Airlines and Airports

The 'Air Travel Updates and Tips' living topic provides comprehensive coverage of the latest developments and essential information in the airline and airport sectors. This includes recent incidents, policy changes, and operational adjustments by major airlines such as Delta, United, and Southwest. The content also covers the evolving regulations from the FAA and DOT, such as new rules on family seating and refunds for delays and cancellations. Additionally, the page offers practical advice for travelers on navigating common issues like baggage policies, flight cancellations, and using travel insurance. It aims to keep travelers informed and prepared for their journeys, ensuring a smoother and more informed travel experience.

Article Timeline

Newest
  • Newest
  • Oldest
Article Image

United makes efforts to make travel easier for wheelchair users

Able-bodied travelers probably never give it a second thought, but airline passengers who are dependent on wheelchairs count into the millions.

And while mishandled wheelchairs don't quite match up with the number of mishandled baggage, it is a big enough problem that United Airlines has decided that it – maybe alone – can make the situation better.

The airline has just released a new digital sizing tool designed to help its passengers determine the right aircraft for their wheelchair. To show it’s serious about this, United will refund the fare difference if someone has to pay more for an alternative flight with a larger cargo door.

Last year, United and United Express, together carried more than 200,000 checked wheelchairs, but the number of wheelchairs and scooters mishandled per 100 enplaned was 1.09. Comparatively, that metric might not create the headlines that United’s other recent problems (hydraulics, losing a wheel, etc.), but it is about 30% higher than Delta which has the best record in that category.

"The more we know about a customer's device, the more likely their experience will be a good one – from booking and check-in to the flight itself," said Linda Jojo, executive vice president and chief customer Officer for United. "These new tools and policies also set our employees up for success, especially those working on the ramp or at the gate."

How It Works

Anyone flying United who needs to bring a personal wheelchair on their flight can visit the United app or united.com and use the filters on the flight search results page before selecting their flight. 

Step two comes after clicking on the wheelchair filter tab near the upper portion of the screen, when customers enter the specific dimensions of their mobility device. At that point, the search results enter the picture to identify which flight options will accommodate those dimensions and let the customer know whether their wheelchair fits or not. 

But in situations where the size of aircraft cargo hold doors can’t handle a larger motorized wheelchair and the customer has to take a United flight with a higher fare that can accommodate their wheelchair on the same day and between the same origin and destination, the customer may seek a refund of the fare difference.

United to offer loaners when it damages a wheelchair, too

United is adding another plus for wheelchair/scooter users. For anyone who’s flying through George Bush Houston Intercontinental Airport and finds that their wheelchair was damaged or delayed while traveling, the airline will provide an appropriate loaner wheelchair. 

The airline understands that wheelchairs tend to be tailor-fit for a person’s size, weight, frame, etc. and is currently testing specialized, adjustable Permobil cushions for loaner wheelchairs at its Houston hub that should improve comfort and stability.

The company said that is also reimbursing customers for transportation expenses should they choose to wait at a location other than the airport.

Able-bodied travelers probably never give it a second thought, but airline passengers who are dependent on wheelchairs count into the millions.And whil...

Article Image

Airbnb takes another step in improving its cancellation policy

Hurricanes are in but COVID-19 outbreaks are out in Airbnb's new cancellation policy. As part of the company’s ongoing efforts to improve things with travelers, it is introducing updates to its Extenuating Circumstances Policy – including renaming it to the Major Disruptive Events Policy – to better reflect its purpose.

That section will be overhauled to provide cancellation and refund support when major events like natural disasters, government travel restrictions, or weather events impact guests' ability to stay at a location.

Going forward, that shift accomplishes two things. First, it supersedes a host’s booking cancellation policy, thus enabling guests to cancel eligible upcoming and active reservations at the impacted location for a refund; and second, it also allows hosts to cancel reservations without fees and other related consequences.

Breaking that down to real-world situations, the policy will formally apply to foreseeable weather events – like a hurricane during hurricane season – that result in another covered event happening.

For example, if you were going to Florida during hurricane season, and the local government closed the roads or the power was out, you can cancel and receive a refund. Likewise, hosts can cancel without fees and related consequences -- both as long as the bookings are "eligible” reservations.

“The changes to this policy, including its new name, were made to create clarity for our guests and Hosts and ensure it’s meeting the diverse needs of our global community,” Juniper Downs, Airbnb’s head of Community Policy, said.

“Our aim was to clearly explain when the policy applies to a reservation, and to deliver fair and consistent outcomes for our users. These updates also bring the policy in line with industry standards.”

These policy updates come into effect for all reservations taking place on or after June 6, 2024.

Caveats, eligibility, and travel insurance

Airbnb suggested that there’s likely to be a little shakeout while it, guests, and hosts all get to the point where everyone knows what’s supposed to happen in these situations. 

As examples, it gave these three examples:

  • Limiting coverage to large-scale events at the destination location only to help balance the needs of our entire community. This means that the policy will only apply to reservations where a major disruptive event has impacted the location of the listing. 

  • Making clear that mid-trip cancellations can be made due to a covered event, with guests receiving a refund for any nights they didn’t stay and without fees and related consequences for hosts.

  • Reminding hosts that they’re obligated to cancel reservations if their listing is uninhabitable or no longer consistent with what was originally booked by their guest and that they are able to do this without cancellation fees and related consequences.

But, the bottom line appears to be that it’s still the guest’s responsibility to make sure how it impacts them. One of those caveats is the word "eligible" as it applies to a booking. 

ConsumerAffairs asked Airbnb for an explanation of what "eligible" meant and here is their response:

"Reservations outside of the defined area and timeframe may not be eligible, though Hosts may still be able to cancel without adverse consequences if they are unable to host. We continuously monitor these situations and adjust coverage as needed to reflect changing conditions. If you believe this Policy applies to your reservation, please contact us to inquire about eligibility."

The bottom line here is that if you’re going to a destination where there may be some sort of disruption, you should first contact Airbnb to ask what’s covered.

Airbnb goes has far as saying that the second thing is that you might want to consider is travel insurance. “As this cancellation and refund policy is not designed to apply to all types of unexpected issues and emergencies that can impact a trip, guests should consider purchasing travel insurance,” the company said.

Hurricanes are in but COVID-19 outbreaks are out in Airbnb's new cancellation policy. As part of the company’s ongoing efforts to improve things with trave...

Article Image

Airbnb bans indoor security cameras at its properties

Gone are the days of Airbnb hosters having indoor security cameras in their rental properties. 

The company has announced that moving forward, all indoor security cameras will be banned from rental properties around the globe. 

Before this announcement, hosts were allowed to have security cameras in common spaces, like hallways or living rooms. The main caveat was that cameras weren’t allowed in private areas, like bedrooms or bathrooms, and rental descriptions had to explicitly state the presence of cameras. 

However, that is no longer the case. Starting April 30, indoor cameras will no longer be allowed in Airbnb’s rental properties for any purpose and regardless of any prior warnings. 

“Our goal was to create new, clear rules that provide our community with greater clarity about what to expect on Airbnb,” said Juniper Downs, head of community policy and partnerships at Airbnb. “These changes were made in consultation with our guests, hosts, and privacy experts, and we’ll continue to seek feedback to help ensure our policies work for our global community.” 

New rules on outdoor cameras, too

In addition to the indoor camera ban, Airbnb is also making adjustments to its rules on outdoor security cameras. 

While these are still allowed, hosts will be required to disclose the use and location of any outdoor cameras before guests book their stay. The cameras must also be strictly focused on the outdoor area of the property, without catching any indoor footage. 

Additionally, Airbnb is putting limitations on where hosts can have outdoor cameras. Any outdoor areas like saunas or showers must be free of security cameras. 

As part of these new regulations, hosts will also be required to inform renters if they’re utilizing any noise decibel monitors. These units must only be placed in common areas, and they must only be used as a means of measuring sound – not recording or transmitting conversations. 

Airbnb plans to enact these changes starting on April 30, giving hosts time to get into compliance with the new rules. The company stated that the majority of Airbnb listings don’t have security cameras, and these new regulations aren’t likely to greatly impact renters or hosts. 

Gone are the days of Airbnb hosters having indoor security cameras in their rental properties. The company has announced that moving forward, all indoo...

Article Image

Tips to navigating airline travel in 2024

Airline travel can be stressful, and knowing how to navigate last-minute changes, delays, and disruptions to your itinerary can be even more stressful. 

As part of this year’s Consumer Protection Week, the U.S. PIRG Education Fund shared its best insights for consumers to utilize when they're flying. This includes everything from knowing your rights when flights are canceled or delayed, when bags go missing or when you’re suddenly bumped from a flight. 

“Airline travel has often been unreliable for years as the airlines struggled with post-pandemic staffing and logistics,” wrote Teresa Murray, consumer watchdog from the U.S. PIRG Education Fund. “Almost every airline has had at least one disastrous weekend with mass cancellations during the last couple of years. We could be past the worst, but it’s still best to plan for possible problems.” 

What are your rights as a traveler?

The U.S. PIRG Education Fund has created a Flyer’s Bill of Rights that details everything consumers need to know when flying, including information about canceled or delayed flights, rebooking, tarmac delays, getting bumped from flights, flight delays, delayed bags, lost or damaged bags, and filing complaints. 

Airlines are required to give travelers a full refund, including ticket prices, taxes, baggage fees, extra charges, and ancillary fees if the carrier cancels the flight. Many airlines will cover the cost of a transfer ticket to another airline if your original ticket has been canceled; however, this isn’t required by law. 

If your flight is significantly delayed or canceled because of staffing or equipment issues, or any other reason within the airline’s control, you have options. The U.S. PIRG Education Fund found that: 

  • Six of the 10 major airlines will rebook you on another airline for no extra charge. 

  • All 10 major airlines will provide a meal voucher. 

  • Nine of the 10 major airlines will pay for hotels and ground transportation if you’re stuck somewhere overnight. However, you may have to ask them to do so. 

What about bags? 

Sometimes, you end up at your destination but your checked bag doesn’t. What is the protocol for travelers? 

  • Most airlines will reimburse flyers for necessities, like a change of clothes or toiletries, if bags are delayed. 

  • When bags are completely lost, travelers should receive reimbursement for any baggage fees as well as up to $3,800 for the items inside. 

As a consumer, you’re also entitled to file a complaint with either the airline or the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). Any complaints filed with airlines must be acknowledged within 30 days, and responses must be sent in writing within 60 days. 

Tips before you book a flight

Before you book your next trip, there are many things you can do to help reduce your stress levels when you get to the airport. Some tips from the U.S. PIRG Education Fund include: 

  • Be careful about booking through third-party ticket websites. While they may offer a discount, when it comes time for a refund or rebooking, it’s often more difficult through these sites, as opposed to navigating the specific airline’s website. 

  • Flying early in the morning reduces your chances of delays or other mishaps. 

  • Limit how often you book connecting flights, as this can also reduce the likelihood of delays, cancellations, or other frustrations. 

  • There are resources online to look at a flight’s statistics in terms of on-time arrivals and departures. This can help you know if you’re more likely to get stuck in a long delay. 

  • Avoid a checked bag when possible. However, if you do need to check a bag, put a tracker in it so you know where your bag is at all times. It’s also recommended to take pictures of everything that’s inside your checked bag in the event the bag gets lost and you need to file a claim. 

Airline travel can be stressful, and knowing how to navigate last-minute changes, delays, and disruptions to your itinerary can be even more stressful....

Article Image

Has Airbnb put its worst days behind it?

Over the last 10 years, we’ve seen Airbnb become America’s destination darling, only to go off the rails when hosts – who should’ve never been hosts to begin with – got greedy with fees and forgot what good customer service is all about.

But, a new study claims that while the company still encounters some unhappy campers, it may have turned the corner in eliminating gripes and frustrations and getting back on its balance beam again.

Getting the right stuff in the right place

The new study, commissioned by Photoaid, found that there are still some things that irk Airbnb guests. The top three are issues with refunds or cancellations (74%), noisy surroundings (73%), and misleading photos/descriptions (72%).

The refunds/cancellations issues are a sore point with many ConsumerAffairs reviewers like Denny from Seattle who claims he spent days trying to get an answer from at least half a dozen people about their cancellation policy. Angela from Sunnyvale Calif., suggests that the company may be playing games with its cancellation policy, too.

“They only grant a full service fee refund if you cancel within the free cancellation period. Otherwise, you're left with zilch. When the host chooses a percentage refund, one would assume that the service fee would align with that percentage refund,” she wrote in a ConsumerAffairs review.

However, most Americans had a positive experience with Airbnb. All told, 80% rated their experience as satisfactory (45%) or very satisfactory (34%). Nearly 83% reported choosing Airbnb over hotels at least some of the time in the past 24 months. And a significant 92% of respondents are likely (54%) or very likely (38%) to use Airbnb in the future.

Failing forward fast

Airbnb didn’t share its priority list with ConsumerAffairs, but it did note that out of the 430+ upgrades it made in the last several years, many of those were designed to specifically improve quality and reliability. 

For example, it updated price tools to make pricing more transparent and has tried to verify every listing in the U.S., Canada, Australia, UK, and France to weed out hosts who aren’t holding up their part of the customer service bargain.

Airbnb CEO and Co-Founder Brian Chesky even reached out to users on X to get a handle on what people think about the product and what they would change.

Getting the right person on the phone looks to be the company’s next challenge. Airbnb’s current goals in this regard are to answer calls in 10 different languages within two minutes and clean up its customer service act so that when guests call, they’ll get matched with the best agents to resolve their specific issues, faster.

The cancellation issue? Don’t hold your breath. When ConsumerAffairs asked Airbnb about the complaints our readers are writing, a fix for that wasn’t addressed.

So, until that happens, following Airbnb’s cancellation instructions to a “T” and keeping a record of everything you did – calmly and politely – is in your best interest. 

Over the last 10 years, we’ve seen Airbnb become America’s destination darling, only to go off the rails when hosts – who should’ve never been hosts to beg...

Article Image

Is $40 the new standard for airline baggage fees?

American Airlines (AA) is upping the price for checked baggage. Joining Alaska and JetBlue – and leaving Southwest Airlines as the only major airline offering free checked bags – AA’s fee is based on when and where you pay for your bags.

If you do it when you purchase the ticket at AA.com, it’ll be $35. If you wait until you get to the airport, it’s $40. And if you want to check a second bag, you’ll be shelling out another $45. 

Those all apply to domestic flights. The new bag fees for Canada and short-haul international flights are $35 for first checked bags and $45 for second checked bags purchased online or at the airport.

Does this qualify as greed or need?

Before you go claiming that this is nothing but greed that falls in line with $5 for a bag of chips, $29.95 for two inches more legroom, and $15 to board before someone else, one airline revenue expert says it’s anything but.

“I think American's increase is more nuanced than a simple grab for more revenue. Their chief commercial officer mentioned the company's desire to move low-fare consumers along this path: buy basic economy, then spend more on a la carte extras to add comfort, then enroll in AAdvantage, and finally to apply for a co-branded credit card,” Jay Sorenson, the president of IdeaWorksCompany, an analyzer of ancillary revenue that airlines use to pump up their bank accounts.

Sorenson says that a higher bag fee encourages consumers to buy Main Cabin or above and to truly consider the checked bag benefit of the credit card.

“The airline must also believe it has the "carry-on problem," an industry-wide issue, under control because these increases discourage checked bags,” he told ConsumerAffairs.

It’s not AA’s only change, though

Starting in May, AA wants its customers to come to it first – not Expedia or Kayak or any other online travel agency. And it says that if you do, they’ll make it worth your while as in earning miles and Loyalty Points on flights when you:

  1. Book directly with American and eligible partner airlines

  2. Book travel anywhere as an AAdvantage Business member or contracted corporate traveler

  3. Book through preferred travel agencies. American will share a list of eligible preferred agencies on aa.com in late April

  4. Basic Economy fare tickets will only earn when booked directly with American and eligible partner airlines

Where do all the airlines stack up on baggage fees now?

Here’s a quick breakdown of how the landscape is changing on baggage fees: 

Airline

First checked bag

Second checked bag

Notes

Alaska Airlines

$35

$45

Fees apply as of Jan 2nd, 2024.

Delta

$30

$40

Standard fees for domestic flights.

Frontier Airlines

$59 (booking)

$74 (before check-in)

$99 (airport)

JetBlue

$35

$50

Cheaper to add bags before check-in or with Mosaic frequent flyer membership.

Spirit Airlines

$44 (booking)

$49 (carry-on)

When you book your bag at the same time as you book your flight, you can save up to $20 per bag compared to waiting until later (like at the airport).
On Tuesdays and Wednesdays. Spirit Airlines sometimes offers discounts on bags on these days, so it's worth checking their website or app to see if there are any current deals.

Southwest

Free (2 bags)

$125

Free checked bags are a major perk, additional bags and overweight fees apply.

United Airlines

$35

$45

Those fees are standard for most domestic flights.

American Airlines (AA) is upping the price for checked baggage. Joining Alaska and JetBlue – and leaving Southwest Airlines as the only major airline offer...

Article Image

How everyone aboard an airliner survived that fiery crash in Tokyo

By now, most people have seen the horrifying footage of a Japan Airlines jet completely engulfed in flames after colliding with another plane at Haneda Airport in Tokyo.

But amazingly, all 367 passengers and 12 crew members were evacuated safely in a series of events being compared to the “miracle on the Hudson.” In 2009, US Airways Flight 1549, piloted by Chesley "Sully" Sullenberger and Jeffrey Skiles, ditched in the Hudson River with no fatalities after striking a flock of geese on take-off from New York’s LaGuardia airport.

Five of the six people aboard the Japan Coast Guard plane that struck the Japan Airways airliner died as their plane exploded.

In the case of the Japan Airways fire, the airline said the flight crew used megaphones and their voices to instruct passengers because the aircraft’s public address system was disabled.

How were they able to get everyone to safety with no loss of life? It turns out the crash looked a lot worse outside – with flames completely engulfing the aircraft – than it did in the cabin. Cell phone footage shot by a passenger and aired by Australia’s Sky News reveals what happened.

This is what it looked like from outside the plane:

The training and skill of the flight crew no doubt played a role in this “miracle.” An airline spokesperson said the passengers – including eight infants – were evacuated through three emergency chutes. 

The airline said there were no serious injuries but 14 passengers requested medical attention.

By now, most people have seen the horrifying footage of a Japan Airlines jet completely engulfed in flames after colliding with another plane at Haneda Air...

Article Image

Flying Thanksgiving? TSA says prepare three days in advance

As if carry-ons and airlines weren’t enough of a hot mess, the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) says it anticipates that security checkpoints across the U.S. will be busier than ever this Thanksgiving travel season.

And the rush will happen earlier than you might think, too. The agency says that the travel season actually kicks off this Friday, Nov. 17 and runs for nearly two weeks, through Tuesday, Nov. 28. During that period, TSA expects to screen 30 million passengers.

The spike in TSA screenings is forecast to happen on the Tuesday and Wednesday prior to Thanksgiving and the Sunday afterward which is expected to be the busiest day overall.

The need for speed

TSA Administrator David Pekoske said his agency is equipped for the rush and is shooting for wait time standards of under 10 minutes for TSA PreCheck® lanes and under 30 minutes for standard screening lanes. 

That goal is well and good, but anyone who has TSA PreCheck and who’s flown lately has no doubt noticed that the PreCheck lines are getting longer and longer. Pekoske said there are now more than 17.6 million passengers enrolled in TSA PreCheck, which is 3.9 million more members than there were this time last year.

Travel efficiency requires more than just the TSA, though. When it comes to the airports with the most delays, a new travel study suggests that there are 10 airports where travelers should plan on getting to early.

Fort Lauderdale-Hollywood International (FLL) tops the list of the “most delays” followed by McCarran International (Las Vegas) (LAS), Orlando International (MCO), Baltimore/Washington (BAL), Chicago Midway (MDW).

In the “busiest” category, it’s Atlanta (ATL), Dallas-Ft. Worth (DFW), and Denver (DEN), Chicago O’Hare (ORD), and Los Angeles International (LAX).

Ensuring success at the airport

Travelers also have to take into consideration that how they approach their trip is also a factor. Anyone traveling over the holidays should keep in mind several things before arriving at the airport.

What goes in carry-ons and what doesn’t. If you plan on taking Aunt Edna’s cranberry sauce, gravy, wine, jam or jelly, those foods must be packed in a checked bag because they’re considered liquids or gels. If you try to get them through TSA, it’s a safe bet that they’ll wind up in the trash bin, so remember this: If you can spill it, spray it, spread it, pump it or pour it, then it is a liquid and must be packed in your checked bag. Conversely, if it’s a solid food, like a pecan pie, then you can take it through the TSA checkpoint. Check for prohibited items by using the “What Can I Bring?” page on TSA.gov. or just ask @AskTSA.

More technology is being used, but that doesn’t always ensure perfection. TSA is employing more tech than ever, beginning with its Credential Authentication Technology (CAT) units, where a boarding pass is not needed. However, as ConsumerAffairs witnessed recently, technology at airports can malfunction and further delay the process. That’s one more reason to get to the airport at least two hours early.

Get the airline’s app. The airlines’ mobile apps are getting more and more efficient and are the best way to monitor boarding times, seat assignments, changes, and even have a barcode of your ticket that can make getting through the airport screening easier. And if you're flight is delayed or canceled, the app usually gets that information to you faster.

If you’re flying Southwest, you now get an in-app benefit about your bags, too. Now on Southwest.com and the Southwest mobile app, travelers can view the status of their checked bag across three different milestones of each checked piece of luggage: when bag tags are printed, when bags are loaded, and when unloaded from the aircraft.

Southwest also recently launched a new capability for travelers to add checked bags digitally at the time of their check-in, up to 24 hours before arriving at the airport. It's another timesaver that eliminates the steps to print bag tags at kiosks.

One important thing to remember about an airline’s app and TSA PreCheck is this: Just because you’re enrolled in PreCheck doesn’t guarantee your membership has been automatically connected with your ticket.

If you have PreCheck and get in the PreCheck line thinking all is good, it may not be. Three days (72 hours) before you leave, double-check that your ticket actually lists you as a PreCheck member beforehand. If it doesn’t, then, you need to take these steps:

  • First, check that your membership has not expired by looking up your account here.  

  • If still active, confirm with your airline that your Known Traveler Number, name, and date of birth are accurate and that your airline participates in TSA PreCheck.  If you still do not have a TSA PreCheck indicator on your boarding pass, please call the TSA Contact Center at (866) 289-9673, submit an online form, or contact us at @AskTSA on Twitter and Facebook Messenger.  

Call ahead to request passenger support. If you’re part of a group that will require assistance, such as a wheelchair, you need to contact the TSA Cares helpline toll-free at 855-787-2227 at least 72 hours before travel to find out what to expect at the security checkpoint. 

Don’t think anything will happen, but if it does…

Need another reason to get your departure act together days in advance? Remember Murphy’s Law – "Anything that can go wrong will go wrong and at the worst possible time." 

Interestingly enough, Murphy’s Law actually has its roots in aviation and even though airlines have gotten better about things and there are fewer meltdowns than there were a year ago, don’t think that it’s a perfect system yet.

In an email to ConsumerAffairs, Going.com’s Scott Keyes said that past performance is no guarantee of future results. “I certainly wouldn’t bet my savings on airlines avoiding widespread disruptions, especially considering meltdowns are unpredictable black swan events. But I would bet something that we won’t see disruptions anywhere near last year’s scale,” Keyes said.

If your flight does get delayed or canceled, remember that you do have rights and the TSA is on your side. YourRichBFF explains what on your side means in this video:

As if carry-ons and airlines weren’t enough of a hot mess, the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) says it anticipates that security checkpoints a...

Article Image

Cruises are starting to curry favor with travelers tired of airlines

If you’ve flown anywhere in the last year, you know what a drag flying has become. Long lines, cancellations, unruly passengers, and having to pay for everything except a visit to the bathroom has given cruise lines an opportunity to bring back the joy of taking a trip.

According to new research from Future Market Insights, cruising is growing 12% a year. The reason cruising is taking a chink out of airlines’ armor is because it incorporates all the aspects consumers want in tourism – transportation, accommodation, attractions, and hospitality.

What's behind this trend?

The researchers said one of the key aspects influencing the cruise business is a change in thinking. "Several businesses are emerging, offering a range of amenities to draw clients to meet the need for maritime cross-border travel," they wrote. 

And these companies are putting ships on the seas like there's no tomorrow. In December 2022, 239 ships entered commercial service, a 15-fold year-over-year increase.

MSC Cruises, with 13 ships and 50,326 beds, is ranked first on the list of ships at sea; then Carnival (17 ships,  54,364 berths); and Royal Caribbean (20 ships, 71,800 berths).

Cruising is no longer a ‘70s “Love Boat” thing, either, but loaded with things airlines can’t provide. Cruise companies these days offer in-room spa treatments, skydiving simulators, pickleball, and Pilates. And many sweeten the deal with hundreds in on-board credit, lots of dining choices, and free drinks.

Travel experts give their thumbs ups

ConsumerAffairs asked travel aficionados and experts both why they think cruising is turning into a travel favorite. Here’s what they had to say:

It’s a better deal than flying.

When you factor in everything that’s included – food and drink, entertainment, rooms, etc. – cruising is about ten times cheaper than air travel because it uses bigger vessels with a higher capacity,  Alexandra Dubakova, Travel Expert and CMO of FreeTour.com, told ConsumerAffairs.

“You get to explore the sea, tour different countries, enjoy different dining experiences, engage in other activities, and shop around, making cruising more fun and enjoyable,” Dubakova said.

If you need a thumbnail idea of what the daily cost of a cruise plays out to be, Cruise Critic Executive Editor, Chris Gray Faust, told us that $75 is the average. “It’s hard to think of a land-based option that’s comparable – especially when you consider what that cost includes.” 

However, consumers trying to “cheap out” might find themselves disappointed. “The cruising ‘experience’ is not a standard thing,” Dubakova reminds cruise newbies.

“Your cruising experience will depend on what you choose, so do not be tempted with the cheapest deal. Know what experience you are looking for before hunting for deals.”

Relaxation and low price. What's not to like?

One cruise option many don't know about are "repositioning" cruises. Because the cruise lines have to take their boats from the Caribbean back to Europe in late Spring for journeys there, most offer repositioning cruises at hard-to-believe prices.

For example, ConsumerAffairs saw a 14-day repositioning cruise from Ft. Lauderdale to Rome for under $800 (interior room). 

Besides the plus of the price, you're also relaxing on the ocean for the first seven days before you hit the Azores, and then, you're off to Spain, then Italy.

It’s not an 'old people’s' thing anymore

If you have a preconceived notion that cruises are nothing but fading baby boomers, youmight have to rethink your position. The average cruise passenger these days is 47 years old, with the three largest demographic groups being: 40 to 49 – 15%; 50 to 59 – 18%; and 60 to 69 – 19%.

The first words out of travel guru Rocky Trifari’s mouth were “Unlike air travel, you only need to unpack once on a cruise.” Whew, that’s a relief.

“From that point on, your hotel essentially moves with you even if you visit multiple destinations. This effectively eliminates the potentially stressful hassle of constantly repacking and unpacking if you have an itinerary that involves visiting more than one destination.”

Opposed to flying, Trifari gives a thumbs-up to the social aspect of cruising, “If you are fortunate enough to meet some new friends aboard the ship, you can spend the rest of the time visiting various destinations with a group of travelers you’ve gotten to know on board.” 

However, cruises are not perfect

Now that you’ve heard the pluses, you need to know the minuses of cruising. 

Who’s in charge? You’re not in charge of the itinerary – you’re going where the ship’s going. If you want to go to  Mexico City or Switzerland, you’re better off flying. 

If you want to spend a few days at a certain place, you’re not likely to get that, either. Cruises try to hit as many places as they can and it’s usually a day in a port and you’re gone. That means, if you want to absorb Barcelona from A-Z, you should plan to go there 3-4 days before you set sail.

A la carte can eat you alive.You’d be smart to get all the perks you can up front, too. Anything not included is expensive, such as internet or cocktails.

“Those with sea sickness should be warned that cruises often travel through rough waters, depending on the time of year and conditions,” David Triana, avid cruiser and account executive with Delight Labs, said.

It's also wise to confirm all the details upfront. In ConsumerAffairs reviews of travel agencies, we found a number of complaints about promise vs. performance. Many of those concerned travelers not getting everything they thought they'd get. Our number one takeaway is to get everything you think you’re supposed to get upfront, detailed in an email, before you put the charge on your credit card.

Finally, big ships can be overwhelming. If a big ship in the middle of the Atlantic with thousands of others seems a bit too much, first-time cruisers might want to try and go the river cruise route. 

If you’ve flown anywhere in the last year, you know what a drag flying has become. Long lines, cancellations, unruly passengers, and having to pay for ever...

Article Image

American Airlines fined $4.1 million for tarmac delays

The U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) has come down hard on American Airlines, fining the carrier $4.1 million for violating federal statutes and a Department’s rule.

Specifically, the government agency is punishing American for keeping passengers aboard planes on the tarmac for three hours or more without providing them an opportunity to get off the aircraft.

It’s the largest fine DOT has ever levied for a violation of the “tarmac rule.” And apparently, this is not a one-off case.

DOT said its investigation found that American kept dozens of flights stuck on the tarmac for long periods of time without letting passengers off. In addition to the fine, American has been ordered to cease and desist from violating the law. 

“This is the latest action in our continued drive to enforce the rights of airline passengers,” said U.S. Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg. “Whether the issue is extreme tarmac delays or problems getting refunds, DOT will continue to protect consumers and hold airlines accountable.”

Investigation results

DOT said its Office of Aviation Consumer Protection (OACP) found that between 2018 and 2021, American allowed 43 domestic flights to remain on the tarmac for lengthy periods without providing passengers an opportunity to deplane, in violation of the Department’s tarmac delay rule. 

DOT also found that none of the exceptions to the tarmac delay rule, including the safety and security exceptions, applied to those flights. In addition, on one of the 43 flights, passengers were not provided with food and water as required. 

The investigation report said most of the delays occurred at Dallas Fort Worth International Airport and that the delays covered by the investigation affected a total of  5,821 passengers. 

DOT said American Airlines had already made $2.05 in refunds to affected passengers so that amount will be deducted from the fine. DOT said it encourages that practice so that affected passengers are more quickly compensated.

After years of complaints from travelers, DOT has started a new rulemaking process aimed at requiring airlines to provide compensation and cover expenses for amenities such as meals, hotels, and rebooking when airlines are responsible for stranding passengers. 

After a two-year DOT push to improve the passenger experience, the department said the 10 largest airlines now guarantee meals and free rebooking on the same airline and nine guarantee hotel accommodations as part of the Department’s Airline Customer Service Dashboard. 

The U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) has come down hard on American Airlines, fining the carrier $4.1 million for violating federal statutes and a D...

Article Image

Is commercial airline safety getting worse?

Without question commercial airline safety has vastly improved in the last two decades. However, in recent weeks there have been a number of high-profile close calls, where aircraft in the air or on the runway have nearly collided.

The New York Times reports these near accidents occur a lot more than travelers think. For example, it reports a Southwest Airlines jet had to abort a landing at Louis Armstrong Airport in New Orleans last month because another airliner was on the runway, preparing to take off.

The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) says there are multiple layers of safety protecting the traveling public, including Traffic Collision Avoidance Systems on commercial aircraft, surface safety technology at the country's biggest airports and “robust procedures.”

Still, the agency says one close call is one too many. The FAA said it will hold a series of runway safety meetings at approximately 90 airports between now and the end of September.

Runway safety meetings

“Sharing information is critical to improving safety,” said Tim Arel, chief operating officer of the FAA’s Air Traffic Organization. “These meetings, along with other efforts, will help us achieve our goal of zero close calls.”

During these meetings, officials from airports and airlines will identify unique risks to surface safety at that airport and develop plans to mitigate or eliminate the risks. Representatives from the FAA’s air traffic organization, airlines, pilots, airport vehicle drivers and others will participate, the agency said. 

The FAA points out that air travel has never been safer. It says U.S. airlines have transported billions of passengers since 2009 without a fatality.

The Times investigation warns that the streak could end at any time. Its investigators found near misses involving U.S. commercial airlines happen on average multiple times a week.

Not enough air traffic controllers?

“The incidents often occur at or near airports and are the result of human error, the agency’s internal records show,” the investigators wrote. “Mistakes by air traffic controllers – stretched thin by a nationwide staffing shortage – have been one major factor.”

Joe Schlosser, an aviation expert and vice president at ISN, agrees that the demands placed on controllers could be a factor.

"Air traffic control facilities are facing massive labor shortages right now," Schlosser told ConsumerAffairs. "As air traffic controllers work mandatory overtime, many are so fatigued that it is potentially impeding their ability to perform their jobs properly. The return of air traffic from pre-pandemic levels is only exacerbating the issue, as more commercial aircraft are in flight and on the runways."

In response to the Times investigation, the FAA has released data showing that the number and rate of “runway incursions” are steadily declining since the pandemic. The data show there were 1,697 in 2022 and 985 so far this year.

View From The Wing’s analysis of FAA data paints a more troubling image. It reports there were 46 near-collisions in July and 300 over the last 12 months.

Without question commercial airline safety has vastly improved in the last two decades. However, in recent weeks there have been a number of high-profile c...

Article Image

Flying somewhere over Labor Day? Here’s the turbulance you can expect.

The last big travel day before the holidays – Labor Day ‘23 – is about to arrive.

And whether you’ve traveled earlier this summer and think you’ve got a handle on all that could be thrown at you – or this is your first trip in some time – you better be prepared because there’ll be a good number of potential stumbling blocks in your path.

You won’t be the only one traveling

Yes, it would be nice to have the sky and the road to yourself, but no such luck. More than 57% -- which is over 148 million American adults -- intend to travel for Labor Day or Labor Day weekend this year. That's 4.07% more than last year, according to TheVacationer.

Long TSA lines and the ripple of headaches they’ll bring

The U.S. Travel Association tells ConsumerAffairs that aging technology and a lack of TSA agents have caused the air travel system to become inefficient. That means long lines, agents who might be new to the job, and heaven forbid, more missed flights.

How long will it take to get through a TSA checkpoint? Planetware’s latest report says it depends on where you are departing. For example, both Chicago’s O’Hare and Midway, George Bush International in Houston, Washington, D.C.’s Dulles, San Francisco International, and Tampa International could be at a snail’s pace, somewhere between 15 and 20 minutes.

One quick note about Chicago Midway: Planetware says that Midway has reported more flight delays (22.6%) and cancellations (5.7%) than any other major airport in the U.S. since 2014.

Friday and Monday might not be much fun

Travel app Hopper’s lead economist Hayley Berg told ConsumerAffairs that the busiest days to travel will be Friday for departures – with 3.7 million travelers expected to depart from U.S airports – and Monday for return flights – with 3.6 million expected to depart from U.S airports.

If you want better odds, The Vacationer’s Eric Jones says that you should fly out the Tuesday or Wednesday before Labor Day and fly home the Wednesday, Thursday, or Saturday after.

The busiest airports? Here are Berg’s best estimates: 

Busiest airports and times:

  1. Atlanta (ATL) - Estimated Seats Departing: 1,541,254 passengers; Busiest Times: Morning (8 am - 12 pm)

  2. Denver (DEN) - Estimated Seats Departing: 1,024,839 passengers; Busiest Times: Morning (8 am - 12 pm)

  3. Dallas Fort-Worth (DFW) - Estimated Seats Departing: 983,089 passengers; Busiest Times: Evening (4 pm - 8 pm)

  4. Los Angeles (LAX) - Estimated Seats Departing: 927,031 passengers; Busiest Times: Morning (8 am - 12 pm)

  5. Chicago (ORD) - Estimated Seats Departing: 816,943 passengers; Busiest Times: Evening (4 pm - 8 pm)

Maybe even cancel your reservation and fly another airline

Price4Limo shared some interesting information with ConsumerAffairs that it culled from travel data at the Bureau of Transportation Statistics – data that shows the best places to fly and the best airlines to take if having fewer hassles is one of your goals. 

The company’s analysts point to Hawaiian Airlines, Delta Air Lines, and Alaska Airlines as the best airlines to fly because those three have the lowest percentage of departure delays. On the other hand, the analysts' interpretation of the data shows that JetBlue Airways, Allegiant Air, and Frontier Airlines are the worst airlines to fly.

Does that mean you should cancel your flight if you’re on, say, JetBlue? Maybe.

"Canceling a flight can be stressful, especially when concerns about losing money are involved,” Maddie Weirman, part of the creative team at Price4Limo, told ConsumerAffairs.

“In alignment with our recent study, we’ve observed a significant uptick in online searches, with a 19% increase in inquiries about ‘canceling a flight and getting a refund’ over the past year.," Weirman said. "Additionally, searches for ‘compensation for flight delays’ have surged by a remarkable 79%."

Thinking about pulling the plug on your existing reservation? One word of caution: it's not a cakewalk. But if you do, Weirman offers these factors that could influence the difficulty of canceling a flight and obtaining a refund:

Complex policies: "Airlines have a variety of ticket types, each with its own cancellation policies and fees. Understanding these policies can be confusing, leading to difficulties in determining if you can cancel your reservation without losing money," Weirman said.

Non-refundable tickets: Many travelers purchase non-refundable tickets because they are cheaper -- and you may have done the same. Just remember -- those discounted tickets can come with strict cancellation rules and some awfully hefty charges if you do decide to change them.

Time sensitivity: To protect themselves, airlines usually have specific timeframes within which you can cancel and receive a full refund. Miss that window and you could be paying more than you want or more than it's worth changing the flight. 

Reason for cancellation: "The reason for your cancellation can also impact the difficulty of obtaining a refund," Weirman said. "Airlines are more likely to offer flexibility and refunds for cancellations due to factors beyond your control, such as illness or severe weather disruptions."

The last big travel day before the holidays – Labor Day ‘23 – is about to arrive.And whether you’ve traveled earlier this summer and think you’ve got a...

Article Image

More travelers are tracking their own ‘lost’ luggage

It’s a prospect that fills an airline passenger with dread. No, not an emergency landing, but the discovery, once you’re safely on the ground, that the airline has lost your luggage.

It’s happening more often, especially this summer with a huge increase in air travel. It’s happening so often that many travelers are investing in Apple AirTags to track their bags. And it turns out the bags are not always lost.

According to CNN, Sandra Shuster and her 15-year-old daughter Ruby were flying home to Denver from Baltimore with a stopover in Chicago, when they were told at their destination their suitcase was lost.

Using her AirTag, Sandra was able to locate her bag at Chicago’s O’Hare Airport. After she informed United Airlines she was promised the bag would arrive the next day. Then the day after.

“I told them I could see it at Terminal 1 baggage reclaim in Chicago, and they said ‘We have no record of it,’ Shuster told CNN. “I asked them to call Chicago, and they said ‘No, we’re not allowed.’ They said they’d put notes in the system and the baggage team would take care of it.”

Then the airline told her the bag was in Baltimore. Frustrated, Shuster boarded a plane and traveled to Chicago to pick it up herself. 

Traveler’s aid

This doesn’t appear to be an isolated case. A TikTok user named Sarah posted to the social media site that Air France reported her luggage was lost. But she too had placed an AirTag inside her bag.

“It’s literally in the airport,” she reported, saying she got her luggage back but claimed the airline was of little help.

Why are so many bags getting mishandled? CNBC reports airlines have a shortage of baggage handlers as well as other staff. At the same time, summer travel has surged.

Frequent fliers might consider investing in an Airtag, which Apple developed to help consumers keep track of things that often get misplaced, such as keys. 

A single AirTag starts at $29 and Apple sells a four-pack for $88. They not only locate things around the house but can also find things hundreds of miles away.

It’s a prospect that fills an airline passenger with dread. No, not an emergency landing, but the discovery, once you’re safely on the ground, that the air...

Article Image

Staying at an Airbnb or Vrbo any time soon? Private eyes may be watching you.

As vacation home rentals have grown in popularity, battle lines have been drawn between hosts and guests staying at Airbnb, Vrbo, and other homestay companies.

There were issues with hosts charging outrageous hidden fees -- a matter Airbnb recently took head-on -- and disrespecting guests. Now, a new study from Vivint shows that hosts are pushing their control even further. 

Despite guest concerns, 45% of hosts say they’ll be adding extra safeguards for the summer travel season. A good number of those defenses will come from cameras and microphones inside the home – a move that three in four guests say would force them to choose another place to stay.

Then, there are damage deposits. More than a third of the hosts surveyed said they’ve had guests damage their vacation rental, and nearly a quarter believe the damage was intentional, to the tune of an estimated $530 each time it happens. 

Did we do this to ourselves?

Somewhere along the line, something went wrong and fingers can certainly point both ways. Hosts may have gotten greedy with fees and there were some who should’ve never been allowed to rent their home. But travelers also had a hand in this mess, going too far with disregard for a property and partying down.

“Airbnb was initially built on trust. Hosts and guests both got ratings and feedback after their stays, and hosts could decide which guests they wanted at their property,” Thomas Schaper, Head of Product at DACK, Inc., a guest technology company that enables property managers to provide guests with an all-in-one digital stay experience, told ConsumerAffairs.

"However, as they've scaled, the risk of having troublesome guests has risen as well. Hosts began auto-approving all bookings, and not all OTAs (online travel agencies) protect hosts in the same ways; for example, with some OTAs, the host is the merchant of record and is on the hook for fraud, chargebacks, and, more importantly, property damage or theft.”

Schaper suggests that hosts employing cameras and microphones became a push-come-to-shove matter because short-term rentals didn’t have the same security, safety, and protection guards that hotels do.

No front desk clerk to visually review credit card and ID information from the guest in person. No on-site security, no bellhops, etc. that you would see in a larger hotel. “So technology has to safely and fairly fill that void and make contactless check-in a failproof replacement of the traditional front desk,” he said.

Do guests have a way around this?

If cameras are a little too Big Brother for you, you – the guest – have rights that the hosts are supposed to adhere to.

“It's important to know that most rental platforms have strict policies against this -- both Vrbo and Airbnb do – and guests should report any instances immediately,” Hans Mast, a travel expert at Golden Rule Travel, told ConsumerAffairs. “To mitigate these concerns, guests should thoroughly read reviews and ratings of a potential rental. This way, they can avoid properties with red flags and opt for ones with consistently positive feedback.”

A Vivint spokesperson echoed that, adding that if a guest finds one, they should document that in messages with the host and the company the host lists their property with. 

And the damage issue? That's a gray area that guests should take the time to proactively consider. That gray area is whether the damage was pre-existing or the guest in question is the person who did it.

“While accidents do happen, hosts can have an issue with even the most minor of damages and guests can incur a potential fine. Documenting any existing damages or issues immediately after checking in can be a huge help for both hosts and their guests,” the spokesperson added.

As vacation home rentals have grown in popularity, battle lines have been drawn between hosts and guests staying at Airbnb, Vrbo, and other homestay compan...

Article Image

UPDATE: Flying somewhere for the Fourth? Here’s news you might not find anywhere else.

Updated, Friday, June 30.

You can turn on any TV newscast and the first thing you’ll see for the next couple of days is what a hot mess the airlines are. Maybe the hottest mess the industry has seen in several years.

For Friday alone, FlightAware reported total delays within, into, or out of the United States today sat at 1,219, and total cancellations at 922.

“This is not what we want to hear going into a big holiday weekend,” said Teresa Murray, consumer watchdog at U.S. PIRG Education Fund.

“People planning to travel this weekend should take steps now to protect themselves, including learning about their rights, putting trackers in their bags, getting their airline’s app on their phone so they can receive real-time notifications and saving the DOT link that spells out their airline’s guarantees in case of cancellations or delays."

Unfortunately, the potential flood of frustration doesn’t get much attention and ConsumerAffairs thought we’d fill you in on some things you should know about just in case you’re flying out this weekend. Here are some things that you should know about.

The biggest problem no one's talking about

This Saturday, July 1, is the day when wireless carriers can boost their 5G signals. That’s a good thing for those of us on the ground, but it could cause cancellations and delays in situations for planes using older equipment, especially when there’s nasty weather or low visibility. 

And it’s not just a handful of planes, either. Department of Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg said that up to 20% of planes serving U.S. airports don’t yet have updated equipment. 

Misery loves company

Because of the hub-and-spoke system that airlines use, if something goes wrong in, say, Houston, it can affect flights to Phoenix, Los Angeles, New York City, Chicago, etc.

As of early Thursday, according to FlightAware, the top three problem spots on its MiseryMap are O'Hare, Newark, and Boston Logan. After those airports, the other major troubles are at Houston's IAH, Denver, and Atlanta. Most everything out West is fairly smooth sailing, although there were six delays in Phoenix, Seattle, and at Los Angeles' LAX.

The best advice to stay on top of things is bookmarking FlightAware’s Misery Map, FlightAware’s Cancellation dashboard, and FlightAware's updates on individual flights.

Do you have your TSA PreCheck mark on your boarding pass?

You probably assume that the TSA automatically takes care of synching everything up with the airlines, but the answer is no.

If you do not have a TSA PreCheck indicator on your boarding pass, call the TSA Contact Center at (866) 289-9673, or contact them at @AskTSA on Twitter and Facebook Messenger.

Pack an empty bag and know before you go 

When airline passengers begin packing for travel, TSA says they should do it carefully, especially on the return trip when they may have picked up a few items not allowed aboard the aircraft. Screening the bag's contents means you are less likely to be stopped at the security checkpoint for having prohibited items and adding 10-15 minutes of patdowns and inspections.

Prior to packing that empty bag, check TSA’s “What Can I Bring?” tool to know what is prohibited. The most common prohibited items at the TSA checkpoint are drinks and foods that are prohibited according to the liquids, gels and aerosols rule.

They lost your bags? Sorry, but…

A lot of bags will be lost this holiday weekend. Possibly well into the thousands. US Pirg’s flier’s bill of rights says that if your bag is delayed overnight, most airlines set guidelines that allow their employees to reimburse you for some emergency expenses. Plus airlines must refund any checked baggage fees, and reimburse you for the lost items up to $3,800.

It may be too late, but if you have an iPhone, you may want to consider getting an AirTag that would enable you to track your luggage.

Don’t lose your wheels if something goes wrong

If anything takes a turn for the worse, keep your cool. Airlines, airports, local police, and TSA are in harmony anytime someone acts up. If you blow your cool, you run the risk of missing your flight, getting arrested, getting fined or any combination of the three.

Yes, and that includes giving a flight attendant grief. All it takes is one p-o’ed flight attendant to ask the pilot to turn the airplane around and take you back to where you came from and causing you to miss your flight.

You can turn on any TV newscast and the first thing you’ll see for the next couple of days is what a hot mess the airlines are. Maybe the hottest mess the...

Article Image

United's new app feature helps customers re-book and receive meal and hotel vouchers automatically

United Airlines has just made Transportation Secretary Pete Buddideg happy. The company’s latest app helps take the airline off the hook when it comes to addressing at least part of a consumer’s rights on cancellations and delays.

Now, instead of stressing out and waiting in line to talk to an agent or search for options when a flight has been disrupted, United’s new self-service tool automatically presents travelers with personalized re-booking options, bag tracking information, as well as meal and hotel vouchers. 

The company’s decision came from finding itself in a tough spot. Even though United had the lowest mainline flight and seat cancellation rates of any airline in the U.S. in the first quarter of 2023, it still has the most flights impacted by weather given the location of four of its seven major domestic hubs – Chicago, Washington D.C., Denver, and Newark.

"Our goal is to get our customers to their destination on time, but we know things don't always go as planned and that's when a tool like this can make a real difference," said Linda Jojo, chief customer officer for United. 

If you fly United, here’s how it works

Suppose you’re flying United this summer and run into an issue, forcing your flight to be delayed by more than 60 minutes or even canceled completely. In that case, you should automatically see all available options for delays and cancellations on the home screen of the United mobile app. 

Here's how it works:

  • Get notified: Before you do anything else, click the link in the automatic text notification or enter flight details in the mobile app or united.com to open the tool. Once you do that, your reservation is already loaded in the app, and you’ll see a prompt right on the home screen.

  • Check flight and re-booking status: Step two is to confirm the status of your flight and see if you've been re-booked. If you want another flight option, United also offers those and lets you book based on your preference.

  • Track your bags: Follow the status of your checked luggage to see when it is checked in, loaded on your flight and received at your final destination.

  • View eligible vouchers: Receive hotel, meal and/or rideshare vouchers if eligible.

  • Connect to a United customer service agent virtually: Call, text or video chat with a United agent who can offer the same assistance as the agents at the airport.

What it doesn’t cover… yet

While United’s new app takes some of the sting out of a canceled or delayed flight, the Department of Transportation’s (DOT) customer service dashboard says there are still some holes in what it would like the airline to do. Those include:

  • Cash compensation when a cancellation results in passenger waiting for 3 hours or more from the scheduled departure time
  • Credit/travel voucher when cancellation results in passenger waiting for 3 hours or more from the scheduled departure time
  • Frequent flier miles when cancellation results in passenger waiting for 3 hours or more from the scheduled departure time

​However, United isn't the only major U.S. carrier that hasn't stepped up to make those perks available to stranded passengers. American, Delta, Southwest, et al yet to have agreed to those caveats, as well.

As of now, according to the agency's dashboard, JetBlue and Alaska Airlines are the only ones offering credit/travel vouchers when cancellation results in passengers waiting for three hours or more from the scheduled departure time.

And only Alaska offers frequent flier miles when cancellation results in passengers waiting for 3 hours or more from the scheduled departure time.

United Airlines has just made Transportation Secretary Pete Buddideg happy. The company’s latest app helps take the airline off the hook when it comes to a...

Article Image

Good airfares for fall ‘23 just got better

The traveler’s golden “Shoulder Season” has made its first appearances. After Southwest Airlines unleashed a surprise 40%-off flash sale for travel this fall, other airlines are already raising their hands and saying, “Us, too!”

ThePointsGuy (TPG) reports that Aeromexico, Alaska Airlines, American Airlines, Copa Airlines, Delta Air Lines, JetBlue, and United Airlines are all matching Southwest by offering deals to warmer destinations across Mexico, Central America, and the Caribbean. 

One great thing about these sales is that they cover a wide swath of locations, making them convenient for nearly everyone who lives close to a decent-sized city in the country.

TPG says these deals include flights departing from several hubs, including Atlanta, Austin, Baltimore, Boston, Charlotte, Chicago, Dallas, Denver, Houston, Los Angeles, New York City, Seattle, and Washington, D.C. Another plus is that some of these fares are good for up to spring of 2024.

The only iffy thing is that the rug could be pulled out from under these deals at any time, so if you’re interested, you best be making your reservations now.

ConsumerAffairs put these sales to the test on Google Flights and there are considerable savings to be had.

For example, a roundtrip flight from Indianapolis to Miami in early July runs about $375, but in late September, it goes to as low as $156. Cleveland to Phoenix now is costing about $253, but we found roundtrip tickets as low as $138 if we waited until late October.

A new search engine spots the 'perfect' times to travel

Searching for airfares isn’t much fun, but KAYAK has introduced a new “Best Time to Travel” tool that helps consumers find out when to fly and when to book to get the best price.

The widget is helpful in that it can help remove the toil and trouble of going to multiple search engines to gather those data points by yourself. The company says the tool sifts through the billions of pieces of data that others have already used for searches. 

When ConsumerAffairs took the tool for a trial run, it certainly seemed to have a payoff. For example, when we looked at booking a flight from Cincinnati to Rome, its suggestion was to take our trip from 10/3 to 10/16. The reasons it gave were that airfare is lower than normal --  $1,106 during that period compared to a monthly average of $1,192 -- weather will still be good (an avg. of 62F), and it's likely we wouldn't see a lot of crowds.

The traveler’s golden “Shoulder Season” has made its first appearances. After Southwest Airlines unleashed a surprise 40%-off flash sale for travel this fa...

Article Image

Summer flights mean bummers and plights. Here are the airports that cause the most issues.

With Memorial Day behind us, the busy summer travel season has officially begun - with TSA airport volumes already exceeding pre-pandemic levels.

In the wake of thousands of flights being delayed across the U.S. last week, many travelers are asking, should we expect another hectic summer of travel?

In a word, yes. In its new Summer Disruption Outlook, the experts behind travel app Hopper dug into all the TSA data from last summer to come up with a ranking of the U.S. airports expected to be the worst. Plus, the Hopper analysts offered ConsumerAffairs readers some free advice for anyone who’s taking to the skies and possibly flying out of or going to one of these airports.

The worst

The worst airports in the U.S. are the ones you’d expect them to be just because they’re hubs for major airlines, such as Chicago where American and United route a lot of their traffic. 

Worst U.S. Airports for Summer Travel

  1. Chicago (MDW) - 44% of flights disrupted during summer 2022

  2. Baltimore (BDWI) - 39% of flights disrupted during summer 2022

  3. Newark (EWR) - 37% of flights disrupted during summer 2022

  4. Dallas (DAL) - 35% of flights disrupted during summer 2022

  5. New York City (JFK) - 34% of flights disrupted during summer 2022

The busiest

You could probably close your eyes and guess the busiest airport in the U.S. You know, the one where nearly 100 million people travel through this year? The big Delta hub? Yep, Atlanta.

Busiest U.S. Airports for Summer Travel

  1. Atlanta (ATL) - 26% of flights disrupted during summer 2022

  2. Chicago (ORD) - 25% of flights disrupted during summer 2022

  3. Dallas (DFW) - 28% of flights disrupted during summer 2022

  4. Denver (DEN) - 30% of flights disrupted during summer 2022

  5. Los Angeles (LAX) - 24% of flights disrupted during summer 2022

Taking care of the investment in your flight plans

Travelers to Europe this summer will want to make sure they get the most out of their money with airfares up 26% from 2019. These top tips from Hopper's experts will hopefully help you travel smoothly this summer:

Add travel protection. There are a few ways to go about this. Some credit card companies offer travel protection so check with the one you used to buy your ticket. Then, there are companies such as Hopper that offer protection such as Flight Disruption Guarantee, which allows you to rebook a new flight immediately on any carrier, if your flight is delayed, canceled or you miss a connection. Thirdly, if you’re price shopping, there are other worthy travel insurers, but it’s important to ask them if they offer that specific type of coverage.

Take the first flight of the day. Getting out of bed at 5 a.m. isn’t any fun, but it might pay off if a storm rolls into town or there’s a domino of disruptions over a certain airline’s route. Flights departing after 9 am are two times more likely to be delayed than those departing between 5-8 am.

Don't leave it up to chance. Build in a buffer day! It's always better to be safe by adding an extra day to your trip, especially for big events or major trips. Should any delays or disruptions interfere with your travel plans, then you'll have some breathing room.

Make sure you sign up for alerts and check flight status before you leave for the airport. Things happen quickly in the airline world. Pilots don’t show up, bad weather causes delays and cancellations, all types of things that can drag a trip down.

You'll want to be aware of delays and cancellations as soon as possible so sign up for whatever the airline you’re flying on offers: the option of receiving text, email, or in-app notifications about changes to their itinerary, including delays and cancellations. If your trip is delayed or canceled, know what options you have, including other flights heading to your destination. 

Whatever you do…

The airline industry is a royal mess right now and the pressure of summer travel is only going to complicate things further. No matter where you’re going, it’s important to know what’s going on so if you run into a problem you know what to do and these two websites will do the trick.

The Department of Transportation’s Airline Customer Service Dashboard. If something goes wrong, you’ll be able to quickly find what the airlines are supposed to be doing to take care of you and the situation as well as who’s committed to doing what they’re supposed to do and the laggards.

The other is FlightAware.com. This site is ConsumerAffairs’ go-to for things like delays and cancellations and within a matter of seconds, anyone can find out where their flight is, what flights are canceled, which ones are delayed, what airports are having issues, and something called a “Misery Map” that isolates each airport and shows what routes are experiencing problems.

With Memorial Day behind us, the busy summer travel season has officially begun - with TSA airport volumes already exceeding pre-pandemic levels.In the...

Article Image

Airbnb is getting tougher with a new anti-party crackdown

If you’re planning to rent an Airbnb residence anytime down the road and throw a party, you better look for someplace else. The company is rolling out measures across the country to help reduce the risk of disruptive and unauthorized parties – especially over major holidays like the Fourth of July holiday weekend.

By and large, most Airbnb renters are probably good guests and happy just to have a place to relax, but the company says it has been forced to act because lately, some guests have broken the rules. 

“Our anti-party system for the upcoming holiday weekends aims to help do this by taking steps to identify certain potentially higher-risk one-night and two-night booking attempts by guests of entire home listings, and preventing those bookings from being made,” the company wrote in a recent blog post.

“The system looks at factors relating to the guest’s account and their booking attempt that may indicate a higher risk for a disruptive or unauthorized party incident, like whether the guest has a history of positive reviews (or lack of positive reviews), the distance to the listing, whether the booking is last-minute, among other considerations.”

The filters guests have to get past

Depending on how you look at computer systems that analyze people and situations based on the information a person inputs when making a reservation, Airbnb’s anti-party filters don’t play around. The system will not only block home bookings that are identified as potentially higher-risk, but it tells guests right up front that if they break the rules, they may be subject to suspension or removal from the platform.  

Overall, Airbnb’s filters appear to be doing their job. The company says that since introducing its party ban in August 2020, it’s seen a global 55% year-over-two-year decrease in the rate of party reports. 

However, computers can be fallible.

Unfortunately, in situations where a system is constructed to “think” a certain way based on the information that’s imputed, the human on the other end who gets rejected has little immediate recourse.

There were a number of ConsumerAffairs reviewers who were stung by Airbnb’s anti-party filters in some rather befuddling ways.

“Traveling on business for the last 40 years, and with many more to go, I was thrilled to see Airbnb. My reviews are all 5-star excellent. This week, for no reason whatsoever, the Airbnb computer rudely informed me that I was booking for a party,” Joe of St. Albert Calif., wrote. 

“I'm an old guy who doesn't drink and is asleep by 9 pm nightly. I'm not sure how Airbnb thinks it's appropriate to offend people like that. Particularly as a regular business traveler, I can't deal with a flaky company whose computer algorithms override common sense.”

Another person who booked with Airbnb got rejected by the anti-party filter because they showed signs of a potential party. Alexis from Gainesville Fla., said she spent 40 minutes on the phone with Airbnb, only to be told that someone else would contact me in 24-48 hours. That time came and went, though, and so was the listing. 

“When I finally found somewhere else for us to go in a different city because the other was unavailable. I still got the same error message and nothing was resolved. They are still passing me around to other people. I will not use them in the future.”

Airbnb responsds

If an Airbnb guest would like to appeal this decision, they can do so by contacting the company. Here's more info.

If you’re planning to rent an Airbnb residence anytime down the road and throw a party, you better look for someplace else. The company is rolling out meas...

Article Image

The TSA has new rules for fliers. Do you know what they are?

As summer travel begins this Friday – Memorial Day weekend – and continues through Labor Day, the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) is preparing airport security checkpoints nationwide to screen high volumes of passengers.

About 2.6 million passengers are expected to be screened on Friday, May 26, the busiest day of the long weekend.

Many of those passengers may not have flown in a while and the TSA suggests they get caught up on all the changes. Even those who have flown in the last few months may be in for a couple of nuances as well.

Here’s what the agency shared with ConsumerAffairs:

Update on TSA PreCheck

Any parent or guardian already enrolled in TSAPrecheck can now accompany teens aged 13-17 to a TSA PreCheck screening when the TSA PreCheck indicator appears on the teen's boarding pass. Children 12 and under may accompany an enrolled parent or guardian without restriction at any time.

“Passengers can help as well by being prepared, by having their identification ready when they begin screening and checking to make sure they aren’t bringing firearms, oversized liquids or any other prohibited item into the checkpoint,” said TSA Administrator David Pekoske. “One person’s actions can delay screening for everyone else.”

Are you who you say you are?

TSA is deploying new technology solutions nationwide to modernize airport checkpoints, enhance security effectiveness, and improve the passenger experience. Credential Authentication Technology (CAT) units now verify a passenger's identification credentials, flight details, and pre-screening status, such as TSA PreCheck, without a boarding pass. With CAT, passengers only need to provide their acceptable photo identification to the officer. 

But, heads up – TSA officers may perform additional passenger verification if they think it’s needed.

If anyone is worried about their images being scanned, the agency said that those travelers may opt out in favor of an alternative identity verification process without losing their place in line. 

More scrutiny of carry-ons

TSA recently installed new state-of-the-art Computed Tomography (CT) units nationwide, which the agency says greatly improves scanning and threat detection capabilities for carry-on bags. 

The upside is that the new CT units give TSA officers the ability to review a 3-D image of passengers’ bags while reducing the need to physically search the contents of those bags. That means that travelers screened in security lanes with CT units no longer have to remove their 3-1-1 liquids or laptops, but they must place every carry-on item, including bags, into a bin for screening. 

Pack an empty bag

The TSA says that it’s been monitoring what trends are happening at U.S. airports and recommends that travelers start with a completely empty bag and take a minute to know what items can be carried on before they go. 

“When airline passengers begin packing for travel with an empty bag, they are less likely to be stopped at the security checkpoint for having prohibited items. Prior to packing that empty bag, check TSA’s What Can I Bring? tool to know what is prohibited,” the agency noted. 

Guns’ll getcha!

One huge concern is the number of firearms that passengers have tried to get through security checkpoints in the last few months. TSA officers intercepted 1,508 firearms at airport security checkpoints during the first quarter of 2023 – more than 93% of them loaded. 

If you try to get a firearm through security, you will get stopped, maybe fined, and the government will confiscate your gun and you won't get it back.

And that fine isn’t cheap, either. Trying to bring a loaded firearm or unloaded firearm with accessible ammunition in a carry-on could cost you $3,000 - $10,700, plus a criminal referral. Unloaded firearms carry a potential fine of  $1,500 - $5,370 + criminal referral for anyone who tries to bring one through a TSA checkpoint. 

For anyone who wants to travel with a firearm, the rule is simple: “You may still travel with a firearm – it just must be properly packed in your checked baggage and you must declare it to the airline,” Pekoske said. 

As summer travel begins this Friday – Memorial Day weekend – and continues through Labor Day, the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) is preparing...

Article Image

Southwest Airlines changes its early boarding policy and it’ll cost some customers more

If you fly Southwest Airlines a lot and have been enjoying the airline’s option to pay a little extra to board sooner, your pocketbook will be enjoying that feature a little less the next time you fly.

In an internal memo shared with View from the Wing, Southwest’s Upgraded Boarding -- which used to cap out at $50 -- will now cost between $30 and $80 depending on the length and popularity of each flight. And those dollar figures can change at any time, too.

“The airline gave employees talking points that are… somewhat suspect,” View from the Wing’s Gary Leff wrote. “They claim to be doing [this] to ‘protect the value’ that Upgraded Boarding ‘offers to our customers’ as the feature ‘becomes more popular on specific routes.’ But this makes no sense at all.”

Southwest's side of the story

Southwest sees it differently, though. “This is another way we’re different. Other airlines charge you fees for things you need or have to have. This is a service that has a value that some customers are willing to purchase. When they do, it helps us keep fares low for everyone,” the company’s memo said.

When Leff asked the airline for a direct response, their official statement was this:

“Upgraded Boarding is one of Southwest’s most popular ancillary products, allowing customers the option to buy an upgraded boarding position in Group A1-A15 (when available). We’ve shared with our employees that Upgraded Boarding now will be offered in a variable range of $30 to $80. Upgraded Boarding price points will work the same as they do today whereby prices can vary based on the length and popularity of each flight. Price points within the new range are subject to change at any time, as they do today. We hope our customers continue to enjoy this product.”

The only people escaping this change are those who hold one of Southwest’s premium co-brand cards from Chase. They’ll still be able to do their free four-times-a-year boarding upgrades without paying or being charged extra.

If you fly Southwest Airlines a lot and have been enjoying the airline’s option to pay a little extra to board sooner, your pocketbook will be enjoying tha...

Article Image

Southwest Airlines pilots vote to authorize a strike

Just ahead of the Memorial Day weekend, summer travel challenges may be building. Southwest Airlines pilots have voted to authorize a strike if contract negotiations fail.

Earlier this month pilots at American Airlines, who are also in contract negotiations with the carrier, took similar action.

That’s not to say pilots at either airline will actually go on strike, but it’s enough to make travelers booked on either of the airlines later in the summer nervous. Airline capacity has already been reduced because of fewer pilots. A reduction in American and Southwest flights would place added strain on the system.

At this point, almost no one is anticipating a Southwest strike, even though 99% of pilots gave the green light. Industry experts say the strike vote is likely a muscle-flexing move to put pressure on the airline to agree to a favorable deal. For its part, the airline doesn't appear worried.

“We are staffed and prepared to welcome travelers for their summer travel plans,” Southwest said in a statement.

The airline industry is different from other types of businesses when it comes to work stoppages. Under federal law, union employees at the nation’s airlines can’t walk out unless a mediator has determined further negotiations are pointless.

A number of grievances

Still, Southwest Airlines Pilots Association (SWAPA) President Casey Murray suggests the union has a number of grievances and will drive a hard bargain.

 "The lack of leadership and the unwillingness to address the failures of our organization have led us to this point,” Murray said. “Our pilots are tired of apologizing to our passengers on behalf of a company that refuses to place its priorities on its internal and external customers."

New rules proposed by the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) may also put added pressure on the two airlines. DOT has started the rulemaking process with the goal of requiring airlines to give stranded passengers compensation and reimbursement for meals, hotels, and rebooking when the airline is responsible for flight cancellations. 

Just ahead of the Memorial Day weekend, summer travel challenges may be building. Southwest Airlines pilots have voted to authorize a strike if contract ne...

Article Image

DOT wants rules forcing airlines to cover expenses and compensate stranded passengers

When an airline is responsible for stranding passengers at an airport, what should it do for those customers? Transportation (DOT) Secretary Pete Buttigieg says it's pretty clear -- passengers deserve compensation and reimbursement for meals, hotels, and rebooking. 

This week, Buttigieg’s DOT announced plans to launch a new rulemaking aimed directly at bringing that wish all the way home.

The DOT has been after this for two years, trying to reverse the trend of negative airline passenger experience and it’s got a lot to show for its efforts. The 10 largest airlines now guarantee meals and free rebooking on the same airline and nine guarantee hotel accommodations as part of the Department’s Airline Customer Service Dashboard at the new FlightRights.gov. Also on the new dashboard are updated commitments airlines have made to allowing families to sit together for free.

The arm twisting that still remains

Buttigieg wants these changes to be mandatory. However, he's got some work to do because no airline has committed to offering everything the DOT wants, at least not yet. 

The closest to perfect is Alaska Airlines which checks seven of the eight commitment boxes for “controllable cancellations” and JetBlue which checks six of the eight. 

Dragging their feet on what the DOT wants are Frontier, which has agreed to only two of eight things the DOT is asking for, and Allegiant which has agreed to only four commitments.

The one glaring holdout that no airline has said yes to is “cash compensation when a cancelation results in passengers waiting for three hours or more from the scheduled departure time.”

Given how that commitment could become a backbreaker, the DOT’s new proposal allows for vouchers/credit, frequent flier miles, as well as cash when a cancelation or delay results in passengers waiting for three hours or more for scheduled departure time.

“When an airline causes a flight cancelation or delay, passengers should not foot the bill,” Buttigieg said. “This rule would, for the first time in U.S. history, propose to require airlines to compensate passengers and cover expenses such as meals, hotels, and rebooking in cases where the airline has caused a cancelation or significant delay.” 

Travelers speak out on what airlines to avoid

If anyone hasn’t booked their summer travel, yet, and the DOT’s new dashboard gives them pause on a certain airline, there’s also a new survey from TheVacationer where Americans had a chance to voice their own opinion on which airlines they avoid flying on at all costs, too. Drum roll, please…

1. Spirit Airlines — 21.06%

2. Allegiant Air — 16.36%

3. American Airlines — 14.40%

4. Frontier Airlines — 14.30%

5. Delta Air Lines — 12.63%

6. JetBlue — 12.63%

7. Alaska Airlines — 10.68%

8. Southwest Airlines — 10.28%

9. United Airlines — 7.64%

10. Hawaiian Airlines — 5.48%

“This means more than one out of every five people you come across will not fly on Spirit under any circumstances,” TheVacationer’s Eric Jones said. “Based on the recent census, the 21.06% that said this equates to more than 54 million people. Having had a few bad experiences with Spirit myself, I can see why Spirit won the contest of airline Americans are most likely to avoid at all costs.”

Jones added that despite these numbers, nearly half of American adults do not avoid flying on any airline. And the reasons they give are because cost and flight dates and times are the most important factors.

“With continued inflation, there should be no surprise that nearly one-third of all American adults said the cost of the flight is most important to them regardless of the airline,” Jones added.

When an airline is responsible for stranding passengers at an airport, what should it do for those customers? Transportation (DOT) Secretary Pete Buttigieg...

Article Image

Check your upcoming flight. It might have been cancelled.

The kickoff of the summer travel season is still a month away, but with all we’ve seen this year already – Southwest’s computer glitch, American pilots voting to strike, and airlines pulling out of markets – anyone flying this summer should be ready for things to go haywire. 

There will probably be the usual weather-related cancellations and delays, but Scott Keyes of Going.com says that the domino that’s in the most precarious position is that Delta, United, JetBlue, and American have gotten the Federal Aviation Administration’s (FAA) approval allowing them to cut back on flights.

Travelers might think there’s a lot that could go wrong given the FAA’s okay, but these preemptive cuts are meant to result in fewer disruptions and less last-minute scrambling down the line. 

“On the other hand, travel demand is at its highest all year, meaning the system is more strained. During the summer, there are comparatively fewer airplanes on reserve—they’re all out flying—so when flights get canceled, there are fewer back-ups to take their place,” Keyes explained to ConsumerAffairs.

The impacts and the options – both good and bad

While this runway of cutbacks may be paved with good intentions, Keyes said that the worst part of this flight cancellation circus is that while it means fewer flights, it could also mean higher fares.

“However, there are a few groups of travelers that these cancellations do bode well for. First, people who have already booked their flights into or out of New York. You’ve already locked in a lower price than the people who have yet to book and are now seeing fares spike. Plus your flight is now more likely to arrive on time.

Keyes said the second group of travelers who are in luck are people whose flights get canceled. It’s frustrating enough anytime a flight is canceled, but in this situation, there are several silver linings, especially when they’re canceled this far in advance. 

Request a full cash refund: “If the new flight does not work for you, you have the right to get your money back,” Keyes said.

Accept the airline’s new booking: If an airline cancels a flight, the airline will probably rebook the flier on a new flight automatically. And if that new flight works for the traveler’s schedule, all’s good!

Request a different flight: Keyes told ConsumerAffairs that if an airline rebooks someone on a new flight that doesn’t work with the traveler’s plans, they can request a different flight at no additional charge.

“This can work in your favor if your original flight was a less-than-ideal itinerary—say it left super in the morning or you had a long layover. You can switch to an optimal itinerary, like one that leaves a little later or is a direct flight,” he said.

A reason to love New York

For those in New York: Keyes says that for people flying in or out of New York City – the U.S.’ largest market with four regional airports in the mix – these cuts are not ideal, but his researchers found a somewhat under-the-radar group of travelers that benefits from those NYC-area flight cancellations.

“Take JetBlue, for instance. When JetBlue cuts flights for the summer, those pilots, planes, and crews get reallocated to other JetBlue flights around the country, meaning that there is added capacity in other JetBlue destinations and lower fares in those cities than you would’ve otherwise seen,” Keyes said. “So if you’re flying into or out of Fort Lauderdale, you may see more flights and lower fares thanks to these New York cuts.”

“The knee-jerk reaction to a canceled flight is to be frustrated, and we definitely get why. Upon closer inspection, canceled flights this summer can actually open up your options, whether you’re looking to reclaim some money, book a better flight, or take advantage of airline deals from other airports around the country,” Keyes concluded.

The kickoff of the summer travel season is still a month away, but with all we’ve seen this year already – Southwest’s computer glitch, American pilots vot...

Article Image

American Airlines pilots vote to authorize a strike

Flying on American Airlines (AA) anytime soon? You better keep tabs on your flight because the 15,000-strong Allied Pilots Association (APA) has voted in favor of authorizing a strike.

This push-come-to-shove couldn’t happen at a better time for those pilots. They have a busy travel schedule around the corner and that will no doubt give them some leverage in working out an agreement.

“The summer travel season is almost here, and we’re all wondering whether this will be another summer of uncertainty for American Airlines,” said Ed Sicher, APA President. “Fortunately, there is an alternative. By embracing the win-win scheduling and work rule improvements APA has presented at the bargaining table, management can take steps to improve the airline’s operational reliability and efficiency.”

In a demonstration of their resolve, APA members will conduct informational picketing today at all 10 of the airline's major hubs: Boston (BOS), Charlotte (CLT), Chicago (ORD), Dallas/Fort Worth (DFW), Los Angeles (LAX), Miami (MIA), New York (LGA), Philadelphia (PHL), Phoenix (PHX), and Washington, D.C. (DCA).

"We remain confident that an agreement for our pilots is within reach and can be finalized quickly. The finish line is in sight," American Airlines said in an email to ConsumerAffairs.

"We understand that a strike authorization vote is one of the important ways pilots express their desire to get a deal done and we respect the message of voting results. Importantly, the results don’t change our commitment or distract us from working expeditiously to complete a deal. We remain focused on completing the handful of matters necessary to reach an agreement our pilots deserve."

What American customers need to know

A spokesperson for APA said that there shouldn’t be an immediate effect on travel plans, but that all depends on what happens at the negotiating table. 

The APA spokesperson said the 67 canceled and 92 delayed AA flight interruptions currently shown on FlightAware are not related to the picketing and that all of the pilots participating in the picket line were already scheduled to be off-duty on Monday. 

Anyone holding a ticket on American flights should frequently check their AA app or the airline’s website for any changes in their scheduled departure.

Flying on American Airlines (AA) anytime soon? You better keep tabs on your flight because the 15,000-strong Allied Pilots Association (APA) has voted in f...

Article Image

Want to make your trip cushier? Airport lounges can be worth their weight in gold.

If you’re flying somewhere this summer and think you’ll be hungry or thirsty by the time you get on the plane, you’ll certainly wind up paying the prices airport food vendors are charging these days. 

Travelers have had enough of overpriced food and drink, like $27 for a Sam Adams beer and $18 for a small pepperoni pizza, but one travel expert says that if you play your cards right, you can get inside a major airline’s lounge for little to nothing and eat and drink to your heart’s content.

You also get to escape those noisy waiting areas and time scouring the hallways looking for a power outlet to charge your devices. Some lounges even have showers for travelers looking for a quick refresh.

“With so many ways to get lounge access today, from credit cards, lounge membership programs, and day passes, a comfortable space with amenities is never too far out of reach,” Katy Nastro of Going.com, told ConsumerAffairs.

“If you’re considering paying high markups on sour patch kids and pretzels, why not use those funds towards a relaxing space with unlimited snacks and fast wifi while you’re at it?”

Two 'free’ish' ways into an airport lounge

Nastro's primer on how a traveler can get access to lounge life is fairly 1-2-3’ish. On top of automatic lounge access for those flying in First or Business class or who have Elite status with an airline because of all the miles they’ve acquired, there are also ways to get in for free, too. 

There are two “frees” – one truly free and one sort of free. If you’re a member of the military, American Airlines Admirals Club and United Airlines United Club both offer complimentary lounge access to active military members who present their military ID and same-day ticket on that airline, in any class at the lounge door. American Airlines requires you to be in uniform, while United does not, Nastro said.

The other “free” is when a traveler has a certain credit card. You’ve probably seen all those airline-branded credit card offers land in your mailbox over the years and as competition has gotten fiercer, the deals have gotten sweeter. Many credit cards include complimentary lounge access as a cardholder benefit, as ConsumerAffairs Kathryn Parkman found, including Chase Sapphire Reserve and the American Express Platinum card.

However, when it comes to airline-branded credit cards, remember that it’s “pay to play” and most any credit card that provides lounge access charges an annual fee – and those can run anywhere from under $100 to more than $500. Nastro tosses in this reminder for those situations: in addition to being a cardholder, you may also need to enroll in a lounge’s membership program before you receive your lounge benefits.

“Check your credit card’s details for more info before you travel,” she said.

Day and annual passes

The two most intriguing lounge access suggestions Nastro shared are subscription-based – where a person buys access to an airport lounge for a day or a year.

Examples that Nastro gave for day passes are American Airlines Admirals Club and United Airlines United Club. Passes can be purchased for $59 by those flying either the parent airline or a partner airline. 

As for longer-term passes, he suggests a company called Priority Pass that allows travelers to pick and choose access to about 1,300 airport lounges in 650 airports across 148 countries. Memberships range from $99 to $429. 

For travelers who want a specific perk, the amenities at participating lounges range from comped refreshments and free wi-fi to spa treatments, massage rooms, and sleeping areas, Nastro said. Parkman noted that one credit card that includes free Priority Pass membership as a card benefit is Chase Sapphire Reserve.

If you’re flying somewhere this summer and think you’ll be hungry or thirsty by the time you get on the plane, you’ll certainly wind up paying the prices a...

Article Image

Southwest Airlines runs into another major technical glitch, affecting more than 2,000 flights

Southwest Airlines (SWA) had another hiccup, Tuesday -- one that's added to the hacking cough of cancelations and delays the airline has been through this over the last four months.

The company suspended all flights on Tuesday morning to work through data connection issues resulting from a firewall failure, according to the airline. By the end of the day according to FlightAware, 2,414 flights were delayed – 57% of those scheduled -- and 14 canceled completely.

“We ask that travelers use Southwest.com to check flight status or visit a Southwest Airlines Customer Service Agent at the airport for assistance with travel needs. We appreciate the patience of our Customers and Employees during this morning’s brief disruption,” the airline said in a statement.

As for early Thursday, all appears to be good -- for now. When ConsumerAffairs checked Flight Aware disruptions, there were none reported by SWA.

How travel insurance would’ve helped those caught in this situation

Analysts at Squaremouth.com, a travel insurance comparison and quoting engine, shared insight on travel insurance coverage for SWA’s impacted flights and said that those who have a travel insurance policy may be covered if their trip was impacted by the Southwest travel disruption. The most likely benefit to apply is Travel Delay. 

“Many policies can cover ‘any delay of a common carrier’,” the analysts said in an email to ConsumerAffairs. “In this case, the Travel Delay benefit can refund your expenses during a significant delay, including coverage for meals and accommodations. In order for coverage to apply, the delay must last three to 12 hours, depending on the policy.”

Specifically, if a delay forces a traveler to miss their connecting flight, they may also be covered for additional costs needed to catch up to their trip. 

“While today’s disruption did not lead to many outright cancellations, if your original Southwest flight was delayed more than 12 hours and you were forced to cancel your trip, your travel insurance policy’s Trip Cancellation benefit can cover your prepaid and non-refundable trip costs. Travelers whose flights were canceled can also contact Southwest directly for a refund,” Squaremouth said.

It added that if Southwest’s problems continue, it has prepared a special Southwest Travel Disruption Travel Insurance Information Center that breaks down coverage information for travelers and offers updates as the situation unfolds.

Southwest Airlines (SWA) had another hiccup, Tuesday -- one that's added to the hacking cough of cancelations and delays the airline has been through this...

Article Image

Major airlines cut back on summer schedules and leave some markets completely

American, Frontier, and United have cut some flights from their schedules due to delays in delivering new jets and a shortage of pilots. And, nope, we’re not back in COVID-19, either.

Reports from various sources say that the impact will hit both big and small markets alike.

A spokesperson for United put the blame on the U.S. pilot shortage that’s affecting regional carriers more than long-haulers.

“But pilots are not the only issue,” AirlineWeekly’s Edward Russell said. “Continuing aircraft delivery delays at Airbus and Boeing have also hamstrung airline schedules; the latest example being American’s decision to suspend flights between Philadelphia and Madrid in May and June due to late Boeing 787 deliveries.”

Russell says that there's a third problem – a shortage of air traffic controllers – which caused the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to step in and suspend usage rules for 10% of the slots at airports in New York and Washington, D.C.

Frontier’s cutting 14 routes

Frontier is also chopping some of its routes, but basically because they’re dead weight. A Frontier Airlines spokesperson told The Points Guy that it periodically reviews and updates routes based on demand, seasonality, and other factors. It’s not pulling out of 13 of those markets completely, but it is hanging it up in Rochester, N.Y., (ROC) where its bread and butter has been regular flights to and from Orlando. Those flights will cease on May 8. 

United chops 17

United is completely getting out of Erie, Pa., and will cut 16 other regional routes from its network. The Points Guy reported the changes, outlining everything that’s getting taken off the board. They include:

Chicago O’Hare to Bismarck, N.D.; Charlottesville, Va.; Jackson, Miss.; Pasco-Tri-Cities, Wash.; and Redmond, Ore. 

Denver to Dayton, Ohio. 

Houston Bush to Alexandria, La.; Columbia, S.C.; and Akron, Ohio

Newark to Oklahoma City; Omaha, Neb.; and Knoxville, Tenn.

Washington Dulles to Allentown, Pa.; Lexington, Ky.; Madison, Wis.; Oklahoma City; and Pensacola, Fla. 

American’s cuts hit Philadelphia pretty hard

American had already announced plans to eliminate 3,729 flights – about 10% – from its summer schedule at Philadelphia International Airport (PHL). Those flights won’t operate from June through August. writes Holden Wilen and Emma Dooling at Philadelphia Business Journal.

Do you have a reservation on one of these routes?

It's a safe bet that any airline that cuts a flight from its schedule will make things right with the traveler. For example, in American's situation, a spokesperson said anyone whose flights were changed will be granted alternate options and, if there’s a traveler who can’t be accommodated, refunds will be available because of the airline’s schedule-changing policy. You can find United's schedule change policy here, and Frontier's here.

American, Frontier, and United have cut some flights from their schedules due to delays in delivering new jets and a shortage of pilots. And, nope, we’re n...

Article Image

Some airports are going to be madhouses this spring break, study suggests

For the next few weeks, airports are going to be bustling with travelers trying to get to their spring break destinations, but AirHelp, an air passenger rights company, says that some airports aren’t equipped to handle the influx.

Based on its data of airports with the most flight disruptions in the month of February – AirHelp says it’s putting travelers on alert that they should be prepared to sit and wait at certain airports.

Going to Hawaii? Thru Dallas? Anywhere in Nevada?

At the top of the list of airports with the highest percentage of flight disruptions is Kahului Airport (OGG) in Mauiwhere 30.82% of flights were disrupted last month. 

The others in the Top 5 were:

  • Reno/Tahoe International Airport (RNO): 29.15% of flights disrupted;
  • Las Vegas' Harry Reid International Airport (LAS): 28.52% of flights disrupted;
  • Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport (DFW): 28.51% of flights disrupted; and
  • Boston's Logan International Airport (BOS): 28.23% of flights disrupted.

When it comes to flight cancellations, anyone going through, to, or from Dallas might want to rethink their routing. Dallas had two airports in the top five for the highest percentage of canceled flights in February – Dallas Love Field (4.85%) and Dallas/Fort Worth International (4.6%). 

Students at the University of Tennessee’s Knoxville campus shouldn’t have any problems flying out, though. AirtHelp deemed McGhee Tyson Airport outside Knoxville worthy of the country's most reliable airport with over 85% of flights leaving on time in February.

One more ski trip, a flight to Florida?

Thinking about trying to sneak in one last ski trip? AirHelp analysts said that you’d be better off going through Salt Lake City International than Denver because it has fewer flights disrupted.

Flying to the sunny South? The analysts give the nod to Jacksonville and Tampa as Florida’s two best airports, both with under 18% of total flights disrupted. If you’re going to South Florida, however, patience will be necessary.

“If you’re heading to Miami, fly directly to Miami and avoid West Palm or Fort Lauderdale, which canceled a higher percentage of flights than Miami International,” the analysts said.

For reliable travel and warm weather, the best bet is Georgia because both Savannah/Hilton Head (84.15% of flights left on time) and Hartsfield Jackson in Atlanta have reliability of nearly 85% when it comes to flights leaving on time.

Should you fly stand-by if you think a flight departure is risky?

Flight cancellations and delays can domino like crazy! If your flight gets canceled, then you and the umpteen others on that flight will be rebooked on another flight, but that other flight also has people already on it so the airline has to figure out a way to fit both groups of fliers on the same flight. If there's more than one delay or cancelation, then that situation multiplies even further. 

Scott Keyes of Going.com suggests flying standby on an earlier flight if one’s available. Keyes told ConsumerAffairs that it’s pretty much a slam dunk if there's space on the flight, you already have a ticket for a flight, and you’re trying to get on an earlier one. 

The only thing that you’ll have to work out with the airline is if there’s space available in the same fare class as your already existing flight. It’s possible that if there’s a fare discrepancy you’ll have to pay extra to sit in Business or First, but that’s an airline-to-airline matter and one you’ll have to deal with and decide whether it’s worth the extra money in those situations. 

Revisiting new changes for families and delayed/canceled flights

Don’t forget – the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) has made some changes to what airlines must do in cases where families are flying together and flights are either canceled or delayed.

To get current with what those changes are and what airlines are required to do and at what point, all you need to do is visit the DOT’s special travel dashboard available here.

For the next few weeks, airports are going to be bustling with travelers trying to get to their spring break destinations, but AirHelp, an air passenger ri...

Article Image

What airlines take care of its customers the best? The new scorecard is in and it’s not pretty for some U.S. airlines.

The latest Air Travel Consumer Report is out and it shows that airlines have their work cut out for them if they want to please their passengers. On-time arrivals and departure, luggage, and flight cancelations appear to be issues.

Airlines have work to do… lots

Overall, there’s some serious work to be done. Complaints were up more than double from the latest report vs. a year ago. The biggest complaint categories shake out like this:

  1. Refunds -- about 30% of all complaints

  2. Flight problems (delays, etc.) 

  3. Baggage 

  4. Fares 

  5. Reservations

Here are some highlights ConsumerAffairs found interesting:

On-time arrivals. Getting somewhere on-time is crucial and must be on the lips of every Delta pilot in that airline’s workforce. Its percentage of on-time arrivals was a domestic airline best at 85.5%. United was second at 83.9% and Southwest* was third at 81%. Bringing up the rear was Frontier with its flights landing when they were supposed to 64.6% of the time. *It's important to note that these reports lag by a couple of months and Southwest’s holiday troubles were not included.

Baggage woes continue to grow. If you’ve flown lately, you’ve noticed that more and more travelers are bringing their bags with them in the cabin. They have a good reason, too. The report shows that the number of baggage-related complaints the Department of Transportation has received has quadrupled in the last year. 

When it came to “mishandled baggage” per 100 people on a flight, it was American at 0.76 bags per 100, then Alaska (.62), and JetBlue (.58). Allegiant had the fewest number of “mishandled baggage” complaints per 100 fliers with 0.15.

Sorry, you’re not getting on. When it comes to who’s not getting on a flight – “involuntary,” “denied boardings” – American, Southwest, and Frontier have some explaining to do. Each of those carriers drew complaints more than 1,000 times between July and September ‘22, with Frontier complaints jumping 64%, Southwest complaints jumping 57%, and American complaints 35% from the same period in ‘21.

One truly amazing metric was how Delta and Allegiant fared on the good side of the “involuntary,” “denied boarding” scoreboard. Out of 34,955,144 flights Delta put up during the period tracked, the airline suffered zero complaints regarding being denied boarding; and while Allegiant only put 397 flights in the air, it still had zero complaints, too.

Refund? What refund? When it came to problems in obtaining refunds for unused or lost tickets, fare adjustments, or bankruptcies, Frontier (236), American (146), and United (107) scored the most complaints. With the added effort American has put toward improving consumer perception about refunds, it probably hopes this is the last time it shows up near the top of this category.

“Not fair” fares! The report showed that when it came to fare issues such as discount fare conditions, Frontier scored the most complaints (104) among the major U.S. carriers, more than double what Spirit received (40), and about triple what American did (35). Delta Air Lines received 30 complaints about fare issues and Southwest 10.

The latest Air Travel Consumer Report is out and it shows that airlines have their work cut out for them if they want to please their passengers. On-time a...

Article Image

After the great holiday airline Christmas calamities, one travel blogger says Americans should consider RVs as an option.

Because of the airline industry’s holiday collapse, some wannabe travelers might be thinking of other options to get to their vacation destination. Bus? Train? Renting a car? RV?

On the surface, they all seem expensive and, in fact, can be. But one travel blogger who went the RV route insists that when gas, accommodations, meals, etc. are figured into the equation, renting an RV may offer more upside than most people realize.

“This topic of airline travel fees vs the cost of an RV road trip came up after I, along with many others, experienced the stress, panic, and cost of travel this past holiday,” Megan Meade told ConsumerAffairs.”

“After our flights to and from the Midwest were canceled the night before we had to leave, our plan of catching a cheap flight turned into a hectic rescheduling for some much more expensive tickets and the loss of a day on our trip. This got me thinking, how much would it have cost us to just take our RV and make a road trip out of it?”

Meade said that thanks to some online tools like the U.S. government’s fuel trip calculator and tips from blogs on calculating the price of an RV road trip, she was able to get a good idea of just how much her 1,200-mile trip from the east coast to the Midwest would set her back. She said she took everything she could into account, including a one-night stop at a campground each way, a high-end estimate on the price of gas, and tolls. 

When it was all added up, Meade said that while the estimated cost of gas seemed off the chart – like $840 – everything added together was about the cost of one to one-and-a-half airline tickets. 

And Fido rides free!

One plus that Meade brought to our attention is that she was able to avoid the cost of boarding – or shipping – her dog.

That factor alone saved her around $350, making the savings for this trip far more considerable, she said.

“In total, the cost of an RV road trip would have cost in the ballpark of $1,000-$1,200. This is $600 less than what it cost us to fly, including the additional expense to leave our pup behind,” was her takeaway.

“These savings alone are enough to make me strongly reconsider flying for our next trip, but one day when kids are added to the mix, we will definitely be skipping the stress of airline travel and embracing the life-long memories that come with family road trips whenever possible.”

RV parks are all-in on upgrades, too

Meade apparently isn’t alone in using an RV for her vacation transportation. All told, more than 70 million Americans did the same in 2022, 10 million more than they did in COVID-heavy 2021.

To meet the rush, campground owners are finding they need to up their game, too, if they want to stay in business. On top of natural add-ins like wi-fi, sustainability, and environmental impact to meet the expectations of the younger, more diverse traveler, Steve Mwan at RVPlusYou says campground owners are being nudged to find unique overnight options that might appeal to demographics who’ve written off  RVing as old-fogey stuff.

“For the road-weary traveler who has spent too many nights in a cramped RV, onsite lodging can be a welcome relief. Getting creative with your accommodations is a clever way to appeal to a wider range of campers,” Mwan said.

“People are increasingly interested in unique or unusual accommodations, so you can add options such as cabins, yurts, teepees, tree houses, or vintage trailers. You can even include bio-domes or hammocks for those who want to soak in the stars.”

Because of the airline industry’s holiday collapse, some wannabe travelers might be thinking of other options to get to their vacation destination. Bus? Tr...

Article Image

United Airlines announces efforts to make it easier for families to sit together

Just in time for Spring Break travels, United Airlines announced its new system that will allow families to book seats next to each other for no additional cost. 

The new process is geared toward families with children under the age of 12 years old. Travelers will now be able to book adjoining seats for themselves and their young children without paying extra. 

“In an era where more families are working in a hybrid environment, they’re traveling more often – and they’re flying United,” said Linda Jojo, chief customer officer for United. “We’re focused on delivering a great experience for our younger passengers and their parents and know it often starts with the right seat. We look forward to rolling out more family-friendly features this year.” 

Updated seat maps will help families sit together

With this update, fliers will be automatically directed to a new seat map that will highlight seats that are next to each other. This will make it easier for parents to see where there are openings and where they’ll be able to sit with their kids. 

The new policy will also give travelers options when adjoining seats aren’t available. When traveling with kids on a flight that is full or when an aircraft gets changed, consumers will have the opportunity to switch their flight – at no cost – to get seats that are next to each other. 

The goal of this new system is for parents to avoid having to ask flight attendants or their fellow travelers to switch seats so their children can be next to them. 

Additionally, parents won’t have to worry about getting randomly assigned seats. The new policy will be available for travelers who purchase Basic Economy seats – a tier where seats are usually not assigned until fliers check in or get to their gates. 

There are a few tiers of tickets that won’t fall under this new policy, including: Economy Plus, United Polaris, and United First Class. 

United will begin rolling out these updates immediately, and all travelers will have access to them starting in the first week of March. 

Just in time for Spring Break travels, United Airlines announced its new system that will allow families to book seats next to each other for no additional...

Article Image

Southwest announces new flights through October 2023

Southwest Airlines, under fire after its widespread holiday cancellation issues, is turning a page and announcing new flights that are scheduled to run through nearly the end of the year. 

Southwest released its entire schedule through October 4, 2023, and also announced new flights, as well as flights that will become available throughout the year from some of the biggest markets across the country. 

What can fliers expect? 

One of the biggest announcements is the expansion of flights from Long Beach, California, to other destinations across the country – without layovers. These are the anticipated adjustments: 

  • Beginning March 9: daily nonstop service between Long Beach and Kansas City 

  • Beginning July 11: daily nonstop service between Long Beach and Colorado Springs and El Paso 

  • Beginning July 15: Saturday nonstop service between Long Beach and Orlando

  • Beginning September 5: daily nonstop service between Long Beach and Albuquerque 

The expansion comes after much demand from customers to offer more direct flights from Long Beach to other major cities within the U.S. 

Later in the year, fliers can expect the addition of more nonstop flights from various markets across the country. Many of these will be seasonal weekend flights while others will run on a daily basis. 

Some of these include: 

  • Beginning September 5: daily nonstop service between Baltimore/Washington International Airport and Oakland 

  • Beginning September 5: daily nonstop service between Las Vegas and Little Rock 

  • Beginning September 9: nonstop weekend service between Dallas and Philadelphia 

  • Beginning September 9: nonstop weekend service between Los Angeles and Portland

  • Beginning September 10: nonstop Sunday service between Boston and Houston 

More of the updated routes for the remainder of the year can be found here. 

Southwest Airlines, under fire after its widespread holiday cancellation issues, is turning a page and announcing new flights that are scheduled to run thr...

Article Image

How airlines approach things like cancellations from the latest winter storms gets Congress’ attention

Airlines have been served notice that what happened with the great Southwest Night Before Christmas meltdown can’t happen again.

Senators Richard Blumenthal (D-CT) and Edward Markey (D-MA) have introduced two new bills – the Airline Passengers’ Bill of Rights and the Forbidding Airlines from Imposing Ridiculous (FAIR) Fees Act – imploring Congress to set things right once and for all.

“Airlines need to be given some incentives to do the right thing and consumers need protection,” said Blumenthal, calling the expenses and hardship from recent delays and cancellations, “just one example of what happens every day to many consumers across the country because they have no bill of rights right now.”

In Blumenthal's mind, this couldn’t be simpler – or more bipartisan. To him, this Bill of Rights provides practical, tangible guarantees that would ensure airlines provide passengers with fair compensation, refunds, and recourse in the event of airline-caused flight delays and cancellations. 

“If Southwest faced these kinds of potential penalties and consumer class action, it might have updated its IT system," Blumenthal said. "It might have revised its point-to-point travel system. And it would have done the right thing voluntarily rather than incur these humongous disruptions and expenses to its consumer. There’s nothing Republican or Democrat about being stranded in an airport.”

The latest winter storm showed that airlines are being more responsive already

As anyone who's observed part of this week’s news cycle knows, winter storm Mara that blasted the South, canceling thousands of flights and sending airlines that fly Southern U.S. routes into we-can't-let-what-happened-to-Southwest-happen-to-us mode. 

Southwest to its credit responded quickly issuing weather waivers that allowed passengers to reschedule their flights at no cost. American did the same.

New expert suggestions on what stranded passengers can do

Mother Nature doesn’t always broadcast her intentions, but it’s evident she hasn’t been happy lately. According to new numbers from the Bureau of Transportation Statistics, 20.12% (144,515) of all flights in the U.S. were delayed in 2022, up from 16% (86,307) in 2021 – a huge swing that impacted more than 60,000 flights and all the travelers who planned to be on board those flights.

United Airlines' CEO has already sent up a flare, warning that more disruptions are ahead. Until all of this is resolved, however, travelers don't have that many good options.  

For any hesitant traveler, the standard issue rules of the road (er, sky) still apply – fly nonstop and use only carry-on bags. ConsumerAffairs found a couple of additional new tricks that might help travelers out if a cancellation happens to them.

Clint Henderson at ThePointsGuy recommends that those who have to check bags should use Apple AirTags in their luggage. However, AirTags only work with Apple iPhones, leaving Android users out in the cold – to a degree.

Android users could always use something like PingTag which would allow airlines (or other kind souls) to scan a QR code sticker on a bag and send a message directly to the flier. 

Henderson also recommends that before heading out, check your credit card benefits.

“Your credit card may cover any extra expenses you incur during long delays or cancellations,” he said.

Blake Walsh, travel expert at Travel Lens added that because getting through to an airline’s customer service department can take forever, stranded travelers should use social media to their advantage.

“Sadly, not all customer service teams are as helpful as they should be and getting in touch with them via a phone call isn’t always easy,” he told ConsumerAffairs.

“Airlines value their reputation on social media and platforms like Twitter are a great way to get in contact with an employee. If you do use Twitter to reach out, then it’s important to remain polite and calm as this will work in your favor.”

Airlines have been served notice that what happened with the great Southwest Night Before Christmas meltdown can’t happen again.Senators Richard Blumen...

Article Image

'Sorry, but your flight is canceled due to weather conditions.' Experts say don’t be so quick to accept that excuse.

Is blaming the weather for a flight cancelation too easy for an airline to use as an excuse? Some aviation pundits claim it might be.

During the pandemic, airlines were called out for using weather as an excuse when there was likely a pilot shortage.

However, in the aftermath of Southwest Airlines' recent implosion and with winter not even halfway through its yearly dance, travelers should know how to interpret what an airline really means when it takes a scheduled flight off the board for weather-related reasons.

Southwest agents did try the weather excuse as a reason to deny covering costs for stranded passengers, airline travel expert Gary Leff writes at A View from the Wing, but the cop-out didn’t stick with passengers or the Department of Transportation (DOT) and the airline’s hand was forced to cover any reasonable hotel and alternate transportation expenses passengers were facing.

What airlines are being forced to face now

Leff said that Southwest’s switcheroo has shifted rhetoric in the travel industry over what consumers are owed – and when. As proof, just take a look at the recent CNBC interview with American Airlines CEO Robert Isom where he went on record saying that when a delay or cancelation is the fault of American “we owe the customers.”

“That is likely news to American’s Customer Relations team,” Leff said. “If you send in a request for compensation due to a delay that the carrier stretches to call ‘weather-related’, respond with this clip from their boss’s boss’s boss saying ‘not so fast, when you don’t recover your operation Robert Isom says you owe your customers!’”

ConsumerAffairs reached out to American for comment but did not hear back from the company immediately.

"Squishy," is how another airline expert puts the industry’s definition of weather.

"The definition of weather has expanded a bit," Meara McLaughlin, vice president of business development for flight data site FlightStats.com, told Frommers. 

"It isn't just the conditions at your airport, along the way, or at your destination that count, but weather anywhere in the system that can be invoked. That's because the airlines' so-called ‘hub and spoke’ system relies on aircraft coming from other cities, which could be affected by weather. To my way of thinking, you have to call that something other than weather," she said.

How travelers can avoid 'weather-related' problems

In seasons where weather is iffy – like winter and tornadoes/hurricanes – it’s typical for a major airline to issue weather waivers in advance so travelers have an opportunity to make changes in advance, frequently without having to pay a change fee.

For example, when United Airlines saw nasty forecasts for weather across the Rockies and the Plains, it gave travelers the wherewithal to make changes at no cost. ThriftyTraveler has a list of what waivers other airlines offer, too.

But if all goes to hell in a handbasket and you find yourself at the airport across the counter from an airline agent who’s telling you that your flight is canceled because of weather, you apparently have rights, but getting something satisfactory might take some doing.

“Here in the U.S., travelers have shockingly few rights,” ThriftyTraveler’s Kyle Potter said. “Really, there's just this one: If your airline cancels your flight, you can cancel your reservation and get a full refund – not just a voucher or credit that expires in a year, but your money back. And that includes when weather is the cause of the disruption.”

If the agent is trying to save their hide and their airline the cost of a refund, they might try and rebook you on the next available flight, Potter said. The problem there is that the “next available flight” could be hours – or days – away. Still, “this law means you've got the option to cancel the reservation altogether and get your money back.”

At that point, travelers need to have a serious talk with themselves because a knee-jerk decision could cause the problem to snowball.

“Of course, that means you'd have to scrap your entire trip and try again another time. At the very least, if you decide to call it quits on your trip, make sure to request a full refund – don't just settle for a travel voucher,” Potter said.

Is blaming the weather for a flight cancelation too easy for an airline to use as an excuse? Some aviation pundits claim it might be.During the pandemi...

Article Image

First, Southwest Airlines’ meltdown. Now, the FAA has one, too? What’s next?

Travelers woke up Wednesday morning to a flood of cancellations caused by an overnight outage of the Federal Aviation Administration's (FAA) Notice to Air Missions system that provides safety info to flight crews.

By 9 am, FlightAware data listed  4,314 total delays within, into, or out of the United States today. The airport hit the hardest was Baltimore/Washington Intl (BWI) where 41% of the flights were delayed.

Southwest, still reeling from its Christmas holiday meltdown, was also hit heavily. Three Southwest hubs – Chicago Midway (37%), Houston Hobby and Dallas Love (31% each) -- were right behind BWI in delays.

By mid-morning, the FAA was able to get things under control and lift its pause on departures. But, on the heels of the Southwest debacle, the question experts are asking is this: does this point to a fragility of the nation's commercial aviation system, which faces heavier demands as air travel demand increases?

“We continue to look into the cause of the initial problem,” the agency tweeted at 8:50 a.m.

Hello, airlines… hello, Pete!

Yaniv Hakim, CEO and co-founder of CommBox, a company that provides digital customer communications platform to airlines told ConsumerAffairs, “The FAA system failure, like the Southwest Airlines fiasco, shows how important it is that every airline will offer their passengers digital services on messaging channels, and provide both human and virtual AI-powered assistance.”

“Airlines need to step it up and offer communication and self-service tasks such as rebooking or canceling flights to their customers in the easiest way possible, not just through websites and apps.”

Hakim said that instead of customers taking to social media to complain about airlines or waiting for hours on hold, they should be able to quickly and easily take care of their concerns through channels like social media messaging, SMS texting, and WhatsApp. 

“When a traveler is stressed and stranded at an airport, especially during a major disruption - whether human, technical or natural - the last thing they want to do is wait on hold, download an app or listen to irrelevant options from an [interactive voice response] system."

In an email to ConsumerAffairs, the Ranking Member of the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure Rick Larsen (D-WA) wasted no time saying that he’s already gotten into Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg’s ear about the issue.

"I spoke with Secretary Buttigieg about this development and will continue to monitor this disruption to our air travel system until it is resolved."

Travelers woke up Wednesday morning to a flood of cancellations caused by an overnight outage of the Federal Aviation Administration's (FAA) Notice to Air...

Article Image

Delta beats the competition to the punch on offering free Wi-Fi

If there ever was a shout-from-the-mountaintops by consumers, all one needs to do is look at the massive fallout from Southwest’s recent meltdown.

That fact is not lost on Delta Air Lines. On Thursday, CEO Ed Bastian said at this year’s CES conference that the airline will follow through with its promise to make in-flight Wi-Fi free for everyone aboard starting this February. 

“It is going to be free, it is going to be fast, and it is going to be available to everyone,” Bastian said. All a traveler has to do to access the service is login to their SkyMiles account -- and they can connect as many devices as they want, too. 

But…

There has to be at least one “but,” doesn’t there? Delta said that the Wi-Fi rollout will only be available on its aircraft that are equipped with a new system built by satellite internet provider Viasat. So far, about 80% of Delta’s domestic fleet is equipped with Viasat and the company’s goal is to have the service installed on 700 aircraft by the end of 2023 and on all of its flights by the end of 2024.

Will others follow suit?

No other airline played their “me, too” card in response to Delta’s announcement. But since Viasat has systems already in place on JetBlue, United, and American, those carriers might consider dropping their internet fee ($14/day on American) so they don’t lose any business to Delta.

If there ever was a shout-from-the-mountaintops by consumers, all one needs to do is look at the massive fallout from Southwest’s recent meltdown.That...

Article Image

Southwest Airlines cancels thousands of flights, leaving travelers in the lurch

“I have been a satisfied Southwest customer for years until experiencing the utter chaos that was Southwest over the holiday weekend,” Rhonda, of Fair Oaks, Calif., wrote in a ConsumerAffairs review when her flight was canceled with little notice.

Rhonda told us Southwest waited until the very last minute to notify travelers that their flights were being taken off the board, causing a domino effect of stranded passengers and unattended piles of luggage she said had been “heaved” all around the airport.

“I feel traumatized by the whole experience and I will definitely think twice about flying again!” she said.

But she’s not alone, nor will she be over the next few days. On Tuesday, Southwest canceled 2,570 flights according to FlightAware and has already canceled another 2,477 for Wednesday, and 917 on Thursday.

What to do

So, what is Rhonda to do? In an email to ConsumerAffairs, a Southwest spokesperson said that “when a carrier-controlled delay is a factor, …we already do other-airline rebooking when Southwest is not an option.”

Unfortunately for many fliers, Southwest flies out of secondary airports where it’s the only airline, leaving no other airline to easily put stranded passengers. In situations like that, a passenger would endure the hassle of taking a cab across town like they would have to in Dallas to go from Love Field where Southwest is the only airline to DFW that all the other major carriers serve. 

But if you take a look at the weather forecast, things could get worse. Southwest has already said that its short-term plans are to operate a third of its schedule “for the next several days,” hopefully to get some breathing room. However, without a complete reset of the carrier’s dominoes, it’s tempting fate if the New Year’s surge creates another round of chaos as travelers try to return home Sunday and Monday.

Hogwash, says a consumer watchdog

In response, U.S. PIRG Consumer Watchdog Teresa Murray said: "Unreliable airline travel has been an ongoing nightmare for more than two and a half years and now caused anguish for so many families looking forward to gathering for the first time since 2019 before the pandemic started. The tales of passengers who spent the holiday weekend sleeping on the floor at an airport are heartbreaking.”

“While the awful weather isn’t anyone’s fault, the way travelers were treated and accommodated – or not – sits squarely on the shoulders of most of the airlines,” Murray said in a statement to ConsumerAffairs.

Among the stranded? How to get help.

In a statement, Southwest said it would offer affected passengers either a refund or a voucher with no expiration date. Murray emphasized that passengers should not take their rights lightly nor should they take the first thing an airline offers them.

“If they choose to accept a credit or voucher, it’s important to understand how they work at each of the 10 largest domestic airlines,” she said.

What exactly are your rights if your flight is canceled? The U.S. Department of Transportation spells it out this way:

  • If your flight is canceled, most airlines will rebook you for free on their next flight to your destination as long as the flight has available seats.
  • If your flight is canceled and you choose to cancel your trip as a result, you are entitled to a refund for the unused transportation – even for non-refundable tickets.  You are also entitled to a refund for any bag fee that you paid, and any extras you may have purchased, such as a seat assignment.  
  •  If the airline offers you a voucher for future travel instead of a refund, you should ask the airline about any restrictions that may apply, such as blackout and expiration dates, advanced booking requirements, and limits on number of seats.

The second point is important. You do not have to accept the alternative travel and if you cancel your plans you are due a refund -- not a voucher for future travel, but a refund.

The DOT recently issued a strong rebuke and large fine for Frontier Airlines on that very point.

And if all else fails, filing a complaint with the DOT has been known to get an airline’s attention.

“I have been a satisfied Southwest customer for years until experiencing the utter chaos that was Southwest over the holiday weekend,” Rhonda, of Fair Oaks...

Article Image

The air travel experience was less bad in September

Just ahead of the holiday travel crush, things seemed to be getting better for airline travelers. But the latest Air Travel Consumer Report shows there's still a long way to go.

According to the Transportation Department, consumer complaints about everything from on-time peformance to lost baggage fell 15.6% from August to September – the latest month for which there are data.

At the same time, though, complaints are more than 380% above pre-pandemic levels.

Arrivals and Departures

Getting where you're going on time showed improvement in September, with carriers reporting an on-time arrival rate of 82.1%, compared with 75.6% in August. However, the rate in the pre-pandemic month of September 2019 was 84.1%.

Airlines posting the best on-time rates were Delta, United and Alaska. The lowest were JetBlue, Frontier and Allegiant.

Probably among the most irritating experiences a traveler has is sitting on the runway waiting to depart.

In September 2022, there were 13 tarmac delays of more than three hours on domestic flights, a big improvement over the 72 reported in August. There was just one delay of more than four hours on international flights, versus five tarmac delays reported in August.

Where's my suitcase?

Carriers handled 37 million bags in September with a mishandled baggage rate of 0.48%. That's a lower rate than a month earlier and on par with the pre-pandemic September 2019 rate of 0.47%.

The mishandled baggage rate for the third quarter was 0.61%, slightly higher than in the July – September period of 20019, befor the pandemic hit.

Other areas covered by the report include bumping oversales, treatment of disabled passengers and discrimnation, which may be found here.

Just ahead of the holiday travel crush, things seemed to be getting better for airline travelers. But the latest Air Travel Consumer Report shows there's s...

Article Image

Guns, long lines, unwrapped gifts? Are you prepared for the changes going through TSA checkpoints?

If you’re flying somewhere over the holidays, the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) says you should be prepared for changes going through security. And, you should be prepared for more fellow travelers than you’ve seen since before the pandemic.

“We are prepared for the increased volume and expect to meet our wait time standards of 30 minutes or less in standard lanes and 10 minutes or less in TSA PreCheck lanes. However, there may be some situations where the capacity of a checkpoint is exceeded,” said TSA Administrator David Pekoske. 

ConsumerAffairs went through the TSA’s laundry list of suggestions and found some things that travelers might not be aware of.

Flying on Thursday, Dec. 22 or Friday, Dec. 30

If you’re going anywhere on Dec. 22 or Dec. 30, get to the airport early and be prepared for crowds. Those days may be among the most hectic of the holidays. Plenty of patience may be required. 

Trying to get a gun through security could cost you dearly

Travelers and firearms have become a major pain point for the TSA. This year, TSA officers intercepted a record 6,301 firearms – more than 88% of those were loaded. Passengers who attempt to bring a firearm through a checkpoint can expect to receive a fine up to $15,000, plus they’ll lose eligibility for TSA PreCheck, and local law enforcement will be called in.

In addition to firearms, there are other items not permitted at the checkpoint. These include explosives, flammables, knives, razors and replica weapons. To see if an item is prohibited, check the TSA website under “What Can I Bring?” 

But, if you baked a cake for Aunt Annie, you can bring that along. As always, passengers may bring solid foods such as cakes and other baked goods through the TSA checkpoint.

Make sure gifts are unwrapped

You’ve already wrapped the gifts you’re taking? Sorry. TSA says you might have to unwrap those – especially ones with lids – so they can inspect those items if they’re curious about the contents. Instead, the agency prefers travelers place their unwrapped gifts in their checked bags as opposed to carry-ons.

Is your ID 'acceptable'?

ID requirements have changed a bit, as have how to show your ID. At many airport checkpoints, a security officer may ask you to insert your physical ID into one of the agency’s new Credential Authentication Technology units. 

There’s a special new perk for people who live in Arizona, Colorado, and Maryland when it comes to showing their IDs. They can use their Apple mobile device to store their ID in Apple Wallet and use their mobile device in certain TSA PreCheck lanes at participating airports.

Ask for help – in advance

If you’re traveling with someone who is disabled or has a particular medical condition, you should contact the TSA Cares helpline at 855-787-2227 at least 72 hours prior to travel. TSA Cares can help with any questions about screening procedures, help you find out what to expect at the security checkpoint, and even arrange for assistance at the checkpoint for travelers with specific needs.

Since most of us have taken to texting, the TSA has, too. If you have questions that you want quickly answered, you can get assistance in real time by submitting your questions and comments to @AskTSA on Twitter, Facebook Messenger and via text message using any mobile device to “AskTSA” (275-872). 

As a word of caution – when ConsumerAffairs tried out the text option, we found out that you need to use simple, short phrases such as “damaged passport.” Asking a question got us nowhere and you’re likely to experience the same

If you’re flying somewhere over the holidays, the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) says you should be prepared for changes going through securi...

Article Image

How early do you need to get to the airport for holiday travel? A new survey breaks it down

During the holidays, many consumers flock to airports around the country to celebrate with their friends and family. However, this time of year usually means more crowds at TSA security checkpoints, more stress, and more uncertainty about making it to the airport on time. 

To help give holiday travelers some insight into when to get to the airport, Upgraded Points conducted a survey to determine when consumers should arrive at the airport to ensure they don’t miss their flights. The survey covers 50 airports across the U.S. and even features a list of the top 15 airports in the country where arriving early is imperative. 

“Preplanning is always key to a smooth travel experience,” said Alex Miller, founder of Upgraded Points. “But as we all know, things happen when it comes to travel – especially around the holidays. By knowing which airports are busier and why you can pre-plan for any delays and ensure your timing sets you up for success.” 

Time is of the essence in these 15 airports

Fifty of the largest airports across the country were included in this study, and they were ranked based on 15 criteria: number of enplanements, number of passengers, airport size, average TSA wait time, number of terminals, number of gates, number of airport employees (per square mile), number of airport lounges (per square mile), number of restaurants/bars (per square mile), number of shops (per square mile), number of parking lots/decks, percentage of on-time departures, percentage of delayed departures, car traffic volume, and car traffic index. 

Each factor was given a weighted score, and airports with the highest scores were those where travelers needed to arrive earlier. The survey ultimately narrowed down the top 15 airports where arriving early was critical:  

  • O’Hare International Airport (Chicago, IL)

  • Los Angeles International Airport (Los Angeles, CA)

  • John F. Kennedy International Airport (Queens, NY)

  • George Bush Intercontinental Airport (Houston, TX) 

  • Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport (Dallas/Fort Worth, TX)

  • Miami International Airport (Miami, FL)

  • San Francisco International Airport (San Francisco, CA) 

  • Charlotte Douglas International Airport (Charlotte, NC) 

  • Philadelphia International Airport (Philadelphia, PA)

  • Newark Liberty International Airport (Newark, NJ)

  • Seattle-Tacoma International Airport (Seattle, WA)

  • Orlando International Airport (Orlando, FL) 

  • Boston Logan International Airport (Boston, MA) 

  • Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta International Airport (Atlanta, GA) 

  • Denver International Airport (Denver, CO)

Based on the survey, Chicago’s O’Hare is the most important airport to get to early. The results recommend travelers get there three hours and four minutes before their flights are scheduled to take off. On the other end of the spectrum is John Glenn Columbus International Airport, which requires travelers to get there just one hour before departure. 

What contributes to slowdowns? 

There are several factors that contribute to slowdowns in these major airports – and that put travelers in jeopardy of missing their flights. Everything from airport staff, TSA wait times, the total acreage of the airport, the number of gates in an airport, and even the number of restaurants or bars in an airport make it harder to be on time for a flight.

The survey showed that the number of employees in all of O’Hare International Airport is nearly 10% lower than the national average. On top of that, the airport has nearly 200 gates and welcomes tens of millions of passengers a year. 

Overall, to help ease some of the stress of traveling during the holidays, experts recommend giving yourself plenty of time at the airport – especially in some of the biggest, most populated areas. 

During the holidays, many consumers flock to airports around the country to celebrate with their friends and family. However, this time of year usually mea...

Article Image

Here are the airlines and airports that treat customers the best -- and worst

Ask anyone what the most important considerations are when they travel and they’ll tell you customer care. One bad experience with an airline could taint that company’s relationship with a person forever. 

To demonstrate which carriers cater to consumers with all their love and which ones don't, all one needs to do is look at air passenger rights experts AirHelp's 7th annual ranking of best service, fly on time, and treatment of passengers if and when problems occur.

To calculate the scores, AirHelp uses its own database of flight statistics, thousands of customer poll responses and its own experience in helping 1.3 million passengers around the world receive compensation following flight disruption.

The winners

While a few U.S. airlines fared well, international carriers and airports left most of their U.S. peers at the gate. Qatar Airways, United Airlines, Qantas, Etihad Airways, and South America’s LATAM Airlines were rated highest among carriers worldwide.

As far as airports are concerned, AirHelp found Tokyo Haneda International Airport, Recife/Guararapes-Gilberto Freyre International Airport in Brazil, and Tokyo Narita International Airport to be the best global airports for 2022. 

In addition to its second place finish worldwide, United Airlines was also ranked as number one in the U.S., followed by American, and Delta finishing 8th and 19th respectively. As for airports stateside, Houston George Bush Intercontinental Airport in Houston was the highest-scoring airport. 

When you break that down to individual metrics of claim handling, on-time performance, and customer satisfaction among domestic airlines, Delta ranked first in on-time performance; JetBlue came in number one in customer opinion and United earned the top spot in how effectively claims were handled.

And the losers

Overall among domestic airlines, Spirit, Frontier, and JetBlue came up as the losers in the overall AirHelp Score.

JetBlue took last place in on-time performance; Frontier in customer opinion and Spirit in the claims processive category. Newark Liberty Airport was ranked as the worst both at home and in the world. 

As for the holidays…

In a separate study, Forbes Advisor thought it would be interesting to find where the trouble spots for holiday travelers might be. For that study, researchers analyzed data from the Bureau of Transportation to determine which airports and airlines are the best and worst for holiday travel, specifically considering data from November through January for the 100 busiest airports and eight of the largest airlines. For them, the good and the bad look like this:

Worst airports for holiday travel: Westchester County Airport (HPN) earned the top spot on the list of worst airports for holiday travel, followed by Ted Stevens Anchorage International Airport (ANC) and McGhee Tyson Airport (TYS).

Best airports for holiday travel: Long Beach Airport (LGB) is the best airport for holiday travel, followed by Ellison Onizuka Kona International Airport at Keahole (KOA) and Norman Y. Mineta San Jose International Airport (SJC).

For those who are heading toward sunny California, you’re in luck, Forbes’ analysts said. Six of the top 10 best airports for holiday travel are located in California, including Long Beach Airport (LGB), Norman Y. Mineta San Jose International Airport (SJC), Sacramento International Airport (SMF), Oakland International Airport (OAK), Ontario International Airport (ONT) and Hollywood Burbank Airport (BUR).

Worst airline for holiday travel: JetBlue Airways

Best airline for holiday travel: Alaska Airlines 

Ask anyone what the most important considerations are when they travel and they’ll tell you customer care. One bad experience with an airline could taint t...

Article Image

On hold forever when you call an airline? There may be a solution

“Your call is very important to us, but we are experiencing higher-than-normal call volumes.”

If you’ve tried to contact an airline in the past year, you might have that message and it's probably still ringing in your ears, not to mention that crick in your neck from staying on hold for what seem like days.

You’re not alone.

Joe of Hingham, Mass. told ConsumerAffairs in his review of American Airlines that he was on hold with customer service for four hours yesterday only to be told his problem could only be resolved at the airport. 

Cynthia of Northville, Mich. said she had the same experience with Southwest. “After one hr and 47 minutes on hold, I was told that nothing could be done,” but the Southwest representative offered to have someone call me back in “six to eight business days,” Cynthia said.

What can a customer do to get around impossible on-hold times?

"We are experiencing higher than normal call volumes” has become a broken record. But, in truth, it may just mean that "We are experiencing normal call volumes and we are understaffed" – a problem that Delta Air Lines CEO Ed Bastian admitted to last year. And one that he doesn’t like his airline to be associated with.

When Bastian came under fire about the matter during one of the carrier’s earnings calls, he said “Just email me, I’ll take care of it.” By the way, Delta’s email addresses are generally FirstName.LastName@delta.com.

But, what if the airline you’re dealing with doesn’t have someone in charge who boldly puts their email address out there as Bastian does, or you’re forced to use the airline’s app that also ends up as a dead end? Is there a real live human being left in the travel world who you can speak to? Travel expert Wendy Perrin says there is: Call the airline’s customer-service office in a different country.

“Major airlines have overseas locations where staffers speak English—in the U.K., Germany, Australia, Hong Kong, and Singapore, for example—and they are typically just as able to help you as their U.S.-based counterparts, as long as their office is open (not all call centers are open 24 hours) and not dealing with a snowstorm,” she said. Note: If you use your credit card with a customer service agent rep who’s based in another country, a foreign transaction fee may be tacked on.

“So if you need to speak with someone at American Airlines, try calling one of its worldwide phone numbers. To keep the cost of the call down, use WhatsApp, Skype, or Google Voice,” Perrin said.

ConsumerAffairs found that other airlines like United also post international, European, or Asian phone numbers online.

But, fair warning – Delta doesn’t offer that overseas-office option anymore. Airline expert Gary Leff, says there is a workaround though – dial 1-855-548-2505 when you have to travel within 48 hours.

“This is the number that’s printed on the airline’s red ‘Need Help?’ cards and on their ‘Need Help?’ signs at the airport,” he said.

“They’ll only assist with travel needs in the upcoming 48 hours, but it circumvents the waits.”

Let the other guy wait on hold for a change

Perrin credits Leff for turning her onto GetHuman.com – a site devoted to ID’ing customer service phone numbers for nearly every major company you can think of. 

“Its crown jewel is a free, automated callback service that gives you an estimate of the current hold duration, sits on hold for you, and calls you back and connects you when a representative answers. Just search the database for your airline to get started,” Perrin said.

Why not just hire someone to handle this hassle for you instead?

There’s an answer for everything, but is there someone somewhere you could hire to do all the customer service dirty work for you instead? Evidently. Perrin says that CrankyConcierge.com can possibly save the day for a traveler whose flight is canceled or delayed. Emergency help starts at $175. 

If a customer isn’t satisfied that it’s done everything it can to try and help – and the customer has done what they ask in their terms of service – “just ask for a refund of our service fees and you'll get it,” the company says on its site.

“Your call is very important to us, but we are experiencing higher-than-normal call volumes.”If you’ve tried to contact an airline in the past year, yo...

Article Image

Frontier Airlines ordered to pay $222 million in refunds and a $2.2 million penalty

Anyone who’s had a flight canceled or significantly changed in the last year or so is due a refund. The U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) said it’s had enough of airlines not giving mistreated passengers their due, fining Frontier Airlines and five foreign carriers -- Air India, TAP Portugal, Aeromexico, El Al, Avianca -- $7.2 million in penalties and forcing those six to cough up $600 million in refunds to those scorned fliers.

When the DOT mandated that airlines must offer refunds over vouchers for canceled flights during COVID-19 outbreak, Frontier played the victim card and refused, taking the issue to court where a Federal judge let the company off the hook.

“When a flight gets canceled, passengers seeking refunds should be paid back promptly. Whenever that doesn’t happen, we will act to hold airlines accountable on behalf of American travelers and get passengers their money back,” said U.S. Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg. “A flight cancellation is frustrating enough, and you shouldn’t also have to haggle or wait months to get your refund.” 

With those fines, the department’s Office of Aviation Consumer Protection has assessed $8.1 million in civil penalties in 2022, the largest amount ever issued in a single year by that office. 

So, will this refund refusal stop now?

Under U.S. law, airlines and ticket agents are legally obligated to refund anyone holding a ticket if the airline cancels or significantly changes a flight to, from, and within the United States, if the passenger does not wish to accept the alternative offer, which is usually a voucher. The DOT says it is unlawful for an airline to refuse refunds and instead provide vouchers to such consumers.  

Locking down price transparency – especially for those fees airlines have for nearly everything – is the next major move consumers can expect from the DOT. 

Under a recently proposed rule, airlines and travel search websites, like Expedia and Travelocity, would have to make it clear as day upfront any fees charged to sit with your child, for changing or canceling your flight, and for checked or carry-on baggage. 

ConsumerAffairs reviewers have had as much of this fee business as they can take. In the last year, nearly 90 consumers have written concerns about Frontier Airlines and its refund policies, and another 30 plus about the same dissatisfaction with Orbitz.

“They have a policy that states they do not give refunds on flights booked within 7 days,” Jon of Los Angeles, wrote. “I booked through Orbitz and Orbitz did not notify me of this.”

It’s about time says consumer watchdog

“It’s great that the DOT is finally demanding some accountability, but  $600 million is a drop in the bucket. Airlines owe some $10 billion in refunds going back to the beginning of the pandemic,” U.S. PIRG Consumer Watchdog Teresa Murray said in response.

“Furthermore, only one U.S.-based airline is in this group. Domestic carriers accepted billions of dollars in taxpayer money to stay afloat during the early months of the pandemic. As travelers know all too well, the industry used the money to offer employees lucrative buyouts and retirement packages, leaving their operations understaffed." 

Anyone who’s had a flight canceled or significantly changed in the last year or so is due a refund. The U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) said it’s h...

Article Image

Flying somewhere over the holidays? Are you ready for all the changes you could encounter?

If this holiday travel season traffic continues to grow in numbers like the rest of 2022 has, travelers who haven’t flown since the pandemic lifted should be ready for changes that they might not have seen before.

Here are some possible wrinkles and ideas that ConsumerAffairs found that may be worth considering. It may be worth printing this out and using it as a guide as you plan out your holiday air travel.

Flights might be packed to the gills. “Flights will all be full so if sitting together with family and friends is important, ensure you have seats reserved,” Sandra McLemore, travel TV host and industry expert told ConsumerAffairs, adding an extra warning that it's unlikely you'll be able to switch on the day of travel without asking another passenger.

AirlineRatings' Geoffrey Thomas said that if you want more comfort, seating-wise, consider buying an exit row. “It is an excellent investment and not only gives more comfort but reduces stress levels,” he said.

Drop off your luggage ahead of time. One of the little known tricks of the trade for seasoned travelers is that you actually check your luggage ahead of time!

“If you're able to do this it can help cut down the amount of time you need to spend in the airport, potentially avoiding some queues. Alternatively, if you can opt just for hand luggage you can reduce any wait times even further,” Laura Lindsay, Skyscanner’s trend and destination expert told ConsumerAffairs. 

For a complete list of airlines that offer this service, click here.

Prepare for delays

Pack a ton of patience for the airport. McLemore says travelers should arrive at the airport 2-3 hours earlier than normal if they don't have TSA and/or CLEAR* membership. Lines will be long, less experienced travelers and people with special needs will take longer to maneuver through the airport.”

*CLEAR is an airport security membership platform that helps passengers get through security faster at these U.S. airports.

Some U.S. airports will be especially busy over the Thanksgiving weekend – among them, Atlanta, Las Vegas, and Charlotte. Hopper offers a list of the 10 busiest airports and the 10 that suffer the most disruptions. You can find that here.

If you can, avoid checking luggage. In her opinion, McLemore thinks that a carry-on offers faster movement and less chance of your items going astray.

However, for those who need to check a bag or are concerned that they could lose or misplace something while traveling, ConsumerAffairs recently found something called PingTag, “lost and found” QR code stickers that can go on things like luggage so if a bag gets lost, anyone who finds it can scan the code and contact the owner.  

App up! Mary DeSpain, President at Destination CLEs told ConsumerAffairs that travelers should be sure to have their airline’s app downloaded. You’ll be able to use it for boarding, baggage tracking, getting immediate updates, etc.

Check-in online. “Checking in online can really save time on arrival at the airport. Online check-in is obligatory for some airlines, but even for airlines where it’s not, it’s usually an option,” Lindsay said.

“If you’ve already checked in online, you can completely avoid the first check-in queue at the airport, going straight to bag drop or security. You’ll also be able to choose your seats in advance, snagging some extra leg room or a window seat before the other passengers get the chance.”

Keep an eye on the sky

Watch for weather changes. Putting on her weathercaster hat, DeSpain added that if a traveler sees bad weather coming, they should call their airline immediately to see if they can make changes to their itinerary.

Travelers can check on whether their flight is on time or stuck somewhere else because of bad weather at FlightAware, ConsumerAffairs go-to site for flight snafus.

Check how long the lines are in advance. “You can always check the airport’s website for information on whether the security lines are longer than usual,” noted Mercedes Zach, a travel expert at ASAP Tickets. “To save time, check in online or at a self-service desk at the airport whenever possible.”

Thomas added that if you’re flying with a low-cost airline, you should consider buying priority check-in and boarding.

“Saves long queues which can be very stressful. At some airports, you can also buy security on departure and customs on arrival priority lanes,” he said. “Worth every cent!”

How to get through security faster. Zach also told ConsumerAffairs that some locations and airlines may still require masks or even proof of vaccination, so it’s smart to take that documentation with you just in case. 

Skyscanner’s Lindsay added to dress for success – in the security line! “You’ll likely have to take off your coat and belt before walking through the security screening, as well as some shoes, like boots or high heels. The more you prepare before passing through security, the faster the process will be,” she said.

Speaking of security checks, are you enrolled in TSA PreCheck?

Having TSA PreCheck can save a lot of time. In fact, during October 2022, 91% of PreCheck holders waited less than 5 minutes.

“We always encourage travelers to enroll in TSA PreCheck to facilitate a more seamless experience,” a spokesperson for Airlines for America told us.

Just so you know, PreCheck comes at a price, but TSA just discounted in-person enrollment and renewals to $78 and online for $70 for 5 years – so that needs to be considered if you don’t plan on flying frequently.

But, lucky you, one airline industry watcher has found seven ways around TSA Pre-Check fees, as well as Clear and Global Entry.

"Currently, there are nearly 50 cobranded airline, hotel, and other credit cards offering up to $100 in statement credit reimbursement for the application fees associated with Global Entry or TSA PreCheck," said ThePointsGuy's Caroline Tanner.

"This credit is typically available every four to five years, though you should check the terms for your specific card for the exact frequency."

Pack your own snacks

Bring some snacks if you want to save money. Airlines are still charging for seemingly everything short of going to the bathroom. Yes, water, coffee, tea, etc. are still free, but you’ll pay dearly if you want some snacks. If you want to save money, bring your own snacks.

The TSA allows travelers to bring everything from bread to yogurt onboard. Some items have to be under a certain size, but with a little advance planning, you could put together some to-go bags for everyone in your group.

Prepare for flights to be delayed or canceled. “Delays and cancellations are a fact of life any holiday season, but we could see more of them than usual this year as airlines adjust their schedules based on demand, and as they struggle to find qualified workers in some cases,” Scott Keyes, founder of Scott’s Cheap Flights told ConsumerAffairs.

“Remember, though, if the airline significantly alters your schedule, you can get a full refund or request that they accommodate you on another flight. It's easier for the larger airlines to do the latter, as they have interline agreements with other airlines,” Keyes added. 

One important thing to note, however, is the airlines that haven’t agreed to rebook a traveler on another airline with which it has an agreement at no additional cost when a cancellation or delay of a flight is “controllable" (maintenance or crew problems, cabin cleaning, baggage loading, and fueling).

According to the Department of Transportation's dashboard, Allegiant, Frontier, Southwest*, and Spirit have yet to agree to that rule and anyone flying on those airlines should be aware of what they can and can’t expect in a delay or cancellation. Airlines for America offers a comprehensive guide on the matter, as well. 

And, if you do get in a jam with a cancellation, there’s AirHelp, a fee-based service that can offer advice to travelers regarding cancellation and other rights.

If this holiday travel season traffic continues to grow in numbers like the rest of 2022 has, travelers who haven’t flown since the pandemic lifted should...

Article Image

Customer satisfaction with airports has hit some turbulence, study finds

Once upon a time flying used to be fun and kind of glamorous, but the pandemic and the airlines' struggle for profitability sucked the life out of the experience. Even though COVID-19 seems like a fading vapor trail, air traveler satisfaction with North American airports can’t seem to get airborne again.

According to the J.D. Power 2022 North America Airport Satisfaction Study, overall satisfaction with airports is down 25 points this year as travelers encounter fewer flights, more crowded terminals, and skimpy food and beverage offerings.

“The combination of pent-up demand for air travel, the nationwide labor shortage, and steadily rising prices on everything from jet fuel to a bottle of water has created a scenario in which airports are extremely crowded and passengers are increasingly frustrated, and it is likely to continue through 2023,” said Michael Taylor, travel intelligence lead at J.D. Power. 

“In some ways, this is a return to normal as larger crowds at airports tend to make travelers more frazzled, but in cases where parking lots are over capacity, gates are standing room only and restaurants and bars are not even open to offer some reprieve, it is clear that increased capacity in airports can’t come soon enough.”

$27.85 for a beer?

The J.D. Power survey takers were the least happy with the inflationary prices they’ve encountered at airports. Nearly one-fourth (24%) of travelers say they did not make any food or beverage purchases at the airport because they were ridiculously expensive and, yes, $27.85 for a beer is a real thing. Food and drink prices at airports are up from 20% in 2021 and 23% in 2019, a far cry from what a traveler would term as reasonable.

Another major moan is that many airports don’t have enough parking spaces. The analysts said that issue is one of the prime reasons traveler satisfaction faltered this year. Satisfaction with surface parking lots declined 45 points from 2021, with 14% of travelers saying parking was more expensive than they expected, up from 12% in 2021 and 11% in 2019.

MSP is best 

Among the “mega” airports, Minneapolis-Saint Paul International Airport (MSP) ranks highest in passenger satisfaction with a score of 800. San Francisco International Airport (796) ranks second while Detroit Metropolitan Wayne County Airport (791) and John F. Kennedy International Airport (791) each rank third in a tie.

For the next size tier – “large” airports – the title goes to Tampa International Airport with a score of 846, followed by John Wayne Airport, Orange County (826), and Dallas Love Field (825).

Indianapolis International Airport ranks highest among medium-size airports with a score of 842. Pittsburgh International Airport (839) ranks second while Jacksonville International Airport and its Sunshine State neighbor, the Southwest Florida International Airport serving the Ft. Myers and southwest Florida areas (826), are tied for third place.

Calmer winds coming

Will things get better? Scott Keyes of ScottsCheapFlights says yes. He told ConsumerAffairs that as airlines get their post-COVID act together, airport chaos is calming down.

“This summer was the wild west of air travel. Mass amounts of cancellations and delays, lines that snaked out of the airport, and thousands of lost bags made air travel fraught with complications and annoyances,” he said.

“Thankfully, as the summer travel rush comes to an end, so has the worst of the chaos. For example, the flight cancellation rate over Memorial Day weekend was 2.2% while over the Labor Day holiday weekend it was just 0.6%.”

Keyes said that anyone traveling over the next month or so should still give themselves a little extra time at the airport, in addition to booking longer layovers, and traveling lighter or taking precautions to avoid a lost bag. Still, one’s chances of encountering major delays are less as fewer people are traveling.

Once upon a time flying used to be fun and kind of glamorous, but the pandemic and the airlines' struggle for profitability sucked the life out of the expe...

Article Image

Flying somewhere soon? Airlines update commitments to passengers when flights are delayed or cancelled

If you’re one of the millions of Americans planning on traveling over Labor Day weekend, you need to ask yourself if you’re ready for anything that could go wrong – canceled flights, lost baggage, etc. And if you are worried, you’re not alone. A new survey from Insuranks found that 71% of those planning to travel this year are worried about those things, too.

In the good news department, there are two things that might give you hope: One, FlightAware lists relatively few cancellations or delays for U.S. based airlines or domestic airports. Two is that the Department of Transportation is full speed ahead on providing travelers a “dashboard” of what types of accommodations that airlines have committed to provide to customers in the event of a delay or cancellation – anything within an airline’s control, such as a mechanical issue. 

With the new dashboard, passengers who are stuck in Scranton or delayed in Des Moines can pull up the new widget and quickly find out what they can expect to happen. The new dashboard is also a good tool for people who are booking flights to see what carriers are offering when things go bad.

What airlines are the most committed and the least committed?

When you first look at the dashboard, the stark contrast between the green checkmarks and the red X’s speaks volumes. Among the U.S. five largest airlines, American, Delta, JetBlue, and United all had checkmarks in every category – every single one of the DOT’s 10 requested commitments, including rebooking passengers on the same airline at no additional cost and complimentary hotel accommodations for any passenger affected by an overnight cancellation.

The two things that the other member of the big five -- Southwest -- didn’t commit to were: rebooking passengers on another airline at no additional cost when a flight was “controllably” canceled or delayed. However, one of those X's apparently has a caveat. A Southwest spokesperson told ConsumerAffairs that it does offer other-airline rebooking when Southwest is not an option.

Other airlines where the red X’s marked the spot included Allegiant, which had yet to say “yes” to any of the DOT’s requested commitments; Frontier was uncommitted on six caveats; Spirit, uncommitted on four; and Hawaiian had an X on one commitment. 

To make sure it covered all the bases, the DOT’s dashboard also provides links to all U.S. airlines' current customer service plans.

Why do Allegiant and Frontier appear uncommitted?

ConsumerAffairs reached out to Allegiant and Frontier to get their side of the story on their red X’s.

Allegiant said it welcomes and supports the DOT’s efforts to give travelers a consumer-friendly platform that catalogs all the U.S. airlines’ policies in one place, but it said that in its current form, the dashboard does not accurately portray all that Allegiant does for its customers in the event of cancellations and schedule changes. An airline spokesperson told ConsumerAffairs that it was in the process of publishing the information from its contract of carriage and expects the dashboard to reflect that when it’s updated next week.  

So, until then, what?

“Allegiant has always gone above and beyond its Customer Service Plan in assisting and providing for its customers when they experience controllable travel disruptions,” the airline said in emailed comments.

What does that mean in layman’s terms? Allegiant’s spokesperson gave the example of when it cancels a flight for a controllable reason, the airline offers customers re-accommodation on other Allegiant flights, or refunds for the affected leg of their trip. 

“Depending on the circumstances and length of delay, we also issue vouchers to use for future travel, as well as extra cash compensation through Paynuver, our online payment distribution platform,” the spokesperson said.

“In many cases, we also provide reimbursement for hotel accommodations and ground transportation expenses incurred due to a controllable flight cancellation.”

Allegiant said that when it comes to a minimum one-hour delay, it will serve customers complimentary non-alcoholic beverages and snacks.

“If a delay stretches to four hours, we provide customers with a meal or meal vouchers. These are all established practices that Allegiant has long used to take care of our customers when a flight is unexpectedly disrupted,” the company said.

In response to the items the DOT listed Frontier uncommitted to, it too has policies in place to accommodate and assist passengers in the event of a travel disruption. As to exactly what a Frontier passenger can expect in the event of a controllable delay or cancellation, here’s what a company spokesperson told ConsumerAffairs: 

“Accommodation on the next available Frontier flight at no additional cost; one night of hotel accommodation if the next available Frontier flight necessitates a hotel overnight; meal vouchers for flight delays of three hours or more or cancellations that result in a rebooking on Frontier that results in a flight departure three hours or more from the originally scheduled flight; or alternatively, if a flight is canceled or delayed in excess of three hours, a full refund of the unused portion of the ticket.”

If you’re one of the millions of Americans planning on traveling over Labor Day weekend, you need to ask yourself if you’re ready for anything that could g...

Article Image

Airfare deals are plentiful this fall, an industry watcher says

Fall flight fares are falling… fast (say that 10 times!). After a spike in airfare prices in the spring, the price to get from point A to point B might be the best it’s been in awhile.

Why is that important to know?

“Because if your sense of what flight prices should be hasn’t been updated since the spring, you’re at risk of overpaying for your next trip,” Scott Keyes at Scott’s Cheap Flights told ConsumerAffairs.

Keyes said that after airfares peaked in late May, airfare fell 3% in June, and 8% in July – the third largest fare drop on record. 

When ConsumerAffairs asked Keyes why fares are falling so quickly, he said that in the airline industry, there’s a rule of thumb about summer travel: flights after Labor Day are 50% cheaper than flights before Labor Day.

The logic there being that as schools resume, the number of travelers slides throughout August and then nosedives after Labor Day. 

“There are still plenty of expensive flights around, but far more cheap flights in the mix now, too,” he said. “In the past few weeks, we’ve seen roundtrip fares from various cities like $161 to Hawaii, $226 to Norway, and $366 to Lisbon—all nonstop. Don’t settle for expensive flights because you haven’t updated your priors on airfare.”

The Goldilocks Window

Keyes said that for people looking for a trip, a key element is what’s known in the airline industry as the “Goldilocks Window.” 

“Though there’s no set time or date that’s always cheapest to book, there’s still a period when cheap fares are most likely to pop up. I call these Goldilocks Windows,” Keyes said.

Examples? “For domestic flights, it’s normally one to three months before your travel dates. For international trips, it’s two to eight months prior. If your trip is during a peak travel period -- Christmas, summer, St. Patrick’s Day in Dublin -- add a couple of months to those windows.”

But if you’re hoping to take a September trip, Keyes said time is wasting because the Goldilocks Window is closing.

“Even if average fares fall further in next month’s inflation report -- as I expect they will! -- that won’t help because waiting means you’d be booking those dreaded, most-expensive type of tickets: last-minute,” he said.

Remember to rebook if fares drop so you can save more

This won’t work if you’re a dyed-in-the-wool non-refundable economy ticket buyer, but if you’re in any other refundable ticket class, Keyes said that if you see a better fare after you’ve already purchased your ticket, you can rebook the same flight and pocket the difference in flight credit.

“For example, I booked a domestic flight not long ago for $300. It was painful, but I had very little flexibility,” he said, adding the next strategic step is this: “A few weeks later, when fares for that flight dropped to $160, I canceled the ticket for $300 in travel credit, used that to repurchase the same flight, and wound up with the same ticket plus $140 in flight vouchers.

Fall flight fares are falling… fast (say that 10 times!). After a spike in airfare prices in the spring, the price to get from point A to point B might be...

Article Image

American Airlines clarifies refund policy after canceling 31,000 flights

After American Airlines’ announcement that it is shaving 31,000 flights off its November schedule, travelers – especially those going somewhere for Thanksgiving – were likely wondering what that meant for them. And that’s a good question. 

To try and find out a little more of how those cuts will impact people holding reservations on American, ConsumerAffairs reached out to the airline to get some clear-cut, actionable information. To its credit, American has a very simple, and direct, answer. 

“Customers whose flights may have changed as a result of future schedule changes will be contacted directly with alternate travel options that get them to their destinations,” the company told ConsumerAffairs. “If a change doesn’t meet a customer’s needs, they can seek a full refund under our standard schedule change policy.”

A return to pre-COVID

Typically, U.S. airlines open their booking window around 330 days in advance. For American, it’s 331 days. But a lot can happen in that span that can throw everything off. 

A spokesperson for American told ConsumerAffairs that, just like its peers, it regularly makes adjustments to its future schedule so its schedule aligns as best as it can with customer demand and set up the types of airplanes it uses, the routes its customers want to fly, etc., so it can corral the resources it has available for the operating conditions it faces. 

In fact, while 31,000 flight cancellations was the headline that grabbed the most attention, American had earlier made adjustments to its September and October schedules. The airline says that travelers can expect schedule changes 100 days in advance, but for only as long as it takes to return to the way schedules were built pre-COVID in 2019.  

“But we still aren't where we need to be. And we have a lot of flying ahead of us still in the summer,” American’s CEO Robert Isom said in the company’s second-quarter earnings call.

“So, we're investing in our operation to ensure we meet our reliability goals and deliver for our customers. We're taking proactive steps to build an additional buffer into our schedule for the rest of the year. As I said a minute ago, we're sizing the airline for the resources we have available and the operating conditions we face, and we'll make other changes as needed.”

After American Airlines’ announcement that it is shaving 31,000 flights off its November schedule, travelers – especially those going somewhere for Thanksg...

Article Image

American Airlines to cut 31,000 flights from its November schedule

American Airlines is trimming 31,000 flights out of its November schedule. According to both CNN and aviation analytics company Cirium, that accounts for 16% of the airlines’ total schedule. American couched the move as being "in line with our approach to network and schedule planning throughout the year."

Breaking down Cirium’s data, the two routes suffering the most cancellations are American’s Boston to Philadelphia route and Chicago O'Hare to Dallas-Fort Worth.

"Preliminary schedules are published 331 days in advance and then adjustments are made closer in based on the schedule we intend to operate," American told CNN in a statement. "We are now loading schedule adjustments approximately 100 days in advance, which is in line with how we adjusted our schedule in 2019 prior to the pandemic."

Do analysts expect more of this?

American Airlines isn’t the only U.S. carrier to have taken an ax to its schedule. Delta, Southwest, and United have all cut flights in the last few months, but a whopping 31,000 cancellations does seem a bit ominous. Should travelers worry? One analyst says his forecast for the airline industry is devoid of dark clouds that would pose any short-term threat.

“Operating challenges, particularly in Europe, the US and Canada, are causing the industry to operate less capacity than the level of passenger demand, supporting strong pricing,” Jonathan Root, Senior Vice President at Moody's Investors Service, told ConsumerAffairs.

Root pointed to staffing shortages as a key factor, not only with pilots and flight attendants but at airports and air traffic control operations. Root says that despite those issues, airlines are in good shape. However, there was one thing he pointed out that might not sit well with budget-conscious travelers.

“Operating less capacity than demand is allowing the airlines to raise ticket prices sufficiently to cover most if not all of their higher costs. We expect capacity to remain below demand even if the long wait times at certain airports this summer cause some travelers to skip additional trips in the near term,” Root said.

American Airlines is trimming 31,000 flights out of its November schedule. According to both CNN and aviation analytics company Cirium, that accounts for 1...

Article Image

DOT to allow disabled fliers to take their own wheelchairs on flights

Thanks to a new plan in the works by the Department of Transportation (DOT), it looks like wheelchair users might get the green light to bring their mobility devices onboard commercial airplanes. A recent feasibility study determined that there were no “formidable issues” preventing the installation of in-cabin wheelchair securement systems in airplanes.

 A DOT spokesperson said the only thing that requires additional testing is determining how a personal wheelchair would match up with the crashworthiness and other pertinent safety requirements of the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). 

There are a considerable number of people who would be positively affected by this change. The recent Portrait of Travelers with Disabilities Mobility & Accessibility study found that among the 75% of respondents who had taken a leisure trip in the last 12 months, disabled travelers had taken an average of 3.4 trips during that time. That's higher than the average number of trips (3.0 trips) taken by nondisabled leisure travelers.

“No other form of transportation – trains, buses, boats – forces you to give up your mobility device when you board,”  U.S. Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg said. “The same ought to be true of airlines. So, in the months and years ahead, we plan to record a new rule that will allow passengers to stay in their personal wheelchairs when they fly. We know this won’t happen overnight, but it is a goal that we have to work to fulfill.”

Earlier this summer, the DOT launched other initiatives focused on disabled travelers. One of them is designed to modernize more than 900 transit stations across the country to make them fully accessible for passenger use; another would require single-aisle aircraft with at least 125 seats to have accessible toilets.

Thanks to a new plan in the works by the Department of Transportation (DOT), it looks like wheelchair users might get the green light to bring their mobili...

Article Image

Southwest Airlines says flight vouchers no longer have an expiration date

Southwest Airlines is saying goodbye to expiration dates on vouchers. In a first-of-its-kind policy shift, the Dallas-based airline says any unexpired Southwest flight credits will be good forever as of July 28, 2022. Vouchers created on or after that date will also be treated the same way.

“The more than 62,000 People at Southwest share a renewed pride in our unmatched access to flexibility that once again reshapes the landscape of Hospitality and value in the industry,” said Southwest Airlines CEO Bob Jordan. 

“Flight credits don’t expire aligns with the boldness of a philosophy to give our Customers definitive simplicity and ease in travel, just like Bags fly free, just like No change fees, just like Points don’t expire — they’re a first-in-our-industry combination of differentiators that only Southwest offers."

In reviewing the fine print of Southwest’s promise, ConsumerAffairs found little that travelers will have to worry about. The only minor note that travelers should be aware of is that flight credits for non-refundable fares will be issued as long as the reservation is canceled more than 10 minutes prior to the scheduled departure.

Airline officials also noted that while the credits are now good “forever,” a customer’s account will show an expiration date of 12/31/2040 until the company's systems are updated. 

Will other airlines follow suit?

Will Southwest’s move create a domino effect in the airline industry? It’s too early to tell, but recent moves made by other carriers suggest that it's a possibility.

When millions of Americans were forced to deal with canceled flights during the pandemic and were issued $10 billion in vouchers, most of those were only good for 12-24 months. That didn’t sit well with Senators Edward Markey (D-MA) and Richard Blumenthal (D-CT), nor members of the U.S. Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation. The lawmakers thought that consumers needed more time to use the vouchers they were issued because of the volatility of flight schedules during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Among the other four largest airlines, Delta and United seem to be the only ones that reacted positively to regulators' concerns. Both carriers pushed the expiration date on vouchers to the end of 2023.

When ConsumerAffairs reviewed American’s policy, we found that the company is sticking to its guns on its eVouchers. Unless things change, American vouchers are valid for one year from the date of issue, “and we won’t reissue them past the expiration date,” the airline said.

Southwest Airlines is saying goodbye to expiration dates on vouchers. In a first-of-its-kind policy shift, the Dallas-based airline says any unexpired Sout...

Article Image

Spirit accepts JetBlue's merger proposal

Spirit Airlines has finally decided which of its two suitors it wants to partner up with. Early Thursday, the company’s board of directors announced that they have chosen JetBlue’s proposal as the winning pitch.

The companies have signed off on a definitive merger agreement that would create America's fifth-largest airline -- one that will now have a 10.2% market share of miles flown by passengers on domestic flights.

“We are excited to deliver this compelling combination that turbocharges our strategic growth, enabling JetBlue to bring our unique blend of low fares and exceptional service to more customers, on more routes,” said JetBlue CEO Robin Hayes.“Spirit and JetBlue will continue to advance our shared goal of disrupting the industry to bring down fares from the Big Four airlines."

Frontier had Spirit’s attention for a long time, and Spirit honored its original commitment to become part of Frontier’s family after JetBlue pursued a hostile bid and offered a higher price. But, as JetBlue said in an SEC filing, it was fearful that a successful Frontier-Spirit merger would prove to be a larger competitor that could possibly affect its competitiveness. 

Spirit had its reservations too. It may have given in to JetBlue’s advances sooner, but it was concerned that regulators wouldn’t sign off on a deal because of the issues JetBlue was already facing with the “northeast alliance” that it had created with American Airlines.

What this will mean for travelers

It’s too early to tell how all of this will shake out, but airline experts aren't necessarily buying Hayes' comment about industry-disrupting fares.

One issue that could lead to higher fares is JetBlue’s cost of converting Spirit’s jets to its existing configuration – a schematic that has 10-15% fewer revenue-producing seats. “There is no way JetBlue can deliver profitable operations on fewer total seats flying without raising the prices on those seats,” wrote PAXEX.AERO’s Seth Miller.

“[JetBlue] will have to operate the legacy Spirit fleet at fares higher than what Spirit charges today. Plus, with a lower fare competitor eliminated JetBlue likely can afford to raise fares beyond what it charges today.”

You also have to factor in what the big four airlines – American, Delta, United, and Southwest – might do in their reaction to any change in JetBlue-Spirit fares.

"Spirit and Frontier play a big role in the fare you pay, even if you never fly either one," Scott Keyes, founder of discounted fare-finding website Scott's Cheap Flights, told ConsumerAffairs. "When Delta announced the basic economy fare in 2012, they described it to investors as a 'Spirit-matching fare,' because their lunch was getting eaten by the budget carriers of the world. I'm not a fan of either merger, but I like the JetBlue option even less."

Spirit Airlines has finally decided which of its two suitors it wants to partner up with. Early Thursday, the company’s board of directors announced that t...

Article Image

Frontier Airlines makes its last play for Spirit Airlines merger

The Frontier-Spirit-JetBlue saga is not quite over yet. According to CNBC, Frontier Airlines has asked Spirit Airlines to delay a shareholder vote on their planned merger for just a little longer.

In a letter that Frontier CEO Barry Biffle sent to his peers at Spirit, he called his airline’s most recent upgraded cash-and-stock bid the “last, best and final” offer.

However, the real reason seems to be that Spirit’s stockholders aren’t fully buying into the Frontier purchase. “We still remain very far from obtaining approval from Spirit stockholders,” Biffle admitted in the letter.

Where will this all stop?

This merger saga has been packed with twists and turns. Spirit spurned JetBlue’s advances three times, but it decided last week that it would give new consideration to the larger carrier's proposal. Spirit's board pushed back a shareholder vote so that it could have one more round of talks with both airlines and take the temperature of its stockholders. For it's part, Frontier would like for all of this to come to a close too.

“As has been the case throughout this process, we remain committed to this transaction,” Biffle wrote in his letter to Spirit. “However, should the Spirit Board of Directors conclude that it would instead desire to pursue an alternative transaction with JetBlue, we would appreciate being advised of that determination.”

Biffle also reminded Spirit in his letter that a recent decision by the Department of Transportation that granted Spirit an additional 16 slots at Newark Liberty International Airport gave the airline a competitive advantage over JetBlue.

“The path to regulatory approval of a JetBlue-Spirit combination seems more impossible by the day,” he wrote.

The Frontier-Spirit-JetBlue saga is not quite over yet. According to CNBC, Frontier Airlines has asked Spirit Airlines to delay a shareholder vote on their...

Article Image

DOT officials tell airlines that younger children should always be seated next to parents

The U.S. Department of Transportation’s (DOT) Office of Aviation Consumer Protection (OACP) is advising U.S. airlines to do everything possible to ensure that children under the age of 14 are seated next to their parents at no additional charge.  

While the number of family seating complaints that the agency receives is relatively low compared to other types of complaints, officials believe that airlines are going too far when they charge travelers extra for child seating accommodations.

“Airlines should do everything that they can to ensure the ability of a young child (age 13 or younger) to be seated next to an accompanying adult (over age 13) family member or other accompanying adult, without charging fees for adjacent seating,” the Department stated. 

Expectations and "what if" scenarios

The DOT is giving airlines a little time to get their act together on this issue. Beginning November 8, 2022, the Department will be monitoring airlines to ensure that carrier policies and practices do not create a hurdle to a young child being seated next to an adult family member or accompanying adult. 

Parents traveling with children can also do some homework so that they know what their rights are regarding seating arrangements on flights. The DOT offers these two suggestions:

Understand your airline’s seating policies. Parents can get information about a specific airline’s family seating policies directly from the airline. ConsumerAffairs found that the U.S.’ four largest carriers -- Delta Air Lines, United Airlines, American Airlines, and Southwest Airlines -- all had that information on their websites. Consumers who need additional information can also contact the airline through its reservations system.

Book your ticket as early as possible. DOT officials say families should book their flights early to get the best chance of reserving seats next to each other. They note that children should be booked on the same reservation as adults because airlines generally regard all travelers as belonging to one party if they are on the same reservation record. That means they will assign seats with priority given to parents and children on the same reservation. 

For cases in which parents and children are booked on different reservations, the DOT recommends that parents contact their airline as soon as possible to ask if the entire party can be put on the same reservation record or, at a minimum, have their reservations cross-referenced in the booking notes.

Since Murphy’s Law doesn’t exclude airlines, parents need to be ready if something goes wrong and the family is not able to obtain seats together. In those situations, the Department advises parents to ask the airline how it can accommodate the family. Again, the earlier this request is made, the better. 

