Credit cards

This living topic provides a comprehensive overview of the complexities surrounding the use of credit cards, including the potential benefits and dangers. The content explores various credit card options, such as rewards cards, balance transfer cards, and cards tailored for specific demographics like students and those with poor credit. It also delves into the risks of high-interest rates, deferred interest traps, and the implications of increasing credit card debt amid economic shifts. Additionally, it highlights regulatory changes, consumer protection measures, and the impact of fintech innovations on credit card use. Through expert advice and real-world examples, the topic aims to help consumers make informed decisions and avoid common pitfalls in managing credit card debt.

Article Timeline

Newest
  • Newest
  • Oldest
Article Image

The one thing that you – as a consumer – keep getting wrong

Do the “7 Deadly Sins” apply to being a consumer? Yeah, in a way.

It's like gluttony and the overconsumption of goods, or pride when it comes to buying things solely to project a certain image or social status, neglecting actual need or value and exceeding what is truly needed or used. 

But let’s get out of the psychology of consumerism and think about the mistakes consumers make. The common pitfalls we all make are not comparing prices and features, falling prey to marketing tactics, not reading reviews and fine print, not negotiating or using available discounts and not taking advantage of return policies. 

Everyone can raise a hand on at least one of those, right?

But, the most important thing we tend to get wrong is leaving the accuracy of our credit reports to someone else. 

403,552 of you

In a new ConsumerAffairs review of complaints made to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB), the number of disputes about “incorrect information” in credit reports from TransUnion, Experian, and Equifax, rose from 200,273 in 2022 to 403,552 matches in 2023. 

And things are looking even sadder for 2024. So far – through Feb 26, 2024 – there have been 101,516 gripes filed about mistakes on consumers’ credit reports. At that rate, we could be looking down the barrel of more than 600,000 complaints by the end of this year.

All sorts of complaints

Credit reports have never been perfect, but with Americans buying things and taking out credit like crazy, more stuff is hitting the proverbial fan than ever before.

“The credit bureaus stated my [report] was properly investigated but how is that possible if the open date is inaccurate, the date last active is inaccurate, and the date last reported is not accurate,” complained one consumer.

Is it time for you to take another look at your credit reports?

If your credit score is decent – say above 600 – you probably don’t worry too much about what’s being reported.

But maybe you should. There are three frequent mistakes consumers make regarding their credit reports and with just a little effort, that 600’ish score could go up just enough to lower your credit card interest rate or your mortgage the next time you apply for one.

The most common mistakes on credit reports are:

  • Personal information mistakes: And this is quite a catch-all, too – anything from a misspelling of your name or address to an incorrect date of birth or your Social Security number. 

  • Account reporting errors: This is a more difficult can of worms because these involve inaccuracies related to individual accounts listed on your report, such as:

    • An account reported by someone as closed that might really be open, or vice versa.

    • Missed or late payments might be incorrectly reported, too, even if you made payments on time.

    • Incorrect credit limits, balances, or dates opened/closed can appear, as well.

  • Identity theft: Fraudulent accounts opened in your name are showing up more and more, so stay vigilant.

  • Duplicate accounts: Because of reporting inconsistencies between the credit bureaus, your account information might be listed multiple times on a report, so correct that, too.

Earn bonus points!

We’ve covered the basic mistakes consumers make with credit reports, but there are some reporting errors that you might find if you look a little deeper or you take care of them quicker.

The first one is not disputing errors promptly. The faster you dispute an error, the sooner it gets corrected and the sooner your credit score benefits. Leave a mistake on there too long and it’ll just make matters worse. 

Another is closing old accounts in good standing. Sometimes, we pay off credit cards and just leave things at that, but if we don’t close them completely, they still hang out there as active and can lower your score. 

Do the “7 Deadly Sins” apply to being a consumer? Yeah, in a way.It's like gluttony and the overconsumption of goods, or pride when it comes to buying...

Article Image

Capital One is buying Discover Financial Services

Capital One is acquiring Discover Financial Services, in a deal that would expand the footprint of both credit card companies.

While a smaller player among credit card customers, Discover has its own payment network, which could be one reason Capital One pursued the deal. In the announcement of the deal, Capital One said it would move some of its credit cards to the Discover network.

Capital One founder and CEO Richard Fairbank believes the acquisition will provide a successful synergy.

“Our acquisition of Discover is a singular opportunity to bring together two very successful companies with complementary capabilities and franchises, and to build a payments network that can compete with the largest payments networks and payments companies," Fairbank said. "Through this combination, we're creating a company that is exceptionally well-positioned to create significant value for consumers, small businesses, merchants, and shareholders as technology continues to transform the payments and banking marketplace."

Different terms

Capital One and Discover credit cards have different terms and the announcement did not say whether Discover’s terms will stay intact. Maggie, of Winona, Minn., is one Discover cardholder who hopes Discover stays pretty much the same.

“I often find myself feeling unsatisfied with a lot of customer service experiences from companies…but every time I’ve contacted Discover I’ve had an amazing experience, always so helpful and nice I love it,” Maggie wrote in a ConsumerAffairs review. “I always feel understood and valued everytime I call and they seem like they genuinely care about their customers rather than just being there to solve your problem and hang up.”

Capital One said it plans to keep the Discover brand for current Discover accounts. Although it’s the smallest credit card company, Discover has a global payments network with 70 million merchant acceptance points in more than 200 countries and territories. 

Capital One is acquiring Discover Financial Services, in a deal that would expand the footprint of both credit card companies.While a smaller player am...

Article Image

Can renters get the same credit score benefits as homeowners?

In 2023, first-time homebuyers drove home sales, led by millennials.

However, a number of people in that generation soon discovered that their money didn’t go nearly as far as it used to because of rising mortgage rates, which was the likely reason why more than 17 million millennials and 4.5 million Gen Z’ers decided to call a rental unit their home and lose out on the benefits of home ownership.

Specifically, they lost out on the benefit of raising their credit score by paying mortgages on time. But have they?

Since rents are rising faster than home prices, shouldn’t those people have the same advantage? That question is starting to surface. It’s not well-publicized – nor is it always easy – but it is doable. 

Not easy vs. doable

The “not easy” side is that currently, renters can’t submit their payments directly to the credit bureaus for one thing. For another, some landlords and property managers do not report rent payments to credit bureaus.

“However, renters have the option to avail themselves of several free and paid services that will report rent payments to the credit bureaus on their behalf,” Severine Bryan, founder of Bryan Financial Empowerment LLC, told ConsumerAffairs.

“Free services include Self which reports to all three bureaus. Renters do not have to go through their landlord to use Self. It does have a paid tier that includes reporting utility and phone payments to the bureaus but those additional payments only report to TransUnion.”

Bryan offered two other “free” suggestions:

  • Pinata, which only reports to TransUnion through this method,  but which landlords can use and report to all three bureaus.

  • PayYourRent is also free to tenants and reports to all three bureaus. But, landlords might shy away from this since they pay any fees charged by PayYourRent.

As for paid rental payment credit reporting services, there’s Boom Pay, RentReporters and Rental Kharma.

Paid services that report to all three bureaus include Boom Pay. Bryan says the beauty of Boom Pay is that for an additional small fee, it will capture and report up to 24 months of payments before signing up. Rental Kharma, on the other hand, only reports to TransUnion and Equifax.

“Before signing up for any of these services, tenants should verify which bureau they report to,” Bryan cautions.

“This is especially important if they are in the market for a loan and the loan servicer uses one bureau over the others. They should also verify if the loan servicer includes rent payments in their loan processes.”

A credit card solution?

Some credit experts poo-poo using credit cards to pay rent, but Sebastian Jania of Ontario Property Buyers suggests that one of the more atypical credit card benefits being offered is a way that renters can use their rental payments to up their credit score. 

Jania alerted ConsumerAffairs to Plastiq, a company that will pay the landlord on or before the day that rent is due, and the owner of the credit card will have that balance along with a small fee added to their credit card for payment the next month. 

“By doing this one is able to use a credit card and show the credit card company that they are able to use this card responsibly and have it paid every month which will result in improving their credit score over time,” Jania told us.

“Further, as the credit card company sees that they are making consistent payments, they may offer them additional credit products or an increase in credit limit which will reduce credit utilization and ultimately result in an increased credit score.”

In 2023, first-time homebuyers drove home sales, led by millennials.However, a number of people in that generation soon discovered that their money did...

Article Image

Fed signals rate cuts. What does that mean for your money?

It turns out Wall Street was right. Stocks rallied last month on the growing belief that not only was the Federal Reserve done hiking interest rates, it would cut rates next year.

At the conclusion of the Fed’s December meeting, members of the Fed’s Open Market Committee (FMOC) released projections for 2024. Most penciled in three cuts in the federal funds rate, which determines interest rates on car loans, credit cards and banks’ prime lending rates.

Not surprisingly, stocks surged with the Dow Jones Industrial Average closing up 512 points, or 1.2%.

What it means

Here’s what that does to the investment environment:

  • Savers will likely get less interest on their money. Yields on Treasury bonds fell on the news.

  • Tech stocks, which led the November rally, gained even more.

  • Oil prices rose after finishing the previous day at their lowest level since June.

  • The price of gold, which had fallen over the last couple of weeks, posted a solid gain.

But it may be too soon for investors to make significant moves based on the Fed’s outlook. Oliver Rust, head of Product at Truflation, says the outlook is far from certain.

“With the labor market still running exceptionally hot and Truflation forecasting inflation will rise again in December, we expect policymakers will have to review their position and consider whether they need to increase rates again,” Rust told ConsumerAffairs.

There are still Fed ‘hawks’

“This would be a shock to the market, which is now overwhelmingly expecting the Fed’s next move to be an interest rate cut – though the majority now expect this to happen in May, rather than March. However, the market may be underestimating the extent of Fed Chair Jerome Powell’s hawkish stance.”

Rust also notes two of the incoming FOMC members next year also have hawkish views on monetary policy.

“This could further sway the committee toward another interest rate hike, should economic data suggest this is required,” he said. 

"In short, we are not seeing the economic slowdown required to bring inflation fully under control, which remains a core part of the Fed’s mandate. We expect Chairman Powell to remain firmly committed to this goal in 2024. If he does not see the necessary softening in the economic data in the new year, we believe he may still push for another 0.25% interest rate hike – and perhaps gain more support from his committee than he would have done this month.”

Generally, higher interest rates are a negative drag on stocks since they increase companies’ operating costs and can drag down profits.

It turns out Wall Street was right. Stocks rallied last month on the growing belief that not only was the Federal Reserve done hiking interest rates, it wo...

Article Image

Auto loans and credit cards may remain expensive for a while

The Federal Reserve Open Market Committee (Fed) ended its September meeting without increasing the federal funds rate but made clear its battle with inflation isn’t over.

“We want to see convincing evidence really that we have reached the appropriate level, and we’re seeing progress and we welcome that. But, you know, we need to see more progress before we’ll be willing to reach that conclusion,” said Fed Chairman Jerome Powell.

Other statements and documents suggest that even if the Fed doesn’t raise rates one more time, as expected, the policymakers plan to keep the rate where it is for months, making it more expensive to finance a car or truck purchase and pay down credit card balances.

Oliver Rust, head of product at independent inflation data aggregator Truflation, says the Fed’s decision shows it is being cautious.

“Overall, the economic picture remains murky, which explains the decision to pause,” Rust told ConsumerAffairs. “According to Powell, the Fed is now ‘in a position to be more careful’ and getting ‘fairly close’ to where it needs to be on interest rates. Faced with arguably the most important monetary policy decision since the rate hiking cycle began, this pause gives policymakers the chance to avoid a blunder, with Powell saying that achieving a soft landing still remains the Fed's primary objective.”

A soft landing would be a reduction in inflation without triggering a recession – historically, something hard to achieve.

Soft landing?

“However, with the economy on a strong path and unemployment stuck at historic lows, there is little chance of avoiding another interest rate hike,” Rust said. “At Truflation, we also expect inflation to remain sticky this year and maintain our projection of 4% CPI by year-end, which will put further pressure on the Fed.”

With new and used car prices expected to rise because of the United Auto Workers strike, higher financing rates may limit the kind of vehicles consumers can afford. Current rates range from 5.5% to over 28%.

The average credit card interest rate is 24.45%, with consumers with excellent credit paying less but those with poor credit paying a much higher rate. Both auto loan rates and credit card rates are based on the Fed’s federal funds rate.

The Federal Reserve Open Market Committee (Fed) ended its September meeting without increasing the federal funds rate but made clear its battle with inflat...

Article Image

Medical credit cards draw consumer group's scrutiny

Medical bills are the source of many consumer issues these days. They can lead to bankruptcy and ruin someone’s credit rating if they’re not paid.

Following up on its report “Medical Bills: Everything You Need to Know About Your Rights,” the U.S. PIRG Education Fund is warning consumers that the next time they’re faced with a hefty medical bill, they might find themselves pressured to sign up for a medical credit card. PIRG claims those cards are a win for the financial industry, benefiting from the millions of people who use those cards, but often a loss for the consumer.

PIRG’s latest report – “A bad deal: Why you don't want medical credit cards in your hand” – explains how medical credit cards work, why they add to the cost of a medical bill, and some alternative methods consumers can take to lower and pay off their medical bills. 

What are medical credit cards? 

A “normal” credit card and a “medical" credit card are kin, but they differ in an attractive way: deferred interest with 0% for an introductory period. And that angle is what companies pitch to consumers. 

The problem is that patients may not understand that “deferred interest” means that if they miss a payment, or can’t pay the full balance when it’s due, they’ll have to pay higher interest rates than most regular credit cards. 

According to the report, there's plenty of consumer-side pain. For one, there are loopholes in debt protection laws these cards can exploit.

Secondly, because they’re marketed inside of a healthcare office, the staffers who promote these aren’t prepared to fully explain or answer questions about the financial transaction. 

Thirdly, PIRG says consumers are powerless to keep these wolves keep away from your door. “The predatory terms of these financial products exacerbate the cost to the patient down the road. Patients need to know that they have other solutions available to them,” said U.S. PIRG Senior Director of Health Care Campaigns Patricia Kelmar. 

Listen to the advice of those who got hurt by a medical credit card

If you want proof, Evelina of El Cerrito Calif., has plenty in her review of Synchrony Financial’s CareCredit, the medical credit card she used to purchase her husband’s $5,400 hearing aids. 

Evelina’s not alone. In the 200 plus complaints about CareCredit to the CFPB, there are allegations of the company refusing to return overpayments, deceptive billing practices, and accounts closed without any explanation. 

CareCredit doesn’t have the market to itself. There's also AccessOne, PrimaHealth Credit, Wells Fargo Health Advantage, MedCredit Financial Services, and Comenity’s Alphaeon Credit Card. 

In response to this trend, several federal agencies have launched an inquiry into these high-cost specialty financial products, asking consumers to send in their stories. 

Consider the alternatives

PIRG says that there are four things consumers can do when they’re faced with a medical bill.

Verify your bill. Inside the ton of paperwork that you’ll get after a medical procedure, there should be an itemized list of what each thing costs. If you see something listed twice or a service that you didn’t receive or recognize, ask questions of both the provider and your insurance company.

Negotiate your bill. It doesn’t hurt to ask if you can get a discount and pay a lower amount, especially If you’ve been going to a doctor for a long time and they value you as a patient.

PIRG suggests that you can ask what the Medicare rate is and ask to pay that lower amount instead. “You should explain that you are willing to pay, but explain your financial limits,” PIRG suggests. “As with a payment plan, you should get the agreed-upon discount in writing.”

On top of referencing the Medicare rate, ConumerAffairs recently found an app that finds the cheapest price for medical procedures. You could use it to make more informed decisions when negotiating a price.

If it’s a non-profit hospital, ask about financial assistance. It’s a federal requirement for all nonprofit hospitals to have financial assistance policies, so if that’s where you’re getting your medical procedure done, ask if you qualify for free or discounted care. 

Despite the fact that the provider claims you have already been screened, PIRG says that you may still apply for this aid. “In some cases, financial aid is denied because the provider lacks the information necessary to know if you qualify, and your application can provide that missing information,” PIRG added.

Use another credit source. The first thing you shouldn’t do, says PIRG, is to even apply for one of these credit cards. In short, the credit card company “owns” you. They set the terms, conditions, and rate and you are pretty much powerless to affect any change. 

“We have to put an end to the peddling of medical credit cards in health care settings. When offered in a doctor’s office, or a hospital, patients might not be in the best state to make a decision about signing up for a high-interest card,” Kelmar said.

“MDs have the expertise to prescribe drugs -- not financial advice. You wouldn’t go to an investment banker for a medical diagnosis. Evidence shows that medical credit cards can worsen debt and even lead to bankruptcy. And your provider or hospital can’t cure that.” 

Medical bills are the source of many consumer issues these days. They can lead to bankruptcy and ruin someone’s credit rating if they’re not paid.Follo...

Article Image

Wegman’s says it accidentally double-billed some shoppers

Here’s a reminder that it’s always good to regularly check your credit card accounts. In addition to possible fraudulent changes, a legitimate merchant might place an accidental charge.

Wegman’s, the upscale supermarket chain, has disclosed that some customers were double-charged when they made purchases using a credit card. The extra charges occurred both at in-store checkout terminals and online.

The double-charging occurred on transactions that were processed on Aug. 16 and were reported at more than 110 Wegman’s locations in the U.S.

One consumer posting on Facebook said she contacted Wegman’s after she noticed the identical charges and was told that it was a “system-wide” error. Other customers advised shoppers to check their bank statements, though it’s not clear if the glitch affected debit cards.

Not to fear, company officials said affected customers will get reimbursed. The company said it is working with payment processors to restore the money. A company spokesperson told media outlets that affected customers should get their money back quickly, depending on the cards’ issuers.

The spokesperson did not disclose a reason for the error.

Here’s a reminder that it’s always good to regularly check your credit card accounts. In addition to possible fraudulent changes, a legitimate merchant mig...

Article Image

U.S. credit card debt tops $1 trillion

A report by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York shows total credit card debt in the U.S. has reached $1 trillion for the first time. 

Credit card balances surged by $45 billion in the second quarter of the year as more Americans apparently relied on expensive credit to make ends meet. That 4% increase pushed total indebtedness to the highest gross value in Fed data, extending back to 2003.

Another report – this one from the credit bureau TransUnion – shows many of the consumers running up large credit card balances are student loan borrowers, whose monthly payments have been on hold since April 2020.

Unfortunately for them, however, those payments are set to resume within weeks. In addition to resuming those loan payments, many will also have to find a way to pay their credit card bills.

The burden of additional debt

“The majority of consumers with a student loan have not been required to make payments for the better part of three years,” said Liz Pagel, senior vice president and consumer lending business leader at TransUnion. “Payment amounts will vary, but many of these consumers have taken on additional debt since the last time they had to pay their student loans. It’s important for both lenders and consumers to be prepared for this new payment shock.”

The TransUnion report shows that 53% of student loan borrowers, relieved of having to make loan payments during the last three years, opened new credit card accounts. Thirty-six percent also took out auto loans.

“These additional credit products mean additional monthly payments, the accumulation of which may pose added challenges for households attempting to reintegrate student loan payments into their monthly budget,” Pagel said.

While the Department of Education has offered a 12-month moratorium before student loan delinquencies will have an impact on consumer credit files, interest will begin to accrue immediately so Pagel says it is in the best interest of consumers to resume payments right away.

What to do

Faced with a tighter budget, many student loan borrowers may be tempted to make only the minimum payment on their credit card bill, but personal finance experts warn that’s a costly strategy, especially with interest rates north of 20%.

The quickest way to put a dent in your credit card balance is to apply for a balance transfer credit card that offers 12 to 20 months of 0% interest. That means the entire monthly payment goes to pay down the balance.

The ConsumerAffairs research team has analyzed current offerings and selected these seven balance transfer cards as among the best. All seven charge a balance transfer fee, but the fees charged by the Quicksilver from Capital One and SavorOne Rewards from Capital One may be the lowest.

Once the interest-free period ends, borrowers can pay off the remaining balance with a personal loan because rates are generally lower than credit card rates. Learn more about personal loans here.

A report by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York shows total credit card debt in the U.S. has reached $1 trillion for the first time. Credit card balan...

Article Image

Warren Buffet’s not worried about Fitch’s U.S. downgrade. Should you be?

In a shock to the Biden administration and the financial markets, Fitch, a debt ratings agency, has downgraded the U.S. government’s credit rating from AAA to AA+.

The firm explained its move by pointing to the Congressional brinksmanship in early June that nearly resulted in the U.S. government defaulting on its debt. 

"In Fitch's view, there has been a steady deterioration in standards of governance over the last 20 years, including on fiscal and debt matters, notwithstanding the June bipartisan agreement to suspend the debt limit until January 2025," the agency said. "The repeated debt-limit political standoffs and last-minute resolutions have eroded confidence in fiscal management."

Legendary investor Warren Buffet, chairman of Berkshire Hathaway, spoke up to calm the markets.

"Berkshire bought $10 billion in U.S. Treasurys last Monday. We bought $10 billion in Treasurys this Monday. And the only question for next Monday is whether we will buy $10 billion in 3-month or 6-month" T-bills, Buffett said in an interview with CNBC. "There are some things people shouldn't worry about, this is one."

But it’s one thing for a billionaire not to be concerned. How about someone like you?

It depends

Personal finance experts say it all depends on your circumstances. If you have savings, it might actually be good for you in the long run if interest rates keep rising. But if you have lots of adjustable-rate debt, it might have a real downside at some point. But there are few signs of that on the horizon.

Matthew Schaller, MBA, CFA, CFP at Compardo, Wienstroer, Conrad & Janes at Moneta, in St. Louis, says there has been only muted bond market reaction so far.

“We are not expecting material changes to consumer debt, at least not as a result of the downgrade,” Schaller told ConsumerAffairs. “Mortgages are tied to the 10-year Treasury, which rose on the news of the downgrade vs. an expected drop.  The same goes for credit card debt and car loans, which tend to be influenced by the two-year Treasury.  

Schaller says the two-Year Treasury should have spiked if the market was truly worried about the U.S.'s fiscal state, but it only rose two basis points,  which he said is not an abnormal move in a given trading day.

“The downgrade news itself seems immaterial on interest rates, at least for now,” he added.  “Fitch’s main reasoning behind the downgrade discussed dysfunction in Washington. Which, quite frankly, there has been dysfunction in Washington for a long-time – it just seems this time it was enough of a reason to downgrade the U.S. debt.”

In spite of everything, Schaller says the U.S. economy is still showing resilience, “perhaps more surprisingly than most economists were predicting this time last year.”  

In a shock to the Biden administration and the financial markets, Fitch, a debt ratings agency, has downgraded the U.S. government’s credit rating from AAA...

Article Image

Loyalty program values continue to slide so why are consumers still attracted to them?

Have you ever taken the time to calculate how much you have to spend to earn a mile or a point in the loyalty rewards programs you’re a part of? It's really simple.

Most loyalty program points/miles are worth about a penny which means the reality of a rewards program will often cost you $50 to get a $5 coffee at Starbucks or tens of thousands of dollars to get a flight that would otherwise cost you $700. 

Loyalty programs continue to get even more expensive. For example, United Airlines just increased its requirements, with a one-way saver transatlantic award starting at 40,000 miles where it used to take only 30,000.

And they’re also becoming loaded with gamification because the bigger sticks and carrots they can get a consumer to chase bring in more revenue. Sorry, but offering actual value to a customer enrolled in those programs just doesn’t exist anymore.

How does one play the loyalty game and win? Good question. ConsumerAffairs asked loyalty program gurus – the people who play this game like it’s a real job – how someone can get the most out of their credit card loyalty programs. What they came back with was pretty insightful. Involved, too, so be ready to jump through some hoops.

First off, don’t be delusional

To woo consumers, companies are smart enough to know that there’s no upside in divulging the true value of points or the hoops and fine print that someone has to eventually face in cashing those in.

So companies throw lots of sign-up bonuses at us. “25,000 miles to sign up, no fee for the first year” come-ons costs the company nothing, but if they can get a consumer to bite, then the cha-chings start to roll. 

But, a big problem with loyalty programs is that most people don't really know – or investigate – what they're signing up for. 

“People keep signing up for these programs because they think they'll get lots of perks, even if they have to spend a bunch to get them,” Michael Lisovetsky, co-founder of the banking platform Zurp, told ConsumerAffairs. “There is an illusion that their entire travel experience will change for the better, but many are designed for frequent or high-spending travelers,” not the couple who flies to Sarasota once a year to see their grandkids.

Don’t be greedy, either. RatePunk CEO Justin Albertynas told us that “Applying for multiple credit cards within a short period can have a negative impact on your credit score. It's advisable to be strategic when considering joining more loyalty programs.”

How to better reap what you sow

When ConsumerAffairs put this question to the experts, the floodgates opened with input. It’s a safe bet that at least one of these will get an "a-ha" from anyone who’s part of a loyalty program.

Weigh the value of rewards vs. cash back. “Not everyone is a great candidate for a travel rewards credit card,” says Nick Ewen at ThePointsGuy. “There are a number of no-annual-fee, cash-back credit cards out there that award 2% back on every single purchase you make. If you don’t want to worry about earning miles or points to cover an entire flight, cashback gives you the flexibility to put money back in your pocket whenever it suits you, since you’re not limited to travel.”

Be flexible and only travel in the low season. RatePunk CEO Justin Albertynas said the deals are better when strict dates don’t limit your choices and when the destinations aren’t overcrowded with tourists during the most popular time of visiting. “It will help you get the best deals and save your travel rewards,” he suggested.

Only use the card where and when it’s worth it. Brendan Miller, CMO of Runa, agreed, saying that wise consumers will look for cards that give the best bang for the buck they spend in certain spending categories, such as gas or food. “Consider the types of rewards offered, redemption options, frequency of usage, and the points earning rates. Spreading your points - and interest levels - too thinly across a broad range of businesses risks minimizes the value-add from your hard-earned loyalty bonuses.”

Look at the route network before committing. An airline may offer you 100,000 miles to sign up, but that doesn’t mean squat if you have no interest in flying to the places it goes to or you don’t even like the airline, David Doughty, the CEO of Admiral Jet told us. “If someone’s preferred airline offers extensive coverage to the destinations they frequently visit or partnerships with other carriers that suit their travel needs, it’s worthwhile to accumulate miles and maintain their loyalty status even if the rewards are minor.” Otherwise, it could be a complete waste of time.

Use your card for big purchases. One of the hot stick-and-carrot angles is for a credit card to reward a consumer with an unbelievable number of miles if they spend a certain amount of money in a short period of time (like $3,000 in 3 months). In her review of travel cards, ConsumerAffairs’ Kathryn Parkman says the best use of those type cards is when you’re going to make a major purchase. “That way, you can be sure to hit the sign-up bonus and maximize the amount of points you gain right off the bat,” she said.

However, you need to be careful with these types of bonus offers. You may get 75,000 miles for spending $4,000 in three months on a credit card, but if it’s going to cost you 80,000 miles to fly to London and back, that means you have to spend even more money to get that award flight; and if you don’t use the miles but stick with the card for another year, the membership fee could be as much as $395.

Churning. Murtaza ​​Khanbhai, the founder of Reward Flight, told ConsumerAffairs about a community of consumers – called “churners” – who are dedicated to getting the most value out of these programs. It’s kind of like playing the stock market, but for those readers who like that kind of excitement, here goes:  “They sign up for these credit cards for large signup bonuses and then cancel them,” he said. “When done properly you can fly in business and first class for a fraction of the regular price. For those not interested in traveling you can also redeem them for cashback offers, often upwards of $500.” Where are these communities, pray tell? ​​Khanbhai said there’s a group on both Reddit and FlyerTalk.

What are the “extra” perks? On top of the welcome bonus, Ewen says consumers should consider what, if anything, they’ll get past that stage. 

One of his favorite perks is waived checked bag fees. “If you live in an airline’s hub (e.g. Charlotte for American, Atlanta for Delta) and you take at least a couple of flights per year, an airline credit card can be a major money saver,” Ewen told ConsumerAffairs. He said that most of those allow the primary cardholder to check a bag for free on all domestic flights, and many times that perk also extends to multiple companions on the same reservation. 

“Let’s say you live in Atlanta, and you and your spouse check a bag on just one round-trip domestic flight every year. You’d have to pay $120 ($30 per person each way) for this privilege. However, if you have the Gold Delta American Express card and pay a $95 annual fee, those baggage fees are automatically waived for you and up to eight travelers on your reservation.”

However, he throws out a caution flag on that suggestion, saying that some companies make perks unnecessarily difficult to utilize, so read the fine print before you sign on the dotted line.

Have you ever taken the time to calculate how much you have to spend to earn a mile or a point in the loyalty rewards programs you’re a part of? It's reall...

Article Image

Consumers’ credit card debt is approaching $1 trillion

With inflationary headwinds stubbornly persisting, Americans are increasingly adding to their credit card balances. A new report from the St. Louis Federal Reserve Bank shows balances on credit cards and other revolving credit products are fast approaching $1 trillion.

That’s a reversal from three years ago when COVID-19 lockdowns resulted in a dramatic drop in credit card spending. Credit card balances actually declined to $750 billion in 2021. Consumers have added nearly $250 billion to their credit card accounts in just two years.

Making matters worse, the Federal Reserve’s campaign to raise interest rates to reduce inflation has boosted the average credit card interest rate to 24%, the highest since the 1980s. Personal finance experts concede the tasks can be challenging but say there are a few tools that can help an overburdened consumer reduce their debt.

“If you're struggling to pay down your balance, use a 0% balance transfer card to save on interest,” said Andrea Woroch, a personal finance author. “This will buy you more time to pay off your balance without interest piling up and could save you a lot of money and give you relief in your monthly budget to afford higher prices.”

While that can help, remember that many balance transfer cards charge a fee, based on a percentage of the transferred balance. Most fees are 3% but some may be as high as 5%. ConsumerAffairs has researched the best balance transfer cards here.

Personal loans

Taking out a personal loan to pay off a credit card balance is another option. In most cases, the interest rate on a personal loan is significantly less than a credit card. 

To pick the best lender for you, you’ll want to compare features, including annual percentage rate (APR), repayment terms, fees and loan amounts. Again, ConsumerAffairs researchers have reviewed lenders and picked the best eight offers.

Once you reduce interest charges, Markia Brown, certified financial education instructor at Money Plug, says you should avoid the mistake of sliding back into bad habits.

“This can manifest in several ways, such as overspending, accumulating high-interest debt, inadequate savings, and lack of investment for the future,” told us. “To avoid these pitfalls, it is crucial to establish clear financial goals, create and follow a budget, prioritize saving and investing, and be disciplined with spending habits.”

With inflationary headwinds stubbornly persisting, Americans are increasingly adding to their credit card balances. A new report from the St. Louis Federal...

Article Image

Consumers struggled with rising debt in the first quarter

With inflation eating away at paychecks, you may be sinking deeper into debt. If you are, you aren’t alone.

A report by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York shows total household debt rose by $148 billion, or 0.9% to $17.05 trillion in the first quarter of 2023. As something of a surprise, credit card debt didn’t increase very much.

Instead mortgage balances climbed by $121 billion and stood at $12.04 trillion at the end of March. Auto loan and student loan balances also increased to $1.56 trillion and $1.60 trillion, respectively.

While credit card balances were flat in the first quarter, at $986 billion, that runs counter to the typical trend. Fed economists note credit card balances usually go down in the first quarter of most years.

Tony Dwyer, chief market strategist at Canaccord Genuity, believes an increase in consumer spending on credit cards is only beginning, flashing a warning sign for American households as well as the U.S. economy. In an interview with CNBC, Dwyer said consumers are still spending only because they have available credit.

‘Unsustainable’

“At some point, you’re going to deplete your cash,” Dwyer said. “At some point, the money supply data, the movement of money out of deposits into money market funds, and the use of credit cards are going to hit a level that is unsustainable and I think we’re pretty close to it.”

In an environment of rising interest rates, consumers cut back on other types of debt. Mortgage refinancings were sharply lower because homeowners with 3% mortgage rates were not eager to start paying 6%. That means home equity is staying in the home and not being taken out to spend on other things.

The volume of new auto loans was $162 billion, a reduction from pandemic-era highs but still elevated compared to pre-COVID volumes. Again, interest rates may be keeping some people from purchasing a new vehicle.

Holding onto cars longer

This week S&P Global Mobility reported that the average age of vehicles on U.S. roads hits 12.5 years, another record. The report said there are almost 122 million vehicles in operation that are over 12 years old.

High interest rates, along with inflation, may be making it harder for Americans to keep up financially. The Fed’s report shows the share of current debt becoming delinquent increased across nearly all types of debt. The delinquency transition rate for credit cards rose by 0.6% and 0.2% for auto loans.

Sometimes, having a little coaching and information can help consumers get a handle on their finances when debt starts to rise. Check out what ConsumerAffairs learned when we rated credit counseling agencies.

With inflation eating away at paychecks, you may be sinking deeper into debt. If you are, you aren’t alone.A report by the Federal Reserve Bank of New...

Article Image

Got medical debt? Make sure it’s not on your credit report.

It may be time to take a new look at your credit report – especially if you are among half of the Americans who have any kind of medical debt. The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) says that many consumers who've taken on some form of medical debt in the last year have protections they need to know about. 

The biggest subset of that pool is the 40+ million people who might have unpaid medical bills. For them, the U.S. Congress, federal agencies, and others have stepped up to pass the No Surprises Act to help protect Americans from certain unexpected medical bills, such as those surprise medical bills from out-of-network providers for “emergency services.”

The second group of consumers who are getting some relief are those who’ve seen negative information pop up on their credit reports related to a medical expense. For them, the CFPB has laid down the law to debt collectors and consumer credit reporting companies that they can’t collect, furnish, or report any invalid medical debt.

In the wake of the pandemic, Equifax, Experian, and TransUnion were tasked with removing all paid medical debts from consumer credit reports, those less than a year old, and all medical collections under $500. That last step went into effect on April 11, 2023, and with this change, the CFPB estimates that roughly half of those with medical debt on their reports will have it removed from their credit history in the upcoming months.

Those three companies have taken to this task expeditiously, too. When ConsumerAffairs checked on their collective progress, TransUnion claimed that nearly 70% of the total medical collection debt tradelines reported to the Nationwide Credit Reporting Agencies (NCRAs) have been removed from consumer credit files. 

Making sure your debt isn’t still being reported

To prove they’re doing what they were told, Equifax, Experian, and TransUnion are offering free online credit reports once a week through AnnualCreditReport.com. The CFPB says consumers with medical debt would be wise to order one from each and double-check if they’ve been removed like they’re supposed to be. 

The agency offered this advice to be sure:

  • If you previously had a medical collection under $500, a paid medical collection, or a collection less than a year old on your credit report, check to make sure they no longer appear on your reports. Be aware, however, that this doesn’t include credit card collections, even if you used your credit card to pay for a medical expense under $500.

  • Also, while you’re looking at your reports, check for any other information that might be inaccurate. Here’s a list of the typical inaccuracies on a credit report.

  • If you find a medical collection under $500, a paid medical collection, a collection less than a year old, or errors on your report, you can dispute that information with the credit reporting company.

If you run into problems

Another olive branch the credit reporting companies are offering is an extension of the time it takes to dispute, negotiate, or pay for any outstanding bills before they can be reported. Consumers in those situations now have one year from the time they saw a doctor before they’re allowing medical debt to appear on their credit report. 

For those who are unable to pay their medical bills, they may qualify for financial assistance programs, aka “charity care.”

If all else fails, the CFPB says it's got our collective backs. “We expect that the No Surprises Act, the recent actions by credit reporting companies, and the CFPB’s own actions and guidance will reduce the challenges many families face after they receive medical care,” the agency said.

“If you find invalid medical bills on your credit report or if you’re having issues disputing other medical bill errors with the credit reporting companies, submit a complaint to the CFPB.”

It may be time to take a new look at your credit report – especially if you are among half of the Americans who have any kind of medical debt. The Consumer...

Article Image

If you’re a SmileDirectClub, AT&T, or Discover Credit Card customer there may be ready cash waiting for you

There are a good number of class action settlements that are winding down and the window for consumers to file for their share of the settlement is closing with it -- as early as in the next week or two.

ConsumerAffairs found these settlements that end soon, courtesy of ClassAction.org. Click on the name of the company to get to the settlement website.

Company

Lawsuit Details

Claim Deadline

Subaru

If you own or lease a 2015-2020 Outback, 2015-2020 Forester, 2015-2020 Legacy, 2015-2020 WRX or 2019-2020 Ascent, you may be included in this settlement.

5/8/23

Smile Direct Club

This settlement includes Florida residents who received a text message from SmileDirectClub between July 1, 2021 and December 30, 2022.

5/10/23

AT&T

This FTC settlement covers AT&T customers who had an unlimited data plan with the company at some point between October 1, 2011 and June 30, 2015 and who have not already received payment or refunds in the matter.

5/18/23

Wesson Oil

If you bought Wesson cooking oil prior to July 2017 in certain states listed on the settlement site, you may be able to claim a piece of a newly proposed $3 million settlement.

5/22/23

Preferred Home Care

If you were affected by the Preferred Home Care data breach that occurred between January 8 and January 10, 2021, you may be able to claim a piece of this settlement. Typical amount: $3,900.

5/23/23

Snap-On Tools

You may be covered by this settlement if your personal information was affected by the March 2022 Snap-on data breach. Typical amount: $3,250.

5/28/23

Kiplinger (newsletters)

This settlement is open to those who paid for a subscription to The Kiplinger Letter, Kiplinger’s Investing for Income, Personal Finance Magazine, The Kiplinger Tax Letter or Kiplinger’s Retirement Report for delivery to a Michigan address between December 24, 2015 and July 30, 2016. Typical settlement: $248

6/6/23

Vizzy Hard Seltzer

If you bought Vizzy hard seltzer beverages between January 1, 2020 and March 10, 2023, you may be covered by this settlement.

6/6/23

Discover (credit card)

You may be covered by this settlement if you received artificial or prerecorded voice calls from Discover between August 25, 2017 and February 7, 2023 regarding a credit card account that did not belong to you. Typical amount: $40

6/8/23

Other class action lawsuits in the beginning stages

There are a number of what could be profitable settlements waiting for consumers if some of the class action lawsuits that are being filed come to fruition. Make note of these and keep an eye out for how you can apply for your portion of the settlement.

Twitter: ClassAction.org says that attorneys are investigating whether a class action lawsuit can be filed in light of allegations that Twitter said it was collecting information from users for account security purposes but secretly used the data to target them with ads.

Diet Pepsi: If you’re a Diet Pepsi drinker, heads up. ClassAction says that attorneys are investigating whether Diet Pepsi contains toxic chemicals known as PFAS and, if so, whether a class action lawsuit could be filed over the issue.

Roundup: Several lawsuits have been filed claiming that the herbicide Roundup a) can cause cancer, and b) that the manufacturer was lax in warning people about the risk. 

Ford Motor: ClassAction also reported that drivers have reported problems with their vehicle’s transmissions when starting, accelerating, and shifting. Attorneys are now investigating whether a class action is possible.

There are a good number of class action settlements that are winding down and the window for consumers to file for their share of the settlement is closing...

Article Image

Taylor Swift avoided the FTX mess by asking one simple question

Taylor Swift is a successful pop star with a string of million-selling albums to her credit. But it turns out she has some investor savvy as well.

In 2021 FTX, the now bankrupt and defunct crypto exchange, approached Swift about signing a $100 million endorsement deal. Several other celebrities had already done so.

Swift didn’t sign and now we know why. Adam Moskowitz, one of the lawyers handling a class-action suit against several high-profile FTX promotors, says Swift was the only person to ask a very important question.

Moskowitz, appearing on "The Scoop" podcast to discuss the lawsuit, said Taylor turned to the lawyers and asked if the FTX securities were registered. She was told they were not.

At that point Swift backed out of the deal and, in doing so avoided becoming a defendant in the lawsuit. Tom Brady, Shaquille O’Neal, and Larry David signed the deal and now face a lawsuit.

Big losses

Investors in the FTX exchange should probably have asked that question as well. Investors lost an estimated $8 billion and FTX founder Sam Bankman-Fried faces federal fraud charges.

Operating from the Bahamas with little to no regulation, FTX “loaned” investors’ deposits to a sister company, Alameda Research, which made a number of risky investments, resulting in big losses.

A security is defined as a tradable asset that has value, such as a stock or bond. Securities sold in the U.S. must be registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The SEC has accused FTX of selling an unregistered security in the form of FTT, its cryptocurrency.

Swift may have inherited some of her investment smarts from her father. According to Business Insider, he was an investment adviser with Merrill Lynch for 30 years.

Taylor Smith is a successful pop star with a string of million-selling albums to her credit. But it turns out she has some investor savvy as well.In 20...

Article Image

That new balance transfer credit card with 0% interest looks inviting, but it can also mean trouble

With the economy bouncing all over the place, consumers have been bouncing their credit all over the place, too. Hoping to find some breathing room, people have turned to Buy Now Pay Later (BNPL) and balance transfers as options.  

BNPL has been much derided by both financial experts and the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB), but recently there’s been an increase in balance transfers, and one financial guru tells ConsumerAffairs that option is a double-edged sword.

“Balance transfers are both a good and bad thing,” Cyndie Martini, the CEO and Founder of Member Access Processing (MAP), said, laying most of her concerns at the feet of “credit card churning” that sucks people into the balance transfer vortex.

And churning is certainly attractive. It can give a consumer the impression that they can open a new credit card account and score some sort of benefits like zero-percent or low-interest balance. There might even be a bonus like airline credit cards often do, dangling the carrot of tens of thousands of miles that could be used for free travel.

The ramifications of balance transfers

Martini – in big, bold letters – says that before taking the balance transfer route, consumers need to consider what they’re getting into.

Don't overextend yourself, it's not free money. “Balance transfers come with certain costs and limitations. Generally, you'll have to pay a balance transfer fee - usually 3% or 5% of the total transfer,” she said. “Therefore, know that a credit transfer is not free money to extend paying off your open balance – it's simply discounted.”

Your credit score can be impacted. Really? Really. Martini said that unbeknownst to many people, their credit score is impacted based on the total limit of combined cards. As an example, she offered this narrative: “For example, if you have two cards with a $10,000 limit on each card, your credit score will be affected in the same way if you have four cards with $5K limits on each. The effects of a balance transfer may be hard to predict, but it's important to arm yourself with as much important information as possible before you transfer any open balances.”

Understand why you want to transfer your balance to a new card. Yes, that’s “why” and not “why not.” “Your credit card score will also be impacted each time you sign up for a new card to transfer your balance onto because the credit card company will have to run a credit check on the account when you sign up,” Martini said. But, if having simply a “good” credit score rather than a "Holy Grail" perfect credit score is good enough, then a transfer balance may be a worthwhile consideration. 

Plan for when you run out of free interest. Let’s say you have a 6-month interest-free offer when you transfer your limit to your new card, but you still have $10K in debt. “Then it's better to pay off the debt balance rather than continuing to transfer your open balance to new cards,” she recommended.

In its review of balance transfers, the CFPB also offered its insights on what happens when the "free interest" dries up. If anyone uses the same new credit card to make new purchases, they need to understand that they won’t get a grace period for those purchases and will have to pay interest until they pay the entire balance in full, including the transferred balance. Worse yet, if you’re more than 60 days late on a payment, the credit card company can increase your interest rate on all balances, including the transferred balance.

Pay your balance within your interest period. If you don't pay your balance in full within this period, the credit card company may charge you for the 6-month free interest in total. Oops. Most people don’t want to take the time to read a credit card policy before they leap into one, but Martini said that the devil is in those details more times than not and it’s worth poring over all the ifs, ands or buts.

Do the math. Martini said that if you have a significant amount of credit card debt, the 3-5% balance transfer fee is absolutely worth paying when transferring your balance to a card that has a 0% intro APR offer, but only – and this is important – if they still need time to pay off the balance. However, she said that if you can pay off your balance immediately in full on your current card, that is ideal because you'll save on any new interest fees as well as a balance transfer fee. 

If after considering all of these points you decide a balance transfer card makes financial sense, ConsumerAffairs has looked at some of the best.

With the economy bouncing all over the place, consumers have been bouncing their credit all over the place, too. Hoping to find some breathing room, people...

Article Image

CFPB pins the tail of complaints squarely on credit reporting agencies

How bad do consumers think credit reporting agencies are? Plenty bad. According to a new analysis by the U.S. PIRG Education Fund, complaints to the U.S. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) about credit reporting problems nearly doubled from 2021 to 2022.

At the top of this dubious list: the so-called “Big 3” credit bureaus -- TransUnion, Equifax and Experian. That trio received more complaints than any other financial firms in 2022 – 604,221 out of 3,420,113 total complaints.

Credit reporting agencies stink up the place when it comes to reviews at ConsumerAffairs, too. Equifax had the most reviews over the last year and 98.1% of those were 1-star. TransUnion and Experian basically tied with the second most reviews with 93.3% of TransUnion’s reviews being 1-star and 86.9% of Experian reviews earning the lowest rating.


"I’ve studied credit reporting complaints for over 30 years, yet I cannot comprehend how little the credit bureaus’ poor treatment of consumers has changed,” said Ed Mierzwinski, senior director for federal consumer programs at U.S. PIRG Education Fund. “When Americans describe a system rigged against them in the stories they file into the CFPB database, it’s unfortunately not surprising -- I’ve seen it all before.”

Many people are griping about the same issues

Among the key findings of PIRG’s “Big Credit Bureaus, Record Complaints: a look at increases in CFPB consumer complaints 2021-2022” report is that many consumers have the same gripes --  student loans, checking and savings accounts, and credit card or prepaid card complaints.

New financial technologies cracked the Top Ten for the first time, with consumers up in arms about frauds and scams and virtual currency like Bitcoin, as well as standard services like credit repair and money transfer categories.

On a per-capita basis, consumers in Georgia, Delaware, Florida, the District of Columbia and Alabama filed the most complaints.

How can consumers make use of the CFPB’s database?

ConsumerAffairs has been using the agency’s database for about a year and it’s been very helpful in giving us insights into problems such as with Buy Now Pay Later.

We reached out to the CFPB to find out how a consumer can make the best use of the database and one of the beauties of the system is that someone can look at the complaints of a certain company and see how that company responded.

For example, one consumer filed a complaint against TD Bank, saying they asked the bank to close a checking account but the account stayed open, accruing fees. The record shows the bank responded in a “timely fashion” and the complaint was “closed with monetary relief.”

The agency said that in conversations with stakeholders, the database is typically best for gaining insights into problems people are experiencing in the marketplace.

To aid consumers, PIRG is also releasing a short video showing how easy it is to use the database.

The CFPB encourages consumers to file complaints

The CFPB is required by law to monitor consumer complaints. While more is not necessarily the merrier, anytime a consumer files a complaint, it provides the CFPB with important information about the types of challenges consumers are experiencing with financial products and services and how companies are responding to consumers’ concerns. 

The agency didn’t specifically name situations where complaints led to it filing an action against a specific company, but it’s possible that its investigation against Venmo and its concerns over “negative option” subscription programs likely were connected to consumer complaints.

"For the CFPB to do its only job, protecting consumers, as effectively as possible, it’s important to hear directly from people what’s going wrong,” said U.S. PIRG Education Fund Consumer Campaign Director Mike Litt. “The complaints in this database act like an alarm system. When the CFPB reads them, it’s alerted to problems, who the culprits are, and what actions it needs to take.”

How bad do consumers think credit reporting agencies are? Plenty bad. According to a new analysis by the U.S. PIRG Education Fund, complaints to the U.S. C...

Article Image

Extra introduces a debit card that can raise your credit score

Using a credit card and making timely payments usually increases your credit score. However, making purchases with a debit card does not. That’s because you aren’t “borrowing” the money when you make a purchase, it comes straight out of your bank account.

But leave it to the new wave of fintech financial services companies to find a workaround. Extra card has introduced the Extra debit card and company executives say using it responsibly will raise your credit score. Here’s how:

A regular debit card is issued by your bank. It’s the same as writing a check, but more efficient.

The Extra debit card has some features of a credit card. For example, it pays rewards. But it is linked to your bank account, just like a regular debit card issued by your bank.

When you make a purchase with the Extra debit card, Extra pays for the purchase immediately, then withdraws the amount of the purchase from your bank account. When you make an on-time payment, Extra reports the payment to Equifax and Experian – two of the three credit reporting agencies.

The company has released research that found that over the course of one year, Extra card members who practiced good credit habits while successfully using the product as recommended, experienced an average overall credit score increase of 48 points and were twice as likely to get approved for an auto loan or a credit card.

Road to higher credit score?

Company officials say the card could be a way for a consumer with marginal credit, who might not qualify for a credit card, to raise their score so they can access credit on better terms.

"We seem to be in an era now where tech-bro negligence is at an all-time high, which was one of the main reasons why conducting a study like this and providing proof points for Extra's first-of-its-kind product is more important than ever," said Cyrus Summerlin, co-founder & chief brand officer of Extra. "As an uncertain economy continues to affect customers, I would love to see a reset in fintech startup culture that celebrates impact made, more than just money raised.”

Using an Extra debit card carries a monthly or annual fee. The Extra Credit Building program costs $8 a month. The Extra Credit Building and Rewards program costs $12 a month or $108 for the entire year. 

Using a credit card and making timely payments usually increases your credit score. However, making purchases with a debit card does not. That’s because yo...

Article Image

Have you checked your credit card balance lately?

If you’re paying more money each month to keep your credit card account current, but are seeing the loan balance continuing to rise, you’re in good company. A new report from the Federal Reserve Bank of New York said that’s the situation for a growing number of people.

By the end of 2022, credit card balances totaled $986 billion – an increase of $61 billion over the previous quarter. If that seems like a big number, it is. It’s the largest increase in credit card debt from one quarter to the next since the Fed began collecting that data in 1999.

It doesn’t stop with credit card debt. The report shows overall household debt, which includes mortgages, car loans and student loans – combined with credit card balances – surged to $16.9 trillion by the end of the year.

"Credit card balances grew robustly in the fourth quarter, while mortgage and auto loan balances grew at a more moderate pace, reflecting activity consistent with pre-pandemic levels," said Wilbert van der Klaauw, economic research advisor at the New York Fed. "Although historically low unemployment has kept consumers' financial footing generally strong, stubbornly high prices and climbing interest rates may be testing some borrowers' ability to repay their debts."

It’s happening

Actually, there’s evidence that is happening. A report by Moody’s Analytics shows that by the end of the year, nearly 10% of car loans extended to people with subprime credit scores were 30 days or more behind on payments at the end of 2022.

Car prices inflated last year and auto loan rates rise every time the Fed raises its federal funds rate, putting the squeeze on more people.

“The households that were on the financial ledge to begin with might have been tipped to the point where it’s hard to keep up on the car loan and everything else, and people have to make some very hard decisions,” Pamela Foohey, a professor at Cardozo School of Law, told the Wall Street Journal.

Sandwich generation

While fears of a recession have begun to recede, it doesn’t help the growing number of people who are struggling under a mountain of debt. A study by New York Life shows members of Gen X – a demographic that usually has older children and aging parents – use their credit cards the most. 

“While financial health and confidence for Americans may differ for myriad factors, it’s worth noting that women and Gen Xers, or those within the “Sandwich Generation,” are likely parent-caregivers, handling both parent or guardian and unpaid adult caregiving roles, often leading to greater levels of stress,” said Suzanne Schmitt, head of Financial Wellness at New York Life. 

Balance transfer credit cards with several months of 0% interest are a good option to quickly put a dent in a credit card balance. So is a personal loan, which often has an interest rate half of what credit cards charge.

The ConsumerAffairs Research Team has checked out both. Here’s what he found out about balance transfer cards and here’s the scoop on personal loans.

If you’re paying more money each month to keep your credit card account current, but are seeing the loan balance continuing to rise, you’re in good company...

Article Image

FTC finalizes order forcing Credit Karma to pay $3 million back to consumers and end misleading ‘pre-approved’ claims

When does “approved” or “pre-approved” mean just that?

In a ConsumerAffairs review of Credit Karma's credit card offers, Emily, of Macon Ga., said she found there were quite a few hoops to jump through. She said the loans the company pitched her as “approved” required filling out an application that promises it won't hurt your credit scores as well as APR and monthly payments which look great up front but turn out to be “crazy high.”

And what Emily experienced, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) apparently found happening across the entire consumer credit landscape with Credit Karma. Following a public comment period, the agency finalized a consent order settling charges that Credit Karma deployed “dark patterns” to misrepresent that consumers were “pre-approved” for credit card offers – pre-approved as in as much as a 90% sure shot of getting a good deal on a loan. 

Unfortunately, many of the people who applied for the credit offers weren’t as credit-worthy as they should be and wound up with nothing unless they wanted to bite off more than they could chew on monthly payments. 

However, the FTC said Credit Karma benefited because it was able to gather over 2,500 data points on each consumer, including credit and income information. Credit Karma then used that information to send targeted advertisements and recommendations for financial products, like credit cards.

Credit Karma disagrees, but will pay a fine. Is that good enough?

The FTC’s consent order requires the company to pay $3 million that will be sent to consumers who wasted time applying for these credit cards. It also agreed to stop making deceptive claims.

“We fundamentally disagree with allegations the FTC makes in their complaint, but we reached this agreement to put the matter behind us so we can maintain our focus on helping our members find the financial products that are right for them,” a Credit Karma spokesperson told ConsumerAffairs.

But as recently as December 2022, consumers were still complaining about the company’s pitches.

“Got an offer for a guaranteed approval on a product where they would pay me $50 if I was not approved. So, I applied, hard inquiry made on my credit within seconds, and I was not approved,” Jason, of Media Ohio wrote. 

But that’s where he felt Credit Karma failed to follow through on its offer. 

“I then contacted them to get my $50 and they told me that I could not receive it because I did not qualify and that they could not find any applications for credit, he said. 

It’s important for consumers to complain when they feel like they were wronged

Jason doesn’t have the same clout as the FTC, but his finger-waving is what the FTC wants to hear about. It asks anyone and everyone to let it know when they run up against something that doesn’t seem fair and honest by submitting a concern at its complaint website.

Not only is it worth doing it for the sake of protecting other consumers, but in Credit Karma’s case, the ones who complained will share in that $3 million fine. 

When does “approved” or “pre-approved” mean just that?In a ConsumerAffairs review of Credit Karma's credit card offers, Emily, of Macon Ga., said she f...

Article Image

Fed economists urge consumers to cut credit card spending

As inflation raises the cost of living, consumers are trying to keep up by putting more purchases on credit cards and allowing balances to grow. That is a cause of concern at the Federal Reserve, which is trying to fight inflation by raising interest rates.

In a new report, the Federal Reserve Bank of New York found credit card balances increased by $38 billion from the second quarter of last year to the third quarter. That coincides with sharp increases in the Consumer Price Index (CPI).

The Fed has two concerns. First, it would rather consumers spend less on products and services to help lower inflation. But a second concern is that, as high-interest credit card balances swell, fewer consumers will be able to make timely payments.

The Fed data doesn’t show which consumers pay off their credit cards in full each month and those who let their balances grow. However, the data does show the younger the consumers, the more debt they had in the third quarter.

Can consumers continue to make payments?

“The real test, of course, will be to follow whether these borrowers will be able to continue to make the payments on their credit cards,” the authors wrote.

In August, LendingClub Corporation, in partnership with PYMNTS.com, released its periodic study of consumer spending patterns and found that 61% of consumers spend all of their money between pay periods. That was up from 52% a year ago.

That makes living paycheck-to-paycheck the most common financial lifestyle in the U.S., with increasingly more high-income consumers now entering that category. Some, an estimated 13%, actually spent more than they earned in the previous six months by tapping savings or going into debt.

That presents a huge problem when prices of nearly everything are rising. It isn’t possible to keep up that kind of spending without an increase in income or an increase in debt.

Balance transfer or personal loan?

To reduce credit card debt, some consumers who can qualify for a balance transfer credit card might consider opening an account that offers a year or more of 0% interest. Another alternative is to take out a three-year fixed-rate personal loan and use the money to pay off a high-interest credit card.

The average interest rate on a credit card is approaching 21% but some are much higher. According to NASDAQ, the average interest rate on a three-year personal loan is less than 13%.

The payments may be higher but you get out of debt faster. A five-year loan might offer lower payments but carries a significantly higher interest rate.

A personal loan may also be a good choice if you need to pay off a large balance because it offers a fixed interest rate. Credit card rates will rise each time the Fed hikes interest rates.

As inflation raises the cost of living, consumers are trying to keep up by putting more purchases on credit cards and allowing balances to grow. That is a...

Article Image

Merchants say it’s too easy to dispute a charge on your credit card

Ever claim you didn’t make a purchase that shows up on your credit card? If you have and you actually received the product, it could come back to haunt you.

A new survey by fraud prevention firm Sift reveals that chargeback dispute rates have skyrocketed 35% in the last year. However, the more shocking number is that nearly one in four of the consumers who filed a chargeback claim admit to committing “friendly” fraud, at an average of $192.53 per claim.

“As the economy cools down from historic highs, consumers are looking to save money however they can, luring many to resort to first-party fraud,” said Sift Trust and Safety Architect Brittany Allen. Allen said that the big three fraud categories are also among the largest spending categories and include clothing and electronics.

Typical friendly fraud scenarios

Friendly fraud can show up in any number of ways according to Chargebacks911.

The innocent versions might come from a mom who sees unknown charges on the family’s cell phone bill which she disputes, only to find out later that her son made several in-app purchases on a game that he plays on his phone. “Oops, sorry.”

In fact, things that appeal to children are the most frequent drivers of unauthorized family purchases, according to ChargebackGurus: in addition to in-app purchases in video games, there’s streaming video and music, one-click shopping options on sites like Amazon, and website subscriptions.

Other not-so-guilty versions are where:

  • The consumer has buyer’s remorse and, instead of contacting the merchant to convey that, they go the chargeback route instead.

  • The item or service wasn’t delivered.

  • The item or service was not as described (counterfeit, wrong color, etc.).

  • The merchant didn’t cancel a recurring payment when requested.

The sinful versions revolve around a cardholder trying to get something for free. Cyber-shoplifting, if you will.

Defrauders might wait a couple of weeks before calling the credit card’s issuing bank and claiming that they don’t know what the charge is. They request a chargeback and, effectively score a freebie. 

Circling back to when children innocently make charges in-app that mom and dad don’t know about, there's also a wrongful flip-side called “first-party fraud” where family members – usually male, in their 20s, and struggling to make ends meet,  knowingly make a purchase without telling the cardholder. 

Another dishonorable version according to ChargebackGurus is when a customer wants a refund for whatever reason and the merchant won't give it to them. In many of those cases, the consumer files a dispute with the credit card company because they think that if the merchant ripped them off in the first place, the merchant would only lie or stonewall them if they asked for a refund directly.

Other consumers pay the price

Anyone who does even one friendly fraud chargeback is hurting their fellow consumer. That may sound like a stretch but with these chargebacks costing merchants more than $132 billion each year to eat the costs associated with fulfilling a chargeback, they have little choice but to shorten return windows, raise prices, and charge for returns to try and recoup those losses.

Unfortunately, tackling the issue gets even more tricky when a merchant’s customer becomes a fraudster. Until a customer is caught red-handed, merchants have little choice but to acquiesce because they don’t want to run the risk of losing a customer who may, in fact, be honest. 

Whether they’re an honest customer or a deceitful one, the customer is in the driver’s seat and they use that to their advantage. Allen said the majority of consumers – 83% – are less willing to buy from a brand in the future if they have to file a fraud-driven dispute, and 50% say they’d never shop with a seller again if it failed to resolve their dispute within 30 days.

Playing with fire

Friendly fraud is a temptress. If a cardholder gets away with an underhanded chargeback, 40% are likely to do it again within 60 days. One mother-daughter duo became so enamored with the scheme that they disputed charges with 14 credit card companies to defraud everyone from Chanel to the Dollar Store to the tune of $850,000. They were last seen in court in handcuffs.

Anyone who thinks friendly fraud is their proverbial ship coming in is playing with fire and their own financial reputation.

If they’re discovered, there’s a lot that can happen, none of it good. Ken Tumin, the founder of bank account comparison site DepositAccounts, says that people who commit friendly fraud get hit from two sides.

The merchant may choose to blacklist the consumer in which the consumer is no longer able to make purchases from the merchant.

The bank may close the account of the consumer if they think the consumer may be committing chargeback abuse. A closure like that could result in a drop in a consumer’s credit score, but even more concerning is that person may have a tough time finding another bank that will welcome them with open arms.

Banks can make that heat hotter, too

Tumin said that bank account closures can also be recorded into ChexSystems, a company that provides information about the use of deposit accounts by consumers. “Someone who has too many negative marks in ChexSystems may find it difficult to open a bank account,” he said.

And the temperature can go up even higher.

Anyone thinking that a false chargeback is less serious than true fraud – such as stolen cards and identity theft – may want to consider another defense. Merchants will claim that they have to protect themselves from significant financial losses caused by chargeback fraud and, as the mom and daughter deceivers found out, the courts are showing no fear in taking their gloves off. 

If you’ve committed friendly or chargeback fraud, it may be time for a good, hard look in the mirror – unless you think you look good in orange. 

According to law firm Bachner & Associates, PC, making a false chargeback in most states is punishable with a fine or imprisonment. In general, the penalties for credit card fraud vary from one to three years in jail and a fine of $1,000 to $10,000. 

Ever claim you didn’t make a purchase that shows up on your credit card? If you have and you actually received the product, it could come back to haunt you...

Article Image

Cash stuffing: A new generation discovers an old budgeting trick

American consumers owed nearly $1 trillion in credit card debt in the third quarter, according to data from the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. With the just-past Christmas holiday, that total is likely to go even higher.

One problem with credit cards is that unless you consult your online account two or three times a week, it’s hard to keep track of spending. So, many Gen Z consumers have started using a “new” budgeting trick that turns out not to be new at all.

It’s called “cash stuffing.” Lily W., a 22-year-old who offers personal finance advice on TikTok, says she lived on credit cards while attending nursing school. When she graduated, her balances totaled $17,000.

Lily, who goes by the handle @lilyrnbudgets, recently told Yahoo News that she paid off the entire $17,000 in just three years, thanks to cash stuffing. Instead of buying things with a credit card, Lily has switched to a cash system, which she explains in this video.

Actually, cash stuffing is an old-school system used by many older generations at some point in their lives. Personal finance radio personality Dave Ramsey advocates much the same budgeting system to his listeners, only he calls it the “envelope system.”

The envelope system lets you separate cash into different envelopes for different spending. After labeling each envelope with a category of spending, you go to a bank or ATM and withdraw the budgeted amount and place the cash into each envelope.

Limit some spending categories to cash

When you head to the supermarket, you leave your credit card in your wallet and take the amount of cash you think you’ll need. When you return, you replace any unspent money. At the end of the week, before you put the next week’s cash in the envelope, you take any leftover money and put it in savings.

The system might not be necessary for every spending category and may prove most helpful for the categories where you tend to go overboard.

The secret to this system’s effectiveness is the tight control it exerts over spending, making you think long and hard about every purchase. Because when the money in an envelope is gone, spending in that category has to stop until the following week.

American consumers owed nearly $1 trillion in credit card debt in the third quarter, according to data from the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. With the...

Article Image

FTC warns consumers about using BNPL for last-minute gift shopping

When it comes to using Buy Now, Pay Later (BNPL) for any 11th-hour holiday gift purchases, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) says consumers should stop now and think about it later.

Not that BNPL isn’t a good option for some, the agency suggests, but it can also lull consumers into buying more than they can truly afford. And if someone isn't careful with their usage of BNPL, there could be a nasty downside.

If Buy Now, Pay Later is new to you, it’s simply a credit option where a payment schedule splits your purchase amount into a specified number of payments. For example, you pay the first one at checkout, and then one payment every two weeks for six weeks.

“Using Buy Now, Pay Later can be convenient, and usually free from interest charges,” the FTC said in an email to ConsumerAffairs. “Still, if you choose Buy Now, Pay Later, there are a few things you may want to watch out for.”

Limit the number of BNPL purchases. Because you can make multiple Buy Now, Pay Later purchases through different services or merchants in a short time, it’s easy to end up with more debt than you intended, or can afford, the FTC says.

An associated problem with items bought using BNPL is if an item gets returned. The agency warns that even though you may be able to return the merchandise – and may eventually get credit – your loan repayment agreement may require you to continue to make payments while you are returning or disputing a purchase until your return or dispute is resolved.

“And, because there are three different companies involved – the Buy Now, Pay Later company, the seller, and your financial institution – it can be challenging and stressful to resolve a problem.

Don’t think of this as a “quick fix.” “Using Buy Now Pay Later may immediately feel like the better option but it can lead to a financial hangover once reality sets in come January,” Trey Loughran, CEO at Purchasing Power, a company that offers credit using a payroll deduction component, told ConsumerAffairs.

Loughran said that in addition to the terms and conditions, they need to pay extra attention to the number of agreements they may be making. 

“Failing to make an agreed-upon payment for a Buy Now Pay Later can have compounding effects – requiring the consumer to pay late fees and potentially impacting someone’s credit score,” he said. “At the end of the day, Buy Now Pay Later solutions are another form of credit and consumers need to be conscious not to overextend themselves.”

Are you aware of the connection between BNPL and your bank account? Most consumers are used to getting credit card statements and having a grace period to pay those, but BNPL works differently. Buy Now, Pay Later products generally require installment payments to be set up for automatic payments, usually debited from your bank account instead. 

You might be hit with multiple late fees. Again, another difference between credit cards and BNPL that many consumers are blind to – the use of interest vs. fees.

“Some Buy Now, Pay Later services charge multiple late fees for a single missed payment, or try more than once to collect automatic payments from your checking account if they don’t go through. This could mean you pay higher late fees than you expected or incur multiple overdraft fees,” the FTC said.

Do you like being hounded by calls from creditors if you’re late in paying? When ConsumerAffairs reviewed the FTC’s database of complaints regarding BNPL, there were numerous worrisome narratives from consumers.

Those included complaints about receiving calls and letters from collection agencies, being “retaliated against” by a BNPL company after a complaint was filed, and claims made that BNPL accounts existed for some consumers even though they had never applied for one.

Being hassled is no fun, so add that to your “do I really need to put this purchase on BNPL” list.

Please, please, please buy more. Speaking of being hounded, the FTC says that many Buy Now, Pay Later services and apps use your data and shopping history to encourage you to buy more and spend more.

When it comes to using Buy Now, Pay Later (BNPL) for any 11th-hour holiday gift purchases, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) says consumers should stop no...

Article Image

Consumer watchdogs divulge the nasty downside of Buy Now, Pay Later credit

"Buy now, pay later"? How about "Buy now, and there could be hell to pay later"?

A stern warning is being sent to consumers that there are all sorts of pitfalls to deal with when it comes to buy now, pay later (BNPL) – maybe more than the typical consumer is used to seeing from other finance methods like credit cards or personal loans.

“Realize that BNPL plans don’t offer the federal protections that come with purchases you make by credit card. If an item purchased with BNPL is faulty, lost or stolen, that does not mean you will have protection against having to repay the BNPL loan,” said Hannah Rhodes and Teresa Murray, U.S. PIRG’s Consumer Watchdog team, in their pitfall protection bulletin.

“The federal government offers that safeguard for credit card users.”

Hidden fees, interest, and debt collection

Rhodes and Murray said the complaints are mounting against BNPL companies – and it’s not just one thing, either. Hidden fees, interest, and debt collection, and customer service are all factors that are angering BNPL users.

Surveys also show that a successful BNPL demographic target is young people, who may not understand the business model. In addition, increasing the size of the “basket” leads to consumers buying more stuff that they don’t need and can’t afford.

Know what you’re signing up for

Rhodes and Murray say that with higher inflation and tighter budgets for many this holiday season, it's likely that more consumers will consider Buy Now, Pay Later offers, many without fully understanding them. 

BNPL works like this:

  • You make a purchase and agree to pay off the bill in four installments over six weeks.

  • You make the first payment at checkout using a debit or credit card.

  • The remaining three payments will come every two weeks, whether you have the money in your checking account or available on your credit card or not. If it’s “or not,” be prepared for possible overdraft or over limit fees of $30 or more.

Best case and worst case scenarios

The best case scenario is paying it off on time with no fees and no need to return the item. Worst case scenario? Hmm... Actually, we should make that plural because there’s more than one thing that could go wrong.

“Shoppers run into problems when there are terms and conditions they didn't read or understand, or when they make several purchases using BNPL and haven't budgeted to juggle all of the payments that are lined up like planes on an airport runway,” the watchdogs said.

“Then there are the consumer protections you're forgoing by not paying with a credit card to begin with. And you need to hope the item isn't defective or that the recipient of the gift doesn't want to return or exchange it. You may not be able to get a refund or an exchange, no matter the reason.”

The downsides to BNPL can quickly snowball and haunt a consumer for a long time, Trey Loughran, CEO at Purchasing Power, a company that offers credit using a payroll deduction component, told ConsumerAffairs.

"Failing to make an agreed-upon payment for a Buy Now Pay Later can have compounding effects – requiring the consumer to pay late fees and potentially impacting someone’s credit score," he said.

"At the end of the day, Buy Now Pay Later solutions are another form of credit and consumers need to be conscious not to overextend themselves."

"Buy now, pay later"? How about "Buy now, and there could be hell to pay later"?A stern warning is being sent to consumers that there are all sorts of...

Article Image

The Fed hiked interest rates again. Here’s what it means if you have a credit card balance

When Federal Reserve policymakers raised the federal funds rate another 0.75% this week, the focus was on Wall Street, where the move was panned by investors. Stock prices fell sharply once again.

There was less focus on consumers – particularly on those carrying large credit card balances. But they are being affected by the series of rate hikes as much as anyone.

The federal funds rate directly affects what banks pay for money – a cost that is passed on to borrowers. Each time the Fed hikes, banks charge more in the form of higher interest.

That is especially true for the interest rate on credit cards, which was already high before the Fed began to increase interest rates in an effort to rein in inflation. The average variable credit card rate is now 18.77%, the highest since February 1993, according to Bankrate.com. At the beginning of 2022, the rate averaged 16.30%.

The difference in those two rates amounts to about $20 a month in added interest on a $10,000 balance. That might not sound like a lot but for consumers making only the minimum payment each month, it can be painful.

A study by the Brookings Institute found that about three in 10 credit card borrowers make monthly payments at or near the required minimum. Paying only the minimum each month greatly lengthens the payoff time and results in large interest charges. Adding charges to the balance each month only makes the payoff longer and more expensive.

“It is the debt that consumers say they are most worried about,” Gary Koenig, vice president of financial security at AARP, told Yahoo Money. “With interest rates on credit cards rising, I would expect to see this number rising too in the months ahead. It is a very difficult situation for many consumers.”

Alternatives

Fortunately, consumers carrying high-interest credit card debt have a couple of good options. The first is to apply for a balance transfer card offering a year or more of 0% interest. 

By making large monthly payments cardholders can put a dent in their balances because the entire payment goes to paying off the principal. ConsumerAffairs has identified the best balance transfer credit cards here.

A second option is to apply for a personal loan, using the proceeds to pay off a high-interest credit card. According to a study by the St. Louis Federal Reserve bank, there has never been a wider gap between rates on personal loans and credit cards.

According to the latest data, which was for August, the average interest rate on 24-month personal loans was 10.16%, significantly below the average credit card rate. Like other types of loans, rates will vary based on your credit score and how much you need to borrow. 

The ConsumerAffairs Research Team vetted 24 loan companies with annual percentage rates (APRs) less than 36%. Check out our findings here.

When Federal Reserve policymakers raised the federal funds rate another 0.75% this week, the focus was on Wall Street, where the move was panned by investo...

Article Image

Credit agencies extend free credit reports through end of 2023

One of the best early warnings of identity theft is finding something unexpected on your credit report, such as a loan for a car that isn’t yours. 

During the pandemic, the three major credit reporting agencies began allowing consumers free access to their credit reports on a weekly basis and have jointly announced that free access will continue through 2023.

"The rising cost of living in the wake of COVID-19 has created economic consequences felt by many Americans," the CEOs of Equifax, Experian, and TransUnion said in a joint statement. "Our industry is committed to helping people better position themselves for strong financial futures. Credit reports play an important role in financial health, and providing weekly reports for consumers at no charge is another way that we can support financial education and stability for people across the U.S. at this critical time."

At a time when identity theft crimes are increasing, regularly reviewing credit reports can alert consumers to unauthorized credit activity in their name. Names, birthdates, and Social Security numbers are sold regularly on the dark web. 

A criminal who purchases this information can take out loans and apply for credit cards using a stolen identity. The victim might not become aware that this has happened until months later.

How to dispute erroneous information

Reviewing credit reports can also alert consumers to inaccurate entries that can drag down a credit score. Consumers may appeal to the credit agencies to have the erroneous information removed.

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) says consumers can submit a dispute to the credit reporting company by phone, by mail, or online. 

“Explain the error and what you want changed,” CFPB advises. “Clearly identify each mistake separately, state the facts, explain why you are disputing the information, and request that it be removed or corrected.”

  • Online access to Equifax’s dispute form can be found here.

  • Online access to Experian’s dispute form can be found here.

  • Online access to TransUnion’s dispute form can be found here.

Credit reports document consumers’ credit history and should be a factual record of credit activity and payment history. They are important because they are used by lenders, creditors, service providers and other businesses to extend financial opportunities and other offers to people. 

To access free weekly credit reports, go to www.annualcreditreport.com.

One of the best early warnings of identity theft is finding something unexpected on your credit report, such as a loan for a car that isn’t yours. Duri...

Article Image

Do you really know all that goes on with a Buy Now, Pay Later loan? The CFPB has some words of advice.

Consumers who think that Buy Now Pay Later (BNPL) loans are a perfect way to buy something on time should perhaps think a little more. After seeing BNPL grow tenfold over the past three years, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) went on a mission to find out if those type loans have anything that could harm the consumer in any way.

On top of issues like the risk of fraud and the impact on credit scores, the agency concluded in its new report that while the marketing of Buy Now, Pay Later loans can make them appear to be a zero-risk credit option, there are several other things that pose a risk for consumer harm.

BNPL loans may seem similar to credit cards, but…

CFPB Director Rohit Chopra called BNPL a “close substitute for credit cards,” and that’s exactly how some consumers view the loan since it, like a credit card, allows a consumer to split a retail transaction into smaller, interest-free installments and repay over time.

In a typical BNPL loan, a consumer might purchase a $500 item and pay it back in four equal installments, with the first installment paid as a down payment due at checkout, and the next three due in two-week intervals over six weeks.

The CFPB seems to be comfortable with that, but there are things that borrowers might not know going on inside the minutiae of a BNPL loan that concerns the agency.

First out of the CFPB’s chute of concerns are the inconsistent consumer protections BNPL loans offer. The agency found that while it’s standard for credit cards to offer protection, not all BNPL loans do. These include a lack of standardized cost-of-credit disclosures, minimal dispute resolution rights, a forced opt-in to autopay, and companies that assess multiple late fees on the same missed payment.

The second concern is data harvesting and monetization. With an eye toward the digital age and especially younger consumers, many Buy Now, Pay Later lenders have shifted their business models toward everything being done via an app, which the CFPB contends allows companies like Affirm, Afterpay, Klarna, PayPal, and Zip to build a valuable digital profile of each user’s shopping preferences and behavior. 

'Harvesting and monetizing consumer data'

“The practice of harvesting and monetizing consumer data across the payments and lending ecosystems may threaten consumers’ privacy, security, and autonomy,” the agency said. “It also may lead to a consolidation of market power in the hands of a few large tech platforms that own the largest volume of consumer data, and reduce long-term innovation, choice, and price competition.”

In addition to data accumulation, the CFPB said it’s concerned about debt accumulation, too – especially when it puts a consumer at risk of overextending a reasonable amount of credit. 

When the agency unpacked Buy Now, Pay Later procedures, it found that the process is “engineered” to encourage consumers to purchase more and borrow more. 

“As a result, borrowers can easily end up taking out several loans within a short time frame at multiple lenders or Buy Now, Pay Later debts may have effects on other debts. Because most Buy Now, Pay Later lenders do not currently furnish data to the major credit reporting companies, both Buy Now, Pay Later and other lenders are unaware of the borrower’s current liabilities when making a decision to originate new loans,” the agency said.

Is a reset necessary?

Even though Buy Now, Pay Later providers are subject to some federal and state oversight, the CFPB thinks there’s more that could be done to protect the consumer. The CFPB says it has enforcement authority over providers of credit, and it has authority to supervise any non-depository covered persons, such as a Buy Now, Pay Later provider, in certain circumstances. 

Protections vary from state to state, too. For example, some states do not require licensing or registration for Buy Now, Pay Later products with no interest or finance charges.

To try and keep BNPL from going off the rails any further, the CFPB said it will continue to address individual consumer harms as it finds them, then offer advice or issue rules to ensure that Buy Now, Pay Later lenders adhere to many of the baseline protections that Congress has in place for credit cards.

As part of this review, the CFPB said it is committed to guaranteeing that Buy Now, Pay Later lenders – just like their credit card company next of kin – are subjected to appropriate supervisory examinations.

Consumers who think that Buy Now Pay Later (BNPL) loans are a perfect way to buy something on time should perhaps think a little more. After seeing BNPL gr...

Article Image

FTC says Credit Karma misled consumers with allegedly false 'pre-approved' credit offers

Halloween’s still far away, but some Credit Karma users have already got a treat they weren’t exactly asking for. The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) says that the free credit and financial management platform tricked consumers with allegedly false “pre-approved” credit offers, only to wind up denying a third of those.

Credit Karma wasn’t just throwing out the occasional come-on, either. The FTC said the company deployed “dark patterns,” including claims that a consumer’s odds were 90% that they would be approved if they applied for the offers they were presented. Unfortunately, in some of those instances, Credit Karma dangled that carrot in front of consumers who had no chance of being approved.

The agency’s order requires Credit Karma to pay $3 million that will be sent to consumers who wasted time applying for these credit cards and to refrain from making deceptive claims.

A war of words

“Credit Karma’s false claims of ‘pre-approval’ cost consumers time and subjected them to unnecessary credit checks,” said Samuel Levine, director of the FTC’s Bureau of Consumer Protection. “The FTC will continue its crackdown on digital dark patterns that harm consumers and pollute online commerce.”

As you might expect, Credit Karma says the FTC has it all wrong.

“We fundamentally disagree with the FTC’s allegations about marketing terms that aren’t even in use anymore, but ultimately we reached this agreement to avoid disruption to our mission and maintain our focus on helping our members find the financial products that are right for them,” said Susannah Wright, chief legal officer at Credit Karma. “Our industry-leading technology provides the transparency our members need to shop for financial products with more confidence.”

The company went on to say that the FTC’s allegations are focused on Credit Karma’s historical use of the term “pre-approved” for a “small subset of the credit card and personal loan offers available on Credit Karma’s platform prior to April 2021.”

Approval odds?

In Credit Karma’s statement, the company said that the FTC’s allegations “do not challenge the approval odds language” it’s had in place since April 2021, including through the present.

But, if you ask ConsumerAffairs reviewers about their “approval odds” with Credit Karma, they have a different story – one that happened since April 2021, too.

“When you apply for the cards Credit Karma recommends for you under the heading of ‘Excellent Approval Odds,’ the benefits are explained such as 0% interest for 12 months, or a $200.00 bonus for your application, are modified and withdrawn once the application is submitted,” claimed Emily, of Macon, Ga., in her review of the company.

Emily’s not alone, either.

“Credit Karma and One Main listed me as having ‘outstanding ‘ approval odds of a $5500 loan at 11% interest. I was approved for the loan but when I spoke to the lender, they said 26% interest, not 11%,” wrote Mia of Franklin Tenn. 

“I would have never (have) dinged my credit report if I knew this was a possibility. I am livid. Do not ding credit based on the loan/credit card offers Credit Karma provides if you're [sic] biggest concern is the accuracy of the interest rates.”

Halloween’s still far away, but some Credit Karma users have already got a treat they weren’t exactly asking for. The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) says t...

Article Image

Consumers took out more credit cards and personal loans in the second quarter

With inflation shifting into overdrive during the second quarter of the year, consumers turned to credit cards and personal loans to help them get by. A new report suggests that lenders were happy to help.

TransUnion’s Q2 2022 Quarterly Credit Industry Insights Report shows that the number of consumers with credit cards and personal loans reached record highs, in part because lenders extended credit to more consumers in the subprime category.

Some personal finance experts might see that as a cause for concern in uncertain economic times, but Michele Raneri, vice president of U.S. research and consulting at TransUnion, says it’s not necessarily a red flag.

“Consumers are facing several challenges that are impacting their finances on a day-to-day basis, namely high inflation and rising interest rates,” Raneri said. “These challenges, though, are happening against a backdrop where employment opportunities are still plentiful and jobless levels remain low.”

Getting credit for the first time

Raneri says the fact that lenders are extending credit to more subprime borrowers – some of whom are getting credit for the first time – is actually a positive development. So far, she says the data doesn’t reveal any sign of trouble.

“While delinquencies generally rise after a period when more non-prime borrowers secure loans, the rates of delinquency remain mostly at or below pre-pandemic levels, particularly for cards and personal loans,” she noted. 

In the second quarter of the year, 161.6 million consumers had access to a credit card, up from 153.3 million a year earlier. Twenty-one million consumers had a personal loan during that period, an increase from 18.7 million in the second quarter of 2021.

The report shows that many of the new borrowers were among the youngest consumers. Loans to Gen Z consumers increased by 31.6% between the first quarter of 2021 and the first quarter of 2022. The subprime segment’s total balances grew by 51.7% year-over-year, which is the highest growth rate ever achieved. 

How to find the right loan

Consumers who are accessing credit for the first time should research both credit cards and personal loans before deciding which one meets their needs. Both are unsecured loans, but the interest rates can vary widely. The average interest rate on credit cards is currently around 20%, but it's much higher for consumers in the subprime category and those who are new to credit.

The interest rate on personal loans tends to be lower. The rate on personal loans could be as low as 6%, but it will be higher for consumers who are tapping into credit for the first time. Still, the rate on personal loans is usually lower than on credit cards.

ConsumerAffairs’ guide to “The Best Credit Cards” breaks down cards for different uses and different credit standings. There are also thousands of verified reviews.

Our guide to “The Best Personal Loans” provides hundreds of verified reviews about personal loan lenders and explains how they work. For example, personal loans are structured more like traditional loans than revolving credit, with set repayment terms.

With inflation shifting into overdrive during the second quarter of the year, consumers turned to credit cards and personal loans to help them get by. A ne...

Article Image

VantageScore will reportedly drop medical debt from credit score consideration

VantageScore, a provider of credit scores to lenders, has reportedly decided to drop medical debt from its calculations – a move that could raise many consumers’ credit scores.

The Wall Street Journal reports that the company’s move goes farther than those recently announced by Equifax, Experian, and Transunion – the three credit reporting agencies that jointly own VantageScore.

In March, the three credit reporting agencies announced that medical debt turned over to collections but later repaid will be removed from a consumer's credit report. Under current practices, it remains as part of a consumer's credit history.

The Journal reports that VantageScore is taking it a step further. The company will remove all medical collections from the data used to determine a credit score. Company executives told the Journal that it has found medical debts are not a good indicator of how consumers handle other debts.

Medical debt often can’t be avoided

According to the Kaiser Family Foundation, two-thirds of medical debts are the result of a one-time or short-term medical expense arising from an emergency or sudden medical need. After two years of the COVID-19 pandemic and a detailed review of the prevalence of medical collection debt on credit reports, all of the credit reporting agencies are now changing the way they view medical debt.

“Especially given the impact that Covid-19 had on consumers, having medical debt isn’t necessarily reflective of someone’s ability to pay back a loan,” VantageScore CEO Silvio Tavares told the news outlet.

VantageScore’s action expands on moves by its parent companies. In July, Equifax, Experian, and TransUnion began deleting information about medical bills sent to collections if the bills had later been paid. The three firms also put off including new unpaid medical debts to credit reports for a full year after being sent to collections. Previously, there was a six-month waiting period. 

Starting next year, the three credit reporting agencies said they would remove unpaid medical debt if it is less than $500. While it’s a step in the right direction, federal regulators say it doesn’t go far enough.

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) said the steps taken by the three credit reporting agencies probably won’t help that many people. In February, before the credit reporting changes took effect, the CFPB estimated that about $88 billion in medical bills were listed on 43 million credit reports.  

VantageScore, a provider of credit scores to lenders, has reportedly decided to drop medical debt from its calculations – a move that could raise many cons...

Article Image

Consumer debt rose by $312 billion in the second quarter

As inflation rose in the second quarter, so did consumer debt. The New York Federal Reserve reports that total household debt rose by $312 billion, or 2%, to reach $16.15 trillion.

That number includes mortgages, which increased by $207 billion and stood at $11.39 trillion as of June 30. More concerning was the growth in credit card debt.

The Fed’s report shows that balances recorded their biggest year-over-year percentage increase in more than twenty years. With inflation increasing each month, consumers may have been spending more but not getting as much for their money. For example, the average price of gasoline hit a record high of $5.01 a gallon during the second quarter.

So far, consumers appear to be able to handle the increase in debt. The Fed report shows that transitions into delinquency ticked up but remained very low when compared to historical levels.

Renters facing hardships

While some consumers aren't feeling the impact of rising debt, a report from Bank of America suggests consumers who rent their homes are facing rising economic pressure -- not just from inflation but also from a sharp increase in the average rent. Bank of America's internal data suggests that median rent payments increased by 7.4% year-over-year in July. 

According to internal Bank of America data, all income groups are feeling the impact of higher rents. The biggest increase in rent was among households with income between $51,000-150,000.

Younger consumers appear to be getting squeezed the most by higher rent inflation. The median payment was up 16% year-over-year in July for Gen Z. That compares to just 3% for baby boomers.

Reasons for optimism

The study’s authors say there are some reasons to remain positive about consumers’ ability to deal with inflation. They point out that gas prices declined in July and are still lower this month. At the same time, households are still socking cash away in savings accounts, with the savings rate still high and borrowing at normal levels.

Like the report from the New York Fed, Bank of America noted that credit card spending per household increased by 5.3% year-over-year but was down from 5.7% in June.  

“With U.S. Consumer Price Index (CPI) inflation at 9.1% in June and Personal Consumer Expenditure (PCE) inflation at 6.8%, it appears ‘real (inflation-adjusted) spending’ continues to be under pressure,” the authors wrote.

As inflation rose in the second quarter, so did consumer debt. The New York Federal Reserve reports that total household debt rose by $312 billion, or 2%,...

Article Image

Equifax admits to credit score mistakes for millions of consumers

Credit reporting company Equifax is facing serious blowback after it admitted that a “coding error” sent lenders erroneous credit scores for millions of consumers.

Out of the millions impacted by the mistake, some 300,000 consumers’ credit scores were off by 25 points from where they should have been. Equifax noted that those consumers were in the minority and only represent about 12% of all the credit scores released from March 17 to April 6.

The company said it’s been working with customers affected by the error, but officials did not go into specific details about how those issues would be fixed to rebalance the credit scores of those consumers.

“Obviously any data quality issue is a big issue for us. We take it very seriously, and it's one we are going to make sure we are going to fix," the agency stated.

Altering credit decisions

Twenty-five points might not seem like that much, but it's enough to push a score from "good" to "fair" -- and a "fair" credit score could cost consumers hundreds of dollars when applying for things like home mortgages.  

“We know that businesses and consumers depend on our data, and Equifax takes this technology coding issue very seriously. For those consumers that did experience a score shift, initial analysis indicates that only a small number of them may have received a different credit decision,” Equifax stated.

Equifax said it’s on track to move an additional 30% of Equifax environments to the new Equifax Cloud by the end of 2022. Officials say that should provide a better infrastructure with “better detective and preventive controls, which will be positive for both customers and consumers.”

Credit reporting company Equifax is facing serious blowback after it admitted that a “coding error” sent lenders erroneous credit scores for millions of co...

Article Image

Credit card lenders step up offers despite shaky economy

You may notice that you’re receiving more credit card offers in the mail. In spite of inflation and fears of a slowing economy, credit card companies are ramping up efforts to sign up new customers.

The Wall Street Journal reports that American Express, Capital One, and Discover have all committed new money to their marketing budgets, suggesting that executives at these lenders believe consumers will continue to spend.

In fact, consumers are still spending despite recession fears. JPMorgan Chase reports that consumers spent more than $271 billion using plastic in the second quarter. That’s 33% more than they spent in the fourth quarter of 2019, just before the COVID-19 pandemic.

Many consumers are charging more but not paying off the balance. VantageScore reports that Gen Z consumers increased credit card balances by 30% in the second quarter.

Check your credit

With banks so willing to lend, what should consumers look for when considering a new credit card? According to ConsumerAffairs' research, your current financial situation and credit history should determine the best credit card for you.

First, check your credit score. The cards with the best terms are usually reserved for consumers with good to excellent credit.

Next, think about how you will use the card. If you have a high-interest card with a balance, getting a balance transfer card with a long introductory 0% interest rate may be most advantageous.

Many credit cards offer generous rewards, but pending legislation could put those perks in jeopardy. A Senate bill would give businesses more credit processing options, which would likely reduce the fees credit card companies collect with each purchase.

Should the bill become law, Scott Lieberman, founder of TouchdownMoney.com, says there could be some unpleasant repercussions for consumers with generous rewards cards.

“Capping credit card fees may make issuers skittish about their lucrative rewards programs,” Lieberman told ConsumerAffairs. “They’ll need to reevaluate Customer Lifetime Value (CLV) for folks with rewards cards as the card fees paid by others might no longer be enough to offset the bonus programs.”

The interest rate may carry more importance

Every time the Federal Reserve hikes the federal funds rate, it puts upward pressure on credit card interest rates. If you think you’ll carry a balance, applying for a card with a low interest rate, or even a 0% introductory rate, might save more money than a cashback rewards card. A low credit score usually means a higher interest rate, but there are credit cards specifically marketed towards consumers with less-than-perfect credit.

Consumers who are rebuilding their credit might consider a secured credit card. The account is secured by an upfront deposit, which sets the credit limit. Just be sure that the card issuer reports payments to all three credit agencies. Not all secure lenders do.

Finally, when researching credit card offers, take advantage of ConsumerAffairs’ guide to the Best Credit Cards to help reach a decision.

You may notice that you’re receiving more credit card offers in the mail. In spite of inflation and fears of a slowing economy, credit card companies are r...

Article Image

Rocket Mortgage introduces new home equity loan

With inflation putting the squeeze on consumers, many are finding that their credit card debt is getting unmanageable. It’s especially difficult since interest rates tend to go up every time the Federal Reserve hikes the federal funds rate.

Applying for a balance transfer credit card with a year or more of 0% interest can help pay down credit card debt faster. As an alternative, Rocket Mortgage has introduced a new home equity loan that it says could save homeowners thousands of dollars if they used the equity in their homes to pay off their credit card balances.

"Our goal is to consistently create financial products that help our clients achieve their goals," said Bob Walters, CEO of Rocket Mortgage. "In the current market, short-term interest rates have risen sharply - making it much harder to pay off credit card debt. With our new home equity loan, clients can improve their lives by having a payment they can more comfortably afford."

Credit card interest is now averaging around 20%. The interest on a home equity loan is around 5%. Credit card debt is unsecured, so lenders charge more to cover their risk. A home equity loan is secured by the equity in the house. 

Americans have lots of home equity

According to the Federal Reserve, Americans currently have nearly $28 trillion in home equity. America’s total household debt stood at $15.84 trillion as of the first quarter of this year; that number is $1.7 trillion higher than it was at the end of 2019, before the COVID-19 pandemic. The Fed report also shows that credit card balances have risen since last year.

Rocket Mortgage says homeowners can access $45,000 to $350,000 of their home's equity in 10- or 20-year term, fixed-rate loans. The stipulation is that borrowers must maintain at least 10% equity in their homes. 

Because home equity loans are secured by the equity in a home, borrowers need to carefully consider all of the risks. The consequences of default are much higher than defaulting on a credit card bill.

To make it easier to understand home equity loans and pick the right lender, ConsumerAffairs has assembled an extensive guide here. To put it together, we reviewed the top lenders and compiled details about their loan packages. We also have thousands of verified consumer reviews about the top companies to help inform your research and choices.

With inflation putting the squeeze on consumers, many are finding that their credit card debt is getting unmanageable. It’s especially difficult since inte...

Article Image

Personal loan and mortgage rates fall as most other interest rates rise

The Federal Reserve’s meeting this week is almost certain to end with another large hike in a key interest rate. Meanwhile, rates on personal loans and mortgages – loans used by consumers – are falling.

Consumers with good credit scores received lower rates in the last seven days on both three- and five-year personal loans, according to financial website Credible.com. For example, consumers with a credit score of 720 or higher got a rate of 10.71% on a three-year personal loan, down from 11.01% a week earlier. Those applying for a five-year loan got an average rate of 13.59%, down from 13.81% the previous week.

Personal loans have become popular alternatives to credit cards because of their lower interest costs. The typical credit card carries an interest rate of around 20%, even for people with good credit scores.

Banks' lending costs rise every time the Fed raises its federal funds rate. Those costs are often passed along to borrowers – including those who carry a credit card balance. 

Mortgage rates also fell

Mortgage rates are also trending lower. According to Forbes, the average 30-year fixed-rate mortgage rate started this week at 5.73%, down from 5.88% a week earlier. Mortgage rates are not influenced directly by the Fed’s action but by the yield on the 10-year U.S. Treasury bond. That rate, which spiked in recent months and nearly doubled mortgage rates, has declined in the last week.

Consumers who are seeking either a personal loan or a mortgage should shop carefully among lenders for the best terms. Fortunately, researchers at ConsumerAffairs have done a lot of the leg work to help you make your decision.

The right personal loan lender may vary based on your credit score and how much you need to borrow. ConsumerAffairs vetted 24 loan companies with annual percentage rates (APRs) of less than 36% to help you make a choice. Check out our guide, with thousands of verified consumer reviews, here.

We have also assembled a comprehensive guide for choosing a mortgage lender. The ConsumerAffairs Research Team vetted 66 mortgage companies that were reviewed by more than 5,478 people in the last year. To find the best lender for you, read our guide to compare loan types, eligibility requirements, rates, and terms here.

The Federal Reserve’s meeting this week is almost certain to end with another large hike in a key interest rate. Meanwhile, rates on personal loans and mor...

Article Image

High gas prices mean stations “hold” more of your money when you pay with plastic

Gassing up the car for a Fourth of July road trip? Make sure you have plenty of money in your bank account or an ample credit limit.

It’s not just the cost of the fuel you have to worry about. When you use a credit or debit card at the gas pump, the gas station takes temporary possession of enough of your money or credit to cover even more than your purchase and holds it until the purchase settles.

With the price of gasoline and diesel fuel at record highs, The Wall Street Journal reports those “holds” can amount to $175. While most of the time the money is returned in a couple of hours, there are cases where it can take longer.

Visa and Mastercard began allowing the larger holds earlier this year when gas prices surged. At $5 a gallon, filling up a truck or SUV can cost over $100.

When gas prices were $3 a gallon or less, the holds were much smaller. Now that the price is over $5 a gallon in several states, the larger hold on a debit card purchase could mean trouble if the consumer has $100 or less in their bank account.

“When you set a hold that is a high number, it increases the likelihood that a consumer will overdraft because of that hold,” Jeff Lenard, vice president of strategic industry initiatives at the Association for Convenience & Fuel Retailing, a trade organization, told the Journal. “However, if you set a number that’s too low, you also risk not getting paid for that transaction.” 

What to do

For consumers buying gas with a credit card — especially one with a low credit limit — there is a similar risk. A $50 gas purchase using a card with only $125 in credit limit remaining might seem safe, but it isn’t. The $175 hold, even for a couple of hours, will result in an overdraft charge.

Before you head out on a holiday trip that will require a refueling stop, it’s a good idea to check your bank balance if you’re paying with a debit card. By logging into your credit card account, you can make sure you have enough credit to cover the hold.

If you think you’re dangerously close to the edge, carrying plenty of cash to pay for fuel could offer some peace of mind.

Gassing up the car for a Fourth of July road trip? Make sure you have plenty of money in your bank account or an ample credit limit.It’s not just the c...

Article Image

Consolidating credit card debt can dramatically increase credit scores, study suggests

A new study suggests that consolidating credit card debt can be a shrewd move that can pay off in several ways. In addition to the belief that paying off bills in time can improve credit scores, LendingTree’s latest analysis of the yays and nays of credit card consolidation found that those who consolidated at least $5,000 in credit card debt found their credit scores rose an average of 38 points in as little as a month. 

In fact, the study concludes that the more credit card debt someone pays down with a personal loan, the higher their credit score jumps. Let’s say you pay down $10,000 or more in credit card debt. In that case, credit scores go up an average of 49 points. The inverse is true, as well. The study found that taking out a loan to pay down anywhere from $1,000 to $5,000 in credit card debt, borrowers gained an additional 17 points, on average, in a single billing cycle.

While taking out a personal loan to pay down credit card debt can seem a bit like robbing Peter to pay Paul, LendingTree chief credit analyst Matt Schulz said it’s definitely worth the effort.

“A higher credit score is a big, big deal because there are few things in life that are more expensive than crummy credit,” Schulz said. “It can cost you thousands of dollars in the form of higher interest rates on loans, higher insurance premiums and more. It can even keep you from getting that new apartment you’re hoping to rent.”

But Schulz cautioned that even though credit card debt consolidation will likely cause someone’s credit score to go up, there’s more upside to eliminating debt altogether.

“Eliminating that debt can be nothing short of life-changing,” Schulz said. “It can free you up to build an emergency fund, save more for retirement, work toward buying a home or paying for your kids’ college. It’s a big, big deal.”

Where to get the consolidation loans and what to consider

Schulz said that for consumers who have the highest incomes and the best credit scores, getting a personal loan from a bank is the best way to go. “These are probably folks with significant experience with lenders and at least a few other items on that credit report. Those folks have a lot of other data points on their credit report that are influencing their credit score, so one change, even a big one like paying down all that debt, may not be as impactful for them as it would be for someone newer to credit,” he said.

ConsumerAffairs investment advisor Barbara Friedberg agreed. She said that the most clear-cut way to obtain a debt consolidation loan is through a bank or other debt consolidation lending institution. 

Friedberg said that if consumers can’t – or don’t want to – go the bank route, there are three other ways to get out of credit card debt.

0% balance transfer card: Balance transfer credit cards allow consumers to consolidate their debt by transferring the debt of multiple credit cards to one balance transfer card. Friedberg notes that some of those cards include 0% interest offers along with sign-up bonuses and cash-back rewards.

Home equity loan: “Homeowners can take out an amount of money based on the equity they have in the home, determined by the amount of money paid into the mortgage over the value of the home,” Friedberg said, adding that a home equity loan can be taken out to make home improvements, pay large bills or settle other debts.

401(k) loan: One unique approach Friedberg offered is for people who have a 401(k) set up through their employer. For those folks, they can borrow against that account. “Because a 401(k) is a personal retirement savings account, this is essentially borrowing from yourself. Because you’re withdrawing money from an account, not borrowing new money, a 401(k) loan will have no impact on your credit score. 401(k) loans typically require full repayment within five years,” she said

That 401(k) loan idea comes with a warning flag, though. Friedberg said that, most likely, there will be a small interest tacked onto a person’s repayment plan, and they also risk hurting their overall retirement savings plan. For those whose jobs may be shaky, Friedberg raised her warning a little higher. “If you lose your job, you’ll be required to pay back the 401(k) loan by the time your federal income taxes are due for the year,” she said.

A new study suggests that consolidating credit card debt can be a shrewd move that can pay off in several ways. In addition to the belief that paying off b...

Article Image

Consumers increased their spending in May

The Bank of America Institute reports that Bank of America customers with debit and credit cards increased their spending by 9% in May. On the surface, that looks like good news.

But a closer look suggests that consumers aren’t necessarily spending more on discretionary items. In many cases, they’re simply spending more to buy the same amount of gasoline and groceries.

For example, spending at the gas pump as a share of total card spending surged to 7.8% for the week ending May 28, up from 6.4% in February. For households earning less than $50,000 a year, the average share of gas spending rose to 9.5%.

"Our card data shows continued growth in consumer spending, but inflation is challenging households' purchasing power," said David Tinsley, senior economist for the Bank of America Institute. "That said, spending on services like travel and entertainment remained strong and households continued to have higher savings than they did before the pandemic. Overall, we still remain cautiously optimistic for the U.S. consumer."

Economic ‘perfect storm’

Sajan Devshi teaches business and economics and operates Learndojo.org. He says the economy faces a “perfect storm” of consequences beyond the control of policymakers.

“Inflation has skyrocketed due to the huge amounts of money injected into the world economies due to COVID-19 across the globe,” Devshi told ConsumerAffairs. “When you have an over-supply of currency pumped in with low levels of productivity, which is effectively what happened with COVID as many businesses were unable to operate, inflation increases exponentially and we are seeing this globally now.”

While inflation was rising in late 2021, the Russian invasion of Ukraine and resulting sanctions on Russian oil this year sent oil prices spiraling out of control. The resulting jump in gasoline prices has been a major driver of inflation.

“Gas and energy prices play a huge role in the structure of the modern economy,” Yoni Mazor, chief growth officer at GETIDA, told us. “The prices of driving cars, booking flights, shipping products, and much more get greatly affected by the rise of gas prices. This is definitely contributing to the overall level of inflation and hits the pockets of consumers and their daily spending in many ways.”

Inflation, meanwhile, shows no sign of slowing down. On Friday, the Labor Department reported that consumer prices increased 1% from April to May and are 8.6% higher over the last 12 months.

The Bank of America Institute reports that Bank of America customers with debit and credit cards increased their spending by 9% in May. On the surface, tha...

Article Image

Most credit card issuers are failing to meet expectations, survey finds

There’s no question we are in turbulent economic times. Inflation is at a 40-year high, and shortages of everything from cars to baby formula are keeping consumers on edge. 

A new survey suggests that consumers expect help from their credit card companies and digital payment apps but don’t feel they are getting it. According to a series of recent studies of bank and credit card mobile apps and online users by J.D. Power, overall satisfaction with most digital channels has declined as usage has increased.

The studies tracked overall customer satisfaction with banking and credit card providers’ digital offerings. Jennifer White, senior consultant for banking and payment intelligence at J.D. Power, said they reveal a lot of volatility in customer satisfaction scores.

“Based on their experiences with other consumer apps and websites that anticipate their needs and offer a highly personalized customer experience, bank and credit card customers are expecting more from their digital solutions,” White said. “The tough economic climate has amped up the urgency of those expectations.”

Decline in financial health

In less than a year, the percentage of consumers who could be defined as “financially healthy” has dropped 10 percentage points, to 43% from 53%. The percentage of consumers identified as “financially vulnerable” has increased to 32% from 25%. Bank customer satisfaction scores are 113 points lower, on average, among financially vulnerable customers than among financially healthy customers, the survey found.

Customers appear to be more satisfied with banks’ websites than with their apps. Website satisfaction scores improved slightly, but satisfaction with apps plunged by 17%.

Among national banks, Capital One ranked the highest in banking mobile app satisfaction, followed by Chase and Wells Fargo. Discover ranked the highest in credit card mobile app satisfaction, followed by American Express.

ConsumerAffairs reviewers weigh in

Among consumers posting reviews at ConsumerAffairs, here’s how reviewers generally rate those five companies using our 5-star rating system:

  • Capital One - 3.8 stars
  • American Express - 3.3 stars
  • Wells Fargo - 3.2 stars
  • Chase - 3.0 stars
  • Discover - 3.0 stars

Nathaniel, of Sayre, Penn., recently posted a ConsumerAffairs review of Capital One that reflects what the JD Power surveys found.

“I would start by saying Capital one is the best card company out there for the middle-class struggling trying to repair their credit,” Nathaniel told us. “I found them to be the best for me. No annual fee. A little high on the interest side but approved is what we all want. A fresh start. A chance for the hardworking American. I have always been approved when others say sorry.”

The J.D. Power surveys identified one key area where banks can improve their scores. The authors recommend that banks need to find ways to increase personalization for app users.

Among retail bank customers who visit their bank’s branch, 73% say they have a personal relationship with that bank. Among those who primarily use the bank’s digital channels, that percentage falls to 53%.

There’s no question we are in turbulent economic times. Inflation is at a 40-year high, and shortages of everything from cars to baby formula are keeping c...

Article Image

Key Bank says its customers’ credit scores have risen

Key Bank reports that another 4,343 of its customers have moved from a secured credit card to a traditional account after they were able to significantly raise their credit scores.

Since 2018, the bank has operated a program in which consumers with poor or no credit can build up their credit standing through the use of a secured credit card. This is important because many of these consumers would otherwise be unable to qualify for a credit card.

A secured card works the same way that a regular credit card does, but there's one big difference. With a traditional “unsecured” card, the lender has no collateral in case of default. 

To open a secured credit card account, a consumer deposits a sum of money – often around $500 – into a bank account to serve as collateral in the event of default. They make purchases with the card and, if they pay their bills on time, earn points with the credit reporting agencies. In the process, they also tend to develop good financial habits.

Among the latest group of “graduates,” Key Bank says 69% had no FICO credit score at the time that they opened an account. Another 31% were designated as having low FICO scores at origination. At the end of the program, the bank says the average improvement in credit score for those in the low category was 81 points.

"Our graduates are in a greater financial position coming out of this program," said Mitch Kime, KeyBank executive vice president of Consumer Client Growth. "With their newly improved standing, they are better positioned in applying for loans, more banking opportunities, and in some cases, better insurance rates. All of it adds up substantially towards creating a financially healthy life for themselves."

Shop carefully

Many other banks offer secured credit cards, but consumers should shop carefully because some may carry much higher fees than others. Danni White, a member of the ConsumerAffairs credit card research team, says a secured credit card can be a useful tool for a significant portion of the population.

“If your credit score is too low for you to get approved for a personal credit card, then a secured credit card might be your path to rebuilding your credit history,” she wrote.

Secured credit cards are available with no annual fee. However, these cards tend to have interest rates that are greater than 20%, even though the account is secured and there is no risk to the lender.

That should encourage users to pay the account in full each month. That helps save money on interest charges while helping to develop good financial habits.

Key Bank reports that another 4,343 of its customers have moved from a secured credit card to a traditional account after they were able to significantly r...

Article Image

Credit card rates expected to hit record of 19% on average

The Federal Reserve has begun to raise its federal funds rate, one of the reasons Wall Street is in the midst of a tailspin. But the change in policy is also affecting consumers who have run up large credit card balances.

Credit card interest rates move in sync with that key interest rate, and those already-high credit card rates have begun to move even higher. The experts at Bankrate predict that the average credit card interest rate will hit a record of 19% later this year.

Rising rates mean the minimum payment that cardholders must pay each month will likely also go up. Credit card companies charge between 1% and 5% of the balance as a minimum payment.

Only paying the minimum payment each month means most of the payment goes to interest, extending the time it will take to pay the balance down to zero. When the interest rate goes up, even consumers paying more than the minimum will face a longer payoff period.

According to personal finance experts, credit card debt is one of the biggest obstacles to building wealth. It can make it more difficult to purchase a home or pay for an emergency expense.

Lock up the cards

Jay Zigmont, a certified financial planner and founder of financial advisory company Live, Learn, Plan, says literally locking your credit cards away can help get you on the right track.

“When you don't have debt as an option, you are required to live within your means,” Zigmont told ConsumerAffairs.

To live within your means, Zigmont says you need a budget. It’s important that the budget is tailored to the individual and prioritizes “needs” over “wants."

“You need a roof over your head and basic transportation,” he said. “You may want a nicer house or a new car. Watch out for things that you 'feel you deserve.' Most often when people say they 'deserve' more, it is because of outside influences including friends, family, and social media.”

Paying off new credit card charges in full each month is also necessary to avoid expensive debt. Consumers who are already struggling with a credit card balance can pay it down faster by transferring the balance to a credit card that charges no interest for a year or more.

Check out ConsumerAffairs' guide to the best balance transfer cards for more information.

The Federal Reserve has begun to raise its federal funds rate, one of the reasons Wall Street is in the midst of a tailspin. But the change in policy is al...

Article Image

Average interest rate on personal loans goes down

Mortgage rates are going up -- and thanks to Federal Reserve action, so are the rates on credit cards. But the average rate on personal loans is going down, according to Credible.com.

Last week, the average rate for qualified borrowers – those with a credit score of at least 720 – fell by 0.17% to 10.85%. In contrast, the average credit card rate for new accounts was 18.32% last month.

A personal loan is normally used to make a big purchase or consolidate high-interest debts, such as credit cards. The borrower seeks a specific amount of money that is paid back over a specified time period with a fixed monthly payment.

Unlike a mortgage, which can only be used to buy a house, or an auto loan, which can only be used to purchase a vehicle, personal loans can be used to buy a variety of things. That's why they have become a popular type of loan since they were introduced.

Cheryl Ann of Kalispell, Mont., turned to personal loan lender Best Egg late last year to get out from under high-interest debt.

“With the stress of Christmas and moving into a new home, credit card bills piling up caused spending $800 a month paying just for credit card bills,” Cheryl Ann wrote in a ConsumerAffairs review. Best Egg has taken that stress away with a personal loan. Something I can manage and get rid of my debt. The process was simple.”

Income and good credit are major factors

The rate that lenders charge for a personal loan is determined by several factors, including income. But the borrower’s credit score is a significant factor. The higher the credit score, the lower the interest rate. 

For example, Experian says a borrower with “super-prime” credit – a score between 781 and 850 – could get a rate as low as 6.59%. Someone with “deep subprime” credit – a score between 300 and 499 – would pay a rate of 15.3%, which is lower than many credit card rates.

That’s why it pays for borrowers to work on raising their credit scores before applying for a personal loan or any other type of loan. The easiest and most productive step is to pay all bills on time every month. Consumers who reduce their credit card debt, which will increase their amount of available credit, will also see an increase in credit scores. 

It’s also a good idea to obtain a copy of your credit report from all three agencies – Experian, Equifax, and TransUnion – and look for incorrect information that could be dragging down your score.

Mortgage rates are going up -- and thanks to Federal Reserve action, so are the rates on credit cards. But the average rate on personal loans is going down...

Article Image

Senators and retailers push back against credit card swipe fees

Credit card networks are raising “swipe fees,” a move that will increase costs for businesses and will almost certainly be passed along to consumers in this inflationary environment. However, the networks are getting pushback from retailers and members of Congress.

Executives from Visa and Mastercard appeared before a Senate committee this week to explain last month's increase in interchange fees, which are collected on every purchase to compensate banks for antifraud efforts and pay for rewards programs.

Officials from both companies said they are sensitive to the issues facing small businesses. Executives from Visa said the company is reducing fees for most small businesses, and Mastercard officials said they have reduced fees on transactions below $5.

But industry estimates show that businesses that accept Visa and Mastercard will still pay more in fees. By some estimates, the increases could be as much as $475 million.

‘Sweetheart deal’

“The credit and debit card systems are not competitive marketplaces,” said Sen. Richard Durbin (D-Ill.), who wants new regulations to promote competition. “It’s a sweetheart deal for the dominant networks, for the biggest banks, and for certain cardholders who have ritzy rewards programs, but the average small business and the consumer, they pay the price.” 

The National Retail Federation (NRF) agrees. A representative of the trade group told the committee in a letter that businesses that accept credit cards – small businesses in particular – need more choices.

“Ongoing and unwarranted increases in swipe fees are especially damaging to small retailers,” NRF Chief Administrative Officer and General Counsel Stephanie Martz said. “We have heard many stories from small retailers about the extreme challenges posed by the current payments system and Visa and Mastercard’s continuing monopoly. It is small retailers who are calling for swipe fee reform more than any other segment of our industry.”

The pandemic’s effect

The pain small businesses feel may have increased significantly since the start of the pandemic. Since the spring of 2020, consumers have used payment cards more than cash. There was even a coin shortage that prompted consumers to use plastic if they didn’t have exact change. 

When a greater percentage of purchases are made with credit cards, a business pays a swipe fee on an increasing percentage of its sales, reducing its profit margin.

“When we first opened our business, credit card transactions accounted for approximately 40% of our business,” said John Morman, owner of Celtic Tides gift shop, in Lexington, Va. “Now the credit card share is about 80% of transactions.”

To make matters worse, Morman says the fees have risen and that the time taken before funds appear in his business’ account gets longer. 

Consumers are also shouldering part of that burden. The NRF estimates that the average American family pays over $700 a year in price hikes that businesses impose to cover swipe fees.

Credit card networks are raising “swipe fees,” a move that will increase costs for businesses and will almost certainly be passed along to consumers in thi...

Article Image

Mastercard is teaming up with Microsoft to improve online shopping

Online shopping is convenient for consumers, but criminals like it too. Since they don’t need to physically possess a stolen credit card, they can easily make what appears to be legitimate purchases if they have a consumer’s credit card information, which is often bought and sold on the dark web.

To combat the problem, Mastercard is teaming up with Microsoft on a new technology to more easily verify that the purchaser is who they say they are. The companies say merchants will lose less money to fraudsters and consumers will enjoy a more seamless transaction experience.

According to the companies, a digital fraud that has emerged in recent years is “first-party fraud.” That’s when a legitimate purchase is made online but then later disputed. First-party fraud is estimated to cost merchants worldwide as much as $50 billion.

"Shopping online should be simple, quick and secure but that isn't always the case,” said Ajay Bhalla, president, Cyber and Intelligence at Mastercard. “We're committed to developing advanced identity and fraud technology to help enhance the real-time intelligence we provide to financial institutions around the globe. This builds on our longstanding commitment of working across the industry to provide advanced technologies that enable trust, and help build a safe and thriving digital ecosystem for all."

Digital Transaction Insights

Mastercard says it has already taken steps in that direction. It has combined its Digital Transaction Insights solution with next-generation authentication that allows for real-time decision-making.

That system links Mastercard's network insights with the merchant's own data to confirm that the consumer is who they claim to be. It also provides financial institutions with additional intelligence needed to optimize their authorization decisions.

For consumers, it could mean fewer texts from their credit card company asking if they made a particular purchase. Mastercard says Digital Transaction Insights is already used across a wide range of online checkout functions, from click-to-pay transactions to digital wallets.

Microsoft brings its Dynamics 365 Fraud Protection to the table. Its proprietary risk assessment leverages adaptive AI to enable real-time fraud detection by identifying risky behaviors.

According to Microsoft, this will help credit card issuers make better decisions when it comes to requests for authorizations, chargebacks, and refunds. The result, it says, is a smoother process for consumers and fewer losses for merchants.

Online shopping is convenient for consumers, but criminals like it too. Since they don’t need to physically possess a stolen credit card, they can easily m...

Article Image

CFPB sues TransUnion for allegedly deceiving consumers

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) has filed a lawsuit against one of the three largest U.S. credit reporting agencies, TransUnion, for violating a 2017 order that is intended to protect consumers from deceptive marketing tied to their credit scores.

The agency claimed that even though TransUnion agreed to stop duping consumers four years ago, it disregarded the order’s stipulations and instead continued employing “deceitful digital dark patterns” in order to sweeten its revenue stream to the tune of $3 billion for 2021. Its complaint alleges that TransUnion also violated other consumer financial protection laws, such as the Fair Credit Reporting Act and the Electronic Fund Transfer Act.

“TransUnion is an out-of-control repeat offender that believes it is above the law,” said CFPB Director Rohit Chopra. “I am concerned that TransUnion’s leadership is either unwilling or incapable of operating its businesses lawfully.”

In response to the suit, TransUnion said it made efforts to appease the CFPB.

"Despite TransUnion’s months-long, good faith efforts to resolve this matter, CFPB’s current leadership refused to meet with us and were determined to litigate and seek headlines through press releases and tweets. The CFPB’s unrealistic and unworkable demands have left us with no alternative but to defend ourselves fully."

Failure to maintain consumer trust

Consumers typically feel that they can count on credit reporting agencies to create accurate credit reports to help banks, credit card companies, and other lenders ascertain how creditworthy they are and how much debt they can safely handle. However, the CFPB cites consumer reports in saying that TransUnion has struggled to maintain that trust. At least one ConsumerAffairs reviewer feels the same way.

“I got on the Transunion website to access my free credit report. But because of their deceptive website, I ended up signing up for a subscription that costs $25 a month without realizing it,” wrote Janissa from Wayan, Idaho.

“Nowhere on the page did it say anything about a charge. I thought I was just creating a free account in order to see my credit report. BEWARE when using Transunion!”

Trap doors and hidden tricks

What Janissa alluded to may be one of the “dark patterns” that the CFPB referred to. The agency said companies sometimes build in hidden tricks or trapdoors to get consumers to inadvertently click links, sign up for subscriptions, or purchase products or services. Worse yet, these dark patterns can complicate or hide information that makes it harder for consumers to do simple tasks like canceling a subscription service.

One example the agency gave relates to the free credit reports Americans are entitled to – in TransUnion’s case, annualcreditreport.com. Officials say TransUnion asked consumers to verify their identity by entering in information from a credit card on the site.

Where TransUnion crossed the line in the CFPB’s mind is that it then integrated deceptive buttons into the online interface that gave the consumer the impression that they could also access a free credit score on top of viewing their free credit report. But when reality kicked in, clicking that button actually signed consumers up for recurring monthly charges that used the credit card information they had provided.

Caught in TransUnion’s web?

The CFPB is seeking monetary relief for consumers, as well as compensation for unjust gains, injunctive relief, and civil money penalties. However, consumers need to know that the CFPB's action is not a final finding or ruling that the defendants have violated the law.

Individuals, including current or former employees, with information related to any misconduct by TransUnion can report it to the CFPB by e-mailing whistleblower@cfpb.gov or by calling the Whistleblower Tip Line at (855) 695-7974. You can learn more about being a whistleblower here.  

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) has filed a lawsuit against one of the three largest U.S. credit reporting agencies, TransUnion, for violat...

Article Image

Consumers went $42 billion deeper into debt in February

With inflation ratcheting higher to start 2022, a new report from the Federal Reserve shows consumers tapped into a massive amount of credit in February.

Consumer debt increased by almost $42 billion between January and February to a total of nearly $4.5 trillion. That works out to an 11.3% annual increase and far outpaces the 2.4% growth rate in January.

Not surprisingly, credit cards played a major role in the increase. The Fed’s report shows that revolving credit, which includes credit cards, increased by nearly 21% to about $1.1 trillion. Revolving credit debt rose by just 4% in January.

The growth in credit card debt just as inflation kicked into high gear may be an ominous sign.

Rod Griffin, senior director of Public Education and Advocacy at Experian, says it is easy for consumers to get overwhelmed by credit card debt if they don’t have spending under control, a task made harder by rising prices.

“This is a responsibility that always needs attention,” Griffin told ConsumerAffairs. “It is really difficult to build a plan to pay off debt or accumulate savings if you don’t know where your money is going and how much of it is available.”

Griffin says consumers should look at their debit and credit card statements, track their income and expenses, and automate savings if possible.

“If they cannot pay the balance in full each month, consumers should aim to keep their total credit card balance under 30% of their credit limit to maintain a good credit score,” he said.

Credit card rates are headed higher

The news may get worse in the months ahead. Even if consumers don’t increase their credit card debt beyond February’s surge the cost of servicing it will continue to rise. The Fed has signaled that its plans to continue raising the federal funds rate this year to combat inflation. Unfortunately, whenever that rate goes up, so do credit card interest rates.

WalletHub recently reported that the average credit card interest rate is 18.32% for new offers and 14.51% for existing accounts. Carrying a balance at those rates will make it difficult to pay off – especially since the average rate is expected to move even higher.

With inflation ratcheting higher to start 2022, a new report from the Federal Reserve shows consumers tapped into a massive amount of credit in February....

Article Image

PayPal launches new cash-back credit card

PayPal is rolling out a new credit card that pays cash back on purchases. The card, issued by Synchrony, provides unlimited 3% cash back when paying with PayPal at checkout.

The 3% reward is applicable for purchases made online, on a mobile device, or in-store with a PayPal QR Code. It pays unlimited 2% cash back on all other purchases anywhere Mastercard is accepted.

PayPal cites data showing that more than 60% of American consumers are now shopping both online and in-store across multiple spending categories. As their shopping patterns change from the pandemic, the company believes shoppers are eager to maximize rewards, especially now that inflation is on the rise.

The new card has no annual fee, no category restrictions, and can be added to a customer's PayPal wallet for use at checkout.

"Our customers shopped across 34 different categories last year showcasing the diversity of their needs and interests, and we wanted to build a credit product that was flexible and better matched rewards with their spending behaviors," said Susan Schmidt, vice president of Consumer Credit at PayPal. "The new PayPal Cashback credit card was designed so PayPal customers can earn rewards and get cash back for everyday purchases no matter what categories they spend in that month." 

PayPal's card evolution

PayPal’s digital wallet has always required users to have a credit card to which purchases can be applied. It wasn’t long before the company saw the value in supplying the credit card too.

PayPal and Synchrony signed a deal in 2018 to extend their existing co-brand consumer credit card program agreement, making the latter an exclusive issuer of the PayPal Credit online consumer financing program in the U.S. through 2028.

“Together with PayPal, we continue to build on the seamless integration that has been a hallmark of our partnership, allowing us to enhance rewards to our customers and improve the user experience," said Bart Schaller, CEO of the Digital Platform at Synchrony. "Plus, it's easy to use and manage – the new PayPal Cashback credit card is sure to be a customer favorite." 

The new card takes the place of the existing PayPal 2% Cashback credit card. Eligible cardholders will automatically be upgraded into the new 3% cash back card structure. The company says other consumers may apply using the PalPal app or at www.paypal.com/cashback.

PayPal is rolling out a new credit card that pays cash back on purchases. The card, issued by Synchrony, provides unlimited 3% cash back when paying with P...

Article Image

Consumer groups urge feds to regulate ‘buy now, pay later’ apps

When buy now, pay later (BNPL) services first appeared in the marketplace, many people praised them as a solution to mounting high-interest credit card debt. But now, at least 77 consumer and community groups are raising serious concerns.

The groups have signed a comment letter to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) and are asking it to provide oversight and regulation of these products. The letter warns that BNPL is contributing to an explosion in consumer debt.

“BNPL products have largely evaded oversight by federal and state regulators,” the groups stated. “Although these products could have a place in meeting consumer needs if they operate as promised, they pose a risk to consumers and should be covered by basic consumer protections.” 

How BNPL works

The theory behind BNPL is simple. Instead of putting a purchase on a credit card, adding to a high-interest balance, a consumer uses a BNPL app to finance the purchase. The consumer pays 25% as a down payment and makes three more payments every two weeks until the purchase is paid off.

But the consumer groups claim it isn’t working out that way for many BNPL users. The groups claim that within the industry, there is a lack of meaningful underwriting to determine if the consumer can afford the purchase.

In the letter to the CFPB, the consumer groups claim that some BNPL services have hidden fees and no clear disclosures. In short, the groups point out that debt is debt, and when consumers take on more than they can handle, they get in trouble.

“Marketing of Buy-Now-Pay-Later credit is enticing, with promises of instant approval and no impact on a consumer’s credit,” said the groups in the letter. “However, many providers are not conducting meaningful underwriting to assess a borrower’s ability to repay, allowing consumers to accumulate unaffordable amounts of debt.” 

Falling behind on payments

A September 2021, survey by Credit Karma found that 44% of Americans had used a BNPL plan. Of those consumers, 34% said they have fallen behind on payments.

Those missed payments have had significant consequences. Of those who admitted to having missed at least one payment, 72% said they believe their credit score declined as a result. Nearly a third said they experienced “significant” declines in their credit score.

ConsumerAffairs’ research team has reviewed the growing field of BNPL apps and identified a few of the top competitors. Commonly praised characteristics include a good online reputation, rate transparency, and a generous availability of services.

Some BNPL apps also don’t charge interest and set spending limits for users, based on their credit history. For example, Sezzle does a soft credit pull to determine if you qualify, so applying doesn’t affect your credit score.

When buy now, pay later (BNPL) services first appeared in the marketplace, many people praised them as a solution to mounting high-interest credit card deb...

Article Image

Robinhood launches debit card that helps users buy stock

Robinhood, the free stock trading app that rocked the stock market through much of 2021, is offering a new financial product aimed at millennials and others who are new to stock trading.

The company is launching a debit card that gives users the option of rounding up each purchase to the next dollar and depositing the change in an account that goes toward the purchase of an investment asset.

The company said it is introducing the Robinhood Cash Card as a means to help a new generation start investing while they are purchasing the things they need.

“The Cash Card builds on our mission to democratize finance for all by giving debit card customers the same benefits and rewards that were once reserved for credit card holders,” Robinhood wrote in a blog post.

Free stock proved popular

The company’s early efforts to entice young customers appear to have paid off. It recently launched a promotion that awards new account holders with a free share of stock – a promotion that resonated with Eric, of Winston-Salem, N.C.

“I like the fact that you get a free stock, but I would like to see some kind of tutorial or introduction to stocks,” Eric wrote in a ConsumerAffairs review. “For those of us who don't know anything about it but want to try it out. I really don't use it much anymore but it is a good platform to learn on your own without losing a ton of money. Most importantly it's free!!!” 

Jennifer, of Fresno, Calif., told us she thinks Robinhood is a good platform for investors, whether they are new to investing or not.

“What I think the best part is that they tell you whether professional analysts think it’s a good time to buy, hold or sell and what percentage of said analysts think so,” Jennifer wrote in her review. “For that reason, I give it two thumbs up.”

Cryptocurrency is included

Juan, of Astoria, N.Y., is generally pleased with Robinhood’s current offerings, especially information that might help make a good investment decision.

“They also show news about the economy and about the stocks you are buying, which is very helpful for deciding when to buy or sell, but the crypto market is very limited so may not be the right app for people looking for crypto,” Juan wrote.

Juan may be pleased to learn that the new debit card not only allows investments in equities but also in cryptocurrencies. Other benefits include a weekly bonus of 10% to 100% of the accumulated investment cash, capped at $10.

Robinhood gained popularity in early 2021 when stock traders, communicating on Reddit message boards used the app to bid up several beaten-down stocks like Gamestop, AMC, and Hertz.

Robinhood, the free stock trading app that rocked the stock market through much of 2021, is offering a new financial product aimed at millennials and other...

Article Image

Credit bureaus are changing the way they report medical debt

The three credit reporting agencies – Experian, Equifax, and TransUnion – have announced a change to consumers’ credit reports. All three companies will change the way they report medical debt collection.

If medical debt has been turned over to collections but is later repaid, the debt will be removed from the consumer's credit report. Under current practices, it remains as part of the consumer's credit history.

According to the Kaiser Family Foundation, two-thirds of medical debts are the result of a one-time or short-term medical expense arising from an emergency or sudden medical need. After two years of the COVID-19 pandemic and a detailed review of the prevalence of medical collection debt on credit reports, the credit agencies said they are making changes to help people focus on their personal wellbeing and recovery.

“Medical collections debt often arises from unforeseen medical circumstances. These changes are another step we’re taking together to help people across the United States focus on their financial and personal wellbeing,” said Mark W. Begor, CEO Equifax; Brian Cassin, CEO Experian; and Chris Cartwright, CEO TransUnion, in a joint statement. “As an industry, we remain committed to helping drive fair and affordable access to credit for all consumers.”

Widespread issue among consumers

An analysis of reviews posted at ConsumerAffairs shows that medical bills are a persistent source of financial trouble and a major drag on credit scores. In a review of Credit One Bank, Melissa, of Millsboro, Del., told us she was unhappy with the bank’s credit card because of an annual fee. However, she knew canceling it would harm her already damaged credit.

“Unfortunately, my credit is just being rebuilt because of medical bills and I have no choice but to pay the fee and keep the card for now,” she wrote in her review.

Shasta, of SeaTac, Wash., said she was in the same situation when she was unable to raise the limit on her Citi card because her previous 800-plus credit score was in a downward spiral.

“This was also the score range I maintained before losing my job and incurring medical bills beyond my ability to re-pay, resulting in being forced into bankruptcy,” Shasta told us.

Effective July 1

The change in credit reporting at all three agencies will go into effect on July 1, 2022. After that date, paid medical collection debt will no longer be included on consumer credit reports. 

The credit bureaus say they are also taking an additional step. The time period before unpaid medical collection debt would appear on a consumer’s report will now be increased from six months to one year to give them more time to work with insurance and/or health care providers to address their debt before it is reported on their credit file. 

In the first half of 2023, Equifax, Experian and TransUnion will also no longer include medical collection debt under at least $500 on credit reports.

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) has been critical of the way credit agencies have reported consumers’ medical debt, noting that millions of Americans have unexpectedly been hospitalized for COVID-19 and are taking on debt while they receive needed care. 

CFPB research has shown that Americans have accumulated at least $88 billion in medical bills since June, making medical debt the most common entry on credit credits. Independent research has also shown that medical debt is a major contributor to bankruptcy.

The three credit reporting agencies – Experian, Equifax, and TransUnion – have announced a change to consumers’ credit reports. All three companies will ch...

Article Image

Medical debt is becoming more of a burden on Americans, CFPB says

In a new study of consumer finances, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) found that medical debt is harming consumers' credit scores and adding significant amounts of money to their personal debt. 

The agency suggests that some 43 million Americans have medical debt on their credit reports, and that debt totals around $88 billion nationwide.

Medical-related debt isn’t something the average person plans for because it often comes about as a result of unexpected and emergency events. But when it does, it can hit hard and put Americans in a doom loop between their medical provider and their insurance company.

The CFPB says consumers often have to deal with aggressive debt collection and coercive credit reporting that forces them to pay medical bills they may not even owe. Once medical debt shows up on a credit report, the repercussions can be far-ranging and felt across all races and ethnicities, but most acutely by minority and low-income communities.

“These practices can impose serious costs on people’s financial, physical, and emotional health. Having a medical debt collection tradeline on a person’s credit record can make it harder to get credit, rent or buy a home, or find a job,” the CFPB stated in its report. 

“Some people are pushed into bankruptcy by medical bills that they cannot pay. Some avoid seeking health care out of fear of medical debt. And some find that the stress of having medical debt—and being contacted by medical debt collectors – worsens their mental health, contributing to conditions like anxiety, depression, and even suicide.”

What the CFPB is doing about the situation

Armed with data from the new study and efforts from states to protect patients from staggering medical bills, the CFPB has decided it needs to step up its efforts to ensure consumer credit reporting is not used overbearingly to force patients and their families to to pay debatable medical bills. Specifically, the agency intends to address the following factors:

Reasonable practices: The agency wants to ensure that credit reporting companies have reasonable procedures in place to keep medical debt information accurate. It plans to take action against furnishers who report inaccurate information.

No surprises: The CFPB says it will support the work of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services to ensure that patients are not coerced into paying bills in excess of the amounts due. That's especially true in situations where the billed amount violates the No Surprises Act. That act protects consumers who are covered under group and individual health plans from receiving surprise medical bills from most emergency services and non-emergency services from out-of-network providers at in-network facilities.

Tell consumers what financial assistance is available: Regulators will investigate how best to facilitate patients’ access to financial assistance programs offered by medical providers, including at the point of collection and credit reporting.

Continue researching the situation: The CFPB says its latest study is just a start and that it will conduct additional research on medical billing collection practices and their impact on patients and families.

Look for ways to end the current problem: Finally, the agency said it will determine whether policies should be implemented to eliminate unpaid medical billing data on credit reports altogether.

Extra expert advice

ConsumerAffairs reached out to Stephanie Genkin, a medical debt expert, to get her take on the CFPB’s report. She assures consumers that medical debt is given less weight on credit reports than other kinds of delinquencies. However, she said there are three things people can do when facing medical cost issues:

  • Don't argue with the debt collector. Ask for written confirmation of the debt so you can dispute it if it is inaccurate.

  • Negotiate a reduced payment. Debt collection agencies buy medical debt for pennies on the dollar, so consumers can often try to work with collectors to reduce the burden of their debt.

  • Try a "pay to delete" strategy. Genkin says consumers can get written confirmation that a collector will notify all three credit reporting agencies to delete the reporting of their debt once it is paid off.

In a new study of consumer finances, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) found that medical debt is harming consumers' credit scores and adding...

Article Image

Small businesses are struggling to pay credit card swipe fees

Amazon and Visa reached a truce on credit card swipe fees this week, an issue that had the two industry leaders at odds in the U.K. through most of 2021.

If the service fees are an issue for a major player like Amazon, imagine what they are for small businesses that may still be struggling from the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic. At Giovani’s restaurant in suburban Richmond, Va., a sign implores customers to pay in cash, claiming that swipe fees are greater than the restaurant’s rent during many months.

Louis Hoch, president and CEO of payment solutions firm Usio, Inc., says the problem for small businesses can be traced to the pandemic, which he says changed how consumers make their purchases.

“Consumers preferred using cards for payments than handling cash that they perceived might carry the infection,” Hoch told ConsumerAffairs. “Overall, the merchants experienced higher card usage for payment of their services and, as a result, their processing volume increased which also increased their payment processing expense.”

Fee increase in April

But the worst may be yet to come for small businesses that accept credit cards. Cindy Smith, head of Payments at payment network Veem, said the credit card processors postponed an increase in swipe fees that would have gone into effect last year. Those increases take effect in April.

Unless consumers begin making more cash purchases, small businesses will face higher costs. But Smith believes the shift to electronic payments is deeply embedded.

“I think long-lasting changes that altered the way people pay and get paid will continue to stick around long after COVID,” she told ConsumerAffairs.

Consumers could pick up the bill

Caught between credit card swipe fees and rising inflation, some small businesses may feel stuck. If they raise prices, they risk losing customers. So some are rewarding customers who pay in cash.

Others, according to Money magazine, are asking their customers to pay their swipe fees by tacking on a service charge on credit card purchases. These fees typically range from 1.5% to 3.5%.

While some consumers may start making more trips to the ATM to take advantage of cash discounts, Kelsey Sheehy, small business specialist at NerdWallet, doesn’t see that as a trend, especially since so many transactions are now completed online.

“In-person payments…plunged during the pandemic, falling from 91% to 34% between October 2019 and April 2020,” Sheehy said. “While face-to-face transactions have rebounded to some degree, shoppers are still reaching for their credit cards and smartphones over cash.”

Amazon and Visa reached a truce on credit card swipe fees this week, an issue that had the two industry leaders at odds in the U.K. through most of 2021....

Article Image

Bank of America introduces new payment system for online purchases

Amid competition from fintech firms, Bank of America – one of the largest credit card issuers in the U.S. – is introducing a new way to pay for things.

The company is rolling out its new online payment solution called "Pay by Bank." The new feature allows consumers who are making online purchases to pay directly from their bank accounts instead of using a credit card or debit card. 

The company says Pay by Bank transactions are based on the concept of “open banking.” They take place in real-time and require no credit card or debit card details. Bank of America says this makes online checkout simpler, faster, and more secure.

Bank of America seems to have a pretty good reputation among consumers for its security. Hector, of Las Vegas, told us he’s pleased with how Bank of America handles the security of his credit card account.

“Card controls are excellent because you can stop any online or atm activity anytime,” Hector wrote in a ConsumerAffairs review. “I feel my account is safe. You can only access account info from your own device.”

No storage of customer data

Bank of America says Pay by Bank is even safer than payment card transactions because there is almost no storage of customer data. Because a card is not required and it is an online “account to account” payment, companies do not need to obtain and store customer card data.

The system leverages the customer's bank authentication network for added security. And as a bonus for consumers, the transaction does not levy a card processing fee.

The system is rolling out first in the U.K., but it will be available in the U.S. in the months ahead. Once it is fully implemented, many e-commerce merchants will offer Pay by Bank at checkout. After selecting that option, the customer authenticates the payment by using their existing login credentials through their online banking platform.

Once authenticated, the payment is sent directly from the customer's bank to the company's account. The customer is returned to the checkout page and the transaction is complete.

"The launch of Pay by Bank is part of our continuous cycle of technology investment that helps us to keep clients at the cutting edge," said Matthew Davies, co-head of Global Corporate GTS Sales and head of GTS EMEA at Bank of America. 

Davies predicts that Pay by Bank will make online shopping easier and more secure for consumers while helping merchants set themselves apart from their competitors.

Amid competition from fintech firms, Bank of America – one of the largest credit card issuers in the U.S. – is introducing a new way to pay for things....

Article Image

U.S. households increased debt by $1 trillion in 2021

Americans borrowed money at a near-record pace in 2020, just a year after they sharply reduced credit card debt. A report by the New York Federal Reserve found that all types of household debt, from mortgages to auto loans and credit card balances, ballooned by $1 trillion, the largest increase in 14 years.

In addition to mortgage growth, the report showed that auto loan originations were big drivers of household debt. That, in turn, is a product of inflation. As the prices of new and used vehicles have surged since the start of the pandemic, consumers have often taken on more debt to purchase a car or truck.

Largest increase since 2007

Mortgage balances remain the largest component of household debt, rising by $258 billion. Credit card balances increased by $52 billion, while student loan debt actually declined by $8 billion, remaining roughly flat in nominal terms at the end of 2021 after almost two decades of steady increases.

"The total increase in nominal debt during 2021 was the largest we have seen since 2007," said Wilbert Van Der Klaauw, senior vice president at the New York Fed. "The aggregate balances of newly opened mortgage and auto loans sharply increased in 2021, corresponding to increases in home and car prices."

The report’s authors say new extensions of installment credit were at historically high levels in 2021 for both mortgages and auto loans. They note that mortgage originations were at $1 trillion in the fourth quarter of 2021. It contributed to a historic high in annual terms, with over $4.5 trillion in mortgages having originated over the course of 2021.

Managing debt is key

How consumers manage that debt may determine whether an increase in loan volume is a threat to the economy. After shopping around, Bob, of Annapolis, Texas, secured a debt consolidation loan through Sofi and is happy with the outcome.

“Got offers from other lenders at 20% or more (how does a D/C loan at 20% make any sense ?),” Bob wrote in a ConsumerAffairs review. “Sofi came through with an offer at a reasonable rate, much to my surprise, and I jumped on it. All done through website and email. Speed, accuracy, easy.” 

The report found that more consumers like Bob may need help managing their debt, noting that the credit scores of newly originated mortgages have declined in recent quarters from the beginning of the pandemic.

However, average scores remain elevated and suggest that newly opened mortgages and a higher share of refinances appear to be solid. The volume of newly originated auto loans was $181 billion during the fourth quarter, primarily because consumers were forced to borrow more to purchase ever-more-expensive cars and trucks. 

The report found that aggregate limits on credit card accounts increased by $96 billion and now stand at $4.06 trillion, $160 billion above the pre-pandemic level.

Americans borrowed money at a near-record pace in 2020, just a year after they sharply reduced credit card debt. A report by the New York Federal Reserve f...

Article Image

Equifax finalizes data breach settlement with FTC and starts fulfilling claims

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has reached a settlement with the consumer credit reporting agency Equifax over a 2017 data breach in which hackers accessed the personal data of 147 million people.

The company has agreed to a global settlement with the FTC, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB), and 50 U.S. states and territories. The settlement includes up to $425 million to help people affected by the data breach.

What affected consumers will receive

The settlement administrator has already begun contacting those who filed valid claims, and Equifax has agreed to offer eligible claimants a free four-year membership in Experian IdentityWorks, an identity theft protection service. As a plus, Equifax also agreed not to require users to provide payment info to enroll, nor do they have to cancel the service when it ends.

All anyone who received a notice has to do is visit the Experian IdentityWorks website and enter the Activation Code from the email or letter they received. They can also call 1-877-251-5822.

Time is of the essence, though – the activation code has to be used by June 27, 2022, at the latest. 

The FTC also warns consumers to be on the lookout for scammers who might be trying to leverage the opportunity to get their hands on some personal data.

“Legitimate emails about this settlement will come from Equifax Breach Settlement Administrator,” the FTC said. “The administrator will not call you.”

Claiming expenses related to the data breach

Those who did not apply for the settlement still have an opportunity to do that. Consumers can file a claim for expenses incurred between January 23, 2020, and January 22, 2024, as a result of identity theft or fraud related to the breach. That includes any of the following:

  • Losses from unauthorized charges to your accounts.
  • Fees you paid to professionals, like accountants or attorneys, to help you recover from identity theft.

  • Other expenses you incurred while recovering from identity theft, like notary fees, document shipping fees, postage, mileage, and phone charges

To file an “extended period claim,” Equifax has set up a special website here that consumers can use.

Recovering from identity theft

The FTC went another step further in the consumer’s favor. The agency said those who never filed a claim for other benefits but were affected by the data breach and discovered misuse of their personal information can get free identity restoration services.

To access this benefit, all consumers have to do is use the look-up tool to confirm that they were affected by the breach. The confirmation page provides a phone number and engagement number to get free help with identity restoration.

For more information about identity theft, visit ConsumerAffairs' site here.

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has reached a settlement with the consumer credit reporting agency Equifax over a 2017 data breach in which hackers acce...

Article Image

Fed signals upcoming interest rate hike that will affect credit card rates

In addition to more expensive food and gasoline, the interest rate on your credit card balance could be going up soon. 

As it concluded its January meeting, the Federal Reserve Open Market Committee made clear that it plans to increase its federal funds rate, perhaps as early as March. The Fed has kept that rate near 0% since the early days of the pandemic.

Fed Chairman Jerome Powell said raising the rate is one of the tools that policymakers will use to bring down inflation, which is currently running hotter than the Fed would like.

“This is going to be a year in which we move steadily away from the very highly accommodative monetary policy that we put in place to deal with the economic effects of the pandemic,” Powell said at a Wednesday news conference. 

That message was clear for Wall Street, where stocks sold off sharply while Powell was taking questions from reporters. With higher interest rates, investors believe stocks can’t be valued at current levels.

Clear implication for consumers

For consumers with a credit card balance, the implications are also clear. While very few types of loans are linked to the Fed’s federal funds rate, the interest rates charged on credit card balances are. 

That means if you pay the same amount each month on your credit card bill, more of the payment will go towards interest and less will go towards paying down the balance. The Fed did not announce a rate increase at Wednesday’s meeting, but market analysts expect a rate hike to be announced at the Fed’s meeting in March.

Unfortunately, it’s not likely to be a single rate increase. If the goal is to tamp down inflation, a series of rate hikes may be required, eventually bringing the key interest rate back to around 1% – which is still very low by historical standards.

Rates won’t go up immediately

Credit cardholders may not notice the change right away. Usually, it takes a month or two for lenders to adjust their credit card rates, which are already among the highest interest rates that consumers face.

The average interest rate on credit card debt is currently around 18%. But that’s just the average rate – people with less-than-stellar credit can pay 25% or more in interest.

With credit card rate increases a few months away, now may be a good time to aggressively pay off balances. Using a balance transfer card that charges no interest for the first few months is a good way to make progress.

ConsumerAffairs’ Credit Card Buyers Guide is a good place to start when researching the best card to use for a balance transfer.

In addition to more expensive food and gasoline, the interest rate on your credit card balance could be going up soon. As it concluded its January meet...

Article Image

Experian to let consumers with no credit history write their own credit report

Many of us obsess over our credit scores. After all, those numbers are important when you buy a home, purchase a car, or apply for any kind of loan.

But some people don’t have a credit score because they have no credit history. They’ve never applied for a credit card and have no other types of debt. For these consumers, Experian – one of three credit agencies – will reportedly let them write their own credit report.

According to the Wall Street Journal, Experian’s new program is called “Go,” and it's similar to another program called Experian Boost. Boost links additional payment and banking information to help consumers raise their credit scores.

For example, if a person pays their electric bill and video streaming charges on time each month, that information – not currently part of a traditional credit report – is added to their history, thus raising their credit score.

Experian told the Journal that, on average, consumers who add non-debt accounts to their newly created credit reports go from having no FICO score to one of about 665. 

The program is designed to make “unbanked” consumers more visible to financial institutions and give them an improved chance of being approved for a loan. At the same time, Experian benefits by having more data on more consumers.

Good results with Boost

Jairo, of Cleveland, Ohio, signed up for Boost and is glad he did.

“I personally increased my score by 40 points in my first 3 months," Jairo wrote in a ConsumerAffairs review. "You can optionally link your bank account for better results. By doing that I have increased my score by 19 points.”

Having a credit report can be a two-way street. It’s good if you have a good credit track record, but it's not so good if you aren’t careful with your money. Sholanda, of Browns Mill, N.J., tells us she worked with Experian to raise her 515 credit score.

“I had quite a few negative items,” Sholanda wrote in a ConsumerAffairs review. “After paying off some things and disputing items my score went up significantly.”

Craig Boundy, head of Experian North America, told the Journal that having credit information on more consumers makes the company more successful, not only in selling Experian services but also by offering credit cards that have the best chance for approval.

Many of us obsess over our credit scores. After all, those numbers are important when you buy a home, purchase a car, or apply for any kind of loan.But...

Article Image

Paying bills on time and managing debt can improve your credit score in 2022

A turn of the calendar often brings New Year’s resolutions, and improving credit scores often carries a big payoff in consumers’ financial lives. After all, credit scores determine what interest rate you get on mortgages and car loans. It can also determine whether you get the job or apartment you want and what kind of credit card you carry in your wallet.

Knowing what impacts your credit score the most is useful information to have. Rod Griffin, senior director of consumer education and advocacy for Experian, says paying your bills on time and managing debt are two of the biggest factors credit agencies consider.

“The most important thing you can do to maintain or improve your credit scores is to pay your bills on time and keep your credit card balances low,” Griffin told ConsumerAffairs. “Your payment history and credit utilization rate are the two most important factors used to determine your credit score. Catching up on missed payments is the single most important thing you can do to improve your credit scores.”

Keep an eye on credit utilization

Michael, of Littleton, Colo., saw his FICO score drop 19 points after he accepted a credit card solicitation from Chase Bank. In hindsight, he should have considered a card with a higher debt limit.

“My credit limit on that particular card was $1200,” Michael wrote in a ConsumerAffairs review. “Several months later, I decided to use the Chase Bankcard for an online purchase of $359.”

That’s when Michael saw his score drop. It likely had something to do with the fact that the single purchase utilized 30% of his available credit on that particular card.

“Credit card debt impacts your credit utilization rate, which can have a significant effect on your credit score,” Griffin said. “Carrying high credit card balances raises your credit utilization rate, which will bring down your credit scores. On the flip side, keeping your credit card balances low reduces your credit utilization rate, which is a good thing and will have a positive impact on credit scores.”

Pay off the balance every month

Some people who use a credit card for all their monthly purchases make multiple payments each month in order to keep the balance low. Griffin said that really isn’t necessary if you pay off the entire balance when the bill arrives.

“The balance on the billing statement is typically the balance shown in your credit history,” Griffin said. “Paying prior to the end of the billing cycle may reduce the amount shown on the billing statement and that is reported in your credit history. That may reduce your overall utilization rate. Generally, paying the balance in full each month will ensure the best outcome for credit scores.”

In 2018, Experian launched a program called Experian Boost. Participating consumers can get credit for timely payments for bills on cell phones, utilities, and video streaming services – payments that are not typically reported to credit agencies. But for anyone trying to improve their credit standing in 2022, Griffin says consistency is the key factor when it comes to paying bills on time and keeping your balances low. 

A turn of the calendar often brings New Year’s resolutions, and improving credit scores often carries a big payoff in consumers’ financial lives. After all...

Article Image

Bank of America beefs up its rewards programs

While the credit card market seems to get a new rewards card every month or so, Bank of America is beefing up the perks across its portfolio of credit card and other financial services products.

“Our Preferred Rewards program is designed to encourage our clients to bring more of their financial lives to Bank of America,” John Sellers, rewards executive at Bank of America, told ConsumerAffairs. 

At the top, the bank has added new tiers of rewards for high net worth and ultra-high net worth clients. Among the rewards are mortgage and home equity rate discounts. They also get access to a 75% credit card reward bonus.

“That means members can increase their rewards points from two per dollar on dining and travel purchases and earn up to 3.5 points per dollar unlimited,” Sellers said. “This is on top of the additional rewards, such as no-fee services, rate boosters on savings accounts, and interest rate discounts on auto loans.” 

Retail, Preferred, Small Business, and Wealth Management clients qualify for tiered benefits based on the balances they maintain in their Bank of America deposit accounts and/or Merrill investment accounts, the company said.

An increase in points

Last month, Bank of America launched a new Premium Rewards Elite credit card offering a range of lifestyle and travel benefits designed to reward clients and complement cardholder spending habits. 

The base reward at launch was two points for every $1 spent on travel and dining. Cardholders can now earn 3.5 points per $1 spent on travel and dining purchases and 2.62 points per $1 spent on all other purchases when enrolled in the bank’s Preferred Rewards at the Platinum Honors, Diamond, or Diamond Honors tiers.

“The outstanding travel and lifestyle perks of Premium Rewards Elite make it an exciting addition to our suite of award-winning credit cards," said Jason Gaughan, credit card executive at Bank of America. "We're proud to offer this new card designed to further reward and enhance the client experience."

In the near future, Gaughan said Bank of America will launch Partner Rewards, a loyalty program available to its credit and debit cardholders that he says will provide greater flexibility in how clients redeem exclusive partner offers and rewards.

Once enrolled, cardholders can select the card that will be associated with the rewards program. It will also give cardholders more choices when it comes to how they receive rewards.

While the credit card market seems to get a new rewards card every month or so, Bank of America is beefing up the perks across its portfolio of credit card...

Article Image

Buy now, pay later purchases to begin showing on Equifax credit reports

Credit bureau Equifax has announced that it will begin including buy now, pay later (BNPL) payment information in its credit reports, a move that it says will expand credit for consumers.

The company said it acted after its research of anonymized consumer data from a BNPL provider showed that people who pay their BNPL loans on time could potentially increase their FICO Score – helping consumers to both build and rebuild credit.

"Equifax will be the first credit reporting agency to formalize a standard process for reporting BNPL tradelines for inclusion on traditional consumer credit reports," said Mark Luber, a top executive at Equifax. "We are committed to helping people live their financial best, and recognize the role that BNPL services can play in helping people build stronger financial profiles."

BNPL, also known as point-of-sale financing, is an increasingly popular way for consumers to access alternative financing options for online or in-store purchases. They typically involve short-term, interest-free installment payments offered at checkout.

Possible downside

Including these transactions on Equifax credit reports could have a downside if consumers who use BNPL financing don’t make payments on time. And there’s evidence that happens a lot.

A recent study by Credit Karma found that 44% of respondents had used BNPL services to make a purchase. Of those who have used BNPL services, 34% have fallen behind on one or more payments.

Younger consumers may be more likely to miss payments. According to the study, more than half of Gen Z and millennial respondents who have used BNPL services say they have missed at least one payment, compared to 22% of Gen X respondents and just 10% of baby boomers.

‘New version of old layaway plan’

With the increased use of BNPL services, regulators are concerned that consumers are taking on unmanageable debt. The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) has launched an investigation into how these programs affect consumers’ finances. In particular, the consumer watchdog wants to learn how payment providers use customer data.

“Buy now, pay later is the new version of the old layaway plan, but with modern, faster twists where the consumer gets the product immediately but gets the debt immediately, too,” said CFPB Director Rohit Chopra.

The CFPB stated that it has asked Affirm, Afterpay, Klarna, PayPal, and Zip to provide information so that the agency can report to the public about industry practices and risks. Typically, a BNPL service allows a customer to defer payment in full for a purchased item. The consumer usually pays 25% upfront and then pays 75% over two two-week intervals.

CFPB regulators say the ease of installment buying may encourage consumers to spend more money than they would otherwise.

Credit bureau Equifax has announced that it will begin including buy now, pay later (BNPL) payment information in its credit reports, a move that it says w...

Article Image

New store charge cards could negatively affect your credit score

Consumers shopping in a brick-and-mortar chain store this holiday season may be presented with an offer at checkout: Apply for the store’s charge card and receive an immediate discount on the purchase.

It might sound like a tempting deal, but there are a few things to consider first. The financial services firm myFICO says opening a new store charge account could negatively affect your credit score.

It’s a card you may only be able to use at the store in question. Since it isn’t getting regular use, myFICO says it’s easy to overlook a payment, and late payments can drag down your credit score. The credit limit may also be fairly low, so if that first purchase uses most of the available credit – and you carry a balance for a while – your credit score can take a hit.

Higher interest rates

Ted Rossman, a senior industry analyst at CreditCards.com, says there can be other drawbacks that make store cards less useful to consumers than a standard credit card. For one thing, he says store cards typically charge a higher interest rate.

“We recently averaged the midpoints of the APR (annual percentage rate) ranges offered by credit cards associated with the 100 largest retailers and came up with 24.35%, well above the 19.92% we measured on 100 popular general-purpose credit cards using the same methodology,” Rossman told ConsumerAffairs. “Both are high, but retail card APRs are often higher than general-purpose cards, and they top out at 29.99%.

Getting a small discount probably isn’t worth it

Rossman says store credit cards can make sense if you plan to pay in full to avoid the higher interest charges. But another consideration is how frequently the card will be used. And he agrees that there can be negative consequences to credit scores.

“Opening and closing too many credit card accounts can hurt your credit score, so be selective,” he said. “A 10% discount on a large purchase might make sense if you can avoid interest, especially if you’re loyal to the store and will get ongoing benefits. A 10% discount on a smaller purchase isn’t really worth it.”

But when all these positive factors line up, myFICO says a store card can help consumers improve their credit score, just as a traditional credit card can. If the issuing bank reports the account to the major credit bureaus, the account should show up on your credit reports. 

The key, of course, is to make payments on the account on time every month.

Consumers shopping in a brick-and-mortar chain store this holiday season may be presented with an offer at checkout: Apply for the store’s charge card and...

Article Image

Affirm launches cash-back rewards program

Affirm – a buy now, pay later (BNPL) payment network – has borrowed a page from the credit card industry and is launching a cash-back rewards program for its users.

Until now, users of the Affirm app have mostly employed the system to spread purchase payments out over a period of weeks. But when users pay for their purchases in full, Affirm will now reward that.

“With the average consumer planning to spend nearly $650 on gifts this holiday season, we’re excited to offer a way for shoppers to earn while they spend,” said Greg Fisher, chief marketing officer at Affirm. “Now whether consumers want to pay in full and earn cash back or pay later by choosing a schedule that’s best for them, Affirm can offer that choice and flexibility.”

“Natural next step”

The rewards program allows users of the Affirm app to automatically earn a percentage of every eligible purchase in rewards, which can later be redeemed for cash and deposited directly into their Affirm account. To encourage early adopters, Affirm is providing an extra reward on transactions through December 15, giving users an extra $20 reward on their first eligible cash-back purchase.

“A rewards program is a natural next step for buy now, pay later companies like Affirm that are looking to attract more loyal customers,” Nerdwallet’s Annie Millerbernd wrote in an email to ConsumerAffairs. 

“While cash back is a benefit for consumers who use the same BNPL company again and again, it is still a feature that comes with many credit cards. A key feature that BNPL companies lack is credit for making on-time payments, which most credit cards do have.”

More consumers are using BNPL services

BNPL services have recently grown in popularity with consumers who are concerned about running up huge credit card balances. With BNPL transactions, there is a schedule of payments that ends with the purchase being paid for in full, often with no interest charges. Even though BNPL services are often better for consumers than carrying a high-interest credit card balance, Millerbernd says users should be aware of the risks.

“The risk with BNPL is that you could buy more than you originally planned and overextend your finances, or make too many purchases and struggle to keep track of your payments,” she said. “Though cash back is an exciting addition for consumers, it doesn’t erase the risk of overspending.”

According to a CNBC/Momentive Small Business Survey, 7% of shoppers said they will use a BNPL service as a payment method for holiday purchases during the holiday season.

Affirm – a buy now, pay later (BNPL) payment network – has borrowed a page from the credit card industry and is launching a cash-back rewards program for i...

Article Image

Credit card applications are rising, Fed survey finds

​If new credit card applications are any indication, consumers are ready to start spending again. The Federal Reserve Bank of New York reports that Americans are seeking credit at the highest rate since before the pandemic.

In the Fed’s survey, almost 27% of U.S. consumers said they had applied for a new credit card in the past 12 months. A year ago, the percentage was just 16%.

People with lower credit scores appeared to be the most active when it came to applying for new credit. At the beginning of the pandemic, this group of consumers was the most likely to have accounts closed or credit limits reduced by their lender.

With the economy recovering, lenders apparently now have a different view. Application rates for credit card and credit limit increase requests were sharply higher among those with credit scores below 680. 

The increase follows what appeared to be a robust marketing effort by banks earlier this year. The Wall Street Journal recently reported that banks increased their credit-card marketing spending in the third quarter, flooding mailboxes with new credit offers.

Read the fine print

Doug, of Acton, Mass., said he received a promotional offer from TD Bank that contained some fine print. He said the offer specified that applicants had to open a new personal checking account and could not have had a checking account in the previous 12 months.

“I did not have a personal checking account,” Doug wrote in a ConsumerAffairs review. “I did have a credit card, and apparently for them, credit card equals checking account.”

Doug said his application was denied, but he isn’t alone. Despite banks’ promotional push, Ryan, of Pearland, Texas, tells us that American Express apparently decided it was better off without his business.

“They canceled my card, without contacting me,” Ryan wrote in a ConsumerAffairs review. “Unless you owe them money, they will boot you out the door.”

The Fed’s report suggests that consumers plan to seek increases in all types of credit in the months ahead, and not necessarily because they’re planning a vacation or major purchase. The report found that consumers are feeling less financially secure, with more respondents saying they are less likely to be able to cover a $2,000 emergency expense.

​If new credit card applications are any indication, consumers are ready to start spending again. The Federal Reserve Bank of New York reports that America...

Article Image

Consumers earn an average of $757 a year with rewards credit cards, survey finds

Consumers who use a rewards credit card earn an average of $757 per year, according to a new survey commissioned by shopping platform Slickdeal.

Cards that pay rewards, whether in the form of cash or points toward future purchases or travel, have gained popularity with consumers in recent years. Cashback rewards cards reward some types of spending more than others, giving consumers a wide range of options when selecting a card.

In order to maximize benefits, people in the survey reported spending an average of six hours researching a single credit card before submitting an application. Three out of four people in the survey report using their card enough to hit the minimum spend requirement to receive reward benefits and points. 

"Credit cards aren't just another way to pay for your purchases,” said Louie Patterson, senior personal finance editor at Slickdeals. “If you choose the right rewards cards and you're strategic about how you use them, you can earn tremendous benefits such as free flights, hotel stays, or even cashback." 

Rewarding experiences

The survey found that more than half of rewards credit card users spent their rewards on a new experience, such as trying out a new restaurant, attending a concert, or traveling.

Travel appears to be a favorite category, with 55% of cardholders using rewards to pay for a large portion of a vacation. When they cashed in airline points, they were able to pay for a five-hour flight, on average.

"Once you've done the research on the right rewards card for you, there are a number of ways to maximize the benefits,” Patterson said. “Make sure you pay off the balance in full, look for opportunities to pay with your card for monthly fees such as insurance, cable, and cell phone bills, and be on the lookout for opportunities to earn bonus points, which may be awarded for specific types of purchases." 

Things to consider

When applying for a rewards credit card, consumers should not only consider what type of rewards would be the most beneficial; they should also be mindful of fees. Travel rewards cards, in particular, can carry a hefty annual fee that can wipe out some or all of any earned rewards.

Cards that pay cash back are among the most popular rewards cards and are the least likely to charge an annual fee. ConsumerAffairs has researched the best cashback cards and provides thousands of verified reviews.

Consumers who use a rewards credit card earn an average of $757 per year, according to a new survey commissioned by shopping platform Slickdeal.Cards t...

Article Image

Consumers finding more opportunities to buy now, pay later

For years credit card companies have reaped the benefits of consumers’ shift to online shopping — this is because nearly all virtual shoppers pay with a credit card. But, lately, consumers have found an alternative.

Buy now, pay later (BNPL) services are growing in popularity, and industry analysts say they're now competing with credit cards for consumer spending. There are a growing number of BNPL apps, and more merchants, including Amazon, are embracing the payment plan.

BNPL is actually an old-fashioned concept. In the days before credit cards, consumers often financed major purchases on the installment plan. Today, most BNPL services allow consumers to pay for a purchase over several weeks, making interest-free payments every two weeks until the purchase is paid for.

Some personal finance experts have praised the concept as a way for consumers to manage their money. Not only do they avoid high interest rates, but they also avoid adding to growing balances since the purchase is paid for in a short amount of time. 

Popularity among young consumers

The concept has been embraced by young consumers, which is a reason both Walmart and Amazon now offer BNPL plans.

"Buy now, pay later solutions, in general, resonate with younger customers," Julia Unger, Walmart's vice president of financial services, said in an interview with Investor's Business Daily. "They don't view BNPL as debt. They see it as a payment plan, which is a little bit different. If you have millennials that are choosing BNPL solutions instead of credit cards, we want to make sure from an acceptance standpoint that we're offering the right solutions to customers."

Walmart, partnering with BNPL fintech Affirm, offers BNPL on certain categories, including home furnishings, jewelry, and musical instruments. Most consumable products are not eligible for the financing plan.

Amazon gets on board

Late last month, Amazon also struck a deal with Affirm to provide financing on certain products. Amazon is now allowing customers to break up purchases of $50 or more into smaller payments.

Some established payment platforms, such as Square and PayPal, have recently begun offering BNPL services after acquiring companies that operate BNPL apps.

According to Investor's Business Daily, BNPL is growing exponentially. It cites data from eMarketer projecting that more than 45 million people in the U.S. will use BNPL services in 2021, up 81% from 2020.

Even though BNPL avoids the high interest rates of credit cards, consumers who don’t make their agreed-upon payments can and do fall behind. Earlier this month, Credit Karma reported that a survey it commissioned showed 44% of consumers had used BNPL — of this number, 34% reported being behind on payments.

For years credit card companies have reaped the benefits of consumers’ shift to online shopping — this is because nearly all virtual shoppers pay with a cr...

Article Image

New credit card gives rewards for ‘experiential’ travel

Credit One Bank has issued a new travel rewards card with perks that specifically reward users when they choose experience-related travel.

The new card rewards users with up to five times more points when they spend money at national parks, recreational parks, museums, and professional sporting arenas, among other venues. The company says the Wander Card is its first travel-focused credit card and gives card members flexible ways to earn and redeem points for meaningful experiences.

"The Wander Card rewards travelers for getting out to explore this country's beautiful destinations and helps cardmembers reap rewards at the planned and impromptu stops and experiences along the way," said David Herpers, senior vice president of product at Credit One Bank. 

Herpers says the Wander Card is not a typical travel rewards card. It does not involve miles, loyalty programs, executive lounges, or global escapes. Rather, it targets a different group of travelers -- one that has emerged in force in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic.

“We are filling an important gap in the market by giving road trippers, stadium tailgaters, amusement park fanatics and everyday adventurers the opportunity to earn more rewards on the things they love," Herpers said.

The card’s perks

The new card’s perks include:

  • An $80 statement credit for the purchase of a qualifying National Park Pass, valid at more than 2,000 recreation areas across the U.S., if used within the first year.

  • The chance to earn up to five times more points at recreational parks and amusement parks, including national parks, museums, and professional sporting arenas

  • The chance to earn up to three times more points at restaurants and lodging, including campgrounds and resorts.

  • The chance to earn a single point on all other purchases.

The card also offers a discount on Thousand Trails camping passes and a discount on regular-price rides on Maverick Helicopters.

Annual fee

Like many travel rewards cards, the Wander Card carries an annual fee. In this case, the charge is $95. Before applying for the card, consumers should make sure the discounts and perks will add up to cover the yearly cost.

The interest rate isn’t the lowest you’ll find in the industry either. Variable APR for purchases and cash advances is 23.99%, and the minimum interest charge is $1. 

Rewards points can be redeemed for statement credits, gift cards, and merchandise across a variety of travel, entertainment, and retail categories. All Credit One Bank card members receive free online access to their Experian credit score, Zero Fraud Liability, and automatic reviews for credit line increases. 

Consumers who are considering applying for a travel rewards credit card should check out ConsumerAffairs’ selection of the best cards in that category. Our research contains thousands of verified reviews to help you pick the right card for you.

Credit One Bank has issued a new travel rewards card with perks that specifically reward users when they choose experience-related travel.The new card...

Article Image

Venmo credit card will pay rewards in cryptocurrencies

Venmo, the payment app owned by PayPal, has added a new feature to its credit card. Starting soon, users will be able to use their cash-back rewards to purchase a variety of cryptocurrencies.

According to the company, customers can use their cash-back rewards to auto-purchase Bitcoin, Ethereum, Litecoin, and Bitcoin Cash. Once purchased, the digital currency remains in the customer’s account until they choose to spend it.

Venmo says there are no transaction fees associated with the purchases. A cryptocurrency conversion spread is built into each monthly transaction.  

"The introduction of the Cash Back to Crypto feature for the Venmo Credit Card offers customers a new way to start exploring the world of crypto, using their cash back earned each month to automatically and seamlessly purchase one of four cryptocurrencies on Venmo," said Darrell Esch, a senior vice president at Venmo. "We're excited to bring this new level of feature interconnectivity on the Venmo platform, linking our Venmo Credit Card and crypto experiences to provide another way for our customers to spend and manage their money with Venmo."

Venmo is the second fintech company to link its credit card to the world of cryptocurrencies. Last month, Upgrade launched a credit card that pays rewards in bitcoins. 

The Upgrade Bitcoin Rewards Card is an update of the company’s existing Upgrade Card, with the added feature that rewards are paid in the volatile cryptocurrency. Users earn unlimited 1.5% Bitcoin rewards on every purchase as they make payments. 

Getting started

To use a Venmo credit card to purchase digital coins, users navigate to the Venmo Credit Card home screen, select the rewards tab, and then click on “get started.” Once customers have agreed to the terms, they will be able to select their crypto of choice.

Cardholders can return to the rewards screen at any time to turn the auto-purchase feature on or off -- or even change the cryptocurrency they would like to purchase during the month.  

Using auto-purchase, a cardholder’s cash-back rewards are automatically converted into the digital currency of their choice. Since the values of these digital coins can be volatile, the amount of cryptocurrency that’s purchased through rewards may vary from month to month.

Once purchased, the cryptocurrencies remain in the customer’s account until they choose to sell them, converting them back to dollars.

Venmo, the payment app owned by PayPal, has added a new feature to its credit card. Starting soon, users will be able to use their cash-back rewards to pur...

Article Image

MyFICO offers tips for building credit scores

Consumers who took some economic hard knocks during the pandemic may be trying to repair their credit. MyFICO, the originator of FICO credit scores, is offering some advice when it comes to credit cards.

Having a credit card, keeping the balance low, and paying the bill on time, will boost your credit score in most cases but consumers should understand the difference between different types of payment cards.

Prepaid credit cards, sold in the gift card rack at retail stores, may look like a credit card and you can use it like one but it doesn’t do a thing for your credit score, according to the experts at MyFICO. Because you preload it with your own money it actually has nothing to do with credit and transactions are not reported to the credit agencies.

Here are key differences between a credit card and a prepaid card:

  • You do not need to fill out an application to open a prepaid credit card;

  • A lender will not check your credit report or perform a credit inquiry when you open a prepaid card;

  • Prepaid credit card accounts do not appear on your credit report with any of the major credit bureaus;

  • Prepaid credit cards are not considered in your FICO Scores.

Secured credit card

The reason a credit card is so important to your credit score is that it is an unsecured loan. The lender is trusting the borrower to pay it back. The lender wants to make sure the borrower is creditworthy.

For that reason, opening a credit card account may be difficult if you have a low credit score or no credit history. But MyFICO says there is an alternative -- something between a credit card requiring a high credit score and a prepaid card, which at least allows you to make online purchases.

A secured credit card is similar to a prepaid card because the user is putting up their own money in advance. But there’s an important difference.

With a prepaid card, the consumer loads the card with cash and spends it until the balance is zero. With a secured credit card, the consumer deposits the cash with the lender. If the deposit is $500, then the credit limit each month is $500.

As long as the user makes the payment on time each billing cycle, they can continue using the card, keeping the balance below the amount of their deposit. If they don’t pay off the entire balance each month, the lender will charge interest -- just as it would for a regular credit card.

Stepping stone to a regular credit card

Most lenders offering secured credit cards report payments to the credit bureaus. However, not all do, so it is worth asking when considering an application.

After using a secured credit card and making on-time payments for a year, many lenders will offer customers a chance to apply for a regular credit card and the deposit will be returned. At that point, a consumer should carefully consider the pros and cons of different cards, depending on what they purchase most.

A good place to start researching cards is the ConsumerAffairs Credit Cards Buyers Guide, which has thousands of verified reviews of a wide range of credit cards.

Consumers who took some economic hard knocks during the pandemic may be trying to repair their credit. MyFICO, the originator of FICO credit scores, is off...

Article Image

FTC cracks down on companies for helping student debt relief scammers

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has reached a settlement with two Florida companies that it accused of covering up a student debt relief scam that defrauded thousands of students and their families out of $62 million.

Regulators say Moneta Management, LLC, Moneta Management, Inc., and their CEO Michael Todd Greene knowingly provided false and deceptive information to credit card and ACH processors. By doing that, a scam being run by Brandon Frere and three other companies was allowed to continue unchecked. Luckily, that scam was shut down back in November.

“Defendants knew, should have known, or consciously avoided knowing that the information they provided payment processors was false and that the Frere Scam was defrauding consumers,” the FTC’s reports stated. 

“Even in the face of account application rejections and account terminations by processors, excessive unauthorized return and chargeback rates, and consumer reports alleging deceptive practices on the Frere companies’ Better Business Bureau (BBB) profiles, Defendants continued to work in concert with Frere and his companies to fraudulently obtain and maintain merchant accounts for the Frere Scam.”

As part of the agreement, Greene and his companies will be barred from providing payment processing services or acting as a sales agent or independent sales organization ever again. The settlement also imposes a $28.6 million judgment against the defendants, which has been reduced due to an inability to pay the full amount. 

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has reached a settlement with two Florida companies that it accused of covering up a student debt relief scam that defra...

Article Image

American Express adds benefits and bumps annual fee for Platinum Card

American Express has announced that owners of its Platinum Card will get to enjoy several new permanent travel and retail benefits in addition to its existing benefits. 

The new everyday perks will come at the cost of a higher annual fee of $695 -- up from $550. However, American Express estimates that the new suite of benefits represents a value of up to $1,400 each year. 

The company is also offering new cardholders a bigger welcome bonus that may help offset the cost of the higher annual fee. Consumers can earn 100,000 Membership Rewards Points when they spend $6,000 on purchases in the first six months of card membership.

New benefits

Effective immediately, the following new credits and discounts are available to both new and existing card members:

  • Up to $200 hotel credit. An annual $200 statement credit for prepaid bookings at Amex Fine Hotels + Resorts or The Hotel Collection properties made through American Express Travel. Fine Hotels and Resorts bookings include perks such as free breakfast, guaranteed late checkout, room upgrades, and early check-in when available. 

  • An annual $179 credit for a Clear membership. Clear is an expedited security screening program that can cut down on the time spent waiting in lines at U.S. airports and stadiums. A membership typically costs $179 per year, but Platinum Card members will receive a credit for that amount.

  • Up to $240 in digital entertainment credits. Statement credits will be issued on eligible purchases or subscriptions with Peacock, Audible, SiriusXM, or The New York Times. These credits are available in portions of up to $20 each month throughout the year.

  • Up to $300 Equinox credits. Cardholders can receive up to $300 annually (up to $25 per month) in credits toward Equinox gym memberships or digital subscriptions to on-demand fitness classes through the Equinox+ app. Enrollment to the gym is required to activate this benefit.

  • Discount on a private jet access program. Cardholders are eligible for up to 40% off a Premium Private Jet Program membership with Wheels Up, a private jet charter company. Card members will also get a $500 or $2,000 credit added to their Wheels Up account to use toward their initial flight within the first year depending on the selected Wheels Up membership.

  • Exclusive Global Dining Access by Resy. The Platinum Card offers access to exclusive reservations at some of the world’s top restaurants. American Express says Resy will also offer cardholders access to premium events and other perks, like priority notification and VIP status.

Customer reviews

ConsumerAffairs readers give the Amex Platinum Card an overall 4-star rating. Cardholders say they appreciate its ease of use and the company’s willingness to resolve issues. 

“Being an avid traveler for work and pleasure the Amex card provides me with ample opportunities to trace more, earn more miles on things I buy every day and also gives me peace of mind against fraud,” writes Andrew of Tea, S.D. “The fact that I’m able to gain Delta points on buying groceries and through end of July if I shop at local stores they are giving me 4x the points makes the card great but they are also promoting shopping small.” 

However, some cardholders have pointed out that the perks aren’t as valuable to those that only travel occasionally. 

“The rewards take a lot of miles to get. You have to travel a lot to access them,” writes Kimberley of Brownstown Twp, Mich. “The free checked bag and early boarding are a plus and the free companion pass are the perks that can be utilized easily. The yearly payment is steep for the occasional traveler.” 

American Express has announced that owners of its Platinum Card will get to enjoy several new permanent travel and retail benefits in addition to its exist...

Article Image

Two new credit cards target entertainment consumers

A number of new credit cards have hit the market since the beginning of 2021, and the two latest cards are designed for entertainment consumers. Six Flags and WWE have issued co-branded cards offering rewards and perks for their customers.

Six Flags Entertainment Corporation, the world's largest regional theme park company, is partnering with Credit One Bank on a new Visa rewards card, which is available now.

The card features exclusive offers and benefits at 24 participating Six Flags parks in the U.S. The rewards include three times rewards points on all purchases at the park, including admission, food, and merchandise.

Cardholders will also two times the points on gas, groceries, and hotel spending. All other purchases with the card will get one point for each dollar spent.

There’s also a 10% automatic cashback rewards program at participating merchants through the More Rewards Program. The card carries a $39 annual fee that is waived for consumers with excellent credit.

"If you are a thrill-seeker and want to earn rewards just by using your credit card at a Six Flags park or filling up the tank on the drive there, then our Six Flags Rewards Visa is the credit card you've been dreaming of. It provides unique benefits that have been specifically tailored for theme park enthusiasts," said John Coombe, senior vice president of marketing, Credit One Bank.

WWE Champion Credit Card

Credit One Bank is also partnering with WWE on the co-branded WWE Champion Credit Card, providing rewards and perks for wrestling fans. The card offers:

  • 3% cashback rewards on eligible internet, cable, satellite TV, and mobile phone services

  • 2% cashback rewards on eligible dining purchases

  • 1% cashback rewards on all other purchases

  • WWE merchandise discounts

  • Up to 10% cashback rewards from participating merchants through the More Rewards Program

“WWE has the most passionate fans in the world, and we are proud to give them an opportunity to not only earn cashback rewards but get exclusive opportunities on WWE merchandise and experiences with the new WWE Champion Credit Card," said Stephanie McMahon, WWE’s chief brand officer.

The WWE Champion Credit Card carries a $49 annual fee. Consumers should carefully consider how they would use a card with an annual fee and compare it with other cards that have no annual fee.

ConsumerAffairs has done the research and verified thousands of reviews to help you find the right credit card here. 

A number of new credit cards have hit the market since the beginning of 2021, and the two latest cards are designed for entertainment consumers. Six Flags...

Article Image

Businesses are increasingly adding surcharges for credit card purchases

The economy is reopening, restaurants are at full capacity in most places, and retail stores are beginning to get crowded.

But look closely at your credit card receipt after your next night out or shopping trip. Chances are, there could be a credit card surcharge tacked onto your bill.

According to MyFico, businesses that were hard hit during the pandemic are trying to regain their footing by adding a surcharge to credit card purchases to help cover the swipe fee. Networks like Visa and MasterCard make money by charging fees to businesses every time a consumer pays with a credit card.

These fees can vary but most often range from 1.5% to 3.5% of the transaction. This cuts into a business’s profit margin, especially when it’s a small purchase.

When times are good, the business may absorb the fee or add it to the purchase price. But in highly competitive businesses they don’t always think they can do that. Adding a surcharge is a way to recoup the fee without raising prices or lowering profits.

They weren’t always legal

Surcharges weren’t always legal. A series of court decisions, including a 2017 ruling by the U.S. Supreme Court, made it legal for businesses to tack on credit card surcharges in every state except Colorado, Connecticut, Kansas, Massachusetts, and Puerto Rico.

Consumers can get around the surcharge by paying cash, something that fell out of favor during the pandemic. Some small businesses may display a sign at the cash register requesting cash payments instead of plastic.

Fortunately, surcharges are not applied to debit card purchases. Paying with a debit card keeps the convenience of plastic while avoiding the surcharge.

Some consumers may overlook surcharges as insignificant. After all, a 3% fee on a $20 purchase only adds 60 cents to the bill. If you’re using a rewards credit card that pays 3% cashback, you’ve broken even. Some consumers may consider it a worthwhile payment to help their favorite restaurant get back on its feet.

Businesses don’t normally advertise the fact they tack on a surcharge. There’s usually no way to know until you’re made that first transaction, then closely examined the receipt.

The economy is reopening, restaurants are at full capacity in most places, and retail stores are beginning to get crowded.But look closely at your cred...

Article Image

Key Bank reports a big improvement in consumer’s credit use

Key Bank reports the number of consumers who have “graduated” from its secured credit card to an unsecured card has doubled over the last year. It’s yet another sign that many consumers improved their credit standing during the pandemic.

Key Bank’s secured credit card program is designed for consumers with no credit score or a very low one. The consumer deposits an amount of money -- $500 is typical -- and that money serves as the credit limit.

Cardholders use the card for small everyday purchases such as gas and groceries. The balance never goes over the amount of their security deposit. Since the balance stays low, it’s easier to get into the habit of paying the balance in full each month.

Key Bank reports its May 2021 graduating class from the Secured Credit Card Program included a record 4,513 clients, double the size of last year’s class. Nearly 3,000 people in the program had no credit score when they began. Those with low credit scores saw an increase by an average of 78 points in six months.

‘Financial wellness foundation’

"Given the economic uncertainty of the past year, we believe it's more important than ever to help our clients build a strong financial wellness foundation," said Mitch Kime, Key BAnk’s head of Consumer Lending and Payments. "The Key Secured Credit Card is just one of the many tools we make available to ensure that clients can see bright financial futures and stay on the path toward their personal financial achievements, starting with sound credit."

The “graduates” may now trade in their secured credit cards for unsecured cards. The deposit they made a year ago is returned when they do so. As long as the cardholders continue to pay their bills on time, their credit scores will continue to rise.

Key Bank’s report is in line with other data showing consumers did a better-than-expected job of managing credit during the pandemic. The predicted wave of credit card defaults never materialized. In fact, consumers’ credit card debt did not go up as the pandemic swept the country.

Serious delinquencies remain low

A recent TransUnion report found that consumers are performing well more than a year after the pandemic began, as serious delinquency rates remain lower. At the same time, new credit card accounts have risen from their COVID-19 lows.

As unemployment rose to double-digit levels last year, most lenders tightened their standards when issuing personal loans and credit cards. That caused consumers to reduce their spending. 

“Consumers and lenders alike took more prudent measures with their credit use,” Matt Komos, vice president of research and consulting at TransUnion, said last month. “Buoyed by government stimulus programs, many consumers used their benefits to remain current on accounts.”

Other reports have shown credit card holders are not only paying on time but paying down balances at a record pace. Capital One reported that half of the credit card balances on its books at the beginning of March were paid off completely by the end of the month.

Key Bank reports the number of consumers who have “graduated” from its secured credit card to an unsecured card has doubled over the last year. It’s yet an...

Article Image

Consumers have begun to open new credit card accounts

Credit card lenders have reversed their early pandemic reduction in credit to consumers. A report from TransUnion shows that there was a spike in new credit card accounts in the second half of 2020 that has continued into 2021.

Lenders began withdrawing credit card offers last year over concerns that the pandemic-driven economic shutdown would lead to a sudden rise in unemployment and defaults. In some cases, they unilaterally closed existing accounts. But the wave of defaults never materialized. In fact, consumers’ credit card debt did not go up as the pandemic swept the country.

The TransUnion report found that consumers are performing well one year since the pandemic began, as serious delinquency rates remain lower. At the same time, new credit card accounts have risen from their COVID-19 lows.

‘More prudent measures’

As unemployment rose to double-digit levels last year, most lenders tightened their standards when issuing personal loans and credit cards. That caused consumers to reduce their spending. The report shows that unsecured personal loan originations dropped from 3.9 million in the first quarter of 2020 to 2.6 million in the April to June quarter. Credit card originations declined at an even faster rate – from 15.5 million to 8.6 million in the same timeframe.

“Consumers and lenders alike took more prudent measures with their credit use,” said Matt Komos, vice president of research and consulting at TransUnion. “Buoyed by government stimulus programs, many consumers used their benefits to remain current on accounts.”

Consumers maintained their improved habits into the first quarter of 2021. Credit card balances have continued to decline, with total balances dropping to $688 billion from $814 billion in the first quarter of last year. Average consumer credit card debt per borrower dropped to $4,791, the lowest level since at least 2009 when TransUnion first began measuring this variable. 

New credit card accounts fell nearly 18% year-over-year across all credit risk tiers, with average lines on new accounts declining 28% in the same period. Earlier this month, the Wall Street Journal reported that the percentage of Discover Card balances paid off at the end of the first quarter was the largest in two decades. 

On-time payments

Even more startling, Capital One reported that half of the credit card balances on its books at the beginning of March were paid off completely by the end of the month. In addition to paying off debt, consumers also paid their bills on time, a key factor in improving credit scores.

“Delinquencies can’t get much lower than where they are now, but if your loans keep shrinking, your revenues come down [and] margins will get worse,” Discover CEO Roger Hochschild told the newspaper.

The result of all this is that lenders have resumed their aggressive marketing of credit card offers. Consumers should consider the offers carefully before acting, considering fees and perks.

To help with the decision, check out ConsumerAffairs’ credit card guide, which includes thousands of verified reviews.

Credit card lenders have reversed their early pandemic reduction in credit to consumers. A report from TransUnion shows that there was a spike in new credi...

Article Image

Consumers are paying down credit card balances despite pandemic hardships

Credit card balances haven’t gotten any larger during the pandemic; in fact, data released by various card issuers shows that they’ve actually fallen.

One reason may be the generous stimulus money handed out by Washington. It seems clear that many consumers used much of it to pay down their credit card debt. Diving into the data, the Wall Street Journal reports that the percentage of Discover Card balances paid off at the end of the first quarter was the largest in two decades. 

Even more startling, Capital One reported that half of the credit card balances on its books at the beginning of March were paid off completely by the end of the month. In addition to paying off debt, consumers also paid their bills on time, a key factor in improving credit scores.

“Delinquencies can’t get much lower than where they are now, but if your loans keep shrinking, your revenues come down [and] margins will get worse,” Discover CEO Roger Hochschild told the newspaper.

Delinquencies are down

If you note a hint of concern in Hochschild’s voice, that’s because this is a very real concern for lenders. These companies tend to reap larger profits when consumers go on a spending spree and only pay the minimum. The pandemic-related shift to reducing debt is squeezing banks and may present consumers with better credit card terms. 

In recent weeks, some card issuers have marketed more aggressively and made underwriting stands more lenient in a bid to attract new customers. Check out ConsumerAffairs’ credit card reviews of the best companies and check to see if they have updated their terms.

In a bid to increase credit card revenue, the Journal also reports that major banks plan to begin issuing credit cards to consumers who lack credit scores, sharing bill payment data in order to determine creditworthiness.

“Cash wasn’t king”

TransUnion, one of three credit reporting agencies, has also tracked improved consumer debt payment behavior during the pandemic. It notes that the improvement did not come from a lack of use but from better payment discipline.

“Cash was definitely not king during the early parts of the pandemic,” said Matt Komos, TransUnion’s head of research and consulting in the U.S. “Millions of people opted to use their credit cards to make digital transactions from the safety of their homes for groceries, clothes, and other everyday items.”

Even though consumers have made strides recently to pay down credit card debt, the total consumers owe is still quite high. A recent report by Value Penguin found that the average American’s credit card debt is more than $6,000 and that 45% of U.S. families carry some credit card debt.

Credit card balances haven’t gotten any larger during the pandemic; in fact, data released by various card issuers shows that they’ve actually fallen.O...

Article Image

Another new credit card offers rewards for animal lovers

On the heels of Petco Health and Wellness launching a new co-branded credit card that supports pet welfare, there’s another new payment card for animal lovers.

Credit One Bank is partnering with national animal welfare nonprofit Best Friends Animal Society in a co-branded credit card that the bank says offers rewards for both humans and animals. It says the money goes to help support the nonprofit's animal welfare mission and programs anytime a cardholder makes a purchase.

"We want to make it easy for our customers to support causes they care deeply about," said John Coombe, senior vice president of marketing at Credit One Bank. "That's why Credit One Bank will make donations to Best Friends Animal Society equal to 1% of all net spend made with the Best Friends Credit Card to help support their goal of reaching no-kill in shelters across the country by 2025.”

Of course, there’s also something in it for the human cardholder; they will receive 5% cash-back rewards on the first $5,000 in eligible pet shop and pet food/supply store purchases within the first calendar year. In subsequent years, the rewards drop to 1%. 

Other perks

There are also special offers from merchant partners that are specifically designed for pet lovers. Some of those include:

  • Discount codes for up to 10% off Best Friends-branded merchandise at Best Friends Lifesaving Centers, the Best Friends Mercantile, and online at the Best Friends Store;

  • Discount codes for up to 5% off lodging offered by Best Friends Animal Society, including the Best Friends Roadhouse and Mercantile, Cottages, Cabins, and RV Sites; and

  • Automatic enrollment in Credit One Bank's More Rewards program that provides up to 10% cash-back rewards from participating merchants.

There are no authorized user fees, and the Best Friends Animal Society gets 1% of every purchase.

Cause-supporting rewards cards could be a developing trend. A week ago, Petco announced two new payment cards that will not only reward the consumer but will support its animal welfare charity. With every purchase made using Petco Pay credit cards, Petco says it will make a donation to Petco Love, an independent nonprofit organization that supports pet health and welfare.

Petco has pledged to donate up to $1 million a year to the initiatives carried out by Petco Love, including a program that helps find lost pets. 

On the heels of Petco Health and Wellness launching a new co-branded credit card that supports pet welfare, there’s another new payment card for animal lov...

Article Image

Petco rolls out two new credit cards

Petco, which rebranded itself as Petco Health and Wellness Company last October, has launched a new credit card that it says will support animal welfare.

Petco Pay, provided in partnership with Alliance Data Systems Corporation, includes the Petco Pay Mastercard, a co-branded credit card, and the Petco Pay Credit Card, a private label credit card. 

The cards feature many of the standard perks and rewards most cards offer, but they also include one benefit designed to appeal to animal lovers. With every purchase made using Petco Pay credit cards, Petco says it will make a donation to Petco Love, an independent nonprofit organization that supports pet health and welfare.

Petco has pledged to donate up to $1 million a year to the initiatives carried out by Petco Love, including a program that helps find lost pets. 

"Petco's mission is to improve the lives of pets and pet parents, and we're leading the way in the credit card space with Petco Pay," said Tariq Hassan, Petco’s chief marketing officer. "This groundbreaking credit card program not only provides great benefits to cardmembers but also gives them the gratification of having a portion of every dollar they spend go toward helping animals in need."

Eight percent cash back on Petco purchases

The cards are being offered through Petco Pals Rewards, the retailer’s membership rewards program. The credit cards’ perks include 20% off the first Petco Pay purchase and 8% back at Petco. 

The company said the Petco Pay Mastercard offers additional earning opportunities like 2% back on grocery store purchases, 1% back wherever Mastercard is accepted, and a $25 Pals Reward for spending $500 outside of Petco within the first 90 days of approval. 

The Petco Pay Mastercard also features a contactless payment option. And to make the card stand out in your wallet, Petco said it will customize the cards with photos of the cardholder’s favorite pet.

Petco, which rebranded itself as Petco Health and Wellness Company last October, has launched a new credit card that it says will support animal welfare....

Article Image

Child tax credit checks will start arriving in July

Parents will start getting a little monthly financial help starting in July. Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Commissioner Charles Rettig has confirmed the tax agency will be able to begin the payments at that time.

Before the latest pandemic aid bill signed into law in March, parents received a tax credit for each child when they filed their federal tax returns. The credit was paid as part of their tax refund. 

The $1.9 trillion measure increased the amount of the credit and allowed for its monthly distribution to help families with their budgeting, especially families driven into debt by the pandemic.

But with the tax filing deadline pushed back to May 17, the IRS had warned that it was doubtful that the payments to millions of American families would begin on schedule. At a Senate hearing Tuesday, Rettig said his agency could meet the original date.

“If we end up not being on track for some unforeseen situation, we will advise you and the committee,” Rettig told Sen. Sherrod Brown (D-Ohio).

Eligibility requirements

The monthly payment parents receive will depend on how many children they have and their household income. Individuals earning less than $75,000, or married couples earning $150,000 or less, will get the full benefit, which has been raised from $2,000 to between $3,000 and $3,600. 

The new law increased the tax credit to $3,000 per child aged 6 to 17 and $3,600 per child under the age of six for the 2021 tax year.

Parents making more than the income thresholds will still receive the original credit -- $2,000 per child under age 17 for families making less than $200,000 annually, or $400,000 for married couples.

Monthly payments from July to December

The new, increased tax credit will come in the form of a monthly check from the IRS from July through December. The amount each family gets will range from $250 for older children and $300 for children under the age of six. The other half of the tax credit will come in the form of a tax refund in 2022.

To receive the tax credit, parents must have filed a 2020 tax return. Rettig said the tax agency won’t have the information required to distribute the payments if it doesn’t have a return on file.

Aside from filing a federal return, there are no requirements. There is also no limit on the number of children in a family getting the payments if they meet the eligibility requirements.

Parents will start getting a little monthly financial help starting in July. Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Commissioner Charles Rettig has confirmed the t...

Article Image

DoorDash and Instacart may launch their own credit cards

Many successful businesses take the step of co-branding their own credit cards by partnering with a credit card lender. Two delivery firms that thrived during the pandemic -- DoorDash and Instacart -- are apparently ready to take that step.

The Wall Street Journal reports that Instacart, which delivers groceries, is linking up with JPMorgan Chase to issue a co-branded credit card packed with rewards and incentives. DoorDash, one of the leaders in restaurant order delivery, is also said to be poised to launch its own credit card and is in negotiations with major banks and fintech companies.

With the pandemic potentially drawing to a close, both companies are hoping consumers continue the ordering habits they formed during the last year. According to The Journal, the companies believe that having a rewards credit card will keep their newly won customers engaged once restrictions are lifted.

Banks always like it when successful merchants brand a credit card, seeing it as a way to make inroads with consumers who like and support a particular brand. The more credit cards get used for purchases, the more profitable it is for banks.

No comment

Neither company has commented on the report, but The Journal says it has spoken to people with knowledge of the deals who have provided some of the details. For example, the Instacart card is expected to offer 5 percent cash back on Instacart purchases.

DoorDash is reportedly reviewing bids and plans to make a selection in the coming weeks. JPMorgan Chase is also said to be pursuing a deal with DoorDash.

Is there room for more co-branded credit cards? The average consumer has about four credit cards in their wallet, so the field could expand. JPMorgan is already a partner in Amazon’s co-branded credit card, but major banks tend to link up with hotel and airline cards since those purchases tend to be larger. 

Some of the most widely used co-branded credit cards include the Southwest Rapid Rewards  Priority Credit Card, the Hilton Honors Aspire Card from American Express, and the Costco Anywhere Visa Card issued by Citi.

Is a co-branded credit card right for you? Check out ConsumerAffairs’ verified reviews of the top credit cards here. 

Many successful businesses take the step of co-branding their own credit cards by partnering with a credit card lender. Two delivery firms that thrived dur...

Article Image

Financial habits learned during the pandemic may last, survey suggests

With the end of the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic in sight, a new survey suggests that about a third of consumers will resume running up big credit card bills. However, even more consumers won’t.

