), NUTRO is the only food with these problems," said the employee, who asked to remain anonymous for fear of losing her job.

"We've averaged 20 customers a week with this food issue for the last five months or so. I'm rather surprised it's continuing and that nothing is being done about it."

Foreign objects

ConsumerAffairs.com also heard from a South Carolina pet owner, who discovered what she calls "foreign" objects in her recent bags of NUTRO food.

"In two of the last five bags I've fed my dogs, I've found pieces of something that look like nylon," said Lori W. "I found one piece stuck out from one end and hooked through a piece of kibble. It was maybe one-half inch long. Most are a lot thinner."

Unidentified object found in Lori W.'s NUTRO pet food

After making these discoveries, Lori switched her six dogs to another brand of food.

Lori's pets

"I don't know, maybe that's supposed to be in there," she said. "But I'm transitioning my dogs to another food. I'm not panicked, but I got concerned after reading the other comments (on ConsumerAffairs.com). I can't deny that I found something in the food that I've never noticed before."

Lori also said one of her dogs -- an eight-year-old German Shepherd-Great Dane mix -- recently became ill after eating some NUTRO food.

"But that could be totally coincidence," she said. "Rufus has had bouts of soft stools and diarrhea since we've had him. But now I wonder if he had some sensitivity to NUTROafter we opened that last bag of NUTRO, he got sick."

She added: "I loved NUTRO and would love to continue loving it, but I'm just not comfortable with the food right now."

Service dog

She -- and other pet owners -- shouldn't feel safe feeding their dogs and cats NUTRO, warned a disabled pet owner in California.

Radio talk show host Maggie D. said her service dog -- a Pit Bull-mix named Little Maggie -- became ill a few years ago after eating NUTRO food.

"I'd been feeding her NUTRO since she was a pup," said Maggie, who hosts a radio show for people with disabilities on KUSF. "Then she suddenly started having digestive problems. She had terrible diarrhea. She'd indicate that she needed to go out, but couldn't wait. She was also lethargic and she'd drink a lot of water and then quit drinking water.

"She lost a lot of weight. She had absolutely no energy and could not pull my manual wheelchair as trained."

That meant Maggie could not leave her home.

"She's my lifeline," Maggie said of her beloved service dog. "She goes everywhere with me."

Maggie knew she had to act fast. She couldn't function -- physically or emotionally -- without Little Maggie.

She immediately switched Little Maggie from NUTRO to rice and cottage cheese.

"It took about 12 to 14 days of this diet to bring her back to normal stool formation," Maggie said. "I then would slowly re-introduce the NUTRO one nugget at a time -- more each day until she was entirely off the rice/cottage cheese diet."

But Little Maggie's condition worsened again.

"Within a month, she returned to the watery frequent stools," Maggie said. "Back and forth we went between the NUTRO lamb and rice and the rice and cottage cheese until my vet told me to put her on straight boiled chicken breasts and boiled skinned diced potato.

"After three months of the chicken/potato diet she had a shiney coat, her hair was silky once again as is her skin," Maggie added. "She had boundless energy again. She now pulls my wheelchair and stretches herself across the bed so I can pull up to a seated position and get ready to transfer to my wheelchair."

Is Maggie surprised by the recent problems dogs and cats have experienced with NUTRO products?

"No. I think they're using something different in the food they have to add fillers," she said. "I have no confidence in them."

'Look out'

Maggie decided to contact us now -- even though her problems with NUTRO occurred two years ago -- to warn other dog and cat owners about this brand of pet food.

"My message to pet owners is -- look out. If you love your animal get them off NUTRO. I would not trust the pet food industry or commercial pet food. I will never feed my animals NUTRO again."

But many pet owners stand by NUTRO and its products. And they warn consumers not to jump to conclusions based on unsubstantiated claims posted on the Internet.

"I have used NUTRO for both of my dogs and both of my cats for over two years now and I have nothing but wonderful things to say about this product," said Jennifer A. of Spokane, Washington. "The benefits are amazing and the ingredients are quality. I was a little shocked when I read some of these postings, but it will not make me quit feeding this product. I think that people need to remember that animals are like people, just because you get sick, you would not quit eating everything that you had before."

She added: "I have called NUTRO and spoken with them on numerous occasions concerning ingredients and other aspects of their food, and they have always been very nice. I find it extremely unlikely that a business would laugh at a customer on the phone, not only from a sensitivity standpoint, but also from a liability standpoint. Overall, I think NUTRO is a great product. My feeling go out to all of the people that have lost a pet, but unless you have actual proof, it is dangerous to spread false information. Get facts."

A Maryland pet owner agreed.

"We've been feeding NUTRO for years and never had a problem," Tabitha A. of Upper Marlsboro, Maryland, told us.

She advised pet owners to consider the following before criticizing a pet food:

• If you change your dog's food quickly, it's likely to get an upset stomach;

• Things can happen to any food -- people or pets. "It can get damp or bugs or be out of date, and it isn't always the manufacturers' fault."

• Even a careful company can have occasional problems. "If you have problems and can't attribute it to anything but the dog food - contact the company," she said. "They may ask for food to test. If you don't contact them, and there is a problem, they can't fix it or do a recall. I had a friend who got food with an incorrect mix and because she was diligent and sent samples, the company did a recall. She had already stopped feeding her dogs the specific batch, but she probably saved many lives."

A woman in Winnipeg who runs a dog rescue also defended NUTRO and its products.

"You had asked for bad experiences and good, but chances are you likely will not print the good ones," wrote Sally H., who runs Hull's Haven Border Collie Rescue in Winnipeg, Canada.

"All of my own dogs are on NUTRO, as are all of our rescues. We have had excellent results placing emaciated dogs on High Energy, puppies raised on NUTRO Puppy, seniors and overweight dogs on NUTRO, and we have had nothing but good results. Not only do we use the brand ourselves, but we also ask our adopters to continue to use it, as we want the best in health for our rescues," Sally said.

'100% safe'

A spokeswoman for NUTRO told us the company's products are 100 percent safe and meet all standards set by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and other federal regulators.

"NUTRO pet foods undergo rigorous quality assurance testing beginning with raw ingredients and ending with testing all finished products," said company spokeswoman Alice Nathanson. "This includes testing to confirm that no melamine, mold toxins, or pathogenic bacteria are detected in any NUTRO pet foods."

Nathanson said her company is aware of the complaints posted on the Internet about NUTRO's food.

"Some things can get posted and they are not verified," she said. "I'm not aware of any issues with the products. My dogs eat NUTRO and they have never had any problems."

Nathanson encouraged worried pet owners to contact the company directly with their concerns.

"We absolutely want to hear from customers," she said. "The safety and quality of our products is our top priority. When a consumer does have a concern with any of our products, an in-depth review of the consumer-provided samples is performed to determine if an issue does exist."

What about the complaints we heard regarding NUTRO's customer service department?

"I'm surprised to hear those comments," Nathanson said. "We take any complaint seriously and we will conduct an in-depth review if a consumer provides us with samples."

The best way to contact NUTRO, she said, is through the company's Web site: www.nutroproducts.com. Pet owners can also call NUTRO at 800-833-5330.

Veterinarians skeptical

Veterinarians we contacted about the recent problems dogs and cats have experienced with NUTRO products told us it's not uncommon for pets to have sudden bouts of gastrointestinal problems.

They also said a number of factors could be the culprit, including pet food.

"Food can cause GI upset if sudden changes are made in the type of food you're feeding," said Dr. Robert Backus, an assistant teaching professor and director of the Nestle-Purina Endowed Small Animal Nutrition Program at the University of Missouri's College of Veterinary Medicine. "And there may be some intolerance if you wean them from a previous food to another one."

He added: "As far as pet food manufacturing goes, I'm not an authority. There are many ingredients that go into these products and there could be problems with an ingredient source. There also could be problems with the formulation. And there are occasional processing problems -- maybe the food was over-processed or under processed -- which could affect GI health and pets could end up with diarrhea."

Dr. Steven Hansen with The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (ASPCA) agreed.

"There could be many causes for what you're seeing," said Hansen, a veterinary toxicologist. "Changes in diet can likely make a change in what's happening to a (pets') system. A dog may have a sensitivity to whatever he's eating even if he's eaten the food for a long time. What can happen is they develop a sensitivity to one ingredient and now their systems no longer manage the food right. That doesn't mean there is something wrong with food.

"Stress could be another factor."

Hansen, however, suspects another culprit is to blame for these recent bouts of GI problems: "A viral infection seems the mostly likely cause to me."

The ASPCA's Poison Control Center, he said, has not received any cases regarding NUTRO's food in the past six months.

"We get hundreds of cases a day and I have zero cases on NUTRO products. But given the symptoms pet owners are reporting -- they're mild gastrointestinal problems -- we might not get calls. So, I'm not aware of these problems, we have no data on them, but I'd like to know more information."

Hansen, for example, wondered if any of the pet owners fed their animals' NUTRO products with the same lot and formulation numbers.

Few pet owners had that information.

"If they have the same lot numbers, it would get my attention," Hansen said. "If they have the same formulation numbers, it may suggest there may be an ingredient that's the problem."

He and Dr. Backus encouraged pet owners whose dogs and cats have experienced these recent GI problems to contact their veterinarians.

"They need to document the problems -- especially if they are serious problems," Backus said. "And bloody diarrhea is a serious problem.

"I would also recommend that if they suspect the food is the problem, they should take a freezer bag full of it -- along with the label information that has the product's name and lot numbers -- to their vet," he added. "If the vet suspects the food is the cause, the vet should then contact the company and FDA. If there's a problem, we need to document it and get supporting lab results."

Dr. Hansen also recommended that Lori S. -- who found "foreign" objects in recent bags of NUTRO -- send samples of that food directly to the company.

"NUTRO can do a microscopic examination of the food," he said. "Maybe it is something that is normal. But if it's not, NUTRO should tell her what it is. In light of the (2007) pet food recall, I would expect pet food manufacturers to be responsive and give her an explanation for what it is."

Waiting for results

Some pet owners told us they've already sent in samples of their pet's food to NUTRO. They're now waiting for the results.

Others said they've reported their concerns to the FDA.

A few pet owners told us they hope this is all just a bad coincidence or a couple bad batches of food. Most pet owners, however, are grateful they learned about others pet' experiences with NUTRO.

"I cannot believe that a company that sells their product as safe and natural is instead injuring and killing pets," said Lynn of Arkansas. "If I had not been informed about other pet owners' experiences with NUTRO Natural Choice, my dog would be dead I would have kept feeding him the food.

"It is my hope that some consumer group or authority will begin to investigate this company and its products before other pets are affected."

More about pets ...


Scores of pets from California to South Carolina have experienced sudden and recurring bouts of diarrhea, vomiting, and other digestive problems....

Menu Foods Settles Pet Food Class Action


The company behind the largest pet food recall in United States history -- one blamed for the deaths and illnesses of thousands of dogs and cats in North America -- has agreed to settle lawsuits with pet owners.

Menu Foods Income Fund announced the tentative settlement on Tuesday.

The Canadian-based company said it could not disclose terms of the agreement, which is subject to the approval of U.S. and Canadian courts.

"It's a comprehensive settlement," Amy W. Schulman, a lawyer for Menu Foods, told MSNBC. "It would resolve all the claims." The lead attorney for pet owners agreed and said she's confident a final agreement will be reached.

Tuesday's settlement comes just a little more than a year after Menu Foods recalled 60 million containers of tainted pet food.

The company took that action after dogs and cats across the country suffered kidney problems or died after eating the company's food.

Menu Foods initially blamed the contamination on a chemical called Aminopterin, which is used as a rat poison and to treat cancer.

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) later discovered the chemical melamine in the imported wheat gluten used in the pet food. Melamine is used to make plastics.

Unapproved chemicals

In December, veterinarians blamed the dogs' and cats' deaths on the combination of two chemicals FDA officials found in the tainted pet food: melamine and cyanuric acid, which is used to chlorinate pools.

Neither chemical is approved in pet food.

Veterinarians said those two chemicals can combine and form crystals in the dogs' and cats' bodies. And those crystals can impair the animals' kidney function.

"Either one of those chemicals alone wouldn't cause these (deaths)," Dr. Barbara Powers, immediate past president of the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians (AAVLD) and director of Colorado State University's Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory, told ConsumerAffairs.com. "It has to be the combination of the two.

"So it's not melamine alone."

Pet owners in 19 states -- and Ontario -- filed dozens of lawsuits against Menu Foods in the weeks that followed the March 16, 2007, nationwide recall of dog and cat food. Those cases were consolidated in a federal court in Camden, New Jersey.

The lawsuits alleged unfair and deceptive trade practices, negligence in failing to provide adequate quality control and breach of implied and express warranties. Some consumers also claimed they suffered emotional trauma after their pets became sick or died.

Pet owners sought compensation for their veterinary bills.

Companies named in the lawsuits -- besides Menu Foods -- included Del Monte Foods Inc. of San Francisco; Nestle of Stamford, Conn.; Procter & Gamble in Cincinnati; Xuzhou Anying Biologic Technology Development Co. Ltd. in Pixian, China; and Suzhou Textile Import and Export Co. in Jiangsu, China.

Those defendants -- and Menu Foods product liability insurance company -- will cover the costs of the settlement.

Menu Foods' estimates the nationwide recall cost the company $53.8 million.

The company said pet owners with potential claims should not contact Menu Foods regarding the tentative settlement. When a final agreement is reached -- and claims are processed and approved -- the administrator of the settlement fund will notify pet owners.

U.S. District Judge Noel L. Hillman set a May 14 hearing in New Jersey to consider the settlement. A final hearing date in Canada is not yet scheduled

Indictments

Last month, two Chinese companies -- and an American importer and its owners -- were indicted for their alleged roles in intentionally manufacturing and distributing melamine-tainted wheat gluten that was used to make dog and cat food.

"When I first read about these (indictments), I was crying because I was so happy," said pet owner Carol V. of Rhode Island, whose two cats became gravely ill last February after eating melamine-tainted pet food.

"It made me feel really good that something was being done. I was shocked because I had not idea that these criminal investigations were going on. I thought they had fizzled," she said.

But Carol and other pet owners are adamant that the investigation into last year's pet food recall -- the largest in U.S. history -- must continue.

They say more companies should be held accountable for their roles in the deaths and illnesses of pets nationwide.

"I don't think the American company that imported the wheat gluten should be alone in this investigation," Carol said.

More about pets ...



Menu Foods Settles Pet Food Class Action...

Pet Owners Cheer Indictments in Toxic Pet Food Case


Pet owners across the country applauded the indictmen of two Chinese companies -- and an American importer and its owners -- for their alleged roles in intentionally manufacturing and distributing melamine-tainted wheat gluten that was used to make dog and cat food.

Pet food makers last year recalled more than 150 brands of dog and cat food contaminated with melamine, a chemical that is not approved for use in human or animal food.

Thousands of dogs and cats nationwide suffered kidney disease or died after eating the adulterated food.

"When I first read about these (indictments), I was crying because I was so happy," said pet owner Carol V. of Rhode Island, whose two cats became gravely ill last February after eating melamine-tainted pet food.

"It was one year ago yesterday that my nightmare started. It made me feel really good that something was being done. I was shocked because I had not idea that these criminal investigations were going on. I thought they had fizzled," she said.

But Carol and other pet owners are adamant that the investigation into last year's pet food recall -- the largest in U.S. history -- must continue.

They say more companies should be held accountable for their roles in the deaths and illnesses of pets nationwide.

"I don't think the American company that imported the wheat gluten should be alone in this investigation," Carol said.

Indictments announced

On Wednesday, United States Attorney John Wood announced federal grand jury indictments against:

• Xuzhou Anying Biologic Technology Development Co., LTD. (XAC), a Chinese processor of plant proteins that exports products to the United States;

• Mao Linzhun, a Chinese national who was the owner and manager of XAC;

• Suzhou Textiles, Silk, Light Industrial Products, Arts and Crafts I/E Co., LTD. (SSC), a Chinese broker used by XAC to export products to the United States;

• Chen Zhen Hao, 58, a Chinese national who was president of SSC.

The 26-count indictments specifically charged the companies and individuals with intent to defraud and mislead U.S. manufacturers -- and introducing misbranded food into interstate commerce.

In a separate but related case, Wood also announced federal indictments against:

• ChemNutra, Inc., of Las Vegas, Nevada, which buys food and food components in China and imports them into the U.S. to sell to companies in the food industry;

• Sally Qing Miller, 41, a Chinese national, who is president and controlling officer of ChemNutra, Inc,;

• Stephen S. Miller, 55, ChemNutra's owner and chief executive officer. He is married to Sally Miller.

The indictments alleged that the Millers and ChemNutra delivered melamine-tainted and misbranded food into interstate commerce.

Wire fraud conspiracy

The indictments further charged the Millers and ChemNutra with participating in a wire fraud conspiracy.

"In today's global economy, crimes that occur halfway around the world can seriously impact our lives," Wood said, adding the cases were filed in Kansas City, Missouri, because it was the port of entry for the melamine-tainted wheat gluten.

"Millions of pet owners remember the anxiety of last year's pet food recall. These indictments are the product of an investigation that began in the wake of that recall. We take seriously our responsibility to uphold the health and safety standards that protect America's food supply. Vigorous enforcement is an essential part of that effort," Wood said.

The indictments unraveled a web of fraud and deception that stretched from Nevada and China and ultimately across the country and into the homes of thousands of unsuspecting pet owners and their dogs and cats.

According to court records, more than 800 metric tons of wheat gluten was exported to the United States -- in at least 13 separate shipments -- between November 6, 2006 and February 21, 2007. Invoices reveal those shipments totaled nearly $850,000.

The indictments stated those shipments of wheat gluten were tainted with melamine and falsely labeled to avoid inspection in China.

Court records revealed that ChemNutra and the Millers received the melamine-tainted wheat gluten at a port of entry in Kansas City, Missouri, and then sold the products to their customers.

Those customers used the contaminated wheat gluten to make several brands of pet food, the indictments stated. Pet food makers use wheat gluten -- a natural protein derived from wheat or wheat flour -- as a binding agent to thicken the "gravy."

Wheat gluten

Wednesday's indictments stated that ChemNutra contracted with SSC to purchase the wheat gluten.

Under the terms of that contract, SSC agreed to provide ChemNutra with food grade wheat gluten that had a minimum protein content of 75 percent.

According to the indictments, SSC then entered into a separate contract with XAC to supply the wheat gluten needed to fulfill its contract with ChemNutra.

The indictments alleged that XAC added melamine to the wheat gluten to falsely inflate the protein content -- and meet the amounts specified in ChemNutra's contract.

It was cheaper for XAC to add melamine to the wheat gluten than to increase its actual protein content, the indictments stated.

But why didn't Chinese officials inspect the tainted wheat gluten before it left the country?

According to the indictments, SSC mislabeled the wheat gluten with a code used for products that are not subject to mandatory inspection by the country's General Administration of Quality supervision, Inspection and Quarantine (AQSIQ).

The Chinese government stated that XAC did not declare the tainted wheat gluten as a raw material for feed or as food. Instead, it falsely identified the wheat gluten as another product one that was not subject to inspection.

Wednesday's indictments further alleged that SCC provided ChemNutra and the Millers with documents that used the inaccurate product code. This is where the wire fraud conspiracy charge comes into play.

Citing e-mail messages, the indictments alleged that Sally Miller -- because of her background and training -- knew the wheat gluten would not be subject to inspections in China because the shipments were mislabeled with that product code.

Federal authorities said Sally Miller holds an engineering degree in food chemistry from Hangzhou University in China and has more than 10 years of work experience in China primarily as a purchasing manager for United States companies.

The indictments call for fines and jail time for executives at the Chinese companies -- and for Millers.

Wrongdoing denied

The Millers on Wednesday denied any wrongdoing.

"(They) deny the allegations by the Justice Department in the strongest of terms and look forward to the opportunity to prove their innocence at trial," a spokesman for ChemNutra told reporters. "Neither Mr. nor Mrs. Miller had any intent to defraud or knowledge of any wrongdoing."

In a written statement, the company also said that federal authorities did not accuse the Millers of knowing the wheat gluten was tainted with melamine.

"Although Mr. and Mrs. Miller strongly deny any intent to defraud or knowledge of wrongdoing, the government does not allege that Mr. and Mrs. Miller knew of the presence of melamine or any other substance that would cause death or injury to animals," the statement read. "The Millers unequivocally support the government pursuing those with knowledge of the dangerous contaminants."

The company, however, said the Millers were "deeply bothered by the government's failure to make these important distinctions in its press release related to their indictments."

A manager at Suzhou Textiles told The New York Times the company's owner was on vacation. He also said the company no longer ships food to the United States.

During a press conference on Wednesday, Wood acknowledged that it might be difficult to bring the Chinese defendants to the United States for trail.

The U.S. does not have an extradition treaty with China.

Wood, however, said his office will send arrest warrants for the Chinese defendants to international authorities action that makes it possible for the men to be detained if they travel to a country with a U.S. extradition treaty.

Wood also told reporters that Wednesday's indictments are accusations and not evidence of guilt.

The charges, he added, come on the heels of a long investigation by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration Office of Criminal Investigation and U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement.

Pet owners respond

Meanwhile, pet owners hope additional charges will be filed in connection with the pet food nightmare.

"I think this is the tip of the iceberg and more indictments will come against other companies," said pet owner Doris B. of Georgia. "I think Menu Foods should face federal charges, too."

Menu Foods is the Canadian-based company at the heart of last year's pet food recall.

On March 16, 2007, Menu pulled more than 60 million containers of melamine-tainted dog and cat food off store shelves nationwide.

But weeks earlier, the company conducted routine feeding trials on pet food made with the tainted wheat gluten ChemNutra imported from China.

Menu Foods acknowledged that nine animals died during those trials.

The company, however, didn't report those deaths -- or five others that it learned about -- to the FDA until March 15, 2007.

"Think how many animals would have been saved if Menu Foods would have come out sooner -- and said they had a problem -- that animals were becoming sick and dying after eating their food," said pet owner Carol V. of Rhode Island. "Those feeding trials were between February 20-26 and these animals were dying, yet Menu Foods said nothing until March 15."

Canadian author Ann Martin, who has researched the pet food industry for years, agreed that U.S. authorities should investigate and perhaps charge -- Menu Foods and other pet food companies in connection with last year's recall.

"Menu Foods should have been part of this indictment as they, along with every other pet food company, neglect to test the raw ingredients that are being used in the foods they produce," Martin told ConsumerAffairs.com. "Menu knew weeks before the recall that there was a problem, yet chose to blame pet owner's for the illnesses and carried on with their shipping of the toxic pet food."

Do Wednesday's indictments represent justice for the pets that died after eating the tainted food?

Not at all, Martin said.

"These indictments are no justice for the thousands of dogs and cats that suffered and died because of this contamination," said the author of "Foods Pet Die For," and "Protect Your Pets."

"The only justice would be to put an end to the unethical practices that are perpetrated within this industry."

More about pets ...



Pet Owners Cheer Indictments in Toxic Pet Food Case...

Menu Foods Denies Acetaminophen Found in its Cat Food


Menu Foods -- in a brief message that appeared on its Web site this week -- says a University of California laboratory did not find acetaminophen in samples of Special Kitty food it recently tested.

Menu Foods statement infuriated the Rhode Island pet owner who is at the center of Menus decision to test this brand of cat food for acetaminophen.

I dont trust them and I think theyre hiding something, says Carol V., whose two cats nearly died earlier this year after eating Special Kitty food.

Carol purchased the cat food in February -- one month before Menu Foods recalled more than 60 million containers of tainted dog and cat food. The recall included Special Kitty food.

Melamine

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) initially blamed the contamination -- and the subsequent kidney problems and deaths of thousands of pets nationwide -- on the chemical melamine.

But earlier this month, veterinarians said the combination of two chemicals the FDA found in the tainted food -- melamine and cyanuric acid -- caused the animals deaths.

Melamine is used to make plastic. Cyanuric acid is used to chlorinate pools. Neither is approved for use in pet food.

Veterinarians said those two chemicals -- which FDA officials discovered in the imported wheat gluten and rice protein concentrated used to make pet food -- can combine and form crystals in the animals bodies. And those crystals can impair the animals kidney function.

Agrees to test

Menu Foods, however, agreed in October to test Special Kitty food specifically for acetaminophen.

That action came in response to a ConsumerAffairs.com story that revealed a Texas laboratory found the pain killer in samples of Special Kitty that Carol had feed her cats -- Smudge and Jessica.

Test results revealed that ExperTox Analytical Laboratory detected acetaminophen (pdf file) in a composite of three flavors of Special Kitty food - Special Kitty with beef and gravy, Special Kitty mixed grill in gravy, and Special Kitty with turkey and giblets in gravy.

ExperTox also found melamine in the samples of Carols Special Kitty food. It did not, however, detect any cyanuric acid.

The acetaminophen findings added to a growing number of cases in which toxicologists at ExperTox had discovered the over-the-counter pain medicine in samples of dog or cat food.

On Monday, Menu Foods refuted all of ExperTox findings regarding acetaminophen in its products.

The company posted this statement at the bottom of its Web site: Earlier this year, an individual suggested that acetaminophen was present in certain products manufactured by Menu when a single private laboratory purported to find acetaminophen in products he had tested. Those suggestions and the results of that single laboratory were refuted at the time by tests conducted by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. The California Animal Health and Food Safety Laboratory at the University of California Davis (UC Davis) also found no traces of acetaminophen in the products at issue in tests commissioned by Menu.

The statement continued and specifically addressed ExperToxs findings of acetaminophen in Carols cat food: The acetaminophen claims were re-cycled in October 2007 when that same private laboratory purported to find acetaminophen in another Menu-produced product that was part of the pet food recall in March 2007. Despite the previous findings and with the goal of alleviating any remaining public concern, Menu commissioned UC Davis to perform tests on the products that were the subject of the new claim. As with the prior tests conducted by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and UC Davis, the most recent tests by UC Davis also found no traces of acetaminophen.

Outraged

Carol is outraged by what she calls Menus cold response.

That company poisoned my animals and they have the gall to refer to my lab results as a recycled claim, she told us late Monday. Thats a slap in the face.

This company made money off my animals for years and now theyve poisoned my pets. How dare they belittle them . . . its so insulting.

Carol also questioned the validity of Menus test results.

The company has never called me so how do they know they tested the right food the one that has same lot, style, and UPC code as my Special Kitty. she says. And it took seven weeks for this to come out, and then they (Menu) dont post their findings. I posted my findings from ExperTox.

Hired gun?

Carol further questioned Menus decision to hire UC Davis.

UC-Davis gets a half-a-million dollars in grants from the pet food industry, she says. Why are they using them? Why not use a lab that has nothing to do with the pet food industry?

But Dr. Bob Poppenga, professor of veterinary toxicology at UC Davis, said the California Animal Health and Food Safety Laboratory does not receive any funding from the pet food industry.

And all its test results are objective and not influenced by any outside sources.

The lab is independent, Dr. Poppenga told us on Thursday. It does not receive a penny from the pet food industry. The funding for the lab comes from the state. We also get some federal grants.

He added: Other entities at UC-Davis (the nutrition program and research) may get funding from the pet food industry. And thats why I think some of these misconceptions (about the lab) may occur.

The lab, however, does have clients in the pet food industry including Menu Foods.

We do testing for them that they cannot get done anywhere else, Dr. Poppenga said. And there is a fee we charge them.

Out-of-state clients like Menu Foods are charged a higher fee than those from California, he said.

Thats because the taxpayers of California support us, Dr. Poppenga said. The clients in the state of California are charged less.

What about the labs results on the Special Kitty food?

I cant discuss those because Menu Foods is our client, Dr. Poppenga said.

The company responds

In a written statement to ConsumerAffairs.com, Menu Foods said it will not publicly disclose the lab results on the Special Kitty food it tested.

Menu Foods has provided a summary of the findings on its website, the company wrote.

Menu Foods also said ExperToxs results contained the date and time codes of the Special Kitty food it tested. Thats how the company knew which cat food to analyze.

The California Animal Health and Food Safety Laboratory at the University of California Davis ("UC Davis") tested products with date and time codes in close proximity to those identified in the ExperTox (report) - ensuring the products tested by UC Davis were manufactured and filled from the same ingredient sources as those identified in the ExperTox report, the company said.

The ExperTox analysis was a composite of three different products manufactured on three different days. UC Davis' analysis was conducted on the individual products of the ExperTox composite analysis.

Menu Foods added: Acetaminophen was non-detectable in all three samples.

The company said it has not contacted Carol about her cat food because of a federal court order issued in May.

This court order prohibits Menu Foods from contacting the consumer regarding the pet food she had tested and the test results she obtained, UC Davis' test results, any pet food in her possession, and any other information related to her claim, the company wrote.

Carol, however, has not filed a claim -- or taken any legal action -- against Menu Foods.

We also asked the company why it still had recalled pet food in its possession and how it normally disposes these products.

Menu Foods is a defendant in ongoing litigation related to the recall, and currently cannot dispose of recalled product, the company wrote. Prior to the March recall, Menu has never before been involved in a food safety recall and as such, has no experience in 'doing' anything with its recalled product.

"At such time as Menu Foods is permitted to dispose of the product recalled this spring, it will do so in accordance with FDA guidelines, it said.

Meanwhile, Carol continues searching for answers about what made her cats so sick. She recently hired another lab to test samples of the Special Kitty food -- which she has stored in her freezer -- for acetaminophen and other toxins.

Time, however, is not on her side.

Jessica is not doing well, she told us Monday. Shes starting to fail. She is probably not going to survive another monthits like were revisiting this all over again.

Jessica first became sick in mid-February when Carol detected a strange odor on the cats breath.

It smelled uremic, like a kidney dialysis patient, Carol recalled. We also noticed that Jessica was outside drinking water from a melting puddle. I remember commenting that wed never seen either cat drink before. But Jessica was so desperate for water that she was drinking from a puddle outside.

And then we noticed that she couldnt stand on her own.

Carol rushed the 15-year-old Tabby cat to the familys veterinarian.

He did a urinalysis and discovered her kidneys were failing, Carol said. We thought we would have to euthanize her. But our vet said that because Jessica seemed fine the day before, he wanted to presume this was something he could treat.

For the next few days, Jessica received fluids, potassium supplements, the heartburn medicine Pepcid AC, and an antibiotic.

We decided that if this didnt workif she was sufferingwe wouldnt continue with the treatment, Carol said. But Jessicas condition slowly improved.

Her back legs were getting stronger and she seemed to be getting better. So we continued giving her more fluids and sticking with this same treatment program.

Force-feeding

Carols vet also emphasized the importance of getting Jessica to eat.

So I tried to force-feed her the Special Kitty food, Carol said, adding this occurred a few weeks before Menu Foods announced its recall. Jessica refused. I even poured tuna fish oil on the Special Kitty food to entice her to eat, but she walked away.

Smudge, however, continued to gobble up the Special Kitty food. And on March 12 -- four days before Menu Foods announced its recall -- the Calico cat suddenly became seriously ill.

She could hardly stand up, she was staggering, and her breath smelled foul, Carol said. I thought that she had whatever Jessica hadthat maybe it was a virus.

But Carols vet discovered another -- much more serious -- problem. Smudge was in renal failure.

He said she was much worse than Jessica was and he didnt think that shed last through the day, Carol said. He said it looked like shed gotten into some antifreeze. But he did a test and that proved it wasnt antifreeze poisoning. The family took aggressive measures to save the 13-year-old cat. They authorized their vet to follow the same protocol he used to treat Jessica.

Slowly, Smudge started to improve.

Our vet said he didnt know what was going on with Smudge, Carol said. He was baffled. And I think I asked him if it could be something we were feeding the cats.

Suspicions confirmed

Carols suspicious were confirmed a few days later.

I was watching the news and heard about Menu Foods recall and that the food was causing renal failure in pets.

Carol said she immediately contacted Menu Foods, but the company didnt respond.

All Menu Foods was publicly telling pet owners to do was save their receipts. But this wasnt about money. It was about saving our pets and nothing was happening.

Carol also contacted the FDA -- several times.

I offered to give the FDA my cats food, but they said they didnt want it. I told them I have the food thats on the recall list and I also have two really sick cats. I begged and pleaded with them to test my food, but they didnt want it.

Apathy at FDA

At one point, an FDA employee even chastised Carol for calling.

The person who answered the phone said why are you calling me about this. What really bothered me was how these agencies could be reporting information about the pet food recall if they werent taking any information -- at least not from me. I didnt expect this from the people who supposedly were the investigators on this.

The FDA finally returned Carols calls but only after she sent numerous e-mails and contacted Rhode Island Senator Sheldon Whitehouse.

Five minutes after contacting the Senators office, I received a call from a woman at the FDA, Carol said. She told me my previous messages apparently didnt get through.

This whole experience has been so frustrating. Its like being on a merry-go-round and I keep going to back to square one. And all I really wanted was for someone to test my cats food.

That someone turned out to be The Pet Food Products Safety Alliance, a new organization created to raise public awareness of pet food safety issues.

That group hired ExperTox to test Carols food. Spokesman Don Earl called the labs findings significant for two reasons.

To my knowledge, this is the first time acetaminophen has been detected in the presence of melamine, said Earl, who has extensively researched this issue since his cat, Chuckles, died in January. Chuckles went into kidney failure after eating Pet Pride cat food that wasnt included in the recall.

ExperToxs results also added to the growing list of pet foods that have recently tested positive for acetaminophen, including:

• About a half-dozen samples of pet food tested in May. ExperTox did not disclose the brands of those foods because of a confidentiality agreement. But Earl confirmed that two of those samples were Menu Foods Pet Pride "Turkey and Giblets Dinner" and Pet Pride "Mixed Grill that he sent to the lab for analysis. Menu Foods and the FDA disputed ExperToxs findings. But we learned the FDA couldnt confirm it tested the same lots and brands in which ExperTox detected the pain medication.

• A sample of pet food -- identified as CANIDAE dog food. ExperTox, however, said the sample arrived in a Ziploc bag and it could not confirm the pet food was a CANIDAE product. The lab's customer, who was not identified because of a confidentiality agreement, listed the sample as CANIDAE pet food on ExperToxs forms. CANIDAE denied its products contain acetaminophen, but said it would test samples of its food for the painkiller.

ConsumerAffairs.com asked the FDA what action the agency will take in response to ExperToxs findings of acetaminophen in Carols cat food. A spokeswoman told us the agency does not comment on pending legislation, litigation, or citizen petitions.

The FDA, however, suggested that Carol contact the agencys Consumer Complaint Coordinator about getting her food tested.

Carol took that action in October and said the FDA initially responded. But she hasnt heard from that agency in more than six weeks.

Battling with the FDA and Menu Foods, however, arent Carols immediate concerns right now.

Shes focused on keeping Jessica comfortable. Like I said, Jessica is probably not going to survive another month.



Menu Foods Denies Acetaminophen Found in its Cat Food...

Article Image

Veterinarians Solve Pet Food Death Puzzle


Veterinarians say the mystery behind the deaths of dogs and cats across the country that ate tainted pet food earlier this year has been solved.

The veterinarians now blame the deaths on the combination of two chemicals the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) found in the more than 60 million containers of recalled pet food: melamine and cyanuric acid.

Melamine is used to make plastic. Cyanuric acid is used to chlorinate pools. Neither is approved for use in pet food.

Those two chemicals -- which FDA officials discovered in the imported wheat gluten and rice protein concentrated use to make pet food -- can combine and form crystals in the animals bodies, the veterinarians say.

And those crystals can impair the animals kidney function.

Either one of those chemicals alone wouldnt cause these (deaths), Dr. Barbara Powers, immediate past president of the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians (AAVLD) and director of Colorado State Universitys Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory, told us on Friday. It has to be the combination of the two.

So its not melamine alone.

Dr. Powers comments support a theory raised earlier this year by the University of Guelphs Animal Health Laboratory in Ontario about what might have caused pets to die after eating the tainted food.

Tests conducted at the university revealed that melamine and cyanuric acid could react to form crystals that block kidney function.

When the study came out in May, John Melicherik, director of analytical services for Guelph's laboratory services, told The Toronto Star: "This is a piece of the puzzle, a significant finding. We have found these crystals in cats that have suffered renal failure."

Story continues below video

Thousands of deaths


Dr. Barbara Powers

Since Menu Foods announced its massive pet food recall in March, the FDA has received 17,000 complaints from consumers who said their dogs or cats suffered kidney problems or died after eating the tainted food. FDA officials, however, only confirmed 16 pet-food related deaths.

In the months that followed Menus recall, ConsumerAffairs.com heard from scores of pet owners who said their dogs or cats became seriously ill or died after eating the adulterated food. Many had lost two, three or even more pets.

And were still getting complaints.

Some consumers even hired a private laboratory in Texas to analyze their pets food for possible toxins. That facility is Expertox Analytical Laboratory, which has confirmed to us that it detected the pain killer acetaminophen in some samples of pet food.

But Dr. Powers downplayed Expertoxs findings.

Thats not an AAVLD lab and acetaminophen has never been confirmed (in pet food) by other labs, she said. Thats a not a valid finding.

Meanwhile, veterinarians now have a better idea of just how many dogs and cats died after eating the contaminated pet food.

Dr. Powers told us that a recently released survey by the AAVLD found the number of confirmed deaths linked to the tainted pet food -- ones that met specific criteria for kidney failure -- now stands at 226.

Of those deaths, 143 were cats and 83 were dogs.

But there absolutely could be more deaths from the tainted pet food, Dr. Powers said, adding veterinarians across the country participated in the organizations survey. This survey didnt catch all the deaths that happened. In order to be counted in our survey, you had to meet certain criteria.

She added: If someone had a pet that died and they buried it in their background, they werent eligible for our survey. We had to have confirmed exposure to the recalled pet food, proof of toxicity, and clinical signs of renal failure. So this is only a percentage of the deaths that are out there. Theres no way to guess how many pets were affected.

More cats died

The AAVLDs Pet Food-Induced Nephrotoxicity" survey also discovered that more cats than dogs became sick or died after eating the tainted food.

We dont know why it affected cats more than dogs, Dr. Powers said. It could very well have to do with the animals size -- cats are smaller than dogs. Or it could be the animals metabolism. Cats have a different metabolism than dogs.

What about smaller dogs?

We broke the breeds down into small, medium, and large and discovered that small dogs were affected more by the tainted pet food, Dr. Powers said. So there is certainly a size factor there.

Her colleague, Dr. Wilson Rumbeiha, associate professor at the Michigan State University Diagnostic Center for Population and Animal Health, agreed.

Even among dogs, small- to medium-size dogs were affected the most, he said.

The AAVLDs voluntary survey included more than 550 cases nationwide, but only 347 met its specific criteria for kidney failure caused by the tainted food, Dr. Powers said.

The impetus for us to do this survey was because we as association members started seeing these cases (earlier this year) showing up in our labs across the country. We have a listserv where we chat among ourselves and we were talking about us seeing all these deaths in dogs and cats. I was president of the association at the time and said we need to do a survey and see whats going on and what the extent of this problem is. Thats how this got started.

Quicker response needed

The organizations next goal, she said, is to obtain federal funding that would allow labs across the country to respond more quickly if theres another tainted pet food or other type of toxicological crisis.

Its hard to prevent something like this from happening again, she said. Im sure there are now safeguards in place, but you cant check for every toxin under sun. And who would have ever thought to screen for melamine and cyanuric acid. Those were chemicals that werent on anyones radar.



Veterinarians Solve Pet Food Death Puzzle...

Article Image

Menu Foods Agrees to Test for Pain Killer in its Cat Food

By Lisa Wade McCormick
ConsumerAffairs.com

October 24, 2007
Menu Foods will test samples of its Special Kitty food for the pain killer acetaminophen, ConsumerAffairs.com has learned.

The action comes on the heels of a ConsumerAffairs.com report that revealed ExperTox Analytical Laboratory found the over-the-counter pain medication in samples of Special Kitty food it tested earlier this month.

ExperTox detected the acetaminophen in a composite of three flavors of Special Kitty food - Special Kitty with beef and gravy, Special Kitty mixed grill in gravy, and Special Kitty with turkey and giblets in gravy. Lab report (pdf file)

The findings added to the growing number of cases in which toxicologists at the Texas-based lab have discovered the pain medicine in samples of dog or cat food.

The latest findings came in samples of Special Kitty food that a Rhode Island pet owner purchased in February one month before Menu Foods recalled more than 60 million containers of tainted dog and cat food.

FDA blames melamine

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) blamed the contamination -- and the subsequent kidney problems and deaths of thousands of pets nationwide -- on the chemical melamine.

ExperTox also found that chemical in the Special Kitty food it tested.

Rhode Island pet owner Carol V. told us last week that her two cats -- Jessica and Smudge -- almost died after eating the Special Kitty food.

To say the food made them sick is an understatement, she said, adding the cat food was included in Menus recall. It nearly killed them.

Carol said she repeatedly contacted Menu Foods and the FDA to test her cats food, which she stored in the original, unopened packages in her freezer.

Both refused.

But a new organization called The Pet Food Products Safety Alliance heard about Carols sick cats and paid ExperTox to test the Special Kitty food.

Those test results -- and our story -- apparently captured Menu Foods attention. The company confirmed this week that it will test samples of Special Kitty food specifically for acetaminophen.

Menu Foods is accumulating samples of the products we understand were used in the composite sample she (Carol) tested at ExperTox and we will undertake our own tests on these products as soon as possible, the company said in a written statement sent to ConsumerAffairs.com. Based on the information available, we understand that the product the consumer supplied for testing was part of the recall of melamine-contaminated products earlier this year.

Menu Foods posted a similar statement on its Web site.

A victory

Carol's Cats

Jessica
Smudge sick
Smudge recovered
Carol cautiously applauded the pet food companys action.

It is a victory. I wanted further investigation on this and were getting that.

But she added: Its a baby-step as long as they (Menu Foods) use an independent lab -- one thats not connected to a pet food company. They also need to make sure the lab has state-of-the-art technology. This is a step in the right direction if Menu Foods makes its test results public. Those of us getting our food tested are out in the open. I want to feel that same thing from Menu Foods.

Carol also questioned where the company was getting its samples of Special Kitty food.

I thought the company was supposed to destroy all this (recalled) food, she said. I think Menu Food should have at least contacted me, but they havent. You would think they would want samples from the same batch. What they really need to do is test ExperToxs samples.

Menu Foods said a court order prevented company officials from communicating with Carol about her claim.

But ExperToxs lab results, Carol said, have nothing to do with her requests for reimbursement of the more than $2,000 shes spent treating Jessica and Smudge.

Carol, who is not involved in any litigation against Menu Foods, wants to ensure the company tests the correct samples of cat foods the ones that made her cats seriously ill.

As we reported last week, ExperToxs test results gave Carol some insight into why her healthy cats suddenly became so sick after eating the Special Kitty food.

I expected the lab to find melamine, the veteran X-ray technician. But from what Ive read, melamine isnt too harmful and isnt toxic unless it reacts with cyanuric acid. But the lab didnt find cyanuric acid in the food.

Finding acetaminophen in the cat food, she said, could explain Jessicas and Smudges health problems. The popular pain killer can be toxic to cats, according to veterinarians.

It just floored me that there was acetaminophen in the food I feed my cats, Carol told us last week. How can you explain acetaminophen in my cats food? I sent the food in the original, unopened pouches.

But finding the acetaminophen in there also makes perfect sense after seeing what theyve gone through, she added. I really thought both of them were going to die.

The first signs of problems surfaced in mid-February when Carol detected a strange odor on Jessicas breath.

It smelled uremic, like a kidney dialysis patient, Carol recalled. We also noticed that Jessica was outside drinking water from a melting puddle. I remember commenting that wed never seen either cat drink before. But Jessica was so desperate for water that she was drinking from a puddle outside.

And then we noticed that she couldnt stand on her own.

Carol rushed the 15-year-old Tabby cat to the familys veterinarian.

He did a urinalysis and discovered her kidneys were failing, Carol said. We thought we would have to euthanize her. But our vet said that because Jessica shed seemed fine the day before, he wanted to presume this was something he could treat.

For the next few days, Jessica received fluids, potassium supplements, the heartburn medicine Pepcid AC, and an antibiotic.

We decided that if this didnt workif she was sufferingwe wouldnt continue with the treatment, Carol said. But Jessicas condition slowly improved.

Her back legs were getting stronger and she seemed to be getting better. So we continued giving her more fluids and sticking with this same treatment program.

Carols vet also emphasized the importance of getting Jessica to eat.

So I tried to force fed her the Special Kitty food, Carol said, adding this occurred a few weeks before Menu Foods announced its recall. Jessica refused. I even poured tuna fish oil on the Special Kitty food to entice her to eat, but she walked away.

Smudge, however, continued to gobble up the Special Kitty food.

And on March 12 -- four days before Menu Foods announced its recall -- the Calico cat suddenly became seriously ill.

She could hardly stand up, she was staggering, and her breath smelled foul, Carol said. I thought that she had whatever Jessica hadthat maybe it was a virus.

But Carols vet discovered another -- much more serious -- problem. Smudge was in renal failure.

He said she was much worse than Jessica was and he didnt think that shed last through the day, Carol said. He said it looked like shed gotten into some antifreeze. But he did a test and that proved it wasnt antifreeze poisoning.

The family took aggressive measures to save the 13-year-old cat. They authorized their vet to follow the same protocol he used to treat Jessica. Slowly, Smudge started to improve.

Our vet said he didnt know what was going on with Smudge, Carol said. He was baffled. And I think I asked him if it could be something we were feeding the cats.

Stiffed by Menu, FDA

I was watching the news and heard about Menu Foods recall and that the food was causing renal failure in pets. Carol said she immediately contacted Menu Foods, but the company didnt respond.

All Menu Foods was publicly telling pet owners to do was save their receipts. But this wasnt about money. It was about saving our pets and nothing was happening.

Carol also contacted the FDA--several times.

I offered to give the FDA my cats food, but they said they didnt want it. I told them I have the food thats on the recall list and I also have two really sick cats. I begged and pleaded them to test my food, but they didnt want it.

At one point, an FDA employee even chastised Carol for calling.

The person who answered the phone said why are you calling me about this. What really bothered me was how these agencies could be reporting information about the pet food recall if they werent taking any information -- at least not from me. I didnt expect this from the people who supposedly were the investigators on this.

The FDA finally returned Carols calls but only after she sent numerous e-mails and contacted Rhode Island Senator Sheldon Whitehouse.

Five minutes after contacting the Senators office, I received a call from a woman at the FDA, Carol said. She told me my previous messages apparently didnt get through.

This whole experience has been so frustrating. Its like being on a merry-go-round and I keep going to back to square one. And all I really wanted was for someone to test my cats food.

New Organization Responds

A new organization called The Pet Food Products Safety Alliance answered Carols plea.

That organization -- created to raise public awareness of pet food safety issues paid ExperTox to test Carols cat food. A representative with the group, Don Earl, learned about Carols situation on an Internet Web site.

Don asked me if I would send him the cats food to be tested and I told him Id be happy to, Carol said, adding shed saved several unopened pouches of Special Kitty since March and stored the food in her freezer. Don wanted to know which flavor was worse and I said I feed my cats every flavor. Thats why he wanted three different flavors. He knew the results would be scrutinized.

ExperToxs results on the Special Kitty food are significant for two reasons, Earl said.

To my knowledge, this is the first time acetaminophen has been detected in the presence of melamine.

Red herring

The tests also cast doubt on the theory that melamine is the culprit behind the pet food recall, he said.

(These tests) add significantly to the body of evidence that melamine has been used by the pet food companies as a red herring to cover up the actual toxin that killed an estimated quarter of a million pets, said Earl, who has extensively researched this issue since his cat, Chuckles, died in January. Chuckles went into kidney failure after eating Pet Pride cat food that wasnt included in the recall.

Earl said his research -- and these latest finding by ExperTox -- have convinced him that another toxic caused the illnesses and deaths in pets nationwide.

The scientific data, he said, just doesnt support the melamine theory.

Melamine is less toxic than common table salt and couldn't possibly account for the kidney failure epidemic in affected pets, he said.

ExperToxs latest results also add to the growing list of pet foods that have recently tested positive for acetaminophen, including:


  • About a half-dozen samples of pet food tested in May. ExperTox did not disclose the brands of those foods because of a confidentiality agreement. But Earl confirmed that two of those samples were Menu Foods Pet Pride "Turkey and Giblets Dinner" and Pet Pride "Mixed Grill that he sent to the lab for analysis. The FDA disputed ExperToxs findings, but we discovered the FDA could not confirm it tested the same lots and brands in which ExperTox detected the pain medication;

  • A sample of pet food -- identified as CANIDAE dog food. ExperTox, however, said the sample arrived in a Ziploc bag and it could not confirm the pet food was a CANIDAE product. The lab's customer, who was not identified because of a confidentiality agreement, listed the sample as CANIDAE pet food on ExperToxs forms. CANIDAE denied its products contain acetaminophen, but said it would test samples of its food for the painkiller.

ExperToxs newest findings demand further investigation, Carol said.

I know some people have criticized ExperTox, but I trust them. I know how hard it is for a lab to stay accredited. I dont think the FDA can continue to turn its head on acetaminophen.

FDA Mum

Carol's Cat Food





But will the FDA unleash a new investigation of possible toxins in the tainted pet food in the wake of ExperToxs latest findings?

Will it specifically look for acetaminophen in pet food?

An FDA spokeswoman told us the agency does not comment on pending legislation, litigation, or citizen petitions.

What about the run-around Carol received trying to get some answers from the FDA and get that agency to test her cats food?

The FDA spokeswoman suggested Carol contact the FDAs Consumer Complaint Coordinator. Carol took that action on Tuesday and said the FDA now seems interested in the Special Kitty food.

The FDA coordinator took very detailed information from me, Carol said, adding the representative wanted her cats medical records and additional information about their food. I think from my tone she knew that I have no intention of keeping this quiet.

In the meantime, Carol said her cats are getting better each day.

Jessica is 90 percent of her sassy self, she said. And Smudge just started eating on her own at the end of June. We were feeding her in a syringe for months. We were determined that if she survived this in the beginning, she had a right to make a full recovery.

Pet owners also have a right not to worry every time they feed their dogs or cats, Carol said.

I dont want something like this to happen again. My cats dont have the reserves to survive even one more bite of bad food.

The FDA cannot dismiss this as they have with all the other tests (that detected) acetaminophen.



Menu Foods Agrees to Test for Pain Killer in its Cat Food...

Article Image

Lab Tests Again Find Acetaminophen in Pet Food


Its happened again. New laboratory tests have detected the pain killer acetaminophen in yet another brand of pet food, ConsumerAffairs.com has learned.

These results add to the growing number of cases in which toxicologists at ExperTox Analytical Laboratories in Texas have detected the over-the-counter pain medicine in dog or cat food.

Carol's Cat Food



The latest findings (pdf file) came in a composite of three flavors of Menu Foods Special Kitty food -- Special Kitty with beef and gravy, Special Kitty mixed grill in gravy, and Special Kitty with turkey & giblets in gravy.

The tests performed by ExperTox earlier this month also detected another toxin in the foods: melamine. Thats the chemical that triggered Menu Foods massive recall in March of more than 60 million containers of pet food.

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) found the melamine in the wheat gluten imported from China, which pet food companies used to make their products. Thousands of dogs and cats nationwide suffered kidney problems or died after eating the tainted pet food.

ConsumerAffairs.com learned a Rhode Island pet owner bought the Special Kitty food in February one month before Menu announced its nationwide recall. Pet owner Carol V. said her two cats -- Jessica and Smudge -- nearly died after eating the tainted food.

To say the food made them sick is an understatement, she told us. It nearly killed them.

Now, shes beginning to understand why. ExperToxs lab results, she said, give her some insight into what made her cats so sick.

Not just melamine

Carol's Cats

Jessica
Smudge sick
Smudge recovered

I expected the lab to find melamine, said Carol, who worked as an X-ray technician for years. But from what Ive read, melamine isnt too harmful and isnt toxic unless it reacts with cyanuric acid. But the lab didnt find cyanuric acid in the food.

The acetaminophen in the cat food, however, may explain Jessicas and Smudges problems. The popular pain killer can be toxic to cats, according to veterinarians.

It just floored me that there was acetaminophen in the food I feed my cats, said Carol. How can you explain acetaminophen in my cats food? I sent the food in the original, unopened pouches.

But finding the acetaminophen in there also makes perfect sense after seeing what theyve gone through, she adds. I really thought both of them were going to die.

The first signs of problems surfaced in mid-February when Carol detected a strange odor on Jessicas breath.