“Discuss with the airline your concerns about a child being seated alone,” the DOT advises. “Even if the airline is unable to seat the whole family together, they may be able to assure you that each child is seated next to an adult family member.”

The agency offers a list of contacts for consumers who might need to reach out to a specific airline. That list is available here.

The U.S. Department of Transportation’s (DOT) Office of Aviation Consumer Protection (OACP) is advising U.S. airlines to do everything possible to ensure t...

Article Image

Spirit Airlines pauses Frontier merger deal to rethink JetBlue proposal

JetBlue’s countless proposals to bring Spirit Airlines into its fold appear to have finally sunk in. Spirit’s board of directors announced that it intends to reopen and immediately adjourn a Special Meeting of Stockholders relating to the proposed merger agreement with Frontier so that it can continue discussions with both Frontier and JetBlue. 

Spirit seems serious enough about its decision that it’s filed a solicitation/recommendation statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Spirit’s board intends to hold the Special Meeting on July 15. Needless to say, JetBlue felt encouraged by what Spirit had to say.

“[We] are hopeful they now recognize that Spirit shareholders have indicated their clear, overwhelming preference for an agreement with JetBlue,” the airline said in a statement. “We strongly recommend that Spirit shareholders continue to let the Spirit Board know they want to receive the superior value JetBlue has proposed, by voting AGAINST the Frontier transaction.”

Frontier takes its gloves off

Frontier has laid low while JetBlue sought to entice Spirit into merging with it instead, but the company recently denounced JetBlue for coloring the scenario in its favor.

“Over the last few weeks, JetBlue has proclaimed that Spirit management is hiding behind ‘false’ and ‘misleading’ antitrust concerns so as to deny JetBlue the right to take over—and erase from existence—the nation’s largest ultra-low cost carrier,” Frontier said in a press release.

“JetBlue is not telling you the truth. A Spirit acquisition by JetBlue would lead to a dead end—a fact that no amount of money, bluster, or misdirection will change. And the only value Spirit stockholders would be likely to receive from JetBlue’s proposal is the reverse termination fee, because JetBlue’s proposal lacks any realistic likelihood of obtaining regulatory approval.”

If Frontier’s perspective is true, travelers might not like what may come out of a JetBlue-Spirit merger.

“JetBlue admitted that it will permanently remove capacity from the market by retrofitting Spirit’s fleet to remove seats. Antitrust lawyers call that an ‘output restriction,’ and it is fatal to JetBlue’s bid. So are JetBlue’s admitted price increases. Less airline capacity means higher fares,” Frontier said. 

“JetBlue’s CEO, Robin Hayes, certainly knows that. He observed just a few days ago, ‘The average price of air fares will go up because there is [sic] less seats.’ That is exactly what JetBlue would do with Spirit’s fleet.”

JetBlue’s countless proposals to bring Spirit Airlines into its fold appear to have finally sunk in. Spirit’s board of directors announced that it intends...

Flight cancellations decrease following the holiday weekend

After a wild Fourth of July weekend that saw flight cancellations in the U.S. hitting 1,927 on Sunday, things seem to be slowing down but still a far cry from leaving travelers waiting on the tarmac for the next shoe to drop.

According to flight tracking site FlightAware, Monday’s cancellations showed 1,603 flights but that figure could change as the day progressed. From ConsumerAffairs’ experience with these situations, predicting what will happen on Wednesday or Thursday might be a little early, but there’s only 47 flights into, out of, or within the U.S. canceled for Wednesday and 10 for Thursday as of mid-morning Monday.

While a thousand-plus may seem like a significant number, when it’s compared to the total number of flights scheduled, it’s tiny percentage-wise. For example, American Airlines listed 47 canceled flights for Monday, but that only accounts for 1% of its scheduled departures. 

When that percentage climbs double digits, that's when the real fretting should begin. An example of that is for travelers who are flying overseas, particularly to Scandinavia. SAS Airlines – a carrier that serves New York, Miami, Boston, Chicago, San Francisco, and Los Angeles taking travelers to Oslo, Stockholm, and Copenhagen – filed for bankruptcy early Tuesday, forcing 78% (236) of its flights to be taken off the board. FlightAware already has SAS penciled in for another 31% (98) of its scheduled flights to be canceled on Wednesday. 

Get used to it

While it’s no fun for any traveler to play this game, it’s something we might have to contend with for a while. Kathleen Bangs, a former airline pilot now working for FlightAware, said that cancellations continue to be expected because of the staffing situation.

"Weather has always impacted aviation, but the weather so far this summer hasn't been any worse than normal," Bangs told CNN. "When we see severe weather, it is taking airlines longer to scramble and recover. They don't have the deep bench of pilots to call in. It really seems to be more of a systemwide staffing issue, trickling down to the FAA in terms of [the] air traffic control system." In SAS' case, the airline pinned its bankruptcy directly on the pilots.

The unfortunate consequence of the pilot shortage-driven cancellation flurry is that travelers sometimes find themselves put out – completely put out.

“United does not understand that they are not just flying planes, they are transporting PEOPLE. People is a word that United Airlines does not know,” wrote Edgar of Pittsburgh in a recent review he submitted to ConsumerAffairs.

Edgar said the thing that bugged him most about his United nightmare was that the airline waited until “the last minute” to let people know their flight was canceled. “It took me and my wife two hours standing in the check-in counter … until they could figure out what was happening. The United representative was unbelievably rude and unprofessional … laughing at us when we asked [for] a printed hotel confirmation, since we did not have internet access in our phones. It was a very humiliating situation.”

After a wild Fourth of July weekend that saw flight cancellations in the U.S. hitting 1,927 on Sunday, things seem to be slowing down but still a far cry f...

Article Image

Pilot shortage continues, forcing thousands of flights to be canceled over the holiday weekend

Airlines have been canceling flights all year long, and the prospects don’t look any better for the Fourth of July weekend. According to FlightAware, there were 1,948 flights canceled on Friday and another 705 on Saturday.

For many travelers, the Fourth of July weekend is the only time they’ll venture somewhere this summer. That, in and of itself, will be a major headache for the airlines, but the bigger issue airlines are facing is trying to find enough pilots to fly their planes. 

Airlines continue to struggle to replace the thousands of pilots who took buyouts when airlines responded to the COVID-19 pandemic two years ago. Without those pilots to depend on, airlines have little choice but to ground flights. The only thing that might resolve the issue is something that industry analysts are proposing – easing the requirements for pilot certification, including the rule requiring 1,500 hours of flight time before ever sitting in the pilot’s seat on a commercial aircraft.

If you’re flying on Delta, things might be better than on other airlines

If the fact that consumer complaints against airlines have risen 300% above pre-pandemic levels is any indication, anyone who’s flying somewhere this summer needs to be ready for the possibility of their flight being canceled or them being bumped from a flight – a move that, by the way, may sound egregious but is not illegal.

Some of that may depend on what airline you’re flying on. According to Department of Transportation data from April, Delta Air Lines sports the highest on-time arrival rates – 81.9%. The airline looks like it's prepared for the worst this weekend. FlightAware data shows that Delta has zero flights canceled for Saturday.

But Delta knows things can change quickly, and it has decided to be as proactive as possible to avoid creating headaches for holiday travelers by preemptively issuing travel waivers for flights between July 1 and July 4.

According to SimpleFlying, Delta Air Lines is “significantly” allowing its customers to change their flights for free and waive any resulting difference in fare for travel booked for July 1 - 4. It's also giving those fliers an opportunity to rebook their trips before or after potentially challenging weekend travel days.

“This unique waiver is being issued to give Delta customers greater flexibility to plan around busy travel times, weather forecasts and other variables without worrying about a potential cost to do so," the airline noted in a blog post. 

Waiver or not, even the most undaunted of travelers should be thinking ahead and considering their options.

"If you’re flying Delta — or any other airline — this weekend, it might be best to try and change to the first flight of the day, if possible, as those flights are the least likely to be delayed or canceled," Ethan Klapper wrote for The Points Guy. 

"Also, if you’re traveling ahead of a cruise or an important gathering, try and leave some additional buffer between your flight and wherever you’re headed," Klapper added.

Airlines have been canceling flights all year long, and the prospects don’t look any better for the Fourth of July weekend. According to FlightAware, there...

Article Image

United Airlines close to new 'bar-raising' contract with pilots

United Airlines and its 14,000-strong pilots' union have a tentative deal in place that would bump up pilots’ pay by more than 14.5% in the next year and a half. The agreement makes United the first major U.S. airline to reach a deal since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic and likely establishes a new mark that its competitors will be asked to match.

The agreement has also added an incentive for pilots who are looking for work to knock on United’s door. There are plenty of pilot jobs for the industry to fill, with the shortage forcing some carriers to pull back on their flight schedules. A successful contract negotiation means there is less of a chance of there being canceled flights or fallout in the future.

“This agreement raises the bar for all airline pilots and leads the industry forward,” said Capt. Michael Hamilton, Chair of ALPA’s United pilot group. “Our ability to reach this agreement, and the current success of United Airlines, is driven by front-line United pilots who stayed unified and focused throughout negotiations despite the incredible challenges we faced during the largest disruption in the history of aviation.”

If ratified, the tentative agreement will reportedly generate an additional $1.3 billion of value for United pilots over the course of the two-year agreement.

What else is in the deal?

The two-year agreement also includes several attractive perks, including:

  • Eight weeks of paid maternity leave, a first for the carrier’s pilots and a definite plus for the 7% of United pilots who are women

  • “Enhanced” overtime compensation and “premium” pay

  • “Quality of life improvements” that are designed to give pilots more flexibility in their schedules

Approval by a majority of the voting membership is needed for ratification, and voting closes July 15, 2022.

United Airlines and its 14,000-strong pilots' union have a tentative deal in place that would bump up pilots’ pay by more than 14.5% in the next year and a...

Article Image

Summer airfares are soaring

If you haven’t booked your flight yet, your summer travel plans just got more expensive. The cost of commercial airline fares continued to rise last month, soaring 12.6% in May after increasing 18.6% in April.

While inflation is pushing up the cost of nearly everything, airfares face an economic “perfect storm.” After two years of the COVID-19 pandemic, millions of Americans are ready to travel again, so demand for airline tickets is higher than usual.

At the same time, airlines are facing a shortage of pilots. Many took early retirement at the start of the pandemic at the encouragement of their employers. COVID-19 also led to a reduction in training programs for new pilots.

And then there is the cost of fuel. Distillate prices have recently hit record highs, along with gasoline prices. An airline’s cost to fly from one city to another is significantly higher than six months ago.

But staff shortages may prove to be the biggest driver of high airfares because there will be fewer planes in the air this summer. Back in 2021, United fired about 1% of its workforce for not getting a COVID-19 vaccination.

Problem began pre-pandemic

The management consulting firm Oliver Wyman reports U.S. airlines were facing a growing pilot shortage in 2019, before the pandemic. It traces the problem to an aging workforce, barriers to entry and fewer pilots leaving the military – a significant source of new commercial pilots.

The problem was made worse by how airlines reacted to the pandemic. With a huge drop in business almost overnight, airlines canceled flights and encouraged older pilots to retire. United Airlines CEO Scott Kirby told analysts in April that he expects the pilot shortage could last for five years or more.

Now that people want to fly again, travel experts say there is more demand than supply, the classic ingredient for inflation. Willis Orlando, senior product operations specialist at Scott’s Cheap Flights, says demand is really what’s driving the current surge in airfares.

“The airlines are charging a premium right now for summer travel because they can, with demand through the roof,” Orlando told ConsumerAffairs. “But once demand levels out, as it does every autumn, prices should level out with it.”

In the meantime, Orlando says summer travelers should be as flexible as possible. For the best fares, he suggests traveling in the middle of the week and avoiding the most popular destinations.

If you haven’t booked your flight yet, your summer travel plans just got more expensive. The cost of commercial airline fares continued to rise last month,...

Article Image

U.S. expected to end COVID-19 testing requirements for air travelers

The last hurdle for international travelers entering the United States is on the verge of being removed. CNN reports that the Biden White House is expected to announce sometime Friday that the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) will lift its mandate that air travelers flying into the U.S. must test negative for COVID-19 before entering the country.

If all goes accordingly, the requirement will go into effect at 12:01 a.m. on Sunday, June 12.

CNN cited an anonymous CDC official who said the agency would continue to evaluate the situation every 90 days. If a new variant emerges and causes concern, the mandate could be reinstated at a later date.

Travel groups celebrate the move

Travel groups have been begging the White House to lift some COVID-19 test requirements for vaccinated passengers since February, and research backs up those pleas. A recent study from Harvard’s T.H. Chan School of Public Health concluded that being on an airplane is as safe – if not safer – than shopping at a grocery store or going to a restaurant.

Relief won’t just be felt by travelers; the travel industry stated that repealing pre-departure testing requirements could bring an additional 5.4 million visitors to the U.S. and an additional $9 billion in travel spending through the remainder of 2022.

“Today marks another huge step forward for the recovery of inbound air travel and the return of international travel to the United States,” U.S. Travel Association President and CEO Roger Dow said in a statement sent to ConsumerAffairs. “The Biden administration is to be commended for this action, which will welcome back visitors from around the world and accelerate the recovery of the U.S. travel industry.”

“International inbound travel is vitally important to businesses and workers across the country who have struggled to regain losses from this valuable sector. More than half of international travelers in a recent survey pointed to the pre-departure testing requirement as a major deterrent for inbound travel to the U.S.”​​

The last hurdle for international travelers entering the United States is on the verge of being removed. CNN reports that the Biden White House is expected...

Article Image

JetBlue sends Spirit Airlines a third merger proposal

JetBlue has come knocking on Spirit Airlines' door again. On Monday, Spirit confirmed that JetBlue sent its third proposal to acquire every last outstanding share of Spirit's common stock that’s available, enabling Spirit to call off its other proposed merger with Frontier Airlines.

By this time, Spirit’s Board of Directors knows the drill. Because it has fiduciary duties to honor, the Board will work with its financial and legal advisors to appraise what JetBlue is pitching, then decide what its next step would be depending on what it considers to be the best interests of both the company and its stockholders. 

Enticing shareholders

In its latest effort, JetBlue sent a message to Spirit team members in a not-so-shy effort to curry some favor from within.

“We know this process may be unsettling, and we thought you might like to hear from us directly. We do not want all the conversation about a ‘hostile’ takeover to discourage you about your potential future with JetBlue should we reach an agreement with Spirit,” the letter said.

JetBlue went on to pitch all the perks it has laid on the table so far: higher pay, better benefits, retention incentives, and the fact that it’s never furloughed any crewmembers or been sent a WARN Act notice in its 22-year history. The furlough pitch might have some interest for Spirit employees since the airline went through a small furlough and got dangerously close to another in 2020.

“More than anything, we want you to know that we are genuinely excited about the opportunity to combine with Spirit. We have so much respect for Spirit Team Members and believe we can bring together the best of both airlines to create a new national low-fare carrier to go up against the Big Four,” JetBlue stated.

Until its board members change their minds, Spirit appears fully committed to its deal with Frontier and is out trying to muster some Yes votes of its own. On its special “VoteSpiritFrontier” website, the airline tells voters that "everyone wins" if they vote for the Frontier deal.

“Everyone wins. A vote FOR the merger is a vote FOR even more ultra-low fares to more places,” the airlines stated. “This is the right deal for Spirit and its shareholders.”

JetBlue has come knocking on Spirit Airlines' door again. On Monday, Spirit confirmed that JetBlue sent its third proposal to acquire every last outstandin...

Article Image

Spirit Airlines' board of directors rejects JetBlue's hostile takeover effort

After huddling with outside legal and financial advisors, Spirit Airlines announced that its Board of Directors has unanimously decided to reject a hostile takeover effort recently taken by JetBlue.

The directors believe the JetBlue deal would face substantial regulatory hurdles, especially while the Northeast Alliance ("NEA") with American Airlines hangs in the balance. In their estimation, the potential deal is not superior to the merger Spirit has already agreed to with Frontier.

Just in case Spirit stockholders were leaning towards supporting the deal with JetBlue, the Spirit Board has written them a letter asking them not to. Instead, they're urging shareholders to vote for the merger agreement with Frontier. 

“In that scenario, a $1.83 per share reverse break-up fee will not come close to adequately compensating Spirit stockholders for the significant business disruption Spirit will face during what JetBlue acknowledges will be a protracted regulatory process,” wrote Mac Gardner, Chairman of the Board of Directors for Spirit Airlines.

JetBlue responds

As much as it seems like some Spirit officials would like JetBlue to just go away, the company is not giving up on its merger goal.

“It’s no surprise that Spirit shareholders are getting more of the same from the Spirit Board. The Spirit Board, driven by serious conflicts of interest, continues to ignore the best interests of its shareholders by distorting the facts to distract from their flawed process and protect their inferior deal with Frontier,” JetBlue said in a statement.

JetBlue added that the merger deal between Spirit and Frontier is also far from a slam dunk when it comes to regulatory approval. 

"Both deals are subject to regulatory review, and both deals have a similar risk profile. Frontier offers less value, more risk, and no regulatory commitments, despite a similar regulatory profile," JetBlue said in its response.

"We are confident that as we continue to share the facts directly with Spirit shareholders, they will be even more perplexed than they already are about why the conflicted Spirit Board has refused to negotiate with us in good faith. We believe that the Spirit shareholders will make their views known by voting against the Frontier offer and tendering their shares into our offer."

After huddling with outside legal and financial advisors, Spirit Airlines announced that its Board of Directors has unanimously decided to reject a hostile...

Article Image

FAA gives United Airlines green light to return Boeing 777 aircraft to service

United Airlines confirmed Tuesday that the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has given it permission to return 52 Boeing 777 aircraft to service. The planes had been grounded due to engine failure following a flight from Denver to Honolulu in February 2021.

The airline said it would take a measured approach in bringing the aircraft back into action to ensure that they are safe for the flying public. The carrier had previously pushed back returning the planes to service by an extra month.

The grounded 777s accounted for only about 10% of United’s capacity. The carrier typically uses 777s for longer and more traveled flights, such as Washington Dulles to Los Angeles and Chicago to San Francisco.

“Late last night, the FAA issued the final paperwork on our Pratt & Whitney-powered triple sevens,” Andrew Nocella, Chief Commercial Officer at United Airlines, said at a Bank of America industry conference.

United Airlines confirmed Tuesday that the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has given it permission to return 52 Boeing 777 aircraft to service. The p...

Article Image

JetBlue attempts hostile takeover of Spirit Airlines

JetBlue doesn't appear to be taking "no" for an answer. After Spirit Airlines rejected JetBlue's recent offer to merge in favor of a deal with Frontier Airlines, the jilted company decided to ask Spirit shareholders for their support.

In both a letter to Spirit’s board of directors and a special website designed to convince Spirit’s board, JetBlue told Spirit that it has filed a “Vote No” proxy statement that urges Spirit shareholders to vote against “the inferior, high risk, and low-value Spirit/Frontier transaction at Spirit’s upcoming special meeting.”

How badly does JetBlue want Spirit as one of its own? How about a $200 million reverse break-up fee as an incentive? 

Didn’t get a fair shake

JetBlue CEO Robin Hayes rolled out everything he could to convince Spirit that it was going in the wrong direction.

“JetBlue offers more value – a significant premium in cash – more certainty, and more benefits for all stakeholders. Frontier offers less value, more risk, no divestiture commitments, and no reverse break-up fee, despite more overlap on non-stop routes and their own regulatory challenges," Hayes wrote in his letter.

The thing that apparently irritates Hayes the most is that Spirit didn’t give JetBlue a fair or equal chance.

“The Spirit Board … rejected our proposal … without asking us even a single question about it. The Spirit Board based its rejection on unsupportable claims that are easily refuted,” Hayes said.

ConsumerAffairs reached out to Spirit for a response to JetBlue’s latest move but did not immediately receive a response.

JetBlue doesn't appear to be taking "no" for an answer. After Spirit Airlines rejected JetBlue's recent offer to merge in favor of a deal with Frontier Air...

Article Image

Airline satisfaction falls as planes begin to refill

Airports are crowded once again, and the increase in Americans taking to the sky coincides with a sharp drop in airline customer satisfaction, according to the latest survey by J.D. Power.

After a year in which planes sometimes flew with half their seats empty, aircraft cabins are packed once again. That middle seat that was unoccupied for the better part of 2020 and 2021 has someone in it now.

Michael Taylor, travel intelligence lead at J.D. Power, says customer satisfaction with North American airlines was very high over the last couple of years, but that was mainly because there were fewer people flying.

“Fewer passengers meant more space on airplanes, less waiting in line, and more attention from flight attendants,” Taylor said. “But that business model was simply not sustainable.”

While passengers were fairly content the airlines were losing money. Now planes are full once again and passengers are having to contend with long lines at security checkpoints and crowded aircraft.

Twenty points lower than a year ago

The J.D. Power survey found that overall passenger satisfaction across all three segments – first/business, premium economy, and economy/basic economy – registered just 798 on a 1,000-point scale, more than 20 points lower than a year ago. Passenger satisfaction with cost, flight crews, and aircraft all declined in this year’s study.

The top-rated airlines in J.D. Power’s study are JetBlue Airways, Alaska Airlines, and Delta Air Lines. In the economy/basic economy class, Southwest Airlines ranks highest.

ConsumerAffairs reviewers, however, have a different point of view. Based on thousands of verified reviews over the last 12 months using our 5-star rating system, here’s how our reviewers rate the major airlines:

  • American 3.8-stars

  • Spirit 3.8-stars

  • United  3.7-stars

  • Delta  3.7-stars

  • Jet Blue 3.6-stars

  • Alaska 3.0-stars

  • Southwest 1.5-stars

‘Like losing an old friend’

The shocker is Southwest’s 1.5-star rating, which is driven largely by a significant number of 1-star reviews over the last 12 months. Tiffany, of Covina, Calif., describes herself as a longtime Southwest fan. However, she told us that she lost patience after the airline lost her luggage on two flights between December and April.

“Come on SW...live up to the standards you once set,” Tiffany wrote in a ConsumerAffairs review. “It is like losing an old friend.”

Another surprise in our ratings was Spirit Airlines' tie for first place. Stephanie, of Cresent City, Fla., posted a glowing review in January.

“Every time I fly with them they leave and land on time,” Stephanie wrote. “My last flight we were in seats all the way in the back with no window. They got our seats changed in an already full flight. They are always friendly. I’ve yet to have a problem with them. And their fares are always priced right.” 

Fares are rising because of skyrocketing jet fuel prices, and J.D. Power predicts that those increases could keep satisfaction levels low for a while. Even before the latest price spike, overall satisfaction with cost and fees declined in the premium economy segment by 66 points and by 21 points in the first/business class segment.

Airports are crowded once again, and the increase in Americans taking to the sky coincides with a sharp drop in airline customer satisfaction, according to...

Article Image

Spirit Airlines rejects merger offer made by JetBlue

Back in February, Spirit Airlines announced that it would be merging with Frontier Airlines to create a larger, combined carrier. However, JetBlue recently made an offer for Spirit to break up that previous deal and merge with it instead.

Unfortunately for JetBlue, it seems that Spirit is staying with the deal it originally cut with Frontier Airlines. After consulting with outside financial and legal advisors, Spirit officials announced Monday that the company's board of directors unanimously determined that JetBlue’s “unsolicited proposal” did not constitute a 'Superior Proposal' as defined in Spirit's merger agreement with Frontier. 

“The Board continues to believe that the pending transaction with Frontier represents the best opportunity to maximize value and recommends that Spirit shareholders adopt the merger agreement with Frontier,” the announcement read. 

Potential legal issues

It wasn’t that becoming part of the JetBlue family didn’t have upside potential -- like "creating the most compelling national low-fare challenger to the U.S. major airlines" -- but changing partners in the middle of Spirit’s walk down the aisle with Frontier apparently raised legal concerns. 

“After a thorough review and extensive dialogue with JetBlue, the Board determined that the JetBlue proposal involves an unacceptable level of closing risk that would be assumed by Spirit stockholders,” said Mac Gardner, Chairman of Board of Directors for Spirit Airlines.

The board stated that the JetBlue-Spirit combination has a “low probability of receiving antitrust clearance so long as JetBlue's Northeast Alliance with American Airlines remains in existence.” 

The U.S. Department of Justice has sued to block that very alliance, alleging that it "will not only eliminate important competition in [Boston and New York City], but will also harm air travelers across the country by significantly diminishing JetBlue's incentive to compete with American elsewhere, further consolidating an already highly concentrated industry."

Back in February, Spirit Airlines announced that it would be merging with Frontier Airlines to create a larger, combined carrier. However, JetBlue recently...

Article Image

FAA makes zero-tolerance policy against unruly passengers permanent

The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) says it has seen enough bad behavior over the last couple of years that it’s going to make its Zero Tolerance policy against unruly passengers permanent. 

While the agency's Zero Tolerance policy has helped reduce incident rates by more than 60%, the FAA feels it still has a long way to go. Officials say they will issue a fine of up to $37,000 to anyone who crosses the policy's lines going forward. In the past, the FAA tried to deal with unruly passengers by issuing warning letters or requiring counseling, but those attempts apparently weren’t taken seriously and are no longer part of the FAA’s disciplining procedures. Previously, the maximum civil penalty per violation was $25,000. 

“Behaving dangerously on a plane will cost you; that’s a promise,” said Acting FAA Administrator Billy Nolen. “Unsafe behavior simply does not fly and keeping our Zero Tolerance policy will help us continue making progress to prevent and punish this behavior.” 

Unruly passengers might be looking at even tougher penalties soon. Legislation that could permanently ban a traveler from flying ever again was recently introduced in Congress.

What passengers shouldn't do

The FAA wants it made clear that there are certain lines under its updated policy that travelers should never cross. Here are two big points that travelers should keep in mind:

Travelers who interfere with the duties of a crewmember are violating federal law. By “interfering,” the agency means assault, intimidation, or threats made to anyone involved with the plane’s operation.

A $37,000 fine will be assessed for each violation. If a passenger crosses the line in several different ways, they could be hit with multiple fines.

If it had the power to do so, the FAA might have taken even tougher action. However, the agency only has civil authority to impose fines and does not have criminal prosecutorial authority.

Nonetheless, officials say they're trying to add in a little more sting. For one thing, the FAA is now working with the Transportation Safety Authority (TSA) to revoke TSA PreCheck for unruly passengers that it fines. As of Feb. 16, 2022, it had referred 80 unruly passenger cases to the FBI for criminal review. 

Some airlines revoke bans for mask violations

Despite the TSA fining 922 people for violating mask mandates and issuing 2,709 warnings between Feb. 2, 2021, and March 7, 2022, Delta Air Lines and United Airlines have decided that they will let some passengers banned for mask violations back on their flights.

"At Delta, nothing is more important than the safety and security of our customers and our people. With masks now optional, Delta will restore flight privileges for customers on the mask non-compliance no-fly list only after each case is reviewed and each customer demonstrates an understanding of their expected behavior when flying with us," the airline said in a statement.

As for United, it said it's taking things on a case-by-case basis.

"We will allow some customers who were previously banned for failing to comply with mask-related rules to fly United again -- after ensuring their commitment to follow all crewmember instructions on board," the airline said in a statement.

The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) says it has seen enough bad behavior over the last couple of years that it’s going to make its Zero Tolerance pol...

Article Image

American Airlines CEO vows reliability as massive peak travel season kicks off

American Airlines CEO Robert Isom says the airline is all ready to go for the 2022 summer travel season. In a meeting with pilots, Isom said travelers can count on American to manage the expected increase in passengers for both the summer and beyond.

The airline has had to deal with some bumps in recent months, including issues with fuel shortages, system-wide cancellations brought on by bad weather, and issues with pilots. However, Isom says that’s all in the past. 

“People really need to feel like they have control of their itineraries and we give them control by making sure they get to where they want to go on time. I just can’t be any more blunt about it than that,” Isom told pilots during a company town hall, according to CNBC. “Other airlines are really struggling.” 

Isom didn’t call any other airline out specifically, but he may be talking about JetBlue and Alaska Airlines. Earlier this month, both companies said they were pulling back on their normal flight schedules. For JetBlue, that cut was sizable – 8% to 10% at least through the end of May. The company is hoping to minimize the impact of seasonal weather interruptions and air traffic control disruptions going forward.

Airlines offer more to keep consumers happy

Airlines will need to be on top of their game in the coming months to satisfy the throngs of people who are returning to the skies. Many carriers are already taking extra steps like upgrading mileage programs or offering enticing fares to keep travelers happy.

Despite an extension of the face mask mandate, the Transportation Security Administration reports that it is already seeing more people going through security. Passenger screenings jumped to 2.3 million people this past Friday, up 57% from a year ago.

American Airlines CEO Robert Isom says the airline is all ready to go for the 2022 summer travel season. In a meeting with pilots, Isom said travelers can...

Article Image

Senate considers bill to ban unruly passengers from flying

A bill designed to protect airline crew members, security screening personnel, and passengers by banning abusive travelers from commercial aircraft flights has been introduced in the U.S. Senate.

Sen. Jack Reed (D-RI), the lawmaker behind the effort, said his Protection from Abusive Passengers Act is directed at “eliminating the rash of violence and abuse” travelers have been facing for more than two years.

Despite the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) trying everything from fines to turning unruly passengers over to the FBI for criminal review, some flyers continue to disrupt flights with their behaviors. The FAA’s latest report on the situation shows that there have been 1,081 reports of unruly passengers so far this year.

"The goal of our bill is to send a clear signal that individuals who engage in serious abusive or violent behavior on an aircraft or at an airport security checkpoint will be banned from flying,” Reed said in introducing the bill. “Clearly, the existing regime of civil and criminal penalties has not been enough to deter the upsurge in cases. We need to send a signal that such types of behavior will not be tolerated.”

The bill is also being introduced in the House by Representatives Brian Fitzpatrick (R-PA) and Eric Swalwell (D-CA).

Flight attendants applaud proposal

If the legislation makes it to President Biden’s desk and gets his signature, it should give airline officials enough muscle to affect real change. If passed, the legislation would require the TSA to create and manage a program that would ban certain disruptive or violent passengers from ever stepping foot on a commercial airline. The bill would also permanently ban abusive passengers from participating in the TSA PreCheck or Customs' Global Entry programs.

Flight attendants – who have borne the brunt of much of the abuse – are cheerleading Reed’s efforts wholeheartedly. 

"It’s about time we take real action to keep Flight Attendants and passengers safe in the air. Senator Reed and Representative Swalwell are heroes for introducing the legislation to protect Flight Attendants and Passenger Service Agents,” said Sara Nelson, president of the Association of Flight Attendants-CWA, a group that represents nearly 50,000 Flight Attendants at 17 airlines. 

“Violence and disruptions put everyone at risk and disrupts the safety of flight," Nelson added. "That is never acceptable. We've been punched, kicked, spit on, and sexually assaulted. We urge members of Congress to co-sign this bill and pass this legislation without delay. Hold violent passengers accountable, protect aviation workers and improve aviation safety.”

A bill designed to protect airline crew members, security screening personnel, and passengers by banning abusive travelers from commercial aircraft flights...

Article Image

Alaska Airlines earns best frequent flyer program honors for 2022 in recent survey

With pandemic troubles continuing to subside, more people are venturing out and looking to travel. It's a fact that’s making everyone in the travel food chain – from amusement parks to airlines – excited about the prospects of 2022’s summer travel season.

But those prospects come loaded with questions when it comes to airlines. Which carriers offer the best fares, what frequent flyer programs are the best, and who do travelers consider the best airlines? To help travelers arrive at the best decisions for their budgets, WalletHub has released its 2022 report for one of those segments – frequent flyer programs.

The winners

WalletHub analysts ranked the 10 largest U.S. airlines based on 21 key metrics, ranging from the value of a point/mile to blackout dates for reward flights. Here are the points/miles programs that WalletHub scored the highest:

Best Frequent Flyer Program: Overall, the WalletHub researchers gave Alaska Airlines’ Mileage Plan the nod for the best frequent flyer program of 2022, beating last year’s winner -- United MileagePlus.

Best Bang for the Buck: When it comes to “value spent,” the analysts found that Hawaiian Airlines offers the most rewards value, at $24.78 per $100 spent. Alaska Airlines came in second, with $24.65 per $100 spent. Rounding out the top five in that category were Frontier Airlines ($14.67 per $100 spent), Delta Air Lines ($10.35), and United Airlines ($10.30).

Best Airline Credit Card: The JetBlue Plus Card is 2022’s best airline credit card, according to the WalletHub editors. Also ranked high on that list were co-branded credit cards from American, Delta, United, Southwest, and Alaska Airlines. Most of those also ranked high on ConsumerAffairs’ list of the Best Airline Credit Cards of 2022.

Should travelers try to shoot for elite status?

Travelers often wonder whether it's really worth it to try to reach an airline’s elite status level. When that question was posed to Charles R. Taylor, the John A. Murphy Professor of Marketing at the Villanova School of Business, he said the benefits are good – and plentiful. 

“While it can be difficult (and probably more difficult than it should be) in some programs to redeem free flights, consumers willing to be flexible in the time of the reward flights will generally come out okay. For elite flyers, the benefits of shorter check-in lines, free baggage, customer service hotlines, and occasional or frequent complimentary upgrades are very real,” Taylor commented.

“There is little question that most of the major carriers have skewed more benefits to those who are the most frequent flyers. While this has ruffled some feathers due to some benefits being rolled back for general members, it does make sense in the sense that the elite flyers spend considerably more on air travel than most every day flyers.”

With pandemic troubles continuing to subside, more people are venturing out and looking to travel. It's a fact that’s making everyone in the travel food ch...

Article Image

U.S. airlines ask Biden officials to drop mask mandate

U.S. airline officials are asking the White House to lift the federal mask mandate on airplanes, as well as the pre-departure testing requirement for international travelers flying back into the U.S.

In their collective opinion, chief executives and officials representing Delta, United, American, Airlines for America, and seven other U.S. airlines say discontinuing the mandate is warranted due to the falloff in COVID-19 cases in the U.S. They also say these actions are already happening in other consumer categories across the country. 

This is the second such effort to roll back the federal mask mandate in the last couple of weeks. Earlier this month, the U.S. Senate passed a resolution to end the mandate for travel after President Biden, the Transportation Safety Authority (TSA), and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) extended the mask mandate until mid-April.

Mandate doesn't fit the COVID-19 situation

The main ax the airlines have to grind with the White House is that the mandate is “no longer aligned with the realities of the current epidemiological environment.”

"During the global health crisis, U.S. airlines have supported and cooperated with the federal government's measures to slow the spread of COVID-19. We are encouraged by the current data and the lifting of COVID-19 restrictions from coast to coast, which indicate it is past time to eliminate COVID-era transportation policies," the group wrote in a letter to President Biden. 

The U.S. Travel Association also called on the Biden administration to drop the current protocol mandates, saying in a statement that the "public health benefits of these policies have now greatly diminished" and that the "economic consequences continue to grow."

The plea to end the federal mask mandate comes as Canada, the Netherlands, Thailand, and other countries have dropped pre-arrival testing. Aruba, Ireland, Iceland, and the United Kingdom have also removed pandemic-era travel restrictions completely.

U.S. airline officials are asking the White House to lift the federal mask mandate on airplanes, as well as the pre-departure testing requirement for inter...

Article Image

More destinations to allow vaccinated travelers to visit without prior COVID-19 tests

As the number of new COVID-19 cases continues to subside, travel is once again on the upswing. There are plenty of great airfare deals being offered, and several countries -- including the U.K., France, Ireland, and the Netherlands -- are officially ending or easing their COVID-19 restrictions. Travel groups are also asking the White House to loosen its testing requirements for flyers.

Although there has been some improvement, anxious travelers are still facing a tangled mess of where they can go and what the requirements are. In looking for a comprehensive list of where people can travel without having to worry about a lot of restrictions, ConsumerAffairs found all it needed from travel expert Wendy Perrin.

Wendy offers a full list of countries that are open to vaccinated travelers with no pre-trip COVID-19, including Denmark, Germany, and Spain. Consumers can view the full list here.

Other requirements may still apply

While some countries might have done away with pre-test requirements, that doesn’t mean they’ve lifted all restrictions. Some still require a traveler to be fully vaccinated or to have received one vaccine dose while also having recovered from COVID-19.

Some countries – like Peru – require either full vaccination or a PCR test issued up to 48 hours before boarding a flight. Others like Sweden have an either/or of their own, such as a full vaccination with the initial dose within the last 180 days, or a booster shot.

Before booking a flight, travelers are being urged to make sure they understand what each individual country requires for entry. It's also smart to check which countries the State Department has designated as "do not travel" destinations. A complete list of those countries is available here.

Travelers need test to come back to the U.S.

The U.S. hasn’t moved off of its requirement that returning American travelers must show proof of a negative test result taken within one day of travel.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) offers a complete rundown of requirements and suggestions for international travelers. You can find that information here.

As the number of new COVID-19 cases continues to subside, travel is once again on the upswing. There are plenty of great airfare deals being offered, and s...

Article Image

Frontier and Spirit Airlines announce merger

Budget carriers Frontier Airlines and Spirit Airlines are merging into what officials hope will be America’s most competitive ultra-low fare airline.

The union brings with it some great upsides for travelers if all goes according to plan. In an announcement, the companies project that consumers will save a billion dollars annually and have more flights to small- and mid-sized cities. By the time the ink dries on the deal, the combined power will get Frontier/Spirit into 145 markets across the U.S., the Caribbean, and Latin America.

A name for the new combined entity is still up in the air. A Frontier spokesperson said a brand name won’t be determined “for some time. The new Frontier/Spirit combination should be formidable when it comes to fares -- especially at a time when they are expected to rise. 

“Competition between airlines is the single biggest determinant of how many airlines travelers will see on a given route. If the Frontier-Spirit merger (assuming it's approved by regulators) results in a consolidated airline that flies fewer routes, higher profits for the airline will mean more expensive fares for Americans,” Scott Keyes, Founder of Scott’s Cheap Flights, told ConsumerAffairs. 

“But if the new airline remains aggressive in its route network—as both airlines have historically been—and puts more international routes on the schedule, we could see cheaper flights across the board, even for consumers who never fly budget carriers. We've been living in the Golden Age of Cheap Flights since 2015, thanks in large part to budget airlines forcing full-service airlines to slash their fares. With today's news, the best case scenario for consumers is a stronger, larger budget airline that can compete even more with U.S. legacy carriers.”

More jobs and greener airlines

Combining forces will have some other positive upsides too. For one thing, the new company will add 10,000 direct jobs by 2026. It is also ordering 350 new energy-efficient Airbus A320neo jets that will supposedly make the new combined company the youngest and greenest airline.

“This combination is all about growth, opportunities and creating value for everyone – from our Guests to our Team Members to the flying public at large,” said Mac Gardner, Chairman of the Board of Spirit Airlines.

“We’re a perfect fit – our businesses share similar values, including our longstanding commitment to affordable travel. At the same time, we have complementary footprints and fleets, including one of the youngest and greenest fleets worldwide. Together, we will be even more competitive for our Guests and our Team Members, and we are confident we can deliver on the benefits of this combination to consumers.”

Budget carriers Frontier Airlines and Spirit Airlines are merging into what officials hope will be America’s most competitive ultra-low fare airline.Th...

Article Image

Travel group asks White House to lift some COVID-19 test requirements for vaccinated passengers

Airlines for America (A4A), the industry trade organization representing United, Delta, American, and other major U.S. airlines, is spearheading a drive to have the requirement for pre-departure testing for vaccinated passengers traveling to the United States completely removed.

In its letter to Jeffrey Zients, the White House coronavirus response coordinator, A4A argued that a lower pervasiveness of COVID-19 cases in all 50 states, increased immunity, higher vaccination rates, and new treatments make some testing unnecessary.

“Removing the requirement will greatly support the recovery of travel and aviation in the United States and globally without increasing the spread of COVID-19 and its variants,” wrote the 29 groups behind the effort. 

What the group is asserting

To support its pitch, A4A pointed out several things:

We have to deal with the fact that COVID-19 has become a part of everyone’s lives. The group stated that attempts to control COVID-19’s importation via air travel under today’s circumstances are unlikely to change the fact that the pandemic is literally everywhere. “No new threatening variants appear to be imminent, but if they were, pre-departure testing could be easily reinstituted,” it stated.

The EU has already made a similar move. A4A's second contention is that the European Union has recommended that its countries remove intra-Europe COVID-19 travel restrictions, and the United Kingdom has announced the removal of COVID-19 pre-departure testing for vaccinated air travelers to enter the country. The group asked Zients to look at what the UK discovered when it faced the same situation.

“It concluded that the cost to both passengers and airlines of the testing mandate could no longer be justified as there was no evidence the regime protected the population from COVID,” the group's letter read.

The WHO agrees with A4A's position. While the White House probably favors studies and conclusions from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the group suggested that officials look at what the World Health Organization (WHO) has to say about the situation.

“The WHO recommends that states consider a risk-based approach to the facilitation of international travel by lifting measures, such as testing and/or quarantine requirements, for individual travelers who are fully vaccinated, at least two weeks prior to traveling, with COVID-19 vaccines listed by the WHO for emergency use or approved by a stringent regulatory authority,” A4A stated.

Pre-departure testing is hurting international travel. “Surveys of air passengers indicate that pre-departure testing is a leading factor in the decision not to travel internationally,” the group claims. “People simply are unwilling to take the chance that they will be unable to return to the U.S. at the end of their business trip or vacation. As a result, international travel in 2021 was 75 percent below 2019 levels.”

“Till further notice” for international travelers

The group may not get a response anytime soon, so international travelers will have to continue proving that they are healthy before setting foot on a plane. The CDC’s basic requirements for international travel are that:

  • Travelers need to get a COVID-19 viral test (regardless of vaccination status or citizenship) no more than 1 day before they travel by air into the United States.
  • Travelers must show their negative result to the airline before they board their flight.
  • For travelers who recently recovered from COVID-19, they may instead travel with documentation of recovery from COVID-19 (i.e., a positive COVID-19 viral test result on a sample taken no more than 90 days before the flight’s departure from a foreign country and a letter from a licensed healthcare provider or a public health official stating that you were cleared to travel).

While test providers say the turnaround time for test results is a matter of hours, that promise may come with a precaution. Take CVS, for example. On its COVID-19 testing website, the company says rapid-result (PCR) results can be provided "within hours." However, it also hedges that statement by stating that high demand at labs "can lead to delays in turnaround times."

One ConsumerAffairs reviewer found out about that proviso personally. “BEWARE those who are considering CVS for their Covid test results for travel,” wrote Pooja from Enola, Penn. “I am so disappointed with CVS on Covid testing, better look for other options if you are traveling and a negative Covid test is a requirement for boarding the flight.”

Pooja said they gave CVS their swab on Saturday at noon and had mentioned that it was for travel purposes. They were assured that they would receive the test results by Monday afternoon for an evening flight. You can guess what came next.

“But [I] didn't receive the test results until midnight. I had to reschedule my international travel because of this delay of CVS and had to pay the fare difference.”

Airlines for America (A4A), the industry trade organization representing United, Delta, American, and other major U.S. airlines, is spearheading a drive to...

Article Image

Thousands of flights canceled as winter storm Landon treks across U.S.

As winter storm Landon begins its 2,000-mile journey from Texas through the Northeast, it’s causing thousands of flight cancellations for most of the major airlines.

On Thursday, FlightAware had logged over 5,000 cancellations within, into, or out of the U.S., a statistic that is likely to hold its own as Landon continues its trek over the weekend.

Carriers like Southwest and American are canceling more flights than others because many of their flights start in Texas. Carriers like Delta and Allegiant have fewer canceled flights because many of their flights start from Atlanta, where the temperature is currently in the 50s and appears to be out of the storm’s path. Many of Allegiant's flights are also below the storm line.

What you need to know if your flight is canceled

Ever since the pandemic entered our lives, the question of consumer rights when flights are canceled has become a hot topic. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) says there are certain things travelers need to know when a flight is delayed or canceled.

The agency notes that if a flight is “delayed," then a traveler is not entitled to money or other compensation from the airline.

“There are no federal laws requiring airlines to provide passengers with money or other compensation when their flights are delayed,” the FAA stated. “Each airline has its own policies about what it will do for delayed passengers.  If your flight is experiencing a long delay, ask airline staff if they will pay for meals or a hotel room. While some airlines offer these amenities to passengers, others do not provide any amenities to stranded passengers.”

If a flight is “significantly" delayed, then things start to change a bit. Unfortunately, the Department of Transportation has not put a time limit on how “significantly” is defined. However, the FAA says you may be entitled to a refund in some situations, including a refund for all optional fees associated with the purchase of your ticket (such as baggage fees, seat upgrades, etc.). 

As far as a complete flight “cancellation” goes, things are a bit better for travelers. Here are the things the FAA says you need to know if your flight is canceled:

  • Most airlines will rebook you for free on their next flight to your destination as long as that flight has seats available.

  • If your flight is canceled and you – not the airline – choose to cancel your trip as a result, you are entitled to a refund for the unused transportation – even for non-refundable tickets. You are also entitled to a refund for any bag fee that you paid and any extras you may have purchased, such as a seat assignment.  

  • Some airlines may prefer you to accept a voucher instead of a refund so that they can keep your money. If that happens and you accept the voucher, ask questions about any restrictions that may apply, such as blackout and expiration dates, advanced booking requirements, and limits on the number of seats.

  • What about putting you up in a hotel and giving you money for food or cab fare? The FAA says airlines are not required to provide these things when a flight is canceled. “If your flight is canceled, ask the airline staff if they will pay for meals or a hotel room. While some airlines offer these amenities to passengers, others do not provide any amenities to stranded passengers,” the FAA said.

  • Lastly, an airline “can” put you on another airline’s flight to where you’re going. It’s not a requirement, but if the airline prides itself on good customer service, it doesn’t hurt to politely ask the airline if it will transfer your ticket to another airline that has a flight with available seats. 

As winter storm Landon begins its 2,000-mile journey from Texas through the Northeast, it’s causing thousands of flight cancellations for most of the major...

Article Image

Verizon and AT&T agree to delay 5G rollout to prevent flight cancellations and delays

There’s apparently been a deal cut regarding the chaos that AT&T and Verizon’s new 5G service would create on airplanes' instruments and guidance systems.

As the clock ticked precariously toward the launch of the 5G enhancement, the White House stepped in late Tuesday to referee the situation. It apparently was able to get the telecom companies to agree to delay 5G C-band deployment around key airports and help airlines avoid a rash of potentially canceled flights.

“This agreement will avoid potentially devastating disruptions to passenger travel, cargo operations, and our economic recovery, while allowing more than 90 percent of wireless tower deployment to occur as scheduled,” President Biden said in a statement.

“This agreement protects flight safety and allows aviation operations to continue without significant disruption and will bring more high-speed internet options to millions of Americans. Expanding 5G and promoting competition in internet service are critical priorities of mine, and tomorrow will be a massive step in the right direction.”

The 5G fuss

To some, this issue is a tempest in a teapot. Trade association CTIA – which represents the U.S. wireless communications -- claims that 5G C-band communications operate safely without causing harmful interference to aviation equipment. Putting some numbers to that assertion, it says that nearly 40 countries already use the service with no impact on aviation.

However, the Biden administration is playing it safe. The President said this pause will give the wireless carriers, airlines, and aviation equipment manufacturers an opportunity to work with the Department of Transportation on a safe way to make their 5G hopes a reality. He also stated that his team is already on the case and engaging with all parties.

“At my direction, they will continue to do so until we close the remaining gap and reach a permanent, workable solution around these key airports," Biden said.

Consumers can still get the new 5G service 

AT&T and Verizon may be standing down at the airport, but that doesn't mean consumers won't have access to new 5G services.

AT&T said that its new 5G+ is available in parts of 44 cities in the U.S. as well as in public and private venues like stadiums, arenas, school campuses, hospitals, and concert halls.

Wednesday morning, Verizon stepped aside from the aviation issue to also announce that its new 5G Ultra Wideband network will be available to 100 million more people this month in over 1,700 cities across the U.S.

There’s apparently been a deal cut regarding the chaos that AT&T; and Verizon’s new 5G service would create on airplanes' instruments and guidance systems....

Article Image

Airlines brace for cancellations and delays due to new 5G rollout taking place this week

Over the last few weeks, airlines have been forced to deal with cancellations brought on by pandemic-stricken workers and weather conditions. Now, they’re facing a completely different specter – one brought on by a new 5G service set to be launched this week by AT&T and Verizon.

Airlines first waved the red flag on the issue in December, moving AT&T and Verizon to agree to hold off on 5G deployment until January 20 to help prevent problems within the aviation industry. Now that the launch’s reset is nearing the eleventh hour, major U.S. airlines are doing all they can to bring about another pause.

On Monday, the chief executives of several major U.S. airlines – including American, Delta, Southwest, JetBlue, and United – publicly cautioned that the "vast majority of the traveling and shipping public will essentially be grounded" if the new 5G technology is permitted to begin.

United Airlines separately raised a concern that the issue could affect more than 15,000 of its flights, more than a million passengers, and knot up tons of cargo annually.

FAA agrees with airline officials

Those executives were speaking to the choir at the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). The agency agreed that interference from the 5G rollout could possibly have an impact on flying in low-visibility situations, not to mention affect vital airplane instruments like altimeters. 

“This means that on a day like yesterday, more than 1,100 flights and 100,000 passengers would be subjected to cancellations, diversions or delays,” the agency warned. However, it tried to mollify the airlines by saying that it "will continue to ensure that the traveling public is safe as wireless companies deploy 5G.”

The agency said it continues to work with both the aviation industry and wireless companies to try to find a solution in which 5G-related flight delays and cancellations would be limited.

The impact could also impact deliveries

Shipping giants UPS and FedEx are standing shoulder-to-shoulder with their airline industry brethren on this issue.

"The ripple effects across both passenger and cargo operations, our workforce and the broader economy are simply incalculable,” the carriers said in a letter. “To be blunt, the nation’s commerce will grind to a halt.”

If Wednesday comes and there’s no resolution, consumers and businesses could also be affected. "Immediate intervention is needed to avoid significant operational disruption to air passengers, shippers, supply chain and delivery of needed medical supplies," UPS and FedEx officials concluded.

Over the last few weeks, airlines have been forced to deal with cancellations brought on by pandemic-stricken workers and weather conditions. Now, they’re...

Article Image

Your flight was canceled. Are you entitled to a refund?

Since Christmas Eve, thousands of U.S. flights have been canceled due to bad weather and COVID-19 infections among airline personnel.

An analysis of recent airline reviews posted on ConsumerAffairs shows the extent of the problem and the rising level of frustration among travelers. Alexa, of Rockville, Md., reported a bad experience on American Airlines.

“They canceled my flight on Christmas with less than 10 hours' notice,” Alexa wrote in a ConsumerAffairs review. “I ended up having to get a flight a day later and they said they would give me no compensation for the change in flight.”

Is Alexa entitled to a refund? Here’s what the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) has to say about her situation:

“A passenger is entitled to a refund if the airline canceled a flight, regardless of the reason, and the passenger chooses not to travel.”

Delays sometimes result in refunds

When an airline cancels a flight, it will sometimes offer passengers vouchers for future travel, or in Alexa’s case, schedule them on a later flight. But if the passenger chooses not to travel, then the regulation is very clear – the passenger is entitled to a full refund. Similar rules are also in place for delays.

“Our flight going was delayed with the threat of canceling for 6 hours as if it was a routine event,” Lori, of Oak Park, Calif., wrote in a ConsumerAffairs review of United. “No help at the gate to get on a different flight. The return flight was canceled at the last minute due to no crew.”

Lori would have had a strong case for a refund had she decided not to make her trip. Here’s what the DOT regulation has to say about delays:

“A passenger is entitled to a refund if the airline made a significant schedule change and/or significantly delays a flight and the passenger chooses not to travel.”

The DOT does not define what a “significant” delay is, but a delay of six hours would likely fall into that category. But again, when the passenger accepts whatever accommodation the airline offers and proceeds with the trip, they lose their right to a refund.

In this case, Alexa, Lori, and others who were traveling during the holidays to see friends and family were likely determined to complete the journey despite the obstacles. Making the choice not to travel is the only way to get a refund.

Since Christmas Eve, thousands of U.S. flights have been canceled due to bad weather and COVID-19 infections among airline personnel.An analysis of rec...

Article Image

Southwest Airlines cancels nearly 1,500 flights, stranding travelers across the country

Southwest Airlines may have escaped major cancellations from New Year’s weekend, but it’s in the hot seat now. The discount carrier pulled 658 flights off the board on Thursday, according to FlightAware. Another 519 were canceled on Friday, and there are another 230 cancellations predicted for Saturday and 19 for Sunday.

In an email to ConsumerAffairs, a Southwest spokesperson explained that “ongoing staff challenges” – most likely coronavirus-related sick calls from workers – and weather “disruptions” at major operation locations were the cause of the cancellations. The weather situation isn’t likely to change soon, with winter storm Garrett continuing to create travel problems as it blankets parts of the mid-South and Northeast with snow. 

Southwest doesn’t appear to be the only airline that is canceling flights. United, American, SkyWest, JetBlue, Alaska Airlines, Endeavor, and Delta have canceled 1,078 flights on Friday. FlightAware’s estimates show that United and SkyWest have called off 234 flights on Saturday and another 39 on Sunday. However, those numbers could change quickly because airlines have to shuffle schedules when weather conditions change or workers call in sick.

What travelers can do about canceled flights

While flight cancellations can upset someone’s travel plans, the government has protections in place to keep consumers from losing the price of their tickets.

"In the face of the run of cancellations and delays we’ve been seeing since just before Christmas, the biggest thing passengers need to keep in mind is that, under federal law, if an airport cancels or significantly alters their itinerary and they choose not to fly, they’re owed a full refund in their original form of payment, regardless of the reason for the cancellation or change,” Willis Orlando, Scott’sCheapFlights Senior Product Operations Specialist, told ConsumerAffairs.

Airlines would probably rather have a traveler take a voucher so they don’t lose any hard money, but it’s certainly worth your while to call or text a customer service representative and claim your cash refund if flight cancellations cause you to miss your trip.  

“In terms of when this might end, it’s impossible to predict with Omicron, but we do expect weather permitting, as we get into the second half of January and passenger numbers drop off from their holiday highs, that we should see airlines move into a better position to adjust staffing and schedules to stave off any further mass delays,” Orlando said.

While Southwest has a slew of conditions when it comes to using vouchers, travelers can sometimes be blindsided by a term they didn’t expect. Lynne, of Honolulu, Hawaii, recently told us that she had an unpleasant surprise when booking a new flight. 

“If your Southwest ticket was affected from the pandemic and the expiration date was extended to 9/2022, beware as once you buy a ticket now with your travel funds from the canceled pandemic flight, and then decide that you have to change that ticket, your expiration will be only about 15 days from the day you cancel the new flight,” Lynne wrote in a ConsumerAffairs review.

Southwest Airlines may have escaped major cancellations from New Year’s weekend, but it’s in the hot seat now. The discount carrier pulled 658 flights off...

Article Image

Flight cancellations mount as New Year’s weekend begins

Get ready for another rash of flight cancellations as we enter the New Year’s weekend. According to FlightAware data, JetBlue Airways, United Airlines, Alaska Airlines, Allegiant, Delta Air Lines, SkyWest, and Horizon have all canceled 50 or more flights between Thursday and Saturday.

JetBlue is suffering much of that interruption due to a growing number of coronavirus-related illnesses among its crew members. FlightAware data shows that JetBlue’s current list of cancellations totals 367 through New Year’s Day.

"We expect the number of Covid cases in the northeast -- where most of our crewmembers are based -- to continue to surge for the next week or two," a JetBlue spokesperson told Reuters. "This means there is a high likelihood of additional cancellations until case counts start to come down."

The impact of JetBlue’s cancellations could also be felt in other parts of the country where it has secondary hubs – such as Florida, Virginia, and California. A spokesperson for FlightAware said JetBlue probably won’t be the only airline that will be canceling a large number of flights.

“We would expect to see more delays and possibly more cancellations over the weekend if the thunderstorm weather that is forecast to be an issue in the southeast United States actually happens, and if there is a widespread area of weather,” the spokesperson told ConsumerAffairs. “That area of projected storms could impact Atlanta, which could be problematic especially for Delta Airlines as that’s their main base.”

What cancellations travelers can expect

For a full rundown of flight cancellation data, consumers can view FlightAware’s data here. Below are some of the details that ConsumerAffairs pulled out as of Thursday afternoon. 

Affected Points of Departure

The greatest number of canceled domestic flights on Thursday – 148 – began at Seatac Airport in Seattle. After that, other affected points of departure include Liberty Newark with 48, JFK with 40, and Orlando, Boston, and Ft. Lauderdale with 34 each.

Friday cancellations are similar, but Denver International rises to the top of the list with 69 cancellations. There has also been a spike in cancellations at Houston Bush International (17) and Chicago O’Hare (13).

It’s probably too early to tell how Saturday will eventually play out, but New Year's Day cancellations for origin airports are currently led by Liberty Newark (14), JFK (8), and Los Angeles’ LAX (8).

Affected Destinations

As far as destination airports are concerned, Seattle’s Seatac leads the way with 141 cancellations. It’s followed by Newark with 60, Los Angeles’ LAX with 45, and Denver with 40.

For Friday, Denver moves into the top spot with 62 cancellations. It’s followed by Newark with 38, Seattle with 37, Boston Logan with 26, JFK with 25, Ft. Lauderdale with 23, and Houston Bush with 22.

Domestic U.S. cancellations for Saturday are too early to predict accurately, but Denver, Newark, and JFK all listed 16 cancellations apiece on Thursday afternoon. 

Get ready for another rash of flight cancellations as we enter the New Year’s weekend. According to FlightAware data, JetBlue Airways, United Airlines, Ala...

Article Image

Delta Air Lines shines in recent study of carriers with the best customer service

Even though air travel is beginning to return to its pre-pandemic numbers, the issues airlines are running into with COVID-19 requirements, unseasonable weather, and labor shortages have put the aviation industry in a tough spot when it comes to catering to customers.

In a recent data story, UpgradedPoints examined how travelers feel about the service they’re receiving, with researchers comparing monthly averages for complaints, canceled flights, and mishandled baggage.

The best and worst carriers for customer service

Delta Air Lines subsidiary Endeavor Air took home the prize for the airline with the best customer service, with an overall score of 83.94 points. Delta Air Lines by itself also had a good showing, with a second-place customer service score of 75.77 points. 

The third-place airline was another regional carrier like Endeavor – SkyWest Airlines. Notably, the company’s customer service was put to the test just this week when hundreds of its flights were canceled. 

When it came to the airlines with the worst customer service scores, the last place finisher with a score of 29.06 was Frontier Airlines. The company continues to collect concerning comments from ConsumerAffairs reviewers. 

“Worst customer service ever. [The] price to cancel is $79. Even if you try to change your flight, [the] same price [is] $79,” wrote Rocky from Jensen Beach, Fla. in a ConsumerAffairs post. “What a joke. If you can avoid booking/flying with this airline you will be doing yourself a huge favor.”

JetBlue was close to being the big loser. Its total score was only 3 points higher than Frontier’s, at 32.64 overall. 

Canceled flights and mishandled baggage scores

Delta Air Lines earned some bonus points in the study by scoring first and second (with Endeavor) in the lowest percentage of canceled flights. The worst airline, according to the study, was Hawaiian Airlines. 

When it came to taking good care of a traveler’s bags, Allegiant beat out the competition by only mishandling 1.52 bags per 1,000 over an average month. UpgradedPoints’ Alex Miller says American Airlines lies on the other end of that spectrum. 

“No one mishandles bags like American, which is present in every single one of the top 5 spots [with its regional partners] here,” he wrote. “In fact, American mishandles approximately 30,262 bags per month, or about 7.37 bags per every 1,000. If you lump American in with Envoy and PSA? That number reaches 39,704, or 6.66 bags per every 1,000.”

Even though air travel is beginning to return to its pre-pandemic numbers, the issues airlines are running into with COVID-19 requirements, unseasonable we...

Article Image

Thousands of flights canceled due to spike in Omicron variant cases

Thousands of flights were canceled as we entered the Christmas weekend, and anyone who flew and actually made it to their destination should feel lucky. However, they’ll need even more luck getting home because the list of cancellations started growing again on Monday morning. 

According to FlightAware, there were 7,690 delays and 2,523 cancellations by noon on Monday – growing at a rate of about 4% an hour.

Airlines are pinning most of the blame on the continued spread of the COVID-19 Omicron variant, which is forcing some airline workers to stay home. A United Airlines memo reviewed by CNN stated that the “nationwide spike in Omicron cases this week has had a direct impact on our flight crews and the people who run our operation.”

CNN reports that Lufthansa plans to cancel 10% of its winter schedule – or 33,000 individual flights – because of the pandemic’s impact on the aviation industry.

Cancellations continue to grow

At the top of the “most canceled” list is SkyWest Airlines, with 249 Monday cancellations. SkyWest is a partner of Delta Air Lines, American Airlines, United Airlines, and Alaska Airlines that typically takes passengers from major hubs to smaller markets.

“SkyWest teams are working to recover after weather impacting several hubs, as well as increased COVID cases and quarantines amongst crewmembers, have resulted in higher than normal flight cancels through the weekend and today,” the airline said in a statement emailed to ConsumerAffairs. “We apologize for the inconvenience and are working to resume normal operations as quickly as possible.”

The list of cancellations is already getting bigger. FlightAware data shows that 826 flights have already been canceled for Tuesday; more than 200 have also been canceled for Wednesday.

Adding to travelers’ woes is the potential for bad weather between now and the end of the week. Western U.S. states are already getting hit by winter storm Elmer, and there’s a likelihood of major storms – and even tornadoes – forecast for the south-central U.S. going into the New Year’s weekend. 

Thousands of flights were canceled as we entered the Christmas weekend, and anyone who flew and actually made it to their destination should feel lucky. Ho...

Article Image

Airline officials express concerns over flight disruptions tied to 5G service

Airlines are waving the caution flag on 5G service, fearing that when the wireless service gets updated in January 2022, it could create extensive flight delays in situations like snowstorms and low visibility. 

The reason? Officials say the new wireless signals could hamper the effectiveness of equipment on planes and helicopters used to track aircraft altitude.

Billions lost in flight disruptions

With a Jan. 5 launch day looming, the White House, industry groups, and aviation regulators are rushing to come to some form of agreement. To help out, AT&T and Verizon have offered power reductions in their new 5G services, but the aviation industry says those cuts are “inadequate.”

Aviation trade group Airlines for America says the 5G conflict could cost as much as $2.1 billion in flight disruptions. 

“If you were to ask us what our number one concern is in the near term, it is the deployment of 5G,” Southwest Airlines’ Chief Executive Officer Gary Kelly said in testimony given at a Senate hearing earlier this month. 

Unfounded fears?

While many airline officials continue to worry about this issue, some people in the wireless industry say fears about 5G are completely unfounded.

“The aviation industry’s fear-mongering relies on completely discredited information and deliberate distortions of fact,” Nick Ludlum, a senior vice president at the trade group CTIA, which includes AT&T and Verizon as members, told Bloomberg News. “5G operates safely and without causing harmful interference to aviation operations in nearly 40 countries around the world,” Ludlum said. “U.S. airlines fly in and out of these countries every day.”

Only weeks ago, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) was concerned about interference from the 5G wireless spectrum, but it now believes the expansion of 5G and aviation can safely co-exist.

“Today, we took an important step toward that goal by issuing two airworthiness directives to provide a framework and to gather more information to avoid potential effects on aviation safety equipment,” the agency said in a statement. “The FAA is working closely with the Federal Communications Commission and wireless companies, and has made progress toward safely implementing the 5G expansion. We are confident with ongoing collaboration we will reach this shared goal.”

Airlines are waving the caution flag on 5G service, fearing that when the wireless service gets updated in January 2022, it could create extensive flight d...

Article Image

Experts warn holiday travelers about crowded airports and roadways

Forecasts from a variety of travel watchers suggest that travelers hoping to go somewhere this week need to be more prepared for more delays than they have in the past couple of years.  

Overall, the American Automobile Association (AAA) and Inrix state that there will be 109 million people on the road or in the skies this year. That’s 34% higher than last year, accounting for an additional 27.7 million travelers. That won’t quite get us all the way back to where we were before the pandemic, but the study said travel volume will reach 92% of 2019’s levels.

Much of that increase will come from travelers who will fly rather than drive somewhere. AAA and Inrix stated that the airline industry will see a 184% increase from last holiday season. For a full breakdown of the best times to travel by day, check out Inrix’s forecast here.

Hit the road early, but get your car checked out before you leave

With such a dramatic increase, travelers who want to stay clear of the rush should try to hit the road early. Inrix stated that some major metro areas could see three times as many delays, and AAA said it expects to respond to as many as 917,000 calls for help. 

AAA added that if a vehicle hasn’t been inspected lately, then it would be smart for travelers to have someone take a look under the hood as a safety precaution.

“Vehicles that have been driven less during the pandemic should get an inspection to check key components like the battery, fuel system, tires, brakes and fluid levels to avoid an unnecessary breakdown,” a spokesperson for AAA said. “It’s important to do this as early as possible in case there is an issue that needs to be fixed.”

COVID-19 requirements complicate travel plans

Travelers also need to be prepared for the ever-changing landscape of COVID-19 stipulations. Not only has the White House set out new requirements, but the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s travel requisites can also change like the wind.

“These large crowds, combined with ever-evolving Covid-related rules mean travelers should really be prepared for some turbulence as they get ready to head to the airport this year. Long check-in lines, particularly for international flights, are to be expected,” Willis Orlando, Scott’s Cheap Flights’ Senior Product Operations Specialist, told ConsumerAffairs. “Airline agents are tasked with confirming Covid-related documentation prior to checking folks in, which means that lines that used to be relatively quick are very likely to take quite a bit longer.”

Airlines may bump passengers

Ever since COVID-19 jumped into the pilot’s seat, buying an airline ticket has come with a new set of risks – one that will probably linger during the holidays. Experts say staffing shortages, overbookings, and cancellations may lead some airlines to bump passengers out of flights.

The top 5 offenders, according to tracking data provided by UpgradedPoints, are a mix of smaller airlines and regional/feeder airlines that get passengers from smaller towns to larger hubs. They include:

  1. Envoy Air (a subsidiary of American Airlines), which bumped an average of 6.88 passengers per 100,000 between the start of 2020 to September 2021. 

  2. Frontier Airlines came in second with 3.73 involuntary denied boardings. 

  3. PSA Airlines (also a subsidiary of American) followed close behind in third with 3.06 bumps per 100,000 passengers. 

  4. Horizon Air (a subsidiary of Alaska Airlines) came in at fourth, with 2.37 denied bookings per 100,000 passengers.

  5. Republic Airlines (an operator of regional flights for American, United, and Delta) rounded out the Top 5, with 2.05 denied boardings per 100,000 passengers.

“If you're traveling with Delta, JetBlue, United, or Allegiant, you can rest assured that you won't be bumped from your flight this holiday travel season,” a spokesperson for UpgradePoints told ConsumerAffairs. “These airlines were the least likely offenders on the list." 

If there’s any sort of issue, such as getting bumped from an overbooked flight,  passengers can expect longer-than-usual waits for customer service. “Our best advice is to check your flight status frequently ahead of time on the airline’s website, so that if you are faced with any schedule changes, you can get out ahead of them,” Orlando said.

“If you don’t need to check a bag, don’t. That’s just one fewer line you’ll have to deal with at the airport. And if you do find yourself needing to contact customer service, check to see if your airline offers a text message option via their mobile app. Many do, and it can be much more convenient, and less stressful, than sitting on hold.”

Forecasts from a variety of travel watchers suggest that travelers hoping to go somewhere this week need to be more prepared for more delays than they have...

Article Image

United Airlines opens pop-up store selling one-way tickets for $49

With holiday shipping deadlines tightening by the day, United Airlines has decided it could take a little stress off the shoulders of gift-givers by offering a gift that doesn't need expedited shipping – one-way fares starting at $49. The airline is also giving its rewards members a good deal by offering awards trips starting at 4,900 miles.

However, there are two “buts” that consumers need to pay attention to, and they’re big ones. First, travelers need to understand that these fares “start at” $49 and don’t account for taxes and fees. Secondly, the window on this deal closes at midnight on December 14. 

United’s hubs – Newark, Chicago, Houston, Los Angeles, Denver, Washington D.C., and San Francisco – get the bulk of the best prices, but even small markets like Lincoln, Nebraska, and Huntsville, Alabama, have hard-to-beat fares. 

Flights starting at $49

When ConsumerAffairs jumped into United’s reservation system for this deal, here’s what we found for flights using January 12, 2022, as the day of departure.

For $49 each way: routes include Cincinnati to Washington D.C. and Nashville to Chicago.

For $69 one way: routes include Boise to Los Angeles and Atlanta to Houston.

If you’re willing to pay more but still get a good deal: United has $139 one-way fares from places like Ft. Myers to San Francisco and Washington D.C. to Phoenix.

Can travelers expect more deals to come soon?

It’s too early to know if these kinds of deals will continue to be offered, but others may follow suit now that United has thrown down the $49 gauntlet. 

“When it comes to domestic and short-haul international routes, we're living in a ridiculously competitive fare environment, which can only be good news for travelers,” Willis Orlando at Scott’s Cheap Flights told ConsumerAffairs. “What's even better is that we can expect to see other full-service airlines respond to these cut-rate fares with bargain fares of their own.”

Orlando cited a recent example from Alaska Airlines, which offered flights to Hawaii from certain West Coast cities for $123 roundtrip. That prompted American, Delta, and Hawaiian Airlines to react with deals of their own to Hawaii. The bottom line is this: If you’re looking for a good deal on airfare, watch airline sites like a hawk and be prepared to move quickly. 

“We'd expect to see much of the same with these highly in-demand domestic routes this week,” Orlando said. “So if you're a Delta or American loyalist, standby, your deal is probably on the way within days if not hours.”

With holiday shipping deadlines tightening by the day, United Airlines has decided it could take a little stress off the shoulders of gift-givers by offeri...

Article Image

Consumers may see higher prices as airlines prepare for holiday season and 2022

Airlines around the world are finally getting to enjoy life in the air again. With international flight restrictions eased and vaccinated passengers feeling good about their health safety, it’s all systems go for the holidays and 2022. 

While airlines have handed out great fares as a lure to get consumers back in the air after 20 months of pandemic fits and starts, will they jack up the prices again? The easy answer is yes. Most experts agree that prices will go up because of demand, but demand alone isn’t what’s pushing the price of a ticket up. 

For one thing, the rising cost of jet fuel is another factor. Right before the COVID-19 pandemic started to kick in, U.S. jet fuel prices were at $1.52 per gallon. As of Monday, jet fuel is selling at $2.27 per gallon, the highest it’s been since 2014.

Airlines are also feverishly trying to hire all the employees they can to effectively staff flights. United is hiring 25,000 people, and understaffing issues have caused both American Airlines and Southwest Airlines to suffer disruptions and cancellations.

Consumer shares a cautionary tale

The employment situation at airlines has also made life difficult for travelers who need to make a change to their trip. You only have to look as far as ConsumerAffairs reviews to find a good cautionary tale. 

In a recent review of American Airlines, Kevin of Sykesville, Md., said he booked a flight for Feb. 2022 a couple of months ago that had changed when he checked in on it recently. 

“To my horror they changed the home airport from Baltimore to Philadelphia and from Saturday to Friday. They also changed the return flight from Mazatlán to BWI to Phoenix to BWI. I guess they expect me to drive 20 hours to get to the Phoenix airport. No messages or emails were ever sent from the airlines to notify me of this ridiculous change. I even double checked my SPAM folder,” Kevin said.

Kevin thought the easiest way to fix the issue was to go on American’s website and change his flight. He described how frustrating it was to try to talk to someone at the company.

“Nope, I can't change my flight online and have to call. I call and they give me the standard ‘Wait times are longer than usual’. Again, no big deal. However, then a message comes on telling me my wait time will be NO LESS than 4 hours,” he said.

“They tell me live Chat is available on the mobile app so I download that. I get on a chat and have been disconnected 3x forcing me to repeat the same info. I currently have been on chats for more than 90 min and they just told me no flights are available and to call reservations. I see cheaper and shorter flight times available by American as I am chatting, but I don’t want to double book and not get refunded. I don't know if it is just me, but this whole thing is out of control.” 

Kevin’s story illustrates just how important it is for consumers to stay on top of their flight details. As always, you can read more reviews about airlines on ConsumerAffairs to help you make the best travel decisions.

Airlines around the world are finally getting to enjoy life in the air again. With international flight restrictions eased and vaccinated passengers feelin...

Article Image

American Airlines pilots union rejects holiday pay incentives

The board of American Airlines’ pilots union, the Allied Pilots Association (APA), has collectively rejected a proposal from the airline that included pay incentives for pilots if they worked peak-period days around the Thanksgiving, Christmas, and New Year’s holidays. 

The proposal that American offered was 50% additional pay for any flying done on peak period days and for work performed by Check Airmen (CKA), which are aircraft pilots who perform an oversight, safety, and qualification role for commercial pilots undergoing evaluation. Premium flights and CKA overtime days would be paid at 100% overtime pay. 

The union said it considered all aspects of the proposed deal, but it wound up voting 20-0 to reject it. 

“While understanding that its rejection creates a disparity among our fellow work groups that have accepted management’s proffered incentives, the Board concluded that the need to achieve meaningful permanent improvements in a new collective bargaining agreement must remain APA’s focus,” the union said in a statement.

Navigating contract negotiations

The incentive offer comes at a time when many airlines are scrambling to keep up with staffing issues amid a renewed demand in travel brought about by the U.S. lifting international travel restrictions. 

But, for American, it also comes at a time when the airline and its union are in the middle of contract negotiations. The APA says airline management has been dragging its feet for months on proposals it made regarding quality-of-life concerns and sustainable solutions to improve operational integrity.

American disagrees. Despite the cancellation of more than 2,000 flights at the beginning of November and a grievance filed by flight attendants over accommodations between flights, the company thinks it deserves some recognition for its offer. Officials say it would have tripled the pay for flight attendants who fly trips over the holidays and provided $1,000 holiday attendance bonuses to ramp workers and mechanics. 

“We are, of course, disappointed, especially since we have holiday pay programs in place for all other frontline groups at the company,” said Kimball Stone and Chip Long, American’s senior vice presidents of flight operations.

“But we will continue to look for opportunities to work with APA to support you during the holidays, as well as explore our options to maximize availability of existing premiums” under the collective bargaining agreement. The pilots’ contract still allows for the company to assign 150% pay to certain trips when staffing is tight.

The board of American Airlines’ pilots union, the Allied Pilots Association (APA), has collectively rejected a proposal from the airline that included pay...

Article Image

FAA sends disruptive passenger cases to FBI for criminal review

The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has decided that it’s had enough of unruly passengers on airlines. The agency has asked the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) to step in and handle 37 of the most serious unruly passenger cases it has had to deal with in recent months. The action is part of a new information-sharing protocol that the two agencies will use to review and prosecute incidents more quickly.

Even though the FAA saw a reduction in the number of instances after it launched its Zero Tolerance campaign and fined hundreds of passengers for acting up on flights, it still feels even a single incident is one too many. 

In addition to getting the FBI involved, the agency said it no longer will address unruly passenger cases with warnings or counseling. Instead, it will turn up the heat by “pursuing legal enforcement action against any passenger who assaults, threatens, intimidates, or interferes with airline crew members.” 

“Let this serve both as a warning and a deterrent: If you disrupt a flight, you risk not just fines from the FAA but federal criminal prosecution as well,” FAA Administrator Stephen Dickson said Thursday in a news release.

Adding even more muscle

The FAA is also adding some extra muscle in the way of fines to try to curb bad behavior. In the past, the agency fined unruly passengers up to $25,000 per incident. Going forward, those fines are now set at up to $37,000 for each violation.

Flight attendants -- who have had to deal with the brunt of unruly passenger disruptions -- are also asking for more help. AFA-CWA International, a flight attendants association, has been trying to persuade airlines, airports, and federal authorities to go as far as creating and sharing a list of violators and denying those travelers permission to fly via any airline.

“The vitriol, verbal and physical abuse from a small group of passengers - yet at a steady rate - is unacceptable and puts everyone onboard at risk. This is not a new normal we are willing to accept. The federal government, airlines and airports must redouble efforts to hold every disruptive passenger accountable,” the association said in a Facebook post.

The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has decided that it’s had enough of unruly passengers on airlines. The agency has asked the Federal Bureau of Inv...

Article Image

United Airlines to cut service to three cities and pull back service to a fourth

To try to regain its footing coming out of the pandemic, United Airlines is dropping three small U.S. cities from its flight schedule and pulling back on service to another.

Over the weekend, the airline filed plans to pull out of Pierre, S.D., Watertown, S.D., and Twin Falls, Idaho, over the next two months. According to a report by ThePointsGuy, Pierre’s service will cease on Jan. 3, 2022. Flights in and out of Twin Falls will end on Nov. 30, 2021, and service to Watertown will stop on Jan. 3, 2022.

United will also end service to Joplin, Mo., out of Houston, Texas, later this month, but there will continue to be flights into Joplin from other markets, mostly Chicago. SkyWest told ThePointsGuy that demand patterns were the reason for the cut.

Flights to small markets continue to shift

The two airports in South Dakota qualify as Essential Air Service (EAS) markets, meaning that the federal government provides subsidies to a chosen airline to guarantee service to these cities. By opting out of service to those cities, United may be leaving a pile of cash on the table. 

ThePointsGuy reported that a total of $7 million had been awarded to Skywest Airlines, United’s service partner on those routes. However, that contract expired in April 2021, and United continued those routes without government funding. 

When the Department of Transportation solicited proposals from carriers interested in providing service to these markets, United decided not to submit one. However, Colorado-based Denver Air Connection stepped in and won the contract, albeit at $2 million less than United was getting.

Pulling out of more cities and eliminating certain flight options in the heart of the U.S. may ultimately impact United’s standing with consumers. Frederick of Watkinsville, Ga., recently told ConsumerAffairs that the carrier canceled his flight and wasn’t able to provide other options. 

“United cancelled a leg of our return trip, stranding us in the middle of the country. They offered no alternative flights, even from three other major airports in the region. We incurred significant out-of-pocket expenses to return home on time,” they wrote in a ConsumerAffairs review.

To try to regain its footing coming out of the pandemic, United Airlines is dropping three small U.S. cities from its flight schedule and pulling back on s...

Article Image

American Airlines cancels nearly 2,000 flights over Halloween weekend

Tens of thousands of travelers hoping to get somewhere on American Airlines over the weekend went nowhere fast. The airline canceled 1,730 flights from Friday through Sunday -- 22.9% of its scheduled take-offs -- according to FlightAware.

"To make sure we are taking care of our customers and providing scheduling certainty for our crews, we have adjusted our operation for the last few days this month by proactively canceling some flights," David Seymour, the airline's chief operating officer, said in a memo to employees.

Last month, Southwest Airlines also suffered a spate of cancellations and actually eclipsed American Airlines’ total cancellations for October. It was a problem that a Southwest pilots union put on the shoulders of airline officials for choosing “profits over people.”

Help is on the way -- or is it?

American says travelers shouldn’t give up on the airline. According to Seymour, 1,800 flight attendants are expected to return from pandemic time-off starting Monday Another 600 new hires are planned by the end of the year in hopes of closing all the workforce gaps in time for the holidays.

However, those 1,800 returns aren’t a guarantee, and American still has to make up the deficit of workers created when it temporarily furloughed more than 10,000 workers after funding and ticket sales dried up during the pandemic. While the airline reversed the furlough, thousands of employees decided to take the cash incentives and voluntarily quit their jobs instead. 

The pilots union at American warned that it could also face a different staffing shortage if it implements a COVID-19 vaccine mandate. However, in trying to find a win-win, the union has suggested that both the airline and government officials consider an alternative means of complying with the White House’s mandate, including regular testing or proof of natural immunity.

American isn’t alone in this quandary. United Airlines pilots are threatening to stay at home if they’re forced to fly with unvaccinated coworkers. Six United employees who applied for a medical or religious exemption to the airline’s vaccine mandate are doing their best to haul the airline into court where a judge can decide whether or not the company has the right to place them on leave for refusing to be vaccinated.

Tens of thousands of travelers hoping to get somewhere on American Airlines over the weekend went nowhere fast. The airline canceled 1,730 flights from Fri...

Article Image

Airlines prepare for barrage of international travelers as U.S. reopens borders

Now that the U.S. has finalized plans to accept vaccinated international travelers into the country, airlines are girding themselves for what Delta Air Lines CEO Ed Bastian called an “onslaught of travel all at once.” 

The airlines don’t have much time to prepare either. The new mandate goes into effect on Monday, Nov. 8. 

There are several layers to what airlines will now be counted on to process. The updated to-do list calls for carriers to not only make sure a person has proof of vaccination, but they also have to: 

  • Match names and dates of birth to confirm the passenger is the same person reflected on the proof of vaccination

  • Determine that the record was issued by an official source in the country where the vaccine was given

  • Confirm where the passenger got their vaccinations, which ones they received, etc.

How big is the surge?

The return to travel is already starting to develop. According to data from the Transportation Security Administration (TSA), inbound U.S. travel is close to completely rebounding from pre-pandemic levels. On Monday, nearly 2 million people passed through security checkpoints operated at U.S. airports. That’s more than double the number of travelers from a year ago, and it’s nearly 300,000 less than the same period in 2019.

Hopper -- a company that uses ​​predictive analytics to offer consumers an advantage in finding affordable flights -- said searches for all inbound international U.S. flights have spiked by 32% since the White House’s announcement. That’s a 21% increase above the weekly average. 

The real eye-opening statistic in Hopper’s analysis is the number of round-trip flights being searched for from Europe to the U.S. The company says those searches have gone up by 133% since the announcement, marking a 70% increase over the weekly average. It’s the biggest increase Hopper says it’s seen on this particular segment this year. 

Things could be a little sloppy at first

Speaking at the Future of Travel Mobility conference, Bastain warned that processing all those additional travelers will be “a bit sloppy at first. There will be lines, unfortunately,” he said.

Bastian should know. Delta’s largest hub is Atlanta Hartsfield, which also happens to be the busiest airport in the world. He believes airlines will likely lean on technology in order to keep up with the new demand. In Delta’s situation, he said the company has developed an app to help travelers navigate the new list of rules.

Now that the U.S. has finalized plans to accept vaccinated international travelers into the country, airlines are girding themselves for what Delta Air Lin...

Article Image

Boeing discovers new defects in its Dreamliner 787

Boeing’s headaches are moving from its 737 jets to its Dreamliner 787 model. The aviation manufacturer admitted on Thursday that some titanium components designed for the 787 were improperly manufactured over the past three years. 

“While our investigation is ongoing, we have determined that this does not present an immediate safety of flight concern for the active in-service fleet,” the company said. Nonetheless, it has notified the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) just to make sure everything is on the up and up.

Those titanium parts were manufactured for Boeing by a third-party supplier -- Italy-based Leonardo SpA. That company, in turn, purchased the items from Brindisi-based Manufacturing Processes Specification (MPS). In a statement, Leonardo says MPS was a qualified Boeing supplier -- one it’s no longer working with. 

The components in question include fittings designed to secure the floor beam in one section of the fuselage, as well as fittings, spacers, brackets, and clips in other areas of the plane.

Finding the aircraft with suspect components

Boeing said any undelivered planes will be modified to specifications, and any 787 that’s currently in service will go through a review process with Boeing first. After that, the aircraft will have to receive the all-clear from the FAA.

The company is working to determine how many planes contain the defective part, but that could take some time because there are an estimated 864 Dreamliners currently in service. Most of those are flown by All Nippon Airways (74) and United Airlines (60). Other carriers that have the planes in their fleets include Japan Airlines (47), American Airlines (45), Etihad Airways (39), Hainan Airlines (38), Air Canada (37), Qatar Airways (37), British Airways (32), and Air India (27).

Boeing says it’s got its act together now

The last few years have been anything but good for Boeing. Not only did it suffer credibility issues over widespread problems with its 737 Max planes, but the 787 has had its own share of issues. 

In 2019, it was rated as one of the safest aircraft in the sky, only to have whistleblowers question its safety months later. In 2020, Boeing announced that three separate flaws found on its 787 Dreamliner aircraft may require further inspections to check for safety.

In Boeing’s mind, that was then and this is now. The company claims it has its act back on the right path. “When issues are raised, that is an indication that these efforts are working,” the company said.

Boeing’s headaches are moving from its 737 jets to its Dreamliner 787 model. The aviation manufacturer admitted on Thursday that some titanium components d...

Article Image

Southwest cancellations continue by the dozens following weekend issues

There doesn’t seem to be an end in sight for Southwest Airlines’ (SWA) cancellation woes. The domino effect that began over the weekend, then spilled over into Monday, is continuing on Tuesday. 

According to FlightAware, Southwest canceled 435 flights on Monday -- 12% of its total scheduled departures -- and delayed 1,524 of its arrivals, a 42% hit. For Tuesday, the numbers look a little better, with 89 cancellations and 242 delays as of late morning. For the year, Southwest’s total cancellations total 2,022 (7.6%) and its delayed arrivals come to 7,084 (28.9%).

What destinations are impacted?

Travelers with flights starting out West look to be impacted the most, with 90 Southwest flights from California to Colorado canceled from late Monday through Tuesday.

Using FlightAware data, ConsumerAffairs counted 25 Southwest cancellations out of Harry Reid International Airport (LAS) in Las Vegas since Monday evening. Others include 12 cancellations at Bob Hope Airport (BUR) in Burbank; 11 at Denver International (DEN); 10 at Chicago Midway (MDW); 9 from Phoenix Sky Harbor (PHX); 7 from Baltimore-Washington (BWI), San Jose (SJC), Sacramento (SMF), San Diego (SAN), and Oakland (OAK); 6 from Love Field (DAL) in Dallas; and 5 from Los Angeles International (LAX).

Pilots union says Southwest’s operation is “brittle”

When this news first broke, Southwest tried to place some of the blame on the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and air traffic issues. The FAA countered by saying there had been no air traffic-related cancellations since Friday. The agency also noted that if any airlines were experiencing delays, it was due to aircraft and crews being out of place.

The Southwest pilots union (SWAPA) is ramping up the blame game even further, calling Southwest’s troubles “another operational meltdown.” 

“There are false claims of job actions by Southwest Pilots currently gaining traction on social media and making their way into mainstream news. I can say with certainty that there are no work slowdowns or sickouts either related to the recent mandatory vaccine mandate or otherwise,” union leadership wrote.

Furthermore, SWAPA called Southwest out for claiming that the immediate causes of the airline’s meltdown were staffing at Jacksonville Center and weather in the southeast U.S. The organization said the weather and staffing issues in Jacksonville were true to some extent, but it asked why these problems were nothing more than a “minor temporary event” for other airlines but devastating to Southwest.

“[It’s] because our operation has become brittle and subject to massive failures under the slightest pressure,” the union said, answering its own question. “Our operation and our frontline employees have endured continuous and unending disruptions since the first time our airline made headlines in early June due to widespread IT failures. Our Pilots are tired and frustrated because our operation is running on empty due to a lack of support from the Company.”

“SWAPA has grave concerns about the direction Southwest Airlines has taken in putting profits ahead of people. Enough is enough.”

There doesn’t seem to be an end in sight for Southwest Airlines’ (SWA) cancellation woes. The domino effect that began over the weekend, then spilled over...

Article Image

Southwest’s weekend flight disruptions and cancellations boil over into new week

Southwest Airlines canceled or delayed close to 2,000 flights over the weekend and is beginning the week with close to 10% of its flights canceled as of late Monday morning. When everything was added up, FoxNews reported that Southwest had canceled 808 flights and had 1,187 flights delayed on Saturday, then another 1,018 flights canceled and 597 flights delayed on Sunday.

The airline put the onus for the cancellations on three things: bad weather, air traffic control problems, and staffing issues. Southwest pointed the finger at the pandemic for the snowballing issues, telling CNN that getting operations back to normal was "more difficult and prolonged" because of schedule and staffing reductions made during the COVID-19 upheaval.

"We've continued diligent work throughout the weekend to reset our operation with a focus on getting aircraft and crews repositioned to take care of our customers," the airline said in a statement.

The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) countered Southwest on the air traffic issue. The agency told CNN that there have been no air traffic-related cancellations since Friday, and it said if any airlines are experiencing delays, it’s due to aircraft and crews being out of place.

"Flight delays and cancellations occurred for a few hours Friday afternoon due to widespread severe weather, military training and limited staffing in one area of the Jacksonville Air Route Traffic Control Center," the FAA said.

Were other airlines impacted in the same way?

By all accounts, Southwest may be the only airline that’s enduring a large volume of flight delays and cancellations. According to CNN and FlightAware, other airlines experienced far fewer issues. On Sunday, American Airlines and Southwest’s low-budget competitor Spirit canceled only 2% of their flights.

However, staffing issues aren't just a Southwest issue. Other airlines have felt the pinch, and that likely has raised the frustration levels of travelers. One industry analyst warns travelers that hiring is a problematic task for airlines, especially given the layoffs and revenue hits the industry took during the pandemic.

“The shortage in labor across the industry could place travel providers at risk of not being able to bring back capacity fast enough to meet demand, which could lead to a loss in revenue,” Jason Guggenheim, Boston Consulting Group’s global head of travel, told Skift. Guggenheim was then asked why airlines can’t fix this labor supply-and-demand disconnect by simply offering higher wages? He said it’s not that simple.

“Travel companies are and will pay more to bring back the right amount of labor, but demand is still volatile and so ensuring they bring back labor thoughtfully is critical for their cost structure and ability to generate positive margins and cash flows,” Guggenheim said. “Almost every travel company has a weaker balance sheet now relative to pre-pandemic, placing a greater emphasis on producing positive cash flow and slowly reducing the burden of a weakened balance sheet.”

Southwest Airlines canceled or delayed close to 2,000 flights over the weekend and is beginning the week with close to 10% of its flights canceled as of la...

Article Image

United Airlines lays off hundreds of workers for refusing to get vaccinated

In the push-come-to-shove over vaccination mandates, United Airlines did what it said it would do. On Tuesday, it laid its unvaccinated workers off.

All told, 600 employees were affected -- about 1% of United’s workforce. The other 99% provided proof of vaccination prior to a Monday deadline. The airline is offering the non-compliant workers one last chance to comply with the mandate or face full termination. A separate 3% of the company’s 67,000 employees sought a medical or religious exemption.

“This was an incredibly difficult decision but keeping our team safe has always been our first priority,” United Airlines CEO Scott Kirby and President Brett Hart wrote in a memo to employees on Tuesday. “Our rationale for requiring the vaccine for all United’s U.S.-based employees was simple — to keep our people safe — and the truth is this: everyone is safer when everyone is vaccinated, and vaccine requirements work.”

The company said the mandate has created a spike in job applications from people who supposedly are vaccinated and want to work in an environment with like-minded people.

Will the other airlines join United?

So far, United is the only major U.S. airline to go as far as firing employees who refuse to abide by a vaccine requirement. Others appear to be taking a softer stance. American and Southwest are simply encouraging employees to get their shot, and Delta Air Lines laid down a levy of $200 for every month its unvaccinated employees didn’t meet the requirement. Southwest is also offering an enticement of two days' pay to workers who show proof of being fully vaccinated by Nov. 15.

As of late last week, the Washington Post reported that vaccination mandates with some other domestic airlines looked like this:

Alaska Airlines: The latest report says 75% of Alaska’s employees are vaccinated. Unvaccinated workers are not eligible for any special coronavirus-related pay if they become exposed or if an infection prevents them from reporting to work. Those people will also have to take part in a vaccine education program. 

Frontier Airlines: Frontier employees have until Oct. 1 to get vaccinated. If they don’t, they’ll be required to show proof of a negative test.

Hawaiian Airlines: The airline’s U.S.-based employees have until Nov. 1 to show proof of vaccination. Those who got the green light for a medical or religious exemption will be required to have regular tests.

In the push-come-to-shove over vaccination mandates, United Airlines did what it said it would do. On Tuesday, it laid its unvaccinated workers off.All...

Article Image

United Airline faces record fine for repeatedly breaking tarmac delay rules

The U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) has handed down a record-breaking fine to United Airlines for repeatedly violating the tarmac delay rule. The airline is being forced to pay $1.9 million for its transgressions and has been given a stern warning not to cross the line again.

It appears the Department’s Office of Aviation Consumer Protection (OACP) has had its eye on United for a while. Regulators found that 20 of the company’s domestic flights and five of its international flights in recent years remained on the tarmac for a lengthy period of time without providing passengers an opportunity to deplane. 

What consumers should know about the tarmac rule

There are all sorts of things that can keep an airplane stuck on the tarmac and delay take-off -- weather, traffic, mechanical issues, security threats, and delays in getting crew members aboard being the usual culprits. If you ever get stuck in a tarmac delay, you have rights as a consumer. Here are some basics you should know:

How long can an airline keep passengers on a departing flight before it is required to start moving the airplane to a location where passengers can safely get off? “For flights departing from a U.S. airport, airlines with more than 30 passenger seats are required to begin to move the airplane to a location where passengers can safely get off before 3 hours for domestic flights and 4 hours for international flights,” is the DOT rule. However, one ConsumerAffairs reviewer intimated that the three-hour rule might be longer than it sensibly should be. 

“89 degrees in the plane and we have been sitting here for 2 hours and another 30 mins or more possibly. What makes it tough is that it is 89 degrees in the plane, lots of kids that are getting dehydrated and so am I. Water or anything is not forthcoming. What a service!,” E of Merritt Island, Florida, said in their review of United.

How long can an airline keep passengers on an arriving flight without providing an opportunity to get off of the airplane? “For flights landing at U.S. airports, airlines are required to provide passengers with an opportunity to safely get off of the airplane before 3 hours for domestic flights and 4 hours for international flights,” the DOT states.

However, there are exceptions to these requirements. The #1 exception to the time limit is for safety, security, or air traffic control-related reasons. The DOT says passengers should not exit the airplane unless the airline says that they can do so safely.

If you get off, there’s no requirement that forces the airline to let you back on. The sticky wicket in the DOT rule is that if an airline says you can get off the airplane during a tarmac delay and you choose to get off, the airline is not required to let you back on the airplane.

Food and water are required. The tarmac delay rule also requires airlines to provide "adequate food and water, ensure that lavatories are working and, if necessary, provide medical attention to passengers during long tarmac delays.”

The U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) has handed down a record-breaking fine to United Airlines for repeatedly violating the tarmac delay rule. The a...

Article Image

Justice Department files lawsuit to block domestic alliance between American Airlines and JetBlue

An arrangement between American Airlines and JetBlue has raised the ire of the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ). Together with Attorneys General in six states and the District of Columbia, a lawsuit was filed on Tuesday to block an unprecedented series of agreements for the creation of the “Northeast Alliance.” In that partnership proposal, the two airlines would consolidate their operations in Boston and New York City. 

As you can imagine, that’s a pretty healthy combination. However, the DOJ felt not only would eliminate healthy competition in those cities, but will also harm travelers across the U.S. by greatly diminishing JetBlue’s incentive to compete with American in other markets , “further consolidating an already highly concentrated industry.”

“Millions of consumers across America rely on air travel every day for work, to visit family, or to take vacations. Fair competition is essential to ensuring they can fly affordably and safely,” said Attorney General Merrick B. Garland.

“In an industry where just four airlines control more than 80% of domestic air travel, American Airlines’ ‘alliance’ with JetBlue is, in fact, an unprecedented maneuver to further consolidate the industry. It would result in higher fares, fewer choices, and lower quality service if allowed to continue. The complaint filed today demonstrates the Justice Department’s commitment to ensuring economic opportunity and fairness by protecting consumers and competition.”

Good thing or bad thing for the traveler?

When the alliance was originally announced, both JetBlue and American were excited about the possibilities. From its podium, American said the partnership gave the air traveler a larger schedule of flights, frequent flyer cooperation, and a “seamless” travel experience.

The Department of Transportation (DOT) seemed favorable, too, and the partnership was actually approved by the Transportation Department just weeks before the Trump administration left office.

“Could American build up operations in Boston and New York without JetBlue’s help, leading to more competition? Sure, in theory, but you really think American’s management was going to be able to execute well on that? Like, have they been following the airline for the past decade?,” postured OneMileAtATime’s Ben Schlappig.

“I think a vast majority of frequent flyers would agree that reciprocal mileage earning and redemption opportunities, as well as reciprocal elite perks, benefit consumers,” Schlappig said, laying out consumer-facing pluses like giving American a better chance at competing in the New York area and working together on scheduling to make their networks more complementary.

“If you ask me, these kinds of partnerships are the sweet spots, compared to a merger — consumers get upside, but you still have a distinct competitor in the market,” he said.

An arrangement between American Airlines and JetBlue has raised the ire of the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ). Together with Attorneys General in six sta...

Article Image

As air travel rose this summer, satisfaction with airports declined

Air travel, severely restrained during the early months of the pandemic, resumed over the spring and summer as more people received COVID-19 vaccinations. But acute labor shortages throughout airport facilities have made air travel more challenging.

The latest J.D. Power North American Airport Customer Satisfaction Survey found travelers’ complaints are on the rise. In nearly every case, consumers cite the lack of employees at gift shops, restaurants, and rental car counters in the airports.

Michael Taylor, travel intelligence lead at J.D. Power, says customer satisfaction with airports was very high in the midst of the pandemic. Most airports were far from crowded, and traveling seemed easier.

“Ultimately, the data conveys changing expectations among travelers,” Taylor said. “Early in the pandemic, passengers were satisfied with any shop or restaurant being open, but they now expect full service at the airport.”

Labor shortages appear to be the main driver of decreased satisfaction. An analysis of ConsumerAffairs reviews of rental car agencies at airports showed a common theme — the agencies were often shorthanded.

Long waits at the rental car counter

Mary, of Mishawaka, Indiana, encountered just such a situation when she reserved a car at Thrifty Car Rental at Boston’s Logan Airport earlier this month.

“When I arrived to pick up the car, the line was very long which was no problem because it is at a busy airport,” Mary wrote in a ConsumerAffairs review. “However, after waiting in line for more than 30 minutes, I finally was checked in and received the paperwork to go and get the car. “When I arrived at the garage to pick up the car, the line was out the door but there was no one there working.”

Many consumers reviewing other car rental agencies at other U.S. airports cite a similar experience. The J.D. Power survey found airport businesses, such as food, beverage, and retail services, are the keys to a good airport experience, just as much as a good airline experience.

In the latest survey,  Miami International and Louis Armstrong New Orleans International scored highest in the factor for food, beverage, and retail in their respective segments. 

The survey noted the labor shortage throughout North America has resulted in several airport dining and retail locations closing, a situation that J.D. Power says has disproportionally affected medium-sized airports.

Air travel, severely restrained during the early months of the pandemic, resumed over the spring and summer as more people received COVID-19 vaccinations....

Article Image

United Airlines lifts nationwide ground stop and is back in the air

What started out as a bad Friday for United Airlines has started to turn for the better. After a systems outage brought the airline to a nationwide ground stop in both the U.S. and Canada, its fleet is back up in the friendly skies, according to reports from various media sources and the Federal Aviation Administration’s website.

In addition to flights being halted, there were reports that United’s app and website also were crippled, preventing travelers from checking in or boarding flights.

Just before 8 a.m. EDT on Friday, United issued a statement saying that it had “experienced technical system issues” and that all systems were back to normal.

“We are aware of the issue and are working to resolve it as quickly as possible,” the company wrote on Twitter, addressing consumer complaints. “We’re sorry for the inconvenience.”

Travel frustrations continue

The end of the summer travel season hasn't reduced the frustrations of travel. American Airlines wrestled with a fuel shortage, and Southwest Airlines, Delta Air Lines, and Alaska Airlines all suffered technical glitches that caused thousands of flight delays and cancellations. There's the laundry list of incidents about unruly behavior, too.

All of these stress points have put both travelers and airlines in a cautious dance trying to keep things under control. One ConsumerAffairs reviewer recently wrote that the great customer service she used to get from Southwest has declined a bit.

"I used to LOVE Southwest Airlines above all other companies. From the first moments I walked into the baggage line to the plane ride. It was top notch customer service. I even use their credit card. Last year I started noticing a decline in their kindness, but I chalked it up to Covid,” wrote Danielle of Virginia.

“It’s been hard year on us all," she continued. "The last straw was a couple weeks ago (my third trip on Southwest this summer). I had come into the check in baggage line in Reagan DC airport. I checked my bag in at the Kiosk and promptly got in line to give to the lady at desk. There was two lines to choose from, neither was marked clearly so I assumed (as others did) it didn’t matter which one we got into.”

That’s where things went south for Danielle. After more than an hour waiting in line, she said she started feeling anxious that she was going to miss her plane. Apparently, she wasn’t the only person dealing with customer service anxiety.

“There was a lady two people in front of me was being yelled at by TWO Southwest employees because she had used the kiosk and the line she stood in was for full service only," she wrote. "They made her go to other side and re get in line that was wrapped around three times. The Southwest man was non sympathetic to her pleas and the-other coworker was saying hateful remarks behind him. This lady left crying and I’m sure missed her flight. I now just realized and in a panic cause I self checked my bags at kiosk too and was so scared to face the attendant. I walk up to her and she nastily says, 'I really wish YOU people would wait to be called.' And then realized I had tagged my bag. She glared at me and says, 'Did you not just see what happened to the other lady?' And she continued to berate me and be very insulting while taking my bags. ... All she had to do was take my damn bag. She let me go through. But I was almost in tears.”

Danielle said that the flight was OK and that once she was aboard the flight, she had no complaints. Still, everything leading up to that may have hurt her love for Southwest. 

“I am completely disappointed, and hurt by this airline," she wrote. "Plane tickets aren’t cheap, it’s stressful to travel anyways, and to be treated like dog poop from the company you used to love sooo much. Is just too much. I am about to throw in my credit card and towel into this airline and find another.”

What started out as a bad Friday for United Airlines has started to turn for the better. After a systems outage brought the airline to a nationwide ground...

Article Image

American Airlines pilots’ union considers picketing over fatigue and overscheduling

While most of the flying world has been focused on mask mandates, poor passenger behaviors, and where we can and can’t fly, tensions have been rising among airline workers. It's gotten so tense that American Airlines pilots are setting up picket lines at AA hubs over crew fatigue brought on by the airline’s alleged overscheduling and inability to secure hotel rooms during layovers.

The Allied Pilots Association feels like its members have no other choice. The union hopes to get company management to come to their senses about pushing crew members to their limits in order to bolster revenue and keep up with increased travel demand during the summer.

“Our airline needs scheduling practices that support the safety margin, respect pilots’ and passengers’ needs, and de-risk American Airlines to protect and improve revenue,” the union said in a note to its membership. 

ConsumerAffairs contacted both the pilots association and the airline but had not received any comment by press time.

The union’s accusations come at an interesting time. It (as well as the flight attendant’s union) is currently in the middle of contract negotiations with American Airlines to try to cut a better deal for 15,000 workers.

American says it appreciates its pilots

American's senior leadership wasted little time responding to the situation. Chip Long, American's Vice President of Flight, sent a note to all the company's pilots on Friday to say that the company appreciates everything its workers have endured to help keep planes in the air and passengers in seats. 

“As the summer travel season comes to a close and we head into Labor Day weekend, I wanted to say thank you. Thank you for the professionalism and commitment to our airline you’ve shown this summer as we experienced the largest operational ramp-up in our company’s history so quickly. We’re glad our customers are returning, and because of each of you, we were ready to take them where they needed and wanted to go,” Long wrote.

“We had a challenging stretch in June due to weather, vendor staffing and temporary pilot training challenges that may have touched you or your schedule. Even though we immediately took aggressive action to minimize the disruption for our customers and our team, it was your leadership that allowed us to quickly get back on track. Since then, our pilot training and staffing  has been fortified.”

Long went on to remind the pilots that American has employed more active pilots this summer than in years past and that cancellations due to pilot availability were down 30%. 

“We’ve taken steps to ensure we can support the operation and get our customers where they want to go, when they want to go. At the same time, we continue to make important progress internally, managing and adapting in a way that provides tangible improvements for each of you. Yes, we still have work to do, but know that we’re committed to following through on every initiative and opportunity to support you in a meaningful way,” Long said.

Southwest pilots say they’re under the same pressure

American Airline's pilots aren't the only ones who may soon be protesting working conditions. The 9,000 members of the Southwest Airlines Pilots Association (SWAPA) are poised to do the same due to similar grievances. According to a report by CNBC, the union is considering picketing at U.S. airports during the end-of-year holidays. 

Southwest was sued by SWAPA last week over charges of violating federal labor laws. The airline was accused of modifying working conditions, company rules, and pay rates when the airline’s bottom line was threatened by the lingering COVID-19 pandemic.

While most of the flying world has been focused on mask mandates, poor passenger behaviors, and where we can and can’t fly, tensions have been rising among...

Article Image

Delta Air Lines tells some employees to get vaccinated or pay $200 surcharge

How serious is Delta Air Lines about its employees being vaccinated? Very serious. 

Effective November 1, any Delta employee who has health insurance through the company but hasn’t gotten their COVID-19 vaccination shot is subject to a $200 monthly surcharge. In addition, unvaccinated employees will be required to take a COVID-19 test every week starting September 12.

United Airlines and Hawaiian Airlines say they will also mandate vaccines for their employees.

Delta CEO says costs are too high

In describing his reasons for the mandate, all Delta CEO Ed Bastian had to do was point to the numbers. 

“The average hospital stay for COVID-19 has cost Delta $50,000 per person. This surcharge will be necessary to address the financial risk the decision to not vaccinate is creating for our company. In recent weeks since the rise of the B.1.617.2 variant [aka the Delta strain], all Delta employees who have been hospitalized with COVID were not fully vaccinated.”

Now that the Pfizer vaccine has been fully approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), Bastian essentially said that excuse is no longer valid. “We can be confident that the Pfizer vaccine is safe and effective, and has undergone the same rigorous review for other approved medications to treat cancer and heart disease, as well as other vaccines,” he said.

“Protecting yourself, your colleagues, your loved ones and your community is fundamental to the shared values that have driven our success for nearly a century. Vaccinations are the safest, most effective, and most powerful tool we have to achieve our goals, live up to our values and move forward,” Bastian concluded.

Investing in health and safety 

Delta was among the first to invest heavily in onboard health safety. Dating back to February 2020, the airline deployed “fogging” in its aircraft with an EPA-registered disinfectant. It also consulted with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the World Health Organisation (WHO) to ensure that it met or exceeded those agencies’ precautions related to the coronavirus.

Its proactive efforts have paid off, at least with some of its customers. Ronnie of Louisville, Ky., heaped praise upon the company in their ConsumerAffairs review.

“Flight was awesome. All personnel are top notch. Flight was smooth. Flight was on time. All Covid-19 keep me safe. Plane was very clean and could tell it had been sanitized. Even rest room was cleaned after each use. Thanks for a pleasant experience,” they wrote.

How serious is Delta Air Lines about its employees being vaccinated? Very serious. Effective November 1, any Delta employee who has health insurance th...

Article Image

Sparking cell phone prompts evacuation of Alaska Airlines jet in Seattle

The latest case of an overheated cell phone aboard a jetliner could have ended badly, but timing helped prevent tragedy. The device only began overheating and spewing sparks once an Alaska Airlines flight from New Orleans to Seattle had landed.

A spokesperson for Alaska Airlines told reporters that a cell phone belonging to a passenger aboard flight 751 started to overheat and give off sparks just as the plane landed at Sea-Tac Airport. The flight crew placed the burning device in a specially designed battery containment bag to prevent it from causing a fire.

However, the cabin was reportedly filled with smoke, causing the crew to order an evacuation. Aircraft doors were opened, and slides were extended down to the runway. Passengers were then directed to slide out of the aircraft.

The evacuation was not without incident. The airport reported on social media that two people were taken to a hospital for treatment of minor injuries. The other 127 passengers and six crew members were transported to the terminal.

Lithium-ion battery dangers

The incident underscores the potential danger of electronic devices that are powered by lithium-ion batteries aboard commercial aircraft. Had the incident occurred 20 minutes earlier while the plane was in the air, the results could have been different.

As far back as 2005, the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) was cautioning consumers about the hazards that could be created by their cell phone batteries. The agency explained that the lithium batteries used to power cell phones pack a lot of power into a small space.

These batteries are more sensitive to physical stress than alkaline batteries found in toys and flashlights, and they need to be treated with more care. Because of several close calls aboard aircraft over the years, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has enacted rules covering the shipment of these batteries and devices that are powered by them.

“Damaged or recalled batteries and battery-powered devices, which are likely to create sparks or generate a dangerous evolution of heat, must not be carried aboard an aircraft (e.g. carry-on or checked baggage) unless the damaged or recalled battery has been removed or otherwise made safe,” the agency said on its website.

FAA gives safety tips

Devices containing lithium metal batteries or lithium-ion batteries, including but not limited to smartphones, tablets, cameras, and laptops, should be kept in carry-on baggage, the FAA says. If these devices are packed in checked baggage, they should be turned completely off, protected from accidental activation, and packed so they are protected from damage.

These events are more common than you might think. The FAA has reported at least 18 such incidents, before this latest one, so far in 2021.

The latest case of an overheated cell phone aboard a jetliner could have ended badly, but timing helped prevent tragedy. The device only began overheating...

Article Image

Federal Aviation Administration fines for unruly airline passengers hits million dollar mark

The Federal Aviation Administration's latest tally of fines for unruly air passengers has eclipsed the $1 million dollar mark. On Thursday, the agency announced that it levied another $531,545 against 34 passengers for allegedly acting up on a flight.

Since the beginning of the year, the FAA has had close to 4,000 reports of unruly passenger behavior -- including nearly 3,000 reports filed regarding passengers refusing to comply with the federal facemask mandate.

How bad is this?

The FAA is about at its wit’s end on this matter. It’s called on airports to help address the situation -- especially with alcohol to-go -- and gone on a full-frontal public relations campaign to ask travelers to cool their jets.

Still, passengers continue to push the agency’s button, possibly because they know that the FAA has no criminal prosecutorial authority. Many times when an airline asks local law enforcement for its help, officers will meet the airline at the gate, but the offending passengers are often released without legal consequence. 

Seemingly undaunted, the FAA does have the power to fine unruly passengers and it’s being relentless in that department. 

Case in point: a new fine of $45,000 against a passenger on a jetBlue Airways flight from New York, N.Y. to Orlando, Fla. for allegedly throwing objects, including his carry-on luggage, at other passengers; refusing to stay seated; lying on the floor in the aisle, refusing to get up, and then of all things, grabbing a flight attendant by the ankles and putting his head up her skirt. The passenger was placed in flexi-cuffs and the flight made an emergency landing in Richmond, Va.

Rowdy passengers apparently love jetBlue

JetBlue seems to be a magnet for rowdy fliers. Out of the new fines assessed by the FAA, seven happened on a jetBlue flight.

In another jetBlue incident that resulted in a fine this week, $42,000 in damages was imposed against a passenger on a jetBlue Airways flight from Queens, N.Y. to San Francisco, Calif. Their offense? Allegedly interfering with crewmembers after failing to comply with the facemask mandate; making non-consensual physical contact with another passenger; throwing a playing card at a passenger and threatening him with physical harm; making stabbing gestures towards certain passengers; and snorting what appeared to be cocaine from a plastic bag, which the cabin crew confiscated. 

The passenger’s agitation was so egregious that the crew equipped themselves with ice mallets to ensure the safety of the flight if his behavior worsened. The flight diverted to Minneapolis, Minn., where law enforcement removed the passenger from the aircraft. 

The Federal Aviation Administration's latest tally of fines for unruly air passengers has eclipsed the $1 million dollar mark. On Thursday, the agency anno...

Article Image

American Airlines bans alcohol sales in Economy through January 2022

If you’re flying anywhere in the Economy class on American Airlines anytime soon and think you’d like to have a cocktail, better think again. The airline has decided to suspend all alcohol sales in Economy through January 2022. 

American’s original ban was set to end in September. The only other U.S. airline banning alcoholic beverages is Southwest Airlines. 

The airline’s ban is of its own choosing, but with the continued onslaught of penalties against airline passengers for alleged unruly behavior -- many involving alcoholic beverages -- American is taking no chances.

"We are doing all we can to help create a safe environment for our crew and customers onboard our aircraft," Stacey Frantz, American's senior manager of flight service policies and procedures, said in announcing the continued suspension of alcohol sales.

The FAA is calling on airports to help end alcohol to-go sales

Frantz told USA Today that the airline is "gaining ground'' in its push to get the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to cease alcohol to-go sales at airports it flies in and out of, including its hubs in Dallas and Charlotte.

While the FAA has yet to mandate an across-the-board ban on alcohol sales, the alcohol to-go situation is a huge concern for the agency. Earlier in August, the FAA sent a letter to airports requesting they work to prevent passengers from bringing “to-go” cups of alcohol aboard the aircraft.

Even though FAA regulations specifically prohibit the consumption of alcohol aboard an aircraft that is not served by the airline, we have received reports that some airport concessionaires have offered alcohol ‘to go,’ and passengers believe they can carry that alcohol onto their flights or they become inebriated during the boarding process,” read the letter. 

“Airports can help bring awareness to this prohibition on passengers carrying open alcohol onboard their flights through signage, public service announcements, and concessionaire education," the letter said.

If you’re flying anywhere in the Economy class on American Airlines anytime soon and think you’d like to have a cocktail, better think again. The airline h...

Article Image

Southwest Airlines says the Delta variant is negatively impacting its business

Southwest Airlines says the COVID-19 Delta variant is hurting its business. In a regulatory filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), the airline said customers have been booking fewer flights so far in August and are steadily canceling flights they've already booked. 

The end result is that Southwest expects its operating revenue estimates for August to be 15% to 20% below what they were in August 2019 and 3% to 4% less than it forecasted only three weeks ago.

Southwest isn’t holding out much hope that the downturn will reverse course anytime soon. Based on the assumption that COVID-19 cases will remain elevated in the near term, the company predicts that its operating revenue will be down 15% to 25% in September from the same period in 2019. The company said there was one bright spot in September -- Labor Day travel -- but officials said that prediction was based on bookings and cancellations “thus far.”

Is air travel headed backward?

Airlines are hoping they won’t have to go through the same financial straits that they experienced over the last year of the pandemic. When restrictions started loosening up in May and June, the pent-up demand from travelers gave airlines hope that they were headed for clear skies again. 

But the arrival of the Delta variant changed things quickly. Just weeks ago in July, Southwest said things looked great for the remainder of 2021 based on the volume of trips people were booking, prompting president Tom Nealon to say "we have not seen any impact from the Delta variant."

Southwest isn’t the only airline to feel the pinch of the Delta variant. The Transportation Security Administration’s (TSA) latest checkpoint travel numbers for August 10 were back to where they were two months ago, a state that’s 30% below the volume processed in August 2019.

Southwest Airlines says the COVID-19 Delta variant is hurting its business. In a regulatory filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), the a...

Article Image

Major U.S. airlines pull back from employee vaccination mandates

The great vaccination mandate debate took a new turn on Wednesday. While some companies are requiring their workforce to be vaccinated against COVID-19, three of the largest U.S. airlines have decided to go the opposite route. American Airlines, Delta Air Lines, and Southwest Airlines will no longer make workers get vaccinated. 

This marks the first time that American and Southwest have issued a vaccination direction, but it’s a complete about-face for Delta. Earlier this year, it said all new employees would be required to demonstrate proof of vaccination. 

The country’s fourth-largest airline -- United -- took the opposite stance earlier this week when it mandated that all employees have to be vaccinated.

“Strongly encourage” is the new line airlines are toeing

As reported by CNN, Southwest CEO Gary Kelly said in a company memo that he would “continue to strongly encourage” employees to get vaccinated but that the company would not make it a requirement.

“Obviously, I am very concerned about the latest Delta variant, and the effect on the health and Safety of our Employees and our operation, but nothing has changed,” Kelly wrote.

Delta CEO Ed Bastian also told Fox 5’s “Good Day New York” that he was no longer considering mandating vaccinations for the airline’s employees, figuring that “close” may be good enough. 

“We’re almost 75 percent vaccinated already,” he commented, “and if you think about that, you have probably some portion -- maybe call it five to 10 percent of our employee base -- that’s gonna have some medical or religious reason why they’re not getting vaccinated, you’re really down to a relatively modest number, maybe 10 to 20 percent of the unvaccinated, that you can drive with a mandate.”

“We’re going to continue to encourage it,” Bastian added. “I think there’s some additional steps, measures we can take to get the vaccine rates even higher, but what we’re seeing is every day, those numbers continue to grow. I’m really proud of our team.”

Over at American, CEO Doug Parker gave the New York Times’ “Sway” podcast his reasons for why he was avoiding vaccination mandates.

“We certainly encourage it everywhere we can, encourage it for our customers and our employees, but we’re not putting mandates in place,” Parker told the Times’ Kara Swisher.

Following the lead of United’s vaccination incentive to employees earlier this year, Parker added that American is offering incentives for unvaccinated employees to get inoculated, including an extra day of vacation next year for those who do so by the first of September. 

The great vaccination mandate debate took a new turn on Wednesday. While some companies are requiring their workforce to be vaccinated against COVID-19, th...

Article Image

Airbnb continues to fight an uphill battle against fees and fee abuse

Travelers in the “new normal” are starting to show favoritism toward short-term vacation rentals -- and for good reason. Some vacationers are still wary about being around a hotel lobby full of people and not knowing who’s been vaccinated and who hasn’t.

Unfortunately, some vacation rental owners have shown a lack of mutual respect for the cautious traveler -- like the tale of an Airbnb host who refused to honor a pandemic-mandated lockdown. 

One of the chief complaints is about exorbitant fees, such as the charges that some hotels are trying to get away with. When one Airbnb host posted a $114 cleaning fee, a Twitterstorm erupted to the tune of 210,000 likes and nearly 24,000 retweets. Unfortunately, it’s the sort of problem that the company is continuing to struggle with.

Complaints about guests, hosts, and Airbnb run rampant

The biggest issue with how Airbnb works may be that the company has to trust its hosts to conduct themselves in a professional manner -- one that doesn’t stain the company’s image and makes the customer feel good about their purchase. However, the company admits that completely vetting hosts is a nearly impossible task.

To be fair, horror stories about guests, hosts, and Airbnb itself have all made their way out into the ether. One ConsumerAffairs reviewer recently found themselves in the middle of crossfire issues that included all three.

“I had a conflict with a host. The guy was big and aggressive. I reported him. The host retaliated against my complaint by posting inflammatory lies about my stay. VERY INFLAMMATORY,” wrote Janice of Galveston TX recently.

Janice thought she had a right to file a complaint with Airbnb, but she said the company refused to take her claims seriously. 

“Although I had videotaped evidence that directly refuted the hosts' claims, Airbnb refused to delete the post [despite the fact that] Airbnb has an explicit policy that forbids dishonest claims or bullying posts and states they will be deleted. That was my 4th and last use of their platform. Thank God for American capitalism and competition. Hello Vrbo!”

Airbnb fees can be confusing

To help Airbnb customers gain a better understanding of how the company’s fees shake out, ConsumerAffairs contacted two Airbnb pros. Thibault Masson, founder of the vacation rental industry news site Rental Scale-Up, says figuring out all the fees that a consumer may need to pay can be confusing. 

“They are called fees, but they do not go into the same pockets,” Masson said. “Maybe the platform could do a better job educating travelers about what each fee is about. It also means that consumers should spend some time learning about this.”

For instance, most Airbnb users may have to pay a “service fee” that's taken by Airbnb, a “cleaning fee” that's taken by the host, and a “tax fee”  that's taken by the host per local requirements.

Masson explained that Airbnb takes an average 14.2% guest fee on the total amount of a stay, but consumers need to understand that the company takes a larger service fee depending on how large the rental property is and how long the guest is staying there.

“As people are trading up and using Airbnb to book large houses or for longer stays, the service fee proportionality goes up. It would be the same on Expedia when booking hotels, by the way,” he said.

Regarding cleaning fees, the same applies -- the larger the space, the larger the fee. Because of the pandemic, cleaning fees have grown due to updated cleanliness standards.

More factors go into fees than you might think

Kate Shaw, the co-founder of Retreat and an Airbnb “Superhost” -- a program that celebrates and rewards top-rated and experienced hosts -- gave ConsumerAffairs some insight on some of the other factors that go into calculating fees. She said when the guest community pushes back on fees, they often do it without considering the iceberg that lies underneath. 

“The amount of effort that goes into a guests’ stay is far more than just leaving a key under a mat. ... On the hosts' side, there are government permits and taxes to be paid. There are countless hours of maintenance crews, housekeeping hours, etc that make a home seem effortlessly accommodating. The fees that are charged and clearly outlined by Airbnb go towards a multitude of areas, all of which come together seamlessly in order to help guests have wonderful experiences.”

Shaw points out that most companies mark up their cost of goods by 30%-50%, sometimes more. “If you go out to eat, buy clothing, or get a coffee, the company you are purchasing from has marked what it costs them to purchase the raw goods by at least this percentage,” she said. 

Shaw says Airbnb marks up its product by 20% to guests and 3% to hosts, which she considers “reasonable.” Still, she thinks Airbnb could certainly improve the negative perception of fees. 

“While Airbnb can clearly lay out where fees are going, guests must do their part in order to understand the necessity of these fees,” she said.

Airbnb makes course corrections

After suffering through a flood of consumer complaints, a $1.2 billion loss, a rash of scammers brought on by the pandemic, and a legal settlement over fees, Airbnb recently began a mission to correct things -- hopefully once and for all.

For starters, the company has gone public with how hosts set their prices and cleaning fees, how other fees work, and who is charging the fee (Airbnb or the host). But, more importantly, the company is conducting a comprehensive review of its fees “with the objective of making pricing even more transparent and easy for Hosts and guests to navigate.” The company said the team in charge of this process aims to have the review and recommendations in place by December 15.

If that plan comes to fruition, it might be the game-changer that the company’s users have been clamoring for. Masson told ConsumerAffairs that Airbnb has already eliminated the commission that it takes from guests on every booking in a lot of countries outside of the U.S. 

“No magic bullet here,” Masson said. “In these other countries, the burden of fees has shifted entirely to hosts: They pay a 15% host fee, and guests pay 0%. This is actually what you see on Expedia when booking a hotel. Just as Expedia had to drop its guest fee for hotels years ago, Airbnb could be forced to do the same. Consumers hate additional fees. Hosts may pay more, but they can raise their prices too, as there is no more guest fee on top of their rates.”

Travelers in the “new normal” are starting to show favoritism toward short-term vacation rentals -- and for good reason. Some vacationers are still wary ab...

Article Image

Spirit Airlines forced to cancel hundreds of flights, leaving many travelers stranded

Spirit Airlines is experiencing a major meltdown, with the carrier canceling flights right and left and leaving travelers stranded. Unfortunately, the airline’s CEO says it’s likely to continue for now.

The budget airline’s misery started in late July when bad weather forced it to cancel flights. The next domino that fell was a shortage of pilots and flight attendants who had “timed out,” forcing the airline to cancel more flights because it had limited personnel in reserve to fill the gaps. 

That’s when things started spinning out of control. On Tuesday and Wednesday, Spirit canceled at least 60% of its flights, followed by another 56% on Thursday. Trying to offer a plausible reason why, Spirit CEO Ted Christie said the uprooted flight crews were strewn across the U.S., and it simply took extra time to play catch-up and get personnel and airplanes back into position. 

Christie said the airline also experienced some “technology outages” while trying to corral the necessary crews.

Travelers vent their dissatisfaction

Needless to say, Spirit left thousands of passengers in the lurch. One Spirit flier, Santosh of Edinburg, Texas, vented their frustration in a ConsumerAffairs review. 

“Are Spirit Airlines Bankrupt??? It's been cancelling twice on me. And I have to go from Austin to Edinburg. I keep booking rooms and cancelling it in less than 24 hrs. I am fed up. Who is going to compensate my cost? Moreover I need to join my work ASAP. I will never think of going in Spirit. Such a nightmare!!!”

USA TODAY reported that Spirit was sending some passengers $50 vouchers for future flights as a gesture of goodwill, but some considered the $50 a slight given the situation. In response, Christie tried to smooth things over. 

"The intent is to give people something they can use on us in the future,” he said. The executive made it known in an interview with CBS News that the airline was reimbursing passengers for things like food and accommodation.

It ain’t over ‘til it’s over

Anyone booked on a Spirit flight anytime soon could find themselves experiencing more of the same. Christie said cancellations will continue "over the next few days,'' but he said he hopes things will settle down once the weekend is over.

As of midday Friday, FlightAware reported that Spirit had canceled 260 flights -- 34% of its planned take-offs. Another 53 departures (making up 6% of its total flights) have been delayed.

Anyone who has plans to fly Spirit over the next week should be aware that the U.S. Department of Transportation has policies in place that may allow customers to receive refunds to cover certain costs. Those policies are available here.

Spirit Airlines is experiencing a major meltdown, with the carrier canceling flights right and left and leaving travelers stranded. Unfortunately, the airl...

Article Image

United Airlines to require all employees to get vaccinated

United Airlines has become the first major airline to require all of its employees to get vaccinated against COVID-19. All 67,000 of the company’s employees have until October 25 to get vaccinated or they’ll risk being fired. 

In a Friday memo to employees, United CEO Scott Kirby and President Brett Hart said the decision is rooted in United’s priority of keeping everyone safe. 

“We know some of you will disagree with this decision to require the vaccine for all United employees,” the executives wrote. “But, we have no greater responsibility to you and your colleagues than to ensure your safety when you’re at work, and the facts are crystal clear: everyone is safer when everyone is vaccinated.”

Mandating employee vaccination

By October 25, employees must upload proof that they received the recommended doses of any of the three vaccines that have received emergency-use approval from the FDA. Alternatively, employees have five weeks to get inoculated after the FDA grants full approval to any one vaccine -- “whichever comes first.” Full approval of the Pfizer vaccine is expected by early next month.

Exceptions will be made for those with medical or religious reasons, United said. Employees who are already vaccinated and can upload an image of their vaccination card before September 20 will be eligible for "an additional day of pay," Kirby and Hart said. 

Earlier this week, Tyson Foods mandated COVID-19 vaccines for its employees. The company said half of its workers are already vaccinated, but the other half will have until October 1 to get fully vaccinated. Tyson also said it would make exceptions for employees with certain health conditions or religious reasons. 

United’s decision to mandate vaccines is likely to have a ripple effect in the airline industry. Other airlines have offered incentives like extra pay or time off for vaccinations, but they haven’t required vaccinations. However, Delta Air Lines began requiring new employees to show proof of vaccination in May. United announced the same requirement the following month. 

United Airlines has become the first major airline to require all of its employees to get vaccinated against COVID-19. All 67,000 of the company’s employee...

Article Image

FAA calls on airports to help address the rise in unruly fliers

The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has called on U.S. airports to take action to combat the rise in unruly passengers that has taken place this year. Regulators want airport police to arrest more people who are unruly or violent on flights and for airport bars and restaurants to stop selling alcoholic beverages to go. 

"While the FAA has levied civil fines against unruly passengers, it has no authority to prosecute criminal cases," FAA Administrator Steve Dickson wrote to airport officials around the U.S. in a letter released Thursday. 

Dickson added that passengers who exhibit unruly behavior on planes are often met by law enforcement officers at airport gates upon landing, but these passengers are often released without legal consequence. 

"When this occurs, we miss a key opportunity to hold unruly passengers accountable for their unacceptable and dangerous behavior," he said.

Alcohol a factor in many incidents

Since the start of the year, the FAA has received 3,715 reports of unruly passengers. The agency said it’s concerned by the fact that flight attendants have reported being harassed, threatened, and even physically attacked.

The FAA said more than 2,700 of the 3,715 reports of unruly passengers it has received since January have involved passengers who refuse to wear a mask. Alcohol use has also been cited in a number of incidents. 

The agency said its investigations have determined that “alcohol often contributes to ... unsafe behavior.” Dickson said airport bars are contributing to the problem by allowing passengers to take alcoholic beverages to go.

"Even though FAA regulations specifically prohibit the consumption of alcohol aboard an aircraft that is not served by the airline, we have received reports that some airport concessionaires have offered alcohol ‘to go,’” Dickson wrote. "And passengers believe they can carry that alcohol onto their flights or they become inebriated."

The FAA is calling on airports to help put an end to that behavior by making public-service announcements about the rules.

"Airports can help bring awareness to this prohibition on passengers carrying open alcohol onboard their flights through signage, public service announcements, and concessionaire education," Dickson said.

The FAA noted that it still has a zero-tolerance policy for in-flight disruptions, which could lead to fines as high as $52,500 and up to 20 years in prison.

The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has called on U.S. airports to take action to combat the rise in unruly passengers that has taken place this year...

Article Image

United Airlines passengers can now pre-order food and drink

United Airlines has become the first U.S. airline to offer economy passengers the option to pre-order snacks and beverages. The move comes tailor-made for health-conscious travelers by giving them one more contactless interaction. It also adds another peg for United to build on as it focuses on transforming the customer experience.

Travelers can use United’s website or its app to pre-order their food and drink choices up to five days before departure. For now, the pre-order option is available on select flights departing from Chicago to Orange County, Calif., Sacramento, Calif., and San Diego. It will grow to cover any flight over 1,500 miles by early fall 2021. 

"Our new pre-order option reflects the customer experience transformation taking place at United – customers in our economy cabins will have an easy, convenient way to choose their snack or drink, and our flight attendants can move through the cabin faster, delivering more personalized service," said Toby Enqvist, chief customer officer for United. 

"This new feature also builds on our existing contactless payment technology, which has enabled us to safely resume our inflight food and beverage program on select flights."

How it works

The process, as United explains it, is very straightforward. Five days before taking off, passengers will receive an email notifying them that they’re able to pre-order. App users will also see the option in the Reservation Details section of the United app.

United says there’s a slight difference between people flying economy and those flying at an upgraded level. Economy fliers only have access to snacks, while those in premium seats will be able to make meal choices. 

Food options are starting to return

As airlines returned to full loads, drink and food options were somewhat limited. United evidently feels that it has a good plan and is moving forward with a list of expanded options.

The airline has added several wine and beer options to its lineup for economy fliers, including White Claw seltzers and Breckenridge Brewery IPAs. On the food side of the menu, there’s now a new tapas snack box with high-protein options and a “Recline” snack box that has movie theater-themed treats.

For those in the premium section, the enhanced meal service now includes a choice of entrees like an egg scramble with plant-based chorizo and a grilled chicken breast with orzo and lemon basil pesto.

The food and experience on United flights have earned the company some positive reviews from ConsumerAffairs users. Joel from Manassas gave the carrier five stars in his recent review.

"It has been a while since I have flown, but then to the best of my memory the seats were adequately comfortable and the meals were good. Also the landing and takeoff was smooth," he said.

United Airlines has become the first U.S. airline to offer economy passengers the option to pre-order snacks and beverages. The move comes tailor-made for...

Article Image

Union files grievance against American Airlines over accommodations for crew and pilots

A labor union has filed a grievance against American Airlines, saying flight attendants and pilots aren’t getting to “safe and comfortable” hotels during their layovers due to inadequate arrangements on the part of the carrier. 

The Association of Professional Flight Attendants (APFA), a labor union representing 40,000 American Airlines pilots and flight attendants, said hotel booking and transportation delays have caused some crew members to miss out on sleep. 

“We have Flight Attendants sleeping in airports and outside of baggage claim due to the company not providing hotel accommodations in a timely manner,” APFA National President Julie Hedrick said in a statement. “Crew rest is being impacted, and clean, comfortable, and quiet rooms are not being provided for required rest.”

APFA says flight attendants are encountering transportation issues that prevent them from getting to designated crew hotels. In some cases, flight attendants have allegedly had to get an Uber to a layover hotel only to find that there weren’t enough rooms available or that conditions were “unsuitable.” 

The issue of crew and pilots sleeping in the airport and outside of baggage claim has now reached “unprecedented, unacceptable levels,” the union claims.

American responds 

Under its contract with flight attendants, American Airlines is required to ensure that crew is put up in safe hotels with minimum standards, such as no rooms on the ground floor and no adjoining rooms. The airline said in a statement that it’s investigating the matter. 

“Taking care of our crewmembers while they’re away from home is a priority for American,” the company said.

APFA is asking the airline to grant additional unspecified relief to flight attendants that have been affected by the issue. 

Travelers also cite hotel problems

American Airlines pilots and crew members aren’t the only ones who are having trouble getting hotel accommodations. Several ConsumerAffairs reviewers have also reported difficulties when it came to staying at hotels after a flight cancellation or alteration. James from Norwood, Mass., said he had to foot the bill for travel and lodging accommodations after his flight was canceled.

“I feel that American who wouldn’t even refund the canceled flight should pay for the rental car and hotel,” he said in his review.

Misty from Calera, Ala., faced a similar situation after supposedly being stuck in the airport for over 14 hours after the cancellation of her connecting flight. 

“They shut down the line at 2am & they were very ugly about it saying that the workers had to go home because they had been there since the morning. Well, we were paying customers who had been there for 14 hours with no kind of answers. We weren't offered a hotel because they were full. We were offered nothing by American including answers,” she said.

A labor union has filed a grievance against American Airlines, saying flight attendants and pilots aren’t getting to “safe and comfortable” hotels during t...

Article Image

American Airlines warns about fuel shortages that are affecting flights

Reports of delays of jet fuel supplies at some small and midsize airports, a shortage of trucks and truck drivers, and a skyrocketing travel demand are forcing American Airlines to ask its pilots to conserve where they reasonably and safely can. On Monday, the company said to stretch out its available fuel supply, it might have to add in some quick stopovers. 

The airline said flight disruptions stemming from the fuel supply issue have been “minimal” so far and that zero flights have been canceled.

“American Airlines station jet fuel delivery delays initially affected mostly western U.S. cities, but are now being reported at American stations across the country. Delivery delays are expected to continue through mid-August,” John Dudley, managing director of flight operations, told pilots in a memo reviewed by CNBC.

A prime example of the impact can be seen in Bozeman, Montana, a location where a record number of travelers are flying for some vacation time. Earlier this month, the city’s Yellowstone International Airport experienced fuel delivery delays for nearly 12 hours that, in turn, caused a fifth of the airport's daily flights to be disrupted. 

Safety won’t be impacted

To mitigate the problem where it can, some American flights will carry additional fuel into the airports impacted by fuel shortages. Dudley said pilots have also been asked to use fuel-saving procedures like taxiing with a single engine.

To most, procedures like that might raise an eyebrow, but the airlines say there are no unsafe corners being cut and that passenger safety is still in check. 

“We want to make sure the safety margin is protected and we also want to make sure we aren’t leaving passengers behind,” said Dennis Tajer, spokesman for the Allied Pilots Association, the collective bargaining agent for the 15,000 professional pilots who fly for American Airlines.

American said it’s not alone

A Delta Air Lines spokesman confirmed to CNBC that it has also seen some fuel delay issues at smaller airports in the U.S. West -- specifically Reno, Nevada -- but that the situation hasn’t impacted flights to the point of operational issues. 

Southwest Airlines said it hadn’t experienced any issues to date, but the company told a CBS TV affiliate in Dallas that it has added more fuel on some planes to limit the amount needed at airports with shortages.

“We have been and continue to be in communication with federal authorities and pipeline operators to address this jet fuel capacity issue,” said Airlines for America, which represents most large U.S. carriers.

Reports of delays of jet fuel supplies at some small and midsize airports, a shortage of trucks and truck drivers, and a skyrocketing travel demand are for...

Article Image

CPSC urges Airbnb, Vrbo to introduce new elevator safety guidelines

The Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) has sent a letter to vacation rental companies like Airbnb and Vrbo to urge them to require owners to disable residential elevators or provide inspection certifications showing that there are no dangerous gaps. 

The CPSC’s letter follows the death of a 7-year-old boy at a beach rental home in North Carolina. The boy died after getting stuck between a moving elevator’s inner accordion door and its outer door. 

The agency said residential elevators "can pose a deadly but unforeseen hazard to children” and that fixes should be put in place right away to address the risks.

"Children, some as young as two and as old as 12, have been crushed to death in this gap, suffering multiple skull fractures, fractured vertebrae and traumatic asphyxia,” Robert Adler, acting chairman of the agency, said in the letter. “Other children have suffered horrific and lifelong injuries."

Fixing the problem

The letter said vacation rental companies are “in the unique position to have direct contact information for both owners and renters of vacation homes.”

The CPSC said the hazardous gaps between an at-home elevator's inner and outer doors can easily be made safer by placing space guards on the exterior doors. Alternatively, electronic monitoring devices could be used to deactivate elevators when a child is detected in the gap.

"These fixes are relatively inexpensive and can save lives," the letter said.

In the meantime, the CPSC said vacation rental platforms should immediately notify rentals about this potential hazard and ask hosts to lock outer access doors or disable elevators altogether. In the future, the agency said the companies should also require elevator inspections at any listed properties.

“By working together, we can stop these agonizing deaths and prevent further harm to children and families,” Adler said in the letter. 

Vrbo issues response

Airbnb and TripAdvisor said they were reviewing the letter from the CPSC, and Vrbo said it plans to follow through with at least some of the recommendations. 

"We will share important elevator safety information with property owners who have residential elevators," Vrbo told ABC News in a statement. "This will include a recommendation to disable elevators until they can be properly inspected and common safety issues addressed. Vrbo has also posted elevator safety information to our Trust & Safety page, accessible by all guests. Our terms require property owners to abide by all safety-related laws and to keep equipment safe and in working order with regular maintenance."

ConsumerAffairs readers have shared mixed experiences with vacation rentals from companies like Airbnb and Vrbo. Hosts and travelers have praised the platforms for being easy to navigate, but some reviewers have said they experienced unsafe safety conditions upon arrival. 

Abbigail of Ferndale, Michigan claimed that a vacation rental she found through Airbnb was “unsafe and difficult to access which was not accurately described by the rental property.” Samantha of Fort Lauderdale, Florida said her resort room got broken into, landing her in the hospital. 

The bottom line? Consumers should make sure they do their homework on any rental property to make sure it's safe to stay in.

The Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) has sent a letter to vacation rental companies like Airbnb and Vrbo to urge them to require owners to disable...

Article Image

FAA orders airlines to inspect all Boeing 737 aircraft over switch failure concerns

Airlines and the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) have another Boeing 737 issue to deal with. On Friday, the agency ordered urgent inspections of thousands of Boeing planes due to concerns with cabin altitude switches, the mechanism that keeps the cabins adequately pressurized during a flight. 

When Boeing took a look at the issue in 2020, it came to the conclusion that it didn’t pose a crucial safety risk. But when the same failure showed up again, both Boeing and the FAA reversed their stance -- and for good reason. If those switches fail or malfunction, it could potentially lead to immobilizing everyone aboard -- passengers, flight crew, and pilots. 

Altogether, 11,817 of Boeing’s 737 jets could be impacted --  2,502 airplanes registered in the U.S. and another 9,315 overseas. Even though the FAA has no legal authority on aircraft that don’t fly in or out of the U.S., a report from Bloomberg News suggests that it’s likely the order will also be rubber-stamped by foreign aviation agencies. 

According to a separate report from Reuters, the FAA is requiring that the switches be tested within 2,000 flight hours from the time the last test was administered, before airplanes have flown 2,000 hours, or within 90 days of the order’s effective date.

“Safety is our highest priority”

While the switch issue is yet another problem for Boeing to deal with, at least travelers who fly on American, United, and Southwest -- the U.S. airlines that use 737s -- can feel that their safety is not at stake.

“Safety is our highest priority and we fully support the FAA’s direction, which makes mandatory the inspection interval that we issued to the fleet in June,” Boeing said in a statement.

One other tidbit that might give fliers some comfort -- these switches are not the same ones cited in the Ethiopian and Lion Air 737 Max crashes. Those were stabilizer trim switches, according to a Boeing report when those incidents occurred.

Airlines and the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) have another Boeing 737 issue to deal with. On Friday, the agency ordered urgent inspections of thou...

Article Image

Delta Air Lines CEO says the Delta variant hasn’t affected bookings

Cases of the highly contagious Delta variant of COVID-19 are on the rise nationwide, but Delta Air Lines says travelers don't appear to be taking that news to heart when it comes to planning trips.

The airline says bookings on its flights haven’t suffered as a result, with CEO Ed Bastian noting that customers are still booking flights at the same pace.  

“We haven’t seen any impact at all from the variant,” Bastian said Wednesday on CNBC’s “Squawk Box,” citing bookings 60 to 90 days in advance. “As the news of the variant’s spreading, we haven’t seen any slowdown at all. We’re learning to live with this.”

Delta reported its second-quarter results on Wednesday, and the company’s quarterly revenue exceeded analyst expectations. Other airlines have also said they have bounced back from the depths of the pandemic, at least when it comes to leisure travel bookings. Business travel is recovering at a slower pace, but Bastian said domestic leisure travel is at “if not beyond” pre-pandemic levels. 

The CEO noted that 72% of Delta’s employees are fully vaccinated and that a “vast majority” of customers surveyed said they have been vaccinated. 

---

Editor's note: The story has been slightly modified to better delineate that the rise in Delta variant cases has not affected consumers' decisions to travel. Parallels between the name of the COVID-19 variant and the airline mentioned in the story are coincidental. 

Cases of the highly contagious Delta variant of COVID-19 are on the rise nationwide, but Delta Air Lines says its bookings haven’t suffered as a result. Th...

Article Image

United Airlines adds nearly 150 cold season flights to warmer climates

Sensing that a travel boom will likely continue into 2022, United Airlines is adding nearly 150 flights to warm-weather cities to its schedule for the upcoming winter season.

The airline is adding flight service to American destinations in California, Arizona, Georgia, Florida, and Nevada, as well as warmer sites in Mexico and beaches dotting the Caribbean. All told, United will offer 137 more flights than it did before the pandemic in 2019 starting this November through next March.

In its announcement, United said it’s prepared for the return of air travel for more than a year and says that it’s back to full speed. The airline seems confident that things will continue in its favor. Just last month, the company ordered 270 new planes and rolled out plans to hire 25,000 workers.

"Celebrating the holidays with family and loved ones in 2020 was a challenge, and we know our customers are already eager to plan winter vacations and gatherings in person this year to make up for time that they lost," said Ankit Gupta, vice president of network planning at United. "As pandemic restrictions ease, people are becoming more confident in planning travel further in advance, so we want to make sure to offer our customers as much choice as possible."

The warm weather add-ons

Out of the 150 additional flights that United will add come November, the highlighted routes include: 

  • Up to 25 additional daily flights from New York/Newark to cities including Ft. Myers, Jacksonville, and Savannah;

  • Up to 14 additional daily flights from Denver to cities including Charleston, Ft. Lauderdale, and Savannah;

  • Up to 12 additional daily flights from Chicago to cities including Key West, Las Vegas, and San Diego;

  • Up to 11 additional daily flights from Washington D.C. to cities including Charleston, New Orleans, and Phoenix;

  • Up to seven additional daily flights from Houston to Florida including Miami, Orlando, and Palm Beach;

  • Up to four additional daily flights from Los Angeles to Orlando, Tampa, and Ft. Myers;

  • Up to four additional daily flights from Cleveland to Orlando, Tampa, and Ft. Myers; and

  • Up to three additional daily flights from San Francisco to Orlando and Ft. Myers.

In addition, United is launching 12 new routes from Denver, Los Angeles, New York/Newark, San Francisco, and Washington, D.C. to destinations like Belize City, Belize; Cozumel, Mexico; Liberia, Costa Rica; and Nassau, Bahamas.

Going in September vs. going in February

When ConsumerAffairs ran a quick check on Google Flights to sample United fares on two of its routes, we found that flying from New York City to Ft. Myers, Florida, or Chicago to Las Vegas in September versus February offered a slightly better fare ($50-$75). 

But anxious travelers should remember three tips when booking flights: 1) fares change frequently; 2) they change as the flights start to fill up with travelers; and, 3) buying the cheapest fare often means travelers won’t get the same service. This might mean having to pay baggage fees or not being able to select your seat.

Travelers should also keep in mind that the airline industry is still operating differently than it was before the pandemic. There are changes to in-flight services, an ongoing requirement to mask-up, and a firmer, no-nonsense approach to traveler behavior.

Sensing that a travel boom will likely continue into 2022, United Airlines is adding nearly 150 flights to warm-weather cities to its schedule for the upco...

Article Image

United Airlines buys 270 new planes and looks to hire 25,000 new employees

United Airlines went on a buying spree on Monday, one that’s expected to lead to 25,000 new hires over the next five years.

"United Next" is what the airline has dubbed its gambit. The plan calls for the addition of 270 Boeing and Airbus Aircraft to its fleet. The purchase agreement is the largest in company history and represents the biggest commitment by a single carrier over the last 10 years.

The company is also retrofitting all of its current “mainline” aircraft to cater to a new customer experience and a new signature interior. By 2026, United passengers will find a dramatic increase in the number of premium seats -- an average of 53 per plane -- larger overhead bins, seatback entertainment in every single seat, and what United says will be the industry's fastest available WiFi.

"Our United Next vision will revolutionize the experience of flying United as we accelerate our business to meet a resurgence in air travel. By adding and upgrading this many aircraft so quickly with our new signature interiors, we'll combine friendly, helpful service with the best experience in the sky, all across our premier global network,” said United CEO Scott Kirby. 

“At the same time, this move underscores the critical role United plays in fueling the broader U.S. economy – we expect the addition of these new aircraft will have a significant economic impact on the communities we serve in terms of job creation, traveler spending and commerce."

Hiring boom on the horizon

What a difference a year makes. This time last year, United was in the middle of furloughing thousands of workers and cutting deals with pilots -- two of the various labor moves it would find itself making before 2020 ended. The company said its aggressive move will require around 25,000 more workers. 

Based on a study from the Federal Aviation Administration, United expects to create more than $30 billion in traveler spending and add an estimated $50 billion to U.S. coffers by 2026.

United added that by replacing its older and smaller mainline jets, it will also upgrade the fleet’s overall fuel efficiency by 11% and lower carbon emissions by between 17-20%.

United Airlines went on a buying spree on Monday, one that’s expected to lead to 25,000 new hires over the next five years."United Next" is what the ai...

Article Image

Pandemic travel -- navigating the airline process and returning to the skies

This time a year ago, I was planning to enjoy one of my best friend’s weddings before driving from Los Angeles to Utah to go canyon tripping. But no -- an unexpected little virus shut my wanderlust down. No wedding, no canyon, no driving to see the grandkids, no return trip to Mexico City to show my girlfriend what I discovered only the year before. Nothing. 

Binge-watching and carry-out have their limits, and after the COVID-19 pandemic cooped me up for 477 days straight, my cabin fever had reached an unbearable limit. I had my vaccinations, I was starting to feel comfortable in public, and I was feeling more secure after seeing many of my fellow Americans mask up and socially distance.

Then came May – Mental Health Month – and I decided that I should throw myself a “Take That, COVID!” party, cash in a bunch of airline miles, and hit the road again.

Coming out of the pandemic and being able to travel again was a big deal for me. I had four trips planned for 2020, and all of them were wiped out. But being fully vaccinated and confident that most of the world’s citizens were on the same page about being cautious and respectful, I decided to put together a personal COVID-19 revenge tour.

Of all the places I’ve been in the U.S., one patch of land I’d never set foot on was northern California. I’d been to San Francisco many times and Napa once, but seeing the redwoods and Yosemite was a particular attraction that I wanted to check off my bucket list.

For the throng of wanderlusters who are anxious to get out and go somewhere -- anywhere -- I thought it might be helpful to share my experiences. Going to attractions, sporting events, flying, car rentals, hotel reservations, the whole shooting match.

Let’s start with...

Getting a flight

Booking the trip online was super simple. Making changes wasn’t. For some unknown reason, I wasn’t able to modify a portion of my trip online and had to contact Delta directly. The airline’s preference was for me to do it on my phone or tablet and use their artificial intelligence (AI) platform to guide me through the changes via text. 

I’m sure I wasn’t the only person making changes, and the airline’s systems had to be overloaded. But going the AI direction wasn’t as effective as the airline might have liked it to be. So, my next bet was calling directly. However, the hold time was so long -- I think I stopped counting at four hours -- that I finally gave up, went to bed, and woke up early to try it again.

As they say, the early bird gets the worm, and calling before the rest of the traveling world woke up the next morning got me to someone quickly. From there, a live person made the flight changes a snap. Situation solved.

Coach, first, cash, or miles?

There are lots of good airfare deals to be had, and there are lots of destinations anxious for fresh faces. As for me, I opted for a gift from-me-to-me for making it through the pandemic and indulged myself by cashing in enough Delta Air Lines frequent flyer miles to fly first class. 

Doing that would pretty much deplete my account, but I figured it would be worth it. I’d save several hundred dollars, and going first class might be a well-earned treat -- at least it was pre-pandemic when I cashed in a bunch of United miles to fly first class to Mexico City.

At the airport and onboard

Getting through the airport took a tad longer because there are a few added hoops to jump through -- proof of vaccination and extra precautions in security check, for example -- but Delta’s phone app was flawless and check-in and boarding were both a breeze. I wasn’t alone in wanting to go somewhere either. The flights I found myself on were close to capacity.

Onboard, I was impressed with Delta’s buttoned-up approach. The representatives and flight crew were patient, thorough, health-conscious, and firm. Masks on, no nonsense.

No disrespect meant, but past that, cashing in 96,000 miles to fly first class proved a disheartening return on investment. Yes, the seats were larger and the legroom more spacious, but I thought there would at least be something special about sitting up front. Many of the typical amenities that I expected from flying in first class just weren’t there. No hot towels, no welcome glass of champagne, no pre-take-off snack, none of the typical polish and style.

The meal was another buzzkill. I was given a choice of two snack boxes which, by all standards, were plentiful and tasty. But at the end of the day, they were still snack boxes.

Afterward, I asked Delta’s media relations department if typical first class amenities would be returning, and there’s good news for travelers in the near future. Delta said they are bringing back onboard services in a “measured way to ensure the safety and wellbeing of [its] passengers.” As far as hot food options go, the airline said customers can expect them on “select domestic coast-to-coast flights.” Fliers in first class on other key U.S. routes should expect fresh boxed meals beginning in early July. 

The leave behind

If you plan on flying somewhere, I have a few suggestions based on my experience:

Be considerate. Airlines have been in a pickle for nearly a year and a half thanks to the pandemic, and they’ve been forced to take on devastating losses. Because of that, they’re taking calculated, judicious steps to make sure every precaution is taken and every passenger is kept healthy and safe.

No mask, no fly. Despite differing mask protocols at stores or in public, wearing a mask on any form of public transportation is still a federal requirement. The airlines are enforcing it and expecting every passenger to show mutual respect for their fellow travelers.

Be flexible on dates. Airfares are based on inventory, and there are lots of people besides yourself who want to take a break from the pandemic. Giving your calendar some wiggle room could save you hundreds of dollars.

Cheapest is not always best. One thing I’ve learned over time is that the cheapest fares are painfully restrictive. Not only do you have to pay extra for baggage and aren’t allowed to make a seat selection in advance (which could force families to be split up), but you’ll be looking at hefty fees if you need to change your ticket. 

Basic economy fares are final, meaning changes and refunds are out of the question. My advice is to pay a little extra for regular coach. For as little as $30, it’s worth the cost of avoiding hassles and getting some flexibility.

Get to the airport early. Flights are running full, and with extra precautions being taken going through security, every extra minute can make a difference.

Think about getting a new credit card tied to an airline or perks. There are plenty of great credit card deals coming down the pike right now. Finding one that can offer bonus miles or access to amenities like airport lounges, free checked bags, and early boarding could be worth it if you’re looking to really get back to traveling.

Prepare for minimal food service. If you think you’ll be hungry, save yourself the price of onboard snacks. TSA allows passengers to bring on almost every kind of food they can think of -- sandwiches, fruits, veggies, even a thermos of coffee.

“Beyond in-flight meals, it's tough to get food at all in some airports, too,” Daniel Burnham, Scott’s Cheap Flights Senior Member Operations Specialist, reminded me in an email. “Many restaurants and shops in airport terminals are still closed or operating limited hours, and for business class passengers, many flagship lounges in the United States have yet to reopen.”

Ask questions. While my sole experience was on Delta, other airlines have different levels of service depending on routes, length of the flight, and whether a flight is considered “select.” For fliers hoping to pamper themselves, it would be smart to ask in advance what special perks are included so you know exactly what your expectations should be.

This time a year ago, I was planning to enjoy one of my best friend’s weddings before driving from Los Angeles to Utah to go canyon tripping. But no -- an...

Article Image

FAA levies fines totaling over $124,000 for more unruly passenger behavior

The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) says airline passengers are still acting up and that it will be levying more fines for bad behavior. The agency is proposing $124,500 in civil penalties against eight unruly airline passengers, ranging from $9,000 to $22,000 in fines for each person. The incidents allegedly included interfering with flight attendants, assaulting flight crew, drinking alcohol brought aboard planes, and refusing to wear face masks.

The new enforcement actions are part of the FAA’s zero-tolerance policy that targets disruptive and dangerous behavior by passengers. Since the first of the year, troublemaking fliers have chalked up more than 3,000 violations and $563,800 in proposed fines.

Things have gotten so bad that Airlines for America, an industry trade organization, has asked U.S. Attorney General Merrick Garland to step in so that cases involving unruly passengers can be prosecuted more quickly.

Masks are still required

The FAA’s announcement comes less than a month after a flurry of incidents cost a Southwest Airlines flight attendant two front teeth. While there were no dental emergencies this time, there were punches thrown by a Southwest Airlines passenger. The passenger wound up being forcibly removed from the plane and charged with assault by Dallas police, and their stunt earned them a $21,000 fine. 

Six of the eight instances -- including the aforementioned -- involved face coverings: ignoring instructions to wear a face mask, refusing to put one on, throwing a mask at an airline representative, etc. 

These situations might be linked to mixed messages regarding face masks that people are getting from retail stores, restaurants, and state/local governments. However, the bottom line remains that anyone traveling on public transportation is required to wear a mask. 

The requirements for masking up may be amended at some point, but the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the Transportation Security Administration (TSA), and the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) are shoulder-to-shoulder in enforcing the mandate for now. 

DOT officials say anyone who is planning to use public transportation and has a question about face masks should save themselves some time, trouble, and a potentially hefty fine by asking about current mask mandates via email. The address to submit questions is TransitMaskUp@dot.gov.

The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) says airline passengers are still acting up and that it will be levying more fines for bad behavior. The agency i...

Article Image

American Airlines is cutting back flights during the summer

American Airlines cancelled hundreds of flights over the weekend as stormy weather battered parts of the South. The carrier also disclosed plans to trim its flight schedule by 1% through the middle of next month.

The cuts come amid a surge in travel bookings and that, apparently, is part of the issue. American is concerned its current schedule, beefed up in early spring as the economy began to reopen, will strain operations.

Not only does the airline have to make sure it has enough flight crew members to operate each flight, it also depends on mechanics, baggage handlers, and third-party service providers like caterers. With the current labor shortage, many of these jobs are unfilled.

Airline executives said the weekend’s bad weather underscored the difficulty of summertime operations, when planes are full but the weather is uncertain.