For 42 percent of the consumers in the Debt.com survey, the curbs they put on credit card purchases during the pandemic may be lasting. At least, that’s their stated intention.

The survey seems to suggest that many consumers learned valuable money lessons during 2020. In 2019, when Debt.com asked consumers how often they hit their credit card credit limit, 49 percent replied “never” or “rarely.” In the latest survey, conducted at the height of the pandemic, 57 percent gave that answer.

In fact, credit card usage is down despite the fact that so much retail activity has moved online. There was a 10 percent decrease in the number of people who said they used credit cards for shopping. 

Credit card balances declined

The number of people carrying more than $20,000 in credit card debt increased, but only by 1 percent in the first quarter of this year. Overall, the money consumers owed on credit card balances fell last year, according to Experian.

It was the first time in seven years that any major consumer debt category went down. Experian called it “a surprising turn of events” given the broader economic environment brought on by the pandemic.

Before last year, consumer credit card debt had grown for eight straight years, hitting a record high of $829 billion in 2019. In 2020, balances plunged by 9 percent, bringing total U.S. outstanding credit card debt to $756 billion, the lowest point since 2017.

Warning sign

The Experian data dovetails with the Debt.com survey, showing that consumers have reduced their credit utilization and improved when it comes to on-time payments. The Debt.com survey shows the number of people opening new credit card accounts dropped by 1.5 percent last year.

"Opening new credit cards can drag down your credit score and it's a warning sign," said Debt.com President Don Silvestri. "In my experience, it's likely that a person has maxed out their other cards and is seeking more breathing room. Unfortunately, they rarely catch up. Instead, they get trapped with more debt."

Rod Griffin, senior director of consumer education and advocacy for Experian, says consumers tend to make better financial decisions when they understand the factors that influence credit standing.

He says that by reducing credit utilization and delinquencies, consumers have done the two most important things they can to improve their credit scores, which “should position them better to emerge strong from the pandemic."

With the end of the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic in sight, a new survey suggests that about a third of consumers will resume running up big credit card...

Article Image

Credit reporting agencies extend free weekly credit reports through April 2022

With pandemic-related financial stresses still burdening many consumers, three national credit reporting agencies -- Equifax, Experian, and Transunion -- have announced that they are extending free weekly credit report monitoring until April 2022. 

The companies said they will continue to offer free weekly credit reports until after next year’s Tax Day so that Americans can continue keeping tabs on their financial data during the COVID-19 pandemic. 

“Access to financial information and records on a more frequent basis helps people plan for their future while also taking care of the present," said Equifax CEO Mark W. Begor, Experian CEO Brian Cassin and Transunion CEO Chris Cartwright in a joint statement this month. "We strive to make credit more accessible and available to people every day and we hope continuing to make free credit reports available each week is helpful to consumers."

Check your credit report regularly

Credit reports have information about your credit history and payment history that lenders look at before approving loans and determining what interest rate to offer. Before the COVID-19 pandemic, U.S. consumers were entitled to one free credit report from each agency per year.

By checking your credit report regularly, you can ensure that the report is correct. If the report contains an error in any section, you can notify the credit reporting agency to initiate a dispute of that information.

“For consumers, ensuring that one’s credit remains in good standing during this time goes beyond paying mortgages, auto loans, credit card bills and other financial obligations each month," said Francis Creighton, President and CEO of the Consumer Data Industry Association.

Consumers can obtain free credit reports by visiting AnnualCreditReport.com.

With pandemic-related financial stresses still burdening many consumers, three national credit reporting agencies -- Equifax, Experian, and Transunion -- h...

Article Image

LendingTree report shows lenders were more lenient last year

More consumers are calling their credit card companies and asking for better terms, and a new report from LendingTree suggests that credit card companies are cooperating.

The report suggests that the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic has been a major factor. The financial hardships caused by the virus have prompted more requests from cardholders, and the report says it’s also a factor in making lenders more lenient.

The report found that 83 percent of cardholders who asked to have their credit card's interest rate reduced had their request granted. The success rate when asking a lender to waive a late fee was even higher -- 88 percent.

Eighty-three percent of cardholders who asked for a higher credit limit received one, which is remarkable since credit card companies unilaterally reduced credit limits for some customers early in the pandemic. 

It never hurts to ask

Ninety-two percent of those who asked their credit card company to drop an annual fee had their request granted. Matt Schulz, LendingTree’s chief credit analyst, says the lesson is that it never hurts to ask.

"The truth is that people have way more power over their credit card issuer than they realize, and they only need to wield it to save themselves some real money," Schulz said. 

But the report makes clear that too few credit card customers are making these kinds of requests. Fewer than half of those with an annual fee card asked for that fee to be waived or reduced in the last year, but almost everyone who asked got a “yes” answer.

Women were more likely than men to speak up and ask for these breaks than in past years and, in most cases, were more likely to have them granted than in previous years. People who experienced a loss of income during the pandemic asked their lenders for help more than those whose income remained the same. 

Lenders want to be seen as accommodative

LendingTree found that, for the most part, these requests were met with approvals on the part of the credit card companies, which no doubt wanted to be viewed as helpful during a trying time for the country. But Schulz says consumers shouldn’t wait for an emergency to ask their credit card company for a break.

"It's incredibly important to know that you have options during a global, economy-wrecking pandemic, of course, but it is also a good idea even in the best of times,” he said. “The more fees you can avoid and the more interest rates you can lower, the better — and as this survey shows, often all it takes is a simple phone call to make it happen."

More consumers are calling their credit card companies and asking for better terms and a new report from LendingTree says increasingly, credit card compani...

Article Image

CFPB steps in to help shield consumers from having their stimulus check garnished by creditors

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) is trying to moderate a recently discovered loophole that allows debt collectors to take Economic Impact Payment (EIP) funds from consumers’ bank accounts. On Wednesday, the agency said it was encouraging both creditors and financial institutions to allow the stimulus checks distributed through the American Rescue Plan to reach consumers before taking any over-the-top actions.

“The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau is squarely focused on addressing the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on economically vulnerable consumers and is looking carefully at the stimulus payments that millions are now receiving through the American Rescue Plan,” said CFPB Acting Director Dave Uejio. 

“The Bureau is concerned that some of those desperately needed funds will not reach consumers, and will instead be intercepted by financial institutions or debt collectors to cover overdraft fees, past-due debts, or other liabilities.”

Financial institutions say they want to help consumers

Uejio said that his agency has had discussions with financial industry trade associations that want to work with consumers who are struggling during the pandemic. 

Many of those organizations went as far as saying that they have already begun -- or will soon begin -- taking proactive measures to make sure that consumers can access the full value of their stimulus payments. 

“If payments are seized, many financial institutions have pledged to promptly restore the funds to the people who should receive them, Uejio said.

Advice for consumers

The CFPB says consumers should monitor their bank accounts or use the IRS’ Get My Payment tool to confirm that EIP funds have been deposited into their accounts. The agency has also launched a new consumer advisory that offers advice on the steps consumers can take if they believe their bank or credit union has withheld their stimulus payment to cover an overdrawn account balance. 

In overdrawn account balance situations, the CFPB says banks and credit unions may employ a variety of methods to ensure that their customers have access to the full value of their EIP funds.

Frequently, financial institutions have issued temporary provisional credits in the amount of the overdrawn account balance. However, it’s important to note that provisional relief credit may only be temporary, and the credit might be taken back after a specified period of time. It’s rare, but the CFPB says that some banks and credit unions have gone as far as permanently forgiving overdrawn account balances or issuing paper checks for the full EIP amount to consumers with overdrawn accounts. 

“If you think your bank or credit union will take or has taken a portion of your EIP to cover money you owe to the bank or credit union -- call them. If you legitimately do not owe the money, you should make them aware,” advises the CFPB’s Valentin Mihalache.

“Each financial institution has its own policies, but many are willing to work with customers who have been financially impacted by COVID-19. If they offer you a temporary credit, ask them to explain how it works and when you’ll have to pay it back. You can use our guiding questions to talk to your bank or credit union about this issue.”

Mihalache says consumers should also be aware of potential scams and avoid giving personal or banking information to unsolicited callers who claim to help with relief payments. Consumers can submit complaints to the CFPB online or by calling (855) 411-2372.

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) is trying to moderate a recently discovered loophole that allows debt collectors to take Economic Impact Pa...

Article Image

Loophole allows debt collectors to take stimulus money from consumers’ bank accounts

If you’re waiting for the mailman to deliver your $1,400 stimulus check, it’s on its way. However, if you’re in debt, that $1,400 might be gone before you ever see it.

The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) is not allowed to offset the amount of the stimulus check to pay various past-due federal debts or back taxes, but that’s where the agency’s authority ends. Other forms of debt -- such as state taxes, credit card bills, and medical bills -- remain unprotected. 

To make matters worse, those stimulus funds can be taken out with no questions asked. All a debt collector has to prove is that they have obtained a judgment against the debtor to collect on those accounts.

Lawmakers try to remedy the situation

While the stimulus plan offers many benefits -- from a Child Tax Credit of up to $3,600 per child, $20 billion for rental assistance, and $4.5 billion for energy bills through the Low Income Home Energy Assistance Program -- the loophole that gives creditors access to in-debt consumers’ bank accounts is ominous.

Some of the stimulus checks have already landed in people’s bank accounts, and some of the larger banks are expecting a landslide of deposits this Wednesday. That means the opportunity to remedy the situation with debt collectors is closing quickly. However, lawmakers are stepping in to try to fix the issue as quickly as they can.

Sen. Ron Wyden (OR-D) said he plans to introduce legislation that would safeguard the stimulus money from being garnished so that debt collectors can’t prevent those in need from getting access to emergency funds.

Different check, but same loophole

Wyden is not alone, and this isn’t the first time that this loophole has been left open.

“The stimulus is an essential shot in the arm to help families pay for food, rent, medicine, and auto loans, and stay connected to essential utility services,” said National Consumer Law Center Associate Director Lauren Saunders. 

But Saunders noted that the new bill, unlike the December stimulus bill, fails to prohibit debt collectors from garnishing bank accounts to grab stimulus payments. “Now Congress must take immediate action to ensure that the economic stimulus payments feed families as intended rather than debt collectors,” he said.

If you’re waiting for the mailman to deliver your $1,400 stimulus check, it’s on its way. However, if you’re in debt, that $1,400 might be gone before you...

Article Image

Americans paid nearly $83 billion in credit card debt last year, report shows

Despite a pandemic that threw the economy into reverse a year ago, Americans managed to pay off a record $82.9 billion in credit card debt, according to the personal finance site WalletHub.

In a typical year, Americans add $54.2 billion to their credit card balances. But 2020 was anything but a typical year. Amid economic uncertainty early in the pandemic, consumers mostly kept their credit cards in their wallets. WalletHub analyst Jill Gonzalez says it’s just the second time in the past 35 years that U.S. consumers have ended the year owing less credit card debt than they started with.

“Paying off so much credit card debt indicates that consumers have been making the most of the pandemic, by using the stimulus money and COVID restrictions to make their finances more sustainable,” she said.

Average balance: $8,089

Oddly, consumers said the pandemic made it more difficult to run up debt. They didn’t go to restaurants as much, they didn’t take trips, and they didn’t shop as much. As a result., the average credit card balance dipped to $8,089 last year. It rose a little more than 3 percent in the fourth quarter of 2020, but that was the slowest increase in a decade.

With the vaccine rollout well underway Gonzelez expects that spending will increase by as much as $50 billion this year, and much of that spending will end up on credit cards.

“A short-term burst of spending is inevitable as pandemic restrictions are lifted,” Gonzalez said. “The question is which way the pendulum swings in 2022 and beyond. My hope is that consumers will internalize lessons learned during the pandemic and showcase a newfound frugality.”

Americans still owe more than $1 trillion on credit card balances, but they appeared to manage better in 2020 than in past years. The credit card “charge-off” rate -- the rate at which credit card companies give up on collecting what they are owed -- was 2.53 percent in the fourth quarter of last year, a drop of 24.3 percent.

Make a budget

Credit card debt is among the most expensive debt consumers take on, with an average interest rate of around 17 percent. Personal finance experts say consumers can avoid increasing their credit card balance by making a budget and sticking to it.

Using a balance transfer card with a least 12 months of 0 percent interest is also a good way to make progress in paying off debt since the entire monthly payment pays down the principal.

ConsumerAffairs has researched the best balance transfer credit cards here.

Despite a pandemic that threw the economy into reverse a year ago, Americans managed to pay off a record $82.9 billion in credit card debt, according to th...

Article Image

Military families are struggling financially through the pandemic, survey shows

U.S. military personnel say their training helped them cope with the financial uncertainties of the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic, but a survey shows that many had difficulty getting access to credit when they needed it.

According to the National Foundation for Credit Counseling (NFCC) 2020 Military Financial Readiness survey, military households were generally prepared to deal with the crisis that began nearly a year ago. But as the situation continued, the survey showed active duty and veteran households had difficulty maintaining their income. Gig economy jobs were harder to find, and credit opportunities dried up.

As a result, this community encountered a trend toward increased reliance on borrowing. Active duty households struggled more than veterans. Rebecca Steele, President and CEO of the NFCC, said the survey uncovered some distinct challenges faced by members of the military community.

“By clearly outlining the unique financial challenges of military families and veterans, our survey presents a roadmap that helps us take action based on areas of greatest need,” she said.

Reliance on payday lenders

Among the troubling findings, the survey suggests that the COVID-19 pandemic may be a contributing factor to increased payday loan usage. Fifty-percent of households in the survey reported difficulty finding adequate loan options during the pandemic.

That burden fell heaviest on active duty service members; they were twice as likely to have taken out a cash advance or payday loan in 2020 than in 2019.

While citing their military training as preparing them to adapt to the crisis conditions brought on by the pandemic, the survey shows that many military families lacked the financial resources to meet the challenge. One in five military spouses reported being financially unprepared when the economy shut down.

Disruptions in spouses’ employment

Part of that may have been due to disruptions to employment. Complications with Permanent Change of Station (PCS) moves during the pandemic may have contributed to military spouses’ employment challenges and resulted in a loss of income at a critical time, forcing many families to seek credit anywhere they could find it.

“The pandemic has amplified the need for more affordable sources of credit for service members who may be facing gaps in income,” said Darlene Goins, head of Financial Health Philanthropy at Wells Fargo. 

Goins said the bank supports NFCC’s program of free access to financial coaching to help military households plan, create a budget, and prepare for future emergencies. 

“Ultimately, the goal is to create a safe space to work through financial challenges,” she said.

The survey found veterans faced their own financial struggles during the pandemic. Forty-nine percent said they would have liked to have more information about financial resources that were specifically tailored to veterans.

U.S. military personnel say their training helped them cope with the financial uncertainties of the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic, but a survey shows tha...

Article Image

The $1.9 trillion stimulus measure would increase the child tax credit

Congressional Democrats are hammering out the details of a key element of their proposed $1.9 trillion stimulus bill. The measure would significantly increase the Child Tax Credit and change the way it is distributed.

Language in the stimulus measure instructs Congress to create a $25 billion emergency fund and spend $15 billion on an existing grant program to help child care providers.

Specifically, it would expand the child care tax credit for one year so that families would get back as much as half of their spending on child care for children under age 13. Rep. Richard Neal (D-Mass.), chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee, says the measure under consideration would give families at least $3,000 per child.

"The pandemic is driving families deeper and deeper into poverty, and it's devastating,” Neal told CNN. “We are making the Child Tax Credit more generous, more accessible, and by paying it out monthly, this money is going to be the difference in a roof over someone's head or food on their table." 

What families would get

According to CNN, which obtained a copy of the proposed bill, the measure would pay families $3,600 per child under the age of six and $3,000 per child aged 6 through 17. The current Child Tax Credit pays $2,000 per child.

The benefit would last for a year and be limited to single parents earning up to $75,000 a year and for couples earning up to $150,000. 

The payments could be made on a monthly basis so that families could make it part of their household budgets. Typically, tax credits are distributed as part of income tax refunds. If passed by Congress, Neal said payments would begin in July.

Congress has yet to pass the $1.9 trillion aid package, but Democrats say they have the votes to do so. In the Senate, where no Republicans have signaled support, Democrats plan to use budget reconciliation to pass the measure with a simple majority.

Congressional Democrats are hammering out the details of a key element of their proposed $1.9 trillion stimulus bill. The measure would significantly incre...

Article Image

Credit card companies sweeten their offers to new customers

At the start of the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic, many credit card companies lowered some customers’ credit limits. They even unilaterally closed some customers’ accounts to limit their risk as millions of cardholders suddenly became unemployed.

But at the start of 2021, with two vaccines rolling out and a third on the way, credit card companies want your business again. Some are offering incentives to encourage you to apply. Some of these perks are more attractive than others.

Our friends at CardRatings.com have sifted through the offers and highlighted the ones that should catch consumers’ attention. Here’s a sampling:

  • Chase Freedom Unlimited. Once you sign up you can earn $200 after spending $500 in the first three months of card membership. It’s normal perk is 1.5 percent cashback on all purchases. That’s still in place, but it has added 5 percent on travel spending and 3 percent cashback on purchases at restaurants and drugstores.

  • Blue Cash Everyday. Earn up to $300 by hitting a few goals after signing up. Earn $100 by spending $1,000 within six months of opening an account. You earn 20 percent back on Amazon purchases made during the same timeframe, up to $200 back. Instead of having to earn the bonus in three months new cardholders now have six months.

  • Gold Card from American Express. Open a new account and earn 60,000 rewards points by spending $4,000 within the first six months. That’s a nearly 100 percent increase over what it was a year ago. It also provides a longer time to earn it.

Business credit cards

Small business credit cards have also gotten more generous in 2021. With many businesses struggling, not only is expanded access to credit helpful, the rewards can also come in handy.

  • Ink Business Cash. After opening an account cardholders can earn $750 after spending $7,500 in the first three months of card membership. While the requirement is an increase over last year the reward is greater, and an average spend of $2,500 a month for a business over three months may not be a stretch.

  • Amex Business Platinum. New cardholders have the chance to earn 85,000 rewards points after spending $15,000 on qualifying purchases during the first three months of card membership. It doesn’t stop there -- you get 5X points in five select business categories during the same timeframe.

"These types of bonus offers could help cardholders offset some of their expenses, or assist small businesses struggling to make ends meet," says Jennifer Doss, an editor for CardRatings. "Terms and welcome offers often change, so it's important to read the fine print and pay close attention to a card's details when opening a new account."

You can check out these and other major credit cards and read thousands of verified reviews in the ConsumerAffairs credit cards buyers guide.

At the start of the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic, many credit card companies lowered some customers’ credit limits. They even unilaterally closed some c...

Article Image

Walgreens to roll out its own credit cards and a prepaid debit card in 2021

It’s commonplace for retailers to have their own vanity cards, but Walgreens’ latest foray goes a little further. In an effort to boost both loyalty and revenue, the drugstore chain says it will partner with Synchrony and Mastercard to launch credit cards and a prepaid debit card, and it is exploring other financial services.

The company’s short-term plan for the credit cards is to connect them with its new customer loyalty program, myWalgreens, allowing cardholders to receive cash rewards and other offers. 

A wide range of benefits

Walgreens is keeping its cards close to its chest, only going as far as saying that the co-branded credit card will offer an undefined “wider range of benefits” when used at other retailers and service providers. The offering will reportedly be the first in another “range of new financial products and services” that the company has up its sleeve. While it didn’t give specifics, it said in a release that it plans to explore a number of add-ons that Mastercard offers such as point-of-sale financing and installments.

That last part -- point-of-sale financing and installment plans -- comes directly from the financial crunch that the pandemic put the consumer world in. According to a report by Salesforce and coverage by CNBC, the use of “buy now, pay later” for online orders grew 109 percent during the 2020 holiday shopping season.

The company is also taking a health-first cue from the pandemic, allowing customers to have access to contactless shopping experiences.

“Walgreens is committed to providing our customers and patients with unparalleled loyalty and rewards experiences for managing their health and well-being, and we are excited to partner with Synchrony and Mastercard, who share our commitment to support healthy communities,” said John Standley, Walgreens president. 

“As we continue to focus on creating new revenue streams, we look forward to exploring and introducing even more health and well-being payment initiatives in the near future.”

The new Walgreens credit cards are slated to be available in the second half of 2021, and eligible customers will be able to use the Walgreens credit card for purchases at more than 9,000 Walgreens stores, via the Walgreens mobile app, and at Walgreens.com.

It’s commonplace for retailers to have their own vanity cards, but Walgreens’ latest foray goes a little further. In an effort to boost both loyalty and re...

Article Image

Biden plans big changes to how credit scores are formulated

The incoming Biden administration is supporting a proposal for a government-run credit reporting agency that it says would make lending fairer and go a long way toward eliminating racial and wealth disparities in the financial industry.

Under the proposal, developed by the think tank Dēmos, the credit agency would be part of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) and would replace the for-profit credit agencies over a seven-year period.

“A public credit registry would develop algorithms that diminish the impact of past discrimination, deliver transparent credit scoring, provide greater data security, and offer a publicly accountable way to resolve disputes,” writes Amy Traub, associate director, Policy & Research at Dēmos, who developed the proposal. “The use of credit information for non-lending purposes, such as employment, housing, and insurance will be curtailed.”

The plan to create a government credit reporting agency is contained in Biden’s housing program, which is aimed at ending discriminatory housing practices.

Tools to raise your credit score

In the meantime, consumers seeking to boost their credit score in the new year have a number of tools to help them. XTM, a Canadian Fintech company, has rolled out what it calls “micro-credit” to its Today credit cardholders.

The company says its new product delivers overdraft protection on a subscription model and reports a good repayment history to the credit bureaus, increasing subscribers' credit score. 

There are other simple steps consumers can take to add points to their credit score. Among the most important is paying all bills on time every month; late payments are one of the largest factors weighing down credit scores.

Pay your credit card bill early

Consumers who pay off their credit card balances in full each month can get the maximum benefit from that by simply moving up their payment date. According to Credit Karma, credit card companies report balances to the credit agencies on the day the account closes for the month.

The cardholder has 30 days in which to make the payment, but as far as the credit agencies are concerned, the consumer is carrying a credit card balance. The credit agencies are never informed that the balance has been paid off before the due date.

By checking your balance three or four days before the closing date and paying the complete balance immediately, the credit agencies see a $0 balance when the account closes for the month. Credit Karma says that’s worth several points on your credit score.

Here’s why: According to Experian credit balances, credit utilization, or the percentage of your available credit that you're using, makes up 30 percent of your FICO score. Paying the balance before the month is over keeps your balance well under 30 percent of your available credit.

The incoming Biden administration is supporting a proposal for a government-run credit reporting agency that it says would make lending fairer and go a lon...

Article Image

Your travel rewards card may now reward more than just travel

Consumers who have a travel rewards card may find that it hasn’t been all that useful during the pandemic since travel has been limited. But a number of card issuers have found other ways to offer their customers perks, even when they don’t leave home.

MyFICO recently reported on how some card issuers are rewarding their home-bound cardholders. They’re expanding their higher-earning rewards categories to appeal to the shift away from travel spending. 

For example, the Chase Sapphire Preferred Card is now offering more points for grocery purchases. Cardholders can earn two points per dollar on up to $1,000 in grocery store purchases from November 1, 2020 to April 30, 2021. 

At the same time, cardholders can also accumulate two points per dollar spent on dining, which includes eligible delivery services and takeout.

The Chase Sapphire Reserve Card is also offering more rewards on groceries and gasoline purchases. From June 30, 2020 through June 30, 2021, cardholders are getting an automatic statement credit on gas and grocery store purchases of up to $300.

Grocery store purchases made between November 1, 2020 to April 30, 2021 will earn three points per dollar.

Restaurants, supermarkets, and gas stations

Citi Premier, another popular travel card, has beefed up its points offered on restaurants, supermarkets, and gas purchases. Cardholders get three points per dollar when they use the card at restaurants, supermarkets, and gas stations -- and it still rewards travel. Travelers get three points per dollar on travel expenses.

Ordering out has become a household routine during the pandemic, and Capital One travel cards reward customers when they use UberEats. From now through January 31, 2021, the Capital One Venture and VentureOne are offering five points per dollar on UberEats food delivery purchases.

If you’ve already racked up a lot of miles and points on your travel card, remember that they don’t always have to be redeemed for travel. If you check into your card’s rewards options, you may find that you can cash in your miles for statement credits, gift cards, and even merchandise.

If you carry a travel rewards card in your wallet, it’s important to make it rewarding in some way. Many of these cards carry a hefty annual fee. If you aren’t getting rewards to at least cover the fee, there are many more efficient options.

While closing an account can negatively affect your credit score, you may be able to stay with your same provider but switch from a card with an annual fee to one without one.

Consumers who have a travel rewards card may find that it hasn’t been all that useful during the pandemic since travel has been limited. But a number of ca...

Article Image

Holiday shoppers push credit limits, raising personal debt to a six-year high

While holiday spending showed a modest increase this year, the people doing the spending were racking up a serious amount of debt. 

According to a December 2020 MagnifyMoney survey, fewer Americans piled up holiday debt than in pandemic-free 2019, but those who used a credit card or took out a loan did it to the tune of $1,381 on average. That’s an increase of nearly $400, or 40 percent, since MagnifyMoney first started conducting its survey in 2015.

Pushing credit as far as possible

The consumer market was seemingly undeterred by COVID-19 or mounting unemployment rates. While it wasn’t exactly spend-at-all-costs, shoppers inched closer in that direction. Here are some of MagnifyMoney’s findings that show just how far consumers went into debt over the 2020 holiday:

The credit card bill can wait. As might be expected, credit cards were the most popular way to pay for holiday purchases among those who took the debt route. Fifty-six percent of the borrowers surveyed said they flexed the plastic this holiday season, but almost all of those who took on holiday debt (89 percent) said they’re not likely to pay the total completely off on their first month’s bill, putting them into the precarious position of taking on hefty interest charges.

“Still, most consumers will likely not take advantage of debt payoff strategies like debt consolidation or balance transfers,” commented Erika Giovanetti, the debt and personal loans writer for LendingTree. “Less than two in five (38 percent) consumers with holiday debt will try to consolidate their debt or shop around for a good balance transfer rate. For those who will not, the most common reason was not wanting to deal with another bank (20 percent).”

Personal loans continue their rise. The number of Americans with personal loans has increased steadily in recent years from 15 million to 20+ million, according to TransUnion, but the number of people turning to personal loans to finance holiday purchases is also on the rise. More than one in four of those who took on holiday debt this year (27 percent) said that debt came from a personal loan, up from one in five (20 percent) a year ago. 

Younger consumers dancing on the edge

The researchers conducting the survey said their findings also point to a troubling trend of buying now and paying later among younger consumers. 

“Point-of-sale financing companies like Affirm and Quadpay are popular among consumers. Nearly four in 10 (37 percent) of all Americans surveyed used ‘buy now, pay later’ financing for at least one holiday purchase this year,” Giovanetti said, pegging millennials and parents of young children as the demographics most likely to utilize this type of financing.

Gionvaetti’s cohort, Matt Schulz, chief credit analyst at LendingTree, says that point-of-sale found its groove in 2020 and is likely here to stay. “People like it because the payments are typically predictable and easier to understand than credit card payments, and there’s no risk of running up more debt after the loan is paid off,” he said.

While it’s probably not something they’d teach in Economics 101, the survey laid bare that half of those laid off or furloughed due to the pandemic in the millennials/young parents group also took on holiday debt -- most likely to try and bring something positive to 2020.

“The pandemic has wrecked so many things for so many people, canceling birthday parties, vacations, family get-togethers and more,” said Schulz. “Now, many people are likely trying to overdo it a bit for Christmas to make up for a crummy year. It’s easy to understand, but that spending can really clobber your budget.”

While holiday spending showed a modest increase this year, the people doing the spending were racking up a serious amount of debt. According to a Decem...

Article Image

Here are three credit card trends to watch for in 2021

When the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic struck in March, credit card companies reacted almost immediately, unilaterally closing some accounts and approving fewer new ones.

Now that vaccines against the virus are rolling out and an end to the pandemic is in sight, what credit card trends are in store for 2021? CardRatings.com has issued a new report listing some of the changes consumers can expect in the coming year.

Among the trends, the company’s analysts believe it will continue to be a bit harder to open a new credit card account. When accounts are approved, they may also have smaller credit limits. That’s because credit cards are unsecured debt, meaning the lender has no collateral in the event that the consumer can’t pay. With unemployment still high and the economy still uncertain, lenders can be expected to show some caution.

"Thankfully, with the recent vaccine rollout, there's reason to be hopeful the economy – and credit card approvals – bounce back sooner rather than later," said Brooklyn Lowery, senior managing editor for CardRatings

Shifting rewards

In the meantime, there could be less available credit in the consumer economy. Small businesses may find they’re making fewer sales. On the other hand, the just-signed stimulus bill may help by putting money in consumers’ pockets.

Travel rewards cards are getting much less use during the pandemic, so lenders are finding alternative ways to reward cardholders for using them. One example is the Chase Pay Yourself Back program that allows consumers with the Chase Ultimate Rewards card to redeem points for several categories of everyday purchases. 

That perk was announced as a "limited time" feature earlier this year, but it has already been expanded to additional cards and extended into 2021. CardRatings analysts say the program could even become a permanent feature as banks try to retain cardholders while attracting new ones.

Rising rates

A third trend to watch for in the coming year is rising credit card interest rates. Rates have been stable and even declined some during the pandemic because the Federal Reserve has essentially cut a key interest rate to 0 percent.

CardRatings analysts don’t expect that trend to continue. Bond yields are already beginning to show some signs of life, and credit card rates could soon rise as well, especially as the pandemic begins to end.

"Historically, interest rates tend to go up as the economy improves," Lowery said.

That’s why consumers should start now paying down credit card balances. In the future, more of the monthly payment may go toward just paying interest.

When the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic struck in March, credit card companies reacted almost immediately, unilaterally closing some accounts and approvin...

Article Image

Capital One reportedly barring customers from ‘buy now, pay later’ options

Capital One reportedly will no longer allow its customers to use its credit cards to pay off debt accrued through “buy now, pay later” (BNPL) transactions, which have grown in popularity during the pandemic.

A growing number of apps offer BNPL services in which a consumer purchases an item and charges it through the app. The consumer makes four payments, usually every two weeks, to clear the debt.

Consumers don’t pay interest. The app company charges the merchant a small commission. But the transactions are considered risky because the consumer is not required to submit to a credit check.

Reuters reports that Capital One has confirmed that it will not allow its customers using its credit cards to clear BNPL debt because of “unacceptable risk.” It’s the first credit card company to take that step.

‘Risky business’

Reuters quotes a Capital One spokeswoman as saying the company is ending the practice of consumers putting “point-of-sale” loans on its credit cards. 

“These kinds of transactions can be risky for customers and the banks that serve them,” the spokeswoman told the news agency.

Credit card companies also view BNPL as a growing source of competition. Consumers who switch from paying with a credit card don’t pay interest, which averages about 17 percent on balances. 

How it works

One BNPL app company, Klarna, explains how it works in the terms and conditions on its website:

  • Use your own valid debit or credit card, or other accepted payment method, to pay (no prepaid cards).

  • The initial payment is charged when the merchant completes your order (this is usually the shipping date for online orders).

  • The next 3 payments are automatically charged every 2 weeks after your first payment.

  • There are no interest charges with Pay later in 4 installments, and no fees when you follow your automatic payment schedule.

BNPL services are largely unregulated, even though they involve what are in effect interest-free loans. A search for “buy now pay later” on the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) websites returned no results.

Some personal finance experts have warned that BNPL could pose trouble for impulsive consumers. They say consumers could look past the high cost of an item if they only see the payment they will be required to make every two weeks.

Capital One reportedly will no longer allow its customers to use its credit cards to pay off debt accrued through “buy now, pay later” (BNPL) transactions,...

Article Image

Survey finds consumers’ data breach concerns are growing

With so many consumer purchases shifting to online channels this year, it should come as no surprise that credit card usage is much higher than in past years. For that reason, using the right card for your particular needs and protecting the card from data thieves are two important considerations.

A new survey from Generali Global Assistance (GGA) found that 86 percent of consumers plan to do most of their holiday shopping online this year and 62 percent of shoppers plan on using just one card to make purchases.

Not only does using a single card make it easier to keep track of spending, security experts say it’s also safer.

"The pandemic has created the perfect environment for scammers, who are exploiting uncertainty and our more digitally focused reality, said Paige Schaffer, CEO, Global Identity and Cyber Protection Services at GGA. “Thirty-six percent of shoppers we surveyed this year indicated that their credit card provider experiencing a data breach was a top concern this holiday season.”

Best cards for security

If you’re using a single card, having one with robust fraud protection, as well as other consumer-friendly features, will work to your advantage. The personal finance site MoneyUnder30.com recently ranked credit cards for their security features.

It rated Wells Fargo Cash Wise Visa Card as best for fraud protection. It singled out the Discover It Cash Back card as best for security and cashback.

While security is very important, consumers also consider perks and benefits when choosing a credit card. But consumers should consider their needs. Do they need to transfer a balance or do they need cashback? In the era of COVID-19, travel rewards may be less important than they used to be.

Rating the cards

In its recent analysis of the best credit cards for 2021, CardRatings.com offered choices in 11 different categories. Some of the picks for next year include:

  • Best Flat-Rate Cash-Back Rewards – Citi Double Cash Card

  • Best for Families – Blue Cash Preferred Card from American Express

  • Best General Travel Rewards – Chase Sapphire Preferred

  • Best Balance Transfer Offer – Citi Diamond Preferred

  • Best Student Credit Card – Discover it Student Cash Back

  • Best for Small Business – Ink Business Preferred

The editors say they consulted consumers as well as experts, scoring cards on customer service, rewards, usability, and other factors.

ConsumerAffairs has also dug deep into various credit card offers, looking for the best fit for a wide range of needs. You’ll find our results here.

With so many consumer purchases shifting to online channels this year, it should come as no surprise that credit card usage is much higher than in past yea...

Article Image

Fed chairman tells Congress that the economy needs more stimulus

If you’re wondering why Congress and the Trump administration haven’t been able to enact another round of stimulus to help struggling Americans, you aren’t alone. Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell is on the same page.

In prepared remarks made to a Senate committee on Tuesday, Powell said the economy needs more help, and it needs it soon. Focusing primarily on the money Congress appropriated for the Fed’s lending programs, Powell credited that move with keeping the economy afloat during the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic.

“These programs serve as a backstop to key credit markets and have helped restore the flow of credit from private lenders through normal channels,” Powell told the Senate Finance Committee. “We have deployed these lending powers to an unprecedented extent.”

There’s $455 billion of CARES Act funds that have not been spent. Powell has asked that it be released for the Fed’s lending efforts, but Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin says the Trump administration thinks it would be better spent in providing aid directly to Americans and small businesses.

Partisan deadlock

Republicans and Democrats in Congress have not been able to agree on another round of stimulus help, even though both sides agree on several basic principles -- direct payments to Americans and help for small businesses.

The issue has taken on greater urgency with the arrival of December since several key provisions of the CARES Act expire at the end of this month. They include:

  • A moratorium on evictions for renters;

  • Suspended payments on student loans;

  • A tax credit for companies that retain their workforce;

  • $150 billion in aid to state and local government cannot be rolled into 2021;

  • A 13-week extension of unemployment benefits; and

  • Unemployment benefits for freelancers and contract workers.

‘Everything gets worse’

When these provisions expire at the end of the month, renters who are behind on their payments can be evicted, student loan borrowers must resume payments, businesses rewarded by the government for not laying off employees will no longer have that benefit, and millions of Americans could lose their unemployment benefits.

“Everything gets much worse on Dec. 31, with a lot of money running out and a lot of people in desperate straits,” Rep. David Price (D-N.C.), a senior member of the House Appropriations Committee, told the Wall Street Journal.

A vaccine may be in sight, but it could be months before a significant portion of the population is inoculated. In the meantime, Powell says the outlook for the economy is “extraordinarily uncertain.” He says a full economic recovery is unlikely until Americans are confident that it is safe to reengage in a broad range of activities.

If you’re wondering why Congress and the Trump administration haven’t been able to enact another round of stimulus to help struggling Americans, you aren’t...

Article Image

SoFi issues a new Mastercard credit card

Many households are facing staggering credit card debt, but fintech firm SoFi says its newly issued credit card could help with that.

The company says its first credit card promotes healthy financial habits and delivers on its mission to “help people get their money right.” The card, on Mastercard’s network, has no annual fee and provides up to 2 percent unlimited cashback when redeemed into SoFi Money or SoFi Invest accounts.

The two percent rate also applies when the rewards are used to pay down SoFi Student Loans or SoFi Personal Loans. The card launched last week with a small number of SoFi members. Consumers interested in the card can get on a waitlist for when the card membership is fully open.

‘Holistic, healthy money habits’

Company executives say the card is aimed at helping consumers chip away at the $14.3 trillion in consumer debt with rewards that are most valuable when used to pay off debt. Other options include investing the rewards or saving for a rainy day.

"Based on feedback from our members, we designed a credit card that helps our members pay down debt or invest in the future with every purchase while building holistic, healthy money habits," said SoFi CEO Anthony Noto. "Through simply using the SoFi Credit Card and following the same daily spending patterns that our members do today, we are making 'getting your money right' the most intuitive and convenient choice."

Cardholders who carry a balance on the card will also be rewarded if they use the card responsibly, the company says. The interest rate on balances will go down by 1 percent after 12 straight on-time credit card payments and will remain at that level as long as on-time payments continue. 

According to the Federal Reserve, U.S. consumers were carrying $1.08 trillion in credit card debt in the third quarter of 2019. That made up a little over 26 percent of consumers’ total debt at the time.

The growth of fintech

SoFi is one of the growing number of fintech firms that are providing financial services directly to consumers by using technology to provide many of the services traditionally associated with banks. The companies tend to be favored by younger consumers.

SoFi was founded in 2011 by four students at the Stanford Graduate School of business. One of the principal aims was to provide a more affordable student loan product.

"SoFi continues to create thoughtful and innovative products to empower its members to pay down debt and improve their financial lives," said Linda Kirkpatrick, president, U.S. Issuers at Mastercard. "We are proud to build upon our relationship with SoFi and work closely to arm their members with benefits and features that are directly relevant and meaningful to their lives."

Many households are facing staggering credit card debt, but fintech firm SoFi says its newly issued credit card could help with that.The company says i...

Article Image

Consumers think Halloween’s biggest fright is the scare the pandemic is putting on their finances

With the pandemic’s first Halloween less than a week away, a new WalletHub study finds that consumers are still spending billions on the holiday, but overall, they’re feeling life is a little spookier than they’d prefer.

The survey -- WalletHub’s Halloween Spending & Financial Fears Survey -- lays out these consumer frights:

  • A whopping 130 million Americans think the coronavirus is the scariest thing about Halloween this year.

  • Nearly 40 percent of Americans are more afraid of credit card debt than the coronavirus.

“Almost 40 percent of Americans are more scared of credit card debt than the coronavirus in part because of political allegiances, but also due to the fact that credit card debt might seem more tangible to an indebted individual who has yet to know someone with COVID-19,” said Jill Gonzalez, a WalletHub analyst. 

“Current events aside, money was the number one stressor for Americans for many years before the coronavirus pandemic, so it shouldn’t be a surprise that credit card debt and money problems in general still scare a lot of us, maybe even more so than before.”

Money concerns are widespread this year

The survey found that the pandemic has led to an increase in the number of consumers experiencing money-related worries.

  • Concerns about money problems are hitting 22 million more people this year than last year;

  • Close to 90 percent of Americans think that politicians prey on peoples' financial fears;

  • Roughly 13 million more Americans are scared about their kids' financial futures in 2020 than in 2019;

  • Almost 33 percent of people think their finances are a personal horror show.

Gonzalez said that consumers think the “horror show” label applies for a variety of reasons, including the pandemic’s impact on the U.S. economy, as well as debt levels which continue to be high despite showing recent improvement.

“It’s tough to say your finances are looking good when you’re out of work or waiting for business to pick back up. You can’t ignore the possibility that some people are just being dramatic when saying their finances are a horror show, either,” she said.

With the pandemic’s first Halloween less than a week away, a new WalletHub study finds that consumers are still spending billions on the holiday, but overa...

Article Image

Consumers showing new interest in store credit cards

An unusually large number of consumers have expressed interest in signing up for a store credit card this holiday shopping season. 

The survey, conducted for CompareCards, found that 44 percent of Americans say they're at least somewhat likely to apply for a store card during the holiday shopping season. That's up from 32 percent in 2019 and 24 percent in 2018.

A store credit card is a Visa or Mastercard that is co-branded with a national retailer. Consumers are often offered a special discount on a purchase if they apply for the card.

The survey authors say the findings are somewhat odd since more than half of people in the survey said they've had a store credit card in the past and have regretted getting one.

What’s changed?

What’s different now? The authors point out that the interest rate on these store-branded credit cards has come down from recent highs, but they’re still higher than the rate on regular credit cards.

Another possible reason for the shift in sentiment could be that more consumers need a credit card. At the beginning of the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic, credit card issuers unilaterally closed many credit card accounts or lowered credit limits.

A previous CompareCards survey found that about 70 million people – more than one-third of credit cardholders –  involuntarily had a credit limit reduced or a credit card account closed in a 60-day period from mid-May to mid-July.

Lenders moved swiftly to reduce their risk, fearing widespread unemployment would lead to a wave of defaults. It was impossible for them to determine which of their customers had lost their income -- and were thus more likely to default -- and which were still gainfully employed.

Easy to get

Since store-branded credit cards are easier to get -- clerks often try to sign you up in the checkout line -- more consumers may be giving them another look. But their interest rates tend to be on the high side and the rewards are usually less-generous than traditional rewards cards.

Store cards may also look more attractive to consumers than in the past. In addition to slightly lower interest rates, the rewards are getting better.

More retailers are trying to drive spending by creating tiered-rewards programs that let consumers earn rewards faster the more they spend. That’s fine, but remember those higher interest rates. Carrying a balance can wipe out those rewards very quickly.

The survey found that nearly half the people who currently have a store-branded credit card are carrying a high-interest balance. Fifty-nine percent of consumers with a store credit card say it’s the card they use the most.

An unusually large number of consumers have expressed interest in signing up for a store credit card this holiday shopping season. The survey, conducte...

Article Image

Venmo launches a new Visa credit card

Venmo has introduced its first credit card, issued by Synchrony and powered by Visa. Members can manage their card in the Venmo app and earn cashback on each purchase.

Just like the app, the card allows users to transfer money or split purchases with friends. A nice feature of the card is that the top reward category changes based on the customer’s biggest spending category.

Instead of having to choose a category or have one assigned by the credit card issuer each quarter, the new Venmo card will pay 3 percent cash back on the customer’s largest purchase category during a billing cycle. One month it might be airlines, another month it might be groceries.

The card pays 2 percent cash back on items in the second-largest category and up to 1 percent on all other purchases. There is no annual fee.

Spending categories include groceries, bills and utilities, health and beauty, gasoline, entertainment, dining and nightlights, transportation, and travel.

Cash goes into the Venmo account

When a customer earns cash, it’s automatically placed in their Venmo account, allowing them to easily use the money. They can use it to make statement payments, make purchases, or send it to family or friends using the app.

The card has many of the same features of the app. Users can manage their card and spending using the mobile app and track spending activity in real time, organized by spending categories, and split and share purchases.

They can also monitor how much cashback they’ve received, make payments, and otherwise manage the credit card – all in the app. Customers can also choose to receive real-time alerts to help them see when and where purchases are made, and when cashback is applied to their account.

Minimal contact during purchases

Venmo says its credit card is also easier to use. It has an RFID-enabled chip so customers can tap to pay at the point-of-sale, allowing for minimal contact, instead of inserting the chip or swiping their card at the point-of-sale.

Venmo’s card also takes advantage of parent company PayPal’s QR code-scanning for credit-card purchases at some brick and mortar and online retailers. To start, the Venmo card’s QR code will only work for card activation and for other Venmo users to send card customers a payment.

Venmo is doing a soft rollout, making the new card available only to a small percentage of current Venmo users this year. The card will be fully available in the first quarter of next year.

Venmo has introduced its first credit card, issued by Synchrony and powered by Visa. Members can manage their card in the Venmo app and earn cashback on ea...

Article Image

LendingTree introduces free app to manage finances

LendingTree, an online loan marketplace, has introduced a new app designed to connect all of a users’ financial accounts in one place. The goal is to help consumers better manage their financial lives.

Most people with bank accounts have online access to their accounts. The same is true if they have a mortgage, credit cards, or investment accounts. The new app, My LendingTree, connects with consumers' checking and savings accounts, in addition to credit cards and loans, providing a comprehensive financial overview in a single program.   

The app connects to bank accounts at over 11,000 institutions. By integrating checking and savings account information, the app can show budgets, spending habits, transaction history, and cash flow analysis while also letting users check credit scores, savings recommendations, and identity monitoring updates. 

By consolidating all of this information in one place, a user doesn’t need to log into multiple accounts and can go to one place to keep up with how they’re doing financially. The app is available with a free download.

"Fintech is helping to make money easier, which often begins with understanding your financial situation and the options available to you," said Eric Sager, COO of Plaid, the platform that powers the app. "MyLendingTree now makes it easy to securely link your financial accounts through Plaid, including loans and other debts, and get a comprehensive view of your finances to help you improve your money management."

Monitoring finances and making smarter decisions

In addition to showing information from bank accounts, the app provides a cash flow analysis, using data from past transactions to predict future spending needs.

It has a budget tracker feature, informing users how their monthly spending lines up with their recommended budget. It allows users to set their own budgets and alter them when conditions call for it. The budgeting feature also shows users a snapshot of the categories where they are spending the most money and where they may be off-track. It provides the ability to drill-down to see transaction-level information.

The monthly spending feature looks at the current month and compares those expenses to previous months. The transaction history feature provides expense and income records across all connected accounts instead of being limited to a single account or bank. The accounts summary gives users the ability to see all of their financial accounts -- checking, savings, loans, and credit cards -- all in one place.

Sushil Sharma, chief product officer at LendingTree, says the app will empower consumers with a better understanding of their financial lives so that they can make smarter financial decisions in the future.

LendingTree, an online loan marketplace, has introduced a new app designed to connect all of a users’ financial accounts in one place. The goal is to help...

Article Image

Consumers have paid off a record amount of debt during the pandemic, study finds

It’s becoming increasingly clear that one effect of the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic has been a change in consumers’ financial habits. A new study of consumers’ credit card debt shows the biggest reduction on record as the pandemic shut down the economy.

In its latest credit card debt study, WalletHub reports that Americans began the year owing more than $1 trillion in credit card debt after a $76.7 billion spending spree during 2019. But when the pandemic arrived with full force in March, consumers’ first impulse was to pay off debt. Credit card balances dropped by a record $60 billion.

The frugality continued in the second quarter. Not only did consumers put less on plastic in April through June, they paid off another $58 billion -- a record paydown for the second quarter.

‘Generous unemployment benefits’ helped

When 2020 draws to a close, WalletHub researchers predict that consumers will end the year with less credit card debt than when they began, the first time that’s happened since the end of the Great Recession in 2009.

“The fact that U.S. consumers paid off $58.1 billion in credit card debt during the second quarter of 2020 is largely attributable to the generous unemployment benefits that laid-off workers were still receiving at the time by Congressional decree, as well as the overall efforts people have made to cut back on spending and generally de-risk their finances in the face of historic uncertainty,” said Jill Gonzalez, WalletHub analyst. 

“It might seem counterintuitive that debt levels would decline when so many people are out of work, but that’s also when people become most frugal and when credit card issuers get stingier with approval decisions and credit limits.”

A Gallup study released this week tends to back up the conclusion that consumers have become more careful with their spending during the pandemic. The survey -- taken after the personal benefits from the CARES Act expired -- shows that 54 percent of Americans are currently saving at least some of their money and plan to continue saving versus spending what they have in the near future.

In another encouraging sign, 76 percent of the people with the ability to save money plan to keep socking it away over the next six months. Another 28 percent say they’ll spend their money on basic goods and services; only 13 percent will splurge a bit on vacation or travel; and 10 percent will use their savings to pay off debts, such as credit cards.

And while day trading in the stock market has become more popular since the pandemic, it apparently involves only a small subset of investors. Seventy-nine percent of the respondents in the Gallup study said they prefer to tuck money away in a savings account, keeping it in cash.

It’s becoming increasingly clear that one effect of the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic has been a change in consumers’ financial habits. A new study of co...

Article Image

Nearly half of millennial travel credit cardholders have canceled their card during the pandemic

At one point during the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic, air travel was down 96 percent. Hotel bookings have cratered. Cruise ships remain tied up at the pier.

So maybe it’s no surprise that consumers would begin asking themselves why they’re paying an annual fee to carry a travel rewards card. Many millennials have apparently decided it’s no longer worth it.

A new ValuePenguin survey shows that 41 percent of millennial travel cardholders closed a travel rewards card since the beginning of the pandemic. Another 34 percent say they’ve thought about doing it.

More than half of those who were laid off or furloughed have cashed out some or all of their points or miles due to the pandemic's impact on their ability to travel. Again, a significant group -- 23 percent -- is considering it.

Not that surprising

In a way, the numbers are not surprising since many travel rewards cards carry hefty annual fees. While the points and miles can be very rewarding, some cards charge more than $100 a year to cardholders.

With the pandemic discouraging consumers from traveling, there’s little opportunity to rack up miles and points. But cardholders still have to pay the annual fee.

The survey also found that 28 percent of Americans who booked a trip using their travel rewards lost their miles and points when they had to cancel the trip due to the pandemic. 

"It doesn't surprise me at all that many people are closing travel cards right now," said Matt Schulz, chief credit analyst at LendingTree, ValuePenguin's parent company. "Many Americans are simply trying to keep food on the table, and hoarding travel miles and points just doesn't make any sense for a lot of people at this time."

Credit score impact

Canceling a credit card will have a negative impact on your credit score. Your access to credit is one part of the score’s formula, so your score will dip when the amount of credit is lowered. However, in most cases, the decrease is small and temporary.

Amid all the account-closing, some consumers are actually applying for new travel rewards credit cards. Forty-five percent of millennials have applied for a new card since March. Schulz says it could be a sign of optimism.

“Americans love travel, and many cannot wait for the day when they can get back on a plane,” he said. 

Even if that’s the case, Schulz and other personal finance experts say there may be better choices when it comes to a credit card. A simple cashback card may be more rewarding and rarely carries an annual fee.

If you’re considering applying for a new credit card, ConsumerAffairs’ guide to the “Best Credit Cards” may help you pick the one that’s best for you.

At one point during the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic, air travel was down 96 percent. Hotel bookings have cratered. Cruise ships remain tied up at the p...

Article Image

More consumers are losing access to credit during the pandemic

As soon as the pandemic threw millions of Americans out of work, credit card lenders began canceling cardholder accounts and reducing credit lines. New data suggests that this trend has only accelerated.

A survey by credit card site CompareCards reveals that about 70 million people – more than one-third of credit cardholders –  involuntarily had a credit limit reduced or a credit card account closed in a 60-day period from mid-May to mid-July.

Lenders moved swiftly to reduce their risk. It was impossible for them to determine which of their customers had lost their income -- and were thus more likely to default -- and which were gainfully employed.

But the survey shows lenders haven’t tightened credit for everyone. Millennial customers were the cardholders most likely to have a credit limit reduced or account closed involuntarily. 

High-income cardholders not immune

Customers with the highest incomes -- who are often among the biggest spenders and have the highest credit limits -- were the most likely to say their credit availability had only been reduced in the wake of the pandemic.

When credit limits were reduced, the survey shows it wasn’t by a lot. The most common credit limit reduction was between $501 and $1,000. But 22 percent of customers in the survey said they saw their credit availability shrink by $5,000 or more.

About 89 percent of those whose credit availability declined were notified by their lender of the change, but not all were given a reason. Of those who were told why there was a change in their account, about half said it was because of a decrease in their credit score or late payment.

Credit score impact

Losing access to credit will almost always send a credit score even lower. A score will go down if a credit card company reduces the cardholder’s credit limit. It could go down even more if there is a balance on the card. The credit limit reduction means the cardholder is using a higher percentage of available credit, usually a drag on credit scores.

“We're several months into the pandemic and one of the few things we know for certain is that no one knows exactly when this is going to end. Because of that, it's likely that we will see banks continue to be cautious when lending,” the authors write. 

There are some things consumers can do to make sure they aren’t the next to lose access to credit. Consider using any dormant cards more. Put a small, recurring subscription – such as Spotify or Netflix – on that little-used card to ensure that it is used each month. Then, set up automatic payments so you never pay late. 

As soon as the pandemic threw millions of Americans out of work, credit card lenders began canceling cardholder accounts and reducing credit lines. New dat...

Article Image

Consumers use rewards credit cards to help get by during the pandemic

If you have a travel rewards credit card in your wallet, you may be asking yourself just how useful that will be in the midst of a pandemic

Air travel has plunged since the coronavirus (COVID-19) swept the world, and cruises have been canceled. Many countries are temporarily closing their borders to travelers from other countries, another inducement to stay home. In the U.S., some states where coronavirus cases are low are discouraging travelers from states where cases have spiked.

For travel rewards cardholders, that may mean a lot less travel in the months ahead. Not only are they missing out on racking up rewards points, but they are also likely paying a hefty annual fee for the privilege of having the card.

The Wall Street Journal reports that major banks are taking steps to discourage customers from canceling these highly profitable cards, noting that JPMorgan Chase is delaying a $100 increase to its $450 annual fee on its flagship Sapphire Reserve Card.

Chase has joined Citibank and other major card issuers in adding other non-travel rewards to their cards to keep them in consumers’ wallets. However, consumers should carefully measure the value of those potential rewards against the annual fee.

Cash may be king

Having a rewards card that provides points or cashback on routine purchases like gasoline and groceries may make more sense in these times, and these types of cards rarely carry an annual fee.

In a new report, PayPal offers research showing that a significant number of consumers are using their credit card rewards to stretch their budgets. Nearly a third of consumers have used rewards to purchase the things they need most, such as groceries. 

"More and more people across the country are turning to their credit card rewards as a helpful and easy way to make their dollars go farther, and in the current environment, two-thirds of Americans now view these rewards balances as a way to buy the things they need such as groceries and other essentials," said Jill Cress, vice president of consumer marketing at PayPal.

Unaware of their rewards

At the same time, the research found that 39 percent of people with rewards credit cards were completely unaware of their rewards balance. Cress says it’s not only important to incorporate those rewards into the household budgets, but consumers should also think carefully about the credit cards they have and the kinds of spending they reward.

"With travel and luxury items still less of a priority for many right now, our research shows that people are instead tapping into their rewards balances to support small businesses in their community and to give back to causes," Cress said.

Replacing a travel rewards card that carries an annual fee with a no-fee card providing cashback on everyday purchases may be a prudent step in this new environment, and there are many of these cards to choose from.

ConsumerAffairs has researched the best cashback credit cards here.

If you have a travel rewards credit card in your wallet, you may be asking yourself just how useful that will be in the midst of a pandemicAir travel h...

Article Image

Survey finds new credit card accounts have plunged 73 percent

Credit card companies slammed on the brakes in March as millions of consumers lost their jobs. The number of new credit card accounts plunged 73 percent between March 15th and April 15th, according to a survey by CompareCards.

While it’s not surprising that lenders would try to reduce their risk in the face of rising unemployment, the speed in which they acted is unprecedented. Then again, the economic disaster from the coronavirus (COVID-19) shutdown happened virtually overnight. 

Prior to the pandemic, credit card companies aggressively sought to open new accounts because of a robust economy. In the new environment, consumers may find it will be much harder to get all types of credit.

Economic uncertainty

Compared to the March-to-April periods from 2017 to 2019, the number of new cards slowed to a trickle this year. When lenders did issue cards, the credit limits were on average $700 lower.

“When the economy is uncertain, as we are currently witnessing, plans change and lenders get nervous,” CompareCards wrote in a blog post. “When lenders become wary, they resort to reducing credit limits on existing accounts, or even close those accounts altogether, because all that available credit just looks like unnecessary risk to the bank.”

Even if you already have a credit card, it doesn’t mean you’re going to keep it. As unemployment surged in late March, credit card companies moved quickly to close some customers’ accounts. 

At the end of April, about 25 percent of consumers reported that their credit card company had closed an account or lowered their credit limit.

‘High risk of failure to pay’

ConsumerAffairs has received scores of complaints from consumers like Robert, of Houston, who told us he had several credit cards with Synchrony, which he said had continued to increase his credit limits over the years.

“Then, in one single day, Synchrony closed every single account without notice,” Robert wrote in his ConsumerAffairs post. ”Received a letter stating ‘Activity on accounts indicative of high risk of failure to pay.’ How is that possible when there was less than $3k total on just 2 of the several accounts I had with them?”

Robert also said his credit score dropped by more than 100 points because of the loss of credit, which he says significantly increased his debt ratio.

Credit card companies are often quick to react to perceived risk because credit card debt is not secured by any kind of collateral. If an account holder doesn’t pay, there is no means to secure payment without going to court.

But in the wake of the coronavirus, some lenders are even worried about secured debt. Earlier this month, Wells Fargo announced it was temporarily suspending new home equity lines of credit (HELOC), joining other major banks moving to reduce their credit exposure.

Consumers whose credit card accounts have been closed by their lender may be able to restore access by applying for a secured credit card. ConsumerAffairs has researched the best secured credit card companies here.

Credit card companies slammed on the brakes in March as millions of consumers lost their jobs. The number of new credit card accounts plunged 73 percent be...

Article Image

Navy Federal Credit Union rolls out four new credit card promotions

Navy Federal Credit Union is ramping up the competition in the rewards credit card space by introducing four new credit card promotions this week. The cards, designed for different uses and different consumers, all offer rewards of some kind.

The Navy Federal Visa Signature Flagship Rewards card provides 50,000 bonus points -- which translates to a $500 value -- to new cardholders who spend at least $4,000 within 90 days of opening the account.

It could be a good choice for consumers preparing to make a major purchase that would get them over the $4,000 threshold. It’s also good for frequent travelers because it offers three times the points on travel expenses and two times the points on all other purchases. 

While that can be attractive for frequent travelers, there is a $49 annual fee. But cardholders can receive a statement credit of up to $100 for Global Entry or TSA Pre-check. 

The interest rate on balances ranges from 11.49 percent to 18 percent, and the offer is good through the end of April.

For groceries, gasoline, and restaurants

The Navy Federal More Rewards American Express Card has a lower spending threshold. Spend just $3,000 within 90 days of opening the account and you’ll get 25,000 bonus points worth $250.

The card pays three times the points for purchases at supermarkets, for gasoline and transit, and at restaurants. It pays one times the points on all other purchases.

There’s no annual fee, and the interest rate on balances ranges from 11.15 percent to 18 percent. The credit card offer is good through the end of August.

$150 cashback

Navy Federal’s Cash Rewards card pays cardholders $150 cashback if they spend at least $3,000 within the first 90 days of account activity. 

They’ll also get an interest rate of 1.99 percent on purchases for the first six months, making it an attractive tool for consumers who need to finance a major purchase for a short period of time.

After the introductory period, the rate ranges from 11.15 percent to 18 percent. There is no annual fee, and the offer is good through June.

Balance transfer at 0 percent

The Navy Federal Platinum card isn’t technically a rewards card; it’s a balance transfer card. However, these kinds of cards can sometimes be the most rewarding.

New cardholders are eligible for a 0 percent introductory rate on balance transfers for 12 months after opening the account with no balance transfer fee. After that, the rate ranges from 7.49 percent to 18 percent.

There is no annual fee and the offer is good through the end of December.

Navy Federal Credit Union is ramping up the competition in the rewards credit card space by introducing four new credit card promotions this week. The card...

Article Image

Young consumers are going into debt seeking health and fitness, survey shows

Millennials and Generation Z tend to be fitness and health enthusiasts, and they also seem to have a lot of credit card debt. Could those two facts be related?

They could, according to a new survey by CompareCards. The survey found 38 percent of millennials and 41 percent of Generation Z have had or are currently dealing with credit card debt due to fitness-related expenses.

Young people, who tend to be more active and in better shape than their older peers, are more likely to go into debt to stay that way. About 28 percent of all other age groups go into debt paying for gym memberships, exercise equipment, and expensive food they believe to be more healthy.

When it comes to going into debt on fitness, millennials and Generation Z spend an average of $124 per month, the survey shows. The most common expense is a gym membership, purchased by 76 percent of young people.

But 32 percent of this age group also pulls out the plastic to purchase workout attire, 22 percent purchase exercise equipment, and 22 percent subscribe to a mobile fitness app. 

Subscriptions

Subscriptions can be small expenses that add up when there are a lot of them, and the CompareCards survey suggests younger consumers not only have fitness subscriptions, but diet subscriptions too.

Forty-three percent of younger consumers say they spend extra money each month on diet and nutrition, either for services of different kinds of food. Sixteen percent of millennials and 14 percent of Generation Z pay for a nutritionist. Eighteen percent of millennials and 13 percent of Generation Z pay for cleanses, while 14 percent of both generations purchase personalized meal plans.

“What's more, of the 28 percent of survey respondents who said they're currently dieting, 45 percent said their grocery spending has increased, too,” the authors write.

Social media pressure

What’s behind this hyper-focus on health and fitness? The survey suggests it could be a new way young consumers seek status.

More than 25 percent of Generation Z and 17 percent of millennials admit they are driven by social media influencers to spend money on fitness and nutrition. Across all ages, that number is 13 percent.

While preserving your health will pay dividends in the long-run, the experts at CompareCards suggest going into debt to do so can be detrimental to your financial health.

One in four Americans has at least one subscription-based fitness or diet expense. That number jumps to two in five among Generation Z and slightly over one in three for millennials.

Millennials and Generation Z tend to be fitness and health enthusiasts, and they also seem to have a lot of credit card debt. Could those two facts be rela...

Article Image

Around 46 million consumers expect to miss a credit card due date in 2020

A whopping 46 million American consumers say they’re likely to miss at least one credit card due date in 2020.

A new WalletHub credit cards survey shows that the cocktail of overzealous spending and credit card dependence may be getting the best of consumers and putting them in the difficult position of determining which bills they can pay based on their monthly income. 

WalletHub’s survey took a look at how consumers handle late payments and what their feelings are when it comes to leaning on plastic money going forward.

Here are the highlights of the study:

  • Credit card issuers are forgiving…if you ask nicely. Almost 90 percent of the consumers who asked forgiveness for missing a due date were given a pass on the late fee. Women aren’t shy about asking to get a late fee waived -- with that demographic asking about 18 percent more than men. However, women are also 2 percent less likely to get their waiver request approved. 

  • Payment priorities change with age. The 18-44 demographic has the most worrywarts when it comes to missing credit card payments. The 45-59 demographic does most of its hand-wringing about their mortgage, and those over the age of 59 say tax payments are what makes them the illest at ease.

  • Luxury can lead to lapses. The more people make, the more they apparently forget. The survey shows that high-income consumers are nearly twice as likely to miss a payment due to absentmindedness as people with lower incomes. 

  • Men and women react differently to fees. Do you feel “punished” when you’re confronted with a late fee? Of the women surveyed, 39 percent said they were more likely to feel that way than men; however, men are twice as likely to feel “indifferent.”

Stretched out?

“The reason that roughly 46 million people expect to miss at least one credit card due date in 2020, according to WalletHub’s latest credit card survey, is that we’re stretched too thin -- in terms of both time and money,” said WalletHub CEO Odysseas Papadimitriou. 

“U.S. credit card users started 2020 with more than $1 trillion in credit card debt. Up until this point, we’ve managed to keep our accounts in good standing at historical rates. However, expecting to miss due dates is a sign of cracks in the foundation. And not only do 18 percent of people expect to miss at least one credit card due date in 2020, but 30 percent say that not having enough money is the reason we’re most likely to be late.”

Taking the stress out of late payments

If you fall into the oh-no-not-again category when it comes to paying your credit card bill on time, there are some steps you can take to stop that slide.

“The easiest way to avoid late payments, and the fees and credit score damage that can accompany them, is to set up automatic monthly bill payments from a checking account for at least the minimum amount due each month. This will at least remove forgetfulness as a potential cause,” said WalletHub CEO Odysseas Papadimitriou. 

“Automated payments won’t do much good if you don’t have enough money in your bank account, however. So careful budgeting and saving are key, too.”

Consider asking for help

Besides Papadimitriou’s suggestion, there’s also the credit counseling route. 

Unbeknownst to most consumers, credit counseling agencies certified by the National Foundation for Credit Counseling (NFCC) offer free debt counseling. Whether it’s a last resort or you just feel like you need to get a grip on your credit card use, those agencies can be a good -- and understanding -- resource. 

ConsumerAffairs has put together a free guide on the best credit counselors. If you ever find yourself needing some help, it might be a good place to start. You can find the guide to credit counselors here, and the guide to debt relief programs is available here.

A whopping 46 million American consumers say they’re likely to miss at least one credit card due date in 2020.A new WalletHub credit cards survey shows...

Article Image

Even high-income consumers are feeling squeezed by credit card debt

On the heels of a LendingTree study that found a majority of Americans entered the year feeling financial stress, another survey points to consumers’ growing financial angst.

In an analysis of Federal Reserve Data, OnlineLoans reports that 10 percent of respondents think they are losing ground financially. Nearly half of consumers who say it’s difficult to get by say they’re doing worse than their parents were at that age.

The flip side of that, however, is that an overwhelming majority -- 75 percent -- say they’re living comfortably or doing okay. That flies in the face of the LendingTree study, issued last week, which found that 60 percent of people are carrying a debt load that causes them stress.

The credit card squeeze

But the latest study doesn’t focus on income; it notes that some high-income households struggle due to spending. And there’s a single factor that plays an outsized role in both studies -- credit card debt.

“Even though the current U.S. economic climate is quite strong, Americans still struggle to afford their standard of living, and many are not prepared for an unforeseen emergency,” the authors write. “Seventeen percent of Americans said they couldn't pay some bills this month. And the biggest culprit was the credit card bill, which 7 percent of the survey pool – including 4 percent of those living comfortably – pointed to as a major concern.”

Outstanding credit card debt passed the $1 trillion mark a year ago and is beginning to catch up with student loan debt. While most consumer interest rates have fallen since then, credit card interest rates have not.

Balance transfers

An often-overlooked tool in reducing this debt is applying for a balance transfer card with an introductory low-to-no interest rate. Until the end of February, Navy Federal Credit Union is offering its nine million members an introductory rate of 1.99 percent on new purchases and transferred balances.

Justin Zeidman, manager of credit card products for Navy Federal, says what makes the firm’s offer attractive to debt-strapped consumers is the fact there is no balance transfer fee that is charged by most balance transfer cards.

“A lot of people look at a 0 percent APR on a balance transfer and assume that it’s free,” Zeidman told ConsumerAffairs. “In reality, if you’re transferring a $5,000 balance to a card with a 4 percent balance transfer fee it’s costing you $200 just to move the money.”

Zeidman says it’s also important to read the fine print and see what the rate adjusts to once the introductory period is over. Chances are good that there will be a balance remaining on the card once the introductory period expires, so the rate you pay after that is important. But paying off as much of your balance as possible at a rock bottom rate can have a profound psychological effect.

“Seeing your interest charges rack up at a much smaller pace creates a greater sense in the consumer’s mind of being able to get out of debt, to see that light at the end of the tunnel,” Zeidman said.

ConsumerAffairs has checked out some other balance transfer credit card offers here.

On the heels of a LendingTree study that found a majority of Americans entered the year feeling financial stress, another survey points to consumers’ growi...

Article Image

FTC cracks down on comparison shopping site over fake reviews and deceptive rankings

Reviews of products and services are essential for savvy consumers who want to do their homework and make the best financial decision. But one such site that offered these reviews has caught the ire of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC). 

The agency says that LendEDU -- which offers comparisons on financial products like student loans, personal loans, and credit cards -- misled consumers by not remaining objective and unbiased when ranking various services. Regulators also charge the company of using fake reviews to make certain products appear more desirable. 

“LendEDU told consumers that its financial product rankings were based on objective and unbiased information about the quality of the product being offered, but in fact LendEDU sold its rankings to the highest bidder,” said Andrew Smith, the director of the FTC’s Bureau of Consumer Protection. 

“These misrepresentations undermine consumer trust, and we will hold lead generators like LendEDU accountable for their false promises of objectivity.”

Misleading reviews

The FTC’s complaint states that LendEDU misrepresented that the rankings on its site were not affected by payments from advertisers, even though that wasn’t the case. But officials say the deception didn’t stop there.

Although LendEDU claimed that reviews on its site were based on actual experiences from impartial consumers, officials say that many of them were written by company employees, their family or friends, or other people who had a professional relationship with the company. Many of these reviews were also used on other third-party sites.

Under a proposed settlement, LendEDU has agreed to pay $350,000 to settle the FTC’s charges. It is also barred from making these kinds of misrepresentations in the future. 

Reviews of products and services are essential for savvy consumers who want to do their homework and make the best financial decision. But one such site th...

Article Image

Improving your credit score might improve your love life

As Valentine’s Day draws near, that new dress or time spent working out in the gym might not be nearly as helpful for getting a date as getting a handle on your finances.

The 2020 Valentine’s Day Spending Survey by personal finance site WalletHub shows that having a high credit score might give you an edge in establishing a romantic relationship. In fact, the survey found 51 percent of people would not marry someone with bad credit.

Credit scores are more important for women than men. Sixty percent of women say a subprime credit score would be a deal-breaker; around 41 percent of men say they feel the same way.

The survey suggests women tend to be a lot more practical about financial matters than men. Men are three times as likely as women to go into debt to purchase a Valentine’s Day gift.

Worst than bad breath

Other nuggets from the survey reveal that four out of ten people -- both men and women -- say irresponsible spending is a bigger turnoff than bad breath. Forty-six percent of people would break up over irresponsible spending, the second biggest reason behind cheating.

WalletHub analyst Jill Gonzalez says the Great Recession put a greater emphasis on financial values as men and women consider mates.

“The fact that 51 percent of people say they would not marry someone with bad credit should be the biggest wake-up call for daters,” Gonzalez said. “It makes sense when you consider that bad credit can cost people hundreds of thousands of dollars over the course of a lifetime.”

Be honest

The good news is that a bad credit score can be improved. All it takes is a little time, along with paying all your bills on time and reducing your debt. But should the subject of your credit score come up on that first or second date, honesty is the best policy.

A recent survey by TD Bank found that 31 percent of millennials would consider breaking off a relationship with a partner who was hiding debt or a bad credit score. The pollsters talked to consumers who are married, in a committed relationship, or divorced.

Unfortunately, financial secrecy in a relationship is not uncommon. That same survey found that 27 percent of millennials are currently keeping a financial secret from their partner, more than any other generation. Nearly half of that 27 percent is hiding credit card debt.

Older generations are also keeping secrets. Among the silent generation and baby boomers, a financial secret is most likely to involve a bank account the partner doesn’t know about.

"It's important that couples are honest and open about their money challenges,” said Rachel DeAlto, relationship expert, coach, and television personality. “Oftentimes a partner will hide a credit card bill or low score due to guilt or embarrassment, yet when the debt comes to light it's often not the debt that creates the conflict - it's the secrecy." 

As Valentine’s Day draws near, that new dress or time spent working out in the gym might not be nearly as helpful for getting a date as getting a handle on...

Article Image

Credit card use is up 7 percent in the last five years

The number of U.S. consumers using credit cards has increased 7 percent over the last five years, according to a new report from Packaged Facts.

The report’s authors say credit card use usually goes up during good economic times. Steady economic growth and an increasingly healthy job market in recent years have helped to provide a widening pool of credit-worthy credit card customers, and good times have encouraged them to spend.

Another factor driving increased credit card us is e-commerce, which is taking an increasingly bigger market share of retail and which is made much easier with payment cards.

The report found that consumers increasingly favor general-purpose credit cards over so-called private-label credit cards. This suggests that, after several years of growth, private label cards may now be less popular with consumers.

A private label credit card is a store-branded card that is meant to be used at a specific store. These cards are managed by a bank or commercial finance company for retailers like department and specialty stores and for some airlines.

The trend of going cashless

The growth in credit card use may also suggest the continuation of the trend of consumers paying for virtually everything using plastic. A 2018 Pew Research Center study found that 29 percent of U.S. adults said they make no purchases using physical currency during a typical week, up from 24 percent in 2015.

“Most notably, adults with an annual household income of $75,000 or more are more than twice as likely as those earning less than $30,000 a year to say they do not make any purchases using cash in a typical week (41% vs. 18%),” Pew said in a release.

“Conversely, lower-income Americans are about four times as likely as higher-income Americans to say they make all or almost all of their purchases using cash (29% vs. 7%),” the Center said.

More consumers can qualify

The higher income group is also more likely to have a bank account and to be able to qualify for a credit card. Packaged Facts’ report showing credit card use is rising could also mean that consumers who previously couldn’t qualify now can.

But a 2019 report from Origin, Hill Holliday’s independent research arm, suggests most consumers aren’t ready to give up cash completely. The survey found that 76 percent of consumers still carry some cash, even if they mostly use other methods to pay for things. Fifty-five percent said they “hated” the idea of completely abandoning cash.

Most merchants -- particularly small businesses -- also prefer that their customers pay with cash because payment cards always carry some type of fee.

The number of U.S. consumers using credit cards has increased 7 percent over the last five years, according to a new report from Packaged Facts.The rep...

Article Image

Most consumers don’t understand 0 percent balance transfer cards, study finds

Many consumers are waking up today with the realization that they have overloaded their credit card during the holidays with a balance that will take months to pay off.

It happens. But transferring the balance to a new card with a 0 percent interest rate for the first year or so can help you pay down the balance faster and spare you the double-digit interest charges you would pay otherwise.

In its annual balance transfer card report, CompareCards.com reviewed the terms and conditions of 167 credit cards that allow balance transfers. Once again this year, the researchers found that interest-free introductory periods are still easy to find.

In searching for a card, consider one that doesn’t carry a one-time balance transfer fee. Most balance transfer cards charge a fee of at least 3 percent. On a $5,000 balance, that comes to $150.

The Chase Slate card now offers a 0 percent rate on transferred balances for 15 months. If you transfer the balance during the first 60 days the account is open, you won’t pay a balance transfer fee. If you wait until later than that you’ll pay a hefty 5 percent fee.

Common misconceptions

The researchers found that 75 percent of the consumers surveyed mistakenly believed that they would be assessed interest on the full balance if they didn’t pay it off completely during the transfer card’s introductory period. That’s not the case, although that’s exactly what happens with a merchant’s “deferred interest” plan.

With a balance transfer card, 100 percent of your payments are used to pay down the balance during the introductory period. At the end of the introductory period, the card’s prevailing rate kicks in. The rate can be as high as 25 percent for many balance transfer cards, so it’s important to pay as much of the balance as possible during the interest-free introductory period.

According to the survey, nearly 20 percent of consumers with credit cards plan to apply for a new card that will allow them to transfer a balance. Another 32 percent said they’re thinking about it.

This is a fairly common practice. About half of all credit card customers say they have opened a new credit card account just to transfer a balance and take advantage of a 0 percent interest rate. Of that number, 18 percent have done it more than once.

The experts at ConsumerAffairs have researched balance transfer credit cards with an attractive introductory promotion. You can check out their findings here. 

Many consumers are waking up today with the realization that they have overloaded their credit card during the holidays with a balance that will take month...

Article Image

Trying to game a rewards credit card program could get your account shut down

New reports are circulating that credit card companies, hotels, and airlines are going after the jugular of consumers who knowingly violate program rules in an effort to pump up reward points and miles. In the minds of the loyalty rewards providers, this is pure and simple abuse.

The games people play

Smarty-pants consumers have evidently been trying to work all sorts of angles to get more rewards. Here are some of the plays that ConsumerAffairs has found consumers trying to make:

5/24

One gaming technique is to sign up for five credit cards in 24 months, the typical threshold for how often a consumer can apply for a credit card and how many they can have with one company, e.g. Chase. While that possibility apparently still exists, it’s probably a safe bet that the cat’s out of the proverbial bag and the credit card companies are going to be watching 5/24 like a hawk.

Grey areas

ThePointsGuy’s (TPG) reports that American Airlines is shutting down some account holders who were trying to leverage a “grey area” in the terms and conditions by opening credit card accounts using offers that were sent electronically to another member. 

“Standard Citi credit card offers restrict cardholders from earning a sign-up bonus if the potential cardholder has opened or closed an American Airlines miles-earning credit card within the past 48 months,” writes TPG’s JT Genter. 

“However, these targeted mailers didn’t have this sign-up restriction. So, travelers were using these mailers to apply for numerous credit card accounts and earn credit card sign-up bonuses without being limited by the 48-month restrictions.”

Leaked link theory

There’s also the “leaked link” theory in which sneaky consumers tweak links associated with offers originally sent to someone else, get targeted for the same offer, and open up another rewards card in their own name, their real business, or a business they crafted just for the scam.

“Some folks figured out a pattern and have thus discovered links to set-APR offers on many Chase cards,” wrote Nick Reyes at FrequentMiler. “It is important to note that these links were likely not intended to be public. There is therefore certainly some risk in applying and we recommend caution and considering the risk for yourself before applying.”

Black star offer

Another trick consumers have tried to pull that credit card companies like Chase have gotten wise to is the “black star offer.” In the “just for you” section of a consumer’s Chase account online, some may see a “black star,” business-related offer.

However, greed gets the better of some consumers in their quest for black star offers, and therein lies the rub. “Best idea is to still apply for the card you want the most first and then maybe you get lucky and can get a second card as well,” writes the DoctorOfCredit.

Playing with fire

Gaming any system can seem like fun, but it can become addictive. One enterprising consumer with the handle of Amex_Fangirl learned their lesson when Chase shut their account down, and with it, their five personal and one business cards. The user was very candid about how their luck with black star offers gave “a false sense of security, so I jumped in this time.”

One residual effect of getting your accounts shuttered for trying to beat the system can be a little hand-wringing and sweating about what the airlines or credit card companies will do in retaliation. 

“There are lawyers and someone with legal knowledge in this sub,” Amex_Fangirl wrote on Reddit. “In your opinion, how likely will AA be after us monetarily? Their T&C [terms and conditions] mentions ‘Fraud, misrepresentation, abuse or violation of applicable rules is subject to administrative and/or legal action.’ and ‘American Airlines reserves the right to take appropriate legal action to recover damages, including its attorneys’ fees incurred in prosecuting any lawsuit.’"

Words from the wise

The PointsPundit at TravelUpdate has a mantra for any consumer who would like a little extra rewards juice from their credit cards. 

“More often than not, loyalty ideally cuts both ways,” they note. “If you’re a customer who plays the long game and is in the bank’s good books, you’ll enjoy the rich rewards in the long run. However, a few handy tips might help you if you’re looking to play safe and avoid attracting the attention of fraud prevention teams.”

Here’s how PointsPundit lays out their best laid plans:

  • Move ahead at a casual pace. “Miles and points are very profitable for banks and travel companies. They aren’t going anywhere. Don’t take a crash and burn approach.”

  • Don’t mess with links that weren’t sent to you directly. “If you get a targeted offer, then by all means go for it.”

  • Be smart and look for rewards that are a good match for your travel goals. “Apply for cards that align with your travel goals. If you apply for 25 credit cards in a year or 40 in two years, will you really use all of them? Will your pace of travel keep up with the amount of miles you’re racking up? More often than not, people keep hoarding miles until a devaluation hits them eventually.

  • Stay away from “manufactured spending.” According to StudentDebtRelief, manufactured spending is “the process of buying items on credit that can be converted to cash e.g. a gift card. The cardholder then uses the cash to pay the bill on the card, which means he earns rewards without spending any money.” PointPundit says the banks are hip to this and that manufactured spending, especially in bonus categories, is aggressively monitored. “It’s your call how much (if at all any) manufactured spending you want to really generate if it entails risking a shutdown.”

“While I don’t think that the sky is falling, the miles and points game is definitely changing,” is Pundit’s warning. “Just like Amex, Chase seems to be getting more vigilant…It always helps to tread carefully and not poke the bear.

New reports are circulating that credit card companies, hotels, and airlines are going after the jugular of consumers who knowingly violate program rules i...

Article Image

Experts say spending continues to be a major source of secrecy in relationships

With Black Friday -- one of the most successful, spending-wise, in recent history -- in the rearview mirror, and the holiday season well underway, many consumers are occupied with what they’re going to gift their friends and family. 

While holiday spending can leave many consumers with higher than normal credit card bills, a new study conducted by researchers from Boston College found that shopping is one of the biggest sources of secrecy in relationships, and such trends can ultimately have an effect on retailers and romance. 

“Understanding financial infidelity is important because financial matters are one of the major sources of conflict within romantic couples and prior research has shown that keeping money-related secrets in relationships is a ‘dealbreaker,’” said researcher Hristina Nikolova. 

The effect of secret purchases

To understand how secret purchases affect couples and retailers, the researchers utilized several different components -- including bank statements, records from a couples’ money-sharing app, and data from field studies -- to create the Financial Infidelity (FI) Scale. 

Financial infidelity is any such financial behavior that one partner hides from the other, as they fear the response from their partner if he/she knew the truth. The study revealed that the effects of consumers hiding purchases from their partners is twofold -- it could put a strain on the relationship and it also affects retailers’ bottom lines. 

The researchers explained that FI scores were higher when one partner opted against joint credit cards, made the majority of their purchases in cash, or quickly got rid of receipts, among other secretive behaviors. 

These actions can ultimately affect the way consumers shop, which is why the researchers are warning retailers to adopt new marketing tactics if they want to ensure their profits don’t plummet. 

“We are entering the biggest holiday shopping season and there are very simple things that retailers can do to boost their sales, such as offering inconspicuous packaging without a brand name or the ability to pay cash,” said researcher Hristina Nikolova. “Our research suggests that these options should appeal to consumers who are prone to engage in financial infidelity. Retailers should recognize that such shoppers do exist and they will probably sneak an expensive coat or a massage amidst the gift shopping they will do.” 

Keep an open dialogue

It’s also important for consumers to know that keeping an open dialogue in their relationships is key, particularly where finances are concerned. Recent studies have shown that keeping secrets around money could be a dealbreaker in many relationships. 

“A few things that couples can do to prevent financial infidelity is to talk more, get on the same page regarding both joint and individual goals they might have, and also budget for some occasional indulgences along the way of achieving their long-term financial goals,” said Nikolova. 

With Black Friday -- one of the most successful, spending-wise, in recent history -- in the rearview mirror, and the holiday season well underway, many con...

Article Image

Sony rebrands its rewards credit cards with Comenity Bank

Sony is rebranding its two credit cards, one specifically designed for video game players. The cards will be co-branded with Comenity Bank after previously being associated with Capital One.

The two credit cards are competing in the field of rewards credit cards and are aimed at solidifying Sony customer loyalty. The Sony Card provides rewards to cardmembers when they purchase Sony products, along with rewards linked to restaurant and entertainment spending.

The PlayStation Card offers rewards for PlayStation Store purchases and Sony products, along with PlayStation digital services and mobile phone payments. Both cards are locked into the Sony Rewards loyalty program, giving customers a chance to speed up the accumulation of Sony Rewards points.

The cards are being issued through Alliance Data Systems Corporation (ADS), which specializes in data-driven marketing and loyalty solutions. ADS says the cards will feature several digital features that streamline the process of accessing and interacting with credit accounts using mobile devices.

‘Tech-forward, data-driven approach’

ADS says it will also assist Sony with its data and analytics capabilities to help grow the brand and drive sales.

"Alliance Data has proven expertise in digital customer engagement and the ability to drive loyalty and sales through a multi-channel strategy," said Steven Fuld, senior vice president of marketing at Sony. "Its tech-forward, data-driven approach aligns with our goals of reaching more customers and creating memorable experiences."

Comenity Bank says the transition from Capital One should be seamless for current cardholders.

“Your account balance will be automatically transferred to your new account,” the bank says on its website. “We will send you a billing statement that shows you how much you owe. You remain responsible for any existing balance and must pay all amounts due on your account, according to the terms of your Customer Agreement.”

The Sony Card pays 5,000 bonus points when you open and use the card within 60 days. It earns five times points on purchases of Sony products at authorized retailers as well as five times points on entertainment purchases. It pays two times points at restaurants and one point everywhere else.

The Sony PlayStation Card earns five times points at the PlayStation Store and on purchases of Sony and PlayStation products at authorized retailers. It earns three times points on mobile phone bill payments and one point on all other purchases.

Sony is rebranding its two credit cards, one specifically designed for video game players. The cards will be co-branded with Comenity Bank after previously...

Article Image

Consumers are finding more financial success with secured credit cards

KeyBank reports that nearly one-third of the consumers who signed up for its secured credit card were eligible for an unsecured card after just one year.

A secured credit card is often used by consumers with poor or no credit. They make a deposit with the lender which secures their credit line. For example, if they deposit $500, they have a $500 credit limit on the card.

KeyBank promotes it as an effective tool to not only build up a credit score but also establish good money-management habits. The lender reports that 30 percent of its secured credit card customers became eligible this month for an unsecured card. Of that number, KeyBank says 65 percent are millennials.

“Millennials, many of whom came of age during the 2008 recession, are saddled with debt and looking for ways out of it," said Mitch Kime, head of Consumer Payments in KeyBank's Enterprise Payments group. "Our Secured Credit Card helps them overcome the barriers they face to establishing a strong credit history that makes financial achievements, like renting their own apartment, a reality."

Consumer support

KeyBank says it offers support to its secured credit card customers by reviewing accounts twice a year. Customers are then offered advice on how they can better manage their credit and improve spending habits. According to the lender, young adults and recent college graduates between the ages of 21 and 25 make up the largest segment of Secured Credit Card customers. 

Selecting a secured credit card is a lot like deciding on any other type of card. It’s best to find one with no annual fee. Some secured cards even offer rewards, such as cashback on purchases. 

While the credit limits tend to be low -- after all, they’re determined by how much money you deposit as security -- that tends to be beneficial since it prevents consumers from running up large balances. In most instances, consumers using a secured card need to pay the balance in full each month to have any available credit the following month. That’s a good habit to establish.

ConsumerAffairs has researched secured credit cards and come up with this list of the best ones. 

KeyBank reports that nearly one-third of the consumers who signed up for its secured credit card were eligible for an unsecured card after just one year....

Article Image

Consumer credit default rates are rising, report finds

Consumer credit defaults, as measured by S&P Dow Jones and Experian, rose again in September for a third straight month.

The index shows consumers seemed to have the most difficulty paying their car loans and mortgages. However, the default rate on credit cards actually fell 41 basis points to 3.32 percent.

Even though the default rate on car loans and mortgages went up, the increase was slight and the total remains very low. The default rate on auto loans is only 1.05 percent, and on mortgages it’s even less -- 0.73 percent.

Credit card defaults went down even though consumers increased their debt in the second quarter of the year. Consumers began the year owing more than $1 trillion on their credit card accounts, but they managed to repay $38.2 billion collectively in the first three months of the year.

Consumer financial health

The numbers are somewhat reassuring about the financial health of the consumer. While business leaders have recently expressed concern about a slowing economy, unemployment remains low and consumers appear to be paying their bills.

Of course, economists point out that the consumer is often a lagging indicator when things turn south. In other words, consumers are often the last to feel the pain. Bloomberg economists said this week there is a 25 percent chance the economy slips into a recession next month, the highest those odds have been since April. 

JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon is more emphatic. In a conference call with reporters following the bank’s third-quarter earnings release, Dimon said there is little doubt a recession is in the future, largely due to the ongoing trade dispute with China.

But the banker said he sees no indication that consumers are under any strain, saying “the consumer is doing fine.”

Geographic disparity

The S&P Dow Jones/Experian index also pinpoints default activity geographically. In September, it found three of the five major metropolitan statistical areas ("MSAs") showed higher default rates compared to the previous month. 

Chicago led the increase in defaults, rising 14 basis points to 1.19 percent. The default rates for New York and Miami each rose two basis points to 0.96 percent and 1.30 percent, respectively. The rate for Dallas was unchanged, while Los Angeles actually recorded a decline in default rates.

Consumer credit defaults, as measured by S&P; Dow Jones and Experian, rose again in September for a third straight month.The index shows consumers seem...

Article Image

Two new rewards credit cards launch this week

The crowded rewards credit card field got even more crowded this week with two new entries -- one affiliated with Visa and the other with American Express.

Credit card issuer Credit One Bank is teaming with American Express to offer a new cash back rewards credit card. The Credit One Bank American Express Card provides unlimited 1 percent cash back rewards on every purchase, regardless of the category. It also offers return protection, travel accident insurance, and extended warranty coverages. 

"The new Credit One Bank American Express Card offers our card members more choice and value while broadening our credit card offerings overall," said Robert DeJong, CEO at Credit One Bank. "And, at the same time, we're offering customers the chance to earn more cash back rewards, on every purchase, wherever they use the card.”

The new card is Credit One Bank’s first affiliation with American Express.

Sportsman’s Warehouse Visa

Sportsman's Warehouse has launched its Explorewards Visa card in partnership with Alliance Data, which operates co-branded and private label credit programs. Cardholders can earn five points for every $1 spent in Sportsman Warehouse stores and on its website. The card awards two points per dollar spent on gasoline, home improvement, and campground purchases and one point on all other purchases.

The company says cardholders may redeem points with no minimum by using the Sportsman’s Warehouse loyalty account eGift Card process. Cardholders can earn a $50.00 Rewards Card with $500.00 in purchases outside of Sportsman's Warehouse within the first 120 days of opening their account.

"Now, customers can easily apply for our new credit card via text, online or at a local Sportsman's store, earn points fast and redeem them at any time for gift cards, to use for all of their favorite outdoor gear, apparel, accessories, and more," said Jon Barker, Sportsman's Warehouse CEO.

Choose a rewards card carefully

Personal finance advisors generally suggest consumers use a rewards credit card since it provides cash back or other benefits. However, it’s important to choose a card that rewards the kinds of purchases you make the most.

It’s also important to choose a card that has no annual fee, which could easily wipe out any rewards you might receive. An annual fee might be justified in some cases if your use of the card will generate rewards that far exceed the fee.

To help determine what credit card might be your best choice, check out ConsumerAffairs’ credit card guide.

The crowded rewards credit card field got even more crowded this week with two new entries -- one affiliated with Visa and the other with American Express....

Article Image

New York Fed injects capital into money markets to alleviate credit squeeze

On the eve of the Federal Reserve’s Open Market Committee (OMC) meeting, the central bank has been forced to make unusual injections of capital into the credit markets to meet funding needs.

The New York Federal Reserve Bank announced its intention to put another $75 billion into the financial system Wednesday, its second such move in as many days. The bank acted after interest rates on overnight repurchasing agreements, known as “repos,” surged by as much as 10 percent on Tuesday.

What it means is fairly simple: all of a sudden demand for loans has outstripped available capital in banks to make loans. Oddly, it occurred against a backdrop of low interest rates when the concern until recently had been that rates on long-term bonds were lower than those on short-term notes.

“This repo operation will be conducted with Primary Dealers for up to an aggregate amount of $75 billion,” the New York Fed said in a statement. “Securities eligible as collateral in the repo include Treasury, agency debt, and agency mortgage-backed securities.”

Keeping a key interest rate in check

Ironically, the New York Fed acted in an effort to keep the Fed’s key interest rate -- the federal funds rate -- from going higher. It’s currently floating in a range of 2 percent to 2.25 percent and the New York Fed said its action is designed to keep the rate stable.

But when the OMC meets today, Fed policymakers are fully expected to announce a quarter-point cut in the federal funds rate, perhaps making the New York Fed’s job even harder. The OMC is under intense pressure from the financial markets -- and the White House -- to lower interest rates.

The Financial Times reports that the New York Fed appears to have been successful in calming the financial markets, noting that the repo rate had settled back into its middle range by late Tuesday. A bigger question, however, is whether the sudden spike is a one-off event or a sign of bigger trouble down the road.

Mark Cabana, a rates strategist at Bank of America, told Fox Business that continued pressure on the Fed’s main interest rate would likely raise questions about the Fed’s control of the money markets. Fox reports the spike was an unusual event caused by corporations withdrawing funds to pay their third-quarter taxes on Monday.

Consumers aren’t affected - yet

It doesn’t appear that consumers are in the line of fire from this event, at least not yet. The repo purchase was designed to help major banks meet their capital needs. But left unchecked, consumers as well as businesses could have faced higher interest rates. 

Assuming it does not dissuade the Fed from its expected rate cut Wednesday then consumers should suffer no immediate negative effects.

If the Fed cuts the federal funds rate as expected, then consumers with credit card balances will see some relief. Credit card interest rates are closely tied to the Fed’s key interest rate and a reduction will likely be reflected on credit card bills.

Banks’ prime lending rates are also influenced by the federal funds rate so a reduction would make car loans and home equity lines of credit less expensive. 

On the eve of the Federal Reserve’s Open Market Committee (OMC) meeting, the central bank has been forced to make unusual injections of capital into the cr...

Article Image

Choosing your first credit card should be done with care

Picking a credit card is done too often in an off-hand manner without a whole lot of thought. Maybe a merchant offers you a discount at checkout if you apply for their credit card.

But if you are seeking your first credit card, it pays to think first about your needs. If you rarely travel, then choosing an airline rewards card with an annual fee is definitely not a good fit.

If you have little credit history, there will be many cards that simply decline your application. In that case, how do you find a lender who will not only take you on as a customer but who also offers a product that fits your needs? For answers, we turned to some credit card experts.

CreditCards.com likes the Discover It Student Cash Back card. As the name implies, it is for students who, in many cases, have never had a credit card in their name. It offers 5 percent cash back on rotating categories that change quarterly. All other categories earn 1 percent cash back on every purchase.

Unusual rewards for a student card

The card has no annual fee and wins points for its cashback rewards, which CreditCards.com says is unusual for a student card.

WalletHub has several suggestions for consumers new to credit, including the Capital One QuicksilverOne Cash Rewards card. The card makes the list because it pays 1.5 percent cash back on all purchases.

The only downside, however, is the $39 annual fee. For some, that might not make sense. But the experts at WalletHub point out that the cash rewards will pay for the annual fee if you think you’ll spend $2,600 a year on the card. The interest rate is also on the high side for consumers with spotty credit, so it’s advisable to pay the balance in full each month if you get the card.

"While there has been a lot written about credit cards that offer the best perks and bonuses, there's not as much information available for people who just want a good starter card," said Eleri Miller, Marketing Coordinator for RAVE Reviews. 

RAVE has published a list of what it sees are good starter credit cards that include the two mentioned above. It also suggests Citi Rewards Student Card pays double points at supermarkets and gas stations on the first $6,000 spent per year. It provides one point on all other purchases after that.

There is no annual fee, and it offers a 0 percent introductory interest rate for the first seven months after opening an account. But beware -- if the balance isn’t paid off at the end of seven months, the interest rate will go from 16.49 percent to 26.49 percent, depending on your creditworthiness.

For consumers with ample credit experience, check out ConsumerAffairs’ best credit card section, where you can find recommendations for cards that best suit specific needs.

Picking a credit card is done too often in an off-hand manner without a whole lot of thought. Maybe a merchant offers you a discount at checkout if you app...

Article Image

You can’t treat the Apple Card like a regular credit card

The Apple Card began open enrollment this week, with the tech giant urging its iPhone customers to begin applying for the new credit card.

But while the Apple Card works like a regular credit card, you can’t treat it like a regular credit card. 

A support note, first reported by Apple Insider, warns users not to store the card in a leather wallet. Leather, it turns out, will permanently discolor the card’s bright, white, metal finish. Don’t put it in your jeans pocket either, since coming in contact with denim will do the same thing.

In fact, it seems almost as though the Apple Card should be kept in a totally separate environment since contact with other credit cards, keys, and loose change can also damage the card.

Cleaning instructions

It’s unlikely that many consumers spend much time cleaning their other credit cards, but Apple has provided instructions for doing that to its new card.

“Gently wipe with a soft, slightly damp, lint-free microfiber cloth,” the company advises. “Moisten a soft, microfiber cloth with isopropyl alcohol and gently wipe the card. Don't use window or household cleaners, compressed air, aerosol sprays, solvents, ammonia, or abrasives to clean your titanium Apple Card.”

With this much pressure to keep the Apple Card in pristine condition, some consumers might think twice before shoving it into the slot of a nasty gas pump. And in truth, the card might not have been designed for that.

The card may actually have been designed to be linked with Apple Pay. Consumers using Apple’s payment system can simply replace the card the system currently uses with the new Apple Card. Consumers who aren’t using Apple Pay may start using it once they get the Apple Card. Carrying the card might not even be necessary.

All of this prompted tech site CCN to declare this week that the Apple Card really isn’t a credit card as much as it is a “huge marketing ploy for iPhone sales.”

The Apple Card began open enrollment this week, with the tech giant urging its iPhone customers to begin applying for the new credit card.But while the...

Article Image

The Apple Card is now open to all iPhone owners

The Apple Card, the company’s entry into the credit card market, is now open for all iPhone users. Over the last 10 days, it has only been available to select customers.

Apple says its customers can quickly apply for the new credit card through the Wallet app on iPhone and start using it right away. Apple announced the card earlier this year, partnering with Goldman Sachs, saying it wanted to help consumers better manage their money.

“We’re thrilled with the overwhelming interest in Apple Card and its positive reception,” said Jennifer Bailey, Apple’s vice president of Apple Pay. “Customers have told us they love Apple Card’s simplicity and how it gives them a better view of their spending.”

The Apple Card is like many regular credit cards. It doesn’t have an annual fee and it offers 3 percent cash back on Apple purchases and 1 percent on all other purchases. 

The card has gotten a rather lukewarm reception from personal finance experts who note that most cards now don’t charge an annual fee and offer rewards as generous or more than what the Apple Card pays.

Other cards may have better benefits

“The only people who should consider applying for the Apple Card are those who pay their bills in full every month and spend a lot via Apple Pay,” WalletHub CEO Odysseas Papadimitriou told us earlier this month. “Everyone else is better off with one of the best rewards credit cards or one of the best 0% APR credit cards.”

The Apple Card, after all, is still a credit card that charges credit card interest. When the company announced the product in the spring, it said its rates would be lower than most credit cards. They are, but not that much lower -- topping out at around 24 percent APR. The average credit card rate is around 15 percent.

Papadimitrious points out that the Apple Card doesn’t offer 0 percent introductory rates, and its lowest interest rate -- the one offered to customers with the best credit -- is 12.99 percent.

Added utility

That said, loyal Apple customers may find added utility with the card. It’s extending 3 percent Daily Cash to more merchants and apps. And from now on customers will receive 3 percent Daily Cash when they use Apple Card with Apple Pay for Uber and Uber Eats.

There could be an additional advantage. If you own an iPhone and have been turned down by other credit card companies, the Apple Card might be your best bet. CNBC reported last week that consumers with subprime credit scores are being approved for the Apple Card. 

Apple reportedly sought a banking partner willing to approve as many of its U.S.-based iPhone users as possible, within the bounds of responsible lending. One iPhone user approved for the Apple Card told the network he was “shocked” that he was approved because his credit score is 620.

The Apple Card, the company’s entry into the credit card market, is now open for all iPhone users. Over the last 10 days, it has only been available to sel...

Article Image

Navy Federal revamps its rewards credit card

The rewards credit card landscape continues to get more competitive, with lenders not only introducing new cards with lucrative benefits but updating current cards to stay ahead of rivals.

Navy Federal Credit Union has revamped its More Rewards Card from American Express, increasing existing rewards and adding new ones. The card already offers three times the points at supermarkets and gas stations. Under the refresh, restaurant purchases will go from two times the points to three times.

A point is worth one cent when you redeem for cash, travel, merchandise, or gift cards. Earning 30,000 points will translate into $300 in cash or rewards.

Under the new structure, which goes into effect in September, the card will offer a new rewards category, paying three times the points on transit expenses. That includes riding sharing, bridges, tolls and ferries, parking lots and garages, limos and taxis, bus lines, charters, tour buses, and railroads.

30,000 point sign-up bonus

New cardholders will get a 30,000 point sign-up bonus and can finance purchases at 0 percent interest for the first 12 months. There are no annual fees, foreign transaction fees, balance transfer fees, or cash advance fees.

The interest rate range also compares favorably to the recently introduced Apple Card, which will charge between 12.99 and 23.99 percent interest on balances. The Navy Federal More Rewards Card has an interest rate range of  11.90 to 18.00 percent. 

For the industry as a whole, the average credit card interest rate is around 15 percent.

Additional perks

Under the makeover, the card will carry a few additional perks. Cardholders will be able to get early access to sought-after tickets for shows, sporting events, and concerts.

Personal finance experts increasingly suggest that consumers shop carefully for a rewards credit card and use it to maximize the return, even using it to pay bills in come cases. However, it only makes sense if you pay the balance in full each month.

No matter how many points you get for the purchase, it probably won’t cover the double-digit interest charges you will incur if you add the purchase to a balance.

The rewards credit card landscape continues to get more competitive, with lenders not only introducing new cards with lucrative benefits but updating curre...

Article Image

Select Apple customers are now signing up for the Apple Card

The Apple Card, Apple’s branded credit card announced earlier this year, began to roll out this week. 

Some iPhone owners were able to apply for the card this week, and it will be open to everyone else by the end of the month. This week, consumers and financial services experts got their first look at the card’s details.

“The only people who should consider applying for the Apple Card are those who pay their bills in full every month and spend a lot via Apple Pay,” said WalletHub CEO Odysseas Papadimitriou. “Everyone else is better off with one of the best rewards credit cards or one of the best 0% APR credit cards.”

That’s because the Apple Card is still a credit card. When the company announced the product in the spring, it said its rates would be lower than most credit cards. They are, but not that much lower -- topping out at around 24 percent APR. The average credit card rate is around 15 percent.

Papadimitrious points out that the Apple Card doesn’t offer 0 percent introductory rates, and its lowest interest rate -- the one offered to customers with the best credit -- is 12.99 percent.

CNBC reports that many consumers with subprime credit scores are currently qualifying for the Apple Card. The network reports that Goldman Sachs, Apple’s partner, is bowing to pressure from Apple to approve as many of its customers as possible -- even those with less-than-stellar credit.

‘Didn’t reinvent the wheel’

"As with all Apple products, the team behind the Apple Card has created an attractive-looking product, but they didn’t reinvent the wheel when it comes to credit cards,” said Sara Rathner, credit card expert at NerdWallet. “Consumers owe it to themselves to shop around when choosing a new credit card and select one that rewards them the most where they spend most often.”

As an alternative, Rathner suggests taking a look at the Citi Double Cash rewards card, which pays 2 percent back on all purchases. Its interest rate range is not much higher than the Apple Card’s -- 16.24 percent to 26.24 percent.

Of course, as CNBC’s reporting shows, some people can qualify for the Apple Card who can’t get a card designed for people with good to excellent credit.

Apple’s rewards

Apple saves its most generous rewards for the purchase of Apple products. It will pay 3 percent cash back on any Apple transaction, including iCloud storage. It pays 2 percent on any Apple Pay transaction and 1 percent on purchases made with the physical card or virtual card number.

“Unless the bulk of your budget goes toward buying new Apple products, there are a variety of cards on the market that may be a better fit," said Rathner.

Apple says its new card has some advantages that other cards don’t have. It doesn’t charge late fees and there is no annual fee. It also waives foreign transaction fees.

The Apple Card, Apple’s branded credit card announced earlier this year, began to roll out this week. Some iPhone owners were able to apply for the car...

Article Image

Credit card interest rate cap loses support when details are known

Democratic presidential hopeful Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) has gotten a lot of attention for his proposal to wipe out all student loan debt. His proposal to cap credit card interest rates is less known but just as popular.

Sanders has proposed capping the interest rate consumers pay on credit card balances at 15 percent. The average rate on credit cards is slightly higher than that, and many cardholders pay an even higher rate, making it difficult to pay off large balances.

While consumers like the idea of a cap, a new survey from CompareCards, a division of LendingTree, finds that support goes down when consumers are told how such a cap would affect credit.

Eighty-three percent of respondents support the concept of capping credit card rates at 15 percent. But the support falls to 51 percent when they learn that the cap would make it harder to qualify for a credit card.

Unsecured loans

Lenders say credit card rates are so much higher than other types of loans because credit card debt is unsecured. If a consumer defaults on the debt, the credit card company can sue, but it has little other recourse. There is no collateral securing the loan, so lenders charge everyone a higher rate to compensate for their expected losses from consumers who don’t pay.

"Americans love the idea of a credit card rate cap,” said Matt Schulz, chief industry analyst at CompareCards. “It's one of the few things that both Republicans and Democrats agree on these days, but that love isn't unconditional." 

Schulz says the survey showed a large number of cardholders would have second thoughts about an interest rate cap if it made it harder for them to get access to credit. Even cardholders with good credit are less supportive of a cap when they learn credit card companies would likely reduce rewards and incentives if a cap is imposed.

No limits on interest

Currently, there are few limits on what interest rate credit card companies can charge. The rate for cards offered to consumers with subprime credit can be more than 30 percent. 

One credit card company recently set the rate on its card at 79.9 percent. That jaw-dropping rate was found to be legal as long as the bank disclosed the terms in accordance with the Truth in Lending Act.

Even with the knowledge that it might reduce some consumers’ access to credit, an overwhelming majority -- 77 percent -- agreed there should be stronger regulations in place to protect credit card customers.

Democratic presidential hopeful Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) has gotten a lot of attention for his proposal to wipe out all student loan debt. His proposal...

Article Image

Consumers should be cautious when looking at credit card-driven travel insurance

With dust-ups like Carnival Cruise Lines being threatened with a ban from U.S. ports and the Boeing 737 MAX grounding, consumers are starting to take a look at credit cards that come with built-in travel insurance benefits.

That sounds like a good idea in theory, “but depending on each traveler and their trip specifics, this limited coverage may be exactly what they need, or it may not provide the right benefits or coverage amounts,” Jenna Hummer, a spokesperson for Squaremouth, a travel insurance comparison site, told ConsumerAffairs.

Hummer recommends that the consumer do a little more investigating before they sign up for a new credit card for the sole purpose of a travel insurance perk. “One big concern is when travelers assume their credit card offers the trip protection they need but they do not check the coverage details in advance of their trip.”

A broken foot diving in Aruba?

Squaremouth found three situations where third-party travel insurance policies can cover costs that credit cards won’t necessarily guarantee.

At the top of Squaremouth’s warning list is the fact that most credit cards don't include medical coverage if a traveler has a medical emergency while traveling. Keyword there being “most.” If the credit card you sign up for promises that it does indeed cover travel medical benefits, check the amount. Often, the amount is limited, ranging from $2,500 to $5,000.

If medical coverage is something you want to have just in case, it might be smarter to take a look at third-party medical insurance. Those policies usually offer more comprehensive medical coverage, with benefits starting around $10,000 for Emergency Medical and $100,000 for Medical Evacuation. Third-party policies can also offer some added pluses like coverage for pre-existing conditions, dental, including chronic conditions and recent diagnoses, illnesses, or injuries.

Squaremouth’s guidance? At least $50,000 in Emergency Medical coverage and $100,000 in Medical Evacuation coverage for international travel, plus higher amounts for cruises or remote travel.

When ConsumerAffairs tested Squaremouth’s $50,000 medical coverage suggestion at travel insurer Allianz, the rate we received was $152 (for a 50-year old Alabama resident visiting Aruba over the Fourth of July) which also included trip interruption, trip cancellation, baggage loss/delay, etc.

When travel plans get off the tracks

“Many credit cards offer Trip Cancellation coverage to customers who pay for trips through their card, reimbursing travelers who are unable to take their trip as planned,” Hummer said, but with a slight “but” -- those cards usually cap coverage at a certain amount.

And, just like emergency medical, travelers who want to make sure their plane or boat gets them where they’re going, checking out third-party insurers would be smart. Typically, they cover much higher trip costs and offer reimbursements up to 100% of prepaid and non-refundable travel expenses, like airfare, hotels, and tours.

Squaremouth raises one important point about Trip Cancellation coverage: While you’d rather not have to ask the credit card company or travel insurance company for approval, unfortunately, the standard Trip Cancellation benefit typically only reimburses travelers who cancel for specific reasons, such as illness, death, severe weather, or terrorism.

The all-in-one option

Want a catch-all? While Cancel for Any Reason policies can run as much as 40 percent more, the coverage is broad and will -- at least partially -- reimburse the consumer to cancel for reasons that are not covered by the standard Trip Cancellation benefit.

With dust-ups like Carnival Cruise Lines being threatened with a ban from U.S. ports and the Boeing 737 MAX grounding, consumers are starting to take a loo...

Article Image

More consumers trying to juggle payments around a five-figure credit card balance

Consumers owe more than $1 trillion in credit card debt, but how that debt is managed can make the difference between getting ahead or living paycheck-to-paycheck.

Carrying a balance of $1,000 or less? Those payments can be manageable even with a modest income and the balance can be paid off with some sustained effort. What about $5,000? That gets a little harder.

When a credit card balance goes over $10,000, that’s when you can find yourself behind the 8 ball, depending on your income and other expenses. Assuming a 17 percent interest rate -- and the rate on many cards is higher -- the interest payments alone would be $141.66 a month, assuming you never paid anything on the principle.

Unfortunately, a growing number of consumers find themselves trying to juggle payments around a five-figure credit card balance. About one in six consumers with credit cards in the nation’s largest metro areas carry a balance of $10,000 or more, according to a new report from CompareCards.

Big spenders in Bridgeport, Conn.

According to the study Bridgeport, Conn., has the highest percentage of consumers with a $10,000 credit card balance. Researchers say most of the cities with the highest percentages of people with five-figure credit card debt are along the East Coast and West Coast. And it’s not low income households that have gotten in over their heads in plastic debt -- it's often the wealthiest cities that carry the biggest card balances.

About 23 percent of credit card holders in the Bridgeport metro area carry balances in excess of  $10,000. Nearly 2 percent of Bridgeport consumers owe more than $50,000 on their cards.

Virginia Beach is second on the list, with 20 percent of cardholders owing at least $10,000 on their cards. Washington, D.C. is third with just under 20 percent in the five-figure club. New York is fourth and Los Angeles rounds out the top five.

Less debt in the South

While the biggest borrowers tend to be on the coasts, the South has fewer credit card customers who owe $10,000 or more. In fact, five of the seven cities with the lowest percentage of cardholders with five-figure card debt were in the South.

Winston-Salem, N.C.; Greensboro, N.C.; Chattanooga; Knoxville, Tenn.; and Jackson, Miss., have high percentages of five-figure credit card debt, but none higher than 12.4 percent.

"When your credit card debt hits five figures, it's crushing, and it can consume your life. I know. I've been there," said Matt Schulz, chief industry analyst at CompareCards. "But if you're struggling with credit card debt, the worst thing you can do is nothing.”

Sometimes seeking advice from a non-profit credit counselor can be the first step toward getting out of debt. The National Foundation for Credit Counseling (NFCC) can put you in touch with a non-profit counselor in your area.

Consumers owe more than $1 trillion in credit card debt, but how that debt is managed can make the difference between getting ahead or living paycheck-to-p...

Article Image

One in five consumers don’t know if they have credit card debt

After student loan debt, credit card debt is one of the main financial anchors holding consumers back, preventing them from getting ahead.

But a new survey conducted for U.S. News and World Report shows a lot of consumers are not only unaware of how much credit card debt they owe, they don’t even know if that debt exists.

A recent report from the Federal Reserve shows credit card debt in the U.S. surpassed the $1 trillion mark for the first time in 2018. Student loan debt is only slightly larger, at $1.4 trillion.

The disturbing results of the U.S. News survey show 21 percent of consumers don’t know if they are carrying a credit card balance and 30 percent said they don’t know how much interest they pay each month.

Nearly a quarter owe more than $10,000

The survey also found that of consumers who have credit card debt, 24 percent owe more than $10,001. While 37 percent have a balance on just one credit card; 12 percent are running tabs on five or more credit cards.

If you recognize yourself among those statistics, Beverly Harzog, best-selling author, credit card expert and consumer finance analyst at U.S. News, says it’s no cause for shame. Most of us have been there at one time or another.

"When I was young, I fell into a sea of credit card debt because I was uneducated about personal finance and unaware of the high interest rates associated with credit cards," she said.

Paying down a balance might not be as daunting as it might seem. Harzog recommends tricks like transferring high interest credit card balances to a card giving you a year or more without paying interest.

Get a balance transfer card

"If you qualify, a balance transfer credit card can save you money and help you get back on track financially," she said.

As ConsumerAffairs has previously reported, a balance transfer card with a 0 percent interest rate allows you to quickly pay off a balance because the entire payment goes to pay down what’s owed. With a high-interest credit card, very little of the payment actually goes toward the debt.

The U.S. News survey uncovered some good news as well as bad news. It found that a majority of consumers -- 60 percent -- do not have any credit card debt. They pay off their balance in full each month.

But of consumers who are carrying a credit card balance, 13 percent said they have to struggle to make ends meet. Fifteen percent said their credit card debt limits their spending on other things.

After student loan debt, credit card debt is one of the main financial anchors holding consumers back, preventing them from getting ahead.But a new sur...

Article Image

Consumers who paid to lower their credit card interest rate are getting refunds

If you get a robocall promising a reduction in your credit card’s interest rate, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has a piece of advice: hang up.

The agency says it has begun distributing refunds to consumers who fell for such a pitch. The FTC joined with the Florida Attorney General’s Office in 2015 to sue Payless Solutions, accusing it of making illegal robocalls to thousands of people nationwide offering a “worthless” program to reduce credit card interest rates.

According to the complaint, the defendants told consumers they could shave at least $2,500 from their credit card bills and pay them off must faster because they would be paying a lower interest rate.

The average credit card interest rate is over 17 percent, with many cardholders paying a much higher rate. The program may have sounded very attractive to some heavily leveraged consumers, even though the company charged an upfront fee that the FTC said ranged from a low of $300 to a high of $4,999. The suit also charged the defendants with illegally charging some consumers without their consent.

Full refunds

The FTC said it is now providing full refunds to consumers charged a fee by Payless Solutions, with the average refund at about $1,000. Eligibility will be determined by the company’s records or through consumer complaints to the FTC’s Consumer Sentinel Network. Consumers who receive a refund should deposit or cash checks within 60 days, which is specified on the check.

It should be noted that the FTC never requires consumers to pay money or provide account information to cash a refund check.

While paying an upfront fee will not get you a lower interest rate there are legitimate ways to pay less each month and pay off the balance faster. The first is by transferring the balance to a card offering several months of 0 percent interest.

Considerations

There are several considerations when selecting a balance transfer card, including whether to apply for one that charges a fee to transfer the balance. Most cards charge between 3 percent and 5 percent of the balance, but a few don’t. Here is a good place to start your research.

Consumers with impaired credit might not qualify for a balance transfer card. If so, the experts at ConsumerAffairs suggest taking steps to raise your credit score. The best way to do that is to pay every bill on time, no matter what.

If one of your credit cards is nearly maxed out, work on paying down that balance first. That, too, will improve your credit score.

You’ll find other helpful advice for reducing your credit card debt here.

If you get a robocall promising a reduction in your credit card’s interest rate, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has a piece of advice: hang up.The...

Article Image

KeyBank rolls out contactless credit card

Now that consumers have gotten accustomed to inserting their embedded-chip cards into a credit card terminal instead of swiping, the next trend may be just simply tapping the card on the terminal to record a purchase.

KeyBank is launching Mastercard contactless credit and debit cards, in partnership with Mastercard and FIS. The new cards, which are now being issued to account holders, will allow consumers to make in-store purchases by just tapping the terminal screen. The transaction is encrypted to provide security.

"We know that consumers value convenience and speed, and our new contactless cards make everyday purchases quick and simple, with the confidence that transactions are secure,” said Ken Gavrity, head of KeyBank Enterprise Payments. “We're thrilled to offer our customers this easy-to-use and safe way to pay."

Built-in antenna

Contactless cards come with a different kind of chip and a near field communication (NFC) antenna, which transmits data between the card and the terminal, usually in about half the time it takes to make a purchase using cards with the EMV chips.

Sara Rathner, NerdWallet’s credit card expert, says the contactless cards are popular in Europe, but U.S. consumers and businesses have been slow to adopt them.

“KeyBank is following other major credit and debit card issuers in offering this feature,” Rathner told ConsumerAffairs. “Wells Fargo, Chase, Capital One, and American Express have all started to roll out contactless payment capabilities on their products in the past few years. As more U.S. merchants update their point-of-sale hardware to accept contactless payments, consumers will adopt this faster way to pay in greater numbers.”

While consumers may worry about the security of contactless payments, a transaction is secured by using a one-time code rather than your personal information.

“While there’s always a risk of your credit or debit card being compromised, you have recourse if you report fraudulent charges to the issuer as soon as possible,” Rathner said.

According to CreditCards.com, the U.S. adoption of the EMV chip card as standard may pave the way to wider use of contactless cards. That’s because many of the new terminals that accept chip cards also work for contactless cards.

Digital wallets also use similar technology. Once you load your payment information into a digital wallet app, you can pay for purchases by holding your smartphone next to the credit card terminal. An estimated 30 million retailers are equipped to accept digital wallet payments.

Now that consumers have gotten accustomed to inserting their embedded-chip cards into a credit card terminal instead of swiping, the next trend may be just...

Article Image

Survey finds consumers still clinging to cash

Consumers have a growing number of options to cash when it comes to spending money.

In addition to countless credit cards, there are mobile wallets that can allow you to pay via your phone. A debit card lets you spend money from your bank account with just a swipe. And of course, there’s the old fashioned credit card.

So is the greenback an endangered species? The latest research from Origin, Hill Holliday’s independent research arm, suggests most consumers aren’t ready to give up cash completely. The study tried to measure consumers’ attitudes about cash and other forms of payment and examined the attitudes that both consumers and businesses have about cash versus plastic and digital.

The younger consumers are, the more likely they are to be using a mobile wallet and app-based payments such as Apple Pay or Venmo; however, they aren’t ready to go all in. Businesses appear to prefer cash to accepting mobile payments due to costs, tech adoption, and perceived lack of interest among consumers.

Most still carry cash

The survey found that 76 percent of consumers still carry some cash, even if they mostly use other methods to pay for things. Fifty-five percent said they “hated” the idea of completely abandoning cash.

So far, mobile wallets are pretty much a millennial thing. Forty-five percent of consumers over 40 have never made a mobile payment, while 22 percent of those under 40 use it daily. But 58 percent of those using mobile payments only started in the last year.

Last week The Wall Street Journal reported Venmo, an app originally designed as a way to transfer money between family and friends, is rolling out a branded credit card in a bid to attract users who are not quite ready to try a digital wallet.

Sara Rathner, a credit card analyst at NerdWallet, says the card appears to be targeting a young group of consumers that already relies heavily on the Venmo app.

“One benefit I see the card providing is waiving the 3 percent fee to use it to transfer money, but that would be a small perk compared to what other cards offer,” Rathner said in an email to ConsumerAffairs. “There are so many rewards cards on the market with massive sign-up bonuses and generous cashback rates at places where younger consumers spend the most, like restaurants.”

Tough business

Rathner said Venmo may have the same experience as Apple when it announced its credit card. She said the announcement was mostly met with yawns.

“A strong brand is good to have, but consumers are going to vote with their wallets for the card that earns them the most rewards," she said.

In a 2018 survey conducted for the Pew Research Center roughly three-in-ten adults in the U.S. said they made no purchases using physical currency during a typical week -- that’s up from 24 percent in 2015.

As part of its research, Hill Holliday conducted a deprivation study with 10 adults, who agreed to “go cashless” for a week and record their experiences. According to the researchers, every participant cheated.

Consumers have a growing number of options to cash when it comes to spending money.In addition to countless credit cards, there are mobile wallets that...

Article Image

Chase Freedom Card sweetens the rewards for new customers

As competition in the credit card industry increases, so do the benefits for consumers. The Chase Freedom Card is the latest to ratchet up rewards for cardholders.

The card is doubling its cash back rewards for new account holders from 1.5 percent to 3 percent on up to $20,000 in purchases during the first year. That potentially adds up to an extra $300 in cash back.

After the first year, the cash back rewards rate returns to 1.5 percent on all purchases.

“Freedom Unlimited’s 3 percent cash back offer provides new cardmembers with the opportunity to make the most of their everyday spending and keep them 'always earning,'” said BJ Mahoney, general manager of Chase Freedom. “We are excited to reward new customers even more for their purchases.”

Flexibility

With the Chase Freedom Card, users can get cash back or redeem their points for travel, gift cards, Apple products, and even products bought on Amazon.

The Chase Freedom Card carries no annual fee and offers 0 percent financing for 15 months when you transfer an existing balance from another card. After that, the rate can vary between 17.24 percent and 25.99 percent. There is a 3 percent balance transfer fee, so moving a large balance can be pricey.

The Freedom Card offers other perks, such as a $150 cash bonus if you spend $500 on purchases in the first three months the account is open. The card pays 5 percent cash back on up to $1,500 in combined purchases in bonus categories that you choose.

Try to avoid annual fees

Lenders continue to add benefits as consumers flock to rewards credit cards and the competition to sign new accounts heats up. But it is important to keep in mind that many of these premium cards carry annual fees -- some of them $400 or more.

Paying an annual fee will wipe out much of your cash rewards, depending on how you use the card. There are plenty of rewards cards, like the Chase Freedom Card, that do not charge an annual fee.

As we have pointed out in the past, sometimes the best rewards credit card is a balance transfer card. That’s especially true if you have a large balance of $5,000 or more. The money you save in interest charges will probably far exceed what you will earn in cash back rewards.

When selecting a balance transfer, look for one that does not charge a balance transfer fee. It may be a better choice, even if the interest-free period is shorter.

ConsumerAffairs offers other tips for selecting the right credit card here.

As competition in the credit card industry increases, so do the benefits for consumers. The Chase Freedom Card is the latest to ratchet up rewards for card...

Article Image

Experian settles claims over inaccurate credit reports

As part of a settlement approved this week by the court, some consumers will be eligible for two years of free credit monitoring from Experian.

The settlement covers three lawsuits filed in federal court claiming that some consumers’ credit reports contained inaccurate tax liens or civil judgments. The suits claimed affected consumers suffered lower credit scores and may have been denied credit, or paid higher costs as a result.

As part of the settlement, Experian has set up mediation and arbitration programs for affected consumers. Those who meet certain requirements may be eligible to mediate claims for money through these programs, though payment is not guaranteed. These benefits are available until August 22, 2020.

Consumers are eligible to take part in the settlement if they requested their credit report from Experian between January 15, 2011 and September 21, 2018 and it included an incorrect public record such as a bankruptcy, judgment, or tax lien.

Consumers are also eligible if Experian sent their credit report to a third party between January 15, 2014 and September 21, 2018 and the report contained inaccurate information.

Experian has established this website to guide consumers who may be eligible for the benefits.

As part of a settlement approved this week by the court, some consumers will be eligible for two years of free credit monitoring from Experian.The sett...

Article Image

Apple launches a new, security-driven credit card

Not one to be left out of the all-things-for-all-people game, Apple threw a giant welcoming party on Monday for its new video streaming service -- “TV+” -- and its new credit card, “Apple Card.”

Apple’s foray into fintech is a giant step for the company, but not a new one. Its “Apple Pay” is in its fourth year as a mobile payment and digital wallet service, and according to Apple CEO Tim Cook, Apple Pay transactions soared to more than 1 billion in 2018. If you’re doing the math, that’s about 11 million per day -- thought to be more than both Square and PayPal’s mobile transactions.

The big questions

Just looking at its history, let alone the numbers, it’s tough to call Apple’s move into the credit card world a bad one. However, within hours after the company’s announcement, tech and financial sages came out of the woodwork to weigh in with their own take.

Here’s what ConsumerAffairs found:

Apple’s pitch

As far as the upsides to Apple Card, the company has three points it wants the consumer to take away:

  1. “The card lives on your iPhone, in the Wallet app. And that makes all kinds of new things possible.

  2. When you buy something using Apple Card, you get a percentage of your purchase back in Daily Cash. Not a month from now, but every day. There’s no limit to how much you can get. And it goes right onto your Apple Cash card, so you can use it just like cash.

  3. Apple Card doesn’t have any fees. No annual, cash‑advance, over-the-limit, or late fees.”

Security

For one, TechCrunch’s security editor, Zach Whittaker, gave the card a nice fistbump.

“Chief among the benefits is a range of security and privacy features, which Apple says — unlike traditional credit card providers — the company doesn’t know where a customer shopped, what they bought or how much they paid. But its one feature — a one-time unique dynamic security code — will make it nearly impossible for anyone to use the credit card to make fraudulent purchases,” Whittaker said.

Charting new waters

Apple isn’t alone in this venture; it has Mastercard on its side to help guide it through processes that it may be new to.

In an interview with Mastercard’s Jorn Lambert, EVP of digital solutions, PYMTS learned that “the embrace of the Apple Card may span both the virtual and physical offerings, and...will likely prove useful in restaurants or bars where Apple Pay is not currently a payment option. The move from plastic to ‘digital first’ to ‘digital only’ may take several years.”

But Apple Card’s joint physical and digital card offerings may be what marks a “turning point.”

Need or want?

Credit card companies -- short of MasterCard, which is Apple’s partner in this deal -- won’t be taking this move lying down. It’s a safe bet that credit card companies around the world are getting geared up with similar products that will offer consumers more choices.

“They [Apple] are really lengthening this gap that other competitors can come into,” said credit card vlogger Brian Jung. “I believe from a business standpoint, credit cards are an excellent move, but as a credit card channel, I can't recommend this credit card to a lot of my people unless you guys are in it for the flex value. The only reason I would say to get this card now, in my opinion, it really is kind of a gimmick card because it is just for the name brand.”

It’s still a credit card

Dovetailing Jung’s point-of-view, iMore’s Rene Ritchie weighed in with this slant:

“It’s still a credit card, and that means the interest is still real, and the business model is still awful. The entire credit card industry is still absolutely and unabashedly evil. Apple's doing some good stuff to mitigate it. They're keeping [interest rates] low. They're suggesting ways to pay debt off faster, including bi-weekly and weekly payments. They're showing you how much interest you'll be paying if you choose different payment options. They're offering payment plan options to help you get debt free.”

“But the entire credit card system is still absolutely and unabashedly evil. If Apple has to get into bed with it, I'd much rather see something like American Express, the classic version, where you can't carry a balance and so there's no usurious interest rates and no debt-built business. Which, frankly, should be absolutely illegal anyway.”

The verdict?

It’s really too early to tell. The features are inviting, but like we said -- other credit card companies are likely to follow suit.

On the fintech end, it’ll be no stroll in the park for Apple, either. It has Google’s Google Pay service to contend with. Facebook’s WhatsApp is said to be rolling out a payment feature, too. And while Apple has its iPhone to carry some of Apple Card’s load via Apple Pay, Android Pay and Samsung Pay have a larger footprint around the world.

Not one to be left out of the all-things-for-all-people game, Apple threw a giant welcoming party on Monday for its new video streaming service -- “TV+” --...

Article Image

TD Bank survey finds millennials lack credit knowledge

There’s a disconnect when it comes to millennials and credit. They’re the generation least likely to carry cash, but a new survey by TD Bank shows they are also the most likely to fall short when it comes to building healthy credit habits.

For example, millennials are big believers in plastic, but 23 percent don’t have a credit card. And while they tend not to like cash, 26 percent actually prefer to spend cash when they travel.

Other statistics stick out. Personal finance experts say consumers should use 30 percent or less of their credit limit. Half of millennials have tapped between 31 percent and 90 percent of their available credit.

Perhaps more disturbing, 32 percent of millennials routinely carry a credit card balance. They rarely pay off their balance in full, potentially damaging their credit health and increasing their monthly costs in a rising rate environment, as the one consumers found themselves in last year.

What’s my score?

About a quarter of millennials are unaware of their credit score, a real disadvantage when applying for everything from credit cards to car loans. Consumers with high credit scores deserve -- and should demand -- lower interest rates.

"The data is a bit concerning,” said Mike Kinane, who is head of US Bankcard at TD Bank. “It shows that a significant knowledge gap exists for millennials when it comes to credit, especially compared to prior generations."   

Kinane says even millennials who use cash should develop their financial knowledge and habits since it will no doubt prove useful in the future.

Advice from Suze

Money management guru Suze Orman consistently counsels consumers to get rid of their credit card debt, even to the point of tapping into savings to do so. After all, she points out, you’re earning 1 percent on your savings but probably paying 17 percent or more on your credit card balance.

If you lack savings but have an excellent credit score, Orman also suggests a balance transfer card with at least a year of zero percent interest. ConsumerAffairs rates the best balance transfer cards here.

The TD Bank survey also suggests millennials aren’t quite as savvy as older generations when it comes to playing the credit card rewards game. They do a good job of earning rewards with their purchases, but 30 percent have put off using those rewards to the point where they have expired.

According to the survey, millennials spend $2,447 a year on dining, more than Gen-X ‘s $1,923  and Baby Boomers’ $1,486. Using a credit card with 2 percent cash back on dining could net nearly $50 in rewards each year. That could pay for over two weeks of coffee or almost four months of a Netflix subscription.

There’s a disconnect when it comes to millennials and credit. They’re the generation least likely to carry cash, but a new survey by TD Bank shows they are...

Article Image

American credit card debt reaches a record $1 trillion

We’ve reached another milestone. Americans owe over $4 trillion worth of consumer debt, a record number, according to new data released by the Federal Reserve.

At least we have credit cards. The Federal Reserve found that credit card debt alone surpassed $1 trillion for the first time.

Data released by consumer financing sites confirm that it’s past time to start paying off our credit cards. The firm Experian reports that the average American has a credit card balance of $4,293. A recent WalletHub survey found that more than 1 in 3 people are afraid of maxing out their credit cards when making a purchase over $100.

The findings come at a time when credit card interest is rising, now averaging 17.41 percent.

Another major source of consumer debt is higher education. Student loan debt tripled in the last decade alone and is now worth $1.5 trillion.

Still, financial experts don’t seem particularly worried about American consumer debt, or debt that doesn’t include mortgages. The amount remains “pretty manageable overall," one financial expert told CNBC.

We’ve reached another milestone. Americans owe over $4 trillion worth of consumer debt, a record number, according to new data released by the Federal Rese...

Article Image

Apple and Goldman Sachs may be launching a credit card

A new credit card provided by Goldman Sachs and Apple is reportedly in the planning stages. A report in The Wall Street Journal cites people involved in the project who say it will be a Mastercard product and use elements of Apple’s digital wallet, Apple Pay.

The sources say the new card is expected to launch later in 2019 around the time Apple upgrades the iPhone. While industry analysts say the card should be a winner for both companies, Arielle O’Shea, NerdWallet personal finance expert, says it could also be good for consumers.

“If reports are true and the card ends up offering 2 percent back on all purchases, it could directly compete with other top cash back cards on the market,” she told ConsumerAffairs.com.

O’Shea says Goldman Sachs would like to engage with millennials, and she sees an Apple credit card as an effective way to bond with this next generation of bank customers.

“The bank is likely hoping to piggyback on Apple's loyal following to convert users of the credit card to long-term Marcus banking customers that turn to the bank for other financial products,” O’Shea said.

Slow to adopt Apple pay

Apple Pay is widely used around the world, but the adoption rate among retailers lags far behind credit cards. The new Apple card is expected to go head-to-head with Chase’s Sapphire Preferred and Sapphire Reserve travel cards, which are already popular with millennial consumers

“Given that millennials tend to most value experiences and travel, they may continue to be attracted to travel rewards cards despite Apple's powerful brand,” O’Shea said. “Even the biggest Apple fans shouldn't blindly turn to this card: It's important to compare annual fees and features when shopping for a new card, and make sure it fits your spending habits.”

The Journal Report makes clear that consumers who are already using Apple Pay may stand to benefit the most. Cardholders may get some special features in Apple Pay such as setting a budget and managing payments.

A new credit card provided by Goldman Sachs and Apple is reportedly in the planning stages. A report in The Wall Street Journal cites people involved in th...

Article Image

Navy Federal revamps its credit card member rewards program

In the intense competition for credit card customers, Navy Federal Credit Union has revamped its member rewards program by significantly increasing the rewards it offers members.

The credit union has changed the name of its Member Mall to Navy Federal Member Deals. Members who go to the new online portal will be able to shop online at over 900 major retailers using a Navy Federal card. By doing so, they can earn up to 15 times the points or choose to receive 15 percent cash back on their purchases.

Members using the portal for Valentine’s gifts can get increased rewards through the program from FTD and Godiva, experiential gifts with offers from outlets like LivingSocial, or even book a  winter vacation getaway through Expedia or Hotels.com. The move ups the ante in the credit card sweepstakes.

"At Navy Federal, we want our cardholders to take full advantage of the opportunities to earn even more rewards - and our recently revamped Member Deals is a perfect example,” Justin Zeidman, head of credit card products at Navy Federal, told ConsumerAffairs. “Credit card points and cash back can translate into hundreds of dollars back in our members' pockets.”

The retailers in the program include Walmart, Best Buy, Staples, Macy’s, and the Home Depot. If you went to one of these stores or accessed it online without going through the members portal, you’d still save money, just not as much.

More cash back

For example, spending $400 using the Navy Federal cashRewards card by going directly to a  participating retailer would yield $6 cash back, nothing to sneeze at. However, spending that same $400 at one of these retailers by accessing it through the Member Deals portal would get you $26 cash back.

If you have a Navy Federal card that rewards you with points, the difference is just as striking. The Visa Signature Flagship Rewards card would give you 800 points on a normal $400 purchase. But spending that same money through the Member Deals portal lets you rack up 2,800 points.

Participating retailers offer attractive deals since Navy Federal is funneling customers their way. Some even offer extra rewards, such as Verizon--  which has increased the points for adding a new line -- and Barneys New York, which has tripled its points per dollar.

Choosing a rewards card

Rewards credit cards have become increasingly popular in recent years as lenders have become more generous with the rewards they offer. Before applying, however, consider how you will use the card and what kind of rewards best suit your lifestyle.

Travel cards with the most generous rewards usually charge an annual fee. Carefully consider whether the rewards you stand to earn will more than pay for the fee. There are plenty of rewards cards that don’t charge an annual fee.

In the intense competition for credit card customers, Navy Federal Credit Union has revamped its member rewards program by significantly increasing the rew...

Article Image

New debit card allows consumers to spend cryptocurrency

Despite significant losses over the last 12 months, cryptocurrencies remain popular with some consumers. But how do you spend them? It just got a little easier.

Ternio, a technology firm specializing in blockchain, has introduced BlockCard, a debit card that enables the account holder to spend their cryptocurrency as though it were dollars. The company says it can be used online or at point-of-sale locations in brick and mortar retail locations, as long as the business accepts credit cards.

To start, the BlockCard will allow you to spend Bitcoin, Ethereum, Stellar Lumens, and Ternio. Consumers who own any of those currencies may deposit them to their BlockCard account. The company says it plans to add additional currencies later in the year.

“Ternio’s goal is to accelerate the use of blockchain and cryptocurrency into everyday life,” said Ian Kane, chief operating officer and founder of Ternio. “BlockCard enables the card holder to gain real utility from their cryptocurrency and removes the notion that crypto is only a speculative asset.”

First to support multiple currencies

BlockCard isn’t the only plastic to support a cryptocurrency, but the company said it is the first to support multiple currencies. It says it is the only card that allows real-time cryptocurrency spending by processing transactions using a crypto exchange.

“We want to give consumers the option on which digital asset they use to fund their BlockCard account,” said Daniel Gouldman, CEO and co-founder of the company. “Card holders decide if they want to buy a bagel with their Bitcoin or a latte with their Stellar Lumens. Most importantly, these transactions occur on digital asset exchanges, which helps to propel the crypto community.”

Ternio said it registered more than 1,000 people during the card’s soft launch. People interested in applying for a card can do so here.

What’s ahead?

Consumers who purchased Bitcoin and other digital currencies early in 2017 saw the value of their holdings surge, but 2018 was a different story, with Bitcoin down about 75 percent from its highs.

What does 2019 hold in store? Bitcoin and other currencies have begun the year with sharp  gains, but they still have a long way to go to make up for their losses. According to NewsBTC.com, a publication covering the crypto markets, Bitcoin remains in a bearish trend, unable to break above the $4,000 level.

Its value at the end of 2017 was more than $14,000.

Despite significant losses over the last 12 months, cryptocurrencies remain popular with some consumers. But how do you spend them? It just got a little ea...

Article Image

How to get the most out of a balance transfer credit card

Consumers struggling to pay off credit card debt would be wise to consider a balance transfer credit card in 2019, but picking the right one and using it effectively is key to making it pay off.

CompareCards, a division of LendingTree, has studied the terms and conditions of more than 160 balance transfer cards and found that there are still plenty of zero percent introductory rate options. But it’s important to read the fine print and use the cards to your full advantage.

The study found that 41 percent of consumers have applied for a balance transfer card in the past, but 40 percent of them have failed to pay off the entire balance during the zero percent introductory period. After the introductory period, the interest rate often adjusts to one that is higher than the national average.

The advantage of zero percent, of course, is the entire payment goes to pay down the balance. If you have been paying $200 a month on your old card, chances are most of that amount goes to pay interest. Paying $200 for 15 months with no interest charges will reduce a balance by $3,000.

Length of introductory period vs. balance transfer fee

The study points out the need to carefully choose a balance transfer card. The length of the zero percent introductory period is an important factor, but so is the balance transfer fee most cards assess. It is a fee based on the amount of money being transferred, and it can be hefty -- especially on large balances.

Most cards charge at least 3 percent of the transferred balance, but some charge as much as 5 percent. Even at 3 percent, transferring $10,000 results in an upfront fee of $300. The study shows that only one in six consumers who transferred a balance in the past were able to avoid the balance transfer fee.

Matt Schulz, chief industry analyst at CompareCards, says consumers can achieve some real savings with a balance transfer card as long as they understand the fees, deadlines, and other quirks that can come with this tool.

“Don’t wait, though. Credit card interest rates continue to rise and as they do it is likely these offers will get less and less attractive,” Schulz said.

Here are three options

The Chase Slate balance transfer card remains an attractive option for its combination of no transfer fee and fairly long introductory period. Consumers get 15 months of zero percent interest.

The Amex Everyday Credit Card from American Express also offers 15 months of interest-free payments with no balance transfer fee.

The Citi Simplicity Card offers 21 months at zero percent interest, but that extra six months of interest-free payments come at a hefty price. There is a balance transfer fee of either $5 or 5 percent of the transferred balance, whichever is greater.

Consumers struggling to pay off credit card debt would be wise to consider a balance transfer credit card in 2019, but picking the right one and using it e...

Article Image

Experian says it can help consumers instantly raise their credit scores

Experian has launched an initiative that it says will help many consumers instantly raise their credit score. It’s called “Experian Boost,” and the credit bureau says it will significantly influence how consumers get access to credit.

There are several ways consumers can raise their credit scores. First and foremost, they should pay all of their bills on time, but some bills count more than others.

For example, if you own a home and pay a mortgage, the mortgage lender reports your payment history to the credit bureaus. But if you rent your home, it’s likely you don’t get a similar credit from paying your rent on time.

Experian says consumers who sign up for Experian Boost will be asked to grant the platform access to their online bank accounts used to pay their bills. Specifically, Boost will look for timely payments on utility and telephone bills, which are currently not included in most credit score formulas.

Recalculated FICO score

The consumer is then asked to verify the data and confirm they want it included in their Experian credit file. After that, Experian delivers a recalculated FICO score.

"Globally, we are constantly innovating and leveraging technology to find new ways to help consumers gain access to quality credit while promoting fair and responsible lending," said Experian Global CEO Brian Cassin. "We are committed to financial inclusion, and Experian Boost is the latest example of our efforts to increase consumer awareness of credit's impact and value while giving them greater control."

Experian said there is no charge to use the Experian Boost platform. Admittedly, it will help some consumers more than others.

The company says consumers with lower scores -- 580 to 669 -- will see the most potential improvement. Based on an early analysis, the company says two out of three credit scores improved when utility and phone bills were included.

Helps those with little credit history

Furthermore, 10 percent of consumers with “thin” credit files -- meaning they haven’t had much access to credit -- became “scorable” for the first time. Seventy-five percent of consumers with a score below 680 experienced an improvement in their credit score.

The improvement for consumers in this score range could be valuable since the rise in score could potentially give them credit options other than expensive subprime loans. The Credit Builders Alliance estimates that a subprime credit score will cost a consumer an additional $200,000 over their lifetime.

For example, having a 720 FICO score instead of 500 will save you $4,020 on a $10,000, 5-year auto loan – lowering the payment by $67 a month.

Experian has provided this link for consumers who want to sign up for Experian Boost or to get more information.

Experian has launched an initiative that it says will help many consumers instantly raise their credit score. It’s called “Experian Boost,” and the credit...

Article Image

Class action lawsuit claims Bank of America and JPMorgan Chase sold personal consumer info

Hand-wringing is the exercise du jour at Bank of America (BOA) and JPMorgan Chase thanks to a group of bank customers filing a class action lawsuit which claims the two banking giants sold the personal information customers gave as a part of acquiring a credit card.

And, as most consumers know, when you jump through the hoops of a credit card application, there’s virtually no personal data that’s kept out of the loop. Names, addresses, Social Security numbers, addresses, credit history, and bank accounts all come into play.

The capper on the banks’ personal data practice in this situation is that the credit card holders have to continue to provide this information to the financial institutions as long as they use their credit cards, according to the lawsuit.

“Plaintiffs’ [personal financial information] is valuable to Defendants,” contends the plaintiffs.

“They regularly enter into agreements with third parties to provide this [PFI: personal financial information] in exchange for money and other financial benefit. Under these agreements, Defendants have profited greatly from the sale of Plaintiffs’ PFI to third parties.”

The plaintiffs feel that their personal profile is of value to the banks and that the banks have profited off that data without the user’s permission without sharing part of that profit with the credit card holder.

“Plaintiffs have a property interest in their own PFI regardless of what Defendants may do to or with it once Defendants have it in their possession, however it may be de-identified and/or aggregated for sale,” alleges the suit.

Haven’t the banks learned their lesson yet?

JPMorgan Chase & Co. paid credit card customers $100 million as part of a class action lawsuit settlement, which resolved allegations that it improperly increased minimum payments as a means to generate higher fees, according to TopClassActions.

And, in an ironic twist of misuse of consumer data, JPMorgan Chase was fined $4.6 million in 2017 for not guaranteeing accuracy of consumer information.

Bank of America has also experienced its fair share of trips to the courthouse. Just last year, the bank paid $1.9 million to settle a consumer protection lawsuit alleging that it did not disclose that phone calls with consumers were being recorded.

BOA was also part of the largest civil fine in American history when it agreed to pay a $16 billion fine for mortgage fraud.

Hand-wringing is the exercise du jour at Bank of America (BOA) and JPMorgan Chase thanks to a group of bank customers filing a class action lawsuit which c...

Article Image

Should you let your child use your credit card?

Children are getting their own credit cards at an earlier age, which if properly supervised and monitored, can be a good way to teach them proper money-management skills.

But far more parents are allowing their children to use their credit cards, which may not be such a wise decision.

A survey by CompareCards, a subsidiary of LendingTree, found 52 percent of parents have allowed their children under 18 to use their credit cards to make online purchases. Not surprisingly, 48 percent of the parents who did that now say they regret doing it.

"The survey found that Americans have been burned by the volatile mixture of kids and credit cards," said Matt Schulz, CompareCards' chief industry analyst. "While most Americans feel that you should wait until you're in your 20s to get your first credit card, they also think that it's OK to let your child use your credit or debit card to make online purchases, even though it often doesn't go well."

Blurred boundaries

One problem with the practice is that boundaries can sometimes blur in the mind of the child. Of the parents who allowed their children to access their credit card, 29 percent said the child had made at least one unauthorized purchase.

Another problem is the fact the child never sees the bill – the consequences of the purchase. All they know is they typed in some credit card information and got what they wanted. Maybe they reimbursed Mom and Dad later, but the connection between the credit card purchase and the payment isn't quite as strong.

The survey found that parents think the best age for a child to get a credit card is 21, but some personal finance advisors think that's a little late.

Authorized user on parents’ account

Legally you must be at least 18 to open a credit card account in your name, but a growing number of parents are making their children authorized users on one of their accounts. T. Rowe Price's Parents, Kids, and Money Survey found that 18 percent of children age eight to 14 carry a credit card on one of their parents' accounts.

Before taking that step, however, there are some things to consider. The child should have a source of income to pay for the purchases, either an after-school job or an allowance.

Secondly, children should be held accountable for their spending. While they will not receive separate bills, the parents' credit card bill will break down spending. Children need to be held accountable every time the bill arrives. If they charge things for which they can't pay, parents need to hold onto the card until they can pay it back.

If a child is practically an adult when they get their first credit card, often when going off to college, it is often too late to develop good money-management habits.

Children are getting their own credit cards at an earlier age, which if properly supervised and monitored, can be a good way to teach them proper money-man...

Article Image

Mastercard cardholder signatures now optional on cards and receipts

The lightning-fast pace of technology has dug deeper into consumers’ billfolds. Mastercard announced on Friday that signatures will soon be optional for all cardholders, not only on the card but on receipts, as well. Mastercard issuers will start distributing the signature panel-less cards in April, 2019.

Having the luxury of get-it-and-go without having to sign anything offers consumers the ability to save time and deal with a little less hassle at the tail end of a transaction for those who “tap-and-pay.”

Mastercard didn’t come to this change quickly. In a study of 1,200+ credit card users, only 40 percent said they had put their John Hancock on the back of their cards, and one-third of those who haven’t signed said they didn’t really see any value in doing it anyway.

“With modern, advanced forms of authentication now available, removing the requirement for signature capture at the point of sale and now signature panels on Mastercard cards is an important step in support of our digital evolution,” said Linda Kirkpatrick, executive vice president, U.S. Merchants and Acceptance, Mastercard. “Issuers, merchants and cardholders will benefit from this change as faster, safer options improve satisfaction and increase sales.”

Mastercard said the move to signature-less was also delayed until cards embedded with chips became common.

Any security risk?

In Mastercard’s research, most of the survey takers didn’t believe that leaving their signature off posed a risk, and two-thirds of the respondents said they preferred biometrics over the standard signatures, PIN numbers, and passwords when paying with their card.

“We see this as a win for all. The investments we’ve made in technology like artificial intelligence and biometrics are what’s powering this next step,” said Ajay Bhalla, president of Mastercard’s cyber and intelligence solutions.

“We believe our merchant and issuing partners everywhere will embrace the ability to deliver a simpler checkout experience while maintaining the highest levels of security.”

To give consumers an extra ounce of confidence in Mastercard’s technology move, the company says that users will remain protected against fraud via Mastercard Zero Liability coverage. However, knowing the caveats of the policy will be important to ensure that there are no gaps.

If a consumer’s card ever gets compromised, the company’s Zero Liability policy states that the card user will not be held responsible for unauthorized transactions only if:

  • The user has used reasonable care in protecting their card from loss or theft; and

  • The user promptly reports loss or theft to their financial institution.

Verifi, an ecommerce solution provider, tells ConsumerAffairs that adding three-factor authentication through biometrics will help ensure that consumers’ identities are protected. However, there are drawbacks to consider.

“The plus for biometrics is that they cannot easily be counterfeited as they are unique to the customer and they are easily accessible for the user,” a company representative said. “On the flip side, this type of authentication is less convenient for consumers and usually requires a longer time commitment for the checkout process as the merchant is requiring an additional factor of authentication.”

The lightning-fast pace of technology has dug deeper into consumers’ billfolds. Mastercard announced on Friday that signatures will soon be optional for al...

Article Image

American Express’ Gold card gets a complete makeover

American Express (Amex) is saying goodbye to its “Premier Rewards Gold Card” and hello to the latest darling in the metal card design, the “American Express Gold Card.”

The new card was conceived primarily for consumers who love -- and spend money on -- travel and food.

“We designed the new Gold Card to reward our Card Members’ growing appetites for dining out, eating in and traveling near and far,” said Rachel Stocks, American Express’ executive vice president of Global Premium Products & Benefits.

“Our Card Members increasingly want to experience new cuisines and explore new places, so when creating this new product, we focused on adding value in these areas, like the new dining credit and 4X points accelerators at U.S. restaurants and supermarkets. This is just another way that we strive to have our customers’ backs during the moments they value most.”

The biggest casualty in the card’s rehab is the rewards that were previously given for gasoline purchases. The updated Gold Card is saying “so long” to those points effective October 4, 2019.

All-you-can-eat rewards points

Effective immediately, Gold Card Members will get twice the rewards points they do now, whether they’re eating out at a restaurant or buying foodstuffs at their local grocer. The new Gold Card now offers 4X (four times) the points at U.S. Restaurants, as well as U.S. supermarkets (on the first $25,000 in annual purchases). The buying habits of the growing millennial market might have played a hand in American Express’ refocus.

“While it’s becoming common for higher-end travel cards to come with some form of statement credit for travel purchases, this is the first time we’ve seen a dining credit,” said John Ganotis, Founder of CreditCardInsider.com, in comments to ConsumerAffairs.

The new Gold Card also throws in a new $120 annual dining credit which gifts its members up to $10 per month in statement credits when they use their card at participating Shake Shack locations, The Cheesecake Factory, Ruth’s Chris Steak House, and Grubhub/Seamless.

Like to travel?

In addition to Amex’s new dining and food bonuses, the Gold Card is upping the ante for travel lovers. Those fringe benefits include:

  • 3X Membership Rewards points on flights booked directly with airlines and amextravel.com;

  • $100 airline fee credit: up to $100 in statement credits per year for incidental expenses like baggage fees at one selected airline;

  • The Hotel Collection: Gold Card Members get a $75 hotel credit on qualifying charges, plus a room upgrade upon check-in, when available, when they book a stay of at least two consecutive nights at hotels in the collection;

  • Personalized Travel Service: provides access to a team of Travel Professionals who can help with travel bookings and vacation packages across air, hotels, transportation, cruise and tour; and

  • Gratis membership to The Travel Collection by Travel Leaders Group where cardholders can pick up additional discounts and amenities when booking their travel.

The perks are nice, but they’ll cost you

The old Premier Reward Gold Card’s annual fee was $195 and, if that was a little too much to swing, hang on to your hat.

The refreshed Gold Card will cost you an annual fee of $250. The new fee will go into effect for current Premier Rewards Gold Card Members starting April 1, 2019, the card’s annual account renewal date.

American Express (Amex) is saying goodbye to its “Premier Rewards Gold Card” and hello to the latest darling in the metal card design, the “American Expres...

Article Image

Target debit cardholders are seeing ‘red’

Like most retailers, Target offers holders of their Red credit card special deals from time to time, such as the retailer’s current promotion of 5 percent off when the card is used. However, unlike many retailers, Target also offers a Target Red debit card.

Applying the adage of “if it walks like a duck and talks like a duck,” the debit version of Target Red is raising some potential concerns among its users.

According to the assertions in a class action litigation in federal court, the Target Debit Card is not really a "debit card." The litigation contends that consumers may have been fooled into thinking the card worked exactly like every other debit card -- specifically, that if there’s money in a connected account, then it will be used to cover a transaction. For standard debit cards, a transaction will generally be cancelled or declined if there’s not enough money in the account.

However, this may not be the case for Target’s debit card. According to reports, it’s possible that even though the connected account has insufficient fees, a purchase using the Target Red debit card can still be be approved. The catch at that point is that such an non-sufficient funds (NSF) purchase can trigger a Return Payment Fee from Target on top of an NSF fee from a consumer’s bank. In some situations, those penalties can total more than $60.

But the fee snowball going down the hill doesn’t stop there. According to TopClassActions, Target can further attempt to submit the transaction through the consumer’s bank up to two more times. Of course, each of those tries can add even more fees from both Target and the bank -- as much as $100 -- if those attempts turn up as NSFs.

The fine print vs. what’s reasonable

In the class action suit of James Walters v. Target Corp., Target makes it clear that to become one of their debit cardholders, a customer must sign an agreement with Target that spells out various terms and conditions.

Walters, on the other hand, alleges that an "inherent feature of a debit card is immediate processing of a transaction by either seizing deposit account funds or declining a transaction."

Because a debit card can be immediately processed, Walters alleges it is impossible for a true debit card transaction to directly trigger overdraft or NSF fees by spending more than available funds.

Adding more fuel to Walters’ fire, he argues that that Target's practice of misstating the card as a debit card is intentional, focused on producing returned payment fees (RPF) fees and saving on automated clearinghouse (ACH) transaction fees by combining transactions together over a period of days and, then, processing them as a group.

At the core of this suit is the term "reasonable." In the judge’s order that both granted and denied parts of Target’s motion for reconsideration, the judge used "reasonable" eight times in explaining his decisions.

For example, in siding with the plaintiff, the judge wrote that "reasonable consumers are not required to look past misleading labels to clarifying fine print."

In partial favor to Target, the judge wrote that "a reasonable jury could conclude that Target exercised its discretion in bad faith by always delaying electronic funds transfers (EFT) and charging maximum RPF when [the Agreement] said only that [Target] may engage in such practices. Target contends that this ruling was clear error because the Agreement expressly permits such practices. Target's argument is partially correct."

Is Target the only one to blame?

Reports are that both Shell and Nordstrom debit card customers had the same experience as Target’s.

If you have a Target Red debit card and found that you were charged a return payment or insufficient funds fee from your bank, it’s possible you qualify to participate in a Target Red debit card class action lawsuit investigation which could recover reimbursement for fees, financial damages, and more.

Like most retailers, Target offers holders of their Red credit card special deals from time to time, such as the retailer’s current promotion of 5 percent...

Article Image

Navy Federal upgrading its Visa Signature Flagship Rewards card

Credit card issuers have stepped up their game in recent months, introducing cards with more perks and upgrading current cards to make them more attractive to consumers.

Earlier this month Chase teamed up with Expedia to provide extra travel booking options on its Chase Ultimate Travel Rewards card. Also this month American Express added fraud protections, allowing cardholders to place temporary freezes on their cards' use.

Now, Navy Federal Credit Union is relaunching its Visa Signature Flagship Rewards credit card, currently in the wallets of about 98,000 consumers. The new card, which launches September 5, provides an increase in rewards and other perks. The credit union says the makeover transforms the card from a traditional rewards card to one "fit for travelers, adventure seekers and everyday commuters."

More points

Cardholders will get three times the points on all travel related spending, including ride sharing and trains. All other non-travel purchases will get two times the points. One point is worth 1 cent when redeemed for cash, travel or gift cards.

Other perks include:

  • Up to $100 statement credit for Global Entry or TSA Pre-Check®

  • One point is now equal to $0.01 when you redeem for cash, travel or gift cards

  • No foreign transaction fees

  • No balance transfer fees

  • No limit on rewards earned and rewards never expire

The annual fee is waived for the first year but the card carries a $49 a year fee after that.

Credit card issuers have stepped up their game in recent months, introducing cards with more perks and upgrading current cards to make them more attractive...

Article Image

Kroger mulls over decision to stop taking Visa credit cards

Taking a shot directly across the credit card industry’s bow, Kroger’s California subsidiary Foods Co will no longer accept Visa as a form of payment.

Effective August 14, 2018, the Visa payment option will vanish from 26 Foods Co stores and fuel centers. It’s a strong first punch from the chain in retail’s continuing weariness over the estimated $90 billion paid in swipe fees every year.

“Our customers consistently tell us that one of the most important factors in choosing Foods Co as their supermarket of choice is our low prices,” wrote Bryan Kaltenbach, president of Foods Co, in a news release.

“We realize this will be a change for some customers, but we believe this change will benefit all our customers by allowing our Foods Co stores to continue to offer the things our customers value most, including our low prices, fresh produce and services more than payment type.”

Kroger CIO Chris Hjelm said in an interview with Bloomberg News that Food Co’s parent company might follow in its footsteps.

“It’s pretty clear we need to move down this path, and if we have to expand that beyond Foods Co, we’re prepared to take that step,” Hjelm said. “When the amount retailers pay in card fees gets out of alignment, as we believe it is now, we don’t believe we have a choice but to use whatever mechanism possible to get it back in alignment.”

Foods Co customers will still have plenty of available payment options at retail locations, including Visa debit cards, SNAP, MasterCard, American Express, Discover credit cards, and, naturally, cash and checks.

The cost of doing business?

The National Retail Federation (NRF) reports that swipe fees are often cited by retailers as the second or third highest cost behind wages and health benefits. Industry profits barely get over the 2 percent mark, and the added expense of credit card costs are usually passed on to consumers in the price they pay for goods.

By the NRF’s estimate, the typical household is quietly charged with hundreds of dollars in additional expenses per year thanks to price markups retailers use to offset swipe fees.

Swipe fees average around 2 percent but can be double that for premium rewards cards. VISA and MasterCard establish the fee structure, and participating banks issuing the cards agree to charge the same.

In a statement to ConsumerAffairs, R.K. Hammer -- Chairman and CEO of the credit card advisory firm Payment Industry Consultants -- said that Kroger's decision is likely more of a challenge to Visa over its swipe fees.

"Eliminating the largest payment brand in the world may not be something that Kroger’s shoppers will at all appreciate. I suspect that the 'test' being done in one tiny network of Kroger’s affiliates is designed to get Visa’s attention, and perhaps restructure a more acceptable, lower swipe fee. Maybe it will work. Maybe it will backfire. Time will tell," he said.

Is this legal?

Kroger is not the first retailer to try and bring a credit card company to its knees. In 2013, merchants in New York challenged the constitutionality of a state law forbidding merchants from imposing a surcharge on any customer who pays with a credit card.

And, just last month, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that American Express' credit card rules for merchants, and the fees that it charges, do not violate antitrust laws.

The grocery giant’s volley comes on the heels of Walmart's move to jettison Synchrony Financial after the two couldn't agree to terms. Amazon is also said to be in talks with JPMorgan Chase, Capital One, and other banks and financial firms about creating a “checking-account-like” product for its customers, a move that could save the company $250 million.

Despite all the pushback against the credit card industry, Visa seems undaunted. Last year, Visa reportedly offered thousands of dollars to small merchants if they agreed to stop taking cash.

The credit card company called its path a "journey to cashless,” sermonizing that “At Visa, we believe you can be everywhere you want to be, and that it should be easy to pay and be paid in more ways than ever – whether it’s a phone, card, wearable or other device.”

Taking a shot directly across the credit card industry’s bow, Kroger’s California subsidiary Foods Co will no longer accept Visa as a form of payment.E...

Article Image

Many consumers incorrectly believe carrying a credit card balance raises credit score

There are several things consumers can do to raise their credit score, but carrying a credit card balance is not one of them.

Yet, a new survey from CreditCards.com shows 22 percent of consumers have carried a balance on the mistaken belief that it would add points to their credit score. All they got was a higher interest charge.

Having a credit card account does help your credit standing. Consumers get points when a lender extends them credit.

They get even more points when they use credit wisely. Paying off the balance each month makes a consumer look responsible in the eyes of a lender. On the other hand, utilizing too much of their credit line on an ongoing basis can drag down a credit score.

New idea

The idea that carrying a balance raises a credit score may be relatively new. The survey showed the younger you are, the more likely you are to believe it.

Education also plays a role. Twenty-seven percent of cardholders without a college education have carried a balance, thinking they'll help their credit score. Only 12 percent of college graduates have done so.

"It's painful to know that so many millions of Americans are essentially attempting to pay their card issuers to improve their credit scores," said Matt Schultz, CreditCards.com's senior industry analyst. "The fact of the matter is that carrying a balance will never improve your score."

With interest rates now rising, Schultz says consumers should make every effort to pay off their credit card bills in full each month. At the very least, they should pay on time.

Pay on time

Paying bills on time is one of the most important factors affecting credit scores. Paying on time will raise the score, missing a payment or paying late will drag it down.

Yet 42 percent of the consumers in the survey admitted to being late in paying their credit card bill -- with 24 percent doing so more than once. Schultz says many of these late or missed payments might have been avoided with a little organization.

Seventy-one percent of cardholders who said they missed a payment did so because they forgot to pay it, were busy, or were out of town. In addition to damaging a credit rating, a late payment can be costly, since most credit card companies assess a late fee of $30 or more.

Unfortunately, there are other reasons consumers missed credit card payments. Among those who are habitually late in making their payment, the most often cited reason is not having the money.

There are several things consumers can do to raise their credit score, but carrying a credit card balance is not one of them.Yet, a new survey from Cre...

Article Image

PayPal launches Venmo-branded debit card

Venmo has announced that it is launching a new MasterCard debit card that will allow users to make in-store and online payments with their Venmo balance.

The card, which is issued by the Bancorp Bank, is being rolled out in an effort to expand Venmo’s monetization potential and help the company reach more younger consumers.

The peer-to-peer payment app says that if a cardholder has a low balance, the card will reload using the user’s preferred funding source. Venmo says its new card will allow up to $400 in daily withdrawals. There’s a $2.50 fee to withdraw money from your Venmo account using an ATM, but no fee to make regular purchases.

Card purchases will show up on a transaction history in the app, which will give users the ability to split charges among friends. Also within the app, users can deactivate the card when it’s misplaced and then reactivate it when it’s found.

The card features a vertical design and comes in a choice of six colors -- yellow, pink, blue, green, black, and white. It has a chip for security and an icon near the chip that indicates support for contactless payments.

Venmo says users can now “get in line” for the card, adding that it’s striving to quickly move people off the waitlist and process applications. There’s no fee to sign up for it, and it should arrive within 5 to 7 days after approval. The card can be used everywhere MasterCard is accepted, but only in the United States.  

Last fall, PayPal added the ability for Venmo users to shop on the mobile web at almost everywhere PayPal is accepted. In the first quarter of this year, Venmo processed around $12 billion in payments.

Venmo has announced that it is launching a new MasterCard debit card that will allow users to make in-store and online payments with their Venmo balance....

Article Image

Starbucks & Chase release new prepaid card for collecting coffee points

On Monday, Chase and Starbucks announced a brand new prepaid Visa debit card -- the first prepaid or debit product that allows customers to collect “Stars” outside of Starbucks. Customers who have the card can link it to their Starbucks loyalty account and redeem the Stars they’ve earned at Starbucks retailers.

Starbucks is touting the new card as the first -- and only -- prepaid card that lets consumers earn Stars with any purchase, whether inside or outside of Starbucks. Chase customers can use the debit card at any retailer that accepts Visa, both in stores and online.

“We want to offer Starbucks customers a flexible card that delivers more Star-earning potential in the fastest way possible,” said Jennifer Roberts, head of Digital Products for Chase.

Customer benefits

The new card offers many new customer benefits that Starbucks lovers won’t want to miss out on. For starters, once enrolling, customers will automatically be promoted to Gold Status in Starbucks’ rewards program. This allows customers to redeem a free drink or food item each time they reach 125 stars.

Additionally, upon enrollment, customers will receive 125 bonus stars once they use their Visa card to load $10 to their registered Starbucks card. From then on, they will receive one star for every $10 spent with the card. Other perks include birthday rewards, the ability to order ahead, and free refills in stores. Also, Gold Star status allows customers to earn double stars on select days each month.

“This reloadable Visa Prepaid card is a unique and modern option that gives customers one more way to earn more stars and rewards through everyday spend, in a way they haven’t been able to before,” said Matt Ryan, chief marketing officer for Starbucks. “As we continue to expand and strengthen our digital relationship with customers, we want to make sure we’re providing choices that are both rewarding and meet their preferences in how they engage with us.”

Another card from Starbucks

This new Visa prepaid card comes after the coffee chain announced a partnership with Chase -- and a different credit card -- earlier this year.

This past February, Starbucks and Chase launched a Visa credit card that can be integrated into Starbucks’ rewards program. While the card offered customers a number of perks to help them earn rewards at Starbucks locations, it also came with a $49 annual fee.

“The catch is that Stars can only be redeemed at Starbucks, which is far more limiting than rewards cards that offer cash back or travel rewards,” said Kimberly Palmer, NerdWallet’s credit card expert. “The Starbucks card will likely appeal only to the most die-hard Starbucks fans who would get enough value out of their Stars to justify the annual fee.”

On Monday, Chase and Starbucks announced a brand new prepaid Visa debit card -- the first prepaid or debit product that allows customers to collect “Stars”...

Article Image

The average credit card charges over four different fees

Just because the credit card in your wallet doesn't charge an annual fee, that doesn't mean there are no fees attached to it.

An analysis of 200 popular credit cards by CompareCards, part of LendingTree, has found every credit card charges at least one fee, with the average card assessing 4.35 different kinds of fees.

You may or may not pay them, however, depending on how you use the card. The study found that cards issued by credit unions have the fewest fees, with an average of 2.73 fees per card.

The most common fee the analysis found is the charge for a late payment. Just about every card has a charge for that. The average late payment fee is $36, but consumers can avoid it by always paying their bill on time.

Another hefty charge is the one assessed for cash advances. If you use your card to borrow cash, the average fee is 3.99 percent of the amount borrowed.

In addition to the upfront fee, consumers pay the prevailing credit card interest rate on the balance, making it a very expensive loan. A cheaper option might be a personal loan, or a home equity loan.

Balance transfer fee

Some cards allow you to transfer a balance, a popular feature if the balance transfer card offers an extended period of zero percent interest. However, just about every balance transfer card charges a transfer fee, averaging 3.46 percent of the transferred amount. A small number of cards, including the Chase Slate Card, waive that transfer fee under certain conditions.

Many cards have a foreign transaction fee, which averages 3 percent of the purchase. Keep in mind you don't have to physically be out of the country to pay this. If you make online purchases from a foreign-based company, you'll pay the fee if your credit card is one that assesses it.

If you're shopping for a credit card, one issued by a credit union will typically charge fewer and smaller fees than those issued by banks. Late payment fees average $10 less than charges from bank-issued cards. Fees for certain types of transactions — like balance transfers, foreign transactions, and cash advances — were also lower than those charged by banks.

Rewards cards

Rewards and cash-back credit cards also tend to have more moderate fees. But getting hit with a fee or two can quickly erode any rewards you might be getting.

“Fees are the second largest cost that cardholders incur, after interest assessed on balances," said Brian Karimzad, vice president of Research at CompareCards. "Even one late fee per year can significantly erode any benefit a user might receive from a cashback or travel rewards card."

The CARD Act of 2009, passed in the wake of the financial crisis, has significantly reduced the number of fees credit card companies can charge. But the study shows the fees that remain tend to be higher than they were a decade ago.

Just because the credit card in your wallet doesn't charge an annual fee, that doesn't mean there are no fees attached to it.An analysis of 200 popular...

Article Image

Average credit card rate now exceeds 15 percent

The average rate on credit card balances, as measured by a credit card comparison site, has hit an 18-year high, meaning consumers carrying balances are paying more in interest.

But a bright spot in the CompareCards.com analysis shows consumers paid off a big chunk of their credit card balances, perhaps applying some of their tax refunds to their debt.

Despite the fact that the interest rate on everything from mortgages to car loans remains near historic lows, CompareCards puts the average credit card interest rate at 15.3 percent, an 18-year high. A consumer with a $10,000 credit card balance would pay an average of more than $1,500 in interest if they paid nothing on the principal.

Credit cards are unsecured loans, which is why their rates are always higher. They are also closely tied to the Federal Reserve's discount rate. As the Fed begins to normalize that rate – which was held at near zero percent for years – it puts upward pressure on credit card rates.

Credit card rates are also higher now than they were two decades ago, relative to the prime rate – the rate banks charge their best customers. Eighteen years ago, when the average credit card rate was over 15 percent, the prime rate was more than nine percent.

Today, the prime rate is just 4.75 percent, meaning the average credit card rate is more than 10 percentage points higher.

Paying off debt

Between January and March, consumers appeared to make progress in paying down their credit card balances. The CompareCards analysis shows revolving debt, made up primarily of credit card balances, dropped by $52.7 billion. It was the largest paydown since 2010, at the end of the Great Recession.

March is traditionally the lowest month in the year for credit card balances. If this year follows the usual pattern, balances will begin to rise throughout the year. As we reported last week, LendingTree projects consumers will owe a total of $4 trillion by the end of the year.

Rising debt is often a sign of an improving economy. With more people employed, more consumers may be willing to make major purchases and finance them with credit cards.

People are also earning more money, but the CompareCards analysis shows consumers are spending money at a faster rate than they are earning it. Spending rose in March for the first time in two months.

The average rate on credit card balances, as measured by a credit card comparison site, has hit an 18-year high, meaning consumers carrying balances are pa...

Article Image

Visa policy change credited with speeding dispute resolution

When Visa recently introduced changes to its Visa Claims Resolution (VCR) policy, consumers found they were able to resolve credit card charge backs faster and more efficiently, a new report says.

MyChargeBack, a company assisting consumers in reversing disputed credit card payments, has found the new VCR is making it easier for consumers to recover their money.

The policy change was introduced last year and standardized procedures and timetables. Alan Tepfer, MyChargeBack's director of client strategies and fund recovery, said Visa's streamlined processes and automation has actually reduced the number of disputed credit card charges.

"The most significant improvement in the system is that Visa is taking every possible precaution to avoid disputes before they begin and speed them up once they do," Tepfer said. "Card holders now receive more detailed monthly statements, improved attention to customer service, an extra layer of security checks, and quicker approval of chargebacks when they are entitled to them."

What's a chargeback?

A chargeback occurs when a consumer makes a credit card purchase, then determines the sale was made under deceptive or false pretenses. If the merchant refuses to offer a refund, the consumer can then go directly to the credit card company and ask that it retrieve the money from the merchant.

Tepfer says consumers are now seeing a faster response when they request a chargeback. He credits Visa's streamlining of the dispute categories from 22 to four, and reducing the time limit that merchants have to respond, from 45 days to 30 days. In the future, he says that will fall to just 20 days.

"A major benefit for consumers is that merchants are now required to disprove customer evidence up front," Tepfer said. "Since no additional information is allowed be added afterwards, the merchant now has just a single opportunity to deny the consumer's allegations before Visa reaches its decision regarding the case."

Disputing a charge

The flip side of that, of course, is that consumers also have just one opportunity to present their evidence, so it's important to have all your facts straight.

Creditcards.com advises that a consumer's first step in a dispute is to request a refund from the merchant. If the merchant is not cooperative, call the customer service number on the back of your credit card and tell the representative you want to dispute a charge.

Different issuers may have different requirements, so follow their specific instructions. Provide any records or evidence to bolster your case.

Some of the most commonly accepted reasons for a chargeback include not receiving the item you ordered, receiving a substandard product, being incorrectly billed, and being billed for something you didn't order.

When Visa recently introduced changes to its Visa Claims Resolution (VCR) policy, consumers found they were able to resolve credit card charge backs faster...

Article Image

Credit card companies will stop requiring signatures this month

This month, four of the largest credit card companies -- American Express, Discover, Mastercard, and Visa -- will stop requiring a signature for purchases made with a card that uses a security chip.

Credit card companies say the computer chips embedded in cards are much more effective at preventing fraud than scribbled signatures, since merchants rarely verify a person’s signature after asking for their credit card.

Experts say consumer signatures have become virtually meaningless in the age of chip cards and contactless payment systems (like Apple Pay), so phasing them out won’t likely have much of an impact.

Transitioning away from signatures

The change is optional, meaning some shops and restaurants -- such as those without chip card compatibility, for instance -- may not adopt the change right away. However, major retailers like Walmart have already decided to stop requiring signatures on card transactions.

Walmart considers signatures “worthless as a point of sales verification” and has already stopped recording them on most transactions, according to a company spokesman. It plans to get rid of them completely in the near future. Target will eliminate signature requirements this month.

The change will likely speed up the checkout process and likely won’t even be noticed by many consumers.

According to research by Mastercard, nearly one in five Americans (17 percent) don’t remember the last time they used their signature outside of a sales receipt, while 20 percent of those 18-34 years and 14 percent of those 55 and older don’t remember.

Chip is better at preventing fraud

Mastercard said the change had been a long time coming, but the decision to do away with signature requirements was delayed until cards embedded with chips became common. A separate report by Visa found that counterfeit fraud has dropped 70 percent since chip cards were introduced in October 2015.

“Our fraud capabilities have advanced so that signatures are no longer necessary,” said Jaromir Divilek, American Express’s Executive Vice President of Global Network Business, in a statement.

The four largest credit card companies in the nation will stop requiring merchants to ask for customers’ signatures starting April 14.

This month, four of the largest credit card companies -- American Express, Discover, Mastercard, and Visa -- will stop requiring a signature for purchases...

Article Image

USAA and Discover top annual credit card ratings

Considering a new credit card? Temkin Group has released its 2018 credit card ratings, giving USAA and Discover the highest marks for customer experience.

Temkin reviewed 11 companies that issue credit cards and gave USAA the highest score, with a rating of 77 percent. Discover finished second with a rating of 75 percent.

As an industry, credit cards fell slightly from last year's overall ranking. Here's how the various card issuers stack up:

  1. USAA: 77 percent

  2. Discover: 75 percent

  3. Barclaycard: 73 percent

  4. Chase: 72 percent

  5. American Express: 71 percent

  6. Citigroup: 68 percent

  7. U.S. Bank: 68 percent

  8. Capital One: 67 percent

  9. Bank of America: 66 percent

  10. Wells Fargo: 64 percent

  11. HSBC: 52 percent

'Legitimate improvements'

"In 2017, many of these credit card issuers saw double-digit increases in their scores," said Bruce Temkin, managing partner of Temkin Group. "The fact they managed – for the most part – to sustain those higher scores shows that those gains were not just an anomaly, but actually represented legitimate improvements to their customer experience."

USAA serves the military community, both active duty and retired, along with family members. It offers the Preferred Cash Rewards Visa Signature card, providing 1.5 percent cash back on every purchase.

It also issues the Cashback Rewards Plus American Express card, paying 5 percent cash back on the first $3,000 in gasoline and military base purchases. It pays 2 percent cash back on your first $3,000 in supermarket purchases and 1 percent on everything else.

Temkin says USAA's customer experience score showed the most improvement over the previous year, rising four percentage points. HSBC's score fell the most year-over-year, declining by 17 points.

Considering a new credit card? Temkin Group has released its 2018 credit card ratings, giving USAA and Discover the highest marks for customer experience....

Article Image

Survey finds 39 percent of rewards cardholders are paying interest

Rewards credit cards are popular with consumers. Some cards pay cash back on purchases while some provide travel perks.

But consumers who load those cards up with debt that they carry month to month will find that interest charges erode many of those rewards. A recent survey by CompareCards.com found that 39 percent of consumers with a rewards card carry a balance. The researchers say the average balance is $2,547.

The net result isn't all that rewarding. Let's assume that the average cash back on those purchases is 1.5 percent; that means a consumer would earn $38.20 in rewards. But with the average credit card interest rate north of 16 percent, the cardholder pays hefty interest on that balance each month.

In a year's time, interest charges would amount to at least $407.52. While it's true that the rewards offset at least a small portion of those charges, the consumer would have been ahead by paying the balance in full each month.

Rewards should be used for something fun, not paying interest. Ironically, the survey found that the most popular use of rewards was paying down debt.

Many consumers have more than one rewards card

The survey also found that while most people with rewards credit cards only had one or two, a quarter of those in the survey said they carried three or more rewards credit cards.

The authors point out that having a lot of rewards cards isn't necessarily a problem, as long as you don't run up debt on all of them. When you do, they don't reward you -- they cost you.

If you have a credit card with a large balance, the most rewarding credit card -- the one that saves the most money -- is a balance transfer card with zero percent interest for a lengthy introductory period.

An example

The Chase Slate Card is just one of several balance transfer cards, but it is attractive because there is no balance transfer fee if the transfer is made within 60 days of opening the account. The cardholder would pay no interest on the transferred balance for 15 months.

Using the example of a $2,547 balance at 16 percent APR, eliminating the $407.52 interest charges beats the cash back rewards most credit cards will pay. Monthly payments of $169.80 would pay off the balance in 15 months without paying any interest.

That’s not a bad reward.

Rewards credit cards are popular with consumers. Some cards pay cash back on purchases while some provide travel perks.But consumers who load those car...

Article Image

Citi refunding $335 million back to its overcharged credit card customers

Citigroup is about to put a bundle back in its credit card customers’ wallets thanks to a miscalculation on the annual percentage rate (APR).

With hat in hand, the company owned up to the mistake quickly both to the credit card accounts involved as well as federal regulators.

“While we have found no evidence of employee misconduct, we should have identified these issues sooner,” said company spokeswoman Elizabeth Fogarty in a statement. “We sincerely apologize to our customers and are taking every action to provide refunds as quickly as possible.”

Around 1.75 million of Citi’s U.S. credit card accounts dating from 2011-2017 are impacted – about 1 percent of Citi card holders during that time frame. On average, those affected by the error will receive $190.

What exactly happened

The Credit Card Accountability Responsibility and Disclosure Act mandates that any card issuer whose rates increase over time must examine those accounts every six months.

In Citi’s case, it was the more creditworthy customers who took the hit. In the company’s interest rate review, the method it used to calculate APRs didn’t accurately reflect the total benefit customers should have received for good behavior, such as making timely payments and having higher amounts of available credit.

The current APR range on Citi’s credit cards runs between 14.24 and 25.24 percent based on a customer’s “creditworthiness.”

If you’re affected, what’s next?

In last Friday’s securities filing acknowledging the issue and cost, Citi insisted it’s in the process of reviewing accounts and plans on having refund checks sent to its customers by the second half of 2018.

This isn’t the first mistake that Citi has made in recent memory. In late 2017, the bank’s Australian arm refunded more than $3.3 million AU ($2.59 million US) to some 40,000 customers. The company’s gaffe down under was that it neglected to refund customers whose credit card accounts were closed with an existing balance.

Citigroup is about to put a bundle back in its credit card customers’ wallets thanks to a miscalculation on the annual percentage rate (APR).With hat i...

Article Image

Federal Reserve limits Wells Fargo's growth, demands board changes

The Federal Reserve has taken stern measures against Wells Fargo, telling the bank it will not be allowed to grow until it "sufficiently improves its governance and controls."

The action comes against the backdrop of Wells Fargo's 2016 revelation that it opened millions of bank and credit card accounts without customers' knowledge or consent. The bank has faced class action lawsuits and has already settled with U.S. regulators, paying $185 million in fines.

It also replaced its CEO and three board members, but the Fed says that isn't sufficient to make up for past abuses and to prevent them from happening in the future. At the direction of the Fed, Wells Fargo will replace three more board members by April and a fourth by the end of the year.

The meat of the order is a requirement that Wells Fargo improve its governance and risk management processes, including making its board of directors more accountable for oversight. The Fed order says Wells Fargo will not be allowed to grow in total assets beyond its size at the end of 2017 until it makes improvements that meet regulators' approval.

'Pervasive and persistent misconduct'

"We cannot tolerate pervasive and persistent misconduct at any bank, and the consumers harmed by Wells Fargo expect that robust and comprehensive reforms will be put in place to make certain that the abuses do not occur again," said outgoing Fed Chair Janet Yellen.

"The enforcement action we are taking today will ensure that Wells Fargo will not expand until it is able to do so safely and with the protections needed to manage all of its risks and protect its customers."

For its part, Wells Fargo said it is committed to satisfying the Federal Reserve's order.

“We take this order seriously and are focused on addressing all of the Federal Reserve’s concerns,” company CEO Timothy Sloan said it in statement. “It is important to note that the consent order is not related to any new matters, but to prior issues where we have already made significant progress. We appreciate the Federal Reserve’s acknowledgment of our actions to date.”

The Fed took Wells Fargo to task for pursuing what it called "a business strategy that prioritized its overall growth without ensuring appropriate management of all key risks."

Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), an early Wells Fargo critic, said she had repeatedly pressed Yellen to take tougher action against the bank.

"Today she did it, in her last act as Fed Chair," Warren said. "Fines alone will never rein in fraudulent behavior at the big banks."

The Federal Reserve has taken stern measures against Wells Fargo, telling the bank it will not be allowed to grow until it "sufficiently improves its gover...

Article Image

Credit card companies saying no to cryptocurrency purchases

One by one, major banks are telling their credit card customers they can't use their plastic to purchase Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies.

Bank of America, JP Morgan Chase, and Citigroup are no longer allowing transactions for digital currency with their credit cards, according to a report by Bloomberg News. Credit card issuers Capital One and Discover have also said no to crypto transactions.

In the UK, Lloyds Banking Group, which includes Halifax, MBNA, and Bank of Scotland, has issued a similar edict. The reasons for the prohibition are multifaceted.

Law enforcement concerns

Law enforcement agencies have expressed concerns over cryptocurrency transactions because most of them are untraceable. By the same token, banks worry that their credit cards could be used to launder money through purchases of digital currency.

Banks are also worried about an increase in credit card fraud. They fear an increase in stolen credit cards, which could then be used to make cryptocurrency purchases.

There is also the issue of consumers making ill-conceived, speculative purchases with their credit cards, only to have the value of what they bought fall significantly. Sort of like what has happened with Bitcoin.

As the value of Bitcoin skyrocketed to nearly $20,000 in 2017, tales of Bitcoin riches began to circulate online, with more people hoping to cash in.

But if a purchaser doesn’t have $20,000 in cash, they might have that much on their credit card credit limit. If they used their credit card to buy in when Bitcoin was at $17,000 they are now in trouble. The digital currency's value recently dipped below $8,000.

Wild West

The National Foundation for Credit Counseling (NFCC) represents non-profit credit counselors who help consumers get out from under massive credit card debt. NFCC vice president Bruce McClary believes the banks are making the right move.

"The world of cryptocurrency is like the wild west right now, with market volatility and fraud among the top concerns," McClary told ConsumerAffairs. "Bringing credit cards into the mix elevates the risk to both the borrower and the credit card issuer, so it makes better sense to keep the plastic out of the picture when considering an investment in this area."

On Wall Street, stocks are routinely purchased "on margin," meaning with borrowed money. Brokers loan investors the money to make stock purchases and typically charge around eight percent interest, securing the loan with the value of the brokerage account.

But when someone buys a cryptocurrency using a credit card, the loan is unsecured -- posing a big risk to the lender. Additionally, the borrower pays a credit card interest rate of 16 percent or more.

As a result, the highly-volatile cryptocurrency trading market poses huge risks to both the investor and the lender if cyptocurrencies are purchased using a credit card.

One by one, major banks are telling their credit card customers they can't use their plastic to purchase Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies.Bank of Ame...

Article Image

Starbucks launches its own rewards credit card

Starbucks has launched a branded Visa card that will be integrated directly into its Starbucks Rewards loyalty program.

Customers using the card, issued by JPMorgan Chase, can earn "Stars" with every purchase and redeem them for food and beverages at more than 8,000 participating Starbucks locations.

If not already a member of the Starbucks Rewards loyalty program, cardholders will be automatically enrolled.

“It’s important to us to make earning rewards as easy for our customers as possible, and the Starbucks Rewards Visa Card is a powerful tool for us to do that because of how easily it fits into their daily lives,” said Matt Ryan, executive vice president and chief strategy officer for Starbucks.

Approved applicants will receive a physical card within seven to 10 days, but a digital card will be immediately loaded into the Starbucks mobile app so customers can start using it right away.

Annual fee

Kimberly Palmer, NerdWallet's credit card expert, notes the new rewards card carries a $49 annual fee, potentially cutting into rewards.

"The catch is that Stars can only be redeemed at Starbucks, which is far more limiting than rewards cards that offer cash back or travel rewards," Palmer told ConsumerAffairs. "The Starbucks card will likely appeal only to the most die-hard Starbucks fans who would get enough value out of their Stars to justify the annual fee."

Starbucks says new cardmembers will get 2,500 Stars after spending $500 on purchases in the first three months the account is open. That's equal to 20 food or beverage items.

They will also receive 250 bonus Stars if they use their new Starbucks credit card to load their registered Starbucks Card within the Starbucks mobile app.

For every $4 spent outside of Starbucks, cardholders will receive an additional Star, along with a Star for every dollar digitally loaded to their registered Starbucks Card in the Starbucks mobile app.

And just for signing up for the Starbucks credit card, customers will be upgraded to Gold Status within the loyalty program.

Starbucks has launched a branded Visa card that will be integrated directly into its Starbucks Rewards loyalty program.Customers using the card, issued...

Article Image

Three habits to help you pay down your credit card bills

Why do some consumers struggle under the weight of credit card debt while others are able to pay it down to manageable levels?

A new survey from CompareCards suggests the adoption of certain money habits may hold the key. In particular, it found three habits have the best chance of turning around a debt burden.

Thomas Donaldson, Senior Credit Specialist at CompareCards, says devising a plan to pay off the debt -- whether setting aside an extra monthly amount to contribute to paying it off, or using a more complex budgetary plan – made the biggest difference among those who were successful and unsuccessful in meeting their goal to pay down debt.

"Seventy-five percent of people who created a specific plan to pay off their debt last year succeeded, while just 51% of those who didn’t succeeded," Donaldson told ConsumerAffairs. "A plan holds you accountable – to yourself, and ideally, to those around you."

Controlling spending

The survey also found that consumers who were able to exercise budget discipline and reduce their monthly spending had more success in getting out of debt. Many people who can't stop spending actually run up more debt. Spending less also provides a little extra money for credit card payments.

Finally, consumers who successfully reduced their debt also created a savings account -- specifically, an emergency fund. Having extra cash on hand for emergency expenses means not having to cover an unexpected expense with credit.

Credit counselors and financial advisors are often helpful in reducing debt, but Donaldson says the consumers in the survey mostly figured it out on their own.

"Just 10 percent of people who were successful paying off their debt cited talking about their plan to pay down debt with someone," he said. "The habits of the successful involve taking initiative – reducing spending, finding a way to earn extra income, and keeping track of progress."

Repeat failure

Those who succeeded in paying down debt tended to improve their financial condition last year. But Donaldson says more than one third of those who said they were unsuccessful at paying off debt last year said it was a repeat failure for them.

"Despite that experience, just 55 percent of them created a specific plan to help them pay down that debt last year," he said.

Consumers in the survey who reported progress in paying off debt offered a number of reasons for their success. One said it required changing his mindset and treating any spending that required credit as "a giant stop sign."

Another said the process can be lengthy, so it's important for people to stay motivated to reach their goal.

Why do some consumers struggle under the weight of credit card debt while others are able to pay it down to manageable levels?A new survey from Compare...

Article Image

Credit card rewards expected to improve in 2018

Consumers applying for a credit card in 2018 will have even more attractive options as the industry's competition for customers shows no signs of letting up.

Last year saw an increase in rewards and a decline in fees. Thomas Donaldson, Senior Credit Specialist at CompareCards, predicts credit card perks will get even better in the months ahead.

"Heading into 2018, the credit card landscape is more competitive than ever as issuers compete for the number one spot in consumer’s wallets," Donaldson told ConsumerAffairs. "When banks compete, consumers win."

Cash is king

Because cashback credit cards are so popular with consumers, Donaldson says banks will issue more of them, with increasingly generous rewards. Banks are also creating travel rewards structures that mimic cashback programs.

The Discover it -- Cashback Match card pays five percent cash back at different places each quarter like gas stations, Amazon.com, grocery stores, restaurants, or wholesale clubs up to a maximum level each quarter. It pays one percent on all other purchases.

The Chase Freedom card is another popular cashback choice. It pays five percent cash back on up to $1,500 in combined purchases in bonus categories each quarter. The cardholder sets the categories based on his or her spending priorities.

Because consumers racked up an estimated $43 billion in holiday debt, the most valuable rewards credit card may be one that lets you transfer a balance from another card and pay no interest for an extended period.

Better balance transfer offers

Donaldson says the balance transfer offers are getting better in 2018. So far this month, there are more cards offering a $0 introductory fee for balance transfers and zero percent rates for over a year.

For consumers making payments on a $10,000 credit card balance at 17 percent interest, the savings would amount to around $140 a month.

"Since the Fed started raising rates at the end of 2015, the average interest rate on outstanding credit card balances has increased 86 basis points, according to a CompareCards analysis of Federal Reserve data," Donaldson said. “That represents $7 billion in extra interest owed this year for Americans who carry a balance on their credit card."

The Fed is expected to raise rates as many as three times in 2018, meaning interest charges are likely to go even higher. That makes a balance transfer card even more attractive.

The BankAmericard offers a 15-month zero percent introductory period if balances are transferred in the first 60 days the account is open. It also waives the three percent balance transfer fee if the transfer is made in that 60 day window.

"Banks are sweetening the balance transfer deal for consumers looking for a way out of credit card debt," Donaldson said. "More cards offer $0 intro fees to transfer a balance and longer zero percent intro APR. That gives people a more cost-effective way to pay down debt without new monthly interest piling up."

Donaldson says 2018 will also see improvements to loyalty programs, as banks try to keep their current customers happy. That means consumers might not have to apply for a new card this year in order enjoy added rewards.

Consumers applying for a credit card in 2018 will have even more attractive options as the industry's competition for customers shows no signs of letting u...

Article Image

Federal Reserve raises key interest rate

The Federal Reserve Open Market Committee has voted to raise its key interest rate .25 percent, the third rate hike this year.

That puts the fed's discount rate in a range of 1.25 to 1.5 percent, and the move will likely affect millions of consumers. The Fed discount rate has almost no bearing on mortgage rates, but it does influence auto loans and credit card rates.

The rate of auto loans, near historic lows, may rise slightly, adding very little to the average car payment. John Ganotis, founder of CreditCardInsider.com, says the impact on credit card rates may be felt more deeply.

"If you're carrying any credit card debt, your interest rate is likely going up with each Fed rate increase,” Ganotis told ConsumerAffairs. "Almost all credit cards have variable APRs, which means they're tied to the Fed rate."

That means when the Fed rate is increased a quarter point, consumers will likely see that same increase in the interest rate they pay on credit card balances.

Peddling into a headwind

"It's like peddling into a progressively stiffer headwind," Greg McBride, CFA, Bankrate.com's chief financial analyst said in an interview. "You have to work harder and harder to pay down that debt."

When interest rates rise on credit card balances, it doesn't necessarily impact the monthly payment, but it does mean consumers will have to spend more to pay off the debt. That usually extends the time it takes to pay off the balance.

While a quarter of a point seems like a small increase, McBride says the cumulative effect is what should concern consumers. He notes this is the fifth interest rate hike in the last two years, meaning the rate has gone up 1.25 percent in that time. The Fed has suggested there may be more rate hikes in 2018.

Interest on bank accounts

If interest rates are going up, it stands to reason that will be good for consumers with money in the bank. Shouldn't they expect to earn more interest -- which has been near zero percent in recent years -- on their deposits?

"Interest rates paid on deposits are not getting back to normal so much as establishing the new normal," McBride said. "And even then, you have to go out and search for it, it's not going to land in your lap."

That's because there aren't uniform increases in rates on deposits among all banks. McBride says consumers will find that online banks, community banks, and credit unions will have the best rates. The large national and regional banks will pay a lot less.

"There's a big difference between what the top yielders are paying and what the average bank is paying," he said. "You really have to shop around."

The Fed's decision to boost its key interest rate appears to be in response to continued signs of increased economic growth. Policymakers have set a goal of keeping inflation at no more than two percent.

Boosting rates is one tool for keeping wages and prices from rising too quickly. Neither have shown signs of doing so, however, and inflation remains below two percent.

The Federal Reserve Open Market Committee has voted to raise its key interest rate .25 percent, the third rate hike this year.That puts the fed's disco...

Article Image

Most credit card users rack up debt to meet basic expenses

A new survey of consumers who carry chronic balances on their credit cards shows much of their spending is on basic daily needs–making ends meet.

The research from credit card site CompareCards.com found 42 percent of consumers in the survey group reported their shortage of cash at the end of the month was a significant driver in running up debt.

Aside from gasoline and groceries, consumers reported that emergency expenses such as car repairs and medical care went on credit cards because money was not available.

Bruce McClary, a vice president at the National Foundation for Credit Counseling, which represents non-profit credit counselors, says the survey should raise some warning flags.