It smelled uremic, like a kidney dialysis patient, Carol recalled. We also noticed that Jessica was outside drinking water from a melting puddle. I remember commenting that wed never seen either cat drink before. But Jessica was so desperate for water that she was drinking from a puddle outside.

And then we noticed that she couldnt stand on her own.

Kidneys failing

Carol rushed the 15-year-old Tabby cat to the familys veterinarian.

He did a urinalysis and discovered her kidneys were failing, Carol said. We thought we would have to euthanize her. But our vet said that because Jessica shed seemed fine the day before, he wanted to presume this was something he could treat.

For the next few days, Jessica received fluids, potassium supplements, the heartburn medicine Pepcid AC, and an antibiotic.

We decided that if this didnt workif she was sufferingwe wouldnt continue with the treatment, Carol said.

But Jessicas condition slowly improved.

Her back legs were getting stronger and she seemed to be getting better. So we continued giving her more fluids and sticking with this same treatment program.

Carols vet also emphasized the importance of getting Jessica to eat.

So I tried to force fed her the Special Kitty food, Carol said, adding this occurred a few weeks before Menu Foods announced its recall. Jessica refused. I even poured tuna fish oil on the Special Kitty food to entice her to eat, but she walked away.

Smudge, however, continued to gobble up the Special Kitty food.

And on March 12 -- four days before Menu Foods announced its recall the Calico cat suddenly became seriously ill.

She could hardly stand up, she was staggering, and her breath smelled foul, Carol said. I thought that she had whatever Jessica hadthat maybe it was a virus.

Renal failure

But Carols vet discovered another -- much more serious -- problem. Smudge was in renal failure.

He said she was much worse than Jessica was and he didnt think that shed last through the day, Carol said. He said it looked like shed gotten into some antifreeze. But he did a test and that proved it wasnt antifreeze poisoning.

The family took aggressive measures to save the 13-year-old cat. They authorized their vet to follow the same protocol he used to treat Jessica.

Slowly, Smudge started to improve.

Our vet said he didnt know what was going on with Smudge, Carol said. He was baffled. And I think I asked him if it could be something we were feeding the cats.

Carols suspicious were confirmed a few days later.

Stiffed by Menu, FDA

I was watching the news and heard about Menu Foods recall and that the food was causing renal failure in pets. Carol said she immediately contacted Menu Foods, but the company didnt respond.

All Menu Foods was publicly telling pet owners to do was save their receipts. But this wasnt about money. It was about saving our pets and nothing was happening.

Carol also contacted the FDA--several times.

I offered to give the FDA my cats food, but they said they didnt want it. I told them I have the food thats on the recall list and I also have two really sick cats. I begged and pleaded them to test my food, but they didnt want it.

At one point, an FDA employee even chastised Carol for calling.

The person who answered the phone said why are you calling me about this. What really bothered me was how these agencies could be reporting information about the pet food recall if they werent taking any information -- at least not from me. I didnt expect this from the people who supposedly were the investigators on this.

The FDA finally returned Carols calls but only after she sent numerous e-mails and contacted Rhode Island Senator Sheldon Whitehouse.

Five minutes after contacting the Senators office, I received a call from a woman at the FDA, Carol said. She told me my previous messages apparently didnt get through.

This whole experience has been so frustrating. Its like being on a merry-go-round and I keep going to back to square one. And all I really wanted was for someone to test my cats food.

New Organization Responds

A new organization called The Pet Food Products Safety Alliance answered Carols plea.

That organization -- created to raise public awareness of pet food safety issues paid ExperTox to test Carols cat food. A representative with the group, Don Earl, learned about Carols situation on an Internet Web site.

Don asked me if I would send him the cats food to be tested and I told him Id be happy to, Carol said, adding shed saved several unopened pouches of Special Kitty since March and stored the food in her freezer. Don wanted to know which flavor was worse and I said I feed my cats every flavor. Thats why he wanted three different flavors. He knew the results would be scrutinized.

ExperToxs results on the Special Kitty food are significant for two reasons, Earl said.

To my knowledge, this is the first time acetaminophen has been detected in the presence of melamine.

Red herring

The tests also cast doubt on the theory that melamine is the culprit behind the pet food recall, he said.

(These tests) add significantly to the body of evidence that melamine has been used by the pet food companies as a red herring to cover up the actual toxin that killed an estimated quarter of a million pets, said Earl, who has extensively researched this issue since his cat, Chuckles, died in January. Chuckles went into kidney failure after eating Pet Pride cat food that wasnt included in the recall.

Earl said his research -- and these latest finding by ExperTox -- have convinced him that another toxic caused the illnesses and deaths in pets nationwide.

The scientific data, he said, just doesnt support the melamine theory.

Melamine is less toxic than common table salt and couldn't possibly account for the kidney failure epidemic in affected pets, he said.

ExperToxs latest results also add to the growing list of pet foods that have recently tested positive for acetaminophen, including:

• About a half-dozen samples of pet food tested in May. ExperTox did not disclose the brands of those foods because of a confidentiality agreement. But Earl confirmed that two of those samples were Menu Foods Pet Pride "Turkey and Giblets Dinner" and Pet Pride "Mixed Grill that he sent to the lab for analysis. The FDA disputed ExperToxs findings, but we discovered the FDA could not confirm it tested the same lots and brands in which ExperTox detected the pain medication;

• A sample of pet food -- identified as CANIDAE dog food. ExperTox, however, said the sample arrived in a Ziploc bag and it could not confirm the pet food was a CANIDAE product. The lab's customer, who was not identified because of a confidentiality agreement, listed the sample as CANIDAE pet food on ExperToxs forms. CANIDAE denied its products contain acetaminophen, but said it would test samples of its food for the painkiller.

ExperToxs newest findings demand further investigation, Carol said.

I know some people have criticized ExperTox, but I trust them. I know how hard it is for a lab to stay accredited. I dont think the FDA can continue to turn its head on acetaminophen.

FDA, Menu Foods Mum

But will the FDA unleash a new investigation of possible toxins in the tainted pet food in the wake of ExperToxs latest findings?

Will it specifically look for acetaminophen in pet food?

An FDA spokeswoman told us the agency does not comment on pending legislation, litigation, or citizen petitions.

What about the run-around Carol received trying to get some answers from the FDA and get that agency to test her cats food?

The FDA spokeswoman suggested Carol contact the FDAs Consumer Complaint Coordinator. Carol took that action on Tuesday and said the FDA now seems interested in the Special Kitty food.

The FDA coordinator took very detailed information from me, Carol said, adding the representative wanted her cats medical records and additional information about their food. I think from my tone she knew that I have no intention of keeping this quiet.

Menu Foods, on the other hand, is keeping quiet about these latest test results. The company did not respond to our inquiries.

In the meantime, Carol said her cats are getting better each day.

Jessica is 90 percent of her sassy self, she said. And Smudge just started eating on her own at the end of June. We were feeding her in a syringe for months. We were determined that if she survived this in the beginning, she had a right to make a full recovery.

Pet owners also have a right not to worry every time they feed their dogs or cats, Carol said.

I dont want something like this to happen again. My cats dont have the reserves to survive even one more bite of bad food.

The FDA cannot dismiss this as they have with all the other tests (that detected) acetaminophen.



Lab Tests Again Find Acetaminophen in Pet Food...

CANIDAE Denies Reports of Painkiller in its Pet Food


Responding to a ConsumerAffairs.com report, CANIDAE Pet Food denies that its products contain the painkiller acetaminophen, saying the claim came from one report by one unconfirmed laboratory.

The company, however, said it takes such allegations seriously and is now testing samples of its products.

As we reported on Thursday, toxicologists at ExperTox Inc. Analytical Laboratory of Texas detected acetaminophen in a sample of pet food identified as CANIDAE dog food. The lab issued that report on September 4, 2007.

We also confirmed the findings with the manager of the Deer Park, Texas, laboratory. That is one of our reports, Lab Manager, Donna Coneley, told us.

Coneley, however, said the sample arrived in a Ziploc bag and ExperTox cannot confirm the pet food is a CANIDAE brand. The labs customer, who was not identified because of a confidentiality agreement, identified the sample as CANIDAE pet food on ExperToxs forms.

Coneley also confirmed the lab detected acetaminophen in the dog food, but pointed out that the report didnt show the amount of painkiller found in the sample.

ExperToxs report also revealed its toxicologists did not detect cyanuric acid or melamine in the dog food tested.

Melamine is the chemical that triggered this years massive pet food recall. In March, Menu Foods recalled more than 60 million containers of dog and cat food the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) said were tainted with melamine. Thats a chemical used to make plastic and fertilizers. It is not allow in pet or human food.

Thousands of dogs and cats nationwide suffered kidney problems or died after eating the tainted food.

The FDA said it found melamine in the imported wheat gluten and rice protein concentrate used to make the pet food. FDA officials traced the source of that contamination to two now-defunct companies in China.

No CANIDAE pet foods were involved in that recall.

Acetaminophen Found In Other Brands

This latest finding of acetaminophen in dog food comes less than four months after ExperTox discovered the painkiller in about a half a dozen samples of pet food it tested.

The lab did not disclose the brands of pet food that tested positive for acetaminophen in May because of a confidentiality agreement.

But ConsumerAffairs.com learned two of those samples were Menu Foods Pet Pride "Turkey and Giblets Dinner" and Pet Pride "Mixed Grill.

Grieving cat owner Don Earl of Port Townsend, Washington, told us he paid ExperTox to analyze those brands of pet food. He said the samples tested were the same lots and styles of food that he fed his cat, Chuckles, before she died in January, 2007, after eating the Pet Pride food.

ConsumerAffairs.com confirmed those samples of cat food tested positive for acetaminophen. They also tested positive for the chemical cyanuric acid -- commonly used in pool chlorination.

But the samples of Pet Pride did not reveal any melamine contamination.

That finding didnt surprise Earl, who has asked a federal court to force the FDA to investigate other toxins -- besides melamine -- as the culprit behind the pet food recall.

Melamine has impressed me as being a red herring since day one, he said. The substance has been the subject of credible scientific tests and studies for decades. Nothing supports the theory it could be lethal even in amounts 10 times the highest reported to be present in the food. As to why no one is finding other toxins in the food, the simple explanation is no one is looking for other toxins in the food.

FDA Disputed Earlier Reports

The FDA refuted ExperToxs earlier findings of acetaminophen in the pet food, saying it didnt detect the painkiller in a handful of samples it tested.

But ConsumerAffairs.com learned the FDA couldnt confirm it tested the same lots and brands of pet food in which ExperTox found the pain medication.

ExperTox told us it tested 100 to 150 samples of pet food -- and detected acetaminophen in five of those samples. The FDA tested just a few samples of pet food for the painkiller.

Its easier to say that we cant confirm something by looking at a few samples than to really investigate and continue investigating until you know something for sure, Coneley told us.

CANIDAE also cast doubt on ExperToxs earlier findings of acetaminophen in pet food.

And the San Luis Obispo, California, company questioned the accuracy of the labs current report about detecting acetaminophen in a sample of CANIDAE dog food.

There is one report by one unconfirmed laboratory that has given rise these claims, the companys Jim Mantych said in a written statement faxed on Friday to ConsumerAffairs.com. That same laboratory also claimed acetaminophen contamination in other products that the FDA and the laboratory at the University of California examined as well and as to which those laboratories found that the claims could not be validated.

Mantych added: We do not put acetaminophen in our products in any way, shape or form, nor is it used in any of our ingredients.

Nevertheless, Mantych said his company is testing samples of its pet food for possible contamination.

CANIDAE takes any such allegations extremely seriously and is working hard to acquire as much factual information regarding these allegations as possible. We have already sent a battery of samples to be tested by the most current and reliable test methods available.

ExperTox told us on Thursday that it is not required to report its latest findings of acetaminophen in the dog food to the FDA. In previous cases, the lab said, its clients reported the test results to that federal agency.

We contacted the FDA on Thursday about ExperToxs latest findings. A spokesman told us he was checking into the matter.



CANIDAE Denies Reports of Painkiller in its Pet Food...

Lab Tests Find Painkiller in Samples of Pet Food


A sample of pet food -- identified as CANIDAE dog food -- has tested positive for the painkiller acetaminophen, ConsumerAffairs.com has learned.

The findings are contained in a report issued by the ExperTox Inc. Analytical Laboratory earlier this week, which reveals its toxicologists detected acetaminophen in a sample of pet food listed as CANIDAE dog food.

We also confirmed the findings with the manager of the Deer Park, Texas, laboratory. That is one of our reports, Donna Coneley, lab manager, told us.

Coneley, however, said the sample arrived in a Ziploc bag and ExperTox cannot confirm the pet food is a CANIDAE product. The lab's customer, who was not identified because of a confidentiality agreement, identified the sample as CANIDAE pet food on ExperToxs forms.

Coneley also confirmed the lab detected acetaminophen in the dog food, but she pointed out that the report doesnt show the amount of painkiller found in the sample.

No melamine

ExperToxs report also reveals its toxicologists did not detect cyanuric acid or melamine in the dog food tested.

Melamine is the chemical that triggered this years massive pet food recall. In March, Menu Foods recalled more than 60 million containers of dog and cat food the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) said were tainted with melamine. Thats a chemical used to make plastic and fertilizers. It is not allow in pet or human food.

Thousands of dogs and cats nationwide suffered kidney problems or died after eating the tainted food.

The FDA said it found melamine in the imported wheat gluten and rice protein concentrate used to make the pet food. FDA officials traced the source of that contamination to two now-defunct companies in China.

Acetaminophen found in other brands

This latest finding of acetaminophen in dog food comes less than four months after ExperTox discovered the painkiller in about a half a dozen samples of pet food it tested.

The lab did not disclose the brands of pet food that tested positive for acetaminophen in May because of a confidentiality agreement.

But ConsumerAffairs.com learned two of those samples were Menu Foods Pet Pride "Turkey and Giblets Dinner" and Pet Pride "Mixed Grill.

Grieving cat owner Don Earl of Port Townsend, Washington, told us he paid ExperTox to analyze those brands of pet food. He said the samples tested were the same lots and styles of food that he fed his cat, Chuckles, before she died in January 2007 after eating the Pet Pride food.

ConsumerAffairs.com confirmed those samples of cat food tested positive for acetaminophen. They also tested positive for the chemical cyanuric acid -- commonly used in pool chlorination.

But the samples of Pet Pride did not reveal any melamine contamination.

Not surprised

That finding didnt surprise Earl.

Melamine has impressed me as being a red herring since day one, said Earl, who recently asked a federal court to force the FDA to investigate other toxins -- besides melamine -- as the culprit behind the pet food recall.

The substance has been the subject of credible scientific tests and studies for decades. Nothing supports the theory it could be lethal even in amounts 10 times the highest reported to be present in the food. As to why no one is finding other toxins in the food, the simple explanation is no one is looking for other toxins in the food.

FDA disputed earlier reports

The FDA disputed ExperToxs earlier findings of acetaminophen in the pet food, saying it didnt detect the painkiller in a handful of samples it tested. But ConsumerAffairs.com learned the FDA couldnt confirm it tested the same lots and brands of pet food in which ExperTox found the pain medication.

ExperTox told us it tested 100 to 150 samples of pet food -- and detected acetaminophen in five of those samples. The FDA tested just a few samples of pet food for the painkiller.

Its easier to say that we cant confirm something by looking at a few samples than to really investigate and continue investigating until you know something for sure, Coneley told us. I think this might have been a quick way to get everyone off their (FDA) backs.

Coneley said her lab is not required to report its latest findings of acetaminophen in the dog food to the FDA.

The clients consistently have done that, she said.

We contacted the FDA late Thursday about ExperToxs latest findings. We also contacted CANIDAE Pet Food, but the company did not return our calls.

CANIDAE Pet Food, which is headquartered in San Luis Obispo, California, states on its Web site that all its products are safe and not part of this years massive recall.

It appears from the latest news within our industry that all recalls were from protein concentrates imported from China, the companys Web site states. CANIDAE does not use any protein concentrates, or grain fractions and we do not import any ingredients from China or overseas.

All CANIDAE and FELIDAE ingredients are of U.S. origin . . . We pride ourselves on making only the highest quality, all natural pet foods using the finest ingredients available that meet or exceed the nutrient profiles as established by the AAFCO Dog and Cat Food Nutrient Profiles.



Lab Tests Find Painkiller in Samples of Pet Food...

Purina Denies Claim on Bichon Frise Deaths


The insurance company that represents pet food giant Nestle Purina has denied any liability in the deaths of two Bichon Frise with champion bloodlines.

Meanwhile, ConsumerAffairs.com learned the American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (ASPCA) is now reviewing the dogs medical records and their unexpected deaths.

The dogs suddenly died last year within two months of each other. Their owner, Julie N. of Harlan, Kentucky, blames the deaths on Purinas dry dog food specifically Purina One, Purina ProPlan and Purina Dog Chow.

I think theres something wrong with the food, she says. Theres no other explanation for these dogs to suddenly die.

They were both healthy. They were bred from champion bloodlines. And one of the dogs -- Beeble -- was just a puppy.

She was a healthy 12-month-old Bichon Frise, says Julie, who breeds and shows Bichon Frise. But then she suddenly started drinking excessive amounts of water, was vomiting, and became very lethargic.

Julie immediately took Beeble to the veterinarian.

But she died four days after he put her on antibiotics and started I.V. fluids.

Theres no reason that puppy should have died, Julie says. Her parents had genetic clearance. She was a perfectly healthy dog.

Two months later -- On October 26 -- another one of Julies healthy dogs unexpectedly died. In this case, it was her eight-year-old Bichon Frise, Kayla.

Kayla was a healthy female who did pet therapy, Julie says. But then she started drinking enormous amounts of water. At first, I thought she might have diabetes. But the tests were negative on that.

Autopsy Reveals Possible Link

Heartbroken and baffled by the dogs death -- and determined to find answers -- Julie had autopsies performed on Beeble and Kayla at the University of Tennessees Veterinary Teaching Hospital in Knoxville.

The autopsy report on Beeble revealed a possible connection between the puppys death and the food she ate.

Pathologists discovered problems with Beebles liver that were consistent with exposure to a hepatotoxin such as aflatoxin. Aflatoxins are poisons produced by fungus or mold. These toxins are often found in corn and other agriculture crops and commonly cause liver disease.

But how could Beeble become exposed to -- and ingest -- aflatoxins?

Simple.

The aflatoxins could have come from the (dog) food, Beebles veterinarian, Douglas Mickey, told ConsumerAffairs.com. He reviewed Beebles and Kaylas autopsy reports and -- with Julies permission -- agreed to discuss them with us. Aflatoxins are known to be found in moldy grains, like corn that would be in dog food.

He added: If youre asking me if theres a possible connection between the pet food and Beebles death, the answer is: you cant rule that out.

Aflatoxins in pet food have contributed to the deaths of more than 100 dogs in recent year, including:

• The deaths of 25 dogs in 1999. In that case, Doane Pet Care recalled more than one million bags of corn-based dry dog food tainted with aflatoxins. Fifty-four brands of dog food, including OlRoy, were part of that recall;

• The deaths of 100 dogs in 2005. In that instance, Diamond Food recalled some of its pet food because the moldy corn in the products contained aflatoxins.

Aflatoxins, however, are not linked to Menu Foods massive recall in March of 60 million containers of dog and cat food. That pet food recall -- the largest in U.S. history -- is blamed on melamine contamination in the imported wheat gluten and rice protein used to make the food.

Thousands of dogs and cats nationwide suffered kidney problems or died after eating the melamine-tainted food.

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) traced the source of the melamine contamination to two now-defunct companies in China.

Kaylas Death Remains a Mystery

Aflatoxins also didnt play a role in Kaylas death, Dr. Mickey told ConsumerAffairs.com

That dog didnt die from anything in her food, he said. What caused her death remains a medical mystery.

Kaylas autopsy report revealed she had multiple organ mineralization, which Dr. Mickey said was likely caused by an adrenal problem.

But (the pathologists) couldnt pinpoint on the autopsy what caused the mineralization of all those organs, he said. It would be consistent with adrenal or kidney problems, but her adrenal glands and kidneys were fine.

Kaylas death has puzzled everyone who has looked at it. Everyone, that is, except Julie.

Despite the autopsy report, shes convinced Purinas dog food also contributed to Kaylas death.

Purina Denies Claim

Purinas insurance company, however, disagrees.

In a letter Julie received from Sedgwick Claims Management Services, a claim examiner states: After careful review of the records from the University of Tennessee Veterinary Teaching Hospital, I must respectfully deny liability on behalf of Nestle Purina PetCare Company for this claim . . . neither Beedles (sic) nor Kaylas medical problems would result from their diets.

The insurance company, which misspelled Beebles name, concluded the puppy died from severe hemorrhagic bronchopneumonia. It also stated Kaylas death appeared to be steroid induced and most likely the result of Cushings syndrome.

But Julie says the company reached that conclusion -- and sent its letter in mid-August -- without reading the entire autopsy reports.

I immediately called the insurance company after I received the letter and asked them how they could disregard the pathologists finding that the problems with Beebles liver were consistent with exposure to aflatoxins, Julie says. And the claims adjuster told me she didnt see that in the reportshe admitted that she didnt have a copy of the last page of the autopsy report.

Julie re-sent that report.

But a claim examiner called me later and said the company had reached the same conclusionit wasnt Purinas fault. I asked them again about the aflatoxins and they just said Beeble died from pneumonia. They also said Kayla died from steroid induced Cushings syndrome, but she was never on steroids.

No Comment

A spokesman for Purina declined to comment on the insurance companys finding.

In a previous interview, spokesman Keith Schopp defended Purinas handling of Julies concerns and said there were no aflatoxins in the companys products in the Untied States.

ASPCA Reviewing Records

Meanwhile, ConsumerAffairs.com confirmed today that Julies case has captured the attention of the ASPCA.

We learned an ASPCA veterinarian is now -- at Julies request -- reviewing the medical records and autopsy reports on Beeble and Kayla. A spokeswoman said its too early to comment on any findings because the organization just received the documents on Tuesday.

Fighting For Justice for Her Dogs

Julie is also considering legal action, saying shell do whatever it takes to get justice for her dogs and other pets that might be at risk.

Im not doing this to make a profit, she says. I never wanted to pursue legal action in the first place. All I wanted was for Purina to take my information and check its food. But now they need to acknowledge that this has happened and make sure no one elses pets die. I dont want any other animals to die like mine.

She adds: You know that old (Shakespeare) saying that something is rotten in the state of Denmark? Well, something is definitely rotten at Purina.



Purina Denies Claim on Bichon Frise Deaths...

FDA Blocks Nutro Pet Food Shipment from Entering U.S.


The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in July blocked more than 100 Nutro Products -- various styles and flavors of its dog and cat food -- from entering the United States.

ConsumerAffairs.com learned the FDA took that action at the Port of Los Angeles -- and listed Nutros pet food on its Import Refusal Report -- because the products appeared to contain poisonous substances and unsafe additives.

The FDA has authority to block and detain any regulated products from entering the United States if they appear to be out of compliance with The Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act.

Some of Nutros pet food on the Import Refusal List include its Adult Turkey with Chicken Liver, Choice Adult Cat w Turkey & Duck, Choice Complete Care Kitten Rich in Chicken with Liver, and Adult Large Breed Chicken & Rice.

News of the FDAs action alarmed Mike G. of Florida. He owns multiple cats and feeds them Nutro products.

What isnt clear is which additive it is that is unsafe, and which substance it is that is poisonous, he told us. The three Nutro canned cat products I have in front of me all state Made in USA. But they don't say which state or which US territory.

He added: I dont so much care where (the products came from). Its the 'which' (unsafe additives and substances) that concerns me.

Mike contacted Nutro about his concerns, but says the company ignored his inquires.

He wasnt surprised.

From previous experience, most responses from Nutro have been non-responsive, he said.

Mike shared with us the message he sent to Nutro, which echoes concerns weve heard from other pet owners:

I want to know, specifically, before I feed any of these foods I have in the house to my cats, exactly where Nutro cat foods are made, exactly where those foods on the FDA Import Refusal Reports were made, and specifically which additive it is which is unsafe, and which substance it is which is deemed poisonous or 'deleterious. If I do not receive a satisfactory response I will be taking these cans back to where they were purchased, and will never again be purchasing other Nutro products.

In the aftermath of several thousand pet deaths, he added, Nutro and other companies need to demonstrate their commitment to pet safety by answering pet owners' questions satisfactorily.

Non-responsive

ConsumerAffairs.com also contacted Nutro about the FDAs action. It took the company more than a week to respond to our repeated calls.

Nutro, however, didnt answer our specific questions.

The companys Consumer Services Manager, Tamara Cerven, instead e-mailed us Nutros official, canned response.

It has been brought to our attention that confusion has been caused by the Food and Drug Administrations (FDA) Import Refusal Report, the companys statement said. We wish to assure our customers that this report is in no way a cause for concern about the quality and safety of Nutro pet foods currently on store shelves.

Nutro said the products listed the FDAs Import Refusal Report are ones affected by Menu Foods massive recall in March of melamine-tainted dog and cat food.

This report lists recalled product(s) that have been returned to Nutro from overseas, according to the companys statement. This product is not intended for sale.

Nutro said it immediately discontinued all sales of its melamine-tainted products and removed them from retail stores, warehouses, and distribution centers after Menu recalled 60 million containers of contaminated pet food.

Nutro also ordered recalled product to be shipped back to the U.S. from overseas for proper handling, the company said in its written statement. Some of this product is the subject of the FDA report.

Nutro said customers with questions about the FDAs action can call its customer service line at 1-800-833-5330 or visit its Web site at www.nutroproducts.com.

Mike doubts pet owners will get any answers, though.

They failed to respond to my mail, responding only to you, he told us today.

My confidence was rattled with both Nutro and Iams in March when I learned that they both used Menu Foods. I'm one who drove further to the pet-superstores to purchase what I had believed to have been better, safer' foods . . . only to learn they were made by the same company using some of the same unsafe contaminated ingredients which they also put into the cheaper, less-quality/ less-safe foods in the supermarkets.

So their failure to respond to me now, personally, is the last straw for me. If and when products begin to flow from their own plant and I get a thorough read-through of the label, I might then reconsider purchasing their product. But not before.

FDA Blocks Nutro Pet Food Shipment from Entering U.S....

Krasdale, Red Flannel Dog Food Recalled


Mars Petcare U.S. has recalled two brands of its dry dog food because of potential salmonella contamination.

The Franklin-Tennessee pet food company this week recalled five-pound bags of its Krasdale Gravy dry dog food -- sold in Connecticut, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New York, and Pennsylvania -- and 50-pound bags of its Red Flannel Large Breed Adult Formula dry food sold in Pennsylvania.

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) tested more than 150 sub-samples of the companys pet foods. Two of those samples tested positive for salmonella: one from the Krasdale Gravy dry food and another from the Red Flannel Large Breed Adult Formula dry food.

Salmonella is an organism that can cause serious and sometimes fatal infections in young children, frail or elderly people, and others with weakened immune systems, the FDA said.

Pets with Salmonella infections may become lethargic and have diarrhea, fever, and vomiting. Some pets will also have decreased appetite, fever, and abdominal pain. Dogs that ate the recalled foods and have these symptoms should see a veterinarian.

The FDA warned that Salmonella can be transferred to people handling pet food, especially if they have not thoroughly washed their hands.

The pet foods involved in this recall are:



Product: Krasdale Gravy dry dog food
Size: Five-pound bag
UPC Code: 7513062596
Best By Date: July 16, 2008 & July 17, 2008
Best By Date Location: Back of bag
Distribution: Stores in Connecticut, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New York, and Pennsylvania

Product: Red Flannel Large Breed Adult Formula dry dog food
Size: 50-pound bag
UPC Code: 4286900062
Best By Date: July 12, 2008
Best By Date Location: Back of bag
Distribution: Stores in Reedsland and Richlandtown, Pa.

Pet owners with questions about the recalled product can contact Mars Petcare US, Inc. at 866-298-8332.



Krasdale, Red Flannel Dog Food Recalled...

Melaminte-Related Pet Food Recall Went Unnoticed


Information obtained by ConsumerAffairs.com reveals that although a rendering plant in Texas recalled more than one million pounds of melamine-tainted meat and bone meal products in April, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) did not post information about the recall until July.

Darling International took the action during the height of the largest pet food recall in U.S. history.

When it finally did post the notice, the FDA listed the move as a Class III enforcement action, which means use of or exposure to a violative product is not likely to cause adverse health consequences.

The FDAs Web site states Darling issued two separate recalls on April 20 of 682,600 pounds of dry rendered tankage -- or meat and bone meal products -- because the products contained melamine.

That's the chemical that triggered the massive recall in March of millions of containers of pet food, and is blamed for causing kidney disease and deaths in thousands of dogs and cats nationwide.

The FDA said Darling International processed the melamine-tainted bone meal products at its Wichita, Kansas, plant and distributed them in the Sunflower State and in Nebraska.

News of this latest melamine-related recall -- and its delayed posting -- alarmed pet owners nationwide. They fear the tainted products could have made their way back into their pets foods.

They also wondered why the FDA didnt immediately post the recall.

The FDA made no mention on its site of this recall until July 25th, and it's listed as a Class III recall, cat owner, Don E. of Washington, told ConsumerAffairs.com. So a meat and bone meal product, adulterated with melamine that could be used in pet food, is a Class III recall. But melamine in pet food is a Class I recall.

Pet owner Mike G. of Florida raised similar concerns.

Why would this firm which deals in rendered animal proteins, not in vegetable proteins, have to recall products containing melamine? he asked. This was in late April, about when it was learned that 'salvaged pet foods' had been fed to hogs, chickens, and farm-raised fish.

Does something not seem right?

A spokesman for Darling International says his company understands pet owners worries.

But Ross Hamilton, international director of governmental affairs and technology for Darling, said none of the melamine-tainted meat and bone meal products wound up in pet food.

I empathize with pet owners and my message to them is none of this got into pet food, he told ConsumerAffairs.com.

The contaminated material, however, did get into commercial feed for pigs and chicken.

The loads that were recalled did go into to animal feedcommercial animal feed, Hamilton said. But after it left our facility, it was blended with other feeds, and at that point, the FDA said the melamine wasnt detectable in the food. It was diluted down through normal procedures and by the time it got into commercial feed, it was so diluted that you couldnt detect the melamine.

The FDA and the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) tested animals that consumed the melamine-tainted feed. Those tests concluded that meat from these animals is safe for humans to eat.

There is very low risk of human illness from eating such meat, the FDA states on its Web site.

How did the melamine-tainted materials wind up at Darlings Irving, Texas, plant?

One of our facilities inadvertently received it from Menu Foods (Emporia, Kansas) plant and we didnt find out it contained melamine until after the recall began, Hamilton said. When the FDA was doing a trace-out from Menu, they found some of this material -- its meat scraps -- that we routinely pick up from Menu.

He added: We have manufacturing hazardous plans in place for hazards that we are aware of. But this one (melamine) was one that we werent aware of. This was one that we had to add to our list; it was a surprise to us.

Hamilton said the FDA didnt cover-up this recall, as some pet owners have alleged. He said the agency simply didnt make it public until it finished its investigation.

We worked with them on this recall, Hamilton said. Theyre pretty meticulous and delayed posting this until they had closed out their investigation.



Melaminte-Related Pet Food Recall Went Unnoticed...

Cat Owner Files Legal Action Against FDA in Pet Food Deaths


A grieving cat owner has filed action in federal court to force the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to perform its duty and investigate other toxins -- besides melamine -- as the culprit in this years massive pet food recall.

Don Earl of Port Townsend, Washington, also wants the court to order the FDA to stop what he considers all activities (by the agency) involving the destruction of critical pet food evidence.

Earl filed his petition for a Writ of Mandamus on August 9 in Washingtons Western District U.S. Court in Tacoma.

Barrons Law Dictionary defines this action as an extraordinary writ issued from a court to an official compelling performance of an act which the law recognizes as a duty.

The dictionary adds: It is extraordinary in the sense that it is used only when all other judicial remedies have failed or are inadequate.

Earl says hes exhausted all other avenues to make the FDA investigate contaminates besides melamine for the kidney problems and deaths of thousands of pets nationwide that ate the tainted food.

In March, Menu Foods recalled 60 million containers of pet food. The FDA said the imported ingredients used to make the food -- wheat gluten and rice protein -- were tainted with the chemical melamine.

FDA officials said they traced the source of that melamine-contamination to two now-defunct companies in China.

But Earl, whose cat died in January after eating some of Menus pet food, says the FDA has ignored other likely causes for the pet food contamination.

The five-month investigation by the FDA into circumstances surrounding the March 16, 2007 pet food recall, to date, may only be described as whimsical, Earl writes in his petition. He is representing himself in this action.

From the beginning, the FDA appears to be following a predetermined script, which is based exclusively on unsupportable theories related to melamine from China. Not only does the melamine from China theory fail in the face of all available evidence, the FDA has moved aggressively to discount credible evidence which not only refutes the melamine from China theories, but which have every indication, if properly investigated, of uncovering the true source of toxins responsible for the deaths of thousands of companion animals across the entire United States, he argued.

One of those toxins is acetaminophen, Earl says.

And he has lab reports that support his conviction.

In May, Earl hired a private laboratory in Texas, ExperTox, to analyze samples of Menus Pet Pride Turkey and Giblets and Mixed Grill cat food. Thats the brand of food his beloved cat, Chuckles, ate before she suffered kidney problems and died.

Earl says he took this action because the FDA refused to accept samples of Chuckles pet food.

Based upon the FDAs refusal to investigate and apparent dereliction of its investigative dutiesthe Petitioner began an effort to independently investigate the matter, he states in his petition.

Earl said ExperTox tested the same styles and lot numbers of Pet Pride cat food that he fed Chuckles.

And those tests detected the popular pain killer, acetaminophen, in the food, ConsumerAffairs.com confirmed.

The tests also uncovered another chemical in the food: cyanuric acid, which is commonly used in pool chlorination.

No Melamine

But they did not detect the chemical that triggered the largest pet food recall in U.S. history melamine.

That didnt surprise Earl.

Melamine has impressed me as being a red herring since day one, he said. The substance has been the subject of credible scientific tests and studies for decades. Nothing supports the theory it could be lethal even in amounts 10 times the highest reported to be present in the food.

Earl says the FDA has turned a blind eye to those scientific facts -- even ones reported by the agencys experts -- and made contradictory statements about the source of the contamination.

The agency, he says, also disregarded scientific reports that revealed other toxins contaminated the pet food.

Earl cites several examples in his petition, including:

• This comment made by the FDAs expert, Dr. Donald Smith, during a March 30 press conference: We have not been able to match melamine or the crystals of melamine in terms of the morphology with the identification were seeing visually in the clinically affected cat. I want to state once again that theres no evidence yet to tie in the melamine;

• This statement made by the FDAs Dr. Steven Sundlof during the March 30 press conference that contradicts Dr. Smith: . . . at this time, none of the independent laboratories, whether its the Cornell laboratory or the FDA laboratory -- have been able to confirm the presence of aminopterin (a rat poison and cancer drug) in those samples. And therefore, we are focusing now on melamine;

• The FDAs repeated denials of the presence of acetaminophen in samples of Pet Prides food, which refute ExperToxs findings. Earl quotes FDA spokespersons who said: We cannot validate their (ExperToxs) findings, and At this point, the FDA sees no compelling need to analyze anymore samples of acetaminophen. Earls petitions also points out that ConsumerAffairs.com learned the FDA only tested a handful of samples for acetaminophen and could not confirm it analyzed the same samples in which ExperTox detected the pain killer.

Evidence Destroyed

Earls petition also alleges the FDA systematically destroyed crucial evidence during the pet food investigation.

In this case destruction would be the appropriate disposition, he quotes the FDAs Dr. David Elder as saying when asked about the destruction of the recalled food.

The FDAs Web site also stated all tainted pet foodcontinues to be recalled and destroyed, Earl writes in his petition.

He adds: That critical evidence is being systematically destroyed in an investigation of this nature and scope is unheard of.

Its also illegal, Earl alleges.

with pending civil litigation and an ongoing federal investigation in progress, this spoliation of critical evidence is a criminal offense, his petition states. A court order is required before such destruction may be commenced.

Earls petition further alleges that the FDAs derelict actions have failed to ensure foods are safe, wholesome and sanitary and protect pets and their grieving owners.

In addition to public safety issues, the deceptive manner in which the FDA has controlled, withheld, and otherwise manipulated critical information, and destroyed essential evidence, is to the detriment of a large class of pet owners who suffered damages caused by the poisoned pet food epidemic, his petition states.

No Comment

ConsumerAffairs.com contacted the FDA about Earls petition. The agency, however, did not respond.

This is the second legal action Earl has taken in the wake of the pet food recall.

In July, he filed a $72,000 lawsuit against Menu Foods and Kroger for emotional and financial damages.

The lawsuit, filed in Washington Superior Court, alleges his cat died because her food contained acetaminophen.

According to documents and studies published by the (American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals) ASPCA, due to their body chemistries, cats are unable to tolerate acetaminophen and no amount of acetaminophen is safe for cats, the lawsuit states.



Cat Owner Files Legal Action Against FDA in Pet Food Deaths...

Article Image

Kentucky Woman Blames Purina for Her Dogs' Deaths


For the past year, professional dog breeder Julie N. has waged a one-woman campaign against pet food giant Nestl Purina.


Stryker


Beeble


Kayla

Shes convinced the companys food contributed to the recent and mysterious deaths of three of her healthy dogs -- two Bichon Frise and a Labrador Retriever.

And this spunky Harlan, Kentucky woman has evidence that suggests Purinas products might be the culprit in the death of at least one of her dogs.

Im not going away, says Julie, who fed her dogs Purina One, Purina ProPlan and Purina Dog Chow. I want justice for my dogs and peace of mind for myself.

Julies nightmare started last July when her 12-year-old Labrador Retriever, Stryker, suddenly died of liver complications.

He was a healthy dog, she says, but then his liver just shut down.

One month later, Julies puppy, Beeble, unexpectedly died.

She was a healthy 12-month-old Bichon Frise. But then she suddenly started drinking excessive amounts of water, was vomiting, and became very lethargic.

Julie immediately took Beeble to the veterinarian.

He put her on antibiotics, but that night she had a seizure. She also had a difficult time breathing. She was so weak that she couldnt hold up her head.

Julie rushed Beeble back to the vet.

And he admitted her and put her on IVs. Beeble also had some nasal discharge and our vet checked her for canine flu. But she passed those tests.

Beeble died on August 17 four days after she started IV treatments.

Theres no reason that puppy should have died, Julie says. Her parents had genetic clearance. She was a perfectly healthy dog.

Deaths Come In Threes

Theres an old saying that deaths come in threes. And thats what happened with Julies dogs.

On October 26 -- two months after Beebles death -- another one of her dogs died. In this case, it was Julies eight-year-old Bichon Frise, Kayla.

Kayla was a healthy female who did pet therapy. But then she started drinking enormous amounts of water. At first, I thought she might have diabetes. But the tests were negative on that.

What caused Kaylas death?

What about Beeble and Stryker?

And what role did Purinas foods play in their deaths?

Julie says she may never know why Stryker died. At the time, we didnt do an autopsy because we just thought it was old age. But she vowed to found out why Beeble and Kayla died.

I dont want anybody else to go through the same pain that Ive gone through, she says. These are my children. They were here after my dad passed away and when my brother was ill. They were my babies all my dogs are my babies.

Julie, however, didnt test Purinas food for possible toxins.

Her dogs died months before Menu Food recalled 60 million containers of melamine-tainted food. That action -- the largest pet food recall in U.S. history -- occurred in March 2007.

Thousands of dogs and cats that ate the contaminated food suffered kidney disease or died.

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) discovered melamine in the imported wheat gluten and rice protein used to make the pet food. FDA officials traced the source of that chemical contamination to two now-defunct companies in China.

It didnt dawn on me to save the food so I could have it tested, Julie says, unable to hide the regret in her voice. And Purina told me to throw the food away.

She did, however, have autopsies performed on Beeble and Kayla at the University of Tennessees Veterinary Teaching Hospital in Knoxville.

I wish we would have done the same with Stryker, she says of the Lab that was titled in obedience. But like I said, we just thought he died from old age. I dont think that anymore ... I think theres something wrong with the dog food.

According to Beebles autopsy report, thats possible.

Pathologists at the University of Tennessee discovered problems with the puppys liver that were consistent with exposure to a hepatotoxin such as aflatoxin.

Aflatoxins are poisons produced by fungus or mold. These toxins are often found in corn and other agriculture crops and commonly cause liver disease.

But how could Beeble become exposed to -- and ingest -- aflatoxins?

Simple.

The aflatoxins could have come from the (dog) food, Beebles veterinarian, Douglas Mickey, told ConsumerAffairs.com. He reviewed Beebles and Kaylas autopsy reports and -- with Julies permission -- agreed to discuss them with us.

Aflatoxins are known to be found in moldy grains, like corn that would be in dog food, he said, adding: If youre asking me if theres a possible connection between the pet food and Beebles death, the answer is: you cant rule that out.

Aflatoxins in pet food have contributed to the deaths of more than 100 dogs in recent year, including:

• The deaths of 25 dogs in 1999. In that case, Doane Pet Care recalled more than one million bags of corn-based dry dog food tainted with aflatoxins. Fifty-four brands of dog food, including OlRoy, were part of that recall;

• The deaths of 100 dogs in 2005. In that instance, Diamond Food recalled some of its pet food because the moldy corn in the products contained aflatoxins.

Kaylas Death Remains A Mystery

Aflatoxins, however, did not play a role in Kaylas death, Dr. Mickey said. That dog didnt die from anything in her food.

Her death remains a medical mystery.

Kaylas autopsy report revealed she had multiple organ mineralization, which Dr. Mickey said was likely caused by an adrenal problem.

But (the pathologists) couldnt pinpoint on the autopsy what caused the mineralization of all those organs, Dr. Mickey said. It would be consistent with adrenal or kidney problems, but her adrenal glands and kidneys were fine.

Kaylas death has puzzled everyone who has looked at it.

Everyone, that is, except Julie.

Despite the autopsy report, shes convinced Purinas dog food contributed to Kaylas death.

And she says a recent ConsumerAffairs.com investigation -- about the mysterious reproductive problems several Newfoundlands across the country have encountered -- confirmed her belief.

Our investigation revealed that healthy Newfoundlands -- in Idaho, Texas, Ohio and Pennsylvania -- had suddenly stopped getting pregnant or -- if they conceived -- delivered deformed and dead puppies.

All these gentle giants had previously delivered healthy litters, their breeders said. They were all two to five-years old, which veterinarians say is the best age for dogs to deliver healthy litters.

None of the dogs were related a factor that could have caused genetic problems. And nothing in the breeders protocols had changed.

The only factor the Newfoundlands had in common was their food: They all ate Purina dog food.

After I read your story, I was convinced that there was a link between the deaths of my dogs and what happened to those Newfoundlands, Julie says. What got me with your stories was how those breeders talked about the mummified fetuses (deceased puppies) their dogs had delivered. In Kaylas autopsy report, it talks about the mineralization of all her internal organs.

That made me think that theres a connection with those stone puppies and my dogs internal organs turning to stone.

Dr. Mickey, however, said theres no correlation.

Its not the same thing, he said. Kayla apparently had adrenal problems ... thats a metabolic disease.

I think they now realize something is wrong with their food.

If thats the case, Julie wonders why Purina is finally taking her concerns seriously.

In just the past two weeks, the pet food makers insurance company has requested copies of her dogs medical records and autopsy reports.

But when they called, they wanted me to know that my dogs deaths had nothing to do with the recall because they died before that action was announced, she says. I told them that stuff from China (melamine) could have been in the food long before anyone knew.

Purina, she says, downplayed her concerns when she first contacted the company last fall right after Kayla became sick.

One lady kept saying shed never heard of any adverse effects from the companys food. Purina also kept sending me letters (of condolences) and samples of their stinking food. That made me ever madder. I dont want their food. Ill never feed Purina again to my dogs. I cook for my dogs now and theyre much healthier.

Julie no longer recommends Purina to her customers, either.

Ive gone as far as to state in my puppy contract that if you feed Purina products, I have a right to void the health guarantee on the dogs, she says, adding her pups cost $1,000 to $1,500.

Of Purinas latest interest in her dogs deaths, Julie says: I think they now realize something is wrong with their food.

Purina Defends Its Products and Actions

A spokesman for Purina denied that assertion, saying theres nothing usual about his companys recent actions in Julies case.

He says it demonstrates Purinas commitment to its customers.

Weve been in contact with this consumer since last September and since weve worked with her that long, we like to follow up on the process, said spokesman Keith Schopp. We would want to gather the appropriate documents and any other records that we could look at and then take the appropriate action.

As part of our standard operating procedure, he added, we would initiate a claim and investigate a matter further if a consumer requested compensation above product replacement.

Schopp said he hadnt seen Beebles autopsy report, which stated the puppys liver problems were consistent with exposure to aflatoxins.

But there are no aflatoxins in our products in the United States, he said. Our veterinarians, however, would like to look at that autopsy report and talk her vet.

What about a possible connection between Julies concerns and those raised by the Newfoundland breeders?

Schopp said theres no link. This consumer is not reporting any reproductive issues.

He also defended his companys response to Julies concerns.

Weve expressed our sympathy for the loss of her dogs and told her that we want to find out more about her situation, he said.

What does Julie want from Purina?

The main reason I contacted them was because I didnt want any other dogs to die, she says. I wanted them to test the food and to apologize.

Julie says she didnt wage this battle against the St. Louis-based company for financial gain even though her vet bills total more than $2,750.

Im not out for money. I just dont want anyone else to go through a dogs mysterious death.



Kentucky Woman Blames Purina for Her Dogs' Deaths...

Newfoundland Breeders Despair After Deaths and Deformities

By Lisa Wade McCormick
ConsumerAffairs.com

July 18, 2007
Professional dog breeder Lisa M. is ensnarled in a frightening mystery.

The case centers on her beloved Newfoundlands and why these gentle giants have experienced so many baffling reproductive problems in the past year.

Lisa has searched tirelessly for clues about whats caused her healthy dogs to suddenly stop getting pregnant or -- if they conceive -- to deliver deformed and dead puppies.

These are dogs that have all delivered healthy puppies before, says Lisa, owner of Lighthouse Newfoundlands in Grafton, Ohio. Ive been a full-time breeder since 1998 and Ive never experienced as many problems as I have in the past year. Its horrible.

The first signs of trouble surfaced last November.

Lisas dog, Vella, had a litter of four puppies.

Two were healthy. But two were mummified fetuses.

Thats like a miscarriage in the dog world, Lisa says. It looks like a mass of bone; the puppy is not alive. Breeders occasionally will have mummified fetuses. Ive never had it happen, though.

Twice in Two Months

But now its happened twice in just two months.

In January, 2007, Lisas dog, Juliet, had nine puppies.

Five were healthy. Three were mummified fetuses. And one was deformed.

That puppy had its elbow stuck to its side; it didnt live, Lisa says. And having three mummified fetuses in one litter was unbelievably horrible.

All this was just so unusual for me. It just wasnt right. Like I said, its never happened to me -- or my dogs -- before.

Her dogs never had trouble getting pregnant, either.

I bred four of my dogs and a friends dog in February. None of mine got pregnant. I usually get two or three, but never zero for four.

My friends dog had three puppies, but two died (two days after delivery). One of the puppies had a deformity a cleft palate.

Similar Problems Nationwide

A ConsumerAffairs.com investigation reveals Newfoundland breeders across the country have experienced similar problems with their dogs.

We talked to professional breeders in Idaho, Texas, and Pennsylvania whose dogs have encountered such puzzling reproductive issues as:

• Puppies that wouldnt grow and had to be euthanized. This same breeders dogs also had two mummified fetuses -- in two different litters -- and some of her females stopped getting pregnant;

• Having several misses -- or failed attempts -- at getting pregnant. This breeder also had a dog that delivered a deformed puppy, which had to be euthanized.

• Failing to get pregnant -- in the past two years. This breeders mom also raises Newfoundlands and one of those dogs delivered two dead puppies.

Likely Suspects

Whats causing these problems?

Lets consider some of the likely suspects:

• The Newfoundlands health The breeders say all their females are in excellent physical condition and have previously delivered healthy puppies. They also say theyre using the same sires and those males are in excellent health;

• The dogs ages -- Veterinarians say the prime age for dogs to deliver healthy litters is two to five. The breeders say all the dogs are in that age range;

• Genetic problems The breeders say none of the dogs are related, a factor that could pose genetic issues;

• Changes in breeding protocols The breeders say nothing in their breeding program has changed.

This whole thing is totally, horrendously insane, says Wendy C. of Blanchard, Idaho, who has bred Newfoundlands for seven years. Its just about ruined my breeding program.

Theres another suspect in this case. One any good sleuth would follow.

Its the dog food the only common denominator among these Newfoundlands.

All the breeders fed their dogs Purina Pro Plan and Purina One. And theyre convinced thats the culprit in this case.

Why am I certain its the food? Because nothing else has changed in my breeding program, says Lisa, who has 14 Newfoundlands. These are the same dames and the same sires. Theyve all had healthy litters before.

"I keep my kennels clean, I dont over-vaccinate, I dont add supplements, I dont use pesticides, I follow all the regular worming protocols ... nothing, absolutely nothing, has changed.

Wendy agrees.

The food is the only thing that makes sense. Its the only thing we all have in common.

At first I thought it was the water, but that cant be. There are too many us across the country having the same problems with our dogs. It just has to be the food.

The breeders say theyve fed their dogs Purina products for years and never had any problems. But Wendy and Lisa suspected something was wrong with the food last summer.

We both fed our puppies Purina One large breed puppy food, Wendy says. And all our puppies had horrible diarrhea. They were squirting water out of their bottoms. It was awful.

Anytime a puppy has diarrhea like that, theres something wrong. Its very dangerous. They can dehydrate and die.

The breeders suspicions about the food heightened in March. Thats when Menu Foods recalled 60 million containers of melamine-tainted pet food.

Melamine is a chemical used to make plastics and fertilizers; it is not approved for use in pet or human food. Thousands of dogs and cats nationwide suffered kidney disease or died after eating the melamine-tainted foods.

We panicked when we heard about the recall, Wendy says. The Purina we fed our dogs wasnt on the recall list, but we were still certain something was wrong with it. Maybe that melamine from China got into the food and Purina didnt know. Thats possible.

Lisa says news of the melamine-tainted food confirmed her worst fears about the reproductive problems with her dogs.

I read all about the effects melamine can have on pregnancies. And I learned that too much melamine can affect pregnancies.

I also belong to a chat room with 2,000 subscribers and did my own research with them. Thats when I found out that so many of us who were using Purina were having problems.

Mutant Puppies

At the Mountain Ridge Kennel in Blanchard, Idaho, Wendy fights back tears as she recalls the reproductive issues her Newfoundlands have faced in the past year and a half.

Its just been devastating. Ive been having beautiful litters for seven years. Ive always had huge, healthy puppies.

But that changed last summer.

I had two back-to-back litters and had to destroy 14 of those puppies, Wendy says. They wouldnt grow. They looked like mutants; it was hideous. They only weighed six to 10 pounds instead of 25 to 30 pounds at eight weeks. They were so thin. They looked like skeletons with fur.

The gruesome problems didnt stop there.

Wendys dogs also had two mummified fetuses in two different litters.

Plus Ive had females who have had four narrow puppies. Those are puppies that die. Somewhere along the way (during gestation) they were depleted. They werent what they should be at full-term. I believe its because of the poisonous food I unknowingly fed them.

Some of Wendys other dogs also stopped getting pregnant.

I bred three of my dogs (to deliver) at the end of February. I didnt have one litter. How unusual is that for me? Ive always gotten everything Ive bred. Im a full-time breeder. This is what I do.

Wendys not only grappled with the emotional toll these problems have taken on her dogs. And her family.

She also struggled with the financial repercussions theyve created.

Ive only had four healthy puppies since December 2005. Normally, I have 40 healthy puppies a year. This has just about bankrupted me.

Her voice cracks and tears fill her eyes.

Ive buried at least 20 dogs in the past year, says Wendy, whose puppies sell for $1,200 to $1,500 each. This has cost me more than $25,000. I couldnt sleep because there was no money to pay the bills. My long distance has been cut. Ive lost my insurance. Im facing foreclosure and will probably lose my house.

This just about killed me. Purina doesnt understand how much all this has devastated fulltime breeders like me.