“The bad weather, combined with the labor shortages some of our vendors are contending with and the incredibly quick ramp-up of customer demand, has led us to build in additional resilience and certainty to our operation by adjusting a fraction of our scheduled flying through mid-July,” the airline told CNBC. “We made targeted changes with the goal of impacting the fewest number of customers by adjusting flights in markets where we have multiple options for re-accommodation.”

Cancellations began on Friday

Gary Leff, who writes “The View From the Wing” blog, said American began cancelling flights on Friday, with the number steadily rising through the weekend.

“Today is worse than yesterday with 176 cancels already,” Leff posted on Sunday. That’s nearly 50% more than Saturday. And there are already about 100 cancels on the books for Monday.”

For American and other airlines that may take a similar course of action, it’s a financial setback. After a year in which passenger traffic plunged, consumers are only now beginning to spend money on travel. 

For consumers, fewer flights mean more sold-out planes and more difficulty in getting to a destination. Fares may also rise.

Consumers should remember that when a flight on which they are booked is cancelled the airline is required to offer a refund. This became an issue early in the pandemic when airlines cancelled thousands of flights and encouraged passengers to accept a voucher for a future flight.

American Airlines cancelled hundreds of flights over the weekend as stormy weather battered parts of the South. The carrier also disclosed plans to trim it...

Article Image

Southwest Airlines technical glitches cause thousands of flight delays and cancellations

Travelers booked on Southwest Airlines flights were confronted with thousands of cancellations and delays this week thanks to technical issues that impacted the airline’s systems. 

The issues revolved around problems with feeds from a third-party weather data provider on Monday. That was followed by a network connectivity issue on Tuesday afternoon that affected its reservation system. Southwest doesn’t believe the two issues were connected, but it's still investigating that possibility.

With its hands full, Southwest asked the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) for its help on Tuesday. The agency tweeted that it issued a temporary nationwide grounding at the airline's request. By late afternoon on Tuesday, the FAA stated that Southwest was "in the process of resuming normal operations." 

When all was said and done, 500 Southwest flights were estimated to be canceled, and somewhere between 900 and 1,300 flights were delayed.

Delta Air Lines and Alaska Airlines also affected

According to a variety of media reports, Delta Air Lines and Alaska Airlines also suffered technical issues that impacted their booking apps and sites. Delta sent ABC News a statement on the issue on Monday night. 

"Delta teams are working to quickly address a technical issue that is making it difficult for customers to purchase flights on delta.com, the Fly Delta app, and through our Reservations Call Center. The ability to check in for flights is not affected. We apologize to our customers for any inconvenience this is causing," the airline said.

Travelers booked on Southwest Airlines flights were confronted with thousands of cancellations and delays this week thanks to technical issues that impacte...

Article Image

American Airlines, Virgin Atlantic, and Microsoft invest in electric air taxi company

Vertical Aerospace, a U.K.-based air taxi startup, said Thursday that it has secured investments from American Airlines, Virgin Atlantic, and Microsoft. The company is aiming to make zero-emissions on-demand travel in flying taxis a reality. 

Vertical Aerospace said it has pre-orders for up to 1,000 of its VA-X4 vertical takeoff aircraft and plans to go public via a deal with Broadstone Acquisition Corp. The deal is expected to close in the second half of 2021.

"This is the most exciting time in aviation for almost a century," Vertical Aerospace CEO and co-founder Stephen Fitzpatrick said in a statement. "Electrification will transform flying in the 21st century in the same way the jet engine did 70 years ago.” 

Zero emissions flying taxis

The firm’s aircraft will travel at speeds of over 200 miles per hour and be “near silent” when in flight. Its first test flight is slated to take place later this year. American Airlines has agreed to order at least 250 aircraft.

"Emerging technologies are critical in the race to reduce carbon emissions and we are excited to partner with Vertical to develop the next generation of electric aircraft," said Derek Kerr, chief financial officer of American Airlines.

Although there’s a great deal of hype surrounding flying taxis, analysts say it could take several years for electric aircraft to be certified by aviation authorities. Last month, Europe’s top regulator said the region could see the first flying taxis in use as early as 2024. 

“Today’s announcement brings together some of the largest and most respected technology and aeronautical businesses in the world and together we can achieve our aim of making the VA-X4 the first zero carbon aircraft that most people will fly on,” Fitzpatrick said. “The United Kingdom is already a global leader in aerospace innovation and we believe Vertical Aerospace will be the British engineering champion to drive the aviation industry forward.”

Vertical Aerospace, a U.K.-based air taxi startup, said Thursday that it has secured investments from American Airlines, Virgin Atlantic, and Microsoft. Th...

Article Image

United Airlines to offer pilots and flight attendants bonuses if they get a COVID-19 vaccination

To make sure it’s got every angle of health safety covered, United Airlines is adding a bonus to the paychecks of pilots and flight attendants who have received their COVID-19 vaccination.

United is the first major U.S. carrier to offer such an incentive, but Delta recently made it a requirement for all new employees to prove they’ve been vaccinated.

Under the agreement the union and airline came to in a special meeting on Wednesday, United flight attendants who have received their vaccine by June 9 will get up to three additional days (a total of nine hours and forty-five minutes) off in their upcoming 2022 vacation day bank. 

Getting vaccinated is purely voluntary, but both the Association of Flight Attendants union (AFA) and the airline say they have a shared priority in getting as many flight attendants vaccinated as quickly as possible for a number of reasons. 

“First and foremost, the vaccine provides an additional layer of protection in addition to mask compliance and cleaning process initiatives,” AFA said in a blog post.

Some countries may require vaccination

The AFA left in a “what if” scenario in the agreement -- one aimed to address a situation in which a country might require flight attendants to be vaccinated.

“It is anticipated, without advance notice, some countries may begin to require flight crews to be vaccinated. In the event a vaccination requirement was to come about, any Flight Attendant not vaccinated and/or who has not provided documentation to substantiate the vaccination to United would be ineligible to work any flight to a destination in a country where a vaccination requirement exists,” the union said.

United pilots will receive something similar to flight attendants. Those who show proof of vaccination before June 10 will get 12 hours of pay and 11 hours of pay after that through June 30, when the incentive ends.

Roughly 80% of United’s estimated 12,500 pilots have been vaccinated, according to a company spokeswoman.

To make sure it’s got every angle of health safety covered, United Airlines is adding a bonus to the paychecks of pilots and flight attendants who have rec...

Article Image

United Airlines offers vaccinated travelers a chance to win a year of free flights

United Airlines has announced that passengers who upload their vaccination record to its app or website will be entered to win a year of free flights. The “Your Shot to Fly” sweepstakes will run from May 24 through June 22. 

During the month of June, United plans to give away 30 pairs of tickets. Then, on July 1, the airline will randomly select five MileagePlus members who have entered the contest as the winners of its grand prize of free flights for a full year. 

Winners will get to fly with one other person, be seated on any class of service, and travel to any location across the globe. The grand prize is limited to a total of 26 round-trip flights taken during the year.

“We’re proud to do our part to incentivize people to get their shot," United CEO Scott Kirby said in a press release. "Thanks to the vaccine, more and more destinations are opening up for travel and we know our customers are eager to fly. We’re excited to give people one more reason to get vaccinated so they can reunite with friends and family or take that long-awaited vacation which all could be just one shot away.”

United joins other companies offering incentives for customers to get vaccinated against COVID-19. Krispy Kreme is giving free doughnuts to vaccinated customers, Budweiser is running a free beer giveaway, and Shake Shack announced Friday that it plans to expand its vaccination promotion of free fries nationwide. 

Uber and Lyft have also joined the effort to encourage people to get vaccinated. Last week, the ride-sharing giants announced a new partnership with the White House through which they will offer free rides to anyone going to a vaccination site to get their COVID-19 shot. 

United Airlines has announced that passengers who upload their vaccination record to its app or website will be entered to win a year of free flights. The...

Article Image

FAA requests that airlines weigh passengers to keep planes safe

U.S. airlines may begin weighing passengers as a way to comply with Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) rules. A report from ViewFromTheWing says that as Americans have gained weight, the FAA never adjusted its weight and balance calculations for aircraft, especially smaller planes.

While “Can you step on the scale, please?” isn’t likely to become a standard procedure at the airport, travelers will likely encounter it at some point in their flying life. The FAA says the weigh-ins should be done at airports that represent a minimum of 15% of an airline’s daily departures, and it should be done once every three years so that officials have a better chance of calculating weight assumptions.

The agency suggests that the screenings be done randomly and take place outside of the regular TSA screening place and in a secure area of the airport where travelers catching a connecting flight can be included. To avoid embarrassment, the agency will make sure that the readout of a person’s weight will remain hidden from public view.

Potential problems

To avoid any potential problems, the FAA is making the procedure completely voluntary. That means travelers who don’t want to step on a scale don’t need to. However, airlines have the option of weighing everyone or asking a passenger how much they weigh. 

Of course, asking someone their weight doesn’t always produce an accurate answer. For situations like that, the FAA advises airlines to add 10 pounds to account for clothing -- especially in winter. If the person doing the screening thinks the passenger understated their weight, the screen “should make a reasonable estimate of the passenger’s actual weight and add 10 pounds.”

Another issue that might come out of this is that airlines might have to remove some seats in order to meet government weight rules if the average passenger weight goes up significantly. That might make it harder for consumers to get a seat on a flight, and it would cut into airlines’ revenue stream.

Already happening in other countries

Airlines in other parts of the world already have weight checks in place. In Samoa, where a study showed that 22% of Soman women were overweight and 58% were obese, Somoa Airlines tried its hand at fares based on weight. 

Similar to what the FAA is proposing, New Zealand’s Civil Aviation Authority recently mandated that airlines conduct weight surveys at least once every five years.

U.S. airlines may begin weighing passengers as a way to comply with Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) rules. A report from ViewFromTheWing says that as...

Article Image

Vrbo or Airbnb? ConsumerAffairs reviewers weigh in

Consumers have lots of options when it comes to travel lodging. In addition to the multitude of hotels and motels, short-term apartment and house rentals are growing in popularity, boosted lately by a desire to travel after facing restrictions linked to the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic.

What both Vrbo and Airbnb offer travelers are additional space and more privacy than a typical hotel. In some cases, a traveler may pay the same or less for an entire house or apartment than they would for a nice hotel room.

The business models of the two companies are similar. Neither owns the properties they book. Instead, they act as the agents for property owners offering their homes for short-term rental. They collect “transaction” or “service” fees and provide a platform that consumers can use to select and book properties. While Airbnb properties may include a portion of a private home or apartment, Vrbo says it limits its offerings to entire houses.

Customers posting reviews at ConsumerAffairs found a lot to complain about with both companies. But a reading of the reviews posted so far in 2021 suggests that many of the complaints have more to do with the individual property owners than either company.

However, Vrbo gets a 1.1-star rating based on 344 reviews and ratings, while Airbnb scores 3.6 stars based on 1,527 reviews and ratings. Does one company perform better than the other? According to our reviewers, Airbnb has an edge.

Customer service

What appears to be the biggest knock on Vrbo is the company’s customer service; the issue was mentioned often. The platform, which is owned by Expedia Group, says customer service has always been a point of emphasis but concedes that it has faced recent challenges in that area.

“In the past year, customer service volume has been unusually high due to the pandemic and an influx of requests and questions related to cancellations and refunds,” the company said in an email to ConsumerAffairs. “We continue to ramp up the phone lines and field requests as quickly as possible. We’ve also enhanced our self-service tools significantly over the past year and encourage customers to use the Virtual Agent chat feature on our site to manage their bookings.”

We reached out to Airbnb for input to this article but had not heard back by the time of publication.

We searched for reviewers who had used both services and found Iyonna of Newark, New Jersey. She told us there wasn’t much difference between Vrbo’s and Airbnb’s properties. However, she gave the edge to Airbnb’s customer service department.

But Matilda, of Houston, had a bone to pick with Airbnb’s customer service. She told us she was unable to get into her rented home and couldn’t contact the host. She said she contacted Airbnb’s customer service.

“They aren't able to contact the host and let me know they will reimburse me,” she wrote in her post. “It's 8 pm on a Saturday and my family has nowhere to stay. I'm sent a link from customer service to find another host that can accommodate me, no one can.”

Consistency could be an issue

David Fiorenza is an associate professor of Practice at Villanova University who developed and teaches a course called Economics of Tourism. He says most travelers are not only price-conscious but also fickle.

“Most consumers like consistency and at the least want the new experience to be equal to the last experience, if not a better experience,” he told ConsumerAffairs. “Older travelers may not have a comfort level with Airbnb or Vrbo if their experiences in the past have been with a travel agency or group travel.”

Marla -- a reader from Mount Hermon, California, who had generally nice things to say about Airbnb -- agrees. She suggests that some of the people complaining about bad experiences might have unrealistic expectations about what Airbnb and Vrbo offer.

“It is not like the hotel circuits, and the hosts are not wealthy business moguls (as a rule),” she wrote in a ConsumerAffairs post. “This is more like a hostel situation since 9.5 times out of 10 you will be sharing a bathroom with several other rooms but you'll sometimes also have things like a full kitchen, food that the host brought or someone else left, and free washer/dryers.”

Fiorenza’s advice to travelers is to think about their budget and desired experience before they book. He says Airbnb is good for those on a budget, since you may be booking a spare room. Vrbo, he says, is better if you are looking for a private vacation home.

About our reviews

ConsumerAffairs verifies all reviews before they are published, and we require contact information to ensure our reviewers are real. We use intelligent software that helps us maintain the integrity of reviews, and our moderators read all reviews to verify quality and helpfulness.

Consumers have lots of options when it comes to travel lodging. In addition to the multitude of hotels and motels, short-term apartment and house rentals a...

Article Image

Delta Air Lines to require all new employees to be vaccinated against COVID-19

To demonstrate how serious it’s taking the opportunity to be flying again, Delta Air Lines will require all new employees to be vaccinated against COVID-19. The airline’s move makes it one of the few major corporations to mandate that hiring requirement.

“Any person joining Delta in the future, a future employee, we’re going to mandate they be vaccinated before they can sign up with the company,” Ed Bastian, the airline’s chief executive, said in a CNN interview on Thursday evening.

Bastian said Delta’s current staff is exempt, but he said 75-80% of employees have already been vaccinated and that he would “strongly encourage” the others to step up as well. 

Now that Delta has made the first move, it’s possible that other airlines may follow suit. But, for the time being, Delta is flying solo in this effort. United’s president Scott Kirby floated the idea to employees back in January, but he said the carrier could not “realistically be the only company” to do so. 

Vaccination requirements for employees are starting to grow

Should — or much less, can — companies require employees to be vaccinated to get or keep a job? “For large corporations, such decisions are thorny,” postured the New York Times’ Niraj Chokshi. “On one hand, requiring vaccinations for all employees would lower the anxiety of workers returning to the office and help the country reach herd immunity, which would support the economic rebound. On the other, it raises privacy concerns and could risk a backlash or even litigation.”

Nonetheless, companies are starting to lean toward a pro-vaccination requirement. A new survey, conducted by Arizona State University’s College of Health Solutions with support from The Rockefeller Foundation, found that nearly 70% of U.S. and U.K. employers currently perform COVID-19 testing for their employees, and 90% intend to motivate or require vaccination. 

Those in favor of the requirement say they’ve seen one impressive payoff — that productivity and morale are up. A majority of employers said their employees’ engagement and productivity have gone up since the pandemic, and 44% report that employee morale has gone up. That’s compared to 26% indicating that morale went down since the pandemic began. 

Mental health and employee burnout had a devastating impact during the pandemic. Close to 80% of employers said the mental health of their workers has become a top priority since the pandemic started. Half the employers said they’re stepping up and making available company resources related to mental health.

To demonstrate how serious it’s taking the opportunity to be flying again, Delta Air Lines will require all new employees to be vaccinated against COVID-19...

Article Image

FAA approves latest round of Boeing 737 MAX fixes and will allow the aircraft to resume service

The never-ending saga of Boeing’s 737 MAX has a new chapter. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has given the aircraft manufacturer approval for an electrical fix and notified Southwest Airlines, American, United, and more than a dozen small international airlines that they can return more than 60 MAX jets to service.

Boeing alerted the FAA in early April that it was recommending that operators of certain Boeing 737 MAX airplanes temporarily ground the planes to address a manufacturing issue that could impact a backup power control unit. 

“After gaining final approvals from the FAA, we have issued service bulletins for the affected fleet,” Boeing told Reuters. “We are also completing the work as we prepare to resume deliveries.”

The news couldn’t come at a better time. With airlines trying to serve the pent-up demand of vaccinated wanderlusters and a beckoning summer travel season, they could use all the available planes they can get.

A pretty straightforward fix

Unlike Boeing’s past problems with the MAX, this one was pretty easy. In discussions with lawmakers, FAA Administrator Steve Dickson said that the electrical issue called for a “pretty straightforward fix.”

Dickson also gave Boeing — and the flying public — a shot of confidence by saying that he was convinced that the MAX models are safe, despite the aircraft’s past mechanical issues and fatal crashes.

Boeing hopes its MAX problems are finally behind it. The financial impact of the 737 MAX’s grounding created at least $18 billion in losses.

The never-ending saga of Boeing’s 737 MAX has a new chapter. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has given the aircraft manufacturer approval for an...

Article Image

Major airlines bring back change fees as pandemic restrictions are lifted

Now that COVID-19 restrictions are being lifted and airlines are filling up flights again, carriers are also bringing back fees as a way to generate revenue. Travelers who are anxious to jump on a flight and celebrate their escape from cabin fever should double-check terms and conditions before clicking the buy button. 

In fact, major domestic airlines have already reimplemented fare restrictions, particularly with basic economy fares. If you’re concerned that the pandemic may reignite, you’d be smart to book a flight at a higher fee level just for the sake of sanity and flexibility.  

Fee waiver updates

If you’re a bargain shopper and want to book a flight now, here are the fee changes you should look for:

American Airlines: The first to flip the switch on waivers was American. The company reverted back to making basic economy fares non-changeable and non-refundable for tickets bought on or after April 1, 2021. However, the airline is leaving the change fee waiver in place for all domestic, short-haul international, and select long-haul international flying on Premium Cabin, Premium Economy, and Main Cabin fares.

Delta Air Lines: For travelers who purchased a Basic Economy ticket under Delta’s COVID-19 travel waivers on or before April 30, 2021, you can still make changes or cancel your ticket and receive an eCredit (not a full cash refund). All Basic Economy fares purchased after April 30, 2021, are final, meaning these tickets are not changeable or refundable and you will not receive an eCredit upon cancellation. Delta did include one caveat about Basic Economy tickets originating from Europe, Africa, and other international markets. Those “may be changeable for a fee.”

United Airlines: Basic Economy fee waivers have also been scrapped by United, but other fare levels are still waiver-worthy. “We’re permanently getting rid of change fees for most Economy and premium cabin tickets for travel within the U.S. This includes Alaska, Hawaii, Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands,” the company stated. “There also won't be change fees for other international travel originating in the U.S.”

However, the carrier did leave the door on Basic Economy fee waivers slightly ajar. It stated that “most Basic Economy tickets are excluded” and that travelers “may be able to request a refund online or by contacting us if your flight has been affected by a significant schedule change or if your flight was canceled without another option.”

Now that COVID-19 restrictions are being lifted and airlines are filling up flights again, carriers are also bringing back fees as a way to generate revenu...

Article Image

FAA reports that unruly behavior aboard flights is at an all-time high

Believe it or not, a great number of people are still acting up onboard airplanes. 

The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) said it has received close to 1,300 reports of unruly passengers since February. That figure represents an all-time high for unruly behavior -- an interesting twist given the fact that fewer people are traveling because of the pandemic.

In a normal, non-pandemic year, the FAA usually gets somewhere between 100 and 150 reports of poor passenger behavior. 

What does bad behavior look like?

Of the 1,300 reports, the FAA identified 260 potential violations and initiated approximately 20 enforcement cases to put those passengers on notice. Among those 20 cases, the FAA shared details of three passengers that it plans to fine for allegedly interfering with or assaulting flight attendants who instructed them to obey cabin crew instruction and various federal regulations.

On a JetBlue flight from Haiti to Boston, Massachusetts, the FAA alleges that a passenger drank alcohol that they brought onboard -- a definite no-no. When the passenger started yelling and waving his hands, other passengers complained and flight attendants stepped in. That’s where things got bad. The passenger allegedly grabbed the arms of two flight attendants during the flight, and the cabin crew needed to reseat surrounding passengers. The flight crew asked law enforcement to meet the aircraft at the arrival gate, and police escorted the passenger off the plane; they're being fined $31,750. 

Interestingly enough, there was another passenger on the same flight who did pretty much the same thing -- drinking personal alcohol and becoming unruly. The only thing that kept that traveler from being fined at the same level as the first passenger is that they “made motions” to strike a flight attendant but didn’t physically touch them. Their fine? $16,750.

Another incident the FAA shared involves a passenger -- and, again, their own liquor -- on a Jan. 14, 2021, SkyWest Airlines flight from Yuma, Arizona, to Dallas-Fort Worth, Texas. The FAA claims the passenger drank multiple 50 ml bottles of their own alcohol during the flight. After the passenger repeatedly turned around and tried to touch another person behind them, flight attendants moved the intoxicated traveler to another seat. However, the passenger continued to bother other nearby flyers after being moved. 

At one point, two off-duty law enforcement officers had to physically wrestle the passenger back into their seat, but they got up again and started to walk to the front of the aircraft. A flight attendant yelled at the passenger to sit back down, and the law enforcement officers sat behind them. As a result of the passenger’s behavior, the captain requested priority handling from air traffic control and asked that law enforcement meet the aircraft at the arrival gate. The fine for this person? $14,500.

Forewarned is forearmed

The FAA wants travelers to know that when it comes to behavior, it’s not putting up with any nonsense. In fact, the FAA’s unruly-passenger zero-tolerance policy has been extended until further notice.

“The policy directs our safety inspectors and attorneys to take strong enforcement action against any passenger who disrupts or threatens the safety of a flight, with penalties ranging from fines to jail time. The number of cases we’re seeing is still far too high, and it tells us urgent action continues to be required,” FAA Administrator Steve Dickson said in a statement.

At the same time, the Transportation and Safety Authority (TSA) extended its mask mandate and said it will act accordingly against those who violate it. The existing civil penalty fine structure starts at $250 and rises to $1,500 for repeat offenders who violate the rule.

Believe it or not, a great number of people are still acting up onboard airplanes. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) said it has received close...

Article Image

United Airlines says thanks to healthcare workers by giving away four million miles

As a way of saying thanks to essential healthcare workers who have given their all during the pandemic, United Airlines is giving away millions of miles. The promotion -- tied to the airline’s 40th anniversary of its MileagePlus program -- will award four lucky members of the medical community with a million miles each to go wherever they want and enjoy a well-earned vacation.

"Throughout the past forty years, MileagePlus has evolved to meet the ever-changing needs of our members as well as reward their loyalty," said Luc Bondar, vice president of marketing & loyalty and president of MileagePlus at United. 

"That's why we celebrate this major milestone by offering our members generous promotions throughout May. We're also taking this occasion to launch the contest to show appreciation for the healthcare workers who stepped up to protect our communities during the pandemic."

How to enter

This is not a simple sign-up online type of contest; it requires a bit of championing for a healthcare worker who went the extra mile during the COVID-19 pandemic.

There are certain things that United’s panel of judges -- all members of the medical community -- will be looking for when it comes to nominations. Specifically, the person submitting the nomination needs to prove that the nominee went above and beyond to make a difference for their community and embody some of United's core values including:

  • Safe: They make the world a safer place for everyone around them.

  • Caring: The nominee shows appreciation for all members of their community by being welcoming, kind, and compassionate.

  • Dependable: They're the person you can rely on for anything, be it big or small.

  • Determined and Efficient: They keep things moving forward even when the going gets tough.

The deadline to enter the contest is May 17, 2021, so time is of the essence. To nominate an essential healthcare worker and for the full contest terms, consumers can visit united.com/essentialthanks and write a short explanation about why this person deserves recognition. 

Deals for non-healthcare workers

Healthcare workers might be getting the big prize in United’s anniversary promotion, but the airline has something for non-healthcare workers too.  

MileagePlus members can get everything from double miles on eGift cards to a 40% bonus when members buy miles. Complete details on the dates and procedures of the promotion are available here. 

As a way of saying thanks to essential healthcare workers who have given their all during the pandemic, United Airlines is giving away millions of miles. T...

Article Image

Southwest Airlines adds Buy Now, Pay Later as a ticket purchase option

Buy Now, Pay Later -- one of the darlings of the personal credit world -- got a boost on Wednesday when Uplift announced a new deal with Southwest Airlines to offer travelers an added financing option at checkout. 

Starting immediately, customers can book a flight on Southwest to more than 100 domestic and international destinations and take advantage of the new flexible payment options. Travelers will be able to see them for purchases as low as $100.

Both parties cited an example where a $300 flight could be spread over 11 months at $29 a month with $0 down, which would make the total cost of the flight $319. Mind you, that’s only an example. The actual terms are based on the customer's credit score and other factors. The companies also noted that not everyone is eligible, and some states are not served, including Iowa and West Virginia.

"Southwest Airlines is one of America's most beloved airlines, with a strong brand reputation based on a spirit of freedom and empowering customers with affordable travel," said Brian Barth, CEO of Uplift. "For travelers who already appreciate the low fares and world-renowned hospitality that Southwest is known for, the payment flexibility of Uplift's Buy Now, Pay Later solutions will be another addition to Southwest's customer-friendly offerings."

Driven by pent-up demand

With COVID-19 restrictions starting to ease in the U.S. and vaccinations continuing to rise, there is a pent-up demand for finally being able to jump on an airplane and go somewhere after more than a year of laying low. 

That’s not only good for airlines but for finance companies like Uplift that can make an escape more affordable. Business is good for Uplift. It’s signed partnership deals with several domestic airlines, including Alaska Airlines, United, Allegiant, Spirit, and Frontier.

“Buy Now, Pay Later (BNPL) services like Uplift are definitely having a moment,” travel expert Sara Rathner told ConsumerAffairs. “Yes, any time you take on debt, it’s a bit scary, and depending on the payment service and options you can choose from, you may be subject to fees or interest on your purchases. However, there’s transparency. You know exactly how much a purchase will cost you before you agree to the payment plan.”

Rathner said the sweet spot for consumers is unexpected, last-minute travel where fares are higher. She said that services like Uplift make those situations a little less troublesome and a little more affordable.

“Of course, take care to avoid getting in over your head. Keep your other monthly obligations in mind when you add on paying over time for a purchase. If you already struggle to afford your bills, it may not be the right time to add more to your plate unless you’re experiencing an emergency,” Rathner stated.

Beware of overusing BNPL

While higher conversion rates and an improved customer experience are good for retailers who offer BNPL, consumers should be cautious about using that option to satisfy their whims. 

“While they are marketed as consumer-friendly finance products, [one] drawback of BNPL is that it often encourages customers to purchase more products than they can afford,” said Martha Pearson, a Content Marketing Manager at Finturf. “This can put consumers in a difficult financial situation, and even hurt their credit scores if they are unable to pay on time.” 

Buy Now, Pay Later -- one of the darlings of the personal credit world -- got a boost on Wednesday when Uplift announced a new deal with Southwest Airlines...

Article Image

ConsumerAffairs reviewers rate Southwest as the top airline in the first quarter

With the economy beginning to reopen and COVID-19 vaccinations continuing to trend upward, cabin fever is giving way to wanderlust, and people are starting to make travel plans. As a result, airlines are reaping the rewards, with over 80% of consumers saying they plan to travel this year.

But which airline is going to give travelers the best experience when they return to the air? While you can take the carriers’ word for it, why not check in with actual consumers to see what they have to say on the matter?

To find out which airlines are producing the best travel experiences, ConsumerAffairs turned to our own review-driven data. After all, if someone really likes -- or hates -- a product or service, they’re more likely to tell their story.

Southwest comes out on top

According to consumers posting reviews at ConsumerAffairs, Southwest Airlines came out as the clear winner in the first quarter of 2021. The budget airline cautiously added more flights, deployed more aircraft, and brought back furloughed staff. Those efforts have paid off handsomely in the review department.

Southwest earned five-star reviews 72.9% of the time during the first three months of the year. On the other end of the ratings measuring stick, it only received one-star reviews 8.3% of the time, the same percentage as its three-star reviews. 

One of the consumers giving Southwest a five-star review was Jennifer, from Rockford, Illinois.

“I hadn’t flown in years, so I was a little anxious, and on top of coronavirus, we had to sit accordingly, and I have extra weight on me so it was hard to sit in a seat with minimal legroom for 2 hours!” she wrote in her ConsumerAffairs post. “But the airline attendees were fantastic, they just went on doing everything normally and catering to all of our needs. I felt very relaxed with them showing us they were in charge and assured of our flight! And the trip home was even better!”

All told, based on 1,685 ratings submitted in the last year on ConsumerAffairs, Southwest earns just shy of an overall four-star rating.

The runners-up

Delta Airlines and Alaska Airlines were neck and neck for the second spot in our reviewers’ overall opinion. Delta’s five-star reviews made up 52.2% of its total, with Alaska Airlines just a hair shy of that at 52.1%. 

But when four-star reviews are added to the mix, Delta takes off and leaves all other airlines in the dust. Delta’s four-star reviews made up 20.4% of its total reviews, while Alaska Airlines’ four-star reviews accounted for 17.3% of its total.

Taking into account the 1,764 ratings consumers submitted to ConsumerAffairs about Delta in the last year, it earns an overall four-star rating. While the total number of ratings submitted for Alaska Airlines is considerably smaller (474), the love that reviewers gave them was just as strong as Delta’s customers, earning Alaska a four-star rating as well.

Kind of good, but kind of bad too

While it appears that Southwest, Delta, and Alaska got most of ConsumerAffairs reviewers’ love, it doesn’t mean that others were besieged by bad reviews. In fact, a couple of airlines got great reviews, but they were also beset with some reviews that dragged down their overall scores. 

Take JetBlue, for example. It received a five-star review 45.8% of the time. However, it also received a one-star review 33.3% of the time. It’s not alone when it comes to that disparity. Allegiant Airlines was deemed worthy of five-star reviews 41.8% of the time but was besieged by one-star reviews 35.7% of the time.

Budget carriers such as Allegiant Airlines are dependent on fees to keep them in the green, and asking for as much as $80 for seat selection, $5 to print out a boarding pass, and $14.99 to purchase a ticket on a phone rather than online can get old. Just ask Michelle of Summerville, South Carolina.

“It was my first and LAST flight with them,” Anderson wrote. “They cost me additional fees in parking and my rental car and had the nerve to charge me a double fee for an extra bag bc I had already checked in on the app and it wouldn’t let me add a bag. The kind woman at check in waived the $50 exorbitant fee and the aid at the gate stopped me and took my bag and made me pay it at boarding.”

There are people who fly budget airlines, know exactly what they’re getting, and are happy to live without the frills as long as they get a good deal -- people like Joy from Pittsburgh, who appears to have flown Allegiant several times and still gives it a five-star review.

“Great airline with great prices. I have never had to wait for a flight and we have always been on time or sometimes early. The flight crews have always [been] very friendly and helpful. I would recommend this airline to my friends,” Joy wrote.

Two major airlines fall short

To our surprise, there are two large and successful airlines that have some work to do in the ratings department: American and United.

United Airlines’ one-star reviews were higher than its three-, four-, and five-star ratings combined. One-star reviews made up 47% of United’s totals, while its three levels of favorable reviews only added up to 45.1% of the total.

One of United’s three-star reviews came from Bill of Germantown, Maryland. “It always seems as if I'm playing air travel roulette when I fly United - will the airplane depart on time to make connections or not. The last time I flew I had to run from one concourse to another in DIA (Washington Dulles). Not fun,” he wrote.

As for American, ConsumerAffairs readers gave the Dallas-based carrier a one-star rating 43.1% of the time. That compares to 29.4% for five-star reviews and 18.8% for four-star reviews.

While Spirit Airlines doesn’t have the history that United and American do, its pre-pandemic passenger load of more than 34 million passengers a year was impressive enough to rank seventh out of all U.S. airlines in that metric. Its “Less Money, More Go” tagline might be putting people in seats, but ConsumerAffairs reviews show that not everyone is happy with the company’s business model.

Not only did Spirit amass the lowest percentage of five-star ratings -- 5.5% -- but it also racked up the highest number of one-star ratings at 69.4%. If the airline is looking for a reason, it doesn't need to look any further than the one-star review Haley from Young America, Minnesota, gave the carrier.

“Booked a round trip flight in which Spirit would be our airline back home. I heard nothing from this airline apart from junk mail promoting deals,” Haley wrote. “When I went to check into our flight 24 hours before our departure, I found out that our flight no longer existed and they had moved our nonstop flight to a two stop flight that would take 9 additional hours with a 7 hour layover.”

Despite the poor first-quarter showing, Spirit Airlines earned just under a four-star rating from ConsumerAffairs readers based on 1,461 ratings submitted in the last year.

ConsumerAffairs verifies all reviews before they are published, and we require contact information to ensure our reviewers are real. We use intelligent software that helps us maintain the integrity of reviews, and our moderators read all reviews to verify quality and helpfulness.

Mark Huffman contributed to this article.

With the economy beginning to reopen and COVID-19 vaccinations continuing to trend upward, cabin fever is giving way to wanderlust, and people are starting...

Article Image

Boeing 737 MAX grounded again over electrical issue

Boeing has found its way back into the news cycle. Only a few months after the Federal Aviation Administration gave the company permission to restart production of its 737 MAX aircraft and allowed airlines to use them, hopes for a successful return have been dashed again.

The company recommended grounding a specific group of 737 MAX planes because of an electrical issue. Officials said they asked 16 airlines to verify “that a sufficient ground path exists for a component of the electrical power system” on certain MAX planes. 

Boeing said it has also made the FAA aware of this “production issue” and that it will provide “appropriate corrective actions” to the airlines that own the planes it’s identified as possibly having the electrical issue.

However, this is not the only issue relating to the 737 MAX that has recently come to light. Just last week, the FAA proposed an airworthiness directive concerning reported failures of the automatic shutoff system during refueling. 

Airlines make shifts to accommodate schedules

The largest domestic carriers that own MAX models -- American, United, and Southwest -- have removed more than 60 of the planes from service. Southwest confirmed that 30 of its 58 MAX jets were affected by Boeing’s notification. However, the carrier noted that 15 or fewer MAX jets are scheduled to fly each day. 

“Southwest anticipates minimal disruption to our operation, and we appreciate the understanding of our customers and employees as safety is always our uncompromising priority,” it said in a statement.

ConsumerAffairs asked Boeing if there was a way for travelers to make sure that the plane they’re scheduled on is not one of the ones identified as having potential issues. The company has not yet given a response.

Boeing has found its way back into the news cycle. Only a few months after the Federal Aviation Administration gave the company permission to restart produ...

Article Image

United Airlines to open flight school as travel picks back up

Earlier this month, United Airlines announced plans to hire hundreds of pilots to handle an expected increase in domestic travel. Now, the carrier says it will open up an entire flight school with the aim of training and hiring thousands of pilots by 2030.

In a press release, the company said it also has a diversity goal tied to the flight school: It wants half of all students to be women or “people of color.” It will also be providing financing options to students who may have difficulty paying for enrollment in the school. 

"Over the next decade, United will train 5,000 pilots who will be guaranteed a job with United, after they complete the requirements of the Aviate program – and our plan is for half of them to be women and people of color," said United Airlines CEO Scott Kirby. "We're excited that JPMorgan Chase has agreed to support our work to diversify our pilot ranks and create new opportunities for thousands of women and people of color who want to pursue a career in aviation."

United to bring back more flights next month

United became the first airline to own and operate its own flight school back in February 2020, but plans for the United Aviate Academy were put on hold because of the COVID-19 pandemic. But with air traffic increasing in recent weeks, company officials say they want to open up travel options and begin the long trek back to “normal.” 

“Internationally, in May United will fly more than 100% of its pre-pandemic schedule to Latin America compared to what it operated in 2019, including more flights to Mexico, the Caribbean, Central America and South America,” the company stated. “The airline also plans to resume flights between Chicago and Tokyo Haneda, resume passenger flights between New York/Newark and Milan and Rome, and restart service between Chicago and Amsterdam.

“In total, United plans to operate 52% of its overall schedule compared to May 2019, whereas in May 2020 United operated 14% of its overall schedule compared to May 2019.”

Earlier this month, United Airlines announced plans to hire hundreds of pilots to handle an expected increase in domestic travel. Now, the carrier says it...

Article Image

United Airlines to hire hundreds of pilots as domestic travel increases

Earlier this year, a United Airlines executive stated that the financial impact of the COVID-19 pandemic was even worse than the worst estimates anyone at the company thought possible. But it seems like those dark and troubled times may be coming to an end soon. 

Late last week, company officials reportedly told employees in a memo that the carrier would be hiring hundreds of pilots to keep up with demand for domestic air travel. The message was a sharp turnaround from last year when the company told tens of thousands of employees that furloughs would be likely in 2021.

“I’m excited to share that United will resume the pilot hiring process that was halted last year. We’ll restart with approximately 300 pilots who either had a new hire class date that was canceled or who had a 2020 conditional job offer,” said Bryan Quigley, United’s Senior Vice President of Flight Operations, in the memo.

Travelers are already returning to the air

There have already been signs that the airline industry is starting to return to “normal” after over a year in the pandemic doldrums. Last month, several airlines announced they were bringing back in-flight food and beverage services for select flights and customers.

If the recent holiday weekend is any indication, more passengers could soon be taking to the air to enjoy these amenities. The Transportation Security Administration reports that over 1.5 million travelers went through security checkpoints on Thursday and Friday leading into Easter weekend, and there were similar numbers reported for Sunday. For each of these days in 2020, when the pandemic first began, checkpoint visits were below 130,000 per day. 

Earlier this year, a United Airlines executive stated that the financial impact of the COVID-19 pandemic was even worse than the worst estimates anyone at...

Article Image

Delta Air Lines to allow travelers to return to middle seats on May 1

Airlines continue to cautiously get back to something resembling “normal.” Last week, several carriers announced they were bringing back in-flight services like beverages and snacks. Delta Air Lines also feels good enough about the safety measures that it added during the pandemic and the continued climb in vaccinations, so it’s returning middle seats to the sales queue effective May 1. 

The airline introduced the middle seat block in April 2020 and was the only airline to keep the change in place for a full year. CEO Ed Bastian said passengers have adapted well. 

“While Delta’s decision to block middle seats has given many customers a reason to choose Delta over the past year, the signature hospitality of our employees and the experiences they deliver to customers every day have also deepened their trust in our airline,” he said. 

“The relationships we’ve built, together with the knowledge that nearly 65 percent of those who flew Delta in 2019 anticipate having at least one dose of the COVID-19 vaccine by May 1, are what’s giving us the assurance to offer customers the ability to choose any seat on our aircraft, while also introducing new services, products and rewards to support the journey. We take great pride in the trust we’ve built with customers by listening and delivering on what they said was most important, and that is the approach you can continue to expect.” 

Masks aren’t going away

Although middle seats are returning, Delta is not letting its guard down completely. Face coverings and masks are still required, and the company isn’t letting up on its cleaning procedures. 

The company’s relationship with experts at the Mayo Clinic and Emory will remain unchanged, as will its partnership with Lysol-maker Reckitt. Internally, Delta will also continue to lean on the expertise of Dr. Henry Ting, who the company hired as its first Chief Health Officer. 

To prove how important health safety is to the airline, Delta is also installing onboard hand sanitizer stations and antimicrobial lavatory lighting. It’s also introducing contactless payment technology onboard to minimize touchpoints during the payment process, giving all customer-facing employees Lysol Disinfecting Wipes to clean areas at airports and on aircraft, and working with the Transportation Safety Administration (TSA) to make sure checkpoint cleanliness is up to par.

Airlines continue to cautiously get back to something resembling “normal.” Last week, several carriers announced they were bringing back in-flight services...

Article Image

Airlines are starting to bring back in-flight food and beverage service

Restrictions are starting to be eased as the number of COVID-19 vaccinations in the U.S. continues to rise. One example of that can be seen in the return of certain services aboard aircraft. 

Delta Air Lines, United Airlines, and Southwest Airlines have announced that they’re all bringing back some form of in-flight food and beverage service. Below you can find what those three major carriers now have to offer.

Southwest options

For Southwest travelers, it’s only water and soft drinks for the time being. Passengers on flights of 250 miles or longer can choose from Coke, Diet Coke, 7Up, or bottled water.

However, passengers flying Southwest should bone up on their non-verbal skills before taking off. Instead of the flight attendant asking for the passenger’s preference, the airline wants travelers to place their order using their phone.

Southwest told ConsumerAffairs that passengers can choose their drink by zooming in on a graphic of their choice on their phone while accessing the carrier’s online portal. An attendant will then verify the choice and bring the beverage. But what if a traveler doesn’t have a phone? No problem -- flight attendants will hold up a menu with numbered options and travelers can respond by holding up the number of fingers reflecting their choice.

Southwest is going the point-to-your-choice route because it wants to steer clear of any trouble. For now, the Transportation Safety Administration (TSA) still requires passengers to wear a mask while onboard an airplane.

Delta Air Lines’s updated food and beverage service

Starting April 14 on domestic flights, Delta will offer a revamped snack and beverage service that includes coffee, water, tea, soft drinks (in new 7.5 ounce cans, no less), and ready-to-drink old fashioned cocktails and margaritas. Travelers will need to pay a dollar more than before for these alcoholic drinks, though.

For snacks, Delta’s new selection has its traditional Biscoff cookies, plus Goldfish, almonds, and Clif Bars. Customers can have one sweet and one savory snack. 

Taking a hands-off approach like Southwest, Delta flight attendants will use the company’s new contactless payment technology for onboard purchases of food, beverages, and earbuds. The new system also allows for emailed receipts. 

United’s in-flight changes

United’s dining menu has also been retooled. Effective April 1 on select routes, the airline will offer fliers their choice of snack boxes, a la carte snacks, and a variety of alcoholic beverages.

Just about everyone on a United flight will have to pay for their food and drink. The exception is the “premium-cabin” passenger, who can enjoy alcoholic beverages for free. Among those options is White Claw, a new addition to United’s offerings. 

Everything will be exclusively contactless when United debuts its new food and beverage line-up, which means customers seated in Coach class will have to use the United app. 

Restrictions are starting to be eased as the number of COVID-19 vaccinations in the U.S. continues to rise. One example of that can be seen in the return o...

Article Image

Airline industry bristles over CDC guidance that vaccinated people should avoid travel

On Monday, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) was feeling a lot of love thanks to its guidance that gave vaccinated people the all-clear to visit each other indoors without a mask. Tuesday, however, is a different story. 

The CDC woke up to some pushback from the airline industry, which thinks the agency’s guidelines that fully vaccinated people should continue to avoid travel is unreasonable. A lobbying ground for the airline industry -- Airlines For America -- thinks that being onboard an airplane actually poses a low risk of being infected by the coronavirus due to mask mandates, intensive cleaning protocols, and the heavily filtered air that major airlines are employing. 

"We remain confident that this layered approach significantly reduces risk," the group said.

The CDC says it has its reasons

When CDC director Dr. Rochelle Walensky was asked what the agency’s scientific justification was for not changing the travel guidance so that folks who are fully vaccinated could travel, Walensky presented a strength in numbers viewpoint.

“In terms of travel, here’s what we know: Every time that there’s a surge in travel, we have a surge in cases in this country. We know that many of our variants have emerged from international places, and we know that the travel corridor is a place where people are mixing a lot,” Walensky said.

“We are really trying to restrain travel at this current period of time, and we’re hopeful that our next set of guidance will have more science around what vaccinated people can do, perhaps travel being among them.”

Walensky feels that this all-for-one, one-for-all approach is an important step in resuming a normal everyday life. 

“We remain in the midst of a serious pandemic and still over 90 percent of our population is not fully vaccinated, though we are working hard to get there. Therefore, everyone, whether vaccinated or not, should continue to avoid medium- and large-sized gatherings, as well as nonessential travel, and, when in public spaces, should continue to wear a well-fitted mask, physically distance, and follow other public health measures to protect themselves and others,” she said.

Follow guidance if you have to fly

The CDC fully understands that there are times that people have to fly somewhere. The agency just asks that travelers take a guarded approach. To help travelers make wise decisions, the CDC has put together a travel planner that gives feedback on health requirements and warnings for any destination. That planner is available here.

The U.S. State Department also produces an online planner for international travelers so that those planning overseas visits know what the health situation is for their destination. That travel planner is available here.

On Monday, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) was feeling a lot of love thanks to its guidance that gave vaccinated people the all-clear...

Article Image

Airline industry leaders tell Congress that they need more money to stay afloat

The case for giving the U.S. airline industry another serious shot in the arm was made on Capitol Hill on Tuesday. In testimony made to lawmakers, Nicholas E. Calio, President and CEO of Airlines for America (A4A), minced no words in asking for a third round of government assistance. 

“We are still struggling and in dire straits,” he told the House Transportation and Infrastructure’s aviation subcommittee. “We were hoping it would be better by now.”

The $1.9 trillion COVID-19 relief package that the U.S. House of Representatives approved last week includes a new infusion of $14 billion for passenger airlines to keep workers on payrolls for an additional six months. Calio says that $14 billion will help, but he warned the committee that tens of thousands of aviation workers will “lose their jobs — or experience reductions to wages and benefits — effective April 1” if a new round of assistance isn’t approved. 

Congress steps up for a third time, but will it again?

If the Senate rubber-stamps passage of the supplemental aid, it will be the third time Congress has come to the aid of airlines, airports, and aviation contractors. To date, Congress has made nearly $90 billion in assistance and loans available, including two previous rounds of payroll assistance amounting to $40 billion.

Joining Calio was Joseph DePete, president of the Air Line Pilots Association. He echoed Calio’s sentiment, telling committee members that “dismal long-term booking commitments and the near absence of business travel demand is leaving some carriers with too little certainty to reactivate and retrain furloughed or otherwise inactive pilots.”

According to testimony seen by Reuters, Representative Peter DeFazio (D-OR), chair of the Transportation committee, said he is “hoping by September 30 we are not going to need another extension” of airline payroll assistance.

From bad to worse

Adding to Calio’s and DePete’s warnings, the International Air Transport Association (IATA) announced that passenger traffic fell in January 2021, not only compared to pre-pandemic levels (January 2019) but also compared to the immediate month prior (December 2020).

Domestic travel took quite a punch, dropping by 47.4 percent year-over-year. However, the impact was really felt on the international level, where passenger demand in January was 85.6 percent below January 2019.

“2021 is starting off worse than 2020 ended and that is saying a lot. Even as vaccination programs gather pace, new COVID variants are leading governments to increase travel restrictions. The uncertainty around how long these restrictions will last also has an impact on future travel. Forward bookings in February this year for the Northern Hemisphere summer travel season were 78 percent below levels in February 2019,” said Alexandre de Juniac, IATA’s Director General and CEO.

De Juniac parroted the need for government financial support, but he said the real keys for governments to unlock economic activity -- including travel -- are increased testing capability and vaccine distribution. 

“It is critical that governments build and share their restart plans along with the benchmarks that will guide them. This will enable the industry to be prepared to energize the recovery without any unnecessary delay,” the executive said.

The case for giving the U.S. airline industry another serious shot in the arm was made on Capitol Hill on Tuesday. In testimony made to lawmakers, Nicholas...

Article Image

Boeing 777 engine failure over Denver was caused by ‘metal fatigue,’ NTSB suggests

A preliminary investigation into the recent engine failure of a Boeing 777 has indicated that the damage was “consistent with metal fatigue.” 

In a statement, the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) said an initial examination of the Pratt & Whitney engine that failed just a few minutes into a United Airlines flight revealed: 

  • The inlet and cowling separated from the engine;

  • Two fan blades were fractured;

  • One fan blade was fractured near the root;

  • An adjacent fan blade was fractured about mid-span;

  • A portion of one blade was imbedded in the containment ring; and

  • The remainder of the fan blades showed damage to the tips and leading edges.

The PW4000 engine has 22 blades. Investigators said one of those blades was found lodged inside the plane’s containment ring, another landed in a soccer field in Colorado, and another broke free and hit another blade. 

What happened

On Saturday, a United Airlines flight heading from Colorado to Hawaii was forced to make an emergency landing after the engine failed. 

"The plane started shaking violently, and we lost altitude and we started going down," passenger David Delucia said, adding that he and his wife put their wallets in their pockets "in case we did go down, we could be ID'd".

In the wake of the incident, Boeing has recommended suspending the use of Boeing 777s powered by the Pratt & Whitney 4000 engine until the FAA establishes an inspection protocol. The FAA said Sunday that it would begin vigilantly investigating Boeing 777s with the engines in question. 

"We reviewed all available safety data following [Saturday's] incident," said FAA administrator Steve Dickson in a statement. "Based on the initial information, we concluded that the inspection interval should be stepped up for the hollow fan blades that are unique to this model of engine, used solely on Boeing 777 airplanes."

Pratt & Whitney said it’s “actively coordinating with operators and regulators to support the revised inspection interval” of the engines under investigation. "Any further investigative updates regarding this event will be at the discretion of the NTSB. Pratt & Whitney will continue to work to ensure the safe operation of the fleet."

A preliminary investigation into the recent engine failure of a Boeing 777 has indicated that the damage was “consistent with metal fatigue.” In a stat...

Article Image

Dozens of Boeing 777 aircraft grounded after Denver engine failure incident

After a United Airlines-flown Boeing 777 failed and rained debris over Denver on Saturday, Boeing has recommended the grounding of all 69 in-service and 59 in-storage 777s powered by Pratt & Whitney 4000-112 engines until the FAA establishes an appropriate inspection protocol. 

United Flight 328, with 231 passengers aboard, was forced to make an emergency landing at Denver airport. No one was reported injured either on the plane or on the ground.

"The plane started shaking violently, and we lost altitude and we started going down," David Delucia said, adding that he and his wife put their wallets in their pockets "in case we did go down, we could be ID'd".

United suffered a near-identical engine failure on one of its 777s in 2018 on a flight from San Francisco to Honolulu.

Planes grounded and investigations started

If bad things come in threes, then Boeing has to hope that 2021 will be the last of its three-year-long sidelining. It spent 2019 and 2020 trying to recover from the issues and crashes revolving around its 737 MAX aircraft before finally resuming production of the model in Spring, 2020.

In the wake of Saturday’s incident, United immediately halted operations of 24 of its 777 aircraft. Japan’s Civil Aviation Bureau also grounded planes with the Pratt & Whitney engine on Monday, and Korean Air Lines and Asiana Airlines idled theirs without a government mandate.

Japan’s Civil Aviation Bureau has seen this situation before. The ministry reported that a Japan Air Lines (JAL) flight was forced to return to Naha Airport due to an engine malfunction In December 2020. Interestingly enough, the JAL plane was the same age -- 26-years-old -- as the United Airlines plane in Saturday's incident.

Addressing the situation, Boeing said it is “actively monitoring” the event that occurred in Denver. Pratt & Whitney said it had “dispatched a team to work with investigators.” On the U.S. government side, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) said it has ordered “extra” inspections of Boeing 777 jets fitted with the Pratt & Whitney 4000. 

"We reviewed all available safety data following [Saturday's] incident," said FAA administrator Steve Dickson in a statement. "Based on the initial information, we concluded that the inspection interval should be stepped up for the hollow fan blades that are unique to this model of engine, used solely on Boeing 777 airplanes."

The good and bad news about engine failure

How bad is losing an engine in an incident like United’s? A modern twin-engine airliner suffering engine failure is designed to fly safely for hours with only one functioning engine. An example is a 2017 Paris to L.A. incident in which the crew took the aircraft to a lower altitude and diverted to Goose Bay, Canada, where it landed safely two hours later. Nonetheless, there are potential problems involved with engine failure. 

“The shrapnel from an uncontained failure, however, can cause serious damage to the rest of the plane, and if it passes through the cabin, it can be lethal. Experts say the failure in the Denver incident appears to have been uncontained, but the damage to the aircraft itself was thankfully minor,” said BBC special correspondent, Theo Leggett.

Leggett said it is also worrisome that the incident appears to be markedly similar to the aforementioned United Airlines 2018 incident.

“If the cause in this case is found to be the same -- and remember, it may not be -- that would raise questions about why the response to that incident from the manufacturer and regulators was unable to prevent a repeat,” Leggett said.

After a United Airlines-flown Boeing 777 failed and rained debris over Denver on Saturday, Boeing has recommended the grounding of all 69 in-service and 59...

Article Image

Delta continues its middle-seat blocking program and rolls out new coronavirus-driven benefits

And then there was one. Delta Air Lines is now the only U.S. airline to block middle seats and limit capacity on all flights. On Tuesday, the company announced its intentions to keep things that way through April 30, 2021, in hopes of giving travelers a reason to feel safe as they book their spring travel.

While all airlines are anxious to get back to how they did things in the pre-pandemic world, Delta has taken a gradual approach. Over the past few months, the airline has relaunched things like its beer and wine service for first-class and Comfort+ passengers and reopened its Sky Club airport lounges.

As a bonus surprise to returning travelers, Delta has also been working on improving the flying experience during COVID-19. The airline says one of the new wrinkles passengers will see is more than 300 new in-flight entertainment options and high-speed Wi-Fi.

“We want our customers to have complete confidence when traveling with Delta, and they continue to tell us that more space provides more peace of mind,” said Bill Lentsch, Chief Customer Experience Officer. “We’ll continue to reassess seat blocking in relation to case transmission and vaccination rates, while bringing back products and services in ways that instill trust in the health and safety of everyone on board – that will always be Delta’s priority.” 

Other steps Delta is taking

On top of extending seat blocking commitments, Delta is taking other steps to cheer up customers as they return to travel. These include: 

COVID-19 testing: Delta says that it will be making it easier for passengers to understand testing requirements and get tested prior to travel, whether customers purchase an at-home test or find a nearby location for in-person testing. The company said there’ll be even more options in the coming months. 

The airline has also added new rapid testing centers at its hub airports in Minneapolis and Detroit. It already has testing facilities in place at Atlanta, Boston, New York-JFK, and Seattle. 

Destination requirements and restrictions: No matter where you fly, there are national or local rules in place for incoming travelers -- and they tend to change often. Delta has created an interactive travel map to help customers understand where Delta flies and the latest travel requirements or restrictions at their destination.  

Digital concierge: When ConsumerAffairs traveled to CES 2020, we witnessed Delta’s new concierge system. Even though the airline had no idea that there was a pandemic on the way, the nuance is a nice add-on in a stressful, pandemic-driven world. Via the Delta Air Lines app, the digital concierge anticipates customer needs, offers convenient services like a ride to the airport, and delivers thoughtful notifications to keep customers moving seamlessly on their journey.

An example of how the ride component works can be seen through Delta’s partnership with Lyft. The companies provide customers with multiple touchpoints within the Fly Delta app to give estimated arrival times powered by Lyft. The partnership also gives travelers the option of paying for rides by using miles.

Clean ambassadors: Delta has hired a dedicated team of “clean ambassadors” whose job it is to ensure a consistently safe and sanitized experience at more than 55 airports. 

Delta CareStandard: Tying everything together is Delta’s new CareStandard, which the company claims has more than 100 layers of protection to ensure a safe travel experience. Included in CareStandard is a comprehensive employee testing program, protocols for regularly sanitizing high-touch surfaces, and replacements for onboard industrial-grade HEPA filters twice as often as recommended. 

And then there was one. Delta Air Lines is now the only U.S. airline to block middle seats and limit capacity on all flights. On Tuesday, the company annou...

Article Image

American Airlines warns 13,000 employees to prepare for furloughs

American Airlines told its employees that when the federal aid it’s been living on expires on March 31, as many as 13,000 workers will likely be furloughed if labor unions are unable to raise more emergency funding from the government.

The $15 billion Payroll Support Program (PSP) package Congress approved for domestic air carriers in late 2020 required airlines to recall all employees they furloughed in the fall and maintain payroll through March 31.

American’s peer United Airlines also sent furlough warnings to 14,000 staff members last week.

Even pilots are affected

The furlough notices covered every aspect of American’s workforce, including 4,245 of its flight attendants, 3,145 fleet service workers, 1,850 pilots, 1,420 maintenance workers, 1,205 in passenger service, 100 dispatchers, and 40 flight crew training and simulator pilot instructors, according to an American Airlines securities filing.

American is the only major U.S. carrier to furlough pilots. Delta, United, and Jetblue previously cut deals with pilot unions that kept the pilots' jobs in place in exchange for reduced flying or pay. Southwest told its pilots that they also run the risk of being furloughed in March or April. 

In its filing, American also announced that it will open a voluntary early-out program (VEOP) and a long-term voluntary leave of absence (VLOA) program for the company’s U.S.-based team members, but not its pilots. The benefits offered through those programs include everything from non-revenue travel privileges and partial pay up to $150,000 in a Retiree Health Reimbursement Arrangement.

The Allied Pilots Association (APA), American Airlines pilots’ union, was thrown off by American’s move to furlough pilots. “Although we recognize (American Airlines) CEO Doug Parker’s efforts when he joined APA on Capitol Hill for PSP, today’s news does come with some head-scratching,” APA brass wrote in response to American’s announcement.

“While perhaps not unexpected due to near-term passenger demand, the announcement seems to contradict recent comments by President Robert Isom, who said during last week’s earnings call that, due to retirements, American would ‘be hiring pilots in the not-too-distant future,’ the organization said.

“We owe you transparency”

With constantly changing guidance and rules for travelers regarding masks, international travel, and COVID-19 tests, the airline industry probably suffers more pandemic-led economic turbulence than any other business sector. 

“The vaccine is not being distributed as quickly as any of us believed, and new restrictions on international travel that require customers to have a negative COVID-19 test have dampened demand,” American’s CEO Doug Parker and President Robert Isom wrote in a note to staff. “Please know that we will get through this period and to more stable ground — that is certain. And, we will continue to fight in every way possible to get there as soon as we can.”

“Until demand returns and we can provide permanent job stability, we owe you transparency. That is what we can offer today and what we will continue to provide. Thank you for all you continue to do for each other, our customers and our airline,” the officials said.

American Airlines told its employees that when the federal aid it’s been living on expires on March 31, as many as 13,000 workers will likely be furloughed...

Article Image

Southwest bans emotional support animals in cabins

Southwest announced Monday that it will no longer accept emotional support animals on flights beginning March 1. The company’s decision is in line with new regulations from the Department of Transportation (DOT) regarding trained service animals and emotional support animals. 

Late last year, the DOT reversed a rule that provided significant room for interpretation on what could be considered an emotional support animal. Some airlines claimed that passengers were claiming that their pet was for emotional support in order to avoid pet fees.

"We applaud the Department of Transportation's recent ruling that allows us to make these important changes to address numerous concerns raised by the public and airline employees regarding the transport of untrained animals in the cabins of aircraft," Steve Goldberg, Southwest’s Senior Vice President, Operations and Hospitality, said in a statement. 

Trained service dogs allowed

Going forward, the airline says it will only accept properly trained service dogs in cabins. 

"Southwest Airlines continues to support the ability of qualified individuals with a disability to bring trained service dogs for travel and remains committed to providing a positive and accessible travel experience for all of our Customers with disabilities,” Goldberg said.

Service dogs that will be allowed on flights will have to be trained to do work or perform tasks for people with disabilities including “ a physical, sensory, psychiatric, intellectual, or other mental disability,” Southwest said. 

“Only dogs will be accepted (including those for psychiatric service) — no other species will be accepted as a trained service animal,” the airline added. 

Travelers who want to bring their non-service dog or cat on board as a pet will be required to pay a fee, and the animal must be kept in a carrier that fits under their seat. Southwest is reportedly the last major U.S. airline to ban emotional-support animals following the DOT’s policy change. 

Southwest announced Monday that it will no longer accept emotional support animals on flights beginning March 1. The company’s decision is in line with new...

Article Image

United Airlines CFO says financial impact of COVID-19 was as bad as it gets

When the man who counts the money says things are bad, you better listen. United Airlines CFO Gerry Laderman says the financial whammy that COVID-19 put on the company was worse than the worst-case-possible scenario that the company had imagined. 

“We weren’t even close,” Laderman commented during United Airlines’ earnings call on Thursday. “Before COVID, we modeled our worst-case scenarios based on the financial impact of 9/11, followed by a recession,” Laderman said. 

The red ink Laderman said the company recorded over the course of 2020 was a loss of $9.9 billion.

No more “return to normal”

United Airlines CEO Scott J. Kirby said that the company was luckier than other carriers because it was “the first airline to recognize the potential severity of COVID-19.” That gave it a leg up on the competition in being able to manage cash flow further out. Had executives not cut fourth-quarter operating expenses by 42 percent year-over-year, who knows how much further the bottom line would have fallen. 

“As we recover from this crisis, we've stopped using the term ‘return to normal’ because it creates an environment where it's just too easy to go back to doing what we were doing before,” Kirby said. “Instead, we want to focus on a return-to-new approach that applies to a wide variety of goals. When this is over, our employees, customers, the general public, and shareholders will see a new United Airlines.”

United is ready if this happens again

If something the size of a pandemic happens again, Laderman says the airline should be ready. “Going forward, we will focus on being ready for sustained destruction of global air travel demand like we are seeing today,” he said.

As company brass watched the company’s 2020 losses mount, “managing liquidity and cash flow became far more important than any other financial metric,” Laderman said, adding that the recovery process could take years. He added that liquidity and debt reduction will be tantamount to success. 

Years? Yes. When the pandemic was still in its infancy, the International Air Transport Association (IATA) took a long look at the global airline industry’s post-pandemic life and estimated that things might not return to normal until 2023. United anticipates being ready if something this catastrophic happens again.

“If anything [we have the] confidence that by 2023 at the latest, though possibly earlier depending on the pace of demand recovery, our [gross earnings] margins … will exceed 2019 levels. [But] I’d just say that nobody, including us, has a perfect crystal ball on how soon this really will be over,” Kirby said.

When the man who counts the money says things are bad, you better listen. United Airlines CFO Gerry Laderman says the financial whammy that COVID-19 put on...

Article Image

FAA throws down the hammer with new rules on unruly airline passengers

If you plan on flying anytime soon, don’t act like a fool. The Federal Aviation Administration’s (FAA) Administrator Steve Dickson has signed an order directing a harsher legal enforcement policy against unruly airline passengers. The move comes in the wake of recent episodes where airline passengers have disrupted flights with threatening or violent behavior, as well as cases in which some passengers refused to wear masks onboard a flight.

The move follows the Department of Transportation’s (DOT) new set of standards for determining whether an airline was being unfair or deceptive in dealing with passengers. 

“Flying is the safest mode of transportation and I signed this order to keep it that way,” Dickson said.

Be prepared to write a check for $35,000 if you act up

Up to now, the FAA has had a more lenient way of addressing unruly-passenger incidents by using a mix of warnings, counseling, and civil penalties. Dickson said the kid gloves are off now. Effective immediately, the FAA is getting rid of the simple warning or required counseling. Instead, the agency will pursue legal enforcement action against any passenger who “assaults, threatens, intimidates, or interferes with airline crew members.” 

If a passenger acts up in any fashion that crosses that warning line, they should be prepared to pay a fine of up to $35,000 and possibly spend time in prison on top of that. 

This policy will be in effect through March 30, 2021.

Don’t test the FAA

Dickson reminds the flying public that the FAA monitors and tracks all commercial passenger flights in real-time, and it has reporting mechanisms in place for crew members to identify any safety and security concerns that may arise in flight. 

“We have zero tolerance for threatening or violent behavior by passengers, and we will take the strongest possible enforcement action against any passenger who engages in it,” he said.

Airlines for America (A4A), an advocacy group representing the aviation industry, praised Dickson for the FAA’s assertiveness. 

“The safety and security of passengers and employees is always the top priority of the U.S. airline industry, and we welcome the FAA’s order to implement a more stringent policy regarding unruly passenger behavior,” A4A President and CEO Nicholas E. Calio said. “We cannot have any form of dangerous behavior that threatens the safety of passengers and crew members.”

If you plan on flying anytime soon, don’t act like a fool. The Federal Aviation Administration’s (FAA) Administrator Steve Dickson has signed an order dire...

Article Image

Frontier joins other airlines in banning emotional support animals from flights

Airlines continue to take a hard line against emotional support animals. Frontier Airlines is joining Delta Air Lines, American Airlines, and Alaska Airlines in adopting new Department of Transportation (DOT) rules. 

The Denver-based carrier announced that it will no longer accept reservations for emotional support animals on any of its flights for all reservations booked on or after January 11, 2021, and for all flights departing on or after February 1, 2021

The DOT was getting gamed

The DOT said it was in a tough spot because the laundry list of concerns tied to emotional support animals raised by the airline industry, disabilities rights groups, and customers was growing out of control. Travelers have to bear some of the responsibility for why the DOT had to do what it did in closing all the loopholes its previous policy had left open to abuse.

“Airline employees will tell you that people with real disabilities present few problems in the airport environment,” the agency said. “Those abusing these policies are often easy to spot — their animals are often clearly pets and treated as such, are usually untrained for any service, the passenger often makes a big deal about it, and they generally stand out.”

“Those with real disabilities and real service animals benefit greatly from this change since it will reduce or eliminate those trying to appropriate their ADA benefit. Flight Attendants, too, undoubtedly see this as an improvement.”

Service dogs are still permitted

While it’s cutting off emotional support animals, Frontier will continue to transport service dogs specifically trained to support a qualified individual with a disability. The airline’s changes to its service animal policy are as follows:

  • Paperwork. Customers traveling with a service dog must complete and submit the DOT’s Service Animal Air Transportation Form, attesting to the dog’s health, behavior, and training. For reservations booked more than 48 hours prior to travel, customers must submit the completed form no later than 48 hours prior to travel. For reservations booked less than 48 hours prior to travel, customers must submit the completed form in person to a Customer Service Agent upon arrival at the airport.

  • What about animals other than dogs? For service animals booked prior to January 11, 2021, for travel through January 31, 2021, Frontier will transport dogs, cats, and miniature horses that have received training (including as a psychiatric service animal) to assist a qualified individual with a disability.

  • Maximum number of animals allowed. Under the new policy, the maximum number of service animals traveling with a single passenger with a disability is two.

  • What happens if a service animal “acts up.” A trained service animal that engages in disruptive behavior or poses a direct threat to the health or safety of others may be denied boarding.

  • What about animals who don’t qualify? Animals who do not qualify as trained service animals may still be eligible to travel for a fee in accordance with Frontier’s Pet Policy.

Airlines continue to take a hard line against emotional support animals. Frontier Airlines is joining Delta Air Lines, American Airlines, and Alaska Airlin...

Article Image

Southwest Airlines launches fare sale with one-way tickets starting at $29

Southwest Airlines kicked off 2021 with a huge fare sale that features $29 one-way fares -- $10-20 less than its previous promotional deals. It’s one of those if-you-want-it-act-now promotions because it only lasts through January 7, and it also only applies to certain markets, seats, and available days; a 21-day advance purchase is also required. 

The company avoided the subject of the coronavirus pandemic in its announcement, opting to focus more on spring travel when more people will have been immunized.

"Southwest is ready to take Customers to their favorite spring travel destinations," said Bill Tierney, Southwest Vice President of Marketing. "Whether it is hitting the slopes or soaking up the sun on the beach, Southwest is your ticket to the perfect getaway. With our legendary Hospitality, flexible policies, and low fares across our expanding network, we look forward to having our Customers onboard again when they are ready to get away."

Where will $29 get you?

The key to any of these deals is watching for trigger words and phrases like “as low as.” In Southwest-ese, its “as low as” includes $29 deals between:

  • Atlanta and Raleigh/Durham

  • Denver and Salt Lake City

  • Phoenix and Palm Springs

  • Boston and Baltimore/Washington

However, for $10 more -- $39 -- a one-way ticket between Dallas and New Orleans is available. Paying $89 will get someone from Nashville to Sarasota, and a $99 fare will be available for anyone traveling from San Diego to Hawaii. That last trip appears to be a particularly good deal. When ConsumerAffairs ran searches on Google Flights, most San Diego-Hawaii non-stop fares ranged from $124 to $159.

Southwest was very direct about its fare sale, saying there is “fine print galore.” And that there is. The biggest caveat is that the cheapest tickets are generally available for travel only on Tuesdays and Wednesdays and for nonstop flights within the continental U.S. Sale fares for flights to Hawaii, Mexico and Puerto Rico are generally offered on more days of the week.

Southwest Airlines kicked off 2021 with a huge fare sale that features $29 one-way fares -- $10-20 less than its previous promotional deals. It’s one of th...

Article Image

Qantas Airlines once again takes home the ‘world’s safest’ airline prize

Australia’s Qantas Airlines threw some extra shrimp on the barbie on Monday, as it learned it’s been named the “world’s safest airline” once again. 

AirlineRatings.com editors applauded the 100-year old Qantas for amassing a record of firsts in both operations and safety. 

“The Australian airline has been a clear leader in the development of Future Air Navigation System; real-time monitoring of its engines across its fleet, the flight data recorder to monitor plane and later crew performance; automatic landings using Global Navigation Satellite System as well as precision approaches around mountains in the cloud using RNP (Required Navigation Performance),” said AirlineRatings Christine Forbes Smith. Smith noted that Qantas has been either first or second to roll out the 16 major safety enhancements introduced in the past 60 years.

The Top 20

In evaluating an airline’s safety, AirlineRatings.com took an exhaustive range of factors into account, including: airline’s crash and serious incident record, government audits, audits from aviation’s governing and industry bodies, industry-leading safety initiatives, and fleet age.

Here’s how the researchers ranked its who’s who:

  1. Qantas

  2. Qatar Airways

  3. Air New Zealand

  4. Singapore Airlines

  5. Emirates

  6. EVA Air

  7. Etihad Airways

  8. Alaska Airlines

  9. Cathay Pacific Airways

  10. British Airways

  11. Virgin Australia/Virgin Atlantic

  12. Hawaiian Airlines

  13. Southwest Airlines

  14. Delta Air Lines

  15. American Airlines

  16. SAS

  17. Finnair

  18. Lufthansa

  19. KLM

  20. United Airlines

Despite Qantas sitting atop the field and United bringing up the rear, AirlineRatings.com editor-in-chief Geoffrey Thomas said that, in reality, there’s not as much disparity as it seems between #1 and #20.

“These airlines are standouts in the industry and are at the forefront of safety, innovation, and launching of new aircraft. In fact, there is very little between the top 20, they are all standouts,” Mr. Thomas said.

In the past, low-cost carriers have been excluded in the rankings. But in response to public interest, AirlineRatings.com editors decided to include them this time around. Their Top 10 safest & best low-cost airlines are as follows in alphabetical order: Air Arabia, Allegiant, easyjet, Frontier, Jetstar Group, Jetblue, Ryanair, Vietjet, Westjet, and Wizz.

Australia’s Qantas Airlines threw some extra shrimp on the barbie on Monday, as it learned it’s been named the “world’s safest airline” once again. Air...

Article Image

Alaska Airlines becomes the first U.S. airline to adhere to new DOT rules on emotional support animals

In a move to reflect recent changes to the U.S. Department of Transportation's (DOT) rules regarding emotional support animals on its flights, Alaska Airlines will no longer allow those pets to board. Effective January 11, 2021, Alaska will only transport service dogs, given their ability to perform tasks for an individual with a disability. 

The DOT’s recent changes come out more than 15,000 comments to the agency’s notice of proposed rulemaking. It said its final determination “addresses concerns raised by individuals with disabilities, airlines, flight attendants, airports, other aviation transportation stakeholders, and other members of the public, regarding service animals on aircraft.” 

Welcome news

The emotional support animal issue has been a push-and-pull for nearly two years, with some major U.S. airlines -- including JetBlue, Delta, and Southwest -- either modifying or completely ditching their rules on what is and what isn’t a quantifiable “emotional support animal.”

At Alaska Airlines, the change brought a huge sigh of relief. 

"This regulatory change is welcome news, as it will help us reduce disturbances onboard, while continuing to accommodate our guests traveling with qualified service animals," said Ray Prentice, director of customer advocacy at Alaska Airlines.

The changes

As airlines start adhering to the new DOT policy, there will no doubt be some variation on the finer points, but every carrier will have to follow these basic requirements listed in the final rule:

  • “Defines a service animal as a dog that is individually trained to do work or perform tasks for the benefit of a person with a disability;

  • No longer considers an emotional support animal to be a service animal;

  • Requires airlines to treat psychiatric service animals the same as other service animals;

  • Allows airlines to require forms developed by DOT attesting to a service animal’s health, behavior and training, and if taking a long flight attesting that the service animal can either not relieve itself, or can relieve itself in a sanitary manner;

  • Allows airlines to require individuals traveling with a service animal to provide the DOT service animal form(s) up to 48 hours in advance of the date of travel if the passenger’s reservation was made prior to that time;

  • Prohibits airlines from requiring passengers with a disability who are traveling with a service animal to physically check-in at the airport instead of using the online check-in process;  

  • Allows airlines to require a person with a disability seeking to travel with a service animal to provide the DOT service animal form(s) at the passenger’s departure gate on the date of travel;

  • Allows airlines to limit the number of service animals traveling with a single passenger with a disability to two service animals; 

  • Allows airlines to require a service animal to fit within its handler’s foot space on the aircraft;

  • Allows airlines to require that service animals be harnessed, leashed, or tethered at all times in the airport and on the aircraft;

  • Continues to allow airlines to refuse transportation to service animals that exhibit aggressive behavior and that pose a direct threat to the health or safety of others; and

  • Continues to prohibit airlines from refusing to transport a service animal solely based on breed.”

In Alaska’s revised policy, the airline will accept a maximum of two service dogs per guest in the cabin. That includes psychiatric service dogs, which the DOT now requires airlines to treat the same as other service animals. Alaska passengers will be required to complete a DOT form, which will be available on AlaskaAir.com beginning January 11, certifying that their animal is a legitimate service dog, is trained and vaccinated, and will behave appropriately during the journey. 

Other airlines will no doubt follow suit and make similar announcements in the following weeks. For consumers who have a service animal or have flown with an emotional support animal in the past and have hopes of doing it again sometime soon, it would be wise to contact the airline you plan to fly with directly to find out exactly what its policies are.

In a move to reflect recent changes to the U.S. Department of Transportation's (DOT) rules regarding emotional support animals on its flights, Alaska Airli...

Article Image

American Airlines makes a safe return of the 737 MAX to the skies

American Airlines has become the first U.S. airline to return the once ill-fated 737 MAX to service. Two years after all 737 MAX were grounded following two fatal crashes and after 20 months of a rigorous recertification process by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), the aircraft made a safe return to the skies Tuesday via an American flight from Miami to New York City.

American Airlines Flight 718 left Miami on time and landed in New York ahead of schedule, then turned around and made another safe trip back to Miami Tuesday afternoon. 

Confidence restored

On top of what the FAA inspected, American said it also conducted an exhaustive process to ensure that every 737 MAX in the air is safe and that its pilots, flight attendants, team members, and customers are confident in the return of the aircraft.

Needless to say, Boeing, the aircraft’s manufacturer, was ecstatic too. The company had moved toward dire straits since the MAX’ grounding, forcing it to ask lenders for $10 billion to help offset losses from MAX-related incidents and to fend off a $336 million lawsuit over its failure to complete 737 MAX orders.

Noticeable changes

The forced downtime was actually a blessing, in part, for Boeing. It says it was able to revisit the construction and layout of its 737 planes, which led to “new, more fuel-efficient engines and improved aerodynamics” that will reduce both fuel and emissions by 20 percent. In addition, the reconfigured plane can fly some 600 miles further than its predecessor. 

On the passenger side of the equation, fliers will enjoy a new interior replete with modern sculpted sidewalls, window reveals, LED lighting designed to enhance the sense of spaciousness, and larger pivoting overhead storage bins.

Boeing’s investment in retooling the MAX has already started to pay off. Just last week, Alaska Airlines announced that the carrier is buying 23 more 737-9 airplanes, building on its original order and options to acquire 120 aircraft in total. 

Still don’t want to set foot on a 737 MAX?

For travelers who are still skeptical about flying on a 737 MAX, American, for one, says it understands. 

“If a customer doesn’t want to fly on a 737 MAX aircraft, they won’t have to … in the immediate term, we’ll provide additional flexibility to ensure our customers can be easily re-accommodated if they prefer not to fly on the 737 MAX. And if their aircraft type ever changes to a 737 MAX, there is no end to the flexibility our customers will have,” the airline said in a release. 

For customers who prefer not to fly on a 737 MAX, they can:

  • Rebook on the next available flight in the same cabin at no cost.

  • Cancel their trip completely and receive travel credits redeemable with American Airlines.

  • Change their itinerary within a 300-mile radius at no extra charge, but only if there is no alternative American Airlines flight available to get them to their destination.

American Airlines has become the first U.S. airline to return the once ill-fated 737 MAX to service. Two years after all 737 MAX were grounded following tw...

Article Image

Airlines to receive $15 billion in additional aid under new stimulus package

Under the $900 billion COVID-19 stimulus agreement reached Sunday, U.S. airlines are scheduled to receive $15 billion in additional federal aid. The deal will also require airlines to call back more than 32,000 workers who were furloughed due to the financial strain of the pandemic. 

The nation’s passenger airlines were given $25 billion in aid under the CARES Act passed in March. Once that aid ran out and it became clear that additional federal support wouldn’t be approved fast enough, airlines made the decision to start furloughing employees.

The funds set aside for airlines in the second stimulus package would help keep airline workers employed until the end of March. The bill would also see that other struggling transportation sectors receive additional funding. It includes: 

  • $1 billion for airline contractors;

  • $2 billion for airports and concessionaires;

  • $14 billion for transit;

  • $10 billion for state highways;

  • $1 billion for Amtrak; and

  • $2 billion for private bus, school bus and ferry companies.

Travelers still not flying

Although many Americans are expected to travel this week, the airline industry has said it’s still feeling the effects of the pandemic. Flight bookings have declined due to the increase in new infections during the fall and winter, and new travel restrictions haven’t helped either.

A survey found that 66 percent of people who plan to travel this week plan to do so using their own vehicle so they can avoid crowded airports.

Under the $900 billion COVID-19 stimulus agreement reached Sunday, U.S. airlines are scheduled to receive $15 billion in additional federal aid. The deal w...

Article Image

United Airlines and CDC partner up for contract tracing initiative

United Airlines and the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) have put a plan into place to launch what the airline calls “the airline industry's most comprehensive contact information collection program for public health follow-up and contact tracing.”

The initiative is very straightforward: During a United passenger’s check-in procedure, they will be given the option to voluntarily provide their contact information (email, phone number, and the address they’re traveling to) -- details that the CDC previously had difficulty obtaining in real-time. Travelers can opt in and participate via United's mobile app, at united.com, or at the airport.

"Contact tracing is a fundamental component of the nation's public health response strategy for controlling the spread of communicable diseases of public health concern," said CDC Director Dr. Robert R. Redfield. "Collection of contact information from air travelers will greatly improve the timeliness and completeness of information for COVID-19 public health follow-up and contact tracing."

United’s idea follows Delta’s contact tracing program announced on December 3 for international travelers returning to the U.S.

The phased-in approach

This initiative won’t start everywhere at once. The program will roll out in phases beginning this week with the voluntary collection of information for all international arrivals. In the weeks ahead, the airline will phase in domestic and international outbound departures. 

"Initiatives like testing and contact tracing will play a significant role in slowing the spread of COVID-19 until a vaccine is widely available," said United's Chief Customer Officer Toby Enqvist. "United continues to take a leadership role in both areas and is proud to support the CDC by doing our part to help them safeguard public health and safety."

Travel industry finally gets what it’s been begging for

Travel industry groups have been begging the Trump administration for months to produce a COVID-19 testing plan that would eliminate the patchwork of confusing state-to-state quarantines and travel bans while giving the re-opening of travel a fighting chance.

The American Society of Travel Advisors, Airlines for America, Travelers United, U.S. Travel Association, and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, along with 15 others, wrote a letter to Transportation Secretary Elaine Chao, Health and Human Services Secretary Alex Azar, and Homeland Security Secretary Chad Wolf asking for a unified national plan way back in October.  

The groups were very direct about the value of contact tracing, saying the government should “eliminate the need for blanket restrictions and traveler quarantines by implementing comprehensive, cost-effective pre-departure testing procedures and contact tracing protocols … that are medically-based, affordable, dependable, scalable, privacy-oriented, and fit into the passenger journey with as little disruption as possible.”

United Airlines and the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) have put a plan into place to launch what the airline calls “the airline indu...

Article Image

Southwest Airlines adds two more destinations to its schedule to raise its profile in California

Southwest Airlines is not one to wait for the pandemic to be done and gone. On Wednesday, it announced that it’s adding another two destinations, now making 12 new cities it’s decided to add on this year.

The newest landing spots for the discount fare carrier are Santa Barbara and Fresno. Those additions now give Southwest coverage at 13 California airports from Sacramento all the way south to San Diego.

"Our arrival in the Heart of California, both on the Central Coast and in the Central Valley, will round out nearly four decades of investment in our California Customers and communities," said Southwest Airlines Chief Commercial Officer & Executive Vice President Andrew Watterson.

"While other airlines seem to fall in and out of love with the state, we're focused on increasing the reach of our low fares and flexible policies in places where we expect them to make a difference."

Southwest’s shot was no doubt directed at American, JetBlue, and Allegiant, which all pulled out of various California destinations earlier this year. Southwest didn’t give an exact start for service to Santa Barbara and Fresno, leaving it at sometime in “the second quarter of 2021.”

Going where the pandemic isn’t

In an announcement, Kevin Meikle, Director of Aviation for Fresno Yosemite International Airport, let the cat out of the bag about Southwest’s possible reason for adding Fresno -- a gateway to nearby national parks.

"For years residents and businesses throughout Central California have expressed a desire for Southwest service and connectivity to their vast network of destinations and renowned customer service," Meikle said. 

"Southwest will expand the Central Valley's air transportation gateway to Yosemite, Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Parks, and we look forward to our new partnership with Southwest and their arrival in the spring."

Southwest’s idea isn’t necessarily novel. In July, United Airlines figured out that people are more inclined to travel to outdoorsy places like national parks than they are to a city teeming with potential COVID-19 cases. In United’s case, it focused on adding open-air spaces like Aspen, Colorado; Bozeman, Montana; and Jackson Hole, Wyoming.

Southwest Airlines is not one to wait for the pandemic to be done and gone. On Wednesday, it announced that it’s adding another two destinations, now makin...

Article Image

Delta Air Lines scraps international change fees and adds flexibility to new tickets

With the coronavirus vaccine about to shine some light at the end of the pandemic tunnel, Delta Air Lines is reframing some of its typical restrictions in hopes of attracting millions of Americans who are more than ready to get out and travel again.

Topping the list of changes is an extension to an existing waiver that promises no change fees for all tickets purchased through March 30, 2021, for travel at any time to anywhere in the world. According to a Delta spokesperson, that includes Basic Economy fares, “which typically can’t be changed or canceled.” Delta is hoping that the modification will make it easier for travelers to book their 2021 spring break or summer vacation.

The other change Delta is making is to permanently eliminate change fees for international travel originating from North America -- including flights operated by joint venture and codeshare partners (Air France, KLM, et al) -- effective immediately. 

While this sounds like great news, there is one important note that wanderlusting consumers should make -- namely, that “permanently” isn’t exactly permanent in the general sense. Delta clarified to ConsumerAffairs that Basic Economy fares for international flights are excluded from this change after March 30.

“No year has better demonstrated the value of flexibility than this one,” said Delta CEO Ed Bastian. “Our approach has always been to put people first, which is why we’re extending our current change fee waiver and making lasting changes to our practices, so customers have the trust and confidence they need long after the pandemic ends.”

Pay attention to the details on every flight

The COVID-19 pandemic has put airlines on an emotional rollercoaster as carriers look for ways to keep their planes in the air and passengers in seats. American, Southwest, JetBlue, and countless other airlines all took steps to be as consumer-sensitive as possible.

Delta’s latest move is likely to prod its competitors to do the same if not more. However, as ConsumerAffairs noted in the caveat about change fees for Delta’s Basic Economy fares, the devil is in the details. 

Anyone looking to purchase a ticket for future flights that look like great deals should always click on the “more details” or “other fees may apply” links in a reservation before clicking on the “book now” button. If there is still confusion, the next best option is to email the airline and ask for clarification. And, by all means, keep a copy of the airline’s response in case something goes wrong.

With the coronavirus vaccine about to shine some light at the end of the pandemic tunnel, Delta Air Lines is reframing some of its typical restrictions in...

Article Image

American Airlines to offer $129 preflight COVID-19 test

To boost customer bookings, American Airlines has announced that it will offer customers $129 at-home COVID-19 tests. 

The tests, which will be provided by LetsGetChecked, are intended to help travelers avoid quarantines in the places they are going. Some states -- including New York, Maryland, and Massachusetts -- require incoming travelers to quarantine for up to two weeks upon arrival. 

LetsGetChecked offers at-home nasal swab tests that promise results in under 48 hours. The program will go live starting Wednesday for flights leaving Saturday. American Airlines said the pre-flight coronavirus test it’s offering focuses on domestic travel. 

Airlines have been hit hard by the COVID-19 pandemic. Consumer demand for flights has remained far below normal levels due to travelers’ fears about contracting the virus, as well as quarantine requirements in the U.S. and abroad. 

Airlines and airports offering testing

In October, United Airlines started offering COVID-19 tests to consumers traveling to Hawaii destinations. The airline’s CEO said at the time that United is “committed to innovating to help customers continue to travel where they want to go in a way that is safe.” 

A number of airports currently have testing requirements in place to mitigate the spread of the virus. In the coming weeks, the following airports are also expected to start offering COVID-19 testing: 

  • California. San Diego International Airport (SAN)

  • Colorado. Denver International Airport (DEN) 

  • Florida. Fort Lauderdale; Hollywood International Airport (FLL) 

  • Illinois. Chicago O’Hare International Airport (ORD); Chicago Midway International Airport (MDW) 

  • Maryland. Baltimore Washington International Airport (BWI) 

  • New York. Albany International Airport (ALB)

To boost customer bookings, American Airlines has announced that it will offer customers $129 at-home COVID-19 tests. The tests, which will be provided...

Article Image

Travel restrictions for airports and states continue to change as holidays approach

Christmas 2020 -- not unlike Thanksgiving 2020 -- is going to be vastly different for anyone planning to travel this year. 

Not only will the rollout of the various coronavirus vaccines impact the confidence of those who take it and their willingness to travel, but there are also a number of airlines, airports, states, and U.S. territories now requiring a negative coronavirus test to either board an airplane or cross a border. In short, it’s a hot mess of considerations that anyone planning to travel needs to take into consideration.

Airports currently with COVID-19 testing

To simplify things, TheVacationer has put together a list of airports and states that are requiring some sort of test or confirmation.

While the list is likely to change at a moment’s notice, below is a list of United States airports that offer COVID-19 testing in some form as of December 9. To make sure you’re absolutely clear on what’s required and what’s available, it would be smart to check with the specific departure airport before scheduling a test.

Alaska -- Juneau International Airport (JNU) -- Non-resident testing $250 per test.

Alaska -- Ketchikan International Airport (KTN) -- Non-resident testing $250 per test.

Alaska -- Ted Stevens Anchorage International Airport (ANC) -- Non-resident testing $250 per test.

Arizona -- Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport (PHX) -- Prices Vary --  Terminal 4, Pre-Security.

California -- Los Angeles International Airport (LAX) -- $150 -- Tom Bradley International Terminal and Terminals 2 and 6; Available to anyone. Note: Hawaiian Airlines offers drive-through testing.

California -- Oakland International Airport (OAK) -- Free With Insurance -- North Field Complex. For the State of Hawaii’s Pre-Travel Testing Program - North Field complex or 2nd Curb Transportation Plaza.

California -- San Diego International Airport (SAN) -- Alaska Airlines Passengers Only -- $170

California -- San Francisco International Airport (SFO) -- Prices Vary -- Cathay Pacific Airways Passengers and United Airlines Flights to Hawaii. Note: Hawaiian Airlines offers drive-through testing.

Connecticut -- Bradley International Airport (BDL) -- $125 -- Baggage Claim Area; Must show boarding pass.

Florida -- Tampa International Airport (TPA) -- $150 Max -- Main Terminal; Need proof of travel within 3 days.

Hawaii -- Daniel K. Inouye International Airport (HNL) -- $125 -- For Inter-island Travel.

Massachusetts -- General Edward Lawrence Logan International Airport (BOS) -- Max $200 -- Terminal E, Pre-Security.

Minnesota -- Minneapolis--Saint Paul International Airport (MSP) -- $94 for Non-Minnesota Residents and Free for Residents -- Terminal 1.

New Jersey -- Newark Liberty International Airport (EWR) -- Prices Vary -- Terminal B.

New York --  John F. Kennedy International Airport (JFK) -- Prices Vary -- Terminals 1, 4, and 5.

New York -- LaGuardia Airport (LGA) -- Free for Passengers -- Terminal B Parking Garage.

Oregon -- Portland International Airport (PDX) -- Alaska Airlines Passengers Only -- $135.

Pennsylvania -- Philadelphia International Airport (PHL) -- Max $130 -- Terminal E.

Texas -- Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport (DFW) -- Select Flights Only via American Airlines -- Terminal D -- $249.

Texas -- Houston -- George Bush Intercontinental Airport (IAH) -- Select United Airlines Passengers -- Mail-In Testing -- $119.

Vermont -- Burlington International Airport (BTV) -- Max $175 -- Near Cell Phone Lot at Garnet Health Testing Center; Open to Public.

Washington State -- Seattle--Tacoma International Airport (SEA) -- $250 -- Central Auditorium, Pre-Security. Alaska Airlines Passengers Only Discount -- Alaska Airlines Gold Coast Center (Seatac): South parking lot -- $170. Note: Hawaiian Airlines offers drive-through testing.

Airports to offer COVID-19 testing soon

Though options aren’t available right now, the following airports have announced plans to offer COVID-19 testing either beginning at the middle or end of December 2020, or starting sometime in 2021.

California -- San Diego International Airport (SAN) -- Airport Itself -- 2021.

Colorado -- Denver -- Denver International Airport (DEN) -- December.

Florida -- Fort Lauderdale--Hollywood International Airport (FLL) -- Max $99 -- Starting December 9; Terminal 3, Pre-Security.

Illinois -- Chicago -- O’Hare International Airport (ORD) -- Max $150 -December.

Illinois -- Chicago -- Chicago Midway International Airport (MDW) -- Max $150 -- December.

Maryland -- Baltimore--Washington International Airport (BWI) -- Still Under Consideration.

New York -- Albany International Airport (ALB) -- December.

U.S. locations requiring negative COVID-19 test results

To keep a lid on the spread of the coronavirus, a handful of states and territories are requiring proof of a negative COVID-19 test. To save time and hassle, it would be smart to get tested before taking off on your trip. If you don’t, you might be subjected to a mandatory quarantine until you take a test at the destination or provide evidence of a recent negative test. Here is information on a few of them.

Alaska: Anyone traveling to Alaska is urged to take a COVID-19 test and produce negative results within 72 hours of their flight. Nonresidents who fail -- or forget -- to do so will be required to take a COVID-19 test upon arrival and quarantine until the test results are known. Nonresidents taking the test in Alaska will be subject to a $250 fee, but residents won’t be charged anything.

Hawaii: Off to the islands for a sunny holiday? If you are and are a non-resident, you must produce negative COVID-19 test results upon arrival. Before departure, travelers must upload the negative result to Safe Travels’ system or bring a physical copy of the negative test result. Any traveler who fails to produce a negative test result will be subject to a 14-day quarantine period upon arrival.

U.S. Virgin Islands: Those traveling to the United States Virgin Islands must produce a negative COVID-19 test taken within five days of embarkation. Results can be uploaded to the USVI Travel Screening Portal or be completed manually if traveling within 24 hours. Important note: Travelers should also bring a physical copy of the negative test results with them.

An extra ounce of caution regardless of travel plans

While the lists above cover air travel, there are state-specific precautions that should be taken into account when planning a holiday visit no matter how you plan to get there. 

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) offers a travel planner that’s complete with guidance on mask mandates, limits on gathering size, and self-quarantine requirements. To make absolutely sure you’ve got everything covered, it would be wise to check what your final destination requires before venturing out. 

The CDC’s location travel planner is available here, and its most current guidance on traveling domestically is available here.

The Transportation Security Administration (TSA) also has a comprehensive list of FAQs covering things like the requirement of face masks at security checkpoints, temperature checks, and even drivers licenses that may not have been able to be renewed on time because of the pandemic. Again, an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure. To learn more about the TSA’s requirements, consumers can check out the agency’s site here.

Christmas 2020 -- not unlike Thanksgiving 2020 -- is going to be vastly different for anyone planning to travel this year. Not only will the rollout of...

Article Image

Southwest Airlines warns 6,800 employees of imminent layoffs

Southwest Airlines has done its best to hold steady through the first nine months of the COVID-19 pandemic, but it’s finally thrown up its first caution flag. On Thursday, the airline warned 6,800 employees that they may be furloughed in the spring. 

According to CNN, potential furloughs would affect 2,551 ground crew members, 1,176 customer service agents, 1,500 flight attendants, and 1,221 pilots. Southwest said the employees are safe for now, but if the other shoe does indeed drop, the cuts would take place on March 15 or April 1. In October, the company’s CEO Gary Kelly essentially forecasted the furloughs when he said “we will all need to sacrifice more,” adding that company leaders are taking a 10 percent pay cut in the year ahead. 

If the threat becomes real, it will be the first time Southwest has had to resort to layoffs to stay afloat -- and no one can’t say it didn’t try to avoid that outcome. Over the last six weeks, ConsumerAffairs counted five major discounted airfare promotions that the airline offered consumers to try and recapture some of the $2.75 billion it lost during the pandemic. 

Holding out hope

An internal memo to Southwest employees stated that the airline is open to cutting a deal with union groups to avoid the nearly 7,000 furloughs. “We are not closing the door -- we'll continue negotiations if union representatives want to continue working toward reaching mutually agreeable solutions,” it read.

Two of Southwest's major unions fired right back, objecting to the company's planned furloughs and saying that union leadership will continue to fight to save jobs.

"While this development is not completely surprising, it is incredibly disappointing to our pilots and their families," said Captain Jon Weaks, president of the Southwest Airlines Pilots Association (SWAPA). He also said the union "remains committed to finding solutions that will dissuade the company from taking any further steps towards furloughs."

The Transport Workers Union (TWU), which represents Southwest flight attendants, thinks the airline is crying wolf when it’s actually flush with billions in reserves. 

"Southwest Airlines has approximately $15 billion in cash on hand and is predicted to be the first airline to emerge in making money for its shareholders," said Dan Akins, airline economist and an advisor to the TWU. The union claims that it’s offered the airline a variety of cost savings proposals and that thousands of Southwest flight attendants even offered to take extra unpaid leave in order to save their jobs.

Southwest Airlines has done its best to hold steady through the first nine months of the COVID-19 pandemic, but it’s finally thrown up its first caution fl...

Article Image

Delta introduces industry’s first contact tracing for travelers returning to the U.S.

As airlines continue their quest of giving travelers ways to feel comfortable enough to fly in the new pandemic normal, Delta Air Lines on Wednesday announced that it’s rolling out the first contract tracing program for passengers returning to the U.S.

Delta is partnering with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) in this effort, along with the airline’s nine global airline partners -- AeroMexico, Air France, Alitalia, China Eastern, KLM, Korean Air, LATAM, Virgin Atlantic, and Virgin Australia. It will also work closely with government agencies, health officials, and aviation authorities to offer safer travel at every point in a traveler’s international journey.

The program begins on December 15, and participation is open to foreign nationals and/or U.S. passport holders traveling to the United States as their final destination.

Easy and completely voluntary

Keeping things as simple as possible, Delta says that the process will only require sharing five pieces of information -- passengers’ full name, email address, stateside address, primary phone, and secondary phone. Once a passenger fills out their form, Delta will securely forward that personal information to the Customs and Border Protection office, which, in turn, will pass it along to the CDC.

When a traveler has tested positive for the coronavirus, those five pieces of information allow Delta to expedite the process of informing the CDC and passengers who were in close proximity with a confirmed case. Currently, Delta provides the CDC with a passenger manifest that identifies all customers seated two seats around the confirmed case, This information is then transmitted to the appropriate local health departments for follow-up, with each department taking responsibility for passengers in their own jurisdiction..

One important note: the program is completely voluntary, but Delta hopes all travelers will realize its value and take part. 

“Independent studies have shown that the many layers of protection Delta has already put in place are effectively minimizing the risk of COVID-19 transmission, and contact tracing adds one more important layer to our efforts to ensure safety throughout travel,” said Bill Lentsch, Delta’s Chief Customer Experience Officer. “We want customers to feel safe when they return to travel, and this voluntary program is another way we can provide additional reassurance to customers and employees alike.”  

As airlines continue their quest of giving travelers ways to feel comfortable enough to fly in the new pandemic normal, Delta Air Lines on Wednesday announ...

Article Image

Consumer groups criticize new rules governing ‘deceptive practices’ by airlines

The Department of Transportation (DOT) has established a new set of standards for determining whether an airline was being unfair or deceptive in dealing with passengers. On the surface, that sounds great for the consumer, but consumer advocacy groups disagree, saying the new standards will actually make it more difficult to curtail bad behavior and create new protections going forward.

According to the Washington Post’s coverage of the policy update, the airline industry was behind the requested change. Chief among its complaints was that the Trump administration had enacted consumer protection rules which made it more difficult for airlines to do business, so the industry reportedly asked the government to pull back on those reins a bit. 

Early in 2018, airlines asked for industry-wide rule changes as part of Trump’s deregulation push, putting more than 30 flyer-oriented protections and regulations on the chopping block. This included certain regulations created under the Obama administration, such as a DOT requirement that airlines publish the entire cost of tickets, including fees and taxes; give passengers a full 24 hours to cancel a ticket after booking; and take additional steps to protect consumers from delayed or oversold flights.

“Critical” or “Disappointing”

Airlines for America, which represents the major carriers and championed the rule changes, applauded federal officials for taking action. “This reform is a critical step forward in ensuring a data-driven regulatory process, which will produce widespread and lasting benefits for air travelers, airlines and the economy,” Katherine Estep, an Airlines for America spokeswoman, told the Post.

However, the National Consumers League isn’t buying that. “The DOT’s decision, at the height of a pandemic, to kneecap its ability to protect millions of travelers from airline industry abuses is deeply disappointing. That the Department decided to do so on the Friday after Thanksgiving highlights that they hope this terrible decision will be forgotten by Monday,” said John Breyault, the League’s vice president of public policy, telecommunications, and fraud. 

“It should be clear to every member of the flying public that current DOT leadership is focused squarely on doing the airline industry’s bidding between now and January 20.”

The incoming Biden administration could seek to reverse the rule change, but it may have things it considers more important on its to-do list, and changing a rule like this doesn’t exactly come at the snap of a finger. The Biden transition team did not respond to a request for comment from the Post, but Breyault said his organization has had positive conversations with the president-elect’s team about consumer protection issues.

The Department of Transportation (DOT) has established a new set of standards for determining whether an airline was being unfair or deceptive in dealing w...

Article Image

Delta pilots sign off on deal to avoid furloughs until 2022

Delta Air Line pilots should be happy going into the Thanksgiving weekend. On Wednesday, they voted yes on a cost-cutting deal designed to avoid more than 1,700 furloughs until 2022. 

But the pilots also had some skin in the game, agreeing to accept up to a five percent cut in hours. In addition, any pilot that would have been furloughed by the airline at the end of the month is guaranteed to receive partial pay of 30 hours a month and will not have to fly.

Other Delta employees had caught a break earlier this year, saving tens of thousands from the unemployment line. Still, other airlines such as JetBlue and United had earlier cut deals with their pilots to escape some level of furlough. When all the coronavirus-led job losses are added up, U.S. airlines have cut more than 70,000 jobs this year, all in an effort to keep carriers from completely going belly-up. 

Delta says it’s grateful

Things like furloughs and shedding jobs to make ends meet is painful for everyone involved. Delta’s chief of operations, John Laughter, expressed his gratitude in a note to pilots, saying that the company is “grateful to keep all our pilots actively employed and provide stability for you and your families.”

Laughter also warned about potential challenges that the latest spikes in coronavirus infections might create for both the airline and its workers.

“Our recovery will be uneven -- as evident by the recent increase in COVID rates which are affecting our bookings for the holiday season,” Laughter wrote. “But there is still much to be thankful for, and by working together we continue to maintain and grow a loyal customer base that feels confident choosing Delta time and again for our safety, reliability and service.”

Delta Air Line pilots should be happy going into the Thanksgiving weekend. On Wednesday, they voted yes on a cost-cutting deal designed to avoid more than...

Article Image

United Airlines says spike in COVID-19 cases is impacting air travel again

The rollercoaster ride of the COVID-19 pandemic is tough enough for the average Joe, but it’s even more of an up-and-down existence for businesses, especially airlines.

Just three days after United Airlines appeared to feel good about testing a program that guaranteed passengers that the crew tested negative before departure, the company is now moaning that the spike in positive COVID-19 cases is starting to impact air travel once again.

According to a report from CNN, United warned in a filing Thursday morning that it has witnessed a drop in bookings and, concurrently, a rise in canceled reservations. It blames these two developments on the increased infection rates across the country.

Back to the chopping block

The potential outcome of what United is witnessing could lead to even bigger cuts to its fourth quarter schedule, far beyond the planned cut of 55 percent. To try and save themselves from bleeding any more red ink, seven major U.S. airlines (including United) lobbied Congress on Thursday for a new cash infusion to help keep them afloat.

United was the first major U.S. airline to pare back its domestic schedule in early spring when the initial stateside outbreak first started affecting air travel. Delta and American quickly followed suit. 

United didn’t mention job cuts in its filing, but it’s proven that it’s not shy about taking a knife to those, either.

Other airlines feel the heat

Speaking of American, it, too, mentioned a downturn in recent bookings. However, it did not tie that dip to a rise in reservations being canceled. Vasu Raja, American Airlines chief revenue officer, told investors at a conference on Tuesday that his airline also has "definitely seen a flattening of ticket sales."

"It's been nowhere near to the kind of negative effects we saw either in July or in the March-April period," he said. "But now we're at a place where we can absolutely anticipate it and plan a network ... around that. We've seen it."

In a report sent to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) last week, Southwest said it has experienced a “deceleration in improving revenue trends for November and December 2020 in recent weeks.” 

“While the Company expected the election to impact trends, it is unclear whether the softness in booking trends is also a direct result of the recent rise in COVID-19 cases. As such, the Company remains cautious in this uncertain revenue environment,” the company said.

The rollercoaster ride of the COVID-19 pandemic is tough enough for the average Joe, but it’s even more of an up-and-down existence for businesses, especia...

Article Image

Airlines lobby Congress for new infusion of cash to help keep them afloat

Seven of the U.S.’ biggest airlines are begging Congress for another bailout, claiming the $25 billion payroll assistance they received earlier in the government’s COVID-19 rescue mission is not enough to get them through the end of the year.

The letter to congressional leaders was sent by lobbying group Airlines for America (A4A) on behalf of Delta Air Lines, United Airlines, Hawaiian Airlines, Alaska Airlines, and JetBlue Airways. 

No help could lead to more cuts

Airline executives claim that they’ve done all they can to curtail furloughs, reductions in workforce, and cuts to service, but they say there could be an even greater slashing of jobs and services unless Capitol Hill writes some new checks for the industry.

Then, there’s the situation with a coronavirus vaccine. Airline officials say they think their companies will play an important role in the distribution process.

“As the nation looks forward and takes on the logistical challenges of distributing a vaccine, it will be important to ensure there are sufficient certified employees and planes in service necessary for adequate capacity to complete the task,” the letter said.

'We respectfully ask that you come together and extend the successful PSP (payroll support programs) this year so that we can continue to support our critical aviation workforce and infrastructure. Your leadership is needed before the close of the 116th Congress so that this bipartisan and incredibly effective COVID-relief measure can continue to save American jobs and allow us to continue our significant role in the health of our US economy.”

Will push come to shove?

When the first round of checks were sent, some U.S. senators thought they were large enough to help airlines stay alive without having to resort to job cuts. However, airlines wrestled with the strings attached to receiving the aid -- namely, that they would need to keep a certain level of workers employed. 

Later, when Delta and JetBlue decided to reduce employee hours to cope with their loss of revenue, lawmakers were quick to say they would be violating the goal of the Payroll Support Program. More than a dozen U.S. senators fired off letters to airline CEOs pushing for an immediate end to the “potentially illegal” action. 

In late September, as the airline’s commitment to the payroll support program came to an end and airlines threatened to make even more cuts, congressional leaders took another swing at an additional infusion of cash, but it went nowhere, despite President Trump’s support.

“Time already ran out for U.S. airlines and many of our employees, yet there is a glimmer of hope that our leaders in Washington will act and save these jobs before it’s too late to turn back the clock,” A4A President and CEO Nicholas E. Calio said at the time.

“Some U.S. airlines may be able to reinstate employees if they receive direct payroll assistance from the federal government soon, but that becomes increasingly challenging with each passing day. Extending the Payroll Support Program is a critical step for preserving jobs, rebuilding the travel industry and restoring the economic health of our country.”

As they say, fasten your seatbelt. This turbulence is likely to continue.

Seven of the U.S.’ biggest airlines are begging Congress for another bailout, claiming the $25 billion payroll assistance they received earlier in the gove...

Article Image

FAA gives Boeing permission to restart production of its 737 MAX aircraft

There’s cause for celebration at Boeing. The U.S. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has rescinded the order that halted commercial operations of Boeing 737-8s and 737-9s -- aka the 737 MAX -- after the jets were involved in two fatal crashes. 

The FAA’s move gives all airlines under the FAA's authority to take whatever steps necessary to resume service using the aircraft and gives Boeing the all-clear to deliver those planes to buyers.

What the FAA will be watching for

In the traveler’s best interests, the FAA thoroughly examined the 737 MAX from cockpit to rudder to look for anything that could prove troublesome and cause another crash -- like the structural cracks it found on 38 of Boeing’s 737 NG jets. 

The agency’s new Airworthiness Directive spells out the requirements that must be met before U.S. carriers can resume service with their 737 MAX’, including installing software enhancements, completing wire separation modifications, pilot training, and accomplishing thorough de-preservation activities that will ensure the airplanes are ready for service.

"The FAA's directive is an important milestone," said Stan Deal, president and chief executive officer of Boeing Commercial Airplanes. "We will continue to work with regulators around the world and our customers to return the airplane back into service worldwide."

Boeing’s commitment going forward

Needless to say, Boeing does not want to go through another 20-month period where it can’t sell one of its best-selling jets and certainly can’t afford to lose more billions of dollars in sales cancellations or put its employees at risk of losing their jobs like this setback caused. 

To set itself up for success going forward, the company has realigned its org chart by merging more than 50,000 engineers into a single organization that includes a new Product & Services Safety unit, intended to unify safety responsibilities across the company.

It’s also empowered those engineers to identify, diagnose, and resolve issues with a higher level of transparency and immediacy.

Southwest commits to rigorous testing

Southwest Airlines -- one of two major domestic carriers using the 737 MAX --  likes what it’s seen from the FAA so far. Alan Kasher, Southwest’s Pilot and Senior Vice President of Air Operations, said that “with these changes we believe the MAX is now amongst the most reviewed and tested commercial aircraft in the world.”

Further up the corporate ladder, Southwest CEO Gary Kelly said that his company wants to thoroughly test out the the 737 MAX before risking the safety of a single passenger. The executive has committed to flying on the MAX before Southwest returns the aircraft to service — and he promises the same for many other Southwest Leaders.

“Before we return the aircraft to customer service, however, every active Southwest Pilot will complete additional FAA-required flight training in one of our nine 737 MAX simulators and will complete additional FAA-required computer-based training covering MAX procedures,” Kelly said.

“Southwest will also require active Pilots to re-take our original 737 MAX 8 computer-based differences training as a refresher to complement the FAA-required training. Additionally, Southwest will conduct multiple readiness flights on each of our 34 MAX aircraft and complete thousands of hours of work, inspections, and the software updates before any of our Customers board a Southwest 737 MAX.”

There’s cause for celebration at Boeing. The U.S. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has rescinded the order that halted commercial operations of Boeing...

Article Image

Latest DOT metrics show on-time performance for airlines is up, but so are grievances

The once unfriendly skies of the COVID-19 pandemic are now producing an improvement in on-time performance. However, getting a refund from an airline continues to be a major hassle for travelers, according to the latest metrics from the Department of Transportation (DOT).

In monitoring 10 airlines -- Allegiant, Delta, Southwest, American, United, Spirit, JetBlue, Alaska, Frontier, and Hawaiian -- the ups and downs shook out like this:

Arrivals

Highest on-time arrival rates:

1.    Southwest Airlines – 94.5 percent and a near 15-point improvement from the previous year

2.    Alaska Airlines Network – 92.5 percent 

3.    Hawaiian Airlines Network – 91.7 percent 

Lowest on-time arrival rates:

1.    JetBlue Airways – 85.4 percent 

2.    Allegiant Air – 85.5 percent 

3.    Frontier Airlines – 87.0 percent 

Cancellations

In July 2020, reporting marketing carriers canceled 0.8 percent of their scheduled domestic flights, a higher rate than 0.4 percent in June 2020 but a lower rate than 2.1 percent  a year before (July 2019). 

Lowest canceled flight rates

1.    Spirit Airlines – 0.1 percent 

2.    American Airlines Network – 0.6 percent 

3.    Southwest Airlines – 0.7 percent 

Highest cancellation rates:

1.    Hawaiian Airlines Network – 4.1 percent 

2.    Frontier Airlines – 3.2 percent 

3.    JetBlue Airways – 2.8 percent 

Complaints 

In July 2020, the DOT received 11,117 complaints about airline service from consumers -- up an unbelievable 493.2 percent from the total of 1,874 filed in July 2019, but down 30.3 percent from the 15,946 received in June 2020. Of the 11,117 complaints received in July 2020, 10,257 concerned refunds.

The bad boys of the complaint world turned out to be United (850 total with 93.8 percent of those regarding refunds), Frontier (795 total with 72.4 percent regarding refunds), and American (615 total with 81.9 percent regarding refunds). 

Bad news aside, every airline should get a little credit for being efficient with handling luggage. Overall, baggage-related complaints were down from 11.8 percent in July 2019 to 0.5 percent in July 2020.

Mishandling of wheelchairs

Travelers usually don’t take into consideration things like how efficient an airline is when it comes to things like mishandling assistive devices like wheelchairs. But with the pandemic already producing enough stress as it is, every little thing that goes wrong only adds to a traveler’s stress levels.

In July 2020, airlines reported mishandling a rate of 1.17 percent mishandled wheelchairs and scooters, a tick better than a year ago, but still something a traveler who needs assistance should be aware of.

While Southwest scored well in the on-time category and American in the cancelled flights segment, neither fared well in the wheelchair/scooter breakout. American (and its subsidiaries) mishandled 150 wheelchair/scooter requests, and Southwest was a distant second at 31. The airline with the best record in this category was Hawaiian, who bungled zero wheelchair/scooter requests.

Other metrics

In the animal department, it looks like all the problems related to animals have completely vanished. Whether it was the DOT’s recent involvement or the airlines just paying more attention, who knows. However, there were zero animal-related complaints in the latest DOT statistics, and for travelers with pets, that’s a welcome change.

Also down were the complaints about discrimination -- possibly a result of a House committee calling out airlines about the matter. Discrimination complaints fell from 11 in July 2019 to only five in 2020. Of those, one regarded race, three regarded national origin, and one regarded religion. The DOT says that all complaints alleging discrimination are investigated by the Department to determine if there has been a violation(s) of the passenger’s civil rights.

The once unfriendly skies of the COVID-19 pandemic are now producing an improvement in on-time performance. However, getting a refund from an airline conti...

Article Image

New Boeing study proves effectiveness of cleaning tools and methods to stave off COVID-19 on aircraft

A new joint study from aircraft manufacturer Boeing and the University of Arizona shows that cleaning tools and techniques effectively destroy the virus that causes COVID-19.

The significance of that silver lining could go a long way in giving travelers the confidence to take back to the skies and set some of their clouded fears about the health safety of an airplane aside.

As part of its Confident Travel Initiative (CTI) -- an effort to support customers and enhance the safety and well-being of passengers and crews during the COVID-19 pandemic -- the tests were performed on a real but unoccupied Boeing airplane against a live virus called MS2. The University of Arizona’s Department of Environmental Sciences then compared those results to SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19. 

With a forecasted spike in coronavirus cases and cold weather -- an environment COVID spreads easily in -- upon many of us, the transmission of SARS-CoV-2 is getting renewed interest.

Why MS2 and not the actual COVID virus?

Using MS2 instead of an actual COVID-19 virus might be a head-scratcher to the non-scientists among us, but according to the scientists involved in the study, MS2 served two purposes.

First, it is safe and harmless to humans. Secondly, it’s more difficult to kill than SARS-CoV-2. Scientific and industry studies have used the MS2 virus for years, but until now, never in an airplane cabin. 

“While these cleaning solutions had been tested in other environments, an airplane behaves differently. It was critical for us to evaluate and confirm the chemicals and techniques we recommend for our customers’ use are effective and battle-tested,” said Mike Delaney, who leads Boeing's CTI efforts. “By working with the University of Arizona, we were able to employ their world-renowned expertise in virology to do exactly that.”

Everything from overhead bins to arm rests tested

The MS2 virus was strategically placed on high-touch points throughout the aircraft’s cabin in areas that fliers are most likely to come in contact with -- seat tray tables, arm rests, seat cushions, the bathroom, overhead bins, and the galley. 

Technicians then disinfected each area with various products and technologies in two separate ways -- manual wiping and also with an electrostatic sprayer like United Airlines employs.

The tests also measured how well Boeing’s own ultraviolet wand and antimicrobial coatings worked. Antimicrobials are long-lasting coatings that destroy germs and viruses on surfaces and American Airlines was given the OK to use that method by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) earlier this year.

The final analysis

After Boeing did its part, the University of Arizona then performed a post-infection analysis on each high-touch area to determine effectiveness. The final results were a mix of various levels of effectiveness, but Boeing claims that “ultimately all the recommended products, methods and technologies successfully destroyed the MS2 virus.”

Boeing said while the first test showed impressive results, it’s not going to stop there. In a statement, the company said it will continue to work with the University of Arizona to test recommended cleaning methods against SARS-CoV-2 and other similar viruses so they could further validate their effectiveness.

A new joint study from aircraft manufacturer Boeing and the University of Arizona shows that cleaning tools and techniques effectively destroy the virus th...

Article Image

Southwest Airlines says it will start selling its empty middle seats

Now there are three major U.S. airlines that have decided to resume sales of tickets for middle seats amid the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. 

The newest addition is Southwest Airlines, joining its competitors American Airlines and United Airlines. Delta Air Lines’ blocking out of the middle seat will stay in place at least through January 6, 2021.

For nervous Thanksgiving travelers, there is a modicum of good news inside Southwest’s new policy -- the new change won’t go into effect until December 1.

Safety remains a top priority

In Southwest’s Third Quarter 2020 announcement, Gary C. Kelly, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, said that the carrier’s top priority remains the safety of its employees and customers. 

Still, Kelly is fully aware that the negative effects of the pandemic persists and the airline is doing what it can to “prudently adjust our available seat miles (ASMs, or capacity), while pursuing further revenue and cost opportunities.”

Specifically, on the company’s change of mind regarding the practice of keeping middle seats open, “bridged us from the early days of the pandemic, when we had little knowledge about the behavior of the virus, to now,” Kelly said. 

Kelly thinks things have changed because the airline now has “science-based findings from trusted medical and aviation organizations,” which is sufficient evidence that it can move toward selling all available seats. The science-based findings he pointed to come from the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center and the Stanford University School of Medicine, who both arrived at the same conclusion -- that the “risk of breathing COVID-19 particles on an airplane is virtually non-existent, with the combination of air filtration and face covering requirements.”

The final decision is up to the customer, or is it?

Nonetheless, Southwest is giving its customers a choice. He said Southwest is pairing the change with what he called “enhanced flexibility” that allows for customers on fuller flights to rebook to another flight, if they so desire. 

Southwest’s satisfaction rating during the COVID-19 pandemic has taken a bit of a hit from ConsumerAffairs reviewers, particularly in the area of vouchers and flight credit. 

“Every other vendor involved in our vacation plans was accommodating and understanding as this pandemic is affecting us all. Southwest Airlines offered NO option or deviation from their normal policy and gave us flight credits equally divided between each passenger, with an expiration date,” complained Bryan from Greenfield, Indiana. 

Rebecca of Scottsdale, Arizona, also aired her negative experience. “(Southwest Airlines) reached out and said (a voucher) would be, NO ISSUE AT ALL - and within three days they would e-mail me the new number with an extension of six months time due to covid restrictions - GREAT! Right? - No. They then sent nothing, went radio silent,” she wrote.

Now there are three major U.S. airlines that have decided to resume sales of tickets for middle seats amid the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. The newest ad...

Article Image

United Airlines tests out new COVID-19 ‘health pass’ to help regain some momentum

United Airlines is keeping its foot on the safe-to-fly accelerator with the trial of a “COVID passport.” 

The airline announced on Wednesday that it plans to try out a digital health pass as part of a pilot program that it hopes will speed up a safer opening of its international routes’ borders, as well as get more travelers feeling confident about global travel.

The move follows the airline’s recent move of giving passengers rapid COVID-19 tests. Cathay Pacific is also reported to be engaging with a set of volunteers to test this on certain flights in its route network. 

Say hello to CommonPass

United’s effort will use the backbone of the CommonPass system, “a secure and verifiable way to document” a traveler’s health status as they move from country to country. The advantage that CommonPass will bring United is that it cuts time and red tape in having to prove a passenger’s wellbeing. Not only can the system work for airlines and immigration screening, but airports and other travel industry stakeholders as well.

In United’s first trial with CommonPass on Wednesday, volunteer passengers on a flight from London’s Heathrow airport to Newark Liberty in New Jersey who had taken a coronavirus test from a certified lab at least 72 hours prior to traveling, logged those results on the CommonPass app on their smartphones.

Those passengers were also asked to use the app for other screening measures like a health declaration the country they’re flying into might require. Once a passenger has completed all the necessary data, the app creates a unique code that United staffers and border officials can scan and verify.

United’s also going the extra mile to make sure its efforts are observed and chronicled. It says that both the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the U.S. Customs and Border Protection will be waiting for passengers when the flight lands at Newark.

Not a silver bullet

Thomas Crampton, chief marketing and communications officer for the Commons Project, told MarketWatch that many of the required COVID-19 test results are shared on printed paper from unestablished labs and written in languages foreign to the people in charge of inspecting and verifying the results. 

“Today we demonstrate that you can document COVID status in a certified manner across international borders in a privacy-preserving manner,” Crampton said.

But one analyst is skeptical about posturing the CommonPass app as a silver bullet -- at least for now. Sandy Morris, equity analyst at Jefferies, said neither COVID testing nor vaccines are a perfect solution. 

“However, the combination of rapid testing, vaccines and the CommonPass digital health pass could offer a way forward,” Morris said. “The open question is how fast a digital solution like CommonPass can be deployed. Our guess is it will be rapid.”

CommonPass said that if its trials work out as they hope, it will go for full scale deployment of the framework at the beginning of 2021 with more airlines and more international routes. 

United Airlines is keeping its foot on the safe-to-fly accelerator with the trial of a “COVID passport.” The airline announced on Wednesday that it pla...

Article Image

TSA reports its first million-flier weekend since the pandemic began

There’s some hopeful news for the aviation industry in light of all the joy the pandemic has taken out of its life. Over the weekend (October 16-18), more travelers flew in the U.S. than at any other time since March 17.  

How many is more? The Transportation Security Administration (TSA) said it screened a million passengers at domestic airport checkpoints. On top of that, it also screened 6.1 million passengers at checkpoints nationwide from October 12 through October 18, which is a weekly high since mid-March.

TSA reminds fliers of new changes

To the millions of travelers who haven’t boarded a plane prior to the pandemic, flying has a whole bunch of new requirements. These include “significant TSA checkpoint modifications,” according to TSA spokesperson Lisa Farbstein. 

The modifications Farbstein refers to are mostly added safety measures like passengers screening their own boarding passes and a reduction in the number of security lanes. Some other things to be mindful of include:

Hand sanitizer. Until further notice, the TSA is allowing travelers to bring hand sanitizer up to 12oz in their carry-on bags. “Just remember to remove the larger container from your bag and place it in a separate bin for screening,” the agency says, adding that fliers should “keep in mind that all other liquids, gels and aerosols brought to a checkpoint continue to be allowed at the limit of 3.4oz or less and carried in a single quart-sized bag.”

Expired Driver’s License and REAL ID extension. Because of the pandemic, some people were unable to renew their driver's license or state-issued ID if it expired on or after March 1, 2020. In those cases, the TSA will accept expired driver’s licenses or state-issued ID a year after expiration. The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has also extended the REAL ID enforcement deadline to October 1, 2021. For specific information about the REAL ID deadline, the TSA has a dedicated website for travelers to reference.

Pre-moistened sanitized wipes. Another area the TSA is showing some flexibility in is the size restrictions on pre-moistened wipes inside carry-on bags. For the moment, “large tub, small tub, or in a baggie, pre-moistened wipes are allowed in carry-on bags without any size restrictions or packing requirements,” the TSA says. 

For a complete list of all changes that might affect a flight, check-in, security, or carry-on items, the TSA keeps an updated list that covers everything any flier needs to know. It’s available here.

There’s some hopeful news for the aviation industry in light of all the joy the pandemic has taken out of its life. Over the weekend (October 16-18), more...

Article Image

Delta suspends flights to 16 U.S. markets due to COVID-19 impact

The pandemic continues to lay waste to the commercial aviation industry. 

On Wednesday, Delta Air Lines pressed pause on flights to another 16 cities across America, putting the airline in the unlucky position of suspending more flights in more cities and for far longer than its direct competitors. Earlier this year, Delta said its planned reduction would impact 10-15 percent of its U.S. flights.

While Delta doesn’t want to leave any consumer without a way to get someplace, it has no choice but to be frugal in the COVID-19 environment. Also on Wednesday, the company announced a quarterly pre-tax loss of $2.6 billion -- a decline of 79 percent on 63 percent lower capacity when compared to the previous year -- and another $4.0 billion of items directly related to the impact of coronavirus, including early retirement programs for Delta employees.

Impacted cities

The cities that Delta has not set plans to return to are:

  • Akron-Canton, Ohio (CAK)

  • Aspen, Colorado (ASE)

  • Bangor, Maine (BGR)

  • Erie, Pennsylvania (ERI)

  • Flint, Michigan (FNT)

  • Fort Smith, Arkansas (FSM)

  • Lincoln, Nebraska (LNK)

  • Manchester, New Hampshire (MHT)

  • New Bern, North Carolina (EWN)

  • Newburgh/Stewart, New York (SWF)

  • Newport News/Williamsburg, Virginia (PHF)

  • Peoria, Illinois (PIA)

  • Santa Barbara, California (SBA)

  • Wilkes-Barre/Scranton, Pennsylvania (AVP)

  • Williston, North Dakota (XWA)

  • Worcester, Massachusetts (ORH)

How long will these flights be suspended?

According to The Points Guy, Delta could resume flights to any of these 16 cities whenever it likes, but no changes are likely for at least a month because that’s how long the airline takes to finalize its monthly schedules. For example, if Delta were to restart service to Lincoln, Nebraska on October 14, travelers could possibly see service resume to Lincoln by December.

Despite the suspensions, Delta CEO Ed Bastian feels encouraged by what he’s seeing. 

“While our September quarter results demonstrate the magnitude of the pandemic on our business, we have been encouraged as more customers travel and we are seeing a path of progressive improvement in our revenues, financial results and daily cash burn,” he said. “The actions we are taking now to take care of our people, simplify our fleet, improve the customer experience, and strengthen our brand will allow Delta to accelerate into a post-COVID recovery.”

The pandemic continues to lay waste to the commercial aviation industry. On Wednesday, Delta Air Lines pressed pause on flights to another 16 cities ac...

Article Image

Delta executives say air travel recovery could take ‘two years or more’

Delta Air Lines on Tuesday reported a net loss of almost $5.4 billion in the third quarter. The carrier warned that its recovery from the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic could extend into 2022 or even beyond. 
The pandemic had a drastic impact on its peak summer travel period, but Delta President Glen Hauenstein said demand is slowly beginning to climb. Delta and other airlines have made changes to help customers feel safe flying during the pandemic, including enhancing cleaning procedures and leaving middle seats open on flights. 
“With a slow and steady build in demand, we are restoring flying to meet our customers’ needs, while staying nimble with our capacity in light of COVID-19,” said Hauenstein.

Recovery likely to take time

Combined with its second-quarter results, Delta has reported a loss of more than $11 billion during the pandemic. The carrier ended up bringing in around 20 percent of the business it did in the third quarter of 2019. 
Hausenstein warned that it could take “two years or more” for Delta’s sales to recover. 
“While it may be two years or more until we see a normalized revenue environment, by restoring customer confidence in travel and building customer loyalty now, we are creating the foundation for sustainable future revenue growth.”
In the earnings release, Delta CEO Ed Bastian said the company has been encouraged to see steady improvement. 
“While our September quarter results demonstrate the magnitude of the pandemic on our business, we have been encouraged as more customers travel and we are seeing a path of progressive improvement in our revenues, financial results and daily cash burn,” Bastian said.
To help offset the financial impact of the health crisis, Delta has retired dozens of aircraft and offered thousands of employees buyouts and early retirement packages. 

Delta Air Lines on Tuesday reported a net loss of almost $5.4 billion in the third quarter. The carrier warned that its recovery from the impact of the COV...

Article Image

New Harvard Public Health bulletin says airline sanitation procedures are effective

Airlines have been working the sanitation angle for months to try to get travelers to believe that air travel is safe during the pandemic. While some travelers have held onto some of their doubts, a technical bulletin from the faculty at Harvard’s T.H. Chan School of Public Health might be able to change that perception.

The bulletin -- “Air Cabin Cleaning and Disinfection” -- says that the disinfecting and ventilation efforts that carriers such as Southwest, Delta, United, American, and others have made are effective “when administered properly…on surfaces.” 

Focusing on high-risk areas

Sanitization and ventilation initiatives aren’t an end-all or be-all by themselves, but Harvard officials said that coupling them with individual risk reduction like frequent hand-washing, use of sanitizers, and wearing masks works as a multi-layered strategy that, “taken together, offer(s) significant protection against respiratory infections including COVID-19.”

Nonetheless, the bulletin doesn’t discount the fact that COVID-19 can be transmitted from person-to-person via respiratory particles in a normal setting. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) says these droplets have the potential to hang in the air for hours.

In trying to separate particles that would stay on surfaces at home or in the workplace from those on a plane, the report says that aircraft lavatories are the most problematic areas because they’re high-frequency touch areas and touched by the greatest number of people.

In comments about the study, Delta Air Lines said that it is already on the case. 

“While in the air, flight attendants regularly make sure lavatories are clean, tidy, fully stocked with supplies and ready for customers,” the airline noted. It also said it’s in the early stages of installing hand sanitizer stations near the boarding portal and the lavatory.

While all airlines that ConsumerAffairs has tracked during the pandemic have some type of systematic cleaning in place, only Delta appears to be cleaning lavatories during a flight. 

Southwest, United, and American do not specifically list in-flight lavatory cleaning as a sanitary measure, but a New York Times report says that Southwest “deep cleans” its aircraft for 6-7 hours every night. The publication also notes that United deploys electrostatic spraying before “most flights.” Airlines tend to replicate nuances that their competitors do, so it’s possible that others will follow in Delta’s footsteps.

Airlines have been working the sanitation angle for months to try to get travelers to believe that air travel is safe during the pandemic. While some trave...

Article Image

Southwest to ask workers to take pay cuts to avoid furloughs next year

Southwest Airlines says it will ask its workers to take pay cuts in order to avoid losing their job due to the impact of the coronavirus pandemic.  

On Monday, Southwest CEO Gary Kelly told employees that he needs them to take a 10 percent pay cut to avoid furloughs in 2021. In an interview with CNBC, he said the action would help save the airline around $500 million a year -- “real money,” as Kelly described it. 

Like other airlines, Southwest is struggling to weather the economic impact of the global COVID-19 pandemic. Demand for flights remains significantly lower than before the pandemic. Kelly told employees that airline revenue is down 70 percent from a year ago.

“We will all need to sacrifice more,” he said, adding that company leaders are taking a 10 percent pay cut in the year ahead. Kelly himself has taken reduced pay since March and has agreed not to take a salary next year. 

"For our union contract employees, I promised you I would let you know if and when we decide to approach your union representatives for concessions," said Kelly, according to a memo seen by CNN. "Because of the inaction of the federal government, and the ongoing losses, that time has arrived."

Kelly said the airline “simply cannot afford to continue with the conditions required to maintain full pay and employment."

Federal aid needed

Airlines and labor unions are hoping that the White House will approve $25 billion in additional federal aid to support airline worker payrolls. Kelly told employees that he’s aiming to have cost-saving agreements in place with labor unions by January 1. Furloughs will be a “last resort,” he said. 

Pay could be restored to normal if Congress approves additional payroll support for carriers, he added. 

“If we’re so fortunate to have the federal government act and extend the PSP through next March as has been proposed, then all these pay-cut efforts will be discontinued or reversed,” said Kelly.

Southwest Airlines says it will ask its workers to take pay cuts in order to avoid losing their job due to the impact of the coronavirus pandemic.  On...

Article Image

FAA chief gives Boeing 737 MAX plane a positive review after flying it

After being grounded since March 2019, Boeing’s 737 MAX jets underwent a test flight by Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) chief Steve Dickson. 

Dickson, a former commercial pilot, flew the aircraft on Wednesday during a test flight in Seattle. He said the revisions to the flight control system made in the wake of the two fatal crashes gave him confidence in its airworthiness.  

"I liked what I saw," Dickson told reporters in a news conference after the flight. "I completed a number of test profiles today to examine the functionality of the aircraft and I liked what I saw, so it responded well.” 

He added that the test flight didn’t have anything to do with the FAA’s official recertification process, which is still underway. But Dickson gave the jet an overall positive review after flying it for several hours and taking it through a number of different scenarios. 

"I did two landings and also some air work maneuvers over about a two-hour period... and I felt prepared,” he said. I think most importantly, I felt that the training prepared me to be very comfortable.” 

Addressing safety issues 

Boeing’s 737 MAX has been grounded for about a year and half following two crashes that occured within five months of each other, killing a total of 346 people. 

Both crashes were caused, in part, by a faulty automated flight control system, called MCAS. Following the crashes, Boeing made changes to MCAS and expanded pilots' training to include simulator time before they can fly the plane. 

Dickson has assured the public that the plane won’t be allowed to resume service until it has undergone rigorous FAA testing. The aircraft will also need to be safe enough to earn his own personal seal of approval.

"I made a promise I would fly the 737 Max and that I wouldn't sign off on its return until I was comfortable putting my family on it," he said. "It was important to experience the training and the handling of the aircraft."

Not rushing recertification process

The FAA has released a list of changes that must be made in order for the aircraft to be recertified to fly. Dickson has said the process cannot and will not be rushed, but at this point, it appears to be close to wrapping up. 

"The FAA continues to take a thorough and deliberate approach in our review of Boeing's proposed changes to the 737 Max, he said. "The FAA will not approve the plane to return to passenger service until I'm satisfied that we've adequately addressed all of the known safety issues."

After being grounded since March 2019, Boeing’s 737 MAX jets underwent a test flight by Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) chief Steve Dickson. Dick...

Article Image

American and United furlough 32,000 workers after government funding ends

The moment the clock struck midnight on October 1, both American Airlines and United Airlines initiated the furloughing of more than 32,000 employees after talks for a hopeful COVID-19 aid package fell apart in Washington. 

The October 1 pivot point was the agreed-to end date for $25 billion in payroll grants that were established under the CARES Act. Most of the largest U.S. carriers -- American, Delta, United, Southwest, Spirit, JetBlue, Alaska -- had applied for those aid packages.

American Airlines CEO Doug Parker told his workers that the airline “will begin the difficult process of furloughing 19,000 of our hardworking and dedicated colleagues” -- an amount that’s nearly 14 percent of the airline’s pre-COVID-19 staff. 

Is all hope lost?

In the months following the government handing out those grants, airlines did just about everything they could to cut costs and salaries to try and make ends meet. But consumers were still nervous about using air travel, and cranking up the ventilation and taking out middle seats simply didn’t reverse that gut check. 

The end result was big, fat, and in red ink. Passenger loads were down by 75 percent over the summer and industry-wide revenue losses climbed to more than $400 billion.

COVID-19’s ad infinitum expiration date continues to loom large. Airline executives have said a return to normal may not happen for years and that the hit the aviation industry has taken is more serious than after 9/11.

All hope may not be lost, however. Both United and American say that if a stimulus package makes it through Congress, they are ready and willing to reverse course. Neither said how long they could keep that promise alive, though. PSA Airlines, an American-owned regional carrier, told pilots that if Washington doesn’t approve another stimulus package by Sunday, October 4, “the furloughs will still occur,” according to a company memo seen by CNBC.

The moment the clock struck midnight on October 1, both American Airlines and United Airlines initiated the furloughing of more than 32,000 employees after...

Article Image

Treasury Department closes CARES loans for seven major U.S. airlines

The U.S. Department of the Treasury announced that it has closed loans to seven major passenger airlines as part of the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act.

The seven carriers are Alaska Airlines, American Airlines, Frontier Airlines, JetBlue Airways, Hawaiian Airlines, SkyWest Airlines, and United Airlines. 

Officials say it’s likely that the initial loan amounts the airlines applied for in its pool of $25 billion will be increased because some major airlines may opt to secure financing in the private market instead of through the Treasury Department. 

“The payroll support and loan programs created by the CARES Act have saved a large number of aviation industry jobs, and kept workers employed and connected to their health care, during an unprecedented time,” said Secretary of the Treasury Steven T. Mnuchin.  

“We are pleased to conclude loans that will support this critical industry while ensuring appropriate taxpayer compensation. We call on Congress to extend the Payroll Support Program so we can continue to support aviation industry workers as our economy reopens and we continue on the path to recovery.”

The eleventh hour

A key element of the CARES loan package -- particularly for airlines -- is a commitment to maintain employee levels through the end of September. Now that the commitment is in its eleventh hour, both airlines and employees are waiting for word of a COVID-19 relief package extension.

“This is no time for governments to walk away,” Alexandre de Juniac, Director General and CEO of the International Air Transport Association (IATA). “The industry is grateful to those governments that have already provided support, but new job-saving measures are needed -- including financial measures that do not add to overstressed balance sheets.”

The U.S. Department of the Treasury announced that it has closed loans to seven major passenger airlines as part of the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Econom...

Article Image

United reaches deal with pilots’ union to avoid thousands of worker furloughs

United Airlines announced on Monday that it’s come up with a plan that will allow it to avoid having to furlough thousands of employees. 

Under an agreement with the Air Line Pilots Association, United will reduce flying schedules and maintain pay rates as it seeks to weather the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. Previously, the carrier planned to furlough 2,850 pilots after its federal aid ran out. The furloughs were set to take effect on Thursday. 

United and other airlines have said the lack of new federal support has made it necessary to enact cost-cutting measures, like furloughs. While United has reached an agreement that it will allow it to avoid some furloughs, the airline is still planning to cut nearly 13,000 jobs beginning in October. 

The airline’s pilots’ union said the deal will allow United to stay afloat until flying demand returns. However, United executives have said they don’t expect to fully recover until a vaccine for the novel coronavirus is widely available.

The furloughs that United is still planning would affect flight attendants, mechanics, and other union employees. In an effort to make it easier to bounce back once demand returns, pilots -- who have to go through a lengthier training process -- will be kept on during the health crisis. 

“Our members understood that in order to protect pilot jobs, we needed to approve this agreement,” said Todd Insler, chairman of the union’s United Airlines council.

United Airlines announced on Monday that it’s come up with a plan that will allow it to avoid having to furlough thousands of employees. Under an agree...

Article Image

Southwest Airlines updates COVID-19 policies for both passengers and employees

With an end-all and be-all of the COVID-19 pandemic still undetermined, Southwest Airlines is renewing its vow to support the well-being and comfort of both its customers and employees by continuing to limit the amount of seats sold on every flight to allow middle seats to remain open.

People flying together as family and friends still have the option of sitting together and will be allowed to occupy a middle seat if they like.

Health-conscious Thanksgiving holiday travelers will be happy to know that the airline’s commitment will last through Nov. 30. As part of its COVID-19 plan, the airline will continue to require face masks to be worn at all times. It will also enforce physical distancing measures in airports and onboard aircraft and rigorously clean its facilities and aircraft every single day.

Southwest updates what travelers can expect 

  • Face Coverings Required: All airline employees and any passenger over the age of two are required to wear a covering over their mouth and nose from the moment they board the plane until they’re out of the gate area when they land. All travelers are required to a) acknowledge an awareness of the carrier's face covering policy; and b) wear a face covering. If a passenger doesn’t have a mask, Southwest will have them available at the airport and onboard to ensure compliance with the policy.
  • Customer Health Declaration: All travelers are required to confirm they do not have symptoms of COVID-19; nor have they been diagnosed with, or exposed to, COVID-19 in the 14 days prior to travel; and that they do not have a fever at travel time.
  • Physical Distancing in Airports: If you haven’t flown Southwest lately, boarding a Southwest flight in the COVID-19 heyday, the process may be new to you. To allow for distancing, the airline boards in smaller groups of 10 and only on one side of the boarding poles in the gate areas. In addition, the airline has installed Plexiglas at ticketing and gate counters and baggage service offices to further insure protection during in-person transactions and interactions.

For a complete rundown of Southwest’s updates and policy changes, you can find them here.

With an end-all and be-all of the COVID-19 pandemic still undetermined, Southwest Airlines is renewing its vow to support the well-being and comfort of bot...

Article Image

Delta employees escape more furloughs due to buyouts and shorter schedules

Delta Air Lines has been busy this week. On Monday, the carrier found a creative way to finance operations for the near future by securing loans by exchanging frequent flier rewards. Its workers caught a break on Tuesday, saving tens of thousands from the unemployment line. 

In a memo to staff, Delta CEO Ed Bastian reported that thanks to shorter work schedules and other cost-saving measures more than 40,000 employees agreed to accept, the furlough wolf is away from the carrier’s door for the time being.

Bastian said that a 25 percent reduction in work hours for its ground-based employees also played a significant role in protecting jobs. The airline still plans to furlough close to 2,000 pilots as of October 1, but the company said it is working around the clock to cut the best deal possible with the pilots union.

Delta’s new focus

Bastian laid out the company’s new priorities in the memo. He said Delta wants to protect workers’ health, safety, and jobs; preserve the company’s liquidity and cash balance to get it through the crisis; and position the carrier for success in the future.

“The work our teams have done to ensure a safe environment on our planes, at the airport and in our workspaces is nothing short of remarkable. We have also made great strides to protect Delta jobs amid an unprecedented drop in our revenues,” Bastian wrote.

“We had an enormous response to the enhanced early retirement and departure packages that were offered this summer, with 20 percent of our people choosing voluntary exits,” Bastian said. “While it is difficult to see so many of our colleagues leave, every one of those departures helped save Delta jobs.”

Bastian said Delta’s flight attendants and ground-based frontline employees in the U.S. will likely avoid involuntary furloughs, but they’ll be performing some new tasks. Flight attendants will support the airline’s catering processes and take part in its rotating month-on, month-off Fly On/Off program. Ground workers will also take on new responsibilities such as wheelchair handling, plane refueling, and cargo handling. 

Delta Air Lines has been busy this week. On Monday, the carrier found a creative way to finance operations for the near future by securing loans by exchang...

Article Image

Delta becomes fourth major airline to secure loan with frequent flyer miles

Delta Air Lines is going to use its frequent-flier SkyMiles program to secure $6.5 billion in cash so it can make it through the COVID-19 pandemic.

While it seems like an unusual use of collateral, Delta isn’t the first airline to take this route. In recent months, United Airlines, American Airlines, and JetBlue all announced plans to do the same.

Delta has been brutally honest about its financial situation. Officials stated that the company was sitting on about $16 billion in cash but burning through somewhere in the neighborhood of $27 million a day. At that rate, its coffers would be bare in less than two years. 

Airlines and banks both win

It’s not only a good deal for the airlines, which can quickly net billions of dollars, but also for banks that can turn the miles into perks for their own credit card customers.

Frequent-flyer programs “are really the golden goose of the airlines. They’re the reason why North American airlines have historically...only had about 20 percent of global capacity but half of global airline profit,” said Morningstar equity analyst Burkett Huey in an interview with the Financial Times.

Huey went on to say that the miles-for-money swap is one of the most aggressive moves he’s seen so far.

Delta Air Lines is going to use its frequent-flier SkyMiles program to secure $6.5 billion in cash so it can make it through the COVID-19 pandemic.Whil...

Article Image

United Airlines and pilots union cut a deal to avoid furloughing 3,000 pilots

Staving off the warning that it broadcast in July, United Airlines and its 13,000-strong pilots’ union have reportedly reached an agreement to avoid furloughs of nearly 3,000 pilots.

In August, the airline said it was on track to furlough or completely lay off 2,850 pilots by October 1, when the federal aid that protected those jobs was set to expire. 

“Any potential mitigation must achieve our goals: stop planned furloughs, stop displacements, and include long-term permanent gains for any short-term, fully recoverable modifications,” Todd Insler, chairman of the United Airlines chapter of the Air Line Pilots Association (ALPA), told union members in a note on Tuesday, according to CNBC.

Neither United or the union have provided details of the agreement, including how much time they’re going to give it or how it would give the airline sufficient working capital to keep the lid on furloughs. The agreement needs to be approved by union members and leaders.

United said in a statement that it’s still committed to reducing the number of involuntary furloughs. Company officials said they were “happy we were able to reach an agreement in principle with ALPA that can potentially save pilot jobs.”  

Holding out hope

With airlines’ hopes for a quick recovery dashed for the foreseeable future, airline labor unions are still nudging lawmakers to approve an additional $25 billion in aid that could keep jobs in place through the end of March 2021.

In a recent letter to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, Senate Leaders Mitch McConnell and Chuck Schumer, Treasury Secretary Steve Mnuchin, and White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows, the ALPA reminded those leaders that they need to follow through on the promises they've made.

“We are heartened by public statements by government leaders about a COVID-19 economic relief package such as ‘We’ll be helping the airlines’ and affirming that ‘a bipartisan agreement still should be reached’ as well as committing to ‘save the lives and livelihoods of the American people.’” wrote Capt. Joseph G. DePete, President Air Line Pilots Association, and Sara Nelson International President Association of Flight Attendants. 

“We appreciate these sentiments and urge you to return to the negotiating table to translate these words into action— action that will save jobs and ensure that the United States remains the world’s aviation economic engine.”

Staving off the warning that it broadcast in July, United Airlines and its 13,000-strong pilots’ union have reportedly reached an agreement to avoid furlou...

Article Image

Boeing warns of delays in delivery of new Dreamliner aircraft

Boeing said Tuesday that a trio of production flaws discovered over the past year could delay deliveries of its 787 Dreamliner, the aircraft the company has been developing as an alternative to its embattled 737 MAX. 

The latest flaw, found in February and disclosed on Tuesday, involves the 787’s horizontal stabilizer (also known as the tail). Boeing said that during the fabrication process, some of the parts were “clamped with greater force than specified, which could result in improper gap verification and shimming,” Reuters reported. 

The issue could make it necessary for officials to inspect roughly 900 of the jets, a source familiar with the matter told Reuters.

The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) said Tuesday that it “is investigating manufacturing flaws affecting certain Boeing 787 jetliners. The agency continues to engage with Boeing.”

Boeing has been attempting to revive its business and win back public support following two deadly crashes that led to the carrier’s 737 MAX being grounded globally. The company has set out to posit its 787 Dreamliner as its primary “cash cow” in the wake of the crashes, since consumers will likely remain hesitant to board Boeing’s 737 MAX jet for some time.

The FAA said on Monday that it was also investigating two other issues in some of the carrier’s 787 Dreamliner’s, in addition to the tail flaw. FAA officials said it’s too soon to tell if these flaws will warrant new inspections. 

Boeing said Tuesday that a trio of production flaws discovered over the past year could delay deliveries of its 787 Dreamliner, the aircraft the company ha...

Article Image

United plans to cut 16,000 jobs in about a month

United Airlines said Wednesday that it plans to furlough 16,000 jobs due to low air travel demand and a lack of new federal aid. 

In a memo to employees, the airline said that its “heart-wrenching” decision to cut jobs will come ahead of the expiration of payroll restrictions tied to a federal bailout set to end October 1. Congress has been working on another coronavirus relief package, but it doesn’t currently appear to include anything for airlines. 

The airline said it "cannot continue with staffing levels that significantly exceed the schedule we fly” and that it doesn’t expect things to return to any level of normal “until a vaccine is developed and widely administered.” 

An extension of the CARES Act “would be the one thing that would prevent involuntary furloughs on October 1 and hopefully delay any potential impact on employees until early 2021," the memo said.

Struggling to stay afloat

The cuts will shave nearly 17 percent off the airline’s workforce. However, United noted that the figure is significantly less than it thought it would have to cut back in July. The lowered total was made possible by the thousands of volunteers who accepted buyouts, early retirement packages, and other forms of temporary leaves or reduced schedules. 

United and other airlines are currently trying to win back public support. In the absence of a vaccine, United CEO Scott Kirby said air travel demand this year will likely top out at just half of what it was in 2019. 

United recently announced that it would permanently scrap a $200 ticket-change fee for passengers. Shortly after the airline made its announcement, Delta, American, and Alaska Airlines announced that they would also be doing away with the $200 fee. 

United Airlines said Wednesday that it plans to furlough 16,000 jobs due to low air travel demand and a lack of new federal aid. In a memo to employees...

Article Image

American, Delta, and Alaska Airlines join United to waive most seat change fees

Alaska Airlines, American Airlines, and Delta Air Lines have joined United Airlines in the change fee waiver dance line.

Delta and American's policies are pretty much a carbon copy of United’s -- eliminating the $200 change fee on domestic tickets. But there are exceptions travelers should look for before popping the cork.

Caveats among airlines

Delta is permanently scrapping change fees for tickets purchased for travel within the domestic U.S., Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands in Delta’s First Class, Delta Premium Select, Delta Comfort+ and Main Cabin. However, Basic Economy tickets are not exempt from a change fee.

Like Delta, American’s fee waiver also includes all 50 U.S. states, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands. It also tacks on Mexico, the Caribbean, and Canada as fee waived destinations. American also waives change fees in the Main Cabin, Premium Economy, Business Class, and First Class, but it does not waive the change fees in Basic Economy.

Unlike other airlines, American’s fee waiver is not permanent. When ConsumerAffairs contacted American to see if there was an end date on the waiver program, we were told that unless the airline extends the waiver, Basic Economy fares that are purchased starting on January 1, 2021, will not be changeable.

Like Delta, Alaska Airlines’ says its change is permanent. Its new change-fee policy applies to all tickets except for Saver fares. As far as destinations are concerned, Alaska has included every place it flies both domestically and internationally.

What’s the catch?

Is this a too-good-to-be-true maneuver, or are the airlines going to start showing some long-forgotten consumer love? 

“In this case, there’s probably not (a catch),” Skift’s Brian Sumers said. “Airlines are hurting, and they need to win public support and attract new business. They’re not likely to waste the goodwill they generated this week and turn around and institute a new fee on something else next month. They will stick with passenger-friendly policies for a while.”

Sumers goes on to predict that the airlines will eventually find other revenue-making angles once they pay back the U.S. government for the bailout loans. “Still, they likely will be smarter about what they implement, perhaps adding new fees passengers understand and respect,” he said.

Alaska Airlines, American Airlines, and Delta Air Lines have joined United Airlines in the change fee waiver dance line.Delta and American's policies a...

Article Image

United Airlines announces that it will drop ticket-change fees

United Airlines announced on Sunday that it will be doing away with ticket-change fees for good. 

The monetary penalty for changing a ticket for travel within the U.S. previously cost $200. The fee is now going away permanently as the airline strives to enact more flexible policies amid the COVID-19 pandemic and the financial crisis stemming from it.

“Following previous tough times, airlines made difficult decisions to survive, sometimes at the expense of customer service,” said United CEO Scott Kirby in a news release. “United Airlines won’t be following that same playbook as we come out of this crisis. Instead, we’re taking a completely different approach – and looking at new ways to serve our customers better.”

Rival Southwest Airlines has already opted not to charge consumers ticket-change fees. United's move will likely push Delta Air Lines and American Airlines to scrap their change fees as well. 

In January, United will also be allowing travelers who want to depart earlier or later on the same day as their scheduled flight to fly standby without paying the $75 same-day change fee. 

Travelers slowly coming back to airlines

Air travel has rebounded slightly since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, but it’s still well below normal levels. Earlier this month, the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) released data showing that over 831,000 travelers were processed at security checkpoints on one Sunday in August.

While that was the highest number the agency had recorded since mid-March, the figures were still well-below normal levels. On the same Sunday last year, the TSA estimated that over 2.6 million people went through airport security.  

If other airlines follow United and Southwest’s lead in doing away with ticket-change costs, the airline industry as a whole stands to lose about $2.8 billion in ticket-change and cancellation fees, according to the Department of Transportation. 

United Airlines announced on Sunday that it will be doing away with ticket-change fees for good. The monetary penalty for changing a ticket for travel...

Article Image

Boeing grounds eight 787 Dreamliners over manufacturing flaw

Boeing has uncovered an issue in the manufacturing process of its successful widebody 787 Dreamliner. 

An early diagnosis suggests that the problem stems from two distinct manufacturing issues in the join of certain 787 aftbody fuselage sections. That, in combination, “result(s) in a condition that does not meet our design standards," the company said in a statement. 

Company officials said a thorough review is being conducted to get to the base cause of the problem. For the time being, eight of the planes will be grounded for inspection and repair. 

Production of the 787 Dreamliner slowed considerably since the pandemic began, primarily because there was little travel being done internationally. Long-haul flights have typically been where the aircraft shines due to its comfort and fuel efficiency.  

Boeing’s problems continue

The 787 Dreamliner was temporarily grounded in 2013 when its lithium batteries created fires, and a whistleblower brought up potential safety issues with the plane just last year.

But Boeing’s problems extend much further than this latest issue. The FAA recently outlined proposed changes to Boeing jets following two fatal crashes involving the company’s 737 MAX jets.

The company declined to name the three airlines that own the 787s grounded for inspections. However, aviation news site The Air Current cites a source familiar with the situation as pegging United, Air Canada, and Singapore Airlines as the owners of the eight grounded planes. Spokespeople for Singapore and United confirmed Air Current’s information.

Boeing has uncovered an issue in the manufacturing process of its successful widebody 787 Dreamliner. An early diagnosis suggests that the problem stem...

Article Image

Airlines say furloughs and layoffs are likely if more federal aid isn't received by October

If Congress can’t come through with an extension of the Paycheck Protection Program soon, tens of thousands of airline employees could see themselves without a job come October 1.

The first flare went up on Tuesday at the headquarters of American Airlines when the company announced that it will cut 19,000 employees from its payroll when the federal aid that protected those jobs expires. 

The 19,000 American employees include 17,500 flight attendants, pilots, and mechanics, plus 1,500 administration and management jobs. All told -- when combined with pink slips American handed out earlier and the 39,000 employees who opted for voluntary leave or early retirement -- American’s total workforce is about 41 percent smaller than the total workforce it had at the onset of the pandemic

“We have come to you many times throughout the pandemic, often with sobering updates on a world none of us could have imagined,” wrote American Airlines CEO Doug Parker along with the company’s president, Robert Isom, in a note to its staff announcing the cuts. 

Expect other airlines to follow suit

American isn’t the only airline trying to keep itself afloat. On Monday, Delta Air Lines also announced that it will have to furlough 2,000 pilots if it can’t get some relief from its labor union.

In June, United Airlines did its best to get ahead of the situation by coming to terms with the pilots union over early retirements and voluntary furloughs.

Southwest -- which has enough money in the bank to survive the pandemic for at least two years -- said it doesn’t foresee cutting jobs in 2020 because a fourth of its workers have signed up for either a buyout package or voluntary leave. 

Holding out for hope

While the $25 billion in payroll support the CARES Act provided U.S. airlines evaporates on October 1, there’s some hope that there could be an extension of that support.

A couple of weeks ago, 16 Republican senators wrote a letter urging Congress to consider a “clean extension” of the payroll support for airline employees who were included in the CARES package. There are reports that the rallying cry has also received support from some Democrats as well.

If Congress can’t come through with an extension of the Paycheck Protection Program soon, tens of thousands of airline employees could see themselves witho...

Article Image

EPA gives American Airlines approval for new long-lasting surface disinfectant

The age-old axiom of “no good deed goes unpunished'' has come true for American Airlines. The company was able to get an emergency authorization from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to implement a new antimicrobial product designed to protect against COVID-19 on aircraft surfaces. 

The good news is that the product -- SurfaceWise2 -- has been proven to last up to seven days and is the longest-lasting surface protectant that has earned the EPA’s blessing. The bad news is that while it protects against transmission on surfaces like tray tables, the coronavirus is widely believed to spread predominantly through close contact between people.

The emergency authorization is currently limited to the state of Texas, with the state permitting American Airlines airport facilities and planes to use the disinfectant at specific locations. 

Personal hygiene still rules the day

While the EPA stated that SurfaceWise2 may help “address the current national emergency” and “increase consumer confidence,” it also noted that the disinfectant is not a substitute for proper cleaning practices.

“This product is not a replacement for routine cleaning and disinfection with products from EPA’s List N: Disinfectants for Use Against SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19. EPA recommends that facilities continue to follow the cleaning and disinfection recommendations from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC),” the agency wrote.

The agency went on to remind people that a sanitizer by itself is not the be-all and end-all for COVID-19.

“Please note that according to the CDC, while ‘it may be possible that a person can get COVID-19 by touching a surface or object that has the virus on it and then touching their own mouth, nose, or possibly their eyes,’ the virus is thought to spread mainly through close contact between individuals.”

Officials say that the approved emergency use is only good for a year. As new data emerges, it’s possible that the agency may alter the approval of the product’s emergency use.

The age-old axiom of “no good deed goes unpunished'' has come true for American Airlines. The company was able to get an emergency authorization from the E...

Article Image

Delta will sell more seats on its flight, but it’s still being cautious about distancing

Delta Air Lines has carefully been plotting a full return to the skies. Earlier this week, it announced that it was testing every single one of its employees for COVID-19 to ensure that its flights were safe. 

On Thursday, it announced that it plans to start selling additional seats on its flights. While more passengers will be coming onboard, the company says it is keeping its promise about blocking the middle-seat to lessen the possibility of any spread of coronavirus between passengers.

The cap on the number of seats sold and blocking out the middle seat will stay in place at least through January 6, 2021.

Safety remains the priority

In a news release, the airline positioned itself against its competitors, saying it is “your choice for safer space.” 

“Medical experts, including our own partners at Emory Healthcare, agree – more distance on board makes a difference,” said Bill Lentsch, Chief Customer Experience Officer. 