'Disturbing'

"What I find disturbing about this survey is that it shows consumers are rolling over more than $5,000 in balances from month to month, coupled with the fact that much of that debt–some 42 percent–is related to simply making ends meet, covering expenses that would ordinarily have been covered using cash," McClary told ConsumerAffairs.

The survey focused on reasons for credit card debt and the stress that it causes among consumers. Millennials are more likely than older consumers to feel stress, yet baby boomers are having a harder time than millennials paying off their debt.

Also disturbing, the survey found about 28 percent of consumers had two or more credit cards with a balance they can't pay off in full.

"We are clearly in a trend where more people are falling behind on their credit card payments and people are carrying larger balances," McClary said. "That combination can be very dangerous."

The survey can be subject to different interpretations. Despite a soaring stock market and improving job market, a sizable group of consumers may still be struggling financially.

At the same time, McClary says some consumers with job security may have become too comfortable with debt over the last few years and are now in over their heads. He says it's easy to do.

Long term costs

"Consumers should think about the long term costs of the things they're buying on credit, he said. "If their credit card is simply charging them the average interest rate, which right now is around 16 percent, you can be adding a lot to the cost of the item you're buying."

McClary cites the example of carrying a $1,000 balance and paying the minimum $25 a month at 16 percent APR. At that rate, he says consumers would pay an additional $400 by the time they paid off the balance.

It might be difficult, but McClary says consumers struggling with credit card debt can turn it around.

"In my 20 years of non-profit credit counseling I have always found that there is the possibility of finding room in the budget for savings," McClary said. It's just a matter of where you look and how hard you're willing to work to make those adjustments."

For help, he suggests contacting a non-profit credit counselor. While some consumers may have little or no discretionary spending that can be cut, a credit counselor can suggest tactical moves that can save money on existing financial obligations.

A new survey of consumers who carry chronic balances on their credit cards shows much of their spending is on basic daily needs–making ends meet.The re...

Article Image

Credit score requirements for renters getting higher, study finds

The average credit score of approved rental applicants in the U.S. is getting higher, a new analysis from apartment search website RENTcafe suggests.

Renters who applied and were approved for an apartment in 2014 had an average credit score of 638, while those who applied and were approved in 2017 had an average score of 650. However, credit score requirements are even steeper for those trying to rent in high-end buildings.

In 2017, tenants approved to rent an apartment in a Class A building had an average credit score of 683;in Class B buildings, the average score was 647. Meanwhile, low-end buildings like Class C and D accepted renters with average scores of 624.

Highest average credit scores

Some markets have higher credit requirements compared to others, according to the research. In Boston, where renters pay north of $3,000 per month, tenants have an average credit score of 737 -- the highest among the 50 U.S. cities studied in the analysis.

San Francisco has the second-highest renter credit scores in the country, where renters have an average score of 724. Those renting in Seattle, Wash. had the third-highest average scores at 711.

Varies by location

But high credit score requirements aren’t only found in pricey rental markets. Even cities with less expensive apartments have high credit standards, the study found.

In Minneapolis, Minn., renters have an average credit score of 711 -- the same as those in Seattle. As market competition drives up the cost of renting in some cities, many buildings now have higher credit score requirements.

Another example is Oakland, Calif., where the average credit score for those renting an apartment soared to 707 in 2017. Renters in Philadelphia, Pa. also had average scores in the 700s.

“Basically it is an issue of competition. As there are more applicants than properties in many markets, landlords can increase the requirements of hurdles applicants need to meet,” financial expert Peter Neeves told ConsumerAffairs.

“Increasing competition in tight real estate markets can result not only in higher rents, but also in more stringent rental standards. This can be seen by landlords requiring higher credit scores or other new or increased burdens on applicants,” Neeves said.

Interestingly, those accepted to lease an apartment in New York -- the most expensive rental market in the U.S. -- had very “average” credit scores of 654.

The top cities where applicants can get by with relatively low credit scores are Las Vegas, Memphis, Tenn., Milwaukee, Wis., Mesa, Ariz., and Arlington, Texas.

The average credit score of approved rental applicants in the U.S. is getting higher, a new analysis from apartment search website RENTcafe suggests.Re...

Article Image

Uber targets millennials with new credit card

After making strong gains among millennials, Uber has introduced a credit card rewarding the kinds of purchases millennials tend to make. The card's cash-back rewards are unusually generous, according to credit card experts.

The Uber Visa card, available November 2, pays four percent cash back on restaurant purchases, three percent on hotel and airfare, two percent on online purchases (including Uber rides), and one percent on everything else. The card does not charge an annual fee or foreign transaction fees, and customers can redeem rewards for Uber credits, gift cards, or cash.

The card also features an annual subscription credit that can be used on services like Spotify, Netflix, or an Amazon Prime membership. Included in the cardholder agreement is coverage for mobile phone theft or damage.

Targeting millennials

Nerdwallet credit card expert Kimberly Palmer points out that consumers previously had to choose between the Chase Sapphire Reserve or American Express Platinum cards to receive comparable rewards. However, both cards carried hefty annual fees.

“To directly target millennial consumers, the Uber Visa lets cardholders redeem rewards in Uber rides or UberEATS orders straight from the apps, in addition to getting cash back or gift cards,” Palmer tells ConsumerAffairs.

“If you’re a frequent Uber customer who wants to avoid annual fees without foregoing perks like Spotify, Netflix, and Amazon Prime subscription credits, the Uber Visa is definitely worth considering.”

Uber trending upward

For Uber to target millennials with a new credit card might not seem that surprising when you consider the ridesharing company has made big inroads among that group lately.

When YouGovBrandIndex recently looked at companies favored by millennials, it found Uber led all brands with the biggest gains. Uber's share of millennial customers rose eight percent to 26 percent of all millennials in the first half of 2017. Rival Lyft, meanwhile, gained six percent for a marketshare of 12 percent.

Among the brands favored by millennial consumers, Uber made the biggest gains in the first half of this year, followed by Instagram, Lyft, Snapchat, and TLC.

After making strong gains among millennials, Uber has introduced a credit card rewarding the kinds of purchases millennials tend to make. The card's cash-b...

Article Image

An emergency savings fund can start with a modest amount

Saving for a down payment on a house is a worthy goal. So is putting money away for retirement.

But the first goal for any consumer should be saving up enough money to meet an emergency expense like a car repair, appliance replacement, or medical bill. Having an emergency savings account not only provides peace of mind, it can help prevent a growing credit card balance with a very high interest rate.

Unfortunately, many consumers are struggling to put any money into savings, and instead are living paycheck-to-paycheck. A recent survey shows more than half of consumers don't have as much as $1,000 in a savings account.

Allie Vered, Director of America Saves, a non-profit that tries to motivate consumers to save money, has drilled down into the numbers and doesn't like what she sees.

Spending habits and worrisome statistics

"What's worrisome to me is that 42% of women have nothing saved, versus 28% for men,” Vered told ConsumerAffairs. “When you look all the way through, from emergency savings to retirement savings, women consistently save less."

Part of that could be because men still earn more than women. But over time, that gap appears to widen.

"Females only make 82% of what males make upon graduation, but 10 years later women are making 69%," Vered said.

Vered says Millennials also seem to have more difficulty saving. Coming of age during the 2008 financial crisis, they tend to be thrifty but are burdened with student loans.

“They have whole different sets of challenges with managing income and savings that we don't really understand," she said.

Consumers today generally spend a larger percentage of their income than they did in the past, in part because society encourages it. As young people, the World War II generation was encouraged to be thrifty because there was war-time rationing. There were a limited number of consumer products to buy and this generation carried that thriftiness through life.

Today's consumer culture encourages people to spend money. Vered says technology also plays a role.

"Spending habits are being driven, in part, by social pressure that hasn't been there in the past,” she said. “You can show your wealth, and more broadly, to different audiences via social media. That, it turn, can create pressure to have misplaced priorities."

First steps toward saving

To get on the path to proper savings priorities, the personal finance experts at the American Bankers Association recommend “paying yourself” before you pay any of your bills. That means making a regular deposit, no matter how small, into a savings account.

The best way to do that is automating it, using your online bill pay account to move money from your checking account to a savings account each month. If you wait until the end of the month to see how much money you have left for savings, chances are there won't be any.

Next separate your spending into two categories – wants and needs. Look at the things you need to spend money on – things like the rent or mortgage, the utility bill, insurance, etc.

Then look at the spending in the “want” category. It not only includes dinners out and impulse buys, it might also include cable TV and smartphones.

There are increasingly more ways to “cut the cord” with cable by watching more content online at less cost. And while you probably think you can't part with your smartphone, you might be able to spend less on a phone and a service plan if you just shop around.

Freedom from financial worry

Finally, don't feel like you have to get to $1,000 in your emergency saving account overnight. The point is to build a modest amount into your budget so that you don't really notice.

If your budget is tight, start with $25 a month. You can increase it slightly as you pay off debt and find ways to trim spending.

“This small goal can lead to a lifetime of practice,” Vered said. “Saving isn't an amount, it's an activity that you build into so that you can get to your goals.”

And reaching goals is a big part of America Saves' mission. While some people find gratification in spending money, there is also gratification in saving it.

For one thing, it brings freedom from financial worry, making it a little easier to sleep at night.

Saving for a down payment on a house is a worthy goal. So is putting money away for retirement.But the first goal for any consumer should be saving up...

Article Image

Consumers piled on credit card debt in second quarter

Consumers are putting more spending on credit cards, which is fine if it's paid off in a reasonable timeframe. But when the balances are allowed to grow, that can be trouble.

The folks at personal finance site WalletHub keep track of consumers' credit card habits and report we all did a pretty good job of paying down balances during the first three months of the year. After a record-setting year debt-wise, we paid off more than $30 billion in the first quarter.

But in the second quarter, the plastic came out of our wallets again. WalletHub reports consumers charged $33 billion in new debt.

"So it’s not a question of whether consumers are weakening financially, but rather how long this trend toward pre-recession habits will last and just how bad it will get," the authors write.

$60 billion in new debt

The report projects consumers will end up adding more than $60 billion in new credit card debt by the end of the year, pushing the total well past the $1 trillion level. This is a problem for three reasons.

First, a lot of credit card purchases are for things that aren't lasting -- things like meals in restaurants or vacations. When these bills are not paid off completely and allowed to build up, you're spending today's and tomorrow's money for things you consumed yesterday.

Second, debt cuts into your monthly cash flow so that you don't have as much money in your budget. If you are making $250 minimum payments on your credit card bill, you can't spend that $250 on things you need this month and you aren't making much progress on paying off your balance.

That brings us to the third problem: the interest rate is-sky high. The average interest rate is over 16% and will go even higher if the Federal Reserve continues to hike interest rates.

Staying out of trouble

The best way not to get in trouble with your credit card is to pay off the balance in full when the bill arrives. That way you aren't adding to your total. If you don't think you can pay for everything in one month, don't charge as much.

From time to time you might take two or three months to pay for a major purchase, like a new water heater, but make sure you pay for all the smaller purchases, plus a portion of your major expenses, with your monthly payments until the balance is back at zero.

If you are already in trouble and struggling to pay off your credit card balance, apply for a balance transfer credit card with a generous introductory period in which you pay 0% interest. If you can avoid double-digit interest for a year or more, then 100% of your monthly payment goes against the balance.

Just make sure you continue to pay for all your monthly purchases -- plus a payment on the balance -- each month.

Consumers are putting more spending on credit cards, which is fine if it's paid off in a reasonable timeframe. But when the balances are allowed to grow, t...

Article Image

Two co-branded credit cards for consumers to consider

Rewards credit cards are increasingly popular with consumers, which is the reason we have seen so many of them hitting the market in recent months. This week, two new cards launched targeting specific groups of consumers.

One is a co-branded Navy Federal American Express Card. The Navy Federal More Rewards American Express Card is available to Navy Federal Credit Union members and offers three times the points at supermarkets and gas stations, double points at restaurants, and single points on all other purchases.

The new card does not carry an annual fee, nor does it change fees on foreign transaction or balance transfers. There is no limit on the rewards that can be earned and the rewards never expire.

Matt Freeman, head of credit card products at Navy Federal Credit Union, said the rewards are structured to provide the maximum benefit to the average consumer.

“You have to buy groceries, you’re going to get gas and go out to eat—now you can also benefit from earning additional points when you do,” Freeman said.

Freeman said the timing of the card's launch is no accident. He says members can accrue rich rewards just by using the card to do their holiday shopping.

Chase teams with United Airlines

At the same time, Chase and United Airlines have teamed up on a new travel rewards credit card, the United Travel Bank Card. The card pays 2% in TravelBank cash per $1 spent on United tickets. It pays 1.5% per $1 spent on all other purchases. As an additional bonus for travelers, you can get 25% back on purchases of food and beverages aboard United flights.

Kimberly Palmer, credit cards expert at personal finance site NerdWallet, says the card may be attractive to United's frequent fliers.

"The card has no annual or foreign transaction fees, offers 2% back on United purchases, and $150 signup bonus if you spend $1,000," she said. "The card’s TravelBank cash makes it feel like a traditional cash-back card, but allows consumers to easily spend those dollars on United purchases without dealing with confusing point structures."

Palmer says premium cards like the Chase Sapphire Reserve and American Express Platinum are probably better fits for more frequent travelers, but the United TravelBank Card is a "good choice for United travelers looking for a bit more bang for their buck."

Rewards credit cards are increasingly popular with consumers, which is the reason we have seen so many of them hitting the market in recent months. This we...

Article Image

American Express introduces mobile payment system

If you've got an American Express credit card in your wallet, you may have a new way to pay for things.

Actually, two ways. The financial services company is rolling out Pay It Plan It, a mobile payment system that will work with eligible American Express accounts.

Pay It allows cardholders to use their American Express App to immediately pay for smaller purchases, in full, with a single tap. Plan It allows users to set up monthly payments for purchases over $100, over 24 months at a fixed fee and no interest.

Consumers can also continue to pay their bill each month the way they normally do, either in full or by making payments. Either way, they continue to rack up rewards and build credit.

The personal loan model

Matt Schulz, CreditCards.com's senior industry analyst, says the new payment system is highly transparent and credit card companies may soon be taking a cue from the retail banking industry.

"This move is clearly geared toward Millennials who have been drawn to the simplicity and transparency of personal loans," Shultz said in an email to ConsumerAffairs. "Banks desperately want to have them as customers. If this move is successful in earning American Express more business from Millennials, you can bet that other big card issuers will follow suit."

The big difference between the new payment system and a regular credit card is the difference between interest and a fee. Shultz says they may work out to being the same amount of money, but that's not the point.

"Whether they pay a little more or a little less than they otherwise would, customers simply want to better understand what they're getting into," he said.

Could help credit score

Shultz says the Pay It feature may also be helpful in raising your credit score. By facilitating multiple payments within a cycle, you keep your credit utilization down, a key step in improving your credit rating.

In fact, Kartik Mani, head of Global Consumer Lending at American Express, says the system was inspired by American Express members who like to make multiple payments throughout the month. The app, he says, just makes it easier.

If you've got an American Express credit card in your wallet, you may have a new way to pay for things.Actually, two ways. The financial services compa...

Article Image

Best credit cards and bank accounts for students

College students are headed back to campus and most probably have a credit card in their wallet.

For many, the college years provide an introduction to the use of credit, and using it wisely can prevent racking up expensive debt and maybe even damaging their credit standing.

Picking the right card can help, according to card comparison site CreditCards.com. It picks the Discover It Chrome for students card as the top choice for students going back to school this fall.

It's a rewards card, paying 2% cash back at restaurants and gas stations and 1% on everything else. There are no foreign transaction fees and, for the first time you're late making a payment, there's no late charge.

Helpful resources

The card also earns high marks for Discover's Credit Cards 101 feature, an online resource answering many novice card users' frequently asked questions.

Another good choice is the Bank of America Cash Rewards card for students. You get 3% cash back on gasoline, 2% on groceries, and 1% on everything else.

It also provides a $150 sign-up bonus if you spend $500 in the first three months the account is active. It also provides student-tailored credit tools to help card users better manage credit.

The editors at personal finance site WalletHub agree that a student credit card is a useful introduction to credit. It says the first step toward becoming a savvy credit user is to pick the right card.

What to look for

Students should look for generous rewards, 0% intro interest rates, and low fees. Because of the increased competition in the credit card space, there are plenty that fit into that category.

The site ranks cards based on different categories. It says students should pick the card that best matches their spending patterns.

It agrees with CreditCards.com that the Bank of America Cash Rewards card for students is a good choice for consumers primarily purchasing gas and groceries. It also has a 15 month introductory period of 0% on purchases, which is helpful for buying books and paying for them over a period of a few months.

But in the "everyday cash back" category, WalletHub selects the Journey Student Rewards card from Capital One. There is no annual fee and the card pays 1.25% cash back on every purchase.

Besides a credit card, most college students open bank accounts. WalletHub says students should choose one that fits their needs and charges the fewest fees.

In that category, it ranks the Northpointe Bank UltimateAccount as best overall. The bank is based in Grand Rapids, Mich., but allows anyone to open an online account. There's no monthly fee and you can get up to $10 reimbursement for ATM fees each month.

College students are headed back to campus and most probably have a credit card in their wallet.For many, the college years provide an introduction to...

Article Image

American Express pays redress to Spanish-language customers

American Express is paying $96 million in redress to Spanish-speaking consumers in Puerto Rico, the U.S. Virgin Islands, and elsewhere as part of an agreement with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB).

The bureau said that two American Express banking subsidiaries discriminated against the Spanish-language consumers by providing them with credit and charge card terms that were inferior to those available in the 50 states.

“Consumer financial protections are not confined within the 50 states,” said CFPB Director Richard Cordray. “American Express discriminated against consumers in Puerto Rico and the U.S. territories by providing them with less-favorable financial products and services."

Cordray said that no civil penalties were being assessed because American Express discovered the problem, reported it, and "fully cooperated" with the CFPB's investigation.

Over the course of at least ten years, more than 200,000 consumers were harmed by American Express’ discriminatory practices, which included charging higher interest rates, imposing stricter credit cutoffs, and providing less debt forgiveness, the CFPB said.

American Express has already paid approximately $95 million in consumer redress and today’s order requires it to pay at least another $1 million to fully compensate harmed consumers.

The full text of the CFPB’s consent order is available here.

American Express is paying $96 million in redress to Spanish-speaking consumers in Puerto Rico, the U.S. Virgin Islands, and elsewhere as part of an agreem...

Article Image

J.D. Power: great time to be a credit card customer

There's growing competition among banks and credit card companies to sign up new customers, and they're rolling out one incentive after another.

As a result, J.D. Power and Associates reports it's a really good time to be a credit card customer.

“Overall satisfaction is up across the board, and growing numbers of card companies and regional banks are coming to the market with new products that offer rich sign-up bonuses, increased cash-back rewards and new benefits," said Jim Miller, senior director of the banking practice at J.D. Power.

Signing up new customers is only part of the challenge, Miller says. Companies also have to keep those new customers satisfied, which will discourage attrition and encourage increased card use. That all works to consumers' benefit.

Cash back is king

Among the key findings in J.D. Power's customer satisfaction survey, consumers like cash back over all other types of perks and rewards. While scores were higher for all credit cards, they were higher for those that pay cash back.

Interestingly, airline cards and store-branded Visa/MasterCard rewards credit cards had the lowest levels of satisfaction among rewards cards.

The survey also found regional banks are making strong headway in the credit card marketplace. Active accounts for regional bank cards have risen 24% since the end of 2014. Satisfaction with these cards is on par with cards from large national banks, the study found.

The study also found a pronounced age breakdown. Consumers over 40 years old are becoming increasingly satisfied with their rewards cards while those under 40 are becoming less happy with their cards. The survey didn't suggest a reason for that, but noted that younger consumers are more likely to spread spending across more than one credit card.

Favorite cards

According to the report, consumers are most satisfied with American Express branded credit cards, followed by Discover and Capital One.

When selecting a cash back card, it's always a good idea to select one that rewards the kinds of spending you do most. For example, if you buy a lot of groceries, try to select a card that pays the most for supermarket spending.

And pay attention to fees. Paying an annual fee could cut deeply into any cash back rewards you might get. There are plenty of attractive cash back rewards cards that don't charge an annual fee.

There's growing competition among banks and credit card companies to sign up new customers, and they're rolling out one incentive after another.As a re...

Article Image

Lenders making fewer subprime loans

For the first time since 2012, lenders are making fewer subprime loans, according to a new report from TransUnion, one of the three credit reporting agencies.

Subprime loans are those made to consumers with lower credit scores and usually carry less-favorable terms than prime loans. In most cases they carry higher interest rates and may have other disadvantages.

The TransUnion report found 4.63 million consumers received a subprime auto loan or lease, personal loan, or credit card in the first quarter of this year. That compares to 4.89 million in the first quarter of 2016.

“Across product lines, we saw a decline in subprime originations at the beginning of 2017, and for the first time in a number of years we observed this for consecutive quarters,” said Ezra Becker, senior vice president of research and consulting for TransUnion.

Played a role in the financial crisis

Subprime mortgages played a major role in the financial crisis of 2008. Millions of consumers who could not really afford to buy a home were able to do so with subprime mortgages that had very low interest rates to start, but quickly rose to unaffordable levels. It created a wave of foreclosures that threatened to bring down the financial system.

“Immediately following the recession, many lenders pulled back on subprime originations to control delinquency, Becker said. "As the economy recovered, lenders loosened their underwriting standards and allowed more subprime consumers greater access to credit."

Now, says Becker, that trend may be changing. It's not clear, however, why it's happening. It could be a case of lenders turning down more consumers with challenged credit, or it could be a case of fewer consumers with low credit scores are attempting to borrow money.

Big drop in personal loans

The biggest decline can in subprime personal loan origination, which dropped 10.6% year-over-year. It was an abrupt reversal since, in the first quarter of 2016, subprime personal loans surged 11%.

There was also a nearly 9% drop in subprime auto loans, after that sector had propelled a recent growth in auto sales. Subprime credit card origination dropped by a much smaller amount, 1.8%.

Becker says a combination of factors may be discouraging subprime lending. After years of growth in subprime auto lending, he says lenders may be concerned about an uptick in auto loan delinquency.

For consumers, getting out of the subprime category will not only improve chances of loan approval, it will also gain more favorable loan terms. Heather Battison, vice president of consumer communications for TransUnion, advises consumers to focus on improving their credit. Paying your bills on time, she says, is a good place to start.

For the first time since 2012, lenders are making fewer subprime loans, according to a new report from TransUnion, one of the three credit reporting agenci...

Article Image

Credit cards with the most and fewest fees

A report by card comparison site CreditCards.com has found the average credit card carries six potential fees, which can make a consumer's purchase a little more costly.

The good news is there are fewer fees than there used to be. The credit card industry has gotten a lot more competitive and issuers have found reducing fees can make their products a lot more attractive to consumers.

The study measured "potential" fees, meaning consumers may be able to avoid some or all of them. That makes selecting a card and reading the fine print increasingly important.

A dozen potential fees

The analysis found that the First Premier Bank credit card has the most fees at 12, while the Pentagon Federal Credit Union Promise Visa has the fewest potential fees -- just one.

If you're late making a payment, you're very likely to be charged a late fee, regardless of the card you use. Most cards also charge a fee for taking a cash advance.

Both are costly. Being late paying your bill can cost $37 or more while the typical fee for a cash advance is either $10 or 5% of the loan, whichever is greater.

Balance transfer fees

Again, a large majority of cards -- 85% -- charge a fee for transferring a balance. If you need to transfer a balance to a card with an introductory no-interest period, finding a card that doesn't charge that fee will save you about 3% of the transferred balance.

About half the cards in the study charge a foreign transaction fee, usually 3% of the purchase. You don't have to travel outside the country to be charged this fee. If you make an online purchase from a foreign company, you'll pay the foreign transaction fee if your card charges it.

"The good news is that all of these fees can be avoided with smart financial habits and the most common fees are among the easiest to dodge," said Matt Schulz, CreditCards.com's senior industry analyst. "I recommend setting up automatic payments, refraining from using credit cards at ATMs and shredding convenience checks."

The most and the least

According to the CreditCards.com study, the cards with the most potential fees are:

  • First Premier Bank credit card (12)
  • BankAmericard Secured card (11)
  • Blue Sky from American Express (10)
  • Hilton HHonors card from American Express (10)
  • Key Bank's Key2More Rewards (10)
  • Meijer MasterCard (10)
  • PNC Points Visa (10)

Here are the cards with the fewest fees, according to CreditCards.com:

  • Pentagon Federal Credit Union Promise Visa (1)
  • Capital One Platinum (2)
  • Capital One Secured MasterCard (2)
  • Capital One Spark Cash Select for Business (2)
  • Journey Student Rewards from Capital One (2)
  • Sam's Club MasterCard (2)
  • SonyCard Visa from Capital One (2)
  • Spark Classic from Capital One (2)
  • Spark Miles Select by Capital One (2)

Just like you would choose a rewards credit card based on the type of spending you do, consideration should also be given to the fees a card may charge, and how your use or spending behavior may affect them.

A report by card comparison site CreditCards.com has found the average credit card carries six potential fees, which can make a consumer's purchase a littl...

Article Image

U.S. News ranks the best travel rewards programs

More consumers are traveling thanks to an improving economy, and many are taking advantage of credit card and travel industry loyalty programs that reward that travel.

Choosing the right card or plan usually depends on the kinds of travel you do, but U.S. News and World Report has highlighted what it deems the best programs for everyday travelers.

Marriott Rewards took top honors in the Best Hotel Rewards Programs category, scoring points for its ease of earning points, as well as its large network of hotels in popular destinations. Among the perks is complimentary Wi-Fi access and the ability to use points for tickets to sporting events and concerts.

Wyndham Rewards is second in the rankings, largely for the ease of earning a free night, as well as discounts on room rates and the ability to rack up points by using two different credit cards.

Rewards in the sky

Alaska Airlines Mileage Plan was named the Best Airline Rewards Program, an honor it claimed in 2015 and 2016. U.S. News credits its mileage-based earning structure with making it easier for travelers to earn miles at a faster pace than other plans based on spending.

Delta SkyMiles came in second, cited for its competitive redemption rates for award flights and wide range of benefits. Members can use their miles for hotel stays, cabin upgrades, event tickets, and even free flights.

"Today's travelers have so many rewards programs to choose from, comparing and contrasting them based on your specific needs can be a challenge," said Christine Smith, associate travel editor at U.S. News. "Our Best Travel Rewards Programs rankings emphasize the ease of earning points and miles, and redeeming them for free nights and flights, which everyday travelers identify as a top reason to join a loyalty program."

Targeting Millennial travelers

Fareportal, operators of the CheapOair.com (an Authorized Partner) and OneTravel.com (an Authorized Partner) travel booking sites, is expanding its travel rewards program with an eye toward winning over Millennials. The company says it wants to do the same thing American Airlines did in the 1980s, winning the loyalty of Baby Boomers with its AAdvantage Program, which launched in 1981.

The company describes its plan as "multi-faceted," seeking to reward users twice and even three times. It says members earn points not only through the CheapOair (an Authorized Partner) and OneTravel (an Authorized Partner) loyalty program, but also with the company's co-branded credit cards, as well as the consumer's own airline programs.

"All travelers, whether frequent flyers or occasional vacationers, want a flexible loyalty rewards program that they can use based on their own individual travel habits," said Sam Jain, founder and CEO of Fareportal. "In order to be inclusive of all of our customers, we not only allow them to get free rooms if enough points have been accumulated, but also to reduce the cost of a room with the amount of points they do have."

To go along with its travel rewards plan, Fareportal introduced co-branded credit cards with Synchrony Financial late last year. The two cards have no annual fee and new customers are eligible for a $50 statement credit after making purchases of $500 or more within the first 90 days of getting the card.

More consumers are traveling thanks to an improving economy, and many are taking advantage of credit card and travel industry loyalty programs that reward...

Article Image

A credit card that rewards you for paying your bill

Credit card companies generally like for you to carry a balance. After all, they may be charging anywhere from 12% to 25% interest, so they stand to make more money.

But the Citi Double Cash Rewards card takes a different approach. It actually rewards you for paying off your balance.

Let's say you make a $1000 purchase on the account. If you pay off the entire amount when the bill arrives, you earn 2% cash back. If you only pay off part of the purchase, you earn 1%, though you can eventually earn the other 1% once you pay off the purchase completely.

"It's just a simple set-it-and-forget it card that fits into most anyone's busy lifestyle," said CreditCards.com senior industry analyst Matt Schulz. "There's no minimum spending threshold to meet, no rotating categories to chase. It's just 2% on anything you buy, anywhere and anytime you buy it. That's a tough combination to beat."

0% interest

Also making this Citi card an attractive choice is its generous introductory period of no interest on purchases or balance transfers. It offers 15 months of 0% interest on both, as long as you complete the balance transfer in the first four months the account is active. On balance transfers, there is a fee of $5 or 3%, whichever is greater.

Another nice feature is that there is no annual fee. It's one reason CreditCards.com selected it as the best no annual fee card of the summer of 2017.

Placing second in the rankings is the Discover It Miles card. This travel card offers unlimited 1.5 miles for every dollar spent on all purchases – everything from airfare and hotels to groceries and online purchases.

At the end of the first year of account activity, Discover says it will match miles on a one-to-one basis, so that if customers have racked up 30,000 miles, that will automatically turn into 60,000 miles. Discover says there are no blackout dates and the miles never expire.

Credit card companies generally like for you to carry a balance. After all, they may be charging anywhere from 12% to 25% interest, so they stand to make m...

Article Image

Discover adds security features to its credit cards

The credit card industry is getting more competitive, with companies providing more services and rewards. Consumers stand to benefit.

For example, Discover has just begun a new program that will alert cardholders if their Social Security number shows up on a black market website, or when new accounts are opened on their Experian credit report.

The company will monitor so-called "dark web" websites that normally traffic in stolen data used to steal identities. If a cardholder's Social Security shows up on one of these sites, the customer will get an immediate alert.

Julie Loeger, Discover’s executive vice president and chief marketing officer, says the new services fall in line with the company's core mission.

'Raising the bar'

“We’re raising the bar even higher by offering these new alerts for free to our cardmembers," she said. "It’s our way of looking out for our customers beyond just their Discover accounts.”

A Social Security number is the key piece of data a thief needs to establish bogus credit accounts in a victim's name. And its theft may be much more widespread than anyone would ever guess.

In 2015, NPR reported that government agencies don't track this kind of statistic, but an expert from Verizon says that 60% to 80% of all Social Security numbers have, at one time or another, fallen into the hands of people not authorized to have them.

Discover says that if it finds a cardmember's Social Security number on a risky website, or if a new credit account shows up on the customer's Experian credit report, that customer will get an email alert or optional text.

Customer support

If the customer doesn't know what to do, Discover says he or she may call a Discover customer service agent to learn the steps to resolve the issue.

“Knowing is the first step toward preventing or resolving identity theft or fraud," Loeger said. "That’s why our new alerts are intended to make sure our cardmembers are in the know when their identities might be at risk.”

Discover says identity fraud cases rose 16% last year to reach a record 15.4 million victims. It cites research which shows nearly half of all U.S. consumers think their personal information is less safe than it was five years ago.

The credit card industry is getting more competitive, with companies providing more services and rewards. Consumers stand to benefit.For example, Disco...

Article Image

Things you should know about credit

Consumers generally understand the importance of credit scores and how they can impact significant areas of your financial life.

But the latest survey from TransUnion, one of the three credit reporting bureaus, has identified several important misconceptions about credit and credit scores.

For example, closing a credit card account does not automatically lower your credit score. It might, but it all depends on the amount of credit you have available to you and the length of the credit history on the account.

If you fear you have become a victim of fraud, it is possible to lock your credit accounts, but you have to lock each one separately. There is no one tool that will lock your TransUnion, Equifax, and Experian accounts at the same time.

Your marital status has no bearing whatsoever on your credit standing. This is apparently a widespread misconception because the TransUnion survey found that 44% of consumers believe it does.

Another misconception is that a low credit score could reduce your ability to travel outside the United States. It doesn't, but nearly a third of consumers believe it to be true.

Checking your own score doesn't hurt

If you apply for credit and the lender checks your credit account, it will result in a slight and temporary lowering of your score. But if you check your own credit, it has no effect. In fact, TransUnion says regular credit monitoring is encouraged for identity theft protection.

Your credit report will factor in prompt bill payment but not all monthly payments are included. Your payment record for your utility bill may be a factor, but it might not. TransUnion says not all utility companies report on-time payments and delinquencies, though most do.

TransUnion says the average VantageScore in the U.S. is around 645, suggesting consumers need more information about credit and how to manage it.

More credit education

“Making credit education accessible for all consumers is one of our top priorities,” said Heather Battison, a TransUnion vice president. “In general Americans should invest more time and energy into managing their credit."

Battison says it is important for consumers with less-than-excellent credit work on raising their credit scores. The best way to do that is with timely repayment of financial obligations. Even small bills, if not paid on time, can drag down a credit score.

Consumers generally understand the importance of credit scores and how they can impact significant areas of your financial life.But the latest survey f...

Article Image

Cash won't be king if Visa has its way

Visa would like for everyone to stop using cash and is putting its money where its mouth is. The credit card company is offering thousands of dollars to small merchants if they agree to stop taking cash.

It's not as outlandish as it sounds. Obviously, Visa comes out ahead if more people use credit cards, but many small businesspeople would be better off too. Most obviously, eliminating cash pretty much does away with the problem of hold-ups. It also stops employees from pilfering a few dollars here and there and reduces bookkeeping chores. (It makes life easier for the tax collector too, but maybe we'd better not mention that). 

So why haven't merchants already gone cashless? One problem is the expense. It requires upgraded point-of-sale and backroom equipment to go completely cash-free, which is why Visa is offering to pay $10,000 each to as many as 50 restaurants and food vendors.

The "journey to cashless," as Visa is calling it, wouldn't restrict all sales to credit and debit cards. "No-contact" payment forms like Apple Pay would also qualify for the program.

“At Visa, we believe you can be everywhere you want to be, and that it should be easy to pay and be paid in more ways than ever – whether it’s a phone, card, wearable or other device,” said Jack Forestell, Visa's head of global merchant solutions.

Visa says that if the experiment with the first 50 works out, it may extend the program. Merchants will be able to apply starting later this month.

Visa would like for everyone to stop using cash and is putting its money where its mouth is. The credit card company is offering thousands of dollars to sm...

Article Image

Consumer bureau issues rule restoring right to file class actions

Arbitration clauses imposed by banks and credit card companies have in recent years blocked consumers from pursuing their day in court through class actions and other legal means. Today the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau took steps to restore consumers' rights.

It issued a rule that bans companies from using the aribtration clauses to deny consumers their day in court through class actions, lawsuits that represent large groups of people with the same problem.

"Arbitration clauses in contracts for products like bank accounts and credit cards make it nearly impossible for people to take companies to court when things go wrong," said CFPB Director Richard Cordray. "These clauses allow companies to avoid accountability by blocking group lawsuits and forcing people to go it alone or give up. Our new rule will stop companies from sidestepping the courts and ensure that people who are harmed together can take action together."

Consumer groups hailed the action, saying that "fine print" clauses have for too long deprived consumers of their rights.

"Rip-off clauses"

“Rip-off clauses in the fine print of consumer contracts may be the single most important way that big banks and financial companies have escaped accountability for cheating, conning, fleecing, defrauding and plundering consumers,” said Robert Weissman, president of Public Citizen.

“If consumers can’t join together to hold banks accountable through class-action lawsuits, then the banks’ appetite for swindling will know no bounds, as we have seen repeatedly. Today’s action by the CFPB is of paramount importance.”

While the arbitration clauses can block any lawsuit, companies almost exclusively use them to block class action lawsuits, the CFPB noted. With class action lawsuits, a few consumers can pursue relief on behalf of everyone who has been harmed by a company’s practices.

Lisa Donner, executive director of Americans for Financial Reform, said corporations have used arbitration clauses as a "get-out-of-jail-free card for lawbreakers.”  

“The consumer agency's rule will stop Wall Street and predatory lenders from ripping people off with impunity, and make markets fairer and safer for ordinary Americans,” Donner said. She cited Wells Fargo's use of aribtration clauses, which allegedly enabled the bank to hide its misconduct for years. 

"Ignored its own research"

Financial interests were less pleased. 

“We are disappointed the CFPB has ignored its own research and gone forth with a rule which will not only harm the prepaid industry, but will more critically deprive consumers of an efficient, inexpensive, and convenient manner to resolve disputes," said Brian Tate, CEO of the Network Branded Prepaid Card Association. 

"According to the bureau’s own research, arbitration has proven to be a faster and more affordable alternative to class action litigation, which doesn’t always benefit consumers and is not always available for all claims," Tate said.

The CFPB, however, said that nearly all mandatory arbitration clauses force each harmed consumer to pursue individual claims against the company, no matter how many consumers are injured by the same conduct. But individual consumers almost never spend the time or money to pursue formal claims when the amounts at stake are small, the bureau said.

The CFPB cited its study released in March 2015 which found that credit card issuers representing more than half of all credit card debt and banks representing 44 percent of insured deposits used mandatory arbitration clauses. Yet three out of four consumers the Bureau surveyed did not know whether their credit card agreement had an arbitration clause.

The 2015 study also found that the arbitration clauses:

  • Deny consumers their day in court: The study showed that few consumers ever bring – or consider bringing – individual actions against their financial service providers either in court or in arbitration. Only about 2 percent of consumers with credit cards surveyed said they would consult an attorney or consider formal legal action to resolve a small-dollar dispute. As a result, the real effect of mandatory arbitration clauses is to insulate companies from most legal proceedings altogether.
  • Avoid paying out big refunds: Individual actions get less overall relief for consumers than group lawsuits because companies do not have to provide relief to everyone harmed. According to the study, group lawsuits succeed in bringing hundreds of millions of dollars in relief to millions of consumers each year.
  • Continue harmful practices: Individual actions might recoup previous individual losses, but they do nothing to stop the harm from happening again or to others. Resolving group lawsuits often requires companies to not only pay everyone back, but also change their conduct moving forward.

Public Citizen's Weissman said politicians should take note of today's action and support it.

"Elected officials from both major parties – almost all of whom have condemned the Wells Fargo and other egregious financial abuses – should embrace [the CFPB rule]. Those who denounce it should prepare to face the wrath of consumers fed up with widespread financial scams and shams.”

Arbitration clauses imposed by banks and credit card companies have in recent years blocked consumers from pursuing their day in court through class action...

Article Image

Safe ways to cut credit card debt and rebuild credit scores

Economists trying to figure out why the economy isn't growing any faster may be overlooking a couple of obvious factors.

Consumers are paying on $1.3 trillion in student loan debt and another $1 trillion in credit card debt. That takes a big bite out of millions of consumers' disposable income.

Helene Raynaud is CEO of Guidewell Financial Solutions, a non-profit credit counselor in Maryland. She says that credit card number is particularly troubling since credit card interest rates are on the rise.

"If interest rates rise again this year, these consumers may find themselves struggling to make ends meet," she said.

Get out of debt safely

Raynaud says there are three steps consumers can take to begin to safely get out of debt, and build up their credit scores at the same time. The first is to seek help and advice from a non-profit credit counselor.

The process is fairly simple. The counselor, who charges a very small fee, helps clients review their income, expenses and debt.

After an assessment, the two sides work together to establish a household budget. Just a small decrease in spending can help, and a small increase in income helps even more. Once a household isn't living paycheck to paycheck, it reduces the stress level. Any extra money can be divided between savings and increased debt reduction.

Rebuilding credit

A second step is to use non-profit tools to rebuild credit, which may have become damaged by mounting debt. Raynaud recommends a program like the one offered by non-profit Credit Building Nation.

The tool, called Save 2 Build, is simple. The consumer receives a loan for $300, which is locked away in a savings account where he or she can't access it. The consumer then makes payments of $26 a month on the loan, with each payment reported to the three credit bureaus.

Once the $300 loan is repaid, the consumer gets access to the $300, which can then be used to establish a secured credit card, enabling the credit-building process to continue. An improved credit score carries many financial benefits, including a lower credit card rate and in most states a lower car insurance rate.

Use caution with credit repair

Finally, Raynaud says a for-profit credit repair company may be able to provide further help, though she advises caution is selecting a company. She notes the Federal Trade Commission has said there are reputable companies in this business, but they really can only do things consumers can do for themselves.

These companies can take the time you might not have to deal with credit reporting agencies to remove inaccurate information from your credit report. But she stresses that if the negative information is accurate, it cannot be removed by anyone.

Economists trying to figure out why the economy isn't growing any faster may be overlooking a couple of obvious factors.Consumers are paying on $1.3 tr...

Article Image

Credit report policy change may raise your score

Congratulations, your credit score may go up this weekend, and you didn't have to do a thing.

On July 1, all three credit reporting bureaus -- TransUnion, Equifax and Experian – are establishing a set of policy changes that will almost certainly raise millions of credit scores. The policy change requires more information, as well as more frequent updates. The credit bureaus expect that will mean all civil judgments and about half of all tax liens will disappear from consumers' credit reports.

In a report, personal finance site WalletHub dug deeper into what it all means. First, there are likely to be fewer credit report errors.

Starting Saturday, records of civil judgments and tax liens that go into credit reports must have the individual's name, address, and Social Security number. In addition, the information must be updated every 90 days.

Fewer errors

Very often a consumer's credit score is dragged lower because his or her report contains negative information that belongs to someone else. This change is designed to reduce that likelihood. If you fit into this category, the WalletHub report predicts your Vantage Score will rise an average of 10 points and your FICO Score will go up an average of 20 points.

"Every piece of negative information that falls off your credit reports is good for your credit score," the authors write. "So we definitely recommend reviewing your credit reports on a regular basis, both to confirm the removal of problematic public records and to make sure no other mistakes wind up costing you money."

The reason this is important is civil judgments and tax leins make a lender less likely to loan you money, or reduces the amount they are willing to lend. A civil judgment means you've lost a lawsuit and have to pay the plaintiff, meaning you have less income. A tax lien tells a lender that you have to pay the government back before you pay anyone else.

The report estimates that as many as 9% of consumers with a credit report will see their credit scores rise as a result of the policy change.

Other ways to raise your score

If you want to raise your credit score, here are some other steps to take:

  • Pay every bill on time, every month. This simple step provides more bang for the buck than anything else you can do.
  • Reduce the amount of debt you have in relation to available credit. That means if you have a credit card with a $5,000 credit limit and you are carrying a $4,500 balance, your score will rise if you can pay down the balance to $2,500.
  • Be careful about opening new credit accounts. When you add a credit account, it can lower your score, at least temporarily.

Congratulations, your credit score may go up this weekend, and you didn't have to do a thing.On July 1, all three credit reporting bureaus -- TransUnio...

Article Image

Best credit cards for renting a car this summer

With summer travel season in full swing, more people are stepping up to the rental car counter and paying for their ride with a credit card.

But the credit card they choose to rent a vehicle with can make a big difference.

Personal finance site WalletHub recently studied the most popular credit cards, looking for any advantages they might offer on car rentals. For example, most cards provide some kind of damage insurance coverage, but some coverage is better than others.

In many cases, using the right credit card will allow you to decline the rental car company's damage waiver, which can be expensive -- especially since you pay by the day. A credit card's insurance covers much the same thing as the damage waiver -- damage to the rental car. Neither provide liability coverage, which should fall under your auto insurance policy.

Citibank comes out on top

You get the most insurance coverage, according to the WalletHub report, with the cards issued by Citibank. You don't have to sign up, but you do have to decline the rental car company's damage waiver.

The Citibank cards cover costs that stem from damage to or theft of rental vehicles up to $100,000. Citi is followed in the rankings by credit cards from Chase, Barclaycard, USAA, and Capital One.

It's important to read the fine print on your credit card agreement, however. Some cards that offer good rental car coverage don't offer it on all types of vehicles. If you are renting a truck, any type of open-bed vehicle, an exotic or antique car, a large van, or even a full-size SUV, there will likely be exclusions to coverage. In that case you may need to accept the rental company's damage waiver policy.

Most coverage is for a limited time

When it comes to vehicle exclusions, WalletHub says Citibank cards are the best while American Express excludes the most types of vehicles. The report finds 39% of cards only provide coverage for vehicles rented in the U.S. for up to 15 days. If your rental is for a longer period, you'll need to make other arrangements.

While coverage outside the U.S. is rare, WalletHub says all Citi, Chase, and Discover cards provide global coverage.

To make sure you are covered under your credit card's rental car protection, make sure you decline the rental car company's damage waiver and be the primary renter of the car. That usually means you are the only authorized to operate it.

Also, pay for the car in full with the credit card providing the protection. As a failsafe measure, it might be a good idea to contact your credit card company and ask it to send you its rental car policy, so that you fully understand what's covered and what's not.

With summer travel season in full swing, more people are stepping up to the rental car counter and paying for their ride with a credit card.But the cre...

Article Image

Complaints about banks on the rise

Banks have changed a lot over the last couple of decades, and not all of those changes are winning approval from consumers who use them.

An analysis of financial services complaints, lodged with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB), shows the number of complaints in certain areas of banking services surged last year.

Consumerprotect.com focused on complaints about six banking services – bank accounts, consumer loans, credit cards, credit reporting, mortgages, and student loans. It found that for five out of the six, the number of complaints filed last year represented the majority of complaints since CFPB started collecting them.

A spike in frustration

In other words, consumer frustration with banking services appeared to spike in 2016. Nearly 36% of all complaints about student loans and credit reporting were filed last year.

The rate of complaints about mortgage services actually went down in 2016. Despite that, mortgages still account for the largest percentage of overall complaints about banking services – 30%. Complaints about student loans, which surged last year, only make up 3.9% of the total complaints about banking services.

At ConsumerAffairs, frustrated consumers also post accounts of their unhappy experiences with banks, especially in the area of student loans. Linda, of Hyde Park, N.Y., writes that she and her husband paid off their son's college loan with Wells Fargo, only to be presented with a bill for $2,000 in interest charges they say accrued after the loan was paid.

Paying twice

Jon, of Pittsburgh, writes that he was making a student loan payment to Citibank over the phone when the call dropped. He said he called back and explained to another rep what had happened and asked for assurance that his payment would not be entered twice.

“Of course it did come out twice and now I'm all screwed up with other payments that are going to clear my bank account,” Jon wrote. “I called and another rep who said they can't reverse the charges for 20 days because within 20 days my bank has the authority to dispute the charge. That costs me $30.”

What's behind the recent surge in complaints about banking services? The report's authors suggest it could be the changing nature of banks.

“In a quest for higher profits, many have looked to acquire other banks and reduce or limit services to meet their investors’ needs,” the authors write.  

Banks have changed a lot over the last couple of decades, and not all of those changes are winning approval from consumers who use them.An analysis of...

Article Image

Who makes use of your credit score?

An annual survey of consumers shows more people are getting access to their credit scores each year, but understanding of why that score is so important is declining.

The survey, by the Consumer Federation of America (CFA) and VantageScore Solutions, shows access to credit scores rose from 49% in 2014 to 56% this year. That part is encouraging.

But when asked who besides a lender makes use of that score, there has been a steady decline in knowledge of other users. For example, fewer consumers this year knew that a cellphone company accesses your credit score when you open an account. So do electric utilities, but awareness of that fact is also on the decline.

Who else checks your credit score? Pay TV providers do, along with many other businesses that charge a monthly subscription fee.

Impact on car insurance rates

In all but three states, car insurance companies check your credit score when they assign you a car insurance rate. They justify the practice by saying insurance risk is higher for consumers with a low credit score.

CFA Executive Director Stephen Brobeck says the fact that more consumers are checking their credit scores on a regular basis, but have less knowledge about how that score works for or against them, is puzzling.

“One would think that increasing access to one’s credit scores would help increase knowledge about these scores,” Brobeck said. “But that apparently has not been the case, to the detriment of consumers. Low credit scores can cost consumers hundreds, and sometimes thousands, of dollars a year in higher loan and service costs.”

What you don't know can cost you

For example, did you realize that a low credit score can increase loan charges by more than $5,000 on a typical car loan? Or that you might even have more than one credit score?

The survey showed declining knowledge in those areas, and that fewer than half of those in the survey knew credit repair agencies are rarely helpful in improving a credit score.

There was a definite bright spot in the survey, however. More consumers know the correct ways to improve a credit score. Ninety-one percent knew that missing a loan payment lowers your credit score. Eight-six percent also knew that high credit card balances will also drag down a score.

CFA and VantageScore have set up an interactive credit score quiz website at www.CreditScoreQuiz.org to help consumers better understand credit scores. 

An annual survey of consumers shows more people are getting access to their credit scores each year, but understanding of why that score is so important is...

Article Image

Fed hikes interest rates amid record high credit card rates

The Federal Reserve is hiking its key interest rate again, a move that was widely expected.

Normally the Fed hikes rates only when inflation is building and the economy is overheating, but there's no sign of that happening right now.

Instead, the main reason the Fed is hiking rates is to get them back somewhere close to normal. They were near 0% for years after the financial crisis.

The nation's economy is no longer in crisis mode, but it's only growing at about 2% a year. Wednesday's hike will only bring this key interest rate back to between 1% and 1.25%.

Credit card rates will go up

Unfortunately, the rising Federal Funds Rate almost always puts upward pressure on the interest rate consumers pay on credit card balances. That rate was already at a record high before the Fed's rate hike.

In its weekly report, CreditCards.com put the average credit card interest rate at 15.89%. Six months ago, the average rate on 100 widely-used credit cards was 15.2%.

The biggest change was among cash back rewards cards. The average rate in that category moved from 15.99% to 16.09%.

$1.5 billion in extra charges

Personal finance site WalletHub predicts the 25-basis point increase in the Federal Funds Rate will cost credit card users roughly $1.5 billion in extra finance charges during the rest of the year. Factoring in the three previous rate hikes, the WalletHub editors say consumers carrying a credit card balance will end up paying around $6 billion more in 2017 than they would have otherwise.

For consumers paying on a balance, that could make a bad situation worse. Experts predict total outstanding credit card balances will be over $1 trillion by the time 2017 draws to a close.

The Fed's rate hike will have less of an impact on auto loans and almost no effect on mortgage rates, which are tied closely to the yield on the Treasury Department's 10-year note.

The Federal Reserve is hiking its key interest rate again, a move that was widely expected.Normally the Fed hikes rates only when inflation is building...

Article Image

The difference between 'deferred-interest' and '0% interest'

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) is urging retailers to clear up some confusion surrounding store credit card promotions.

Specifically, the agency called for more transparency when retailers make promotional offers like “no interest for 90 days,” which is essentially a “deferred interest” promotion. The consumer who makes a purchase with the store's card pays no interest if they pay off the entire balance within the set time limit, such as 90 days.

But if they fail to pay off the entire balance in the prescribed time period, they are then charged the full interest on the purchase, which can blindside consumers who didn't understand the terms of the promotion.

Letters to retailers

The CFPB has fired off letters to major retailers asking them to consider more transparent promotions, like 0% interest during the introductory period. A number of credit card issuers take that approach, not charging interest for the first 12 to 21 months the account is open, if certain conditions are met, such as making a purchase during the first 60 days.

“With its back-end pricing, deferred interest can make the potential costs to consumers more confusing and less transparent,” said CFPB Director Richard Cordray. “We encourage companies to consider more straightforward credit promotions that are less risky for consumers.”

CFPB says one major retailer recently took that step, announcing it will drop its deferred-interest promotions in favor of a promotional period with 0% interest, much like the credit card companies offer. With that approach, consumers don't get hit with unexpected interest charges if they haven't paid off the balance by the time the promotional period ends.

How to tell the difference

How can you tell a deferred-interest promotion from a 0% interest one? CFPB cautions consumers to look for the word “if.” When an offer says “No interest if paid in full in 12 months,” that's a deferred-interest pitch. Escaping interest charges is fully conditional upon paying off the balance in the allotted time.

On the other hand, 0% interest offers say something like “0% intro APR on purchases for 12 months.” That means you are only on the hook for interest charges for the amount of the unpaid balance at the end of 12 months. It's a much better deal.

The problem is that consumers often confuse the two types of offers because they sound similar. The CFPB says the number of purchases using deferred-interest promotions jumped 21% between 2010 and 2013.

For consumers making a major purchase at a retailer whose store card only offers a deferred-interest promotion, consider this option: apply for a credit card, such as the Citi Diamond Preferred, that offers a lengthy introductory period at 0% interest, and purchase with that card instead.

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) is urging retailers to clear up some confusion surrounding store credit card promotions.Specifically, t...

Article Image

Credit card debt closing in on $1 trillion

A few years ago total student loan debt in the U.S. topped the $1 trillion mark, causing many economists to express concern. Now, a new report from the Federal Reserve shows total credit card debt is rapidly closing in on that milestone.

Overall, the Fed reported that total consumer credit increased in April at a seasonally adjusted rate of 2.5%. Of that total, revolving credit, which includes credit card debt, increased 1.8%.

In breaking down the data, personal finance site WalletHub found that consumers repaid more than $31 billion of their credit card debt in the first quarter, a big improvement over last year. Still, it was below the average first quarter pay-down since the Great Recession, and could be cause for concern.

The stepped-up pay-down came on the heels of a huge run-up in credit card bills last year, so there was a lot to pay off – and a lot still unpaid. Crunching the numbers further, the WalletHub editors project that U.S. consumers will add some $60 billion in new credit card debt in 2017, ending the year with a total balance over the $1 trillion mark.

Cautionary flag

Here's why the WalletHub editors are raising a cautionary flag: last year consumers started the year with a very weak pay-down of credit card debt. It finished the year by adding post-2007 records for new debt in the second, third, and fourth quarters.

“So it is not a question of whether consumers are weakening financially, but rather how long this trend toward pre-recession habits will last and just how bad it will get,” the editors write. “And WalletHub projects that we will end 2017 with more than $60 billion in new credit card debt. That would mean we’d owe well over $1 trillion in credit card debt overall.”

And credit card debt is very expensive debt. The average rate on credit card balances is currently at a record high of 15.83%. While this poses challenges for the economy, it also can put individual households in a bind, limiting their ability to make other purchases.

Credit card management tips

If you are struggling to pay off credit card debt, here are some tips that might make the process more manageable:

  • Make a budget and stick to it. Use any eliminated expenses to pay down credit card balances faster
  • If you can manage to save some money each month, put it toward an emergency fund. It may take a while to build it up, but it can provide a way to pay for an unexpected expense, instead of putting it on plastic.
  • If you have marginal credit, work on improving it. The best way to do that is to pay every bill on time. As your credit score rises, you may be able to qualify for a balance transfer card offering a lengthy introductory 0% interest rate period.
  • If you have more than one credit card balance, work on paying off the highest interest account first.

A few years ago total student loan debt in the U.S. topped the $1 trillion mark, causing many economists to express concern. Now, a new report from the Fed...

Article Image

Should you store your credit card information online?

When you make an online purchase, many retailers will give you the option of storing your credit card information in their network.

If you make frequent purchases from that particular retailer, there is no question that it's convenient not to have to re-enter those numbers every time. But how safe is your data?

"There's no denying the convenience of online shopping; you don't even have to put on pants to make a purchase," said CreditCards.com senior industry analyst Matt Schulz. "However, saving your payment information online not only increases the likelihood of making unnecessary impulse purchases, it can also leave your data vulnerable to hackers."

The experts at personal finance site Nerdwallet agree. They say you should assume that anything you store online could be vulnerable to a determined hacker.

"We’ve seen countless examples of data breaches. If paperwork related to national security has found its way onto the internet, your credit card information could end up there, too.," they write.

The internet is full of risks

Even if you don't store your credit card data on a retailer's website, just entering it on the internet is risky enough, experts say. For example, making a credit card purchase in an airport or coffee shop with a public Wi-Fi is much less secure than making it at home on your password-protected network.

The retailer's website also needs robust security. To make sure it does, check the URL of the page where you are instructed to enter your credit card information. The address in the browser should begin with "https" and not just "http." You should also see a padlock icon in the right corner.

A report from Creditcards.com found 94 million U.S. consumers store their credit card information online for future use. Fourteen million say they "always" save their credit card data when given the option to do so.

Older consumers, who tend to make fewer online purchases, appear to be the most inclined to save their credit card data. Gen Xers and Baby Boomers tend to be the most leery about the practice. Two out of five say they never agree to save their credit card information on a retailers website.

When you make an online purchase, many retailers will give you the option of storing your credit card information in their network.If you make frequent...

Article Image

Three out of four consumers live with financial regret, survey finds

Have you ever made a purchase or financial decision that you later went on to regret? A new report suggests that if you have, then you’re certainly not alone.

In a recent Bankrate.com survey, nearly three out of every four consumers admitted that they lived with financial regret. The most common regret was not saving for retirement early enough. That was followed by not saving enough for emergency expenses, taking on too much credit card debt, and taking on too much student loan debt.

“The burden of saving for retirement has shifted in recent years from employers to individuals. As a result, many Americans have either been unable or unwilling to save sufficiently for retirement,” says Bankrate.com senior economic analyst Mark Hamrick.

Start saving early

The report shows that Baby Boomers are the most likely consumers to regret not saving for retirement early enough, with the findings showing that regret over this decision increased over time from age 18 to 62. Hamrick says the best way for younger and middle-aged consumers to avoid this kind of financial regret is to start saving early and to take advantage of any available savings incentives.

“As with any savings effort, planning for retirement can be viewed under the banner of paying yourself first. If you are a full-time employee, try to take advantage to the fullest extent possible participation in a 401(k) plan,” he said.

“Retirement is all about cash flow. In my mind, it doesn’t matter what your income is. It doesn’t matter what your portfolio size is. It really all boils down to habits: having a plan, being frugal, making sure that you have a debt reduction plan,” adds Bill Losey, owner and president of a retirement solutions business in Greenwich, New York.

Showing improvement

While the report shows that many Americans are living with financial regrets, experts point out that there has been some recent improvement.

Bankrate points out that the Financial Security Index currently sits at 104.0, a reading which indicates improved financial security relative to the previous year. It was the eighth consecutive month of positive readings, with experts noting year-over-year improvement in five categories -- job security, comfort level with savings, comfort level with debt, net worth, and overall financial situation.

The survey also found that women are feeling more comfortable than men when it comes to their savings for the first time in nearly a year. It’s a point that may boil down to better saving practices.

“I’ve never met a person who regretted saving money. Better to decide now in favor of aggressive saving rather than wait too long to begin and be sorry later,” said Hamrick.

The full Bankrate report can be viewed here.

Have you ever made a purchase or financial decision that you later went on to regret? A new report suggests that if you have, then you’re certainly not alo...

Article Image

Consumer debt reaches record high in first quarter

Household debt reached a record high in the first quarter as consumers increased their use of all kinds of credit, but for the most part did a little better job of keeping up with the payments.

That's one of the takeaways from the Quarterly Report on Household Debt and Credit, issued by the New York Federal Reserve. For consumers, it provides a snapshot of how we're doing financially.

One of the facts that immediately jumps out from the report is the total first quarter debt total of $12.73 trillion, with the Fed noting it's higher than the total debt reached in 2008. Whenever that year is used as a benchmark, it's noteworthy because that was the year of the financial crisis, when the economy teetered over the edge of a cliff.

But the report's authors point out that it has taken nine years for total consumer debt to surpass that peak. That, they say, is an unusually long time.

Different from 2008

Donghoon Lee, Research Officer at the New York Fed, says the composition of that debt today is very different from 2008, when a lot of it was made up by subprime mortgages. And, he says the consumers who are holding that debt look different than they did nine years ago.

“This record debt level is neither a reason to celebrate nor a cause for alarm," Lee said. "But it does provide an opportune moment to consider debt performance.”

That is, how are consumers managing their debt? There, the results are mixed. While mortgage delinquencies are down -- a big change from 2008 -- the delinquency rates on credit cards, auto loans, and student loans are trending higher.

Student loan debt

Student loan debt is particularly troubling. In its analysis of the Fed report, Bloomberg News presents a sobering statistic; in 2003 student loan debt made up just 3.3% of the typical U.S. household debt. Now, it's 10.6%.

Worse still, consumers with student loans are having more difficulty making the payments. The percentage of severely delinquent -- loans that are at least 90 days behind -- is more than three times the delinquency rate on all household debt.

Mortgage delinquencies increased a small amount, perhaps a reflection that mortgage balances increased during the period. At the same time, credit scores of new borrowers increased, suggesting banks are being more careful about making loans.

For credit cards, balances declined slightly after a huge run-up last year but delinquencies increased, along with credit limits -- perhaps a trend to keep an eye on.

But on the whole, the Fed's report suggests, at least for now, consumers are handling their increasing debt loan. Bankruptcy notations hit an 18-year low.

Household debt reached a record high in the first quarter as consumers increased their use of all kinds of credit, but for the most part did a little bette...

Article Image

More research stresses financial compatibility in relationships

It's become very clear since the financial crisis a decade ago that financial stability is very important in a romantic relationship. Study after study finds couples want a mate with a solid credit score.

The latest research comes from Bankrate, which found that 42% of people it surveyed said knowledge of someone's credit score would have some influence on their desire to go out with them. Thirteen percent said it would have a major impact while 29% said it would have at least some influence.

Older Millennials are the most likely to have an interest in a potential mate's financial background. Not too surprising, since they are at the age when people start to think about settling down. But bringing up the subject can be a dating challenge.

Dating challenge

"It's probably not a great idea to ask for someone's financial history on the first date," said Mike Cetera, credit card analyst at Bankrate.com. "However, it's better to know if a potential partner has a history of bad financial decisions before the relationship goes too far, especially if you plan on making large purchases together or sharing bank accounts."

The issue has probably taken on added significance since the financial crisis, which impacted careers and put many people at a financial disadvantage. That time period also overlaps with the huge build-up in student loan debt. As a result, a low credit score can be a deal-breaker.

A 2013 survey by a division of Experian found 96% of women listed “financial responsibility” as an important trait in a mate. Ninety-one percent of men found it important.

Toxic for romance

A more recent survey conducted for the National Foundation for Credit Counseling (NFCC) found that large amounts of debt can be toxic for romance. According to the survey, 37% of respondents would not walk down the aisle with someone until their debt was repaid. Ten percent would marry but not help pay the debt while seven percent would take the somewhat extreme action of breaking off the relationship.

As we reported last month, this new interest in financial stability has spawned a new dating site that matches couples based on their credit scores. Members of CreditscoreDating.com fill out personal profiles like anyone else, but in addition to physical descriptions and pet peeves, members are required to post their credit score.

Personal finance guru Suze Orman advises couples to get to know one another's financial orientation very early in the relationship. She calls it “financial intimacy.”

“Financial intimacy is not about contributing the same amount to the joint checking account,” Orman writes on her website. “I am talking about building an understanding and respect for your individual financial personalities and learning how to meld any differences so you are financially in sync.”

It's become very clear since the financial crisis a decade ago that financial stability is very important in a romantic relationship. Study after study fin...

Article Image

What's the best credit card for overseas travel?

Choosing the right credit card is important. After all, some cards are more rewarding than others.

But in addition to how much cash back a card gives you, or how many miles in offers, there are other things to consider. How useful is the card in certain situations? In particular, how useful will it be to you in your specific situations?

For example, one card might be just fine if you never leave the country. But if you travel abroad every once in a while, you might consider a card that takes that into consideration.

Personal finance site WalletHub has compiled a report, comparing 69 of the most popular credit cards on the benefits they extend to international travelers. Among the things the report took into consideration are foreign transactions fees, and whether the card issuer requires notification before the cardholder leaves the U.S.

Top cards

Coming out on top is the Barclaycard Arrival Plus World Elite Mastercard. The card's very name suggests it was designed for travel, and it is.

Close behind are the USAA Visa Signature Card, the Citi Prestige Card, the Citi Thank You Premier, the BankAmericard Travel Rewards Visa Signature Card, and the Merrill Visa Signature Card.

Each of the cards have international-friendly aspects, some of which rate higher than others in the methodology. You can see the complete rankings here.

Key findings

Among the key findings, Barclaycard, USAA and Capital One are the best credit card companies for international travelers. Three of the largest card issuers do not charge a foreign transaction fee.

Two companies -- American Express and Capital One -- are the only card issuers that can automatically detect when you have left the United States, and do not require cardholders to notify them.

Finally, only three of the top 10 card companies will send you a free replacement card if yours is lost or stolen while traveling overseas. Four will send a replacement card, but not for free. Wells Fargo charges as much as $50 for a replacement card. U.S. Bank, Discover, and Capital One do not ship to international addresses, according to the report.

Choosing the right credit card is important. After all, some cards are more rewarding than others.But in addition to how much cash back a card gives yo...

Article Image

Report predicts credit card fraud about to explode

Here's a good reason to carefully guard your credit card information. A new report predicts thieves are stepping up their credit card fraud activities.

The Radial eCommerce Fraud Technology Lab reports what it calls an alarming increase in credit card "testing." That's when criminals who have obtained stolen credit card numbers use them to make small purchases, usually for five dollars or less.

The purpose is to make sure the card is still good. If the transaction goes through, the fraudster knows the card is valid. The purchase is small enough that it doesn't alert the cardholder that there's unauthorized activity.

That then gives the credit card thief the green light to make a big purchase, maybe for several thousand dollars.

Testing up 200%

Radial is concerned because "testing" is up 200% over last year. It concludes that can only mean that credit card thieves are ramping up their activities.

While this mostly affects retailers, consumers have skin in the game as well. In most cases, liability for fraudulent purchases is limited to $50. Still, it's $50 you don't want to have to pay. It also means the inconvenience of having your old credit card cancelled and a new one issued.

If losses rise dramatically for retailers, it will also mean consumers will likely pay higher prices. After all, the businesses have to recoup those losses some way. So it goes without saying consumers have a stake in helping reduce credit card fraud.

It might also get harder to use your credit card to make a transaction. Radial speculates retailers may start using security tools that result in more legitimate purchases being rejected.

Aren't cards supposed to be more secure now?

This is all happening in an environment in which the credit card industry has mostly switched over to EVM chip cards, which are supposed to be much more secure than cards with the magnetic strip. But the National Retail Federation argued from the beginning of the process that chip cards that only required a signature, and not a PIN, would still be vulnerable to fraud.

In November 2015, attorneys general from eight states and the District of Columbia joined retailers in urging banks and credit card companies to add a PIN to card security. The state officials said countries that have implemented the chip and PIN technology have seen a dramatic drop in credit card fraud.

Beware skimmers

Besides having your credit card actually stolen from your wallet, the most likely way a thief will steal your data is from a credit card "skimmer," installed over the top of a legitimate card reader. One of the most likely places to find a skimmer is on a gas pump.

Experts advise consumers using their credit card at a gas pump to look closely at the card reader to see if it looks different. Also, try to move it with your hand. If it's not firmly in place, it could be a skimmer. Believe it or not, these devices are sometimes put in place with cheap glue and double-sided tape.

Here's a good reason to carefully guard your credit card information. A new report predicts thieves are stepping up their credit card fraud activities....

Article Image

How to dispute inaccurate information in your credit report

Now that you've filed your taxes, maybe you should turn your attention to another financial matter. This might be a good time to check your credit reports from the three credit reporting agencies -- Equifax, Experian, and Trans Union.

While checking your credit report will alert you to fraudulent activity on your account, a much more likely event is to discover incorrect information that could lower your credit score.

Under federal law, you are entitled to a free copy of your report each year from all three agencies by going to one source -- www.annualcreditreport.com. Download all three copies and carefully review them.

The reports should contain pretty much the same information, but sometimes one report will contain information not included in the other two. That's fine -- what you are looking for is information that is incorrect, such as having an account 90 days late when it was always paid on time.

The dispute procedure

The procedure for challenging information is pretty similar at all three agencies. Equifax urges consumers to review their credit report each year and file a dispute if something is wrong. There is no charge for that.

Equifax says it will complete its review within 30 days of receiving a dispute. It will contact you with the results using your preferred mode of communication.

If Equifax finds the report contains an error, it will fix it without any further action from the consumer.

The National Foundation for Credit Counseling (NFCC) says not all credit report errors have the same impact -- some may be more consequential than others. It advises consumers to immediately address information in the credit report that clearly belongs to someone else.

Negative information

Also, you need to know the credit limits on your credit cards, because if they are listed as lower than they actually are, it will lower your credit score. Also, look for really old information. In general, negative information more than seven years old must be removed from your credit report.

Under law, if the credit agency determines the information is correct and must stay in the report, consumers may submit a statement of dispute of up to 100 words, explaining the circumstances, which becomes part of the credit report.

Negative information that is true has to stay in the report, in most cases for up to seven years. Unpaid judgments can be reported for seven years or until the statute of limitations runs out, whichever is longer, while some information has no limit on how long it can be reported.

If a company tells you it can remove negative information from your credit report, NFCC says you should watch out. It says these companies generally charge high fees and deliver little that you can't do yourself for free.

Now that you've filed your taxes, maybe you should turn your attention to another financial matter. This might be a good time to check your credit reports...

Article Image

Why the best rewards credit card might be a balance transfer card

You've heard about the proliferation of rewards credit cards and have decided you should get one.

Smart. Rewards cards can be a good way to get a little money back with each purchase. But as you consider your choices, don't overlook a balance transfer card if you have a hefty balance on your current card. It could actually put more money in your pocket.

Here's why: let's suppose you get a cash back rewards card that pays 1.5% on every purchase. That's pretty generous as these rewards cards go.

If you spend an average of $1,000 a month on your card, you'll get $15 a month back. It's a nice little bonus and nothing to sneeze at.

How much are your current credit card payments?

But suppose your current credit card has a $10,000 balance and the interest rate is 16% APR. You're paying around $133 a month, just in interest. Suppose you could eliminate that for a few months?

Many balance transfer cards offer a year or more of a 0% introductory rate if you transfer a balance in the first two to three months. All that money you had been spending on interest is now yours.

Even if you don't use the cards for anything else – and you probably shouldn't as long as you're paying down a balance – you're coming out well ahead. You might be making the same credit card payment each month, but all of it is paying down the balance, when previously only a small portion paid principal and the rest went to the credit card company as interest payments.

Attractive features

Some balance transfer cards also have some attractive features. The Chase Slate Card, which offers 15 months of 0% interest on transferred balances, is one of the few cards that does not charge a 3% fee on the amount of a transferred balance – still more savings.

The Slate Card also lets you check your credit score for free each month and doesn't raise your rate if you're late on a payment.

The Citi Diamond Preferred is another attractive choice because it offers nearly two years – 21 months – of interest free payments, allowing you to stretch out your payments without paying interest.

The only downside is the 3% balance transfer fee. On a $10,000 balance that's $300. Still, it might be worth it when you measure it against savings in interest charges.

Getting both

How about a card that provides 0% interest as well as cash back rewards? They do exist.

The BankAmericard Cash Rewards Card is one. It pays 3% cash back on gasoline, 2% on groceries and wholesale clubs, and 1% on everything else.

It's also a balance transfer card, with 0% interest for the first 12 months the card is active.

The point is, a card doesn't have to put money in your pocket to be rewarding. It can also be rewarding if it doesn't take so much out of your pocket.

You've heard about the proliferation of rewards credit cards and have decided you should get one.Smart. Rewards cards can be a good way to get a little...

Article Image

Are you using your credit card rewards?

In the last decade, credit card companies have stepped up the rewards they offer to cardholders, providing everything from cash back to points toward travel discounts.

Surveys have found consumers like these rewards, and the offers often sway a decision on whether or not to apply for a card.

But once you have a card in your wallet, what do you do with the rewards? A new report by financial website Bankrate.com addressed that question and found 31% of consumers with a rewards card have never redeemed the rewards.

In fact, most of us fall into one of two categories: either we are nearly obsessive about redeeming rewards or we don't do it at all. Bankrate's Robin Saks Frankel says it's hard to figure out.

Not gaining value

"Credit card rewards don't usually gain value over time," Frankel said. "In fact, they're more likely to lose value as companies require more points or miles for the same perks. Your best move is to cash them in regularly."

Bankrate found that when consumers do take advantage of their rewards, nearly half prefer to get cash back. That's actually a very savvy choice.

It might be hard to place a quantitative value on other types of rewards, such as airline miles or hotel points. But cash is money in the bank. It can be accumulated to pay for a purchase or can be applied each month to pay a portion of the bill.

Of all the types of rewards, cash seems like the most useful. Millennials favor it over older consumers by a wide margin.

Airline miles a distant second

The Bankrate report found airline miles were a distant second, with only 17% of consumers opting for this perk. Twelve percent of consumers prefer to get their rewards in the form of gift cards.

One drawback to some of the more generous rewards cards is a sometimes hefty annual fee. With so many other rewards cards available with no fee, it's wise to carefully consider all offers before selecting a card that charges a fee.

"The credit card market is very competitive right now, so if you're not happy with a fee, you can either shop around to find another card that doesn't have one or you can see if the issuer is willing to waive the fee to keep your business," Frankel said.

In fact, as we recently reported, a study found more than 80% of cardholders were able to get an annual fee waived or reduced just by asking.

In the last decade, credit card companies have stepped up the rewards they offer to cardholders, providing everything from cash back to points toward trave...

Article Image

New concerns about growing consumer debt

Consumers are turning to their credit cards once again, and the National Foundation for Credit Counseling (NFCC) warns that isn't a good thing.

The organization cites the 2017 Financial Literacy Survey that found consumers generally have more credit card debt, less in retirement savings, and more concern about their long-term financial stability.

“It is concerning that so many Americans remain in such a fragile financial position after the Great Recession,“ said Susan C. Keating, president and CEO of the NFCC. “Credit card debt is on the rise, and people are not saving for a financially healthy future."

Credit card spending isn't really a problem when the balance is paid in full each month, or carried only for a month or two while it is paid off. But unfortunately, a lot of consumers don't do that.

39% carry a balance

The survey found 39% of adults carry a credit card debt from month to month, up from 36% the year before. Sometimes the balances are small, making them more manageable. But small balances have a way of growing larger. Nearly two in 10 consumers say they carry a monthly balance of $2,500 or more.

Because the Federal Reserve has now begun raising interest rates, the pressure is likely to grow. The average interest rate is already at a record high and will likely go higher as the Fed continues to boost rates for the rest of this year.

Interest rate increases related to the recent Federal Reserve announcement will likely add to the cost of carrying credit card debt, which could increase financial pressures on families who are unable to find extra room in their budget to offset the impact of these changes.

At least consumers are spending less using their credit cards. The survey found 26% of consumers said they were putting less on plastic than the year before. But consumers may be spending less because they're trying to pay down their rising balances.

Other studies

Other studies have raised similar warnings. In February, personal finance site Bankrate.com conducted a survey of consumers and found just 52% had more money in emergency savings than in credit card debt. That's about the same level as last year.

However, 24% of consumers said their total credit card debt is greater than the amount of money they have set aside in savings, up from 22% last year.

At the same time, the monthly S&P/Experian Consumer Credit Default Indices, a report that monitors changes in consumer credit defaults, shows the overall default rate ticked up three basis points from the previous month to 0.92% in January.

Consumers are turning to their credit cards once again, and the National Foundation for Credit Counseling (NFCC) warns that isn't a good thing.The orga...

Article Image

NetSpend settles with FTC for $53 million

Back in November, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) charged NetSpend Corporation – one of the largest providers of prepaid debit cards in the U.S. – with deceiving its customers. The agency said that the company often delayed or denied activation of consumers’ cards or blocked them from accessing their funds.

“Innovative financial products can offer many benefits to consumers. However, when companies promise consumers ‘immediate access’ to their funds, they need to honor those promises. . . We’re committed to protecting consumers – particularly those who are financially strapped – from deceptive practices involving their payment choices,” said FTC Director Jessica Rich at the time.

Now, in an announcement made Friday, the agency said that NetSpend will settle the allegations by paying $53 million. The final order was approved by the Commission in a 2-1 vote.

Deceptive practices

In its original complaint, the FTC noted that NetSpend often marketed its products with terms such as “always available,” “immediate access,” and “use it today.” However, the agency found that many consumers who applied for a prepaid card and put money in their account couldn’t access their funds right away.

Sometimes the lack of access lasted for weeks, or in special cases the consumer was never granted access. Those who tried to close their accounts and requested refunds sometimes had to wait weeks for their money to get back to them, and some found that their funds were spent on company fees.

As a result of these actions, the FTC said that many underbanked consumers who relied on these products were left strapped for cash and extremely vulnerable, with many being evicted from their homes, having their vehicles repossessed, or incurring late fees on bills.

“These delays in access to funds are especially harmful to consumers who have made the NetSpend card their primary means of financial management, leaving them without alternative means of accessing funds,” the complaint stated.

In settling the charges, NetSpend has agreed to pay no less than $53 million in relief to affected consumers who purchased a prepaid card between January 1, 2010 and August 31, 2016. The company has also been barred from advertising, marketing, promoting, or selling any prepaid product in which it misrepresents the key details and conditions.

In a statement also released on Friday, NetSpend continued to deny the allegations, saying that it does “a great deal to encourage card activation and comply with federal law.”

Back in November, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) charged NetSpend Corporation – one of the largest providers of prepaid debit cards in the U.S. – with...

Article Image

Credit card and student loan complaints on the rise

There are plenty of things that consumers like to gripe about, but a recent report shows that credit cards and students loans are taking the brunt of complaints recently.

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) released a report yesterday which analyzed over 1.1 million complaints made across all products as of March 1, 2017. The findings showed that over 116,000 complaints had been made against certain credit cards, and that student loan complaints had shot up dramatically.

“Credit cards are a vital financial tool used daily by more than half of all adults in this country. Consumers deserve clear guidance and need to be able to resolve problems that arise with their cards,” said CFPB Director Richard Cordray.

Credit card woes

The report shows that many consumers complained about fraudulent charges, being billed for charges that they did not initiate or authorize, and identity theft connected to their credit cards. Complainants often stated that an account was opened in their name even after an alert was placed on their credit file.

To make matters worse, those who complained about fraudulent charges said that it was difficult to have the charges removed even after their credit card company had notified them that the matter had been resolved in their favor.

Additionally, consumers made numerous complaints about confusing reward programs. The reports focus on problems connected to taking advantage of card benefits for bonus point programs, miles programs, cash back programs, and travel benefits programs. Other reports claimed that online information differed from what customer service representatives told them.

The CFPB found that the credit card companies most identified with the above problems were Citibank, Capital One, and JPMorgan Chase.

Student loan complaints shoot up

The CFPB also notes that student loan complaints rose dramatically on a year-over-year basis. Officials analyzed the three-month time period between December 2016 and February 2017 and found that the number of complaints rose 429% from the previous year – the most of any product or service.

The volume of student loan complaints differed widely at the state level. The largest increases in complaints occurred in Montana (+53%), Georgia (+53%), and Missouri (+39%) on a year-over-year basis.

The top three student loan providers that were most complained about from October through December 2016 were Equifax, TransUnion, and Experian – though the recent increase in complaints may be connected to the federal lawsuit filed against Navient back in January.  

For more information, the full CFPB report can be found here.

There are plenty of things that consumers like to gripe about, but a recent report shows that credit cards and students loans are taking the brunt of compl...

Article Image

How paying a little extra can reduce your debt faster

Debt can be a crushing burden. Just ask someone with a huge credit card balance or thousands of dollars in student loans.

But what makes debt such a problem is the borrowed money must be repaid, along with interest on the debt. If you make only the minimum credit card payment or the amount due on your mortgage, you'll end up paying thousands of dollars in interest before you ever pay off the balance.

Is there a way to do it faster? Yes, according to the experts at LendingTree, but it requires a little financial sacrifice. You need to pay a little extra on your loan debt each month, meaning you'll have less disposable income.

Interest calculator

But if you do that, the loan balance will go down faster. LendingTree has an interest calculator on its website so you can check out some different payment scenarios.

First, let's look at a $10,000 credit card balance with an interest rate of 15.2% APR, making a minimum payment of $225 a month. It would take you five and a half years to pay it off and cost nearly $5,000 in interest.

Now, add $200 a month to your payment, paying $425. According to the calculator, the time it would take to get the balance to zero is more than cut in half. You would also pay less than $2,000 in interest.

Some people also pay extra on their mortgage each month. It not only pays it off faster, less of each payment goes to interest and more goes against the principal.

Look at a 30-year fixed-rate mortgage for $230,000 at 4.9%, with a monthly payment of $1,230. But suppose you decided to pay an extra $100 dollars a month. Now, you will pay off the mortgage four years earlier and save $35,000 in interest.

Pay it off as fast as possible

"The far better way to deal with debt is to pay it off as quickly as possible," the experts at LendingTree advise. "To do this, you’ll need to spend less, earn more, or ideally both. As you find creative ways to cut back and increase your income, you’ll want to make sure you’re getting the very best interest rate for the debt you do have."

From a financial standpoint, LendingTree says the "avalanche" method of debt repayment, paying off the loans with the highest interest first, regardless of the loan amount. The "snowball" method is where you pay off the debt with the smallest balances first, working up to the largest balances.

Both methods, says LendingTree, are better than the traditional method -- just making the minimum payment.

Debt can be a crushing burden. Just ask someone with a huge credit card balance or thousands of dollars in student loans.But what makes debt such a pro...

Article Image

Will your credit card company waive your late fee?

Consumers hate fees, whether they are levied by a bank or credit card company. Overdraft fees were such a major bone of contention a few years ago that Congress passed legislation to reduce them.

But fees don't always have to be paid. Sometimes, if you ask, a credit card company will waive them. And it happens a lot more than you might think.

CreditCards.com reports its latest research which shows that 87% of consumers who asked a credit card company to waive a late fee were successful. It also found that 69% of the time, if a customer asked a credit card company to lower the interest rate, the answer was "yes."

While it is true that banks and credit card companies depend more on fees than ever these days, it is also true that they are in a very competitive industry. Consumers have lots of options.

Competition works in your favor

In many cases, a credit card company would rather waive a fee once than possibly lose a customer. If a customer has a good credit score, he or she can open a new credit card account and transfer a high interest balance, often getting more than a year of 0% interest. Credit card companies know this.

That said, CreditCards.com found that only 25% of credit card customers ever asked for a waived fee or a lower interest rate. That means consumers are spending money needlessly.

There's even wiggle room when it comes to annual fees. Many rewards credit cards charge as much as $100 or more for the privilege of using their cards. But CreditCards.com found more than half of credit card customers in the U.S. were able to persuade the company to drop the fee altogether. Thirty-one percent were able to negotiate a lower fee.

More power than you realize

"People have far more power with their credit card company than they realize," said Matt Schulz, CreditCards.com's senior industry analyst. "Competition among card issuers is incredibly high these days and customer retention is a priority."

Schulz says you can't be afraid to ask for an exception because, very often, you're likely to get it.

That also holds true for credit limits. Of those customers who simply asked their credit card company to raise the card's credit limit, 89% got what they asked for.

As we have previously reported, this also works in other highly competitive services, such as insurance. If you have been with your insurance carrier for several years, chances are you can get a discount by saying you are shopping for a new policy.

If you are a senior citizen, or getting close to being one, you can get a discount almost anywhere. But, you have to ask for it. Again, surveys show most people don't.

Consumers hate fees, whether they are levied by a bank or credit card company. Overdraft fees were such a major bone of contention a few years ago that Con...

Article Image

Do you have $2,000 to meet an emergency?

The Federal Reserve Bank of New York regularly monitors consumers' access to credit. That's important in the event of an emergency expense.

If you don't have money in a savings account to meet that expense, you need access to credit in order to pay it. The latest report shows fewer consumers are prepared.

The report contains a new feature that suggests the financial condition of many American households is fragile. It measures the probability of needing $2,000 in the next month and the probability of being able to come up with $2,000 if an unexpected need arose within the next month.

The report shows that about a third of consumers are not confident they could come up with $2,000 on short notice, with a growing number pessimistic about their chances of obtaining credit in a pinch.

Falling applications for new credit

In spite of that, the survey showed both application for credit rates and rejection rates declined. But involuntary account closures also rose to their highest level since the Fed began keeping track.

Consumers, it seems, are now less likely to even apply for credit over the next 12 months. The reason? Most said they didn't think they would be approved.

The percentage of consumers too discouraged to even apply for credit over the past 12 months jumped to 7.1%, the highest level since June 2014. And there may be good reason for that feeling. The percentage of consumers who successfully applied for credit over the last 12 months fell to 31.5%, the lowest level since February 2015.

In spite of data showing that consumers piled on record credit card debt in the fourth quarter of last year, fewer consumers applied for new sources of credit. Credit application rates fell from 42.3% in October to 29.9%, the lowest rate since October 2013.

Improving chances of being approved

However, the Fed's figures show that consumers who did apply for credit during that period had a better chance of being accepted, as rejection rates declined.

The only area where consumers increased their attempts to gain new sources of credit was for auto loans. But consumers decreased their applications for new credit cards by nearly four percentage points.

The Federal Reserve Bank of New York regularly monitors consumers' access to credit. That's important in the event of an emergency expense.If you don't...

Article Image

Experian misled consumers about how its credit scores are used, feds charge

Experian has been presented with a $3 million bill from the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB). The agency said Experian has been deceiving consumers about how its credit scores are used.

Experian claimed its credit scores were used by lenders to make credit decisions, but, in fact, lenders did not use Experian’s scores to make those decisions. The CFPB ordered Experian to truthfully represent how its credit scores are used and to pay a civil penalty of $3 million.

“Experian deceived consumers over how the credit scores it marketed and sold were used by lenders,” said CFPB Director Richard Cordray. “Consumers deserve and should expect honest and accurate information about their credit scores, which are central to their financial lives.”

Experian is one of the three largest credit reporting agencies, along with Equifax and TransUnion. All three compile creditworthiness data on consumers but no single credit score is used by every lender despite what is sometimes claimed.

"Educational" score

Some of the companies have developed so-called “educational credit scores,” which lenders rarely, if ever, use. These scores are intended to inform consumers about their financial situation. 

One such "educational" score is Experian's “PLUS Score,” which it sold directly to consumers without clearly stating that it was not used by lenders.

From at least 2012 through 2014, Experian violated the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act by deceiving consumers about the use of the credit scores it sold, the CFPB said.

In its advertising, Experian falsely represented that the credit scores it marketed and provided to consumers were the same scores lenders use to make credit decisions. In fact, lenders did not use the scores Experian sold to consumers, according to the CFPB.

Experian also violated the Fair Credit Reporting Act, which requires a credit reporting company to provide a free credit report once every twelve months and to operate a central source – AnnualCreditReport.com – where consumers can obtain their report. Until March 2014, consumers getting their report through Experian had to view Experian advertisements before they got to the report. This violates the Fair Credit Reporting Act prohibition of such advertising tactics.

Experian has been presented with a $3 million bill from the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB). The agency said Experian has been deceiving consum...

Article Image

What's the best credit card for business use?

If you operate a small business, it's helpful to keep personal and business expenses separate. That's why many business owners have at least two credit cards -- one for business and the other for personal use.

But it pays to give some thought to each one. Some cards will reward personal spending and some are better when it comes to buying things for a business.

To sort them out, card comparison site CreditCards.com has picked what it says are 2017's best business credit cards. It ended up with three top choices.

Chase Ink Business Preferred card

Topping the list is the Chase Ink Business Preferred card. It's new to the lineup, introduced late last year with a generous sign-up bonus and offering lots of points on common expenses.

The authors of the report gave the card high marks for its rewards program and sign-up bonus, which includes 80,000 points after you spend $3,000 in the first three months the card is active. Even though the card carries a $95 annual fee, the authors say the rewards more than cover it.

The card also doles out triple points on a wide range of business-related expenses like shipping, internet, phone, cable, and travel. It even pays three points for every dollar spent on social media and search engine advertising.

Capital One Spark Cash for Business

The Capital One Spark Cash for Business card is another favorite. It provides 2% cash back on every purchase and has a rewards program that is easy to use.

"The card's flat rewards rate saves precious time that business owners might otherwise have to spend learning how to navigate a card's complicated rewards program," the authors write.

"It also offers a relatively generous $500 sign-up bonus for spending $4,500 in the first three months, business-friendly benefits such as free employee cards, downloadable purchase records and no foreign transaction fees."

Starwood Preferred Guest Business card from American Express

Third on the list is the Starwood Preferred Guest Business card from American Express. This is an especially attractive choice if your business requires a lot of travel.

It might lack the number of earning opportunities as other business rewards cards, but CreditCards.com argues that Starpoints are "significantly more valuable" than other credit card rewards points.

Starwood has also increased the value of its points by offering one-to-one transfers with several travel partners. The card hands out a 5,000-point bonus when transferring points. When signing up, cardholders get an extra 25,000 points if they charge $5,000 in the first three months the account is active. If they spend another $3,000 over the following three months, they are rewarded with an additional 10,000 points.

If you operate a small business, it's helpful to keep personal and business expenses separate. That's why many business owners have at least two credit car...

Article Image

What the Fed's second rate hike means for consumers

As expected, the Federal Reserve's Open Market Committee announced Wednesday that it is boosting the Federal Funds Rate for the second time since December. The benchmark rate is now going to be somewhere between 0.75% and 1%.

By historical standards, it's still very low. But since the Fed maintained a near 0% rate for almost a decade, actually charging anything to borrow money is bound to have an impact.

Consumers carrying large balances on credit cards are likely to feel it the most. That's because credit card issuers take their cue from the Federal Funds Rate, and according to CreditCards.com, the average credit card rate is already at a record high 15.51%.

A holding pattern

In its last report, the card comparison site noted that most card issuers spent the last couple of weeks in a holding pattern, apparently waiting for the Fed to act. It reports Citi raised the annual percentage rate (APR) on the Citi Thank You Preferred card a half-point, but it didn't affect the national average. However, consumers applying for the card are now offered an APR ranging anywhere from 13.99% to 23.99%.

The rate charged on credit card balances will affect how quickly consumers are able to pay down those balances. As rates rise, more of the monthly payment goes to pay interest and less goes against principal. To maintain a steady pace of debt reduction, a consumer will need to increase the amount of the payment each month.

Car loans may get more expensive

The interest rates on car loans may go up slightly. Many are pegged to a bank's prime rate, and banks often respond to a Fed rate hike by boosting their prime rate.

Rising interest rates on car loans will make monthly payments a bit more expensive. Consumers are already responding to increasingly expensive new car prices by turning to leases.

The Fed rate hike will have less impact on home mortgage rates. That's because mortgage rates are closely aligned with the rate on Treasury bonds. Those rates have been going up in the last few months, independent of Fed action.

Will consumers with savings accounts finally start earning some interest? Probably not right away, but over time the chances are very good. Rising rates make it more profitable for banks to lend money, so they will need to compete harder to attract your savings. To do that, they'll need to offer more attractive rates on savings products.

As expected, the Federal Reserve's Open Market Committee announced Wednesday that it is boosting the Federal Funds Rate for the second time since December....

Article Image

Consumers racking up record credit card debt

Consumers are spending more and more and putting it on plastic. That's not so bad if they pay it off each month, but a new report says they aren't.

The personal finance site WalletHub.com has issued a report, showing consumers put a record $60.4 billion on their credit cards in the fourth quarter of 2016. The authors of the report say that's "a serious cause for concern."

Here's why: it's the largest increase in fourth quarter credit card debt since 2007, which is when The Great Recession began. It's the third-largest total in the last 30 years.

But what's worse, it ballooned credit card balances. The spending increased net credit card debt in 2016 by $89.2 billion, the largest annual increase -- again -- since 2007.

The report paints the picture of a troubling trend. Consumers added $21.9 billion in new credit card debt during the third quarter last year. That came on the heels of a record second quarter increase in debt of $34.4 billion. Meanwhile, the first quarter of last year saw the smallest pay-down of credit card debt since 2008.

"So it is not a question of whether consumers are weakening financially, but rather how long this trend toward pre-recession habits will last and just how bad it will get," the authors write. "And WalletHub projects that in 2017 we will surpass the current record for outstanding balances by at least $100 billion."

Paying down debt

Consumers who find themselves with growing credit card debt can take steps to reduce it. One of the most efficient steps is to transfer some or all of your high interest balances to a new credit card that provides an introductory period of 0% interest. That means 100% of your payment each month goes to pay down the balance.

If you have a large balance, one of the best cards for a transfer is the Chase Slate. It provides 15 months of interest-free payments and does not charge a balance transfer fee if you make the transfer within 60 days of activating the account.

If you are unable to transfer your balance to an interest-free card, make sure your payments each month are enough to make a real difference. Don't pay just the required minimum -- pay more. Look at your bill and determine the monthly finance charge. Pay that amount, plus as much as you can afford to pay against the balance.

Consumers are spending more and more and putting it on plastic. That's not so bad if they pay it off each month, but a new report says they aren't.The...

Article Image

2017's top balance transfer credit cards

Credit cards come and go and sometimes the terms change, so it's a good idea to keep up to date on the latest offerings.

This year, card comparison site CreditCards.com has declared two cards -- the Citi Diamond Preferred and the Chase Slate -- as the best balance transfer cards.

Cards that allow you to transfer a balance are useful when you are trying to pay down a large credit card debt. In nearly every case, a balance transfer credit card will give you a few months in which you pay no interest.

That means 100% of your payment during that time goes to pay off the balance. When your old card has an interest rate of 15% or higher, that makes a huge difference.

You have to consider the balance transfer fee

Citi earns points because it offers the longest period of 0% interest -- 21 months. But it also charges a balance transfer fee -- not unusual for balance transfer cards. That means the cost of transferring a balance to the Citi card will be either $5 or 3% of the transferred balance, whichever is greater.

That's not a deal-breaker if you are only transferring $1,000. The fee would be just $30. However, if you are transferring $10,000, the fee would be $300.

If you want to transfer a large balance, you should then consider the second card on the list, the Chase Slate. Its 0% introductory period isn't as long, but it's still a respectable 15 months. But the clincher is the balance transfer fee. There isn't one if you make the transfer within 60 days of opening the account.

A third option is the BankAmericard. It provides 18 months of interest-free payments. While it does charge a transfer fee, if you're still carrying a balance after the introductory period expires, the interest rate is 11.49%, which is low for a credit card.

Credit cards come and go and sometimes the terms change, so it's a good idea to keep up to date on the latest offerings.This year, card comparison site...

Article Image

Consumers increasingly turning to personal loans

Consumers are spending and borrowing money again. One way they are doing it is with personal loans.

The personal loan as a credit instrument has been around for decades. It was very common, for example, in the days before everyone carried a credit card.

A personal loan is very different from an auto loan, in that it is only secured by your creditworthiness. With a car loan, the vehicle itself serves as collateral. That's why the interest rate on a car loan is typically much lower than the interest on a personal loan -- the risk to the lender is less.

That makes a personal loan more similar to a credit card, which is also unsecured debt. A personal loan could come in handy, however, if you are faced with an unexpected bill -- often the kinds of emergencies that send people to payday lenders, where the interest rate can be 400% APR or more.

How personal loans are used

Dan Matysik, Vice President of personal loans at Discover, says more consumers are using these loans to consolidate existing high-interest debt.

"Generally, an appropriate use for a personal loan is one which fits within the consumer’s budget and helps them achieve their financial goals," Matysik told ConsumerAffairs. "Regardless of how you plan to use a loan, there are a number of factors to consider when determining what type of loan best fits your needs. "

It starts with determining how much you need to borrow and the timeframe during which you can repay it. Next, Matysik says consumers need to consider the terms of the loan.

"With the loan options currently available, including from Discover, there is no need to pay origination fees, prepayment penalties, or closing fees," Matysik said. "These fees can significantly add to the total cost of the loan, and they can be easily avoided by choosing the right lender."

For example, Matysik says if a lender has a 5% origination fee, a $20,000 personal loan would cost the consumer an extra $1,000.

Check for fees

So, when researching lenders who offer personal loans, consumers should first determine if the loan carries fees and, if so, how much.

The interest rate may be a little lower than what you would pay on your credit card, but that's all going to depend on your credit score. The higher your score, the better your rate.

In selecting a lender, Matysik also says trust should be a big factor.

"Trustworthiness could be gleaned from, among other things, a lender’s stability and transparency in the lending process," he said. "It’s critical to research the lenders you’re considering and make sure they have a reputation for providing an overall positive customer experience."

Consumers are spending and borrowing money again. One way they are doing it is with personal loans.The personal loan as a credit instrument has been ar...

Article Image

American Express adds perks to its Platinum Card

In recent years, consumers have figured out that using a credit card with generous rewards, such as cash back or discounts on travel, could provide real advantages.

Since then, credit card companies have been in a rush to develop new rewards cards to entice these savvy consumers.

Now, American Express is adding what it calls "a new generation of benefits" to its top-tier Platinum Card. Along with the new rewards comes a new annual fee -- $550 a year, up from $450.

$200 in Uber credits

The new benefits, which start March 30, include up to $200 a year in credits for Uber rides in the U.S. and automatic VIP status, where it's available. They also include five times the membership rewards points at eligible hotels, when stays are booked using amextravel.com.

Other travel benefits include access to more American Express and partner lounges at airports around the world, access to a new Global Dining Collection, and more events. The lounge access is being expanded to 1,000, in more than 500 cities and 120 countries.

“Because we’ve built long term relationships with our Platinum Card Members, we have a deep understanding of what they value most about their Membership – access to exclusive experiences, rich travel rewards and superior service,” said Janey Whiteside, senior vice president and general manager of Global Charge Products, Benefits & Services, American Express.

'Exceeding members' expectations'

She said the upgrade to the iconic card is being made to “ensure that we’re continually exceeding our Card Members’ expectations.” The Wall Street Journal notes that the enhancement may help American Express better compete with Chase's new Sapphire Reserve Card, which still has a $450 annual fee. Both cards are targeted at consumers who travel a lot and spend enough so that the rewards more than pay for the fee.

American Express said it added the Uber benefit because its research has shown its customers are frequent users of the ride-sharing service. The Uber benefit will be doled out at $15 a month, with an additional $20 credit in December. To get the fee, consumers must use their American Express card as the payment method in the Uber app.

With a $550 annual fee, consumers obviously must think long and hard about whether such a rewards card is a good fit. It might well be, but if you do little travel, there may be less expensive rewards cards -- and cards without an annual fee -- that make more sense.

In recent years, consumers have figured out that using a credit card with generous rewards, such as cash back or discounts on travel, could provide real ad...

Article Image

Credit Sesame offers new credit card pre-qualification tool

Applying for the right credit card is important. Not only do you need to select a card that best matches your spending patterns, offering rewards for what you spend most on, it's important to find a match to your credit worthiness.

This is where some consumers run astray. They see an ad, or maybe even get a credit card solicitation in the mail, and apply, thinking they'll be approved. They may be disappointed if they're turned down and not really understand why.

Credit Sesame, a personal finance company, has launched a service that pre-qualifies consumers for credit cards that are issued by Capital One. The company says it saves time and maybe even prevents a ding to their credit rating if they apply for a card and don't get it.

Company CEO Adrian Nazari says the system was developed using technology from the Capital One developer platform. When a member logs on, he or she is presented with the Capital One cards that best align with their credit ratings and goals.

Narrows the offering for each member

Some cards are targeted at people with excellent credit. Some are designed for people with only fair credit scores. Nazari says the pre-qualification service narrows the scope for each individual consumer, making it an easier decision.

For credit cards from issuers other than Capital One, consumers can still productively narrow their focus by just looking at the cards designed for particular creditworthiness.

Credit Sesame, as well as most other credit card comparison sites like CreditCards.com, and WalletHub.com, break down credit card offers by credit ranking.

FICO score breakdowns

For example, if your FICO score is 740 to 850, you have excellent credit and should apply for a card in that category. Currently, some of the offerings include the Chase Sapphire Preferred Card, which provides 50,000 bonus points if you spend $4,000 the first three months the card is active.

If your FICO score is between 640 and 739, you have good credit. In that category, the Discover It Card is a popular choice, providing 5% cash back on rotating categories.

FICO scores of 650 to 699 put you in the fair credit category. The Chase Slate Card is popular in that category, especially if you want to transfer a balance from another high-interest card.

There is no transfer fee on balances transferred within 60 days of opening the account and there is no interest for 15 months.

Applying for the right credit card is important. Not only do you need to select a card that best matches your spending patterns, offering rewards for what...

Article Image

Credit card defaults continue to rise

One measure of how consumers are doing financially is how they are handling their debt.

On the heels of a report showing a rising credit card default rate in December, consumers appeared to slip behind on all their debt payments last month.

The monthly S&P/Experian Consumer Credit Default Indices, a report that monitors changes in consumer credit defaults, shows the overall default rate ticked up three basis points from the previous month to 0.92% in January.

But it's the bank card default rate that's the headline number. It rose 26 basis points from December to 3.21%. That suggests consumers were having a harder time making their credit card payments on time in the aftermath of the holidays.

Other debt defaults rise more slowly

At the same time, defaults on car loans rose slightly from the previous month to 1.06%. Defaults on first mortgages rose even less, to a default rate of 0.72%.

The five U.S. cities monitored each month all saw increases in debt defaults last month, with Miami experiencing the largest hike, up 14 basis points to 1.67%. That puts it at a 31-month high.

Dallas and Los Angeles both saw their composite rates rise eight basis points, but remain well under 1%. Chicago's default rate is just over 1%, and New York's is just under. Both cities saw slight increases last month.

What's behind the increase? Part of the answer may be that consumers are taking on more debt. As loan volumes rise, so does the likelihood that some borrowers will default. But David Blitzer, managing director and chairman of the index committee, says the credit card numbers bear watching.

"While consumer credit default rates on mortgages and auto loans remain low and stable, default rates on bank cards have popped up to the highest level seen since July 2013," Blitzer said.

Not too worried

But overall, Blitzer says the current consumer debt default levels are not flashing economic warnings. He notes that during the two years between 2004 and 2006, when the economy was fairly strong, bank card defaults were higher than they are today.

"Recent data point to consumer optimism: retail sales rose 5.5% in January 2017 compared to a year earlier, consumer sentiment measures rose over the last two years, and employment and labor market conditions are favorable," Blitzer said. "Federal Reserve data on consumer credit and mortgage debt outstanding reveal that consumers are borrowing money."

But are they borrowing too much? Back in September the personal finance website WalletHub published a study showing consumers added a record $34.4 billion in new credit card debt in the second quarter of last year, the largest build-up since the government began tracking the statistic in 1986.

At the time, the authors of the study wrote that it is not a question of whether consumers are weakening financially, but rather how long "this trend toward pre-recession habits will last and just how bad it will get.”

One measure of how consumers are doing financially is how they are handling their debt.On the heels of a report showing a rising credit card default ra...

Article Image

GOP lawmakers seek to block prepaid debit card rule

In the wake of the financial crisis, millions of consumers became "unbanked," meaning they had no bank account.

Some became "unbanked" by choice, but many were either dropped by their banks or could no longer afford the fees associated with bank accounts.

These consumers often turned to prepaid debit cards as an alternative. These cards provided easy access to cash and an ability to pay bills online. But just like banks, these cards were often loaded with fees, including hefty overdraft fees.

In October, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) finalized rules to increase consumer protections for prepaid card users. The rules require prepaid card issuers to provide many of the same protections to consumers that credit card companies provide. They also require issuers to give consumers clear information about fees before an account is opened.

Lawmaker claims rules hurt consumers

Now, seven Republican members of the U.S. Senate are seeking to block implementation of those rules. Sen. David Perdue (R-Ga.) is the primary sponsor of the legislation, claiming the rules are actually hurting consumers who use prepaid cards.

“If the CFPB wants to continue to impose rules and regulations that impact every American’s financial well-being, it must answer to the American people,” said Perdue, a member of the Senate Banking Committee. “As a business guy, I have experienced first-hand the impact overregulation has on growth and innovation. This rule is entirely too broad and would cripple the electronic payment marketplace which Georgians and millions of consumers across the country depend on.”

But the National Consumer Law Center (NCLC) contends that isn't the case at all. It claims the primary beneficiary of the CFPB rules rollback would be a prepaid card company called NetSpend (an Authorized Partner), whose parent company, TSYS, is based in Perdue's state.

More overdraft fees

NCLC contends a successful repeal of the rules would result in Netspend (an Authorized Partner) collecting $80 million a year in overdraft fees while blocking the expanded fraud protections.


“It is outrageous that Congress may block basic fraud protections on prepaid cards so that NetSpend (an Authorized Partner) can keep gouging struggling families with overdraft fees that have no place on prepaid cards,” said Lauren Saunders, associate director of the NCLC.

Sauders says the move is a continuation of the GOP's campaign against the CFPB, which was established under Dodd-Frank financial reform legislation. GOP lawmakers say the CFPB is not accountable as other government agencies are and has repeatedly overstepped its bounds.

But Saunders say CFPB has been an effective consumer watchdog that has returned nearly $12 billion to consumers since it was established.

In the wake of the financial crisis, millions of consumers became "unbanked," meaning they had no bank account. Some became "unbanked" by choice, b...

Article Image

About half of consumers emotionally overspend, survey finds

Just like emotions and ice cream, emotions and money often aren’t a great mix. But that doesn’t stop consumers from letting their emotions guide their spending beyond their means.

According to a recent survey by the finance site NerdWallet, 67% of Millennials and 49% of Americans say emotions have caused them to overspend on credit cards. Stress, sadness, and excitement are a few of the emotions that appeared to fuel overspending.

Of those who said emotions cause them to indulge in a little retail therapy, 29% said they’re most likely to overspend due to stress, 22% blamed excitement, and 13% said sadness fueled their spending spree.

“Strong emotions tend to drive us to spend extra, and that’s life,” said Sean McQuay, a credit and banking expert at NerdWallet. To keep your emotions from wreaking havoc on your fiscal fitness, he recommends spending according to your own needs and financial situation.

“Try to keep emotional spending -- whether it’s during times of celebration or stress -- low enough that your finances aren’t significantly impacted. You don’t want today’s emotions to drain your bank account at the expense of your future self,” McQuay said.

Acceptable reasons

Although 86% of consumers surveyed think there are acceptable reasons to go into credit card debt, almost as many (87%) said they would be embarrassed to do so.

A few acceptable reasons for going into debt included: covering emergency purchases (63%), medical expenses (61%), and covering necessary expenses during periods of unemployment (45%).

On the flip side, consumers would be embarrassed to go into debt if it were due to reasons such as overspending on unnecessary purchases (69%), non emergency travel expenses (43%), or cash advances (41%).

Paying off debt

Whether your debt was created by an emotion-fueled trip to the mall or out of necessity, NerdWallet has a few tips for improving your credit card debt situation.

  • Stop increasing your debt. While credit cards may be a great tool for building credit and earning rewards, the interest you pay can make it harder to get on top of debt. So, stop charging.
  • Choose a payoff plan. The “snowball method” of paying off debt entails paying your balances from smallest to largest, while the "high interest plan" involves paying your balances from highest interest rate to lowest interest rate.
  • Find extra money in your budget. It's in your best interest to pay off debt as soon as possible. For this reason, consumers should put any extra money in their budget toward their debt. Create more money in your budget by increasing your income and/or decreasing your expenses and redirecting extra cash toward the card you’re paying off.

McQuay’s golden rule for personal finance: “Don’t keep up with the Joneses -- and don’t judge them either. We each have our own personal finance situation, and it’s surprisingly hard to compare superficially.”

Just like emotions and ice cream, emotions and money often aren’t a great mix. But that doesn’t stop consumers from letting their emotions guide their spen...

Article Image

New Amazon rewards Visa pays 5% cash back

Amazon.com is teaming with Chase to offer a new rewards credit card that pays 5% cash back on all Amazon purchases, 2% at gas stations and restaurants, and 1% everywhere else.

The catch? To get the card you must be a member of Amazon Prime, which carries a $99 fee.

Still, NerdWallet credit card expert Sean McQuay says the new Amazon Prime Rewards Visa Signature Card is a pretty impressive offering.

“By offering a 5% rewards rate, this card is matching the offer of the Amazon Prime Store credit card, an Amazon-only card backed by Synchrony bank, but surpasses that card by offering a much better online experience and compatibility with more than one store,” McQuay said in an email to ConsumerAffairs. “However, the new card does not offer special financing for large purchases. With high rewards, a metal body, and no annual fee, this is a great option for regular Amazon shoppers."

Inducement to join prime

Amazon, of course, is hoping the prospect of 5% off on purchases is just one more inducement to consumers to sign up for Prime, which also offers free 2-day shipping on Amazon purchases and access for Amazon's entertainment package.

Amazon says existing Amazon Rewards Visa Signature cardmembers with an eligible Prime membership will automatically be upgraded to the new card, a newly designed metal card that also has no foreign transaction fees.

“We are adding even more value to Prime by offering rewards on Amazon and everywhere else you shop,” said Max Bardon, an Amazon vice-president.

Other perks

In addition to the cash back rewards, Amazon says the rewards have no cap on what can be earned aand never expire. They are redeemable on products purchased on Amazon.

There is no annual fee, other than the $99 cost of a Prime membership, which carries other benefits.

Other perks include zero liability for fraud and 24/7 concierge service, through Visa Signature.

Amazon.com is teaming with Chase to offer a new rewards credit card that pays 5% cash back on all Amazon purchases, 2% at gas stations and restaurants, and...

Article Image

CFPB: TransUnion, Equifax deceived consumers, ordered to pay restitution

Equifax and TransUnion will need to check their credit scores when they finish coughing up $17.6 million in restitution to consumers and fines totaling $5.5 million levied today by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB).

The bureau, a prime target of Republican lawmakers who have vowed to weaken it or even shut it down, charged that the companies deceived consumers about the usefulness and actual cost of the credit scores they sold.

Also, the CFPB said, the companies lured consumers into costly recurring payments for credit-related products with false promises. It ordered TransUnion and Equifax to truthfully represent the value of the credit scores they provide and the cost of obtaining those credit scores and other services.

“Credit scores are central to a consumer’s financial life and people deserve honest and accurate information about them,” said CFPB Director Richard Cordray.

Two out of three

The companies are two of the nation’s three largest credit reporting agencies. They collect credit information on consumers and use it to generate credit reports and scores that are sold to businesses. They also market, sell, or provide credit-related products directly to consumers, such as credit scores, credit reports, and credit monitoring. 

The CFPB said the companies:

Deceived consumers about the value of the credit scores they sold. In their advertising, TransUnion and Equifax falsely represented that the credit scores they marketed and provided to consumers were the same scores lenders typically use to make credit decisions. In fact, the scores sold by TransUnion and Equifax were not typically used by lenders to make those decisions.

Deceived consumers into enrolling in subscription programs. In their advertising, TransUnion and Equifax falsely claimed that their credit scores and credit-related products were free or, in the case of TransUnion, cost only “$1.”

In reality, CFPB said consumers who signed up received a free trial of seven or 30 days, after which they were automatically enrolled in a subscription program. Unless they cancelled during the trial period, consumers were charged a recurring fee – usually $16 or more per month. This billing structure, known as a “negative option,” was not clearly and conspicuously disclosed to consumers.

Equifax also violated the Fair Credit Reporting Act, which requires a credit reporting agency to provide a free credit report once every 12 months and to operate a central source – AnnualCreditReport.com – where consumers can get their report, CFPB said. Until January 2014, consumers getting their report through Equifax first had to view Equifax advertisements. This violates the Fair Credit Reporting Act, which prohibits such advertising until after consumers receive their report.

Equifax and TransUnion will need to check their credit scores when they finish coughing up $17.6 million in restitution to consumers and fines totaling $5....

Article Image

5 habits of financially fit consumers: #1, Checking credit reports

More than a quarter century ago, Stephen R. Covey wrote “The 7 Habits of Highly Effective People,” a guide to getting your life in order.

This month, millions of consumers will resolve to get their financial lives in order, and we consulted a number of financial experts who elaborate on five habits of financially fit consumers – those who are in control of their finances.

All agree that financial fitness starts with regularly reviewing your credit report. Diane Moogalian, Vice-president of Customer Care at Equifax, says at a minimum, consumers should check their credit once a year.

“For some consumers, a look at their credit report once a year, may be enough. However, for some consumers, they may want more regular visibility with their credit reports, and this can be done through regular credit monitoring,” she told ConsumerAffairs.

It's how the financial world sees you

Author and financial planner Michelle Perry Higgins, principal of California Financial Advisors in San Ramon, Calif., says your credit report tells the world how you manage your financial life.

“Your credit tells lenders, landlords, and even employers how reliable you are at paying your debts and by implication how trustworthy you are,” Higgins said. “By checking your credit report, you will be able to see how you look to creditors and how you may be able to increase your credit score.”

Federal law allows consumers to receive copies of their credit reports from all three credit agencies at no charge. The copies are available at www.annualcreditreport.com.

“Because you can request up to three per year – one from each of the three major agencies – it’s a good idea to request one every four months to keep a continuous track of your record,” said Paul Golden, a spokesman for the National Endowment for Financial Education.

What to look for

Once you download a report, then what? Bruce McClary, Vice-president of Communications at the National Foundation for Credit Counseling, says you need to look it over carefully.

“A regular credit review helps identify reporting errors that may have an adverse impact on your credit rating, and it also helps uncover evidence of identity theft or credit fraud,” McClary said. “Catching these things quickly can make it easy to repair the damage.

McClary says you should also check for accuracy of your name, social security number, address record, employment, accounts and credit inquiries.

Moogalian says it is also important to check credit reports from all three agencies, because creditors and lenders do not necessarily report everything to all three national consumer credit reporting agencies.

“Because consumers are entitled to receive a free credit report from each of the national consumer credit reporting agencies once a year, we think it’s a smart habit to check all three,” she said.

More than a quarter century ago, Stephen R. Covey wrote “The 7 Habits of Highly Effective People,” a guide to getting your life in order.This month, mi...

Article Image

Three good hotel rewards credit cards

Not all travel rewards credit cards are alike. In addition to the variety of perks they offer, they tend to also reward different kinds of travel.

An airline card rewards frequent flying. A gasoline card provides extra cash back when you fill up. And a hotel credit card can give you a free night's stay here and there. Sometimes, it can give you a lot more.

When it comes to hotel credit cards, the card comparison site CreditCards.com singles out the Starwood Preferred Guest card as number one in its class. It sets itself apart with its flexibility.

It not only provides hotel perks, its points can be transferred to more than 30 airline loyalty programs, usually without any loss of points. And because Starwood points are generally worth more than other card points, cardholders usually get more bang for their buck.

All about flexibility

"To me, a good rewards card is all about flexibility," says CreditCards.com senior industry analyst Matt Schulz. "While the Starwood card doesn't have the flashiest sign-up bonus in the bunch, it does give cardholders plenty of options beyond just free hotel nights."

Starwood Hotels is owned by Marriott and operates more than 1,200 hotels under 11 brands, including Westin, Sheraton, and St. Regis.

New cardholders earn 25,000 bonus points after spending $3,000 during the first three months the account is active. There's a $95 annual fee that is waived the first year.

Other options

CreditCards.com also likes the Hilton HHonors Reserve credit card from Citi. New cardholders get rewarded with two free weekend nights at a Hilton hotel after spending $2,500 in the card's first four months.

Cardholders also receive an extra weekend night certificate every year when they spend at least $10,000. Other perks include trip cancellation and interruption protection, lost baggage insurance, and other extra insurance benefits.

“The only downside is Hilton points tend to be worth significantly less than the average card rewards point,” CreditCards.com says.

A third alternative is the Club Carlson Rewards Visa Signature card. CreditCards.com is impressed with its initial sign-up bonus – 50,000 points with the first purchase and 35,000 more after spending $2,500 in the first 90 days.

Cardholders can also earn 40,000 points and a free night every year if they spend $10,000 or more. But just like the Hilton HHonors Reserve card, the points provided by the Club Carlson card tend to be valued less than the industry average.

Not all travel rewards credit cards are alike. In addition to the variety of perks they offer, they tend to also reward different kinds of travel.An ai...

Article Image

Retailer group rebels against Visa network

The nation's retailers appear to be renewing their feud with credit card companies over the fees they charge for processing credit and debit purchases.

Earlier this week, the National Retail Federation (NRF) filed a friend-of-the-court brief in support of the Justice Department motion that the full Second Circuit Court of Appeals hear its case against American Express. The government maintains American Express is still blocking retailers from suggesting customers use a different card, in violation of the law.

Now, the NRF has sent a letter to Visa, asking that it stop using new EMV terminals to steer debit card transactions to its own processing network, which NRF says is more expensive for retailers to use.

In a letter to Visa CEO Charles W. Scharf, NRF points out the Federal Reserve has said Visa's action run counter to the law.

More expensive choice

NRF complains that many credit/debit card readers installed since the card industry began implementing new EMV chip card technology present debit card users with a screen that asks them to choose between “Visa Debit” and “U.S. Debit.”

Though they don't know it, when consumers choose Visa Debit, their transaction is routed over Visa's more expensive network. Instead of a PIN, the consumer is usually required to use only a signature to approve the transaction.

On the other hand, when a consumer chooses the U.S. Debit option, NRF says the transaction goes over the retailer’s choice from about a dozen competing networks that charge merchants less but provide more protection by allowing the use of a secret, secure PIN.

“Visa charges more and offers less security while the competition charges less and does a better job of keeping consumers’ debit cards safe,” NRF Senior Vice President and General Counsel Mallory Duncan wrote.

Retailers say they should choose

Duncan says retailers should be allowed to choose the processor that provides the best value and offers their customers the best protection. He says that's what the law requires.

Why should consumers care? NRF says when costs rise for retailers, those costs get passed along to consumers in the form of higher prices.

NRF claims Visa is steering transactions toward the Visa network, and that the higher fees charged by Visa must be built into the cost of merchandise, ultimately contributing to higher prices paid by consumers.

The organization says the Fed ruled in early November that Visa's actions violate a 2010 debit card reform law that says retailers must be allowed to choose between at least two unaffiliated networks to process debit transactions.

The nation's retailers appear to be renewing their feud with credit card companies over the fees they charge for processing credit and debit purchases....

Article Image

Consumers battered by financial crisis getting their credit back

It takes seven years for a foreclosure, short sale, or bankruptcy to come off a consumer's credit report.

Since the height of the foreclosure tsunami was 2009, a lot of former homeowners, whose credit has been practically non-existent since then, are getting back on their financial feet.

According to an analysis by Experian, one of the three credit agencies, 2.5 million consumers will see their credit standing improve sharply between last June and next June. Of these, the credit agency says 68% are scoring at near-prime or higher credit levels.

Back in the credit market

It means that millions of consumers, largely shut out of the credit market since 2009, will be able to take out loans again. Those who want to buy a home again will most likely qualify for a mortgage, putting even more pressure on extremely tight inventory levels around the country.

Experian also reports that formerly foreclosed or bankrupt borrowers who have already shed those events from the credit reports have returned to the credit markets in large numbers and, by and large, are showing good financial behavior.

The Experian analysis shows 29% of consumers who sold short between 2007 and 2010 have opened a new mortgage, with a delinquency rate that is a full percentage point below the national average.

Win-win

"With millions of borrowers potentially coming back into the housing market, the trends that we're seeing are promising for both the mortgage seeker and the lender," said Michele Raneri, vice president of analytics and new business development at Experian.

Raneri predicts that in the years ahead, these so-called “boomerang borrowers” will be a critical segment of the real-estate market, and perhaps could propel prices still higher.

The Experian report shows that homeowners who had a foreclosure in the past but now have qualified for a mortgage have an average credit score of 680, more than 20% higher than their score at the time of foreclosure.

The record is even better for consumers who sold short. Those who have now qualified for a new mortgage have an average credit score of 706, up 16.5% from when they were forced to sell.

It takes seven years for a foreclosure, short sale, or bankruptcy to come off a consumer's credit report.Since the height of the foreclosure tsunami wa...

Article Image

Will mobile wallets make headway this holiday season?

What will you use to make your holiday purchases this year? Consumers concerned about compromised credit or debt card information may choose cash.

A survey by TransUnion shows consumers are probably going to use a mix of payments to buy things this year, with 74% saying they plan to pay for at least some of their purchases with cash.

But 80% of parents with children under 18 said they will be using credit cards, with 89% of dads and 73% of moms saying they expect to pay off all their holiday spending within three months.

Vincent Alimi, Vice-President, Product & Innovation at Mobeewave, a Montreal-based Fin-Tech firm, says consumers shouldn't overlook using a mobile wallet when they shop. He says there are five good reasons to pay with a mobile wallet, including security. In terms of fraud reduction, he says mobile wallets use a surrogate card number.

Real-time transaction alerts

“Unlike when you use a credit card, details such as your PIN, name or consumer behavior are not shared when you use a mobile wallet,” Alimi said in an email to ConsumerAffairs. “They also include practical features, such as fingerprint verification to unlock the payment functionality, and real-time transaction alerts.”

But wait, don't credit cards offer generous rewards? They do, but Alimi says consumers can still reap rewards by adding retailer loyalty and reward cards to a mobile wallet. In fact, you can use your rewards credit card with a mobile wallet.

Sometimes called “contactless” payment systems, a mobile wallet is a way to carry your card information in a secure, digital form on your smartphone. Instead of using your actual plastic card to make purchases, you can pay with your smartphone, tablet, or smartwatch, simply by holding it close to an equipped point-of-sale terminal.

Faster check-out

Alimi also says mobile wallets get you checked out faster, while the transition to EMV “chip” cards has slowed things down. He says paying with a mobile wallet makes it easier to shop online and also harness the various complementary features on your smartphone.

“Not only can you keep track of your transaction history, you can also ensure you never have to deal with the embarrassment of having your maxed out credit or debit card declined at the checkout,” he said.

Apple Pay may be the most widely used mobile payment system, allowing consumers to pay with their iPhones in about three million locations in the U.S. Samsung has a competing mobile wallet for its Android phones.

What will you use to make your holiday purchases this year? Consumers concerned about compromised credit or debt card information may choose cash.A sur...

Article Image

Consumers rejected for credit cards take it personally

Lenders tend to be cold and objective when they decide whether or not to grant a consumer's credit card application. Meet the requirements and you get a card. Fall short, and you don't.

Consumers don't look at it quite the same way. A new survey from NerdWallet shows we tend to take it personally when a bank says no. The survey found 70% of consumers would stop doing business with a bank that turned down their credit card application.

Rejection of any kind usually is hard to take. But the survey suggests there's an additional ingredient when it comes to financial matters. If a bank declines to extend you credit, you believe it to be a reflection on your financial standing.

It's embarrassing

About half of consumers said a credit card rejection would be embarrassing and they would not tell family or friends about it. About a third believe people who are rejected for a loan or credit card are irresponsible with money, which is far from the case.

If you are rejected for a credit card, the lender is required by law to tell you why. Knowing the reason may not only make you feel better, it can be useful information. In many cases, knowing the reason why you were turned down can guide you to a lender who would be happy to open an account for you.

In many cases, consumers apply for credit cards that are designed for consumers with higher credit scores. That's important, because these cards usually have lower interest rates and more generous rewards. That's because the lender considers these high credit score consumers a better risk.

However, the very same lender may have other credit cards that don't have those stringent requirements. Your chances of success may be much better if you apply for a card within your credit score range.

A number of reasons for rejection

As NerdWallet points out, consumers get rejected for a number of reasons, not just because they have bad credit. They might have too much outstanding debt, a thin credit history, or insufficient income.

That's why before applying for a card, it's a good idea to obtain your credit score and review your credit report, to make sure the information in it is accurate. Once you know your score, look for a card targeted to other consumers in your range.

Many of the credit card comparison websites list credit cards available for those with “excellent,” “good,” “fair,” and even “bad” credit. So, with a 640 credit score you probably are not going to qualify for the Capital One Venture Rewards Card, which is heavily advertised on TV. But you probably will qualify for the Credit One Bank Unsecured Visa.

It doesn't have the advantages of cards designed for excellent credit, but it will give you the chance to show you can use a credit card responsibly and raise your credit score so that you'll soon have more credit options and fewer rejections.

Lenders tend to be cold and objective when they decide whether or not to grant a consumer's credit card application. Meet the requirements and you get a ca...

Article Image

Three highly rated airline credit cards

Consumers should be aware by now that there are big advantages to using a rewards credit card, and in particular, a card that rewards certain things.

For example, most consumers are probably better off with a cash-back credit card, which pays as much as 2% on all purchases or as much as 5% on certain categories.

But frequent air travelers might profit more from using a card that rewards in miles. We've identified three such cards that are worth a look.

Capital One VentureOne Reward

Consumers who carry the Capital One VentureOne Reward Card earn an unlimited 1.25 miles on every purchase, making it easy to rack up miles. As an added bonus, there is no annual fee – a rarity in this class of credit card.

When you earn 100 miles, you've earned $1 dollar in travel rewards. But the rewards come a lot faster for new cardholders, who get 20,000 bonus miles if they make $1,000 in purchases within the first three months of card activation.

You can redeem your miles as a statement credit. As added perks, the rewards don't expire and you can carry a balance the first year without paying any interest.

Barclaycard Arrival Plus World Elite MasterCard's Rewards

Another good choice for frequent travelers is the Barclaycard Arrival Plus World Elite MasterCard's Rewards Card. You earn two times the miles on all purchases.

Right off the bat, new cardholders get 50,000 bonus miles if they spend $3,000 in the first 90 days of card activation. That adds up to a $500 travel statement credit.

The miles don't expire and you get 5% miles back every time you redeem, to use toward the next redemption. There's an $89 annual fee, but it's waived the first year. The card also has a 0% introductory balance transfer rate for 12 months if the transfer is made within the first 45 days.

Gold Delta SkyMiles Credit Card from American Express

For consumers who find themselves flying Delta most of the time, the Gold Delta SkyMiles Credit Card from American Express might be a good fit. It pays two miles for every dollar spent on purchases made directly with Delta, and a mile for every dollar spent on all other eligible purchases.

New card members earn 30,000 bonus miles if they make $1,000 in purchases within the first three months of card activation and earn an extra $50 statement credit just by making a Delta purchase during that time.

There are also some air travel-specific perks as well. Card members can check their first bag for free on every Delta flight, saving $100 on a round-trip. They also enjoy jumping to the head of the line with priority boarding.

There's a $95 annual fee, but it's waived the first year.

Consumers should be aware by now that there are big advantages to using a rewards credit card, and in particular, a card that rewards certain things.Fo...

Article Image

Credit card worries weighing on consumers

Student loan debt has been a growing concern over the last three years, as the outstanding loan total has surged past $1 trillion.

And make no mistake, there are plenty of young people who stay up at night worrying about how they are going to pay it back. There is also evidence it has kept young buyers out of the housing market.

But is it the biggest financial worry consumers have? Not by a long shot.

A new poll conducted for the National Foundation for Credit Counseling (NFCC) has found that credit cards are the biggest financial worry for consumers, and other concerns aren't even close.

When asked what financial issue caused them the most worry, 69% of consumers said credit cards. The second biggest worry concerned the inability to save for retirement or emergencies, mentioned by 13% of consumers. Student loan debt was third, at 10%.

Consumers have been racking up debt

The answers might not be all that surprising. Last month, personal finance site WalletHub reported that consumers racked up a record $34.4 billion in credit card debt in the second quarter of this year. It was the largest second quarter build-up since the government starting tracking the statistic in 1986.

“Credit cards are a useful and effective financial tool for those who keep their balances under control,” said Bruce McClary, spokesperson for the NFCC. “Balances sometimes grow beyond the point where they can easily be repaid, which is a sign that it’s time to reach out to a financial professional for guidance.”

McClary says the key to keeping credit card debt under control is to pay significantly more than the minimum monthly payment. He notes it could take 26 years for a consumer paying only the minimum to pay off a $7,600 balance at 15% interest. Over that payoff period, the interest paid in addition to the principle balance would be $9,229.

Student loan debt has been a growing concern over the last three years, as the outstanding loan total has surged past $1 trillion.And make no mistake,...

Article Image

Why you should do your holiday shopping with a credit card

The holiday shopping season is fast approaching and surveys have shown that many consumers have been making purchases since Labor Day.

So now might be a good time to point out that if you plan to do a lot of end-of-the-year spending, doing it with a rewards credit card might help you save as much money as hitting the stores early on Black Friday.

In recent years personal finance experts have emphasized rewards credit cards as an easy way to save money. Like any credit card, a rewards card needs to be used responsibly, but if utilized to make purchases you would ordinarily make with a debit card or cash, credit card purchases can put money in your pocket.

How much varies from card to card, but the folks at Discover have rolled out some special holiday promotions, upping the rewards consumers can earn during the holidays, using the Discover it Card or Discover it for Students. Both cards normally pay 1% on all purchases but also have special quarterly promotions.

5% bonus

For example, for the fourth quarter Discover will pay a 5% cashback bonus on purchases at Amazon.com, department stores, and Sam's Club – places where consumers probably do the lion's share of their shopping. The 5% bonus applies to a total purchase amount of $1,500. Above that, any additional spending earns the regular 1% cash back.

“We try to make sure that we don't make our program complicated,” Maureen Powers, vice-president of rewards for Discover, told ConsumerAffairs. “We don't want customers to have to start planning how they are going to earn their rewards, or having to do math.”

Added bonus for new customers

There's an even better payoff for consumers who just recently obtained a Discover it Card, or plan to get one soon.

“Our card members can earn Cash Back Match,” Powers said. “They are earning all of these rewards, and then at the end of the first 12 months that they have the card, we will double all of those rewards.”

How much can that add up to? Let's assume you are a new cardholder who ends up spending $1,750 at Amazon, a number of department stores, and Sam's Club. You earn $75 on the first $1,500 and $2.50 on the difference between $1,500 and $1,750. Then, because you qualify for Cash Back Match, the amount is doubled for a total of $155 in cash rewards.

Powers also says Discover offers price protection, in case you find the item you purchase later at a lower price.

“What consumers will do is send in the receipt and show where they found a better price, and Discover will refund the difference up to $500, if you do it within 90 days of the purchase,” she said.

While doing your holiday shopping with cash may keep you from overspending, it doesn't put money in your pocket. But it bears repeating, using a rewards credit card for all your holiday purchases will only put you ahead if you exercise discipline and don't over-spend.

The holiday shopping season is fast approaching and surveys have shown that many consumers have been making purchases since Labor Day.So now might be a...

Article Image

Navy Federal Credit Union fined for improper debt collection practices

Navy Federal Credit Union has been ordered to pay $23 million to victims of improper debt collection activites. It was also ordered to pay a $5.5 million fine by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB).

The CFPB said Navy Federal made false threats about debt collection and unfairly restricted account access when members had a delinquent loan.

“Navy Federal Credit Union misled its members about its debt collection practices and froze consumers out from their own accounts,” said CFPB Director Richard Cordray. “Financial institutions have a right to collect money that is due to them, but they must comply with federal laws as they do so.”

Navy Federal Credit Union is a federal credit union based in Vienna, Va. Membership is limited to consumers who are, or have been, U.S. military servicemembers, Department of Defense civilian employees or contractors, government employees assigned to Department of Defense installations, and their immediate family members. It is the largest credit union in the country, with more than $73 billion in assets as of December 2015.

The CFPB investigation found that Navy Federal deceived consumers to get them to pay delinquent accounts. The credit union falsely threatened severe actions when, in fact, it seldom took such actions or did not have authorization to take them.

It said the credit union also cut off members’ electronic access to their accounts and bank cards if they did not pay overdue loans. Hundreds of thousands of consumers were affected by these practices, which occurred between January 2013 and July 2015.

Navy Federal Credit Union has been ordered to pay $23 million to victims of improper debt collection activites. It was also ordered to pay a $5.5 million f...

Article Image

Prepaid cards get new federal protections

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB)  has issued a new rule covering prepaid debit cards, providing a series of new consumer protections. The rule goes into effect October 1, 2017.

Consumers often use these cards instead of bank accounts. Money can be directly loaded on the cards, which can be used to make purchases or pay bills. The problem for consumers has been the fees associated with the cards and the lack of transparency for some of them.

That's because not all of these cards are the same. The cards have their distinct set of features, functions, and fees. Right now, it can be hard to compare cards because each card displays fee information differently.

The CFPB says the new rule will require clear, upfront information about fees so consumers will more easily shop for the best deal.

Reins in overdraft fees

The rule also tightly regulates overdraft fees connected to prepaid cards, which Nick Bourke, director of consumer finance at the Pew Charitable Trusts, is one of the most important features.

“The CFPB’s rule on prepaid cards is a big win for consumers,” Bourke said in an email to ConsumerAffairs. “First and foremost, it keeps the cards free from overdraft penalties, which aligns with consumers’ preferences.”

Bourke points to research that shows many consumers turn to prepaid cards to control spending and to avoid overdraft fees.

“Moving forward, we strongly encourage the bureau to rein in these harmful fees for checking accounts, the most widely used financial product in the U.S.,” he said.

Growing use

The use of prepaid cards has rapidly grown since the financial crisis, when many consumers joined the “unbanked” population. But Pew researchers say the cards are also widely used by people who also have bank accounts.

Use of prepaid cards rose more than 50% from 2012 to 2014, driven primarily by increased adoption among consumers with bank accounts, with approximately 23 million U.S. adults regularly using prepaid cards, according to Pew data.

Pew found that 72% of unbanked consumers and 45% of those with bank accounts say they use prepaid cards to avoid overdraft fees. A huge majority – 86% – prefer to have a transaction declined for insufficient funds than pay a $35 overdraft fee.

The rule also provides new features to make sure prepaid cards are safer to use at retail point-of-purchase locations and online. Currently, if an unauthorized person accesses a prepaid cardholder's account, the level of protection depends on the issuer. Under the new rule, there will be universal protections for all cards in case they are lost or stolen.

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB)  has issued a new rule covering prepaid debit cards, providing a series of new consumer protections. The ru...

Article Image

Should you cancel your fraudulent Wells Fargo credit card?

What if you are one of the two million Wells Fargo customers who recently discovered that the bank opened a fraudulent bank or credit card account in your name?

If so, you're probably angry, since you didn't ask for the card. So you'll show them – you'll close the account.

But not so fast. Closing a credit card account, even one opened in your name without your permission, can negatively impact your credit score. So you might not want to act until you are able to figure out what the damage will be.

Diane Moogalian, Vice President, Customer Operations at Equifax, one of the three main credit agencies, says closing a credit card account that has no balance will reduce the amount of credit at your disposal. Often, she says, that can be a mark against you.

“Lenders and creditors want to see that a consumer is able to make a financial commitment and honor it – over time," Moogalian told ConsumerAffairs. “In other words, that ability to show responsibility can take time, and sometimes keeping an account open can be a good thing.”

But if you don't want the credit card, you will probably suffer less of a hit by closing it if the card has a low credit limit. Chances are, most of the fraudulent accounts have low credit limits. By closing it, you aren't reducing your credit availability that much.

Is it costing you money?

Moogalian says a consumer may also want to consider closing an account that has no balance if that account is costing money. The trade off between spending unnecessary money and having your credit score go down temporarily should go in favor of not spending money needlessly.

How much will closing a credit card account affect your credit score? It depends on how much credit you have, how much you've used, and how good your credit is.

If you have a total credit limit of $20,000 on all your cards but only have balances totaling $4,000, you have a low credit utilization rate and closing an account that reduces your limit by only $1,000 or so won't make a lot of difference, especially if you already have a pretty good credit score.

And if you do have a good credit score, the hit you take for closing your Wells Fargo account should be fairly small and short-lived. By continuing to pay all your bills on time and not opening new credit lines for a while, your score should quickly recover.

What if you are one of the two million Wells Fargo customers who recently discovered that the bank opened a fraudulent bank or credit card account in your...

Article Image

When it comes to credit card rewards, consumers like cash

Consumers are learning that it pays to be choosy about which credit card they use. Many now offer some type of reward or incentive, so instead of using a card that pays nothing, it's clear consumers should choose a card that offers some type of reward.

But what kind of reward? While there are many choices, a survey by Ally Bank shows most consumers prefer cold, hard cash.

Fifty-eight percent of the consumers in the survey chose cash back instead of miles, store promotions, and low introductory rates.

Ally Bank, of course, recently introduced a cash back card which has gotten some pretty good reviews. However, there are other cash back cards that offer attractive benefits as well.

First, let's take a look at the Ally CashBack Credit Card. The card, introduced in June, will provide a 2% cash back reward when the card is used for eligible gasoline and grocery purchases. It provides 1% cash back on all other purchases.

Having a bank account can add to rewards

The Ally credit card also pays an additional 10% bonus if earned cash back rewards are deposited into an Ally Bank non-IRA savings, interest checking, or money market account. That makes it similar to another attractive cash back card, the BankAmericard Cash Rewards Card.

The BankAmericard product pays 3% on gasoline purchases, 2% on groceries, and 1% on everything else, on spending of $2,500 per quarter. It too provides a 10% bonus when you redeem rewards into a Bank of America account.

While the BankAmericard caps rewards and the Ally card doesn't, the BankAmericard has the added benefit of a one-time cash bonus of $100 when you spend $500 in the first 90 days of account activation.

Meanwhile, the Chase Freedom Card is among the most generous of cash back credit cards. It pays 5% on up to $1,500 of purchases per quarter, with the categories eligible for the rewards changing on a quarterly basis. Still, if you managed to max out the purchases each quarter, you could earn $75 cash back.

Don't want to keep up with rotating categories? There are plenty of cash back cards that pay 1% to 1.5% on everything, with no caps.

When choosing a cash back rewards card, the important thing is to choose one with no annual fee. Otherwise, the rewards won't be quite so rewarding.

Consumers are learning that it pays to be choosy about which credit card they use. Many now offer some type of reward or incentive, so instead of using a c...

Article Image

Wells Fargo reportedly faces probe by federal prosecutors

The dust has yet to settle from Wells Fargo's admission that thousands of its employees opened bogus checking and credit card accounts in order to hit sales goals.

You might say it is heading into a dust storm.

Various media outlets are citing anonymous sources which say that FBI and federal prosecutors have begun an investigation into the matter, which burst into public view this week with the announcement that Wells Fargo was paying $185 million in fines to federal and Los Angeles regulators.

The bank said it had fired 5,300 employees who allegedly opened hundreds of thousands of deposit and credit card accounts for consumers without those consumers' knowledge or permission, presumably to meet strict sales goals.

Neither the FBI nor the bank would comment on reports of a potential criminal investigation, but that's normal procedure. It would be highly unusual if either party did.

Congress getting into the act

However, the Senate Banking Committee has scheduled a public hearing for next week in which it will press Wells Fargo CEO John Stumpf to explain what happened and how. The committee will also hear from officials of the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB), and Los Angeles City Attorney's Office, the agencies that uncovered the activity.

In a bid to limit the fallout from the revelations, Stumph went on CNBC's “Mad Money” this week and apologized to consumers who had accounts opened without their permission. He told host Jim Cramer he takes “personal responsibility” for the scandal, but also said he would not resign because of it.

There has been some speculation that Stumph might be forced out over the revelations, but Joe Morford, an analyst with RBC Capital Markets, told the San Francisco Examiner he believes Stumph will survive.

"I'm a little surprised that the issue has become as big as it has,” Morford told the newspaper. “But this is the kind of story that does well with politicians and the press — not to diminish what happened."

Another takeaway from all of this, at least for allies of the CFPB, is the role of the watchdog in exposing Wells Fargo's activity. Treasury Secretary Jack Lew says, if not for the often-criticized agency, along with other regulators, the scandal would not have come to light.

The dust has yet to settle from Wells Fargo's admission that thousands of its employees opened bogus checking and credit card accounts in order to hit sale...

Article Image

Whose credit card application is the easiest to understand?

When you shop for a new credit card, there may be several deciding factors. You may want a card with specific types of rewards, or you may want the lowest interest rate.

But how will you know which card to select if the applications aren't clear and transparent, presenting the positives and negatives in plain language?

That's why personal finance site WalletHub compiles an annual study of the credit cards with the clearest applications. The study evaluated online credit card listings from the websites of the 10 largest banks and 10 biggest credit unions. The sites were judged on how clearly they spelled out important information.

Can you understand the rewards program?

For example, the applications were judged on how clearly they presented information about rewards and how a consumer could redeem them. It looked at how prominently information about an annual fee was displayed.

Could the average consumer, the authors asked, figure out the annual cost of financing new purchases using an introductory rate? How was information about balance transfers presented?

On the plus side, the study gave high marks to Capital One, U.S. Bank, Bank of America, State Employees Credit Union, Boeing Employees Credit Union, Pentagon Federal Credit Union, and Navy Federal Credit Union.

On the other hand, the authors said Wells Fargo and San Diego County Credit Union finish at the bottom when it comes to clean, transparent credit apps.

Most improved application

Navy Federal Credit Union took the honors for most improved application. The study found Navy Federal's online credit card listings improved 18 points over last year. It credits the improvement to new-purchase and balance-transfer financing clarity.

While credit unions have the reputation for being more consumer friendly than banks, the WalletHub study found banks stepped up their game in 2016 and are now about as transparent with their credit card applications as credit unions.

The area where financial institutions are most vague tends to be about balance transfer fees and how cardholders go about using rewards.

It's important for consumers to remember that most cards that offer a 0% introductory rate for balance transfers usually charge a 3% fee to transfer a balance. When considering one of these cards, consumers should look for that information, and if the financial institution has a clear application, that fee should be readily apparent.

The good news? WalletHub says banks and credit unions continue to improve their applications. It says transparency is now at its highest point since the annual study began in 2010.

When you shop for a new credit card, there may be several deciding factors. You may want a card with specific types of rewards, or you may want the lowest...

Article Image

RushCard introduces new mobile app

RushCard, a popular prepaid money card, is introducing a new. free mobile app it says will provide new safety features, while enhancing the card's functionality.

It is available on both the Android and iOS platforms.

One of the safety features allows the user to freeze activity if the card is lost or stolen. By engaging “Pause Protection,” a user can temporarily stop purchases on the card.

Another feature is “One Touch Access,” which allows cardholders to access their accounts on a mobile device by using a fingerprint instead of a password or PIN.

The app also includes a pharmacy benefit e-card, which gives cardholders discounts on prescription drugs at Walmart.

"We are dedicated to providing safe, simple and affordable products to our customers to help them achieve their personal and financial goals," said Ron Hynes, CEO of RushCard.

Popular alternative to bank accounts

Founded in 2003 by hip-hop impresario Russell Simmons, RushCard is billed as a solution to the millions of "unbanked" consumers, those who for one reason or another do not have a traditional bank account with checking and debit card privileges.

The card is an inexpensive service that allows consumers to have their paychecks and benefits payments direct-deposited to their cards, allowing them to make purchases immediately and get cash from ATMs. It has generally recorded high satisfaction scores from consumers. Simmons says the new app is simply a way to make the card easier to use.

"From the early days of prepaid, RushCard helped shape this industry and continues to provide innovative products that are easy to use, convenient to access and help provide financial opportunity to our customers," he said.

RushCard customers can get directions for downloading the “Make Moves” app here.

RushCard, a popular prepaid money card, is introducing a new. free mobile app it says will provide new safety features, while enhancing the card's function...

Article Image

What causes you the most financial stress?

Money probably is not the root of all evil, but it probably is the cause of a large share of financial stress.

GoBankingRates surveyed 7,000 consumers nationwide and found a common set of issues tends to keep people up at night. Number one of the list, not surprisingly, is managing credit card debt.

More than 20% of the consumers in the survey said paying off debt – mostly credit cards – was the biggest source of financial stress in their lives.

According to a report by Value Penguin, the average American household debt totals $5,700. But the average for households carrying a balance is three times as much – $16,048.

That no doubt is a major stress point, since it will take years, and sacrificing future spending, in order to pay it off.

Retirement worries

Second on the list of financial stresses is worrying about not being able to retire. It stands to reason that if you are struggling to pay off large amounts of debt, you aren't putting much money away for retirement.

In terms of demographics, it is men and women between the ages of 45 and 64 who feel this stress the most.

The same percentage of consumers are stressed because they have saved no money to meet an emergency expense. A rule of thumb is having enough money to pay living expenses for six months, but few people in the survey said they had that.

Interestingly, it was consumers of retirement age – those 65 and older – who are the most stressed about the lack of emergency savings.

Declining lifestyle

Fourteen percent admitted to being stressed because they can't afford the lifestyle they want. That might seem a superficial stress to make this list, but consider this: incomes have been stagnant since the Great Recession while costs continue to go higher. Consumers may feel stressed because they are unable to maintain their past standard of living, not because they can't keep up with the Jones'.

Paying for education is a source of stress for 13% of consumers – mostly young people and their parents. Lack of stable income – such as working part-time instead of full-time – causes heartburn for nearly 12%.

In something of a silver lining, stressing over the rent or mortgage payment was mentioned by just under 10% of consumers, suggesting at least most are able to meet that basic cost of living.

Kristen Bonner, lead researcher for the study, says the results were broken down geographically, but do not show huge disparities by region.

The troubling takeaway, she says, is that consumers appear to be stressed by financial events that occurred in the past and are not looking forward and focusing on improving their financial futures.

Money probably is not the root of all evil, but it probably is the cause of a large share of financial stress.GoBankingRates surveyed 7,000 consumers n...

Article Image

Consumers encountering fewer credit card fees

Oil prices aren't the only thing going down. A new report from CreditCards.com found fewer credit cards are charging foreign transaction fees – a significant cost savings for consumers who travel outside the U.S.

According to the report, 77 credit cards levied the fee last year but this year only 61 do.

When you add up all the fees charged by the 100 credit cards, the report says the total number is 593, down from 613 a year ago.

"Many card issuers are eliminating foreign transaction fees in an effort to win business from high-spending international travelers," said Matt Schulz, CreditCards.com's senior industry analyst.

$3 for every $100 spent

The typical foreign transaction fee is 3%, adding $3 to every $100 charge. Schultz says getting rid of the fee is a smart way for credit card companies to become the go-to card in travelers' wallets.

The report also looked at the credit cards with the most and fewest potential fees. In the most category, First Premier Bank Credit Card and First Premier Bank Secured MasterCard top the list at 12 each.

Close behind are Club Carlson Business Rewards Visa and Credit One Visa Platinum with 11 each.

On the other hand, Pentagon Federal Credit Union Promise Visa Card has no fees and seven cards have only two. The report says the average credit card has six different fees, with the late fee and cash advance fee being the most common.

"The trend toward fewer credit card fees is a great thing for consumers," Schulz said. "It's such a crazy-competitive time in the credit card business and lower fees are just another way that Americans are reaping the benefits."

Prepaid card fees

Prepaid cards, while technically not credit cards, also carry a lot of fees. A new report by CardHub.com finds selecting the wrong card can cost consumers more than $300 a year.

Among the report's findings, prepaid cards offered by big national banks tend to be 82% less expensive to use than those issued by smaller banks. The report also found that nearly half of prepaid cards lack the necessary features to make them suitable for the average consumer.

“Perhaps surprisingly, prepaid cards charge far fewer fees than their first cousin, checking accounts,” the authors write.

The report found the best prepaid card to use as an alternative to a checking account is American Express Serve, followed by Bluebird and the Green Dot Gold Card.

Oil prices aren't the only thing going down. A new report from CreditCards.com found fewer credit cards are charging foreign transaction fees – a significa...

Article Image

Santander Bank to pay $10 million for overdraft service violations

Santander Bank will pay a $10 million fine for illegal overdraft service practices, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) has ordered. The agency said Santander's telemarketing vendor deceptively marketed the overdraft service and signed some customers up without their consent.

“Santander tricked consumers into signing up for an overdraft service they didn’t want and charged them fees,” said CFPB Director Richard Cordray. “Santander’s telemarketer used deceptive sales pitches to mislead customers into enrolling in overdraft service. We will put a stop to any such unlawful practices that harm consumers.”

This could be why consumers like Alex of Huntingdon Valley, Pa., say they were charged for a service they don't remember signing up for.

"They said I apparently walked in the bank and requested a form to be opted in. I do not recall this. Now they can't even find the option in form that I apparently requested and signed," Alex said in a ConsumerAffairs review. "They charged me a bunch of overdraft fees. Manager is a totally floozy. Won't even call me back. Horrible customer service. Or can you even call it customer service?"

In addition to paying the civil money penalty to the CFPB, Santander Bank must go back and give consumers the opportunity to provide their consent to overdraft service, not use a vendor to telemarket its overdraft service, and it must increase oversight of vendors it uses to telemarket other consumer financial products or services, according to a consent order.

Santander, based in Wilmington, Del., operates a network of nearly 700 retail branch offices in Connecticut, Delaware, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, and Rhode Island.

"Account Protector"

Consumers rate Santander Consumer USA

From 2010 to 2014, Santander marketed and enrolled consumers in its “Account Protector” overdraft service for ATM and one-time debit card transactions, and charged consumers $35 per overdraft. Santander used a telemarketer to call consumers to persuade them to opt in to the overdraft service and rewarded the telemarketer with a higher hourly rate when it hit specified sales targets, the CFPB said.

In 2010, federal rules took effect prohibiting banks and credit unions from charging overdraft fees on ATM and one-time debit card transactions unless consumers affirmatively opt in. If consumers don’t opt in, banks may decline the transactions because of insufficient or unavailable funds, and can’t charge an overdraft fee.

Santander Bank will pay a $10 million fine for illegal overdraft service practices, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) has ordered. The agency...

Article Image

Retailers blame credit card companies for delay in chip roll-out

Why are there so few chip-enabled card readers at retailers around the country? It depends on who you ask. The nation's retailers say they've done their jobs – it's the credit card companies that have dropped the ball.

The National Retail Federation (NRF) points to a survey that found 48% of retailers have implemented the new EMV chip card system, or are expected to within weeks. A total of 86% said they expected to be EMV compliant by the end of 2016.

But the NRF said the survey also found that 57% of the retailers who had not yet implemented the new system had installed the card readers, but were waiting for certification by the credit card industry. About 60% said they had been waiting for six months or longer.

NRF says those numbers are in sharp contract to the statistics issued by the banking industry, which it says has tried to shift blame for the slow start to retailers. The survey, NRF says, found retailers are eager to begin using the chip card system since it protects them from liability connected to fraud.

Certification process

The certification process for the chip card system checks out a number of important functions to ensure the new technology is working properly. It can be a complicated process because the system must check out across multiple card platforms, including MasterCard, Visa, American Express, and Discover.

The size of the retailer can also complicate things. Big retailers with more point of sale positions take a lot more time.

Hundreds of tests may be required and the process might take two weeks or eight months. The cost to the retailer might be as little as a few hundred dollars or could run into the tens of thousands of dollars.

Visa says it's helping

Visa, meanwhile, recently announced steps it said could help speed up the implementation of the chip card technology. It said it has streamlined testing requirements, made the certification process simpler, and made commitments to improve the technology. It also said it is changing its policy to help limit exposure to counterfeit fraud liability for merchants who are not yet chip-ready.

While retailers might feel frustration at the pace, Visa maintains that progress has been “significant,” with over 300 million chip cards in the hands of consumers and 1.2 million retail locations now equipped to accept them.

But the NRF said it is disappointed the credit card industry has not provided enough personnel to make sure certification happens in a timely manner. In the meantime, it says consumers are confused as to whether they continue to swipe their cards or begin “dipping.”

Why are there so few chip-enabled card readers at retailers around the country? It depends on who you ask. The nation's retailers say they've done their jo...

Article Image

Five questions (and answers) about your credit report

Surveys have shown that there are significant knowledge gaps among consumers when it comes to credit reports. Yet these documents are very important to consumers when they want to finance a home or car, or even get insurance.

So it is very important to have at least a basic understanding of credit reports and how they work. With information provided by the Federal Reserve, here are five key questions consumers might have.

1. Where does the information in the report come from?

Your credit history is compiled into an ongoing report by three credit reporting agencies – Experian, Equifax, and TransUnion. These companies get the information from other companies that have extended you credit.

That includes the obvious, like mortgage lenders and credit card companies. But it can also include your cell phone provider, the utility company, and many other companies that send you a monthly bill. The report lets these companies know if you pay your bills on time.

2. Who gets to see my credit report?

The information in your credit report is highly confidential, but there are a number of entities that, with your permission, may get access to it. Anyone extending you credit may see it, as can a prospective employer.

Insurance companies you are doing business with can also review your credit report, and so can some government agencies reviewing your financial status for benefits.

3. Can anything be done if there is incorrect information in my report?

Yes. If you are denied credit because of something in your credit report, you have a right to know what it is. If the information is incorrect, you may appeal to have it removed.

If you appeal within 60 days you can get a free copy of your credit report – in addition to the free report you can get annually – and review the information. If you find information you believe is erroneous, follow these steps to have it removed.

4. If the negative information is legitimate, how long does it remain?

In most cases, negative credit information will remain in your credit report for seven years. A personal bankruptcy filing will stay in your report for 10 years.

If you have been sued or there is an unpaid judgment against you, it can remain for either seven years or until the statute of limitations runs out, whichever is longer. If you have been convicted of a crime, that fact may stay on your credit report indefinitely.

5. Can I see a copy of my credit report?

Absolutely. The law allows you to obtain a copy from each of the three credit reporting agencies once a year, at no charge. This only includes the report, not your credit score – that costs extra.

To receive a free copy of your credit report, go to www.annualcreditreport.com, or call (877) 322-8228.

Surveys have shown that there are significant knowledge gaps among consumers when it comes to credit reports. Yet these documents are very important to con...

Article Image

Which credit cards provide the best travel insurance protection?

There are many things that can derail a vacation, leading to some hefty expense for those with non-refundable reservations. That's why many consumers choose to purchase travel insurance.

But a new report from CardHub, a credit card comparison site, finds a handful of credit cards provide pretty good insurance coverage, if used to purchase the trip. They don't cover all contingencies, but some you might not expect.

The CardHub study found that travel insurance perks by credit card companies can reimburse customers when a trip gets cancelled, when a connecting flight is missed, when damage is lost or delayed, and even in the event of death.

The coverage varies from card to card, so the study compared 57 personal and 23 business credit cards to evaluate the coverage.

Nearly 93% of the cards in the study offer travel accident insurance, providing an average of $352,000 in coverage. Chase Sapphire Preferred was judged to be the best, providing $500,000 in coverage.

43% insure lost luggage

Almost 43% of cards will compensate travelers when luggage is lost, with an average of $2,500 included in the coverage. The Sapphire Preferred and Citi Prestige Card tied for best, with $3,000 in coverage. They both also pay up to $500 per trip for delayed bags.

The Chase Sapphire Preferred also wins in the category of best trip delay/cancellation coverage, paying $10,000 per trip. That beats the card average of $3,300, offered by 33% of cards in the study.

Not surprisingly, the Chase Sapphire Preferred also wins in the category of best overall card for travel insurance.

Among business credit cards, the Chase Ink Plus swept all categories as the best card to protect business trips. It achieved an overall score of 93%, compared to its nearest competitor, the Chase Ink Cash, at 84%.

Consumers using these cards do not have to register or sign up to receive the coverage. They simply have to contact their credit card company if they want to file a claim.

There are many things that can derail a vacation, leading to some hefty expense for those with non-refundable reservations. That's why many consumers choos...

Article Image

Here's what credit card companies look for when you apply

Getting a credit card isn't nearly as hard as getting a mortgage these days, but face it – lenders aren't just handing out plastic to anyone, like they did once upon a time.

That's actually a good thing, because a lender who extends you credit without bothering to find out whether you can repay it is not doing you any favors. Just ask payday loan borrowers.

So when you apply for a credit card, the company is going to look at a number of factors – some that might be considered fair, some maybe not so fair. At any rate, knowing what they are going in might save you some time and heartburn.

Credit report and score

As you might expect, a credit card issuer is going to check your credit report and score. It will look for any negative issues in your report, such as late payments or accounts in collections.

It will also look at your other credit card accounts. If you have other cards with balances close to the credit limit, that might reduce your chances of having your application approved.

If you already have a credit card with the same lender, it will likely take that into consideration. If you have been a good customer, making all your payments on time and managing your balance, your chances are good of getting more credit.

But if you have a large balance and have been late a couple of times with your payment, the credit card company will probably decline your application.

Credit card companies will also look at your income. Someone who spends a lot of money with plastic is less of a risk if they have a good, steady income. In fact, these are the kinds of customers credit card companies prefer.

Other criteria

But lenders have other criteria for judging applications that might come as a surprise. According to the Center for Responsible Lending, the 2009 CARD Act contained many needed reforms, but still allows lenders to judge a consumer's risk – and even set the interest rate – from personal information, such as where a consumer shops and what he or she buys.

In a chicken-and-egg conundrum, you might also be rejected if you have never had a credit card. Some lenders don't want to be first.

In that case, you might consider applying for a secured credit card, such as the Discover It Secured Card. For starters, there is no annual fee and no late fee on your first late payment. However, if you are trying to rebuild your credit, having any late payments should be avoided.

The card is secured by a deposit, which serves as your credit limit. If you deposit $500, then your monthly credit limit is $500. After 12 months, Discover looks at your account and, if you have paid on time, you can get your security deposit back.

More importantly, it reports your payment history regularly to the three credit agencies, helping to improve your overall credit profile and making it easier to qualify for credit in the future.

Getting a credit card isn't nearly as hard as getting a mortgage these days, but face it – lenders aren't just handing out plastic to anyone, like they did...

Article Image

Your Amex card's no good at Costco anymore

What's in your wallet? If it's an American Express card and you're on your way to Costco, you may want to turn around and head for Walmart or Target. This is the day that Costco dumps Amex for Visa.

Costco and Amex spent 16 good years together but, as sometimes happens with relationships, it just sort of fizzled out over time. And now, just as when humans split the blanket, the rest of us are left to deal with the fall-out.

Costco members who previously had a Costco-issued American Express card should by now have received a new Costco/Citi Visa card in the mail -- officially called the Costco Anywhere Visa card.

Those who have been using a non-Costco Amex? Well, they're out of luck. The only credit card being accepted at Costco today is Visa. It doesn't have to be from Citi, but it must be a Visa. 

Debit cards are OK, whether they're Mastercard or Visa. Costco cash cards are also OK, as are checks, cash, and EBT. But not the spurned American Express. Costco has, in effect, taken out a restraining order barring Amex cards from its check-out lanes. 

Costco advises customers left in the lurch to apply for the Citi Visa. If that includes you, you can do so at Costco.com, or by calling 1-800-324-3098. 

Some Costco customers have noted that the warehouse chain has not exactly deluged them with information about the switch. A brief email today said:

Starting today, Costco begins accepting all Visa credit cards, including the new Costco Anywhere Visa® Card by Citi, both in the warehouse and at Costco gas stations.

American Express® cards will no longer be accepted.

Short and sweet. Anyone who didn't happen onto the news through news reports or dumb luck might well be taken by surprise. Costco is notoriously stingy with information and has nothing at all in its press section about today's changeover other than glowing projections aimed at investors. 

Some longtime Costco customers have vowed to go elsewhere, saying they simply don't want to give up their existing credit cards.

"I'm a small business person and my American Express card is the only one I ever use for business expenses. I'll be damned if I'll take on the bother and risk of another card just to keep Costco happy," said an internet entrepreneur who said he had been a Costco member for "decades" but said he would cancel his Costco membership and do more of his business-related shopping at Amazon.

Stirrings of discontent

Other consumers upset about the change include a consumer named Robert, who emailed us about it today. 

"I have closed my Costco account and just spent over an hour on the phone canceling my Citi Bank Visa card," Robert said. "This will now impact my credit rating for closing both the new Visa and American Express Card. (American Express representative told me months ago that they would be closing my current AMX/Costco card and I would get a new AMX card. It now turns out, that is not true)."

We asked Robert why he didn't keep the Visa card. "I did not want another Visa card, especially from Citi Bank. I wanted my Amex card, with or without Costco. I had my Amex card long before it was tied to Costco," he said. "Mostly, I don't care for anyone deciding for me which credit cards I'll possess." 

Glen of Fairfield, Calif., is unhappy with his new Citi card because it carries the RFID symbol, four wavy lines meant to symbolize radio waves.

"It's an indicator that this card is capable of transmitting your card's data 24/7. All it takes is some creep, with the right equipment, to copy your card's data and cause you credit problems for years to come," Glen said in a ConsumerAffairs review. "I'm not fond of anything that is actively transmitting my info and I think it's unfair that I must buy or provide a protective sleeve or 'special' wallet to prevent the capture of my data."

RFID not too unusual

RFID cards are not all that unusual. An industry newsletter, the Nilson Report, estimates there are 35 million chip cards in circulation in the U.S. All three major U.S. credit card companies issue them, although the technology is more widely used by transit agencies to provide quick service at subway entrances. The technology is also becoming popular for security applications -- ID cards that admit their users to selected secure areas, for example. 

How vulnerable the cards are to fraud depends on who you ask. Consumer Reports warned back in 2011 that the information on your card could be used to make unauthorized purchases and said that the equipment needed to intercept RFID transmission was readily available for less than $100.

The advantage of RFID cards is that they are "contactless," meaning you don't have to swipe or insert your card in a reader, assuming you're at one of the few retailer locations using the technology. They're used mostly by retailers with lots of low-amount sales -- newsstands, coffee shops, and so forth, where customers tend to be in a hurry. 

What's in your wallet? If it's an American Express card and you're on your way to Costco, you may want to turn around and head for Walmart or Target. This...

Article Image

Credit scores: what you don't know could hurt you

First, the good news. Most consumers understand the basics of credit scores and how they work.

An annual survey by the Consumer Federation of America (CFA) shows about 80% of Americans know that credit scores are important and are a major factor in whether people get a mortgage or a credit card.

But the survey also reveals some significant knowledge gaps. For one thing, consumers very often underestimate the cost of having a low credit score. Just 22% of respondents knew that a low score could increase the cost of a 60 month auto loan of $20,000 by up to $5,000.

More than half were unaware that credit scores are also used by businesses and organizations that are not in the business of extending credit. Businesses like insurance companies.

Effect on car insurance rates

In an independent study, the personal finance site WalletHub found that consumers with absolutely no credit rating paid 53% more on average for car insurance than someone with an excellent credit score. In some states the rate spread was as high as 122%.

The study found that Farmers Insurance relies on credit scores the most in setting auto insurance rates. Geico relies the least on credit data.

WalletHub said it obtained quotes for two hypothetical consumers who were identical, expect for credit score. One had no credit score while the other possessed an excellent credit profile.

While it is important for a consumer with a poor credit history to know which companies place the most importance on credit scores, WalletHub said that information is more accessible from some companies more than others. It found Travelers to be the most transparent about its use of credit information when setting rates. It said State Farm is the least transparent.

Other uses of credit scores

In addition to insurance rates, CFA says credit scores are often used by utility companies to determine whether a new customer is required to place a deposit for service. Cellphone providers and landlords also consider credit information when evaluating a potential customer or tenant.

Here are some other key facts about credit scores:

  • Credit scores are negatively affected by missed or late payments
  • Carrying a balance that approaches your credit card's limit will reduce your credit score
  • Cancelling a credit card will lower your credit score
  • Paying every bill on time, every time is the fastest way to raise a credit score
  • Paying off your credit card balance each month helps raise your credit score

“The good news is that consumers understand the basics of credit scores, such as the importance of making loan payments on time,” said Stephen Brobeck, CFA’s executive director. “The bad news is that this knowledge is limited and, each year, can cost them hundreds of dollars in fees on services and additional interest on consumer loans.”  

First, the good news. Most consumers understand the basics of credit scores and how they work.An annual survey by the Consumer Federation of America (C...

Article Image

Police can now strip the money right off your card

Carrying a lot of cash is dangerous. Criminals may take it and so may the cops, who increasingly view having a lot of cash as evidence of wrongdoing. But now, police have added a new twist -- they've started using a scanner that lets them swipe the money right off prepaid cards.  

The device is called an ERAD -- Electronic Recovery and Access to Data machine, and Oklahoma's state police began using 16 of them last month. Hundreds of other police departments around the country are also using the device but haven't fessed up to it. 

It's all pretty simple. If a state trooper or other police officer suspects you are tied to some type of crime, he can scan your prepaid cards and seize the money on them. No formal charges, no trial, no due process.

It's an extension of a long-standing practice of shaking down anyone police think is suspicious. All too often, as the Washington Post demonstrated in a Pulitzer Prize-winning investigation a few years ago, all you need to do to look suspicious is have a lot of money.

"Different factors"

The police, of course, say the process is completely straightforward.

"We're gonna look for different factors in the way that you're acting,” Oklahoma Highway Patrol Lt. John Vincent said, according to a Washington Post report. “We're gonna look for if there's a difference in your story. If there's some way that we can prove that you're falsifying information to us about your business."

Of course, when Lt. Vincent says police will "prove" you're falsifying information it doesn't mean they'll prove it in court, where you can confront the witnesses and challenge the evidence. And that's what has critics upset.

State Sen. Kyle Loveless (R-Oklahoma City) said he will introduce legislation in the next session of the state legislature that will require a conviction in a court of law before anyone's assets are seized.

"If I had to err on the side of one side versus the other, I would err on the side of the Constitution,” Loveless said. “And I think that's what we need to do."

Loveless said there have been too many documented cases of abuse in Oklahoma to allow police to continue treating citizens as criminals without benefit of trial.

"We've seen single mom's stuff be taken, a cancer survivor his drugs taken, we saw a Christian band being taken. We've seen innocent people's stuff being taken. We've seen where the money goes and how it's been misspent," Loveless told a local television station.

Where it goes

As for what happens to the money seized with ERAD, 7.7% of it goes to the ERAD Group, a Texas-based company. The rest? Oklahoma Watch, an investigative journalism organization, says records show that in one recent year, 70% of all forfeiture amounts were used to fund salaries for law enforcement. 

Oklahoma law currently allows police and prosecutors to keep the money they take from citizens, even those who are never convicted or indicted, so those victimized by modern-day highway robbers basically have no recourse.

The Post's series caused a stir when it was published, but progress in cleaning up the practice has been slow. New Mexico, Montana and New Hampshire recently passed laws requiring a conviction before property can be forfeited, although the Post says New Mexico police routinely ignore the law.

The ERAD devices, by the way, can strip money off prepaid cards, but they can also decipher quite a bit of information from the magnetic strips on credit and debit cards, information police could conceivably use to track down and swipe additional assets.

ERAD claims its devices are an invaluable tool in fighting money laundering. 

"Each year, there are about $120 billion dollars moved to Mexico, Iran, Colombia, China as well as others as a result of illicit activity in the US," ERAD says on its website. "Prepaid debit cards are becoming the preferred process to move funds for pick up in these countries."

No right to privacy

ERAD CEO T. Jack Williams claimed recently at a conference that American citizens have no right to privacy when it comes to magnetic encoding on their cards, Oklahoma Watch reported.

“Prepaid cards are cash, they are not bank accounts,” Williams said. He claimed that prepaid cards are not protected by the Bank Secrecy Act and are not protected by the Constitution's Fourth Amendment protections against unreasonable search and seizure.

Brady Henderson, legal director for ACLU Oklahoma, says that's debatable and predicted Oklahoma's Department of Public Safety will find itself facing legal challenges to warrantless search and seizures using ERAD.

The situation is not unique to Oklahoma. The ERAD devices are in use around the country by "hundreds" of police agencies, Williams said, although he refused to give an exact number or name any of the police departments using the devices. 

Carrying a lot of cash is dangerous. Criminals may take it and so may the cops, who increasingly view having a lot of cash ...

Article Image

Best credit cards for rental car coverage

Your credit card can get you more than cash back on purchases and points toward perks. Most provide some basic rental car insurance. Some coverage is better than others.

But to make it pay, a cardholder first needs to know it exists, and then what it covers. Progressive Insurance has found that about 20% of rental car customers always pay for the damage waiver, with another 20% doing so occasionally. But since all rental car payments are made with credit cards, it is very likely most of those purchases are unnecessary.

The credit card review site CardHub has analyzed credit cards, choosing the ones that provide the most coverage for rental cars. Among individual cards, it found the cards issued by CitiGroup provide the most extensive rental car coverage.

Citi cards achieved a score of 95.5%, with American Express' 89.5% being the closest competitor. Chase cards are third, with a score of 87.5%.

MasterCard is best

Cards in the MasterCard network provide the best coverage, but all four networks are ranked fairly close together in their coverage.

The top ranked cards don't require you to sign up for the coverage. It is activated when you decline the rental car company's damage loss waiver. The best cards cover costs stemming from damage to or theft of rental vehicles, up to $100,000.

Like any insurance policy, there are some exclusions. Here's where it pays to have one of the higher-rated cards, because they have fewer exceptions to their coverage.

The average card won't cover a truck, open-bed vehicle, exotic or antique car, or even a large van or full-size SUV. The best cards do cover those vehicles, but draw the line at off-road vehicles. Another common exclusion is tire and rim damage. CardHub found that more than 60% of cards don't cover it.

Almost 40% of cards only cover domestic rentals for up to 15 days, but the best cards will extend coverage up to 31 days.

Fewer global options

You're safe with just about any card if you are renting in the U.S., but only Citi and Discover cards provide global coverage. Ireland, Israel and Jamaica are the most common exclusions among other issuers.

There is something else to understand about rental car coverage. Neither the company's damage loss waiver nor your credit card's coverage will protect you from liability in the case of an accident. You'll need to buy a liability supplement or rely instead on your personal auto insurance policy.

It should cover you but not all policies do. It is a good idea to call your insurance provider before renting a car and asking.

Your credit card can get you more than cash back on purchases and points toward perks. Most provide some basic rental car insurance. Some coverage is bette...

Article Image

Chase Sapphire Preferred wins honors as best travel card

If you were to choose a credit card solely for use to pay travel expenses, CreditCards.com recommends the Chase Sapphire Preferred card.

The credit card website says the Chase Sapphire Preferred came out on top in its latest rankings. It won points for the 50,000 points cardholders get just for opening an account.

It also won praise for ease in cashing in those points and its collection of rewards the judges described as “user friendly.”

Popular card

There is no doubt the Sapphire Preferred is a popular card. Back in March it ranked very high when ConsumerAffairs rated the best reward cards, singled out for its many travel-related perks.

We pointed out that to earn the 50,000 bonus points, new customers needed to charge $4,000 on the card in the first three months the account is open. Those points are good for $625 toward airfare and lodging when you redeem them through Chase Ultimate Rewards.

On the downside, the card carries a $95 annual fee, but it is waived the first year. After that it costs you nearly $100 to carry this card, so you have to take advantage of the rewards to make it pay.

The CreditCards.com judges were also impressed that customers who dine out frequently can easily rack up extra bonus points.

“Hit the sweet spot”

"The Chase Sapphire Preferred card has hit the sweet spot for the frequent but not constant traveler," says CreditCards.com Editor-in-Chief and travel card judge Daniel Ray.

He notes the sign-up bonus provides a generous head start and a frequent traveler can easily accumulate valuable points.

Placing second in the competition is Capital One's Venture Rewards card. It gained points for its low interest rates and consumer-friendly redemption policy.

Coming in third was the Barclaycard Arrival Plus World Elite MasterCard. It impressed judges by granting cardholders two miles for every dollar they spend. On top of that, it comes with a generous 40,000-mile bonus.

If you were to choose a credit card solely for use to pay travel expenses, CreditCards.com recommends the Chase Sapphire Preferred card.The credit card...

Article Image

Costco's switch to Visa from Amex doesn't sit well with everyone

Editor's note: This story has been revised to include corrected information on Citi's payment terms and to add comment from a Canadian consumer.

June 20 is fast approaching. That's the date when Costco will stop accepting American Express cards and start insisting that customers use Visa credit or debit cards, checks, cash, EBT and Costco cash cards. 

The change has been promoted as being a bonanza for customers, who will be getting bigger cashback credits and a few other perks. But some eagle-eyed consumers aren't so sure. 

"Hidden in a large multi-page letter is the fact that the new Citi Visa interest is compounded daily on any charges made. So, if you charge an item, there is no grace period," Bonnie of Concord, California, noted in a recent ConsumerAffairs review. "I think it's no accident that it is buried and they are counting on it not being noticeable."

Bonnie emailed Costco about it and received a reply telling her to take it up with Citi. "Costco dropped Amex who allowed the customer to pay the bill in full by the due date and it is interest free, not so with the new card," she said.

However, Bonnie may have been too harsh in her assessment. The terms and conditions that accompany the card state that if the cardholder pays the entire amount due within 23 days, there will be no interest charged.

The confusion is typical of that encountered by many customers who have been trying to navigate the switch and the always-secretive Costco doesn't provide much help.

Stranded snowbirds

Also feeling left out in the cold are Canadians who spend the winter in the U.S. We heard from Dave of British Columbia, who makes his way to Arizona each winter. 

"Costco Canada switched from AMEX to Capital One Mastercard (which also serves as our membership card). So although our membership card is accepted in U.S. stores, it still means we won't be able to charge items anymore."

Dave took it up with Costco but got nowhere. 

"The effect will be a drastic reduction in our expenditures at Costco -- already they lost about $ 20K US in purchases over the last year -- but when I emailed them they didn't seem to care.

Forex fee

Frank of Burlington, Vermont, takes issue with the foreign exchange fee on the new card. "Any card that claims to be an 'anywhere' card and charges a rip-off 3% foreign exchange fee is being deceitful and dishonest," he said.

Frank also complained that the switch to Visa will affect his credit score.

"The credit limit on this card is $6,800 less than on my Costco/AMEX card which it replaces. It will change my ratio of credit available to credit utilized thus lowering my credit score. Watch out and complain if this happens to you."

The switchover hasn't been exactly a bonanza for Costco either, at least not yet. The company recently said it has lost about $40 million since it stopped taking new card sign-ups last fall. Executives have been telling Wall Street analysts that things will turn around quickly once the transition is completed, but Motley Fool advises investors to keep a careful eye on Costco's bottom line over the next few quarters to see what effect the change is having. 

Unaccounted for

Then there are the Costco members who have been members for years but never had a Costco-issued card. One small business owner we talked to said he has two cards -- an American Express for business use and a high-limit/low-interest-rate Mastercard for personal use. He does not want another card to keep track of and so never applied for a Costco Amex.

"So what happens to me June 20?" he asked. "Costco had no problem taking my annual executive membership fee but no one has bothered to tell me how I am supposed to buy anything after June 20. I certainly don't intend to use cash and I haven't written a physical check in a store in years." 

The answer for him, he said, will be Amazon. 

June 20 is fast approaching. That's the date when Costco will stop accepting American Express cards and start insisting that customers use Visa credit or d...

Article Image

Alaska Air expands credit card benefits

Alaska Airlines has made a couple of benefit changes to its Visa Signature Card. The credit card no longer carries foreign transaction fees, and bonus miles for new customers have been increased to 30,000, as long as the new cardholders meet the qualifying spending level.

"As we continue to expand our global partnerships and add to our growing list of more than 800 partner destinations worldwide, eliminating foreign transaction fees is the right thing to do for our world-traveling cardholders,” said Sangita Woerner, Alaska's vice president of marketing.

The expanded perks are in addition to the other benefits the card carries, including a free checked bag for the cardholder and six others included in his or her party; three times the miles on Alaska Air purchases; and an annual companion fare for $121.

Alaska Air's mileage plan currently features 17 international and domestic airline partners, flying to more than 800 global destinations. Alaska Air says its mileage plan was rated number one among airline rewards programs by U.S. News.

It should be noted that an airline credit card is probably not the best choice for people who rarely travel by air. While there are other rewards associated with the cards, the most lucrative are associated with air travel.

Other options

For example, the Frontier Airlines Credit Card is another attractive choice. Right off the bat, new cardholders earn 40,000 bonus miles after spending $500 the first 90 days the account is open. Those 40,000 bonus miles are good for two round-trip domestic tickets, subject to availability.

Customers earn double miles per $1 spent on Frontier Airlines purchases and one mile per $1 spent on all other purchases.

Customers earn a $100 Frontier Airlines flight discount voucher after spending $2,500 or more in purchases during the card membership year.

For consumers who do not travel by air that much, a rewards card with a generous cash back feature is the better choice. Here are some options to consider.

Alaska Airlines has made a couple of benefit changes to its Visa Signature Card. The credit card no longer carries foreign transaction fees, and bonus mile...

Article Image

Wells Fargo launches new loan program for first time homebuyers

Today, Wells Fargo launched yourFirstMortgage: a new home loan program that will offer first-time home buyers a down payment of as little as 3% for fixed-rate mortgages.

The program also offers lower out-of-pocket costs, expanded credit criteria, and incentives for homebuyer education to help first-time homebuyers (and others) enter the realm of sustainable homeownership.

TheStreet reports that Wells Fargo (WFC) shares are up 0.21% to $50.61 following Thursday’s launch of the new home loan program.

Breaking down barriers

Other loans offer low down payment options, but Wells Fargo says their program is different. Barriers related to complex criteria often prevent qualified borrowers from moving forward with the loan process, but yourFirst Mortgage aims to make things easy.

“We wanted to provide access to credit and simplify the experience while maintaining responsible lending practices,” said Brad Blackwell, executive vice president of Wells Fargo Home Lending in a statement.

Blackwell explains that teaming up with credit experts such as Fannie Mae and Self-Help is enabling Wells Fargo to provide homebuyers with a loan option that is as affordable as it is easy to understand.

Expanding sustainable homeownership

In addition to lower down payments and out-of-pocket costs, the yourFirst Mortgage program will encourage buyers to make informed decisions.

Prospective homebuyers who have a down payment of less than 10% can earn a ⅛-percent interest rate reduction after they complete a homebuyer education course.  

In addition, the loan program will expand credit history to include nontraditional sources like tuition, rent, or utility bill payments. The income of others in the household will also be considered.

“For people of modest means, homeownership is the most effective path to building wealth and stability,” said Martin Eakes, Self-Help CEO and co-founder. “We are eager to partner with Wells Fargo and Fannie Mae to spur more homeownership opportunities for deserving borrowers.”

Today, Wells Fargo launched yourFirstMortgage: a new home loan program that will offer first-time home buyers a down payment of as little as 3% for fixed-r...

Article Image

Walmart sues Visa to require PIN use with chip credit cards

Walmart, the nation's largest retailer, has filed a lawsuit in New York against Visa, charging that the payments network had blocked implementation of a PIN system, favored by retailers, to make the new chip credit cards more secure.

The suit, filed in the New York State Supreme Court, alleges the current system, in which a chip card user authenticates the purchase with a signature, is “fraud prone.”

Fortune quotes a Walmart spokesperson as saying Visa's influence in the adoption of the signature authentication system creates “unacceptable risk.”

Unhappy retailers

On October 1, 2015, when the new system took effect, liability for fraudulent credit card purchases flipped from credit card companies to merchants.

Walmart's position appears to represent that of retailers in general, who have not been happy with the newly implemented chip card system. Many have been slow to install the new readers that extract information from a chip embedded in the plastic, rather than from a magnetic strip on the back.

Just days after the new chip cards, known as EMV cards, went into use, the National Retail Federation (NRF) took its case to Congress, arguing that the new chip-and-signature credit cards that do not also require a PIN won't stop fraud. It said small businesses should not be pressured to install the new equipment.

“The new EMV equipment does not stop breaches,” NRF Senior Vice President for Government Relations David French said in October 2015 testimony before the House Small Business Subcommittee. “Indeed, in many cases it provides no significant benefits either to the business or to the business’ regular customers. It is merely an additional expense small businesses are being told to bear.”

FBI also supports a PIN

The retailers weren't alone in their early concerns about the new cards. The FBI issued a statement within days of the new cards becoming active, warning law enforcement officers, merchants, and consumers to be aware that the EMV cards, while perhaps more secure than the cards they replaced, were still vulnerable to fraud.

The FBI noted that the chip allows a merchant to verify that the card is authentic and not one made by a fraudster with stolen credit card data. But the agency pointed out that wouldn't stop someone from using a chip card they had stolen. All they had to do was sign the name that was on the card. Requiring the user to provide a PIN, the FBI argued, would be more secure.

The following month, several state attorneys general echoed the FBI's concerns about the lack of a PIN. Attorneys general of eight states and the District of Columbia signed a letter to the nation’s top credit card companies and banks, calling for the use of PINs rather than signatures to approve purchases made with new chip-based credit cards.

So why don't the new chip cards require PINs? In its suit, Walmart says credit card companies balked at imposing the requirement, believing consumers would rebel at having to remember another password.

Walmart, the nation's largest retailer, has filed a lawsuit in New York against Visa, charging that the payments network had blocked implementation of a PI...

Article Image

Chase offers new rewards credit card

Chase is now advertising a new credit card, the Chase Freedom Unlimited Card, a companion to its Chase Freedom Preferred.

While the Preferred pays 1% cash back on most purchases, and 5% on rotating categories, the Unlimited, as its name implies, pays 1.5% cash back on an unlimited amount of everything, with no annual fee.

The card has four main features that make it attractive. First, the aforementioned 1.5% cash back on every purchase. Other cards usually have caps.

You can redeem for cash back at any time, and the rewards you rack up don't expire, assuming your account remains active.

Bonus cash

The card also pays a $150 bonus after you spend $500 during the first three months the account is open. If you add an authorized user, you earn another $25 reward, if that user also makes a purchase during the first three months.

The Unlimited also has a 15 month introductory rate of 0% APR on purchases. That would allow you to finance a significant purchase and pay for it over 15 months without paying any interest.

If you want to transfer a balance from another card, you get the same 15 month introductory period at 0% interest. However, there is a 5% balance transfer fee.

After the 0% introductory period, the variable interest rate on both purchases and balance transfers is 14.24%, 19.24%, or 23.24%, depending on creditworthiness.

Consumer protections

Like many credit cards, the Unlimited comes with some consumer protections. In case of fraud, the cardholder has zero liability. It also allows you to decline a rental car company's collision damage waiver, providing replacement coverage at no extra charge, as long as you use the card to pay the entire cost of the rental car.

There is also an insurance policy of sorts on new purchases. The Unlimited's Purchase Protection feature covers your new purchases for 120 days against damage or theft up to $500 per claim and $50,000 per account.

Its price protection feature can make sure you always get the best price. If a card purchase made in the U.S. is advertised for less in print or online within 90 days, you can receive the difference, up to $500 per item and $2,500 per year.

Chase is now advertising a new credit card, the Chase Freedom Unlimited Card, a companion to its Chase Freedom Preferred.While the Preferred pays 1% ca...

Article Image

Three credit cards for consumers with excellent credit

How's your credit score? If it is a number that's considered “excellent,” you shouldn't respond to just any random credit card offer.

If you do, you could be leaving money and services on the table. That's because credit card companies have cards for different levels of credit worthiness. They save the best benefits for consumers with excellent credit and, as a rule, have no annual fee.

Excellent credit, by the way, is considered a FICO score of between 750 and 850.

Chase Slate

The Chase Slate has a couple of features that make it an attractive choice. If you are carrying a balance on another card, you can transfer the balance to your Chase Slate card with no transfer fee, as long you do it during the first 60 days the account is open.

On the other hand, if you have an excellent credit score, you might not be carrying a balance, negating one of the card's primary benefits.

Another nice feature is a monthly FICO credit score, given at no charge. While there are several sites now that provide a “free credit score,” these scores are not always your FICO score, a proprietary formula that most lenders rely on to make credit decisions.

What you won't get with the Chase Slate are generous cash back rewards, so it might be wise to consider a rewards card instead if you don't need the balance transfer feature.

BankAmericard Cash Rewards

While there are many cash back rewards cards for consumers with excellent credit, the BankAmericard Cash Rewards card is definitely worth a look, especially if you are already a Bank of America customer.

Upon signing up, the card pays a $100 cash bonus after you spend $500 in the first 90 days the account is open. You earn 3% cash back at the gas pump, 2% at the supermarket, and 1% on all other purchases. In all, you can earn up to $1,500 in combined purchases each quarter.

If you are a Bank of America customer, you can get a 10% customer bonus every time you redeem your cash back into your checking or savings account. For Bank of America Preferred Rewards clients, that bonus can be 25% or more.

There are plenty of other good rewards cards. You can check out some of them here and here.

Citi Diamond Preferred

If you would like a lot of extra services with your credit card, then you might consider the Citi Diamond Preferred card. VIP treatment is its main attraction.

Cardmembers are entitled to 24/7 access to personalized concierge service, providing help in booking hotels, flights, and concert tickets.

It also has a fairly lengthy 0% introductory period for balance transfers – 21 months. However, there is a fee for these transfers, ranging from a minimum of $5 to a maximum of 3% of the transferred amount.

How's your credit score? If it is a number that's considered “excellent,” you shouldn't respond to just any random credit card offer.If you do, you cou...

Article Image

Dick's Sporting Goods relaunches rewards credit card

Sporting goods retailer Dick's Sporting Goods is relaunching its Rewards of Sport Credit Cards, issued by Synchrony Bank.

The company said it would continue to offer two different cards under the program. One – the Rewards of Sport Credit Card – remains a private label card for use at all Dick's Sporting Goods, Field & Stream, and Golf Galaxy locations.

The Rewards of Sport MasterCard is a more general purpose card. It can be used at all the same locations, in addition to any other retail location that accepts Mastercard.

Dick's says its cardholders will get some new benefits under the relaunch, including 10% back in rewards on in-store purchases the first day the account is active.

Periodically, consumers using the card may have the option of financing in-store purchases.

Cardholders will also still get upgraded ScoreCard Rewards benefits on purchases. They include 6% back in rewards on routine in-store purchases and 1% back in rewards on purchases in other stores where MasterCard is accepted. That benefit will apply only to Rewards of Sport MasterCard holders.

Other store-issued cards

Store-issued credit cards have become more common in recent years, with retailers using them as a means to build brand loyalty. Some are more rewarding than others, but consumers who choose a store-issued card should make sure the store is a place they shop frequently.

In its analysis of store-issued credit cards, Consumer Reports says most store-issued credit cards carry interest rates much higher than you would pay on other cards. If you are in the habit of paying the balance in full, each month, it's not really an issue.

Often retailers will offer an attractive discount of 15% or so on whatever you happen to be buying if you apply for their card on the spot. While that might be tempting if you are making a very large purchase, consumers should guard against opening too many credit card accounts because of the potential negative impact it can have on credit scores.

Sporting goods retailer Dick's Sporting Goods is relaunching its Rewards of Sport Credit Cards, issued by Synchrony Bank.The company said it would cont...

Article Image

Survey finds college students credit card knowledge lacking

In many cases, young people have their first experience with credit cards when they go off to college. Some handle the experience better than others.

Lendedu, a student loan marketplace, recently quizzed college students at three different four-year institutions about their credit card knowledge. The results suggest that colleges would do well to add a few personal finance courses to the curriculum.

Off the bat, the survey found that only 38.46% of the students it polled have a credit card in their own name. That means the rest either do not have a credit card or, more likely, use a card that is in their parents' name. As a result, these students never see a credit card bill and have less accountability.

The survey found only 9.44% of students knew the interest rate on their credit card. If you paid off your account in full each month, you would have no real need to know the rate. But the survey shows that, unfortunately, this is not the case.

Two-thirds carry a balance

A full two-third of students – 67.78% – carry a balance on their credit card, exposing them to mounting debt, in addition to any student loans they might have. Perhaps because so many students carry a balance, a fairly large percentage – 58.89% – knew precisely the credit limit on their card.

Not all students have credit cards, and the survey takers wondered why not. Forty-three percent said they had considered applying for a credit card, but had not done so.

Almost the same number admitted the reason they had not applied was the fear they would run up too much debt.

CARD Act

In years past, college freshmen were bombarded with credit card offers as soon as they moved into their dorms. In 2009, Congress passed the Credit Card Accountability, Responsibility and Disclosure (CARD) Act.

The Card Act enacted a number of reforms, including curbs on credit card marketing efforts targeting college students. Students still get credit cards but are under much less pressure to do so.

A credit card can be a useful financial tool if used properly. A rule of thumb is to never charge anything you can't pay for at the end of the month. If you pay the bill in full, you start each billing cycle with a clean slate and won't accumulate debt.

Several credit cards are specifically designed for people who are new to credit, with forgiving features to keep consumers out of trouble. We recently profiled three cards that could be good choices for students who are considering a credit card.

In many cases, young people have their first experience with credit cards when they go off to college. Some handle the experience better than others.Le...

Article Image

There are big differences between rewards credit cards

There are many rewards credit cards to choose from, and some rewards are better than others. But do you know how much better some are?

The personal finance website CardHub.com recently calculated what cardholders stand to get over a two year period, then did a side-by-side comparison. Over that two year period, the study found an $800 difference between the best and worst rewards.

According to the authors, Capital One offers the best credit card rewards program, with a score 49% higher than last place finisher TD Bank. The difference between the two programs is $812 over two years.

Capital One offers two Quicksilver rewards cards – the Quicksilver Card for excellent credit and the Quicksilver One Card for just average credit.

The Quicksilver Card for excellent credit provides unlimited 1.5% cash back on every purchase. In addition, there is a one-time $100 bonus if you spend $500 on purchases within the first three months.

The Quicksilver One Card is almost as rewarding. It has the same unlimited 1.5% cash back on every purchase but lacks the $100 bonus. It also charges a $39 annual fee while there is no fee with the Quicksilver Card.

By way of comparison, the TD Bank Visa Credit Card pays a $100 bonus when you spend $500 in the first 90 days. It also pays 2% on purchases from local delis, fast food restaurants, and coffee shops, as well as casual restaurants and fine dining, plus 1% on all other eligible purchases.

Most rewarding for travel

How you use your rewards can also make a difference in the benefits. For example, the study found using Capital One rewards for travel produced 54% more value than using the points for merchandise.

Ease of use for rewards is sometimes a major factor. The study found Discover has the most consumer-friendly redemption policies; Fifth Third Bank has the most restrictive policies.

The authors offer some advice for choosing a rewards card. They say to start with identifying where you tend to spend the most money and to find a card that rewards that particular activity. For example, if you rarely eat out, don't choose a card that weights its rewards toward restaurant spending.

Consider a card's earning potential, but don't overlook the redemption value. Both are important. Look for a nice balance between the two.

If you are not particularly detailed-oriented, choose a card with the fewest hassles. If you are undecided about which rewards suit you best, go with cash back. It's usually hard to beat cash.

Finally, don't overlook annual fees. Choosing a card with no annual fee will put you ahead. Paying an annual fee will cut into any rewards you might gain.

There are many rewards credit cards to choose from, and some rewards are better than others. But do you know how much better some are?The personal fina...

Article Image

First-time homebuyers worry about their credit scores

Shopping for a home is a pretty intimidating process, but a new report from Experian suggests that it is often even more so for today's first-time homebuyer.

It's hard enough to save for a down payment. Beyond that, however, the survey found that many consumers approaching the buying process for the first time worry about their credit score.

There may be good reason to worry. In the wake of the collapse of the housing market, mortgage underwriting standards have tightened considerably. Lenders are demanding higher scores from buyers than ever before.

In the Experian survey, 34% of would-be buyers expressed worry that their credit score might hurt their chances to obtain a loan. Another 45% said they would put off a home purchase to give themselves more time to raise their credit score.

"Your credit profile is one of the factors that can have a substantial impact on securing a home loan because it is used by lenders as an indicator of your financial health," Rod Griffin, director of Public Education at Experian, said in a release. "Consumers planning to purchase a home should check their credit scores and reports to see where they stand.”

Once consumers know their score, they pretty much know where they strand. From there, they can develop a financial plan that results in obtaining a mortgage.

Also determines interest rate

What many would-be buyers don't realize is that a credit score not only determines whether you will get a loan, it also determines the interest rate you will pay. An excellent credit score will usually qualify a borrower for the best rate.

According to Bankrate.com, a credit score of 740 or above will qualify you for the best rates. A score below 620 not only makes it less likely that you'll get a loan, but will saddle you with the highest interest rate.

The difference between the best and worst mortgage rate can be a swing of 1.5%. In terms of dollars and cents, on a $150 mortgage, that can mean a difference of $135 in the monthly payment, adding up to an extra $1,620 per year.

How to improve your credit score

If you are trying to improve your credit score so you can go home shopping, Fair Isaac, the company that produces credit scores, says there are three important things you can do:

Check your credit report: You can get a free copy at www.annualcreditreport.com. Download a copy from all three credit reporting agencies and check it for accuracy. If there are errors – and there can be – you'll need to get the information corrected.

Pay your bills on time: One of the biggest influences on your credit score is how reliable you are when it comes to paying your debts. Make sure all bills get paid, in full, on time.