Puppy Born Without Tail or Rectum

In Texas, another Newfoundland breeder wonders why her dogs have experienced so many unusual medical problems.

Ive had several missed breedings in last few years, says Brenda M. of Blanco, Texas, These are all females that should not have missed.

Brenda has raised Newfoundlands since 1995. And for the first time in her career, she had a dog deliver a deformed puppy.

It happened 18 months ago to her dog, Ramona.

The puppy was born without a tail or rectum. It was awful. It was alive when it was born, but I had to euthanize it.

Ive had litters before with stillborn puppies. But in all the years Ive done this that was my first deformed puppy. It was freaky and unpleasant.

Ramona also faced another inexplicable medical problem one not related to her reproductive system.

She unexpectedly died last month of cirrhosis of the liver.

Our vet could not find any reason for her to have such a severe case of cirrhosis of the liver. She was only five. She was too young to die from liver disease.

I dont know if her death was related to the food, Brenda says, referring to Purina One shed fed Ramona for years. But I dont trust dog food companies. Theres a huge doubt in my mind about the safety of pet food and that it might have contributed to Ramonas death.

Could it also have caused her dogs reproductive problems?

I am very suspicious of Purina. Everything thats happened is suspicious.

No Litters in Two Years

Across the country, two Newfoundland breeders in Pennsylvania say their dogs have also experienced bizarre reproductive problems.

I havent had a litter in two years, says one of the breeders, who didnt want to be identified because she was afraid of legal action by Purina. Thats real uncommon for me. These are proven breeders.

Her mom also raises Newfoundlands.

And one of her dogs recently had a litter with two dead puppies, the daughter says. They were stillborns; they didnt have fur on them and had been dead a while.

That dog was a repeat breeder who had two healthy litters before. I took her in for a culture two days after delivery (of the deceased puppies) and everything was negative. The dog was absolutely clean.

These breeders fed their dogs Purina One wet and dry food for more than 20 years.

And weve had excellent results up until last year. But now, we really think theres problem with the food. Otherwise, wed still be feeding it to our dogs.

Missing Evidence

To solve any mystery, though, a good sleuth needs solid evidence. A smoking gun memo. Or scientific data that proves the case.

But thats missing in this whodunit.

They breeders dont have any clinical analysis to support their convictions.

They didnt test the Purina they fed their dogs. They didnt have autopsies performed on the deceased puppies. And they didnt have lab work or ultrasounds done on the females that failed to get pregnant or delivered deformed or deceased puppies.

Why?

If all of us knew then what we know now, we would have done all sorts of things to prove our case, Wendy says. But along the way, we went through so much devastation and heartbreak that we didnt think of it.

Lisa concurs.

I didnt relate the problems to the food until I started reading about the effects melamine has on pregnancies.

Why didnt she have autopsies performed on the deceased puppies?

If I had known about melamine and the effects it has on humans and dogs, I would have, Lisa says. But these dogs were born in January three months before Menu announced the recall.

I know what happened to my dogs, though. Ive been a breeder a long time. I know something is going on with the food. Nothing else has changed in my breeding program. The only common denominator is the Purina.

Interesting Case But Premature to Blame Purina

Veterinarians we interviewed agree the cases are interesting. And warrant further investigation.

But they warn its premature to blame Purina for the Newfoundlands reproductive problems.

They say more testing is needed before any allegations can -- or should -- be made about the dog food.

I believe these cases are too poorly defined to try to make any sort of statement regarding the likelihood of diet as the cause of the the problem, said Dr. Margaret Root Kustritz of the University of Minnesotas College of Veterinary Medicine. She is a nationally recognized expert in theriogenology, which is animal reproduction.

I know of no such problem specific to Newfoundlands. I know of no data in the veterinary literature documenting loss of pups from dietary causes in apparently healthy (female).

Dr. Root Kustritz asked other animal reproduction specialists about the Newfoundlands problems.

I have gotten two responses, neither of which noted any increase in such problems in Newfies in their areas. That means eastern Canada, the upper Midwest, and the Pacific Northwest are not seeing a problem recognized by theriogenologists or their clients.

She added: I believe this mystery is suffering from a lack of diagnostic testing. Breeders will tell you all these tests cost money. They do. So does repeated loss of pups.

Dr. Jennifer Larsen, a veterinarian and trained nutritionist with Davis Veterinary Medical Consulting group in California, said there are a number of reasons why dogs fail to get pregnant. Or have reproductive success.

Those factors include timing, semen samples, genetics, viruses, and the environment.

Nutrition also plays a key role.

Reproduction is a demanding physical state and you have to be careful about the diet you feed, said Dr. Larsen, who owns Newfoundlands. But to find out whats going on nutritionally (in these cases) would take some scientific investigation. If they (the breeders) were unable to participate in that, than were just speculating.

Dr. Larsen also said previous reproductive success doesnt guarantee the same results in the future.

The way genes are resorted can result in a bunch of different effects. Its like people who five or six children and not all of them look the same.

Past success or good luck has nothing to do with future good luck or success.

Dr. Larsen, however, said these cases should be more thoroughly examined.

Its unfortunate whats gone on. And there are a lot of pieces to the puzzle that need to be put in place.

At this point, its premature to say its the food. But I hope these breeders work with their veterinarians to try and figure out whats going on. That could help advance knowledge in this field.

Lisa consulted her veterinarian, Dr. Lori Hunt at the Center West Animal Hospital in Westlake, Ohio.

One of things I do with my breeding clients is when we have a dog thats missing, the first thing we look into is what theyre eating, said Dr. Hunt, who devotes much of her practice to canine reproduction. Nutrition can absolutely effect conception. And its certainly possible that something could be out of whack nutritionally ... maybe the manufacturer changed the formula.

But I cant say its the food. There are other people who feed that same food and they havent had this trouble.

Dr. Hunt said animals -- like humans -- sometimes develop problems that simply cant be explained.

I know the science of things and bad things sometimes happen for no reason.

Nonetheless, the Newfoundlands problems piqued her professional interest.

It certainly makes you think ... anything is possible.

Newfoundland Club of America To Explore Problem

The Newfoundlands reproductive issues also captured the attention of the Newfoundland Club of America (NCA).

I find this very odd, said Pam Rubio, head of NCAs Health and Longevity Committee. I have not heard of this before. But there are lots of things that have never happened before that crop up.

Does she suspect the food?

I would doubt it because so many of us feed Pro Plan without any problems. If its the food -- and Im still doubtful of that -- then it would have to be a change in the formula, the protein source, or an ingredient.

Rubio, however, said she would discuss this issue with members of her committee.

Ill put it out there for us to explore. If there are more cases out there, we definitely want to know and see if we can find a common cause.

The NCA cant offer breeders any financial assistance, Rubio said.

But the organization can recommend -- and help fund -- research about specific issues facing the breed.

If researchers want to do a study on this, we do have the Newfoundland Health Challenge and the Research Advisory Committee that decides who gets funding for studies.

Purina Investigates Breeders Concerns

ConsumerAffairs.com also contacted Purina about the Newfoundlands problems. Spokesman Keith Schopp told us his company had never heard of these problems until our call.

He also said the pet food giant has not changed the formulas for Purina One or Purina Pro Plan in recent years.

But we would like to talk to these breeders and get more information, Schopp told us.

After our calls to Purina, a company representative contacted the breeders and promised to investigate their concerns.

New Evidence

Meanwhile, new evidence has surfaced in this mystery evidence that might confirm the breeders' suspicions.

Lisa and Wendy contacted ConsumerAffairs.com on Tuesday and said they discovered some of the Purina food theyd fed their dogs when the problems first started.

Im in the process of revamping my kennel and when I got into one of the feed bins, I found some of the Purina at the bottom, Lisa says. I took back every bag of Purina I had after the recall, but I guess I didnt take back the food I dumped into the bin. With everything that has happened, I forgot the food was in there.

Lisa plans to immediately test the food.

So does Wendy, who also found some Purina in the bottom of one of her feed bins.

The breeders, however, says they dont need scientific data to convince them the food caused their dogs problems. Their dogs -- and the awful experiences theyve endured -- are all the proof they need.

We know what we saw and we know what happened, Lisa says.

Dogs Doing Better Off Purina

They also know their dogs conditions have improved since they took them off Purina products months ago.

The difference is unbelievable, says Wendy, who makes her own dog food and supplements it with a brand called Bil-Jac. That Ohio pet food maker uses locally produced ingredients. My dogs are looking so good. My younger ones are slowly starting to gain weight now that theyre off that poisonous food. I cant see their ribs anymore. And theyre a lot more active.

Lisa makes her own dog food.

And she says her Newfoundlands are much healthier now that theyre off Purina.

Their coats are a lot shinier, theyre more active, and their skin problems have cleared up.

Twelve Happy Endings

This mystery has an even happier ending. Make that 12 happy endings.

Earlier this month, one of Wendys dogs delivered five healthy puppies.

Everyone is OK, Wendy says. Im sure its because I took (my female) off Purina. Ill never feed Purina again.

And Lisas dog, Juliet -- who had three mummified fetuses in her previous litter -- delivered seven healthy puppies over the Fourth Of July holiday.

My biggest fear has always been the lasting effect this will have on my dogs reproductive systems, Lisa says. Theres no doubt in my mind why this was a healthy litter ... Juliet was not on Purina.



Newfoundland Breeders Despair After Deaths and Deformities...

Article Image

Pet Food Company Denies Claim for Dead Dog


Claim denied.

Thats the message a grieving Arizona pet owner received on Monday from the insurance carrier for Nutro Products, one of the companies involved in the nationwide pet food recall.

Pet owner Jerri L. filed a claim with the company to recoup the $700 in vet bills she incurred trying to save her 13-year-old Sheltie, Sandyboy.

As ConsumerAffairs.com first reported in April, Sandyboy suddenly went into kidney failure after eating one of the recalled Nutro Max foods.

He was a perfectly healthy dog and then I put him on that food, and boom, within two weeks, he was gone, Jerri told us. His immediate symptoms were going off by himself, being very lethargic, and not eating or drinking as much as he did. Then he started getting diarrhea and wouldnt take in any fluids.

Our vet confirmed he went into complete kidney failure and there was no reason for his kidneys to fail. We had to make the difficult decision to put him to sleep.

That happened in May 2006 ten months before Menu Foods recalled 60 million containers of melamine-tainted pet food.

Jerri, however, is convinced that Sandyboys death is linked to the Nutro Max pet food.

All our other dogs ate Pedigree and theyre fine. Hes the only one who got sick. He was a healthy 13-year-old dog until he started eating that food. So yes, Im certain theres a connected between the food and his death.

The Hartford insurance company disagrees.

Our investigation has determined that our insured is not responsible for this very unfortunate incident, the company wrote in a letter to Jerri. The basis for this decision is in light of the fact that while your pet may have consumed some of the recalled product, testing of your pet has revealed that your pet was not ill (or the illness is not related to the recalled pet food).

Accordingly, there is no property damage as a result of the insureds product. Based upon the above, this will advise that there is no legal liability on the part of Nutro Products, Inc. for the alleged damages.

Not Giving Up

Sandyboy

Despite the companys denial, Jerris not ready to give up her fight.

She plans to join one of the class action lawsuits filed in connection with the pet food recall.

I want my $700 and I want an admission by the company that they were wrong, the Goodyear, Arizona woman told us today. I dont think anyone did this (contaminated the pet food) purposely. But I think the company needs to take care of what occurred.

She adds: It makes me sick to think that I killed my dog. I could barely live with decision to put him down and now to think I may have killed him inadvertently. I could have taken it if hed died of old age. But not this Im just heartsick over this whole thing.

The Food and Drug Administration discovered two ingredients used to make the recalled pet foods -- wheat gluten and rice protein concentrate -- contained melamine. That chemical is not approved for use in pet or human food; its used to make plastics and pesticides.

FDA officials traced the melamine-tainted ingredients to two companies in China, which exported the products to the United States. Those Chinese companies are now closed.

Since March, Menu Foods and other pet food makers have recalled more than 5,600 pet food products sold under at least 100 brand namesmaking this one of the largest pet food recalls in U.S. history.

This whole thing has gotten so crazy, Jerri says. I dont feel safe giving my other six dogs commercial foods anymore. Thats why Im looking at giving them natural foods.



Pet Food Company Denies Claim for Dead Dog...

FDA Disputes Pet Food Pain Killer Findings


The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is disputing the findings of a Texas laboratory that reported it discovered the pain killer acetaminophen in some brands of pet food.

The FDA said it didnt find acetaminophen in a handful of samples of dog and cat food it tested in the past week, according to The Pittsburgh Tribune-Review.

"We cannot validate their finding, Julie Zawisza, assistant commissioner of public affairs for the FDA told the newspaper.

But ConsumerAffairs.com learned the FDA cannot confirm it tested the same lots and brands in which the Texas laboratory -- ExperTox, Inc. -- detected the pain medication.

This case is not closed, Donna Coneley, lab manager with ExperTox, Inc. told us. Theyre (FDA) still requesting samples and data from us. Weve talked to them three times today. I dont see by any means that this is over. If it was over and done with, why would they bother spending so much time with us on the phone and arranging for samples to be released?

Asked about the FDAs comment to the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review, Coneley responded: I dont know their reasoning. What I do know is that when they told me they tested a few samples of cat and dog food, I asked them if they were the same lots and brands that we tested. And they couldnt confirm that any of them were the same ones we tested.

Were using two completely different testing instruments to detect those chemical, and the difference comes into play with the instruments and the instrumentation (used) to detect those chemical, she added.

Coneley said her lab tested 100 to 150 samples of pet food -- and detected acetaminophen in five of those samples.

The FDA, she said, tested just a few samples of pet food for the pain killer.

Its easier to say that we cant confirm something by looking at a few samples than to really investigate and continue investigating until you know something for sure, Coneley said. I think this might have been a quick way to get everyone off their (FDA) backs.

"Imaginary Experts"

Could those everyones be the Pet Food Institute (PFI), which represents the makers of 98 percent of all dog and cat food produced in the United States and calls itself the voice of U.S. pet food manufacturers?

Maybe there was pressure from them, Coneley said.

As we reported on Wednesday, PFI cast doubts on ExperToxs finding.

Through our contacts in Texas, which is where the lab is located that conducted the analysis, we have learned there is genuine concern among key toxicological and analytical experts about the lab and the actual test results, said PFI spokesman Kurt Gallagher.

Coneley questioned what experts PFI was talking about.

They never name the experts theyre working with, she said on Wednesday. When someone says people I know say this, it sounds to me like theyre trying to say there are experts who have looked into this and dont agree with the findings. But I dont believe there are.

To me, it sounds like theyre talking about imaginary experts. The (scientists at the) FDA are the only people weve been talking to about our findings.

Coneley told us today that her lab will continue working closely with the FDA and hopes to foster its relationship with that federal agency.

We dont want to build any animosity with the FDA, she said. Its in our best interest to help them see what were seeing.

Other Contaminants

As we reported, acetaminophen isnt the only contaminant ExperTox discovered in the samples of pet food it tested in May.

The lab found the chemical cyanuric acid -- commonly used in pool chlorination -- in some samples.

And in other samples, it detected the chemical that triggered the March 2007 recall of millions of containers of dog and cat food: melamine.

The FDA discovered melamine in the wheat gluten and rice protein concentrate imported from China and used in the more than 5,600 products that pet food makers have recalled in the past three months.

The chemical -- used to make plastics and fertilizers -- is blamed for the illnesses and deaths of thousands of pets nationwide. It is not approved for use in pet or human food.

ExperTox did not identify the brands of food it tested because of a confidentiality agreement.

Menu Foods

But ConsumerAffairs.com confirmed one of the brands that tested positive for acetaminophen is Menu Foods Pet Pride.

Pet owner Don Earl of Port Townsend, Washington, told us he hired ExperTox to analyze samples of Pet Pride "Turkey and Giblets Dinner" and Pet Pride "Mixed Grill.

He says he took that action because his cat Chuckles suffered kidney disease and died in January after eating those flavors of Pet Pride food.

He also told us that ExperTox analyzed the same lots and styles of Pet Pride food that he fed Chuckles before she died.

We reviewed ExperToxs findings of the samples Earl submitted, which confirmed the lab detected acetaminophen in the food.

The tests also detected cyanuric acid in the samples of Pet Pride food. Those samples, however, did not contain any melamine, the report stated.

Menu Foods declined to comment on ExperToxs finding and referred calls to the PFI.

As usual, the FDA did not return our telephone calls or e-mails seeking comment.

Pet owner Earl, however, criticized the FDA for making what he called unsubstantiated claims about ExperTox and its findings.

At the time of the article, the FDA had not tested any of the samples tested by ExperTox, he told us today. It is also of interest that in an attempt to get a second opinion on one of the two varieties of pet food I had tested by ExperTox, I submitted a separate sample to UC Davis, only to later find that UC Davis is a major recipient of pet food company funding. Under the circumstances, it is my firmly held belief that if the FDA is going to make these kinds of unsubstantiated claims, their methods should be publicly examined along side those on the cutting edge of these findings.

He added: It has been three months since the recall was announced and pet owners still don't have any hard answers as to how and why this happened, or what is safe to feed their pets.



FDA Disputes Pet Food Pain Killer Findings...

Article Image

Menu Foods Samples Test Positive for Painkiller

Two of the pet food samples that tested positive for the painkiller acetaminophen are Menu Foods Pet Pride "Turkey and Giblets Dinner" and Pet Pride "Mixed Grill, ConsumerAffairs.com has learned.

As we reported last week, a Texas laboratory discovered acetaminophen in about a half dozen samples of pet food tested in May.

The lab did not disclose the pet food brands because of a confidentiality agreement.

After our story was published, however, we heard from a consumer who paid ExperTox Inc. of Deer Park, Texas to analyze samples of pet food.

That consumer is Don Earl, who says his cat Chuckles went into kidney failure and died in January 2007 after eating Pet Pride Turkey and Giblets and Mixed Grill cat food.

The Port Townsend, Washington, pet owner said he had the same lots and styles of Pet Pride food tested that he fed Chuckles before she died.

And those tests detected acetaminophen in the food, ConsumerAffairs.com confirmed.

The tests also discovered the chemical cyanuric acid -- commonly used in pool chlorination -- in the food.

No Melamine

Tests on the brands of Pet Pride food that Chuckles ate, however, did not detect the chemical that triggered the nationwide recall of millions of container of pet food earlier this year: melamine.

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) discovered melamine in the wheat gluten and rice protein concentrate imported from China and used in the more than 5,600 products that pet food makers have recalled in the past three months.

That chemical is blamed for the illnesses and deaths of thousands of pets nationwide.

Melamine is used to make plastics and fertilizers. It is not approved for use in pet or human food.

Chuckles

Pet owner Earl isnt surprised that ExperTox scientists didnt find melamine in the brands of food that Chuckles ate. Those Pet Pride brands are not included the massive recall.

Melamine has impressed me as being a red herring since day one, Earl told us. The substance has been the subject of credible scientific tests and studies for decades. Nothing supports the theory it could be lethal even in amounts 10 times the highest reported to be present in the food. As to why no one is finding other toxins in the food, the simple explanation is no one is looking for other toxins in the food.

Since Earls beloved Chuckles died, he has researched the pet food recall and created the Pet Food Recall Facts Web site.

Test Results

His Web site includes a copy of ExperToxs results on the Pet Pride food he had tested.

It also includes results on two other dry pet food samples the lab tested. The brands of those pet foods are not identified on ExperToxs toxicology reports, but reveal the lab detected acetaminophen in one case and acetaminophen and cyanuric acid in the other.

The sample was received in an open or zip lock bag, one of the toxicology reports states. The laboratory does not warrant that this is the actual product listed. The product and lot number, if provided, was noted on the sample received by the client -- not the laboratory.

The report adds: Testing of the above product does not warrant that all products of this particular brand, lot or batch, will produce the same results or indicate that the entire product line is safe or not safe for consumption This analysis is based on a small, representative sample of the product provided and does not constitute full analysis of the entire product line, lot(s) or batches.

ConsumerAffairs.com contacted the manufacturer of the confirmed pet food that tested positive for acetaminophen -- Menu Foods of Canada. That company makes Pet Pride food.

A spokeswoman for Menu Food said the company had no comment on ExperToxs findings. But spokeswoman Sarah Tuite told us: The Pet Food Institute (PFI) has provided comment.

That organization represents the makers of 98 percent of all dog and cat food produced in the United States, and calls itself the voice of U.S. pet food manufacturers.

I can assure you that this industry takes the issue of the safety of pet food products with the utmost seriousness, PFIs spokesman Kurt Gallagher said Tuesday.

Gallagher said his industry and the FDA are investigating ExperToxs findings. But he cast doubts about the laboratory and its test results.

Through our contacts in Texas, which is where the lab is located that conducted the analysis, we have learned there is genuine concern among key toxicological and analytical experts about the lab and the actual test results, Gallagher said.

The Lab Manager for ExperTox told us today that her company stands by its finding.

What Experts?

Expertoxs Donna Coneley also said she doesnt have any idea what Texas experts Gallagher and PFI are talking about.

They never name the experts theyre working with, Coneley said. When someone says people I know say this, it sounds to me like theyre trying to say there are experts who have looked into this and dont agree with the findings. But I dont believe there are.

To me, it sounds like theyre talking about imaginary experts, Coneley said.

Coneley said the only experts her lab has worked with about the findings are those with the FDA. In fact, she told us she had the FDA on another line during our interview today.

The pet food manufacturing companies have had ten-minute discussions with us about how we did our tests, she said. But theyre not experts.

The (scientists at the) FDA are the only people weve been talking to about our findings.

Coneley said her lab tested about 100 to 150 samples of food.

When asked if she was surprised the lab didnt detect melamine in the samples of Pet Pride it tested, she said: We did find that (chemical) in other samples. I dont have my paperwork in front of me to tell you how many samples, but I can tell you we did find melamine in some. We also found melamine and cyanuric acid in some samples.

But ExperTox did not find the rat poison and cancer drug, Aminopterin, in any of the pet food it tested, Coneley said.

Scientists at the New York State Department of Agriculture discovered that toxin in some samples of pet food it tested shortly after Menu Foods announced its recall in March.

Don't Look, Don't Find

In the meantime, pet owner Earl wonders why the countrys leading laboratories arent imitating ExperToxs tests.

They're using a protocol to quickly scan for thousands of substances. Once having identified a substance using that method, they are then able to run more specific tests to confirm the results.

The question that comes to my mind is with so many people affected, and so many people needing hard answers to how this happened, why the nations top labs are limiting their tests to what they read in the morning's paper? You won't find what you don't look for.

A Lost Customer

In related news, Menu Foods announced on Monday that a significant customer will no longer buy cuts and gravy products from the company.

That unidentified customer represented 11 percent of the companys total sales in 2006, Menu Foods said.

The news caused Menus stock (TSX: MEW.UN) to plummet. Menus stock opened at $3.09 today and dropped to a low of $2.30 a unit.

According to published reports, the company lost $17.5 million in the first quarter.

Menu Foods has said the pet food recall will cost the company at least $45 million and that figure doesnt include legal settlement not covered by insurance. The company now faces 90-class action lawsuits, TheStar.com, a Canadian publication, reported.

In May, Menu Foods posted claims information on its Web Site for pet owners whose dogs or cats became sick or died after eating the tainted food.

But legal authorities have intervened. Visitors to the site are now finding this notice:

On May 24, 2007, a United States federal court issued an order that, for the time being, prevents Menu Foods from having direct contact with individual U.S. pet owners. In light of the order, we regret that we cannot communicate with you at this time. As soon as the court permits, we intend to resume efforts to resolve claims directly with pet owners. We will post additional information when we are able.


Menu Foods Samples Test Positive for Painkiller...

Tests Find Pain Killer in Pet Food


Theres more troubling news for pet owners, who have worried for the past few months if the food they give their dogs and cats is safe. Or tainted with the chemical melamine, which can cause kidney failure or death.

A Texas laboratory says its uncovered the pain killer acetaminophen in samples of pet food.

According to a report by KTRK in Houston, technicians at the medical testing laboratory, EperTox, discovered the popular pain killer is at least a half dozen pet food samples.

The Deer Park, Texas, laboratory did not disclose the brands of the foods tested because of a confidentiality agreement.

"We don't really how big and how involved this problem is right now, the labs Dr. Ernest Lykissa told KTRK. We are only uncovering the beginning of it.

The lab tested more than a thousand samples of different pet food for the past month, according to KTRK. In more than two dozen samples, the lab discovered either cyanuric acid or acetaminophen in the foods.

The highest level of acetaminophen found in the samples was 2 milligrams per gram of dog food.

Fatal to Cats

Veterinarians say that concentration could make a dog sick and would kill a cat.

Our data show that if an average-sized cat ingests as little as one extra-strength acetaminophen pain-reliever caplet and is not treated in time, it can suffer fatal consequences, said Dr. Steven Hansen, a board-certified toxicologist and senior vice president with the American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (ASPCA).

He manages the organizations Animal Poison Control Center (APCC), in Urbana, Illinois and called this latest discovery extremely worrying.

His organization issued a statement this week urging pet owners to keep a close eye on their dogs and cats in the wake of this new finding.

Depending on the amount ingested, clinical effects can include a condition called methemoglobinemia, which affects the ability of blood cells to deliver oxygen to vital organs, or even liver damage, Hansen said. At this point, we have very little information as to the actual level and concentration of this reported contamination, so its extremely important to be able to recognize any potential warning signs of this kind of poisoning.

Hansen, however, said early information indicates the concentration levels of the pain killer are not high enough to have an adverse effect on most dogs.

But cats, he and other veterinarians warn, are more at-risk.

Cats are especially sensitive to acetaminophen toxicity for two reasons, said Dr. Louise Murray, director of medicine at the ASPCAs Bergh Memorial Animal Hospital in New York City, and a board-certified internist.

First, they dont have enough of a specific enzyme that enables the body to metabolize the drug well. Second, cats are typically more susceptible to red blood cell damage than certain other species of animals. Put these together with a high dose of acetaminophen, and you have a potentially deadly combination.

Veterinarians say the most common effects of acetaminophen poisoning in cats are swelling of the face and paws, depression; weakness; and difficulty in breathing.

We also see a condition called cyanosis, which is literally when their gums and tongue start turning a muddy color due to the lack of oxygen, Dr. Hansen said.

FDA is Mum

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has not commented on this discovery by EperTox.

In the meantime, ASPCA says pet owners should immediately contact their veterinarian if their dogs and cats show any signs of illness.

This new finding by Expertox increases the fears that pet owners nationwide have faced since March, when Menu Foods announced a massive recall of 60 million containers of tainted dog and cat food.

The FDA discovered the food was contaminated with melamine, a chemical used in plastics and fertilizers. It is not, however, approved for use in pet or human foods.

Menu and several other companies have since recalled more than 5,600 pet food products that contain melamine-tainted ingredients.

The FDA learned two companies in China export the tainted ingredients wheat gluten and rice protein concentrate -- to the United States.

FDA inspectors also discovered those companies intentionally added melamine to the ingredients to increase the protein content.

The presence of melamine in the pet food is blamed for the deaths and illnesses of thousands of cats and dogs in the United States.

Pet food makers in South Africa also received shipments of melamine-tainted corn gluten from China, which is linked to the deaths and illness of hundreds of dogs and cats in that country.

China Reacts

To counter the mounting global pressure its faced in the wake of the pet food recall, China announced last week that it has set up a monitoring system to ensure the safety of its exported food.

"Over the past two years, 99 percent of food exported to the United States was up to safety standards, which is a very high percentage," said Li Yuanping, senior official in charge of imported and exported food safety in the General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine (GAQSIQ).

His comments appeared on the Chinese Governments Official Web site,GOV.cn.

Chinese companies that export food must meet safety requirements before producing, processing, and exporting food, Li said. He also said his country will regularly inspect companies during production.

Chinese officials said the two companies that exported the melamine-tainted ingredients to the United States -- Xuzhou Anying Biologic Technology Development Company and Binzhou Futian Biology Technology, Ltd. -- eluded Chinas inspections because they declared the items as non-food products.

Li also said his country has ordered more stringent inspection on all vegetable proteins, like wheat gluten and rice protein concentrate. His country will also include vegetable proteins on exports list, which are subject for quality check-ups.

Li also reported that his country checked 399 samples -- from 173 exporters -- and did not find any melamine-tainted products.

China has also faced criticism in recent weeks after the FDA discovered a poisonous chemical in toothpastes imported from that country.

The FDA said it received reports in late May that several countries -- including Panama -- had received toothpastes imported from China that were contaminated with the chemical diethylene glycol (DEG).

The FDA has since banned all toothpastes made in China from the United States.

The Chinese-imported toothpastes that contain DEG are usually sold at bargain stores and include the following brands: Cooldent Fluoride; Cooldent Spearmint; Cooldent ICE; Dr. Cool, Everfresh Toothpaste; Superdent Toothpaste; Clean Rite Toothpaste; Oralmax Extreme; Oral Bright Fresh Spearmint Flavor; Bright Max Peppermint Flavor; ShiR Fresh Mint Fluoride Paste; DentaPro; DentaKleen; and DentaKleen Junior.

A recent investigation by ConsumerAffairs.com discovered 17 tubes of illegally imported toothpaste in discount stores in the Washington D.C.-area. The tubes were all manufactured in other countries and not intended for sale in the U.S. One tube of toothpaste came from China.

The deaths of at least 100 people in Panama last month are blamed on cough syrup tainted with DEG. According to The New York Times, China produced the DEG-tainted cough syrup and exported the product as the harmless glycerin. It was then used in Panama to make the cough syrup.

Another pet food company has recalled bags of its dry dog food, but this time it's not because the food contains melamine-tainted ingredients imported from China.

Doane Pet Care is recalling a single lot of 55 pound bags of OlRoy Complete Nutrition dry dog food because they may be contaminated with salmonella.

The Manassas, Virginia-based company sold the food at 69 Wal-Mart stores in Maryland, North Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Virginia, and West Virginia. The company produced the potentially contaminated food at one facility in Virginia.

The recalled bags of food have the USC Code 6 05388 72076 4, the lot number 04 0735 1, and the Best Buy Date Apr 13 08.

This voluntary recall has been issued because FDA (the Food and Drug Administration) detected Salmonella in the product, the company said on its Web site. Doane Pet Care has not confirmed the presence of Salmonella, despite extensive independent testing of duplicate samples.

The company said it has not received any reports of illnesses linked to the food. It did, however, warn pet owners who handled the food that they may be exposed to salmonella -- especially if they do not thoroughly wash their hands after coming into contact with the product.

Salmonella is a bacteria found in the intestines that can cause food poising and gastroenteritis.

The company said pet owners should immediately stop feeding the food to their dogs.

A complete list of stores that sold the recalled food can be found on the companys Web site: www.doanepetcare.com/recall/stores.

Pet owners with questions about the recall can also call the company at 1- 800-624-7387.

Doane Pet Care emphasized this action is not connected to the massive recall of millions of bags of dog and cat food -- contaminated with the chemical melamine -- announced in March.

The presence of that chemical triggered one of the largest pet food recalls in U.S. history. Its also blamed for the deaths and illnesses of thousands of dogs and cats nationwide.

The FDA discovered melamine in the wheat gluten, corn gluten and rice protein imported from China and used to make the pet foods.



Tests Find Pain Killer in Pet Food...

Doane Pet Food Recalls Batch of Ol' Roy Dog Food


Another pet food company has recalled bags of its dry dog food, but this time it's not because the food contains melamine-tainted ingredients imported from China.

Doane Pet Care is recalling a single lot of 55 pound bags of OlRoy Complete Nutrition dry dog food because they may be contaminated with salmonella.

The Manassas, Virginia-based company sold the food at 69 Wal-Mart stores in Maryland, North Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Virginia, and West Virginia. The company produced the potentially contaminated food at one facility in Virginia.

The recalled bags of food have the USC Code 6 05388 72076 4, the lot number 04 0735 1, and the Best Buy Date Apr 13 08.

This voluntary recall has been issued because FDA (the Food and Drug Administration) detected Salmonella in the product, the company said on its Web site. Doane Pet Care has not confirmed the presence of Salmonella, despite extensive independent testing of duplicate samples.

The company said it has not received any reports of illnesses linked to the food. It did, however, warn pet owners who handled the food that they may be exposed to salmonella -- especially if they do not thoroughly wash their hands after coming into contact with the product.

Salmonella is a bacteria found in the intestines that can cause food poising and gastroenteritis.

The company said pet owners should immediately stop feeding the food to their dogs.

A complete list of stores that sold the recalled food can be found on the companys Web site: www.doanepetcare.com/recall/stores.

Pet owners with questions about the recall can also call the company at 1- 800-624-7387.

Doane Pet Care emphasized this action is not connected to the massive recall of millions of bags of dog and cat food -- contaminated with the chemical melamine -- announced in March.

The presence of that chemical triggered one of the largest pet food recalls in U.S. history. Its also blamed for the deaths and illnesses of thousands of dogs and cats nationwide.

The FDA discovered melamine in the wheat gluten, corn gluten and rice protein imported from China and used to make the pet foods.



Doane Pet Food Recalls Batch of Ol' Roy Dog Food...

Two U.S. Companies Recall Melamine-Tainted Feed

China, it turns out, isnt the only country that spikes its feed products with the industrial chemical melamine.

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration is alerting livestock and fish/shrimp feed manufacturers about a voluntary recall of U.S.-made products used in feed production because several have been found to contain melamine and related compounds.

The finding is likely to relieve some of the pressure on China, which has been roundly condemned for being lax, and even corrupt, in its food safety practices. Earlier this week, China's former food and drug safety chief was sentenced to death for what was termed "massive corruption."

The severe sentence was seen as a sign that the Chinese government wanted to make a strong statement about its determination to clean up shortcomings in its health and safety policies.

The feed ingredients were made by Tembec BTLSR Inc. of Toledo, Ohio and Uniscope, Inc. of Johnstown, Colo. Both U.S. firms have instituted recalls of the tainted products.

Tembec, a contract manufacturer for Uniscope, makes AquaBond and Aqua-Tec II, which it distributes for Uniscope. Uniscope makes Xtra-Bond using ingredients supplied by Tembec. All of the products are binding agents that are used to make pelleted feed for cattle, sheep, and goats, or fish and shrimp.

The companies have confirmed that Tembec added melamine as part of the formulation of the products to improve the binding properties of pelleted feed. Melamine is not approved as an additive for animal or fish/shrimp feed.

The companies have stopped adding melamine to the feed products, the agency said.

Based on the levels of melamine and related compounds in the initial ingredients, FDA estimated the probable level of melamine and related compounds in livestock feed as less than 50 parts per million (ppm) based on the recommended mix rate of two to four pounds of binding agent per ton of livestock feed.

The estimated levels in fish and shrimp feed are less than 233 ppm and 465 ppm, respectively, of melamine and related compounds. The estimated levels of melamine and related compounds vary in the livestock feed and the fish and shrimp feed because of differing levels of melamine in the binding agents used for each type of feed.

FDA said it is advising feed manufacturers and others who mix their own feed not to use these products, and to contact the manufacturers. FDA advises feed manufacturers to recall finished feed that is made from AquaBond or Aqua-Tec II due to the estimated levels of melamine and related compounds in the finished products.

FDA believes that no recall is warranted of the finished feed made from Xtra-Bond based on the estimated levels of melamine and related compounds in the finished product and based on currently available data and information.

The estimated melamine levels in feed made with these binding agents are similar to the levels discussed in the interim safety/risk assessment of melamine and related compounds made available by FDA earlier this month.

In that assessment, federal scientists determined that, based on currently available data and information, the consumption of pork, chicken, domestic fish, and eggs from animals inadvertently fed animal feed contaminated with melamine and its analogues is very unlikely to pose a human health risk.

FDA officials said the risk from the melamine is extremely small. The interim safety/risk assessment concludes that in the most extreme risk assessment scenario, when scientists assumed that all the solid food a person consumes in an entire day contained melamine and the melamine compound cyanuric acid in equal amounts, the potential exposure is about 250 times lower than the dose considered safe.

Translated to consumption levels, this means that a person weighing 132 pounds would have to eat more than 800 pounds per day of food containing melamine and its compounds to approach a level of consumption that would cause a health concern, the FDA said.

While that may be true for humans, melamine in pet food products is suspected of killing or injuring thousands of dogs and cats.

FDA is encouraging domestic feed suppliers to be vigilant in quality control in their supply chain and to monitor for any improper additives, including melamine and its analogs.

The Tembec and Uniscope products also reportedly contain a urea formaldehyde resin-type ingredient, a raw ingredient used to make the binding agent in these products. FDA said it is investigating this use of the urea formaldehyde resin-type ingredient in the Tembec and Uniscope products, and will take appropriate regulatory action if warranted.



Two U.S. Companies Recall Melamine-Tainted Feed...

Nutra Nuggets Recalled as Melamine Poisonings Continue


The recall of melamine-tainted pet food continues as Diamond Pet Foods pulls a limited number of 40-pound bags of Nutra Nuggets Lamb Meal and Rice dry dog food off the market.

Meanwhile in Canada, the Humane Society is calling for a criminal investigation of Menu Foods and other processors involved in the disastrous wave of pet food contamination.

The Nutra Nuggets follows reports by ConsumerAffairs.com earlier this week that samples of Nutra Nuggets tested positive for melamine and had caused kidney problems in at least four dogs in California.

The Missouri-based Diamond Pet Foods announced its recall of the product yesterday and cited melamine cross contamination as the reason.

The recalled product was manufactured at the same facility following production of other products that contained rice protein concentrate later found to be tainted with melamine, which is not an approved food substance Diamond said in a press release posted on the companys Web site.

The company said its manufacturing plant in Lathrop, California, produced the tainted food and distributed it to retailers in Arizona, California, Nevada, Oregon, Washington, and British Columbia, Canada.

The 40-pound bags of recalled Nutra Nuggets have the production codes of NLR0404A2SL or NLR0404B2SL, Best Before Oct. 9, 2008. No other Nutra Nuggets products are involved in this action.

Diamond Pet Foods said pet owners should immediately stop feeding their dogs the recalled Nutra Nuggets.

Pet owners with questions about this food -- or any other Diamond product -- can call the company at 1-866-214-6945.

Canada Inquiry

In Canada, the Humane Society is putting pressure on the government to investigate Ontario-based Menu Foods and other pet food makers. The group says its still waiting for an answer from government officials.

The society said it made formal requests to Canadas Prime Minister, the Royal Canadian Mounted Police, called and the Ontario Securities Commission and other securities regulators asking them to conduct their own independent investigations to determine if criminal animal cruelty charges and securities charges should be laid.

We need hard answers about the names of key officials at these pet food companies. We need to find out what they knew about the problems, when they knew about it and if there were any delays in alerting the public and government agencies, said the animal charity's Western Regional Director Al Hickey.

Unlike other countries, here in Canada, for all intents and purposes, pet food companies are allowed to regulate themselves, with disastrous results. There are over 13 million dogs and cats living with their families across Canada and we need to do everything in our power to protect them right now. We need to take care of our own, said Hickey.

The group says any investigation should have four primary objectives:

1) to determine if criminal animal cruelty charges should be brought before the court;

2) to determine if charges should be brought with respect to insider trading by shareholders in pet food companies;

3) hold public hearings into how to best regulate the pet food industry;

4) to pass new laws to regulate the pet food industry.

Since the initial recall the number of other pet food companies, including Del Monte, Hills Pet Nutrition, Nestle Purina, Royal Canin and Sunshine Mills, product recalls continue to grow and now include more than 150 brand names and over 5,600 products.

The Canadian group notes that the pet food crisis continues to worsen and has now spread to the human food supply with contaminated "scrap pet food" fed to hogs and chickens; and contaminated feed ingredients from China fed to farmed fish.

The society cites published reports, indicating that Ontario based Menu Foods has received more than 300,000 complaints and there have been reports of deaths as high as 39,000 in the U.S. alone. Menu Foods says there have been only 16 confirmed pet deaths.

The Canadian group complains that U.S. officials and agencies have taken the lead in exposing the contamination, while Canada has done little.

Whatever you may say or think about U.S. politicians, they care about animals, said Humane Society of Canada's Chairman & CEO, Michael O'Sullivan. Here in Canada, the inaction and arrogance of Canadian politicians and civil servants is truly breath-taking.

Detective Work

California veterinarian Matt Humason of the Lone Oak Veterinary Clinic in Visalia, became suspicious of the Nutra Nuggets after four of his clients healthy dogs suddenly went into renal failure.

I saw the first two dogs around the beginning of May, Dr. Humason told ConsumerAffairs.com. These were normal, healthy dogs and they both had become lethargic, one was vomiting, they werent eating, and they were drinking lots of water.

Dr. Humason ran blood tests on the dogs and discovered they were both in renal failure.

At first I thought maybe somebody threw something over the fence and thats what made these dogs sick, he told us. The pet food recall didnt cross my mind because these dogs were both eating dry food and their food wasnt on the recall list.

A few days later, however, Dr. Humason saw another dog with the same symptoms.

This was a younger Lab who was also a healthy dog, but now was sick and vomiting, and in renal failure. The owners happened to bring in their other Lab, who is older, and wanted that dog tested, too. That dog didnt have any symptoms, but test shows its kidney values were elevated, too.

Using his own detective skills, Dr. Humason uncovered the following clues that helped him solve the mystery of these ailing dogs:

• All four dogs -- Labs and Lab-mixes -- ate Nutra Nuggets dry food;

• The dogs owners had purchased the food from the same Costco store in Visalia, California;

• The dogs owners made those purchases within days of each other -- in Mid-April.

To confirm his suspicions, Dr. Humason decided to have the food tested.

I sent samples to the California Animal Health and Food Safety Laboratory, which is working with the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), Dr. Humason said. And those samples tested positive for melamine.

Melamine

Melamine is a chemical used to make plastics and fertilizers. It is not approved for use in human or pet food.

The FDA, however, discovered melamine and melamine-related compounds in the wheat gluten and rice protein concentrate imported from China used to make many brands of pet food.

That finding triggered one of the largest pet food recalls in U.S. history. Since March, 18 companies have recalled more than 5,600 pet food products.

Thousands of dogs and cats that have eaten tainted foods have suffered kidney problems or died.

Dr. Humason said the four dogs hes treated for renal failure are improving.

The first two are going home (probably today) and their owner is going to give them fluids under their skin. This will keep them hydrated; what were trying to do is flush out the kidneys. Theyve been here for about a week on IV fluids. Theyre still not quite back to normal, but theyre happy and eating again.

He added: The second two dogs are still here and have been on IV fluids since May 10th. Theyre having a little harder time, but theyre doing much better and they may go home by the end of the week.

Dr. Humason says hes only treated a few cats for kidney problems since Menu Foods announced its massive recall of 60 million containers of wet pet food in March.

I was actually starting to think this was getting more overkill until this happened. But now Im looking for this all the time.

In fact, I saw two other dogs yesterday that were showing the same signs (of renal failure), he told us on Tuesday. I tested them, but their blood work came back normal as far as their kidneys were concerned. But I sent their food for testing because they were eating that same Nutra Nuggets as the other dogs and their owners had purchased it about the same time.

More about the Pet Food Recall ...

Nutra Nuggets Recalled as Melamine Poisonings Continue...

Article Image

Tests Find Melamine in Diamond Pet Foods Brands


Samples of another brand of dog food have tested positive for melamine and caused kidney problems in at least four dogs in California.

The dry dog food is Nutra Nuggets, manufactured by Diamond Pet Foods of Meta, Missouri.

Dr. Matt Humason of the Lone Oak Veterinary Clinic in Visalia, California, became suspicious of the pet food after four of his clients healthy dogs suddenly went into renal failure.

I saw the first two dogs around the beginning of May, Dr. Humason told ConsumerAffairs.com today. These were normal, healthy dogs and they both had become lethargic, one was vomiting, they werent eating, and they were drinking lots of water.

Dr. Humason ran blood tests on the dogs and discovered they were both in renal failure.

At first I thought maybe somebody threw something over the fence and thats what made these dogs sick, he says. The pet food recall didnt cross my mind because these dogs were both eating dry food and their food wasnt on the recall list.

A few days later, however, Dr. Humason saw another dog with the same symptoms.

This was a younger Lab who was also a healthy dog, but now was sick and vomiting, and in renal failure. The owners happened to bring in their other Lab, who is older, and wanted that dog tested, too. That dog didnt have any symptoms, but test shows its kidney values were elevated, too.

Using his own detective skills, Dr. Humason uncovered the following clues that helped him solve the mystery of these ailing dogs:

• All four dogs -- who are Labs and Lab-mixes -- ate Nutra Nuggets dry food;

• The dogs owners had purchased the food from the same Costco store in Visalia, California;

• The dogs owners made those purchases within days of each other -- in Mid-April.

To confirm his suspicions, Dr. Humason decided to have the food tested.

Positive for Melamine

I sent samples to the California Animal Health and Food Safety Laboratory, which is working with the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), Dr. Humason says. And those samples tested positive for melamine.

Melamine is a chemical used to make plastics and fertilizers. It is not approved for use in human or pet food.

The FDA, however, discovered melamine and melamine-related compounds in the wheat gluten and rice protein concentrate imported from China used to make many brands of pet food.

That finding triggered one of the largest pet food recalls in U.S. history. Since March, 18 companies have recalled more than 5,600 pet food products.

Thousands of dogs and cats that have eaten tainted foods have suffered kidney problems or died.

Dr. Humason says the four dogs hes treated for renal failure are improving.

The first two are going home (probably today) and their owner is going to give them fluids under their skin. This will keep them hydrated; what were trying to do is flush out the kidneys. Theyve been here for about a week on IV fluids. Theyre still not quite back to normal, but theyre happy and eating again.

He adds: The second two dogs are still here and have been on IV fluids since May 10th. Theyre having a little harder time, but theyre doing much better and they may go home by the end of the week.

Dr. Humason says hes only treated a few cats for kidney problems since Menu Foods announced its massive recall of 60 million containers of wet pet food in March.

I was actually starting to think this was getting more overkill until this happened, he says. But now Im looking for this all the time.

In fact, I saw two other dogs yesterday that were showing the same signs (of renal failure), he adds. I tested them, but their blood work came back normal as far as their kidneys were concerned. But I sent their food for testing because they were eating that same Nutra Nuggets as the other dogs and their owners had purchased it about the same time.

Dr. Humason says hes not sure if the food is from the same lot, though.

The first two owners dont have the bags of food anymore. And there are some questions about the lot numbers on those bags.

That could present problems for Diamond Pet Foods and its distributors. And also to pet owners who feed their dogs this brand of food.

Without the lot number, it might be difficult to know where the tainted bags were distributed. And if any are still on the market or in pet owners homes.

Costco Concerned

Were in a real quandary here, Craig Wilson, with Costcos Food Safety Department, told ConsumerAffairs.com today. Were not the only ones who were selling this product. This was not a Costco brand; this went to many other sellers of this item. What were trying to do is get the batch (lot) number.

He adds: This happened so long ago sometime in April. The turnaround time in Costco for these items in less than in a week in other words, they dont sit on our shelves for more than a week. Id be more concerned about stores where theres not that much turnaround.

A spokeswoman for Diamond Pet Foods called this an isolated incident. When asked if the tainted bags are still on store shelves, however, she said she wasnt sure.

Spokeswoman Becky Johnson also said Diamond Pet Foods is running its own tests on the Nutra Nuggets.

Were not disputing those finding (of melamine), she told ConsumerAffairs.com. Were just waiting for our own results. We anticipate well have those back late Wednesday or Thursday.

More Concerns about Diamond

Meanwhile, an Indiana pet owner contacted ConsumerAffairs.com on Sunday with concerns about another brand of Diamond Pet Foods.

Sharen C. of La Fontaine, Indiana, says her two dogs became sick after eating Diamonds Chicken Soup for the Dog Lovers Soul.

I normally cook for my dogs, but I wanted to supplement them with this brand, Sharen says, adding her dogs, Cassie and Star, are Lab-mixes. When I tried it, though, my dogs became sick. They were lethargic and had diarrhea. And this lasted for a couple days.

Sharen immediately stopped feeding the food to her dogs.

When their conditions improved about a week later she tried giving them the food again.

But they got sick again and had the same symptoms, she says. So this wasnt a coincidence. It made them sick -- twice. Sharen contacted Diamond Pet Foods, but says the company downplayed her concerns.

The response I got from the company were simply suggestions on how to feed my dogs.

But shortly after her call, Diamond recalled its Chicken Soup for Puppy Lovers Soul and Chicken Soup For Kitten Lovers Soul. The company, however, didnt recall the brand that made Sharens dogs sick Chicken Soup for the Dog Lovers Soul.

And I have no idea why they didnt recall that brand, she says. It definitely made my dogs sick.

Sharen says Cassie and Star havent eaten that brand of food in weeks. And theyre now doing fine.

Will she ever feed them another brand of commercial dog food?

No, Im just not comfortable using commercial pet food, Sharen says. I cook for my dogs and my advice would be that everyone should cook for their dogs.

Diamond Pet Foods in April recalled its Chicken Soup for the Kitten Lovers Soul and Chicken Soup for the Puppy Lovers Soul after the FDA confirmed the products contained melamine-tainted rice protein concentrate.

Diamond said those products were not formulated or labeled to contain rice proteinand that ingredient was added to the products as a manufacturing deviation by American Nutrition.

Diamond also said no other Chicken Soup brands of canned or dry pet food were included in the recall and none of the companys dry food contain rice protein or wheat gluten.

Regarding the concerns Sharen raised about Diamonds Chicken Soup for the Dog Lovers Soul, spokeswoman Becky Johnson said her company takes all customers calls seriously. And she promised to have someone with the company contact Sharen.

Johnson also said customers with concerns about any Diamond products should contact the company at 1-866-214-6945.

More about the Pet Food Recall ...

Tests Find Melamine in Diamond Pet Foods Brands...

Pet Owners Blame Nutro Products for their Dog's Illnesses


A California pet owner is furious that Nutro Products continues to claim its dry dog foods are safe.That companys senior dry food, she says, nearly killed her two dogs.

In another development, Menu Foods said it is phasing out ingredients from China until it is assured they're safe. Chinese ingredients have been blamed for the wave of pet poisonings across the country.

I cannot even begin to describe the hell our pets have gone through, Cynthia H. of West Hills, California, says of her six-year-old Pomeranian, Killer, and her nine-year-old American Eskimo-Sheltie mix, Juliet. This has been weeks of vomiting and diarrhea and illness -- skin infections, bladder infections, not eating, lethargy -- basically, they were poisoned by this bad food.

Cynthia says shed just started feeding her dogs Nutro Maxs Senior Dry food around the first of this month, and chose that brand because it wasnt included in the nationwide recall of more than 60 million containers of pet foods.

Thats the irony of the whole thing. This food was something new that I started feeding them because of the pet food recall. I was being very careful not to give things on that recall list.

Since March, 18 companies have recalled more than 5,600 pet food products. That action came after the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) confirmed two ingredients used to make the products -- wheat gluten and rice protein concentrate -- were tainted with melamine and melamine-related compounds.

Melamine is a chemical used to make plastic and fertilizers. It is not approved for use in pet or human food.

The FDA also discovered the Chinese companies that exported those ingredients to the United States intentionally spiked the products with melamine to increase the protein content.

Thousands of dogs and cats that have eaten the contaminated pet food have suffered kidney problems or died.

In Cynthias case, her dogs became sick shortly after they started eating Nutro Maxs dry food. And their symptoms mirror those in pets that have eaten the tainted -- and recalled -- foods.

Juliet got sick first, Cynthia says, adding she bought the Nutro Max dry food in April, but didnt start feeding it to her dogs until May. And she has been very ill for nearly three weeks. Shes had bloody diarrhea, repeated vomiting, and her system also started shutting down, resulting in a bad bladder infection. She has also been on two different types of medications.

Cynthias Pomeranian experienced similar problems.

He has vomited and had severe diarrhea for more than a week. His system started to shut down, and he ended up with a serious skin infection. Hes still on antibiotics and is not yet well.

Both dogs, she says, were also extremely lethargic.

I was down at the vets office with both of them and I didnt think theyd come back. Theyve been through hell.

Is it possible that anything besides of the food made the dogs sick?

No way, Cynthia says.

My dogs have been incredibly healthy dogs. Theyre indoors dogs and only go outside with me supervising them. Theres nothing else they could have gotten into; theres nothing else that could have done this to them.

She adds: I just know it happened because of the food.

Her vet agrees. She concurred with me that I should stop feeding them Nutro Max.

Contacted FDA

To protect other dogs from getting sick, Cynthia contacted the FDA and Nutro Products with her concerns about the dry food.