“We believe that taking care of our customers and employees and restoring confidence in the safety of air travel is more important right now than filling up every seat on a plane. We’ll continue taking a thoughtful, layered approach ensuring customers know to expect the highest standard of care as they prepare for their holiday travels.”

Delta’s proactive and flexible plans

Delta is making a bid to be the most cautious of the major airlines when it comes to pandemic-related prevention efforts. Its latest announcement continues that cautionary tone, and the company said that it realizes that flexibility is more important than ever. 

Plotting out its next steps for health-conscious fliers and people or families who might be flying together come holiday time, Delta’s policy on middle seats will work like this:

  • For customers in parties of 1-2: Middle seats will be blocked for safety.

  • For customers in parties of 3 or more: Middle seats will appear as available for booking, to allow families and travel companions to select seats together.

As far as capacity is concerned, Delta says that passengers can expect Delta to do the following through October 31:

  • Limit the number of customers on board all aircraft – with or without middle seats.

  • Limit the First Class cabin to half capacity to further ensure more space between customers. However, on regional jets in 1x2 configurations, the First Class cabin will be capped at 67 percent.

  • Block one aisle of seats on aircraft without middle seats.

On routes where its planes begin to fill, Delta says it will continue to look for opportunities to upsize to a larger aircraft type or, if necessary, add more flights.

The only area that will be offered at full capacity (effective October 1) is the Delta One cabin, which is available on long-haul international flights and in select long-haul domestic markets. Its argument for doing that is that the seats in Delta One are already well-distanced because of the configuration of the cabin and the design of the seats (such as being able to turn into a bed). 

Delta Air Lines has carefully been plotting a full return to the skies. Earlier this week, it announced that it was testing every single one of its employe...

Article Image

Airbnb to put global party ban in place due to COVID-19 health concerns

Travel is starting to pick back up, and some consumers might be looking to break up their long stay at home during the pandemic with a trip or vacation. But if they’re looking to book a stay at an Airbnb location, they better not be thinking of throwing any wild parties. 

Airbnb announced on Thursday that it is implementing a global party ban on all parties and events at Airbnb listings due to health concerns linked to COVID-19. In a blog post, officials said the ban applies to all future bookings on the platform and will remain in effect until further notice.

“Instituting a global ban on parties and events is in the best interest of public health,” the company stated.

Shutting down gatherings

A ban on parties isn’t exactly something new for Airbnb. The company says that unauthorized parties were never allowed at its listed properties. A substantial majority of consumers who list their properties on the platform already ban parties under their “House Rules.”

Airbnb says its decision is a response to shifting public health mandates across the U.S. Officials say users in some areas that have shut down establishments like bars, clubs, and pubs have acted against their better judgment by holding gatherings at listed locations.

“Some have chosen to take bar and club behavior to homes, sometimes rented through our platform. We think such conduct is incredibly irresponsible -- we do not want that type of business, and anyone engaged in or allowing that behavior does not belong on our platform,” the company said.

As part of the ban, Airbnb is prohibiting parties on all future bookings and capping the number of people at each listing to a maximum of 16. The company says it will be informing all guests about the new rules and may pursue legal action against those who violate its policy. 

The ban itself has not yet taken effect, but the company says it will be rolled out “in the near future.” The company also notes that it’s limit of 16 people per listing does not override any local health restrictions.

Travel is starting to pick back up, and some consumers might be looking to break up their long stay at home during the pandemic with a trip or vacation. Bu...

Article Image

JetBlue and Goldman Sachs roll out a buy now, pay later credit plan

Despite all the ups and downs the airline industry has faced recently, JetBlue has decided to offer consumers a little perk. The airline and Goldman Sachs are joining forces to allow travelers to use MarcusPay -- Goldman Sachs’ instant credit, buy-now-pay-later (BNPL) plan -- to pay for retail purchases over time at the point-of-sale.

The new arrangement expands on an earlier deal to provide MarcusPay as a BNPL option for JetBlue Vacations packages of hotels and airfare. JetBlue customers can apply for a MarcusPay loan from the payment page on jetblue.com or at jetbluevacations.com. It will also be available in the coming weeks on the JetBlue mobile app.

How it works

MarcusPay can be used for trips that cost between $750 and $10,000. There are several available loan options for customers, and there’s no upfront deposit required. There are also no fees that come with the loan, and the interest rate will be fixed. Neither JetBlue or Goldman Sachs published a rate specific to this program, but MarcusPay’s current APRs run from from 10.99 percent to 25.99 percent with a payoff option of 12 or 18 months. 

While the interest rates aren’t exactly prize winners, JetBlue and Goldman Sachs think that removing some of the hassle and added cost of planning a vacation will play well in the uncertain financial environment brought on by the pandemic.

“MarcusPay gives customers a smart alternative to financing large purchases,” said Elisabeth Kozack, head of Consumer Lending Partnerships at Marcus by Goldman Sachs. “JetBlue is a terrific partner for MarcusPay. They remain focused on delivering against their customers’ needs and providing transparency, which helps them deliver a differentiated customer experience for travelers.”

BNPL plays well in the coronavirus crisis

Not that the pandemic needs thanking, but the fact of the matter is that U.S. consumer spending has been in a tailspin since COVID-19 came to town. However, PYMTS Buy Now Pay Later Tracker indicates that BNPL options could be a way to get consumers spending money again. 

“The concept (of BNPL) is to not only make transactions affordable, but seamless,” explained PYMTS.

“These arrangements can also allow customers to purchase more or costlier items than they could otherwise, thereby helping merchants. Shoppers can feel more at ease, too, replacing a broken refrigerator or washing machine that conked out right after a consumer lost a job.” 

Despite all the ups and downs the airline industry has faced recently, JetBlue has decided to offer consumers a little perk. The airline and Goldman Sachs...

Article Image

U.S. and China to increase flights between nations

Travel restrictions between China and the U.S. are being eased, according to an announcement by the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT). 

On Tuesday, the agency announced that four Chinese airlines will be able to increase air traffic to the U.S. to a total of eight weekly round-trip flights. The decision matches allowances given to United Airlines and Delta Air Lines after each of the carriers qualified for additional U.S. flights going to China earlier this month. 

In its announcement, the DOT implied that it would continue to move in step with Chinese officials so that air carriers from each country have an equal number of flights going between the two nations.

“The Order...indicates our willingness to further revisit our action should the Chinese aviation authorities adjust their policies to bring about the necessary improved situation for U.S. carriers in which both they and the Chinese carriers could fully exercise their bilateral rights,” the agency stated.

Delta increases prevention efforts

International flights have begun to slowly come back over the last couple of months as the world recovers from the coronavirus pandemic. Currently, travelers are still required to follow certain safety precautions depending on the airline they choose to use.

Delta Air Lines -- one of the carriers that has flights going to China -- recently intensified its requirements for both passengers and employees to mitigate COVID-19 infections. Fortunately, the company says its efforts have paid off.

“The infection rate among our customer-facing employees is below the national average and shows that our Delta CareStandard measures are working,” said Joanne Smith, Delta’s executive vice president and chief people officer. 

“While we're encouraged by our results, we know we can’t afford to let up now. Health experts agree that a multi-layered approach – one that includes testing, symptom-checking, mask-wearing, environmental cleaning and physical distancing – is the greatest inhibitor to spreading COVID-19 and will play a critical role in keeping our people safe in the weeks and months ahead.”

Travel restrictions between China and the U.S. are being eased, according to an announcement by the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT). On Tuesday...

Article Image

Delta Air Lines takes on an employee-wide coronavirus testing program

While other airlines are canceling routes and pulling back on sanitization efforts, Delta Air Lines continues to trudge forward with anti-coronavirus moves to keep both employees and customers healthy and safe onboard. 

Adding to its enforcement of facial coverings for all passengers, requiring travelers to certify that their health is in tip-top shape, and mandating that if a passenger can’t wear mask that they take a COVID-19 test, the airline is now testing nearly 100 percent of the airline’s workforce for the coronavirus by the end of the August. About half of Delta’s active employees have been tested so far.

“Our customers want to know that the people caring for them while traveling are healthy,” said Joanne Smith, Executive Vice President and Chief People Officer. “Providing COVID-19 testing for all of our people is an important action we can take to keep employees, their families and our customers safe, increasing confidence in travel while doing our part to slow and stop the spread of the virus.”

If a Delta employee tests positive

Delta argues that testing its entire 75,000-strong employee roster will reduce exposure to others and ensure that asymptomatic individuals have time to recover at home. To pull this off, Delta has brought in the Mayo Clinic to help develop a strategy based on tailored risk assessments. 

To help create a healthier workplace long-term and curb the rate of infection, the Mayo Clinic will also review and evaluate Delta’s health and safety practices on everything from infection prevention measures to workforce risk assessments. If one of Delta’s employees tests positive for COVID-19, they will be required to isolate at home for a minimum of 10 days while receiving full pay. 

For employees who have been exposed to others with COVID-19 but have not tested positive, they are required to remain out of the workplace for 14 days from the date of exposure. They will also receive full pay protection. 

Delta is also offering employees the option of being tested for COVID-19 antibodies at all of its major U.S. hubs and at more than 2,000 Quest Diagnostic locations nationwide – free of charge.

Delta’s efforts are paying off

While the rest of the world has been waiting for a vaccine or the launch of the newly approved quick-to-administer saliva test, Delta has been working hard to make sure anything a customer touches that’s related to the airline is as safe as possible. That effort seems to be paying off.

“The infection rate among our customer-facing employees is below the national average and shows that our Delta CareStandard measures are working,” Smith said. “While we're encouraged by our results, we know we can’t afford to let up now. Health experts agree that a multi-layered approach – one that includes testing, symptom-checking, mask-wearing, environmental cleaning and physical distancing – are the greatest inhibitors to spreading COVID-19 and will play a critical role in keeping our people safe in the weeks and months ahead.”

While other airlines are canceling routes and pulling back on sanitization efforts, Delta Air Lines continues to trudge forward with anti-coronavirus moves...

Article Image

American Airlines looks to cut flights to 30 U.S. markets

American Airlines is said to be considering a reduction in flights to as many as 30 smaller U.S. cities if a federal requirement to continue those flights expires at the end of September. 

Citing an airline official familiar with the matter, the New York Post reports that American only agreed to keep serving those smaller cities because it was an essential condition in receiving $5.8 billion in coronavirus aid. However, American is keeping mum on if this is a chess move designed to put added pressure on Congress and the White House to give airlines another $25 billion for labor costs and salaries. 

Speaking on the condition of anonymity, the American Airlines official did not specify exactly which cities might lose service. However, according to the Post, the changes could appear in schedules as early as next week.

Airlines banked on a rebound that never fully happened

After taking a 95 percent tumble in April, air travel in the U.S. has rebounded a bit but is still a far cry from 2019. As an example, there were 590,749 travelers who went through a TSA checkpoint on Wednesday compared to 2,391,906 who were screened on the same day a year ago, according to TSA data.

As global business confidence started to rebound in May, the airlines’ outlook started to look hopeful. “Given the historical relationship between business sentiment and air passenger volumes, this rebound would normally bode well for the air travel outlook,” wrote economists at the International Air Transport Association (IATA). 

“However, these are far from normal times; limited corporate travel budgets, the increased use of online conferencing, continued international travel restrictions and ongoing health (and duty of care) concerns all contribute to a weakened relationship between business confidence and air travel at present.”

Airlines follow consumer sentiment

The IATA went on to say that it really comes down to consumer sentiment. If that factor remains subdued, airlines will have to concern themselves about rising unemployment and the continuity of government support programs in the months ahead.

Airlines aren’t sitting around waiting for the $419 billion in total revenue they’ve lost to magically appear. Both airlines and their affiliated labor unions are lobbying for another chunk of relief funds to get them through April 2021. They reportedly have half of the House of Representatives on their side, including more than 20 Republicans, and at least a dozen Republicans in the Senate. President Trump also recognizes the airlines’ pain. 

“Obviously the airline business is not doing very well,” he said when asked about the issue at a news briefing last week. “I would be certainly in favor. We can’t lose our transportation system.”

American Airlines is said to be considering a reduction in flights to as many as 30 smaller U.S. cities if a federal requirement to continue those flights...

Article Image

U.S. airport traffic hits new high during pandemic

The nation’s airports saw a surge in foot traffic over the weekend. 

Data published by the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) shows that over 831,000 travelers were processed at security checkpoints on Sunday. That’s the highest number that the agency has tracked since March 17, at the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic. 

While the bump in traffic is surely good news for airline companies, it’s important to note that these figures are still well below normal levels. On the same Sunday in 2019, the TSA estimates that over 2.6 million travelers went through security. 

Traffic numbers continue rising

Airport traffic numbers certainly aren’t anywhere close to approaching pre-pandemic levels, but that doesn’t mean there isn’t cause for some optimism. After all, these numbers have been steadily climbing for several months. 

In a report released today, the Bureau of Transportation Statistics (BTS) says that the number of U.S. airline passengers rose by 93 percent month-over-month in June. That means the number of passengers nearly doubled. 

“The large airlines carried 16.3 million passengers in June 2020 (preliminary), up from 8.4 million passengers on all U.S. airlines in May 2020 and up from 3 million in April 2020, which was the lowest monthly total in BTS records dating back to 1974,” the agency said. 

If the TSA security checkpoint numbers are any indication, those numbers will only improve for the month of July. While there were no days in June in which checkpoint visits exceeded 700,000, the agency’s report shows there were 16 of those days in the month that followed. So far in August, 7 out of 9 days for which the agency has data have surpassed the 700,000 mark. 

The nation’s airports saw a surge in foot traffic over the weekend. Data published by the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) shows that over...

Article Image

Virgin Atlantic becomes the first major airline to file for bankruptcy due to COVID-19

COVID-19 has brought the first airline to its knees. Virgin Atlantic has filed for bankruptcy in the United States as it does everything in its power to put the finishing touches on a $1.5 billion plan that it hopes will rescue it from the coronavirus calamity.

The UK-based company filed for Chapter 15 bankruptcy protection on Tuesday. Chapter 15 allows cooperation between the U.S. and foreign courts, sheltering the U.S. assets of foreign companies that are undergoing restructuring proceedings in their home country. The airline also filed a similar claim in the UK and has penciled in August 15 for a meeting with creditors to vote on the restructuring plan.

Not exactly a surprise

In publicly discussing its post-COVID future in early May, Virgin was blunt about its situation, saying, “Our path forward must change. To emerge from this crisis, against an uncertain backdrop, the airline must radically adapt, so that it can continue to thrive, while always keeping its people and customers at the heart of everything it does.”

At the time, the airline said it would make shifts in aircraft, airports, the number of employees, and destinations so that once the crisis subsided it could regain its footing.

“We have weathered many storms since our first flight 36 years ago, but none has been as devastating as COVID-19 and the associated loss of life and livelihood for so many,” Shai Weiss, CEO, Virgin Atlantic commented. 

“However, to safeguard our future and emerge a sustainably profitable business, now is the time for further action to reduce our costs, preserve cash and to protect as many jobs as possible. It is crucial that we return to profitability in 2021.”

A full recovery won’t come any time soon

The numbers -- not just for Virgin Atlantic but for every airline -- are hard to fathom. The International Air Transport Association’s (IATA) latest number crunching says its members are $419 billion in the hole, with 7.5 million flights cancelled, and consumer demand is down 54 percent.

IATA estimates that things might not return to normal until 2023, possibly as late as 2024. An IATA survey showed that 66 percent of travelers are likely to travel less in the post-pandemic world and 64 percent said they’re completely postponing travel until both travel and economic factors improve for -- not only for themselves, but for the economy at large.

COVID-19 has brought the first airline to its knees. Virgin Atlantic has filed for bankruptcy in the United States as it does everything in its power to pu...

Article Image

Southwest Airlines stops sanitizing armrests and seat belts between flights

The whole airline industry’s response to the coronavirus pandemic continues to get more interesting. On Tuesday, Delta Air Lines announced tighter requirements for face coverings and now, Southwest Airlines seems to be leaning the other way. 

In a memo obtained by USA Today, Southwest said it will no longer be disinfecting armrests and seat belts between flights, opting to disinfect only high-touch areas like lavatories and tray tables.

The reasons

When ConsumerAffairs contacted Southwest for the reasons behind this move, its chief rationale was that optimizing staffing and cleaning processes is necessary because the available time between flights is getting tighter as its schedule reverts back to normal. 

“This approach is one more process evolution during the pandemic designed to support our multi-layered cleaning program that occurs throughout the day,” the airline said.

Southwest went on to say that bathrooms and tray tables are the primary focus because the airline is set “on cleaning as many high-touch areas as possible during the allotted turns … while shifting other areas to be disinfected during our overnight cleaning process, when Southwest Teams spend six to seven hours per aircraft cleaning all interior surfaces.”

However, in a bit of DIY sanitization for germ-conscious fliers, Southwest said that if customers want to wipe down armrests and seat belts, all they have to do is ask and they will be given sanitizing wipes to disinfect their space.

All other health safety precautions stay the same

Southwest will continue the majority of its COVID-related procedures for the near future, like employing face coverings, a reduction in the number of available seats, physical distancing, and boarding passengers in smaller groups. In particular, Southwest wants travelers to know that it’s still doing enhanced overnight cleaning, “when Southwest Teams spend six to seven hours per aircraft cleaning all interior surfaces.” Those precautions are reported to stay in place until October.

According to Travel + Leisure, the airline is also going high-tech to check the health readiness of passengers. It announced that it’s doing a beta test of thermal cameras at select airports to check passengers' temperatures.

“As always, Southwest will monitor Customer and Employee feedback as we adapt to the new normal in air travel, while ensuring we keep safety as our top priority,” is how Southwest wrapped up its response to ConsumerAffairs. 

The whole airline industry’s response to the coronavirus pandemic continues to get more interesting. On Tuesday, Delta Air Lines announced tighter requirem...

Article Image

Delta beefs up its face covering policy

In the most rigorous coronavirus-related move ConsumerAffairs has seen an airline make, Delta Air Lines is taking its face coverings mandate up a notch -- a very stringent notch at that. 

While the airline had mandated masks as a requisite to board its flights and wear one while in-flight, passengers are now required to wear a face covering during check-in, while walking through jet bridges, in the boarding gate area, and for any traveler who visits Delta’s Sky Clubs lounges.

However, there’s one wrinkle in Delta’s updated face covering policy that most travelers aren’t aware of -- the fact that not every mask meets the airline’s requirement.

“Any mask with an exhaust valve is not approved as an acceptable face mask for customers traveling on any Delta operated flight,” the airline stated.

And it’s not just Delta who thinks this way. Health care experts do, too. “A face mask with an exhalation valve doesn’t help protect others,” cautions Kentucky-based Norton Healthcare. “The valve makes it easier for you to exhale, but it also lets your germs out into the air. When it comes to protecting others, a mask with an exhalation valve is like not wearing one at all.”

Delta lays down the law

Delta is trying to be as flexible as possible and says that travelers with “unique mask requirements” are encouraged to bring the appropriate face covering that best meets their needs. 

Conversely, customers with underlying conditions that unequivocally prevent the wearing of a face covering or mask are “strongly encouraged” to rethink their travel plans or should arrive at least an hour earlier than usual and complete a ‘Clearance-to-Fly’ process prior to departure. 

Delta is telling travelers that its rules take precedence over other exemptions detailed by various city or state governments. It also adds that it will be cracking down on passengers who try to get around the rule by falsely claiming a disability or health condition that prevents the wearing of a mask.

“Mask exemptions ... do not exempt customers from any requirements that may be imposed by governments, including local, state or foreign countries, (at the origin or destination) or from requirements on other airlines,” Delta warned. “Any false claims of a disability or health condition to obtain an exemption from wearing a mask or face covering may result in the suspension of travel privileges on any Delta flight for the duration of the mask/face covering requirement.”

In the most rigorous coronavirus-related move ConsumerAffairs has seen an airline make, Delta Air Lines is taking its face coverings mandate up a notch --...

Article Image

FAA outlines proposed changes to Boeing jets

The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has released a report outlining the steps Boeing will need to take in order for the planes to be deemed airworthy. 

On Monday, the FAA released a “preliminary summary” of what it believes are the appropriate next steps to address lingering safety issues. The agency noted that the document is “subject to revision and updating as the FAA completes additional steps in the process of reviewing the Boeing 737 MAX for return to service.” 

Based on its 18-month review of the plane and the issues that contributed to two fatal crashes in 2019, the FAA is asking for revamped software for the aircraft’s flight control computer and displays. 

The agency is also asking for a revised manual for flight crew, new wiring for the plane's horizontal stabilizers, complete tests of each plane's angle-of-attack sensor system, and operational test flights to ensure the plane’s safety. 

Still months away from returning to the air

The FAA’s proposed changes were detailed in a 96-page summary, which the public will have 45 days to comment on before Boeing is officially directed to make the changes. The plane’s return to the skies likely wouldn’t come for a few months after the comment period. 

The FAA said its report was based on the input of “40 engineers, inspectors, pilots, and technical support staff,” more than 60,000 hours of “review, certification testing, and evaluation of pertinent documents,” and 50 hours of its own testing. More than 4,000 hours of Boeing’s flight and simulator tests were analyzed and three days of flight tests were recently completed in the Seattle, Washington area, according to the FAA. 

The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has released a report outlining the steps Boeing will need to take in order for the planes to be deemed airworthy...

Article Image

Delta Air Lines now requires every passenger to certify that they have no COVID-19 symptoms

Delta Air Lines is the latest domestic airline to add a COVID-19 assessment step to its check-in process.

The move follows American Airlines’ and United Airlines’ requirement that passengers certify they are symptom-free before traveling, Delta says its new health acknowledgement prompts during check-in act as another layer of protection for both its employees and customers during the pandemic. 

Certify or don’t fly at all

Delta is mandating that passengers acknowledge the following: 

  1. They have not had a COVID-19 diagnosis or been exposed to COVID-19 in the past 14 days;

  2. They have not experienced any one of the primary symptoms of COVID-19 in the past 14 days; and

  3. They will wear a face covering throughout the airport, in Delta Sky Clubs, and onboard the aircraft unless they meet the criteria for exemption. If a traveler forgot to pack a mask or face covering, Delta has created “Care Kits” that include both a disposable face mask and hand sanitizer just in case. 

And if they can’t acknowledge any of those points? Simple: They will be asked to cancel or change their reservation (with the usual fees waived). 

“The layers of protection we’ve implemented across travel with Delta are designed to keep customers and employees safe,” said Bill Lentsch, Chief Customer Experience Officer. “Now we’re asking customers to embrace their responsibility to fellow travelers and Delta people by only traveling with us only if they acknowledge important health standards.” 

Delta Air Lines is the latest domestic airline to add a COVID-19 assessment step to its check-in process.The move follows American Airlines’ and United...

Article Image

United Airlines says it might have to furlough more pilots

No more than two weeks after United Airlines reportedly had come to terms with a pilots union over early retirements and voluntary furloughs, it said that it may have spoken too soon. The company now says there may be more furloughs on the way given the bleak future of travelers returning to the not-so-friendly skies.

Earlier this month, United told a third of its staff -- about 36,000 employees -- that their job security was iffy at best. Earlier this week, the airline prodded its employees a little further toward considering either voluntary leave or a buyout, extending the deadline for those options into August. Originally, United had plans to furlough about a third of its pilots before 2021. However, that forecast has also changed. 

“We may need to furlough more pilots in 2020, and in 2021, than originally planned,” Bryan Quigley, United’s senior vice president of flight operations, said in a note to employees.

Will Congress step in again?

Congress has been working on another coronavirus relief package, but there doesn’t seem to be anything in that deal for the airlines. CNBC reports that more than 200 lawmakers and airline labor unions are pushing Congress to grant an extra $32 billion in payroll support so that the airline industry can protect jobs at least through the end of March 2021.

“It is clear that Congress must act to extend the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act which has helped to prevent widespread layoffs of aviation workers to date,” insisted Capt. Joe DePete, president of the Air Line Pilots Association, Int’l (ALPA).

Airlines haven’t formally asked Congress for additional aid. CNBC reports that executives at both American and United are “walking a fine line on the issue,” but both airlines back the unions’ efforts. In United’s case, Quigley said additional aid or cost-cutting agreements with unions could mitigate furloughs.

No more than two weeks after United Airlines reportedly had come to terms with a pilots union over early retirements and voluntary furloughs, it said that...

Article Image

FAA orders emergency inspections of Boeing 737 planes over engine failure concerns

Boeing has gone through the wringer over safety issues related to its 737 MAX aircraft, but now some of its other 737 models have raised eyebrows at the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA).

On Friday, FAA officials released an Airworthiness Directive for approximately 2,000 Boeing 737 aircraft that have been put in storage during the coronavirus pandemic. The reason? Officials say that the planes may have experienced corrosion while sitting idle and that they may be prone to engine failure. 

The directive covers certain older Boeing aircraft that have not been operated within the last seven days or more. Airlines that have these older 737 planes in their fleet are being asked to check for corrosion on engine valves.

Boeing admitted that the planes indicated by the FAA “can be more susceptible to corrosion” because they have been used infrequently during the COVID-19 pandemic.

The FAA’s directive may have been prompted by an Alaska Airlines report about an engine shutdown that occurred on one of its Boeing aircraft earlier this month. CNBC reports that the airline told the FAA that it experienced the issue on one of its flights from Seattle to Austin on July 15. The engine shutdown led to a safe emergency landing.

Boeing has gone through the wringer over safety issues related to its 737 MAX aircraft, but now some of its other 737 models have raised eyebrows at the Fe...

Article Image

United Airlines vows to crank up air flow to mitigate COVID-19

Another day, another move by an airline trying to regain consumer trust in the middle of the pandemic.

Out of Chicago comes news from United Airlines that it is maximizing the air flow volume during boarding and deplaning in its mainline aircraft to try and mitigate the spread of COVID-19. The airline says the process is scheduled to start July 27 and will be on top of its current deployment of HEPA filters, air conditioning, and pressurization systems that already recirculate the air every 2-3 minutes.

Cleaner air than you’d get anywhere else

United says the enhanced process will remove 99.97 percent of “viruses and bacteria” and make the air quality “significantly cleaner than what people typically experience in restaurants, grocery stores, schools or even some hospitals.”

"We know the environment on an aircraft is safe and because the air flow is designed to minimize the transmission of disease, the earlier we maximize air flow over our HEPA filtration system, the better for our crew and our customers," said Scott Kirby, United's chief executive officer. 

United has gone to great lengths to check every single health and safety box it can to try and make travelers comfortable and confident their trip will be coronavirus-free. The airline has a lot riding on those efforts, especially after it misread the tea leaves and announced it was returning to the air at triple its schedule, only to see the pandemic reverse course.

The airline partnered with Clorox and the Cleveland Clinic to improve cleaning procedures. It’s also requiring passengers to complete a pre-boarding checklist, wear a face covering, and board back-to-front and deplane five rows at a time. The airline says it’s also “taking steps” to reduce the overall number of people on board and separate customers “wherever possible.” That last promise comes on the heels of bad press over leaked photos of packed flights.

Protecting travelers

Kirby isn’t giving up on his hopes that the airline will be able to provide a safe experience for its customers.

"The quality of the air, combined with a strict mask policy and regularly disinfected surfaces, are the building blocks towards preventing the spread of COVID-19 on an airplane,” he said.

“We expect that air travel is not likely to get back to normal until we're closer to a widely administered vaccine – so we're in this for the long haul. And I am going to keep encouraging our team to explore and implement new ideas, new technologies, new policies and new procedures that better protect our customers and employees."

Another day, another move by an airline trying to regain consumer trust in the middle of the pandemic.Out of Chicago comes news from United Airlines th...

Article Image

JetBlue and American join forces to share passengers and routes

JetBlue and American Airlines are joining forces in a mutually beneficial partnership designed to offer seamless connectivity for travelers in the Northeastern U.S. and more choices for fliers across their complementary domestic and international networks. 

You can add one more benefit to that for the companies -- taking a huge bite out of Delta and United’s business. Quantifiably, this marriage gives the airlines a 23 percent share of the market, nearly six points ahead of Delta and 10 points ahead of United.

What travelers will see

If all goes according to plan, travelers will be treated to three major benefits from the new partnership, including:

  • New and expanded routes: In the new scenario, American will launch international service from New York’s JFK airport to Tel Aviv, Athens, and Rio De Janeiro on top of their current routes to London and Madrid. Meanwhile, JetBlue will take care of the other two New York airports, LaGuardia and Newark, and focus on East Coast, West Coast, and Southeast routes.With its fingers crossed, American Airlines said that once the COVID-19 pandemic ends, the partnership will be a boost for the company by virtue of adding new long-haul markets in Europe, Africa, India, and South America.

  • More destination choices and loyalty benefits: JetBlue and American will operate interdependent codeshare flights, giving travelers a greater array of schedules, competitive fares, and nonstop access to more destinations. The deal is particularly good for JetBlue, giving the airline connectivity to more U.S. destinations, a broad global network, and an improved frequent flyer proposition. American will complement JetBlue’s improved and expanded service with new international routes. For travelers who are looking for perks, the airlines promise loyalty members that they will enjoy new benefits and that the airlines are exploring additional premium experiences to offer customers.

  • Seamless experience: As you can imagine, interlacing the systems of two airlines could become a can of worms for consumers. American and JetBlue say they’re aware of that pitfall and will be doing all they can to create a “seamless experience,” including the ability to book a single itinerary on either website, convenient connections, and an improved on-the-ground experience.

“This is an incredible opportunity for both of our airlines,” said American Airlines President Robert Isom. “American has a strong history in the Northeast, and we’re proud to partner with JetBlue as the latest chapter in that long history. Together, we can offer customers an industry-leading product in New York and Boston with more flights and more seats to more cities.”

JetBlue and American Airlines are joining forces in a mutually beneficial partnership designed to offer seamless connectivity for travelers in the Northeas...

Article Image

Delta records nearly $4 billion in losses and pulls back on plans to add flights

Just when things were starting to look positive for the airline industry, the pandemic took a turn for the worst. On Tuesday, Delta Air Lines became the first major domestic carrier to respond to the downturn by cutting its schedule back...again.

Despite reducing its daily cash burn by more than 70 percent from when COVID-19 kicked into high gear, the airline still had a $3.9 billion adjusted pre-tax loss for the June quarter on a more than $11 billion decline in revenue over 2019. That alone left Delta with no option but to pull back on its plans to add flights. In reporting the loss, Delta’s CEO Ed Bastian said it “illustrates the truly staggering impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on our business.”

Bastian had been guarded all along, predicting that it could take up to three years for the airline to financially recover from COVID-19. However, the executive pulled back a tad on that three-year mark, saying it would be at least two years before the airline sees a “sustainable recovery.”

“In this difficult environment, the strengths that are core to Delta’s business -- our people, our brand, our network, and our operational reliability -- guide every decision we make, differentiating Delta with our customers and positioning us to succeed when demand returns,” he said.

Consumers are pressing pause

Airlines can take out all the seats and implement all the checklists they want, but with the number of COVID-positive cases spiking again and states rolling back their reopening, consumers are starting to rethink their travel plans. 

Particularly troublesome for Delta is the explosion of cases in Southern U.S. markets, which it has a firm grip on out of its Atlanta hub. Originally, Delta had planned to add 1,000 flights a day starting in August, but Bastian says that number has been cut in half.

"Those factors are causing consumers to pause," Bastian said in comments given CNBC. "At the start of the pandemic, we said this recovery was going to be choppy. Indeed, it's been choppy. Demand has stalled as the virus has grown."

Just when things were starting to look positive for the airline industry, the pandemic took a turn for the worst. On Tuesday, Delta Air Lines became the fi...

Article Image

United Airlines reportedly comes to terms with pilots union over early retirements and voluntary furloughs

As airlines try to gain a profitable footing in the middle of the COVID-19 conundrum, United Airlines is following in American, Delta, Southwest, and JetBlue’s footsteps by cutting a deal with its 13,000-strong pilots union on furloughs and early retirement packages.

Full details have yet to be published, but in a note sent to the pilots by the union and viewed by CNBC, the next step is the ratification of the plan, which could come as soon as next week.

The move is of particular value to United given its aggressive posture of tripling its daily departures. Having fewer paychecks to write can go a long way. The likely scenario is that United and the union will carbon copy much of what the airlines signed off on. As an example, Delta’s deal included partial pay for three years or age 65 (whichever comes first).

“Unfortunately, this may not be the full extent of the furloughs, and we must be prepared for more based on the Company’s plan to be 30 percent smaller next summer,” Capt. Todd Insler, chairman of the United chapter of the Air Line Pilots Association, wrote to members on Thursday.

A juggling act

Both airlines and airline employees are looking at a fish-or-cut-bait deadline of September 30 -- the date they agreed on to keep employees on the payroll, not furlough, or reduce the hourly pay scale. The agreement was the airline industry’s half of the bargain under the Payroll Support Program, which has helped keep them in business during the pandemic.

When the airlines signed off on that promise, the country’s way out of the coronavirus outbreak was starting to look promising, but that’s all changed.

CNBC reports that Delta Air Lines CEO Ed Bastian told his staff in a company memo that the July Fourth weekend was a paltry 20 percent of the passenger load it flew last year. While United is gung-ho about scheduling new flights, Bastian says he’s hesitant about Delta expanding its schedule.

“And while we’re adding back about 1,000 flights systemwide this month, we’re still operating just about 30 percent of our normal July schedule,” Bastian said. “The continued growth of the virus through the Sun Belt, coupled with quarantine restrictions being implemented in large markets in the northern part of the country, give us renewed caution about further schedule additions at this time.”

As airlines try to gain a profitable footing in the middle of the COVID-19 conundrum, United Airlines is following in American, Delta, Southwest, and JetBl...

Article Image

Treasury agrees on terms for coronavirus relief with five airlines

On Thursday, the Treasury Department said it has agreed on terms for coronavirus loans with five major U.S. airlines. The loans were part of a $25 billion emergency loan program established by Congress in March. 

The airlines that have signed letters of intent for the loan terms are American Airlines, Hawaiian Airlines, Sky West Airlines, Spirit Airlines, and Frontier Airlines. 

“We are pleased that major air carriers intend to use this important program and for Treasury to use its authority under the CARES Act to provide much-needed financial assistance, while ensuring appropriate taxpayer compensation,” Secretary Steven T. Mnuchin said in a statement. “Conversations with other airlines continue, and we look forward to finalizing agreements as soon as possible.”

Airlines that borrow money will have to maintain employment levels and limit employee compensation, dividends, and share repurchases to qualify for the CARES Act loans. Carriers will have until September 30 to decide whether to take the loan.

The airline industry was hit hard by the pandemic, and consumers still aren’t particularly confident about resuming air travel. Despite dampened demand for plane tickets, airlines are gradually increasing numbers of available seats and assuring customers that they have enhanced their health and safety procedures. 

On Thursday, the Treasury Department said it has agreed on terms for coronavirus loans with five major U.S. airlines. The loans were part of a $25 billion...

Article Image

JetBlue pilots escape involuntary furloughs in new deal

JetBlue and a pilots union have reached a deal to sidestep any involuntary furloughs until at least May 2021.

In a memo seen by CNBC, the Air Line Pilots Association (ALPA)’s JetBlue chapter signed off on a letter of agreement  that “protects all JetBlue pilots from involuntary furlough -- under any circumstances -- until May 1, 2021.”

There’s never a perfect time for a tete-a-tete with a union, especially with airlines trying to find their way out of the impact from the COVID-19 pandemic. Just two weeks ago, JetBlue said it was adding 30 new domestic routes to serve customers in markets where leisure and travel for visiting friends and relatives were showing some signs of strength. 

The essence of the deal

In the memo, the pilots’ union and the airline shook hands on some “short-term changes” but added an asterisk on an “earlier snapback if demand for flying recovers.” The memo also made the point that there aren’t any planned changes to the collective bargaining agreement that governs pay rates or “significant modifications” to work rules.

“Airline pilots have been on the front lines of this public-health crisis and were part of the first wave of those directly impacted by the associated economic fallout,” the union said in a statement to CNBC.

ConsumerAffairs reached out to JetBlue for comment but had not received any by press time.

Other airlines may face similar situations

In mid-April, U.S.-based airlines accepted billions in coronavirus aid in a bid to keep workers afloat with the intent of avoiding involuntary furloughs. The deadline for that promise will come September 30. It’s like that a large number of layoffs will also occur at that time. 

American Airlines told employees earlier this week that it anticipates having 8,000 more flight attendants than it needs come fall -- almost a third of its 2019 levels.

Delta Air Lines also warned its pilots about possible furloughs and urged any pilot eligible to take an early retirement package to give it serious consideration.

JetBlue and a pilots union have reached a deal to sidestep any involuntary furloughs until at least May 2021.In a memo seen by CNBC, the Air Line Pilot...

Article Image

United Airlines to triple its flight schedule despite COVID-19 concerns

In spite of the upward trend of COVID-19 infections making the skies anything but friendly, United Airlines is going all-in by tripling the size of its August schedule compared to its daily departures in June, adding nearly 25,000 domestic and international flights compared to July. The company says it has plans to fly 40 percent of its overall schedule in August versus the previous year.

The airline thinks that travelers are regaining their confidence about traveling, at least enough to visit getaway destinations that embrace social distancing and friends and family who have been playing it safe and staying out of harm’s way. 

"We're taking the same data-driven, realistic approach to growing our schedule as we did in drawing it down at the start of the pandemic," said Ankit Gupta, United's vice president of Domestic Network Planning. 

"Demand is coming back slowly and we're building in enough capacity to stay ahead of the number of people traveling. And we're adding in flights to places we know customers want to travel to, like outdoor recreation destinations where social distancing is easier but doing so in a way that's flexible and allows us to adjust should that demand change."

The updated routes

Much of United’s 350 additional daily flights starting in August will pass through its hubs -- Chicago, Denver, and Houston -- but the airline will also put a spin on getting to the great outdoors where the coronavirus is less likely to lurk.

Mountain and national park destinations will be the main recipient of that spin. Aspen, Colorado; Bangor, Maine; Bozeman, Montana; and Jackson Hole, Wyoming will all be getting more inbound flights. Internationally, United's August schedule will include a return to Tahiti and additional flights to Hawaii, the Caribbean, and Mexico. 

United says it’s adding more flights to Brussels, Frankfurt, London, Munich, Paris, and Zurich, but that wish may have already met its match with the European Union keeping its borders closed to U.S.-based travelers.

Here are the highlights of United’s reworked schedule, come August:

  • An additional 600 daily flights to more than 200 airports across the U.S.

  • Expanding flights at 147 U.S. airports

  • Increasing connectivity in United's mid-continental hubs, including Chicago, Denver, and Houston

  • Doubling the number of flights out of New York/Newark

  • Gassing up and putting about 90 aircraft back into service

  • Increasing service between Hawaii and all of its hubs

A complete list of United’s schedule changes is available here.

Safety is still a priority

Yes, passenger revenue is important to United, but it can ill afford to risk the health and safety of its passengers. Just like every other airline, United has had to make adjustments and keep improving on its promise to keep travelers safe. 

For the foreseeable future, United has a checklist that every passenger has to complete before they’ll be let on a flight. Chief among its requirements is that all passengers -- including crew members -- have to wear a face covering. If they don’t, then they may not be allowed to board.

In spite of the upward trend of COVID-19 infections making the skies anything but friendly, United Airlines is going all-in by tripling the size of its Aug...

Article Image

Boeing 737 MAX planes set to begin key certification tests

Boeing’s 737 MAX jets, which have been grounded for more than a year, are set to undergo three-days’ worth of key test flights starting June 29. 

Sources familiar with the matter told Reuters that pilots and test crew members will run through a series of “methodically scripted” scenarios designed to intentionally push the reprogrammed MCAS stall-prevention software to its limits.

The MCAS software was found to be a factor in the two fatal 737 MAX crashes that occurred just five months apart. The tests will focus on ensuring that the changes have sufficiently increased the safety and reliability of the software. 

Federal Aviation Administration officials told Reuters that the tests “will include a wide array of flight maneuvers and emergency procedures to enable the agency to assess whether the changes meet FAA certification standards.”

If the initial round of testing doesn’t reveal any issues, FAA Administrator Steve Dickson will board the plane to personally verify its safety before issuing approval. The FAA would then need to approve new pilot training procedures and might not allow the 737 Max to resume passenger flights until September.

While it’s possible that the aircraft could be cleared to resume operations before the end of the year, the recertification process has historically been long and beset with delays.

“Based on how many problems have been uncovered, I would be stunned if the flight tests are ‘one and done,’” a source told the publication. 

Boeing’s 737 MAX jets, which have been grounded for more than a year, are set to undergo three-days’ worth of key test flights starting June 29. Source...

Article Image

American Airlines to begin fully booking flights starting July 1

American Airlines announced Friday that it will sell tickets for every seat on its planes beginning July 1. Previously, the airline was filling its aircraft up to 85 percent capacity in an effort to promote social distancing amid the ongoing coronavirus pandemic. 

"As more people continue to travel, customers may notice that flights are booked to capacity starting July 1," American Airlines said in a press release. 

The airline said it has enhanced its cleaning procedures and will require passengers to wear face coverings while on board. The company previously said it would deny boarding to customers who don’t comply with the rule. 

American will be asking travelers whether they have experienced any symptoms of COVID-19 in the past two weeks. Online and airport check-in kiosks will include a symptom checklist. The company said it will notify customers if their flight will be full and allow them to switch to less crowded flights at no extra cost through September 30. 

“Our customers trust us to make every aspect of their journey safe. We won’t let them down,” said Alison Taylor, American’s chief customer officer, in a statement. “We will continue to refine and update our practices based on the latest information from health authorities and our own Travel Health Advisory Panel.”

Other airlines are taking a more cautious approach to resuming normal operations. Southwest, Alaska, Delta, and JetBlue still have restrictions on passenger capacity. Many airlines are also suspending alcoholic beverage service in response to the pandemic. 

American Airlines announced Friday that it will sell tickets for every seat on its planes beginning July 1. Previously, the airline was filling its aircraf...

Article Image

Delta to restart flights between U.S. and China this week

On Monday, Delta Air Lines announced that it will resume flights between Seattle and Shanghai on June 25 following a suspension of nearly four months due to COVID-19 concerns. 

The airline said a flight between Seattle and Shanghai-Pudong, China (through Seoul-Incheon, South Korea) will operate twice a week. 

“With a mission to connect the world, Delta is committed to getting our customers to their destinations safely and confidently, especially at this critical time. We are implementing unprecedented health and safety measures and practices, so customers are assured of ease and safety at all points of their journey,” Wong Hong, Delta's president of Greater China and Singapore, said in a statement on Monday. 

New health measures

To prevent the spread of COVID-19, Delta will require all passengers to wear face coverings both in the airport and while in the cabin. The airline said it will also be sanitizing all aircraft, changing its boarding process from back to front, and requesting that customers bring their own food and beverages to minimize contact with employees.

Additionally, Delta won’t be selling tickets for middle seats and will limit its passenger capacity to 60 percent capacity in the main cabin to promote social distancing. Delta added that it’s “constantly updating best practices and improving the new standard of care based on expert medical advice and the feedback of customers.”

The restarting of Delta’s service between the U.S. in China comes a week after the Department of Transportation (DOT) announced that airlines could continue four flights per week between the two countries. 

The DOT said it will “continue to press for the full restoration of passenger air travel between the United States and China,” in part to allow Chinese students impacted by the flight shortage to fly home. 

“As the Chinese government allows more flights by U.S. carriers, we will reciprocate,” the agency added. 

Delta is the first airline to resume flights to China. United Airlines is expected to restart flights to the country soon.

On Monday, Delta Air Lines announced that it will resume flights between Seattle and Shanghai on June 25 following a suspension of nearly four months due t...

Article Image

Airlines require face masks and ban alcohol on flights in response to COVID-19

Did you ever think there would come a time when airlines would require every passenger to wear a mask AND stop selling alcohol? Welcome to the new norm, folks.

One by one, airlines have been drawing new lines in the sand with new coronavirus-related restrictions. For example, United Airlines issued a comprehensive list of mandates last week that included confirmation from passengers that they have not had close contact with someone who tested positive for COVID-19 in the two weeks before the flight they're boarding.

Thanks to Airlines for America (A4A), the industry trade organization representing the leading domestic carriers, airlines will no longer be doing their own thing when it comes to face coverings.

In an all-in move, Alaska Airlines, American Airlines, Delta Air Lines, Hawaiian Airlines, JetBlue Airways, Southwest Airlines, and United Airlines have all agreed on a sweeping, uniform, health mask policy.

Revoked flying privileges

A4A says its entire membership will be “vigorously” enforcing face-covering policies for both passengers and crew. By “vigorously,” the organization means that face coverings will have to cover both the nose and mouth, not just hanging from the ear on an as-needed basis. 

Here’s what airlines and travelers will be expected to do.

  • Preflight Communications: Each airline will inform its individual face-covering policy in all communications with customers (e.g., email and reservation confirmations), which may require passengers to tick a box saying they acknowledge the specific rules during the check-in process.

  • Onboard Announcements: Aboard each flight, crew members will announce details regarding their airline’s face covering policy, including the consequences passengers could face for not adhering to the policy.

  • Consequences for Noncompliance: Rather than a uniform punishment, each carrier will be expected to create the appropriate consequences for passengers who are found to be in noncompliance with the airline’s face covering policy. A4A says the airlines have broad powers in this regard -- “up to and including suspension of flying privileges on that airline.”

American Airlines, for one, says its line on masks is hard and fast; the company says it will deny boarding to customers who don’t comply. Adding an extra dare, American says it may also deny future travel for customers who refuse to wear a face covering. 

Dry flights

While consumers turned to alcohol to relieve stress caused by COVID-19 and produced a sales boom, the airlines have decided to put their alcoholic beverages under lock and key for the near future, despite what profit might be had.

U.S. airlines like Delta, Southwest, and American, along with European carriers including Easyjet and KLM, and Asia-centric Virgin Australia, are all suspending either some or part of their alcoholic beverage service in response to the coronavirus. If a cocktail is a must, some airlines will have them available in First Class and/or on long-haul international flights. 

The changes may sound drastic, but the airlines can’t run the risk of the added interaction between passengers and crew members. Passengers should also be prepared for limitations on other beverages. As an example, Southwest Airlines and Virgin Australia are serving water only for the time being.

Did you ever think there would come a time when airlines would require every passenger to wear a mask AND stop selling alcohol? Welcome to the new norm, fo...

Article Image

United Airlines puts new pre-boarding health checklist in place

Place your shoes and belt in the tray… take out your laptop and turn it on… and take a self-administered health assessment.

Yep, that's where the post-pandemic travel world may be headed. United Airlines raised the bar on health and safety on Wednesday by becoming the first major U.S. airline to ask passengers to complete a health self-assessment during their check-in process. 

“I promise…”

Partnering with the Cleveland Clinic, United's "Ready-to-Fly" checklist asks travelers to verify that they have not experienced COVID-19-related symptoms in the 14 days before boarding their outbound flight. The checklist is an add-on to the airline’s previously announced Clean Plus initiative.

"As people are returning to their daily activities during the COVID-19 pandemic, their health and safety – as well as the health and safety of others - should continue to be top-of-mind," said Dr. James Merlino, Chief Clinical Transformation Officer at Cleveland Clinic.

"Our health experts are pleased to play a role in helping people travel more safely and we worked closely with United to develop a health self-assessment for its customers to better ensure precautions are taken before beginning their journey."

United’s new checklist

Following guidelines set forth by the Cleveland Clinic, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), and the World Health Organization (WHO), United's Ready-to-Fly checklist requires each passenger to electronically or verbally commit to several details before receiving a boarding pass. Those include:

  • Confirming that they have not been diagnosed with COVID-19 in the last three weeks or experienced any of the typical symptoms in the past two weeks;

  • Confirming they have not been denied boarding by another airline due to medical screening for infectious disease in the last two weeks; and

  • Confirming that they have not had close contact with someone who tested positive for COVID-19 in the two weeks before the flight they're boarding.

Follow the rules or reschedule

United's checklist also ensures fliers are committed to the airline's other safety measures, like wearing a face covering -- a new mandate for anyone (passengers and crew) flying on United. 

United says that customers who don't meet these requirements and choose not to travel can reschedule their flights. However, its statement on the change did not say whether a passenger who can’t or won’t verify their health will be kept from boarding.

Expect other airlines to follow suit

United's not the lone ranger in this move. Alaska Airlines has also instituted a pre-travel and wellness agreement much akin to United's, and other airlines may follow suit. 

The tipping point, as you can imagine, is where safety and economics collide. For example, Delta Air Lines has put a cap on passenger loads and blocked off middle seats to maximize social distancing; United's move allows for more passengers who vow that their fellow fliers are out of harm's way.

Place your shoes and belt in the tray… take out your laptop and turn it on… and take a self-administered health assessment.Yep, that's where the post-p...

Article Image

Airline executives say major changes could be ahead as the industry recovers from the pandemic

As airlines find their way out of the pandemic-driven detour, industry executives are again calling for changes to help travelers feel good about flying.

Speaking at a webinar hosted by the Washington Post, JetBlue CEO Robin Hayes predicted that some of the old ways of doing things won’t work in the new normal.  

Hayes said airlines will find it difficult to resume their previous practices for change and cancellation fees when the COVID-19 pandemic subsides.

Change fees may be going away

At the top of Hayes’ predictions is a rethinking of how airlines sell ticketed products.

“It’s not going to be acceptable, I don’t think, for somebody who is unwell to feel that they are being made to fly,” Hayes speculated. “And so, I think airlines are going to have to think about how they monetize their fare structure, how they create products that give people the ability to change flights more easily than in the past.” 

To Hayes’ point about fare structure, one thing he thinks should be tossed out is the as-much-as $200 change fees, much like they did during the COVID-19 outbreak and Hurricane Florence. That change would surely be a blow to airlines. In 2019, the major U.S. carriers took in nearly $3 billion in reservation and cancellation fees according to the Department of Transportation -- $195 million for the Hayes-run JetBlue alone.

Low fares could become the norm

Southwest Airlines CEO Gary Kelly predicts that at the end of the industry’s pandemic recovery, consumers will see low airfares as the norm. Speaking in his weekly video update to employees, Kelly laid out his vision in no uncertain terms.

“We’ll compete hard for customers, understanding it will be a brutal, low-fare environment as there are far more airline seats, and there will be for some time, than there are customers,” he said.

“Our low-cost philosophy, strategy and structure will serve us very well. We’ll continue to offer low fares with no change fees, no bag fees and a safe environment when our customers are ready to fly."

Consumers should expect a lot of variables

One aviation consultant agrees that getting to that win-win spot where both the airlines and the consumers are happy will be a rollercoaster ride.

In comments made to the Dallas Morning News, David Banmiller predicts two things: one, that airlines will be inclined to fill up seats to substantiate the monstrous overhead costs of getting a plane in the air and passengers from point-to-point. And, secondly, much of the rebound will be dependent on how aggressive airlines will get in fighting for routes they compete with others for.

“Fares will be all over the place,” Banmiller said. 

ConsumerAffairs is already seeing Banmiller’s predictions come true. In a sample Google Flights search for a roundtrip from Austin (AUS) to New York LaGuardia (LGA) leaving on June 18 and returning on June 22, we found airfares as low as $293 and as high as $697.

As airlines find their way out of the pandemic-driven detour, industry executives are again calling for changes to help travelers feel good about flying....

Article Image

American Airlines to cut 30 percent of its management and administrative staff

Airline stocks have rallied on Wall Street this week on growing optimism that the country is beginning to reopen and travel is about to resume. But the rising stock prices don’t reveal the economic damage to commercial air travel that’s already been done.

American Airlines has announced it is cutting 30 percent of its management and administrative staff in an effort to stem the flow of red ink. A company memo obtained by CNBC said the airline will also begin offering buyouts to flight attendants and other frontline personnel in June.

“We must plan for operating a smaller airline for the foreseeable future,” Elise Eberwein, one of the airline’s executive vice presidents, wrote in a letter to employees Wednesday.

American has plenty of company in that situation because the entire industry has been turned upside down by the coronavirus (COVID-19). Consumers stopped flying well before the government issued travel restrictions. By late April, U.S. passenger traffic had fallen 90 percent.

In the last decade, the airline industry has clawed its way back to profitability by maximizing routes -- flying planes in which every seat was sold -- and charging fees for things that were once included in the price of a ticket. Those days seem to be over.

Half-empty planes

In the era of social distancing -- which no one expects to end anytime soon -- American and its competitors will likely fly half-empty planes, even when consumers begin traveling again. In an announcement made Wednesday, American said it would continue to limit the number of customers on each aircraft. 

“Additionally, American customer service agents also may reassign seats to create more space between customers or to accommodate families who need to be seated together,” the airline said in a release. “Once boarding is complete — taking into consideration any aircraft weight or balance restrictions — customers can move to another seat within their ticketed cabin subject to availability.”

The airline said it is deploying new tools that will allow customers to more easily change their tickets to less-crowded flights, again giving up the fees that most airlines once charged for that service.

Strings attached

The problem for the industry -- and American in particular -- is that at the same time it is struggling against mounting financial losses, it has received financial aid from Congress that has several strings attached.

A week ago, when Delta and JetBlue decided to reduce employee hours to cope with their loss of revenue, lawmakers were quick to say the action represented a violation of the goal of the Payroll Support Program established under the CARES Act. 

Delta received more than $5 billion in federal support through the program, and JetBlue received $935 million. When they cut employee hours more than a dozen U.S. senators sent letters to the CEO of each airline pushing for an immediate end to the “potentially illegal” action. 

In April, American announced that it was receiving $5.8 billion from the government to support payroll operations.

Airline stocks have rallied on Wall Street this week on growing optimism that the country is beginning to reopen and travel is about to resume. But the ris...

Article Image

Boeing resumes production of Boeing 737 MAX planes

Boeing said Wednesday that it has restarted production of its 737 MAX jetliners, which last year crashed twice in the span of five months. The crashes killed a total of 346 people and prompted officials to pull the planes from service. 

Boeing’s 737 MAX has been grounded worldwide since March 2019. The company paused production of the aircraft in January after it became evident that the flying restrictions would remain in place for longer than anticipated.

Production will be restarted “at a low rate,” Boeing said Wednesday, adding that it has implemented “more than a dozen initiatives focused on enhancing workplace safety and product quality.”

The coronavirus pandemic has added another layer of uncertainty to Boeing’s outlook for the near future since flight cancellations have surged in recent months. 

Recertification pending 

Boeing has encountered a number of delays in the 737’s recertification process. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) still hasn’t cleared the aircraft to resume service, and Boeing hasn’t said whether the agency is close to doing so. 

“Work on the project continues, as does our steadfast refusal to speculate on a timeframe for completing it,” the FAA said in a statement.

Investigations carried out in the wake of the crashes revealed that numerous software glitches and a faulty MCAS flight control system contributed to the crashes.  

“We’ve been on a continuous journey to evolve our production system and make it even stronger,” said Walt Odisho, vice president and general manager of the 737 program, in a statement. “These initiatives are the next step in creating the optimal build environment for the 737 MAX.”

With COVID-19 continuing to impact travel, Boeing is making efforts to cut costs. The company recently announced that it would be laying off nearly 7,000 employees. Ultimately, Boeing aims to pare down its staff of 160,000 by 10 percent due to low demand for new planes. 

Boeing said Wednesday that it has restarted production of its 737 MAX jetliners, which last year crashed twice in the span of five months. The crashes kill...

Article Image

Delta, JetBlue criticized by lawmakers for cutting employee hours after receiving coronavirus relief

Delta Air Lines and JetBlue have each decided to reduce employee hours in the midst of the coronavirus pandemic, and lawmakers say the action represents a violation of the goal of the Payroll Support Program established under the CARES Act. 

Delta received more than $5 billion in federal support through the program, and JetBlue received $935 million. Despite receiving the money, the airlines still decided to scale back employee hours.

This week, more than a dozen U.S. senators sent letters to the CEO of each airline pushing for an immediate end to the “potentially illegal” action. 

“Your decision to cut employee hours is inconsistent with congressional intent and is a blatant and potentially illegal effort to skirt your requirements to keep workers on payroll, and you should reverse this policy immediately,” the senators wrote.

Money doled out as part of the program was supposed to be used to keep front line workers -- including flight attendants, pilots, and mechanics -- employed during the pandemic. Before accepting the funds, airlines had to agree to certain conditions; one condition was that they must keep workers on the payroll through September 30. 

Violates the intent of the law

The senators noted in their letter to Delta that the airline “was reportedly the first airline to cut hours for employees after receiving assistance from the CARES Act.” In a letter to JetBlue, the senators pointed out that the airline has slashed hours for mechanics, passenger service agents, and ramp workers after receiving government support.

JetBlue said in a statement that its offer of voluntary time off and unpaid leave programs complied with the CARES Act requirements and was necessary since the payroll assistance only covers two-thirds of costs. The airline also said that due to the drop in air travel due to COVID-19 fears, “there are quite literally no hours for our crew members to work in many places.” 

Delta also argued that its action was compliant with the CARES Act and that reducing work hours would ultimately protect jobs. 

But the senators said in the letter that reductions in hours goes against the “clear intent” of the law. The senators said Delta and JetBlue should not accept any more government money unless they are “prepared to protect your workers’ jobs, pay and benefits as intended by Congress in the CARES Act.”

“Your federal financial assistance is conditioned on keeping your promises to workers,” the letters said.

Delta Air Lines and JetBlue have each decided to reduce employee hours in the midst of the coronavirus pandemic, and lawmakers say the action represents a...

Article Image

U.S. airlines start to see a break in the clouds with reservations outpacing cancellations

Now that the COVID-19 clouds are starting to part, it looks like airlines are beginning to gear up for their return to the skies. Delta Air Lines, Southwest, and United all reported on Tuesday that their bookings are running ahead of cancellations for the first time in a while.

It's no giant leap forward, but the airlines were in an insufferable position -- probably more than any sector. Their only way out was to pledge assets in return for millions in bailout money that Congress granted to keep them from going under. 

If the early news holds steady, the forecast that the airline industry won’t be back in full swing until 2023 might have to be shortened a bit. Here are what the four biggest airlines have to say.

American Airlines

In an American Airlines video conference viewed by ConsumerAffairs, company brass said they are "pretty well situated … to take advantage of a domestic rebound. And we do estimate it will be domestic-focused when it does come back (and) estimate that it will be more leisure than business."

American officials said they expect changes as a result of the pandemic, and "will be incredibly flexible in terms of our capacity." But they wanted it to be made known that a low-load factor is not the goal long-term.

Southwest Airlines

Southwest said in a filing that it is set to cut capacity by as much as 55 percent next month from a year ago. Like American, Southwest thinks that its flights will still be somewhat sparse -- a load factor in the neighborhood of 35 to 45 percent.

As far as Southwest's bottom line is concerned, the ink is still red. The company has experienced a modest improvement in passenger demand and bookings for June 2020. Still, the operating revenues are estimated to decrease somewhere in the range of 80 to 85 percent year-over-year. Nonetheless, the airline isn't making any steadfast commitments or promises. 

"The revenue environment remains uncertain and may require additional capacity reductions depending on passenger demand," the company noted in the filing.

Delta Air Lines

In an investor presentation reported on by CNN, Delta also said its bookings have shown marked improvement. While new reservations aren't yet outpacing passenger cancellations 24/7, they're moving in that direction. 

"We have seen a little bit of a bounce off the bottom," Delta CFO Paul Jacobson said. "My caution is not to draw too many conclusions. But there are reasons to be encouraged. Delta is being careful to make sure the improved bookings turn into actual tickets and that they are not canceled as passengers' dates of travel get closer."

Delta is adding close to 100 flights a day going through June, but it -- unlike Southwest and American -- is at half-capacity because of the empty middle seat promise it made to consumers last month.

United Airlines

United also had good news in the cancellation department, saying that cancellation rates have fallen. It anticipates ticket demand for both domestic flights and some international destinations to improve by the end of June. 

And its capacity situation? As far as that's concerned, United's crystal ball isn't as promising as its competitors. The company expects its scheduled capacity for July 2020 to be down close to 75 percent compared to a year ago. But at least it's going in the right direction, marking an improvement from the 90 percent cut it had to apply in resetting its May and June schedules.

Now that the COVID-19 clouds are starting to part, it looks like airlines are beginning to gear up for their return to the skies. Delta Air Lines, Southwes...

Article Image

Don’t plan on air travel returning to normal until 2023, airline official says

While the pandemic-triggered upheaval of the airline industry in the U.S. was dramatic enough, the damage is even worse around the world.

The International Air Transport Association (IATA) has released a new evaluation of the global airline industry’s post-pandemic life. It estimates that things might not return to normal until 2023. If that sounds pessimistic, well, it is, and for a good reason.

It’ll take money and consumer confidence

The IATA took a lot of factors into consideration in its forecast: quarantine measures on arrival and globally harmonized biosecurity measures chief among them.

“Major stimulus from governments combined with liquidity injections by central banks will boost the economic recovery once the pandemic is under control,” said Alexandre de Juniac, IATA’s Director General and CEO.

“But rebuilding passenger confidence will take longer. And even then, individual and corporate travelers are likely to carefully manage travel spend and stay closer to home.”  

Best and worst case scenarios

As a baseline, de Juniac says domestic markets have to reopen by this fall while expecting a slower phased opening of international markets. 

Also, global passenger demand (measured in revenue passenger kilometers) can’t dip any further. At the moment, it’s running about 24 percent lower than 2019 and 32 percent lower than IATA’s forecast for 2021.

And the worst-case scenario? If lockdowns extend into the fall and there is a slower opening of economies, de Juniac thinks that double-whammy would further delay the air travel industry’s recovery.

Travelers have to feel good about flying, too

De Juniac knows that nothing’s going to happen unless there are passengers aboard those airplanes. His organization’s research uncovered the fact that 86 percent of travelers were somewhat or very concerned about being quarantined while traveling, and 69 percent of recent travelers wouldn’t step foot on a plane if it involved a 14-day quarantine period.

“We need a solution for safe travel that addresses two challenges. It must give passengers the confidence to travel safely and without undue hassle. And it must give governments confidence that they are protected from importing the virus,” said de Juniac.

To help travelers feel more confident, the IATA proposes a risk-based layering of temporary non-quarantine measures until there’s a viable vaccine, immunity passports, or nearly instant COVID-19 testing available at scale.

The critical element in boosting confidence is getting everyone on the same page -- especially individual governments around the world.

“The COVID-19 Aviation Recovery Task Force (CART) has a very big job to do with little time to waste. It must find an agreement among states on the measures needed to control COVID-19 as aviation re-starts. And it must build confidence among governments that borders can be opened to travelers because a layered approach of measures has been properly implemented globally. IATA and the whole industry support this critical work,” said de Juniac.

While the pandemic-triggered upheaval of the airline industry in the U.S. was dramatic enough, the damage is even worse around the world.The Internatio...

Article Image

DOT addresses airline refunds and carrier obligations in new guidance

Early Tuesday, U.S. Secretary of Transportation Elaine L. Chao delivered good news to consumers and a little of both good and bad news to the airline industry. 

For the consumers, the DOT stepped up its enforcement concerning ticket refunds brought on by the pandemic. And for the airlines? A little breather on their total service obligation.

For the consumers

Given the sloth-like pace the airlines were moving at to fulfill the DOT's mandate on refunds vs. vouchers, the Department felt it had no recourse but to tell the airlines that they needed to shape up. 

According to Chao's office, the DOT received more than 25,000 air travel service complaints and inquiries between March and April -- many of which concerned refunds. In a typical month, it might receive only about 1,500.

"The Department has received an unprecedented volume of complaints from passengers and is examining this issue closely to ensure that airlines' policies and practices conform to DOT's refund rules," said Secretary Chao. 

"The Department is asking all airlines to revisit their customer service policies and ensure they are as flexible and considerate as possible to the needs of passengers who face financial hardship during this time."

To help travelers holding tickets and wondering what the best steps to take are, the DOT has produced a guide covering questions such as:

  • What rights do passengers have if an airline cancels a flight or makes a significant schedule change? What is a "significant change" or "cancellation" requiring a refund?

  • What rights do passengers have if they choose not to travel due to safety or health concerns related to the COVID-19 public health emergency?

  • What rights do passengers have if they choose not to travel due to safety or health concerns related to the COVID-19 public health emergency?

  • May airlines and ticket agents retroactively apply new refund policies?

  • May airlines or ticket agents offer credits or vouchers to consumers instead of refunds?

  • How quickly must airlines and ticket agents process refunds?

The answers to those questions can be found here, but a fair warning -- the Department couched its notice purely as “guidance,” saying that “it does not have the force and effect of law and is not meant to bind the regulated entities in any way.” 

Consumers who have additional questions are encouraged to contact the DOT directly at this email address: C70Notice@dot.gov.

For the airlines

When it comes to airlines’ service obligations, the Department relaxed its position a bit. Rather than force airlines to serve the same number of markets they did before COVID-19, the DOT now gives airlines the green light to "reduce the number of points they must serve as a proportion of their total service obligation."

To that end, the Department simply asks the carriers to make sure that at least one airline continues to cover every community. That might require some arm wrestling, though. There are lots of markets where multiple airlines fly the same route. For example, between Cincinnati (CVG) and Atlanta (ATL), there are five different airlines that fly the same route; four airlines that fly Dallas (DFW) to Seattle (SEA); and five that fly Orlando (ORL) to New York's LaGuardia (LGA).

Remember who's in charge

Secretary Chao didn't pull any punches in reminding airlines who's in charge when it comes to the requirements they need to follow under the Coronavirus Aid, Recovery, and Economic Security (CARES) Act. 

The legislation authorized the Secretary to require an airline carrier receiving financial assistance under the act to maintain scheduled air transportation service "to the extent reasonable and practicable" to any point served by that air carrier before March 1, 2020. 

And if the airlines don't like Chao's updated directives? They have until May 18 to respond to the service obligation adjustments notice. The trade association Airlines For America (A4A) said that airlines are doing everything they can to comply with the government’s request.

“U.S. carriers have worked since the early stages of this pandemic to respond to customers and update travel policies to offer increased flexibility,” the organization told ConsumerAffairs. “We understand that these are difficult times for our country, our passengers, and our employees. U.S. airlines remain committed to making accommodations that are responsive to travelers’ needs during this unprecedented time.”

Early Tuesday, U.S. Secretary of Transportation Elaine L. Chao delivered good news to consumers and a little of both good and bad news to the airline indus...

Article Image

Airline lobbyist asks Congress to ease up on minimum flight requirements under the CARES Act

The flailing airline industry’s cause to come out of the COVID pandemic with its wings up got some much-needed championing on Wednesday.

The CEO and President of Airlines for America (A4A) -- a lobbying group which represents Alaska Airlines, American, Delta, JetBlue, Southwest, and United -- appeared before a Senate hearing to speak about the impact that the COVID-19 pandemic has had on the commercial aviation industry. 

A4A’s Nicholas Calio wanted to make sure he got one important point across. He stated that federally-dictated minimums on the number of flights as part of the federal airline bailout are “unsustainable” for airlines while the pandemic is still in full swing and its passenger loads have taken a pounding.

“While carriers are certainly complying with the CARES Act requirement and (Department of Transportation) Show Cause Order requiring minimum service levels to U.S. communities, the cost associated with operating nearly empty flights to communities with little to no demand significantly exacerbates air carrier liquidity,” Calio said in a prepared statement. 

“We would ask both this Committee and the Administration to seek solutions to address the challenges posed by this unsustainable requirement. Make no mistake, as the duration of this pandemic lingers, the reasonability and practicality of this requirement significantly diminishes. Carriers and communities alike are going to have to come together and acknowledge the footprint and frequency of service in 2019 cannot convey to the 2020 COVID-19 pandemic reality,” he said.

The bottom line for the airline industry

Airlines have greatly cut back on the number of flights since the virus became headline news -- even going to the extreme of canceling flights and sardining passengers on another flight to be more efficient. 

Still, the bottom line for the airline industry is, in fact, the bottom line. Until the industry can regroup from being 90 percent down thanks to COVID-19, Calio bluntly told the Committee that “the cost associated with operating nearly empty flights to communities with little to no demand significantly exacerbates air carrier liquidity.”

“Screwing the taxpayers”

Lawmakers and airline operators are anything but on the same page on this situation. Committee member Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-CT) said the people he represents have grumbled that airlines are handing out vouchers, not cash refunds like they’re supposed to when they up and cancel a flight. 

“In effect, you are -- forgive me -- screwing the very taxpayers whose money is going into your pockets” through the $50 billion in federal aid set aside for passenger airlines in the CARES Act, Blumenthal said.

The flailing airline industry’s cause to come out of the COVID pandemic with its wings up got some much-needed championing on Wednesday.The CEO and Pre...

Article Image

United Airlines executive suggests employees should voluntarily leave the company

In an interesting play, United Airlines COO Greg Hart is suggesting that the company’s 93,000 employees give some consideration to voluntarily leaving the company while it wrestles with the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic.

In a leaked memo to United Airlines staffers obtained by CNN Business, Hart said the airline will need to "right size" its workforce.

"You may want to seriously consider if you're in a position to take a voluntary separation," he wrote. "You, alone, can decide if a [Voluntary Separation Program] works for you and your family."

Everyone’s affected

Apparently, no one at United is safe from some sort of salary consequence. In the memo, Hart shared that executive salaries have been cut and that the memo’s purpose was to simply allow the airline to be transparent with its staff, top to bottom.

Unfortunately for United, it doesn’t have as many options as it usually does when it comes to parting with its staff. The company currently can’t lay anyone off for the next six months due to the federal financial assistance package deal that gives United close to $5 billion in relief money. But as soon as the airline completes that guarantee, it appears that it will be ready to start slashing staff. 

According to a memo seen by Reuters, United has plans for at least 3,400 management and administrative positions to be cut come October, and it has told pilots to be prepared for a “displacement” that could impact approximately 30 percent of its 12,250 pilots. All told, that’s about 7,000 workers.

“We have to acknowledge that there will be serious consequences to our company if we don’t continue to take strong and decisive action, which includes making decisions that none of us ever wanted or expected to make,” Kate Gebo, United’s executive vice president of human resources and labor relations, was quoted in the memo.

In an interesting play, United Airlines COO Greg Hart is suggesting that the company’s 93,000 employees give some consideration to voluntarily leaving the...

Article Image

Spirit joins other airlines in announcing mandatory face mask requirement

To slow the spread of the novel coronavirus, Spirit Airlines has announced that it will require passengers to wear face masks starting May 11. The airline joins others that are implementing the policy. 

Passengers on United, Delta, and JetBlue will be required to wear them starting Monday, May 4, and Spirit’s new policy will take effect the same day as American, Southwest, and Alaska. Delta, United, and JetBlue flight attendants had already begun wearing face masks. 

In announcing the same policy last week, Joanna Geraghty, JetBlue's president and chief operating officer, said that wearing a mask was the “new flying etiquette.” 

Masks mandatory

Despite the impact of COVID-19, people are still flying, albeit not in numbers as high as a year ago. Roughly 134,000 travelers passed through airport security checkpoints on Saturday, according to the Transportation Security Administration (TSA). A year ago, that figure was 1.9 million. 

Airlines including Southwest, United, American, and Allegiant Air are providing face masks for passengers that forget to bring their own. Spirit passengers will have to bring their own face masks and wear them at the airport and throughout the flight. The airline said young children who can't keep a mask on will be exempt from the new policy. 

Allegiant Airlines -- which is encouraging but not requiring passengers to wear a mask -- said most customers have already begun wearing a mask. 

"We find that most passengers have already adopted this as a practice," said Allegiant spokeswoman Hilarie Grey. 

To slow the spread of the novel coronavirus, Spirit Airlines has announced that it will require passengers to wear face masks starting May 11. The airline...

Article Image

Regulators raise concerns about safety issues in Boeing's 737 MAX assembly line

The Boeing 737 MAX jet is currently in production in the wake of being grounded over safety issues, and now federal prosecutors are raising alarm about potential safety shortcomings on the assembly line. 

The Wall Street Journal reported Tuesday that the U.S. Department of Justice and the Federal Aviation Administration are both investigating safety problems on the assembly lines of the planes. 

Inspections found that rags and other debris was left in the fuel tanks or other interior spaces of roughly half of undelivered 737 MAX jets. Debris may be present as a result of “quality-control lapses,” according to the Journal.

The investigations being carried out are in addition to a grand jury probe of the MAX’s flight control systems, which were found to have been a key factor in two crashes that killed 346 people. 

Boeing didn’t comment on the investigations, but the company said it launched an internal investigation and took corrective actions after finding debris in undelivered 737 MAX planes.

“Safely returning the 737 MAX to service is our top priority,” Boeing said in a statement.

Boeing’s beleaguered 737 MAX jet is expected to remain grounded until at least August, sources familiar with the matter told Reuters. Earlier this month, the company said it needed to make two new software updates to the plane’s flight control computer.

The Boeing 737 MAX jet is currently in production in the wake of being grounded over safety issues, and now federal prosecutors are raising alarm about pot...

Article Image

Airbnb puts new cleaning protocols in place to safeguard renters

Since COVID-19 came on the scene, most every company that makes its living off of travel has had to completely rethink its model. 

Now, while things are still in limbo and there’s time to revamp, Airbnb is in all-hands-on-deck mode to make sure that members’ rentals are ready -- and safe -- for guests when the pandemic subsides.

The first thing the company is introducing in that regard is a new cleaning protocol for hosts. Bringing in former U.S. Surgeon General Dr. Vivek Murthy as a consultant, Airbnb is launching its “Enhanced Cleaning Initiative.” The program is described as “the first overarching standardized protocol for cleaning and sanitization in the home sharing industry … (and) informed by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).”

“As a society, we need to observe the physical distancing recommendations made by public health officials while finding ways to preserve and strengthen human connection,” said Dr. Murthy.

“I’m looking forward to helping the Airbnb community as it develops a health and science based approach for safe travel lodging and experiences. These approaches will continue to evolve as our knowledge and understanding of COVID-19 grows.”

The new guidelines

Airbnb officials think its hosts are already doing a good job, but applying the extra grease won’t hurt. 

“This effort builds off of Airbnb’s strong historical track record of cleanliness: To date 94 percent of all Airbnb reviews show that guests are satisfied with cleaning, scoring it at 4 or 5 stars after their stays,” the company said.

When the new protocol officially launches in May, guidelines will include the following requirements from each host:

  • Taking part in a learning and certification program.

  • Using personal protective equipment, like masks and gloves for hosts or their cleaners, as well as disinfectants that are approved by regulatory authorities.

  • A CDC-recommended 24-hour wait period before entering.

This begs the question of what will happen if a host can’t commit to Airbnb’s new rules? The company said in a news release that those hosts can alternatively opt into a new feature called Booking Buffer, which will create a vacancy period of at least 72 hours between stays. During that three-day span, reservations will automatically be blocked. 

Since COVID-19 came on the scene, most every company that makes its living off of travel has had to completely rethink its model. Now, while things are...

Article Image

Delta CEO says it could take up to three years for the airline to financially recover from COVID-19

Delta Air Lines CEO Ed Bastian told the airline’s workforce that it might take as long as three years before the carrier gets back to its pre-COVID-19 strength.

In a face-to-face interview with CNBC, Bastian said that its current average passenger load is about 5 percent of what it would typically be carrying. Bastian fleshed out that number’s impact on Delta’s bottom line in its March Quarter 2020 Financial Results. 

“We are confident that people will begin to travel again. We don’t know when it will happen, but we do know that Delta will be a smaller airline for some time, and we should be prepared for a choppy, sluggish recovery even after the virus is contained. I estimate the recovery period could take two to three years,” he told airline workers in a separate memo.

Doing all it takes to stay afloat

No airline has proven itself immune to the pandemic’s bite. In Delta’s case, it’s looking down the barrel of a net loss of $534 million in the first quarter -- more than a billion dollars off what it earned over the same timeframe in 2019. 

Delta has tried nearly every trick in the book to make travelers feel safe enough to fly again, too -- from blocking out middle seats to fogging each plane every night to make sure it’s fully sanitized. 

“Delta is taking decisive action to prioritize the safety of our employees and customers while protecting our business and bolstering liquidity. I am especially proud of the incredible work the Delta people are doing to keep our nation’s airways open, playing an active role in the fight,” Bastian said.

When Bastian refers to the company’s liquidity, it’s got some insulation. Delta ended the first quarter of 2020 with $6.0 billion in unrestricted liquidity, so it can probably take on some water. However, it was particularly difficult for the airline to stomach the downturn because it has gone more than five years without taking a loss.

Delta Air Lines CEO Ed Bastian told the airline’s workforce that it might take as long as three years before the carrier gets back to its pre-COVID-19 stre...

Article Image

U.S. Treasury releases $2.9 billion in airline support and puts final touches on payroll agreements

On Monday, the U.S. Department of the Treasury put the final touches on its Payroll Support Program deal with Allegiant Air, American Airlines, Delta Air Lines, Southwest Airlines, Spirit Airlines, and United Airlines. The agreement releases $2.9 billion in initial payments to support airline flight attendants, pilots, and other workers, but it also helps shield the aviation industry from collapsing.

Alaska Airlines, Frontier Airlines, Hawaiian Airlines, JetBlue Airways, and SkyWest Airlines weren’t part of Monday’s agreement, but all those companies have said that they plan to participate in the program. All told, the airlines represent close to 95 percent of the U.S. airline capacity. 

More if necessary

The Treasury said it’s open to supplementary payments to the airlines on a rolling basis, but only as long as the funds are used for the continuation of payment of employee wages, salaries, and benefits. 

United Airlines wasted no time, saying it was seeking $4.5 billion in loans from the program. Last week, American said it was asking for a $4.75 billion loan under that program, while both Alaska and Horizon said they, too, were getting things together to ask for $1.1 billion in loans.

“The Payroll Support Program is critical to supporting American workers and preserving our airline industry, which is a vital part of the U.S. economy,” Treasury Secretary Steve Mnuchin said in a statement. “We continue to work quickly to deliver this needed relief.” 

The Treasury gets something out of this deal, too

Consumers shouldn’t worry about the U.S. government handing the airlines all this money free-and-clear. Under the CARES Act, the Treasury’s making sure that the airlines get the help they need, but the carriers are still on the hook for repaying 30 percent of it back and granting the Treasury warrants equivalent to 10 percent of the total amount borrowed. 

Smaller companies do have an extra benefit added into the deal. Airlines taking out loans for $100 million or less are not required to repay anything or issue any warrants to the government.

On Monday, the U.S. Department of the Treasury put the final touches on its Payroll Support Program deal with Allegiant Air, American Airlines, Delta Air L...

Article Image

Delta Air Lines announces new round of changes on waivers, fares, and social distancing

There’s not a 12-Step program for airlines, but the largest carriers in the U.S. are starting to admit that they’re powerless when it comes to the devastation inflicted by COVID-19 and that doing business has become unmanageable. 

On Tuesday, several domestic airlines announced that they reached agreements with the Treasury Department for billions in government grant money to help offset the misfortune they’ve endured from the pandemic.

Then, on Wednesday, Delta Air Lines stepped up with yet another round of changes to both its system and passengers that will be extended through June 2020.

Policy changes

Waived changed fees: Delta is waiving change fees through May 31, 2022 to customers with canceled flights through June 2020.

There are two stipulations, however. Eligible customers include those who have:

  • Upcoming travel already booked in April, May or June 2020, as of April 14, 2020 

  • Existing eCredits or canceled travel from flights in March, April, May or June 2020

Capped fares: Delta has capped fares for travel throughout the U.S. and Canada through May 31 in all classes.

Social distancing during travel: Mirroring what the world is doing on the ground, Delta is making sure that when travelers are up in the air, they’ll encounter:

  • Fewer passengers per flight

  • Blocked middle seats

Modifying the boarding process where passengers will board by row from the rear of the plane forward

Free flights to medical volunteers traveling to hard-hit U.S. areas

As a compassionate gesture, Delta is also giving eligible medical volunteers free round-trip flights to Georgia, Louisiana, Michigan, and New York through the end of June.

The details, eligibility requirements, and reservations are being left up to those states and are good through the end of April 2020.

There’s not a 12-Step program for airlines, but the largest carriers in the U.S. are starting to admit that they’re powerless when it comes to the devastat...

Article Image

Airlines accept billions in coronavirus aid in a bid to keep workers afloat

Amid a plunge in demand for air travel, several airlines announced on Tuesday that they reached agreements with the Treasury Department for billions in government grants to help mitigate the impact of virus-prevention measures.

Measures to slow the spread of COVID-19 have included urging consumers to stay home, grounding planes, and asking employees to take voluntary unpaid leave. Airlines -- including American, Delta, United, Southwest, Spirit, JetBlue, Alaska -- applied to receive a cut of $25 billion in payroll grants established under the CARES Act in an effort to keep pilots, flight attendants, and other airline employees on payrolls through September.

In a statement, Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin announced that several carriers would be receiving federal assistance from the Payroll Support Program.

“We welcome the news that a number of major airlines intend to participate in the Payroll Support Program,” he said. “This is an important CARES Act program that will support American workers and help preserve the strategic importance of the airline industry while allowing for appropriate compensation to the taxpayers.” 

Airlines receiving aid

Officials from American Airlines said this week that the Treasury Department approved $5.8 billion in assistance. 

“By accepting these funds, we have happily agreed to not involuntarily furlough or reduce the hourly pay rates of our U.S.-based team members through Sept. 30, at which point we hope and expect that Americans are regularly flying again,” American’s CEO, Doug Parker, and the airline’s president, Robert Isom, wrote in a memo to employees.

Southwest said it expects to receive $3.2 billion under the program, more than $2.3 billion in payroll support, and a 10-year low-interest loan of nearly $1 billion. Delta said its deal with the Treasury Department will yield a $5.4 billion loan, which will include a 10-year, $1.6 billion, unsecured-loan. JetBlue said it will get $935.8 million. Of that figure, close to $251 million will come in the form of a loan.

“We welcome the news that a number of major airlines intend to participate in the Payroll Support Program,” the Treasury Department said in a statement. “This is an important CARES Act program that will support American workers and help preserve the strategic importance of the airline industry while allowing for appropriate compensation to the taxpayers.”

Sara Nelson, president of the Association of Flight Attendants, called the coronavirus relief deal “unprecedented.” 

“This is an unprecedented accomplishment—a truly workers-first stimulus that keeps people connected to their jobs and provides stability and hope to millions of aviation workers and sets a template we must now work to extend to every worker,” she said.

Mnuchin said the Department will work to “finalize the necessary agreements and disburse funds as quickly as possible.”

Amid a plunge in demand for air travel, several airlines announced on Tuesday that they reached agreements with the Treasury Department for billions in gov...

Article Image

FAA mounts investigation of Boeing 737 after 12-inch crack appears on the fuselage’s skin

The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has opened an investigation after an in-flight episode involving one of Southwest’s Boeing 737 jets.

As a result of a Las Vegas-Boise flight losing cabin pressure, the FAA’s inspection of the aircraft uncovered a 12-inch crack on the fuselage’s crown skin.

The area where the crack was located is subject to mandatory inspections every 1,500 flight cycles. A flight cycle is the operation of an engine from the time an aircraft leaves the ground until it touches the ground at the end of a flight. A report in the Wall Street Journal claims the FAA was investigating the likelihood of structural problems affecting other Boeing 737 jets. 

“The aircraft was taken out of service and is currently in maintenance receiving repairs,” Southwest said in a statement responding to the situation.

A repeat performance?

Boeing has been through an eerily similar situation before -- not only with its 737 but also with 757 model aircraft.

In 2010, the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) found that a factory error led to a crack in the fuselage skin of a Boeing 757, causing a sudden mid-flight decompression with 160 people aboard. 

In 2011, a similar situation on a Southwest flight involving a 737 led the NTSB to discover fatigue cracks “emanating from at least 42 of the 58 rivet holes connected by the fracture,” according to FlightSafety.org. That particular jet had close to 40,000 flight cycles at the time. After that incident, a Southwest Airlines investigation found that three other 737s also showed “crack indications.” 

As a result of those incidents, FlightSafety said Boeing called on the airlines to do a further inspection of fasteners in the crown skin area. The FAA followed that move by mandating an inspection.

The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has opened an investigation after an in-flight episode involving one of Southwest’s Boeing 737 jets.As a resu...

Article Image

Boeing 737 MAX faces another setback due to non-compliant wiring bundles

The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) added another chapter to Boeing’s sleeplessness in Seattle on Monday, telling the aviation company that the wiring bundles in its 737 MAX jets are “not compliant.”

However, according to CNBC, people familiar with the decision say Boeing claims that the bundles don’t pose a potential safety threat.

“The FAA continues to engage with Boeing as the company works to address a recently discovered wiring issue with the 737 Max,” a spokesman for the agency told CNBC. “The manufacturer must demonstrate compliance with all certification standards.”

How big of a concern is this?

The jury is out on whether the wiring bundles are actually an issue. Boeing contends that after 200 million hours of flight, if something was wrong with the wiring bundles, it would’ve reared its ugly head by now. Nonetheless, the FAA is concerned that there’s a possibility that the wiring bundles could short-circuit. If that happens, pilots could lose control of the plane.

For everyone’s benefit -- most importantly, the safety of the traveler -- the FAA is holding steady on when Boeing’s beleaguered jet will fly again. 

“The aircraft will be cleared for return to passenger service only after the FAA is satisfied that all safety-related issues are addressed…Regardless of the final determination on this matter our estimate for a mid-year return to service of the MAX is unchanged,” the FAA spokesman said.

The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) added another chapter to Boeing’s sleeplessness in Seattle on Monday, telling the aviation company that the wirin...

Article Image

Airlines called out for mediocre passenger experience at House committee hearing

At a House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure’s hearing about airline passenger experience on Tuesday -- the first hearing on consumer protections in nearly three years -- it became abundantly clear that airlines have their work cut out for them.

The hearing, entitled “The Airline Passenger Experience: What It Is and What It Could Be,” took its cues from the just-published Government Accountability Office (GAO) report that tracked gripes about airline companies and the Department of Transportation (DOT).

Consumer gripes

In a nutshell, the airline industry took a pretty good shellacking. Here’s what the Committee handed them:

A lack of assistance

The most frequent passenger gripe was the perceived failure of airline staff to provide assistance, seating accommodation concerns, and problems related to service animals.

Discrimination

Next in line were passenger grievances related to discrimination -- most commonly about racial discrimination. These types of grievances were up 20 percent in 2019. Committee Chair Rick Larsen (D-WA) made a point of singling out Spirit Airlines which made the news when seven African-Americans were kicked off one of its flights. 

Most people would think that racial discrimination of airline passengers would have faded out of sight by 2020. However, in ConsumerAffairs research on discrimination as it relates to airlines and travelers, it was interesting to find that the DOT “requires” airlines to provide training on accessibility issues but only “encourages” non-discrimination training for its staff. 

Fees

Another concern was the number of airline fees that are assessed on almost everything. What really chapped the Committee was the continued audacity of the airlines to keep raising fees on an almost annual basis. 

“It strikes me as odd that as carriers continue to increase their bag fees, passenger demand continues to grow,” fumed Peter DeFazio (D-OR). “Yet, airlines change their views on the law of supply and demand when it comes to increasing the passenger facility charge (PFC) -- the most effective funding tool our nation’s airports have to build and maintain their infrastructure. They argue that even a dollar increase would cause demand to plummet.”

Packed planes 

The airlines are enjoying a 15-year high in load factor, with average flights being 84.5 percent full. On top of that, travelers have to deal with smaller seats and less legroom, neither of which make for an enjoyable flight.

Mishandled bags

Despite improvements in this metric, the Committee still thinks that nearly 3 million mishandled bag reports is too high. 

The industry is doing its best to reverse this. As ConsumerAffairs found at CES 2020, airline leaders like Delta’s Ed Bastian are investing heavily in artificial intelligence technology that can vastly improve things like tracking bags.

Inflexibility

U.S. carriers made $2.7 billion on reservation changes and cancellations alone in 2018. 

“I’ve seen these fees as high as $200 each way, plus the difference in cost for the new flight; and if flying internationally, a passenger needing to switch dates might pay $750 or more,” DeFazio complained.

DeFazio also made it known that the airline industry’s inflexibility leaves passengers little or no reasonable recourse. 

“Most of a passenger’s rights are buried in U.S. airlines’ contracts of carriage. These treatises -- 40 pages on average -- ‘require a reading level of someone with a college graduate degree,’ according to the GAO,” he said.

Looking forward

At the beginning of the 116th Congress, Larsen set a forward-looking agenda in the Airline Passenger’s Bill of Rights which puts enhancing the air travel experience for U.S. passengers front and center.

That bill also has a dancing partner -- the FAA Reauthorization Act -- which includes several conditions designed to enhance the experience of airline passengers. Those include:

  • Establishing minimum seat pitch dimensions in commercial aircraft;

  • Establishing a DOT aviation consumer advocate, whose job would be helping resolve air travel grievances; and

  • Requiring carriers to improve transparency with the accommodations they offer passengers concerning the continuing issue of flight disruptions.

In summing up the day, Larsen noted that waiting three years between Congressional reviews and leaving the DOT and airlines to their own devices has to stop. 

“Congress, the DOT, and (the) industry must work to ensure transparency, prevent unfair and inequitable practices and promote reliable and accessible air service for all Americans,” he said.

At a House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure’s hearing about airline passenger experience on Tuesday -- the first hearing on consumer protecti...

Article Image

United Airlines increases fee for checked baggage

Following similar moves from other major carriers, United Airlines announced on Friday that it will be increasing the fee it assesses for checked bags by $5 starting on March 6. 

The company said that it would be raising the fee from $30 to $35 for travelers’ first checked bag; the fee for the second checked bag will now be $45. Travelers who bought a ticket before the announcement will not have to pay the additional fee. 

The price increase will be effective for all flights within the United States and short-range flights to areas in Latin America and the Caribbean.

Avoiding the price increase

While the price bump may catch the ire of travelers who have become frustrated with constantly increasing fees for airline services, there is a way to avoid price jump for now. 

Passengers who prepay for their bags online will not have to pay the extra $5. However, United notes on its websites that prepaying for checked baggage is non-refundable. Travelers will also need to make sure that their bags are not oversized, overweight, or categorized as a “special item” by the airline. 

For more information on United’s policy for checked bags, readers can visit the company’s website here.

Following similar moves from other major carriers, United Airlines announced on Friday that it will be increasing the fee it assesses for checked bags by $...

Article Image

Boeing discovers debris in 737 Max fuel tanks

You can chalk up another delay for Boeing getting its 737 Max aircraft back in the air. The company has discovered debris in several of its 737 Max jets’ fuel tanks. 

The debris -- formally referred to as “foreign object debris” (FOD) -- was found in jets that were being held in storage. That represents a huge problem because FOD can cause a plane to short circuit or experience a fire while in operation.

Absolutely unacceptable

CNN reported that Boeing fired off a memo to its employees, saying that FOD was “absolutely unacceptable. One escape is one too many. With your help and focus, we will eliminate FOD from our production system." 

"During these challenging times, our customers and the flying public are counting on us to do our best work each and every day. That's why we're taking action.”

Boeing said it will tackle the problem head-on by updating the aircraft’s instructions and checklist it uses before a plane is cleared to go. It’s doubling-down by also adding affirmations for when the aircraft are being inspected or audited.

A never-ending story

Boeing can’t win for losing. Now into a second year of fatal crashes, groundings, production stoppages, and continued misgivings about the 737 Max, it was only a few weeks ago that Boeing uncovered a possible wiring issue that could compromise control of the tail of the aircraft. If that happens, it could cause a short-circuit and lead to a crash if pilots don’t respond to the problem correctly and in time. 

The FAA says no 737 Max is taking off until it sees firsthand proof that the jet is completely ready to take to the skies again.

You can chalk up another delay for Boeing getting its 737 Max aircraft back in the air. The company has discovered debris in several of its 737 Max jets’ f...

Article Image

Delta Air Lines announces plans to go carbon neutral starting next month

When March 2020 rolls around, Delta Air Lines will be depositing a big, fat $1 billion towards doing what it can to clean up the environment. 

In a 10-year commitment heralded by Delta CEO Ed Bastian, the airline will put an all-in effort towards mitigating emissions -- both in the air and on the ground -- anywhere it has a presence. As part of that 10-year investment, Bastian is pinning his hopes on innovation, clean air tech, and waste reduction to honor that commitment.

“There is no substitute for the power that travel has to connect people, which our world needs today more than ever before. As we connect customers around the globe, it is our responsibility to deliver on our promise to bring people together and ensure the utmost care for our environment,” said Bastian. “The time is now to accelerate our investments and establish an ambitious commitment that the entire Delta team will deliver.”

With Delta becoming the first airline to go carbon neutral, it may force U.S. airports to follow Europe’s lead and also take the carbon neutral route. The number of Europe’s carbon neutral airports are growing expeditiously. Currently, Europe has 41 carbon neutral airports and is on track to hit 100 by 2030. 

Prepare for take-off

Bastian is a busy boy. When you take into account his earlier promise to build a technological conduit between Delta and its passengers, this latest initiative will put a lot on his plate.

With as much as 98 percent of all the company’s emissions coming from its aircraft, Bastian’s carbon neutral wish is an especially tall order, but he appears determined that Delta can -- and will -- make this move happen. To get there, however, it’s not only going to take everyone from the ground crew up. The airliner will need to build coalitions with outside brains and resources, as well. 

“There’s no challenge we face that is in greater need of innovation than environmental sustainability, and we know there is no single solution. We are digging deep into the issues, examining every corner of our business, engaging experts, building coalitions, fostering partnerships and driving innovation,” Bastian said. 

“We are on a journey, and though we don’t have all the answers today, we know that our scale, along with investments of time, talent and resources will bring meaningful impact to the planet and ensure the sustainability of our business for decades to come.”

How do travelers benefit?

A cleaner environment is one thing, but you may be asking yourself what’s in it for you the next time you climb aboard a Delta flight?

“When customers choose to fly Delta, they should feel they’re making a statement about taking care of our planet,” Bastian said. “Our commitment to carbon neutrality means flying with Delta represents far more than a great travel experience – it’s about joining arms to create a better world.

When March 2020 rolls around, Delta Air Lines will be depositing a big, fat $1 billion towards doing what it can to clean up the environment. In a 10-y...

Article Image

FAA’s chief upholds agency’s rationale for keeping 737 MAX grounded

We’re nearing the first anniversary of the U.S. government’s decision to ground all 737 MAX flights, and the top dog at the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Steve Dickson, says his agency isn’t going to clear the aircraft for service until it sees firsthand proof that the jet is completely ready to take to the skies again.

At a news briefing in London last week, Dickson reconfirmed that regulatory alignment would’ve been the preferable way to go -- but the FAA is taking its time to make sure it gets it right.

“If you ground an airplane arbitrarily – if you’re making any kind of safety decision arbitrarily – you really don’t know when you’ve got to a point where the situation has been improved,” Dickson said.

Contradicting what Ethiopian Minister of Transport said after an Ethiopian Airlines jet crashed, Dickson claims that the two accidents (Lion Air and Ethiopian Airlines) “had different factors associated with them – two airlines, two groups of pilots – so they weren’t the same scenario.” However, he agreed that there was a “common thread” of the Maneuvering Characteristics Augmentation System (MCAS)* in both situations, “but having the data from which to make those decisions certainly focuses your effort.” 

*The Maneuvering Characteristics Augmentation System (MCAS) flight control law was designed and certified for the 737 MAX to enhance the pitch stability of the airplane so that it feels and flies like other 737s, according to Boeing, manufacturer of the 737 MAX.

Getting Boeing and the FAA on the same page

Getting to the point where the FAA completely trusts Boeing’s efforts to keep the MAX safely up in the air is not an overnight thing, but both parties are trying to work together and progress is apparently being made.

“The FAA reviewed the most recent 737 MAX-related documents submitted by Boeing for the purpose of identifying any safety implications,” Dickson recently commented. “Our experts determined that nothing in the submission pointed to any safety risks that were not already identified as part of the ongoing review of proposed modifications to the aircraft.”

Nonetheless, both companies are dealing with flight simulators and not planes full of passengers flying in the skies, so both are being extra cautious.

“The FAA maintains a rigorous process for qualifying flight simulators. Upon reviewing the records for the specific simulator mentioned in the documents, the agency determined that piece of equipment has been evaluated and qualified three times in the last six months. Any potential safety deficiencies identified in the documents have been addressed,” is Dickson’s stance.

“While the tone and content of some of the language contained in the documents is disappointing, the FAA remains focused on following a thorough process for returning the Boeing 737 MAX to passenger service. We continue to work with other international aviation safety regulators to review the proposed changes to the aircraft. Our first priority is safety, and we have set no timeframe for when the work will be completed.”

We’re nearing the first anniversary of the U.S. government’s decision to ground all 737 MAX flights, and the top dog at the Federal Aviation Administration...

Article Image

Southwest to pay out $667 million in employee bonuses

Many airline carriers faced an up-and-down year in 2019. Boeing’s 737 MAX debacle caused logistical problems, and the recent coronavirus outbreak that began in December has forced many companies to alter their schedules.

But despite those pitfalls, airline employees working for Southwest will happily receive a well-earned profit-sharing bonus. The company announced on Thursday that it would be doling out $667 million to 60,000 employees who are eligible under the program. 

“Our Employees delivered outstanding results despite a challenging year, and it’s a pleasure to reward our People for all they contribute to our continued success,” said Southwest CEO Gary Kelly. “We recognize their resolve, persistence, resilience, and devotion to each other, our Customers, and our cause.”

In total, the bonus payments will reportedly equate to about 6 weeks of extra pay for employees who receive them. 

More headwinds in 2020

Despite the good news for employees, Southwest as a company is facing some more headwinds as we progress through 2020. 

A Department of Transportation report leaked at the end of January and expected to go public this month will allegedly hold the company accountable for unsafe practices. The Wall Street Journal claims that the report will also admonish the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) for not holding Southwest accountable.

In one instance, a Southwest jet’s wing tips were reportedly smashed when trying to make a landing in gale force winds. 

Many airline carriers faced an up-and-down year in 2019. Boeing’s 737 MAX debacle caused logistical problems, and the recent coronavirus outbreak that bega...

Article Image

United Airlines buys flight school to play bigger role in pilot training and recruitment

United Airlines announced on Wednesday that it has become the first airline carrier to own and operate its own flight school. The company hopes to use its new acquisition as a tool for helping it hire as many as 10,000 pilots by 2029. 

In a press release, company officials said they expect the new United Aviate Academy -- formerly known as the Westwind School of Aeronautics -- to churn out 300 graduates in its full first year of operation. They note that their acquisition will help give United more control over the recruitment, development, and training of pilots that will be added to its staff.

“We have developed the Aviate program in collaboration with the Air Line Pilots Association, International to have greater influence on the next generation of aviators at United,” said managing director of Aviate, Captain Bebe O’Neil. 

“Launching our own academy provides us with the unique opportunity to not only ensure we maintain the ideal number of quality candidates within our pilot pipeline, but also play a significant role in recruiting, developing and welcoming those with diverse backgrounds to the United family.”

Handling the finances

To help lure more pilots to its Aviate program, United stated that it would be working with financial institutions to help provide better terms for those interested in enrolling. The company said that would include “industry-tailored grace periods” and “competitive interest rates” for qualified individuals.

The carrier will also be launching its own scholarship program focusing on aspiring pilots who are women or from minority groups. 

The Aviate program, launched in 2019, was created to recruit and develop consumers who are interested in becoming career pilots. Those who are accepted into the program are automatically offered a program acceptance job offer with United. More details about the program can be found on the company’s website here.

United Airlines announced on Wednesday that it has become the first airline carrier to own and operate its own flight school. The company hopes to use its...

Article Image

Southwest Airlines’ commitment to safety reportedly questioned in government audit

The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), along with Southwest Airlines, is coming in for some Department of Transportation (DOT) criticism for how it handled safety, according to a report by The Wall Street Journal.

The Journal says it has reviewed a draft of the report scheduled to be released in early February. The draft report allegedly claims that the airline failed to prioritize safety and that the FAA failed to hold it accountable.

According to the draft, Southwest transported passengers on jets with unconfirmed maintenance records during a two year period. As an example, the report documents an incident in which a Southwest jet smashed the tips of both wings while repeatedly trying to land during gale force winds.

The Journal claims the report also calls the FAA’s oversight of the airline “lax, ineffective and inconsistent.” The report suggests Southwest was never subject to FAA enforcement actions in relation to safety issues, and it goes so far as to suggest the FAA’s stance toward Southwest served to “justify continued noncompliance with safety regulations.”

The Inspector General’s investigation reportedly found that the FAA allowed Southwest “to fly aircraft with unresolved safety concerns.” Further, the audit found that a majority of the FAA employees it interviewed about the matter “raised concerns about the culture at Southwest.”

Engine explosion

U.S.-based airlines have been remarkably safe during the last 20 years, largely due to better training, better equipment, and enhanced safety policies. 

Fatal accidents have been rare, but one of the most recent involved Southwest. The accident occurred when an engine exploded and pieces of metal broke a window. The passenger sitting next to the window was killed when the depressurization of the cabin sucked her halfway out of the aircraft.

The resulting investigation focused on the engine’s metal fatigue, and Southwest announced an acceleration of its program to inspect CFM56-7B engines used on its Boeing 737 aircraft.

The Journal report says that an 18-month government investigation concluded that the FAA management in the Dallas office, where Southwest is based, allowed the airline to fly planes “with unresolved safety concerns.”

Government officials have declined to comment, but Southwest, which has reportedly reviewed the draft, took issue with its findings. A spokeswoman told The Journal that the company strongly disagrees with “unsubstantiated references to Southwest’s safety culture.”

The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), along with Southwest Airlines, is coming in for some Department of Transportation (DOT) criticism for how it han...

Article Image

Boeing predicts its 737 Max-related financial hit will eclipse $18 billion

Boeing’s bean counters have run the numbers on the impact of the 737 Max’s grounding on the company’s bottom line and the results are a pool of red ink -- at least $18 billion worth.

The aircraft manufacturer’s estimated loss came Wednesday in Boeing’s quarterly earnings report where company brass confessed that Boeing has a deep hole to crawl out of.

"We recognize we have a lot of work to do," said Boeing President and Chief Executive Officer David Calhoun. "We are focused on returning the 737 MAX to service safely and restoring the long-standing trust that the Boeing brand represents with the flying public. We are committed to transparency and excellence in everything we do.  Safety will underwrite every decision, every action and every step we take as we move forward. Fortunately, the strength of our overall Boeing portfolio of businesses provides the financial liquidity to follow a thorough and disciplined recovery process."

Out of that $18 billion, more than a fourth is connected to shutting down and then reopening its factory doors if and when the Max goes back into production. Boeing went to banks hat-in-hand only last week, asking for a $20 billion loan to try to offset that loss.

One thing leads to another

The domino effect of the 737 Max runs deep. Overall, Boeing’s commercial airplane production is down 53 percent over a year ago, and it has shelled out $8 billion in compensation and price cuts to airlines affected by Max-related issues.

Getting airlines to trust Boeing again is not going to be easy. Rather than push its luck, Southwest has already cancelled Max-flown flights until June 2020. Airline employees counting on overtime and Max-related assignments also took a hit.

American’s boss weighs in on passenger confidence

Travelers’ trust of Boeing-built aircraft is another thing for the company to overcome. Passenger confidence about climbing aboard a 737 Max when it returns to service is “not good” -- at least not for the moment, according to the head of American Airlines. 

Doug Parker, the CEO at American -- which has a commitment for 100 Max jets -- has told his employees that travellers will trust the plane only when “the best pilots in the world who don’t take airplanes up until they know everything about them, they’re comfortable doing it.”

“Polled today, which a lot of companies are doing including ours, asking people ‘how do you feel about the MAX?’ The results are not good,” Parker said during an employee town hall. “There’s very high awareness of the issue. And there’s real trepidation about whether they would fly it today or not. So that’s clearly a concern.”

“I’ll offer just this. One, all of those polls are being taken today. By the time it actually flies a lot more will happen. Of which I believe will make an enormous difference in that customer sentiment. But the real thing that’ll make a difference…American Airlines pilots get in the cockpit and say “I am comfortable flying this aircraft. That’s what matters,” Parker said.

Boeing’s bean counters have run the numbers on the impact of the 737 Max’s grounding on the company’s bottom line and the results are a pool of red ink --...

Article Image

Commercial air travel has never been safer, study finds

A new study says that commercial air travel has never been safer, and that trend should hold for the foreseeable future.

The study, which was conducted by MIT professor Arnold Barnett, looked at flight data from 2008-2017. It shows that the risk of death per boarding during that period fell by more than half compared with the previous decade. 

When all the numbers shake out, that rate is one death per 7.9 million passenger boardings, globally. That’s compared to one death per 2.7 million boardings during the period between 1998 and 2007, and one death per 1.3 million boardings from 1988-1997.

"The worldwide risk of being killed had been dropping by a factor of two every decade," concluded Arnold. "Not only has that continued in the last decade, the [latest] improvement is closer to a factor of three. The pace of improvement has not slackened at all even as flying has gotten ever safer and further gains become harder to achieve. That is really quite impressive and is important for people to bear in mind."

Good news, bad news

As with most studies, there’s upsides and downsides. 

Two important developments came out of a) China, which Barnett says has made “exceptionally strong safety achievements” and is on course to become the world’s largest aviation nation within the next five years, and; b) the Eastern European members of the European Union, which had a fatality-free record in the last decade. Other low-risk countries are the United States, Canada, and Israel -- as well as New Zealand and Australia, countries that historically do well in safety reviews.

Barnett found that less developed countries -- mostly Asian, African, and Latin American countries --  had room for improvement, with many of them failing to make any serious headway in passenger safety. All told, the death risk in those countries from 2008-2017 was one per 1.2 million passenger boardings -- an improvement from one death per 400,000 passenger boardings during 1998-2007. 

"The risk now in the higher-risk countries is basically the risk we used to have 40-50 years ago" in the safest air-travel countries, Barnett noted.

Looking forward

While Barnett’s study didn’t include the Boeing 737 Max fatalities -- which turned many a passenger into a nervous ninny -- he says that the rate of fatalities has generally declined far faster than public fears about flying. 

"Flying has gotten safer and safer," Barnett says. "It's a factor of 10 safer than it was 40 years ago. The risk is so low that being afraid to fly is a little like being afraid to go into the supermarket because the ceiling might collapse.”

A new study says that commercial air travel has never been safer, and that trend should hold for the foreseeable future.The study, which was conducted...

Article Image

Budget airlines are raking it in thanks to low-cost fares

Budget airlines are enjoying some tailwind these days. A new report verifies that U.S.-based low-cost carriers (LCC) chalked up 246 million seats sold in 2018, far and away more than any other country.

GlobalData’s latest report, ‘Global Low Cost Airlines Market to 2023’, found that out of the 59 different airlines in the U.S., it’s the growth of the LCC’s that’s held steady over the last few years. The researchers say that is the way things should stay until at least 2023.

Deal or no deal

The key factor? Price. Delta, American, and United have all felt the pinch of Spirit, JetBlue, and Allegiant -- airlines with average fares of $113, $175, and $67, respectively. One little caveat about that Spirit fare: it’s a stripped-down, “unbundled” fare, which means travelers have to pay extra for anything other than a seat. Spirit’s fare strategy appears to be working its magic. Passengers are dropping an extra $50.94 in ancillary revenue on top of the average $67 fare.

"Affordability factors are the most important within the consumer booking process according to GlobalData’s global consumer survey and is likely to continue to be at the forefront of a traveler’s decision over the next few years,” Johanna Bonhill-Smith, Travel & Tourism Analyst at GlobalData told ConsumerAffairs.

“Followed by the birth of the more independent traveler that is heavily invested in experiences over services, the growth of LCC’s will aid the growth of younger generational travel saving costs on flights and potentially spending more on memorable activities when in a destination. "

Get ready for “ultra” savings

Bonhill-Smith says U.S. travelers are about to see a new level of fares coming into play in 2020 -- the “ultra-low-cost carrier (ULCC).” 

JetBlue’s founder, David Neeleman, is first out of that ULCC gate with “MOXY” -- an interesting partnership with Marriott that pitches a high-tech experience on all-new Airbus jets, markets the big carriers don’t cater to, and an ultra-low-cost fare designed to offer a level of customer service the Delta, American, and United only offer in first class.

“JetBlue currently holds the fifth largest airline market share within the US in 2018 and the introduction of brands such as this may be sure to both rattle the industry for full service carriers (FSC) and contribute to the growth of the LCC operator,” Bonhill-Smith said.

Budget airlines are enjoying some tailwind these days. A new report verifies that U.S.-based low-cost carriers (LCC) chalked up 246 million seats sold in 2...

Article Image

Changes to service animal policies could be on the way

The U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) is considering changes to its Air Carrier Access Act (ACAA), which regulates service animals on flights.

Over the past two years, Delta Airlines, American Airlines, and others have made sweeping changes to their service animal policies to accommodate travelers and establish some guidelines for what is and isn’t acceptable.

However, there were several incidents in which airline employees were bitten. A number of fliers have also tried to push the limits by insisting their pets were necessary, but they were unable to prove that. 

United Airlines, for example, tried to shore up the gray areas by mandating that passengers have to provide a letter from a licensed medical/mental health professional, a veterinary health form documenting the health and vaccination records for the animal, as well as confirming that the animal has been trained to behave properly in a public setting. That’s a lot of paperwork for anyone to fill out.

“Today’s Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) is intended to ensure a safe and accessible air transportation system,” the DOT wrote. “It addresses concerns raised by individuals with disabilities, airlines, flight attendants, airports, other aviation transportation stakeholders, and other members of the public, regarding service animals on aircraft.” 

What’s being proposed

Here are the specifics the DOT is considering: 

  • Modify the definition of a “service animal” to read “a dog that is individually trained to do work or perform tasks for the benefit of a person with a disability;”

  • Separate what is considered to be an “emotional support animal” and what is considered to be a “service animal;”

  • Review whether a psychiatric service animal qualifies as a service animal and, if so, require the same training and treatment of psychiatric service animals as other service animals;

  • Permit airlines to require forms developed by DOT that verify a a service animal’s good behavior, health, and in cases of long flights, whether the service animal has the ability to either not relieve itself or can relieve itself in a sanitary manner;

  • Permit airlines to require passengers with a disability who are traveling with a service animal the opportunity to check in at the airport an hour prior to the departure time. The DOT’s reasoning here is that it doesn’t clog up the check-in process for the general public and it also gives the airline time to observe and further evaluate the animal; 

  • Grant airlines the permission to limit the number of service animals accompanying a single passenger with a disability to two;

  • Empower airlines to require a service animal to fit within its handler’s foot space on the aircraft;

  • Continue to allow airlines to require that service animals be under the control of its handler, whether harnessed, leashed, or tethered;

  • Allow airlines to refuse transportation to any service animal that shows aggressive behavior and, therefore, potentially poses a direct threat to the health or safety of others; and

  • Continue to prohibit airlines from refusing to transport a service animal solely on the basis of breed. For example, Delta forbids pit bull type dogs.

For the good of all

The DOT senses that there might be some blowback on these changes, but it thinks too many travelers are trying to work the current system in their favor.

“The Department recognizes the integral role that service animals play in the lives of many individuals with disabilities and wants to ensure that individuals with disabilities can continue using their service animals while also reducing the likelihood that passengers wishing to travel with their pets on aircraft will be able to falsely claim their pets are service animals,” the agency said.

The American Kennel Club and Assistance Dogs International are on board with these changes, too. “We recognize the wonderful service that all dogs can provide to comfort their owners, however we support the ADA definition of service dogs,”  American Kennel Club’s Vice President of Government Relations Sheila Goffe told ConsumerAffairs.

“[We believe] these proposed rules represent a real step forward for assuring the safety of both the traveling public and individuals with disabilities who rely on service dogs to perform tasks that enable them to carry out their daily activities.”

“This is a major step forward for airline accessibility for those with disabilities that travel with Service Dogs that are necessary for their wellbeing,” added Sheila O’Brien, President of Assistance Dogs International, North America, in a statement to ConsumerAffairs.

“By aligning the definition of Service Animals with that of the American’s with Disabilities Act, the 17,504  actively working Assistance Dogs International teams in North America, will be able to travel safely to their destinations.”

Comments on the NPRM must be received within 60 days of the date the notice is published.  The NPRM can be found at regulations.gov, docket number DOT-OST-2018-0068.

The U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) is considering changes to its Air Carrier Access Act (ACAA), which regulates service animals on flights.Ove...

Article Image

Boeing asks lenders for $10 billion to help offset losses from 737 MAX incidents

Boeing has not only taken a public relations hit from its involvement in the fatal crashes of its 737 MAX aircraft; it has also taken a financial hit.

Anticipating that the near-$10 billion ding its bottom line took will grow even larger when its fourth quarter 2019 financials are released, the aircraft manufacturer is reportedly talking to banks about borrowing enough to offset the sting of that loss. The company has already secured a little more than half of that $10 billion. 

Where everything stands

Boeing halted production of the 737 MAX in December. If the company ever gets the all-clear from regulators that the plane is safe, it will have to find a way to unload hundreds of aircraft it has in storage. 

Despite the existing orders Boeing has for those planes, most -- if not all -- airlines sense that there are few travelers who are willing to fly on one, no matter how safe and secure the company says the planes are.

“We have previously stated that we would continually evaluate our production plans should the MAX grounding continue longer than we expected,” Boeing wrote at the time of that decision.

“As we have throughout the 737 MAX grounding, we will keep our customers, employees, and supply chain top of mind as we continue to assess appropriate actions. This will include efforts to sustain the gains in production system and supply chain quality and health made over the last many months.”

In other words, hang tight, world. This story has a long way to go before it’s ever finished.

Boeing has not only taken a public relations hit from its involvement in the fatal crashes of its 737 MAX aircraft; it has also taken a financial hit.A...

Article Image

Southwest cancels all Boeing MAX 737 flights through June

Boeing’s 737 MAX planes have received plenty of press lately for additional safety issues and revelations that its employees thought the plane was unsafe. So, it’s only natural that airline companies would respond by creating some more distance.

That’s what Southwest Airlines did on Thursday. The carrier announced that it would be extending the removal of MAX flights from its schedule to June 6. It previously said it would ground these flights through April.

“Based on continued uncertainty around the timing of MAX return to service, as well as Boeing's recommendation for Pilot simulator training, the Company is proactively removing the MAX from its flight schedule through June 6, 2020,” Southwest said in a press release.

Doing it for travelers

In its announcement, Southwest said that it decided to remove the MAX flights to remove the possibility that it might need to take them away later at the last minute. By acting now, the airline says that it hopes to let its customers make appropriate travel plans.

“We offer our apologies to our Customers impacted by this change, and we thank them for their continued patience,” Southwest said.

In total, the extension of the MAX cancellations will take away around 330 weekday flights. However, the company notes that it will still offer over 4,000 daily flights during the peak flying season. Moving forward, Southwest says it will continue to monitor the FAA’s approval process for the 737 MAX so that it can reinstate those planes quickly when the time comes.

“We remain confident that, once certified by the FAA, the enhancements will support the safe operation of the MAX,” the company stated.

Boeing’s 737 MAX planes have received plenty of press lately for additional safety issues and revelations that its employees thought the plane was unsafe....

Article Image

Delta soars while American falls in another ranking of the best and worst airlines

When ConsumerAffairs recently flew to Las Vegas for CES 2020, we were hopeful that the promises the airlines had been making were going to be in full view. Not so much…

The customer service on American Airlines (AA) was rather pedestrian, and the onboard snacks were less-than-snack’ish (but, thank you, AA, for the otherwise pricey sandwiches for free after we journeyed to what seemed like the last departure gate on earth). Yep, it’s winter, which caused delays and extended arrival times as much as six hours. But, it appears our experience isn’t a one-time thing.

From worst...

In the Wall Street Journal’s (WSJ) Best and Worst Airlines of 2019, Scott McCartney, WSJ’s Middle Seat columnist, puts American at the bottom of the rankings, which makes the airline a basement dweller going on three times in the last five years. 

But in all fairness, American probably has the right to cry foul since it went through not only the 737 MAX issue but a push-come-to-shove contract dispute with its mechanics. That six-month long dispute only made matters worse when the domino effect of an average of 50 planes out of service, cancellations and delays, and stranded travelers started tumbling.

“We would not take our passengers and team members through it again,” David Seymour, senior vice president of operations at American, said. Fingers crossed, David.

...to first

What airline did McCartney think deserved first place? He gives it to Delta, as he has now for three years running.

McCartney noted that despite the weather and congestion, Delta raised its on-time arrival rate to 83.4 percent, up from 82.9 percent in 2018. That put Delta ahead of oft-awarded Alaska Airlines in the on-time category and 10 points ahead of last place finisher Frontier, a carrier that ConsumerAffairs reviewers consider more average than bad. It’s encouraging to read that Delta doesn’t use weather as an excuse where its peers might. 

“While the weather itself is out of our control, how we react to that weather, plan for that weather and work through that weather is certainly within our control,” Dave Holtz, Delta’s senior vice president over the airline’s operations center, told the WSJ.

Delta showed improvement in other areas, too, like cancellation rate. According to McCartney’s stats, Delta canceled just 0.7 percent of its flights in 2019 versus the industry average of 1.85 percent, down from 0.9 percent the previous year. On the flipside, Southwest, American and United all had cancellation rates higher than the average.

The Atlanta-based airline appears to be committed to staying ahead of the pack. Its CEO reaffirmed that commitment only last week at CES 2020.

Where’s Hawaiian?

When ConsumerAffairs saw McCartney’s picks, the first thing that came to mind was where the heck was Hawaiian Airlines given all the high marks other rankers have given it in regards to flight delays, safety, and overall satisfaction.

“If included, Hawaiian would be No. 1,” McCartney said, “But Hawaiian has a big chunk of its business in short hops between islands where the weather is, well, paradise. Such limited exposure to the mainland distorts comparisons. Hawaiian argues it should be included because it faces maintenance issues, baggage handling, crew scheduling and other aspects just like any other airline.”

When ConsumerAffairs recently flew to Las Vegas for CES 2020, we were hopeful that the promises the airlines had been making were going to be in full view....

Article Image

FAA seeks to fine Southwest for improper weight and balance data

The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has proposed a $3.92 million fine against Southwest Airlines over what it says were incorrect calculations when it came to weight and balance sata. 

The agency alleges that Southwest used this incorrect data while operating flights between May 1, 2018 and August 9, 2018. The time period covered a total of 21,505 flights by 44 aircraft. 

Regulators note that weight-related data is often used by airlines to determine how many passengers and how much fuel can be safely carried. It also determines where cargo should be stored on airplanes. Having incorrect information could cause instability during flight, which increases risks for passengers.

The FAA says that Southwest has 30 days to respond to its enforcement letter. For more information on the airline, and to read consumer reviews, visit ConsumerAffairs’ site here.

The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has proposed a $3.92 million fine against Southwest Airlines over what it says were incorrect calculations when i...

Article Image

Boeing employees believed early on that the 737 MAX was primed for disaster

Since two fatal crashes involving its 737 MAX jets occurred in late 2018 and early 2019, things have been going downhill for Boeing. The company has had its planes grounded, and the timeline for getting them back in the air continues to stretch out. 

But as regulators continue to delve into the details of the planes and their shortcomings, a new set of internal documents sent to Congress by Boeing on Thursday show that many company employees had little faith in the 737 MAX’s ability to fly safely in the first place.

Many of the messages within the documents were sent between Boeing employees, and they show that there were lingering doubts about whether the planes deserved to be certified for commercial use. 

“Would you put your family on a MAX simulator trained aircraft? I wouldn’t,” one employee said to another in a 2018 exchange. “No,” the other employee replied.

Designed by clowns

Other messages contained in the documents are much more troubling. In many instances, sentiments shared between employees were much more harsh than a simple rhetorical question. 

One employee described the 737 MAX as being “designed by clowns, who in turn are supervised by monkeys.” Perhaps even more worrying were messages sent by other company officials about making sure that simulator training for the aircraft was not required. 

“I want to stress the importance of holding firm that there will not be any type of simulator training required to transition. Boeing will not allow that to happen. We’ll go face to face with any regulator who tries to make that a requirement,” the company official said.

Currently, Boeing has stopped production of the 737 MAX until regulators at the FAA deem that it is safe to return to the air. Regarding the internal documents, Boeing stated that the exchanges between its employees are not reflective of the company’s stance as a whole.

“We regret the content of these communications, and apologize to the FAA, Congress, our airline customers, and to the flying public for them. We have made significant changes as a company to enhance our safety processes, organizations, and culture,” the company said. 

Since two fatal crashes involving its 737 MAX jets occurred in late 2018 and early 2019, things have been going downhill for Boeing. The company has had it...

Article Image

Delta Airlines chief makes a new, tech-oriented commitment to its customers

Delta Airlines Chief Executive Ed Bastian took the stage at the Consumer Electronics Show (CES) on Tuesday to reaffirm that Delta senses technology is an extremely important conduit between consumers and the airline.

In the new world where more and more companies are keeping in touch with consumers via tech, Delta became the first airline to keynote CES. Airlines don’t typically show up at confabs like an electronics show because they might still be thinking that a free beverage, a baby-sized snack, a skimpy blanket, and a less-than-comfy pillow is all the traveler really needs to be happy. Au contraire, mon frère.

Walk the walk, talk the talk

Bastian’s blueprint for the future of travel as it relates to tech pretty much falls in line with what ConsumerAffairs uncovered in the CES session on Smart Tourism -- that, done correctly, technology can redefine consumer expectations.

“We see technology as a tool to further our mission of connecting people and creating opportunities,” he said. “We’re not chasing shiny objects or tech for the sake of being cool. We are dedicated to solving your travel problems and making your voyages – and your lives – easier.”

Seamless integration

It’s not likely that Bastian wrote the talking points for all the industry pundits in CES’ Smart Tourism, but they’re definitely on the same page when it comes to making travel more relaxing and less stressful. By anticipating a traveler’s needs and offering services that can take the stress out of travel, Bastian hopes that amenities like a ride to the airport and app-based support can help customers move forward on their trip seamlessly. 

The specifics of Bastian’s game plan is pretty progressive compared to the dated and pay-for-everything attitude we’ve seen from much of the airline industry. He went on record as saying that he wants to digitize the flying experience with everything from machine learning and robotics in improving employee production to free Wi-Fi. He also mentioned a single-button approach that could allow travelers to binge watch TV shows so they can feel more like they’re at home. 

A likely story

Yes, you’ve heard airline brass make the oath of making the flying experience better before. Only last year, Oscar Munoz, the former CEO at United Airlines, said his airline was turning a leaf and taking a pro-consumer stance. With the recent reviews United has been given by ConsumerAffairs readers, Munoz’ promise may have come to fruition. But, overall, U.S.-based carriers simply don’t fare as well in the satisfaction department as their international counterparts. 

As an example, some international carriers -- like Virgin Atlantic -- have gone the extra mile to make flights comfortable. One consumer --  “C.” of Laguna Woods, California, who has celiac disease -- wrote in a review of their Virgin Atlantic experience that they were “thrilled by the way my needs were accommodated. I also liked the areas where one could stand during a long flight.” 

Delta appears committed

If Bastian has his wish, Delta will start showing up at the top of airline best-ofs just like Virgin. Still, at the end of the day, whatever an airline promises has to pay off on the bottom line. 

It’s anyone’s guess as to how long Delta’s “technology is there to serve our customers” refrain will last internally and externally or grow its bottom line. Until one of those benchmarks happens, Bastian says the company is committed to the “Delta Difference” and focused on building whatever tools it takes and whatever consumer trust is needed to take the airline to new heights.

“The opportunities to better connect people across the world are truly endless,” he said. “Technology will help us do it even better.”

Delta Airlines Chief Executive Ed Bastian took the stage at the Consumer Electronics Show (CES) on Tuesday to reaffirm that Delta senses technology is an e...

Article Image

Boeing hit with another concern on its 737 Max aircraft

We’re only days into the new year, but Boeing’s already wishing 2020 would go away.

While the aircraft manufacturer thought it was finally out of the woods with all the problems it’s faced with its 737 Max, new issues with the jet have been raised.

Before the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) would allow Boeing to put the Max back in the air, it asked the company to conduct a tooth-and-comb audit to make sure that it had sufficiently gone over the finer details of how long it could take a pilot behind the wheel of a Max to respond to emergencies, according to a senior engineer at Boeing as well as other people familiar with the situation.

Uncovered in Boeing’s latest inspection was a possible issue with the wiring that helps control the tail of the aircraft -- one that could cause a short-circuit and lead to a crash if pilots didn’t respond to the problem correctly and in time. 

The determining factor here is whether the scenario is likely and, if it is, what Boeing would have to do to keep it from happening in real life. If all it has to do is separate the wires, Boeing says that’s a relatively easy task, and it appeared ready to do that on all the hundreds of 737 Max already built.

Boeing can’t afford to get it wrong… again

Since 346 people died in 737 Max crashes, Boeing has bled money profusely -- to the tune of billions per day. Any further detours would certainly add more financial misery, not to mention loss of consumer trust and raised eyebrows at the FAA.

“There are the human elements,” Peter Morris, chief economist at aviation consultancy Ascend/FlightGlobal, told the BBC. “The pilots and crew understand far more of the deep technical issues and will be understandably vociferous about the absolute integrity of the revised hardware, software and procedures. In the light of the evidence to date, they are likely to be very critical and need significant reassurance and explanation.”

“While many passengers probably do not recognise their aircraft type, events like this inevitably get people talking. Any further incidents, even if slightly related to these issues, would be utterly disastrous for public opinion and really shake trust in aviation safety.”

We’re only days into the new year, but Boeing’s already wishing 2020 would go away.While the aircraft manufacturer thought it was finally out of the wo...

Article Image

American Airlines will share Boeing 737 MAX compensation with employees

American Airlines is one of three domestic carriers adversely affected by the grounding of the Boeing 737 MAX aircraft. It will likely be compensated by Boeing, and the airline this week served notice that it would share that compensation with its employees.

American, along with Southwest and United, have lost money because they had to cancel and consolidate flights that used the 737 MAX. The aircraft has been grounded since March after a second fatal crash in five months.

While the grounding has been costly for the airlines, employees have also suffered financial loss. As the airlines have canceled flights, it has meant less overtime for employees and less opportunity for growth.

American hasn’t yet specified how it will share its expected compensation from Boeing with its employees because it doesn’t yet know how much it will receive. Southwest, Turkish Airlines, and Icelandic Airlines have reached agreements with Boeing, but negotiations with American are ongoing.

“As we’ve said before, we expect American will be compensated for the lost earnings that the Max grounding has caused,” American Airlines spokesman Ross Feinstein told CNBC. “We anticipate that part of any compensation American receives will be eligible for profit sharing for our team.”

737 MAX remains grounded

In late 2019, American estimated the grounding of the aircraft would result in losses of $540 million in pretax income for the year. The losses could go much higher since there is no clear indication of when the planes will return to service. American and Southwest have removed the 737 MAX from all schedules through April, and United has canceled MAX flights through June.

American is following the example of Southwest Airlines, which reached an agreement on compensation with Boeing last month and announced it would share $125 million of that with its employees.

Meanwhile, there is no concrete timetable for returning the 737 MAX to the air. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has pointedly said that it will determine that date with little to no input from Boeing. The agency is requiring the manufacturer to complete an audit of the software updates it has made and test the revised system in flight simulators with a number of different pilots.

After that, pilots for airlines flying the Boeing 737 MAX must undergo a new round of flight training. 

American Airlines is one of three domestic carriers adversely affected by the grounding of the Boeing 737 MAX aircraft. It will likely be compensated by Bo...

Article Image

Qantas takes home the trophy as 2020’s safest airline

What’s the safest airline to fly? Once again, it’s Qantas, according to AirlineRatings.com, an airline safety and product rating website.

In its Top Twenty Safest Airlines 2020, AirlineRatings used data from more than 400 different airlines it monitors and focused entirely on the operational aspects of each one, not how comfortable its seats are or what kind of snacks it hands out.

In framing how the list was determined, AirlineRatings.com Editor-in-Chief Geoffrey Thomas emphasized that each airline was a “standout” when it comes to safety, innovation, and launching of new aircraft. 

“For instance, Australia’s Qantas has been recognized by the British Advertising Standards Association in a test case as the world’s most experienced airline,” Thomas said.

The Top 20 Safest Airlines 2020

In pecking order, here’s how AirlineRatings Top 20 shakes out:

  1. Qantas

  2. Air New Zealand

  3. EVA Air

  4. Etihad

  5. Qatar Airways

  6. Singapore Airlines

  7. Emirates

  8. Alaska Airlines

  9. Cathay Pacific Airways

  10. Virgin Australia

  11. Hawaiian Airlines

  12. Virgin Atlantic Airlines

  13. TAP Portugal

  14. SAS

  15. Royal Jordanian

  16. Swiss

  17. Finnair

  18. Lufthansa

  19. Aer Lingus

  20. KLM

Cheers and jeers both for Qantas

If you’re in charge of managing the safety of passengers on long routes like Qantas flies, you’d better have your act together.

“Qantas has been the lead airline in virtually every major operational safety advancement over the past 60 years and has not had a fatality in the jet era,” Thomas added. “But Qantas is not alone. Long established airlines such as Hawaiian and Finnair have perfect records in the jet era.”

While Qantas takes home the trophy for safety, there are some travelers who just aren’t fans of how they’re treated on the service end.

In reviews on ConsumerAffairs, the complaints range from delays to rudeness and even response time. One consumer complained about an issue they perceived with Qantas’ follow-through on reserve seating.

“Do Not Fly Qantas Airlines. They are a scam promising to reserve preferred seating,” David of Maple Ridge, British Columbia complained. “I paid a lot of money 11 months ahead of time for preferred seating and day of flight. They assigned me to worst seats on plane. Said sorry it happens, and refunded me the difference. No amicable agreed solution.”

What’s the safest airline to fly? Once again, it’s Qantas, according to AirlineRatings.com, an airline safety and product rating website.In its Top Twe...

Article Image

DOT report allegedly calls for more FAA oversight of Allegiant Air

The Transportation Department reportedly wants the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to increase oversight of discount airline Allegiant Air, citing a number of in-flight engine shutdowns and other maintenance issues.

Reuters reports it has obtained a copy of the Transportation Department Inspector General’s (IG) 31-page report detailing the investigation’s findings. The report was sent to Congress and has not been made public.

A spokesman for Allegiant Air said the company has not seen the report and would not comment until officials there had an opportunity to review it.

According to Reuters, the investigation began in May 2018, prompted by what the IG’s report termed a “series of in-flight engine shutdowns, aborted takeoffs, and unscheduled landings.” The report said the incidents all occurred on the airline’s MD-80 fleet, which was recently retired. Allegiant replaced the planes with Airbus jets.

Allegiant Air was founded in 1997 and is currently the nation’s ninth-largest carrier. The company is based in suburban Las Vegas and flies a number of popular routes. It also serves secondary airports and is best known for its ultra-low fares.

Readers mention maintenance issues

Allegiant rates 2.5 stars from people posting reviews at ConsumerAffairs. No one mentioned in-flight incidents like those described in the report, but several mentioned that there seemed to be a lot of delays related to maintenance issues. Some like Tracy, of Denair, Calif., appeared to be concerned.

“What are the chances of three times in a row, in a two month period, there are hours of delay for maintenance problems,” Tracy wrote in her ConsumerAffairs post. “I am deeply concerned about the safety of this airline.”

2016 FAA audit

In 2016, Allegiant announced that the FAA audit of its operations had turned up several "minor" issues. The findings were "minor with non-regulatory issues observed, or with non-systemic regulatory issues observed,” the airline said at the time.

The FAA said its audit discovered "several element design" and "element performance deficiencies." The audit, called a Certificate Holder Evaluation Process, is conducted regularly for all commercial carriers.

Reuters says the IG’s report found that engine shutdowns on the now-discontinued MD-80 aircraft occurred at least 21 times between 2014 and 2018, forcing the planes to make unscheduled landings. The report also faulted regulators for allegedly not adequately tracking the risks from a mid-air engine shutdown.

The Transportation Department reportedly wants the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to increase oversight of discount airline Allegiant Air, citing a...

Article Image

Boeing halts 737 MAX production until grounding is lifted

Boeing has announced it will stop work on 737 MAX aircraft currently in production while it awaits action by regulators who will decide when the grounded plane can fly again.

While sources reported over the weekend that the company might have to adjust production schedules, the announcement appeared to come as a surprise to the financial markets, with CNBC terming it “drastic.”

“Throughout the grounding of the 737 MAX, Boeing has continued to build new airplanes and there are now approximately 400 airplanes in storage,” the company said in a late Monday statement. “We have previously stated that we would continually evaluate our production plans should the MAX grounding continue longer than we expected. As a result of this ongoing evaluation, we have decided to prioritize the delivery of stored aircraft and temporarily suspend production on the 737 program beginning next month.”

The three U.S. airlines that fly the 737 MAX -- Southwest, American, and United -- have consolidated flights and employed other aircraft to make up for the loss of 737 MAX equipment.

The 737 MAX had been one of the aircraft company’s most successful planes, valued for its fuel efficiency and state-of-the-art engineering. But a crash of a Ryan Air 737 MAX in October 2018 and the loss of an Ethiopian Airlines 737 MAX five months later resulted in the worldwide grounding of the jet.

What began as a reconfiguration of software turned into a major reexamination of the plane’s overall safety. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), under fire for the process of certifying the plane in the first place, appears to be in no hurry to return it to the air.

No layoffs

In announcing the temporary shutdown of the 737 MAX production line, Boeing officials stressed that no employees would be laid off or furloughed. The company said they would either continue 737-related work or would be reassigned to other teams.

“We believe this decision is least disruptive to maintaining long-term production system and supply chain health,” the company said.

Boeing said the decision was influenced by several factors, including the reality that recertification of the aircraft will extend into 2020. 

Boeing has announced it will stop work on 737 MAX aircraft currently in production while it awaits action by regulators who will decide when the grounded p...

Article Image

Boeing may cut production of 737 Max aircraft as ban drags on

Things don’t appear to be getting any better for Boeing and its beleaguered 737 Max aircraft. Following an extended grounding period and an FAA report which indicated that these jets were more prone to crashes, the company may have to cut back on production.

CNN cites sources familiar with the matter as saying that a decision to curb or suspend production could come as soon as Monday after U.S. markets close. In a statement to the news outlet, company officials said that they will continue to work with regulators in the U.S. and around the world to bring the 737 Max back into service. 

“We will continue to assess production decisions based on the timing and conditions of return to service, which will be based on regulatory approvals and may vary by jurisdiction,” the company noted.

Planes to remain grounded

While regulatory approval would certainly be a step in the right direction for Boeing, it might be some time before consumers see 737 Max planes back in the air. 

Even if the company were to get the regulatory green light from the FAA by early 2020, professional pilots would still need to be retrained on the aircraft’s new systems -- a process that could take months to complete. Airline companies would also need to be content with activating the jets within their fleets, which may be a daunting process if consumers don’t want to purchase a ticket with an airliner that uses the planes.

The 737 Max was originally grounded around the world due to two fatal accidents that occurred in March. The crashes claimed a total of 346 lives, and affected families are eligible to receive up to $144,500 in compensation from a fund of $50 million that Boeing established in July.

Things don’t appear to be getting any better for Boeing and its beleaguered 737 Max aircraft. Following an extended grounding period and an FAA report whic...

Article Image

FAA says Boeing 737 MAX was more prone to crashes than indicated

An internal review carried out by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) in the wake of the fatal Lion Air crash last October found that Boeing 737 MAX jets were far more likely to be involved in future crashes than Boeing regulators stated publicly, according to The Wall Street Journal. 

The FAA concluded last fall that additional crashes of the jets could have averaged one every two or three years, or 15 similar incidents globally in the next 30 to 45 years, if the plane didn’t undergo certain design changes. 

The prediction was included in a document released Wednesday at a House Transportation Committee hearing, which is investigating the FAA’s oversight of Boeing and the Max. 

Safety issues 

Despite knowing about the presence of an unsafe condition in a critical automated flight-control system, regulators declined to ground the aircraft after the first deadly crash. 

It wasn’t until a crash of an Ethiopian Airlines jet occurred in March that regulators decided to ground the aircraft worldwide. All told, the crashes claimed 346 lives.

“The FAA rolled the dice on the safety of the traveling public and let the Max continue to fly until Boeing could overhaul its MCAS software,” said Peter DeFazio, D-Ore., the chairman of the committee. The agency “failed to do its job,” he added. “It failed to provide the regulatory oversight necessary to ensure the safety of the flying public.”

The planes remain grounded today, with no timeline for a return to service. Regulators must still complete several additional steps before the plane is deemed safe to be reintroduced to flight schedules. The grounding is expected to continue into next year.

An internal review carried out by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) in the wake of the fatal Lion Air crash last October found that Boeing 737 MAX...

Article Image

Grounded Boeing 737 MAX not expected to fly anytime soon

Would you fly on a Boeing 737 MAX? Apparently, that’s not something you are going to have to worry about for a while.

The aircraft has been grounded since March following two crashes within five months. Both disasters -- the crash of a Ryan Air jet in October 2018 and March’s crash of an Ethiopian Airlines jet -- occurred shortly after the planes left the ground. The plane’s automated flight control system has been redesigned as a result.

Yet the planes remain grounded with no timetable for a return to the sky. Boeing has consistently said it hoped for Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) recertification by the end of the year but that has begun to look unlikely.

Even when the FAA gives the MAX a green light, the grounded planes probably won’t return to the air very quickly. Pilots have to be retrained before the airlines will be ready to return the aircraft to service, something that could take months.

Only three U.S. carriers affected

In the U.S., only three domestic airlines are affected. Southwest Airlines had been operating the most 737 MAX jets before the grounding, replacing its aging fleet of regular 737s. American and United operated a smaller number of planes.

All three airlines have made adjustments since the grounding, using different types of aircraft or consolidating routes. The airlines have encountered additional costs to maintain the grounded planes which have remained idle since March.

The 737 MAX has been a major headwind for Boeing this year. It had expected to deliver a number of the new jets to airlines around the world this year and next, but it has been unable to do so because of the grounding. Total Boeing aircraft sales are down 66 percent in 2019.

Even when the 737 MAX is cleared to return to service and pilots are fully trained, airlines may be slow to resume flights. Carriers will have to rebuild consumer confidence that has been eroded, not just by the grounding but by the continued delay in redesigning the flight control system.

Back in June, Delta Airlines CEO Ed Bastian predicted it would take longer than expected to return the 737 MAX to service. Bastian, whose airline does not operate the MAX aircraft, told CNBC that he expected it would take a while for consumer confidence in the plane to return.

Would you fly on a Boeing 737 MAX? Apparently, that’s not something you are going to have to worry about for a while.The aircraft has been grounded sin...

Article Image

United passengers will soon fly Airbus jets instead of Boeing aircraft

United Airlines passengers will soon be flying on Airbus jets instead of older Boeing 757 jetliners. The airline this week put in an order for 50 Airbus A321XLR aircraft.

Whether the airline would have considered the Boeing 737 MAX had it not been grounded was left unsaid, but it can’t be denied that Boeing’s problems have been good for its competitor’s business.

JetBlue and American have recently turned to Airbus when it was time to order new intermediate to long-range jets. The single-aisle jet is similar to the MAX and has an extended range, making it a versatile aircraft.

United plans to fly the new Airbus jets from its East Coast Hubs to Europe. They will replace its fleet of aging Boeing 757-200 jets that were produced between 1981 and 2004. At the time, it was the largest single-aisle passenger aircraft produced by any manufacturer.

Entering service in 2024

The new aircraft from Airbus are expected to enter service by 2024 for United’s transAtlantic routes from Newark and Washington.

"The new Airbus A321XLR aircraft is an ideal one-for-one replacement for the older, less-efficient aircraft currently operating between some of the most vital cities in our intercontinental network," said Andrew Nocella, United's executive vice president and chief commercial officer. "In addition to strengthening our ability to fly more efficiently, the A321XLR's range capabilities open potential new destinations to further develop our route network and provide customers with more options to travel the globe."

The newly-designed A321XLR offers modern amenities that include LED lighting, larger overhead bin space, and Wi-Fi connectivity. An added bonus, says United, is that the new aircraft will be much more fuel-efficient.

Related to 737 MAX problems?

While Boeing’s loss to Airbus can’t be directly traced to its problems with the 737 MAX aircraft, it certainly can’t be ruled out. As the company struggles to get the aircraft recertified after two crashes in five months, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has suggested that it won’t be rushed into giving Boeing a green light.

Boeing’s chief engineer, John Hamilton, who led Boeing’s efforts to investigate the two fatal 737 MAX crashes, announced his retirement Wednesday. Hamilton, along with Boeing CEO Dennis Muilenburg, testified before Congress at two hearings last month, defending the company’s actions in seeking certification of the jetliner.

United Airlines passengers will soon be flying on Airbus jets instead of older Boeing 757 jetliners. The airline this week put in an order for 50 Airbus A3...

Article Image

Flying somewhere in 2020? The new airline ratings are out

There are ratings and rankings for darn near everything: colleges, weight loss diets, annuities, even how much love consumers have for their cars. 

Some of the annual lists that ConsumerAffairs readers look forward to revolve around travel. After all, if travelers are going to spend their hard-earned money to have a good time on a vacation, then, by George, they should have a good idea of which vacation-related businesses should receive their patronage.

Earlier this year, ConsumerAffairs reported on the carriers that AirlineRatings found to be the safest, and most of those airlines have made it onto 2020’s “best of” list as well. 

Drum roll, please…

The Top 20

  1. Air New Zealand*

  2. Singapore Airlines*

  3. All Nippon Airways*

  4. Qantas*

  5. Cathay Pacific Airways*

  6. Emirates*

  7. Virgin Atlantic*

  8. EVA Air*

  9. Qatar Airways*

  10. Virgin Australia*

  11. Lufthansa*

  12. Finnair*

  13. Japan Airlines

  14. KLM*

  15. Korean Airlines

  16. Hawaiian Airlines*

  17. British Airways*

  18. Alaska Airlines*

  19. Delta Air Lines

  20. Etihad Airways

*AirlineRatings 2019 Top 20 “Safest Airline” 

Good day, mates!

Air New Zealand edge Singapore Air out of the top position this time around. As a matter of fact, airlines from this region took three of the top 10 slots because of their penchant for giving travelers what they want.

“In our analysis, Air New Zealand came out number one in most of our audit criteria, which is an outstanding performance when it’s up against carriers with more resources and scale on this same list of best airlines for 2020,” commented Airline Ratings Editor-in-Chief Geoffrey Thomas. 

“Air New Zealand’s commitment to excellence in all facets of its business starts at the top with outstanding governance and one of the best executive teams in aviation through to a workforce that is delivering consistently to the airline’s strategy and customer promise.”

Who owns the specialty trophies?

In consumer rankings, there’s no participation trophy like there is in youth sports. However, there are specialties -- like “Best Cabin Crew” -- that can impact how consumers feel about a carrier when they go to tell someone about their trip.

  • Best Premium Economy -- Air New Zealand

  • Best Cabin Crew -- Virgin Australia

  • Best Inflight Entertainment -- Emirates

  • Best Business Class -- Qatar

  • Best Lounges -- Qantas

  • Best Long-Haul Middle East -- Emirates

  • Most Improved Airline award for 2020 -- Cebu Pacific

  • Best Low-Cost Airlines: JetBlue (Americas), Wizz (Europe) and AirAsia / AirAsia X (Asia/Pacific) and Air Arabia (Middle-East / Africa)

Where are the U.S.-based airlines?

It’s painfully obvious that U.S.-based airlines don’t stack up well in AirlineRatings rankings (other than Delta and regional carriers Hawaiian and Alaska.)

The biggest issue, interestingly enough, is because of the weather. Snowstorms, in particular, can play havoc with on-time performance. For example, a few feet of snow in Chicago can cause a terrible domino effect for American Airlines and United since Chicago’s O’Hare is a major hub for both. Added to United’s winter woes are the hubs they have in Newark and Denver.

While weather can indeed be an issue, the U.S. is more relaxed about flight delays. With their collective feet not being held to the fire to get somewhere on time, U.S. carriers might have become a little lax in that regard. 

“In Europe, air passengers are well protected by European Commission Regulation EC261, which entitles travelers to be paid up to €600 in compensation for flight delays of more than three hours,” writes TheAirhelper. 

“On the other hand, US regulations don’t have a lot to say about air passenger rights regarding flight delays. So anytime bad weather hits, it’s a double-whammy: airline performance suffers and passengers lose money.”

There are ratings and rankings for darn near everything: colleges, weight loss diets, annuities, even how much love consumers have for their cars. Some...

Article Image

NTSB urges Boeing to redesign engines on 7,000 aircraft

Boeing is dealing with a safety issue that has nothing to do with the grounded 737 MAX aircraft.

The National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) has recommended that the aircraft manufacturer redesign the engines on 7,000 planes to prevent a repeat of a 2018 fatal accident.

In April 2018, a Southwest Airlines Boeing 737 on a flight from New York to Dallas had to make an emergency landing after one of the engines exploded and metal shrapnel broke one of the windows over the wing of the aircraft.

The passenger sitting next to the window, 43-year old Jennifer Riordan, was nearly sucked from the depressurized cabin and died from her injuries. As a result of its investigation of the accident, the NTSB has issued seven safety recommendations.

Conclusions

The NTSB concluded that a fractured fan blade from a CFM International CFM-56-7B engine, powering a Southwest Airlines Boeing 737-700, led to the engine inlet and fan cowl separating and subsequently damaging the fuselage, resulting in a rapid cabin depressurization.

“This accident demonstrates that a fan blade can fail and release differently than that observed during engine certification testing and accounted for in airframe structural analyses,” said NTSB Chairman Robert Sumwalt. “It is important to go beyond routine examination of fan blades; the structural integrity of the engine nacelle components for various airframe and engine combinations needs to be ensured.”

Of the seven NTSB recommendations, five were issued to the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), one was issued to the European Aviation Safety Agency, and one was issued to Southwest Airlines.

Structural integrity of the fan cowl

The recommendations stress the need to ensure the structural integrity of the fan cowl on the Boeing 737 next-generation aircraft. They also call for an assessment of whether other airframe and engine combinations have critical fan blade impact locations.

Of material concern to Boeing, the agency also recommended that Boeing redesign part of the outer covering of the aircraft’s engines to prevent it from striking the fuselage if a fan blade breaks free in the future.

The NTSB said all of next-generation Boeing 737 aircraft should be retrofitted with a suitable fix.

The issue has no bearing on the 737 MAX, which remains grounded following two crashes in five months. The 737 NG jets are much more numerous in airline fleets than the 737 MAX. They have also faced other issues, including the formation of cracks on some of the older aircraft.

Boeing is dealing with a safety issue that has nothing to do with the grounded 737 MAX aircraft.The National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) has rec...

Article Image

Boeing optimistic 737 MAX will return to service in January

Boeing says it expects the grounded 737 MAX aircraft to be recertified to return to commercial service next month.

The aircraft type has been grounded globally since March after two fatal accidents in five months that had similar characteristics.

In a statement on Monday, the aircraft manufacturer said it expects the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to give the green light in December and for commercial aircraft to resume service in January. Southwest, American, and United are the three domestic carriers that fly the 737 MAX.

Once the aircraft is recertified, pilots will need to undergo retraining because of changes made to the automated flight control system. The system was a suspect in both recent crashes of the 737 MAX and the software has been updated.

Flights may not resume until March

American and Southwest have announced they don’t expect to begin flying the grounded jet until March at the earliest. The airlines say they need at least a month to train flight crews and install the new system. Boeing, however, is more optimistic.

“We expect the Max to be certified, airworthiness directive issued, ungrounded in mid-December. We expect pilot training requirements to be approved in January,” Boeing spokesman Gordon Johndroe told Reuters.

In its statement, Boeing said there are five milestones that must be met before the 737 MAX can return to the sky:

  1. Multi-day flight simulator evaluations must be carried out with the FAA to ensure the software is performing as it should.

  2. A separate session between pilots and the FAA to make sure the software system performs its intended function.

  3. FAA pilots will conduct certification flights using the final updated software.

  4. After completion of the FAA certification flight, Boeing will submit the final certification deliverables and artifacts to the FAA to support software certification.

  5. The Joint Operational Evaluation Board (JOEB), a multi-regulatory body, will conduct a multi-day simulator session with global regulatory pilots to validate training requirements. Following the simulator session, the Flight Standardization Board will release a report for a public comment period, followed by final approval of the training.

Boeing says it worked with the FAA last week to complete the first step on the list. The company says it is now working toward the FAA line pilots evaluation and the FAA certification flight test. 

Boeing says it expects the grounded 737 MAX aircraft to be recertified to return to commercial service next month.The aircraft type has been grounded g...

Article Image

More issues with Boeing 737 aircraft emerge

No sooner had Boeing conceded that there were imperfections in its safety audit of the 737 MAX, than the company is facing yet another 737-related issue -- hairline cracks in Boeing’s 737NG aircraft. 

As ConsumerAffairs reported in early October, Boeing’s latest round of headaches began with Brazilian carrier Gol Transportes Aéreos grounded all 11 of its 737NG planes. Stateside, Southwest Airlines reported it grounded two of the planes, noting that it didn’t find any issues in the “vast majority” of planes.

Now there’s news that Australian carrier Qantas has discovered the same cracks in three of the 33 aircraft it inspected. Those planes were immediately pulled from service and sent out for repairs.

“We would never fly an aircraft that wasn’t safe,” said Andrew David, Qantas Domestic’s CEO. “Even where these hairline cracks are present they’re not an immediate risk, which is clear from the fact [that] the checks were not required for at least seven months.”

Not everyone is in agreement

The Australian Licensed Aircraft Engineers Association (ALAEA) took exception with David’s position. It urged Qantas to ground its entire 737 fleet until checks were complete.

"These aircraft should be kept safe on the ground until urgent inspections are completed," the ALAEA’s Steve Purvinas said in a statement. Purvinas primary reason behind his call for a total grounding started with Boeing’s original thinking that the cracks were occurring on aircraft with over 35,000 landings. However, in Qantas’ situation, the cracks were found on aircraft with under 27,000 landings -- a serious enough distinction that, in Purvinas’ estimation, warrants a system-wide grounding. However, Qantas’ David thinks Purvinas is off-base.

“Unfortunately, there were some irresponsible comments from one engineering union yesterday, which completely misrepresented the facts. Those comments were especially disappointing given the fantastic job our engineers have done to inspect these aircraft well ahead of schedule, and the priority they give to safety every day of the week,” David said.

What does Boeing have to say?

In comments to CBSNews, a Boeing spokesperson said the company "regrets the impact" the issue was having on its customers and was "working around the clock" to fix the problem.

"Boeing is actively working with customers that have airplanes in their fleets with inspection findings to develop a repair plan, and to provide parts and technical support as necessary.”

Are you booked on a 737NG?

The “NG” in Boeing’s 737NG name stands for “Next Generation,” and as of May 31, 2019, more than 7,000 aircraft of that model have been delivered to airlines around the world. Primary users of the 737NG include Qantas, Gol Transportes Aéreos, American Airlines, Southwest Airlines, Ryan Air, and United Airlines. 

If a traveler is concerned about whether they’ll be on one of the potentially affected aircraft, they can always go to FlightAware, type in the flight number, and the “aircraft type” will be listed under “flight information.” The airline’s help desk can also provide pertinent information.

No sooner had Boeing conceded that there were imperfections in its safety audit of the 737 MAX, than the company is facing yet another 737-related issue --...

Article Image

Boeing CEO admits mistakes were made in 737 Max’s development

In a hearing before the U.S. Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation, Boeing officials admitted that there were insufficiencies in the company’s safety assessments of the 737 Max. 

The testimony came a year after the first of two Boeing 737 Max jets crashed within a five-month time frame. The two crashes killed 346 people and prompted aviation officials to ground the planes until safety improvements were made.

The hearing on Tuesday was attended by more than a dozen relatives of people who were killed in the Boeing 737 Max crashes, and Boeing CEO Dennis Muilenburg opened with an apology to those families. 

“On behalf of myself and the Boeing company, we are sorry, we are deeply and truly sorry,” Muilenburg said. “We’ve made mistakes and we got some things wrong.”

Preventable accidents

Boeing has admitted that issues with the plane’s MCAS flight-control software were a factor in the crashes. The MCAS “responded to erroneous signals from a sensor that measures the airplane’s angle of attack,” the company said.

“Both of these accidents were entirely preventable,” Sen. Roger Wicker (R-Miss.), chair of the Commerce Committee, said to Muilenburg during the hearing. 

Members of the Committee criticized Boeing for failing to properly inform pilots about modifications that were made to the new model of the plane. 

“You set those pilots up for failure,” said Sen. Tammy Duckworth (D-Ill.)

Proposed fixes on the way

The testimony will continue on Wednesday before a House committee. Prepared remarks indicate that Muilenburg will say that his company is making changes to prevent similar disasters from taking place in the future. 

Last week, Boeing submitted its “final software load” containing proposed fixes for the 737 Max’s software. The Federal Aviation Administration is still reviewing the fixes. Before the planes can be cleared to return to service, the 737 Max will have to undergo a certification test flight. 

Muilenburg said over the summer that Boeing is aware that it will need to work “to earn and re-earn the trust of the flying public” in the wake of the two deadly crashes. 

“We are taking all actions necessary to make sure that accidents like those two ... never happened again,” he said. 

In a hearing before the U.S. Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation, Boeing officials admitted that there were insufficiencies in the co...

Article Image

Boeing pilot noticed 737 safety issues two years before first crash

A Boeing pilot admitted to “unknowingly” lying to regulators in 2016 about the safety of 737 Max jets, which have been grounded since mid-March in the wake of two fatal crashes. 

In messages released Friday, Boeing’s former chief technical pilot for the 737 complained to a colleague about the safety system, which is believed to be at least partly to blame for the accidents. Pilot Mark Forkner said in the messages that the MCAS software was making the plane difficult to control in a flight simulation.

“Oh shocker alert! MCAS is now active down to M .2. It’s running rampant in the sim on me,” Forkner told a colleague referring to the simulator, according to a transcript reviewed by the New York Times. “Granted, I suck at flying, but even this was egregious.”

Attorney says there was no “lie”

Forker then said he may have misled federal regulators when, months earlier, he had informed the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) that the system was safe and didn’t need to be included in pilot manuals. Regulators declared the 737 safe to be used for the public in 2017.

“I basically lied to the regulators (unknowingly),” he said, according to the Times. His colleague responded, “It wasn’t a lie, no one told us that was the case.”

Forkner’s attorney, David Gerger, told various news outlets that there was no “lie.” 

“If you read the whole chat, it is obvious that there was no ‘lie.’ The simulator was not reading right and had to be fixed to fly like the real plane,” Gerger said. “Mark’s career — at Air Force, at FAA, and at Boeing — was about safety. He would never put anyone in an unsafe plane. And based on everything he knew, he absolutely thought this plane was safe."

System implicated in crashes

Following the fatal crashes, investigators found that the MCAS repeatedly forced both planes into nosedives. The pilots attempted to regain control but ultimately couldn’t. 

“With the release of the preliminary report of the Ethiopian Airlines flight 302 accident investigation it’s apparent that in both flights the Maneuvering Characteristics Augmentation System, known as MCAS, activated in response to erroneous angle-of-attack information,” Boeing CEO Dennis Muilenburg said in April. 