Reduce your debt: If you have a large credit card balance, particularly if you have nearly maxed out your card, work on reducing it. You don't have to pay it down to zero, but the balance should not greatly increase your debt to income ratio. Showing you can manage debt will do wonders for your credit score.

Shopping for a home is a pretty intimidating process, but a new report from Experian suggests that it is often even more so for today's first-time homebuye...

Article Image

A 0% balance transfer card can save you thousands

If you are like most consumers, you are trying to pay off a balance on a credit card or two. Given the high interest rates on credit cards, that's often hard to do.

By transferring a balance from a high interest credit card to one that has no interest charges, the payoff can occur much faster. There are several credit cards that are specifically designed for balance transfers, giving the cardholder a few months of 0% interest.

Lately, these introductory periods have gotten longer, so if you are not taking advantage of them, you're leaving money on the table.

How much can you save? Let's do an experiment to find out.

Experiment

Let's suppose you have a $10,000 balance on a credit card that charges 15.9% interest. You have found $500 a month in your budget to apply to paying off the balance, so how many months will it take?

Using a credit card payment calculator at Bankrate.com, we discover that it will take two years – 24 months.

But suppose you were able to roll the entire $10,000 over to a credit card with 0% interest. Making the same $500 a month payment, you would pay off the balance in 20 months – four months sooner, saving $2,000 in interest payments.

But is any credit card going to give you 20 months of 0% interest? We know of two that will.

Citi Simplicity

The Citi Simplicity card offers a 0% rate on balance transfers for 21 months, meaning you would pay no interest during our hypothetical payoff period. Other perks of the Citi card include no late fees, no penalty rate, and no annual fee.

With just about any balance transfer card, there will be a fee involved in moving a balance from one card to another, which will cut into your interest savings. The Citi Simplicity card charges $5 or 3% of the transferred balance, whichever is greater.

In our experiment, that would amount to a fee of $300, meaning the total savings from the transfer would be $1,700.

Citi Diamond Preferred

The Citi Diamond Preferred card also has a 21-month 0% interest on balance transfers. Like the Simplicity card, it has no annual fee and charges the same balance transfer rate – $5 or 3% of the transferred balance.

Cardmembers also get 24/7 access to personalized concierge service, providing help in booking hotels and flights and finding entertainment.

Both cards are good options for saving on interest costs while paying off debt. However, you'll need a pretty good credit score to get either one.

If you want to avoid a balance transfer fee, the Chase Slate is the card for you. The 0% interest introductory period is a little shorter – 15 months instead of 21 – but there is no fee to move the balance. Credit score requirements are also a bit less than for the two Citi cards.

If you are like most consumers, you are trying to pay off a balance on a credit card or two. Given the high interest rates on credit cards, that's often ha...

Article Image

What you should know about your credit report and score

To understand money, it helps to understand credit. Today, big ticket items, like homes and cars, usually require a loan in order to purchase them.

Every consumer who has opened a credit account somewhere has a credit report and a credit score. Understanding both can help you be a better money manager. The Federal Reserve has compiled this helpful consumer guide.

Your credit report tells your credit history. It lists all the credit accounts you have, or had in the past. It indicates what the balance is and whether they are in good standing.

It will also show any existing public record involving you and your finances. If there is a court judgment against you, tax liens against your property, or bankruptcy, they will show up in your credit report.

A credit report will also contain a list of people or companies that recently requested a copy of your credit report.

Why it's important

Here's why your credit report is important: banks, insurance companies, prospective employers, and a lot of other people you interact with may get a copy of your credit report. What they look for is evidence of how you manage money.

A lender looks at your credit report to decide whether or not to lend you money. Insurance companies may adjust your rate depending on what they see in your credit report.

Prospective employers, if you give permission for them to review your credit report, may base their decision on whether or not to hire you by what they see in your credit report.

Service providers and landlords will also take a look at your credit report before doing business with you, so having a clean report is important.

The information contained in your credit report is used to assign you a credit score. That way, someone reviewing your credit history knows at a glance whether you have excellent credit or just fair.

Adding up your credit score

There are a number of factors that go into a credit score, but perhaps the most important – and the one you can most easily control – is whether you pay your bills on time. Paying every bill on time, every month, will push up your credit score faster than anything you can do. Having one or more debt collection actions against it will drag it down faster than anything else.

Having too many accounts open – or too few – can bring down a score. Tapping out the credit limit on a credit card will do the same.

By law, every consumer is entitled to review copies of his or her credit report compiled by all three credit reporting agencies each year. It's free, and you can start the process at www.annualcreditreport.com.

Getting a copy of your FICO credit score is not free, but can usually be obtained for a small fee.

To understand money, it helps to understand credit. Today, big ticket items, like homes and cars, usually require a loan in order to purchase them.Ever...

Article Image

Consumers missing the boat on travel rewards credit cards

When it comes to travel rewards credit cards, when you apply can make a big difference. At certain times of the year the rewards are much greater.

NerdWallet's 2016 Travel Credit Card Study shows most consumers are oblivious to this fact and are leaving an average of 15,338 rewards points on the table by applying for a card at the wrong time. That works out to an average of $177 in lost value.

Sean McQuay, NerdWallet's credit card expert, says consumers may love travel credit cards, but they aren't making the most of them.

Limited time offers

"Many consumers know that signing up for a travel card means getting a sign-up bonus, but most don't realize that there are limited-time offers that often push those sign-up bonuses up by an average of nearly $200 and that those offers follow a seasonal pattern every year,” McQuay said in a statement.

But by signing up at an optimal time, he says consumers can significantly improve the value of their credit card.

For general travel, November is the best month to sign up based on the sign up bonus. Despite that, the study found most consumers sign up for this type of card in July. As a result, NerdWallet estimates about 91% of consumers miss out on maximum rewards.

November is also the best month to sign up for an airline rewards card, but the study found that most consumers sign up for them in January.

For a hotel rewards card, the best time to sign up is August. Unfortunately, most consumers sign up for one in April, missing out on the maximum bonus.

Wait five months

It usually is not a good idea to sign up for a travel credit card just for a specific trip. In fact, it pays to wait at least five months between the time you get the credit card and when you take a trip. That's because many cards require a minimum amount of spending before the maximum reward kicks in.

But McQuay says if you are not currently earning rewards, it may be advantageous to take the current sign-up offer to make sure you begin accruing rewards immediately.

“Ultimately, only you can make the best decision about when you apply for a credit card," he said.

When it comes to travel rewards credit cards, when you apply can make a big difference. At certain times of the year the rewards are much greater.NerdW...

Article Image

Three good credit cards for students

Not all credit cards are alike, and some are better than others for certain periods of life. When you're young, it pays to have a credit card that takes that into account.

Fortunately, there are several credit cards designed specifically for young people still in school. Here are three pretty good ones.

Discover It Chrome for Students

The Discover It Chrome for Students has some forgiving features that might come in handy. There is no annual fee, no fee for going over your limit, no foreign transaction fee, and no late fee on first late payment. In fact, a late payment won't raise your interest rate, as it would with most other cards.

The rewards are pretty good too. You'll get 2% cash back at restaurants and gas stations, capped at $1,000 spending on the combined categories. You'll get 1% back on all other purchases.

Currently, Discover will match all the cash back received in the first year for new cardholders. It will also reward students for hitting the books, adding $20 cash back each school year your GPA is at least 3.0.

Freeze-It is a nice security feature, allowing you to prevent new purchases, cash advances, and balance transfers on misplaced cards instantly, using a mobile app or PC.

Wells Fargo Cash Back College Visa

The Wells Fargo Cash Back College Visa Card is another credit card that can benefit a young person with limited credit history. You can build your credit as you use the card – as long as you use it responsibly. There is no annual fee.

You can also rack up a few rewards along the way, earning 3% cash rewards on gasoline, groceries, and drug store purchases the first six months you have the card and 1% cash back on virtually all other net purchases.

Cash rewards can be redeemed in $25 increments and you can set it up so that the money is deposited into a Wells Fargo savings account. You can also apply the money to a qualifying Wells Fargo credit account or receive a check.

Journey Student Rewards card from Capital One

The Journey Student Rewards card from Capital One is another good choice for someone starting out to build a positive credit profile. You get 1% Cash back on everything you buy and there's no annual fee, so you are already ahead of the game.

Beyond that, Journey will send you text alerts so you know when your payment is due. Make the payment on time and Journey will give you a 25% bonus on the cash you've earned.

Not all credit cards are alike, and some are better than others for certain periods of life. When you're young, it pays to have a credit card that takes th...

Article Image

Car shoppers getting new tool to check their credit

Equifax and Black Book Avtivator are teaming up to give consumers an easy way to check their credit score before heading to a car dealer. The tool – Black Book Activator eCredit – will be accessible on participating dealer websites.

The tool will allow car shoppers to check their Equifax Risk Score at no charge. While it isn't the consumer's FICO score, generally regarded as the industry standard, Equifax says its score is a key measurement that can help consumers better understand the financing options they will be offered.

Knowing your credit score going into a vehicle transaction is generally regarded as an important piece of knowledge. A good score should get you a good rate. A lower score may limit your financing options.

The information provided by the new tool is both instant and private. Equifax says it is not shared with third parties, including the dealer. The dealer will access the consumer's FICO score if and when the financing process begins.

Social Security number unnecessary

Equifax says using the new tool will also be secure. Unlike some sites providing free credit ratings, users will not have to enter Social Security numbers. The tool only needs a name, address and a couple of answers to a multiple choice quiz, to verify the identity of the user.

"Our testing and consumer feedback have shown that car shoppers want access to their credit scores as they are making buying decisions, but until now, there hasn't been a simple, non-intrusive way for auto shoppers to get an instant, accurate score without sharing a lot of detailed information," Mike McFall, president of Black Book Activator Division, said in a release."Working closely with Equifax, we've created an easy plug-in for dealers, and a truly risk-free way for consumers to gain insight about which vehicles might make the most sense for their budgets, moving them one step closer to purchase."

Market testing

The tool has been tested with several dealers before the rollout. Frances Looper, Internet Manager at Love Chevrolet in Columbia, S.C., says the tool is helpful for a dealer that makes its initial contact with prospective customers online.

“As a bonus, users don't leave our site to get the information, and they don't feel as if their privacy has been compromised,” she said. “It makes everything friendlier.”

Your credit score not only determines what kind of loan you receive, it may determine whether you can actually get a loan. Carfax notes that auto lenders generally have a more flexible definition of excellent credit than mortgage lenders.

It says a minimum credit score to finance a used car might be 640 to 680, depending on the dealer. Below that, you might be assigned a subprime loan, with rates three to five times higher than prime borrowers.

Credit score benchmarks are generally higher for new car loans.

Equifax and Black Book Avtivator are teaming up to give consumers an easy way to check their credit score before heading to a car dealer. The tool – Black...

Article Image

Citi unveils Costco Go Anywhere credit card

In early March, Costco announced it had entered into a new credit card agreement with Citi to replace its current co-branded American Express card. Now, Citi has announced that the launch date for its new Costco card will be June 20.

Once issued, the Citi Visa Costco Go Anywhere credit card will serve as the Costco membership card, while providing rewards to users in the U.S. and Puerto Rico.

Citi says the new Costco Visa cards will be mailed in May. Costco members should follow the directions for activating the card but should keep using their current American Express card until the switch-over on June 20.

Rewards

Citi says its new Costco card will allow users to earn 4% cash back on eligible gasoline purchases, including at Costco pumps. The 4% reverts to 1% after $7,000 in gas purchases in a given year.

The card will pay 3% cash back at restaurants and eligible travel purchases. It pays 2% cash back on Costco purchases and 1% everywhere else.

Citi says Costco members who currently use the American Express card do not have to apply for the new Visa card. It will automatically be sent to members, who should destroy the Costco American Express card on June 20.

Current points

But what about any rewards that members may have piled up from American Express? Citi says customers won't lose them.

“Rewards that were not previously distributed to you will be transferred automatically to your new card on June 20, 2016, so you won’t lose any of the rewards you’ve already earned,” Citi said on its website. “Your February 2017 cash back rewards coupon from Citi will include cash back rewards earned on your Costco card from American Express during 2016 that were not previously distributed to you by American Express.”

However, if your Costco card from American Express earned Membership Rewards points, they will not transfer to your new card.  

In early March, Costco announced it had entered into a new credit card agreement with Citi to replace its current co-branded American Express card. Now, Ci...

Article Image

Credit cards can help insure your rental car

When you travel, your credit card may offer a number of rewards, ranging from miles to cash back. A very useful reward is insurance coverage at the car rental counter.

Most consumers have been confronted with the question – do you want the rental car company's coverage? It's pricey, often costing $25 or more a day.

Actually, it isn't even insurance. It's technically a “collision damage waiver (CDW),” meaning the rental car company will assume liability, up to a certain amount of money. Usually it's enough money to cover most accidents.

Credit card protection

Most credit cards will offer some level of protection, usually secondary protection – meaning it would pay if the costs exceed the primary coverage – either the CDW or the consumer's personal auto insurance.

If you want primary insurance coverage at no extra charge, then it may be to your advantage to pay for the car rental with a card that provides it, such as the Chase Sapphire Preferred Card.

“Decline the rental company's collision insurance and charge the entire rental cost to your card,” Chase says on its website. “Coverage is primary and provides reimbursement up to the actual cash value of the vehicle for theft and collision damage for most rental cars in the U.S. and abroad.”

As a bonus, you can earn two Ultimate Rewards points for every dollar spent on travel.

Two other options

The Discover Escape Card also provides primary rental car coverage. Discover says all you have to do is use the card to pay for the rental car and you're covered for damage to the car.

A third option is the Fairmont Visa Signature Card. It provides an Auto Rental CDW benefit that will reimburse for damage due to collision or theft up to the actual cash value of most rental vehicles.

It is also primary coverage, which means you do not have to file a claim with your personal insurance carrier.

There is one big caveat, however, to all of these options. As you may have noticed, they all address damage, not personal injuries. Should you be in a rental car accident resulting in injuries, you will need to rely on your personal auto insurance policy.

Before renting a car, it's a good idea to review your policy to see if there are any exclusions that apply to rental cars.

When you travel, your credit card may offer a number of rewards, ranging from miles to cash back. A very useful reward is insurance coverage at the car ren...

Article Image

Survey: 42% of retailers are still swiping credit cards

It's been six months since the official switch-over from magnetic strip credit cards to ones with embedded computer chips. The new EMV technology, used in many other parts of the world, is more secure.

While you may have received replacement cards with the embedded chips, you may not be finding many retailers where you can use them. Personal finance website CardHub.com has conducted a study, finding that 42% of retailers have not upgraded terminals in any of their stores.

The study authors call this “shocking,” since for the last six months, retailers have been liable for any fraudulent purchases made in their stores.

Waiting for certification

Retailers, meanwhile, say it isn't their fault. A spokesman for the National Retail Federation (NRF) recently told Yahoo Finance that once chip readers have been installed, the installation must be certified by the credit card industry. That process, he says, is taking longer than anyone expected.

The CardHub survey suggests consumers are either confused or ambivalent about the whole issue. Among the consumers questioned, 41% don't have an embedded chip credit card. More than half of consumers – 56% – didn't care if a retailer's terminal was EMV compliant.

Retailers have not been overly enthusiastic about the move to chip readers. For one thing, it means investing in new technology. For another, retailers have not been sold on the system's security.

Arguing for better security

As we reported in early October, the NRF urged adoption of an EMV system that requires a PIN, arguing that a simple signature is easily forged, negating the cards' enhanced security features.

The NRF also warned that if small businesses were forced to adopt EMV technology, alternatives like near-field communication contactless payment, mobile wallets, and other smartphone-based technology “may effectively be locked out of the market.”

According to the CardHub survey, about one-third of retailers in the survey have upgraded to chip readers at 90% to 100% of their stores. They include some of the nation's major retailers, such as Costco, CVS, and The Home Depot.

It's been six months since the official switch-over from magnetic strip credit cards to ones with embedded computer chips. The new EMV technology, used in...

Article Image

Credit card showdown: Chase Freedom vs. Blue Cash Preferred

The Chase Freedom Card and the Blue Cash Preferred Card from American Express are both very good cards to carry in your wallet. But which one is better?

Like many things, that's going to depend a lot on how you use a credit card. And since we are in the midst of March Madness, it might be appropriate to match the two credit cards in some head to head competition.

Chase Freedom Card

One of the nice things about the Chase Freedom Card is the very low spending threshold to earn an initial bonus. Spend just $500 during the first three months the account is open and you earn a $150 bonus.

In addition, you get 5% cash back on up to $1,500 of the purchases you make in bonus categories. Those categories include the kinds of places you are most likely to spend money, like restaurants, gas stations, and online retailers. You get 1% cash back everywhere else.

The card is also useful for balance transfers. There is an introductory 0% APR on both purchases and balance transfers during the first 15 months. Getting 0% for more than a year is exceptional.

What could make it better? Not having an annual fee – and it doesn't.

Blue Cash Preferred Card

The Blue Cash Preferred Card from American Express matches up well against the Chase Freedom, with an initial $150 bonus – but you'll have to spend twice as much to get it. However, there is a chance to get an additional 10% – up to $200 – back when you use the card at wireless telephone providers in the U.S. this year.

The day to day bonuses are also generous. The card pays 6% cash back at supermarkets, limited to $6,000 in spending per year. If you exceed that amount, the bonus drops back to 1%.

You can also use the Amex card for balance transfers. It offers an introductory 0% APR on both purchases and balance transfers for 12 months, three fewer months than the Chase Freedom.

The card gives you free access to your FICO score, which is a plus – but it has a $75 annual fee, which definitely isn't.

Close call

In this bracket, the contest between Chase Freedom and Blue Cash Preferred just might go to overtime. For consumers who buy gas and groceries, Blue Cash Preferred provides one of the best rewards out there.

But coming down to the final buzzer, Chase Freedom's three extra interest-free months, and the lack of an annual fee, allows it to escape with a narrow win.

Still, for consumers who don't need to rack up travel rewards, both are rewarding ways to pay for everyday expenses.

The Chase Freedom Card and the Blue Cash Preferred Card from American Express are both very good cards to carry in your wallet. But which one is better?...

Article Image

The four best airline credit cards

It should be noted upfront that an airline credit card won't be the best choice for most consumers. Unless you travel a lot, a card offering a generous cash-back reward is probably going to be your best option.

But for those who are frequent fliers, using a credit card associated with one of the airlines will help you rack up miles in a hurry.

Credit card website CardHub has updated its picks of the best airline credit cards, choosing four that have plenty of advantages for travelers.

Frontier Airlines Credit Card

The CardHub editors pick the Frontier Airlines Credit Card as tops in terms of the best initial bonus. Most credit cards will start you off with some miles, assuming you spend a certain amount in the first three months.

For Frontier credit card holders, you only have to spend $500 in the first 90 days. If you do, the credit card will give you 40,000 initial miles, which can be used right away for two round-trip domestic tickets.

There's a $69 annual fee and other cards offer more miles, but CardHub says the low qualification requirement, along with the relative ease in redeeming the miles, makes Frontier a good choice.

Platinum Delta SkyMiles Credit Card

If you travel a lot, you might want to check out the Platinum Delta SkyMiles Credit Card from American Express. Right off the bat you get a $100 statement credit if you make a Delta purchase in the first three months. If you spend $1,000 during that period, you'll get 35,000 bonus miles.

Other perks include a free checked bag on each trip, a free companion ticket each year, and priority boarding. The annual fee is on the high end – $195. However, there are no foreign transaction fees.

AeroMexico Visa Secured Credit Card

You say your credit has a few dents in it? Not to worry -- the AeroMexico Visa Secured Credit Card passes CardHub's test for the best airline card for consumers with below-average credit.

It's rare to find any kind of rewards card for applicants who do not have good or excellent credit histories, but the AeroMexico Card not only does, but offers 5,000 bonus miles and a free companion ticket after your first purchase. There's no annual fee the first year but $25 a year after that.

Rewards aren't limited to airline spending. The card offers two miles for every dollar spent on gas and groceries, one mile per dollar spent on all other purchases, and free checked bags when you use the card to fly AeroMexico. Because it is a secured card, there is a minimum $300 security deposit that is refundable at some point in the future.

United Mileage Plus Explorer Business Credit Card

For consumers who fly more for business than pleasure, CardHub recommends the United Mileage Plus Explorer Business Credit Card. It starts you off with 50,000 bonus miles if you spend $2,000 in the first three months and tacks on an additional 10,000 bonus miles if you charge at least $25,000 to your card.

It also adds two miles per $1 spent directly with United, as well as charges at gas stations, office supply stores, and restaurants.

There is no foreign transaction fee or a first-year annual fee the first year. After that, you'll be charged $95 a year.

There are also regular credit cards that provide airline miles as part of their overall rewards programs. The best overall, says Cardhub, is the Barclaycard Arrival Plus World Elite MasterCard. Its miles can be used with any airline.

It should be noted upfront that an airline credit card won't be the best choice for most consumers. Unless you travel a lot, a card offering a generous cas...

Article Image

Bankers warned about putting student loans into default when co-signer dies

There are many traps that await students seeking to finance their college education. One of the most common involves co-signers, usually the student's parents or grandparents.

Since they're a generation or two ahead of the student, it's not uncommon for co-signers to die before the loan has been paid off. When that happens, many lenders automatically declare the loan to be in default, leaving the borrower to either pay it off immediately or ruin their credit.

This, says an official at the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, may amount to an unfair and deceptive practice. 

Speaking at a Consumer Bankers Association conference in PhoenixTuesday, CFPB student loan ombudsman Seth Frotman said the bureau has found that many student loan contracts don't clearly spell out what happens if a co-signer dies or declares bankruptcy, the Washington Post reported.

Auto defaults

The so-called "auto defaults" often come as a complete surprise to the borrower, often when the lender refuses to accept a monthly payment and instead demands payment in full.

Frotman said the issue has come up before and some lenders have agreed not to enforce auto-default provisions in their contracts. But that promise is often hollow, he said, because loans are bought and sold regularly and future note holders may not abide by such promises.

“If the status quo persists, I am afraid we will continue to hear from borrowers who are subjected to this practice, and we will be having this same conversation for years to come—a situation I believe none of us want,” Frotman said, according to the Post report. 

No more bull

In a separate session at the bankers' conference, CBA president Richard Hunt said the bankers are tired of being kicked around by politicians on the campaign trail. 

"It is time that we shout from the tallest mountain and to the deepest valley, retail banking is alive and well, and we will not take any more bull from any politician who says otherwise," Hunt said. 

The bankers' choice

And lest you think that all bankers are raging free-market conservatives, Hillary Clinton edged out Donald Trump 52% to 48% in a mock election at the CBA conference. Eighty-five percent of the bankers, however, said they were uncomfortable with both candidates.

"I was relieved that Clinton won," said Alan McCabe, a senior vice president at Frost Bank who attended the conference. "Between Clinton and Trump, I'd vote for Clinton."

There are many traps that await students seeking to finance their college education. One of the most common involves co-signers, usually the student's pare...

Article Image

Banks tracking customers' cell phone locations to detect fraud

As long as your cell phone and your wallet are in the same place, a new security effort by banks should improve your protection against credit card fraud.

U.S. Bancorp is one of the first banks planning to use a new service that tracks the locations of customers' cell phones to ensure that credit card charges are legit, according to a Wall Street Journal report. The service will be offered on an opt-in basis.

The tracking will help banks detect when a card is not in the customers' possession, a prime indicator of potential fraud. That saves money for banks, which typically cover the costs of fraudulent transactions, and could also be a big convenience for clients whose charges might be declined when they're away from home.

Discover and USAA are also planning to adopt the program, according to the Journal, which says Visa has estimated the tracking could reduce unnecessary declines by 30%.

While the tracking raises privacy concerns, the banks say they will use the location information only for security, not for marketing purposes. Nevertheless, while both Visa and MasterCard are offering the tracking program, most banks are taking a wait-and-see attitude.

As long as your cell phone and your wallet are in the same place, a new security effort by banks should improve your protection against credit card fraud....

Article Image

Higher One to pay restitution to nearly one million college students

Nearly one million college students who received financial aid payments through Higher One, an institution-affiliated party of WEX Bank, were victims of deceptive practices, according to the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC).

The affected students will share $31 million in restitution, according to the terms of a settlement between the financial institutions and the government. In addition, the financial institutions will pay a total of nearly $4 million in civil penalties.

When colleges and universities hand out financial aid to students, they use a firm such as Higher One to actually make the payments. After tuition and fees are paid directly to the schools, the rest of the aid, such as money for books, supplies, and living expenses, can be disbursed to students through Higher One's "OneAccount."

The OneAccount is a debit card-based product that is offered in partnership through financial institutions. WEX Bank has offered the OneAccount since May 4, 2012, according to FDIC.

Omitted important facts

After an investigation, the FDIC concluded that the Higher One website and marketing materials, which were approved by WEX Bank, omitted important facts about certain fees, features, and limitations of the OneAccount in violation of the Federal Trade Commission Act.

Left out, the complaint alleges, were details about other disbursement methods available to students, a full and complete fee schedule, and the availability of fee-free ATMs. As a result of these material omissions, FDIC charges Higher One improperly collected $31 million in fees from students from May 4, 2012, to July 15, 2014, the period covered by the enforcement action.

"It is important that financial products offered to college students under the sponsorship of their universities are clear, transparent, and trustworthy," FDIC Chairman Martin J. Gruenberg said. "Today's action holds both the bank and its student card partner accountable for the practices related to the products they offered to college students and provides restitution to those students harmed by these practices."

In trouble before

This is not Higher One's first brush with regulators. In 2012, it was required to pay $11 million to 60,000 students over the ATM transaction fees it charged.

If you are an affected student, the FDIC says you do not have to take any action to collect compensation. The financial institutions will contact you.

At the same time, former students should be on guard against scammers who claim to be representing one of the parties and demand some kind of “fee.” No payment of any kind is required to receive compensation.

Nearly one million college students who received financial aid payments through Higher One, an institution-affiliated party of WEX Bank, were victims of de...

Article Image

Feds tout benefits of CARD Act

It's nice to know that every now and then a government action really does what it's supposed to do -- more or less. Case in point, the Credit Card Accountability Responsibility and Disclosure Act or CARD Act.

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) has released a report that says the Act has helped reduce the cost of “gotcha” credit card fees by more than $16 billion. In fact since the reform law, total costs to consumers have fallen with the elimination of certain back-end pricing practices such as over-limit fees.

In addition, the CFPB says credit has generally become more available to consumers and the number of new accounts has grown faster than in almost every other major consumer credit market.

However, concerns remain about other back-end practices such as deferred-interest promotions that can hit consumers with unexpected costs.

“The CARD Act has helped people avoid more than $16 billion in gotcha credit card fees,” said CFPB Director Richard Cordray. “The law made it easier for consumers to evaluate costs and risks by eliminating the worst back-end pricing practices in the market. There is more work to do. But with commonsense rules in place, credit cards are safer and more affordable, credit is more available, and companies remain profitable with improved customer satisfaction.”

Big business

More than 60% of adults own at least one credit card account. In the first six months of 2015, more than 14.5 billion credit card transactions accounted for more than $1.4 trillion in purchase volume.

Before the CARD Act, widespread back-end pricing practices racked up costs for consumers through hidden fees and other gotchas. The intent of the CARD Act was to create a fairer and more transparent market by protecting consumers against unexpected interest rate hikes, excessive late fees, and hard-to-avoid over-limit fees.

The report finds that, generally, consumers are paying less for their credit cards than they did before the law, and those costs are easier to predict before they are incurred. In addition, credit availability has continued to expand for consumers. Specifically, the report found that since the CARD Act:

  • Consumers have avoided more than $9 billion in over-limit fees
  • Consumers have saved more than $7 billion in late fees
  • Total cost of credit is roughly 2% lower than before the CARD Act
  • Available credit has increased 10% since 2012
  • More than 100 million credit card accounts offer consumers free access to their credit scores

Continued concerns

While the CARD Act addressed many problematic practices in the market, the CFPB has outstanding areas of concern from the report, including:

  • Deferred-interest promotions that can hit consumers with back-end pricing
  • Subprime credit card companies charging much more for credit
  • Rewards programs containing obscure and incomplete terms and conditions
  • Debt collection practices that pose risks to consumers
  • Agreements that are still long and complex

It's nice to know that every now and then a government action really does what it's supposed to do -- more or less. Case in point, the Credit Card Accounta...

Article Image

Chase will pay $50 million to consumers for debt collection abuses

JPMorgan Chase will pay $100 million to settle allegations that it committed debt-collection abuses against tens of thousands of its credit card holders, California Attorney General Kamala D. Harris announced today.

The settlement specifically addresses debt collection wrongdoing that includes collecting incorrect amounts, selling bad credit card debt, and running a debt collection mill that involved illegally “robo-signing” thousands of court documents and improperly obtaining default judgments against military servicemembers.

As part of the settlement, Chase will pay $50 million in restitution to consumers nationwide, including an estimated $10 million to California consumers, and significant restitution to servicemembers in California, some of whom were on active duty when Chase obtained illegal default judgments against them. 

Chase will also pay $50 million in penalties and other payments to California, through the Office of the Attorney General. The judgment includes injunctive terms that fundamentally change Chase’s credit card debt-collection practices to prevent similar misconduct in the future, and is subject to court approval.

“Abusive and illegal debt collection practices will not be tolerated in California,” Harris said. “This settlement provides real relief to tens of thousands of Californians, including servicemembers, and prevents JPMorgan Chase from continuing  these deceptive and illegal debt collection practices.”

Robosigners

Between 2009 and 2013, Chase filed more than 125,000 credit card collection lawsuits against California consumers relying on illegally robo-signed sworn documents and provided an additional 30,000 robo-signed sworn statements in support of lawsuits filed against California consumers by third-party debt-collectors, Harris said. 

Chase also made systematic calculation errors regarding the amounts owed, and sold “zombie debts” to third-party debt-collectors that included accounts that were inaccurate, settled, discharged in bankruptcy, not owed, or otherwise not collectable, she said.

The Attorney General’s investigation and litigation further revealed that Chase sent letters to consumers that contained illegal threats and were signed by attorneys who did not review the accuracy of the information, determine if litigation was appropriate, or intend to follow through on some of the threats made.

Chase also filed false declarations regarding military service and improperly obtained default judgments against servicemembers on active duty, in violation of the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act and the California Military and Veterans Code.

JPMorgan Chase will pay $100 million to settle allegations that it committed debt-collection abuses against tens of thousands of its credit card holders, C...

Article Image

Small businesses “overwhelmed” by new chip cards

Just weeks after new rules went into effect for the use of credit cards with embedded security chips, the National Retail Federation (NRF) complains small businesses are being pressured to make an expensive investment without receiving the full level of security that could be provided.

NRF arranged for a small business owner to testify before Congress this week. Keith Lipert, owner of The Keith Lipert Gallery, a single-location, three-employee store in Washington, told lawmakers small businesses are being overwhelmed.

“Overwhelmed”

“The EMV transition is overwhelming and expensive for an independent, small retailer,” Lipert said. “Small retailers are entirely at the mercy and whims of the big players. We have no say and no way to use the marketplace to make our objections heard and our concerns valued.”

Retailers say the EMV cards, which have an embedded computer chip, don't go far enough to promote security. NRF wants the system to an include a PIN, which would make it less likely a lost or stolen card could be used.

Consumers may have noticed that many retail locations, especially small businesses, are still using the old “swipe” card readers, not the new “dipping” readers.

Unresponsive banks


“EMV is all new to me, and banks and the networks are not contacting small businesses to help the transition in any way,” Lipert said. “No one from my bank, processor or existing supplier even contacted me about the need to add a new EMV device, let alone a deadline by which to do so.”

The House Small Business Committee is investigating how Europay MasterCard Visa cards will affect small businesses. The hearing followed this month’s deadline set by the card industry for merchants to install chip-card readers be on the hook for fraudulent card usage.

Seven times more secure

Lipert said the EMV cards being issued by banks are chip-and-signature cards, instead of the chip-and-PIN cards used in nearly all other countries where EMV cards are used. He pointed to Federal Reserve data showing that a secure, secret PIN to approve transactions is seven times more secure than an easily forged and often-illegible signature.

Lipert also said small businesses are seeing “significant delays” in obtaining chip card readers or getting them certified once they are installed. He says small businesses just aren't a priority for hardware manufacturers.

Chip card terminal can cost as much as $2,000 when installation, software and other expenses are included.

Just weeks after new rules went into effect for the use of credit cards with embedded security chips, the National Retail Federation (NRF) complains small ...

Article Image

FBI weighs in on safety of new chip card

The FBI has joined the discussion of the new EMV, or chip cards that are replacing credit and debit cards in the U.S.

“While EMV cards offer enhanced security, the FBI is warning law enforcement, merchants, and the general public that these cards can still be targeted by fraudsters,” the Bureau said in a public service announcement.

The EMV cards replace the traditional magnetic strip on the back with a small chip that holds encrypted data. It allows merchants to verify a card’s authenticity, providing the cardholder greater security and making the EMV card less vulnerable to hacking while the data is transmitted from the point of sale (PoS) to the issuing bank.

But the FBI says that may not be enough. It says EMV cards can be counterfeited using stolen card data obtained from the black market.

Prefers a PIN system

The FBI says the best defense is for consumers to use a PIN instead of a signature when making purchases.

“Merchants are encouraged to require consumers to enter their PIN for each transaction, in order to verify their identity,” the FBI said. “If a consumer uses a signature, merchants should ask to also see a government-issued photo identification card to verify the cardholder’s identity.”

This was music to retailers' ears, since they delivered an almost identical warning to Congress this week.

“What the FBI is saying is what the rest of the world already sees as common sense,” Mallory Duncan, National Retail Federation vice-president said. “It’s the right thing to do, and we hope the banks are listening.”

Leaving the back door open

Not using all of the card's potential security features, says Duncan, is like locking the front door but leaving the back door wide open.

“Retailers have long-argued that PINs are essential to providing cardholders with the security that they deserve,” said Brian Dodge, executive vice president of the Retail Industry Leaders Association (RILA), another retail industry trade group. “The FBI’s alert should be a wake-up call to the banks and card networks that continue to stand in the way of making PIN authentication the standard in the U.S. just as it has been around the world for years.”

The retailers complain that virtually all of the chip cards being issued in the United States are chip-and-signature rather than chip-and-PIN, leaving consumers without the option to use a PIN. By contrast, EMV cards used in 80 countries around the world for 20 years or more are routinely chip-and-PIN.

“They’re encouraging consumers to use PIN and they’re encouraging merchants to request PIN – the only thing missing is to encourage the banks to issue PIN cards,” Duncan said.

The FBI has joined the discussion of the new EMV, or chip cards that are replacing credit and debit cards in the U.S.“While EMV cards offer enhanced se...

Article Image

Best credit cards for travel in 2015

When oil prices started to dive about one year ago, no one thought they would go this low and stay this low for this long.

As a result, gasoline prices and competitive air fares have made travel more affordable than it's been in some time. To make it even more affordable, consumers who used a rewards credit card geared to travel can save even more.

According to personal finance website CardHub’s latest Credit Card Landscape Report, some cards offer consumers sign-up bonuses worth up to $625 and various other perks. The key to landing these perks, of course, is to have an above-average credit rating.

CardHub compared more than 1,000 credit card offers – and in the interest of full disclosure, some originate from CardHub advertising partners – in order to identify the best travel deals.

Best Initial Bonus

The survey found the value of initial rewards bonuses consumers can reap just by signing up appears to have stabilized near record highs during the third quarter. That said, bonuses offered in the form of points or miles have more than doubled in value over the last five years.

In the category of “Best Initial Bonus,” CardHub selected two cards; the Citi Thank You Premier Card and the Chase Sapphire Preferred Card.

The Citi card will award you 50,000 bonus points if you spend $3,000 during the first three months of card activation. You can then trade those points for a $625 statement credit that will go to pay travel-related charges that post to your account.

In addition, you rack up three points per $1 spent on travel and gas, two points per $1 on dining and entertainment, and one point per $1 on everything else. On the downside, there's a $95 annual fee, but it doesn’t kick in until the second year.

Putting at least $4,000 on a Chase Sapphire card during the first three months your account is open will result in a 40,000-point rewards bonus, which can be redeemed for $500 in travel accommodations booked through Chase's Ultimate Rewards Program or a $400 statement credit.

Best All Around

The Barclaycard Arrival Plus and Capital One Venture Rewards Card share honors for “Best All Around” travel cards.

The Barclaycard gives you a 40,000-mile rewards bonus, redeemable for $400 in travel expenses, but only if you spend $3,000 during the first three months the account is open. You’ll also earn the miles-equivalent of 2% cash back on all other purchases and receive a 5% rebate on miles redeemed for travel.

Spending $3,000 in the first three months will also get you 40,000 bonus points on the Capital One card. These points can be used to receive a $400 statement credit to pay for any travel-related expenses. The ongoing reward rate is two miles per $1 spent, with no limits or expiration dates.

This card also charges a $59 annual fee, but it is not assessed during the first year.

Other categories include “Airline Rewards,” “Hotel Rewards,” and “Road Trip Rewards.” After selecting the right credit card, the authors say the next step is to use it. In addition to the rewards, Credit cards offer $0 fraud liability guarantees, the lowest possible currency conversion rates, and complementary rental car insurance coverage.  

When oil prices started to dive about one year ago, no one thought they would go this low and stay this low for this long.As a result, gasoline prices...

Article Image

Small businesses not yet ready for new secure card payment system

October 1 is an important date for businesses that accept credit cards. That's when a new rule takes effect, shifting the liability for fraudulent credit card purchases from the banks to the business making the sale, if it has not installed EMV chip card technology.

Unfortunately, a survey by Wells Fargo shows small businesses, by and large, are not only unprepared – they aren't aware of what's coming.

In its quarterly Small Business Index Survey, just 49% of small business owners who accept point-of-sale card payments today report being aware of the impending liability shift, when a card issuer or merchant that does not support EMV chip card technology will assume liability for any fraudulent point-of-sale card transactions.

Financial institutions have been sending their customers new EMV chip-enabled credit and debit cards. These cards are designed to protect against fraudulent transactions by encoding cardholder information within an encrypted microchip and data that changes with each transaction.

For the cards to work, merchants must convert to new card readers or add EMV capability to their existing magnetic stripe card reader payment terminals. That costs money.

Only 31% compliance

With only three months remaining before the deadline, Wells Fargo and Gallup, which conducted the survey, found that only 31% of small business owners said that their existing credit card processing system accepts chip-enabled cards.

When asked if they plan to upgrade their point-of-sale credit card terminals to accept EMV chip cards, just 29% said they would before the Oct. 1 deadline. Another 34% said they will at some point in the future after October. Twenty-one percent said they never plan to upgrade.

"While our industry has made great progress in the last year informing and preparing small business owners for the EMV liability shift, the survey findings show us that we have more work to do," said Debra Rossi, head of Wells Fargo Merchant Services.

The bank said it is trying to build awareness, prepare small businesses for the EMV liability shift, and encourage business owners to adopt EMV chip-card technology. It has been providing EMV-capable equipment to customers since 2012.

It said all new and re-issued Wells Fargo Business Credit Cards and Business Elite Cards provided to customers are chip-enabled.

Card issuers take the lead

In fact, card issuers have been well ahead of businesses in adopting the EMV technology. Visa and Mastercard announced last year that they had formed a “new cross-industry group focused on enhancing payment system security” to spearhead adoption of the new technology, which has been in use in Europe for years.

Despite the split between businesses that intend to upgrade their payment terminals to accept EMV chip cards and those that don’t, small business owners seem to agree on one thing: when consumers buy something, they told the Wells Fargo survey takers, they prefer customers pay with cash or a check.

October 1 is an important date for businesses that accept credit cards. That's when a new rule takes effect, shifting the liability for fraudulent credit c...

Article Image

Citibank fined $700 million for illegal credit card practices

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) says Citibank, N.A. bilked roughly 7 million customers through deceptive marketing and billing for debt protection and credit monitoring services.

It has ordered the bank to pay $700 million in relief to consumers and $35 million in penalties.

A Citibank subsidiary also deceptively charged expedited payment fees to nearly 1.8 million consumer accounts during collection calls, the CFPB said. 

“We continue to uncover illegal credit card add-on practices that are costing unknowing consumers millions of dollars,” said CFPB Director Richard Cordray. “In our four years, this is the tenth action we’ve taken against companies in this space for deceiving consumers. We will remain on the lookout for similar conduct and will address it as we find it.”

According to the CFPB, Citibank actively marketed and enrolled consumers in five debt protection add-on products: “AccountCare,” “Balance Protector,” “Credit Protection,” “Credit Protector,” and “Payment Safeguard.”

These products promised to cancel a consumer’s payment or balance, or defer the payment due date, if the consumer experienced certain hardships, such as job loss, disability, hospitalization, and certain life events, such as marriage or divorce.

Citibank also marketed and sold other add-on products – “IdentityMonitor,” “DirectAlert,” “PrivacyGuard,” and “Citi Credit Monitoring Services” – that offered credit-monitoring or credit-report-retrieval services. Citibank also offered “Watch-Guard Preferred,” a wallet-protection service that notified credit and debit card issuers if the consumers reported a card lost or stolen.

Deceptive marketing

The service were marketed through a variety of deceptive methods, including telemarketing calls, online enrollment, “point-of-sale” application and enrollment at retailers, or when enrolled consumers later called tocancel certain products, the CFPB said. 

For example, confusing text on pin-pad offer screens at the point of sale increased the likelihood that consumers applying for credit cards at a retailer would not realize they were both applying for credit and purchasing debt-protection coverage.

The full text of the CFPB’s consent order is available online. 

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) says Citibank, N.A. bilked roughly 7 million customers through deceptive marketing and billing for debt pro...

Article Image

European Union accuses MasterCard of gouging tourists

The European Union's quibbles with Google are well-known and now it's taking on another symbol of American domination -- MasterCard. EU regulators say the credit card giant overcharges travelers for their purchases.

The EU for two years has been conducting an antitrust investigation into whether MasterCard stifles competition by charging "arrtificially high" interbank fees that stifle competition (and tourism) by driving up the total cost of purchases made by tourists.

The fees are not paid directly by tourists but are passed on to retailers, who in turn build them into the prices paid by consumers, even those who pay with cash.

"We currently suspect MasterCard is artificially raising the costs of card payments, which would harm consumers and retailers in the EU," said competition commissioner Margrethe Vestager, according to Courthouse News Service. "We have concerns both in relation to the rules MasterCard applies to cross-border transactions within the EU, as well as the fees charged to retailers for receiving payments made with cards issued outside Europe. MasterCard now has an opportunity to respond to our charges."

MasterCard said it is "working with the European Commission on the issue" and promised to release a formal response soon.

The European Union's quibbles with Google are well-known and now it's taking on another symbol of American domination -- MasterCard. EU regulators say the...

Article Image

Chase slapped for selling zombie debt, illegally robo-signing court documents

JPMorgan Chase faces more than $200 million in penalties and refund payments for selling "zombie debts" and illegally robo-signing court documents as a result of enforcement actions by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency and 47 states.

Chase allegedly sold bogus debts to third-party debt buyers -- accounts that were inaccurate, settled, discharged in bankruptcy, not owed, or otherwise not collectible. Many of the debt buyers then began hounding consumers in an attempt to collect the non-existent debts.

“Chase sold bad credit card debt and robo-signed documents in violation of law,” said CFPB Director Richard Cordray. “Today we are ordering Chase to permanently halt collections on more than 528,000 accounts and overhaul its debt-sales practices. We will continue to be vigilant in taking action against deceptive debt sales and collections practices that exploit consumers.”

The order requires Chase to document and confirm debts before selling them to debt buyers or filing collections lawsuits. Chase must also prohibit debt buyers from reselling debt and is barred from selling certain debts. Chase is ordered to permanently stop all attempts to collect, enforce in court, or sell more than 528,000 consumers’ accounts.

Chase will pay at least $50 million in consumer refunds, $136 million in penalties and payments to the CFPB and states, and a $30 million penalty to the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) in a related action.

The CFPB found that Chase violated the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act’s prohibitions against unfair, deceptive, or abusive acts and practices. Chase sold faulty and false debts to third-party collectors, including accounts with unlawfully obtained judgments, inaccurate balances, and paid-off balances.

Chase also sold debts that were owed by deceased borrowers. Chase also filed misleading debt-collections lawsuits against consumers using robo-signed and illegally sworn statements to obtain false or inaccurate judgments for unverified debts.

JPMorgan Chase faces more than $200 million in penalties and refund payments for selling "zombie debts" and illegally robo-signing court documents as a res...

Article Image

Feds take action against sellers of non-existent credit or identity theft monitoring services

Today the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, or CFPB, announced an action against two “credit card add-on product vendors” — sellers of services such as identity theft protection or credit monitoring — for billing customers for add-on services they never actually received.

The two companies – Intersections, Inc. and Affinion Group Holdings, Inc. (plus various Affinion affiliates) – must pay almost $9.6 million combined in consumer refunds and penalties. The CFPB said that under the proposed consent orders, Affinion would pay $6.8 million to cover refunds for eligible consumers plus an additional $1.9 million in civil penalties, and Intersections would pay $55,000 for refunds and $1.2 million in penalties.

Filed fees without providing service

According to the CFPB, Affinion, whose affiliated companies include Trilegiant Corporation; Watchguard Registration Services Inc.; Global Protection Solutions, LLC.; and three Affinion variants (Affinion Group, Inc.; Affinion Group, LLC.; and Affinion Benefits Group, LLC.), “advertised, sold, and delivered identity theft and credit monitoring products to consumers by establishing marketing and service agreements with banks.”

Specifically, according to the CFPB complaint, from July 2010 through August 2012 Affinion enrolled customers in programs promising benefits including credit monitoring and/or credit report retrieval, and charged customers between $6.95 to $15.99 per month, usually billed directly to their credit cards or withdrawn directly from their bank accounts.

Yet the CFPB alleges that “Affinion or its partner banks billed full product fees to at least 73,000 accounts while failing to provide the full credit monitoring or credit report retrieval services promised, and failed to refund fees to those consumers. During customer retention calls, the CFPB also alleges that Affinion frequently misled consumers about product benefits through inaccurate or incomplete retention phone call scripts, and statements and omissions by individual retention specialists.”

Billed and misled consumers

The results hurt consumers in two ways: CFPB says they were “billed for product benefits they did not receive,” and also “misled about product benefits and value to avoid cancellation.”

The CFPB made similar allegations against Intersections, which allegedly sold similar add-on services from 2009 through early 2013, charging between $8 and $13 per month. However, most former Intersections customers have already received refunds “in part as a result of prior Bureau enforcement actions,” but the Bureau estimates that “approximately $55,000 in consumer harm is still owed.”

Full copies of the CFPB's complaints against Affinion and Intersections are available as .pdfs here and here.

Today the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, or CFPB, announced an action against two “credit card add-on product vendors” — sellers of services such as...

Article Image

Customer-card security breach at Fred's Super Dollar

Southern and Midwestern shoppers beware: it looks like Fred's Super Dollar, a discount pharmacy and general merchandise retailer, is the latest business to lose customer payment-card data after hackers planted malware on the point-of-sale (POS) systems used in checkout lanes at Fred's locations.

Security expert Brian Krebs reports that he contacted the company last week, after “about a pattern of fraud on customer cards indicating that Fred’s was the latest victim” of malware planted on POS systems.

Fred's Inc. responded in a formal statement on Friday, admitting that:

Fred’s Inc. recently became aware of a potential data security incident and immediately launched an internal investigation to determine the scope of the issue. We retained Mandiant, a leading independent forensics firm, to examine our data security systems.

We want to assure our customers that protecting their information is one of our top priorities and we are taking this potential incident very seriously. Until this investigation is completed, it will be difficult to determine with certainty the scope or nature of any potential incident, but we will continue to work vigilantly to address any potential issues that may affect our customers.

Scope unknown

So far, that's the only information available: Fred's had a security breach, and hired investigators to look into it. The scope of the breach has not yet been determined: how long ago did the hackers plant the malware? How long were the hackers then able to monitor any transactions on those infected POS systems? And how many Fred's locations were affected?

Krebs' sources are “unclear” on that last bit, but said “the pattern of fraudulent charges traced back to Fred’s stores across the company’s footprint in the Midwest and south, including Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Indiana, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Tennessee and Texas.”

So if you are or have been a Fred's shopper in any of those states, and paid with a card rather than in cash, check your card statement extra-closely to see if you can spot any fraudulent charges.

Southern and Midwestern shoppers beware: it looks like Fred's Super Dollar, a discount pharmacy and general merchandise retailer, is the latest business to...

Article Image

ATM debit-card theft soars to highest levels in 20 years

Cracking down on data theft is kind of like squeezing a balloon: press down on a bulge in one area, and it'll only swell somewhere else.

So perhaps it's no surprise that today's Wall Street Journal reports the distressing statistic that, while brick-and-mortar merchants have been cracking down on data fraud at the checkout counter, criminals responded by attacking automatic teller machines, targeting not just bank-owned ATMs but the independently owned “cash kiosks” common in shopping malls, restaurants and other businesses.

(And that's not even counting the prevalence of hidden “skimmers” used to steal data from any ATM card swiped through them.)

Relatively easy

For a thief equipped with the right tools, it's relatively easy to steal debit card information and make counterfeit debit cards, which are then used to steal money from ATMs. The Journal said that according to FICO, the credit-scoring and analytics firm, the period spanning from January to April 9, 2015 saw more debit-card ATM attacks than any previous period in the past 20 years:

Debit-card compromises at ATMs located on bank property jumped 174% from Jan. 1 to April 9, compared with the same period last year, while successful attacks at nonbank machines soared by 317%, according to FICO. … The company declined to disclose the total number of such incidents, citing contractual restrictions with its customers.

ATM fraud has been growing overseas, too. Just last week, we reported the discovery of a new form of ATM fraud plaguing banks in Britain: thieves armed with nothing more than an iPod and a piece of plastic can spy on would-be ATM customers, steal their passcode and arrange for the machine to “eat” their cards – which are then retrieved and used to drain money from the account while the victim contacts bank personnel about their apparently faulty ATM. However, that form of fraud involves stealing and using legitimate ATM cards, not making counterfeit cards as reported by FICO.

It's important to remember that from an individual cardholder's perspective, debit card fraud is much worse than credit card fraud, because debit cards withdraw money directly from your savings accounts, whereas credit card purchases essentially borrow money from the credit card company.

This means that even if your debit-card fraudulent-charge complaint is ultimately settled in your favor, with the bank ultimately making full restitution to you – you still have to go without your money while the matter is being resolved.

If you do have a debit card, even if you're convinced that your account numbers are safe from thieves, you still need to check your account activity on a regular basis, whether you've used the card recently or not, so that if fraudulent withdrawals do occur, you can report them to your bank as soon as possible.

Cracking down on data theft is kind of like squeezing a balloon: press down on a bulge in one area, and it'll only swell somewhere else.So perhaps it's...

Article Image

Newest ATM security threat: one iPod plus a little plastic equals a big problem for banks

British police have uncovered the latest security threat to ATM cardholders, a threat so simple from a thief's perspective that it's pretty much guaranteed to come to America — if it hasn't already.

Security-savvy ATM users have known for years now to watch out for illegal “skimmers” — electronic devices placed over a legitimate ATM-card reader to steal personal identification numbers (PINs) and other information from any swiped cards.

Many of these skimmers are small and thin enough to escape a typical ATM user's notice (unless that sharp-eyed user knows exactly what to look for) — but a thief hoping to use a skimmer generally needs either technological ability sufficient to build his own, or criminal “connections” sufficient to buy one.

No barriers

However, as Security Affairs reported yesterday, the latest criminal threat to ATM security has no such barriers to entry. An off-the-shelf iPod hidden behind a panel with a pinhole drilled in it is all it takes to make a pinhole spy camera capable of recording the PINs of anyone who visits that particular ATM.

Though there's a little more to the scam than that. Apple's iPods have been on the market for years, but only last January was the first such incident of this particular iPod-based ATM spy camera scheme discovered in Gatley, Stockport (a suburb of Manchester, England). As the oft-sensationalist Daily Mail reported last January:

These pictures show the lengths criminal gangs are going to in an attempt to steal card details at ATM machines - as a trick of using hidden iPods as spy cameras continues to spread.

It involves strapping the musical device to the roof of a cash point and setting it to record video of a person inputting their personal identification number (PIN).

The iPod is concealed in a specially-designed fascia with the camera recording through a pinhole-sized gap.

A fascia is simply a long, thin board covering the area where a wall joins a roof or ceiling — the architectural equivalent of a beveled edge, more or less.

Card-eater

So long as the thief has a few minutes of privacy, it's very easy to attach an iPod to the roof or upper wall of an ATM cash point, hidden behind a fascia of the same color. After installing this hidden camera, the fraudsters then slip a thin piece of plastic into the actual ATM card slot.

Now they're ready to pull their scam, which works like this: a victim walks to the ATM, inserts his card and types his PIN, unaware of the hidden camera recording this information. Meanwhile, that piece of plastic in the card slot traps the card inside the ATM. So the victim can't get his card out of the machine, and eventually leaves – most likely to contact the bank and complain about a faulty card-eating ATM.

Once the victim leaves, the thieves go to the ATM, retrieve the card from the slot and the PIN from the video recording, and use these to withdraw cash from the victim's account.

When British police discovered such a setup at a Barclays ATM, they immediately removed the device and informed Barclays, which in turn urged its customers to keep a sharp eye on their accounts and immediately contact the bank if they notice any signs of fraudulent activity.

And if you're an American ATM user, regardless of who you bank with, you need to do the same thing.

British police have uncovered the latest security threat to ATM cardholders, a threat so simple from a thief's perspective that it's pretty much guaranteed...

Article Image

Understanding credit reports is key to building wealth

Access to credit allows you expand the power of your money. Having $25,000 in cash won't pay for much of a house but it might allow you to borrow enough to pay for a very nice home. As long as you appear to a lender to be a good risk.

Credit often gets a bad rap because it is easily misused. When people take on more debt than they can repay, they end up in a downward financial spiral that can end in bankruptcy.

That's why it is important to know what is contained in your credit report, maintained by the three credit reporting agencies Trans Union, Experian and Equifax, and the three-digit number that makes up your credit score.

Don't know

A survey by Chase Slate has found that 39% of U.S. consumers admit to not knowing their credit score and 52% were not aware that not paying bills on time has the largest impact on their credit score.

“Having healthy credit could mean the difference between achieving major life goals, such as buying a home or starting a small business, and never realizing those dreams,” said Pam Codispoti, President of the Mass Affluent Business for Chase Card Services. “Yet too many Americans don’t have access to information and tools that empower them to properly plan for the future and manage their credit health.”

Under federal law, every consumer can get free access to their credit reports once a year. You can access these reports by going to a single website – www.annualcreditreport.com. You can download the credit reports from Experian, Equifax and Trans Union all at once or one at a time throughout the year.

The reports will show what credit accounts are open in your name and whether these accounts are current. In addition to making you aware of your financial health, these reports will show if someone has stolen your identity and opened accounts in your name.

FICO credit scores aren't free

While access to your credit report is free, access to your credit score is not. The website CreditKarma.com advertises that it will provide a credit score at no charge, which is true. But the score is a proprietary one generated from data in your credit report. Your actual FICO score costs money.

Still, you can keep up with your FICO credit score by paying for it or by receiving a copy from your lender whenever you finance an automobile or home purchase. It's a number worth knowing.

“Your credit score is much more than just a number – it’s a key indicator of credit health that helps you assess where you stand and what’s within reach,” said personal finance expert and Chase Slate financial education partner Farnoosh Torabi. “Checking your score, and checking it regularly, is a simple step you can take now to introduce more positive financial habits into your life. The higher your score, the more likely you are to be deemed eligible for a loan or receive better terms and interest rates.”

For the record, credit scores run from 300 to 850, with the higher the number, the better your credit. A good credit score is generally considered to be 720 and higher. Once your score falls below 660, you are headed into poor to bad credit territory, significantly limiting what you can borrow and how much you'll pay for it.

Raising your credit score

Need to raise your credit score? Here's the best way to do it.

First, pay all your bills on time. If your cell phone provider reports your payment as delinquent, that's going to drag down your credit score.

Next, focus on paying down your credit card balances. The gap between your credit limit and the amount you owe should be as wide as possible. If you have an account with a $5,000 credit limit and a $4,400 balance, that doesn't look good.

Refrain from opening new credit accounts unless it is absolutely necessary. When checking out and the cashier asks if you'd like to open a store credit card to get $10 off your purchase, it's best to decline. Not worth it.

Some consumers with credit score issues they're unable to resolve themselves may benefit from legal representation. To learn more, visit our credit repair companies guide.

Finally, bite the bullet and pay down your debt instead of moving it to another credit card. There are times when moving a balance from a high interest credit card to one offering 0% interest might make sense, but it can also ding your credit score.

Access to credit allows you expand the power of your money. Having $25,000 in cash won't pay for much of a house but it might allow you to borrow enoug...

Article Image

What you should know about home equity loans

During the housing bubble millions of people borrowed against the equity in their homes and lived to regret it.

But home equity loans and home equity lines of credit (HELOC) remain legitimate and useful sources of credit as long as they are used properly. Since these loans are essentially second mortgages on your home, you should use great care in selecting and managing one of these loan products.

That starts with reading the credit agreement carefully and examining the terms and conditions of various plans, including the annual percentage rate (APR) and closing costs. It's not enough to just look at the interest rate.

Fixed rate or variable?

When comparing loan products, you'll find that different loans have different rate structures. Some have a fixed interest rate and some rates float, based on some benchmark like the prime rate.

The interest on variable rate loans has remained low over the last 6 years but that doesn't mean it will stay that way, especially if the Federal Reserve (Fed) begins raising rates later this year, as many market analysts expect.

According to the Fed, variable-rate plans secured by a home must, by law, have a cap on how much your interest rate may increase over the life of the plan. Some variable-rate plans limit how much your payment may increase and how low your interest rate may fall if the index drops.

Home equity loan

A home equity loan is similar to a mortgage in that you borrow a lump sum of money and begin paying it back over a fixed period of time – usually 15 years – at a fixed interest rate. It's a second monthly payment, on top of your principal mortgage payment.

A home equity loan is best used for a specific purpose, ideally to improve the value of the property. You might use the money, for example, to build an addition to your home.

Line of credit

A HELOC is a much more flexible loan and, because of that, requires a lot of self-discipline in how it is used. If a lender offers a $50,000 HELOC, for example, you do not have to draw any of the money until you need it – and even then you don't have to draw all $50,000.

In that way, it is a lot like a credit card – which is where the danger comes in. If the money is used to pay restaurant bills and to take vacations, you can run up large balances just like a credit card – but with much more dire consequences. Credit cards are unsecured; home equity loans and HELOCS are secured by your house. 

HELOCs can be structured in different ways. Some lenders off a 25-year term, with the borrower able to draw on the line for the first 10 years, then pay it back over the next 15. Some lines have no payback period at all, with the entire balance due at the end of a 10-year term.

This is where it is easy to get into trouble. Consumers need to have a plan for paying down the HELOC whenever they draw on it.

Short-term tool

A HELOC is best used as a short-term financial tool. If, for example, you have $8,000 in high interest credit card debt you are struggling to pay down, paying it off with a HELOC then allows you to use those monthly payments to pay down your line.

Because the interest rate is much lower, the debt will be repaid much faster than if you kept paying on the credit card with double-digit interest. Best of all, the interest on a HELOC is generally tax deductible (always check with your tax advisor first). Credit card interest is not.

Despite their risks, home equity loans and HELOCs are usually a safer and more cost effective financial tool than many other sources of credit. Your local bank probably offers one of these products.

The amount you can borrow will depend on normal credit considerations, along with the amount of equity you have in your home. Online calculators like this one can help you arrive at the potential amount you can borrow.

During the housing bubble millions of people borrowed against the equity in their homes and lived to regret it....

Article Image

Costco picks Citi Visa to replace American Express

Costco members will be getting a new credit card next year. The wholesale superstore chain has chosen Citigroup to succeed American Express as its exclusive issuer of co-branded cards in the U.S.

Costco said last month that it would be ending its relationship with Amex after the companies were unable to reach agreement on a renewal. There had been speculation that Capital One would snag the account but Citi apparently offered a sweeter deal.

The new arrangement takes effect April 1, 2016, when a co-branded Citi Visa card will become Costco's exclusive card.

The deal is actually two deals -- one with Citi to issue co-branded cards and the other with Visa to provide the payment network. American Express operates both a credit card company and a payment network.

Citi will be buying the existing portfolio of co-branded cards, Costco said in a statement. 

"Once issued, Costco's co-brand Visa credit card would provide generous rewards to Costco members, serve as the Costco membership card, and would be accepted at Costco locations in the United States and Puerto Rico, as well as all merchants worldwide that accept Visa credit cards," Costco said.

"Costco will provide its members with additional information in the coming months regarding the anticipated transition from its existing co-brand credit card program," the company added.

Citi limits?

So does this mean Costco customers will be required to have a Citi-issued Visa card? Probably. Costco said the Citi Visa card would serve as customers' Costco membership card. It might, however, be possible to use a different Visa card to pay for purchases. The companies haven't yet made that clear.

Currently, customers can use any American Express card -- not just the Costo/Amex co-branded Visa card to shop at Costco, presenting their Costco membership card at check-out.   

Currently, customers can also use MasterCard and Visa debit cards at Costco.

Anyway you look at it, it's bad news for American Express, which has said that the Costco account amounts to about 20% of its business. Analysts said Citi would make about $100 million annually off the Costco account.

Amex has been struggling to hold onto market share, while also trying to find ways to encourage its cardholders to put more of their purchases on the card. Its large portfolio of affluent customers makes Amex the biggest U.S. credit card issuer in terms of dollar volume. 

In other words, American Express has fewer cardholders than its biggest competitors but the customers it does have tend to be big spenders.

Amex said last week it would sweeten the deal for its Premier Rewards Gold cardholders.

“We’re making one of our most popular cards even better. This latest investment for our Premier Rewards Gold Card Members is designed to deepen our relationship by providing more value in the areas they spend most -- from everyday spending on things like gas and groceries, to dining and larger travel purchases,” said Lisa Durocher, Senior Vice President, Consumer Charge Cards & Benefits at American Express.

Costco members will be getting a new credit card next year. The wholesale superstore chain has chosen Citigroup to succeed American Express as its exclusiv...

Article Image

Hackers may have stolen payment card info from White Lodging's Marriott hotels

Travelers beware: it looks like hackers managed once again to steal credit or debit card data from the hotel franchise firm White Lodging Services Corporation, specifically a handful of Marriott properties which White Lodging owns.

Security blogger Brian Krebs said that multiple financial institutions have noticed a pattern of fraudulent charges on cards which appear to share one trait in common: all had been used at a White Lodging-owned Marriott. (White Lodging, meanwhile, says it is investigating, but has found no sign of a new breach.)

If confirmed, this security breach would be the second one to be discovered at White Lodging properties in a little over a year. In January 2014, information came to light suggesting that hackers had managed to lift customer information from various White Lodging properties throughout most of 2013 – not just White Lodging-owned Marriotts, but certain hotels under the names Hilton, Sheraton and Westin, as well.

Now, 13 months later, Krebs' sources in financial institutions are once again seeing evidence of security breaches at many of the same White Lodging-owned hotel properties hit before:

Banking sources say the cards that were compromised in this most recent incident look like they were stolen from many of the same White Lodging locations implicated in the 2014 breach, including hotels in Austin, Texas, Bedford Park, Ill., Denver, Indianapolis, and Louisville, Kentucky.  Those same sources said the compromises appear once again to be tied to hacked cash registers at food and beverage establishments within the White Lodging run hotels. The legitimate hotel transactions that predated fraudulent card charges elsewhere range from mid-September 2014 to January 2015.

Contacted about the findings, Marriott spokesman Jeff Flaherty said all of the properties cited by the banks as source of card fraud are run by White Lodging.

So if you've stayed at a White Lodging-run Marriott hotel in the past few months – or if you merely had a drink in the hotel bar or dined in the hotel restaurant – keep an extra-sharp eye out for indications that the card you used for payment has been compromised.

​Travelers beware: it looks like hackers managed once again to steal credit or debit card data from the hotel franchise firm White Lodging Services Corpora...

Article Image

Texas company sued for sham credit card

When is a credit card not a credit card? According to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB), when it's offered by Union Workers Credit Services.

The agency is suing the  Texas-based company on charges it deceived consumers into paying fees to sign up for a sham credit card. According to the CFPB the company falsely advertises a general-use credit card that -- in actuality -- can only be used to buy products from the company.

Union Workers Credit Services also deceptively implies an affiliation with unions by -- among other things -- using pictures of nurses, firefighters, and other public servants in its advertising, the lawsuit says. The court action seeks compensation for victims, a civil penalty and an injunction against the company.

“The business model for Union Workers Credit Services is built on duping consumers into signing up for a sham credit card,” said CFPB Director Richard Cordray. “Hundreds of thousands of people, including a great many union members who were specially targeted, have been tricked into spending millions of dollars for a so-called credit card that can really only be used to buy the company’s own products. From the misleading photos of nurses and firemen on its website to its bogus credit card, Union Workers Credit Services is illegally deceiving consumers.”

History of deception alleged

The CFPB claims that the company, which has been in operation since roughly 2004, generates the vast majority of the its revenue from selling a buying-club membership card that it falsely advertises as a general-purpose credit card.

Most consumers never use the membership card but cannot recoup their membership fees -- $37 if they apply through the mail or $95 if they apply online. Union Workers Credit Services allegedly has collected membership fees from hundreds of thousands of consumers throughout the U.S., totaling millions of dollars.

According to the lawsuit, Union Workers Credit Services is:

  • Falsely advertising a general-use credit card: The complaint alleges that through direct-mail ads and on its website, the company advertises a credit card that it falsely implies is for general use. The company’s ads suggest to consumers they can receive a pre-approved “platinum card” with a credit limit of up to $10,000 and a 5% annual percentage rate. The offer says consumers do not have to worry if they “have been denied access to a Visa or MasterCard.” Later, many consumers realize what they really bought was a buying-club membership card to purchase only goods from the company itself, rather than from other retailers.
  • Falsely advertising an association with unions: The CFPB also claims that the company deceives consumers by falsely suggesting that it is affiliated with labor unions. The banner of its website has photos of police, firefighters, and medical workers. The online application form asks consumers to select their union membership from a drop-down list.
  • Misusing consumer credit reports: Federal law requires that when companies use consumer credit reports to target certain advertisements to consumers without their advance consent, they must advise those consumers of their right to opt out of receiving such advertising. The lawsuit alleges that Union Workers Credit Services failed to do this.

Thousands of consumers have filed complaints with law enforcement agencies and the Better Business Bureau about Union Workers Credit Services, which has also been sued by multiple government authorities, including the New York State Attorney General and the U.S. Postal Service.

In addition to seeking to stop the alleged unlawful practices of Union Workers Credit Services, CFPB has requested that the court impose penalties on the company for its conduct and require compensation be paid to consumers who have been harmed.  

When is a credit card not a credit card? According to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB), when it's offered by Union Workers Credit Services. ...

Article Image

Sprint faces huge fine for unauthorized charges

In October, AT&T Wireless was fined $105 million for billing customers hundreds of millions of dollars for bogus cellphone subscriptions to horoscopes, love tips and other detritus they had never ordered. It was the largest fine in the FCC's history.

Now it's Sprint's turn. The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) today sued Sprint charging it illegally billed wireless consumers tens of millions of dollars in unauthorized third-party charges.

“Today we are suing Sprint for allowing illegal charges to be crammed onto consumers’ wireless bills,” said CFPB Director Richard Cordray. “Consumers ended up paying tens of millions of dollars in unauthorized charges, even though many of them had no idea that third parties could even place charges on their bills. As the use of mobile payments grows, we will continue to hold wireless carriers accountable for illegal third-party billing.”

The Bureau’s complaint alleges that Sprint operated a billing system that allowed third parties to “cram” unauthorized charges on customers’ mobile-phone accounts and ignored complaints about the charges. The CFPB seeks refunds for affected consumers and penalties to deter unauthorized third-party charges in the future.

The practice of billing customers for third-party services they did not order is known as cramming, and it is one of the plagues of the deregulated telecommunications environment. The charges tend to be small -- usually about $10 a month -- and are often missed by consumers when they examine their bills each month.

The charges are for such generally useless services as horoscopes, ring tones, sports scores and other information and features that are widely available at no charge on the Internet. 

The CFPB said that Sprint outsourced payment processing for these digital purchases to vendors called “billing aggregators” without properly monitoring them.

The lack of oversight gave aggregators near unfettered access to consumers’ wireless accounts. Sprint’s system attracted and enabled unscrupulous merchants who, in some cases, only needed consumers’ phone numbers to cram illegitimate charges onto wireless bills. The charges ranged from one-time fees of about $0.99 – $4.99 to monthly subscriptions that cost about $9.99 a month. Sprint received a 30-40 percent cut of the gross revenue from these charges.

Most consumers were targeted online. Consumers clicked on ads that brought them to websites asking them to enter their cellphone numbers. Some merchants tricked consumers into providing their cellphone numbers to receive “free” digital content and then charged for it. Many others simply placed fabricated charges on bills without delivering any goods or communicating with consumers, the suit alleges.

Others charged

Besides AT&T, the FCC has also sued T-Mobile in a case that is still pending. Prosecutors have said they will argue that T-Mobile made hundreds of millions of dollars through similar cramming schemes.

Consumers rate Sprint PCS

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and other agencies have gone after the third-party operators who promote the schemes and process the bills. 

Today the FTC said that one of the defendants behind a massive landline cramming operation that placed more than $70 million in unauthorized charges on consumers’ phone bills has agreed to settle charges against him.

Nathan M. Sann, one of the defendants in the American eVoice, Ltd. case has agreed to settle the FTC’s charges related to his alleged participation in the scheme.

In its complaint, the FTC alleged that the operation placed charges ranging from $9.95 to $24.95 per month on consumers’ landline phone bills for voicemail services they never signed up for and never even knew they had.  The case against the other entities and individuals involved in the scheme is on-going.

The settlement contains a monetary judgment of more than $21 million, which represents the amount of consumer injury attributable to Sann during his involvement with the scam.  The judgment will be suspended due to Sann’s inability to pay upon his surrender of certain personal assets.  Under the terms of the settlement, if Sann has misrepresented his financial condition, the full judgment would become due.

In August, the FTC reached a settlement from Andrew Bachman, who with a number of other defendants pitched text message services offering “love tips,” “fun facts,” and celebrity gossip alerts, and placed charges for these services – typically $9.99 a month – on consumers’ wireless bills without their permission.

Bachman, who appears to be typical of the relatively small operators who have turned wireless telecommunications networks into treacherous territory, agreed to surrender more than $1.2 million in assets, including the contents of numerous bank accounts, two luxury cars, shares in a number of startup companies and multiple luxury watches.

Unlike Bachman and other small-time defendants who lose all of their personal assets in negotiated settlements, AT&T, Sprint and other telecom giants simply pay the fines and move on, their executives free of personal liability and virtually never threatened with jail terms for the misdeeds that occurred on their watch.  

In October, AT&T Wireless was fined $105 million for billing customers hundreds of millions of dollars for bogus cellphone subscriptions to horoscopes, lov...

Article Image

Payment systems breached at U.S. bebe stores

There's bad news for shoppers of bebe clothing stores. On Friday, the company confirmed what security blogger Brian Krebs had reportedthe day before: for most of the month of November, hackers managed to breach bebe stores' payment systems and steal customer data, possibly including their name (as it appears on the card), account number, the expiration date and verification code.

If you shopped with a payment card at a physical bebe store location in the U.S., Puerto Rico or the U.S. Virgin Islands between Nov. 8 and Nov. 26, 2014, your information might be compromised. However, the company said that its website and mobile payment apps, as well as its physical stores in Canada and other international locations, were not affected.

"Our relationship with our customers is of the highest importance," said Jim Wiggett, Chief Executive Officer, bebe. "We moved quickly to block this attack and have taken steps to further enhance our security measures."

As usually happens in such cases, bebe stores is offering customers a year of free credit monitoring protection even though, as Krebs pointed out, such services “do nothing to help consumers block fraud on existing accounts.”

Whether you have professional credit monitoring or not – and, for that matter, even if you've never shopped at a bebe store or any other retailer known to have been hacked, you need to carefully scrutinize your credit-card statements every month, to ensure that you recognize and authorized each and every one of them.

There's bad news for shoppers of bebe clothing stores. On Friday, the company confirmed what security blogger Brian Krebs had reported the day before: for ...

Article Image

New protections for prepaid credit cards proposed

New federal consumer protections for the prepaid credit card market, which include that an issuing company limit consumers’ losses when funds are stolen or cards are lost, are being proposed by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB).

In addition, the issuing companies would be required to investigate and resolve errors, provide easy and free access to account information, and adhere to credit card protections if a credit product is offered in connection with a prepaid account.

New “Know Before You Owe” prepaid disclosures that would provide consumers with clear information about the costs and risks of prepaid products upfront are also being proposed.

“Consumers are increasingly relying on prepaid products to make purchases and access funds, but they are not guaranteed the same protections or disclosures as traditional bank accounts,” said CFPB Director Richard Cordray. “Our proposal would close the loopholes in this market and ensure prepaid consumers are protected whether they are swiping a card, scanning their smartphone, or sending a payment.”

Prepaid products: What are they?

Prepaid products are consumer accounts typically loaded with funds by a consumer or by a third party, such as an employer. Consumers can use these products to make payments, store funds, get cash at ATMs, receive direct deposits, and send funds to other consumers.

Prepaid products are often bought at retail stores or online and are among the fastest growing types of consumer financial products in the United States. For example, the amount of money consumers loaded onto “general purpose reloadable” prepaid cards grew from less than $1 billion in 2003 to nearly $65 billion in 2012. The total dollar value loaded onto general purpose reloadable cards is expected to continue to grow to nearly $100 billion through 2014.

This proposal would apply a number of specific federal consumer protections to broad swaths of the prepaid market for the first time. The proposal would cover traditional plastic prepaid cards, many of which are general purpose reloadable cards. In addition, the proposal would cover mobile and other electronic prepaid accounts that can store funds.

The prepaid products covered by the proposal also include: payroll cards; certain federal, state, and local government benefit cards such as those used to distribute unemployment insurance, child support, and pension payments; student financial aid disbursement cards; tax refund cards; and peer-to-peer payment products.

Prepaid protections

Many consumers use prepaid products as an alternative to traditional checking accounts. Currently, however, there are limited federal consumer protections for most prepaid accounts. The proposal would ensure that most prepaid account consumers would have important protections under the Electronic Fund Transfer Act after registering their account.

The protections are generally similar to those checking account consumers already receive and include:

  • Easy and free access to account information: Under the CFPB proposal, financial institutions would be required to either provide periodic statements or make account information easily accessible online and for free. The proposal would ensure that consumers are able see their account balances and a history of their transactions and fees.
  • Error resolution rights: This proposal would require financial institutions to investigate errors that consumers report on registered accounts and to resolve those errors in a timely manner. If the financial institution cannot resolve an alleged error within a certain period of time, it would be required to temporarily credit the disputed amount to the consumer to use while the institution finishes its investigation.
  • Fraud and lost-card protection: The proposal would protect consumers against unauthorized, erroneous, or fraudulent withdrawals or purchases, including when registered cards are lost or stolen. If consumers lose their prepaid card or find erroneous or fraudulent charges on their prepaid account, the rule would limit their responsibility for transactions they did not authorize and create a timely method for them to get their money back. As long as the consumer promptly notifies his financial institution, the consumer’s responsibility for unauthorized charges would be limited to $50.

Know before you owe: prepaid fees

The proposal also includes new “Know Before You Owe” prepaid disclosures that would provide consumers with standard, easy-to-understand information about the prepaid account. Under the proposal, prepaid consumers would have access to:

  • Standard, easy-to-understand information upfront: The CFPB’s proposal includes two required forms, one short and one long, with easy-to-understand disclosures.
  • Publicly available card agreements: To facilitate comparison shopping, this proposal would require that prepaid account issuers post their account agreements on their websites. Additionally, issuers would be required to submit those agreements to the Bureau for posting on a public, Bureau-maintained website.

Credit protections

The proposal also includes strong protections in connection with credit products that allow consumers to pay to spend more money than they have deposited into the prepaid account. Under the proposed rule, if consumers choose to use a credit product related to their prepaid account, they would be entitled to the same protections that credit card consumers receive today. The protections that would also apply to prepaid credit products include:

  • Ability to pay: Like credit card issuers, prepaid companies would be required to first make sure consumers have the ability to repay the debt before offering credit. For consumers under 21, the companies would be required to assess these consumers’ independent ability to repay the credit.
  • Monthly credit billing statement: Prepaid companies would be required to give consumers the same monthly periodic statement that credit card consumers receive. This statement would detail consumers’ fees, and if applicable, interest rate, what they have borrowed, how much they owe, and other key information about repaying the debt.
  • Reasonable time to pay and limits on late fees: Prepaid companies, like credit card issuers, would be required to give consumers at least 21 days to repay their debt before they are charged a late fee. Additionally, late fees must be “reasonable and proportional” to the violation of the account terms in question.
  • Limited fee and interest charges: During the first year a credit account is open, the total fees for prepaid credit products would not be allowed to exceed 25% of the credit limit. Card issuers generally are prohibited from increasing the interest rate on an existing balance unless the cardholder has missed two consecutive payments. Card issuers may increase the interest rate prospectively on new purchases, but must generally give the consumer 45 days advance notice -- during which time the consumer may cancel the credit account.

The CFPB’s proposal also includes some additional protections to ensure that the prepaid account and the credit product are distinct, such as:

  • Thirty-day waiting period: The CFPB’s proposal would require companies to wait thirty days after a consumer registers the prepaid account before they could formally offer credit to the consumer.
  • Wall between prepaid funds and credit repayment: Prepaid companies could not automatically demand and take credit repayment whenever a prepaid account is next loaded with funds. Further, prepaid companies could not take funds loaded into the prepaid account to repay the credit when the bill is due unless the consumer has affirmatively opted in to allow such a repayment. Even then, companies cannot take funds more frequently than once per calendar month. Payment also cannot be required sooner than 21 days after the mailing of the periodic statement.

New federal consumer protections for the prepaid credit card market, which include that an issuing company limit consumers’ losses when funds are stolen or...

Article Image

Falling behind in credit card payments can cost a bundle

There are many things you should not do with a credit card. Among them -- falling behind on payments.

Consider a cardholder who carries a $4,000 balance on a card charging 11.82%. That's the average rate for those carrying a balance, according to the Federal Reserve. At the 28.45% average penalty rate, the cardholder would have to pay an extra $665.20 in interest a year, according to CreditCards.com's survey of 100 U.S. credit cards. In 2012, it would have been worse. The average APR then was 28.60%.

Penalty rates are the often-stratospheric APRs that a bank charges a cardholder for making a major mistake, typically being 60 days or more late with a payment.

Staying current is a must

“This drives home, once again, just how incredibly important it is to pay your bills on time every time,” said Matt Schulz, CreditCards.com’s senior industry analyst. “Debt can grow quickly even with an average interest rate. But when you’re hit with a penalty rate, things can get out of control in a hurry.”

Fortunately for cardholders who carry a balance, the number of issuers using penalty interest rates has decreased dramatically since the passage of the 2009 Credit Card Accountability, Responsibility and Disclosure (CARD) Act. In 2010, 91% of issuers imposed penalty rates. By 2012, the number had fallen to 69%. This year, it was just 60%.

Among card issuers charging a penalty rate, the lowest -- 17.99% -- is assessed by Pentagon Federal Credit Union's Cash Rewards Visa Standard card. 

Survey highlights

  • Sixty of 100 surveyed cards have a penalty interest rate of some kind:28 have penalty APRs based on the prime rate plus a specified percent. Rates based on the prime rate can move up automatically when that index rises, as it is expected to in 2015; 32 calculate a cardholder's penalty APR based on creditworthiness.
  • Only 23 cards disclose penalty rate information in the card terms and conditions; 77 cards required follow-up phone calls or review of cardholder agreements to confirm penalty rate details.
  • The CARD Act required lenders to revoke the penalty rate if consumers make 6 consecutive on-time payments after the penalty rate is applied, but just 38 of the 60 cards make that clear in their publicly available documents.

There are many things you should not do with a credit card. Among them -- falling behind on payments. Consider a cardholder who carries a $4,000 balance o...

Article Image

Home Depot: Hackers stole 53 million email addresses in addition to credit card data

It keeps getting worse. Two months ago, Home Depot revealed that hackers had stolen 56 million credit- and debit-card numbers. And now, the company says the thieves also made off with at least 53 million customer email addresses. 

It's been over two months now since the initial discovery that hackers had somehow managed to lift massive amounts of confidential customer data from Home Depot. Though Home Depot only announced it in mid-September, the hackers had actually been lifting data for several months by then (although it turned out nobody actually “hacked” into Home Depot's database; instead, somebody somehow managed to plant malware onto the checkout systems in various Home Depot stores).

So far as anyone knows, that malware has since been scrubbed from all Home Depot systems, and the months-long hacking is finally “over” — yet the full extent of the damage probably still isn't known.

Not until late September did the financial consequences of the breach start making themselves felt, as banks and credit unions across the U.S. and Canada starting receiving large numbers of fraudulent charges related to the breach. As of late October, American credit unions report combined losses of at least $60 million to replace all compromised cards, cover fraudulent charges or withdrawals and pay additional staff to oversee the whole mess.

Another shoe drops

And now the next installment. Late last night, Home Depot disclosed new information about the months-old hack: in addition to raw credit- and debit-card numbers, the thieves managed to steal at least 53 million customer email addresses.

The hacking shares many details in common with earlier mass hackings, especially the notorious Target hack from 2013: same type of malware used in both cases, and also, in both cases, the hackers managed to breach the stores' security by attacking a third-party vendor – in Target's case, an HVAC repairman; for Home Depot, a still-unidentified third-party vendor whose user name and password were presumably stolen sometime in April, just before the hackers first used those credentials to log on to Home Depot's network and start stealing data.

Home Depot is still offering free identity-theft protection services for any customer who used a payment card in any store since early April.

If you are such a customer, you have hopefully taken advantage of this free service already; this can help protect your financial data, but unfortunately won't do much to keep hackers from sending spam to your stolen email address.

It's over two months now since the initial discovery that hackers had somehow managed to lift massive amounts of confidential customer data from Home Depot...

Article Image

Bad week for mobile wallets: Apple Pay loses retailers and CurrentC gets hacked

It's far too early to predict who if anyone will be the eventual winner of the mobile-payment wars, especially since Apple Pay and its upcoming rival CurrentC both faced major setbacks this week.

Less than seven days after it was first made available, Apple Pay encountered its first roadblock when the pharmacy chains CVS and Rite-Aid stopped accepting it. Although neither chain officially explained why, most observers agree it's because they decided instead to work with a retailer-owned group called the Merchant Customer Exchange (MCX) to develop a competing mobile-payments app called CurrentC, scheduled to be widely released next year.

Mobile payment systems are being touted as far more secure than traditional credit and debit cards, which did not stop CurrentC from getting hacked this week (though full release won't be until next year, the app is currently being tested in a limited pilot program).

On Wednesday, participants in CurrentC's pilot program received a warning from the MCX: at some point in the previous 36 hours, hackers had managed to grab the email addresses of all participants.

Granted: by hacking-damage standards, hackers gaining access to a mere list of email addresses (without even getting the passwords to control them) is very mild indeed, and there's no evidence to suggest the hackers managed to get any other information MCX keeps on its users, such as their name, home address, phone number and actual physical location (or at least their phone's physical location). At least not this time.

It's far too early to predict who if anyone will be the eventual winner of the mobile-payment wars, especially since Apple Pay and its upcoming rival Curre...

Article Image

Home Depot security breach cost credit unions at least $60 million

It's been less than two months since Home Depot first admitted (on Sept. 2) that it was “looking into some unusual activity” which everyone now knows was the largest retailer data theft to date, with at least 56 million debit and credit card numbers stolen. Home Depot formally admitted the breach on Sept. 18.

At the time, the Credit Union National Association (CUNA) urged its member credit unions to take part in a survey assessing the damages caused by the breach, including:

• Number of debit and credit cards affected;
• Costs incurred for card reissuance;
• Costs related to additional staffing, member notification, account monitoring, etc.;
• Changes in call volume;
• Changes in staffing; and
• Any specifically identifiable fraud-related losses.

By the end of September, two credit unions in Pennsylvania and New York had already filed federal lawsuits against Home Depot, seeking class action status on behalf of all financial institutions similarly affected by the breach.

And the financial fallout continues to be felt. Today CUNA released the results of its member survey and announced that Home Depot's security breach has cost U.S. credit unions nearly $60 million so far.

Still costs money

From the perspective of credit unions and other card issuers, one major problem with stolen credit card and similar account numbers is that even in a best-case scenario, where the theft is discovered and cards cancelled before the thief can make any fraudulent purchases with them, it still costs money just to issue new cards and set up new accounts. And of course, the Home Depot security breach was far from a best-case scenario for the credit unions and banks.

CUNA said that, according to a survey of member credit unions, 7.2 million of their debit and credit cards were affected, and had to be re-issued. The average cost per card was $8.02, which includes re-issuing the card itself, paying for fraudulent charges, and paying additional staff costs for account monitoring, member notification and similar costs.

CUNA economist Bill Hampel said that fraud accounted for 60% of the total cost, averaging $4.89 per card. But that means that even had this been a best-case security breach, with all 7.2 million of those cards cancelled before being put to any fraudulent use, it still would've cost roughly $3.13 to re-issue each card, and pay staff to notify members and monitor accounts to ensure no fraudulent activity; the best-case scenario still would've cost credit unions over $22.5 million.

Who pays?

How much of that cost is likely to be borne by Home Depot? Despite the pending lawsuits, chances are the credit unions and their members will be stuck with the bulk of it.

CUNA president and CEO Jim Nussle said “The cost to credit unions of data breaches — which seem to be occurring with increasing regularity — is rising, as the CUNA surveys clearly demonstrate …. The bottom line is that credit union members end up paying the costs — despite the fact that the credit unions they own had nothing to do with causing the breach in the first place.”

It's been less than two months since Home Depot first admitted (on Sept. 2) that it was “looking into some unusual activity” which everyone now knows was t...

Article Image

Do you know what payments impact your credit score?

You probably have heard that being late in paying your bills can whittle away at your credit score. But which bills have the most impact?

When credit bureau TransUnion conducted a survey of consumers asking that very question, it found a lot of confusion. The fact is that not all of your monthly payments are routinely reported to credit agencies. But some are.

Nearly half of consumers who rent their homes mistakenly believe rental payments are automatically reported to credit bureaus and therefore affect their credit scores.

"Most consumers report paying rent on-time, but many don't realize that until now these payments are not boosting their credit histories," said Ken Chaplin, senior vice president of TransUnion.

Rental payments are starting to count

But that appears to be changing. Chaplin says more property managers are starting to report payments to credit bureaus and renters should be consistently monitoring what is being registered on their individual report.

More than 50% of consumers in the survey mistakenly believe payments for cable and Internet fees, utility bills and cell phone bills are regularly reported to credit bureaus. They aren't, unless of course you fall so far behind that it gets turned over to collections.

Paying your mortgage on time is regularly reported to credit agencies but fewer than 29% of consumers knew that.

The trend of property managers reporting rental payments to credit agencies is one TransUnion says will benefit renters in the long run. That's because, to build up a credit rating you need credit.

If rent is counted as reportable credit, then renters have the same opportunity to build their credit score as homeowners who pay a mortgage.

"Expanding the share of property managers who report rental payments will produce more accurate information that truly reflects how consistently consumers meet their financial obligations," said Chaplin. "It will benefit renters who want to help their credit scores and landlords who want to attract renters who pay rent on-time."

Renters appear to welcome the monitoring. More than half of renters in the survey said they would be more likely to choose a property to rent if they knew their landlord would report their rental payments to credit bureaus.

Check your credit report

There are other ways consumers can improve their credit scores. It starts with checking your credit report once a year, using www.annualcreditreport.com. Your credit report contains the data used to calculate your score and it may contain errors. Additionally consumers can hire a credit repair company - these companies provide consumers legal services to address credit report issues.

It's important to check to make sure that there are no late payments incorrectly listed for any of your accounts and that the amounts owed for each of your open accounts is accurate. If you find errors on any of your reports, dispute them with the credit bureau and reporting agency.

Be on time

The best way to improve you credit score is to pay all your bills on time, whether they are reported to credit agencies or not. Take advantage of your bank's payment reminders. They can send you a reminder by text or email when a payment is due.

You could also consider enrolling in automatic payments through your credit card and loan providers to have payments automatically debited from your bank account. However, this tool usually makes only the minimum payment on your credit cards and does not help instill a sense of money management.

If you are having trouble paying bills contact your creditors or see a legitimate credit counselor.

This won't rebuild your credit score over night but if you can begin to manage your credit and pay on time, your score should increase over time. Seeking assistance from a credit counseling service will not hurt your FICO score.

You probably have heard that being late in paying your bills can whittle away at your credit score. But which bills have the most impact?...

Article Image

Fallout continues from Home Depot data breach

It's been almost six months now since hackers first managed to breach Home Depot security in April, and started stealing its customers' confidential financial data.

The breach itself wasn't first discovered by independent security bloggers until Sept. 2, and not until Sept. 18 did Home Depot formally announce that yes, hackers had breached its security, and made off with 56 million debit- and credit-card numbers.

Home Depot also said that hackers did not steal anybody's personal identification numbers (PINs), which appears to be true yet might not matter since earlier reports suggested that, while the hackers didn't actually get anybody's PINs, they did get enough other data to change people's PINs without their knowledge.

Yet for all the time this security breach has existed, it appears that only now is the full financial damage starting to make itself felt.

Fraudulent transactions

The Wall Street Journal first reported yesterday that fraudulent transactions traceable to the breach were starting to surface, “rippling across fiancial institutions and, in some cases, draining cash from customer bank accounts.”

The customers who actually had money withdrawn from their accounts (as opposed to seeing fraudulent charges appear on their credit cards) presumably had this happen because the hackers were able to change their PINs by gaming the Voice Response Unit (VRU) banks use to deal with PIN changes; if you're worried your own bank account might be at risk, you might want to double-check your bank's PIN security measures against this hacking technque which security blogger Brian Krebs explained on Sept. 8.

In other news, related to the Home Depot breach, two credit unions (New York's Southern Chautauqua Federal Credit Union and Pennsylvania's First Choice Federal Credit Union) filed suit against Home Depot in Atlanta federal court last week, over financial damages the credit unions sustained as a result of Home Depot's data breach. An attorney says that the breach has already cost the financial industry “hundreds of millions” of dollars in damages.

The two credit unions are trying to have their lawsuit granted class action status. In Canada, an Ottawa man who says hackers charged $8,000 to his credit card after the breach is also suing Home Depot, and seeking similar class-action status for affected Canadians.

It's been almost six months now since hackers first managed to breach Home Depot security in April, and started stealing its customers' confidential financ...

Article Image

Report: Home Depot knew about security problems as far back as 2008

Last week Home Depot officially confirmed what security experts had already suspected since Sept. 2: yes, hackers did indeed manage to steal confidential customer data from Home Depot shoppers: 56 million debit- and credit-card numbers in all, making it the largest such breach on record. Any payment card used at a Home Depot store between April and Sept. 2 of this year is potentially at risk.

The very next day, The New York Times reported that the company had repeatedly been warned of its weak, at-risk security practices as far back as 2008, yet did nothing about the news. Sources for the Times said that the company relied on outdated security software, even as some securty experts left the company after managers repeatedly dismissed their concerns.

Even when Home Depot finally started to listen and tried doing the right thing, it backfired badly: the Times also said that “in 2012, Home Depot hired a computer engineer to help oversee security at its 2,200 stores. But this year, as hacks struck other retailers, that engineer was sentenced to four years in prison for deliberately disabling computers at the company where he previously worked.”

Readers unsurprised

Consumers rate Home Depot
Our own readers were, for the most part, completely unsurprised by initial reports that Home Depot's data security might not be up to snuff: on Sept. 2, when we first reported the mere unconfirmed possibility of a Home Depot data breach, the people who commented on the story were downright blasé about the prospect.

“I can believe this,” comented S. Garcia posted, while another commenter, R. Watters, went into more detail:

This is nothing new. My bank account was debited over $1600 last year for two gift cards at two Home Depot stores in Texas. Apparently, someone got a hold of my debit card number at Home Depot. My bank credited my account, but Home Depot could not have cared less. One of the managers at the [redacted] store was even upset that someone gave me his name to contact. I no longer shop at Home Depot.

T. Hostetler pointed out another problem:

If you return an item to Home Depot that you charged on a credit card and you present a receipt, they will credit your credit card account for the return without you giving them your card again. Why in the hell are they allowed to store your credit card information on their computers? Just because you bought an item from them, should not give them the right to keep your credit card information as long as they see fit!

What to do

For what it's worth, Home Depot is offering free identity-theft protection services, including credit monitoring, to any customer who used a payment card during or after April 2014.

Interested customers should call 1-800-HOMEDEPOT (800-466-3337) in the United States, or 800-668-2266 in Canada.

Last week Home Depot officially confirmed what security experts had already suspected since Sept. 2: yes, hackers did indeed manage to steal confidential c...

Article Image

Best Buy, Walmart, other retailers won't accept Apple Pay

The problem with introducing any new form of currency or payment system is finding buyers and sellers willing to accept it.

This week, when Apple unveiled its new iPhone6 and iWatch, one of the new features it particularly highlighted was the mobile pay option: instead of paying for things with a credit card, you could use your mobile device instead.

Problem is, how many businesses are willing to accept Apple Pay? In addition to Apple itself, the list of merchants accepting this option includes CVS, Walgreens, McDonald's, Bloomingdale's, Macy's and Whole Foods, among others. And credit-card companies and other financial institutions are happy to work with Apple Pay, too. Now, how many other merchants will climb on board?

The Wall Street Journal reports that Walmart and Best Buy will not be accepting Apple Pay. Instead, those stores are working with “a retailer-owned mobile technology group called Merchant Customer Exchange, which also counts Target Corp. among its members.” Other stores working with MCE include 7-Eleven, Southwest Airlines, Shell and the Gap.

In 2015, Merchant Customer Exchange is expected to release its own mobile-phone payment option, in the form of a downloadable app called CurrentC. Unlike Apple Pay, it will be usable on any Android or iPhone, not just the newest Apple products. Nor will it require specialized checkout scanners, as Apple Pay does.

One thing seems certain: the era of widespread mobile payment options will soon be here. The only question is, which technology company will be the first to dominate the market? 

The problem with introducing any new form of currency or payment system is finding buyers and sellers willing to accept it....

Article Image

Credit-card industry promises better security in future cards

If you're a credit-card holder who's fed up with the regular weekly warnings to protect yourself if your information was on the database of the latest major retailer who got hacked, there might be good news on the horizon.

The Wall Street Journal reported yesterday that the “credit-card industry is accelerating efforts to keep sensitive customer information out of the hands of merchants, as a rash of data breaches at major U.S. retailers erodes confidence in electronic payment systems.”

Visa and MasterCard are both adopting a new technology called “tokenization” which, according to the Journal, “replaces cardholder information such as account numbers and expiration dates with a unique series of numbers that validates the customer's identity.”

With the current credit-card system, merchants store their customers' account numbers and related information on their own databases. With tokenization, however, a “merchant can conduct a normal transaction without seeing or storing the customer's account number, expiration date or other information contained on a card. The actual card data is stored by the card issuer or processor in a 'virtual vault.'”

Virtual vaults

Presumably, whoever runs those virtual vaults will still have to ensure nobody hacks into them and steals the valuable data therein. Still, from the perspective of (for example) the MasterCard company, making sure their one “virtual vault” is secure should be much easier than hoping every single merchant who accepts MasterCard keeps their customer information in a properly secured database.

Tokenization is not the only security improvement on the horizon. American credit card companies have already promised, at some future time, to switch from current magnetic-strip credit cards to cards with “EMV” chips.

EMV, which stands for "EuroPay, MasterCard and Visa," has been standard on European credit cards for over a decade already. The difference between magnetic-strip credit cards and EMV is that the latter stores information on an encrypted microchip, rather than on the non-encrypted (and relatively easy to counterfeit) magnetic strip found on most American credit cards.

EMV cards also require a personal identification number (PIN) at point of sale. The idea is that with EMV, a thief who knows your credit card account number can no longer make and use a fraudulent credit card with that alone.

On the other hand: while these new technologies might help protect credit-card shoppers in brick-and-mortar stores, security experts fear thieves will simply switch focus to online card purchases, as has already happened in countries where most credit cards have EMV chips. The arms race between merchants and thieves is unlikely to ever end.

If you're a credit-card holder who's fed up with the regular weekly warnings to protect yourself if your information was on the database of the latest majo...

Article Image

Identity theft, data breaches -- why are they your problem instead of your bank's?

As a consumer journalist I'm fed up with writing the same damned story over and over, and as a consumer-news reader you're sick of hearing it:

“Hackers broke into the customer database of yet another retailer, data broker, government agency or educational or financial institution. So beware, Reader: you must protect yourself from identity theft. Contact your credit or debit card company and change your account information as necessary. Update any and all automatic-payment plans connected to the affected accounts. Call your bank. Change your passwords. Keep an extra-sharp eye on your account activity. Take out a credit alert. Get a credit freeze. Call the following toll-free customer-service numbers and spend a couple hours waiting on hold until you're disconnected and have to call back. And don't forget to contact either TransUnion, Equifax or Experian to let them know about the breach! If you're lucky, maybe this time neither Experian nor the other two will screw up and sell your confidential data to an identity thief way the hell over in someplace like Vietnam — okay, you've done all this? Great! Now kick back and relax for a week or two until you have to do it all over again, the next time hackers break into the customer database of yet another retailer, data broker, government agency or ….”

Why is this still a problem? Why in hell's name do financial companies still operate according to the fiction “Hey, here's a form filled out with Jennifer's own Social Security number, date of birth and full name – by Zod, that must be her, because nobody else on the planet could possibly have this super-secret information. Let's lend thousands of dollars in high-interest, unsecured debt based on that! Then, if she calls to complain that this is not her debt and she is not responsible for repayment, she'll have to spend lots of time and effort jumping through hoops to prove her innocence, and of course she won't receive a single penny in compensation for her time, since it's worthless to us and what she thinks about it is irrelevant....”

Usual suspects

Who actually does have access to my name, SSN, DOB and other presumably “confidential” data about me? In addition to close family members, and various hackers through the years who broke their way into databases they had no business accessing in the first place, a partial listing of people who can access my private, top-secret, “nobody knows it except me” identifying information includes:

Various employees of every local, state or federal tax department I've ever paid money to.

DMV employees in the states where I've held driver's licenses.

Employees of the two state universities I attended.

Employees of every financial institution through which I've taken out a loan, or held a savings or investment account.

The HR/personnel staff at every job I've ever held.

The HR/personnel staff at every job my now-husband ever held with me listed as his health-insurance dependent or life-insurance beneficiary.

Employees of every insurance company I've dealt with: medical, dental, auto, life and renters' insurance.

The staff of every hospital, medical or dental center where I've sought treatment or had a checkup.

Every pharmacist who's ever filled a prescription (and dealt with the required insurance paperwork) for me.

Every landlord from whom I ever rented a place to live (I haven't bought a house yet, but when I do, add realty agents and mortgage brokers to this list).

Possibly the employees of the K-12 public school districts I attended back in the day; I have no idea how long they keep such records on file.

And maybe the federal workers with access to U.S. military personnel-budget files, since I spent my entire childhood as an active-duty-Navy dependent; again, I have no idea if records from my days as a legal minor would still be around.

I'm sure there's a few I forgot to mention here. And you, of course, have a similar list of all the many, many people whose jobs grant them access to your personal identifying information. That list is separate from, though occasionally overlaps with, the list of people and institutions who have or can get your bank, credit card or other financial account information.

Yet the bulk of our entire financial-services industry (at least the part you need to worry about, where identity theft is concerned) seems committed to the idea that either none of these people exist, or every last one of them is completely, 100% trustworthy and responsible.

What's at stake

The strange thing about identity theft is that, while you're supposed to “protect your identity,” ultimately it's the bank's money at stake here: if someone steals your identity and borrows money (or buys a cell phone) in your name, it will be a very annoying and time-consuming process for you to straighten out the mess, but at least you're not liable for whatever money and property the lender lost.

So how, exactly, did it become your responsibility and mine to protect the assets of lending institutions who we might never even have done a lick of business with, because they're too careless to verify a borrower's identity before lending out their own money?

Back in 2007, I tried finding the answer to that question. At the time, I lived in Connecticut, paid taxes to same and wrote for a (now-defunct) alt-weekly. Meanwhile, some twit at the state Department of Revenue Services decided to put information about 106,000 state taxpayers onto a laptop computer, which then got lost or stolen.

A couple weeks later, I got a letter from the DRS warning that my information was on the laptop. As part of the state's “We're sorry; our bad” make-good efforts, the letter advised me to contact Experian or one of the other credit-monitoring agencies, who would then be legally obligated to put a 90-day “credit alert” on my records.

What does that mean? Over the course of those 90 days until the credit alert expired, if anybody contacted Gigantobank, MegaCellPhone or any similar institution and said “Howdy, I'm Jennifer, here's my SSN and DOB to prove it, now gimme hundreds if not thousands of dollars' worth of unsecured high-interest debt,” Gigantobank, MegaCellPhone et al. were required to make a “good-faith effort” (exact quote from the DRS) to determine this genuinely was me, before saddling my financial record with the legal obligation to pay back this debt.

Determining you're really you, before making you liable for a debt – that's considered a rare and special high-alert privilege, not the default setting. And should you happen to discover the existence of one or more previously unknown credit cards or other loans in your name, it's up to you to prove they're not yours; no “innocent until proven guilty” assumptions apply.

Oh, that's simple

Why can't you just tell the company “I never borrowed this money, and if you think I did then prove it – show me some evidence, my signature, a security-camera image of me filling out the forms in a bank?” Why is the onus on you to prove your innocence, rather than them to prove your liability?

I asked Jay Foley, executive director of the Identity Theft Resource Center, who said, “That's simple -- the fact that your personal information was used to open the account.”

Except it's not really “my” personal information, is it? It's not just me, my mother and some laptop thief in Connecticut who knows all of my “personal information” -- it's everyone on that earlier list plus everyone I forgot to put on it, and hackers from all over the world. So that temporary, special-privilege “credit alert” – the radical idea that a credit-card company shouldn't issue a credit card in my name without first making a “good-faith effort” to ensure it's actually me – why isn't that standard procedure?

In 2007, Jay Foley said it's because proper identity verification would make it impossible for stores to offer instant, on-the-spot credit; instead, people who applied for a card might have to wait several days before they get it. “If it fell to credit card companies to prove the individual opened the account, [I couldn't get same-day credit] if I walked into a Kmart, or a Wal-Mart, or a Sears.”

Heaven forbid anybody wait a day or two before getting a shiny new store credit card; that would leave time enough for second thoughts, and consumers might even decide “You know, in light of my not-too-good financial situation, maybe I shouldn't buy these inflatable floating color-changing LED bathtub lights after all ... or at least wait until I can afford to pay cash, rather than buy on the installment plan.”

Brand-new accounts

And, of course, the problem of ID thieves opening brand-new credit accounts in your name is entirely different from the problem of ID thieves getting your legitimate credit-card or financial information out of some corporate or government database, and using it to fund an intense, short-lived spending spree.

Nowadays, you can barely go more than a week without hearing another hacked-customer-database story. In just the past month, such data-theft hackings were discovered at Home Depot, The UPS Store, Dairy Queen, SuperValu grocery and liquor stores, Community Health Systems (a for-profit hospital network you've never heard of although they operate in 29 states), JP Morgan Chase and other banks … and that list is almost certain to grow longer before the end of the month.

Remember: when thieves steal with credit cards in your name, you're not legally liable for all the money the credit card company lost – but you do have to spend time straightening out the mess, and take extra care to ensure the various data brokers who decide your credit score know about it, because a low credit score means you must pay higher interest on any loans or service plans you take out, and in certain instances you can even be denied a job if your credit rating is deemed “too low” … but if you're unjustly denied a mortgage or even rejected for a job because some lender or data broker screwed up and dragged down your credit score, too bad. You have no legal recourse at all.

As for how much longer banks and other lenders can continue eating the cost of the hackers' frequent spending sprees in lieu of changing their operating procedure to make them less frequent — your guess is as good as mine. Meanwhile, brace yourself for the next time hackers break into a customer database with your information on it, and you must take steps to protect yourself from identity theft, monitor your accounts, call all these numbers and ….

As a consumer journalist I'm fed up with writing the same damned story over and over, and as a consumer-news reader you're sick of hearing it: “Hackers br...

Article Image

Reasons you might be rejected for a credit card

With all those credit card offers that come in the mail, you might think you can have your pick of credit cards.

Don't count on it. Just about anyone with a pulse is getting those notices that they have been “pre-qualified” for a credit card. The truth is, neither you nor anyone else has been pre-qualified.

You may be getting these offers for any number of reasons; the zip code in which you reside, the model car you drive, other credit or charge cards you might have.

But the credit card company can't offer you an actual credit card yet because it hasn't had a peek at your credit file. Once it has, it might not be returning your phone calls.

Consumers often take it personally when they apply for a “pre-qualified” credit card, only to be turned down. But something ugly in your credit report is not the only reason a credit card company declines your application.

What other reasons are there? We asked the National Foundation for Credit Counseling (NFCC) and they came up with 10.

Not enough credit

You need credit to get credit, it seems. It's like getting turned down for your first job because you don't have work experience. Credit card lenders believe in patterns.

They want to see how you've handled other credit. You can build your case by getting a retail store charge card, using it to make a small purchase, then paying the bill immediately.

Poor pay history

Been late on a few bills? Word has a way of getting around and ending up in your credit file, which lowers your credit score.

You can raise your score by paying all of your bills on time, every time. It's as simple as that.

Maxed out

If you have a credit card or two and they're maxed out, it looks like you're in over your head. It doesn't exactly inspire a credit card company to extend you more credit.

NFCC says your credit card debt should equal no more that 30% of your available credit.

Too much debt

Mortgage, car payment, credit card bills – it can add up to a lot of money. If it looks like too much money, relative to your income, it can raise a red flag. Do you really need to take on more debt? Maybe the credit card company is doing you a favor by declining your application.

Too many inquiries

Every time you apply for credit, the potential lender pings your credit file. The credit bureaus keep track of these inquiries, which themselves become part of the record.

What's a credit card lender to think if you've applied for 3 other cards in the last month? They probably think you may have a financial problem.

Serious nastiness

There could be something in your credit report that that's an instant turn off. And the trouble is, the worse the problem – unpaid tax lien or Chapter 7 bankruptcy – the longer it lingers in your file.

Other reasons

In some cases, a credit card company might not think you make enough money. The credit card you're applying for might have a $10,000 credit limit and the lender decides your income isn't high enough to risk it.

A very common reason for rejection is job status. If you've just switched jobs, a lender is likely to wait to see how it works out. If you've moved from job to job in a short time, it might also be a reason to say no.

You might be considered too young. That's often the case when teenagers apply for their first credit card. Being a signer on a parent's account might be a good first credit card, while helping to establish your creditworthiness.

Finally, there might simply be an error in your credit application. Maybe you gave the wrong information or left something out.

Filling out the form online might be a way to cut down on mistakes since online forms prompt you when you leave out important information.

Remember, if you are denied credit because of something in your credit report, the Fair Credit Reporting Act gives you the right to be notified of the reason. If the information is in error, you can then appeal to the three credit reporting agencies – Experian, Equifax and Trans Union, to remove the incorrect information.

With all those credit card offers that come in the mail, you might think you can have your pick of credit cards....

Article Image

Feds warn credit card companies against deceptive marketing

If your mailbox is typical, it's full of attractive-sounding offers from credit card companies offering low- or no-interest deals on purchases and balance transfers. But the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) says some of those offers may not be quite as good as they sound.

It's warning card issuers to be careful they're not using deceptive tactics to lure consumers into signing up, and put them on notice that they must clearly disclose the costs and risks of these promotional offers so consumers understand what they are signing up for.

“Credit card offers that lure in consumers and then hit them with surprise charges are against the law,” said CFPB Director Richard Cordray. “Before they sign up, consumers need to understand the true cost of these promotions. Today, we are putting credit card companies on notice that we expect them to clearly disclose how these promotional offers apply to consumers so that they can make informed choices about their credit card use.”

The CFPB bulletin highlights concerns around the marketing of credit card interest-rate offers such as balance transfers, deferred-interest offers, and convenience checks.

Under these promotions, consumers are often charged a fee to transfer a balance or make a purchase with their credit card in order to receive a promotional interest rate on that amount for a set period of time. While consumers pay no interest or a low interest rate for balances subject to the promotion, any additional purchases consumers make with the credit card may incur interest charges right away.

Grace period

The Bureau believes some companies’ marketing materials do not clearly disclose that consumers must pay off the promotional balance by their due date to avoid racking up unexpected interest charges on routine purchases for which they were not charged interest previously. For some consumers, these surprise charges can make the cost of transferring a balance more expensive than revolving the same balance on their existing card.

These marketing tactics specifically impact consumers who enjoy an interest-free “grace period” on their credit card purchases. Consumers who pay off their total credit card balance each month receive a grace period during which they do not have to pay interest on purchases.

When consumers carry their promotional credit card balance past their payment due date, they lose their grace period and are charged interest on all new purchases. The only way for these consumers to avoid interest charges on new purchases made with the credit card is to pay off their whole statement balance, including the promotional balance and the new purchases, by their monthly billing due date.

Consumer tips

The CFPB is also publishing consumer tips today about credit card interest-rate promotions and how grace periods work. Tips for consumers who decide to accept a promotional offer include:

· Avoid the interest: Consumers that do not carry a balance can take advantage of promotional rates and avoid unexpected interest if they don’t make new purchases with the card until they pay off the entire balance. To avoid interest charges on new purchases, these consumers should consider paying with cash, debit, or another credit card that doesn’t have a balance.

· Make payments on time to avoid surprise charges: Consumers should be sure to make payments on time. For promotional and deferred-interest balances, consumers should pay off the entire balance before the end of the promotional period.

· Compare the interest rates among credit cards. Consumers that carry a balance on all their credit cards should compare the interest rates among their cards to decide which is the best deal for new purchases. These consumers should also consider paying for new purchases with cash or debit.

If your mailbox is typical, it's full of attractive-sounding offers from credit card companies offering low- or no-interest deals on purchases and balance...

Article Image

Home Depot customer database hacked?

Home Depot may be the latest addition to the list of companies that suffered a security breach after hackers broke into their customer-information database.

Security blogger Brian Krebs reported the news on Tuesday morning. A Home Depot spokesperson, reading from a prepared statement, told him:

“I can confirm we are looking into some unusual activity and we are working with our banking partners and law enforcement to investigate. Protecting our customers’ information is something we take extremely, seriously and we are aggressively gathering facts at this point while working to protect customers. If we confirm that a breach has a occurred, we will make sure customers are notified immediately. Right now, for security reasons it would be inappropriate for us to speculate further but we will provide further information as soon as possible.”

Krebs' sources say that on Sept. 2, multiple banks noticed a new pile of stolen debit and credit card accounts offered for sale in the cybercrime underground that morning, account information apparently stolen from Home Depot's database.

Though no detailed information is currently available to explain just how this was discovered, presumably it's because the various banks noticed that all of the stolen credit- or debit-card numbers from the most recent batch had one thing in common: they'd all been used to buy something from Home Depot.

Connected to others

Consumers rate Home Depot

Based on the currently available evidence, the Home Depot hackers appear to be Russian or Ukrainian, and connected with other recent hackings at P.F. Chang's, Sally Beauty Supply, and Target:

In what can only be interpreted as intended retribution for U.S. and European sanctions against Russia for its aggressive actions in Ukraine, this crime shop has named its newest batch of cards “American Sanctions.” Stolen cards issued by European banks that were used in compromised US store locations are being sold under a new batch of cards labled “European Sanctions.”

(Actually, even if these hackers do indeed prove to be from or sympathetic to Russia, there is one other possible interpretation for their actions: They're greedy thieves who intended this for their own gain anyway, but decided to claim patriotic, love-of-country motivations because – hey, why not?)

According to Krebs, there's no information yet confirming how limited or widespread the breach is, but early reports indicate all 2,200 Home Depot locations in the United States were affected. At 1:50 on Monday afternoon (Eastern time), Krebs updated his initial report to say:

Several banks contacted by this reporter said they believe this breach may extend back to late April or early May 2014. If that is accurate — and if even a majority of Home Depot stores were compromised — this breach could be many times larger than Target, which had 40 million credit and debit cards stolen over a three-week period.

If you have made a credit- or debit-card Home Depot purchase at any time since last April, contact your bank or card issuer at once, and take all necessary identity-theft precautions.

Russian or Ukrainian hackers connected to earlier thefts believed responsible...

Article Image

Your FICO score might rise this fall

Fair Isaac is about to get a little less unfair, as the formula used to calculate people's FICO scores is being revamped to reduce the impact of medical debt and old bills which have been paid off.

FICO stands for Fair Isaac and Company, a financial/analytical company whose primary customers are banks, credit-card companies and other financial entities.

Your personal FICO score is supposed to help lenders know how likely you are to actually pay back any money you might borrow. The higher your FICO score, the greater your perceived creditworthiness and (in general) the lower the interest rate you'll be charged for any loans or financial services you take out, anything from credit cards to wireless-phone plans to your home mortgage.

It's not too much of an oversimplification to say “The way FICO works is, if you don't pay your bills your score goes down, especially if those unpaid bills make it to a collection agency.”

Glaring problems

In many cases this makes perfect sense. If, for example, someone has the regular habit of maxing out credit cards, buying things on store credit and rarely paying those bills on time, chances are that someone isn't very good at handling money, and is a poor risk to repay any funds you might lend them.

But, critics of FICO said, there were two glaring problems with this measurement scheme, with medical debt being the biggest one. The current FICO system makes no distinction between, for example, discretionary debt purchases versus medical emergencies not covered by insurance: it figures debt is debt, so where your personal creditworthiness (read: trustworthiness) is concerned, it doesn't matter if you're $50,000 over your head because you or your spouse had an expensive medical emergency, or $50,000 in the hole because you keep putting luxury vacations on your credit card — the same stigma of financial recklessness clings to you either way, and you'll still be charged higher interest rates as a result.

Under the new plan, medical debt still counts against your FICO score, but will have less weight – if unpaid medical debt is the only black mark against your credit rating, your FICO score could rise by as much as 25 points.

The second problem involves any sort of debt (medical or otherwise) that goes unpaid long enough to go to a collection agency, but is then paid off in full. Under the current FICO system, that debt still drags your credit score down for seven full years after it's been paid off, but once the new calculations come into play, those paid-off debts will no longer count against your score.

The new revised FICO scores are expected to come into use sometime this fall. If you're thinking of applying for a car loan or home mortgage, signing up for a new cell phone plan, or engaging in any other financial transaction where you must pay interest, and your FICO score currently has black marks due to already-paid-off debt or currently unpaid medical bills, try holding off on that loan for another couple of months, until the new FICO scores come into use: you might qualify for a higher score and a better interest rate then.

Fair Isaac is about to get a little less unfair to consumers, as the formula used to calculate people's FICO scores is being revamped...

Article Image

Hackers steal credit card numbers and other data from Goodwill stores

Bad news for thrift-store shoppers: though details remain sketchy, it appears certain that hackers have breached the customer credit-card database of Goodwill Industries.

Security blogger Brian Krebs first broke the news on Monday, after his sources reported that financial institutions have been tracking a new series of fraudulent credit-card purchases. Though the fraudulent charges have mostly been made in major supermarkets or big-box retail stores, the stolen card numbers' common point of purchase appears to be Goodwill stores in at least 21 different states: Arkansas, California, Colorado, Florida, Georgia, Iowa, Illinois, Louisiana, Maryland, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, New Jersey, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Texas, Virginia, Washington and Wisconsin.

It's not known exactly how long this breach has existed, but Krebs' sources said it might stretch as far back as the middle of 2013.

If you have, in the past year, bought anything at a Goodwill store (especially in one of those listed states) and paid with a credit, debit or money card, your account information might be in the hands of identity thieves. Even if you shopped at a store in one of the other states, you might still be at risk – it's too early to tell if the previous list is all-inclusive.

A Goodwill spokeswoman told Krebs that the company “was contacted last Friday afternoon [July 18] by a payment card industry fraud investigative unit and federal authorities informing us that select U.S. store locations may have been the victims of possible theft of payment card numbers. … Goodwill Industries International is working with industry contacts and the federal authorities on the investigation. We will remain appraised of the situation and will work proactively with any individual local Goodwill involved taking appropriate actions if a data compromise is uncovered.”

Bad news for thrift-store shoppers: though details remain sketchy, it appears certain that hackers have breached the customer credit-card database of Goodw...

Article Image

Wocket Wallet: Is it the wallet of the future?

NXT-ID, a biometric authentication company, is rolling out a new product it believes will replace the traditional wallet, while significantly reducing the threat of identity theft.

The product is Wocket Wallet, a slender wallet with a small space for your drivers license and picture of your kids and an electronic device that stores all your credit cards.

The company has begun taking orders for Wocket Wallet and this week began airing a commercial for it on cable network CNBC.

It's an intriguing idea. The stored data is only accessible by the owner through a combination of biometrics, personal PIN or pattern. Once the device verifies your identity, you use the touch screen display to select whatever soft-card or information you want. In some configurations, the device will respond to your voice commands.

What it stores

The company says the Wocket will store credit, debit, ATM, loyalty, gift, ID, membership, insurance, ticket, emergency, medical, business, contacts, coupon, and virtually any other card that currently makes your wallet as thick as a phone book.

At $149.99, it's considerably more expensive than any wallet you've ever owned, unless you tend to shop at luxury retailers.

It stores all payment cards and other dynamic stripe cards by swiping them directly into the device during the initial set-up process. Bar codes and text, such as voter registration, loyalty and/or membership cards, may all be scanned or entered into the device as well.

Once stored, all information is encrypted by the owner’s personal biometric stamp and can be accessed via a low power touch screen or optionally, a voice command. But how do you actually buy something with it?

It took a little digging through the promotional material to find out. Pictures of the Wocket show it as a device too thick to slide through a card reader.

But it doesn't have to. The Wocket is actually two parts – the device that stores all the data and a plastic card that temporarily receives the chosen card's data for a single transaction. This brief video clip illustrates the process.

Some adjustment

The process might require a bit of getting used to. Selecting a card electronically requires a few more steps than simply reaching into your wallet and pulling out a card.

But NXT-ID is pointing to the trade-offs. Users don't have to dig through all those cards whenever they buy something. And the information on the cards is secure. If lost or stolen, it can't be used by someone else.

Because it's an electronic device, you'll have to recharge the Wocket Wallet – something you obviously don't have to do with your old fashioned wallet. And when using two cards back to back – a loyalty card and credit card, for example, it's a two step process.

There are other digital wallets and digital wallet apps for your smartphone. Google Wallet, for example, was released in 2011, providing a way for users to store cards on their phones. However, it requires a PayPass terminal to make a purchase.

Soundview Technology Group, a technology-focused investment banking firm, issued a favorable report on the Wocket at the end of June, based on observing consumer interaction with the product at a launch event in New York.

“All the feedback we received from attending suggests that consumers who get a chance to see and understand it, immediately want one,” the firm said in a release.

NXT-ID, a biometric authentication company, is rolling out a new product it believes will replace the traditional wallet, while significantly reducing the ...

Article Image

American Express antitrust trial gets underway

A long-simmering antitrust case against American Express is getting underway this week in a New York federal district courtroom. It could result in merchants being free to offer discounts to consumers who use cards other than American Express.

The government is arguing that American Express unlawfully inhibits competition by insisting that its merchants not express a preference for one card over another.

Consumers rate American Express Platinum Card (amex)
Merchants pay about $50 billion a year to card companies -- usually about 2% to 3% of each transaction. American Express' fees are higher than many other cards. Critics say the higher fees are passed along to all consumers in the form of higher prices.

It's not just American Express, of course. Airline credit cards and other cards with high rewards attached charge merchants more to cover the cost of the premium programs. 

Many consumer advocates and merchants argue that consumers who use cards that carry cheaper fees deserve a discount.  

The Justice Department filed its case against Amex in 2010. In 2012,  Visa, MasterCharge and a number of big banks paid more than $6 billion to settle price-fixing claims and agreed to let merchants use discounts, rebates and other tactics to get customers to use cheaper, more generic cards. 

The trial, which is being conducted before a judge with no jury, is expected to last most of the summer. 

Held hostage

The government argues that American Express presents merchants with a "take-it-or-leave-it" attitude -- forcing them to accept American Express cards for all purchases or not accepting Amex cards at all.

AmEx argues that its customers prefer to use their American Express cards because the company offers superior service. It has a reputation of being more supportive of its cardmembers in so-called "chargeback" disputes and also offers generous perks on some of its more expensive cards.

American Express tells merchants that their cardmembers tend to make more big-dollar purchases than consumers who carry other credit cards.  It also argues that it isn't big enough to be an anticompetitive force in the marketplace. It has about 53 million members compared to the more than 400 MasterCharge and Visa cards in circulation.

A long-simmering antitrust case against American Express is getting underway this week in a New York federal district courtroom. It could result in merchan...

Article Image

How hackers profit: a look inside a professional “carding shop”

You've seen the story countless times: “Keep an extra-sharp eye on your credit card activity! There's been another hacking.” The only difference is in the details: which particular retailer, service provider, financial entity, data broker or governmental institution got hacked? For how long? And how many customers got hurt this time?

You know why the hackers keep doing this: so they can use your personal information, such as credit card numbers, to fraudulently obtain money or other valuables for themselves. But have you ever wondered exactly how a criminal armed with nothing more than “your credit card number” uses that to steal things?

Security blogger Brian Krebs spent some time undercover (in the online sense of the word) at a professional “carding shop,” an online black market where unscrupulous people buy and sell stolen data to each other. As the name suggests, carding shops specifically focus on stolen credit card data.

Krebs investigated a particular carding shop called McDumpal's (“dump” is slang for the strings of data fraudulently lifted off the magnetic strips on the backs of most American credit cards).

Of course the thieves who operate McDumpal's have absolutely no affiliation with McDonald's hamburgers — despite McDumpal's using an obvious ripoff of the Golden Arches logo over the slogan “I'm swipin' it.”

Krebs made a slideshow of what he found at McDumpal's — in addition to providing a detailed written account of how the business works (other than the obvious “Try not to get caught, or even noticed by, the law-enforcement agencies of any country in the world, because you're a thief and what you're doing is rightfully illegal everywhere”).

Krebs' story and slideshow are definitely worth checking out if you have the time — although hopefully, in a couple of years words like “dumps” to refer to data stolen from magnetic credit-card strips will be completely obsolete, if and when all major American card providers make good on earlier promises to switch away from magnetic strips in lieu of adopting EMV chip technology.

You've seen the story countless times: "Keep an extra-sharp eye on your credit card activity! There's been another hacking." The only differenc...

Article Image

EMV security chips coming to Sam's Club credit cards

In April we reported an upcoming change to Walmart and Sam's Club credit cards: the old Discover logo changed to MasterCard. While investors in the companies involved reacted quickly to the news, it was too early yet to know if cardholders would see any real changes to their accounts.

On June 4 came news of a huge change which ultimately might affect not merely Sam's Club and Walmart customers, but all American credit card holders: the new Sam's Club credit card will feature EMV chip security technology. Sam's claims to be the first major American retailer to do this.

EMV stands for Europay, MasterCard and Visa. Last March we reported that MasterCard and Visa announced plans at some point to introduce EMV chips to American credit cards (they're already standard in much of the rest of the world, and have been for the past decade).

The difference between current cards and EMV is that the latter stores information on an encrypted microchip, rather than on the non-encrypted (and relatively easy to counterfeit) magnetic strip found on current American credit cards. EMV cards also require a personal identification number (PIN) at point of sale. The idea is that a thief who knows your credit card account number can no longer make and use a fraudulent credit card with that alone.

“MasterCard has taken a strong stance on the need for the U.S. market to make the transition to chip-enabled credit cards for the benefit of cardholders and merchants alike,” said Chris McWilton, president North America, MasterCard. “This move by Sam’s Club makes them a trailblazer in getting chip cards in the hands of businesses and consumers, and leading the push toward a safer and more secure customer experience. This will no doubt help drive chip-enabled technology forward here in the U.S. as it gains more traction.”

MasterCard and Visa have supposedly set an October 2015 deadline for retailers to more broadly adopt EMV technology.

In April we reported an upcoming change to Walmart and Sam's Club credit cards: the old Discover logo changed to MasterCard. While investors in the compani...

Article Image

4 ways to boost your credit score

When you apply for a loan – such as a mortgage or auto financing – the lender runs a credit check and is required to give you a copy of your credit score.

A few consumers are pleasantly surprised at how high it is. Most, however, are shocked at how low it is. Fortunately there are things you can do to raise your score.

1. On-time payments

The most important step is actually the easiest, although it does require a measure of discipline. It's paying your bills on time. All of them, all of the time.

Nothing impresses the credit agencies more than timely payments and nothing will drag your credit score lower than consistently being late on payments. Sometimes it is just a matter of getting organized, knowing when bills come due and making payments before the due date.

Sometimes it's a matter of having enough money available to pay your bills on time. If that's the case you need to create a household budget and eliminate some expenses. No, it isn't easy but it's a necessary step to having a stable cash flow, which will enable you to make on-time payments.

2. Pay down credit card balances

The second step is to pay down credit card balances. Too many consumers carry too much debt.

Credit agencies look at how much available credit you have and how much of it you have used. If you have a $10,000 credit limit and the balance is only $2,500 that looks pretty good. If the balance is $8,500 it looks a lot worse.

But paying down an $8,500 credit card balance isn't easy, especially with an interest rate of around 20%. That's why you need to consider transferring the balance to a credit card that charges no interest.

Does such a thing exist? Yes, but only for a limited time. A number of credit cards charge 0% interest for an introductory period, as long as 21 months.

You'll pay a balance transfer fee, usually 3%, but you'll quickly compensate for that. If you could make monthly payments for more than a year and have 100% of the payment go toward what you owe, you'll make significant progress in reducing the balance.

If you only make the minimum payment and are charged 20% interest, most of your payment will just pay interest.

3. Avoid unnecessary new accounts

Even though we've just suggested you open another credit account, the third step is to avoid opening unnecessary credit accounts. When you're shopping at a retailer and the clerk says you can save $20 if you open a store charge card, politely decline.

Credit agencies do, in fact, want to see a few credit accounts in your credit history but they don't want to see too many. They also want to see a variety – not just credit and charge cards but an auto loan and a mortgage.

4. Use credit responsibly

Finally, it is important to use credit responsibly. What does that mean exactly? In short, it means not adding to existing balances if you can help it.

Before using a credit card, ask yourself if you will be able to pay for the purchase, in full, when the bill arrives, or over a couple of billing cycles. If you can't, don't buy it.

Credit agencies are impressed if they see you can make a large credit purchase one month and pay off the balance the next.

What's a good credit score, you ask? The highest possible score is 850, but 720 on up is considered excellent credit. If your score is between 689 and 630 you have average credit. Below 630 lands you in the bad credit camp.

Your score makes a difference when you apply for a loan or even when you try to buy car insurance, in some states. Lenders give the best terms to consumers with the best credit. Being in that category can save you $100 or more a month on a mortgage.

When you apply for a loan – such as a mortgage or auto financing – the lender runs a credit check and is required to give you a copy of your cr...

Article Image

Payday loans, debt collection, credit reports -- all have big problems

If you're looking for abusive and slipshod practices, look no further than the payday loan, debt collection and credit reporting businesses, which are now under federal supervision for the first time.

That's the gist of a lengthy report from the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB), which has been surveying the three industries before wading in to take enforcement actions.

Examiners said they found many problems in the three groups of "nonbank" businesses, including flaws in how they respond to consumer complaints and how they identify issues that may cause problems for their customers.

Payday lending

Payday loans sound good. They're a way for consumers to handle cash flow shortages between paychecks but they often lead to long-term debt at ruinously high interest rates.

The CFPB found that payday lenders engage in deceptive practices to collect debts, including threatening consumers with legal actions that they, in fact, do not intend to take. This qualifies as an unlawful deceptive practice.

CFPB examiners said they also found instances of payday lenders illegally harassing borrowers at work, calling them multiple times a day and even visiting their workplace. 

The examiners said many payday lenders hire third-party debt collectors but fail to supervise them to be sure they don't engage in unlawful and deceptive practices, including falsely claiming to be an attorney and making false threats of criminal prosecution.

Debt collection

It's estimated there are more than 4,500 debt collection firms in the U.S., generating a heavy volume of complaints, many of them similar to those encountered by customers of payday lenders.

Deceptive claims about litigation and arrest were among the most frequent problems. The examiners found that debt collectors frequently violate the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) by filing lawsuits, which implied that they intended to prove their claims, when they had no such plans.

The collectors typically dismissed the suits if consumers answered them because they were then unable to produce the documents to support their claims.

Debt collectors were also found to be making excessive, illegal calls to consumers. Examiners found that one debt collector had made approximately 17,000 calls to consumers outside of the appropriate times established by the FDCPA. That company further violated the law by repeatedly contacting more than 1,000 consumers as often as 20 times within two days.

Debt collectors also were found to be derelict in failing to investigate consumer credit report disputes.

Credit reporting agencies

The examiners also found numerous problems at consumer credit reporting agencies, most notably failing to properly handle consumer disputes.

The agencies are generally required to forward dispute documents to data furnishers -- the companies with which the consumer did business -- but often fail to do so, the examiners found.

What next?

So now that the CFPB has completed its examinations, what happens next?

The agency said that when its examiners find problems, they alert the companies responsible for them and, if appropriate, the CFPB opens an investigation that can lead to enforcement actions.

$70 million returned

The report also notes that recent actions have returned more than $70 million in remediation to approximately 775,000 consumers.

“For the first time at the federal level, nonbank financial institutions are subject to supervisory oversight that holds them accountable for how they treat consumers,” said CFPB Director Richard Cordray. “The CFPB’s oversight of banks and nonbanks alike is exposing risky practices and getting results for consumers. We are pleased that our supervision program has been able to return more than $70 million to consumers in recent months.”

Under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 (Dodd-Frank Act), the CFPB has authority to supervise certain nonbanks, including mortgage companies, private student lenders, and payday lenders, as well as nonbanks the Bureau defines through rulemaking as “larger participants.” 

If you're looking for abusive and slipshod practices, look no further than the payday loan, debt collection and credit reporting businesses, which are now...

Article Image

What Millennials need to know about credit scores

Recent surveys have indicated that the Millennial generation, those 18 to 34 years old, have adopted prudent, frugal habits when it comes to money.

They shun debt, tend to use cash, and see the value of saving money. Coming of age amidst a near-economic collapse and resulting Great Recession will form those kinds of attitudes.

But a new survey shows one area where Millennials come up short financially. They're pretty much in the dark when it comes to their credit score and why it is so important.

The survey by the Consumer Federation of America (CFA) and VantageScore Solutions, LLC shows Millennials know less about credit scores than other adults. They know less about the businesses that use the scores, less about who collects information on which the scores are based and less about how scores can be improved.

Bad information

For example, they are more likely than other adults to think that credit repair companies can always or usually be useful in removing errors and improving scores. In reality, the best way to raise a credit score is to pay your bills on time.

Because of this knowledge gap, Millennials are less likely than other adults to take advantage of the federal law that allows you – once a year – to get free copies of your credit report from all three credit reporting agencies.

“Obtaining their free credit reports not only allows consumers to check the accuracy of the reports but also appears to motivate them to learn more about credit scores,” said CFA Executive Director Stephen Brobeck.

Looking in the wrong places

Because of a lack of knowledge or awareness about credit reports, Millennials may also be prone to look in the wrong place for their credit report. There are a number of commercial services that offer credit reports – some even saying it's “free,” but there is always some service you have to sign up for in order to obtain the report.

The easiest way – and the way with no strings attached -- to obtain a credit report is to visit www.annualcreditreport.com or call a toll-free number, 877-322-8228.

What else should Millennials know about their credit score? For one thing, having and using some credit is helpful to your credit score.

For example, if you have a couple of credit cards and charge a few regularly-budgeted items like groceries and gasoline each month, it helps your credit score – if you pay the full balance each month. That last part is important.

Responsible use of credit

Credit agencies look at how much credit you have and how you use it. If you carry a credit card balance, the credit card companies will love you but it lowers your credit rating. Paying off the balance in full each month tells creditors you use credit responsibly.

Millennials should also know that that credit card issuers and mortgage lenders will use these scores when deciding whether or not to extend credit and at what rate. The better your score the lower your interest rate.

Experian, the credit reporting agency, offers a couple of other points of credit advice. Only apply for a new credit account when you need it. Don't open an account just to get a discount on a purchase.

Also, Experian says you should not open accounts just to have a better mix of credit. In fact, it probably won't help you score.

Balance transfer cards don't help

Balance transfer credit cards are a popular way to reduce credit costs but moving credit around doesn't help your score. Better to pay off debt rather than move it.

Don't close unused credit accounts thinking that will help your credit score. In fact, it is likely to have the opposite effect. Owing the same amount of money but having access to less credit will lower your credit rating.

Millennials, by and large, don't kid themselves about their credit knowledge. Only 40% think they have good or excellent knowledge about credit scores, while 62% of those 35 years and older think they have this knowledge.

The survey did identity a group of Millennials that actually possesses a lot of credit information. Those who have obtained their credit reports know more about credit scores than those who haven't.

Recent surveys have indicated that the Millennial generation, those 18 to 34 years old, have adopted prudent, frugal habits when it comes to money.They s...

Article Image

Security breach at Michaels and Aaron Brothers craft stores

Michaels arts and crafts stores confirmed this week that there was definitely a security breach involving certain card-payment systems used by the company (and its subsidiary Aaron Brothers), though it is not yet known whether the breach compromised any customer data.

The Michaels breach took place between May 8, 2013 and Jan. 27, 2014, whereas the Aaron Brothers breach was between June 26, 2103 and Feb. 27 of this year.

If you used a credit, debit or prepaid card to buy things at the affected stores during the relevant time periods you'll definitely want to keep a closer-than-usual eye on your financial accounts, although it's still not certain whether any customer data was compromised at all; Michaels has said in a statement that there's no evidence of such.

Michaels arts and crafts stores confirmed this week that there was definitely a security breach involving certain card-payment systems used by the company ...

Article Image

Consumer debt delinquencies expected to rise

Nearly 5 years after the end of the Great Recession the economy has yet to gain much traction. Consumers who normally drive economic growth have seen their incomes stagnate.

Even though economists are hopeful that 2014 will bring stronger growth, there is growing concern about the economic health of the consumer. The people at U.S. and Canadian banks, whose job it is to measure risk, are growing more pessimistic.

In its latest quarterly survey, FICO, an analytics software company, found 44% of the risk managers it surveyed expect delinquencies on credit cards to increase in the next six months.

More troubling, perhaps, is the 35% who expect delinquencies on car loans to increase. Auto sales have been one of the recovering economy's few bright spots.

Rising risk?

This appears to be part of a troubling trend since it's the fourth straight quarter of rising pessimism about consumers' ability to pay their auto loans and credit card bills.

"We've seen concerns about delinquencies creeping up for a few quarters," said Andrew Jennings, chief analytics officer at FICO and head of FICO Labs.

Not alarmed

But Jennings isn't ready to sound an alarm. He suggests rising delinquencies may simply mean that more consumers are now able to borrow money and that a certain percentage will always have trouble paying it back.

"This can be interpreted as a healthy sign after lenders spent much of the past five years constricting credit availability and being risk-averse,” he said.

The FICO survey also shows banks expect consumers to increase their borrowing over the next 6 months. A record 65% of respondents expected average balances on credit cards to increase. At the same time, 61% of the bankers polled said they expect the amount of new credit requested by consumers to increase.

What we can learn from debt

Economist Joel Naroff says a distinction should be made between car loans and credit card purchases. Big-ticket purchases like cars have a need requirement to them and vehicle sales are a huge driver of growth

“Credit card purchases are a good indicator of spending activity – most is paid down monthly -- but also consumer confidence,” Naroff told ConsumerAffairs. “Since growth is measured by changes in levels, it is the combination of the two that can make a major difference. Total consumer debt is growing at a pace similar to what we saw in the 2000s, which is a sign that confidence is returning.”

The Federal Reserve has also been keeping an eye on growing consumer debt. It reported last year that non-revolving debt – things like car loans – increased by 8%. Of greater concern, however, was the 61% jump in college loan debt since 2010.

In its most recent report, for February, the Fed found student loans and auto loans continued to be the main objects of consumer borrowing, with both categories rising by the largest amount in 12 months.

Total consumer borrowing for the month rose $16.5 billion, up from $13.5 billion in January. Credit card debt, meanwhile, declined.

Nearly 5 years after the end of the Great Recession the economy has yet to gain much traction. Consumers who normally drive economic growth have seen their...

Article Image

Fees should not be the only prepaid card consideration

Prepaid money cards have taken the place of banks for millions of consumers. They use them to receive direct deposit checks and to make debit card purchases.

These cards can have significant fees – making them more expensive than a bank – but there are many cards that now have very low fees, making them an attractive choice.

In a recent survey, Bankrate.com found that fees vary widely from card to card.

Not all the same

"Not all prepaid cards are created equal," said Greg McBride, CFA, chief financial analyst for Bankrate.com. "Some have many fees, some have few; some will waive or reduce monthly fees, others won't; some permit free in-network ATM withdrawals, others don't."

The survey found that 83% of reviewed cards charged a monthly service fee but that 33% would waive the fee, depending on how much money was loaded onto it.

Fewer cards now charge you for using it to make purchases. Point of sale fees are now almost rare, with only 17% of cards charging for a PIN-based purchase.

Customer service is important

But fees are not the only consideration when it comes to selecting a prepaid card. Just as it would be when choosing a bank, customer service is also very important.

Here's why -- increasingly scammers are using prepaid cards to receive money from victims.

In the past, Western Union wire transactions were the money transmission means of choice. Once a victim wired the cash, it couldn't be traced or retrieved.

A prepaid card is almost as good. Now that consumers have become aware of the dangers of wiring cash, scammers are relying more on prepaid cards.

The companies issuing prepaid cards are well aware of this and have instituted a number of security measures designed to prevent fraud. While this is generally to be applauded, it can create problems for some consumers.

Catch-22

Back in November, Reyna of Hayward, Calif., ran into something of a Catch-22 when she lost her Upside prepaid debit card and called to request a new one. She also mentioned that she had just moved and needed the card sent to her new address.

That ended up creating all kinds of problems because Reyna did not yet have any documentary evidence showing her new address. The customer service agent told her that he could not send it to her old address – her parents' home – because she had already told him she had moved.

After several days of trying to resolve the issue, Reyna says she became frustrated and decided to start over with a new company.

“I've cancelled my direct deposit and all electronic debits,” she wrote in a ConsumerAffairs post.

Tax refund problems

Consumers using their prepaid cards to receive their federal income tax return have reported running into problems, again for the same reason. Since scammers are using prepaid cards to receive bogus tax refunds, card issuers have tightened up security.

Bernice of Denver had her tax refund direct deposited to her Rush Card.

“Today I get a text message advising they blocked my account and I need to call immediately, which I did,” she writes. They advised me that because I recently moved my account is now under investigation!”

Of course, a new address can set off alarm bells because a scammer would obviously use a made-up address. But the result was that Bernice had to provide documentation showing she was who she said she was before her money could be released.

Chances are consumers using any prepaid card would run into these kinds of complications under similar circumstance. Some companies, however, might be better equipped to resolve the issues in a more timely matter than others.

Reputation is important

The bottom line – researching a company's customer service reputation might be just as important as finding out about its fee structure.

And while you are at it, compare the cost and ease of use with a bank. Some bank products may be surprisingly competitive. In fact, McBride thinks prepaid cards should supplement the traditional banking structure, not replace it.

"Call me old fashioned, but if you're going to build wealth and save and invest for the future, you need to be part of the traditional financial system," he said.

Prepaid money cards have taken the place of banks for millions of consumers. They use them to receive direct deposit checks and to make debit card purchase...

Article Image

Safer credit cards might finally come to America

Scarcely a week goes by without various news media publishing stories on the theme “Hackers break into corporate database, steal account info from scads of customers.” Same story every time, differing only in the details: which particular company got hacked, what exact number of customers were affected, and which specific white-hat hacker or security blogger first exposed the breach.

Also, these stories usually end by saying “If you, American Consumer, bought anything from the hacked company recently, you need to call your bank and cancel your account and re-organize any automatic payment plans attached to it, and if you do everything right this shouldn't cost any actual money from your pocket, but 'doing everything right' will still be a hugely time-consuming pain in the butt for you. No, of course you won't be compensated for any of your lost time.”

American consumers are more likely to suffer from such hacking incidents than credit or debit-card holders almost anywhere else — not because American computers are easier to hack into than their counterparts in other countries, not even because American credit or debit-card account numbers are easier to steal, but because American account numbers, once stolen, are much easier for thieves to use. However, credit-card heavyweights MasterCard and Visa might finally be taking steps to change that.

EMV chip

MasterCard and Visa announced today that they had formed a “new cross-industry group focused on enhancing payment system security.” The initial phase of this enhancement will be adopting what's known as “EMV chip technology,” which is already ubiquitous in most of the world but absent in the United States (hence the relative ease with which thieves can make use of stolen American account numbers).

EMV stands for “Europay, MasterCard and Visa,” the three companies that first developed the technology. It's been around since the early 1990s and has been in common use throughout the world (except the U.S.) for roughly a decade now.

At first glance, an EMV credit card looks like any other. The difference is that an EMV stores information on an encrypted microchip, rather than a non-encrypted (and relatively easy to counterfeit) magnetic strip.

EMV cards also tend to require a personal identification number (PIN) at point of sale.

These features do not make it impossible for hackers to steal money from accounts, but they definitely make theives' lives vastly more difficult.

Why so slow?

So why haven't EMV cards already become commonplace in America? Answer: the short-term cost of implementation; Reuters mentioned unnamed experts who estimate conversion costs of up to $10 billion.

But the increasing frequency of data breaches in America (and the increasing costs to the credit-card issuers, who usually have to eat the cost of whatever an identity thief buys with his stolen account numbers) has finally persuaded the major card companies that maybe they ought to upgrade their anti-theft systems.

Unsurprisingly, the National Retail Federation supports the proposed security upgrades, and promptly issued a press release saying so. NRF's senior vice president, Mallory Duncan, said of the current American security status quo: “Easy-to-forge signatures are a virtually worthless form of authentication. Insisting on chip-and-signature cards is like installing an alarm on the front door of a home while leaving the back door wide open.  It doesn't make sense when the technology exists to secure the entire house.”

Scarcely a week goes by without various news media publishing stories on the theme “Hackers break into corporate database, steal customers' account info" ...

Article Image

American Express to focus on "Busy Mom" market

American Express is coming out with a new rewards card aimed at what it calls the “busy mom” market, complete with an advertising campaign featuring real-life Busy Mom Tina Fey.

I'll admit to an inherent distrust anytime a company says it plans to take a gender-neutral product and market it specifically “to women,” which usually boils down to “color it pink and then quadruple the price.” (No exaggeration; when the Bic ballpoint pen company decided to market lady-specific pens called “Bic For Her,” it gave the pens pastel-colored casings and a price tag more than quadruple standard genderless Bic pens.)

To be fair, the forthcoming Amex EveryDay card seems to focus on substance rather than style: no word yet on what color the card will be, but The New York Times reports that this card is intended for the “multitasking, carpool-driving, Starbucks-hopping, grocery-shopping mom. To appeal to her, the card …. offers a twist on the standard rewards formula: In addition to earning one reward point per dollar charged (double points for supermarket purchases in the United States up to a total of $6,000) card holders will get 20 percent bonus reward points after making 20 or more purchases, no matter how small, in a single billing cycle.”

Pay in full

Side note: if you do use your credit card to pay for groceries or other daily-living expenses, make sure you pay off your balance in full, every month. 

Of course, you should always try paying off your balance in full anyway, to avoid paying the high interest charges credit cards apply otherwise. But it's especially important to avoid high-interest debt for everyday living expenses: carrying a balance for a couple months might be unavoidable if you have no cash reserves, so your card is the only way you can afford a necessary car repair or some other emergency expense. But if you do carry a balance, and thus make interest payments in addition to the actual price of whatever you bought, don't make it worse by adding ordinary grocery or gas charges to your bill; pay such expenses in cash until your credit card balance goes back down to zero.

American Express originally offered charge cards, an entirely different product from credit cards; charge cards have to be paid in full every month, whereas credit cards offer the dubious opportunity to carry debt over from month to month (and, if you carry the debt long enough, you end up paying interest charges higher than the original cost of whatever you bought). The EveryDay card is a credit card.

TheNew York Times also quoted Josh Silverman, Amex's president of consumer products and services, as saying this about the intended EveryDay card user: “She uses debit and credit cards about twice a day and more than 40 times a month.”

Twice a day? More than 40 times a month? What the hell is this woman buying? Ah, wait, she's a Starbucks drinker — one coffee per workday is at least 20 purchases a month right there.

If you're a financially strapped mom (or financially strapped dad, or childfree person for that matter), brewing and drinking your own coffee at home is a better financial move than getting an extra Amex reward point for every dollar you blow at Starbucks. But then, in all fairness, Amex said it's aiming the card at “busy” moms, rather than “moms whose financial outlook would be considerably improved if they'd cut back on discretionary spending, or at least stop putting it on a high-interest credit card.”

American Express is coming out with a new rewards card aimed at the “busy mom” market, with an advertising campaign starring Tina Fey...

Article Image

Too much debt can kill a romance

In recent years couples – young couples in particular – have begun to put more stock in financial responsibility as a relationship criteria. A low credit score, it turns out, can be a deal breaker.

A 2013 survey by a division of Experian found 96% of women listed “financial responsibility” as an important trait in a mate. Ninety-one percent of men found it important. 

Now, a new survey commissioned by the National Foundation for Credit Counseling (NFCC) has found that large amounts of debt can be toxic for romance. According to the survey, 37% of respondents would not marry someone until their debt was repaid. Ten percent would marry but not help pay the debt while seven percent would take the somewhat extreme action of breaking off the relationship.

While love and romance have long been grounded in physical attraction, money is beginning to hold greater sway. Undoubtedly the tough economic times that have prevailed since the 2008 financial crisis have played a big role. But it isn't just about money.

Indicator of other problems

“When considering the negative ramifications of debt, people may not realize that the associated problems can go beyond credit scores and interest rates. Debt can also have serious, long-lasting personal implications,” said Gail Cunningham, spokesperson for the NFCC. “It appears that debt overrides love, at least temporarily, when deciding to move forward in a relationship. It’s money over marriage.”

The increasing role of debt in the decision to take a casual relationship to the next level may be particularly true with young adults who emerge from college with tens of thousands of dollars in credit card and student loan debt. If two young people start their working lives, each with credit card and student loan debt, the total could easily be six figures. It's like paying a mortgage but not getting a house.

Since nearly half of all marriages in America now end in divorce, it's easy to conclude that financial strain is at least a contributing factor. Cunningham says it's no surprise that people are reluctant to start off on the wrong financial foot.

Negative consequences

Having too much debt can make it harder to qualify for loans. Having a low credit score – perhaps because of late payment on that debt and other bills – just compounds the problem. With a low credit score it can be difficult to qualify for a home mortgage or buy a car, rent an apartment, obtain insurance or land a job.

It's true that both people in a couple have individual credit scores. Your mate's score doesn't affect yours, except in one important respect.

At some point both of you, as a couple, may need to pool your financial resources in order to take out a loan for a major purchase. In this case, one person’s low credit score may torpedo the approval, or if the lender extends credit, it may be at a higher interest rate.

However, there is a way to improve the credit of one party in the couple. If the person with good credit opens an individual account, then adds the person with a low credit score, that low score will rise, as long as the account is kept current and the debt balance is not excessive.

Love and money

In the end, says Cunningham, love and money cannot be separated. Daily life is all about making financial decisions. If one party makes good decisions on a regular basis while the other makes bad decisions, discord is certain to follow.

Talking about money early in the relationship is one way to make sure it goes to the next level, if that's what both people want. That means sharing all sources of income, existing debt obligations, credit reports and scores, along with personal preferences about decisions involving loaning money to family and friends, or attitudes toward spending and saving.

In recent years couples – young couples in particular – have begun to put more stock in financial responsibility as a relationship criteria. A...

Article Image

Is your check any good? Certegy thinks it knows

If you're a merchant, landlord or similar businessperson, credit-reporting agencies, check-verification companies and other data brokers offer valuable services to help protect you against fraud.

But if you're an honest everyday person, and you're trying to rent an apartment, take out a loan or pay for something by check, chances are you take a dim view of such companies, especially since the only way you're likely to hear about them in the first place is if they flag you as a risk, which you only discover after your check is declined, loan application denied or some other unpleasant financial consequence befalls you.

Last month, for example, we told you about complaints we'd received from people whose holiday-shopping attempts became far more difficult after merchants subscribing to the check-verification service Telecheck declined their checks despite sufficient funds in their accounts.

Similar complaints come from people who had the same problem with Certegy.

“Certegy declined my Dept of Treasury refund check without giving a valid reason,” a California consumer said. And Lori from Pennsylvania said: “Today I visited a Michael's Craft store and wrote a check for $25.33 only to have it declined.”

“I went to HEB to cash a check for cash. I cash checks there often and today it was declined. I called the number on the card I was given, but I did not get through to anyone. Apparently, there were too many customers waiting," said  Irma of San Antonio.”

Why does this happen? Certegy doesn't reveal the reasons behind its decisions but denies that it relies on a consumer's credit score.

"[Y]our credit score is not a factor in our risk models or any decision provided to merchants. Decisions are made based on information in Certegy's check writer database and a statistical analysis of your check compared to all checks that have gone through our system," the company says on its website.

What to do

What can you do to avoid this problem? Certegy did not respond to our request for comment on this story, so the only information we were able to glean comes from the company's Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) page. 

In short, Certegy says there is nothing that can be done to override the company's decision to decline to approve a check. But, on the other hand, the fact that one check is declined doesn't mean the next one will be. 

Of course, the opposite is also true. Just because today's check is approved doesn't mean tomorrow's will be.

However, Certegy does offer a "VIP" program that may provide some help to creditworthy consumers:

In order to assist you in possibly avoiding a decline in the future, you can complete and submit to Certegy a Certegy VIP Enrollment Form. Membership in the Certegy VIP program is free. By completing the Certegy VIP Enrollment Form, we can assess any additional information not provided with your original check transaction. The additional information will elevate your check acceptance level in our system and help you to avoid most types of declines in the future. 

If you would like more information on how you can become a member of the Certegy VIP program to assist in future purchases using your checking account, you can click here to download and print the Certegy VIP Enrollment Form. 

How many consumers are enrolled in this program and how helpful it is to them are enrolled are, for the moment, unknown since we were unable to entice a human being at Certegy to speak to us.

Who's the customer?

Consumers rate Certegy

Here's a problem — when we said “customers” complained about Certegy, that's not exactly the right word. You see, where check-verification companies like Certegy are concerned, you, the consumer, are notCertegy's customer; the store is.

There's a similar problem regarding credit-rating agencies like Experian and TransUnion — they rate would-be borrowers (whose financial lives are strongly affected by those ratings), though their actual customers are the would-be lenders.

This paradox has plagued Americans for over a generation now. Back in 1990, the syndicated humor columnist Dave Barry shared the story of a then-new offer he'd received in the mail:

This was an offer to sell me my own credit rating. Yes. One of the great benefits of living in America is that, regardless of your race or religion or hygiene habits, you are entitled to have a credit rating maintained by large corporations with powerful computers that know everything about you.... [if] I give them $20 a year, they'll let me see my information. The offer states: "Financial experts recommend that you carefully review your credit report twice a year to check its information and make certain that it is accurate."

In other words -- correct me if I am wrong here -- they're telling me that I should give them $20 a year so I can look at the information about me that they collected without my permission and have been selling for years to God alone knows who so I can see if it's incorrect.

Yeah, pretty much. Luckily, the legal landscape has shifted a bit since 1990; there are more laws intended to protect consumers. Among other things, you're legally entitled to at least one free copy of your credit report every year, rather than being forced to pay $20 as Barry was. (However, do not trust any company that offers you a “free” credit report, yet demands your credit card number first.) 

Just for the record, the one and only place you can get your free annual credit report is https://www.annualcreditreport.com/index.action. 

Certegy fined $3.5 million

It's not as though financial date and credit reporting firms are completely unregulated. Last August, the Federal Trade Commission levied a multimillion-dollar fine against Certegy the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA).

Under the FCRA, consumers whose checks are denied based on information Certegy provides the merchant, have the right to dispute that information and have Certegy correct any inaccuracies.

The FTC’s complaint claims, among other things, that Certegy did not follow proper dispute procedures. The complaint further alleges that Certegy failed to follow reasonable procedures to assure maximum possible accuracy of the information it provided to its merchant clients, as required by the FCRA.

Customer service is always bad when you're not the actual customer...

Article Image

Illegal credit card practices to cost American Express millions

More than 335,000 consumers who were victimized by American Express's illegal credit card practices will be collecting millions of dollars in restitution.

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) has ordered the financial services giant to refund an estimated $59.5 million for engaging in pratices that the agency says include unfair billing tactics and deceptive marketing with respect to credit card “add-on products” such as payment protection and credit monitoring. The company has also been ordered to pay an additional $9.6 million in civil penalties.

“We first warned companies last year about using deceptive marketing to sell credit card add-on products, and everyone should be on notice of this issue,” said CFPB Director Richard Cordray. “The order, he said means refunds for “thousands of American Express customers who were harmed by these illegal practices. Consumers deserve to be treated fairly and should not pay for services they do not receive.”

The CFPB isn't the only agency getting its pound of flesh. The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) is fining American Express Centurion Bank $3.6 million, and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) is fining American Express Bank, FSB $3 million. This is the fourth action the CFPB has taken in coordination with fellow regulators to address illegal practices with respect to credit card add-on products.

Misleading marketing

The CFPB says its examiners discovered that, beginning in 2000 continuing through 2012, three of American Express’s subsidiaries and their vendors and telemarketers engaged in misleading and deceptive tactics to sell some of the company’s credit card add-on products. One such product, a payment protection product called “Account Protector,” allowed consumers to request that 2.5% of their outstanding balance, up to $500, be canceled if they encounter certain life events like unemployment or temporary disability.

Among other things, American Express misled consumers about:

  • The benefits of the payment protection products: Some consumers were led to believe that if they bought the Account Protector product, their minimum monthly payment would be canceled if they experienced a qualifying life event. In reality, the benefit payment would be limited to 2.5% of the consumer’s outstanding balance -- up to $500. In many cases, that amount was less than the minimum payment due.
  • The length of coverage of the payment protection products: Consumers were led to believe that the benefit periods for Account Protector would last up to 24 months. In fact, only two of the 13 qualifying events with benefit periods had benefit periods of up to 24 months. The other 11 qualifying events had benefit periods of only one, two, or three months.
  • The fees associated with payment protection products: American Express or its vendors would claim that there would be no fee if the balance in the account was paid off every month, without disclosing that the account balance had to be paid off before the end of the billing cycle, which was an earlier date than the consumer’s statement due date.
  • The terms and conditions of the Lost Wallet product: American Express used telemarketing sales calls conducted in Spanish to enroll the vast majority of Puerto Rico consumers in this product. Yet American Express did not provide uniform Spanish language scripts for these enrollment calls, and all written materials provided to consumers were in English. As a result, American Express did not adequately alert consumers during the calls about the steps necessary to receive and access the full product benefits.

Unfair billing and other illegal practices

American Express also engaged in unfair billing practices related to its “identity protection” add-on products. These products supposedly include a service to monitor the card members’ credit information. To obtain credit monitoring services, consumers generally must provide written authorization. American Express, however, charged many consumers for these products without or before having the written authorization necessary to perform the monitoring services. As a result, the company:

  • Billed consumers for services they did not receive: Consumers were charged fees as soon as they enrolled in identity protection add-on products, even when American Express or its vendors had not yet obtained the authorization necessary to begin monitoring the consumers’ credit information. American Express did not inform consumers that they needed to complete a second step in the enrollment process to obtain all of the advertised benefits. Approximately 85 percent of consumers who enrolled in the identity protection products paid the full product fee without receiving all of the advertised benefits. In some cases, consumers paid for these services for several years without receiving all of the promised benefits.
  • Unfairly charged consumers for interest and fees: The unfair monthly fees that customers were charged sometimes resulted in customers exceeding their credit card account limits. This then led to additional fees for the customers. Some consumers also paid interest charges on the fees for services that were never received.
  • Failed to inform consumers about their right to a free credit report: Federal law requires that when telemarketing sales calls are made that include offers of free credit reports, the call must include a disclosure about the consumer’s right to a free credit report from a federally authorized source. In some solicitations, American Express did not make the required disclosure.

The hammer drops

American Express subsidiaries have agreed to correct their practices and refund consumers who were harmed by the illegal practices. Specifically, they have agreed to:

  • Stop deceptive marketing: American Express must cease selling the Account Protector, Identity Protection, and Lost Wallet Puerto Rico add-on products until it has submitted a compliance plan to the CFPB. The plan will be designed to eliminate all deceptive or unfair practices and violations of other laws relating to the sale, marketing, and administration of these products and to ensure that these unlawful acts do not occur again.
  • End unfair billing practices: Consumers will no longer be billed for certain identity protection products if they are not receiving the promised benefits. American Express also must take steps, subject to the CFPB's approval, to ensure these unlawful acts do not occur in the future.
  • Pay restitution of approximately $59.5 million to more than 335,000 consumers who purchased the products: American Express has already provided refunds to many consumers and must make further refunds. These American Express entities will be paying restitution to consumers who purchased the Account Protector, Identity Protection, or Lost Wallet Puerto Rico add-on products. American Express must submit a plan for remediation to the Bureau. Once the plan has been reviewed, the American Express entities must begin promptly implementing the remediation.
  • Provide refunds or credits without any further action by consumers: If the consumers are still American Express customers, they will receive a credit to their accounts. If they are no longer an American Express credit card holder, they will receive checks in the mail. Consumers are not required to take any action to receive their credit or check.
  • Submit to an independent review: An independent third-party will help ensure the refunds have been provided in compliance with the terms set forth in the CFPB’s order.
  • Review other credit card add-on products: American Express must hire an independent third-party to review American Express’s other credit card add-on products for compliance with federal consumer financial laws. If any compliance issues are found, American Express must submit a plan to the Bureau explaining how it will correct those violations and provide remediation if necessary.
  • Improve oversight of third-party vendors: The CFPB is also requiring that American Express continue to strengthen its management of third-party vendors who manage these add-on products.
  • Pay a $9.6 million penalty: The CFPB has ordered that American Express pay a $9.6 million fine to the agency's Civil Penalty Fund.

More than 335,000 consumers who were victimized by American Express's illegal credit card practices will be collecting millions of dollars in restitution....

Article Image

First class actions filed against Target after massive security breach

In the race for justice, the prize often goes to the swift. And in this case, one of the top finishers was Los Angeles attorney Robert Ahdoot, who raced to San Francisco U.S. District Court yesterday and filed a class-action lawsuit -- dated 1:37 p.m. -- against Target for its role in what's being called the second-largest data breach in history, the theft of credit- and debit-card information on up to 40 million customers.

Ahdoot's suit, on behalf of named plaintiff Jennifer Kirk, claims that a blogger, Brian Krebs, first revealed the massive identity theft on Wednesday "before Target made any attempt whatsoever to notify affected customers," Courthouse News Service reported.

Target has not exactly covered itself in glory so far. It told customers it was sorry and then gave them some paternalistic advice about checking their credit report and keeping a close eye on credit card accounts. It didn't offer to pay for any additional protection.

Analysts of all stripes are lambasting the company for its feeble response and predicting dire consequences.

"There's a level of trust that's diminished and there is perhaps a loss of goodwill," said Daren Orzechowski, a partner at law firm White & Case in New York, who focuses on information technology legal matters, including privacy. The breach "could affect people who choose not to go to those [Target] stores versus a competitor," he told Advertising Age. 

"Inadequately designed"

Target has said the stolen data includes names, credit card numbers, expiration dates and the three-digit security codes on the backs of cards, but it claimed online purchases were not affected.

The leading speculation among cyber security experts is that hackers extracted the purloined data from the card-swipe machines used to process in-store payments, rather than invading Target's corporate information system.

"It appears that the majority of this information was taken from the point-of-sale (POS) machines themselves, which were infected by malware that intercepted the data itself during the magstripe swipe," said Kevin O'Brien, director of product marketing at CloudLock, in an analysis of the breach quoted by DarkReading. "The most likely scenario is the attackers hacked their way to a central relay point, where they could snag credit cards coming through for processing."

O'rien said it "is clear that the security and monitoring systems in place were inadequately designed and managed."

"Ham-handed"

As Kirk's class action suit notes, Target knew about the breach for four days before it bothered to tell customers. Even then, it didn't offer to do anything to help those whose data it had lost, a circumstance it has so far ignored in its public statements.

"We wanted to move swiftly to address the issue. This is a very important holiday week but our focus is on the guests," said Dustee Jenkins, a Target spokeswoman. "We want to reassure people that they can shop at Target."

"The reaction to it has been very ham-handed," said consultant Craig Johnson of Customer Growth Partners in the AdAge account. "You have to get out in front and communicate. No company is perfect but when an issue arises, when there's a theft or fraud thing….you want your customers to hear about it first from you."

Kirk's suit seeks class certification, damages and punitive damages for unfair competition, privacy invasion, negligence, conversion and other charges.

In the race for justice, the prize often goes to the swift. And in this case that would be Los Angeles attorney Robert Ahdoor, who raced to San Francisco U...

Article Image

CareCredit, GE Capital ordered to refund $34 million to consumers

GE Capital Retail Bank has been ordered to refund up to $34.1 million to as many as 1 million consumers who may have been talked into signed up for CareCredit credit cards by their doctors and dentists.

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau announced the action today, saying that many consumers who signed up for the cards to help pay their medical bills thought they were interest free. But in fact, they were accruing interest that kicked in if the full balance was not paid at the end of a promotional period.

“Medical debt is already a big problem for many Americans. Poor credit card transparency should not be making the problem even worse,” said CFPB Director Richard Cordray. “Deferred-interest products can be risky for consumers in the best of circumstances, and today’s action ensures that CareCredit will no longer profit from consumer confusion. The Bureau will not tolerate financial companies that take advantage of patients and their loved ones.”

CareCredit offers personal lines of credit for health-care services, including dental, cosmetic, vision, and veterinary care. Doctors, dentists and other medical providers and their office staff, such as office managers and receptionists, are the primary sellers of the product, offering it as a payment option for their patients. The product is sold by more than 175,000 enrolled providers across the country. There are about 4 million active CareCredit cardholders.

Deferred interest

Approximately 85 percent of CareCredit borrowers are placed in a deferred-interest financing plan. Under this “no interest if paid in full” plan, consumers make monthly payments while CareCredit assesses 26.99 percent annual interest on a consumer’s balance throughout a promotional period, which can range from six to 24 months. If any portion of the balance has not been paid when the promotional period ends, the consumer becomes liable for all of the accrued interest.

According to the CFPB order, since January 2009, consumers who signed up for the credit card frequently received an inadequate explanation of the terms. Many consumers, most of whom were enrolled while waiting for health-care treatment, incurred substantial debt because they did not understand how they could have avoided deferred interest, penalties, and fees. The CFPB began investigating CareCredit after receiving hundreds of complaints from consumers.

During the course of its investigation, the Bureau found evidence of:

  • Deceptive enrollment processes: The CFPB found that service providers misled some consumers during the enrollment process by not providing adequate guidance clearly laying out the terms of the deferred-interest loan. CareCredit’s limited involvement during the enrollment process and lack of oversight and monitoring allowed this deception to continue.
  • Inadequate disclosures: Many consumers did not receive copies of the actual CareCredit agreements and instead had to rely only on the oral explanations given by the service provider or office staff. Many consumers were enrolled on the belief that it was an interest-free card, and did not understand that they were actually agreeing to a deferred-interest product with a 26.99 percent interest rate.
  • Poorly trained staff: Many staff members in the health-care offices, who were responsible for explaining the CareCredit agreement to borrowers, had received little or no training by CareCredit, and relied only on pamphlets. In interviews with CFPB investigators, some providers admitted that they were themselves confused by the deferred-interest card.

GE Capital Retail Bank has been ordered to refund up to $34.1 million to as many as 1 million consumers who may have been talked into signed up for CareCre...

Article Image

A 'masked' credit card could be marketer's nightmare

Cyber security experts have cautioned consumers this holiday season to use extra care in making online credit card purchases. Scam operators have stepped up their efforts to take advantage of consumers in search of great deals.

“Especially around the holiday season we get these email's with great deals that almost look too good to be true,” said Rob Shavell, co-founder of Boston based Abine, a software firm specializing in privacy. “But there are some great deals out there and some are totally legitimate. Sometimes it's hard to tell them apart. You never quite know where your information is going when you buy or sign up for something online.”

Shavell's company provides a tool called Mask Me, which can be added to a web browser to prevent websites you visit from gathering too much personal information, such as email addresses, phone numbers, and credit cards. That stops them from tracking you online. When you use MaskMe, the websites see “masked” information. The user can decide when and if to disclose real information.

Mask your credit card

One feature of MaskMe is the ability to mask your credit card, which Shavell says is a way for consumers to safely make purchases online. It's part of the $5 a month MaskMe package but through the holiday period, Abine is allowing consumers to use the masked card feature at no change. All you have to do, he says, is download the software from the Abine website.

“Once you've done that you don't have to do anything more because our software will give you the choice to make a masked credit card or not,” Shavell said.

At the point you are asked to type in your credit card number for any online purchase and the software then gives you the option of masking it. If you choose to mask it, the vendor gets credit card information that is similar to that of a gift card or pre-paid debit card. They can only charge the amount the consumer has authorized. The online vendor, however, doesn't know the difference.

“It's a real, working Mastercard that has a limit which you, the consumer, give to the vendor,” Shavell said. “For an online business it's just a regular Mastercard and it goes through their system just like any other credit card would.”

Eliminates unauthorized charges

While it has obvious benefits to keep fraudsters from loading up your credit card with unauthorized purchases, the masked card is also a way to keep businesses from placing charges on your credit card for things you didn't ask for and don't want. In fact, that could be its biggest benefit.

“We've all signed up for something that has some fine print that says there's a recurring charge of $10 every month,” Shavell said. “Just make a masked card for $10. That way you'll never have to pay that company more than $10, unless you really want the service.”

The practice Shavell just described is negative option marketing. That's when a company starts with the assumption that you have made a purchase, usually for some type of subscription service. It's up to you to cancel the service or get charged $10 to $20 a month. Many consumers don't notice these charges until they have paid them for several months and often, cancelling is not that easy. A masked card, it would seem, would prevent that abuse.

“We encourage everyone, if they sign up for a subscription or a free trial to use a masked card to limit the amount they can ever be charged,” Shavell said.

Power shift

Over the last decade a number of tools have emerged that have returned more power to the consumer during commercial transactions. Shavell says it's about time.

“What you're seeing is the market is finally waking up because businesses have generally crossed the line and people are now aware of how their privacy is being impacted, they're aware that when they get something for free, when they sign up for a free offer, that they are the product, and they need tools and services that restore their control,” Shavell said.

Cyber security experts have cautioned consumers this holiday season to use extra care in making online credit card purchases. Scam operators have stepped u...

Article Image

A high credit score can be highly rewarding

An excellent credit score makes life a lot easier. It's easier to get an auto loan or mortgage and you usually get the best rate.

Having an excellent credit score can also get you a credit card with rewards and perks. These cards are reserved for consumers with the best credit.

The Capital One Venture One Rewards Card offers 1.25 travel miles for every dollar on purchases. It starts you off with 20,000 bonus miles after you have spent $2,000 on purchases during the first three months the account is open. That adds up to about $200 in travel. 

Miles easy to use

If you've found it difficult to redeem airline miles in the past, never fear. The miles on this card can be used on hotel rooms and rental cars, in addition to air fare. Even using the miles on airline tickets might be a bit easier since they are good on any airline with no blackout dates.

Another nice feature of this card is the 0% interest rate on purchases until December 2014. As you would expect with any rewards card, there is no annual fee.

The BankAmericard Cash Rewards Card gives you a $100 cash rewards bonus if you spend $500 on purchases in the first 90 days the account is open. Instead of miles, this card gives you cash back. 

You get 1% cash back on all purchases. You get 2% cash back on grocery store purchases and 3% on gasoline purchases for the first $1,500 you spend on any combination of gasoline and groceries each quarter.

Extra bonus

If you have a Bank of America checking or savings account and have your rewards dollars direct deposited to that account, you get a 10% bonus. You also get a 0% interest rate on purchases for the first 12 billing periods. There's no annual fee and your rewards don't expire.

The Citi Hilton HHonors Visa Signature Card gives you 40,000 Hilton HHonors bonus points after you spend $1,000 within the first four months the account is open. You earn six HHonors bonus points for every dollar spent at a participating hotel within the Hilton HHonors portfolio. 

In addition you get three HHonors bonus points for every dollar spent at supermarkets, drugstores and gas stations. You get two HHonors bonus points for every dollar spent on all other purchases.

Keeping it simple

The Citi Simplicity Card rewards you in other ways than points, miles or cash. It advertises that you never have to pay a late fee, a penalty rate or annual fee. It also offers a 0% balance transfer rate for 18 months, but the 3% transfer fee makes that much less rewarding if you have a big balance. 

The Capital One Venture Rewards Card gives you two travel miles for every dollar spent on purchases. If you spend $2,000 on purchases within the first three months the account is open you earn an additional 20,000 bonus miles. 

You can redeem these miles for any travel expense, flying on any airline at any time with no blackout dates. There is no annual fee the first year, but after that it will cost you $59 a year to have this card in your wallet.

Improving your credit score

You say you don't have excellent credit? There are steps you can take to improve it so that in the future you can qualify for one of these rewards cards.

According to Experian, the most important thing you can do to improve your credit score is pay all your bills on time. Delinquent payments and collection will deliver a huge hit to your creditworthiness.

Keep your credit card balances low, especially in relation to your credit limit. Having “credit to spare” makes you look like a good credit risk.

Finally, pay down debt as much as possible. It's not always easy to do but whenever you come into some extra money, apply it to your credit balance.  

An excellent credit score makes life a lot easier. It's easier to get an auto loan or mortgage and you usually get the best rate.Having an excellent cred...

Article Image

Avoiding the season's worst financing offers

How are you paying for holiday gifts this year? It's always best to pay with cash, to ensure you don't go over your budget.

But most people rely on some kind of financing, either a credit card or a store charge card. Just remember that not all financing offers are alike and some could make you a lot poorer a few months later.

Ticking financial time bomb

The reason is something called “deferred interest.” It's a ticking financial time bomb usually disguised by appealing headlines like “0% Interest for 12 months” or “Special Financing,” which sound like good deals. And they can be, if and only if you pay off the entire balance within the advertised time limit.

If you take an extra month to completely pay off the balance, then the interest rate that has been deferred all this time suddenly is retroactively applied to the original balance, no matter how much has been paid off.

“When consumers see a no-interest offer, they tend to take that at face value, thinking they’re gaining a true respite from finance charges for the advertised length of time,” said Odysseas Papadimitriou, CEO of Cardhub.com, a financial website that analyzes credit offers. “That’s why deferred interest is both so dangerous and reminiscent of the ‘gotcha’ type of practices that were prevalent prior to the Great Recession and subsequently outlawed by the CARD Act.”

Buried in the fine print

The details about the deferred interest offer are in the fine print of the financial agreement the consumer signs to open the credit account. But if you don't read it, you remain blissfully unaware that you've signed up for deferred interest until you interest charges are suddenly inflated.

According to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) the retailer or credit card company must tell you the date by which you must pay off your balance to avoid being charged deferred interest. That information is required to appear on the front page of your bill. Another thing to look out for – certain deferred interest promotions may run by weeks instead of months, so they might have a different ending date from your regular monthly payment due date.

If you purchase something on a deferred interest plan, your credit card bill may show your purchase as a separate balance from other purchases on which you can’t defer the interest. Transactions at different APRs may also show as separate balances, the CFPB says.

The best and the worst

With the holiday shopping season approaching, Cardhub conducted a study of current credit and financial offers available to consumers. It found that 70% of major retailers offer a financing option. The best deals, the study says, come from retailers that do not use deferred interest. They include Target, Nordstrom, and Gap.

Papadimitriou says the worst financing deals come from retailers that not only offer deferred interest, but also are not very transparent about their policies. On that list he includes Pottery Barn, Amazon.com, Lowe’s, and Macy’s. Making it a bit tougher for consumers this year, nearly half of the retailers offering a financing package this holiday season employ the deferred interest feature.

Not just retailers

It isn't just retailers that make deferred interest offers. The study finds that some credit card issuers do as well, especially during the holiday shopping season. Two companies – Citi and GE Capital – issue nearly two-thirds of all the deferred interest credits.

An advertising headline declaring “90 days same as cash” is not quite right. What it should say is “90 days same as cash if you pay off the entire balance within 90 days.”

Why steer clear of deferred financing options? Not meeting the agreed-to deadline carries steep financial consequences.According to the study, paying off your credit card debt one month behind schedule could increase your financing costs by more than 27 times.

“The average household already has $6,700 in credit card debt, we’re expected to incur $41.2 billion in new debt this year, and the economy is still on shaky ground,” Papadimitriou said. “We don’t need hidden costs adding to our problems.”

How are you paying for holiday gifts this year? It's always best to pay with cash, to ensure you don't go over your budget.But most people rely on some k...

Article Image

Some credit cards offering 0% interest until 2015

One way to save money is to reduce the amount of interest you pay on your credit card balance. If you can pay 0% for a few months you can make speedy progress in paying down your debt.

While all credit card balance transfer offers need to be carefully considered, there appears to be a flurry of new offers for consumers to consider. Best of all, many of them extend to 2015, giving you plenty of time to make interest-free payments.

But understand this – these generous balance transfer offers almost always come with a balance transfer fee, which must be factored in when you weigh the potential savings. The cards below all have a three percent transfer fee, which tends to be on the low end.

The Citi Simplicity Visa Card is offering 0% on balance transfers and purchases for 18 months. After that, the rate could range from 12.99% to 21.99%. The card also advertises no late fee, no penalty rate and no annual fee. The balance transfer fee is $5 or three percent, whichever is greater. 

The Chase Freedom Card offers 0% for the first 15 billing cycles. At the end of that introductory offer the rate will range from 13.99% to 22.99%, depending on creditworthiness. You lose that 0% introductory rate, however, if you are late with a payment or violate any of the other terms and conditions. The balance transfer fee is $5 or 3% of the total, whichever is greater. 

The Discover It Card is offering 0% for 18 months on balance transfers and for six months on purchases. It has no annual fee and is currently offering new card holders a free FICO score with their first statement. It also promises late payments won't raise your interest rate. The balance transfer fee is $5 or 3%, whichever is greater. 

The Capital One Platinum Prestige Card is offering 0% until March 2015 on both balance transfers and purchases. The transfer fee is 3% but there is no annual fee. 

Time is money

Getting a 0% rate for just a few months – six months, for example – can severely cut into your savings if you must pay a balance transfer fee that's 3% or more. What makes the above cards more attractive is the longer period with no interest charges on the outstanding balances.

However, you are paying interest in the form of the balance transfer fee. It might amount to less than 1% or it might be more, depending on the size of your balance. Make sure you understand what your “real interest rate” is before moving forward.

Only one of the extended-period 0% card offers we analyzed also waived the balance transfer fee, making it an attractive offer. The Chase Slate Card is offering 0% for 15 months for both balance transfers and purchases. There is no balance transfer fee for transfers made in the first 60 days the account is open. After that, the transfer fee is 3%. There's no annual fee. 

One way to save money is to reduce the amount of interest you pay on your credit card balance. If you can pay 0% for a few months you can make speedy progr...

Article Image

Report: Prepaid money cards better deal than banks

For years the knock against what are known as General Purpose Reloadable (GPR), or prepaid cards is they carried all sorts of fees that made them very expensive for consumers to use.

Even so, they have become increasingly popular over the last few years, especially with consumers who no longer use a bank. A new report from Bretton Woods, Inc., a management advisory and research firm, explains why.

“Prepaid cards continue to have a cost advantage over basic checking accounts,” said G. Michael Flores, President of Bretton Woods and author of the report. “The three-year trend shows that the average cost a consumer incurs for a checking account is increasing, while decreasing for GPR prepaid cards.”

In fact, banks have added fees to many of their consumer accounts, including checking, and raised minimum balance requirements. While banks have seemed somewhat indifferent about retaining some segments of their customer base, the prepaid card industry has become more competitive, with firms reducing or eliminating fees in a bid to gain market share.

$7.50 or less a month

The Bretton Woods study shows that the majority of consumers who use a prepaid debit card spend $7.50 or less each month in fees, making it less costly than many bank accounts. While using cash for all transactions carries no direct cost, the report found, it does carry security risks, plus the cost and hassle of paying bills with money orders through the mail.

"While similar to checking accounts, prepaid cards fill a critical financial services need for a new generation that prefers the consumer friendly technology, as well as consumers with limited access to checking accounts,” Kirsten Trusko, President and Executive Director or the Network Branded Prepaid Card Association (NBPCA), an industry trade group.

Trusko said the cards appeal to Generation Y and the "underbanked." In addition, they are also beginning to attract the consumers who have traditionally used banks. Lower fees may well be a reason.

The Bretton Woods report found that consumers using basic checking accounts pay $263 to $473 a year for that service. Consumers using a prepaid card with direct deposit pay, on average, $58 to $263 a year in fees.

Not all the same

Just as not all banks are the same – a few still actually offer free checking – not all prepaid cards are the same either. A savvy consumer will shop carefully, noting what fees are charged for particular purposes. Consumers should select a card that has the lowest fees for the services they use most.

For example, if you make a lot of debit purchases, you should choose a card with low or no fees for purchases. If you select a card that does not charge a fee for purchases, you can save on ATM fees by always getting cash back when you make a purchase.

In many respects preloaded cards operate much like a checking account. You can have regular payments you receive, like a pay check, direct-deposited to the card. You can also access your account and pay bills online, sometimes at no extra charge. Most cards now also offer mobile banking as well.

Fees will vary

Most prepaid cards charge some type of monthly fee but they vary widely. For example, the ACE Elite prepaid Visa card carries a $9.95 a month fee while the American Express Serve is only $1 a month – and free in New York, Texas and Vermont.

Learning about a prepaid card's fees might not always be easy. In a report earlier this year, Consumer Reports rated 26 prepaid cards, finding that fee information was often hard to find and difficult to understand.

Its top-rated card was the Bluebird Card, a joint venture between Walmart and American Express. It has no activation or monthly fee.

For years the knock against what are known as General Purpose Reloadable (GPR), or prepaid cards is they carried all sorts of fees that made them very expe...

Article Image

Credit card balance transfers: do the math before you take the deal

To paraphrase something our accountant once said: If Americans all used credit cards responsibly, the credit card industry as we know it would collapse.

She’s exaggerating, but not by much. Credit cards can be a wonderfully useful financial tool — if you pay off your balance in full every month, before you’re charged any interest on the debt. Should you have a credit card debt too high for you to pay off at once, it might be a good deal for you to transfer that balance to a new credit card — if its associated fees and interest rates are lower than you are currently paying. But you need to read the terms of the credit card offer carefully, maybe even get a calculator and do some basic math, to determine whether you’re getting a good deal.

Remember: though credit cards can be helpful financial tools when used responsibly, credit card companies are not charitable institutions; they’re in business to make a profit, and if you-the-consumer aren’t careful, the bulk of that profit will come out of your pocket.

A cautionary tale

Here is the cautionary tale of a woman who wrote us to complain that her new, zero-percent-interest credit card charged her almost $400 in unapproved fees and inflated interest rates — but when we checked out her story we found those fees were completely justified and explicitly spelled out, according to the terms of the agreement.

Sandy C. contacted us earlier this week to say:

“After taking advantage of 'transfer funds @ 0% APR' with Chase Sapphire, I found they are charging me close to $400 for a transaction fee which I don't agree with.  I called and told them I will pay off the transferred amount immediately and for this fee to be waived but they insist it was in writing somewhere on the agreement…. before I took the promotion, I spoke to a live representative [who said] that transferred funds will be separated on the statement so that I wouldn't have to pay interest if I paid in full daily purchases.  I do not normally carry a balance, I took advantage of the promotion because we are doing a renovation.  I do not understand why they can't cancel the transaction and credit the fee since I am telling them I will pay in full, the daily purchases as well as the transferred balance. Please help.”

Hmm. We’ve written countless stories on the theme “Innocent customers cheated by sleazy company via confusing loopholes burrowed deep within the fine print.” Might poor Sandy be the latest example? We asked her to send us copies of her Chase paperwork, plus some additional details of her case.

The problem was apparent

As soon as we looked at that credit card offer, we saw the problem. Sandy’s old credit card had a balance of just over $12,000 (she said she usually pays off her credit card in full every month; the uncommonly high balance is from the cost of ongoing, expensive home renovations). The first document she sent us, a copy of Chase’s “0% APR on transfer balances” offer, included an “Interest and Fee Information” table. Under “APR for Balance Transfers,” it does indeed offer to charge 0% interest on the transferred balance for one year — and under “Fee” it says “The standard fee for Balance Transfers is either $5 or 3% of the amount of each transaction, whichever is greater.”

To calculate 3 percent of a number, you multiply it by .03 [point zero three]. Sandy’s balance transfer was $12,325.06; multiply by .03 and you get 369.7518, which rounds up to $369.76. (In math class you’d round the number down, to $369.75, but companies charging interest or governments charging sales taxes tend to round up in such cases, since rounding down would cost them that extra .0018 of a cent in interest.)

Sandy then charged another couple thousand dollars to her new Chase Sapphire card. The 0% APR offer doesn’t apply to the new charges, of course; Chase is charging full interest on them (though interest charges are not being applied to the original $12K transfer balance, which is "separate" from the rest). So when she wrote us, Sandy’s total balance with Chase was over $14,000.

If she makes only partial payments each month, anything she pays above the minimum payment is used to pay down the old 0% balance, rather than applied to any new, full-interest charges.

Pay in full

When Sandy wrote us with her initial complaint about nearly $400 in transfer fees, she said “I do not understand why they can't cancel the transaction and credit the fee since I am telling them I will pay in full.”

The truth is: if you’re planning to pay your credit card balance in full each month (which, we remind you, is the best way to do it), there is absolutely no reason for you to bother with this Chase Sapphire deal, or any other credit card balance-transfer promotion offering 0% interest after you pay a one-time fee. After all: if you pay your credit card balance in full every month, you’re already paying 0% interest without any added fees.

On the other hand, if you’ve already dug yourself into a credit card hole deep enough that you know you’ll need several months if not longer to pay off your debt, it really is worth paying a one-time 3% fee, to convert a 15% or 18% interest debt into a 0% interest debt for a year. But to make that trick work for you, you have to put your old high-interest debt onto your new 0% card—then put the new card away, pay down its balance and don’t make any new charges on it.

Fortunately for Sandy, she says she can afford to pay Chase her full $14,000 balance — including the unexpected $376 transfer fee. But if she intended to carry a balance for awhile because she needed time to pay it off, we’d tell her to never make another charge on that Chase Sapphire card until her total balance on it goes down to zero.

To paraphrase something our accountant once said: If Americans all used credit cards responsibly, the credit card industry as we know it would collapse.&...

Article Image

Consumers going deeper into debt

Happy days are here again, or so it would appear.

Since 2008 consumers have been paying down their debt and not taking out so much new debt, in part because banks weren't lending. But there appears to have been an abrupt shift. Consumer debt is on the rise again, and so in fact is corporate borrowing.

Of course, not all debt is bad. If it's manageable it allows the consumer to increase purchasing power. Those purchases can stimulate the economy.

In its latest report on consumer credit, the Federal Reserve notes consumer debt increased at an annual rate of 5.5% in August. Revolving credit – things like credit cards – decreased at an annual rate of 1.25% while non-revolving credit – things like car loans -- increased at an annual rate of 8.0%. 

Student loan debt up 61%

The Fed's numbers show consumer credit surpassed the $3 trillion level in the second quarter of the year and has yet to show signs of slowing down. It has risen 22% since 2010. But in addition to buying new cars, Americans continue to go into debt to attend college. In the last three years student loan debt is up 61%.

Credit card debt is among the most expensive there is, with the average rate north of 14%. But since the financial crisis of 2008 revolving debt, which includes credit cards, has been steadily going down.

For example, in 2008 revolving credit debt totaled just over $1 trillion. By the end of 2012 it had fallen to $845 billion.

Non-revolving debt has been increasing in the last five years. It stood at $1.6 trillion in 2008 and by August was running at an annual rate of $2.1 trillion.

Expanded purchasing power

Both businesses and consumers use credit to purchase things that they otherwise would not be able to buy. A house is a good example. Very few consumers can come up with $200,000 to purchase a house so they take out a mortgage for $160,000 to $180,000.

On one hand the availability of credit has an inflationary impact. If no one could borrow money to buy a house then houses would have to cost $10,000 to $20,000 or no one could afford them. But if houses were that cheap then builders could only pay their laborers pennies per hour and could only pay pennies for materials. So the lack of credit can have a deflationary impact.

That's what economic policymakers feared after the 2008 financial crisis when there was little credit available at any price. The fact that both consumers and businesses are able to borrow again – and are doing so – is going to be greeted as good news, as long as the credit is manageable.

Worries about college loan debt

Currently, the biggest worry about unmanageable credit is in college loans. That total has now surpassed the $1 trillion mark, according to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, which has voiced concern about how students will be able to repay their debt.

The agency is not alone. The Institute for College Access and Success estimates the average student will graduate with a loan balance of $26,000. Ten percent are expected to run up more than $40,000 in loans. 

Some economists worry student loan debt is a giant iceberg, waiting to sink not just students but the U.S. economy. True, the debt makes it hard for young people starting a career to buy cars, homes and other things that can help stimulate the economy.

But there is also a bigger worry. Since much of the student loan balance is guaranteed by the U.S. government, it's the U.S. taxpayer that takes the hit if these consumers default.

Happy days are here again, or so it would appear.Since 2008 consumers have been paying down their debt and not taking out so much new debt, in part becau...

Article Image

CARD Act has reduced the cost of credit, study finds

Reduced penalty fees and better explanations of the cost of credit cards are two of the benefits consumers have reaped from the 2009 CARD Act, according to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB).

In its report, the CFPB says the CARD Act, known formally as the Credit Card Accountability Responsibility and Disclosure Act of 2009, also resulted in a decline of 2% in the total cost of credit but notes there are still areas of concern in the credit card market.

“Credit cards play a valuable role in the everyday lives of American consumers,” said CFPB Director Richard Cordray. “The CARD Act brought better consumer protections and fairness to the marketplace, but we found there is more work to be done.”

Sweeping changes

Over 70% of adults have at least one credit card and the CARD Act, which was signed into law in May 2009, made sweeping changes to protect them, including by preventing unexpected interest rate hikes, curbing unfair or excessive late fees, and creating an opt-in requirement for over-limit fees. It also instituted new disclosure requirements designed to make credit card costs clearer for consumers. The CFPB assumed authority for the CARD Act in July 2011.

In preparing its report, the CFPB used data covering most of the credit card marketplace. Based on this information, the report found that:

  • Total cost of credit declined by two percentage points between 2008 and 2012. That includes all fees, interest and finance charges paid by the consumer to the card issuer. The decline has occurred even as annual fees and interest rates have increased, indicating a shift from back-end pricing toward more transparent front-end pricing that consumers can understand and evaluate more easily.
  • Over-limit fees have been effectively eliminated. Before the CARD Act took effect, card issuers could charge an over-limit fee for transactions that put cardholders over their credit limit. Each over-limit transaction could result in an additional over-limit fee. With the law’s requirement that consumers opt-in to fees before they are allowed to exceed their credit limit, the CARD Act essentially eliminated over-limit fees as a source of cost to consumers and revenue to issuers. The report found that consumers paid about $2.5 billion less in over-limit fees than they paid in 2008.
  • Size of late fees declined. The CARD Act required that penalty fees be “reasonable and proportional” to the relevant violation of account terms. The report found that the average size of late fees diminished -- that the average late fee went down by $6 after the CARD Act took effect. That works out to a $1.5 billion decrease in late fees in 2012.
  • Responsible access to credit remains available. As the financial meltdown hit, creditors faced losses and as a result implemented more restrictive credit standards. While the amount of available credit card credit has generally decreased, there is still $2 trillion of unused credit for consumers with credit cards in the marketplace. One factor affecting credit availability is a notable drop in the number of consumers who receive unsolicited credit limit increases on their accounts. Now that consumers have to ask for their credit limit to be raised rather than having it happen automatically, these increases are happening less frequently.
  • Young consumers are better protected from credit cards they cannot afford. Before the CARD Act, it was often too easy for young consumers to rack up unmanageable credit card debt and damage their credit rating. Now, consumers under the age of 21 cannot get a credit card unless they can demonstrate an independent ability to repay the debt or unless they have a cosigner over 21. As a result, the percent of young adults ages 18-20 who have at least one credit card account has dropped by half.

Consumers have responded positively to these changes. When JD Power & Associates released its 2013 U.S. Credit Card Satisfaction Study  , it showed credit card satisfaction at an all-time high since the inception of the study in 2007. The study reported that customers seemed to be increasingly happy with their credit cards, and JD Power attributed some increased satisfaction to the CARD Act.

Areas of concern

While the CARD Act addressed many problematic practices in the market, the CFPB has outstanding areas of concern from today’s report, including:

  • Add-on products: Add-on products are optional services, such as debt cancellation, identity theft protection, and credit monitoring, sold by credit card companies to cardholders. The CFPB has found in some enforcement cases that consumers were being misled by companies into buying these products. Concerns remain about the ways these products are marketed.
  • Fee harvester cards: The CARD Act report recognizes that application fees or other fees charged before an account is opened do not count toward determining whether a card issuer is violating the CARD Act’s rules limiting fee harvester cards. The CFPB will continue to monitor the use of application fees in connection with account openings to determine if it should take action under its available authorities.
  • Deferred interest products: These are credit cards that finance purchases without interest for a period of time. With these products, if the balance is not paid in full by a given date, the accumulated interest is assessed retroactively.

Disclosures

In addition, the CFPB has concerns about disclosures in three different areas:

  • Online disclosures: While the CARD Act requires certain disclosures to appear on monthly statements, those consumers that pay their bills online may not see them. About 25% of consumers pay their bill online or through automatic bill payment. The CFPB intends to watch how card issuers provide consumers with disclosures when they access their account in different ways.
  • Disclosures concerning rewards products: Many consumers are choosing their credit cards based on rewards programs, which can be highly complex, with detailed, confusing rules about how consumers can actually use their rewards. The CFPB will review whether rewards disclosures are being made in a clear and transparent manner and assess whether additional action is warranted.
  • Disclosures concerning grace periods: Most cards allow consumers to avoid paying interest on purchases when they pay their balance in full each month. The period between the end of a billing cycle and the payment due date is called the “grace period.” The CFPB wants to ensure that consumers know that once they carry a credit card balance into a new month, they no longer enjoy the grace period on new purchases.