I filed a compliant with the FDA, but theyre being very unresponsive. I called the Los Angeles office in Orange County and got a call back from someone in Arizona. Apparently, Los Angeles got a lot of bad pet food and there are a massive amount of people calling the FDA office in Orange County.

Orange Countys FDA office wanted samples of the food and they were going to send someone over to my house to pick it up, she adds. But they havent called me in three weeks. I thought there should be some urgency because this stuff is still on the shelves.

Deaf Ears

How did Nutro Products respond?

My concerns fell on deaf ears, Cynthia says. I did speak to someone in their corporate office and they kept saying that they feel their dry food is safe. They are also refusing to do anything for anyone. And Im out $500 in vet bills.

Cynthia isnt the only pet owner who has contacted ConsumerAffairs.com with concerns about Nutros dry food.

Consider some of the similar complaints weve received in the past few months:

• Kevin S. of Roseville, California, wrote: I have to put down my dog of six years today as she has the same symptoms as the other animals that have eaten contaminated foods. I realize that there has been no official recall of dry dog food, but my dog has only eaten two products in her life, Nutro Max dry dog food and Purina Beggin Strips. Please stop this nightmare and help keep other animals safe for this tragic event. I have spent over two thousand dollars attempting to save my dog. Today is her last day as she is being put to sleep this afternoon.

• Bonita L. Wachs of Germantown, Wisconsin, told us: My three-year-old Shih Tzu became very ill in the fall of 2006. She was extremely thirsty, drank excessively, lost her appetite, lost weight, had diarrhea and vomiting, was lethargic, and was very ill. She refused to eat her food, but, as many owners did, we forced her to eat the food she didn't want. She developed a high level of glucose in her urine and a urinary tract infection.

"The vet was stumped with her condition. I had asked if it could be her dry dog food -- Nutro Max. The vet said that was a good brand and did not think so. In the spring, when the pet food scare was in full force, I called the service line and reported my dogs illness to the company. They said they had not had any problems with the dry food or Nutro treats, but would document my complaint. I switched to Purina dog food back in January, and now my dog is clear of glucose in her urine. The vet is still stumped, but happy she is well. Molly had a rough few months, and we have a few hundred dollars in vet bills. We pray there is no physical damage to her kidneys.

• Angelique of Fort Lauderdale, Florida, told us: My dog (only four-years-old) died within 4 days of me buying a new bag of Nutro Max dry dog food. This is not on the list of recalled foods, but this was the only major change in his diet and he was never out of my sight. He was fine on Sunday until 2 a.m. when he started having diarrhea,vomiting, lethargy, bloody diarrhea, and by the time I took him to the hospital at 1 p.m. the next day he was in shock. His system shut down and he died at around 4:30 p.m. This needs to be stopped. The company refuses to acknowledge there is a problem, but if you search on the Internet you will find many people saying the exact same thing happened to them. This food needs to be recalled now.

No Response

ConsumerAffairs.com tried to reach Nutro Products, but the company did not return our calls.

A press release on the companys Web site, however, states: Nutro wishes to reassure its customers that Nutro's dry dog and cat foods are safe to feed their petsand none of Nutro's dry pet foods are involved in the latest dry pet food recall announcements involving contaminated rice protein from China.

The press release also states: None of Nutro's dry dog or cat foods have been involved in any of the melamine related recallsand an independent testing laboratory has tested the rice protein used in Nutro's dry pet foods and no melamine was detected.

In the current environment, we want to communicate frequently with our customers about Nutro's products and reassure you that our dry dog and cat foods are safe.

Cynthia vehemently disagrees. And she plans to continue warning other pet owners about Nutros dry dog food.

This food was supposed to be safe and it isntit nearly killed our two dogs.

Menu Foods Makes a Change

In related pet food recall news, Menu Foods announced this week that it will no longer source vegetable proteins --like wheat gluten or rice protein concentrate -- from China until those ingredients are deemed safe.

Menu is phasing out all ingredients from China until such time as Menu and its customers are convinced of their safety, attorney David Lillehaug told ConsumerAffairs.com on Tuesday.

Menu isnt the only pet food manufacturer taking this stance against China.

Royal Canin USA announced last week that it will no longer source vegetable proteins from that country.

More about the Pet Food Recall ...



Pet Owners Blame Nutro Products for their Dog's Illnesses...

Menu Foods Says It's Ready to Process Claims from Pet Owners

Menu Foods has posted claims information on its Web site for pet owners whose pets were killed or injured by contaminated feed.

The Canadian-based company in March recalled more than 60 million containers of melamine-tainted pet food -- linked to the deaths and illnesses of thousands of dogs and cats nationwide -- and now says it will address any reasonable expense incurred by pet owners that we can identify as being caused by contamination of Menu Foods products.

The company also advised pet owners of the ramifications of settling directly with Menu Foods instead of joining one of the more than 50 class-action lawsuits filed in the United States and Canada.

Pet owners, for example, are told any mutually agreeable settlement of your claim would require you to sign a settlement agreement that would release any and all claims for damages that you may have arising out of the recall and/or related to the injury and/or death of your pet.

The company also indicated that it plans to oppose the class action lawsuits.

We expect Plaintiffs lawyers will make motions for class certification, and Menu Foods expects to oppose those motions, the company stated on its Web site. At this point, no court has ruled on the question of whether class certification is appropriate.

Menu Foods also stated that several other companies have recalled pet food products. And pet owners who file claims with their company need to sure they relate to pet food manufactured by Menu Foods.

The company, which estimates the recall will cost anywhere from $40 to $45 million, added: Subject to any court order, which would prevent Menu Foods from proceeding with the settlement contemplated herein, we will proceed with the settlement processwe sincerely hope that we are able to work together to bring this matter to a prompt conclusion.

Hurdles to Clear

Pet owners who choose this settlement route, however, have several hurdles to clear.

The company requires them to file the following documentation, which many pet owners may not have:

• Receipts from the purchase of the affected products;
• Copies of any labels from the products;
• Copies of any records from a veterinarian, clinic or other healthcare facility;

Pet owners are also asked to save all opened and unopened cans and pouches of the affected dog and cat foods.

In addition, pet owners must fill out a lengthy questionnaire that asks for such information as the UPC codes on the recalled foods, dates the products were manufactured, dates when their pets ate the food, number of cans or pouches their pets ate, and whether their pets had any pre-existing conditions.

An Arizona pet owner -- whose 13-year-old Sheltie suddenly died after eating one of the recalled foods -- told ConsumerAffairs.com today that shes torn about which avenue to take to resolve this matter.

It seems like Menu Foods wants to pull you away from going the class action route, says Jerri L. of Goodyear, Arizona. It seems like they want you to settle directly with them and their claims people.

Uneven Contest

What's a consumer to do? The options include:

• Hire an attorney and file a lawsuit;
• Hope that a class action succeeds;
• File an action in Small Claims Court; or
• Take whatever the pet food manufacturer feels like giving you.

The unfortunate truth is that the law regards pets as property, not as sentient beings -- and therefore, unlike relatives of humans killed or injured by another's actions, pet owners can't recover damages for their pet's pain and suffering.

Nor can one claim compensation for an animal's lost wages, as is the case when a family breadwinner dies or is disabled.

"What this means is that -- at best -- pet owners who spend time and money going to court might be able to recover their veterinarian bills and at least a portion of the deceased animals' fair market value, which is probably less than the original purchase price," said an attorney who is not involved in the case, is not accepting any cases involving contaminated feed and did not want to be identified.

"Class action claims may or may not succeed, the process will be lengthy and consumers will very likely get a minuscule settlement," the attorney said. "On the other hand, they don't have to spend any time or money in pursuing the claim."

"An alternative some pet owners might consider is to file a claim against the pet food manufacturer in Small Claims Court. They do not need an attorney and the likelihood is that the pet food maker won't appear to defend. Consumers who take this route should be sure to take receipts, vet bills and pictures of the pet to court with them."

The Small Claims option might be appropriate for animal owners who spent hundreds or thousands of dollars on medical care, the lawyer suggested.

One thing's certain, the attorney said: Consumers who sign a settlement form with Menu Foods are closing all of their options and are at the mercy of a giant corporation.

"They'll be lucky to get a free can of dog food," she predicted.

Emotional Toll

In Jerris case, shes had to endure the emotional turmoil of losing her beloved dog, Sandy Boy.

And then theres the financial loss.

Our vet bills are around $700, Jerri says. Sandy Boy was also a champion show dog and I paid $300 for him. That was years ago and was pretty expensive at that time.

Im just hoping to have some type of resolution so this doesnt drag on and on, she says, adding Sandy Boy was in perfect health before she fed him Nutra Max dog food.

Sandy Boy suddenly died last Memorial Day months before Menu Foods announced its massive recall. But Jerri says he had symptoms that mirror those in dogs and cats that became sick or died after eating the melamine-tainted pet food.

Melamine

Melamine is a chemical used to make plastic and fertilizers. It is not approved for use in human or pet foods.

The Food and Drug Administration confirmed two imported and mislabeled ingredients used to make the pet food -- wheat gluten and rice protein concentrate -- contained melamine and melamine-related compounds.

FDA officials say those ingredients were really wheat flour. And they were intentionally spiked with melamine to increase the protein content.

All the tainted ingredients came from two now-defunct companies in China: Xuzhou Anying Biologic Technology Development Co. and Futian Biology Technology Co. Ltd.

Thousands of dogs and cats that have eaten the tainted pet food have suffered kidney disease or died. The FDA says its received reports of 4,100 deaths of cats and dogs linked to the adulterated pet food.

The Pet Connection Web site has received unconfirmed reports of 4,867 pets -- 2,519 cats and 2,348 dogs -- that have died from the contaminated food. It also said the total number of pets affected by the tainted food is 14,646.

Jerris not surprised by the number of pets that have become sick or died after eating the tainted food. Or that the pet food contamination has spread to chickens, pigs, and fishand the human food supply.

The FDA, however, said the risk to humans who eat meat from farm animals or fish that consumed the tainted feed is minimal.

As I started reading more and more about the recall, I expected more things to come out, Jerri says. It just seems to be spreading everywhere.

Whats the solution to this crisis?

Jerri told ConsumerAffairs.com the first step is for the United States to cut all trade agreements with China.

I think most people would agree that we should stop doing business with China. Theyve taken away jobs from us for years and years.

She adds: We cant get prescription medicines from Canada, but were getting these things (food products) from China that arent even regulated.

More about the Pet Food Recall ...



Menu Foods Says It's Ready to Process Claims from Pet Owners...

Pet Food Safety Summit Set for July

By Lisa Wade McCormick
ConsumerAffairs.com

May 15, 2007
The company that imported melamine-tainted ingredients linked to the deaths of thousands of dogs and cats nationwide called today for a national Pet Food Ingredients Safety Summit.

ChemNutra, of Las Vegas, said it wants manufacturers, ingredient importers, and analysis laboratories to work together at the summit -- tentatively set for July 14, 2007 in Las Vegas -- on import standards and specifications for pet food ingredients from China and around the world.

Just as E. coli incidents have forced retailers and restaurateurs to get more directly involved with ensuring the safety of growers, the melamine adulteration of pet food mandates that importers and manufacturers establish new protocols for ensuring the safety of our suppliers, ChemNutras CEO, Steve Miller, said in a written statement.

I am hopeful that those who import and use imported pet food ingredients will set aside any competitive differences we may have to unite for what I know is a common purpose, the safety of pets."

Since March, 18 companies have recalled more than 5,600 pet food products because they contained imported and mislabeled ingredients tainted with melamine and melamine-related derivatives.

Melamine is a chemical used in plastics and fertilizers. It is not approved for use in pet or human food.

Importers originally thought those ingredients were wheat gluten and rice protein concentrate.

But the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has since learned those tainted ingredients were wheat flour intentionally spiked with melamine to give a higher protein count.

Two Chinese companies exported those tainted ingredients to the United States -- Xuzhou Anying Biologic Technology Development Co. and Futian Biology Technology Co. Ltd.

U.S. food inspectors sent to China to investigate the companies discovered last week that both manufacturers had closed and all their equipment was dismantled.

We visited the two facilities, but there's essentially nothing to be found in that they are currently closed down, not operating, Walter Batts, deputy director of the FDAs Office of International Programs, told reporters. There's essentially nothing, as they have determined, that is available to be seen at the facilities. They've been closed down, machinery dismantled, nothing to really get access to.

The FDA also confirmed that China detained the manager of one of those companies Mao Lijun of Xuzhou Anying.

The Los Angels Times reported that Mao Lijuns factory has sickened people and plants for years.

Farmers in this poor rural area about 400 miles northwest of Shanghai had complained to local government officials since 2004 that Mao's factory was spewing noxious fumes that made their eyes tear up and the poplar trees nearby shed their leaves prematurely, the paper reported.

Yet no one stopped Mao's company from churning out bags of food powders and belching smoke until one day last month when, in the middle of the night, bulldozers arrived and tore down the facility.

The story added, It wasn't authorities that finally acted: Mao himself razed the brick factory days before the investigators from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration arrived in China on a mission to track down the source of the tainted pet food ingredients.

And those tainted ingredients havent just shown up in pet food. Theyve made their way into feed for pigs, chicken, and fish.

FDA officials, however, say the risk to humans who eat meat from these farm animals and fish is minimal.

Congressional Concern

Meanwhile in Congress, Sen. Dick Durbin (D-IL) and Rep. Rosa DeLauro (D-CT) have asked the countrys trade representative to examine Americas trade relationship with China.

"There is significant evidence that China is failing to meet international food safety standards -- from deceptive labeling and intentional contamination of products to unsanitary conditions, DeLauro said in a written statement.

In a modern, globalized food supply system significant amounts of food imports are a reality. And the Chinese need to be aware that their regulations need to be strengthened because trade should not trump public health."

In a letter to Ambassador Susan Schwab, the United States Trade Representative, Durbin and DeLauro, wrote: The safety of food imports from China extends beyond the pet food recall. China is especially poor at meeting international food safety standards, which is particularly disturbing considering that China exported approximately $2.26 billion in agricultural products to the United States in 2006.

"A recent news article noted that, in February, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) blocked the entry of several food products from China because they contained banned additives, were tainted by pesticides or were contaminated with salmonella. Some products were simply unsanitary.

Durbin and DeLauro asked Ambassador Schwab to answer two specific questions:

• What sanitary measures are included in current free trade agreements and other permanent trade relations in which the United States is currently engaged?

• What legal recourse does the United States possess with respect to imported food products that pose a threat to public health, in the event that the country where the offending product originated is not cooperative?

"Not that long ago, the vast majority of products at the local grocery store were from domestic manufacturers, and subject to standard regulations, Sen. Durbin said. Today, an increasing amount of our food, food additives, and over-the-counter drugs are imported from other countries -- where the laws governing food and drug safety are often lax or entirely absent.

"Fewer than one in 50 food products from overseas are inspected. Those are poor odds for any bet, and not a risk American families should have to take."

Meanwhile, the massive pet food recall sparked increased traffic and interest in pet-related Web sites.

Nielsen//NetRatings, a Internet media and market research company, said Monday that Web traffic to pet-related sites grew 115 percent in March over the previous month--from 9.1 million visitors to 19.5 million.

The company said worried pet owners flocked to online sites to learn more about that products affected by the nationwide recall of dog and cat foods.

More about the Pet Food Recall ...



Pet Food Safety Summit Set for July...

Royal Canin Recalls 15 Pet Foods


Add another 15 varieties to the growing list of recalled pet foods.

Royal Canin USA has recalled eight Sensible Choice dog food products and seven Kasco dry dog and cat food products.

The company said it took that action late Friday after tests revealed traces of a melamine derivative in the Chinese rice protein concentrate the company received from its supplier, Cereal Byproducts of Illinois.

Cereal Byproducts on May 4 recalled the rice protein concentrate it received from Chinese supplier Binzhou Futian Biology Technology Co. Ltd. after the FDA discovered melamine and melamine derivatives in the product.

The company said it shipped the tainted rice protein to three unnamed customers in the Midwest between July 19, 2006 and March 14, 2007. Two of those companies recalled their contaminated products around April 19, 2007.

In a written statement on Royal Canins Web site, Olivier Amice, president and CEO, stated: We deeply regret the concern and anxiety this announcement today will cause our loyal customers and the entire pet community. While a very limited number of Sensible Choice and Kasco products in this recall tested positive for trace levels of a melamine derivative, Royal Canin USA is voluntarily withdrawing these products out of an abundance of caution and because we are fully committed to the welfare of our customers pets.

The company, which announced last month that it would no longer use any Chinese vegetable protein suppliers, said it had not received any confirmed cases of illnesses linked to the recalled products.

The products involved in this recall have date codes between July 28, 2006 to April 30, 2007 and were sold in pet stores nationwide.

Since March, 18 companies have recalled more than 5, 600 pet food products.

Thousands of dogs and cats that have eaten the melamine-tainted pet food have suffered kidney disease or died.

The FDA said it has received reports of 4,100 deaths of cats and dogs linked to the tainted food, which is contaminated with the melamine and melamine-related compounds. Melamine is a chemical used to make plastics and fertilizers. It is not approved for use in human or pet food.

The Pet Connection Web site has received unconfirmed reports of 4,867 pets -- 2,519 cats and 2,348 dogs -- that have died from the contaminated food. It also states the total number of reports it's received about pets affected by the tainted food is 14,646.

More about the Pet Food Recall ...

Royal Canin Recalls 15 Pet Foods...

Chinese Companies Blamed for Pet Poisonings Closed Down


The two Chinese companies that exported the tainted -- and mislabeled -- ingredients linked to the deaths of thousands of pets in the United States are now closed and all their equipment is dismantled.

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) sent food inspectors to China nearly two weeks ago to investigate the companies that made the melamine-tainted ingredients -- Xuzhou Anying Biologic Technology Development Co. and Futian Biology Technology Co. Ltd.

We visited the two facilities, but there's essentially nothing to be found in that they are currently closed down, not operating, Walter Batts, deputy director of the FDAs Office of International Programs, told reporters Thursday.

There's essentially nothing, as they have determined, that is available to be seen at the facilities. They've been closed down, machinery dismantled, nothing to really get access to.

All Ingredients Traced

The FDA traced all the tainted ingredients that triggered one of the largest pet food recalls in U.S. history to those two Chinese companies. Eighteen companies have recalled more than 5,500 pet food products since March.

The FDA on Thursday also reiterated that those Chinese companies mislabeled the melamine-tainted ingredients shipped to the United States. Those ingredients -- labeled as wheat gluten and rice protein -- are really wheat flour.

When our forensic chemistry center specifically looked into thatthey were able to measure the starch level of this product and determine that it wasn't in fact wheat gluten, but the wheat flour, said Dr. David Acheson, the FDAs new assistant commissioner for food protection.

He added: I can tell you that some of our testing has indicated that some of the melamine-positive material labeled as rice protein concentrate was not rice protein concentrate. It was indeed the ground up wheat flour with melamineso certainly some of the rice protein concentrate that we tested was mislabeled.

The FDA said the mislabeled melamine-tainted rice protein entered the U.S. in August of 2006; the mislabeled wheat gluten first came into the country in November 2006.

Those are the only two companies that we are aware of that sold this contaminated protein concentrate, said the FDAs Dr. Stephen Sundlof, director of the Center for Veterinary Medicine.

The FDA also confirmed that China has detained at least one official from these companies. U.S. food inspectors -- who are expected to return to the U.S. next week -- have not interviewed any officials with the Chinese manufacturers.

More Contaminated Fish Feed

In related news, the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife says additional hatcheries have received fish feed that is potentially tainted with melamine the same chemical found in the pet food linked to the deaths and illnesses of thousands of pets in the United States.

Melamine is used to make plastics and fertilizers. It is not approved for use in pet or human food in the United States.

Earlier this week, the FDA confirmed the presence of melamine in fish feed from the Canadian company, Skretting. FDA tests revealed one sample of fish feed at the Marion Forks Hatchery in Oregon contained that chemical.

The Skretting company recalled all the tainted fish feed -- made with contaminated rice protein from China -- earlier this week.

Recent testing by the USFDA has found a very low level of melamine in a batch of Bio-Oregon brand fish feed shipped to the United States, the company said in a written release. To date, Skretting has received no complaints related to unusual fish health issues.

Oregons Department of Fish and Wildlife said the following hatcheries received the tainted feed: Sandy, Willamette, Cole Rivers, Oak Springs, Oxbow, Salmon River, Butte Falls, Cascade, Wizard Falls, Marion Forks, Bonneville, Leaburg, South Santiam, Bandon, Elk River, Rock Creek, Fall River, Nehalem, Trask, McKenzie, Gnat Creek, Umatilla, Cedar Creek, Klamath, Looking Glass and Big Creek.

Based on our initial review it does not appear that any legal-sized rainbow trout from our hatcheries were fed any of the recalled product, said Steve Williams, Oregons deputy fish division administrator. However, we are working with the Oregon Department of Agriculture to test a sampling of fish that received the Skretting feed to determine if they contain melamine and in what levels.

Fish and Wildlife officials said the tainted product is a starter feed given to juvenile salmon and trout -- usually for a short time. These fish are eventually released and caught by anglers.

I want to emphasize that none of the fish appear to have any ill effects and there are no plans to destroy any of the fish, said Williams, adding his department is getting certification from all fish feed manufacturers to verify the products contain no melamine.

Minimal Risk to Humans

The FDA said the risk to humans who eat these fish is minimal.

Earlier this week, scientists from several federal agencies said the risk to humans who eat meat from the thousands of hogs and millions of chickens that consumed melamine-tainted feed is also minimal.

"We do not believe this poses any significant human-health threat," the FDAs Dr. Acheson said.

Regarding the specific health risks associated with these fish, Acheson added: Federal scientists from multiple agencies concluded that humans who may have eaten fish fed the melamine-containing feed face a very low health risk.

The FDA, however, will continue to sample fish that received the tainted feed.

Critics in Congress

Congresswoman Rosa L. DeLauro (D-Conn.) continues to criticize what she calls the countrys antiquated food safety system.

When the FDA announced last week that million of chickens in the U.S. may have consumed melamine-tainted feed, she said: The FDA initially tried to minimize the impact of the pet food recall and dismissed claims that the contaminated pet food could threaten the human food supply. And they were wrong.

"This discovery that as many as 20 million chickens on farms across the country may have been fed melamine contaminated feed highlights the egregious holes in our food safety system. Had this situation been approached with an open mind, these connections to animal feed could have been made sooner. We finally need to acknowledge that our antiquated food safety system has collapsed and is unable to protect the public health.

She added: This latest disclosure in the pet food recall demonstrates that our food safety system needs to be reformed. It is time to grant the FDA and other food safety agencies clear mandatory recall and inspection authority. These initial steps would help create a modern, comprehensive food safety agency that will be capable of protecting our food supply and restoring consumer confidence.

In other pet food recall news:

• All vegetable protein products -- like wheat gluten or rice protein concentrate -- imported from China cannot come into the United States unless they've been tested for melamine, cyanuric acid, or other melamine-derived compounds, the FDA said.

• The FDA is sampling pet food imported from China to see if those products contain melamine or melamine-related compounds. The agency said it will soon start sampling animal feed and fish feed imported from China;

• FDA officials are visiting manufacturers in the United States that use protein concentrates in human, pet, or animal foodsand testing samples of the companies products for melamine and melamine-related compounds. The agency said it will also sample some of the finished products;

• The FDA said there are no indications that melamine-tainted bulk products were shipped directly to firms that manufacture products for humans;

More about the Pet Food Recall ...



Chinese Companies Blamed for Pet Poisonings Closed Down...

Fish Were Fed Contaminated Feed; Recalls Expanded

First it was dogs and cats.

Then pigs.

Then chickens.

And now the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) confirms an undisclosed number of fish consumed feed tainted with the same chemical that triggered one of the largest pet food recalls in U.S. history.

The FDA, however, said the level of melamine contamination does not pose any health threat to humans who might eat the fish, according to various media reports. FDA officials also said they did not know if any of these fish have entered the human food supply.

The contaminated fish feed -- made with a wheat ingredient imported from China -- came from a Canadian company called Westaqua, officials said.

Health officials are now investigating other U.S. aquaculture farms that used the contaminated feed. Farmed fish are usually sold for direct consumption or to stock lakes and streams.

The FDA said it would test samples of the fish for melamine, a chemical used in plastics and pesticides. Melamine, however, is not approved for use in pet or human food.

The presence of melamine and melamine-related compounds in the imported wheat and rice ingredients used to make pet food triggered a massive recall of more than 60 million containers of dog and cat food.

Since March, 18 companies have recalled more than 5, 600 pet food products.

Thousands of dogs and cats that have eaten the tainted pet food have suffered kidney disease or died. The FDA said it has received reports of 4,100 deaths of cats and dogs linked to the tainted food. The Pet Connection Web site has received unconfirmed reports of 4,633 pets -- 2,499 cats and 2,301 dogs that have died from the contaminated food.

It also said the total number of pets affected by the tainted food is 14, 553.

Other Animals Affected

But dogs and cats arent the only animals affected by the contaminated food.

Federal officials have confirmed that some 20 million chickens and thousands of pigs also received feed tainted with melamine. And thousands of those animals have entered the human food supply.

The FDA, however, said the risk to humans who eat meat from these animals is minimal.

It Wasn't Gluten

In related news, the FDA revealed the two ingredients believed to be the source of the melamine-contamination were mislabeled when they entered the U.S. from China.

Those ingredients -- wheat gluten and rice protein concentrate are really wheat flour.

What we discovered is these are not wheat gluten and rice protein concentrate but in fact are wheat flour contaminated by melamine, David Acheson, the FDAs assistant commissioner for food protection, told reporters.

Acheson said the FDA is considering enforcement options.

Two companies -- Xuzhou Anying Biologic Technology Development Co. and Futian Biology Technology Co. Ltd. exported the ingredients from China.

The Chinese government recently disclosed that Xuzhou Anying did not declare the contaminated wheat ingredients as a raw material for feed or food. Instead, it listed them as a non-food product, which meant they were not subject to mandatory inspection by China.

Chinese authorities have since detained the general manager of Xuzhou Anying, Mao Lijun.

Other Developments

In related pet food recall news:

• A second company that received rice protein imported from China has recalled the product. The Cereal Byproducts company announced earlier this week that the FDA found melamine and melamine-related derivates in the rice protein imported from Chinese supplier, Binzhou Futian Biology Technology Co. Ltd.

In a written statement, Cereal Byproducts said it shipped the tainted ingredient to three customers in the Midwest between July 19, 2006 and March 14, 2007. The company, however, said only two companies recalled the contaminated products around April 19, 2007. The FDA said more pet foods could be recalled in the wake of this action by Cereal Byproducts. The company said it has not received any confirmed reports of pet deaths linked to the tainted ingredient.

We are confident that our customers have implemented on-going recalls and the remaining rice protein concentrate, not previously distributed to these customers, is located at a separate warehouse facility under quarantine, the company said in a written statement;

• Pet food manufacturer Royal Canin family has announced it will no longer use vegetable proteins --like wheat gluten, corn gluten, and rice protein concentrate -- from China. The company also said it will start screening for melamine and melamine-related derivatives during its standard testing protocols.

In addition, the company offered to cover the costs of medical screenings for pets that have eaten any of the affected Royal Canin USA products;

• South Africa's Pet Food Industry Association (PFI) has advised pet food makers not to buy Chinese ingredients for use in their products. At least 25 dogs in South Africa have recently died after eating pet food made with tainted corn gluten imported from China. Tests revealed the corn gluten was contaminated with melamine and cyanuric acid. South Africas PFI is also encouraging pet food companies to test their ingredients for melamine.

Other Concerns

Meanwhile, its not just vegetable proteins from China that concern U.S. health officials.

The Alabama Department of Agriculture and Industries recently banned imported catfish from China. That action came after tests on samples of catfish tested positive for an antibiotic prohibited for use in the United States.

The state tested 20 samples of catfish. Of those samples, 14 tested positive for the antibiotic fluoroquinolones, which the FDA banned from use in food-producing animals in 1997.

We are sending notice today that we are not going to continue to sit by and let these foreign countries produce their food at a different standard than we ask our farmers to produce by and then send those products in here at a cheaper price," Alabamas Agriculture Commissioner Ron Sparks told reporters.

The Agriculture Department also tested 13 samples of basa fish from Indonesia, Thailand, Vietnam and Malaysia. Five of those samples tested positive for antibiotics. Those five samples came from Thailand, Vietnam, and Malaysia.

The states food safety director told reporters the presence of antibiotics in these fish in not accidental. He said theyre used to kill bacteria in the water.

More about the Pet Food Recall ...



Fish Were Fed Contaminated Feed; Recalls Expanded...

Little Risk to Humans from Tainted Animal Feed, Feds Assert

Theres little risk to humans who eat meat from chickens or pigs that consumed feed made with melamine-tainted pet food scraps.

Thats the message scientists with five federal agencies issued today.

Even in a worst case scenario -- in which a person ate only foods for one day contaminated with melamine at the levels in the adulterated animal feed -- the potential exposure would be about 2,500 times lower than the dose considered potentially harmful, the scientists said.

In other words, it was well below any level of public health concern, according to a written statement released today by the federal agencies involved in the risk assessment.

Scientists with the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), and the Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS) of the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) conducted the study.

In related news today, the federal government recommended lifting the holds placed on millions of chickens and thousands of pigs after their feed tested negative for melamine and melamine-related compounds. That means these animals can be slaughtered and enter the food supply.

Thousands of other chickens and pigs that ate the tainted feed are expected to be held for another week -- until scientists can determine the overall risk of melamine to the animals health.

Scientists, however, say the risk to animals that ate the tainted food is minimal. Thats because melamine -- a chemical used to make plastic -- doesnt accumulate in these farm animals bodies.

Instead, its excreted in their urine.

When exposure levels are much higher, as was the case with cats and dogs, the melamine and its compounds appear to cause the formation of crystals in the kidney systems, resulting in kidney damage, the agencies said today.

There was no indication of kidney damage in hogs. Both hogs and chickens known to have been fed contaminated feed appear to be healthy.

The agencies added: This dilution factorhelps to support the conclusion that there is very low risk to human health from eating meat from animals that were fed the contaminated product. This conclusion supports the decision announced on April 28 not to recall meat from animals that were fed contaminated product.

The assessment done by the federal scientists is part of the ongoing investigation into wheat gluten and rice protein imported from China, which the FDA confirmed was tainted with melamine and three melamine-related compounds: cyanuric acid, ammelide, and ammeline.

The presence of these tainted ingredients triggered one of the largest pet food recalls in U.S. history. Since March, 18 companies have recalled more than 5,300 dog and cat food products.

SmartPak Canine Recall

The latest pet food company to pull its products off the shelves is SmartPak Canine. That company recalled all of its LiveSmart Adult Lamb and Brown Rice food last Wednesday after learning the product tested positive for melamine.

Thousands of dogs and cats that have eaten pet food tainted with melamine and melamine-related compounds have suffered kidney disease or died.

Last week, the FDA said it had received reports of 4,100 deaths of cats and dogs linked to the contaminated food.

The FDA also said more than 17,000 consumers had contacted the agency with complaints about the tainted pet food products. ConsumerAffairs.com has also received scores of complaints about dogs and cats becoming sick or dying from the tainted pet food.

A Cat's Death

One consumer who contacted us over the weekend is convinced her cat died from the tainted food.

And his death, she says, occurred a month before Menu Foods announced its massive recall in March of 60 million containers of wet dog and cat food.

I fed my cat, Boy, Iams and Pet Pride wet cat food, says Lee G. of Nevada City, California. Those cat food are now included in the recall. He was an 11-year-old, very healthy, male, Tabby cat.

In February, though, Boy suddenly became seriously ill.

He was lethargic, had no appetite, and was overly thirsty, she says. We took him to the vet and she smelled an ammonia type odor from his mouth. She said that indicated kidney failure.he was in acute kidney failure.

The vet hydrated him, had him on an I.V. and had to force feed him for nearly two weeks.

Lees cat, however, didnt respond to treatment.

Despite all their best efforts to save him, Boy was euthanized on February 6, 2007. That is before the recall but my vet is convinced Boy's death was due to tainted food.

He was my best little tiger buddy; I miss him terribly, she says. How horrible to think that I poisoned my own buddy. To feed your pet a food thats going to kill them this whole thing is heinous.

Imported Ingredients

Like many grieving pet owners, Lee wonders why the United States imports wheat gluten, rice protein, and other ingredients used in pet and human food from China.

I think it would be best to buy local, she says. We have great agriculture here (in California). I dont see why pet food companies are using foreign products. Thats ridiculous. I would pay more to buy something grown in the United States.

Lee says shell never trust another commercially made pet food product.

I cook my own cat food now. I dont buy that canned stuff any more This whole thing is all about money. And look what its doing to our pets.

More News

In related pet food recall news:

• SmartPak Canine said the discovery of melamine in its Adult Lamb and Brown Rice food was unexpectedsince the formula does not contain rice protein concentrate, wheat gluten, or any of the ingredients on FDAs import watch list. The company said all the ingredients in this formula -- with the exception of the lamb and lamb meal -- originate from U.S. sources. The lamb and lamb meal is from New Zealand.

According to the FDA, the pet food company has learned of two instances of vomiting and the death of a 10-year-old Rottweiler linked to this recalled food. We are all very upset to have exposed our customers and their dogs to this situation, SmartPak Canine wrote on its Web site. We and other responsible members of the pet community will be working hard over the next several months to learn from this situation and to re-earn your trust.

• Federal investigators believe theyve traced all sources of the melamine-tainted ingredients from China that are linked to the deaths of dogs and cats in this country. Thats what the countrys new food safety czar, Dr. David W.K. Acheson, told The Baltimore Sun. He also told the paper that Americans shouldnt worry about giving pet food to their dogs and cats. And the search for the pet food contaminant is "virtually closed" and investigators have a "very good handle" on its distribution;

• The U.S. continues to monitor imported wheat and corn gluten and rice protein concentrate -- from China and other countries -- earmarked for human and animal consumption. Federal officials say there is no evidence that products bound for the human food supply are contaminated;

• PetHobbyist.com will hold a panel discussion of the pet recall crisis at 10 p.m. (EST) tomorrow, May 8. Interested pet owners can join the discussion, which will included panelist from PetConnection.com; PetSitUSA.com and PetFoodTracker;

More about the Pet Food Recall ...



Little Risk to Humans from Tainted Animal Feed, Feds Assert...

Senate Approves Measure to Strengthen Food Safety

By Lisa Wade McCormick
ConsumerAffairs.com

May 5, 2007
The Senate has approved an amendment introduced by U.S. Senator Dick Durbin (D-IL) to strengthen the countrys food safety system.

By a 94-0 vote, the Senate approved the measure that establishes an early warning and notification system for human and pet food, establish fines for companies that don't promptly report contaminated products, improves inspections and monitoring of imports, and provides more uniform pet food safety standards.

But one key piece from the original legislation is missing from the amendment--a proposal that would have given the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) power to issue recalls of contaminated or dangerous foods.

The FDA does not have that authority and must rely on the industry to voluntarily pull products. Durbins office told reporters the senator would address that provision later.

"With the passage of this amendment, we will make our nation's food safety system stronger on several fronts, Durbin said in a written statement. There is more work to be done to fix our food safety system, but today we have moved forward to address the growing concerns across our nation."

The FDA -- one of the federal agencies charged safeguarding the countrys food supply -- has come under fire in the wake of nationwide recalls of tainted pet food, spinach, and peanut butter.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) estimate some 76 million people suffer from food poisoning each year, according to Durbins office. Of that number, approximately 325,000 will be hospitalized and more than 5,000 will die.

Under the new amendment, the FDA has authority to:

Establish an early warning and notification system for human food and pet food products. The legislation directs the FDA to work with professional organizations, veterinarians, and others to release information about pet food contamination. In cases of both pet and human food contamination, the FDA will keep up-to-date recall lists on its Web site;

Create an adulterated food registry for imported and domestically produced foods. This would improve the FDA's ability to detect problems and alert consumers of contaminants. The amendment requires the FDA to establish a registry to collect information about potentially dangerous food adulteration. Importers, domestic processors, and food manufacturers must submit information about actual or suspected food adulterations. This information would be included in the FDAs database. Durbins office said the sources of the recent human and pet food contamination were wheat gluten and rice protein concentrate imported from China. Neither shipment was inspected by the FDA; in fact, the FDA inspects less than 1.5% of imports. A database would give the FDA better information to base inspections;

Require companies to maintain records and make them accessible to the FDA. This would prevent delays that could keep the contamination from being traced as quickly as possible. When peanut butter was recalled last winter, an FDA report showed that inspectors were denied documents when they requested them;

Establish uniform federal standards and better labeling of pet food. Today, the standards for the pet food industry are done on a voluntary basis by manufacturers and state departments of agriculture. There is no requirement for states to adopt these practices and they don't have the force of federal guidelines. Inspections are not coordinated state-to-state and some states have standards that are different than others.

Crisis Isn't Over

Meanwhile, an animal rights group has warned dog and cat owners that the pet food crisis is far from over. And pet owners need to continue watching their animals for symptoms of kidney failure.

The warning from The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (ASPCA) came on the heels of Menu Foods expanded recall of more than 200 varieties of dog and cat food.

Menu Foods took that action on Wednesday after learning those products were made at the same time its plants produced foods that contained adulterated wheat gluten imported from China.

The foods involved in this latest recall, however, do not contain any of the wheat gluten tainted with the chemical melamine.

The company said it took this action to prevent any cross-contamination.

Menu Foods has received a report from a customer and has received study results, both of which indicate cross-contamination, the company said in a written statement.

That announcement prompted ASPCA to issue its warning to pet owners.

Given the fact that there is new evidence of cross-contamination in ingredients that may have been considered safe prior to this news, we need to be much more aware of where the ingredients in our pets food are coming from, said Dr. Steven Hansen, a board-certified toxicologist and senior vice president with the ASPCA. He manages ASPCAs Animal Poison Control Center (APCC) in Urbana, Ill.

Hansen added: We are strongly recommending that pet parents immediately investigate, via their pet food manufacturers Web site or by calling them directly, where the ingredients--specifically protein supplements--are sourced from.

ASPCA recommends pet owners only feed their dogs or cats products that contain U.S.-made protein supplements.

The continued expansion of the recall is extremely worrying, said Dr. Louise Murray, director of medicine at the ASPCAs Bergh Memorial Animal Hospital (BMAH) in New York City. The magnitude of this crisis leaves us frustrated as to how to best protect pets and prevent any more illnesses or deaths.

The FDA said this week that its received reports of 1,950 cats and 2,220 dogs dying from the tainted pet food.

The FDA also said its received more than 17,000 consumer complaints about dogs and cats becoming sick or dying after eating contaminated pet food.

Eighteen companies have recalled more than 5,300 pet food products since March, making this one of the largest pet food recalls in U.S. history. The companies recalled those products after learning they contained wheat gluten or rice protein tainted with two chemicals: melamine and cyanuric acid.

New Theory

A new theory surfaced this week that might explain why pets are getting sick and dying from the tainted foods.

Tests conducted at the University of Guelphs Animal Health Laboratory in Ontario revealed melamine and cyanuric acid can react to form crystals that block kidney function.

"This is a piece of the puzzle, a significant finding," John Melichercik, director of analytical services for Guelph's laboratory services, told The Toronto Star. "We have found these crystals in cats that have suffered renal failure."

Analysis of those crystals revealed their chemical make-up is approximately 70 percent cyanuric acid and 30 percent melamine. The crystals are also insolubleor cant be dissolved in liquid.

Researchers were also able to replicate these crystals when they mixed melamine and cyanuric acid in samples of cat urine.

ASPCA says this new study offers some hope to veterinarians who are trying to save pets that have eaten the contaminated food.

The fact that we have started to learn how the presence of melamine may be impacting these animals gives us a small glimmer of hope that at least we know we are on the right track when it comes to treating the animals affected, Dr. Hansen said. These findings really start putting everything else we have seen into perspective.

Now that we see that crystals are formed when melamine and cyanuric acid are combined in cat urine, it may be that the cause of renal failure is somehow related to the obstruction caused by these crystals.

The study, he said, also explains why animals whose symptoms were detected early -- and rushed to their veterinarians and put on aggressive fluid therapy -- survived. This treatment may prevent additional crystals from forming and help flush out the existing crystals from the animals urinary tracts, he said. That would relieve the obstruction and reverse the effects of renal failure.

Some pet owners who contacted ConsumerAffairs.com, however, say their animals died before they could get them in for treatment.

Thats what happened to Helen K. of Los Lunas, New Mexico.

She didnt know OlRoy had recalled some of its treats and accidentally gave them to her seven-year-old Golden Retriever and her three-year-old Pit Bull.

The next day, the young Pit Bull had twitches, but on April 27, 200, my baby Sammie (the Golden Retriever) had massive seizures and passed away -- after much agony -- after 50 minutes, she told us. She had been drinking excessive amounts of watermy vet said to bring her in for more blood work. We didn't make it.

Helen says the loss is devastating to her family.

The guilt and enormous sadness has been felt by all. My 91-year-old father with dementia cannot put this out of his mind -- nor can I or our other dog or cat. It is like losing a child (almost).

The United States, she says, should stop importing products from countries like China that have poor food safety standards.

The ramifications to our pets -- and potentially to humans -- are too dangerous, she says.

It seems that if another country wants to undermine us, they will through our pets as this country has high esteem for all, Helen says. I feel that we should never import any food products from a country that has no regard for the health and well-being of all of God's creatures. It will not be long before we will not be able to eat our own meats because of contaminated feed.

More about the Pet Food Recall ...



Senate Approves Measure to Strengthen Food Safety...

Article Image

Menu Foods Expands Recall, Questions about Other Brands

Menu Foods of Canada has expanded its recall to include more than 200 new varieties of canned dog and cat food.

The action comes on the heels of its April recall of wet pet foods made with melamine-tainted wheat gluten--imported from China--and supplied by ChemNutra, Inc.

The products involved in this latest recall do not include that tainted wheat gluten, the company said. These products were manufactured during the same time that ChemNutras wheat gluten was used at any Menu Foods plant.

The company said it took this action to prevent any cross-contamination.

Menu Foods has received a report from a customer and has received study results, both of which indicate cross-contamination, the company said in a written statement.

The latest recall involves 99 varieties of cat food sold under 42 brand names, including Sophistacat, Presidents Choice, Natural Ultramix, and Best Choice. The dog foods involved in this recall include 121 varieties sold under 25 brands, including Stater Brothers, Schnucks, Nu Pet, and Hill Country Fare.

Menu Foods also added two varieties of pet food--for its European market--to its recall list.

The company estimates its out-of-pocket expenses for the total recall will be $45 million.

In March, Menu Foods announced a massive recall of 60 million containers of wet dog and cat food sold throughout North America. The company recalled those products after learning pets that ate the food suffered kidney problems or died.

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has since confirmed the presence of two chemicals in the imported wheat gluten and rice protein used to make these and other pet foods now under recall.

Those chemicals are melamine and cyanuric acid. Melamine is a chemical used in plastics and fertilizers; cyanuric acid is used to chlorinate pools. Neither is approved for use in pet foods.

The presences of these chemicals triggered one of the largest pet food recalls in history18 companies have recalled more than 5,300 pet food products in the past six weeks.

The FDA says its received reports that 1,950 cats and 2,220 dogs have died after eating the tainted pet food. The FDA also says its received more than 17,000 consumer complaints about dogs and cats becoming sick or dying after eating contaminated pet food.

Grieving Pet Owners

ConsumerAffairs.com has also received scores of complaints about pets becoming sick or dying from the tainted food. The complaints are from worried and grieving pet owners across the country.

Theyre pet owners like Christine P. of Colonia, New Jersey.

My dog died in two weeks from massive body shut down, liver and heart failure, she wrote us. I was feeding her Alpo Prime Cuts in Gravy that was on the recall list from Purina. She was an older dog, but healthy, and was just at the vet a couple months ago for her shots and nothing major was wrong.

Christine says she immediately stopped feeding her dog the Alpo Prime Cuts when she heard about the recall.

By that time, however, her dog was too far gone.

She refused to eat anything . . . she could not walk, was fainting, coughing, throwing up, and having loose bowels. I immediately brought her to the vet and had chest x-rays, and urine and blood sample done.

Her veterinarian recommended she immediately see a specialist. But before I could get her an appointment she died in my arms--gasping for air.

Emotionally I am a wreck. I had her for so long. She was my buddy and I cant get over it. . . I am in tears and mentally at a loss. No money can ever bring back my best friend.

Christine says tighter regulations are needed to protect the safety of human and pet food.

This should not be allowed to happen.

Nutro Max

Angelique H. of Fort Lauderdale, Florida, agrees.

Her dog--a Chow-mix she rescued off the streets--died after eating a brand of food that isnt on the recall list: Nutro Max dry dog food.

Makito

Makito was only four-years-old and died Monday, April 30, within four days of me buying a new bag of Nutro Max dry dog food, Angelique told us today. This (new bag) was the only major change in his diet and he was never out of my sight. He was fine on Sunday until 2 a.m. when he started vomiting, became lethargic, and had bloody diarrhea. By the time I took him to the hospital the next day he was in shock. His system shut down and he died around 4:30 p.m.

This needs to be stopped, she adds. The company refuses to acknowledge there is a problem, but if you search the Internet you will find many, many people saying the same thing happened to them. This food needs to be recalled now. No one should have to go through what I went through.

ConsumerAffairs.com has received a handful of similar complaints about pets becoming ill after eating Nutro Max dry food.

We left a message for the company this morning, but no one with Nutro had returned our call by late afternoon.

The companys Web site, however, states: No Nutro dry foods, biscuits, or treats are affected (in the recall).

Angelique is furious the company hasnt recalled its dry dog foodor listened to its customers.

What appalls me is that Menu Foods and Nutro have had, Im sure, many complaints like mine and theyre not doing anything. Its all a matter of dollars.

She adds: You trust that their food is going to be alright and then you find out that its not. This has been very tragic for me.

Pet owner Sondra K. understands that griefand frustration.

Her cat became sick after eating another brand of pet food thats not on the recall list.

My cat has been eating IAMS Dry Original cat food and has become ill with kidney problems, the Dallas, Texas, pet owner says. IAMS said they are not responsible (because) that dry food has not been recalled.

Sondra switched to another brandRoyal Canin. But a short time later, the company recalled that food, too.

The cat has been extremely ill and is starting to show symptoms again. He has to be checked every two weeks.

Sondra blames the pet food manufacturers and China for her cats illnessand the emotional and financial toll its had on her family.

The cat almost died and suffered tremendously after this gross act of negligence by the pet food manufacturers and the country of China.

In related news, Chinese authorities detained the general manager of one of the companies accused of selling contaminated wheat gluten to pet food suppliers in the United States, according to The New York Times.

A Chinese police spokesman told The Times that Mao Lijun, head of the Xuzhou Anying Biologic Technology Development Company, is being held in coastal Jiangsu Province, about 320 miles northwest of Shanghai.

The FDA has identified Xuzhou Anying and another Chinese company in nearby Shandong Province as the only sources of the contaminated ingredients that led to the massive pet food recall.

The Chinese government, however, said Xuzhou Anying purchased its wheat gluten from 25 different manufacturers--and the company may just be a supplier. Xuzhou Anying has said it did not manufacture the tainted wheat gluten shipped to the United States. The company said it received the tainted ingredient from other, unnamed sources.

The Chinese government also said Xuzhou Anying did not declare the contaminated wheat gluten it shipped to the United States as a raw material for feed or food. Instead, it listed the ingredient as a non-food product, which meant it was not subject to mandatory inspection by China.

Mr. Maos arrest may be a sign that China is stepping up its own investigation into the pet food scandal and show its willingness to cooperate with FDA officials, who arrived in that country on Monday.

U.S. food inspectors are in China to examine the plants that manufactured the melamine-tainted wheat gluten and rice protein concentrate.

The Chinese government had initially denied allegations that its exports could have caused the deaths in so many pets. The government now says its unlikely that melamine could cause such harm to these dogs and cats. China also banned the use of melamine in the vegetable proteins it exports or those used in domestic food.

More about the Pet Food Recall ...



Menu Foods Expands Recall, Questions about Other Brands...

New Theory on Dog and Cat Poisonings

Theres a new theory that might explain why thousands of dogs and cats that have eaten pet food -- made with contaminated ingredients imported from China -- have become sick or died.

Tests conducted at the University of Guelphs Animal Health Laboratory in Ontario revealed that two chemicals found in the tainted pet foods -- melamine and cyanuric acid -- can react to form crystals that block kidney function.

"This is a piece of the puzzle, a significant finding," John Melichercik, director of analytical services for Guelph's laboratory services, told The Toronto Star. "We have found these crystals in cats that have suffered renal failure."

Analysis of those crystals revealed their chemical make-up is approximately 70 percent cyanuric acid and 30 percent melamine. The crystals are also insoluble or cant be dissolved in liquid.

Researchers were also able to replicate these crystals when they mixed melamine and cyanuric acid in samples of cat urine.

This is still just a theory, but its a pretty compelling one, Tom McPheron, spokesman for the American Veterinary Medical Association (AMVA), told ConsumerAffairs.com. His organization participated in discussions with scientists about these findings. These crystals are very unique. Theyre something that scientist havent seen before, except perhaps once in a cat from Asia.

Theyre now talking about trying to replicate the crystals in the urine of dogs. The original tests were done on the urine of cats.

McPherson said scientists suspect two other melamine-related substances -- ammelide and ammeline -- may also play a role in the animals illnesses. Those chemicals are now under investigation.

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has confirmed the presence of melamine and cyanuric acid in the imported wheat gluten and rice protein used to make the contaminated pet foods.

Melamine is a chemical used to make plastic. Cyanuric acid is used to chlorinate pools.

Neither is approved for use in pet foods.

The presences of these chemicals triggered one of the largest pet food recalls in history 18 companies have recalled more than 5,300 pet food products in the past six weeks.

Case Solved?

Does this latest study finally solve the mystery surrounding the deaths and illnesses of pets who eaten the tainted food?

Not at all, says Daniel Rice, director of the New York State Food Laboratory.

I dont think weve found the solution, Rice told ConsumerAffairs.com today. No one has shown a cause and effect. Weve found some things in the urine; weve found some things in the feed. Right now, its just a hypothesis.

I think people are fairly open-minded about the possibility that there might be something else at play.

In March, Rices New York Laboratory and Cornell Universitys College of Veterinary Medicine identified another toxin in samples of the recalled pet food: aminopterin.

At the time, scientists thought this toxin might be the culprit behind the kidney failure and deaths in pets that ate the recalled foods.

Aminopterin is used as rat poison in some countries and as a cancer drug in the United States.

The FDA and other laboratories, however, downplayed that finding and focused their attention on melamine.

We still stand by our results, Rice says of the discovery of aminopterin in the recalled food. And were still testing for that and other toxins. Its possible that what we found was relatively rare...one early piece of the puzzle.

He adds: We found aminopterin in two pet food samples, but we havent found it in any other samples.

Focusing the investigation on melamine makes scientific sense, Rice says.

Its the one common feature. It appears that melamine and other-related compounds have been there (in the recalled products) and thats why scientists are focusing on that angle. Cyanuric acid has been found in the food; melamine has been found in the food.

Rice predicts scientists will continue to find melamine in other foods.

Im sure there will be other instances of finding melamine where it shouldnt be. Weve definitely identified a problem.

Will scientists ever solve this current pet food mystery, though?

I hope that well get an answer, Rice says. But I dont see anything on the imminent horizon.

There are a lot of excellent people all over the country who are working on the problem and theyre very interested and passionate about figuring it out. People arent going to just let this drop at least not in the scientific community. Were not considering it a dead issue.

3 Million Chickens

In related news, the FDA estimates that three million chickens and 500 hogs consumed feed made from tainted pet food scraps.

And a small percentage of those animals entered the human food chain.

The FDA, however, said the risk of illness to humans from eating these animals is minimal.

Why?

Federal authorities say the percentage of melamine in the feed is extremely low and only a small percentage of tainted pet food was used in poultry and hog feed.

To protect humans from these increasing problems with contaminated food, U.S. Senator Dick Durbin (D-IL) and Representative Rosa DeLauro (D-CT) introduced legislation on Tuesday to revise and upgrade the nation's food safety system.

The FDA -- one of the federal agencies charged with safeguarding the U.S. food supply -- has come under fire in the wake of nationwide recalls and quarantines of tainted pork, spinach, peanut butter, and pet food.