Airline pilots said after the crashes that they did not know about the MCAS system until after the first crash, according to NBC News. 

The FAA said in a statement that the message exchange turned over by Boeing Thursday night is “concerning.” The agency is now considering how to respond. Boeing is facing criticism over waiting several months to turn the messages over to regulators. 

“I expect your explanation immediately regarding the content of this document and Boeing’s delay in disclosing the document to its safety regulator,” wrote FAA chief Dickson in a letter to Muilenburg. 

A Boeing pilot admitted to “unknowingly” lying to regulators in 2016 about the safety of 737 Max jets, which have been grounded since mid-March in the wake...

Article Image

Southwest to sunset its discounted senior fares

Travelers are always looking for a little advantage -- free checked baggage, a perk their rewards card will afford them, or a discounted fare -- anything that will make them feel like they got some sort of “deal.”

For seniors (65+) who fly Southwest Airlines, one of those perks is going away.

For what seems like forever, Southwest has offered seniors a special rate. As an example, when ConsumerAffairs ran a test reservation on Southwest.com, flying from Chicago Midway to Boston Logan, a senior might expect to pay $332 versus Southwest’s “Anytime” fare of $441 -- a 28 percent discount. 

For being a “budget” airline, senior travelers seemed to appreciate the little edge they received. 

“Their fares are the best considering the quality of service,” said Richard of Apollo Beach, FL, in a review on ConsumerAffairs. “I use their Senior fares if I cannot lock on to the Wanna Get Away fares.”

But, Southwest’s Senior fares are going the way of the airline’s peanuts. In other words, bye-bye.

Why is Southwest doing this?

ConsumerAffairs asked Southwest’s press office how the airline came to this decision. Here’s what the airline’s Ro Hawthorne had to say:

“After careful evaluation of the overall fare product, we’ve made the decision to sunset the Senior Fare option. Many of the same benefits that come with the Senior Fare product are just as easily achieved with Wanna Get Away fares including everyday low fares and reusable funds should a Customer cancel their trip. Additionally, Customers may sign up for Click n' Save or shop with our Low Fare Calendar for more low-fare options and fare sales,” Hawthorne said.

When asked whether too many seniors were taking advantage of its offer, Southwest’s answer shifted to the other offers it still has on the table.

“As you know, we don’t go into specific details regarding fare sales, but we can share Customers will continue to have great fare options through Wanna Get Away, Anytime and Business Select,” the company said.

How big of a deal is this?

Southwest fliers aren’t exactly up in arms about the change, mostly taking it in stride alongside all the other nuanced changes airlines have made over the last few years. 

“I don't really see how this is too big of a deal,” one Reddit user commented. “From my understanding, the senior fare was just a discount from the Anytime fare, so the “Wanna Get Away” fare was still cheaper. Additionally, there weren't even Senior fares on every flight, anyways.”

That’s actually a good point. When ConsumerAffairs took a second look at Southwest’s “Wanna Get Away” fare on that same Chicago-Boston route, some flights could be had for nearly $180 less than a Senior fare.

“Because there are lots of flight sales and deals floating around these days, it’s possible that a senior discount doesn’t represent the very best price for your flight,” is Skyscanner’s Danielle E. Owen’s take. “For example: imagine the senior discount offered is 5% off the ticket price. But the airline is also offering a 25% discount on a limited number of seats for that flight. It’d be much better to buy a seat in the flight sale than it would be to claim your senior discount, right?” 

It’s too early to know whether Southwest’s move will be dittoed by other airlines. As of now, both American and United still has their Senior programs in place.

Travelers are always looking for a little advantage -- free checked baggage, a perk their rewards card will afford them, or a discounted fare -- anything t...

Article Image

Inspectors find safety issue on another one of Boeing’s planes

As the Boeing 737 Max remains grounded worldwide, safety issues have been discovered on a critical part of another one of the company’s jets. 

Boeing’s 737 NG airliner, a slightly older variant of the 737 Max, is undergoing additional scrutiny following the discovery of structural cracks in the “pickle forks” of about 5 percent of the 800 planes inspected by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). 

Damaged “pickle forks,” which help keep the wings attached to the fuselage, could lead to a loss of control of the airplane, the FAA said. 

Last week, Boeing said it notified the FAA of the problem after discovering the cracks while “conducting modifications on a heavily used aircraft.” The FAA ordered the inspections after finding that “subsequent inspections uncovered similar cracks in a small number of additional planes.” 

Now, the agency says it’s working with international safety regulators to find out what caused the cracks. In the meantime, a “small number” of planes have been pulled from service. 

Planes with cracks to be grounded

Boeing hasn’t said which airlines operate planes that will have to be removed from service due to repairs. However, CNN notes that more than 100 airlines “own some version of the planes covered by the inspection order.” 

Brazilian carrier Gol said Wednesday that it grounded 11 planes in need of part replacement, and Southwest Airlines said it grounded two of the planes. Southwest noted that it didn’t find any issues in the “vast majority” of planes. 

In a statement, Boeing said it’s “working around the clock to provide the support needed to return all airplanes to service as soon as possible.” However, no time frame was provided for the completion of the repairs.

As the Boeing 737 Max remains grounded worldwide, safety issues have been discovered on a critical part of another one of the company’s jets. Boeing’s...

Article Image

Boeing 737 Max still undergoing safety reviews

Aviation officials said on Tuesday that Boeing 737 Max jets are still undergoing safety reviews, meaning the aircraft likely won’t return to service before November. 

Since being pulled from service in mid-March following two fatal crashes, regulators have been carrying out various safety assessments with the aim of resuming flights as soon as possible. 

Boeing said earlier this year that it’s taking a “comprehensive, disciplined approach” to resolving the safety issues, but it repeatedly stated that it hoped the aircraft would be cleared for reintroduction to flight schedules in the fourth quarter. However, U.S. and European Union regulators said this week that they’re still in the process of reviewing the revisions made to the aircraft. 

No firm return-to-service date

The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) said it doesn’t have a firm date for completing its review. The agency said it’s working closely with other aviation authorities during the safety review process and European Union regulators said they are in “continuous contact” with Boeing and the FAA regarding the matter, according to Reuters. 

“We do not at this stage have any specific concerns resulting from that assessment that would mean that we could not agree to a coordinated return to service. We are in continuous contact with both the FAA and Boeing,” a European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) spokeswoman told the publication. 

Implementing software revisions

The two crashes that took place within five months of each other were found to be linked to problems with the flight-control system. Boeing said it will be modifying the software in the aircraft’s flight-control system to allow it to receive input from both angle-of-attack sensors in the anti-stall system instead of just one.

The aircraft can’t be reintroduced to flight schedules until the FAA reviews a lengthy “final system description” document from Boeing, according to Reuters. Regulators will also need to conduct an “integrated system safety analysis,” as well as pilot workload management scenarios.

In May, Acting FAA Administrator Dan Elwell told the Seattle Times that the process “takes as long as it takes” and that the aircraft “will fly again when we have gone through all of the necessary analysis to determine that it is safe to do so.”

Aviation officials said on Tuesday that Boeing 737 Max jets are still undergoing safety reviews, meaning the aircraft likely won’t return to service before...

Article Image

Southwest pilots sue Boeing claiming lost pay because of 737 MAX grounding

The union representing pilots for Southwest Airlines has filed suit against Boeing, claiming problems with the 737 MAX 8 aircraft have resulted in lost wages.

The MAX aircraft was grounded in March after the second fatal accident in five months. The aircraft has remained grounded while Boeing attempts to develop an acceptable modification of the plane’s flight control software.

Out of all U.S. airlines, Southwest -- which flies the Boeing 737 aircraft exclusively -- has been most affected by the grounding of 737 MAX aircraft. Because flights using the aircraft have been canceled, the pilots claim they have lost $100 million in wages.

But in a statement, the Southwest Airlines Pilots Association (SWAPA) said it is not trying to put pressure on Boeing to recertify the aircraft as safe.

“As pilots, there is nothing more important to us than the safety of our passengers,” said Captain Jonathan L. Weaks, President of SWAPA. “We have to be able to trust Boeing to truthfully disclose the information we need to safely operate our aircraft. In the case of the 737 MAX, that absolutely did not happen.”

Southwest is the most affected airline

Southwest operates 34 737 MAX 8 jets, more than any other U.S. airline. It also has even more on order. The lawsuit claims that Southwest pilots agreed to fly the aircraft type based on Boeing’s assertions that the aircraft is safe. The union says those representations were false.

“Boeing’s errors cost the lives of 346 people, damaged the critical bond between pilots and passengers, and reduced opportunities for air travel across the United States and around the world,” the union said in a statement.

‘Meritless’

A Boeing spokesman called the lawsuit “meritless” and said the company will vigorously defend against it in court.

Boeing has come under increased pressure because of the two crashes and the resulting grounding of the 737 MAX aircraft type. But recent reports -- including one from the New York Times Magazine -- have suggested the two crashes were more likely the result of poor training of the flight crew. 

A recent Associated Press report cites a whistleblower who accuses Ethiopian Airlines, one of the carriers that lost a Boeing 737 MAX 8, of “a pattern of corruption that included fabricating documents, signing off on shoddy repairs and even beating those who got out of line.”

The union representing pilots for Southwest Airlines has filed suit against Boeing, claiming problems with the 737 MAX 8 aircraft have resulted in lost wag...

Article Image

FAA to test the safety of airplane seat sizes against the growing girth of fliers

If you’ve flown anywhere in the last few years, you’ve no doubt felt the pinch that today’s shrinking airline seats are causing. A congressional subcommittee has apparently felt the same pinch and is trying to things moving in the right direction once and for all.

In 2018, a bill -- Seat Egress in Air Travel (SEAT) -- was passed, giving the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) the power to establish minimums on airplane seat width and pitch (the space between a point on one seat and the same point on the seat in front of it). The objective of the bill was to ensure that airplanes can be safely evacuated in the statutorily mandated 90 seconds. 

To the dismay of traveling consumers, the FAA must’ve been stuck in its own seat and never moved forward with its newfound power. So, late last week, a frustrated House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee’s Subcommittee on Aviation called in FAA Deputy Administrator Daniel Elwell to ask why the SEAT Act has laid dormant. 

“I am concerned that the FAA has not fully complied with the provisions of my SEAT Act almost a year after it was signed into law,” complained Rep. Steve Cohen (D-TN), the original author of the bill.

“Americans are getting bigger so seat size is important but it’s got to be looked at in the context of safety,” Elwell admitted at the hearing.

Elwell clearly did his homework. The average American has gained some 30-odd pounds since 1960. At the same time, airline seats have been shrinking -- as much as 3.5 inches over the last 30 years.

Putting it to the test

With people and seat dimension stats in hand, the FAA is finally putting the situation under a microscope with a 12-day battery of tests. 

Slated for November at the Civil Aerospace Medical Institute in Oklahoma City, 720 demographically representative volunteers will be evaluated on critical and stressful moves they would likely encounter if an aircraft cabin had to be evacuated: flying with a lap child, being disabled, and situations where the lights are off and/or one or more of the exits is blocked.

Elwell’s preaching to the congressional choir was not only perfect timing but met warmly, by other regulators. 

“Beside whether I cram my backside into the seat, getting out would be a really useful thing,” said Rep. Paul Mitchell (R-MI).

“It is past time for the FAA to prioritize safe evacuation of airplanes in emergencies,” agreed Cohen. “I look forward to seeing the SEAT Act’s safety provisions implemented as soon as possible.”

If you’ve flown anywhere in the last few years, you’ve no doubt felt the pinch that today’s shrinking airline seats are causing. A congressional subcommitt...

Article Image

Airline to give passengers a heads-up on where babies and infants are sitting

There’s nothing to let travelers know where personal space perpetrators, seat kickers, or other etiquette offenders are sitting on a flight, but if you’re a flyer who agonizes about being seated close to a baby, one airline is rolling out the means to give you a heads-up.

Japan Airlines (JAL) has made the first move in letting passengers know what seats have been selected by other fliers traveling with children between 8 days and 2 years old. When a traveler goes to select their seats online, a child icon will appear on those seats. Whether those travelers want to seek out solace somewhere else on the flight is up to them.

It’s not a perfect system, though. JAL wants fliers to know that where those child icons show up might not be correct if the aircraft changes after booking. Seats booked as part of a tour, through the use of awards, or seats chosen through any other way than the JAL website aren’t part of the system either. 

Other airlines offer something similar, but not in the same technology-driven manner as JAL. Abu Dhabi-based Etihad Airways offers free flying nannies on some long-haul flights; Scoot Airlines, Singapore Air's budget brand, has child-free seating zones; and AirAsia X has a "quiet zone" on its flights, albeit for a $15 upcharge.

Improving the industry

Some travelers may think that the federal government should regulate seating. However, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) doesn’t hold that same view.

In spite of complaints about potential safety issues caused by the shrinking sizes of seats and legroom, the agency says it’s not in that business and it “has no evidence that there is an immediate safety issue necessitating rule-making at this time.”

Fliers have no “bill of rights,” per se. However, while flying continues to be low on the list of things consumers look forward to, airlines and airports are both doing what they can to turn that perception around. 

Airports are going as far as creating mazes, selling tacos, offering ice rinks, and even making 24/7 animal care and veterinary services available to travelers while they wait. And the airlines? There’s a lot of infrastructure that has to be modified, but airlines are trying to catch up to the digital age by offering charging outlets and free Wi-Fi.

There’s nothing to let travelers know where personal space perpetrators, seat kickers, or other etiquette offenders are sitting on a flight, but if you’re...

Article Image

Boeing will pay families of 737 MAX crash victims $144,500 each

Boeing announced that it will compensate the families of the 346 victims of two fatal 737 MAX crashes, paying out approximately $144,500 each. That amount comes from a financial assistance fund of $50 million the company set up in July.

As reported by Reuters, Boeing’s CEO Dennis Muilenburg called the endeavor “an important step in our efforts to help affected families.”

“The recent 737 MAX tragedies weigh heavily on all of us at Boeing, and we continue to extend our deepest sympathies to the families and loved ones of all those on board,” the executive said.

In addition to the $50 million in immediate assistance to the victims’ families, Boeing is also setting up a separate $50 million endowment to be used toward education and economic empowerment for communities and families impacted by the crashes.

Recommitment to safety

Boeing’s return to normalcy is far from complete. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) says there’s still work the aircraft manufacturer needs to do regarding the software that was apparently at the heart of the crashes.

Nonetheless, Boeing publicly reaffirmed its “longstanding commitment to aerospace safety and the safety of its products and services” on Wednesday. In a news release, Muilenburg introduced the creation of a permanent Aerospace Safety Committee as part of Boeing’s Board of Directors. The committee will be tasked with guaranteeing design safety, as well as monitoring other production processes.

Adding to the company’s recommitment to safety, the board also established other measures to minimize the possibility of future mishaps. These include:

  • A change in Boeing’s governance principles that will require safety-related experience as one of the factors it will utilize in choosing future board members. Until this change, the company’s governing principles had no references to safety at all.

  • The creation of a Product and Services Safety organization that will oversee all aspects of product safety, “including investigating cases of undue pressure and anonymous product and service safety concerns raised by employees.”

  • Amplifying the role and extending the reach of the Safety Promotion Center to include all of the company’s employees, offices, and factories in an effort to “reinforce Boeing's … safety culture and remind employees and the flying public of the company's unyielding commitment to safety, quality and integrity.”

“The safety of the global aviation industry is rooted in its dedication to continuous improvement and learning," said Adm. Edmund Giambastiani, Jr., former chairman of the Committee of Airplane Policies and Processes and newly appointed chairman of the Aerospace Safety Committee. "The independent committee review was extensive, rigorous and focused on delivering specific recommendations to ensure the highest levels of safety in Boeing airplanes and aerospace products and services and for all who fly on Boeing airplanes.” 

"The committee and the board believe these recommendations, along with actions already taken by the board, will strengthen engineering at the company, bolster the safety policies and procedures for the design, development and production of Boeing products and services, and further improve board and management oversight and accountability for safety not only at Boeing, but throughout the global aerospace industry.”

Boeing announced that it will compensate the families of the 346 victims of two fatal 737 MAX crashes, paying out approximately $144,500 each. That amount...

Article Image

Boeing’s 737 MAX still on hold while FAA waits for software updates

What’s going on with Boeing’s beleaguered 737 MAX?

After two fatal crashes of the fastest-selling aircraft in Boeing’s history -- the 737 MAX 8 aircraft -- in October 2018 and March 2019, aviation regulators around the world grounded the 737 MAX until further notice. That put airlines using the aircraft -- Southwest, American, and others -- into a whirlwind of fits and starts.

Those fits and starts -- including thorough scrutiny by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) -- are still happening, but reports have surfaced that there’s some light starting to appear at the end of this saga’s tunnel.

In a report from Reuters, FAA chief Steve Dickson met with Boeing officials on Thursday and was on hand to witness a simulated test of the latest version of the plane’s revised software. Dickson’s timeline for a re-launch of the plane holds out the possibility that it could be back in the air in about a month. However, the regulator was adamant he would not “sign off on the plane until I am personally satisfied.”

“We’ve had conversations about the importance of making sure that we are looking at complete documentation and not piecemeal documentation,” Dickson said. “It’s really better to be very methodical and very detailed rather than try to rush a partially completed product and then say, ‘We’ll get back to you with the rest of it.’”

The new timeline

The key component on the FAA’s checklist is Boeing’s “final system description” - a “500-ish page document that has the architecture of the flight control system and the changes that they have made,” Dickson said. Dickson went on to explain that the software changes must be in a “pre-production” code as opposed to a “beta version.”

After that, the FAA will move on to testing pilot workload management situations. Once that’s given the necessary thumbs-up, the agency feels it will be better able to define a realistic timeline for the actual certification test flight. 

That pilot workload step is a crucial one. For the benefit of everyone involved -- the consumer, Boeing, and regulators -- the FAA is also asking for input from the European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), as well as Canadian and Brazilian regulators to make sure everything’s as it should be. 

“We’ve got U.S. and international pilots that have to be scheduled to come out and actually go through the scenarios” and nail down training requirements, Dickson said.

If Boeing gets its wish, the flying public will see the MAX back in the skies sometime in the fourth quarter. That would be perfect timing for the airlines that would like to have it available for the holiday travel surge. Nonetheless, Boeing has been smart enough not to put the cart before the horse, reiterating on Thursday that it’s “committed to working collaboratively” with the FAA and other federal regulators.

What’s going on with Boeing’s beleaguered 737 MAX?After two fatal crashes of the fastest-selling aircraft in Boeing’s history -- the 737 MAX 8 aircraft...

Article Image

Aviation panel will reportedly criticize 737 MAX certification process

An international panel of aviation authorities and experts is reportedly planning to criticize the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) for the process it used to certify the Boeing 737 MAX aircraft.

The panel was formed after the aircraft was grounded in March following two fatal crashes within five months. In both accidents, investigations cited issues with the plane’s sophisticated flight control system.

The 737 MAX flew for the first time on January 29, 2016 and the FAA certified it in March 2017. The international task force formed to review the certification process is completing its work, and The Wall Street Journal reports that it plans to harshly criticize the FAA for giving Boeing too much input into the process.

In particular, The Journal reports the panel found fault with how the agency allowed the aircraft’s manufacturer to judge the safety of the plane’s flight control system.

Flight control system

After the March crash of an Ethiopian Airlines 737 MAX 8, attention turned to the flight control system and how it takes over control of the aircraft when it perceives it is rising at too steep of an angle.

Investigators believe that it can be difficult for pilots to exert manual control if the sophisticated computer system receives faulty data from sensors located on the outside of the plane. In both the Ethiopian Airlines crash and the loss of a Ryan Air 737 MAX 8 five months earlier, the planes went into dives and lost altitude as they were in the process of taking off.

The Journal says the final report will also fault the FAA for a lack of transparency and not sharing enough information with other nations’ aviation authorities.

Changes suggested

In August, there were reports indicating that the international aviation panel would recommend changes in the way the FAA goes about certifying the safety of commercial aircraft. The Journal now reports the aviation experts will go beyond suggesting changes by assigning blame.

The FAA has a new administrator, Steve Dickson, who has been on the job for about a month. Dickson said this week that there is no firm timetable for returning the 737 MAX to the air. Dickson, a former pilot, also said he plans to personally test Boeing’s updated 737 MAX flight control software in a flight simulator.

An international panel of aviation authorities and experts is reportedly planning to criticize the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) for the process it...

Article Image

Spirit Airlines lawsuit over baggage fees returns to appeals court

A lawsuit against budget carrier Spirit Airlines, accusing it of failing to notify customers about certain fees, has been revived by a federal appeals court, Reuters reports.

The case was brought by nearly two dozen passengers who claim the airline never notified them about carry-on bag fees when they booked their flight online on third-party websites such as Cheapoair, Expedia, Priceline, and Travelocity.

The class action suit -- which was dismissed last November -- claims the low-cost carrier failed to disclose that consumers would be charged higher prices for baggage services than competing airlines charge, “thereby making any apparent savings illusory.”

The 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals said the plaintiffs could proceed with the suit because there was no evidence that Spirit notified them about the fees in question. The court also said there were “ambiguous” fees rolled into prices.

Hidden fees

The passengers allege that Spirit knew its online travel agents “hid the ‘gotcha’ bag fees they would have to pay at the airport,” Reuters said. “They said these fees often exceeded the cost of their tickets, and totaled millions of dollars a year.” 

Spirit attempted to counter the points raised in the suit by saying federal law precluded the lawsuit and that it’s “contract of carriage” provided that a passenger could take one carry-on bag into the cabin, for a fee.

The case has now been returned to U.S. District Judge William Kuntz in Brooklyn.

“This is a great victory for air travelers nationwide,” the plaintiffs’ lawyer John Hermina told Reuters, adding that his clients intend to pursue their case in the court.

A lawsuit against budget carrier Spirit Airlines, accusing it of failing to notify customers about certain fees, has been revived by a federal appeals cour...

Article Image

British Airways cancels nearly all flights today and tomorrow

British Airways (BA), which is facing a strike by its pilots, has taken the unusual step of canceling nearly all of its flights today and Tuesday.

In an update to its customers, the airline said the union had not provided any details about which pilots would strike and therefore it had no way of knowing which flights would be grounded. Without that knowledge, it said it had to assume all would be grounded.

“Our customer teams – supported by additional colleagues - have been working tirelessly to help as many of you as possible and to provide options, including a full refund or re-booking to a different date of travel or alternative airline,” the airline said. “We are offering all affected customers full refunds or the option to re-book to another date of travel or alternative airline.”

BA-owned airlines BA CityFlyer, SUN-AIR and Comair are not affected by the pilots’ walkout. The airline is advising that its customers "not go to the airport."

The union has been in prolonged negotiations with the airline and has planned a 48-hour walkout to leverage its position. The union is seeking an increase in pay and benefits for its members.

Limited strike

The British Airline Pilots Association (BALPA) has given notice that its members will walk out on Sept, 9, 10, and 27 -- a limited and not ongoing strike. 

“Over several days of talks BALPA put forward a number of packages that we believe would have resolved this dispute without a strike, and which we could have recommended to our members for acceptance prior to strike action,” the union said in a statement.

The union says the airline did not accept any of its proposals, and it believes that ongoing talks would not achieve progress. The organization also points out that this is the first time that its pilots have voted to go on strike in the 100 years of British Airways’ operation.

British Airways (BA), which is facing a strike by its pilots, has taken the unusual step of canceling nearly all of its flights today and Tuesday.In an...

Article Image

United passengers booked aboard a 737 MAX jet may switch with no penalty

The Boeing 737 MAX, grounded since March, may be back in the air by the end of the year. When it is, United Airlines says you don’t have to fly it if you don’t want to.

Andrew Nocella, chief commercial officer at United, told an investor conference this week that passengers booked aboard flights scheduled to fly the grounded aircraft can change flights without paying a fee.

The 737 MAX was grounded in March after the second fatal crash in five months, believed to be for the same or similar reasons. At the time it was believed the grounding would be for a short time while a software change was made. However, it has extended month after month, forcing the airlines to cancel flights scheduled to use the jet.

"We need to get through the recertification process, return the aircraft to service and see how things go," Nocera said at the conference. "If somebody is uncomfortable getting on the aircraft, we want to make sure we can put them on a different aircraft."

United has little exposure

Of all the domestic airlines, United has the least exposure to the 737 MAX. It was operating only 14 of the jets at the time of the grounding. American and Southwest fly more. Still, the airline is addressing an issue that may prove to be a problem for the aircraft and the airlines that fly it.

Once the world’s aviation authorities declare that the 737 MAX is safe to fly, will passengers still prefer to fly on another aircraft type? And if so, what will it take to calm fears?

The 737 MAX is a variation of the venerable Boeing 737, used by airlines around the world for short hops. Southwest Airline flies the Boeing 737 exclusively and added the 737 MAX 8 to its fleet to accommodate more passengers.

The aircraft type flew for the first time in early 2016 and achieved certification from the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) a year later. In October 2018 a Ryan Air 737 MAX 8 crashed on takeoff in Indonesia. In March of this year, an Ethiopian Airlines 737 MAX 8 also crashed on takeoff under similar circumstances.

Similarities

While investigations into the two crashes were completely independent, the similarities of their findings have strongly suggested a common cause. An angle-of-attack sensor, located on the plane’s fuselage, sends a signal to the flight control system if it determines the plane is climbing at too steep an angle, which could lead to a stall.

In both instances, investigators believe the sensor may have transmitted faulty information to the flight control system during takeoff, triggering an automated response that pointed the nose of the plane down when it should have been climbing.

The big question at this point is just exactly when the 737 MAX aircraft will return to service. Boeing officials have said they are hopeful the plan can return to the skies as early as next month.

The Boeing 737 MAX, grounded since March, may be back in the air by the end of the year. When it is, United Airlines says you don’t have to fly it if you d...

Article Image

Hurricane Dorian creates big impact on air travel

As people get ready to protect themselves against Hurricane Dorian on the ground, people taking to the air over the next few days should do the same.

During natural disasters such as Dorian, it’s a common occurrence for airports to close and flight paths to be re-routed, and there’s always a domino effect that comes from those actions.

Some airports have resumed service in locations where Dorian has passed -- such as American Airlines service out of Fort Lauderdale, Florida and Nassau, Bahamas. Whether service is active or suspended is locale-dependent, as is the case in the Bahamas where Nassau was unscathed by Dorian while some of the islands’ other 50-some airport locations weren’t so lucky.

If you’re booked on a flight along Dorian’s path

Storms the size and strength of Dorian may require travelers to change travel plans, but at no extra cost. In ConsumerAffairs research, we found that airlines are showing great flexibility in capping fares and waiving baggage fees. United and American are going as far as waiving change fees for future travel if a customer chooses not to fly to or from another airport.

However, those waivers do have some minor restrictions --mostly related to dates -- so if you have a flight booked anywhere along Dorian’s path, it’s important to review what all the available options are.

Airline-specific information can be found at the following links:

  • American Airlines

  • Frontier Airlines

  • JetBlue

  • Southwest Airlines

  • Spirit

  • United Airlines

The FAA’s new hurricane season efforts

Realizing that the stakes are high as a result of natural disasters, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) launched a campaign earlier this year to function more effectively during hurricane season.

“The main issue with hurricanes is the unknown,” said the FAA’s Ginny Boyle in a video detailing the FAA’s efforts. “We never know how long it will linger. Just the torrential downpours -- that they kind of stall. And then how fast our response can be to come back in. In order to kind of assess the damage and see what we can do to help the people that are on the ground.”

To that end, the FAA makes available both a detailed list of temporary flight restrictions and information about flight delay information from its Air Traffic Control System Command Center.

The FAA cautions travelers that because one of its traffic management programs is creating delays for some arriving flights, departing flight schedules may also be affected. The agency suggests travelers check with their airlines directly to see if a flight they’re scheduled on is affected.

As people get ready to protect themselves against Hurricane Dorian on the ground, people taking to the air over the next few days should do the same.Du...

Article Image

United Airlines removes mileage expiration for loyalty members

United Airlines has announced that it will no longer bar members of its MileagePlus program from using their frequent flyer miles after 18 months of account inactivity. 

In an announcement, the carrier said it’s done away with mileage expiration in an effort to show its “long-haul” commitment to customers. The change is taking place effective immediately. 

"We want to demonstrate to our members that we are committing to them for the long-haul and giving customers a lifetime to use miles is an exceptionally meaningful benefit," said United's vice president of loyalty, Luc Bondar. 

"Our MileagePlus program provides customers more ways to earn and use miles than any other US airline. More customers used miles to book award trips in 2018 than in any year before, and we expect with today's announcement that even more will use miles to travel the world in the years to come."

Delta put an end to its policy of letting miles expire after 18 months back in 2011. JetBlue has also chosen not to place an expiration date on its members’ frequent flyer miles.

American Airlines’ AAdvantage members must still redeem their miles before 18 months of account inactivity have been detected. Southwest Airlines’ frequent flyer points expire after two years of account inactivity. 

United Airlines has announced that it will no longer bar members of its MileagePlus program from using their frequent flyer miles after 18 months of accoun...

Article Image

Boeing 737 MAX panel will reportedly call for changes in FAA plane certification process

A panel created in the wake of the two deadly Boeing 737 MAX crashes is expected to recommend that the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) change the way it certifies new planes, CNN reports. 

The international panel, called the Joint Authorities Technical Review (JATR), is in the "final stages of completing their work,” sources tell CNN. The team, which consists of both U.S. officials and representatives from aviation agencies from nine other countries, is expected to issue its report on the matter as early as next week. 

Preventing future problems

Since the crashes, officials have been examining the FAA's processes with the goal of ensuring that problems similar to the one that caused two Boeing 737 aircraft to crash within a five month period don’t happen again. 

All Boeing 737 MAX aircraft were grounded in March following the crashes, which were later linked to a flaw in the MCAS automated stabilization system. 

Prior to being cleared to fly, the jets hadn’t undergone the full certification process for a new plane because Boeing had argued that the plane was simply an updated version of an existing aircraft. 

Now, the JATR team is preparing to make “several recommendations that will be presented to the FAA,” CNN reported. “It is not clear if the agency plans to accept or publicly release the recommendations.” 

In a statement, the FAA said reviews of its processes are still taking place. 

"The FAA's certification of the Boeing 737 MAX is the subject of several independent reviews and investigations that will examine all aspects of the five-year effort. While the agency's certification processes are well-established and have consistently produced safe aircraft designs, we welcome the scrutiny from these experts and look forward to their findings. We will carefully review all recommendations and will incorporate any changes that would improve our certification activities."

A panel created in the wake of the two deadly Boeing 737 MAX crashes is expected to recommend that the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) change the way...

Article Image

New study reveals the fastest and slowest security checkpoint times for U.S. airports

The days of flying through an airport to catch a flight are long gone. Since 9/11, travelers have had to slow their roll and endure the sloth-like TSA pre-check lines.

As technology improved and fliers started to use Trusted Traveler programs like Global Entry, the pace of getting through the screening process has picked up. Still, getting the good-to-go from the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) can be a pain and often depends on whether you’re flying into or out of the U.S. or through an airline’s hub -- like Delta in Atlanta or American Airlines in Chicago.

UpgradedPoints decided to measure those TSA wait times at the best and worst times of day to see which times consumers should aim for when maneuvering their way through checkpoints. 

The best domestic airport with the fastest TSA security line time was Salt Lake City International (SLC), with an average wait time of 9.1 minutes. SLC is the fourth-largest hub for Delta Air Lines, with nearly 300 daily departures. The airport also gets a lot of traffic from Southwest Airlines, American Airlines, and Alaska Airlines.

Here’s how the Top 5 in the “fastest” category match up:

Airport

Average TSA Wait Time (minutes)

Best & Worst Times to Go Through Security

Salt Lake (SLC)

9.1

Fastest: Wednesday from 6-7 p.m.

Slowest: Sunday from 11 p.m.-12 a.m. -- about 26 minutes.

Washington Dulles (IAD)

10.5

Fastest: Tuesday, Wednesday, and Thursday from 10-11 p.m. -- about 1 minute.

Slowest: Fridays from 9-10 a.m. -- about 28 minutes.

Boston Logan (BOS)

10.6

Fastest: Thursdays at 10-11 p.m. -- around 3 minutes.

Slowest: Friday at 5-6 p.m. -- close to 45 minutes.

Minneapolis-St. Paul (MSSP)

13

Fastest: Saturdays from 8-9 p.m. -- 1 minute.

Slowest: Mondays, 2-3 p.m. -- 43 minutes. 

Charlotte (CLT) and Detroit Metro (DTW) -- tie

13.2

Charlotte

Fastest: Wednesday from 4-5 a.m. -- 2 minutes.

Slowest: Thursday from 5-6 p.m. -- 29-minute wait time.

Detroit

Fastest: Thursday from 10-11 p.m. -- 1 minute wait time.

Slowest: Sunday from 5-6 a.m. -- about 33 minutes.

And the worst?

For those of you guessing that Atlanta’s Hartsfield (ATL) takes home the slower-than-molasses trophy, you’d be mistaken. While ATL is the busiest airport in the world and the 7th slowest based on UpgradedPoints analysis, it’s actually Newark Liberty International (EWR) that rules the losers bracket.

Given what ConsumerAffairs knows about the Newark airport, it can’t be much fun for travelers. Fliers going in and out of EWR are unhappy to begin with, but when you add in a thumb-twiddling 23.1 minutes to get through its TSA lines, that frustration goes up even higher.

“As with many airport inconveniences, however, there are steps you can take to avoid this wait time,” UpgradedPoints wrote. “If you’re booking a trip that goes through Newark, the best time to go through TSA would be Friday from 10-11 p.m., which had an average wait time of 15 minutes. The worst time would be Monday from 12-1 p.m., which would have you waiting in security lines for about 60 minutes.”

The Top 5 “worst” play out like this:

Airport

Average TSA Wait Time (minutes)

Best & Worst Times

to Go Through Security

Newark Liberty International (EWR)

23.1

Fastest: Friday from 10-11 p.m.,

which had an average wait time

of 15 minutes.

Slowest: Monday from 12 noon-1

p.m. -- 60 minutes.

George Bush Intercontinental, Houston (IAH)

19.8

Fastest: 5-6 a.m. on Wednesdays --

close to 51 minutes.

Slowest: Sunday from 5-6 p.m.

-- 51 minutes.

Miami International (MIA)

19.6

Fastest: Sunday from 10-11 p.m.

-- an average of about 8 minutes.

Slowest: Thursday, 4-5 a.m.

-- 37 minutes.


Baltimore-Washington International (BWI)

18.2

Fastest: Wednesday, Thursday,

and Friday from 10 – 11 p.m

. -- a 2 minutes average.

Slowest: Mondays

from 2-3 p.m. -- up to 35 minutes.

Las Vegas McCarron (LAS)

17.3

Fastest: Tuesday from

6-7 p.m. -- about 7 minutes. 

Slowest: Sunday,

6-7 a.m., -- 37 minutes.

“The wait time in TSA security lines is a common topic of conversation for travelers, and this study offers real data to back up what many experience at the airport,” UpgradedPoints’ Alex Miller told ConsumerAffairs. “Travelers can find information about their airport by using the TSA Security mobile app. It has historical wait time information by hour.”

The days of flying through an airport to catch a flight are long gone. Since 9/11, travelers have had to slow their roll and endure the sloth-like TSA pre-...

Article Image

FAA hopes civil aviation authorities simultaneously approve Boeing 737 MAX fix when it’s ready

Boeing 737 MAX jets have yet to be reintroduced to airlines’ daily flight schedules, but the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) is hoping civil aviation regulators across the globe approve Boeing’s fixes for the aircraft at about the same time. 

In a letter to Congress seen by Reuters, the FAA’s acting administrator said the agency “hopes to achieve near simultaneous approval from the major civil aviation authorities around the world” 

The planes were grounded worldwide in mid-March in the wake of two fatal crashes that occurred just five months apart. The crashes were determined to be caused by a software error. 

Planes still grounded

Boeing CEO Dennis Muilenburg said recently that he was optimistic that the MAX would be cleared to return to the skies as early as October following a certification flight in “the September time frame.” Some have estimated that the planes may not resume service until next year.

Acting FAA Administrator Dan Elwell told Congress that the agency “will lift the 737 MAX grounding order only when it is safe to do so.”

The agency’s words to Congress come a few weeks after FAA officials found another potential problem in the 737 MAX’s computer system. During simulator sessions, the flaw raised alarm for its potential to cause the aircraft to dive in instances where it should be climbing. 

“I’m sure this will cause us to have to take the MAX out of the schedule beyond Oct. 1,” Southwest CEO Gary Kelly told employees in early July, according to Reuters. Kelly added that the company would also see “what other modifications we might need to make our plans for this year because it’s obviously extending well beyond what I had hoped.”

Boeing 737 MAX jets have yet to be reintroduced to airlines’ daily flight schedules, but the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) is hoping civil aviation...

Article Image

Boeing tells investors it may slow or stop production of 737 MAX jets

Back in March, the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) grounded all of Boeing’s 737 MAX aircraft due to an error that had caused two fatal crashes. Now, executives are saying that they may need to slow or completely stop production of the planes altogether. 

In a conference call with investors on Wednesday, CEO Dennis Muilenburg said that Boeing may make the move if the shutdown of its planes continues much longer. The company is currently trying to fix a software issue affecting the planes, and it may not meet with aviation officials until September. That could result in the 737 MAX planes not returning to service until October, according to CNN. Other estimates posit that the planes may not return until next year.

“Should our estimate of the anticipated return to service change, we might need to consider possible further rate reductions or other options, including a temporary shutdown of the Max production,” Muilenburg said. 

Boeing takes a financial a reputational hit

The grounding of its most popular line of jets hit Boeing hard during the second quarter. In addition to revealing its potential plans for the 737 MAX, the company revealed that it had its worst financial decline ever during the second quarter -- accounting for $3.38 billion in losses on $15.7 billion in revenue, according to the Washington Post.

On top of its financial losses, Muilenburg has previously stated that Boeing will need to also work hard to win back airline companies and travelers alike. 

“We know...that the public’s confidence has been hurt by these accidents and that we have work to do to earn and re-earn the trust of the flying public, and we will do that,” he said. “We are taking all actions necessary to make sure that accidents like those two...never happen again.”

Back in March, the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) grounded all of Boeing’s 737 MAX aircraft due to an error that had caused two fatal crashes. Now...

Article Image

Airlines could soon offer faster satellite-based Wi-Fi service at no charge

Airlines currently partner with services like Gogo to offer Wi-Fi connectivity to passengers who are willing to pay a fee. However, airlines could soon start offering Wi-Fi for free. 

Carriers who make in-flight Wi-Fi possible say the service will likely become free on most flights in about two years, according to a Wall Street Journal report. 

If in-flight internet connectivity were to become free, the Journal notes that the current percentage of passengers who choose to purchase access would rise significantly, from 6-7 percent to about 40-60 percent. 

High demand for Wi-Fi on planes

Airlines are increasingly looking to use satellite systems, which offer a larger coverage area and more consistent connectivity, to provide internet access to passengers. 

Just last month, American Airlines finished equipping its fleet of more than 700 narrowbody aircraft with faster and more consistent satellite-based internet access  The faster service will either be provided by Gogo 2Ku or ViaSat Ka depending on where passengers are traveling. 

“Satellite-based Wi-Fi allows customers to stream video without buffering or interruptions; upload and download les with ease; and stay connected from gate to gate,” the airline said in a statement. “Upgraded bandwidth capacity ensures customers won’t compromise on connection quality or speed, even if every customer chooses to access inflight internet at the same time.” 

Many passengers surveyed have said having a reliable internet connection while flying is more important to them than food or even comfort. For this reason, airlines making it a priority to deploy faster satellite-based Wi-Fi.

“We did a good job of training people that the Internet was slow and expensive on a plane,” says John Wade, president of commercial aviation at Gogo, told the Washington Post. “We now need them to realize that they’re in a different world today.”

Airlines currently partner with services like Gogo to offer Wi-Fi connectivity to passengers who are willing to pay a fee. However, airlines could soon sta...

Article Image

Southwest Airlines cancels its 737 MAX flights through November 2

The 737 MAX suffered another setback Thursday, as Southwest Airlines announced it’s delaying the return of Boeing’s beleaguered aircraft to its schedule to November 2 at the earliest.

“Southwest Airlines continues to monitor information from Boeing and the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on the impending 737 MAX software enhancements and training requirements,” the company said in an announcement. “We remain confident that, once certified by the FAA, the enhancements will support the safe operation of the MAX.”

Southwest -- which has 31 737 MAX planes currently in its fleet and a total order of 280 -- had already revised its flight schedule twice. Like its 737 MAX peers, United and American, Southwest is at Boeing’s mercy while it continues its quest to make sure every single flaw is found and corrected.  

“By proactively removing the MAX from scheduled service, we can reduce last-minute flight cancellations and unexpected disruptions to our Customers' travel plans,” Southwest wrote.

“The limited number of Customers who have already booked their travel and will be affected by our amended schedule are being notified of their re-accommodated travel according to our flexible accommodation procedures. The revision will proactively remove roughly 180 daily flights from our schedule out of our total peak-day schedule of more than 4,000 daily flights.”

“We offer our apologies to our Customers impacted by this change, and we thank them for their continued patience.”

Boeing weighs in 

Boeing is in a tough spot with consumer confidence, customer trust, governmental go-ahead, and investor faith all weighing in the balance.

As to the ledger side of the equation, Boeing announced that it “will recognize an impact to earnings” in anticipation of its second-quarter 2019 results set for release on July 24. The company admits that the impact is related to “concessions and considerations” it’s taken regarding the 737 MAX grounding. Boeing reports that the charge will result in a $5.6 billion reduction of revenue and pre-tax earnings in the quarter.

As for the other components, Boeing says it’s continuing to work with civil aviation authorities to make sure the 737 MAX’s return to service is safe. 

"We remain focused on safely returning the 737 MAX to service," said Boeing Chairman, President and CEO Dennis Muilenburg. "This is a defining moment for Boeing. Nothing is more important to us than the safety of the flight crews and passengers who fly on our airplanes. The MAX grounding presents significant headwinds and the financial impact recognized this quarter reflects the current challenges and helps to address future financial risks."

The 737 MAX suffered another setback Thursday, as Southwest Airlines announced it’s delaying the return of Boeing’s beleaguered aircraft to its schedule to...

Article Image

United Airlines makes arrangements to replace grounded 737 MAX jets

United Airlines, of all the U.S. carriers, has the least exposure to the grounded Boeing 737 MAX aircraft. But that doesn’t mean the plane’s problems haven’t become the airline’s problems.

United only owns 14 of the planes, but it has been forced to cancel flights using the aircraft through November 2 because of uncertainty over the plane’s status. It’s been grounded worldwide since March after two of the planes crashed within five months -- most likely for the same reason.

United appears to be hedging its bets, announcing that it plans to purchase 19 used Boeing 737-700 aircraft, expected to take the place of the newer grounded aircraft. The used jets are similar to the MAX 9 aircraft but are slightly smaller. 

Used mostly for short hops and regional flights, the 737 aircraft are expected to fill the void that has been left by the absence of the MAX jets. The 737-700 can seat 126 passengers, slightly less than the 179 that can be fitted aboard the MAX 9.

Insurance policy

In a way, the purchase of the used aircraft amounts to an insurance policy. The MAX 9 may be cleared to fly again by December when United is scheduled to take delivery. Then again, it might not.

The grounding was expected to be for a relatively short time, centered on a software fix in the plane’s flight control system. But other problems arose, keeping the plane on the ground.

The addition to the fleet will enable United to increase its capacity, which it has pledged to do to the tune of as much as 4 percent per year. Without those seats, growth could be a difficult task.

Even with the grounding of the 737 MAX aircraft United had a strong second quarter. This week the airline reported revenue rose to $11.4 billion, a 6 percent gain on the second quarter of last year.

Return could be pushed to 2020

The purchase of the used 737 aircraft may turn out to be a prudent move. The return-to-service date of Boeing 737 MAX jets could be pushed into 2020 amid safety concerns from regulators and Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) officials. 

Last month, Boeing CEO Dennis Muilenburg expressed optimism that the 737 MAX would be back in service by the end of the year. He said Boeing was conducting simulated flights with air-safety regulators and would soon operate test flights with the FAA. However, airlines have been more cautious with their predictions on when the aircraft will be deemed safe to return to daily flight schedules. 

United Airlines, of all the U.S. carriers, has the least exposure to the grounded Boeing 737 MAX aircraft. But that doesn’t mean the plane’s problems haven...

Article Image

Boeing 737 MAX may not return to service until early next year

The return-to-service date of Boeing 737 MAX jets could be pushed into 2020 amid safety concerns from regulators and Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) officials. 

On Friday, United Airlines canceled flights through November 2. Just a few days later, American Airlines followed suit and canceled flights through the same date. American Airlines cited the need for a fix to be developed for an issue discovered last month. 

"American Airlines remains confident that impending software updates to the Boeing 737 MAX, along with the new training elements Boeing is developing in coordination with our union partners, will lead to recertification of the aircraft this year," the airline said in a statement on Sunday.

Could extend into next year

But some airline industry officials believe January 2020 is more likely to be the month the jets are cleared to return to the skies, according to the Wall Street Journal. 

Last month, Boeing CEO Dennis Muilenburg expressed optimism that the 737 MAX would be back in service by the end of the year. He said Boeing was conducting simulated flights with air-safety regulators and would soon operate test flights with the FAA. However, airlines have been more cautious with their predictions on when the aircraft will be deemed safe to return to daily flight schedules. 

“By proactively removing the MAX from scheduled service, we can reduce last-minute flight cancellations and unexpected disruptions to our customers' travel plans,” Southwest Airlines said in a recent statement.

All Boeing 737 MAX jets have been grounded since mid-March following two fatal crashes which killed a total of 356 people. In recent months, Boeing has said it’s aware that it will have to work to regain customers’ trust even after it retrains pilots and upgrades its software. 

The return-to-service date of Boeing 737 MAX jets could be pushed into 2020 amid safety concerns from regulators and Federal Aviation Administration (FAA)...

Article Image

Delta flight makes emergency landing after engine breaks up

It was a scary moment for passengers aboard a Delta Air Lines flight from Atlanta to Baltimore this week.

Delta’s flight 1425, utilizing a 32-year old MD-88 jet, made an emergency landing in North Carolina after passengers heard a loud boom and then saw smoke pouring into the cabin. A passenger seated by a window overlooking the wing shot this frightening video and posted it to Twitter.

The video appears to show a portion of the engine called a spinner that had become detached and was rattling around inside the engine, which also appeared to be on fire. Other passengers reported bits of metal flying off the engine, as though it were coming apart.

The plane landed safely in Raleigh, N.C. and passengers deplaned with no reports of injuries. One passenger told WMAR-TV that the plane slowed down after the incident and the temperature in the cabin began to rise.

"We apologize to our customers for the inconvenience this diversion may have caused,” Delta said in a statement. 

The airline said it gave the 148 passengers a $30 food voucher while they waited to be booked on another flight. Meanwhile, the engine has been replaced and the MD-88 is reportedly back in service.

Eerily similar

The incident is eerily similar to an April 2018 incident in which an engine on a Southwest Airlines Boeing 737 jet exploded mid-flight, with metal from the fragmenting engine breaking a window and killing a passenger.

The incident prompted Southwest to step up an inspection of CFM56 engines, the type that failed.

The MD-88 is part of the MD-80 series produced by McDonnell Douglas as an upgrade of the DC-9; it is used mostly for short-haul flights. The company was acquired by Boeing in 1997.

It was a scary moment for passengers aboard a Delta Air Lines flight from Atlanta to Baltimore this week.Delta’s flight 1425, utilizing a 32-year old M...

Article Image

Southwest expects Boeing 737 MAX to remain grounded beyond October 1

Due to the surfacing of a new safety concern, Boeing 737 MAX jets will likely be forced to remain grounded beyond the expected return-to-service date of October 1.

Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) officials recently found another potential problem in the 737 MAX’s computer system. During simulator sessions, the flaw raised alarm for its potential to cause the aircraft to dive in instances where it should be climbing. 

“I’m sure this will cause us to have to take the MAX out of the schedule beyond Oct. 1,” Southwest CEO Gary Kelly told employees on Monday, according to Reuters. Kelly added that the company would also see “what other modifications we might need to make our plans for this year because it’s obviously extending well beyond what I had hoped.”

Avoiding canceled flights

Upon being informed of the new safety issue, Southwest and United Airlines immediately announced extended cancellations for flights using the MAX. Southwest said this week that cancellations will now extend from September 2 through October 1.

“By proactively removing the MAX from scheduled service, we can reduce last-minute flight cancellations and unexpected disruptions to our customers' travel plans,” the airline said. “The limited number of customers who have already booked their travel and will be affected by our amended schedule are being notified of their re-accommodated travel according to our flexible accommodation procedures.” 

United and American Airlines have also canceled affected flights until early September. 

Boeing 737 MAX aircraft have been grounded worldwide since mid-March following two fatal crashes within five months.

Due to the surfacing of a new safety concern, Boeing 737 MAX jets will likely be forced to remain grounded beyond the expected return-to-service date of Oc...

Article Image

Boeing reveals new flaws in 737 MAX software

The Boeing 737 Max jetliners may spend a few more months on the ground before being allowed to return to the air.

The aircraft, involved in two fatal crashes in a five-month period, has been grounded by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) since March while engineers work to update flight control software implicated in both crashes. Initially it had been hoped the issue would be resolved by this month, but Boeing says it hasn’t been that simple.

“During the FAA’s review of the 737 MAX software update and recent simulator sessions, the FAA identified an additional requirement that it has asked the company to address through the software changes that the company has been developing for the past eight months,” the company said in a statement. 

Another potential problem

The FAA said this week it found another potential problem in the 737 MAX’s computer system. According to published reports, the flaw could cause the plane to dive when it should be climbing.

Boeing says the review and process for returning the 737 MAX to passenger service are designed to result in a “thorough and comprehensive” assessment. 

“Boeing agrees with the FAA's decision and request, and is working on the required software,” the company said. 

The company believes the additional effort will result in reducing pilot workload by accounting for a potential source of uncommanded stabilizer motion. 

“Boeing will not offer the 737 MAX for certification by the FAA until we have satisfied all requirements for certification of the MAX and its safe return to service,” the statement concluded.

Airlines respond

Southwest and United airlines immediately announced extended cancellations for flights using the grounded aircraft. Southwest extended the cancellations from September 2 through October 1.

“By proactively removing the MAX from scheduled service, we can reduce last-minute flight cancellations and unexpected disruptions to our customers' travel plans,” the airline said. The limited number of customers who have already booked their travel and will be affected by our amended schedule are being notified of their re-accommodated travel according to our flexible accommodation procedures.

Southwest says the changes will remove about 150 daily flights from its schedule. United, which flies the 737 MAX 9, has canceled affected flights through September 3. About 40 to 50 United flights per day are affected.

The Boeing 737 Max jetliners may spend a few more months on the ground before being allowed to return to the air.The aircraft, involved in two fatal cr...

Article Image

New airport rankings shine the light on consumer-side pluses

If you travel out of Los Angeles, it looks like you’ve got a great airport to call your own. On the flip side, you’ve also got the worst of the bunch.

In Fodor’s new travel ranking of the best airports, Hollywood Burbank (BUR) was rated tops and Los Angeles International (LAX) was named the worst for airports on this side of the pond. For international travelers, Singapore Changi Airport (SIN) and Seoul Incheon International Airport (ICN) took first- and second-place, respectively.

Versus other travel surveys, the single most relevant element for the consumer is that Fodor’s team focused solely on categories that matter to today’s traveler -- hassle-free, affordable parking, food options, and interesting things the entire family can take in pre-flight.

"Most travel awards programs take themselves very seriously. But there are so many fun quirks and nuances to travel, as well as needs and goals that vary from person to person," said Jeremy Tarr, editorial director of Fodor's Travel. "We designed the Fodor's Travel Awards to be more inclusive, more honest, and way more fun and relevant to everyday travelers and tourists."

Who won, who lost, and why

Best U.S. Airport: Hollywood Burbank (BUR). Fodor’s reasons: an agreeable airport in a perfect location; straightforward, shenanigan-free experience; plenty of affordable parking (as low as $10 per day!) with easy, quick shuttle access to the airport; Downtown L.A., Hollywood, Santa Monica, Beverly Hills, Universal Studios, and other local attractions within easier reach than LAX; a short trip from security to the gate thanks to having only two terminals; and a Metrolink Station within walking distance of the terminals; great food options.

Next-Best U.S. Airport: Austin TX’s Austin-Bergstrom International Airport (AUS). Fodor’s reasons: the inherent eclectic nature of Austin bleeds over to the airport (“Keep Austin Weird”); foodie heaven with local faves serving up pie, barbecue, and tacos; live music (in the afternoon); the airport's Changing Exhibits program which features a rotating schedule of art, history, and culture displays; and shops that a traveler hasn’t seen at every other airport.

Worst U.S. Airport: Los Angeles International (LAX). Fodor’s reasons: Old and rundown; nightmare traffic in, around, and out; never-ending construction which poses a particularly nasty problems for Delta fliers. “Because of the construction separating the two terminals, Delta passengers show up at terminal 3, Delta’s original terminal, only to be told to head to terminal 2 to check their bags, then rush back to terminal 3 to go through security. Confused? Join the club,” wrote Fodor.

Best International Airport: Singapore Changi Airport (SIN). Fodor’s reasons: an incredible array of amenities; a world-class shopping experience; a delectable selection of international cuisine (including an array of “lite” food options); walk-through gardens, interactive exhibits, sky nets, and cool mazes for the kiddos.

Next-Best International Airport: Seoul Incheon International Airport (ICN). Fodor’s reasons: “If Changi didn’t exist, Incheon would probably be the most mind-blowing airport in the industry,” was the survey team’s consensus; great relaxation and time-killing options -- shops, cafes, seven relaxing indoor gardens, and a landslide ice-skating rink.

In all fairness…

Just like everything else in infrastructure land, airports are trying to stay on top of the customer-pleasing curve. For example, Fodor’s notes that while there may be traffic hassles at LAX for the time being, the city is trying to flip that narrative by putting in a new connector for the Crenshaw/LAX and Green Lines due in 2023.

"Airports are like living creatures – sprawling, complicated, chameleon-like things that are constantly expanding and renewing themselves," Tarr said. "What is today's best airport can quickly become next year's worst."

If you travel out of Los Angeles, it looks like you’ve got a great airport to call your own. On the flip side, you’ve also got the worst of the bunch.I...

Article Image

American Airlines extends 737 MAX cancellations

The never-ending saga of when Boeing’s 737 MAX will return to the skies continues.

On Sunday, American Airlines announced that it’s moving its flight cancellation date out another few weeks -- from August 19 to September 3. The airline feels that with summer travel well underway, the extension will allow travelers the time necessary to rearrange plans impacted by that extension.

“American Airlines remains confident that impending software updates to the Boeing 737 MAX, along with the new training elements Boeing is developing in coordination with our union partners, will lead to recertification of the aircraft soon,” the airline announced.

“We have been in continuous contact with the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of Transportation (DOT), National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) and other regulatory authorities, and we are pleased with the progress to date.”

Does anything change?

As of now, the only changes that could potentially affect a consumer’s travel plans on American are the 115 flights per day the airline says the date change will impact. Nonetheless, the airline offered some FAQs should anyone have a question.

Question: My flight was previously scheduled on a MAX. Will it be canceled?

Answer: Not all flights that were previously scheduled on a MAX will be canceled, as we plan to substitute other aircraft types. In total, approximately 115 flights will be canceled per day.

Question: My flight wasn’t scheduled to be on a MAX. Why has it been canceled?

Answer: A flight that was not scheduled as a MAX flight might be canceled to enable our team to cover a MAX route with a different aircraft. Our goal is to minimize the impact to the smallest number of customers.

Question: How will customers know if they are impacted?

Answer: American’s Reservations team will contact affected customers directly by email or telephone. Customers who booked through a travel agent will be contacted by their agency directly.

Question: My flight was canceled and I don’t want to rebook. Can I get a refund?

Answer: Yes. If a flight is canceled and a customer chooses to not be rebooked, they may request a full refund by visiting aa.com/refunds.

What’s the FAA’s position on this?

The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA)’s latest update doesn’t offer any answers to when the MAX aircraft will be officially approved to fly, again, but it has released a technical update.

  • Boeing has informed the FAA that certain 737NG and 737MAX leading edge slat tracks may have been improperly manufactured and may not meet all applicable regulatory requirements for strength and durability.

  • Following an investigation conducted by Boeing and the FAA Certificate Management Office (CMO), the FAA determined that up to 148 parts manufactured by a Boeing sub-tier supplier are affected. Boeing has identified groups of both 737NG and 737MAX airplane serial numbers on which these suspect parts may have been installed.

  • The affected parts may be susceptible to premature failure or cracks resulting from the improper manufacturing process. Although a complete failure of a leading edge slat track would not result in the loss of the aircraft, a risk remains that a failed part could lead to aircraft damage in flight.

  • The FAA will issue an Airworthiness Directive to mandate Boeing's service actions to identify and remove the discrepant parts from service. Operators of affected aircraft are required to perform this action within 10 days.

No birds of a feather, yet

As of press time, no other MAX-operated airline -- primarily domestic carriers Southwest and United -- had extended the deadline.

The never-ending saga of when Boeing’s 737 MAX will return to the skies continues.On Sunday, American Airlines announced that it’s moving its cancellat...

Article Image

FAA says some Boeing 737s may have improperly manufactured wing parts

The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) announced over the weekend that more than 300 Boeing 737 planes may have faulty wing parts.

The agency’s investigation revealed that up to 148 parts manufactured by Boeing suppliers may be “susceptible to premature failure or cracks resulting from the improper manufacturing process.”

“Although a complete failure of a leading-edge slat track would not result in the loss of the aircraft, a risk remains that a failed part could lead to aircraft damage in flight,” the FAA continued.

Boeing said it has contacted airlines that own the 737 affected jets, and the FAA has advised them to immediately inspect the aircraft to ensure their airworthiness. Boeing and the FAA, who worked together on the investigation that led to the discovery, said the slats on certain jets could develop premature cracks as a result of being manufactured improperly by a Boeing supplier.

“One batch of slat tracks with specific lot numbers produced by a supplier was found to have a potential nonconformance,” Boeing said in a statement. “If operators find the parts in question, they are to replace them with new ones before returning the airplane to service.”

Boeing said it has not been informed of any “in-service issues related to this batch of slat tracks.”

Improperly manufactured parts

Boeing and the FAA are each dealing with the aftermath of two recent 737 Max crashes, which killed 346 people and prompted authorities to ground the jets in mid-March.

The recently discovered manufacturing defect isn’t related to a flight control system on the 737 Max that has been linked to two fatal crashes. Still, Boeing says it’s “committed to supporting our customers in every way possible as they identify and replace these potentially non-conforming tracks.”

Boeing CEO Dennis Muilenburg said last week that the company knows it will need to re-earn the public’s trust.

“We know ... that the public’s confidence has been hurt by these accidents and that we have work to do to earn and re-earn the trust of the flying public and we will do that,” Muilenburg said, according to CNBC. “We are taking all actions necessary to make sure that accidents like those two ... never happened again.”

The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) announced over the weekend that more than 300 Boeing 737 planes may have faulty wing parts.The agency’s inves...

Article Image

The line between low-cost airlines and traditional carriers is getting blurry

The best bang for the consumer’s buck has encountered a little fog. A new study by J.D. Power shows that traditional airlines’ (Delta, United, American, Alaska) investment in updated fleets, better airfare value, and an improved focus on customer satisfaction has paid off handsomely. Those carriers enjoyed an 11-point uptick in Power’s new 2019 North America Airline Satisfaction Study.

Finishing first among traditional carriers is Alaska Airlines with a score of 801. Delta Air Lines came in second with a score of 788, and American Airlines ranks third with a point total of 764.

“Airlines continue to deliver on the operational side of air travel,” said Michael Taylor, Travel Intelligence Lead at J.D. Power. “New technology investments have dramatically improved the reservation and check-in process. Fleets are newer and travelers generally feel that they are getting great value for their money. These improvements have been most profound in the traditional carrier segment, where customer satisfaction has climbed considerably.”

Customer satisfaction with the low-cost carriers (e.g., Southwest, Allegiant, Frontier) took a 6-point dip, but the study still found higher overall satisfaction with these companies over traditional carriers.

“While low-cost carriers have historically had the highest levels of customer satisfaction in our study, due to a strong sense of value for money among customers, that line is starting to blur as traditional carriers improve their services and operations,” Taylor added.

JetBlue Airways’ and Southwest’s score of 817 put them in a tie for first place in the low-cost segment.

So, what is it -- better service or cheapest price?

Now that the world is in summer vacation mode, consumers have a big choice to make: pay a little more and disembark with a smile or pay a little less and walk off the plane possibly feeling a little dispirited.

In ConsumerAffairs’ ongoing reporting on the airline industry, our coverage mirrors some of what Power’s study found.

For example, in the Power survey, Alaska Airlines came in first for the 12th year in a row, adding another trophy to its list of first-place consumer ratings; on the other end, Frontier brought up the rear in customer satisfaction, which echoes another study that found the airline had nearly the same number of complaints as airlines that flew 10 times as many people.

If you’re in the midst of planning a trip, you might want to grab your pencil. Here are some of the key findings of Power’s study:

  • Tech investments in reservation and check-in systems pay off. The reservation and check-in experiences are the most satisfying portions of the airline experience, driven by investments in digital check-in technologies, self-service kiosks, and a concerted effort among airlines to improve the efficiency of the pre-flight process.

  • In-flight service remains a stumbling block. In-flight services, such as seatback entertainment, food service, and Wi-Fi continue to be the lowest-ranked part of the air traveler experience. Specific in-flight amenities that have the greatest positive effect on customer satisfaction are fresh food, seatback games, and seatback live television.

Overall, there is one area where both traditional and low-cost carriers still need a little improvement: in-flight services. “It continues to be the lowest-ranked factor in the study, as many airlines still struggle with in-flight entertainment, connectivity, in-seat power and food service,” according to Taylor.

The best bang for the consumer’s buck has encountered a little fog. A new study by J.D. Power shows that traditional airlines’ (Delta, United, American, Al...

Article Image

Boeing CEO discusses the company’s next steps

​At an investor conference on Wednesday, Boeing CEO Dennis Muilenburg said the company is aware that it will need to regain the public’s trust in the wake of two deadly crashes of 737 Max jets.

The crashes, which occurred just five months apart, prompted authorities to ground all the jets worldwide in March as a safety precaution. Since then, investigators have pointed to the possibility of faulty sensor data being a key factor in the crashes, which killed a total of 346 people.

“We know ... that the public’s confidence has been hurt by these accidents and that we have work to do to earn and re-earn the trust of the flying public and we will do that,” Muilenburg said, according to CNBC. “We are taking all actions necessary to make sure that accidents like those two ... never happened again.”

A 'defining moment' for Boeing

Describing the incidents as a “defining moment” for the company, Muilenburg said Boeing is exploring “a number of different ways we can address this issue.”

"In some cases cash may be part of the solution,” he said, referring to the possibility of compensating airlines for the ongoing grounding and the delay in new deliveries of its 737 planes.

Boeing recently submitted a software fix for the jets, which the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) is currently reviewing. The change would, in part, give pilots greater control over the system believed to have contributed to the crashes.

In the meantime, the planes still haven’t been deemed safe to fly.

“We’re committed to providing the FAA and global regulators all the information they need, and to getting it right," Muilenburg said in a statement earlier this month. "We’re making clear and steady progress and are confident that the 737 Max with updated MCAS software will be one of the safest airplanes ever to fly."

​At an investor conference on Wednesday, Boeing CEO Dennis Muilenburg said the company is aware that it will need to regain the public’s trust in the wake...

Article Image

FAA head says no firm date for returning the 737 MAX to the air

The head of the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) says there is no hard-and-fast date for the Boeing 737 MAX jetliners to return to the air.

The aircraft type, used by airlines around the world, has been grounded since March 13 following two similar crashes by Lion Air and Ethiopian Airlines, occurring five months apart.

“It takes as long as it takes,” Acting FAA Administrator Dan Elwell told the Seattle Times. “The 737 MAX will fly again when we have gone through all of the necessary analysis to determine that it is safe to do so.”

Elwell, in Dallas to meet with international aviation officials to discuss the grounded jet, held out the possibility the airplane could remain grounded for as much as a year if that’s how long it takes to address safety issues.

“I’m not tied to a timeline,” he told the newspaper.

International meeting

The meeting today will allow aviation officials to discuss what is needed before the 737 MAX can fly again. U.S. officials say they would like a concerted effort so that the plane gets clearance from all nations simultaneously.

An FAA spokesman told the newspaper that the agency has a general understanding of how Boeing plans to address the issue, but it isn’t clear on how long it will take to implement and re-certify the aircraft.

While investigations into the two crashes remain ongoing, their similarities have strongly  suggested a common cause. An angle-of-attack sensor, located on the plane’s fuselage, sends a signal to the flight control system if it determines the plane is climbing at too steep an angle, which could lead to a stall.

In both instances, investigators believe the sensor may have transmitted faulty information to the flight control system during takeoff, triggering an automated response that pointed the nose of the plane down when it should have been climbing.

Complicating summer travel

The grounding of the 737 MAX jets most likely will affect U.S. travelers through the busy summer vacation season. Three U.S. carriers -- Southwest, American, and United -- use the aircraft type and have had to replace their planes or cancel flights.

Both American and Southwest initially canceled flights using the 737 MAX aircraft through June 5, but last month they pushed the deadline back to August. In light of the FAA’s current position, even that fall-back date is beginning to look doubtful.

The FAA says Boeing’s steps to address the safety issues are taking significantly longer than initial estimates. Elwell said the manufacturer had first committed to deliver the software fix before the end of March. It withdrew that commitment after a company review found other issues that needed to be fixed.

The head of the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) says there is no hard-and-fast date for the Boeing 737 MAX jetliners to return to the air.The air...

Article Image

Airline watchers predict a record number of travelers will take to the sky this summer

Summer is looking more and more like a motherlode for the airline industry. Airlines for America (A4A), an industry trade organization, sees a record-setting 257.4 million air travelers on the horizon between June 1 and August 31, 2019 -- up more than three percent from 2018’s summer season record.

To make sure they can meet the demand, A4A reports that airlines are adding 111,000 seats per day. As to whether fares will follow that demand, A4A predicts prices will stay low, contrary to some industry watchers who think airfares will go up.

“With airlines offering low fares and reinvesting billions of dollars in their product, there’s never been a better time to fly. This summer, U.S. airlines expect travelers to take to the skies in record numbers,” said A4A Vice President and Chief Economist John Heimlich.

“Air travel is the nation’s safest form of transportation, and it is now more affordable than ever before. U.S. carriers are making airline flights more and more accessible, so it’s no surprise that more and more Americans are flying.”

Regarding affordability, Heimlich points to the fact that inflation-adjusted airfares continue to decline, with the average domestic fare dropping to $350, including those pesky government-imposed fees and taxes. That $350 price tag is the lowest average inflation-adjusted fare since the Bureau of Transportation Statistics began tabulating fares in 1995.

Airports looking for a larger piece of the travel pie

While airlines are playing nice with the consumer’s wallet, airports are not. Some airports are angling for a tax increase on anyone who boards a plane, even going as far as asking Congress for help in upping the Passenger Facility Charge (PFC), the airport tax that passengers pay every time they buy a ticket.

It’s not like airports are hurting. A4A reports that airport revenues have skyrocketed to $30 billion a year, with nearly $7 billion of that coming directly out of the traveler’s pocket.

The proposed airport tax is a thorny subject. Airlines say the $7.5 billion that airports are already sitting on is more than enough. If the PFC is doubled, a family of four will have to cough up an additional $144 for a roundtrip, one-stop domestic flight.

“Airports are flush with cash,” said A4A Senior Vice President for Legislative and Regulatory Policy Sharon Pinkerton. “They are reporting record revenues and airport construction is booming. Passengers don’t want a tax hike and airports don’t need one.”

On the other hand, airports could say that they invest some of that gravy back into consumer-centered upgrades. As an example, Dallas-Fort Worth (DFW) just announced that it’s investing $3.0 to $3.5 billion on improvements, including a new 24-gate terminal for American Airlines.

Travelers could see longer lines at security checkpoints

To accommodate President Trump’s added focus on immigration, Customs and Border Protection Officers (CBPOs) are being moved from U.S. airports to the southern border. If that keeps up, the domino effect could create long lines and wait times for fliers. It could also potentially dampen the spirit of both leisure and business travelers, which, in turn, could take a bite out of the airline industry’s revenue stream.

If A4A could get its wish, both the Trump Administration and Congress would work cooperatively on finding a way to address security concerns on the southern border without negatively impacting air transportation -- especially during a travel season as big as summer is.

A4A reminds travelers that starting October 1, 2020, everyone who goes through a screening checkpoint has to show a REAL ID-compliant driver’s license or another form of acceptable identification, such as a valid U.S. passport. At present, there are six states -- Kentucky, Pennsylvania, Oklahoma, Oregon, New Jersey, and Maine -- that haven’t met that requirement.

For more information, UpgradedPoints has developed a guide on everything a flier needs to know regarding REAL IDs.

Summer is looking more and more like a motherlode for the airline industry. Airlines for America (A4A), an industry trade organization, sees a record-setti...

Article Image

American Airlines sues its mechanics' union over alleged slowdown

American Airlines has gone to court asking a judge for a preliminary injunction against the union representing its flight mechanics.

In its complaint, the airline alleged union members are engaged in an illegal work slowdown that has resulted in delays and canceled flights. In a letter to the airline’s mechanics, David Seymour, American’s senior vice president of integrated operations, said 650 flights have been canceled, inconveniencing 125,000 customers. He claimed mechanics were responsible for 1,500 maintenance delays.

“The data shows the odds of this being random as opposed to concerted activity are less than one in one billion,” Seymour said in the letter.

American’s 15,000 mechanics are represented by two unions, the International Association of Machinists and the Transport Workers union. The two unions represented separate airline workers before American and US Air merged. An association formed from the two unions now represents American mechanics under separate contracts.

The unions didn’t immediately respond to media requests for comment.

Similar claim by Southwest

In February, Southwest Airlines declared a state of emergency and blamed a surge in flight cancellations on the airline’s mechanics. At the time Southwest had two lawsuits pending against the mechanics’ union and was involved in contract negotiations.

Southwest noted that shortly after contract talks with the union broke off, the airline experienced “an unprecedented number” of out-of-service aircraft in four specific maintenance locations despite no change in its maintenance programs or procedures.

In his letter to the American mechanics, Seymour charged the unions are engaging in illegal activities to gain leverage in the contract talks.

Consumers traveling on American, meanwhile, might consider taking advantage of the airline’s BeNotified service, an app that notifies flyers of important flight updates.

In the past, the airline placed telephone calls to travelers to notify them of their flight status but recently told customers that starting May 23, it will communicate only by email or text.

American Airlines has gone to court asking a judge for a preliminary injunction against the union representing its flight mechanics.In its complaint, t...

Article Image

Boeing announces software fix for 737 MAX jets

Boeing, which recently admitted that faulty data from simulator software was a factor in the two deadly 737 MAX crashes that occurred just five months apart, has announced that it’s made corrections to the software.

"Boeing has made corrections to the 737 MAX simulator software and has provided additional information to device operators to ensure that the simulator experience is representative across different flight conditions," Boeing spokesman Gordon Johndroe said in a statement on Saturday.

All Boeing 737 MAX aircraft have been grounded since March. Boeing said in April that it was pushing its timeline for the submission of the software patch to “ensure we take the time to get it right.”

Awaiting regulator approval

Now, Boeing says it has made changes to the software to ensure that the simulator experience adequately prepares pilots for a range of flight conditions. Moreover, the changes “will improve the simulation of force loads on the manual trim wheel," which helps airline operators manually control the plane's angle in rare instances.

“Boeing is working closely with the device manufacturers and regulators on these changes and improvements, and to ensure that customer training is not disrupted,” Johndroe said.

In addition to having developed a software update for its 737 MAX jets, Boeing said it’s also submitting a plan on pilot training to the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA).

Updated 737 MAX jets must still receive approval from regulators before they can return to service. Acting FAA administrator Daniel Elwell said that will happen "only when the FAA's analysis of the factual and technical data indicates it is safe to do so."

“We’re committed to providing the FAA and global regulators all the information they need, and to getting it right," Boeing CEO Dennis Muilenburg said in a statement. "We’re making clear and steady progress and are confident that the 737 Max with updated MCAS software will be one of the safest airplanes ever to fly."

Boeing, which recently admitted that faulty data from simulator software was a factor in the two deadly 737 MAX crashes that occurred just five months apar...

Article Image

FAA officials failed to review critical safety assessments of Boeing 737 systems

Senior officials at the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) reportedly did not review crucial safety assessments of Boeing’s 737 MAX flight-control systems prior to the fatal crashes that occurred in October and March, The Wall Street Journal reported Tuesday.

The internal review that yielded this finding also suggested that, during the MAX certification process, Boeing didn’t label the aircraft’s new stall-prevention feature as a system that could cause disastrous events if it malfunctioned. In failing to flag the feature, officials eliminated the need for more careful evaluation of the system.

Boeing CEO Dennis Muilenburg recently told the media that faulty data from a single sensor system was the likely culprit behind the two fatal crashes involving the company’s 737 MAX 8 jets. The Maneuvering Characteristics Augmentation System, or MCAS, pointed the nose of the two jets sharply downward based on faulty data from the sensor.

Sources told the Journal that the FAA’s investigation didn’t find evidence that Boeing officials deliberately provided incorrect data to the FAA, but it’s not known what safety information Boeing provided to the agency before the MAX was approved.

Boeing 737s remain grounded

All Boeing 737 MAX aircraft have been grounded since March -- the same month the company announced it would upgrade the jet’s software and provide training to pilots on the new upgrades.

Boeing says it intends to submit a fix to the FAA soon, but in early April, the company pushed the timeline for the submission of the software patch to “ensure we take the time to get it right.”

"The FAA expects to receive Boeing's final package of its software enhancement over the coming weeks for FAA approval," the agency said in a statement. "Time is needed for additional work by Boeing as the result of an ongoing review of the 737 MAX Flight Control System to ensure that Boeing has identified and appropriately addressed all pertinent issues."

Senior officials at the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) reportedly did not review crucial safety assessments of Boeing’s 737 MAX flight-control syste...

Article Image

Delta testing free in-flight Wi-Fi on select planes for two weeks

Delta Airlines on Monday kicked off a two-week trial of free Wi-Fi to all passengers on 55 of its flights. The airline says its goal is to eventually offer complimentary Wi-Fi on all domestic flights.

At the end of its initial trial on select flights, Delta hopes to have gleaned insight into how well its system can support Wi-Fi and the way passengers use it. The carrier is aware that offering Wi-Fi free of charge will lead to a significant increase in the number of customers who use it.

“Customers are accustomed to having access to free Wi-Fi during nearly every other aspect of their journey, and Delta believes it should be free when flying, too,” said Ekrem Dimbiloglu, Director of Onboard Product in a statement.

“Testing will be key to getting this highly complex program right – this takes a lot more creativity, investment and planning to bring to life than a simple flip of a switch,” Dimbiloglu said.

Travelers will be notified of availability

Delta says customer feedback will be crucial as it strives to roll out free Wi-Fi on a larger scale.

“As with any test in uncharted territory, Delta will rely heavily on customer and employee feedback to navigate how to best make free in-flight Wi-Fi a reality,” Dimbiloglu said, adding that several more test phases will likely be necessary before free Wi-Fi touches down in all cabins.

Passengers will be notified via email and a Fly Delta app push notification if their flight is among those involved in the two-week trial. Delta says passengers will be able to  “browse, email, shop, message, engage with social media and more” while using its free Wi-Fi, but they won’t be able to stream video.

Delta Airlines on Monday kicked off a two-week trial of free Wi-Fi to all passengers on 55 of its flights. The airline says its goal is to eventually offer...

Article Image

Alaska Airlines comes out on top in 2019 airline rankings

With the grounding of the 737 MAX jetliner, the ever-changing policies on pets, and companies always working an angle to make more off of ancillary fees, finding the perfect match of an airline can be complicated.

However, if you’re gearing up for summer vacation, WalletHub’s new “2019’s Best Airlines” might give you some added insight as you weigh out the best options.

WalletHub took a deep dive into 15 different metrics -- from leg room to fleet age to mishandled baggage claims -- and compared nine U.S. airlines (the six largest plus three regional carriers).

Among the six largest domestic carriers, the “most satisfactory” score went to Southwest Airlines for lowest consumer-complaint rate in 2018. “Most reliable”? That would be Delta Air Lines with the lowest rate of cancelations, delays, mishandled luggage, and denied boardings.

Here are other highlights from WalletHub’s “best of”:

Category

Airline

Best Airline Overall

Alaska Airlines

Cheapest Airline

Frontier Airlines

Most Reliable Airline

Delta Air Lines

Most Comfortable Airline

JetBlue Airways

Best Airline for Pets

ExpressJet Airlines and Envoy Air

Least Complained-About Airline

Southwest Airlines and ExpressJet Airlines

Safest Airline

Alaska Airlines

Fewest Denied Boardings

Delta Airlines

Fewest Mishandled Baggage Reports

American Airlines

What the experts would like to see

WalletHub gave its survey an interesting spin by asking a panel of aviation pundits for their take on things like trends and moves the airlines could take to enhance passengers’ comfort.

For the question “Which do you believe would be the main trend for the medium term in the airline industry?,” Yi Gao, an Associate Professor, School of Aviation and Transportation Technology, Purdue University said, “The service on-board will be more polarized. On the pointy end, more premium seats are being fitted to business class and premium economy class. At the lower end, the basic economy fare will be more common on more routes in the next few years.”

“I would not be surprised if we see an increase in small players,” added Michael Bernacchi, Professor of Marketing at the University of Detroit Mercy. “Ride-sharing in the auto industry has only recently caused great disruption and blindsided many competitors. There is a small potential for the same happenings to pop up in the airplane industry.”

“This would be impossible to manage, but that is what people thought just a few years ago when referring to strangers stepping into another stranger’s car after having loose arrangements made from a cell phone app.”

As to the question of “What would be the easiest measures to be implemented by airlines in order to increase passengers comfort?,” Daniel Rust, Assistant Professor of Transportation and Logistics at the School of Business and Economics, University of Wisconsin-Superior, said that “in the never-ending quest to generate more revenue per flight, most airlines continue to squeeze additional rows of seats into the aircraft at the expense of passenger comfort.”

“If increasing passenger comfort is the goal, then airlines should increase seat pitch as well as install more ergonomically correct seat cushions -- especially in the economy sections of new narrow-body jetliners used on longer-duration flights.”

John Mott, Associate Professor, Director Advanced Aviation Analytics Institute for Research, Purdue University, weighed in with this opinion on passenger comfort. “With the advent of LCCs (Low-Cost Carriers) and Basic Economy fares among the major carriers, we now have a greater range of services available than ever before, giving fliers the ability to select the services that best match their needs and budget.”

“While research indicates that overall passenger satisfaction has increased somewhat over the last several years, comfort in the lower service levels is not at the level that many customers desire. Increasing seat pitch in all classes of service would improve this, but doing so carries economic consequences for the airlines.”

With the grounding of the 737 MAX jetliner, the ever-changing policies on pets, and companies always working an angle to make more off of ancillary fees, f...

Article Image

The annual airline baggage review is out and things look great...for the airlines!

If you’re a traveler, take note of this figure: $28.1 billion.

Now you know why airlines charge baggage fees.

The annual baggage fee review from IdeaWorksCompany -- an airline ancillary revenue consulting firm -- and online technology and travel platform CarTrawler is out, and it’s an eye-opener.

That $28.1 billion number reflects the worldwide billing-for-baggage component. The baggage revenue stream got a nice 19.07 percent bump in 2018 according to the survey, accounting for 3.2 percent of the total global airline revenue.

“Stringent baggage fee policies are hallmarks of top revenue-performing low-cost carriers,” writes Jay Sorensen, president of IdeaWorksCompany. “The surprising development within the last two years is the implementation of bag fees by some of the world’s leading global network airlines.”

Short of Southwest Airlines and its “(two) bags fly free” promise, domestic U.S. travelers don’t get the same type of bag fee waiver that most of the Asian and Middle Eastern-based airlines give. All European-based carriers, except for Turkish Airlines, typically charge for baggage as well.

“The abundant reliance upon bag fees in Europe and North America occurs largely due to the presence of a very significant low-cost carrier industry,” Sorensen said. “Elsewhere in the world, traditional airlines include baggage benefits for all fares and have not yet adopted basic economy fare strategies.”

"One thing to look out for going forward is dynamically priced bag fees, meaning that the price will vary according to demand. Spirit is a leader in this innovation," adds Robert Silk, Airlines Editor for Travel Weekly. "Still, flyers shouldn’t forget the big picture, which is a combination of your all-in cost for flying and the service you’re buying. A higher bag fee can be offset by a lower ticket prices or a better seat and connection.”

Any way around paying baggage fees?

One of the best ways for consumers to get around the bag fee issue is to apply for a co-branded credit card. Having one of those cards will usually get a fee waiver for the first bag checked, but only in the U.S. and Canada.

As an example, UpgradedPoints reports that consumers holding the Citi/AAdvantage Executive World Elite Mastercard can get one free checked bag for you and up to eight companions on your itinerary, but it’s only valid on domestic flights.

“The sure-fire way to avoid this fee is to travel with a carry-on bag only,” advises Momondo’s Samantha Fanelli.

“However, if you simply cannot do without your checked luggage, try to pay for the bag online, as it is typically much cheaper to purchase your bag on the airline’s website rather than pay up front at the check-in counter. Be aware that maximum carry-on size varies from airline to airline, so to avoid having to check and pay for your bag in case your suitcase is too large, always make sure to check the luggage rules of your specific airline.”

One important note: Bag fees like anything else related to airline travel can change without a moment’s notice. It’s always smart to check the airline’s current policy regarding luggage and, if there’s something you don’t understand, give them a call and ask for clarification.

If you’re a traveler, take note of this figure: $28.1 billion.Now you know why airlines charge baggage fees.The annual baggage fee review from Idea...

Article Image

Plane seat manufacturer unveils ‘saddle-style’ seats for cabins

At the Aircraft Interiors Expo 2019 in Germany, Italian seat manufacturer Aviointeriors unveiled a new chair design that would put airplane passengers in a near-standing position. The concept would allow airlines to offer another option called "ultra-basic economy,” the company said.

The latest version of the company’s Skyrider “standing seat” looks similar to a bicycle seat and requires a passenger to straddle the middle section while leaning against a back support.

“Skyrider is concept foundation of new way to travel in the short-haul routes,” the company said on its website. “Innovation is driving Aviointeriors in developing a new concept of a family of economy seats.”

‘Ultra-high density’ of people

Aviointeriors says its Skyrider standing seats may appeal to airlines eyeing different ways of fitting more passengers into cabins on flights shorter than three hours. With the seats installed, airplane cabins would be able to fit in 20 percent more passengers in the same amount of space.

The manufacturer explained that the seats would allow for an “ultra-high density” of passengers in the cabin because each seat “ensures an increased upright passenger position, allowing installation of the seat at a reduced pitch.”

Additionally, the newest version of the Skyrider seat “weighs 50% less than standard economy class seats and the reduced number of components enable minimum maintenance costs,” Aviointeriors said.

So far, no airline has expressed interest in testing Aviointeriors’ standing seats.

The unveiling of the latest iteration of the company’s standing seats comes just a few weeks after Delta revealed that it’s testing reduced-recline seats in its A320 aircraft cabins. Delta insists the move is intended to increase legroom and improve the customer experience for everyone, not cram more seats into the economy cabin.

“It’s all about protecting customers’ personal space and minimizing disruptions to multitasking in-flight.” Savannah Huddleston, a company spokeswoman, said in a statement.

At the Aircraft Interiors Expo 2019 in Germany, Italian seat manufacturer Aviointeriors unveiled a new chair design that would put airplane passengers in a...

Article Image

Boeing didn’t tell a major airline an important 737 MAX 8 safety feature wasn’t working

Southwest Airlines, which owns the largest U.S. fleet of grounded Boeing 737 MAX aircraft, was unaware a standard safety feature to warn pilots about malfunctioning sensors had been turned off on those jets.

Boeing did not tell Southwest the alarm, known as a “disagree” monitor, was turned off until after the fatal Lion Air crash of a 737 MAX 8 in October, according to The Wall Street Journal. Five months later another MAX 8, operated by Ethiopian Airlines, crashed on takeoff killing all on board.

In both instances, faulty data from the angle of attack (AOA) sensor is believed to have played a role in the accidents by forcing the planes’ nose down during takeoff when the aircraft should have been climbing.

In cases like that, the disagree monitor should light up in the cockpit, alerting the crew that the plane was responding to incorrect information. The AOA disagree light is a working function on all older models of the Boeing 737.

In a statement to CNBC, Southwest said that prior to the Lion Air crash last year it had reason to believe the AOA disagree monitor was operable.

“The manual documentation presented by Boeing at Southwest’s MAX entry into service indicated the AOA Disagree Light functioned on the aircraft, similar to the Lights on our NG series,” the airline said. “After the Lion Air event, Boeing notified us that the AOA Disagree Lights were inoperable without the optional AOA Indicators on the MAX aircraft.”

After receiving that information, Southwest said it took steps to activate the AOA disagree lights on all of its 737 MAX aircraft. Southwest owns 34 of the MAX 8s while American has 24 and United operates 14.

Effect on earnings

Southwest Airlines CEO Gary Kelly cited the grounding of those 34 jets as one reason Southwest’s first-quarter earnings fell below last year’s. In addition, Kelly said the government shutdown and bitterly cold weather in the first two months of the year were a drag on earnings. Kelly said the grounding could further affect operations throughout 2019.

“We simply don't have a confirmed timeline to share with regard to when the MAX will return to service,” Kelly said in a statement. “There have been dates ranging from May to July depending on who is commenting. We have our schedule adjusted through August 5th, and if the aircraft are available to fly earlier, we will use them as additional spares to further enhance the reliability of our scheduled service.”

Southwest Airlines, which owns the largest U.S. fleet of grounded Boeing 737 MAX aircraft, was unaware a standard safety feature to warn pilots about malfu...

Article Image

United Airlines CEO takes a fresh pro-traveler stand

How about this for an opening, declarative statement: It’s not fun to fly anymore.

“Duh!” you say?

Believe it or not, United Airlines CEO Oscar Munoz agrees and says he’d like to do something about it.

“It's become so stressful,” Munoz told ABC News. “From when you leave, wherever you live, to get into traffic, to find a parking spot, to get through security.”

“Frankly, by the time you sit on one of our aircraft ... you're just pissed at the world. Improving the flying experience won't ultimately depend on what coffee or cookie I give you.”

Amen.

Munoz may be that breath of fresh air travelers are looking for. He’s not an “airline guy” per se, and he probably has more of a consumer-first attitude than his airline peers given his time in consumer services at AT&T, Coca-Cola, and PepsiCo.

He seems to be fully aware that he and United may be pushing their hopes up a hill and against the wind of their competitors who are always at the ready to slash prices, sell a couple of inches of more legroom, and charge a fortune for a dwarfish turkey sandwich.

“The competition is less about price discounts and more about the experience and the service,” Munoz said. “I think at the end of the day, it’s better for the customer.”

How little is too little?

ABC’s David Kerley asked Munoz some pointed questions that many air travelers would like to know the answer to.

When grilled about seat size -- “Have we reached the smallest (seat) we’re going to get?” -- Munoz didn’t flinch.

“I think we’re nearing a point certainly that we can’t do that anymore,” Munoz confessed.

Kerley then asked, “Why doesn’t your Wi-Fi always work?” Munoz couched his answer by saying that the technology involved is “complicated.” However, he went on to take responsibility for iffy on-board internet. “We will fix that. That’s how important Wi-Fi is to us.”

Are you a frustrated flyer?

“Somebody asked me what advice I would give to other travelers. I said empathy,” Munoz said. “I think discourse between human beings is lacking. I’ve always lived by the concept that sharing is caring. So, share with us.”

But, Munoz asks the traveler to think about how much actual control an airline has in situations like storms -- things that are out of the airlines’ hands.

“Why would I, on purpose, delay (your flight)? There’s always something that can’t go right. I tell our team that someone trusted us and said you would get me from here to here and that’s what they bought, that’s their product. Anything short of that has to be our issue.”

How about this for an opening, declarative statement: It’s not fun to fly anymore.“Duh!” you say?Believe it or not, United Airlines CEO Oscar Munoz...

Article Image

Whistleblowers raise questions about safety of Boeing 787 Dreamliner

While Boeing works to make critical safety modifications to the Boeing 737 MAX aircraft, whistleblowers claim there are issues with another new Boeing jet, the 787 Dreamliner.

Current and former employees of the Boeing plant in North Charleston, S.C., have told the New York Times shoddy production is prevalent and oversight is lacking. As a result, some of these whistleblowers expressed concern about the safety of the aircraft.

The Boeing 787 Dreamliner is a mid-size wide-body airliner that seats up to 335 passengers. Its body is constructed using composite materials, making the aircraft lighter and more fuel efficient.

The plane experienced production delays from the start, pushing its planned May 2008 debut back to late 2009. Flight testing wasn’t completed until mid-2011. It entered commercial service that same year with All Nippon Airways.

In its report, the Times cites internal emails, corporate documents, and regulatory records that it says paint a picture of a culture that values the speed at which an aircraft is built over its quality. According to the newspaper, Boeing pushed its employees to turn out Dreamliners on schedule while often giving little regard to the issues employees raised.

Company response

Kevin McAllister, Boeing’s head of commercial airplanes, issued a statement saying employees at the South Carolina plant “are producing the highest levels of quality in our history.” He also said he “stands behind the work they do.”

The Boeing 787 has had its share of problems, though none of the aircraft have crashed. In 2013, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) grounded the Dreamliner after a series of problems with onboard lithium-ion batteries.

The battery failures resulted in the release of flammable electrolytes, heat damage, and smoke on two Model 787 airplanes. The grounding caused little industry disruption since United was the online airline flying the Dreamliner, and it only has six.

Airworthiness directive

Then three years later, the FAA issued an airworthiness directive (AD) for the Boeing 787-8 and 787-9 airliners powered by General Electric (GE) GEnx-1B engines. The agency said it took the step to “reduce the likelihood of engine damage due to fan ice shedding.”

The AD revealed that a Boeing 787 Dreamliner reported an in-flight incident in which an engine fan blade rub event caused an engine to shut down while the plane cruised at 20,000 feet. The nature of the power loss did not allow the flight crew to restart the engine. The plane has only two engines, but the flight crew was able to land safely using the single working engine.

According to the Times, Qatar Airways stopped accepting aircraft from Boeing’s North Charleston plant after numerous mishaps resulted in damage to some of the planes. Among the complaints by whistleblowers are defective manufacturing and debris left on aircraft, according to the Times report.

The Boeing 737 MAX remains grounded after fatal crashes in October and last month.

While Boeing works to make critical safety modifications to the Boeing 737 MAX aircraft, whistleblowers claim there are issues with another new Boeing jet,...

Article Image

Higher airfares expected for consumers traveling this summer

Now that three of America’s biggest airlines -- and countless carriers outside of the U.S. -- have grounded their fleet of Boeing 737 MAX aircraft through the end of the summer, the domino effect of flight cancellations, fewer available seats, and a reworking of routes is expected to have an additional impact on summer airfares.

In ConsumerAffairs’ January report on the cheapest days to fly in 2019, our research found that some summer travel times -- for example, the first couple of weeks of June -- might be available at bargain prices. However, it’s a good bet that those deals are probably now off the table.

The biggest fare jumps could come from low-fare favorites like Southwest Airlines and Norwegian Air, given the size of their 737 MAX fleets. Southwest, in particular, has an elephantine loss to overcome -- a reported $150 million in lost revenue from the 34 MAX it had to ground.

Is this Boeing’s fault or simply supply and demand?

It’s easy for airlines to wag their finger at Boeing for the problems the MAX has caused. And while the MAX grounding has compounded airfares, the strength of the U.S. economy and low unemployment has also given rise to more people flying. More fliers means heftier fares because airlines adjust prices in accordance with factors such as remaining capacity on a flight and the clamor for certain routes.

“Airfare is not immune to the laws of supply-and-demand, so the 737 MAX's grounding and resulting decrease in the supply of available seats will almost certainly lead to an increase in ticket prices,” Scott Keyes of Scott’s Cheap Flights told ConsumerAffairs.

“What's important to recognize, though, is that expensive summer flights aren't Boeing's fault. To the contrary, every year summer is by far the most difficult time of year to find cheap flights. That's because there's a big surge in demand as college students, teachers, and families with kids in school all look to travel during their narrow vacation window. The best chance most travelers have to score cheap summer flights is to book in an opposite season: keeping your eye on July fares during Christmas, and looking at New Year's flights over Memorial Day.”

Other airline industry watchers agree with Keyes’ supply-and-demand take. "Airlines aren't trying to gouge customers because their Boeing 737s MAX planes are out of service,” Brian Sumers, Senior Aviation Business Editor at travel news and research site Skift told ConsumerAffairs.

“In the summer, demand is always high. Airlines respond by adding seats. They fly every plane as much as they can to try to serve rising demand. But three U.S. airlines may have airplanes out of service this summer. They'll have a smaller supply of seats, and airfares, as a result, should go up. It's just simple economics."

Now that three of America’s biggest airlines -- and countless carriers outside of the U.S. -- have grounded their fleet of Boeing 737 MAX aircraft through...

Article Image

NTSB investigating ‘near crash’ at JFK last week

The National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) is investigating an incident last week at New York’s JFK Airport that sources say was nearly America’s worst airline disaster since 2001.

American Airlines Flight 300, an Airbus A321, returned to the airport shortly after takeoff when it struck an object on the ground as it moved down the runway. On Twitter, the NTSB said the aircraft appeared to experience a roll as it moved down the runway and hit a runway distance marker with its left wingtip.

“Team of 6, consisting of an investigator in charge & technical subject matter experts in vehicle recorders, flight ops, aircraft systems & performance assigned to investigation,” the agency said in a tweet. “NTSB not planning to send investigators to the scene, but will if/when needed.”

Once airborne, the American Airlines jet, bound for Los Angeles, turned and made a safe landing at JFK. The airline said there were no injuries.

‘Close to crashing’

CBS News quotes a source close to the investigation as saying “this was as close as anyone would ever want to come to crashing.” A transcript of communication between the plane and the tower reveals the pilots experienced an uncontrolled bank to the left as the plane gathered speed down the runway. The network reported that a preliminary investigation suggests the pilots momentarily lost control of the aircraft during takeoff.

"The FAA, American Airlines, and the Allied Pilots Association will be parties to the NTSB's investigation, and the BEA of France has designated an Accredited Representative as the state of design and manufacture of the airplane with Airbus as their technical advisor."

The incident is getting intense scrutiny in the wake of two recent crashes involving the new Boeing 737 MAX 8 aircraft. The crashes, coming five months apart in Indonesia and Ethiopia, occurred shortly after takeoff and resulted in the grounding of all 737 MAX aircraft.

The NTSB has requested data from American Airlines Flight 300 and will try to determine why the plane struck a runway sign and light pole, the force of which bent a portion of the aircraft’s wing.

U.S. crashes have become rare

While airline crashes were once not uncommon, they have become a rarity in the U.S. over the last two decades. On November 12, 2001, American Airlines Flight 587 crashed on takeoff from JFK, killing 265 people.

On August 27, 2006, Comair Flight 5191, a small regional jet, crashed on takeoff from Lexington, Ky., killing 50 passengers and crew.

On February 12, 2009, Colgan Air flight 3407, a commuter jet operated by Continental, crashed in a snowstorm near Buffalo, N.Y., killing 50 people.

The National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) is investigating an incident last week at New York’s JFK Airport that sources say was nearly America’s wors...

Article Image

Airports increasingly look to become kid-friendly

Every traveler knows the hoops they have to jump through these days when making it through the maze at an airport. That task can become even more perplexing when you have a child in tow, especially if they have allergies or you have an infant that requires a car seat, stroller, and a duffle bag of wipes, diapers, and bottles.

“Airports can be quite tricky for families,” writes Christy Rodriguez in TravelPoints’ new rankings of America’s 10 most kid-friendly airports. “They often suggest you arrive hours ahead of your departure, require you to stand in long lines during security checks, and make things like breastfeeding more challenging.”

In a recent TravelPoints study, researchers examined the 50 busiest airports by total passenger boardings in the U.S. for 2018. Since there are no federal regulations governing how airports cater to children, the study created a point system based on the quality and number of kid-friendly activities offered at each airport, as well as free access to Wi-Fi since being connected to the internet can keep a child occupied for hours. Family-friendly lounges were also given points.

If you’re a new mom, you might be asking “But, what about nursing stations?,” and that’s a valid question. The reason those weren’t included is airports are now required to cater to breastfeeding moms as part of the recently enacted Friendly Airports for Mother’s Act. That act requires all U.S. large- and medium-sized airports to provide a “clean, private, non-bathroom space in each terminal for the expression of breast milk.”

The Top 10

After TravelPoints crunched all the various metrics, here are the airports that made their way onto the study’s Top 10 list:

  1. Boston Logan International (BOS). The biggest draws include: “Kidsport” play areas in 3 terminals with a baggage claim slide, a climbable airplane, and a replica built of the airport’s control tower. Logan also placed its play areas stationed close to bathrooms for those much needed potty breaks. For moms who need a place to sit and calm their child, there are rocking chairs throughout the airport. And for those seeing free Wi-Fi and charging stations, Boston thinks of itself as a “wired airport” and goes the extra mile to make those technical pluses available throughout the airport.

  2. Portland International (PDX). Portland International Airport’s high ranking comes as no surprise for those who’ve passed through. The airport was given top marks for terminal facilities, accessibility, food options, and entertainment. While the airport doesn’t have the same number of play areas as Boston Logan, it does have two in the pre-security areas, which include small climbing structures, a toy telescope to watch planes out on the tarmac, and two post-security areas with Lego tables and foam play elements.

  3. San Francisco International (SFO). You would expect an airport close to Silicon Valley to have plenty of electronic gadgets, and San Francisco doesn’t fail in that area. The airport sports Kids’ Spots located post-security in all terminals, which feature unique, interactive displays. One particular Kids’ Spot comes complete with a weather-themed play area with crawling equipment and the interactive “Plasma Wall”, where colorful shapes move around in response to the sounds the kids make.

    While San Francisco didn’t make the list of most pet-friendly airports, it does have its own “Wag Brigade,” where trained dogs are brought to the terminals in hopes of some special attention from travelers.

  4. Chicago O’Hare (ORD). If you’ve flown cross-country on United or American, it’s a safe bet that you’ve changed planes at O’Hare. If you have the time between flights, O’Hare’s “Kids on the Fly” exhibit in Terminal 2 gives children the space to crawl around and inspect an airplane, a control tower, and a helicopter model. If the kiddos are more of the Lego-loving crowd, there’s plenty of mini-figs for them to enjoy, too.

    In O’Hare’s other terminals, kids can also see a 72-foot long Brachiosaurus model, a replica of a WWII fighter plane, and what’s billed as the world’s first airport aeroponic garden with more than 1,000 plants and sustainability tips.

  5. Atlanta’s Hartsfield-Jackson (ATL). Not only is Hartsfield the busiest airport in the world, it’s also carved out some magical space for the young ones. If your child needs to blow off some of that pent-up energy, the airport has two play areas with slides, an art program featuring a 20-piece Zimbabwean stone sculpture, and a fully assembled skeleton of the Chinese Yangchuanosaurus, a Jurassic period dinosaur.

Rounding out the Top 10 kid-friendly airports are Detroit Metropolitan Wayne County (DTW), home to a 39-foot wide water feature that was inspired by the lines of a flight map; Washington D.C.’s Dulles International Airport (IAD) which has a wow-inducing kids’ play area developed by NASA; Philadelphia International Airport (PHL) which has caricaturists and story time; San Jose International Airport (SJC), where children can listen on the phone connected to live communications between the control tower and pilots; and Nashville International Airport (BNA) which features live musical performances from a variety of genres.

Every traveler knows the hoops they have to jump through these days when making it through the maze at an airport. That task can become even more perplexin...

Article Image

American and Southwest Airlines extend Boeing 737 MAX flight cancellations to August

The Boeing 737 MAX saga continues.

The Federal Aviation Commission (FAA) held a closed-door meeting at its headquarters on Friday, and representatives from Southwest Airlines, American Airlines, and United Airlines -- the three domestic carriers that own Boeing 737-MAX aircraft -- were reportedly in attendance, according to Fox Business News.

With apparently no guarantee of safety in place from Boeing or the FAA, American and Southwest Airlines have both extended their current June 5 deadline regarding cancelled 737 MAX cancellations to August.

“U.S. airlines and the pilot unions want to know how the work on this software fix for the 737 MAX is progressing,” Wall Street Journal aviation reporter Andrew Tangel told Fox News.

“Ultimately, the airlines want to make sure that the airplane is going to be safe to fly and it can get passengers on these planes, and the pilots want the same thing. They’re not going to fly the plane if they’re not satisfied the plane is safe.”

A safe summer is now the focus

Although the companies are extending flight cancellations involving the Boeing 737 MAX, officials say they’re confident that a solution will be presented before then.

“Based upon our ongoing work with the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and Boeing, we are highly confident that the MAX will be recertified prior to this time,” American’s Chairman and CEO Doug Parker and President Robert Isom wrote to company employees.

“By extending our cancellations through the summer, we can plan more reliably for the peak travel season and provide confidence to our customers and team members when it comes to their travel plans. Once the MAX is recertified, we anticipate bringing our MAX aircraft back on line as spares to supplement our operation as needed during the summer.”

The summer flying season is a key element not only for American but for every airline. Family and class reunions, trips overseas, and vacations could have been put in limbo if the planned June date couldn’t be met. This way, airlines can cancel the MAX-related flights and get those passengers on other flights. In American’s situation, that’s approximately 115 flights per day -- about 1.5 percent of American’s total daily flying -- that will be canceled through August 19.

Southwest also announced a modified schedule which will now run through August 5, 2019.

“Through a lens of impacting the fewest travelers, we have removed an average [of] 160 flights a day across the peak summer flight schedule, when Southwest typically operates 4200+ departures a day,” a Southwest spokesperson told ConsumerAffairs.

In an email to the airlines’ customers, Southwest President Tom Nealon doubled down on the importance of making sure the airline can “add further stability for Customers booking their summer travel.”

“The limited number of Customers, who have already booked their travel and will be affected by this amended schedule, are being proactively notified so that we can re-accommodate their flight plans well in advance of their travel date,” Nealon said.

“While the vast majority of our Customers' itineraries have remained unaffected, flight schedule changes have inconvenienced some of our valued Customers, and, for that, I offer my sincerest apologies. The proactive move allows us to accommodate Customers, eliminate last-minute surprises, and focus on the integrity of a right-sized operation for the number of aircraft available to the airline.”

A Southwest spokesperson told ConsumerAffairs that the airline is moving away from notifying passengers only days out to a more plan-friendly weeks out in hopes of giving travelers more breathing room to modify their travel arrangements. Southwest says that those notices “also share dedicated resources to facilitate further modifications within our reaccommodation practices.”

And United? United Airlines currently has no plans to follow suit; instead, it seems the company will wait and see if solutions are forthcoming. A United spokesperson told ConsumerAffairs that its current contingency plan is in place through the end of May.

“For our April schedule, we currently expect to have approximately 130 cancellations related to the MAX. By using larger aircraft on those routes, we have been able to protect our customers’ original itineraries by using other aircraft to cover almost all of the MAX flights,” United said.

The Boeing 737 MAX saga continues.The Federal Aviation Commission (FAA) held a closed-door meeting at its headquarters on Friday, and representatives f...

Article Image

Delta is limiting how far back seats will recline

You board your flight, stow your gear in the overhead bin, take your seat, and pick up a magazine to read on the flight.

Suddenly, the seat back in front of you comes back and stops six inches from your face as the passenger sitting in it decides to get comfortable.

Delta Airlines is betting that no passengers like that intrusion into their personal space and will eventually embrace new limits the airline is placing on how far a seat will recline.

Since there are two kinds of passengers -- those who want to recline in their seats and those who resent it when a seat reclines into their space -- Delta is taking sides. It’s siding with the people who don’t like it and is betting that recliners will come to see that the policy is good for just about everyone.

Testing on Airbus A320 jets

The airline is going to test its new policy first on its Airbus A320 jets, a short-to-medium range narrow-bodied plane. It is cutting the coach seat recline in half, stopping the seat at two inches from the top. In first class, the seat recline is going down a couple of inches to 3.5 inches.

Delta insists it is not making the change to squeeze in another row of seats. It says the move will increase legroom and improve the customer experience for everyone. Travel website The Points Guy quotes Ekrem Dimbiloglu, Delta’s director of onboard product and customer experience, as saying Delta is not adding “a single seat” to the A320.

We found evidence that the debate over reclining a seat on an airliner has divided passengers for at least 12 years. In a 2007 post to an airline forum on TripAdvisor “Lexigirl” wrote that she was just learning that some of her fellow passengers were unhappy when she reclined her seat.

Both sides of the issue

“I have traveled a lot, and I always found it more comfortable to recline, and never realized this might be an issue,” she wrote. “After all, the seats are made to recline for a reason, Should I have to sit straight up for long periods of time because some tall person in back of me doesn't like me to recline?”

But last month, a ConsumerAffairs reader -- Charles, from Taneyville, Mo., wrote that he was very uncomfortable on an Allegiant Air flight, and that seat recliners didn’t help.

“The seats were too close to recline seats,” Charles wrote in a ConsumerAffairs post. “I felt like I was back in school riding a school bus. Loud and cramped.”

Interviewed in Time Magazine, travel expert Elaine Swann suggests quietly and discreetly asking the passenger in front of you if they could move up a bit, since the back of their seat is pressing against you. But she says it doesn’t always work.

Airline seat pitch, the distance between rows of seats, varies by aircraft and airline. It’s an important factor in how intrusive a reclining seat is. You can check out the seat pitch for individual airlines here.

You board your flight, stow your gear in the overhead bin, take your seat, and pick up a magazine to read on the flight.Suddenly, the seat back in fron...

Article Image

American Airlines extends the cancellation of its Boeing 737 MAX flights

With no guaranteed fix in place to get the Boeing 737 MAX back in the skies anytime soon, American Airlines has decided to play it safe and extend all related flight cancellations through June 5.

American -- like Southwest and United -- has had to sit on its hands since March 14 when the United States grounded all MAX-driven flights after two MAX aircraft crashes in five months.

The take-charge positions of airlines, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), the Department of Transportation (DOT), the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB), and Boeing to find a solid, long-lasting solution is good for everybody, especially the consumer whose lives and loyalty are at stake.

“In an effort to provide more certainty and avoid last minute flight disruptions, American has extended cancellations through June 5,” American wrote in a news release. “This will result in the cancellation of approximately 90 flights each day based on our current schedule. By proactively canceling these flights, we are able to provide better service to our customers with availability and rebooking options.”

Do you have an upcoming reservation on American?

American is taking a proactive approach to try and cover all the bases for anyone booked on one of its flights between now and June 5. Here’s everything the airline feels the customer needs to guide them through this extension:

Question: My flight was previously scheduled on a MAX. Will it be canceled?

Answer: Not all flights that were previously scheduled on a MAX will be canceled, as American plans to substitute other aircraft types. In total, approximately 90 flights will be canceled per day.

Question: My flight wasn’t scheduled to be on a MAX. Why has it been canceled?

Answer: A flight that was not scheduled as a MAX flight might be canceled to enable American’s team to cover a MAX route with a different aircraft. The company’s goal is to minimize the impact to the smallest number of customers.

Question: How will customers know if they are impacted?

Answer: American’s Reservations team will contact affected customers directly by email or telephone. Customers who booked through a travel agent will be contacted by their agency directly.

Question: My flight was canceled and I don’t want to rebook. Can I get a refund?

Answer: Yes. If a flight is canceled and a customer chooses to not be rebooked, they may request a full refund by visiting aa.com/refunds.

Any update from the other airlines involved?

At press time, neither United or Southwest had announced an extension similar to American’s.

ConsumerAffairs has reached out to both airlines and will update our readers as soon as we hear something.

-----

Update: 4/8/19, 12:00 p.m. (EST)
In a statement to ConsumerAffairs, a United Airlines representative said that the company is "working diligently to reduce any customer impacts through use of alternate aircraft and rebooking and [has] contingency plans through June 05."

Update: 4/8/19, 1:15 p.m. (EST)

In a separate statement to ConsumerAffairs, Southwest Airlines said that it will also be revising its schedule through June 7. Below is the full statement given by a representative.

"Today, Southwest’s flight schedule was revised through June 7 in an effort to support our Customers by reducing last-minute trip disruptions and cancelations which have been caused by the removal of the Boeing 737 MAX 8 from service for longer than anticipated. By cancelling flights through June 7 now, we can offer rebooking options sooner so that affected Customers can maintain confidence in their travel plans," said Southwest representative Brian Parrish.

"Customers affected by flight changes are being proactively notified. We sincerely appreciate our Customers’ patience and understanding regarding these schedule changes, and we look forward to restoring the level of reliability and on-time performance that our Customers and Employees deserve and expect from Southwest."

Parrish also noted that affected MAX 8 aircraft represent less than 5 percent of Southwest's entire fleet.

With no guaranteed fix in place to get the Boeing 737 MAX back in the skies anytime soon, American Airlines has decided to play it safe and extend all rela...

Article Image

Boeing: Faulty data likely caused 737 MAX crashes

Boeing CEO Dennis Muilenburg says he’s seen enough information to conclude that faulty data from an angle-of-attack sensor played a role in two recent crashes of the company’s new jet, the 737 MAX 8.

A Lion Air jet crashed in October. An Ethiopian Airlines plane crashed last month. Both jets went down shortly after takeoff, killing a total of 346 people. Both crashes are still under investigation but in a statement, the Boeing executive acknowledged the growing consensus.

“With the release of the preliminary report of the Ethiopian Airlines flight 302 accident investigation it’s apparent that in both flights the Maneuvering Characteristics Augmentation System, known as MCAS, activated in response to erroneous angle-of-attack information,” Muilenberg said.

The MCAS is an automated system that reads information from a small angle-of-attack sensor located on the side of the aircraft. If the sensor detects the plane is rising at too steep an angle it automatically pushes the nose of the aircraft down, to prevent it from stalling and dropping from the sky.

Faulty data can be deadly

But if the information is wrong, then the MCAS would push the plane into a dive at low altitude during takeoff when it is supposed to be climbing. Though their final report has yet to be issued, investigators in both accidents think that could have happened.

Mullenberg’s statement followed a briefing by Ethiopian Transport Minister Dagmawit Moges, who said a preliminary investigation had ruled out pilot error as a cause of the accident. Earlier, he said the flight crew followed proper emergency steps as the pilots tried to regain control of the aircraft.

Chain of events

“The history of our industry shows most accidents are caused by a chain of events,” Mullenberg said. “This again is the case here, and we know we can break one of those chain links in these two accidents. As pilots have told us, erroneous activation of the MCAS function can add to what is already a high workload environment. It’s our responsibility to eliminate this risk. We own it and we know how to do it.”

Mullenberg said Boeing is taking a “comprehensive, disciplined approach” and will take all the time that is necessary to properly update the 737 MAX’s flight control software. He said the company is nearing the end of that process and expects to have the new software certified and implemented on the 737 MAX fleet in the weeks ahead.

In the meantime, all Boeing 737 MAX aircraft remain grounded.

Boeing CEO Dennis Muilenburg says he’s seen enough information to conclude that faulty data from an angle-of-attack sensor played a role in two recent cras...

Article Image

737 MAX 8 crash probes still focused on key sensor

The investigation into one of two recent crashes of Boeing 737 MAX jetliners has shifted to a Florida aircraft maintenance facility.

Citing documents from the investigation of last October’s Lion Air crash, Bloomberg News reports the ill-fated jet was serviced at XTRA Aerospace Inc., in Miramar, Florida. The documents reportedly show that while there, technicians worked on the plane’s angle-of-attack sensor.

That’s significant because the sensor is suspected of sending faulty signals to a flight control system designed to force the nose of the plane down to prevent a stall. If the Maneuvering Characteristics Augmentation System, or MCAS, engages while a plane is taking off, it can be catastrophic.

Two fatal crashes in five months

All 189 people aboard the Lion Air jet died when the plane crashed into the Java Sea. Five months later, there were no survivors when an Ethiopian Airlines 737 Max jet crashed shortly after takeoff. The investigations into both crashes are still underway. Bloomberg reports there is no evidence the Florida repair facility worked on the Ethiopian jet.

Meanwhile, Ethiopian investigators have reportedly concluded the pilots of the Ethiopian jet followed Boeing’s emergency steps to disable the MACS, but to no avail. The Wall Street Journal reports details of the flight crew’s action were revealed by the plane’s data recorder. The recorder shows the pilots re-engaged the MACS before the jet crashed, killing 157 people.

Whistleblowers

In Washington, lawmakers are examining how commercial aircraft are inspected. A whistleblower has reportedly told the Senate Commerce Committee that inspectors assigned to the Boeing 737 MAX aircraft did not receive proper training.

In a letter to the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Sen.Roger Wicker (R-Miss.) the committee’s chairman, said “multiple” whistleblowers have alleged that some FAA inspectors have lacked valid certification.

Boeing 737 MAX aircraft remain grounded while the company works on a software fix. Bloomberg reports producing the update is taking longer than expected.

The grounding and testing is affecting three U.S.-based airlines -- Southwest, American, and United. Southwest owns 34 MAX 8 aircraft and American has 24 MAX 8s. United owns 14 of the larger 737 MAX 9 aircraft.

The investigation into one of two recent crashes of Boeing 737 MAX jetliners has shifted to a Florida aircraft maintenance facility.Citing documents fr...

Article Image

Software issue grounds JetBlue, American, Southwest, United, Alaska, and Delta flights

This is not an April Fool’s hoax.

A software outage grounded a host of domestic airlines on Monday morning, including JetBlue, American, Southwest, United, Alaska, and Delta, according to reports.

The software is a flight deck application hosted by a company called AeroData. “The last application used by pilots before the aircraft entry door is closed,” is how AeroData's application was described by software partner VMWare.

It’s unknown exactly how many planes were impacted by the issue, but the Federal Aviation Administration’s (FAA) Greg Martin told The Washington Post that the effect was “minimal.” AeroData says that “approximately 21,000 flights per day worldwide” are reliant on its service.

If you’re flying Monday

By 11 a.m. (EST), ConsumerAffairs was starting to see some reports that AeroData’s servers were back online.

Nonetheless, with airlines having to play catch-up, travelers would be smart to contact carriers directly to see if any flight rescheduling will impact other planned departures later in the day. ConsumerAffairs reached out to several of the impacted carriers but had not heard back from any by press time. However, we noticed that several of the airlines were tweeting updates about the developing situation.

“The company knows first-hand that just five minutes of system downtime can result in more than 100 delayed flights, a significant loss of revenue, and damage to its customers’ reputations,” wrote VMWare.

Given the unpleasant task of already having to weather the recent Boeing 737 MAX-8 issues, it’s a safe bet American, Southwest, and United were none too happy with AeroData’s mistake. ConsumerAffairs will keep an eye on this story to see how it impacts the traveler. Stay tuned... and enjoy the peanuts.

-----

Update: 11:55 a.m. (EST), 4/1/19

In an emailed statement to ConsumerAffairs, Delta said it doesn't believe that it will have to cancel any flights due to this issue. However, it offers advice for consumers who may be flying today.

“A brief third-party technology issue that prevented some Delta Connection flights from being dispatched on time this morning has been resolved. No cancellations are expected due to the issue and our teams are working to resolve some resulting delays," the company said. "We apologize to customers for any inconvenience. If you’re scheduled on a flight departing soon, please check the status of your flight via the Fly Delta Mobile App or Delta.com. ”

This is not an April Fool’s hoax.A software outage grounded a host of domestic airlines on Monday morning, including JetBlue, American, Southwest, Unit...

Article Image

American Airlines has the worst rate of passenger wheelchair criticism

People flying on major airlines made 681 charges in January about mishandled wheelchairs or scooters, according to new disclosures that the airline industry made to the Department of Transportation (DOT).

Federal regulations have long required that airlines publicly disclose lost luggage, injured or killed pets, and on-time performance on a monthly basis. But charges of lost or damaged custom wheelchairs, which airlines often stow away in the cargo hold of planes, weren’t part of those reporting requirements until recently.

In December, changes made by the Obama administration to address wheelchair grievances from fliers finally went into effect.

Newly released figures from the DOT show that passengers made 701 wheelchair grievances in December and 681 grievances in January, the most recent month for which data is available.

American Airlines receives most gripes

In January, American Airlines received 167 grievances related to mishandled wheelchairs, out of a total of 2,835 wheelchairs it transported. That represents a gripe rate of 5.89 percent, the highest among major airlines.

The figure is slightly better than December, when American Airlines reported a rate of 7.22 percent.

“Our goal is to ensure customers of all abilities have a positive travel experience and we strive to do better every day,” American Airlines spokesman Shannon Gilson tells ConsumerAffairs in a statement. “We’ve taken a number of steps to meet the new reporting requirements and continue to improve our processes to ensure our team members have the tools they need to properly handle and track wheelchairs and assistive devices.”

Southwest Airlines came in second for wheelchair mishandling problems in January, with 4.09 percent of fliers who traveled with wheelchairs or scooters reporting a problem.

Delta had the lowest rate, reporting only 107 gripes out of 12,670 wheelchairs or scooters it transported.

Wheelchair users say that air travel has become more difficult for the disabled in an era of shrinking seats and overbooking. One recent government audit found that disability-related issues on airlines doubled between 2005 and 2015.

People flying on major airlines made 681 charges in January about mishandled wheelchairs or scooters, according to new disclosures that the airline indu...

Article Image

Budget airline Wow Air ceases operations, cancels all flights

Icelandic airline Wow Air, formerly known for its cheap trans-Atlantic fares, has suddenly shut down. Passengers have been advised to book new flights on other airlines.

“Wow Air has ceased operation. All Wow Air flights have been canceled,” the airline said in a statement posted to its website on Thursday. Wow Air said affected travelers may be able to get reduced fares from other airlines.

“Some airlines may offer flights at a reduced rate, so-called rescue fares, in light of the circumstances. Information on those airlines will be published, when it becomes available,” the carrier said.

The airline said some passengers may be eligible for compensation.

“Passengers who may have bought travel protection, or those passengers whose credit card terms may include such protection, may be entitled to claim compensation and assistance due to delays or travel disruption,” the statement continued. The airline added that “such compensation is often limited.”

Financial struggles

Wow Air, which began operations in 2012, had for the past six months been in negotiations to be bought by rival Icelandair and later by Indigo Partners. However, both deals fell through.

Prior to kicking off its effort to find a buyer, the budget airline was struggling financially. In January, the airline announced plans to pare down its number of U.S. destinations to just four in an effort to get “back to the basics” and “grow again as a purebred low-cost airline.”

The airline’s sudden collapse on Thursday has left thousands of passengers stranded.

Icelandic airline Wow Air, formerly known for its cheap trans-Atlantic fares, has suddenly shut down. Passengers have been advised to book new flights on o...

Article Image

Boeing reveals fixes for 737 Max planes

On Wednesday, Boeing revealed a series of steps it is taking to make its 737 Max airplanes safer. Among the changes are software updates to the aircrafts’ Maneuvering Characteristics Augmentation System (MCAS), new flight control displays, and additional training for pilots.

Below is a list of the additional layers of protection that Boeing is rolling out:

  • Flight control systems will now compare inputs from both angle of attack (AOA) sensors on the outside of planes. If the sensors disagree by 5.5 degrees or more with the flaps retracted, MCAS will not activate. An indicator on the flight deck display will alert pilots.

  • If MCAS is activated in non-normal conditions, it will provide one input for each elevated AOA event.

  • MCAS can never command more stabilizer input than can be counteracted by the flight crew pulling back on the column. The pilots will continue to always have the ability to override MCAS and manually control the airplane.

The software updates are meant to stop planes from unexpectedly nose diving when the AOA sensors detect too steep of an angle of ascent. Experts have speculated that this issue is what led to the crash of an Ethiopian Airlines flight earlier this month and a Lion Air crash that occurred in October.

Improving safety

The new safety updates provide a much-needed reprieve for Boeing, which has faced backlash in recent weeks. In addition to the two fatal crashes, one Boeing 737 Max aircraft was forced to make an emergency landing earlier this week due to an engine problem.

CNBC reports that news of the updates caused a 1 percent jump in the company’s stock in yesterday’s trading. The company is assuring the public that the steps it has taken are in coordination with airline regulators.

“The software was put through hundreds of hours of analysis, laboratory testing, verification in a simulator and two test flights, including an in-flight certification test with Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) representatives on board as observers,” the company said.

“These updates reduce the crew’s workload in non-normal flight situations and prevent erroneous data from causing MCAS activation. We continue to work with the FAA and other regulatory agencies on the certification of the software update.”

On Wednesday, Boeing revealed a series of steps it is taking to make its 737 Max airplanes safer. Among the changes are software updates to the aircrafts’...

Article Image

In-flight issue causes Boeing 737 Max plane to make emergency landing

Following the recent crash of another aircraft of the same model, a Southwest Boeing 737 Max 8 was forced to make an emergency landing in Orlando on Tuesday after reporting an in-air problem.

Southwest said that the flight was forced to return to Orlando International Airport on Tuesday afternoon due to a “performance issue with one of the engines shortly after takeoff.” This differed from the previous in-flight incidents, which were linked to an automated system which caused the planes to nosedive.

The airline carrier says that the plane was not carrying any passengers, as all flights involving the Boeing 737 Max 8 have been grounded due to an emergency order issued earlier this month by the U.S. Department of Transportation.

More trouble for Boeing

The in-flight issue is likely to create another headache for Boeing. Earlier this month, one of its 737 Max 8 aircraft flying for Ethiopian Airlines experienced a tragic crash in which 157 people on board were killed. The accident happened only five months after another aircraft of the same model crashed into the Java Sea.

Regulators speculate that the crashes can be attributed to one of the monitors on the outside of the planes that monitors the angle of ascent. If the monitor determines that the plane is climbing too steeply, it triggers a correction that brings the nose of the plane back down.

Several federal agencies, including the FBI, are now investigating the certification process for the planes and whether or not proper protocols were followed. Reports indicate that regulators are also looking into how Boeing marketed the aircraft and what kind of training and information it gave to pilots.

Following the recent crash of another aircraft of the same model, a Southwest Boeing 737 Max 8 was forced to make an emergency landing in Orlando on Tuesda...

Article Image

FBI reportedly investigating how the FAA certified the Boeing 737 Max 8

Various media reports say the FBI has entered the investigation of how the Boeing 737 Max 8 jet was certified by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). Two of the new jets crashed within the last five months killing almost 400 people.

The Transportation Department reportedly opened an investigation into the aircraft’s approval process following last October’s crash of a Lion Air jet. Multiple sources report the U.S. Justice Department has now entered the picture and has issued several subpoenas.

CNN now reports that federal investigators are focusing on how Boeing marketed the new aircraft and what kind of training and information it provided to pilots. At the heart of the investigation, the government is said to be looking at the process Boeing used to certify the aircraft as safe and how the FAA handled that information.

The Justice Department does not comment on open investigations, and a spokesman for Boeing said it does not comment on potential legal matters.

The crashes

In October, a Lion Air Boeing 737 Max 8 crashed into the Java Sea after the flight crew reportedly struggled in vain to keep the plane from going into a steep drive. In early March, an Ethiopian Airlines 737 Max 8 crashed shortly after takeoff and the initial investigation pointed to “similarities” to the Lion Air crash.

In the Lion Air crash, the ongoing investigation has focused on a sensor located on the outside of the aircraft that monitors the plane’s angle of attack. If it determines the angle is too steep and could cause the craft to stall, it triggers an automated function that brings down the nose of the plane.

Investigators have speculated that If the sensor transmitted faulty data during the plane’s takeoff, the automatic software called the Maneuvering Characteristics Augmentation System (MCAS) could force the nose of the plane down at a critical time when it should be climbing.

Nearly crashed the day before

It’s now been reported that the Lion Air jet that crashed in October very nearly crashed the day before. Bloomberg News quotes Indonesian sources as saying an off-duty pilot riding in the jump seat of the Lion Air Max 8 the day before told the flight crew how to disable the MCAS when the aircraft went into a steep dive.

The next day, the same aircraft with a different crew reportedly experienced the same problem. But without the off-duty pilot to offer advice, the plane crashed, killing 189 people.

Retired USAir pilot Capt. Chesley “Sully” Sullenberger,” who landed his crippled plane on the Hudson River after it was struck by geese, has weighed in on the issue, blasting both Boeing and the FAA in an op-ed.

“Our credibility as leaders in aviation is being damaged,” Sullenberger wrote. “Boeing and the FAA have been found wanting in this ugly saga that began years ago but has come home to roost with two terrible fatal crashes, with no survivors, in less than five months, on a new airplane type, the Boeing 737 Max 8, something that is unprecedented in modern aviation history.”

Sullenberger said the FAA has not been given a budget that allows it appropriate oversight of what he called a rapidly growing global aviation industry.

Various media reports say the FBI has entered the investigation of how the Boeing 737 Max 8 jet was certified by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA)....

Article Image

Fliers weigh in on the best and worst in air travel

American fliers have weighed in on their favorite airlines, and Delta, Alaska, and Southwest Airlines rule the roost, according to a new study by ThePointsGuy (TPG). Bringing up the rear was Allegiant, Frontier, and Spirit.

Taking into account everything from on-time arrivals to the number of cities served, TPG found some benchmarks that consumers might find interesting the next time they book a flight.

Winners and losers

Overall: Delta captured first place overall with a remarkable 92.7 percent on-time arrival score, the largest network of lounges, fewest people bumped, and the largest number of cities served.

On the flip side? Discount carrier Frontier, thanks to its paltry on-time record, fell to last place. The carrier also scored low due to run-of-the-mill cabin features, a tendency to bump paying passengers, and a high rate of customer complaints.

Affordability: Combing through airline financials, websites, Department of Transportation files, fees, customer ratings, and other metrics, the formula TPG created found that Spirit Airlines had the best ratio of fare cost-per-mile. “On average, Spirit passengers only paid about $1 per mile flown in base fare for every $2.60 that Delta flyers paid,” was TPG’s analysis. “If you can avoid the plethora of fees, Spirit can be a bargain.”

Regarding ancillary fees -- those nasty charges for every little thing the passenger wants to bring or do onboard -- Southwest Airlines got the prize for not penny-pinching its passengers. Of course, free is hard to beat, and with Southwest allowing fliers to check two bags for free and not charging to change a flight, it was pretty much a shoo-in in that metric.

IIf fees are a turn-off, you might want to avoid Hawaiian Air. The airline charges an acceptable $30 for a checked bag but an astronomic $300 for flight changes, making it the study’s worst value for fees. You may also want to double-check your wishlist against what Delta is going to charge you for seatback screens, extra legroom, and the like.

On-Time Performance: Hawaiian Airlines had the fewest delayed flights or cancellations and Frontier had the most delays -- an eye-popping 24.6 percent of its flights.

Comfort: It makes economic sense that fare price and comfort go hand-in-hand. But for fliers who concern themselves with legroom and free Wi-Fi, here’s the takeaways:

  • JetBlue and Southwest tied for the most generous seat pitch in coach, at 32.9 inches on average, while Spirit’s 28-inch average seat pitch is the least-giving.

  • Hawaiian and Frontier have the widest seats on average at 18 inches. Alaska has the narrowest seats at 17 inches.

  • Alaska is the only airline that has power outlets at every seat.

  • JetBlue wins the Wi-Fi battle with free Wi-Fi on every plane.

Customer Satisfaction: TPG took into account the number of passenger complaints against each airline filed with the DOT and the number of lost luggage complaints. The winner? Southwest Airlines.

ConsumerAffairs reviewers give Southwest positive ratings, and TPG’s survey takers seem to agree.

“Southwest has a reputation for great service and loyal customers, and it showed,” wrote TPG. “Frontier, on the other hand, racked up nearly the same number of complaints as airlines that flew 10 times as many people. If you check bags, you have the most reason to worry if flying American, while Spirit flyers can probably rest easy.”

On the opposite end of the satisfaction spectrum were Frontier with a jumbo jet-sized number of complaints. American’s baggage handling took a hit for misplacing 3.8 bags per every 1,000 passengers compared to Spirit, which only lost 1.7 bags per 1,000 passengers.

American fliers have weighed in on their favorite airlines, and Delta, Alaska, and Southwest Airlines rule the roost, according to a new study by ThePoints...

Article Image

Southwest and its mechanics union agree on tentative new contract

Over the weekend, Southwest Airlines and its mechanics union reached a tentative agreement for a new contract. The proposed agreement comes more than six years after the carrier began negotiations with the union representing its roughly 2,400 mechanics.

The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) warned recently that the airline’s contentious relationship with its mechanics was to blame for an “unprecedented” number of canceled flights.

Southwest said its mechanics were forcing unnecessary flight cancellations by flagging minor maintenance issues, such as missing seat row numbers and other issues not related to the safety of its planes.

The new contract, if approved, would give mechanics $160 million in retroactive pay, an immediate 20 percent pay hike, and 3 percent annual increases each August, according to a statement from the Aircraft Mechanics Fraternal Association (AMFA) and Southwest.

“Our mechanics certainly deserve a new contract, and this industry-leading agreement in principle addresses our employees’ interests,” said Russell McCrady, Southwest’s vice president of labor relations.

The five-year accord must still be voted on by the mechanics.

Last month, Southwest was forced to issue a “state of emergency” due to the higher-than-usual number of delayed and canceled flights. The carrier attributed it to an “uptick in maintenance items.”

Southwest CEO Gary Kelly said the hundreds of flight cancellations cost the airline millions of dollars weekly.

Over the weekend, Southwest Airlines and its mechanics union reached a tentative agreement for a new contract. The proposed agreement comes more than six y...

Article Image

‘Similarities’ cited in Ethiopian and Lion Air 737 Max crashes

From the first moments following this month’s crash of an Ethiopian Airlines jet, suspicion centered on the aircraft itself -- a new Boeing 737 Max 8 jet. Five months earlier, a Lion Air 737 Max 8 had crashed into the sea.

On Sunday, the Ethiopian Minister of Transport announced that a preliminary investigation had found “similarities” between the two disasters. The aircraft has been grounded worldwide while the investigation continues.

Over the weekend, The Wall Street Journal reported that the U.S. Department of Transportation is investigating the approval process for the Boeing 737 Max aircraft type and whether there were “lapses” in that process.

Ethiopia’s top transportation official reports that all relevant data from the Ethiopian Airlines jet has been obtained from the aircraft’s flight data recorder and is being closely analyzed. Without elaborating further on what has been found, Dagmawit Moges said the data would receive additional study.

Similarities?

In the Lion Air crash, which occurred in October, the open investigation focused on a sensor located on the outside of the aircraft that monitors the plane’s angle of attack. When it determines the angle is too steep and could cause the craft to stall, it triggers an automated function that brings down the nose of the plane.

If the sensor transmits faulty data during the plane’s take off, the automatic software called the Maneuvering Characteristics Augmentation System (MCAS) could force the nose of the plane down at a critical time when it should be climbing.

In the case of the Lion Air crash, the flight crew reported difficulty controlling the aircraft shortly after take off, with the plane rising and then falling several times before plunging into the ocean. Both the Lion Air and Ethiopian Airlines crashes occurred just minutes after taking off, when the aircraft was supposed to be climbing.

Investigating the approval

In Washington, the Transportation Department is reportedly focused on how government regulators approved the 737 Max aircraft type for use by the world’s airlines. According to The Journal, the probe began last year shortly after the Lion Air crash.

In its report Sunday, the newspaper said a grand jury in Washington has now issued a subpoena  to at least one person who was said to be involved in the development of the Boeing 737 Max. The report says investigators want to see relevant documents associated with the approval of the aircraft.

The Boeing 737 Max 8 is the fourth generation of the 737, entering service in 2017. According to Boeing, it is the “fastest-selling airplane in Boeing history with about 5,000 orders from more than 100 customers worldwide.”

From the first moments following this month’s crash of an Ethiopian Airlines jet, suspicion centered on the aircraft itself -- a new Boeing 737 Max 8 jet....

Article Image

The U.S. grounds all flights involving Boeing’s 737 MAX

President Trump -- in cooperation with the U.S. Department of Transportation -- issued an emergency order on Wednesday that calls for a nationwide grounding of Boeing’s 737 MAX aircraft. The grounding impacts all U.S. airlines, or those in U.S. territories, and will remain in effect pending further investigation, according to the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA).

“The safety of the American people, of all people, is our paramount concern,” Mr. Trump told reporters at the White House.

The move reverses a previous decision by U.S. regulators on the heels of deadly crashes involving the same model planes in Indonesia and Ethiopia.

Even though aviation regulators from more than 40 countries had banned flights involving the MAX, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) hesitated to make that move, saying it had witnessed “no systemic performance issues” that would precipitate the agency to call off flights involving the jet.

Boeing agrees with the move

Boeing said that it “supports action to temporarily ground 737 MAX operations,” in comments to ConsumerAffairs.

“Boeing continues to have full confidence in the safety of the 737 MAX. However, after consultation with the U.S. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), the U.S. National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB), and aviation authorities and its customers around the world, Boeing has determined -- out of an abundance of caution and in order to reassure the flying public of the aircraft’s safety -- to recommend to the FAA the temporary suspension of operations of the entire global fleet of 371 737 MAX aircraft.”

“We are supporting this proactive step out of an abundance of caution. Safety is a core value at Boeing for as long as we have been building airplanes; and it always will be. There is no greater priority for our company and our industry. We are doing everything we can to understand the cause of the accidents in partnership with the investigators, deploy safety enhancements and help ensure this does not happen again,” Boeing said.

What carriers fly the Boeing 737 MAX?

There are three domestic commercial carriers -- Southwest, American, and United -- that currently have the Boeing 737 MAX as part of their fleet. Southwest has 34, American has 24, and while United doesn’t use the MAX 8, it does have 14 MAX 9 models.

In ConsumerAffairs’ research, we found that Air Lease Corporation leases the 737 MAX to other carriers such as Spirit and Frontier. ConsumerAffairs reached out to Air Lease for specifics on what airlines it leases the MAX to that might be impacted by the grounding, but had not received comment by press time.

Below are statements from the three affected commercial carriers on the grounding of Boeing 737 MAX aircraft.

Southwest Airlines

“As the investigation of Ethiopian Airlines Flight 302 progresses, we are staying in close contact with Boeing, the FAA, and other airlines to learn the cause of the accident,” a Southwest spokesperson told ConsumerAffairs.

“We operate 34 MAX 8 aircraft in our fleet of more than 750 Boeing 737s. We remain confident in the safety and airworthiness of the MAX 8. We don’t have any changes planned to our MAX 8 operations.”

“Additionally, we are not issuing refunds of non-refundable fares, but we are working with customers individually who wish to rebook their flight to another aircraft type.”

United Airlines

“Nothing is more important to us than the safety of our customers and employees,” wrote United Airlines. “As we have said since Sunday, we have been in close contact with investigators as well as Boeing to share data and fully cooperate with regulatory authorities. We will comply with the FAA's order and will ground our 14 Boeing 737 MAX aircraft. We will remain in close contact with authorities as their investigation continues.”

“Since Sunday, we have been working diligently on contingency plans to prepare our fleet to minimize the impact to customers. Our Boeing 737 MAX aircraft account for roughly 40 flights a day and through a combination of spare aircraft and rebooking customers, we do not anticipate a significant operational impact as a result of this order. We will continue to work with our customers to help minimize any disruption to their travel plans.”

American Airlines

“Earlier today the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) informed us that based on new information, they are grounding the United States Boeing 737 MAX fleet out of an abundance of caution,” American Airlines told ConsumerAffairs.

“American Airlines has 24 aircraft affected by this directive. We appreciate the FAA’s partnership, and will continue to work closely with them, the Department of Transportation, National Transportation Safety Board and other regulatory authorities, as well as our aircraft and engine manufacturers. Our teams will make every effort to rebook customers as quickly as possible, and we apologize for any inconvenience.”

How to find out if you’re scheduled to fly on a 737 MAX

To see if your flight is one of the grounded 737 MAX’ on American, Southwest, or United, it’s best to visit your booking site and look for any related updates. Many times that information is right on the flight information available for print or viewable on a clickable tab (e.g. “Aircraft Information”).

It’s possible that if you were booked on a MAX, you may have been rebooked on another plane or, perhaps, another flight because of a change in the number of available seats from one model to another. Make sure you note any changes in seat assignments, departure times, connections, and arrival times in those cases.

If you can’t find the necessary information on the airline’s website, the airlines all post toll-free numbers where you can get the answer you need.

It’s important to remember that airlines can change flights at anytime, so double-checking the situation at the airport will not only ensure you’re on the right flight but probably relieve you of a little stress.

President Trump -- in cooperation with the U.S. Department of Transportation -- issued an emergency order on Wednesday that calls for a nationwide groundin...

Article Image

Southwest Airlines gives waivers to passengers nervous about flying on the Boeing 737 MAX

Only a few days ago, Southwest Airlines was celebrating its inaugural flight to Hawaii. Now, in the midst of the global problems with the Boeing 737 MAX 8 -- a model it has more of than any other airline -- Southwest says it’ll offer waivers for any flier too nervous to board one of those jets.

“As the investigation of Ethiopian Airlines Flight 302 progresses, we are staying in close contact with Boeing, the FAA, and other airlines to learn the cause of the accident,” a Southwest spokesperson told ConsumerAffairs.

“We operate 34 MAX 8 aircraft in our fleet of more than 750 Boeing 737s. We remain confident in the safety and airworthiness of the MAX 8. We don’t have any changes planned to our MAX 8 operations.”

Southwest is doing something that the other carriers haven’t seen the public relations value in yet: it’s giving passengers assigned to those planes the opportunity to change to another, non-MAX, flight.

“Additionally, we are not issuing refunds of non-refundable fares, but we are working with Customers individually who wish to rebook their flight to another aircraft type.”

How can you tell if your Southwest flight is on a Max 8?

In ConsumerAffairs research on routes where Southwest typically uses the 737 MAX, here’s a sample of the routes we found:

  • Las Vegas (LAS) -- Houston Hobby (HOU)

  • Washington Dulles (IAD) -- Denver (DEN)

  • Milwaukee (MKE) -- Phoenix (PHX)

  • Phoenix (PHX) -- San Francisco (SFO)

  • Phoenix (PHX) -- Cleveland (CLE)

  • Nashville (BNA) -- Phoenix (PHX)

  • Dallas Love Field (DAL) -- Denver (DEN)

  • Denver (DEN) -- Sacramento (SMF)

It’s not a certainty that Southwest uses the MAX on all flights for those itineraries, however. To check if a particular flight uses a Boeing 737 MAX, simply click on the flight number in the flight search results. You’ll find the aircraft type under “aircraft information” in that pop-up.

Only a few days ago, Southwest Airlines was celebrating its inaugural flight to Hawaii. Now, in the midst of t...

Article Image

FAA declines to ground Boeing 737 Max 8s in wake of Ethiopian Airlines crash

The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has declined to ground U.S.-based Boeing 737 Max 8 jets in the wake of the second fatal crash of the aircraft in five months. However, some other countries have taken that step.

Chinese regulators have ordered the country’s domestic airlines to suspend all 737 Max operations. Cayman Airways is also among the international carriers that have grounded the 737 Max 8 aircraft until more details are known about Sunday’s crash of an Ethiopian Airlines jet that killed all on board.

In a notice issued late Monday, the FAA said the 737 Max aircraft type is airworthy, but then went on to say that it expects it will require Boeing to make design changes to some of the aircraft’s systems no later than next month.

The FDA reacted in the wake of widespread concern because Sunday’s crash of an Ethiopian Airlines Boeing 737 Max 8 came just five months after a Lion Air Max 8 also crashed on takeoff.

Investigation just beginning

“External reports are drawing similarities between this accident and the Lion Air Flight 610 accident on October 29, 2018,” the FAA said in its notice. “However, this investigation has just begun and to date, we have not been provided data to draw any conclusions or take any actions.”

The FAA’s decision drew immediate criticism of Paul Hudson, president of the consumer group FlyersRights.org.

"The FAA's 'wait and see' attitude risks lives as well as the safety reputation of the US aviation industry,” Hudson said. “Even assuming this design defect should not by itself take the aircraft out of service, the failure to warn airlines and pilots of the new feature, and the inadequacy of training requirements, necessitate an immediate temporary grounding of the Boeing 737 MAX 8."

In the United States, American and Southwest fly some of the 737 Max 8s. United flies a larger version of the aircraft, the 737 Max 9.

American operates 24 Boeing 737 Max 8s and the union representing American flight attendants issued a statement Monday saying that any flight attendants who are uncomfortable working on the aircraft can work on another flight.

In a statement to the media, American said it is working closely with regulatory authorities and “has full confidence in the aircraft.” Southwest Airlines, which flies 34 Max 8s, said it plans no changes in its operations because of Sunday’s crash.

"We have been in contact with Boeing and will continue to stay close to the investigation as it progresses," the company said in the statement.

Focus of the investigation

The investigation into Sunday’s crash is just beginning, but the Lion Air crash in October has focused attention on a new flight control system called MCAS. Though the investigation of the Lion Air crash is ongoing, investigators have suggested the system pushed the nose of the plane down when it was supposed to be climbing.

In the wake of the Lion Air accident, the FAA issued an Airworthiness Directive after an analysis by Boeing showed that “if an erroneously high single angle of attack (AOA) sensor input is received by the flight control system, there is a potential for repeated nose-down trim commands of the horizontal stabilizer.”

It not addressed, the FAA said that could cause the flight crew to have difficulty controlling the airplane, and lead to excessive nose-down attitude and significant loss of altitude.

Travelers booked on a flight can find out if their scheduled plane is a Boeing 737 Max 8 by entering the flight information here.

The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has declined to ground U.S.-based Boeing 737 Max 8 jets in the wake of the second fatal crash of the aircraft in...

Article Image

American Airlines implements new service and emotional support animals policy

After nearly a year of testing out its service and emotional support animal program, American Airlines is refashioning its policies and procedures.

“The goal of these changes is to protect customers who have a legitimate need as well as the team members who work every day to keep all customers safe,” the airline said in a news release. The new changes will be effective for travel starting on April 1.

Complaints about service and emotional support animals have doubled in the last three years. The extremes of in-flight situations -- biting, urinating, or defecating -- set off a maelstrom of policy changes as major U.S. airlines wrestled with finding the perfect way to handle the situation. Even airports got on the bandwagon, going to the extent of creating pet-relief stations and roaming space for pets to frolic.

Miniature horses?

American laid out its new credo -- some with direct consumer implications:

  1. American supports the rights of customers, from veterans to people with disabilities, with a legitimate need for a trained service or support animal. Unfortunately, untrained animals can lead to safety issues for team members, customers and working service and support animals onboard aircraft.

  2. American surveyed 10,400 team members and 18,000 customers about these issues and used their feedback to enact these new policies. The results of this survey, along with additional comments from the airline, were submitted to the U.S. Department of Transportation. The airline’s comments focus on a variety of pet-centric issues ranging from the limitation of species to how it will handle itineraries that include “code-share” partners.

  3. Effective for travel on or after April 1, a traditional service animal may be a dog, a cat or, in some limited circumstances, a miniature horse. Emotional support animals are limited to either a dog or cat only; a customer may only bring one emotional support animal onboard aircraft.

  4. American will require a Veterinary Health Form, along with immunization details, for emotional support animals. Details regarding all of these updated changes and forms, as well as the advanced notice and pre-clearance policy, are available here.

  5. Animals under four months of age will no longer be permitted to travel as service or support animals. Animals under this age usually have not received the necessary vaccinations that protect team members and customers.

What’s next?

It’s too early for consensus on whether American’s new plan will stick or if it’s just another step in toward finding the perfect groove.

If the last year is any indication, other major airlines are likely to follow suit and implement changes from the experiences they’ve encountered with their new policies.

If the question of service or emotional support animals impacts you as a consumer, it’s always smart to get caught up on the current policy of the airline you’re flying with. If you’re flying internationally, policies and the required paperwork can vary greatly from what domestic carriers and the U.S. requires. As an example, foreign airlines are only required to recognize service and support dogs at the present time. One good resource ConsumerAffairs found for international pet travel policies is BringFido.com.

Fliers with pets are always wise to check with the Federal Aviation Administration’s (FAA) to review its latest updates on the matter. You can find the FAA’s current stance on the situation by clicking here. The agency has also produced this video to give consumers a broad overview.

After nearly a year of testing out its service and emotional support animal program, American Airlines is refashioning its policies and procedures.“The...

Article Image

Ethiopian plane crash focuses attention on the Boeing 737

An Ethiopian Airlines jet crashed on takeoff Sunday from Addis Ababa and all 157 people on board were killed.

Air crashes have become a rarity in recent years, but the crash of the Ethiopian Airlines plane follows the October crash of a Lion Air jet that killed 189 passengers and crew. The fact that both planes were Boeing 737 Max 8s may be a coincidence -- after all, the Boeing 737 is the most widely used aircraft type for commercial aviation.

Even so, both recent crashes occurred shortly after the planes took off so investigators may take a closer look at the aircraft and its safety features.

‘Almost unheard of’

In both recent crashes, the jets were fairly new, having been placed into service just months before. John Cox, a senior crash investigator and former airline pilot, told CNBC that “it’s almost unheard of” for two new airliners to have fatal crashes so close together. He points out, however, that there doesn’t appear to be any evidence the two planes suffered the same failure.

Boeing says it has assembled a crew that will travel to Ethiopia to assist in the crash investigation.

“Boeing is deeply saddened to learn of the passing of the passengers and crew on Ethiopian Airlines Flight 302, a 737 MAX 8 airplane,” the company said in a statement. “We extend our heartfelt sympathies to the families and loved ones of the passengers and crew on board and stand ready to support the Ethiopian Airlines team.”

While plane crashes were tragic but regular occurrences in the past, they seem almost shocking now. Commercial aviation safety hit an all-time high in 2017 when the Aviation Safety Network (ASN) reported just 10 fatal commercial aircraft accidents resulting in 79 deaths. None of the accidents occurred in the U.S. or involved U.S. airlines.

At the time, ASN President Harro Ranter told ConsumerAffairs that years of learning from accidents and worldwide knowledge-sharing likely contributed to the improved safety record.

Nearly two decades without a major crash

The U.S. has been at the forefront of improved flight safety. Since November 12, 2001, when American Airlines flight 571 crashed on takeoff in a Queens, N.Y. neighborhood, there has been no major passenger jet crash among U.S.-chartered airlines.

During that time there were fatal crashes involving commuter aircraft in Charlotte, N.C., Lexington, Ky., and Clarence, N.Y. In 2013, an Asiana Airlines jet crash-landed at San Francisco International Airport, killing two passengers.

Last year, a passenger aboard a Southwest Airlines Boeing 737 was killed when an engine exploded and flying metal broke a window. The woman sitting next to the window died after the loss of pressurization nearly pulling her out of the aircraft. An investigation attributed the engine failure to metal fatigue.

Southwest Airlines’ fleet is mostly made up of Boeing 737 aircraft.

An Ethiopian Airlines jet crashed on takeoff Sunday from Addis Ababa and all 157 people on board were killed.Air crashes have become a rarity in recent...

Article Image

Airlines drop prices to compete with Southwest’s cheap Hawaii fares

In an effort to compete with Southwest Airlines, which yesterday offered special discount fares for a limited time in celebration of its launch of Hawaii flight schedules, other airlines are extending special offers of their own.

Alaska Airlines’ round trip California-Hawaii fares dropped to $198 roundtrip for a few hours on Monday, SFGate reported. By Tuesday morning, “the fare war battlefield” had settled down a bit, the website noted.

The lowest nonstop fares for spring trips fell to the $278-$298 roundtrip range on Alaska, Hawaiian, and United Airlines. Consumers can take advantage of fares in this range for springtime flights before prices rise to around $400-$500 on June 15, when peak summer season sends fares back up.

The best deals on springtime flights will be available to consumers who fly on Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday, or Thursday in both directions between now and mid-June.

Discounted fares

Through March 7 at 11:59 p.m. PT, Alaska Airlines is offering discounted flights from cities like Seattle, San Francisco, Oakland, Sacramento, and San Jose to Hawaiian destinations like Honolulu, Kona, Kauai, and Maui. The sale applies to flights between April 22 and May 22.

Roundtrip Hawaii fares during peak summer season usually run in the $600-$700 range. However, “with all the new competition, we are seeing fares drop below $400 for a handful of summer season flights-- that's also a remarkably good deal,” SFGate noted. “For example in mid-July, several of Alaska's lowest Saver fares are just $398 roundtrip.”

High demand for Southwest’s Hawaii flights

Southwest Airlines’ cheap inaugural flights to Hawaii sold out quickly.

"Demand for those first seats at our two-day launch fare has thousands of our customers already booked on new flights between California and the Islands," the company said Monday. "Many other low fares are still out there for interisland service and travel between the mainland and the Islands."

On May 12, Southwest said it will start interisland service between Honolulu and Ellison Onizuka International Airport at Keahole on Hawaii Island. Interisland one-way flights are priced as low as $29.

In an effort to compete with Southwest Airlines, which yesterday offered special discount fares for a limited time in celebration of its launch of Hawaii f...

Article Image

Southwest Airlines finally gets clearance to fly to Hawaii

Want to fly from California to Hawaii for less than $50? You can, but you’d better hurry -- the offer from Southwest Airlines ends today.

Southwest this week finally gained approval to begin service to Hawaii and is marking the occasion with $49 one-way fares from Oakland and San Jose to the islands if travelers book March 5. Consumers can also book today for inter-island flights that will begin April 28 and receive fares as low as $29.

Southwest will launch its service to Hawaii March 17 with a flight from Oakland to Honolulu. Service between San Jose and Honolulu will begin in May.

Inter-island service will connect Honolulu and Kahului late next month with four flights a day in both directions. On May 12, Southwest will begin inter-island flights between Honolulu and Keahole on roughly the same schedule.

"As we answer the call for Southwest in Hawaii with an initial schedule of service that speaks to a long-held hope of our customers, I applaud and congratulate our people for their steady and impressive work to bring our world-famous hospitality and game-changing value to the Islands," Gary Kelley, Southwest’s chairman and CEO, said in a statement.

Long time coming

Southwest’s service to Hawaii, seen as important for the company’s growth, has been a long time coming. It was delayed at the end of last year during the government shutdown because the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) was unable to complete its certification work.

"We are anxious for the government to resolve this shutdown so we can bring low fares and a boost to Hawaii's travel and tourism industry,” the airline said when it reported earnings in January.

The airline announced its plans to introduce service to Hawaii in October 2017. It formally filed its application with the FAA in January 2018. Prior to that, the airline said it spent years studying the Hawaiian islands with a focus on learning how it could best serve the different communities there.

The special discount fares celebrating the launch of service will be available through 11:59 p.m. Pacific Standard Time on March 5, 2019. But like most promotional fares, they are only available on certain days of the week.

Want to fly from California to Hawaii for less than $50? You can, but you’d better hurry -- the offer from Southwest Airlines ends today.Southwest this...

Article Image

Experts rank the best frequent flyer programs of 2019

Do you have a favorite airline? If you’re like most consumers, probably not.

Like most people, you probably look for the best price, the shortest time, and the fewest number of add-ons you have to pay for, like luggage. Simply put, passenger loyalty is hard to come by for most airlines.

Yet, you’re probably sitting on at least one frequent flyer program that you chose because you actually liked the airline -- you had a good experience flying with them, there’s lots of flights in and out of your hometown, etc.

But, did you pick one of the so-called “best” frequent flyer programs?

WalletHub got out its calculator and ran the numbers on 23 key metrics ranging from the actual value of a rewards point/mile to the blackout date policies for the 10 largest domestic airlines’ loyalty rewards.

Here’s what the researchers came up with as the best frequent flyer programs:

  1. Delta SkyMiles

  2. United Airlines - Mileage Plan

  3. JetBlue Airways - TrueBlue

  4. Southwest Airlines - Rapid Rewards

  5. Hawaiian Airlines - HawaiianMiles

To find out which airline miles program is best for you, you might give WalletHub’s frequent flyer miles calculator a spin. The calculator can customize the results of this study based on your own annual airline budget.

The “best” may not necessarily be the best for you

While JetBlue’s loyalty program may be a Top 3 winner, you might not be anywhere close to an airport where JetBlue flies to or from, and paying extra to get to a JetBlue departure could cost you hundreds more.

To gauge which programs might work best for you, take a few minutes to see how each airline fared in each of WalletHub’s 23 categories. Look at the number of destinations served, how long before your miles will expire, comments from other program users, and perks like if your membership gets you a freebie on luggage or if your program is tied to other brands such as the one Delta announced with Lyft.

LifeHacker cites travel experts interviewed by WalletHub who say that consumers are likely to expect loyalty programs to pull back on their generosity as time goes on.

“Airlines have been moving to more of a ‘bus in the sky’ experience, where any additional value has been stripped, when you analyze the offerings from only a decade ago,” says Donna Wertalik, director of marketing at the Virginia Tech Pamplin College of Business. “The model will continue to move in this direction.” Wertalik says you can expect the value of miles and points to decline over time.

Do you have a favorite airline? If you’re like most consumers, probably not.Like most people, you probably look for the best price, the shortest time,...

Article Image

Southwest says mechanics union to blame for flight cancellations

Over the last week, Southwest Airlines has canceled over 600 flights and delayed over 1,000 others -- more than any other U.S. airline and double its own daily average, according to flight-tracking site FlightAware.

The unusually high number of out-of-service aircrafts prompted the carrier to issue a ‘state of emergency” earlier this week. In an interview with CNBC, a spokesperson for Southwest acknowledged the “slight increase” in flight cancellations and attributed it to an “uptick in maintenance items.”

Now, the carrier is pinning the blame on a mechanics union called the Aircraft Mechanics Fraternal Association (AMFA).

Problems with mechanics union employees

Southwest said the mechanics union it’s been negotiating with has a history of labor disruptions. The company said it’s investigating the "current disruption and exploring all possible remedies.''

"On Feb. 12, just days after our last negotiations session with AMFA, we experienced an unprecedented number of out-of-service aircraft in four specific maintenance locations despite no change in our maintenance programs, no changes in leadership, and no changes in our policies and procedures," Mike Van de Ven, Southwest's chief operating officer, said in a statement.

"We are committed to operating a safe fleet, and every report is investigated, which is why we issued a notice to require an 'all hands' response to get out-of-service aircraft back into the fleet serving our customers."

Southwest also noted that it has two pending lawsuits against the union.

Mechanics union responds

In response to the accusations, the mechanics union quickly countered by accusing Southwest of using it as a scapegoat for other issues.

"Southwest Airlines scapegoating of its expert aircraft maintenance technicians does not bode well for the airline’s safe operations,'' Bret Oestreich, national director of AMFA, said in a statement. "Safety is, and always will be, our number one priority.''