What to do

The CFPB accepts consumer complaints on credit cards and other financial products and services. You can submit a complaint by:

  • Going online at www.consumerfinance.gov/complaint
  • Calling the toll-free phone number at (855) 411-CFPB (2372) or TTY/TDD phone number at (855) 729-CFPB (2372)
  • Faxing the CFPB at (855) 237-2392
  • Mailing a letter to: Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, P.O. Box 4503, Iowa City, Iowa 52244

Reduced penalty fees and better explanations of the cost of credit cards are two of the benefits consumers have reaped from the 2009 CARD Act, according to...

Article Image

When to use a credit card and when not to

For many consumers, credit card debt is an obstacle to prosperity. Every month you have to pay on the balance, leaving less money for other things.

While it's true you have to write a check for your monthly rent or mortgage, or to make a car payments, those are expenses that buy you something each month. The rent payment gives you a place to live. The car payment gives you transportation.

A credit card payment, on the other hand, gives you nothing, except maybe a case of heartburn at bill-paying time.  If you carry a balance, you are making payments on that dinner out with friends four months ago, a vacation from two years ago, and that expensive piece of exercise equipment you bought last January that is now gathering dust in the corner.

High interest rates

On top of that, a credit card balance carries the highest interest rate of any of your debt, unless you have taken out a payday loan. Low credit card interest rates are around 9% and they can be as high as 30%.

There is a school of thought that says you should charge everything on a credit card that offers a generous rewards program, so that you can benefit from cash back, discounts on travel or other perks. There is something to be said for that, but it requires firm discipline in paying off the balance each month. Otherwise, you could be paying on a couple of years' worth of gasoline purchases at 14.9% interest.

That, in a nutshell, is the danger in using a credit card for all your purchases. Deployed as a component of your budget plan, a credit card can be a powerful and useful tool. Used indiscriminately, without a plan, it can wreck your financial future.

The problem with charging everything is you lose track of what you've charged. You have every intention of paying off the balance at the end of the month. But when the bill arrives, you are shocked at how much you owe. As a result, you pay only a portion, telling yourself you'll pay the rest next month.

But next month the bill arrives and the balance is even bigger. That's how five-digit credit card balances start.

Not as rich as you think you are

Using a credit card for all or most of your purchases also makes you feel wealthier than you really are. You might not worry about whether you can pay for a purchase at that particular moment because the plastic has it covered. Then, of course, the reality of your financial condition returns when the bill arrives.

A good rule of thumb is to avoid using a credit card to pay for consumables. Groceries and gasoline are good examples. Many consumers purchase both more than once a week so, if you are using a credit card, you can quickly lose track of your total spending.

Instead, use cash or a debit card – which is the same a cash, since it comes directly out of your bank account. Once you make the purchase you no longer have the money. It's literally pay as you go.

There are some purchases where security may dictate using a credit card, however. In a restaurant, it's probably best not to let your debit card out of your sight, whereas your liability for fraudulent charges on your credit card is limited. The same is true for making online purchases – using a credit card instead of a debit card is probably safer.

When it makes sense

There are, however, times when using a credit card makes sense. New furniture for the family room might cost more than you can swing in this month's budget. But if you think you can pay it off over three months, a credit card allows you to make the purchase now. Just be sure that you can make those three payments and not add any additional purchases that will derail your payment plan.

If you feel you need to use a credit card for everyday purchases, it is best to have more than one card and use them for their intended purposes only. For example, have one card that is only used to purchase gasoline and nothing else. Just be sure you pay the balance, in full, at the end of each month.

Having credit cards and paying off the balances also helps you improve your credit score, something a debit card doesn't provide. The key is to not over-use it, carefully monitoring your spending, and using a credit card the way it was first intended – quick access to credit for a special purchase.

For consumers, credit card debt is an obstacle to prosperity. Every month you have to pay on the balance, leaving less money for other things.While it's...

Article Image

Chase ordered to refund $309 million to consumers

Chase Bank and JPMorgan Chase Bank have been ordered to refund $309 million in illegal credit card charges to more than 2.1 million consumers. The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) said Chase engaged in unfair billing practices for certain credit card “add-on products” by charging consumers for credit monitoring services that they did not receive.

“At the core of our mission is a duty to identify and root out unfair, deceptive, and abusive practices in financial markets that harm consumers,” said CFPB Director Richard Cordray. “This order takes action against such practices and requires Chase to fully refund more than $300 million to consumers who were charged illegal fees.”

According to the CFPB order, Chase enrolled consumers in credit card “add-on” products that promised to monitor customer credit and alert consumers to potentially fraudulent activity even though many never actually received the service.

In order for consumers to obtain credit monitoring services, consumers generally must provide written authorization. Chase, however, charged many consumers for these products without or before having the written authorization necessary to perform the monitoring services. Chase charged customers as soon as they enrolled in these products even if they were not actually receiving the services yet.

The agencies found that Chase engaged in these practices between October 2005, when Chase first offered the products, and June 2012, when Chase stopped billing consumers who were not receiving the promised benefits.

Requirements

Consumers rate Chase Credit Cards

To ensure that Chase honors its obligation to repay all affected consumers and that consumers are no longer subject to these unfair billing practices, the CFPB’s order requires that Chase Bank USA, N.A. and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.:

  • End unfair billing practices:  Consumers will no longer be billed for these products if they are not receiving the promised benefits. Chase also must take steps, subject to the Bureau’s approval, to ensure these unlawful acts do not occur in the future.
  • Complete repayment, plus interest, to more than two million consumers: Chase must pay a full refund, approximately $309 million, to more than two million consumers who enrolled in the credit monitoring product and were charged for services that were not received. In addition to the amount paid for the product, Chase must refund interest and any over-the-limit fees resulting from the charge for the product.
  • Conveniently repay consumers: If the consumers are still Chase customers, they received a credit to their accounts. If they are no longer a Chase credit card holder, they received checks in the mail. Consumers were not required to take any action to receive their credit or check. Most consumers should have received refunds by November 30, 2012.
  • Submit to an independent audit: Chase has engaged an independent auditor to help ensure the refunds have been provided in compliance with the terms as set forth in the CFPB’s order.
  • Improve oversight of third-party vendors: The CFPB is also requiring that Chase strengthen its management of third-party vendors who manage these identity protection products.
  • Pay a $20 million penalty: Chase will make a $20 million penalty payment to the CFPB’s Civil Penalty Fund.

Chase Bank and JPMorgan Chase Bank have been ordered to refund $309 million in illegal credit card charges to more than 2.1 million consumers. The Con...

Article Image

Credit card delinquencies and debt near two-decade lows

Consumers appear to be paying closer attention to the debt they're running up on their plastic.

TransUnion reports the national credit card delinquency rate -- the ratio of borrowers 90 or more days past due -- decreased to 0.57% in the second quarter from 0.63% the same period a year ago. On a quarter-over-quarter basis, credit card delinquencies dropped from 0.69% in the first quarter.

In fact, the credit card delinquency rate ended the second quarter only one basis point from the all-time low of 0.56%, set in the second three months of 1994.

Average credit card debt per borrower remained nearly unchanged over the last year, dropping from $4,971 in a year earlier to $4,965 in this year's second quarter. On a quarterly basis, card debt increased from $4,875 in the first three months of this year.

"Despite recent improvements in the employment situation, consumers continue to value their credit card relationships as a primary means of liquidity. This is best demonstrated by the historically low credit card delinquency rates we observe today," said Ezra Becker, vice president of research and consulting in TransUnion's financial services business unit. "Credit card debt also remains relatively low, and while we did observe a quarterly rise in debt, we would need to see a few more quarters of increases to describe it as a significant trend. Having said that, the data supports that consumers will continue to prioritize their credit card relationships over other credit obligations, and delinquencies should remain low into the near future."

The continuing trend

Since 2000, the average 90-day credit card delinquency rate for the second quarter of the year has been 1.07%. In that same time period, average credit card debt in the second quarter has averaged $5,169.

Only two states -- Indiana and New Hampshire -- saw rises in their delinquency rates year over year, though the magnitudes of the increases were small.

On a more granular level, 74% of metropolitan statistical areas (MSAs) saw declines in their respective delinquency rates in in the second quarter relative to one year ago. This is an improvement over the previous quarter, when 65% of MSAs experienced year-over-year decreases.

Some of the MSAs that experienced the largest year-over-year decreases in this year's second quarter included Seattle (26.5% decline from 0.49% to 0.36%), Denver (21.4% decline from 0.56% to 0.44%) and Minneapolis (21.3% decline from 0.47% to 0.37%).

Looking ahead

Based on current economic assumptions, TransUnion sees credit card delinquencies remaining relatively flat in the third quarter -- closing at about 0.6%. This forecast is based on seasonality effects and various other economic factors such as anticipated gross state product, consumer sentiment, disposable income, and employment conditions.

The forecast changes as the economy deviates from a conservative economic outlook, if there are unanticipated shocks to the economy affecting recovery, or if lenders materially change their underwriting standards.

Consumers appear to be paying closer attention to the debt they're running up on their plastic. TransUnion reports the national credit card delinquency r...

Article Image

PerkStreet goes out of business

It was one of those things that sounded too good to be true but actually turned out to be just as advertised. While it lasted.

PerkStreet Financial, which has been offering a no-fee debit card and checking account, told its customers today that it is going out of business.

However, the company said customers' money is safe and they will continue to be able to access their funds, use their debit cards and write checks through The Bancorp Bank, which has been PerkStreet's servicing institution since PerkStreet arrived on the scene five years ago. Accounts will be automatically converted, the company said.

What won't continue are the perks that gave PerkStreet its name. To encourage customers to use their cards, PerkStreet awarded rebates -- or "perks" -- that could reach 2% of total purchases for customers who maintained a $5,000 balance. In March 2012, the company scaled that back to 1%, saying that not many customers were keeping enough on deposit to hit the 2% threshold anyway.

Instead, it substituted 2% rebates on purchases at select online sites, including Walmart, Target and Amazon. PerkStreet CEO and founder Dan O'Malley said he thought that making 2% rebates more widely available, without requiring a minimum deposit, would benefit more customers.

Rebates? Who cares?

Perhaps, but it could also be that many customers were like me and were so delighted with the free checking and debit card that they didn't bother with the perks. After writing about PerkStreet in December 2011 in a story titled "What if the bank paid you to have an account?" I opened an account to see if PerkStreet was all it claimed to be, vowing to write a withering exposé if it turned out to be just the usual fluff.

I didn't get the exposé but I wound up with a great little checking account and debit card to serve as my slush fund, using it to buy movie tickets, groceries at Trader Joe's and bottles of wine here and there. I also set up automatic payment of a couple of utility bills, condo fees and other annoyances.

Then, with great pleasure, I dropped by the local Wells Fargo branch and closed the personal account that I had maintained there at great expense and with much aggravation. Even though I paid no attention to PerkStreet's rebates, I occasionally got automatic $30 or $40 rebates that simply perked up in my account.

What was best for me was the simple fact that the account was free, whereas the Wells Fargo account had been loaded with fees too numerous to count and constant errors and glitches in trying to manage the account online.

Promoting the debt-free life

Back in 2011, PerkStreet's O'Malley, a former Capital One executive, explained how he dreamed up the idea of a debit card that paid rebates, instead of the much more common rebate-paying credit card.

"I realized the product I was selling was designed to get people into debt," O'Malley said then.  "A majority of families are not going to be able to pay off their credit card debts.  I found it distasteful."

O'Malley vowed to set up a reward program using debit cards, something that would reward consumers who spent only as much money as they had in their account.

It worked great for its customers but not, apparently, as a business.

"Ultimately ... we could not find the financial success required to continue building the business," the company said in an email to its customers. "Over the last 6 months we have been pursuing additional investment to grow our business to the point it could be self-sustaining. Unfortunately, we were unable to secure more funding and now must begin the process of closing the company."

"We started PerkStreet with the seemingly impossible goal of making banking more rewarding for the average person. We were able to give cash back for spending money that was already earned, not risking going into debt by spending on a credit card," the company's statement said. "We believed we could reward everyone, not just the people who would tell you it takes money to make money. The last 5 years were an incredible journey. We've given out over $4 million dollars in perks and done groundbreaking things to create our amazing online community. We are deeply saddened to see it end."

It was one of those things that sounded too good to be true but it was great while it lasted. PerkStreet Financial, which has been offering a no-fee debit ...

Article Image

Credit cards less consumer-friendly in second quarter

Consumers interested in transferring high-interest credit card balances and taking advantage of a 0% introductory rate should act quickly. A study of credit card rates and offers in the second quarter show these deals aren't getting any better.

In its review of the credit card landscape in the second quarter, credit card website CardHub.com found the average 0% introductory rate for balance transfers now remains in effect for 9.94 months. That's down 3.40% from the first quarter.

The average 0% intro rate for new purchases is a bit longer, averaging 10.17 months. CardHub CEO Odysseas Papadimitriou says 0% offers are now as good as they're going to get.

“I think what is important to say here is the 0% offers have peaked and I really think this is the time to take advantage,” he said. “If you have a balance at a high rate, this is the time to go ahead and do a balance transfer.”

Easy way to save money

Transferring to a card with a 0% balance, even for a few months, can save hundreds of dollars and allow consumers to make significant reductions in their account balance. Every dollar of their payment during the introductory period goes to paying down the balance.

Using a credit card calculator, a consumer can devise a budget plan for paying off a credit card balance and get a list of the credit cards with the best 0% transfer offers. 

Overall, the credit card environment was less friendly to consumers in the second quarter. At least, less friendly to some consumers.

“Interest rates for consumers who have good to excellent credit seem to be at a stable level,” Papadimitriou said. “But interest rates for consumers with fair credit or bad credit are trending upward.”

Lack of competition

One reason for that is a lack of competition. There are simply fewer credit card companies willing to issue cards to people with subprime credit.

“With HSBC selling the majority of its portfolio to Capital One, there aren't that many issuers in that space,” Papadimitriou said.

In 2009, in the depths of the credit crisis, ConsumerAffairs received hundreds of complaints from Chase credit card customers when Chase unilaterally closed their accounts. All had been former Washington Mutual customers. Papadimitriou says it's no mystery. Before it got into trouble, Washington Mutual had purchased Providia – at the time a major player in the subprime credit card space.

“At the height of the recession Washington Mutual failed and Chase absorbed it,” he said. “The last thing Chase wanted was to take on the subprime credit customers it inherited.”

Fees

Fees remained mostly stable in the second quarter. The big exception was the cash advance fee. According to the CardHub report, the average cash advance fee is now $10.88 – up 22.11% year-over-year.

The average balance transfer fee during the period was 2.88% of the amount transferred. That's 2.86% higher than last quarter but 3.03% lower than during the second quarter of 2012.

The average foreign transaction fee was 2.22% – the same as it was this time last year.

There was also a new trend in complaints in the second quarter. Complaints about credit reporting errors dropped out of the top three, replaced by a rise in complaints about fraud and identity theft.

Consumers interested in transferring high-interest credit card balances and taking advantage of a 0% introductory rate should act quickly. A study of credi...

Article Image

What to look for in a credit card

What makes a good credit card? Personal finance experts will tell you it all depends on how you plan to use it.

Some cards have annual fees, others don't. Some provide cash back. Others provide rewards points. Some have high interest rates, others have lower rates. You get the picture.

If you are choosing from one of the many card solicitations you have received in recent weeks, it might be wise to first look at the annual fee. Before the 2008 credit crisis, almost no credit card imposed an annual fee. Most still don't but a recent survey from Bankrate.com shows 22% of cash-back cards are now charging an annual fee, up from 18% last year.

The same survey shows that more cards – 55% of the offers – provide some type of bonus for signing up. Even so, the bonuses aren't quite as generous as before and require more spending in order to redeem them.

Get some cash back

More than half the cards in the survey provide 1% cash back on purchases. Almost as many provide higher payout for certain categories of spending. For example, if you need a card to pay for gasoline, choosing a card with the highest cash-back amount for fuel purchases makes the most sense. Other cards may pay more when you charge groceries or restaurant meals.

When considering a rewards card, make sure you check to see how long you have to cash in the rewards. Sixty-five percent of the cards in the survey don't have expiration dates on their rewards, about the same number as last year.

"As long as you pay your balance in full every month, a rewards card is a good way to get some of that money back," said Greg McBride, Bankrate.com's senior financial analyst. "Make sure to find the card that offers the best fit for your lifestyle.”

For some, a low rate is important

If you pay off your balance every month – and you should – the interest rate might not be that important. But if you carry a balance, a low rate will save you money each month.

Some credit cards give you a low introductory rate for new large purchases. Obviously, the lower the rate and the longer the introductory period, the better.

The lowest rate, of course, is 0%. Fortunately there are several cards that offer an introductory 0% rate on new purchases. You should choose from one of those before considering a card that actually charges interest – even low interest – for the first six months.

Compare fees

With interest rates going up, credit card companies may adjust, not only their rates but their fees as well. Odysseas Papadimitriou, CEO of Card Hub, a credit card comparison website, says consumers need to look carefully at all fees associated with a credit card.

“The things that consumers care about and look at, like transaction fees, are going down,” he said in a recent interview. “The things that consumers are not paying attention to, like cash advance fees, are going up. When most people apply for a credit card, they don't expect to use it for a cash advance.”

Checking out fees is especially important if you are selecting a card designed to help you rebuild a damaged credit profile. All too often the cards in this category have the worst terms for consumers.

What not to do

The worst way to select a credit card is not to simply select one of the many advertising mailers that land in your mailbox. The best strategy is to think about what you want from a credit card and compare as many options in that category as possible.

Make sure the research material you consult about a particular credit card is up to date, since credit card companies change fees, interest rates and terms and conditions from time to time.

What makes a good credit card? Personal finance experts will tell you it all depends on how you plan to use it.Some cards have annual fees, others don't....

Article Image

Pre-paid cards: it's not just the fees

Pre-paid debit cards have always had a bad reputation with consumer advocates who have complained about their numerous and high fees. These cards can be expensive to use.

But when you ask the consumers who use them, they rarely mention the fees. Perhaps at this point they have become resigned to the cost of using these banking alternatives. But that doesn't mean they don't have complaints. Far from it.

Pre-paid card users posting on ConsumerAffairs often complain about poor customer service and policies that suddenly block them from accessing their money. In fact, it's a constant refrain.

Rhonda, of Janesville, Minn., complains that her Green Dot card was blocked after she spent hours in the emergency room, waiting for her mother to receive treatment.

Excessive use

Consumers rate Green Dot Prepaid Cards

“While I was sitting in the ER for hours, I started playing games on my phone and buying coins,” she wrote in a ConsumerAffairs post. “After a few hours of playing, my card was blocked and the account was closed for excessive use.”

The problem, however, was Rhonda still had money on her card that she was no longer able to access.

“It took me from May 15 until June 20 to get refunded with the $300 I had on my card,” she wrote. “From now on I will never use a Green Dot card.”

Another big complaint about all pre-paid cards is customer service. When things go wrong with the card – and they do – consumers complain it's very hard to get help straightening it out. Peter, of Buxton, Me., says he purchased a Green Dot card for $80 and went home to activate it online.

“After completing the information form and selections on the first page I found it would not 'continue' when I pressed the button-link,” Peter writes.

No humans available

When Peter called the customer service number, he hit a dead end.

“There are no options to speak to a customer service representative and any pertinent options require you already be in their system, which is why I was calling them in the first place.” he writes. “I finally got someone in the 'lost and stolen card department' who could not help me and only inform me that it was now three minutes past customer service quitting time.”

Consumers rate Netspend

Matthew, from Pennsylvania, got his 2012 federal tax refund from TurboTax on a Netspend card. He writes that after he purchased a PlayStation 3, Netspend blocked his account, saying the expensive purchase triggered a fraud alert.

One reason pre-paid card companies say they are quick to freeze accounts is to prevent fraud, which can be a problem with any financial instrument. But despite these security measures, Toni, of Colorado Springs, Colo., said she discovered someone was draining money from her Netspend card. In a panic, she called the customer service number.

Time is money

“While on hold with NetSpend for a total of almost 45 minutes, waiting to speak to a live representative, every last dollar was spent, down to the last penny I had to my name,” Toni writes. “I was hysterical, as you can imagine, and all they did was transfer me to another person, then another, then another. After over three hours on the phone with several different representatives and a mix of misguided information that went against what the last person told me, I still had no answers as to who, how and when my money would be returned. It’s been seven days.”

Even the Bluebird card from American Express, which generally gets the highest marks among pre-paid cards, can be problematic for some consumers. Maria, of Corona, Calif., writes that she purchased a card for her husband, a truck driver, but something triggered a loss-prevention lock, making the card unusable by her husband, who was already on the road.

“He called American Express the next day, waiting one hour and fifteen minutes, but they did not resolve the problem,” Maria wrote. “They said I need to get another card in order to transfer money to him. I went to Walmart, bought another card, registered and started to transfer money to his card everything was okay. My statement said I transfered money to his account. I called him and he said the card is locked again and has already spent two days with no food.”

The unbanked

For Maria, Rhonda and many others, pre-paid debit cards are about their only option for managing money in an account since they are unable, or can't afford, to open bank accounts. In recent years, monthly bank fees and service charges have priced millions out of the banking system.

In 2011 the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) estimated 10 million households in the U.S. – or 8.2% – had no bank accounts. The report found that the highest “unbanked” and “underbanked” rates are found among non-Asian minorities, lower-income households, younger households, and unemployed households. Close to half of all households in these groups are unbanked or underbanked compared to slightly more than one-quarter of all households.

Pre-paid debit cards have always had a bad reputation with consumer advocates who have complained about their numerous and high fees. These cards can be ex...

Article Image

Supreme Court upholds American Express arbitration agreement

A decision handed down by the U.S. Supreme Court on Thursday marked another blow to class action lawsuits -- and the consumers who bring them.

The Court’s ruling in American Express v. Italian Colors Restaurant continued a recent pattern by the Court of upholding arbitration provisions, even when lower courts found them unfair or otherwise invalid.

The case concerned a clause in a contract between American Express and retail merchants prohibiting the merchants from bringing class-action arbitration cases. Instead, the contract required each merchant to bring its own individual arbitration claim. Despite the provision, lower courts had allowed class actions to proceed on the ground that the merchants couldn’t afford to bring their own individual actions.

In a 5-3 ruling, the Court dismissed those concerns, writing that the Federal Arbitration Act “does not permit courts to invalidate a contractual waiver of class arbitration on the ground that the plaintiff’s cost of individually arbitrating a federal statutory claim exceeds the potential recovery.”

The Act, which dates back to 1925, affirmatively requires that parties who have agreed to arbitration honor that agreement rather than taking their complaints to a traditional court.

Arbitration “a matter of contract”

The Court’s opinion, written by Justice Antonin Scalia, said that the Act “reflects the overarching principle that arbitration is a matter of contract. … And consistent with that text, courts must ‘rigorously enforce’ arbitration agreements according to their terms.”

Justice Elena Kagan wrote a blistering dissent, in which Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Stephen Breyer joined.

Kagan wrote that “if the arbitration clause is enforceable, Amex has insulated itself from antitrust liability — even if it has in fact violated the law. The monopolist gets to use its monopoly power to insist on a contract effectively depriving its victims of all legal recourse.”

“And here is the nutshell version of today’s opinion, admirably flaunted rather than camouflaged: Too darn bad.”

Another Supreme blow to class actions

The opinion is just the latest in a series of blows that the Supreme Court has issued to the class action as a form of dispute resolution. In 2011, the Court upheld a provision in AT&T’s contracts requiring consumers to submit to individual arbitration.  That provision, like the one in American Express, had been waived by lower courts due to its bar on class actions.

That decision was so sweeping that it prompted law professor Brian Fitzpatrick to tell the ABA Journal that it could "end class-action litigaiton as we know it."

And in 2011, the Supreme Court threw out a high-profile employment discrimination lawsuit against retail giant Wal-Mart, ruling that the case did not meet the requirement that a class action involve “questions of law or fact common to the class.”

A decision handed down by the U.S. Supreme Court on Thursday marked another blow to class action lawsuits -- and the consumers who bring them....

Article Image

No end in sight as "swipe fee" fight rages on

The fight over "swipe fees" charged to merchants who accept Visa and MasterCard is going into extra rounds. Nineteen large companies have opted out of a proposed settlement that would have ended a long-running class-action case.

Retailers say they pay the highest fees in the world to credit card companies and banks to swipe their cards because of unfair price-fixing within the industry.

Walmart, Costco, Starbucks and Gap are among the large retailers rejecting the settlement, saying it would not stop swipe fees from rising but would block them from challenging future increase.

"If this settlement is approved, it would allow credit-card companies and big banks to perpetuate an unfair and broken system that costs all consumers, including those who don't even have a credit or debit card," Mike Cook, senior vice president of finance and assistant treasurer for Wal-Mart, said.

The National Retail Federation is also expected to opt out of the settlement this week while the retailers say they are considering  "additional legal action to recover damages from Visa and MasterCard under U.S. antitrust laws."

Europeans crack down

Another retailers' group charged that Visa has offered to reduce its credit card swipe fees on certain transactions in Europe while it "continues to stiff U.S. merchants with soaring fees that have tripled during the past decade."

"Here at home, U.S. merchants and consumers are struggling under the weight of swipe fees up to ten times higher than what Visa Europe is proposing for European transactions," the Merchants Payments Coalition said.  "Credit card swipe fees in the U.S. are up to 4 percent of the transaction value, while the new Visa rate in the EU will be 0.3 percent."

“European regulators are holding Visa’s feet to the fire for their outrageous swipe fees – even though the fees in Europe are a tiny fraction of what they are in the United States,” said Doug Kantor, counsel of the Merchants Payments Coalition. “There is no reason for rates to be as high as they are.  This should be a wake-up call that credit card swipe fee reform is long overdue here.”

Judge John Gleeson of U.S. District Court in Brooklyn granted preliminary approval to the class-action settlement last November and there is a deadline this week for parties wanting to opt out of the settlement. A hearing on final approval is scheduled for Sept. 12. 

MasterCard says it's confident the judge will approve the settlement, the Wall Street Journal reported. Visa did not comment.

A spokesman for the Electronic Payments Coalition, which represents the credit card companies and large banks, said the retailers did not raise any new arguments in their opt-out announcement.

The fight over "swipe fees" charged to merchants who accept Visa and MasterCard is going into extra rounds. Nineteen large companies have opted out of a pr...

Article Image

Starting over after bankruptcy

Since the Great Recession millions of Americans have found themselves in dire financial straits. While filing bankruptcy is often the last resort, many have been left with no other choice.

Bankruptcy can be a devastating move, both financially and psychologically. You are unable to borrow money or use a credit card. Your credit score may be lower than your age. But there is life after bankruptcy.

Once your bankruptcy has been discharged by a court you are able to begin rebuilding your financial life, and you should waste no time in doing so. A first step is to establish, or re-establish, a bank relationship.

Checking and savings accounts

Choose a local bank or credit union and open a checking and savings account, just as soon as you have money to deposit in them. Be sure to compare fees and talk to friends and family members about banks they use.

Next, get a secured credit card. You'll have to put some money in an account to secure your purchases. In that way it works much like a debit card. The difference is the bank reports your payments to the credit bureaus -- that helps raise your credit score.

Apply for a gasoline credit card or a department store charge card. After you've used your secured credit card for a few months, it shouldn't be a problem. When you make a purchase with the card, be sure to pay off the entire balance the following month.

Pay your bills on time

Make sure you pay your bills on time. This is one of the biggest contributors to a good credit score and it costs you nothing. All you have to do is be organized and don't buy anything you can't pay for at the end of the month.

Pull your credit reports and dispute any incorrect information you find on them. After filing bankruptcy, there may be some erroneous or out of date data.

Mindy, of Beaverton, Mich., says her Chapter 7 bankruptcy discharge order was dated December 2011 but months later, TransUnion still didn't have it in her credit report.

"While Experian and Equifax are raising my credit scores due to paid off 'credit rebuilding' unsecured loans and charged off accounts due to the correctly reported bankruptcy discharge, TransUnion is reporting a Chapter 13 ongoing bankruptcy, delinquent accounts and claims the federal government never reported the Chapter 7 Bankruptcy discharge to them," Mindy wrote in a ConsumerAffairs post. "Odd, considering the other two agencies seemed to receive it just fine and dandy."

Buying a home

When you can, start building a small savings account. You'll need to adopt budget discipline and be very careful with your money. It won't be long before you'll even be able to think about purchasing a home.

According to the National Association of Realtors (NAR), 24 months after your bankruptcy has been discharged is the ideal time to apply for a mortgage. By then, if you have worked to re-establish your credit, you may be able to secure a loan at a competitive interest rate. A lower interest rates means a lower monthly payment so it pays to wait until you can get a better rate.

As you begin the process of financial recovery it may be useful to honestly examine what led you into bankruptcy in the first place. For some it was an unforeseen medical emergency that hit them with massive hospital bills. But if your bankruptcy stemmed from years of acquiring unmanageable debt, consider adopting a disciplined budget process as your first step toward restoring financial health.

That doesn't mean giving up all sources of credit. In fact, you'll need to acquire credit as part of the process of rebuilding your credit score.

It just means using credit differently than you did in the past and not letting balances accumulate. With some work, planning and patience, there is financial life after bankruptcy.

Since the Great Recession millions of Americans have found themselves in dire financial straits. While filing bankruptcy is often the last resort, many hav...

Article Image

Consumers are finding good alternatives to banks

Four years ago, when banks were in the midst of the Great Recession, many of them changed the way they do business. The result was not so good for consumers.

Checking accounts cost more and were harder for some consumers to get. There were more fees, higher fees and higher minimum balance requirements. The message to consumers seemed to be, “see if you can find an alternative.”

With so many consumers in play, the market has responded with alternatives to checking accounts, mobile banking and loans. Today there are, in fact, alterntives to doing business with a bank. The main alternative to a checking account to emerge in the last few years is the prepaid debit card.

“They can be good for people who have trouble keeping their spending in check, said Lisa Gerstner, who covers banking issues for Kiplinger. “Usually you can't overdraw your prepaid card. There's also a lot to watch out for with prepaid cards.”

Watch out for fees

The main thing to watch out for is fees. Some prepaid cards, especially the ones that have been around a long time, are really heavy on fees. There's a monthly service charge and fees for different types of transactions.

But some of the newer cards are more consumer-friendly with fewer and lower fees, making them an attractive alternative to a bank. Gerstner recommends the Bluebird Card from American Express and Walmart.

“It's low on fees,” she said. “You can do a lot with it, like direct deposit your paycheck, pay bills on line, things like that.”

In spite of their fees, prepaid cards pioneered some consumer-friendly features that banks ignored until recently. For example, if you made a debit card purchase that overdrew your account, the bank would let the purchase go through, then assess you a $30 fee for the overdraft. It wasn't uncommon for consumers to pile up $150 in overdraft fees on a single shopping trip.

Nice features

Most prepaid cards have always had a policy of denying the transaction if you had insufficient funds on the card. Some even send the user an email after every purchase, showing the new balance on the card. And the Bluebird Card recently added the same FDIC protection banks provide. The secret to prepaid cards is to research how each card works and total up the fees.

“You should definitely look at the fees and find a card that's good for you,” Gerstner said. It's probably best to do that online, rather than buying a card off the rack in a store.

More people prefer to manage their financial services on the go and a savvy bank, Bancorp Bank, is taking full advantage with its Simple service. Simple is a smartphone app in which the bank remains mostly invisible. You get a debit card, direct deposit and the other trappings of a bank account, but aren't saddled with monthly service and overdraft fees.

Anti-bank sentiment

“I think they're really trying to tap into this anti-bank sentiment that's going on,” Gerstner said. “They make a point that they're really light on fees. People who are mobile and really tech savvy are more likely to be interested.”

Since the banking crisis of 2009 banks have been less likely to lend money. That's led to the creation of several peer-to-peer lending sites that match up creditworthy borrowers with people looking for a good return on their investment.

Lending Club is one such site. Borrowers can get money for three to five years at rates below seven percent. Prosper.com operates on a similar business model.

“They're interesting on both sides of the equation because, as a borrower you go there to see if you can get credit,” Gerstner said. “I talked to two or three people who were able to get loans from these sites and they had stories about how they were able to get a better rate or get credit they couldn't have gotten from a bank.”

Win-win

On the other hand, people who are starved for yield on their money are looking at investing in those loans and sometimes getting returns in the double-digits. It can often be a win-win proposition.

Do banks care that they are losing business to these upstart alternatives? Some may but others might not. And Gerstner says consumers shouldn't give up on banks entirely.

“I don't think banks are going away and you can still find good deals if you'll willing to look at more local and Internet options,” she said.

But it's nice to know there are starting to be some alternatives.  

Four years ago, when banks were in the midst of the Great Recession, many ofthem changed the way they do business. The result was not so good for consumers...

Article Image

Prepaid calling card marketer banned from using deceptive tactics

A marketer of pre-paid phone calling cards accused of short-changing its customers is being barred from making deceptive claims.

The company, DR Phone Communications, markets and sells prepaid calling cards in grocery and convenience stores, and at kiosks in other retail establishments. The cards are especially popular with members of immigrant communities, many of whom depend on prepaid cards to stay in touch with family overseas.

Testing the product

According to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) , the company delivered substantially less than promised in its marketing, advertising and promotions. The agency bought samples of the defendants’ cards in September 2010 and November 2011, and of the 169 card tested, all failed to deliver the number of minutes prominently advertised on their point-of-sale posters.

In all, the FTC complaint says, the defendants' cards delivered on average only 40 percent of the minutes promised, with 52 cards delivering less than 25 percent of the minutes advertised, and 25 cards delivering less than five percent of the minutes advertised.

Based on these results, the FTC charged the defendants with violating the FTC Act by misrepresenting the number of calling minutes the cards would provide, and failing to disclose adequately fees that would reduce the cards’ value, and in turn the number of calling minutes they provide.

What to do

Thinking about buying a pre-paid phone card. Here are some tips from the FTC.

A marketer of pre-paid phone calling cards accused of short-changing its customers is being barred from making deceptive claims. The company, DR Phone Com...

Article Image

Some credit cards may help pay for summer travel

When you're planning a summer vacation, it's important to make out a budget. Too many consumers fail to plan their spending and, when they return, are faced with more debt.

But having the right credit card can help. It can help you not only save money, but actually get some money back.

Odysseas Papadimitriou, CEO of CardHub, breaks down summer travel cards into three categories; those that have good initial reward bonuses, those that have good ongoing rewards programs and those that have the best 0% financing offers. The right card can add up to actual money.

“Consumers, by signing up for the right offer, can get $400 statement credit or $500 toward travel expenses by spending what they would normally spend on their credit card during the first three months,” Papadimitriou said.

Real money

Consumers rate Chase Credit Cards

Take the Chase Sapphire Preferred Card, for example. By spending at least $3,000 during the first three months your account is open will give you a 40,000-point rewards bonus, which can be redeemed for $500 in travel accommodations booked through Chase’s Ultimate Rewards program or a $400 statement credit.

That's right. Instead of stockpiling those airline miles that you never seem to be able to use, you can trade them in for cash.

“It doesn't get much better than that,” Papadimitriou said.

The Chase Sapphire card does not charge an annual fee the first year but there's a $95 fee each year after that.

Another solid choice is the Barclaycard Arrival World MasterCard. Spend just $1,000 during the first 90 days to claim the card’s 40,000-mile rewards bonus, which is redeemable for a $400 statement credit you can use to pay any travel-related charge. It also waives its $89 annual fee the first year.

Hilton HHonors Surpass Credit Card and the Club Carlson Premier Rewards Card also provide general upfront bonuses. With the latter you get 50,000 bonus points with your first purchase and 35,000 additional points for spending at least $2,500 within 90 days. Those 85,000 points can get you up to 18 free hotel nights, depending on the category of hotel you select and the number of consecutive nights you book.

Long-term value

Consumers rate Capital One

Other cards, like the Capital OneVenture Card, can provide long-term value. It offers the miles equivalent of 2% cash back across all purchases as long as you redeem them for travel-related purchases.

Also in that category, the Blue Cash Preferred from American Express offers 6% cash back on groceries, 3% on gas and department store purchases, and 1% on everything else, making it a great card for everyday spending as well as road trips. It carries a $75 annual fee but you get a $150 initial rewards bonus for spending at least $1,000 during the first three months.

If you think that you might need several months to pay for your summer vacation, putting everything on a 0% interest card might save some money. Among the most attractive cards in this category, Papadimitriou says, is the Slate Card from Chase. Transferring existing debt to this card before using it to pay for your trip offers two distinct advantages. There's no balance transfer fee and it comes with a 15-month interest-free introductory period.

“I’m a big fan of the Island Approach, which entails using a different credit card for different types of transactions in order to amass the best possible collection of terms, but that’s certainly not for everyone,” Papadimitriou said. “Many consumers instead value the simplicity of having a single credit card in their wallets. But if you go that route, getting the right card for your needs becomes even more important. In other words, you should only get a rewards card if you always pay your bill in full and a travel rewards card if you embark on numerous trips each year.”

Another bit of advice if you are traveling outside the U.S. Papadimitriou says always pay your bill in the native currency. Most foreign businesses will let you pay for credit card purchases in dollars, but usually charge a fee to do the conversion.

When you're planning a summer vacation, it's important to make out a budget. Too many consumers fail to plan their spending and, when they return, are face...

Article Image

Stay-at-home spouses to get credit card application break

Spouses or partners who do not work outside the home may soon have an easier time qualifying for credit cards.

An amendment proposed by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) would let credit card issuers consider income that a stay-at-home applicant, who is 21 or older, shares with a spouse or partner.

“Stay-at-home spouses or partners who have access to resources that allow them to make payments on a credit card can now get their own cards,” said CFPB Director Richard Cordray. He called the new rule “an example of the Bureau’s commitment to working with consumers and financial institutions in order to ensure responsible access to credit for American families.”

Changing the CARD Act

The Credit Card Accountability Responsibility and Disclosure Act (CARD Act), which became law in 2009, requires that card issuers evaluate a consumer’s ability to pay before opening a new credit card account or increasing a credit limit. Under current regulations, a card issuer generally may only consider the individual card applicant’s independent income or assets.

Those in the industry have provided information suggesting that otherwise credit-worthy individuals have been declined for credit card accounts, even though they have the ability to manage the debt. According to the data, a significant number of these individuals may be stay-at-home spouses or partners with access to income from an employed spouse or partner.

The revision allows card issuers to consider third-party income if the applicant, who is 21 or older. has a reasonable expectation of access to it. Although the new rule applies to all such applicants regardless of marital status, the CFPB expects it will ease access to credit particularly for stay-at-home spouses or partners who have access to a working spouse or partner’s income.

According to data from the U.S Census Bureau, more than 16 million married people do not work outside the home. That equates to approximately one out of every three married couples who now may have easier access to credit cards as a result of the amendment.

Spouses or partners who do not work outside the home may soon have an easier time qualifying for credit cards. An amendment proposed by the Consumer Fina...

Article Image

Credit cards are cheaper if you have good credit

As the economy continued to slowly improve in the first quarter of 2013, some consumers found credit a little cheaper. On the other hand, others didn't.

“The interesting thing that jumped out at me was interest rates for people with good credit went down but rates for people with poor credit went up,” said Odysseas Papadimitriou, CEO of Card Hub, which conducts a quarterly analysis of credit card rates.

The average interest rate for people with good credit was 12.79%, down 1.69% from the fourth quarter of 2012. But rates for people with average or below-average credit were up anywhere from 1.7% to 3.0%. Those in the subprime category are paying more to carry a credit card balance.

Competition for good credit customers

“I think its because of the lack of competition in that space, especially coming out of the great recession,” Papadimitriou said. “Some credit card companies got burned by lending in that space so there's not much competition.”

Some lenders have simply stopped issuing subprime cards. Two that still were have joined forces. Capital One's acquisition of HSBC has created what Papadimitriou calls a “competition vacuum” at the lower end of the credit card spectrum. That allows companies still in the space to raise rates at will.

Instead, the real competition is for consumers with good credit, and more consumers fit into this category than you might think. According to Papadimitriou, about 50% of credit card holders fall into that group. Credit card companies are willing to compete, and offer some attractive perks, to reach these consumers.

Longer periods for 0% interest

For example, the average 0% introductory rate for balance transfers now remains in effect for 10.29 months, 2.39% longer than the previous quarter. The 0% rate for new purchases now remains in effect for about the same period, also an increase over the previous quarter.

Rewards perks also rose for credit card customers with good credit. At $76.81, the average cash back initial rewards bonus is 15.4% more valuable than last quarter and 33.77% more valuable than this time last year. The average points/miles initial rewards bonus is 10.74% higher than last quarter and 13.89% higher than this time last year.

Consumers with good credit also benefited when it comes to fees. Foreign transaction fees, which averaged 2.24% in the first quarter, were down a fraction from the previous quarter but 5.88% from a year ago. Balance transfer fees were unchanged but cash advance fees – mostly affecting subprime borrowers – were up 23.02% from the previous quarter.

“The things consumers care about and look at closely are going down, things like transaction fees," Papadimitriou said. “The things that consumers are not paying attention to, like cash advance fees – they're going up. Most people, when they sign up for a credit card, don't expect to use it for a cash advance, so they don't care what the fee is. But when they need a cash advance, it's too late.”

Complaints

Papadimitriou also analyzed credit card complaints filed with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. There appeared to be one overriding concern.

“Billing continues to be the number one type of complaint,” Papadimitriou said. “People are complaining about past due fees, finance charges, a payment not posting on time. It's almost a quarter of all complaints.”

There were also a lot of consumer complaints about erroneous items on credit reports and debt collection practices.

What to do

Papadimitriou suggests consumers take full advantage of credit card companies' competition for good credit customers by enrolling in rewards programs, where available. Rewards are getting better, he says, especially for initial bonuses.

As the economy continued to slowly improve in the first quarter of 2013, some consumers found credit a little cheaper. On the other hand, others didn't.&...

Article Image

Vanilla Visa Gift Card not always so sweet

It's a long way from Noblesville, Ind., to California so when Jeff's daughter set off on a road trip, he fixed her up with a Vanilla Visa Gift Card to help pay for food and gas. But so far, the trip has been anything but smooth, he said in a complaint filed today.

"Purchased a $200 card for my daughter for her move to California. The card continually is turned down at gas stations - which was the main reason for its purchase," Jeff said. "When I called the company, I was told that she needed to use it at the pump,  not go into an attendant. So she slid her card at the pump and it said denied. She then went to the attendant - and he denied it too."

"I called the company and they said that even though it was denied, when she swiped it at the pump it automatically put a hold on her entire balance of $104 - so she is now out of money," Jeff said.

The question of whether to use the card at the pump or to take it inside is one that pops up frequently, and the advice Jeff got seems to contradict an instructional video on the Vanilla Visa site:

Jeff said he had spoken with four different people and been assured numerous times that the money would soon be available but so far without success, leaving his daughter stranded with no money for gas or food.

Others have similar problems

Although it's no consolation, Jeff and his daughter are far from the only consumers who've been disappointed with the Vanilla Visa card.

Consumers rate Vanilla Visa Gift Card

"My boss gave me two Vanilla Visa cards, one in the amount of $250 and another one in the amount of $150 for Christmas gifts (I work for a law firm). He gave the same thing to the other employees," said Claire of Markham, Ontario. "All the cards, when we went to purchase, had $0 balance."

Claire said it took hours of calls to customer service to extract a promise that the problem would be taken care of in ten days, which wasn't a total satisfactory answer.

"Really, this is a problem that shouldn't take 10 days. It's fraud of taking people's money and keeping it for 10 business days," she said. What perhaps makes it even more irksome is that Claire is not alone.

"The same thing happened when my brother purchased one recently and they said the same thing," she said. "He got it for my dad's birthday and now, we have to wait 12 days. This is absolutely ridiculous and, when you call the Customer Service, they keep apologizing? What's apologizing going to do for me?"

Claire is not the only consumer to report multiple cards being declined. It's a common complaint with the Vanilla Visa, for some reason.  

"I purchased three $25 Vanilla Visa cards at CVS Pharmacy to give to my parents. They were all declined," said Greita of Talladega, Ala. "Since I had charged them to my Chase Visa card, I contacted them. They are now trying to put all the blame on CVS. I have received a temporary credit on my account but their representative says that if CVS doesn't pay Visa back, I will have to pay."

What to do

How can you avoid similar problems? Perhaps the best advice is to stay away from gift cards issued by banks and credit card companies. They charge higher fees and users tend to have more problems, according to a recent survey. It's better to stick with cards issued by a store or restaurant chain.

Consumers like Jeff may want to buy a gift card issued on behalf of a chain of gas stations, although this can get tricky, since not all companies operate in every state. One site we found that issues gas gift cards is SVMCards.com.

Read more about gift cards

It's a long way from Noblesville, Ind., to California so when Jeff's daughter set off on a road trip, he fixed her up with a Vanilla Visa Gift Card to help...

Article Image

Understanding credit can help you avoid costly mistakes

How do you use credit? There are right ways and wrong ways, and the latter almost always lands you in trouble.

Consumer credit as we know it has evolved fairly quickly in the last four decades. Before the late 1970s few people had credit cards. Even if they had a Mastercard or Visa – it used to be called BankAmericard – they rarely had more than one.

Over the years, having credit cards allowed consumers to expand their purchasing power, sometimes buying things they really couldn't afford. But it stimulated the economy and generated income for the banks so everyone was happy.

End of the party

Eventually it caught up with us. The credit crisis of 2008 was about more than mortgages. In its aftermath credit card companies reduced customers' credit lines and in some cases, unilaterally closed accounts.

Even now, more than four years later, we're still left with a significant credit balance. Combining credit statistics from a number of federal agencies, NextAdvisor.com, a financial research site, came up with the top credit mistakes that consumers make.

For example, the company cites Federal Reserve data showing consumers carry more than $793 billion in credit card debt. That debt is borne by the 46% of credit card holders who don't pay off their full balance each month.

“If you're not paying your credit card balance each month, you're paying interest in addition to the principal your owe,” said Jeff Hindenach, director of content for NextAdvisor. “I think the most shocking statistic is the $22.5 billion in credit card penalty fees. That's people paying their credit card bill late or going over their credit limit. These are penalties that no one should have to pay.”

Blissfully unaware

Not only that, 36% of consumers are unaware of the interest rate on their credit cards. Maybe knowing the rate isn't very important if you pay the balance down to zero each month, but if you carry a balance, it's information you really need to know.

“If you don't know what interest rate you're paying and its 22%, then you're paying a lot more interest than you should be paying,” Hindenach said. “There are balance transfer cards out there that can save a lot of money but you have to be aware of your interest rate in order to take advantage of them.”

A recent Federal Trade Commission (FTC) study showed that 42 million consumers have errors on their credit reports that they do not know about. Hindenach says it's just more evidence that consumers are not always aware of the credit mistakes they are making.

Credit report errors

“Errors in your credit report will obviously lower your credit score and a lower credit score can often times mean a higher interest rate,” he said. “If your credit score dips low enough you could have problems getting credit cards, getting loans, getting a mortgage.”

To make sure the information in your credit file is accurate, you should go to www.annualcreditreport.com, a site sanctioned by the U.S. government, and download your credit reports, at no charge, from all three credit reporting agencies – Experian, Equifax and TransUnion. If you find inaccurate information, go to the website for the agency containing the errors and look for instructions for disputing the information and seeking a correction.

“After you file that paperwork, which is actually like a letter, they have 30 days to respond,” Hindenach said. “Resolution is fairly quick.”

Not always wise to close credit accounts

When examining your credit report you may see a number of credit accounts you are not using. But don't close them. Sometimes, doing that can negatively impact your credit score.

Instead, if you make a couple of small purchases each year on a little-used credit card and pay off the balance immediately, it will boost your credit score. Carrying a credit card balance, especially a large one, not only limits your purchasing power but can lower your credit score over time.

“It would be great if schools started having some sort of financial literacy class for students,” Hindenach said. Something we advocate is parents talking to their kids about credit at an early age.”

Then again, a lot of parents will probably need to educate themselves about credit and break some bad habits too.

How do you use credit? There are right ways and wrong ways, and the latter almost always lands you in trouble.Consumer credit as we know it has evolved f...

Article Image

Credit card balance transfers can save you money

Many consumers struggle with credit card debt. If you have three or four cards that carry balances, you are looking at three or four minimum payments each month, often at high rates of interest.

Getting those multiple balances consolidated on one low-interest, or even 0% interest card can save money and help monthly cash flow. But consumers often encounter frustration when trying to find just the right card.

Alicia, of Little Falls, N.J., said she tried to transfer her balances to a Citibank card but was unprepared for what she considers an invasive application process.

“The male I spoke with was asking me too many personal questions about my finances and how I was paying my bills,” Alicia wrote in a ConsumerAffairs post. “I told him it was none of your business and my bills do get paid on time. He told me he could not do the balance transfer without updating personal info.”

Tougher application process

After a prolonged standoff, Alicia said Citibank simply closed her account. The lesson here is that banks are much more thorough in the application process in this new age of credit.

Consumers rate Chase Credit Cards

Anne, of Bozeman, Mont., said she used a 0% balance transfer check from Chase to pay off an account from another bank. But the transfer, she says, hasn't gone smoothly.

“Since then I have had to contact Chase each month to have interest fees explained and reversed,” she writes. “Each month the fees have been reversed, with the representatives not being able to explain why the interest was charged. Today I spoke with a representative who refused to reverse interest fees and in her defense she provided an explanation that directly contradicts what is printed on the back of the credit card statement.”

Disconnect

Doris, of Aiken, S.C., says she accepted a Discover balance transfer but found either she misunderstood the terms or the company did.

“They tacked on another $40 surcharge every month (not in Terms) and immediately raised my minimum payment percentage,” Doris wrote. “I am 75 and have only SS for income. It threw my budget off so I couldn't buy food, and then they started calling me accusing me of 'spending too much for my income.' They cut my available balance in half so I'd be over the limit, added huge penalties, and started a domino effect on my former 805 FICO that ruined my financial security.”

Doris' mistake was continuing to use the card with the transferred balance for new purchases. When transferring a balance, you should have a second card to use for day-to-day expenses. Understanding how balance transfers are supposed to work is key to saving money with them.

The best balance transfer cards

Consumers rate Capital One

Card Hub, a credit card comparison site, has conducted a balance transfer study compares the balance transfer policies of each major credit card issuer and identifies the best balance credit cards on the market. The study found that six of the 11 issuers surveyed – Barclaycard US, Capital One, Pentagon Federal Credit Union, USAA, U.S. Bank, and Wells Fargo – allow you to transfer most common types of consumer debt, including mortgages, auto loans, small business loans, and student loans.

Discover also accepts balance transfers from auto loans and medical expenses, but not mortgages, small business loans, personal loans, student loans, HELOCs, or payday loans. Out of the offers from the 11 major issuers included in this study, the three best balance transfer credit cards on the market are:

  • Chase's Slate Card
  • Pentagon Federal Credit Union’s Platinum Rewards Card
  • Discover’s it Card

“While there are a number of interesting conclusions you can glean from an examination of the balance transfer credit card landscape, perhaps the most significant remains the existence of free balance transfer credit cards,” said Card Hub CEO Odysseas Papadimitriou, a personal finance expert who previously served as a senior director at Capital One.

“The Slate Card from Chase boasts the best balance transfer terms by far, offering qualified consumers 0% on transferred debt for the first 15 months without charging either a balance transfer fee or an annual fee," Papadimitriou said. "In other words, it enables you to effectively eliminate your current interest rate for free. For the average consumer with a $6,700 credit card balance, that’s worth up to $1,000 in fees and finance charges that you no longer have to pay.”

Powerful tool

Papadimitriou says using a balance transfer to consolidate small balances on car and student loans can be a very powerful tool if used strategically. Not only does this type of transfer offer a pathway to a lower interest rate, but it also enables you to effectively transform secured debt into unsecured debt.

While an auto loan is guaranteed by the value of the vehicle it’s used to purchase – meaning the lender could repossess your car if you don’t pay as agreed – credit cards aren’t backed by any such physical property. Transferring the last little bit of an auto loan to a credit card will also get you the title sooner.

“With that said, you need to proceed with caution when contemplating transferring a non-credit card balance and make especially sure that you will be able to pay off your balance within the low-interest introductory period,” Papadimitriou said.

Regardless of which balance transfer card you select, make sure you understand the terms. If you are unclear on any points, ask a customer service representative before you execute the transfer.

Also, don’t fall into the common trap of only focusing on the introductory interest rate and term. Not only might the balance transfer fee increase your overall costs significantly, but regular rates could also quickly rob you of any savings if you aren’t able to pay off your full balance by the time regular rates take effect.

Many consumers struggle with credit card debt. If you have three or four cards that carry balances, you are looking at three or four minimum payments each...

Article Image

Consumers leery of financial regulations when confronted with costs

The clock is ticking on the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau's (CFPB) 60-day comment period to gather consumer input about the effects of the 2009 CARD act, which ushered in a number of credit card reforms. The comment period expires February 19, 2013.

The agency is trying to determine how the law has affected consumers and the credit card industry. The CFPB said its earlier research found that the CARD Act had largely curtailed the long-standing practice of hiking interest rates on existing cardholder accounts—prior to the CARD Act, credit card companies often raised customers’ interest rates with little or no advance warning. The agency also said it found that the CARD Act had substantially reduced consumer late fees and nearly eliminated over-limit fees.

“The CARD Act made major changes in the credit card marketplace in order to better protect consumers,” said CFPB Director Richard Cordray, announcing the comment period in December. “The Bureau is seeking to understand how the credit card market is working in practice and how the CARD Act changes have affected consumers and credit card issuers.”

What consumers say

When credit card comparison site CreditDonkey.com conducted a survey of consumers, it tried to gauge support for potential regulations, especially for pre-paid cards, for which final rules have yet to be issued.

"Credit cards have a lot of protection but prepaid cards have hardly any," said Charles Tran, founder of CreditDonkey.com. "When we asked consumers if they supported regulations to add consumer protection from liability, most said yes. But when we asked if they were willing to pay higher fees in exchange for those new rules, that number dropped sharply."

For example, 83.6% supported the idea of requiring prepaid debit card issuers to limit consumer liability for unauthorized transactions, similar to those provided for credit cards. But when told that adding that regulation could result in higher fees, support dropped to just 51%.

Could be costly

Why should fees go up if pre-paid card issuers are required to provide liability protection? Tran says the companies will argue that their costs will go up.

"If there is $10 left on a card and the consumer loses it, the company would not only have to replace the $10 but have customer service in place that could process it," he said.

When asked if they support a proposed rule to make it easier for non-working spouses and partners to obtain credit cards, 52% said yes. But when asked if they would accept higher fees or interest rates in exchange for that change, the number fell to 30%.

The CFPB announced last May it planned to add new consumer protections for the prepaid card market. It collected comments last summer but hasn't issued final rules yet.

Growth of prepaid cards

The agency notes that consumers loaded an estimated $57 billion onto prepaid cards in 2011 and the market is projected to achieve a 42 percent per year growth rate from 2010 to 2014.

With more consumers leaving the traditional banking system, no longer maintaining checking accounts, prepaid cards have become a principle way to making purchases and paying bills. By 2014 consumers are projected to load $167 billion onto prepaid cards.

To help consumers better understand prepaid cards, CFPB has launched "Ask CFPB: Prepaid Cards," a searchable database with easy-to-understand answers to more than 80 consumer questions.

But CFPB may have difficulty starting a dialog with consumers on this issue. Tran said the CreditDonkey.com survey asked consumers if they had heard of the Federal Trade Commision (FTC); 87% said they had. However, only 37% had heard of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB).

The clock is ticking on the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau's (CFPB) 60 day comment period to gather consumer input about the effects of the 2009 CARD...

Article Image

Consumers unlikely to see credit card surcharges

Thanks to a settlement between retailers and Visa and MasterCard, retailers are now allowed to pass along the swipe fees they pay to the credit card networks to consumers.

Should consumers be worried? No, says Erik Larson, CEO of online financial resource NextAdvisor.com.

"I think it's extremely unlikely many retailers will choose to do this, for a number of reasons," Larson said. "For starters, ten states still ban it, including California, New York and Florida.

That means chains and franchise operations would not be able to make it a nationwide policy since they couldn't be consistent. If they have stores in any of those ten states, those stores couldn't participate.

Here's another reason: if the business also accepted American Express, they would be prevented from passing on the swipe fee to customers using Visa or MasterCard.

Visa MasterCard settlement

The whole issue is the result of a settlement between retailers and Visa and MasterCard. Neither American Express nor Discover were party to the suit and are not covered by the settlement.

American Express has always had a policy of not allowing retailers to, essentially, give consumers a cash discount. They haven't changed. The rule that emerged from the settlement requires retailers to pass along the swipe fee to all credit card customers or none at all. If a business accepted all credit cards, they would be prevented from passing on the swipe fee.

So really, the only retailers who could charge this fee are those that do not operate nationally and who only accept Visa and MasterCard. Of those, mostly "mom and pops," Larson thinks they are highly unlikely to tack on the fee for competitive reasons. And really, there's no need for it.

Baked into the price

"These fees have been incorporated into prices for a long time," he said. "Today, stores anticipate their customers paying with a credit or debt card."

The companies that process credit card payments charge retailers a fee, based on the percentage of the purchase. The retailers sued, arguing that the fee was too high.

As part of a settlement last year, retailers got lower swipe fees, along with the right to pass them on to consumers if they wanted to. But to Larson, it's not really an issue that consumers will face.

Over-hyped

"It's absolutely been over-hyped," Larson said. "There are so many reasons not to pass on the swipe fee that most stores simply won't. Just because they can, doesn't mean they will."

In addition to California, New York and Florida, states that continue to prevent retailers from passing along swipe fees are Colorado, Connecticut, Kansas, Maine and Massachusetts.

Thanks to a settlement between retailers and Visa and MasterCard, retailers are now allowed to pass along the swipe fees they pay to the credit card networ...

Article Image

Some cards protect you from fraud better than others

It can happen. You lose your wallet or your purse is stolen. Quick, how many and what kind of credit and debit cards have been lost and, more importantly, what is your liability if some unauthorized person uses your cards?

The answer all depends on what type of card it is. If you're lucky, the thief will try to use your credit card. And it's the card you should be using too.

“A credit card is the safest type of payment vehicle for people to use for two reasons,” said Odysseas Papadimitriou, CEO of Card Hub, a credit card comparison site. “First, card network liability policies are simply more advantageous to the consumer when it comes to credit card transactions than transactions involving debit cards, prepaid cards, or ATM cards. Credit cards also make fraud easier to deal with given the inherent way in which they work.”

Consumer fraud liability study

Papadimitriou, whose firm has produced a new consumer fraud liability study, says consumers have up to 25 days to pay their bill once their monthly statement becomes available. It's assumed the consumer will be more likely to notice and report suspicious charges before they have to pay.

Credit cards, then, offer the best fraud liability protection for consumers, as all four major card networks provide $0 liability guarantees for unauthorized credit card transactions. In cases of fraudulent credit card use, it's usually the merchant that accepted the card as payment who is on the hook.

That's not always the case with a compromised debit card.

Debit cards

“With a debit card, on the other hand, money gets removed from your account at the time a purchase is made,” Papadimitriou said. “That means you’ll not only have to try to recoup your lost funds, but you may also inadvertently bounce a few checks in the meantime if you aren’t keeping a watchful eye on your account activity. Plus, you also have to consider the psychological trauma, if you will, that comes with unexpectedly finding your bank account empty.”

But there are ways consumers can reduce their risk when using a debit card. When using the card to make a purchase, you have the choice of processing it as a debit or credit transaction. If you choose “credit,” you authorize the purchase with your signature. If you process it as a debit transaction, you use a PIN.

Consumers get better protection when they sign for a purchase instead of using their PIN. In fact, Consumers are not liable for fraud related to signature debit card transactions, regardless of the card network. Reloadable prepaid cards offer the same fraud liability protections as traditional debit cards.

If you do use your PIN for a transaction, your liability will vary, depending on whether it's a Visa or MasterCard. Visa offers limited protection, depending on the network that processes the transaction. MasterCard does not offer added liability protection for unauthorized PIN debit card transactions.

Discover and American Express

Discover, meanwhile, extends its $0 liability guarantee to all PIN debit transactions and American Express is not in the business of providing debit-based PIN transactions. But Papadimitriou says both cards set themselves apart in the fraud protections they provide.

“People who have Discover and American Express cards in their wallets benefit from something that that VISA and MasterCard users don’t: blanket liability coverage and the peace of mind that comes with it,” Papadimitriou said.

“They know that no matter what type of card they use or transaction they make, the hit for any fraud that may crop up won’t be theirs to take. Since the dangers of fraud are largely psychological, in that the incidence of it is quite low and the chances you’ll personally lose any money are even lower, Discover and Amex have a distinct advantage over the competition in this regard.”

Lessons

There are several lessons here for consumers. First, make a credit card your primary spending vehicle, rather than a debit card. It's much safer.

When using your debit card, select the credit/signature option instead of entering your PIN. It will limit your liability.

When paying in a restaurant, always fill in all the fields, including tip, even if you are paying the tip in cash. Put $0 in the box instead of leaving it blank.

When you do use you PIN, safeguard it carefully, and don't share it with anyone else.

Finally, if you haven't already, make a list of your credit and debit cards, their account numbers and expiration dates, along with customer service telephone numbers. Print out the list, do not save it on a computer. Place the list in a secure location, just in case.

It can happen. You lose your wallet or your purse is stolen. Quick, how many and what kind of credit and debit cards have been lost and, more importantly, ...

Article Image

Some New Millennium Bank customers to get refunds

In a settlement with the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), New Millennium Bank has agreed to make restitution to certain credit card customers.

The consent order stems from action FDIC took against the bank in 2010 regarding its credit card marketing and administrative practices. Under the order, the bank will make restitution payments to certain customers adversely affected by its prior practices, and pay to the FDIC a civil penalty.

New Millennium was a major supplier of secured credit cards offered to consumers with a poor credit rating. The cards had a low credit limit and large fees, even though they were secured by a fairly large payment by the consumer and held by the bank.

Lots of complaints

ConsumerAffairs received a barrage of complaints in 2010 from consumers who either didn't understand the terms of the card agreement or who were unable to get a card, even after sending in a payment.

"I applied for a secured credit card in April 2010 and had to pay a $99.95 processing fee," Paul, of Albany, NY, wrote in July 2010. "I did not receive the welcome kit I was supposed to receive. I called today because I have not received a welcome kit and was told that there was a suspension placed on issuing new cards or accepting deposits because of the new credit card regulations, that this started two weeks ago and that it would be resolved soon, but that there was no specific date the cards would be issued. I Googled it afterwards and found out this has been in place since May 10. I am not expecting my card, a refund, or the suspension to be lifted."

Waiting for a card

Gwendolyn, of Orlando, Fla., reported that same year that she responded to a mailer from the bank but got no card. Abraham of Far Rockaway, NY, reported a similar experience.

"I was pre-approved for a credit card with the premise that I must first send a processing fees," Abraham wrote in a ConsumerAffairs post. "My check was cashed and there was no card. I have waited for over two months now."

New Millennium came under FDIC investigation in 2010 and later that year, the agency forced the bank to suspend its credit card activities because of its consumer disclosure and compliance program.

In announcing its settlement with FDIC, New Millennium announced it is selling its remaining credit card portfolio to another financial institution and fully exiting the credit card business. The transaction is expected to close soon, subject to regulatory approval.

In a settlement with the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), New Millennium Bank has agreed to make restitution to certain credit card customers....

Article Image

Time for a checkup: How is credit card reform working out?

In 2009, President Barack Obama signed into law the Credit Card Accountability Responsibility and Disclosure Act of 2009 (CARD Act). The goal was to bring fairness and transparency to the credit card market.

Now, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) wants to know if the CARD Act is doing its job -- how it has affected the daily lives of consumers and the behavior of industry. To do that, the CFPB is seeking public comment from consumers, credit card issuers, industry analysts, consumer advocates and others on the effects of the CARD Act.

“The CARD Act made major changes in the credit card marketplace in order to better protect consumers,” said CFPB Director Richard Cordray. “With today’s inquiry, the Bureau is seeking to understand how the credit card market is working in practice and how the CARD Act changes have affected consumers and credit card issuers.”

CARD conference

In February 2011, the CFPB held a conference to assess the CARD Act’s impact on the marketplace one year after many of the Act’s provisions took effect. It found that the Act had largely curtailed the long-standing practice of hiking interest rates on existing cardholder accounts -- prior to the CARD Act, credit card companies often raised customers’ interest rates with little or no advance warning. The conference also found that the CARD Act had substantially reduced consumer late fees and nearly eliminated overlimit fees.

Now, the agency is seeking to gather more information on the effects of this law as of today. The CARD Act requires that the CFPB conduct a review of the consumer credit market. As part of that review, the Bureau is seeking public comment from consumers, credit card issuers, industry analysts, consumer advocates, and others on the effects of the CARD Act.

Areas of inquiry

Some of the specific areas the agency is requesting information on include:

  • The terms of credit card agreements and practices of credit card issuers: The bureau wants to know how the terms and conditions of credit card agreements may have changed since the CARD Act went into effect and how effective disclosures of rates, fees, and other cost terms of credit card accounts have been. The CFPB is looking to see how card issuers may have changed their pricing, marketing, underwriting, or other practices in the wake of the CARD Act and whether or not those changes have benefited or harmed consumers.
  • The success of protections against unfair or deceptive acts or practices: The CFPB is looking for information on the extent to which unfair or deceptive acts and practices still exist in the credit card market and whether issuers have circumvented -- or tried to circumvent -- any CARD Act protections against unfair or deceptive acts or practices.
  • Changes in the cost and availability of credit: The bureau is evaluating how the cost and availability of credit has changed since the CARD Act, and will consider the extent to which the upfront interest rate, and all-in cost of credit has changed when controlled for risk.
  • The use of risk-based pricing: The CFPB is considering the changes in the incidence of risk-based pricing in the credit card market, including the adoption of alternative practices in the wake of rules that restrict account repricing.

The review will culminate in a publicly available report to Congress on the state of the consumer credit card market. The data gathered will be used in determining future policy decisions.

In 2009, President Barack Obama signed into law the Credit Card Accountability Responsibility and Disclosure Act of 2009 (CARD Act). The goal was to bring ...

Article Image

No substitute for checking your credit report annually

When it comes to your credit score, paying your credit card bill on time may be a lot more important than paying your mortgage or car payment promptly.

That's one of the findings of  a study of the credit reporting industry released today by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB), the new federal agency that has the power to regulate just about every nook and cranny of the financial services business

The CFPB's study of Equifax Information Services, LLC, Experian Information Solutions Inc. and TransUnion LLC is perhaps the most comprehensive study of credit reporting to date.

Consumers rate Equifax

It found that credit card history dominates the information in credit reports and that debt collection items  generate the highest rate of disputes.

“Today’s study is another step toward bringing more clarity to the confusing world of credit reports. It will help educate regulators and consumers about how this important industry works,” said CFPB Director Richard Cordray. "If consumers know how these companies handle their credit histories, they can make better decisions on how to handle their financial lives."

Annual check-up essential

In a conference call with reporters yesterday, Cordray said the agency's study shows how important it is for consumers to check their credit ratings regularly.

"Nobody has as much incentive to protect you as you have to protect yourself. Checking your credit report can uncover errors. Everyone should conduct this self-check at least once every year," Cordray said.

Consumers rate Experian

Consumers who check their reports routinly find errors, he said, and added: "If consumers don't check their report, these errors can persist and can block them from making an important purchase or cause them to pay a higher interest rate than they should."

Federal law provides that every consumer can get a free annual report from each of the three credit agencies -- but only at this site: www.annualcreditreport.com.

Be careful! There are many similarly-named sites, including freecreditreport.com, which are commercial sites that charge a fee for their service. And navigating www.annualcreditreport.com can also be tricky. You must read each prompt carefully to be sure you are not ordering costly options.

New supervision

The CFPB is the first federal government agency that supervises both consumer reporting companies and those that provide consumer reporting companies with consumers’ credit information, such as large banks and many types of nonbanks.

Consumers rate Trans Union

In July, the CFPB adopted a rule to extend its supervision authority to cover larger consumer reporting agencies. In September, the CFPB released a study examining credit scores that compared credit scores sold to creditors and those sold to consumers.

It found that while credit scores sold by credit bureaus to consumers were generally highly correlated with credit scores used by lenders, about one in five consumers would likely receive a score that could be materially different from what a lender would see.

In October, the CFPB began accepting individual complaints about credit reporting companies. If a consumer files a complaint with a credit reporting company and is dissatisfied with the resolution, the CFPB is available to assist. Consumers can find out more at: https://help.consumerfinance.gov/app/creditreporting/ask

When it comes to your credit score, paying your credit card bill on time may be a lot more important than paying your mortgage or car payment promptly.Th...

Article Image

Feds nail National Card Monitor, LLC

The Internet is crawling with companies that claim they can get you a low-interest credit card, even if your credit is on a par with Greece. All it takes, supposedly, is a few hundred dollars upfront.

This, of course, almost never pans out, and the Federal Trade Commission has shut down several such companies recently, The latest is National Card Monitor, LLC, which charged consumers up to $599 upfront to supposedly secure a new low-rate credit card on their behalf.

According to the FTC’s complaint, the defendants sought out consumers seeking relief from high credit card interest rates. In the scheme, telemarketers working for National cold-called consumers and told them the company could reduce their credit card interest rates to as low as zero percent by obtaining new lower-rate cards on their behalf, onto which they could transfer existing balances.

Consumers who accepted the offer were required to pay an advance fee, typically ranging from $499 to $599. National also claimed it had a 100 percent money-back guarantee, and assured that consumers that if they did not get the promised cards they would receive a full refund.

After paying the fee, however, most consumers found out that National failed to deliver on its promise to secure a new credit card on their behalf, and that getting a “guaranteed” refund of their payment was very difficult, the FTC alleged.

The agency’s complaint also alleges National called consumers whose numbers are on the Do Not Call Registry and never paid the fees required to access registered phone numbers in the area codes its telemarketers call.

The Internet is crawling with companies that claim they can get you a low-interest credit card, even if your credit is on a par with Greece. All it takes, ...

Article Image

Feds Slam Five Robocallers

The Federal Trade Commission has pulled the plug on five companies based in Arizona and Florida that were allegedly responsible for millions of illegal pre-recorded calls from “Rachel” and others from “Cardholder Services.”  State agencies in Arizona, Arkansas, and Florida also took legal action against similar companies.

Federal courts granted the agency’s request to temporarily halt five robocall operations that allegedly deceived consumers into paying hundreds or thousands of dollars by making phony claims that they could reduce credit card interest rates in return for an upfront fee.

“At the FTC, Rachel from Cardholder Services is public enemy number one,” said FTC Chairman Jon Leibowitz.  “We’re cracking down on illegal robocalls by bringing law enforcement actions and pursuing technical solutions to the problem.”

The FTC gets more than 200,000 complaints each month about telemarketing robocalls, including calls from “Rachel” that pitch consumers with a supposedly easy way to save money by reducing their credit card interest rates.  After collecting an up-front fee, however, the FTC believes that the companies do little if anything to fulfill their promises.

At the recent Robocall Summit, the FTC issued a challenge to the public offering a $50,000 cash prize for the best technical solution to block illegal robocalls on landlines and mobile phones.

Hi, I'm Rachel

In the robocall cases announced today, the FTC alleges that the defendants place automated calls to consumers, typically with a prerecorded message from “Rachel” or someone else from “Cardholder Services.”  

The calls purport to have an “important message” regarding an opportunity to reduce high credit card interest rates.  Consumers are urged to “press 1” to connect with a live representative, or “press 2” to discontinue getting such calls.  Consumers who press 1 are connected to live telemarketers. 

Most consumers have no way to screen the calls using Caller ID, as the incoming number allegedly is often “spoofed,” or displayed as a false number.  In many cases, the name displayed on the Caller ID is so generic, such as “Card Services,” that it provides little information about who is calling.

Deceptive offers

According to the FTC, consumers who reach a live telemarketer are then pitched allegedly deceptive offers to have their credit card interest rates substantially reduced, sometimes to as low as 6.9 or even zero percent. 

The telemarketers allegedly guarantee that lowering card interest rates will save the consumers thousands of dollars in finance charges in a short period of time and will allow them to pay off the balances more quickly.  Some telemarketers allegedly claim that consumers will save at least $2,500 in finance charges and will be able to pay off their balances two to three times faster, without increasing their monthly payments.

In some cases, according to the FTC, the telemarketers claim to be calling from the consumer’s credit card company.  In other cases, they use “Cardholder Services” to suggest a relationship with a bank or credit card company. 

If the consumer expresses an interest in the rate reduction offer, the telemarketer sometimes conducts a purported “audit” to determine whether the consumer qualifies.  Consumers provide their financial and personal information, and are then put on hold while the “audit” is completed.  According to the FTC, the “audit” typically is used only to determine whether consumers have enough credit available on their credit cards to pay the company’s fee.

After consumers have been “approved” for the program, according to the FTC, the telemarketer informs them that there is an up-front fee, typically ranging from several hundred dollars to nearly $3,000.  To convince them to pay the fee, telemarketers often say that it will be more than offset by the money the consumer will save through the program.  

In some cases, the FTC alleges that consumers’ credit cards were charged even if they did not agree to pay for the service.  In other cases, the defendants allegedly do not disclose a fee at all, or claim there will be no fee.

The Federal Trade Commission has pulled the plug on five companies based in Arizona and Florida that were allegedly responsible for millions of illegal pre...

Article Image

The Worst Credit Cards of 2012

A number of lenders compete to convince you their credit card is best. But what are the credit cards you should avoid?

For starters, avoid cards that levy high interest rates and charge a large annual fee. There are just too many cards out there that offer better deals.

The credit card site CardHub.com has analyzed the current offerings -- more than 1,000 -- and come up with a handful of cards that it says consumers should avoid.

General consumer credit cards – rewards

Credit card companies offer rewards, either cash back or points toward other purchases, to build loyalty. The worst in this category, according to CardHub, is the Visa Black Card, a product offered by Barclaycard US. This is not to be confused with the famed Centurion Card from American Express.

While the latter is a status symbol and a pop culture staple, CardHub says the former is just grossly overpriced, charging a $495 annual fee for a measly 1 point per $1 spent, airport lounge access and the vague promise of luxury gifts.

“It’s obvious that the Visa Black Card’s pricing is one of the ways that Barclaycard US is trying to fool consumers into thinking they’re getting the Black Card they see their favorite musicians and actors flaunting,” said Card Hub CEO Odysseas Papadimitriou. “They want you to think, ‘If it’s that expensive, it must be the real deal.’ However, the Centurion Card is rumored to have a $5,000 initial fee and a $2,500 annual fee. Besides, its secrecy is part of its lore, so the fact that you can even apply for the Visa Black Card online or see commercials for it on TV should tip you off that it’s not the real deal.”

General-consumer credit cards – big-ticket new purchases

Some credit cards give you a low introductory rate for new large purchases. Obviously, the lower the rate and the longer the introductory period, the better. CardHub says Arvest Bank Classic Credit Card offers a 4.9 percent interest rate for six month before it kicks up to 17.9 percent. CardHub says you can do a lot better.

“There are simply too many credit cards out there offering 0% introductory APRs for well over a year to even consider a card whose intro rate is nearly 5% and lasts for only six months,” Papadimitriou said. “In fact, the average 0% credit card offers that rate for over 10 months. This card’s inferiority is best illustrated when you compare it to the likes of the Citi Diamond Preferred and Citi Simplicity cards, both of which offer 0% on new purchases for 18 months.”

General-consumer credit cards – balance transfers

Consumers often apply for a new credit card that will allow them to transfer a high-interest balance from another card and pay a lower interest rate. That's a sound strategy for speeding up the pay-down of your account balance.

The worst of the balance transfer cards, according to CardHub, is the UBS Preferred Visa Signature card. It offers a 9.99% introductory balance transfer APR for 6 months and charges a 3% balance transfer fee as well as a $495 annual fee. Papadimitriou says there are plenty of cards that offer a 0% balance transfer option. A much better choice, he says.

Rebuilding credit

A number of cards promote themselves as a means for consumers to rebuild a damaged credit rating. All too often the cards in this category have the worst terms for consumers. But CardHub says the First Premier Bank Gold Card stands out.

In addition to a 36% interest rate, this card charges a $95.00 processing fee prior to account opening, a $75.00 annual fee during the first year, a $45 annual fee in each subsequent year, a $6.25 monthly fee beginning in the second year, and a 25% fee for any credit limit increase.

“When you’re building credit, you want a card with the lowest possible fee structure,” Papadimitriou said. “And under no circumstances should you waste $170 in fees when you can take $30 more and place a $200 fully refundable security deposit for a secured credit card with a $29 annual fee.”

“I knew that the credit limit was going to be very low ($300), but didn't care as my only intention was to further establish my credit,” Les, of Bradley, IL, wrote in a ConsumerAffairs post about First Premier. “However, I didn't read all of the fine print (my fault) prior to receiving the card and soon found out that by the time they were finished applying all the needless charges i.e. annual fees, one-time fees, etc., I actually only had roughly $50 available for spending purposes. In the end, I ended up -$250 by the time I received the card.”

Credit card for students

Many students head off to college with a new credit card for expenses or emergencies. Which one should you avoid. CardHub awards the honor to U.S. Bank College Visa, saying it doesn’t provide any rewards or low introductory rates and students may end up with a regular APR as high as 20.99% APR -- the highest rate among student cards.

A common mistake consumers make is applying for a card based on an advertising mailer that arrives in their mailbox. The best strategy is to think about what you want from a credit card and compare as many options in that category as possible.

A number of lenders compete to convince you their credit card is best. But what are the credit cards you should avoid?For starters, avoid cards that levy...

Article Image

Barnes & Noble Hit by Hackers But Online Accounts Are Safe, Company Says

Barnes & Noble says hackers broke into payment devices at 63 of its stores nationwide and may have stolen credit and debit card information from customers.

"We have detected a sophisticated criminal effort to steal credit and debit card information from our customers who have swiped their cards through PIN pads when they made purchases at certain retail stores. The tampered devices were capable of capturing information such as name, card account number, and PIN," the company said.

Barnes & Noble said it discovered the tampering during maintenance and inspection of the devices and has discontinued the use of all PIN pads in all of its stores.

Customers can make transactions securely today by asking booksellers to swipe their cards through the card readers connected to cash registers, the company said.

Consumers rate Barnes & Noble
"We want to reassure you that this situation does not involve any purchases you may have made at Barnes & Noble.com or using your NOOK or a NOOK mobile app. The Barnes & Noble member database is secure. The tampering only affected transactions in which customers swiped their cards at one of the compromised in-store PIN pads," the company said in a statement on its website.

Machines were tampered with in Connecticut, Florida, Illinois, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania and Rhode Island. 

In Connecticut, where three stores were hit, Attorney General George Jepsen wants to know what Barnes & Noble is doing to protect its customers.

“Given the possible impact on individuals in Connecticut and elsewhere, my office is requesting detailed information on how this breach occurred, what steps have been taken to protect the affected individuals, and what new procedures have been adopted to prevent future data breaches,” Jepsen wrote in a letter to Gene DeFelice, the company’s vice president, general counsel and corporate secretary.
Customers who are concerned that their credit card numbers may have been compromised should take the following actions, the company said:

Debit Card Users:

  • Change the PIN numbers on your debit cards
  • Review your accounts for unauthorized transactions
  • Notify your banks immediately if you discover any unauthorized purchases or withdrawals

Credit Card Users:

  • Review your statements for any unauthorized transactions
  • Notify your card-issuing banks if you discover any unauthorized purchases or cash advances

Stores listed

Here is a list of the stores B&N has identified as being hit by hackers.

Store Address

City

State

Zip

4735 Commons Way

Calabasas

CA

91302

2470 Tuscany Street Suite 101

Corona

CA

92881

2015 Birch Road Suite 700

Chula Vista

CA

91915

313 Corte Madera Town Center

Corte Madera

CA

94925

5604 Bay Street

Emeryville

CA

94608

810 West Valley Parkway

Escondido

CA

92025

1315 E. Gladstone Street

Glendora

CA

91740

5183 Montclair Plaza Lane

Montclair

CA

91763

894 Marsh St Bldg G

San Luis Obispo

CA

93401

2615 Vista Way

Oceanside

CA

92054

72-840 Highway 111 Suite 425

Palm Desert

CA

92260

27460 West Lugonia Ave

Redlands

CA

92374

1150 El Camino Real Space 277

San Bruno

CA

94066

10775 Westview Parkway

San Diego

CA

92126

3600 Stevens Creek Blvd

San Jose

CA

95117

11 West Hillsdale Blvd.

San Mateo

CA

94403

9938 Mission Gorge Road

Santee

CA

92071

40570 Winchester Rd

Temecula

CA

92591

4820 Telephone Road

Ventura

CA

93003

1149 S. Main St.

Walnut Creek

CA

94596

470 Universal Drive North

North Haven

CT

06473

100 Greyrock Place Suite H009

Stamford

CT

06901

60 Isham Road

W. Hartford

CT

06107

18711 NE Biscayne Blvd

Aventura

FL

33180

333 N. Congress Avenue

Boynton Beach

FL

33436

152 Miracle Mile

Coral Gables

FL

33134

1900 W International Spdway

Daytona Beach

FL

32114

2051 N. Federal Highway

Fort Lauderdale

FL

33305

12405 N Kendall Drive

Miami

FL

33186

11380 Legacy Ave

Palm Beach Gardens

FL

33410

14572 SW 5th St Suite 10140

Pembroke Pines

FL

33027

11820 Pines Blvd

Pembroke Pines

FL

33026

5701 Sunset Drive Suite 196

S. Miami

FL

33143

700 Rosemary Ave Unit #104

West Palm Beach

FL

33401

1441 West Webster Avenue

Chicago

IL

60614

1130 North State Street

Chicago

IL

60610

5380 Route 14

Crystal Lake

IL

60014

20600 North Rand Road

Deer Park

IL

60010

728 North Waukegan Road

Deerfield

IL

60015

1630 Sherman Avenue

Evanston

IL

60201

1468 Springhill Mall Blvd

W. Dundee

IL

60118

170 Boylston Street

Chestnut Hill

MA

02467

96 Derby Street Suite 300

Hingham

MA

02043

82 Providence Highway

East Walpole

MA

2032

395 Route 3 East

Clifton

NJ

07014

55 Parsonage Road

Edison

NJ

08837

2134 State Highway 35

Holmdel

NJ

07733

4831 US Hwy 9

Howell

NJ

07731

23-80 Bell Blvd.

Bayside

NY

11360

176-60 Union Turnpike

Fresh Meadows

NY

11366

1542 Northern Blvd

Manhasset

NY

11030

160 E 54th Street (Citicorp)

New York

NY

10022

2289 Broadway

New York

NY

10024

33 East 17th Street (Union Square)

New York

NY

10003

555 Fifth Ave

New York

NY

10017

2245 Richmond Avenue

Staten Island

NY

10314

230 Main St

White Plains

NY

10601

97 Warren Street

New York

NY

10007

100 West Bridge Street

Homestead

PA

15120

800 Settlers Ridge Center Drive

Pittsburgh

PA

15205

1311 West Main Road

Middleton

RI

02842

371 Putnam Pike Suite 330

Smithfield

RI

02917

1350-B Bald Hill Rd

Warwick

RI

02886

Barnes & Noble says hackers broke into payment devices at 63 of its stores nationwide and may have stolen credit and debit card information from custom...

Article Image

Capital One '0% Balance Transfer' a Hoax, Suit Charges

Capital One Bank dupes credit cardholders into accepting a "0% balance transfer" offer that leaves people worse off than before, a class action claims in Federal Court, Courthouse News Service reports.

In the suit, Priscilla Barton accuses Capital One of "deceptive representations and omissions surrounding its '0%' balance transfer offers."

"Numerous times every year, Cap One solicits its cardholder base to take 0% balance transfers," she alleges in the complaint. "Cap One markets the balance transfers as a 'chance to save' - a means for the cardholder to pay off higher interest loans owed to other creditors. Cap One promises that these balance transfers will carry 0% interest for six or twelve months. ... Cap One promises that it will segregate the transferred balance from other segments of the cardholder's account. The balance transfer comes at a cost: Cap One charges the cardholder a fee of 2%-3% of the total balance transferred."

But, in fact, says Barton, once a cardholder accepts Cap One's '0% interest' balance transfer offer, Cap One unilaterally, and in breach of the cardholder agreement, eliminates the usual grace period and begins charging interest on all new purchases from the date of the balance transfer forward.

Consumers rate Capital One

Normally, under Capital One's standard credit card arrangement, customers have 25 days after the close of each billing cycle to pay their "new balance" without interest, Barton says.

"Cap One did not disclose that it would eliminate the grace period for cardholders who accepted Cap One's 0% balance transfer offers and subject them to high interest charges," she alleges. 

Other complaints

Barton is far from the only consumer to feel misused. Terry of Lincoln, Neb., recently posted to ConsumerAffairs about her experience, sayine she accepted an offer of 0% APR for 12 months for balance transfers and purchases.

"To confirm this offer, we made a call and spoke to a customer service representative. We were told over the phone by this person that if we took this offer  ... there would be 0% APR on purchases and balance transfers till April 2013. So we agreed to do a balance transfer from another credit card, and had no issues."

But then, said Terry, she noticed she was being charged interest on her purchases.

"They said our account had no such agreement. We did not qualify for 0% APR on purchases, only balance transfers. ... [T]hey wouldn't do anything about agreeing to the terms of the offer we received in the mail. They kept telling us that we never took an offer."

Capital One Bank dupes credit cardholders into accepting a "0% balance transfer" offer that leaves people worse off than before, a class action claims in F...

Article Image

College Students and Credit Cards: What Role do Parents Play?

A few years ago college students found themselves saddled with mounting credit card debt, in addition to student loans. Credit card companies eagerly sponsored campus events, signing up students for credit cards, even though they had no source of income besides Mom and Dad.

The CARD Act, signed into law in 2009, went a long way to end those activities. Researchers at East Carolina University say parents should do more to help their college-bound children make sensible financial decisions.

The researchers analyzed data for 413 undergraduate students from seven different American universities, who took part in the College Student Financial Literacy Survey. Through an online survey, the authors examined credit card debt and number of credit cards owned.

Parental influence

In particular, the researchers honed in on students’ interactions with their parents when discussing finances as a family, their years of work experience, financial knowledge of credit cards, loans, insurance, and personal finance. They also asked how comfortable they were making only the minimum payment each month.

Overall, nearly two-thirds of students had a credit card, and nearly a third had more than one. Gender and class year were the top predictors of the number of credit cards students had, followed by parents who argued about finances.

Specifically, juniors and seniors were nearly four times more likely to report having two or more cards, and females were more than twice as likely as males to have two or more cards.

Arguing parents a bad sign

Students who reported that their parents argued about finances were also twice as likely to have more than two cards than those who reported having parents who did not argue about finances. In addition, those comfortable with minimum payments were also more likely to have more cards.

In terms of debt, those students who had two or more credit cards were nearly three times more likely to report having credit card debt over $500. Parental influence, and parental arguments about finances specifically, was also one of the top predictors of a student having a credit card debt over $500.

“It is clear that the influence of parents cannot be underplayed,” the authors concluded. “Researchers, educators and policymakers should work with, and include, parents in finding effective ways to increase the positive financial behaviors of college students, particularly those behaviors related to credit card use. We need to help students and parents learn financial skills and establish healthy financial attitudes at earlier ages to prevent poor financial habits from taking root.”

Some good news

A survey of college students by CreditDonkey, released last month, is more encouraging, finding that most college students have improved their credit card performance In fact, it found that 30 percent of college students polled said they did not have a single credit card.

A major problem with credit cards is that consumers often run up their balances, intending to pay them down in the future, but find they are never able to do so. As a result, they suddenly find themselves with balances of several thousand dollars and, at credit cards' high interest rates, it is all they can do to keep up with the interest payments.

The CreditDonkey survey suggests college students have yet to fall into that trap. When asked how much they pay on their credit card bill each month, a surprising 42 percent said they paid off the balance each month. Only 17 percent confessed to paying just the minimum each month.

A few years ago college students found themselves saddled with credit card debt, in addition to student loans. Credit card companies eagerly sponsored camp...

Article Image

New Rule Would Make It Easier for Non-Working Spouses to Get Credit Cards

Spouses of the female variety were once regarded as chattels -- portable personal property. Like human appliances, they were useful for cooking, cleaning, bearing children and performing other domestic tasks as well as providing certain types of, shall we say, entertainment and companionship. 

They could not vote or own their own personal property and whatever credit they had access to was granted solely by their master.

Things have changed considerably but it is still difficult for spouses and domestic partners who don't have trust funds or jobs outside the home to qualify for credit cards in their own name. But that may change.

Today the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) proposed a new rule that would make it easier for non-working spouses and partners to qualify for credit cards by relying on their spouse's shared income. 

"Common-sense changes"

“When stay-at-home spouses or partners have the ability to make payments on a credit card, they should be able to obtain a card in their own name,” said CFPB Director Richard Cordray.  “Today the CFPB is proposing common-sense changes that would facilitate credit access for spouses or partners who do not work outside the home.” 

The Credit Card Accountability Responsibility and Disclosure Act (CARD Act) became law in 2009.  The CARD Act requires that card issuers evaluate a consumer’s ability to make the necessary payments before opening a new credit card account. Under current CARD Act regulations issued by the Federal Reserve, a card issuer generally may only consider the individual card applicant’s income or assets.  

Data made available to the CFPB suggest that some otherwise credit-worthy individuals have been declined for credit card accounts under the current regulation, even though they have the ability to make the required payments, the agency said.  Discussions with industry sources indicate that a significant number of these individuals may be stay-at-home spouses or partners with access to income from an employed spouse or partner.

The Bureau’s proposed revision would allow credit card applicants who are 21 or older to rely on third-party income to which they have a reasonable expectation of access.  Although the proposal applies to all applicants regardless of marital status, the Bureau expects that it will ease access to credit particularly for stay-at-home spouses or partners who have access to a working spouse or partner’s income.

According to the Census, over 16 million married people do not work outside the home.  That equates to approximately one out of every three married couples who now could have easier access to credit cards with the Bureau’s proposal.  Today’s proposed change would make it easier for consumers who are 21 or older to qualify for credit cards if they can afford the payments. 

Spouses of the female variety were once regarded as chattels -- portable personal property. Like human appliances, they were useful for cooking, cleaning, ...

Article Image

How to Find the Right Balance Transfer Credit Card

It doesn't take long to run up a huge credit card balance. Paying it off is another matter.

Because of credit cards' high interest rate levels, much of your monthly payment goes to interest. Minimum payments are higher too, thanks to changes in the law.

Transferring your credit card balance to a card with a lower interest rate may be one way to speed up the payoff time, as long as the card doesn't have other fees that can add to the balance. Selecting the right card for a transfer is important.

The small business information website NextAdvisor.com has introduced a Balance Transfer Calculator, to help consumers find the best offer for their particular situation. The calculator automatically estimates the total finance charges and other fees consumers can expect to pay after transferring existing credit card balances onto popular balance transfer cards.

Thirteen different credit cards were included, from the well known Slate from Chase and Citi Simplicity cards to the Capital One Platinum Prestige and Discover More cards.

The Balance Transfer Calculator is unique because users don’t need to manually plug in interest rates, introductory APR time frames or other complicated information. NextAdvisor has already done the work, thoroughly researching each card’s terms and conditions and carefully reading through interest charge calculation formulas.

How it works

To use the calculator just enter the amount you plan to transfer, how much you'll be paying towards this balance each month and your current credit standing. The Balance Transfer Calculator will show the best balance transfer cards for the user, estimating the total finance charges and other fees they’ll pay and how long it will take to pay off the balance.

"With each card having a different combination of ongoing APR, introductory zero percent APR period, and fees, it’s a daunting task for any consumer to determine which credit card they should transfer a balance to in order to save the most money,” said Tasha Lockyer, Director of Product Management at NextAdvisor.com.

The calculator, she says, removed the complexity for the consumer, allowing them to enter just three pieces of information to see how much interest and fees they would pay with each card.

Obviously the more you can pay on the balance each month the quicker the balance will fall. Consumers should avoid paying just the minimum payment each month. Rather, they should determine how much they can afford to pay and pay that same amount each and every month.

It doesn't take long to run up a huge credit card balance. Paying it off is another matter.Because of credit cards' high interest rate levels, much of yo...

Article Image

Are Banks Worried About Walmart, Amex Partnership?

Walmart and American Express did more than just announce a new product this week. It appears they've fired a shot across the bow of the banking industry.

The retailer and financial services companies announced Bluebird, a new prepaid card with very few fees. It's aimed at consumers who have dropped out of banking, or are getting fed up with bank fees.

Bluebird works like a debit card. You load it with your own money and can use it online, at ATMs and anywhere American Express Cards are accepted. There are no overdraft fees, monthly service charges or activation fee.

Competitors swoon

Wall Street took note immediately. Shares of NetSpend Holdings Inc. and Green Dot Corp., two of the largest prepaid card companies, plunged soon after the announcement.

Wall Street banking industry analyst Dick Bove said American Express is charging Walmart less than what it charges banks like JP Morgan Chase, Bank of America and Wells Fargo in swipe fees.

"The Durbin Amendment sets prices on interchange fees,” Bove wrote in a note. “Wal-Mart avoids these price controls because its new product is not called a debit or cash card. It is being handled by American Express as if it were a Traveler’s Check. Presumably, by using this technique, WalMart avoids Durbin and it can receive whatever 'commission' American Express chooses to pay on these cards."

How good for consumers is it?

Suddenly, it seems, the banks are on the defensive. Does that mean Bluebird gives consumers a real alternative to banks?

“Overall, the Bluebird Prepaid Card seems like a great addition to the growing prepaid card market,” said Odysseas Papadimitriou, a former Capital One senior director and current CEO of the credit card comparison website CardHub.com. “Not only is it one of the few cards out there that’s even suitable for each of the main ways consumers use prepaid cards, but it’s also one of the least expensive options for each application.”

Papadimitriou said he based his conclusions on his analysis of what Bluebird offers and what it costs. He found it can be free to use as a replacement checking account, since it does not charge fees for activation, monthly or annual maintenance, or ATM withdrawals at 22,000 MoneyPass ATMs nationwide if you are enrolled in direct deposit.

The fact that it also offers free online bill pay means it is on par with the GreenDot Gold Prepaid Card, which was Card Hub’s selection for the Best Prepaid Card to Use as a Replacement Checking Account in 2012.

Just two negatives

Papadimitriou said he really only found two negatives: If you are a heavy ATM user and don't use direct deposit, those ATM fees will add up. Second, you can't automatically deposit federal benefits, such as Social Security or VA benefits, to the card.

“The fact that its only major fee is a $2 charge for all but your first monthly ATM withdrawal -- which is waived for those enrolled in direct deposit -- means that it will be among the least expensive prepaid cards, depending on how exactly you use it,” Papadimitriou said. “The ability to load funds via check by taking a picture through Amex’s mobile application also makes it one of the few cards suitable to be an alternative check cashing tool.”

Which all means banks should probably be worried. Walmart, after all, has repeatedly identified market segments where consumers were being poorly served and eventually owned the market. Selling a wide list of generic prescription drugs for $4 comes to mind.

In 2006 Walmart seriously considered seeking a charter for its own bank, with branches in all its stores, before finally giving up on the idea. With Bluebird, it may have revived it.

Walmart and American Express did more than just announce a new product on Monday. It appears they've fired a shot across the bow of the banking industry....

Article Image

American Express, Walmart Team Up on Prepaid Debit Card

With more lower-income consumers bailing out of the banking system American Express and Walmart are teaming up on a product aimed at that market. It's a low-fee prepaid debit card called Bluebird.

The complaint about prepaid cards has always been the fees. There are usually lots of them and not all are obvious until you start using the card. The two partners claim Bluebird will be different.

“Our customers tell us that they’re tired of navigating a complex maze of dos and don’ts to avoid the ever growing list of fees found on checking products,”said Daniel Eckert, vice president of financial services for Walmart U.S. "Bluebird solves this problem and we believe it’s the best product on the market to help customers affordably manage their everyday finances.”

Not many fees

According to the published fee schedule, there is no annual fee, activation fee or monthly service fee. Adding money from a debit card carries a $2 fee but almost all other methods are free. There's a $2 charge for out-of-network ATM withdrawals but no fee associated with purchases, including electronic bill pay.

The companies say you can deposit money in a variety of ways including payroll direct deposit, remote check capture via the Bluebird mobile app, using cash at any Walmart register, or by linking a checking, savings, or debit card to the account. The card also comes with many of the benefits associated with other American Express products.

“Bluebird is our solution to help consumers who currently may be poorly served by traditional banking products,” said Dan Schulman, group president, Enterprise Growth, American Express. “It allows them to easily and safely move, manage, and spend their money. In an era where it is increasingly 'expensive to be poor,' we have worked with Walmart to create a financial services product that rights many of the wrongs that plague the market today.”

How to apply

Consumers can sign-up for free on Bluebird.com, or choose to buy a $5 account set up kit at a local Walmart for immediate use. The set up kit includes a starter card, which can be funded with cash or a debit card at the register with any dollar amount between $1 and $500.

Once funded, the starter card can be used immediately anywhere in the United States where American Express Cards are accepted. Customers must then complete their account set up at bluebird.com in order to access the full features and benefits of Bluebird, as well as receive their personalized Bluebird card.

Walmart currently offers a prepaid Visa/Mastercard debit card with a $3 set-up fee and $3 monthly service charge.

Aimed at under-served market

A September 2012 survey by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. (FDIC) shows 28 percent of consumers either had no bank or used minimal banking services in 2011. The survey showed 821,000 more U.S. households are operating without a bank account since the first survey in 2009, representing a 0.6 percentage point increase.

More than half of all unbanked households said they do not have an account because they believe they do not have enough money or that they do not need or want an account. In addition, the report shows that three in ten households nationally don't have a savings account.

"The results of the 2011 National Survey of Unbanked and Underbanked Households indicate that insured financial institutions have an important chance to grow their customer base by expanding opportunities that bring unbanked and underbanked individuals into mainstream banking" FDIC acting chairman Martin J. Gruenberg said at the time.

With more lower-income consumers bailing out of the banking system American Express and Walmart are teaming up on a product aimed at that market. It's a lo...

Article Image

American Express' Image Tarnished by Fines, Penalties

Those spiffy new pair of shoes you bought with your American Express card? $75. That fantastic Italian meal you purchased on your way to the mall? $17.95.

Finding out you’re due for some American Express settlement money because the company duped you? Priceless.

As we reported last week, the don’t-leave-home-without-it credit card company has agreed to pay a whopping $27.5 million in civil fines, along with $85 million to customers, after being accused of several violations including charging incorrect and  illegal penalty fees.

So what effect do settlements like these have, other than costing the company a few million dollars in settlement and lawyer fees?

Well, maybe more than you'd think. ConsumerAffairs conducted a computerized sentiment analysis of more than two million consumer postings to social media over the last year and found that perceptions of Amex fell from a high of 87% favorable to just 53% currently.

Consumers are never short of complaints about their credit cards and American Express is certainy no exception.

Consumers rate American Express Platinum Card
"American Express is an uncaring, unmoving, and lousy credit card company. We are in financial hardships and have been for 3 years but American Express will not work with us," David of Guildford, CT, said in a ConsumerAffairs posting a few days ago.

The agreed-upon payout was also to settle accusations of American Express committing age discrimination against applicants and misleading consumers to believe they would be eligible for monetary bonuses after applying for a specific card.

John of Mahattan is one consumer still fuming over his attempt to redeem rewards points.

"I tried to use my 40,000 in reward points to book airline miles and the website was not working. I tried to call to book over the phone (talked to 9 different customer service reps and could not understand them due to strong Indian accents). Finally talked to someone I could understand and it was a $95 fee to book over the phone," John said. "Never thought I would say this but American Express sucks. I've been a member for several years and like everyone else, they have sold out. Makes me sad!"

The case against Amex was bought by state regulators in Utah, as well as other consumer protection agencies like the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp (FDIC) and the U.S. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB). The CFPB said American Express consistently broke consumer laws as it pertains to being forthright about late fees, charges and many of the services it provides.

“Several American Express companies violated consumer protection laws and those laws were violated at all stages of the game. From the moment a consumer shopped for a card to the moment the consumer got a phone call about long overdue debt,” said Richard Cordray of the CFPB.

The consumer protection agency also said American Express has been committing such practices for about a nine-year span, which has hindered every aspect of the credit card experience for the consumer from the onset of the application process to the bill's arrival.

“We have been troubled by the range of problems that our examination process uncovered,” said Kent Markus, CFB’s assistant director of its enforcement division. “The legal violations we discovered span the lifecycle of a consumer’s experience with American Express cards.”

ConsumerAffairs reached out to American Express and the company sent us this statement: “We worked closely with the regulators and cooperated fully with them through their reviews. We took responsibility for correcting the issues and are compensating customers where appropriate,” relayed Marina Hoffmann Norville of American Express.

Another company rep said this in a separate statement:

“Reserves were established in previous quarters for a substantial portion of these fines and the estimated customer refunds. Separately, the company is continuing its own internal reviews and cooperating with regulators in their ongoing regulatory examination of add-on products in accordance with the industry wide review.”

Started in 2003

In a routine investigation conducted by both Utah regulators and the FDIC it was first learned that American Express was committing these violations from 2003 to as recently as earlier this year.

And it seems the settlement comes at a time when government protection agencies are making a stronger effort to guard consumers from unlawful practices that many people may not be aware of.

Last week the CFPB announced the credit card company Discover would reimburse nearly 4 million of its customers about $200 million for conducting questionable sales practices.

In the case of American Express, the company has 90-days to get back to the feds with a new code of compliance, as well as fork over the first $9 million of the settlement fee.

The consent order in the settlement best describes what American Express has really been accused of: The company “failed to adequately identify, monitor and control risks associated with the services proved,” which shows consumers always have to over monitor, question and challenge each credit card statement they come across.

Those spiffy new pair of shoes you bought with your American Express card? $75. That fantastic Italian meal you purchased on your way to the mall? $17.95....

Article Image

American Express Paying $113 million for Misleading Consumers

Some American Express cardholders are about to get a refund. As a result of a coordinated regulatory action, the financial services company is paying $113 million in fines and restitution.

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB), Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. (FDIC), Office of Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) and the Utah Department of Financial Institutions participated in the investigation.

“Our investigations found that when consumers were shopping for credit cards, one American Express company sent potential customers misleading credit card offerings in the mail,” Richard Cordray, director of CFPB wrote in a summary of the case. “When consumers applied for cards, the same company engaged in practices that unlawfully discriminated on the basis of age. In connection with consumers paying their bills, American Express companies violated consumer financial laws. For example, we found that these American Express companies charged consumers excessive late fees.”

Refunds total $85 million

As a result of the the case 250,000 consumers will receive up to $85 million in refunds from America Express. American Express will return the money directly into the accounts of the affected consumers. If the consumer no longer holds the American Express card, American Express will mail a check or credit any outstanding balance.

  • Customers who were promised $300 for signing up for a Blue Sky Credit Card will get the $300.
  • Consumers who paid an illegal late fee will be reimbursed, with interest.
  • Consumers who paid old debt in response to deceptive promises to report payment to credit bureaus will be reimbursed the money they paid plus interest.
  • Consumers who were promised their debt would be forgiven but were denied new American Express cards because the debt was not really forgiven, will receive $100 and a pre-approved offer for a new card with terms we and the FDIC find acceptable. If the consumer already paid the waived or forgiven amount in order to get a new card, they will be refunded that amount plus interest.

How do you know if you have money coming to you?

No action on your part is needed

“The American Express subsidiaries will identify those consumers, notify them, and make sure they get their money back,” Cordray said. “The burden will not fall on customers to pursue their refunds. To ensure compliance with all terms of the agreements, the companies will hire independent auditors to verify that the orders are being carried out.”

This brings up another issue. Whenever there is a prominent news story about money coming back to consumers, scammers seeks to exploit the situation. If you are one of the consumers affected by the order, American Express will notify you directly.

They are responsible for notifying any affected consumers and you should not pay any fees to anyone to help recover the refund or provide any personal information. The CFPB says any entity that offers to help reclaim your money is likely a scam.

Some American Express cardholders are about to get a refund. As a result of a coordinated regulatory action, the financial services company is paying $113 ...

Article Image

Consumer Groups Step Up Pressure on Prepaid Cards

Consumer groups are claiming victory in an encounter with a bank they say evaded the law in collaborating with a payday lender.

The National Consumer Law Center (NCLC) and Center for Responsible Lending (CRL) fired off a letter to the U.S. Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) in May, claiming that Florida-based Urban Trust Bank (UTB), the issuer of the Insight prepaid cards used by the payday lender CheckSmart, was evading state payday and usury laws.

This week the OCC said it has found “violations of law and regulations and unsafe and unsound banking practices” by the institution.

The OCC said that the consumer groups’ letter “raises several troubling concerns,” including “that the prepaid cards are sold in cooperation with a major payday lender” and have “characteristics similar to predatory payday loans.”

"Banks should not help payday lenders to evade state law,” said Lauren Saunders, managing attorney of NCLC’s office in Washington. “We applaud the OCC for scrutinizing the sordid relationship between Urban Trust Bank and the CheckSmart prepaid card payday loans, and urge the OCC to eliminate payday loans completely from the Insight prepaid cards."

The groups noted that UTB and CheckSmart have discontinued one version of the prepaid card payday loans but continue to offer payday loans presented as overdraft fees of $0.15 per $1 negative balance or $15 per $100 borrowed.

Formal agreement

The OCC has entered into a Formal Agreement with UTB requiring the bank to correct legal violations, to submit an analysis of its prepaid card program that “fully assesses the risks and benefits of this line of business” and to submit for OCC review a business plan that addresses deficiencies in its oversight of CheckSmart.

“Prepaid card payday loans cannot be fixed, and Urban Trust Bank should get out of this business,” said Saunders.

After Arizona and Ohio imposed 36 and 28 percent interest rate caps, respectively, the groups claim that CheckSmart, which is owned by Community Choice Financial, Inc. (CCFI), began disguising its payday loans as a line of credit or overdraft protection on prepaid cards managed by Insight Card Services, which is part owned by CCFI, and issued by Urban Trust Bank.

The loans cost $14 to $15 per $100 borrowed, or an annual rate of about 400 percent, but the groups maintain the costs were cloaked in various fees designed to evade state laws. After the consumer groups criticized the loans, CheckSmart dropped the line of credit and CCFI called off its planned initial public offering of stock.

  Consumer groups are claiming victory in an encounter with a bank they say evaded the law in collaborating with a payday lender.The Nation...

Article Image

Consumers, Lenders See Different Credit Scores

Many consumers spend good money subscribing to services that supposedly give them factual information about their credit score. But a study released today by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) finds that about one out of five consumers would likely receive a meaningfully different score than would a lender.

“This study highlights the complexities consumers face in the credit scoring market,” said CFPB Director Richard Cordray. “When consumers buy a credit score, they should be aware that a lender may be using a very different score in making a credit decision.”

The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act directed the CFPB to compare credit scores sold to creditors and those sold to consumers by nationwide credit bureaus and to determine whether differences between those scores harm consumers.

Today’s study analyzes credit scores from 200,000 credit files from each of the following credit bureaus: TransUnion, Equifax, and Experian.  It is a follow-up to a study the Bureau released in July 2011 that described the credit scoring industry, the types of credit scores, and the potential problems for consumers that could result from differences between the scores they purchase and the scores creditors use.

The study released today determined:

  • One out of five consumers would likely receive a meaningfully different score than would a creditor: When consumers purchase their score from a credit bureau, the score they receive may be meaningfully different from the score that a lender would consult in making a decision.A meaningful difference means that the consumer would be likely to qualify for different credit offers – either better or worse – than they would expect to get based on the score they purchased. 
  • Score discrepancies may generate consumer harm:  When discrepancies exist between the scores consumers purchase and the scores used for decision-making by lenders in the marketplace, consumers may take action that does not benefit them.  For example, consumers who have reviewed their own score may expect a certain price from a lender, may waste time and effort applying for loans they are not qualified for, or may accept offers that are worse than they could get.
  • Consumers unlikely to know about score discrepancies:  There is no way for consumers to know how the score they receive will compare to the score a creditor uses in making a lending decision.  As such, consumers cannot exclusively rely on the credit score they receive to understand how lenders will view their creditworthiness.

What to do

The Bureau recommends that consumers consider the following in evaluating the credit score they receive:

  • Shop around for credit.  Consumers benefit by shopping for credit.  Regardless of the scores different lenders use, they may offer different loan terms because they operate different risk models or face different competitive pressures.   Consumers should not rule out of seeking lower priced credit because of assumptions they make about their credit score.  While some consumers are reluctant to shop for credit out of fear that they will harm their credit score, that negative impact may be overblown.  Inquiries generally do not result in a large reduction in a consumer credit score. 
  • Check the credit report for accuracy and dispute errors.  Credit scores are calculated based on information in a consumer’s credit file.  Inaccurate information may be the difference between a consumer being approved or denied a loan.  Before shopping for major credit items, the Bureau recommends that consumers review their credit files for inaccuracies.   Each of the nationwide credit bureaus is required by law to provide credit reports for free to consumers who request them once every 12 months. 

The Bureau will begin supervising consumer reporting agencies as of September 30, 2012.  The CFPB’s supervisory authority will cover an estimated 30 companies that account for about 94 percent of the market’s annual receipts. 

The Bureau’s examiners will be looking to verify that consumer reporting companies are complying with federal consumer financial law, including that the companies are using and providing accurate information, handling consumer disputes, making disclosures available, and preventing fraud and identity theft.

Many consumers spend good money subscribing to services that supposedly give them factual information about their credit score. But a study released today...

Article Image

Discover Ordered to Pay $200 Million for Deceptive Marketing

The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) and the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) have ordered Discover Bank to refund approximately $200 million to more than 3.5 million consumers and pay a $14 million civil money penalty.  This action results from an investigation started by the FDIC, which the CFPB joined last year. 

The joint investigation concerned deceptive telemarketing and sales tactics used by Discover to mislead consumers into paying for various credit card “add-on products” – payment protection, credit score tracking, identity theft protection, and wallet protection.

The agencies jointly determined that Discover engaged in deceptive telemarketing tactics to sell the company’s credit card add-on products.  Payment Protection was marketed as a product that allows consumers to put their payments on hold for up to two years in the event of unemployment, hospitalization, or other qualifying life events. 

Discover also sold its Credit Score Tracker, designed to allow a customer unlimited access to his or her credit reports and credit score.  The third product wasIdentity Theft Protection, which was marketed as providing daily credit monitoring. 

Lastly, Discover’s Wallet Protection product was sold as a service to help a consumer cancel credit cards in the event that his or her wallet is stolen.

Telemarketing scripts

Consumers rate Discover
Discover’s telemarketing scripts contained misleading language likely to deceive consumers about whether they were actually purchasing a product.  Discover’s telemarketers also often downplayed key terms and spoke quickly during the part of the call in which the prices and terms of the add-on products were disclosed.  Because of the misleading language in thescripts and the actions of Discover’s telemarketers, consumers were: 

  • Misled about the fact that there was a charge for the products: Discover’s telemarketing scripts often used language implying that the products were additional free “benefits,” rather than products for which a fee would be applied to their accounts. 

  • Misled about whether they had purchased the products:The telemarketing scripts frequently suggested that consumers would not be charged for the products until after having a chance to review printed materials from Discover.  Discover, however, did not provide consumers with the information until after Discover had already initiated the consumer’s purchase of a product.

  • Enrolled without their consent:Discover representatives processed the add-on product purchases without some consumers’ consent.  These consumers were then charged for the product on their Discover card.

  • Withheld material information about eligibility requirements for certain benefits:Discover’s telemarketers typically did not disclose critical eligibility requirements for certain payment protection benefits, such as exclusions for pre-existing medical conditions and certain limitations concerning employment.

Discover agrees 

Under the order, Discover has agreed to: 

  • Stop deceptive marketing: Discover is required to institute certain changes to its telemarketing of these products that are designed to ensure that these unlawful acts do not occur again.  Discover has also agreed to submit a compliance plan to the FDIC and the CFPB for approval, and to take specific corrective actions related to the products. 

  • Pay restitution to consumers who purchased the products: Discover will pay approximately $200 million in restitution to more than 3.5 million consumers who were charged for one or more of the products between December 1, 2007 and August 31, 2011.  Generally, all consumers affected by Discover’s deceptive practices regarding these products, except those who affirmatively made use of Payment Protection, will receive restitution, with amounts varying depending on when they purchased, and how long they held, the add-on products.  All consumers will receive at least 90 days’ worth of fees paid (minus any refunds they have already received), with approximately 2 million consumers receiving full restitution of all of the fees they paid (minus any refunds they have already received).

  • Provide refunds or credits without any further action by consumers: Consumers are not required to take any action to receive their credit or check. If an affected consumer is still a Discover customer, he or she will receive a credit to his or her account.  If an affected consumer is no longer a Discover credit card holder, the consumer will receive a check in the mail or have any outstanding balance reduced by the amount of the refund. 

  • Submit to an independent audit: Compliance with the restitution terms of the order will be assured through the work of an independent auditor, who will report to the FDIC and the CFPB on Discover’s compliance with the joint FDIC-CFPB Consent Order.

  • Pay a $14 million penalty: The FDIC and the CFPB imposed civil money penalties of $14 million.  Discover will pay $7 million of that penalty to the U.S. Treasury and $7 million to the CFPB’s Civil Penalty Fund. 

The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) and the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) have ordered Discover Bank to refund ap...

Article Image

Survey Suggests Students Handling Credit Card Debt

College loan debt may be sky high but the image of college students running up huge credit card balances may be unfair. A new survey suggests that, when it comes to handling credit card debt, college students may be doing a better job than their parents.

In its survey, CreditDonkey asked college students if they felt “responsible” enough to use a credit card. Not surprisingly, 85 percent said they did. Only 15 percent confessed to being unable to handle plastic.

Thirty percent of college students said they got their first credit card at age 18, the age when most students go off to college. The recently-passed CARD Act has provisions to restrict credit card marketing to college students who, it was feared, would run up mountains of unaffordable debt.

Nearly a third have no card

The CreditDonkey survey suggests that isn't a problem, or at least it isn't anymore. In fact, 30 percent of college students polled said they did not have a single credit card.

A major problem with credit cards is that consumers often run up their balances, intending to pay them down in the future, but find they are never able to do so. As a result, they suddenly find themselves with balances of several thousand dollars and, at credit cards' high interest rates, it is all they can do to keep up with the interest payments.

The survey suggests college students have yet to fall into that trap. When asked how much they pay on their credit card bill each month, a surprising 42 percent said they paid off the balance each month. Only 17 percent confessed to paying just the minimum each month.

Prefer debit cards

Sixty percent of college students questioned in the survey said they use their debit card rather than a debit card for everyday expenses, another sound financial habit. The biggest use of credit cards, according to the survey, was to pay for text books, which can run hundreds of dollars a semester.

Many of the students expressed concern about college loan debt and were mindful of ways to minimize it. Seventy-eight percent were aware that college loan debt cannot be discharged in bankruptcy.

"College students' confidence in their ability to manage debt may be well-founded, especially when compared to the baby boomers, who, in recent years, have become synonymous with high debt," said Charles Tran, founder of CreditDonkey.com.

Recently, a majority of boomers between 50 and 64 surveyed by the AARP said that they feel anxious about whether they can afford to retire, thanks both to high levels of debt and low levels of assets.

College loan debt may be sky high but the image of college students running up huge credit card balances may be unfair. A new survey suggests that, when it...

Article Image

Finding the Right Prepaid Card Isn't Easy

Prepaid cards are still a new specimen and consumers are often uncertain about how to deal with them. A new report from the Pew Charitable Trusts highlights some of the most common concerns.

Pew researchers looked at 52 prepaid cards that made up 75 percent of the market in 2011 and found that:

  • The varying fee structures and disclosures for prepaid cards make comparison shopping very difficult because most products have 7 to 15 individual fees to consider and their disclosures are not uniform.
  • The cost of prepaid cards can be less than checking accounts, but the cards come with significant risks. These products are not covered by laws requiring disclosure of fees and terms - nor those that limit consumer liability for unauthorized electronic fund transfers.
  • Most consumers use prepaid cards as a way to keep spending within their means; overdraft options run counter to this goal and should not be offered.
  • FDIC insurance does not necessarily apply to funds loaded onto GPR prepaid cards. Those companies that claim funds are FDIC-insured are not federally supervised and, therefore there is no guarantee the protections are executed correctly.

ConsumerAffairs found about 130,000 consumer comments about prepaid cards on social media sites like Facebook and Twitter over the last year. A computerized sentiment analysis of those comments finds net sentiment plummeting from 72% to just 36% in the last 12 months, presumably as consumers gain experience with the good -- and bad -- aspects of the cards.

Starsky of Cranston, RI, is one consumer who has learned to be wary of prepaid cards.

"I had enough funds on the card to make an iTunes transaction. When iTunes submitted the payment request, Green Dot refused payment after they already approved it. Do prepaid cards not have to follow regulations of "Must Pay Items"? Now my iTunes account is frozen until funds are paid. When I worked for a bank, this was deemed as illegal: to not pay a 'Must Pay Item' when there was prior payment approval by the financial institution," Starsky said.

It's not just consumers who are learning to be wary of prepaid cards. We recently heard from Paul of Manitou Springs, Colo.: "I am a hotel owner. A customer charged $678.09 in room charges which was later debited from our account as a charge-back for insufficient funds. This happened 33 (thirty-three) days after the transaction was processed and despite the fact that an authorization number was obtained for this transaction at the time it was processed. I got nothing but runaround from Green Dot."

The full text of the Pew study is available online. 

Regulation pending

The cards may eventually be more tightly regulated than they are now. The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) is drafting rules but the timetable for enactment is unclear.

The CFPB said in May that its rulemaking will focus on “General Purpose Reloadable” prepaid cards which allow consumers to load the cards with money upfront and use them as if they were checking account debit cards. 

According to a 2009 FDIC study, 9.7 percent of all households used these prepaid cards.  It is projected that the total dollar amount loaded onto prepaid cards will hit $167 billion in 2014.

"The people who use prepaid cards are, in many instances, the most vulnerable among us,” said CFPB Director Richard Cordray. “All consumers need, and deserve, products which are safe and whose costs and risks are clear upfront.  Yet right now prepaid cards have far fewer regulatory protections than bank accounts or debit or credit cards.  That’s why we are launching a rulemaking to promote safety and transparency in this emerging market.”

Consumers rate Green Dot Prepaid Cards

Consumer groups have urged the CFPB to ban overdraft and credit featureson the cards. 

“The most important step that the CFPB can take to ensure that prepaid cards fulfill their promise, and to prevent unfair, deceptive or abusive practices, is to ensure that prepaid cards are true to their essence as a prepaid transaction product,” according to comments submitted by the Center for Responsible Lending, the National Consumer Law Center and the Consumer Federation of America.

Prepaid cards are still a new specimen and consumers are often uncertain about how to deal with them. A new report from the Pew Charitable Trusts highlight...

Article Image

Best Buy Customer Clicked Box Agreeing to Terms; Case Dismissed

We all click those little boxes saying we "agree to the terms and conditions." Well, guess what -- that action has consequences, as a the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed when it upheld a lower court's dismissal of a proposed class action lawsuit against the consumer retailer and HSBC Bank.

The suit charged that the retailer and the bank had failed to properly disclose a $59 annual fee in advertisements and applications for the Reward Zone Program MasterCard.

Though lead plaintiff Gary Davis could have canceled the card the avoid the fee, he instead refused to activate it and continued to pay the annual fee for five years, Courthouse News Service reported.

U.S. District Judge George King dismissed the Los Angeles case, and a three-judge appeals panel unanimously affirmed on Friday. He noted that neither Best Buy's online application nor its advertisements violated federal disclosure laws. Furthermore, whatever alleged harm Davis suffered could have been easily avoided.

"The advertisement contained the disclaimer, 'other restrictions may apply,' which would have motivated a reasonable consumer to consult the terms and conditions," Judge Dorothy Nelson wrote for the appeals court. "If that were not enough, the online application used boldface and oversized font to alert Davis to the Important Terms & Disclosure Statement, instructing him to 'read the notice below carefully.'"

Additionally, Judge Nelson noted that Davis had checked a box indicating his assent to the terms and conditions.  She noted that Davis could have received a refund of the annual fee if he canceled the card within 90 days.

"Because Davis failed to read the terms and conditions before agreeing to them, and because he refused to cancel his card within 90 days, even when viewing the facts in Davis's favor, we must conclude that any harm he suffered was the product of his own behavior, not the advertisements," Nelson wrote. 

We all click those little boxes saying we "agree to the terms and conditions." Well, guess what -- that action has consequences, as a the 9th U.S. Cir...

Article Image

Telemarketer Making Refunds to 4,400 Consumers

The Federal Trade Commission is mailing refund checks to 4,468 consumers nationwide who allegedly were defrauded by a telemarketer who used robocalls to pitch worthless credit card rate reduction programs for an up-front fee. Each consumer will receive a check for between $31 and $1,300, based on how much money he or she lost in the scam.

The refunds stem from the July 2010 judgment in one of several cases the FTC brought against defendants that made illegal robocalls to consumers, using names including "Heather from card services" and "client services."

According to the FTC, the defendants in this case claimed that they could lower the interest rates on consumers' credit cards – for an up-front fee that typically ranged from $990 to $1,495.

The defendants also falsely stated that consumers who did not save the "guaranteed" amount – typically $4,000 or more – could get a full refund of the up-front fee. However, after consumers paid the fee, the defendants did little to negotiate better terms on their behalf and refused refunds to consumers who were dissatisfied with their services.

Consumers who receive the checks should cash them within 60 days of the date they were issued. The redress checks are valid for 60 days from the date they are issued. The FTC never requires the payment of money up front, or the provision of additional information, before consumers cash redress checks issued to them. Consumers with questions should call the redress hotline at 1-866-224-5404.

The Federal Trade Commission is mailing refund checks to 4,468 consumers nationwide who allegedly were defrauded by a telemarketer who used robocalls ...

Article Image

Consumers Increase Credit Cards But Paying Loans on Time

Two new reports on consumer credit usage may constitute positive signs for the economy. On one hand consumers have increased the number of their open credit card accounts and on the other they are doing a better job of paying their car loans on time.

Equifax, one of the three credit reporting agencies, says the number of open retail credit card accounts exceeded 175 million in July for the first time since December 2009, when the economy was in the early stages of recovery. That reverses a trend of fewer accounts, as credit card issuers unilaterally closed many cardholders' accounts in 2009 and 2010.

Now, it appears as though lending standards have relaxed, resulting in the origination of some 13.8 million new retail card accounts year-to-date through May 2012. That represents a 10 percent increase over January – May 2011 totals.

"The economic recovery is increasing both demand for new credit cards and the supply of credit," said Equifax Chief Economist Amy Crews Cutts. "However, while consumers are seeking new credit card accounts, they are not increasing their use of that newly available credit as fast. Utilization rates of card limits continue to fall, and, additionally, we are seeing increasing payment ratios at the same time."

On-time payments improve

In fact, delinquency rates among retail cards in July 2012 saw a nearly 15 percent decrease from the same time a year ago. Delinquency rates on other types of consumer loans are falling as well.

The biggest improvement in on-time payments is for auto loans, according to an analysis by Loans.net. Delinquent auto loans are the lowest in 10 years. A year ago at this time, the total of outstanding loans in arrears was 25 percent higher.

"Banks are starting to approve auto loans again in record numbers," the company said in a statement. "There are even some lenders that are now approving bad credit car loans as well. Loan comparison Websites have seen a huge rush in traffic in just the past few months."

Two new reports on consumer credit usage may constitute positive signs for the economy. On one hand consumers have increased the number of their open credi...

Article Image

Best Credit Cards For College Students

With student loan debt mounting, the last thing a college student needs to do is run up a lot of credit card debt on top of it.

In fact, when Congress reformed credit card laws in 2009, it specifically regulated how credit cards could be marketed to college students. But that doesn't necessarily mean a college student shouldn't have a credit card.

Odysseas Papadimitriou, CEO of Card Hub, says a credit card in the hands of a college student can be a positive experience, as long as they're smart and choose the right card.

Build inexpensive credit

In looking for the right credit card, he says a student’s top priority should be to build credit as inexpensively as possible. As a result, Card Hub’s selections for the Best Credit Cards for College Students in 2012 -- which were developed after analysis of over 1,000 credit card offers -- includes mostly cards without annual fees.

The only thing better than a card with no annual fee is a card that provides rewards. Students who are confident that they will be able to pay their credit card bills in full each and every month should focus on finding cards that, on average, provide more than one percent cash back on all purchases.

Three cards fit that bill nicely. The Citi Forward Card for College Students provides five points per $1 spent on entertainment and at restaurants. It provides one point per $1 in spending on everything else, 100 bonus points each month you stay below your credit limit and pay your bill on time, and 1,000 bonus points for signing up for paperless statements during the first three months.

The Journey Student Rewards from Capital One pays 1.25 percent cash back on all purchases when you pay your bill on time and no fee for foreign transactions, great for students studying abroad.

The Citi Dividend Platinum Select Card for College Students pays five percent cash back on supermarket, drugstore, gas station and utilities purchases for 6 months and one percent thereafter. It also pays two percent on rotating spending categories and one percent on everything else.

Do a little homework

“There are a number of attractive student rewards credit cards on the market and deciding between them necessitates considering their value through the prism of your lifestyle,” Papadimitriou said. “It’s tempting to simply opt for whichever card offers the most points, miles, or cash back, but if earning them necessitates signing up for rotating spending categories when you know you’ll forget to do so, or the best rewards aren’t being linked to the things you spend the most money on, another card might be preferable.”

Gone are the days of credit card marketers signing up students at football tailgate parties. Thanks to the CARD Act, consumers under age 21 have to jump through a number of hoops to get a credit card. If you're going to go to all that trouble, you might as well get a card that works to your advantage.

With student loan debt mounting, the last thing a college student needs to do is run up a lot of credit card debt on top of it.In fact, when Congress ref...

Article Image

AT&T iPhone Users Face Restrictions on FaceTime

Current iPhone owners can use the product's video FaceTime feature if they are accessing the Internet through a Wi-Fi connection. But when Apple issues the next update of its iOS, the iPhone will be capable of making these video calls using their carrier's cell signal.

All of a sudden carriers could see a big jump in bandwidth demand from iPhone users. AT&T has let it be known that, once the new operating system is out there, only AT&T iPhones on a shared data plan will be able to use the carrier signal for video calls. Those still on the older, unlimited data plans will have to continue using Wi-Fi.

Data drain

The reasoning is understandable. Those on a shared data plan have a fixed amount of bandwidth to use during each billing cycle. AT&T doesn't really care how customers use it.

But customers on the grandfathered unlimited data plans could significantly increase network demands if they are able to make unlimited video calls. While it's not hard to understand AT&T's reasoning, the public interest group Public Knowledge says it doesn't make it right. In fact, the group says it might not even be legal.

"By blocking FaceTime for many of its customers, AT&T is violating the FCC's Open Internet rules,” said John Bergmayer, Senior Staff Attorney at Public Knowledge. “These rules state that mobile providers shall not 'block applications that compete with the provider's voice or video telephony services.' Although carriers are permitted to engage in 'reasonable network management,' there is no technical reason why one data plan should be able to access FaceTime, and another not.”

Cutting into revenue

Bergmayer says “over-the-top” communications services like FaceTime are a threat to carriers' revenue, but the companies should respond by competing with these services and not by engaging in discriminatory behavior. AT&T says it isn't an issue because all iPhone users can continue to use Wi-Fi for FaceTime.

FaceTime is Apple's system for two-way video calling, allowing users to talk to each other face-to-face from an iPhone, iPad or Mac. The calls are made over an Internet connection and most of these connections are wired and unlimited. Cell networks are more limited and carriers, in recent years, have begun to look for way in which to limit usage as the proliferation of smartphones has greatly increased data demand.

Over the summer both Verizon Wireless and AT&T have moved to shared data plans, requiring all new customers to choose a measured amount of bandwidth that they can use during a billing cycle. Both companies hope to eventually eliminate most grandfathered unlimited plans, requiring these customers to move to a shared plan when they purchase a new subsidized phone.

Current iPhone owners can use the product's video FaceTime feature if they are accessing the Internet through a Wi-Fi connection. But when Apple issues the...

Article Image

Square Unveils Plan That Eliminates Swipe Fees

Square seems to be on a roll. Less than a week after closing a blockbuster deal with Starbucks for mobile payments, it's fired another warning shot across the bow of credit card processors.

Any business that does $250,000 a year in credit card transactions can eliminate the 2.75 percent swipe fee and pay a flat fee of $275 a month. For a business doing just the minimum $250,000 in credit charges a year, it's a savings of about $3,000 a year.

Square made credit card acceptance more accessible for small and micro businesses with its small card reader that plugs into a smartphone. Any business, anywhere could accept credit and debit cards with the device and pay a 2.75 percent swipe fee.

Its new pricing plan, the company says, will give small businesses a big advantage when it comes to lowering the cost of accepting a credit card.

“For 62 years, merchants have suffered complicated, expensive processing fees,” said Square CEO and co-founder Jack Dorsey. “Square is the first company to rethink electronic payment pricing with the merchant in mind. We are giving merchants affordable, predictable pricing. With one monthly price, merchants know that the sales they’ve processed in a day is the same amount deposited in the bank.”

Square was founded in 2009 in San Francisco and its services currently are only available to businesses in the U.S. It's an upstart competitor in an industry dominated by Visa, MasterCard and American Express.

Square seems to be on a roll. Less than a week after closing a blockbuster deal with Starbucks for mobile payments, it's fired another warning shot across ...

Article Image

How Long Will it Take to Pay Off Your Credit Card?

If you are like most consumers, you carry a credit card balance. Never mind how you acquired it, you'd really like to pay it off but don't seem to be making much progress.

Do you want to know how long the payoff process will take? You may think you do but you may also quickly learn why economics is called “the dismal science.”

You credit card bill arrives each month showing new charges, the interest on the balance, the new balance, with the addition of the new charges and the interest, and a minimum payment you are required to make to keep the account current.

Helpful calculator

To pay down your balance you need a payment plan that you can stick to. The Federal Reserve provides a Credit Card Repayment Calculator that is a handy tool in developing your plan.

For starters, let's assume that you owe $15,450 and your interest rate is 21.9 percent ARR. We'll assume you make no more charges on the card but you only make the minimum payment. After entering those figures we hit “calculate” and get the following message from the calculator:

  • $309 Estimated Initial Minimum Monthly Payment
  • Amount of time to pay off your balance: 142 years
  • Amount of interest you will pay in that time: $152,387

And that assumes you make your payments on time each month and don't rack up any late fees.

An eternity

Why in the world would it take 142 years? Because, your minimum payment – based on two percent of your monthly balance – will go down slightly each month because your balance will go down slightly. But if you just pay what the credit card company tells you is the minimum, you are putting less money each month toward the principal.

After that eye-opening exercise, let's see what happens if you pay that same $309 each month until the balance is paid off. Even though your minimum payment goes down each month, you keep paying $309. According to the calculator, it takes eleven years to pay off the balance, shaving off 131 years!

You can see why you should always pay more than the minimum due if you want to pay off your balance. The calculator will also tell you how much you should pay each month if you want to pay down the balance is a specific period of time. Using it, or one like it, can help you develop a plan to get out of debt.

If you are like most consumers, you carry a credit card balance. Never mind how you acquired it, you'd really like to pay it off but don't seem to be makin...

Article Image

Higher One Inc. Will Pay $11 Million To College Students For Disputed Fees

Higher One Inc., which provides financial services for colleges, will soon pay $11 million to 60,000 students in a settlement. The financial institution has been accused of charging questionable service fees.

The company, based in New Haven, Conn., enables students to electronically keep track of their financial aid amounts, and extract funds by use of a debit card called the OneAccount card.

Upon each swipe or ATM use, Higher One charged students 50 cents per transaction fee, which diminishing the amount of the financial aid award that students rely on for tuition and other pertinent expenses.

Critics said Higher One charged students multiple fees for only one transaction, and allowed overdraft penalties to linger without notifying students.

This allowed the financial institution to continually tack on overdraft charges, which the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) charged was deceptive. The government agency has since told Higher One it must present its rules and penalty fees in a clearer and less deceptive way.

The consumer protection group US PIRG said the settlement should be a sign for other colleges that use Higher One, to fully understand what they're signing up for when hiring out these types of companies.

The advocacy group also said colleges should forbid any financial institution from charging service fees that ultimately diminish the financial aid amount, and take away the ability of students to make consistent tuition payments.

Piggy bank

“Student aid should not be a piggy bank for banks to dip into especially when their practices are unfair or deceptive,” said US PIRG rep Rich Williams. “We urge colleges to insist if they partner with Higher One or any other bank or firm to disburse financial aid or provide campus services, that contracts prohibit onerous fees and other unfair practices.”

Higher One said it has student’s best interest first in mind.

“We believe the relatively low civil money penalty imposed reflects how seriously we take our commitment to our customer, the degree of the issue, and our level of cooperation with FDIC,” it said.

In addition Higher One will pay $110,000 on top of the $11 million, and Bancorp Bank, which provides the debit cards, will also pay $172,000 to students in the settlement.

Going forward, Higher One will not charge penalties for accounts that have insufficient funds for more than a 60-day period.

Students who are eligible for the refund are those who started using the OneAccount card from July 16, 2008 until the institution officially said it would stop charging such fees in December of 2011.

Unfairly penalized

The settlement concludes ongoing complaints from colleges and students alike that have long accused Higher One of unfairly penalizing students by way of 12 different fees the institution uses.

And with college students being among the least financially stable  consumers, the penalty costs hits them harder than it would regular bank customers, who are more established, and usually know more about bank costs, critics said.

Before the settlement was reached, Miles Lasater, Higher One's founder and CEO, said students should research and become familiar with all of the company's fees before using the card or taking out money.

Higher One also said it would waive $6 million in penalty fees that students owed the company before the FDIC stepped in. In addition to the settlement, the FDIC said Higher One will no longer charge more than three non-sufficient fund fees during one day.

Higher One has contracts with 520 campuses and service about 4.3 million students, according to a U.S PIRG report, entitled “The Campus Debit Card Trap.”

The report focuses on the bad aspects of colleges and universities that outsource their financial aid management to institutions. It goes on to say while these types of agreements benefit the school by helping them manage funds, they often impact the student in a negative way.

What to do

Read the report

The Campus Debit Card report also outlines what schools need to do to ensure their students aren’t being taken advantage of by financial institutions. Like providing students with alternate banks to use that’s not contracted by the school.

The report suggests that schools need to negotiate with banks and institutions to remove all debit card fees before working with them.

Also, if the school decides to use a company like Higher One, colleges shouldn’t be advertising to students about the debit cards or any other services offered, the report said.

Marketing debit cards to students can lead them to make unnecessary commitments before researching other options, the report found.

Higher One Inc., which provides financial services for colleges, will soon pay $11 million to 60,000 students in a settlement. The financial inst...

Article Image

Judge Faults 'Flaws' in Credit Card Collection Suits

Whether it's mortgages or credit cards, when banks have a large number of bad loans to process, stressed out employees can take shortcuts and mistakes can happen.

In the mortgage industry it was the "robo-signing" scandal, in which people were hired to sign bankers' names to foreclosure documents without so much as reading them. It resulted in a massive settlement between the five largest mortgage lenders and the states.

Could something similar be occurring with credit card debt? A report by TheNew York Times says major credit card companies, trying to process a rising number of bad loans, are filing lawsuits against consumers without always having their facts and procedures straight.

In fact, the Times quotes one judge as saying as many as 90 percent of credit card-related lawsuits are "flawed." Complaints from consumers suggest there could be something to that.

Complaints

"American Express is attempting to collect $2,537 that was discharged by AMEX as a charge off over 15 years ago," Kenneth, of San Bernadino, Calif., wrote in a post at ConsumerAffairs. "This is the first I've heard from them in over 15 years."

Michael, of Monterey, Calif., complains that American Express referred his account to collections even though he was making the agreed-upon payments on time.

"When I went ahead and paid off the balance through their website, although the account was ostensibly in collections, they refused to send me evidence that I had paid off the account until I pointed out that the law required them to do so," Michael wrote in a ConsumerAffairs post. "I had to specifically ask for a closing statement before they complied. They had no reason for referring my account to collections, as it was current."

What to do

According to the Times reports, credit card lenders increasingly are trying to collect money from consumers who have already paid or settled their debt. Many consumers, who lack the money to hire a lawyer to represent them, feel helpless.

Consumers who find themselves defendants in a collection lawsuit or being pressed for payments they don't owe should complain to federal regulators who have oversight of credit card lenders. A good place to start is the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC). The OCC's consumer complaint page is located here.

Whether it's mortgages or credit cards, when banks have a large number of bad loans to process, stressed out employees can take shortcuts and mistakes can ...

Article Image

Right Credit Card Can Make Back to School Less Expensive

Back-to-school is a time for extra spending, not just on books and backpacks but shoes and clothing as well. Many parents will reach for a credit card, but which one?

CardHub, a financial site that analyzes credit card products, reports some credit cards are more helpful to parents than others when it comes to back-to-school purchases. It found that signing up for some cards can help shoppers save as much as $400 with initial bonuses. Some provide as much as six percent off on an ongoing basis.

For the best initial bonus, CardHub suggests the Chase Sapphire Preferred Card. It provides 40,000 bonus points, redeemable for $400 in cash or $500 in travel, for spending $3,000 during the first three months and does not charge an annual fee during the first year. After that, however, it's $95 a year.

Signing bonus

“If you simply want to get a few hundred extra dollars with which to buy school supplies or replenish your financial reserves following this extremely busy shopping season, then a card offering a lucrative initial bonus is the best choice,” said Card Hub CEO Odysseas Papadimitriou. “Keep in mind that you’ll need excellent credit in order to get true value, and you might not want to keep this card open past the first year given that a $95 annual fee kicks in on your first-year anniversary.”

The Target Store Card, meanwhile, offers five percent cash back at Target stores and at Target.com. There's no annual fee and, as an added bonus, Target donates one percent of all your purchases to the K-12 school of your choice. The drawback is the card can only be used at Target.

What's the best all-around card? CardHub bestows the honor on the Blue Cash Preferred Card from American Express. It provides six percent cash back at supermarkets, three percent at department stores and gas stations and one percent everywhere else. If you spend $1000 in the first three months, it provides a bonus of $150.

You'll need good credit

“Extremely lucrative rewards are typically only available to people with above-average credit, and the best all-around credit cards for back-to-school shopping aren’t outliers,” Papadimitriou said. “Assuming that you meet this requirement, the Blue Cash Preferred Card from American Express and the PenFed Platinum Rewards Card are both great options because they offer attractive initial bonuses in addition to excellent ongoing rewards for purchases made at supermarkets and gas stations. Not only are gas and groceries most folks’ biggest everyday expenses, but you can also get most school supplies at major supermarkets these days.”

Meanwhile, many states are ready to help make back-to-school shopping a little less painful for consumers. States will declare a sales tax “holiday” on school supplies for much of the month of August. Some holidays will begin as early as this weekend.

Back-to-school is a time for extra spending, not just on books and backpacks but shoes and clothing as well. Many parents will reach for a credit card, but...

Article Image

Credit Card Could Provide Extra Warranty Coverage

Here's another reason not to pay for an extended warranty. The credit card you use to purchase the product may already provide one at no extra charge.

First, let's take a look at so-called extended warranties but which are in reality service contracts. When you buy electronics or a major appliance, you can be sure the salesperson will push hard for you to also get the extended warranty.

According to a study from the University of Maryland, 31 percent of consumers opt for the extended warranty each year, spending around $1.6 billion. According to Business Week, extended warranties provide about three to four percent of a company's revenue but translate into as much as 50 percent of its profits. Why? Because many claims are never made or claims are made but denied.

Money wasters

As a result, CardHub says extended warranties are generally regarded as being among the biggest money wasters for consumers, and the ability to receive extra coverage at no cost through one’s credit card can provide a valuable source of savings.

When using a credit card to make a purchase, the card network, not the credit card company itself, provides the benefit. Visa, MasterCard, Discover and American Express all offer some level of extended warranty coverage for products purchased with their cards.

According to CardHub's study, all four major card networks extend original manufacturer’s warranties for up to one year for at least certain cardholder segments and will cover amounts up to $10,000. American Express’ extended warranty policy received a 90 percent rating, the highest cumulative score in this study. Discover finished second at 80 percent, MasterCard came in third at 71 percent, and Visa placed last with a rating of 67 percent.

The study also found that Discover and American Express are the only networks that provide coverage to all cardholders and that Discover used to be the only network that required cardholders to purchase extended warranty protection but has since upgraded to an improved policy that is free for all cardholders.

Exceptions

There are some exceptions to the coverage. MasterCard is the only network that excludes physical damage to an item from its coverage and none of the four networks provide a product warranty on items that lack an existing manufacturer’s warranty. In other words, if the manufacturer doesn't stand behind the product, the credit card network won't either.

Also, if you are buying a refurbished products, such as a computer or TV set, use your American Express card. American Express is the only network that provides coverage on refurbished products.

The best part for the consumer, besides this feature being free, none of the networks’ extended warranty programs require sign up or product registration. All you have to do is purchase the product with your credit card. Consumers must keep their purchase receipts in order to be eligible for an extended warranty under each of the networks’ programs.

It will be up to the card network administrator to decide whether the product that is the subject of a claim will be repaired, replaced or refunded. You should call your credit card company to find out the best way to submit your claim.

Here's another reason not to pay for an extended warranty. The credit card you use to purchase the product may already provide one at not extra charge.Fi...

Article Image

Walmart, Target Oppose $6 Billion Credit Card Deal

Walmart and Target are joining convenience store operators and many consumers in opposing a proposed $6 billion settlement between credit companies, banks and retailers.

Under the settlement, which must still be approved by a judge, retailers, who will split the $6 billion settlement, will be allowed to charge customers more for paying with credit cards -- something the card issuers have long prohibited and consumers generally oppose.

"I will not stand for this and [will] just pay cash then or leave the store. Consumers have to stand up," said Nicole Swopes of Lake Forest, Ill., responding to a ConsumerAffairs story on the settlement. Seconding the sentiment was Steve Brienen, who said: "As Usual the real pain will be in the backside of the consumer no matter how this turns out. Using a credit card will cost us more one way or the other."

The retailers agree, or at least say they do.

“Walmart, along with a growing number of consumer groups and merchants, is disappointed in the proposed credit card interchange fee settlement," Walmart said in a statement. It said the settlement would not prohibit credit card networks from "continually increasing hidden swipe fees, which already cost consumers tens of billions of dollars each year."

Walmart said the settlement would also hamper payments innovation, such as paying for purchases with a smartphone or other device.

"As Walmart continues to seek reform that will provide transparency and true competition among financial institutions, we encourage all merchants to put consumers first and reject the settlement,” the statement concluded.

Consumer spin

Target also put a consumer spin on its opposition.

"Target believes the proposed interchange fee settlement is bad for both retailers and consumers," the company said. "Target has no interest in surcharging guests who use credit and debit cards in order to allow VISA and MasterCard to continue charging unfair fees."

Retailers who brought the long-simmering suit have claimed the swipe fees of 2% or more charged by the card companies are a "hidden tax" on consumers and have long pressed for the ability to pass along the swipe fee to consumers who choose to pay with credit cards -- in effect giving a discount to customers who pay with cash.

But the National Association of Convenience Stores (NACS), a class plaintiff in the lawsuit, was quick to say it rejects the agreement.

"Not only does the proposed settlement fail to introduce competition and transparency into a clearly broken market, it actually provides Visa and MasterCard with the tools to continue to shield swipe fees from market forces," said Tom Robinson, chairman of the group.

According to the convenience store group, the proposed settlement allows the card companies to continue to dictate the prices banks charge and the rules that constrain the market including for emerging payment methods, particularly mobile payments, arguments later echoed by Walmart and Target.


  Target believes the proposed interchange fee settlement is bad for both retailers and consumers. The proposed settlement would perpetuate a...

Article Image

Feds Urged To Ban Overdraft Fees On Prepaid Cards

Consumer groups submitting comments to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) for rules on prepaid credit cards urged the government watchdog to ban overdraft and credit features on the cards.

“The most important step that the CFPB can take to ensure that prepaid cards fulfill their promise, and to prevent unfair, deceptive or abusive practices, is to ensure that prepaid cards are true to their essence as a prepaid transaction product,” the groups said in their comments.

The comments were submitted by the Center for Responsible Lending, the National Consumer Law Center and the Consumer Federation of America.

Similar to debit cards

Prepaid cards work like debit cards. Consumers “load” them by depositing money to their accounts, much like they would do at a bank. In fact, prepaid cards are growing in popularity because so many consumers have stopped using banks to escape high fees. But prepaid cards come with plenty of fees of their own.

Now some prepaid card issuers are also offering credit features, which the consumer groups say is a bad idea, undermining the integrity of the prepaid card market and the safety of the consumers who use the cards.

“Prepaid cards users are vulnerable consumers, who want controls on overspending,” the groups said. “Prepaid card credit features are promoted for large or unexpected expenses but designed to be used routinely, encouraging a cycle of debt -- a practice that is especially pernicious since prepaid cards do not underwrite for ability to pay.”

The groups say banning overdraft fees and credit features will minimize account closures and protect access to transaction accounts.

Card features are changing

Theoretically, you shouldn't be able to overdraw your prepaid card because the spending limit should be determined by how much money is on the card. In the past, many cards didn't offer that feature. If you tried to spend money you didn't have, the card would be declined.

Some consumers actually closed their bank accounts and obtained prepaid cards for that very reason. Now, the consumer groups warn that feature is being undone by the addition of overdraft and credit features, which they argue are just expensive loans.

“Prepaid credit features will undo the elimination of rent-a-bank payday lending that was laboriously achieved a decade ago and be much more difficult to control if left to spread,” they warn. “Prepaid credit features are already being used to circumvent the law, but it is early enough to nip this trend in the bud.”

Evading the law

The groups charge credit on prepaid cards evades federal and state laws protecting public benefits and wages needed for necessities and protecting military service members. Prepaid cards with credit features are credit cards, they argue, but escape Truth In Lending's credit card protections.

CFPB asked for comments on prepaid cards in May, suggesting at the time that it viewed the evolving industry as a potential problem for consumers. The agency said its rulemaking will focus on “General Purpose Reloadable” prepaid cards which allow consumers to load the cards with money upfront and use them as if they were checking account debit cards.

According to a 2009 FDIC study, 9.7 percent of all households used these prepaid cards. Mercator Advisory Group reports that the prepaid market totals $57 billion and is expected to grow at a rate of 42 percent per year from 2010-2014. The two largest prepaid card program managers have reported a jump from 3.4 million active cards in 2009 to over 7 million this year. It is projected that the total dollar amount loaded onto prepaid cards will hit $167 billion in 2014.

Consumer groups submitting comments to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) for rules on prepaid credit cards urged the government watchdog to b...

Article Image

Capital One To Refund $140 Million to 2 Million Consumers

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) announced its first public enforcement action today -- and it is a big one.  The new agency has ordered  Capital One Bank to refund approximately $140 million to two million customers and pay an additional $25 million penalty. And another agency hit the bank with an additional $35 million penalty.

The action results from a CFPB examination that identified deceptive marketing tactics used by Capital One’s vendors to pressure or mislead consumers into paying for “add-on products” such as payment protection and credit monitoring when they activated their credit cards.

“Today’s action puts $140 million back in the pockets of two million Capital One customers who were pressured or misled into buying credit card products they didn’t understand, didn’t want, or in some cases, couldn’t even use,” said CFPB Director Richard Cordray. “We are putting companies on notice that these deceptive practices are against the law and will not be tolerated.”

Meanwhile, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency announced a $35 million penalty against Capital One for violations of section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) Act,

Deceptive tactics

Consumers rank Capital One

CFPB said that through its supervision process, CFPB’s examiners discovered Capital One’s call-center vendors engaged in deceptive tactics to sell the company’s credit card add-on products.  

These products included “payment protection,” which allows consumers to request that the bank cancel up to 12 months of minimum payments – roughly one percent of their credit card balance  if they encounter certain life events like unemployment and temporary disability.  It also provides debt forgiveness in the event of death or permanent disability. 

Another product was “credit monitoring,” with services such as identity-theft protection, access to “credit education specialists,” and, in some cases, daily monitoring and notification.

Consumers with low credit scores or low credit limits were offered these products by Capital One’s call-center vendors when they called to have their new credit cards activated.  As part of the high-pressure tactics Capital One representatives used to sell these add-on products, consumers were:

  • Misled about the benefits of the products: Consumers were sometimes led to believe that the product would improve their credit scores and help them increase the credit limit on their Capital One credit card.
  • Deceived about the nature of the products: Consumers were not always told that buying the products was optional.  In other cases, consumers were wrongly told they were required to purchase the product in order to receive full information about it, but that they could cancel the product if they were not satisfied. Many of these consumers later had difficulty canceling when they called to do so. 
  • Misled about eligibility: Although most of the payment protection benefits kicked in when consumers became disabled or lost a job, some call center representatives marketed and sold the product to ineligible unemployed and disabled consumers.  Despite paying the full fees, they could not get all the benefits of payment protection; some later filed claims that were denied because their “loss” (e.g. loss of job or onset of disability) occurred prior to enrollment
  • Misinformed about cost of the products: Consumers were sometimes led to believe that they would be enrolling in a free product rather than making a purchase.
  • Enrolled without their consent:Some call center vendors processed the add-on product purchases without the consumer’s consent.  Consumers were then automatically billed for the product and often had trouble cancelling the product when they called to do so. 
One of those who signed up for the payment protection plan on both his business and personal credit cards was Douglas of Austin, Texas, but in a complaint to ConsumerAffairs last month said the product turned out to be "a joke."
When he became ill and unemployed, Douglas said he called to activate the 12 months of payments and was told, "Don't worry. We will takae care of you." Instead, Douglas said, Capital One closed his business account and showed it as a bad-debt charge-off. Bank employees apologized but said there was nothing they could do, he said.
"Capital One acknowledged their error verbally; yet, they pin it on me by ruining my credit," Douglas concluded.

Enforcement Action

Pursuant to the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, the CFPB has the authority to issue Consent Orders and take action against institutions engaging in unfair, deceptive, or abusive practices. To ensure that all affected consumers are repaid and that consumers are no longer subject to these misleading and high-pressure tactics, Capital One has agreed to:

  • End deceptive marketing: Capital One has ceased all marketing of these products, and will not resume doing so until Capital One submits a compliance plan, acceptable to the Bureau, which helps ensure these unlawful acts do not occur in the future.  
  • Complete repayment, plus interest, to two million consumers: Capital One will pay approximately $140 million to all of the estimated two million consumers who either initially enrolled in a product on or after August 1, 2010, or who tried to cancel a product on or after August 1, 2010, but were persuaded to keep the product after speaking with a call-center representative.  In addition to the amount paid for the product, cardmembers will receive a refund of the associated finance charges, any over-the-limit fees resulting from the charge for the product, and interest. 
  • Pay claims denied based on ineligibility at enrollment: For any of these eligible consumers whose payment protection claims were previously denied because their loss occurred prior to enrollment (because of unemployment, disability, etc.), Capital One will pay their claims as if they had been eligible, if that amount is greater than the refund for that consumer. 
  • Convenient repayment for consumers: If the consumers are still Capital One customers, they will receive a credit to their accounts.  If they are no longer a Capital One credit card holder, they will receive a check in the mail.  Consumers are not required to take any action to receive their credit or check.
  • Independent audit: Compliance with the terms of this agreement will be assured through the work of an independent auditor, who will determine if Capital One has complied with the CFPB’s Consent Order.
  • $25 million penalty: Capital One will make a $25 million penalty payment to the CFPB’s Civil Penalty Fund.

Other banks warned 

Complaints received by the CFPB indicate – and the Bureau’s supervisory experience confirms – that other consumers have been misled by the marketing and sales practices associated with credit card add-on products. 

To further protect consumers, the Bureau is issuing a compliance bulletin that puts other institutions on notice that the CFPB will not tolerate deceptive marketing practices, and institutions will be held responsible for the actions of their third-party vendors.  Companies engaging in deceptive practices will be expected to refund fees paid by consumers and, particularly where practices are widespread, pay an appropriate penalty.

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) announced its first public enforcement action today -- and it is a big one. The new agency has ordered Ca...

Article Image

Convenience Stores Reject Swipe Fee Settlement

The headlines from Friday's “swipe fee” settlement between credit card companies and retailers casts it as a victory for retailers. At least one group of retailers doesn't see it that way.

The National Association of Convenience Stores (NACS), a class plaintiff in the lawsuit yielding a more than $6 billion settlement, says it rejects the agreement.

The settlement, which must still be approved by a federal judge, allows retailers to charge customers more if they pay with a credit card. MasterCard, Visa and major banks, including JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America and Wells Fargo, agreed to the huge payment to settle accusations they engaged in anti-competitive practices in payment processing. The dispute has dragged on for seven years.

"Our decision to settle is based on our belief that MasterCard and our stakeholders are best served by an amicable resolution," said Noah Hanft, MasterCard's general counsel.

Unmoved

But the NACS Board of Directors unanimously rejected the agreement, unmoved by the more than $6 billion.

"Not only does the proposed settlement fail to introduce competition and transparency into a clearly broken market, it actually provides Visa and MasterCard with the tools to continue to shield swipe fees from market forces," said NACS Chairman Tom Robinson, president of Santa Clara, Calif.-based Robinson Oil Corp.

According to the convenience store group, the proposed settlement allows the card companies to continue to dictate the prices banks charge and the rules that constrain the market including for emerging payment methods, particularly mobile payments.

Consumers and merchants to pay more?

“Consumers and merchants ultimately will pay more as a result of this agreement -- without any relief in sight," Robinson said.

The proposed settlement allows merchants to show consumers some of the costs of accepting credit cards, something they have been fighting for. But NACS says the agreement allows that disclosure only under very limited circumstances with strict oversight by Visa and MasterCard.

While news reports have noted the proposed settlement is the largest antitrust settlement in U.S. history, NACS says it only amounts to less than two months' worth of swipe fees, based on the estimated $50 billion in swipe fees collected by the credit card companies on an annual basis. Worse, the group says, there are no fundamental market changes that would constrain Visa and MasterCard from continuing to raise rates to a point where the net effect is to make merchants pay for their own settlement — and then some.

Larger goals

As a class plaintiff in the litigation, NACS pushed for a trial where it intended to argue that the anticompetitive practices engaged in by the credit card industry are illegal. NACS said it wants to force changes on credit card companies that it says would open the market to more competition.

"Even the monetary agreement in this proposal is a mirage," said Robinson. "Merchants won't get these funds for years and will have paid more than that through increased swipe fees long before they see those funds."

NACS made clear that it will do what it can to prevent the settlement from going forward but said it hopes other retailer groups will also reject it.

"There is plenty of time for merchants to make thoughtful decisions related to this proposed settlement,” said NACS President and CEO Henry Armour. We hope and expect that, as they have the time to review it, many other merchants including class representatives will decide to reject this proposal.”

The headlines from Friday's “swipe fee” settlement between credit card companies and retailers casts it as a victory for retailers. At least on...

Article Image

Consumers May Face Surcharges for Using Credit Cards

A seven-year dispute between retailers and credit card issuers over "swipe fees" has been settled. It will cost Visa and MasterCard $6 billion -- and may end up costing consumers a lot more than that.

Under the settlement, retailers, who will split the $6 billion, will be allowed to charge customers more for paying with credit cards -- something the card issuers have long prohibited.

The dispute between the retailers and the credit card and banking industries has been confusing to consumers, as both sides have put their spin on the issue.

Retailers have claimed the swipe fees of 2% or more charged by the card companies are a "hidden tax" on consumers and have long pressed for the ability to pass along the swipe fee to consumers who choose to pay with credit cards -- in effect giving a discount to customers who pay with cash.

The card companies have argued that consumers should have the choice of paying with cash or a credit or debit card and should not be penalized for choosing one method over another.

The legal arguments, however, had little to do with that and were built around antitrust and price-fixing allegations. There are, after all, only a handful of major national credit card brands and retailers said the card companies used their power to make merchants bow to their will.

Eye-popping

There are some eye-popping numbers in the settlement, thought to be the largest ever in a private antitrust case.  

Lawyers in the case had amassed a client list of 7 million American merchants who sued the card companies in 2005. The total value of the agreement is $7.25 billion, including a temporary reduction in card fees.

In the end, both sides claimed to be happy with the deal. Executives of Visa and MasterCard said the settlement was in the best interests of both parties. The Electronic Payments Coalition, an industry group, said the settlement contains important regulations that will prevent retailers from gouging consumers.

“As part of the settlement, retailers negotiated the ability to charge their customers a checkout fee (merchant surcharge) at the register," said the coalition said in a prepared statement.  "Historically, banning surcharging has been an important safeguard, and it remains illegal in ten states.  To the extent that retailers do assess checkout fees, we are pleased that the settlement includes important safeguards that will help to curb any abusive or excess checkout fees at the register."

The National Retail Federation was not quite as sanguine.

"The money is significant but money is only temporary - it's here today and spent tomorrow. What we need are changes in the rules that bring about transparency and competition that would be here for years to come," said NRF Mallory Duncan. "The test will be whether the injunctive relief is meaningful. Unless it is, the card market will stay broken and neither merchants nor their customers will achieve a long-term benefit. In that case, it would be a missed opportunity."

Convenience factor

Ironically, while the case has been working its way through the courts, debit cards have largely displaced credit cards for many smaller purchases and many retailers have taken advantage of new technology that makes it faster and easier to process payments.

Retailers also pay swipe fees for debit card transactions and there has been an entirely different -- thousand somewhat similar -- controversy swirling around those fees. 

It takes just a few minutes of hanging around a retail establishment to find that many consumers aren't sure whether the card they're using is a credit or a debit card, a situation that is not aided by the fact that many cards can be used as either.

In the end, consumers are not likely to put up with different prices based on how they choose to pay except in the rare instances when large purchases are being made with credit cards.  

A seven-year dispute between retailers and credit card issuers over "swipe fees" has been settled. It will cost Visa and MasterCard $6 billion -- and ...

Article Image

Consumer Credit Surges In May

Consumers tapped into credit in a big way during May, according to the latest report by the U.S. Federal Reserve. Credit use rose by $17.12 billion, the most in five months.

Is this good news or bad? Economists might say it is good since more consumer spending is always considered a tonic for a lagging economy. But if consumers tapped into credit just to pay their bills that month, that's not so good.

Consumer confidence?

An initial review of the data suggests the big increase in credit spending may have been a sign of growing consumer confidence. Revolving credit, a segment that includes credit cards, rose by $8.01 billion.

That increase in credit card use was the largest since November 2007, the month before the economy slipped into a recession. A year later, when the U.S. economy seized up in the credit crisis of 2008, credit began to dry up and consumers began paying down their credit card balances.

Gradually consumers have begun using their plastic again with credit card spending rising since mid 2011. May's surge in the use of plastic may indeed be a healthy sign if consumers used their cards for non-necessities like restaurant meals and vacations. If they used their cards more for groceries and gasoline, it might not be such a good sign.

While credit card usage scored a healthy gain, so did non-revolving credit, which includes things like car and education loans. That sector was up $9.1 billion.

Economists generally greeted the report with optimism, suggesting it is a sign that credit channels, which narrowed significantly after 2008, are widening once again. Though the data do not include mortgage debt, a few economists expressed the hope that general increases in credit flows would eventually make their way to the mortgage market, helping the housing market recover.

Consumers tapped into credit in a big way during May, according to the latest report by the U.S. Federal Reserve. Credit use rose by $17.12 billion, the mo...

Article Image

FTC Halts Deceptive Prepaid Calling Card Scheme Targeting Immigrants

The feds have shut down another scam targeting immigrants -- this one involving calling cards. 

The Federal Trade Commission has halted the deceptive advertising claims of a company that markets prepaid phone cards by allegedly misrepresenting the number of calling minutes its cards provide -- and failing to make adequate disclosure of additional fees. The company agreed to halt its misleading claims, pending a trial in which the agency will seek to halt the deceptive claims permanently and force the company to give up its ill-gotten gains. 

The case against DR Phone Communications is part of a continuing FTC effort to address deceptive advertising and marketing practices in the prepaid calling card industry, which sells billions of dollars worth of cards a year -- many of them to immigrants who depend on them to call friends and family in other countries. 

Asians targeted 

The FTC charged that the DR Phone scheme targeted immigrant communities. Using brand names such as "Beautiful Asia," "Vietnam Best," and "Pearls of Africa," the cards were sold in convenience stores, groceries and kiosks across the country and on DR Phone's Website. 

According to the FTC, marketing material -- typically point-of-sale posters -- displayed brightly colored text bubbles touting calling minutes to a particular destination with a card of specified amount -- for example, "Philippines 70 min-per $5." 

Large letters at the top of the posters claimed, "No Fees," "No Connection Fee," and "No Maintenance Fee." Small print at the bottom of the posters made vague reference to fees without adequately disclosing what those fees would be. 

One disclosure simply stated "International calls made to cellular phones and calls via toll free numbers are billed at higher rate." without adequately disclosing what those higher rates would be. 

FTC tests 

The FTC bought and tested 169 of the company's cards. The agency’s complaint alleged that 100 percent of the tested cards failed to deliver the number of minutes advertised. The worst performing card delivered less than one percent of the advertised minutes. On average, the 169 cards delivered only 40.42 percent of the advertised time. 

The FTC charged that the deceptive claims about the calling minutes and the failure to disclose adequately the additional fees and charges violate federal law. As part of an agreement between the defendants and the FTC, the court ordered a temporary halt to the illegal practices, pending trial. 

Defendants named in the FTC complaint are DR Phone Communications, also doing business as Drphonecom.com, and David Rosenthal.

The feds have shut down another scam targeting immigrants -- this one involving calling cards....

Article Image

Consumers Find New Causes Of Unauthorized Charges

Unauthorized charges often show up on consumers' credit card bills when they accept a free or trial offer. Now it appears that unauthorized charges from Experian can also result from a job search or for no reason at all.

Julie, of Louisville, KY, says she is a recent college graduate who started her job search last March using job sites like Careerbuilder and Monster.com.

“After a lot of hiring agencies contacting me, I got a few legit-looking emails, one of which asked me to fill out a free credit report, because the job required my dealing with money,” Julie wrote in a ConsumerAffairs post. “I naively did, making sure to not click on any button for 'memberships' or that involved any number higher than free. Found out today, though, that they'd been charging my debit card $19.95 for the past three months.”

Red flag

Julie had to enter her debit card information in order to receive the credit report, which should have been her first tip-off that she was being signed up for something that would eventually cost her money. In this case it was a credit monitoring service offered by Experian.

“I called my bank (Chase), and they said all they could do was block future charges from Experian and gave me a number to contact that company,” Julie wrote. “I did, and talked a very nice woman who said all she could do was cancel my membership and refund one month. I should be receiving a single amount of $19.95 in the next seven business days. Though my temper flared when she tried to coerce me into keeping the membership, she still maintained etiquette and even congratulated me on graduating. As nice as she was, I'm still out $40.”

Ashley, of Chico, CA, says she found three months worth of charges from Experian Credit Scores on her bank statement.

“I have never signed up for any credit report Website,” she wrote to ConsumerAffairs. “I called Experian, and the representative told me apparently a Natasha and an Amy were authorized to use my bank account to order credit score reports. I do not know anyone with those names, and even if I did, I would not be so stupid as to authorize anyone to use my bank card.”

Odd purchase

Ashley isn't the only consumer to have this experience. During June several consumers have reported that Experian credit reports were ordered, using their cards, by people they had never heard of.

Gayle, of Wayne, PA, disputed a $19.95 charge for an Experian credit service that Experian said had been placed by another person using Gayle's card.

“They then offered to reimburse me the money without my giving them the expiration date on my credit card or the code on the back of it,” Gayle wrote. “Why would they be so eager to reimburse me the money? It sounds so fishy. I have read that this has happened to other people and it follows the same pattern. They claim a second party uses your credit card to access a report. I don't believe that. I think if someone has your credit card number, they would go to Walmart and purchase stuff rather than a credit report. I suspect that Experian is the source of the fraud.”

Whatever the source of the rash of unauthorized charges, it underscores the need for consumers to carefully review bank statements and credit card bills each month.

Unauthorized charges often show up on consumers' credit card bills when they accept a free or trial offer. Now it appears that unauthorized charges from Ex...

Article Image

How To Choose The Right Prepaid Credit Card

For many consumers, prepaid credit cards are replacing bank accounts. Money can be direct deposited to these accounts and the cards used to make purchases or get cash from ATMs.

The problem with prepaid cards, however, is navigating the fees. Some cards have more and higher fees than others. Not all cards have the same capabilities. Choosing the right card can mean the difference between saving money and overspending.

Consumers are expected to load $82 billion into prepaid card accounts during 2012, according to the Mercator Advisory Group. That would be a 44 percent increase from last year.

If the group’s prediction that we load $117 billion during 2013 holds true, prepaid card deposits will have increased 200 percent in just three years.

Best and worst

Card Hub, a credit card information website, has analyzed the prepaid card offers and selected the best and worst in three different use categories:

Alternative Checking Account

Best Card: Green Dot Gold Prepaid Visa Card

Worst Card: Account Now Visa Classic

Children’s Allowance

Best Card: The Suze Orman Prepaid Card

Worst Card: NetSpend Prepaid MasterCard – Fee Advantage/ACE Elite Prepaid Visa - FeeAdvantage Plan

Alternative Check Cashing Tool

Best Card: Chase Liquid Card

Worst Card: Original RushCard – Monthly Plan

The study looked at 20 cards and found that seven of them were not suitable to serve as an alternative to a checking account because they lacked direct deposit or online bill paying capability. Only two of the cards were suitable as alternative check cashing tools, as the other 18 do not allow consumers to load checks directly onto their cards.

For example, Chase offers use of its bank branches and ATMs to Chase Liquid cardholders, but Capital One does not integrate its own prepaid card with the rest of its everyday banking services in the same manner.

While you may assume that ACE, the largest check cashing company in the US, would offer a prepaid card conducive to check cashing, neither of its cards are suitable to be an alternative check cashing tool, the study found.

Difficult decision

“The prepaid card market is difficult to navigate for two reasons: Most consumers are new to it and there are a multitude of different fees that prepaid card issuers have been known to charge," said Odysseas Papadimitriou, founder and CEO of Card Hub. "Unfamiliarity can lead consumers to simply apply for whichever card is offered by a company they’ve heard of, and the broad range of fees can make this a costly mistake."

In fact, choosing the wrong card for they way you need to use it can cost hundreds of dollars each year.

"The most important things to consider when evaluating a prepaid card are its fees and features, not branding or the name of its issuer," Papadimitriou said. "The first step in choosing the right card is realizing that not every card is suitable for every purpose, so you need to quickly rule out cards that prevent you from accomplishing certain tasks –paying billers that do not accept plastic, for example."

Once you have determined how you need to use the card, choose the one that will be least expensive in light of your intended usage.

"Ultimately, we better get used to this because prepaid cards are bound to have a prominent role in the personal finance landscape for years to come," Papadimitriou said.

For many consumers, prepaid credit cards are replacing bank accounts. Money can be direct deposited to these accounts and the cards used to make purchases...

Article Image

Consumer Group Urges Tighter Controls On Subprime Credit Cards

In comments filed with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) the National Consumer Law Center (NCLC) says the government watchdog should find a way to protect low-income consumers from “exorbitant, deceptive and abusive fees and other practices” of subprime credit card issuers.

The comments were issued in response to a CFPB proposal to withdraw a rule that requires pre-account opening fees to be included in the calculation of fees for purposes of the government's 25 percent cap. That rule, established under the CARD Act, requires that first year fees not be more than 25 percent of the card's credit limit.

First Premier Bank sued the CFPB last year to block the agency from considering its first year fees in that 25 percent calculation. For at least one of First Premier's cards, there are $130 in first year fees while the credit limit is sometimes as low as $300.

But in its suit, First Premier argued that its fee structure was “in accordance with law and regulations” and that the higher fees, which were not deducted from the customer's credit limit, were necessary to protect the bank against the risk of default.

Urged not to abandon the rule

“The CFPB should retain the current rule as issued by the Federal Reserve Board (FRB),” the group said in its comments. “In the alternative, the CFPB should re-issue the rule that includes pre-account opening fees in the 25 percent cap by using its expanded authority under the Truth In Lending Act or its authority under Dodd-Frank to prohibit unfair, deceptive or abusive practices.”

NCLC criticized First Premier Bank in particular, taking issue with its fees. Over the years, a number of consumers have been critical as well.

“Many years ago, I was desperate to rebuild my credit due to a divorce,” Gerald, of Brownstown, Mich., wrote in a ConsumerAffairs post. “I got my Premier credit card to start me back to a better rating. Working 12-hour days, I unfortunately didn't pay attention to fine print on the application. I believe the fees came to well over $200 just to have this 'wonderful' card with a $300 limit.”

Mike, of Flanders, N.J., says the cards are marketed to people with less than sterling credit, but that the fees just make their situations worse.

“The initial credit limit is so low and on top of what is a low initial limit, they charged me $130 in fees,” Mike wrote. “They charge you $4.50 to access your own account online, then to increase your credit after a few months of good payments, they charge you for increase as well.”

Different cards, different fees

First Premier Bank, like most banks that serve the subprime market, offers a number of different credit card products, each with different terms. The card with the highest fees currently assesses two fees of $75 and $55 to open an account. The $75 fee is an "annual fee" that drops to $45 after the first year.

“We also urge the CFPB, in conjunction with the Federal Reserve Board, to closely examine First Premier Bank and other issuers of cards targeted at consumers with poor credit records,and to bring any appropriate enforcement actions,” NCLC said in its comments. “In particular, the high default rates of the First Premier card, which is deliberately targeted at consumers with poor credit records, show that it is violating the ability to repay rule. A review of complaint reports posted online also indicates numerous other problems and high consumer dissatisfaction.”

The group said cards targeted at consumers with poor credit records that harm credit worthiness or do not live up to implications that they will improve credit should be considered unfair, deceptive and abusive.

In comments filed with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) the National Consumer Law Center (NCLC) says the government watchdog should find a w...

Article Image

Finding the Best Cash-Back Credit Card For You

There are an increasing number of credit cards that offer various amounts of cash back on your purchases. Selecting the best one might not be that easy, however, since cards offer bigger rewards for some purchases than others.

"We did an analysis of the typical U.S. consumer's spending habits and designed a calculator that will help them find the cash-back credit card that will be more most beneficial for them," Erik Larson, President of NextAdvisor, told ConsumerAffars. "Everyone's spending is different."

 And the cards are all different too. Some might pay you more for gasoline purchases. Others might pay the most on travel. If you travel a lot in your business, then it would serve you to have a rewards card that paid the most for travel charges rather than one that rewarded you for grocery purchases.

"We calculated the savings over two years instead of one because usually, in the first year, there will be some kind of bonus for opening the account," Larson said. "By including the second year we can provide a more realistic picture of the rewards."

First year bonus cash

Consumers rank Capital One

For example, the Capital One Cash Rewards card includes a $100 bonus when you spend $500 in the first 3 months. That means you will probably get more back in the first year than the second.

The Capital One Cash Rewards card, which ranks first in NextAdvisor rankings of cash-back cards, offers a straight one percent cash back on all purchases, but also includes a 50 percent annual cash back bonus. This bonus nets cardholders 50 percent of the cash back they earn each year.

NextAdisor's calculator ranks 12 different cards, most without an annual fee. While an annual fee will cut into a users net cash back rewards, Larson says it doesn't have to be a deal-breaker.

"For example, the Blue Cash Preferred card from American Express has an annual fee, but if you spend a lot each month in it's prime categories, it's worth it to pay the fee," Larson said. "On the other hand, if you don't spend a lot each month, selecting a card with an annual fee might not pay off."

For many credit card customers, the whole idea that more card issuers would be offering you cash instead of hitting you with fees is a refreshing change from just a few years ago. The CARD Act has been in force for two years now, and Larson says he thinks generally it has improved the credit card landscape for many consumers.

Using the NextAdvisor calculator, consumers are not only able to identify the cash-back card that is best for them but can go to the company's website where they can apply. But Larson says consumers should do their homework before applying.

"Look for a card with a program you can understand," he said.

There are an increasing number of credit cards that offer various amounts of cash back on your purchases. Selecting the best one might not be that easy, ho...

Article Image

Consumers Getting Fewer Credit Card Offers

Recent data shows that credit card debt is down. Maybe it's no coincidence that there are also fewer credit card offers clogging your mailbox.

The cool-off in credit card mail that began in the winter of 2011 looks set to continue, at least for now, according to Mintel Comperemedia.

For example, In April 260 million offers for new credit cards were received at US households, down 33 percent from the 390 million offers US households received during April of last year. This is the lowest estimated monthly mail volume tracked in the past 25 months, according to Mintel Comperemedia.

"April marks a new low for the credit card direct mail decline that began in December 2011," said Andrew Davidson, senior vice president at Mintel Comperemedia. "The last time volumes were lower was back in March 2010. At that time a come-back in direct mail was gathering steam following severe cut backs during the recession. That come-back turned into a two-year period of expansion that peaked in June 2011 when 497 million offers were received by US households."

Lenders more cautious

While there is no evidence to suggest that consumers have lost their appetite for credit, Davidson says it appears that lenders have become more cautious again. However, he says it might just reflect a cycle and not be part of a long-term trend.

Once the long term outlook for the economy gains more solid footing, he predicts confidence and direct mail volumes will return. When they do, Davidson predicts the offers will be more competitive, as companies look for ways to stand apart from their competitors.

"Credit card direct mail volume will be significantly lower in 2012 than 2011," Davidson said. "For credit card issuers this is a great time to be in the mail. The mailbox is less cluttered and it is easier to get consumers to notice your message."

Consumers, of course, should exercise discipline and discretion before applying for new credit cards. Routinely lenders use the offer of lower-interest balance transfers to gain new customers. Consumers should read the terms and conditions carefully.

Recent data shows that credit card debt is down. Maybe it's no coincidence that there are also fewer credit card offers clogging your mailbox.The cool-of...

Article Image

Before Getting Prepaid Debt Card, Check Out the Fees

There's no doubt that prepaid debit cards are growing in popularity among U.S. consumers, particularly those who don't have traditional bank accounts.

But these cards carry fees, and new research reveals that a startlingly high number of consumers aren't aware of them. According to a new survey from CouponCabin.com, nearly six-in-ten -- 58 percent -- U.S. adults said they are not aware of fees associated with prepaid debit card use.

In addition, 27 percent of U.S. adults agree they are more likely to use a prepaid debit card now than before the recession. This survey was conducted online within the United States by Harris Interactive.

Be aware

"More consumers are using prepaid debit cards these days, but like with any financial decision, users need to be aware of the pros and cons of using these cards," said Jackie Warrick, President and Chief Savings Officer at CouponCabin.com. "Even as new consumer protections are sought, users need to do their homework to ensure that prepaid debit cards are a good fit for their personal budget and lifestyle."

In May the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) announced it is previewing proposed rules to protect consumers in the prepaid card market. The agency is seeking input on how to ensure that consumers’ funds on prepaid cards are safe and that card terms and fees are transparent.

How prepaid cards are used

Forty-two percent of U.S. adult consumers say they have purchased or received a prepaid debit card for personal use. When asked how they have used their prepaid debit cards, they replied:

  • For everyday purchases – 69 percent
  • To make purchases online – 36 percent
  • To use instead of cash or credit when I travel – 19 percent
  • To take out money from an ATM – 10 percent
  • Other – 10 percent

When it comes to opinions on prepaid debit cards, consumers are evenly split. Forty-four percent have a negative opinion of the cards, while 43 percent view the cards positively. Of those who have a positive opinion, they report they like prepaid debit cards because it's safer than cash, helps them budget and they don't have to worry about overdraft fees or accumulating credit card debt.

There are some downsides to prepaid cards and those negatives also showed up in the survey. Twenty-five percent of respondents said the cards don't help build a credit score and 24 percent cited too many fees.

Obviously, a fair amount of research is required before selecting a prepaid card. Consumers should look into all the fees, deadlines, contracts and more before signing up. The fees and fee schedule can vary greatly from card to card, so make sure to pick one that best fits your lifestyle and budget.

Warrick also suggests keeping credit cards active, even if you aren't using them. Since prepaid cards don't affect your credit, having an open credit card account will be helpful.

More about credit and debit cards

There's no doubt that prepaid debit cards are growing in popularity among U.S. consumers, particularly those who don't have traditional bank accounts.But...

Article Image

40 percent of Americans Say They Know Little About Their Finances

It's no big secret that consumers love their credit cards. In fact, newly issued bank cards went up by nearly 37 percent in February 2012, according to Equifax.

Financial experts also say that 40 percent of Americans don't consider themselves to be financially literate, which can lead consumers to getting credit cards with poor rates, low credit scores, and a host of personal finance problems.

"Before the Credit CARD Act, 100 percent of the cards we looked at included practices regulators found to be harmful or unfair," said Nick Bourke, director of the Pew research group’s Safe Credit Cards Project. "The [credit] market really wasn't working. It was much more difficult for consumers to identify a good card from a bad one."

The report outlines that most credit card agreements aren't fully understood by the average American consumer, as statements are written at a 12th-grade reading level, and the average American's reading level stops at at ninth grade. This makes it difficult for many consumers to make the best choice in selecting a card, and makes it even harder to choose a card based on personal need.

According to the 2012 Consumer Financial Literacy Survey, 42 percent of Americans gave themselves a failing grade when asked to score themselves on how well they understood the area of finance. Additionally, the National Endowment for Financial Education asked teachers if they felt knowledgeable enough to teach personal finance to students, and add it to their curriculum. Nearly 20 percent sent they didn't.

So where can consumers go to learn about personal finance outside of a college classroom? Financial classes aren't something that's normally marketed to the consumer, and many times it's far easier to get a credit card than it is to receive a proper tutorial on them. Also, many credit card companies make great deals of money from the financially ignorant, so why bother to educate?

According to the three U.S. credit bureaus, 1 in 5 consumers have poor credit, and TransUnion says the average debt per cardholder came to $4,962 at the end of 2012's first quarter.

Financial experts also believe that an overload of financial information makes it extremely hard for the average American to make a balanced choice on a good credit card. Plus, being overwhelmed by constant offers from banks, retailers and telemarketers, could make the consumer quickly make the wrong card selection, just to remove that feeling of bombardment.

"Not everyone has the same needs so being able to compare features and benefits of multiple cards side by side can really help consumers find the cards that best suit their individual needs," said Stephanie Cobb, Business Developer for Credit Card Select. "Our Credit Card Comparison Tool allows consumers to add their favorite cards to a compare bin or shopping cart so they can easily come back to them later and compare their favorites side by side."

Credit Card Select went on to say that consumers should really understand the differences in each card and offer, and carefully choose a card that best suits their credit range, among other personal needs.

Consumers can better educate themselves by learning about credit laws, and by reading up on the Credit Card Act, that was passed by the United States Congress in 2009. The Credit Card Act has many provisions in place that deal with limiting how credit card companies can charge consumers.

It's no big secret that consumers love their credit cards. In fact, newly issued bank cards went up by nearly 37 percent in February 2012, according to Equ...

Article Image

Research: Abusive Credit Card Lenders Lose Money

Credit card lenders that use unfair or deceptive practices aren't just hurting consumers. They're also hurting themselves.

That's the underlying message of a recent report by the Center for Responsible Lending that finds onerous policies have unintended consequences. The study found that high-cost penalty fees and interest rates were not used to mitigate risk - as credit card issuers claimed - but instead were the risk that led to higher default rates.

Banks with more consumer-friendly policies in place had lower default rates. The researchers attribute that to the fact that customers aren't getting hit with as many expensive fees.

In fact, the study found that bad practices are a better predictor of consumer complaints and an issuer’s losses during a downturn than an institution’s type, size or location.

Safeguards

Consumer safeguards on credit cards enhance banks’ financial health, contrary to issuers’ past claim that safeguards undermine it, the research found. Credit card issuers with higher loss rates before the recession did not on average have a bigger jump in losses during the recession, indicating that having more high-risk customers did not predict which company’s problems would grow fastest.

New credit card rules have curbed or ended many of the unfair practices the study examined, such as doubling interest rates on existing balances for being a day late in making a payment. But some persist, and none of the new rules apply to business credit cards. The authors suggest regulators need to better police those areas.

“CRL thinks the report’s findings apply equally to high-cost fees and interest rates banks charge for overdraft and payday loans,” the consumer group said in its report. “These charges — like their predatory cousins in credit card lending — don’t reflect a borrower’s risk of default, but are the risk that too often pushes a customer into financial hardship or default.”

Credit card lenders that use unfair or deceptive practices aren't just hurting consumers. They're also hurting themselves.That's the underlying message o...

Article Image

Feds Propose Prepaid Card Rules

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) is previewing proposed rules to protect consumers in the fast-growing prepaid card market.  The agency is seeking input on how to ensure that consumers’ funds on prepaid cards are safe and that card terms and fees are transparent.

“The people who use prepaid cards are, in many instances, the most vulnerable among us,” said CFPB Director Richard Cordray. “All consumers need, and deserve, products which are safe and whose costs and risks are clear upfront.  Yet right now prepaid cards have far fewer regulatory protections than bank accounts or debit or credit cards.  That’s why we are launching a rulemaking to promote safety and transparency in this emerging market.”

The Bureau also launched Ask CFPB: Prepaid Cards – a searchable online tool with easy-to-understand answers to more than 80 questions about prepaid cards.   The questions cover a range of topics from a general overview of prepaid cards and their fees to how to obtain, reload, and use a prepaid card. 

The Bureau’s rulemaking will focus on “General Purpose Reloadable” prepaid cards which allow consumers to load the cards with money upfront and use them as if they were checking account debit cards.  According to a 2009 FDIC study, 9.7 percent of all households used these prepaid cards.  Mercator Advisory Group reports that the prepaid market totals $57 billion and is expected to grow at a rate of 42 percent per year from 2010-2014.  The two largest prepaid card program managers have reported a jump from 3.4 million active cards in 2009 to over 7 million this year.  It is projected that the total dollar amount loaded onto prepaid cards will hit $167 billion in 2014.

None too soon

CFPB's action comes none too soon, according to Consumers Union and other consumer advocates. An April Consumer Reports analysis of prepaid cards found that industry competition is beginning to help bring down fees, but fees aren't always disclosed up front and can still add up quickly. Moreover, prepaid cards offer weaker consumer protections than those provided by traditional debit cards.

"The prepaid card market has exploded in the U.S. but consumers still don't enjoy the protections they need to ensure they are getting a fair deal," said Michelle Jun, senior attorney for Consumers Union. "It's time for the CFPB to require clear disclosure of all fees in a simple format so consumers know the costs before they purchase a card. Prepaid cards should get the same strong protections as traditional debit cards so consumers have the peace of mind that their money is safe if their card is lost or stolen."

Many prepaid cards are now offering new features to enable consumers to establish credit files or help those with bad credit to rebuild their credit record. But Consumer Reports found that information from prepaid card transactions is not useful to help a consumer build a credit record. Consumers Union said that the CFPB or the Federal Trade Commission should monitor credit building claims made by prepaid card issuers to ensure consumers aren't being misled.

Much of the growth in the prepaid market is coming from consumers who are using the prepaid card as an alternative to a checking account. The largest prepaid card program manager in the United States reported that funds directly deposited onto its prepaid cards increased by nearly 70 percent from 2010 to 2011. And the second largest prepaid card program manager reported that 42 percent of their customers had direct deposit linked to their accounts at the end of 2011.   

Despite its growth, the prepaid market is still largely unregulated at the federal level. With today’s Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, the Bureau plans to evaluate several topics:

  • Fees and Terms Disclosure: The lack of an industry-wide standard on prepaid card fee disclosure may make it difficult for consumers to understand the cost of the product or compare fees.  Often, consumers do not know what protections or fees come along with their prepaid cards prior to purchase because such disclosures are contained inside the packaging.  Consumers need to be able to comparison shop in order to make well-informed decisions. The Bureau will evaluate the best way to balance the need for disclosure with the fact that many cards are purchased at retail locations and space for disclosures is limited. Consumers should also know whether or not their funds are protected by FDIC insurance.  The Bureau plans to evaluate how prepaid card issuers should disclose the insurance status of cardholders’ funds. 
  • Unauthorized Transactions: Federal regulations require that credit and debit card issuers limit consumers’ liability when their cards are used without their authorization. These regulations do not extend to prepaid cards.  Many prepaid card issuers voluntarily offer this protection, but it is not standard across the industry. The Bureau will evaluate the costs and benefits of card issuers providing limited liability protection from unauthorized transactions.
  • Product Features: Most prepaid cards do not offer any credit features.  In general, cardholders may not be able to withdraw or spend more than the funds loaded on their cards. However, some prepaid cards allow their cardholders to overdraw their accounts, and some offer small-dollar loans or a line of credit. Similarly, very few prepaid cards have a savings account.  Even though such savings accounts typically have high interest rates, consumers do not seem to take advantage of the opportunity to save. Another feature is that of credit repair, which claims to offer consumers the opportunity to improve or build credit. The Bureau is looking for public input on the costs, benefits, and consumer protection issues related to those product features.

The CFPB is holding a field hearing today in Durham, N.C. to hear from consumer experts, industry stakeholders, and the public about the Bureau’s prepaid card rulemaking. 

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) is previewing proposed rules to protect consumers in the fast-growing prepaid card market.  The agency...

Article Image

JPMorgan Chase Gambles and Loses $2 Billion

If you own a bank stock in your portfolio or retirement account, you're likely taking a beating in the stock market today. Bank stocks, led by JPMorgan Chase, are taking a dive after Chase disclosed a $2 billion loss in a credit swap bet.

As expected, the news has had a swift and visceral reaction in consumer -- and presumably investor -- perceptions. A ConsumerAffairs sentiment analysis of about 120,000 comments on Facebook, Twitter and other social media over the last year finds the bank's net sentiment taking a nose dive as news of the huge loss broke.

Chase took the position in the European credit market, essentially betting that the credit situation in Europe would worsen. At the time – the first quarter of this year – it looked like a safe bet.

But as any Vegas gambler will tell you, sometimes the odds fail you. In the case of Chase they did, as the credit outlook in Europe got better.

The immediate result was that Chase shares lost about eight percent of their value in early trading on Wall Street. Other bank shares tumbled in sympathy, as Chase was viewed as one of the strongest U.S. bank stocks.

The larger question, of course, is what this will mean for bank regulations. Chase CEO Jamie Dimon has led public efforts to push back against regulations, saying they are too costly and that the industry doesn't need them. In Washington, plenty of lawmakers beg to differ.

'Risky bets'

Consumers rate their Chase experience

“The enormous loss JPMorgan announced is just the latest evidence that what banks call ‘hedges’ are often risky bets that so-called ‘too big to fail’ banks have no business making,” said Sen. Carl Levin (D-MI).

Rep. Barney Frank (D-MA), ranking Democrat on the House Financial Services Committee, delivered a particularly blistering reaction.

“This regrettable news from JPMorgan Chase obviously goes counter to the bank’s narrative blaming excessive regulation for the woes of financial institutions,” Frank said in a statement. “Interestingly, in the Economist’s long attack on the financial reform bill, one of their leading examples of the harm the bill is doing was JPMorgan Chase’s assertion that complying with the new rules will cost $400 to $600 million at the outset. In other words, JP Morgan Chase, entirely without any help from the government, has lost in this one set of transactions, five times the amount they claim financial regulation is costing them.”

Federal financial regulators are currently drafting measures that would place limits on bank's “proprietary trading,” the type of which just resulted in the stunning Chase loss. Levin, who co-authored the so-called “Volcker Rule,” which called for these limits under the 2010 Dodd-Frank Financial Reform Act, believes the Chase debacle just underscores the need for the reform.

The Volcker rule is designed to limit banks' ability to make risky hedge bets using the money of depositors, which is insured by FDIC.

If you own a bank stock in your portfolio or retirement account, you're likely taking a beating in the stock market today. Bank stocks, led by JPMorgan Cha...

Article Image

Chase Rolls Out Prepaid Bank Card

More banks are getting into the prepaid bankcard business. Why? Because there can be lots of fees associated with that product, just what banks think they need to remain profitable.

They also are not covered by new banking regulations in the Durbin Amendment that have limited or taken away some fees altogether.

JPMorgan Chase is the latest big bank to roll out a prepaid card. Its card is called Chase Liquid. It's now being offered at about 200 branches but should be available throughout the U.S. in the next few months.

With a prepaid card, a consumer loads a set amount of money on the card. It can then be used like a debit card, with the money removed from the card with each transaction.

And with each transaction, there is a fee. A fee to make a point of purchase transaction, a fee to make an ATM withdrawal, a monthly service fee, a fee to add money to the card, and so on.

Consumers with fewer options

Consumers rate Chase credit cards

Prepaid cards are normally used by consumers who have fewer banking options because of poor or no credit.

The Chase Liquid card will carry a monthly service fee of $4.95, which is below some of the other competing cards. For example, the NetSpend prepaid Visa card charges a monthly fee of $9.95 and the Green Dot prepaid card charges $5.95.

The PayPal prepaid card charges an identical $4.95 while the Walmart prepaid card carries a lower $3 monthly fee.

Another advantage of the Chase card is there is no fee for reloading money on the card if you do it at a Chase branch or ATM. Also, there is no ATM fee if you use it at a machine within the Chase network.

While many consumers might find the banks' new prepaid cards a good deal, retailers might not. Because they aren't subject to the Durbin Amendment, banks aren't limited in the “swipe” fees they can charge merchants.  

More banks are getting into the prepaid bankcard business. Why? Because there can be lots of fees associated with that product, just what banks think they...

Article Image

MasterCard Plans PayPass Wallet For Easier Shopping

In the latest attempt to create a cross-platform, one-click shopping service, MasterCard says it will release a digital wallet called PayPass Wallet Services that can be used for purchases, whether in-store, online, or on mobile phones.

MasterCard's new venture will be part of its PayPass point-of-sale-system, which includes almost 500,000 stores and brands around the globe, where customers can make purchases by easily tapping a card or phone with NFC (near-field communications). However, the difference with PayPass Wallet Services is that associated businesses will be able to create payment systems under their own brands.

Among the first merchants to join the PayPass system are Barnes & Noble and American Airlines. Customers will be able to click a purchase button on each of the company's websites after first providing the needed personal  information.

Convenience, flexibility

"Consumers are looking to pay for goods when, how and where they choose. Merchants want flexibility to easily accept digital payment so they can convert more browsers to buyers both online and in store," said Ed McLaughlin, chief merging payments officer for MasterCard. "We realize that when it comes to payments, no single wallet will rule them all. PayPass Wallet Services simplifies the shopping experience while providing flexibility and choice to merchants, brands and consumers."

Here's what PayPass Wallet Services comes with:

  • Acceptance Network (PayPass Online and PayPass Contactless) - Provides a globally consistent way to help merchants accept electronic payments across multiple channels whether the purchase is made in a store at the point of sale with Near Field Communication (NFC) technology or online using a computer, tablet or smartphone. PayPass Online also provides consumers with a simple check-out process by eliminating the need to enter detailed shipping and card information with every purchase.
  • Wallet - A full suite of digital wallet solutions enabling banks, merchants and partners to white label their own wallets. It makes online shopping safe and easy by allowing consumers to store payment and shipping information in one, convenient and secure place. The wallet is open, which means that consumers can use American Express, Discover, Visa and other branded credit, debit and prepaid cards.
  • API - Allows partners to connect their own digital wallets into the PayPass Acceptance Network, leveraging MasterCard's check-out, fraud detection and authentication services and enabling their customers to make purchases wherever PayPass is accepted - online and in store.

In the third quarter of 2012, MasterCard will make PayPass Wallet Services accessible to U.S., U.K., Canada, and Australia. Other countries will be included in the near future.