"The product recalls that we have seen in the past few weeks - first with pet food and then with food intended for human consumption - have shown us that food-borne illness is a dangerous and real threat in this country," Durbin said in a statement issued by his office.

"There are gaps in the inspection, monitoring, notification and enforcement elements of our food system and we must act now to address them. We simply cannot afford to let consumers continue to be the guinea pigs in our food safety system."

Food Safety Agencies Asleep

Representative DeLauro added: "After the countless recalls, alerts, and advisories from the past year, along with the latest Centers for Disease Control (CDC) numbers showing increases in various food-borne illnesses, the evidence is clear our food safety system is collapsing and one of the main agencies charged with protecting it, is asleep.

"This needs to change immediately - it is time to transform the FDA from the toothless agency it has become to one that takes the proactive steps necessary to protect our food supply and the public health."

The CDC estimates as many as 76 million people suffer from food poisoning each year, Durbin and DeLauro said. Of that number, approximately 325,000 will be hospitalized and more than 5,000 will die.

Under Durbin and DeLauros proposed legislation, the FDA would have authority to:

Issue mandatory recalls of contaminated or dangerous food. The FDA currently does not have this power. It must rely on the industry to voluntarily pull products from store shelves;

Establish an early warning and notification system for human food and pet food products. The legislation directs the FDA to work with professional organizations, veterinarians, and others to share information about pet food contamination. In cases of both pet and human food contamination, the FDA would be required to keep up-to-date recall lists on its Web site;

Establish uniform federal standards and better labeling of pet food. The practices that govern the pet food industry today are implemented on a voluntary basis by manufacturers and state departments of agriculture. There is no requirement for states to adopt these practices and they don't have the force of federal guidelines. Inspections are not coordinated state-to-state and some states have different standards than others;

Improve the FDA's ability to regulate imported food products. The sources of the recent human and pet food contamination were wheat gluten and rice protein concentrate from China. Neither shipment was inspected by FDA; in fact, the FDA inspects less than 1.5% of imports. The FDA does not currently certify that trading partners have food safety standards equivalent to those of the United States. Under the bill, foreign food safety systems and plants would be inspected by the FDA prior to certification and the United States could revoke certifications and deny importation of food that presented a public health risk;

• Require companies to maintain records and make them accessible to the FDA. This would prevent delays that could keep contaminations from being traced as quickly as possible. In the recent peanut butter recall, an FDA report showed that inspectors were denied documents when they requested them.

More about the Pet Food Recall ...



New Theory on Dog and Cat Poisonings...

Melamine Shows Up In Chicken Feed

Add chickens to the growing list of animals who have eaten feed contaminated with melamine -- one of the two chemicals at the center of the massive pet food recall and linked to the deaths and illnesses of scores of dogs and cats across the country.

The Food and Drug Administration and the U.S. Department of Agriculture confirmed chickens on 38 poultry farms in Indiana received feed made with melamine-tainted pet food scraps.

The federal agencies said these unidentified poultry farms received the contaminated feed in early February and gave it to the chickens within days after delivery.

Thirty of those chickens which came from a broiler farm have since been "processed" -- butchered and sold as food, in other words. The remaining eight chickens from a breeder poultry farm are under what the FDA calls a voluntary hold by the owner.

The agencies have not issued a recall of these chickens and say the likelihood of illness from eating them is low.

Just last week, federal authorities quarantined 6,000 hogs in eight states that were given melamine-tainted feed. The Associated Press reported meat from 345 hogs that ate tainted feed apparently entered the market.

This latest discovery about the chickens surfaced during a federal investigation of imported rice protein and wheat gluten, which the FDA has confirmed is tainted with melamine and a second chemical called cyanuric acid.

The FDA says cyanuric acid is used as stabilizer in outdoor swimming pools and hot tubs. Melamine is used in plastics and fertilizer.

"The combination of melamine and cyanuric acid is of concern to human and animal health," said Captain David Elder, director of the FDA's Office of Enforcement Office of Regulatory Affairs. "Melamine, at detected levels, is not a human health concern.

The presence of these tainted ingredients has triggered one of the largest pet food recalls in history. In the past six weeks, 18 companies have recalled more than 5,300 pet food products because they were made with melamine-tainted ingredients imported from China.

Expanded Alert

In related news, the FDA has issued an expanded import alert that allows inspectors to detain vegetable protein products imported from China and believed to be tainted with melamine.

Under this new action, inspectors can detain several products, including wheat gluten, rice gluten, rice protein, corn gluten, soy protein, and Mung Bean.

In recent weeks, there has been an outbreak of cat and dog deaths and illness associated with pet food manufactured with vegetable proteins contaminated with melamine and melamine related compounds, the FDA wrote in its alert. In response to this outbreak, FDA has been conducting an aggressive and intensive investigation ... This has been one of the largest pet food recalls food recalls in history, a recall that continues to expand.

New Figures

Buried in the text of this alert, the FDA also released -- for the first time -- figures associated with this massive recall.

And those figures confirm the crisis is more widespread than the FDA earlier reported.

Consider:

• The FDA says its received more than 17,000 consumer complaints about dogs and cats becoming sick or dying after eating contaminated pet food;

• Its received reports of approximately 1,950 cat deaths and approximately 2,200 dog deaths linked to contaminated pet food;

• Its tested approximately 750 samples of imported wheat gluten and products made with this ingredient. Of those samples, 330 tested positive for melamine and/or melamine-related compounds;

• Its tested approximately 85 samples of rice protein concentrate and products made with that ingredient. Of those samples, 27 tested positive for melamine and/or melamine-related compounds.

The FDA says its still trying to determine how melamine and melamine-related compounds contributed to the pet deaths and illnesses and determine the underlying cause of the contamination.

New Questions

The alert also disclosed information about the FDAs investigation into the pet food recall, which appears to raise as many questions as it answers:

• The melamine-tainted vegetable proteins came from two Chinese firms -- Xuzhou Anying Biologic Technology Development Co. Ltd. and Binzhou Futian Biology Technology Co. Ltd. There is strong evidence, however, that these firms are not the actual manufacturers (of these ingredients), the FDA says in its report. Moreover, despite many weeks of investigation, it is still unknown who the actual manufacturer or manufacturers of the contaminated products imported from China are.

• All the contaminated wheat gluten has been traced to Xuzhou Anying. The Chinese government, however, says that company purchased its wheat gluten from 25 different manufacturers -- and Xuzhou Anying may just be a supplier. Xuzhou Anying has said it did not manufacturer the tainted wheat gluten shipped to the United States. The company says it received the tainted ingredient from other, unnamed sources;

• The Chinese government said Xuzhou Anying did not declare the contaminated wheat gluten it shipped to the United States as a raw material for feed or food. Instead, it listed the ingredient as a non-food product, which meant it was not subject to mandatory inspection by China;

• FDA officials dont know how widespread the problem of tainted vegetable proteins is in China. The FDA said it does not know which regions of the country may or may not be impacted by the problem, which firms are the major manufacturers and exporters of vegetable proteins to the United States, where these vegetable proteins are grown in China, and what controls are currently in place to prevent against contamination.

The FDA says it has not found melamine in food imported from China for human consumption, but it is now sampling those products as a precaution.

FDA Creates New Position

To respond to increasing problems with U.S. food safety, the FDA today announced the creation of a new position -- Assistant Commissioner for Food Protection.

The FDA appointed Dr. David Acheson to the post.

Acheson is the chief medical officer and director of the Office of Food Defense, Communication and Emergency Response at the FDAs Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition.

In his new role, Acheson will work with FDA product centers and the Office of Regulatory Affairs to coordinate the agencys food safety and defense assignments.

He will also serve as the liaison to the Department of Health and Human Services and other U.S. departments and agencies on food safety and food defense related initiatives.

We've seen a rapid transformation of the food safety system due to advances in production technology, rapid methods of distribution, and the globalization of food sources, said FDA Commissioner, Dr. Andrew von Eschenbach.

Dr. Acheson's wealth of experience, and knowledge of the science behind food protection, will help the agency keep pace with this transformation in order to ensure that the safety and nutritional value of our food supply is second to none."

More about the Pet Food Recall ...



Melamine Shows Up In Chicken Feed...

Article Image

Spiked Pet Food Nothing New to Chinese,TimesFinds


Entrepreneurs in China have -- for years -- secretly added the chemical at the heart of the nationwide pet food recall into animal feed in that country.

Its been done to artificially inflate the protein levels in the feed. Thats the startling discovery made by reporters for The New York Times.

The Times reported that powdery scraps of melamine -- a chemical used to make plastics and fertilizers -- were secretly mixed into animal feed in China.

The melamine powder has been dubbed fake protein and is used to deceive those who raise animals into thinking they are buying feed that provides higher nutritional value, The Times reported.

The newspaper also said the practice is widespread in China, which has little regulatory supervision.

Now the question is: Did the Chinese companies that supplied the wheat gluten and rice protein used in pet foods in America follow this same practice?

Did those companies intentionally spike these ingredients with melamine to dupe U.S. importers that the products had higher protein contents?

U.S. food inspectors heading to China this week will try to answer those questions when they examine the facilities that manufactured these tainted ingredients, which are linked to the illnesses and deaths of scores of pets in the Unites States, Puerto Rico, and South Africa.

The president of Menu Foods -- the first of several companies to recall pet foods -- is convinced thats what happened.

What this appears to be is a case of deliberate contamination of wheat gluten in order to pass off substandard products, the companys Paul Henderson told a U.S. House committee last week. Menu Foods recalled 60 million containers of pet in March after learning dogs and cats suffered kidney problems or died after eating the foods.

For a seller who knows how industry testing methods work, this would allow them to cheat the buyers, Henderson said.

The Chinese government disputes reports that melamine-tainted products from its country caused pets to die. But on Friday, that country banned the use of melamine in wheat gluten, rice protein, and other vegetable proteins exported from China or used in domestic food supplies.

Meanwhile, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) says the California company that imported tainted rice gluten from China has done business with that overseas supplier since August 2006. Wilber-Ellis, however, says it did not learn the products were tainted until this month.

Swimming Pool Chemical

FDA officials confirmed the rice protein is contaminated with melamine and a second chemical cyanuric acid.

That second contaminant -- detected in the rice protein and wheat gluten in some pet foods -- is used to boost the protein content of foods, FDA officials said. Its also a stabilizer in outdoor swimming pools and hot tubs.

"The combination of melamine and cyanuric acid is of concern to human and animal health," said Captain David Elder, director of the FDA's Office of Enforcement Office of Regulatory Affairs. "Melamine, at detected levels, is not a human health concern.

Meanwhile, the FDA is tracing all the pet food and animal feed made with the rice protein Wilbur-Ellis has imported since August 2006.

More Recalls

As the investigation continues, so do the recalls. Two more pet food companies have recalled their products because they may contain adulterated rice protein imported from China.

And that tainted ingredient, the companies say, was added without their consent.

Sierra Pet Products recalled its Harmony Farms canned dog and cat foods and Health Bar biscuits.

The manufacturer of all Harmony Farms cans and biscuits informed (us) that they had been adding rice protein concentrate to Harmony Farms canned dog and cat foods without (our) approval, Sierra Pet Products said on its Web site.

The company added: It appears that American Nutrition, Inc. (ANI) had been adding the unauthorized rice protein concentrate to Harmony Farms products for some time and only told (us) when the FDA was about to conclude that some of ANIs rice protein concentrate (supplied by Wilber-Ellis) was contaminated with melamine.

Sierra Pet Products said it has stopped doing business with ANI. The company also said none of its products have tested positive for melamine and it has not received any reports of illnesses linked to its foods.

We intend to re-introduce our canned products and dog biscuits as soon as we can obtain a manufacturing partner who shares our values of honesty and integrity, the company said.

Natural Balance Pet Foods also recalled more of its food after learning ANI added potentially-tainted rice protein to four of its canned productswithout the companys knowledge or consent.

Those recalled products are:
• Chicken Formula Canned Dog Food 13 oz;
• Lamb Formula Canned Dog Food 13 oz;
• Beef Formula Canned Dog Food 13 oz;
• Ocean Fish Formula Canned Cat Food 3 oz & 6 oz

Natural Balance says there are no reports of illnesses linked to these foods.

To make sure that this does not happen in the future, we are demanding from each of our co-manufacturers daily production record of all of our formulas before they are shipped to us and written certification of NO rice protein or any deviation of our formulas, the company wrote on its Web site.

We have reviewed all of our other products and determined that they are free of rice protein concentrate and that all of our other product labels are accurate.

Service Dog

Spencer

News of any Natural Balance recall strikes a frightening chord with Laura F. of Lakeport, California.

Her survival, she says, depends on the health and safety of her dog, Spencer.

The seven-year-old Standard Poodle is a specially-trained service dog, who helped her learn how to walk after a debilitating back injury.

He goes everywhere with me, the Lakeport, California, woman says. He picks up things for me and helps me with my stabilityhe gives me an extra four legs.

Thats why she panicked when Spencer became sick earlier this month after eating a new bag of Natural Balance Venison and Brown Rice dog food.

He started throwing up and continued to throw up for two days in a row, Laura says. He just had a hard time keeping food down.

Her fears increased when she learned Natural Balance had recalled its Venison and Brown Rice formula for dogs because it was made with potentially contaminated rice gluten.

I was very, very frightened. If I didnt have a service dog, I dont know what Id do. Spencer is so important to me.

Laura immediately took the 60-pound service dog to her veterinarians office.

They ran some blood tests on him and hes fine, she says. But how do I test for melamine in my dogs body? Does it show up in three days, a monthI still dont know.

Spencer, who is also a trained therapy dog, is now eating another brand of Natural Balance one thats not on the recall list.

And thats working out OK. He hasnt thrown up since.

Of the entire pet food recall, Laura says: I think its awful and its very frightening for people. Why dont the manufacturers know whats going into their foods and why isnt the food being tested as well as it should be?

Something positive, however, may come from this crisis, Laura says.

In the long run, I think more testing will be involved and there will be more scrutiny by pet food companies about what they put into their foods.

She adds: I just hope this will all be over soon.



Spiked Pet Food Nothing New to Chinese, Times Finds...

Pet Food Fall-Out Continues, with Recalls, Raids, Lawsuits


The fall-out from the massive pet food recall continues as the scope of the contamination widens into the human food supply, more companies recall their products, and a major pet food manufacturer company sues its suppliers.

In the latest wave of pet food recall activity:

• Meat from 345 hogs that ate feed made with melamine-tainted rice protein has apparently entered the market, the Associated Press reported. The United States Department of Agriculture also reported that pigs from slaughterhouses in Kansas and Utah may have entered the food supply. In addition, federal authorities quarantined some 6,000 pigs -- on farms in eight states -- that were given feed made with tainted ingredients;

• Diamond Pet Foods recalled three canned products made by American Nutrition Inc.: Diamond Lamb & Rice Formula for Dogs, Chicken Soup for the Pet Lover's Soul Kitten Formula, and Chicken Soup for the Pet Lover's Soul Puppy Formula. The company says these products contain melamine-tainted rice gluten imported from China;

• Chenango Valley Pet Foods recalled four of its dry dog foods: Drs. Foster & Smith Chicken & Brown Rice Formula Adult Lite Dog Food; Drs. Foster & Smith Chicken & Brown Rice Adult Lite Cat Food; Lick Your Chops Lamb Meal, Rice & Egg Cat Food; and Bulk Chicken & Brown Rice Formula Adult Lite Dog Food sold to one consignee (SmartPak). The company took this action after learning the products contain potentially contaminated rice protein;

• The Blue Buffalo Company removed all its canned and biscuit products from retail distribution after learning that American Nutrition Inc. (ANI) -- the manufacturer of its cans and biscuits -- added rice protein concentrate to the products without its knowledge. This is product tampering, and it apparently has been going on for some time, the company said. The can formulas that we developed, and trusted them to produce, never contained any rice protein concentrate. ANI received the rice protein from an importer whose ingredients have tested positive for melamine. Blue Buffalo says none of its BLUE or Spa Select canned precuts have tested positive for melamine;

• Menu Foods, the company that announced the nationwide pet food recall in March, sued its supplier, ChemNutra, for allegedly sending contaminated wheat gluten to its plant in Emporia, Kansas, according to the Emporia Gazette. The lawsuit, filed in Lyon County District Court, seeks a judgment substantially in excess $75,000 and asks that ChemNutra protect Menu Foods from all costs associated with the recall and any related lawsuits. Menu Foods prides itself on providing customers with wet pet food products made with high quality ingredients, the companys attorneys stated in the court petition. In 2006, ChemNutra promised Menu Foods that it could supply one such high quality ingredient, wheat gluten, to Menu Foods. ChemNutra breached its promise.

• The Food and Drug Administration raided the Las Vegas office of ChemNutra. The FDA is investigating whether the company violated the Food, Drug & Cosmetic Act, according to wire reports out of Las Vegas. The FDA has told ChemNutra that the company be held accountable because it imported the melamine-tainted wheat gluten that triggered one of the current pet food recallseven though it had no prior knowledge that its Chinese supplier put the chemical in the product;

• FDA agents also searched Menu Food's production facility in Emporia, Kansas, news outlets reported. Menu Foods said the U.S. Attorney's offices in Kansas and the western district of Missouri have targeted the company as part of misdemeanor investigations into whether it violated the federal Food, Drug & Cosmetic Act, the AP reported. The sale of adulterated or contaminated food is a misdemeanor. A Justice Department spokeswoman had no immediate comment. "Menu Foods has been doing everything it can to cooperate with the FDA," company chief executive officer Paul Henderson said in a statement. "Even before commencement of this investigation we have given the FDA full access to our plant and our records, have answered questions and provided documents to them any time they have asked." The FDA would not comment on the search warrants.

• China banned the use of melamine from its food products, the AP reported. Thats the chemical blamed for causing illnesses and deaths in scores of across the country. China, however, denied charges that the chemical caused the pets deaths. "At present, there is no clear evidence showing that melamine is the direct cause of the poisoning or death of the pets," China's Foreign Ministry said in a statement. "China is willing to strengthen cooperation with the U.S. side ... to find out the real cause leading to the pet deaths in order to protect the health of the pets of the two countries."

Quarantined Hogs

The hogs that ate the contaminated pet food scraps are now under federal quarantine on farms in California, New York, South Carolina, North Carolina, Utah, Kansas, Oklahoma and Ohio, government officials said.

The pigs are believed to have eaten salvage pet food contaminated with two chemicals: melamine and cyanuric acid.

FDA officials say cyanuric acid -- detected in the rice protein and wheat gluten used in some pet foods -- is used to boost the protein content of foods. It also a stabilizer in outdoor swimming pools and hot tubs.

"The combination of melamine and cyanuric acid is of concern to human and animal health," said Captain David Elder, director of the FDA's Office of Enforcement Office of Regulatory Affairs. "Melamine, at detected levels, is not a human health concern.

The tainted pet food scraps were sent to pig farmers as salvage by companies that have recalled pet foods.

Elder said pigs that ate this contaminated feed will not be allowed to enter the human food supply.

He emphasized, however, that "based on information currently available, the FDA and the USDA believe the likelihood of illness after eating such pork is extremely low. However, the agencies also believe it is prudent to take this measure."

The pork from these animals will also be destroyed, officials said. And the USDA will compensate hog farmers affected by the tainted pet food. Owners of pets killed by the tainted pet food, on the other hand, get nothing.

The FDA is also investigating the possibility that contaminated pet food scraps found their way to a poultry feed mill in Missouri, according to AP.

In related news, the FDA said China has granted visas to U.S. food inspectors who want to examine the facilities that manufactured the tainted rice protein and wheat gluten.

Menu Foods Lawsuit

That tainted wheat gluten is at the heart of the lawsuit Menu Foods filed against its supplier, ChemNutra.

The tainted ingredient is blamed for the deaths and illnesses of scores of dogs and cats across the country and triggered Menu Foods recall of more than 60 million containers of pet food.

Earlier this week, Menu Foods President Paul Henderson told a Congressional hearing the wheat gluten may have been spiked with melamine to increase its protein content.

What this appears to be is a case of deliberate contamination of wheat gluten in order to pass off substandard product, Henderson told a U.S. House committee. For a seller who knows how industry testing methods work, this would allow them to cheat the buyers.

ChemNutra Chief Executive Officer Steve Miller said his company has been the victim of deliberate and mercenary contamination by its supplier.

We assure you that we will never again do business with the supplier of the suspect wheat gluten, XuZhou Anying Biologic Technology Development Co., Ltd., Miller said in a letter posted on his companys Web site. ...We hope that U.S. and Chinese investigations of XuZhou Anying reveal what actually occurred.

Regarding this weeks raid of ChemNutras office, Miller said: We have cooperated and complied fully with FDA investigators both prior to and since being served with todays search warrant, and will continue to do so. We keep very good records, which has made it relatively easy for the investigators to retrieve what they needed.

We also now believe that our wheat gluten customer, Menu Foods, used significantly more wheat gluten monthly than we supplied to them, so we hope that Menu Foods will disclose its other sources to the FDA to ensure that any suspect product is quarantined, Mille added.

Miller said his company quarantined the suspect wheat gluten immediately after learning it might be linked to illnesses in pets.

We can only hope that Menu Foods has taken steps to ensure that this situation will not be allowed to spread even farther because of its inaction, he said, adding Menu Foods had apparently been aware (of this problem) for some time.

Pet Food Fall-Out Continues, with Recalls, Raids, Lawsuits...

Melamine Found in North Carolina Hogs


A chemical blamed for the illnesses and deaths of scores of pets across the nation has been found in hogs at a farm in western North Carolina, state officials said.

Meanwhile, Drs. Foster & Smith recalled dry cat and dog food and consumer groups planned a series of marches and postcard campaigns to press for more government action.

Officials also discovered the chemical, melamine, in feed samples collected on the farm and tested by the North Carolina Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services. Tests revealed the presence of melamine in the urine of all the hogs that consumed the tainted feed.

None of the hogs, however, entered the food supply, said Mary Ann McBride, assistant state veterinarian for the North Carolina Department of Agriculture.

"We want to make sure people understand that all the N.C. animals that may have come in contact with this feed are accounted for and none have entered the food supply," she said. "Based on what we know now, we have no reason to believe that there is any risk associated with the N.C. pork supply at this time."

The farm has 1,400 hogs and is now under quarantine. "All animals are healthy, but we are taking this action out of extreme caution," McBride said.

State officials took urine samples from 13 hogs and all tested positive for melamine, a chemical used to manufacture plastics and fertilizer.

The Food and Drug Administration notified North Carolina last week that it was one of six states to receive shipments of potentially contaminated pet food. That pet food--sold to the farm for pig feed--came from a Diamond Pet plant in Gaston, S.C., and contained melamine-laced rice protein concentrate recalled last week by its importer in California.

Pet food with cosmetic blemishes is often sold to farms as a protein source to be custom-blended into a balanced hog feed, officials say.

The North Carolina pig farm is the only one in that state to receive the tainted feed, officials said. McBride said state officials are now waiting to hear if federal officials will consider the pork contaminated.

"We're kind of in a holding pattern until we hear from our federal partners about what should happen with these hogs," she said.

Meanwhile, investigators are analyzing farms in South Carolina, California, New York, Utah and maybe Ohio, to see if hogs in those states consumed melamine-tainted feed.

Earlier tests have confirmed the presence of melamine in at least two imported Chinese vegetable proteins used to make pet foodswheat gluten and rice protein concentrate.

Pet food companies have recalled more than 100 brands of food--made with these melamine-laced ingredients--since the first reports of animal deaths and illnesses surfaced last month.

Latest Pet Food Recalls

Drs. Foster & Smith has recalled its Adult Lite Dry Dog Food and its Adult Dry Cat food. Other pet foods made with rice protein have tested positive for melamine, a chemical commonly used in plastics and fertilizers.

Drs. Foster & Smith, however, said preliminary tests of its food have found no traces of melamine.

The company said it received the rice protein from importer Wilbur-Ellis. Earlier this month, Wilbur-Ellis recalled all its rice protein after the FDA detected melamine in the product.

Wilbur-Ellis said it shipped the tainted rice protein to five pet food manufacturers located in Utah, New York, Kansas and Missouri. The company didn't disclose the names of those manufacturers, but Drs. Foster & Smith is the fifth pet food maker to recall its product made with the suspect rice protein.

The four other pet food companies are Natural Balance, The Blue Buffalo Company, Royal Canin USA, and SmartPak.

Drs. Foster & Smith said it's reformulating the products to eliminate the rice protein. The new formula should be available in Mid-March, the company said on its Web site. None of the company's other products are included in the recall.

Customers with questions about the recalled foods can call the company at 1-800-239-7121.

About Time

Pet owner Terri B. of Virginia says it's about time Drs. Foster & Smith recalled its products.

She contacted the company with concerns about the safety of its foods more than a week ago -- after reports first surfaced that rice gluten used in pet foods contained melamine.

"Only after several e-mails and many questions from me did they finally tell me via e-mail to stop feeding my pets this food," the Chilhowie, Virginia, woman told ConsumerAffairs.com on Tuesday.

"My dog's had $500 (worth of) tests, but the results are not back yet. Needless to say I am worried sick.

"This is unacceptable. The public has a right to know that a company's food contain harmful ingredients."

Since Mid-March, pet food makers have recalled 100 brands of dog and cat food made with melamine-laced wheat gluten or rice protein imported from China.

The FDA has confirmed 16 animals have died after eating the tainted pet food, but it expects that number to be much higher.

The Web site Petconnection.com says it's received 4,474 reports of deceased pets in the wake of the recall. Of that number, 2,288 are cats and 2,186 are dogs. The total number of affected pets, the site says, is 13,801. These are not official numbers; they're self-reported figures.

"But if even a fraction could be confirmed, they show deaths far exceeding the FDA's count of 16 pets, most of whom died in a manufacturers feeding trial," the site states.

Petconnection.com says other sources also support higher numbers of deaths and illnesses linked to the contaminated pet food, including:

• The Oregon State Public Heath Veterinarian -- 45 dead;
• The Michigan State Veterinary Association -- 52 dead;
• The Veterinary Information Network (VIN)--It estimates 2,000 to 7,000 pets may die based on its survey of VIN member veterinarians. The network also estimates the cost of veterinary care for these animals will be $2 to $20 million.

My Pet Counts! Postcard Blitz

Meanwhile, pet owners who've lost a dog or cat because of the contaminated foods are encouraged to voice their concerns in the nationwide "My Pet Counts! Postcard Blitz."

Pet owners are asked to make a post card with a picture of their deceased dog or cat -- and a brief message about their loss -- and mail it this Saturday (April 28) to the following governmental and media representatives:

Marcia K. Larkins, D.V.M
FDA Center for Veterinary Medicine
Ombudsman
7519 Standish Place HFV-7
Rockville, MD 20855

Senator Richard Durbin
309 Hart Senate Office Building
Washington, DC 20510

Your state's U.S. Senators (http://www.senate.gov)

The White House
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW
Washington, DC 20500

Organizers say they want the event to "demonstrate the full scope of this pet food recall disaster.

"The FDA continues to publicize only '16 confirmed deaths,'" organizers say. "Reliable sources report that the number of pet deaths are and will be much higher -- most likely in the thousands. By sticking to the 'only 16 confirmed deaths' wording, this disaster is being grossly minimized. The word must get out."

National March

The postcard blitz coincides with Saturday's national march by the group Pets Need A Voice Too.

Founder Jen Hoeflein of Bastrop, Texas, organized Saturday's "Keep Our Pets Safe" march to memorialize pets that have died in the wake of the recall and draw attention to what she calls "an outrageous situation."

"The march is a direct response from people all over the country and Canada who felt an overwhelming need to speak in outrage over the lack of safety standards in regard to pet food and the corporate negligence in allowing the food to remain on the shelves prior to the recall," Hoeflein told ConsumerAffairs.com.

The march is planned for 10 a.m. this Saturday in several cities across the country, including Atlanta, Boston, Chicago, Dallas and San Diego.

Hoeflein founded the group after losing her three-year-old cat, Timber last November to liver failure.

"He was consuming Hill Country Fare's canned cat food on a regular basis. He rapidly became ill and in horror, our family watched him slip into a near-death stage. As soon as the vet's office opened the next morning, he was put to sleep to end his suffering.

"It's a complete outrage that Timber's suffering was mirrored all over the country, different animals, different families with the outcome the same," she says. "And still, the tainted food sat on the store shelves. In fact, some of it is still there. That's simply appalling."

Hoeflein says her organization represents average citizens affected by the pet food debacle.

"I think Americans have forgotten how powerful their individual voices are when it comes to protecting their families and in many American households, pets are considered members of their families," she says. "This event has created a passion-driven response, an outcry for accountability, and the demand for the meeting of product quality standards."

Saturday's march is the first step in what Hoeflein hopes will become a campaign to ensure the protection of pets. She says this network of committed pet owners plan to keep pressure on lawmakers and government agencies to make sure tainted ingredients never again make their way into the food supply.

"We want people to understand we are simply giving a voice to sadness and pain, to frustration and outrage," Hoeflein says. "People need that and our pets deserve that. Hopefully, that voice will result in better days for pets and owners alike."

Thousands of hogs in the United States -- in at least six states -- may have eaten livestock feed contaminated with the chemical melamine, the Food and Drug Administration said.

And health officials are now investigating the possibility that humans may have consumed food containing the chemical that triggered a nationwide recall of pet food.

California officials confirmed hogs at a farm in that state ate the contaminated food -- described as salvaged pet food or pet food scraps. Officials were also trying to determine if hogs in five other states -- New York, North Carolina, South Carolina, Utah, and Ohio -- ate the tainted food.

The FDA has confirmed the urine of some hogs in California, North Carolina and South Carolina tested positive for melamine.

When asked if any of the hogs had entered the human food supply, FDA's Chief veterinarian Stephen Sundlof said: "At this point, I don't have a definitive answer other than to say that the issue is being addressed."

FDA officials are working with the U.S. Department of Agriculture and several states to investigate the now-quarantined farms and determine if those hogs were slaughtered for human food.

"I don't have the numbers on that right now, but it potentially affects thousands of hogs," Sundlof said. "Some of the hog operations were fairly sizable."

USDA spokesman Steve Cohen, however, said the tainted feed was sold to smaller and independent hog farms.

Poultry Also Suspect

The FDA also said a poultry farm in Missouri may have received the melamine-tainted feed. Tests have confirmed the wheat gluten and rice protein used to make pet food in the United States -- and blamed for the deaths and kidney problems in scores pets across the country -- was tainted with melamine. Officials in South Africa also discovered the chemical in the corn gluten used to make pet food in that country.

Melamine is commonly used in plastics and fertilizers, but is not approved for pet food. The World Health Organization does not classify melamine as a carcinogen for people, but says there's little research about the chemical's effect on humans.

Also on Tuesday, the FDA said it discovered a second, related chemical called cyanuric acid -- used in swimming pool chlorination -- contaminated rice protein samples.

The Pittsburgh Tribune-Review reported that researchers identified three other contaminants in the urine and kidneys of animals sickened or killed after eating the recalled pet foods. The paper identified those contaminants as cyanuric acid, amilorine, and amiloride -- all byproducts of melamine.

One researcher told The Tribune-Review that cyanuric acid is what most likely made the pets sick.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Web site described the long term or repeated exposure to cyanuric acid as: "When ingested in large amounts the substance may have effects on the kidneys, resulting in tissue lesions."

In related news ...

• The FDA said it would inspect six grain products imported from China and used to make everything from bread to baby formula for traces of melamine. Those grain products include wheat gluten, corn gluten, corn meal, soy protein, rice bran, and rice protein. "We're going to target firms that we know are receiving imported products," David Acheson, chief medical officer of the FDA's Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, told reporters on Tuesday. "The goal is obviously to sample as much as we can."

• The FDA said it's now sampling all wheat gluten, rice protein, and corn gluten coming into the United States from China for melamine;

• Another pet food company -- SmartPak -- has recalled products made with tainted rice protein. The company recalled a single production run of its LiveSmart Weight Management Chicken and Brown Rice Dog Food;

• The California Agriculture Department is trying to contact 50 people who bought pork that may have come from pigs who ate feed containing melamine. State officials recommended consumers not eat the meat, but said the health risks are minimal;

• The Center for Science in the Public Interest (CPSI) called for the U.S. to ban the imports of wheat gluten, rice protein, and other grain products from China until the FDA can certify the products are safe. The CSPI also recommended the FDA should evaluate whether a ban is needed for other foods or ingredients coming from China -- the source of the contaminated gluten linked to the largest-ever recall of pet food.

No Ban Planned

The FDA says it has no plans to ban the imports of wheat gluten, rice protein, or similar products from China.

"We believe the safety net is in place to make sure that no additional products are going to get into the commerce of the United States," David Elder, director of FDA's enforcement office, told reporters.

Several pet food companies -- including Menu Foods, Procter & Gamble, and Nestle SA -- have recalled more than 100 brands of pet food made with melamine-tainted wheat gluten since Mid-March.

And at least five companies have made pet food containing rice protein contaminated with melamine.

FDA officials say the chemical may have intentionally been added to increase the protein content.

The FDA says there were no direct shipments of those two ingredients to firms that make food for humans or for animals used as food.

Release the Names

Release the names of companies that received contaminated rice protein from China and identify and inspect all suspect pet food ingredients imported from all countries.

That's the message two U.S. Senators sent to the Food and Drug Administration on Monday.

The request by Senators Dick Durbin (D-IL) and Marie Cantwell, (D-WA) follows reports that rice protein and corn gluten tainted with the chemical melamine have been used in pet food and may have entered the human food chain.

Earlier reports identified the contaminated ingredient used in more than 100 brands of recalled pet food -- and linked to scores of illnesses and deaths in dogs and cats across the country -- as melamine-tainted wheat gluten.

A House committee heard testimony Tuesday that American food is at high risk for both natural and terrorist-related outbreaks and many in Congress are questioning whether the Food and Drug Administration can adequately protect Americans.

"Over the past week, shipments of imported rice protein and corn gluten have been discovered to be contaminated with melamine," the Senators wrote in their letter to FDA Commissioner Andrew von Eschenbach. "In addition, we have learned that the human food supply may be at risk from tainted pet food sold to a hog feeding operation in California.

"Once again, our food supply has been put at risk by contaminated ingredients that originated overseas and were never inspected by the FDA."

Earlier this month, the Chinese company, Binzhou-Futian, sold rice protein to U.S. importer Wilbur-Ellis and a second, unknown, company. Wilbur-Ellis said it distributed that rice protein to five pet food manufacturers.

Three of those manufacturers have recalled their pet foods; the names of the other two companies, however, are not known.

The Senators say that's not acceptable.

"Given the strong possibility that these two pet food manufacturers also received contaminated rice protein and that they have failed to implement voluntary recalls, we believe the FDA should release the names of these manufacturers and require them to trace and recall any pet food made with the potentially contaminated rice protein," they told the FDA's Commissioner.

The Senators also asked the FDA to:

• Immediately start testing samples of rice protein and corn gluten imported from China. The FDA is already testing wheat gluten imported from that country;

• Identify and inspect all suspect pet food ingredients imported from China and other countries. "In light of the strong possibility that these protein sources were purposefully contaminated for economic purposes, we are concerned about the safety of other imported pet food ingredients and the possibility of them being contaminated," the Senators said.

• Study the feasibility of testing protein-based pet food ingredients imported from China and other countries for melamine;

• Work with the Chinese Government and other foreign governments to inspect their facilities and provide technical assistance to improve their food safety standards.

"The FDA owes the American public their best effort to prevent contaminated food from getting to store shelves and to remove contaminated food that is already on shelves before more pets die," the Senators wrote, adding 63 percent of Americans own a cat or dog.

Pet Owners Snarl

A pet owner in Florida told ConsumerAffairs.com that she's outraged by the FDA's refusal to disclose all the companies that received the contaminated rice protein.

"Family pets are being killed and the FDA is dragging its feet," said Marlene B. of Port Charlotte, Florida. "I want to know how the hell the FDA can refuse to name the other two pet food manufacturers that received contaminated goods from China.

"If it were a medicine for human consumption, they'd be the first to scream 'danger' and yank the products off the shelves, before any conclusive tests had been done. This is outrageous."

And it's happening at a time when pets across the country continue to develop kidney disease or die after eating the melamine-tainted food.

Kennel Destroyed

Consider the impact one brand of the recalled pet food had on the Cavalier King Charles Spaniels at a kennel in Texas.

"Our kennel has been destroyed by Natural Balance Dog Food," Dave and Jennifer S. of Victoria, Texas, said referring to the pet food recalled last week. "We are left devastated and desperately in need of help."

Several or their dogs went into renal failure -- and two died -- after eating Natural Balance's Venison and Brown Rice food.

"We had a total of 12 Cavaliers, two have died, four puppies remain in the hospital, as well as three adults," said the couple, who took their dogs to Texas A & M University's Small Animal Emergency Clinic for treatment.

"The three adults may not recover at all. It is still hopeful for the puppies. We have one adult Cavalier at home, one six-month-old puppy at home, and one puppy that is eight weeks old that has been able to come home. They still require follow-up testing to ensure that they are not going back into renal failure."

The couple added: "The doctors met with us and confirmed that it was the Natural Balance Venison and Brown Rice Dog food that is the cause (of their dogs' sickness and deaths.) The autopsy on Abby (one of the dogs) confirmed the crystal formation that is seen in all the renal failure cases concerning the recent dog food recalls."

Natural Balance, they say, may compensate them for our vet bills.

But only if they sign a release "which basically makes it so they do not have to pay anything except the vet bill."

More about the Pet Food Recall ...

Melamine Found in North Carolina Hogs...

Thousands of Hogs May Have Eaten Contaminated Feed


Thousands of hogs in the United States -- in at least six states -- may have eaten livestock feed contaminated with the chemical melamine, the Food and Drug Administration said.

And health officials are now investigating the possibility that humans may have consumed food containing the chemical that triggered a nationwide recall of pet food.

California officials confirmed hogs at a farm in that state ate the contaminated food -- described as salvaged pet food or pet food scraps. Officials were also trying to determine if hogs in five other states -- New York, North Carolina, South Carolina, Utah, and Ohio -- ate the tainted food.

The FDA has confirmed the urine of some hogs in California, North Carolina and South Carolina tested positive for melamine.

When asked if any of the hogs had entered the human food supply, FDA's Chief veterinarian Stephen Sundlof said: "At this point, I don't have a definitive answer other than to say that the issue is being addressed."

FDA officials are working with the U.S. Department of Agriculture and several states to investigate the now-quarantined farms and determine if those hogs were slaughtered for human food.

"I don't have the numbers on that right now, but it potentially affects thousands of hogs," Sundlof said. "Some of the hog operations were fairly sizable."

USDA spokesman Steve Cohen, however, said the tainted feed was sold to smaller and independent hog farms.

Poultry Also Suspect

The FDA also said a poultry farm in Missouri may have received the melamine-tainted feed. Tests have confirmed the wheat gluten and rice protein used to make pet food in the United States -- and blamed for the deaths and kidney problems in scores pets across the country -- was tainted with melamine. Officials in South Africa also discovered the chemical in the corn gluten used to make pet food in that country.

Melamine is commonly used in plastics and fertilizers, but is not approved for pet food. The World Health Organization does not classify melamine as a carcinogen for people, but says there's little research about the chemical's effect on humans.

Also on Tuesday, the FDA said it discovered a second, related chemical called cyanuric acid -- used in swimming pool chlorination -- contaminated rice protein samples.

The Pittsburgh Tribune-Review reported that researchers identified three other contaminants in the urine and kidneys of animals sickened or killed after eating the recalled pet foods. The paper identified those contaminants as cyanuric acid, amilorine, and amiloride -- all byproducts of melamine.

One researcher told The Tribune-Review that cyanuric acid is what most likely made the pets sick.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Web site described the long term or repeated exposure to cyanuric acid as: "When ingested in large amounts the substance may have effects on the kidneys, resulting in tissue lesions."

In related news ...

• The FDA said it would inspect six grain products imported from China and used to make everything from bread to baby formula for traces of melamine. Those grain products include wheat gluten, corn gluten, corn meal, soy protein, rice bran, and rice protein. "We're going to target firms that we know are receiving imported products," David Acheson, chief medical officer of the FDA's Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, told reporters on Tuesday. "The goal is obviously to sample as much as we can."

• The FDA said it's now sampling all wheat gluten, rice protein, and corn gluten coming into the United States from China for melamine;

• Another pet food company -- SmartPak -- has recalled products made with tainted rice protein. The company recalled a single production run of its LiveSmart Weight Management Chicken and Brown Rice Dog Food;

• The California Agriculture Department is trying to contact 50 people who bought pork that may have come from pigs who ate feed containing melamine. State officials recommended consumers not eat the meat, but said the health risks are minimal;

• The Center for Science in the Public Interest (CPSI) called for the U.S. to ban the imports of wheat gluten, rice protein, and other grain products from China until the FDA can certify the products are safe. The CSPI also recommended the FDA should evaluate whether a ban is needed for other foods or ingredients coming from China -- the source of the contaminated gluten linked to the largest-ever recall of pet food.

No Ban Planned

The FDA says it has no plans to ban the imports of wheat gluten, rice protein, or similar products from China.

"We believe the safety net is in place to make sure that no additional products are going to get into the commerce of the United States," David Elder, director of FDA's enforcement office, told reporters.

Several pet food companies -- including Menu Foods, Procter & Gamble, and Nestle SA -- have recalled more than 100 brands of pet food made with melamine-tainted wheat gluten since Mid-March.

And at least five companies have made pet food containing rice protein contaminated with melamine.

FDA officials say the chemical may have intentionally been added to increase the protein content.

The FDA says there were no direct shipments of those two ingredients to firms that make food for humans or for animals used as food.

Release the Names

Release the names of companies that received contaminated rice protein from China and identify and inspect all suspect pet food ingredients imported from all countries.

That's the message two U.S. Senators sent to the Food and Drug Administration on Monday.

The request by Senators Dick Durbin (D-IL) and Marie Cantwell, (D-WA) follows reports that rice protein and corn gluten tainted with the chemical melamine have been used in pet food and may have entered the human food chain.

Earlier reports identified the contaminated ingredient used in more than 100 brands of recalled pet food -- and linked to scores of illnesses and deaths in dogs and cats across the country -- as melamine-tainted wheat gluten.

A House committee heard testimony Tuesday that American food is at high risk for both natural and terrorist-related outbreaks and many in Congress are questioning whether the Food and Drug Administration can adequately protect Americans.

"Over the past week, shipments of imported rice protein and corn gluten have been discovered to be contaminated with melamine," the Senators wrote in their letter to FDA Commissioner Andrew von Eschenbach. "In addition, we have learned that the human food supply may be at risk from tainted pet food sold to a hog feeding operation in California.

"Once again, our food supply has been put at risk by contaminated ingredients that originated overseas and were never inspected by the FDA."

Earlier this month, the Chinese company, Binzhou-Futian, sold rice protein to U.S. importer Wilbur-Ellis and a second, unknown, company. Wilbur-Ellis said it distributed that rice protein to five pet food manufacturers.

Three of those manufacturers have recalled their pet foods; the names of the other two companies, however, are not known.

The Senators say that's not acceptable.

"Given the strong possibility that these two pet food manufacturers also received contaminated rice protein and that they have failed to implement voluntary recalls, we believe the FDA should release the names of these manufacturers and require them to trace and recall any pet food made with the potentially contaminated rice protein," they told the FDA's Commissioner.

The Senators also asked the FDA to:

• Immediately start testing samples of rice protein and corn gluten imported from China. The FDA is already testing wheat gluten imported from that country;

• Identify and inspect all suspect pet food ingredients imported from China and other countries. "In light of the strong possibility that these protein sources were purposefully contaminated for economic purposes, we are concerned about the safety of other imported pet food ingredients and the possibility of them being contaminated," the Senators said.

• Study the feasibility of testing protein-based pet food ingredients imported from China and other countries for melamine;

• Work with the Chinese Government and other foreign governments to inspect their facilities and provide technical assistance to improve their food safety standards.

"The FDA owes the American public their best effort to prevent contaminated food from getting to store shelves and to remove contaminated food that is already on shelves before more pets die," the Senators wrote, adding 63 percent of Americans own a cat or dog.

Pet Owners Snarl

A pet owner in Florida told ConsumerAffairs.com that she's outraged by the FDA's refusal to disclose all the companies that received the contaminated rice protein.

"Family pets are being killed and the FDA is dragging its feet," said Marlene B. of Port Charlotte, Florida. "I want to know how the hell the FDA can refuse to name the other two pet food manufacturers that received contaminated goods from China.

"If it were a medicine for human consumption, they'd be the first to scream 'danger' and yank the products off the shelves, before any conclusive tests had been done. This is outrageous."

And it's happening at a time when pets across the country continue to develop kidney disease or die after eating the melamine-tainted food.

Kennel Destroyed

Consider the impact one brand of the recalled pet food had on the Cavalier King Charles Spaniels at a kennel in Texas.

"Our kennel has been destroyed by Natural Balance Dog Food," Dave and Jennifer S. of Victoria, Texas, said referring to the pet food recalled last week. "We are left devastated and desperately in need of help."

Several or their dogs went into renal failure -- and two died -- after eating Natural Balance's Venison and Brown Rice food.

"We had a total of 12 Cavaliers, two have died, four puppies remain in the hospital, as well as three adults," said the couple, who took their dogs to Texas A & M University's Small Animal Emergency Clinic for treatment.

"The three adults may not recover at all. It is still hopeful for the puppies. We have one adult Cavalier at home, one six-month-old puppy at home, and one puppy that is eight weeks old that has been able to come home. They still require follow-up testing to ensure that they are not going back into renal failure."

The couple added: "The doctors met with us and confirmed that it was the Natural Balance Venison and Brown Rice Dog food that is the cause (of their dogs' sickness and deaths.) The autopsy on Abby (one of the dogs) confirmed the crystal formation that is seen in all the renal failure cases concerning the recent dog food recalls."

Natural Balance, they say, may compensate them for our vet bills.

But only if they sign a release "which basically makes it so they do not have to pay anything except the vet bill."

More about the Pet Food Recall ...

Thousands of Hogs May Have Eaten Contaminated Feed...

Senators Demand FDA Release Names of All Suspect Pet Food Companies


Release the names of companies that received contaminated rice protein from China and identify and inspect all suspect pet food ingredients imported from all countries.

That's the message two U.S. Senators sent to the Food and Drug Administration on Monday.

The request by Senators Dick Durbin (D-IL) and Marie Cantwell, (D-WA) follows reports that rice protein and corn gluten tainted with the chemical melamine have been used in pet food and may have entered the human food chain.

Earlier reports identified the contaminated ingredient used in more than 100 brands of recalled pet food -- and linked to scores of illnesses and deaths in dogs and cats across the country -- as melamine-tainted wheat gluten.

A House committee heard testimony today that American food is at high risk for both natural and terrorist-related outbreaks and many in Congress are questioning whether the Food and Drug Administration can adequately protect Americans.

"Over the past week, shipments of imported rice protein and corn gluten have been discovered to be contaminated with melamine," the Senators wrote in their letter to FDA Commissioner Andrew von Eschenbach. "In addition, we have learned that the human food supply may be at risk from tainted pet food sold to a hog feeding operation in California.

"Once again, our food supply has been put at risk by contaminated ingredients that originated overseas and were never inspected by the FDA."

Earlier this month, the Chinese company, Binzhou-Futian, sold rice protein to U.S. importer Wilbur-Ellis and a second, unknown, company. Wilbur-Ellis said it distributed that rice protein to five pet food manufacturers.

Three of those manufacturers have recalled their pet foods; the names of the other two companies, however, are not known.

The Senators say that's not acceptable.

"Given the strong possibility that these two pet food manufacturers also received contaminated rice protein and that they have failed to implement voluntary recalls, we believe the FDA should release the names of these manufacturers and require them to trace and recall any pet food made with the potentially contaminated rice protein," they told the FDA's Commissioner.

The Senators also asked the FDA to:

• Immediately start testing samples of rice protein and corn gluten imported from China. The FDA is already testing wheat gluten imported from that country;

• Identify and inspect all suspect pet food ingredients imported from China and other countries. "In light of the strong possibility that these protein sources were purposefully contaminated for economic purposes, we are concerned about the safety of other imported pet food ingredients and the possibility of them being contaminated," the Senators said.

• Study the feasibility of testing protein-based pet food ingredients imported from China and other countries for melamine;

• Work with the Chinese Government and other foreign governments to inspect their facilities and provide technical assistance to improve their food safety standards.

"The FDA owes the American public their best effort to prevent contaminated food from getting to store shelves and to remove contaminated food that is already on shelves before more pets die," the Senators wrote, adding 63 percent of Americans own a cat or dog.

Pet Owners Snarl

A pet owner in Florida told ConsumerAffairs.com that she's outraged by the FDA's refusal to disclose all the companies that received the contaminated rice protein.

"Family pets are being killed and the FDA is dragging its feet," said Marlene B. of Port Charlotte, Florida. "I want to know how the hell the FDA can refuse to name the other two pet food manufacturers that received contaminated goods from China.

"If it were a medicine for human consumption, they'd be the first to scream 'danger' and yank the products off the shelves, before any conclusive tests had been done. This is outrageous."

And it's happening at a time when pets across the country continue to develop kidney disease or die after eating the melamine-tainted food.

Kennel Destroyed

Consider the impact one brand of the recalled pet food had on the Cavalier King Charles Spaniels at a kennel in Texas.

"Our kennel has been destroyed by Natural Balance Dog Food," Dave and Jennifer S. of Victoria, Texas, said referring to the pet food recalled last week. "We are left devastated and desperately in need of help."

Several or their dogs went into renal failure -- and two died -- after eating Natural Balance's Venison and Brown Rice food.

"We had a total of 12 Cavaliers, two have died, four puppies remain in the hospital, as well as three adults," said the couple, who took their dogs to Texas A & M University's Small Animal Emergency Clinic for treatment.

"The three adults may not recover at all. It is still hopeful for the puppies. We have one adult Cavalier at home, one six-month-old puppy at home, and one puppy that is eight weeks old that has been able to come home. They still require follow-up testing to ensure that they are not going back into renal failure."

The couple added: "The doctors met with us and confirmed that it was the Natural Balance Venison and Brown Rice Dog food that is the cause (of their dogs' sickness and deaths.) The autopsy on Abby (one of the dogs) confirmed the crystal formation that is seen in all the renal failure cases concerning the recent dog food recalls."

Natural Balance, they say, may compensate them for our vet bills.

But only if they sign a release "which basically makes it so they do not have to pay anything except the vet bill."

More about the Pet Food Recall ...

Senators Demand FDA Release Names of All Suspect Pet Food Companies...

South Africa Bans Gluten Products from China as Pet Poisonings Spread


The pet food industry in South Africa will no longer accept any gluten products imported from China. That decision comes on the heels of Royal Canin SA's discovery of the chemical melamine in the ingredients.

Royal Canin SA said tests revealed the corn gluten -- used in dog and cat dry pet food products manufactured by Vets Choice and Royal Canin -- was tainted with melamine. That corn gluten came from China.

The company, which manufacturers Royal Canin premium dog and cat food and the cheaper brand Vets Choice, recalled the products last week because they'd caused kidney failure in dogs and cats, according to reports in The Namibian, an independent daily newspaper published in Windhoek, and allAfrica.com.

The South African Veterinary Association said 30 dogs that had eaten the tainted food have died across the country in the past two weeks. The Associated Press reported the pets died from renal failure.

In related news, Royal Canin USA recalled five brands of its Sensible Choice dry dog food and three brands of its Veterinary Diet food last Friday after learning the rice protein in the products was tainted with what the company calls "a melamine derivative."

The company also said it will no longer use any Chinese suppliers for any of its vegetable proteins. Royal Canin USA said there are no confirmed reports of illnesses linked to the foods, but as a precautionary measure recalled the following brands of its Sensible Choice pet foods:

• Chicken Meal & Rice Formula Senior DRY DOG FOOD;
• Lamb Meal & Rice Formula Puppy DRY DOG FOOD;
• Lamb Meal & Rice Formula Adult DRY DOG FOOD;
• Lamb Meal & Rice Formula Senior DRY DOG FOOD;
• Rice & Catfish Meal Formula Adult DRY DOG FOOD

The company also recalled the following veterinary diet brands:

• Canine Early Cardiac EC 22;
• Canine Skin Support SS21;
• Feline Hypoallergenic HP23

"We are taking this proactive stance to voluntarily recall these products to avoid any confusion for our customers about which Royal Canin USA products are safe and which products may be affected," the company said on its Web site.