"For Southwest's leadership to connect the airline's self-declared 'operational emergency' to collective bargaining negotiations is simply an attempt to divert attention away from the airline's safety issues," the organization said in a statement.

Over the last week, Southwest Airlines has canceled over 600 flights and delayed over 1,000 others -- more than any other U.S. airline and double its own d...

Article Image

U.S. court gives people unfairly placed on the ‘No-Fly List’ the right to sue

In a 7-3 vote on Thursday, a federal appeals court said that American Muslims who found themselves on the “No-Fly List” because they refused to become a government informant can file lawsuits against FBI agents and seek monetary damages.

The plaintiffs -- which include all U.S. citizens or permanent residents born abroad --  had sought damages under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, a 1993 United States federal law that "ensures that interests in religious freedom are protected." The plaintiffs claimed that being on the “No-Fly List” precipitated social alienation, the inability to visit relatives, and even job loss.

“The dissent argued that the decision places an unacceptable burden on federal employees tasked with protecting national security,” commented aviation blog LiveAndLetsFly. “The dissent feared these professionals will become too intimidated to protect national security for fear of being held personally liable. The dissent also argued that Supreme Court precedent specifically limited the liability of government officials for such misconduct.”

“...should not government officials be held accountable for essentially bullying innocent parties who do not wish serve as government informants? Perhaps it is time for Congress to change the law.”

This is the second such No-Fly List court ruling already this year. Reuters recently reported that the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals voted 8-3 that the government should pay millions of dollars to lawyers for a Muslim woman it put on the No-Fly List after mistakenly branding her a terrorist.

One might think the government would have its airline passenger scrutiny act together by now. As far back as 2005, ConsumerAffairs reported that the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) found itself in a stew when it mistakenly put 30,000 unsuspecting airline passengers on a "terrorist watch" list.

What is the No-Fly List?

The No-Fly List is a list created and maintained by the federal government's Terrorist Screening Center (TSC). It is made up of people prohibited from boarding commercial aircraft for travel within, into, or out of the United States.

The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) has long criticized the list as “bloated, discriminatory, and unfair.”

“Because of the extreme secrecy surrounding the No-Fly List, people generally only discover that they are on it when they are denied boarding at the airport,” writes the ACLU.

“The public does not know how many people are on the No-Fly List, and the criteria for inclusion are so broad and vague that they inevitably ensnare innocent people engaged in First Amendment-protected speech, activity, or association. The process the government has established for people on the No-Fly List to challenge their blacklisting is grossly insufficient and violates the Constitution’s due process guarantee.”

Name-calling consumers has major consequences

As credit reporting agency TransUnion found out a couple of years ago, misidentifying a consumer as a terrorist can be a costly mistake.

When TransUnion labeled consumers as criminals in their credit reports, a class action lawsuit on behalf of more than 8,000 consumers ensued, eventually resulting in a $60 million jury award to the plaintiffs.

In a 7-3 vote on Thursday, a federal appeals court said that American Muslims who found themselves on the “No-Fly List” because they refused to become a go...

Article Image

FAA probing Southwest’s system for calculating cargo weight

Federal regulators are reportedly investigating Southwest Airlines for the way it calculates the weight of checked bags on suspicion that it is under-reporting its load.

The Wall Street Journal reports the investigation began a year ago and has turned up “systemic and significant” mistakes. It’s a critical issue because pilots make calculations based on the weight the plane is carrying.

The investigation by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) reportedly found the difference between what the pilots believed to be the weight they were carrying and the actual weight was as much as 1,000 pounds.

According to the aviation website Skybrary, it is important to know the exact weight on board because any excess weight reduces the efficiency of an aircraft and the safety margin available if an emergency condition should arise.

“Overloading effects stability,” the site’s editors write. “An aircraft that is stable and controllable when loaded normally may have very different flight characteristics when overloaded. Although the distribution of weight has the most direct effect on this, an increase in the aircraft’s gross weight may be expected to have an adverse effect on stability, regardless of the location of the CG (center of gravity).”

In a statement to the media, Southwest said it is continuing to track and report its operational data to the FAA “so that we can mitigate and eliminate any operational risks.” There have been no Southwest operational incidents attributed to a misloaded aircraft.

State of emergency

February hasn’t been especially kind to Southwest. On Friday the airline issued a “state of emergency” after the out-of-service rate for its fleet of Boeing 737s doubled. Around 100 flights had to be canceled because of maintenance issues, complicating weather delays.

"The uptick in maintenance items we experienced over the last few days have resulted in a slight increase" in cancellations, a Southwest Airlines spokesperson told CNBC on Friday.

Southwest said it believes any weight discrepancies reported to the FAA have been resolved, though it is continuing to closely monitor its baggage control system. The FAA said its investigation will remain open until such time that it is satisfied that the airline has resolved the issue.

Federal regulators are reportedly investigating Southwest Airlines for the way it calculates the weight of checked bags on suspicion that it is under-repor...

Article Image

Southwest Airlines issues ‘state of emergency’ warning after its out-of-service rate for its fleet doubles

Inside of a week’s time, Southwest Airlines has been on quite a rollercoaster ride. First, it raised a toast to news that its employees earned $544 million in profit sharing, then had to stare down a public relations nightmare over 100 cancelled flights, a thousand delayed flights, and reports that the airline told its mechanics that, despite those unexpected groundings, they better show up for work or look elsewhere for a paycheck.

"The uptick in maintenance items we experienced over the last few days have resulted in a slight increase" in cancellations, a Southwest Airlines spokesperson told CNBC. However, the official held off on providing a breakdown for interruptions caused by either maintenance or Mother Nature.

Flying or not, Southwest told its mechanics to sit tight. According to a report by the Chicago Business Journal, mechanics were told they’d be assigned overtime. However, officials said they would only honor vacation or shift trade requests that had already been approved.

The number of Southwest’s cancelled flights numbered more than any other U.S. airline and was double Southwest’s daily average, according to flight-tracking site FlightAware. The airline typically pencils in a max of 20 aircraft removed from service for various and sundry issues on any given day.

Southwest’s negative experience with its Boeing 737 fleet has been mounting. Less than a year ago, a cracked window caused Southwest Airlines jet to make unscheduled landing and, around the same time, federal safety investigators amped up their examination of the engine of a Southwest Airlines jet that killed a passenger when it exploded in midair.

How old is too old in airplane years?

Some may wonder if the life expectancy on Southwest’s fleet is running out. Aviation experts have weighed in on some of the problems that might come about over time.

"Aircraft lifespan is established by the manufacturer and is usually based on takeoff and landing cycles,” former Federal Aviation Administration official John Petrakis told Smithsonian’s Air & Space magazine. “The fuselage is most susceptible to fatigue, but the wings are too, especially on short hauls where an aircraft goes through pressurization cycles every day."

In Southwest’s situation, the average age of its 737 fleet is close to 11 years, with some of its models still flying 19 years after their first take-off.

Comparatively, Southwest isn’t pushing its luck further than any other airline, according to AirSafeNews. American, Delta, and United all count on their fleet to last that long.

Like an a automobile, if an airplane is well-maintained and follows instructions from the FAA and the manufacturer, its life expectancy can increase.

“The whole focus is to detect problems before it becomes catastrophic,” Bill de Becker, Chairman of Conklin and de Becker Aviation, told TravelPulse.

Inside of a week’s time, Southwest Airlines has been on quite a rollercoaster ride. First, it raised a toast to news that its employees earned $544 million...

Article Image

Lufthansa sues passenger over using the ‘hidden city’ fare ploy

In an interesting twist, Lufthansa has filed a lawsuit against a passenger for leveraging a ploy that seasoned flyers use to cop cheaper fares.

CNN reports that Lufthansa has dragged a passenger into court for not showing up to the last leg of his ticketed journey. While that might seem like an innocent enough act, the German airline claims that the passenger was trying to leverage the "hidden city" ticket trick, a method experienced airline passengers employ to get cheaper fares.

Before travelers were pulled into the digital world of algorithms that airlines use to maximize their revenue stream, they would often try ploys like “hidden city ticketing,” where the passenger books a ticket to a fictitious destination (the "hidden" city) with a connection at the intended destination, then walks away at the connection node and discards the remaining segment.

Why? Because the flight between point A to point C, with the connection at point B, might be less expensive than a flight from point A to point B.

In Lufthansa’s situation, an unnamed passenger booked a return flight from Oslo, Norway to Seattle, Washington that had a planned layover in Frankfurt, Germany. However, the wily passenger used all legs of the outbound flight, but opted out of the Frankfurt to Oslo return flight and, instead, flew on an unconnected Lufthansa reservation from Frankfurt to Berlin, Germany.

Lufthansa didn’t like that. The airline saw the flyer’s tactic as a violation of its terms and conditions and is asking for more than $2,000 in compensation.

A German district court gave a thumbs-down to the airline’s lawsuit in December, 2018, but a Lufthansa representative confirmed to CNN that the airline has "already filed the appeal against the decision."

Unethical or just playing the game?

Leveraging the hidden city ploy is old hat to veteran flyers. Bill Rieke, a Cincinnati-based elite, frequent, and long distance traveler, told ConsumerAffairs that when Comair was in Cincinnati  -- and Cincy had the highest average ticket prices in the country -- he would often use the hidden cities maneuver.

“I would simply have someone drive me 80 miles to Dayton, then fly back through Cincinnati to some destination. Then on the return home, I’d just fly back to Cincinnati and never go to Dayton,” Rieke said.

Whether playing that game is kosher or not is up for debate. Some say it’s unethical because a flyer is taking a seat they’re not going to actually use -- one that another passenger might need to get somewhere at the last minute.

The legal hounds at an airline’s headquarters might argue that hidden city ticketing violates their “contract of carriage,” but some travel industry observers disagree.

"’Hidden city’ ticketing is neither illegal nor immoral,” Scott Keyes of Scott’s Cheap Flights told ConsumerAffairs. “No law is broken when a passenger decides not to take a flight he or she bought, and twice now when airlines have sued to cut back on the practice, their lawsuits have been dismissed. There's a reason the New York Times' Ethicist gave his seal of approval to ‘hidden city’ ticketing -- when consumers buy something they're under no obligation to use the entire product. This is true whether it's a plane ticket or an extra-large pizza.”

The almighty dollar vs. the besmirched consumer

Airline deregulation has created sky high profits for carriers but few silver linings for travelers.

In Lufthansa’s case, that’s the big question: which has more value? Is it the almighty dollar and potentially negative public relations value of taking on a customer for trying to get a deal on airfare or grinning and bearing a crease in the company’s policies?

Lufthansa’s consumer satisfaction rating is pockmarked with experiences that beg for an answer to that question.

“Lufthansa used to be my go-to airline even when I worked for a certain ‘5 star’, top rated Skytrax airline, I would always use, recommend and speak highly of Lufthansa,” said one consumer. “However, their new fare paradigm which includes economy and ‘premium economy’ and less than competitive fares has me jaded.”

In an interesting twist, Lufthansa has filed a lawsuit against a passenger for leveraging a ploy that seasoned flyers use to cop cheaper fares.CNN repo...

Article Image

TSA confiscated 4,000+ firearms fliers tried to get through baggage screening in 2018

It was a banner year for the Transportation and Safety Administration (TSA) in 2018. More than 800 million travelers and airline crew members passed through TSA screening. While those metrics are great to wave around, there’s another record-breaking metric within that 800 million that could raise some eyebrows.

In its review of 2018, the TSA reports that it found an average of nearly 12 firearms every day in security checks -- 4,239 in all.

“Throughout the year, TSA officers demonstrated great professionalism, dedication, integrity and remained committed to the mission to secure you – the traveling public. Thanks to their vigilance and skills, TSA officers intercepted a record number of firearms in 2018,” the agency wrote.

Most of the firearms were discovered in carry-ons at checkpoints across the U.S. -- 86 percent of those loaded with ammunition, and 33 percent with a round of ammo already chambered.

Airports on alert

It’s not exactly a championship ring that airport employees would be proud to wear, but TSA agents at Atlanta-Hartsfield -- the world’s busiest airport -- discovered 298 firearms in 2018, more than any other U.S. hub and up 53 from 2017.

The Top 10 airports seizing the most firearms are as follows:

  1. Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta International Airport (ATL): 298 – an increase of 53 compared to 2017 (253 loaded);

  2. Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport (DFW): 219 (193 loaded);

  3. Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport (PHX): 129 (120 loaded);

  4. Denver International Airport (DEN): 126 (95 loaded);

  5. Orlando International Airport (MCO): 123 (112 loaded);

  6. George Bush Intercontinental Airport (IAH): 117 – a decrease of 25 firearms compared to 2017 (115 loaded);

  7. Fort Lauderdale-Hollywood International Airport (FLL): 96 (80 loaded);

  8. Austin-Bergstrom International Airport (AUS): 93 (76 loaded);

  9. Dallas Love Field Airport (DAL): 89 (83 loaded);

  10. Nashville International Airport (BNA): 86 (80 loaded).

Along with firearms, the TSA hauled in a bevy of other prohibited items, including smoke grenades, lighter fluid, fireworks, knife combs, scissors (longer than 4 inches), miniature Louisville Slugger baseball bats, and mortar shell replicas.

Fake or not, those mortar shells brought baggage screening to a screaming halt until an explosives specialist could examine the shells and give the all-clear.

“Anything resembling an explosive item is prohibited in carry-on and checked bags,” the TSA’s Jay Wagner reminds travelers. “If you are not sure if an item is allowed in your bag, check out our What Can I Bring tool, snap a photo and Tweet or Facebook Message us, call us at (866) 289-9673, or shoot us an email (pun intended).”

It was a banner year for the Transportation and Safety Administration (TSA) in 2018. More than 800 million travelers and airline crew members passed throug...

Article Image

United Airlines adding more ‘premium’ seats to its flights

Airlines can boost profits if they can sell more of their “premium service” tickets, but to do that they need more premium seats. In most airliners, there are a dozen or so first-class seats, maybe as many in business class, and the rest in coach.

United Airlines has just announced it is reconfiguring at least 100 of its planes to add more space for its upgraded travelers. Those flying economy, however, will likely be giving up some space.

"In an era where many airlines are adding seats to their aircraft to crowd more passengers onto the plane, we're re-configuring more than 100 of our aircraft and doing exactly the opposite – for the benefit of our customers," said Andrew Nocella, United's executive vice president and chief commercial officer.

The extra space will come at an added ticket cost. But the airlines have figured out that most of their profit comes from passengers who want comfort and amenities and are willing to pay for them. In this move, United is adding premium seats on its most traveled and lucrative routes.

Zac Honig, who writes The Points Guy Blog, reports that the retrofitted planes include some of United’s Boeing 767-300 ERs that will have “an exceptionally high number of lie-flat” seats to accommodate passengers on longer flights.

Adding a smaller aircraft

United also announced that it will deploy a fleet of 50-passenger jets on some highly traveled regional routes, and these aircraft will have mostly premium seating. The introduction of the Bombardier CRJ 550 aircraft is subject to government certification, which is expected to be complete by the end of the year.

These mostly first-class aircraft will feature LED lighting, a self-serve beverage and snack station for customers seated in the premium cabin, Wi-Fi, and extra overall legroom. United says the aircraft will also provide four storage closets for storage of carry-on bags.

The CRJ 550 will be configured in two cabins and feature 10 United First seats; 20 Economy Plus seats and 20 Economy seats.

For more than two decades airlines have struggled to raise fares, not daring to raise them too much out of fear of losing the traveler to a competitor. United’s strategy appears to be one aimed at keeping economy fares stable while increasing revenue from travelers willing to pay more in return for a more pleasant experience.

"From adding more premium seats on aircraft that serve some of our most traveled routes, introducing a revolutionary, best-in-class 50-seat experience or simply offering free DIRECTV on more than 200 aircraft, we are committed to making United the airline that our customers choose to fly," Nocella said.

Airlines can boost profits if they can sell more of their “premium service” tickets, but to do that they need more premium seats. In most airliners, there...

Article Image

Apple Music soon to be free for American Airlines passengers

Apple Music and American Airlines (AA) have reached a deal that will give passengers on any AA flight in the U.S. the ability to stream more than 50 million songs for free via in-flight wifi. Previously, travelers had to pay for in-flight internet service or download music before the flight.

Under the new deal, passengers who don't have Apple Music can also sign up for a free three-month trial during the flight.

“For most travelers, having music to listen to on the plane is just as important as anything they pack in their suitcases,” Oliver Schusser, vice president of Apple Music, said in a statement. “With the addition of Apple Music on American flights, we are excited that customers can now enjoy their music in even more places. Subscribers can stream all their favorite songs and artists in the air, and continue to listen to their personal library offline, giving them everything they need to truly sit back, relax and enjoy their flight.”

The free in-flight Apple Music offer will be available to passengers on all of the airline’s domestic flights beginning February 1.

Improving in-flight entertainment

The new deal with Apple is part of American’s larger goal to roll out more in-flight entertainment options to passengers, the company said.

American has added new shows, movies, and free live TV (which includes Sunday’s Super Bowl). The airline is also equipping its planes with high-speed internet and power outlets at passenger seats.

“Our guests want to make the most of their time when flying us. That’s why we’re investing in faster Wi-Fi, a variety of entertainment options, and why we’re so excited to introduce Apple Music to more of our customers,” said Janelle Anderson, American’s VP of Global Marketing.

“Providing customers with more ways to stay connected throughout each flight is one way to show we value their business and the time they spend with us.”

Apple Music and American Airlines (AA) have reached a deal that will give passengers on any AA flight in the U.S. the ability to stream more than 50 millio...

Article Image

Aviation unions express alarm at effect of the government shutdown

Without taking sides in the standoff, the unions representing various parts of the commercial aviation industry have called on the White House and Congressional Democrats to end the government shutdown, warning that safety in the air is “deteriorating by the day.”

In a joint statement to leaders in Washington and the traveling public, the unions warned that the human and economic consequences of the government shutdown are increasing and causing greater harm.

The statement was released by the unions representing air traffic controllers, pilots, and flight attendants. It noted that the impact of the shutdown is being felt most severely within the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA).

“Most of the FAA staff who certify the safety of aircraft have been furloughed and safety reporting and oversight systems have been suspended,” the union leaders wrote. “This is critical to resolving identified issues.”

Previous statements from the groups also pointed out that air traffic controller training has been suspended, slowing the integration of new employees into the system. Meanwhile, the current staff of air traffic controllers are performing vital and highly-sensitive safety functions without pay.

Training suspended

Training has also been suspended for new pilots, and the FAA is also unable to issue certifications required for current pilots to upgrade their status.

The union leaders are also concerned about the impact on security, noting that Transportation Security Administration (TSA) and Customs and Border Protection (CBP) agents aren’t being paid, prompting some to look for other jobs.

“The situation is changing at a rapid pace. Major airports are already seeing security checkpoint closures, with many more potentially to follow. Safety inspectors and federal cybersecurity staff are not back on the job at pre-shutdown levels, and those not on furlough are working without pay.

In a sobering statement, the union leaders say that can’t even calculate the level of risk currently at play, “nor predict the point at which the entire system will break.”

Economic impact

In addition to safety concerns, the government is also having an economic impact on the nation’s airlines that depend on government employee and contractor travel, both of which have been suspended during the shutdown.

Earlier this month, Delta Airlines predicted that the loss of government business would reduce revenue by at least $25 million during January. This week Southwest Airlines reported that the ongoing shutdown has cost an estimated $10 million to $15 million in lost revenue during  January.

Southwest executives also confirmed that plans to expand service to Hawaii are on hold due to a lack of available FAA personnel. The Dallas-based airline had planned to start Hawaii service early this year.

Without taking sides in the standoff, the unions representing various parts of the commercial aviation industry have called on the White House and Congress...

Article Image

Partial government shutdown affecting Southwest Airlines

The partial government shutdown, which began December 22, has taken a financial toll on Southwest Airlines. The company revealed on Thursday that the ongoing shutdown has cost an estimated $10 million to $15 million in lost revenue during the month of January.

Southwest executives confirmed that the process of expanding service to Hawaii is on hold due to the fact that Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) workers that oversee the process of approving Hawaii service expansion were furloughed during the shutdown.

The Dallas-based airline had planned to start Hawaii service early this year.

“Our remaining work is currently suspended until the government reopens and the FAA is allowed to resume normal certification activities,” Southwest said in its earnings release. "We are anxious for the government to resolve this shutdown so we can bring low fares and a boost to Hawaii's travel and tourism industry.”

Impact on airline industry

The Transportation Security Administration (TSA) said the rate of worker absences hit 10 percent on Sunday. On the same Sunday last year, the rate was just 3.1 percent.

"Many employees are reporting that they are not able to report to work due to financial limitations,” the TSA stated. In a CNBC interview, Southwest CEO Gary Kelly warned that the shutdown is having a big impact on aviation workers.

"In our business, at least, we deal with the government in a very intimate way... my hat is off to all the federal workers that are showing up. They are heroic. They shouldn't have to put up with this," Kelly said.

Southwest’s estimated revenue loss is lower than estimates put out by Delta Air Lines. Last week, Delta said it has likely lost about $25 million during the month of January.

The partial government shutdown, which began December 22, has taken a financial toll on Southwest Airlines. The company revealed on Thursday that the ongoi...

Article Image

Government shutdown causes increase in TSA worker absences

The partial government shutdown, now in its fifth week, has caused a spike in the rate of unscheduled absences among Transportation Security Administration (TSA) workers.

In a Monday press release, the TSA said the rate of worker absences hit 10 percent on Sunday. On the same Sunday last year, the rate was just 3.1 percent.

"Yesterday's complete figures show that TSA experienced a national rate of 10 percent of unscheduled absences compared to a 3.1 percent rate one year ago on the same day, Jan. 20, 2018," the TSA said. "Many employees are reporting that they are not able to report to work due to financial limitations."

Surge in absences

Most passengers who passed through U.S. airports on Sunday experienced waits of less than 30 minutes, which is “within normal TSA times,” according to the agency. However, “some airports experienced longer than usual wait times” due to the increase in worker call-outs.

Over the weekend, one security checkpoint at Baltimore/Washington International Thurgood Marshall Airport had to be closed due to “excessive callouts.” The TSA announced on Saturday that it would be “exercising a contingency plan” at the airport.

“Checkpoint A will be closing at 5:35pm,” the agency tweeted. “Passengers should arrive early for evening flights. Contact airport & airlines for updates.”

The TSA urges those who will be boarding a flight amid the ongoing government shutdown to seek current airline and airport information and allow enough time to get through the airport.

Backlash from federal employees

Earlier this month, the National Air Traffic Controllers Association (NATCA) filed a lawsuit in United States District Court on behalf of its members who haven’t been paid since December 28.

"Every moment of every hour of every day, the skies of the United States are overseen by the hardworking employees of the United States Federal Aviation Administration ("FAA")," the association wrote in its complaint. "Each day, the FAA's Air Traffic Controllers are responsible for ensuring the safe routing of tens of thousands of flights, often working lengthy, grueling overtime shifts to do so. In fact, plaintiffs' job is so demanding and requires such rare skills that the FAA struggles to maintain a full complement of certified Air Traffic Controllers, even under normal circumstances.”

Once the shutdown ends, workers will likely receive back pay. However, it still appears as though there’s no end in sight.

President Trump recently proposed to offer temporary protections for young immigrants, known as Dreamers, in exchange for the $5.7 billion he has demanded for a border wall. Democrats have said that they find the proposal unacceptable. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) said the plan equated to “more hostage taking.”

The partial government shutdown, now in its fifth week, has caused a spike in the rate of unscheduled absences among Transportation Security Administration...

Article Image

TSA is switching to floppy-eared dogs to sniff for bombs and drugs

Nobody likes a tattletale, but looking cute might win over some friends. The Transportation Security Administration (TSA) is reportedly phasing its pointy-eared dogs out of sniffing duties because people generally prefer floppy ears.  

“We find the passenger acceptance of floppy-ear dogs is just better,” an agency spokesman told the Washington Examiner.

The TSA uses hundreds of dogs across the country to sniff luggage for bombs or drugs. When a pointy-eared dog retires, the TSA says they are now making a conscious effort to replace it with a floppy-eared dog.

It may not be much comfort to people trying to fly across the country with a joint or something else illegal, but children apparently find floppy-eared dogs to be less frightening.  

“It presents just a little bit less of a concern. Doesn’t scare children,” the spokesman added.

Nobody likes a tattletale, but looking cute might win over some friends. The Transportation Security Administration (TSA) is reportedly phasing its pointy-...

Article Image

Flying over the holidays? Be ready for stronger security screening

It’s the holiday season, and the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) is expecting a sleighful of flyers. Between December 19 and January 5, the agency estimates more than 40 million passengers will go through its security screening checkpoints, an increase of 6 percent from 2017.

"TSA’s layered approach to security and its dedicated screening workforce will be hard at work securing the aviation system, from the moment travelers make their flight reservation to when they arrive at their destination this holiday season,” said TSA Administrator David Pekoske in the agency’s holiday travel advisory.

Pre-airport checklist

If the holidays are the first time you’ve flown this year, you should know that stronger security measures were put in place earlier in 2018. As a result, flyers may experience a more thorough screening process.

To make your trip through security as stress-free as possible, the TSA recommends...

  • Arriving at the airport at least two hours early;

  • Putting all electronics in a place where you can get to them quickly and easily for scanning;

  • Separating foods, powders, and any other materials that might clutter bags and raise security questions;

  • Making sure all liquids meet the 3-1-1 standard (3.4 oz bottle or less; 1 quart-sized, clear, plastic, zip-top bag; 1 bag per passenger); and

  • Noting that there are special requirements for formula, breast milk, and juice if you are traveling with an infant.If you’re traveling with an infant.

While it’s too late now, consumers should consider applying for a TSA Pre-Check to dramatically reduce their security clearance time on future flights. On top of shorter lines, Pre-Check flyers also gain the benefit of not having to remove shoes, the 3-1-1 liquids bag, laptops, light outerwear jackets, or belts.

Catch up on all the airline changes

If you’re flying through Denver over the holidays, you might get to try out a new screening system.

In partnership with the TSA, Denver International Airport (DEN) -- named a favorite in a recent consumer satisfaction survey of airports -- is the first U.S. airport to try out a new breed of checkpoint security screening called Enhanced Advanced Imaging Technology (eAIT).

The new system has several pluses, like easier screening for flyers with mobility issues, but the one passengers will probably like most is that instead of holding their arms over their heads, they can keep them down and close to their sides when going through the body scanner. The new technology reduces scan time to under a second.

If the Denver test run is successful, TSA might add the new screening technology at other airports.

Airlines have gone through a lot of changes in 2018 -- from how service animals are dealt with to new standards for seats. To catch up on all airline-related consumer news, check out ConsumerAffairs Airline and Airport News section.

It’s the holiday season, and the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) is expecting a sleighful of flyers. Between December 19 and January 5, the ag...

Article Image

Delta eliminating zones from boarding process

In an effort to minimize delays and speed up the passenger loading process, Delta Air Lines has revamped its boarding process. Starting January 23, Delta will switch from zone boarding to a new process based on ticket type and color.

Each fare tier -- including business class, first class, premium economy, Comfort+, main cabin, and basic economy -- will be assigned a different color. The colors associated with each fare class will be displayed on screens and signs at the gate prior to boarding.

Delta will still board passengers that need extra time first, then board premium passengers sitting its Delta One suites. Delta Comfort+ passengers will board ahead of Platinum and Gold Medallions who are seated in the Main Cabin.

"SkyMiles Medallion Members and eligible Delta SkyMiles American Express credit card members will continue to receive priority boarding,” Delta said.

After that, Delta will board economy passengers by announcing Main Cabin 1 through 3, instead of Zone 1 through 4 as it did previously. The last group to board will be Basic Economy, previously called Zone 4.

With the alterations, the airline said it hopes to "encourage fewer customers to line up in the gate area.”

“We have been listening to our customers about the stress they often feel at the gate before boarding, and implementing small changes for years,” said Delta chief marketing officer Tim Mapes in a statement. The new system “is designed to better link the Delta product they purchased to differentiated experiences throughout their journey.”

In an effort to minimize delays and speed up the passenger loading process, Delta Air Lines has revamped its boarding process. Starting January 23, Delta w...

Article Image

Delta will no longer permit emotional support animals on long flights

Starting December 18, travelers flying with Delta Air Lines will no longer be allowed to bring emotional support animals on flights longer than eight hours.

Delta also announced on Monday that it’s tightening its rules for kittens and puppies. Animals under 4 months of age won’t be allowed to fly no matter how long the flight is.

“These updates support Delta’s commitment to safety and also protect the rights of customers with documented needs — such as veterans with disabilities — to travel with trained service and support animals,” said John Laughter, Delta’s senior vice president for corporate safety, security and compliance.

Tightening rules on animals

The airline’s updated pet policy follow a number of incidents involving pets on airplanes. In August 2017, a puppy in good health was shipped via Delta Air Lines from Kansas City, Missouri to Rhode Island with a layover in Detroit.

Upon arrival in Detroit, “the puppy was unloaded and noticed unresponsive.” The puppy was later pronounced dead “from acute myocardial necrosis,” a condition caused by oxygen deprivation.

Since 2005, United Airlines and Delta have amassed the highest numbers of reported animal deaths, at 86 and 84 respectively.

Delta said it changed its animal policy after finding an 84 percent increase in reported incidents involving service and support animals in 2016 and 2017, “including urination/defecation, biting, and even a widely reported attack by a 70-pound dog.”

Delta said it will allow exceptions to its new pet policy until February 1 for customers who already bought a ticket and asked to bring a support animal.

Starting December 18, travelers flying with Delta Air Lines will no longer be allowed to bring emotional support animals on flights longer than eight hours...

Article Image

How often are airlines breaking or losing passengers’ wheelchairs? They won’t be able to keep that data secret for much longer

Like many other consumer horror stories that end in a corporate apology, it took the work of incensed social media users for JetBlue to publicly acknowledge that it shouldn't have given a passenger’s custom wheelchair away to the wrong person.

“The customer did not have the experience we want to provide to our customers who use wheelchairs and we’ve apologized to her for the stress and inconvenience this situation caused,” JetBlue’s press team tells ConsumerAffairs in a prepared statement.

The nightmare for the passenger and writer who goes by the pseudonym “Coffee Spoonie” on Twitter began on November 7, when she told her 19,000 followers that she was stranded on a JetBlue airplane because staff couldn’t find her custom-built wheelchair after they mistakenly gave it to someone else.

Then they found the chair and returned it to her -- with damages that made it impossible to use. On their official corporate Twitter account, JetBlue publicly responded that she should file a claim for a repair through their “business partner,” a third-party contractor. But the contractor demanded payment from Spoonie’s health insurer for the repair, she later said online.

The social media outrage from her followers and others who testified to similar experiences was swift, and the following day, Spoonie posted that JetBlue had changed course, with a promise to have the wheelchair repaired through a different contractor and a heartfelt-sounding apology over the phone.

“In investigating the incident, we learned that another customer on the same flight mistakenly identified the wheelchair as their own and was escorted in it to the baggage claim by one of our business partners,” JetBlue says of the incident in a statement to ConsumerAffairs.

The statement does not specify how the wheelchair became damaged or answer whether it is typical for JetBlue’s business partners to demand payment from health insurers before fixing broken wheelchairs.

“We have addressed any concerns regarding insurance with our business partners and the chair is being repaired,” JetBlue’s statement concludes.

The ordeal sparked numerous other people to share their own stories of broken or lost wheelchairs. But starting next month, the flying public won’t be limited to viral social media posts to discover how often incidents like this happen.

Flying while disabled

When it comes to air travel complaints, it’s the rare people trying to board with an emotional support peacock or squirrel who tend to grab the most headlines and vows from airlines to crack down.

Meanwhile, a far more common flying nightmare has gone ignored by airlines for years; customers with disabilities say that they are regularly mistreated during air travel, with one of the more common problems being airline staff that lose or break their personal wheelchairs -- leaving passengers who can’t walk completely stranded and without a medical device worth thousands of dollars.

Evidence that airline staff treat wheelchairs no more delicately -- or potentially worse -- than the suitcases they are checked with has only been available anecdotally. Unlike lost or mishandled luggage, wheelchair damage doesn’t come with its own reporting requirements under federal law.

Outspoken travelers and wheelchair users like Senator Tammy Duckworth, the Illinois Democrat and former lieutenant colonel who lost her legs in the Iraq war in 2004, have traditionally been the public’s only window into the issue.

"On a recent trip, I retrieved my wheelchair at the end of the jet bridge, but a titanium rod had been damaged during the flight and my chair literally broke apart while I was sitting in it," Duckworth wrote last year in a letter to Department of Transportation (DOT) Secretary Elaine Chao, asking that the agency do more to monitor airlines’ treatment of disabled passengers.

Last year, the Government Accountability Office, the independent federal watchdog agency, finally looked into the issue. It found that disability-related complaints related to air travel doubled from 2005 to 2015, reaching over 30,000 complaints for the most recent year that data was available.

Advocates say that the problem can be traced to shrinking seats, crowded or overbooked planes, and other side effects of an industry that has become increasingly consolidated and unfriendly to consumers.   

Transparency through litigation

In late 2016, the Obama administration finally promised some reprieve to fliers traveling with wheelchairs in the form of transparency. The outgoing administration said that by 2018, all United States airlines would be required “to report on how often they mishandle wheelchairs so air travelers with disabilities can easily compare carriers and make informed travel decisions.”

But after agreeing to the changes, the airline industry predictably asked that the new rules be put on hold under the Trump administration.

“Industry is facing some real challenges with both parts of this regulation and will need more time to implement it,” a lobbyist with Airlines for America, the group that represents most major airlines, reportedly said in an email to the Department of Transportation (DOT) under the new administration in March 2017.

The following day, the DOT announced that it would delay the wheelchair rule until January 2019 -- without giving the advocacy groups and other stakeholders who had worked on the issue for five years a public hearing or chance to comment.

The advocacy group Paralyzed Veterans of America (PVA) promptly sued and is now celebrating a recent announcement from the DOT that all airlines will be expected to publicly disclose their wheelchair mishandling complaints by December 4.

“We applaud the DOT for finally implementing the new rule,” Carl Blake, executive director of PVA, said in a October 29 announcement. They say that the DOT’s decision came after appeals court judges took the agency to task for delaying the wheelchair rule without so much as a hearing

Advocacy group Democracy Forward, which represented the PVA in the lawsuit, says that the new rule will fill what has otherwise been a “data desert” when it comes to flying with a wheelchair.

“Until the rule goes into effect December 4 of this year, there really was no way to actually track how often airlines were damaging or losing wheelchairs,” Democracy Forward spokesman Charisma Troiano tell ConsumerAffairs.

Troiano expects airlines to comply, though the DOT rules allow airlines the chance to delay if they can submit a detailed explanation about why that’s necessary.

ConsumerAffairs questioned five major airlines -- United, Delta, Southwest,  American, and JetBlue -- about their plans in regards to the wheelchair rule. The press teams for all of the airlines except JetBlue said they plan to comply and publicly report wheelchair mishandling complaints by the December 4 deadline.

While JetBlue’s press team did not answer repeated questions about the wheelchair rule, Airlines for America spokesman Alison McAfee says via email that the industry group’s members “are committed to being compliant with the Wheelchair Rule by the deadline.”

More changes need for overall accountability

Though the PVA and Democracy Forward applauded the measure, their advocacy work indicates that more systemic changes are still needed.  In a separate lawsuit, PVA is calling for better access for disabled passengers to use the restroom on flights, an issue that travelers like John Morris of WheelTravel.org has described as an “accessibility nightmare.”

And while airlines are already required to publicly disclose other issues like lost luggage or injured or killed pets, that hasn’t stopped such stories from regularly repeating themselves.

When it comes to pet deaths, airlines typically deny culpability in their government-mandated public reports.

“I have not seen an instance in which the airline determined that they did something wrong,” an Animal Legal Defense Fund attorney said in an interview last year about United Airlines’ own troubling history with pet deaths.

What’s more, federal laws have long protected airlines from getting sued by passengers with civil rights complaints. As the air travel guide Points Guy recently noted in an article about flying while disabled, courts have repeatedly ruled that consumers have to file such complaints with the DOT instead.

Previously, the DOT’s fines levied on airlines have been few and far between -- and the money doesn’t always go back to the affected passengers.

“You cannot sue an airline for any of this,” Kelly Buckland, a wheelchair user executive director of the National Council for Independent Living, told The Points Guy. “You’re entirely dependent on the Department of Transportation. We need to be able to hold them accountable.”

Like many other consumer horror stories that end in a corporate apology, it took the work of incensed social media users for JetBlue to publicly acknowledg...

Article Image

United Airlines nearly contaminated travelers’ food with Listeria, lawsuit claims

Several months ago, on August 31, United Airlines had a seemingly innocuous announcement. Listeria, a nasty food-borne pathogen, was found in a kitchen cooler at a United Airlines catering facility in Newark, New Jersey. It never touched food and the bacteria was quickly contained, the airline added.

A new lawsuit filed by a group of employees now alleges that there was much more to that story. The employees at the United Airlines catering facility in Newark say that the kitchen cooler tested positive for Listeria on numerous occasions, dating back to September 2017. The plaintiffs say that United refused to stop distributing the food due to “business concerns.”

Some strains of Listeria are worse than others. The monocytogene strain of Listeria, or L. mono, can cause stillbirths and other serious health complications for vulnerable people. An estimated 260 people in the United States die each year from exposure to the strain.

Evidence of L. Mono contamination was found at the United Newark catering operation in February 2018, according to internal documents that employees shared with CNBC. A cooler tested positive for the strain again in August.

United Airlines’ press team responded to the allegations, telling CNBC that the Listeria strain found in September 2017 wasn't a dangerous variation. As for the evidence of L. Mono, United told CNBC that it took “appropriate actions” to contain the dangerous pathogen. Those actions included cleaning the area more thoroughly and retesting the facility, according to United.

But food safety experts told CNBC that when dangerous strains of Listeria are found, the best course of action is to shut down a kitchen completely.  They were not impressed with United’s professed response.

Meanwhile, the employee lawsuit says that when one manager finally shut down the troubled cooler himself, he was reassigned to a different city and forced to do "make-work assignments" to keep him busy. Another employee says that she were forced to resign over the conditions.

The Newark catering facility is the airline’s largest, serving 45,000 meals a day on domestic and international flights.

In a statement to ConsumerAffairs, United Airlines spokesman Frank Benenati says that the claims made in the lawsuit and in the CNBC report are "misleading, inaccurate and in many cases, outright false."

"We look forward to defending ourselves in a court of law and will be filing substantive responses soon," he says.  

Several months ago, on August 31, United Airlines had a seemingly innocuous announcement. Listeria, a nasty food-borne pathogen, was found in a kitchen coo...

Article Image

JetBlue’s founder crafts new, tech-centric airline

Come 2021, fliers will have a new, low-cost, tech-oriented airline pioneered by JetBlue’s founder David Neeleman.

His angle?

Flying “hundreds of routes” that the airline will likely have all to itself, according to a recent interview Neeleman did with Skift.

Most, if not all, of those routes will be U.S.to Europe and South America, concentrating on origination cities that are competition-free and leisure destinations, or where there’s an abundance of flier friends or family.

As examples, he used Scranton, Pennsylvania -- a market with a metro population of 570,000 and flights that are mostly connectors to Chicago, Washington D.C., Charlotte, Chicago, and Philadelphia -- and Florida, where there’s an abundance of potential fliers who have friends or family in Brazil.

Using the 130- to 160-seat Airbus A220-300, Neeleman’s brainchild will have the ability to take off from “really short runways, and can fly for 11 hours (and) we’ll get you there twice as fast and for half the price,” he told Skift.

The Airbus plays right into Neeleman’s plans as a differentiator. Compared to how most of the low-cost carriers are configured, the A220 has large, rotating overhead storage bins, a wider aisle that allows for faster passenger boarding and disembarking, and the ability to have first class, lie-flat business class, and extra legroom seats if that’s something Neeleman wants to make happen.

“I’ll just do stuff they can’t do,” Neeleman said, throwing down the gauntlet to the other carriers.

“You don’t have to speak to us”

Neeleman’s current plans have Salt Lake City, Utah as the technical and customer service hub for the airline, but if you’re a flier who depends on the human touch, you should call someone else.

“You don’t have to speak to us. You won’t be able to speak to us,” Neeleman said. “You won’t be able to call us because everything will be functional.”

His reasoning? Neeleman makes a good point that, in today’s world, a lot of consumer-to-company connecting is done via an app or a computer. He figures consumers are content with that setup since relatively few people ever call, say, Amazon or Uber.

If a customer has an issue they can’t work out on their own, they’ll have to use the online chat, but agents can always call the customer in a pinch. However, fliers should expect everything else -- from booking, changing, and cancelling flights to check-in to ordering meals -- to be done through the airline’s app.

“I don’t think people want to stand in line to talk to someone,” said Neeleman when asked if he feared the human element of customer service would be weakened by technology.

Are you sure you can pull this off, David?

While there’s no substantiation that Neeleman can pull off all of his promises, his track record shows he has the ability to make it happen.

In 1984, he co-founded Morris Air, a low-fare charter airline, then sold it to Southwest Airlines for $130 million. He then turned Open Skies, a touch screen airline reservation and check-in systems company, into a winner acquired by Hewlett-Packard.

Next on his checklist was WestJet, now Canada’s second largest airline; then he moved on to JetBlue, where he scored major customer-sensitive kudos. Most recently, Neeleman’s domestic carrier Azul (Portuguese for "blue") became the fourth largest airline in South America.

Come 2021, fliers will have a new, low-cost, tech-oriented airline pioneered by JetBlue’s founder David Neeleman.His angle?Flying “hundreds of rout...

Article Image

American Airlines on course to raise revenue from passenger perks

Would you like some legroom with that seat? Perhaps a glass of wine?

Anyone who’s flown in the last few years knows that airlines are upselling anything they can get their hands on. And the airlines are seeing green as a result of those monetized perks.

American Airlines, the U.S.’ largest passenger carrier, just released it third quarter 2018 earnings report, showing a net profit of $341 million. However, the price of oil puts a hurt on all airlines and American, for one, felt it.

American sees the way to boost its profit margin is through branded fare products like seat upgrades. The company is seeing a 50 percent upsell rate to more expensive branded fare products and has decided to see if fliers are willing to up that profit margin even more.

“We've actually done a pretty good job of growing our ancillary revenue stream,” American’s SVP of Revenue Donald Casey said in a third quarter earnings call.

“In the third quarter, ancillary revenues are up 18%. We re-launched our Main Cabin Extra product in June. And since we've done that we've seen unit revenues for Main Cabin Extra grow at 24%, but we see that we actually have more opportunity beyond that.”

Airlines continue to ask for more

American is not the only airline trying to leverage added passenger revenue. Almost all airlines have gone to upselling more comfortable seats and extra legroom, a particular painful point with passengers given the fact that the average distance between rows has shrunk from 35 to 31 inches over the last two decades.

But analysts say that asking passengers to pay for perks helps the larger carriers -- like Delta, American, and United -- to keep fares competitive, and ancillary revenue is becoming the go-to rather than charging more for tickets.

“I think that's a big window where we can put and show many offers in front of our customers to increase our ancillary revenue stream even more than we've been able to go do it,” American’s Casey went on to say.

The best way for fliers to get free perks?  

So, what is the best way for fliers to avoid all of these extra charges? According to airline officials, it’s by signing up for airline-branded credit cards.

“There remains strong competition among the 3 (United, American, Delta) for co-branded credit card accounts, which is always a good thing for consumers,” Jay Sorensen, President of Product, Partnership and Marketing Practice for IdeaWorksCompany told ConsumerAffairs.

“These remain the singular best method for travelers to insulate themselves from a la carte fees,” said Sorensen.

Would you like some legroom with that seat? Perhaps a glass of wine?Anyone who’s flown in the last few years knows that airlines are upselling anything...

Article Image

Airline passengers speak up about what they want

The International Air Transport Association (IATA) has released the results from its latest Global Passenger Survey (GPS), and all arrows point to maximizing the ever-changing digital world of the consumer.

After combing through the 10,000+ responses, the overriding takeaway from the survey was airline customers wanting a “seamless journey” -- and they’d like most of that seamlessness in digital form.

The flier’s message to the airlines is clear. As one of the survey respondents said, “Let us travel simple and efficient, conscious and paperless.” “Fast, intuitive and self-serviced airports experience is what we want,” said another.

“Air travel is expected to double by 2036, the industry will not be able to handle the growth or evolving customer expectations with the current processes, installations and ways of doing business,” commented Nick Careen, IATA's Senior Vice President, Airport, Passenger, Cargo and Security.

What passengers want from booking to landing

“The GPS tells us that passengers want a seamless and secure travel experience from booking to arrival. It’s a tall order because airlines have to coordinate with a mix of governments, regulators, airports, and technology companies to get it done,” Careen added.

Fliers aren’t shy about voicing their concern over the chaos of the boarding process, either. More than 40 percent said that availability of overhead space for carry-on bags would definitely improve the boarding experience.

Seating has become a thorny issue -- something not lost on the U.S. Congress, which told the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) in no uncertain terms to set minimum standards for width of seats and legroom.

But once passengers get buckled in, they want to be able to craft their travel experience from their seat. Common features such as the ability to make changes to their flight, get updates on gate info, choose entertainment and food options, make sure their baggage is going to the same place they are, and complete e-declarations for border processing (if required) are high on travelers’ wish lists.

And when they’ve landed, they would like personalized destination services, including:

  • Baggage pick up location and delivery time notifications

  • Pre-vetted at security checks based on travel patterns and profile information supplied by entities at the departing airport

  • Notifications will be sent to the passengers to facilitate transportation, accommodation or other services (e.g. the taxi is waiting at designated curb location)

Interestingly, the IATA survey results regarding seatback vs. personal device entertainment streaming runs counter to what some airlines, like American, have put into play.

The demographic split

Results change a bit where demographic preferences are concerned. Millennials want as much information as possible delivered digitally, whereas older ones prefer printed versions. That demographic also wants things done lickety-split: less than 30 seconds to drop off baggage at departure and less than 5 minutes to wait for baggage at arrival.

Females surveyed showed preferences for making carry-on baggage their own concern, being able to book a hotel together with the purchase of their flight ticket, and for a paper passport over biometric identification.

The IATA represents 290 airlines which amounts to 82% of total air traffic.

The International Air Transport Association (IATA) has released the results from its latest Global Passenger Survey (GPS), and all arrows point to maximizi...

Article Image

A secretive provision in air travel bill would let cops ‘disrupt’ private drones

Hidden in a new bill that will ban airlines from dragging passengers off overbooked airplanes is a potential threat to private drones.  

The Senate today passed the FAA Reauthorization Act, a bipartisan bill that extends funding for the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and addresses some of consumers’ major gripes about air travel.

But the ACLU and the Electronic Frontier Foundation say they are alarmed about a clause in the bill that has received little attention; a measure giving the federal government the authority to  “disrupt” and “seize or otherwise confiscate” any drone deemed a “credible threat” without a warrant.

“These provisions give the government virtually carte blanche to surveil, seize, or even shoot a drone out of the sky — whether owned by journalists or commercial entities — with no oversight or due process,” an ACLU spokesman told TechCrunch.

Oversight necessary for new provision

Many journalists or citizen activists use drones to document scenes where physical access is not possible. Drone photographers were instrumental in challenging the police narrative at the Standing Rock Sioux protest against the Dakota Access Pipeline two years ago, for instance, documenting what they alleged was a violent, aggressive response from the Morton County Sheriff’s department and other police agencies.

Some footage captured by the drone photographers who were there appeared to show law enforcement officers shooting at the camera. The FAA said at the time they were investigating an instance in which an officer allegedly shot down a drone with a bean bag.

Currently, shooting at drones is considered a federal crime because they are considered aircraft. Law enforcement has “some latitude” to shoot at drones if they are acting out of concern for their safety,  a spokesman from the FAA had told ConsumerAffairs ,”but all such incidents are still subject to investigation."

The new legislation, civil liberties groups warn, would give federal authorities ample latitude to do as they please when they encounter a drone.

“If lawmakers want to give the government the power to hack or destroy private drones, then Congress and the public should have the opportunity to debate how best to provide adequate oversight and limit those powers to protect our right to use drones for journalism, activism, and recreation,” the Electronic Frontier Foundation said.

Hidden in a new bill that will ban airlines from dragging passengers off overbooked airplanes is a potential threat to private drones.  The Senate toda...

Article Image

Congress approves FAA funding bill

The Senate has given final approval to a bill funding the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and sent it to the White House, where President Trump is expected to sign it into law.

The final version of the measure contains some things consumers asked for, but it has failed to provide any relief from airline fees.

Under the new law, the FAA will be required to establish minimum seat size and leg room standards for airlines. The standard for commercial airline seats will include a minimum pitch, establishing the distance between seats.

Consumers have complained in recent years as airlines have reconfigured cabins to include more seats. In July, the consumer group Flyers' Rights petitioned the FAA to require airlines to abide by minimum seat standards, but the agency declined to do so.

The group said tight seating configurations make it difficult for passengers to evacuate an aircraft in the 90 seconds required by FAA regulations. The FAA, however, said its tests -- called questionable by Flyers' Rights -- show that it is possible.

The new law will require the FAA to mandate minimum seat requirements but does not tell the agency how to determine those standards.

Limits on bumping

The new law will also prohibit airlines from bumping a passenger who is already on board the overbooked aircraft. That stems from an incident in 2017 when a passenger who refused to give up his seat was forcibly removed from a United Airlines flight, resulting in injuries.

The new law, however, will not provide relief from the fees that airlines have attached to things that were once provided at no charge.

As it considered the legislation, a Senate committee added language to limit fees for checked bags and changed flights, requiring them to be "reasonable." After a vigorous lobbying campaign by the airline industry, the language about fees was stripped from the bill.

'Missed opportunity'

Sen. Edward Markey (D-Mass.) voted against the measure, saying Congress missed an opportunity to protect consumers from what he called "ridiculous fees."

“It is Congress’s obligation to protect the public from abusive practices that harm consumers," Markey said. "Instead, after a ferocious lobbying blitz by the airline industry, the airlines won, and passengers lost. The result: airline fees remain sky high and frustration with the modern flying experience continues to grow."

Airlines began adding fees in 2008 when fuel prices were at an all-time high. It enabled airlines to increase profitability without raising advertised fares.

The Senate has given final approval to a bill funding the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and sent it to the White House, where President Trump is ex...

Article Image

Delta Airlines rolls out new pet travel monitoring and tracking technology

Less than a year after pet deaths went unmentioned in Delta’s service animal crackdown, the airline is introducing new technology to improve the monitoring and tracking of pet travel.

While more than a half-million pets are transported by airlines every year, the complaints regarding pets and airlines isn’t even a Top 10 complaint among fliers, according to the U.S.Department of Transportation. Despite that, the number of flight-related pet casualties and injuries in the last year has produced enough bad press to get the airlines’ attention.

Delta Airlines is stepping up to be counted as the first to turn things around.

The airline has struck a deal with CarePod, a new pet technology service that will help the airline’s Delta Cargo arm keep a better bead on a pet’s travel and keep pet owners updated in real-time.

“Demand for pet shipments is strong and we are always looking for ways to create a best-in-class travel experience for pets and their owners,” wrote Shawn Cole, Vice President of Delta Cargo. “Working with a start-up like CarePod allows Delta the flexibility to enhance our service in new and innovative ways. We are able to think big, start small and learn fast to solve specific customer needs.”

Why pet air travel is risky

It’s taken nearly four years of evangelizing for improved pet safety, but Singapore-based CarePod’s patience has paid off. With Delta on board, CarePod has answered one of the three most important areas it feels puts pets at risk when being transported by air: inconsistency.

The new partnership allows consistent care for pet travel, claims CarePod, and Delta is responding with amped up pet-related training of its crews, going as far as educating ground handlers on whose job it is to take care of pets along every point of the journey.

The only two steps left in CarePod’s quest for the perfect pet travel experience are:

  1. Heat -- the most critical factor that can quickly escalate to a “dead-on-arrival” situation

  2. Stress -- unfamiliar visuals plus higher noise levels add more anxiety to an already nervous pet

Delta is answering the heat issue by building out temperature-controlled holding areas in several locations and adding overnight kenneling services. The airline’s new Cargo Control Center in Atlanta will also give the airline non-stop visibility of all pet shipments.

Less than a year after pet deaths went unmentioned in Delta’s service animal crackdown, the airline is introducing new technology to improve the monitoring...

Article Image

Southwest Airlines kicks off its three-day sale

Airlines have begun to raise travel costs again, but Southwest is running counter to that trend, at least for three days.

Consumers who book by October 4 can book some round-trip flights for less than $100. The flights must depart between November 28 and December 19 or from January 3 through February 13.

The discount fares begin at $49 one-way on relatively short flights. As the flights get longer, the fares rise to $79, $99, and $129.

Southwest traditionally offers the sale two times each year in an attempt to fill planes during off-peak travel periods. For example, the fares do not apply for travel during the typically busy Thanksgiving and Christmas holidays.

Exclusions apply

There are other exceptions as well. The discount fares are not available for flights on Fridays and Sundays. There are additional limits on some of the airline's warm weather destinations. All Orange County, California flights are also excluded.

You can check out all the fine print here.

As you start looking at the schedule of eligible flights, you'll also notice they all are non-stop trips. Destinations that require connections aren't part of the promotion, though the airline said that some of the fares may be lower than usual during the promotion periods.

Consumers aren't guaranteed the discount fare, even if they book within the three-day window. Some seats have already been booked by full-fare passengers. Once the remaining seats are booked the flight will be full and unavailable for the promotion.

Travel costs are going up

With rising rule prices, air travel got more expensive over the summer, with several airlines adjusting fees instead of fares. Research has shown that consumers often choose a flight based on the cost of the fare without fully considering the fees involved.

In August, United, Southwest, and JetBlue made fee adjustments, with Southwest increasing its flat $15 for Early Bird Check-In to $15, $20, or $25 per one-way route starting on August 29. What the flier pays is based on the length of the flight and what Southwest considers the popularity of that flight’s Early Bird Check-In.

Last month, Delta increased the fee for the first checked bag to $30 for U.S. domestic travel, an increase of $5. The fee for a second checked bag is $40.

Before choosing a flight, travelers should look at all of the airlines' fees and add the applicable ones to the cost of the fare.

Airlines have begun to raise travel costs again, but Southwest is running counter to that trend, at least for three days.Consumers who book by October...

Article Image

Government will set airline seat standards

Congressional conferees have agreed upon a measure funding the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), and it contains a few perks for air travelers.

The measure funding the agency for the next five years requires the FAA to set minimum standards for the width of seats and for legroom. Currently, airlines can make the configuration of the aircraft cabin as cramped as they like, as long as they meet safety standards.

The measure would also prohibit airlines from involuntarily bumping passengers after they have already boarded a plane. The bill is a compromise between House and Senate versions of the legislation but still must be passed by both houses of Congress.

Consumer advocates wanted the legislation to also bar airlines from imposing "unreasonable" fees but that didn't make it into the compromise version.

Victory for consumers

The provision requiring the FAA to regulate seat size and leg room is a major victory for consumers, and one that is somewhat unexpected. Back in July, the consumer group Flyer's Rights held out little hope it would be included in the FAA reauthorization bill.

“We call it torture class,” Paul Hudson, FlyersRights.org’s president, recently told The Telegraph of London. “It has been going on for the last 10 to 15 years, seats have been getting smaller as people get larger. Our view is they have been shrinking seats to get more passengers on a plane to get more revenue. They are also trying to make it so uncomfortable that people will upgrade and pay far higher fares.”

In fact, the FAA had previously declined to tell airlines how large the seats had to be and how much legroom they should give passengers. Congress, however, appears to be forcing their hand.

Despite the apparent benefits for consumers in the legislation, the airline industry appears to be happy with it. The trade group Airlines for America urged lawmakers to quickly pass the compromise reauthorization bill, noting it contains a lot of money to support commercial aviation.

Support from industry

"The long-term reauthorization is essential for the FAA to advance projects and implement programs that advance our country's status as the safest, most efficient aerospace system in the world," said Airlines for America CEO Nicholas Calio.

He said the bill will give employers, manufacturers, and consumers the certainty required to keep building and investing in the U.S. aviation industry.

Senate Commerce Committee Chairman John Thune (R-S.D.) said he expects Congressional passage of the bill before FAA funding expires September 30.

Congressional conferees have agreed upon a measure funding the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), and it contains a few perks for air travelers.The...

Article Image

Customer satisfaction with airports reaches an all-time high

As satisfaction with airlines continues to grow, U.S. airports are also feeling the love. In a newly released J.D. Power airport satisfaction study, fliers gave the five areas studied -- check-in; food, beverage and retail; accessibility; terminal facilities; and baggage claim -- a big thumbs-up.

All told, overall passenger satisfaction got a 12-point kiss from 2017’s study, garnering a score of 761 (on a 1,000-point scale).

The winners were Las Vegas McCarran International Airport and Orlando International Airport, which tied for first place in passenger satisfaction among mega airports, followed by Detroit Metropolitan Wayne County Airport and Denver International Airport.

For other size-tiered airports, John Wayne Airport, Orange County, Dallas Love Field, Portland (Ore.) International Airport, Buffalo Niagara International Airport, Indianapolis International Airport, and Fort Myers/Southwest Florida International all won out as passenger favorites.

Bringing up the rear in satisfaction were New York’s LaGuardia, Kahului Airport on Maui, and Newark Liberty. However, LaGuardia’s marks are likely to change once its renovation is completed.

A long time coming

"North America airports have been doing a tremendous job managing passenger volume, adding amenities, and keeping travelers moving despite some noteworthy challenges, but they will be put to the true test over the next few years," said Michael Taylor, Travel Practice Lead at J.D. Power.

In comments to ConsumerAffairs, Skift’s Aviation Business Editor Brian Sumers echoed Taylor’s view.

“For a long time, U.S. airports didn't have much money. They get the bulk of their money from airlines, who pay rent, and from customers, who buy things,” commented Sumers. “After the recession, fewer people were traveling, and airports lost some of their revenue stream. That started changing about seven years ago, as newly healthy airlines started adding more seats into the marketplace, and paying more money in rent. Many airports became flush with cash, and they started using it to fund customer-friendly renovations. A lot of those renovated terminals are finally opening.”

What fliers like most

Some of the key findings of the J.D. Power study include:

  • Outsmarting human nature: Despite the continued hand-wringing over paying extra for baggage, the airport experience with check-in/baggage check got the highest marks. J.D. Power reports that metric has been rising consistently since airports began implementing self-service kiosks and bag tagging which, in turn, lowered passenger frustration over waiting for someone else to facilitate that process.

  • Overall satisfaction reaches all-time high: Overall customer satisfaction is at an all-time high, mostly driven by a 17-point uptick in satisfaction with food, beverage and retail, and an 18-point increase in satisfaction with security check.

  • Better airport/TSA communication improves security check satisfaction: Thanks to  improved communication and cooperation between airport and TSA staff, passenger satisfaction with the security process saw an 18-point increase.

“It's a good time to be hang out at a U.S. airport,” Sumers told ConsumerAffairs. “Many have renovated their terminals and have focused on adding customer-friendly enhancements like new restaurants, lounges, and more comfortable seating. The restaurants are more often local -- rather than national chains -- and they offer more healthy options than before.”

It’s interesting to note that many of the airports passengers favorited are smoke-free. While smoking policies were in flux a year ago, the American Nonsmokers’ Rights Foundation reports as of April 1, 2018, 30 of the top 35 U.S. airports are 100 percent smoke-free indoors. Airports are also keeping a pretty tight lid on the allowed use of electronic cigarettes, with 23 of the top 35 U.S. airports banning the use of electronic cigarettes indoors.

As satisfaction with airlines continues to grow, U.S. airports are also feeling the love. In a newly released J.D. Power airport satisfaction study, fliers...

Article Image

United announces new boarding process to help with overcrowding

With overcrowded flights comes overcrowded gates, and United Airlines is working to alleviate that issue for its customers.

Recently, customers have been vocal about the issues at the boarding gates, complaining to United that arriving passengers were greeted at the gate by masses of travelers, while others are spilling out into neighboring hallways.

“It’s too congested,” said Maria Walter, United Airlines’ managing director of global operations strategy. “It created a lot of angst for our customers.”

The new system

This week, United started boarding passengers with a new system, as the company works to keep crowds under control and ensure that flights take off on-time.

Where there were once five boarding lines, United has reduced that down to just two color-coded lines -- lane one is the blue lane and lane two is the green lane. The airline is urging travelers to wait until their boarding group -- one through five -- is called before making their way to the lanes.

Additionally, United has altered its pre-boarding routine to smooth things along. Now, United’s Premier 1K and Global Services frequent flyers will join military personnel, passengers with disabilities, and passengers with young children in pre-boarding. This group will board in lane one.

First-class, business-class, Platinum, and Gold-level frequent flyers will board in group one -- also through lane one. At this time, those in boarding group two will be permitted to line up in lane two.

Once group one has had their boarding passes scanned, group two will begin the boarding process. Silver-level frequent flyers, United credit card holders, and those who have purchased priority access or boarding privileges will be assigned to group two.

At this time, groups three through five will not be permitted to enter the boarding area until board group two has left the line. Groups three through five will then be called -- in order -- and will board through lane two. Most Basic Economy passengers will be in boarding group five.

Keeping crowds under control

To help with travelers crowding the gate, United is now alerting passengers when boarding begins with a notification on their phones. All travelers will receive the alert once the first boarding pass for that particular flight has been scanned.

According to Walter, some flights had passengers congregating in the boarding area for over an hour. She also said that travelers are drawn to lines, so what starts out small can grow to quite a crowd rather quickly. “It’s like a magnet,” she said.

United spent the last year testing this new boarding method on over 12,000 flights around the world, gauging customer feedback along the way. The new boarding system now makes United more similar to both American Airlines and Delta, whereas Southwest’s unassigned seating setup allows passengers to board based on when they check-in or their loyalty status level.

With overcrowded flights comes overcrowded gates, and United Airlines is working to alleviate that issue for its customers.Recently, customers have bee...

Article Image

Airlines waiving fees before Hurricane Florence

Ahead of the arrival of Hurricane Florence on the East Coast, several airlines have announced that they will waive ticket change fees for customers who need to change their travel plans due to the storm’s predicted path.

Change fees normally set customers back around $200 plus a difference in fare, CNBC reports. However, Delta, United, Southwest and other big airlines say they will waive change fees or fare differences ahead of the impending storm.

Carriers said many flights are likely to be affected by the hurricane, which is expected to make landfall at the end of this week as a Category 4 with sustained winds of 130 m.p.h.

Affected cities

Southwest Airlines announced in a travel advisory that because of Hurricane Florence, flights going to and from nine airports along the east coast could be canceled, delayed, or diverted. The airline said following airports could be affected by the storm:

  • Baltimore/Washington (BWI)

  • Charleston, SC (CHS)

  • Charlotte, NC (CLT)

  • Greenville-Spartanburg, SC (GSP)

  • Norfolk/Virginia Beach, VA (ORF)

  • Raleigh/Durham, NC (RDU)

  • Richmond, VA (RIC)

  • Washington Dulles International (IAD)

  • Washington, D.C. (Reagan National–DCA)

Airlines waiving fees

Southwest said passengers booked into six cities in South Carolina, North Carolina, and Virginia can re-book their flights within 14 days of their original dates with no additional cost.

Delta says travelers booked to and from airports from Virginia to Georgia won’t be charged change fees. United also announced that it will waive date-change fees and fare differences for travelers booked to or from 16 area airports if they were booked to fly between September 10 and September 16.

JetBlue announced that it will waive change and cancel fees and fare differences for customers traveling from September 13 to September 15 in five cities in the Southeast.

As of 11 a.m. ET, 192 flights to, from, and within the U.S. have been cancelled for today; 362 flights for tomorrow have already been canceled due to the storm’s predicted path, according to flight-tracking service FlightAware.

FlightAware said it expects those numbers to rise significantly over the next 24 hours as the storm approaches and airlines finalize their plans.

Ahead of the arrival of Hurricane Florence on the East Coast, several airlines have announced that they will waive ticket change fees for customers who nee...

Article Image

American Airlines rolls out free live TV for its passengers

Already the only U.S. airline to offer live TV on international flights, American Airlines is rolling out free TV for its domestic passengers.

The airline announced that it’s flipping the switch on 100 domestic aircraft to start, with plans to keep growing both live TV and high-speed internet to more than 700 of its planes during 2019. The service results from a partnership with DISH, and it will reportedly costAmerican $12.3 billion to modernize its fleet to make the idea a reality.

“Our customers have told us they want a living room experience in the air -- the ability to watch free entertainment, stream their favorite shows on-demand, charge their phones and stay connected from start to finish during their travels,” said Kurt Stache, American’s Senior Vice President for Marketing, Loyalty & Sales.

Fliers will be able to access the streams via laptops, smartphones, or tablets and will have 12 live TV channels to choose from. These include:

  • Bravo

  • CBS

  • CNBC

  • CNN

  • Disney Channel

  • ESPN

  • FOX

  • NBC

  • NFL Network

  • Telemundo

  • TNT

  • USA

The airlines are paying attention

It’s true that fliers might feel nickel-and-dimed, but the airlines have caught on that the shift to personal digital devices is a chance to offer more for less, be it electric power outlets, Wi-Fi, or on-demand video.

“American’s vision aligns with internet-user trends that are a reality both on the ground and in the air,” Access Intel’s Woodrow Bellamy III told ConsumerAffairs.

“Just look at the numbers: Cisco’s latest mobile data traffic forecast, for example, predicts that 78% of global mobile data traffic will be the consumption of video by 2021. That’s a tough metric not to take advantage of.”

The shape of things to come

In-flight TV and movie entertainment has been around for a couple of decades -- starting with those neck-craning overhead screen versions to the embedded seatback versions the airlines offer now.

“Seatback entertainment screens are so 2002,” wrote Skift in its recent airline innovation report. “Airlines should remove them and focus on what their highest-value travelers actually want — fast, reliable Wi-Fi. Passengers who care about quality entertainment can load up their own devices with stuff they actually want to watch. Or they can stream from a server on the plane.”

Switching from seatback screens to passenger devices will take some time, but the shakeout is in high gear.

How do other airlines stack up with American’s new offer?

Southwest is currently offering a free TV promotion, but it has plans to raise that to $5 at some point.

United has partnered with DIRECTV to offer its coach passengers a package of movies and TV shows ranging in price from $4.99 to $7.00 depending on the length of the flight and when the package is purchased.

Delta offers free streaming on seatback monitors as well as digital devices that use the Delta Studio app.

Already the only U.S. airline to offer live TV on international flights, American Airlines is rolling out free TV for its domestic passengers.The airli...

Article Image

United raises checked bag fee to $30

United Airlines announced on Friday it will be joining fellow major airline JetBlue in raising passengers’ checked bag fees. Passengers will now be charged $30 for their first bag and $40 for a second checked bag.

United announced these changes right before Labor Day Weekend, and the price increase went into effect on all flights -- to and from North America, Central America, and the Caribbean -- on or after August 31st. Prior to the change, passengers were charged $25 for their first checked bag and $30 for their second checked bag.

“As we continue to make investments that make travel on United better, we are making adjustments to our checked bag fees in select markets -- most of which have not been changed for the past eight years,” a United Airlines spokesperson said. “These changes allow us to continue investing in the overall customer experience in today’s marketplace.”

The airline also added that customers who purchase their tickets with a MileagePlus credit card or who have MileagePlus Premier status will still receive complimentary checked bags.

Following suit

United’s price increase comes just a few weeks after JetBlue announced a price hike for its checked bag fees.

As of August 27, JetBlue passengers are charged $30 for their first checked bag and $40 for their second -- up from $25 and $35, respectively. Passengers that have a third bag will be charged $150 -- up from $100.

In a conference call with reporters in July, JetBlue said it is looking to cut costs by up to $300 million a year by 2020, and as such, will be implementing several new initiatives to boost “ancillary revenue.”

With fuel costs on the rise, several airlines are working to institute new efforts to bring in more money. United will soon start charging for certain economy seats, while American Airlines announced it will be cancelling several of its money-losing flights to China. Southwest will be increasing the price of its EarlyBird boarding fee from a flat rate of $15 to $15, $20, or $25 per one-way route.

Consumer response

Upon hearing the news of United raising its checked bag fee, many displeased consumers took to Twitter to voice their frustrations.

“Seriously United a bag fee increase? For those of us who check bags and board easily, you SHOULD be charging those who carry on and slow down the entire process or those who carry the bag to the gate and get their bag for free #unfair #baggageproblems,” one user wrote.

“United really grateful for the upgrades to customer experience that result from charging more for checked bags,” another user tweeted. “Those upgrades are what exactly?”

United Airlines announced on Friday it will be joining fellow major airline JetBlue in raising passengers’ checked bag fees. Passengers will now be charged...

Article Image

The airline industry continues shifting its revenue stream toward ancillary income

What’s included in the fares consumers pay for airline tickets has become a can of worms over the last few years. What presents itself to the consumer as a $100 fare can easily wind up as $140 by the time "additional fees and taxes" are tagged on.

Then, if you want a certain seat, to carry on a bag, or board the plane in the first group, you could easily run that $140 charge up to $200 or more.

There’s no doubt that the ecosystem of running an airline is complex. There’s fuel, regulations, maintenance, ticketing, and layers upon layers of people trying to make customers happy and the planes get from point A to point B.

There’s also picking out the routes that will create the most return on investment (ROI) and making sure the airline has the deal everyone wants.

What airline has the most add-on fees?

In its annual ancillary revenue rankings, the IdeaWorksCompany found the top 10 most expensive carriers based on average fees charged per passenger were as follows:

  1. Spirit: $51 per passenger

  2. WOW Air: $49 per passenger

  3. Allegiant: $49 per passenger

  4. Frontier: $48 per passenger

  5. Jet2.com: $43 per passenger

  6. Qantas Airways: $43 per passenger

  7. United: $39 per passenger

  8. AirAsia X: $33 per passenger

  9. HK Express: $33 per passenger

  10. Wizz Air: $31 per passenger

Scanning that list, you probably noticed that most of those airlines are small, regional, no-frills types.

"Consumers in the US enjoy far lower fares courtesy of the presence of Spirit, Frontier, and Sun Country,” Jay Sorensen, President of Product, Partnership and Marketing Practice for IdeaWorksCompany told ConsumerAffairs.

"These low fare airlines rely upon two revenue streams - fares and ancillary revenue. Now to be certain, the latter must be provided using transparent and fair methods. There have certainly been abuses in terms of transparency and fairness by LCCs. But I confess, if you complete the booking process at the Spirit Airlines website and are surprised by bag fees being charged at the airport for large carry-ons… well, you are intellectually challenged."

So, ancillary revenue is a good thing?

IdeaWorksCompany further defines ancillary revenue using these categories: 1) a la carte features, 2) commission-based products, 3) frequent flyer activities, 4) miscellaneous sources such as advertising, and 5) the a la carte components associated with a fare or product bundle.

If you take a close look at IdeaWorks report, your eyes might widen when you see that United, Delta, and American all took in more than $5 billion in ancillary revenue last year in the way of a la carte features, commission-based products, and frequent flyer activities.

But, in the long run, that extra revenue stream can be a good thing for the customer.

If an airline can keep its fares competitive and pick up enough money from its side hustles -- baggage fees, seat assignments, and the like -- then it’s on the consumer to decide how much the perks are worth and if they really need that extra four inches of legroom.

Do the homework

When looking for a fare, think about what you want versus what you need. Is it a free checked bag? If so, then Southwest may be your answer. Need a seat toward the front of the plane? United has a new plan you may want to try out.

"If you can survive with a smaller bag as a carry-on -- you can save that expense," said Sorensen. "Ditto for seat assignments. Consumers are usually best served by applying for the carrier's co-branded credit card and relying on the customary offer of a free checked bag."

Is the government on the consumer’s side?

Senators Edward J. Markey (D-Mass.) and Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.) called on Congress in 2017 to pass legislation to ground exorbitant airline fees in light of a newly-released Government Accountability Office (GAO) report confirming that many airlines do not consider the costs of the services provided when pricing their airline fees.

"This report confirms what countless passengers across the country already know to be true – that airlines are nickel and diming captive passengers to line their pockets, not to cover the costs of the services provided," said Senator Markey.

"GAO’s findings show that many airlines are actually emboldened to increase their fees to match their competitors and actively seek to deceive passengers by offering artificially low fares and then charging exorbitant fees on the back end. It’s time to put a stop to this fee gouging and restore sanity to the skies. It’s time to pass the FAIR Fees Act."

Unless Markey and Blumenthal can get their bill all the way through and signed, there’s not much hope. While the Department of Transportation and Federal Aviation Administration take their jobs seriously in protecting the safety of fliers, those agencies have decided to stay out of the ring when it comes to things like ticket prices and baggage fees.

Before the Obama administration left office, it proposed a requirement that airlines list their baggage fees at the start of the booking process, a measure intended to make shopping for tickets easier and more transparent for consumers. However, when Donald Trump moved into the Oval Office, he scrapped that proposal.

What’s included in the fares consumers pay for airline tickets has become a can of worms over the last few years. What presents itself to the consumer as a...

Article Image

JetBlue increases fees for checked baggage

Starting today, JetBlue passengers will have to pay $30 to check their first bag and $40 to check their second.

Previously, the airline charged $25 and $35 for first and second bag checks, which is what other major airlines also charge. Travelers will have to pay $150 to check a third bag, up from $100.

The price increase comes amid rising airline fuel prices. To help offset rising fuel costs, several airlines have announced efforts to boost revenue by paring down expenses.

Last week, American Airlines announced that it’s eliminating some of its money-losing flights to China. Southwest Airlines announced that it’s increasing the price of its EarlyBird boarding fee from a flat $15 to $15, $20, or $25 per one-way route starting on August 29, 2018. United Airlines will soon start charging for certain economy seat assignments.

On a conference call with reporters in July, JetBlue executives announced that the airline intends to boost “ancillary revenue” through a series of initiatives. JetBlue said it is trying to cut costs by up to $300 million a year by 2020. Earlier this summer, it underwent a company restructuring by “eliminating a number of positions” through layoffs, buyouts, and attrition.

JetBlue’s new fees for checked baggage are listed on its website.

Starting today, JetBlue passengers will have to pay $30 to check their first bag and $40 to check their second. Previously, the airline charged $25 and...

Article Image

For air travelers, now's the best time to get the lowest fare

Summer airfares are some of the highest of the year, but travelers can find some great deals as fares start to fall over the next few weeks..

After reviewing historical data and trends, online travel site CheapOair (an Authorized Partner) predicts average airfares to popular U.S. destinations will drop 9 percent in the next few weeks. The average international fare should be about 7 percent lower.

As travel begins to taper off, the airlines will have to lower fares to keep planes full. The formula they use is likely complicated, but for consumers the equation is fairly simple – hit the airlines' window of vulnerability and travel is cheaper.

Four-week window

CheapOair (an Authorized Partner) projects airfare will be at its lowest point for a four-week period beginning now and lasting through the middle of September. After that, hold onto your wallet because fares will begin to steadily rise until they reach their peak before Thanksgiving.

"Over the past several weeks our team of data scientists completed a thorough analysis of flight trends from every angle possible,” said Sam Jain, CheapOair's (an Authorized Partner) founder and CEO. “Data shows that prices will only go upwards starting around the end of September, so for those who already know they'll be traveling in November and December, don't wait on starting your search for airfare bookings."

The lower fares may come at an opportune time, since several airlines have raised the cost of flying over the summer. Southwest has raised the price of its Early Bird Check-In while JetBlue is adjusting several of its fees, ranging from checked bags to ticket changes.

Both airlines say they are reacting to higher fuel costs. But while the fees may be going up, the fares are going down, at least temporarily.

Popular destination will see the lowest fares

Fares will be lowest on flights to places where the airlines fly to the most. Because there are so many existing flights to destinations like Los Angeles, Las Vegas, and Denver, the airlines will have to cut fares to fill those seats.

With the average domestic round trip airfare between $200 to $300 over the summer, CheapOair is predicting savvy travelers will find those fares to the aforementioned destinations “drastically” lower if they book before mid September.

There are more money-saving tips on ConsumerAffairs' travel guide.

Summer airfares are some of the highest of the year, but travelers can find some great deals as fares start to fall over the next few weeks..After revi...

Article Image

Southwest and JetBlue Airlines both up passenger fees

Both Southwest and JetBlue are following United’s announcement on fee bumps with ones of their own.

First, Southwest said sayonara to its much-loved peanuts. Now, the airline will be moving from its flat $15 for Early Bird Check-In to $15, $20, or $25 per one-way route starting on August 29, 2018. What the flier pays is based on the length of the flight and what Southwest considers the popularity of that flight’s Early Bird Check-In.

According to its website, Southwest warns that while its Early Bird option "doesn't guarantee an A boarding position, it improves your seat selection options to help you get your favorite seat."

Travel+Leisure reported that Southwest raked in more than $350 million in 2017 off of Early Bird Check-In fees alone. By bumping the flat $15 fee to as much as $25, the airline has the potential to make another $100 million or two.

JetBlue’s fees rise across-the-board

JetBlue fliers might also be raising some eyebrows due to changing baggage, pet, change, and cancel fees, which are all likely to change sometime before September, 2018. These fees don’t stem from greed, however. JetBlue is trying to cut costs by $300 million a year and has braced its employees for layoffs and buyouts.

"If you have upcoming travel with JetBlue that you might need to change or cancel, it could be a good idea to do so before the end of the month when these new fees are likely to take effect," advises ThePointsGuy.

While fee changes haven’t been updated at JetBlue’s website, the Points Guy reports the increases should roll out over the next several weeks.

Playing the airline game can’t be much fun

Despite passenger air travel projected to continue its upswing through 2030, airlines are taking hits from rising fuel prices and the major carriers are taking a beating from low-cost carriers and regional airlines that have set the industry on its ear with inventive low-fare business prototypes.

"Notwithstanding the fact that airlines such as Easyjet and Ryanair have steadily eaten into the market share of major transportation companies," wrote Statista in its analysis of global air traffic passenger demand.

"Aviation demand is set to be fueled by the rising affluence of the middle classes in emerging markets. Consequently, the air traffic industry is forecast to grow most significantly in Latin America and Africa."

While not a fee increase, American Airlines announced on Tuesday that it’s cutting back on some of its money-losing flights to China. However, the company will also be adding flights to its more profitable European routes.

Both Southwest and JetBlue are following United’s announcement on fee bumps with ones of their own.First, Southwest said sayonara to its much-loved pea...

Article Image

United Airlines to start charging for seats near the front of its planes

Following the lead of American and Delta, United Airlines is placing a premium price on select reserve seats near the front of its airplanes.

However, unlike its competitors, passengers won’t get anything special like roomier legroom that comes with United’s "Economy Plus" option -- they’re just seats near the front that give fliers the advantage of not having to walk so far to their seat and departing sooner when the flight lands.

On a typical flight on one of United’s 737 planes, those seats would start behind the eight rows of Economy Plus seats. According to reports, elite-level frequent fliers and some of United’s corporate clients can reserve these seats for free as part of a new corporate perks program that the company announced last week.

Do I have a choice?

On its face, the move simply looks like another way for United to beef up its bottom line.

In its second-quarter 2018 financial results, United reported that its consolidated total revenue per available seat mile (TRASM) increased 2.8 percent year-over-year. In the dog-eat-dog airline business, every positive percentage point can go a long way, especially when you consider that the profit margin for the major carriers is only around 9 percent.

Paying for seats is always the customer’s choice. For example, Delta’s reservation FAQs state that "You will get a seat assignment for free after you check in for a flight via delta.com, a Delta airport kiosk or with a Gate Agent within 24 hours of departure."

Of course, certain seats are made available to travelers who require extra room, a child traveling alone, or a flier who has a disability.

"We're happy to assist our customers with disabilities in securing a comfortable seat that best fits their needs in the same class of service. We highly encourage customers to submit their request more than 24 hours in advance of the scheduled flight," United said.

Following the lead of American and Delta, United Airlines is placing a premium price on select reserve seats near the front of its airplanes.However, u...

Article Image

Do you really understand your frequent-flier program?

Travel rewards credit cards have become highly popular in recent years, but a new study suggests consumers have little understanding of airline loyalty programs, run by the airlines themselves, and are missing out on important benefits.

The just-released J.D. Power 2018 Airline Loyalty Program Satisfaction Study found that about half of the consumers enrolled in airline loyalty programs don't fully understand how to earn or redeem their points or miles.

Even 30 percent of status-level members said they often feel clueless when it comes to their frequent flier programs.

At the same time, the study found that consumers with a good grasp of how these programs work are among the most satisfied airline customers. Michael Taylor, Travel Practice Lead at J.D. Power, says part of the problem may lie with the airlines themselves.

“Airlines have a huge opportunity to improve when it comes to customers’ ease of understanding the rewards program," Taylor said. "JetBlue does very well in this area, though across the industry it’s only happening about half the time.”

Confusing program details

Part of the problem appears to be confusing program details, and J.D. Power suggests that's on the airlines. The study found half of general loyalty program members say they do not completely understand how their program works, suggesting communications issues.

When members say they do understand how to redeem their points, their satisfaction with the airline's loyalty program jumps by 123 points. When they understand fully how they can earn points, their satisfaction climbs by 131 points.

A lack of full understanding may be responsible for this next statistic: the study found 74 percent of airline loyalty programs rarely use their points, allowing them to accumulate. Only 13 percent prefer to redeem their points for quick discounts.

Hard to use?

Another reason that miles tend to pile up is the belief among some consumers that they're getting harder to use. Last year Kerry Welsh, a retired entrepreneur from Rancho Palos Verdes, told the Los Angeles Times he is frustrated when he tries to use his miles because there is always an extra charge and it's hard to find an available seat.

"Many frequent fliers are like me," he told the Times. "We have millions of miles, but we don't use them, because using the miles is a big rip-off. So instead we accumulate more miles."

The other airlines might want to observe how JetBlue and Southwest explain their loyalty programs to members. Those two airlines rank one and two respectively in overall satisfaction. Alaska Airlines was a close third.

The study measured member satisfaction with airline rewards and loyalty programs based on four factors: earning and redeeming rewards; program benefits; account management; and member communication.

Travel rewards credit cards have become highly popular in recent years, but a new study suggests consumers have little understanding of airline loyalty pro...

Article Image

Southwest places new limits on animals traveling with passengers

Southwest Airlines is the latest airline to limit the types of animals that passengers can bring aboard aircraft.

The airline has issued a set of updated policies for transporting trained service and emotional support animals in the aircraft cabin. The changes go into effect Monday, September 17.

It follows other airlines making similar adjustments to their policies after some consumers complained that existing policies were being abused.

"We welcome emotional support and trained service animals that provide needed assistance to our customers," said Steve Goldberg, Senior Vice President of Operations and Hospitality. "However, we want to make sure our guidelines are clear and easy to understand while providing customers and employees a comfortable and safe experience."

Southwest said it reviewed the recent enforcement guidance issued by the Department of Transportation (DOT), and also looked at the feedback it received from customers and employees. It also consulted several advocacy groups representing customers with disabilities who travel with service animals.

Changes in policy

After reviewing that guidance, Southwest said it will make the following changes on September 17:

  • Emotional support animals (ESA) will be limited to dogs and cats

  • ESAs will be limited to one per passenger

  • ESAs must be in a carrier or on a leash at all times

Passengers with ESAs will still be required to present a complete, current letter from a medical doctor or licensed mental health professional on the day of departure.

When it comes to trained service animals, Southwest will only allow the most common service animals -- dogs, cats, and miniature horses -- to board. Unusual or exotic animals will be rejected on health and safety grounds.

If a passenger is traveling with an animal, he or she must be able to provide "credible verbal assurance" that the animal is a trained service animal.

Ongoing review

"The ultimate goal with these changes is to ensure customers traveling with service animals know what to expect when choosing Southwest," said Goldberg. "Southwest will continue working with advocacy groups, employees, customers, and the DOT to ensure we offer supportive service animal guidelines."

Part of the policy change includes the formal recognition that fully-trained psychiatric support animals (PSAs) qualify as trained service animals. In the past, the airline conveyed informal recognition.

However, Southwest says all emotional support and service animals must be trained to behave in a public setting and must be under the control of the handler at all times. The airline said it reserves the right to deny boarding to any animal that is not behaving in accordance with guidelines.

Southwest Airlines is the latest airline to limit the types of animals that passengers can bring aboard aircraft.The airline has issued a set of update...

Article Image

Ryanair cancels 400 flights as pilots strike

In the midst of a pilot strike, Ryanair was forced to cancel nearly 400 flights in some of its biggest markets. The strike is the largest the airline has seen its 34-year history, affecting over 70,000 passengers who had their flights canceled today.

“The airline says that 250 flights to and from Germany have been cancelled, along with 104 flights serving Belgium, 22 services to and from Sweden, and 20 between Ireland and Britain,” according to The Independent.

German pilots and crew members are striking for better pay and working conditions. “Ryanair alone is responsible for the escalation that has now occurred. VC regrets the impact on affected passengers, cabin crew, and ground crew,” union representatives of Vereinigung Cockpit (VC) said. However, the company responded to that assertion in a tweet.

“Despite the regrettable and unjustified strike action taking place in five of our 37 markets, over 2,000 Ryanair flights will operate as normal, carrying almost 400,000 passengers across Europe. We ask the striking unions to continue negotiations instead of calling any more unjustified strikes,” the company said.

“Ryanair has a long way to go before it can be considered a fair employer,” the International Transport Workers’ Federation, coordinators of the strikes across Europe, shot back. “Calls for industrial action will continue until the company makes good collective bargaining agreements with unions.”  

Recent issues

In late 2017, a pilot shortage and the imminence of a holiday strike forced Ryanair to reverse a decades-long policy and finally recognize unions for the first time.

Despite now recognizing the labor unions, Ryanair still has not signed any labor contracts and “has responded to worker demands with its characteristically pugnacious approach,” according to CNN.

Because of continued pilot strikes in Dublin, Ryanair announced last month that its Dublin fleet would be smaller by 20 percent come the winter. The company also warned 300 of its employees -- 100 pilots and 200 crew members -- that their jobs aren’t safe, while also posting pilots’ earnings on the company website to show just how much Ryanair pays them.

According to Kenny Jacobs, the chief marketing officer at Ryanair, the company is “not prepared to concede to unreasonable demands that will compromise either our low fares or our highly efficient model.”

CNN sees the issues between Ryanair and the unions could be enough to remove CEO Michael O’Leary from his position at the company. O’Leary has been at the helm of Ryanair since 1994 and is under contract until late next year.

In the midst of a pilot strike, Ryanair was forced to cancel nearly 400 flights in some of its biggest markets. The strike is the largest the airline has s...

Article Image

Congress considering new requirements for airlines

A five-year reauthorization bill for the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) is currently making its way through Congress, and as boring as that sounds it holds major implications for air travelers.

In recent years the FAA has deflected consumer requests for airline reforms by saying it's up to Congress to make those decisions. So the legislation passed by the House, and now pending in the Senate, addresses some of those issues.

The House-passed measure instructs the FAA to set rules for airlines when configuring cabins. It requires a minimum for the width of a seat and the length and distance between rows.

This has long been a major source of air traveler complaints who find it difficult to squeeze into ever-shrinking seats with little to no leg room.

The consumer group FlyersRights.org says the FAA has consistently refused to set minimum seat standards because the airlines don't want them, even though there are safety issues involved.

'Shrinking seats'

“It has been going on for the last 10 to 15 years, seats have been getting smaller as people get larger," Paul Hudson, FlyersRights.org’s president, told The Telegraph of London. "Our view is they have been shrinking seats to get more passengers on a plane to get more revenue. They are also trying to make it so uncomfortable that people will upgrade and pay far higher fares.”

While the House bill requires the FAA to set minimum standards for seat sizes, the measure doesn't specify what those standards should be. The Senate version of the legislation does even less -- only requiring the FAA to conduct a study to determine whether there should be minimum distance between rows.

Travelers who suspect that space has been shrinking are probably correct. According to USA Today, the pitch -- or distance from a point on one seat to the same point on the seat in front -- has declined over the years in Delta, American, and United economy class seats.

In 1985, the distance was between 32 and 36 inches. In 2014, it was between 30 and 31 inches.

Consumers will get their say, but so will the airlines

Assuming the final legislation requires the FAA to set minimum seat standards, the agency will likely take public comments into consideration. Those comments will not only include opinions from the flying public, but also the airlines themselves.

The airlines have already had some influence on the House version of the reauthorization bill, which removes a 2012 rule that airlines must include all taxes and fees when they advertise a fare. Airlines have never liked that rule, and according to the Chicago Tribune, focused their lobbyists on overturning it.

Meanwhile, the Senate version of the bill would prevent airlines from tacking on "unreasonable" fees for cancelling or making changes to tickets. Other fees charged by the airlines would have to reflect the airlines' actual costs.

A five-year reauthorization bill for the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) is currently making its way through Congress, and as boring as that sounds i...

Article Image

American Airlines to allow one free carry-on bag on flights

Starting September 5, 2018, American Airlines will permit its lowest fare class passengers to bring aboard a free carry-on bag in addition to the currently allowable personal item.

Passengers booked in American's basic economy will still have to pay a standard fee ($25 domestic and $60 trans-Atlantic) to check a bag and will board in the last group, but saving anything in today’s travel environment is a welcome change, especially when airlines threaten to raise fares to offset rising fuel costs.

With this move, American joins Delta in allowing a carry-on bag as part of its Basic Economy fare. Yet, American has a lot of catching up to do to gain parity with Delta. In a recent J.D. Power customer satisfaction survey, Delta had four stars and 767 points to American’s three stars and 729 points.

Why the change?

Airlines are smart enough to realize that, in today’s dog-eat-dog economy, consumers pore over every charge, and if they feel like they’re saving money on one thing -- like a carry-on -- they may spend it on another.

“Basic Economy is working well in the markets where we offer it, and we continue to see more than 60 percent of customers buy up to Main Cabin when offered a choice,” said President Robert Isom on the company’s recent earnings call. “Removing the bag restriction will make Basic Economy more competitive, allowing us to offer this low-fare product to more customers.”

When Forbes asked about Delta’s Basic Economy service, the airline’s president Glen Hauenstein said, “The success of that product in our minds is not how many people buy it, but how many people don’t buy it and choose another product.”

So, who’s left holding the bag? With American and Delta offering a free carry-on in basic economy, the only major U.S. airline left not offering the perk is United.

Second-tier carriers like Spirit, Allegiant, and Frontier may be slow to follow the major airlines’ lead, though. Incidental costs for things like carry-ons help to flesh out the low-fare airlines’ revenue stream.

Starting September 5, 2018, American Airlines will permit its lowest fare class passengers to bring aboard a free carry-on bag in addition to the currently...

Article Image

Southwest’s fatal accident cost it $100 million

Southwest airlines is still feeling the financial impact of a deadly accident that happened back in April.

The Dallas-based carrier reported a strong second-quarter profit, but it revealed that the accident that claimed the life of passenger Jennifer Riordan cost the airline $100 million worth of business.

Debris from a failed engine on Flight 1380 from New York to Dallas partially blew out a window on the plane, pulling Riordan -- a mother of two -- through the opening. Several passengers pulled her back in, but she died from her injuries at the hospital later.

"I am especially proud of the heroic efforts of our people to address and overcome the challenges resulting from the accident," Southwest CEO Gary Kelly said in a statement.

The airline pulled advertising in the wake of the April 17 accident and said at the time that it was bracing for a financial impact on bookings as a result of the incident.

Kelly said he expects the financial repercussions of the fatal accident to ease up in the third quarter. Revenue for each seat flown is poised to increase as much as 1 percent in the next three months. It had tumbled by 3 percent following the incident.

"We are encouraged by the solid rebound in demand," Kelly said in the statement.

Southwest shares have fallen 20 percent this year.

Southwest airlines is still feeling the financial impact of a deadly accident that happened back in April.The Dallas-based carrier reported a strong se...

Article Image

New airport scanners could put an end to liquid restrictions

A small number of security lanes at London's Heathrow Airport are currently using new scanners which could one day lead to the removal of liquid restrictions, as well as keep passengers from having to remove items from their baggage before passing through security.

The computed tomography (CT) scanners allow airport security staff to see a detailed, three-dimensional, X-ray image of objects inside people’s luggage from every angle. The new technology is being tested over the next six to 12 months.

“We continue to look at new technologies that can both improve the passenger experience and strengthen our security,” a spokesperson for Heathrow said in a statement.

The UK’s Department for Transport (DFT) said the technology can also detect hidden explosives.

“If successful, this could lead in future to passengers no longer needing to remove items from hand luggage for screening,” the agency said in a statement.

Could end the liquid ban

During the trial period, some passengers at Heathrow will not have to remove their laptops or liquids from their luggage. However, the DFT stressed that the "rules remain the same -- passengers should expect to remove items if requested during the screening purposes."

If successful, the trial could possibly lead to the end of restrictions on how much liquid passengers can bring on board. Passengers were banned from traveling with liquids in their carry-on baggage in August 2006 following the discovery of a ‘liquid bomb’ plot, in which terrorists traveling from the UK allegedly tried to blow up 10 airliners using explosive material hidden in soft drink bottles.

Currently, passengers are allowed to take liquids in containers under 100 milliliters carried in a separate, transparent, resealable bag. The restrictions on liquid could be softened even further if the trials are determined to be a success and the technology is rolled out to more airports.

“It is the beginning of the end of the liquid ban, and it’s long overdue,” said Philip Baum of Aviation Security International magazine.

Similar scanners have also been tested at JFK Airport in New York and at Schiphol Airport in Amsterdam.

A small number of security lanes at London's Heathrow Airport are currently using new scanners which could one day lead to the removal of liquid restrictio...

Article Image

United flight attendants to start hawking the airline's credit card

On the ground, most of us are subjected to relentless sales pitches every day, from robocalls to pop-up ads on the internet.

But if you think taking an airline flight will give you a couple of hours of peace from the endless selling, you could be wrong. At least two major airlines are enlisting flight attendants to pitch the airline's credit card to a captive audience, buckled in at 30,000 feet.

United is the latest airline to turn its flight attendants into sales personnel. Beginning September 1, it will require flight attendants to offer a sales message to domestic and international passengers on the benefits of carrying the airline's credit card.

“We are introducing a new training program for our co-branded credit card that is especially designed for flight attendants, as this work group has the most engagement with our customers,” the airline said in a statement to the Los Angeles Times. “Our inflight crew are effective ambassadors, who can best communicate to our customers in the moment the benefits of the United Explorer card."

Lucrative for the airlines

United joins American as carriers that will use the cabin crew to pitch credit cards to passengers, offering financial incentives for each sale. For the airline, co-branded credit cards can be lucrative.

The banks that manage airline travel cards usually buy miles from the airline that are, in turn, used to reward cardholders who spend a certain amount using the card.

While travel rewards cards are not a good fit for most consumers, those who travel a lot may find them highly beneficial. An airline cardholder may get special perks, such as preferred seating, early check-in, and free checked bags, which could easily pay for the annual fee over a year of heavy travel.

VIP lounge access

Carrying an airline co-branded credit card may also give travelers access to the airline's VIP lounge, with more relaxing surroundings than an airline terminal gate and an offering of complementary food and beverages.

Not all are the same, however. Forbes and The Points Guy recently rated the top four airline credit cards for their access to airport amenities.

They include The Platinum Card from American Express; Citi /AAdvantage Executive World Elite Mastercard; Delta Reserve Credit Card from American Express; United MileagePlus Club Card.

All four cards carry hefty annual fees of between $450 and $550, so the cards would probably only pay off for high-frequency air travelers.

On the ground, most of us are subjected to relentless sales pitches every day, from robocalls to pop-up ads on the internet.But if you think taking an...

Article Image

Delta cutting back on flights as fuel bills skyrocket

Delta Air Lines has decided to pull back on its flight schedule starting this fall thanks to rising fuel costs.

In the wake of a $2 billion bump in its 2018 fuel bill and a $183 million dip from the June 2017 quarter, the company is hoping its short-term cuts will have a healthier impact long-term.

“We have seen early success in addressing the fuel cost increase and offset two-thirds of the impact in the June quarter,” said Ed Bastian, Delta’s Chief Executive Officer.  “With strong revenue momentum, an improving cost trajectory, and a reduction of 50-100 bps (base points) of underperforming capacity from our fall schedule, we have positioned Delta to return to margin expansion by year end.”

“Accelerating the recapture of the recent fuel price increases is the number one focus for our commercial team,” added Delta President Glen Hauenstein.

Mother Nature also played a hand in Delta’s revenue plunge when the January 2018 Nor’easter forced the airline to cancel more than 400 of its flights.

How does an airline turn something like this around?

No one’s saying whether Delta will try and recoup some of its losses by raising airfare, but fliers shouldn’t be surprised if it does.

Airlines have other course correction options, too. For example, an airline could establish routes to places where higher fares are a given and cut back on the smaller income-producing routes.

That may be Delta’s play here if its plans for global expansion are kept intact. The company began its global inroads in May when it launched a joint venture with Korean Air and instantly found its way into more than 50 Korean Air-operated markets.

The company also has plans in place for new service from Los Angeles to Paris and Amsterdam, Indianapolis to Paris, and Atlanta to Lisbon. Nonstop service between the United States and Mumbai, India; Osaka, Japan; and Seoul, South Korea are also penciled in for 2019.

The global market is a smart play as the middle class continues to grow in emerging economies like India and China, giving rise to an upswing in the number of fliers.

“It is believed that the global aviation industry will reach up to 33.8 billion US dollars in profits in 2018, up from only 8.3 billion US dollars in 2011,” wrote Statista.com in its review of airline profits. “Between 2017 and 2036, the number of airline passengers is expected to grow at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 4.7 percent.”

Delta Air Lines has decided to pull back on its flight schedule starting this fall thanks to rising fuel costs.In the wake of a $2 billion bump in its...

Article Image

Southwest Airlines will stop serving free peanuts Aug. 1

Once upon a time, airline passengers almost always got a free meal with their flight. Then came cost-cutting, and food options were literally reduced to peanuts.

But starting August 1, you won't get peanuts on Southwest Airlines flights. The carrier announced on Twitter that it will stop handing out packets of peanuts, out of consideration for passengers who might have severe peanut allergies.

While other airlines added peanuts to their snack packs when they phased out meals, peanuts have a long history with Southwest. In its earlier days as an airline that only flew between Texas cities, Southwest had associated itself with peanuts, advertising its low “peanuts fares.”

Pretzels still available

Southwest says its passengers won't go hungry while in the air. The airline will continue to hand out free packages of pretzels. On longer flights, the carrier says passengers will have a few more snack options, including cookies.

Southwest is not the first airline to discontinue peanuts. Some other carriers took that step to avoid a situation in which a passenger suffers a life-threatening allergic reaction at 30-thousand feet. Potential allergens remain a hot-button topic for many.

Last year, the nonprofit advocacy group Food Allergy Research and Education filed a lawsuit against American Airlines to obtain pre-boarding privileges for fliers with food allergies. The suit said it is important that these travelers board early to ensure that their seating area is clean and free of allergens.

At the time, Dr. James Baker, CEO and chief medical officer of the group, stressed that the suit did not seek to stop American from serving peanuts; it simply wanted to remove the pre-boarding restriction for people with food allergies.

Other airlines' policies

According to TravelSort.com, some airlines are better about dealing with food allergies than others. It says Delta will not serve any peanut products on your flight if you notify the airline beforehand of your food allergy.

Air Canada and JetBlue do not serve peanuts but, as of 2017, JetBlue did serve snacks containing tree nuts. JetBlue says it does not include any kinds of nuts in its free snacks.

It says if passengers with allergies notify the airline in advance, they will be seated two rows away from any passenger who is consuming nuts.

Once upon a time, airline passengers almost always got a free meal with their flight. Then came cost-cutting, and food options were literally reduced to pe...

Article Image

FAA declines to regulate airline seating

Despite safety concerns and numerous gripes made by travelers, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) says it has found no need to regulate airline seat size and legroom.

In a letter announcing its decision, the agency said it “has no evidence that there is an immediate safety issue necessitating rule-making at this time.”

The letter was in response to a lawsuit filed by Flyers Rights, a consumer advocacy group which had requested that the FAA establish guidelines for seat dimensions. Flyers Rights argued that shrinking seats and narrow rows reduce the possibility of a safe emergency evacuation, especially for larger passengers.

However, the FAA countered by saying that current seat size is not a safety issue.

"The time it takes passengers to get out of their seats, even if those seats are relatively narrow and close together, is less than the time it takes for the emergency exits to begin functioning and for the line that begins forming in the aisle to clear," Dorenda Baker, executive director of the FAA's Aircraft Certification Service, said in the letter.

Shrinking seats

Flyers Rights said that airline seats have moved three inches closer together since 1978 as airlines pack more passengers onto each flight. Average seat width on many major airlines has shrunk by 1 1/2 inches, to around 17 inches, The New York Times reports.

The rate of obesity in the U.S. has also soared in recent decades, further compounding the issue of cramped conditions on airplanes. Today, 70 percent of adults are overweight compared to about 45 percent in 1960, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).

Regardless, the FAA cited test videos showing that seat size is not to blame for slow evacuation times. "The FAA has no evidence that a typical passenger, even a larger one, will take more than a couple of seconds to get out of his or her seat," Baker said.

The sequence of evacuation events and how closely passengers follow the safety instructions are most critical in ensuring a speedy evacuation, the FAA said.

“Passengers, regardless of their size, all use those first few seconds to get out of their seats, then either enter the aisle or wait to enter the aisle,” said Jeffrey Gardlin, the senior technical specialist for aircraft cabin security and survivability at FAA.

Research questioned

Flyers Rights has questioned the FAA’s safety evidence.

"These censored Airbus and Boeing video clips only show younger physically fit test subjects in exercise clothing stepping into the aisles. There is no showing subjects actually exiting any aircraft,” said Paul Hudson, the group’s president.

“There are no overweight, obese, elderly, infirm or children test subjects (or adjustments made for their absence), thereby excluding about 80% of US passengers. The tests are supposed to simulate panic as this is a major factor in efficient evacuation, but the videos show test subjects smiling and some laughing,” Hudson said.

“The tests are supposed to require that 50% of carry-on baggage be in the aisles but the videos show this did not happen. There is apparently no supervision or direct observation by the FAA or outside safety experts."

Flyers Rights says it will continue to fight the FAA’s stance.

"Lives are at stake here," Flyers Rights staff attorney Andrew Applebaum told NBC News. "We need to make sure that the FAA and the manufacturers are actually testing full scale demonstrations."

Despite safety concerns and numerous gripes made by travelers, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) says it has found no need to regulate airline...

Article Image

Smoke forces evacuation of United jet in Washington, DC

A United Airlines jet was potentially minutes from disaster Sunday when the cabin filled with smoke, prompting an emergency evacuation.

The Washington Airports Authority said the Houston-bound regional jet, an ERJ-170, was on the runway and preparing to take off when smoke began to fill the cabin. The crew stopped the aircraft and ordered an evacuation, using the plane's emergency slides.

Philip Rucker, White House Bureau Chief at the Washington Post, posted video on Twitter of the plane stopped on the tarmac and passengers leaving the aircraft. At the time, Rucker believed that the plane had just landed.

In a statement to the media, United said the cause of the smoke was not immediately known. It occurred aboard a Mesa Airlines flight, operating under the United Express brand. The airline said all passengers evacuated safely and an investigation is underway to determine what happened.

Fire in the sky usually deadly

Fire aboard an aircraft mid-flight is particularly dangerous. According to Skybrary, an aviation safety website, an airborne fire is one of the most hazardous situations a flight crew can face.

The site presents data showing that from the first indication that there is a fire on board, the crew has no more than 17 minutes to safely land the aircraft. It says that once a fire has become established, the crew will probably not be able to extinguish it.

In 1983, 23 passengers were killed aboard an Air Canada DC-9 jet when a fire broke out on a Dallas to Toronto flight. Despite losing control of key electronics, the crew was able to make an emergency landing at Cincinnati and evacuate most of the passengers.

The incident led to new international flight safety regulations, which included the installation of smoke detectors aboard all commercial aircraft.

A United Airlines jet was potentially minutes from disaster Sunday when the cabin filled with smoke, prompting an emergency evacuation.The Washington A...

Article Image

Delta Air Lines updates its policy regarding service and support animals

Beginning July 10, Delta’s new policy regarding support animals will limit each customer to one animal. At the same time, Delta also instituted a ban against pit bull type dogs as service or support animals.

This move punctuates Delta’s recent policy change that requires passengers flying with service animals to sign a statement that their animal is healthy and well-behaved before they can board a flight.

"The safety and security of Delta people and our customers is always our top priority," said Gil West, Chief Operating Officer, in the company’s statement on the policy change. "We will always review and enhance our policies and procedures to ensure that Delta remains a leader in safety."

"Ignoring the true intent of existing rules governing the transport of service and support animals can be a disservice to customers who have real and documented needs," the company added.

Recent incidents in which several employees were bitten and an increasing number of fliers who insist their pets are service or emotional support animals has become a sore point for airlines. Not only has Delta’s policy changed, but similar changes have been implemented by American Airlines and United Airlines.

What qualifies as a service animal?

Delta says it’s had its hands full with what passengers claim to be "comfort" animals. It claims to have seen passengers attempting to fly with turkeys, gliding possums, snakes, and even spiders.

The Department of Transportation defines a "service animal" under the Air Carrier Access Act (ACAA) as "any animal that is individually trained or able to provide assistance to a person with a disability; or any animal that assists persons with disabilities by providing emotional support." The agency created the below video to explain further and provide more information.

Legally, airlines have the right to ask for documentation to prove that an animal is an emotional support animal. The specifics of that documentation might vary from airline to airline, but according to US Service Animals, passengers should expect to provide proof from a licensed doctor or mental health professional stating that the animal is an essential part of treatment for a disability.

Beginning July 10, Delta’s new policy regarding support animals will limit each customer to one animal. At the same time, Delta also instituted a ban again...

Article Image

How much should you get for giving up your airline seat?

The summer travel season often means jammed airport terminals and oversold flights. When that happens, you might be asked to give up your seat and take a later flight.

Should you, and how much compensation from the airline should you expect?

Last year, United Airlines was the unwelcome focus of attention after a passenger, Dr. David Dao, was dragged off a flight after declining to give up his seat so that an airline employee could take his place.

United, along with other airlines, immediately implemented changes in how they handle overbooked situations, in some cases increasing the incentives for booked passengers to voluntarily take a later flight.

The GO Group surveyed a representative sample of air travelers to learn what consumers think they should get for accepting a bump. The opinions are widely divergent.

Willingness to take the money

"Perhaps the most surprising result of the survey was that only 22.6 percent of business travelers and 15.5 percent of leisure travelers were unwilling to give up their seats no matter how substantial the compensation,” said John McCarthy, president of The GO Group. “Given the complications of air travel today, we really expected more people to say 'thanks, but no thanks' if asked to give up their seats."

Missing a scheduled flight could mean that the traveler has to scramble to rearrange connecting flights. On the other hand, airlines may be willing to pay travelers more for their trouble.

In terms of compensation, 42.5 percent of leisure travelers would settle for $750 to give up their seat. However, only 27 percent of business travelers thought that amount was adequate.

Business travelers generally said they would hold out for more, with nearly 15 percent saying $2,000 would be fair compensation. Only 7 percent of leisure travelers said they would ask for that much.

All consumers generally agreed that the level of compensation should be based on the inconvenience caused by taking another flight.

Passengers’ rights

Since the chances are increasing that you'll be asked to surrender your seat on a flight, it pays to know what the airline can legally do, and your rights as a passenger.

For example, airlines are required to seek volunteers who are willing to be bumped before involuntarily bumping someone from a flight. Involuntarily-bumped passengers must also receive written notice of their rights.

In 2017, the Department of Transportation fined Frontier Airlines for violating both of those rules.

Airlines generally look for volunteers to give up oversold seats before they board the aircraft. The Department of Transportation suggests asking a couple of questions before deciding whether to accept the airline's offer.

  • When is the next flight on which the airline can confirm your seat? The alternate flight may be just as acceptable to you. On the other hand, if the airline offers to put you on standby on another flight that's full, you could be stranded.

  • Will the airline provide other amenities such as free meals, a hotel room, transfers between the hotel and the airport, and a phone card? If not, you might have to spend the money it offers you on food or lodging while you wait for the next flight.

Remember that the government has not mandated the form or amount of compensation that airlines offer to volunteers, so it is up to passengers to try to negotiate the best deal possible with the airline.

The summer travel season often means jammed airport terminals and oversold flights. When that happens, you might be asked to give up your seat and take a l...

Article Image

Airline fares rise as fuel charges surge

As a result of the highest fuel costs in the last decade, the country’s top airlines are preparing to raise prices on domestic flights, marking the fourth increase in ticket prices this year.

Major U.S. airlines are planning a $20 surcharge to each roundtrip ticket. The extra charge will be classified as a “fuel surcharge,” meaning consumers won’t see it on the initial posted ticket price whether they check online, over the phone, or through a travel agent.

“Consumers will pay more because of higher fuel costs,” said Henry Harteveldt, a travel analyst and founder of Atmosphere Research Group. “I think it will affect summer travel for people who have not booked their flights.”

According to a report by the Bureau of Transportation Statistics, airline carriers used 1,434 billion gallons of gas in April this year. Though this was a 2.1 percent drop from March, gas prices climbed 4.5 percent to $2.08. Airlines spent nearly $3 billion on fuel this year, a number that rose 2.5 percent.

What it means for airlines

Overall earnings for the country’s publicly traded airlines continue to fall, as they’ve dropped 24 percent since the start of 2018. A spokesperson for the lobbying group Airlines for America noted that revenue for airlines has risen seven percent this year, while fuel prices have also gone up by nearly 10 percent.

Delta shared publicly this week that second-quarter earnings will be no higher than $1.75 per share, lower than the originally projected $2 per share. The move came just weeks after American Airlines, the country’s number one airline, lowered its projected forecast for the remainder of the second quarter.

This quarter alone, fuel prices rose 12 percent, and Delta noted it could take up to six months for fares to catch up.

Adam Hackel, an analyst at Imperial Capital, believes other airlines are likely to follow in Delta’s footsteps. “You’ll certainly see over the next week or two some more revisions as they get fuel fully priced in,” he noted.

Despite concerns, some airlines seem optimistic. While United Airlines boosted the lower end of its full-year earning target by $7, Allegiant Air said more efficient jets are helping them combat rising fuel prices. CEO Maurice Gallagher told shareholders that the airline is getting 44 percent more flight capacity from each gallon of gas.

“Given the benefit of better fuel metrics and operational reliability, we will be able (and have been so far) to increase our daily utilization, making our fleet more productive,” Gallagher said.

Southwest Airlines, which anticipated a drop in ticket sales following a fatal accident earlier this year, also reported revenue passenger miles (the industry’s gauge of demand) increased 4.2 percent this May to 11.7 billion. However, the company is still expecting a nearly three percent drop in operating revenue after that fatal accident.

What consumers should expect

In addition to higher fares, consumers should also expect fewer seats available per flight. While Delta is still in the early stages of deciding how many seats -- if any -- they’ll cut moving forward, the decision wouldn’t go into effect until after Labor Day. By reducing the number of seats on each flight, airlines are able to raise fares, should the demand remain.

Airlines won’t cut down on seats during the busy summer months, so consumers can expect things to be different by summer’s end.

“There’s still enough time for them to look at it after Labor Day, when you really hit a pretty dramatic off-peak period for this industry,” Hackel said. “The industry is still benefiting from strong travel demand.”

As a result of the highest fuel costs in the last decade, the country’s top airlines are preparing to raise prices on domestic flights, marking the fourth...

Article Image

U.S. airlines miss the cut for the top 20 best rated international carriers

For international travelers, picking the right airlines and passing through the most safe and efficient airports can help determine whether the trip is a success.

To guide travelers in the right direction, AirHelp, a flight compensatory company, has compiled a ranking of the best airlines and airports around the world, noting that both categories are getting better, mainly due to rising competition for the international travel dollar.

For 2018, Qatar Airways earns the top spot, followed by Lufthansa and Etihad Airways. Airlines are rated on quality of service, on-time performance, claim processing, and how consumers rate them in online forums.

Qatar Airways was credited with big improvements in on-time performance and claims the top spot processing, helping it to overtake Singapore Airlines, which dropped to fourth place among 72 airlines for 2018. Worldwide, Lufthansa, Etihad Airways, and South African Airways rounded out the top five.

U.S. airlines not highly ranked

No U.S.-based airline made the top 10. In fact, the highest ranking domestic carrier is American Airlines, which only earned 23rd place in the international rankings. United is the next highest, coming in at only 37th on the list.

AirHelp CEO and co-founder Henrik Zillmer says the rankings show that airlines putting passengers first do best in the annual ranking.

"For too long airlines have focused on cutting corners and costs without regard to the people they serve,” he said. “We're thrilled to see a positive shift in many airlines who are now putting passengers first, and when things do go wrong these airlines are holding themselves accountable by executing the rightfully owed claims quickly and without hassle."

Follow the leader

Zillmer said airlines can improve their rankings by following the example of those at the top of the list, such as Qatar Airways, which he said has held down one of the top three spots since 2015.

Airports appear to be another matter entirely. While Hamad International Airport, Athens International Airport, and Tokyo Haneda International Airport hold down the top three spots, Zillmer says most airports around have some catching up to do.

"It is clear there is a need for significant improvement, with overbooked flights and cancellations making national headlines month after month, and the consistent mistreatment of consumers," said Zillmer. "It is no wonder most airlines and airports received poor ratings on the AirHelp Score. It is more important than ever for consumers to fight for their air passenger rights."

To see how ConsumerAffairs readers rate airlines, click here.

For international travelers, picking the right airlines and passing through the most safe and efficient airports can help determine whether the trip is a s...

Article Image

Consumers voice record satisfaction with airlines

For consumers, air travel appears to be getting more tolerable. The 2018 J.D. Power North America Airline Satisfaction Study finds continued improvement over 2017.

On a scale of 1 to 1,000, J.D. Power puts customer satisfaction with major airlines at 762, the highest level since the annual survey began. The report credits newer planes, cheaper fares, and more in-cabin storage space.

"With a single exception, airlines in North America show consistent improvements across all the factors, from booking a ticket to handling luggage,” said Michael Taylor, Travel Practice Lead at J.D. Power. “Operationally, it’s never been a better time to fly."

Taylor says passengers may be happier because they are perceiving greater value in ticket price. The check-in process has been streamlined and bags are getting lost less often. But he says there is definitely room for improvement.

Trying to keep up with technology

“The exception is in the in-flight services factor, which includes food, beverage and entertainment systems,” Taylor said. “Today’s passengers expect trouble-free connectivity for personal devices and airlines are challenged to keep pace with the technology that can achieve that goal."

In fact, this could be the key to improving a satisfaction rating. Taylor says passengers are far more likely to have a positive experience with an airline if they are entertained during their flight.

Alaska Airlines' winning streak

Alaska Airlines took the top spot among traditional airlines for the 11th consecutive year, earning a score of 775. The study found that Alaska Airlines scored particularly well in all seven factors of the study, with a great deal of improvement coming from investments in new overhead bins that fit roll-aboard bags better than traditional bins. Delta Air Lines was a close second with a score of 767.

Southwest Airlines ranked highest among low-cost carriers for the second straight year. It's score of 818 reflects a high level of satisfaction in all seven categories. JetBlue was second in the category with a score of 812.

If low fares contributed to airlines' increased standing in the eyes of the traveling public, the future may not bode well for continued happiness. Doug Parker, CEO at American Airlines, told CNBC today that rising fuel costs are cutting into all airline profits. If costs remain high, he says it's possible airlines will have to raise ticket prices to maintain profit margins.

For consumers, air travel appears to be getting more tolerable. The 2018 J.D. Power North America Airline Satisfaction Study finds continued improvement ov...

Article Image

Smart luggage company that insisted it would overcome airline ban is going out of business

Internet-connected “smart” suitcases have been the subject of media hype for several years thanks to press-savvy brands like BlueSmart Luggage, the company that claimed to be the original inventor of smart luggage.

BlueSmart got off the ground with $2.2 million raised through the crowdfunding site IndieGogo and the promise of a $400 suitcase that had more capabilities than a smartphone.

Less than a year ago, BlueSmart was featured in the New York Times, with chief executive Tomi Pierucci explaining that they preferred to be called a technology company, not a luggage company.

“We want to remind you to charge the suitcase the night before your trip,” he said of the company’s suitcases last July. “We want to offer you an Uber when your plane lands. We want to notify your hotel if your flight is delayed.”

The company reportedly sold at least 65,000 of its luxury bags.

But the smart luggage industry has been at a crossroads after the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) warned shortly before Christmas last year that the lithium-ion batteries that make the technology possible are a major fire hazard.  

Now, BlueSmart is going out of business, and people who purchased the expensive bags will not be receiving a refund. “The changes in policies announced by several major airlines at the end of last year—the banning of smart luggage with non-removable batteries—put our company in an irreversibly difficult financial and business situation,” BlueSmart explains.

Safety risk

BlueSmart recently wrote a letter to customers announcing the “bittersweet news.”

“This represents a very unfortunate outcome for everyone involved, and we are all very sorry for this unexpected turn of events,” the company says in the note on its website, adding that warranty support is no longer available for its products.

The luggage is only as smart as its connected app, of which the “service quality will be reduced in the future,” BlueSmart adds.

Last year, major airlines announced, per FAA regulations, that all “smart” luggage would be banned from getting anywhere near a plane unless the batteries could be removed from the bags. The regulations went into effect in January 2018.

FAA spokesman Gregory Martin told ConsumerAffairs at the time that the large lithium-ion batteries in smart bags posed an unacceptable safety risk because they were known to be flammable.

DOT denies company claims

However, BlueSmart continued insisting to consumers that the smart luggage ban would not apply to their own products. In a statement on their website, BlueSmart said late last year that “we have organized meetings with the world’s leading airlines to make sure that your Bluesmart will be approved.”

The company added in a statement to ConsumerAffairs last year that “DOT [the Department of Transportation] has already reviewed our products and all the technical documentation. The products passed all the necessary reviews and we are now waiting to get the formal letter of approval.”

But the FAA denied those claims and countered that there was no special review or exemption underway for BlueSmart.

While competitors like the company Raden sell bags with removable batteries, allowing consumers to temporarily turn their smart luggage into old-fashioned luggage so that they can bring it on a flight, BlueSmart’s batteries were built into the bags, making removing them without damaging the bag nearly impossible.

Internet-connected “smart” suitcases have been the subject of media hype for several years thanks to press-savvy brands like BlueSmart Luggage, the company...

Article Image

JetBlue flight makes emergency landing due to cracked cockpit window

A JetBlue flight destined for Tampa, Florida made an emergency landing on Sunday due to a damaged window.

An outer layer of the cockpit windscreen was damaged, and flight 1052 was diverted to Fort Lauderdale out of “an abundance of caution,” according to JetBlue Corporate Communications.

“On May 6, JetBlue flight 1052 from San Juan to Tampa diverted to Fort Lauderdale in an abundance of caution following a report of damage to one of the outer layers of the cockpit windscreen. The flight landed safely at approximately 1:00 p.m. local time. Customers were accommodated on another aircraft,” the airline said in a statement.

Not uncommon

The cabin did not lose pressurization during the incident, and no passengers were injured. A reporter on board the flight said the pilot informed passengers that this sort of incident “isn’t uncommon”.

"It happens I won't say frequently, but I've actually had this happen before," a flight attendant said in a video recorded by passenger Michael Paluska, a reporter for a local ABC affiliate. "There's multiple, multiple layers in the windscreen, and it's the outer layer that shattered."

"We were not in any grave danger,” the flight attendant added.

The incident comes about three weeks after a Southwest flight experienced mid-air engine failure, resulting in a passenger fatality. The passenger, Jennifer Riordan, was partially sucked out a window that had been knocked out by debris and was later pronounced dead from blunt impact trauma.

Last week, a Southwest flight bound for Newark also made an unplanned landing in Cleveland because of a broken window. The airline said the cabin maintained pressurization throughout and that the plane landed “uneventfully.”

A JetBlue flight destined for Tampa, Florida made an emergency landing on Sunday due to a damaged window.An outer layer of the cockpit windscreen was d...

Article Image

United Airlines apologizes for ’concerning behavior’ from flight attendant

United Airlines has once again apologized for an in-flight incident – this time involving a flight attendant, described by at least one passenger as clearly “drunk or stoned.”

“We are aware of a concerning incident involving a flight attendant serving on our regional service provider Trans States Airlines flight 4689,” United said in a statement released to the media. “As a gesture of goodwill, we have compensated all customers aboard the flight and we apologize for any inconvenience or distress this may have caused.”

As the airline noted, the incident did not occur aboard a United-branded flight, but rather on its regional carrier, on a flight last last week from Denver to Williston, North Dakota. The story broke after one passenger posted her complaint about the flight attendant on Twitter – a Tweet that has since been deleted.

'Threatened lives'

According to KPRC-TV in Houston, which screen-grabbed the Tweet before it was taken down, the passenger complained that the flight attendant's behavior “threatened the lives” of those on board. She said she went to the cockpit to report the behavior and that police were waiting when the plane landed.

It has been a rough 13 months for United's public relations personnel. In April 2017, a physician aboard a United flight traveling from Detroit to Louisville was dragged off the plane by police after he refused to give up his seat, an incident captured in numerous videos that went viral.

Since then, the airline has been involved in a number of unfortunate incidents involving pets traveling in both the cabins and cargo holds of United flights. Most recently, a French bulldog puppy died after a flight attendant reportedly required the owner to place the dog's carrier in an overhead bin, rather than leave it under the seat.

Earlier this month, United announced a new set of policies on transporting pets aimed at promoting their well-being while traveling. In consultation with Humane America, United is banning certain breeds of dogs and cats from the cargo hold, although many smaller animals may still be allowed in the aircraft cabin, as long as their carriers fit under the seat.

United Airlines has once again apologized for an in-flight incident – this time involving a flight attendant, described by at least one passenger as clearl...

Article Image

Cracked window causes Southwest Airlines jet to make unscheduled landing

Southwest Airlines flight 957 made an unscheduled landing in Cleveland Wednesday after a window in the passenger cabin cracked.

The flight, from Chicago to Newark, landed safely. The airline said there were no injuries and stressed that it was an “unscheduled” stop and not and “emergency” landing.

“There are multiple layers of panes in each aircraft window,” Southwest said in a statement. “No emergency landing was declared. The aircraft maintained pressurization, and the flight landed uneventfully in Cleveland.”

The incident comes nearly two weeks after Southwest Flight 1380 lost a window when the left engine exploded, shattering one of the Boeing 737's windows with debris. The plane lost pressurization and the passenger sitting next to the window died when she was nearly sucked from the plane.

The jetliner landed safely in Philadelphia, piloted by 56-year old navy veteran Tammi Jo Shults, who won praise for her professionalism, skill, and calm demeanor.

Passengers react with fear

According to passenger Tweets posted by DansDeals, passengers sitting near the cracked window on flight 957 left their seats in fear. The airline said the unscheduled landing was made out of an abundance of caution.

“The aircraft has been taken out of service for maintenance review, and our local Cleveland employees worked diligently to accommodate the 81 Customers on a new aircraft to Newark,” the airline said.

Southwest has not said what it thinks caused the window to crack. It said there appeared to be no problems with either of the two engines.

Last month's fatal accident was caused by a metal fan blade in the engine breaking, causing the engine to partially come apart. Some of the debris struck a window with enough force to shatter it.

In the wake of that accident Southwest announced an acceleration of its program to inspect CFM56-7B engines used on its Boeing 737 aircraft. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) also said it will issue an airworthiness directive that will require inspections of certain CFM56-7B engines.

Southwest Airlines flight 957 made an unscheduled landing in Cleveland Wednesday after a window in the passenger cabin cracked.The flight, from Chicago...

Article Image

A start-up airline is trying to bring affordable jet travel to smaller cities

After years of mergers, service cutbacks, and shrinking seats, the airline industry may finally face some healthy competition. A start-up airline called OneJet recently announced its first acquisition with the purchase of a longstanding corporate shuttle service called Ultimate Jet Carriers.

With the acquisition, OneJet says it will soon serve over 17 cities, expanding on its current service marketed to commuters in mid-size cities. However, whether the company can successfully compete with airline powerhouses is uncertain.

The consolidation of major airlines has been felt by consumers, particularly those who live in medium-sized and smaller cities where airlines used to offer dependable service. In Indianapolis, for instance, just two airlines now control 56 percent of seats, and fares there are 6 percent above the national average, according to one analysis done in 2015.

Many popular, non-stop, direct flights between smaller cities have been eliminated, with an estimated 1,000 routes cut in recent years. The big four airlines -- United, Delta, Southwest, and American Airlines -- now control 80 percent of air travel in the United States.

Expanding through the growing pains

OneJet is based in Pittsburgh, a mid-size city that has felt the impacts of limited nonstop flying options. The airline currently offers rides on eight-seat jets in 14 mid-size cities, but the company says it will increase the plane size to thirty seats and add more routes with its acquisition of Ultimate Jet Carriers.

The airline says the deal has allowed it to immediately add 20 larger planes to its routes, and it anticipates that a total of 25 planes will be added later this year.

Consumers have complained that their flights on OneJet have sometimes been cancelled after booking. OneJet CEO Matthew Maguire told CNBC that he anticipates that service will become more reliable once the planes are bigger.

“Certainly, when you're growing an airline, there are growing pains," he told the station.

Currently, prices on OneJet are about equal to cheaper than prices offered by other major carriers, according to an analysis by CNBC.

After years of mergers, service cutbacks, and shrinking seats, the airline industry may finally face some healthy competition. A start-up airline called On...

Article Image

United Airlines resets pet transportation policies

After a string of unfortunate events involving pet travel, United Airlines has rolled out a new policy designed to improve the well-being of pets transported by the airline.

A key element of the policy is a ban on certain breeds of dogs and cats from the cargo hold, although many smaller animals may still be allowed in the aircraft cabin, as long as their carriers fit under the seat.

United said it teamed with American Humane to draft the new policy. Jan Krems, United's vice president of cargo, said the organization was helpful in identifying ways to ensure pets traveling as cargo arrive at their destination safely.

“Committed to making significant improvements”

"As we continue our review process to ensure that we are always doing what's right, we are committed to making significant improvements in our program and adhering to the best practices of animal comfort, well-being and travel on behalf of our customers and their pets," Krems said.

When the new policy goes into place June 18, certain breeds of pets will not be allowed in the cargo hold because of potential threats to their health. In particular, breeds with short or snub noses will be excluded since they have been shown to be more vulnerable when flying in the cargo hold.

Under the new policy, Boston Terriers, boxers, pugs, and Pekingese will not qualify as cargo. In addition, Persian and Himalayan cats will be excluded.

Limited to dogs and cats

Cargo will also be limited to dogs and cats. United said it will no longer accept other types of animals, unless they can ride in carriers that fit beneath a seat in the aircraft cabin.

In 2017, two dogs died weeks apart while traveling on United. Weeks later, an animal breeder complained that her rabbit died while on a United flight from the U.S. to the UK.

More recently, a French bulldog puppy died on a United flight from Houston to New York, prompting the airline to suspend pet transportation until it could revise its policies.

The changes to United's pet travel program will also suspend pet cargo travel to and from Las Vegas, Palm Springs, Phoenix, and Tucson between May 1 and September 30 because of extreme heat.

Dr. Robin Ganzert, American Humane's CEO, says the group saw it as part of its mission to assist United with its PetSafe program.

"Transporting pets introduces a variety of risks and when United approached us, we knew we had to take on the challenge of helping improve and ensure the health, safety and comfort of so many animals," Ganzert said.

After a string of unfortunate events involving pet travel, United Airlines has rolled out a new policy designed to improve the well-being of pets transport...

Article Image

Delta Air Lines staff accused of tying disabled woman to a wheelchair

Delta Air Lines, facing accusations that employees tied a woman with multiple sclerosis (MS) to a wheelchair, is apologizing for the “perception” that customers have of its service.

Maria Saliagas and her husband travel from their home in Atlanta to Europe every year and had no plans of stopping, even after she was diagnosed with MS five years ago.

When they arrived in Amsterdam for this year’s trip on April 1 , Delta employees could not find a wheelchair equipped with straps to support her back.  So the employees instead placed her in chair with inadequate back support and used a dirty blanket to secure her, according to an account her son gave.

“The Delta employee thought it would be appropriate to tie my mother with someone else's dirty blanket, in such a way it has left bruise marks on her arms,” Nathan Saliagas wrote in a Facebook post. “When she started crying, she was told to 'shut the [expletive] up' or she will be 'left there.'”

After his account was reported by the local news. Delta issued a statement that hedged somewhere between an apology and a defense.

“We regret the perception our service has left on these customers. We have reached out to them, not only to resolve their concerns, but also ensure that their return flight exceeds expectations,” says a statement that a Delta representative sent WSB-TV.

The couple is scheduled to return to Atlanta on April 30.

“Intolerable conditions”

People who use wheelchairs have long described intolerable conditions while flying, and they say that the situation has worsened as seating gets tighter than ever. Reporting from the Government Accountability Office has found that complaints from disabled air travelers more than doubled between 2005 and 2015.

Airlines are exempt from the American Disabilities Act and have resisted calls to make planes more friendly for the disabled, claiming such upgrades could cost billions of dollars.  

Passengers are typically barred from bringing their own wheelchairs on airplanes. Instead they must depend on temporary wheelchairs issued by airline staff for help boarding and getting off the flight.

During the flight, passengers’ motorized wheelchairs are often stored in the cargo hold. In numerous cases, motorized wheelchairs have been returned to their owners in pieces, leaving travelers stranded once they arrive at their destinations. Disabled people have called on airlines to better train staff about how to properly handle motorized wheelchairs.

While airlines are required to publicly report lost luggage, delayed flights, or animals that were killed or injured in their care, the same does not apply to wheelchairs. That was scheduled to change this year, until Trump took office.

After five years of public debate, the Obama administration finalized a rule that would have required airlines to publicly report damaged or lost wheelchairs. But several months before the rule was scheduled to go in effect in January 2018, the Trump administration delayed its implementation for another year, sparking a lawsuit from the  Paralyzed Veterans of America.

Delta Air Lines, facing accusations that employees tied a woman with multiple sclerosis (MS) to a wheelchair, is apologizing for the “perception” that cust...

Article Image

Southwest engine inspections cause weekend delays

Travelers returning home on Sunday on Southwest Airlines encountered a few delays as the carrier cancelled about 40 flights for engine inspections.

In a statement, Southwest said the flight disruptions were the result of its decision to step up its ongoing engine fan blade inspection program, looking for signs of metal fatigue. An engine blade separated from an engine in mid-flight last Tuesday, killing a passenger aboard Southwest Airlines flight 1380.

"We have minimized flight disruptions this past week through actions such as proactive aircraft routings to cover open trips, performing inspections overnight, and utilizing spare aircraft, when available," the company said.

"On Sunday, we only canceled about 40 flights due to fan blade inspections out of a planned schedule of almost 4,000 flights. The cancellations are minimal -- roughly 1 percent of scheduled flights."

Delays not related to FAA order

The airline stressed that the flight disruptions had nothing to do with the Federal Aviation Administration's (FAA) Emergency Airworthiness Directive that requires airlines flying planes using the CFM56-7B engine to inspect those engines within 20 days. Southwest said its existing inspection program “meets or exceeds” the requirements set out in the FAA directive.

The CFM56-7B is a commonly used engine on a Boeing 737, which makes up the Southwest Airlines fleet.

In the immediate aftermath of last week's accident, Southwest said it would accelerate its own engine fan blade inspection program. The initial investigation of last week's accident revealed that a titanium blade from one of the Boeing 737's engines separated and shattered a window, gravely injuring the passenger sitting next to it.

The accident occurred about 20 minutes after the jet took off from New York's Laguardia Airport on a flight to Dallas. The pilot made a heroic emergency landing at Philadelphia as passengers fought to keep the injured passenger from being sucked out of the plane. The passenger died at a Philadelphia hospital.

Southwest says the voluntary inspection program will continue this week and may affect operations. It advises travelers to visit Southwest.com frequently to check flight status.

Travelers returning home on Sunday on Southwest Airlines encountered a few delays as the carrier cancelled about 40 flights for engine inspections.In a...

Article Image

Southwest Airlines engine probe focuses on metal fatigue

Federal safety investigators continue to examine the engine of a Southwest Airlines jet that killed a passenger when it exploded in midair. They suggest it could be linked to a similar incident that occurred in 2016.

A team from the National Transportation Safety Board reports that a preliminary inspection shows a metal fan blade failed, the same thing that happened two years ago. In that incident, a Southwest jet powered by the same type of engine landed safely in Florida after a blade separated from the engine.

But the incident Tuesday had fatal consequences. A woman passenger seated by a window died when metal debris from the engine shattered the window, hitting her and nearly sucking her out of the aircraft. Several other passengers were injured, but the plane landed safely in Philadelphia.

Investigators say metal fatigue was the likely cause of the accident, and Southwest Airlines has announced an acceleration of its program to inspect CFM56-7B engines used on its Boeing 737 aircraft.

The inspections won't be limited to Southwest jets. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) said it will issue an airworthiness directive that will require inspections of certain CFM56-7B engines.

The agency said it plans to require an ultrasonic inspection of fan blades when they reach a certain number of takeoffs and landings. Any blades that fail the inspection will have to be replaced.

According to Boeing, the CFM56-7B engine is used on more than 8,000 Boeing 737 jet aircraft.

Federal safety investigators continue to examine the engine of a Southwest Airlines jet that killed a passenger when it exploded in midair. They suggest it...

Article Image

Southwest Airlines passenger dies after engine explodes

Southwest Airlines says it is accelerating its engine inspection program after an exploding Boeing 737 engine nearly caused a flight to crash Tuesday morning.

One passenger on the New York to Dallas flight died and several others were injured as the pilot struggled to land the crippled aircraft at Philadelphia.

Jennifer Riordan, a 43-year-old mother of two, was listed as the fatality. She was seated next to a window that shattered when debris from the exploding engine hit it. The loss of pressurization nearly pulled the passenger through the small opening. She died at a Philadelphia hospital after the plane made an emergency landing.

Many passengers took to social media to sing the praises of Southwest pilot Tammie Jo Shults, who calmly informed air traffic control that part of her aircraft was missing. Once the plane was on the ground, passengers said Shults stood by the plane's exit and thanked each passenger for their bravery during the ordeal.

First female F-18 pilot

Shultz has plenty of experience in difficult situations. She is a U.S. Navy veteran and the first woman to fly F-18s, making hundreds of carrier landings. The 56-year-old aviator later served as a navy flight instructor.

Passengers said they heard a loud noise not long after the plane took off from Laguardia Airport and felt a steep drop, with oxygen masks falling from the overhead compartment. Metal debris from the plane's engine broke out the window where Riordan was seated.

“We are deeply saddened to confirm that there is one fatality resulting from this accident,” the airline said in a statement. “The entire Southwest Airlines Family is devastated and extends its deepest, heartfelt sympathy to the customers, employees, family members and loved ones affected by this tragic event.”

Investigation underway

The National Transportation Safety Board is investigating to determine why the engine exploded. In the meantime, Southwest said it would step up inspections of CFM56 engines, the type that failed. The airline said the acceleration is being done “out of an abundance of caution” and expects the inspections to be completed within 30 days.

Passengers aboard another Southwest flight over the weekend said they feared for their lives when the Boeing 737 attempted to land in a violent thunderstorm. Flight 3461, from Fort Lauderdale to New Orleans, encountered violent weather as it approached Louis Armstrong Airport.

Lauren Bale, an employee of WWL-TV in New Orleans, was a passenger on the flight and told the station she thought the plane was going to crash.

“I wasn't sure what was going to happen,” she told the station. “I was texting my family. It seemed we were really close to the ground, and just the way the plane was moving back and forth and everyone screaming, it was really intense.”

The plane aborted the landing in New Orleans and touched down safely in Panama City, Fla.

Southwest Airlines says it is accelerating its engine inspection program after an exploding Boeing 737 engine nearly caused a flight to crash Tuesday morni...

Article Image

Airlines returning to service as a way to lure travelers

In a desperate bid to regain profitability a decade ago, airlines slashed services and added fees for things that once were free.

It worked, and now that airlines are back in the black, customer service in the skies is improving.

A year ago, Airlines For America (A4A) Vice President and Chief Economist John Heimlich said that airlines are now trying to gain passengers with low fares and service improvements, like adding more nonstop routes. He said the industry also increased the supply of scheduled seats at U.S. airports in markets large and small.

This week, United Airlines rolled out a new package of in-flight entertainment options. Passengers on flights equipped with Wi-Fi can purchase the DIRECTV package to view on their smartphones and tablets.

Using more personal devices

Since February, United says it has installed personal device entertainment onto more than 200 aircraft that previously only offered DIRECTV. Customers can now use a personal laptop, Apple iOS device, or Android device to access a library of complimentary movies and TV shows, in addition to having the opportunity to purchase DIRECTV to view live programming.

"Whether it is seatback on-demand, DIRECTV or personal device entertainment, we offer customers hundreds of hours of programming to enjoy during their travels," said Mark Krolick, vice president of marketing at United Airlines. "We're excited to expand our personal device entertainment offering, which has been a popular option amongst many of our customers who tend to bring their own devices when they travel."

Because so many travelers now watch content on their smartphones, United said it will distribute small cardboard stands to passengers during the peak summer travel months. The stands can hold a smartphone on the pull-down tray table, allowing for hands-free viewing.

Outlets for charging

The airline said it is also installing electric power outlets in aircraft seats to help passengers keep their devices charged. To learn what entertainment options will be provided aboard a particular flight, passengers can access an entertainment listings webpage.

Wall Street investors are not always happy when airlines plow profits back into improving service, believing they should be distributed to stockholders instead.

When TheStreet.com recently rated the top 10 airline stocks, Alaska Airlines, which is consistently rated among the best for customer service, didn't make the list.

In a desperate bid to regain profitability a decade ago, airlines slashed services and added fees for things that once were free.It worked, and now tha...

Article Image

Consumers give high marks to Asian airlines

Singapore Airlines is the favorite carrier for international travelers while Southwest is consumers' favorite U.S. airline, according to the latest TripAdvisor rankings.

The travel website analyzed consumer feedback over a 12-year period, ranking the world's airlines for customer satisfaction.

Bryan Saltzburg, senior vice president and general manager for TripAdvisor Flights, says the industry has introduced new competitive fare products, along with new in-flight services. Those that can improve service and keep fares reasonable, he says, do well with consumers.

“Consumers continue to seek out the carriers that deliver value and a quality experience,” he said.

Among international airlines, carriers based in Asia did particularly well. Japan Airlines, EVA Air, and Korean Air joined Singapore Airlines in the top 10. Two airlines based in the Middle East – Emirates and Qatar Airways – also made the top 10.

Besides being the overall number one pick among travelers, Singapore Airlines won the categories of best first class and best economy class. Qatar Airways won the best business class category.

Southwest the highest-ranking North American carrier

Southwest Airlines was the highest ranking domestic airline in the international rankings, placing sixth behind Taiwan-based EVA Air and just ahead of Jet2, based in the UK. Southwest won praise for its on-time flights and the level of its service.

Posting a recent review on ConsumerAffairs, Murray, of Scottsdale, Ariz., also praised Southwest's service, saying he was treated like family.

“Last minute changes happen,” Murray wrote. “I was treated with such warm humility, I was blown away by the compassion and understanding on a very busy Sunday morning. Just wanted to say thank you from a very happy and homebound traveler.”

Among North American airlines, Alaska Airlines, Delta, Hawaiian Airlines, JetBlue, and WestJet joined Southwest in earning travelers' praise. Southwest was voted the best economy class service and JetBlue took honors for best business class.

Singapore Airlines is the favorite carrier for international travelers while Southwest is consumers' favorite U.S. airline, according to the latest TripAdv...

Article Image

Delta Air Lines admits customer credit card data accessed in hack

An online customer chat service company used by Delta Air Lines and other major corporations has been hacked, exposing an unknown number of customers’ credit card information.

In a statement, Delta Airlines said that he attack occurred from September 21 to October 12 last year,  “and that during this time certain customer payment information... may have been accessed.” However, the airline denied that customer’s passport or government IDs were accessed.

The airline told Bloomberg News that the breach could have exposed the payment data of “several hundred thousand customers.” The actual hack targeted a chat service provider called [24]7.ai that is used by numerous companies, including Sears. The retailer released a similar warning to consumers.

Delta says they are currently working with law enforcement to see who was behind the beach. In the meantime, the airline promises that any fraudulent purchases will be refunded.

Customers who entered their credit card payment manually are at risk; the airline says its automatic popular payment program called Delta Wallet was not breached.

An online customer chat service company used by Delta Air Lines and other major corporations has been hacked, exposing an unknown number of customers’ cred...

Article Image

Airline deregulation -- sky high profits for carriers, but no silver linings for flyers

Ticket prices up, seat sizes down, extra charges for almost anything that can be turned into a profit center -- everything seems to be fair game for the airline industry.

While industry-wide revenues from passengers grew 9 percent in 2017 -- leading to earnings estimated at $581 billion -- flyer advocacy groups are saying it’s a win-lose situation for consumers, who are getting the short end of the deal. And there’s even more on the horizon for airlines if the Trump administration’s push for deregulation sees the light of day.

Over the last four years, the seven largest U.S. airlines have averaged $19.65 “profit per passenger” per one-way trip, according to the Wall Street Journal. That’s up from an average post-tax profit per passenger of $2.05 in 2012.

While $19.65 seems like a fair amount, it’s the gravy that’s churned out of everything else -- from seat upgrades and baggage fees to high-priced in-flight services -- that might raise red flags for consumers.

Some examples include:

  • Delta Air Lines charging a $200 change fee for domestic flights and up to $500 for international flights;

  • Southwest recently canceling its “$5 Happy Hour;” and

  • American Airlines charging $75 for award tickets booked less than 21 days prior to departure.

Pushing out third-party sites

You may have thought that every trick in the book has been tried, but not yet. Nearly 50 airlines are now holding auctions for upgrades to business and first class. Some carriers are even considering ripping out the chairback entertainment screens on the assumption that most flyers carry a digital device they can use. In turn, using those devices might call for internet access, which the carrier is probably more than happy to sell them.

To make matters worse, third-party airfare aggregators like Kayak, Momondo, and CheapOair (an Authorized Partner) might also get yanked to the chopping block.

“The airlines are working to eliminate providers of independent travel information through actions including withholding schedules from consumers’ favorite travel websites, or refusing to allow them to display airfares, which are public information,” Kevin Mitchell, Chairman of the Business Travel Coalition, told ConsumerAffairs.

“Some airlines actually demand that travel websites pay the airline for helping them sell you a plane ticket. You read that correctly – the airlines not only want to collect the price of the ticket from you, but on top of that, they want the travel website - that enabled you to easily compare all of your options before selling you a ticket - to pay the airline, too.”

“Wringing” money out of travelers

With airline profits clearly above the clouds, has the industry’s eagerness to fill seats gone too far? There are flyer advocacy groups that think so, and they are trying to keep carriers mindful that the passenger deserves better.

FlyersRights.org has crafted a “passenger bill of rights” that ask for changes on everything from seat size to compensation for excessive flight delays and cancellations. The organization has also proposed several reforms to improve passenger well-being and deal with common issues that often occur in airports.

Those requests include ending the ability of airlines to overschedule flights at popular times (which often creates chronic delays and deceptive schedules) and encouraging the use of larger aircraft to reduce congestion for long haul flights.

FlyersRights also thinks many regulators may be turning a blind eye to how airports are leveraging extra revenue. Among their concerns are airport revenue from parking fees and taxi services and how things like airport shopping and remote car rental centers are “wringing more revenue from passengers.”

Recent estimates show that total airport revenues have grown nearly 50 percent since 2000.

Does anyone really care about the passenger?

One would think that United Airlines’ public relations calamities, which include a passenger getting dragged off a flight and the recent death of a dog, would raise some industry concern on the perceived value of a customer. However, advocates say that getting the attention of airliners is like rolling a boulder up a mountain.

“In short, they want to do what they want, without regard to comfort or well-being of the passenger,” reported Douglas Kidd, executive director of the National Association of Airline Passengers, after attending the US Chamber of Commerce Aviation Summit on March 1. “Both the airline reps and the TSA head spoke in glowing terms of the passenger experience and the passenger perspective, without any real appreciation of either subject.”

But despite the Trump administration’s desire to deregulate the airline industry and kowtow to their wishes, there’s one congressperson who’s taken up at least part of the fight.

U.S. Senator Susan Collins of Maine is spearheading an effort that would require the U.S. Department of Transportation to clearly disclose charges for airline fares, baggage fees, itinerary changes, and anything else that might cost travelers money.

“I’m not trying to dictate what airlines can charge, or what services they can charge for," she said, in an interview with Maine Public. "But I do believe there should be complete transparency.”

Ticket prices up, seat sizes down, extra charges for almost anything that can be turned into a profit center -- everything seems to be fair game for the ai...

Article Image

United Airlines suspends transport of pets in cargo hold

United Airlines is suspending new reservations for cargo-hold pet transportations after several incidents occured last week, leading to a wave of negative publicity. 
Kokito, a 10-month old French bulldog, died last week after a flight attendant insisted that the carrier in which he was being transported be stowed in an overhead bin for the duration of the four-hour flight. Days later, several dogs were sent to the wrong destinations. 
The airline says it’s taking time to review its pet program to ensure incidents like these don’t happen again. 

Reviewing its pet program

The airline will honor reservations confirmed as of March 20 for pets scheduled to fly in the cargo hold, but it will not accept new reservations. The review is expected to be complete by May 1. The suspension will not affect pets traveling in the cabin. 
"We are conducting a thorough and systematic review of our program for pets that travel in the cargo compartment to make improvements that will ensure the best possible experience for our customers and their pets," said United spokesman Charlie Hobart. 
United said it will partner with “independent experts” in pet safety, comfort, and travel in order to achieve this outcome.
In addition to conducting a review, United recently updated its guidelines for dogs traveling in bags. The airline said it would require bags containing animals in the cabin to have a brightly colored tag attached to keep live animals from being placed in overhead lockers.  
Following the recent death of a dog aboard a United flight, two senators introduced a bipartisan bill called the Welfare of Our Furry Friends (WOOFF) Act. The legislation would prohibit putting animals in overhead bins on flights. It would also direct the Federal Aviation Administration to impose fines for putting animals in overhead bins. 
United had the worst rate of pet deaths in 2017 of any U.S. airline, according to the Department of Transportation’s Air Travel Consumer Report.

United Airlines is suspending new reservations for cargo-hold pet transportations after several incidents occured last week, leading to a wave of negative...

Article Image

Airlines ask for industry-wide rule changes as part of Trump’s deregulation push

Major airlines have banded together and released a wish list of regulations that the industry would like to see the Trump administration repeal -- many of which were originally designed to protect travelers.

If those wishes come true, the protection that travelers have gotten used to will move to the back of the plane. Gone will be dozens of rights travelers have enjoyed in recent years -- from the option of deplaning a flight that’s sat on the tarmac for more than three hours to seeing all taxes and fees in an airline’s advertised fare.

“The lesson for us in Washington is to remove all onerous burdens,” said Derek Kan, the Department of Transportation’s (DOT) undersecretary for policy, in explaining the Trump Administration’s goal.

While Kan emphasized that regulations that are “critical for safety” will “remain untouched,” the DOT’s viewpoint is that there are a number of regulations that “do not seem to have a cost-benefit” justification.

Deregulation would “gut” consumer protections

Airlines for America (A4A), a D.C.-based trade association and lobbying group that describes themselves as “advocates on behalf of its members to shape crucial policies and measures that promote safety, security and a healthy U.S. airline industry” appears to be the pilot of this effort.

The organization wants to see more than 30 regulations abolished, and it has the wind of all the major airlines beneath its wings, too. The group’s members transport more than 90 percent of U.S. airline passenger and cargo traffic.

Flyer advocates see a different picture, however. “There is nothing wrong with trimming back unnecessary regulations, but airlines now want no regulation or self regulation,” Paul Hudson, President of FlyersRights.org and member of the FAA Aviation Rulemaking Committee, told ConsumerAffairs.

“That would gut the few consumer protections passengers have. And oh, airlines of course want to keep regulations that help them like prohibitions on foreign competition, antitrust exemptions and effective bars on new airport construction to relieve congestion.”

How this may affect your next flight

Among the list of potential regulations the airline industry might be looking to reverse are consumer rules that the DOT put in place in 2011 under the Obama administration. They include:

  • A passengers’ ability to hold a reservation without payment, or cancel a booking without penalty, for 24 hours after the reservation is made, if they make the reservation one week or more prior to a flight’s departure date;

  • An airline requirement to promptly notify passengers of flight delays of over 30 minutes, as well as flight cancellations and diversions;

  • Restrictions that prohibit an airline from increasing the price of passengers’ ticket after it is bought;

  • A requirement that all mandatory taxes and fees must be included together in the advertised fare;

  • A requirement that airlines and ticket agents have to disclose baggage fees to consumers when they book a flight online; and

  • The tarmac delay rule, which currently gives passengers the option to deplane if the plane they’re on was sitting on the tarmac for more than three hours.

“Airline passengers have rights, and they should be able to expect fair and reasonable treatment when booking a trip and when they fly,” U.S. Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood said when the new rules were established. “The new passenger protections are a continuation of our effort to help air travelers receive the respect they deserve."

Major airlines have banded together and released a wish list of regulations that the industry would like to see the Trump administration repeal -- many of...

Article Image

Dog dies on United flight after being stored in overhead bin

A 10-month-old puppy died Monday on a United Airlines flight after a flight attendant allegedly told its owner to store the animal and its carrier in an overhead locker. Passenger Maggie Gremminger said she witnessed a flight attendant instruct the dog’s owner to stow the carrier with the dog inside in an overhead bin.

“The pet owner was very adamant that she did not want to put the pet carrier up above,” Gremminger said.

“She was saying verbally, ‘My dog is in here, no, this is my dog.’ The flight attendant, in response, really just continued to ask her to put it above because it was a hazard where it was, it was a safety emergency, someone could trip.”

Once the dog, Kokito, was found dead, Gremminger said the flight attendant became “frazzled” and insisted she didn’t know there was a dog in the carrier. However, passengers say the flight attendant was aware that the dog was in there because he barked though takeoff.

"We didn't know it was barking a cry for help," Gremminger posted on Twitter. By the time the plane landed almost four hours later, the French bulldog was dead.

“Tragic accident”

United apologized Tuesday for the death of the passenger's dog, calling it a “tragic accident.” A United spokesperson said the death “should never have occurred, as pets should never be placed in the overhead bin."

“We assume full responsibility for this tragedy and express our deepest condolences to the family and are committed to supporting them,” United said in a statement.

The airline said it is refunding the family’s tickets, paying for a necropsy, and “thoroughly investigating what occured to prevent this from ever happening again.”

Highest number of animal deaths of any carrier

According to United's pet policy, animals must be in a carrier and "fit completely under the seat in front of the customer and remain there at all times."

In 2017, 18 animals died and 13 were injured while flying through United’s PetSafe cargo program, according to data from the Department of Transportation. That works out to a rate of 2.24 per 10,000 transported animals.

Last year, two women blamed the airline for the deaths of their dogs in incidents that occured just weeks apart.

A golden retriever named Jacob died just hours after disembarking from a United flight. “His stomach flipped due to the stress of his journey that was 20 hours longer than expected, and suffocated his organs,” Jacob’s owner wrote on Facebook after the incident.

In a separate incident, a pit bull terrier named Sadie arrived deceased to a layover. The airline contended that each of the deaths were caused by “preexisting conditions.”

A 10-month-old puppy died Monday on a United Airlines flight after a flight attendant allegedly told its owner to store the animal and its carrier in an ov...

Article Image

United Airlines reverses its plans for a lottery bonus program

Following swift backlash from employees, United Airlines has scrapped its plans to replace quarterly employee bonuses with a lottery-based employee reward system.

The lottery would have caused a majority of the airline’s 90,000 workers to lose bonuses that paid up to $1,500 over the course of the year. Instead, it would pay $100,000 to one employee selected at random and smaller bonuses of $2,000 or $5,000 in cash, vacations, or prizes to about 1,300 or more.

"Our intention was to introduce a better, more exciting program, but we misjudged how these changes would be received by many of you," United's president, Scott Kirby, said in a note to employees.

‘Pressing the pause button’

When United first unveiled its plans for the program, called “core4 Score Rewards,” the airline said it hoped offering meaningful rewards would “build excitement and a sense of accomplishment with more bang for the buck.”

But employees were quick to voice their dissatisfaction with the program.  

“This is a horrible idea. Completely against what the word United means,” wrote a flight attendant on the airline employees’ private Facebook page. “It is obviously a method of cutting costs, but to come at the expense of employee morale is a wondrous thing to behold.”

“It is beyond interesting to see you try to spin a fraction of a percent chance at winning anything as better than an actual quarterly bonus for our performance as a company.”

Now, United says it is “pressing the pause button” on the program as it reviews employee feedback.

Following swift backlash from employees, United Airlines has scrapped its plans to replace quarterly employee bonuses with a lottery-based employee reward...

Article Image

United Airlines ditches employee bonuses and moves to big-prize lottery system

United Airlines is swapping out its employee bonus structure for a unique lottery-based reward system.

Out are potential quarterly bonuses of $300 and in are some 1,300 quarterly prizes ranging from $2,000 in cash to vacations, a Mercedes-Benz, and even a $100,000 payout.

“Offering meaningful rewards will build excitement and a sense of accomplishment with more bang for the buck,” said United Airlines President Scott Kirby in a memo to airline employees about the new program called “core4 Score Rewards.”

“We want every United team member to picture themselves walking home with a grand prize, or driving home in a beautiful car that announces for all to see that you are committed to your success and ours.”

The carrier’s new focus on positive employee and customer experiences and couldn't come at a better time. United’s skies have been anything but friendly ever since a passenger was dragged off one of its aircraft and it faced a scandal over the death of a pet last year.

Nice prizes, yes. Happy employees, no.

However, United’s best-laid plans for the new bonus structure were met with an instant brouhaha from its employees.  

“This is a horrible idea. Completely against what the word United means,” wrote a flight attendant on the airline employees’ private Facebook page. “It is obviously a method of cutting costs, but to come at the expense of employee morale is a wondrous thing to behold.”

“It is beyond interesting to see you try to spin a fraction of a percent chance at winning anything as better than an actual quarterly bonus for our performance as a company.”

More than 1,000 people echoed their dissatisfaction via a petition at Change.org, but the airline forced the petition’s author to take it down.

Cost-cutting measure?

In United’s previous bonus program, bonuses ranged from $63 up to $7,500 and employees felt the awards were achievable by almost everyone. In the new lottery-based structure, fewer than 1,361 employees have a chance to win something, leaving most of the airline’s 86,000 employees out of luck.

To add insult to injury, an individual employee is only eligible for United’s lottery if they are able to maintain a perfect attendance record.

If you shine a light on the underbelly of United’s calculator, it’s apparent the real bonus goes back to the airline. ThePointsGuy chased down the ugly truth of the airline’s maneuver and estimated the airline is potentially saving more than $36 million a year in bonuses, a windfall bolstered by the new bonus program’s $18.8 million cap.

