Photo
Source: University of Melbourne

Many consumers willingly pay for the services of people who claim to be psychics, who supposedly use extrasensory perception to learn things that can't be detected through sight, sound, smell or touch. Some of us even think we have this ability ourselves.

But researchers at the University of Melbourne say it's just not so. And furthermore, they say they an prove it that what sometimes seems like ESP isn't.

Their study, published today in the journal PLOS ONE, found that people could reliably sense when a change had occurred, even when they could not see exactly what had changed.

For example, a person might notice a general change in someone’s appearance but not be able to identify that the person had had a haircut.

Lead researcher Dr. Piers Howe, from the Melbourne School of Psychological Sciences, said the research is the first to show in a scientific study that people can reliably sense changes that they cannot visually identify.

Common belief

“There is a common belief that observers can experience changes directly with their mind, without needing to rely on the traditional physical senses such as vision, hearing, taste, smell and touch to identify it. This alleged ability is sometimes referred to as a sixth sense or ESP.

“We were able to show that while observers could reliably sense changes that they could not visually identify, this ability was not due to extrasensory perception or a sixth sense,” he said.

In the study, observers were presented with pairs of color photographs, both of the same female. In some cases, her appearance would be different in the two photographs. For example, the individual might have a different hairstyle.

Each photograph was presented for 1.5 seconds with a 1-second break between them. After the last photograph, the observer was asked whether a change had occurred and, if so, to identify the change from a list of nine possible changes. 


The results showed that study participants could generally detect when a change had occurred even when they could not identify exactly what had changed. For example, they might notice that the two photographs had different amounts of red or green but not be able to use this information to determine that the person had changed the color of their hat.

This resulted in the observer “feeling” or “sensing” that a change had occurred without being able to visually identify the change. Thus, the result that observers can reliably feel or sense when a change has occurred without being able to visually identify the change could be explained without invoking an extrasensory mechanism.

The research was led by Senior Lecturer Dr. Piers Howe in collaboration with researcher Margaret Webb at the Melbourne School of Psychological Sciences, University of Melbourne.


Share your Comments