Pet owners with questions can call the company at 1-800-592-6687.

Meanwhile, the Food and Drug Administration say the ingredients imported from China -- and used in the more than 100 brands of recalled pet foods -- may have been intentionally spiked with an industrial chemical to boost their apparent protein content.

That's one theory the FDA is pursuing as it investigates how melamine contaminated at least two ingredients used to make the recalled pet foods in the United States: wheat gluten and rice protein concentrate.

There's also confirmation that the corn gluten used in some pet food in South Africa contained melamine.

Tests revealed melamine in both wheat gluten and rice protein concentrate -- imported from China -- used in the pet foods linked to scores of kidney illnesses and deaths in dogs and cats across the country.

"Melamine was found in all three of those it would certainly lend credibility to the theory that it may be intentional," Stephen Sundlof, the FDA's chief veterinarian, told reporters last week. "That will be one of the theories we will pursue when we get into the plants in China."

Infected Hogs

Over the weekend, the FDA announced it has opened a criminal investigation after learning more than 100 hogs were given feed that contained melamine-tainted rice protein.

The California Department of Food and Agriculture (CDFA) said its testing had detected melamine in the urine from hogs at the American Hog Farm in Ceres, California.

The hogs were slaughtered in California's Central Valley.

Consumers who bought pork from the American Hog Farm between April 3 and April 18 are advised not to eat the meat.

California health officials, however, said there are no reports of illness in either people or the hogs. Authorities are trying to track down all the purchasers.

"The risk is minimal, but the investigation is very early on," said Kevin Reilly of the California Department of Health Services.

Sundlof said criminal charges are a possibility, although it is no yet known if there was any criminal intent.

The FDA also announced it's investigating the imported shipment of melamine-tainted rice protein concentrate used in pet foods.

To date, the FDA says it's established:
• That shipment of rice protein concentrate was imported and offloaded during the week of April 2, 2007 by the San Francisco-based Wilbur-Ellis, an importer and distributor of agricultural products. The rice protein came from Binzhou Futian Biological Technology in China;;
• The shipment consisted primarily of rice protein concentrate in white bags, but also included one pink bag that was labeled, in part, with the word "melamine;"
• On April 15, Wilbur-Ellis notified FDA's Center for Veterinary Medicine about the suspect shipment. On April 16, the FDA launched a nationwide investigation that revealed eight import entries -- shipped from the Chinese firm -- since July 2006. FDA testing revealed melamine in both the white and pink bags;
• Wilbur-Ellis recalled all of the rice protein concentrate it had imported from that Chinese company.
• FDA investigators obtained records showing five pet food manufacturers -- in seven locations -- received the tainted rice protein. Investigators are currently inspecting those manufacturers and collecting additional samples;
• The FDA initiated inspections at Royal Canin USA and C.J. Foods and, as a result, both companies recalled certain products;
• FDA also confirmed the presence of melamine in some pet food products containing rice protein concentrate. Natural Balance Pet Foods recalled these foods as a result of that finding: Venison and Brown Rice canned and bagged dog foods; Venison and Brown Rice dog treats; and Venison and Green Pea dry cat food.

The FDA is now sampling all rice protein concentrate from China and continues to sample all wheat gluten imported from that country. The federal agency says it's ready to increase its surveillance of other products, if necessary.

South Africa Bans Gluten Products from China as Pet Poisonings Spread...

Article Image

China Blocks U.S. Inspectors Seeking Answers to Pet Poisonings


The Chinese government has blocked requests from the Food and Drug Administration to inspect the facilities suspected of producing contaminated products that triggered a massive pet food recall in the United States.

Rice protein concentrate
Source: Binzhou Futian Biology Technology, Ltd. Web site

That action prompted U.S. Senator Dick Durbin (D-Il) and Rep. Rosa DeLauro (D-CT) on Wednesday to send a letter to the Chinese Ambassador to the United States urging his country to immediately issue visas to U.S. food inspectors.

"It is unacceptable that the Chinese government is blocking our food safety inspectors from entering their country and examining facilities that are suspected of providing contaminated pet food to American consumers," Durbin said.

"We have asked for two things in our letter today -- that the Chinese government allow our inspectors in and that the Chinese ambassador to the United States meet with Congresswoman DeLauro and me to discuss the larger issue of contaminated food being sent to the U.S. These are reasonable requests and we hope that we can find a level of cooperation with the Chinese."

Durbin and DeLauro learned about China's refusal to grant the food inspectors visas during a meeting Wednesday with FDA Commission, Andrew von Eschenbach. The Capitol Hill meeting focused on the latest pet food recall -- announced by Natural Balance earlier this week after the company learned some of its products contained rice protein tainted with the chemical melamine.

That chemical is used in plastics and fertilizers, but is not allowed in human or pet food, according to the FDA.

U.S. importer Wilbur-Ellis said it bought the rice protein concentrate from a Chinese company called Binzhou Futian Biology Technology, Ltd. That company's Web site says it processes a number of agricultural product and byproducts, including granule corn gluten meal, powdery corn gluten meal, and 30,000 metric tons of rice protein concentrate.

It also states its rice protein is "mainly used to feed the animals. The rice protein concentrate, which is the by-product of rice starch, is rich in nutrition. It plays an important part in helping animals grow and against illness. It is a good additive, so the animals can grow stronger and eat more."

Durbin: Safety First

Back on Capitol Hill, Durbin said the FDA has tried since April 4, 2007, to get its food inspectors into the Chinese facilities suspected of making the tainted products.

"At a time when China is exporting more foods into the U.S., the Chinese are refusing to allow our inspectors in to the country to investigate the source of the pet food contamination," DeLauro said. "The FDA needs to be allowed to investigate this so we can better protect our pets and identify the source of the source of the problem. While we have a significant trade relationship with the Chinese, the investigation of the contaminated product comes first."

The FDA says the Chinese company Xuzhou Anying Biologic Technology Development Co. Ltd., is the source of the melamine-tainted wheat gluten.

Menu Foods of Canada and other pet food makers have recalled 60 million containers of dog and cat food -- sold under nearly 100 brands -- that contain the tainted wheat gluten.

At least 16 pets have died -- and scores of others have suffered kidney disease -- after eating the contaminated pet food, the FDA says. The actual numbers, however, are likely much higher; anecdotal evidence suggests the numbers may be in the thousands.

Durbin and DeLauro said it is imperative that China allow U.S. food inspectors into the facilities suspected of making the melamine-tainted products.

"This incident has brought suffering to pet owners who have seen their animals fall prey to illness or death, and caused significant economic losses to U.S. companies that believed they were importing wholesome products," they wrote in their letter to the Chinese Ambassador to the United States. "Last year, the United States imported more than $2.1 billion of agricultural goods from China, up from nearly $1.8 billion the year before. Clearly, this is an important trading relationship."

Last week, Durbin and Senator Herb Kohl (D-WI) held a special hearing on the pet food recall. The hearing pitted FDA representatives and pet food lobbyists against the bipartisan Appropriations Subcommittee.

"Many cats, dogs and other pets, considered members of the family, are now suffering as a result of a deeply flawed pet food inspection system," Durbin said. "The FDA's response to this situation has been wholly inadequate -- we need to establish standardized inspections, impose penalties on companies who delay reporting health problems and increase communication between the FDA and the state inspectors so that we can catch problems more quickly. These sound like basic steps but the FDA has failed to put them in place."

After the hearing, Durbin told ConsumerAffairs.com that he is working on legislation to address this problem, but he did not specify the scope of his pending legislative action.

A North Carolina pet owner has one suggestion. She wants pet food manufacturers to be required to disclose the following information:

• The sources of their ingredients, including the country of origin;
• The names of the contract manufacturers for these companies;
• The names of the companies and countries they receive their products from.

"China is one of the most polluted and corrupt places in the world and the thought of any food products coming from there makes me want to gag," pet owner Aleda R. of Durham, N.C. told ConsumerAffairs.com. "There is no accountability."

This pet food debacle has struck a personal cord with Aleda.

"My dog has been eating IAMS dry food," she says. "She is a Chinese Crested, a small dog, who had a physical in October, with no problems. Because of the (pet food) scare, I just had her blood work (done) over again, and she has now experienced some 'off the chart on one of her kidney enzymes.'"

More about the Pet Food Recall ...



China Blocks U.S. Inspectors Seeking Answers to Pet Poisonings...

Article Image

Melamine Blamed for More Pet Food Recalls


The chemical melamine is again being blamed for causing kidney failure in cats and dogs.

Only this time, it's in the rice protein of Natural Balance's Venison and Brown Rice canned and bagged dog foods, Venison and Brown Rice dog treats, and Venison and Green Pea dry cat food.

"Recent laboratory results show that the products contain melamine," Natural Balance said in a press release posted on its Web site. "We believe the source of the melamine is a rice protein concentrate ... Natural Balance has confirmed this morning that some production batches of these products may contain melamine."

Melamine is a chemical used in plastics and fertilizers, but it is not allowed in human or pet food, according to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

The nearly 100 brands of pet food products recalled in the past month -- and blamed for kidney problems and deaths of scores of dogs and cats across the country -- contain melamine-tainted wheat gluten imported from China, the FDA says.

Natural Balance products, however, do not contain wheat gluten.

And that's why the company's recall caught pet owner and industry experts by surprise.

"This recall blows my mind," says Canadian author Ann N. Martin, who researched the pet food industry for years and wrote the books "Food Pets Die For: Shocking Facts About Pet Food," and "Protect Your Pets: More Shocking Facts."

Ann Martin's Books

"Prior to writing my last book (in 2003), Natural Balance was a company that was making its own food, using quality ingredients, and happy to answer any and all questions you had," Martin told ConsumerAffairs.com today.

"Now look what has happened. They grew and apparently the ingredients they are using are turning out to be the same as the inferior companies. I'm extremely upset, and needless to say, they will not be mentioned in the revisions to this book."

Menu Foods Expands Recall

Meanwhile, Menu Foods on Tuesday announced it's expanding its recall to include one additional product -- Natural Life Vegetarian pet food sold in 13.2 ounce cans. The recalled product has the date Nov/22/09 on the bottom of the cans and the UPC code 12344-07114.

The Canadian-based company said it recalled this pet food because: "Over the past several days, Menu Foods continued a detailed analysis of production records at its Emporia, Kansas, plant as part of the US Food and Drug Administration's ongoing investigation of this adulterated wheat gluten."

But how did adulterated, melamine-tainted, rice protein end up in Natural Balance's pet foods? This is a company known for using only human-grade ingredients in its products.

Natural Balance's Publicist Daniel Bernstein said the company started using the rice protein concentrate a month ago.

The company added the ingredient, he said, to increase the protein content of the food. It immediately discontinued using that ingredient after receiving calls about sick animals.

Bernstein said tests results have confirmed melamine in two of the four recalled products -- Venison and Brown Rice Dry Dog Formula and Venison and Green Pea Dry Cat Formula.

But the company recalled the other products -- Venison and Brown Rice Canned Dog Food and Venison & Brown Rice Formula Dog Treats -- because they also contain rice protein. "We have not found melamine in those products," Bernstein told ConsumerAffair.com today.

Finding melamine in any of the company's products came as a complete shock to Natural Balance, Bernstein said.

"For the past month, this has been about the wheat gluten in the pet foods," he said, referring to the nationwide recall of pet food announced in March. "This is brand new to everyone. No one saw this comingthis is shocking and upsetting."

Bernstein confirmed reports that a San Francisco-based company -- Wilbur-Ellis -- imported the rice protein concentrate from China.

That company then sold the ingredient to Diamond Pet Foods, which packs some of the Natural Balance products. Diamond Foods, however, told USA Today that it doesn't use rice protein in any of its foods.

Wilbur-Ellis also sold the rice protein concentrate to four other pet food makers, according to USA Today. The company would not disclose the names of those manufacturers, but said the other major pet food maker that received the ingredient -- besides Diamond Pet Foods -- tested the product and did not find any melamine.

Wilbur-Ellis also said it notified the FDA on Sunday that it had detected melamine in some rice protein concentrate imported from China about a week ago, according to USA Today.

The company said it has stopped importing the ingredient from that Chinese firm, Binzhou Futian Biology Technology.

When asked if Natural Balance will add rice protein to its pet foods in the future, Bernstein said: "It's not likely. But it if does, it's not going to use the same line of rice protein."

He added: "It's not an essential ingredient because until a month, it wasn't in any of the products."

Natural Balance's president told USA Today the company has received reports of about 10 sick pets -- mostly dogs -- since last Thursday.

The company says some pets developed kidney failure after eating its food. That's the same problem many of the pets who've eating the melamine-tainted wheat gluten have experienced.

"The first calls came in last Thursday and Friday," Bernstein said, adding they were from pet owners across the country. "By Friday, we had six calls and that's when we started testing (the food). And once we heard pets were getting sick, we contacted our distributors."

Bernstein said there are no reports of deaths in dogs or cats linked to the company's recalled foods.

Pet owners, he said, should immediately stop using the recalled foods. They should also have their pets seen by a veterinarian if they show any signs of kidney failure, including loss of appetite, lethargy and vomiting.

Bernstein said he did not know how many containers of pet food are included the recall, but added: "it's a relatively small number."

The recalled foods are packaged in bags, cans, and zip lock treat bags, and sold in pet specialty stores nationwide.

None of Natural Balance's other products contain rice protein, the company said. And none of its other products are involved in the recall. Natural Balance says it will continue to work closely with the FDA.

Pet owners with questions about the recall can contact the company at 1-800-829-4493.

In the meantime, author Ann Martin -- who used to recommend Natural Balance to pet owners -- doubts she'll ever buy the company's products again.

"I cook for my guys most of the time," she says, adding she fed her dog Natural Balance when she boarded him at a kennel. "(But) I'm almost afraid to try any foods now, even the quality ones, as they seem to have followed the lead of many of the multi-nationals and gone to the co-packers."

Cat owner Carolynne V. of Brick, N.J. echoes Martin's sentiments.

She says one of her cats recently developed kidney stones after eating Natural Balance's Venison and Green Pea food.

And she's angry the company didn't investigate its products after Menu Foods announced its recall in March.

"Until now, the Venison and Green Pea formulas had been the answer to my prayers in terms of feeding my allergic cats," she says. "But now I realize that I had only been putting my cats' health in jeopardy by feeding them (this) product. Our pets are loving family members and I cannot believe (the company's) irresponsibility in making health claims about (its) product that obviously are not true.

"This leads me to believe that despite all of (the company's) published claims, it is using inferior ingredients in its products and I have discontinued the use of all Natural Balance products."

More about the Pet Food Recall ...



Melamine Blamed for More Pet Food Recalls...

Article Image

Natural Balance Recalls Pet Food


Another pet food company has recalled some of its products after receiving complaints that dogs and cats are vomiting and experiencing kidney problems.

Natural Balance Pet Foods announced on its Web site that it is pulling all dates of Venison & Brown Rice Dry Dog Food and Venison & Green pea Dry Cat Food from the market.

"We do not know what it wrong with the food at this time," the California-based company states on its Web site, "but we have heard that animals are vomiting and experiencing kidney problems. Although the problems seem to be focused on one particular lot, as a precautionary measure, we are pulling all dates of Venison & Brown Rice Dry Dog Food and Venison & Green Pea Dry Cat Food from the shelves."

The message adds: "We are working closely with the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Please discontinue feeding all Venison and Brown Rice Dry Dog Food and Venison and Green Pea Dry Cat Food." The company said no other Natural Balance products are affected by the recall.

The FDA said that there is "no indication at this time whether this is related to the ongoing pet food recalls."

On the company's 800 number, a recorded message Monday night stated the only test results Natural Balance has received back are bacterial reports. And those tests did not reveal any abnormal findings.

Natural Balance's Web site said the affected brands of pet food contain no grains like wheat, barley, corn, and oats. And wheat gluten is not listed as an ingredient for either brand of Natural Balance's recalled pet foods.

The FDA says the nearly 100 brands of pet foods and treats involved in the nationwide recall -- announced on March 16, 2007, by Menu Foods of Canada -- were made with melamine-tainted wheat gluten imported from China. Melamine is a fertilizer and a chemical commonly used in plastics.

Expert Calls It "Very Upsetting"

Ann Martin's Books

Canadian author Ann N. Martin, who researched the pet food industry for five years, called Natural Balance's recall "very upsetting."

In earlier interviews with ConsumerAffairs.com, Martin said Natural Balance is one of the few pet foods on the market made with "human grade" ingredients.

"These are ingredients that have been inspected and passed for human consumption," says Martin, author of "Food Pets Die For ... Shocking Facts About Pet Food," and "Protect Your Pets ... More Shocking Facts." Martin says she feeds her dog Natural Balance Premium food when she boards him at the kennel.

When ConsumerAffairs.com contacted Martin late Monday night about Natural Balance's recall, she said: "I had heard about this yesterday morning and can't figure out what the heck is going on. If there is something wrong with this food, and it is one of the top foods on the market, I will just forget telling people what foods they should feed their pets. This is very upsetting. "

Pet owners can call Natural Balance's toll-free number at 800-829-4493 or visit its Web site for more information.

South Africa

In related news, the pet food recall has now spread to South Africa.

Royal Canin South Africa, which manufacturers Royal Canin premium dog and cat food -- and the cheaper brand Vets Choice -- announced that it was recalling the products because they'd caused kidney failure in dogs and cats, according to reports in The Namibian, an independent daily newspaper published in Windhoek, and allAfrica.com.

Royal Canin South Africa advised veterinarians in South Africa and Namibia to stop selling Vets Choice until further notice.

The paper said laboratory tests are being done to determine if the food is contaminated.

Nineteen dogs in Cape Town and Johannesburg -- that ate Vets Choice food -- have been diagnosed with acute kidney failure, according to News 24, South Africa's premier news source.

A statement sent to veterinary surgeons in South Africa said: "In the interests of patients and pending tests being conducted on Vets Choice products, Royal Canin South Africa has decided to suspend all sales of Vets Choice with immediate effect and vets are requested to advise clients to cease feeding Vets Choice products to their pets until further notice."

The South African subsidiary of Hill's Pet Nutrition previously recalled a batch of its Prescription Diet m/d Feline dry food in the wake of the massive recall in the United States. The prescribed cat food is only available from veterinarians.

The South African Veterinary Association called Hills' recall "a precautionary measure" and said it hadn't appeared to affect cats in South Africa, The Namibian reported.

Dr Guy Fyvie, spokesperson for Hill's in South Africa, told News 24, the potentially affected products had never been released from the warehouse to South African veterinarians and all food sold in that country is safe.

This isn't the first time South African pet owners have worried about the food they're feeding their dogs and cats.

Earlier this year, approximately 35 dogs in that country died after eating toxic pet food. In that case, the pets died from ethylene glycol-contaminated food -- manufactured by Aquanutro -- and sold at Woolworths in South Africa.

Finger-Pointing Begins

The United States company that imported the tainted wheat gluten -- ChemNutra of Las Vegas, Nevada -- says it was victimized by its Chinese supplier, XuZhou Anying Biologic Technology Development Co. Ltd.

In a letter posted on the company's Web site, CEO Steve Miller also said he is "appalled" that Menu Foods took so long to recall the contaminated pet food.

"The possibility that any animal fell ill or died because of an ingredient we may have supplied to Menu Foods saddens us and also angers us because it means that ChemNutra has been victimized as well, by our own supplier," Miller wrote, adding his company will no longer do business with XuZhou Anying.

"We are concerned that we may have been the victim of deliberate and mercenary contamination for the purpose of making the wheat gluten we purchased appear to have a higher protein content than it did, because melamine causes a false high result on protein tests," Miller said.

Miller was referring to allegations that the melamine could have intentionally been added to the wheat gluten -- a theory raised earlier this month by the director of the FDA's Center for Veterinary Medicine.

"Somebody may have added melamine to the wheat gluten in order to increase what appears to be the protein level," the FDA's Stephen Sundlof said. "Wheat gluten is a high-protein substance and by trying to artificially inflate the protein level, it could command a higher price. But that's just one theory at this point."

Miller said his company had never heard of melamine before this recall.

"We had no idea that melamine was an issue until being notified by the FDA on March 29," he wrote on the company's Web site. "It's simply not a chemical even on the radar screen for food ingredient suppliers."

Miller also said his company is "distressed" with Menu Foods' handling of the pet food recall.

"We are appalled and distressed that Menu Foods took so long to recall its products, although it clearly suspected there was a problem for weeks prior to the first recall," he wrote. "And it wasn't until eight days before they issued their first recall that Menu Foods told us that wheat gluten was one of many ingredients it was investigating."

Questions Raised about ChemNutra

Questions, however, have surfaced in recent weeks about ChemNutra and its ties to China. The Canadian investigative newspaper, Canada Free Press, describes the company's Chinese headquarters as a "rundown warehouse in rural China."

That warehouse, the paper adds, is located within 50 miles of XuZhou Anying, the company blamed for supplying the tainted wheat gluten.

The Las Vegas Review Journal says ChemNutra's Las Vegas office -- at Durango and Charleston Streets -- is "very small ... without even a sign on the door."

ChemNutra touts its ties to China, stating it "imports high-quality nutritional and pharmaceutical chemicals from China to the US. We purchase our inventory from quality-assured manufacturers in China; most of whom we have strong relationships over the past twelve years."

The company's president, Sally Miller, also has strong ties to China.

ChemNutra's Web site states she has "more than 12 years experience in China as QA Manager and Purchasing Manager ... and was responsible for purchasing large quantities of nutritional and food ingredients in China for export worldwide."

The Web site also states Sally Miller has an MBA -- and an Engineering degree -- in Food Engineering, but doesn't state where she earned those degrees. Canada Free Press learned she "earned an MBA from City University in Seattle, as well as (an) Engineering degree in Food Chemical Engineering at Hanzhou Institute of Commerce in Hanzhou, China."

More about the Pet Food Recall ...



Natural Balance Recalls Pet Food...

Pet Food Importer Blames Its Chinese Supplier

By Lisa Wade McCormick
ConsumerAffairs.com

April 16, 2007
The United States company that imported the tainted wheat gluten -- ChemNutra of Las Vegas, Nevada -- says it was victimized by its Chinese supplier, XuZhou Anying Biologic Technology Development Co. Ltd.

In a letter posted on the company's Web site, CEO Steve Miller also said he is "appalled" that Menu Foods took so long to recall the contaminated pet food.

"The possibility that any animal fell ill or died because of an ingredient we may have supplied to Menu Foods saddens us and also angers us because it means that ChemNutra has been victimized as well, by our own supplier," Miller wrote, adding his company will no longer do business with XuZhou Anying.

"We are concerned that we may have been the victim of deliberate and mercenary contamination for the purpose of making the wheat gluten we purchased appear to have a higher protein content than it did, because melamine causes a false high result on protein tests," Miller said.

Miller was referring to allegations that the melamine could have intentionally been added to the wheat gluten -- a theory raised earlier this month by the director of the FDA's Center for Veterinary Medicine.

"Somebody may have added melamine to the wheat gluten in order to increase what appears to be the protein level," the FDA's Stephen Sundlof said. "Wheat gluten is a high-protein substance and by trying to artificially inflate the protein level, it could command a higher price. But that's just one theory at this point."

Miller said his company had never heard of melamine before this recall.

"We had no idea that melamine was an issue until being notified by the FDA on March 29," he wrote on the company's Web site. "It's simply not a chemical even on the radar screen for food ingredient suppliers."

Miller also said his company is "distressed" with Menu Foods' handling of the pet food recall.

"We are appalled and distressed that Menu Foods took so long to recall its products, although it clearly suspected there was a problem for weeks prior to the first recall," he wrote. "And it wasn't until eight days before they issued their first recall that Menu Foods told us that wheat gluten was one of many ingredients it was investigating."

Questions Raised about ChemNutra

Questions, however, have surfaced in recent weeks about ChemNutra and its ties to China. The Canadian investigative newspaper, Canada Free Press, describes the company's Chinese headquarters as a "rundown warehouse in rural China."

That warehouse, the paper adds, is located within 50 miles of XuZhou Anying, the company blamed for supplying the tainted wheat gluten.

The Las Vegas Review Journal says ChemNutra's Las Vegas office -- at Durango and Charleston Streets -- is "very small ... without even a sign on the door."

ChemNutra touts its ties to China, stating it "imports high-quality nutritional and pharmaceutical chemicals from China to the US. We purchase our inventory from quality-assured manufacturers in China; most of whom we have strong relationships over the past twelve years."

The company's president, Sally Miller, also has strong ties to China.

ChemNutra's Web site states she has "more than 12 years experience in China as QA Manager and Purchasing Manager ... and was responsible for purchasing large quantities of nutritional and food ingredients in China for export worldwide."

The Web site also states Sally Miller has an MBA -- and an Engineering degree -- in Food Engineering, but doesn't state where she earned those degrees. Canada Free Press learned she "earned an MBA from City University in Seattle, as well as (an) Engineering degree in Food Chemical Engineering at Hanzhou Institute of Commerce in Hanzhou, China."

Puerto Rico Outbreak

The pet food crisis -- blamed for the deaths and illnesses of thousands of dogs and cats in the United States -- has spread to Puerto Rico.

Two dogs on that Caribbean island died of kidney failure last week after eating melamine-tainted Ol'Roy dog biscuits, according to Puerto Rico's Veterinary Medical Association.

The dogs -- both three-year-old miniature schnauzers -- are the first pets in Puerto Rico to die from the contaminated pet food products, said Dr. Victor Callazo, president Puerto Rico's Veterinary Medical Association. His association ran tests that confirmed the wheat gluten in the dog biscuits contained melamine, a chemical commonly used in plastics.

Dr. Callazo said the tainted dog biscuits were purchased at Amigo, a supermarket chain owned by the Bentonville, Arkansas-based Wal-Mart Stores.

The Food and Drug Administration has confirmed 16 deaths from the tainted pet food, but other organizations say the real number is in the thousands.

Recall Announced One Month Ago

It was one month ago that Menu Foods of Canada announced its massive recall of pet food, one of the largest in history. Nearly 100 brands of pet food and treats -- and more than 60 million containers -- are included in the recall.

The FDA says the pet food and products were made with melamine-tainted wheat gluten imported from China.

Outraged Pet Owners

Meanwhile, ConsumerAffairs.com continues to hear from grieving and worried pet owners. Many wonder why Iams has not recalled its dry food.

They're pet owners like Judith E. of Hamilton, MA.

"My perfectly healthy Cairn terrier died of acute renal failure due to poisoning," she says. "She was always by my side and ate only Iams dry dog food. There are several complaints about this food. We want this food recalled ASAP."

A California pet owner also blames her dog's recent death on Iams dry food.

"My dog was 15, but was very active and spunky," says Angela of Alamo, California. "He was fed Iams dry dog food and became very ill, very quickly. I did not feed him the wet dog food, but he still was lethargic, lost weight rapidly, was vomiting, urinating in the house, and could not walkby the time I got him to the vet he had sores in his mouth and was in acute renal failure."

Angela says she had to put her beloved dog to sleep.

"It was horrible. I am still so upset and confused and saddened by his loss. I don't understand what happenedthis renal failure took him by surprise and was so devastating. He could not even lift his head when he was being taken to the vet."

P&G Pet Care, the manufacturer of Iams, says on its Web site that none of its dry pet foods are included in the recall. The company also said all the dry and wet pet foods it continues to sell do not contain wheat gluten from any supplier.

Menu Foods Not Responding To Calls

Another pet owner says Menu Foods has not responded to the repeated messages she's left about her dog's death. Jerri L. of Goodyear, Arizona, told ConsumerAffairs.com that she's called the company's pet food recall hotline five times since March.

But no one has returned any of her messages.

"I understand that they may be swamped with calls, but after all the messages I've left, I would hope that someone would call," she says. "As of this date (April 16, 2007), I haven't heard a word from anyone. I'm extremely disappointed in their handling of this situation."

Jerri says her 13-year-old Sheltie, Sandy Boy, became ill and suddenly died after eating Nutra Max, one of the foods included in the recall. Sandy Boy, she says, was in perfect health before she fed him that brand of wet food.

"And then boom, suddenly he was gone," Jerri says, adding Sandy Boy died last Memorial Day, but had symptoms that mirror those in dogs and cats who have become sick or died after eating Menu's tainted food. "Three days after he started eating that food, he was in complete kidney failure. We had to make the difficult choice to put him down."

She adds: "It kind of makes me sick to think that I killed my dog. I could barely live with the decision to put him down and now to think that I may have killed him inadvertently."

Jerri is convinced Menu Foods knew its products were contaminated months before its March 16, 2007, recall.

"I know how large corporations work and how they hide problems with products until they're forced to go public," she says. "I want the truth. I think they knew about this thing a long time before it was made public. It's too coincidental that my dog passed away from the same symptoms that dogs are having now. We had just switched dog foods and none of my other dogs (that didn't eat Nutra Max) got sick."

Jerri is also outraged that Menu Food's hasn't responded to her repeated calls.

"One lady hung up on me when I questioned her about why I was not getting any calls back.

"Menu Foods needs to train its people how to handle calls like this," she adds. "These are from people with sick pets or people who've lost a pet. I'm just heartsick over this whole thing."

Menu Foods spokeswoman Sarah Tuite says the company has hired an outside firm to respond pet owners calls. The company's hotline, she says, has received more than 300,000 calls since it announced its massive recall.

"We're asking people to be patient," Tuite told us earlier this month. "We've engaged a third-party that will be calling everyone back."

Tuite also denied Jerri's suggestion that Menu Foods knew its products were tainted months ago.

"We are completely confident the problem is related to an ingredient (wheat gluten) that was introduced by a new supplier ... and we've stopped using that supplier."

More about the Pet Food Recall ...



Pet Food Importer Blames Its Chinese Supplier...

Pet Owners Organize to Put Congress on a Short Leash


The facts are simple. In March Canadian pet food manufacturer Menu Foods announced that a contaminated ingredient in some of its dog and cat food made the products potentially lethal to their intended customers. A recall of several brands began.

But the consequences of this incident are far from simple. For thousands of pet owners, they're intensely personal. Because of that contamination, and the lag time before the tainted products were removed from shore shelves, a beloved member of the family is dead or seriously injured.

"We lost our three-year-old cat, Timber on Nov 17, 2006 due to liver failure," said Jen Hoeflein, of Bastrop, Texas. "He was consuming Hill Country Fare's canned cat food on a regular basis. He rapidly became ill and in horror, our family watched him slip into a near-death stage. As soon as the vet's office opened the next morning, he was put to sleep to end his suffering."

Hoeflein responded by forming a group called Pets Need a Voice Too, or PNV2. She says she was determined that the tragedy that befell her family would go no further. She led efforts to organize a nationwide memorial march for April 28, to memorialize pets who died and to call attention to what she sees as an outrageous situation.

"It's a complete outrage that Timber's suffering was mirrored all over the country, different animals, different families with the outcome the same. And still, the tainted food sat on the store shelves. In fact, some of it is still there. That's simply appalling," she told ConsumerAffairs.com.

Hoeflein describes her group, PNV2, as being in its infant stage, but representing a collective group of average citizens directly affected by the tainted pet food event either through the loss of a beloved pet, the illness of a pet or the overall concern for the quality of products purchased with a blinding degree of faith by consumers. But make no mistake, she intends to bring about some changes.

"I think Americans have forgotten how powerful their individual voices are when it comes to protecting their families and in many American households, pets are considered members of their families," Hoeflein said. "This event has created a passion-driven response, an outcry for accountability and the demand for the meeting of product quality standards."

After her pet's death, Hoeflein said she began working the Internet, networking with others who had similar experiences. As people began sharing their frustration and pain, suggestions of a day of tribute began to surface, she says.

"It just snowballed after that. I made a modest free website that soon became overwhelmed with traffic as word of the Memorial March spread," Hoeflein said. "We made the investment to purchase a website simply because people were coming to us for information and updates on what quickly had become a large movement on the part of citizens in response to the their personal losses."

The April 28 march will take place in Boston; Reno, Nevada; San Diego; Orange County, California; Uniontown, Pennsylvania; Portland, Maine; and Jacksonville, Oregon, with efforts pending in dozens of other cities.

"The March is a direct response from people all over the country and Canada who felt an overwhelming need to speak in outrage over the lack of safety standards in regard to pet food and the corporate negligence in allowing the food to remain on the shelves prior to the recall," Hoeflein said.

The March is just the first step in what Hoeflein and other pet owners and activists hope will be a campaign to ensure protection of pets. The long-range objective is a network of committed pet owners who will keep pressure on lawmakers and government agencies to make sure tainted ingredients never again make their way into the food supply.

"We want people to understand, we are simply giving a voice to sadness and pain, to frustration and outrage," Hoeflein said. "People need that and our pets deserve that. Hopefully, that voice will result in better days for pets and owners alike."

Thousands of Deaths

ConsumerAffairs.com has talked to scores of grieving pet owners and received hundreds of written complaints. The Web site Petconnection.com, says it's received 4,069 reports of deceased pets in the wake of the recall. Of that number, 2,099 are cats and 1,970 are dogs.

The Web site also says it's received 12,663 reports of illnesses linked to the recalled pet food, which the FDA says is contaminated with melamine-tainted wheat gluten.

"These are self-reported numbers, and should be in no way be considered confirmed or 'official,'" the Web site states. "But if even a fraction can be confirmed, they show deaths far exceeding the FDA's count of 16 pets, most of whom died in a manufacturers feeding trial."

Last week, Sen. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) chaired a special Senate hearing about the pet food recall debacle, hearing mostly from FDA representatives and pet food lobbyists, while the FDA warned that some recalled pet food may

still be on store shelves and warned retailers and pet owners to be careful.

"Many cats, dogs and other pets, considered members of the family, are now suffering as a result of a deeply flawed pet food inspection system," Durbin said during Thursday's hearing. "The FDA's response to this situation has been wholly inadequate -- we need to establish standardized inspections, impose penalties on companies who delay reporting health problems and increase communication between the FDA and the state inspectors so that we can catch problems more quickly. These sound like basic steps but the FDA has failed to put them in place."

Durbin's remarks highlighted the many flaws in the pet food industry's patchwork inspection system, which is not all that different from the haphazard, industry-dominated, system that supposedly protects humans.

FDA Inspections

To begin with, the FDA has only inspected about 30 percent of all pet food plants since 2004, said Stephen Sundlof, director of the agency's Center for Veterinary Medicine. He said many of those visits occurred after recalls had been put in place or during the Mad Cow scare.

The FDA had never inspected the Menu Foods facility in Emporia, Kan., where many of the recalled products were made, until after the company reported a problem.

Eric Nelson, president of the American Association of Feed Control Officers (AAFCO), said few inspections are required because the industry, with help from the AAFCO, regulates itself well.

After the lengthy hearing, Senator Durbin told ConsumerAffairs.com he is working on legislation that will address these problems, but he did not specify the scope of his pending legislation.

Industry Response

In related news, The Pet Food Institute (PFI), which represents pet food manufacturers, announced Thursday the formation of the National Pet Food Commission to strengthen industry procedures and safeguards.

The commission includes nationally-recognized veterinarians, toxicologists, state and federal regulators and nutritionists, and will have two main goals:

• To investigate the cause of the current pet food recall;

• To recommend steps the industry and government should take to build on safety and quality standards already in place.

The commission will report its findings and offer recommendations to the industry and regulators at the end of its investigation. PFI President Duane Ekedahl said the commission will "augment the FDA's work and make recommendations so that consumers continue to be confident in the food they feed their pets."

"The people who make pet food are pet lovers and owners themselves. They understand the concerns consumers have about pet food products and feel a special responsibility to address this issue," he said.

Dr. Angele Thompson -- an expert in nutritional biochemistry and a member of the American Academy of Veterinary Nutrition -- will chair the commission.

"It is imperative that we study this problem from all sides and apply lessons learned to further build on industry procedures and safeguards," she said.

In other news, the Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians--in consultation with the FDA--is trying to compile specific data on the number of cats and dogs that have died after eating the melamine-tainted wheat gluten.

The AAVLD Veterinary Analytical Toxicology Committee launched a survey on April 6, to gather data on cases that meet certain criteria for possible pet food-induced nephrotoxicosis.

These cases should meet two of the following criteria:

(1) known exposure to one of the recalled pet foods,
(2) histologic lesions consistent with crystal-induced tubular nephrosis (pictures are posted on the AAVLD Web site),
(3) urinalysis with crystals (also posted on the site), and
(4) chemical confirmation of the presence of melamine or other marker chemicals in pet food, tissues, or urine.

The organization is asking AAVLD laboratories, along with other laboratories and private practitioners who wish to participate, to report incidents in the United States and Canada, using the survey tool on its Web site: www.aavld.org. Nonmembers can enter case data via the public area by clicking on News and then on AAVLD Pet Food Toxicity Survey.

The data will be available to the FDA for its investigations.

More about the Pet Food Recall ...



Pet Owners Organize to Put Congress on a Short Leash...

Article Image

Senate Hears from Pet Food Lobbyists, FDA Officials, Promises Action

By Joseph S. Enoch and Lisa Wade McCormick
ConsumerAffairs.com

April 12, 2007
Senators today heard from industry lobbyists and government bureaucrats at a hearing into the nationwide pet food poisonings, but unrepresented were the thousands of consumers who have lost their pets.


Two of Peggy G's dogs
Not invited to testify was Peggy G., a grieving dog owner from Jacksonville, Arkansas. Had she been on Capitol Hill, she would have told the assembled politicians, bureaucrats and assorted apologists how the food she fed three of her dogs led to their untimely deaths on Easter Sunday.

Sen. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) chaired the hearing which pitted Food and Drug Administration (FDA) representatives and pet food lobbyists against the bipartisan Appropriations Subcommittee. Earlier in the day, the FDA warned that some recalled pet food may still be on store shelves and warned retailers and pet owners to be careful.

"Many cats, dogs and other pets, considered members of the family, are now suffering as a result of a deeply flawed pet food inspection system," Durbin said. "The FDA's response to this situation has been wholly inadequate -- we need to establish standardized inspections, impose penalties on companies who delay reporting health problems and increase communication between the FDA and the state inspectors so that we can catch problems more quickly. These sound like basic steps but the FDA has failed to put them in place."

Durbin's remarks highlighted the many flaws in the pet food industry's patchwork inspection system, which is not all that different from the haphazard, industry-dominated, system that supposedly protects humans.

To begin with, the FDA has only inspected about 30 percent of all pet food plants since 2004, said Stephen Sundlof, director of the agency's Center for Veterinary Medicine. He said many of those visits occurred after recalls had been put in place or during the Mad Cow scare.

The FDA had never inspected the Menu Foods facility in Emporia, Kan., where many of the recalled products had been made, until after Menu Foods reported a problem.

Eric Nelson, president of the American Association of Feed Control Officers (AAFCO), said that few inspections are required because the industry, with help from the AAFCO, regulates itself well.

The AAFCO is a voluntary trade group that puts its logo and quality assurance on pet food products that pay to be a member of the organization. However, further questioning by Durbin revealed that the AAFCO only has one full-time employee, does no inspections and makes no promises as to the quality of the products is endorses.

Reporting Delays

Another issue was Menu Foods' delay in reporting.

Durbin said Menu Foods first noticed a potential problem on February 20, 2007 but did not contact the FDA until March 15.

Sundlof, who gruffly refused to speak with ConsumerAffairs.com following his testimony, said that there is no means in place to punish Menu Foods for delaying almost a month in reporting the problem.

Durbin also expressed concern about the FDA's incomplete data. Durbin said websites and blogs have provided better information to consumers than the FDA.

The FDA's website currently has no succinct list of all the pet foods and treats recalled. Instead, there's a list of press releases which one must click through to find out what products are safe. The FDA's website also tends to coincide with the agency's conflicting reports on what is the actual cause of the thousands of animals' falling ill.

"As of Monday, a page titled 'FDA Update and Synopsis' stated that 'All the contaminated wheat gluten has been traced,'" Sen. Herb Kohl, (D-Wisc.) said. "But a few clicks away in a Frequently Asked Questions section, the FDA states, 'We are still tracing the contaminated wheat gluten.'"

"Obviously pet owners can get two very different ideas, depending on where they click," Kohl continued.

Sundlof promised Durbin the website's issues would be addressed but a few hours after the hearing, there was still no list of recalled products and the discrepancy Kohl noted still exists.

A Government Accountability Office report released in February highlighted the nation's "flawed" food inspection patchwork. That report found 15 agencies share food inspection responsibilities and that often some inspections overlap while other foods are hardly inspected at all.

Since that report's release, many Congressmen have vowed to fix the problem, probably by giving all food inspection jurisdiction to one agency. No legislation has been introduced yet.

Durbin told ConsumerAffairs.com he is working on legislation that will address the problem but did not specify how broad the scope of his pending legislation will be.

Consumers Speak

Peggy G. of Arkansas would have told Congress that her dogs -- Spicy, Zorro, and Roxie -- were treasured members of her family, just like her children. And she'd have asked them to pass laws that ensure the food she and other pets owners feed their dogs and cats is safe.

"If people care enough to pass laws that prevent cruelty to animals, why don't they care enough to pass legislation to make sure pet food is safe?" asks Peggy G. of Jacksonville, Arkansas. "I would like to see Congress pass laws that require the inspection process for pet food manufacturers be equivalent to the process that plants that make human food go through."

Peggy would also have told members of the Senate sub-committee that the recall isn't broad enough -- and should include more brands of pet foods.

Specifically, Ol' Roy dry food. That's the brand Peggy fed her dogs. The one she says made her dogs sick and caused them to die.

But it's not included in the nationwide recall of nearly 100 brands of pet food.

"Congress needs to know that it's not just the brands of pet food on the recall list that are affected," she says. "There are probably a whole lot more out there.

"I know it was the food that killed my dogs. It's the only thing they ate."

Peggy says the dogs were healthy and active when she and her family left their home on Easter morning.

"They had just eaten some of the Ol'Roy," she recalls. "We were gone for about five or six hours and when we got back, one of the dogs -- our Chihuahua-mix, Roxie -- was dead in the backyard. And two of our other dogs were very sick. They were vomiting, had diarrhea, and were lethargic."

Peggy says she tried to find a local veterinarian willing to examine her dogs -- on a payment plan.

"We'd spent so much money on bills, rent, and utilities that my husband's paycheck would not pay for the vet bills upfront," she says. "But none of our local vets would see them without payment that day.

"We finally found a vet in Tulsa -- some 300 miles away -- who would take them on a payment plan." Peggy says their St. Bernard-mix, Spicy, died on their way to Tulsa.

"We hadn't been in the car an hour," she says. "When we stopped for gas, a man saw us and asked what's wrong with the dogs. We told him, and he offered to take Zorro, our Shepherd-mix, to his vet who was much closer. But Zorro didn't even make it to that vet. He died on the way.

"I wish I had the money to test the dogs' bodies to see why they died," she adds. "But I believe it was the food that killed them."

Dry Food Blamed

Susan S. of Gainesville, Georgia, is also convinced the Purina dry food she fed her 16 dogs contributed to their illnesses. And to the death of her Great Pyrenees, who suddenly died last month.

"When I returned home from work, I found Sampson, my Great Pyrenees, dead," she says. "This was a two-year-old, healthy dog. I checked his gums and eyelids and they were healthy in appearance. But he had been lethargic after eating the Purina food.

"Several of my other dogs then began to vomit, have diarrhea, and they would not eat their food, which was very unlike them."

Susan says the dogs had eaten Purina dry food -- which in not included in the massive recall of 60 million containers of pet food -- for years. And they'd never had any problems until last month.

"So it has to be something that's in the food now," says Susan, who holds a master's degree in entomology. "Something in that food changed because they'd eat it before. And all 16 refused to eat the food."

Susan says she tried to mix in table food with the dry food -- hoping they'd eat something.

"But the dogs picked out the table food and left the dry food. They are still rejecting the dry food, which is unlike them because they always cleaned their bowls. I think they know something is wrong with the food."

When asked what she'd say to members of the pet food industry attending today's hearing on the recall, Susan replies: "I would ask them to make an affordable, nutritious pet food that I could have confidence in and could feed to my animals. At this point, I'm not confident with the pet food that's out there now."

Susan would also ask them why it's taken so long to identify the problem with the pet food -- a problem the Food and Drug Administration blames on melamine-tainted wheat gluten.

"I have a background in science and it offends me that it took this long to identify the problem. And there are still a lot of unanswered questions."

She adds: "What I'm saying is 'why are we tolerating this kind of contaminants in the food without having them identified?' If I was going to make chicken food to give to chickens that would be used in human food, I would want to be sure that there's nothing in the (chicken feed) that is detrimental to humans. If you have a substance that's causing (these problems), why not eliminate it from the food? How can you responsibly sell that product to the public? That's my problem."

Are more stringent regulations for the pet food industry the answer?

"I think there needs to be a consistent set of laws," Susan says. "Whether they are federal, state, or local laws, there needs to be some kind of accountability and consistency so that whatever happens in Kansas at one plant is consistent with what happens at the plant in New Jersey."

Menu Foods, which announced its recall on March 16, 2007, has production plants in Emporia, Kansas, and Pennsauken, New Jersey.

In the meantime, Susan tried her dogs on a new brand of food today -- one her local animal control officer recommended.

Some of the dogs tried it, she says. But others walked away from it.

"If they won't eat this, I'm going to give them rice and boil it with barley and chicken broth. Financially this will be extremely difficult for me, but I will not let my dogs continue to suffer and die."

More about the Pet Food Recall ...



Senate Hears from Pet Food Lobbyists, FDA Officials, Promises Action...

FDA Warns That Recalled Pet Food May Still Be On Shelves


The FDA is advising pet owners that recalled pet food may still be on the shelves in some stores. The agency is urging retailers across the country to be vigilant in removing all products associated with the pet food recall, which began on March 16, 2007.

To verify the effectiveness of the recall, FDA has conducted approximately 400 checks of retail stores across the country. Based on the checks, FDA believes most companies have removed the recalled product; however, some have not. FDA said it will continue to monitor retailers' efforts to remove these items from the shelves.

"FDA's priority is to make sure that cats and dogs have safe food to eat," said Stephen Sundlof, D.V.M., director of FDA's Center for Veterinary Medicine. "Many of us are pet owners and animal lovers, and we want pet owners to feel assured that we are doing everything we can to make sure that all contaminated food is off the shelves."

Yesterday, Menu Foods and Nutro Products expanded their recalls of pet food.

Menu said its latest recall was prompted by reports from the US Food and Drug Administration about the presence of melamine in cans of cuts and gravy pet food produced in Menu Foods' Canadian production facility, Menu Foods said it undertook an accounting of all recalled wheat gluten supplied by ChemNutra Inc. to Menu Foods in the United States.

As the result of that review, Menu Foods said it has identified a single interplant transfer of the ChemNutra supplied wheat gluten, shipped from Menu Foods' plant in Emporia, Kansas, to its plant in Streetsville, Ontario. The wheat gluten was subsequently used in the production of pet food in December, 2006 and January, 2007, which is being recalled by Menu Foods.

The new varieties in the United States and Canada have been added to the recall list. The latest recall group is listed below, and a complete list of recalled products, including the new items can be reviewed at www.menufoods.com.

Nutro Products said it's ordering all its wet pet food product made with wheat gluten removed from store shelves -- regardless of production dates.

"Pet owners are fed up with confusing information regarding the Menu Foods recall," Dave Kravis, President and CEO of Nutro Products, stated in press release. "I had previously ordered a broader recall of affected products than what Menu Foods had suggested. Given this new information from Menu Foods, I have ordered all wet pet food products containing wheat gluten to be removed from store shelves. Our dry pet food is not made by Menu and remains unaffected by the recall."

Kravis said his company has also suspended all shipments to retail stores of Nutro's wet canned and pouch products that contain wheat gluten it's able to confirm their safety. He asked customers with the following Nutro wet pet food products (which are made by Menu Foods and contain wheat gluten) regardless of "best by date," to immediately stop feeding the products to their pets:

  • All Cat Pouch Food Products
  • Listed Cat 3.0 oz can products
  • All Dog Pouch Food Products
  • Listed Dog 12.5 oz Canned Products

Kravis said Menu Foods' recall does not include Nutro's dry pet food. Nutro's dry pet foods are not produced by that Canadian company and do not contain wheat gluten. Nutro's dry pet foods, biscuits and treats, are not involved in the recall and remain safe for pets to eat, Kravis said.

Menu Foods, he added, only manufactures wet, canned and pouch products for Nutro.

Menu Foods Update

Brand Look For This Date On The Bottom of Can or Back of Pouch Variety Description Can / Pouch UPC
Americas Choice, Preferred Pet Jan/2/10 Flaked Tuna 3oz Can 54807-59114
Your Pet Dec/19/09 Sliced Beef/Gravy 3oz Can 72036-29026
Nov/06/09 Sliced Variety Pack 3oz Can 72036-40013
Pet Pride Dec/19/09 Sliced Beef/Gravy 3oz Can 11110-86264
Nov 06 09 Sliced Variety Pack 3oz Can 11110-86003
Laura Lynn Jan/2/10 Flaked Tuna 3oz Can 86854-02407
Dec/19/09 Sliced Beef/Gravy 3oz Can 86854-02406
Nutriplan Dec/19/09 Sliced Beef/Gravy 3oz Can 41130-06755
Price Chopper Dec/19/09 Sliced Beef/Gravy 3oz Can 41735-12828
Publix Jan/2/10 Flaked Tuna 3oz Can 41415-08327
Dec/19/09 Sliced Beef/Gravy 3oz Can 41415-08827
Stop & Shop Companion Jan/2/10 Flaked Tuna 3oz Can 88267-00286
Winn Dixie Dec/19/09 Sliced Beef/Gravy 3oz Can 21140-19419
J.E. Mondou Jan/2/10 Flaked Tuna 85g Can 71127-54202
Medi-Cal Jan/8/09 Dissolution Formula 170g Can 70705-21280
Nutro Products All Dates Chicken Cacciatore 3oz Can 79105-35205
All Dates Orleans Seafood Jambalaya 3oz Can 79105-35206
All Dates Beef Ragout 3oz Can 79105-35207
All Dates Alaskan Halibut/Rice 3oz Can 79105-35221
All Dates Kitten Chicken/Lamb 3oz Can 79105-35202
All Dates California Chicken 3oz Can 79105-30011
All Dates Lamb/Turkey Cutlets 3oz Can 79105-30014
All Dates Salmon/Whitefish 3oz Can 79105-30013
All Dates Beef/Egg 3oz Can 79105-30015
All Dates Turkey/Chicken Liver 3oz Can 79105-30016
All Dates Seafood/Tomato/Bisque 3oz Can 79105-30017
All Dates Hunters Stew with Duck 3oz Can 79105-30018
All Dates Hunters Stew with Venison 3oz Can 79105-30019


FDA Warns That Recalled Pet Food May Still Be On Shelves...

Menu Foods Recalls More Cat Food Made With ChemNutra Wheat Gluten; Nutro Products Recalls All Wet Pet Foods Regardless of Date

April 11, 2007
Menu Foods and Nutro Products have expanded their recalls of pet food.

Menu said its latest recall was prompted by reports from the US Food and Drug Administration about the presence of melamine in cans of cuts and gravy pet food produced in Menu Foods' Canadian production facility, Menu Foods said it undertook an accounting of all recalled wheat gluten supplied by ChemNutra Inc. to Menu Foods in the United States.

As the result of that review, Menu Foods said it has identified a single interplant transfer of the ChemNutra supplied wheat gluten, shipped from Menu Foods' plant in Emporia, Kansas, to its plant in Streetsville, Ontario. This wheat gluten was subsequently used in the production of pet food in December, 2006 and January, 2007, which is being recalled by Menu Foods.

The new varieties in the United States and Canada have been added to the recall list. The latest recall group is listed below, and a complete list of recalled products, including the new items can be reviewed at www.menufoods.com.

Nutro Products said it's ordering all its wet pet food product made with wheat gluten removed from store shelves -- regardless of production dates.

"Pet owners are fed up with confusing information regarding the Menu Foods recall," Dave Kravis, President and CEO of Nutro Products, stated in press release. "I had previously ordered a broader recall of affected products than what Menu Foods had suggested. Given this new information from Menu Foods, I have ordered all wet pet food products containing wheat gluten to be removed from store shelves. Our dry pet food is not made by Menu and remains unaffected by the recall."