United Airlines is swapping out its employee bonus structure for a unique lottery-based reward system.Out are potential quarterly bonuses of $300 and i...

Article Image

Southwest ends its $5 happy hour deal

Southwest Airlines’ “$5 Happy Hour, every hour” is no more. The U.S.-based airline, which has long offered some of the cheapest prices on cocktail and beer selections, is raising its menu prices $1 to $2, though the changes won’t apply to consumers who are part of Southwest’s frequent flier or drink coupon program.

An airline spokesman defended the price increase, telling USA Today that its drink prices are still competitive. The airline has not raised its drink prices since 2009, the spokesman added.

In 2015, Southwest introduced an expanded $5 cocktail menu along with a series of more important service improvements -- like faster internet, better on-time performance, and wider seats. Southwest hasn’t announced whether any of the other features it rolled out at the time will be affected.

The airline famously does not assign seats on flights, but customers can be in the first boarding group for a fee, which Southwest also recently increased.

Lush fliers who don’t want to pay inflated prices for an airplane shot have an even cheaper option, for Southwest or any other airline. The Transportation Security Administration (TSA) allows travelers to carry as many airplane shots on board that can fit into one quart-sized, clear, zip-top plastic bag.

Technically, passengers are banned from serving themselves their own booze mid-flight, per FAA regulations. But air travel experts say they found a loophole to get around that. According to travel blogger Gilbert Otto, you can “politely ask a member of the cabin crew if they wouldn’t’ mind serving you the liquor you brought on board."

Southwest Airlines’ “$5 Happy Hour, every hour” is no more. The U.S.-based airline, which has long offered some of the cheapest prices on cocktail and beer...

Article Image

American Airlines adds on a 'no frills' option for flights to Europe

Beginning in April, American Airlines will offer trans-Atlantic fliers the option of a lower-priced “Basic Economy” ticket.

The carrier’s overseas partners British Airways, Finnair, and Iberia are also participating in the new fare program.

“We're following the same playbook in this latest expansion as we did for the initial rollout of Basic Economy,” American Airlines commented in an announcement. “That includes training that began this week for Airports and Reservations team members and making it available in a limited number of markets first to make sure we get it right.”

What to expect

For domestic travelers who are used to the Basic Economy option, or regular passengers on low-cost carriers like Southwest and Ryanair, this won’t be much of a switch. But those who expect old-fashioned comfort and service on an international flight or who have never flown Basic Economy might be in for a rude awakening.

Here are the changes:

  • Tickets: Non-refundable, but changeable for a fee. American hasn’t announced that fee yet, but it’s currently charging $750 to change an international ticket.

  • Boarding: Trans-Atlantic Basic Economy customers will board in Group 8, but Elite and eligible AAdvantage credit card members will get Priority or preferred boarding flying on the new fare. This is the same plan American rolled out for its domestic flights last year.

  • Seat assignments: Customers flying trans-Atlantic Basic Economy can purchase a seat assignment at any time or roll the dice and opt for a free, automatic seat assignment when checking in.

  • Baggage: A new fee will apply for the first checked bag on trans-Atlantic Basic Economy. American hasn’t released details, but Delta and United charge $25. As for carry-on bags, the allowance will be one personal item and one larger carry-on.

  • In-flight service: No change. Basic Economy fliers will have the same experience, including free entertainment, soft drinks, snacks, and meals offered to Main Cabin fliers.

  • Upgrades: Not permitted, no matter what your status level is.

How to find your best deal

The majority of fliers – some 56 percent -- looking for the best fares use online travel agencies such as Kayak and Farecompare, according to PhoCusWright, a travel technology firm. Consumers can also sign up for fare tracking updates so they can catch the most attractive fare at the right time.

One key thing to keep in mind is that it’s important to understand what the price includes by reading the fine print. Amenities like extra baggage, seat assignments, and pre-boarding might not be part and parcel of what you assume you’re getting in a “Basic Economy” deal and could cost you a pretty penny should you ask for those items after you book the flight.

Beginning in April, American Airlines will offer trans-Atlantic fliers the option of a lower-priced “Basic Economy” ticket.The carrier’s overseas partn...

Article Image

FAA sets its sights on 'smart' suitcases

The impulse of tech start-ups to connect any and every object to your smartphone is beginning to blow up, both figuratively and literally. After Samsung admitted last year that its Galaxy Note smartphones had an occasional tendency to explode, airlines banned the phones and began scrutinizing other objects containing lithium-ion batteries.

The airline industry is now zeroing in on “smart” suitcases, or bags that promise to go above and beyond the normal duty of carrying your stuff. Beginning January 15, all major airline carriers plan to make passengers remove the batteries that power their bags before they clear security, essentially turning a $400 smart suitcase into an overpriced, regular suitcase. And if the batteries aren’t removable, then airlines won’t let the bag get anywhere near the plane.

Customers who love their smart bags can blame the Federal Aviation Administration. "The FAA has been very, very clear in its guidance to air carriers, that lithium-ion batteries stored in the cargo hold present an unacceptable risk,” FAA spokesman Gregory Martin tells ConsumerAffairs.

Smart bag makers face regulatory scrutiny

A slew of companies jumped on the “smart” bag trend several years ago. One company called Raden advertises that it is the only maker of suitcases with batteries that are removable -- allowing travelers to use the bags and remain in compliance next year.

Longtime suitcase maker Samsonite introduced its own GeoTracker line as well, though advertising does not indicate if that battery can be removed. Away Travel, which sells hard suitcases with built-in chargers, says in their advertising that “we don’t make ‘smart’ luggage, we make thoughtful luggage.”

Perhaps no company has received as much glowing press as BlueSmart, the company that claims to be the “World’s First Smart, Connected Carry-On” and launched with the help of 10,000 crowd-sourced investors in 2014.

Since then, BlueSmart and its pricey suitcases have been featured in publications like the New York Times -- at least four times. The company estimates that it has sold 65,000 bags.

There’s just one problem: the batteries in BlueSmart’s luggage cannot be removed, the company admits. Therefore, the bags cannot go on a plane. In statements on its website and to ConsumerAffairs, BlueSmart is trying to assure the public that they will get this turned around.

“DOT [the Department of Transportation] has already reviewed our products and all the technical documentation. The products passed all the necessary reviews and we are now waiting to get the formal letter of approval,” BlueSmart tells ConsumerAffairs in a statement.

But the FAA, the agency that regulates the airline industry, has no record of meeting with any particular smart suitcase company, according to agency spokesman Gregory Martin.

Told of this, BlueSmart says they met with people higher-up in the department.  “It wasn't the FAA that we met with. We went straight to the DOT. The FAA follow the guidelines of the DOT.” (As of publishing, BlueSmart could not name who in the DOT that they actually met with).

BlueSmart’s website similarly downplays the pending airline ban. “While most airlines understand and approve of smart luggage, others might still be getting up to speed,”  BlueSmart writes on its website. “To overcome this, we have organized meetings with the world’s leading airlines to make sure that your Bluesmart will be approved.”

Told of this, FAA spokesman Martin reiterates that his agency is strongly urging airlines to not allow lithium-ion batteries in the cargo hold. He also clarifies that the FAA is responsible for creating its own regulations.

"We're a part of the Department of Transportation, but the FAA sets the regulations that ensure aviation safety,” Martin says.

Batteries must be removed

Away Travel tells ConsumerAffairs that their batteries "are easily removable and therefore, fully compliant with the new airline regulations." Samsonite says that they have stopped selling their smart bags, but adds that the batteries in purchased bags are removable. 

American American Airlines, Delta, Alaska Airlines, and Virgin Airlines say that all customers with smart bags “must be able to remove the battery in case the bag has to be checked at any point in the customer’s journey” beginning January 15. The International Air Transport Association, a trade group representing nineteen international airlines, followed suit, announcing the same policy to take effect next year.

Whether the smart luggage industry will adapt by making their batteries removable remains to be seen. But there are other reasons to re-think smart bag purchases, or at least to wait until the technology improves.

Customers reviewing BlueSmart’s application for Android on Google Play complain that the GPS-tracking app does not connect properly to their smartphone. BlueSmart responds that the application is getting improved and updated.

“As for Android, we are constantly working on updates,” the company writes. “We've redesigned the whole app experience and architecture for the iOS app and are constantly rolling out these updates across our Android app too.”

The impulse of tech start-ups to connect any and every object to your smartphone is beginning to blow up, both figuratively and literally. After Samsung ad...

Article Image

Trump scraps proposal for airlines to disclose baggage fees

The Trump administration is scrapping an Obama-era proposal that would have required airlines to disclose baggage fees upfront, alongside listed airfare prices. 

Though passengers rarely fly without luggage, airlines officially characterize carry-on and checked bags as “optional” services. This label allows airlines to keep bag fees hidden when customers are booking plane tickets online or over the telephone. 

The Obama administration last year proposed a requirement that airlines list their baggage fees at the start of the booking process, a measure intended to make shopping for tickets easier and more transparent for consumers. The Department of Transportation also proposed a requirement that airlines disclose how much they earn annually in optional service fees. 

In 2015, airlines earned a reported $3.8 billion in baggage fees. Unsurprisingly, the industry was opposed to the fee transparency measures. 

"Dictating to the airline industry distribution and commercial practices would only benefit those third parties who distribute tickets, not the flying public,” lobbying group Airlines for America said at the time

The Department of Transportation announced this week that it is withdrawing both proposals because they provide “limited public benefit.”

The Trump administration is scrapping an Obama-era proposal that would have required airlines to disclose baggage fees upfront, alongside listed airfare pr...

Article Image

How to improve your chance of getting an airline upgrade

Getting an upgrade from coach to business or first class is not as common as it once was, but air travel experts say it still happens. Understanding how the airlines select passengers for an upgrade can improve your chances of being one of the lucky few.

Alex Miller, CEO and founder of air travel website Upgraded Points says travelers often need to use their points or obtain elite status to get a free upgrade.

"However, there are still some occasional freebies given out, mostly one of two types: Operational upgrades and non-revenue upgrades," he tells ConsumerAffairs.

The average air traveler has little chance of getting a non-revenue upgrade since they are doled out to off-duty airline employees, designated family members of employees, and people who work for partner airlines.

Operational upgrades

A typical traveler will most often be offered an operational upgrade. Sometimes coach is oversold, and rather than bump a passenger for a flight, they'll upgrade a coach passenger if there are empty seats in business or first class.

The trick is to be the one the airline selects for the upgrade. Miller says there are a few things that can help your case.

The first may sound obvious but Miller says it is often overlooked. Ask nicely. If coach appears to be booked to capacity, suggest to a flight attendant that if they're going to upgrade someone to first class, you'd like to throw your hat in the ring. Don't forget to smile and turn on the charm when you ask.

'Well dressed and professional looking'

Second, dress like you belong in first class. Flying coach has become less and less comfortable over the years as passenger space has shrunk. While that might require wearing comfortable clothing on a long flight, Miller says if you're dressed like you're headed for the gym, you are unlikely to be picked to move up to first class.

"Because there's no objective way to choose someone, the pilots and flight attendants usually look for someone well-dressed and professional looking," Miller said. "The main idea is they're choosing someone who both makes a good impression on the staff and also sets a good impression of the airline as a representative of the airline's customers."

Being a member of the airline's loyalty program may also help your case. These passengers are considered "elite" flyers, with status rising to different tiers depending on how much they fly and spend with the airline.

"The higher the tier, the higher your priority is for an upgrade," Miller said. "Then the airline works down the list until the business/first class cabin is full."

Miller says upgrades are harder to come by these days because airlines have done a very good job of managing their reservations, pricing seats, and filling cabins. An operational upgrade is only going to happen when the airline has miscalculated and must give some lucky passenger a treat in order to seat as many passengers as possible.

Getting an upgrade from coach to business or first class is not as common as it once was, but air travel experts say it still happens. Understanding how th...

Article Image

How new airline boarding procedures could curb the spread of diseases

When major disease epidemics strike, airlines are often forced to shut down travel between countries to stop outbreaks from spreading. But a recent study by Florida State University (FSU) researchers shows that changing boarding procedures could drastically reduce transmissions rates.

Ashok Srinivasan, a computer science associate professor, and his team found that the current zoned boarding procedures used by many airlines plays a major role in the spread of disease. To fix the problem, Srinivasan suggests sacrificing some efficiency to reduce clustered contact between passengers.

"There's been a lot of boarding and deplaning research framed in terms of speed and efficiency, but we aren't looking for efficiency. We're looking to decrease the spread of disease," he said. "It turns out that procedures that are generally good at getting people onto a plane very fast are also very bad at preventing infection."

Reducing spread of infection

Using sophisticated computer simulations and algorithms, the researchers analyzed how airline travel procedures affected the spread of infection for major diseases. They found that deplaning tended to be much less dangerous than boarding because passengers weren’t forced to congregate in large groups.

"While deplaning is a fairly fast and efficient process in terms of avoiding the spread of infection, our model shows that boarding the plane is the big problem. When you have many zones, people in the same zone tend to come very close to each other, close enough to easily transmit infections," said Srinivasan.

So, how can we avoid spreading diseases during the boarding process? The researchers suggest that airlines adopt a two-zone system that divides the plane lengthwise and lets passengers board randomly. Doing so, they say, would help reduce the amount of time that travelers are in contact with each other and cut transmission rates.

Worth the wait

In a model of the system, the researchers found that the probability of an Ebola outbreak spreading to 20 new people per month was reduced from 67% under the currently used system to 13% under the suggested system.

"When you have passengers board randomly, people are less likely to spend extended periods of time close to each other," Srinivasan said. "On the whole, random boarding does take longer, but if passengers had to choose between getting Ebola and being seated a few minutes later, we suspect they'd prefer the latter."

"When outbreaks occur, there are often calls for wholesale flight cancellations, but this can harm countries that are already reeling under the onslaught of an epidemic," he continued. "Our research provides insight on the tradeoffs involved in the different policy options. Decision makers need to consider which policies are best, the practical steps that need to be taken and which tradeoffs they're willing to make."

The full study has been published in Physical Review.

When major disease epidemics strike, airlines are often forced to shut down travel between countries to stop outbreaks from spreading. But a recent study b...

Article Image

Southwest airlifts stranded passengers out of Houston

Folks are stranded all over Texas as flood waters from Hurricane Harvey continue to rise. Many are in their homes, others in emergency shelters, and more than a few are at airports closed by the horrific storm.

Southwest Airlines gave an unexpected lift to about 500 stranded travelers at Houston Hobby Sunday. The airport was officially closed because it was without power but Southwest rolled out five 737s, loaded 'em up and headed out, dropping the grateful travelers in Dallas.

The airlift was carried out quickly, since the flights had to depart before sundown, there being no runway lights. There was no other traffic in the area since the airport was closed, so the pilots used what's called VFR -- visual flight rules, also known as see and be seen. It's also called looking out the window.

While it may sound unorthodox, the flights were perfectly legal and safe and had been given Federal Aviation Administration approval. 

Folks are stranded all over Texas as flood waters from Hurricane Harvey continue to rise. Many are in their homes, others in emergency shelters, and more t...

Article Image

Five annoying things about air travel, and how to overcome them

Air travel isn't what it used to be. For one, it's a lot safer. For another, it can be a lot more annoying.

The folks at Brandpoint surveyed a group of frequent flyers and came up with five major annoyances of modern air travel, along with suggestions for overcoming them.

Noisy passengers

If you're lucky, there isn't a crying baby within 12 rows of you. Even so, being on a crowded airplane can tax the auditory senses.

The solution? A pair of noise-canceling headphones will dampen the surrounding sounds, help you focus on your work, more closely follow the plot of the movie you're watching, or even catch 40 winks. Best of all, they may discourage a chatty seatmate from trying to engage you in annoying conversation.

Seat kickers

After a screaming baby in the seat behind you, probably nothing is worse than a child who constantly kicks the back of your seat. It's made more jarring because you can't see the little seat-kicker and don't know when the next jolt is coming.

Instead of taking your frustration out on the kid and his parents, travel pros suggest staying calm and asking the child's parents if they could help him avoid kicking your seat. Suggest putting a carry-on under the child's feet to create a foot rest. Be empathetic with the parents, not confrontational.

Flight delays

Sometimes the annoyances begin before you even board the aircraft. When you get the bad news that your flight will be delayed, just be glad you aren't already on board and sitting on the tarmac for a couple of extra hours.

When faced with a delay, treat yourself to a cold beverage in an airport lounge, or grab one of those massage chairs on the concourse. Remember, it could be worse.

Terrible Wi-Fi service

Comedian Louis C.K. does a funny bit about an air traveler whining about the slow and unreliable internet speed on board the aircraft.

"He's complaining about something he didn't know existed just 10 seconds ago," the comedian quipped on the Conan O'Brien Show.

While it's true that airborne Wi-Fi can face some technical limitations now and then, the travel pros suggest downloading plenty of entertainment content on your laptop before you leave the ground.

Cabin air

Climate control can sometimes be an issue aboard an airliner, particularly when you're parked on the tarmac for a while. Brandpoint says airline air filtration systems are in the process of being upgraded, and are much improved.

To increase comfort travel pros suggest selecting wardrobe carefully, wearing moisture-wicking active wear to keep things breathable in a warm environment.

Air travel isn't what it used to be. For one, it's a lot safer. For another, it can be a lot more annoying.The folks at Brandpoint surveyed a group of...

Article Image

'Air rage' incidents might not be as common as you think

"Air rage" is a recently-coined term for people on airliners who go a little crazy, cause a disturbance, and sometimes pose a threat to other passengers and crew members. It seems each week brings another story about it.

Just last week a passenger aboard a Spirit Airlines flight reportedly stripped naked during the boarding process. This was before the flight had even left the ground. In another case, a young passenger reportedly tried to open the emergency door once the plane touched down.

Previously, there have been numerous reports of passengers and members of the flight crew getting into altercations, some of which have been recorded on smartphones and distributed for all to see. So it might be understandable to assume that the situation aboard commercial airliners is getting worse.

'Unruly passenger' statistics

However, that might not be the case. It turns out the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) keeps statistics on "unruly passenger" reports, with data going back to 1995. An analysis of the numbers suggests that the air rage factor isn't something new.

In 1995 the FAA reported 146 such incidents, which increased to a high of 310 in 2004 -- an increase of 112% in nine years.

But since 2004, the number of unruly passenger reports has been on the decline. The FAA records show there were 205 in 2005, 137 in 2006, and only 97 last year. Since 2004, the number of incidents has averaged 143, three less than in 1995, the year the FAA began keeping records.

To make it into the official records, an unruly passenger incident has to be reported to the FAA, and reporting is at the discretion of the flight crew. To qualify as an incident, it must interfere with the duties of a flight crewmember.

It may seem like there are more of these incidents because now, each one seems to be reported on social media, sometimes with accompanying video that can reach millions of people.

Being an "unruly" passenger can be costly. Since 2000, the FAA has been able to fine individuals $25,000 per violation, with one incident sometimes resulting in multiple violations.

"Air rage" is a recently-coined term for people on airliners who go a little crazy, cause a disturbance, and sometimes pose a threat to other passengers an...

Article Image

Court orders regulators to study airline seat size

As many regular airline passengers have no doubt noticed, seating space in coach has gotten smaller over the years.

Not only have carriers improved efficiency and profits by selling more tickets on each flight, they have added seating to accommodate more passengers, while reducing the space for that seating. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has now been ordered to consider whether airlines have jeopardized safety.

The case stems from a petition filed with the FAA by the consumer group Flyers Rights. It asked the FAA to consider rulemaking to expand passenger seating areas as a health and safety issue. The FAA declined to do so.

Flyers Rights then took its case to court, seeking to force the agency to act. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia ruled that the FAA was wrong in denying the petition and ordered the FAA consider the consumer group's request.

Incredible shrinking airline seat

“This is the Case of the Incredible Shrinking Airline Seat,” Circuit Judge Patricia A. Millett wrote in the majority opinion. “As many have no doubt noticed, aircraft seats and the spacing between them have been getting smaller and smaller, while American passengers have been growing in size.”

The ruling found that the FAA had no “reasonable basis” for refusing to consider airline seat size and passenger space. It found the agency relied on studies that were either irrelevant, outdated, or not included in the record or under seal.

Flyers Rights say it filed its petition with the FAA back in 2015, asking that it place a moratorium on shrinking seat sizes, while creating a standard that all airline seats must meet. The group argued the lack of a standard posed a safety threat in the event of an emergency evacuation.

“The FAA has not conducted, or alternatively has not released, any tests, whether computer simulations or rehearsed evacuations, that demonstrate that planes with modern seat sizes and modern passenger sizes would pass emergency evacuation criteria,” the group said in a statement.

An inch and a half narrower

In its petition, Flyers Rights argued that the average airline seat pitch, the distance between the backs of the seats, had gone from 35 inches to 31 inches in the last decade, while the seat width had declined an inch and a half, to 17 inches. The group said the cramped conditions made it more difficult for passengers to get off the aircraft quickly in the event of an emergency.

The FAA denied the group's petition last year, citing studies that showed the space between passengers was not important in an emergency evacuation.

If the FAA eventually sets seating standards for commercial aircraft, it could be the most significant government airline action since the industry was deregulated in 1979. Until that time, the FAA set fares for all flights and determined what routes an airline could fly.

Since all airlines had to charge the same fare, the only way an airline had of setting itself apart from competitors was improving comfort and service to its customers.

As many regular airline passengers have no doubt noticed, seating space in coach has gotten smaller over the years.Not only have carriers improved effi...

Article Image

Delta experimenting with changes to boarding process

To meet the challenges of airport congestion and to improve passengers' boarding experience, Delta Airlines says it is experimenting with a new approach at its Atlanta hub.

Delta says the changes are designed to streamline the boarding process and will get a tryout at three gates on the T Concourse at Atlanta's Hartsfield Jackson Airport.

First, the check-in counters are getting smaller. Mobile agent pods will have a smaller footprint than traditional gate counters, which Delta believes will open up space and make the boarding area feel less crowded.

Agents will also get out from behind the counter. Using handheld devices, ticket agents will be able to move through the crowd to make seat changes, check bag status, and do other tasks that normally are performed behind the counter, with passengers waiting in a line for help.

Boarding pillars

Delta is also setting up what it calls “boarding pillars,” creating four lanes where passengers will line up. The purpose is to improve organization, improve traffic flow, and give passengers a clear path to boarding their flight.

The airline is also experimenting with what it calls “E-Gates,” allowing passengers to self-board just by scanning their boarding pass or smartphone.

These changes make up phase one of the pilot project, with phase two increasing agent mobility at the gate and integrating biometric boarding, which is currently being tested at Washington, D.C.'s Reagan National Airport.

“Developing and testing these innovations is an important part of our ongoing effort to improve the gate and boarding process for our customers,” said Gil West, Delta's chief operating officer.

West says the airline also believes service will improve because it removes a barrier between ticket agent and passengers.

Whether these changes are expanded to other airports Delta serves will depend on an evaluation at the end of the pilot project. In the last year, Delta says it has replaced ID checks with fingerprint scanning, instituted a biometric-based self-service bag drop and other enhancements to better track luggage.

To meet the challenges of airport congestion and to improve passengers' boarding experience, Delta Airlines says it is experimenting with a new approach at...

Article Image

Feds fine three airlines for violating consumer protection rules

The feds have relieved three airlines -- American, Delta, and Frontier --  of $850,000 for violating various consumer protection rules. 

The U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) fined Frontier Airlines $400,000 for violating oversales and disability rules, American Airlines $250,000 for failing to make timely refunds to passengers, and Delta Air Lines $200,000 for filing inaccurate baggage reports. 

In the announcement late Friday, the DOT found that Frontier failed to seek volunteers before bumping passengers involuntarily, failed to provide bumped passengers the required written notice describing their rights, and failed to provide proper compensation to passengers in a timely manner, in violation of DOT rules. 

In addition, Frontier failed to provide passengers with a disability prompt and adequate wheelchair assistance in enplaning and deplaning aircraft and moving within the terminal, and did not adequately respond to complaints filed by passengers with disabilities. 

The Department found that American failed to process refund requests in a timely manner, in violation of DOT rules. 

Delta was fined for underreporting to the Department the number of mishandled baggage reports it received from passengers. The underreporting made Delta’s ranking in the Department’s Air Travel Consumer Report seem better than it was at various times.

The feds have relieved three airlines -- American, Delta, and Frontier --  of $850,000 for violating various consumer protection rules. The U.S. Depart...

Article Image

Look out, Airbnb, Google is watching

Airbnb has had a pretty good thing going for quite a while. Like Uber and other peer-to-peer connectors, it has made scads of money simply connecting people with other people -- namely, those with spare rooms and apartments and travelers looking for something cheaper or homier than a hotel room.

One problem with being successful, of course, is that you attract competitors large and small. There've been reports that other travel groups like Expedia and Priceline are looking to expand their share of the vacation rentals business, but perhaps the most ominous development involves Google, the ultimate disrupter.

A recent report by the travel site Skift finds Google running comparison shopping searches for peer-to-peer rentals in Europe, in popular destinations like Rome, Venice, and Frankfurt. The listings appear when you click "Accomodation Type." There didn't appear to be any listings from Airbnb, TripAdvisor, or other established peer-to-peer sites. 

Google has not commented on what it's doing, but Skift notes that Google has conducted similar public but unannounced tests prior to barging into other markets. 

Other players expanding

Add to that the formidable players Expedia and Priceline. Both may have been feeling a bit pinched lately by the growing popularity of peer-to-peer rentals, which now account for as much as one-fifth of the short-term rental market.

Expedia flexed its muscles in 2015 when it bought HomeAway, picking up about 1.4 million listings that it is now displaying on Expedia and Hotels.com. Priceline has added more than 600,000 listings, according to a report in the Wall Street Journal. 

“It’s not so much that people have changed. I believe technology has enabled this type of rental property to be so much easier for people to find,” Priceline CEO Glenn Fogel told the Journal. 

Google aside, the vacation rentals business faces increasing pressure from cities and grass roots neighborhood groups who say the short-term rentals attract strangers in what are normally quiet neighborhoods and buildings. Cities from New York to California have passed ordinances and homeowners associations have imposed rules restricting the rentals.

One condominium association in Palm Springs, Calif., now imposes a $1,500 fine for any homeowner found to have rented a unit for less than a month. Fines for subsequent violations rise quickly. Residents had complained about noise and trash left by renters who blew into town to attend Coachella and the many other festivals staged in and around the desert resort city.

Airbnb has had a pretty good thing going for quite a while. Like Uber and other peer-to-peer connectors, it has made scads of money simply connecting peopl...

Article Image

British Airways faces strike as summer travel season begins

British Airway’s cabin crews are welcoming the start of the summer travel season with a 16-day strike that starts Saturday, affecting thousands of flights from and to Heathrow Airport from July 1 through Sunday, July 16.

It comes after a difficult time for the airline, which endured a catastrophic IT system failure over the bank holiday weekend at the end of May. 

The strike will affect about one-third of BA's flights originating and terminating at Heathrow. It will ground long-haul flights, but most short-haul routes will be unaffected.

Bott & Co., a law firm, estimates that 400,000 passengers may be affected over the full 16-day strike period.

“If a passenger’s flight is cancelled or delayed for more than 3 hours then they are entitled to between €250 and €600 compensation, unless the disruption was caused by extraordinary circumstances," said Coby Benson, Flight Delay Solicitor at Bott & Co.

“The law says that circumstances are only extraordinary if they are beyond the airline’s control or due to events that are ‘not inherent’ in the day-to-day activity of an airline. In our opinion this is not extraordinary since the events are well within British Airways’ control and the management of disgruntled staff is simply part and parcel of running any business, not least an airline."

Passenger rights

Not surprisingly, British laws regarding compensation differ from those in the U.S. Passengers whose flights are cancelled and who abandon their travel plans may be entitled to compensation as well as a refund, Bott & Co. said in an online guide for passengers. 

If a flight is delayed for more than five hours rather than cancelled and the passenger abandons their travel, then they are only entitled to claim a refund on the ticket.

If the time affected reaches three or more hours, passengers can then look to make a claim for flight delay compensation for the loss of their time and the inconvenience caused, Bott said in a section dealing with delays. 

British Airway’s cabin crews are welcoming the start of the summer travel season with a 16-day strike that starts Saturday, affecting thousands of flights...

Article Image

Passenger group warns against privatizing air traffic control

A group representing airline passengers is warning that a proposal to privatize the nation's air traffic control system won't turn out well for consumers.

FlyersRights.org expressed concern as top executives of the airline industry headed to the White House Monday to discuss the plan.

Currently, air traffic controllers are under the direction of the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). But Paul Hudson, president of the consumer group and member of the FAA Aviation Rulemaking Advisory Committee, said the plan under consideration essentially turns the system over to the airlines.

He's concerned that putting such a system in place would lead to new fees and taxes for passengers to pay. Kate Hanni, FlyersRights.org founder, is also dismayed.

'Political handout'

"This unfortunately provides another political handout to a highly-concentrated industry with a terrible track record of leaving passengers on the tarmac for hours without food and water, cramming paying customers into inhumane seats, and verbally and physically assaulting them all while charging for everything under the sun," Hanni said.

FlyersRights.org lists several reasons it says the air traffic control system should not be turned over to an airline-controlled entity.

First, it says the FAA has been working on upgrades to the air traffic control system and should have it completed by 2020. The airlines, the group charges, have been holding things up by not installing the necessary equipment on aircraft.

Second, privatizing the system would likely disrupt that modernization effort, remove Congressional oversight, and create a monopoly that has the power to tax consumers.

Finally, the group says other nations that have tried to privatize their air traffic control systems have usually encountered problems, requiring taxpayers to step in and bail out the private entity.

'Least-capable industry'

In a statement, FlyersRights.org calls the airlines "the least-capable industry" to run air traffic control, pointing to recent computer outages and customer relations meltdowns. It claims airline problems, including broken planes and tardy flight crews, are responsible for most of the delays in the system.

But after meeting with airline executives Monday, President Trump left little doubt that he supports the plan to remove air traffic control from the FAA's jurisdiction.

Trump said a private system would reduce wait times, increase route efficiency, and eliminate many delays.

A group representing airline passengers is warning that a proposal to privatize the nation's air traffic control system won't turn out well for consumers....

Article Image

Delta latest airline to face consumer lawsuit

For the airlines, the world changed on April 9, 2017.

That's when United Airlines summoned Chicago airport police to forcibly remove a passenger on a Louisville bound flight after he refused to give up his seat to a United employee. Video of the incident was recorded by numerous passengers, sparking world-wide outrage.

Since then airlines have been subjected to intense scrutiny by passengers, fed up with the often unpleasant rigors of today's commercial air travel. Every encounter, it seems, is now recorded on smartphones and Tweeted around the world.

Though not every incident ends up in court, some do. The latest is a complaint filed against Delta Airlines by a passenger who says he was assaulted by members of a Delta flight crew during a flight from Atlanta to Palm Springs, Calif., two years ago.

Alleges assault and battery

Courthouse News, which obtained a copy of the complaint, reports Atef Bandary is seeking damages for assault and battery, emotional distress, and charges the airline with negligence. According to the 14-page document, this is what Bandary alleges:

During the flight, he says he asked a flight attendant for some water and a light snack, because he needed to take medication that required it to be taken with food. Bandary said the request was denied.

Bandary, who says he is HIV positive, took the medication without food and says that caused a case of diarrhea. He says when he got up to go to the lavatory, a flight attendant ordered him to sit down. He says he explained the situation -- including the fact that he is HIV positive -- to no avail.

Forcibly restrained

When he insisted he must use the toilet, he says the flight attendant notified the captain, who enlisted a fellow passenger who was a law enforcement officer, to forcibly restrain him, in the process injuring his shoulder.

Adding insult to injury, he says during the altercation his pants fell down around his ankles and, despite his pleas, those subduing him refused to pull up his pants.

Delta later pressed charges against Bandary and he was indicted on criminal charges of interfering with a flight crew member. After hiring a lawyer, he says the jury acquitted him.

In his suit against the airline, Bandary also charges the airline targeted him because he is a naturalized citizen, is gay, and because he had complained about the service on the flight.

Bandary does not specify the monetary damages he seeks. Rather, he says he wants the court to determine the amount, should it find in his favor.

File photoFor the airlines, the world changed on April 9, 2017.That's when United Airlines summoned Chicago airport police to forcibly remove a p...

Article Image

Delta airlines testing facial recognition technology

Airlines are under increasing pressure to do something -- anything -- to improve the customer experience. Delta says it may have a way to do that.

The airline said it will test facial recognition technology at Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport this summer. The technology will be employed at four self-serve bag drops, allowing passengers to check their bags themselves.

One of the stations, for international travelers, will be equipped with the facial recognition technology, matching passengers with their passport photos.

"We expect this investment and new process to save customers time," said Gareth Joyce, a senior vice president at Delta. "And, since customers can operate the biometric-based bag drop machine independently, we see a future where Delta agents will be freed up to seek out travelers and deliver more proactive and thoughtful customer service."

Increasingly automated

Airports are becoming increasingly automated, and Delta sees this as just the next, natural step in that process. Previously, the airline began attaching radio frequency identification technology (RFID)tags to luggage, to keep better track of it.

"We're making travel easier than ever for our customers and continuing to deliver a leading customer experience," Joyce said.

The effort comes at a time when airlines are under pressure from passengers and policymakers. After the forcible removal of a passenger from a United Airlines flight April 9, almost every instance of passenger angst aboard a commercial aircraft is recorded and spread across social media.

For its part, Delta said it will collect passenger feedback during the Minnesota trial and run process analyses to make sure this addition of technology not only saves the airline money, but improves the overall customer experience.

Delta says it believes it will. It cites studies it says show that self-service bag drops have the potential to process twice as many customers per hour.

Airlines are under increasing pressure to do something -- anything -- to improve the customer experience. Delta says it may have a way to do that.The a...

Article Image

Family speaks out about being tossed from Delta flight

During the same week that airline executives appeared before Congress to endure lectures about the state of their customer service, a family has come forward saying it was thrown off a Delta flight for refusing to give up one of the seats they had purchased.

The incident, recorded on video as most are now days, occurred April 23, two weeks after a Kentucky physician was dragged off a United Airlines flight in Chicago. The family only came forward with its story this week.

Brian and Brittany Schear, of Huntington Beach, Calif., were returning home after a vacation in Hawaii. Initially, the couple said, they purchased tickets for themselves and their teenage son, and planned to hold their young children, ages one and two, on their laps on the long flight.

Before departure, the couple told NBC News, they purchased a ticket on another flight for their oldest son and planned to use the third seat for their two-year-old. The Schears said they gave that information to the Delta gate attendant, who told them it would be okay.

Overbooked

But the flight was oversold. Once the Schears were aboard, an airline official told them the Delta was reclaiming the third seat the Schears had purchased. A lengthy argument ensued, with the Schears threatened with arrest if they did not comply. When they refused they were removed from the flight. It was late at night and the Schears said they were left to find their own hotel and purchase new tickets to get home. The video of the encounter is below:

Technically, Delta might have had the right to reclaim the seat since the person to whom the ticket was initially issued (the Schears' teen-aged son) failed to show up. The Shears said they paid for it and had someone else that could use it and didn't understand why it was being taken away from them.

But being technically correct may not be enough in this day and age, especially as anger at airlines seems to be building. Delta issued a statement saying the company is sorry for "the unfortunate experience our customers had with Delta." The airline said it plans to refund the family's travel and provide "additional compensation."

Received conflicting messages

Consumers rate Delta Air Lines

The Schears were especially upset because they say a Delta gate attendant told them their two-year-old son could sit in the unused seat. But when it became apparent the flight was overbooked, Delta enforced the letter of its policy, which required the person to whom the ticket was issued sit in the seat.

Since United found itself in an uncomfortable spotlight last month, it's apparent that these types of things are not all that uncommon. Now, however, when they happen we'll all going to hear about it.

United has announced a number of policy changes in the wake of the dragging incident that it hopes will improve customer service. One provision gives airline personnel on the ground the power to make decisions "in the moment" if they will improve the customer experience.

At a time when airlines are selling every seat on a plane, and then some, that might not be a bad idea for United's competitors to consider too.

During the same week that airline executives appeared before Congress to endure lectures about the state of their customer service, a family has come forwa...

Article Image

American Airlines plans to jam a few more passengers into its newest jets

It's only been a day since members of Congress reamed airline executives and demanded to know why they "hate the American people." Now a report says American Airlines is planning to jam even more seats into its newest airplane model, the Boeing 737 Max. 

CNN Money reports that American will cram in an additional row of seats into the new airplanes, increasing capacity by six passengers by shrinking the distance between seats from 31 inches to 29 in three rows. Other rows will shrink to 30 inches.

You might think that the new, even more cramped seats will be ultra-cheap but no, they'll cost the same as other economy seats. 

Squeezing in travelers

As if to ensure maximum discomfort at all times, American is also shrinking the size of the bathrooms. thereby adding room for another four passengers. If you're keeping count, that's ten more passengers stuffed into each of the new planes.

The CNN report said United is considering a similar squeeze play, but the carrier, still smarting from its passenger-dragging episode, wouldn't confirm that report.

The incredible shrinking seat ploy would, at best, put American and the other "legacy" carriers on a par with budget carriers. Actually, some budget carriers provide more leg room than their older competitors. JetBlue, Southwest, and Alaska all fall into the 31″ to 33″ range.

It's only been a day since members of Congress reamed airline executives and demanded to know why they "hate the American people." Now a report says Americ...

Article Image

In Congress, airline reform may be a bipartisan issue

Airline executives discovered an uncomfortable truth when they appeared Tuesday before a House committee in Washington.

Republicans and Democrats in Washington may not agree on much, but they both hate the airlines with equal passion. The hearing, called in the wake of United's use of force to remove a passenger from one of its planes, gave lawmakers a platform to vent their anger.

"Members of Congress fly a lot," said committee chairman Rep. Bud Shuster (R-Pa.) "So do many of our constituents, the people in this room, and those watching online. We’ve all been in a situation where we just want to get to our seat, get in the air, and get home as quickly as possible."

"But imagine, almost seven hours into a long travel day, you get physically ripped out of the seat that you paid for, and thrown off the plane. Or imagine, while single-handedly trying to get your infant children on a flight, an attendant yanks your stroller away, nearly hits your baby with it, then almost come to blows with another passenger who stands up for you."

Regulations at the ready

Democrats, meanwhile, have been busy drafting proposed regulations that would mandate certain service standards and punish airlines if they fail to meet them. And while GOP lawmakers generally loath any kind of new regulation, Democrats warned the assembled airline executives that on this, they just might make an exception.

Shuster told The Hill that he went into the hearings with an open mind, hoping to gain insight into what Congress should do, if anything, to try to make flying a little more pleasant. The committee is working on a major aviation bill, and Shuster made clear he's willing to consider customer service components of it, if necessary.

Overbooking

Much of the hearing focused on the practice of overbooking flights, requiring one or more passengers to be bumped from the flight if everyone who purchased a ticket shows up. Airlines overbook because in practice, there are usually some no-shows. These days, the airlines do not like to fly with empty seats.

But that's just one aspect of flying that consumers have come to despise, especially the consumers who also happen to be members of Congress, who go back to their districts each week -- almost all of them aboard a commercial airliner.

"This Committee and the Congress do not want half-measures or temporary fixes," Shuster warned the airline executives. "This issue is not going away. We are not going away, we will hold you accountable, and we expect real results."

Airline executives discovered an uncomfortable truth when they appeared Tuesday before a House committee in Washington.Republicans and Democrats in Was...

Article Image

Southwest vows to end overbooking by June, United says Dao's selection wasn't random

United Airlines is setting an example for the rest of the industry, though perhaps not quite in the way it would have chosen. United's unceremonious dragging of a passenger down the aisle and out the door to make room for a non-paying crew member has inspired other airlines to be a bit more careful before laying hands on their customers and to reduce overbooking.

​Southwest joined the TLC movement today, saying that by the end of June it will eliminate overselling of seats. CEO Gary Kelly said it is actually not a big problem and claimed he seldom hears complaints about it, but vowed to root it out anyway.

JetBlue says it already avoids selling more seats than it actually has but other airlines have been a bit less forthcoming with regard to their practices.

United said today that it would "reduce" but not eliminate overbooking. 

Suit settled, United objects to use of "random"

United today reportedly settled the lawsuit brought by Dr. David Dao, the Kentucky physician thrown off a flight from Chicago to Louisville. The suit named both United and the City of Chicago. Terms of the settlement were not available.

Tom Demetrio, an attorney for Dr. Dao, said in a statement that he hopes “all other airlines make similar changes and follow United’s lead in helping to improve the passenger flying experience with an emphasis on empathy, patience, respect and dignity,” the Wall Street Journal reported. 

United meanwhile, objected to a ConsumerAffairs report earlier today in which we referred to Dr. Dao having been picked "at random" by a computer for expulsion from his flight.

 "It is not accurate to say 'a computer picked Dao at random and airline personnel told him he was being involuntarily bumped,'" United spokeswoman Erin Benson said in an email. "When no customer accepted the offer, 'The agent then followed the involuntary denial of boarding selection process to determine which customers would be asked to leave the plane.' While 'automated,' this process is not random."

We asked Benson to clarify and to specify what criteria were used to pick Dr. Dao if in fact the process was not random. She responded:

United's involuntary denied boarding (IDB) process is automated and customers are not subject to discretionary choice by agents. This is our process:

  • First, agents will deny boarding if a passenger does not have a seat assignment prior to boarding the aircraft.
  • Customers are then sorted by fare class (estimated fare paid) and type of itinerary.
  • Customers with the lowest paid fare are placed at the top of the list for involuntary denial of boarding.
  • If a group of customers paid the same fare, then the group is sorted by time of check-in.
  • Customers with frequent flyer status will not be involuntarily denied boarding, unless all of the remaining passengers have frequent flyer status, in which case the lowest status will move to the top of the IDB list.
  • Customers with special needs (unaccompanied minors, passengers with disabilities) are excluded and are not involuntarily denied boarding.

United Airlines is setting an example for the rest of the industry, though perhaps not quite in the way it would have chosen. United's unceremonious draggi...

Article Image

American suspends flight attendant after alleged hitting incident

Just two weeks after United Airlines set off a social media firestorm by forcibly removing a passenger from a flight, American Airlines finds itself in damage control mode as well.

According to several passengers who were in the process of boarding American Airlines Flight 591 at San Francisco, a male flight attendant grabbed a stroller from a female passenger who was in the process of boarding, while holding her small child.

According to witnesses, the flight attendant then hit the woman in the head with the stroller. There is no video of this alleged incident, but several passengers whipped out smartphones and started filming the aftermath.

The passenger, reportedly traveling from Argentina, can be seen and heard crying, asking that the stroller be returned to her. When an angry fellow passenger gets out of his seat to confront the flight attendant, a fight between the two nearly ensues.

Perhaps taking a lesson from the United debacle, American Airlines removed the flight attendant from duty and announced it had begun an investigation to determine what happened aboard the aircraft.

American statement

“What we see on this video does not reflect our values or how we care for our customers,” American said in a statement. “We are deeply sorry for the pain we have caused this passenger and her family and to any other customers affected by the incident. We are making sure all of her family's needs are being met while she is in our care.”

American said it put the passenger on another flight and upgraded her and her family to first class for the rest of the trip.

Even though the video does not show the alleged encounter, the aftermath was apparently disturbing enough to executives in the C-suite at American.

“The actions of our team member captured here do not appear to reflect patience or empathy, two values necessary for customer care,” American said in its statement. In short, we are disappointed by these actions.”

Surain Adyanthaya, who filmed the aftermath, told the London Daily Mail it appeared to him that the woman was “involuntarily removed” from the plane while the flight attendant stayed aboard.

Two weeks ago a Kentucky physician, Dr. David Dao, was dragged off of a United Express Jet flight from Chicago to Louisville after he refused to give up his seat to a United Employee.

Just two weeks after United Airlines set off a social media firestorm by forcibly removing a passenger from a flight, American Airlines finds itself in dam...

Article Image

Emirates cuts back flights to five American cities

Emirates, hit hard by President Trump's ban on using electronics on U.S.-bound flights, is cutting its schedule to five American cities because of "significant deterioration" in bookings, the airline said.

The cutbacks affect flights to Fort Lauderdale, Orlando, Boston, Seattle, and Los Angeles.

“Over the past three months, we have seen a significant deterioration in the booking profiles on all our U.S. routes, across travel segments,” the airline said in a prepared statement. “Emirates has therefore responded as any profit-oriented enterprise would, and we will redeploy capacity to serve demand on other routes on our global network.”

The surprise March 25 order by the Trump Administration applied to non-stop flights to the U.S. from Dubai and other Middle Eastern points. It was said to be an anti-terrorism measure, but critics said it was part of Trump's effort to crack down on immigration.

Nothing to do

The order banned laptops, smartphones, e-readers, and other electronic devices on flights from the Middle East, in effect transporting business travelers back to the bad old days when there was nothing to do in flight but read and watch whatever entertainment the airline offers.

Emirates responded by offering to loan Microsoft Surface tablets to travelers in First and Business classes. It offered all passengers a "laptop and tablet handling service" that let them use their devices until they actually boarded the aircraft and returned them immediately upon landing.

In April, TripAdvisor had named Emirates the world's overall best airline. It also took honors for Best First Class and Best Economy Class.

The ban was limited to flights departing 10 airports from the Middle East and North Africa and was said to be based on security concerns. Officials told The Washington Post that intelligence continues to pick up on terrorist interest in targeting commercial aviation. The concern is that electronic devices can be modified to contain explosives.

Besides the ban on electronics, Emirates and other international carriers have been hampered by Trump's executive order blocking the entry of nationals from several Muslim-majority countries. The orders were blocked by U.S. courts but only after days of chaotic scenes at airports around the world. 

Emirates said the end result is that there is less interest in traveling to the U.S. 

“The recent actions taken by the U.S. government relating to the issuance of entry visas, heightened security vetting and restrictions on electronic devices in aircraft cabins have had a direct impact on consumer interest and demand for air travel into the U.S.,” the airline said, according to the Wall Street Journal. 

Emirates, hit hard by President Trump's ban on using electronics on U.S.-bound flights, is cutting its schedule to five American cities because of "signifi...

Article Image

Points or cash? When buying an airline ticket, it matters

You're planning a summer vacation trip and you've picked your destination. Now, you just need to book your flight.

You're probably looking for the lowest fare, the most convenient schedule, and the fewest stops. But you might give some thought to whether you'll buy your ticket outright or use your credit card points.

But wait, why should that be a consideration? Isn't it all the same? Not always.

Personal finance site NerdWallet set up a simulation, booking flights on 20 popular routes, paying cash for some and using points from loyalty programs for others.

Factors influencing value

It found point values differed depending on a variety of factors, including the distance of the flight and the class of the booking. It also found variations based on whether the ticket was one-way or round-trip.

For example, if you're flying to a destination within the U.S., the study found your points are worth more if you fly economy class. Points were worth an average of 1.03 to 1.08 cents each on round trips at the high end of the scale.

If you're using points to fly business class, you will find that your points are worth more on longer flights. In fact, there's quite a bit of difference between flights longer than 1,000 miles -- 1.13 cents as opposed to .72 cents.

Finally, your points are worth more on one-way flights than they are when you purchase a round-trip ticket.

More value on one-way flights

One-way flights usually cost more than flying round-trip, but not when you're paying with points. It might be important if you need the flexibility of one-way scheduling. Usually it would cost more, but when you pay with points it doesn't.

That said, consumers traveling within the U.S. this summer will get the most bang from their airline points if they fly economy and book a round-trip ticket. The point value for those tickets range from 1.03 to 1.08 cents, slightly above the one cent average.

You don't get nearly as much out of your points if you use them for round-trip business or first class, since they average 0.83 to 0.86 cents. If you're flying business class this summer, NerdWallet suggests paying with cash, saving your points for a trip when they'll deliver more value.

You're planning a summer vacation trip and you've picked your destination. Now, you just need to book your flight.You're probably looking for the lowes...

Article Image

What to do if you are involuntarily bumped

The outrage directed against United Airlines' handling of Dr. David Dao, on a flight from Chicago to Louisville, has been building for nearly a week.

On Sunday, Dao refused to give up his seat to a United Airlines employee who needed to get to Louisville, and his attorney says he was severely injured when security personnel dragged him off the plane in front of dozens of smartphone-wielding passengers who recorded the incident and spread it around the world.

In a news conference Thursday, Dao's attorney Thomas Demetrio painted a picture of a callous and sometimes brutal airline industry, and truth be told many regular fliers would not disagree.

But moral outrage aside, it begs the question; just what exactly should you do if you find yourself in Dao's position someday, told by the airline that you must give up your seat? Would you refuse and resist as Dao did?

Bumping will continue

It is almost certain that no airline will ever again subject a passenger to what Dao endured, having learned from United's painful lesson. But make no mistake, airlines have not stopped involuntarily bumping passengers and probably won't, so it could happen to you in the future.

Should it happen, the law is pretty clear. The U.S. Department of Transportation requires the airline denying boarding to a ticketed passenger to give the passenger a written statement detailing his or her rights and the airline's criteria for selecting a passenger to bump.

There is no evidence this was done in the case of Dr. Dao and it isn't clear how many, if any, airlines do this. So as a first step, passengers being involuntarily bumped should politely ask for this document. It signals to the airline that you know your rights and perhaps they will move on to bump some other poor soul.

But if you are handed the document and are still told to get off the aircraft, do you risk physical injury if you refuse? Again, probably not, since airlines will undoubtedly have new procedures in place to prevent future horrific encounters.

Legal risks

But refusing might land you in legal trouble, because your rights aboard a ship or aircraft are not always the same as they are on terra firma. Specifically, the law grants special powers to captains.

The federal aviation regulations (Title 14) also specify that passengers must obey all orders given by the pilot in command. So this is where a passenger must be careful. Should the plane's captain be summoned and order you off the plane, your refusal could be considered “interfering with an airline crew,” a felony.

However, it's something of a gray area if the plane is still at the gate with the door open. Until the aircraft pushes back from the gate, the airline's ground agents may be considered in charge of the aircraft.

Prudence might dictate that you don't want to be the test case. It may be wiser to comply with the order, then seek legal redress once you are safely off the plane.

In some cases, but not all, the airline bumping you involuntarily will provide some compensation. However, Transportation Department rules say that if the airline can arrange alternate transportation and get you to your destination within an hour of the original arrival time, there is no requirement for compensation.

In Washington, bumping may become a hot topic. Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.) is asking the Transportation Department to do more to protect the rights of airline passengers. In a letter to the agency, he's asking that it investigate airline industry practices, including involuntary bumping of passengers.

The outrage directed against United Airlines' handling of Dr. David Dao, on a flight from Chicago to Louisville, has been building for nearly a week.On...

Article Image

United passenger's injuries were serious, attorney warns of legal action

Thomas Demetrio, attorney for Dr. David Dao, the United Airlines passenger forcibly removed from a flight Sunday, has laid out his case against the airline.

At a news conference in Chicago, Demetrio accused United, and airlines generally, of "bullying" their customers. But he said the case of his client, the subject of a video that by now may have been viewed by everyone in the world, goes beyond the pale.

Demetrio told assembled media representatives that the case is a simple one. He said the law requires that when any individual is removed from a commercial aircraft, it must be done so without "excessive force."

"When excessive force is used to remove someone from an aircraft, the carrier is responsible," Demetrio said.

Dao, a physican based in Louisville, refused to give up his seat on a United flight to Louisville after the airline, at the last moment, tried to make room for four United employees scheduled for flights the next day in Louisville. Dao, on the final leg of a flight from Los Angeles, refused to leave, saying he had to see patients the next day.

Worldwide outrage

The video of Dao being pulled from his seat and dragged down the aisle has sparked outrage around the world. Dao was released from a Chicago hospital last night after being treated from injuries stemming from the incident.

Demetrio says Dao suffered a confusion, a broken nose and two broken front teeth. He said his client will be required to undergo reconstructive surgery.

"Will there be a lawsuit?" Demetrio asked rhetorically. "Yeah, there probably will."

In his opening statement and question-and-answer period with reporters, Demetrio also made the case for changes within the airline industry, using the term "bullying" several times in describing United's treatment of its customers. He suggested there is something in the corporate culture of the nation's airlines that causes them to mistreat customers in search of higher profits.

And if United thought its PR nightmare could not get any worse, Demetrio revealed that Dao, as a child, was part of the Vietnamese "boat people" who fled the country after the fall of Saigon in leaky boats, seeking refuge in the U.S.

"Dr. Dao told me that as horrifying as that experience was, what happened to him on United was worse," Demetrio said.

Thomas Demetrio, attorney for Dr. David Dao, the United Airlines passenger forcibly removed from a flight Sunday, has laid out his case against the airline...

Article Image

What's the lesson from United's PR disaster?

When United Airlines forcibly removed a paying customer from its Chicago to Louisville flight Sunday, to make room for a United crew member, it set off a firestorm on social media.

There are no fewer than 10 videos of the encounter on YouTube, and the airline is in full damage control mode.

But here's a larger question: have airlines now lost their ability to involuntarily bump passengers from an oversold flight?

After all, consumers now know that if they don't want to be removed from a flight, all they have to do is refuse to budge and go limp, daring security personnel to drag them down the aisle as dozens of smartphones capture the video. What airline wants that?

Seth Kaplan, managing partner at Airline Weekly, says Sunday's PR disaster probably won't change the balance of power between airline and passenger, at least not that much.

Bumps usually happen in the gate area

"What almost never happens, but happened here, is the guy was already on board and in a seat," Kaplan told ConsumerAffairs. "If a passenger is involuntarily bumped, it's going to almost always happen in the gate area."

Kaplan says the United incident is unlikely to set a precedent because the way it happened is rare. He also says it is important to airlines that they retain the ability to oversell flights, then involuntarily bump passengers if there are not enough volunteers to wait for a later flight. It's just the way the system works.

Not all airlines overbook

"Their goal is to have a full flight, and because some people don't show up for flights, they overbook," Kaplan said. "But there are airlines that don't do it. JetBlue doesn't overbook its flights."

The lesson for airlines, he says, is to give a little more thought to how they handle a similar situation. It might actually have been cheaper in the long run for United to lease another aircraft to fly the single United crew member to Louisville.

"There are things in the world that are unavoidable," Kaplan said. "This was not one of them."

When United Airlines forcibly removed a paying customer from its Chicago to Louisville flight Sunday, to make room for a United crew member, it set off a f...

Article Image

What are the world's best airlines?

Travel site TripAdvisor.com has named what it considers the 10 best airlines in the world. Unless you do a lot of international travel, you might not get to enjoy most of them.

Coming out on top is Emirates, based in the United Arab Emirates (UAE). It's followed by Singapore Airlines, and then Brazil's Azul.

It's only in the fourth spot that a U.S.-based airline -- JetBlue -- makes an appearance. It's followed by Air New Zealand, Korean Air, Japan Airlines, and Thailand-based Thai Smile at number eight.

Alaska Airlines, the only other U.S.-based carrier to earn a spot on the list, is ninth and Garuda Indonesia rounds out the top 10.

Some airlines investing in improved service

"The airline industry is investing billions of dollars in new aircraft and service enhancements to differentiate the flying experience and these awards recognize the carriers offering the very best experiences and value to the traveling public," said Bryan Saltzburg, Senior Vice President and General Manager for TripAdvisor Flights.

In addition to the top 10 list, TripAdvisor rated airlines in different categories of service, such as first class, business class, premium economy and economy. The awards were based on an algorithm that analyzed airline reviews and ratings submitted by travelers worldwide over the last year.

Besides being named number one overall, Emirates took honors for Best First Class and Best Economy Class.

"The fact that the awards are a result of unbiased reviews and feedback speaks to our commitment to deliver a superior travel experience for our customers," said Sir Tim Clark, President, Emirates Airlines.

Russia's Aeroflot was awarded Best Business Class and Air New Zealand was named Best Premium Economy Class.

Special category for U.S. carriers

Since U.S. carriers were not overly represented on the list, TripAdvisor created a category for North American airlines. It named Delta the top major airline in the U.S.

When it comes to mid-size and low-cost North American carriers, it breaks down this way:

  1. JetBlue
  2. Alaska Airlines
  3. Southwest
  4. Virgin America
  5. Westjet (Canada)

Travel site TripAdvisor.com has named what it considers the 10 best airlines in the world. Unless you do a lot of international travel, you might not get t...

Article Image

United passenger dragged off flight, tweetstorm erupts

Delta had a problem getting back on schedule over the weekend, but United may have a bigger problem -- a widely viewed video that shows a passenger being dragged off an overbooked flight by security guards.

Consumers rate United Airlines

The incident happened at Chicago's O'Hare International Airport on a flight bound for Louisville, Ky. The flight was overbooked and when the airline was unable to find enough volunteers to give up their seats, it began ordering selected passengers off the plane.

One man refused to leave, saying he was a doctor and had to be at work at a hospital the next morning. Security personnel then boarded the flight and removed the man forcibly, dragging him down the aisle as other passengers screamed at them to stop.

The passenger, bleeding and disoriented, was eventually allowed back onto the airplane, which finally left the gate about two hours behind schedule.

Sorry about that ...

In a statement, United apologized for the overbooking but not for ripping the passenger from his seat, roughing him up, and dragging him down the aisle

"Flight 3411 from Chicago to Louisville was overbooked. After our team looked for volunteers, one customer refused to leave the aircraft voluntarily and law enforcement was asked to come to the gate. We apologize for the overbook situation. Further details on the removed customer should be directed to authorities," United said.

Numerous passengers posted videos of the incident on Twitter and a storm of angry comments erupted after the videos went viral.

The incident follows one a few weeks ago in which two teenagers wearing leggings were denied board by United. A similar tweetstorm erupted even though it turned out the teens were flying on employee passes, which require more formal dress and specifically prohibit leggings.

Delta had a problem getting back on schedule over the weekend, but United may have a bigger problem -- a widely viewed video that s...

Article Image

Virgin America to take the name of its new mate, Alaska

Well, you knew this was going to happen. Alaska Airlines has teased and tantalized Virgin America's loyal followers, saying it might let Virgin keep its name after the two were joined together as one. 

But it turns out that was just honeymoon talk. The kindly looking old fellow whose visage adorns Alaska's tails has turned grumpy and exercised the patriarch's prerogative. In other words, Virgin America will soon be no more. In its place will be a lot more Alaska Airlines planes, Alaska made clear this week.

"After months of research and in-depth conversations with fliers, we’ve made the difficult decision to retire the Virgin America name and logo likely sometime in 2019," the company said in a press release. "However, many of the elements you love about Virgin America will live on, paired with Alaska’s unbeatable performance and top-rated customer service." 

Virgin America was beloved by many of its regulars. Maybe it was the mood lighting, the nifty entertainment system, the snacks and meals you could order whenever hunger struck, the leather seats. Whatever it was, it was brilliantly executed.

Not that there's anything wrong with Alaska, of course. Besides being the biggest state in the country, it's a perfectly fine airline. It just doesn't have the zing that Virgin America created.

Shazaming and such ...

But Alaska is determined to change all that and its press releases are sounding more like Virgin's all the time. 

"Imagine arriving at the airport and immediately feeling welcomed to a fresh, modern experience.

You know you’ll reach your destination on time with minimal hassle, and the airline you’ve chosen offers consistently low fares and more nonstop flights to more destinations from the West Coast than any other. At your gate, you can’t help Shazaming every song on the upbeat playlist, and the overhead announcements tell you what you need to know with a healthy dose of fun."

This might sound like your old uncle trying to be one of the cool guys, but Alaska deserves some credit for trying. It is, after all, now the fifth largest airline in the country and trying to keep that youthful vibe is a worthy goal.

Alaska says it will be making upgrades to both Alaska and Virgin aircraft over the next few years, including faster wi-fi, expanded first class and premium sections, and an integrated awards program. 

Well, you knew this was going to happen. Alaska Airlines has teased and tantalized Virgin America's loyal followers, saying it might let Virgin keep its na...

Article Image

U.S. bans electronic devices from airline cabins on some Mid-East flights

A new U.S. Transportation Department rule taking effect today prohibits passengers from carrying electronic devices aboard commercial aircraft flying directly to the U.S. from certain Middle Eastern countries.

A number of news outlets reporting the ban have quoted “senior U.S. officials” providing details of the new rule.

The devices – including smartphones, laptops, and tablets – may be packed in checked baggage.

The ban is said to be limited to flights departing 10 airports from the Middle East and North Africa and is based on security concerns. Officials told The Washington Post that intelligence continues to pick up on terrorist interest in targeting commercial aviation. The concern is that electronic devices can be modified to contain explosives.

According to Reuters, the affected cities include Cairo; Istanbul; Kuwait City; Doha, Qatar; Casablanca, Morocco; Amman, Jordan; Riyadh and Jeddah, Saudi Arabia; and Dubai and Abu Dhabi in United Arab Emirates.

Reuters quotes Department of Homeland Security spokeswoman Gillian Christensen as saying the U.S "did not target specific nations. We relied upon evaluated intelligence to determine which airports were affected."

The affected airports are served by nine airlines that have non-stop flights to the U.S. The carriers include Royal Jordanian Airlines, Egypt Air, Turkish Airlines, Saudi Arabian Airlines, Kuwait Airways, Royal Air Maroc, Qatar Airways, Emirates, and Etihad Airways.

A new U.S. Transportation Department rule taking effect today prohibits passengers from carrying electronic devices aboard commercial aircraft flying direc...

Article Image

British Airways parent launches Level, a discount trans-Atlantic carrier

Yesterday it was JetBlue eyeing lucrative trans-Atlantic routes. Now the parent company of British Airways, already an established international carrier, is elbowing its way into the fray -- announcing that it is launching a new carrier, called Level, and will start selling tickets as low as $149 today.

Level said it will fly two new Airbus A330 aircraft branded in its own livery and fitted with 293 economy and 21 premium economy seats. Initially it will be operated by Iberia’s flight and cabin crew.

The expansion of cut-rate international travel by Norwegian Air has caused legacy carriers to consider the potential costs of sitting on the tarmac while upstarts eat their in-flight snacks.

JetBlue, no longer a hungry upstart but not quite a legacy carrier either, said earlier this week that it is studying the possibility of flying a new Airbus A321LR narrow-body jet on East Coast-Western Europe routes. But JetBlue CEO Robin Hayes said he would have to be convinced the routes would yield an adequate return.

Apparently British Airways parent, International Consolidated Airlines Group SA (IAG), has already made those calculations and decided it's time to apply some thrust.

LAX and OAK

IAG said today that Level will start flying from its base in Barcelona, Spain, to airports in Los Angeles and Oakland, California, as well as Punta Cana in the Dominican Republic, and Buenos Aires, Argentina, with service starting in June. 

Checked luggage (in addition to a free cabin bag), meals, seat selection, and the latest movie releases will be complimentary for customers flying in premium economy, Level said. Those traveling in economy can "choose what they want to buy," the airline said. Entertainment and high-speed internet will be available. 

Willie Walsh, IAG chief executive, said Level would become its fifth airline brand alongside Aer Lingus, BA, Iberia, and Vueling.

"Barcelona is Vueling's home base and this will allow customers to connect from Vueling's extensive European network onto Level's long-haul flights," he said.

For decades, Atlantic routes have been dominated by legacy carriers in the U.S. and Europe -- British, American, Lufthansa, etc. More recently, lavishly funded Middle East airlines like Emirates have entered the market, offering lavish service at competitive prices. 

The entry of low-cost carriers styled on the domestic disrupters -- most notably Southwest, which upended American travel in the 1900s -- is likely to be a boon for consumers, bringing more seats and lower fares, but it is certain to be a headache for established carriers.

Emirates CEO Tim Clark called it a "gathering storm," according to a Wall Street Journal report, which is probably one of the more polite reactions among airline executives. 

Yesterday it was JetBlue eyeing lucrative trans-Atlantic routes. Now the parent company of British Airways, already an established international carrier, i...

Article Image

JetBlue eyes Europe, Air Canada hopes to 'do business' with Trump

One way or another, flights to Europe are going to be cheaper. Norwegian Air recently unveiled $65 one-way fares on some trans-Atlantic routes and now JetBlue says it is doing a "major review" of its fleet with an eye towards European flights.

Air Canada's CEO, meanwhile, says he thinks President Trump's plans to cut taxes and regulations will be good for U.S. carriers but won't hurt his company's growth prospects. 

New York-based JetBlue must decide whether it thinks it can profitably fly the Airbus A321LR (the LR stands for "long-range") from the East Coast to the United Kingdom and perhaps other Western European destrinations, according a report in Skift, an industry newsletter.

JetBlue and other airlines recently inaugurated service to several destinations in Cuba, only to scale back after passenger levels were below expectations. 

JetBlue CEO Robin Hayes said the decision boils down to whether it can make a higher rate of return flying the aircraft to Europe than to other destinations.

JetBlue has lately been making waves in the transcontinental market with its Mint business class cabin, which features lie-flat seats and other amenities at lower fares than those offered by legacy carriers. Even road warriors who have elite status on other carriers have switched to JetBlue for coast-to-coast flights because of the cut-rate premium class, according to a recent Wall Street Journal report. 

Hayes made the comments Tuesday at the J.P. Morgan Aviation, Transportation & Industrials Conference in New York.

Canada flights

Canadian airlines have been working to increase their trans-Atlantic business by routing passengers -- including many from the U.S. -- through their Toronto and Vancouver hubs. But Air Canada's CEO says the Trump Administration's plans to cut taxes and regulations may make it harder for Canadian carriers to compete. 

"The U.S is about to become even more competitive," Calin Rovinescu said in a Bloomberg report. He said Canadian carriers will be hurt if Canada proceeds with plans for a carbon tax and if a plan to privatize airports raises costs. 

Trump has said he wants to rework the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) but Rovinescu says he doesn't expect any changes to hurt Air Canada.

“We will be able to do a lot of business” with the U.S., he said, according to Bloomberg. “My sense of the border dynamics between Canada and the U.S. is that it won’t become more complicated, indeed it may well become more transparent from a commercial perspective.”

One way or another, flights to Europe are going to be cheaper. Norwegian Air recently unveiled $65 one-way fares on some trans-Atlantic routes and now JetB...

Article Image

January -- a tough month for air travelers

Getting off the ground was a major challenge in some areas if you were flying anywhere during January.

According to the Transportation Department's (DOT) Air Travel Consumer Report (ATCR), airlines reported 30 tarmac delays of more than three hours on domestic flights and 12 delays of more than four hours on international flights.

Fourteen of those long domestic delays and eight of the delays on foreign flights international were at occurred at Fort Lauderdale-Hollywood International Airport in Florida on January 6 because of a security incident. That may have had a ripple effect at other airports on this date. DOT is investigating all reported extended tarmac delays.

During the same month, carriers posted an on-time arrival rate of 76.0%. While that's not as good as the 81.3% on-time rate a year earlier, it is a bit better than December's 75.6% mark.

The airlines also report canceling 2.0% of their scheduled domestic flights in January, an improvement over the year-ago rate of 2.6%, but worse than the 1.6% rate chalked up a month earlier.

The ATCR, which is found on the DOT website, also includes data on chronically delayed flights, and the causes of flight delays, and other problems with baggage, reservation and ticketing, refunds, customer service, disability, and discrimination. 

Getting off the ground was a major challenge in some areas if you were flying anywhere during January.According to the Transportation Department's (DOT...

Article Image

Congressional bill would provide more seat room on airlines

An expanding nation needs room to spread out. That's the thinking behind proposed Congressional legislation that would provide a minimum seat size on commercial airliners, as well as a minimum distance between rows of seats.

The measure, introduced in both the House and Senate, is aptly titled SEAT -- Seat Egress in Air Travel. 

“Airline passengers are tired of being squeezed,” said Rep. Steve Cohen (D-Tenn.). “Shrinking seat sizes in airplanes isn’t just a matter of comfort but the safety and health of passengers as well. Planes need to be capable of rapid evacuation in case of emergency. In addition, doctors have warned that deep vein thrombosis can afflict passengers who do not move their legs enough during longer flights. The safety and health of passengers must come before airline profits."

Profits soar, seats shrink

“As airlines’ profits skyrocket, passengers’ seats keep shrinking,” Senator Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.) said. “The incredible shrinking airline seat is more than just an inconvenience. Raising concerns of deadly blood clots and slowed evacuation, today’s cramped cabins threaten the health and safety of passengers. This commonsense bill would establish a minimum seat size and return some much-needed sanity to our skies.”

The average distance between rows of seats has dropped from 35 inches before airline deregulation in the 1970s to about 31 inches today. The average width of an airline seat has also shrunk from 18 inches to about 16 1/2.  

Congress is working to renew authorization for the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) with the current authority set to expire on September 30, 2017. The SEAT Act was introduced as an amendment to FAA Reauthorization legislation last year.

An expanding nation needs room to spread out. That's the thinking behind proposed Congressional legislation that would provide a minimum seat size on comme...

Article Image

Spirit Airlines is ranked the worst airline in America

Last year, Spirit Airlines earned the lowest score on American Customer Satisfaction Index's travel report, the travel survey. The budget airline, which offers low base fares but charges fees for carry-on luggage larger than 2,688 cubic inches, brushed off its poor survey results and maintained that its business model offers more choice.  

"Things that are often considered 'free' on other airlines, there is a cost associated with them, even if fliers don't want them," a Spirit spokesman told CNN last year. "We are giving customers a choice on what they have to pay for."

By that logic, Spirit this year will soon give customers even more choice. The airline announced in February that it will be cutting the size of carry-on bags allowed on its flights this spring, down to just 2,016 cubic inches. 

Detailed analysis puts Spirit at the bottom again 

While that business model is now attracting copy-cat fare structures from other airlines, Spirit's popularity among customers continues to remain in the tank. A new report published this week again ranks Spirit at the bottom among customer satisfaction. 

The Points Guy, a travel website, says that they used sources in the airline industry as well as thousands of pages worth of government and corporate documents to determine the best and worst airlines in America. For example, The Points Guy writes that they used reports submitted to the Department of Transportation to calculate statistics on lost baggage.

Spirit, they write, "finished dead last in four different criteria — on-time arrivals, customer satisfaction, cabin comfort and its frequent flyer program," the report says, "and second to last in another (unsurprisingly, its baggage and change fees)." 

Spirit's press office has not yet returned an inquiry from ConsumerAffairs. 

Airlines undeterred by Spirit's low rankings

American Airlines and United Airlines last year both introduced "basic" fares, in which passengers would pay less but then be charged for their carry-on luggage. United States Senator Chuck Shumer has called on the airlines to drop those new Spirit-like policies, which he said have "made it harder for everyday consumers to fly by banning the free use of the overhead bin for some travelers.” 

American, without naming Spirit, defended its new fee structure by saying that it gives the airline the "the ability to compete more effectively with the growing number of ultra-low cost carriers."

Last year, Spirit Airlines earned the lowest score on American Customer Satisfaction Index's travel report, the travel survey. The budget airline, which of...

Article Image

American Airlines announces new boarding process

The airline industry has gone through some changes as of late, the most notable being the inclusion of a “basic economy fare.” While Southwest recently derided the fare as being a “huge mistake,”  companies like Delta, United, and American Airlines have all jumped on the bandwagon.

Now, American has announced an update to its boarding process that will take the new fare into account. The company says that starting March 1, boarding groups will no longer be called by their current name. Instead, travelers will now board as part of a group ranging from Group 1 to Group 9.

The changes may spark some confusion amongst travelers, who are used to the airline only using four groups to designate main boarding lanes. Now, however, groups 1-4 designate priority boarding lanes, while groups 5-9 represent main boarding lanes. Basic Economy travelers will board as part of Group 9.

The full boarding lineup can be viewed below:

Photo credit: Jfarr11 - Wikimedia CommonsThe airline industry has gone through some changes as of late, the most notable being the inclusion of a “ba...

Article Image

Norwegian Air to offer $65 one-way trans-Atlantic fare

Travel between the U.S. and Europe isn't exactly cheap. That is, unless you get booked on one of Norwegian Air's newly-approved flights between the U.S. and Ireland and the UK, for $65 one-way.

The Trump administration has given the green light for the low fares after a protracted political battle. The application, which the Obama administration called one of the most complicated ever, was bitterly opposed within the airline industry and took three years to complete. The Obama administration gave preliminary approval to Norwegian Air late last year.

Norwegian says the low fare service will begin this summer and go to $99 one-way after the introductory promotion.

New York to Ireland

On its website, Norwegian Air is currently promoting $65 fares to Dublin, Shannon, Belfast, Cork, and Edinburgh, Scotland. Flights depart in the U.S. from New York, Hartford, Conn., and Boston/Providence.

The airline said it plans to expand its schedule in the future, which may be one reason its rivals and unions opposed the approval. According to The Hill, aviation insiders have accused Norwegian Air of attempting to skirt tougher regulations in Norway by establishing its hub in Ireland. It's also accused of trying to slash labor costs by hiring pilots in Asia, where salaries are lower.

Norwegian Air denies it, saying it plans to use mostly U.S.-based crews and U.S.-built plans. Still, unions representing pilots and flight attendants said they are considering litigation to overturn the approval.

Travel between the U.S. and Europe isn't exactly cheap. That is, unless you get booked on one of Norwegian Air's newly-approved flights between the U.S. an...

Article Image

Southwest Airlines claims no interest in adding a Basic Economy fare

It used to be that airliners strove to out-do each other in providing amenities to passengers. But in an ironic twist, many carriers have begun taking away flight perks to lower the ticket price.

No-frills fares has been a growing trend in the airline industry. Delta was the first to hop on board with the idea when it revealed its Basic Economy fare, which lowered ticket prices in exchange for no seat assignments and ineligibility for complimentary upgrades and same-day travel changes. United and American Airlines followed suit – doling out extra low fares while also restricting overhead bin space and carry-on baggage.

However, not every airline thinks the practice is a good idea. In a meeting with investors, CEO Gary Kelly said that Southwest Airlines would not be creating a Basic Economy fare because it would cause confusion.

“There is a huge value in offering all of our customers – 100% of them – a great product. We like to say at Southwest, there is no second class,” Kelly stated, according to USA Today. Additionally, Kelly stated that offering a Basic Economy fare would go against the company’s identity and represent a “huge mistake.”

“Any time we contemplate offering customers a choice, we debate that heavily because complexity drives confusion and clouds the brand. What you have at Southwest is a very strong brand position in customers’ minds that we stand for friendliness, reliability and low fares. The whole free bags and no change fees becomes a very powerful component out of all that. So we don’t feel like we need [Basic Economy],” he explained.

In a bit of jab to his competitors, Kelly went on to say that other airliners’ focus on “elite” packages only serves to push other travelers away, something that Southwest doesn’t support. “Every other competitor, they lavish attention on elite customers and ignore the rest. That is our biggest opportunity because we don’t ignore anybody,” he said.

It used to be that airliners strove to out-do each other in providing amenities to passengers. But in an ironic twist, many carriers have begun taking away...

Article Image

Delta still coping with weekend computer glitch

Another computer glitch hit Delta Airlines over the weekend, the second in five months. But after numerous cancellations and delays, Delta says it's getting back to normal. Still, travelers could continue to feel the effects.

At 7:00 a.m. today, Delta issued a statement reporting that it is operating most of its flight schedule as it continues to recover from the systems crash that threw its schedule into turmoil Sunday. Delta said it had to cancel about 170 flights Sunday and might have to cancel more than 110 today.

“I want to apologize to all of our customers who have been impacted by this frustrating situation,” said Delta CEO Ed Bastian, in a statement. “This type of disruption is not acceptable to the Delta family, which prides itself on reliability and customer service. I also want to thank our employees who are working tirelessly to accommodate our customers.”

Not happy

Consumers who were inconvenienced were understandably irked. Bill, of Naples, Fla., posted a review to ConsumerAffairs as he sat aboard an aircraft, complaining that the airline was doing nothing to make a bad situation better.

"We have been sitting in a line of 60 grounded planes on the runway at ATL for nearly 2 hours (so far) and in addition to receiving no information, the flight attendants are RESTING," Bill wrote in a post. "The other First Class passengers are a bit confused by this non-customer service behavior of the flight attendant staff. It is bad enough that Delta have an obviously unstable and/insecure computer system; but, the service is becoming terrible."

The airline said its major IT systems went down at 6:30 p.m. Sunday. By midnight, Delta said things were returning to normal.

Check the schedule

Customers flying Delta today should check the airline's website or the Fly Delta app. Delta said it has waived the change fee for customers who were scheduled to fly yesterday and today.

For air travelers, coping with airline computer glitches has become an almost regular occurrence. Just days ago, a computer glitch hit the United Airlines system. The impact was shorter-lived. The system was restored in about an hour.

In August, both Delta and Southwest suffered technical breakdowns within days of one another. In the Southwest outage, the airline was forced to cancel 2,300 flights, stranding passengers all over the country.

Delta's August outage forced it to cancel more than 1,250 flights.

Another computer glitch hit Delta Airlines over the weekend, the second in five months. But after numerous cancellations and delays, Delta says it's gettin...

Article Image

United Airlines flights grounded by computer glitch

Airline companies have come to rely on computer systems in order to keep things running smoothly, but a lot can go wrong when those systems break down. Consumers may remember the technical glitches that affected Southwest Airlines and Delta Airlines last year, which led to thousands of canceled flights and millions in lost revenue.

Now, another airline company has been plagued by its own technical problem. According to a Reuters report, United Airlines was forced to ground all of its domestic flights for around an hour last night due to an “IT issue.” The company announced the ground halt in a tweet at 9:06 EST and apologized for the inconvenience.

However, stranded fliers lashed out at the company both online and in person. “This has been the worst customer service experience and worst flying service ever experienced in 30+ years,” one traveler said. The airliner offered to waive change fees and provide travel waivers to affected passengers, but the damage had been done. After about an hour, the company announced that it had lifted the ground stop and resumed flights.

The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) said that no international flights were stopped by the computer glitch but was unsure of how many domestic flights had been affected.

What’s also uncertain is how much the ground halt will end up costing United. The reparations paid to travelers, the loss of business, and the potential drop in unit prices could certainly add up. Experts estimated that Southwest lost between $54 million and $82 million as a result of its computer glitch in July, so the losses might not necessarily be chump change.

Airline companies have come to rely on computer systems in order to keep things running smoothly, but a lot can go wrong when those systems break down. Con...

Article Image

Air India launching women-only rows to deter sexual assaults

Forget about business class. Air India is setting aside "women-only" rows on its flights, hoping to reduce complaints about male passengers groping and harassing women travelers. It's thought to be the first airline to do so.

The airline said there will be two rows set aside for women on its domestic flights starting this week, expanding to its international routes later in the year. There will be no fee to sit in the designated rows, which will be open only to single women, not those traveling with families.

“It is our responsibility to enhance comfort level to female passengers,” Air India’s general manager Meenakshi Malik said, according to a report in The Guardian. 

The airline made the decision after two recent incidents of men allegedly groping cabin staff and other passengers.

And just in case the set-aside rows aren't enough, Air India said it is also equipping its airplanes with restraints that can be used to corral unruly passengers. 

While this might sound like gender discrimination to U.S. travelers, The Guardian noted that separating the sexes is not unheard of in India, which already has segregated train carriages and buses. There are pink auto-rickshaws driven by women in some Indian cities.

Forget about business class. Air India is setting aside "women-only" rows on its flights, hoping to reduce complaints about male passengers groping and har...

Article Image

Passenger group seeks greater airport security

The fatal attack at the Ft. Lauderdale, Fla., airport Friday has sparked new concerns about passenger safety, with passenger groups, TSA officers and lawmakers all calling for tighter security in non-secure areas -- the parts of airports that are accessible to the general public, which includes baggage claim areas in many airports. 

Five people were killed and eight others wounded last week when a man opened fire in a baggage claim area. Authorities say a 26-year-old Iraq War veteran arrived at Ft. Lauderdale aboard a flight originating in Alaska. After retrieving his handgun from his checked baggage, they say he went into a restroom to load it.

Authorities say when Esteban Santiago emerged he began firing at people at random. When he ran out of ammunition, they say he lay down on the floor and waited to be arrested.

FlyersRights.org, a passenger rights consumer group, has issued a statement, calling for more security at the nation's airports, saying this latest attack just underscores the fact that air transportation remains “a prime target for terrorism and mass murder.”

"This horrific shooting is just another reminder that more needs to be done to secure our nation's airports," J. David Cox Sr., national president of the American Federation of Government Employees, said in a statement. "AFGE has long-called for extensive training for TSA Officers and the creation of a new unit of trained and armed law enforcement officers within TSA at airports nationwide. Lawmakers and airport officials must implement increased security measures to ensure the safety of passengers and all airport personnel."

After the 2015 shooting at Los Angeles International Airport left a TSA officer dead, lawmakers tasked TSA with reassessing the whole question of airport security, particularly in perimeter areas. But as is often the case in Washington, not much happened. Now lawmakers are again calling for action.

"There's no question we need to review not only the question of whether people should be able to travel with their firearms even if they're in checked baggage, but I think we need to take a hard look at the security around baggage claim areas, and not just leave it at that," Democratic Rep. Debbie Wasserman-Schultz of Florida said, according to the Associated Press.

At this point police and intelligence agencies aren't sure of the motivation for the attack, but note that Santiago had recently been treated for numerous mental health issues since his discharge from the army. He reportedly told the FBI at one point that he believed the government was controlling his mind, forcing him to watch ISIS videos.

Previous requests for beefed up security

In its statement, FlyersRights.org noted that it had asked the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) and Congress to provide for stronger airport security after a shooting attack at Los Angeles International (LAX) Airport in 2013. It said it renewed the request last July after the Brussels and Istanbul airport massacres, but said nothing was done.

The group said it wants to see the use of the National Guard as a temporary security force at the nation's airports. It also calls for the installation of airport perimeter security to detect weapons and other threats.

Other measures include a ban on live ammunition in checked bags; increased use of canine patrols to detect explosives; and putting anyone who is deemed a security threat by a law enforcement agency on the TSA Watch or No Fly list, but with due process means for removal.

"Those victims at Ft. Lauderdale should not have died, and should certainly not have died in vain,” said Paul Hudson, president of FlyersRights.org. “Blood on the ground is unfortunately too often the price for government officials to act."

The fatal attack at the Ft. Lauderdale, Fla., airport Friday has sparked new concerns about passenger safety.FlyersRights.org, a passenger rights consu...

Article Image

Delta begins tests to provide complimentary meals to coach passengers

At the beginning of the month, we reported the results of a study by New York’s Hunter College that assessed which airlines had the best food. While Virgin America took top honors, Delta Airlines came in a close second for its low-calorie and vegan options.

While having high marks on food quality is nice, many fliers today must pay extra for an in-flight meal if they’re flying coach and going on a long flight. However, Delta has recently said that it will be testing complimentary meals for coach passengers on some transcontinental flights.

“Delta is currently testing complimentary meals in the Main Cabin on Transcon flights between New York-JFK and Los Angeles International Airport/San Francisco International Airport as part of the airline’s focus on continually looking at ways to enhance the on-board experience for customers,” the company said in an announcement.

Depending on what time travelers are flying, they could be treated to one of a few meal options. For those flying in the morning, the company says that participating flights will be offering a Maple Breakfast Sandwich or the Luvo Breakfast Medley. Those flying in the afternoon can choose from a Mesquite-Smoked Turkey Combo with chips and a brownie bite or the Luvo Mediterranean Whole Grain Veggie wrap, which comes with grapes and a cookie.

While many airlines have begun restricting certain free amenities on flights in order to charge a premium, Delta’s possible inclusion of a free meal could mark a reversal. Delta Senior Vice President of In-Flight Service Allison Ausband says that the company is trying to improve the flight experience to meet consumer demand.

“We are constantly actively listening to our customers and employees, gathering their feedback and testing new products on board to continuously improve the overall experience. Testing meals on Transcon flights is part of our commitment to be thoughtful about our offerings and make decisions based on customers’ needs,” she said.

At the beginning of the month, we reported the results of a study by New York’s Hunter College that assessed which airlines had the best food. While Virgin...

Article Image

FAA proposes civil penalty against Resorts World companies

The next time you decide to fly to the islands for some sun and fun, you might want to take a close look at the airline you've chosen.

The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) is proposing a civil penalty of $218,700 civil against Resorts World Aviation and Resorts World Bimini.

The companies are accused of flying passengers without an FAA air carrier certificate or with pilots who had not been trained and checked for commercial operations.

The charges

According to the agency, Resorts World Aviation provided Resorts World Bimini casino players and other guests with nine for-hire flights between July 10 and July 19, 2015. The flights were between the Miami area and Bimini in the Bahamas.

The companies operated the flights when they did not hold the required FAA certificate to carry passengers for hire, according to the FAA, or the economic authorization from the Transportation Department to operate as an air carrier.

Additionally, the FAA claims pilots flying the planes did not have the required training and proficiency checks to conduct the operations involved. The agency also says the companies advertised to perform the operations despite not having FAA authorization.

The companies have asked to meet with the FAA to discuss the case.

The next time you decide to fly to the islands for some sun and fun, you might want to take a close look at the airline you've chosen.The Federal Aviat...

Article Image

Sen. Chuck Schumer rails against United Airlines' baggage policy under new fare

Last month, United Airlines released information on its new Basic Economy fare. It immediately garnered attention from regulators and fliers due to a provision that limits the amount of carry-on baggage that can be brought on the plane.

Under the new fare, fliers would only be allowed to bring one small item with them into the cabin, measuring a maximum of 9 inches by 10 inches by 17 inches. The items would need to be stored under the seat, and if it didn’t fit, then the flier would have to pay to check it.

While the purpose of the new rule was to cut down on boarding time and clutter in the aisles, many have come out in opposition. One of them is New York Senator Chuck Schumer, who says that the measure is “one of the most restrictive polices” that travelers have faced for some time, according to the New York Post.

Nickel-and-dimed

“The overhead bin is one of the last sacred conveniences of air travel and the fact that United Airlines—and potentially others—plan to take that convenience away unless you pay up is really troubling. . . Air travelers are sick and tired of being nickel-and-dimed for every bag they carry and every morsel they eat by airlines that are already making sky-high profits,” he said.

Schumer says that the new policy would end up costing consumers quite a lot over the next four years, estimating that United stands to make an additional $1 billion from charges on the Basic Economy fare by 2020. In a release, he points out the unfairness of customers being locked out of lower prices unless they give up their rights to the overhead bin, calling the situation a “lose-lose.”

“No matter the ticket price, the overhead bin should be free. Period,” he said. “It seems like each year, airlines devise a new, ill-conceived plan to hit consumers and it has simply got to stop. Already, airlines charge extra for checked luggage, pillows, peanuts, and headphones and now you’ll have nowhere to store them. United Airlines should reverse this plan and allow the free use of the overhead bin for all.”

Last month, United Airlines released information on its new Basic Economy fare. It immediately garnered attention from regulators and fliers due to a provi...

Article Image

Virgin America rated first in food, Delta and Air Canada tie for second

The words "airline food" are usually good for a laugh, but at New York's Hunter College, researchers take the subject seriously. They've just completed the latest annual study rating the food choices at 12 airlines.

The winner was Virgin America, followed by Delta and Air Canada, which tied for second. Frontier was dead last, with the researchers recommending you bring your own food.

The study is directed by Charles Platkin, PhD, JD, MPH, the executive director of the NYC Food Policy Center at Hunter College and editor of DietDetective.com. The study assigned a "Health Score" (5 stars = highest rate, 0 stars = lowest) based on ten criteria, including health and calorie levels of meals, snack boxes and individual snacks, improvement and maintenance of healthy offerings, menu innovation, and cooperation in providing nutritional information. 

Summary of Health Ratings (5 stars = highest rating):

  • Virgin America 4.25 stars,
  • Delta 4 stars,
  • Air Canada 4 stars,
  • Alaska Air 3.75 stars,
  • JetBlue 3.5 stars,
  • United Airlines 3.25 stars,
  • American 3 stars,
  • Southwest Airlines 2 stars,
  • Allegiant Air 1.75 stars,
  • Hawaii 1.75 stars,
  • Spirit Airlines 1 star,
  • Frontier Air 1 star

Highlights, low points

Here are a few of the researchers' findings and comments:

Virgin America

Best Bets: Avoid the individual snack if you can. Even the nuts, which are the best choice, are high in calories if you consume the entire package. Always choose a real meal if you can, even if it's slightly more calories it will keep you full longer.

For breakfast, try the Udi's Granola with Yogurt and Fruit, which is a bit high in sugar but overall low in calories at 330. The best snack box is the Protein Meal with hummus, nuts, and tuna; the others are a bit high in calories and are not really worth it.

Delta Air Lines

Best Bets: For a snack, the nuts are the best choice -- even over the lower-calorie pretzels. The vegan, gmo-free Tapas Snack Box is a good healthy choice if you share or make it a meal (it's too high in calories as a snack). 

Air Canada

Best Bets: For breakfast, the Greek yogurt is still a good option and will probably fill you up. And while the egg sandwich has bacon, it's low in calories and has slightly more protein than the yogurt. The Chicken Soup is a low calorie choice for a snack that will fill you up, but be wary of the 950mg of sodium if you have high blood pressure. The Celery & Carrots with Ranch Dip (if you use no more than half the dip) is still an OK choice. 

Southwest Airlines

The peanuts are the best, even though the pretzels are lower in calories. There haven't been many healthy changes to the menu, and don't be fooled by the word "veggie" in the wheat thins.

Frontier Airlines

Best Bets: Perhaps the trail mix -- but we had to estimate the calories and don't know the nutrient values - share it and you'll be safe. Also, if you're not sodium sensitive you can grab the jerky. Bring your own food is the bottom line.

The complete study is available online.

The words "airline food" are usually good for a laugh, but at New York's Hunter College, researchers take the subject seriously. They've just completed the...

Article Image

Strikes at O'Hare and other airports postponed until after the holidays

Last week, we reported that hundreds of low-wage workers at O’Hare International Airport in Chicago were poised to go on strike this week. Nearly 2,000 employees – ranging from baggage handlers to security guards and cleaning staff – had voted on a walk-out over low wages, unpaid overtime, and retaliation against union organizers.

Many worried that the strike would affect consumers looking to fly for Thanksgiving, but now it seems that holiday air travelers won’t have to worry. ABC7 in Chicago reports that workers have decided to begin their protest the Tuesday after Thanksgiving, November 29.

Workers stated that they didn’t want to complicate plans for the nearly 22 million fliers looking to travel for the holidays. However, when the strike does finally start, they say that O’Hare won’t be the only airport affected. The Service Employees International Union (SEIU) has now said that almost 20 other airports will be joining in the strike, including big hubs like Newark International Airport and Los Angeles International Airport.

“Workers will send a message to the major airlines that it’s time they take responsibility for their standards of service and care for the nearly two million passengers who travel through those major airports each day and for the workers whose dedication and hard work help to generate $36 billion in profits for the aviation industry,” SEIU officials said. 

Last week, we reported that hundreds of low-wage workers at O’Hare International Airport in Chicago were poised to go on strike this week. Nearly 2,000 emp...

Article Image

New United fare limits carry-on bags

Since airlines began tacking on fees for checked bags, airline passengers have tried to carry as much of their luggage as possible into the cabin of the aircraft, cramming it into the overhead bins.

A new fare from United Airlines aims to free up some space in the overhead compartments.

United has introduced what it calls its Basic Economy fare, which has a number of features. But the one getting the most attention is what passengers can and cannot carry on.

According to the airline, carry-on bags will be limited to one personal item, unless the customer is a MileagePlus Premier member, primary cardmember of a qualifying MileagePlus credit card, or Star Alliance Gold member.

And notably, that one carry-on item has to be small enough to fit under the seat. It's not going in the overhead bin. If the carry-on item doesn't fit under the seat, it will have to be checked and the passenger will be charged the applicable fee.

Other features

Other features of the Basic Economy fare include automatic seat assignments in which a party traveling together may not sit together and will be in the last boarding group. Basic Economy passengers will not be eligible for Economy Plus or premium cabin upgrades. There will also be no voluntary ticket changes except as stated in the United 24-hour flexible booking policy.

United says Basic Economy fares won't be offered in all markets, and the selection of flights where they are available will be subject to change. Consumers will know when it is available as an option because it will be displayed along with the rest of the flight's seating options.

“You'll be able to book Basic Economy tickets the same ways that you book other United flights, including through united.com, the United app, the United Customer Contact Center, a travel agency or other online booking tools,” the airline said.

Despite all the limitations, United is quick to point out that consumers flying Basic Economy will get many of the other amenities other coach passengers enjoy, including food and beverage service, in-flight entertainment, and Wi-Fi.

Since airlines began tacking on fees for checked bags, airline passengers have tried to carry as much of their luggage as possible into the cabin of the ai...

Article Image

Flight cancellations hit all-time low in September

Airlines canceled a miniscule 0.3% of their scheduled domestic flights in September.

According to the Department of Transportation (DOT), that's the lowest level for any of the 261 months with comparable records since January 1995. The previous low point had been 0.4% a year earlier.

In more good news for the flying public, airlines reported no tarmac delays of more than three hours on domestic flights and no tarmac delays of more than four hours on international flights.

Discrimination complaints

As it released its report, the government made information about discrimination complaints it's received public for the first time. The data covers the number of complaints received in each of the protected classes of race, ancestry, national origin, color, religion, and sex.

From January to September 2016, 67 complaints were filed by consumers claiming discrimination by airlines: 52 regarding race, eight regarding national origin, one regarding color, two regarding religion, and four regarding sex.

This is an increase from the 49 complaints alleging discrimination received during the first nine months of last year. In September 2016 alone, there were six complaints alleging discrimination -- three regarding race, two regarding national origin, and one regarding religion. This compared with the total of eight recorded in September 2015 and the 15 recorded in August 2016. All complaints alleging discrimination are investigated.

The consumer report also includes data related to on-time performance, chronically delayed flights, and the causes of flight delays, along with a range of issues such as flight problems, baggage, reservation and ticketing, refunds, customer service, and disability.

The complete report is available on the DOT website.

Airlines canceled a miniscule 0.3% of their scheduled domestic flights in September.According to the Department of Transportation (DOT), that's the low...

Article Image

Start of new TSA Pre-Check program hits a bump in the road

Back in May, we reported how consumers were becoming increasingly frustrated with airport security delays. Lines in some of the nation’s prominent hubs seemed to be endless, but TSA stated that it was understaffed and unable to deal with the volume of travelers.

One solution that the agency suggested for passengers was enrolling in its PreCheck program, which makes the screening process much quicker. Officials hoped to enroll 25 million U.S. travelers in the program, but those numbers haven’t materialized – and now there appears to be another bump in the road.

According to a report from the Los Angeles Times, TSA has put the brakes on hiring private vendors that could help register fliers for TSA Pre-Check. The reason? The agency feels that using new vendors would be unwise “in light of the increased and evolving cybersecurity risks over the past year.”

Cybersecurity concerns

TSA officials say they are concerned that cyber criminals could target new vendors that perform background checks on passengers to steal private information.

While the move may be welcomed by privacy and consumer advocacy groups, it certainly won’t win many points with frustrated travelers who want to sign up for the program. Sources report that only 4 million people have been signed up for the TSA Pre-Check program thus far, well below their stated goal.

Critics say that the blame for future long lines may land squarely on TSA. For those who don’t remember how bad things got this past summer, here’s a video taken from a traveler at Chicago’s Midway airport. Please note that the footage does contain strong language.

Some hope

However, there is some hope that things will run more smoothly going forward. TSA Administrator Peter Neffenger has said that a plan approved by Congress – which created 13,068 new positions and converted 2,000 part-time screeners to full-time employees – could make a big difference in expediting the security check process.

Additionally, Neffenger stated that the agency has put together a “deployment force” made up of 1,000 screeners that can be sent to any airport that is expected to see an influx of air travelers. This mobile force could help alleviate the stress of many holiday travelers that are expected to surge in the coming months.

Back in May, we reported how consumers were becoming increasingly frustrated with airport security delays. Lines in some of the nation’s prominent hubs see...

Article Image

Ex-flight attendant claims Horizon Air crew was drunk and disorderly

A former flight attendant has filed a lawsuit against Alaska Airlines claiming she was effectively terminated for reporting that the pilot and other crew members of Alaska subsidiary Horizon Air went out drinking late the night prior to an early-morning flight. 

The suit filed in Multnomah County Court, Oregon, seeks $800,000 in damages for Vickie Brown, who charges that she was effectively fired after a 15-year career because she reported the unruly and drunken behavior of fellow flight-crew members.

"Ms. Brown was employed by Horizon as a Flight Attendant; she resigned from the company this year," a company spokeswoman told ConsumerAffairs. "We do not comment on ongoing litigation."

Brown said that on Feb. 6, 2016, she and other crew members were staying at a hotel near Bellingham International Airport (BLI) in a room next to the one occupied by the captain. She was invited to go out drinking with the captain and other crew members but declined, the suit states.

She heard the crew return later that night and said they were "loud and disruptive."

Kicked out of the bar

"The crew had in fact been out drinking past curfew and had been so heavily intoxicated that they were kicked out of one bar and so went to another before returning to the hotel," the suit alleges.

The crew was scheduled to catch a 4 a.m. van to the airport the next morning. Brown said she encountered the captain getting coffee and found him looking "disheveled and exhausted" and said that she could smell alcohol coming from her fellow crew members.

Federal regulations forbid flight crews to consume alcohol within ten hours of a flight.

Brown said she looked for someone she could report her concerns to but found no supervisor at the airport. She also could not locate the airline's safety hotline number, she said.

While she looked for the hotline number, Brown said, the aircraft doors were closed and the plane began to taxi before safety and compliance checks had been completed.

The flight arrived safely in Portland, where Brown declined to continue on the next leg. She said one of the flight attendants who had been out drinking also left the flight in Portland, saying she was ill.

Passed out

"Later that day, [Brown] spoke with another flight attendant [who said the captain] was talking about the previous night and mentioned that a flight attendant ... had passed out in his room and that he had wondered if he should tell his wife about it," the suit alleges.

Brown said that after leaving the flight, she reported the incident to her supervisor but said there was "no indication" the crew was tested for alcohol or that any other action was taken.

Brown said the incident left her feeling anxious and she called in sick for the next several flights. She said her later reports to management were met with "disinterest and condescension." 

Brown said other flight attendants told her the captain was angry at her for reporting him and she felt she faced a hostile work environment. 

"The message was clear: Horizon did not think this was a serious issue and was going to do nothing to protect" her from retaliation by the captain. "She was on her own and if she didn't like it she shouldn't come to work," the suit alleges.

She left the airline Oct. 5, saying she could no longer work in what had become a "toxic work environment."

A flight attendant has filed a lawsuit against Alaska Airlines claiming she was effectively terminated for reporting that the pilot and other crew members...

Article Image

Rankings for the best and worst U.S. airports

Experienced air travelers know which airports they like and which ones to stay away from. Unfortunately, for those of us who don’t fly as much, bad service and amenities can often catch us by surprise.

To address this issue, the folks over at ThePointsGuy.com – a travel and lifestyle media platform -- took a look at the 30 busiest airports in the U.S. and ranked them from best to worst.

Each was judged on a variety of factors, including flight delays, cancellations, average security wait times, distance from the city center, public transit options, bars and restaurants, lounges, Wi-Fi costs, and parking rates.

Best and worst

The study found that Phoenix Sky Harbor International was the best airport in the U.S. It is the closest airport to its city’s center, has the second-best public transit time, third-cheapest parking, third-most restaurants and bars per capita, and the fifth-fewest flight cancellations.

Rounding out the top five were Portland International Airport in Oregon; San Diego International Airport, Salt Lake City International Airport, and Honolulu International Airport.

On the other hand, frequent fliers in New York will dismayed -- thought not surprised -- that two of their most well-known airports make the bottom of the list. La Guardia Airport, located in Queens, came in dead last due to having the most flight delays, most cancellations, and most expensive parking of all the airports surveyed.

John F. Kennedy Airport, also in Queens, occupies the second-to-last spot for having the longest security wait times and longest driving time from the city center.

The other three contenders at the bottom of the list included Detroit Metropolitan Airport, Chicago O’Hare International Airport, and Newark Liberty International Airport.

To see the complete list, visit the researchers' site here. 

Experienced air travelers know which airports they like and which ones to stay away from. Unfortunately, for those of us who don’t fly as much, bad service...

Article Image

Thanksgiving air travel projected to rise 2.5%

If you are traveling by air this Thanksgiving weekend, hopefully you have booked your flight by now.

If not, you may not only have a hard time making connections, but you'll pay the premium rate.

For those of you who have your tickets and made your plans, you might want to get to the airport a little early. Estimates suggest there will be crowded terminals.

Airlines for America (A4A), the industry trade group, projects 27.3 million consumers will travel by air during the Thanksgiving travel period, a rise of 2.5% over last Thanksgiving. The group says that amounts to an extra 55,000 passengers a day.

74,000 extra seats

For their part, the airlines say they can handle the extra load. Domestic airlines have added 74,000 seats per day by adding flights and replacing smaller planes with larger ones.

The reason more consumers are flocking to the nation's airports is no mystery. The airlines have lowered fares, passing on some of their fuel savings to consumers.

“Airlines are adding capacity to accommodate the increased demand, and travelers should rest assured that while more people will be flying, there will be more than an adequate number of seats available,” said A4A Vice President and Chief Economist John Heimlich.

Airlines may have increased their capacity to handle the expected increase in passengers, but what about the boarding process? Should travelers expect bottlenecks at airport security checkpoints?

Bottlenecks?

The airlines say these checkpoints should be manageable because of the increased number of consumers who have registered for programs like PreCheck, that moves passengers through the screening process faster.

The Transportation Security Administration says that consumers who purchase a five-year membership for $85 will be able to get through the security checkpoint and board the aircraft without having to remove their shoes, laptops, liquids, belts, and light jackets.

TSA says it's still a good idea to arrive at the airport two hours before your flight, especially during the Thanksgiving travel period. You'll find TSA's additional tips for reducing your waiting time in line here.

If you are traveling by air this Thanksgiving weekend, hopefully you have booked your flight by now.If not, you may not only have a hard time making co...

Article Image

Southwest reaffirms its stance on not charging baggage fees

The airline industry can be a harsh business. In a world where money is king and companies are always looking out for the bottom line, not scraping in revenue from every available source is practically unheard of.

However, “practically” may be the operative word. Southwest Airlines has been under pressure to generate more revenue. The company is the only one of the largest commercial airliners in the U.S. that doesn’t charge a baggage fee, so the money is there for the taking. But, according to a Los Angeles Times report, CEO Gary Kelly has stated that the company won’t be doing that, at least for now.

“We have a unique and beloved position in the industry with this approach and we would be foolish to squander it, so no thought whatsoever on charging bags,” Kelly said in a recent quarterly earnings call.

Southwest woes

The decision to let bags fly for free is great for consumers, but it potentially costs Southwest millions every year. Last year, the top 13 airline companies raked in $3.8 billion in bag fees, along with another $3 billion in charges that consumers paid for changing or canceling flight reservations – another service that Southwest doesn’t charge for.

As a result, investors have cranked up the heat on the company to start tapping these revenue streams. Recent earnings reports haven’t been very favorable; last quarter’s earnings were down by nearly $200 million year-over-year, and the recent technology outage in July cost the company dearly. Kelly also cites increased competition as a major factor in the company’s bad fortunes.

“The fare environment is very competitive and we have seen an increase in competitor seats in our markets that is fairly significant year-over-year,” he said.

The CEO says that he has plans to bring in more revenue soon, though he remained tight-lipped about what those plans actually involved. “Well, it’s just not ready for prime time. And I’d rather not share with our competitors where we see opportunities for a variety of reasons,” Kelly explained.

The airline industry can be a harsh business. In a world where money is king and companies are always looking out for the bottom line, not scraping in reve...

Article Image

New York looks to crack down on Airbnb

Airbnb has faced regulatory obstacles for years now. In the past, several state agencies had called on the company to make the names of hosts available. And back in May, the city of Santa Monica cracked down on the business by making it illegal for residents to rent a home for less than 30 days.

The new law ran afoul of local Airbnb host Scott Shatford, who made thousands of dollars every month by renting out his rental properties. The city ended up fining him, and Shatford relinquished $3,500 and said he was moving away to greener pastures in Denver.

Now, due to similar circumstances, New York lawmakers may be looking to pass a new bill that would impose penalties of up to $7,500 on consumers who violate a previous state law that forbids rentals of less than 30 days if the owner or tenant of a property isn’t present. Proponents applaud the measure, saying that Airbnb hurts hotels and takes apartments off the long-term rental market because it is more profitable for owners to rent them at a nightly rate.

“These illegal rentals are not just breaking the law, they are breaking the back of already dangerously thin affordable housing supply,” stated New York Councilmember Corey Johnson.

Removal or regulation?

The majority of Airbnb rentals are listed in New York City, but the measure would also cover other areas of New York as well. Currently, the bill is awaiting approval from Governor Andrew Cuomo, who has until October 29 to either sign or veto it. If he takes no action, the measure will become law anyway.

Assemblywoman Linda Rosenthal, who sponsored the bill, says that it is necessary for New York to stop property owners from using their apartment buildings like hotels. A previous investigation by the state attorney general’s office found that 72% of Airbnb rentals in New York City between 2010 and 2014 were illegal.

However, Airbnb has voiced its concern and said that regulations that stop property owners from exploiting the system would be more appropriate, stating further that the proposed bill would just be taking money out of the pockets of New Yorkers.

“It’s baffling to us in this time of economic inequality that folks would be looking to impose fines of as much as $7,500 on a middle-class person looking to use the home that they live in to help make ends meet,” said Chris Lehane, Airbnb’s head of global policy.

Airbnb has faced regulatory obstacles for years now. In the past, several state agencies had called on the company to make the names of hosts available. An...

Article Image

Consumers to get refunds for delayed airline baggage under new federal rules

A new set of regulations passed by the Obama administration will come as welcome news to air travelers who feel they’ve been nickeled and dimed by excessive fees.

Announced on Wednesday, the new consumer protection rules will guarantee refunds on baggage fees if an airline delays returning luggage after a flight.

Additionally, airliners will be charged with more accurately reporting on-time arrival rates, the number of bungled wheelchair requests, and the rate of lost or mishandled baggage. The new regulations are meant to fulfill the administration’s promise of imposing tougher consumer protections on the airline industry.

“The travel community is grateful that the administration continue to shine a light on many of the more frustrating issues that ail the air travel experience in the U.S.” said Roger Dow, chief executive of travel industry trade group U.S. Travel Assn.

Airline industry pushes back

The changes are meant to provide travelers with a better sense of how well an airliner operates when it comes to factors like handling baggage and being on time, but the industry says that too many regulations may hurt performance.

“Efforts designed to re-regulate how airlines distribute their products and services are bad for airline customers, employees, the communities we serve and our overall U.S. economy,” stated Nicholas Calio, president and chief executive of Airlines for America.

Industry officials point out that airlines are already required by the Department of Transportation to reimburse customers if their bag is lost. Under the new regulations, they would also have to pay customers if luggage is “substantially delayed,” but what the threshold for this term is hasn’t been defined, they say.

Airlines aren’t the only ones subject to the new rules, though. The regulations also provide provisions for online travel agents, who must disclose to fliers if they have a bias based on financial arrangements for offering flights tied to a certain airline.

The new reporting provisions of the regulations are meant to take effect on January 1, 2018, with the rest of the rules slated to be enacted 30 days after changes are published in the Federal Register.

A new set of regulations passed by the Obama administration will come as welcome news to air travelers who feel they’ve been nickeled and dimed by excessiv...

Article Image

How to pack food for your airline flight

Travel is not only exhilarating, it can also be physically taxing. Your body must adjust to different time zones, exercise routines, sleep disruption, fatigue, and diet.

While all of these changes impact our health and well-being, I find diet causes me the most trouble. Maintaining a healthy diet on the road isn’t easy and air travel is a contributing factor.

Airlines rarely feed their coach passengers and the snacks and food they sell onboard is limited. Airports sometimes have good food outlets, but you can’t depend on it. Carrying or locating healthy foods that don’t require refrigeration is a challenge.

A lunch bag solution

I tried a freezable lunch bag on my recent trip. It has a freezable gel liner built right into the lunch bag that you place in the freezer overnight for 12 hours, as per instructions.

After my bag was frozen, I packed it with sliced fresh peaches and mango, a homemade turkey sandwich with lettuce and tomato, and I tucked napkins and a plastic spoon and fork in the outside pocket.

The frozen lunch bag made it through the TSA checkpoint without any problem and once inside, I added a yogurt parfait and a chilled bottle of water.

The lunch bag I chose (they come in different sizes with many pattern/color options) had a strap and could be worn over the shoulder, but I tucked mine in my tote bag. It kept my food cool for ten hours and for the first time, I was fully satisfied on my flight and felt raring to go when I reached my destination.

TSA guidelines on food

You are permitted to carry meat, fish, vegetables and other non-liquid food items in your carry-on. The TSA guidelines state: “If the food is packed with ice or ice packs in a cooler or other container, the ice or ice packs must be completely frozen when brought through screening. If the ice or ice packs are partially melted and have any liquid at the bottom of the container, they will not be permitted.”

As a precaution you may still be subjected to additional screening or not allowed through a checkpoint if your items “trigger an alarm during the screening process, appear to have been tampered with, or pose other security concerns. The final decision rests with TSA on whether to allow any items on the plane.”

Foods to take onboard

There are a variety of healthy options that do not require refrigeration, including:  fresh fruits, dried fruits, nuts, trail mixes, nut butter sandwiches, whole grain crackers, and pretzels. If you purchase sandwiches, yogurt, and salads at the airport, they require refrigeration and should be eaten shortly after takeoff.

I was so happy with my freezable lunch bag that I purchased several different sizes. Healthy options I’ll pack in it include: cut up raw vegetables, sliced fruits, peeled and sectioned citrus, lowfat cheeses and whole grain crackers, and homemade sandwiches. I enjoy yogurt and yogurt parfaits and with the freezable lunch bag, I can eat them any time during my flight.

Whatever you choose to do, a cache of wholesome food choices will make your flight more pleasant and help you to feel invigorated upon arrival, ready to enjoy your travels.

Travel is not only exhilarating, it can also be physically taxing. Your body must adjust to different time zones, exercise routines, sleep disruption, fati...

Article Image

Long airport security lines may soon return, TSA warns

Consumers may remember with dread how long airport security lines were this past spring. The problem got so bad that lawmakers greenlighted a TSA effort to hire more than 700 employees to get things moving at a reasonable pace.

While the stagnation eventually subsided, TSA officials are concerned that the long lines may return in October. TSA Chief Peter Neffenger stated that the agency may need to make job cuts if Congress isn’t able to come together on a new budget.

The cuts would result from a larger government shutdown that would occur on October 1, the beginning of the 2017 fiscal year. TSA took big steps in the summer to reverse the bad conditions during the spring. The agency hired 1,400 new security officers and converted 2,000 part-time workers to full-time positions.

However, Congress’ failure to create a cohesive budget would put the agency back in the position it was in during the spring. Neffenger was quoted as saying that TSA’s new staff would “all go home on October 1st,” if Congress fails to act.

Congressional leaders have not been able to work out a new budget deal for the coming fiscal year thus far, but there are some positive signs. President Obama expressed “modest” hopes of a resolved budget before the October 1 deadline, and Neffenger went so far as to say that the TSA was receiving “good signals” and “strong support” from the administration.

Consumers may remember with dread how long airport security lines were this past spring. The problem got so bad that lawmakers greenlighted a TSA effort to...

Article Image

Gridlock on the tarmac

Going nowhere fast. That's what happened on some of the nation's airport runways during July.

Airlines reported 11 tarmac delays of more than three hours on domestic flights and 10 delays of more than four hours on international flights in July. All are being investigated by the Department of Transportation (DOT).

Additionally, the government received 1,963 consumer complaints about airline service. While that's a decline of 9.4% from the same time a year ago, it's up 31.6% from June 2016.

The DOT's Air Travel Consumer Report includes information on on-time performance, cancellations, chronically delayed flights, and the causes of such delays. Also included are statistics on mishandled baggage reports, oversales, and information about the number of animals that died, were injured, or were lost during air transport in.

The full report is available on the DOT website.

Going nowhere fast. That's what happened on some of the nation's airport runways during July.Airlines reported 11 tarmac delays of more than three hour...

Article Image

What you can and can't take on an airplane

The Samsung Galaxy Note 7 is just the latest item you shouldn't pack in a checked bag aboard a commercial airline in the U.S.

“In light of recent incidents and concerns raised by Samsung about its Galaxy Note 7 devices, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) strongly advises passengers not to turn on or charge these devices on board aircraft and not to stow them in any checked baggage,” the agency said in a brief statement.

Samsung has recalled the Note 7, its flagship smartphone that was introduced only last month. The recall was prompted by more than 30 cases of the phone's battery overheating and catching fire. Anything with a chance of starting a fire is frowned upon at 30,000 feet.

Allowed but regulated

The FAA says there are a number of things that are fine on the ground but not in an enclosed space in the air. Others are tightly regulated. Lithium batteries – the kind that power cordless devices like phones and laptop computers are one example. But so is an aerosol can of whipped cream. Both examples are considered hazardous materials and dangerous goods, but are allowed under certain conditions.

“These products may seem harmless; however, when transported by air they can be very dangerous,” the agency explains on its website. “Vibrations, static electricity, and temperature and pressure variations can cause items to leak, generate toxic fumes, start a fire, or even explode.”

The FAA's list of hazardous materials includes the obvious, like explosives, gases, flammable liquids and solids, and radioactive materials.

Consult the list

But passengers should consult the FAA's list to find exceptions to the rules. For example, most aerosol cans are banned from checked bags but not all. Sun block sprays are allowed.

Not all batteries are prohibited either. Small gel cell and absorbed electrolyte batteries for portable electronics can be packed in checked bags. Battery powered e-cigarettes can be carried on but can't be packed in checked bags.

Many consumer personal electronic devices containing batteries are allowed in carry-on and checked baggage. Examples include dry cell batteries including lithium metal and lithium ion batteries for consumer electronics. Spare dry cell batteries are also permitted.

While the list of permitted and banned items is extensive, the FAA warns that it is not complete. The agency's advice? When in doubt, leave it out.

As for the Note 7, Samsung has said it will replace all the phones sold so far, but first must come up with one that isn't a fire hazard. That could take a little time. In the meantime, airline passengers who use Note 7s must keep them out of checked bags and turn them off when they board an airliner.

The Samsung Galaxy Note 7 is just the latest item you shouldn't pack in a checked bag aboard a commercial airline in the U.S.“In light of recent incide...

Article Image

Flying over the holidays? Book early

Aside from last spring's huge security bottlenecks at some airports and a computer outage or two, airline passengers have had a pretty good 2016.

Ticket prices are 6% lower than last year, but consumers who plan to fly during the holiday period need to prepare for higher costs and limited seats. At least, that's the assessment from Dean Headley, Airline Quality Rating (AQR) co-author and associate professor of marketing at Wichita State University.

Headley says demand for airline seats has been strong throughout the year, a product of a slowly improving economy. But prices tend to rise during the holiday travel period and Headley says consumers need to take that into consideration.

Book earlier than normal

He expects demand to be even stronger this year than in 2015. Book earlier than you normally would, he says, to ensure your travel plans. And don't overlook fees.

"Ticket prices may appear to be reasonable to slightly lower, but when the fees hit you, you truly feel that the overall cost of travel has gone up," said Headley.

In fact, the cost of air travel is going up, but airlines compete for passengers by posting the lowest fares. But the fare is not the bottom line cost of a ticket.

"A year ago the average price was $375, but with $75 in fees for bags and seat assignments, that ticket seems noticeably more expensive,” Headley said.

If you are traveling with family members, those fees can quickly raise the cost of air travel. Headley says at some point, consumers need to decide whether getting there by air is worth the cost and the hassle. And make no mistake, there will be hassle during the holidays.

Things that can go wrong

All it will take is for a major snowstorm to sock a wide area of the eastern U.S., or for an airline computer system to suffer a glitch, and holiday air travel can become a nightmare. Despite improving performance as an industry, the travel experience for consumers has become more stressful and uncertain, especially during the holiday travel period.

"During the past several years, the holiday travel period has continued to be a challenging time for travelers, and with industrywide seat capacity adjustments, the possibility of bad weather and possible system outages, it will remain a stressful travel experience," said Headley.

Travelers may also face additional challenges due to the continued consolidation in the airline industries. When two airlines become one, consumer choices usually shrink. Headley says Alaska merging with Virgin America, United with Continental, Southwest with AirTran, and American Airlines with US Airways, has continued to change consumers' available options, as well as affect airline performance.

Sticking with airlines that have a good performance track record can improve your odds of trouble-free holiday flights. According to Headley, last year's best-performing airlines were Virgin America, JetBlue, Delta, and Hawaiian.

Hawaiian was best in getting there on time. JetBlue was best in avoiding overbooking. Virgin America was best in baggage handling. Alaska had the lowest rate of customer complaints.

Aside from last spring's huge security bottlenecks at some airports and a computer outage or two, airline passengers have had a pretty good 2016.Ticket...

Article Image

How baggage fees improved airline performance

The nation's airlines have gone from economic basket cases to profitable enterprises since the end of the Great Recession, thanks in large part to baggage fees.

Airlines, with the notable exception of Southwest, now charge extra to check a bag. Consumers hate it, but there's an interesting study that suggests this move not only helped airlines' bottom line, it has helped them leave the gate on time.

Here's how: because passengers hate paying these fees, they avoid checking bags if possible and instead drag as much carry-on luggage as they can on board. While that may be annoying to fellow passengers, Mazhar Arikan, a University of Kansas business school professor, notes it reduces the time needed for ground crews to stow checked luggage aboard the aircraft.

"Because passengers changed their behavior, less weight went into the plane below the cabin," he said. "This offset any changes in carry-on luggage, and it helped airlines improve their on-time departure performance. The below-the-cabin effect dominates the above-the-cabin effect."

Up to four minutes earlier

Arikan and his fellow researchers found airlines improved their median departure time between 3.3 to 4.2 minutes. Departure delays declined 1.3 to two minutes. The deciding factor, the researchers found was whether an airline charged for the first or second checked bag.

The changes even spilled over to Southwest, which does not charge for the first two checked bags. The researchers suggest that's because baggage fees in general have created a cultural shift – passengers are now geared toward less checked luggage and more carry-on bags, regardless of what airline they are flying.

Lost opportunity costs

That said, the research shows Southwest's performance did not improve as much as its fee-charging rivals, hurting one of the carrier's historical competitive advantages. Arikan goes so far as to argue Southwest's “Bags Fly Free” policy is actually costing the carrier in lost opportunity, since he says the airline could be offering more flights each day.

All in all, Arikan says it's a unique way of looking at the whole issue of checked bag fees. Previous research, he notes, has focused solely on the economic effects of the checked bag fees.

The researchers contend the time fluctuations are significant because departure times and mitigating delays are critical indicators of performance. They can also affect the number of flights airlines can offer and their image among potential customers.

The nation's airlines have gone from economic basket cases to profitable enterprises since the end of the Great Recession, thanks in large part to baggage...

Article Image

Delta reveals new suites for business class passengers

Recently, airlines have been trying to think up new ways to squeeze more passengers on flights. Back in March, United Airlines said it would be adding one additional seat to every row in coach on some of its planes. Moves like this have irked many consumers who think that there isn’t enough room to go around on flights already.

Now, in a surprising reversal, Delta Air Lines has announced that it will be providing “suites” to passengers who want to pay for more privacy. The company says that its new Airbus A350 jets will have 32 of these new spaces located in business class.

Each suite comes equipped with a host of amenities, including a full-height door, sliding privacy dividers, customizable ambient lighting, personal stowage spaces, an 18-inch entertainment monitor, universal power outlets, and a high-powered USB port.

Customers looking to sleep through the flight are also in luck. The seats located in these suites will be able to fully recline, making a sort of makeshift bed.

“Delta constantly listens to customers and responds with products that deliver what they want. After setting the standard with the introduction of full flat-bed seats with direct aisle access in 2008, Delta is again elevating the international business class experience,” said Delta Senior Vice President and Chief Marketing Officer Tim Mapes.

The new Delta One suites are scheduled to debut in the fall of 2017.

Recently, airlines have been trying to think up new ways to squeeze more passengers on flights. Back in March, United Airlines said it would be adding one ...

Article Image

Southwest technical outage could cost it up to $84 million

Last month, Southwest Airlines experienced a technological glitch that led to havoc in terminals across the country. The airliner ended up canceling 2,300 flights, with many unhappy air travelers being stranded away from home.

Delta Airlines, meanwhile, continues to suffer the slings and arrows of outraged travelers over its tech meltdown earlier this week. 

Now, the Dallas Morning News reports that Southwest’s tech outage could cost it millions of dollars. All told, estimates place the losses between $54 million and $82 million.

Millions in losses

The estimate was calculated using information from Southwest about its unit revenues and the amount of money it spent in reparations to travelers at the time of the outage. On Wednesday, the company told investors that the tech outage would lead to a 0.5% drop in unit revenues for the third quarter. Additionally, it said that the cost per seat mile would be going up between one and two percent.

While the percentages were not translated to a specific dollar amount, experts have estimated that the lost revenue from refunded tickets, missed bookings, and canceled flights would come out to around $25.7 million.

However, the losses extend far beyond that amount. The outage required the company to spend more money on staff overtime, transportation, and accommodations for stranded travelers as well. Experts put those costs between $28 million and $57 million, which means the company could stand to lose as much as $82 million when all is said and done.

Sympathizers shouldn’t feel too bad for Southwest, though. Despite last month’s loss of revenue, the company still stands to make many times more than that over the course of the year. Last year, Southwest raked in $20 billion in annual revenue.

Delta technical outage draws heat

Southwest isn't alone. Delta Airlines experienced an outage at its Atlanta headquarters this past week that led to over a thousand canceled and delayed flights. The effects of the outage spilled over into subsequent days, with hundreds of flights being canceled after the error was corrected.

Consumer advocacy groups Travelers United and FlyersRights have voiced their displeasure in an open letter to Delta CEO Ed Bastien, saying that the blame for travelers’ suffering should be placed squarely on the airline.

“Your airline should realize that these cancellations and delays are the fault of Delta Air Lines alone. Passengers should not be punished for Delta’s incompetence,” the letter states. “Families have missed weddings, organized tours and cruises. Businessman have missed meetings. And, many others have been faced with financial repercussions because of Delta’s technology failure.”

The groups call on Delta to make reparations to travelers, including full refunds or free and flexible rescheduled flights.

“Passengers wishing to travel on the airline shouldn’t be restricted by arbitrary time constraints and should be allowed to rebook on their timetable – not Delta’s. Delta should not hide behind pages of legalese. Full compensation or free, flexible rebooking for missed flights and ruined travel plans is what’s fair and right,” the groups said.

Last month, Southwest Airlines experienced a technological glitch that led to havoc in terminals across the country. The airliner ended up canceling 2,300 ...

Article Image

Delta's system is back up but more flights are cancelled

The power outage that took down Delta Airlines' entire computer system Monday, forcing the cancellation of about 1,000 flights, has been repaired.

But the airline said the residual effect has spilled over to Tuesday and will force cancellation of another 250 flights.

"We were able to bring our systems back on line and resume flights within a few hours yesterday but we are still operating in recovery mode,” said Dave Holtz, Senior Vice President – Operations and Customer Center. “We are sorry for what many of our customers have experienced over the past 24 hours, including those who remain at airports and continue waiting for their flights. We are doing everything we can to return our operation to normal reliability, but we do expect additional delays and cancellations.”

Important to check schedules

Delta said customers traveling Tuesday should check the status of their flight at delta.com or the Fly Delta App. If they need to, passengers can rebook their flights online.

Additionally, Delta's travel waiver has been extended to Tuesday's travelers. The airline is also handing out $200 travel vouchers to all customers who experienced cancelled flights or a delay of greater than three hours due to the outage. The vouchers are available for travel on all Delta and Delta Connection-operated flights.

You'll find details here.

Check out our earlier coverage of Delta's computer system failure and flight cancellations here.

The power outage that took down Delta Airlines' entire computer system Monday, forcing the cancellation of about 1,000 flights, has been repaired.But t...

Article Image

Delta computer outage throws schedules up in the air

Air travelers are starting the week with a complication that could affect timely arrivals at their destinations.

Delta Airlines experienced a computer outage at its Atlanta headquarters early Monday morning, and as a result its computerized check-in kiosks were disabled at airports around the world. Passengers attempting to use them were instructed to see a Delta ticket agent for a boarding pass.

At midday, Delta said flights had resumed but said 451 flights had been canceled and many others delayed. It is expected to take days for the carrier's flight schedule to return to normal. 

Delta CEO Ed Bastian apologized to customers and said that airline employees are working "all hands on deck" to bring flight schedule back to normal. "While systems are improving and flights are resuming, delays and cancellations continue," Delta said in a statement.

It's the second major airline to experience a meltdown because of computer problems in recent weeks. Southwest canceled thousands of flights last month because of what was said to be a failed router at its Dallas Love Field headquarters, leaving consumer groups to question how well the airlines have thought through the concept of redundancy.

Problem "of Delta's making"

"It is hard for Travelers United to understand how a major airline does not have a backup system for their worldwide reservations network. One of the first things anyone working with computers learns is to backup data," said Charles Leocha of Travelers United, an advocacy group for travelers.

Unfortunately, said Leocha, passengers' options are limited.

"When Delta cancels a flight, passengers are entitled to a full refund. However, passengers in the middle of a trip are at the mercy of the airlines and its ability to move them to to other airlines and its capacity to handle passengers on future flights," he said. 

Delta said it was waiving change and cancellation fees ranging from $200 to $500 and said that affected flights must be reissued on or before August 12, 2016 (Friday). Also, rebooked travel must begin no later than Friday.

If Delta flights from the European Union to the US are delayed for more than three hours, passengers are eligible for €600 (about $660) in compensation.

"Travelers United urges Delta to allow passengers up to a year from the date of cancellation to use their airline ticket funds. Forcing passengers to change their dates of travel and upend their lives because of a Delta mishap is unreasonable," Leocha said. "This is a problem completely of Delta’s making, not the fault of passengers. Remedies should recognize Delta’s culpability and not restrict consumer rights or force them pay additional airfare or fees."

In a statement Monday morning, Delta warned passengers that “large-scale cancellations” are expected throughout the day.

“All flights enroute are operating normally,” the statement said. “We are aware that flight status systems, including airport screens, are incorrectly showing flights on time. We apologize to customers who are affected by this issue, and our teams are working to resolve the problem as quickly as possible.”

Hand-written boarding passes

Not only are there long lines at Delta ticket counters, the computer glitch means that boarding passes are being written out by hand. That makes it difficult to board planes on time, which the airline expects will result in delays and flight cancellations.

That, of course, can be expected to impact passengers on other airlines if they are connecting with a Delta flight to get to their destinations.

Delta has issued a waiver for consumers traveling on the airline from August 8 through August 12.

If your flight is canceled or significantly delayed, you will be able to get a refund. Even if your flight is not canceled, you may make a one-time change to your ticket without fee if you are scheduled to travel over the next five days.

Delta passengers can get the latest information from the airline here.

Air travelers are starting the week with a complication that could affect timely arrivals at their destinations.Delta Airlines experienced a computer o...

Article Image

Spirit flips its rewards program in August -- gives more points for less spending

Major airlines have been fiddling with their rewards programs, changing them to award points based on spending rather than miles. Budget carrier Spirit Airlines is taking a different tack in August -- awarding more miles to those who spend less.

“We want to fly in the face of changing loyalty programs and reward customers for saving money, not spending it,” Bobby Schroeter, Spirit’s vice president of consumer marketing, said. It's called the “Save More, Get More” promotion.

Throughout August, Free Spirit members will earn 1,000 bonus miles for flights in which the base fare is $75 or less. Spirit will award 500 bonus miles for flights that cost between $76 and $125. The ultra-low-cost carrier will award 125 bonus miles to those who purchase tickets that cost between $126 and $150.

The bonuses are increased to 2,500 miles, 1000 miles and 500 miles, respectively, for members of Spirit’s $9 Fare Club.

The bonus miles will be awarded on top of the normal Free Spirit miles that members earn for a flight. Free Spirit members are awarded one mile for every two miles that they fly, while elite members are awarded on a mile-for-mile basis.

Interested participants can visit here to register for the campaign and book a flight.

Major airlines have been fiddling with their rewards programs, changing them to award points based on spending rather than miles. Budget carrier Spirit Air...

Article Image

Southwest Airlines pilots demand ouster of CEO

Southwest Airlines pilots are calling for the resignation of CEO Gary Kelly, blaming him for the tech meltdown that left the airline in shambles for days last month. The pilots were joined by the mechanics of the Aircraft Mechanics Fraternal Association.

“As tenured employees and frontline leaders of this company, we can no longer sit idly by and watch poor decision after poor decision deeply affect our customers and Southwest Airlines," Capt. Jon Weaks, president of the Southwest Airline Pilots Association, said in a prepared statement after the union's board voted 20-0 to approve a no-confidence vote in Kelly.

Weaks said Kelly and Chief Operating Officer Mike Van de Ven have a "misguided focus on cost control" that has caused "years of operational deficiencies, unprecedented labor strife, and continued culture erosion at the company."

"We believe that a change is needed for the best interests of Southwest Airlines and the loyal customers we serve," the union said and urged the Southwest board to replace both top executives.

A lone router

Kelly maintains that the July 20th outage was caused by the failure of a lone router at the airline's Love Field data center in Dallas. 

The router, like the thousands of others in the data center, had a backup system in place. But Kelly said the "unique" way the router failed, what he described as a "partial failure," didn't signal the backup that it was needed, allowing a singular disruption to metastasize into a crisis, the Dallas Morning News reported.

Kelly compared it to a once-in-a-thousand-years flood. "In 45 years, we've never had a challenge like this one," Kelly said.

But Weaks said that under Kelly's management, "there has been an inability to prioritize the expenditure of record-breaking revenues toward investments in critically outdated IT infrastructure and flight operations" and said those "decisions have directly lead to the operational failure at Midway Airport in January 2014, chaotic crew scheduling during the summers and holidays of 2014-2016, and our most recent 'meltdown' related to technological infrastructure this past month."

The glitch caused the cancellation of 2,300 flights, stranding hundreds of thousands of consumers and costing Southwest tens of millions of dollars. 

Southwest Airlines pilots are calling for the resignation of CEO Gary Kelly, blaming him for the tech meltdown that left the airline in shambles for days l...

Article Image

Why Wall Street hates the airlines' more consumer-friendly policies

Oil prices have been low for a couple of years now, and among the beneficiaries have been the nation's airlines.

With lower fuel costs, airlines have added capacity, gotten more competitive on fares, and brought back a few creature comforts. But while consumers might approve of the changes, Wall Street investors certainly don't.

In the Bizarro World of Wall Street, just about everything that is good for consumers – low gasoline prices, for example – is seen as bad for business. As far as Wall Street is concerned, companies that can extract the highest profit margins from consumers are to be valued. Companies that give consumers a break are to be avoided, since it is assumed they will be less profitable.

Airline stocks getting pounded

Currently, investors are punishing airlines. When airlines imposed baggage fees – and fees for just about everything else – and cut capacity, Wall Street cheered. Less competition meant airlines could charge more. Again, bad for consumers but good for business.

TheStreet.com reports investors are currently punishing Southwest Airlines over its refusal to impose baggage fees; it's the only major airline that doesn't charge for checking a bag. The airline has thus far also refused to trim its capacity, which would allow it to charge more for tickets.

The airline recently said it expects revenue per available seat mile to go down a bit in the current quarter.

Lower profits at American

American Airlines, meanwhile, is also suffering from lower profits. But Fortune Magazine points out many airlines are slashing fares as an offensive move, to keep smaller discount carriers from making inroads during a period of rock bottom fuel costs.

Still, Wall Street doesn't like it one bit.

“All told, the Big Four––American, Delta, United Continental, and Southwest—have shed almost $30 billion in market cap since March, a full 25% of their value,” Fortune reports. “That’s big change from just a few years ago when airlines stocks were soaring.”

The business publication concludes that airlines are destined to return to their more competitive past, with smaller profit margins and lower stock prices. It might not be good for investors, but it might work out just fine for consumers.  

Oil prices have been low for a couple of years now, and among the beneficiaries have been the nation's airlines.With lower fuel costs, airlines have ad...

Article Image

Airline baggage fees must be refunded if bags are delayed, according to new law

It’s not an uncommon story – your flight touches down at its final destination, but your baggage didn’t make it in time for the connecting flight. It’s a major source of frustration for frequent fliers, who pay good money to make sure their belongings arrive in a timely fashion.

In order to address this problem -- at least partially -- a new law has been passed this month that requires airlines to refund baggage fees if bags are delayed, according to an Atlanta Journal Constitution report. The law is intended to make getting a refund easier for consumers, who otherwise may need to jump through hoops for remuneration.

U.S. Senator John Thune remarked that “passengers won’t have to spend a ton of time tracking down a refund when the airline doesn’t deliver.”

Consumers should be especially happy about this law considering the amount of money they spend to check their bags. U.S. airlines made a combined $900 million off of baggage fees in the first quarter of 2016; American Airlines led the way with $262.5 million in baggage fees, with Delta in second place at $197.7 million.

The new regulation stipulates that airlines “promptly provide to a passenger an automated refund for any ancillary fees paid by the passenger for checked baggage” if it doesn’t arrive within 12 hours of its intended arrival time. International flights will have slightly more leeway with a 15-hour timeframe.

Passengers looking to take advantage of the new rule will only need to notify the airline of any lost or delayed baggage, a change from having to fill out online rebate forms that may only give a travel voucher. The U.S. Secretary of Transportation has been asked to officially issue the new regulation within a year.

The refund requirement is part of the FAA Reauthorization Act of 2016.

It’s not an uncommon story – your flight touches down at its final destination, but your baggage didn’t make it in time for the connecting flight. It’s a m...

Article Image

Southwest cancels hundreds of flights after computer glitch

Sometimes computer problems are pretty simple, like when the dog steps on your power strip and turns it off. But no matter what the cause may be, technology glitches can take a heavy toll, as Southwest Airlines passengers were reminded Wednesday when unexplained problems hit the discount carrier's network.

Customers were unable to check in for flights and gate agents had to manually issue boarding passes while the system was offline, causing many flights to be delayed and, in many cases, canceled.

"As a result of the technical issues we canceled nearly 700 flights Wednesday and hundreds more were delayed. Employees worked around issues with primary systems and utilized back-up procedures to get as many customers and checked luggage to their intended destinations as we worked to fix the system," Southwest said in a statement late Wednesday.

Not all consumers were satisfied with the airline's efforts. "Rather than offer all delayed travelers the usual compensation, they are in fact offering flights that later get canceled as well (bogus flights). Computer glitch or not, what they are doing is wrong. You don't promise to rebook and than cancel that flight as well," Michael of Midvale, Utah, said in a ConsumerAffairs review.

"A simple one-hour flight turned into delays due to their systems failing, a 40-minute wait sitting on the flight line and another hour wait for bags," said Joshua of Cameron, N.C. 

220 Thursday flights

The carrier said that most systems were back online Thursday morning, but at least 220 Thursday flights were canceled and delays continued to ripple through the system.

"We are focused on getting customers and their luggage safely to their travel destinations and apologize to our customers whose travel plans are impacted," Southwest said. It advised consumers who are booked to travel to check flight status information on Southwest.com and plan to arrive to the airport early, as long lines may occur. It said flexible rebooking accommodation will be available through Sunday. 

"It's never too early to say thank you and to extend our apologies and we want to share those sentiments both with our hard-working employees and our loyal and understanding customers," Southwest concluded.

Sometimes computer problems are pretty simple, like when the dog steps on your power strip and turns it off. But no matter what the cause may be, technolog...

Article Image

Airline failed to protect unaccompanied child, lawsuit alleges

Airlines are eager to charge extra fees for unaccompanied minors, but parents often question the treatment their children receive. In an extreme example, an irate father has sued American Airlines for $10 million, alleging it let a drunken man sexually abuse his 13-year-old daughter.

The father, identified in the federal report as R.M., also names Chad Cameron Camp, who was arrested when the flight landed. R.M. says he paid a $300 "unaccompanied minor" fee for his daughter, as the airline requires, when she flew from Dallas to Portland June 15.

But instead of looking after his daughter, R.M. says the airline seated her in a window seat and put Camp next to her, even though he allegedly was drunk and muttering obscenities, Courthouse News Service reported.

A flight attendant asked Camp if he would like to move to a different row and he said no, but no one asked R.M.'s daughter -- M.W. -- if she wanted to move, the suit alleges.   

"Almost immediately, and without intervention from American, Camp began to rub up against M.W., lean close to her and fondle her body with his hand. This groping eventually progressed to Camp touching her upper and lower leg and finally to her crotch. ... This horrendous set of events lasted approximately thirty (30) minutes without American's intervention," the suit charges.

Flight attendants finally intervened when they noticed a tear falling from M.W.'s cheek. They moved M.W. to the front of the plane and moved Camp to the back and had him arrested when the plane landed, according to the report.

Ignored for 7.5 hours

While M.W.'s case is extreme, it is far from the only instance of unaccompanied children being left to fend for themselves despite their parents forking over $150 per flight. 

Consumers rate American Airlines

Marina of Brookside, Pa., sent her 11-year-old son on a flight to France, trusting that the airline would look after him. 

"My son sat on the plane for 7 1/2 hours, and no one told him specifically that he could get up and go to the bathroom. And they took his carry-on bag and never gave it back to him till the end of the flight. That had entertainment and his passport documents," she said in a recent ConsumerAffairs review.

"He was supposed to have an assigned flight attendant introduce herself. That never happened. Also, they would have never escorted him down the jetway if I had not said something about him walking down alone," she said. "One flight attendant told him to 'just stay calm' when he started crying. How do you feel ok treating a child like that? My son told me that none of the flight attendants tried to make him comfortable."

Bumped and accused

Zorica of Ft. Lauderdale said her child was allowed to "wander around the airport" with no supervision and Julia of Allen, Texas, said her son was bumped from a flight, then accused of being intoxicated.

"Unaccompanied minor was stranded at airport and held against his will, sequestered, not allowed to make or receive phone calls to his family and therefore falsely imprisoned by AA personnel for several hours," she said. "They tried to arrange for a hotel voucher for the child, they also falsely accused him of being intoxicated and gave him a breathylyzer test -- then lied to me his parent about the whole incident."

It's not just American that earns parents' wrath, of course. Lee of Black Mountain, N.C., learned this when arranging for his 14-year-old stepdaughter to travel from Nashville to Tampa on United. 

"I booked a ticket for my 14-year-old stepdaughter. ... I researched United's policy on minors (Children ages 12 to 17 have the option to pay the fee and use the unaccompanied minor service or they may travel as adults with no unaccompanied minor service provided) and even called to book the reservation with an agent just to be doubly sure," Lee said.

"On March 28th, my stepdaughter arrived at the airport to get onto her flight and the agent would not let her on the plane. They refused to honor the ticket and refused to book her on another flight. She was stuck at the airport and denied a flight," Lee recalled. "When asked why, the agent said that they contract US Airways to fly that United flight and US Airways had a different policy with regards to children."

"I needed to book an on-the-spot flight on another airline (Southwest, which by the way was super wonderful in all ways)," Lee said. Several other parents had good things to say about Southwest, and Delta got both thorns and roses in the reviews we looked at.

"I was told by two different Delta agents that I paid for an unaccompanied minor's fee on my son's ticket. The day he is flying, they claim I never paid the fee and now he is flying all alone and will have get his own suitcases! How can two Delta agents make the same error?" M. of Country Club Hills, Ill., said in her review of her Delta experience.

On the other hand, Sylvia of Roseburg, Ore., recalled the day her children flew unaccompanied from Eugene, Oregon to Tampa.

"Eric, the agent at the check in counter, was absolutely exceptional. He was professional and knew his job. I watched him the entire process even up to boarding. I was amazed on how he handled himself with such a busy and hectic job. He didn't show one sign of stress," Sylvia said. "Thank you for making a hard goodbye easy for my kids and I."

Airlines are eager to charge extra fees for unaccompanied minors, but parents often question the treatment their children receive. In an extreme example, a...

Article Image

JetBlue offers free TSA PreCheck to its most-frequent fliers

JetBlue is offering to cover the cost of enrolling in TSA Precheck for its most-frequent fliers, in an effort to reduce wait times at airport security checkpoints. The offer applies to Mosaic TrueBlue members, the airline's highest frequent flier tier.

“Reducing time and the complexity of the security checkpoint makes a big difference for travelers, especially those who are always on their way to catch a flight,” said Scott Resnick, director, loyalty marketing, JetBlue. “[B]y helping the TSA facilitate more fliers in the TSA Precheck lane, we can also speed up the security for all customers.”

The limited-time offer comes as the Department of Homeland Security warns that it will be stepping up security over the July 4th holiday, in response to the terrorist attack at the Istanbul airport that killed 42 people in Turkey.

Extra patrols have been deployed at several major U.S. airports this week, while the TSA has already increased the number of bomb-sniffing dog teams in the wake of the Brussels airport terrorist attack in March.

Shoes on

TSA Precheck helps travelers move efficiently though security by leaving their shoes, belt and light outerwear on, and in most cases keeping their laptop computers and 3-1-1 compliant liquids and gels in their carry-on bag.

TrueBlue members with Mosaic status who currently do not have a Known Traveler Number listed in their loyalty program profile will receive an email from JetBlue by July 1 with a special promotional award code that can be redeemed for a TSA Precheck voucher.

The offer is valid for TrueBlue members who earned Mosaic status before June 30, 2016 and codes are valid for redemption through September 30, 2016, the airline said.

JetBlue is offering to cover the cost of enrolling in TSA Precheck for its most-frequent fliers, in an effort to reduce wait times at airport security chec...

Article Image

Spirit Airlines trying to improve its on-time performance

Spirit Airlines is sort of the airline people love to hate for all kinds of reasons. New CEO Bob Fornaro hopes to remedy at least one of those reasons -- its poor ontime record. 

Spirit flights operated on time only 68 percent of the time for the year ended April 2016, a dismal record Fornaro hopes to remedy. In a Bloomberg interview, Fornaro said he has instituted bonuses for managers who keep things moving in a timely manner.

He noted that Spirit had an on-time record of 73.8 percent in April, five points up from its year-long average. That's still the worst in the U.S. airline industry and nearly 11 percentage points below average, according to U.S. Department of Transportation figures.

“Over the years, we’ve never put enough emphasis on service,” Fornaro said in a June 20 interview with Bloomberg editors, vowing that things would be changing quickly.

"On our own"

That was just about when a New Jersey lawyer found out his Spirit flight back to New York from New Orleans had been canceled. "They didn't give us a reason and said they wouldn't be able to find us a seat on any flights," he said. "We were on our own."

News reports that day said some flights into the New York area were delayed by high winds but the lawyer booked a full-fare flight on JetBlue, which landed on time at New York's JFK International. The lawyer's car was at LaGuardia, where he had hoped Spirit would drop him. That added an expensive cab ride to the trip.  

Consumers rate Spirit Air

Hundreds of consumers have shared similar incidents in ConsumerAffairs reviews. Anita of Newbury Park, California, had an on-time flight to Jamaica but her return wasn't as punctual.

"Our Jamaica flight was delayed by 4 hours due to mechanical reasons. We were told we could still make our connecting flight in Florida to LA. The flight then got delayed another hour and then all the people that were in the same boat as us gathered around the gate counter to try to figure out what to do. They tried booking us on other flights but there were none until the next morning. We were given hotel vouchers and 1 meal voucher for $7. Then the flight was delayed another hour and more people came to the counter because they were also going to miss their connecting flights," she said.

In the end, she made it home after flying all night from Florida to Chicago to Los Angeles. One positive note: "The crew and staff were very nice and I feel bad that they work for such a poorly managed company."

Simply too expensive

Bloomberg notes in its story that while Spirit may improve its rather dismal on-time record, it is not likely to get into the 90 percent range. That's because it is simply too expensive for a low-fare airline to maintain all the extra crews and equipment necessary to ensure that back-up fights are available when needed.

Hawaiian, Alaska, and Delta are the industry leaders with ratings above 90 percent. All are what might be called "standard" fare carriers. While they offer some discounted seats, their regular fares are much higher than Spirit's.

It comes day to the old saw that sometimes, though not always, you get what you pay for. The attorney who was stranded in New Orleans said he was not on a tight schedule and had decided to take Spirit out of curiosity. 

His flight from LaGuardia consumed an entire day. It left at 8:16 a.m., meandered through Detroit, and landed in New Orleans at 5:16 p.m.

"It was fine for what it was," he said. "Everything, including water, was extra but I understood that going in. "The $236 round-trip fare was more than $200 less than JetBlue had quoted. If saving money is important to you, it's worth putting up with a little inconvenience. If time is valuable, it's worth paying more to consume less ot it."

Spirit Airlines is sort of the airline people love to hate for all kinds of reasons. New CEO Bob Fornaro hopes to remedy at least one of those reasons -- i...

Article Image

More American Airlines rewards to be based on spending, not miles

You can now consider it a travel trend. American Airlines has joined the club, following competitors United and Delta in adjusting its loyalty program to emphasize spending rather than distance.

Starting August 1, points will be awarded based on dollars spent, not on miles traveled.

Last fall American made a similar adjustment to its frequent flyer program. The latest tweak makes all rewards, including minor perks, based on dollars spent.

The new system rewards not only consumers who fly most frequently, but also those who spend the most per ticket. From the airline's point of view, the consumer flying in coach with a super-saver fare should not earn the same rewards as the customer in first class, even though they are flying the same number of miles.

The new system also benefits the consumer who booked at the last minute and, as a result, is paying a higher fare than someone who bought a ticket weeks in advance.

The AAdvantage program, one of the industry's oldest loyalty programs, will also introduce a new elite level in 2017.

“American Airlines is evolving AAdvantage to continue our tradition of having the best loyalty program in the world by rewarding our most loyal customers with the benefits they value the most,” said Andrew Nocella, American’s Chief Marketing Officer.

Earning Award Miles

When travelers begin racking up rewards based on their spending, Elite members will earn even more miles based on their status level.

AAdvantage members will earn five miles per dollar spent, but Gold members will get seven miles. Platinum members will receive eight miles per dollar spent and Executive Platinum will get 11 miles.

The rewards for travel on flights marketed by partner airlines will be based on a percentage of the flight distance and the booking code purchased.

Before the end of this month American customers will be able to go online to view an estimate of their miles and elite credits.

New Elite Level

On January 1, 2017, the AAdvantage program will add a fourth elite level, the Platinum Pro. It will include complimentary upgrades on eligible flights and will earn nine award miles per dollar spent, placing it between the Platinum and Executive Platinum levels. Customers will also get two free checked bags.

Also starting January 1, American says members of the rewards program will be able to reach elite status by reaching the elite qualifying dollars (EQD) threshold, giving customers added flexibility.  

You can now consider it a travel trend. American Airlines has joined the club, following competitors United and Delta in adjusting its loyalty program to e...

Article Image

Communication expert sees some simple fixes for airport delays

The Memorial Day weekend came and went without headlines or viral videos about excessive waits to get through airport security. There were still extended waits at some airports, but nothing like the breakdowns that occurred the previous week.

While things may have temporarily improved, Transportation Security Administration (TSA) officials say there will be no quick and easy fix. TSA, Congress, and the Airlines have blamed one another for the mess and passengers seem to blame all three.

“Blame is great but it doesn’t solve anything,” said Guy McHendry, an assistant professor in the Department of Communication Studies at Creighton University.

A communications expert, McHendry has studied the delays at security checkpoints as a communication issue. He says he's observed several problems.

Failure to communicate

McHendry says TSA has very little communication directed at consumers who rarely travel by air. When confronted with security procedures, their lack of understanding of what is expected from them can slow things down.

He notes that TSA has blamed passengers, in part, for the bottlenecks since they aren't prepared when they reach the checkpoint. But whose fault is that, he asks?

“Seasoned travelers have it down to a science, they do it so regularly,” McHendry said. “But there’s another segment of travelers, arguably a larger segment, that doesn’t fly very often and, therefore, they see security as an interruption and inconvenience and they don’t always understand what it is they’re supposed to do at a checkpoint.”

Things that could help

McHendry says clearer statements of the expectations, better signage, and a cheerful TSA screener walking lines and providing helpful reminders could help move the process along. Better communication, he says, might also reduce the number of prohibited items that show up at checkpoints, contributing to delays.

Finally, McHendry says better TSA internal communication might help morale and slow the turnover of personnel that has contributed to staff shortages.

“TSA has to ask itself why people are leaving and what the impact will be,” he said.

Another possible reason for the security bottlenecks may have its origins in drills conducted late last year. TSA officials carried out a number of operations in which people purposefully tried to get prohibited items through the security lines.

Officials were chagrined to find that it was relatively easy to do. Early this year TSA screeners expanded their screening duties to ensure no banned items made it onto the aircraft.

The Memorial Day weekend came and went without headlines or viral videos about excessive waits to get through airport security. There were still extended w...

Article Image

Summer air travel projected to reach record level

As the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) struggles to screen passengers at the nation's busiest airports, its job may be about to get a lot harder.

And for airline passengers passing through those busy airports, the nightmare may only be beginning.

Airlines for America (A4A), the industry trade group for major U.S. airlines, has issued its summer air travel forecast, projecting this summer's passenger traffic to beat last year's by 4%. And last year was an all-time record.

“We saw airfares fall throughout 2015 and that trend continued in the first three months of 2016,” said John Heimlich, A4A Vice President and Chief Economist. “As airlines compete for passengers across an increasing portfolio of markets, air travel is becoming increasingly affordable and accessible.”

Not exactly good news

That might sound like good news, but it probably isn't. Already the bottlenecks at security check points have sent tempers boiling, as passengers can't get through the lines in time to make their flights.

As Chicago television station WLS reported over the weekend, 450 American Airlines passengers became stranded at O'Hare Airport Sunday when they couldn't get through security in time and the planes left without them.

Airline personnel rounded up hundreds of cots so the stranded passengers could spend the night in the terminal – a scene usually occurring only during a major weather emergency. It could well become a routine occurrence this summer at other busy airports.

A4A expects about 2.51 million passengers a day will book passage on U.S. airlines from June 1 through August 31 – 231 million over the course of the summer. To meet the record demand, it says airlines will offer 2.78 million seats per day.

Quickly optimize staffing

The airlines may be able to accommodate that number, but the real question is whether the TSA's security system can. A4A says TSA should move to “quickly optimize staffing” to reduce boarding wait times.

“Research shows that people who get through security more efficiently have a significantly better travel experience,” said Sharon Pinkerton, A4A Senior Vice President of Legislative and Regulatory Affairs.

Pinkerton notes that spring travel has already proven to be a challenge, with some passengers waiting an hour and a half to get through lines. Some passengers at O'Hare told CNBC that they arrived three hours early, as instructed, only to find the security checkpoint was not staffed during the early morning hours.

TSA says it is working with fewer screeners and has tightened security procedures. Congress last week approved a measure that shifts $34 million in the TSA budget to the hiring and training of additional screeners.  

As the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) struggles to screen passengers at the nation's busiest airports, its job may be about to get a lot hard...

Article Image

Grumbling about airport security delays gets louder

With an improved economy, more consumers are taking to the skies. Air traffic is up in early 2016 and is expected to break records this summer.

As we reported this week, J.D. Power's latest survey shows passengers are more satisfied with the nation's airlines than they have been in the last 10 years. But the survey didn't ask about the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) check-in system.

There, complaints have been mounting, and not just from frustrated passengers. Gizmodo reports that even the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey has taken TSA to task, where wait times at New York area airports reportedly approached an hour during the spring.

Viral YouTube video

Now there's an infamous YouTube Video (below), shot Thursday at Chicago's Midway airport, that purports to show an endless line of passengers waiting to get through the security check point. To say the video has gone viral is something of an understatement – more than a million views in less than 24 hours – so it has apparently touched a nerve.

Please note that the video does contain strong language.

Congress gets on board

If there's one thing that gets Congress' attention and promotes bipartisan action, it's crowded airports and the inability to make a speedy getaway on a Thursday afternoon. This week, lawmakers approved TSA's request to hire more than 700 new screeners and get them in place before the summer.

TSA, meanwhile, is pushing back against some of the criticism, suggesting at least some of the delays at checkpoints could be alleviated if passengers were better prepared when they show up.

In a press release directed at passengers traveling through New York area airports, TSA said the reasons for checkpoint delays include a significant increase in passengers, more people with carry-on bags -- many of which have more than the limit of one carry-on bag and one personal item per passenger, and budget cuts that have reduced the ranks of screeners.

Be prepared

The agency said the best way for passengers to help speed things along is to show up prepared.

“Passenger preparedness can have a significant impact on wait times at security checkpoints nationwide,” the agency said in its release. “To facilitate the security screening process, travelers should arrive at the airport two hours in advance of a domestic flight and three hours prior to an international flight to ensure that they have time to park their cars (or return rental cars), check their bags with their airline, get their boarding pass, and make their way through the security screening process.”

TSA says being prepared means getting there early, having ID handy, knowing what you can and cannot take on board the aircraft, and not packing banned items in bags.

With an improved economy, more consumers are taking to the skies. Air traffic is up in early 2016 and is expected to break records this summer.As we re...

Article Image

Passengers give airlines higher marks

Despite complaints about the unpleasantness of air travel, and the addition of fees in recent years, airline passengers are giving carriers their best ratings in 10 years.

The J.D. Power and Associates 2016 North America Airline Satisfaction Study credits lower fares, better on-time arrivals, and a reduction in lost luggage for winning over the flying public. It says investments in improved in-flight services, such as Wi-Fi, hasn't hurt either.

“While the perception of the airline experience still has a lot of room for improvement, there is notable progress in terms of satisfaction among the highest-ranked airlines in the study due to their keen focus on meeting or exceeding passenger needs,” said J.D. Power's Rick Garlick.

He says airlines are paying attention and taking action when customers complain or make suggestions. He credits that responsiveness for increasing satisfaction across all touch points of the passenger experience.

Better reviews

The improvement can even be seen in ConsumerAffairs reviews, which tend to often focus solely on an airline's shortcoming. But Mark, who took a Delta flight from Austin to Atlanta, was mostly complementary.

“My experience with Delta over the years has been mixed at best,” Mark wrote in a ConsumerAffairs post. “They did very well this time. The MD-90 outbound to ATL was a bit cramped and noisy, but the flight was on time. No luggage problems. The B757 back to AUS was very comfortable. Ground and cabin crews were friendly and attentive. A good experience, I am pleased today.”

“Airlines are making positive strides by adding value to its products and services with newer and cleaner planes, better in-flight services, improving on-time arrivals and bumping fewer passengers from their flights,” Garlick said.

For airlines seeking to improve their standing, he says investing in product and service improvements now may reap big rewards in the future.

More tolerant of fees

J.D. Power's metric for measuring air travel satisfaction is an index that improved significantly over 2015, hitting its highest point in a decade. It found passengers were more tolerant of fees, perhaps because fares have moderated a bit in recent months.

In-flight service is the area where airlines scored lowest, although it was up 12 points over last year. The airlines that invested in in-flight entertainment upgrades, including more screens, Wi-Fi, and power outlets at seats, benefited most in this area.