"MasterCard Canada led the adoption of innovative technologies in the payments space with the introduction of PayPass in 2005," stated President of MasterCard Canada, Betty K. DeVita. "With millions of Canadians now tapping with PayPass millions of times a month, we are ready to once again lead the market with innovations in mobile and eCommerce."

In continued attempts by companies to better appeal to today's tech-conscious consumer, MasterCard WorldWide has said it will release a digital wallet...

Article Image

Visa Increases its 'No Signature Limit' from $25 to $50

In an effort to increase transaction speed at the point of sales, Visa said that it plans to raise its Easy Payment service "no signature required" limit to $50 from its old amount of $25. The new limit will mainly be used in grocery and discount stores in the U.S.

Starting in October 2012, Visa Inc. says the higher transaction limit will also increase operational efficiencies and cardholder convenience. Visa will take a close look at feedback from merchants, card issuers and card holders in addition to the $50 limit change.

"Visa is committed to delivering solutions to help our merchant and financial institution partners better serve their customers, reduce costs and grow their businesses," said William M. Sheedy, Group President for Visa Inc. "Visa Easy Payment Service has been extremely popular with merchants and cardholders in busy retail environments. As a result, merchants have asked to expand the program to purchases up to $50, so they can more efficiently support consumers' growing preference to use cards instead of cash or checks for everyday purchases."

Disputes

Visa also plans to review its dispute resolution process to eliminate wrongful chargebacks, while also looking to change its required merchant documentation. This is all to improve its customer complaint division, and create a faster and better ran payment system.

In other good news for merchants, they will also be protected against fraud chargebacks, which could potentially reduce merchant fraud expenditures. 

Visa sys all of these changes to Visa's Easy Payment Service and dispute resolution process will assist merchants to better serve their customers by streamlining the entire credit card process upon the customer's electronic swipe. In theory, this means faster and more convienant service for the consumer when choosing to shop with their Visa card.

In an effort to increase transaction speed at the point of sales, Visa said that they plan to raise its Easy Payment service "no signature required" limit...

Article Image

Feds Seize 36 Websites Involved in Selling Stolen Credit Card Numbers

Seizure orders have been executed against 36 domain names of websites engaged in the illegal sale and distribution of stolen credit card numbers, Assistant Attorney General Lanny A. Breuer of the Justice Department’s Criminal Division, U.S. Attorney Neil H. MacBride of the Eastern District of Virginia, and Acting Executive Assistant Director Kevin Perkins of the FBI’s Criminal, Cyber, Response, and Services Branch, announced.

The seizures are the result of Operation Wreaking hAVoC, an FBI and Justice Department operation targeting the sale of stolen credit card numbers via the Internet. The operation was coordinated with international law enforcement, including the United Kingdom’s Serious Organised Crime Agency (SOCA).

The 36 seized domains are in the custody of the federal government. Visitors to the sites will now find a seizure banner that notifies them that the domain name has been seized by federal authorities.

“The websites we are targeting today were commercial outlets for stolen credit card information,” said Assistant Attorney General Breuer. “By making this information available on the Internet, these websites facilitated fraud on credit card holders around the world. The actions announced today are the result of extraordinary coordination with our international law enforcement partners and reflect our commitment to use every tool at our disposal to shut down fraudulent, criminal enterprises.”

“Countless lives are thrown into financial turmoil because of these websites,” said U.S. Attorney MacBride. “With a few simple clicks, thousands of stolen credit card numbers can be bought or sold to fraudsters anywhere in the world. Today’s seizures are part of an ongoing campaign to disrupt this online market regardless of where it operates.”

“By seizing the websites the criminal underground uses to blatantly sell stolen personal information, Operation Wreaking hAVoC shows that we are committed to protecting individuals online and preventing criminals from using the Internet to line their pockets,” said FBI Acting Executive Assistant Director Perkins. “The FBI and our partners around the world are committed to disabling these criminal networks. No single law enforcement agency can fight cyber crime on its own, and the FBI is proud to be a part of such an outstanding effort by all of the participating agencies.”

Automated Vending Carts

The websites of the seized domain names are commonly referred to as Automated Vending Carts (AVCs). An AVC is a website that functions as an open-ended invitation to any visitor to purchase stolen credit card numbers. AVCs allow a user to buy stolen credit card data over the Internet, even using an online shopping cart, just like a traditional online retailer. Some AVC sites allow a buyer to select which type of credit card number to purchase, the account’s country of origin, and, in some cases, the state in which the account holder lives. AVCs allow sellers to traffic stolen credit card data without communicating directly with buyers.

During this operation, law enforcement officials made undercover purchases of credit card numbers, including credit card numbers issued by Bank of America, SunTrust, and Capital One. The banks confirmed that the sites were not authorized to sell the credit card numbers. Seizure orders were obtained from a federal magistrate judge in the Eastern District of Virginia.

This U.S. operation was led by FBI’s Washington Field Office; the Computer Crime and Intellectual Property and Asset Forfeiture and Money Laundering Sections of the Justice Department’s Criminal Division; and the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of Virginia. The FBI’s Pittsburgh Field Office and the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Western District of Pennsylvania also assisted in the investigation.

The international operation was led by the United Kingdom’s SOCA. The Australian Federal Police (AFP); German Bundeskriminalamt (BKA); United Kingdom’s Dedicated Cheque and Plastic Crime Unit (DCPCU); Macedonian Ministry of Interior Cyber Crime Unit (MOI); Ukraine Ministry of Internal Affairs; Romanian Ministry of Interior; and the Dutch High-Tech Crimes Unit (KLPD) provided assistance. Activities conducted by these international law enforcement agencies included arrests of AVC operators and purchasers, additional domain seizures, and data seizures.

Seizure orders have been executed against 36 domain names of websites engaged in the illegal sale and distribution of stolen credit card numbers, Assistant...

Article Image

Credit Card Companies Still Heavily Target Young Consumers

The Credit Card Accountability, Responsibility, and Disclosure (CARD) Act of 2009 was designed to end a number of credit card industry abuses, among them the heavy marketing of credit cards to college students.

While some of the reforms in the law may have been effective, a study by University of Houston Law Center Professor Jim Hawkins finds college students still are getting nearly the same number of credit offers, despite their inability to repay.

An expert in consumer credit, Hawkins said he surveyed more than 500 students and examined 300 agreements between issuers and colleges and alumni associations over the past two years.

Little effect

"Based on this survey and study, I found that many of the CARD Act's student and young consumer provisions have not affected credit markets in the ways the Act's proponents had hoped," Hawkins said.

The CARD Act took effect in February 2010 and was designed to prevent student over-indebtedness, to end aggressive marketing to college students, and to reveal and change agreements between credit card issuers and colleges.

According to the study, 68 percent of students under 21 reported receiving credit card offers in the mail during the preceding year, a practice the Act's sponsors hoped to curtail. Also, 40 percent of students reported seeing credit card companies giving gifts to students while the Act was in effect.

Under the Act, banks and card issuers were also banned from offering credit cards to anyone under the age of 21, unless they have a qualified co-signer or proof of sufficient income to repay the debt. Hawkins says he found little evidence of that change.

Troubling

"Most troubling, students are still qualifying for credit cards without demonstrating an ability to repay the debt," Hawkins said. "My study found that 27 percent of students under 21 who were applying by themselves for credit cards listed loans as part of their income to qualify for the card."

Hawkins also said he found that the requirement that credit card companies disclose previously secret agreements between issuers and colleges has caused virtually no change in the number of these agreements or their terms. Approximately 64 percent of the 300 agreements studied remained exactly the same in 2010 as they were in 2009.

"Some agreements were terminated, but almost all of them appear to have been terminated in the ordinary course of business," Hawkins said. "In only two cases in all of the 300 agreements that I reviewed did I observe any mention of regulation as influencing the decision to end the arrangement."

Loopholes

Part of the problem, says Hawkins, may lie in loopholes in the law. The Act does not explicitly ban sending people under 21 credit card offers in the mail; it just makes it more difficult to get their addresses. The Act also does not ban credit card marketing on colleges; it just prevents one narrow type of advertising, Hawkins notes.

"If Congress was concerned about people under 21 receiving credit card offers in the mail, it could directly prevent that conduct by making it illegal to mail anyone under 21 a credit card offer," Hawkins said. "Similarly, if Congress was concerned about abusive terms in the agreements between credit card companies and colleges, it could directly forbid those abusive terms instead of just requiring companies disclose the agreements."

The Credit Card Accountability, Responsibility, and Disclosure (CARD) Act of 2009 was designed to end a number of credit card industry abuses, among them t...

Article Image

Selecting a Prepaid Debit Card

As banks levy more fees on their customers, prepaid debit cards are beginning to look like a more viable alternative.

Prepaid cards are reloadable cards that can be used to make payments similar to debit cards and are becoming the foundation of a second-tier banking system.  Prepaid cards look like other plastic payment cards and bear the network logos of Visa, MasterCard or Discover along with the word "debit" on the front of the card.

The problem, of course, is that these cards carry a lot of fees of their own, which is what has made them less desirable in the past. But increasingly, competition within the industry has led to cards with fewer, and lower fees. The problem for consumers is to be able to more easily spot the cards that are most consumer-friendly.

Relying more on prepaid cards

"Now that so many households are relying on prepaid cards to manage their finances, it's time for the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) to take action to protect consumers," said Michelle Jun, senior attorney for Consumers Union, the policy and advocacy arm of Consumer Reports. "We need new rules that require fees to be disclosed in a simple format so consumers know the costs before they purchase a card.

"Prepaid cards should get the same strong protections as debit cards so consumers have the peace of mind that their money is safe if their card is lost or stolen," Jun said.

Consumers can typically only find information about a few of the fees charged by card issuers before they purchase a card at a store. While some prepaid card issuers are providing direct links to fee schedules on their web sites, others make finding this information more difficult.

While most cards charge a fee to activate an account, that's not the fee consumers should worry about, since it's a on-time charge. Instead, focus on the monthly fee and the transaction fees. Some monthly fees are as low as $3, making them competitive with most bank accounts.

Fees quickly add up

But what will it cost you to use the card? This is where fees can quickly add up. Selecting "credit" instead of "debit" when making a purchase will often result in no fee. When you need cash, select "debit" and get cash back. The debit fee will, in most cases, be lower than the fee for using an ATM.

The Federal Reserve has found that prepaid cards are the fastest growing non-cash method of payment.  That growth is expected to continue as the prepaid card industry works to attract the business of the estimated 60 million adults with limited or no access to bank accounts.

Selecting a Prepaid Debit Card...

Article Image

Student Says Unauthorized Charges Prevalent On Campus

Bridget, of Champaign, Ill., is a student at the University of Illinois. It sounds like she and others are getting an education in unauthorized credit card charges.

“There is an unauthorized $19.95 charge from Experian on my credit card,” Bridget wrote in a post on ConsumerAffairs.” I have not checked my credit score (ever) nor have I signed up for anything from this company.”

Bridget says she knows of other students who have had the same experience, and most recently she said, faculty and staff at the university have voiced the same complaint.

“Perhaps there was a glitch in a store on campus and our information was compromised,” Bridget wrote. “I am not sure who or how they got my information but this is an unauthorized charge that my credit card company is dealing with as we speak. This company should be looked at and investigated carefully by consumers before signing up for any of its services!”

It happens a lot

Bridget is not alone. Many of the complaints ConsumerAffairs receives about Experian have to do with unauthorized charges. And the complaints come from everywhere.

“They took money in the amount of $39.90 without my permission,” Diana, of Brawley, Calif., wrote in a recent post. “I don't remember giving my account number to them. Can they hack into my computer and do this?”

They didn't hack into Diana's computer – or anyone else's – because they didn't have to. Some companies maintain third party marketing relationships with other companies. When a consumer makes a credit card purchase with one company, without their knowledge that company shares their credit card information with another company, who then offers to sell the same consumer a recurring service.

Beware the negative option

But in many cases, the offer is written is such small print, and contains a “negative option” clause – such as “unless you tell us not to, we're enrolling you in this membership program and charging your credit card $39.95 a month – the computer doesn't notice it and, therefore, is surprised and angry when the charge shows up on their credit card.

Experian owns FreeCreditReport.com which offers free and low cost services, in exchange for enrolling in a “trial” of their credit monitoring service. It sounds like that could be the source of the widespread unauthorized charges on campus.

Diana said she is contesting the charges though her credit card company and that is the correct course of action. Arguing with the company that placed the charge on your account is usually unproductive. Credit card companies, on the other hand, argue with them every day, and have a lot more leverage that an individual consumer.

To avoid these traps, always decline “free” or “trial” offers. They always end up costing money. And if you want a free copy of your credit report, go to the government-maintained site www.annualcreditreport.com. It really is free.  

Bridget, of Champaign, Ill., is a student at the University of Illinois. It sounds like she and others are getting an education in unauthorized credit card...

Article Image

Can A Credit Card Help You Save Money On Gas?

Prices at the pump have surged in the last month amid predictions they will go even higher as summer approaches. Is there anything consumers can do to make a fill-up less painful?

Maybe. Using the right credit card, it turns out, can have gasoline-related advantages.

Card Hub, a company that analyzes credit card offers, reports there are two types of credit cards that offer gas rewards: gas station-affiliated credit cards and generic gas credit cards. Which type consumers get depends on their geographic location and spending habits.

Card Hub analyzed 1,000 cards listed the cards it says provide the best deals for motorists. The top three among generic gas credit cards are:

  • Pentagon Federal Credit Union Platinum Cash Rewards Credit Card – This is one of the Pentagon Federal Credit Union credit cards that offers 5% cash back on gas purchases at any station (as long as they’re paid at the pump) in addition to 1% cash back on all other purchases. While these cards do not have initial bonuses or annual fees, they do require PenFed membership, which will cost you $15.
  • Blue Cash Everyday from American Express – Provides 2% cash back at gas stations and department stores, 3% at supermarkets, and 1% on everything else. It has no annual fee and gives you a $100 bonus for spending $1,000 in the first three months.
  • TrueEarnings Card from Costco and American Express – Gives you 3% cash back on all gas purchases up to $3,000 (1% thereafter), 2% at restaurants, 2% on travel, and 1% on everything else. This card does not have an initial bonus, and Costco members do not have to pay an annual fee.

Of the three, Card Hub CEO Odysseas Papadimitriou says the Pentagon Federal Credit Card stands out.

 “It’s phenomenal that Pentagon Federal Credit Union is offering 5% cash back on gas, regardless of what station you buy it at," Papadimitriou said. "Rewards earning rates that high are typically only seen on station-affiliated cards."

Among station-affiliated cards, here are Card Hub's top three:

  • BP Credit Card – Offers rebates of 10% for BP gas, 4% for travel and dining, and 2% for everything else for the first 60 days after account enrollment.  Thereafter, consumers will get rebates of 5% for BP gas, 2% for travel and dining, and 1% for everything else. This card does not have an annual fee or an initial bonus.
  • Marathon Credit Card – Offers a 25-cent rebate (~6.9%) for each gallon of Marathon gas purchased during months a cardholder charges at least $1,000 on this card, $0.15/gal. (~4.2%) for spending $500 and $999.99, and $0.05 (~1.4%) for spending less than $500. This card does not have an annual fee or an initial bonus.
  • ExxonMobil MasterCard – Provides a 15-cent rebate (~4.2%) for each gallon of ExxonMobil gas as well as up to 2% rebates on all other purchases up to $10,000 in annual spending and 1% thereafter.  This card neither has an annual fee nor an initial bonus.

While station-affiliated gas credit cards could offer the most lucrative rewards, they certainly aren’t for everyone, given that users can only save on gas purchased at affiliated stations. Consumers should only open one if they’re already brand-loyal in their gas consumption or could easily become brand loyal without changing their habits significantly.  

How the right credit card can save money on gasoline...

Article Image

Watch Out For These Two Credit Card Fees

Credit card companies increasingly make their money on various fees, in addition to the interest rates they charge on balances. While new regulations have made some fees less onerous for consumers, there are others that can sock unsuspecting customers.

Card Hub, a company that analyzes the credit card industry, says it has completed an evaluation of over 1,000 credit card offers and focused on two fees in particular that it says should be “alarming” to consumers. The fees are assessed by the same credit card issuer, First Premier Bank.

The first is a 25 percent fee on credit limit increases. First Premier charges customers who ask for and receive a credit line increase a fee equal to 25 percent of the amount by which their credit limit rose.

$50 for a $200 increase

For example, a customer receiving a $200 credit limit increase will get charged a $50 fee. This fee, of course, is on top of any annual fee the customer pays. The fine print dictates that this fee will not be refunded unless the customer notifies the bank that they do not wish to keep the higher limit within 30 days of the date of the periodic statement on which it appears.

The second fee amounts to $170 in first-year fees for a $300 credit limit. The main card displayed on the company's website charges $170 in first-year fees, which is equivalent to 56.6 percent of its credit line. The recently passed CARD Act limits first year fees to 25 percent of the card's initial credit line. Card Hub points out that, with just an extra $30, a consumer could instead use that $170 fee to put $200 in cash toward a secured card's security deposit, which is completely refundable.

Complaints

Consumers have often complained about First Premiers fees and policies.

“First we had to pay over $130 to get the card and activate it in hopes to help our credit,” Lindsey, of Aurora, Colo., told ConsumerAffairs.com. “Then we found out we have to pay to access the account online, make a payment, and you can never talk to a live representative. The fees and rates are astronomical and for what? There is no benefit to owning this card.”

Lindsey said she would like to close the account once she finishes, but worries there will be a fee for that too.

Card Hub CEO Odysseas Papadimitriou notes First Premier successfully went to court to expect a portion of its initial fees from CARD Act limits. He says it's in the industry's best, long-term interests to try and help consumers.

“I think it’s time for credit card companies to really get on board with working together with regulators to do what’s right for their customers and the economy,” Papadimitriou said.

Credit card companies increasingly make their money on various fees, in addition to the interest rates they charge on balances. While new regulations have...

Article Image

Prepaid Debit Cards Getting Wider Use

There seems to be a sudden proliferation of prepaid debit cards, so marketers have enlisted celebrity endorsements to set their cards apart.

You may have seen ads for cards offered by Russell Simmons, the Kardashian sisters and Lil Wayne. But the latest celebrity-endorsed card bears the name of Suze Orman, known for her books and TV programs about personal finance.

So, is her card any better than the other fee-laden prepaid cards? Cardhub.com recent conducted an evaluation. They compared it to the Green Dot and American Express prepaid cards, which an earlier analysis had identified as the best replacements for a checking account and for its financial literacy tools.

Low basic fee structure

“Orman’s Approved Card has a pretty low basic fee structure as long as you regularly deposit money onto the card and use one of the over 35,000 ATMs AllPoint has nationwide," said Card Hub founder and CEO Odysseas Papadimitriou, a former Capital One executive. "However, there’s a fee floor, so to speak, which means this card will always cost you something.”

The Green Dot Prepaid Card is free to use as a replacement checking account, whereas the Approved Card will cost $3.25 per month.

The Green Dot Card costs $5.95/mo. for the financial literacy tool, the Amex Prepaid Card costs $6.66/mo., and the Approved Card costs $3.25/mo., making it currently the best option for teaching young people how to manage their money.

Bad for Suze?

Whether Suze Orman's card is good for consumers may be open to debate but, so far, what appears pretty certain is that the card isn't doing much for Suze Orman's reputation among consumers.

An analysis of about 31,000 consumer comments, admittedly just a handful, on Facebook, Twitter and other social media finds that she was enjoying a positive net sentiment rating as high as 80% until December, when the card was announced and her rating fell to near-zero territory.

There's not much doubt about what caused the steep plunge in net sentiment. Nearly all of the "dislikes" named by consumers had to do with the prepaid card.

Identity theft protection

The Orman Card provides a service through TrustedID that monitors your personal information and alerts you about any suspicious activity. This is undoubtedly beneficial for consumers, Card Hub says.

“Consumers often worry about identity theft, and the TrustedID service not only helps safeguard one’s money, but it also offers some peace of mind," Papadimitriou said. "The Emergency Fund feature also makes budgeting a little easier and overspending a bit more difficult – good things when you consider the rate at which people are adding new credit card debt these days.”

What should be clear to consumers using any prepaid card is that there are always fees involved for using your own money. It's just a matter of how many fees and how high they are.

Alternatives to the alternative

Consumers considering a prepaid card as an alternative to a big bank checking account might first check into what's available from a small, community bank or credit union. Small community banks, which sometimes have a few branches in urban and suburban areas, usually charge fewer fees and some even still provide free checking.

"Virtual" banks, like PerkStreet, provide more services than a simple prepaid card. PerkStreet offers a free checking account, online bill-paying and other services normally associated with brick-and-mortar banks.

Credit unions are membership organizations and are non-profit in nature. While they have to earn enough to pay operating costs, they don't have to show a profit and therefore, they tend to have fewer and lower fees.

---

Sentiment analysis powered by NetBase

A comparison on pre-paid debit cards...

Article Image

Consumer Offers Advice For Dealing With Unauthorized Charges

A number of consumers have recently complained about finding charges on their credit card bills for the MBNA Credit Protection Plan. Many, like Cyane, of San Francisco, Calif., have said they have no recollection of signing up for the service.

"I saw that a credit protection charge of around $58 - $65 had been applied to my bills," Cayne. "I don't remember seeing the charge so I called and asked for confirmation that I had ordered this service. The woman said I'd ordered it by phone. I asked for a record of the phone call, she said it was probably erased by now. I said I wanted to file a complaint. She said if I dropped the investigation, she'd credit my account two months. If I continued, with scant hope of winning my case, I would not be reimbursed. I just took the reimbursement for two months and am out $600, plus any interest I paid on that money."

Another reader, Steve of Ohio, was in the same situation but took another course.

"The same as other people who have complained, I had about $150 in charges accumulated over the past year," Steve told ConsumerAffairs.com. I finally noticed and contacted them.

Steve said he asked for the entire $150 back, saying he never signed up for the service. He says the customer service rep insisted that he had told a telemarketer he wanted the service. Steve says he stuck to his guns, demanding that MBNA Credit Protection provide a "proof of purchase."

"I was transferred to a supervisor who offered me a $30 credit to let it go," he said.

Holding out

Steve said he refused the offer and despite his repeated contacts didn't hear anything. He next filed a fraud report through his credit card company and not long afterward was reimbursed. The lesson for others in his situation?

"Stick to your word and demand proof, and they will either have to prove that you are wrong or else give you your money back," Steve said.

MBNA Credit Protection is a service that provides credit monitoring, as well as covering credit card payments in the event of certain adverse circumstances, such as loss of income. It's usually marketed in conjunction with another financial product or service.

Remember that the Federal Trade Commission requires that all such "negative option" sales clearly "clear and conspicuous" notice to the consumer that a sale is taking place. If you are unaware that you've bought something, chances are it doesn't meet that standard.

Consumers recently complained about finding charges on their credit card bills for MBNA Credit Protection Plan. Many said they have no recollection of sign...

Article Image

What If the Bank Paid You To Have an Account?

This is the time of year when most Americans are feeling pretty pinched.  Oh sure, everyone's jolly, merry and bright but they're also keeping a wary eye on the checking account and credit card balance.

It may create a little joy around your tree if you take a look at PerkStreet, which actually does what many banks and credit unions claim -- pays you to bank there, assuming you follow the rules.

How is that possible?  Well, this is a "bank" with no branches and just a single product -- a checking account that includes a debit card that pays you a rebate, or "perk," ranging from 1% to 5% of the purchases you make with the card.

Although hardly a household word, PerkStreet is generating a fair amount of buzz.  We analyzed more than 7,000 comments on Facebook, Twitter and other blogs and social media and found PerkStreet perking along with a net sentiment in the 90% neighborhood towards year's end, which is about as good as it gets.

PerkStreet is the brainchild of founder and CEO Dan O'Malley, a former Capital One executive.  As O'Malley tells it, it was while he was working on  Capital One's cash-back credit card business that it occurred to him that the rewards were really an incentive to run up a big credit card balance.

"I realized the product I was selling was designed to get people into debt," O'Malley said.  "A majority of families are not going to be able to pay off their credit card debts.  I found it distasteful."

O'Malley

O'Malley vowed to set up a reward program using debit cards, something that would reward consumers who spent only as much money as they had in their account.

The result is PerkStreet Financial, launched during 2009 in the midst of the worst financial crisis in nearly a century.  But O'Malley says the company has shown steady growth and, though it is not widely known, has more customers than 65 percent of the banks and credit unions in the country.

How it works

Basically, PerkStreet provides a free checking account and a debit card  that pays a 2% cash rebate if you have a balance of $5,000 on the day you make a purchase with the card.  Less than $5,000 and the card pays 1%.

From time to time, selected merchants offer daily deals that pay rebates of up to 5%.  

The 5% rebates are part of O'Malley's drive to build customer engagement and to give a "high five" to consumers for being frugal and making the decision to spend within their means.

It's no longer unusual for banks to not have branches and most consumers probably know someone who already uses a virtual bank.  There are various ways to make deposits, including direct payroll deposits, the mail and a forthcoming iPhone application that will let consumers scan the checks they want to deposit.  To get cash, customers use affiliated ATMs.

What is unusual is a debit card that pays rewards.  How does PerkStreet do it?  O'Malley attributes it to the money he saves by not having branches.

"We've stripped the costs out of the system.  If you take the amount the banking industry spends on branches and divide by the number of households in the country, it comes out to $800 per household per year," O'Malley claims.  

"It's a waste of everyone's money.  It's almost unethical to keep building these branches when they're not doing anything," he told ConsumerAffairs.com recently.

How well does it work?

We don't want to be unduly enthusiastic, not yet anyway, but unlike most banks, PerkStreet is not an object of widespread ridicule and hatred on the Web.  We found few derogatory comments, and our sentiment analysis found most consumers quite content.

Putting our money where our mouth is, we went to the PerkStreet site and signed up for an account.  It was a lot simpler than going to a branch bank -- something we had done twice in two days to try (unsuccessfully) to straighten out problems with our online Wells-Fargo account -- and took less than five minutes.

We simply typed in the account and routing numbers of our current account and authorized PerkStreet to take out $100 to get the new account up and running.  It's too soon to say how well it works but you can be sure we'll put it through its paces the next few weeks.

If you decide to try it, be sure to read the FAQs and take note of the various charges that can apply if you overdraw the account, let it sit idle or ask for special services.  Otherwise, it looks like it might be a good way to get the new year off on the right foot.

---

Sentiment analysis powered by NetBase

This is the time of year when most Americans are feeling pretty pinched.  Oh sure, everyone's jolly, merry and bright but they're also keeping a wary ...

Article Image

How To Improve Your Credit Score

A common concern among people writing to ConsumerAffairs.com is their credit score. They often worry how some action will affect their credit.

"We were in financial hardship and were needing to short sell our condo," Nicolette, of Saratoga Springs, Utah, told ConsumerAffairs.com. "We were told by CitiMortgage that we needed to be at least 60 days late on our mortgage payments in order to qualify for a short sell. We had excellent credit scores, and had never missed a payment on anything in our lives. But, in order to qualify for the short sale we stopped making payments and were 90 days late by the time the sale closed. Because of this misinformation, our credit scores have been ruined."

Once your credit score has been damaged, is there any way to restore it? Fortunately, there is.

Arm yourself with information

For starters, pull your credit reports using www.annualcreditreport.com. That's the free government-mandated service, and it does not require you to sign up for any kind of credit monitoring service. It's available free to all U.S. residents once a year.

Once you have your credit report, check it for errors. Your credit report contains the data used to calculate your score and it may contain errors. In particular, check to make sure that there are no late payments incorrectly listed for any of your accounts and that the amounts owed for each of your open accounts is correct. If you find errors on any of your reports, dispute them with the credit bureau and reporting agency.

Next, set up payment reminders for all of your monthly bills. Making your credit payments on time is one of the biggest contributing factors to your credit score.

Banks often offer payment reminders through their online banking systems that can send you an email or text message reminding you when a payment is due. You can also set up automated payments from your account to you don't have to remember to pay he bill.

Easier said than done

Try to reduce the amount of the money you owe. This might seem difficult, but reducing the amount of credit card debt you owe is going to give you the biggest bang for the buck.

Put away your credit cards until you've paid down your balance. If you have an asset that you can sell for cash, do it and apply the money to your debt. Come up with a payment plan that puts most of your available budget for debt payments towards the highest interest cards first, while maintaining minimum payments on your other accounts.

Be very selective about opening new credit accounts. Be wary of arguments that having another credit card will help improve your credit score. If you already have existing debt, it probably won't. And the kinds of credit cards that are marketed to people with poor credit often have low credit limits and very high fees. You could easily end up with an even lower credit score.

There's really no quick, easy way to repair your credit. If a company promises that there is, avoid them like the plague.  

Advice on raising your credit score...

Article Image

Can Credit Card Agreements Be Simpler?

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) is launching a "Know Before You Owe" project aimed at simplifying credit card agreements so that the prices, risks, and terms are easier for consumers to understand.

The CFPB is asking the public to weigh in on a prototype credit card agreement that is shorter, written in plain language, and explains key features upfront. The CFPB also plans to pilot test the prototype with Pentagon Federal Credit Union, one of the largest credit unions in the country, to get on-the-ground consumer feedback.

“Credit cards can be complicated, with many moving parts that impact the cost to consumers,” said Raj Date, the Special Advisor to the Secretary of Treasury on the CFPB. “When a consumer has to read through pages of legal fine print in their credit card agreement to figure out how their card works – it’s easy to get confused. With a short, simple, easy-to-understand credit card agreement, consumers can clearly see the terms of the deal and make the decisions that are right for them.”

514 million

There are an estimated 514 million credit cards in circulation in the United States. Americans used their credit cards to spend an estimated $1.9 trillion in 2010, and credit card debt is estimated at $700 billion dollars.

The CARD Act, which was signed into law more than two years ago, made credit card costs more reliable – with less risk of unexpected rate increases or other charges.

But despite this progress, a recent study by J.D. Power found that roughly two-thirds of cardholders say they don’t completely understand how their cards work. And, as indicated in a recent CFPB report on credit card complaints received by the Bureau from July 21 to October 21, 2011, difficulty understanding the terms of their cards is a contributing factor in many consumer complaints.

Credit card agreements – contracts that consumers receive when they sign up – include information about the costs, features, and terms of the product. But while some companies have made improvements, agreements are often long, complicated, and written in legalese. Key information about interest rates, fees, billing, and payments is often surrounded by legal fine print.

A prototype

Designed to make it easier for consumers to understand their credit cards, the CFPB’s prototype is:

  • Short: The CFPB’s prototype is shorter – its word count is about 1,100 words, while the industry average for a credit card agreement is around 5,000 words.
  • Clear: The draft credit card agreement has an easy-to-read layout and is written in plain language. It is organized into three simple sections: costs, changes, and additional information.
  • Consumer-Friendly: The simplified agreement explains the prices, risks, and features of the credit card upfront, not buried in fine print.
  • Consistent: The prototype establishes standard definitions for legal terms like “card” and “balance transfer” that are contractually necessary but largely uninformative to consumers.

The prototype credit card agreement separates important information about prices, risks, and terms from the legalese by taking much of the legal language and moving it into standard definitions.

In the prototype, the definitions have been formulated by the CFPB based on standard industry usage and practices. To ensure that consumers can easily find these definitions, they will be housed online in a place where consumers can readily access them.

For consumers who do not have Internet access, the definitions will be available from their issuer in printed form. Doing this allows for a plain language document that clearly explains to consumers how the credit card works.

In addition to introducing the draft simplified agreement, the CFPB will host an online database of many existing credit card agreements where consumers can compare their existing agreement with the prototype.

The CARD Act required credit card issuers to provide copies of their credit card agreements to the Federal Reserve so it could maintain a database for consumers. The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act transferred responsibility for this database to the CFPB.

For more information about Know Before You Owe, and to view a copy of the prototype credit card agreement and the database, visit the CFPB’s website.

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) is launching a "Know Before You Owe" project aimed at simplifying credit card agreements so that the pric...

Article Image

Researchers Link Impatience With Credit Problems

If you're struggling with a less than sterling credit score, could the solution be developing more patience?

A new study suggests your problem with money stems from a desire for an immediate reward, rather than waiting for a larger reward later.

Is there a psychological reason why people default on their mortgages? A new study, which will be published in an upcoming issue of Psychological Science finds that people with bad credit scores are more impatient – more likely to choose immediate rewards rather than wait for a larger reward later.

The new paper is by two economists who were working at the Federal Reserve’s Center for Behavioral Economics and Decisionmaking in Boston at the time they did the research. It seems people at the Fed are very interested in understanding how consumers ran up so much credit card debt and took on mortgages they couldn't afford.

Psychological factors

“Most often, the reasons economists put forward are, maybe there was not enough screening for mortgage applicants, or securitization, or other institutional reasons,” said Stephan Meier, who is now at Columbia University. ”That’s definitely important, but in the end humans make those repayment decisions. So there must be more psychological factors that explain how people make those decisions to default or not?”

During tax season, Meier and Charles Sprenger, of Stanford University recruited 437 low-to-moderate income people at a community center in Boston that was offering tax preparation help. Each person was given a questionnaire in which they made choices between a smaller, immediate reward and a larger reward later.

This is a common test for seeing if people are willing to delay gratification. The questions offer different time periods and different amounts. The participants also agreed to let the researchers access their credit scores.

Impatient people had lower credit scores

The results showed impatient people had lower credit scores. A low credit score can indicate some problems with credit in the past, like failing to pay bills or defaulting on a mortgage.

“Conceptually, it does make sense that how people discount the future, i.e. how impatient they are, affects their decision to default on their loans,” Meier said. “Individuals accumulate debt and then have to decide whether to repay the money or use the money for something else?”

If they don’t pay off their debt, they will have short-term benefits – any cash on hand is available for something else – but the costs/problems come much later, when a landlord, mortgage lender, or someone else sees their bad credit report.

Meier acknowledges that defaulting on a loan isn’t always a deliberate choice. People may default because they lose their job, for example.

“But there is a little bit of strategic defaulting going on, where some people make this cost-benefit analysis” – those individuals rather have more money now and deal with the repercussions later," he said.

Researchers Link Impatience With Credit Problems...

Article Image

Do You Know As Much As You Think About Credit Cards?

When the financial crisis of 2008 hit, many consumers found themselves over-extended on their credit cards. Since then, a painful deleveraging process has been taking place.

Two economists at the University of Nebraska – Sam Allgood and William Walstad – wanted to know how a consumer's knowledge about credit cards affected their credit situation. They found that it's not just what you know, but what you think you know, that can make a difference.

For their study, they surveyed roughly 27,500 people nationwide and measured five credit-card behaviors: Paying credit card bills in full; carrying a credit card balance; paying just the minimum payment; paying late fees; and exceeding the card’s limit.

In all cases, respondents who believed they knew and understood credit cards and finances had better credit-card behavior than those who saw their knowledge as low.

Having knowledge and knowing it

For example, the study found, Americans who are actually smart about finance and know it are 15.5 percent more likely to pay their credit card bills in full compared with people with the same level of financial knowledge, but who perceive themselves as not having a high financial expertise.

The low self-perceivers also are 15 percent more likely to carry a monthly balance, 12 percent more likely to merely pay the minimum payment each month, 11 percent more likely to be charged a late fee and six percent more likely to exceed their card’s spending limits.

“Before beginning, we hypothesized two possibilities: people would be over-confident and this would lead them to make bad decisions or that people need confidence to act on the knowledge they possess,” Allgood said. “Our study suggests that it is the latter.

Lack of confidence?

The economists say you must have actual knowledge to make good personal financial decisions, but people don't seem to be willing to act on that knowledge unless they also perceive themselves to be knowledgeable.

The study found that 41 percent of consumers surveyed had both low actual and self-perceived financial knowledge. Twenty-five percent had low actual financial knowledge but thought their knowledge was high; 16 percent had high actual knowledge but perceived their understanding as low; and 18 percent had high actual knowledge and perceived themselves the same way.

Forty-two percent of respondents said they paid their credit card balances in full each month, while 58 percent carried a balance forward.

According to the Federal Reserve, the average consumer has more than three credit cards and carries a balance of more than $15,000.  

Study of credit card knowledge and behavior...

Article Image

What's On Your Mind? Capital One, Thermador

Among the features available on some credit cards is a "payment protection plan," which makes payments in case you lose your income. Teresa, an auto worker in Portage, Mich., said she was glad she had the plan on her Capital One Card when she was laid off from her job.

"When I returned to work I called Capitol One to get the balance owed and was surprised that there was a huge amount that was left," Teresa told ConsumerAffairs.com. "I was at a zero percent when I was laid off, had not used the card and the payment protection was in place. I called and spoke with Capitol One as to why the amount was so high but they did not know why."

Teresa said she spent nearly two weeks working with Capital One tracking down what the payment protection plan had paid on her account and what her balance actually should be. Given the total, she wrote a check and thought the matter was settled.

"Four months after the payment I received a bill by email with triple the amount that was ever owed, and after calling and talking with the reps, I was told they are not allowed to go back to see what happened, not allowed to take ownership of their actions on accounts and the amount that was paid in full is not accepted."

As a result, Teresa said she is being sued for collection with a balance 10 times what it should be. A feature like payment protection is an expensive add on to your monthly bill. Make sure you completely understand how it works because it's clear in Teresa's case it didn't give her the "protection" she thought it did.

Teresa should also consult an attorney.  If she shops around, she can find an experienced litigator who will give her an initial consultation at a reduced rate.

Bad timing

If there's anytime you need your oven to be in tip-top shape, it's the day before Thanksgiving. Alice, of Fairfax, Calif., had a nasty surprise Wednesday evening.

"It's the night before Thanksgiving and my Thermador oven has decided once again not to work," Alice said. "I cannot read an error code for it because that has not worked in over a year. When I tried to have that fixed the technician said Thermador no longer makes that part. This product is 15 years old. The oven my mother used when I was growing up is still working and she has been dead for more than 15 years."

Needless to say, there aren't many repairmen available the night before Thanksgiving.  

Here is what's on consumer's minds today: Capital One, Thermador, Bad timing and the payment protection plan....

Article Image

Consumer Groups Want Stronger Protection for Prepaid Card Users

Consumer groups urged the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) today to require prepaid card issuers to provide consumers with the same kinds of protections they get when using a traditional debit card linked to a bank account.

“As the cost of bank accounts continue to rise, more and more consumers are turning to prepaid cards as an alternative,” said Michelle Jun, senior attorney for Consumers Union, the advocacy arm of Consumer Reports. “But prepaid cards offer weaker protections than bank accounts and can be loaded with hidden fees that make them costly to use.

"Prepaid card issuers should be required to provide consumers with the same mandatory protections that come with traditional debit cards and to clearly disclose all fees so consumers know these costs up front,” Jun said.

Many consumers are relying on general purpose, reloadable prepaid cards to manage their finances and make purchases. However, consumers who rely on prepaid cards are only entitled to voluntary protections provided by card issuers when cards are lost or stolen and used to make unauthorized charges.

Loopholes

Those voluntary protections come with loopholes and could be subject to change at any time. Prepaid card fees often are poorly disclosed and can make the cost of using these cards much higher than anticipated by consumers.

The letter submitted to the CFPB was signed by Consumers Union, Center for Public Policy Priorities, Center for Responsible Lending, Coalition of Religious Communities, National Consumer Law Center, SC Appleseed Legal Justice Center, and U.S. PIRG.

The groups called on the CFPB to enact a number of mandatory protections for consumers using prepaid cards, including:

• a cap on how much money consumers can lose if their card is lost or stolen or when unauthorized charges are made;

• a guarantee that missing money will be recredited promptly and no later than 10 business days after the consumer reports it;

• clear and conspicuous disclosures of all fees before the consumer signs up to use the card;

• the right to receive a statement or other forms of transaction information; and

• a prohibition on overdraft fees for all prepaid cards.

Consumer groups urged the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) today to require prepaid card issuers to provide consumers with the same kinds of pro...

Article Image

American Express Offers $25 Credit On 'Small Business Saturday'

To help pump money into small, independently owned businesses that accept the American Express Card, American Express is offering consumers a $25 credit when they use the card at participating businesses on Nov. 26, the Saturday after Thanksgiving.

American Express created Small Business Saturday last year in response to struggling small business owners' effort to create more demand for their products and services. A total of 1.5 million Facebook users, 130 public and private organizations, and 41 elected officials declared their support for Small Business Saturday last year.

Building on last year's effort

The company said more than 100,000 small businesses downloaded marketing materials, 10,000 businesses signed up for free Facebook advertising that ran on Small Business Saturday, and 200,000 consumers registered their American Express cards to receive $25 statement credits when they shopped at a small business on SBS.

Small retailers who accept the American Express Card saw a 28 percent increase in sales on Small Business Saturday when compared to the Saturday after Thanksgiving in 2009, according to American Express.

This year, participation works the same way. Consumers who go to American Express's Facebook page can register their American Express cards. Then on Nov. 26, they simply make a purchase at an eligible small business and will receive a credit of up to $25 on their next American Express bill. Once you register your card, you can enter your zip code and see a list of eligible merchants.

FedEx joins in

Meanwhile, Federal Express has announced it is committing $1 million to the small business promotion by purchasing 30,000 American Express gift cards, good at small independently-owned businesses, and giving them away in a Facebook promotion.

Ten thousand additional cards will be distributed directly to FedEx customers. The company said the contribution means more money in the cash registers of locally-owned independent businesses during the holiday season.

"A vibrant small business community is critical to the health of the US economy and the cornerstone of the thousands of cities and towns FedEx serves every day," said T. Michael Glenn, executive vice president of Market Development at FedEx. "Through this commitment, FedEx is able to help raise awareness for Small Business Saturday as well as put money directly into the pockets of consumers while reminding them to support their local businesses during the holidays."

American Express released an online survey showing 38 percent of consumers said they planned to to shop for holiday gifts at small, independently owned, retailers by participating in the second annual Small Business Saturday on November 26.

American Express' Small Business Saturday is November 26...

Article Image

Review Your Credit Card Bill For Surprise Charges

How closely do you review your credit card bills before paying them? If you don't look closely, you could be paying bogus charges month after month without realizing it.

"We didn't sign up for anything and have had monthly charges of $27.95 to $35.95 from MPQ Privacy Matters since September 2009, ever since we opened up our business credit card," Kim of Dallas told ConsumerAffairs.com. "We have no idea how it appeared. Since we do large amounts of business expenses on our credit card we didn't notice it until November 2011."

Suzy of Los Angeles, has been a big fan of Netflix since 2006 and two years ago, purchased a six-month subscription for her elderly parents.

"I only just found out yesterday that the six-month gift subscription that I thought ended after the time I agreed to pay for, has been charging my credit card every month for over two years," Suzy said.

Richard, of Castroville, Calif., gave his credit card information to set up an account on MyLife.com.

"I saw on their site that seven females were looking for me," Richard said. "Hope springing eternal, I took the bait and signed up for an account, which would be billed monthly if I did not cancel. I knew none of these females, who suspiciously were all in their 20's and attractive. I called and cancelled the service after taking a look. I just looked at my credit card statements and saw that they have been charging me $21.95/month ever since."

Why do so many consumers miss seeing these charges for months? If you have dozens of purchases each month, they might not jump out. Also, now that more people receive and pay their bills online, they don't always look closely.

The lesson that Kim, Suzy and Richard have all learned is that you have to read your credit card bill carefully each and every month.

Consumers should closely review credit card bills each month...

Article Image

Information On Bill May Affect Credit Card Payments

How much do you pay on your credit card bill each month? The entire balance, the minimum payment, or something in between?

Your payment probably has a lot to do with your financial circumstances and your money management philosophy, but a new study suggests there is another factor at work.

International researchers say they found credit card customers will pay less if the bill lists information about the minimum amount due. According to Boston College Professor of Marketing Kay Lemon and Assistant Professor Linda Salisbury, it can reduce the amount they pay each month by as much as 24 percent – about $120 less on a $2,000 balance.

Too much information

“The mere presence of minimum payment information acts like an anchor on borrowers’ repayments, pulling them downward,” said Salisbury. “This presents a tricky balancing act for lenders; removing the minimum required payment may increase repayments overall, but it would also put lenders at greater risk of increasing default levels.”

The findings are based on surveys of more than 500 U.S. consumers and an analysis of anonymous data for more than 100,000 British cardholders from 11 different lenders.

Average household credit card debt is around $10,000. Those who have a high interest rate and make only the minimum payment each month might never pay down the balance.

Counterproductive?

The U.S. government now requires lenders to include a range of debt and repayment information with monthly statements. The researchers wondered if providing that information actually motivates consumers to pay down their debt.

The study found that increasing the minimum required payment – typically from two percent to five percent of the loan balance – actually had a positive effect on repayment for most consumers. However, that alone wasn’t enough to overcome the negative effects of posting the minimum required payment, according to the researchers from Boston College and the University of Warwick, University of Essex and University College London, all in the United Kingdom.

In addition, displaying information like payment scenario timelines and potential long-term interest costs – as is now required on US credit card statements – did not encourage increased payments. In fact, disclosing future interest costs significantly increased the likelihood a cardholder would pay only the minimum required.

It may be that some borrowers pay the minimum each month because that's all they can afford to pay. Before the CARD act went into effect, some credit card companies jacked up interest rates on existing balances, causing minimum payments to rise and in some cases, balances to grow.

Information On Bill May Affect Credit Card Payments...

Article Image

Buying With Plastic Just Might Extend Your Warranty

This seems to happen a lot. A consumer purchases an expensive item, like a major appliance or a large screen TV. Shortly after the manufacturer's warranty expires, the product breaks down, requiring a major repair.

“Shortly after the one year warranty expired on our Kenmore 400 Washer, it began tearing holes in items,” Layne, of Los Angeles, told ConsumerAffairs.com. “The washer seems to enjoy eating jeans, boxer shorts, shirts, my wife's bras, and our blankets. After 14 months the washer no longer functions as it was described. I tried to reach out to the manufacturer, but to no avail.”

Layne says the best he could get from the manufacturer was the offer of a $50 gift card. The fact that the problems occurred just outside the warranty period just seems to make the matter worse.

Extended warranties have limitations

While some consumers seek to protect themselves by purchasing expensive extended service contracts, there are problems with that. One alternative is to make the purchase with a credit card that automatically provides extended coverage. In fact, this may be the most overlooked consumer protection available.

American Express has offered this kind of coverage for years. According to American Express, charge your covered purchases to the card and Extended Warranty will extend the terms of the original manufacturer's warranty for up to one additional year on eligible purchases. For example if you have a six-month manufacturer's warranty, we will add another six months. If you have a one-year manufacturer's warranty we will add one additional year.

The American Express coverage is good for the amount charged to your card for the item or $10,000, whichever is less, not to exceed $50,000 per cardmember account per policy year. Significantly better than a $50 gift card.

If Layne had purchased the washer with an American Express card, he would simply lot into the company's claim center and file a claim.

Other cards work too

Don't have an American Express card? Visa has a very similar extended warranty. To take advantage of this service a Visa credit card user only needs to use their Visa card to purchase an item that has its own warranty coverage and send in the warranty card.

When the item is out of warranty, the Visa warranty kicks in for an identical period of coverage. If the product breaks or is found to be defective, Visa will credit the purchase price back to the consumers credit card.

Mastercard's Peace of Mind Protection Plan offers very similar coverage on some – but not all - of its cards. In addition, it also provides a satisfaction guarantee.

Target won't accept your return? If you become dissatisfied with a product you purchase using your eligible MasterCard card within 60 days of purchase, and the store will not accept a return, you may be eligible for a refund for the cost of the product up to $250.

If find out if your card contains this coverage, read the credit card agreement that came with your card or call Mastercard's customer service department.

many credit cards carry extended warranty protection...

Article Image

What's On Your Mind? US Search, Dish Network, Avis

When you see an advertisement on the web for a product sample or trial offer that only requires a payment of a dollar or two, it pays to be very, very wary. JoAnn, of Rochester, Minn., said she agreed to a one-time debit from her bank account of $9.95, only to discover US Search had made two additional withdrawls of $19.95.

“I cancelled their service last night within hours of receiving my report, which, in fact, was not the information I requested,” JoAnn told ConsumerAffairs.com. “I have tried to call them but no answer. I have sent them three emails, my account has been closed, but I have not heard back from them re the two bogus $19.95 charges.”

Advice for JoAnn comes from another of our readers, Jeff, of Henderson, Colo., who says he encountered a similar problem with US Search.

“I called the 800 number again and a gentleman answered the phone and transferred me to another person. I told him my dilemma and after he spoke with his supervisor, he came back to tell me that they had no record of my first call to cancel my membership and all of their information for the background checks is acquired from free government sites that are available to all. When I told him that I would dispute the fraudulent charges with my credit card, he changed his story and all of a sudden, he saw the first time I called and cancelled my membership and told me that he would reverse the charge. I went to these free sites in the meantime and found the information I was looking for but this time, it was correct plus it was complete.

And consumers should also remember that when you agree to allow a company to charge your credit card for a small amount, they have the ability to take larger amounts and require you to jump through the necessary hoops to dispute the extra charges. Companies that use trial offers to promote a more expensive service are required to clearly state the terms to consumers. Consumers need to read all the fine print before they take advantage of these offers.

Adjustment needed

Carey, of Newton, Mass., sent us a copy of a complaint he directed to the Attorney General of Massachusetts regarding Dish Network.

“Apparently, they are incapable of delivering a signal when it rains or snows,” Carey said. “However, this bit of information was never communicated to me or any customer of theirs that I have talked to. Given the weather here in Massachusetts and other states where it rains and snows it seems unreasonable for them not to alert customers prior to signing a 2 year contract with a $400 early termination fee.”

Satellite reception is subject to interruption by snow and rain drops, especially as one gets farther from the equator.  It's not that the signal is not being sent but rather that it's being blocked by the snow flakes or rain drops.  This is simply a fact of life, sorry to say.

How long does it take to discover damage to a rental car?

Cathy, of Redwood City, Calif., is another rental car customer who has been informed she is liable for damage to her car, informed of this only after turning it in.

“I rent from Avis all the time,”Cathy told ConsumerAffairs.com. “However, after returning from a trip, I have mail from them stating the car I rented, while I rented it, was in an accident. I assure you, I never had an accident."

Cathy says she spends about $1,000 a month with Avis, and that fact might well give her some leverage as she tries to contest the accusation that she damaged the vehicle. However, she will need to escalate the matter to a higher level within Avis.

Meanwhile, one way to eliminate this growing consumer complaint is to require rental companies to inspect all returned vehicles in the presence of the returning customer. If there is damage, the customer could be assessed a fee on the spot. If not, the consumer wouldn't get a nasty surprise weeks later, and have the feeling they are being conned.

Here is what's on consumer's minds today: US Search, Dish Network, Avis, Adjustment needed and How long does it take to discover damage to a rental car?...

Article Image

Credit Scores Go Behavioral

Will you take your medicine tomorrow?  You may not know but Fair Isaac thinks it does.

The company that invented the FICO credit score is now branching out and adopting some of the behavior-prediction methodologies used by Web advertisers, but with potentially more far-reaching effect.

After all, if you don't like a behaviorally-targeted ad, you can just skip it.  But Fair Isaac will be selling its new behavior scores to insurance companies, lenders and others whose decisions can have a big effect on your finances, your employment prospects and even your health.

The Medication Adherence Score is Fair Isaac's latest product.  It tries to measure the likelihood that you'll take your prescriptions on time.  How can it know that?  Good question. 

The company is understandably not very forthcoming about its methods but says it draws conclusions based on massive amounts of data it gathers about each of us, including such seemingly benign data as how long we've lived at the same address, whether we own a car, our marital status, employment, and so forth.

Can this be legal?

You might think this can't possibly be legal.  Well, so far it is.  In fact, some of the new scores don't even fall under existing laws that require credit-rating companies to disclose what they know about us.

That's not likely to last long though, as politicians and regulators are even now beginning to paw the ground and snort loudly as they get a whiff of what's afoot out in the wild world of data-gathering.

In fact, much of the data that Fair Isaac, Experian and other companies are gathering isn't even about us personally.  It's based on massive aggregations of data that, in theory anyway, tell us how people like us are likely to act.

For example, one new Experian score seeks to measure disposable income.  It doesn't go line by line through each household's income and outflow but bases its predictions on an analysis of large numbers of people whose situation is roughly equivalent.

Privacy advocates don't like any of this very much.  They say it's invasive and may not even be accurate.

But the credit companies say it actually "empowers" consumers by making it easier for lenders, employers and others to snoop around in our affairs.

That may be a tough sell if Congress ever gets around to putting on one of its show trials but for now, the business of nosing around in your affairs is booming.

Will you take your medicine tomorrow?  You may not know but Fair Isaac thinks it does.The company that invented the FICO credit score is now branchi...

Article Image

What's On Your Mind? CheapTickets.com, Priceline, Chase Mortgage

Mysterious unauthorized charges on your credit card bill can be infuriating, and they usually require some effort to get them removed. Don, of Denver, recently avoided one, but just barely.

“I got an email from my credit card company indicating that CheapTickets.com tried to charge my card $6.99,” Don told ConsumerAffairs.com. “I never authorized such a charge, and when I called Cheaptickets for an explanation, and how they got my card number, they refused to answer my questions, and evenutally they hung up on me. I never made a purchase on their site, nor even attempted to do so.”

This is how a situation like this could have happened: Cheaptickets.com most likely had a third-party marketing arrangement with another company, allowing them to market to that company's customers at the end of a transaction. While the law makes clear that these offers must carrying “clear and conspicuous terms,” many don't. And consumers would likely overlook them if they did.

In Don's case, he probably had just finished a transaction with Company A, in which he had used his credit card. When a pop-up “free” offer from a company like CheapTickets.com came along, he had no reason to believe that company could charge his credit card. What he didn't know is that third party marketing agreement gives CheapTickets access to Don's credit card information that he gave to Company A. Don didn't mention who his credit card company is but they deserve a shout-out for catching this before it happened.

No changes

Online travel booking sites have been around for more than ten years but some consumers still don't understand how they work. For example, RB, of Salt Lake City, Utah., was confused and angry when she couldn't change a reservation

“I rented a car through Priceline for a trip to Tennessee,” RB said. “My work schedule changed and I could not travel on the original dates, so I called to see if the car rental company could change the reservation. They told me I would have to contact Priceline. I called Priceline and supposedly spoke with a supervisor. They refused to help as well. They said there is no way to change or delete a reservation.”

Sorry, RB.  This is pretty much standard operating procedure. In exchange for a discount, you give up the right to cancel or modify your reservation. Thats why, if you think your plans are subject to change, you should always book directly with the hotel, airline or rental car company.

Slow response

Mogli, of Glennwood Springs, Colo., has a somewhat unusual problem. He paid off the first lien on his Washington Mutual mortgage in 2002 but in the almost decade since, has not been able to obtain a release.

“The title company that paid off the mortgage has been trying to obtain a release for a first lien DOT since January 28, 2002, almost ten years,” Mogli told ConsumerAffairs.com. “To date we have not received a release from Chase, even though they submitted plenty of proof of payment in full on January 28, 2002. Back then it was Washington Mutual. What to do?”

This sounds like a tough one because a lot of years have passed and the original company has been sold. But if Mogli still has his loan account number, he should try contacting Chase Mortgage, which acquired Washington Mutual, and request a copy of his last loan statement. That document should show a zero balance, which might convince someone at Chase to send out the release. Mogli needs to clear this up before he can refinance his property.

Here is what's on consumer's minds today: CheapTickets.com, Priceline, Chase Mortgage, No changes and Slow response....

Article Image

What's On Your Mind? American Express, Just Flowers, Green Dot, Sears Optical

Everyone loves rewards associated with credit cards, but lately some consumers are expressing disappointment with the rewards that come in the form of airline travel.

“In June 2011, I attempted to redeem my 'Free Travel Companion Certificate' from American Express for a flight in March 2012, nine months in advance of flying,” Gerald, or Anaheim, Calif., told ConsumerAffairs.com. “I was advised no seats were available. I have only been able to use this 'Free Travel Companion Certificate' once out of three years. How far in advance of flying does one need to make reservations in order to use this 'benefit' of the costly Platinum Card?”

Not all rewards cards are created equal, and when it comes to air travel some have more blackout dates that others. Something to check into before committing to a card if the air travel rewards are important to you.

Cut out the middleman

Michelle, of Murfreesboro, Tenn., used Just Flowers to send flowers to her uncle on his 90th birthday. But the transaction didn't go without a snag.

“Just Flowers told me that my flowers were delivered but the floral company that was to deliver the flowers accidentally called me and said that the flowers were not delivered because they could not find the location,” Michelle said.

Michelle might have avoided the potential embarrassment by cutting out the middleman and dealing directly with a local florist.

Manage your card

With Bank of America adding a $5 monthly charge using a debit card, some consumers might be thinking of switching to a prepaid card like Green Dot. But keep in mind these cards also carry charges, and must be carefully managed.

“I have a green dot card I got last year,” Bill, of Ofallon, Mo., told ConsumerAffairs.com. “Last year, I put on the card like $50, bought some stuff online, spent all the money and it was all good. So I had the card all these months with zero dollars on it, or so I thought. I went to put some money on it, and only 10 bucks made it onto my account. It seems that they charge $5 a month for the card even when its empty, meaning to put any money on the card I'd have to pay off like $40.

Bill thinks it's unfair, but almost all prepaid cards carry a monthly service charge, whether you use the card or not. But sure to read the terms and conditions carefully before you apply.

Frustrated

When you order a specially-made product but change your mind, can you get your money back? Kim, of Carl Junction, Mo., recounts the story of her husband's attempt to get new classes at Sears Optical. After an extended wait of several weeks, she said the glasses finally arrived.

“He goes to get them and the same girl adjusts them and they seem to be fitting fine and then she goes to clean them,” Kim said. “She asks after she cleans them if they're his lenses and he said you told me they were and she said they are smudged - the AR (anti-reflective) was coming off. She'd have to order him more lenses, they'd arrive in two to three weeks. He says forget it - he wants his money back. She said she can't do that without a managers permission.”

Kim's husband certainly is within his rights to request a refund as he had not yet taken possession of the glasses and the company had damaged them. The company might drag its feet – no one likes to refund money – but Kim's husband needs to stick to his guns.  

Here is what's on consumer's minds today: American Express, Just Flowers, Green Dot, Sears Optical, Cut out the middleman and Manage your card....

Article Image

Free Debit Cards Aren't Extinct, Or Even Hard to Find

Mounted police push back protesters in Lower Manhattan. Photo: OccupyWallStreet.org

With American consumers taking to the streets to protest the sluggish economy and moribund job market, it's not a good time for politicians, big banks and major corporations to try to stay about the fray.  Yet that seems to be exactly what they're doing.

Bank of America's decision to get even with Congress and its customers by slapping a $5 monthly fee on debit card users has done more damage to the bank's reputation in just a few short weeks than the agonzingly drawn-out Countrywide Mortgage fiasco.

Consumers have not sacked and burned BA branches, not yet anyway, but many thousands have said they will close their BA accounts and go elsewhere.

The question thus becomes: where can those disgruntled banking customers  go to find free or reasonably-priced checking accounts that include online banking and a debit card?

The options are literally too numerous to list but we rounded up  a few of the more obvious ones.  Keep in mind that all banks have multiple plans that depend in great part on how much money you're willing and able to keep in your account.

If you can keep $5,000 or more on deposit, most big banks will welcome you with free or inexpensive plans. If you can't or won't do that, prepare to be charged for just about everything -- or look for a smaller bank or credit union that's hungrier for business.  There are thousands of them out there, just waiting for you to come through the door.

And just to prove it, here is a tiny but representative sample of banks that offer free debit cards on at least some of their account plans.  Keep in mind, plans differ by state and you must read the terms carefully. Banks have numerous plans, so be sure you know which one you're getting.

Large Banks

  • Ally The former GMAC, Ally is an online bank offering free debit cards, free onling banking, and free checking accounts.  The Ally Perks plan pays a small bonus each time you use the debit card to make an online purchase or at participating retailers.   
  • Capital One  Once just a credit card issuer, Capital One has bought up several regional banks and is aggressively pursuing new customers.  It offers  at least one checking account that includes a free debit card, no monthly fee and free currency exchange services for overseas transactions.   
  • Chase You can get a free debit card and free online banking if you keep a minimum balance of $1,500 or have direct deposits of $500 or more made to the account.  Higher balances will get you more freebies.  
  • PNC Bank  PNC's Virtual Wallet Plus plan offers free debit cards as well as limited free checking, online banking, interest-bearing checking and a savings account.  Read the terms carefully; nothing in life is completely free.
  • Provident Bank A free debit card is available with several of its checking plans, which offer free checking with an monthly average balance of as little as $500. 

Local Banks

Just because we're all drowning in advertising from huge banks doesn't mean we shouldn't patronize -- or at least check out -- local banks.  They often offer much better terms than the big guys and tend to provide more personal service.

Here are just a few local banks we picked at random:

  • Community Bank & Trust, Sheboygan, Wis., offers a free personal checking account with no minimum balance requirement, including an ATM and debit card.
  • Community Bank of DuPage, DuPage, Ill., offers free checking with no minimum balance. Includes free online banking and debit card.
  • Shore Community Bank, Toms River, N.J.  It's the Jersey Shore, up close and personal.  This local bank provides free regular checking with no minimum balance requirement, free online banking and free debit card.  Hey, you got a problem with that?

Credit Unions

Credit unions are non-profit organizations that originally offered memberships to very specific groups -- employees of a local municipality, federal workers, etc. But these days, many credit unions have much more liberal membership standards. They are often the best source of loans, checking, credit card and savings accounts.

To find a credit union near you, visit the National Credit Union Association site. Enter your state and Zip code in the Find a Credit Union form and, chances are, you'll find one near you.  You can then check eligibility requirements and look over what the CU offers.

In Burbank, California, for example, we found the UMe (you & me, get it?) Credit Union.  Originally chartered to serve local school teachers, it now has about 12,000 members who live, work or worship in Burbank or attend school or belong to an organization that's headquartered there.

UMe offers free checking if you sign up for paperless statements or are 60 years of age or older.  The personal checking account includes a free Visa debit card, unlimited check writing and pays interest on account balances over $2,500, as well as dog treats for your dog and bottled water for you whenever you visit a branch.

It's a big country ...

We like cable news and the Internet as much as anyone but one result of the so-called information explosion is that there is a lot more national news and chatter than there used to be and less attention to local and regional goings-on.

It's easy to sit at home in front of the tube and get riled up at Bank of America, but take a look out your back door and you'll probably find a couple of local banks and credit unions a few minutes away.  Go introduce yourself and see what they'll do to win your business.  You might be surprised.  

With American consumers taking to the streets to protest the sluggish economy and moribund job market, it's not a good time for politicians, banks and big ...

Article Image

What's On Your Mind? Trilegiant, Fancy Feast, Response Mortgage, Best Buy

Trilegiant is one of those companies that handle those promotional “free” offers on the Internet that end up charging your credit card each month for something you didn't ask for and don't want. John, of Wurstboro, Conn., has just realized that Trilegiant has been charging his credit card each month for several years.

“I called my credit card company and they told me the only way to get this fraud to stop was to cancel the card they were charging and they would send me a new one,” John told ConsumerAffairs.com. “I did that. They showed up on my next bill with the new card. I finally contacted the Connecticut Better Business Bureau who assured me that this nonsense would cease. I'm now monitoring my bills much more closely. Shame on me for not doing it sooner.”

John is right to feel sheepish for not noticing the unauthorized charge sooner, but he is mistaken if he thinks the Better Business Bureau can do anything about his problem. It can't. But maybe a call to Connecticut Attorney General George Jepsen's office might help. And as for the charge showing up on the new credit card, that probably happened because the credit card company didn't change the number on the account. In a fraud case, they should have.

Smelly food

Kathryn, of Nashville, Tenn., feeds her cats Fancy Feast Tender Beef Classics because one cat is diabetic and it's all he can eat. Lately, Kathryn says the food has a much different smell, but says Purina told her nothing has changed.

“My other cat will not even come near the food,” Kathryn said. “I used to give her a little bit of it every morning - and she won't even come near it now. Thank god my other cat is still eating it and he is fine - but I just want to know why this smells the way it does now. This is the only thing my cat can eat. If they've changed something, I need to know!”

Kathryn needs to take a can of the food, with the label listing the ingredients, to her vet and get a professional opinion. And if any other cat owners have some advice for Kathryn on this topic, let us know.

Strange one

We get lots of complaints about mortgages. This one, about Response Mortgage Services, is a little different.

“Two weeks prior to closing I was instructed to pay for a home inspection,” Charles, of College Place, Ore., told ConsumerAffairs.com. “Several days later I tried to inform the loan officer of the results and found that the loan officer switched employers and cancelled my loan. Never notified anyone, accused her employer of the action and has been unavailable ever since. The two banks she worked for have made it clear that this was her action alone.'

This is indeed odd, but appears to be the action of one individual. Surely Charles is entitled to knowing why his mortgage, which obviously had been approved, was suddenly cancelled. If no good reason is forthcoming, he should be able to complete the process with another loan officer.

Not what he thought it was

We're not big fans of cell phone insurance policies, but as expensive as these devices are, we understand why people buy them. Only some people don't realize what they're actually buying. George, of Bordentown, N.J., says he bought his wife an iPhone 4 back in May at Best Buy, and was talked into buying the Best Buy insurance, with the sale rep telling him theirs was superior to Verizon's because they replace phones with new ones, not refurbished ones.

“Well my wife's ihome button stopped responding,” George said. “So I took it to Best Buy and explained to them what happened. They in turned told me I have to give it to GeekSquad for repair. When I told them about the insurance they said I was misinformed and they don't replace phones, they send them out to be fixed. They said I would also have to pay $150 as a deposit for a loner phone. When I asked to see that phone I was shown a flip phone. Are you kidding me!! A $600 phone, and you give me a four year old flip phone that is free? I spend 16 bucks a month for this insurance policy, and for what?”

That would have been a question to ask before buying the insurance. Keep in mind that $16 a month over a two year contract is $384. That would go a long way toward purchasing a new phone.

Here is what's on consumer's minds today: Trilegiant, Fancy Feast, Response Mortgage, Best Buy, Smelly food, Strange one and Not what he thought it was....

Article Image

Consumer Credit Rises in July

American consumers used more credit in July, according to the latest accounting by the Federal Reserve.

Despite a weak economy, consumers were willing to increase their credit spending by nearly $12 billion. Non-revolving credit, which includes auto loans and loans for educational purposes jumped $15.4 billion.

However, that was offset by a $3.44 billion decline in credit card spending. The revolving portion of consumer credit, which includes credit cards, $792.5 billion after the five percent decline.

Since the credit meltdown of late 2008, consumers have generally been scaling back their credit card purchases, and in many cases it hasn't been voluntarily. Early in 2009 many credit card issuers began an aggressive campaign to lower credit limits and, in some cases, close consumers' credit card accounts.

At the same time, many consumers have begun making more prudent use of credit cards and many consumers have curtailed spending in general. While credit card use rose in May and June, some analysts think July's numbers represent a return to “normal” activity.

The drop in credit card spending in July coincides with other economic data that emerged during the month suggesting the U.S. economy was slowing again. If consumers are becoming more cautious about spending, and about adding to their credit card balances, it could present some serious headwind for the recovering economy.

According to the Fed's figures, credit card debt peaked in 2008 at $957.5 billion. It is now 17.2 percent lower, a sign that consumers continue to pay down their credit card balances.

Consumer credit rose in July 2011...

Article Image

What's On Your Mind? Capital One, National Lottery Board, Tronix Country, Sprint

R, of Clifton Springs, N.Y., along with her husband, recently applied for "no hassle" credit cards from Capital One, thinking they'd be convenient and easy to use. The very first month, she says, their bills arrived in the mail, with no delay by the post office, judging by the postmark, just one day short of the due date for payment!

“Although we mailed our payment the same day, we were charged late fees,” R told ConsumerAffairs.com. “When we contacted the company to complain and ask why our bills were not mailed to us until it was already too late for us to timely pay, we were told that the company does not take responsibility for the timing of billing and refused to cancel the late charges!”

But hold on. The CARD Act, which took effect February 22, 2010, requires issuers to give card account holders "a reasonable amount of time" to make payments on monthly bills. One day probably isn't going to pass that test.

Interestingly, R says the Capital One rep suggested it would be best if she just paid the late fee in order to retain her good credit.  If R still retains the statement envelop with the postmark, she should send a copy of it, along with her complaint, to the new Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.

Lottery scam

Look out for this scam: a caller from the “National Lottery Board” tells you the good news that you have won a big prize. But to collect is going to cost ya.

“He says I won some money but I need to send $2,000 to U.S. Customs, in order to receive the money, because it is coming from Costa Rica and any money coming in or out of the country requires a fee,” said Lashun, of Inglewood, Calif.

Hopefully Laushun didn't send the money. If so, it's money down the drain. Remember, you can't win a lottery you didn't enter.

Stop the payments

Dealing with the death of a parent is never easy, particularly when there are financial matters you don't expect. Danielle, of Montgomery, Ala., said she had a bad experience with Tronix Country when she learned her late father had an account with the company.

"Tronix has been taking money from my father's account and I notified them he passed and that I had a couple of questions for the manager,” Danielle told ConsumerAffairs.com. “To my dismay they wouldn't tell me who they were or what they did because i didn't know at the time. They refuse to let me speak to a manager or cancel his account.”

Tronix Country is a finance company for people with poor or little credit, specializing in financing computers and TV sets. They have a business model similar to Blue Hippo, which went out of business following a number of lawsuits. Chances are, Danielle's father had been making payments on equipment he had yet to receive. Danielle should close her father's bank account, or place a block on further withdrawals, as soon as possible.

Bad assumption

A cell phone is a lot like a credit card. If you lose it, someone else can use it to run up charges on your account. Fior, of the Bronx, N.Y., lost his cell phone shortly after cancelling his Sprint account. He didn't worry about it since he had just closed his account.

“When I received my bill I noticed that I have an $88.00 charge of data roaming in the Dominican Republic,” Fior said. “I called Sprint for an explanation and they said that someone may have used that device in the Dominican Republic. I told them that couldn't have happened because I cancelled my service on Jul. 27 and who ever used that device used it on August 2nd.”

That's when Fior learned his account remained active through the billing cycle, which ended August 24. When cancelling a mobile phone account, make sure you know when the account goes off line and protect your mobile devices until then.

Here is what's on consumer's minds today: Capital One, National Lottery Board, Tronix Country, Sprint, Lottery scam, Stop the payments and Bad assumption....

Article Image

What's On Your Mind? Hampton Bay, PeopleFinder.com, Western Renewal Service

Where there's smoke

Alan, of Anderson, Calif., reports what he thinks is a dangerous problem with his Hampton Bay ceiling fan, which he says he bought several years ago.

“The blades would not balance out, and Thursday, at 1:30 am, my daughters smelled plastic burning, they found the ceiling fan had stopped turning and when they turned on the lights there was smoke coming out above the light kit,” Alan said. “After being woke up I took it apart to find the motor had shorted and a bridge had melted above the light kit. Had this not been caught in time we would have lost our house to a fire.”

It might be worth noting than in late 2009, Hampton Bay recalled 2000 dehumidifiers because of a potential fire hazard. In any event, Alan should also report it to the Consumer Product Safety Commission, just in case there are other incidents reported.

Expensive information

How much would you pay to look up someone's phone number? Some people agree to pay a small fee to online services for this, only to find they have been enrolled in a membership with a larger, recurring charge.

“I paid PeopleFinder.com with a credit card,” Sherri, of Pangburn, Ark., told ConsumerAffairs.com. “It states you pay a one time fee of $4.95 to look up one number and you will receive information, name & address of who owns the phone of the phone number you are looking up. I got charged $4.94 plus $2.99 and NO name or address. When I call PeopleFinder.com they said it was not refundable.”

It's perfectly legal to sell this information but consumers like Sherri should realize there are free services, such as Switchboard.com, out there too.

Too much information

Western Renewal Service sells magazine subscriptions and has drawn a number of complaints from consumers, who say they are being charged for magazines they didn't order.

“The company stated I had either signed up for a 30 month subscription or signed up for that same subscription through a promotion in May 2011,” Chris, of Staten Island, N.Y., told ConsumerAffairs.com. “I had 30 days to cancel the subscription but I learned about this for the first time on August 16th, 2011. The company said there was no way to cancel this service. I either had to pay $69.90 a month for 30 months or agree to $39.90 a month for 30 months. I requested more information on when and where i signed up for this. They stated i had to sign up for the subscription and they would give me the info about "the mainframe company". I was forced against my will to agree in order to find out this information.”

Ouch! Chris made an unforced error when he agreed to the outrageous demand that he “sign up” in exchange for getting the information to which he is entitled. In effect, he agreed to legitimize what was, in all likelihood, an unauthorized charge.

Consumers should remain wary. Other complaints about this company indicate they get the consumer's credit card information through third-party marketing agreements with other companies. Be very careful during online transactions. Don't Accept “free” offers or extra “discounts,” as that could be how you get signed up for a subscription.

Here is what's on consumer's minds today: Hampton Bay, PeopleFinder.com, Western Renewal Service, Expensive information and Too much information....

Article Image

What's On Your Mind? Citibank, AT&T, Lexus

It seems no good behavior goes unpunished. At least, that's how Pam, of Winder, Ga., feels.

"Right before the credit card law went into effect Citibank raised my interest rate to 29.99% even though we have never been late paying them,” Pam told ConsumerAffairs.com. “When I complained about it I was told that they have to make money someway. They said a lot of people are defaulting on their credit card so they have to raise the interest rate on the ones that pay their bills. With that the payments also raised and now I can hardly pay my bills. If I paid late I could understand but I always pay on time.”

Two years ago the credit card companies did the math and took action to cushion what they expected to be a very high default rate during the recession. A lot of people like Pam, who had a manageable balance with their old rate, now have trouble paying their bills. It's a shame that carrying a credit card balance became the norm among consumers, because it's among the most toxic debt.

Beyond the grave

With intense focus on the bottom line, some companies apparently pressure their personnel to collect every dime that is owed, even if the debtor isn't around anymore. Sharp, of San Antonio, Tex., says his brother was killed in a car accident in May.

“My parents contacted AT&T June 13 to let them know he had passed and would no longer need their services,” Sharp said. “My mom was told by Dwayne, the billing specialist, that she needed to take care of a $321.13 phone bill that belonged to my brother. My mom told Dwayne she would not be paying for the bill and she was then told that the bill would be sent to collections and that my parents would then be held responsible for the bill.”

Sharp's parents aren't liable for their deceased son's cell phone bill, unless their names are also on the account -- and assuming the deceased lad was an adult. Instead, AT&T will probably have to collect it from Sharp's brother's estate. If the estate has no assets, then AT&T is out of luck.

Lawyers have a saying: death relieves all obligations.  

Not a cheap fix

Lexus, of course, is a highly regarded luxury car and many owners are very happy with them. But that's not to say there aren't exceptions.

“I started having 'resetting' of the navigation system in my 2006 RX330 about six weeks ago, with the issue occurring about every 1.5 hours,” David, of Henderson, Nev., told ConsumerAffairs.com. “Now - it happens every 1.5 minutes. The issue does not interfere with the operation of the vehicle, but it is most annoying. Each time the system resets, the audio system is momentarily interrupted but the hands-free Bluetooth connection is killed, rendering it useless. I went to the Lexus dealer for a fix, assuming the problem would be minor - perhaps just a loose connection somewhere behind the dashboard. Surprise! They concluded that the 5-year old factory-installed nav system needs complete replacement at a cost of $1740.”

One of the problems with expensive cars is, the repairs can also be pretty expensive.

Here is what's on consumer's minds today: Citibank, AT&T, Lexus, Beyond the grave, Not a cheap fix, credit card companies and expensive cars....

Article Image

Visa, MasterCard Settle Antitrust Suit

A federal judge today approved a settlement of antitrust charges against Visa and Mastercard that either will or won't increase competition among credit card issuers, depending on who you talk to.

U.S. District Judge Nicholas G. Garufis said he found the "public interest is best served by approving the proposed final judgement." But American Express, which is not a party to the settlement, said the settlement will allow Visa and Mastercard to "pay merchants to discriminate against American Express."

But American Express said the settlement will create less, not more, competition.

All three credit card issuers had been sued by the U.S. Justice Department and 18 states, claiming that the rules the issuers had in place prohibited retailers from steering customers to lower-cost payment options.

The rules also prohibited merchants from telling customers about the transaction fees charged to the merchant by the credit card companies.

Under the settlement, Visa and MasterCard are required to allow merchants to offer discounts to customers who pay with other credit cards that charge lower merchant fees as well as to customers that pay with cash or other alternative payment forms.

Comments submitted to the Court from trade groups, retailers associations and individual merchants were "overwhelmingly positive if not enthusiastic" in support of the settlement, Judge Garufis noted.

A federal judge today approved a settlement of antitrust charges against Visa and Mastercard that either will or won't increase competition among credit ca...

Article Image

What Are The Best Rewards Credit Cards?

While some consumers complain that they get no respect from their credit card company, credit card companies are doing everything they can to please another group of consumers – those who maintained great credit scores during the economic turmoil of the last two years.

Low interest rates don't always mean much to this group because, in most cases, they don't carry balances on their credit cards. They pay it off each month.

Instead, credit card companies compete with one another to offer the best and most enticing rewards programs, hoping to lure the most credit-worthy consumers with gifts, cash and airline miles. If you happen to fall into this group, you basically have your pick of rewards cards. But which one should you choose?

Card Hub, a site that analyzes credit cards, says the offers have gotten better and the rewards, well, more rewarding. The site has issued a list of what it says are among the best rewards credit cards:

  • Southwest Airlines Credit Card – Users get 50,000 bonus points (worth over $800 in Wanna Get Away Fares) after your first purchase. But it comes with a $99 annual fee.
  • Chase Sapphire Preferred Card – Get $625 worth of airfare or hotel accommodations, or $500 cash back when you spend $3,000 during the first three months. There is no annual fee for the first year, but you should expect to pay one after that.
  • Capital One Venture Rewards – Customers receive $250 in travel expenses when they spend $1,000 in the first three months and the annual fee is waved the first year.
  • New Ink Cash Business Card – Offers $250 cash back to business owners who spend $5,000 in the first three months. Perhaps the biggest reward, no annual fee.
  • Chase Freedom Visa – You can earn $200 cash back after spending $500 in the first three months and there is no annual fee.
  • British Airways Credit Card – Earn 50,000 miles, enough for a free transatlantic flight, if you spend $2,500 in the first 90 days. The card carries a $95 annual fee.

Annual fees

The downside to rewards credit cards is that most of them charge an annual fee. From the credit card company's perspective, if they are catering to customers who pay little or no interest because they don't carry a balance, and the company is handing out rewards, it needs to charge the fee if the account is going to be at all profitable.

If you're a consumer in this sought-after group, perhaps the question you have to ask yourself is, do you really need a rewards card at all? If you routinely put thousands of dollars in charges on your card each month, then the rewards you'll rack up might be worth an annual fee.

However, if you don't use your credit card all that much, a large credit line, flexible terms and no annual fee are probably more important than any enticing rewards.

Financial website CardHub.com has listed the best rewards credit cards...

Asking For Zip Code with Credit Card Purchase May Be Illegal

Retailers often ask customers making a credit card purchase to provide their zip code. The assumption is that the information is needed to confirm that the card is valid.

But there have been an increasing number of reports that businesses are using the customer's name and zip code to put together a much more complete portfolio, possibly including their mailing address, telephone number and email.

This practice may be illegal under certain circumstances. In California, the Song-Beverly Credit Card Act of 1971 makes it a crime to request and then record personal information from a customer paying with a credit card.

A Seattle law firm, Hagens Berman LLP, says it is investigating Nike, Inc. after reports that the company did just that.

Third-party vendors

The firm began its investigation after receiving reports that Nike customers were being asked for their zip codes upon making a purchase with a credit card at a Nike store. The firm believes that Nike may have then employed third-party vendors to use the first and last name of the customer and their zip code together to narrow down customers' home addresses.

The firm said it is interested in talking to consumers who made a purchase at a Nike store with a credit card and complied with a request for their zip code.

ConsumerAffairs.com would also like to hear from consumers who've had this experience. Please use the complaint form to do so.

Retailers often ask customers making a credit card purchase to provide their zip code. The assumption is that the information is needed to confirm that the...

Article Image

What's On Your Mind? Memory Lane, Cuisinart, Family Dollar, Citibank

Classmates.com has changed its name to Memory Lane, but it's still generating complaints from consumers who say they try to cancel during their “free trial” period, but somehow don't seem to be able to.

“Tried to cancel and it wouldn't take my password so I clicked on forgot password and it says I will get an e-mail with link to change password but they never send it,” Patricia, of Bronson, Kan. told ConsumerAffairs.com. “Now they have charged my account $39 because they wouldn't let me on to cancel plus the account wasn't due until July 12 and they already ran it through.”

Companies that have auto renewal, and that offer a free trial period before a monthly charge begins, should make it easier for consumers to get in touch with them, Of course, they might lose business that way.

Some things you shouldn't scrimp on

Aquilla, of Cottage Grove, Minn., writes in to say be careful what you stick in your ear, even if you think it's designed to go there.

“On July 8 my husband used the Family Dollar Q-tips that he purchased and the cotton ball popped off and it got stuck in his ear,” Aquilla said. “We were in disbelief! He even tried to see how simple it would be to pull one off and it came right off when he pulled the end of the cotton ball. He was up all night trying to get the cotton ball out of his ear;He could not get it out! He had horrible pain in his ear and could not bear the pain any longer and he eventually paid a visit to the Emergency Room.

Aquilla said doctors at the emergency room had to surgically remove the cotton ball. It might be fine to spend just a dollar for some items. Cotton swabs that go in your ear might not be one of them.

More hot coffee

Roger, of Elbert, Colo., is the latest reader to write in reporting a burning problem with his Cuisinart coffee maker.

“I too have purchased a Cuisinart DCC-1200 coffee maker,” Roger told ConsumerAffairs.com. “It worked great for the first nine months. Last night I brewed a pot of coffee and luckily was sitting in the living room where I could hear the coffee pot making very loud gurgling and popping noises. Went into kitchen to check out the unusual noises and found the coffee maker smoking from the bottom. Having read on this website the exact problem occurring repeatedly Cuisinart has a real problem and a huge potential liability.”

Given the reports like Roger, we would be surprised if the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) isn't already looking into this. Just to make sure they are, Roger and other with this problem need to make sure they send the CPSC the same reports they send us.

Banks will hike your rates any chance they get

The CARD Act, signed into law earlier this year, limited credit card companies in the kinds of actions they can take on consumers' accounts. But the law gives them latitude to raise your interest rate significantly if you are late with a payment.

“I was a customer of Citibank for 13 years without a late payment,” said Gail, of Muskego, Wisc. “I do all my bill paying online, and receive the bill on line as well. I never received the electronic bill in September. In October I realized that I hadn't received the bill and immediately made a payment. In January, they raised my rate to 25.99%! I called and spoken with multiple customer service reps and emailed off the website several times. They refused to budge off the increased rate.”

Gail said she closed her Citi account and is now a happy Chase credit card customer. But she, and other consumers, should keep in mind that banks will not pass up any opportunity to legally raise your interest rate now that the law has limited some of their other options.

Here is what's on consumer's minds today: Memory Lane, Cuisinart, Family Dollar, Citibank, Some things you shouldn't scrimp on and More hot coffee....

Article Image

Consumer Debt Rises For Eighth Straight Month

In the months immediately following the 2008 credit crisis, consumers for the most part drastically reduced their use of credit cards. Now, they're reaching again for their plastic.

The Federal Reserve reports consumer credit rose in May for an eighth straight month, mostly because of – you guessed it – credit card use.

According to the Fed's data, credit rose by $5.08 billion after a revised $5.67 billion gain in April. The increase was more than $1 higher than the consensus projection.

Buying necessities

It's not that consumers are using their credit cards to buy big screen TVs and go on expensive vacations. Since many consumers use their credit cards for gasoline purchases, and gasoline costs have risen in the last year, it stands to reason that gasoline is responsible for a part of the rise in consumer credit.

Other economists suggest that consumers are also turning to plastic to buy groceries and pay for other day-to-day needs. Revolving debt, which includes credit cards, rose by $3.37 in May after decreasing $877 million in April, according to the central bank’s data. It was the first gain this year and the biggest since June 2008.

 In addition to revolving debt like credit cards, non-revolving debt rose $1.71 billion in May after jumping $6.54 billion in April. Non-revolving debt includes things like auto financing and auto loans.

Other debt

Non-revolving debt is usually set up for a uniform, long-term payback period and as a rule, is less troublesome for consumers than credit card debt, which carries much higher interest rates and often, added fees.

To keep credit card debt under control, the Center for Responsible Lending says consumers should always pay more than the minimum amount due on the monthly bill.

Paying more than the minimum can save you as much as $2 for every extra $1 you pay, the group advises. For example, before the CARD Act, paying $100 extra could save you $164 in interest charges, but now that same payment amount can save you $224. 

The Federal Reserve says consumer credit rose in May...

Article Image

CitiGroup Presssed for More Answers on Data Breach

Connecticut Attorney General George Jepsen wants more information from Citigroup because he says the company’s disclosures about a recent data breach fail to explain how it occurred and what is being done to protect affected customers from potential financial fraud.

“As one of the largest lending institutions in the country, Citigroup must assiduously protect the personal information it collects from its customers and employ the highest levels of data security. I expect Citigroup to fully compensate and protect any Connecticut consumers harmed as a result of this breach,” Jepsen wrote in a letter Monday to the corporation’s chief executive officer and general counsel.

Citigroup said last week that account information – name, account number and contact information, including e-mail address -- of approximately 1 percent of its Citi North America bankcard customers was viewed as a result of “unauthorized access” to Citi’s Account Online.

Delayed warning

It turns out, however, that the attack occurred nearly a month before the bank got around to telling anyone about it.

“Unfortunately, critical facts about the intrusion remain unclear, including details concerning the number and characteristics of impacted accounts, the cause of the breach, the steps taken to notify and protect the affected individuals, and the nature of any procedures adopted to prevent future data breaches,” Jepsen said.

Citi says it took all appropriate measures.

“Citi immediately rectified the data breach upon discovery, while also placing internal fraud alerts and monitoring on all accounts at risk,” a spokesman said. “Simultaneously, we began analysis to determine the precise accounts and type of information accessed, which resulted in roughly 1 percent of North America Citi-branded credit cards. Within three weeks -- June 3 precisely -- we began sending notification letters to clients, the majority of which included re-issued credit cards.”

CitiGroup Presssed for More Answers on Data Breach Connecticut attorney general says company has "failed to explain" the incident...

Article Image

What's On Your Mind? Michaels, Verizon, Polaroid

The tampering with Michaels' debit card readers last month is still having reverberations. We heard this week from Kathryn, of Buckeye, Ariz., who said she and her husband made a big purchase at Michaels last month and used their debit card.

“We are devastated to hear about the fraud that has happened and do not feel safe buying anything from Michael's stores anymore, knowing we could be at risk of identity theft,” Kathryn told ConsumerAffairs.com

Actually, the safest time to use a debit card may be after a store has gone through the experience Michaels has. Security has likely been beefed up significantly. It's the stores that haven't had the experience you have to worry about. But it certainly does point up the need to be very careful where you use a debit card, especially if you tend to keep a lot of money in your account.

Danny got scammed

We've written about this scam several times but obviously people still haven't gotten the message. It's the guy who calls and says he is collecting on an unpaid payday loan, and threatens the victim with jail. In a new wrinkle, the caller is now a female and she says she is calling for SGQ Processing. Danny, of Cassleberry, Fla., got the call at work.

“I didn't know what else to do so I called my wife back and told her what she said. My wife in turn had to borrow the money in fear I was going to jail and Western Unioned the money to them,” Danny said.

Of course, the money is now gone and there is no way for Danny to get it back. If he had been thinking clearly, maybe Danny wouldn't have acted in such haste, but then again, he had reason to be afraid.

“I have never taken out a payday loan but they had all my information, including last address, Social Security Number and my old bank account number,”he said.

That shows this scammer is not picking victims at random. They have sensitive data about these consumers. The question is, where did they get it? We have recently learned that federal law enforcement agencies are actively investigating this dangerous and growing scam. We hope it's true.

 Small charges add up

It's always a good idea to carefully review every bill you receive each month, to make sure the charges are correct. This has become a monthly ritual for Ronald, of Green Cove Springs, Fla., when he receives his Verizon Wireless bill.

“I have been getting billed monthly for data usage from $.20 to $1.99. I do not use text or any form of data and I have called them to remove this from my bill and stop any more charges,” Ronald told ConsumerAffairs.com. “They will credit my bill when I call them and they will state that they have stopped anymore charges, but the next time I get a bill there is a new charge for megabyte usage like my new bill for $1.99. I feel that they are doing this on a lot of their customer's who are not catching it on their bills.”

It's worth noting that back in October, Verizon agreed to pay $90 million in refunds to consumers who were wrongly charged for accessing the Internet with their mobile phones. 

Smokin' TV

In recent weeks we've had an increase in reports from consumers that their Polaroid flat screen TV sets started smoking, and in some cases, actually caught fire.

“I have the same problem as a lot of others 32" set owners, said Shelia, of Middleburg, Fla. I heard sizzling and saw a puff of smoke come out of the TV. If anything happens with a law suit, I would love to know about it.

Funny Shelia should ask. A federal class action lawsuit filed this week claims that the sets have a known defect that Polaroid has failed to fix and that the company has failed to warn consumers that their TVs are a fire hazard. 

The suit claims that Polaroid knew as early as 2006 that its LCD TVs fail, smoke and catch fire, but actively concealed the defects. failed to warn customers before or after the sale, failed to recall the sets and failed to amend the warranties or reimburse customers for the cost of repairing or replacing the TVs.

Here is what's on consumer's minds today: Michaels, Verizon, Polaroid, Danny got scammed, Small charges add up and Smokin' TV....

Article Image

What's On Your Mind? New Millennium, AT&T, Cheap Tickets

In theory, a secured credit card should be ideal for a person with limited credit. The consumer deposits several hundred dollars into an account that is used to secure the credit line. The bank has no risk because the consumer is borrowing their own money. Unfortunately, these arrangements hardly ever work out to the consumer's benefit.

“I opened up a $300.00 New Millennium credit card with my own money, paid off the balance and contacted them to see when I would receive my initial deposit,” Genna, of Phoenix, Ariz., told ConsumerAffairs.com. “I was told that they had closed my account back in October on their own accord.”

Genna said she has no idea why New Millennium Bank closed her account or why she's not getting her $300 back. She should certainly demand some answers. Our guess is that along the way, the bank assessed a number of hefty fees that eventually added up to $300. That, in a nutshell, is the problem with most of these secured credit cards.

It's interesting to note that, according to USA Tolday, last year the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation forced New Millennium to suspend its credit card activities because of its consumer disclosure and compliance program. If Genna doesn't get satisfactory answers, we suggest she lodge a complaint with FDIC.

Slight disconnect

Jennifer, of Bishop, Calif., was a happy Alltel customer required to switch over to AT&T last year. She says she and her family were very unhappy with AT&T, especially since she asked for, but did not receive, a replacement phone for her daughter. So, she switched to Verizon Wireless.

“On December 24th, after making the switch, FedEx shows up at my door with my daughter's new phone from AT&T,” Jennifer said. “Mind you, I had left them and taken my numbers with me, so they knew I was gone. I returned that phone and all other equipment that belonged to them as I no longer needed it. I have now received a collections statement due to Alltel stating that I owe them $530, and three months of billing from AT&T.

We're assuming that Jennifer went through the process of canceling her AT&T account. If so, there should be a record. It's not enough, however, to simply open an account with another carrier and move numbers.

A year is actually 10 months

Travel sites don't allow many cancellations, but nearly all make an allowance for a medical emergency. Azalia, of New York, says just such an emergency prevented her from using airline tickets she purchased through CheapTickets.

“I provided two documents from two different doctors stating I was not able to fly,” Azalia told ConsumerAffairs.com. “I was told I could not receive a refund, however, I had a year to use the credit.”

Now, two months shy of what she thought was the deadline, she learns the credit is no longer valid. What happened?

“I was informed the credit deadline is based on the time of booking, not travel date.”

Azalia thinks the policy is unfair, and we agree that it seems a bit arbitrary. But it underscores the need to carefully read terms and conditions with things like this, especially with a company that has the word “cheap” in its name.

Disposable lawnmowers?

Lawnmowing season is in full swing, but D., of Walnut Grove, N.C., is watching his grass grow these days.

“My John Deere L120 has less than 300 hours on it and has been serviced regularly, D. said. “Every time I mow it throws off the drive belt. I first thought it was the PTO so I quit going in reverse at all...now it ONLY goes in reverse.”

D. took the mower to a repair shop and was told it was leaking transmission fluid. Not an easy fix, as it turns out.

“James River Equipment, where I purchased the mower, informed me today the transmission is a 'sealed, non-repairable' part costing $750, not including labor,” he said.

D. says he can't justify spending that on a repair and will simply buy a new one. He's not alone in experiencing these kinds of problems.

Here is what's on consumer's minds today: New Millennium, AT&T, Cheap Tickets, Slight disconnect and A year is actually 10 months....

Article Image

Financial Site Lists 'Worst Credit Cards On The Market'

The credit card marketplace is constantly changing, especially in the wake of Congress's recent credit card reform legislation, that has forced lenders to be more creative to make up lost revenue.

This can be a problem for many consumers, who admit to having little financial knowledge to begin with. The National Foundation for Credit Counseling’s 2011 Financial Literacy Survey found that 69 percent of U.S. consumers who use credit cards fail to keep all the credit card offers straight. Forty-one percent of consumers gave their personal finance knowledge a grade of C or worse.

In an effort to offer some guidance, the financial website CardHub.com has published a list of what it calls “the worst credit cards on the market.” The cards on the list were singled out for their high annual fees and interest rates. Some were described as having no redeeming qualities whatsoever.

According to CardHub.com, consumers should avoid these credit cards:

The Visa Black Card

This product has a $495 annual fee and a 14.99% APR, and the only benefits it provides are 1% cash back on all purchases, airport lounge access, and the vague promise of “luxury gifts.” Needless to say, says CardHub.com, it doesn’t even compare to the famous American Express “black card.”

The Wells Fargo Business Platinum Credit Card

This is unquestionably the worst business credit card on the market, according to the site. Not only does it come from one of the least transparent business credit card issuers, but it also has an interest rate between 9.24% and 18.24% and does not provide rewards or protect users from arbitrary interest rate increases.

The First PREMIER Bank Credit Card

This partially-secured credit card requires that you place a $95 security deposit to get a $300 credit line, and has a 49.9% APR, a $75 first-year annual fee, and $120 in membership fees each year thereafter.

Over the years, ConsumerAffairs.com has received hundreds of complaints about this particular card. Most recently, consumers have complained the company makes it impossible to make payments.

“First Premier Bank stopped sending me statements, cut off my online services, and effectively made it impossible to pay on 2 accounts,” Roxanne, of Apache Junction, Ariz., told ConsumerAffairs.com. “For two years, I have tried to contact this credit card company to get a statement, get online services back or the name of a collection company to clear this debt. All this while, the amount of the debt is rising.”

Barclaycard Visa

This card is simply mediocre across the board, says CardHub.  While it doesn’t have an annual fee, it also doesn’t offer any rewards or a traditional introductory interest rate.  Instead, it has a 22.99% regular APR and a curious deferred-interest feature, which gives you a chance to get no interest for 6-12 months on your first Apple purchase.  If you miss a payment or fail to pay down your balance in full before the introductory period concludes, however, interest is retroactively applied from the time of purchase.

How do you find a good credit card? According to the U.S. Federal Reserve, make sure you read and fully understand the credit card offer before applying. Understand the terms and what fees apply.

Shop around. Don't just take the first offer that comes in the mail. Also, be leery of credit cards that offer triple miles and other extravagant rewards. They have to pay for those perks somehow.

CardHub.com has listed what it calls the worst credit cards on the market....

Article Image

Court Certifies Class Action Case Against Chase

A federal judge has certified a class-action lawsuit against Chase Bank that alleges the company promised consumers permanent low interest rates on "check loans" and later forced them to make increased minimum payments or accept higher interest rates.  

U.S. District Court Judge Maxine M. Chesney certified the class and denied a motion by Chase to strike the complaint.

The plaintiffs in the case, which was filed in 2009, allege that they each had a Chase credit card that carried a minimum monthly payment of 2% of the outstanding balance, and that the card included a “credit card check” option which provided a loan with a fixed annual percentage rate (APR) until the balance is paid in full.

In November 2008, Chase advised some of the plaintiffs that it was raising the minimum monthly payment from 2% to 5% of the balance on their account. Others were not notified until June 2009.

The plaintiffs charge that Chase's intent was to forced the class members to accept higher APR loans or make a late payment a trigger a “penalty APR” as high as 29.99%.

The suit charges that Chase breached the “implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing implicit in the Cardmember Agreement.”

Chase had argued that the case should not be granted class action status because of differences in the form letters various plaintiffs received. But Judge Chesney disagreed and said the plaintiffs' situations were “materially similar.”

The court's finding defines the class as all persons who entered into a loan agreement with Chase, whereby Chase promised a fixed APR until the loan balance was paid in full and (I) whose minimum monthly payment was increased by Chase to 5% of the outstanding balance or (ii) who were notified by Chase of a minimum payment increase and subsequently closed their account or agreed to an alternative change in terms.

Court Certifies Class Action Case Against Chase. Bank promised permanent low interest rates, then increased minimum payment...

Article Image

Credit CARD Act Doing Its Job, Study Finds

There's been a lot of bad press lately about new bank charges and fees that are supposedly the result of new rules that limit how much banks can charge to process debit card transactions. But while the debit card rules may have some unintended consequences, the Credit CARD Act of 2009 is doing what it was supposed to do, a new study finds.

Credit card holders are seeing stabilized interest rates, the elimination of overlimit penalty charges, a reduction in late fees charged by banks and minimal changes in annual fees since the Credit CARD Act of 2009 took effect, according to new research by the Pew Health Group’s Safe Credit Cards Project.

Pew data show that the median advertised interest rates for purchases on bank credit cards remained unchanged from 2010. Meanwhile, bank cash advance and penalty rates held firm. Additionally, the percentage of cards with annual fees held steady for credit unions, at 14 percent, and increased for banks, from 14 percent in 2010 to 21 percent in 2011. The amount charged for annual fees remained unchanged.

“Pew’s research shows that predictions that the legislation would spark new charges and long-term interest rate growth have not materialized,” said Nick Bourke, director of Pew’s Safe Credit Cards Project. “Whatever increases in advertised interest rates we saw going into 2010 have not continued into 2011. The Act created a new equilibrium where interest rates have flattened, penalty charges have declined and a number of practices deemed ‘unfair or deceptive’ have disappeared. Consumers are enjoying safer, more transparently priced credit cards – and banks and credit unions are able to compete on a more level playing field.”

The study, “A New Equilibrium: After Passage of Landmark Credit Card Reform, Interest Rates and Fees Have Stabilized,” is the latest in a series of reports from the Pew Safe Credit Cards Project that has examined all consumer credit cards offered online by the nation’s 12 largest bank and 12 largest credit union issuers. Together, these institutions control more than 90 percent of the nation’s outstanding credit card debt. For this latest report, which measures how the industry has changed since the passage of the Credit CARD Act, Pew collected data in March 2010 and January 2011. 

Credit CARD Act Doing Its Job, Study FindsInterest rates and fees are stable, overlimit charges eliminated...

Article Image

Prepaid Cards Can Deal Unemployed Workers a Losing Hand

A report finds that many of the 13 million Americans who are unemployed are getting stung with unnecessary and poorly disclosed fees in the 40 states that use prepaid cards for unemployment compensation.

At the same time, the best cards may benefit “unbanked” consumers – those who don't have banking accounts -- and save states money, according to the survey conducted by the National Consumer Law Center.

Prepaid cards can help states eliminate the costs of paper checks and help unbanked workers avoid check cashing fees and the risks of carrying cash,” said Lauren Saunders, managing attorney of the center and the primary author of the report. “Yet prepaid card junk fees stack the deck against jobless Americans who need every dollar during a financially stressful time.”

The center's report analyzes the payment options, fees, and access to account information available to workers in every state that uses the prepaid cards. It also surveys the laws that do (or do not) protect workers and offers recommendations for how states can design a card that works well for both the state and its unemployed workers.

The report singles out as especially problematic the $10 to $20 overdraft fees that U.S. Bank has on prepaid cards in five states: Arkansas, Idaho, Nebraska, Ohio, and Oregon. No other bank’s prepaid card charges overdraft fees, which the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) has found are “inconsistent with federal law.”

The Tennessee card (issued by JP Morgan Chase) draws the two of clubs for the card with the most junk fees, including ATM, PIN debit, denied transaction, and balance inquiry fees.

Winning hand

So who holds the winning hand? California and New Jersey currently have the best cards (both issued by Bank of America), although both could benefit from fees more clearly and prominently displayed on websites. The State of California loses one trick for not offering direct deposit.

The report urges the new U.S. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, which starts work in July, and DOL to work together to ban overdraft fees and other unfair fees and to improve transparency and competition by posting all fee schedules in one place so that states and consumers can compare who has the best hand.

The report cautions states not to see prepaid cards as a payment panacea. Workers with bank accounts should first be offered the choice of direct deposit, but they do not have that option in six states: California, Indiana, Kansas, Maryland, Nevada and Wyoming.

This report adds to the body of research that National Consumer Law Center has done on banking and payment systems, including prepaid debit cards.

It took months of research to obtain this information, so now that we’ve laid the cards on the table, it should help states to cut a better prepaid card deal,” said Saunders. “This issue also reinforces the need for the new Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, which will help safeguard consumers from unfair fees on prepaid cards, credit cards and other financial products.”

Prepaid Cards Can Deal Unemployed Workers a Losing HandReport reviews 40 states’ unemployment compensation prepaid cards...

Article Image

Study: CARD Act Making A Positive Difference

When Congress passed the CARD Act two years ago, to curb some of the worst credit card industry abuses, there were plenty of skeptics who said the measure would backfire, creating other problems for consumers.

But new research by the Pew Health Group's Safe Credit Cards Project says that hasn't happened. In a study, the group says the CARD Act appears to be doing its job. Credit card holders are seeing stabilized interest rates, the elimination of over-limit penalty charges, a reduction in late fees charged by banks and minimal changes in annual fees since the Credit CARD Act of 2009 took effect.

Stability

For example, the data shows that median advertised interest rates for purchases on bank credit cards remained the same as in 2010. Bank cash advance and penalty rates held firm.

The percentage of cards with annual fees held steady for credit unions, at 14 percent, and increased for banks, from 14 percent in 2010 to 21 percent in 2011. The amount charged for annual fees remained unchanged.

One of the biggest changes stops credit card companies from raising the interest rates on existing balances. When a lender increases the rate now, it only applies to new purchases. In the past, consumers with large balances found their payments rose sharply when lenders significantly raised the interest rate on their account, which at the time applied to existing balances.

"Pew's research shows that predictions that the legislation would spark new charges and long-term interest rate growth have not materialized," said Nick Bourke, director of Pew's Safe Credit Cards Project. "Whatever increases in advertised interest rates we saw going into 2010 have not continued into 2011.”

Positive changes

Bourke says the legislation has created what he calls “a new equilibrium” where interest rates have flattened, penalty charges have declined and a number of practices considered unfair or deceptive have disappeared.

“Consumers are enjoying safer, more transparently priced credit cards - and banks and credit unions are able to compete on a more level playing field," Bourke said.

The Credit CARD Act, signed on May 22, 2009, is a comprehensive law that aims to protect consumers by restricting when interest rates can be raised on existing balances and banning "unfair or deceptive" practices. It also allowed new rules to be created to ensure that late charges and other penalties charged by issuers are "reasonable and proportional." The bill passed with bipartisan support by both the House of Representatives and the Senate.

"The Credit Card Act is an excellent example of how bipartisan legislation can be enacted that both protects consumers from potentially harmful practices while simultaneously creating a marketplace where banks and credit unions are able to compete based on clear and predictable pricing," said Eleni Constantine, director of the Financial Security Portfolio at the Pew Health Group. "Congress should take a similar approach to make other financial products, such as checking accounts and short-term, small-dollar loans, safer and more transparent."

A Pew study says the CARD Act has made positive changes in the credit card environment...

Article Image

When Did Debt Become The American Way?

American consumers increased their borrowing for a sixth straight month in March, according to the Federal Reserve. The Fed notes borrowing increased for car loans, as well as credit card purchases.

This, of course, was almost universally greeted as good news. But not too long ago, it might not have. Taking on significant debt has become "normal"—and even patriotic—to some consumers, according to a new study in the Journal of Consumer Research.

"How did America, a country once so indelibly marked with Puritan principles of self-discipline and thrift, become a nation so awash in personal debt?" ask authors Lisa Peñaloza and Michelle Barnhart.

Normal

The researchers interviewed 27 white, middle-class Americans before the 2008 financial crisis and found that even though consumers believe that they should limit their debt, they take on debt because doing so has become normal.

"As one participant put it, taking on debt is 'the American way,'" the authors write.

For many participants, the disconnect between what consumers say they should do and what they actually do begins in young adulthood.

"When their parents did talk about credit and debt, it was to counsel them to use credit only in emergencies," the authors write. "In contrast, these study participants viewed debt as acceptable and necessary for middle class Americans who 'have to' buy a house, furnishings, a college education, and a car—items most cannot afford without credit."

Participants recognized the value of a good credit history and understood that they needed to use credit to build one.

Punished for living within her means

"The only one who had avoided credit in an attempt to live within her means found it impossible to be a 'normal consumer' without it, recalling that she had been denied a cell phone and had difficulty when traveling because she did not have a credit card," the authors write.

Although consumers generally tried to use credit responsibly, some participants "gamed" credit by taking out multiple cards, rolling over balances, and amassing large debts.

"So long as these consumers consistently paid at least the minimum amount required, financial agents rewarded them with higher credit limits and even mortgages," the authors write.

In recent decades, economic growth has been based in large part on credit. If consumers can spend more than they earn, they are able to increase consumption, thereby creating more wealth. That's the theory, at least.

In the fall of 2008, when the collapse of Lehman Brothers triggered a credit crisis, consumers found it much harder to get credit. Not surprisingly, the economy began to contract into the Great Recession.

"Spurred on by tax rebates, prominent among which is the mortgage tax deduction, ambition to get ahead, and social pressure to build wealth, study participants accumulated debt to demonstrate financial independence and express freedom, and some participants even cast their credit use as a patriotic duty to boost the national economy," the authors conclude.

Consumers are increasing their use of credit again, but why is that a good thing?...

What's On Your Mind? Gift Cards, DIRECTV, Hotels.com

Francis, of Plainview, N.Y., recently discovered one of the downsides to using a gift card to buy gasoline. She just got an American Express $100 gift card for Mother's Day and immediately purchased $25 worth of gasoline at a Hess station. When she tried to use the card again the following day, she was in for a surprise.

“I was so embarrassed in the store as they told me the card was declined,” Francis told ConsumerAffairs.com. “I will not be able to use this card according to Am Ex for two or three days until they get the clear from the station.”

Even though there was $75 left on the gift card, the gas station placed a freeze on the entire amount. Some bars and restaurants – places where “pre-authorized” debit purchases are accepted – do it too.

The reason is simple. It can take two or three days for the transaction to clear. The gas station wants to make sure there is still money left on the card when the transaction goes through. It's something to keep in mind when you are shopping with a gift card.

Direct contradiction

When you subscribe to any service, the provider has to be able to deliver it to you, or you shouldn't be bound by the agreement, right? Eric of Mount Pleasant, S.C., cancelled his DIRECTV service when he moved to a new apartment and DIRECTV coiuldn't get a direct line of sight to establish service.

“They said they'd let us out of our fees because it was not our fault,” Eric said. “They then hit our checking account for a full months service and billed us for $300 more for early cancellation.”

Eric is trying to work things out with DIRECTV but still hasn't been reimbursed.

Mistaken identity

It's one thing when you know you are booking travel through a travel site like Hotels.com, but often, when you are searching for the name of a particular hotel or location, you can be on a travel site's web page while you think you are on the hotel's site.

“I called and spoke to a person who did not identify himself as a Hotels.com representative, so I proceeded with my reservation thinking I was speaking with someone at the Mariott,” V., of Philadelphia, told ConsumerAffairs.com. “ I booked a room for one night May 7th. After they got my credit card info he mumbled some disclosures and wished me a nice evening. To my understanding he said to call the day before if I wished to cancel my room, no specific time was mentioned. Our plans fell through and we decided to stay home that weekend so I call at 7:20PM on the 6th and was told that I will be charged the full fee!”

V. doesn't really have much of an argument, since she booked the site through Hotel.com and has to abide by their rules.

“I work very hard and long hours, don't have time to fool around online,” V. said. “I trusted people to take care of me on the phone with clarity.”

Sorry, V., but in the Internet age careful attention to detail is a requirement, and sometimes old fashioned trust is misplaced.

No shield against inconvenience

Many people purchase home warranties, or service contracts, thinking it protects them in the event of a major system failure. But getting satisfactory service when something goes wrong isn't always easy.

“We contacted American Home Shield regarding our residence hot water heater that was not working,” said Michael, of Phoenix, Ariz.

AHS sent its contract plumber out the next day and relit the burner on the water heater that Michael says had been working fine for six years. But the pilot would not stay lit, and Michael found the service company less and less responsive.

“I would think that with all the 24-hour plumbing service companies in Phoenix that AHS could have someone available for us,” Michael said.

True, but that's not how these service contracts work. The warranty company strikes the best deal possible with a local contractor, who may be paid less than the normal rate for the service call. At any rate, they are likely to be less enthusiastic about your emergency than a contractor that you hire directly. It's something to keep in mind when someone tries to sell you a service contract.

Here is what's on consumer's minds today: Gift Cards, DIRECTV, Hotels.com, Direct contradiction, Mistaken identity and No shield against inconvenience....

Why Do Credit Card Companies Lower Your Credit Limit?

When you receive a credit card, you are given a limit on the balance you can put on that account. The difference between the limit and your actual balance plays a role in your credit score.

The credit reporting agencies like to see a low balance to limit ratio. So do the credit card companies. If you have a limit of $5,000 and a balance of $4,000, it makes them nervous, even though they are earning interest on what you owe.

"I have a Gap Visa account with GE Money Bank that I have been making consistent payments to since I opened this account," Tanya, of Brooklyn, N.Y., told ConsumerAffairs.com.

Balance reduced by more than half

Hoping to buy a home, Tanya said she made a $1,000 payment on her balance last month, which cut her balance by more than half. Normally, this kind of payment looks good to credit agencies and credit card companies. In Tanya's case, it apparently didn't.

"GE Money lowered my available credit to $700 for no good reason," Tanya said. "Now on my credit report it appears as if my available credit is maxed out which affects my credit score."

A couple of years ago, in the wake of the credit meltdown, there were wholesale reductions in credit card limits. The reason was simple. The credit card companies were worried that many of their creditors would not be able to pay off their balances. Even consumers with high credit scores were not immune.

Possible reasons

As Tanya's experience shows, credit card companies are still reducing credit limits, and they could be doing it for many reasons. For one, they may have more cash needs right now, and don't want as much credit on their books.

They could also be looking at customers like Tanya, who have been carrying a balance of more than half their credit limit. Though it wasn't intended as punishment, when she took the positive step of making a big payment against her balance, the credit card company lowered her limit, meaning she won't be able to use that credit in the future.

It also has the unfair effect of making it appear that she has used all but $28 of her credit limit, making her look risky to future creditors. Even though she had taken a step to pay down her balance, Tanya feels as though she is being treated as if she doesn't pay her bills on time and has a poor credit history. She says if she had known what was going to happen, she would have hung on to her $1,000.

To the bank, it's probably a simple business decision. Banks and credit reporting agencies prefer that consumers don't use more than 30 percent of their available credit and when Tanya gave them the opportunity to reduce her limit, by making a big payment, they did.

Tanya, meanwhile, feels like the rules have been changed. As a result, she may now be less likely to buy a home.

Trying to pay down your credit card balance can result in your credit limit being reduced....

Suit Charges Capital One Used Robo-Signing to Collect Debts

Have robo signers invaded the credit card collections arena?

A federal class action claims Capital One Bank and the Goldman & Warshaw law firm use "false information and documentation" in credit-card collections.

In the suit, Charles Fratz of Warrington, Pa., charges that Capital One and its attorneys cited documents and contracts that did not apply to the case at hand.

For example, in a collections letter to Fratz, Capital One referred to a credit application supposedly signed by Fratz in November 2002. But a closer look at the application finds a copyright notice dated 2005 at the bottom.

The attached Agreement significantly post-dates the dates that the credit card was allegedly issued and could not have been the operative Agreement,” the suit charges, alleging that the apparently random substitution of documents violates the Federal Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA).

Fratz' suit cites previous, similar lawsuits against Capital One as evidence the bank was aware that it was using false documentation.

The suit seeks class action status on behalf of all consumers who have been the subject of collection lawsuits brought by the bank and its attorneys. It asks for compensation for consumers' legal costs, punitive damages and interest.

Suit Charges Capital One Used Robo-Signing to Collect Debts The bank and its lawyers cited non-existent and incorrect documents, suit charges...

Wells Fargo Testing Micro-Chip Credit Card

For years, Europeans have used credit cards embedded with a tiny microchip. Now, these electronic cards are coming to the U.S. Wells Fargo said it is testing the "chip" cards with frequent travelers, especially those who travel abroad.

The bank said it decided to try to new cards after receiving complaints from customers who reported difficulty using their standard credit cards overseas.

"U.S. issuers and merchants rely primarily on magnetic stripe technology," said Eric Schindewolf, vice president of product development for Wells Fargo Consumer Credit Card. "However, many parts of the world have adopted chip-enabled payment cards as a primary means of authentication, which has been problematic for customers who travel abroad and were unable to use their credit card. By combining traditional magnetic stripe along with the EMV chip technology, we hope our customers will have the convenience to use their credit card no matter where they are in the world."

Last to adopt

In fact, the U.S. is among the last of the developed countries that still relies on the magnetic strip on the back of credit cards to transmit information. Countries that have adopted the chip technology say it is much more secure, resulting in fewer unauthorized transactions.

Wells Fargo is partnering with Visa for the pilot project, whose product is called the Visa Smart Card. It will include both the traditional magnetic strip, as well as the chip. Wells Fargo scanned its database of customers and selected about 15,000 who frequently travel out of the country. They will be offered the Visa Smart Card, which should be available by mid-year, the bank said.

"This initiative will enable Wells Fargo customers to have their Visa card payments accepted anywhere in the world," said Beth Robertson, Director of Payments Research at Javelin Strategy & Research. "EMV technology is important to creating the widespread global acceptance that cardholders expect."

Wells Fargo has become the first U.S. bank to offer a credit card with an embedded microchip....

Article Image

Wells Fargo Ponies Up, Joins No-Debit-Card-Perks Posse

Wells Fargo has joined the no-debit-card-perks posse. The San Francisco bank says it will stop offering debit card reward programs to new customers, and says no decision has been made about current customers.

Chase did the same a few weeks ago, as did US Bank and PNC.

The banks are blaming the decision on the Dodd-Frank financial services overhaul that limits the transaction fees banks can charge merchants for processing debit-card sales.

"Government price controls … make no sense. They distort our market-based, free-enterprise economy," Wells Fargo Chief Executive John Stumpf said in his annual shareholder letter posted on the bank's website earlier this month.

“What’s next?” Stumpf wrote. “Will the government require car dealers to sell a new vehicle for $5,000 or grocers a gallon of milk for 50 cents?

The Federal Reserve has drafted a proposed rule to implement the restriction. It would cap the interchange fee at 12 cents, a 75 percent drop from its current level.

The proposal followed years of complaints by merchants and consumer advocates who said the fees amounted to a hidden tax on consumers but there have been second thoughts about the measure from, among others, the Consumer Federation of America.

The CFA, while saying it “strongly endorses the intent of the statute,” echoes some of the objections being raised by banks.

”[The rule's] implementation could have a very significant impact on consumers who use debit cards or participate in the banking system, as well as the many who do not,” said Travis Plunkett, the CFA's legislative director.

Banks have also found allies in Congress, where they traditionally find about as many friends as they need. Sen. Jon Tester (D-Mont.) has introduced a bill that would suspend implementation of the fee pending a two-year study.

Tester said he and his bipartisan group of supporters aren't doing this as a favor to banks. He said he's afraid the measure will wind up hurting consumers, as banks pile fees on top of frees to make up for the fees they lose from debit cards.

Wells Fargo Ponies Up, Joins No-Debit-Card-Perks Posse. Banks are circling the wagons, determined to fight off fee foes....

Article Image

What's On Your Mind? CitiBank, Comcast, Lowes

Taking a cash advance on your credit card is almost always expensive. First, you're charged a percentage of the total draw. Then, you usually pay a high interest rate on the balance.

"CitiBank is continuing to charge me interest for cash advances from November, 2007, Leonard, of Daly City, Calif., told ConsumerAffairs.com. "With all the payments that I have made since then, the cash advance portion should have been paid at this point."

You would think so, but it doesn't always work like that. If Leonard already had a balance on his card, or a balance transfer, he could be paying on up to three credit lines with one monthly payment. Until about a year ago, when the CARD Act went into effect, credit card companies applied the payment to the lowest interest balance first. So until February 2010, it's possible none of Leonard's monthly payment went to pay down his cash advance balance.

The law now says "when consumers have accounts that carry different interest rates for different types of purchases (i.e., cash advances, regular purchases, balance transfers or ATM withdrawals), payments in excess of the minimum amount due must go to balances with higher interest rates first."

A phone call would have been nice

Comedians often like to joke about waiting for the "cable guy" to show up, but to Michael, of Chicago, it's no laughing matter.

"I have absolutely had it with Comcast," Michael told ConsumerAffairs.com. "Most recently I had an appointment to have them fix an issue I reported earlier in the week. The operator I spoke with stated that there were no outages in my area and they had to send out a tech. So I stayed home all day Saturday, canceling plans, to wait. No one shows and when I call they tell me that there was an outage in the area and as such they cancel their appointments when they fix an outage."

Michael would like a phone call when the cable company cancels an appointment. It's probably not too much to ask.

Just take your chances

With all the complaints about appliances, who can blame consumers for opting for the extended warranty, or service contract. Often, however, it doesn't help.

I purchased a new Frigidaire dishwasher from Lowes, in August 2008," Melba, of San Marcos, Calif., told ConsumerAffairs.com. "I also purchased the four year extended warranty. Around the beginning of March 2011 I noticed that our dishwasher was making very loud motor sounds. It sounded like a helicopter preparing for lift off."

When Melba called Lowes for a repair she was referred to the company that serviced the contract. She said a repairman came, looked it over and advised her "not to use the dishwasher any more."

"What this repairman should have said to me was, 'don't run your dishwasher because I have done something horrible to it, Melba said.'" "Now your dishwasher will flood if you run it and it is going to leak all over the place."

Melba said she called the warranty company to get help but didn't get a call back. A few days later she said she received an Interpersonal Message Code from the company saying the warranty was invalid because of calcium build-up.

Frankly, it's almost always something like that. Melba would probably have been better off saving the money she spent on the extended warranty and using it to have her dishwasher repaired.

Here is what's on consumer's minds today: CitiBank, Comcast, Lowes, A phone call would have been nice and Just take your chances....

Article Image

GAO: Consumer Credit Protection Products Need Oversight

The Government Accountability Office (GAO) has a suggestion for the new Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection (CFPB): set some rules to help consumers deal with debt protection and credit insurance products.

The GAO said after a study that, although there are few consumer complaints about the products, they nevertheless carry a substantial cost and can be difficult for consumers to understand.

Fees can be substantial, with the annual cost often exceeding 10 percent of the cardholder's average monthly balance,” the GAO's report said. “In the aggregate, cardholders received 21 cents in tangible financial benefits for every dollar spent in debt protection product fees among the nine largest issuers in 2009.”

U.S. consumers paid about $2.4 billion on 24 million accounts for debt protection products in 2009, according to data from the nine largest credit card issuers.

Debt protection and credit insurance essential provide they same service – they cancel or suspend part or all of a credit card debt if the consumer dies, becomes disabled or becomes unemployed.

Debt protection is a banking product and is sold to consumers when they call their banks' customer service line, by direct mail, email and telemarketing and with new credit card applications. Credit insurance is an insurance product.

Debt protection products have largely displaced credit insurance in the credit card market, not necessarily a good development for consumers.

While credit insurance is regulated by state insurance commissions that, at least in some states, take a rather aggressive stance on cost versus benefits, debt protection is regulated by federal banking regulators, who focus on compliance with disclosure requirements and prohibitions of unfair or deceptive acts or practices.

However, GAO noted, the new Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection will soon assume supervisory and enforcement authority for financial products, including credit card debt protection products.

Ensuring that these products represent a fair value to consumers would be consistent with the new agency's mission,” the GAO said.

In particular, GAO suggested the CFPB study the financial benefits and costs to the consumer and improve consumer education efforts about the products.

GAO: Consumer Credit Protection Products Need Oversight. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau will take a closer look...

Consumerinfo.com's 'Credit Scores' are Misrepresented, Suit Charges

A federal class action claims Consumerinfo.com defrauds customers by misrepresenting its in-house method of calculating credit scores. 

The complaint, filed in federal court in San Diego charges that the site does not tell consumers that the credit score it sells is based on a proprietary, in-house method of calculation – Experian's Plus Score – that is not sold to lenders and not used by lenders to determine consumers' creditworthiness.

The suit charges that the credit scores are sold through Consumerinfo.com's network of websites, including www.freecreditreport.com, www.freecreditscore.com and www.consumerinfo.com.

The named plaintiff in the suit, David Waring of San Diego, said he purchased a credit score from Consumerinfo.com after visiting www.freecreditreport.com, enrolling in a monthly credit monitoring service for $14.95 per month, thinking he was buying information that give him guidance on how creditors viewed his creditworthiness.

Waring said Consumerinfo.com “failed to disclose clearly and conspicuously” that its credit score is not used by lenders.

20 million reports

Consumerinfo.com, based in Costa Mesa, Calif., claims to have delivered more than 20 million credit reports through its Internet sites. It is owned by Experian plc, whose corporate headquarters are in Dublin, Ireland.

The suit alleges that more than 90 percent of lenders use credit scores developed by Fair Isaac Corp., known as FICO scores.

Historically, Experian and the other two major U.S. credit bureaus – Equifax and TransUnion – have distributed FICO credit scores to lenders, under a licensing agreement with Fair Isaac. But in February 2009, Experian ended its relationship with FICO and no longer sells FICO-based scores to consumers, the suit charged.

“The 'credit scores' advertised by Defendant and provided to consumers are not credit scores sold to or used by lenders in determining consumers' creditworthiness and are not FICO scores … and [are] not therefore used by lenders in determining a consumer's creditworthiness,” the complaint charges.

Automatic enrollment

Consumers who place an order for their credit report and credit score are automatically enrolled in Consumerinfo.com's “Triple Advantage” credit reporting monitoring service, the suit alleges, results in a monthly charge of $14.95 or, in some instances, $19.95.

Experian plc had total revenue of $3.9 billion in 2010, according to its annual report, and cites its “interactive” business unit as contributing 27 percent of that revenue.

Previous challenges

It's not the first time Consumerinfo.com's claims have been challenged. In August 2005, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) reached a settlement in a case in which it charged the company had engaged in unfair and deceptive trade practices by failing to adequately disclose that consumers would be charged $79.95 if they did not cancel their credit report monitoring service within a trial period.

The company paid $950,000 in refunds to consumers as part of the settlement.

In January 2007, the FTC filed for an injunction, charged that Consumerinfo.com was violating the terms of the earlier settlement. The company was required to pay $300,000 in ill-gotten gains and enjoined from further violations.

The suit seeks damanges for all persons in the United States who purchased a credit score from Consumerinfo.com after March 22, 2007.

Consumerinfo.com's 'Credit Scores' are Misrepresented, Suit Charges...

Article Image

Chase Snips Debit Card Perks, Blames Feds

Expecting JPMorgan Chase to reward you for using your debit card? Think again. Chase is the latest bank to trim debit card benefits, blaming it on new federal rules that would cap so-called “interchange” fees, the fees banks charge retailers for processing debit card transactions.

Chase is mailing letters to its customers informing them that as of July 19, the rewards will be history. Customers will still be able to redeem rewards but will not earn new ones. PNC Bank and US Bank have also rolled back some of their debit card benefits.

Chase debit card users with co-branded cards have been accumulating airline miles on Continental and United. They've also been enjoining a waiver of the $25 fee for the first checked bag. That perk goes away April , according to Continental.

The only consolation is that Chase will stop charging the $25 annual fee consumers have been paying for the cards and the $65 annual fee charged to business travelers.

The Federal Reserve's proposed rule would cap the interchange fee at 12 cents, a 75 percent drop from its current level. The proposal followed years of complaints by merchants and consumer advocates who said the fees amounted to a hidden tax on consumers.

What options do Chase customers have? Not many. Changing debit cards isn't as easy as changing credit cards, since the debit card is tried to the consumer's checking account.

You'd have to open a new checking account at a different bank, one that offers perks on its debit cards – and then you'd have to hope that bank didn't follow Chase and the others that have already sliced debit card benefits.

While Chase is the largest bank to trim debit card benefits, it's most likely not the last. Bank of America, Wells Fargo and other large banks have not announced any plans but may do so when the Fed releases its final proposal next month.

Chase is mailing letters to its customers informing them that as of July 19, the rewards will be history. Customers will still be able to redeem rewards bu...

Article Image

What's On Your Mind? Unauthorized Charges, Toothpaste Allergy, Identity Theft

Elizabeth of Mountain View, Hi., says she unwittingly signed up for Trilegiant “ID Secure” service.

“Trilegiant mailed a solicitation to me in the form of a small check of about $10 - $15,” Elizabeth told ConsumerAffairs.com. “I mistakenly thought it was a rebate on a transaction I had had with Priceline.com.”

So she cashed it. The result was two charges, one for $139.99 and one for $149.99, on her credit card. Negative option marketers have long used the small check gambit as a means to get people to sign up for their services. States have cracked down on this practice in recent years.

Elizabeth sent us a copy a letter she wrote to the company demanding that these charges be reversed. She sited two settlements in which Trilegiant made amends with consumers in a number of states. We also suggest she send a copy of the letter to her state attorney general.

More mystery charges

When you get a brand new credit card, there shouldn’t be any charges on it. But even before Darryl of Chino Hills Calif., got her Sears credit card, there was a charge placed by DealMax.com.

“First I have never dealt with this website, second I had not even received my new card yet and this company already was charging me something I never authorized,” Darryl told ConsumerAffairs.com. 

DealMax is part of Adaptive Marketing, which in turn is a subsidiary of Vertrue, which has a long history of complaints about surprise charges on consumer’s credit card. Darrryl says she is fortunate her credit card providers was able to deny the charge. But the mystery remains as to how it got there in the first place.

No cavities, but…

In recent months we’ve gotten complaints from consumers who say they feel a burning sensation in their mouth after using Crest toothpaste. April, of Headland, Ala., is one of them.

“After about just a few uses, I began having gum pain,” April told ConsumerAffairs.com.

April said she didn’t think much about it, then it started worsening and her gums started swelling.

“I woke up just this morning planning to see a dentist for it and noticed the left side of my face from the temple down to my lips were horribly swollen and numb as if I'd been given Novocaine at the dentists office and the skin on the inside of my cheek was peeling off in big pieces,” she said.

April said the dentist asked if she changed toothpaste recently and, when she said she did, told her to switch back, saying she was having an allergic reaction.

Flavorings used in toothpaste have been known to trigger an allergic reaction, but these reactions are usually mild and will resolve if you switch to a different flavor or brand of toothpaste. Danish researchers first identified the link in 1998.

Too much information

We all get those checks in the mail from our credit card companies, making it easier for us to take out cash advances. But actually, they’re just a hassle, because they require shredding for safety. Del, of Norcross, Ga., said he recently received a new credit card from Bank of America, along with two preprinted checks, with his name, address, and account number. And that’s not all.

“They prominently displayed ‘Your PIN for cash access is: XXXX’ next to the blank checks,” Del said. “This private information that could be used by identity thieves was sent through the mail. Inclusion of our cash access PIN was negligent and unnecessary exposure to identity theft criminals.”

That’s why you should open any and all communications from credit card companies, even if you think it’s just a marketing pitch. Shred any checks or documents that have personal information on them.

Here is what's on consumer's minds today: Unauthorized Charges, Toothpaste Allergy, Identity Theft, More mystery charges, No cavities and Too much informat...

Article Image

Federal Reserve Tightens CARD Act Rules On Lenders

The Federal Reserve has tweaked a regulation implementing the Credit Card Accountability, Responsibility and Disclosure (CARD) Act, and it might turn out to be good news for consumers.

The rule is intended to enhance protections for consumers who use credit cards and to make sure lenders understand what their obligations are when it comes to compliance.

In order to protect consumers from running up unaffordable levels of credit card debt, the Credit Card Act requires that, before opening a new credit card account or increasing the credit limit on an existing account, card issuers consider a consumer's ability to make the required payments on the account. Much like banks were supposed to do with mortgages.

Show us the money

Specifically, the rule states that credit card applications generally cannot request a consumer's "household income" because that term is too vague to allow issuers to properly evaluate the consumer's ability to pay. Instead, issuers must consider the consumer's individual income or salary.

The Fed is also cautioning lenders about promotional programs that waive interest charges for a specified period of time. It says these programs are subject to the same Credit Card Act protections as promotional programs that apply a reduced rate for a specified period.

For example, a card issuer that offers to waive interest charges for six months will be prohibited from revoking the waiver and charging interest during the six-month period, unless the account becomes more than 60 days delinquent.

Watch out for waivers

CardHub.com CEO Odysseas Papadimitriou, a former Capital One executive, says Citibank skirted this rule by renaming introductory rates as interest waivers. More specifically, he says it offered a rebate of 70 percent of finance charges and classified it as a promotional waiver.

Since it’s a waiver, the Citibank disclaimer said it could revoke it at any time, thereby increasing customers’ interest rates even if they were not 60 days delinquent. Papadimitriou cheered the Fed’s move.

“This type of action is in stark contrast to Fed practices spanning the last decade which allowed unsafe lending to permeate unchecked,” Papadimitriou said.  “It is so refreshing to finally see the ‘new Fed’ take a very proactive role in addressing dangerous trends as soon as they pop up.”

More work to do

Papadimitriou says the Federal Reserve needs to continue its role in heading off devious practices by also addressing Bank of America’s proposed $59 membership fees, which he says is an attempt to increase interest rates by calling it something else.

The Fed says application and similar fees that a consumer is required to pay before a credit card account is opened are covered by the same Credit Card Act limitations as fees charged during the first year after the account is opened.

Because the total amount of these fees cannot exceed 25 percent of the account's initial credit limit, a card issuer that, for example, charges a $75 fee to apply for a credit card with a $400 credit limit generally will not be permitted to charge more than $25 in additional fees during the first year after account opening.

The Federal Reserve has tightened some of the new Credit Card rules covering banks....

Visa To Allow Consumers To Pay Each Other With Plastic

Who needs cash? Visa says it will soon allow U.S. consumers to send and receive payments using their Visa credit and debit accounts. Consumers will be able to use plastic to pay each other.

It's not exactly a new concept. PayPal has been doing that for years, though a lot more consumers have Visa cards than PayPal accounts. Also, there are additional steps required for receiving and using the money with PayPal.

Technical enhancements

The new Visa consumer payments service was made possible through technical enhancements to VisaNet, Visa's global payments processing network, and through the introduction of a new Visa transaction type that allows financial institutions to accept incoming funds.

Visa also said it will work with CashEdge Inc. and Fiserv Inc., two providers of electronic person-to-person payment, account transfer and bill payment services to U.S. financial institutions.

CashEdge and Fiserv will have access to VisaNet, enabling them to integrate the Visa personal payment service into their respective person-to-person platforms - Popmoney and ZashPay. This will allow a participating bank's customers to send money directly to a Visa account.

Evolution

"For fifty years, Visa has worked to simplify payments at the merchant point of sale; we are now evolving our network capability to make it easier for our account holders to pay one another," said Jim McCarthy, global head of products at Visa Inc. "Through our agreements with Fiserv and CashEdge, we can accelerate the delivery of new and innovative Visa payments services, and better enable financial institutions to extend these services to customers." 

If you are a customer of a participating financial institution, you'll have the option to select a Visa account as the destination for funds when making a personal payment. Just by entering the recipient's 16-digit Visa account, email address or mobile phone number, consumers can send funds directly from their bank account to a recipient's Visa account.

Fees not disclosed

In its announcement, Visa did not disclose how much consumers would pay to transfer money to each other. PayPal charges members a fee of three percent to accept credit card purchases. While the new service may be seen as a major challenge to PayPal, that company appears unconcerned.

PayPal's eBay unit issued a statement saying it connects to 57 different financial networks and 15,000 local banks in 190 markets. That, and its head start in the personal payment space, will give it an advantage with consumers, the company said.

Visa announces it will allow consumers to use their credit cards to pay each other....

A Novel Way To Limit Unauthorized Charges

Consumers understandably get angry when they find their credit cards have been charged for something they didn't expect.

Sometimes it happens on a "negative option" sale they aren't even aware of. Sometimes it's a case of a merchant, who has their credit card information, placing multiple charges on their accounts and hoping they won't notice, or saying the consumer misunderstood the actual cost.

The online sales of "Your Baby Can Read" have drawn a number of complaints from consumers who say they agreed to one charge but were eventually charged much more. 

"I was told I would have a $14.95 trial fee," Anna, of San Francisco, told ConsumerAffairs.com. "Then my card would be processed another $66.00 if I chose to sign one."

Surprise!

Anna said she paid all the agreed-upon fees, then saw that her card had been charged another $66.

"I called and they told me the invoice states they are going to charge me a total of $214," Anna said. "The person I spoke with on the phone told me I would be charged 134.80 plus the tax. These people are very sleight of hand."

Another consumer, Heather, of Henderson, Ky., had read all the reviews and complaints about online purchases, so went to her local Wal-Mart. She says she's found a way to virtually eliminate the risk of having unexpected charges placed on her credit card.

Cash is king

"I bought the first stage at Wal-Mart for $25 and there wasn't any trial period or fee and I paid with cash. They have no clue about any of my credit cards," Heather told ConsumerAffairs.com. "Wow, a new discovery, going to a store to buy something instead of ordering it on the Internet!! Get some sunlight people and get out of your houses!"

In all fairness, it's possible to be subjected to unauthorized charges in an in-person transaction too, but Heather has a point. They can't keep charging you if your initial transaction is paid in cash.

It's helpful to remember that once anyone has your credit card information, they can essentially place charges on it at will, and you will be required to dispute it. Reputable businesses don't engage in that kind of behavior, but no one can control the actions of their employees 100 percent of the time..

A ConsumerAffairs.com reader offers a tip on avoiding unauthorized credit card charges....

Article Image

If You Want Your FICO Score, Be Prepared To Pay For It

There are lots of commercial Internet sites offering a "free" credit report, sometimes confusing consumers who know that the law allows them access to their credit reports, at no charge, once a year.

But the truly free credit reports are only available at one site - annualcreditreport.com. How do you know the site is truly free? It's the only one that won't ask for your credit card number.

Other sites offering "free" credit reports take your credit card information because, to get the "free" credit report, consumers must enroll in a credit monitoring service for about $15 a month. They are told they won't be charged if they cancel the program within a set time, but consumers have complained that it is sometimes hard to cancel.

Unless you actually want to pay $15 a month for a credit monitoring service, you should probably only use www.annualcreditreport.com to get your credit report.

No free FICO score

But what about your FICO score? Is there any way to get that for free? Unfortunately, the law does not provide for a free annual FICO score, just your credit reports from the three credit reporting agencies, Experian, Equifax and Trans Union.

But your credit score is very useful information to have, so it might be worth paying for it. Banks and credit card companies rely on that score when deciding what interest rate to offer you, so knowing where you stand is important.

While a number of sites may offer a "free" FICO score, rest assured it is the same kind of arrangement as the "free" credit reports. You will have to enroll in some kind of program in order to get the score. You'll have a short period of time to cancel without being charged, but you shouldn't count on that happening.

MyFICO.com

A good place to obtain your credit score is at www.myfico.com, the site operated by Fair Isaac, the company that came up with the FICO score in the first place. While the site does offer a "free" FICO score, it requires you to sign up for a service and go through the whole cancellation drill.

Since a FICO score is valuable information to have, maybe it's worth paying for. One time access to your FICO score, as well as your credit report, is $19.95. But it's one transaction with nothing to cancel.

If you want to try for the "free" FICO score, you can enroll in the 10-day free trial of ScoreWatch, MyFICO.com's service that costs $14.95 a month. Here are the terms of the 10-day free trial, as outlined on the MyFICO website:

"You will not be billed unless you decide to keep Score Watch(r) beyond your 10-day free trial period.  Three days before your trial expires, we will contact you by email to notify you of the upcoming conversion of your trial to a monthly subscription," the company says. " Your credit card information will only be used if you do not cancel prior to the end of your free trial - you can cancel at any time during your 10-day free trial."

There is one way to get your FICO score for free. If you have applied for a mortgage, the loan company is required by law to reveal your credit score.

Despite offers of "free" FICO scores, be prepared to pay for that information....

Video: American Consumers Turning Back to Credit Cards

American consumers are putting their credit cards back to work.  That's good news for the economy but it can be a disaster for individual consumers if they let their credit get out of control.  Mark Huffman reports.

Video: American Consumers Turning Back to Credit Cards. It's good for the economy but can be a trap for individual consumers....

How Secure Are RFID Credit Cards?

Credit cards are becoming more sophisticated objects. This level of sophistication makes transactions easier, but safeguards are important to protect users, according to the Identity Theft Resource Center.

The biggest recent change in credit cards is the embedded Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) chip, enabling what the industry calls "contactless payments."

Contactless cards

In 2005 JP Morgan Chase led the way by introducing their RF Credit Card and coined the term "Blink" technology.  These "contactless" cards could be simply waved in front of a special reader or swiped through a traditional terminal.

An RFID Credit Card is a standard credit card with a Radio Frequency Microprocessor embedded in it.  At its most basic level it is nothing more than a "Read Only" Chip with your personal credit card information embedded in it, which can be read by an RFID Enabled Point of Sale Terminal.

The apparent benefits of RFID credit card transactions are convenience, speed and the elimination of employee contact with the card.  To minimize accidental reading of these cards, they are designed to be read at a distance of one to four inches from the reader.

Hijacked?

Even so, there is some concern as to whether RFID cards can be "hi-jacked" by use of an unauthorized RFID scanner, and then the information used for fraudulent purposes.  It is important to note that there are two parts to this process:  Scanning the card to retrieve the information, and then being able to use the retrieved information to make a fraudulent financial transaction.

The implication in recent media articles is that it is easy to "hi-jack" the RFID information, and that it is easy to then use this information to make fraudulent purchases.  ITRC said it requested information from a variety of technical resources to review this assertion, including information provided by the card manufacturers.  ITRC says its investigation is still underway, but has already established a few facts:

Ability to scan RFID enabled cards

  • Scanners that can "read" the RFID cards are available to merchants and the general public
  • These scanners can interrogate the RFID card, and retrieve the information provided by the RFID chip on the card
  • This is a fairly simple process, and can certainly be done without the card owner knowing that it has been done.

Ability to use the retrieved information for fraudulent purchases

  • The assumption is that the RFID chip provides the same information that is embedded in the magnetic strip, which is the traditional method of swiping a credit card.  So, if the RFID chip can be read, then the perpetrator has the ability to use that information to make fraudulent purchases.
  • ITRC's investigation so far has indicated that some RFID card manufacturers have implemented security features which make it difficult or impossible to use the "hi-jacked" information to make a fraudulent transaction.

ITRC also directly requested information from card issuers, and received information from Discover, MasterCard, Visa, and American Express.

According to Discover

“Contactless payments are secure. Unlike RFID, which can operate at ranges up to 25 feet, contactless payment devices are designed with RF enabled technology that operates at very short ranges - less than 2-4 inches - so that the consumer needs to make a deliberate effort to initiate the payment transaction. For contactless payments, Discover uses added security technology both on the contactless device as well as in the processing network and system to prevent fraud, and with Discover's 0% fraud liability, Discover cardholders have the added protection of never being held liable for any fraudulent activity on their cards.

“Importantly, the Discover Zip contactless card has a unique security feature in that the verification value changes each time you use it -- so that any skimmed data could not be reused.”

According to Visa

“To authorize a payment, you must wave your Visa Micro Tag directly within 1-2 inches of a secure reader at an authorized merchant, and it must be properly oriented. Each time you use the Visa Micro Tag, a unique transaction code is generated, which must be verified through the reader before the transaction can be completed.

“Visa payWave also generates a unique digital watermark for every transaction to prevent unauthorized transactions. Active cardholder participation is required to perform a transaction, as the card or Visa Micro Tag must be within 1-2 inches of the secure reader that accepts Visa payWave payments and must be correctly oriented to be processed.”

According to MasterCard

“Due to a microchip that's embedded inside the PayPass card and because of its advanced encryption technology, it is extremely difficult to copy a PayPass chip and create a functioning counterfeit version of that card.

“In addition, it is unlikely that the details from the PayPass chip could be read and then copied onto the magnetic stripe of a counterfeit card. This is because only a minimal amount of information would be accessible - and not the same information that would be used on a magnetic stripe to conduct payment transactions at the point of sale.

“A PayPass card only sends the account number and the expiration date of the card to a reader, along with a dynamic, one-time-only number that uniquely and securely identifies each specific transaction. PayPass cards do not send the CVC2 code (the three-digit code on the back of the card) or any billing address or zip code information. Importantly, the PayPass chip doesn't even have your name on it.

“For a purchase to be authenticated and authorized via phone or online, typically several pieces of information must be presented - such as the personal account number (the number on the front of the card), expiration date, the CVC2 code (that three-digit number on the back of a card), and the cardholder's billing address. The chip on a PayPass card does not send the CVC2 code or any billing address or zip code information. It doesn't even have your name on it.”

According to American Express

"Expresspay" will NOT reveal your personally identifiable information such as name, address, or other types of information typically required for identity theft, or Card account number. "expresspay" uses encrypted and unique codes for each transaction.  As with all American Express products, Cardmembers are not responsible for any fraudulent/ unauthorized charges on their Cards."

Conclusion

"We will continue to monitor RFID card issues, but at this time we believe in both the technology and the companies that are using it," ITRC said in a statement. "It is apparent so far that although scanning the card can be done, getting all the necessary information useful to commit fraud is probably not easy."

An identity theft group says you are probably safe using an RFID credit card....

No-Limit Credit Card Might Not Be Such A Good Deal

Most people who have a credit card are aware of their credit limit. But lately issuers have been providing some cards with No Pre-set Spending Limit (NPSL), which sounds like a good card to have.

Plenty of credit experts say it isn't.

The problem with unlimited credit is how it affect your credit, or FICO, score. CardHub.com produced a study of NPSL cards and how they dragged down FICO scores. The problem, they found, was in how these card issuers determined "credit utilization," a key part of the credit score.

The study also found:

  • The way that most issuers report NPSL cards often creates high utilization ratios on these accounts.
  • The credit card companies that were least transparent in disclosing this information were U.S. Bank and HSBC. These issuers declined to answer questions related to the study even though this information is readily available to their competitors.
  • NPSL cards lack the predictability of traditional credit cards, and therefore consumers who use these cards run the risk of being declined at point of sale when making large purchases.

The issuers who have NPSL cards that get reported in a way that do not affect the credit utilization ratio that FICO uses are Chase and Citi.

A hassle

The credit reporting drawbacks of these cards, coupled with the fact that No Pre-Set Spending Limit does not mean unlimited spending power as the name suggests, make these cards much more of a hassle than traditional credit cards, the study concluded.

"Consumers who use these cards are not able to manage their accounts the way they can with traditional credit cards, making them vulnerable to hits in their credit scores," the authors wrote.

Because a NPSL card does not have a credit limit, it makes it difficult to determine a consumer's credit utilization ratio, which is an important variable in calculating consumer credit scores. The credit utilization ratio is the percentage of available credit that a consumer uses.

According to FICO, the "Proportion of credit lines used (proportion of balances to total credit limits on certain types of revolving accounts)" is factored into the "Amounts Owed" portion of a consumer's score, a portion that counts for almost 30 percent of the total score.

Compounded confusion

The study says this confusion is compounded by the fact that each credit card issuer reports NPSL credit cards differently to the credit bureaus. In order to understand how the NPSL cards from different issuers affect customers' credit scores, the website contacted representatives from the 10 largest credit card issuers, based on outstanding balances. It also contacted a representative from FICO to understand what information FICO uses to calculate utilization ratios.

"Based on the results of these inquires, we found that not all NPSL cards are included in the credit utilization variable of consumers' credit scores," the authors write. "A FICO spokesperson confirmed that these cards are only included in the utilization ratio if their trade line is categorized as a revolving credit card and either a credit limit or high balance amount is reported. Additionally, if the account is reported as an open line of credit, as opposed to a revolving credit card, it will be excluded from utilization calculations."

The FICO representative explained that in the absence of a reported credit limit, FICO will look to the high balance to use as the 'limit' in utilization ratios. A high balance or high credit is the highest balance reported to the credit bureaus, sometimes within a certain time period and sometimes over the life of the account.

Is there any good reason to have a NPSL card? It depends. Some NPSL cards offer attractive rewards, like generous air miles, and include perks not available on other cards. Still, those benefits should be weighed against a possible hit to your credit score.

A study finds that No Pre-set Spending Limit credit cards can have a negative impact on your FICO score....

Credit Card Chargebacks Under Attack

One of the major advantages of buying a product or service with a credit card is the “chargeback” – the process that allows the customer to dispute a charge if the transaction is not completed satisfactorily.

But now, a New York company plans to change all that. US Digital Transactions Corporation (USDT) is lauching a “chargeback recovery service” that it says is aimed at combating “friendly fraud” by intimidating customers into paying and threatening to damage their credit rating if they don't.

“'Friendly fraud" occurs when a consumer, without a valid reason, refuses acceptance of the charge for a transaction they performed and reports the false claim to their bank/card issuer requesting a refund or chargeback,'” the US Digital said in a press release today.

The company claimed that about 20 percent of the $138 billion in annual credit card fraud is attributed to friendly fraud and said honest merchants are often the victims.

"Chargebacks can be the most frustrating aspect of a business. The merchant must comply with regulations set forth by the card associations to refute the chargeback and most often the merchant ends up losing the revenue. A merchant can also lose their ability to accept credit/debit cards if the percentage of chargebacks is too high," said Greg Wooten, US Digital CEO.

USDT said it would offer businesses both “soft and aggressive options for revenue recovery.”

The “soft” option would consist of “an easy-to-use, fully automated and economical flat fee collection service whereby a merchant sends a series of time-tested debt collection letters to the debtor and receives 100% of all collected revenue. This option will additionally report the debt to all three major credit bureaus.”

The company's press release didn't spell out what the “aggressive” option would consist of.

Credit Card Chargebacks Under Attack. "Chargeback recovery service" offers "soft" and "aggressive" collection options....

Is Digital Credit Going to Make Credit Cards Obsolete

Does the term “mobile wallet” mean anything to you? Just as most everything else is going mobile these days it was only a matter of time before the phenomenon replaced our wallets, along with all those bulging credit cards that we pack in them.

According to a report on CNNMoney.com, credit cards may soon be as outdated as vinyl records as more and more people use their iPhones, Droids or BlackBerrys to pay at the cash register or to loan a friend a few bucks just by “bumping phones.”

Michael Abbott, CEO of Isis, a new mobile payment network, was quoted by CNNMoney as saying, "This is the chance to bring payments forward from the plastic age and the vinyl records age to the digital age."

As smart phones get smarter, more people are expected to use them as swiping devices similar to credit cards to pay their bills in restaurants, movies, or wherever. CNNMoney says companies have been experimenting with contactless mobile payments for years and that 2011 is expected to be the year the technology really takes off because millions of new phones, capable of making contactless payments, are expected to be shipped out this year.

According to research firm Aite Group, pay-by-phone is forecast to make up $22 billion in transactions by 2015, up from "practically none" last year.

George Peabody, director of emerging technologies at Mercator Advisory Group, told CNNMoney that mobile payment is going to see a lot of activity in 2011 and that we're going to start seeing more and more people leaving their homes without their wallets.

On the other hand, Jane Cloninger, director at Edgar Dunn & Company, a consulting firm specializing in financial services and payments, doesn’t believe this shift is going to happen overnight. She told CNNMoney that she believes the mobile wallet will eventually replace the plastic card, but that it's going to take some time because consumer habits take a long time to change.

Mobile wallets

Still, according to CNNMoney, companies like Visa, MasterCard, Google, Bank of America, Citi and U.S. Bank are all testing contactless mobile payments, and many expect to roll out mobile wallets this year.

The senior vice president of online and mobile banking at Bank of America, Michael Upton, says, "2011 is going to be a very exciting, very dynamic year when it comes to mobile payments because it's the Wild West again, with all these players positioning in various different ways to redefine the digital payments landscape."  Bank of American plans to release its own mobile wallet later this year.

Meanwhile, AT&T, T-Mobile and Verizon joined forces with Discover and Barclays in November to form Isis and provide a rival to Visa and MasterCard.  The Isis mobile wallet will let consumers store multiple cards, make payments with the wave of their phone, check balances, receive coupons and use rewards points at the point of sale.

But it may stretch beyond just the money in your wallet. Abbott sees the potential to include your insurance cards, driver's licenses, and other information typically found in a wallet.

Just think of all the things you no longer have to wear or carry as long as you have your smart phone. You no longer need a watch, a GPS device, a computer, a camera, and eventually your wallet.

God help you if you ever forget to charge your cell phone or worse lose it. The other downside is identity theft. Hackers are notorious for breaking into data bases and stealing account numbers. Will this digital world be a safer place than your purse or hip pocket or will cyber thieves and internet pick-pockets be able to hack and download all that digital data? Or will thieves do what they usually do and take the path of least resistance, and simply steal or clone your smart phone?

A Nashville-based Kroll Fraud Solutions, a division of risk management company Kroll Incorporated recently released a list highlighting the top ten data security trends it expects for 2011 and guess what? One of them is that more and more organizations rely on portable devices such as mobile phones stolen devices will continue to be a major source of data breaches.

Similar to what happened to the vinyl record could credit cards become outdated as we use digital devices to pay at the register and how safe is that...

Article Image

The Envelope Please: Best and Worst Credit Cards of 2010

If there was an Oscar for best credit card of the year, the PenFed Platinum Visa Card would be among the nominees, according to CardRatings.com.

The credit card rating website recently released what it considers to be the worst and best credit cards of 2010.

The editors of the credit card comparison site said that among the worst were those cards with high rates, high fees and little disclosure while those rated the best “bucked a trend toward fewer rewards and higher fees” while offering “ value, service, and convenience.”

Among the cards cited for the editors’ worst credit Cards of 2010 were a new First Premier MasterCard that had a whopping 79.99 percent A.P.R. It was cited for having the highest interest rate. Also among the worst was that short-lived pre-paid debit card endorsed by the Kardashians which they said was also the most hated card.

As for the best in the cash-back category editors said the PenFed Visa Platinum Cashback Rewards Card and the Fidelity Investment Rewards American Express Card were at the top. In the airline and travel credit card category, the PenFed Premium Travel Rewards American Express Card and Capital One Venture Rewards Credit Card were rated the best.

The Simmons Visa Platinum and the PenFed Promise Visa Card, meanwhile, were cited as the best low-interest rate cards and the Citi Platinum Select MasterCard and the Discover More Card were cited for being the best low-introductory rate credit cards. CardRatings.com, meanwhile, cited the Chase Sapphire Card and Zync from American Express for being the best reward point credit cards.

Every year, CardRatings.com publishes its Editor’s Choice Awards for best and worst credit cards. This year, the Consumer’s Choice Awards make their debut.

Best cards

The best credit cards of 2010 by category, as rated by consumers, are:

Best Cash Back Credit Card: Blue Cash from American Express

Best Airline Credit Card: Blue Sky from American Express

Best Reward Points Credit Card: Chase Sapphire Card

Best Value Credit Card: USAA World MasterCard

Best Customer Service: American Express   

Worst cards

Curtis Arnold, founder of CardRatings.com said that despite the fact that most credit cards have become much more attractive in the past several months, there have been a few credit card offers that have not followed suit and are in fact what some consumer advocates would label as downright rip-offs. Avoid these cards like the plague and, if you do, you will be glad you did in 2011.

The worst credit cards of 2010, as rated by CardRatings.com, are:

Highest Interest Rate: First Premier MasterCard

Most Hated: Kardashian Kard

Least Disclosure: Best Buy Reward Zone MasterCard

Most Expensive Way to Rebuild Credit: Applied Bank Unsecured Visa Gold Card

From the failed Kardashian Kard to the top-rated PenFed Platinum Visa, here are the best and worst credit cards of 2010...

Despite Law, College Students Still Targets of Credit Card Offers

As if college students didn’t have enough debt from student loans, it appears credit card companies are still targeting them even though the CARD Act prohibits such offers to anyone under 21.

A recent survey of 300 undergraduates done by University of Houston Law Center finds that most of them have received credit card offers. Houston University Professor Jim Hawkins, in an interview with The Wall Street Journal said “there are some things that haven't changed."

Student Solicitation Ban

The CARD Act took effect in February, 2009 and was designed to stop solicitations that lured in students and then left them buried under heavy credit-card debt when they left school. Under the rules, banks and card issuers were banned from offering credit cards to anyone under the age of 21, unless they have a qualified co-signer or proof of sufficient income to repay the debt.

According to the survey, 76 percent of those surveyed under the age of 21 said they had received a credit-card offer since the beginning of 2010 and 73 percent of freshmen say they saw credit card issuers marketing to students off campus. As for the income requirement, 29 percent claimed their student loans as part of the income they reported to the credit card companies in order to get the cards.

Also, 47 percent of freshman reported seeing credit card companies offering tangible gifts on and around campus, another violation of the CARD Act.

Loopholes

Hawkins said the CARD Act should have made it much less likely for freshmen to have seen advertising because the law has been in effect the entire time the freshmen have been in college. However, with so many loopholes in CARD, credit card companies still have easy access to young consumers.

"It concerns me that the marketing hasn't abated," Hawkins said in an interview with the Washington Post.  "I think one answer would be to ban marketing to college students completely. If we really think it's important not to market to students, why not make it easier by imposing an absolute prohibition on marketing rather than imposing certain rules?"

Moreover, college students will be paying back more debt from their loans than ever before.  For the first time ever, total student loan debt has outpaced total credit card debt.  Student loan debt is said to be increasing at a rate of $2,800 per second and is now around $880 billion. 

Students are still targets of credit card companies despite the CARD Act’s ruling that prohibits offers by mail to anyone under 21....

Article Image

Subprime Has Slithered Back into Credit Cards

Do banks have short-term memory problems or has greed once again taken control? The dust has barely settled on what’s left of a devastated housing market, its demise caused in no small part by a flood of sub-prime mortgages to people who simply couldn’t make their mortgage payments. And now, the same thing could happen again with credit cards.

For the past two years, ever since the sub-prime mortgage debacle, banks have been acting somewhat responsibly by making it impossible or at least difficult for people with poor credit scores, those considered to be sub-prime borrowers, to borrow money.

But now, according to CardHub.com, the sub-prime category is no longer taboo. In fact, it says the number of credit card solicitations being sent to people with FICO scores of between 620 and 660 is up 300% in the last six months.

The credit card comparison website says Capital One and HSBC are among the most prevalent lenders going after subprime borrowers because they can charge them higher fees and interest rates.

Wasn’t this the first phase of what got us into trouble three or four years ago? What’s that famous saying, “history repeats itself because people forget?” Is it possible the banks have forgotten the recent past? Or do they believe that this time it will be different?

Subprime has always been an important market segment for banks because it generates more revenue than from more credit-worthy customers. They get to charge late fees and annual fees along with higher interest rates. It’s estimated that on average, lenders received 70% of their revenue from subprime borrowers.

The financial crisis and credit freeze triggered by the implosion in the sub-prime mortgage market forced banks to write off billions in losses of bad debt. But now that they’ve been bailed out and delinquency rates are on the decline, credit card issuers aren’t as worried and once again see these risky borrowers as a way to make more money. At least until they start to default again. 

It wasn’t that long ago when banks would only offer 0% APRs on credit cards to people who had credit scores of 720 or higher. But now banks say credit conditions are improving. Why would that be? The job market hasn’t recovered. The housing market hasn’t recovered. The economy is still limping along and yet the banks say credit conditions have improved.

Are they deluding themselves, or do they know something we don’t? Perhaps, if they make credit available to more people, this will in itself improve the credit market. Could that possibly be the answer?

According to direct-marketing data tracker Mintel Comperemedia.com, one in four mail solicitations sent from issuers for new credit cards are sent to subprime and near-prime borrowers.  Andrew Davidson, a senior vice president at Mintel, was quoted by SmartMoney magazine as saying “the pitch often offers solace, assuring such borrowers that they're entitled to a new beginning or that their blemished credit history doesn't mean they can't get a credit card.”

Odysseas Papadimitriou, chief executive of CardHub.com, says banks are hedging their risk with card terms that aren't all that favorable. The average interest rate for subprime accountholders is about 20%, up from 17.6% a year ago and nearly all of these cards come with an annual fee of $39 on average. He says the exception is Capital One's Standard Platinum card that is free the first year and $19 per year after that. The one saving grace is that the average credit lines for subprime borrowers are often very low, sometimes just $300 to $500.

But then how many sub-prime mortgages had to be sold and then defaulted on before that market caved in? 

It’s back to the future with sub-prime borrowing, which helped create the financial crisis, only instead of mortgages this time it’s with credit cards...

Study: Credit Card Reward Programs Lead to More Debt

About 20 years ago a top economist told me that one reason the savings rate in the country was so low and that so many more people were going into credit card debt was because credit card companies had linked up with frequent flyer rewards program.

He pointed out how people were using the credit cards for everything, from buying groceries to cars to anything they possibly could just to get the miles. He mentioned how one man have even paid for his daughter's wedding using a credit card and then flew he and his wife to Hawaii on the points he earned.

Now comes a study conducted by researchers at the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago that shows credit cards that give cash back or offer reward points prompt consumers to spend more and accrue more debt. They found that just the initiation of a 1% cash rewards program yielded, on average, a $25 reward each month for the credit card company. It determined there was an increase in spending by $68 a month and in credit-card debt of $115 a month.

Credit card companies have long enticed users with an array of rewards programs, from airplane miles to hotel rooms and cash back. The Chicago Fed economists say that in 2005, some six billion reward offers were mailed out by the industry.

Apparently, even small rewards can prompt people to spend more. The study found that in many cases, rewards entice people whose cards were dormant to start spending and about 11% of those who hadn't used their credit cards in the previous three months made purchases of at least $50 in the first month of the program.

The economists looked at 12,000 credit card accounts at a financial institution whose identity they don't disclose over a two-year period ended June 2002. Some of the customers were offered cash-back rewards; others weren't. They found that debts grew faster than spending among those offered cash rewards and that likely meant that people reduced their monthly payments more than they increased spending.

The extra debt could mean two things: People spent more overall or they shifted spending to their cash-back rewards card from some other card.

Research shows that people who use credit cards that give cash back or offer reward points tend to spend more and carry more debt...

States, Feds Amend Credit Card Company Suit

Twenty states and the U.S. Department of Justice have amended their suit against American Express, Visa, and MasterCard to stop them from restricting merchants from offering consumers discounts, rewards, and information about card costs.

 The states are challenging the credit card companies' rules that ultimately result in greater costs to consumers and merchants. Vermont also joined a proposed settlement with two of the companies. Although Visa and MasterCard have agreed to settle the case, American Express continues to fight the allegations.

"Vermont has been a leader in taking on the credit card industry for practices that stifle competition - first through legislation and now through litigation,” said Vermont Attorney General William Sorrell, in announcing his state's participation in the litigation. "In these tough economic times it's more important than ever to protect our businesses and consumers from unfair fees and costs."

 In the case of Vermont, all three credit card companies must comply with astate law that goes into effect on January 1, 2011, which eliminates restrictions on merchants that have been in place for many years.

Vermont's new credit card law

Under the new law, credit card companies must allow merchants to offer discounts and incentives based on the customer's form of payment. For example, a merchant will be able to offer a three percent discount if the customer pays in cash. The companies also must allow merchants to accept certain cards at some locations and not others, and to impose a credit card minimum of $10 if it is clearly disclosed to consumers.

Credit card acceptance fees, also known as "swipe fees," cost U.S. merchants approximately $35 billion each year, Sorrell said. Merchants pay swipe fees each time a consumer uses a credit card to make a purchase.

American Express has the highest swipe fees of any credit card network, charging merchants 3 percent on some transactions. Merchants pass on these billions of dollars in fees to consumers through higher retail prices.

Vermont's existing law and the amended complaint filed yesterday seek to remedy the credit card companies' practice of suppressing competition by forbidding merchants from rewarding consumers who use less expensive credit cards or cash. Allowing merchants to do this should foster competition among credit card companies by encouraging them to lower fees.

The settlement is subject to the provisions of the federal Tunney Act, which requires that the U.S. DOJ accept public comments during a 60-day period. The court will then review anddetermine whether to enter the proposed consent decree.

Several states and the federal government are pressing their anti-trust case against credit card companies....

Article Image

Should You Use a Lender's Club for a Loan?

Loan sharks take note. There's a new lender in town and they don't break your legs when you get behind on your payments. Lending clubs, or what used to be known as peer-to-peer lending, appear to be growing in popularity as banks remain stingy with their credit and only loan money to those with pristine credit and high FICO scores.

Peer-to-peer lending began as a way for cash-strapped entrepreneurs to start a new businesses, expand an old one, or for people trying to consolidate their high-interest credit card debt (the new loan shark) but don't have credit scores high enough to get a home equity loan.

So they find a peer-to-peer lending group that will let them rollover their credit card balances that are charging anywhere from 14% to 29% into loans that charge 11%.

One such place is appropriately called the Lending Club at www.lendingclub.com. Over the past three years, it has matched 23,000 lenders with 18,500 borrowers. It has a total outstanding balance of $179 million, which is small potatoes when compared to banks and credit cards.

Lending Club was founded by Renaud Laplanche in 2007. It was one of Facebook's first applications, which helped attract mostly young borrowers who had poor credit histories or no histories at all.

Today, Lending Club is one of a number of peer-to-peer lenders who fill the gap created between banks loaning to only those with a great credit history and the millions of others who don't but who still need to borrow money. Another peer-to-peer lender is a company called Prosper at www.prosper.com. It holds competitive auctions in which lenders bid to offer borrowers the lowest interest rates. It claims to have over 900,000 borrowers.

35 categories

Lending Club puts potential borrowers into 35 categories or levels based on their credit histories and other data. To qualify, a borrower must have a minimum FICO score of 660, a debt-to-income ratio (excluding mortgage debt) of less than 25% and no current delinquencies, recent bankruptcies or tax liens. They're not completely stupid. In fact, Lending Club rejects roughly 90% of prospective borrowers.

Creditors can choose which individuals to lend to and commit as little as $25 to loans whose total values range between $1,000 and $25,000. They can also become creditors in baskets of loans to debtors of various risk levels.

Lending Club charges borrowers upfront fees and pockets a spread between the interest lenders earn and the higher rates that borrowers pay. It expects to earn $7 million this year and triple that in 2011.

One of the lenders, Craig Jones, is a venture capitalist, who joined the club while waiting for the IPO market to return. In the meantime, he puts up $1.2 million, or one-fifth of his investment portfolio, to be used as loans.

How's he making out? When you compare the return you get to a high-yielding bond, let's say a five year B-rated corporate bond that pays 7.5%, with defaults averaging 3.4%, lenders at the lending club earn on overage 9.6% once you strip away defaults and the lending club's take, according to Laplanche. These days, that's not a bad return.

Lending clubs that match people willing to lend money with those who need to borrow it appear to be growing. Could this mean the end of loan sharking? ...

Discover Bank Sued For 'Deceptive' Policies

Minnesota Attorney General Lori Swanson has filed suit against Discover Bank, accusing it of deceptively charging some credit card customers for pricey optional financial products that the company markets.

According to the compliant, the products were presented as a way for people to protect themselves from fraudulent or unauthorized charges and to enhance their financial security in the bad economy. Discover, one of the nation's largest credit card companies, claims to be in one out of four households with 54 million credit cards in circulation.

"The company charged some consumers for expensive add-on financial products without their understanding that their credit cards would be charged," said Swanson. "The irony is that the credit card company markets these products as a way for consumers to protect themselves from fraudulent or unauthorized credit card charges and financial instability in the bad economy."

Swanson says that in 2009 Discover earned nearly $300 million in annual revenue from the sale of these optional financial products, an increase of over $80 million, or over 37 percent, from 2007. This is in addition to the revenue the bank charges customers for interest and penalty fees (e.g. late fees, over-limit fees, etc.) In 2009, Discover reported net income of $1.3 billion.

The lawsuit alleges that Discover Bank and its affiliated processing company made aggressive, misleading, and deceptive telemarketing calls to sign people up for these products. Swanson said the company first lures the consumer into believing the call is a courtesy call from their credit card company and not a sales call -- that is, that the caller is simply touching base to make sure the customer is aware of all the benefits of the card.

Unaware a transaction was taking place

In some cases, Swanson says the company has charged people's credit cards for enrollment in these add-on products even though the consumer did not agree to purchase anything. In other cases, she says the company tricks people into unknowingly signing up for these products, usually by inducing consumers to say "ok" or "yes" to a benign statement without understanding they are signing up and then treating that response as authorization to bill their credit cards.

In many cases, Discover refuses to make refunds to aggrieved consumers, the investigation found.

A typical telemarketer generally cannot sign up a customer for a product or service unless the customer gives out their credit card number or other form of payment. Unlike a typical telemarketer, Discover is the consumer's credit card company and already has their credit card number.

Swanson says this wrinkle enables the company to charge consumers for extra financial products by making deceptive telemarketing calls in which some consumers did not give knowing consent to purchase the paid products.

Trickery

Swanson said her investigation found that Discover telemarketers used trickery as a matter of course.

For example, in some cases telemarketers read the consumer a purported "disclosure" in which they butcher or alter the text, leave out key words, run sentences together, pause when there is no period, or speed read the text, all to make it incomprehensible to the consumer.

In other cases, telemarketers leave out key terms like the fact the consumer is purchasing something or the price, and instead emphasize portions of the script that do not suggest a sale is taking place, like the company's customer service number. In other cases, the company leads customers to believe they are simply authorizing the company to send them materials in the mail to look over, with no agreement to purchase a product or have their credit card billed.

"People expect their credit card company to help them avoid fraudulent charges, not make them," said Swanson.

Defendants in the lawsuit include Discover Bank, a Delaware state bank; DFS Services, LLC, its affiliated processing company; and Discover Financial Services, the parent corporation of both entities. The lawsuit was filed in Hennepin County District Court and seeks injunctive relief, civil penalties, and restitution.

The State of Minnesota has sued Discover Bank, accusing it of tricking cardholders into buying financial products....

How Military Servicemen and Women Can Get Lower Interest Rate Loans

Mortgage rates might be at historic lows but the interest rates on credit cards and other so-called unsecured loans seem to be reaching levels once the domain of loan sharks. If your credit score falls below a certain number card companies won't bat an eye as they raise your APR to 29.9%.

It's hard enough for most of us to get out from under an ever growing mountain of card when lenders raise their interest rates but for members of the military, it's even more devastating because in many cases they've taken a cut in pay to serve their country.

Fortunately, due to the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act, active duty military personnel could qualify for special protection. This includes putting a cap on interest rate for credit cards, mortgages and other loans at 6%. But to be eligible, you had to have incurred the debt before you began active duty, and your military service must be impacting your ability to repay them.

Although this helps anyone who took a pay cut to join the military, it especially helps members of the Reserves and National Guard, some of whom had to leave left higher-paying civilian jobs for months, or even years, when they're unit is called up. Credit cards, mortgages and other loans taken out jointly with a non-military spouse also qualify for the rate reduction.

You can request the rate reduction on your own or get help from an Armed Forces Legal Assistance office. You may be asked to submit copies of your military orders, earnings statements and tax returns to prove your income has been reduced.

In an interview with Kiplinger's, Samuel Wright, director of the Service Members Law Center for the Reserve Officers Association, pointed out that it is the creditor who has the burden of proof to show your entry into active duty did not materially affect your ability to meet financial obligations.

Wright says any interest above 6% is forgiven while you're on active duty, but it will return to the higher rate after your active duty is over and that higher rate will only apply to the remaining balance. To make the most of this provision, you should try to pay down as much of your credit-card balances as possible while the rate is low and more of your payment will go toward the principal rather than interest.

The act provides other benefits, as well, such as giving you the right to terminate an apartment lease if you have a permanent order for a change of station or are deployed to a new location for 90 days or more. In addition, you can end a car lease without incurring an early-termination fee if you are deployed for 180 days or longer.

You can find more information at the Pentagon Federal Credit Union's website at www.penfed.org.

If you’re a member of the military you could qualify for special protection that puts a cap on interest rates for credit cards, mortgages and other loans...

Article Image

No Limit Credit Cards May Not Be Right for You

You may think having a "no limit" credit card is prestigious and it some circles it probably is, but it also comes with a certain amount of responsibility and self-control -- like a person watching his or her weight needs to have when they go through an "all you can eat" buffet.

But the main thing you should watch out for if you happen to qualify for one of these cards is the impact it could have on your credit score. Now you may think that because it has no limit it wouldn't matter how much balance you carried because there would be no ceiling to which you be measured against.

Nearly everyone knows that your credit score goes down if you carry a balance that comes close to your limit. What you may not be aware of is that even when you don't have a limit, the good folks at FICO still measure that balance against other factors and a high balance can definitely impact your score.

This all came to light when CardHub.com compared the original "no limit" black card from American Express to similar cards offered under the brand names Visa Signature and World MasterCard. Cardhub learned that each card can affect your credit scores in different ways. They can depress your scores, have little impact, or even raise them. How's that for confusing. Moreover, there appears to be no good way to predict the impact on your credit score.

CardHub CEO Odysseas Papadimitriou recommends you avoid the no spending limit card because you don't know how damaging it can be. He adds that the "no limit" designation is an illusion. He says a more realistic term should be "no disclosed limit."

Things get murky

Fair Isaac Corporation is the company that developed the FICO credit scores. It says two key factors in determining a person's credit score are the "amounts owed” category and credit utilization, or the ratio the amounts owed over the amount your creditors are willing to lend. Add up all your balances and all your limits, and you know your overall ratio. So how do they compute a ratio if there's no spending limit?

The answer to that question is where things get murky. CardHub says "no limit” credit cards from American Express, Chase, and Citibank will not directly affect your credit-utilization ratio under Fair Isaac's latest "FICO 8" model. But four other banks' versions of the cards could. And even they don't do so on a consistent basis.

Papadimitriou claims you need to understanding the Visa Signature and World MasterCard are based on ordinary credit cards, with a limit on revolving credit -- the term for the portion of the balance that you can postpone paying in return for incurring interest.

Basically, he says they took a normal credit card, and they tried to retrofit it into a no-preset-spending-limit model. The result is that issuers openly encourage cardholders to exceed their revolving limits each month. At the end of the month, they just have to pay off enough to keep below their revolving credit limit.

Papadimitriou says the card issuers want you to overspend and while they may not hit you with any fees, but your credit score could suffer. In fact, CardHub says so-called "no limit” cards from Capital One and Wells Fargo have revolving credit limits as an actual credit limit. So does Bank of America for its World MasterCard customers.

With these cards, Papadimitriou says, you can appear maxed out to the FICO credit-scoring folks even when you think you have plenty of room left to spend.

Bank of America substitutes a "high balance" - the cardholder's highest balance over some period - as a credit limit for its Visa Signature customers. Whether or not those customers will look maxed out will depend on their spending patterns and for some reason big swings could actually improve your credit score.

To further confuse the matter, Fair Isaac admits that some lenders are still using older FICO models when they compute credit scores. And consumers may suffer indirect effects as well, if significant portions of their spending or available credit are reported unconventionally.

To shed some light on this shadowy world, the New York Times got Fair Isaac to issue a statement saying if one of these cards is reported as an open account, it will not be factored into the FICO's calculation of credit utilization and, thus, wouldn't affect a credit score. But if an issuer reports the card as actually a revolving account with a credit limit or the highest balance within a certain time period, the utilization ratio on the card could potentially be very high and have a negative impact on a consumer's credit score - especially if the consumer spent more than the limit and or had a high balance on the card.

The FICO statement cautioned, however, against assuming that just because a card with no preset limit is included in utilization calculations, it will automatically have a negative impact on a credit score. The ultimate score, the statement said, depends on a particular person's credit profile. That includes how the utilization ratio of the "no limit” card compares with that of a person's other cards. For example, if you have a low utilization ratio on the no preset limit card, then theFICO score could benefit from the card being included in the calculations. But the reverse scenario applies as well. There are cases where including the no preset limit card in the utilization calculation could increase the overall ratio, and have a negative impact on the credit score. Therefore keeping low balances on these cards is the best way to ensure they will have a positive impact on a FICO score.

CardHub.com recently released a study showing the American Express, Chase and Citibank received "good” ratings, while Bank of America, Capital One, Wells Fargo and USAA received "fair ratings." The full results can be viewed on www.cardhub.com.

No limit credit cards may sound great, but carrying a high balance could still have a negative effect on your credit score...

'Kardashian Kard' Riddled With Huge Fees; Sisters Bail Amid Criticism

Just a few weeks after launching their own prepaid debit card, the Kardashian sisters have decided to end their contract with the bank that issued the high cost "Kardashian Kard" after being roundly criticized for marketing it to teens.

And by "high cost," we're talking paying $99.95 just to obtain the card and use it for a year.

CNNMoney.com reported Monday that the fees wouldn't stop there. After the initial 12-month period, the "Kard" would charge consumers $7.95 a month to simply use the card, plus $1 every time they added money to it, a $2 transaction fee for every bill they pay with it, and $1.50 for the privilege to speak with a live operator if there's a problem with it. (For example, "This card is eating all my money.")

It's no wonder Connecticut Attorney General Richard Blumenthal issued a warning to parents on November 26 about the perils of the "Kardashian Kard" and other credit cards marketed to young adults.

In a letter to University National Bank, which issues the Kardashian Kard in an agreement with MasterCard, Blumenthal demanded specific details about the card terms, fees and how it's promoted and sold in Connecticut.

Blumenthal called the Kardashian Kard, and others like it, "feckless financial tools designed to promptly diminish in value with virtually every transaction -- and even when consumers don't use the card at all."

Best known for their reality show on E!, "Keeping Up with the Kardashians," sisters Kourtney, Kim, and Klohe live in a Los Angeles mansion and shop daily for designer clothes -- a fantasy for many teenage girls. Which might be why officials are so concerned about the fee-addled prepaid debit card endorsed by the reality stars.

"This card -- or kard -- appears to specifically target young adults in evoking the name and image of the Kardashian family who showcase lives of luxury and extravagance," said Blumenthal.  "The [Kardashian] family is marketing a dangerous financial fantasy.”

While teens and young adults are particularly vulnerable to getting taken advantage of by high-fee prepaid debit cards, all consumers are potential victims. Especially those ineligible for regular credit cards.

Gail Hillebrand, Director of Consumers Union's Defend Your Dollars campaign, applauded the Kardashians for bowing out of the prepaid debit card business, but warned, "other prepaid card rip-offs are rampant in the marketplace and consumers remain vulnerable to high fees and weak protections."

As consumer frustration with big banks (Chase, Bank of America) grows, so does the number of prepaid debit card options offered by smaller banks. But many consumers may not be aware of all the hidden fees associated with these cards and find themselves getting taken advantage of.

"The newly authorized Consumer Financial Protection Bureau should make reining in abusive prepaid card practices a top priority," said Pam Banks, policy counsel for Consumers Union.

"Kardashian Kard" Riddled With Huge Fees; Sisters Bail Amid CriticismPrepaid card contains unprecedented $100 activation fee, among many others...

Three Strategies To Combat Declining Credit Scores

Due to the recession, consumer credit scores are declining, and since April 2008, approximately 1.2 million people have fallen out of the top credit-scoring tier of 800-850.

Continuing unemployment, falling home values, shrunken investment portfolios, and excess borrowing have made debt repayment more difficult for many consumers.

"Banks tie borrowers loan qualifications and interest rates to credit scores, and many have reset their 'subprime' score thresholds to 660 from 600 before the recession," said Noreen Perrotta, editor, Consumer Reports Money Adviser (CRMA).  "Declining scores are an unpleasant fact of life for many in this recession."

Consumer Reports Money Adviser offers the following three strategies to help consumers fight back:

Shop harder for credit

One thing the recession hasn't changed is consumer choice. You're likely to find that your credit score will have a varying impact on the rates that different lenders might charge you, so it's worth it to do some work to find the best deal.

Big savings can be found by shopping around for the best rate on an auto loan. Car loans can be all over the board for the same credit score. Diligent shoppers can knock two to four percentage posts off the cost of an auto loan. That can be worth $890 to $1,780 over the 48-month term of a $20,000 loan.

Shopping might also save you as much as one percentage point on an adjustable-rate or jumbo mortgage. That can be worth $113,000 over the 30-year life of a $500,000 mortgage.

Find cheaper insurance

Another possible cost of a declining credit score is higher auto and home insurance premiums. Most insurers now base a major part of their premium calculations on a consumer's credit-based insurance score, a close cousin of the credit score. Almost all states allow that use.

The impact of a reduced insurance score varies because different insurers use different methods to calculate scores and convert them into premiums -- all of which are kept secret from consumers. If your insurer hiked your rate because of your score, CRMA's experts advise shopping for a lower premium somewhere else. Start by checking if your state insurance department provides rate comparisons here to find a link to your state's agency. Also consider forming a relationship with an independent insurance agent, who can periodically check rates for a range of carriers.

Improve your score

There are steps you can take to improve your credit score and keep it from moving in the wrong direction including:

  • Fix errors. Your score can be hurt by inaccurate information on your credit reports. So regularly check them by requesting a free copy each year from each credit-reporting bureau.
  • De-leverage. If you can manage it, paying down your credit balances is one of the most effective ways to improve your score. The reason is that less debt owed reduces your credit utilization -- the amount of your total debt as a percentage of your available credit lines. The closer your revolving debt gets to your credit limits, the more your credit score suffers. So try to keep your credit card balances low.
  • Don't close old credit accounts. It might be tempting to dump your credit-card company if it reduced your borrowing limit or slapped you with sky-high interest rates or unfair penalty fees. But closing a card account reduces your total credit line while the total debt on all your cards might remain the same. That increases your credit-utilization level, which depresses your score. If the account is old, closing it will also affect your score because a long credit history is a plus.
  • Get help sooner rather than later. If you're struggling to keep your head above water, the sooner you get things back in order, the better. Your score will probably take a negative hit, but it will be temporary, and each passing month after that your score will gradually recover if you stay on the right track. A credit counselor can set you up with a five-year repayment plan with more favorable terms than you might be able to arrange on your own.  Seek out reputable, nonprofit agencies that employ trained and certified counselors and members of the Association of Independent Consumer Credit Counseling Agencies or the National Foundation for Credit Counseling.

Three Strategies To Combat Declining Credit Scores Consumer Reports Money Adviser says you don’t have to surrender...

New Rules Governing Credit Reports Go Into Effect January First

Who says the government moves slowly? You get no argument here. After eight years of being passed as part of the Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act of 2003, new consumer protection regulations are scheduled to take effect on January 1, 2011.

To prepare us for these new rules, the Federal Reserve has made available an online consumers' guide to credit scores and credit reports which not only outlines the new rules but gives you a refresher course on what a credit score is, how it is used and why it's important to protect your credit history, as if we didn't already know.

What you probably don't know are the new that rules Congress passed eight years ago. They will require lenders to tell you when negative information on your credit reports is going to mean you will have to pay higher interest rates and fees for loans such as mortgages and credit cards.

Basically, the new rules require creditors to provide consumers with what's known as a "risk-based pricing notice" when the creditor provides credit on less favorable terms than it provides other consumers. Under the rules, consumers hit with the less favorable credit terms can also obtain a free credit report to check its accuracy.

The Consumer's Guide to Credit Reports and Credit Scores  tells you what you should do if you find errors. First contact the credit bureau to formally dispute any mistakes. But then you have to wait for the credit bureau to investigate, which usually takes 30 days.

The goal with the new rules is to alert you to any negative information on your credit reports so you can make any corrections, which could lead to better loan terms. Creditors offer better terms to consumers with good credit histories and more costly credit to consumers with poor credit histories.

While a step in the right direction, consumer advocates say more needs to be done to address concerns about credit scores and inaccurate credit reports. They say once you finds an error on a credit report, it's difficult to correct it.

You may want to check out a new consumer’s guide provided by the Federal Reserve that shows how new rules will impact your credit report ....

Article Image

Weight Loss Tip: Stop Using Credit Cards

It's not likely that credit card companies will be forced to post the warning that using these cards could be hazardous to your waistline. But if researchers from Cornell University and the State University of New York are right, they may have uncovered a link between credit card use and obesity.

A new study published in the Journal of Consumer Research shows that people who use credit cards for food tend to buy more junk food than those who use cash.

This could be a major discovery for the two-out-of three Americans who are either obese or overweight. They could kill two birds with one stone just by not using credit cards. Lose weight and reduce their debt.

Authors of the grocery study say they originally tried to find the link between unhealthy food purchases and payment methods. They began by collecting shopping data from an unnamed American store chain. They found that 41% used credit cards, 9% used debit cards, and the remaining 50% paid cash. Further study showed that shoppers who paid with plastic spent far more and bought more junk and impulse items than customers who paid cash.

To replicate their findings, the researchers conducted a similar test on students, who were told that a large retail chain was opening a store in town and wanted to understand what shoppers buy during a typical trip.

Computer screens showed subjects 10 healthy items such as oatmeal and 10 junk or unhealthy items such as Oreo cookies. Credit-card shoppers ended up with about three unhealthy items costing $14.07 while cash shoppers bought only two healthy unhealthy items and spent $9.89 on them.

Next, according to Smart Money magazine, the researchers performed a similar experiment on consumers referred by a market research group, but this time they surveyed participants on their feelings.

Card shoppers again spent far more on junk than cash shoppers, with no difference in spending on healthy food. Both groups reported paying attention to prices and being aware of the nutritional merits of the items they chose. Members of the cash group, however, found paying far more painful.

Researchers have discovered a possible link between obesity and credit cards ...

Federal Reserve Provides Clarity On Credit Reports and Credit Scores

A new online resource from the Federal Reserve provides practical answers to questions about credit reports, credit scores, and the importance of protecting personal credit histories.

The Consumer's Guide to Credit Reports and Credit Scores describes the content of a credit report, explains how a credit score is used, and discusses the role of credit bureaus in collecting and disseminating this information.

Mortgage lenders, banks, insurers, utilities, employers, and other businesses may obtain credit reports from credit bureaus to assess how an individual manages his financial responsibilities.

Consumers need to know what's in their credit report and understand how negative information, such as late payments or a bankruptcy filing, might affect a lender's decision to grant credit.

The guide answers questions ranging from "What is a credit score?" to "How can I get a free copy of my credit report?" to "How long does negative information stay on my credit report?" It contains tips to help consumers improve their credit scores and provides step-by-step instructions for correcting an error in a credit report.

More help available

The Consumer's Guide to Credit Reports and Credit Scores is one of several online Federal Reserve publications, such as 5 Tips for Improving Your Credit Score. It contains such nuggets of information as the importance of making sure information in your credit report is accurate and understanding how your credit score is determined.

Another Fed publication 5 Tips for Getting the Most from Your Credit Card, discusses with consumers the importance of paying bills on time and making more than the minimum payment on a credit card bill.

Many of these publications are available in Spanish.

Federal Reserve Provides Clarity On Credit Reports and Credit Scores New online publication answers questions about credit reports and their importance...

Article Image

More Shoppers Are Using Cash Instead of Credit

Government figures show Americans are shopping again and that consumer spending up 2.2% so far this year, but with a difference. Instead of putting their purchases on credit cards, they are paying with cash in the form of paper money or debit cards.

The Nilson Report (not to be confused with Nielsen) tracks payment systems and it says customers are already showing a strong preference for cash. Even though consumer spending is up, none of the four major credit-card companies have benefited from the increase.

According to the Nilson Report, Visa credit-card transactions were down 1.2% in the first half of the year, compared with the same period in 2009 while MasterCards were used for about 10.2% of all card transactions, also down. Discover transactions also dipped slightly. Only American Express reported unchanged card usage.

Consumers appear to be spending money they currently have, paying for purchases with a debit card or actual cash. The dollar amount paid with debit cards has grown 15% this year while spending on credit cards was up just 1.9%.

Debit-card usage is expected to grow 8% to 12% annually, according to the TowerGroup, which tracks bank cards.

James Brown, emeritus professor at the University of Wisconsin at Milwaukee and former director of the university's Center for Consumer Affairs told Smart Money that a lot of people "are leery of credit cards and don't want to fall back into debt - that's why you're seeing this migration."

Out of favor

There are other signs as well. Gift cards have fallen out of favor. After nine consecutive years of gains, gift cards are on the wane. Sales of gift cards are expected to drop to $86.2 billion, an 11% decline from their peak in 2007, according to CardHub.com.

Why would gift cards suffer? Aren't they like cash? Not really. Shoppers want to avoid pitfalls like expiration dates and inactivity fees that can quickly erode a card's value. Even if you use a portion of the gift card, these inactivity fees can kick in if the rest of the card remains unused for at least 12 months.

Some consumers are selling their gift cards for around 10% to 20% less than face value to third-party sites like GiftCards.com, CardHub.com, PlasticJungle.com and GiftCardRescue.com. Sales at GiftCardRescue.com are up 1,000% through October of this year compared to the same period in 2009. PlasticJungle.com says sales have more than doubled through the middle of this year.

Dan Horne, professor of marketing who tracks the gift-card industry at Providence College, spoke to Smart Money about this trend. He says people would rather use the cash anywhere they like than be restricted to a specific store.

Within a few months, consumers could save up to 2.5% on most purchases by paying with cash. A clause in the financial reform bill allows merchants to discount items for shoppers who pay with dollars. And the Justice Department settlement last month with MasterCard and Visa allows retailers to discourage the use of rewards credit cards or other credit cards they deem expensive in order to avoid the high fees that card issuers charge when a store customer pays with plastic.

The result, according to Smart Money, could be a system of price tiers, where retailers offer different prices for each product based on method of payment - with cash the cheapest. Doug Kantor, counsel to the Merchants Payments Coalition, a coalition of retail trade groups, said retailers would "love to be able to offer discounts for cash” and that could soon happen.

To counter this shift to cash, credit-card companies are offering cash to encourage consumers to sign up and make purchases. Odysseas Papadimitriou, CEO of CardHub.com, which tracks credit card offers says that to qualify for up to $100 cash bonuses, consumers need a FICO credit score of at least 720. Of course, just like cash for checking account offers, credit card issuers expect to make thousands of dollars off these accounts. These cards are mainly offered to consumers who pay in full every month, represent a low risk of default, but who are heavy credit-card users who net credit-card issuers about 1% of the total purchase price each time they swipe their card fees that merchants pay the card companies, he says.

To get the $100 sign-up bonus, you'll have to give up cash, too, at least in the short term. With the Chase Freedom Visa card, consumers have to charge at least $799 in the first three months to get $100, and with the Discover More card, you'll have to charge at least $500 in the first three months for $100. And even then, most issuers post the money as a credit to your statement. Just like the old saying puts it, "you have to spend money to make money."

New data shows consumers are turning their backs on credit cards in a shift back toward spending with cash...

A Great Credit Score Alone May Not Get You a Great Interest Rate

The financial crisis may be behind us but bankers and other lenders are still anxious when it comes to handing out loans. These days, you need more than a great FICO score to impress them. Banks are looking beyond your credit score into other areas of your financial life to make sure you are a good risk before approving a loan.

Some of the new areas coming under scrutiny include your rent and utility payments, your income and home value. Some even look at your banking habits such as whether your direct deposits have stopped. You could be considered a high credit risk if the value of your home declines too much or you have just an interest-only mortgage which means you aren't paying down your principal.

According to the Wall Street Journal, here are some newer ways lenders and financial-services companies are sizing up your financial behavior and credit-worthiness:

Bank-depositor behavior scores. Fair Isaac, the creator of the widely used FICO credit score, is marketing bank-depositor behavior scores, which are used by banks to assess their own customers. The scores are based on balances, deposit records and withdrawal activity. Unlike credit scores — which are most affected after payments are late or credit is maxed out — behavior scores can be a leading indicator of credit risk. They also can help banks identify customers who might need special attention because their direct deposits had stopped.

Income estimation. This business took off earlier this year after the Federal Reserve allowed lenders to use credit bureaus' income estimates to satisfy new requirements that credit-card applicants show the ability to pay their debts. The bureaus use credit-record information, such as the size of your credit lines and the age and size of your mortgage, and plug it into models to predict your earnings. Those estimates also may be used to double-check the income you report on credit applications or to determine if you should be preapproved for credit. You can't see those estimates. But if you are denied credit because of them, you must be given a chance to provide additional information.

Rent payments. An estimated 40 million consumers, including young people and people who prefer to pay in cash, have too little credit experience to generate a useful credit score. But they are likely to pay rent or utility bills, which could help credit bureaus assess their credit-worthiness better.

Credit bureaus say they also would like to offer data on cellphone payments, but have run into concerns over privacy issues, which may require legislation to untangle.

Collection triggers. Credit bureaus can now send daily reports to collection companies when a debtor's financial status changes. For example, if new employment information appears or if a debt starts to decline, a drop in credit use would indicate that the consumer has more capacity to pay and a better chance of repaying other outstanding debts.

Home values. As home values have plummeted and foreclosures have soared in many states, lenders of all stripes have become more cautious. Using home values as a factor in credit decisions doesn't appear to be widespread.

Your wealth. Information about your assets other than homes and cars, which aren't part of the credit record, may soon play a bigger role in your financial life. With a better sense of a consumer's balance sheet, lenders might be able to target potential customers better and also have a fuller sense of their likely risk. Equifax, another of the big three credit bureaus, offers financial-service providers an estimate of liquid wealth as part of a financial "suite" of information.

As all of this becomes a widespread practice, those who are prompt and careful in all aspects of their financial life may have more options — and those who have been sloppy with, say, their bank accounts may be penalized for that.

If you’re looking for a loan, credit card or mortgage, you need to get more than your credit score in order...

New Laws Haven’t Stopped Credit Card Issuers from Using New Ways of Getting Your Money

You have to hand it to the credit card companies. They didn't become the giant profit-churning machines they are today by being stupid. No sooner had the ink dried on the Credit Card Accountability Responsibility and Disclosure Act limiting certain fees did those crafty card companies come up with new and devious ways of charging us even more.

Put a limit on how you can raise interest rates at 29.99%. Okay, then that's the new default rate for anyone who doesn't have a stellar credit rating.

Tack a cap on certain fees. No problem, Bank of America, Discover, Citigroup and J Morgan Chase among others, have simply raised minimum payments on certain customers' accounts in order to increase late penalties. How does that work you ask? Well, apparently the banks have determined that a sudden jump in the minimum payment can increase the likelihood that borrowers will be late on payments. Pretty sneaky, right?

Meanwhile, others are jacking up credit-protection insurance programs and charging customers for coverage without even asking permission.

Want to hear more? A few are aggressively pushing people into prepaid cards that are exempt from the new rules but carry sky-high fees.