Kravis said his company has also suspended all shipments to retail stores of Nutro's wet canned and pouch products that contain wheat gluten it's able to confirm their safety. He asked customers with the following Nutro wet pet food products (which are made by Menu Foods and contain wheat gluten) regardless of "best by date," to immediately stop feeding the products to their pets:

• All Cat Pouch Food Products;
• Listed Cat 3.0 oz can products;
• All Dog Pouch Food Products;
• Listed Dog 12.5 oz Canned Products

Kravis said Menu Foods' recall does not include Nutro's dry pet food. Nutro's dry pet foods are not produced by that Canadian company and do not contain wheat gluten. Nutro's dry pet foods, biscuits and treats, are not involved in the recall and remain safe for pets to eat, Kravis said.

Menu Foods, he added, only manufactures wet, canned and pouch products for Nutro.

Menu Foods Update

BrandLook For This Date On The Bottom of Can or Back of PouchVariety DescriptionCan / PouchSizeUPC
Americas Choice, Preferred Pet
Jan/2/10Flaked Tuna 3ozCan3oz54807-59114
Your Pet
Dec/19/09Sliced Beef/Gravy 3ozCan3oz72036-29026
Jan/24/10
Nov 06 09Sliced Variety Pack 3ozCan3oz72036-40013
Pet Pride
Dec/19/09Sliced Beef/Gravy 3ozCan3oz11110-86264
Jan/24/10
Nov 06 09Sliced Variety Pack 3ozCan3oz11110-86003
Dec 05 09
Dec 06 09
Jan 23 10
Jan 24 10
Laura Lynn
Jan/2/10Flaked Tuna 3ozCan3oz86854-02407
Dec/19/09Sliced Beef/Gravy 3ozCan3oz86854-02406
Nutriplan
Dec/19/09Sliced Beef/Gravy 3ozCan3oz41130-06755
Price Chopper
Dec/19/09Sliced Beef/Gravy 3ozCan3oz41735-12828
Publix
Jan/2/10Flaked Tuna 3ozCan3oz41415-08327
Dec/19/09Sliced Beef/Gravy 3ozCan3oz41415-08827
Jan/2/10
Jan/24/10
Stop & Shop Companion
Jan/2/10Flaked Tuna 3ozCan3oz88267-00286
Winn Dixie
Dec/19/09Sliced Beef/Gravy 3ozCan3oz21140-19419
J.E. Mondou
Jan/2/10Flaked Tuna 85gCan85g71127-54202
Medi-Cal
Jan/8/09Dissolution Formula 170gCan170g70705-21280
Nutro Products
All DatesChicken Cacciatore 3ozCan3oz79105-35205
All DatesOrleans Seafood Jambalaya 3ozCan3oz79105-35206
All DatesBeef Ragout 3ozCan3oz79105-35207
All DatesAlaskan Halibut/Rice 3ozCan3oz79105-35221
All DatesKitten Chicken/Lamb 3ozCan3oz79105-35202
All DatesCalifornia Chicken 3ozCan3oz79105-30011
All DatesLamb/Turkey Cutlets 3ozCan3oz79105-30014
All DatesSalmon/Whitefish 3ozCan3oz79105-30013
All DatesBeef/Egg 3ozCan3oz79105-30015
All DatesTurkey/Chicken Liver 3ozCan3oz79105-30016
All DatesSeafood/Tomato/Bisque 3ozCan3oz79105-30017
All DatesHunters Stew with Duck 3ozCan3oz79105-30018
All DatesHunters Stew with Venison 3ozCan3oz79105-30019


Menu Foods Recalls More Cat Food Made With ChemNutra Wheat Gluten...

Cornell Scientists Find A Second Contaminant in Pet Food


Scientists at Cornell University's College of Veterinary Medicine may have found a second contaminant in the wheat gluten used to make the tainted pet food blamed for the deaths and illnesses of scores of cats and dogs across North America, the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review reported.

Scientists also say they may have found this second -- unknown -- contaminant in the urine of infected animals.

"The concerted effort now is to identify what else is in there, and what's in the 'crystals of infected animals' urine and tissue," Dr. Richard Goldstein, associate professor of medicine at Cornell University's College of Veterinary Medicine, told the Tribune-Review.

The Food and Drug Administration has reported the wheat gluten -- imported from China -- is tainted with high amounts of the chemical melamine, commonly used in plastics.

Goldstein told the paper his researchers have ruled out aminopterin -- a rat poison -- as the source of the contamination. New York officials earlier said they discovered that toxin in the tainted pet food.

China Dragging Its Feet

The Tribune-Review also quoted an FDA source saying that China is slowing the investigation of the nationwide pet food recall.

Menu Foods recalled 60 million containers of wet pet food in March after dogs and cats across the country started to become sick and die after eating the food. The recall expanded in recent weeks to include nearly 100 brands of pet food and treats made with melamine-tainted wheat gluten imported from the Chinese company Xuzhou Anying Biologic Technology Development, Co. Ltd.

An FDA official told the Tribune-Review that he asked the Chinese government to help investigate the tainted wheat gluten. But the Chinese government's response, he said, has been slow and incomplete. Chinese officials have previously promised to cooperate with the investigation.

The FDA is now screening all wheat gluten imported from China and the Netherlands and seizing all wheat gluten from Xuzhou Anying.

Melamine Effects Unclear

In the meantime, the FDA and other researchers still aren't certain the high amounts of melamine made the animals sick.

More than 10 laboratories are researching the crystals found in the infected animals and are working together to develop criteria to determine which kidney illnesses were caused by the contaminated pet food, according to the Tribune-Review.

The labs will test urine and tissue samples from pets suspected of becoming ill from the food and possibly samples of the food, Dr. Goldstein told the paper. Pet owners and veterinarians, he said, are advised to keep samples of tissues, urine, and pet food.

The animal rights group, People For The Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA), previously said that excessive amounts of vitamin D in pet food might be the cause of the growing number of kidney problems and deaths in cats and dogs across the country.

PETA's Vice President Bruce Friedrich -- citing laboratory evidence -- urged the FDA to refocus its investigation beyond wheat gluten and consider other possible contaminants in the pet food.

In his letter to Dr. Stephen Sundlof, director of the FDA's Center for Veterinarian Medicine, Friedrich said: "Wheat gluten is used almost exclusively in wet foods. However, the mounting number of complaints of illness and death in cats and dogs who had eaten only dry food strongly suggests that there is a second source of the poisoning, another toxic ingredient.

"Evidence from reputable laboratories indicates that an as yet unnamed ingredient may be to blame, perhaps a form of vitamin D."

Friedrich cited the following examples to illustrate his contention:

• A manufacturing error last year in the production of Royal Canin pet food resulted in excessive amounts of vitamin D3 in the food. This caused hypercalcemia, an abnormally high level of calcium in the blood that caused animals' kidneys to malfunction;

• Research in endocrinology at Cleveland Clinic has confirmed that high levels of vitamin D3 in animals' blood causes kidney malfunction;

• Symptoms associated with excessive vitamin D3 appear identical to the symptoms now being reported in dogs and cats.

This has led "us to believe that this vitamin may be implicated in this new horror," Friedrich told the FDA.



Cornell Scientists Find A Second Contaminant in Pet Food...

Article Image

Veterinary Chain Puts Pet Food Injuries At 39,000


A U.S. chain of veterinary clinics estimates as many as 39,000 dogs and cats were injured by eating tainted pet food manufactured by Menu Foods. The estimate, much higher than previous ones, is based on analysis of its database linking 615 pet hospitals and clinics.

According to the analysis by Banfield, The Pet Hospital, which it shared with the Food and Drug Administration, three out of every 10,000 dogs and cats that ate the contaminated product developed kidney failure. Banfield said the diagnosis of kidney failure in cats rose 30 percent during the three months when the contaminated pet food was sold.

At the same time, the numbers show very little increase in kidney failure among canines, suggesting the toxin in the pet food was a more serious problem for cats than dogs.

At least six pet food manufacturers have recalled products over concerns that the toxin originated in wheat gluten imported from China. The FDA says about one percent of the pet food supply in the U.S. has been withdrawn.

The FDA has said injury estimates based on Banfield's database are likely "authoritative." So far, the agency has confirmed only 16 deaths from an estimated 3,000 cases.

ConsumerAffairs.com continues to hear from dog and cat owners about illnesses and deaths in their animals. And not all these illnesses and deaths are linked to products included in the recall of nearly 100 brands of pet food and treats.

Pet owner John S. of Little Rock, Arkansas, says his Cocker Spaniel became ill after eating Purina dry Dog Chow, which is not being recalled. John says the problems started last October.

"Our Cocker Spaniel had her first seizure in that month," he says, adding his dog hadn't had any previous problems with the food. "Since then, she had another seizure in March, which lasted longer than the first." His dog also developed a large rash after eating the dry Purina Dog Chow, he says.

"(It) covered her entire stomach and seemed to get worse as time went by. We took her to the vet and he ran a blood test on her and did a check-up, telling us she did not have worms or seem to have any other problems to cause the seizures.

"As far as the rash went, her white blood cell count was sky high and she was very sick," John says. "He (the vet) thought it might be an allergy, but was not sure ... and decided to put her on antibiotics for a week."

But the medication didn't help the rash. John says his dog's condition didn't improve until he stopped feeding her the dry Purina Dog Chow.

"The rash has cleared up a lot in the past three days . . . since she stopped eating the food," he says, adding he took her off that dry food even though it wasn't included in the recall. "And she seems to feel a lot better ... not sleeping all the time like she was. I don't know if the food caused the seizures as Cockers are know to have epilepsy, but the date when she had her first seizure dates back to the same month that the tainted pet food supposedly hit the shelves.

"I just hope if there is something wrong with this food, they take it off the shelves."

Another pet owner told us her dog became gravely ill -- and had to be put to sleep -- after eating Nutro dry food. That food isn't included in the recall, either.

Pet owner Judy R. of Williamston, South Carolina, also says she occasionally fed her Maltese two products that are part of the recall: Ol'Roy treats and Mighty Dog in pouches.

"The last canned food that I used was Mighty Dog pouches while traveling from South Carolina to Mississippi," Judy says. "My little Maltese, Angel, got really sick ... I took her to the vet and the blood work showed that she had been poisoned."

And with a specific type of poison: rat poison.

New York Agriculture officials said they discovered the rat poison, aminopterin, in some of the wheat gluten used to make the contaminated pet foods.

Judy wonders if there's a connection between all the pet food and treats her dog ate -- and Angel's rapidly declining condition.

Her veterinarian recommended one final option for Angel -- a complete blood transfusion.

"(But) Angel weighed three pounds, seven ounces, and the vet said that she had a 20 percent chance of making it through a transfusion," Judy said. "Angel was so very sick and we opted to have her put to sleep.

"This had been so very hard for our family, especially my nine-year-old daughter. I would like to find out if this (eating these pet foods and treats) could possibly have caused the death of our little Maltese."

Senate Hearing Scheduled

Durbin

So would U.S. Senator Richard J. Durbin (D-Ill). The Senator, a member of Agriculture Appropriations Subcommittee, has called a special hearing this week to investigate the pet food recall-one of the largest in history.

"Many cats, dogs and other pets, considered members of the family are now suffering as a result of a deeply flawed pet food inspection system," Durbin said in a press release. "The Food and Drug Administration's (FDA) response to this situation has been tragically slow. Pet owners deserve answers. The uncertainty about what is safe to feed their pets has gone on far too long.

"I want to learn exactly when the FDA knew about the contamination, who is inspecting pet food manufacturing plants, and whether we need to force the FDA to update their regulations to protect our pets. Most importantly, I want to hear how the FDA is going to work to resolve the current crisis and ensure this doesn't happen again," Durbin said.

Witnesses expected to be called for the hearing later this week include FDA officials who will be questioned on the timeline of the investigation, the source of the contamination, and the agency's regulatory and inspection responsibilities.

Other witnesses expected to testify include outside experts who will discuss the current state of the pet food industry and regulatory or resource shortfalls that led to the widespread recall of tainted pet food.

Durbin said he will urge the FDA to take action in three specific areas:

Reporting delays -- Menu Foods first noticed a potential problem on February 20, 2007, but did not contact the FDA until March 15, 2007, the Senator's office pointed out. In the meantime, other companies were selling tainted product and the supplier didn't know it had provided wheat gluten contaminated with the chemical, melamine. Durbin wants companies that delay reporting to the FDA and endanger human and animal health to face penalties.

Lack of inspections -- The Emporia, Kansas, Menu Foods facility where many of the tainted products were made had never been inspected by the FDA, the Senator said. According to Durbin, the agency relied on the states to conduct inspections. But the FDA has jurisdiction over all pet food manufacturing facilities and the ultimate responsibility to ensure facilities comply with FDA standards, the Senator said. Where there should be federal regulation, there is instead a patchwork of state inspection systems and voluntary guidance, he said. Durbin wants to require the FDA to work with the states to establish a standardized set of regulations and inspection requirements.

Incomplete data and reporting from the FDA -- Blogs and Web sites have filled a gap and become the most efficient way to share information on the pet food contamination, Durbin said. The Senator wants to direct the FDA to create a similar information sharing system that would allow state veterinarians, pet owners, and others to alert the FDA of possible contaminations.

Durbin is working with Senator Herb Kohl (D-WI), chairman of the Agriculture Appropriations Subcommittee, on the hearing. Witnesses expected to testify are:

• Dr. Stephen F. Sundlof, D.V.M, Ph.D., Director, Center for Veterinary Medicine, Food and Drug Administration;
• Duane Ekedahl, Executive Director, Pet Food Institute;
• Eric Nelson, President, American Association of Feed Control Officers,
• Dr. Elizabeth Hodgkins, Veterinarian;
• Dr. Claudia A. Kirk, Associate Professor of Medicine and Nutrition, University of Tennessee College of Veterinary Medicine.

In a related development, Durbin and Rep. Rosa L. DeLauro (D-Conn.) sent a letter on March 26, 2007, to the Commissioner of the FDA requesting the agency provide:

• Information on the number of pet food manufacturing inspections and violations;
• A detailed timeline of the situation;
• An analysis of the FDA's oversight of pet food manufacturing facilities;
• And a report of action taken since the recent pet food recall.

A response is due by April 10, 2007.



Veterinary Chain Puts Pet Food Injuries At 39,000...

Article Image

Senate Hearing Will Probe Pet Food Safety

As a Senate subcommittee prepares to open a hearing this week on the massive recall of 60 million containers of tainted pet food, ConsumerAffairs.com continues to hear from dog and cat owners about illnesses and deaths in their animals.

And not all these illnesses and deaths are linked to products included in the recall of nearly 100 brands of pet food and treats.

Pet owner John S. of Little Rock, Arkansas, says his Cocker Spaniel became ill after eating Purina dry Dog Chow, which is not being recalled. John says the problems started last October.

"Our Cocker Spaniel had her first seizure in that month," he says, adding his dog hadn't had any previous problems with the food. "Since then, she had another seizure in March, which lasted longer than the first." His dog also developed a large rash after eating the dry Purina Dog Chow, he says.

"(It) covered her entire stomach and seemed to get worse as time went by. We took her to the vet and he ran a blood test on her and did a check-up, telling us she did not have worms or seem to have any other problems to cause the seizures.

"As far as the rash went, her white blood cell count was sky high and she was very sick," John says. "He (the vet) thought it might be an allergy, but was not sure ... and decided to put her on antibiotics for a week."

But the medication didn't help the rash. John says his dog's condition didn't improve until he stopped feeding her the dry Purina Dog Chow.

"The rash has cleared up a lot in the past three days . . . since she stopped eating the food," he says, adding he took her off that dry food even though it wasn't included in the recall. "And she seems to feel a lot better ... not sleeping all the time like she was. I don't know if the food caused the seizures as Cockers are know to have epilepsy, but the date when she had her first seizure dates back to the same month that the tainted pet food supposedly hit the shelves.

"I just hope if there is something wrong with this food, they take it off the shelves."

Another pet owner told us her dog became gravely ill -- and had to be put to sleep -- after eating Nutro dry food. That food isn't included in the recall, either.

Pet owner Judy R. of Williamston, South Carolina, also says she occasionally fed her Maltese two products that are part of the recall: Ol'Roy treats and Mighty Dog in pouches.

"The last canned food that I used was Mighty Dog pouches while traveling from South Carolina to Mississippi," Judy says. "My little Maltese, Angel, got really sick ... I took her to the vet and the blood work showed that she had been poisoned."

And with a specific type of poison: rat poison.

New York Agriculture officials said they discovered the rat poison, aminopterin, in some of the wheat gluten used to make the contaminated pet foods.

Judy wonders if there's a connection between all the pet food and treats her dog ate -- and Angel's rapidly declining condition.

Her veterinarian recommended one final option for Angel -- a complete blood transfusion.

"(But) Angel weighed three pounds, seven ounces, and the vet said that she had a 20 percent chance of making it through a transfusion," Judy said. "Angel was so very sick and we opted to have her put to sleep.

"This had been so very hard for our family, especially my nine-year-old daughter. I would like to find out if this (eating these pet foods and treats) could possibly have caused the death of our little Maltese."

Senate Hearing Scheduled

Durbin

So would U.S. Senator Richard J. Durbin (D-Ill). The Senator, a member of Agriculture Appropriations Subcommittee, has called a special hearing this week to investigate the pet food recall-one of the largest in history.

"Many cats, dogs and other pets, considered members of the family are now suffering as a result of a deeply flawed pet food inspection system," Durbin said in a press release. "The Food and Drug Administration's (FDA) response to this situation has been tragically slow. Pet owners deserve answers. The uncertainty about what is safe to feed their pets has gone on far too long.

"I want to learn exactly when the FDA knew about the contamination, who is inspecting pet food manufacturing plants, and whether we need to force the FDA to update their regulations to protect our pets. Most importantly, I want to hear how the FDA is going to work to resolve the current crisis and ensure this doesn't happen again," Durbin said.

Witnesses expected to be called for the hearing later this week include FDA officials who will be questioned on the timeline of the investigation, the source of the contamination, and the agency's regulatory and inspection responsibilities.

Other witnesses expected to testify include outside experts who will discuss the current state of the pet food industry and regulatory or resource shortfalls that led to the widespread recall of tainted pet food.

Durbin said he will urge the FDA to take action in three specific areas:

Reporting delays -- Menu Foods first noticed a potential problem on February 20, 2007, but did not contact the FDA until March 15, 2007, the Senator's office pointed out. In the meantime, other companies were selling tainted product and the supplier didn't know it had provided wheat gluten contaminated with the chemical, melamine. Durbin wants companies that delay reporting to the FDA and endanger human and animal health to face penalties.

Lack of inspections -- The Emporia, Kansas, Menu Foods facility where many of the tainted products were made had never been inspected by the FDA, the Senator said. According to Durbin, the agency relied on the states to conduct inspections. But the FDA has jurisdiction over all pet food manufacturing facilities and the ultimate responsibility to ensure facilities comply with FDA standards, the Senator said. Where there should be federal regulation, there is instead a patchwork of state inspection systems and voluntary guidance, he said. Durbin wants to require the FDA to work with the states to establish a standardized set of regulations and inspection requirements.

Incomplete data and reporting from the FDA -- Blogs and Web sites have filled a gap and become the most efficient way to share information on the pet food contamination, Durbin said. The Senator wants to direct the FDA to create a similar information sharing system that would allow state veterinarians, pet owners, and others to alert the FDA of possible contaminations.

Durbin is working with Senator Herb Kohl (D-WI), chairman of the Agriculture Appropriations Subcommittee, on the hearing. Witnesses expected to testify are:

• Dr. Stephen F. Sundlof, D.V.M, Ph.D., Director, Center for Veterinary Medicine, Food and Drug Administration;
• Duane Ekedahl, Executive Director, Pet Food Institute;
• Eric Nelson, President, American Association of Feed Control Officers,
• Dr. Elizabeth Hodgkins, Veterinarian;
• Dr. Claudia A. Kirk, Associate Professor of Medicine and Nutrition, University of Tennessee College of Veterinary Medicine.

In a related development, Durbin and Rep. Rosa L. DeLauro (D-Conn.) sent a letter on March 26, 2007, to the Commissioner of the FDA requesting the agency provide:

• Information on the number of pet food manufacturing inspections and violations;
• A detailed timeline of the situation;
• An analysis of the FDA's oversight of pet food manufacturing facilities;
• And a report of action taken since the recent pet food recall.

A response is due by April 10, 2007.



Senate Hearing Will Probe Pet Food Safety...

Article Image

Pet Food Recall Expanded to Sunshine Mills Dog Biscuits


The Sunshine Mills Co. announced today that it's recalling some of its dog biscuits after learning the products were made with tainted wheat gluten imported from China.

The company said the dog biscuits involved in the recall were made at its Red Bay, Alabama, plant during part of March, 2007, and include such brands as Nurture Chicken & Rice, Pet Life Large, Lassie Lamb and Rice, and Pet Life People Pleasers Dog Treats.

The Red Bay, Alabama, company used wheat gluten that may contain melamine, the toxin blamed for a fast-growing number of animal deaths throughout North America.

"We still have a lot of work in understanding why melamine is involved," said Stephen Sundlof, the director of the Center for Veterinary Medicine at the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, at a news conference.

The company said no illnesses or deaths have been reported -- to date -- in connection with these dog biscuits. It also said none of its small and medium sized biscuits -- or its dry dog and cat food and soft and chewy treats for dogs and cats -- are involved in the recall. A complete list of the recalled products is available on the company's Web site: www.sunshinemills.com. Pet owners can also call the company at 1-800-705-2111.

In related news today, Menu Foods announced it's extending its original recall of 95 brands of "cuts and gravy" style cat and dog food to include a broader range of dates.

The company said it's expanding its recall to include all products manufactured with wheat gluten -- that was purchased from ChemNutra Inc. -- from November 8, 2006 to March 6, 2007.

Menu Food's earlier recall included products manufactured during a three month window-from December 3, 2006 through March 6, 2007.

Dry Food Implicated

Meanwhile, consumers who fed their dogs dry food say their pets are now becoming sick or drying. And their dogs' symptoms, they say, mirror those in pets who have eaten one of the recalled wet foods.

There are no dry dog foods on the recall list.

Hills Pet Nutrition recalled some of its dry cat food -- Prescription Diet m/d Feline Dry Food -- because the company that supplied its wheat gluten also supplied that same melamine-tainted product to Menu Foods.

But in the past few days, ConsumerAffairs.com has heard from pet owners across the country who say their dogs become seriously ill or died after eating dry food.

They're pet owners like John P. of San Diego, California, who fed his dog Nutro Max dry food.

"My Dobie died today," he told ConsumerAffairs.com on Monday. "And my Beagle has been throwing up. This problem (of tainted pet food) is larger than anyone is admitting yet. Please feed your pets human food until this is corrected."

Ayden

Cindy C. of Tallahassee, Florida, says her three-year-old dog also became seriously ill after eating Nutro Max dry food.

"He became very lethargic, was drinking a lot of water, and breathing heavy," she says of her dog, Ayden. "Then his belly began to swell ... it was really huge."

Cindy's veterinarian originally suspected heartworms because Ayden's belly was so distended. But those tests came back negative.

The vet then put Ayden on a diuretic and told her to bring him back in five days.

"During this same time, I took Ayden off the Nutro Max and started feeding him chicken and rice," Cindy says, adding her dog had eaten Nutro Max for about a year and hadn't had any problems. "When I took him back to the vet a second time, I had enough money for more tests. Those tests showed Ayden's creatine levels were high, so the vet said to take him off the diuretic."

Cindy says this occurred in February -- weeks before Menu Food announced its massive recall of 60 million containers of pet food.

That's why she didn't think twice about giving Ayden the Nutro Max dry food again.

"But his belly immediately began to swell up again," she says. "That same week, the news came out about the tainted pet food and I saw that Nutro Max was on the list. It was the wet food, but I thought I'm not taking a chance, and I took him off the dry food."

How's Ayden doing now?

"He's fantastic," she says, adding she now feeds him a brand of dog food that doesn't contain corn or wheat gluten. "Since I stopped feeding him the Nutro Max, his belly is back to normal, his breathing is fine, and he has his energy back. We took our first walk together this past weekend."

Cindy says she contacted ConsumerAffairs.com to warn other pet owners about potential problems with dry dog food.

"I'm convinced that the dry food was also contaminated with poison," she says. "It just seems so odd to me that when I started giving him the Nutro Max dry food again -- before I knew about the recall -- that he started getting bloated again.

"I don't want to start a scare. I just felt a responsibility to share my experience with others."

On its Web site, Nutro Products' President and CEO Dave Kravis states: "There are NO Nutro dry pet foods included in this recall, our dry pet foods contain NO wheat gluten and NONE of our dry pet foods are manufactured by Menu Foods."

He adds: "Nutro is preparing to implement additional guidelines that will ensure that the quality control measures used by our co-manufacturers and their suppliers are strengthened so that this deeply troubling situation never happens again."

Two California pet owners also contacted ConsumerAffairs.com this week with concerns about other brands of dry dog food. One of those pet owners says she had to put her dog to sleep because he became so sick after eating Iams dry food.

"My dog was 15, but very active and spunky," says Angela of Alamo, California. "He was fed Iams dry dog food and became very ill, very quickly ... he was lethargic, lost weight rapidly, was vomiting, urinating in the house, and could not walk."

Angela says her dog went into acute renal failure and she had to make the difficult decision to put him to sleep.

"It was horrible. I am still so upset and confused and saddened by his loss. I don't understand what happened. He survived a fall off of a 15' ledge, a hernia, and other things and was still spry and happy. "This renal failure took him by surprise and was so devastating," she adds. "He could not even lift his head when he was being taken to the vet."

Another pet owner, Joanne M. of Desert Hot Springs, California, says her dog became sick after eating another brand of dry dog food -- Stater Brothers.

"My mini-doxie can't keep his hind legs under him anymore and he is lethargic," she says. "My toy rat terrier threw up all the time and suffered from bloating.

"I believe Stater Brothers dry pet food reduced calorie for adult dogs should be tested," she says. "Someone needs to test the dry food."

ChemNutra

The FDA says that it has traced all of the foods containing melamine to wheat gluten imported from China by ChemNutra Inc. of Las Vegas. ChemNutra has recalled all the wheat gluten it received from the Chinese company that supplied the tainted product.

ChemNutra said it took the action after the Food and Drug Administration discovered the chemical melamine in samples of the wheat gluten it imported from Xuzhou Anying Biologic Technology Development Co. Ltd. of China.

ChemNutra said it shipped 792 metric tons of the contaminated wheat gluten from its Kansas City warehouse to three pet food manufacturers -- and one distributor. Those shipments started on November 9, 2006 and ended March 8, 2007.

Sundlof said melamine is a "relatively non-toxic: substance and suggested it may be linked to another substance that has not yet been identified.

No Human Food

ChemNutra said it did not ship any of the melamine-tainted wheat gluten to facilities that make human food. It also said the distributor that received the contaminated wheat gluten only supplies products to the pet food industry.

ChemNutra said in a press release that one of its pet food manufacturers -- which it did not name -- notified the company on March 8, 2007, that the wheat gluten it sold them -- from Xuzhou Anying -- was one of the ingredients linked to the deaths and illnesses of cats and dogs across the county.

The company said it immediately quarantined its entire wheat gluten inventory.

The FDA did not find any other contaminants in the wheat gluten it imported from Xuzhou Anying, the company said. It also said the FDA did not find any impurities in the wheat gluten the company imported from two other Chinese suppliers.

The recalled wheat gluten came from China in 25 kg. paper bags and each shipment had the certificate of analysis information from the supplier, including batch number and the supplier's content analysis and test results.

"ChemNutra is extremely concerned about the purity of all of its products," the company said in its press release. "The company is particularly troubled that the certificates of analysis provided by the above-named supplier did not report the presence of melamine."

Vitamin D

The animal rights group People For The Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) yesterday suggested that excessive amounts of vitamin D in pet food might be the cause of the growing number of kidney problems and deaths in cats and dogs across the country.

PETA also called for the Commissioner of the Food and Drug Administration to immediately resign for his "complete failure" in handling the Menu Foods recall of 60 million containers of wet dog and cat food.

PETA Vice President Bruce Friedrich -- citing laboratory evidence -- today urged the FDA to refocus its investigation beyond wheat gluten and consider other possible contaminants in the pet food.

In his letter to Dr. Stephen Sundlof, director of the FDA's Center for Veterinarian Medicine, Friedrich said: "Wheat gluten is used almost exclusively in wet foods. However, the mounting number of complaints of illness and death in cats and dogs who had eaten only dry food strongly suggests that there is a second source of the poisoning, another toxic ingredient.

"Evidence from reputable laboratories indicates that an as yet unnamed ingredient may be to blame, perhaps a form of vitamin D."

Friedrich cited the following examples to illustrate his contention:

• A manufacturing error last year in the production of Royal Canin pet food resulted in excessive amounts of vitamin D3 in the food. This caused hypercalcemia, an abnormally high level of calcium in the blood that caused animals' kidneys to malfunction;

• Research in endocrinology at Cleveland Clinic has confirmed that high levels of vitamin D3 in animals' blood causes kidney malfunction;

• Symptoms associated with excessive vitamin D3 appear identical to the symptoms now being reported in dogs and cats. This has led "us to believe that this vitamin may be implicated in this new horror," Friedrich writes.

Friedrich asked Sundlof to let him know if the FDA is testing a wide sample of implicated cat and dog foods -- both wet and dry -- for vitamin D3 levels.

He also implored Sundlof to "please tell the public what other measures you are taking to get to the bottom of this crisis."

Wheat Gluten

FDA officials said last week the wheat gluten in the recalled pet foods is contaminated with melamine, a chemical commonly used in plastics.

But the New York Department of Agriculture and an agricultural laboratory in Canada dispute that finding. They say the pet food is contaminated with a rat poison called Aminopterin.

The New York lab has 42 scientists and support staff and a $3.5 million annual budget. It tests about 20,000 samples of food annually. It has some of the latest high-tech equipment, some of it purchased with Homeland Security funds as a safeguard against bioterrorism.

The director of the New York lab, Daniel Rice, told USA Today that all of pieces of the poisoning puzzle have not yet been found.

"I guess we don't think this is a closed case yet," he said.



Pet Food Recall Expanded to Sunshine Mills Dog Biscuits...

American Importer Recalls All Wheat Gluten

The American company that imported the contaminated ingredient linked to the death and illnesses of pets nationwide has recalled all the wheat gluten it received from the Chinese company that supplied the tainted product.

ChemNutra said it took the action after the Food and Drug Administration discovered the chemical melamine in samples of the wheat gluten it imported from Xuzhou Anying Biologic Technology Development Co. Ltd. of China.

ChemNutra said it shipped 792 metric tons of the contaminated wheat gluten from its Kansas City warehouse to three pet food manufacturers -- and one distributor. Those shipments started on November 9, 2006 and ended March 8, 2007.

The Las Vegas, Nevada, company said it did not ship any of the melamine-tainted wheat gluten to facilities that make human food. It also said the distributor that received the contaminated wheat gluten only supplies products to the pet food industry.

ChemNutra said in a press release that one of its pet food manufacturers -- which it did not name -- notified the company on March 8, 2007, that the wheat gluten it sold them -- from Xuzhou Anying -- was one of the ingredients linked to the deaths and illnesses of cats and dogs across the county.

The company said it immediately quarantined its entire wheat gluten inventory.

The FDA did not find any other contaminants in the wheat gluten it imported from Xuzhou Anying, the company said. It also said the FDA did not find any impurities in the wheat gluten the company imported from two other Chinese suppliers.

The recalled wheat gluten came from China in 25 kg. paper bags and each shipment had the certificate of analysis information from the supplier, including batch number and the supplier's content analysis and test results.

"ChemNutra is extremely concerned about the purity of all of its products," the company said in its press release. "The company is particularly troubled that the certificates of analysis provided by the above-named supplier did not report the presence of melamine."

Vitamin D

The animal rights group People For The Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) yesterday suggested that excessive amounts of vitamin D in pet food might be the cause of the growing number of kidney problems and deaths in cats and dogs across the country.

PETA also called for the Commissioner of the Food and Drug Administration to immediately resign for his "complete failure" in handling the Menu Foods recall of 60 million containers of wet dog and cat food.

PETA Vice President Bruce Friedrich -- citing laboratory evidence -- today urged the FDA to refocus its investigation beyond wheat gluten and consider other possible contaminants in the pet food.

In his letter to Dr. Stephen Sundlof, director of the FDA's Center for Veterinarian Medicine, Friedrich said: "Wheat gluten is used almost exclusively in wet foods. However, the mounting number of complaints of illness and death in cats and dogs who had eaten only dry food strongly suggests that there is a second source of the poisoning, another toxic ingredient.

"Evidence from reputable laboratories indicates that an as yet unnamed ingredient may be to blame, perhaps a form of vitamin D."

Friedrich cited the following examples to illustrate his contention:

• A manufacturing error last year in the production of Royal Canin pet food resulted in excessive amounts of vitamin D3 in the food. This caused hypercalcemia, an abnormally high level of calcium in the blood that caused animals' kidneys to malfunction;

• Research in endocrinology at Cleveland Clinic has confirmed that high levels of vitamin D3 in animals' blood causes kidney malfunction;

• Symptoms associated with excessive vitamin D3 appear identical to the symptoms now being reported in dogs and cats. This has led "us to believe that this vitamin may be implicated in this new horror," Friedrich writes.

Friedrich asked Sundlof to let him know if the FDA is testing a wide sample of implicated cat and dog foods -- both wet and dry -- for vitamin D3 levels.

He also implored Sundlof to "please tell the public what other measures you are taking to get to the bottom of this crisis."

Wheat Gluten

FDA officials said last week the wheat gluten in the recalled pet foods is contaminated with melamine, a chemical commonly used in plastics.

But the New York Department of Agriculture and an agricultural laboratory in Canada dispute that finding. They say the pet food is contaminated with a rat poison called Aminopterin.

The New York lab has 42 scientists and support staff and a $3.5 million annual budget. It tests about 20,000 samples of food annually. It has some of the latest high-tech equipment, some of it purchased with Homeland Security funds as a safeguard against bioterrorism.

The director of the New York lab, Daniel Rice, told USA Today that all of pieces of the poisoning puzzle have not yet been found.

"I guess we don't think this is a closed case yet," he said.

PETA Demands Resignation

In other news, PETA has called for the commissioner of the FDA to resign in the wake of the agency's handling of Menu Food's massive recall. It issued a timeline that it said documented the agency's failings.

"The FDA is feeding the public a line, and the American people's faith in the government is dying along with dogs and cats," Friedrich says. "The agency's failure to pinpoint the cause of death for animals who have eaten only dry food is cause for the commissioner to resign or be fired."

In an April 2, 2007 letter, PETA's president Ingrid Newkirk, outlined four specific reasons for FDA Commissioner Andrew von Eschenbach to resign:

• The FDA's failure to recommend a recall of Menu Foods' products -- or tell the public the pet foods might be harming or killing their animals -- before the company announced its recall on March 16, 2007. PETA says Menu Foods knew "its food was sickening animals as early as February 20, 2007, and killed more animals in a crude feeding test at the end of the month."

• The FDA's refusal to recommend a recall or advise the public that dry pet food might also be contaminated -- even though the "FDA knew from numerous consumer complaints that dry food has been implicated in this tragedy."

• The FDA's refusal to name the dry pet food manufacturer that received a contaminated ingredient used in the recalled pet foods. "The FDA refused to name the company or advise consumers which foods to avoid in order to ensure that no more beloved animals would be killed by the FDA-approved food fed to them," Newkirk wrote is the letter.

• The FDA's apparent cover-up of evidence that reveals melamine is not what's causing cats and dogs to become sick and die. "At the FDA's press conference on March 30, the agency did not report the fact that the New York Department of Agriculture and a top Canadian agricultural laboratory both dispute the FDA's finding," Newkirk wrote.

She also cited a New York Times article that quoted a spokesperson for the Department of Agriculture saying: "We don't think this is the final conclusion. Melamine is not a known toxin ... we are confident we found Aminopterin, and it makes sense with the pathology."

Newkirk's letter to the FDA's commissioner also states: "Under your leadership, the FDA adopted a wait-and-see attitude while animals went into renal failure and households and children lost cherished members of their family.

"Your failure to act in a timely fashion, let along speedily, to demand a recall showed that your interests lie in the protecting the pet food industry's profit margin, not animals and those who love them."

FDA MIA

PETA Vice President Friedrich described the FDA as "MIA when it comes to protecting dogs and cats."

"The FDA has completely abdicated its responsibility of regulating the pet food industry," he told ConsumerAffairs.com today. "It has handed over pet food regulations to a non-governmental agency with no power at all-the Association of American Feed Control Officials."

PETA has also called for criminal investigations into Iams, Menu Foods, and other companies to determine if there were delays that caused more suffering and deaths of animals.

In a letter to the Prosecuting Attorney of Hamilton County, Ohio, PETA writes: "As we see it, Iams and its agents may have violated Ohio (anti-cruelty) law. Iams' manufacturer, Menu Foods, reportedly knew about the food contamination issues as early as February 20, yet a product recall was not announced until March 16 -- almost a full month later -- a month in which peoples' animal companions were sickened and may have died.

"Iams, by delaying its recall announcement, should be held fully accountable for every pertinent death, to the extent allowed by Ohio law."


American Importer Recalls All Wheat Gluten...

PETA Suggests Vitamin D to Blame for Animal Deaths

The animal rights group, People For The Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA), says that excessive amounts of vitamin D in pet food might be the cause of the growing number of kidney problems and deaths in cats and dogs across the country.

PETA also called for the Commissioner of the Food and Drug Administration to immediately resign for his "complete failure" in handling the Menu Foods recall of 60 million containers of wet dog and cat food.

PETA Vice President Bruce Friedrich -- citing laboratory evidence -- today urged the FDA to refocus its investigation beyond wheat gluten and consider other possible contaminants in the pet food.

In his letter to Dr. Stephen Sundlof, director of the FDA's Center for Veterinarian Medicine, Friedrich said: "Wheat gluten is used almost exclusively in wet foods. However, the mounting number of complaints of illness and death in cats and dogs who had eaten only dry food strongly suggests that there is a second source of the poisoning, another toxic ingredient.

"Evidence from reputable laboratories indicates that an as yet unnamed ingredient may be to blame, perhaps a form of vitamin D."

Friedrich cited the following examples to illustrate his contention:

• A manufacturing error last year in the production of Royal Canin pet food resulted in excessive amounts of vitamin D3 in the food. This caused hypercalcemia, an abnormally high level of calcium in the blood that caused animals' kidneys to malfunction;

• Research in endocrinology at Cleveland Clinic has confirmed that high levels of vitamin D3 in animals' blood causes kidney malfunction;

• Symptoms associated with excessive vitamin D3 appear identical to the symptoms now being reported in dogs and cats. This has led "us to believe that this vitamin may be implicated in this new horror," Friedrich writes.

Friedrich asked Sundlof to let him know if the FDA is testing a wide sample of implicated cat and dog foods -- both wet and dry -- for vitamin D3 levels.

He also implored Sundlof to "please tell the public what other measures you are taking to get to the bottom of this crisis."

Wheat Gluten

FDA officials said last week the wheat gluten in the recalled pet foods is contaminated with melamine, a chemical commonly used in plastics.

But the New York Department of Agriculture and an agricultural laboratory in Canada dispute that finding. They say the pet food is contaminated with a rat poison called Aminopterin.

The New York lab has 42 scientists and support staff and a $3.5 million annual budget. It tests about 20,000 samples of food annually. It has some of the latest high-tech equipment, some of it purchased with Homeland Security funds as a safeguard against bioterrorism.

The director of the New York lab, Daniel Rice, told USA Today that all of pieces of the poisoning puzzle have not yet been found.

"I guess we don't think this is a closed case yet," he said.

PETA Demands Resignation

In other news, PETA has called for the commissioner of the FDA to resign in the wake of the agency's handling of Menu Food's massive recall. It issued a timeline that it said documented the agency's failings.

"The FDA is feeding the public a line, and the American people's faith in the government is dying along with dogs and cats," Friedrich says. "The agency's failure to pinpoint the cause of death for animals who have eaten only dry food is cause for the commissioner to resign or be fired."

In an April 2, 2007 letter, PETA's president Ingrid Newkirk, outlined four specific reasons for FDA Commissioner Andrew von Eschenbach to resign:

• The FDA's failure to recommend a recall of Menu Foods' products -- or tell the public the pet foods might be harming or killing their animals -- before the company announced its recall on March 16, 2007. PETA says Menu Foods knew "its food was sickening animals as early as February 20, 2007, and killed more animals in a crude feeding test at the end of the month."

• The FDA's refusal to recommend a recall or advise the public that dry pet food might also be contaminated -- even though the "FDA knew from numerous consumer complaints that dry food has been implicated in this tragedy."

• The FDA's refusal to name the dry pet food manufacturer that received a contaminated ingredient used in the recalled pet foods. "The FDA refused to name the company or advise consumers which foods to avoid in order to ensure that no more beloved animals would be killed by the FDA-approved food fed to them," Newkirk wrote is the letter.

• The FDA's apparent cover-up of evidence that reveals melamine is not what's causing cats and dogs to become sick and die. "At the FDA's press conference on March 30, the agency did not report the fact that the New York Department of Agriculture and a top Canadian agricultural laboratory both dispute the FDA's finding," Newkirk wrote.

She also cited a New York Times article that quoted a spokesperson for the Department of Agriculture saying: "We don't think this is the final conclusion. Melamine is not a known toxin ... we are confident we found Aminopterin, and it makes sense with the pathology."

Newkirk's letter to the FDA's commissioner also states: "Under your leadership, the FDA adopted a wait-and-see attitude while animals went into renal failure and households and children lost cherished members of their family.

"Your failure to act in a timely fashion, let along speedily, to demand a recall showed that your interests lie in the protecting the pet food industry's profit margin, not animals and those who love them."

FDA MIA

PETA Vice President Friedrich described the FDA as "MIA when it comes to protecting dogs and cats."

"The FDA has completely abdicated its responsibility of regulating the pet food industry," he told ConsumerAffairs.com today. "It has handed over pet food regulations to a non-governmental agency with no power at all-the Association of American Feed Control Officials."

PETA has also called for criminal investigations into Iams, Menu Foods, and other companies to determine if there were delays that caused more suffering and deaths of animals.

In a letter to the Prosecuting Attorney of Hamilton County, Ohio, PETA writes: "As we see it, Iams and its agents may have violated Ohio (anti-cruelty) law. Iams' manufacturer, Menu Foods, reportedly knew about the food contamination issues as early as February 20, yet a product recall was not announced until March 16 -- almost a full month later -- a month in which peoples' animal companions were sickened and may have died.

"Iams, by delaying its recall announcement, should be held fully accountable for every pertinent death, to the extent allowed by Ohio law."

Chinese Blamed

The Food and Drug Administration yesterday blocked the Chinese manufacturer suspected of producing melamine-tainted wheat gluten -- and linked to scores of kidney-related illnesses and deaths in pets across the country -- from importing the product into the United States.

In an import alert dated March 31, 2007, the FDA identified the Chinese manufacturer as Xuzhou Anying Biologic Technology Development Company -- www.xzay.com -- of Peixian, China.

"In March, 2007, the FDA became aware of the illness and death of cats and dogs associated with certain pet foods," the alert states, referring to the massive recall of 60 million containers of wet pet food produced by Menu Foods of Canada.

"Subsequently, samples of the implicated pet food were analyzed and found to contain melamine. The consumption of pet food containing melamine may be associated with acute renal failure in cats. Investigations have revealed that the source of the melamine was wheat gluten, which is an ingredient in the pet food.

The alert adds: "Appropriate screening criteria have been set for wheat gluten from China and the Netherlands, as a country through which trans-shipping of Chinese wheat gluten may occur. "

A sales manager for Xuzhou Anying told MSNBC the company was aware of the FDA's import alert. But manager Geng Ziujuan said her company had not made the contaminated wheat gluten, claiming it purchased the product from companies in neighboring provinces of China.

The sales manager also said Xuzhou Anying sold the wheat gluten to another company called Suzhou Textile Import and Export Company.

"There are many other exporters and I don't see why they would just blame us," Geng told MSNBC, adding the company was inspecting its products. It's too early, she said, to announce any results.

Massive Recall

Menu Foods' massive recall affects such national brands as Procter & Gamble's Iams and Eukanuba, Nestle SA's Purina Mighty Dog and others, including some sold at Wal-Mart and Safeway.

Other pet food companies, including Del Monte Pet Products and Hill's Pet Nutrition, are now recalling products made with the same melamine-tainted wheat gluten imported from China.

Del Monte Pet Products recalled some of its wet pet foods and pet treats sold under the Jerky Treats, Gravy Train Beef Stick and Pounce Meaty Morsel brands.

It also recalled some of its dog snacks sold under private label brands. The company said it took that action after learning from the FDA that wheat gluten supplied to Del Monte Pet Products -- from a manufacturing plant in China -- contained melamine.


PETA Suggests Vitamin D to Blame for Animal Deaths...

Del Monte the Latest to Recall Pet Food


Del Monte is the latest to recall some of its pet food products. The company said it's recalling pet treats sold under the Jerky Treats, Gravy Train Beef Sticks and Pounce Meaty Morsels brands as well as select dog snack and wet dog food products sold under private label brands.

A full list of the recalled products appears below.

The company said it learned from the FDA that wheat gluten supplied to Del Monte Pet Products from a specific manufacturing facility in China contained melamine. Melamine is a substance used in floor tiles, kitchenware, and fire retardant fabrics, blamed for the massive recall of Menu Foods and other pet products.

The company said the recall affects less than one-tenth of one percent of Del Monte Pet Products' annual pet food and pet treat production. It said the adulterated ingredients were used over the last three months.

Earlier, and Nestle Purina added some of their products to the growing recall of products blamed for a wave of dog and cat deaths throughout North America.

Nestle Purina recalled all sizes and varieties of Alpo Prime Cuts in Gravy dog food marked with specific date codes. The company said some of the cans might be contaminated with melamine, the toxin suspected of causing the pet illnesses.

"We're very confident that we've isolated this problem," said Keith Schopp, a spokesman for Nestle Purina. "This is just one canned variety of Alpo, and it's one of many varieties of Alpo canned products. No dry products are involved. No cat products are involved."

But soothing corporate statements come as little comfort to affected pet owners, like Nicole of Key West, Fla.

"I have two small chihuahuas that ate Alpo Prime Cuts dog food. One of my dogs is currently in the hospital because her kidneys are failing. Sophie is only 6 months old and is very ill," she told ConsumerAffairs.com. "My other dog Charlie is beginning to show signs as well. This has caused me a great deal of stress, time off work, money and possibly the lives of my animals."

Del Monte Recall

Here are the products recalled by Del Monte, according to the company's Web site:

BRANDED

Production Code/Best By Date

Jerky Treats Beef Flavor Dog Snacks

Code:
Best By:

TP7C05
Aug 05 08

TP7B07
Aug 07 08

TP7B08
Aug 08 08

TP7B09
Aug 09 08

TP6B10
Aug 10 08

Code:
Best By:

TP7B15
Aug 15 08

TP7C05
Sep 02 08

TP7C06
Sep 03 08

Gravy Train Beef Sticks Dog Snacks

Code:
Best By:

TP7B19
Aug 19 08

TP7B20
Aug 20 08

TP7B21
Aug 21 08

Pounce Meaty Morsels Moist Chicken Flavor Cat Treats

Code:
Best By:

TP7C07
Sep 04 08

TP7C12
Sep 09 08

PRIVATE LABEL

Production Code/Best By Date

Ol' Roy Beef Flavor Jerky Strips Dog Treats

Code:
Best By:

TP7B06
Aug 06 08

TP7B07
Aug 07 08

TP7C05
Sep 02 08

TP7C06
Sep 03 08

TP7C07
Sep 04 08

Code:
Best By:

TP7C08
Sep 05 08

Ol' Roy Beef Flavor Snack Sticks Dog Treats

Code:
Best By:

TP7B19
Aug 19 08

TP7B20
Aug 20 08

TP7B21
Aug 21 08

TP7C08
Sep 05 08

TP7C09
Sep 06 08

Ol' Roy Bark'n Bac'n Beef & Bacon Flavor Dog Treats

Code:
Best By:

TP7C14
Sep 11 08

Ol' Roy with Beef Hearty Cuts in Gravy Dog Food

Code:
Best By:

BC6M21
Dec 21 09

Ol' Roy with Beef Hearty Strips in Gravy Dog Food

Code:
Best By:

BC7A19
Jan 19 10

Ol' Roy Country Stew Hearty Cuts in Gravy Dog Food

Code:
Best By:

BC6M15
Dec 15 09

Dollar General Beef Flavored Jerky Strips Dog Treats

Code:
Best By:

TP7C06
Sep 03 08

Dollar General Beef Flavored Beef Sticks Dog Treats

Code:
Best By:

TP7B20
Aug 20 08

TP7B21
Aug 21 08

Happy Tails Beef Flavor Jerky Strips

Code:
Best By:

TPY7B08
Aug 08 08

TP7B09
Aug 09 08

Happy Tails Meaty Cuts with Beef in Gravy Dog Food

Code:
Best By:

BC7A29
Jan 29 10

Del Monte said customers can call (800) 949-3799 for more information about the recall and for instructions on obtaining a product refund.

Recall Began Two Weeks Ago

The massive recall began two weeks ago, when Canada-based Menu Foods recalled 60 millions cans and pouches of "cuts and gravy" moist dog and cat food produced at its plant in Emporia, Kan., between Dec. 3 and March 6. It has since affected such national brands as Procter & Gamble's Iams and Eukanuba, Nestle SA's Purina Mighty Dog and others, including some sold at Wal-Mart and Safeway.

Joanne of Bentleyville, Penn., was an Iams customer. When her cat refused to eat the Iams Select Bites pouches Joanne brough home, she let her border collie eat them. The dog died a slow death from kidney failure.

"She loved cat food ... so I gave it to (her) as a treat she never gets. The following day I tried the food again with the cat but again he would not eat it so again I gave it to the dog. I had no idea that I thought the food was a treat for my dog was actually poison."

"My life will never be the same. I feel I poisoned one of my family," Joanne said in a complaint to ConsumerAffairs.com. "I trusted a company. I will never do that again."

Menu Food's President and CEO says his company still doesn't know how wheat gluten contaminated with a chemical commonly used in plastic wound up in its products.

President Paul K. Henderson also said the contaminated wheat gluten is not in any of its other product that are outside the scope of the company's massive recall of 60 millions containers of "cuts and gravy" style pet food.

Meanwhile, Hill's Pet Nutrition recalled its Prescription Diet m/d Feline dry cat food. The food included wheat gluten from the same supplier that Menu Foods used. The recall doesn't involve any other Prescription Diet or Science Diet products, the company said.

The Food and Drug Administration -- and an outside laboratory -- announced on Friday that tests found a chemical called melamine in samples of the tainted pet foods involved in the recall.

"Melamine has been found in the finished product that was the subject of recall and has not been found in other Menu Foods pet food outside of the recall," Henderson said at a press conference Friday afternoon.

Cornell University officials also confirmed they found melamine -- used in floor tiles, kitchenware, and fire retardant fabrics -- in the urine and kidney of a sick cat. New York officials say they've detected that chemical, too.

Henderson said the melamine-tainted wheat gluten came from a new supplier, who imported the ingredient from China. He said the company stopped using that supplier after dogs and cats across the country showed symptoms of kidney disease or died after eating Menu's pet foods.

"Needless to say, we have a great deal of interest in finding out why we were supplied with this kind of product," Henderson said of the tainted wheat gluten. "This is a subject of very great interest to us and our lawyers and you can expect that we will be following up."

He added: "For litigation purposes, we cannot elaborate at this time."

Grieving pet owners in the United States and Canada have filed lawsuits against Menu Foods, alleging the company was negligent and should have warned consumers about its tainted products before the March 16, 2007, recall.

Problem Solved?

Henderson said pet owners shouldn't worry about the safety of the cat and dog food the company is now producing.

"Let me be clear on this -- we have removed that (tainted wheat gluten) problem from our system," he said. "Our products are safe. We continue to engage in the highest levels of monitoring and testing in the pet food industry. These tests will be expanded as a result of this experience."

He also pointed out: "Melamine has not been found in the wheat gluten that we obtain from our other suppliers ... all of the testing that has been conducted, including the routine taste tests that were underway prior to the discovery of this problem, have demonstrated that those products not associated with the suspect wheat gluten performed very well and in a manner consistent with historic norms."

The tainted wheat gluten, however, might have been used to make dry dog food.

Stephen F. Sundlof, director of the FDA's Center for Veterinary Medicine, said the melamine-tainted ingredient was shipped to an unnamed company -- one that manufactures dry pet food.