Computer says 'no'

Have you tried to get a lower interest rate lately? It used to standard for loyal customers to get their interest rates lowered just by calling to complain. It's not so easy any more. In fact, with the new card rules you would think the issuer's hands are tied. "Sorry, I tried to get you a better rate, but the computer wouldn't let it go through,” was the bank rep's explanation. So now it's "the computer's” fault.

When asked why my default rate had ballooned to 29.99% a bank representative said it was due to the new financial environment. Translation, the new credit card limits said we could so we did.

Some of the new fees are even worse than the high interest rates. Discover and HSBC are pushing insurance that promises to make minimum payments for borrowers who lose their job, and then imposing the fees without borrowers' permission. J.P. Morgan Chase and Bank of America have raised minimum payments on credit cards, perhaps in order to increase late-fee charges.

It doesn't stop there. Cards have revived their annual fees; shortened billing cycles; levied new charges on cards with low credit limits; increased balance-transfer fees, cash-advance and foreign-exchange fees; and they've begun to push what's known as "professional cards." These cards are not subject to the restrictions of the Card Act.

The Federal Reserve tried to do something last month when it announced proposals to ban hefty activation fees and prevent issuers from raising interest rates on promotional card offers until a borrower is more than 60 days late.

The Card Act was expected to hurt bank profits and that lenders could lose an estimated $11 billion in fee income next year alone. This new action is intended to offset that loss. So who gets to pay? We do of course.

Profits from debit cards were also impacted. Earlier this year, the Senate passed a law ordering the Federal Reserve to limit "interchange fees." Those are fees banks charge to merchants each time a card is swiped. Last year, banks collected $22.8 billion in such fees on debit-card transactions, according to CardHub.com, a consumer information site.

So how do the banks react? J.P. Morgan Chase says it's moving away from debit cards. Starting in February, it won't issue debit reward cards to new customers.

So what can we do? Consumer advocates say we should be on guard from the start. Before signing up for a new card offer, find out whether services like payment protection are automatically included. Once you use a card, check statements each month for any billing changes. If you notice a higher minimum payment or a new fee, contact the card issuer immediately.

The Credit Card Act was supposed to help consumers not give banks and card issuers an excuse to raise interest rates and create new ways to charge more ...

Ways to Profit from Low Interest Rates besides Refinancing Your Mortgage

No one knows how long these record low interest rates are going to be around. We've heard Fed Chairman  Ben Bernanke proclaim the only way to grow the economy is through inflation, which usually means interest rates would go up.

The Fed announced another round of quantitative easing, or QE2 for short, and that it was going to buy up some $600 billion worth of government debt. While that could push interest rates even lower, some analysts are saying that would be temporary and that the ultimate goal was to spark a rise in consumerism and an increase in prices. Translation: inflation and eventually higher interest rates.

That's why you should take advantage of the current low interest rate environment and U.S. News has put together a list of ways you can do that:

Obviously, you could either buy a home or refinance the mortgage you already have. But since most people may not be in a position to do that, here are three other ways to profit from low interest rates.

1. Get free money from your credit cards. Some of the best balance transfer offers give you interest-free money for 21 months. Just a year ago, the best deal was for 12 months. Add to the longer transfer periods, the fees on these offers are back down to 3 percent from what use to be 5 percent. These deals offer a great way to pay off high interest credit cards, and they can enable you to climb out of credit card debt faster while paying no interest.

2. While most think of refinancing a mortgage, you can also save a lot of money by refinancing your auto loan. It's easy to compare rates and apply for refinancing loan entirely online. In fact, you never even have to go into the bank. If your current car loan is charging a high interest rate, refinancing can save several hundred dollars a month.

3. Finally, debt consolidation can be a great way to take advantage of low rates. By combining high interest car loans, school loans, credit cards, and other debt into a single low interest loan, you can not only save money, but also reduce the number of payments you make each month. One option is to consolidate high interest debt into a home equity line of credit. If that option is not available, you may consider a bank loan or other line of credit, so long as you can qualify for an interest rate that makes sense.

It’s only a matter of time when inflation returns and interest rates rise so take advantage of the current low interest rates to save money...

What You Need to Know Before You Co-sign for Your Children’s Loan

As children get older their requests become more adult as well including asking you to co-sign for a loan or possibly a rental agreement. It's all part of life in this dreary economy and young people just starting out are having as hard a time at finding meaningful employment as anyone.

You first had to deal with the co-signing issue when they were in college and wanted a credit or debit card. Most students under 21 can't get one without an adult co-signing.

Then when they graduate and want to go off on their own, they haven't lived long enough to create a credit history let alone get a well-paying job, so they may hit you up to co-sign or help with the rent on their first apartment.

Then come the loans. Even when they can get them on their own, the rates they qualify for may be prohibitively high. So you have to decide whether to offer your signature to guarantee your child will pay it back and if they don't you will.

Before you sign on the dotted line, consider this. The Federal Trade Commission estimates that three out of four co-signers are asked to repay loans because the primary borrower has defaulted. Ouch.

Now what do you do? Should you sign knowing there's a good chance you'll end up paying if off? Here, according to Money magazine, are some things you should consider and steps you should take.

First, find out why your child is required to have a co-signer. Then ask the same questions the lender or landlord will: Can your kid afford this obligation? How much of his or her pay will it represent? How does he or she plan to cover the bills if he or she loses a job?

Second, before co-signing a credit card agreement, know how your child will use the plastic. For an apartment lease, consider whether your kid can control his friends because you'll be responsible for damages if a party gets out of hand.

Third, forget the notion that you're secondary when you co-sign: Creditors and landlords will come after you if your child fails to pay the bills. So don't agree unless you can afford the payments yourself.

Fourth, FICO credit scoring treats credit card, car loan co- borrowers no differently than primary account holders. That means your score could dip if your child is delinquent and defaults.

If you were planning to apply for credit soon yourself, you could be denied because a co-signed loan is reported as outstanding debt on your credit file, impacting your ability to borrow.

If you do decide to co-sign, take precautions to curtail losses. Make sure the limit on your child's credit card stays low, such as $500 to $1,000.

On a lease, get the parents of your child's roommates to co-sign with you. That way, it's less likely you'll have to foot the bill for someone else's kid.

If you're helping your child borrow for a car, put the title in both your names. That way if he stops paying, you can sell the car to pay off the debt.

What do you do when your children ask you to co-sign for a loan or a rental agreement?...

The Pitfalls Of Prepaid Credit Cards

In theory, it's a sensible idea for someone who can't qualify for a credit card, and who is trying to rebuild their credit. But many consumers who receive prepaid credit cards find the theory simply doesn't hold up in practice.

A prepaid credit card looks like and works just like a regular credit or debt card, but there is one very big difference. Instead of borrowing the money from the credit card company when you make a purchase, you are actually using your own money.

When a consumer obtains a prepaid card, they send the company the amount they want the card to be worth. For example, if you send in $500, your credit card has $500 worth of purchasing power. At least, theoretically.

With a regular credit card, you are using the bank's money. The bank covers your purchase and sends you a monthly bill for all your purchases. You either pay it off, in which case there is no interest. If you pay on time, there is no fee.

Reasonable terms?

Since you are using your own money on a prepaid card, it stands to reason that the terms would be at least as favorable as a regular credit card, if not more so. But it doesn't work out that way.

Let's return to the example of the consumer who sent $500 for a prepaid card. In fact, they have less than $500 to spend because the credit card company immediately starts collecting fees.

Bevon, of Miramar, Fla., activated her AccountNow prepaid card in June and added $75 to it.

"I first used it at a Citgo gas station to purchase $10 in gasoline," she told ConsumerAffairs.com. "I then proceeded to use it at a department store but unsuccessfully. I then called the customer service department only to find out that they took $9.95 for maintenance fee and I won't be able to use the card until the gas station transaction is cleared."

Mounting fees

Despite the fact that it was Bevon's own money, the bank froze the amount on her card until the $10 gas charge cleared. By then, the fees were adding up.

"My Balance is now $39.00 and I have only used it for a $10 transaction," she said.

One nice feature about a prepaid credit card is you can't spend more than the money on your card. If the purchase will put you over the limit, your card will be declined at the point of sale. But that doesn't mean that you can't end up owing the bank money, something that should be theoretically impossible with a prepaid card.

"I got a First National Bank of Marin secured credit card about nine years ago," Jason, of Wichita, Kan., told ConsumerAffairs.com. "I put $50 on it and spent $21 before calling them and telling them to cancel it. The next thing I know I get a bill for $379.49."

After paying it, Jason through he was finished with FNBM. But he was wrong.

"Two years later I'm getting a bill for $573," he said. "I called them and they said since I didn't cut up the card and send it to them I was still being charged."

Ways to save on fees

In spite of all the fee-laden cards, a careful, savvy consumer can actually find prepaid cards with more reasonable fees. There are ways to save on fees too. Avoiding ATMs and selecting the "credit" option instead of the "debit" option when making a purchase saves money.

For that reason, and perhaps because of rising anger at big banks, a recent Mintel business survey found that 25 percent of households earning more than $100K per year -- the more profitable and desirable customers for banks -- agreed that they would be interested in using prepaid cards. Their main motivation is to avoid overdraft and/or other types of banking fees.

It's hard not to believe that prepaid credit card issuers sock users with huge fees because, up until now, most of the users have been those with little credit and few financial options. They charge them big fees because they can.

If more financially savvy consumers begin increasing their use of prepaid cards, figuring out ways to avoid the fees, it will be interesting to see if prepaid credit card companies find new ways to levy big fees.

A prepaid credit card should be a great thing. For most consumers, it isn't....

Numbers Game: The True Cost of Credit Card Mail Offers

Credit card offers have grown increasingly complicated since 2000, when Congress required issuers to start disclosing pricing information on monthly billing statements. But new research from the Center for Responsible Lending (CRL) finds that instead of providing clarity to consumers about the true cost of their credit cards, issuers responded by adding a confusing array of numbers to their offers

Specifically, CRL's research finds that numbers in credit card direct-mail offers increased 250 percent from 1999 to 2009, and at the peak in early 2009 the average credit card summary contained 33 figures.Much of the increased complexity in offers came from new penalty rates and fees.

CRL also finds that offer complexity varied widely among issuers: in most years, the most complex offer had six-to-eight times as many numbers as the simplest offer.This suggests that it has been issuer choice -- not regulation -- that has made credit card terms more confusing.

CARD Act

The Credit Card Accountability Responsibility and Disclosure (CARD) Act of 2009 appears to have made credit card contracts clearer, suggesting the law is having the intended effect of creating fair, understandable terms.

But credit card pricing remains far more complicated than just a decade ago, thwarting consumers' ability to comparison shop. Regulators must monitor industry practices carefully to determine whether more action is needed to enhance clarity.

The CRL analysis focuses on the "Schumer Box" -- a key summary of terms within each offer. This disclosure, which summarizes costs to the consumer, contains the information most likely used when selecting a credit card. It does not include all card terms, but rather is intended to summarize the most important terms for consumers.

The general structure and the type of information that must be included in the Schumer Box are mandated by law that became effective in 2000 in legislation sponsored by then-U.S. Congressman Charles Schumer.

However, the law does not mandate or necessitate complex disclosures. Rather, the complexity of disclosures is a function of choices made by a card issuer.

Numbers, numbers, numbers

The average credit card offer's summary of terms had 33 figures at its peak in 2009. The most complex summary of terms analyzed had 55 numbers, while the simplest summary of terms had just five numbers.

In the peak period of May 2009, the number of numbers in a summary of terms varied considerably, from 14 to 48. In many periods, the most complex offer had more than six times as many numbers as the simplest.

Complexity of terms

Summary term complexity rose 250 percent between 1999 and the peak period in 2009, but declined 23 percent after implementation of key provisions of the CARD Act of 2009. The average number of numbers appearing in the Schumer Box grew by 250 percent from 13 numbers in 1999 to a peak of 33 numbers in 2009.

In 2010, after the Credit CARD Act, the complexity of contracts declined by 23 percent to an average of 26 numbers. A notable drop in offer complexity was observed after the CARD Act. Most of this has been due to simplification in Annual Percentage Rate (APR) terms.

The shift

The sources of complexity shifted from 1999 to 2009, with the latter year having a greater portion of numbers related to penalty fees and to APR. In 1999, 41 percent of numbers were related to APR, while 16 percent were related to penalty fees.In 2009, 46 percent were related to APR, while 25 percent were related to penalty fees. The absolute level of numbers increased for all categories between 1999 and 2009.

After implementation of most provisions of the Credit CARD Act, 41 percent of numbers were related to APR, while 27 percent were related to penalty rates. However, even as the proportions of these figures remained more or less level over the implementation of the CARD Act, they were associated with an appreciably lower absolute count of numbers than was the case before reform.

Too much info

Each number in a credit card offer can generally be considered a dimension of price. All of these price dimensions must be considered simultaneously so that a consumer can make the best decisions regarding his or her credit cards.

There is evidence that consumers cannot grasp anything close to 30 dimensions simultaneously when making a decision, with previous research suggesting the number may be closer to seven. With a typical credit card offer and average processing capacity on the part of the consumer, over 75 percent of the price information will not be fully taken into account.

If a consumer is comparing offers, this quickly multiplies the number of dimensions involved. For example, if a consumer is comparing three credit card products, just looking at the introductory rate, the length of the introductory rate, and a single long-term purchase rate for each offer results in nine numbers. This already stretches the consumer's cognitive capacity. Consumers often make their best effort to comparison shop, but end up frustrated in their attempt to find the cheapest product.

Why do most issuers put so many numbers in their offers? Complexity in disclosures is a direct result of credit card issuer choices. In most years, the most complex offer had six-to-eight times as many numbers as the simplest offer. Both of these offers existed in the same regulatory environment. The difference was the complexity of the underlying product.

Policy recommendation

The Credit CARD Act appears to have reduced the complexity of credit card contracts, supporting the contention that the law is having its intended effect of creating more understandable and predictable credit card terms. However, credit cards still remain far more complex in their pricing than they were just a decade ago.

Price complexity can lead to a less competitive market by thwarting a consumer's ability to weigh all factors when comparing prices simultaneously and accurately. CRL recommends the trend toward more complex credit card offers should be monitored by regulators.

Complexity is down since Credit CARD Act implementation, but it is still higher than the complexity of offers just five years ago. More reform or rulemaking action by regulators may be warranted if complexity continues to stay high, CRL believes.

Borrower recommendations

Issuers are well aware that there are limitations to consumers' ability to attend to every detail of highly complex disclosures. The less scrupulous among them will give what seems a great offer with a prominent headline interest rate, while making up for it by using a variety of other fees and prices less obvious to the prospective cardholder. Consumers should not be deceived by this tactic.

It may be too difficult to weigh and compare all the prices and fees at once, so CRL recommends consumers choose the simple and transparent over the deal that looks too good to be true

In the end, consumers likely will be better off with straightforward, honest pricing systems than with a 0 percent introductory offer that comes with considerable price changes and fees down the line.

Numbers Game: The True Cost of Credit Card Mail Offers While there has been progress, a new analysis suggests deciding on a credit card remains too comp...

Article Image

How Much Does It Take These Days to Have a Good Credit Score?

Do you know your credit score? As important as this number is most of us don't really pay attention to it until we're about to borrow a lot money.

Well, according to Smart Money magazine, until recently, a credit score of 680 was considered pretty good which basically meant you paid most of your bills on time, "got dinged" slightly when you went shopped for a refi, but had a good enough credit record to get a loan at the best rates. 

Not anymore. These days 680 is second-tier says Smart Money. Now, you need a credit score of 720 to get large loans on the best terms. That includes one of those 0% interest credit cards with the longest promotion or a jumbo mortgage. It adds that 40-point difference between 680 and 720 will cost you thousands of dollars over the life of a typical loan.

According to Smart Money, there's not much wiggle room either, and that lenders place borrowers into brackets. That means someone with a score of 719 is in the same bracket with someone who has a score of 690.

Informa Research Services says that one point could cost more than $600 over the life of an average 36-month car loan, or $2,500 over the life of a 15-year home equity loan.

Too perfect

Here's an interesting tidbit. Lenders actually prefer you to have a score of 720 than a perfect score of 850. Why? Well, if you have a perfect score, they probably don't make much money off of you. Smart Money says that lenders believe someone with a score of 720 is most likely to repay their debts and least likely to default. At the same time, they're more profitable than people with a perfect score of 850, because they're also likely to carry a balance or incur fees - and therefore, to generate profit for the lender.

The change in what was considered a good credit score apparently happened after the market downturn of 2008 and began when Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac settled on the 720 threshold for the best pricing. Because most mortgages are backed by Fannie or Freddie, the major lenders decided to keep the same threshold.

Obviously, reaching a credit score of 720 is harder than 680, especially with more people out of work and unable to pay their bills. In fact, to have a 720 score, according to Smart Money, you would need low balances on credit cards and a 15-year credit history. You may have been late on a couple payments over the last two years but that's it.

Even someone who regularly pays on time could drop from the mid-700s if he applied for several new credit cards recently. Even those who haven't missed a payment but carry balances that are more than 30% of their credit line could be in jeopardy along with those who have a short credit history but pay on time.

According to John Ulzheimer of Credit.com, if you are right on the edge of 720, you need to be careful because a small differences such as one extra credit inquiry - like when a lender looks up your credit score before approving you for a loan, or if a prospective employer pulls your credit report without telling the credit bureaus it's strictly for employment reasons - could put you under. He says the same thing could happen if you suddenly use more of your available credit because of a large purchase, so make sure you pay it off quickly.

As difficult as it sounds to maintain a 720 credit score, there are some folks who have a near perfect score. According to FICO, the company that designed our current credit model, they are out there.

Craig Watts, senior manager for Public Relations for FICO, told MainStreet.com that while most people score in the middle-to-low 700s on their credit scale, less than 1% of the U.S. population or one million people, do, in fact, net a full score of 850. Watts says they tend to be more conservative and a little older.  

Ulzheimer says you don't need a perfect score to get the best benefits. He says anyone a score above 760, is able to get the same benefits as those with perfect credit.

A score of 760 isn't easy to achieve either. MainStreet.com says that to reach the top tier you have to master not just the basics - maintaining positive payment history and a low debt to credit ratio, but you must pay attention to the details as well. If you want to be among the elite in credit scores, this is what MainStreet advises you to do:

  • Have a long and impressive payment history and a clean record
  • Maintain a diverse set of accounts, such as mortgages, car loans, revolving credit lines and credit cards
  • Have a "well-aged" credit report with a long and stellar credit history
  • Have a very limited number of credit inquiries on record, so don't be tempted to open a new store credit card just get 10% off.

Having a Good Credit Score Is Now More Difficult than It was Before the Recession...

New Credit Card Law Hasn't Done Much to Relieve Consumer Dissatisfaction

With the provisions of the Credit Card Act of 2009 now in full effect, a national survey shows a slightly lower level of dissatisfaction among consumers with their credit cards than last year.

However, Consumer Reports says credit cards remain one of the lowest-rated services it has ever analyzed with only 45 percent of respondents saying they are completely or very satisfied with their cards.

Still in the red

The survey, conducted in July by the magazine's National Research Center, also shows consumers are carrying less credit card debt, with median balances of $3,793 -- $1,100 lower than in 2009.

In addition some 23 percent of respondents said they were motivated to pay off their credit cards faster by the Minimum Payment Warning on their bills mandated by the new law. The warning shows cardholders how long it would take to retire their debt and the total amount of interest they must pay if they made only the minimum payment each month.

Of the people who carried a balance, 23 percent owed more than $10,000 compared with 30 percent last year. Still, 18 percent said they wouldn't be able to handle their expenses for six months without credit cards; 19 percent said it would take longer than two years to pay off their balances; and 20 percent didn't know when they'd be able to.

Despite some positive changes, there is still plenty of peril out there. Among other reforms, the card act bars issuers from raising rates in the first year or on existing balances unless your payment is 60 days late. Banks can still impose annual fees, slash cardholder's borrowing limit, cancel their account without notice, and raise their minimum payment. In CR's survey, 47 percent of respondents complained about such experiences.

Best Credit Cards

The best card for consumers depends on whether they pay their balances in full each month, and, if so, what types of rewards they're looking for. Consumer Reports money experts surveyed the marketplace and found that none of these nationally available cards limit the amount of points, miles, or cash-back consumers can earn. None charge an annual fee in the first year. Cards are listed in alphabetical order.

· CASH-BACK CARDS (Higher APRs make these rewards cards most suitable for people who pay off balances in full each month): Amazon.com Rewards Visa, American Express Blue Cash, American Express Costco TrueEarnings, Capital One No Hassle Cash Rewards, Chase Freedom, Fidelity Rewards American Express, PenFed Visa Platinum Cashback Rewards.

· TRAVEL CARDS (These cards offer the best deals for frequent travelers.): Capital One Venture Rewards, PenFed Premium Travel Rewards American Express.

· LOW-INTEREST/FEES CARDS (For consumers who carry a balance or want to transfer a balance): Iberiabank Visa Classic, PenFed Promise Visa and Simmons First Visa Platinum.

Worst Credit Cards

Some of the worst cards with the highest-fees are aimed at people with a poor or limited credit history. The two cards below are particularly fee-laden and may be the worst options available:

· First Premier Bank Mastercard: This card now advertises a $25 to $95 processing charge (which fluctuates by the minute, depending on when you click on the card's website). What's worse is that when magazine drilled deeper into the fine print, it found a $75 annual fee and an APR of 23.9 percent to 59.9 percent on purchases and cash advances (again, depending on when you visit the site).

So cardholders could face a minimum of $100 or a maximum of $170 in fees in the first year for a card with only a $300 initial credit limit. Other fees include an $11 charge for expediting bill payment over the phone and a credit-limit increase fee equal to 50 percent of the increase. So for every $100 that First Premier increases the cardholder's credit limit it charges him $50. Also, look out for copycats of this card. First Premier Bank markets very similar cards under the names Centennial and Aventium.

· Platinum Zero Secured Visa from Applied Bank: The Platinum Zero's marketing trades off its name -- zero percent APR on purchases, zero application fee, zero annual fee. But Consumer Reports found the zero fees end about halfway through the terms and conditions with a $9.95 monthly "maintenance" fee that equates to $119.40 annually.

If cardholders are late paying their bill, they will get hit with a fee of up to $35. And though the card claims to charge zero percent APR on purchases, the agreement states, "There is no grace period for the account. Interest charges accrue on purchases, cash advances and our charges beginning on the date the transaction occurs or on the first day of the billing cycle in which the transaction is received by us or, at our option, the date the transaction is posted to your account."

Consumer Reports Credit Card Use survey is based on an online nationally representative sample of American adults, conducted by the CR National Research Center. A total of 1,212 interviews were completed among adults aged 18+. Interviewing took place between July 3 and July 22, 2010. The margin of error is +/- 3.5 points at a 95 percent confidence level.

A national survey shows a slightly lower level of dissatisfaction among consumers with their credit cards than last year...

Visa, MasterCard Settle Antitrust Lawsuit; American Express Fights On

Seven states today joined the U.S. Department of Justice in a civil antitrust lawsuit challenging rules made by American Express, MasterCard and Visa that prevent merchants from offering consumers discounts, rewards and information about card costs, ultimately resulting in consumers paying more for their purchases.

"When you see a sign on a cash register requiring a minimum purchase or extra fee for using a credit card, it's because of the unfair practice established by these companies," Ohio Attorney General Richard Cordray said. "Merchants are charged a 'swipe fee' for each brand of credit card — but they can't tell consumers what those costs are or otherwise reward consumers for using less expensive credit cards to make a purchase. Those agreements stifle competition at the cash register. And we all know how those 'gotcha' fees add up."

The attorneys general of Connecticut, Iowa, Maryland, Michigan, Missouri, Ohio and Texas also signed onto the litigation, which was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York.

Visa, MasterCard and American Express handled more than $1.6 trillion in transactions last year, Cordray said.

"Accepting credit cards costs U.S. merchants $35 billion each year. Clearly it is vital for small businesses to be able to conduct credit card transactions, but they should be able to use all the leverage they can to get the best deal for themselves and to pass the savings on to their customers."

Visa and MasterCard settled with the Department of Justice immediately after the complaint was filed. If approved by the court, the two companies will be required to allow merchants to offer discounts, incentives and information to consumers to encourage the use of payment methods that are less costly.

"With today's lawsuit, we are sending a clear message: We will not tolerate anticompetitive practices," said U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder. "We want to put more money in consumers' pockets, and by eliminating credit card companies' anticompetitive rules, we will accomplish that."

The proposed settlement requires MasterCard and Visa to allow their merchants to:

· Offer consumers an immediate discount or rebate or a free or discounted product or service for using a particular credit card network, low-cost card within that network or other form of payment.
· Express a preference for the use of a particular credit card network, low-cost card within that network or other form of payment.
· Promote a particular credit card network, low-cost card within that network or other form of payment through posted information or other communications to consumers.
· Communicate to consumers the cost incurred by the merchant when a consumer uses a particular credit card network, type of card within that network or other form of payment.

The proposed settlement allows any merchant that only accepts Visa and MasterCard to take advantage of the relief immediately.

Amex case continues

The ongoing litigation against American Express seeks to allow merchants that accept American Express to engage in the same kind of discounting and encouragement that the proposed settlement with MasterCard and Visa allows. Until American Express's restraints on merchants are lifted, the many merchants that accept American Express, as well as Visa and MasterCard, will not be able to take full advantage of their new options under the proposed settlement, according to the Justice Department.

American Express Company, the parent of American Express Travel Related Services Company Inc., is a New York corporation, with its principal place of business in New York City. Cardholders used American Express credit and charge cards for $419.8 billion in purchases in 2009. MasterCard is a Delaware corporation with its principal place of business in Purchase, New York. Cardholders used MasterCard credit and charge cards for $476.9 billion in purchases in 2009. Visa is a Delaware corporation with its principal place of business in San Francisco. Cardholders used Visa credit and charge cards for $764.2 billion in purchases in 2009.

Seven states today joined the U.S. Department of Justice in a civil antitrust lawsuit challenging rules made by American Express, MasterCard and Visa....

Credit Card Marketers Targeting Students Get New Scrutiny



It used to be that the Freshman 15 referred to the 15 extra pounds freshmen put on when they left home for college. These days the Freshman 15 is as likely to refer to the $15,000 in debt college students can accumulate in no time.

In an effort to curtail the temptation for college students who may lack financial literacy skills, New York Attorney General Andrew Cuomo has launched a statewide investigation into deceptive credit card marketing practices that target college students through their colleges.

Cuomo has sent letters to every college and university in New York requesting that the schools submit any exclusive contracts they currently have with credit and debit card companies so that his office can examine them for problematic marketing practices. The letters also call on the schools to adopt policies that will help students avoid getting saddled with credit card debt before their graduation.

Cuomo has already investigated conflicts of interest in the student lending industry, which led to nationwide reforms. Like student loans, credit cards are a major cause of students increasing debt burdens. Cumom says banks and credit card companies target students in part because they are less financially savvy and more likely to incur fees and penalties that result in substantial profits for credit card companies.

Mountain of debt

Todays students are facing a growing mountain of debt that can burden them long after graduation, Cuomo said. As a new school year begins, we want to make sure that colleges and universities are doing all that they can to help students avoid financial dangers. Especially in this difficult economy, schools must ensure that credit card companies are not engaging in deceptive marketing practices and jeopardizing the futures of their students.

The Attorney Generals investigation concerns deceptive credit card marketing practices that have targeted students, such as: Schools have given marketers their students personal contact information - without students permission - to allow companies to solicit students by mail, telephone, and online.

Credit card companies have bombarded students with solicitations at student centers, athletic events, orientations, classroom buildings, and other campus locations.

Credit card companies pay schools for the exclusive right to market cards to their students and to brand cards with their insignia. Schools have entered into these deals without evaluating if the terms of the cards are in their students best interests and without a competitive bidding process.

Selling out students?

Some schools have had a provision in their contracts with credit card companies that provide the schools with a percentage of the finance charges assessed to certain credit card accounts.

Companies have lured students by providing free gifts and food when they applied for a credit card.

As part of the investigation, Attorney General Cuomo has sent letters to the approximately 300 colleges and universities in New York calling on the schools to:

• Submit any exclusive contracts they currently have with credit and debit card companies for an evaluation by his office. The Attorney Generals office will review the contracts for any problematic practices that put students at risk.

• Ensure that their practices comply with the provisions of a 2009 federal law, the Credit Card Accountability, Responsibility, and Disclosure Act (the Credit CARD Act), which provides new protections to college students from deceptive credit card marketing practices and unfair credit card terms, and other recent changes in federal law concerning debit cards.

• Educate their students about the serious consequences of credit card debt by offering financial literacy programs. Many college students do not understand the negative effects that late payments will have on their credit history or the far-reaching problems that a poor credit history can cause.

Cuomo cites figures showing the average college student graduates with nearly $4,100 in credit card debt, on top of an average of $20,000 in loans for students at four-year colleges. This combined debt burden can be overwhelming for new graduates, he says, particularly as they face the uncertainties of todays difficult economic climate.

He says credit card debt has been found to slow students progress toward obtaining a college degree, as some students become forced to drop out of college and obtain full-time employment to meet their debt obligations. High-interest credit card debt limits graduates career choices and threatens students employment prospects, since many employers check applicants credit scores during the hiring process.

Credit Card Marketers TargetingStudents Get New Scrutiny...

Avoiding Fees Under New Credit Card Rules


The last of a series of new credit card rules took effect this week, offering new protections for consumers. But it still requires vigilance if you want to avoid high rates and fees.

The new rules are part of the Credit Card Accountability, Responsibility, and Disclosure (CARD) Act that became law law earlier this year. Like previous changes, these new rules are designed to protect consumers by adding clarity and transparency to interactions between card issuers and holders.

However, as these new rules take away revenue opportunities for card companies, issuers are raising other fees or creating new ones to compensate. Bills.com, an online money resource, cautions consumers to be aware of the new rules and also learn how to avoid new fees.

"Unfortunately, one of the unintended consequences of these new regulations is that consumers must be more vigilant than ever as we enter a period of uncertainty surrounding fees and services," said Ethan Ewing, president of Bills.com. "These actions by most card issuers are perfectly legal, but they are certainly outside the spirit of the new law."

The first rounds of changes brought on by the CARD Act required issuers to provide more notice about interest rate increases to consumers, end controversial practices such as inactivity fees, and required more transparent communication around payment windows and information.

Changes in the law

The final set of changes that took effect on August 22nd, 2010 include:

• Maximum limit on late fee penalties of $25 or no more than your minimum payment due. The one exception allows for high penalties if the cardholder has multiple late payments within the past six months.

• Limiting penalties to one charge per issue. For example, the issuer cannot charge an additional penalty for each day a payment is late.

• Any increase in interest rates must be accompanied by a clear explanation for the reason behind the increase.

• Issuers must re-evaluate any interest rate increase six months after it is instituted to determine if there is cause to revoke the increase.

• The official end to inactivity fees so that issuers can no longer charge for not using a credit card over a certain time period.

Consequences of changes

These changes have not occurred in a vacuum. Because they mean card issuers will realized diminished revenue, these companies have begun to identify workarounds or even new fees to supplement their losses. The most straightforward example of these changes is a rise in annual fees by many card issuers.

According to a report by Pew Charitable Trusts, the industry's median annual fee on bank credit cards has jumped 18 percent between July 2009 and March 2010. Similarly, issuers have begun to raise balance transfer fees and foreign transaction fees, shorten billing cycles, and issue rebate cards that are exempt from the CARD Act to combat rate increases. Additionally, some issuers are skirting the ban on inactivity fees by raising annual fees but waiving or reducing them if cardholders meet an annual spending threshold.

Solutions

Bills.com suggests six strategies In order to avoid these fees:

1. Monitor your communications from your credit card issuer.

One of the best ways to stay abreast of changes specific to your cards or situation is to closely monitor information sent from your issuer. New regulations require much greater disclosure on all changes, so any update will be sent to your attention. Be alert for all mailings and read them carefully before throwing away or destroying.

2. Maintain prompt payment status with your credit card company.

Despite all these changes, the simplest way to avoid fees is to pay your credit card bills on time. By missing or being late on a payment you will incur fees, potentially increase your interest rate, and lower your overall credit score.

3. Pay down high balances to improve credit card utilization.

This will show that you can responsibly manage your credit limit, minimizing the chance of higher tiers of interest rates or reductions in credit limit. Additionally, better credit utilization will help boost your credit score.

4. Maintain activity on your credit card accounts.

By using the revolving credit lines that you need or want to keep and promptly paying on them, you can help avoid cancellation of those credit card accounts. This will also help avoid faux inactivity fees and help boost your credit score, while having a long existing credit line closed could lower your score.

5. Avoid over-limit fees through responsible spending habits.

Credit card issuers have begun to charge fees for opt-in over-limit coverage. By remaining aware of credit limits and balances, consumers can avoid a need for this service and these fees altogether.

6. New regulations do not apply to corporate or small business cards.

This means some small business owners might consider using personal cards for business expenses because of fee and rate limitations. However, these owners should remain cautious because their personal credit scores could suffer in the event of missed payments or defaults. Conversely, be aware of companies that are increasing solicitations for corporate card members to avoid new regulations.

As a result of the reforms passed in May 2009, many credit card issuers have increased interest rates and lowered credit limits for millions of credit card customers. The accounts have been closed unilaterally. As a result, millions of consumers have less access to credit than they did a year ago.

Avoiding Fees Under New Credit Card Rules...

Pre-Paid Phone Card Seller Settles With Maryland


Consumers should always exercise care in purchasing a pre-paid telephone calling card because some are of little or no value. Others don't provide the calling minutes the ads promise.

In Maryland, Attorney General Douglas Gansler says that was the case with cards promoted by Telmex USA, LLC (Telmex), a subsidiary of Telefonos de Mexico, S.A.B. de C.V., the primary telecommunications carrier for Mexico.

Telmex sells telephone calling cards for users to make international calls to more than 100 different cities outside the United States, including major cities in Latin and South America, Africa, Europe and Asia.

Telmex sells its prepaid calling cards to a network of distributors that sell the calling cards to convenience stores, grocery markets and check cashing stores. In Maryland, Telmex sold its cards -- through its distributors and their retailers -- largely to Latino consumers residing in Prince George's and Montgomery counties who have relatives living outside the US.

Telmex's posters and point-of-sale advertisements promised that the cards would deliver a large number of calling minutes to specified countries. For example, one poster promised that its $5.00 "Sonrisa" brand prepaid calling card would deliver 1250 calling minutes to Mexico City, Guadalajara or Monterrey.

Fewer minutes than advertised

Gansler alleged that the Sonrisa card and many other cards sold by Telmex actually delivered substantially fewer minutes than promised in Telmex's advertisements. Telmex sold its prepaid calling cards under a number of different brand names including "TXT2 Communications," "Tier One," "Oro Honduras," "Lunatico," "La Nativa," "La Deportiva," "La Pantera," "Sonrisa," "La Botantita DMV," "Che Cala" and "El Aventurero." Telmex denied that it had violated the Consumer Protection Act.

"Consumers have a right to receive what they are promised," said Gansler. "Through today's settlement, Telmex USA and all of its distributors must reform their practices and deliver the calling minutes that they promise to consumers."

Under the terms of the settlement reached with Gansler's office, Telmex has agreed not to sell any prepaid calling cards to Maryland consumers unless the purchaser can obtain all of the number of minutes that are advertised when he or she uses the card for phone services.

The settlement also contains injunctive relief concerning how Telmex must offer its cards to consumers, including a requirement that it more clearly disclose any fees that will be applied to its cards when they are used. Telmex also agreed that it will require its distributors to comply with the terms of the settlement.

Telmex agreed to pay $60,000 in restitution, which the attorney general will use to fund a state agency or charitable program to benefit people who may have been affected by the actions which led to the settlement with Telmex. Telmex has also agreed to pay a $90,000 civil penalty and $45,000 for costs.

Pre-Paid Phone Card Seller SettlesWith Maryland...

Credit Card Reform Act Working, Report Finds

July 22, 2010
While it was predicted that the new Credit CARD Act passed last year would create some unforeseen problems for consumers, the new law appears to be working, according to the Pew Health Group's Safe Credit Cards Project.

At least, so far.

The group's report says most of the practices deemed "unfair" or "deceptive" by the Federal Reserve have disappeared from new credit card offers since federal passage of the CARD Act. However, the group warns, new trends have emerged that could cost cardholders significantly.

The report finds issuers have eliminated practices such as "hair trigger" penalty rate increases (disproportionate charges for minor account violations), unfair payment allocation, and raising interest rates on existing balances. However, Pew's research also highlights a sharp rise in cash advance fees, continued widespread use of other penalty interest rates and an emerging trend of credit card companies failing to disclose penalty interest rates in their online terms and conditions.

"While it's been less than a year since passage of the Credit CARD Act, the new law appears to be working for millions of Americans who have credit cards," said Shelley A. Hearne, managing director of the Pew Health Group. "The elimination of most of the 'unfair' or 'deceptive' practices of the credit industry since we last surveyed the marketplace marks a major milestone in the move to make credit cards safer, transparent and more fair for consumers. Most of the news is good, but we are seeing the rise of new harmful behavior."

The Pew Safe Credit Cards Project said it has examined all consumer credit cards offered online by the nation's 12 largest banks and 12 largest credit unions. Together these institutions control more than 90 percent of the nation's outstanding credit card debt. For this latest report, which measures how the industry has changed since the passage of the Credit CARD Act, Pew gathered data in March 2010 on nearly 450 cards.

Findings

• Many of the most troublesome practices of the credit card industry have been eliminated. A credit card issuer can no longer unilaterally decide to raise interest rates on existing balances. Likewise, practices including "hair trigger" penalty rate increases, unfair payment allocation, and over-limit fees without prior consent are a thing of the past. Earlier Pew research found that before the implementation of the law, 100 percent of the credit cards surveyed included at least one of these practices.

• Beyond the requirements of the new law, there are new practices that benefit consumers. Fewer than 25 percent of all cards examined had an over-limit fee, compared with more than 80 percent of cards in July 2009. Additionally, mandatory arbitration clauses, which can limit a consumer's right to settle disputes in court, are now found in 10 percent of cards versus 68 percent in July 2009.

• Predictions that legislation would spawn the growth of new fees have yet to materialize. There was minimal change in the number of cards that include an annual fee (down one percentage point from July 2009 to March 2010). During that period, the median size of these fees increased from $50 to $59 for banks and from $15 to $25 for credit unions.

• Some disclosures stopped including the size of penalty interest rates even as issuers reserved the right to impose them. At least 94 percent of bankcards and 46 percent of credit union cards came with interest rates that could go up as a penalty for late payments or other violations. But nearly half these warnings failed to inform the consumer of the actual penalty interest rate or how high it could climb.

"Although we applaud changes by the card industry to create a fairer and more transparent marketplace, our research shows that some challenges remain," said Nick Bourke, director of Pew's Safe Credit Cards Project and report co-author. "For the first time, we have seen credit card disclosures warning consumers that interest rates could go up as a penalty for certain actions, but not stating how high those rates could go. Federal regulators should pay attention to this problematic new trend. When issuers withhold vital pricing information, it leaves cardholders in the dark and puts their financial security at risk, which is why federal regulations have long required issuers to disclose their rates and fees up front."

Disclosure

The report concludes that federal bank regulators should enforce existing regulations that require companies to disclose full and reliable credit card penalty rate information. It also says the Federal Reserve should prohibit issuers from charging penalty interest rates that are higher than initially disclosed when the consumer opened the card account.

The report also shows that surcharge fees for cash advances rose sharply between July 2009 and March 2010. Bank cash advance and balance transfer fees increased on average by one-third during this period, from three percent of each transaction to four percent. Credit union cash advance fees went up by one quarter, from two percent to 2.5 percent.

Other pricing data are also included in the report, showing recent increases in a variety of credit card interest rates and fees.

Credit Card Reform Act Working, Report Finds...

How To Cancel A Credit Card

Many financial experts advise against closing a credit card account, noting the negative impact it can have on your credit report.

But if you decide you should close an account, make sure it's really closed. Let the cautionary tale from Jack, of Topeka, Kan., serve as a warning.

It started in January 2008, when Jack said he received a letter from Tribute Mastercard informing him that in May of that year, the company would begin charging a ten dollar monthly fee. They included an 800 number for customers who chose to opt out.

"I called this number and spoke to a company rep who barely spoke English and told him that I wanted to cancel my account," Jack told ConsumerAffairs.com. "He told me that the account was closed and that I should destroy the card. I cut the card up and threw it away."

But simply telling the customer service rep to close the account wasn't enough. In May 2008, Jack said he got a bill from Tribute Mastercard for ten dollars.

"I called the company and told them I had cancelled the card in January," Jack said. "The person I spoke to said there was no record of my cancellation, but that he would close the account."

The next month Jack said he received a bill from Tribute Mastercard for the ten dollar monthly maintenance fee plus a late fee for not paying the previous charge. He called the company again and was told to contact the dispute resolution rep.

"I sent a letter and received no response, so I called the company again," Jack said. "I told the customer service person that I was not responsible for the incompetence of their employees and that I wasn't going to pay the bill. He said they would take me to court. I told him I was going to file a complaint with the Attorney General."

From zero to $300

A few months ago, Jack got a letter from a collection agency. He said the letter demanded $300 to settle the account.

"I sent them a certified letter explaining the situation and that I would never pay Tribute Mastercard or them a dime," Jack said. "They trashed my credit rating."

Jack says the "delinquent account" was reported to credit agencies and his credit rating was lowered. His charge card at Home Depot was cancelled because of the report, even though he says he had never made a late payment on any of his other cards.

And all of this because Jack tried to cancel a credit card with a zero balance to avoid paying a monthly $10 fee.

Assume nothing

What should Jack have done instead? It's not a case of "instead," but rather "in addition to." Starting with a phone call to the company's customer service rep was the right thing to do, but credit experts say it shouldn't have stopped there.

Jack should have told the rep to note in the file that the account is being closed at the customer's request. He should have asked for a name and address to mail a written notice of cancellation. He should have asked for the customer service rep's name and note the date and time of the cancellation call.

Because mistakes can happen, Jack should have next written a short cancellation letter to the card issuer, to the attention of the name provided. He should also have requested written confirmation of the account's closure.

This last step may be the most important. Until you have confirmation in writing that you account is closed, it might not be. If it isn't, service charges and late fees could be adding up every month.

But if you decide you should close an account, make sure it's really closed. Let the cautionary tale from Jack, of Topeka, Kan., serve as a warning....

Credit Card Companies Raise Rates On New Offers

June 3, 2010

You probably don't go through the credit card offers that come in the mail each week and methodically compare the interest rates. But CreditCards.com does, and reports the rates on those new offers keep going up.

In its latest report, for the week of May 30, the website tracks about 95 of the most popular credit cards in the country, including cards from dozens of leading U.S. firms. Not counting "teaser" rates, the average rate was 14.23 percent, up from 14.17 percent the previous week. Six months ago the average rate was 12.71 percent.

One of the biggest rate hikes in the last six months was in the category of business credit cards. Six months ago the average was 9.74 percent while this week the average on new card offers was 12.96 percent.

Cards for people with bad credit carry an average introductory rate of 19.75 percent this week, up from 13.74 percent six months ago.

Capital One raised rates on three cards, each by roughly two percentage points. Other issuers were also active: Discover lowered the bottom end of its student card's APR range, and Cabela's slightly increased the top end of its Visa card's APR range.

Capital One didn't respond to a request for comment, and Discover said it doesn't comment on rate strategies, the website said. Cabela's said its APR changed due to movement in the card's index -- the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) -- the British equivalent of the U.S. prime rate. Most U.S. cards are pegged to prime.

The CreditCards.com credit card rate survey is conducted weekly, using offer data from the leading U.S. card issuers' Web sites. Introductory offer periods and regular interest rates will vary with applicants' credit quality and issuer risk-based pricing policies.

Credit Card Companies Raise Rates On New Offers...

Eight Ways To Avoid Future Credit Card Pitfalls

May 26, 2010

The credit card reform legislation Congress passed one year ago is now mostly in effect. Much of it took effect in February and the remainder becomes effective August 22, 2010. But does that mean your problems are over? Probably not. The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) says it's possible consumers could face account changes in the future, such as interest rate increases on future transactions and the imposition of new fees or penalties.

Here are eight ways to avoid potential pitfalls in the new world of credit cards.

1. Understand your right to cancel a credit card before certain significant account changes take effect.

Under the new law, card issuers now must generally tell customers about certain changes in account terms -- in areas such as interest rate and fee increases -- 45 days in advance, up from 15 days in the past. In that same notice, they must inform consumers of their right to cancel the card before certain account changes take effect. These notices may come with your credit card bill or through a separate communication.

"It's important to read everything from your card issuer, even what appears to be junk mail," said Kathleen Nagle, FDIC Associate Director for Consumer Protection. "Be aware of when the new rate or fee will take effect, so you can have enough time to shop around for a new card, if necessary."

Consumers who notify their card company to cancel their card before fees are increased or certain other significant changes take effect will still be required to repay the outstanding balance, but they cannot be required to repay it immediately. However, the card company can increase the minimum monthly payment, subject to certain limitations.

Also note that there are exceptions to the 45-day notice requirement. For example, you will generally not receive advance notice of a rate increase on a card with a variable interest rate that will fluctuate based on an advertised index, such as the prime rate.

2. Keep an eye on your credit limit.

Some people, even those with good credit histories, have recently seen their credit limits cut back. Reductions in credit lines can be harmful because your borrowing power will be diminished. Also remember that your credit score is based, in part, on what percentage of your credit limit you are using and how much you owe. Borrowers who carry large balances in proportion to their credit limit may see their credit scores fall. And a lower credit score can make it difficult or more expensive to get new credit in the future.

How can you reduce the risk that your credit limit will be cut or your credit card account will be canceled? One factor that credit card companies consider is how you pay your bills.

"It's important to show a steady, timely payment history," said Evelyn Manley, a Senior Consumer Affairs Specialist at the FDIC.

Paying all your credit-related bills by the due date -- that includes your credit card bills as well as your car loan, mortgage and other debts -- shows that you're a responsible borrower.

Also, pay as much of your credit card bill as you can each month. If possible, pay in full, but definitely try to pay more than the minimum balance due.

What should you do if you've already had your credit limit cut? Put a renewed focus on lowering the amount of money you owe on your credit cards.

Also, consumers who have difficulty making their minimum payments on time may benefit from speaking with a reputable credit counselor to get help or guidance at little or no cost.

3. Decide how you want to handle transactions that would put you over your credit limit.

Under the new law, no fees may be imposed for making a purchase or other transaction that would put your account over the credit limit unless you explicitly agree, in advance, that the credit card company can process these transactions for you and charge a fee.

"Even if you agree to over-the-limit fees, you have the right to change your mind down the road," said Luke W. Reynolds, Chief of the FDIC's Community Outreach Section. "You would simply instruct your card issuer to deny any transactions that would exceed your credit limit and would trigger a fee."

In either case, he said, "you still should monitor how much you've charged on your card so you don't exceed the credit limit."

4. Be cautious with "no-interest" offers.

Many retailers, such as electronics or furniture stores, promote credit cards with "zero-percent interest" on purchases for a certain amount of time. These cards allow you to buy big-ticket items, perhaps a sofa or a stereo system, without paying interest for anywhere from six months to more than a year. While the chance to avoid interest payments sounds like a terrific deal, keep in mind that if you don't follow the rules for these offers, this "no-interest" special could end up being expensive.

The reason is, with many of these offers, you must pay off the entire purchase by the time the promotional period ends to take advantage of the zero-rate offer. If you don't, the lender will charge you interest from the date you bought the item. You would then have to pay interest -- at the lender's standard rate -- from the date of purchase. And if the Annual Percentage Rate or APR on the retailer's card is higher than what you would pay on another card you have, the extra costs could really add up. The APR is the cost of credit expressed as a yearly rate, including interest and other charges.

5. Keep only the credit cards you really need and then periodically use them all.

Some consumers have too many credit cards. Among the concerns: Those extra cards can lead some people to overspend. Also, having many cards with no existing balance or a very low balance can reduce your credit score because prospective lenders can conclude that you have the potential to use them and get into debt.

For the average person, two or three general-purpose cards are probably enough. Consider canceling and cutting up the rest. However, also remember that closing a credit card account can temporarily lower your credit score, especially if the cancelled card was one you owned and used responsibly for many years.

With the credit cards you do keep, remember to avoid large balances on them in relation to the credit limit. And in the new environment, it also may be beneficial to periodically use all of your cards. Here's why. Even if you pay your card bill in full each month and never pay interest, using your card earns money for the card company because merchants pay a fee each time you use the card. So, consumers who regularly use their cards and repay their debt may be considered valued customers, even if they pay on time and don't pay interest. "Regular purchases promptly paid off may be enough to reduce the risk of a credit line reduction, inactivity fees and other penalties," said Susan Boenau, Chief of the FDIC's Consumer Affairs Section.

6. Do your research before paying high annual fees for a "rewards" card.

Rewards sound great in advertisements for credit cards, but the points formula can be complicated, the rules are subject to change, and the benefits may not be as generous as you think. You should always read the fine print and be realistic about your likely use of the card before you accept an expensive annual fee in return for rewards.

7. Take additional precautions against interest rate increases.

"Although the law puts new limits on interest rate increases, you need to remain vigilant," Manley said. For example, while card companies cannot increase the interest rate on existing balances except in certain circumstances, they may raise rates on extensions of credit for new purchases as long as proper notice is provided.

"If you receive a notice that your interest rate is increasing," Manley said, "determine whether you have another way to make future purchases, such as by waiting until you have saved enough money for the purchase or by using a card with a lower interest rate."

Rate increases also may come in another form. For example, some fixed-rate cards may be converted to variable-rate cards after a notice has been sent to cardholders. This would result in variable rates being applied to new balances.

Also note that a credit card company can increase the rate on an existing balance if the consumer fails to send the minimum payment within 60 days of the due date. So, it's very important to avoid being more than 60 days late on a credit card. If you miss a due date, you can avoid a "penalty" interest rate on that existing balance by getting your payment in within 60 days.

And if you're more than 60 days late and that does trigger a rate increase, get current on your credit card payments as soon as possible and then start consistently paying on time. Card issuers are required to reduce the penalty rate if they receive prompt payments for six months.

In general, what else can you do to get the best rates? Keep in mind that a credit score is built up over long periods, not just over one or two years, so make all your loan payments on time. Even if you have past blemishes, you can improve your credit score over time by managing your credit well. Be aware that if you can only afford to pay the minimum amount due, you probably won't get the best rates. But if you can pay more than the minimum each month -- as much more as possible -- that will work in your favor.

Also, carefully read the terms of a new credit card before using it. If the card has a high interest rate or fees, shop around for a better offer.

8. Parents of young adults have a new opportunity to teach responsible management of credit cards.

The new law includes protections for young consumers, including a requirement that anyone under 21 who wants to obtain a credit card must have a qualified co-signer on the account or must prove he or she alone can repay any debt. This is intended to protect young people from getting overwhelmed by credit card debt. But it also offers an opportunity for parents to teach their kids about responsible use of credit cards.

"Parents should have discussions with their children about how credit cards should be used and repaid," said Reynolds. "They may even want to make sure their kids have taken a financial education course before they have access to a credit card."

If you're considering co-signing for a credit card with a young adult, it's best to have an understanding that you will get early notice of any troubles, including late payments, so you can keep on top of the credit card and work out problems with the lender before your own credit record is damaged.

"One way or another," Reynolds added, "parents should make clear their expectation to their child -- the cardholder -- that the child will pay the credit card bill on time, and that the child keeps this fact in mind when using the card."

And what if, despite your best planning, your child (or any other co-signer for a credit card or loan) can't or won't make the payments? As a co-signer, you are obligated to pay the debt to the lender, and not doing so can damage your own credit score.

Here are eight ways to avoid potential pitfalls in the new world of credit cards....

FTC Settlement Reins in New York-based Prepaid Calling Card Distributor

May 20, 2010

The Federal Trade Commission reached its third settlement as part of a recent agency crackdown on fraud in the prepaid calling card industry that has forced companies to pay more than $4 million.

The latest agreement requires New York-based Diamond Phone Card, Inc. and its principals to pay $500,000. It also bars them from misleading consumers about the talk time that their calling cards provide, and requires them to clearly disclose in the same language that they are marketed all fees associated with their cards.

The FTCs July 2009 complaint against Diamond Phone Card like the FTCs complaints against other calling card companies alleged that the company made false claims about the number of calling minutes their cards deliver, and that it failed to properly disclose maintenance and other hidden fees. Some fees were disclosed in nearly illegible print on the bottom of the companys advertisements. The FTCs testing showed that consumers received only about half the advertised minutes from Diamond prepaid calling cards.

Unlike Diamond Phones ads, the FTCs message here is clear, said FTC Chairman Jon Leibowitz. If you deceive consumers about the prepaid calling cards youre selling, we will take you to court and force you to give up the money you made through deceptive sales tactics.

The complaint named the company and its principals, Nasreen Gilani, Samsuddin Panjawani, and Faiez Farishta. The FTC alleged that they marketed calling cards to recent immigrants for calls to a wide range of international locations, including the Dominican Republic, El Salvador, Mexico, India, Pakistan, and Guatemala.

The FTC has established a joint federal-state task force in 2007 to deal with deceptive marketing practices in the prepaid calling card industry. The task force also includes representatives from the Federal Communications Commission and more than 35 states. The settlement has been filed with the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York.

In approving the settlement, Commissioners Edith Ramirez and Julie Brill urged Congress to expand the FTCs authority to take action and seek fines against telecommunications carriers and distributors that engage in unlawful conduct by deceptively marketing prepaid calling cards.

For immigrants from Latin America, Africa, Asia and elsewhere around the world, American military families, and other consumers, prepaid calling cards can serve as a critical lifeline to friends and family, Commissioners Ramirez and Brill said. Noting the widespread deceptive practices in the marketing of these cards, the Commissioners said, "the time has come to give the FTC more powerful tools to tackle fraud in the prepaid calling card industry.

FTC Settlement Reins in New York-based Prepaid Calling Card Distributor...

New Law Helps Credit Card Holders Pay Down Balance Faster

By James Limbach
ConsumerAffairs.com

May 10. 2010
Credit card borrowers who pay more than the minimum payment each month can reap big savings under the Credit Card Accountability, Responsibility and Disclosure (CARD) Act of 2009, a Center for Responsible Lending (CRL) analysis finds.

Under the new law, borrowers can pay down existing credit card debt sooner by paying less interest than under the old rules, all the while improving their credit score. The CRL analysis estimates that for each dollar above the minimum that a customer pays, he or she may save two dollars in interest.

Interest rates have been a sore point with credit card holders.

"In February 2010 I paid $20.00 less than the full balance on my credit card. This resulted in an 'interest' charge of $49.14 on my next statement," says Jerry of Brenham, TX. He tells ConsumerAffairs.com that the complete balance on that statement was paid in full and on time including the $49.14 charge. The following month another "interest" charge of 33.47 was added to the balance. "When I spoke with the customer service rep, he explained that the balance shown on my statement was not the amount the bank claimed was owed. And even if I paid the new balance due, there would be additional 'interest' charges added to my next bill, because I would have not paid the secret amount the bank wanted me to pay."

This kind of thing, Jerry claims, "constitutes a deceptive trade practice. How can I guess the true balance due if the bank sends a false bill and then claims a failure to pay some concealed amount?"

"We want Americans to know that the new law's changes to credit card practices can work for them," says Joshua Frank, CRL's senior researcher on the credit card industry. "We urge credit card customers to make the most of this new law by paying as much as possible above the minimum."

While paying more than the minimum has always been a good idea, the new law allows the strategy to earn even greater benefits. Under the law, any amount that customers pay above the required minimum must be applied to the balance in their credit card account carrying the highest interest rate. That's the opposite of what credit card issuers had been doing for years, when they applied payments to the lowest-rate balances first -- maximizing interest charges.

The technique worked for credit card issuers because most people were unaware of the practice and, even if they knew, could have done little about it. Frank says the new law puts borrowers in the driver's seat. But, he cautions, to benefit they have to take control and pay more than the minimum.

The CRL analysis, "Capitalizing on New Consumer Protections: Four Tips to Rid Yourself of Credit Card Debt Sooner and Save Money," advises credit card holders to:

• Pay more than the minimum amount due each month.

• Watch out for hair-trigger interest rate hikes. While rates on existing balances can be raised only if a borrower falls behind by two months, the new law still allows issuers to raise rates on new purchases or cash advances for any reason.

• Decline offers to opt-in for over-the-credit-limit coverage because this lets the issuer extend additional credit at exorbitant cost.

• Avoid credit cards requiring grievances be settled through mandatory arbitration rather than in the courts. CRL research has found mandatory arbitration favors issuers over consumers

For its new analysis, CRL studied several scenarios with different types of balances and interest rates. One that is common in the market featured a borrower whose credit card had one balance for purchases and another balance for cash advances, which carry a higher interest rate. By paying an extra $100 above the minimum in one month, this borrower saved $224 in interest expenses over the life of the loan.

New Law Helps Credit Card Holders Pay Down Balance Faster...

Conn. Attorney General Wants Credit Card Rates Rolled Back

When Congress passed credit card reform in May 2009, it didn't implement the new rules until February 2010. Most credit card companies took advantage of that lag time to jack up interest rates.

Since then complaints have poured into ConsumerAffairs.com from consumers who said they thought they were doing everything right, only to be blindsided by their credit card company.

"I always paid on time and paid more then the minimum payment," Dennis, of Caldwell, Idaho, told ConsumerAffairs.com. And to my surprise, since I had not charged anything in over a year, they closed my account and boosted my interest rate to 29.99 percent, which caused my payments to go up."

Connecticut Attorney General Richard Blumenthal thinks rate hikes like these should be rolled back. In a letter to Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke, Blumenthal said the Fed's draft credit card rules are "woefully inadequate" and said he would like to see changes to compel rollback of recent massive interest rate increases on creditworthy consumers.

Blumenthal said card issuers should reverse all arbitrary rate increases since January 1, 2009, for creditworthy consumers.

"Once again, the Federal Reserve Board has chosen to protect the interests of Wall Street bankers at the expense of Main Street consumers -- putting concerns for bank 'safety and soundness' ahead of consumer protection," Blumenthal wrote. "The board's apparent favoritism of banks mocks the clear Congressional intent evidenced in the CARD Act to protect consumers from the abuses of credit card issuers and underscores the need for a strong, independent Consumer Financial Protection Agency that puts consumers first."

Blumenthal says the Fed should have opposed interest rate increases that credit card issuers imposed on consumers -- even some of their best customers who fully honored their credit card agreements -- before the CARD Act's effective date.

'Violates CARD Act's fundamental purpose'

"Indeed, the proposed regulations do not actually require interest rate reductions regardless of how unjustified the increase," Blumenthal wrote. "The board's failure to require interest rate reductions in these circumstances violates the CARD Act's fundamental purpose of protecting consumers from bank practices that take advantage of and gouge consumers."

Blumenthal says card issuers used the interim between passage of the CARD act and its implementation to jack up rates to as high as 30 percent on consumers, many of whom never missed a payment. Blumenthal said he has written the Fed three times since December noting that the CARD Act compels issuers to roll back arbitrary increases during the interim and urging the Fed to write rules compelling decreases.

Blumenthal said the Fed's draft rules fail to compel rollbacks by letting issuers set their own standards for interest rate reviews required by the law.

"The board's complete lack of regulatory guidance leaves banks free to perform perfunctory reviews, manipulate amorphous factors to justify rate increases, switch to different factors during the review from those used to increase rates, and otherwise deny appropriate rate reductions -- even where such reviews show a clear decline in consumer credit risk," Blumenthal said in his letter. "Under the board's proposed rules, banks are literally free to look at any factors they choose and to write their own 'policies and procedures' for doing the required reviews without any guidance from the board to ensure that the methodologies used are reasonable.

Blumenthal also took issue with the Fed for creating what he called "a gaping loophole" by exempting penalty interest rate charges from the law's requirement that all penalty fees and charges be "reasonable and proportional."

The attorney general said the Fed should establish "safe harbors" -- maximum amounts -- for penalty fees.

"In setting these 'safe harbor' limits, the board should look to the far lower amounts that community banks and credit unions currently impose -- compared to those of large banks -- as strong indicators of the maximum amounts necessary to deter cardholder misconduct and recover bank costs incurred as a result of such misconduct," he said.

Conn. Attorney General Wants Credit Card Rates Rolled Back...

Vermont Retailers May Get to Set Minimum Credit Purchases

The Vermont State Senate approved a bill this week that would allow retailers in the state to set minimum purchases for consumers using credit and debit cards. Merchants would be free to set their own minimum, under the proposed legislation.

Businesses have pressed lawmakers for that authority because they say interchange, or "swipe" fees charged by card networks wipe out their profit margins on small purchases. Credit card networks charge retailers a fee every time a consumer uses plastic to make a purchase.

Perhaps nowhere is the classic confrontation between Wall Street and Main Street more pronounced than the conflict over interchange fees. Merchants hate them. Banks depend on them. The consumer, of course, usually ends up paying them.

The Vermont bill was modified from its original version, which would have allowed businesses to refuse to accept certain types of cards. For example, cards with generous rewards programs for consumers sometimes charge the retailer a higher swipe fee.

That provision was removed in an effort to secure passage by the Vermont Senate and improve prospects in the House. Should the measure pass the House, it must be signed by the governor in order to become law.

While Vermont is considering the limit on purchases, Congress could pick up the issue on a national level, as part of financial reform. Retail merchant associations in Washington are lobbying to eliminate or reduce interchange fees and have begun urging their members to start bringing the issue up with consumers. Some of them are.

Speedway convenience stores have started informing customers of the costs associated with using plastic. The National Association of Convenience Stores says nearly two percent of every transaction goes from local stores to big banks. In 2008, the group says, swipe fees totaled $48 billion and were storeowners' second highest cost.

Cash discount

The convenience store operators say they want consumers to know that when they fill up their cars with gas, part of the price they are paying goes for swipe fees, if they are using a credit or debit card. So some stations in upstate New York have begun offering a discount for gas if motorists pay with cash.

Sometimes the discounts can be as much as five cents a gallon, knocking a dollar off a typical fill-up.

Credit card networks, naturally, have a different view of interchange fees.

"Interchange is a small fee paid by a merchant's bank, also known as the acquiring bank, to the cardholder's bank to compensate the issuing bank for a portion of the risks and costs it incurs," MasterCard says on its Web site.

"For years, merchants have pursued legislation and legal action aimed at lowering or eliminating their costs of accepting electronic payments -- claiming this is to protect their customers who would see lower prices as a result," Anthony Walker, CEO of NARFE Premier Federal Credit Union, wrote in an American Banker op-ed last fall. "But what it's really about is protecting their profits and shifting costs to the general consumer."

Walker and other bankers say merchants receive huge benefits from accepting credit and debit cards and that two cents on the dollar is a small price to pay to "outsource their credit risk to financial institutions who are left holding the bag if the customer doesn't pay their bill."



Vermont Retailers May Get to Set Minimum Credit Purchases...

Video - 5 Things You Should Know About Credit Cards

There are new rules in place for credit card companies and, in the long run, consumers stand to benefit. But it just makes sense that credit card customers need to understand the most important rule changes contained in the CARD Act and what their impact will be. Here then, are the "5 Things You Need to Know About Credit Cards."



Video - 5 Things You Should Know About Credit Cards...

FTC Bans Credit Card Marketer From Telemarketing

One call consumers won't be getting in the future is one pitching all manner of credit products from marketer James Nicholson. The telemarketing ban is part of a settlement with the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), which has labeled Nicholson's operation a scam.

The FTC sued Nicholson and his companies last year, alleging he tricked consumers into paying hundreds of dollars for a credit card that could be used only to buy merchandise from his companies' Web sites. The charges also include those related to an advance-fee credit card scam and a bogus advance-fee interest-rate reduction/debt negotiation program, as well as allegations that they debited consumer bank accounts without permission, failed to tell consumers they would not be able to get a refund, and illegally called consumers whose names were on the National Do Not Call Registry.

Under the settlement order, Nicholson and his companies will pay more than $200,000.

The FTC filed a complaint in 2009 charging Nicholson and several of his businesses with using deceptive telemarketing pitches since 2006 to offer consumers with poor or no credit a general-use credit card in exchange for an up-front fee of as much as $250. Telemarketers working for Nicholson's chief company, Group One Network, also claimed that consumers would get access to a significant line of credit that could be used for cash advances, and that their payment histories would be reported to the three major credit bureaus.

Not what it appeared

In reality, consumers who paid the fee received an online shopping card they could use only to buy products from Group One's Web sites, they could not get cash advances, and their credit histories were never reported to the credit bureaus.

In April 2009, the FTC filed an amended complaint naming four more companies and adding new allegations relating to the deceptive telemarketing of a bogus advance-fee interest-rate reduction/debt negotiation program by a business operating as Credit First Financial Solutions. The FTC's amended complaint alleged that Nicholson's telemarketers, among other things, falsely represented that in exchange for an up-front fee, they could lower consumers' interest rates by negotiating with consumers' creditors; would provide consumers a minimum savings of $1,500 to $20,000 within the first 30 days of their enrollment; and would provide a full refund if they failed to achieve the promised savings.

The settlement bans Nicholson, a repeat offender who pleaded guilty to wire fraud in connection with fraudulent telemarketing in 1995, from telemarketing and from selling advance-fee loans or credit cards. It also bans him from assisting anyone in telemarketing or marketing such loans. Furthermore, the settlement prohibits Nicholson and his companies from misleading consumers about credit-related goods or services, or any other goods or services they market.

$17.2 million judgment

Finally, the order imposes a $17.2 million judgment against all the defendants, which has been suspended based on their inability to pay the full amount. However, Nicholson will turn over a 31-foot power boat, his Nissan Pathfinder, and jewelry and art valued at more than $10,000. The other defendants will turn over more than $200,000 in cash and other assets.

The settlement resolves the FTC's charges against: Group One Networks, Inc., doing business as (d/b/a) Credit Line Gold Card, The USA Workers, TheUSAWork.com, and TheUSAWorkers.com; US Gold Line, LLC, d/b/a USGoldLine.com, Gainsway Credit, and GainswayCredit.com; My Online Credit Store, LLC d/b/a MyOnlineCreditStore.com, MYOnlinecr.com, Diamond Executive, NewECredit, and NewECredit.com; James Nicholson, individually and as president of Group One Networks, Inc., and manager of US Gold Line, LLC and My Online Credit Store, LLC; Credit First Financial Solution, LLC; Group One Administrative, Inc.; Tall Pines Administrative Services, LLC; and Sun Coast Data Services, LLC.

Brett Fisher, the chief executive officer of Group One Networks, Inc., and manager of US Gold Line, LLC and My Online Credit Store, LLC, settled similar FTC charges in December 2009. He agreed to a court order banning him from selling advance-fee credit cards and from violating the Telemarketing Sales Rule. The order against Fisher also imposed a $17.2 million judgment, which was suspended based on his inability to pay. He has turned over $21,000 in cash to the FTC.

FTC Bans Credit Card Marketer From Telemarketing: One call consumers won't be getting in the future is one pitching all manner of credit products from mark...

CARD Act Could Impact Your Credit Score

By now you've probably received a mailing from your credit card company informing you about the changes to your account.

Some of these changes are mandated by the new Credit Card Accountability and Disclosure (CARD) Act. Others aren't, and these are the ones you need to worry about.

Changes required by the CARD act are mostly positive for consumers, but have the result of cutting into lenders' profits. Lenders are trying to make up for those lost profits by implementing changes that will increase the number of fees consumers pay.

For example, some consumers have already received word from their credit card companies that they will have to pay an annual fee for the privilege of carrying the card. Once upon a time, annual fees were commonplace, but were phased out as the industry got more competitive. Unless you read the notice of this new fee, more than likely it took you by surprise.

"I was charged a $39 annual fee this year which I have never been charged since I received the card," Jeanne, a Capital One customer from Las Vegas, told ConsumerAffairs.com. "When I received my on-line statement there was $41.17 due. Explanation was there was $2.17 charged for interest on the balance for three days or whatever. I really don't understand but was told I had to pay fee and interest."

Non-activity fee

If you have a card that you rarely use, you may find that you will be assessed a "non-activity" fee, or the account may be closed unilaterally. Should that happen, it would have a negative impact on your credit score for two reasons; an account closed by the lender and a drop in your available credit.

The Federal Reserve has proposed a new rule that would prevent credit card holders from imposing an inactivity fee, as well as fees for declined transactions and multiple penalties. If approved, those changes would take effect in August.

Credit card companies may also continue the practice of unilaterally lowering customers' credit limits. They are doing this to reduce the overall amount of credit they are extending, since they must maintain sufficient capital reserves. At the same time, the credit card default rate remains high, so lenders are aggressively trying to limit their risk.

But when a credit card company lowers your credit line, it has a negative affect on your credit score. You have less credit available to you and, if you carry balances on your cards, the ratio of debt to available credit rises sharply. And, like Stacey of Otsego, Minn., you could find yourself in a Catch-22.

Catch-22

"Chase has arbitrarily lowered our credit line three times now, each time saying that it is because we are using to large a percentage of our credit line," Stacey told ConsumerAffairs.com. But we are not using the card! The percentage goes up because they are reducing the line."

If your cards are already close to be maxed out, the credit score damage is less than if you have little debt and lots of available credit, according to Sarah Davis, senior vice president at VantageScores, a credit data firm.

So, how should you respond to these changes? Some fed-up consumers might close their accounts, but even that action might have a negative impact on a credit score. Even when you close an account on your own, you are reducing your total amount of available credit.

"If a consumer must close an account, closing the oldest account is the least favorable option because the longer a line of credit is open, the more history a consumer has accumulated," Davis said.

Instead of closing an account, make one or two small purchases on a regular basis and pay the balance off quickly.

Although it views the Credit CARD Act of 2009 as a major win for borrowers, the Center for Responsible Lending warns credit card companies still keep you guessing by finding new ways to make money. Even with federal legislation in place, CRL says card issuers can continue to:

  • Saddle you with other, often hard-to-understand charges, such as fees to get a paper statement, for purchases abroad, for having a zero balance or "account management fees" (at least one large bank has done this -- in the amount of $19 per year -- since passage of the Credit CARD Act).

  • Close your account or reduce your credit limit without notice for any reason. Contact your card company if this happens to you. Under the new law they must wait 45 days before they can tack on an over-the-limit fee or a penalty rate on a newly lowered credit limit.

  • Arbitrarily change any or all terms for credit cards issued to small businesses.

  • 9 Raise your interest rate without limit on future purchases as long as they give 45 days notice. If you don't want the higher rate, you have the right to close the account and pay it off over five years.

  • 9 Increase your minimum monthly payments, as a percentage of total balance. A major issuer made headlines in the fall of 2009 for doing this.

  • Prevent cardholders from bringing disputes before a jury in court, a practice known as mandatory or forced arbitration.

  • Charge whatever fee or interest rate they want.

And if it's not clear by now, consumers should realize that every communication they receive from their credit card company is important. It may contain changes to your account that can be costly if you are unaware of them.

CARD Act Could Impact Your Credit Score...

New Credit Card Protections Can Help Level Mountain of Debt


With most of the provisions of the Credit Card Accountability, Responsibility and Disclosure Act of 2009 (CARD Act) now in effect, consumers are protected from universal default clauses, double-cycle billing and inequitable application of monthly payments to balances.

What those with heavy credit card debt need to do now, according to the Association of Independent Consumer Credit Counseling Agencies (AICCCA), is take advantage of the CARD Act protections and pay off those high credit card balances.

"The CARD Act is a great incentive for consumers to pay down credit card debt," said Dave Jones, AICCCA president. "Monthly payments will be applied more equitably and interest rates should remain more consistent, which will allow consumers to pay less in interest charges and more toward paying down principle balances."

AICCCA offers these four tips for wise credit use now that the CARD Act is law:

• 1. Stop using credit to extend your income. Decrease your spending or increase your income to begin living within your means. Adding to your credit balances every month is a vicious cycle that is difficult to break, but it is essential for financial well being to do so.

• 2. Pay down existing card balances quickly. Take advantage of the new provisions of the CARD Act and make a concerted effort to get your balances paid. If you have any cash-advance balances with high interest rates, your payment will be applied to that portion of your balance first, saving you money in interest charges.

• 3. Read all your mail from card issuers. Card issuers may make changes to existing cardholder agreements after the CARD Act goes into effect. Watch for changes to your current cardholder agreement including initiation of an annual fee, a change from a fixed-rate to a variable rate interest rate and/or new fees for an inactive account or to receive a paper statement.

• 4. Opt out of any changes you don't want. You can opt out of any proposed changes to your current cardholder agreement. Your account will be closed and you can pay off any balance under the original cardholder terms.

While the CARD Act does help level the playing field to a certain extent, it is important for consumers to know what it will and will not do.

New Credit Card Protections Can Help Level Mountain of Debt...

Consumer Groups Keep Up Pressure For New Consumer Agency

By Mark Huffman
ConsumerAffairs.com

February 25, 2010
It's a new day for credit card holders. A new law took effect this week giving card-holders new rights and reining in some of the industry's more abusive practices.

Yet consumers should expect their lender to try and recoup some lost avenues of revenue in other ways, in the form of new fees. As Congress wrangles over financial reform, consumer groups say a Consumer Financial Protection Agency, one of the more controversial parts of the current bill, is needed more than ever.

"The lesson of the CARD Act is clear: we need a Consumer Financial Protection Agency," said Heather McGhee, Director of the policy group Demos' Washington Office. "Banks have already found new ways to abuse consumers, and Congress can't meet every year to legislate against the newest credit card outrage."

McGhee said new credit card outrages include 79 percent interest rates and enormous establishment fees on so called "subprime" credit cards; hidden costs on pre-paid cards, and the marketing of specialty cards to cover medical costs.

"These kind of practices will continue until there is one agency charged with ensuring the safety of financial products used by American families and small business," she said.

Even so, it appears that Congressional leaders are placing the CFPA on the back burner in order to advance financial reform legislation in the Senate. Last week Sen. Chris Dodd (D-CT), Chairman of the Senate Banking Committee, agreed to suspend consideration of the CFPA until the end of negotiations, in order to win the support of Sen. Bob Corker (R-TN).

AGs support CFPA

Though Senate Republicans oppose the stand alone consumer protection agency, it enjoys bipartisan support among the various state attorneys general. Last October, a number of attorneys general signed a statement urging Congress to approve CFPA.

"Risky lending practices and a free-for-all in the financial services industry helped cause our current economic problems," said North Carolina Attorney General Roy Cooper at the time the statement was issued. "Smarter regulation and stronger enforcement, from federal and state authorities, are clearly needed to protect individual consumers and our entire economy."

Why would state officials be in favor of the agency? Cooper noted that strong North Carolina laws against predatory lending prevented a foreclosure problem in the Tar Heel state until federal regulators "pre-empted" those laws, allowing national banks to engage in subprime lending.

"Creation of a federal CFPA will be an important step toward a safer and sounder financial marketplace," he said.

The proposal would give state regulators, including state attorneys general, the authority to enforce their state consumer protection laws against federally-chartered institutions.



Consumer Groups Keep Up Pressure For New Consumer Agency...

Consumers: Know Your New Credit Card Rights


With many once-commonplace unfair credit card practices becoming illegal as of today, it's important for consumers to be aware of their new rights.

"The new law is a pretty big step forward for consumers in leveling the playing field against credit card companies," Ohio Attorney General Richard Cordray said. "The provisions offer new protections that will eliminate many of the sneaky, one-sided practices that made credit card transactions so confusing and unfair to consumers."

Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner calls the new law "a critical step forward in our effort to protect American families by prohibiting the use of unfair retroactive rate hikes and late fee and over-limit fee traps by credit card companies." But, he said, there is more to be done.

"As we work with Congress on broader reform to make our financial system safer and more stable, we are also working to consolidate the fragmented authority of seven separate agencies into a single, independent and accountable Consumer Financial Protection Agency," Geithner said.

The Credit Card Accountability Responsibility and Disclosure (CARD) Act of 2009:

Prohibits unfair rate increases: In general, credit card providers can no longer increase interest rates within the first year after a consumer opens a new account. They also cannot increase the rate on an existing credit card balance. Since August 2009, credit card providers have been required to give consumers a 45-day notice before increasing interest rates.

Bans universal default: Using a practice called universal default, credit card providers could increase a consumer's credit card interest rate if the consumer was delinquent on other payments, such as a cell phone or utility bill. The new rules prohibit this practice.

Restricts over-the-limit fees: Credit card companies must obtain approval from the consumer before allowing the consumer to charge more than the card's limit and subsequently issuing an over-the-limit fee.

Requires a co-signer for most consumers under 21 years old: Credit card providers cannot issue credit cards to consumers under 21 years old unless the consumer demonstrates the ability to pay or has a co-signer, such as a parent, guardian or spouse.

Requires fair payment allocation: Credit card providers can impose interest charges only on balances in the current billing cycle, eliminating a practice known as "double billing," which generally affects individuals who pay off their balance every month. They also cannot allocate payments in order to maximize the interest a consumer must pay.

Problems not over

The new law doesn't necessarily mean consumers' credit card problems are over. The Center for Responsible Lending (CRL) notes that many issuers are finding ways to "dodge the reforms."

According to CRL, some are:

adopting schemes to game interest rates, with the little known "pick-a-rate" practice gaining increasing momentum. Pick-a-rate costs U.S. consumers $720 million per year and it may reach $2.5 billion annually as the practice spreads;

shifting penalty fee structures to charge nine out of ten people the highest fee possible if they pay late, while projecting the appearance of lower fees. The average late fee today is $39, while the typical past-due amount is about $50; and

padding their miscellaneous fees since the announcement of new Federal Reserve rules and passage of the Credit CARD Act, disguising many of the charges.

While acknowledging that the CARD Act is a good thing, Brad Stroh, co-founder and CEO of Bills.com, acknowledges that "for many consumers it will likely mean more headaches in managing their credit card account, and at the end of the day these changes could actually lead to higher fees or reduced lines of credit."

The best way to avoid these fees, reductions in credit, or elimination of accounts, he says, is to carefully monitor communications with a credit card provider and understand the implications of their changes as well as your actions. This means taking the time to read mailings and speak with representatives when appropriate.

"The days of tossing letters from your credit card company into the trash are over," says Stroh. "These mailings will likely contain valuable information and offers that will demand your attention."

Management tips

Stroh offers these credit card management tips:

Maintain prompt payment status with your credit card company. Demonstrating that you can responsibly meet your current credit obligations is the number one behavior that will impact your standing with the credit card company and your credit score. By missing or being late on a payment you will incur fees, potentially increase your interest rate, and lower your overall credit score.

Pay down high balances to improve credit card utilization. This will show that you can responsibly manage your credit limit, minimizing the chance of higher tiers of interest rates or reductions in credit limit. Additionally, better credit utilization will help boost your credit score.

Maintain activity on your credit card accounts. By using the revolving credit lines that you need or want to keep and promptly paying on them, you can help avoid cancellation of those credit card accounts. Additionally, some credit card companies are introducing inactivity fees. This behavior will avoid those fees and help boost your credit score, while having a long existing credit line closed could lower your score.

Avoid fees through responsible spending habits. Credit card providers will likely look to recoup revenue by charging fees for extra services. New regulations prohibit over limit provisions unless consumers opt-in to the service. Card providers could then charge consumers for this right. By remaining aware of credit limits and balances, consumers can avoid a need for these fees altogether.

Remember, new regulations do not apply to corporate or small business cards. This means some small business owners might consider using personal cards for business expenses because of fee and rate limitations. However, these owners should remain cautious because their personal credit scores could suffer in the event of missed payments or defaults.

"It is important to remember that these new regulations do not limit interest rates, they only make the communication with consumers more transparent," Stroh concludes. "The best approach then to these changes is to be proactive and adjust personal behavior to avoid negative implications."

Not everyone is happy with the way the CARD Act is being implemented. Consumer activists are critical of the pace of the Act's implementation. What do you think about it? Let us know.

Consumers: Know Your New Credit Card Rights...

New Credit Card Rules Take Effect Feb. 22

By Mark Huffman
ConsumerAffairs.com

February 1, 2010
By now you have probably received a notice from your credit card company outlining the changes to your account that will occur later this month, when the Credit Card Accountability and Disclosure Act finally goes into effect.

The law was changed in response to years of consumer complaints about abusive behavior by credit card companies. When the new law goes into effect on February 22, there will be several principal changes:

Payment crediting

Under the new law, if you pay more than the minimum monthly payment, the excess will be applied to balances with the higher interest rate. Currently, the credit card companies can apply it any way they choose, and usually choose to apply it to the balance with the lowest interest. The purpose of this particular change is to allow consumers to pay off their higher balances more quickly, saving on interest charges.

Paying interest

You will have a minimum of 21 days following the close of each billing cycle to pay off the balance to avoid accruing periodic interest charges. Cash advances, however, may still carry an interest charge, even if you pay it back within 21 days. The 21 day window was added because many consumers complained there was so little time between the time they received their monthly statement and when the payment was due.

Rate changes

Under the new rules, rate increases can be made on new balances with a 45-day notice. However, rates on existing credit card balances cannot be changed except under special conditions. This change is designed to end the practice of credit card companies raising customers rates on a whim.

Penalty APR

A penalty APR, also known as drastically raising your interest rate, can still be applied to your account, but only if you fail to may a minimum payment on time, make a payment in which the check bounces, or are late or exceed your credit limit on another account or loan you have with that particular credit card company, or any of its related companies. This provision does away with something called "universal default," which meant a credit card company could jack up your rate if you were late paying any bill, such as your electric bill.

Other changes include:

• No interest rate increases, in most cases, for the first year that any account is open.

• Your payment will be due on the same date each month, and if the date is a Sunday, it could be received by Monday and not draw a late fee

• In most cases credit card companies may not raise the rate on existing balances, just new charges.

• Your statement will provide a toll-free number for a reputable credit counseling agency.

In addition, credit card company communications to customers will become simpler and easier to understand. One prominent change to statements is the requirement that consumers be provided with an illustration of how long it will take them to pay off their balance, illustrating paying only the minimum amount due each month versus paying off the debt in three years. There will be other changes to statements as well.

"This includes removing the Arbitration section from the agreement effective February 22, 2010," Chase said in a letter to customers.

But Chase also emphasized that nothing in the new rules "change the interest rates and fees on your account."

And therein lies for rub for millions of credit card customers. Since Congress passed the CARD action last May, credit card companies have been busy jacking up rates, closing accounts, lowering credit limits, raising minimum monthly payments and adding new fees. In short, doing many of the things they will no longer be allowed to do after February 22.

Consumers complained so loudly that some in Congress proposed passing another law, speeding up implementation of the CARD act to early December. But the measure died when early December came and went without the measure getting out of committee.

Rep. Carolyn Maloney (D-NY), author of the CARD Act, charged lenders were taking advantage of the eight month window between passage of the law and its implementation to continue to abuse consumers. In late October 2009, a report by the Pew Health Group's Safe Credit Cards Project tended to confirm her suspicions.

The October report found that 100 percent of credit cards offered online by the leading bank card issuers continued to include practices that will be outlawed once legislation passed in May takes effect next year.

The report also found that advertised credit card interest rates rose an average of 20 percent in the first two quarters of 2009, even as banks' cost of lending declined.

"Since passage of the Credit CARD Act, we found that credit card issuers have done little to remove practices deemed unfair or deceptive by the Federal Reserve," said Shelley A. Hearne, managing director of the Pew Health Group, which oversees the project. "In fact, some of the most harmful practices have actually grown more widespread-not one of the bank cards reviewed would meet the legal requirements outlined in the Credit CARD Act, which is bad news for consumers."



New Credit Card Rules Take Effect Feb. 22...

Bill Me Later Charges Illegal Interest Rates


It sounds like a great idea, especially during a prolonged recession: a company that offers instant credit to cash-strapped consumers. That's the idea behind Bill Me Later, a website that lets consumers complete online transactions using only their birth date and the last four digits of their social security number.

But, as with most gimmicks, Bill Me Later comes with a catch and a pretty big one at that. According to a class action filed on Monday, Bill Me Later charges sky-high interest rates and late fees, a practice that violates California consumer protection laws.

California usury laws those that govern interest rates prevent non-bank entities from charging rates above 10 percent. Bill Me Later tried to get around these regulations by enlisting CIT Bank to provide banking services for its transactions. But according to the suit, Bill Me Later is the one pulling all the strings; it alone interacts with customers, provides and accepts loan applications, decides whether or not to approve loans, and services customer accounts. Simply put, Bill Me Later in effect 'rents' CIT Bank's name and its bank charter as a scam, for the sole purpose of evading California law and collecting exorbitant interest rates.

And exorbitant may be putting it mildly. According to Jeff Friedman, the case's lead attorney, nearly all of the company's loans carry an interest rate over 10 percent, and many exceed 100 percent. One consumer quoted in the complaint incurred an eye-popping 116.67 percent.

Lead plaintiff Kyle Sawyer, of Torrance, California, used Bill Me Later to finance a $1,068.08 computer purchase from Cyberpower in October 2008. Sawyer started out with a 19.99 percent interest rate, but was subsequently charged several late fees of $39.99 each. According to the complaint, if one were to compute the assessed late penalty fee as an annual percentage rate, [Sawyer] has been charged at more than a 70% annual interest rate during his monthly billing cycles.

Consumers stand to lose more than money. Friedman, of Hans Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP, pointed out that simply clicking on the Bill Me Later button when completing a transaction can adversely affect a consumer's credit rating. He said the extent of credit-related damage will become clearer during discovery.

Further, Bill Me Later, which eBay bought for $945 million in 2008, has been working behind the scenes to integrate its service into other well-known websites. PayPal, for example, now offers consumers the option to you guessed it Bill Me Later, which subjects them to the same interest rates and late fees as consumers who sign up directly on the company's website. Sandra of Evergreen, Co., who wrote to Consumer Affairs in June, and who is quoted in the plaintiffs' complaint, was lured into Bill Me Later via Blue Mountain e-Cards:

"Using Blue Mountain e-cards online I seem to have invoked billing by BillMeLater. I thought their US Mail communications were junk mail. I called today and paid the base amount that would have been due, 15.99, for Blue Mountain Cards. However, between March 18 and June 17 they tacked on another 25 in fees, more than I initial owed Blue Mountain Cards. There is a place on this statement in front of me that says their ANNUAL PERCENTAGE RATE for this billing cycle is 104.39% No one, for anything, should charge an APR 104.39%. Further, adding on late fees in excess of the original debt is absurd."

CitiBank veterans

The plaintiffs point out that Bill Me Later's executive team comes with deep roots in the credit card lending industry. CEO Gary Marino worked at Citibank for 15 years, and subsequently managed the credit and marketing operations for First USA. According to the complaint, Marino secured $100 million in venture capital to develop Bill Me Later's complex and proprietary lending model when he founded the company in 2000.

According to Friedman, Bill Me Later is just the latest version of the centuries-old practice of usury, defined as charging illegal or unconscionable interest rates. Just as payday loans those that provide consumers with a high-interest cash advance until their next paycheck took off in recent years, models like Bill Me will likely pop up with more regularity in coming years.

The complaint alleges breach of contract and violation of California consumer protection laws against both Bill Me Later and eBay, and accuses eBay of aiding and abetting. The plaintiffs are seeking damages and an injunction prohibiting Bill Me Later from continuing its illegal practices. California law allows consumers victimized by bad faith practices to collect treble damages, which Friedman confirmed that the class is seeking.



According to a class action filed on Monday, Bill Me Later charges sky-high interest rates and late fees, a practice that violates California consumer prot...

Banks Eye New Fees, Revenue In 2010

By Mark Huffman
ConsumerAffairs.com

January 4, 2010
The Credit Card Act of 2009 takes effect next month, but as consumers are all to aware, lenders spent the second half of last year getting ready for it, jacking up interest rates and closing thousands of accounts.

With the new rules expected to take billions of dollars from banks' bottom lines, industry experts say consumers can expect to face all sorts of new fees in the coming year.

"There are so many things that issuers can do that the Card Act doesn't touch," Bill Hardekopf, chief executive officer of LowCards.com, a Web site that tracks the industry, told the Wall Street Journal.

Hardekopf and other analysts expect banks to get creative this year, coming up with new fees for a batch of products and services. The industry, they say, has become much more reliant in recent years on fees, rather than on interest charges. To earn interest, banks have to loan money.

In the new credit environment, banks are more reluctant to make loans. In some cases, tighter lending standards have reduced the loans they can make.

For consumers, the new credit card rules will limit some interest rate hikes. Under the new law, banks have to give customers ample notice of a rate hike. They will no longer be able to raise rates on existing balances.

Damage Already Done

But for many existing customers, that is of little consolation. Most credit card companies have used the time between the Card Act's passage in May and its implementation date to do many of the things that will be prevented under the law. This did not go unnoticed in Congress.

"The abuses by some in the industry which led Congress to pass my original legislation seem to have only increased since the bill's signing," said Rep. Carolyn Maloney (D-NY) in November. "In fact, The Pew Charitable Trust reports that interest rates have spiked this year by an average of 20 percent on credit cards representing more than 91 percent of the $864 billion in outstanding credit card balances."

ConsumerAffairs.com has received thousands of complaints from credit card customers in the last six months. Christine, of Cheney, Wash., said Chase, in effect, forced her to cancel her credit card account.

"Basically, they upped the interest on my platinum card from 12 percent APR to 24 percent to 28 percent APR for absolutely no reason," she told ConsumerAffairs.com.

Christine said she was surprised at her treatment because she considered herself a good customer who always paid her bill on time. But with default rates rising in a bad economy and new rules set to reduce the amount of fees banks can collect, Chase and other banks took steps last year to reduce their loan portfolios and to make those smaller portfolios pay more. Many good customers ended up paying the price.

Crackdown On Overdraft Fees

Banks stand to take another hit on July 1 of this year when new Federal Reserve rules on bank overdraft fees take effect. Under the new rules, banks will be required to get customers' permission before giving them overdraft "protection" on their ATM withdrawals and debit card purchases.

It will change the present system in which banks automatically cover a customer's purchase when there are insufficient funds, but charge a $35 fee. Many consumers report being overdrawn by less than a dollar, triggering the hefty fee.

While the new rule is a major victory for consumers, it's a major setback for banks. According to Federal Reserve estimates, banks rake in $50 billion a year on overdraft and other service fees. So consumers shouldn't expect banks to suffer this financial setback without reacting.

Some banks and credit card issuers have begun charging fees for services that were once free, such as paper statements. Others have started scaling back their loyalty rewards programs.

Free Checking May Disappear

Free checking accounts could also become a thing of the past. In a 2008 study, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation reported that 75 percent of consumers with checking accounts paid nothing for it.

The other 25 percent, the study showed, paid minimum balance fees, overdraft fees and other service charges that subsidize free checking for the majority. You can expect banks to begin raising the threshold for free checking, so that 75 percent number gets smaller and the 25 percent number gets larger.

Banks are likely to come up with new products and services to offer their customers, all with some sort of fee attached. Tim Smith, CEO of Probity Financial Services, says banking has changed over the years, and the way financial institutions look at fees, is one of the biggest changes.

"In the past banks charged overdraft fees to punish and discourage their customers from overdrawing their accounts," Smith told ConsumerAffairs.com last year. "At some point they realized this was a service they could provide and charge for."

That means consumers should stay alert in their dealings with financial institutions, from their local bank to their credit card companies. When banks offer new services and products, make sure you understand them completely, including their costs, before signing on.

Because in almost every case, there will be a cost.



Banks Eye New Fees, Revenue In 2010...

Visa Pledges Help On Unauthorized Charges

After years of consumer complaints about unauthorized charges on their credit cards by scammers and unscrupulous businesses, Visa says it plans to help.

The company said it is aware of the growing number of abusive "negative option" marketing practices that "sell" consumers products without their consent and that it plans to better publicize the way consumers can fight back.

"Most e-commerce merchants care about their customers and conduct business fairly, but even a few bad actors can cause consumer distrust," said William M. Sheedy, Group President, The Americas, Visa Inc. "We want to let consumers know more about the protections they have against these types of practices and how to pursue a reversal of charges if they've been charged improperly."

Visa's response follows a letter from Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D-WV) asking credit card processors to do a better job of protecting consumers from the negative option, especially when it involves a "free trial." Unauthorized charges topped ConsumerAffairs.com's annual "Top 10 Scams of 2009."

With free trials with a negative option feature, a company takes a consumer's failure to cancel as permission to begin charging. While many merchants use this billing process appropriately, others pre-check consent boxes, bury the details of the offers in the terms and conditions and make cancellations or returns difficult, catching consumers in a cycle of recurring charges for products and services they do not want.

According to a Visa survey, 29 percent of American consumers have fallen victim to deceptive marketing when unscrupulous e-commerce merchants require them to cancel or opt-out of a recurring charge for future products or services.

Visa said it monitors its payment network to identify merchants with excessive levels of cardholder disputes, which may indicate the use of deceptive marketing practices. In fact, merchants who use deceptive marketing practices have up to 20 times as many consumer disputes as the average e-commerce merchant, according to Visa's figures. Visa requires the merchant and its bank to take corrective action to reduce excessive consumer disputes, or risk termination of Visa acceptance privileges.

ConsumerAffairs.com regularly receives thousands of complaints about unauthorized charges. These charges can be for a product, such as a "trial-size" bottle of supplements, or a services, such as a "discount club" membership.

Visa offered these tips to online shoppers on how to spot deceptive free trial offers and deceptive negative option features, and how to deal with unauthorized charges:

• Take time to read and understand all terms and conditions, so a free trial doesn't turn into a costly purchase you didn't intend to make.

• Pay particular attention to any pre-checked boxes before you submit your payment card information for an order. Failing to un-check the boxes may bind you to terms and conditions you're not interested in.

• Review card statements when you get them for any unauthorized charges, and notify the card issuer promptly of any unusual activity or unauthorized charges.

• Try to resolve the situation with the merchant. If you're unsuccessful, contact the card issuer immediately to dispute the charge.

What kind of negative option marketing is acceptable? According to the FTC, it must meet these criteria:

• Disclosing material terms in an understandable manner, without making them unnecessarily long or inconsistent;

• Making the disclosures clear and conspicuous by placing them where consumers are likely to look on Web pages, by labeling disclosures (and links to them) to indicate their importance and relevance, and by using easy-to-read fonts and colors;

• Disclosing the offer's material terms before the consumer incurs a financial obligation;

• Getting consumers' affirmative consent to the offer by, for example, having them click "I Agree" And without relying on pre-checked boxes;

• Not impeding the effective operation of promised cancellation procedures and honoring cancellation requests that comply with such procedures.

If a consumer is charged in any way, other than those listed above, the consumer should contest the charges.



After years of consumer complaints about unauthorized charges on their credit cards by scammers and unscrupulous businesses, Visa says it plans to help....

CRL: Credit Card Issuers Looking For Ways Around Anti-Abuse Rules

By James Limbach
ConsumerAffairs.com

December 11, 2009
Credit card companies don't intend to let little things like Federal Reserve Board rules and a new federal law get in the way of profits.

A new research report from the Center for Responsible Lending (CRL) claims the industry is "crafting new tricks and traps" to get around the new regs in order to continue hitting the nation's 80 million families with one or more credit cards with what CRL calls "arbitrary, unfair interest rate hikes and fees."

The study, "Dodging Reform: As Some Credit Card Abuses Are Outlawed, New Ones Proliferate," examined the practices of issuers that hold over 400 million credit card accounts and found at least eight specific industry practices that flourish despite federal efforts to halt them.

CRL says these practices make it all but impossible for the average person to determine the real cost of credit card debt, and that "the ability and eagerness of credit card issuers to exploit loopholes in the new federal rules underscores why lawmakers need to pass legislation to create the Consumer Financial Protection Agency, as proposed by the White House and now under consideration by Congress."

The eight practices highlighted in the report include the manipulation of interest rates, the padding of miscellaneous fees and a deceptive policy on late-payment fees. Use of these abusive tactics is widespread and growing, the report finds.

Late fees

Regarding late-payment fees, Dan of Campbell Hall, NY, says he's had a WaMu credit card for five years and has always paid his card down. He tells ConsumerAffairs.com that when Chase acquired WaMu last year, his interest rate shot to 29.99 percent and his account was closed. He says Chase refused to re-activate the card, citing late payments.

When asked for documentation on the late payment, Dan says, "They responded by telling me the reason my interest was raised was that I was one day late on a payment. Apparently the due date was on a Sunday and they did not post the payment until Monday. My bank account (also Chase) shows the payment made on the Sunday. I am at wits end. The only reason they did this was to gouge consumers before the new laws go into effect in February."

CRL researcher, Josh Frank, the report's author, says the Credit CARD Act that Congress passed earlier this year was "a big improvement for American families. But our research shows that industry keeps finding clever ways to get around meaningful reform, and we need a regulator focused on making financial products fair."

The report spotlights a little-known tactic, which CRL calls "pick-a-rate." In this example, a card company tells cardholders their interest rate will be pegged to the prime rate, which until now has usually meant the prime rate on the last day of the last billing cycle. But CRL's analysis of the fine print finds that a growing number of issuers have added language that allows them to pick the highest prime rate in a 90-day period -- no longer a single day.

This change can significantly raise a cardholder's cost, often without his or her knowledge. This particular practice alone costs Americans $720 million a year and, CRL predicts, could grow to $2.5 billion annually in a few years as the practice spreads.

Larger late fees

In addition, all of the top eight credit card issuers have increasingly imposed large late fees across the board for borrowers, even for smaller balances. The marketing around late fees is deceptive. Credit card issuers claim to impose late fees on a sliding scale that charges a larger flat fee for larger total balances. In fact CRL says issuers have steadily lowered the amount it takes to be considered in the highest balance category and, consequently, subject to the largest fees.

This penalty structure has undergone a fundamental shift since 2003, when a balance of $1,000 triggered a $35 late fee. Since then credit card issuers have lowered the cutoff for the balance that triggers the highest late fee, so that today a balance of $250 is assessed the same penalty fee as a $1,000 balance. The result is nine of every ten cardholders will incur the largest fee if they pay late. In addition, the average late fee today is $39, while the typical past-due amount is approximately $50.

Other practices that have become increasingly common, according to the Center, include imposing minimum finance charges; inactivity fees; fees on international transactions; fees (in addition to interest charges) on balance transfers and on cash advance fees; and variable rates that have artificially high floors.

While the Credit CARD Act of May 2009 will stop some of the worst abuses in the industry, CRL says it believes a strong Consumer Financial Protection Agency would provide common-sense rules on credit cards and could respond to abuses quickly as they surface, before they become widespread.



CRL: Credit Card Issuers Looking For Ways Around Anti-Abuse Rules...

Senator Presses Credit Card Companies on Unauthorized Charges

Responding to complaints about unauthorized credit card charges, Senate Commerce Committee Chairman Jay Rockefeller (D-WV) is asking credit card companies what they know about the practice.

In a letter to Visa, American Express and Mastercard, Rockefeller said aggressive online sales tactics often end up with consumer's credit cards charged for unwanted club memberships.

Rockefeller says millions of online consumers have been enrolled in these membership clubs and their credit card or debit cards have been charged even though they never provided the companies with their credit card or debit card numbers.

"There are more than 4 million American consumers whose credit cards are being charged by mysterious membership clubs after shopping online and most of these four million consumers don't even know it's happening," Rockefeller said.

Rockefeller sent the letters after a Commerce Committee staff report and hearing showed that a key component of the aggressive online sales tactics is the use of a so-called "data pass" process, which enables websites to transfer consumers' billing information, including consumers' credit or debit card numbers, to the companies selling the club membership.

Data pass

Rockefeller maintains "data pass" has allowed these companies to present misleading enrollment offers to consumers, has led to significant consumer confusion, and has caused millions of American consumers to become enrolled and charged for membership clubs they did not want and were unaware they had signed up for.

"Through the Committee's investigation, we learned these online club scams have made more than $1.4 billion dollars through these tactics and charged more than 30 million Americans," Rockefeller said. "This next step in our investigation will help us better understand how millions of American consumers' credit card accounts can be charged every month for services they don't want."

One membership marketer responded to Rockefeller's assertion by saying enrolling in its programs requires more than a simple mouse click. In a statement, Webloyalty.com said it requires consumers to enter the last four digits of their credit card, confirm their email address, and click on a button to confirm the sale.

Over the years, ConsumerAffairs.com has received hundreds of complaints from consumers who express bewilderment and anger at being signed up for membership programs, providing discounts on travel, entertainment and other expenses. The mysterious charges usually coincide with a credit card purchase made with another company.

The letters Rockefeller sent to Visa, American Express, and MasterCard request information related to cardholder inquiries about unauthorized charges stemming from "data pass" and any efforts made by the companies to reduce the number of "chargeback" requests from cardholders. Visa, American Express, and MasterCard have likely processed millions of charges for membership clubs that were not authorized by cardholders, Rockefeller said.



Senator Presses Credit Card Companies on Unauthorized Charges...

Interchange Fees Fleecing Consumers, Retailers Say

December 4, 2009
The nation's retailers are stepping up their campaign against credit card interchange fees, claiming they don't punish merchants nearly as much as they punish consumers.

An interchange fee is the fee paid by the merchant's bank to the bank issuing the consumer's credit card. The fee is charged back to the merchant and the Retail Industry Leaders Association (RILA), a trade group, says the fee is ultimately paid by the consumer.

In the wake of credit card reform, interchange fees have come under closer scrutiny in Washington. Last month the Government Accountability Office issued a report suggesting that credit card companies and their issuing banks profit significantly from interchange fees while merchants and consumers face escalating costs.

Since then the RILA has pushed for Congress to take action, as it did with the new law passed in May to limit credit card abuses. The American Consumer Institute is also calling for reform of interchange fees, claiming that this holiday season the average household will pay $337 in so-called swipe fees.

RILA says the burden posed by interchange fees is a drag on business and is making a slow jobs recovery even worse, at least as far as the retail sector is concerned.

"Retail job creation is stifled in part by the rapidly escalating costs associated with credit card interchange 'swipe' fees," said John Emling, senior vice president of government affairs for the group. "Every additional dollar taken by banks through these excessive fees is a dollar unavailable to hire new employees and lower costs for customers."

Banks say interchange fees are necessary to pay for processing credit and debit card transactions. However, RILA says these fees have tripled in the U.S. since 2001, to $48 billion in 2008, despite advances in technology that have reduced other comparable transactional costs. Today, the group says retailers' cost of processing paper checks is less than the cost of accepting credit and debit cards.

The issue has, to date, failed to gain much traction in Congress. Rep. John Conyers (D-MI) introduced the "Credit Card Fair Fee Act of 2008," which would have required lenders possessing "substantial market power" to negotiate with merchants and retailers on terms for fees paid when processing card transactions. However, the bill failed to make it to the floor for a vote.



Interchange Fees Fleecing Consumers, Retailers Say...

Minnesota Sues Clinic For Credit Card Fraud

December 2, 2009
The State of Minnesota is taking a chiropractic clinic to court, accusing it of fraudulently enrolling patients for credit cards issued by GE Money Bank, the nation's largest issuer of health care credit cards.

The state's Attorney General, Lori Swanson, and the Minnesota Board of Chiropractic Examiners filed the lawsuit against Okeson Optimal Chiropractic clinic, a Lakeville, Minn., chiropractic clinic, and its owner, Erik Okeson, D.C. The suit claims the clinic fraudulently enrolled patients in health care credit cards by usurping the identities of unrelated third parties and listing them as credit card co-applicants without their knowledge and by inflating patients' actual income.

By listing unsuspecting strangers as co-applicants on other patient's credit cards and inflating patients' real income, the clinic jeopardized patients' credit histories and obligated patients to repay credit card bills on lines of credit for which they otherwise may not qualify," Swanson said . "The clinic wanted patients to qualify for these credit cards so it could pre-bill the cards and make money."

According to the complaints, the defendants pre-billed patients' CareCredit credit cards amounts ranging from $1,200 to $4,300, prior to all services being delivered. If a patient did not pay back the amount charged on a CareCredit credit card on time, default interest rates of up to 29.99 percent apply.

The lawsuit alleges that defendants engaged in the following types of credit card fraud in order to create a source of funding to pre-bill their chiropractic services:

Pre-billing

First, the lawsuit alleges that, in order to ensure that primary applicants qualified for credit cards on which defendants could pre-bill thousands of dollars in up-front charges, the defendants in some cases falsely listed unsuspecting co-applicants on other patients' credit cards, thereby usurping their identities and harming their credit. A co-applicant on a credit card is financially liable for the charges incurred on the credit card by the primary applicant.

The unsuspecting co-applicants typically provided their name and Social Security number to the defendants as part of an initial health screening by the clinic. Some patients learned that the defendants added a co-applicant to their application when they received a CareCredit credit card in the mail along with a statement that included the name of the unknown co-applicant.

The "co-applicants" did not consent to be co-applicants, were not aware they were made co-applicants, and did not know the primary applicant. Some of Okesons patients who were listed as co-applicants on strangers credit cards without their permission have discovered the fraudulent accounts on their credit reports.

Second, the lawsuit alleges that, in order to ensure that primary applicants qualified for credit, defendants also in some cases submitted false and grossly inflated annual income to CareCredit for the patientincome far in excess of the actual income reported by the patient to the clinic.

For example, defendants allegedly told the credit card company that a retiree with annual income of $30,000 earned $120,000; that a gas station worker with annual income of $15,000 earned $180,000; and that a 22-year old nurse's aide earning $15,000 per year earned $120,000.

Inflating incomes

Defendants reportedly told CareCredit that 108 of 283 patients enrolled in CareCredit had income of exactly $120,000 per year. By inflating patients' income to GE Money Bank, defendants obligated patients to repay credit card bills on lines of credit for which they otherwise may not qualify, Swanson said.

Over a 26-month period from June, 2007 through July, 2009, defendants placed about $632,000 in charges on credit cards issued to their patients by CareCredit.

By falsely listing unsuspecting strangers as co-applicants on other patients' credit cards and by inflating patients' income, defendants jeopardized the credit histories of the co-applicants, defrauded the credit card company, and obligated the original patients to repay credit card bills on lines of credit for which they otherwise might not qualify, the complaint alleges.

In recent years, many of the country's largest financial institutions have begun to sell health care credit cards to patients, capitalizing on rising health care costs and gaps in insurance coverage. According to a report by McKinsey & Company, consumers currently charge about $45 billion in out-of-pocket medical expenses on credit cards, and that number has been estimated to triple to $150 billion by 2015.

This is the second lawsuit that Swanson and the Board have filed against a chiropractic clinic for health care credit card fraud. In August, Swanson and the Board filed a lawsuit against Express Health, P.A. and its owner, Cory Couillard, D.C., for enrolling patients in health care credit cards without their permission and inflating patients' income in order to qualify them for credit cards.

Okeson Optimal Chiropractic clinic accused of fraudulently enrolling patients for credit cards issued by GE Money Bank, the nation's largest issuer of heal...

Retailers Applaud GAO Report On Interchange Fees

By Mark Huffman
ConsumerAffairs.com

November 19, 2009
Consumers aren't the only ones who sometimes feel like they're being victimized by credit card companies. Lately, retailers have the same feeling.

While consumers pay higher and higher interest rates, retailers complain that interchange fees -- what they pay to credit card processors on consumer transactions -- are also going up at an increasing rate.

This week the Government Accountability Office (GAO), the watchdog arm of Congress, reported that credit card companies and their issuing banks profit significantly from interchange fees while merchants and consumers face escalating costs.

"The GAO report verifies what retailers, small and large, have been saying for years. Congress must act to reform this broken system and prevent credit card giants and their issuing banks from continuing to impose unjustifiable fees on retailers and their customers," said John Emling, senior vice president for government affairs at the Retail Industry Leaders Association.

Retailers claim fees have tripled

Interchange fees are imposed by credit card companies and issuing banks as a fee for processing credit and debit card transactions. However, RILA says these fees have tripled in the United States since 2001, to $48 billion in 2008, despite advances in technology that have reduced other comparable transactional costs. Today, for most retailers, the cost of processing paper checks is less than the cost of accepting credit and debit cards, the group said.

"Although issuers incur costs for offering cards, concerns remain about the extent to which interchange fee levels closely relate to the level of card program expenses or whether they are set high so as to increase issuer profits," the GAO said in its report. "In a competitive market, the price of the product and the cost of producing it would be closely aligned. However, producers with market power-such as monopolists or those offering goods not generally offered by others-have the ability to charge high, noncompetitive prices."

In 2008, Visa and MasterCard represented 71 percent of the credit card market and 88 percent of all interchange fees were collected by the top ten managing banks. The report also takes issue with credit card industry claims that interchange fees had not increased.

Caps on fees?

"Visa and MasterCard officials told us that their average effective interchange rates applied to transactions have remained fairly constant in recent years when transactions on debit cards, which have lower interchange fee rates, are included," the GAO said. However, our own analysis of Visa and MasterCard interchange rate schedules shows that the interchange rates for credit cards have been increasing and their structures have become more complex, as hundreds of different interchange fee rate categories for accepting credit cards now exist."

The GAO report suggests capping or limiting interchange fees would reduce fee costs most directly, and that it was reasonable to think these savings would be passed along to consumers. The report says that was the case in Australia, when that country took similar action.

"Yesterday's GAO Report moves the debate for meaningful interchange fee reform to a new level," Emling said. "By refuting the falsehoods and misrepresentations of reform opponents, this report was proof-positive that Congress must follow the lead of more than 30 other countries and reform an out of control system that harms merchants and consumers."

Congress debated legislation last year that would have applied new regulations to interchange fees, but it failed to pass.



Retailers Applaud GAO Report On Interchange Fees...

Companies Sued For Credit Card Interest Rate Scheme

Illinois Attorney General Lisa Madigan has filed suit targeting a telemarketing scam that promises to reduce consumers' credit card interest rates immediately, but ultimately fails to achieve any savings for consumers.

"During these difficult economic times, consumers are understandably looking for ways to ease the burdens of rising debt," Madigan said. "But I urge consumers to be wary when solicitors try to make tempting claims of 'immediate' savings. In such cases, the schemers rarely deliver and usually leave consumers in an even worse financial situation than before."

Madigan filed suit against Priority Direct Marketing International, Inc. (PDMI), a Bedford, Texas-based telemarketing firm run by its President, William Fithian, and Advanced Management Services NW, LLC (AMS), a Spokane, Wash.-based firm owned by Ryan Bishop.

The suit claims that the two companies work in a concerted telemarketing scheme to solicit and enroll consumers in deceptive debt negotiation service agreements that promise to immediately reduce consumers' credit card interest rates, with a guaranteed savings of $2,500.

PDMI and AMS telemarketing representatives allegedly promise consumers that the companies will negotiate with consumers' credit card companies to lower interest rates, and will provide full refunds if they are unsuccessful.

After consumers agree to enroll in the program, the telemarketing schemers allegedly charge consumers' credit cards for set up fees ranging from $391 up to $1,590, the suit contends. The defendants allegedly tell consumers that these fees will be reimbursed at a later date by the consumers' banks. Only after consumers' credit cards are charged for the setup fees do they receive any documentation on the program's terms and conditions, which on several points, contradict the telemarketers claims in their sales solicitations.

Specifically, PDMI and AMS misleadingly claim that they can guarantee an interest rate reduction for all customers or provide full refunds in instances where rate reductions are not secured. When customers have requested refunds, after the defendants have failed to negotiate any interest rate reductions, the defendants allegedly refuse altogether or give refunds minus a non-refundable $199 fee that was not disclosed during the sales pitch.

Madigan's lawsuit charges the defendants with violating the Illinois Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Business Practices Act by misrepresenting the services they provide to consumers and the effects the services will have on consumers' credit.

The suit asks the court to enter a permanent injunction barring the defendants from engaging in debt settlement in Illinois and to order the defendants to pay restitution for complainants, civil penalties of $50,000 for violating the Consumer Fraud Act, and an additional $50,000 for each violation committed with the intent to defraud.

Madigan advises consumers looking for legitimate financial assistance to consider credit counseling services that charge modest fees and provide true financial and budget counseling based on a consumer's personal circumstances.



Companies Sued For Credit Card Interest Rate Scheme...

Report: Deceptive Credit Card Practices Remain Widespread

By James Limbach
ConsumerAffairs.com

October 29, 2009
One hundred percent of credit cards offered online by the leading bank card issuers continue to include practices that will be outlawed once legislation passed in May takes effect next year, according to a new report by the Pew Health Group's Safe Credit Cards Project.

The report also found that advertised credit card interest rates rose an average of 20 percent in the first two quarters of 2009, even as banks' cost of lending declined. With the Federal Reserve currently developing rules to ensure penalty charges are "reasonable and proportional" as required under the Credit CARD Act, the report also includes policy recommendations for regulators.

"Since passage of the Credit CARD Act, we found that credit card issuers have done little to remove practices deemed unfair or deceptive by the Federal Reserve," said Shelley A. Hearne, managing director of the Pew Health Group, which oversees the project. "In fact, some of the most harmful practices have actually grown more widespread-not one of the bank cards reviewed would meet the legal requirements outlined in the Credit CARD Act, which is bad news for consumers."

The new report examines all consumer credit cards offered online by the largest 12 bank issuers in America. These banks control more than 90 percent of outstanding credit card debt nationwide. The report also reviewed cards offered by the largest credit unions.

The Pew Safe Credit Cards Project gathered data from July of this year on nearly 400 cards, building on its previous research from December 2008.

Key findings of the report show that:

• 99.7 percent of bank cards allowed issuers to increase interest rates on outstanding balances -- a jump from 93 percent in December;

• 95 percent of bank cards permitted issuers to apply payments in a way the Federal Reserve found likely to cause substantial financial injury to consumers; and

• 90 percent of bank cards had penalty rate hikes with the vast majority imposed by "hair triggers" of one or two late payments in a year.

"The Federal Reserve must ensure that the rules it is developing will prevent unreasonable or disproportionate penalties, including penalty rate increases, which our data show remain far too common," said Nick Bourke, manager of Pew's Safe Credit Cards Project.

In July, median advertised annual percentage rates (APRs) for purchases on bank issued cards were between 12.24 and 17.99 percent, compared with a range of 9.99 to 15.99 percent in December 2008 (issuers advertise a range of rates depending on applicant credit profiles). Compared with December of last year, lowest advertised bank rates grew by more than 20 percent, while highest advertised rates grew by 13 percent.

Pew's previous report showed that issuers raised rates on nearly one-quarter of existing accounts, costing consumers a minimum of $10 billion in a one-year period between 2007 and 2008.

The report also provides the first comprehensive comparison of bankcards to those issued by credit unions, based on advertised terms and conditions. The analysis showed that credit unions offered much lower APRs, less punitive penalty rates and engaged in far fewer unfair or deceptive practices than their commercial peers.

To ensure that the Credit CARD Act is implemented to meet its goal of safeguarding the consumer, the report outlines policy recommendations for the Federal Reserve and other regulators to ensure that the new rules under development will:

• Regulate penalty interest rate increases in its rules governing "reasonable and proportional" penalty fees and charges in accordance with the law;

• Scrutinize partially variable rates, which can increase when the index rises but cannot drop below a minimum set by the issuer; and

• Eliminate credit card penalties that are not aligned with achieving the Act's primary goals of protecting consumers against risky practices.

"When the Credit CARD Act takes effect next year Americans can expect to see safer, more transparent cards," said Bourke. "How well the new law works, however, will depend significantly on how the Federal Reserve creates new rules under the law to protect consumers. In the meantime, issuers have the opportunity to move as quickly as possible to ensure their products are clear of the unfair and deceptive practices that unfortunately remain part of every card we reviewed for our report."



Report: Deceptive Credit Card Practices Remain Widespread...

Dodd Bill Would Freeze Credit Card Rates

By Truman Lewis
ConsumerAffairs.com

October 27, 2009
Sen. Christopher Dodd (D-Conn.) has introduced a measure that would immediately freeze credit card interest rates, as Congress continues trying to rein in the financial services sector.

Dodd, who heads the Senate Banking Committee, said credit card companies are using the delayed implementation of legislation passed earlier this year to jack up fees and interest rates.

We worked long and hard to enact the safeguards included in the Credit CARD Act, said Dodd, who had introduced the bill in 2004, 2005 and 2008 before successfully passing it this spring. And no sooner had it been signed into law, but credit card companies were looking for ways to get around the protections this Congress and the American people demanded.

"At a time when families are struggling to make ends meet, jacked up rates can quickly create crushing debt. People need to be responsible with their money, but they shouldnt be taken to the cleaners by outrageous rates, Dodd said.

The Credit CARD Act requires 45-day notification of interest rate increases, and lengthens from 14 days to 21 days the amount of time before the due date that a statement must be delivered, but it does not become fully effective until Feb. 1, 2010.

In April, Dodd and Sen. Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.) sent a letter to the heads of the Federal Reserve, OTS, and NCUA calling on them to implement an emergency freeze on interest rates tied to existing balance on credit cards.

In the House, Reps. Carolyn Maloney (D-N.Y.) and Rep. Barney Frank (D-Mass.), who chairs the House Financial Services Committee, have pushed to speed up implementation of the CARD measure to December 1, 2009, two months ahead of schedule.

When it finally takes effect, the CARD Act will require credit card companies to review every account that has seen an interest rate increase since January 1, 2009 and reduce rates where warranted.

Dodd sent a letter to the Chairman of the Federal Reserve and the heads of key regulatory agencies in July directing them to let credit card companies know that they will be held accountable for rate increases. He also called on the Federal Reserve to provide clear, robust requirements for the reviews and called on the agencies enforcing those regulations to hold the credit card companies strictly accountable for conducting thorough reviews and decreasing rates.

Dodd Bill Would Freeze Credit Card Rates...

Annual Credit Card Fee Makes a Comeback

By Mark Huffman
ConsumerAffairs.com

October 14, 2009
When Congress passed credit card reform legislation in May, many industry analysts warned that lenders would find new ways to extract the revenue they would soon be losing from consumers.

Among the mentioned new fees is actually an old one -- the annual fee.

When credit cards were first introduced almost all cards charged an annual fee. But as the industry grew more competitive, with more and more banks and financial services firms offering cards, the annual fee gradually disappeared from major bank cards.

Now, Bank of America says it will begin test marketing a new "membership" fee for some of its customers. In other words, not every customer will be assessed the charge. If those who are charged don't cancel their cards or protest too loudly, presumably all customers will soon be required to pay it.

While other banks are expected to follow suit, it may be helpful to point out that many current credit card users are already paying an "annual fee" for the privilege of carrying a credit card.

Small credit card issuers that target the subprime market have always charged a high annual fee, one of the many things making these low credit limit cards such bad deals.

Michael, of Hershey, Pa., said he paid a $100 annual fee recently on his Imagine Visa card.

"This month I get a letter stating that their credit card program has ended, and that my account will be closed immediately," he told ConsumerAffairs.com. "If they would have sent a letter, stating their intentions, before charging me the annual fee of $100, I would have paid the balance off and cancelled the card myself."

But to other credit card customers, the appearance of an annual fee on their credit card bill comes as a surprise. Rick, of Erskine, Minn., said he had never been assessed an annual fee on his Washington Mutual credit card. Then Washington Mutual was acquired by JP Morgan Chase earlier this year.

"I got a charge for over the limit, which was only a few bucks over my limit," Rick told ConsumerAffairs.com. "I looked at my account and saw that what put me over was a $39 annual fee. I had not warning about this charge and didn't know about it."

When major banks offer a credit card in partnership with another business, such as a hotel or airline, customers often get slapped with an annual fee, although some customers might overlook it. Jennifer, of Murray, Utah, wanted to use her Marriott Rewards Credit Card for a major purchase and called the company to determine how much credit she had.

"I proceeded with the charge and was quickly notified that it was declined because it put me over the credit limit by $65 - their annual fee that is not published on all of the marketing material," Jennifer told ConsumerAffairs.com. "I called customer service to rectify the situation, they passed me on to three different representatives before they told me it was my fault for not expecting the annual fee to be included in my balance."

Last year Anna, of Brooklyn, N.Y., lost her Citicard and asked for a new one. The replacement card was Citi's new Diamond Preferred Rewards card, even though she just wanted a replacement for her old card.

"When I called to inquire about the change, I was told that the new card works just the same as the old card, and only adds the "Thank You Network" feature, at no charge," she told ConsumerAffairs.com. "I asked if I can instead have my old card back, and was told no. Now, less than a year later, I'm being charged a $30 membership fee, for doing nothing more than always paying the card charges in full every month. This change comes without any notice, although the company claims that there was a letter."

Is there anyway to get out of paying an annual fee? Maybe. Scott Bilker, who writes the Dollar Stretcher Blog and is author of Talk Your Way Out Of Credit Card Debt, suggests calling and asking politely if the bank would waive the fee. He says in his experience, 95 percent of the time the bank will agree.



Annual Credit Card Fee Makes a Comeback...

Credit Card Holders Angrily Abandon Their Cards

October 5, 2009
Credit card holders are angry. More than one-third (32%) have paid off and closed a card since January 2008, and half of those that canceled did so in direct response to the actions of credit-card issuers, such as cutting limits, hiking rates, or imposing fees, according to a national poll by Consumer Reports.

Twenty-one percent of respondents said they were treated unfairly by card companies, and only 41 percent said they were highly satisfied with their card issuer, making credit cards one of the lowest-rated services that Consumer Reports covers.

The level of public anger about card issuers shows in the results of Consumer Reports nationally representative survey of 1,211 credit card users, conducted in July, as well as in scores of irate letters and e-mails Consumer Reports has received from readers.

The survey also found that 45 percent of respondents say they charging less, 43 percent say they are spending about the same, and 11 percent are charging more than they did a year ago.

How much they owe

How much don consumers owe?

• 54% pay their balances in full each month
• 13% carry balances over $10,000 (Median $17,366)
• 33% carry balances up to $10,000 (Median $2,554)

Consumer Reports survey showed credit-card users tended to fall into three camps. One group is made up of consumers who generally pay their bills on time but use cards for convenience or to rack up rewards. Then there are those who reported moderate balances and reasonable prospects of eventually paying off that debt.

The third group includes consumers with debts totaling $10,000 or more, often from spending for emergencies; 44 percent of that group said they wouldnt be able to survive financially over the next six months without relying on their credit cards to meet monthly expenses.

Depending on which camp your credit needs fall into, Consumer Reports November report offers a complete strategy guide to dealing with credit card issues, finding the right cards for your needs, and protecting your credit score. The report is available at www.ConsumerReports.org.



Credit Card Holders Angrily Abandon Their Cards...

American Express Axes Gift Card Fee


One of the more aggravating aspects of gift cards are the fees that companies tack on. Take John of Lansdale, PA. When his 10-year-old son tried to use the $50 gift card he'd forgotten he had, he found there was only $12 left on the card.

But not to worry. From now on, American Express says its monthly fee is a thing of the past.

The company said it is eliminating monthly fees on all of its gift cards, including those now in stores, those headed to market for the coming holidays, and those already purchased that are in consumers' wallets and purses. The change is effective immediately.

American Express sees this move as a transformational event because it says consumers don't have to worry about using the card quickly. The monthly $2 fee in the past meant that the gift card lost value every month until it was used up.

American Express says it is the only major issuer of universal, or "general purpose," gift cards to eliminate all fees after purchase, which consumers can only hope becomes a trend.

"Customers told us that monthly fees undermine the value of gift cards, plain and simple," said Alpesh Chokshi, president of Global Prepaid, American Express. "We believe this sets a new gold standard among gift cards and provides a win for consumers and our business. With today's announcement, recipients now have a gift card that's 100 percent gift, 0 percent fees."

Consumers have not only been telling American Express how much they despise the fees, they've filed more than 170 complaints with ConsumerAffairs.com about the fees and related problems.

American Express says its gift cards now have no fees after purchase -- no fees for activation, no fees for checking a balance, no fees for monthly servicing, no fees for card replacement, and the funds on the cards never expire.

The fees aren't the only problems customers experience with the cards, however. Many of those who write to ConsumerAffairs.com say the cards are declined for obscure reasons.

"NEVER, NEVER, NEVER, NEVER" are the words I am using to describe the American Gift Cards to my friends, acquaintances and anyone standing in line within the sound of my voice," wrote Saundra of Upper Marlboro, MD. "I have been embarrassed numerous times trying to use these cards. ... As long as I have a mouth to talk, I am telling everyone to leave the American Express Gift Cards alone -- they are not worth the hassle and embarrassment.""

Saundra and others complain that their gift cards -- or, even worse, those they buy for friends and family -- are repeatedly declined even though they have adequate value remaining to cover the disputed purchase. Efforts to resolve the issue are often unsuccessful.

What brought on American Express' change in policy when it comes to fees? Perhaps the market made it necessary.

Gift card sales were weak during last year's holiday season as consumers, shocked by the sudden drop in the economy, chose discounted items as gifts, rather than spending on gift cards. Sales of gift cards are also expected to be weak this season, down as much as six percent, according to some retail forecasts.



American Express Axes Gift Card Fee...

Fed Proposes New Credit Card Rules

September 29, 2009
The Federal Reserve has amended its credit card rules, drafted last December, to bring thing into line with the tougher consumer protection aspects of a law passed in May. The rules are designed to protect consumers from some long-standing abuses by the credit card industry.

"This proposal is another step forward in the Federal Reserve's efforts to ensure that consumers who rely on credit cards are treated fairly," said Federal Reserve Governor Elizabeth A. Duke. "The rule bans several harmful practices and requires greater transparency in the disclosure of the terms and conditions of credit card accounts."

Among other things, the proposed rule would:

• Protect consumers from unexpected increases in credit card interest rates by generally prohibiting increases in a rate during the first year after an account is opened and increases in a rate that applies to an existing credit card balance.

• Prohibit creditors from issuing a credit card to a consumer who is under the age of 21 unless the consumer has the ability to make the required payments or obtains the signature of a parent or other cosigner with the ability to do so.

• Require creditors to obtain a consumer's consent before charging fees for transactions that exceed the credit limit.

• Limit the high fees associated with subprime credit cards.

• Ban creditors from using the "two-cycle" billing method to impose interest charges.

• Prohibit creditors from allocating payments in ways that maximize interest charges.

In December 2008, the Fed adopted final regulations prohibiting unfair credit card practices and improving the disclosures consumers receive in connection with credit card accounts. However, Congress and the Obama Administration said tougher rules were needed. This Fed proposal amends aspects of those 2008 regulations to incorporate provisions of the Credit Card Accountability Responsibility and Disclosure Act of 2009 (Credit CARD Act), which was enacted in May 2009.

The proposed rule represents the second stage of the Fed's implementation of the Credit Card Act. On July 15, 2009, the Board issued an interim final rule implementing the provisions of the Credit Card Act that went into effect on August 20, 2009.

The proposed rule would implement the provisions that go into effect on February 22, 2010. The remaining provisions of the Credit CARD Act go into effect on August 22, 2010 and will be implemented by the Federal Reserve at a later date.

Some consumer advocates have complained that both the Fed and Congress waited too long to implement the new rules. Over the last few months many credit card companies have raised rates on existing balances and closed thousands of accounts before the new law and regulations could take effect.



Fed Proposes New Credit Card Rules...

Lawmakers Propose Faster Adoption Of New Credit Card Rules

By Mark Huffman
ConsumerAffairs.com

September 25, 2009
When Congress passed a package of credit card reforms in May, the new law gave banks until February 1, 2010 before the new rules would be implemented. Now, some lawmakers say that was too much time.

Two Congressional Democrats, Rep. Carolyn Maloney (D-NY) and Rep. Barney Frank (D-MA), who chairs the House Financial Services Committee, said they will push to speed up implementation on December 1, 2009, two months ahead of schedule.

Maloney said credit card companies have used the time between passage of the law and the implementation date to squeeze additional money out of their customers. For example, under the new law, credit card companies will not be allowed to raise rates on existing balances. They can't raise rates without notifying customers 45 days in advance. Maloney says that has led to a flurry of changes to credit card account terms over the last couple of months.

Starting in June, Chase began contacting customers who had taken advantage of a promotion and transferred large balances to a Chase account at a low interest rate that was promised for the life of the loan. But the guarantee said nothing about the minimum monthly payment.

At the time of the promotion, the minimum monthly payment was two percent, and many customers, like Waymon, of Deland, Fla., made the balance transfer based on what they could afford to pay monthly.

"I took advantage of the 4.9 percent offer," Daymon told ConsumerAffairs.com. "Chase has now increased the monthly payment to five percent. The balance on this card is approximately $9200, which means the minimum monthly payment went from $190 to $469."

Waymon says a Chase customer service rep told him he could continue paying the two percent per month, but that the annual interest rate would go up. Other Chase customers who have participated in the "low interest rate for the life of the card" promotion have posted similar stories.

Chase also closed a large number of accounts that were former Washington Mutual Credit Card accounts. Neither of those activities would be specifically barred under the new rules, but industry analysts say all credit card companies are trying to get themselves in the most favorable financial position possible before the new rules take effect. It seems nearly every credit card company adjusted its rates over the summer months.

"On Capital One's credit card statement this month, I noticed the percentage rate had jumped from 7.9 percent to 17.9 percent," Brian, of Hazelton, Pa., told ConsumerAffairs.com. "I contacted customer service and was told this rise was due to the current economic climate."

The "economic climate" is not specifically about the interest rate climate. Interest rates are near an all time low, hardly a reason to be raising consumers' credit card rates. Instead, banks are increasingly worried about customers' ability to repay the money they have borrowed.

The credit card default rate has risen past 10 percent, so banks are attempting to collect more money from customers who are still paying their bills to offset potential losses on other accounts.

Consumers, however, are confused and angry and have pressured lawmakers like Maloney and Frank for relief.

The two lawmakers say they will sponsor legislation to speed up implementation of reforms, but with Congress's full plate of issues, the legislation -- which would have to be passed in the next 60 days -- faces an uncertain future.

It will also face strong opposition from the banking industry. A spokesman for the American Bankers Association said it would be extremely difficult, if not impossible, to meet the December 1 deadline.



Lawmakers Propose Faster Adoption Of New Credit Card Rules...

Survey: Americans Want Consumer Agency For Financial Products And Services

By James Limbach
ConsumerAffairs.com

September 11, 2009
A year after the Lehman Brothers bankruptcy froze credit markets and sent the stock market into a nosedive, consumers overwhelmingly want government action to increase consumer protections for financial products and services, according to a new national poll released by the Consumer Federation of America (CFA).

In a country where skepticism about the role of government is high, 57 percent of those polled support the creation of a new federal agency to protect consumers who purchase banking and other financial products and services.

Those most likely to be adversely affected by many unfair and deceptive financial practices -- adults under 35 blacks, Hispanics and low-income individuals -- expressed the strongest support for a new consumer protection agency.

"Americans are fed up with the tricks and traps that they confront daily as they purchase and use financial products and services," said Travis Plunkett, CFA's Legislative Director. "To add insult to injury, the same firms that benefited from a taxpayer bailout are hitting consumers with exorbitant and unjustified charges. Americans want a cop on the beat to rein in these abuses, which helped trigger the current economic crisis and have worsened the plight of those hardest hit by the recession."

President Obama proposed the creation of the Consumer Financial Protection Agency in response to the perceived failure of regulators to rein in lending that helped bring down the economy.

Chairman Barney Frank of the House Financial Services Committee and Chairman Christopher Dodd of the House Banking Committee have both strongly endorsed the agency. The House Financial Services Committee is scheduled to take up the legislation to establish the new agency in the next few weeks.

Poll results

The poll of 1018 people conducted by Caravan Opinion Research Corporation for CFA asked specifically about mortgage lending, bank practices, and credit cards. The survey showed that, in the wake of the mortgage meltdown, Americans overwhelmingly support disclosure requirements on mortgage documents and limits on fees and certain practices:

• 89 percent support (82 percent strongly support) requiring banks to disclose all mortgage fees upfront, clearly and conspicuously.

• 67 percent support (58 percent strongly support) prohibiting banks from charging substantial penalties to borrowers who pay off mortgages early.

• 61 percent support (45 percent strongly support) prohibiting mortgage brokers from collecting additional fees from banks for persuading borrowers to purchase higher-rate mortgages.

• 61 percent support (48 percent strongly support) prohibiting mortgage brokers and banks from selling more expensive subprime mortgage loans to borrowers who qualify for less expensive regular mortgage loans.

Bank practices also are of concern to Americans. They support disclosure requirements and limits on overdraft practices.

• 85 percent support (73 percent strongly support) requiring banks to disclose, on the ATM screen, that a withdrawal will overdraw an account.

• 71 percent support (44 percent strongly support) requiring banks to gain the permission of customers before routinely providing loans to cover these overdrafts.

• 70 percent support (53 percent strongly support) requiring banks to pay checks in the order they are received, as opposed to the current practice of allowing banks to routinely pay the largest first, which drains some accounts more quickly and increases bounced check fees.

More regulations

In spite of the recent enactment of credit card protections by Congress, consumers still believe that additional prohibitions on particular credit card practices are necessary:

• 67 percent support (55 percent strongly support) prohibiting credit card companies from extending total lines of credit that exceed a person's annual income.

• 63 percent support (51 percent strongly support) prohibiting credit card companies from increasing the interest rate on one card because of their payment history on another card.



Survey: Americans Want Consumer Agency For Financial Products And Services...

Low Credit Utilization Can Drive Up Your Credit Score

This is one case where "use it or lose it" definitely doesn't apply. For a higher credit score, almost all financial gurus suggest keeping your credit balances low in relation to your lines of credit.

Your credit utilization ratio is determined by the amount of credit you've used, compared to the amount you have at your disposal. For example, if you have three credit cards with a combined total of $50,000 in available credit, and your combined balances on the card is $25,000, your credit utilization ratio is 50 percent.

As recently as last year some financial advisors believed a credit utilization ratio of 50 percent was acceptable, but that was before last fall's credit crunch. Now, the recommended ratio is much less. Some advisors say no more than 25 percent - some say no more than 10 percent.

Unfortunately for millions of consumers, that's changing the rules in the middle of the game. Many already have a credit utilization ratio of 50 percent or higher. To make matters worse, credit card companies have begun reducing many customers' credit lines to their existing balances. That can push their credit utilization ratio to 90 percent or higher.

"I was a Washington Mutual customer with a low interest rate," Deel, or Berkley, California, told ConsumerAffairs.com. Now my credit card has been closed by Chase. I have never been late nor missed a payment."

Deel was one of thousands of former Washington Mutual cardholders who had their accounts closed by Chase, which took over the bank earlier this year. That reduction of credit made their credit utilization ratio spike upward.

"I had a Washington Mutual credit card, with a limit of $15000. I never missed a payment, was never late, always paid more than the minimum due, and paid it off last October, said Monica, of Santa Cruz, California.

With a zero balance on a $15,000 line of credit, Monica's credit utilization ratio should be very low.

"So in August, Chase decided to decrease the credit line from $15000 to $3800, she told ConsumerAffairs.com.

Unfortunately, when your credit utilization ratio goes up, your credit score goes down. The ratio is the second most important factor in determining your credit score, after timely bill payment.

In may be hard to do in this new credit environment, but consumers who find themselves with a rising credit utilization ratio should try to get another credit card and keep the balance low.

Another, more obvious step is to pay down your balances as quickly as possible. Liquidating other assets to pay off debt could provide significant benefits, if the result is an improvement in your credit score.

Why is your credit score so important? Financial services Website LendingTree.com says raising your credit score by 30 points will save the average consumer $105 a year.



Low Credit Utilization Can Drive UpYour Credit Score...

How To Survive The New Credit Card Rules

By Mark Huffman
ConsumerAffairs.com

August 24, 2009
The first phase of the Credit Card Accountability, Responsibility and Disclosure (CARD) Act of 2009 went into effect last week, with the rest of the rule changes taking effect in February. Congress changed the law to help consumers, but like many of Congress's actions, this one is producing unintended consequences.

True, the new law addresses some of the industry's long-standing abuses. It prevents lenders from raising rates on existing balances. Payments must be applied first to the part of your balance that has the highest interest rate. And universal default raising your rate because you happen to be late paying some other, unrelated bill will be a thing of the past.

But banks will still make profits, and if they don't get your money one way, they'll try to do it another way that isn't impacted by the new law. In fact, that process has already started. with credit card companies using the time between last May's passage of CARD and the effective date to do all the things they will soon be prevented from doing.

Many consumers who considered themselves good credit card customers have had their accounts unilaterally closed by the lender. Others have had their rates hiked substantially. Still others have seen their minimum monthly payments almost double.

Now, some consumers will be charged for the privilege of carrying a credit card. Citigroup announced last week that it will begin imposing an annual fee on account holders. Other banks are expected to follow suit.

To keep the credit you have and avoid new fees, there are a number of steps consumers should take.

First, if you have credit, use it. Most of us have one or two credit cards we like to use and tend to ignore the rest. In the new credit environment, banks will be quick to close accounts that lie dormant. An open credit line is an element of risk for a bank. If it's not providing revenue, the bank sees no reason to keep it open.

To prevent the lender from closing your account, try to use each card for a small purchase once every three months. When the bank reviews your account, it will see some activity and will be less likely to close it.

Second, don't add to your balances. In fact, pay them down if possible. Banks have been reducing credit limits and have targeted consumers with high debt to credit ratios.

Personal finance experts suggest a debt to credit ratio of 10 percent is ideal. If you don't carry a balance on the card paying it off in full each month you have almost nothing to worry about in that regard.

Third, look around for lower interest rate alternatives if you're carrying a balance on a major bank card. Almost all credit card issuers are raising rates to make up for the fact that delinquencies are on the rise.

That said, it will be very hard to find an interest rate below 10 percent in this new environment, even with stellar credit. But one often overlooked credit source is a credit union. By joining a credit union you should be able to get a credit card with a lower than average rate.

Finally, make sure you pay your credit card bill on time. The penalty for not doing so is steep, and will likely get steeper. Not only will you pay a late fee, the penalty rate for a missed payment could be in excess of 30 percent.

As the credit environment changes, consumers will have to stay alert. That means reading every communication that comes from your lender. It could contain important changes to your account, and not acting on the information could result in needlessly higher fees and interest rates in the new credit universe.



How To Survive The New Credit Card Rules...

Beware Health Clinics Pushing Credit Cards

Health care credit cards are designed to help consumers pay for uninsured health costs. They're supposed to be a better deal than regular credit cards, but they seem to draw the same kinds of complaints from consumers.

Amanda, of Newnan, Georgia, got a GE Money CareCredit card nearly two years ago to finance some extensive dental work. The terms were excellent - pay it off in 24 months and there would be no interest charges. She says she rapidly paid down the balance.

"I received a letter in February stating they were reducing my credit limit from $4,000 to $1,000 because of my credit score," she told ConsumerAffairs.com. "Well my credit score hadn't changed until they closed my account."

Amanda said she wasn't that upset, since she had paid her balance down from over $2500 to $346.

"Then I check my account today and they put $679 of accrued interest on my account. I highly recommend that you avoid them at all costs!"

Minnesota Attorney General Lori Swanson sees a bigger problem with these cards. When health care providers receive incentives to get their patients to open accounts, she says consumers often lose.

Swanson has just sued a Minnesota chiropractic clinic that she says enrolled patients in health care credit cards without their permission and then placed charges of up to $5,040 on those credit cards without patients' consent.

The lawsuit was filed against Express Health, P.A., a Minnesota chiropractic clinic, and its owner, Cory Couillard, D.C. The lawsuit alleges that Express Health and Couillard aggressively enrolled patients in the CareCredit Credit Card offered by GE Money Bank, convincing some patients to complete applications by telling them that they were not applying for a credit card but that the clinic simply wanted to check to see if they would qualify for credit.

The complaint further alleges that, unbeknownst to these patients, Express Health and Couillard then submitted the application to GE Money Bank, which issued a CareCredit credit card in the patient's name. To make matters worse, according to Swanson, the defendants sometimes submitted to the lender false annual income for patients, in some cases doubling or more patients' actual income. Once patients were issued a credit card, the defendants placed lump-sum charges of up to $5,040 on the credit card, without patients' knowledge or consent.

"The clinic engaged in predatory lending, only with health care credit cards instead of subprime mortgages," Swanson said. "The clinic jeopardized patients' credit ratings by fraudulently signing them up for credit cards and then charging their accounts thousands of dollars," she added.

GE Money Bank, the nation's largest issuer of health care credit cards, describes the CareCredit Credit Card as a "health care credit card that can be used as a payment option for certain expenses not covered by insurance or to bridge situations when desired care exceeds insurance coverage."

While a patient may believe they are borrowing the money interest-free, if they do not pay back the amount borrowed on a CareCredit credit card on time, default interest rates of up to 29.99 percent apply.

Swanson says patients should be very wary of high-pressure sales pitches in which they are marketed health care credit cards by health service providers. She said that chiropractors, dentists, medical clinics, cosmetic and eye surgeons, weight loss programs, hearing aid dispensers, and other providers sometimes aggressively promote health care credit cards as a way to make money for their clinics but that the credit cards may not always be in the best interests of patients.

"A clinic's primary interest in marketing health care credit cards as a sales agent for the lender is to boost its bottom line," Swanson said. "This may collide with the best interests of the patient, particularly when the credit cards come with high interest rates and high fees."

To illustrate the point, Swanson said her office received a complaint from a 91-year-old Minnesota woman whose hearing aid dispenser convinced her to take out a health care credit card to pay for her hearing aids. The woman- who lives on $12,000 per year in Social Security benefits-made all of her monthly payments of around $110 on time and thought that the credit card company would bill her for her final payment.

When she didn't receive a bill, she made the final payment just a few days after it was due. The credit card company then billed her for interest of $1,200--charged retroactively to the date of the original charge. Swanson says it turned out to be a very expensive way for a senior citizen on a fixed income to finance her hearing aids.



Beware Health Clinics Pushing Credit Cards: They're supposed to be a better deal than regular credit cards, but they seem to draw the same kinds of complai...

New Credit Card Law Not A Cure-All

By James Limbach
ConsumerAffairs.com

August 14, 2009
The first phase of the Credit CARD Act of 2009 goes into effect August 20, 2009. But if you think that means an end to your credit card problems, Eleanor Blayney, consumer advocate for the Certified Financial Planner Board of Standards, says, "Think again."

While the Act does put a lid on some unfair practices by credit card issuers, unless you -- the consumer -- make just as many changes in the way you use your card and credit, the new legislation won't necessarily improve your personal financial situation. In fact, you could be worse off than ever.

The law does aim to put a stop to the most egregious practices of the credit card industry. But it does not make credit cheaper or more available. And many of the provisions of the law do not come into effect for six months. This could mean trouble for consumers who now depend on every dollar of their current credit limit.

Until next February, card companies can still raise the interest rates on existing balances to compensate for their loss of revenue from the economic contraction and the rise of bankruptcies and delinquent accounts. They are also canceling accounts, and cutting credit limits, both of which have the effect of damaging consumers' FICO scores, which in turn makes them targets for rate increases.

These kinds of problems are legion:

• Denise of Scotchtown, New York, tells ConsumerAffairs.com that she has three credit cards with Chase - all with low interest rates. "Last winter," she says, "I was notified that my Chase Master card rate was being increased from 9.99% to 13.24% and that I had to either accept the rate increase OR I could choose to CLOSE the account in order to keep the prevailing rate. I opted to simply transfer the balance to a new card that I got through my credit union and let that go."

• Mario of West Palm Beach, Florida, writes, "My Visa card was cancelled without notification and the way I found out is when I tried to use it. I have kept it always on-time and paid more than the minimum for at least three years."

• Christine from West Warwick, Rhode Island informed ConsumerAffairs.com of this problem: "I have two credit cards with Bank of America (BOA), one with a much lower interest rate of 10.99 percent. I called to see if I could transfer the credit card with the higher interest rate of 24 percent to the one with the lower interest rate. I had a $22,000 credit limit on that card. Instead they lowered my credit limit and now raised the interest rate from 24 percent to 27.99 percent on that card."

When the Act takes effect, fees will take over from rate increases as the means for credit card companies to stay profitable, and even good credit risks who pay in full every month, will need to be on the lookout for the instances when these fees will be charged. Blayney says you can expect to pay extra for cash advances, service calls to a credit card company employee, paper statements, or balance transfers. She offers the following advice to consumers to make sure the new legislation works in their favor:

• Keep using your cards (so they don't get cancelled) but keep your balances low relative to your credit limit. Under the new law, credit card companies must give you longer lead time between billing you and the date you have to pay. Use that extra time to get extra funds to pay down that balance.

• Start actually reading those statements before you pay and shred them. They will become the vehicle to inform you of any changes in your credit limit or rates.

• Get out your BlackBerry or day planner: Time periods and dates become more important than ever under this new law. Make sure you pay your bill on time to avoid increased late fees; if you are late with a payment, make sure it is no more than 60 days late; if you get an interest increase because you go beyond that 60 days, make an extra effort to be on time for the next six months. If you meet that time requirement, the credit card companies are required to restore the lower rate you paid before you were delinquent.

The best advice, according to Blayney, "Use your credit card for the simple, original reason it was invented: as a more convenient form of cash. Do not use it because you do not have the cash in the first place. Think of it only as a very short-term loan between the time of purchase and the time you pay your bills. Forget about airline tickets and redeemable points: your greatest reward will be a more financially secure life."

New Credit Card Law Not A Cure-All...

Prepaid Calling Card Distributor Sued For Deceiving Consumers

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has extended its crackdown in the billion-dollar prepaid calling card industry -- asking a U.S. district court for a permanent halt to the illegal practices of a major calling card distributor and its principals.

The FTC has charged Diamond Phone Card, Inc., a distributor of prepaid calling cards based in Elmhurst, New York, and its principals with advertising that the calling cards they sold provided more minutes than they actually delivered. The complaint also accuses the defendants of failing to disclose adequately that fees could reduce the value of the calling cards. The FTC is seeking to force the defendants to give up the money they made through their deceptive tactics.

Diamond Phone Card marketed the cards to recent immigrants, many of whom rely on calling cards to stay in touch with family and friends in other countries. The defendants' advertisements made bold claims about the number of minutes the cards would provide for calls to a wide range of international locations, including the Dominican Republic, El Salvador, Mexico, India, Pakistan, and Guatemala.

But the FTC charges that consumers didn't receive the number of minutes advertised. For example, a calling card claiming to deliver 400 calling minutes to Mexico provided only 106 minutes of calling time, and one claiming to deliver 50 minutes of calling time to Honduras actually delivered only 20 minutes.

The FTC's complaint also claims that the defendants failed to properly disclose "maintenance" and other fees. For example, the defendants' ads trumpeted in large, colorful text the number of calling minutes their cards purportedly would provide. Less obvious to consumers, however, was a 79-cent "maintenance" fee that applied to $2 and $5 cards, and was "disclosed" in nearly illegible print on the very bottom of the advertisement.

This complaint follows two recent FTC actions against distributors of prepaid calling cards. In February 2009, Alternatel, Voice Prepaid, and Mystic Prepaid agreed to pay $2.25 million to resolve FTC allegations that they had deceived consumers. In June 2009, another leading distributor of prepaid cards, Clifton Telecard Alliance, agreed to pay $1.3 million to settle similar FTC charges.

The FTC has established a joint federal-state task force to address deceptive advertising and marketing practices in the prepaid calling card industry.

Prepaid Calling Card Distributor Sued For Deceiving Consumers...

Chase Continues To Tighten Consumer Credit

Last month JP Morgan Chase targeted its low-interest credit card holders with a big hike in minimum monthly payments, setting off howls of protests. This month Chase appears to have launched a campaign to close some accounts altogether.

David, of Gilbert, Arizona, said his Chase account was closed and he only found out when he tried to use the card.

"I tried to charge $25 to the card and it was denied. When I called Chase they said it was due to my credit report," he told ConsumerAffairs.com.

Tavis, of Alexandria, Virginia received a letter saying Chase is closing her account. She said she was told it was due to high balances and low available credit.

"This was a WAMU account that I've had for over three years," she told ConsumerAffairs.com. It was never late and I always paid over the minimum."

In fact, many of the complaints to ConsumerAffairs.com about Chase closing credit accounts appear to come from former Washington Mutual customers, who became Chase cardholders when Chase acquired WAMU.

Many consumers also are upset about the way they find out their credit card accounts have been closed. They say they learn about Chase's action when they try to use the card and it doesn't work.

"I don't have a letter, I don't have a packet that indicates that they have the right to shut off our accounts without our knowledge," said Susan, of Santa Clara, California. "They are okay with us being embarrassed by our cards being declined in stores or wherever we shop."

Denise, of Broadway Heights, Ohio, thinks her account closing has something to do with the fact that it's a former WAMU account, and sees a pattern with other complaints.

"They said they sent a letter over a week ago and I have not received it as of yet," she said. "I always paid my card off in full every month. Never left an outstanding balance. Also, customer service said the same thing about a credit agency report on me. I was also a customer of WAMU."

In fact, all credit card companies are taking action - some more aggressive than others--to reduce their portfolios. Customers that have the slightest credit blemish are being weeded out, or hit with a large interest rate increase. Even cardholders with good credit are being lumped in with more questionable customers.

Credit card companies say they are only protecting themselves. With rising default rates, they must prepare for the worst. Left unsaid is the fact that new credit card reforms take effect in February, which will restrict their ability to use these tactics--so they're getting as much revenue as they can while the getting is good.



Chase Continues To Tighten Consumer Credit...

New Credit Rules Bring Unintended Consequences

In the last two weeks credit card customers--from Chase to Bank of America to Capital One--have complained loudly about sudden changes in terms. Some have seen interest rates go from eight percent to 18 percent and higher. Others have been told their minimum monthly payments will more than double.

Much of this is occurring in advance of the effective date of the Credit Card Holders Bill of Rights, signed into law in May. This legislation, aimed at curbing long-standing abuses, appears to be the catalyst for sudden credit industry changes, according to both consumer groups and banking industry insiders.

"You've seen a lot of credit card companies already starting to raise their interest rates," said Ken Lin, founder and CEO of Credit Karma, a provider of credit reports and scores. "With default rates over 10 percent, credit card companies are trying to get ahead of the curve before the Credit Card Act takes effect."

Lin says credit card companies likely would have eventually taken a number of these steps to protect themselves in the new economic environment, but the Credit Card Act prompted them to act more quickly. He points to a number of what he calls "unintended consequences."

Under the new law, creditors can't raise interest rates on an existing balance unless a person is more than 60 days late on a payment. Creditors can only increase your APR on purchases made after that. But, he says, theres an unintended consequence.

"Since there isn't a limit on interest rates, creditors can quadruple your existing APR for the future purchases if they notify you in advance about a change to the account terms," Lin told ConsumerAffairs.com.

Also under the new law, credit companies cannot issue credit cards to people under the age of 21 unless they can prove that they have the means to repay the debt, or can get a co-signer.

So people under 21, Lin says, will use prepaid cards or secured credit cards to buy things. In the short term that might be healthy, he says, but over time it will reduce their ability to build a credit history.

The Credit Card Holders' Bill of Rights also requires creditors to provide a grace period for payments even if the person takes advantage of a promotional rate balance or deferred interest rate balance. The unintended result, he says is that consumers could see higher annual fees and increased minimum payments.

Over the years consumers have complained bitterly about "universal default," the practice of credit card companies raising a consumer's rate--not because they are late paying their credit card bill--but late on another, totally unrelated bill.

Consumers said that was unfair and Congress agreed, basically outlawing universal default. Lin calls that the Act's biggest, most far-reaching impact.

"People with marginal credit simply arent going to get access to credit any more and everyone else is going to be paying a little bit more," Lin said. "I know people are annoyed by this, but statistics bear out that if youre defaulting on one credit card, youll probably be defaulting on another one soon."

Even people with good credit often feel like they are being jerked around by their credit card company. Many a complaint to ConsumerAffairs.com begins with the words "I have never been late on a payment..." Lin says if you have a low interest rate, having good credit and a clean payment record might not matter.

"There's a segment of consumers whose rates are being raised simply because of the environment we're in," he said. "Credit card companies are looking at an average default rate of 10 and a half percent. If you've got an interest rate lower than 10 percent, and just the average defaulted, that whole portfolio would be losing money for the credit card company."

What's a credit card customer to do in this new environment? Lin says pain is likely to be felt at every level for a while, but that there are some things consumers can do to put themselves in a better position.

"Practically speaking, we've always urged consumers to have several cards--not a lot, but three or four," Lin said. "When particular credit card companies are closing lines and doubling fees, its good to have options."

In the new environment, credit may be a lot more important but harder to come by. Lin says consumers need to diversify now more than ever.

"I really feel credit cards are going to be drying up, I think annual fees will be back and consumers with a credit score below 700 are going to be in trouble, because the lenders that have survived are going to be raising their lending standards," Lin said.

Consumers can also protect the cards they have now by keeping them active. Use the card for a purchase every month or two and pay off the balance. Credit card companies are going to be closing inactive accounts because they are a liability," he says.

While lenders are already changing their terms, Lin believes consumers will continue to change their habits as well, and the era of every family having maxed out credit cards could become a thing of the past.

"I don't have a crystal ball that says people wont be revolving on their credit cards in the near future but there have been some really interesting growth trends," Lin said. "Debit and pre-paid credit cards are the fasting growing segment of the financial services industry. That, along with higher savings rates, may be suggestive of consumers going to more of a pay as you go system in the future, rather than carrying balances."

New Credit Rules Bring Unintended Consequences...

Congress Fumes Over Credit Card Rate Hikes


As consumers have been hit with huge interest rate hikes and increases in their minimum monthly payments, complaints about Americas credit card industry are reverberating through the halls of Congress.

CitiGroup, Bank of America and Capital One have all, in recent days, began raising customers interest rates, in many cases saying it has nothing to do with the customers performance and everything to do with making up for losses before new laws and regulations tie their hands early next year.

Chase has singled out its customers with the lowest interest rates, raising the minimum monthly payment from two percent of the balance to five percent. In many cases this action turns the credit card payment into the size of a home mortgage.

"This is what many of us feared about a law that didn't take effect right away," Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-NY) told The Washington Post.. "It was never going to take this long for the credit card companies to get ready for the new reforms. Instead, issuers are using the delay in the effective date to wring more dollars out of their customers. It is against the spirit of the law, and it is just plain wrong."

Rep. Carolyn Maloney (D-NY) authored the Credit Card Holder Bill of Rights legislation signed into law in May. She has been besieged with complaints from angry consumers.

Rate hikes on existing balances being reported by news media and consumers, even when consumers pay on time and follow the rules, are unfair and deceptive and must be stopped, she said. Capricious actions like these are why Congress overwhelmingly passed, and President Obama signed, my credit card reform bill: to level the playing field on behalf of consumers.

Maloneys protests not withstanding, Congress is pretty much powerless to stop credit card companies from raising rates and adjusting minimum payments, because they are allowed to do so under current laws and regulations. The changes do not take effect until February 2010.

Maloney notes that in another few weeks, one new rule will take effect requiring banks to provide a 45-day notice of any rate hikes. She and other Democrats on the Hill are using the consumer outcry over credit card company behavior to press for still more legislation.

All of this flurry of news is another example of why we need President Obamas Consumer Financial Products Safety Commission-- which the House will be considering in the weeks ahead, Maloney said.

In the Senate, Banking Committee Chairman Christopher Dodd (D-CT) also threw his support behind creation of the Consumer Financial Products Safety Commission.

The Administration is addressing the colossal failures that led to the economic crisis with a bold and aggressive plan, said Dodd. Creating an independent agency whose sole focus is protecting consumers - be it credit card holders, anyone with a bank account, or families with mortgages or student loans is really the key to creating the foundations for a stronger economy.

Dodd said banks that harm consumers with their policies do so at their own peril.

It is unbelievable that some of the same irresponsible actors that helped create the current financial mess would argue that we are doing too much for consumers, he said. Dont they realize that they need a healthy customer base if they want to continue to be successful?

But he American Bankers Association essentially says I told you so, noting the passage of the Credit Card Holders Bill of Rights in May is bringing about these changes.

The new legislation restricts the ability of credit card companies to price based on the individual risk of the customer, the ABA says in a statement. As a result, the system becomes a one-size-fits-all model, meaning that interest rates will likely increase for nearly everyone, including those with a good credit history, as those who successfully manage their credit will be subsidizing those who have not.

In this new environment, the bankers say, card limits will be lowered since lenders will be limited in managing risk going forward. Even customers that have a good credit score or have never missed a payment will likely see less credit available to them.

Congress Fumes Over Credit Card Rate Hikes...

FTC Says Calling Card Distributor Shortchanged Consumers

When you purchase a prepaid calling card, how closely do you measure the number of minutes? If the card is a 60-minute card, are you sure there are 60 minutes of time on it? There might not be.

A leading distributor of prepaid calling cards has agreed to pay $1.3 million to settle Federal Trade Commission charges that the calling cards failed to deliver the number of minutes advertised.

In tests conducted by the FTC, the calling cards on average provided less than half of the advertised calling minutes.

The settlement resolves a lawsuit the FTC filed in April 2008 against New Jersey-based Clifton Telecard Alliance One, LLC (CTA) and its owner, Mustafa Qattous.

The commission charged that the company misrepresented the number of calling minutes consumers would get with its calling cards, charged hidden fees, and failed to disclose that consumers cards would be charged whether or not the calls are connected.

CTA is a major player in the multi-billion dollar prepaid calling card industry. It markets cards under a variety of brand names, including African Dream and CTA Mexico, primarily to immigrants who rely on the cards to call friends and family in other countries.

The cards, sold through a large network of retailers, gas stations, and other outlets, come in denominations ranging from $2 to $20, and can be used to call hundreds of countries around the world. CTA also sells cards for domestic calling.

As part of the settlement announced, the court entered a judgment of $24.4 million against CTA, suspending all but $1.3 million of that amount. The settlement also bars CTA from misrepresenting the number of minutes of talk time a consumer will receive using a prepaid calling card.

The company is required to disclose to clearly and conspicuously any material limitations on the use of a prepaid calling card, including any fees or other charges.

The settlement is part of a continuing crackdown on fraud in the prepaid calling card industry. In February 2009, the FTC announced that another major group of major prepaid calling card companies agreed to pay $2.25 million to settle similar charges.

FTC Says Calling Card Distributor Shortchanged Consumers...

Credit Cards Giving Consumers Heartburn

By Mark Huffman and Martin H.Bosworth
ConsumerAffairs.com

June 30, 2009
After regulatory agencies adopted tougher rules on credit card companies and Congress passed the Credit Card Holders' Bill of Rights, the world was supposed to be better for consumers with credit card accounts.

But neither the new rules nor the new law take effect until next year, and if anything, credit card customers are even more miserable. While Chase customers are currently the most vociferous, other lenders are also drawing complaints.

Jacqueline, of Sacramento, says she had been paying nine percent on her Bank of America credit card for years, always paying on time. She says she considers herself "a good customer." Last week she was notified her nine percent rate was being raised to 25 percent. And that wasn't all.

"This was a high-limit card with a balance of $5000, but they then lowered my limit to just $200 above the balance owed on this card," she told ConsumerAffairs.com. "They gave me no notice of these actions and I could have easily gone over my limit by making one $200 purchase. I'm sick about this, they are ruining my credit and my husband and i are trying to buy a home."

Bank of America isn't the only lender raising rates. Hector, of Ventura, California, has a Capital One card.

"I opened my Capital One statement this morning to pay my July payment. I was shocked to see the interest rate skyrocketed from 9.90 percent to 17.90 percent," he told ConsumerAffairs.Com. "I called the customer service line and was told a notice was sent earlier this year about this change. However I never received a notice. He told me it was not for my performance but for economic times."

John, of Lexington, Kentucky started with an MBNA card at 7.99 percent, before the bank was acquired by Bank of America. After one payment the credit card company said was late, he says his rate for raised to 17.99 percent. That was four years ago, and at a rate of 17.99 percent you might not think John' would be in danger of having his rate raised. But you would be wrong.

"Even though we pay on time, they just raised the rate to 27.99 percent," John told Consumeraffairs.com. "They blame it on the government."

"Bad investments"

Banks may be acting now to maximize returns before new rules take effect that give consumers more leverage, though under the new law they still have the ability to raise rates when a payment is late. The fact that Chase this month has increased the monthly minimum payment for its customers with lifetime low rates allows the bank to regain money that is earning low rates and lend it out again at high rates. Should the higher rates cause some consumers to default, the low rates will go to 18 percent or higher.

Lauren Zeichner Bowne, staff attorney for Consumers' Union, confirmed that banks are raising rates, cutting credit lines and imposing more fees in order to "recoup from their bad investments and losses."

"We're also seeing signs of fees being raised on regular bank checking accounts," Zeichner Bowne said. "'Courtesy overdraft' fees are a huge profit center for banks, and we're hoping to get stronger regulations passed against them."

The new rules

Once the Credit Card Holders' Bill of Rights takes effect, credit card companies must live under these rules:

• Creditors cannot increase the annual percentage rate (APR) during the first 12 months of opening up an account.

• Creditors are required to provide consumers with a 45-day advance notice of changes in rates and significant contract changes. Rates that change due to a change in the index that the rate is based on are excluded from this 45-day notice requirement.

• Promotional rates need to be in effect for at least six months from the beginning date of that promotion.

• Creditors need to provide a 30-day advance notice of an account closure.

• With certain exceptions, credit card issuers are prohibited from charging a finance charge based on the double billing cycle method.

• Creditors are prohibited from charging a fee on an outstanding credit card balance at the end of the billing period if the fee is attributed to the interest accrued on an outstanding balance that was fully repaid during that preceding billing period.

• Consumers have the right to reject a new credit card after the creditor notifies a consumer reporting agency of its corresponding account.

• Creditors are required to remove information provided to a consumer reporting agency about newly established credit card accounts if the consumer has not used or activated the account and and if the consumer contacts the creditor within 45 days of its establishment to close it.

• If two or more different APRs apply to different portions of an outstanding balance, the amount of any payment above the required minimum payment needs to be applied to the balance with the highest APR first and then to lower APR balances.

• Creditors are required to provide a grace period for payments even if the cardholder takes advantage of a promotional rate balance or deferred interest rate balance.

• Creditors are required to send credit card statements at least 21 days before the due date of the outstanding balance.

• Creditors are prohibited from providing credit to consumers under age 18 (unless they are emancipated under state law, or the consumer's parent or legal guardian is designated as the primary account holder).

• For college students who do not have a co-signer, the maximum amount of credit extended will be limited to the greater of 20 percent of the student's annual gross income or $500 dollars. The aggregate amount of credit extended from all of their credit cards will be limited to 30 percent of the student's annual gross income (for the recently completed calendar year).

• Creditors are prohibited from opening a credit card account for any college student who does not have any verifiable annual gross income or already maintains a credit card account with that creditor, or any of its affiliates.

• Creditors are prohibited from charging a fee to make telephone and web-based payments. However, a fee may be charged for expedited telephone payments made on the due date or the day before the due date.

• Creditors are required to post their written credit card agreements on the Internet.

"Shine a light"

Until the new rules take effect, however, consumers are bluntly being told that the old rules apply. Zeichner Bowne said there was little customers could do, but there are a few options.

"The best thing you can do is pay the balance down as fast as you can," she said. "You could cancel the card, but that could do long-term damage to your credit rating. Paying it off on time, keeping your debt-to-credit ratio low — that's really the best option."

Cardholders who are suffering undue harassment or hardship can file a complaint with the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC), the federal agency most directly charged with overseeing consumer protection in the financial industry. The OCC has a dedicated Web site for consumers to file complaints against banks, although it's not easy to find on the OCC site.

"[Chase's policies] are the first big sign of systemic changes we're seeing since the regulations got passed," Zeichner Bowne said. "They'll be a big help, but until then, shining a light on these practices is very important."

Credit Cards Giving Consumers Heartburn...

Latest Chase Controversy Part of a Pattern

Chase is again under fire for what consumers are calling predatory and misleading practices regarding minimum payments, just five months after a lawsuit was filed accusing the company of reneging on promises made under its Balance Transfer Checks program.

Thousands of Chase credit card holders have been informed that their minimum payment is being raised from 2% to 5%. Chase blames the three-percent increase on the struggling economy.

Consumers affected by the increase all took advantage of a balance-transfer program that has already come under scrutiny in a number of lawsuits. In January, a class action lawsuit was filed in California on behalf of consumers who signed up for the Balance Transfer Program, which allows consumers to transfer outstanding debts to their new Chase credit cards. According to the suit, consumers were promised a fixed interest rate of between 2.99 and 4.99%.

In January, Chase began charging consumers a $10 service fee every month, and consumers who refused to pay found their interest rate raised to as high as 7.99%. Neither the service fee nor the interest rate increase was mentioned in the initial cardholder agreement.

In March, Chase reached an agreement with New York Attorney General Andrew Cuomo in which the company agreed to stop charging the $10 service fee targeted in the class action, and to refund over $4 million to affected consumers. According to the stipulation, over 300,000 consumers were affected nationwide.

Even loyal and conscientious Chase customers haven't been spared from increases that can prove devastating to their personal finances. Steve of Autryville, N.C., who saw his minimum payment go from 2% to 5%, writes, I don't know what I'm going to do, I'm only on Social Security and barely making it. I thought Chase was a good company, but they say there's no way to get out of paying the 5% now. I never missed a payment for over 12 years with them. I don't know what to do now.

I have always paid more than the monthly minimum due and always on time, writes J.W. of St. Charles, Missouri. I have carried the card for over 10 years and used the 'fixed rate of 3.99% for the life of the balance transfer' to reduce my unsecured debt (caused by medical expenses) in half. I mistakenly thought that this was a good company giving the average consumer an opportunity to manage financial difficulties responsibly. FAT CHANCE.

Another ruling

In case its reputation wasn't sufficiently tarnished, Chase lost another interest-related lawsuit last month. The Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ruled that Chase must clearly disclose that it might raise interest rates based on a consumer's credit history or other risk-related factors. That suit was brought by a Portland, Ore. couple whose interest rate was raised from nine to 24 percent in April 2005.

The suit accused Chase of violating the Truth in Lending Act (TILA) by failing to explain which factors the company used when deciding to raise the interest rate. TILA requires explicit disclosures regarding the terms surrounding a loan agreement.

The majority opinion conceded that credit card companies must be able to adjust APR rates based on consumer risk, but said that Chase buried the provision governing rate changes too deeply in the fine print. Specifically, the court noted that the disclosure came five dense pages after the disclosure of the APR. The court said that lenders must clearly and conspicuously disclose the reasons for which they might change a consumer's interest rate.

While TILA has been a major force in the credit card industry since its 1968 inception, recent legislation seeks to better ensure that disclosures are prominent and easy to understand. The Credit Card Accountability, Responsibility and Disclosure Act, signed into law by President Obama in May, was developed largely as a reaction to the financial crisis brought on by loans and mortgages given to high-risk consumers.

The law only allows lenders to raise interest rates if a cardholder submits a payment at least 60 days late. Moreover, if the borrower pays on schedule for the next six months, the lender is required to return the loan to its original APR. Justine Fischer, an attorney for the Oregon couple who claimed victory last month, said that Chase's conduct would likely be prohibited under the new law.

Additional suits relating to the balance transfer program have been filed in several other states, including Oregon.

More: Read verbatim complaints by Chase customers.

Latest Chase Controversy Part of a Pattern...

Chase Raises Minimum Payments On Credit Cards


Thousands of Chase credit card customers have gotten some bad news this month. The bank has informed them that the minimum monthly payment on their accounts is being raised from two percent of the balance to five percent.

That might not sound like a huge increase, but for many who are carrying large balances and are tightly budgeted, its a severe and unexpected blow. Kay, of Pottsville, Pennsylvania, said she contacted Chase and was told the change in policy was related to the poor economy.

I was told I could possibly re-negiotate a lesser monthly payment but my interest would go from 3.9 percent to 21.99 percent. I was told that out of over a billion credit card holders 850,000 were effected by this change, she told Consumeraffairs.com. My monthly payment from my four accounts will go from $961.00 a month to $2394.00 a month. Needless to say I will not be able to make these payments and will end up defaulting on my accounts and probably claim bankruptcy.

The change in minimum payment has little to do with how long customers have been Chase cardholders, or their credit ratings, though in an analysis of complaints to Consumeraffairs.com in the last few days, many customers do seem to have one thing in common. They all mention that they took advantage of a previous promotion and signed up for a Chase credit card, with the promise of a low, fixed rate for an extended period of time.

In the past year I took advantage of balance transfer offers with their life-of-the-loan low interest rate offers of 5.99 and 6.99, Wendy, of Cardiff By The Sea, California, told Consumeraffairs.com. I basically used the card as debt consolidation this year in lieu of the economy, wanting to close some other accounts and just use the Chase card to pay this amount down. I am horrified at the new five percent minimum! This will increase my payment by about $475 a month.

Dana of Dacula, Georgia, also took advantage of the promotion and transferred money to a Chase account at 4.9 percent. In August her minimum monthly payment goes from two percent to five percent.

This could put me in default since it would cause my payment to more than double each month, she told Consumeraffairs.com. I do not want to use the card, I just want to pay it with the terms I agreed to when the card was issued.

With new credit card rules on the way, thanks to changes by regulators and legislation passed by Congress, lenders are preparing for a new consumer lending environment. By increasing its minimum monthly payment for customers with low, fixed interest rates, Chase recovers that low-interest money faster, and can loan it out again at much higher rates.

The new credit card rules that go into effect next year prevent lenders from arbitrarily raising interest rates, but do not address the issue of minimum monthly payments. In fact, regulators in the past have encouraged lenders to increase the minimum payments, so that consumers pay down their balances faster.

But a number of consumers who thought they were doing the smart thing — transferring large balances to cards with locked in, low rates, are finding themselves in a trap. The increased minimum payment is now unaffordable. The price of keeping their payment the same is to give up that promised low rate, so that more of their monthly payment goes to interest each month, not paying down the principal.

Chase Raises Minimum Payments On Credit Cards...

Credit Card Delinquencies Up 11 Percent

June 9, 2009
Consumers fell behind on their credit card payments as the recession deepened in the first quarter of the year. For the first three months of 2009, 1.32 percent of consumers were three or more months behind on their credit card payments, up 11 percent over the same period in 2008, according to Trans Union, a credit reporting agency.

Information for the analysis is culled quarterly from approximately 27 million anonymous, individual credit files, providing a perspective on how U.S. consumers are managing their credit health.

Average bankcard borrower debt, defined as the aggregate balance on all bank-issued credit cards for an individual bankcard borrower, inched upward nationally 0.82 percent to $5,776 from the previous quarter's $5,729, and 4.09 percent compared to the first quarter of 2008. The highest state average bankcard debt remains in Alaska at $7,476, followed by Tennessee at $6,869 and Nevada at $6,677.

The lowest average bankcard debt was found in Iowa, at $4,300, followed by North Dakota with $4,414 and West Virginia with $4,640.

The steepest increases in average bankcard debt over the previous quarter occurred in Alabama , Mississippi and Tennessee. The District of Columbia experienced the largest drop in average bankcard debt, followed by the Wyoming and New Jersey.

"As expected, bankcard delinquencies increased in the first quarter both as a national average and in most areas of the country," said Ezra Becker, director of consulting and strategy in TransUnion's financial services group.

"As the recession entered its sixth quarter, we saw continued increases in average bankcard balances, as consumers struggled to meet repayment obligations in a job market that continues to deteriorate. This increase could be an indication that tax refund checks, typically used to pay down balances in during the first quarter in years past, are now being used to cover daily living expenses."

At end of the 2001 recession, the national bankcard delinquency rate had increased to a high of 1.69 percent, and as that recession came to a close in November of 2001, three of the five riskiest areas of the country in terms of bankcard delinquency were to be found in the South: North Carolina, Georgia, and South Carolina. In the current recession, Las Vegas, NV is leading in terms of bankcard delinquency, followed closely by Florida and California metros. Not surprisingly, all three states have led the nation in home foreclosures as well.

This highlights one of the fundamental differences between the two recessions -- the housing market, Becker said. Today, the least risky metropolitan area is Bismarck, N.D., with a credit card delinquency rate of 0.6 percent -- a position fairly consistent with what it held during the previous recession."

Credit Card Delinquencies Up 11 Percent...

Article Image

Obama Signs Credit Card Bill

By Truman Lewis
ConsumerAffairs.com

May 24, 2009
It's a victory some say is largely symbolic, but American consumers got a Memorial Day present from Congress and the Obama Administration: the Credit Card Accountability, Responsibility and Disclosure Act (CARD), signed into law by President Obama Friday afternoon.

Obama called the measure "common-sense reforms designed to protect consumers." It bans unfair rate increases, prevents unfair fee traps, requires plain language in plain sight for disclosures, increases accountability all around, and institutes protections for students and young people. The Federal Reserve had already ordered similar protections but its decree will not become effective until mid-2010.

President Obama and lawmakers applaud following his signing of the Credit Card Accountability, Responsibility and Disclosure Act. (White House photo)

Under the new law:

• credit card issuers will be required to tell card holders how long it will take to pay off a balance and what it will cost in interest if they only make the minimum monthly payments;

• retroactive rate hikes that appear on a bill "suddenly with no rhyme or reason" will be barred, Obama said;

• companies will have to post their agreements online;

• consumers will have to mail statements 21 days before payment is due, instead of 14;

• shifting payment dates will be prohibited; and

• 45 days' notice will be required for changes in terms and conditions.

More details are available on the White House Web site.

It's estimated that the average household debt by credit cardholders who carry a balance is around $17,000. The White House said that every year, Americans pay around $15 billion in penalty fees. Nearly 80 percent of American families have a credit card, and 44 percent of families carry a balance on their credit cards.

Obama said the changes were not intended to encourage reckless spending.

"We're not going to give people a free pass; we expect consumers to live within their means and pay what they owe. But we also expect financial institutions to act with the same sense of responsibility that the American people aspire to in their own lives," he said at the Rose Garden signing ceremony.

Reaction

Consumer activists generally applauded the measure while bankers said it would restrict credit available to consumers and slow the economic recovery.

"While even consumers who usually pay off their cards monthly are hit by unfair rate hikes and lowered credit limits, industry employs predatory tactics aimed at 'revolvers,'" the Center for Responsible Lending said in a statement.

Gun provision

Sen. Tom Coburn (R-Okla.) tacked on an unrelated provision that allows visitors to national parks and wildlife refuges to carry loaded weapons if they are already licensed to carry firearms. Congressional leaders decided not to contest the measure in order to meet Obama's request that the measure be ready for signing before Memorial Day.

Obama Signs Credit Card Bill: It's a victory some say is largely symbolic, but American consumers got a Memorial Day present from Congress and the Obama Ad...

Federal Court Reinstates Credit Card Suit

By Jon Hood
ConsumerAffairs.com

April 16, 2009
A federal court reinstated a consumer class action alleging violations of the Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act (FACTA), meaning the case will likely be heard by a jury. The suit alleges that vendors violated the Act by printing too much credit card information on consumers' receipts.

FACTA was passed in 2003 as an amendment to the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA). FCRA requires merchants to take certain steps to protect consumers' credit information. FACTA is aimed specifically at protecting identity theft, and provides that "no person that accepts credit cards or debit cards for the transaction of business shall print more than the last 5 digits of the card number or the expiration date upon any receipt provided to the cardholder ..."

The plaintiffs in the action, Bobbie Harris and Julie Best Grimes, originally filed separate suits against Mexican Specialty Foods, Inc. and Rave Motion Pictures, respectively. Both complaints requested class certification for a class action lawsuit. The suits defined putative classes consisting of every customer who used a credit or debit card at either merchant's location, and whose receipt included more than the last five digits of their credit card number.

The district court dismissed both actions, ruling that FCRA's damages provision is unconstitutionally vague and thus unenforceable. If a law does not sufficiently define a term or element of an offense, the statute's vagueness renders it unconstitutional. The reasoning behind this is that if a law does not adequately dictate which actions are illegal, people cannot be held to account for taking those actions.

FCRA allows plaintiffs to collect between $100 and $1,000 for "willful violations" of the law. The district court ruled that this provision was unconstitutionally vague because it provided no criteria to allow a judge how much to award a given plaintiff.

The Eleventh Circuit overturned the district court, ruling that the statute is not unconstitutionally vague. The court first noted that other laws, such as the Copyright Act, contain larger damage ranges that FCRA. Further, the court noted that the law sufficiently tells vendors which conduct is illegal (printing more than the last five digits of a credit card number).

The court further ruled that the law did not give juries an excessive amount of discretion in awarding damages, since it limited their awards within a $900 range.

In its ruling, the Eleventh Circuit vacated the district court's dismissal, and sent it back for further proceedings. As a result, Harris's and Grimes's lawsuits, which have since been consolidated, will likely be sent to a jury.

While FACTA originally held merchants liable for printing either more than five digits or the expiration date, they are now only liable for the former. In 2008, then-President Bush signed legislation exempting merchants from liability for simply printing credit card expiration dates on the receipt. The law applied retroactively, wiping out any suits involving illegal printing of expiration dates. Thus, for liability under the Act, a merchant must have printed more than the last five digits of a consumer's cardholder.

A federal court reinstated a consumer class action alleging violations of the Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act (FACTA), meaning the case will like...

Easter Surprise: Bank of America Raises Credit Card Interest Rates

As Congress mulls new restrictions on credit card issuers, Bank of America is raising interest rates on millions of its customers who routinely carry a balance on their credit cards, a move already taken by most other larger issuers but not one that goes down well with consumers.

Basically, BofA and other banks are penalizing customers who don't pay off their bills each month. It's a reversal of banks' usual practice. During normal economic times, bankers loathe customers who pay their balance each month, since by so doing they deprive the bank of the interest it would have earned on the unpaid balance. But now, with banks hoarding every cent, the worm has turned.

"The changes are extreme," said Jonathan of Hyde Park, Mass., one of hundreds of consumers who've complained to ConsumerAffairs.com. "My interest is doubling from 4.9% to 9.9%. My credit score is excellent and I have a perfect five-year history since opening this account. There is no reason for my rate to increase."

Starting with the June statements, stiff increases are being applied to customers whose interest rate has been below 10% and who carry a monthly balance, the bank said. Exact numbers aren't being released but estimates of consumers affected range as high as four million of Bank of America's 70 million credit card customers.

Other banks have already been down this road. Citigroup, Chase and America Express have all increase similar rate increases in recent months, as have many other smaller issuers. The banks are under increasing pressure because of rising delinquencies among their credit card customers -- but critics say that raising interest rates on good customers who pay their bills on time isn't the answer.

Evelyn of Willow Grove, Pa., was puzzled and angered when she got a letter informing her that her interest rate was going from 7.24% to 12.24%.

"As I have never been late and always make my payments on time and pay more than asked, I called to inquire about this significant jump in the interest rate. The representative tried to be as helpful as possible and advised that they are doing this increase due to the economy," Evelyn said. "What I don't seem to understand is if our economy is doing so poorly ... why are we penalized for paying our bills on time?"

Evelyn said the bank representative told her she could pay down the debt if she didn't want to pay the monthly interest, but she complained that curbing consumer spending does nothing to stimulate the economy. Consumer advocates generally recommend that, in similar situations, consumers should pay down their balance but not close the account, as doing so can damage their credit score.

New rules

New rules enacted by federal regulators in December limit banks' ability to raise credit card interest rates but the rules don't become effective until June 2010.

Legislation is being considered in Congress but separate House and Senate measures must be reconciled before the measures go any further. Banking industry lobbyists argue that the restrictions would inhibit banks' ability to manage risk and result in less, not more, consumer credit.

Tamara Draut, Vice President for Policy and Programs at Demos, a non-partisan policy center, says legislative action is all the more necessary because of the deepening recession.

In this tough time, it is unthinkable that credit card issuers would think of tightening their grip on the household pocketbook, but that's exactly what many have done in recent months -- capriciously raising fees and penalties, even as the government poured billions of dollars into them, she said.

But the American Bankers Association said it was disappointed by the Senate Banking Committee vote, and that passage of the bill would hurt consumers as much as it would banks.

"Credit cards provide access to credit for millions of Americans and small businesses every day. Making this credit available is a very risky business and the Committee's action today will unfortunately make it harder - not easier - for banks to continue doing so, said Kenneth J. Clayton, ABAs senior vice president, card policy. Credit card lenders of all sizes will likely have to pull back on providing reasonably-priced credit to a wide range of consumers and small businesses. It is hard to see how that makes good policy sense.

Sen. Chris Dodd (D-CT), sponsor of the bill, said the close committee vote indicated the bill may need modification to ensure passage by the full Senate. Similar legislation is currently making its way through the House of Representatives.

Easter Surprise: Bank of America Raises Credit Card Interest Rates...

Senate Committee Approves Credit Card Accountability Act

April 1, 2009
The U.S. Senate will vote on the Credit Card Accountability, Responsibility and Disclosure Act, a measure designed to end some of the credit card industrys more abusive practices.

The measure made it out of the Senate Banking Committee on a razor thin 12-11 vote.

The bill would:

• Protect consumers from "any time, any reason" interest rate increases and account changes;
• Prohibit unfair application of card payments;
• Protect cardholders who pay on time;
• Limit fees and penalties;
• Ensure that cardholders are informed of the terms of their account; and
• Protect young consumers from credit card solicitations.

Many of these same provisions were approved by government regulators late last year. However, backers of the legislation point out they dont take effect until mid 2010. In the meantime, they say, credit card companies are free to continue their present practices.

Tamara Draut, Vice President for Policy and Programs at Demos, a non-partisan policy center, says legislative action is all the more necessary because of the deepening recession.

In this tough time, it is unthinkable that credit card issuers would think of tightening their grip on the household pocketbook, but that's exactly what many have done in recent months -- capriciously raising fees and penalties, even as the government poured billions of dollars into them, she said.

But the American Bankers Association said it was disappointed by the Senate Banking Committee vote, and that passage of the bill would hurt consumers as much as it would banks.

"Credit cards provide access to credit for millions of Americans and small businesses every day. Making this credit available is a very risky business and the Committee's action today will unfortunately make it harder - not easier - for banks to continue doing so, said Kenneth J. Clayton, ABAs senior vice president, card policy. Credit card lenders of all sizes will likely have to pull back on providing reasonably-priced credit to a wide range of consumers and small businesses. It is hard to see how that makes good policy sense.

Sen. Chris Dodd (D-CT), sponsor of the bill, said the close committee vote indicated the bill may need modification to ensure passage by the full Senate. Similar legislation is currently making its way through the House of Representatives.

Senate Committee Approves Credit Card Accountability Act...

Chase to Refund $4.4 Million in Credit Card Fees

Chase Bank USA, the credit card-issuing subsidiary of J.P. Morgan Chase & Co., has agreed to stop charging a $10 per month service charge that it added to over 184,000 of its credit card accounts for customers who transferred balances to their Chase cards.

And as the result of an investigation by New York Attorney General Andrew M. Cuomo, the company has refunded or will refund approximately $4,400,000 to those consumers it had charged under a unilateral change in terms imposed in January.

Chase also faces at least one class-action lawsuit contesting the monthly charges.

Consumers across the U.S. carry over 100 million Chase credit cards. For a number of years, Chase has offered some of its cardholders very attractive promotional rates for balance transfers or other loan amounts put onto their Chase credit card accounts. The offers made clear that a one-time transaction fee, usually three percent, would be charged for this low promotional rate.

Despite the promises Chase made in its offer, in November 2008 Chase notified over 300,000 consumers nationwide, that the terms of the prior offer had been changed. Chase told its cardholders that, in January 2009, it would start charging an additional flat fee — a $10 service charge — each month. This extra $120 per year in additional fees significantly raised the effective APR on these balances, in some cases more than doubling the effective interest rate.

Among those complaining to ConsumerAffairs.com was Peter of Los Angeles: "Transferred balances to Chase at a low rate. Made all payments on time and above minimum. Suddenly found myself paying $10/month service fee forever whether I carry a balance or not, with no notification (but try to prove that you did not get a letter!!).

"The only explanation, 'We did not make enough money off you in the past, so we're making up for it,'" Peter said. "'You have a lifetime offer? Sorry, you just died!'"

In January of this year, responding to consumer complaints, Cuomo's office contacted Chase and requested a meeting with representatives to address these concerns. Upon meeting with Chase, the attorney general's office demanded that Chase cancel the $10 monthly service charges and refund all those that it had collected. On March 26th, Chase agreed to comply.

"My office will not sit back and allow banks to promise one thing in its solicitations and agreements with consumers, and then when times get tough, change the deal, leaving consumers holding the bag, said Cuomo. Truth-in-lending laws prohibit this very conduct. I am glad that Chase has now reconsidered its ill-advised, illegal decision, and will now live up to the terms it originally offered and agreed to.

Under the agreement, Chase will be sending out letters to consumers nationwide telling them that as of April 1, 2009, Chase will no longer be charging them the $10 monthly service charge.

In addition, Chase has refunded or will refund the service charges that it has been charging consumers for the last several months in total amount of approximately $4,400,000. In addition, these consumers will realize savings over the next 12 months of approximately $22,000,000.

Chase to Refund $4.4 Million in Credit Card Fees...

Judge Dismisses Amex Class Action

American Express has scored a big victory, turning aside a class action lawsuit by aggrieved cardholders who said they were scalped on travel insurance.

A California judge dismissed the case, ruling that the plaintiffs had failed to prove their case. The suit alleged that Amex cardholders who used their cards to buy airline tickets were overcharged for insurance, and that advertising about the program was misleading.

According to the suit, Amex tacked insurance costs onto any airline-related purchase in excess of $45, including things like baggage handling fees and seat upgrades. The plaintiffs argued that insurance should have been added only to ticket purchases. The plaintiffs also alleged that Amex failed to refund insurance to customers with airline tickets that were later cancelled, or to those who didnt quality for the insurance under its terms.

Amex countered that the contract explicitly disclosed the fees and the manner in which they were added to the bill.

According to Amex attorney David Shapiro, consumers could seek a refund of the fees by filling out a company-provided form or placing a phone call. In support of his claim, he cited data showing that about $140 million had been issued in refunds over the past 13 years.

After 11 weeks of testimony from the plaintiffs, California Superior Court judge George Hernandez ruled that the plaintiffs had not sustained their burden, and dismissed the case.

His decision was the second blow to the class; in February, he ruled that the contract outlining the insurance charges was unambiguous, thereby eliminating the plaintiffs claim for breach of contract. The judge noted that some class representatives had contacted Amex for refunds or credits, thus demonstrating their understanding that this term was a condition precedent to obtaining a refund. Last weeks ruling came at the end of the trials second phase, and turned aside the classs claims that the programs marketing campaign was deceptive.

The lawsuit was filed in 2001 on behalf of Amex cardholders who paid for the travel insurance between 1995 and 2008; the class consisted of about six million consumers. A related suit in the Eastern District of New York was stayed pending Judge Hernandezs ruling. The fate of that action remains unclear, although the courts decision likely doesnt give the consumer attorneys much reason to be optimistic.

Welcome respite

Judge Hernandezs ruling was surely a welcome respite for Amex, which has suffered a few adverse decisions in recent months.

In January, the Second Circuit ruled that the company couldnt necessarily enforce class action waivers against small merchants, if the vendors could prove that individual litigation would cost more than their potential recovery. Then a New Jersey court held that some class action waivers were unconscionable and thus unenforceable under New Jersey law.

The current case was unusual for two reasons. First, it was dismissed before Amex even presented its side of the story; the entire trial consisted of testimony from the plaintiffs. More significantly, very few class actions even go to trial in the first place; most settle out of court or are dismissed on summary judgment.

Indeed, a recent study found that less than one percent of class actions brought in California make it to trial. This suit was argued during a bench trial, or one decided solely by the judge; class actions can also be heard by juries, if the parties so choose.

American Express has scored a big victory, turning aside a class action lawsuit by aggrieved cardholders who said they were scalped on travel insurance....

Credit Card Reform Comes Back To Congress

The call to reform the most abusive and restrictive practices of the credit card industry was once again heard on Capitol Hill yesterday, as two separate hearings emphasized both the need for more oversight and new legislation to protect consumers.

The Senate Judiciary Committee convened a hearing over S. 2359, aka the "Consumer Credit Fairness Act," introduced by Senators Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI) and Dick Durbin (D-IL). The bill would, if made law, amend a portion of the 2005 bankruptcy legislation to enable consumers to divest a portion of their debt in bankruptcy.

Under the terms of the Act, if a filer's consumer debt threshold — including credit card debt, payday loans, or other debts — exceeded 15 percent plus current rates on 30-year Treasury bonds, they could have it liquidated in bankruptcy. The Act would also exempt filers with debt levels above the threshold from the "means test" mandated by the new bankruptcy law.

"The standard credit card agreement gives the lender the power to bleed their customers through evolving and ever more crafty tricks and traps," Whitehouse said in his opening statement. "The typical credit card agreement, which twenty years ago was a page in length, has grown to a 20-page, small print contract filled with legalese. In substance, it gives the companies the right to raise interest rates for almost any reason, and in some cases no reason at all."

The committee heard testimony from Douglas Corey, a Bank of America customer who had been paying his card debt on time for years, until he accidentally paid less than his normal minimum payment in August 2008. That triggered a spiral of rate increases and penalty fees that threatened to bury Corey under even more debt.

"With my next statement in October 2008 came the devastating news that my interest rate had skyrocketed to an astonishing 28.99 percent," Corey said. "I went from paying $360 in interest to $792 in one month and I was charged a $39 late payment fee. The following month, I was laid off from my sales representative position of seven years."

Corey's debt troubles increased to the point where he was missing payments on his mortgage, but, he said, he struggled to keep current on his loans. "Bank of America has come before you asking for help, understanding, and, with both hands open, for financial support," he said. "Yet when we the consumers go to these institutions looking for the same help, understanding and financial support, we get roughed up and receive no compassion."

Whitehouse introduced the Act in the previous session of Congress, but no action was taken on it. The House of Representatives passed the "Credit Cardholder's Bill of Rights" last year, but that bill did not come to the Senate for consideration. The House Financial Services Committee is expected to act on credit card legislation next week.

"It must do more"

Meanwhile, the House Subcommittee on Commerce, Trade, and Consumer Protection grilled new Federal Trade Commission (FTC) chairman Jon Leibowitz for what they perceived as the agency's failure to aggressively protect consumers from unscrupulous lending and punitive fees.

"These schemes were allowed to happen in part because of a fierce anti-regulatory ideology that was held by the Bush Administration," said Rep. Henry Waxman (D-CA), who said the opposition to regulation led to failures to protect citizens from tainted pet food to predatory mortgage lenders.

Leibowitz agreed, but said that his agency was often constrained by both its small numbers and lack of enforcement authority, as well as an inability to keep up with quickly evolving problems.

As is clear from recent experience, markets for financial services are complex and dynamic, changing in response to developments in the economy, technology, the law, and many other factors," Liebowitz said. "To remain an effective protector of and advocate for consumers of financial services, the FTC recognizes that the government must continually increase its knowledge of changing practices, evaluate its efforts, and modify its approach as needed."

Leibowitz recommended that Congress authorize it to use calls for public comment and rulemakings to declare certain business practices unethical, and to invest in the agency more enforcement power to obtain civil penalties against lawbreakers in federal court.

Credit Card Reform Comes Back To Congress...

American Express Safe from Class Actions? Court Says No

By Jon Hood
ConsumerAffairs.com

March 1, 2009
A federal appeals court has handed down a huge win for beleaguered consumers, rejecting American Expresss claim that they can prevent Garden Staters from bringing class actions against them.

The suit arose out of a promotion for the American Express Blue Cash Card, which claimed that consumers could earn up to 5% cash back on purchases made with the card. Lead plaintiff H.R. Homa brought a class action in New Jersey, claiming that the terms outlined in the promotion were misleading, and that he had not earned cash back as promised. The action was brought under the New Jersey Consumer Fraud Act.

The Blue Cash card agreement included a section prohibiting consumers from bringing class actions against American Express in the event of a dispute. The agreement also mandated that any disputes arising from the agreement would be governed by Utah state law, which conveniently recognizes all class-action waivers in consumer credit agreements.

The plaintiff, Homa, argued that New Jersey law should control, since the suit was brought under a New Jersey statute and the state refuses to enforce certain class-action waivers.

The court held that the provision acted as an "exculpatory clause," which essentially releases a party from liability arising from an agreement. These clauses often fall under the umbrella of contracts of adhesion, since the party against whom the clause is enforced has to either take the agreement as it is, or walk away altogether.

The court quoted New Jersey precedent conceding that, Ordinarily, when parties to a contract have agreed to be governed by the laws of a particular state, New Jersey courts will uphold the contractual choice if it does not violate New Jerseys public policy. The court ultimately sided with Homa, however, citing a 2006 New Jersey Supreme Court decision holding that certain class action waiver provisions were unconscionable.

In that case, Muhammad v. County Bank of Rehoboth Beach, the court asserted that, [t]he public interest at stake in [the ability of consumers] effectively to pursue their statutory rights under [New Jerseys] consumer protection laws overrides the defendants right to seek enforcement of the class-arbitration bar in their agreement.

In the Homa case, the court also noted that the Federal Arbitration Act provides that courts can refuse to enforce class action waivers if they violate a legal or equitable rule that would otherwise deem them revoked.

American Express had tried to argue that another Third Circuit decision, Gay v. CreditInform, compelled the court to uphold the class action waiver. In Gay, the court held as valid a clause preventing consumers from bringing class-action arbitration actions, or those held in a non-courtroom setting. The court distinguished the two cases, noting that Muhammad foreclosed all class actions, while the provision in Gay applied only to arbitrations; the former was unconscionable, since it deprive[d] Muhammad of the mechanism of a class-wide action, whether in arbitration or in court litigation.

Following from this logic, the court held that the American Express clause bears the hallmarks of a contract of adhesion — it was presented on a take-it-or-leave-it basis, in a standardized printed form, [and] without opportunity for the adhering party to negotiate except perhaps on a few particulars.

Turning the knife a bit further, the court held that New Jersey — not Utah — law would apply, as New Jersey had a materially greater interest in the outcome of the litigation. The court took pains to note the importance of New Jerseys interest in protecting its consumers ability to enforce their rights under the Consumer Fraud Act.

The decision could have an influence on other circuits presented with the same problem, given its application of general contract and conflict-of-laws principles. The opinion comes on the heels of another pro-consumer New Jersey decision — the states Supreme Court recently rebuffed a car dealers argument that a car buyer had to notify them of an overcharge before bringing suit.

American Express Safe from Class Actions? Court Says No...

Capital One Interest Rate Hikes Anger Customers

Consumers with good credit ratings take a lot of pride in their ranking, and don't take kindly to credit card companies taking actions that could negatively impact those credit scores.

So when credit card companies recently began to change the terms for many card holders, in advance of new government rules that would outlaw some of these changes, consumers have reacted with anger. Capital One is provoking some of the most heated reaction.

"I received a notice from Capital One Bank stating the 4.9 percent APR on the Mastercard I have had for six years will be increasing to 13.9 percent," Helen, of Boca Raton, Florida, told ConsumerAffairs.com. "I have always paid my bill in total and on time if not early. I called the customer service line and they very politely read the 'cue cards' stating it was a "business decision due to the current economy."

Helen wanted to know if Capital One could raise her rate for no reason. In fact, they can. After June 2010 they won't be able to do so under new rules adopted by the Federal Reserve, which may explain why they are doing so now.

Theresa of Richmond, Virginia, has a similar story. She said she recently received a "change in terms" notice on the Capital One card she had been using for seven years.

"The notice stated my rate is increasing from 8.9 percent to 17.9 percent with the option of opting out and having my account closed," she said. "I have a 790 FICO score and made large payments of my account every month. My current balance is only $700. I have never, ever been late on this account or any other account. I, like everyone else, was really angry when I received my notice."

Capital One, along with many other credit card companies, are reacting to the economy. Not only have they changed terms for delinquent customers, they are changing terms for some of their best customers who have very low rates.

Analysts say the companies are trying to offset current and anticipated losses from credit card delinquencies. Credit card delinquencies rose to record highs in January, according to Fitch Ratings. It reported payments more than 60 days late rose to 3.75 percent.

Consumers can call and complain to Capital One and other credit card issuers all they want, but the companies are unlikely to budge. They have concluded raising a nine percent rate to 18 percent is worth it, even if they end up losing the customer.

In late 2008, federal agencies announced new credit card rules that would prevent companies from taking some of the actions currently drawing complaints, but gave banks a year and a half to phase in the new rules. While applauding federal banking regulators for finalizing rules to curb some of the most abusive credit card lending practices, the Consumer Federation of America last December expressed concern that the requirements were too slow in taking effect. The group called on Congress to provide additional consumer protections to rein in abuses not addressed by the regulators.

"Federal regulators have taken an important first step to stop credit card companies from using hidden traps and tricks to drive up the amount of debt consumers owe," said Travis B. Plunkett, legislative director of the Consumer Federation of America. "However, it is not helpful to consumers struggling to pay off hefty debts in the middle of a recession, to give credit card companies the green light to continue to mislead and overcharge consumers for another year and a half."

Meanwhile, consumers continue to fume about their treatment. Philip, of Phoenix, notes that Capital One, which received government bailout money because of its poor business practices, is cutting him off, even though he has a high credit score and currently carries no balance on his Capital One card.

"This type of behavior from a company begging my government for money is appalling," he said. "They need customers like us to stay, not drive us away."

Consumers with good credit ratings take a lot of pride in their ranking, and don't take kindly to credit card companies taking actions that could negativel...

Credit Card Accountability Act Resurfaces in Senate

February 16, 2009
The Federal Reserve last year adopted new credit card rules that ban practices often cited as unfair to consumers, such as raising the interest rate on an existing credit card balance when the consumer is paying the credit card bill on time.

However, those rules don't go into effect until mid-2010, prompting Sen. Chris Dodd (D-CT), chairman of the Senate Committee on Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs to re-introduce the Credit Card Accountability, Responsibility and Disclosure Act. The measure was offered last week.

Tamara Draut, Vice President for Policy and Programs at Demos, which calls itself a non-partisan policy center, supports legislative measures to re-regulate the credit card industry and bolster the household economy.

"America's families are facing a dire economy, and this bill couldn't come at a better time," Draut said. "As the consequences of the subprime meltdown spread, banks are openly increasing interest rates and fees on their credit card customers in order to cover losses in other areas. The only reason this is possible is because in the absence of almost any regulation, issuers have tilted the playing field heavily in their favor."

Draut said the bill would level the playing field between borrower and lender by putting an end to some of the most arbitrary, abusive, and unfair credit card lending practices that trap consumers — particularly disadvantaged and minority borrowers-in an unending cycle of costly debt. The bill would:

• Protect consumers from "any time, any reason" interest rate increases and account changes;

• Prohibit unfair application of card payments;

• Protect cardholders who pay on time;

• Limit fees and penalties;

• Ensure that cardholders are informed of the terms of their account; and

• Protect young consumers from credit card solicitations.

"Demos research shows that inequitable credit card underwriting practices have shifted the cost of credit to individuals least able to afford it, while at the same time generating some of the highest profits in the entire banking sector," Draut said. "Low-income families and households of color, primarily African Americans and Latinos, bear the brunt of the cost of credit card deregulation through excessive fees and high interest rates."

Last fall, a similar measure known as H.R. 5244 in the 110th Congress, passed the House of Representatives in September 2008 with largely bipartisan support. The Senate, however, did not take up the bill before the session ended.

Although the Federal Reserve and other bank regulators issued a rule in December 2008 that would prohibit many of the same unfair practices, Draut notes the rule does not take effect until July 2010, giving credit card companies 18 months to proceed unchecked and delaying relief for millions of American consumers.

Credit Card Accountability Act Resurfaces in Senate...

Class Action Filed Over Chase Credit Card Fees

A class action filed in January alleges that Chase is forcing its customers to pay a "monthly service fee" and an increased monthly payment, without advance notification.

The suit concerns Chase's "Balance Transfer Checks," a tool that allows consumers to transfer outstanding balances to their Chase credit cards. The suit alleges that, under the balance transfer program, Chase promised a low annual percentage rate (APR) — typically between 2.99% and 4.99% — not subject to change for the life of the balance.

Beginning in January, however, Chase began slapping a $10 monthly "service fee" onto customers' bills. Consumers who refused to pay found their APR raised, sometimes to as high as 7.99%. Moreover, Chase asserts the right to again unilaterally raise the rate again after a year.

According to the suit, filed in federal court in California, neither the possibility of a monthly fee nor an arbitrary APR increase was mentioned in the cardholder agreement that customers signed when they first received the card. Although the agreement provides for APR increases in certain circumstances — for example, if the customer misses a payment or fails to maintain a certain balance — members of the class had their rates raised despite having met all of their obligations.

The suit further claims that customers who call Chase to inquire about the fee are given no information whatsoever, either as to the purpose of the charge or how it is calculated. The only way for customers to avoid paying the charge is to agree to the APR increase.

The practice is especially damaging to consumers given the nature of the balance transfer program, which is aimed at those who are struggling to pay existing balances on other credit cards, usually at a higher interest rate than that promised by Chase. As described on Chase's website, balance transfer cards are "a great way to simplify your finances. Plus, you can often save money on interest charges if you carry a large balance on a credit card with a higher rate."

Many affected consumers are finding themselves right back where they started when they signed up, or worse. Calvin G. of Brookings, SD says: "I was finally seeing the light at the end of the tunnel, but it just got a little darker again. I find this practice of theirs a total sham, especially to card members who are in good standing. Told the customer rep that I guess they can pretty much do whatever they want and she had no response."

The lawsuit alleges several counts, including violations of the Truth in Lending Act, which requires lenders to clearly spell out terms and conditions in the initial agreement; breach of contract; and unfair competition.

Class Action Filed Over Chase Credit Card Fees...

House Passes Credit Cardholder's Bill Of Rights



The House of Representatives today passed by a large margin legislation designed to protect consumers from abusive lending practices of credit card companies.

HR 5244, "The Credit Cardholder's Bill of Rights Act," passed the House 312-112, with 228 Democrats and 84 Republicans voting to support it. 111 Republicans and one Democrat voted against the bill, which now goes to the Senate.

Chances for passage of the legislation in the Senate this term are mixed, as the legislative calendar is shortened due to the 2008 Presidential election campaign, and the proposed $700 billion bailout of the financial system by Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson is taking center stage.

Supporters of the bill used the proposed bailout as a backdrop to justify passing stronger laws to protect bank customers from the more underhanded tactics of the financial industry. The legislation would prohibit:

• Bait-and-switch interest rate and fee hikes for any or no reason at all during the life of the card;

• Assessing hidden and unfair interest rate charges by charging interest on balances already paid off;

• Unjustifiably maximizing interest charges by requiring consumers to pay off balances with lower interest rates before those with higher rates;

• Charging late fees when consumers mail their payments seven days in advance of the due date;

• Applying certain unfair interest rate hikes retroactively to balances incurred under the old rate.

"We are providing a $700 billion bailout for banks--how can we not provide even the most basic protections for Main Street?," said bill author and sponsor Rep. Carolyn Maloney (D-NY).

Consumer advocates hailed the passage of the bill as a big step forward for protecting American livelihoods. "[This] bill would curb some of the most arbitrary, abusive, and unfair credit card lending practices that trap consumers in a vicious cycle of debt," said Travis Plunkett of the Consumer Federation of America.

"We urge the Senate to include credit card reform as part of legislation it passes to rescue banking firms," Plunkett said. "Cash-strapped consumers shouldn't continue to be gouged by excessive credit card rates and fees by many of the same financial institutions that will benefit from the bailout."

Opponents of the bill claimed that its passage would cause banks to reduce available credit lines and raise interest rates at a time when the worsening economy has Americans increasingly reliant on credit cards to pay for everyday expenses.

"If creditors cannot properly price credit for riskier consumers, some creditors may make the entirely rational decision of withholding credit from the higher-risk consumers altogether," according to one Republican insider. "The people whom this bill purports to protect--those with imperfect credit histories and young people or new market entrants without much of a credit history--will be those who find it most difficult to get credit under this legislation."

But supporters pointed out that banks are raising interest rates and fees on even their best cardholders, simply to earn more profits and maintain a cushion of revenue as the economy continues to falter.

"Consumers in perfectly good standing with their credit card company are understandably outraged when that company hikes their interest rate based on information unrelated to the card," said Pamela Banks of Consumers Union. "But it's even more outrageous to apply this type of rate increase to credit card debt already borrowed at the lower rate."

Tamara Drout of the nonpartisan policy research center Demos pointed out that the costs of America's credit card debt are borne excessively by African-American and Latino households. "Over 90 percent of African-American families earning between $10,000 and $24,999 had credit card debt," Drout said.

"Meanwhile, only 7 percent of white cardholders are charged interest rates over 20 percent, but 15 percent of African-American cardholders and 13 percent of Latino cardholders pay such rates," Drout said.

"Credit card issuers have not learned the lessons of the mortgage crisis," said Lauren Saunders of the National Consumer Law Center. "It is both unfair to consumers and irresponsible banking to lure people in with deceptively low rates and then, once they have incurred a large balance, explode their interest rates."

House Passes Credit Cardholder's Bill Of Rights...

New College Students Face Money Management Challenges


Whether or not economics 101 is on their course schedule, most college freshmen get a quick lesson in finance, and not all of them get a passing grade. And some learn the hard way about the dangers of credit cards.

Doug Borkowski, director of Iowa State University's Financial Counseling Clinic, says students should do a little prudent planning before using a credit card. In his face-to-face meetings with ISU students regarding their financial matters, he often tells them to start the planning process by making a budget and tracking spending for at least a month.

"They need to know what they are spending their money on," he said. "This is the start of a budget. Now they have some more accurate numbers to work with."

He says setting goals related to finances is also very important.

"It certainly can help to show how saving to make a purchase -- and not just spending impulsively -- can help in the long run," he said.

Borkowski says students have to also understand wants versus needs.

"If you are considering buying something, ask yourself, 'Do I need it or is it just a want?' Do not buy it right at that moment," he said. "Leave the store and think about it and see if you decide to come back and purchase the item at a later date."

Borkowski advises students to use a debit card first, when it is not a line of credit, to see how they can manage their spending habits. "If you overspend with a debit card and get an overdraft, you are not ready for a credit card," he said.

Since most people find it harder to actually hand over the money rather than just swipe a credit card, he recommends that students try cash first instead of plastic.

"I have found that if a young person understands that the same amount of money they pay every month for a minimum payment on their credit card could potentially make them a millionaire by the time they reach 65, they might think twice about using that credit card," he said.

And once parents send their kids off to school, they're not excused from the money management education discussion.

"Parents need to take the time to talk to their children," Borkowski said. "If parents are spenders, they should tell their children 'You do not want to live paycheck to paycheck like we do.' If they are savers, let them know how that has worked for them."

Borkowski says that students need to be educated to the fact that if they have too much credit card debt or miss credit card payments, they can ruin their credit scores and have a very difficult road to credit repair over their lifetime.

"A bad credit score can mean not being able to buy a car or home. It also can mean higher interest rates and future credit costing you more," he said. "I think the credit card issue is about scaring students some, but still letting them know that when they are used properly, credit cards can be a good financial tool."

New College Students Face Money Management Challenges...

How Are You at Managing Your Credit Score?

With credit markets still in turmoil, and lenders getting stingier by the day, keeping your credit score as high as possible is becoming more and more important. It impacts on your ability to get a mortgage and even on your chance to get any kind of loan or credit at reasonable rates.

Some wireless providers are checking your credit rating to determine what kind of agreement they will offer you. Meanwhile, more and more employers are starting to look at your credit scores as part of the hiring process. It's just as important these days to manage what you owe as it is to manage what you own.

What is your credit score?

According to a recent survey sponsored by the Consumer Federation of America and Washington Mutual, more than two-thirds of all Americans don't even understand what a credit score means. Basically, your credit score measures the probability that you'll repay a loan. The higher your score, the more likely it is that you will repay your lenders.

The most popular credit rating is the FICO score. FICO stands for Fair Isaac Credit Organizations and it was one of the first firms to institute a credit rating system. FICO scores range from 300 for the worst score to 850 for the best with the median score for consumers at 723.

Your credit score is based on five categories:

• Repayment history, including whether or not you have been late on any payments

• Total amount of debt

• Length of credit history

• Type of credit such as secured debt like mortgages or unsecured like credit cards

• How frequently you borrow

With FICO, the first three categories make up 80 percent of your score. That means if you have a short credit history, even one late payment on a credit card will impact your score greater than if you have a long credit account.

How do I manage my credit card debt?

Like anything else, it helps to have a plan. Create a chart showing the total balance on your credit cards and the minimum monthly payments for each card. Now you may want to pay off the smallest balance first just to give yourself a feeling of accomplishment. But it may make more sense to pay off the cards with the highest interest rates first. Each time you pay off a credit card, add the amount you had been paying to the monthly payments on the remaining cards and continue this until all accounts are paid off in full.

Although each credit card requires a minimum monthly payment, you should pay more, otherwise it will take years and years to pay off the debt and your interest charges will more than double what you paid for your original purchase. Also, try to stop making any new charges until you have paid off all your accumulated debt. If you can't stop totally, reduce it as much as possible.

It's also a good credit management strategy to avoid getting too close to your credit card limit. In fact, most experts suggest keeping your balances less than 30 percent of your credit limit. There are two things you can do if you go over that 30 percent. Pay down your balance or call your issuer and ask for a higher credit limit. But be careful that you don't see that as an open invitation to charge more just because you have a higher credit limit.

Should I apply for new credit cards?

There are situations in which taking on new credit cards could be a good idea. For example, if the cards you had that were once zero interest cards have now popped up into double digit interest rates, it's time to find a better rate. Or if you have several credit cards, you can consolidate these into one low-rate card. Some of the more competitive deals include the Virgin Credit Card, which has a 15-month introductory interest-free balance transfer period, with a debt transfer fee of 2.98 percent. Barclays has a range of cards offering 14 months interest free with a 2.9 percent transfer charge.

Taking on new borrowing - and managing it well - can actually improve your credit score, especially if your credit history includes late payments. But there's a catch. The rate you are offered will depend on your credit score and these good rates are for those with high credit scores. So if you are unlikely to be accepted for these low rates, don't even apply. If you make a number of applications for credit within a short space of time, it will have a negative impact on your credit score.

How do I fix bad credit scores?

Before you can begin repairing a low credit score, you have to get a copy of your credit report just to see what you have to do to improve it. You can do this online by contacting one of three major credit bureau such as Experian, Equifax, or Trans Union. You can also get credit reports for free once a year by visiting the AnnualCreditReport.com Web site. Checking your own reports has no impact on your credit score, and you should check your reports at least once a year to look over your credit usage.

Experts agree that the best way to increase a credit score is to consistently pay bills on time. Late payments can haunt your credit file for up to seven years. One way to make sure this doesn't happen is to set up direct debits.

If you've fallen into that unfortunate category of borrowers who have failed to keep up with with their bills and debt repayments to the point that lenders will have nothing more to do with you, thus denying you the chance to even repair your credit score, you may want to consider a "secured" credit card. This gives you a chance to build up a payment history by borrowing up to the amount you paid into the account. Just make sure the company offering the secured card reports to the credit bureaus, because if it doesn't then it will have no impact on your report. A secured credit card means that you're basically borrowing against your own money because you have put into an account the money that you are borrowing against. It's something in between a debit card and a credit card but it could be a way to demonstrate that you can manage your credit more responsibly.

Improving a poor credit score may take some time, but it is definitely time well spent. Better credit scores will get you better rates on everything from a mortgage to car loans or credit cards, on your existing debt or on any credit you wish to apply for in the future.

How Are You at Managing Your Credit Score?...

House Committee to Consider Landmark Credit Card Legislation

July 30, 2008
As a Congressional committee prepared to consider legislation that would curb predatory credit card lending practices, national consumer organizations called on members of the House Financial Services Committee to support the bill and to send it to the floor for passage.

The Consumer Federation of America and Consumers Union said that the Credit Card Bill of Rights Act (H.R. 5244), introduced by Representative Carolyn Maloney (D-NY), would end credit card issuers' abusive lending practices at a time when the American economy is being pummeled by the collapse of another industry based on unsavory lending: the sub-prime housing market.

The proposal requires credit card companies to stop the following practices:

• Applying unfair interest rate hikes retroactively to balances incurred under the old rate;

• Assessing hidden and unjustified interest charges on balances already paid off;

• Piling on the debt that consumers owe by requiring them to pay off balances with lower interest rates before those with higher rates;

• Charging late fees even though consumers mail their payments seven days in advance of the due date.

"The fact that a House committee will be considering this legislation shows that Congress is taking a strong stand against the traps and tricks that many credit card companies use to increase their profits at the expense of financially vulnerable consumers," said Travis B. Plunkett, of the Consumer Federation of America. "We applaud Representative Maloney for introducing this important bill and urge the members of the House Financial Services Committee to vote for it."

"Consumers in perfectly good standing with their credit card company are understandably outraged when that company hikes their interest rate based on information unrelated to the card," said Pamela Banks of Consumers Union. "But it's even more outrageous to apply this type of rate increase to credit card debt already borrowed at the lower rate."

Although some credit card companies have disavowed the practice of increasing interest rates for consumers in good standing based on other unrelated credit behavior, such as a drop in their credit score, many still engage in it.

The practice, known as "universal default", dramatically increases the cost of purchases made when the lower rate was in effect, and leads to higher minimum payments and longer payoff periods even if the consumer makes no further charges. The legislation prohibits retroactive application of any interest rate hike based on behavior unrelated to the credit card or to actions related to the card, unless the consumer is more than 30 days late.

The legislation prohibits two types of unfair and hidden interest rate charges. It prohibits credit card companies from using "double-cycle billing" to charge interest on balances repaid during the grace period.

The legislation also requires issuers to apply payments proportionately to card balances with different interest rates. When consumers accept card offers or cash advances with short-term teaser rates and higher rates for other balances, credit card companies apply payments first to the lower-rate balance, allowing other balances to build up at the much higher interest rate. The practice creates a far higher effective interest rate than consumers expect.

The legislation provides that consumers demonstrating payment 7 days before the due date are presumed to have paid on time and cannot be charged a late fee. It also sets a single uniform time by which payments must be received on the due date to prevent companies from setting earlier and arbitrary deadlines that result in late fees. Issuers also must mail credit card bills 25 days before the bill is due, instead of the current rule requiring only 14 days, to help ensure that consumers will have enough time to pay.

House Committee to Consider Landmark Credit Card Legislation...

30,000 Consumers Weigh in on Abusive Credit Card Practices

By Joseph S. Enoch
ConsumerAffairs.com

July 24, 2008

More than 30,000 consumers have deluged the Federal Reserve Board's public comment system with opinions on the agency's upcoming proposed rulemaking that addresses abusive credit card practices, according to the Consumer Federation of America.

"The federal regulators have gotten the message from consumers that the banks are using unfair practices to make bad money on top of good money," Ed Mierzwinski, consumer program director for the not-for-profit consumer advocacy group U.S. Public Interest Research Group, said in an older prepared statement. "These rules will ban some of the unfair tactics that hurt American families."

The proposed rules are the first of their kind, said Travis Plunkett, legislative director for the not-for-profit Consumer Federation of America.

"This is the first time ever that a federal agency or Congress have decided to reign in the questionable credit card industry practices," Plunkett said.

Among the 12 items in the proposal are rules that would: prohibit rate increases to existing balances, increase the payment period, prohibit two-cycle billing and adjust the allocation of payments so that in the instance a consumer has two balances with a credit card company, the creditor cannot apply payments solely to the balance with the lower interest rate.

First step

"It's a good first step ... but there are a whole host of problems in the credit card market that are not addressed," Plunkett said. "For instance, reckless extension of credit to young people, to college students in particular, (and) high fees or fees that are assessed unfairly."

Some other credit abuses, such as the prevalence of extending credit to college students, have supporting legislation pending in Congress.

Although this is the first move of this kind by the government, Plunkett said last year the Federal Reserve implemented new rules to help educate consumers on credit abuses.

"They are improving credit card disclosures," Plunkett said. "But if the practice is abusive, merely telling somebody about it before you do it is not fair.

"Certain practices are by definition unfair and deceptive and should be restricted and prohibited and the Federal Reserve has finally come to that conclusion."

Personal pleas

Of the 30,000 comments, more than 12,000 are personal pleas from consumers acting on their own while about 19,000 other Americans have submitted form letters distributed by consumer advocacy groups and the credit industry.

This is the second largest number of public comments the Federal Reserve has ever received, trailing the reform of the mortgage brokers, Plunkett said.

The public comment period ends August 4, 2008.

Consumers who wish to air their grievances with the Federal Reserve can do so by e-mailing directly to regs.comments@federalreserve.gov and mentioning Docket No. R-1314 in the subject line.

The Board hopes to finalize the rulemaking by the end of the year, Plunkett said.

Although the outpouring of support for the rules is positive, Plunkett said the rules are far from law.

"They're under enormous pressure from the credit card companies to make this a weaker rule," he said.

Citibank, which has been at the center of many Congressional hearings for its abusive practices, did not return a phone call seeking comment.

30,000 Consumers Weigh in on Abusive Credit Card Practices...

Patients 'Overdose' on Medical Debt


The people who brought you the housing market collapse may be about to do the same thing for health care financing.

Some of the biggest names in the consumer credit business, including GE Money, Citigroup, and Chase, are pushing risky credit for financing medical procedures, according to the latest issue of Consumer Reports, which describes the new lending practices as akin to subprime mortgages.

Plastic is playing an increasing role in covering medical costs: at about $45 billion today, it could more than triple to $150 billion in 2015, the magazine says.

Overdose of debt

CR's July report, "Overdose of Debt," explains how credit cards and finance lines that are "interest free" can easily reach exorbitant rates -- up to 27.99 percent retroactively -- and they're being pitched to consumers with high pressure sales pitches, often catching them off guard in their doctors' offices or at the hospital.

The rise in doctors promoting cards and loans with unconscionable finance terms, says Consumer Reports, is cause for concern, blurring traditional lines of responsibility.

With consumers already sagging under record debt loads and soaring out-of-pocket medical costs, consumers likely will come under more pressure to pay for these expenses with credit cards or loans. What they may not understand, according to CR, is that many of these financing schemes carry dangerous pitfalls.

Big market

Lenders tout their offers as a way for patients to cover medical needs or elective procedures and they push risky credit for everything from cancer care to root canals to botox treatment. Meanwhile, the cards and financing are promoted to doctors, dentists, and veterinarians as a way for them to make more money and get paid promptly.

In addition, CR reports, hospitals are checking credit scores of patients and some are even offering their own cobranded credit cards.

But for consumers, these financing plans can turn out to be the medical equivalent of subprime mortgages, according to medical and credit experts CR spoke to.

They may appear attractive: Medical credit lines of up to $40,000 are being offered with no interest if the balance is paid off within the promotion time. If consumers fail to pay off some loans within the promotion time or miss a payment, they can be hit with retroactive interest rates of up to 27.99 percent.

Doctors or partners?

"Consumers have to be wary," said CR senior editor Andrea Rock. "Often they're in a vulnerable position when they receive these sales pitches in a doctor's office or a hospital - and they don't understand what they're signing up for. Furthermore, some consumers have said that they felt pressured by their medical providers while sedated or recovering from treatment."

By persuading patients to use these financing plans, doctors, dentists and hospitals benefit because they get paid right away. In fact, doctors and dentists have financial incentives under these arrangements to encourage patients to sign up for more expensive treatments and to steer them to extending financing plans that take a smaller cut of the practitioner's fee.

For example, if a patient were to finance $1,000 worth of dental work through GE Money CareCredit, the dentist would be paid by GE Money, minus 13.5 percent of the total as a "processing fee." Usually such fees for merchants are 2 percent or less.

But if the patient opted for a two-to-five-year plan, CareCredit would take only 5 percent of the dentist's fee, and the patient would pay an initial annual interest rate of 11.9 percent that could rise to 23.9 percent if he or she failed to pay the balance on time.

When hospitals persuade patients to pay for care with a credit card or loan, patients lose their power to bargain for discounts or even obtain charity care. "Ask questions first," Rock said. "It's always better to negotiate directly with the hospital."

In fact, as noted in CR's consumer tips, once a patient has paid an out-of-pocket medical bill with a loan or credit card, they lose their ability to negotiate the repayment amount and terms.

What to do

Consumers should be aware that hospitals are required by federal law to provide care in a medical emergency. But patients should not let themselves be pressured into using a credit card or loan to pay for out-of-pocket medical costs. Once they do, they lose their ability to negotiate the repayment amount and terms.

CR offers the following tips:

• Consumers should find out whether they qualify for free or discounted care from their hospital.

• When negotiating discounts or any payment terms, consumers should ask to speak to the manager of patient accounts, and get any agreements in writing.

• By paying at the time of service, providers may be willing to cut consumers' bills by more than 50 percent to avoid the expense of billing.

• Although hospitals generally structure payment plans for 24 months or less, consumers should try to negotiate a longer term if necessary to ensure that they can afford the monthly payment.

• Hospital billing errors are common. Consumers should always ask for an itemized bill and check it for accuracy.

• If consumers must rely on credit, they should shop for the best general-purpose credit card, ideally one with a low rate that can be locked in for the life of the balance.

Patients 'Overdose' on Medical Debt...

Floating Due Date Snags Chase, Citibank Customers


Consumers complain that Chase and Citibank are routinely changing the due dates on their statements from month to month, often making customers with automatic payments late, thereby saddling them with late fees and higher interest rates.

(Citibank) moved my due date to cause me to be late and give them the ability to charge a late fee and move my rate from 3.99% (for the life of the balance) to 24.44%, wrote Jeff of Noblesville, Ind. I have always paid electronically on the 24th. ... It sent my monthly bill for Citibank from $211 to $495.

While the exact numbers are difficult to quantify, ConsumerAffairs.com has found numerous complaints, some going back as far as 2001. Consumer advocates say the banks' tactics are greedy, unnecessary and more than coincidence.

The consumer groups all agree this is a serious problem. We all get complaints about it, said Ed Mierzwinski, consumer director at the U.S. Public Interest Research Group, a nonprofit consumer advocacy organization.

It's really too bad because this likely affects consumers with serious debt, said Norma Garcia, senior attorney with the Consumers Union, the nonprofit publisher of Consumer Reports. If it's through autopay they're likely trying to resolve their debt through their bank.

Common practice

It is common for the credit card companies to change due dates as much as six days or more from month to month according to Mierzwinski and to consumer complaints.

For the first time that I can recall in 14 years of using my Chase MasterCard, they decided to change the due date making it several days SOONER than it used to be, from approximately the 20th to the 14th, wrote Karen of Middlefield, Ohio.

Mierzwinski said the companies frequently use the excuse of operating on a fixed 30 or 31-day schedule regardless of the actual length of the month. But he said that doesn't explain why there are often six days or more of a discrepancy from one month to the next.

I don't know of anyone that has a 35-day month followed by a 25-day month, he said.

The credit card companies advertise the ability to choose your due date as a service to their customers, but most of the complaints ConsumerAffairs.com received are from consumers who chose a particular date, only to have the bank fail to honor it.

The benefit of that offer would be undone if they changed the date without the consumer's consent, Garcia said.

Sara of Brooklyn, N.Y. had to cancel her Chase credit card when three months in a row she asked for a due date of the 19th and three months in a row her due date was the 13th.

I am still being expected to pay my $29 late fee, Sara wrote.

Chase responds

Chase aims to make it easy for our customers to do business with us, Chase representative Megan Stinson wrote in an e-mail. We offer flexible payment methods for customers and the ability for them to choose their payment due date to help them better manage their finances.

When an account is opened, it is clearly disclosed that the payment due date may vary slightly, by up to five days, from statement to statement depending upon the number of days in the month, Stinson continued. This information is also communicated to our customers when they request a new payment due date, whether that is online or with a Chase representative.

However, Stinson did not answer many of ConsumerAffairs.com's specific questions including why Chase does this, how long it has been doing it and how consumers can get their money and lower interest rates back.

Citibank is mum

For two days, Citibank representative Samuel Wang promised to answer ConsumerAffairs.com's questions but did not do so and now is not returning e-mails or phone calls.

ConsumerAffairs.com could find no similar complaints involving other large credit card companies.

Floating Due Date Snags Chase, Citibank Customers...

Congress Takes On Credit Card Interchange Fees


For years, retailers and merchants have been waging a quiet war with the financial industry over "interchange fees" -- the hidden costs of processing credit and debit card transactions that can wipe out a store's profits while earning banks a pretty penny.

Now Congress has stepped into the fracas with new legislation that would enable merchants to negotiate the fees they pay for taking plastic.

The "Credit Card Fair Fee Act of 2008," introduced by House Judiciary Committee chairman John Conyers (D-MI), would require lenders possessing "substantial market power" to negotiate with merchants and retailers on terms for fees paid when processing card transactions.

If a voluntary agreement cannot be reached, both sides would have to submit to binding arbitration overseen by the Justice Department and the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).

"This legislation is intended to give merchants a seat at the table in the determination of these fees," Conyers said. "It is not an attempt at regulating the industry and does not mandate any particular outcome. This legislation simply enhances competition by allowing merchants to negotiate with the dominant banks for the terms and rates of the fees."

Utah Republican Chris Cannon, who co-sponsored the legislation, said that the bill was designed to reinforce transparency and competition in the credit card industry, two principles key to what he called "the greatest economic system in the world -- free-market capitalism."

"The current system of setting fees that merchants pay for credit card transactions is anti-competitive and secretive," he said. "This bill does not set prices. Instead, it would require that fees be set in a transparent manner so other companies can compete for business and consumers would not pay artificially high rates."

Consumers are generally unaware of interchange fees, as they are folded into the total price of items bought and are not disclosed on receipts. But merchants are acutely aware of the fees, as they force storeowners and retailers to raise prices on all their items in order to make a profit, effectively penalizing customers who shop only with cash and don't pay fees of any kind.

$350 per family

Interchange fees cost the average American family $350 per year, according to statistics from the National Retail Federation (NRF). Americans pay interchange fees of two percent on all transactions made with plastic, higher than any industrialized nation in the world.

Visa and Mastercard kept their interchange fee structure hidden for many years, preventing merchants from accurately gauging how much they are really paying, and leading a group of merchants to file a class-action lawsuit demanding changes to the system. Both Visa and Mastercard have since published their fee breakdowns, although critics charge the structures are still too complex for anyone to understand.

Both Visa and Mastercard have set aside considerable war chests to pay for the potential costs of losing the litigation, and have committed to massive initial public offerings (IPOs) in order to defray more risk onto shareholders.

Retailers testified to Congress in July 2007 on the hidden penalties of interchange fees, and today welcomed the new legislation. "This legislation would use the nation's antitrust laws to rein in the greed of the credit card companies," NRF senior vice-president Mallory Duncan said.

"Rather than allowing these fees to continue to be set in secret and imposed on a take it or leave it basis, this legislation would require negotiations and allow retailers to seek fair terms and conditions that will ultimately mean a better deal for consumers," Duncan said.

"Consumers are already angry at the way they've been treated by credit card companies, and this bill is an important step toward making credit card companies treat both merchants and their customers with respect."

Congress Takes On Credit Card Interchange Fees...

Credit Card Defaults On The Rise

Subprime mortgages have led to a wave of home foreclosures as thousands of homeowners have defaulted on their payments. Don't look now, but the same thing may be happening in the credit card market.

Within a 24-hour period this week, two giants in the consumer credit industry have raised storm warnings.

Capital One Financial Corp., the largest independent credit card issuer in the U.S. reports rapidly rising losses from consumers unable to pay their credit card bills.

"On a managed basis, the fourth quarter 2007 provision for loan losses was approximately $1.9 billion," Capital One said in a statement. "This is comprised of approximately $1.3 billion in charge-offs and an allowance build of about $650 million. The allowance build reflects fourth quarter delinquencies in the company's national consumer lending businesses, continued deterioration in the approximately $700 million Held for Investment portfolio of Home Equity Lines Of Credit originated by GreenPoint Mortgage, and expectations for a weaker U.S. economy in 2008, as evidenced in recently released economic indicators."

American Express, once a card targeted to the most creditworthy consumers, said it would write off a $440 million loss in the fourth quarter of 2007, partly because so many cardholders are failing to pay their debts. The company also said a slowing in cardmember spending contributed to the writedown.

American Express said it expects to report overall growth in worldwide cardmember spending of about 16 percent for the fourth quarter. The growth rate, however, trailed off to 13 percent in December with particular weakness in U.S. billings.

The company also said it expects to report that delinquencies in U.S. loans increased to approximately 3.2 percent in the fourth quarter of 2007 from 2.9 percent in the third quarter, and that the write-off rate in this portfolio increased to approximately 4.3 percent from 3.7 percent for the same periods.

As home prices surged during the real estate boom of 2003-2005, many homeowners tapped equity in the form of loans to finance major purchases and other consumer spending. With that money machine effectively shut down, many economists have worried that strapped homeowners would next max out their credit cards to remain afloat.

Credit Card Defaults On The Rise...

Chase to Stop Raising Rates Based On Credit Reports

If you're a Chase customer you may be tired of seeing your credit card rate skyrocket if you miss a payment on your other bills -- even if you pay your credit card in full each month.

Well, good news.

Chase Card services says it will end the practice of raising customers' interest rates based on credit report information, beginning in March 2008.

Chase Card Services CEO Gordon Smith announced the change as part of Chase's "Clear And Simple" plan, designed to "build lasting, loyal relationships between ourselves and our customers."

The practice of using missed bill payments as an excuse to trigger interest rate hikes -- commonly referred to as "universal default" -- is widespread throughout the credit industry.

Consumer advocates have long criticized the practice as unfair, noting that missing a single bill payment does not immediately indicate financial irresponsibility, and that positive bill-paying records were not used to raise a customer's credit score.

Although Chase ended its usage of universal default in 2005, it continued to monitor credit reports and scores for excuses to raise interest rates. Under the new system, a Chase customer will only get hit with a rate hike if they make late payments, go over their balance limit, or bounce payments.

Curtis Arnold, founder of credit card comparison site Cardratings.com, called the change "a major step forward for consumers." "I commend Chase for being serious about making their cards more consumer friendly," wrote Arnold on the CreditBloggers personal finance blog.

Chase's move follows a similar action by Citigroup, which announced in March that it was ending its practice of "universal default" and "any-time-for-any-reason" rate increases.

The industry's sudden consumer-friendliness is widely perceived as an effort to fight off further regulation by Congress. The Senate held hearings on abusive credit card practices in March 2007 and threatened to more closely scrutinize lenders.

Two Senators introduced legislation in May that would prohibit punitive fees levied on cardholders and restrict charging of interest on fees for certain transactions.

Chase to Stop Raising Rates Based On Credit Reports...

Canadians Crushed By Credit Card Debt

The U.S. isn't the only nation buried by massive consumer debt.

Several recent studies have found that many Canadians are struggling with tens of thousands of dollars in credit card debt, and 90 percent of those surveyed felt that they were deeper in debt than they were five years ago.

One survey of 4,000 Canadians found that 28 percent of the respondents had no idea what the interest rate on their credit card was; 25 percent of the respondents had consumer debt between $10,000 and $40,000, not counting debt from mortgages; 53 percent of Canadians surveyed said they had no budget for their income.

The top worry for the survey participants was having money saved for emergencies, but 53 percent of the respondents felt they would be able to retire between 60 and 65, despite having little or no money saved.

The surveys were conducted as part of "Credit Education Week," a nationwide event from November 13 to 16, co-sponsored by the global financial industry and Credit Canada, a nonprofit credit counseling service.

The findings substantiate the need for greater education on key personal finance issues including credit, savings, and retirement planning, said Credit Canada's Laurie Campbell.

It is critical for Canadians to have the knowledge and capacity to effectively manage their finances today in order to plan for and build a stronger future.

A study released in October by the Lafferty Group found that while Canadians had fewer credit cards, less debt on their credit cards, and paid their balances in full more regularly than Americans, the number of credit cards in Canada overall actually increased by 7 percent over the previous three years, compared to a yearly one percent decline for American credit cards.

Canada In Crisis

Although the slide of the American dollar against the Canadian loonie has boosted the spending power of Canada's consumers, the country is by no means insulated from the meltdown of the mortgage market and corresponding credit crunch.

The Financial Post reported this week that Canada's major banks were quietly cutting the discount rate on mortgages sold at "prime" interest rates, shoring up bank profits by passing increased costs on to the homeowner.

The Post quoted Monster Mortgage vice-president Vince Gaetano as saying "The banks are going to make their profits somewhere and that's what they are doing."

Royal Bank of Canada, the country's biggest bank, said Tuesday that it would take a fourth-quarter loss of 160 million Canadian dollars, or $167.3 million, as a result of its holdings in securities bolstered by U.S. mortgages. The Bank of Nova Scotia quickly followed suit with an announcement that it was writing down $135 million ($141 million in American dollars) as a result of exposure to the subprime mortgage market.

Canadians Crushed By Credit Card Debt...

Macy's Customers Get New Citicards--Like It Or Not

Macy's shoppers who had store credit card accounts are reporting an unwelcome surprise in their mailboxes--their cards have been converted into Citibank Mastercards, with different credit limits and interest rates, all without the consent of the cardholders.

ConsumerAffairs.com reader Robert H. from New Hampshire wrote in to report that he "[r]eceived a legitimate Mastercard in the mail ... with just an activation phone call. This card was not ordered by me ... I never heard of a bank mailing credit cards in the mail for immediate use without ordering or comfirming with the bank or credit company."

Citigroup recently acquired the credit services division of the Macy's department store chain, and proceeded to "flip" the inactive store credit accounts of 3.5 million customers into true credit cards.

According to Citigroup and Macy's officials, a notice was sent to the accountholders in August informing them of the change and giving them until August 10 to call a toll-free number or write in to "opt out" and cancel the card. If the customer did not opt out, their Macy's store card account was canceled and replaced with the new card.

The new accounts have to be canceled through Citibank, not Macy's, irking cardholders who never wanted to receive the cards in the first place.

"At first I worried that someone had used my personal info to request the card, but then I noticed the message that reads 'If you do not want the CitMasterCard, call 800-432-0282 and we will close your account,' " wrote Margaret from Watertown, Massachusetts.

"How dare they send me an unrequested credit card in the mail, and then tell me I have to call if I want to cancel! With all the identity and credit card theft today, how can a bank do this? This is wrong and dangerous!"

Banks and other lenders typically perform "soft" inquiries into a person's credit in order to "prescreen" them for a potential credit offer, which is where the bulk of credit card solicitations in your mailbox come from.

According to Emily Davidson of Credit.com, in order to issue these cards, Citibank may have made a "hard" inquiry into accountholders' reports, which could lower their overall credit score.

"This case is unique in that the credit card issuer ran a hard inquiry and issued a real card without the consumer's direct approval," Davidson said. "I haven't seen physical evidence of the hard inquiry yet, but the reports coming in have mentioned this as part of the process. Any hard inquiry can cause some drop in credit scores."

Credit scores are measured in part by a borrower's overall credit history. The more credit a borrower has for a longer period of time, the higher their score is.

Canceling an old account and replacing it with a new one can also lower their credit score by reducing their length of credit history. This is a further turn of the screw for the unsuspecting new cardholders, as they will have to call in to cancel new accounts opened in their name, which may lower their credit score even further.

In addition, although the new cards require calling in to Citibank and answering a security question to activate, even inactive credit cards represent a vulnerability to identity theft and fraud, particularly if an unsuspecting recipient throws the card away. Unsolicited new cards arriving in the mail are themselves a sign of identity theft, as they may indicate a thief has stolen a cardholder's personal information and is using it to open new accounts.

What You Can Do



Let the companies know you're mad. Citibank's toll-free customer service line is 1-866-510-2761. Call the bank and let them know you're angry that your information was used to make a new credit inquiry without your consent. Although Macy's is no longer responsible for the accounts, if you want to call them and offer a piece of your mind, the company's customer service number is 1-800-BUY-MACY (1-800-289-6229).

Set up a credit freeze. The best way to block new accounts being opened in your name and without your consent is to freeze your credit. The three major credit bureaus are now offering credit freezes in all 50 states. 39 states and the District of Columbia already have laws enabling consumers to freeze their credit and unlock it, sometimes for as little as $5.

Opt out. Put yourself on the Opt-Out list to reduce the frequency of your information being shared between companies and affiliates. Whenever you open an account, be sure to read the store agreement for language permitting your information to be shared between the company and its partners. To opt out of receiving unsolicited credit card offers, visit the official Opt-Out Web site or call 1-888-567-8688.

Macy's Customers Get New Citicards--Like It Or Not...

Capital One Hikes Interest Rates, Agrees to Disclose Credit Limits

Like a three-card-monte dealer, Capital One is enticing consumers hoping to better their credit scores while jacking up interest rates for its long-time customers, even those with sterling credit and a good repayment record.p>

Capital One says it will begin reporting its cardholders' credit limits to the three national credit bureaus -- a step that could boost the FICO credit scores of some of its 50 million customers by 40 to 80 points or more within a few months.

The higher FICO scores would allow Capital One cardholders to qualify for lower mortgage interest rates when they buy or refinance homes and, one would think, help them get or retain a low interest rate on their credit card.

Not so.

Over the last few months, Capital One cardholders have been receiving notices that their interest rate is going up -- way up.

"I have had a Capital One credit card for over 5 years that was supposed to be fixed at 9.9% FOR LIFE. Now they tell me they are changing it to 15.49% variable. Did I die or something?" Galen of McMinnville, Ore., complained to ConsumerAffairs.com.

Galen's complaint is similar to those of hundreds of other consumers who received an impersonal card telling them that, for business reasons, Capital One was raising their interest rate.

The notice makes no attempt to appear personalized and does not imply the customer is at fault. It's strictly a "business decision," the card states.

"I have never been late, always paid well above the minimum every month and considered them a reputable company," Galen said. "What's in my wallet? Certainly not Capital One from now on. I just pulled my $15K balance and put it in B of A at 2.99% for the next few months."

Galen is not alone. Many of the affected consumers have shown no hesitation in dropping Capital One and successfully applying for a card from another bank.

An attorney who frequently writes for ConsumerAffairs.com had the same experience. She promptly applied for, and received, an Advanta card with 0% interest for 15 months and 7.99% thereafter. But, having read the fine print, she selected a pair of shoes from the Capital One premium catalog before canceling her account.

FICO Fuss

Whether or not Capitol One's sudden change of heart regarding credit scores was motivated by its desire to counter the uproar over its sudden interest rate hikes, the decision resolve an issue that has irked consumer advocates for years.

Capital One has long been pilloried for withholding its customers' credit limits in its regular reports to Equifax, Experian and TransUnion, the three national credit bureaus.

Many cardholders aren't aware of it but their credit scores can be artificially depressed if creditors do not report their maximum credit limits. That's because Fair Isaac assigns a heavy weight -- 30 percent of a person's entire score -- to what is known as "utilization" of available credit.

In other words, those who have a high credit limit but don't actually charge all that much would get a higher FICO score than those who are chronically bumping into their ceiling.

If Capital One hoped consumer advocates would bury it in garlands, the response may have been disappointing. The typical reaction could be summed up as, "About time."

Or, as Travis Plunkett, legislative director for the Consumer Federation of America, said in a San Francisco Chronicle article, it's a shame that "so many people were put at a disadvantage by their own credit card company."

Capital One Hikes Interest Rates, Agrees to Disclose Credit Limits...

Wedding Bill Blues

When Robin Catesby and her husband Dave were planning their wedding, they made a deliberate choice to make the big day as low-cost as possible.

"He was in culinary school at the time and we knew we'd have big student loan bills after he graduated, so we opted for an almost entirely do-it-yourself wedding and stayed well within our tiny budget," Catesby said.

Dave's sister, on the other hand, went for a huge, fancy wedding with all the trimmings.

"We never heard the exact figures, but it sounded like [his sister's] wedding ran toward the $15-20K mark," said Catesby, currently a graphic designer in Portland, Oregon. "They were very much taken in by all the glitz and foofery."

Catesby's story is typical of many young marrieds these days. Enticed by visions of fairytale celebrations with expensive and lavish settings, many couples are racking up huge debt in the name of the perfect day -- and unlike previous generations, parents are no longer shouldering the burden as much as they once did, so wedding expenses are increasingly being picked up by credit cards.

The result, according to Consolidated Credit Counseling Services (CCCS) founder Howard Dvorkin, is an average wedding debt of $25,000.

"And when you factor in penalties and interest, and if they only make the minimum payment, we're talking debt levels of $100,000 or more over the life of the debt -- that'll take longer to pay off than most marriages last!"

Great Expectations

Dvorkin founded CCCS to help consumers deal with crushing debt from various sources and get their financial lives on track. Increasingly, that involves paying off huge credit card debts resulting from lavish weddings.

"The idea of parents paying for the big day just isn't a reality any more," he said. "The culture pushes this idea that women, in particular, should have this one perfect day so much that they'll do anything to get it. I don't think many really realize what running up that kind of debt means."

Abigail G., an educator from Netcong, New Jersey, agrees with Dvorkin's assessment.

"Many little girls dream of their weddings and as the media feeds us all the stories of insanely expensive celebrity bashes, young women -- and some young men as well -- get this idea into their heads that the wedding day has to include a long list of very expensive things," she said.

"Most people don't have the kind of wealth it takes to put on a wedding like we see in movies or on TV shows, and credit cards make it all too easy to purchase the illusion of it -- at a very high price down the line."

TheKnot.com, a site devoted to wedding planning and preparation, frequently conducts surveys of its members to find their primary stresses when it comes to the big day.

In a survey for Bank of America in 2004, 70 percent of TheKnot.com respondents planned to spend $10,000 or more on their wedding, and 15 percent planned to put the costs on their credit cards.

In another survey conducted for American Express in August 2006, TheKnot.com surveyed 500 newlyweds found that 80 percent named "money" as their prime source of stress from the wedding; 14 percent of the respondents admitted to going over the budget limits they'd set for the wedding.

American Express conducted the survey as part of the launch of its credit card co-branded with TheKnot.com, specifically designed to cut costs on wedding-related purchases.

Dvorkin emphasized that much of the problem was cultural.

"Men, we really don't care. Just give us a few beers and we're happy," he joked. "But women get it drilled into them that this is their big day, and that they need to show off their catch to their friends and their family, and their family's friends, and so on."

Interestingly, Dvorkin noted that it's the wives who most often come to use his service, as they tend to be more pragmatic and upfront about dealing with the spiraling debt problem.

"Men tend to stick their heads in the sand and hope everything'll be okay," he said. "The women I've encountered are much more like, 'Hey, we got a problem.'"

Cut the Costs Before Cutting the Cake

Everyone we spoke with for this article said the same thing when asked how to prevent credit card debt from weddings -- stick to your budget and be creative and cheap.

"If you can't afford a $25,000 wedding, don't have one," Dvorkin said. "I've had two weddings myself. I know from experience that you can have a great day without breaking the bank."

CCCS provides a "wedding planner brochure" that details potential costs couples can run into when planning for a wedding, and suggestions to avoid them. The advice includes:

Start saving immediately. Put aside 15-20% of your combined disposable income into a high-yield savings account, or open a Certificate of Deposit (CD) to get more interest off the money you've already saved, and use that to cover the heaviest wedding costs.

Be creative. Dvorkin's tips include having weddings in public parks and beaches, or during the morning or afternoon, rather than renting out expensive halls for the evening. Couples can design their own invitations, bake their own wedding cakes, and craft their own floral arrangements and even wedding gowns to save money.

Keep it simple. Invite your family and your closest friends, but draw the line at your sister's friend's cousin. Set limits on who can be invited and who can't, and stick to them.

Outside the Loop

Stefanie from Lisle, Illinois, is currently planning her wedding to her longtime boyfriend, and was "shocked by the complexity and costs" of everything that came with the wedding day. "Both of us wanted a downtown Chicago wedding," she said.

"After we started seeing the quotes (plates starting at $160.00, plus 20% gratutity, and over 10% for tax), we had to reconsider a Chicago wedding. We could have used our credit cards and we could have gotten a loan but the idea of being in that much unsecured debt for one day was not some thing we wanted. So instead we found a nice place in the suburbs of Chicago."

"Do your research. Get quotes, compare, and interview your vendors," Stefanie said. "Consider carefully what you want to purchase so you are not stuck with $200 of silk flowers or 50 vases you have no intention of using."

There were things Stefanie didn't want to scrimp on, such as the wedding photographer, and as she says, "ultimately it's up to the couple to decide what's important to them."

Anjie K. from Frederick, Maryland, foreswore a traditional expensive wedding in favor of a simple ceremony in front of a fireplace.

"We spent maybe $85 for the day (license, fee, and lunch) and at the end of the day, we were married just as legally as if we'd done the fairytale thing," she said.

"If we had it to do over again, I'd do it the exact same way. It was a beautiful day done our way, and our credit thanked us."

Wedding Bill Blues: Enticed by visions of fairytale celebrations with expensive and lavish settings, many couples are racking up huge debt in the name of t...

For Rent: Your Credit Score


The all-important three-digit number known as your credit score has become the central pivot on which the financial industry moves.

Borrowers are repeatedly told to demonstrate good financial behavior not just for its own sake, but to ensure that their credit score stays high enough to receive approval from lenders. And a score that doesn't meet with lenders' approval can keep otherwise responsible borrowers from getting a home or car loan for years.

So it should come as no surprise that companies like InstantCreditBuilders.com (ICB) and Addatradeline.com have devised a way to game the system -- in this case, by paying people with high credit scores to let low scorers "piggyback" on their ratings and receive boosts to their own scores as a result.

The new trick takes advantage of a loophole in the credit system. People who have little or no credit histories, such as college students, can be added as an "authorized user" to credit cards that are ultimately paid for by Mom and Dad.

In this case, the "authorized user" with good credit is paid several hundred dollars to "rent" their credit score out to someone else, with the agency taking their cut from the potential piggybacker.

Lenders Object

Although the Federal Trade Commission has been taking a wait-and-see approach to the issue, the financial and mortgage industries are already on the warpath.

The National Association of Mortgage Brokers (NAMB) is planning to release a statement opposing the practice. Mortgage lenders say the practice undermines the trust lenders place in the FICO score, which is by far the most widely-used scoring system for new loan approvals.

"We have become so dependent on FICO scoring that we rely on it almost to the point that FICO is the decisionmaking process," Bremer Mortgage president Jim Miley told the Minneapolis Star-Tribune. "If we can't get assurances that FICO scores are accurate, then we will definitely go back to manual underwriting of loans, a time-consuming and expensive process."

Unforeseen Consequences

Fair Isaac, creators of the FICO score, has said that it will close the "authorized user" loophole in its credit scoring model to protect against "piggybacking." John Ulzheimer of Credit.com says that the move is going to "screw consumers royally."

"A lot of people are going to get penalized for something a few bad apples did," Ulzheimer said in an interview with ConsumerAffairs.com. "The value of any authorized user on a credit card is now totally lost."

Ulzheimer said that anyone who has built a credit history as an additional user on a card, ranging from college students to married couples and divorcees, will have to "rush out" and open up new credit accounts to rebuild or maintain their scores and credit histories.

"It won't be as big a rush as people filing bankruptcy before the new laws took effect," Ulzheimer said, "But you'll see it happen."

Ulzheimer, who formerly worked at both Fair Isaac and Equifax, said companies like ICB are liable for enforcement under the Credit Repair Organizations Act (CROA), which mandates the rules that so-called "credit repair organizations" work under. "The minute they take money in advance, they're liable under CROA," he said. "This is a case of merchants ripping off businesses, and some consumers ripping off lenders."

Bad Data

FICO became dominant largely because it streamlined the formerly cumbersome and detailed process of lending down to a simple number.

Whereas local credit bureaus and mortgage lenders would previously look at a person's entire financial history and make calls based on individual judgment, the modern system relies almost totally on the proprietary algorithm developed by Fair Isaac, and based on information in credit reports that is very often inaccurate.

The ease with which credit could be approved led to an explosion of availability of lending to people who would not ordinarily have qualified, but the mania to approve credit and sell reports and scores to lenders also led to constant errors and mistakes in reports that are very difficult to correct.

Now the housing market is in the doldrums, thanks to subprime loans going into default and foreclosure accross the country. Even the Federal Reserve is reconsidering the easy access to credit that consumers have come to take for granted.

And the closing of the "authorized user" loophole won't just make building credit tougher for consumers -- it's exposed a vulnerability in the FICO score that has competitors like the credit bureau-backed VantageScore ready to pounce.

John Ulzheimer had previously criticized the new score, which is sold right from the three bureaus, as "an effort to confuse consumers and unsophisticated lenders."

Now, he said, "I wouldn't be surprised if there was an all-hands meeting at VantageScore Solutions to discuss what to do" about the loophole in the FICO score. "They're licking their chops."

For Rent: Your Credit Score...

Senate Bill Would Curb Abusive Credit Card Practices

By Martin H. Bosworth
ConsumerAffairs.com

May 16, 2007
Two Democratic Senators have introduced legislation that they say would rein in the most abusive practices of the credit card industry by limiting interest rate hikes and curbing punitive fees that can prevent consumers from ever paying off their debt.

The "Stop Unfair Practices In Credit Cards Act" was introduced on May 15 by Senators Carl Levin (D-MI) and Claire McCaskill (D-MO).

Credit card issuers too often sock consumers with sky-high interest rates and excessive fees, making it harder and harder for families to climb out of debt, Levin said. The goal of this legislation is to put an end to unfair and abusive credit card practices that outrage so many American families."

"We have to fight for those who have not hired dozens of lobbyists to make sure that American consumers are not getting ripped off and are fully informed of how these companies are manipulating their financial security," McCaskill said.

The act's provisions include:

• Prohibiting interest charges on any portion of a credit card debt which the card holder paid on time during a grace period.

• Prohibiting added "trailing interest" charges on credit card debt which the card holder paid on time and in full.

• Preventing the charging of interest on credit card transaction fees, such as late fees and over-the-limit fees.

• Restricting the charging of repeated overlimit fees for a single instance of exceeding a credit card limit.

The bill also requires that cardholder payments be automatically directed to the credit line with the highest balance, and prevents fees from being levied if a payment was late due to a card issuer's action.

The Consumer Federation of America's Travis Plunkett called the act important legislation will stop credit card companies from using a variety of traps and tricks that harm consumers and illegitimately pump up profits.

Owning a credit card company is often a license to steal," said Ed Mierzwinski of U.S. PIRG, "But Senator Levins legislation makes him the new sheriff in town. His bill bans some of the most unfair credit card company practices that strip money out of consumer pocketbooks and wallets.

Levin chairs the Permanent Investigations Subcommittee, which McCaskill serves on, and held hearings earlier in the year blasting banks and credit card issuers for inscrutable agreements, cryptic practices, and sky-high interest rates.

Representatives from Bank of America and JP Morgan Chase were thoroughly grilled on their business practices during the hearing, with many promising to end practices such as "universal default" in order to avoid regulatory action.

Levin had earlier requested a report from the Government Accountability Office (GAO) on credit card fees and disclosure statements. The GAO report found that penalty fees for credit cards had nearly doubled from $13 in 1995 to $34 in 2005, and that credit card disclosures were written at a level much higher than the average American could understand, with important information often buried deep in agreements that readers would miss.

Senate Bill Would Curb Abusive Credit Card Practices...

Bank of America Offering Credit Cards to Undocumented Immigrants

Bank of America has begun quietly offering credit cards to customers in the Los Angeles are who don't have a Social Security number, The Wall Street Journalreports. Such persons are usually undocumented immigrants.

The newspaper said that Bank of America, the country's second-largest bank, is offering credit cards to consumers who have had an account at the bank for three months or more, even if they do not have a credit history or Social Security number.

It's the latest indication that American financial institutions are serious about doing business with the millions of undocumented immigrants who until recently have had no access to such routine services as checking accounts, credit cards, home mortgages and personal loans.

The newspaper said that Bank of America tested the program at five branches in Los Angeles last year and has now expanded it to 51 additonal branches in Los Angeles County, thought to have the largest concentration of undocumented workers and illegal immigrants in the U.S.

It said the bank hopes to roll the program out nationally later this year.

The credit cards won't be cheap. They carry a high interest rate, typically about 21 percent, and an annual fee, but they do offer a way for non-citizens to build a credit history so that they can purchase cars, homes and other big ticket items on credit.

There is nothing illegal about the practice, Bank of America said. But critics say a major bank should not be helping people who violate immigration laws.

"They are clearly crossing the line; they are actually aiding and abetting people who broke the law," said a spokesman for the Federation for American Immigration Reform.

To review applicants, Bank of America is using a procedure called "judgmental lending," pioneered by MBNA Corp., the credit card giant acquired by the Charlotte-based Bank of America last year. Instead of using credit reports, bank employees make subjective judgments based on their personal observation of the customer.

Bank of America Offering Credit Cards to Undocumented Immigrants...

Congress Targets Credit Card Companies For Reform


After years of having its way with American consumers, the multibillion-dollar credit card business may soon face greater oversight and tighter reins.

"I would like to put the credit card industry, issuing banks and card associations on notice," said Sen. Chris Dodd (D-CT), chairman of the Senate Banking Committee.

"If you currently engage in any business practice that you would be ashamed to discuss before this Committee, I would strongly encourage you to cease and desist that practice."

The committee recently heard testimony from experts on both sides of the credit card reform debate, including Harvard Law professor and bankruptcy expert Elizabeth Warren.

Warren was a staunch foe of the new bankruptcy law, which makes it much harder for consumers to discharge credit card debt.

"A growing number of card issuers increase their profits by loading their credit cards with tricks and traps so that they can catch consumers who stumble or mistake those traps for treasure and find themselves caught in a snare from which they cannot escape," Warren said in her testimony.

"The credit card market is broken, and consumers pay a steep price in this non-functioning market. But it doesn't have to be this way."

Big Fees, Big Business

Witnesses cited a number of instances in which the credit card industry makes its profit through penalizing its customers. Chief among them was the practice of levying fees for just about every transaction -- even charging interest on balances already paid.

Travis Plunkett, director of the Consumer Federation of America (CFA), pointed out that penalty fees for late payments have not only risen in volume, but "have become primarily a revenue enhancer for credit card issuers," he said.

Credit card companies charge fees for things such as paying bills over the phone, which can cost the consumer an average of $5 to $15 per transaction.

Plunkett and several other witnesses referenced a recent study by the Government Accountability Office (GAO) that found credit card fees had tripled in the past ten years, from an average of $13 in 1995 to $34 in 2005.

The report found a 110 percent increase in charging "overlimit fees," when a customer carries a balance higher than their credit limit.

"These monthly fees are charged every month a consumer carries a credit balance higher than their credit limit," Plunkett said. "Critics of this practice argue that issuers should not assess a penalty fee when they can simply enforce the credit limit if they wish to prevent consumers from exceeding it."

In Plain English

Another big target was the complexity of credit card disclosure statements. Prof. Warren noted that the average disclosure statement grew from one page in the late 1980's to "more than 30 pages of incomprehensible text."

"Anyone who has ever tried to read a credit card agreement knows that the terms are simply incomprehensible," Warren said. "The inserts sent along with monthly bills to amend the card agreements are filled with language even a lawyer would have difficulty parsing."

MSN Money columnist Liz Pulliam-Weston recently discussed the practice of not even disclosing the card's actual interest rate until the applicant has been approved for it.

This could lead to cardholders playing "Russian roulette" when selecting a credit card, as they might end up agreeing to an interest rate of 30 percent or higher without their knowledge.

"If you have a good credit history, you should get a good rate, not one that's been inflated to cover the risks of others who haven't been as responsible," she said in a recent column.

The Interchange Wars

Another hidden fee that traps consumers is one they never hear about at all -- the "interchange fee" that retailers pay to process transactions made with credit cards.

Merchants have been waging war with the credit and banking industries to disclose and standardize these fees, which they say amount to a "hidden tax" on consumers.

In his opening statement, Dodd specifically targeted interchange fees as "opaque" costs which "are passed on, in part or whole, to consumers who have no knowledge or understanding that a fee is even a part of the cost of bread or milk, or any other consumer product."

Dodd noted that interchange fees net between $30 and $40 billion for the credit industry annually.

The Merchants Payments Coalition, a trade association of businesses opposed to interchange fees, hailed Dodd's statement.

"The credit card companies have long profited from placing hidden fees and practices on unsuspecting merchants and consumers," they said in a statement. "The interchange fee is the biggest fee consumers have never heard of and accounts for more than the total of all other consumer fees such as late fees and over-the-limit fees."

Over the Top

Most of all, the expert witnesses emphasized the willingness of banks to lend to just about anyone as a prime reason for the explosion in consumer credit card debt.

Travis Plunkett noted that as consumers cut down on their total credit card balances, the industry responds with ever-more-aggressive marketing, usually through direct mail solicitations.

"CardTrak estimates that each household receives nearly 50 credit card solicitations in the mail each year," Plunkett said. "Issuers have increased the number of mailed credit card offerings by six-fold since 1990, from just over 1.1 billion to a record 6.06 billion in 2005. The number of solicitations mailed by issuers in 2006 likely exceeded this amount."

Robert Manning, Rochester Institute of Technology Professor and author of Credit Card Nation, pointed to the expansion of lending to lower-income households as one reason why overall credit card profits -- and consumer debt -- is booming.

In Manning's view, the more that lower-income families were ensnared in credit debt, the more their debt could be used to finance larger lending moves for wealthier customers.

"To make the assumption of debt more attractive to these households -- and to entice them into carrying debt for longer periods -- creditors lowered minimum payment balances from around five percent of principal to just over two percent," Manning said.

"More than one-quarter of the lowest income families spent over 40 percent of their income on debt repayment in 2001 ... [the] 'democratization of credit' has had serious negative consequences for many Americans, putting them one unexpected financial emergency away from bankruptcy."

Hope On The Horizon

The hearing put credit card issuers on notice that change may be on the way. Dodd introduced legislation in the previous Congress that would ban certain penalty fees and mandate clearer disclosure of credit card terms and is expected to introduce a tougher version of the bill this year.

Still, Prof. Warren warned that Congress has a limited window of opportunity in which to act.

With the continuing slump of housing sales causing more defaults and foreclosures, and job growth continually shaky, consumers need help from their debt.

"Americans benefit from markets that work," Warren said. "If Congress repairs the busted credit card market, then Americans -- consumers and businesses alike -- will benefit as well."

Congress Targets Credit Card Companies For Reform...

Tested by Fire: American Express Travelers Cheques


They're touted as the world's safest currency. And guaranteed to be replaced "quickly and easily" if they're lost or stolen -- usually within 24 hours.

That's why a rural Kansas man bought thousands of dollars worth of American Express Travelers Cheques last year.

But the company, he says, refused to honor its guarantee. And that broken promise left him -- and his young family -- in dire financial straits after they lost $9,500 in Travelers Cheques during a house fire last June.

"I specifically chose to buy Travelers Cheques because the company guarantees them if they're lost or stolen," says Mark M. of Coffeyville, Kansas. "But now they've denied my claim because they say there's unsubstantiated evidence that there was a loss.

"This has caused great anguish for my family," adds the unemployed electrician who has a wife and 14-month-old twin daughters. "We've really had to struggle financially. I've even had to sell parts off my wife's van to pay for diapers for our twin girls."

Story continues below video

Mark says he's angry and confused with the way American Express handled his claim.

"I called the company about a week after the fire," he says, adding the cheques burned when flames licked under the top of the opened metal box where he stored them.

ConsumerAffairs.com obtained a copy of the Coffeyville Fire Department's report, which ruled the blaze accidental. "We stayed in a motel for three or four days and then I was going back and forth to make the house livable."

No Refund

Mark says he sent American Express all the documents it requested, including proof that he bought the cheques, the serial numbers of the ones that burned, a copy of the fire department's report, and a claim form.

But he didn't receive a refund within 24 hours -- as the company promises.

In fact, he didn't hear from American Express for several weeks.

"About a month went by and I heard nothing from them," Mark says, adding he purchased the cheques in March, 2006, when he closed his bank account. He says he didn't want to carry around that much cash or deposit the funds in another bank.

"Then I finally spoke to a lady who said, 'We're going to talk about refunding $500.'"

Mark says he tried to explain to the American Express representative that he lost $9,500 -- not $500. But his comments, he says, fell on deaf ears.

"I couldn't reason with her. And then by her mannerism she indicated that the company would not approve my claim at all ... that's what I started to fear."

Claim Denied

In September -- three months after the fire -- Mark received a letter from American Express stating the company "extensively reviewed your claim ... and based upon our investigation of the information furnished by you, there is insufficient substantiation that your Cheques were lost/stolen from you. Under these circumstances, we regret that we must deny your claim."

Shocked and upset by the company's response, Mark contacted the Better Business Bureau (BBB) for assistance. "But that didn't do any good."

American Express, he says, just sent him two more letters in response to his BBB complaint.

The final letter arrived in December -- approximately six months after the fire -- and stated: "We show that our Claims Review department sent you a letter on September 28, 2006, regarding your claim ... at this time, we consider this matter closed."

Mark says he's outraged by the company's response -- and failure to honor its guarantee.

"This has been very stressful for me and my family. I've had a heck of a time finding a job. I'm so broke I can't even afford a postage stamp," he said.

In late December, 2006, Mark contacted ConsumerAffairs.com.

"I am in a dire financial situation and I need that money," he told us. We immediately contacted American Express.

Companies Denies the Denial

Rob Sherman, director of Public Affairs and Communications for American Express Travelers Cheques and Prepaid Services, told us he couldn't discuss the specifics of Mark's case.

He did say, however, that American Express had not -- as the earlier letters stated -- denied Mark's claim. He said the company was still investigating.

Within days after our call, American Express agreed to give Mark a $6,950 refund.

Mark says his family couldn't have received better news.

"I'm failing to convey in words my gratitude to you all," he says. "You made the difference. There were times where we didn't have enough money for gas so I could go out and search for work.

"This money is going to allow me and my family to go on about our lives instead of waiting. I'm happy this is all over and I thank you so very much."

Why did American Express change its decision after we contacted the company?

And how did it reach that $6,950 refund amount?

The company's Rob Sherman again told us he couldn't discuss the specifics of Mark's case. But he added: "We continued to look at the circumstances and made this decision on the refund."

Sherman says his company usually issues refunds within 24 hours after the cheques are reported lost or stolen.

A Rare Case?

"But in rare cases, like this one, we have to look more fully at the claim," he says. "Those are regrettable instances, but we have to make sure we're doing everything according to our policy. I regret this was a frustrating situation for this consumer."

When asked what procedures American Express follows when investigating cases of lost or stolen cheques, Sherman told us: "We ask consumers to notify us as soon as possible once their cheques are missing. We gather information from the consumer, including some circumstances about the loss, and in a vast majority of these claims, a refund is issued usually in 24 hours. But again, it all depends on the circumstances."

American Express, he says, has internal procedures that immediately "flag" stolen or lost Travelers Cheques.

"We record the serial numbers of those cheques in our system and then merchants or banks -- points of transactions -- have authorization systems where they can check those numbers," Sherman explains. "And they would be able to identify that these cheques -- with these serial numbers -- are no longer valid and have been reported as lost or stolen."

Sherman says his company tracks the cheques -- by their serial numbers -- to see where they've been used and who passed them. He refused to say if any of the cheques Mark reported as lost were ever used.

Consumers, he says, can avoid delays or problems if their Travelers Cheques are lost or stolen if they:

• Become familiar with the terms and conditions of the cheques' use. That information is available on the company's Web site, www.americanexpress.com;

• Sign the top of the cheques when they purchase them;

• Keep the serial numbers of the cheques in a separate location -- not with the cheques;

• Keep track of how many cheques they've spent and where they've used them;

• Immediately file a report if the cheques are lost or stolen

"It's in everyone's best interest if we can issue a refund in 24 hours," Sherman says, adding Travelers Cheques never expire. "We regret when we can't do that and those cases are rare."

Little Comfort

His words, however, give Mark little comfort. He says he's lost faith in American Express and its promises.

"I bought my Travelers Cheques under the pretense that if they were lost or stolen, I'd get a refund relatively soon," Mark says. "But the service I received from the company was very bad.

"I'll never buy Travelers Cheques again."

They're touted as the world's safest currency. And guaranteed to be replaced "quickly and easily" if they're lost or stolen -- usually within 24 hours....

Michigan Credit Card Mystery Deepens


The story quietly appeared in local Michigan newspapers earlier this month: Wesco, a statewide gas station chain, was urging customers to contact their financial institutions to correct any inaccurate or fraudulent transactions, raising fears of a new wave of credit card fraud.

The Muskegon-based company warned that transactions that took place between July 25th and September 7th of this year might have been affected, and said it was working with local and federal authorities to determine what happened.

Wesco said it was made aware of the fraud not by irate customers, but by the banks themselves. Financial institutions had contacted Wesco to point out irregularities that might indicate fraud.

That would have been the end of it, normally, but numerous banks and credit unions are now canceling and reissuing cards to their customers as a result of fraud -- and those incidents may be linked to the still-unsolved breach at Wesco.

Financial institutions in the Muskegon area, such as the Community Shores Bank and the Family Financial Credit Union, have issued new cards to a combined total of over 1,500 customers after several incidents of card fraud were reported beginning Nov. 9th.

Reports indicated that the fraudulent transactions were carried out with physical cards, rather than online transactions that just process a card number.

Cincinnati-based Fifth Third Bancorp disclosed on Nov. 16th that it, too, was reissuing cards to a number of its customers based on unspecified instances of fraud. The bank received notification from MasterCard of the problem, but the card issuer refused to disclose details of the breach even to the bank itself.

The most MasterCard would do was admit that the breach was centered around an unidentified "Michigan retailer."

Both card issuers and Wesco have remained silent on details of the gas retailer's involvement in the fraud, how many customers might have been affected, and why it took so long for anything to be done about it.

Deja Vu

The Wesco mystery bears a strong resemblance to the security breach that forced Citibank to shut down thousands of its cards and reissue them. The bank claimed the shutdown was a result of a breach in its system.

Further investigation indicated that hackers might have stolen cardholders' PIN data from a third-party payment processor, and used the data to encode "clone" cards with which they could drain their targets' checking accounts at will.

Visa finally admitted that a problem with a contracted processing company contributed to the breach after yet another recall incident, but refused to identify the company or explain why it waited so long to inform the public.

The lack of information surrounding debit and credit card fraud incidents is partially due to the desire to avoid bad publicity. No retailer or payment company wants to be known as the next, and the market power of card issuers such as Visa and MasterCard means they can act with relative impunity when it comes to hiding the truth about security breaches.

Numerous incidents involving breaches of bank security also demonstrate that there are major vulnerabilities at every level of a plastic transaction, from withdrawing money to buying goods online.

Smart fraudsters will often wait weeks or months before utilizing stolen credit card data, usually long after a business ceases to be concerned about an incident.

Many will use the data in ways that can't be easily detected, such as encoding hotel keys with stolen credit card info, and using the "clone cards" for small transactions that wouldn't indicate fraud.

What You Can Do

Use credit cards, not debit cards, for plastic purchases. Federal law limits cardholder liability for fraudulent transactions to $50 for credit cards. Although there are moves being made to extend this protection to debit cards, it's still safer to restrict your debit card usage to taking money out of an ATM.

Use cash for small, everyday transactions. The best way to avoid being dinged by credit card fraud is to keep the plastic in your wallet. Use cash to buy gas or small goods, and reserve the cards for big-ticket items.

Check your statements regularly for fraud or unexplained transactions, and contact your bank immediately if you find any inaccuracies. Most financial institutions will reverse fraudulent charges on a credit card on the spot, and many are now doing so for debit cards as well.

Wesco was urging customers to contact their financial institutions to correct any inaccurate or fraudulent transactions, raising fears of a new wave of cre...

Penalty Fees, Interest Rate Hikes, and Misleading Contracts Await Credit Card Shoppers


With the holiday shopping season upon us, Consumers Union is warning shoppers about the increasing number of credit card traps that can trip up consumers and lead to spiraling debt.

"You can find yourself buried in debt if you aren't careful to avoid the credit card gotchas," said Michelle Jun, Staff Attorney for Consumers Union. "Too many credit cards are designed to get you in debt and keep you there."

Consumers enjoy few protections when it comes to credit cards, according to Consumers Union, and there are an increasing number of ways they can be penalized with fees or get stuck with higher interest rates:

Universal default: Your interest rate can skyrocket if your credit score declines because of your behavior with other creditors even if you always pay your credit card on time and never miss a payment. Some card issuers will raise your rate if you inquire about a car loan or open a new credit card.

Change of terms: Credit card terms keep changing. Read the fine print and chances are you'll find this disclosure: "We reserve the right to change the terms (including the APRs) at any time for any reason." A fixed rate is fixed until the bank gives you at least 15 days notice that it isn't. If you want to keep your account open, you'll pay the higher new rate on your existing balance.

Teaser rates: That low rate you signed up for expires suddenly and you end up paying more. A temptingly low introductory rate can climb to 30 percent or more.

Minimum payment: If you pay the minimum payment every month, you'll end up paying a lot more than what you charged and you could be on the hook for a very long time.

On time payment: Card issuers are systematically mailing statements closer to the due date, giving customers less turnaround time. You can be hit with a late fee even if the payment is mailed on time. The average fee for a late payment has more than doubled in the past decade.

Double cycle billing: Finance charges are usually calculated using the average daily balance. If you alternate between paying off and carrying a balance, you'll end up paying more interest.

Cash advance/convenience checks: The interest rates on these are higher than your credit card.

Penalty interest and fees: Late payments can raise your interest from 7 percent to 27 percent! Rather than rejecting charges that exceed your credit card limit, issuers today often let them go through but then charge a hefty fee

• as high as $39.

Fees, fees, and more fees: As if the penalties weren't enough, you pay more fees for paying by phone or charging abroad. You may have to pay a fee to receive what used to be free year- end summary statements.

Balance transfer switcheroo: Transferring a balance from an account with a high APR to another one with a lower interest rate could come at a high cost. Any payments you make are typically applied first to the lowest rate balance. So while the credit card company uses your payment to quickly pay off that 0 percent transfer balance, you are piling up interest on purchases, at say, 18 percent. Multiple balance transfers will hurt your credit score.

A recent report by the General Accountability Office (GAO) found that there are many types of credit card fees, and that they have risen much faster than inflation. It also finds that current fee disclosures are difficult to understand, bury important information, and often fail to convey to cardholders when late fees would be charged and what actions could result in penalty interest rates.

The report found that 35 percent of active credit cardholders of the six largest issuers were charged at least one penalty fee in 2005, averaging $33.64.

Penalty Fees, Interest Rate Hikes, and Misleading Contracts Await Credit Card Shoppers...

Visa Publishes Interchange Fees For Credit Cards

Visa has taken the unusual step of publishing a list of "interchange fees" it charges merchants to process their credit and debit cards when customers make transactions with plastic.

The fees are often called a "hidden tax on consumers," as they can drive up the price of goods and services without consumers' knowledge.

It's these interchange fees that have led a coalition of merchants and retailers to sue Visa, MasterCard, and their partner banks, over what the merchants call collusive price-fixing.

The interchange fee list, available as a PDF report, is a bewildering array of "performance thresholds" and "reimbursement fees" that seems to require a degree in calculus to understand.

The basic gist is that different cards and different purchases end up costing merchants different fees to process, ranging from 1 to 2 percent of the transaction plus change.

When you factor in the billions of credit and debit transactions that go on in the world daily, 1 percent of a purchase can add up to millions in revenue for banks and card companies. It can also wipe out the retailer's profit from a transaction.

In order to make a profit, merchants will often raise prices on their goods and services, even for those who pay exclusively with cash.

The Merchant Payments Coalition, the group representing retail and restaurant chains, hailed the move but said that it wasn't enough to simply reveal the fees, and that more transparency was needed in the business.

"The report shows a bewildering array of rates for different cards, merchants and types of transactions, which emphasizes the opacity of interchange," said MPC chairman Mallory Duncan.

Duncan also noted the recent Government Accountability Office (GAO) report on the poor disclosure of credit card fees to consumers, saying it was "no surprise" that merchant fees would be similarly hard to understand.

Although Visa had originally claimed it would not publish its interchange fee rates, the world's largest credit card company reversed course after chief rival MasterCard agreed to do so in an attempt to appease the merchants suing the company.

Visa recently announced its own initial public stock offering, after eyeing the success of MasterCard's debut on the market. The MasterCard IPO is chiefly designed to build a "war chest" of funds to pay for litigation and settlements in the merchant lawsuits, thereby shifting the risk to investors rather than the member banks that formerly owned MasterCard.

Mitch Goldstone, one of the lead plaintiffs in the class-action merchant lawsuits, said on his blog that Visa and MasterCard should post the exact interchange fee of each transaction on the customer's receipt.

"Without this honest and straightforward posting, this hidden tax will continue to feed Visa and MasterCards' member banks with thirty billion dollars each year," Goldstone said.

Visa Publishes Interchange Fees For Credit Cards...

Credit Card Fees Rise, Disclosure Statements Inadequate


If you're overwhelmed by the numerous and mysterious fees that appear on your credit card statement, and the statement is so incomprehensible that it might as well be written in hieroglyphics, you're not alone.

"Unfair or confusing credit card practices take advantage of working families," said Sen. Carl Levin (D-Mich.), who commissioned a report by the Government Accountability Office (GAO) that found credit card fees and interest rates are rising while disclosure statements remain largely inpenetrable.

"This report shines a needed spotlight on excessive credit card fees, unfair interest rates, and inadequate disclosure practices that ought to be stopped," Levin said.

The published the report after surveying six of the major banks in the United States, which account for 80 percent of the nation's total credit card debt. The banks included J.P. Morgan Chase, Bank of America, and Capital One.

"Although credit card issuers are required to provide cardholders with information aimed at facilitating informed use of credit and enhancing consumers' ability to compare the costs and terms of credit, we found that these disclosures have serious weaknesses that likely reduced consumers' ability to understand the costs of using credit cards," the GAO reported.

Among the report's findings:

• Credit card charges in the United States exceed $1 trillion dollars as of 2005, with an estimated 691 million cards issued to American citizens. Total American household debt, including credit card debt, came to $830 billion by the end of 2005.

• Penalty fees for actions such as late payments have more than doubled in the last ten years, from $13 in 1995 to as much as $34 in 2005.

• Card issuers now charge a variety of "hidden" or additional fees, such as charging for payments made over the phone, cash advances, and balance transfers. These fees can range from $10 to $31, depending on the transaction.

• Exceedingly high interest rates -- often as much as 30 percent -- are charged when customers miss a payment.

• Although half of Americans can only read at an eighth-grade level or below, the average credit card statement and disclosure information is written at a high-school level. Important information such as late fees or actions that could change their interest rate was often hard to locate and printed in small type, or scattered throughout the form.

In addition, the report found that many lenders will charge borrowers interest on balances already paid, by calculating the interest against the total debt on their card in the monthly billing cycle. This tactic, called "trailing interest," is often compounded by banks charging late fees on the unpaid interest.

Cardholders who take advantage of "convenience checks," checks written against the card's account balance, often find themselves paying additional interest charges and overlimit charges if they already have a balance on the card.

Convenience checks' terms are often not disclosed in the solicitation, and check holders have to call the bank to find out what the conditions really are.

The banks surveyed in the report claimed that the penalties and fees came as a result of issuing cards to "riskier" customers.

By pricing interest rates according to the borrower's "credit quality," the banks could offer cards to those who would otherwise have no access to credit, while retaining the lowest interest rates and most favorable terms for their "best" customers.

The banks also claimed that 80 percent of their cardholders had interest rates of 20 percent or less on their cards, with half of the active account holders paying their balances in full.

The data provided to the GAO by the banks indicated that a "small minority" of cardholders -- 35 percent -- were affected by late fees and interest hikes, but comprehensive data on the percentage of Americans paying penalty fees was unavailable.

The GAO concluded that there still was not enough comprehensive data to effectively link high interest rates and late fees to consumer debt, including filing for bankruptcy. While banks were seeing lower revenues from higher cardholder payoffs, this may be offset by increased gains from late fees and penalties.

The GAO recommended that all credit card disclosures be written in easily understood English, with clear emphasis on all actions that could lead to increases in interest rates and fees, as well as the fees themselves.

Credit Card Fees Rise, Disclosure Statements Inadequate...

"Convenience Checks" Carry a Heavy Price Tag


"Convenience checks" -- those allegedly free checks that enable you to spend money that's borrowed from your line of credit -- are anything but.

Even the most tempting offer is laden with hidden fees and traps that make the risk far greater than the reward.

Most alarming, convenience checks start accruing interest on the balance immediately from the time it's drawn -- unlike credit card charges, which are interest-free if you pay them off before the due date.

Some card issuers may charge hefty fees just to issue the check -- often as much as 2 to 5 percent of the check amount. As the interest rate information is often not listed on the check itself, cardholders will have to talk to their bank to get the fine print.

Worse yet, if your card has an existing balance, any payments you make will be applied to the lower balance first, at your current interest rate, before they are applied to the convenience check balance.

That means the balance will continue to accrue unpaid interest as long as you use the card to make purchases.

Scott T., of Los Angeles, wrote ConsumerAffairs.com asking if his drawing an advance check from his card meant he'd just been scammed.

"I thought that I had no other charges on the card that month, but I was wrong," he said. "I had about $200 in other charges."

"So, when the statement came in I sent the credit card company two checks, with instructions to apply one to the $200 in charges that month and the other ($1000) to the cash advance," Scott said.

"The paperwork that came with the interest free check said that the card issuer generally applies the money received to the lowest interest-generating balance first, but 'generally' is not the same word as 'always.'"

Emily Davidson, who writes for the Creditbloggers.com money and finance blog, looked into Scott's predicament.

"The [bank] representative told me that it is their policy to apply all payments to the balance with the lower APR before the paying off any balance with a higher APR," she told ConsumerAffairs.com. "I believe that most issuers have the same policy. It sounds like your reader is going to have to pay back all $10,000 before he can pay off the $200."

"This case really demonstrates what a terrible trap those paper 'checks' can be," Davidson said. "Any sort of late payment or default will usually cancel the 0% promotional rate and will often cause you be to charged back-dated interest."

The Motley Fool's Marko Djuranovic crunched the numbers on what a $10,000 convenience check from his credit line might cost him in an article last year.

According to Djuranovic's calculations, after all the hidden fees, accumulated interest, and minimum payments due, he'd have to pay at least 38 percent of the total borrowed amount back within two years, or risk accumulating charges pushing his balance to $12,000 or higher.

Djuranovic had been thinking of using the convenience check to make a short-term investment, hoping for a quick profit but his calculations scotched that idea.

"This negates the point of my original idea as there is no remotely reasonable rate of return that can fulfill that promise," he said. "I don't mind a little risk, but I'm not crazy!"

More Hidden Danger

But excessive fees and high interest rates aren't the only peril that comes with convenience checks. Because it's a blank check written to you from your bank, if it falls out of your hands, identity thieves can use the check to treat themselves to anything they want -- with your money.

Although some lenders such as American Express require a check holder to call in to activate the check, many others do not. And the federal laws that protect credit card users from fraud don't always extend to convenience checks.

Credit analysts recommend shredding and destroying any convenience checks you receive in the mail, to avoid "dumpster divers" piecing together your identity and using your credit line to go on a shopping spree.

Given the expenses, the hidden traps, and the dangers that can come with "convenience checks," it seems safer to call them "inconvenience checks."

If you need cash, find it somewhere else. Otherwise, you'll be paying a very high price for a the supposed convenience.

"Convenience checks" -- those allegedly free checks that enable you to spend money that's borrowed from your line of credit -- are anything but....

"Trailing Interest" Snags Bank Of America Customers

The world's No. 2 bank is at it again, this time by embracing an innovative form of late charges on credit card balances that can leave customers in debt even if they've paid their balance in full.

Joe of Clarks Summit, Penn., wrote in to tell us about what happened when he paid off a balance on his credit card in full.

"Even if you pay your BoA card in full, you next statement will contain an interest charge - even if you made no further purchases," he said.

"They call it trailing interest. Their explanation: they now charge interest for each day after your accounting period ended and until your payment is received. So if you wait till near the due date to pay your BoA credit car bill you get whacked harder."

In other words, even if you pay off your complete balance in full, if you don't pay it off by a specific date, you accrue interest on that old balance. So you can pay off a bill, think it's done, then find out you still have interest from a balance two months old.

Writer and businessman Michael Phillips, who once compiled a history of MasterCard, had a similar experience when he received his bill for his Visa card in September 2005. The statement was for $1,241.93.

"I am a terrible customer, I have always paid my bills in full and on time," he said. "This time I decided to see what happened if I only paid $1000. What would the interest charges on $241.93 be?"

Philips was socked with a bill for $970.68, including a $16.44 finance charge. He calculated that he was being charged interest on the average balance of his prior balance, which was $1,241.93.

"That means two things," he wrote. "First, I am being charged interest on a month for which there is no prior outstanding loan balance. I paid it off on time with interest. Now I am being charged interest on a period for which there was no borrowing.

"Second, adding the new $7.31 interest charge to the prior interest charge of $16.44 we get a total interest I am being charged of $23.75. No other fees are involved but finance charges -- interest," he wrote.

A commenter claiming to be a Bank of America employee wrote in some time later to say that his bank's policy was to charge interest for two months running on accounts that had unpaid balances, even if the balance was fully paid in the first month.

"If you pay in full, the only profit the company makes off you is interchange fees, which doesn't make you a very profitable customer," he said.

Since acquiring Wilmington, DE-based MBNA, the megabank has adopted much of its conquest's worst habits, from charging excessive interest rates over "universal default" to charging late fees at the first opportunity.

Bank of America recently announced it was renewing its partnership with Visa, the world's largest credit card issuer, through 2011.

Bank of America had floated trial balloons that it might dump the Visa brand and use its acquisition of MBNA to build its own credit card network, but in the end chose to stick with a proven way to extract money from consumers.

Although Bank of America customers have little reason to celebrate being squeezed so hard, shareholders are pleased. Today the financial giant reached an all-time high stock price of $54.33 a share.

Bank of America execs are also breathing a sigh of relief after settling a multiyear investigation into charges that the bank was laundering money for shady businesses in Brazil. The bank paid $7.5 million to the state of New York and stated that it had never knowingly enabled criminal activity to take place in its business.

"Even if you pay your BoA card in full, you next statement will contain an interest charge - even if you made no further purchases," said Joe of Clarks Sum...

Experian Launches New Credit Score


The Experian credit agency became the first to start selling its new "VantageScore" credit scoring system this week. Critics aren't impressed.

John Ulzheimer of the credit information Web site CreditBloggers said that the hype over the VantageScore was "nothing more than an effort to confuse consumers and unsophisticated lenders."

"I'm not angry at the bureaus for trying to muscle out FICO," Ulzheimer said. "[M]y question is could they have spent their collaborative time together more constructively for consumers?"

The three credit bureaus jointly developed VantageScore as an alternative to the lending score created by the Fair Isaac Company (FICO), which is the standard score used by lenders to judge a borrower's creditworthiness.

For $5.95 a pop, users can buy the Experian VantageScore and see where the new credit system ranks them in terms of attractiveness to lenders. The new VantageScore system grades consumers on a number scale from 501 to 990, with a corresponding letter grade of "F" to "A."

Experian information solutions group president Kerry Williams says the new score "responded to the clear need for an objective scoring model that works across all three reporting companies' data."

Currently, Experian and fellow credit bureau TransUnion offer their own "proprietary" credit scores with the reports borrowers can purchase, but these scores are often wildly divergent from a consumer's real FICO score.

Although the bureaus claim these scores are "educational," they're heavily advertised as being legitimate credit scores that borrowers can use to judge their credit stability. Lenders, however, largely prefer the traditional FICO score, due to its longevity and prominence in the industry.

Equifax, the third of the "Big Three" credit bureaus, has been offering its true FICO scores with its reports. The scoring formula FICO uses has been closely guarded by the company as a trade secret, and the major credit bureaus have to pay Fair Isaac a licensing fee to use it in their credit scoring and reports.

CreditBloggers founder Emily Davidson purchased her VantageScore on June 20th and compared it to her Experian FICO score. According to Davidson, the ordering process was clumsy and counterintuitive, and the score ranking did not include information from her Experian credit report.

"Experian's VantageScore was difficult to interpret and their ordering system was poorly designed," she said. "If the bureaus are serious about competing with FICO, they need to work on making this score the best in the industry for both consumers and businesses."

The new credit score system has been criticized for making the same mistake as the current credit scoring system -- relying on inadequate or inaccurate data reported to the bureaus.

Sloppy record-keeping, mixing of different consumer records, and complex dispute resolution processes mean that even if the three bureaus are sharing the same score, they're still relying on bad data to make their scoring decisions.

Experian Launches New Credit Score...

Study Disputes Lenders' Excuses for Charging Blacks and Latinos Higher Rates


African-Americans and Latinos, government figures show, get high-interest sub-prime mortgages far more often than whites. Now researchers at the Center for Responsible Lending find those disparities persist even when the borrowers have the same qualifications as whites.

Lenders say they charge more because African-Americans and Latinos tend to have shakier credit histories, which makes lending to them riskier.

But that explanation is simply wrong, the Center found in its new research.

The most extensive study of its kind shows that even after controlling for differences such as credit scores and the amount of the down payment, African-Americans and Latinos still wind up with a disproportionate share of expensive loans.

Examining 50,000 subprime loans, the Center's researchers found these groups were almost a third more likely to get a high-priced loan than white borrowers with the same credit profile.

The findings show that decades of work by the civil rights movement to bring fairness and opportunity to all homebuyers is still unfinished.

"This report sheds new light on the challenges Latinos face when attempting to buy a home," said Janis Bowdler, housing policy analyst at the National Council of La Raza, the Latino civil rights group. "It is critical to the well-being of the homeownership market that all families have fair and equal access to credit."

The disparities are not only unfair, they have serious economic repercussions: Higher loan costs discourage minority families from buying a home; and higher costs increase the risk of foreclosure for those who do buy homes, threatening working-class neighborhoods and the U.S. economy as a whole.

"When African-American and Latino families are steered into higher-cost loans, this path to security is made steeper," said Hilary Shelton, director of the Washington bureau of the NAACP, the lobbying and public policy branch of the civil rights group. "That means that it's even harder for families of color to build equity for their future; it's even harder to send their children to college; and it's even harder to build wealth for the next generation."

And while the study's results are disturbing for African-Americans and Latinos, all borrowers may be at risk from some of the sub-prime market's common practices.

New York Attorney General Eliot Spitzer is trying to get banks in his state to disclose more about their lending practices, but the banks and even federal regulators are fighting him in court.

"We sincerely hope that the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency investigates loan pricing disparities at the banks it regulates with the same vigor with which it sought to stop our inquiries," said Natalie Williams, chief of the attorney general's civil rights bureau. "The center's report, and the troubling racial disparities it reveals, deserve nothing less."

And on Capitol Hill a House subcommittee is debating whether a bill should include weak provisions favored by industry or stronger protections for borrowers in the vast sub-prime mortgage market, where people with blemished credit borrow and most mortgage abuses occur. The lending industry is lobbying subcommittee members heavily.

In light of our findings, the Center urges the subcommittee to:

• Put controls on the pervasive practice of yield spread premiums, the fees lenders pay to brokers and that rise with the interest rate of the mortgage. Often these fees are nothing more than a polite name for a kickback from a lender to a mortgage broker for steering unsophisticated borrowers into higher-interest-rate loans. These kickbacks, many experts say, are a big reason why the statistics the federal government gathers each year under the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act, or HMDA, show that African-Americans and Latinos wind up in higher-interest-rate loans far out of proportion to their share of the population.

• The federal government should require mortgage brokers to act in the best interests of their customers, which the government does not now do.

• Make brokers and lenders disclose clearly that borrowers are being charged a higher interest rate than they qualify for - and how much the broker is being paid for this.

• Give the government the laws and the money to enforce these rules effectively.

"With release of our research today, we've advanced the debate over racial disparities by showing that the industry's usual explanation is wrong," said Debbie Gruenstein Bocian, the study's author. "The debate now needs to move on to what Congress and the states must do to prevent these disparities."

A copy of the report is available at www.responsiblelending.org.


Blacks and Latinos, government figures show, get high-interest sub-prime mortgages far more often than whites. Now researchers at the Center for Responsible Lending find those disparities persist even when the borrowers have the same qualifications as whites.

Lenders say they charge more because black Americans and Latinos tend to have shakier credit histories, which makes lending to them riskier. But, according to the Center, that explanation is simply wrong.

The study shows that even after controlling for differences such as credit scores and the amount of the down payment, blacks and Latinos still wind up with a disproportionate share of expensive loans.

In its examination of 50,000 subprime loans, the Center's researchers found these groups were almost a third more likely to get a high-priced loan than white borrowers with the same credit profile.

"This report sheds new light on the challenges Latinos face when attempting to buy a home," said Janis Bowdler, housing policy analyst at the National Council of La Raza, the Latino civil rights group. "It is critical to the well-being of the homeownership market that all families have fair and equal access to credit."

The Center says that the disparities are not only unfair, they have serious economic repercussions: Higher loan costs discourage minority families from buying a home; and higher costs increase the risk of foreclosure for those who do buy homes, threatening working-class neighborhoods and the U.S. economy as a whole.

"When African-American and Latino families are steered into higher-cost loans, this path to security is made steeper," said Hilary Shelton, director of the Washington bureau of the NAACP, the lobbying and public policy branch of the civil rights group.

"That means that it's even harder for families of color to build equity for their future; it's even harder to send their children to college; and it's even harder to build wealth for the next generation."

Study Disputes Lenders' Excuses for Charging Blacks and Latinos Higher Rates...

Zero To 30 Percent In Just One Month

Finding a credit card that delivers on promises of a low interest rate can be next to impossible. Even when consumers read all the fine print, they find the terms are subject to change, seemingly at the whim of the credit card company.

For example, John, of New Falmouth, Massachusetts, said he answered an ad for Household Bank's Platinum Mastercard, which offered a 0 percent introductory fixed rate for the first 12 months for purchases and balance transfers.

John's existing credit card charged just over 9 percent, not a bad rate these days. But being a thrifty consumer, John said he wanted to take advantage of the offer of 12 months without interest. So he applied for a card.

"The introductory letter stated that, upon approval, they would send balance transfer checks in my Welcome Kit, to make it easy to transfer balances," John told ConsumerAffairs.com. "I was told that when you use these checks, there is no transaction fee."

Within a week, John said he received a package of material from Household Bank, thanking him for his business. The package contained several checks.

Since it was the only communication he received from Household Bank, John assumed the checks were the balance transfer checks he had requested.

"I then proceeded to make out two balance transfers and sent them off. The next correspondence I received from the bank was a bill showing the transfers ... not at 0%, but at 29.51%! I immediately called customer service."

John said he was told that he most likely had used the wrong checks to transfer his other credit card balances.

It seems that Household Bank has "balance transfer checks" and "credit card checks." The difference?

One supposedly has no transaction fee and allows you to move a high interest balance to the new account at 0 percent interest. Using the other is the same as taking a cash advance on your credit card, the most expensive credit card purchase there is.

John said he was told he had used the wrong check, even though he insists it was the only type of check contained in the bank's "welcome kit."

So now John's previous credit card balances, which were at 9.9 percent with his previous credit card company, have suddenly jumped to nearly 30 percent with Household Bank. And it gets worse.

"Because of the high interest rate, combined with the second balance transfer check I sent, my request was not honored by Household Bank because it would have put me over my credit limit," John said.

That check, John says, ended up bouncing, causing late fees and raising the interest rate on his lower-rate credit card. Sometimes, even reading the fine print doesn't seem to help.

Zero To 30 Percent In Just One Month...

Credit Bureaus Introduce New Scoring System


Just when it seemed consumers were getting a handle on how credit scores -- those three-digit numbers that can determine your lending rate for cars, credit cards, and mortgages -- were generated, the three major credit bureaus have introduced a new scoring system that shares data from all three agencies.

The new system, "VantageScore," is designed to provide better reports and more accurate data, and covers a more extensive consumer base, including the elusive "thin credit file" for consumers who have little to no credit history.

It's also a direct challenge to the Fair Isaac Corporation's FICO score, which provides the most commonly used credit scoring for mortgage lenders and other agencies.

The FICO score has, until now, been the model for the three bureaus -- Equifax, Experian, and Trans Union -- to directly gauge customer credit worthiness, or to develop their own scores.

With the arrival of the Vantage Score, the major players in the credit industry are claiming that they "will provide consumers and businesses with a highly predictive, consistent score that is easy to understand and apply."

But some observers say that the new scoring model won't change the biggest problem consumers face when it comes to credit scoring -- inaccurate or incomplete data in their individual reports.

Remaking the Grade

The VantageScore system utilizes data culled from a sampling of millions of credit files reviewed by the three agencies, creating a single consistent score, utilizing "cutting-edge, patent-pending analytic techniques."

According to company press, the new score would provide far less variation than the proprietary scores used by some of the major bureaus.

The FICO score model grades consumers' credit ratings based on factors such as debt-to-income ratio, credit usage and history, bad credit items, and so on.

Whereas the FICO score ranges from 300 to 850, with most Americans scoring between 670 and 700, the new VantageScore goes from 501 to 990, with each score range being grouped by letter. Consumers with scores in the 900 and higher range would be grouped in the "A" range, while those in the 600 and below range would receive a grade of "F."

Borrowers are often frustrated in their attempts to gain new credit, as each bureau utilizes its own proprietary credit score, often wildly differing from one another. Equifax switched to using the FICO score in 2005, but Trans Union and Experian utilize their own scores.

Fair Isaac has been criticized for not disclosing the inner workings of its credit scoring algorithm, citing it as a proprietary business secret.

Although each involved agency would utilize the VantageScore in offering information to lenders, there would still be variances in data from each bureau, owing to the differences in data they collect on consumers.

Michael Nathans, president of "alternative" credit bureau Payment Reporting Builds Credit (PRBC), said that as long as some bureaus report payments from consumers and others don't, there will always be inaccuracies in a consumer's credit report that they will have to correct.

"There is a great deal of information from people who are paying their bills on time, and the credit bureaus don't care enough to track it," he said.

Vantage Point

PRBC and other agencies like it have been challenging traditional credit models by using systems based on utility payments, rental payments, and so on.

The "thin credit file" market can gain access to better rates by using these systems, and they represent a coveted new area of expansion for all the major players in the credit industry.

The major credit bureaus claim that VantageScore will offer "more predictive scoring" on thin-file consumers, but details were scant as to how the new score would elicit more accurate information.

Representatives at Fair Isaac were skeptical that the new score would be immediately adopted for use by lenders and businesses. Fair Isaac vice-president Ron Totaro told USA Today that the new numbering system would cause confusion for people.

A borrower with a FICO credit score of 800 had "excellent credit," he said, but under the new VantageScore system, that would only grant them a letter grade of "C."

PRBC's Nathans joked that the day of the VantageScore announcement, he received many e-mails claiming "the big 3 bureaus were out to kill FICO." Nathans thought Fair Isaac was "prepared" for the competition from VantageScore, and will continue to look for ways to get new data for their own lending scores.

According to the press statement, the VantageScore system was developed by VantageScore Solutions, LLC, an "independent" company created and owned by the three major bureaus. Federal law prohibits the three bureaus from directly sharing data on consumer records.

The 3 major credit agencies had previously agreed to create a "data protection standard" to make sure information transmitted from lenders and other businesses to the bureaus was not tampered with. Critics noted that this move also did not address the question of inaccurate data in the credit reports themselves.

Credit Bureaus Introduce New Scoring System...

Discover Debit Card Challenges Visa and MasterCard

Two recent actions involving the Discover Financial Services company have positioned it to challenge Visa and MasterCard for dominance in the multibillion-dollar credit and debit card market, and have raised the stakes in the battle between banks, merchants, and consumers over the hidden fees involved in using plastic for purchases.

Discover announced that it was introducing Discover Debit, its own debit card brand, to compete with Visa and MasterCard's debit offerings and increase its profile as a full-service payment company.

In a statement announcing the venture on Feb. 13th, Discover CEO David W. Nelms touted the move as "a highly appealing alternative for financial institutions, merchants and consumers."

"The launch of Discover Debit builds on this with a new, uncomplicated approach to signature debit that provides convenience and broad acceptance to cardholders," said Nelms, "as well as security and competitive program features to financial institutions."

Discover touted its new card as offering more attractive features than the competition, including zero liability in case of fraud, clear pricing and billing rules, and better security.

Most attractive to merchants, however, was Discover's announcement that it would be dropping its "No Surcharge" rule when processing merchant transactions.

The "No Surcharge" rule prevented merchants from passing the costs of card transactions on to consumers via tacking on extra fees.

Merchants, in turn, have to pay higher "interchange" fees when processing card transactions, and end up making less money than when customers pay cash.

Discover Financial agreed to drop its "No Surcharge" rule in negotiations over a merchant-backed class action suit against the rule, and was dropped from the suit.

Leveling the Playing Field

Discover's actions are a direct challenge to Visa and MasterCard's dominance in the credit and debit market, coming at a time of increasing consumer awareness of the "hidden fees" they pay to use credit and debit cards.

The "No Surcharge" class action suit is being combined with a separate class action suit challenging Visa and MasterCard's control of interchange fees for merchants.

Photo shop owner Mitch Goldstone is one of the principal litigants in the interchange fee lawsuit. He hailed Discover's dropping of the "No Surcharge" rule as a smart move, and predicted that "Discover Financial is poised to garner substantial support from merchants and consumers."

Goldstone has repeatedly targeted Visa and MasterCard for what he has called "illegal price fixing," through setting excessive processing fees that merchants have to pay when customers use plastic instead of cash.

"While Visa and MasterCard have their heads in the sand, Discover made a brilliant marketing coup which is getting noticed by retailers and cardholders, " Goldstone said.

Discover Financial is owned by New York-based securities and investment firm Morgan Stanley. The firm recently agreed to pay $15 million as part of a settlement with the Securities & Exchange Commission (SEC) for failing to retain e-mail records of its activities.

Discover Debit Card Challenges Visa and MasterCard...

Minimum Credit Card Payments Going Up

A change in banking regulations will mean higher minimum credit card payments for millions of consumers beginning in January. At the urging of federal banking regulators, credit card companies are boosting the minimum payment on balances from two percent to four percent.

The idea is to help consumers. By increasing the minimum payment, the feds reason, consumers will pay down their balances faster, with a greater percentage of their payment going to principal instead of interest. But many cash-strapped consumers may find themselves overwhelmed.

"I have certain funds allocated for certain expenses and if that nearly doubled I would definitely have to realign my budget," Chicago consumer Cetrina Williams told WBBM-TV.

But Justin McHenry, Research Director for IndexCreditCards.com, says the new rules will probably be less burdensome to consumers than they fear. Hes seen the media reports of "double credit card payments" and thinks its overblown.

"While the government is requiring credit card companies to increase monthly minimum payments, the goal is to help credit card customers pay off balances without undue hardship," McHenry said.

Specifically, where most credit card issuers previously required customers to pay off 2% of their outstanding balances each month, most will now require customers to pay all monthly interest and fees, plus 1% of the outstanding balance.

What does that mean for monthly payments? McHenry said significant monthly increases will occur in only the most extreme cases, those in which very large credit card debt is combined with very high interest rates. Even then, he says the result is not as scary as you may think.

For example, he says, imagine a person with a $10,000 credit card debt and a 19 percent annual interest rate, both higher than the average consumer is carrying.

Using the two percent minimum balance calculation, this person would have a required monthly payment of approximately $203.16. Under new requirements, the monthly payment would be $258.33 ($158.33 in interest, plus $100 of the outstanding balance). This is a difference of roughly $55 on a balance and interest rate that exceeds what the average consumer is carrying. Most credit card customers will have much smaller minimum payment increases, if any, he said.

"Unless a credit card company has specifically announced raising their minimum payment from two to four percent, its almost impossible to think of a realistic scenario in which payments will double," says McHenry.

The upcoming change in minimum payments is a result of guidance from the governments Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, which told banks they must require minimum payments that allow customers to pay off their debts in a reasonable amount of time.

Under the current industry-standard two percent minimum payment, customers with high balances can conceivably "meet the minimum" without even paying off a full months interest, much less taking a chunk out of the principal balance.

"While 'this is for your own good' generally should be met with skepticism," says McHenry, "in this case it's true."

Minimum Credit Card Payments Going Up...

Credit Cards Ensnare, Victimize Working Families, Report Finds

A new survey finds that low- and middle-income families are acquiring credit card debt to pay for essentials at the same time that business practices in the credit card industry are making this debt more costly and harder to manage.

This survey from Demos and the Center for Responsible Lending comes just five days before the new bankruptcy bill becomes effective and undermines consumers' ability to recover from heavy debt. Research shows that credit card debt in America has almost tripled since 1989 and now stands at $800 billion.

In addition, owing largely to job instability and medical costs, bankruptcies rose from 616,000 in 1989 to over 1.8 million in 2004.

"American families are facing financial hardship not experienced for generations, and we commissioned this survey to tell us precisely why they are turning to credit cards so often" says Tamara Draut, Director of the Economic Opportunity Program at Demos and co-author of the report.

"The results are clear: wages have stagnated while medical and housing costs have skyrocketed, and if confronted with a layoff or health emergency there are few, if any, personal or public safety nets adequate enough to help in a crisis. Households are turning to high-cost credit cards to keep afloat."

The bankruptcy bill was passed, in part, based on a stereotype that credit card debt results from extravagant and irresponsible use. The Demos/CRL survey contradicts that widespread belief, showing that lower-income families, by and large, are using credit cards judiciously and trying to pay them down responsibly. Among the findings in the survey:

• Seven out of 10 low- and middle-income households reported using their credit cards as a safety net relying on credit to pay for car repairs, basic living expenses, medical expenses or house repairs.

• Households that reported a recent job loss or unemployment, and those without health insurance, were almost twice as likely to use credit cards for basic living expenses.

• Households that used home equity to pay off credit card debt did not gain net benefits. Respondents who reported paying off some credit card debt by refinancing their mortgages reduced their home equity, on average, by $12,000 while retaining average credit card debt of $14,000 18% more debt than homeowners in the survey who had refinanced without paying down credit card debt.

• $8,650 is the average credit card debt of a low- and middle-income indebted household in America.

The study also reports that, as Americans are increasingly relying on credit cards to pay for essentials that wages no longer cover, reliance on credit cards is having a multiplying effect that is creating millions of "debt-stressed" families:

• 47 percent of households had been called by a bill collector.

• Almost half missed or were late with a payment in the last year, with nearly a quarter of households reporting paying a late fee at least one or two times in the past year.

• In addition to charging late fees ranging from $30 and $39, most issuers also penalize cardholders for late payments by increasing the interest rate on the account two- or three-fold, often after only one late payment. A household with the average amount of credit card debt in our survey ($8,650) would pay an additional $1,100 in costs each year if their cards interest rate was increased from the typical 12 percent to the average 25 percent default rate for one late payment.

"Americans families are losing the fight against an economy and lending practices that are working against them," said Mark Pearce, President of the Center for Responsible Lending. "Its time for Washington to address this crisis head-on and create policy that protects, and promotes economic vitality for, all American households."

The report, titled "The Plastic Safety Net: The Reality of Household Debt in America," details current business practices in the credit card industry that make it difficult for lower-income families to manage their finances and stay out of debt, including issuers' ability to change the interest rate and other terms of credit any time and for any reason, and based on transactions unrelated to the account.

The report includes recommendations for reforms that would promote economic security for families and establish fair business practices that would result in more equitable and less capricious credit terms.

Recommendations

Among the reports key policy recommendations:

• Promote increased savings, not increased debt, to help families meet unexpected financial emergencies.

• Improve wages for working families.

• Improve access to affordable health insurance for all Americans.

• Strengthen unemployment insurance coverage and benefit levels.

• Reform "penalty pricing" that saddles financially-vulnerable consumers with thousands of dollars in extra fees and interest costs.

• Require changes in credit card rates and fees to be related to the original contract and limited to future activity on the consumers account.

• Clearly disclose to consumers the long-term costs of making only minimum payments.

• Ban binding mandatory arbitration clauses that prevent consumers from pursuing complaints in a court of law.

• Require meaningful underwriting standards to ensure credit limits do not exceed a consumers ability to repay their credit card debt.

The full report is availabler at www.demos.org and www.responsiblelending.org.

Credit Cards Ensnare, Victimize Working Families, Report Finds...

Credit Cards "Treacherous" For Consumers

More Americans are carrying increasingly large credit card balances, and a leading consumer journal says it's become much harder to get out of the jaws of credit card debt.

An investigation by Consumer Reports, appearing in the November 2005 issue of the magazine, says "cozy relationships" among lawmakers, federal regulators, and credit card issuers have made credit cards "more treacherous" for consumers.

The investigation reveals that credit card issuers have imposed interest rates in excess of 30 percent on consumers whose only offense might be a late payment to another creditor. The report also exposes other practices by issuers of credit cards that pose hazards for consumers, including:

• Battered card holders with fees and penalties that now often hit $39.
• Reduced grace periods when new purchases are free of interest.
• Lobbied successfully to weaken protections for cardholders.
• Increased fees for tardiness and for going over the credit limit.
• Reduced minimum payments, thereby increasing the debt.

Unfortunately for consumers, there have been no limits on interest rates for years, so a temptingly low 1.9 percent APR can morph into double-digit territory at the whim of the credit card company. Or worse, it can climb beyond 30 percent when a consumer does nothing more than sign up for a new credit card, inquire about a car loan, or make a single late payment to any creditor.

"Consumers are sometimes offered a 0 percent introductory rate, but they may not realize that it only applies to transferred balances," says Marlys Harris, finance editor at Consumer Reports. "Then they pile up purchases which accrue interest at, say, 18 percent a year."

Even consumers among the 45 percent of cardholders who pay balances in full each month are not off the hook either. As interest rates rise, issuers of credit cards are seeking ways to eke out income from them by charging additional fees for services or penalties for dormancy -- in other words, a few for not using the card.

Unfortunately, there is little help for consumers. About 45 percent of credit card issuers force customers to submit disputes to arbitration. Regulators aren't likely to be of much help either. The majority of credit card issuers are overseen by a government agency funded by the industry.

What to Do

For now, the report says, the greatest power that consumers have is their own hands. In addition to supporting consumer-friendly issuers, Consumer Reports suggests the following:

• Choose carefully. Start by reading the table of the 10 most consumer-friendly credit cards in the November 2005 issue of Consumer Reports.
• Examine the offers. Scan the Schumer box, named for Sen. Charles Schumer, D-NY, who sponsored a law mandating disclosure of all rates in a type size that consumers can read.
• Negotiate better terms. If the credit card imposes a late fee or a rate hike, ask for a waiver.
• Pay on time. Mail payments as soon as the bill arrives.
• Complain. Register a complaint with your state attorney general.

Credit Cards Treacherous For Consumers...

Credit Card Companies Rocked By New Merchant Lawsuits


Visa and MasterCard, along with major banks such as Capital One and Bank of America, face an accelerating legal challenge by merchants ranging from chain stores to photo shops to grocers.

The lawsuits allege that major banks and the Visa and MasterCard associations charge excessive "interchange fees" to retailers when customers pay for goods using a Visa or MasterCard.

Retailers have to pay the interchange fees in order to receive payments from transactions made using those cards, and the plaintiffs claim the fees are disproportionately high compared to the money they receive from the transaction.

The costs of the interchange fees are passed on to consumers, who have to pay more for goods without realizing it. Mitch Goldstone, CEO of Irvine, CA-based 30 Minute Photos, one of the original lawsuit plaintiffs, has called it a "hidden tax" on consumers.

Goldstone filed the first major lawsuit in June of 2005. Major grocery chains such as Kroger's and Safeway filed their own litigation in July 2005. Retail store associations, including the National Association of Chain Stores (NACS) and the National Association of Chain Drug Stores (NACDS), then filed a class-action antitrust suit this month.

The various lawsuits now go to a Multi-District Litigation (MDL) hearing on Sept. 29th in Asheville, North Carolina. The MDL hearing will determine what form the lawsuits will take and how they will proceed.

Goldstone told ConsumerAffairs.com the lawsuits are "the biggest litigation since AT&T; in the late '80's."

His crusade started when he received a notice from MasterCard that his interchange fee for frequent-flyer card usage was going up. "I sent letters, cards, and e-mails asking for them to rescind this fee. No responseI didn't anticipate being the lead plaintiff in a case this big."

Goldstone views the lawsuit as standing up for retailers and consumers who are forced to shore up banks' profits.

"Retailers are beholden to credit card companies. We've moved so far to an e-commerce model that if I don't accept credit cards, I'm out of business."

Visa and MasterCard, he said, enjoy the benefits of a "noncompetitive" situation, where "a mother going out for a gallon of milk is subsidizing a wealthy customer's free flight," because they're paying the same rates for goods, even if the mother pays cash or writes a check.

Jeff Lenard, spokesperson for NACS, concurred.

"This is an imbalance between fees and economics," he stated. "If you look at other countries' [interchange fee] rates, they're far lower than ours. Why are they so much higher in the United States?"

The, in both Lenard's and Goldstone's views, is to move to a "cost-based interchange" system with "no other component or profit" attached. "Ultimately," Lenard stated, "this hits our bottom line."

Credit card companies and banks are already reaping tremendous windfalls from the interchange fees levied when drivers use credit cards to pay for gas. The Washington Post reported on Sept. 25th that banks' fees for credit card purchases of gas have risen by 64 percent since last year, generating huge profit while forcing gas station owners to eat up more of the costs of processing fees, and leaving consumers paying higher and higher prices.

"Credit card companies are making 8 or 9 cents a gallon" off the fees, says Lenard.

Despite gorging on interchange fees, many large financial services companies face a cloudy future. Homeowners are using home equity loans to pay down debt and buy items usually reserved for credit cards, while cardholders are paying off their debts faster and in greater amounts. MBNA has already felt the backlash of lost revenue, leading to its buyout by Bank of America.

As one insider analyst put it in an interview with Reuters, "You've got consumers and merchants revolting. They're the two customers of this industry ... That's not good."

Goldstone theorizes that the rush to set up credit card companies for initial public offerings (IPOs) is a way for them to "throw off liability onto the consumer." As profits drop and consumer anger grows, "you'll see a lot of them running to the exit as quickly as possible."

Goldstone runs an online blog, WayTooHigh.com, which tracks the daily updates of the lawsuit. "Since this case started," he says, "I haven't received a single negative complaint."

Credit Card Companies Rocked By New Merchant Lawsuits...

Merchants Sue Credit Card Issuers Seeking Lower Fees


Claiming that unnecessarily high credit card transaction fees discriminate against small merchants and cost American families an average of $232 per year, a coalition of convenience stores, drug stores and community grocers has filed a class action suit against major banks and credit card associations.

The antitrust, class-action lawsuit charges that Visa, MasterCard, Bank of America, Citibank, Bank One, Chase Manhattan Bank, J.P. Morgan, Chase, Fleet Bank, Capital One, and other banks are engaging in collusive practices by setting credit card interchange fees at "supracompetitive" levels.

The suit's plaintiffs -- the National Association of Convenience Stores (NACS), the National Association of Chain Drug Stores (NACDS), the National Community Pharmacists Association (NCPA) and the National Cooperative Grocers Association (NCGA) -- represent hundreds of thousands of drug stores, convenience stores and food stores across the United States that accept Visa and MasterCard as a form of payment.

So-called "interchange fees" are the largest component of credit card fees and have a significant impact on American consumers, who are affected by U.S. interchange rates that are among the highest in the world.

Interchange rates cost the average American household approximately $232 a year in 2004, the lawsuit charges.

When consumers purchase goods or services with a credit card, the payment is processed through the merchant's bank and the bank that issued the consumer the credit card. The issuing bank charges the merchant's bank a fee to process the transaction. The merchant's bank then adds its own fee for processing the transaction, and passes on both of these fees -- collectively known as interchange -- to the merchant.

"The credit card interchange system serves as a hidden tax, both on merchants and consumers, and raises the costs of all products regardless of the form of tender," said Hank Armour, CEO of the National Association of Convenience Stores.

"These credit card interchange fees have rapidly increased over the past several years, despite efforts by individual convenience stores to control these costs or make the competitive market work," Armour said.

Interchange fees are meant to cover the cost of processing a credit card transaction and the risk taken by the issuing bank that the credit will not be repaid. However, the plaintiffs say that both fraud costs and the cost of processing are steadily decreasing, while U.S. interchange rates continue to increase.

Interchange fees are substantially higher in the United States than almost any other industrialized country. Other countries have taken action to address the market problem created by these monopolies. Recent changes in Australia and countries in Europe, for example, have decreased rates from about 0.95 percent to about 0.55 percent.

"Credit card interchange fees are the third-largest expense for many chain drug stores after rent and the cost of labor," said Craig Fuller, CEO of the National Association of Chain Drug Stores. "These costs have skyrocketed over the past years even though the costs of credit card transactions for the banks have fallen."

The suit's plaintiffs added they would seek damages and injunctive relief to stop the alleged anticompetitive practices of banks and credit card companies.

"We are not seeking some form of temporary relief; we are looking for long-term reform of the credit card interchange fee system," said John Rector, General Counsel of the National Community Pharmacists Association.

"The current system discriminates against small, independent businesspersons, and there is no basis for that discrimination. We ultimately seek a competitive and fair interchange fee system.

The suit was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York on Friday by Robins, Kaplan, Miller & Ciresi LLP.

Merchants Sue Credit Card Issuers Seeking Lower Fees...

Suit Challenges Credit Card Fees

A class action lawsuit filed by several small businesses accuses Citigroup, Bank of America and other large banks of illegally fixing the price of credit card transaction fees.

"Merchants have little or no ability to negotiate with Visa and MasterCard for lower interchange fees, and these fees are a hidden tax that raise prices paid by consumers for almost every product they buy," says attorney K. Craig Wildfang, representing the plaintiffs. "Visa, MasterCard and the banks now have the burden of proving that they have set the interchange fees at the correct competitive level. Even Visas own economists admit that they cannot satisfy this burden."

"For the average consumer, you have to pay $200 to $300 per year in additional costs for merchandise, whether you pay with plastic or in cash," Wildfang said. "It's like an invisible 2 percent sales tax on everything you buy."

"Interchange fees are just a way that credit card companies squeeze merchants to enhance their revenue stream," said Mitch Goldstone, President and CEO of 30 Minute Photos Etc. and 30minphotos.com, a national online boutique photo service.

"There is absolutely no need for these fees to be so high, and without anything to control them, the banks and the credit card companies continue to find ways to escalate the fees. We hope this lawsuit leads to significant changes," he said. Goldstone and co-owner Carl Berman write The Credit Card Interchange Blog, at www.waytoohigh.com.

"Due to Visa and MasterCards market power, the United States has the highest credit card interchange fees among industrialized countries," Wildfang said. "Regulatory authorities in many other countries, from the European Union to Australia, have recently adopted measures to reduce interchange fees, but in the United States, it will take action by the courts to accomplish this."

The suit concerns the fees charged by banks to merchants each time a customer makes a purchase using a MasterCard or Visa card, and charges that there is no limit on the banks' ability to set the "exorbitant" fees.

Paul Cohen, a vice president at Visa USA, said the company plans to defend the fees as a business practice that has been both successful in the marketplace and found to be legal in federal court.

The antitrust class action suit was filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Connecticut against Visa, MasterCard, Bank of America, Citibank, Bank One, Chase Manhattan Bank, JPMorgan Chase, Fleet Bank, Capital One and other major banks.

Named plaintiffs include, Photos Etc. Corporation, doing business as 30 Minute Photos Etc., of Irvine, CA; Traditions Classic Home Furnishings of St. Paul, MN; CHS Inc. of St. Paul, MN; A Dash Of Salt, L.L.C. of Bridgeport, CT; and KSARRA, L.L.C. of Newtown, CT.

They represent a class of merchants that operate millions of commercial businesses throughout the United States that accept Visa and MasterCard as a form of payment. At issue are the alleged practices by the defendants that cause merchants to pay allegedly excessive fees each time they accept a credit card as payment.

"The U.S. credit card system is seriously broken and mismanaged, and millions of merchants and consumers are unnecessarily paying for it through credit card interchange fees that are increasing at an alarming rate," said Michael Schumann, co-owner of Traditions Classic Home Furnishings, which operates retail furniture stores in St. Paul and Minneapolis, MN and Naples, FL. "This lawsuit will hopefully result in a much-needed major reform of the credit card industry."

In 2003, Wal-Mart negotiated a multibillion-dollar settlement with Visa and MasterCard over the use of the fees. Other large retailers are attempting to do the same but Wildfang's lawsuit says small businesses are helpless to negotiate on their own and must turn to the courts for relief.


Suit Challenges Credit Card Fees...

Senate Passes MBNA's Bankruptcy Bill

Credit card issuers, banks and even home builders are applauding the Senate's passage of a bankruptcy bill that would make it much more difficult for Americans devastated by illness, divorce or job loss to wipe out their debts. The House is poised to pass the measure, probably in early April, after the Easter recess.

Spurred on by support from such heavy financial backers as MBNA, Citigroup, JPMorgan Chase and Capital One Financial, the Senate beat back every amendment that would have cut any slack to members of the armed forces, those with serious medical problems and those working as unpaid caregivers to seriously ill or disabled family members

Senators even refused to show any sympathy to victims of identity theft.

The Senate has more sympathy for the wealthy, however. When Democrats tried to restrict the use of state laws that allow wealthy individuals to shelter their portfolios from creditors in several states, Republicans rejected it out of hand.

Not long ago, Democrats could be counted on to oppose turning the screws on low-income and middle-class Americans. In 2000, Congress passed a similar bill but then-President Clinton vetoed it.

This time around, things are different. Eighteen Democrats -- including both Democratic Senators from Delaware, MBNA's home state -- joined Republicans in voting for the measure. Senate Democratic Leader Harry Reid of Nevada also voted with the Republicans.

Many Democrats in the House are also eager to demonstrate their loyalty to the financial sector. The New Democrat Coalition endorsed bankruptcy reform in a letter to House Speaker Dennis Hastert (R-Ill.), urging that he bring the bill swiftly to the House floor.

"We believe that responsible bankruptcy reform embodies the New Democrat principles of personal responsibility, while at the same time adding important new consumer protections such as requiring enhanced credit card disclosure information and encouraging participation in consumer credit counseling," wrote coalition Chairwoman Ellen Tauscher (D-Calif.) and others.

With a straight face, the bill's supporters claim it will make it easier for low-income consumers to get loans.

"By reforming the system with this common-sense approach, more Americans -- especially lower-income Americans -- will have greater access to credit," President Bush said in a statement.

Sen. Edward Kennedy (D-Mass.) was among the outspoken opponents of the bill, which he said "sacrifices the hopes and dreams of average Americans to the rampant greed of the credit card industry."

"It turns the United States Senate into a collection agency for the credit card companies reaching the long arm of the law into the pocketbooks of average Americans who have reached the end of their economic rope," Kennedy said. "This legislation breaks the bond that unites America, the bond that makes our country strong. It says the concerns of low and middle income families don't matter. They no longer have a voice in the United States Senate. What matters is the special interests."

Proponents say the bill is needed to curb the five- fold increase in personal bankruptcy filings from less than 300,000 in 1980 to almost 1.6 million in 2003. Utah Republican Orrin Hatch said that the number of personal bankruptcy petitions filed each year exceeds the 10-year total during the Depression of the 1930s.

Bankruptcies cost "law-abiding, bill-paying citizens" an extra $400 a year because of people who stiff banks, credit-card companies and stores by erasing their debt, he said.


Credit card issuers, banks and even home builders are applauding the Senate's passage of a bankruptcy bill that would make it more difficult for Americans...

Minnesota Charges Capital One Ads Are Misleading

Anyone who watches TV has seen the commercial where a couple is making a large credit card purchase. At the same time, a hoard of barbarians begins to descend on them. When one spouse cautions that putting the purchase on a credit card will cost a lot in interest, the other says "It's OK, we're using our Capital One card." The barbarians stop and walk away, in utter dejection.

Cute commercial, but the state of Minnesota contends that basically, it's a lie.

Minnesota Attorney General Mike Hatch filed suit against Capital One Bank and Capital One F.S.B. for using false, deceptive and misleading television advertisements, direct-mail solicitations, and customer service telephone scripts to market credit cards with allegedly "low" and "fixed" interest rates that, unlike its competitors' rates, will never increase.

In fact, the lawsuit alleges that Capital One increases the interest rate on such cards up to 400% for consumers who trigger a "penalty" rate by defaulting in any number of ways.

"Capital One aggressively markets its brand image as the credit card company with the nation's lowest fixed rates," Hatch said. "But that image is false. If you do something as simple as pay a day late, your rate with Capital One can sky-rocket overnight."

The State's suit alleges that Capital One uses "penalty rate" pricing to offer a supposedly "fixed" interest rate to consumers, but then increases that rate when an individual account holder defaults. Capital One also retains the right to unilaterally increase an account holder's interest rate -- for any reason or for no reason at all -- based upon a "change in terms" provision in its credit card agreement.

Specifically, the lawsuit faults Capital One's marketing practice as follows:

? Television Ads Capital One runs television ads with the same basic format, script, graphics and visual punch line designed to create the false and deceptive impression among consumers that its competitors' rates will increase, but Capital One's rates will not. In Capital One's "No-Hassle" ads, for instance, two people compete to pay for lunch, one with a competitors' card, the other with a Capital One card which has a "low and fixed" rate. When the man with a competitor's card asks what's going to happen to his rate, he is physically shot upward by a catapult operated by barbarians or a breaching whale. Capital One then orally and visually tells consumers that it offers the nation's lowest fixed rate at 4.99%.

? Written Solicitations Capital One bolsters its false television ads with deceptive direct mail solicitations. In one solicitation, for instance, Capital One describes its 4.99% interest rate as "low" thirteen times and as "fixed" seventeen times, including on both sides of the envelope, in the body of the text, in the application itself and elsewhere, including boxes comparing the interest rates and "savings" of Capital One's credit cards with consumers' other loans.

? Customer Service Scripts When consumers contact Capital One to apply for the card, Capital One scripts its customer service representatives to evade a direct response to the question "What does fixed mean?" Capital One answers: "Unlike most credit card companies, Capital One's fixed rate is not variable and will not go up and down as interest rates change." Only if a consumer "probes" another two times does Capital One concede that it cannot guarantee that its rates will stay the same forever.

The state's lawsuit alleges that Capital One's marketing practices violate Minnesota's laws prohibiting false advertising, consumer fraud, and deceptive trade practices. The suit seeks injunctive relief prohibiting Capital One's false, deceptive and misleading conduct and civil penalties.

The defendants are Capital One Bank and Capital One F.S.B. Both are Virginia-based entities that offer credit card products to prime and subprime consumers. Capital One is one of the top ten largest credit card issuers in the United States. According to Capital One Financial Corporation's most recent Form 10-Q filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, Capital One's domestic credit card loans totaled $46.1 billion as of September 30, 2004. These loans generated net income of $414.4 million for July, August and September, 2004, a 50% increase from the same period in 2003.

Capital One's marketing expenses were $826.6 million from January through September, 2004. Capital One's solicitations claim that the company has 46 million customers.

Consumers who believe they were victimized by Capital One's practices may contact the Citizen Assistance Line of the Minnesota Attorney General's Office at 651-296-3353 or 1-800-657-3787.

Minnesota Attorney General Mike Hatch filed suit against Capital One Bank and Capital One F.S.B. for using false, deceptive and misleading television adver...

Wal-Mart Will Decline Some MasterCards

December 4, 2003
Wal-Mart will stop accepting some MasterCard debit-card transactions next year. Other retailers are likely to take similar measures as they digest the terms of a landmark lawsuit earlier this year.

It's likely to be a confusing development for consumers who have grown accustomed to the almost universal acceptance of Visa and MasterCard. At issue are the fees that merchants pay when they make purchases with Visa and MasterCard debit cards.

Merchants pay higher fees when consumers sign for their purchase rather than enter their PIN number at the point of sale.

The dispute does not affect "pure" credit cards. Rather, it centers around the "check cards," as they're often called, that deduct funds directly from consumers' checking accounts.

"We choose to eliminate the option rather than pass the costs on to our customers," a Wal-Mart spokesman said.

Wal-Mart was the lead plaintiff in a class-action lawsuit brought by retailers against MasterCard and Visa. The suit claimed the bank cards improperly forced merchants to swallow higher fees by requiring them to honor both credit and debit cards from Visa and MasterCard.

Wal-Mart says customers will still be able to use their MasterCard debit cards -- but you'll have to key in your PIN rather than sign for the transaction. The difference is that PIN transactions go through a different, lower-cost payment network.

The huge retailer has negotiated an arrangement with Visa under which it will continue to accept Visa debit cards on signature transactions but it didn't release details of the agreement.

Wal-Mart Will Decline Some MasterCards...

Visa, MasterCard To Pay $3 Billion in Debit Card Suit

Visa and MasterCard have agreed to pay $3 billion to settle a suit over debit-card fees filed by Wal-Mart, Sears and other large merchants. The companies will also stop requiring retailers to accept both their credit and debit cards and will lower their transaction fees by about $1 billion per year.

It's a clear win for big retailers, who will save from $1.5 billion to $2 billion annually in fees. It's a strategic win for the card companies, who saved themselves a lot of bad publicity if the case had gone to trial.

But is it a win for consumers? Both sides -- the stores and the card companies -- claimed to be fighting for the rights of consumers, but just how the settlement will help shoppers is open to debate.

"Consumers are the losers in all of this," said David Robertson of a credit card industry publication, the Nilson Report.

"It's a victory for both retailers and consumers because high fees have driven up the price of every product sold," said Mallory Duncan of the National Retail Federation.

Most analysts thought it unlikely that retail prices would drop as a result of the settlement, though it's possible that Wal-Mart and other discounters might shave a few cents off the average purchase.

Sears and Wal-Mart were barred from discussing the suit under a gag order issued by the court.

One thing everyone agrees on: the banks who make big money from debit fees -- J.P. Morgan Chase and Citigroup, among others -- will take a huge hit under terms of the settlement. That means they'll be looking for other ways to increase revenue, possibly through increased fees and interest rates.

In the class action suit on behalf of thousands of retailers, the stores argued that Visa and MasterCard unfairly required merchants to accept their debit cards, which require a customer's signature to verify a transaction. Retailers would rather use less expensive independent networks that clear debit-card purchases using a personal identification number (PIN).

Visa and MasterCard say the policy -- known to retailers as honor-all-cards -- increases consumer choice and offers better protection against fraud. The retailers say the higher fees wind up being passed on to consumers. The card companies charge transaction fees of about 1.7 percent for large retailers and about 2.5 percent for smaller ones.

The costs add up quickly for merchants. On a $100 purchase, a large retailer would pay 25 cents to 50 cents to clear a debit card purchase on a regional network, while it wuold pay about $1.75 to process it through Visa or MasterCard.

Visa, MasterCard To Pay $3 Billion in Debit Card Suit...

Visa, MasterCard Ordered to Refund Currency Conversion Fees

A California judge has ordered Visa and MasterCard to refund hundreds of millions of dollars of currency conversion fees. Judge Ronald Sabraw of California Superior Court said the 1 percent fee was not properly disclosed.

The ruling would require the companies to refund the currency conversion fees charged to all California consumers since Feb. 15, 1996. An attorney representing consumers said the amount could reach $800 million.

In making his ruling, the judge conceded that Visa and MasterCard have saved consumers millions by charging much lower currency conversion fees than other forms of payment. But he said that was "immaterial."

The credit card companies said they would appeal the decision and many analysts said they expected the California Court of Appeals to overturn Sabraw's finding. Sabraw's ruling followed a six-month trial in Oakland.

A similar case against American Express was recently filed on behalf of California consumers.

Another, potentially more far-reaching case is about to go to trial in New York federal court. In that case, giant retailers including Sears and Wal-Mart allege that Visa and MasterCard force merchants to take their debit as well as credit cards. Opening arguments are scheduled for April 28.

The currency conversion case is ironic in that few consumers are even aware that they were charged a fee for the conversions -- and many may have paid much more than one percent. The credit card companies do not itemize the fee on their statements and many banks routinely tack on another one or two percent, which might or might not appear as separate charges, depending on the bank.

Consumers will have to dig out their service agreements to find out if they are paying an addition fee to the bank that issued their credit card.

Both Visa and MasterCard are technically associations that provide transaction services to the banks who actually issue credit cards to their customers. The final decision on currency conversions and other fees rests with individual banks.

Visa, MasterCard Ordered to Refund Currency Conversion Fees...

UICI Completes Sale of United Credit National Bank

DALLAS, Sept. 29, 2000 -- /PRNewswire/ -- UICI (NYSE: UCI) (the "Company") today announced that it has completed its previously announced sale of substantially all of the non-cash assets associated with its United CreditServ credit card business, including its credit card receivables portfolios and its Sioux Falls, South Dakota servicing operations, for a cash sales price of approximately $124.0 million.

While the sales price was less than originally projected, the shortfall was offset by higher than projected cash collections on credit card receivables made through the closing of the sale. In addition to the cash sales price received at closing, the transaction contemplates an incentive cash payment contingent upon the post-closing performance of the ACE credit card portfolio over a one-year period. UICI continues to hold United CreditServ's building and real estate in Sioux Falls, South Dakota, and has leased the facilities to the purchaser pursuant to a long-term lease. UICI has also retained the right to collect approximately $250 million face amount of previously written off credit card receivables.

In connection with the sale, UICI or certain of its subsidiaries have retained substantially all liabilities associated with its credit card business, including liability for payment of all certificates of deposit issued by United Credit National Bank (an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of UICI), merchant holdback liabilities, liabilities associated with pending litigation and other contingencies. Following the sale, United Credit National Bank holds approximately $96.0 million in available cash, cash equivalents and short term U.S. Treasury securities and has approximately $79.0 million of certificates of deposits outstanding. United Credit National Bank has initiated a program to prepay all of its outstanding certificates of deposit and currently expects to discharge all such deposit liabilities on or before October 31, 2000. United Credit National Bank is in the process of preparing a formal voluntary plan of liquidation to be filed with and approved by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, and UICI currently anticipates that the voluntary liquidation of United Credit National Bank, including the provision for all remaining liabilities and distribution to UICI of all residual cash, will be complete on or before year-end.

"We are very pleased to have successfully completed this critical step in UICI's orderly withdrawal from the credit card business," commented Gregory T. Mutz, UICI's chief executive officer. "We look forward to formally closing United Credit National Bank by year-end and turning our full attention once again to the core businesses that have served our shareholders so well in the past."

Separately, UICI has learned that the plaintiffs in previously disclosed litigation have filed motions to compel UICI to, among other things, deposit a significant portion of the proceeds of the sale of UICI's credit card business in escrow under court supervision. UICI believes that the motions are wholly without merit and intends to oppose them vigorously.

UICI Completes Sale of United Credit National Bank...

United Credit National Bank - Consent Order

UICI (NYSE: UCI) today announced that United Credit National Bank (an indirect, wholly owned subsidiary of UICI) had agreed to the issuance of a Consent Order by the U.S. Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (the "OCC"). The terms of the Consent Order will govern for the indefinite future the capitalization, funding activities, growth and operations of United Credit National Bank (the "Bank"), a special purpose national bank headquartered in Sioux Falls, South Dakota.

The Consent Order requires the Bank within thirty days to submit to the OCC for approval a near term and three year capital plan, the terms of which will demonstrate the ability of the Bank to maintain Tier I capital at levels no less than 10% of risk weighted adjusted assets and 7% of actual adjusted total assets. The capital plan will also set forth the Bank's plans and projections for the maintenance and sources of adequate capital in future periods.

To immediately supplement the capital of the Bank and in order to maintain combined Tier I and Tier II capital at the Bank at a level in excess of 10% of total risk-weighted assets (as disclosed in the Bank's December 31, 1999 Call Report as currently filed with the OCC), United CreditServ, Inc. (the Bank's direct parent and a wholly owned subsidiary of UICI) contributed $10,065,000 in cash to the capital of the Bank on February 25, 2000. The OCC is currently conducting an ongoing examination of the operations and capital adequacy of the Bank, following the previous announcement by UICI in December 1999 of significant losses in the fourth quarter of 1999 attributable to charges to the credit card loan loss reserves at the Bank.

A liquidity and capital assurances agreement, dated May 15, 1998, provides that, upon demand by the Bank, UICI will purchase certificates of deposit issued by the Bank to assure sufficient liquidity to meet the Bank's funding demands and will contribute capital to the Bank sufficient for the Bank to comply with its stated policy of maintaining Tier I capital at a level equal to at least 10% of total risk-weighted assets and a total risk-based capital ratio of at least 12%. Total risk-based capital includes both Tier I and Tier II capital.

Under the terms of the Consent Order, the Bank is prohibited from accessing the brokered deposit market and from soliciting or accepting deposits over the Internet. The Bank had, as of February 21, 2000, voluntarily suspended soliciting or accepting brokered deposits. As of February 28, 2000, the Bank has $310 million of certificates of deposits outstanding, the majority of which are scheduled to mature over the next 12 months. At February 28, 2000, the Bank held approximately $125 million in cash, cash equivalents and short term U.S. Treasury securities.

The Consent Order requires the Bank, until further notice from the OCC, to cease all activities with American Credit Educators, Inc. (ACE) and American Fair Credit Association, Inc. (AFCA), independent marketing associations through which the Bank has marketed its credit card programs to customers with limited or impaired credit records. The Consent Order further requires the Bank, until further notice from the OCC, to cease all transactions with affiliated parties (including UICI but excluding Specialized Card Services, Inc., the servicer of the Bank's credit card accounts), and to conduct an immediate review of all agreements with all third parties to assess whether such agreements are on terms fair and reasonable to the Bank. The Bank, in particular, has engaged PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP to independently review the terms of all agreements between the Bank and Specialized Card Services, Inc. (an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of UICI and the servicer of the Bank's credit card accounts).

The Bank is further prohibited under the terms of the Consent Order from introducing new products or services, without accompanying policies and procedures reviewed and approved by the OCC providing for, among other things, appropriate risk management, internal control, management information and data processing systems. Under the terms of the Consent Order, the Bank is generally prohibited from increasing its assets in the future unless the OCC has approved a capital plan submitted by the Bank and the Bank is in compliance with the capital plan.

Separately, UICI announced that UICI and the Bank had been named as party defendants in separate suits filed in U.S. District Court in Colorado by American Credit Educators, Inc. (ACE) and American Fair Credit Association, Inc. (AFCA), the independent marketing associations through which the Bank formerly marketed its credit card programs. In the suits, ACE and AFCA have alleged, among other things, that UCNB has breached its marketing agreements with ACE and AFCA. ACE and AFCA are each controlled by Phillip A. Gray, the former head of UICI's credit card operations. Neither UICI nor the Bank has yet answered the complaints. UICI believes that UICI and the Bank have significant counterclaims and meritorious defenses to the allegations, and UICI intends to vigorously pursue the counterclaims and assert those defenses.

CORPORATE PROFILE:

UICI, headquartered in Dallas, Texas, is a diversified financial services company offering financial services, health administrative services and insurance through its various subsidiaries and divisions to niche consumer and institutional markets. UICI provides health insurance through its insurance subsidiaries, UGA-Association Field Services and Cornerstone Marketing of America; enrollment, billing and collection claims administration and risk management services for healthcare payors and providers through UICI Administrators; credit cards for individuals with no credit or troubled credit histories through United CreditServ; financial services and products for college, undergraduates and graduate students, including providing federally-guaranteed student loans through the Educational Finance Group; and manages blocks of life insurance and life insurance products to select markets through its OKC Division. UICI also holds a 44% interest in HealthAxis.com, Inc., a leading web-based insurance retailer providing fully integrated, end-to-end, web-enabled solutions for health insurance distribution and administration.

Under the terms of the Consent Order, the Bank is prohibited from accessing the brokered deposit market and from soliciting or accepting deposits over the ...

FTC Files Against Fraudulent Credit Card Protection Plans

WASHINGTON, Sept. 14, 1999 -- In a crackdown on fraudulent credit card protection schemes, the Federal Trade Commission today filed complaints against two Arizona-based companies and announced a settlement with a third company in Montreal that provides for the payment of $100,000 in consumer redress. 

According to the FTC, the companies misrepresented their identities to consumers while telemarketing their "services," misled consumers by telling them that they were not currently protected against credit card fraud, and claimed that if the consumers did not purchase their services they could be held fully liable for all unauthorized charges made with their cards. Finally, two of the companies posted unauthorized charges to consumers' credit card accounts.

"Under federal law, the maximum amount for which a consumer can be held liable for charges they didn't authorize is $50," Jodie Bernstein, Director of the FTC's Bureau of Consumer Protection said.

"These companies took advantage of students, seniors, and others scared into thinking they were vulnerable. The consumers were misled by telemarketers, spent their hard-earned money and got nothing in return."

Also as part of the sweep announced today, the FTC implemented a major consumer education campaign designed to alert consumers of their credit card rights. This campaign includes the distribution of a Consumer Alert fact sheet that provides important information on credit card loss protection offers, along with a brochure and bookmark with information on fair credit billing and a cooperative effort with the AARP, which plans to make credit card loss protection its primary education effort for the month of September. 

In addition, in an attempt to reach out to college students who may be receiving their first exposure to credit cards, the FTC is currently working with the National Association of College Stores (NACS) to distribute over one million of the Credit Rules bookmarks along with students' book purchases. 

According to the FTC complaints, the companies used telemarketers to contact consumers offering what they claimed was credit card protection against loss, theft or Y2K-related problems. To avoid the perception that the company was making "cold calls," the telemarketers allegedly told consumers that they were calling from Visa or Mastercard, depending on which credit card the consumer had. 

They then said that criminals have been stealing credit card numbers via the Internet or other technology, and that consumers need additional protection because they are not currently covered against unauthorized use. 

The complaints allege that the companies claimed that the service they were providing would protect consumers from liability due to unauthorized credit card charges. 

Finally, in other instances, the telemarketers claimed that because of the Y2K computer bug, consumers would be exposed to credit card fraud, which could be prevented by purchasing similar protection services. In fact, federal law limits loss due to unauthorized credit card charges to $50 (a fee that is sometimes waived by the credit card company).

Further, the complaints allege that the telemarketers persuaded consumers to divulge their complete credit card numbers by reciting parts of their credit card numbers and requesting the remainder or by claiming to be verifying the consumers' identification or to be changing "security codes" on the consumers' credit cards. Using the credit card numbers, the complaints allege, the companies caused charges to be posted on the consumers' credit card bills without their consent or charged consumers fees ranging from approximately $200 to $400 for protection "services" that did not exist.

The FTC filed its actions in its Credit Card Protection Sweep against:

Source One Publications, Inc., an Arizona corporation; and Courtney Wiggs, individually and as an officer of Source One Publications, Inc. For alleged violations of the Federal Trade Commission Act (FTC Act) and the FTC's Telemarketing Sales Rule (TSR), the Commission is seeking to obtain a preliminary injunction, permanent injunctive relief, consumer redress recission or reformation of contracts, and other equitable relief; 

Liberty Direct, Inc., and The Ascendix Group, Inc., Arizona corporations; and Paul L. Wiggs and David C. Furnia, individually and as officers of Liberty Direct, Inc. and The Ascendix Group, Inc. For alleged violations of the FTC Act and the TSR, the Commission is seeking to obtain permanent injunctive relief, consumer redress, recission or reformation of contracts, and other equitable relief; and 

Credit Mart Financial Strategies, Inc., and Maurice Verrelli, individually and as an officer of Credit Mart Financial Strategies, Inc. for alleged violations of the FTC Act and the TSR. In this matter, a stipulated consent decree has been reached that will provide for settlement of the Commission's charges, injunctive relief and the payment of $100,000 in consumer redress by the defendants. 

FTC files against fraudulent credit card protection plans...

Reading Your Credit Report -- the Devil's in the Details

OK, so you've got your credit report. Now you have to read it over and analyze it carefully for any errors, discrepancies, or data you didn't know about. Most credit reports are broken down into the following categories:

• Personal Information This includes your name, address, Social Security number, and so on. Make sure all of this is correct and up-to-date. Credit problems and identity-theft scams often occur simply because credit agencies don't know where you live or where you work.

• Account Information or Credit Summary This is the rundown of your credit history, past and present. Any store cards (Banana Republic, Target, Wal-Mart) or credit cards appear on this record, even if they're closed. (Debit or ATM cards do not show up on credit reports, since using them draws directly from your bank account.) Check each account record for things like late payments, unpaid balances, and such. Make sure you have the card or account number handy -- the report will cross out some of the digits, and the CRA will not provide it to you if you request, thus requiring you to contact the merchant or bank personally.

• Inquiries Inquiries can be broken down into "hard" and "soft" categories.

"Hard" inquiries are requests from vendors, banks, rental agencies, etc., for your credit history. Too many of these in a short span of time can actually downgrade your overall credit rating, so be very careful when shopping for a credit card or looking for a new place to live. Don't allow anyone to pull your credit unless you're absolutely sure it's solid, or you really want what they're offering.

"Soft" inquiries include promotions from vendors, pre-approved credit offers, and your own personal credit checks. Those do not cause you any difficulty, and you can check your own report as often as you can afford it.

• Public Records These cover bankruptcies, judgments, tax liens, and other government-related notices that affect your credit.

• Collections The nastiest section of all, this covers any repossessions, collection agencies or unpaid debts you may have or have had. These can stay on your reports for up to seven years, so that one unpaid utility bill from four years ago can still hurt you.

• Dispute File Information Here you can initiate a challenge to the CRA for them to update your records, remove inaccurate information, and so on. Despite what "credit repair agencies" may tell you, accurate negative information can't be easily removed, so don't try unless you are negotiating personally with a CRA. You can begin a dispute via email, phone, fax, or regular mail, and each agency provides listings of who to contact.

Next: Credit Scoring -- The Fickleness of FICO



Reading Your Credit Report: Devil's in the Details...

Buying a Car with Bad Credit - How Bad is Bad?

So what's good and what's bad? Generally speaking, scores above 700 are excellent, scores in the 600 to 700 range are okay and scores between 500 and 600 are bad news.

If your score is at the bottom of this range, don't despair. Given the big growth in "subprime" (bad credit) lending, there's a finance company willing to issue your auto loan in each of those credit categories. In fact, according to consulting firm J.D. Power and Associates, dealers expect to sell to more subprime borrowers than ever next year.

On the other hand, it's best not to kid yourself about rates. Though rates vary somewhat depending on what part of the country you live in, you should expect to pay roughly 15 percent to 17 percent interest rates if your FICO score falls between 500 and 600.

While you may not have time to wait until you've dealt with your current credit issues, interest rates drop, of course, as you climb up the FICO rating scale.

If you do have a bit of time, you may want to check your report for some of the "dealkiller" entries which have the worst effect on your FICO score. For example, you may want to be sure that any closed accounts show as closed rather than delinquent. (You probably won't be surprised to hear that banks don't like to lend to people who are currently behind on their payments to other lenders.)

While the wrangling sometimes takes longer, under the Fair Credit Reporting Act the credit bureaus are supposed to verify any negative information within 30 days and send the updated information to other bureaus as well. The Federal Consumer Information Center offers a sample dispute letter which you can use to initiate the process.

Buying a Car with Bad Credit - How Bad is Bad?...

Your Debts, Your Rights - Which States Allow Taping of Calls

These states do allow you to secretly tape phone calls:

AlabamaNebraska
AlaskaNevada
ArizonaNew Jersey
ArkansasNew Mexico
ColoradoNew York
District of ColumbiaNorth Carolina
GeorgiaNorth Dakota
HawaiiOhio
IdahoOklahoma
IndianaRhode Island
IowaSouth Carolina
KansasTennessee
KentuckyTexas
LouisianaUtah
MaineVirginia
MinnesotaWest Virginia
MississippiWisconsin
MissouriWyoming

In 15 other states, you can tape with permission -- since it is highly unlikely that the collector wants to be on tape, she or he may just hang up.



Your Debts, Your Rights - Which States Allow Taping of Calls...

Advance Fee Loan Crackdown

For Release: August 12, 1999

FTC and States Launch Another Crackdown on Telemarketers Offering Credit Cards and Loans That Never Arrive

In another aggressive sweep targeting corporations and individuals that promise loans and credit cards for an advance fee, but never deliver them, the Federal Trade Commission, state Attorneys General from six states and state banking officialstoday announced the results of the latest crackdown on telemarketing companies and individuals allegedly engaging in advance fee loan scams. This sweep also includes the participation of Canadian law enforcement authorities who have taken criminal actions against Canadian advance fee loan scam operators who prey on American citizens. "OPERATION ADVANCE FEE LOAN (AFL)" - a multi-agency law enforcement sweep against telemarketers of fraudulent advance fee credit schemes - is a follow-up to two previous sweeps announced in 1996 and 1997. "Operation AFL" involves eight cases filed and/or settled by the Commission, and ten cases filed by state Attorney Generals, including three cease and desist orders issued by state banking officials.

"Advance fee loan scams are especially appalling because they prey on the most vulnerable consumers who are in need of credit or a loan," said Jodie Bernstein, Director of the FTC's Bureau of Consumer Protection. "Working with the states and our Canadian partners, we are stopping lenders who illegally charge consumers a fee for the promise of a loan. Our message to these disreputable lenders is, we will track you down and stop your illegal practices. Our message to consumers is, don't pay for a promise - it's illegal for lenders to ask you to pay for credit before you get it."

According to the FTC, fraudulent advance fee loan schemes prey on particularly vulnerable consumers - the unemployed, the working poor, those who have bad credit ratings, or those in immediate need of money for emergencies. Most advance fee loan telemarketers snare consumers through cold calls, or in response to advertisements in various local newspapers, on cable television, on the Internet and through direct mail. Ads promising "money to loan ... regardless of credit history" lure consumers into paying fees that range from $25 to several hundred dollars in advance of receiving "guaranteed" loans. In many instances, consumers never receive the promised loans or credit cards, and either never hear from the loan companies again or are merely sent credit card applications.

Under the FTC's Telemarketing Sales Rule, which went into effect December 31, 1995, a telemarketer who guarantees consumers a loan or other form of credit, or who claims he or she can arrange such credit for a consumer, is prohibited from asking consumers to pay any money before they receive the loan or credit. The rule empowers each of the state Attorneys General to file actions in federal District Court and seek an order that applies nationwide against violators of the rule. Some of the cases announced today (see attached list) allege rule violations, others allege violations of the FTC Act or state laws that prohibit unfair or deceptive practices. These latest law enforcement actions show a continuing coordinated effort among domestic and international law enforcement agencies to combat such fraud.

In all of the FTC cases announced today, the defendants were charged with violating the FTC Act and the Telemarketing Sales Rule (TSR) by misrepresenting that consumers would receive a credit card for an advance fee; by charging a fee in advance of consumers receiving the promised credit card; and in two of the cases, misrepresenting that consumers would receive a refund of their fee if they did not get the promised credit card.

ADVANCE FEE LOAN SWEEP LAW ENFORCEMENT

The FTC filed its actions against:

American Consumer Membership Services, Inc., and Darryl Smith, alleging that the defendants fraudulently telemarketed, through cold calls, advance fee credit cards to low income consumers and those with credit problems. After paying a $69 fee, which was debited from their checking accounts, consumers received vouchers, coupons and other offers, and occasionally credit card applications with lists of banks to apply to for secured or unsecured credit cards, with additional application fees ranging from $20 to $79.95. Some consumers received nothing at all from the defendants after their checking accounts were debited. Few received the promised refunds.

1263523 Ontario, Inc., doing business as Consumer Credit Services, Donald M. Davies, Lloyd Charles Prudenza and David Seymour Wells, alleging that the defendants telemarketed advance fee credit cards to consumers with poor credit histories, for an up-front fee of $159 that also was debited from their checking accounts. Consumers never received the promised credit cards. If they received anything from the company at all, it was information on how to improve their credit rating, lists of banks that market secured credit cards, and/or bundles of worthless coupons. Most of the consumers never received a refund.

Modern Credit Financial Services, Inc., Matthew A. Hammack and Robert Hansel, alleging that the defendants, through cable tv ads and telemarketing, promised advance fee credit cards for $89, payable through a bank draft from their checking accounts. After making the payment, consumers received materials on credit management, a 100 percent guarantee certificate, and information about the two banks that were supposed to issue the credit cards. Additional requirements and charges were imposed if the consumer attempted to apply to the banks for the credit cards. Most consumers did not receive a credit card or a refund.

Credit National, Inc. and Mark Wolf, doing business as Credit America, alleging that the defendants marketed "guaranteed approved" credit cards and lines of credit to consumers in print and Internet ads, as well as via direct mail, for a $28 "application fee" and invited consumers to call an "800" number. Consumers who called the number in response to the ads were sent a packet of materials containing written guarantees of unsecured credit cards regardless of past credit history, along with applications requiring the $28 fee. Consumers who responded by sending the fee received various credit card applications or nothing at all, rather than the promised credit cards.

At the request of the FTC, the federal District Courts in three of the four cases have issued temporary restraining orders to halt the deceptive practices and freeze the defendants' assets pending trial. In American Consumer Membership Services, the FTC has filed a motion for a preliminary injunction, and a hearing has been scheduled for August 27, 1999.

The Commission also announced today that staff had obtained three default judgments against advance fee loan telemarketers in Georgia, Concepts and Ideas, Source One, Inc., and GBS Group, and reached a settlement agreement with another advance fee loan company, Franklin Credit Services, Inc..

In an earlier proceeding, the FTC, in conjunction with the state of Arkansas, brought an action against SureCheK Systems, Inc., alleging that SureChek was engaged in a deceptive scheme to defraud consumers nationwide through the telemarketing of advance fee credit cards. In addition, the FTC brought separate actions against Bill Owen d/b/a Source One; George B. Schewe, d/b/a GBS Group; and Jarrell Andre Goolsby d/b/a Concepts & Ideas. Defendants Owen, Schewe, and Goolsby provided third-party telemarketing (Op AFL--08/12/99) services to the defendants in the SureCheK matter. These telemarketers solicited business on behalf of SureCheK, using SureCheK's name, and while under contract with and utilizing scripts provided by SureCheK, misrepresented that consumers would receive a major credit card in exchange for an advance fee with absolutely no security deposit, regardless of their past credit history. Despite paying the fee, the consumers did not receive the credit cards as promised.

The Southeast Regional Office (located in Atlanta) of the FTC also brought an earlier action against Loan byPhone Financing, Inc., d/b/a Burlington Credit Services; Action Credit Services, Inc.; ABCO, Inc.; Beaumont Credit Services, Inc.; Budget Credit Services, Inc.; Hunter Credit Corporation; Jodi Wolin; and Laurence J. Smith, Esq. According to the FTC, the defendants sold a "debt consolidation" service, and consumers who called were led to believe that the company was offering low interest loans to enable consumers to consolidate their debts. Consumers were told that, after an initial sign-up "origination fee," the company would pay off the consumers' debts, leaving consumers with only the monthly loan payment. Contrary to the representations made during the call, the defendants did not provide a loan to the consumer, nor did they pay off the outstanding debts. In the proposed consent orders to settle the charges, the defendants would be banned from engaging in, or assisting others engaged in, any credit related services, and would be prohibited from making the representations alleged in the complaint. Under the terms of her proposed settlement, defendant Wolin, who created the scheme and formed the corporations used to further it, would pay consumer redress totaling approximately $185,000. Defendant Smith would pay $10,000 in redress over a period of 18 months.

James Michael Christensen, principal owner of Franklin Credit Services, Inc., and Amansco Credit Services, Inc., has agreed to pay $100,000 for consumer redress or disgorgement, and agreed to be permanently banned from telemarketing as part of an agreement with the FTC. Christensen and his companies purportedly offered low-interest, debt consolidation loans for a one-time fee. Instead of receiving a loan, consumers were offered a bill paying service that required them to pay an additional fee, the FTC alleged. The proposed settlement, which requires the court's approval, would prohibit Christensen from: accepting fees in advance when representing a high likelihood that a person will be receiving a loan or other extension of credit; making certain misrepresentations and non-disclosures in marketing credit and credit-related goods or services; and selling or transferring customer lists. On June 7, 1999, a default judgment was entered against corporate defendants Franklin Credit and Amansco Credit.

U.S. military personnel and their families were targeted by the advance fee loan con artists through advertisements for these scams that appear in civilian newspapers circulated on U.S. military bases. "We are pleased to be able to work with the armed services in putting a stop to the despicable practice of targeting scams at the military community," Bernstein said.

CANADIAN LAW ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITY

Under The Loan Brokers Act of Ontario, enacted in1994, the Ministry of Consumer and Commercial Relations ("MCCR") for the Government of Ontario was authorized to bring criminal charges against unscrupulous "up front fee loan scam companies" and their owners. Within the past two years, the Investigation Unit of MCCR has worked with the Royal Canadian Mounted Police, the Milton Detachment and Toronto Police Services Fraud Squad to close down over 120 of the fraudulent advance fee loan companies operating in Canada and marketing to Canadian and U.S. consumers, and to return thousands of dollars in advance fees.

In the last three months, the following Canadian advance fee loan companies, all located in Toronto, Ontario, have been shut down by Canadian law enforcement authorities in conjunction with the Commission's sweep: Belmont Associates, Berkley Associates, Northwind Traders, Starline Traders, Globe Securities, Q.A. Marketing, and North Star Trading. Each of these companies promoted advance fee loans via telephone to American citizens exclusively, and they and their owners were charged with criminal fraud. Their cases are now pending before the Canadian courts.

OPERATION AFL CONSUMER EDUCATION

The FTC and the state Attorneys General, along with our education campaign partners, The American Financial Services Association Education Foundation, The National Association of Consumer Agency Administrators, and The Navy Personnel Command, offer the following tips for consumers to keep in mind before responding to ads that promise easy credit, regardless of credit history:

  • Legitimate lenders never "guarantee" or say that you are likely to get a loan or a credit card before you apply, especially if you have bad credit, no credit, or a bankruptcy;

  • If you apply for a real estate loan, it is accepted and common practice for lenders to request payment for a credit report or appraisal;

  • Never give your credit card account number, bank account information, or Social Security Number over the telephone or Internet unless you are familiar with the company and know why the information is needed; and

  • If you don't have the credit offer in hand - or confirmed in writing - and you are asked to pay, don't do it. It's fraud and it's against the law.

The Commission is also alerting commercial mail receiving agents (e.g., Mail Boxes, Etc.), often used as "mail drops" by advance fee loan scam operators, that they may be involved in a fraudulent scheme when they are asked by a mailbox holder to forward large volumes of mail to other addresses within the United States or to other countries. Additionally, the FTC is writing to more than 7500 publishers of classified ads through the country to encourage them to warn their readers that ads promising loans or extensions of credit are likely to be scams.

The FTC's Northeast Regional Office (located in New York) coordinated this project for the FTC.

The Commission votes to file the four complaints in the appropriate federal district court were 4-0. American Consumer Membership Services was filed in the U.S. District Court, Northern District of New York, in Binghamton, NY on August 5, 1999. Consumer Credit Services was filed in the U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York, in New York City on August 5, 1999. Modern Credit Financial Services, Inc. was filed in the U.S. District Court, Northern District of Texas, Dallas Division, on August 5, 1999; and Credit National was filed in the U.S. District Court, Central District of California, Western Division, in Los Angeles, on August 5, 1999. The settlement in the matter of Franklin Credit was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida, Ft. Lauderdale Division, on August 10, 1999. The Commission vote to file the settlement was 4-0.


NOTE: The Commission files a complaint when it has "reason to believe" that the law has been or is being violated, and it appears to the Commission that a proceeding is in the public interest. The complaint is not a finding or ruling that the defendants have actually violated the law. The case will be decided by the court.

NOTE: A consent decree, such as in the Franklin Credit matter, is for settlement purposes only and does not constitute an admission by the defendant of a law violation. Consent decrees have the force of law when signed by the judge.

Copies of the news release are available from the FTC's web site at http://www.ftc.gov and copies of the consumer education materials, as well as the complaints, are also available from the FTC's Consumer Response Center, Room 130, 600 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20580; 202-FTC-HELP (202-382-4357); TDD for the hearing impaired 202-326-2502. To find out the latest news as it is announced, call the FTC NewsPhone recording at 202-326-2710.

MEDIA CONTACT:
Office of Public Affairs
202-326-2180

American Consumer Membership Services
Consumer Credit Services 
(FTC File No. 992 3031; Civil Action No. 99 CV 1206 -- American Consumer Membership)
(FTC File No. 992 3036; Civil Action No. 99 CV 8679 -- Consumer Credit Services)

Rhonda McLean or Robin E. Eichen or Carole Paynter
Northeast Regional Office
One Bowling Green, Suite 318
New York, New York 10004
212-607-2811

Modern Credit Financial Service
(FTC File No. 992 3218; Civil Action No. 3-99 CV 1756-G -- Modern Credit Financial Services)

Thomas Carter or Gary Kennedy
Southwest Regional Office
1999 Bryan Street, Suite 2150
Dallas, Texas 75201
214-979-9350 or 214-979-9379

Credit National
(FTC File No. 992 3223; Civil Action No. 99 CV 07989 -- Credit National)

Thomas Syta or Bret Smart
Western Regional Office
10877 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 700
Los Angeles, California 90024
310-824-4324 or 310-824-4366

Franklin Credit
(FTC File No. 982 3550 Civil Action No. 98 CV 7375-G -- Franklin Credit)

Andrea Foster or Ronald Laitsch
Southeastern Regional Office
Suite 5M35, Midrise Bldg., 60 Forsyth Street, S.W.
Atlanta, Georgia 30303
(404) 656-1356 or (404) 656-1358
CANADIAN CONTACTS:
Helen Czerniak or Dermot Jennings
Ministry of Consumer and Commercial Relations
250 Yonge Street
Toronto, ON
Canada M5B 2N5
(416) 326-8623 or (416) 326-8625

(Operation AFL)

ConsumerAffairs.Com complaints about Telemarketers...

Credit Scoring: The Fickleness of FICO

The most important aspect of a credit report is credit scoring. Your credit score is a number (usually three digits) that indicates your overall ranking and potential to lenders, creditors, et cetera. The score is created from a mathematical formula developed by the Fair Isaac Corporation, or "FICO score" for short.

For reasons known only to them and the Powers That Be, each credit agency uses its own variant on the FICO score, calculated in essentially the same fashion. Therefore, you can have three or four different credit scores -- a different score with each CRA, and yet another differing score from FICO. The Equifax agency recently entered into a partnership with the FICO site, myFICO.com, to provide the most accurate scoring record possible via their "Score Watch" product, but even their combined score can differ from Equifax's own reported scores.

The scores between FICO and the three agencies can vary widely -- I've seen differences of 25 to 100 points between individual scores. If the notion of a completely random system of mathematical calculations that has no set standard, and is governed by one company only, frightens you, well, it should.

Your credit score can change daily, based on a multitude of factors. Inquiries into your report can raise or lower it, as mentioned earlier. How often you use your credit card, or even if you have one, can impact your score. Being turned down for a loan or credit can cause your score to take a serious dive, particularly if you apply for too many loans or cards in too small a space of time.

If you want to get a rough estimate of your credit score without having to pay through the nose, many of the aforementioned CRA's and consumer sites offer "free scoring estimators" that provide just that -- a rough estimate of your credit score based on the data you input. Keep in mind that these estimators often have pre-selected conditions of data. Bankrate's scoring estimator, for instance, presumes that you already have credit cards and/or loans to pay off, so if you don't, it won't provide you with anything resembling an accurate score.

Next: Credit Knowledge -- A Long, Hard, Struggle

Credit Scoring: The Fickleness of FICO...

Escape From the Plastic Prison

By Martin H. Bosworth
ConsumerAffairs.com

Credit. It's one of the foundations of our consumer culture. Everyone knows what it is in principle -- you ask for something you need when you don't have the money to pay for it, and set up an agreement to pay for it later. Credit cards, bank loans, auto loans, home loansall of these transactions stem from that same simple foundation. Yet when it comes to truly understanding credit and how it works -- and how it can dramatically affect your future -- Americans are almost totally clueless.

You see it every day. Sometimes it's a horror story regarding a poor schmoe that ran up $60,000 in credit card bills, across five different cards, and had to declare bankruptcy before even beginning to pay them off. Sometimes it's that horrified expression you see in the mirror when you open your latest Discover card bill and find out you owe an extra $100 on a charge of $50, due to an unnoticed change in the creditor's terms. And sometimes it's that false cluck of sympathy from a bank officer who turned you down for a loan because of a mistaken charge on your credit report.

In a speech to the Jumpstart Coalition from April 2003, Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan remarked that "[c]ertainly, young adults have access to credit at a much earlier age than their parents did. Accordingly, they need a more comprehensive understanding of credit than was afforded to the previous generation -- including the impact of compounding interest on debt balances and the implications of mismanaging credit accounts Improving basic financial education at the elementary and secondary school level will provide a foundation of financial literacy that can help prevent younger people from making poor decisions that can take years to overcome."

And yet, we stumble along, blind lemmings being led by every catchy tune from banks, debt counselors, and credit repair agencies ... anyone who claims they can help us out of our bad financial straits. For a reasonable fee, of course.

In my struggle to fix my credit problems and build a real financial plan, I came across a plethora of useful information that simply isn't getting out to the general public, particularly the marketing goldmine of the 18-34 age brackets.

We're a generation raised on instant acquisition and the "buy now, pay later" ethic. "Why carry cash? I can pay with plastic!" is the cry, and it's answered by a slew of eager-beaver banks ready to make money off your spending habits.

In order to be a smarter shopper and a more informed consumer, you have to know what you're dealing with, what problems you may face, and how to fix them. Financial knowledge may not be sexy or edgy, but knowing all the lyrics to Ludacris' latest isn't going to win you a home loan, approve you a credit card, or pay off those late bills.

This article will review a few important things you can learn regarding the world of credit, and your place in it.

Escape From the Plastic Prison: Understanding Your Credit and Knowing Your Rights...

Consumer complaints about Net 1st National Bank

Harold, an alert reader sent us the pitch from something called Net 1st National Bank and the complaints have been rolling in ever since.

PUT CREDIT WOES BEHIND
Net 1st National

Having a hard time getting your first credit card? Tired of explaining past credit problems? If so, it's time to sign up with Net 1st National Bank. You can establish or re-establish your credit with us, and have access to fast cash at over 463,000 ATM's. Put credit card woes behind you and step into summer with a new credit Card in your pocket from Net 1st National Bank! What are you waiting for? Get approved NOW!

So I thought I would investigate it. When I went to the above URL I was sent to the following URL
http://www.1st-netcard.com

What really peaked my interest is their terms and conditions.(Below) What a way to end up $600 in debt for nothing!

Thanks, Harold. We agree. Anyone accepting this offer immediately is up the limit on their credit card and almost certain to fall immediately behind, thus accruing interest, penalties, etc. and being $1,000 in debt in no time. More consumers need to read the fine print. The excerpts below -- especially the fee schedule in the last paragraph -- would be a good starting point.

Terms & Conditions
Net 1st National Bank KFS MasterCard Program. A refundable $500 Reservation Fee is payable to KFS (the "Reservation Fee") in connection with the opening of your account. The Reservation Fee will be charged to your credit card account and will fully utilize your initial $500 credit limit. Before you may use your card or account to make purchases or to obtain cash advances, you must make payments on your account. The difference between the total unpaid balance and your credit limit will be the amount of credit available to you.

Reservation Fee Refund Policy. This program is offered through Key Financial Systems, Inc. ("KFS"). KFS is not affiliated with Net 1st National Bank, the issuer of the Net 1st National Bank MasterCard. If you choose to close your account, the KFS Reservation Fee refund will be credited to your MasterCard Account. If the posting of the $500 Reservation Fee refund results in a credit balance, the credit amount will be refunded to you.

Renewal Criteria. Net 1st National Bank will renew your KFS MasterCard account for successive one-year periods until (i) you direct Net 1st National Bank to close your account, or (ii) Net 1st National Bank otherwise closes your account in accordance with the terms of the Cardholder Agreement.

Graduation Criteria. After 24-months, Net 1st National Bank will review your KFS MasterCard account for a new standard, unsecured MasterCard Account based upon the current bank policy existing at that time. In order to qualify you must avoid taking any action, or failing to take any action on your KFS MasterCard account that causes you to be in default under the terms of the Cardholder Agreement. This includes but is not limited to: (i) You must have made all your monthly payments on or before the due date; and (ii) Your credit card account must not be overlimit at the time of your graduation review; and (iii) You have not become the subject of any insolvency or bankruptcy proceeding.

Acceptance. Your credit card account will be opened by Net 1st National Bank of Boca Raton, Florida. Use of the card issued in connection with your account will confirm your acceptance of the Terms and Conditions of the Net 1st National Bank Cardholder Agreement that will be sent to you along with your Welcome Letter. You agree to be responsible for all charges to your account according to the terms of the Cardholder Agreement. You understand that the terms of your account are subject to changes as provided in the Cardholder Agreement.

MEMBERSHIP FEES
ANNUAL FEE*: $96 PER YEAR
*The Annual Fee is payable monthly, $8 per month.
TRANSACTION FEE FOR PURCHASES : NONE
TRANSACTION FEES FOR CASH ADVANCES: THE GREATER OF $2 OR 3%

Application Processing Fee (a one-time non-refundable fee): $89.95; $109.95 for a joint cardholder (if applicable). Net 1st will generate a one-time electronic debit within the next business day from your checking account based on the information you provide us with.

Refundable Reservation Fee: A $500 Refundable Reservation Fee will be charged to your credit card account.

Credit Card Fees: Transaction Fee for Cash Advances: the greater of $2 or 3% of the Cash Advance; Late Payment Fee: $25; Over Limit Fee: $25; Check Returned Fee: $20; Reinstatement Fee: $20.

Put credit card woes behind you and step into summer with a new credit Card in your pocket from Net 1st National Bank! What are you waiting for? Get approv...

Your Debts, Your Rights - What Bill Collectors Can't Do

There are a number of debt-collection practices prohibited by law. They include:

Harassment and abuse:

• The use or threats or violence;
• The use of obscene or profane language;
• The publication of a list of consumers who allegedly refuse to pay debts, except to a consumer reporting agency or others with a legitimate need to know;
• The advertisement for sale of any debt to coerce payment of the debt;
• Causing a telephone to ring or engaging any person in telephone conversation repeatedly or continuously with intent to annoy, abuse, or harass any person at the called number;
• The placement of telephone calls without meaningful disclosure of the caller's identity.

False or misleading representations. Debt collectors may not:

• Falsely imply that they are attorneys or government representatives;
• Falsely imply that you have committed a crime;
• Falsely represent that they operate or work for a credit bureau;
• Misrepresent the amount of your debt;
• Indicate that papers being sent to you are legal forms when they are not; or indicate that papers being sent to you are not legal forms when they are;
• Claim that you will be arrested if you do not pay your debt;
• Say that they will seize, garnish, attach, or sell your property or wages, unless the collection agency or creditor intends to do so, and it is legal to do so; or
• Claims that actions, such as a lawsuit, will be taken against you, when such action legally may not be taken, or when they do not intend to take such action.
• Give false credit information about you to anyone, including a credit bureau;
• Send you anything that looks like an official document from a court or government agency when it is not; or
• Use a false name.

Unfair practices. Collectors may not:

• Collect any amount greater than you owe, unless your state law permits a special charge for such collections;
• Deposit a post-dated check prematurely;
• Use deception to make you accept collect calls or pay for telegrams;
• Take or threaten to take your property unless this can be done legally; or
• Contact you by postcard.

What control do you have over payment of debts?
If you owe more than one debt, any payment you make must be applied to the debt you indicate. A debt collector may not apply a payment to any debt you believe you do not owe.

Next: Stop the madness



Your Debts, Your Rights - What Bill Collectors Can't Do...

Credit Bureaus: Who You're Dealing With

First and most importantly, the consumer needs to know everything they can about credit reporting agencies (CRA's). CRA's are the national agencies that monitor every consumer's credit purchases, their loan histories, and so on.

Every time you use a credit card, apply for a loan, owe a debt, or miss a payment, a report is generated by that action to one of these agencies. Each agency maintains its own profile of your credit history, personal information, public files, and so on. That information can be requested by banks, landlords, brokers, and any sort of business that wants to find out about you.

There are three major credit agencies in the United States: Equifax, Experian, and Trans Union.

Each agency has differing information about consumers on their records, often resulting in inaccurate or out-of-date information. For example, let's say you were paying off an auto loan, and you closed it in May of 2004. Equifax might note that on its report and mark it down, but Trans Union does not. Therefore, if you apply for a credit card, and the bank contacts Trans Union for your credit report, they might turn you down because you still have an open car loan ... even though you don't.

This is a simplified instance, but don't doubt that things like this do happen. Each credit agency makes the claim that they do not communicate, thus forcing the consumer to personally contact each agency to correct errors or update information.

Trying to deal with a CRA can invoke images of "Brazil" or "1984." Imagine the most impersonal, faceless bureaucracy ever -- impossible to contact, and requiring you to navigate through a labyrinth of scams, false promises, and outright lies.

You can call a CRA via their toll-free number, but they are only open between 9 am and 5 pm in your time zone, thus requiring you to either call them while you're at work, on your lunch break, or force you to take time off to deal with them. You can write them at their public address, but responses can take up to 30 days, not an option if you have an urgent collection notice on your desk.

Most of us would probably contact them via their Web site, but wait! You may end up getting redirected to a "nested" subsidiary site like True Credit or Credit Expert -- they look and sound like the right site, but you may get conned into ordering your credit report for astoundingly expensive fees, and then be unable to dispute any records or get any assistance.

Of the three, Equifax is the only one to offer a direct connection to its site, but in order to get instant customer assistance, I had to suck it up and buy one of their credit reports. Once I did, I magically got access to their member site, including a toll-free 24-7 customer service hotline.

That was the easy part, however. You have to keep a cool head and know all your facts when dealing with CRA customer service representatives. They are generally reading from a script and told what they can and cannot answer, and often try to steer you to buy other CRA-sold products in order to answer your questions. When you flat-out ask for information, more often than not, they'll be unable to tell you. The best thing to do is get your credit report and go over it with a magnifying glass, picking out any discrepancies yourself.

Don't want to deal with one of these vast bureaucracies? You do have options. Many consumer sites and credit-related sites offer "free" credit reports. The most well-known, FreeCreditReport.com, is another subsidiary of Experian, but it actually provides fairly up-to-date credit data, at least from its parent agency.

The federal government has recently provided some new options, thanks to the amended Fair Credit Reporting Act of 2004. One important provision is the right of consumers to access a complete credit report for free once a year. However, this new system is being rolled out region-by-region, so if you live on the East Coast, you will not be able to use it until September 1st, 2005.

Bankrate.com provides a complete state-by-state rundown of where you can get a credit report and what it may cost you. Consumers' Union recommends picking up one report from an agency every three months in order to get the most accurate picture of your credit without paying extraordinary fees.

The consumer needs to know everything they can about credit reporting agencies. CRA's are the national agencies that monitor every consumer's credit purcha...

Article Image

FICO At A Glance

What Is This FICO Thing Anyway?

The easiest way to think about the FICO is that it's a combined score, pulling together varied facts from a credit report, which projects how safe a bet you are as a borrower. While your employment history and income are factored in, the FICO score is central to the loan decisions made by virtually all consumer lenders.

The FICO formula is mind-bogglingly complex, the kind of math that turns PhDs grey. This formula takes scores of credit report data points into account, throws them into a statistical Cuisinart, and spits out a three digit figure between 400 and 850.

The score that results is supposed to offer a good guess as to how likely you are to default on the loan within the first two years. If you have a combined FICO score between 550 and 599, for example, you allegedly have a 52 percent chance of defaulting. (see below)

From a consumer standpoint, the FICO score is actually friendlier than a credit report. While credit report information more or less sits there for seven to 10 years, FICO scores can change comparatively quickly. "The further away you are from [an adverse event], the less impact it has on your score," says FairIsaac spokesman Ryan Sjoblad.

FICO At A Glance...

Credit Reporting Questions

About Credit Bureaus

If you've ever bought a car, owned a home or just used a credit card to finance a purchase, then you have a record with a consumer reporting agency.

Credit bureaus are companies which gather and sell consumers' credit histories to credit-grantors, such as banks, retailers or credit-card companies. Nationwide, there are three major credit bureaus: Equifax, Experian and Trans Union. In addition, credit bureaus sell credit information with other consumer reporting agencies, which, in turn, resell such information to the creditors and other end-users.

While the consumer reporting agencies themselves do not determine if you will get approval for a loan or a credit card, the information they provide to credit grantors does play a valuable role. Credit-granting businesses pay a fee to consumer reporting agencies in order to gain access to their information. Only companies with a legitimate need, such as a mortgage company, car dealership, bank or department store, may purchase consumer credit information. In addition, prospective employers, landlords or insurance underwriters also may request information from your credit file.

Upon request by a legitimate business, the credit reporting agency will furnish the following information about you:

  • General information, such as name, Social Security Number, marital status and address (both past and present);
  • Employer name and address;
  • Debtors and payment history;
  • Inquirers of your credit file; and,
  • Public record information, such as bankruptcies or liens

Credit reporting agencies do not gather or disseminate information regarding your race, religious preference, medical history or criminal record, if any.

Credit & Divorce

Going through a divorce brings about all kinds of changes. For many, it's painful. For others, it's about new beginnings. Whatever your special circumstances, it's important to know and understand how a divorce affects your credit file.

Whether you're starting out on your own and need to establish credit, moving to or buying a new home, or are now the primary bill payer, it's critical for you to be familiar with the information on your credit report. This is an important time for you to check your three bureau report from Confidential Credit to see all the information and to acquaint yourself with everything-;good or bad-;that might be in your file.

First and foremost, you should know that a divorce decree does not absolve you from your bills. You are still obligated to repay the joint debts you and your ex-spouse incurred while married. In fact, a divorce decree has no impact whatsoever on outstanding debts that you still have. This applies even if a divorce judge directs your ex-spouse to pay a bill and then he or she is unable to fulfill this obligation. It is then your responsibility to pay the debt you two entered into jointly.

In addition, should your ex-spouse be delinquent in paying a joint bill, the creditor has every right to report that negative information about you to a credit bureau. If your ex-spouse doesn't pay at all, the creditor can ask you to repay the debt and can even take legal action against you for unsettled accounts.

If you divorce, you should consider closing joint accounts you and your ex-spouse had and begin to develop credit independently.

Before the divorce is finalized, both you and your spouse should look at all your debts. Decide who will be responsible for paying off which ones. Try to come to as equitable a solution as possible. Remember, both of your credit files will be affected by any negative information that is reported, now and in the future.

If you need further assistance, seek the advice of a credit counseling organization such as Consumer Credit Counselors at the National Foundation for Consumer Credit (NFCC). Call their toll-free number at: 1-800-388-2227 to find the location closest to where you live. More extreme measures may call for the help of a divorce mediator or attorney. The Academy of Family Mediators, American Bar Association or Legal Aid office in your area can provide information or referrals.

Your Credit Rights

Your consumer rights regarding your credit file are ensured by several federal laws. In addition, state law which also apply. The Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) was designed specifically to help ensure that credit bureaus furnish businesses with correct and complete information to use when evaluating your application or your creditworthiness.

The FCRA protects consumers by requiring credit bureaus to adopt reasonable procedures regarding confidentiality, accuracy and proper use of your credit information. In summary, the FCRA states:

  • You have the right to know the name of anyone who received your credit report in the last year for most purposes and in the last two years for employment purposes;
  • At your request, a credit reporting agency must provide you with your credit file. You are entitled to one free report per year if a) you are unemployed and plan to seek employment in 60 days, b) you are on welfare or c) your report is inaccurate due to fraud. If you have been denied credit, you also may request a free copy of your credit report, as long as the credit file is requested within 60 days of denial notification;
  • Inaccurate information must be corrected or deleted by the credit reporting agency, usually within 30 days after you successfully dispute the information;
  • A credit reporting agency may not report negative information, in most cases, that is more than seven years old, or in the case of bankruptcies, 10 years old;
  • Your consent is required for reports that are provided to employers, or for reports that contain medical information; and,
  • Access to your file is limited only to those with a need recognized by the FCRA-;usually to consider an application with a creditor, insurer, employer, landlord or other business.

For the complete text of the FCRA, 15 U.S.C. 1681-1681u and your rights thereunder, go to the Federal Trade Commission's web site http://www.ftc.gov.

What Lenders Look For in a Credit Report

In many cases a lender extending you credit may never actually meet you. And, most of the time, they won't have an opportunity to learn what type of a person you are or to discover for themselves if you are a trustworthy, capable individual. Often, all they have to make a judgment about your ability to pay is by looking at your credit history-; which is an accounting of your ability to repay debt.

When determining if they should extend credit to you or not, lenders may order one of two different types of credit reports in order to examine your credit history:

  • Quick Credit Check-This is a basic credit report, showing information from one, two or all three national bureaus. The basic report provides information on your debtors, past and present, and on what type of payment history you have.
  • Residential Mortgage Credit Report (RMCR) - A lender will require this report if you are buying a home, and as such applying for a large loan amount. The lender will pull reports from at least two, and usually all three, bureaus. In addition, your current employment may be verified and public records searched for bankruptcies or liens.

Lenders are primarily looking for three things when they pull your credit file. The first is your character. Lenders want to know if you are someone who acts responsibly, takes their debts seriously and pays their bills on time.

Secondly, a lender will look at your capacity to pay your bills on time. This is based upon your income, or the joint income of you and your spouse, and how that corresponds to your total debt.

Finally, a lender will take a look at the possessions you currently have, or your collateral. You might have a car, valued at $10,000, that is already paid off. Your ability to payoff this loan demonstrates that you had the character to eliminate this debt and provides the lender with a possession which can be used as security against repaying the new loan.

All three factors, your character, your ability to pay and possessions or collateral, help provide lenders with needed information which is then used to determine whether or not they think you are creditworthy.

Tips for Improving Your Credit File and Score

Perhaps the most valuable suggestion for improving your credit file, and consequently your credit risk score, is to act responsibly. Know your financial limitations. Understand how your monthly income relates to your monthly bills and debts. Don't spend out of your bounds.

Once it's in your record, the only true way to eliminate negative credit information from your file is the passage of time. Information in your credit history will only be changed if it is inaccurate or if the seven (or 10) year reporting period has elapsed. In some cases, adverse information may be reported without reference to these periods.

If you have a history of bad credit, there are a number of things you can do to start rebuilding a positive credit file:

  • First, know what's on your credit report. If you have been denied credit, you have the right to request a free credit report. Or, for a reasonable fee you can conveniently order your consolidated report from Confidential Credit, which includes information from all three national bureaus. Take the time to understand not only what's on your report, but why you have been denied credit.
  • Check for mistakes on your credit report. Be sure to examine your files from all three bureaus, as the information may not be the same on each one. If you find errors, take steps to dispute the information in order to remove it from your file.
  • If you are having difficulty paying your bills, develop a plan now. Make a list of everyone you owe and how much you owe. Contact your creditors and discuss payment options. Begin now to catch up with late payments. These efforts will show you are earnest in meeting your obligations.
  • Look for ways you can consolidate bills. You might be able to do a balance transfer to another credit card with a lower interest rate and also eliminate three or four other credit card accounts you currently have.
  • Identify ways you can decrease your spending and increase your income. Ask a friend or family member to help you come up with a realistic budget that will help you catch up with late payments.
  • Finally, don't use credit again until you are on more solid footing. You may want to cancel-;or just hide-;your credit cards until you are in a financial position to use them responsibly again.

If you are just starting out on your own, perhaps after a divorce or just out of college, you'll want to begin establishing a positive credit file. This will play an important role in determining your future creditworthiness and in ensuring that you have a good credit score when it comes to evaluating your file for a mortgage or other type of loan. If you have little or no prior credit history, consider these tips:

Limit the number of accounts you have. Resist the temptation to sign up for every credit card you can. Find a revolving credit card that has a reasonable credit limit ($300 maximum) and stay within your budget. Pay your bills on time. Every month, your creditors release information to the credit bureaus. Make sure your creditors are reporting only positive information about your bill-paying history. Ask a family member to help you get credit. If you have little or no credit history, you may need the assistance of someone with an established and positive credit record to co-sign a loan for you. However, if you do this, be sure you are responsible in making all your loan payments on time.

Remember, your credit history influences your ability to rent or buy a house, get a job, buy insurance and purchase items with a credit card. Many lenders and creditors consider it a direct reflection of your character. Start now to ensure that you have-;and maintain-;a good credit history.

About Credit Repair Companies

If you have negative information in your credit file, you may want to think twice before calling a credit repair company to help you. For a fee, many credit repair companies will claim they can "fix or clean up" your credit record. Some will even promote that they can eliminate bankruptcies or liens from your file forever. In truth, these companies may end up costing you money-;sometimes putting you in even worse financial shape than before.

Generally, you can do everything a credit repair company claims to be able to do, for little or no money. All that's required of you is a little bit of time, a concentrated effort, and an action plan to repay debt and get back on the road to a healthy financial future.

Under the Credit Repair Organizations Act, credit repair companies must give you a copy of the "Consumer Credit File Rights Under State and Federal Law" before you sign a contract. In addition, they have to supply you with a written contract which clearly defines your rights and obligations. Under law, a credit repair organization cannot do any of the following:

  • Make false claims about their services;
  • Charge you until they have completed the promised services; or
  • Perform any services until they have your signature on a written contract and have completed a three-day waiting period. During this time, you have the right to cancel the contract without paying any fees.

If you are considering enlisting the help of a credit repair organization, call the Better Business Bureau in your area to learn more about the company. Even better, contact a nonprofit credit counseling service. You'll find them listed in your local telephone book or you could check with your bank or a consumer protection office to see if they have some suggestions.

Credit Fraud

You've always had a spotless credit history. You pay your bills on time. And you live well within your financial means. But, recently you've received a few calls from collection agencies requesting payment for items you didn't buy. Before you dismiss these actions as a mistake, investigate.

You could be the victim of credit fraud.Each year individuals with good credit histories fall prey to criminals who steal their identity and run up thousands of dollars in bad debt under their names. If it happens to you, through no fault of your own, you could be faced with years of trying to clear your credit history of false information.

If you suspect someone has used your name, Social Security Number or driver's license to obtain credit, do the following:

  • Call the fraud units of the three credit bureaus: Equifax 1-800-685-1111, Experian 1-800-301-7195 and Trans Union 1-281-874-0169.
  • Report identity theft crimes to the local police or law enforcement agency in your area.
  • Put a "fraud alert" on your credit file. Also, report the possible theft to all credit card issuers. Cancel all your current cards.
  • Notify your bank and/or savings and loan of the theft. Request new account numbers and a new ATM number and password.
  • Consider changing your driver's license number if you suspect someone has been using it to write bad checks.

To prevent identity fraud from happening, here are some steps you can take:

  • Don't carry extra credit cards, your birth certificate, passport or Social Security number with you unless necessary. This will minimize the amount of information a thief can steal from you.
  • Don't print your Social Security Number on your checks. Only give it out if absolutely necessary.
  • Shield the ATM screen when using it in a public place.
  • Tear up pre-approved credit card offers that arrive in the mail.
  • Never leave a receipt with your credit card number on it in a public place. Take it home with you to a safe place or tear it up.
  • Keep current with the information that is on your credit file. Don't learn about negative information when you go to apply for a loan. Be proactive about your credit historyprotect it!by checking your files with Confidential Credit.

If you know you are a victim of credit fraud the following organizations may be of help:

  • National Fraud Information Center: 1-800-876-7060
  • Consumer Credit Counseling Services: 1-800-873-2227
  • CSC Credit Services: 1-800-272-9281

Also check the Yellow Pages listings for your local offices of:

  • The Better Business Bureau
  • The Regional Consumer Protection Office of the Attorney General.

Credit bureaus are companies which gather and sell consumers' credit histories to credit-grantors, such as banks, retailers or credit-card companies....