The federal agency is now investigating whether that contaminated ingredient was used to make any dry pet foods.

When asked if pet owners could be feeding unsafe food to their animals, Sundlof said: "It is possible, but I think we've been following every lead that we can. My sense is that we have gotten most of it under control."

Last week, New York officials announced they discovered the toxin aminopterin -- used as rat poison in other countries and as a cancer drug in the United States -- in Menu's contaminated products.

But the FDA said its tests -- and those by the outside lab -- did not reveal the rat poison in the recalled pet food. Or in the wheat gluten.

Wheat gluten is used a thickening agent and source of protein in pet foods, but it's also used in some human foods.

The FDA said today that it has found no indication the contaminated ingredient is in any food humans eat. The agency said it would alert the public if it found melamine in any other foods.

The FDA has confirmed at least 16 deaths linked to Menu's contaminated pet foods, but officials expect that number to dramatically increase. The FDA said it has received calls from more than 8,000 veterinarians and pet owners.

Earlier this week, the Veterinarians Information Network, a Web site of 30,000 veterinarians and veterinary students, announced its members have reported 104 deaths linked to Menu Foods' contaminated products. The majority of those deaths -- 88 -- involved cats.

The Web site also received 11 reports of dogs dying after eating Menu Foods' tainted food. The remaining five deaths did not list a species.

In addition, VIN said its members have seen 471 cases of kidney failure since Menu Foods announced its massive recall on March 16, 2007.

The Web site PetConnection.com says it has -- as of March 30, 2007 -- received 2,400 unconfirmed reports of dog and cat deaths linked to Menu Foods.

Henderson offered his company's condolences to grieving pet owners.

"All of us at Menu Foods want to express our sympathy to those people who have suffered with sickness and loss of pets," he said. "We are pet-people and we have almost 1,000 caring employees who are dedicated to making food that is safe, nutritious and palatable."

He added: "We are angered that a source outside of the company has apparently adulterated the product causing this regrettable loss."

As the investigation continues, pet owners are advised to watch their dogs and cats for symptoms of kidney failure, including loss of appetite, lethargy, vomiting, excessive drinking and either excessive or no urination.

Veterinarians, however, warn that animals do not show symptoms until about 70 percent of the kidney function is lost.

A complete list of the recalled Menu pet foods is available at Menu Food's Web site: www.menufoods.com/recall or contact the company at (866) 463-6738 or (866) 895-2708.

Del Monte the Latest to Recall Pet Food...

Alpo Adds Some Dog Food to Massive Recall List; Pet Food Problem Solved, Says Menu Food CEO


Add Alpo to the list of pet food brands recalling wet pet food after a wave of dog and cat deaths throughout North America.

Nestle Purina PetCare Co. announced late Friday that it was recalling all sizes and varieties of Alpo Prime Cuts in Gravy dog food marked with specific date codes. The company said some of the cans might be contaminated with melamine, the toxin suspected of causing the pet illnesses.

"We're very confident that we've isolated this problem," said Keith Schopp, a spokesman for Nestle Purina. "This is just one canned variety of Alpo, and it's one of many varieties of Alpo canned products. No dry products are involved. No cat products are involved."

But soothing corporate statements come as little comfort to affected pet owners, like Nicole of Key West, Fla.

"I have two small chihuahuas that ate Alpo Prime Cuts dog food. One of my dogs is currently in the hospital because her kidneys are failing. Sophie is only 6 months old and is very ill," she told ConsumerAffairs.com. "My other dog Charlie is beginning to show signs as well. This has caused me a great deal of stress, time off work, money and possibly the lives of my animals."

The massive recall began two weeks ago, when Canada-based Menu Foods recalled 60 millions cans and pouches of "cuts and gravy" moist dog and cat food produced at its plant in Emporia, Kan., between Dec. 3 and March 6. It has since affected such national brands as Procter & Gamble's Iams and Eukanuba, Nestle SA's Purina Mighty Dog and others, including some sold at Wal-Mart and Safeway.

Joanne of Bentleyville, Penn., was an Iams customer. When her cat refused to eat the Iams Select Bites pouches Joanne brough home, she let her border collie eat them. The dog died a slow death from kidney failure.

"She loved cat food ... so I gave it to (her) as a treat she never gets. The following day I tried the food again with the cat but again he would not eat it so again I gave it to the dog. I had no idea that I thought the food was a treat for my dog was actually poison."

"My life will never be the same. I feel I poisoned one of my family," Joanne said in a complaint to ConsumerAffairs.com. "I trusted a company. I will never do that again."

Menu Food's President and CEO says his company still doesn't know how wheat gluten contaminated with a chemical commonly used in plastic wound up in its products.

President Paul K. Henderson also said the contaminated wheat gluten is not in any of its other product that are outside the scope of the company's massive recall of 60 millions containers of "cuts and gravy" style pet food.

Meanwhile, Hill's Pet Nutrition recalled its Prescription Diet m/d Feline dry cat food. The food included wheat gluten from the same supplier that Menu Foods used. The recall doesn't involve any other Prescription Diet or Science Diet products, the company said.

The Food and Drug Administration -- and an outside laboratory -- announced on Friday that tests found a chemical called melamine in samples of the tainted pet foods involved in the recall.

"Melamine has been found in the finished product that was the subject of recall and has not been found in other Menu Foods pet food outside of the recall," Henderson said at a press conference Friday afternoon.

Cornell University officials also confirmed they found melamine -- used in floor tiles, kitchenware, and fire retardant fabrics -- in the urine and kidney of a sick cat. New York officials say they've detected that chemical, too.

Henderson said the melamine-tainted wheat gluten came from a new supplier, who imported the ingredient from China. He said the company stopped using that supplier after dogs and cats across the country showed symptoms of kidney disease or died after eating Menu's pet foods.

"Needless to say, we have a great deal of interest in finding out why we were supplied with this kind of product," Henderson said of the tainted wheat gluten. "This is a subject of very great interest to us and our lawyers and you can expect that we will be following up."

He added: "For litigation purposes, we cannot elaborate at this time."

Grieving pet owners in the United States and Canada have filed lawsuits against Menu Foods, alleging the company was negligent and should have warned consumers about its tainted products before the March 16, 2007, recall.

Problem Solved?

Henderson said pet owners shouldn't worry about the safety of the cat and dog food the company is now producing.

"Let me be clear on this -- we have removed that (tainted wheat gluten) problem from our system," he said. "Our products are safe. We continue to engage in the highest levels of monitoring and testing in the pet food industry. These tests will be expanded as a result of this experience."

He also pointed out: "Melamine has not been found in the wheat gluten that we obtain from our other suppliers ... all of the testing that has been conducted, including the routine taste tests that were underway prior to the discovery of this problem, have demonstrated that those products not associated with the suspect wheat gluten performed very well and in a manner consistent with historic norms."

The tainted wheat gluten, however, might have been used to make dry dog food.

Stephen F. Sundlof, director of the FDA's Center for Veterinary Medicine, said the melamine-tainted ingredient was shipped to an unnamed company -- one that manufactures dry pet food.

The federal agency is now investigating whether that contaminated ingredient was used to make any dry pet foods.

When asked if pet owners could be feeding unsafe food to their animals, Sundlof said: "It is possible, but I think we've been following every lead that we can. My sense is that we have gotten most of it under control."

Last week, New York officials announced they discovered the toxin aminopterin -- used as rat poison in other countries and as a cancer drug in the United States -- in Menu's contaminated products.

But the FDA said its tests -- and those by the outside lab -- did not reveal the rat poison in the recalled pet food. Or in the wheat gluten.

Wheat gluten is used a thickening agent and source of protein in pet foods, but it's also used in some human foods.

The FDA said today that it has found no indication the contaminated ingredient is in any food humans eat. The agency said it would alert the public if it found melamine in any other foods.

The FDA has confirmed at least 16 deaths linked to Menu's contaminated pet foods, but officials expect that number to dramatically increase. The FDA said it has received calls from more than 8,000 veterinarians and pet owners.

Earlier this week, the Veterinarians Information Network, a Web site of 30,000 veterinarians and veterinary students, announced its members have reported 104 deaths linked to Menu Foods' contaminated products. The majority of those deaths -- 88 -- involved cats.

The Web site also received 11 reports of dogs dying after eating Menu Foods' tainted food. The remaining five deaths did not list a species.

In addition, VIN said its members have seen 471 cases of kidney failure since Menu Foods announced its massive recall on March 16, 2007.

The Web site PetConnection.com says it has -- as of March 30, 2007 -- received 2,400 unconfirmed reports of dog and cat deaths linked to Menu Foods.

Henderson offered his company's condolences to grieving pet owners.

"All of us at Menu Foods want to express our sympathy to those people who have suffered with sickness and loss of pets," he said. "We are pet-people and we have almost 1,000 caring employees who are dedicated to making food that is safe, nutritious and palatable."

He added: "We are angered that a source outside of the company has apparently adulterated the product causing this regrettable loss."

As the investigation continues, pet owners are advised to watch their dogs and cats for symptoms of kidney failure, including loss of appetite, lethargy, vomiting, excessive drinking and either excessive or no urination.

Veterinarians, however, warn that animals do not show symptoms until about 70 percent of the kidney function is lost.

A complete list of the recalled Menu pet foods is available at Menu Food's Web site: www.menufoods.com/recall or contact the company at (866) 463-6738 or (866) 895-2708.



Alpo Adds Some Dog Food to Massive Recall List; Pet Food Problem Solved, Says Menu Food CEO...

FDA Confirms It Found Plastic in Tainted Pet Food

It may not just be rat poison that's causing dogs and cats across the country to become sick and die after eating Menu Foods' tainted products.

The Food and Drug Administration announced today that its scientists -- and an independent laboratory -- found a chemical commonly used in plastic in samples of the 60 million containers of wet pet food the Canadian company has recalled.

The FDA said those tests found melamine -- a chemical used in floor tiles, kitchenware, and fire retardant fabrics -- in Menu's tainted pet food.

Wheat gluten, a source of vegetable protein, is also used in some human foods, but the FDA emphasized it had found no indication that the contaminated ingredient had been used in food for people. The FDA said it would alert the public quickly if the melamine was found in any foods other than the recalled pet food.

The FDA also found the chemical in the ingredient the FDA suspects is the source of the contamination -- the wheat gluten the company imports from China.

And that melamine-contaminated wheat gluten, the FDA announced, might have been used to make dry dog food. If that's the case, the scope of this massive recall could be even wider.

Already, Hill's Pet Nutrition recalled its Prescription Diet m/d Feline dry cat food. The food included wheat gluten from the same supplier that Menu Foods used. The recall doesn't involve any other Prescription Diet or Science Diet products, the company said.

"I just knew this was going to happen," one worried pet owner wrote on the PetConnection.com blog in response to today's news. "This is awful, just awful. Our poor beloved pets. They just don't stand a chance ... "

The FDA isn't sure how melamine -- which is used as fertilizer in Asia -- would have poisoned pets, said Stephen F. Sundlof, director of the FDA's Center for Veterinary Medicine.

He said the contaminated wheat gluten was shipped to an unnamed company that manufactures dry pet food.

Only wet "cuts and gravy" style-pets food are involved in the Menu Foods recall.

The FDA is now investigating whether the melamine-tainted wheat gluten -- also imported from China --- was used to make any dry pet foods.

When asked if pet owners could be feeding unsafe food to their animals, Sundlof said: "It is possible, but I think we've been following every lead that we can. My sense is that we have gotten most of it under control."

Last week, New York officials announced they discovered the toxin aminopterin -- used as rat poison in other countries and as a cancer drug in the United States -- in Menu's contaminated products.

But the FDA said its tests -- and those by the outside lab -- did not reveal the rat poisoning in the recalled pet food. Or in the wheat gluten.

Cornell University officials, however, now confirm they found melamine in the urine and kidney of a sick cat. New York officials say they've detected that chemical, too.

Menu Foods has confirmed its recalled containers of pet food -- distributed throughout North America under 95 brands -- were made with wheat gluten from a new supplier.

But the company said it stopped using that supplier after cats and dogs that ate the its food showed signs of kidney failure or died.

Findings Support ASPCA

Today's announcement by the FDA supports findings released earlier this week by The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (ASPCA).

The animal rights group said data its veterinary toxicologists have analyzed indicated other contaminants might be involved in the tainted pet foods.

"Clinical signs reported in cats affected by the contaminated foods are not fully consistent with the ingestion of rat poison containing aminopterin that, according to Menu Foods, is at the 'root' of the contamination issue," the ASPCA said on March 27, 2007.

Dr. Steven Hansen, veterinary toxicologist and senior vice president with the ASPCA, added: "We've seen reports coming in from all around the country that animals that were eating the contaminated foods are definitely suffering from renal failure. But the data that we've been collecting do not conclusively prove this connection, which is why we strongly recommend that those involved in the investigation continue to search for additional contaminants."

Dr. Hansen said animals poisoned with aminopterin should have additional symptoms.

"To be consistent with the effects of aminopterin, we should also be seeing a significant number of affected pets showing the accompanying signs of severe intestinal damage, as well as bone marrow suppression, including 'leukopenia,' which is a serious reduction in white blood cells," he said. "This is the missing connection ... there are so many inconsistencies in the purported link between aminopterin and the animals affected that we urge veterinary toxicologists and veterinary pathologists at diagnostic laboratories to continue looking for additional contaminants.

"Only continued rigorous testing will uncover the real reason or reasons for this crisis among our pet population."

The FDA confirmed 16 cats and dogs have died after eating Menu's contaminated food, but it expects that number to dramatically increase. The governmental agency has received more than 8,000 complaints from pet owners and veterinarians, and is testing hundreds of customer-submitted samples.

The contamination appears to be more deadly to cats than dogs, the FDA's Sundlof said.

Earlier this week, the Veterinarians Information Network, a Web site of 30,000 veterinarians and veterinary students, announced its members have reported 104 deaths linked to Menu Foods' contaminated pet food.

The majority of those deaths -- 88 -- involved cats.

The Web site also received 11 reports of dogs dying after eating Menu Foods' tainted products. The remaining five deaths did not list a species.

In addition, VIN said its members have seen 471 cases of kidney failure since Menu Foods announced its massive recall on March 16, 2007.

The Web site PetConnection.com says it has -- as of March 30, 2007 -- received 2,400 unconfirmed reports of dog and cat deaths linked to Menu Foods.

As the investigation continues, pet owners are advised to watch their dogs and cats for symptoms of kidney failure, including loss of appetite, lethargy, vomiting, excessive drinking and either excessive or no urination.

Veterinarians, however, warn that animals do not show symptoms until about 70 percent of the kidney function is lost.

A complete list of the recalled pet foods is available at Menu Food's Web site: www.menufoods.com/recall or contact the company at (866) 463-6738 or (866) 895-2708.



FDA Confirms It Found Plastic in Tainted Pet Food...

FDA Finds Plastic in Tainted Pet Food

U.S. Food and Drug Administration testing found a chemical commonly used in plastics, but no rat poison, in the recalled pet food that has killed and sickened cats and dogs nationwide, the agency said today.

As the FDA was announcing its findings, the animal-rights organization PETA called on the agency to immediately expand the pet food recall to include all dry varieties subject to complaints until they are chemically tested for safety.

PETA will also wants the FDA to investigate Iams in order to find out if the company knew about the contaminated food before calling for a recall.

"Nearly a month elapsed between the first reports of illness and death from contaminated products and the recall -- time during which countless cats and dogs may have been sickened and died," says PETA Vice President Bruce Friedrich. "We?re calling on Iams and other companies not to gamble with animals' lives and to recall all dry food products that are the subject of complaints immediately."

Testing by the FDA and at least one lab independent of the agency found melamine, a chemical used in plastics and household textiles, in samples of the recalled pet food and in one of its ingredients -- wheat gluten, said Stephen F. Sundlof, director of the FDA's Center for Veterinary Medicine.

Cornell University scientists say they have also found the chemical, sometimes used as a fertilizer, in the urine of sick cats, as well as in the kidney of one cat that died after eating the company's wet food.

The FDA now says it has received 8,000 complaints regarding the recalled food and is testing hundreds of customer-submitted samples. Menu Foods recalled 60 million containers of cat and dog food earlier this month after animals died of kidney failure after eating the Canadian company's products.

PETA charged that Iams has "a history of causing animal suffering."

"During a 2002 to 2003 undercover investigation of an animal-testing laboratory contracted by Iams, a PETA investigator documented that terrified animals were confined to cramped, unsanitary cages in dilapidated rooms; that dogs had chunks of muscle cut from their thighs; and other acts of cruelty," PETA said.

Rat Poison

There had been earlier expressions of doubt that aminopterin was the sole cause of the wave of pet poisonings.

The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (ASPCA) isn't so sure. Based on data its veterinary toxicologists have analyzed, the animal rights group suspects other contaminants might be involved.

"Clinical signs reported in cats affected by the contaminated foods are not fully consistent with the ingestion of rat poison containing aminopterin that, according to Menu Foods, is at the 'root' of the contamination issue," the ASPCA stated in a release issued March 27, 2007.

"We've seen reports coming in from all around the country that animals that were eating the contaminated foods are definitely suffering from renal failure," said Dr. Steven Hansen, veterinary toxicologist and senior vice president with the ASPCA. "But the data that we've been collecting do not conclusively prove this connection, which is why we strongly recommend that those involved in the investigation continue to search for additional contaminants."

Dr. Hansen says animals poisoned with aminopterin -- which is used to treat humans with cancer -- should have additional symptoms.

"To be consistent with the effects of aminopterin, we should also be seeing a significant number of affected pets showing the accompanying signs of severe intestinal damage, as well as bone marrow suppression, including 'leukopenia,' which is a serious reduction in white blood cells," he says. "This is the missing connection that we want to alert veterinarians around the country to.

He adds: "There are so many inconsistencies in the purported link between aminopterin and the animals affected, that we urge veterinary toxicologists and veterinary pathologists at diagnostic laboratories to continue looking for additional contaminants. Only continued rigorous testing will uncover the real reason or reasons for this crisis among our pet population."



FDA Finds Plastic in Tainted Pet Food...

Reports of Dog, Cat Deaths Continue to Rise

Reports of illnesses and deaths linked to Menu Foods' tainted dog and cat food continue to rise nationwide -- far more than the 16 confirmed cases reported by the Federal Drug Administration -- while some scientists question the widely reported findings that rat poisoning may be to blame for the outbreak.

The Veterinarians Information Network, a Web site of 30,000 veterinarians and veterinary students, says its members have reported 471 cases of kidney failure in the 12 days since Menu Foods of Canada recalled 60 million containers of "cuts and gravy" style cat and dog foods tainted with rat poisoning.

More than 95 brands -- sold throughout North America under store and private labels -- are involved in the massive recall.

"The 16 (cases) the FDA confirms is barely the tip of the iceberg," the network's co-founder, veterinarian Paul Pion, told The Los Angeles Times. "There will be much more than this."

Pion says veterinarians have reported 104 deaths linked to Menu Foods' contaminated pet food. The majority of those deaths -- 88 -- involved cats. The Web site has also received 11 reports of dogs dying after eating Menu Foods' products. The remaining deaths did not list a species.

Veterinarians also reported that 59 pets have survived illnesses linked to the recalled food and 129 animals are still undergoing treatment.

The Web site PetConnection.com says that -- as of March 27, 2007 -- it had received nearly 2,000 reports of pets dying after eating Menu's contaminated food. Those reports came from pet owners and are not confirmed cases.

Rat Poison

Scientists have identified the contamination in Menu's dog and cat foods as a rat poison called aminopterin. The company is investigating how that toxin got into its food supply, but the FDA suspects the culprit might be the wheat gluten Menu imports from China.

But is rat poisoning the real cause for these pets' illnesses and death?

The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (ASPCA) isn't so sure. Based on data its veterinary toxicologists have analyzed, the animal rights group suspects other contaminants might be involved.

"Clinical signs reported in cats affected by the contaminated foods are not fully consistent with the ingestion of rat poison containing aminopterin that, according to Menu Foods, is at the 'root' of the contamination issue," the ASPCA stated in a release issued March 27, 2007.

"We've seen reports coming in from all around the country that animals that were eating the contaminated foods are definitely suffering from renal failure," said Dr. Steven Hansen, veterinary toxicologist and senior vice president with the ASPCA. "But the data that we've been collecting do not conclusively prove this connection, which is why we strongly recommend that those involved in the investigation continue to search for additional contaminants."

Dr. Hansen says animals poisoned with aminopterin -- which is used to treat humans with cancer -- should have additional symptoms.

"To be consistent with the effects of aminopterin, we should also be seeing a significant number of affected pets showing the accompanying signs of severe intestinal damage, as well as bone marrow suppression, including 'leukopenia,' which is a serious reduction in white blood cells," he says. "This is the missing connection that we want to alert veterinarians around the country to.

He adds: "There are so many inconsistencies in the purported link between aminopterin and the animals affected, that we urge veterinary toxicologists and veterinary pathologists at diagnostic laboratories to continue looking for additional contaminants. Only continued rigorous testing will uncover the real reason or reasons for this crisis among our pet population."

Pet Owners' Stories

The widespread reports of illness and death among cats and dogs mirror the complaints ConsumerAffairs.com has received from pets owners across the country, who says their dogs or cats became sick or died after eating Menu Foods tainted products.

"My cat, Murphy has been in the hospital for three days now," says Victoria Olsen of Federal Way, WA., "He experienced the same symptoms as the cats I have read about. He quit eating, drank water to excess, and was always in the litter box."

This is a cat, she says, that nearly died two years ago.

"He survived being caught for 28 days in a neighbor's animal trap. He suffered a crushed hind leg, lost more than half of his body weight, and still managed to drag himself home. It took awhile, but he came back and was back to normal.

"Now, after eating contaminated Authority brand pet food, he has lost all of the weight he gained back and is in renal failure."

A cat owner in Texas says her pet is also battling kidney problems. And she blames the sudden illness on Menu Foods.

"My cat, Munchie, has become very ill with kidney failure after eating Special Kitty, one of the foods listed on the pet food recall," says Ann, of Springs, Texas. "She has always been a healthy cat, who we loving referred to as 'fat cat.' Now my 'fat cat' is a skinny cat who is in the animal hospital trying to get well ... the vet say she will need to be on a special diet, with medications, for the rest of her life."

Deaths Reported

We've also received complaints about pets dying after eating Menu Foods' products.

"I had been feeding my cat the pouches of Special Kitty sold at Wal-Mart (and included in the recall)," says Vickie S. of Clifton Forge, VA. "My cat seemed to go downhill very rapidly. She stopped eating, drinking, and was very lethargic. By the time I was able to get her to the vet, she was in acute renal failure with complications in her pancreas and liver.

"The vet did not give a good prognosis for her recovery, and I had to make the decision to have her mercifully euthanized."

At the time, Menu Foods hadn't announced its recall.

The news shocked and devastated Vickie.

"I had been unknowingly poisoning my beloved pet the whole time," she says. "Due to this poisoning, vet bills of approximately $400.00 were incurred that would have otherwise been unnecessary and I would still have my loving companion."

A dog owner in Illinois says his "best friend" became gravely ill and had to be put to sleep after eating some of the tainted food.

"My dog was my child and has been with me for 13 plus years," says Dave O., of Lisle, Illinois. "The amount of pain I am going through for the loss of my best friend is indescribable."

Dave says he hopes his dog didn't die in vain.

"The void left is immeasurable, but we want to make sure that something good comes out of this ... be it more strict policies on food quality or money that can go to help other animals in need."

Other Brands?

Some pet owners also told us their dogs and cats became sick after eating other brands of pet food.

Their pets, they say, had symptoms similar to those who at the contaminated foods. And they now wonder if the recall should extend beyond Menu Foods.

"I use 22 ounce cans of Pedigree dog food and mix it in with my dog's dry food," says Jill C. of Minden, NV. "She was sick for approximately five to six days, lethargic, had diarrhea, and vomited a couple of times."

After a few days on dry food, her dog's condition improved.

"So I again mixed in some wet food and she threw it all up," Jill says. "I've stopped feeding her any canned Pedigree what-so-ever.

"My concern is 'how does anyone at this point know if it's just Menu Foods that has a problem?'"

Recall List

A complete list of the recalled pet foods is available on Menu Food's Web site: www.menufoods.com/recall or contact the company at (866) 463-6738 or (866) 895-2708.

Pet owners should immediately contact their veterinarians if they notice any signs of illness in their animals after eating the recalled foods, including loss of appetite, lethargy, vomiting, diarrhea, changes in water consumption, or changes in urination.


Reports of Dog, Cat Deaths Continue to Rise...

Menu Foods Wants All of its Wet Pet Food Removed from Shelves

Menu Foods is asking retailers to be sure they have removed all of the recalled pet food it manufactures under a dizzying variety of brands ... and then some.

Using language that's not likely to clear up any remaining confusion, the manufacturer issued a statement that read: "Menu Foods issued instructions for retailers to remove from their shelves all cuts and gravey products of the flavours listed on the recall list, regardless of the dates produced."

The Canadian manufacturer said it was aware of reports from the FDA and various media outlets that some recalled lots of "cuts and gravy" style wet pet food remain on store shelves and asked retailers to remove all varieties of the pet foods listed as www.menufoods.com, regardless of whether it is one of the recalled batches.

Menu Foods said it remains concerned that consumers are able to purchase recalled items.

There is no known risk from items not listed on the recall list but an abundance of caution is called for in this situation, the company said.

The President and CEO of Menu Foods said late Friday that his company still does not know how rodent poisoning got into its cat and dog foods, but assured worried pet owners there's "no reason to suspect this matter goes beyond the recalled product."

President Paul Henderson also said there's no reason to suspect anyone tampered with his company's pet food, which has been linked to the deaths of cats and dogs nationwide.

"The products (involved in the recall) are from two different facilities," he said of the plants in Emporia, Kansas and Pennsauken, New Jersey. Both plants are still making pet food. "The probability of someone tampering at both of those plants is remote."

Henderson said his company will continue testing to determine how the toxin -- identified by New York officials as Aminopterin -- got into its pet food. Aminopterin is a rat poison used in other countries, but not in the United States.

"We are happy and relieved that the experts from the New York State Department of Agriculture and Cornell University have discovered the root of the issue that has harmed North American cats and dogs," Henderson said.

Earlier reports suggested the poison may have been used on the wheat gluten the company imports from China. Henderson confirmed his company imports that product from China, but wouldn't say if it was the source of the poison.

All he would say was: "We have identified a correlation between a single ingredient and we stopped using it."

The Food and Drug Administration, however, has focused its investigation on that product. FDA officials say wheat gluten by itself would not cause kidney failure, but this common ingredient could have been contaminated

Since the company announced its recall of 60 million cans of "cut and gravy" style cat and dog food last week, Henderson said it has talked to nearly 200,000 worried pet owners.

"They were scared. Some, like myself, are angry. Our hearts go out to the many thousands of pet-owners across Canada and the U.S. for their losses and their worry."

One of those grieving pet owners attended Friday's press conference and asked Henderson how his company will compensate consumers for their veterinarian bills and other expenses.

"To the extent that we can identify the cause (of any illness or death) is from our food, we will take responsibility for that," Henderson said.

But is the company's pet food safe?

Henderson said his company has continued testing its product on animals.

"And there have been no adverse reactions from them."

Henderson said his company does not "admit negligence on our part" in connection with the poisoned pet food. He also declined to comment on the pending class action lawsuits filed against Menu Foods.

"Our primary concern is involved in the product recall and the investigation (of what caused the contamination)," he said. "The issue of litigation will follow in due course. Our focus is on pet safety."

Henderson said the recall will likely cost the company between $30 and $40 million. Will that trigger any lay-off or job cuts?

Henderson said it's premature to comment: "We'll make that decision when it's appropriate. We have a strong, sustainable business, and we're confident about the future."

In the meantime, Henderson said pet owners should immediately stop using any of the 95 brands of dog and cat food involved in the recall. Pet owners should also contact their veterinarian if their dogs or cats show any signs of illness after eating the recalled food.

Henderson said anyone who still has cans or pouches of the recalled food should return those products -- to the retailer where they purchased them -- for a full credit. "We'll then get those products from the retailers and destroy them ... according to FDA guidelines."

The recalled brands of pet food were sold throughout North America at Wal-Mart, Kroger, Safeway and other large retailers. Some of the recalled foods were sold under private labels like Iams, Nutro and Eukanuba.

A complete list of the recalled pet foods is available on Menu Food's Web site: www.menufoods.com/recall or contact the company at (866) 463-6738 or (866) 895-2708.

Menu Foods Wants All of its Wet Pet Food Removed from Shelves...

Article Image

Pet Food Recall Hits Home

By Lisa Wade McCormick
ConsumerAffairs.com

EMPORIA, Kan., March 26, 2007 -- What kind of people could make pet food that kills cats and dogs?

Welcome to Emporia
The Menu Foods Plant
People just like you and me, it turns out. The pet food that's blamed for the deaths of least 16 dogs and cats nationwide came from Menu Foods production plants in Emporia, Kansas, and Pennsauken, New Jersey, where employees are just as puzzled and concerned as everyone else.

In Emporia, a town of about 30,000 located 120 miles southwest of Kansas City on Interstate 35, Menu Foods is known for its high standards and demand for excellence.

It's a company that has pumped 476 good-paying jobs into this primarily blue-collar community in the past ten years. And one townspeople describe it as an "excellent community citizen" with "caring employees."

"This is unbelievable and doesn't make any sense," former Mayor Evora Wheeler says when asked about Menu Foods' production of dog and cat food tainted with rat poison.

The Emporia plant only makes the "cuts and gravy" style of pet food involved in the nationwide recall of 60 million cans and pouches of dog and cat food-sold under 95 different brands.

Canadian-based Menu Foods announced the massive recall on March 16, 2007, after pets that ate the company's food became ill or died.

"There has to be another explanation," Wheeler says of the contamination. "This is a fine company and I am confident they did not know an ingredient they were using was contaminated."

Wheeler and other townspeople ConsumerAffairs.com interviewed during a recent trip to Emporia are also confident that none of Menu Foods' employees are responsible for the contaminated pet food.

"It's somewhat insulting -- and a slam to our community -- when people talk about tampering," Wheeler says.

Jeff Longbine, chairman of the Regional Development Association, agrees.

"The thing that people don't see is the management and employees of Menu Foods. They're all good people. These are people who are our neighbors, our kids go to school with their kids, or we go to the same church.

"For this to have happened is devastating to them," he says. "And there is deep concern within this community for Menu Foods and its employees."

There's also tremendous concern for the scores of grieving pet owners across the country.

"My heart goes out to those pet owners," Wheeler says. "And I am confident that Menu Foods will do everything it can to correct this negative situation."

Jeanine McKenna, president and CEO of the Emporia Area Chamber of Commerce, agreed: "We are all saddened by this. This is something that effects us all ... we're all animal lovers.

"I can understand why people are angry (at Menu Foods)," McKenna adds. "Their pets are their family members. But at the same time, these are employees who pride themselves in doing quality work. And they're just as devastated by this."

Rat Poison

New York investigators last week identified the source of the contamination in Menu's pet food as a toxin called aminopterin.

That's a rat poison widely used in other countries, but not in the United States.

"I was glad when I heard that (the contamination) wasn't anything in Menu's processing ... that it was something from an outside vendor," Longbine says. "I knew Menu Foods was too good of a company to take any short-cuts."

Menu Foods President and CEO, Paul Henderson, said last Friday that he doesn't know how the rat poison entered his company's food supply.

Earlier reports suggested the toxin may have been used on the wheat gluten Menu Foods imports from China -- or sprayed in the storage containers that transport the product overseas.

The Food and Drug Administration has focused its investigation on wheat gluten, which is commonly used in pet foods as a thickening agent and source of protein.

Plant Idle

As that investigation continues, Menu Foods' production plant in Emporia stands idle -- at least for now. The company announced a two-to-four-day shut down on March 23, 2007, in response to the recall.

That recall, that company says, is likely to cost between $30-$40 million. Menu Foods also faces at least three pending lawsuits filed in response to the contamination.

What does this mean for Menu's future in Emporia?

"I can tell you everybody is concerned," says Mayor Jim Kessler. "Menu Foods has been a success story here in Emporia as far as our economic development. And there's concern that this might affect the employment base here. But everybody hopes that Menu Foods will come through all this."

The company has vowed there will be no layoffs.

"There is absolutely zero impact on employment," The Emporia Gazette quoted a Menu Foods spokesman as saying. "The company has certainly been challenged by what has been one of the biggest recalls in consumer history, but our consumers are loyal, the company is strong and business is moving forward."

The home of fabled journalist and Progressivist William Allen White, Emporia had been down on its luck in the 1990s. In What's the Matter with Kansas? (2004), historian Thomas Frank portrayed Emporia as a shuttered, dried-up ghost of its former self, and blamed conservative economic policies for its decline.

Emporia's boosters say Frank went a little too far but beneath their Midwestern pride and optimism, there's a sense of concern for what the latest food-chain disaster means for Menu Foods and American agriculture.

Lifelong Emporia resident Jesse Solis remains optimistic, saying the key to Menu's future is its loyal customer base.

"And I think people will stick by this company. I'm a pet owner and I feed my dog Menu Foods. I will continue to feed him Menu Foods, and recommend it to other pet owners I know."

So will Longbine.

"I feed my dog Menu Foods and will continue to give it her," he says. "And I hope other people -- and Wal-Mart, Safeway, and other retailers -- will continue to buy the company's products.

"I think Menu Foods is strong enough to survive this."



Pet Food Recall Hits Home...

Menu Food CEO "Doesn't Know" How Rat Poison Got into Pet Food

By Lisa Wade McCormick
ConsumerAffairs.com

March 23, 2007
The President and CEO of Menu Foods said late Friday that his company still does not know how rodent poisoning got into its cat and dog foods, but assured worried pet owners there's "no reason to suspect this matter goes beyond the recalled product."

President Paul Henderson also said there's no reason to suspect anyone tampered with his company's pet food, which has been linked to the deaths of at least 16 cats and dogs nationwide.

"The products (involved in the recall) are from two different facilities," he said of the plants in Emporia, Kansas and Pennsauken, New Jersey. Both plants are still making pet food. "The probability of someone tampering at both of those plants is remote."

Henderson said his company will continue testing to determine how the toxin -- identified by New York officials as Aminopterin -- got into its pet food. Aminopterin is a rat poison used in other countries, but not in the United States.

"We are happy and relieved that the experts from the New York State Department of Agriculture and Cornell University have discovered the root of the issue that has harmed North American cats and dogs," Henderson said.

Earlier reports suggested the poison may have been used on the wheat gluten the company imports from China. Henderson confirmed his company imports that product from China, but wouldn't say if it was the source of the poison.

All he would say was: "We have identified a correlation between a single ingredient and we stopped using it."

The Food and Drug Administration, however, has focused its investigation on that product. FDA officials say wheat gluten by itself would not cause kidney failure, but this common ingredient could have been contaminated

Since the company announced its recall of 60 million cans of "cut and gravy" style cat and dog food last week, Henderson said it has talked to nearly 200,000 worried pet owners.

"They were scared. Some, like myself, are angry. Our hearts go out to the many thousands of pet-owners across Canada and the U.S. for their losses and their worry."

One of those grieving pet owners attended Friday's press conference and asked Henderson how his company will compensate consumers for their veterinarian bills and other expenses.

"To the extent that we can identify the cause (of any illness or death) is from our food, we will take responsibility for that," Henderson said.

But is the company's pet food safe?

Henderson said his company has continued testing its product on animals.

"And there have been no adverse reactions from them."

Henderson said his company does not "admit negligence on our part" in connection with the poisoned pet food. He also declined to comment on the pending class action lawsuits filed against Menu Foods.

"Our primary concern is involved in the product recall and the investigation (of what caused the contamination)," he said. "The issue of litigation will follow in due course. Our focus is on pet safety."

Henderson said the recall will likely cost the company between $30 and $40 million. Will that trigger any lay-off or job cuts?

Henderson said it's premature to comment: "We'll make that decision when it's appropriate. We have a strong, sustainable business, and we're confident about the future."

In the meantime, Henderson said pet owners should immediately stop using any of the 95 brands of dog and cat food involved in the recall. Pet owners should also contact their veterinarian if their dogs or cats show any signs of illness after eating the recalled food.

Henderson said anyone who still has cans or pouches of the recalled food should return those products -- to the retailer where they purchased them -- for a full credit. "We'll then get those products from the retailers and destroy them ... according to FDA guidelines."

The recalled brands of pet food were sold throughout North America at Wal-Mart, Kroger, Safeway and other large retailers. Some of the recalled foods were sold under private labels like Iams, Nutro and Eukanuba.

A complete list of the recalled pet foods is available on Menu Food's Web site: www.menufoods.com/recall or contact the company at (866) 463-6738 or (866) 895-2708.

Menu Food CEO 'Doesn't Know' How Rat Poison Got into Pet Food...

Article Image

Pet Food Contamination May Be Rat Poison

Could it be rat poison that's killing the nation's dogs and cats?

That's the conclusion of the New York Department of Agriculture and Markets, which announced today that the recalled Menu Food pet foods contained rodent poison.

State Agriculture Commissioner Patrick Hook identified the toxin as Aminopterin, which is used to kill rats in some countries. The poison is not registered as rodent killer in the United States, although it is used as a cancer drug.

According to a report by MSNBC, the poison may have been used on wheat imported from China.

The Food and Drug Administration has focused its investigation on wheat gluten in the pet food, which is blamed for causing kidney problems in dogs and cats across the country and the deaths of at least 16 pets -- although officials expect that number to rise.

The FDA says wheat gluten by itself would not cause kidney failure, but the common ingredient could have been contaminated.

New York officials aren't sure how the rodent poison got into the recalled pet food. But they apparently don't believe it was deliberate.

The New York Attorney General Office says it's not aware of any criminal investigation involving the tainted food. And FBI spokesman Paul Holstein in Albany said Friday that he was not aware of any FBI involvement in the case.

"I don't know where we'll go from here," he said.

Menu Foods of Canada announced its massive recall on March 16, 2007, after receiving complaints of kidney failure in pets that ate the food.

The recall involves 60 million cans of "cut and gravy" style cat and dog food -- sold across North America under 95 brand names. Those brands are carried by Wal-Mart, Kroger, Safeway and other large retailers -- and also sold under other private labels like Iams, Nutro and Eukanuba.

A complete list of the recalled pet foods is available on Menu Food's Web site: www.menufoods.com/recall The company has also set up two phone numbers pet owners can call for more information: (866) 463-6738 and (866) 895-2708.

Pet Owners Haunted

A Manchester, New Hampshire, woman is haunted by recurring guilt surrounding the recent death of her beloved cat, Lily.

Her 16-year-old Siamese-Domestic Shorthair became seriously ill -- and had to put to sleep last week -- after eating five cans of Iams Flakes cat food, one of the 95 brands of "cut and gravy" style cat and dog food involved in Menu Food of Canada's nationwide recall.

"If I'd just kept feeding her the pt cat food and not switched to the Iams Flakes of salmon and tuna, then she'd still be around," says Lily's grieving owner, Deborah J. "But when I saw the cans of salmon and tuna, I thought she might like a change."

Deborah says her "best friend" was in good health before she became ill after eating the contaminated cat food on March 8, 2007.

"She was an active, healthy cat. But after I fed her the Iams salmon and tuna, she threw up and started going downhill. She stopped eating and starting hiding. We took her to the vet and learned she was in renal failure." Deborah says her veterinarian gave Lily IV fluids for four days, but the cat's condition continued to deteriorate.

"When our vet re-tested Lily's blood, her toxicity levels were still off the chart," she says. "He told me Lily was not going to pull through. That's when we both made the decision to put her to sleep. It was a horrible decision to make. I loved that cat so much. I'd had her since college."

Deborah's veterinarian put Lily to sleep on March 16, 2007.

The next day, Deborah learned about Menu Food's recall of 60 million cans of wet cat and dog food. She checked the food she'd given Lily and made a shocking discovery.

"When I looked at the cans of food I'd fed to Lily -- and the product codes of the cans being recalled -- I realized they were the same numbers. I thought 'Oh my gosh, these are the same ones.'"

The discovery also made Deborah worry about the safety of her other three cats, who had also eaten some of the tainted food.

"I was very concerned and we had all of them tested," she says. "And they're all OK." Deborah says she's not only had to deal with the emotional pain of losing Lily, whom she describes as "a very special cat."

Lily's death -- and the circumstances surrounding it -- also caused a financial strain on Deborah's family.

"Our vet bills are now close to $700 because we had to pay for all of Lily's care and the testing of our other cats," she says. "I think someone should reimburse people for their veterinarian bills. For those of us who have lost a pet, nothing can be done to bring them back . . . but someone should help people recoup the cost of their vet bills."



Pet Food Contamination May Be Rat Poison...

One in Six Animals Died in Pet Food Tests


Federal investigators say as many as one in six animals died in tests of suspect dog and cat food by the manufacturer after complaints the products were poisoning pets around the country, as consumers wonder if their pet will be next.

Federal investigators say they're focused on gluten -- a protein source commonly used as filler -- as the most likely source of contamination in the 60 million cans and pouches recalled late last week.

The recalled wet-style dog and cat food was made by Menu Foods, based in Ontario, Canada. The company said it began receiving complaints of kidney failure and deaths around Feb. 20 and began running tests Feb. 27. During those tests, the company said it fed its products to 40 to 50 dogs and cats. Seven of them died. The company said the toxin appeared more deadly to cats.

As usual in cases involving contaminated food, many possible victims are already dead and buried, making it difficult for pet owners to be sure what killed their animals.

"Between January 10 and 20, I lost two rabbit beagles and on Feb. 10, I lost a lab," said Lionel of Buckhannon, W. Va. "They quit eating and drinking and became dehydrated and died within a week."

"My neighbor ran up a $300 vet bill. The vet had no idea what was happening," Lionel said. He said his dogs had eaten Big Red, one of the recalled brands.

John of El Dorado, Calif., had a similar experience. "Our dog recently died from acute renal failure, she was in good health and only 10 years old," he told ConsumerAffairs.com.

The FDA has not yet counted how many reports it has received of dead and sickened animals. The company says it has reports of 10 deaths, nine cats and one dog.

Recall Details

The recall covers dog food sold throughout North America under 51 brands and cat food sold under 40 brands, including Iams, Nutro and Eukanuba.

The recalled food was also sold under many store names, including Wal-Mart, Kroger and Safeway.

The recall covers dog and cat food manufactured between December 3, 2006 and March 6, 2007. The recall is limited to "cuts and gravy" style pet food in cans and pouches manufactured at two of the company's United States facilities.

Here is a complete list of the recalled brands of dog and cat food. Pet owners should read it carefully. The company has established a hot-line for customer inquiries: 1-866-895-2708.

Dog Food

Cat Food

  • Americas Choice, Preferred Pets
  • Authority
  • Award
  • Best Choice
  • Big Bet
  • Big Red
  • Bloom
  • Wegmans Bruiser
  • Cadillac
  • Companion
  • Demoulas Market Basket
  • Eukanuba
  • Food Lion
  • Giant Companion
  • Great Choice
  • Hannaford
  • Hill Country Fare
  • Hy-Vee
  • Iams
  • Laura Lynn
  • Loving Meals
  • Meijers Main Choice
  • Mighty Dog Pouch
  • Mixables
  • Nutriplan
  • Nutro Max
  • Nutro Natural Choice
  • Nutro Ultra
  • Nutro
  • Ol'Roy Canada
  • Ol'Roy US
  • Paws
  • Pet Essentials
  • Pet Pride - Good n Meaty
  • Presidents Choice
  • Price Chopper
  • Priority Canada
  • Priority US
  • Publix
  • Roche Brothers
  • Save-A-Lot
  • Schnucks
  • Shep Dog
  • Springsfield Prize
  • Sprout
  • Stater Brothers
  • Weis Total Pet
  • Western Family US
  • White Rose
  • Winn Dixie
  • Your Pet
  • Americas Choice, Preferred Pets
  • Authority
  • Best Choice
  • Companion
  • Compliments
  • Demoulas Market Basket
  • Eukanuba
  • Fine Feline Cat
  • Food Lion
  • Foodtown
  • Giant Companion
  • Hannaford
  • Hill Country Fare
  • Hy-Vee
  • Iams
  • Laura Lynn
  • Li'l Red
  • Loving Meals
  • Meijer's Main Choice
  • Nutriplan
  • Nutro Max Gourmet Classics
  • Nutro Natural Choice
  • Paws
  • Pet Pride
  • Presidents Choice
  • Price Chopper
  • Priority US
  • Save-A-Lot
  • Schnucks
  • Science Diet Feline Savory Cuts Cans
  • Sophistacat
  • Special Kitty Canada
  • Special Kitty US
  • Springfield Prize
  • Sprout
  • Stop & Shop Companion
  • Tops Companion
  • Wegmans
  • Weis Total Pet
  • Western Family US
  • White Rose
  • Winn Dixie
  • "We take these complaints very seriously and, while we are still looking for a specific cause, we are acting to err on the side of caution" said Paul K. Henderson, President and CEO, Menu Foods. "We will do whatever is necessary to ensure that our products maintain the very highest quality standards."



    One in Six Animals Died in Pet Food Tests...

    Pet Food Recalled After Reports Of Kidney Failure


    Humans aren't the only ones who have to worry about a tainted food supply. Canadian pet food manufacturer Menu Foods Income Fund says it is recalling 48 brands of dog food and 40 brands of cat food after reports of pets suffering kidney failure and at least 10 pet deaths.

    Among the affected brands are Iams, Eukanuba and Nutro.

    The company said it was initiating a precautionary recall of portion of the dog and cat food it manufactured between December 3, 2006 and March 6, 2007. The recall is limited to "cuts and gravy" style pet food in cans and pouches manufactured at two of the company's United States facilities. The products are both manufactured and sold under private-label and are contract-manufactured for some national brands.

    "Over the past several days, we have received feedback in the United States, raising concerns about pet food manufactured since early December, and its impact on the renal health of the pets consuming the products," the company said in a statement.

    Menu Foods says it began a battery of technical tests as soon as the first complaints came in, but has not identified any problems.

    They did find, however, that timing of the production associated with these complaints coincides with the introduction of an ingredient from a new supplier. The ingredient was dropped shortly after this discovery, the company said, and production since then has been undertaken using ingredients from another source.

    "We take these complaints very seriously and, while we are still looking for a specific cause, we are acting to err on the side of caution" said Paul K. Henderson, President and CEO, Menu Foods. "We will do whatever is necessary to ensure that our products maintain the very highest quality standards."

    In a scene reminiscent of the recent peanut butter salmonella scare, U.S. retailers frantically pulled the recalled products from store shelves.

    Pet owners are urged to carefully check the food they are using. Dog owners can check here and cat owners can check here.

    Pet Food Recalled After Reports Of Kidney Failure...

    Salmonella Found in "Wild Kitty" Cat Food

    The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is warning consumers not to purchase or use Wild Kitty Cat Food due to the presence of Salmonella, a pathogen.

    The FDA said that during routine monitoring activities, it collected and analyzed a sample of frozen raw Wild Kitty Cat Food and detected Salmonella in the product.

    Cats and other pets consuming this food may become infected with Salmonella. People can also become infected with Salmonella if they handle or ingest the cat food, touch pets that consumed the food, or touch any surfaces that came into contact with the food or pets.

    The specific products covered by this warning are Wild Kitty Raw All Natural, Frozen Cat Food Chicken with Clam Recipe, Net Wt. 3.5 oz (100g) and 1 lb in plastic containers. Some of these containers may be uncoded.

    Salmonella can cause serious illnesses in small children, frail or elderly people, and people and pets with weakened immune systems. Other people and pets may suffer short-term symptoms, such as high fever, severe headache, vomiting, nausea, abdominal pain, and diarrhea. Long term complications can include arthritis.

    The Wild Kitty Cat Food is sold nationwide to retail stores and through distributors and internet sales, nationwide.

    Consumers who have purchased this product should not feed it to their pets, but should instead dispose of it in a safe manner (e.g., in a securely covered trash receptacle).

    Anyone who is experiencing the symptoms of Salmonella infection after having handled the product should seek medical attention, and report use of the product and illness to FDA's Office of Emergency Operations. In addition, people who have concerns that they may have Salmonella should contact their medical doctors and the local health departments. People who have concerns whether their pet has Salmonella should contact their veterinarian.

    People may risk bacterial infection not only by handling their cat, but by contact with the pet food, food bowl, cat box and surfaces exposed to these items, so it is important that they thoroughly wash their hands with hot water and soap.

    Since young children, elderly people, and people and animals with weakened immune systems are particularly at risk from exposure, they should avoid handling all the items listed above and surfaces exposed to these items.



    Salmonella, Wild Kitty, Cat Food...

    Tainted Dog Food Still Killing Dogs

    The U.S. Food and Drug Administration reports that at least 76 dogs nationwide have died as a result of eating contaminated Diamond Pet Foods.

    According to the company, the pet food was distributed to stores in Alabama, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Mississippi, Michigan, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Tennessee, Vermont and Virginia and West Virginia.

    The tainted chow was sold under the brand names Diamond, Country Value and Professional, and bears the date codes of March 1, 2007, through June 11, 2007.

    Diamond has promised to reimburse pet owners for vet bills and other costs associated with the aflatoxin poisoning.

    "It's going to take some time to take care of all these customers, and we're going to do it," said the company's chief operating officer, Mark Brinkmann.

    The company has recalled 19 varieties of dog and cat food because tests showed high levels of aflatoxin, a naturally occurring toxic chemical that comes from a fungus found on corn and other grains that causes severe liver damage in animals.

    The company recalled products manufactured at its Gaston, SC, plant from September to November 2005. Based on tests, Diamond has narrowed down the exposure to food produced on Oct. 11.

    The FDA and the South Carolina Department of Agriculture have launched investigations.

    Tainted Dog Food Still Killing Dogs...

    Tainted Dog Food Kills 23 Animals


    The Food and Drug Administration reports contaminated pet food sold in 23 states killed almost two dozen animals and caused another 18 to become sick.

    The FDA has traced the deaths to pet food processed at the Diamond Pet Food Company in its Gaston, South Carolina, manufacturing plant.

    Diamond Pet Food issued a recall of 19 varieties of dog and cat food on December 21 because some of the pet food made at the Gaston plant was discovered to contain aflatoxin, which comes from a fungus sometimes found on corn and other crops

    Aflatoxin can cause severe liver damage.

    The recalled Diamond Pet food was sold in 23 states under the brand names Diamond, Country Value and Professional, and bears the date codes of March 1, 2007, through June 11, 2007.

    Consumers are warned to immediately stop using the product.

    In a December 20 press release, the company said it had notified distributors to hold up further sales of the pet food and a recall was issued the next day.

    The company is still attempting to isolate specific lot numbers that were contaminated and provide the information to distributors, retailers and consumers.

    The recalled pet food was distributed in Alabama, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Mississippi, Michigan, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Tennessee, West Virginia, Vermont, and Virginia.

    Tainted Dog Food Kills 23 Animals...

    Salmonella Fears Prompt Spice Recall

    August 28, 2005
    The U.S. Food and Drug Administration is advising processors and re-packers that Majestic International Spice Corporation of Montebello, CA, is voluntarily recalling its dried Extra Fancy Basil spice in 12.5 kilogram bags. The recall was initiated after FDA inspectors found the product contaminated with Salmonella Blockley.

    Salmonella is a well-known cause of both outbreaks and sporadic disease in various parts of the world and as such poses a potential health threat. FDA said it is issuing the advisory out of concern that the firm has not adequately alerted its consignees to the problem.

    The only identification on the 12.5 kilogram paper bags is a white paper label stating Extra Fancy Basil 12.5 KGS. The exact dates of sale are unknown but we believe the product was sold beginning in late April 2005.

    Salmonella is a microorganism that can cause serious and sometimes fatal infections in young children, frail or elderly people, and others with weakened immune systems. Healthy persons infected with Salmonella bacteria often experience fever, diarrhea (which may be bloody), nausea, vomiting and abdominal pain. In rare circumstances, infection with Salmonella can result in the microorganism getting into the bloodstream and producing more severe illnesses such as arterial infections, endocarditis and arthritis.

    No illnesses have been reported to date in connection with this problem.

    The contamination was noted after routine testing by FDA revealed the presence of Salmonella Blockley. The recall was the result of the FDA sampling. The company has ceased the distribution of the product in question.

    The agency said processors or repackers who received this product should discontinue using it and contact their local FDA office.



    Salmonella Fears Prompt Spice Recall...