Individual winners include Alaska Airlines, which placed first in the traditional carrier segment. Delta was second.

JetBlue took the honors for the highest rated low-cost carrier, edging out Southwest by a single point.

Despite complaints about the unpleasantness of air travel, and the addition of fees in recent years, airline passengers are giving carriers their best rati...

Article Image

Study: first class cabin makes air rage more likely

It seems hardly a month goes by without a report of a passenger flying into a rage while on board a commercial aircraft. It has become so common there is even a web site devoted to cataloging these incidents.

The displays of emotion are often chalked up to the decline in service by commercial airlines – long lines, delays and cancellations, and having to pay fees for things that were once included in the fare.

But researchers at the University of Toronto and Harvard have come up with another explanation.

Katy DeCelles and Michael Norton studied these incidents and concluded they are more likely to occur on aircraft that have a first class cabin. They say the odds of an air rage incident go up even more if coach passengers have to walk through first class to reach their cramped seats.

Four times more likely

Just having a first class cabin, the study found, made air rage four times more likely to occur than if the plane were a single class cabin.

"I expected there to be more support for a lack of leg room as a contributor to air rage, given the attention that leg room has had -- but there wasn't," said DeCelles, an associate professor of organizational behavior and human resource management.

The study relied on a database of thousands of flight incident reports, covering several years, on a large international carrier. The incidents had to be of a serious nature and included passengers refusing to sit down, yelling obscenities at a flight attendant of belligerent behavior closely associated with too much alcohol consumption.

While there may be a lot of factors contributing to air rage, the researchers suggest an overlooked one is perceived class inequality, feeling slighted because someone else is enjoying better accommodations.

Other possibilities

However, the research does not explain why celebrities, and others who are sitting in first class, sometimes engage in air rage. Actor Alec Baldwin, who presumably flies first class, has been bounced off at least one flight for allegedly getting into a tussle with a flight attendant.

Flight attendants, themselves, have been known to flip out at passengers. In one case a couple of years ago, one member of the flight crew deployed an emergency chute on the tarmac to escape the aircraft.

Another possible explanation for the rash of air rage incidents is an increase in the number of passengers who simply feel that deserve better than what they're getting. Mental health author Joseph Burgo writes that people who erupt in what he calls narcissistic rage may also express a frustrated sense of entitlement.

“By which I mean the feeling that one has a right to be given something which others believe should be obtained through effort, and unrealistic expectations of favorable treatment or automatic compliance with one’s expectations,” he writes.

And a lot of those folks are sitting in first class, not just in coach.

It seems hardly a month goes by without a report of a passenger flying into a rage while on board a commercial aircraft. It has become so common there is e...

Article Image

Feds have safety concerns about Boeing 787 GE engines

The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has issued an airworthiness directive (AD) for the Boeing 787-8 and 787-9 airliners powered by General Electric (GE) GEnx-1B engines.

The agency said it is taking the step to “reduce the likelihood of engine damage due to fan ice shedding.”

The AD revealed that a Boeing 787 Dreamliner reported a recent in-flight incident in which an engine fan blade rub event caused an engine to shut down while the plane cruised at 20,000 feet. The nature of the power loss did not allow the flight crew to restart the engine.

The plane has only two engines, but the flight crew was able to land safely, using the single working engine.

Urgency of the issue

“The urgency of this issue stems from the safety concern over continued safe flight and landing for airplanes that are powered by two GEnx-1B PIP2 engines operating in a similar environment to the event airplane,” the FAA said.

The agency said it is concerned that both GEnx-1B PIP2 engines could suffer damage at the same time, essentially turning the jumbo jet into a glider. The potential for this to happen, the FAA said, classifies the problem as “an urgent safety issue.”

There are 43 Boeing 787s in service in the U.S. The FAA directive does not cover international airlines, but it is common practice for them to follow directives from the American flight agency.

Newest jetliner

The Dreamliner is the latest Boeing jetliner; it is built with lightweight materials to give it greater range and fuel efficiency. The plane received final certification in August 2011 and entered service with its first commercial customer, All Nippon Airways, in October of that year.

The Boeing 787 launch has not exactly been a smooth one. In January of 2013, the FAA grounded Dreamliners operating in the U.S. while it investigated problems with its lithium-ion batteries.

Two incidents involving 787s operating in Japan released flammable electrolytes, resulting in heat damage and smoke. The FAA warned that these conditions could result in damage to critical systems, such as fire in the electrical compartment.

In the case of the latest AD, the FAA has not ruled out that some 787s could be grounded. However, Boeing says it is working with GE to resolve the issue.

The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has issued an airworthiness directive (AD) for the Boeing 787-8 and 787-9 airliners powered by General Electric (...

Article Image

February snow storms bring tough times for air travelers

Airline passengers trying to get to or away from the East Coast had a tough time of it in February.

The Department of Transportation (DOT) Air Travel Consumer Report says the nation's carriers experienced ten tarmac delays of more than three hours on domestic flights at airports on the East Coast during snow storms on February 5 and February 15. On the positive side, there were no tarmac delays of more than four hours on international flights.

Also during February, airlines posted an on-time arrival rate of 83.6%, considerably better than both the 72.8% reported a year earlier and the 81.3% mark posted in January 2016.

Another area of improvement was in cancellations. Just 1.6% of scheduled domestic flights were scratched in February compared with 4.8% in February 2015 and 2.6% in January 2016.

Other areas covered in the consumer report, which is available on the DOT website, include data on chronically delayed flights and their causes, along with complaints about baggage, reservation and ticketing, refunds, customer service, disability, and discrimination.

Airline passengers trying to get to or away from the East Coast had a tough time of it in February.The Department of Transportation (DOT) Air Travel Co...

Article Image

A new bill may ensure that parents and children can sit together on flights

Flying with children can come with a lot of anxiety for parents. In addition to making sure that all the essentials are packed and kept track of, it can be difficult to manage getting through security and boarding the plane, not to mention making sure everything goes smoothly during the actual flight.

In order to make things easier, an amendment has moved through Congress that would ensure that children can be seated next to parents on flights at no additional cost. According to the Washington Post, the proposal, which was voted to be a part of the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) reauthorization bill by the Senate, would also create new rules for security screening and boarding procedures.

"Commonsense protections"

The amendment could be a potential lifesaver for parents and pregnant women at the airport. It would allow the former to escort their children through security checkpoints and the latter to receive accommodations to pre-board their flights. Additionally, it would make it much easier for parents to secure adjacent seating with their young ones, something that has been harder to accomplish in recent years.

Many airlines now allow passengers to pay an extra fee for “preferred” coach seats, so unless parents are able to shell out extra money to ensure that they have seats that are together, it often doesn’t happen. Currently, many parents have to rely on altruistic passengers to switch seats with them or for gate agents to persuade those who are less willing.

“Our amendment puts in place commonsense protections that will reduce the extra and unnecessary stress applied to families and pregnant women traveling by air,” said Sen. Michael Bennet, who introduced the new stipulation.

Opposition

The amendment has met some opposition from airlines and trade groups, who say it is unnecessary. One such trade group, Airlines for America, says that passengers already have the ability to secure seats that are together without incurring any additional fees.

“Airlines have always worked to accommodate customers who are traveling together, including those traveling with children, and will continue to do so – without unnecessary federal mandates. . . We believe that customer service decisions are best left to the dedicated and experienced airline employees who interact with and receive feedback from their customers every day – not the government,” said Airlines for America spokesperson Vaughn Jennings.

Although the amendment passed unanimously in the Senate, the bill that it is attached to is still being debated – so there is still time for it to be tweaked or taken out. A spokesman for Sen. Bennet said that the real challenge will be trying to keep it attached to the bill through conference negotiations. 

Flying with children can come with a lot of anxiety for parents. In addition to making sure that all the essentials are packed and kept track of, it can be...

Article Image

Southwest hikes price on consumers looking to board flights early

Although profits have never been more lucrative for airline companies, that doesn’t mean that consumers have seen the last of price hikes.

The Arizona Republic reports that Southwest Airlines has increased the fee that consumers pay in order to board flights early. Previously, the company charged consumers $12.50 to board early, but the price has now been raised to $15, a 20% increase.

Being able to board early is especially important to Southwest passengers because the company does not have assigned seating; in other words, being able to get on the plane sooner directly affects the quality of the seat you’ll get and the amount of room you’ll have to work with in the overhead luggage compartments.

Boarding groups

Currently, Southwest has three boarding groups that travelers are put into when they check in for their flight – simply named Group A, Group B, and Group C. Passengers who are on the ball and check in early have the greatest chance of being put into Groups A or B, which allow them to board earlier.

However, those who pay the extra fee for the EarlyBird Check-In option don’t have to worry about their check-in time; they are automatically put into a boarding group 36 hours before the flight – 12 hours before other passengers can even attempt to check in.

Although opting for EarlyBird Check-In doesn’t automatically guarantee that a passenger will be in Group A, it does give them a significant advantage over other passengers. Its popularity with travelers has brought in millions of dollars for Southwest over the years; it earned the company an additional $280 million in 2015 and $230 million the year before. Now, with the price hike, it may be poised to make even more. 

Although profits have never been more lucrative for airline companies, that doesn’t mean that consumers have seen the last of price hikes.The Arizona R...

Article Image

Alaska Air taking over Virgin America

Alaska Air, a carrier operating primarily on the West Coast, is acquiring Virgin America. It's the latest airline industry consolidation and perhaps the only combination that wouldn't raise significant anti-trust hurdles at the Justice Department.

Virgin founder Richard Branson admits, however, that he is sad to see his little gem of an airline join the consolidation trend.

"I would be lying if I didn't admit sadness that our wonderful airline is merging with another," Branson wrote Monday in a post on Virgin's website. Because of federal regulations, Branson -- who is British -- was not allowed to hold controlling interest in his airline and was thus effectively sidelined during merger negotiations. 

"So there was sadly nothing I could do to stop it," he said.

The merger expands Alaska Air's existing footprint in California and will help it compete with the big four domestic carriers. Virgin America operates some transcontinental flights, but its major presence is in California.

Alaska Air says Virgin America customers will find expanded service to Silicon Valley markets, as well as Seattle. It says the combination of the two airlines will provide more connections to international flights leaving Seattle, San Francisco, and Los Angeles.

East Coast presence

It will also create an East Coast presence for Alaska Air, with access to slot-controlled airports like Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport and the two major New York City-area airports, JFK and LaGuardia.

"With our expanded network and strong presence in California, we'll offer customers more attractive flight options for nonstop travel,” Brad Tilden, chairman and CEO of Alaska Air Group, said in a release. “We look forward to bringing together two incredible groups of employees to build on the successes they have achieved as standalone companies to make us an even stronger competitor nationally."

Besides being a win for stockholders, the two companies say the merger is a win for consumers too. They point out that Alaska Air has won the Wall Street Journal's top ranking among the nine largest domestic carriers for overall operational performance three years in a row. The number two airline? Virgin America.

Virgin America has also been consistently voted “Best Domestic Airline” by Leisure's Annual World's Best Awards and Conde Nast Traveler's Readers' Choice Awards. Both airlines have been highly rated in terms of quality and efficiency.

1,200 daily departures

The combined company will maintain hubs in Seattle, San Francisco, Los Angeles, Anchorage, Alaska, and Portland, Oregon, with 1,200 daily departures. Its fleet will include 280 aircraft, including Virgin America's 60 Airbus A319 and A320 jets, with three classes of service.

The deal has won the unanimous approval of the boards of directors of both companies, but is conditioned on regulatory clearance, a green light from Virgin America shareholders, and satisfaction of other customary closing conditions.

The companies say they expect to complete the transaction with regulators' approval no later than Jan. 1, 2017.

Alaska Air, a carrier operating primarily on the West Coast, is acquiring Virgin America. It's the latest airline industry consolidation and perhaps the on...

Article Image

American Airlines changes its policy and will allow consumers to cancel flights

Travel plans change all the time, so it goes without saying that consumers need to be able to change flights or cancel them altogether. By law, all airline companies need to offer consumers one of two options: either they can allow travelers to cancel their flight within 24 hours and dispense a refund or they can put the flight on hold so that the consumer locks in the current price, allowing them to shop around for a better deal.

The vast majority of airlines have adopted the former rule, where they would allow consumers to cancel their flight and receive a refund. However, up until now, American Airlines was one of the few companies that offered the hold option. This left many consumers confused when they tried to cancel their flights in the past, but now that will no longer be an issue. The Washington Post reports that the company has said that it will be switching to the cancellation policy as of today.

Hold policy still active for now

The policy change will alleviate a lot of customer confusion over why they couldn’t cancel their American flight, especially when the option is so common with other carriers. “Up until now, we’ve done it a little differently than other airlines. . . Reasonably enough, people assumed the policies were the same,” said American Airlines spokesman Josh Freed.

While the new cancellation policy may be more attractive to some consumers, the hold policy does have its merits. The system allowed consumers to put a 24-hour hold on any flight reservation that was more than a week away.

This provided something of a safety net; if the price on the flight went up, then consumers could still get the flight on the old price. If the price went down, then travelers could re-book the flight at a lower cost. The holds could also be canceled and placed on other flights, which would then give consumers another 24-hour window to keep searching for cheaper rates.

Luckily, consumers who like the hold option don’t need to say goodbye to it quite yet. While the change goes into effect as of today, consumers who want to use the hold option will still have the ability to do so for some time. Freed says that travelers will still be able to place holds on 24-hour flights booked with reward miles, and those who choose to use the American Airlines website will still be able to use it too until the company phases it out at a later date. 

Travel plans change all the time, so it goes without saying that consumers need to be able to change flights or cancel them altogether. By law, all airline...

Article Image

A good start in 2016 for air travelers

Airline on-time arrival rates showed improvement in January on both a year-over-year and month-over-month basis.

According to the Department of Transportation's (DOT) Air Travel Consumer Report, the January on-time arrival rate was 81.3%, an improvement from both the 76.8% rate posted a year earlier and the 77.8% in December.

In even more good news, there were no tarmac delays of more than three hours on domestic flights. However, there were eight tarmac delays of more than four hours on international flights. All delays are under investigation.

As far as cancellations go, carriers scratched 2.6% of their scheduled domestic flights. The year before, the rate was 2.5% and in December it was 1.7%.

The consumer report also includes information on chronically delayed flights, and the causes of flight delays along with such issues as flight problems, baggage, reservation, and ticketing issues.

What to do

Consumers may file air travel service complaints on the web at this address. 

The full report  is available on the DOT website.

Airline on-time arrival rates showed improvement in January on both a year-over-year and month-over-month basis.According to the Department of Transpor...

Article Image

United Airlines squeezing in a few more seats

Flying coach is about to get a little more uncomfortable. United Airlines has confirmed to USA Today that it is adding a seat to each row on 19 of its 74 Boeing 777 wide-bodied jets.

Currently, United's 777s have 9 seats per row. Since it is impossible to make the aircraft any wider, adding a seat to each row is going to make all other seats a little more cramped.

But United isn't setting the pace in making customers more uncomfortable. It's simply catching up with an industry trend. Several other airlines have already moved to the ten abreast seating on the 777 to make each flight a little more profitable.

And profit is what is driving the effort to move more people with fewer flights. Adding seats raises the profit margin on each flight, making stock in the company more attractive to shareholders.

According to USA Today, American Airlines, Emirates, All Nippon Airways, Air New Zealand, KLM, and Air France are just some of the carriers that have ordered Boeing 777s with 10 seats per row.

Flying high

A few years ago airlines were bouncing in and out of bankruptcy. Now, profits are flying high. CBS News recently reported that U.S. airlines made almost $18 billion in profit in the first three quarters of 2015.

Lower fuel costs are helping, but it was the addition of fees for things like checked bags, meals, and pillows that have helped carriers move from red ink to black.

CBS News quotes airline industry spokeswoman Jean Medina as saying consumers benefit when the airlines rack up profits because the airlines are reinvesting those profits back into the business.

Perhaps. But they're not adding flights. They're apparently adding seats to the existing ones.

Flying coach is about to get a little more uncomfortable. United Airlines has confirmed to USA Today that it is adding a seat to each row on 19 of its 74 B...

Article Image

Senator, trade group challenge airline fuel surcharges

The price of oil may be down but you'd never know it from looking at airline surcharges. And Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.) doesn't think that's right.

Blumenthal has asked the U.S. Department of Transportation to look into why airlines are continuing to hit travelers with surcharges that can add hundreds of dollars in fees to tickets, especially on international flights.

“It is an unfair and deceptive practice when airlines convince consumers they are earning thousands of miles to use with award programs only to be surprised by hundreds of dollars in hidden fees at the checkout page,” Blumenthal wrote in a Feb. 22 letter to Transportation Secretary Anthony Foxx.

The DOT regulations state that airline surcharges must be baed on a "reasonable estimate" of the per-passenger fuel expense above a baseline fuel cost. Blumenthal says carriers are getting around that by using such vague descriptions as "carrier-imposed charges" or "international/domestic surcharges."

Also calling on the DOT to act is the Business Travel Coalition, which said the "continued, widespread imposition of these substantial, add-on fuel surcharges in the face of plummeting jet fuel prices cannot be justified."

"Massive overcharges"

In its letter to Foxx, the coalition -- which represents business travelers -- said the continued imposition of surcharges "constitutes an unfair and deceptive act or practice and an unfair method of competition" which "inflict massive overcharges on consumers.”

Both Blumenthal and the business travelers group note that the surcharges have continued despite the price of oil plummeting from a high of $147 per barrel in 2008 to approximately $30 per barrel today. 

Blumenthal said the surcharges have had an especially devastating impact on the value of frequent-flyer programs.

“That carrier-imposed surcharges sometimes only surface when a consumer attempts to redeem an award ticket through an airline loyalty program seems to further confirm the deceptive nature of these surcharges,” he wrote.

The price of oil may be down but you'd never know it from looking at airline surcharges. And Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.) doesn't think that's right....

Article Image

The Goldilocks approach to booking flights will save money

Consumers are probably beginning to plan summer vacations. But if those trips involve air travel, when you book and when you fly can affect the total cost of the vacation.

If you don't plan to travel for a couple of months, you're in luck. CheapAir.com reports the best time to book your flight is 54 days before departure.

This year's study of dates and pricing analyzed 1.3 billion fares and identified five booking “zones” that can save consumers money.

The study included airfares for roughly 3 million different trips across every day of the year. And by “trip,” the company means an itinerary going from Point A to Point B on a specific date with a specific return date.

For each trip, CheapAir identified the lowest fare offered every day from 320 days in advance until 1 day in advance.

Prime booking window

“Fifty-four days is a good number to start with, but it’s important to know that every trip is different,” Jeff Klee, CEO of CheapAir.com, said in a release. “That’s why we have what we call the ‘Prime Booking Window’ which is between 21 and 112 days before departure.

Klee says for most trips within the U.S., the best time to buy a ticket will be somewhere in that range.

“But because different markets have different dynamics, we now also provide the Prime Booking Window for the specific city you want to visit,” he said.

Klee says most airfares follow a fairly consistent pattern. Once the fare is posted, the price is pretty high. As the departure date approaches, the fare begins to drop.

When the departure date is just a few weeks away, the fare begins to go up again. To save money, Klee says you have to hit the bottom of that curve, picking the “just right” moment to book your flight. The biggest mistake is waiting too late to purchase.

“People ask all the time if it’s true that at the last minute the airlines have unsold seats that they practically ‘give away’, but that’s rarely the case,” Klee said. “Fares usually go up dramatically within 14 days of the flight.”

Five zones

Generally, fares are posted for 11 months before departure. CheapAir.com has divided that booking window into five “zones.” Here’s what travelers should know about each one:

  • First Dibs (197 - 335 days out): First Dibbers get their pick of flight times, nonstop options, and seats. However, they pay an average of $50 more than they would during the “Prime Booking Window.”
  • Peace of Mind (113 – 196 days out): The Peace of Mind zone offers a balance between flight options and price. Travelers pay an average of $20 more per ticket than they would in the Prime Booking Window but also have more flight options to choose from.
  • Prime Booking Window (21 – 112 days out): This is the zone for bargain hunters. During these 90 days, fares fluctuate a lot, sometimes day to day. By checking frequently during this time, travelers might find real bargains.
  • Push Your Luck (14 – 20 days out): This is when fares can fluctuate dramatically. Depending on how full flights are, travelers may get a fantastic deal, or they may pay significantly more. But remember, popular flights during peak seasons are less likely to have low fares in this zone.
  • Hail Mary(0 – 13 days out): On rare occasions, the Hail Mary zone offers an incredible rate. However, travelers in this zone pay an average of $75 over the Prime Booking Window. In the final week that premium shoots up to $200.

Based on its findings, CheapAir has developed a tool to help consumers find the best time to book. You can check it out here.

Consumers are probably beginning to plan summer vacations. But if those trips involve air travel, when you book and when you fly can affect the total cost ...

Article Image

United and American airlines add snacks, entertainment options

There are plenty of people out there who simply don’t enjoy flying. The long lines, security, and often-cramped flights can really give consumers headaches. Luckily, a couple of airlines have recently changed their certain policies to make the process more comfortable.

United Airlines will be stepping up its game when it comes to boarding certain passengers, while American airlines has upgraded its in-flight entertainment to keep travelers happy. Both airlines are adding free snacks.

Altered boarding procedures

The first step to taking off is boarding a flight, and it can be downright miserable if the wait is long and your children are unhappy. That is why United Airlines’ altered boarding procedures could come as a huge relief to some consumers; the company has decided to rescind a decision it made four years ago and once again allow families with young children to board flights early, the Chicago Tribune reported.

The change couldn’t come any sooner for families, who will be able to avoid some waiting time when getting on flights after February 15, the day the change will go into effect.

“It takes a little bit of the stress out of the travel situation,” said Sandra Pineau-Boddison, United Airlines senior vice president of customers, in a prepared statement. “Some things are just the right thing to do.”

Snacks and expanded entertainment

Both carriers are adding free snacks on some flgihts. And American says it will be adding more free entertainment options to its flights. 

United is offering an Asian-style snack mix of rice crackers, sesame sticks and wasabi peas, or a zesty ranch mix of mini pretzel sticks, Cajun corn sticks and ranch soy nuts. United is serving up the complimentary snacks to economy-cabin customers on flights within North America, to and from Central Americaand between Honolulu and Guam.

Stroopwafels, available on flights before 9:45 a.m., may be enjoyed straight out of the package or warmed on top of a cup of coffee or tea to soften the waffle and melt the caramel filling.The packaged snack mixes will be available on flights departing at 9:45 a.m. or later.

“American Airlines is continuing to elevate the customer experience by adding complimentary snacks and more free movies, TV shows, and music in the Main Cabin,” said the company in a news release.

American passengers can expect the additional snacks and meals to begin rolling out in February, but only on certain flights. They include trips from New York (JFK) to Los Angeles (LAX), New York (JFK) to San Francisco (SFO), and Miami (MIA) to Los Angeles (LAX). Other domestic flights will have additional snacks by April. Complimentary meal service will also be available for flights from Dallas (DFW) to Hawaii starting in May.

For entertainment, American is expanding its in-flight library to include 40 movies, 60 TV shows, and 300 music albums. The airline will also be offering international live TV on its long-haul international flights, a first for the industry according to the press release. The company hopes these expanded options will keep consumers coming back for future flights.

“We want customers to choose American every time they fly. . . We are giving our customer more choices to enhance their personal flying experience by offering new service and new entertainment options in all cabins,” said Fernand Fernandez, vice president of American Global Marketing. 

There are plenty of people out there who simply don’t enjoy flying. The long lines, security, and often-cramped flights can really give consumers headaches...

Article Image

Airline on-time performance slips in November

When compared with how things went in October, the airlines didn't have a particularly good November.

The Department of Transportation's (DOT) Air Travel Consumer Report shows that the reporting carriers posted an on-time arrival rate of 83.7% for the month. While that's more than 3% above the year-ago rate, it's down more than 3% from the month before.

In addition, following a month in which there were just two tarmac delays, the airlines reported five delays of more than three hours on domestic flights and one delay of more than four hours on an international flight. Three of the domestic delays were related to an equipment failure at New York City area airports on November 14. All are being investigated.

The report also includes data on cancellations, chronically delayed flights, and the causes of flight delays along with flight problems, baggage, reservation and ticketing, refunds, consumer service, disability, and discrimination.

Also included are statistics on mishandled baggage reports and reports of incidents involving the loss, death, or injury of animals.

The complete report may be found on the DOT website.

When compared with how things went in October, the airlines didn't have a particularly good November.The Department of Transportation's (DOT) Air Trave...

Article Image

Study: tarmac stranding rule creating more delays

The federal government enacted a new rule in 2010, penalizing airlines if they keep planes full of passengers stranded on the airport tarmac for extended periods of time.

The rule followed several highly publicized incidents in which passengers complained of being stranded for hours, with no food or water and with highly unsanitary conditions.

Government data shows that tarmac strandings are now fairly rare, but like many rules, this one may have had unintended consequences. A study by Dartmouth College and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) finds more passengers now encounter other types of delays.

The study, supported by Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) National Center of Excellence for Aviation Operations Research (NEXTOR II), concluded that it now takes most passengers far more time to arrive at their destinations.

Significantly increased delays

"Overall, the rule is estimated to have significantly increased passenger delays, especially for passengers scheduled to travel on the flights that are at risk of long tarmac delays," said Vikrant Vaze, an assistant professor at Dartmouth's Thayer School of Engineering.

The rule requires commercial aircraft to take off or allow passengers to leave the plane no later than three hours after the cabin door closes at the departure airport. At the other end, passengers must be allowed to depart the aircraft no later than three hours after touchdown at the arrival airport. Airlines that fail to meet that requirement face hefty fines.

The researchers say the consequences of the tarmac rule could have been predicted. Now, when it is evident that a flight will not be able to take off on time, the airline is likely to cancel it before passengers can board, heading off potential fines.

When the flight is cancelled, the passengers must then scramble to make alternate travel plans, often delaying their arrival at their destinations.

Recent data contradiction

It should be pointed out that recent government transportation data shows just the opposite. As we recently reported, the FAA shows no three-hour tarmac delays occurred in July, while the month also experienced very low percentages for delays and cancellations.

The Dartmouth-MIT researchers say they studied actual flight schedule and delay data from 2007 before the rule was enacted, then compared these delays to those estimated for hypothetical scenarios with the rule in effect for that same year.

While the rule has been highly effective in decreasing tarmac delays, especially long delays, their research shows each passenger-minute of tarmac time saving is achieved at the cost of an increase of approximately three passenger-minutes in total passenger delays.

The researchers attribute these delays primarily to the increase in flight cancellations, resulting in passengers requiring rebooking and often leading to extensive delays in reaching their final destinations. The researchers say the tarmac rule should be tweaked.

"We concluded that a better balance between the conflicting objectives of reducing the frequency of long tarmac times and reducing total passenger delays can be achieved through a modified version of the existing rule," Vaze said. "This modified version involves increasing the tarmac time limit to 3.5 hours and only applying the rule to flights with planned departure times before 5 p.m.”

To cut the airlines a little more slack, the researchers say the penalty clock should stop when a stranded aircraft begins returning to the gate instead of when passengers are allowed to get off.

The federal government enacted a new rule in 2010, penalizing airlines if they keep planes full of passengers stranded on the airport tarmac for extended p...

Article Image

United fined $2.75 million for violating disability, delay rules

United Airlines has been fined $2.75 million for its treatment of disabled passengers and for lengthy tarmac delays. 

“It is our duty to ensure that travelers with disabilities have access to the services they need, and that when significant tarmac delays happen, travelers are not left on the plane,” said U.S. Transportation Secretary Anthony Foxx.  “We will make sure that airlines comply with our rules and treat their passengers fairly.”

The Department of Transportation (DOT) began investigating United after noting a "significant increase" in the number of disability-related complaints it was receiving. 

Consumers rate United Airlines

In one of the most dramatic incidents, a passenger with cerebral palsy had to crawl off a United flight when the airline failed to provide a wheelchair.

The complaints from disabled passengers involved incidents at Houston International Airport, Chicago O’Hare International Airport, Denver International Airport, Newark International Airport, and Dulles International Airport; they mostly concerned boarding and disembarking from airplanes and moving through the terminal.

The investgation found that in numerous instances United "failed to return passengers’ wheelchairs, other mobility aids, or other assistive devices in a timely manner or in the condition in which the airline received them," the DOT said.

Besides a $2 million fine, United has agreed to spend $650,000 to train personnel and develop a pilot program to help disabled passengers order wheelchairs and other assistance. United said it is already testing a smartphone app that would do just that.

Tarmac violations

United is also being fined $750,000 for five lengthy tarmac delays that took place at Chicago O’Hare International Airport on December 8, 2013 and one lengthy tarmac delay of a flight that was diverted to Houston Hobby Airport on May 20, 2015.

Investigators said United's gate mismanagement caused five flights to sit on the tarmac for longer than three hours without passengers being given an opportunity to deplane.

Under DOT rules, U.S. airlines operating aircraft with 30 or more passenger seats are prohibited from allowing their domestic flights to remain on the tarmac for more than three hours and their international flights to remain on the tarmac for more than four hours at U.S. airports without giving passengers an opportunity to leave the plane. Exceptions to the time limits are allowed only for safety, security, or air traffic control-related reasons.  

The rules also require airlines to provide adequate food and water, ensure that lavatories are working, and, if necessary, provide medical attention to passengers during long tarmac delays. 

United Airlines has been fined $2.75 million for its treatment of disabled passengers and for lengthy tarmac delays. “It is our duty to ensure that tra...

Article Image

Southwest Airlines agrees to settle safety suit

The U.S. Justice Department has announced that Southwest Airlines has agreed to settle a federal lawsuit brought against the carrier. The suit alleges that the company violated Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) safety regulations in its maintenance of its Boeing 737s.

In April, the FAA charged Southwest Airlines with two safety violations, including one involving a loss of cabin pressure during a flight from Boston to St. Louis. The agency charged that on May 13, 2013, a Southwest Boeing 737 lost cabin pressure, the cabin’s oxygen masks deployed, and the aircraft made an emergency landing in Baltimore.

The FAA further alleged that after the event, Southwest mechanics failed to complete a mandatory inspection to check whether the change in cabin pressure damaged the aircraft and to ensure used oxygen bottles were replaced.

In August, the FAA proposed a $325,000 civil penalty against the Dallas-based carrier for allegedly operating a Boeing 737 that was not in compliance with Federal Aviation Regulations.

The penalty is the result of an inspection made on July 9, 2014, when an FAA inspector performed an aging aircraft inspection on the 737 while it was at a maintenance facility in San Salvador, El Salvador. According to the FAA, the inspector discovered that Southwest improperly recorded a temporary repair to an approximately nine-inch crease in the aluminum skin of the jetliner’s rear cargo door as a permanent repair.

Settlement terms

Under the terms of the settlement Southwest will make operational changes to improve oversight of, and control over, third parties that perform maintenance on its aircraft. Southwest also agreed to pay a $2.8 million civil penalty and up to $5.5 million in deferred civil penalties if it does not implement the operational changes set forth in the settlement agreement.

“The Justice Department believes the settlement agreement with Southwest Airlines Co. will provide meaningful improvements in safety and compliance and further ensure the integrity of FAA air safety regulations,” said Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General Benjamin C. Mizer, head of the Justice Department’s Civil Division.

FAA Administrator Michael Huerta said the settlement provides strong incentives for the company to take specific steps to address the compliance problems that the FAA investigations uncovered.

The U.S. Justice Department has announced that Southwest Airlines has agreed to settle a federal lawsuit brought against the carrier. The suit alleges that...

Article Image

Which airlines serve the healthiest food?

Let's start by noting that you are lucky to get any food when flying coach on a U.S. airline. That said, when passengers are served food at 30,000 feet, just how healthy is it?

That was the question DietDetective.com set out to answer. Its report rates the food for 12 airlines, with five stars being the highest rating and no stars being the lowest. The survey includes health ratings, average calories per airline, cost, comments, best bets, food offerings, calories, and exercise equivalents.

“This year Virgin America wins the top spot again with the "healthiest" food choices in the sky with Delta and JetBlue tied for second,” said Charles Platkin, editor of DietDetective.com and a professor at Hunter College and the City University of New York School of Public Health.

Frontier Airlines received the lowest score, and Platkin says was the least cooperative.

Virgin America gets four and a half stars

Virgin America achieved four and a half stars with an average calorie count – including meals, snack boxes, and individual snacks – of 352.27 calories.

Delta flew away with a four star rating but an average calorie count of 512. JetBlue also achieved a four star rating. Its average calorie count was lower than both Virgin America and Delta – 327.

When flying, Platkin says you are likely to get hungry. Though security restrictions are much tighter than they used to be, he suggests travelers bring food with them, or purchase it after passing through security.

Bringing your own

Water is one of those things you'll probably have to buy at the concourse snack bar or gift shop. But it's important, Platkin says, because dehydration can lead to -- or increase -- hunger, jet lag, and fatigue.

He says low-calorie cereals are also a good choice. Look for portable choices at under 120 calories per cup. You can also look for cereal in a cup. It's portion controlled in 1.5-ounce packs that are easy to store and easy to use, he says.

Fruit and salads are very healthy but can't always stand up to the rough treatment air travel often entails. You can buy them at the airport and pay a little more than if you made them at home, but Platkin says it is always a better alternative to what is served on board.

For ease and convenience, it's hard to beat an energy bar. Although they tend to be high in calories and fat, Platkin says they are sure to be healthier than a slice of pizza or a candy bar at the airport.

Let's start by noting that you are lucky to get any food when flying coach on a U.S. airline. That said, when passengers are served food at 30,000 feet, ju...

Article Image

A pretty good October for air travelers

In the midst of the peak traveling season, the Department of Transportation (DOT) has some good news for those who choose to go by air.

The nation' airlines posted an on-time arrival rate of 87.0% in October -- a surge of 7% from the same month in 2014 and up 0.5% from the previous month. According to the DOT's Air Travel Consumer Report, that's the third highest of the 250 months with comparable records.

That's not the only thing positive about October. The carriers canceled just 0.5% of their scheduled domestic flights in October, versus the 1.1% cancellation rate posted in October 2014. That's the second lowest of the 250 months with comparable records; only September 2015’s 0.4% rate was lower.

And, if that's not enough, there was only one tarmac delay of more than three hours on a domestic flight and one tarmac delay of more than four hours on an international flight. The DOT is investigating those delays.

The consumer report also includes data on chronically delayed flights, the causes of flight delays, and statistics on mishandled baggage reports filed by consumers. Also covered are aviation service complaints regarding a range of issues such as flight problems, baggage, reservations and ticketing, refunds, consumer services, disability, and discrimination.

The consumer report also includes reports of incidents involving the loss, death, or injury of animals traveling by air, as required to be filed by U.S. carriers.

The complete report is available on the DOT website.

In the midst of the peak traveling season, the Department of Transportation (DOT) has some good news for those who choose to go by air.The nation' airl...

Article Image

Rips in your luggage after a flight? The airline has to pay

Amid the many complaints about air travel, consumers often report that their luggage looks like it's taken a side trip through a war zone when it arrives on the baggage claim conveyor belt.

Should this happen to you, remember that it is the airline's responsibility to get your bag to your destination without tearing it up.

The U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) recently issued a notice reminding airlines of this fact. Airlines, the government says, have to compensate passengers for damage to wheels, straps, zippers, handles, and other protruding parts of checked baggage beyond normal wear and tear.

The government's notice also stresses that airlines are required to accept consumers' reports of mishandled bags, even if the agent doesn't think the airline is liable.

Inspection results

The DOT issued the reminder late last month after it said recent airport inspections discovered that airlines were denying claims, based on the parts of the luggage that showed damage.

“These inspections demonstrate the department’s commitment to protecting consumers when they travel by air,” said U.S. Transportation Secretary Anthony Foxx. “While we are proud of the progress we’ve made so far, we will continue to strengthen how we monitor and enforce compliance with air travel consumer protection and civil rights rules.”

The inspection took place at 16 U.S. airports in September. Federal inspectors said they found some airlines were refusing to accept reports from consumers when they complained about damage to their luggage while it was in the airlines' care.

Common complaint

At ConsumerAffairs, we hear from many airline passengers who have experienced damaged bags at the hands of airline baggage handlers. Just about every airline in our database has at least one horror story about damaged bags.

Last week's reminder to the airlines informed the companies – which are enjoying record profits, thanks in part to baggage fees – that they will face enforcement action if they aren't in compliance with DOT rules by January 9.

Amid the many complaints about air travel, consumers often report that their luggage looks like it's taken a side trip through a war zone when it arrives o...

Article Image

Virgin America traveler gets barred from his flight

Many of us have had less than stellar experiences at the airport. After all of the long lines, changing gates, and hoops to jump through, it can be even more frustrating if you don't even manage to get on your flight. That is the story of one traveler who missed his flight, not because of a cancellation, but because the flight crew and captain would not let him on the plane.

The traveler, Robert B. Abtahi, is a prominent Texas lawyer, the vice-chair of the Dallas Plan Commission and, perhaps not coincidentally an Irani-American. He was trying to board his Virgin America flight to Dallas from LaGuardia Airport when the gate agent told him that the crew did not “feel comfortable” having him aboard.

The reason for these feelings? Apparently, Abtahi had cut off one of the flight attendants earlier that day while entering the airport through a revolving door.

“[The gate agent] said I cut in front of a flight attendant on my way inside the airport and that they didn't feel comfortable with me on the flight,” he told the Dallas Morning News. “I said if that was the case then I would apologize. She went back on the phone and said I wasn't allowed on the flight.”

A "misunderstanding"

The decision to keep passengers off of a flight ultimately rests with the captain, so the traveler did end up missing his flight. In the end, he was able to travel back home on an American Airlines flight.

Although Virgin America has not officially explained why the passenger was kept off his flight, the company says it's sorry the event happened, calling it a “misunderstanding.” The company has offered Abtahi two free flights and said it is willing to reimburse him for the American Airlines ticket that he purchased.

Instead, Abtahi asked Virgin to donate the two free tickets to the Human Rights Initiative of North Texas, which aids refugees fleeing persecution. He told the Dallas Morning News that all he had wanted was an apology and that he doesn't “like the idea of throwing freebies at the problem.”  

Travelers react

Not only did a few freebies not make Abtahi happy, the whole affair turned off at least one frequent flyer who wrote to us about the incident.

"I fly about 75K a year, mostly with United out of SFO. I have been considering switching, perhaps to Virgin America. But I follow a simple rule. If a company does stupid things, and they get caught in the media, then I don't do business with them," said Nadia, a ConsumerAffairs reader who asked that we not use her full name.

"The fact that a Virgin employee could extract 'revenge' against a random customer in the name of security and that employee keeps his/her job is in my view a stupid thing," Nadia said. "Won't be considering Virgin America anytime soon now."

Many of us have had less than stellar experiences at the airport. After all of the long lines, changing gates, and hoops to jump through, it can be even mo...

Article Image

American Airlines changes frequent flier program to reward dollars spent

American Airlines, newly merged with US Airways, is changing its frequent flier program to reward dollars spent instead of miles flown. The change benefits big-spending corporate travelers and hurts occasional pleasure fliers.

But before you denounce American for following the money, it's worth noting that the change brings it into line with the way most airlines reward their frequent fliers these days.

Consumers rate American Airlines

United and Delta made a similar switch over the last few years, joining Southwest, JetBlue, and Virgin America. 

Travel industry watchers weren't surprised by the change and, in fact, said they had been expecting it once the merger was finalized. 

The change basically follows modifications in the way fares are set. Once upon a time, fares tended to reflect miles flown -- a 2,000-mile trip cost more than a 600-mile junket. But not today. Fares are now set by a complex formula that includes route density, when the flight is booked, demand for seats on the travel date, and so forth. 

Book at the last minute and you may be paying $2,000 for that center seat while your neighbor on the aisle paid only $200 because he booked two months in advance.

Awarding frequent flier premiums on dollars rather than miles also puts the program back into synch with its original goal -- rewarding the most profitable passengers. Airlines make a lot more money on business travelers, who not only fly more often but tend to make costly last-minute reservations and book business-class seats when they think they can get by with it. 

5 miles per dollar

Like United and Delta, American will award a minimum of five miles for every dollar spent on the base fare and fees, excluding taxes. Elite members will get more miles per dollar spent.

Redemption levels also will be modified, starting in March, with fewer points required for Mexico, the Caribbean, Central America, and for some shorter domestic flights. But trips to Europe and Asia, and travel in premium cabins, will require higher redemptions.

American Airlines, newly merged with US Airways, is changing its frequent flier program to reward dollars spent instead of miles flown. The change benefits...

Article Image

Delta customers will no longer be able to count larger pets as checked baggage

For many people, taking a trip with your whole family means bringing beloved pets as well. Up until now, Delta had allowed larger animals to be flown as checked baggage, but they recently decided that they will end this practice starting next year.

Some exceptions

The change will go into effect on March 1, 2016, and will make it necessary for bigger animals to be flown via Delta's cargo service. Consumers who often fly with larger pets, and have booked flights after that date, will be notified by the airline.

Despite the change, many smaller animals, such as small dogs and cats, will still be allowed to fly as checked baggage – though the standard fee will still apply. Some larger animals will also still be accepted as well due to special circumstances. These include such animals traveling with military members under active transfer orders, service animals, and animals used for emotional support.

Delta wants to reassure its passengers that they still care about pets; in fact, they claim that the change is a direct result of that caring. “Many of us at Delta are pet lovers and we know that they are important members of the family. . . This change will ultimately ensure that we have a high-quality, consistent service for pets when their owners choose to ship them with Delta Cargo,” said Bill Lentsch, Senior Vice President of Airport Customer Service and Cargo Operations.

Increased cost and planning

The change in policy raises costs for consumers if they decide to fly with a larger pet. The Atlanta Journal Constitution calculates that the cost for shipping a pet can vary greatly in price – from $193 to $1,481.18.

Even if the you can manage the increased cost, there is additional effort involved in the new process too. Pets shipped via the cargo service must have a separate booking that is completed two weeks before the departure date. Dropping your pet off at the airport may be a bit of a hassle too, since they need to be delivered to, and received from, the cargo area.

Even after taking preliminary steps, consumers are not guaranteed that their pets will ultimately make it on the same flight as them. If this happens, there may be more than a few disgruntled pet owners waiting at the airport to see when their four-legged friends will arrive.  

For many people, taking a trip with your whole family means bringing beloved pets as well. Up until now, Delta had allowed larger animals to be flown as ch...

Article Image

The nation's airlines step it up a notch

If you traveled by air during September, there's a good chance you got to your destination when you were supposed to.

The Department of Transportation’s (DOT) Air Travel Consumer Report shows airlines posted an on-time arrival rate of 86.5% in September, up from both the 81.1% on-time rate a year earlier and the 80.3 percent reported in August 2015.

The September on-time rate was the fourth highest of the 249 months with comparable records, the second highest for any September, and above the September average of 82.73% in the previous 20 years. September 2001 was not included in the averages.

That's not the end of the good news. The carriers reported airlines reported no tarmac delays of more than three hours on domestic flights during September and no tarmac delays of more than four hours on international flights.

Additional information

The consumer report also includes data on consumer complaints, cancellations, chronically delayed flights, and the causes of flight delays filed with the Department’s Bureau of Transportation Statistics (BTS) by the reporting carriers.

In addition, there are statistics on mishandled baggage reports filed by consumers with the carriers, passengers denied confirmed space (oversales/bumping), and aviation service complaints filed regarding a range of issues such as flight problems, baggage, reservation and ticketing, refunds, consumer service, disability, and discrimination.

Incidents involving the loss, death, or injury of animals traveling by air are also covered.

The complete report can be found on the DOT website.

If you traveled by air during September, there's a good chance you got to your destination when you were supposed to.The Department of Transportation’s...

Article Image

Air travel expected to rise 3% during Thanksgiving holiday

Consumers will be on the move this Thanksgiving holiday weekend, resulting in a significant rise in air travel, according to Airlines for America (A4A), an industry trade group.

In its annual forecast, the group predicts 25.3 million passengers will travel on U.S. airlines during the 12-day Thanksgiving travel period, a 3% increase over last year and the highest number since the Great Recession.

What's behind the increase? The trade group says an improving economy and still-low gasoline prices have put consumers in the mood to travel over the holiday.

Airlines are expected to add capacity, in the form of larger planes and additional routes, to handle the increase in passenger traffic.

Busiest travel days

According to the airlines' calendar, the Thanksgiving air travel period extends from Friday, Nov. 20 through Tuesday, Dec. 1. Daily passenger volumes are projected to range from 1.4 million to 2.7 million, with the busiest travel days in ranked order expected to be:

  • Wednesday, Nov. 25
  • Sunday, Nov. 29
  • Monday, Nov. 30

To avoid the rush, A4A says your best travel days during this busy period will be Thursday, Nov. 26, and Friday, Nov. 27.

Expanding capacity

“As competition continues to boost schedules and drive down airfares in 2015, customers are seeing more opportunities to fly during the holiday season,” said A4A Vice President and Chief Economist John Heimlich. “Airlines are taking delivery of new, larger aircraft to accommodate the increase in passengers.”

A4A says the continued profitability of U.S. airlines will allow them to increase capacity to meet the short-term increase in holiday demand. Airlines have been more profitable in recent years, since adding fees to baggage and other items that were once provided at no charge. Lower fuel prices have also increased profitability.

During the first nine months of 2015, the 10 largest publicly traded U.S. passenger carriers reported pre-tax earnings of $18.8 billion, resulting in a profit margin of 15.6% – up from 7.7% in 2014.

On a net basis, the group reported $17.9 billion in earnings, or 14.8% of revenues – up from 5.7% in 2014.

Consumers will be on the move this Thanksgiving holiday weekend, resulting in a significant rise in air travel, according to Airlines for America (A4A), an...

Article Image

Report: avoided airline accidents breed complacency

On January 15, 2009 US Airways Flight 1549 took off from LaGuardia Airport and struck a flock of geese as the plane gained altitude, causing both engines to fail.

Somehow, pilots “Sully” Sullenberger and Jeffrey Skiles glided to a landing on the Hudson River, safely evacuating all 155 occupants to rescue boats that quickly arrived on the scene.

Known as “The Miracle On The Hudson,” the pilots were justifiably celebrated for their skillful handling of the emergency in what was undoubtedly viewed as a great success.

And perhaps, therein lie the seeds of a future disaster.

Risk analysts Peter Madsen of Brigham Young University and Robin L. Dillon and Catherine H. Tinsley of Georgetown University, have studied near-accidents in aviation – where quick action by a flight crew, or even dumb luck, averted a disaster.

Success breeds complacency

When these “near-misses” are celebrated as a success, the researchers say, it tends to breed complacency within the system. In the case of US Airways Flight 1549, an over-abundance of large birds around New York airports wasn't catastrophic – but could have been, and might be in the future to another flight.

“People have a natural tendency to see near-misses as successes rather than as indicators that something is wrong,” said Madsen.

He says airlines successfully learn from near-misses when two conditions are met – when the incident falls into a recognized category, and second, that category is recognized to have previously caused accidents.

It's when these almost-disasters don't fit into a recognized category or fit into a category that isn't currently seen as particularly dangerous that complacency can set in.

Use near-accidents to improve safety

The researchers says airlines should take advantage of these opportunities to collect useful, safety-relevant information.

U.S. commercial airlines are among the world’s safest ways to travel, but the researchers point out that close calls are almost a daily occurrence.

Their study cites an analysis of one month's worth of surveillance data at various airports. It shows that during that one-month period, situations where aircraft were considered to be within three seconds of possible collision occurred eight times at JFK, six times at Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport, five times at Memphis International Airport, and 21 times at Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta International Airport. 

On January 15, 2009 US Airways Flight 1549 took off from LaGuardia Airport and struck a flock of geese as the plane gained altitude, causing both engines t...

Article Image

TSA will stop surprise invitations to Pre-Check lines

For months, travelers in security lines at airports have been pleasantly surprised to find themselves routed into one of the TSA Pre-Check lines for expedited processing -- no need to remove shoes, laptop, and so forth.

But those days are over. The Transportation Security Agency is ending the program, which means that from now, you'll need to pay $85 and go through a pre-screening procedure if you want to continue using the Pre-Check lines.

The reason? You may recall that a few months ago, an inspector general's report found that federal undercover investigators were able to smuggle simulated bombs or illegal weapons through security lines 95% of the time. 

As part of an effort to tighten security, TSA has shelved the program, known officially as "Managed Inclusion II" so that the Pre-Check lines will once again be for the exclusive use of those who've paid their dues and undergone the pre-screening.

The $85 fee and pre-screening are good for five years. More information is available here.

For months, travelers in security lines at airports have been pleasantly surprised to find themselves routed into one of the TSA Pre-Check lines for expedi...

Article Image

Boeing creates more overhead storage for airliners

With nearly every airline charging a checked bag fee, passengers are trying to cram more and more into the overhead bins.

That creates problems for both airlines and passengers but the chore might get a little easier on new and retrofitted Boeing 737s.

Alaska Airlines is taking delivery of some of the new jets that feature Boeing's new Space Bins, which the airline says will increase the room for carry-on bags by 48%. Alaska says its the first airline to line up for the capacity-adding feature.

"Alaska is relentlessly focused on making the travel experience better," said Sangita Woerner, Alaska Airlines vice president of marketing. "We've been on a mission to improve our cabin experience for several years and Space Bins are part of a $150 million investment we've made to make flying more comfortable and enjoyable.”

By the end of 2017, Woerner says nearly half of Alaska Air's fleet will have larger bins to accommodate a carry-on bag for virtually every passenger.

Installed on 34 new jets

The airline said it will take delivery of 34 737s and one MAX in the next two years and will begin retrofitting 34 Boeing Sky Interior aircraft, primarily 737-900ERs, in 2016.

Other airlines are sure to explore this option, since all are wrestling with the space issue. Maura, a United passenger, posted this response from United Customer Service at ConsumerAffairs, when he complained that he could not find space for his bags.

“We strive to accommodate carry-on bags for the greatest number of customers possible,” the United rep wrote. “More customers are choosing to bring their luggage onboard, which could cause a shortage of storage space. Our planes have some of the largest overhead storage bins in the industry. When the bins become full, remaining bags must be gate-checked.”

Holds six bags

Alaska Airlines says very soon, it will have the largest overhead capacity. It says each Space Bin can hold six bags, two more than the current pivot bins installed on Next-Generation 737s with the Boeing Sky Interior. That's based on a standard size carry-on bag measuring 9 inches x 14 inches x 22 inches.

"We work closely with our customers to continuously enhance their airplanes so they can offer great passenger experiences," said Brent Walton, manager of 737 Interiors New Features for Boeing Commercial Airplanes. "We have a strong record of delivering value with innovative interiors features, like bigger bins that help reduce passenger anxiety about overhead storage and provide a better travel experience."

Improving acccess

When open, the bottom edge of the Space Bin will hang about two inches lower, so travelers can lift their carry-on bags in and out more easily. The deeper bins will allow more bags to be stowed and increase visibility into the back of the bins.

Alaska also says the Space Bins, designed without a flight attendant bin assist mechanism, will be easier to close.

Alaska Airlines said it is installing Space Bins on all its 737-900ERs and MAX aircraft currently on order and by 2017 will have 69 airplanes, or 46% of its passenger fleet, outfitted with Space Bins.

With nearly every airline charging a checked bag fee, passengers are trying to cram more and more into the overhead bins.That creates problems for both...

Article Image

City of Cleveland incurs wrath of FAA

The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) claims the City of Cleveland failed to meet FAA requirements for maintaining a safe airport during winter weather. And, if the agency gets its way, it'll cost Cleveland big: $735,000 in civil penalties.

“Snow and ice removal at our nation’s airports is a critical safety issue,” said FAA Administrator Michael Huerta. “We require airports to effectively manage this important responsibility.”

The FAA says that over a 15-month period ending in March 2015, managers at Cleveland Hopkins International Airport failed on numerous occasions to keep the airport’s runways and taxiways safe and clear of snow and ice. Federal Aviation Regulations require airports with commercial service to have sufficient and qualified personnel to carry out their snow and ice control plans during severe weather.

Three violations alleged

Between Dec. 30, 2013 and Feb. 25, 2014, the FAA began three separate investigations into the airport’s alleged failure to comply with regulations:

  • Early in the morning of December 30, 2013, two commercial aircraft were disabled on taxiways because of unsafe braking conditions. Regulations require airport personnel to monitor conditions and close any pavement areas that are unsafe. Freezing rain and drizzle had been falling for more than two hours when the airport allegedly dismissed its maintenance staff at 11 p.m. the previous evening. No airport personnel were on duty to operate snow-removal and de-icing equipment after the two passenger flights landed.
  • On January 18, 2014, an Aircraft Rescue and Fire Fighting vehicle slid on ice during a training exercise and was unable to stop before crossing a line that marked the entrance to a runway. An aircraft had just begun its takeoff roll on that runway, resulting in a runway incursion. The aircraft departed safely.
  • On February 25, 2014, airport management allegedly failed to follow the approved snow and ice control plan, resulting in unsafe conditions on the airfield. The airport was closed after one pilot reported poor to non-existent braking conditions.

Still missing the mark

After initiating those investigations, the FAA worked with airport management to update Cleveland’s snow and ice control plan. This included establishing new procedures and adjusting schedules to ensure that sufficient personnel were available to respond to inclement weather.

On March 1, 2015, icy conditions prevented an air carrier from quickly exiting the runway. Controllers subsequently canceled the takeoff clearance for one flight and told the captain of another flight on final approach to go around.

During this investigation, the FAA found that, even under the updated policy, airport management allegedly had failed on 19 separate days between Jan. 5 and March 1 to have the required number of maintenance and airport operations personnel on duty.

The city has 30 days from receipt of the FAA’s enforcement letter to respond.

The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) claims the City of Cleveland failed to meet FAA requirements for maintaining a safe airport during winter weather...

Article Image

Delta, American interlining agreement expires

If your American Airlines flight goes off the rails, don't go looking to Delta for help. The carriers' interlining agreement has expired and Delta is in no hurry to renew it.

"Interlining" is the practice of moving passengers and baggage from one airline to another. The usual assumption is that it will work out more or less evenly for both sides, but Delta says that hasn't been the case. It says American has been sending it five times as many passengers as it sent to American.

It all has to do with flight disruptions. U.S. Transportation Department data finds that nearly 84% of Delta flights were on time last year, compared to 76% of American's. And that, says Delta, means the numbers just don't add up anymore.

"The industry agreement was no longer mutually beneficial,” Delta spokesman Anthony Black said.

The expiration of the agreement means that, besides not handling rebookings for each other, Delta and American will not transfer bags and will not allow you to book travel that includes flight segments on both carriers.

American responded only indirectly to questions from trade publications about the situation, emailing a statement that said:

“While this is a change, it will not affect our commitment to re-accommodate customers during irregular operations,” she wrote. “The new American now has the world’s largest and best network and our team is doing a great job of running a reliable airline."

If your American Airlines flight goes off the rails, don't go looking to Delta for help. The carriers' interlining agreement has expired and Delta is in no...

Article Image

Forecast: holiday season air travel won't be any easier

Each year Dean Headley, Airline Quality Rating co-author and associate professor of marketing at Wichita State University, issues his outlook for air travel during the upcoming holiday season.

It goes without saying that the holiday travel period is busier than any other time of the year, but how airlines handle it makes all the difference in the world to consumers' wallets and stress level.

This year? Headley says seats will cost more and be harder to find. His advice is to book as soon as possible.

Challenging time

"During the past several years, the holiday travel period has continued to be a challenging time for travelers, and with industrywide seat capacity adjustments, it will remain a stressful travel experience," said Headley.

“Industrywide seat capacity adjustments” is a polite way of saying the airlines have managed capacity to ensure they fly with few, if any empty seats. They've also reduced competition through a series of mergers.

Yes, it's probably a good business strategy, but it can be very hard on consumers who have fewer choices and are often left in the lurch when a flight is cancelled or late. Unfortunately, that happens a lot during the holidays.

While industry airline performance quality has generally improved each year since 2007, Headley says high passenger volumes and the possibility of bad weather should always be factored into holiday travel plans.

Worst months for travel

"December and January typically have the worst on-time arrival percentage and mishandled baggage rates of any month,” Headley said. “The best bet for the consumer is to travel as early before the actual holiday or as late as possible afterward, and always leave room for schedule changes."

Airlines don't usually make major changes late in the year to compensate for the demands of the holidays. Take last year, for example. Headley says 2014 was a steady year of improvement for airline performance -- until December.

"Data shows performance scores are holding steady from year to year," he said. "We are settling in to a reduced capacity system that challenges travelers to be savvy. With strong demand for fewer seats and fewer airline providers, it presents an opportunity for the airlines to perform better, but also charge more for a ticket."

Pick your airline carefully

The savvy traveler should not only book early, but take performance into consideration when choosing an airline. Which airline is less likely to lose your luggage or arrive so late you miss your connecting flight?

Headley suggests taking a look at how airlines have performed when measured for quality. In 2014, he says the best performing airlines across the combined AQR categories were Virgin America, Hawaiian, Delta and JetBlue.

Hawaiian was best in on-time performance; Virgin America and Hawaiian were best in avoiding denied boardings; Virgin America was best in baggage handling; and Alaska had the lowest rate of customer complaints.

The worst performing airlines across the combined AQR categories in 2014 were Envoy/American Eagle, Express Jet, SkyWest, United, and Frontier.

Envoy/American Eagle, ExpressJet, and Southwest had the worst on-time performances; SkyWest and Express Jet had the worst rate of denied boardings; Envoy/American Eagle had the highest rate of mishandled baggage; and Frontier had the highest rate of customer complaints.

Each year Dean Headley, Airline Quality Rating co-author and associate professor of marketing at Wichita State University, issues his outlook for air trave...

Article Image

A delay-free month for the airlines

There were no -- repeat -- no tarmac delays of more than three hours on domestic flights or more than four hours on international flights in July.

And, that's not the only good news in the most recent Air Travel Consumer Report released by the Department of Transportation (DOT).

The nation’s largest airlines posted an on-time arrival rate of 78.1% in July, better than both the 75.6% on-time rate in July 2014 and the 74.8% mark in June of this year. In addition, the reporting carriers canceled just 0.9% of their scheduled domestic flights, versus the 1.6% cancellation rate posted a year earlier and the 1.8% the month before. In fact, the July cancellation rate was the lowest for any July in 21 years of comparable records.

The consumer report also contains information on chronically delayed flights, the causes of flight delays, statistics on mishandled baggage, and aviation service complaints.

Other areas covered in the report include flight problems, baggage, reservation and ticketing, refunds, consumer service, disability, and discrimination, along with reports of incidents involving the loss, death, or injury of animals traveling by air.

The full report is available on the DOT website.

A delay-free month for the airlines July saw improvement in both the on-time and cancellation rates There were no -- repeat -- no tarmac delays of more t...

Article Image

Report: non-invasive airport screening coming soon

One of the hassles of modern air travel is getting through security checkpoints. Since 9/11, the threat of terrorism has passengers taking off shoes, tossing bottles of shampoo, and submitting to countless indignities, large and small.

All that may soon be a thing of the past, according to an analysis by Frost & Sullivan, a global consulting firm. It says automation and pre-processing are reducing the human interaction with travelers during airport passenger screening.

It's just the first step, the analysis promises. Before long an assortment of portal scanners, biometric collection devices, and pre-clearance based on voluntary background investigations will transform the passenger screening process.

If true, it would be timely good news. Air traffic is increasing, making security checkpoints even more of a bottleneck. International Air Transport Association (IATA) expects global annual airline passengers will reach 7.3 billion by 2034, more than double from the 3.3 billion reported in 2014.

Escalating passenger traffic

"To deal with the escalating passenger traffic, airports need to implement swifter and more efficient methods of passenger screening," said Frost & Sullivan analyst John Hernandez. "One solution could be to supply passengers with alternate venues and automated tools to prescreen them before they arrive at the airport."

A risk-based approach to security is already in place, allowing screeners to focus on travelers who are perceived to present a security threat. However, not all policymakers and aviation officials are convinced this is a good approach.

To arrive at a more thorough system, Frost & Sullivan says airports are looking for innovative technologies capable of screening a large number of people quickly and accurately. It goes without saying that these scanners need to detect non-metallic improvised explosive devices.

"Airports already employ automated systems such as automated passport control kiosks and automated border control, eGates, for international travel," said Hernandez.

The next step, he says, is to transition automated passenger screening to airport checkpoints.

One of the hassles of modern air travel is getting through security checkpoints. Since 9/11, the threat of terrorism has passengers taking off shoes, tossi...

Article Image

FAA proposes civil penalty against Southwest Airlines

Southwest Airlines is in trouble with the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA).

The agency is proposing a $325,000 civil penalty against the Dallas-based carrier for allegedly operating a Boeing 737 that was not in compliance with Federal Aviation Regulations.

On July 9, 2014, an FAA inspector performed an aging aircraft inspection on the Boeing 737 while it was at a maintenance facility in San Salvador, El Salvador. According to the FAA, the inspector discovered that Southwest improperly recorded a temporary repair to an approximately nine-inch crease in the aluminum skin of the jetliner’s rear cargo door as a permanent repair.

The agency says the inspector discovered that this fuselage damage had first been reported in airline's maintenance records on May 2, 2002, which is when the airline made the temporary repair. The airline was required to inspect the temporary repair every 4,000 flights and complete a permanent repair within 24,000 flights.

However, the FAA alleges the airline operated the aircraft on 24,831 flights without performing the periodic inspections required for the temporary repair. It further claims Southwest operated the plane on 4,831 flights beyond the flight threshold by which it was required to have performed the permanent repair. The final repair was completed on July 24, 2014.

Southwest has asked to meet with the FAA to discuss the case.

Southwest Airlines is in trouble with the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). The agency is proposing a $325,000 civil penalty against the Dallas-based...

Article Image

Domestic air fares head higher in the first quarter

Getting from here to there cost you more in the first 3 months of this year.

The Department of Transportation’s Bureau of Transportation Statistics (BTS) reports the average domestic air fare rose 1.7%, or an inflation-adjusted $388, from the same period a year ago.

BTS reports average fares based on domestic itinerary fares, which consist of round-trip fares, unless the customer does not purchase a return trip. In that case, the one-way fare is included. One-way trips accounted for 34 percent of fares calculated for the first quarter of 2015.

Fares are based on the total ticket value, which consists of the price charged by the airlines plus any additional taxes and fees levied by an outside entity at the time of purchase. Fares include only the price paid at the time of the ticket purchase and do not include fees for optional services, such as baggage fees.

Averages do not include frequent-flyer or “zero fares,” or abnormally high reported fares. Constant 2015 dollars are used for inflation adjustment.

Inflation-adjusted air fares

First-quarter fares rose 7.9% from the recession-affected low of $348 in 2009 to the first quarter of 2011. Since 2011, first-quarter fares have shown little change, increasing 3.3% from 2011 to 2015.

The first-quarter 2015 fare was down 18.2% from the average fare of $475 in 1999 -- the highest inflation-adjusted first quarter average fare in the 20 years since BTS began collecting air fare records in 1995. That decline took place while overall consumer prices rose 43.1%.

Since 1995, inflation-adjusted fares declined 16.1% compared with a 56.0% increase in overall consumer prices.

U.S. passenger airlines collected 74.6% of their total revenue from passenger fares during the first quarter of 2015, versus 1995 when 87.6% of airline revenue was received from fares.

Quarter-to-quarter change

In the 3-year period from the first quarter of 2012 to the first quarter of 2015, inflation-adjusted fares increased 1.2%. In the 2-year period from the first quarter of 2013 to the first quarter of 2015, inflation-adjusted fares increased 1.3%.

The complete report is available on the Labor Department website.

Getting from here to there cost you more in the first 3 months of this year. The Department of Transportation’s Bureau of Transportation Statistics (BTS)...

Article Image

Flights return to normal after 400 weekend cancellations

It was a nightmare weekend for air travelers, as an air traffic control automation problem in the East shut down flights and had a ripple effect of delaying and cancelling flights in other areas of the country.

Before it was all over, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) said more than 400 flights had been canceled. The agency took to Facebook on Sunday to report conditions had returned to normal and it was working with airlines who were still repositioning equipment and personnel.

The chaos was traced to a computer glitch.

Statement

“The FAA is focusing on a recent software upgrade at a high-altitude radar facility in Leesburg, Va., as the possible source of yesterday's automation problems,” the FAA statement said.

The upgrade was designed to provide additional tools for air traffic controllers. The FAA said the new features have been disabled while both the agency and the system contractor complete their assessment.

“There is no indication that the problem is related to any inherent problems with the En Route Automation Modernization system, which has had a greater than 99.99% availability rate since it was completed nationwide earlier this year,” the FAA said.

The agency also said the problem was not related to hacking.

Disruption

ConsumerAffairs heard from one United Airlines passenger, Sonia of Palm Harbor, Fla., about how the incident disrupted her family's weekend plans.

“When I arrived at Newark, N.J., there were some problems with air traffic control and my flight was cancelled,” Sonia wrote in a ConsumerAffairs post. “This was distressing because my son was on his way to the Junior Olympics and was supposed to have been there that evening and did not make it.”

Sonia reports it took 18 hours to eventually reach her destination in Norfolk, Va.

Southwest Airlines won praise from John G. Hickey, who said the budget carrier did a good job of keeping passengers informed.

"Nice job SWA proactive information other airlines could learn from your approach," Hickey said on Southwest's Facebook page.

Shelli Mathews, however, had no kind words for Delta: "Worst experience of my traveling life. Never will fly Delta again. Oh, and I'm still in the baggage drop line," she said in a comment posted early Monday.

It was a nightmare weekend for air travelers, as an air traffic control automation problem in the East shut down flights and had a ripple effect of delayin...

Article Image

Senate report addresses airline fee transparency

Trying to pin down an airline fare is tougher than ever. Between fuel surcharges, checked bag charges, "enhanced" seat charges, change and cancellation penalties and pay-as-you-go drinks and snacks, who knows what a flight will really cost?

Congress has been hearing about this from the folks back home and a new report released today by the minority staff of the Senate Commerce Committee finds that ancillary fees are increasingly keeping consumers in the dark about the true cost of air travel.    

“The traveling public is being nickel-and-dimed to death,” said Bill Nelson (D-Fla.), the panel’s top Democrat.  “What’s worse is that many flyers don’t learn about the actual cost of their travel until it’s too late.” 

The report made a number of recommendations to create more transparency in pricing and Nelson said he intends to press his colleagues to act on the report’s recommendations when the Senate begins its work on legislation reauthorizing the Federal Aviation Administration. 

Preferred seats

In the case of preferred seating charges, the report found that consumers who purchase tickets through airline websites are sometimes only presented seats which require an additional fee.  In such instances, many travelers often pay the fee, unaware that the airlines will randomly assign them an available free seat at a later date. 

Additionally, the review found that consumers generally did not receive prominent or clear flight change and cancellation fee disclosures when they purchased tickets from airline websites.  In some instances, penalties for changing flight plans can double the cost of travel – even when the change is made far in advance of the flight.

Among the report’s recommendations:

  • Better and earlier disclosure of ancillary fees to help consumers compare costs among airlines;
  • Require checked baggage and carry-on baggage fees to have a clear connection between the costs incurred by the airline and the baggage fees charged;
  • Require airlines to promptly refund fees for any bags that are delayed more than 6 hours on a domestic flight;
  • Limit airline change fees to a reasonable amount tied to lead time prior to departure and an amount less than the original fare;
  • Mandate that airlines place clear disclosures that “preferred seat” charges are optional;
  • Require airline and travel agency websites to have a clear and conspicuous links to the Department of Transportation’s Aviation Consumer Protection website; and,
  • Update the Department of Transportation’s Aviation Consumer Protection website to better assist the flying public.

The report comes at a time of growing traveler frustration over airline fees.   According to one recent study, airlines around the world pocketed a record $38.1 billion in extra fees last year – an increase of more than 1400% since 2007.

Trying to pin down an airline fare is tougher than ever. Between fuel surcharges, checked bag charges, "enhanced" seat charges, change and cancellation pen...

Article Image

Online travel sites leery of new airline policies

It turns out there are a number of interested parties following the Justice Department's investigation into possible collusion among U.S. airlines.

In particular, it is travel-related businesses that have expressed some concern.

“We applaud the Department of Justice for its interest in protecting air travel for consumers,” the Travel Technology Association (Travel Tech) said in a statement. “There is less competition in air travel due to carrier consolidation. As a result, it is more important than ever that consumers continue to have the ability to effectively shop for transparent travel options across suppliers.”

The Travel Technology Association represents many of the websites consumers use to book travel, including Orbitz, Expedia, Priceline, Sabre, Amadeus, Travelport, Skyscanner, Airbnb, HomeAway, TripAdvisor, CheapOAir, and Vegas.com.

As such, it has a bone to pick with airlines that it says have adopted policies that restrict the availability of fare and schedule information in the marketplace.

Negatively impacting consumer welfare

“Limiting access to airline content through the independent channel – which provides travelers with the transparency and choice they demand – negatively impacts consumer welfare,” the group said.

In a study it released in May, the association claims that if airlines are successful in efforts to restrict access to flight information, ticket prices would rise more than 11% for leisure and unmanaged business travelers. That, I says, would translate into about $30 more for the average ticket.

“Preserving the competitive benefits of consumers’ ability to access comparative and transparent information on prices and schedules of major U.S. airlines is more important than ever,” writes Scott Morton, author of the study. “At a time when independent, transparent comparison shopping is most needed, some airlines are attempting to restrict access to their fare and schedule information, reduce the ability of consumers to easily compare prices, and drive travelers to their own websites, which do not offer price comparisons with other airlines.”

Statements by airline executives

The association has also expressed concern about recent statements by airline executives during a June round table discussion in Miami, hosted by the International Air Transport Association (IATA). The group of airline CEOs reportedly talked approvingly of recent actions by a U.S. airline to implement new discriminatory surcharges on consumers who choose to book travel through third-party channels.

“The events at the Miami IATA meeting may suggest a coordinated effort by the airlines present – and by the larger trade group – to promote and potentially collectively impose the surcharge,” Travel Tech said. “Those events raise serious questions as to whether the airlines and IATA departed from their obligations to compete, not coordinate, when it comes to the imposition of fares, fees and surcharges on their customers.”

Travel Tech is not the only trade group unlikely to volunteer as character witnesses should the Justice Department eventually bring anti-competitive charges against United, America, Delta and Southwest airlines – the objects of the probe. Others in the travel industry might prove reluctant as well.

Alarm

Earlier this month the U.S. Travel Association expressed “alarm” at the government's announcement of the airline investigation. Association CEO Roger Dow worried that the traveling public is already “jaded” about flying and hoped that, where the Justice Department sees smoke, there is no fire. Still, he says the airline industry has invited much of this unwelcome scrutiny.

"If not for the radical consolidation we have seen in the airline industry in the last few years, we probably would not even be having this conversation,” Dow said. “Now that 4 carriers control 85% of domestic routes, 'collusion' is a thought that's constantly going to be in the back of the minds of federal regulators.”

Dow says Congress could increase airline competition by making it easier for airports to raise funds for expansion. Many Wall Street analysts disagree, however. They says airlines have only recently become profitable by consolidating and, in essence, reducing competition.

It turns out there are a number of interested parties following the Justice Department's investigation into possible collusion among U.S. airlines.In p...

Article Image

SkyWest Airlines facing $1.2 million in FAA penalties

The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) is proposing penalties totaling $1.23 million against SkyWest Airlines for 2 separate cases of regulation violations.

In the first, in which the penalty is $911,000, the St. George, Utah-based carrier allegedly operated 2 aircraft that were not in compliance with federal aviation regulations. According to the agency, SkyWest failed to inspect the cargo door skins on two Bombardier CL-600 jets at required intervals. The inspections were required by an Airworthiness Directive (AD) issued in 2006 after cracks were discovered in the aluminum cargo door skin of a CL-600 during fatigue testing.

The FAA determined that regular inspections of that type of aircraft for similar cracking could help prevent a situation in which a cracked skin could lead to an accident or unsafe condition. SkyWest is said to have operated the aircraft on a total of 15,969 flights when the inspections were overdue.

Alleged landing gear violations

The FAA is also proposing a penalty of $320,000 on grounds that SkyWest failed to inspect certain main landing gear components on four Bombardier CL-600 jets at required intervals for wear that could lead to an unsafe condition or failure of a component. SkyWest allegedly operated the aircraft on more than 6,700 flights when the inspections were overdue.

“Safety is our top priority,” said FAA Administrator Michael Huerta. “We expect operators to comply fully with all FAA regulations and directives.”

SkyWest has 30 days from receipt of the FAA’s enforcement letters to respond.

The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) is proposing penalties totaling $1.23 million against SkyWest Airlines for 2 separate cases of regulation violati...

Article Image

Why flying will never be as comfortable as it is now

The future, when we are teleported great distances or fly around like the Jetsons, cannot get here soon enough.

But until that time comes we must all rely on commercial airlines, and the evidence suggests that isn't going to become any more pleasant than it is right now. The latest evidence comes in the form of a patent application filed by a French aircraft equipment manufacturer.

Zodiac Seats France has devised a way to cram even more passengers aboard a commercial aircraft. Drawings submitted with its patent application (PDF) show the reconfigured cabin, with the middle seat in each row facing backward. The company says that will allow current planes to hold additional passengers.

“Described are seating arrangement with at least one row having at least one forward-facing seat and at least one aft-facing seat,” the company said in its filing. “The at least one forward-facing seat and the at least one aft-facing seat are arranged adjacent to one another so that a shoulder space on one side of the at least one forward-facing seat overlaps with the adjacent shoulder space of the at least one aft-facing seat.”

Getting to know the person next to you

In other words, you'll get to know the person sitting next to you on a flight a little better than you ordinarily might.

Just because such a thing is being patented does not necessarily mean that airlines will implement it, but it is hard to believe that at least some won't. Airlines have rarely overlooked any possible means to add more passengers to planes without having to increase flights.

Restrooms are another area airlines have targeted for cost-cutting. While on-board facilities are vital to passenger comfort, they do not make a dime for an airline.

Marketwatch recently reported that Boeing is shrinking the size of restrooms on the 777-300ER jetliner. Doing so might reduce comfort for the 400 passengers but it will allow airlines to add 14 seats – whose occupants will have to compete for the smaller lavatories.

Airbus is reportedly planning to install smaller restrooms on its A320 to make more space for luggage.

Avoiding additional flights

Airlines clawed their way back to profitability after the 2008 financial crisis by adding fees for everything from checked bags to blankets and pillows. Now that the economy is recovering and demand for air travel is increasing, airlines are searching for ways to accommodate the demand without adding flights.

There is little thought, apparently, to raising fares because travel experts seem to agree that travelers are entirely too focused on price when they select a flight. Consumers want to pay as little as possible to fly, and are apparently willing to sacrifice comfort to save a few dollars.

The airlines may be about to put that theory to the test.

Photo © kasto - FotoliaThe future, when we are teleported great distances or fly around like the Jetsons, cannot get here soon enough.But until t...

Article Image

A tough month for take-offs

If you were in a hurry to get out of Texas by air during May, there’s a good chance you were frustrated.

Airlines reported 14 tarmac delays of more than three hours on domestic flights and 2 tarmac delays of more than four hours on international flights in May, according to the Department of Transportation’s (DOT)  Air Travel Consumer Report.

Ten of the reported tarmac delays involved flights departing from Houston on May 25 during severe weather. DOT is investigating all the delays.

Airlines operating international flights may not allow tarmac delays at U.S. airports to last longer than four hours without giving passengers an opportunity to deplane. There is a separate three-hour limit on tarmac delays involving domestic flights.

Exceptions to the time limits for both domestic and international flights are allowed only for safety, security, or air traffic control-related reasons.

On the other hand, the nation’s largest airlines posted an on-time arrival rate of 80.5% in May -- better than the rate of 76.9% in May 2014, but somewhat worse than the 81.8% mark a month earlier.

Other info

The consumer report also includes data on mishandled baggage, cancellations, chronically delayed flights, and the causes of flight delays.  

In addition, it contains statistics on aviation service complaints filed by consumers regarding a range of issues such as flight problems, baggage, reservation and ticketing, refunds, consumer service, disability, and discrimination.

Additionally, there are reports of incidents involving the loss, death, or injury of animals traveling by air.


The complete report is available on the DOT website.

If you were in a hurry to get out of Texas by air during May, there’s a good chance you were frustrated. Airlines reported 14 tarmac delays of more than t...

Article Image

United Airlines flights resume after being grounded

United Airlines flights were getting back into the skies Wednesday morning after being grounded for a few hours because of what the Federal Aviation Administration called an "automation issue."

The airline requested the action, reports said. It resulted in hundreds of flights being delayed or canceled worldwide. A United spokesman said a "connectivity issue" was to blame.

United has been struggling to complete the integration of Continental after the carriers merger last year. 

The Federal Aviation Administration has ordered all United Airlines flights grounded worldwide because of what the FAA called an "automation issue."The...

Article Image

Virgin America deploys upgraded in-flight WiFi system

Comedian Louis C.K. does a funny bit about a guy on an airplane upset about the quality of the on-board Internet service, not the least bit impressed that such a thing is even possible at 30,000 feet.

And since the majority of passengers tend to be like that guy, Virgin America is taking steps to improve its in-flight Internet service. It is teaming with ViaSat to increase the speed of the broadband service to the airline's 10 new A320 aircraft deliveries, beginning in September.

The Virgin America Wi-Fi will come from ViaSat-1, ViaSat's high-capacity Ka-band satellite that provides 140 gigabits-per-second Wi-Fi connectivity service.

Speeds 8 to 10 times faster

Virgin America says that the new technology will deliver Internet speeds that are typically 8 to 10 times faster than any other in-flight Wi-Fi system, so that travelers will experience speeds similar to what they have at home. That should provide access to more content, including streaming videos.

The airline says it will be the first to offer an in-flight Wi-Fi service that can operate in both Ku- and Ka-band satellite networks on the same aircraft. By deploying ViaSat's new hybrid Ku/Ka-band antenna, Virgin America says it can keep travelers connected virtually anywhere they fly, ensuring guests always have the best available connection in any given location.

"The idea behind our in-flight entertainment and connectivity offerings has always been to offer travelers more content, more interactivity, and more of the choices they have access to on the ground," said Ken Bieler, Director of Product Design and Innovation at Virgin America. "Since 2009, our guests have come to rely on and expect Wi-Fi access on every flight, and we've continued to improve our Wi-Fi product offering over the years.”

Free – for now

Installation will begin immediately, with the first Ka-band antenna equipped aircraft beginning service in the continental U.S. in September. During the beta period rollout the service will be offered free on the first ViaSat equipped aircraft. Pricing for the service will be disclosed next year.

ViaSat developed and tested its Ku/Ka band switching last year. The test flights, conducted in July and August on a commercial 757-200 aircraft, demonstrated the communications with the aircraft transitioning among multiple satellite beams from six satellites and three Ku- and Ka-band networks.

“For enroute airborne missions, seamless roaming on the best available broadband network can assure our customers continuous operation on a resilient enterprise network,” said Ken Peterman, who is the VP of ViaSat Government Systems..

Virgin America has been beefing up its entertainment package lately. In June it announced a new beta version of its Red in-flight entertainment system. That system includes higher resolution touch screens, Android-based software that will allow for faster, real-time updates, three times more content – including full seasons of favorite television shows, more interactive maps, and videogames which include classics like Pac Man and Asteroids. All of these features are available on a surround-sound audio system.

Comedian Louis C.K. does a funny bit about a guy on an airplane upset about the quality of the on-board Internet service, not the least bit impressed that ...

Article Image

Airlines' service, competition under the microscope in probe

Plenty of people have come to the defense of U.S. airlines after it was disclosed last week that American, United, Delta, and Southwest are targets of a Justice Department investigation.

All four carriers have confirmed that they are cooperating with a government probe into charges that they have colluded with one another on routes and fares, in a bid to boost profits.

It's true that the airlines are now turning a profit, thanks in large part to a host of new fees, but industry analysts insist the profits are hardly excessive.

"For the first time in history we've had air fares rising in real terms on a consistent basis," Airline Weekly Managing Partner, Seth Kaplan told CNBC last week.

Past awful performance

Kaplan says airlines' profit margins only look rich compared to how awful they performed in the past. Still, for consumers who have found air travel has become more uncomfortable and expensive as the number of airlines has declined, it's not hard to believe government investigators might be onto something.

Roger Dow, president and CEO of the U.S. Travel Association, said he finds news of the probe “alarming,” and worries that “jaded” consumers will look for alternate transportation or just stay home.

"If not for the radical consolidation we have seen in the airline industry in the last few years, we probably would not even be having this conversation,” Dow said. “Now that 4 carriers control 85% of domestic routes, collusion is a thought that's constantly going to be in the back of the minds of federal regulators.”

Airlines trying to limit foreign competitors

As the federal investigation gets cranked up, it has been revealed that three of the airlines – United, American, and Delta – have asked the U.S. government to block expansion into U.S. markets of three Persian Gulf Airlines – Etihad, Emirates, and Qatar Airlines.

In an interview with NPR Monday, U.S. airline officials charged that the three foreign carriers are subsidized by their governments and enjoy an unfair advantage against U.S. airlines – a charge denied by the Persian Gulf carriers.

Timothy Clark, CEO of Emirates Airlines, told the network the way to win in the marketplace is not to stifle competition but to provide better service.

“Investing in product, investing in comfortable seats - it's not difficult, gentlemen, making the consumer enjoy their products,” Clark told NPR.

Path to profitability

Part of the path to profitability for U.S. carriers has involved reducing the number of flights, cramming more seats into existing flights and requiring passengers to pay extra for things that were once provided as a courtesy. Dow believes there is a better way and it involves more competition, not less.

"Congress has a remedy at its fingertips: make adjustments to airport financing so that individual airports can raise funds to expand terminal space and allow new carriers into their markets,” he said. “More competitors significantly lessens the possibility that collusion can occur, and the pressures upon prices and service would be tremendously favorable to travelers, and therefore the broader economy.”

Plenty of people have come to the defense of U.S. airlines after it was disclosed last week that American, United, Delta, and Southwest are targets of a Ju...

Article Image

JetBlue begins charging for checked bags with some fares

Last November JetBlue announced the day would come when it would have to start charging checked baggage fees. That day has come.

The airline has introduced a tiered fare system with the lowest-priced fares assessing fees for checked bags. The middle fare allows for 1 free checked bag and the top 2 tiers allow for 2 free bags.

Travelers booking a JetBlue flight will now choose from several fare options, called Blue, Blue Plus, Blue Flex and Mint. The airline says the fare you choose will be based on what is most important to you, such as the number of checked bags, bonus points earned, and change/cancel fees.

Perks remain

All tiers will retain free DIRECTV and SiriusXM Radio and access to wi-fi. The airline says the new fare structure applies to customers who booked their travel on or after June 30, 2015.

Customers who booked travel prior to June 30, 2015, will be allowed a single checked bag free of charge and may check a second bag for a $35 fee.

Under the new system travelers who book the lowest-priced Blue fare may check the first bag for $20 when purchased during web check-in or at a kiosk, or $25 at the check-in counter. The second checked bag is $35.

On Blue Plus fares, one checked bag is free. If you check a second bag, you pay $35.

For those booking the Blue Flex fare, as well as the Mint fare, 2 bags may be checked without paying a fee. For all fares, a third checked bag will cost $100.

International flights

Some international flights carry some exceptions. For Blue and Blue Plus fares for flights to or from Santo Domingo, Santiago, Port-au-Prince, Port of Spain, Kingston, Cartagena, Medellin, Bogota, Lima and Mexico City: one checked bag is included and the second checked bag fee is $35.

The new baggage fees leave Southwest as the only U.S. airline that does not charge a fee for checked bags. JetBlue announced in November that it would move to the new system, largely under pressure from Wall Street investors who were growing impatient with JetBlue's lackluster profit performance.

Since domestic airlines began charging baggage fees in 2008 – which at the time was said to compensate for sky-high fuel prices – the industry has become much more profitable.

By the government's accounting, U.S. airlines collected more than $3.5 billion in baggage fees alone last year. Fees charged to customers in order to change reservations amounted to another $3 billion.

Last November JetBlue announced the day would come when it would have to start charging checked baggage fees. That day has come.The airline has introdu...

Article Image

Airlines improve on-time arrival and cancellation rates

Traveling by air was a little less aggravating in April.

According to the Transportation Department's (DOT) Air Travel Consumer Report, the nation’s largest airlines posted an on-time arrival rate of 81.8% in April, an improvement from both the 79.6% on-time rate in April 2014 and previous month's 78.7% mark.

At the same time, the carriers reported canceling just 0.9% of their scheduled domestic flights compared with 1.1% a year earlier and 2.2% in March.

Perhaps best of all, there was just 1 tarmac delay of more than 3 hours on a domestic flights and no tarmac delay of more than 4 hours on international flights. DOT is looking into the circumstances surrounding the delay that was reported.

The consumer report also includes information on chronically delayed flights, and the causes of flight delays, statistics on mishandled baggage reports and consumer service, disability, and discrimination complaints received by DOT’s Aviation Consumer Protection Division.

Additionally, there are reports of incidents involving the loss, death, or injury of animals traveling by air.

The full report is available on the DOT website

Traveling by air was a little less aggravating in April. According to the Transportation Department's (DOT) Air Travel Consumer Report, the nation’s large...

Article Image

Travel report suggests plenty of bargains for rest of 2015

With a very strong dollar U.S. consumers have found travel around the world isn't as expensive as it used to be.

A new analysis of global travel, by Expedia and Airlines Reporting Corporation (ARC), suggests that money-saving trend will continue for the rest of 2015. even extending to many U.S. destinations.

Specifically, the report analyzes average ticket price fluctuations on key international routes, travel demand and package growth savings opportunities and the impact of foreign exchange on air travel and how long travelers are staying on vacation.

At the beginning of the year, the two companies predicted international air fares would decline 2% across North America and Europe and 7% across Asia, a prediction they say has been borne out in the first half of the year.

How much you can save

How's the rest of the year shaping up? The report says the deals will get better. Specifically, it predicts travelers can save:

  • 22% on airfare from Malaysia to Australia
  • 22% on airfare from Italy to Portugal
  • 17% on air fare from Brazil to the U.S.
  • 17% on air fare from Spain to Thailand
  • 16% on air fare from Germany to Portugal
  • 16% on air fare from Japan to France
  • 15% on air fare from the U.S. to Dubai

The report also predicts that travelers who bundle will save even more. It notes that by bundling, travel suppliers have more flexibility on the rate offered and will offer better deals to achieve a competitive advantage.

"An analysis of air industry data suggests that, with smart planning, the second half of this year will be an optimal time to explore the world," said Greg Schulze, senior vice president Expedia Global Tour & Transport.

Airlines are adding seats

Chuck Thackston, managing director of enterprise information management at ARC, says travelers are benefiting as airlines modernize their fleets and add seats. That, he says, is resulting in lower average ticket prices, especially for North America and Europe.

"This additional capacity, plus other factors reported by Expedia such as length of stay and dynamic currency valuations, provides a great opportunity for travel deals this year," Thackston said.

After crunching the numbers, the report predicts travelers who bundle and travel between June and September will save up to $648 across all destinations.

Destinations offering best deals

For certain destinations, package savings for 2015 can be even greater. For example, travelers to London can save $1,424, or 30%. A trip to Maui, Hawaii will by 22% off, saving over $1,000. Travel to Paris should be 24% cheaper, saving $1,058.

Within the continental U.S., the report predicts you can save 23% on travel to San Diego, 22% on travel to Las Vegas and 20% on travel to Orlando.

When the report analyzed length of stay (LOS) for travelers, it found travelers on flights originating in the U.S. had the shortest LOS of all. The authors suggest that means – despite the strong dollar that makes exploring the world cheaper – U.S. consumers are opting to travel domestically on short trips.

With a very strong dollar U.S. consumers have found travel around the world isn't as expensive as it used to be.A new analysis of global travel, by Exp...

Article Image

FAA nails 3 companies for alleged hazardous materials violations

Three companies that allegedly violated hazardous materials regulations could face civil penalties ranging from $54,000 to $81,669.

In each case, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) claims the shipments were not accompanied by shipping papers to indicate the hazardous nature of their contents and were not marked, labeled or packaged in accordance with the federal regs.

The companies also allegedly failed to provide emergency response information and ensure their employees received required hazardous materials training.

DGI Menard

The FAA contends that on Jan. 12, 2015, DGI Menard knowingly offered an undeclared hazardous material shipment to FedEx for air transport from Carnegie, Pa., to Crystal Lake, Ill. The shipment included 8 1-pint cans of Lubemaster’s Fire Up, which is a flammable liquid, and 6 bottles of Diesel Mate All Seasons, which is a flammable petroleum distillate.

FedEx employees at the company’s sort facility in Cary, Ill., discovered the package was leaking and notified the FAA.

DGI Menard which could be fined $81,669, has 30 days from receipt of the FAA’s enforcement letter to respond.

Aqua-Chem

The FAA is proposing a $54,000 penalty against Aqua-Chem of Knoxville, Tenn, alleging that on April 3, 2013, the firm offered UPS an undeclared shipment containing 6 1-pint plastic containers of corrosive phosphoric acid solution. Workers at the UPS package sort facility in Louisville, Ky., discovered the shipment.

Aqua-Chem has contacted the FAA about the case.

Rust-Oleum

The FAA alleges that on Jan. 5, 2015, Rust-Oleum of Vernon Hills, Ill., offered 4 containers of spray paint to FedEx for shipment by air from Vernon Hills to Huntington Beach, Calif. Employees at the FedEx sort facility in Northbrook, Ill., discovered the flammable paint and notified the FAA.

Rust-Oleum has 30 days from receipt of the FAA’s enforcement letter to respond to the agency, which has proposed a civil penalty of $54,000.

Three companies that allegedly violated hazardous materials regulations could face civil penalties ranging from $54,000 to $81,669. In each case, the Fede...

Article Image

FAA proposes $58,600 civil penalty against FedEx

If the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), gets its way, FedEx will pay a $58,600 civil penalty for allegedly violating hazardous materials regulations.

According to the agency, FedEx accepted a box containing 1.7 liters of flammable liquid for air transportation in June 2014 that lacked the proper shipping name of the hazardous materials. The FAA further contends that 2 months later, the company accepted a hazardous materials shipment consisting of 2 pounds of consumer commodity that had shipping papers incorrectly indicating the amount of hazardous materials inside.

The shipments were not properly classed, described, packaged, marked, labeled and in the condition for shipment required by the hazardous materials regulations, the FAA claims.

Additionally, the FAA accuses FedEx of failing to provide the pilots in command with accurate and legible written information about the amount of hazardous materials on board 3 other flights in June, July and August 2014.

The shipments according to the feds, contained radioactive material, flammable printing ink and flammable and combustible paint.

The FAA says it discovered the alleged violations during a dangerous goods inspection at the FedEx facility at Bradley International Airport in Windsor Locks, Conn.

FedEx has asked to meet with the FAA to discuss the case.

If the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), gets its way, FedEx will pay a $58,600 civil penalty for allegedly violating hazardous materials regulations....

Article Image

US Airways nears its final destination

Like Amtrak and the late Eastern Air Lines, US Airways has been an East Coast tradition as often despised as embraced. Plagued by fickle weather, congestion in the skies and overcrowded airports, it has had more than its share of setbacks, delays, cancellations and complaints.

Consumers rate US Airways

Take Robert of Richmond, Va., who posted a ConsumerAffairs review recently.

"This is my second miserable experience with USAir in 8 weeks. Same airports and same flights in 8 weeks," Robert wrote. "First experience was a 24 hour delay from a trip that would have taken no more than seven hours of driving. This trip at this point is now going into it 9th hour. Sitting on the tarmac waiting for a gate to open and then being dumped on the tarmac 200 feet from the terminal entrance in the pouring rain. Now hearing at 11 pm that 'we have an aircraft but are trying to locate a crew.'" 

Time to spare ...

There are those who say that it was US Airways or one of its predecessors that coined the phrase, "time to spare, go by air." As a largely regional carrier for much of its existence, US Airways has had a lot of ups and downs -- lots of short hops that are more prone to disruptions than long-haul routes. This leads to lost bags, lost seats and, as in Robert's case, lost crews.

Consumers rate American Airlines

But all of that is about to end. Soon it will be American Airlines that inherits its customers' enmity. American, which merged with US Airways last year, says it will phase out the smaller carriers' operations beginning in July and possibly completing the process by October. You'll still see airplanes flying the US Airways colors after that but the reservations system -- the heart of any airline -- will be all American's when the switchover is complete.

Chaos has ensued in other airline mergers when the change to the dominant carrier's reservations system was made too abruptly, so American has chosen to slowly phase out the US Airways system, switching a few routes at a time.

Passengers shouldn't notice a change, the airline said. Uh-huh.

All-American becomes all American

It's perhaps appropriate that US Airways completes its journey via merger. It is, after all, the product of numerous mergers. It took off back in 1939 as All-American Airways, morphed into Allegheny Airlines (known in some road warrior circles as Agony Air), then took over Mohawk Airlines and became US Air. Somewhere along the line, Empire Air was added to the mix.

After a series of misstarts and aborted strategies, new management came aboard and changed the name to US Airways, causing the predictable jokes about the airline needing more than an airway to stay alive.

But stay alive it did, merging with America West to become a truly national carrier, eventually adding international routes as well.

When the merger is complete, there will be just four big airlines -- American, United, Delta and Southwest -- controlling 80% of the market. Welcome aboard.   

Like Amtrak and the late Eastern Air Lines, US Airways has been an East Coast tradition as often despised as embraced. Plagued by fickle weather, congestio...

Article Image

Fees keep U.S. airlines flying high

When the U.S. government reported domestic airlines' financial data this week, two numbers leaped off the page.

The first was the revenue collected from customers in 2014 baggage fees: $3.5 billion. The second was the amount airlines charged customers for making changes to their reservations. That was good for another $3 billion.

As an industry, the airlines in 2014 collected $127.4 billion in ticket sales, so baggage and schedule change fees added another 5% on top of fares, helping the airlines achieve a collective operating profit of $14.6 billion. That's up from about $8 billion in 2010.

Other fees not counted

There were other fees, of course, but they are not tracked by the Transportation Department. Baggage fees and reservation change fees are the only ancillary fees paid by passengers that are reported to the government as separate items.

Other fees, such as revenue from seating assignments and on-board sales of food, beverages, pillows, blankets, and entertainment are combined in different categories and cannot be identified separately.

When you isolate individual airlines, you see how important fees are to some carriers. Spirit, famous for the number of its fees, got only 63% of its profit from fares – the rest, presumably, in fees.

The airlines getting most of their profit from fares, and not from fees, were SkyWest at 96%, Southwest, at 95%, and JetBlue, at 92%.

Airlines began to add baggage fees in 2008, at the time justified by the soaring price of fuel. And it helped. Almost immediately after adding fees, airlines on the verge of bankruptcy began to show profitability again.

Now that fuel prices have declined, there has been no move to remove or modify fees. They are likely here to stay. But not just because fuel prices could go back up.

Hiding the cost of the flight

Charging fees allows an airline to keep its advertised fares low. Fares, after all, is how consumers usually choose a flight. Websites like Kayak.com make it easy for consumers to compare fares on dozens of flights with the click of a mouse. The difference of just $2 in a fare might sway a consumer to choose one airline over another.

When an airline knows that it can count on a certain amount of revenue per flight on fees, it feels more comfortable offering a lower fare than if it were counting solely on ticket revenue.

The problem for consumers, then, is selecting a flight based just on the fare. Without taking fees into account, you could select the more expensive flight, even though it had the lower fare.

A year ago the Transportation Department proposed new rules for the industry that would, among other things, provide more transparency by requiring airlines to post baggage fees, along with fares. The department has collected comments and the rule is awaiting final action.

File photo When the U.S. government reported domestic airlines' financial data this week, two numbers leaped off the page. The first was the revenu...

Article Image

Air fares on the rise

The friendly skies were a little more expensive in the final 3 months of last year.

Figures released by the Transportation Department’s Bureau of Transportation Statistics (BTS) show average the domestic air fare rose 2.0% in the fourth quarter of 2014 -- to an inflation-adjusted $393, from $385 a year earlier.

Of the 100 busiest airports, during that period, passengers originating in Madison, Wisconsin, paid the highest average fare -- $505, while passengers originating in Sanford, Florida, paid the lowest -- $99.

The BTS report bases average fares on domestic itinerary fares, which consist of round-trip fares, unless the customer does not purchase a return trip. In that case, the one-way fare is included. One-way trips accounted for 31% of fares calculated for the fourth quarter of 2014.

Figuring fares

Fares are based on the total ticket value, which consists of the price charged by the airlines plus any additional taxes and fees levied by an outside entity at the time of purchase. Fares include only the price paid at the time of the ticket purchase and do not include things like baggage fees, paid at either the airport or onboard the aircraft. Averages also do not include frequent-flyer or “zero fares,” or abnormally high reported fares.

Fares during the fourth-quarter fares rose 10.2% from the recession-affected low of $348 in 2009 to the fourth quarter of 2011. Since 2011, fourth-quarter fares have shown little change, increasing 2.4% from 2011 to 2014.

Historical data

The fourth-quarter 2014 fare was down 14.4% from the average fare of $459 in 2000 -- the highest inflation-adjusted fourth quarter average fare in the 19 years since BTS began collecting air fare records in 1995. That decline took place while overall consumer prices rose 37%. Since 1995, inflation-adjusted fares have actually fallen 10.8% compared with a 55.4% increase in overall consumer prices.

U.S. passenger airlines collected 71.2% of their total revenue from passenger fares during the third quarter of 2014, the latest period for which revenue data are available, down from 1990 when 87.6% of airline revenue was received from fares.

Annual fares

The average fare of $391 for the full year 2014 was up 0.6%, inflation-adjusted, from the 2013 average fare of $389 but down 16.2% from the inflation-adjusted annual high of $467 in 2000.

Not adjusted for inflation, the $391 average fare in 2014 is the highest annual fare since BTS began collecting air fare records in 1995 -- 2.5% higher than the previous high of $382 in 2013.

The complete report is available on the BTS website.

The friendly skies were a little more expensive in the final 3 months of last year. Figures released by the Transportation Department’s Bureau of Transpor...

Article Image

Airline service declined in 2014

What defines a good airline? Different consumers will have different opinions but most might agree that taking off and landing on time and not losing your luggage rank pretty high as criteria.

Beyond that, consumers no longer expect a free lunch or much of anything for free. Expectations have fallen pretty low in the last decade.

So it was interesting when Wichita State University and Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University issued their annual Airline Quality Rating (AQR). According to the rating, only 3 of 12 U.S. airlines improved their performance in the last 12 months. One held steady while the remaining 8 declined.

Virgin America on top

Virgin America came out on top for the third straight year, largely on its record of keeping denied boardings to a minimum. In other words, if you booked a Virgin America flight, you had a good chance of not being bumped.

Virgin America’s involuntary denied boarding performance was just 0.09 per 10,000 passengers in 2014, the best of all the airlines. The industry average was 0.92.

Virgin's consumer complaint rate is also lower than the industry average, perhaps because its mishandled bag rate was the lowest in the industry. Its lost or mishandled luggage rate was 0.95 per 1,000 passengers. The industry average was 3.62.

Virgin America's one decline was its on-time performance, a drop from the previous year.

Hawaiian Airlines

If getting there on time was your primary objective, you might have been better off flying Hawaiian Airlines. Its 2014 on-time performance was the best of the airlines that were rated. That helped make Hawaiian Airlines number 2 in the ratings.

Delta Airlines was the highest-rated legacy airline, moving up one notch from fourth to third place. Oddly, Delta moved up despite a decline in on-time performance, an increase in mishandled luggage and a rise in customer complaints. A drop in denied boardings was its only gain.

Of course, performance is all a matter of what you're comparing it to.

“The Airline Quality Rating industry score for 2014 shows an industry that declined in overall performance quality over the previous year,” the authors write. As an industry, performance in 2014 was worse than the previous four years. The AQR score for 2014 was a return to levels seen in 2009.”

Step backward

In other words the airline industry, after managing to improve since the recession, appears to have take a step backward. Wichita State's Dean Headley says consumers should take that as a red flag. For airlines, he says it means working harder to compete for customer loyalty.

“Bigger isn’t always better, and the downturn in performance suggests that customer perceptions of poor outcomes are warranted,” said Headley.

Study co-researcher Brent Bowen, dean of the College of Aviation at Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University’s Prescott, Ariz., campus, believes much of the problem can be traced to airline mergers and consolidations. He notes the airlines promised consolidation would improve service but that hasn't been the case. The one possible exception – Delta.

“Delta is an excellent example of a merger that declined in performance and systematically has clawed its way back to a new high level of quality performance,” Bowen said. “This shows that if an airline commits to improving their AQR rating, they can do it.”

Meanwhile, Bowen says the airline industry is doing quite well in terms of profits. It's evident, he says, they aren't investing in customer service and restoring employee concessions given up during the economic decline.

What defines a good airline? Different consumers will have different opinions but most might agree that taking off and landing on time and not losing your ...

Article Image

Air Methods hit with stiff FAA fine

The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) is proposing a $1.54 million civil penalty against Air Methods Corp. of Englewood, Colo., for allegedly operating Eurocopter EC-130 helicopters on dozens of flights when they were not in compliance with Federal Aviation Regulations.

According to the agency, Air Methods operated two helicopters on 70 passenger-carrying flights for compensation or hire, over water and beyond power-off gliding distance from shore, when they lacked required helicopter flotation devices and flotation gear for each occupant.

The company operated another helicopter on 13 such flights when it lacked required flotation gear for each occupant, the FAA contends. All 83 flights by the emergency medical transport company occurred around Pensacola, Fla.

“Operators must follow every regulation and take every precaution to ensure the safety of all those on board,” said FAA Administrator Michael Huerta. “Flying without required safety equipment is indefensible.”

Air Methods has 30 days from the receipt of the FAA’s civil penalty letter to respond.

The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) is proposing a $1.54 million civil penalty against Air Methods Corp. of Englewood, Colo., for allegedly operating...

Article Image

TSA Pre enrollment hits the 1 million mark

Still taking off your shoes and opening your laptop when you go through airport security?

More than a million people don't have to do that any more, thanks to their enrollment in the TSA Pre application program. The program, which opened its first application center at Indianapolis International Airport, now has more than 330 application centers nationwide -- including locations at 31 airports.

“The continued growth and passenger participation in TSA Pre affirms our commitment to the evolution of our intelligence-driven, risk-based approach to aviation security,” said TSA Acting Administrator Melvin Carraway. “With more than 330 application centers nationwide, it is easier than ever to apply for expedited screening.”

Eliminating the hassle

The expedited screening program that began in October 2011, lets low-risk travelers to enjoy a more efficient screening experience at 133 U.S. airports. TSA Pre travelers may leave on their shoes, light outerwear and belt, keep their laptop in its case and their 3-1-1 compliant liquids/gels bag in a carry-on in select screening lanes.

Approved travelers receive a “Known Traveler Number” and may utilize TSA Pre lanes at select security checkpoints when flying on 11 participating carriers: Air Canada, Alaska Airlines, American Airlines, Delta Air Lines, Hawaiian Airlines, JetBlue Airways, Southwest Airlines, Sun Country Airlines, United Airlines, US Airways and Virgin America.

Travelers may also enroll in one of three trusted traveler programs offered by U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP): Global Entry, NEXUS or SENTRI. Members of these programs are eligible to participate in TSA Pre and do not need to apply separately; once successfully enrolled in a CBP trusted traveler program, participants must utilize their “PASSID” as their Known Traveler Number.

As always, TSA continues to incorporate random and unpredictable security measures both seen and unseen throughout the airport. All travelers will be screened, and no individual will be guaranteed expedited screening.

Still taking off your shoes and opening your laptop when you go through airport security? More than a million people don't have to do that any more, thank...

Article Image

Airlines hit by numerous lengthy tarmac delays in February

If you were trying to fly somewhere -- anywhere -- during February, you may have had a tough time of it.

Airlines reported 16 tarmac delays of more than 3 hours on domestic flights and 8 tarmac delays of more than 4 hours on international flights during the month.

According to the Department of Transportation’s (DOT) Air Travel Consumer Report, 9 of the reported tarmac delays involved flights departing from Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport on February 27 during a snow storm. DOT is investigating all of the reported delays.

Airlines operating international flights may not allow tarmac delays at U.S. airports to last longer than 4 hours without giving passengers an opportunity to deplane. There is a separate 3-hour limit on tarmac delays involving domestic flights.

Exceptions to the time limits for both domestic and international flights are allowed only for safety, security, or air traffic control-related reasons. DOT rules require all U.S. and foreign airlines operating at least one aircraft with 30 or more passenger seats to report lengthy tarmac delays at U.S. airports.

On-time arrival rates

In addition, the nation’s largest airlines posted an on-time arrival rate of 72.8% in February, compared with 70.7% the year before and 76.8% the previous month.

The report also includes data on cancellations, chronically delayed flights, and the causes of flight delays, along with statistics on mishandled baggage, as well as customer service, disability, and discrimination complaints.

In addition, the consumer report includes reports of incidents involving the loss, death, or injury of animals traveling by air.

The full report is available on the DOT website.

If you were trying to fly somewhere -- anywhere -- during February, you may have had a tough time of it. Airlines reported 16 tarmac delays of more than 3...

Article Image

FAA slaps Southwest for alleged safety violations

Southwest Airlines faces $328,550 in fines for two alleged safety violations, including one involving a loss of cabin pressure during a flight from Boston to St. Louis.

The Federal Aviation Administration said that on May 13, 2013, a Southwest Boeing 737 lost cabin pressure, the cabin’s oxygen masks deployed and the aircraft made an emergency landing in Baltimore.

The FAA alleges that after the event, Southwest mechanics failed to complete a mandatory inspection to check whether the change in cabin pressure damaged the aircraft and to ensure used oxygen bottles were replaced.

The airline allegedly operated the plane on 123 flights before completing the inspection on June 3. 

Additionally, the airline allegedly operated the aircraft on May 14 and 15 flights with two of the four portable oxygen units unserviceable.

Further, the agency alleges the airline operated the aircraft on approximately 120 additional flights with a portable oxygen unit that did not comply with federal regulations. The FAA proposes a $265,800 civil penalty in this case.

In the second case, the FAA alleges Southwest failed to comply with Federal Aviation Regulations for accurately recording repairs in an aircraft’s logbook. 

On March 18, 2013, the pilot of a Boeing 717 operated by Southwest Airlines under the Air Tran Airways livery reported seeing ice and water coming from the jetliner’s galley vent. Over the next few weeks, maintenance technicians replaced several components in an attempt to correct the problem, which was traced to a faulty component in one of the aircraft’s air-conditioning systems. 

The FAA alleges that the airline failed to follow proper procedures in making the repairs and detailing them in the logbooks. And it said the aircraft was flown on several passenger-carrying flights before repairs were completed. The FAA proposes a $62,750 civil penalty in this case.

Southwest Airlines faces $328,550 in fines for two alleged safety violations, including one involving a loss of cabin pressure during a flight from Boston ...

Article Image

Airlines improve on-time performance in January

Airline passengers saw their chances of getting to their designation on time improve during January.

The U.S. Department of Transportation’s (DOT) Air Travel Consumer Report shows the nation’s largest airlines had an on-time arrival rate of 76.8% in January, compared with 67.7% a year earlier and 75.3% in December.

Additionally, the reporting carriers canceled 2.5% of their scheduled domestic flights in January – 4% improvement over the 6.5% cancellation rate posted the previous January, but worse than the 1.4% rate in December.

In and out

January marked the first month in which Spirit Airlines was required to report on-time performance and mishandled baggage data as it became a ranked carrier in those sections of the report. However, AirTran Airways no longer appears as a ranked carrier in the report as result of the completion of its merger with Southwest Airlines in December 2014.

Meanwhile, American Airlines and US Airways -- following their December 2013 merger announcement -- will report separately until DOT approves single carrier reporting and a single economic certificate is issued.

Other areas of interest

The Air Travel Consumer Report report also includes data on tarmac delays, chronically delayed flights, and the causes of flight delays filed with the Bureau of Transportation Statistics by the reporting carriers.

In addition, the consumer report contains statistics on mishandled baggage, as well as consumer service, disability, and discrimination complaints received by the Aviation Consumer Protection Division.

Also included are reports of incidents involving the loss, death, or injury of animals traveling by air.

The full report is available on the DOT website

Airline passengers saw their chances of getting to their designation on time improve during January. The U.S. Department of Transportation’s (DOT) Air Tra...

Article Image

Airlines flying high on low oil prices as passenger groups grumble

Airlines are quick to raise fares and slap on fuel surcharges when fuel costs are high. But they're not so quick to lower fares or eliminate those surcharges when prices tumble. This is starting to irk passengers.

“Because of the big airline mergers, competition has been squeezed out of the system,” said Charlie Leocha, chairman of Travelers United. “With only three network carriers, airlines now have the luxury of ignoring the market and maintaining high prices and low capacity.”

Right on cue, American Airlines reported today that its operating expenses fell 4.1% in the latest quarter to $9.3 billion, primarily because of a 17.3% drop in fuel expense.

It's time for airlines to fasten their seat belts and let fares begin their descent, said Paul Hudson, president of FlyersRights.com, a 50,000-member airline passenger organization.

“We have seen six months of steadily dropping gas costs,” Hudson said in a letter to 12 major U.S. airlines. “By any measure, the money saved by the airlines should be reflected in lower airfares.”

Clear link

Consumers rate American Airlines

Airlines are the ones who clearly established the link between fuel and airfares, Hudson said. For the past half-decade while fuel costs were rising, airlines were increasing airfares and regularly proclaiming the dire need for fuel surcharges, baggage fees and other ancillary fees.

“Our organizations are making it clear to Congress and the Department of Justice that the market is not working,” says Hudson. “Consumers should be hearing airlines crow about how airfares are going down and the number of flights increasing thanks to the low cost of oil. Instead we hear deafening silence.”

“Common sense says prices should drop when the biggest cost factor in flying nosedives,” adds Leocha. “This isn’t rocket science. Though economists can make lots of excuses, if there were more competition, consumers would be seeing lower costs to fly.”

“This is a clear consequence of near monopoly in the airline industry,” explains Hudson. “If the airline CEOs don’t take action shortly, Congress, the Department of Transportation and/or the Department of Justice should.”

Airlines are quick to raise fares and slap on fuel surcharges when fuel costs are high. But they're not so quick to lower fares or eliminate those surcharg...

Article Image

Southwest fined $1.6 million for tarmac delay rule violation

Southwest Airlines is being fined $1.6 million for violating violated federal rules involving long tarmac delays last January. It's the largest civil penalty a carrier has been assessed for violating the rules.

According to the Transportation Department (DOT) Southwest failed to offer passengers on 16 aircraft delayed at Chicago Midway International Airport the chance to get off the plane within 3 hours of arrival and failed to have sufficient staff available to implement its Tarmac Delay Contingency Plan.

“Airline passengers have rights, and the Department’s tarmac delay rules are meant to prevent passengers from being stuck on an aircraft on the ground for hours on end,” said U.S. Transportation Secretary Anthony Foxx. “We have aggressively enforced, and will continue to aggressively enforce, our tarmac delay rule to ensure carriers have adequate resources to minimize passengers’ exposure to lengthy tarmac delays.”

Southwest staffing problems

Under the DOT’s aviation consumer protection rule enacted in 2009, airlines may not allow tarmac delays longer than 3 hours on domestic flights at U.S. airports without giving passengers an opportunity to leave the plane. Exceptions are allowed only for safety, security, and air traffic control-related reasons.

An investigation by DOT’s Aviation Enforcement Office found that on January 2 into January 3, 2014, 16 Southwest flights experienced lengthy tarmac delays at Midway in excess of 3 hours. Southwest experienced a malfunctioning of its crew scheduling system and an unexpected shortage of staff, particularly the carrier’s ramp-crew, which inhibited the carrier’s ability to clear aircraft from Southwest’s gates in a timely manner to accommodate arriving flights. Severe winter weather at Midway contributed to the tarmac delays.

Prior to this order, the largest civil penalties were $1.1 million in 2012 and $900,000 in 2011. DOT assessed a larger civil penalty against Southwest because the lengthy tarmac delays involved more flights and affected more passengers than those in 2011 or 2012 (neither of which involved Southwest).

To date -- including this order -- DOT has issued 17 orders assessing a total of $5.24 million dollars in civil penalties for violations of its tarmac delay rules.  

Southwest Airlines is being fined $1.6 million for violating violated federal rules involving long tarmac delays last January. It's the largest civil penal...

Article Image

Fewer airline flight cancellations in November

Things got a little better in terms of airline flight cancellations during November.

The Air Travel Consumer Report released by the Transportation department (DOT) says the nation’s largest airlines canceled just 0.9% of their scheduled domestic flights during the month, compared with rates of 1.0% a year earlier and 1.1% in October 2014.

The on-time arrival rates, on the other hand, were a mixed bag. The reporting carriers posted an on-time arrival rate of 80.6% in November, versus the 83.5% rate in November 2013, and the 80.0% mark in October 2014.

Included in the latest report are data on tarmac delays, chronically delayed flights, and the causes of flight delays, statistics on mishandled baggage, as well as consumer service, disability, and discrimination complaints

The consumer report also contains information on incidents involving the loss, death, or injury of pets traveling by air.

The complete report is available on the DOT website.

Things got a little better in terms of airline flight cancellations during November. The Air Travel Consumer Report released by the Transportation depart...

Article Image

On-time airline performance slips in October

The top airlines in the U.S. arrived at their destinations on time 80% of the time during October, down a touch from the previous months rate of 81.1%

The Transportation Department’s (DOT) Air Travel Consumer Report also shows carriers canceled just 1.1% of their scheduled domestic flights compared with 1.4% in September.

Tarmac Delays

Domestic flights also got off the ground in a timely fashion. There were no tarmac delays of more than three hours, and just and one tarmac delay of more than four hours on an international flight. DOT is looking into the international delay.

The consumer report also includes data on chronically delayed flights, and the causes of flight delays, on mishandled baggage, as well as consumer service, disability, and discrimination complaints.

In addition, the consumer report incidents involving the loss, death, or injury of pets traveling by air.

The complete report is available on the DOT website.

The top airlines in the U.S. arrived at their destinations on time 80% of the time during October, down a touch from the previous months rate of 81.1% The...

Article Image

Consumers can expect crowded airports and planes to get worse

We're coming up on the busiest air travel day of the year. On the day before Thanksgiving, more people take a flight than any other day of the year, resulting in long lines and cramped cabins.

What if every day was like that? The U.S. Travel Association says it soon will be.

The group partnered with Cambridge Analytics for an annual study of the U.S. air travel system, assessing the adequacy of air travel infrastructure and the amount of airport congestion.

“The already bad news about our overwhelmed air travel system has gotten worse since last year,” said association president Roger Dow, in a conference call with reporters.

Nightmare scenario

The study tried to answer this question. When will we get to the point that the congestion of the day before Thanksgiving is found at every U.S. airport every day of the year?

“Compared to last year 26 of our top 30 airports will reach Thanksgiving levels in terms of congestion on a daily basis sooner than expected,” Dow said.

Dow says the only good news wasn't really very good. The airports that registered a slight improvement are already the busiest facilities operating at capacity, like JFK and San Francisco.

“Everywhere else the news is pretty horrible,” he said. “Some places like Dallas-Fort Worth, Denver, Newark, Reagan Airport in DC will now get to the Thanksgiving level tipping point decades sooner than we projected last year.”

Demand still growing

The problem is getting worse because of the steady increase in passenger demand for air travel. But instead of improving airports and systems to keep up with demand, Dow says the can is getting kicked down the road.

“The point of doing all of this is to demonstrate to our political leaders the urgent need for action,” Dow said.

And it's more than a matter of inconvenience for the traveling public. Dow says jobs and economic growth are at stake because the U.S. system is losing ground as the rest of the world has improved.

“Today not a single U.S. airport is ranked in the Top 25 world wide,” he said.

Airlines not helping

At a time when airport infrastructure is in a holding pattern, it should be noted that the airlines are not doing a lot to make flying more pleasant. As demand has increased, airlines have trimmed capacity to try and more exactly meet demand by limiting flights and destinations.

The same day Dow briefed reporters on the state of U.S. airports, United Continental CEO Jeff Smisek, in an interview with CNBC, was unapologetic about crowded planes.

“It would be great to get on an airplane and be the only passenger. You'd have a huge spacious cabin to yourself. But nobody could make money with that,” Smisek said. “What we're doing is turning this into a business. Now I understand that people would like to have an empty middle seat and we'd be happy to sell them that empty middle seat if they'd be willing to pay for it. Although they value it, they're not willing to pay for it.”

His comments add to the gloomy outlook for consumers when it comes to air travel. While the Air Travel Association study sees a rather small increase in air travel demand in the next year – around 2% – Dow says that increase will present huge problems for the system.

“It's dire because we're already at capacity at so many airports,” he said. “You begin looking at the delays that work their way across the country every day, passengers tell us right now, with zero growth, the cancellations, the delayed flights are a nightmare.”

We're coming up on the busiest air travel day of the year. On the day before Thanksgiving, more people take a flight than any other day of the year, result...

Article Image

Southwest, Virgin mix it up as Love Field goes national

For decades, close-in Love Field (DAL) has felt the love of Dallas-area travelers who dreaded the long haul out to Dallas-Fort Worth International Airport (DFW).

But lovely though it may have been, Love Field had one big drawback: it was restricted to relatively short-haul flights, thanks to something called the Wright Amendment. That has finally changed; federal limits imposed by the amendment expired yesterday and low-cost carriers Southwest and Virgin America lost no time going wheels up to such once-forbidden destinations as New York and Washington.

This presents a potential headache for DFW-based American Airlines, only recently emerged from bankruptcy and still digesting its acquisition of US Airways. 

Love Field's in-town location makes it attractive to business travelers, as do the lower fares and booking policies of Southwest and Virgin. Virgin's extra-plush first class section, priced below many competitors' business class, may also be attractive to long tall Texans yearning for a little breathing space.

Made lemonade

The Wright Amendment, the brainchild of then-Rep. Jim Wright (D-Texas) was imposed in 1979 and was intended to spur development of DFW, which opened in 1974 and languished for its first years. The amendment limited Love Field flights to in-state and nearby destinations. 

Southwest made lemonade from the sour restriction, fashioning itself as an upstart giant killer, offering cheap and frequent flights from Love Field to just about anywhere for anyone willing to change planes once the eyes of Texas were no longer upon them. 

"After 34 long years, Southwest now has the right to spread our low fares, our friendly policies, our Fun-LUVing Attitudes, and Legendary Customer Service," said Gary Kelly, Southwest Airlines Chairman, President, and Chief Executive Officer. "Most importantly, we have the right to spread our LOVE across the United States anywhere we want to fly nonstop from our home airport, and our hometown, Dallas, Texas."

Southwest began nonstop flights from DAL to 17 new destinations yesterday:

  • Denver
  • Chicago (Midway)
  • Baltimore/Washington
  • Washington, D.C. (Reagan National)
  • Las Vegas
  • Los Angeles (LAX)
  • Orlando

Beginning November 2, 2014, Southwest Airlines will continue its rollout of new nonstop flights from Love Field to:

  • Phoenix
  • Orange County/Santa Ana
  • San Diego
  • Tampa Bay
  • Ft. Lauderdale
  • New York City (LaGuardia)
  • Atlanta
  • Nashville

Beginning January 6, 2015:

  • San Francisco (SFO)
  • Oakland (OAK)

Virgin's Texas-sized deals

Virgin America celebrated with the launch of three daily nonstop flights from DAL to Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport (DCA), Los Angeles International Airport (LAX) and San Francisco International Airport (SFO), and starting on October 28th, four daily nonstop flights from DAL to New York's LaGuardia Airport (LGA).  

The airline will be the only carrier at Love Field to offer three classes of service in these markets – including a First Class cabin and a Main Cabin Select premium economy service – as well as fleetwide WiFi, power outlets at every seat, a full-service food menu, confirmed seating and personal seatback entertainment for every guest.  

For decades, close-in Love Field (DAL) has felt the love of Dallas-area travelers who dreaded the long haul out to Dallas-Fort Worth International Airport...

Article Image

Just one domestic airline tarmac delay in August -- and none for international flights

When it comes to getting off the ground on time, August was a very good month.

The nation’s largest airlines reported just 1 tarmac delay of more than 3 hours on a domestic flight, which is under investigation, and no tarmac delays of more than 4 hours on international flights.

According to the Department of Transportation’s (DOT) Air Travel Consumer Report, the carriers also posted an on-time arrival rate of 77.7% in August, while that's down 1.1% from a year earlier, it's 2.1% above the mark posted in July.

In addition, the reporting carriers canceled 1.2% of their scheduled domestic flights, down 0.4% from the month before and up 0.4% from the cancellation rate posted in August 2013.

The consumer report also contains data on chronically delayed flights, and the causes of flight delays, along with information on mishandled baggage reports filed by consumers with the carriers and consumer service, disability, and discrimination complaints.

The complete report is available on the DOT website

When it comes to getting off the ground on time, August was a very good month. The nation’s largest airlines reported just 1 tarmac delay of more than 3 h...

Article Image

Alleged hazardous materials violations could draw FAA fines

Three companies accused of violating Hazardous Materials Regulations are facing civil penalties ranging from $54,000 to $65,000.

In each case, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) alleges packages that were shipped were not declared to contain hazardous materials and the materials offered were not properly classed, described, packaged, marked, labeled and in proper condition for shipment under the Hazardous Materials Regulations.

The cases are as follows:

FedEx

$65,000 against FedEx Corp. of Memphis, Tenn. The FAA contends that on Jan. 10, 2014, a FedEx employee in Austin, Texas, improperly accepted a cardboard box containing two one-gallon cans of Tuffy Fast Dry F.F. Blue Paint for shipment aboard a FedEx aircraft. The shipment was destined for Fort Smith, Ark. One of the cans leaked during transit.

According to Department of Transportation (DOT) regulations, paint is considered to be a hazardous material. The FAA alleges the FedEx employee who accepted the shipment failed to inspect the package as required by regulations.

FedEx is scheduled to meet with the FAA in late October to discuss the case.

Linvin

$57,600 against Linvin, LLC, of Austin, Texas. The FAA alleges that on April 5, 2014, a Linvin employee offered an undeclared shipment containing a one-quart container of denatured alcohol and a 15.5-ounce aerosol can of dust-removing spray in checked baggage to American Airlines for transport from Chicago O’Hare International Airport to Austin Bergstrom International Airport in Texas.

Under DOT regulations, denatured alcohol is considered to be a flammable liquid and dust-removing spray is considered to be a flammable aerosol. The Transportation Security Administration discovered the hazardous material.

Linvin has requested a meeting with the FAA to discuss the case.

Allied Technology Group

$54,000 against Allied Technology Group of Rockville, Md. The FAA alleges that on Jan. 21, 2014, Allied Technology offered a fiberboard box containing a 14.5-ounce can of electrical coating to Southwest Airlines for shipment from Amarillo, Texas, to Las Vegas, Nev.

According to federal regulations, electrical coating is considered to be a flammable liquid. The shipment was discovered during baggage sorting operations at Rick Husband Amarillo International Airport.

Allied Technology has requested to meet with the FAA to discuss the case.

Three companies accused of violating Hazardous Materials Regulations are facing civil penalties ranging from $54,000 to $65,000. In each case, the Federa...

Article Image

Airlines improved their on-time performance in July

The chances of your flight arriving on time showed considerable improvement in July.

According to the Transportation Department’s (DOT) Air Travel Consumer Report, the nation’s largest airlines posted an on-time arrival rate of 75.6% in July, compared with June's 71.8% mark and a 73.1% on-time rate in July 2013.

In addition, the carriers reported canceling 1.6% of their scheduled domestic flights in July, versus a 2.0% rate in June and 1.7% a year earlier.

As for tarmac delays, airlines reported two of them lasting more than three hours on domestic flights and no tarmac delays of more than four hours on international flights. DOT is investigating the domestic delays.

The full report, which is available on the DOT website, also includes data on tarmac delays, chronically delayed flights, and the causes of flight delays filed with the Bureau of Transportation Statistics (BTS) by the reporting carriers.

In addition, the report contains information on mishandled baggage reports filed by consumers with the carriers and consumer service, disability, and discrimination complaints received by DOT’s Aviation Consumer Protection Division.

Reports of incidents involving the loss, death, or injury of pets traveling by air, are included as well.

The chances of your flight arriving on time showed considerable improvement in July. According to the Transportation Department’s (DOT) Air Travel Consume...

Article Image

It's getting harder to know the true cost of traveling

A New York University (NYU) professor's study of hotel fees has gotten a lot of attention this week. Bjorn Hanson, clinical professor at the NYU School of Professional Studies, reported what a lot of travelers already know – hotels have gotten into the fee game.

Just like airlines, Hanson says hotels have begun to charge a fee for things that were once considered part of the nightly room rate. By Hanson's tally, the hotel industry collected $2.1 billion in fees and surcharges last year and is on track to surpass that this year.

Travelers now face routine fees like resort or amenity fees, early departure fees, early reservation cancellation fees, and sometimes even a charge for an in-room safe, even if it isn't used. One hotel charges $75 for receiving a Federal Express or UPS delivery at the front desk.

Why not just charge what it costs?

Though hotels have always tacked on fees for things like restocking the mini-bar, the airline industry is generally credited with laying on the fees in order to stay profitable. But if hotels and airlines just raised rates and fares to reflect the market value, the fees wouldn't be necessary.

Consider an air fare that cost $250 in 1978, when the industry was still regulated. Just adjusting for inflation, that fare should be $913.54 today. But it isn't. At the most, it might be $500. By adding fees, the airline gets it closer to the inflation adjusted number.

Hanson says there are a number of reasons airlines and hotels don't just charge the real price.

“Most guests are highly rate sensitive - $2.00 causes a shift in market share,” he told ConsumerAffairs. “Room revenue is subject to municipal occupancy tax, fees and surcharges are not. Most guests do not like to be charged for services or amenities they do not consume.”

Economist Joel Naroff, of Naroff Economic Advisors in Holland, Pa., agrees that the travel industry would much rather offer a low fare or rate, then regain the revenue through fees. A lot fewer consumers are going to book a $900 fare, even though they may end up paying close to that when all is said and done.

“Doesn’t matter what the bottom line is, for advertising purposes, it is the top line,” Naroff told ConsumerAffairs. “That is why the government made the airlines add in taxes to their posted prices, not simply post the airlines price.”

Promoting transparency

In May the Department of Transportation (DOT) published proposed new rule making to increase transparency of airline fees. It would require that airlines and ticket agents disclose at all points of sale the fee information for basic ancillary services such as a passenger’s first checked bag, second checked bag, carry-on item and advance seat selection.

Still, the airlines will continue to advertise fares that seem low and hotels will offer what might appear to be bargains on an overnight stay. And while Spirit Airlines is often accused of being over-the-top when it comes to fees, the airline defends its practice as giving consumers who don't need any extra services a very low fare. The fact that its planes are usually full might indicate there are plenty of consumers who agree with it.

So consumers must carefully read between the lines when considering what airline to fly and what hotel to book. It's more work for you because Naroff says hotels and airlines are highly unlikely to just give you a single price.

“Remember, it is not what you pay but what you think you are paying that matters to people selling goods,” he said. “Once they have you, they then can make you pay through the nose, but they need to get you there first!”

A New York University (NYU) professor's study of hotel fees has gotten a lot of attention this week. Bjorn Hanson, clinical professor at the NYU School of...

Article Image

Airlines find clear runways in June

After struggling with tarmac delays, flight cancellations and late arrivals in May, air travelers enjoyed a pretty good June.

There were NO reported tarmac delays of more than three hours on domestic flights and only one of more than four hours on an international flight that month, according to the Transportation Department's (DOT) latest Air Travel Consumer Report.

During May, the airlines reported 4 tarmac delays of more than 3 hours on domestic flights and 1 tarmac delay of more than 4 hours on an international flight.

Also during June, the 14 airlines that file their on-time performance data with DOT reported that 71.8% of their flights arrived on time in June, virtually the same as for June 2013 but worse than the 76.9% mark in May 2014.

The consumer report also includes information on cancellations, chronically delayed flights, and the causes of flight delays, as well as data on airline bumping, mishandled baggage reports filed by consumers with the carriers, and consumer service, disability, and discrimination complaints. Reports of incidents involving the loss, death, or injury of pets traveling by air, are also included.

The full report is available on the DOT website.

After struggling with tarmac delays, flight cancellations and late arrivals in May, air travelers enjoyed a pretty good June. There were NO reported tarma...

Article Image

Study: Lap infants at increased risk of death on airline flights

In-flight deaths of babies are rare but researchers say they've found that lap infants may be at greater risk of death on commercial flights than other babies.

The study analyzed pediatric medical emergencies on flights worldwide between January 2010 and June 2013 and found 90 percent of deaths occurred in children under the age of 2.

"The pattern we identified in our analysis is intriguing and could indicate lap infants are at greater risk of death related to in-flight environmental factors such as sleeping arrangements," says Alexandre Rotta, MD, Chief, Division of Pediatric Critical Care Medicine at

"The pattern we identified in our analysis is intriguing and could indicate lap infants are at greater risk of death related to in-flight environmental factors such as sleeping arrangements," said Alexandre Rotta, MD, Professor of Pediatrics at Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine.

Could have gone unnoticed

The pattern would have gone unnoticed through single case analysis of these relatively rare events, Rotta said. Rotta was the lead investigator on the study, which was conducted at University Hospitals Rainbow Babies & Children's Hospital in Cleveland.

The study was conducted in partnership with MedAire to characterize the rare event of an in-flight pediatric fatality onboard commercial airline flights worldwide. Through a detailed analysis of more than 7,000 reported medical emergencies involving children (newborn to age 18) over a three-year period, researchers found death most commonly occurred in previously healthy children under the age of 2, and in children with a preexisting medical condition.

The fatalities were identified by searching records of all in-flight medical emergencies for child passengers that were reported to MedAire, which provides ground-based medical support to commercial airlines worldwide.

Of the 7,573 reported emergencies, 10 resulted in death, and six had no previous medical history. Four passengers had preflight medical conditions, including two children traveling for the purpose of accessing advanced medical care.

Hypoxic environment

Rotta speculates these infants were at increased risk from exposure to a hypoxic cabin environment, or by sharing a seat with an adult and co-sleeping during a long flight, but there could also be another yet unknown factor.

The majority of pediatric in-flight emergencies are related to infections, neurological conditions, and respiratory issues such as asthma, seldom require alteration of flight route and do not pose significant risk to life. Because an in-flight pediatric death is such a rare event, large datasets were necessary to capture a meaningful number of observations.

"I hope our findings lead to further research on this important subject," Rotta said. "It is my belief the pattern we discovered should promote the development of preventative strategies and travel policies to protect the health of all pediatric airplane passengers, especially infants."

The study was published in the Pediatric Critical Care Medicine Journal.

In-flight deaths of babies are rare but researchers say they've found that lap infants may be at greater risk of de...

Article Image

Airline industry sues TSA over passenger fees

This week, two airline industry trade organizations filed a court petition against the Transportation Security Administration – not to protest the agency's treatment of airline passengers, but the additional fees TSA is now imposing to pay for said treatment.

The International Air Transport Association (IATA) and Airlines For America (A4A) filed their petition in D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals. The petition, available in .pdf form here, “challenges TSA’s disregard of statutory text and clear congressional intent in improperly increasing fees for airline passengers.”

Here's a summary: ever since its creation in 2001, the TSA has offset its costs by adding a “September 11 Security Fee” to airline tickets.

The fee's amount is set by Congress. Last year, as part of a budgetary deal intended to reduce the deficit, Congress increased and simplified the TSA fee structure, with the new fees to come into force a year later, in July 2014.

Double the price

For a one-way flight, the old fee schedule charged $2.50 for a non-stop trip or $5 for a connecting flight. For round-trip tickets, the fee structure included a round-trip cap ensuring that the total TSA “Sep. 11” fee for a round-trip ticket is no more than double the price of a one-way maximum – $10, under the old system.

But as of July 21, TSA is now supposed to charge a flat fee of $5.60 per one-way trip with the round-trip cap in place; the maximum TSA fee for a round trip within the U.S. would then be $11.20.

The problem is that TSA is apparently ignoring the round-trip caps and charging that new $5.60 fee for layovers lasting four hours or more: if you take a one-way flight with two layover connections, you might be charged three times instead of only once.

As the IATA and A4A's petition says: “instead of honoring congressional intent and simply accepting the increased fees on one-way trips authorized by the Budget Act, TSA attempts to conjure up even more fees by eliminating the round-trip cap.”

The TSA is also charging these new fees on flights originating overseas, where the TSA does not operate. As the petition notes: “TSA has flouted the plain language of the statute by imposing fees on the domestic leg of trips that originate outside the United States.”

On May 6, Sen. Patty Murphy and Rep. Paul Ryan raised similar concerns in a letter (here in .pdf) they sent to TSA Administrator John Pistole; the letter expressed concern over the fact that the TSA “outlined a new collection structure that appears to omit the total fee cap currently in place for all round-trip flights.”

The TSA's own website says that the September 11 Security Fee “is now $5.60 per one-way trip in air transportation originating from an airport in the United States,”but says nothing about counting each layover as a separate trip.

This week, two airline industry trade organizations filed a court petition against the Transportation Security Administration – not to protest the ag...

Article Image

FAA wants to fine Southwest $12 million for maintenance violations

Beginning in 2006, Southwest Airlines started an "extreme makeover" procedure for 44 of its Boeing 737 airliners to prevent cracking of the aluminum skins on the airplanes.

But the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) says the contractor Southwest hired to do the job didn't follow the proper procedures and it is proposing a $12 million fine for Southwest.

The FAA conducted an investigation that included both the airline and its contractor, Aviation Technical Services, Inc., (ATS) of Everett, Wash., and said that determined ATS failed to follow proper procedures for replacing the fuselage skins on the aircraft.

FAA investigators also charged that ATS failed to follow required procedures for placing the airplanes on jacks and stabilizing them. All of the work was done under the supervision of Southwest Airlines, which was responsible for ensuring that procedures were properly followed.

Southwest returned the jetliners to service and operated them when they were not in compliance with Federal Aviation Regulations, the FAA alleges. The regulatory violations charged involve numerous flights that occurred in 2009 after the FAA put the airline on notice that the aircraft were not in compliance with either FAA Airworthiness Directives or alternate, FAA-approved methods of complying with the directives.

The FAA later approved the repairs after the airline provided proper documentation that the repairs met safety standards

“Safety is our top priority, and that means holding airlines responsible for the repairs their contractors undertake,” said U.S. Transportation Secretary Anthony Foxx. “Everyone has a role to play and a responsibility to ensure the safety of our transportation system.”

During its investigation, the FAA found that ATS workers applied sealant beneath the new skin panels but did not install fasteners in all of the rivet holes during the timeframe for the sealant to be effective. This could have resulted in gaps between the skin and the surface to which it was being mounted. Such gaps could allow moisture to penetrate the skin and lead to corrosion.

The FAA also alleges that ATS personnel failed to follow requirements to properly place these airplanes on jacks and shore them up while the work was being performed. If a plane is shored improperly during skin replacement, the airframe could shift and lead to subsequent problems with the new skin.

In the third case, the FAA alleges that Southwest Airlines failed to properly install a ground wire on water drain masts on two of its Boeing 737s in response to an FAA Airworthiness Directive addressing lightning strikes on these components.

The airplanes were each operated on more than 20 passenger flights after Southwest Airlines became aware of the discrepancies but before the airline corrected the problem.

Southwest Airlines has 30 days from the receipt of the FAA’s Civil Penalty letter to respond to the allegations.

Beginning in 2006, Southwest Airlines started an "extreme makeover" procedure for 44 of its Boeing 737 airliners to preve...

Article Image

May was a tough month for airline travel

The skies weren't all that friendly during May.

The nation’s largest airlines posted an on-time arrival rate of 76.9% during the month -- down 3% from April and 2.5% from May 2013, according to the U.S. Department of Transportation’s (DOT) Air Travel Consumer Report .

In addition, the carriers canceled 1.9% of their scheduled domestic flights in May -- up 0.8% from the rates posted the month before and the previous year.

Finally, the airlines reported 4 tarmac delays of more than 3 hours on domestic flights and 1 tarmac delay of more than 4 hours on an international flight. DOT is investigating the delays.

Reporting requirements

All U.S. and foreign airlines operating at least one aircraft with 30 or more passenger seats must report lengthy tarmac delays at U.S. airports. The larger U.S. airlines have been required to file complete reports on their long tarmac delays for domestic flights since October 2008.

Under a rule that took effect Aug. 23, 2011, all U.S. and foreign airlines operating at least one aircraft with 30 or more passenger seats must report lengthy tarmac delays at U.S. airports.

Other areas

The consumer report also includes data on chronically delayed flights and the causes of flight delays filed with the DOT’s Bureau of Transportation Statistics by the reporting carriers. In addition, there's information on mishandled baggage reports filed by consumers with the carriers and airline service complaints.

The consumer report also includes reports of incidents involving the loss, death, or injury of pets traveling by air, as required to be filed by U.S. carriers.

The full report is available on the DOT website.

The skies weren't all that friendly during May. The nation’s largest airlines posted an on-time arrival rate of 76.9% during the month -- down 3% from Ap...

Article Image

TSA thinks phones and laptops with dead batteries might be bombs

If you're flying into American airspace anytime soon, make sure your phone, laptop and other devices all have fully charged batteries, because as of last weekend, you must add “any phone or laptop computer with a dead battery” to the list of “things you can't carry on an airplane, or else the Transportation Security Administration will think you're a terrorist.”

That list has been in flux since the TSA first invented it. Back in the summer of 2005, all small metal grooming tools, such as tweezers and nail clippers, were banned in carry-on luggage, then they were allowed again.

Shampoo, liquid soap and other toiletry gels were initially allowed, then briefly forbidden altogether, then re-allowed provided they were in labeled bottles or tubes each containing three ounces or less, although that limit has since increased so that today, you can have moisturizer, toothpaste and other personal-hygiene gels in bottles or tubes containing up to 3.4 ounces apiece. However, for terrorist-prevention reasons those individual bottles and tubes all must fit in a plastic resealable sandwich bag no larger than one quart.

All carry-on electronics were banned for a day or two after Christmas 2009, during which time the TSA also imposed a set of rules governing passenger behavior during the last hour of a flight: hands were to be visible at all times, nothing was to be kept in people's laps, no reaching into your pocket or carry-on bag, and no leaving your seat for any reason.

Those punitive restrictions were soon rescinded. One year later, in October 2010, the TSA started requiring fliers in American airspace to submit to what it calls “enhanced patdowns” -- the explicit genital-grabbing all-body searches which, as a TSA agent admitted at the time, were deliberately intended to intimidate fliers into walking through the TSA's then-new full-body scanners instead.

And, of course, there have been the periodic TSA warnings against everything from shoes to cupcakes, all of which might, possibly, have the potential to be a bomb, or hide a bomb, or otherwise do something dangerous.

Old is new again

Hence the justification for the TSA's latest edict: if you are going to fly in American airspace and your cell phone has a dead battery (more specifically, if you show up with a device that cannot be turned on where a TSA agent can see it), they'll suspect the device is actually a disguised bomb, and then treat you as a suspect.

Hopefully, no terrorist or potential terrorist anywhere in the world is smart enough to disguise a bomb as an electronic device and then give it an actual working screen. But this possibility has already been considered and discarded by Jason Harrington, a former TSA agent who wrote in the Guardian that "the new airport cellphone rules wouldn't stop an iBomb" and warned that "the latest ad hoc security directive might actually make us less safe."

Those of a certain age may recall that this is actually not the first time the "turn on your devices" rule has been implemented. Long before there was a TSA -- back in the 1990s -- security guards at many U.S. airports used to ask travelers to turn on their laptops. Since this was in the Windows XP days, when a boot-up could take several minutes, it resulted in some pretty major back-ups and was eventually abandoned.

The story has generated many international headlines. For example: the U.K.'s Telegraph, on July 3, reported a “UK terror alert: body searches at British airports” with the subheading “New security regime imposed on passengers as American intelligence suggests al-Qaeda plot to use Western fanatics to bring down a US-bound plane.”

The next day, when the Express reported the news, it included warnings from a British travel agency, advising all travelers in the country to allow extra time for airport checks. The Express also said that the increased security measures were due to fears that terrorists might have an “undetectable 'stealth bomb'.”

"More like a physical assault"

Incidentally, both of those British news stories quoted an American tourist, Lisa Simeone, who was in Europe when local news reported the latest changes in American airport security rules. While Simeone and her husband were at Heathrow about to fly back home, a reporter strolling through the airport asked them what they thought about the new rules, and the Express said this:

American journalist Lisa Simeone, 57, said: “When I came through here last it was a cursory pat-down.

“This time it seems they are being a lot more aggressive and really groping people, it’s more like a physical assault.”

She said officials were swabbing belongings, clothes and shoes and even swabbed a baby’s pushchair.

No bombs or terrorists were found.

Simeone, a Baltimore resident and a frequent contributor to the TSA News Blog, is a frequent traveler who said she stopped flying in American airspace in 2010, when the TSA's “enhanced patdown” policy started.

“We used to travel a lot; it was a big part of my life,” Simeone said in a phone interview with ConsumerAffairs. The thought of never visiting Europe again made her rather depressed until she discovered that the Queen Mary 2 docks in New York and takes passengers across the Atlantic, so she and her husband got into the habit of driving from Baltimore to New York, taking the ship to Europe [it makes port calls in England and Germany], then flying back to the U.S.

“The QM2 is not expensive [compared to an airline ticket]; the problem is that it takes time,” Simeone said. A trans-Atlantic flight takes less than a day, whereas the Queen Mary 2 requires nearly a week to cross the ocean. “Not many Americans have enough time to take a vacation without flying.”

Latest American export

At any rate, Simeone and her husband said their vacation took three weeks in all, including the week they spent on the Queen Mary 2. Two and a half weeks into their vacation, Simeone learned, the TSA practices she sought to avoid in America had followed her to Europe.

“We were in Vienna, at the two and a half week mark, when the news reports started to come out: U.S. demanding other countries do this … I thought, 'Oh, my God, This is what's going on in the U.S., and now it's coming to Europe …. the U.S. makes an edict, and every other country knuckles under. They said the bomb they're looking for is 'undetectable,' but they think groping people will help them find it?”

A two-way ocean voyage from Europe to New York and back takes two weeks in all: as much vacation time as many Americans get in an entire year. “I work freelance, so I can take the time if I have to; my husband can't,” Simeone concluded glumly. She hopes the new regime in European airports proves only temporary, though fears that might be unduly optimistic: “The thing about civil liberties — once they're taken away, it's very unlikely you'll get them back.”

If you're flying in American airspace anytime soon, make sure your phone, laptop and other devices all have fully charged batteries, because as of last wee...

Article Image

Airlines improve on-time performance in April

Airline passengers had a little less to grouse about during April.

According to the Transportation Department’s (DOT) Air Travel Consumer Report, the nation’s largest airlines posted an on-time arrival rate of 79.6% in April compared with the 77.3% rate posted in April 2013 and the 77.6% rate the month before.

In addition, carriers canceled just 1.1% of their scheduled domestic flights that month. The rate a year earlier was 1.8% and 1.9% in March 2014.

There was even more good news when it came to delays. In April, airlines reported no tarmac delays of more than 3 hours on domestic flights and just 1 tarmac delay of more than 4 hours on an international flight.

The report also includes data on chronically delayed flights and their causes, mishandled baggage reports, airline service complaints, and incidents involving the loss, death, or injury of pets traveling by air.

The complete Air Travel Consumer Report is available on the DOT website.

Airline passengers had a little less to grouse about during April. According to the Transportation Department’s (DOT) Air Travel Consumer Report, the nati...

Article Image

Additional consumer protections proposed for air travelers

The disclosure of fees for certain basic airline services such as checked baggage is among the new consumer protections for air travelers being proposed by the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT).

“Knowledge is power, and our latest proposal helps ensure consumers have clear and accurate information when choosing among air transportation options,” said Transportation Secretary Anthony Foxx. The proposal, he added, “will strengthen the consumer protections we have previously enacted and raise the bar for airlines and ticket agents when it comes to treating travelers fairly.”

In addition to fee disclosure, the proposal would require more carriers to report their performance data to DOT, and codify the department’s definition of a ticket agent to ensure that companies that offer flight search tools and receive a form of compensation are adhering to the DOT consumer protection requirements.

Areas of coverage

Under the proposed rule, airlines and ticket agents would be required to disclose fees for certain basic, additional services associated with airline tickets at all points of sale. The proposal defines these services as first checked bag, second checked bag, one carry-on item, and advance seat assignment.

Currently, fees for additional services are often difficult to determine when searching for airfares and as a result, many consumers are unable to understand the true cost of travel before purchasing a ticket.

Fees seem to be a real bone of contention with consumers. Jeff of Indianapolis, Ind., says Frontier Airlines charged him $50.00 to carry on his computer bag because he did not purchase his ticket directly through the carrier. "This is a rip off," he writes in a ConsumerAffairs post. "To me Frontier is a bait and switch airline. They list their prices cheap on third-party websites but then snag you with fees once you get to the airport. Even if I see their prices $200 cheaper I will never fly them again; it's more the principle."

The proposed rule would also expand the pool of carriers that would be required to report information about their on-time performance, oversales, and mishandled baggage rates.

The proposal would also:

  • Require large travel agents to adopt minimum customer service standards such as responding promptly to customer complaints and providing an option to hold a reservation at the quoted fare without payment, or to cancel without penalty, for 24 hours if the reservation is made one week or more prior to a flight’s departure date;
  • Require carriers and ticket agents to disclose any code-share arrangements on initial itinerary displays on their websites; and
  • Prohibit unfair and deceptive practices such as preferentially ranking flights of certain carriers above others without disclosing the bias in any presentation of carrier schedules, fares, rules, or availability.

The disclosure of fees for certain basic airline services such as checked baggage is among the new consumer protections for air travelers being proposed by...

Article Image

Airline on-time performance in March shows improvement from February

The on-time arrival rate of nation’s largest airlines improved to 77.6% in March from the preceding month. However, it was down 2.2% from the March 2013 rate of 79.8%.

In even better news from the Department of Transportation (DOT), carriers reported no tarmac delays of more than three hours on domestic flights, and only one tarmac delay of more than four hours on an international flight.

The Air Travel Consumer Report, which is available on the DOT website, also includes information on cancellations, chronically delayed flights, and the causes of flight delays, data on passengers denied confirmed space (oversales/bumping), mishandled baggage reports and airline service complaints received by the Department’s Aviation Consumer Protection Division.

Also to be found are reports of incidents involving the loss, death, or injury of pets traveling by air.

The on-time arrival rate of nation’s largest airlines improved to 77.6% in March from the preceding month. However, it was down 2.2% from the March 32013 r...

Article Image

February was a better month for airline travel than January

Consumers traveling on the nation’s largest airlines in February had a better chance of reaching their destinations on time than they did in January.

According to the U.S. Department of Transportation’s (DOT) Air Travel Consumer Report, carriers posted an on-time arrival rate of 70.7%. That's better than the 67.7% rate in January, but worse than the 79.6% on-time rate posted a year earlier.

Even better, you didn't have to hang around waiting for your flight to take off. Airlines reported no tarmac delays of more than three hours on domestic flights and no delays of more than four hours on international flights during the month.

More information

The consumer report, which is available on the DOT website, also includes information on cancellations, chronically delayed flights, and the causes of flight delays.

Data on mishandled baggage reports filed by consumers and airline service complaints including incidents involving the loss, death, or injury of pets traveling by air are also in the report.   

Consumers traveling on the nation’s largest airlines in February had a better chance of reaching their destinations on time than they did in January. Acco...

Article Image

Should airline 'black boxes' be in the cloud?

The mystery of the disappearance of Flight MH370 is fueled, in large part, because we just don't know what happened to the Malaysia Airlines jet in the minutes after communication with ground controllers broke off.

Was the plane hijacked or did it suffer some catastrophic event? We won't know unless or until investigators can recover the “black boxes,” devices that are aboard every commercial airplane.

There are two black boxes, which are actually orange. One, the Flight Data Recorder, records the activity of aircraft systems. The other, the Cockpit Voice Recorder, records conversation among the flight crew in the cockpit. Located in the tail of the aircraft, these boxes can help investigators piece together the events that lead to a crash.

No black boxes

But MH370, along with its black boxes, is nowhere to be found, leaving investigators completely in the dark about what happened to the aircraft, and why. Some aviation experts have argued for some time that technology now allows this data to be available to investigators instantly, long before crews arrive at the scene of an air disaster.

"It's time to move the black box to 'the cloud' at least for essential limited flight recorder data for long flights over areas like the Indian Ocean, or other remote areas across large land masses like across the Brazilian Amazon," said Oliver McGee, former U.S. Deputy Assistant Secretary of Transportation for Technology Policy in the Clinton Administration.

The idea of remote flight data collection began to get serious discussion following the 2009 crash of Air France Flight 447, which plunged into the South Atlantic on a flight from Rio de Janeiro to Paris. It took two years to located the wreckage and retrieve the black boxes.

Time to enter 21st century

Mark Rosenker, former chairman of the U.S. National Transportation Safety Board, told Reuters the MH370 disappearance is all the more reason to find a way to record at least some of each aircraft's data in the cloud. It's time, he says, to bring accident investigation into the 21st century.

Some aviation experts say the technology to stream aircraft data to the cloud for real-time access already exists. Others say it's too costly for the industry to justify. But Peter Stewart, senior vice president for strategy and partnerships at technology firm PGi, says it should be a priority.

"We need to dig deeper into the technical details of retrieval and storage of cloud data systems, as well as, observe how other industries and firms have transformed how they store and transmit data," he said.

These technology experts concede the enormous bandwidth requirements to transmit constant, real-time data from an aircraft. But they argue limited data retrieval is possible, and is better than no data.

In fact, planes currently have the capability to transmit limited data about engine performance to remote storage servers. In the case of the missing Malaysia jetliner, there is no evidence any such data was sent or retrieved.

So, until the black boxes can be located and examined, what happened to MH370 remains a mystery.

The mystery of the disappearance of Flight MH370 is fueled, in large part, because we just don't know what happened to the Malaysia Airlines jet in the min...

Article Image

Airline on-time performance declines in January

 If you traveled by air in January, there's a good chance it took longer to get where you were going.

The Transportation Transportation’s (DOT) Air Travel Consumer Report says the nation’s largest airlines posted an on-time arrival rate of 67.7% in January -- down 13.3% from the 81.0% posted a year earlier and down 1.2% from December's on-time rate of 68.9%.

In addition, carrier reported 18 tarmac delays of more than three hours on domestic flights -- 16 of them involving Southwest Airlines flights that arrived at Chicago Midway Airport on Jan. 2. Due to a snowstorm, those flights were delayed in receiving an open gate. There were also three tarmac delays of more than four hours on international flights.

The report, which can be found on the DOT website, also includes data on cancellations, chronically delayed flights, and the causes of flight delays. In addition, there is information on mishandled baggage, reports of incidents involving the loss, death, or injury of pets traveling by air.

If you traveled by air in January, there's a good chance it took longer to get where you were going. The Transportation Transportation’s (DOT) Air Travel...

Article Image

Could the missing Malaysia Airlines jet have been hacked?

At the moment, there are more theories than known facts in the case of Malaysia Airlines Flight 370, missing for a week on a flight from Kuala Lumpur to Beijing. What's known is the plane disappeared from civilian radar shortly after leaving Malaysia ground control, on a course taking it over the Gulf of Thailand and Vietnam. It has vanished without a trace.

But numerous reports, including one from Reuters Friday citing unnamed sources, have begun to suggest the plane didn't crash in the Gulf of Thailand but made a deliberate course change and flew for hours to the west, taking it back across the Malaysia mainland. What the purpose was – and what happened to the plane -- remains unknown.

In light of this theory, a blog posting by Darlene Storm, published 11 months ago on ComputerWorld.com, makes for chilling reading. It's an article about a security conference in Amsterdam where HugoTeso, a security consultant in Germany, gave a presentation on how easy it would be to hack into the onboard computer running a modern airliner.

In the demonstration Teso set up a simulator to carry out the simulated hijacking remotely, without needing physical access to the target aircraft at any time. He explained that hacking into an actualcjet's computer was both dangerous and unethical.

Equipment from eBay

According to Storm, Teso purchased hardware from eBay that provided the actual flight code software for training. He was able to gain access to the plane's computer by exploiting vulnerabilities in one of the systems transmitting data back and forth between the plane and the ground. Here's the really chilling part of Storm's account:

Once he was into the airplane’s computer, he was able to manipulate the steering of a Boeing jet while the aircraft was in autopilot mode,” Storm wrote. “The only countermeasure available to pilots, if they even realized they were being hacked, would be to turn off autopilot. Yet many planes no longer have old analog instruments for manual flying. Teso said he could take control of most all airplane systems; he could even cause the plane to crash by setting it on a collision course with another plane.”

Teso's claims, which didn't receive wide coverage at the time outside the technology press, did not go unchallenged by aviation regulators and companies. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) issued a statement quickly shooting it down.

FAA says it's not possible

“The FAA has determined that the hacking technique described during a recent computer security conference does not pose a flight safety concern because it does not work on certified flight hardware,” the statement said. “The described technique cannot engage or control the aircraft’s autopilot system using the FMS or prevent a pilot from overriding the autopilot. Therefore, a hacker cannot obtain 'full control of an aircraft' as the technology consultant has claimed.”

Avionics equipment manufacturers Honeywell and Rockwell Collins also dismissed Teso's claims. Airline passengers can only hope they are right, because the German engineer has raised a nightmare scenario. If it were true, terrorists might no longer have to get suicidal hijackers past heightened security to take over an airliner, but from the safety of a hideout might turn a plane into a surface-to-air guided missile.

Could MH370 have simply been a trial run for a future, more diabolical event? If so, we'll know soon enough.

At the moment, there are more theories than known facts in the case of Malaysia Airlines Flight 370, missing for a week on a flight from Kuala Lumpur to Be...

Article Image

Experts say TSA scanners extra-vulnerable to security flaws

Anything controlled by a computer can be hijacked by a hacker, so it's no surprise that the various scanners which the Transportation Security Administration uses to inspect the luggage and bodies of would-be flyers have this same vulnerability — though it is surprising to learn just how vulnerable they are.

On Feb. 11, Dark Reading digital magazine, covering the Kaspersky Security Analyst Summit in Costa Rica, noted that the “Rapiscan” machines deployed in various American airports can easily be manipulated by outside attackers or TSA insiders in order to display false images. From a security perspective, this focused more on the possibility that terrorists might doctor images to make dangerous items appear innocuous.

However, in light of TSA's frequent history of false positives — to date, TSA agents have confiscated everything from a GI Joe doll's four-inch plastic rifle to a toddler's toy Star Wars lightsaber for presumptive national security reasons— it is perhaps of equal concern that TSA scanners could be manipulated to make innocuous items appear dangerous.

Though all computers are at risk of manipulation, the Rapiscan machines are designed to be more vulnerable than most. At the Kaspersky summit, Billy Rios, who is Qualys' director of threat intelligence, said that “The worst-case scenario is someone manipulates this in a way that the operator doesn't know a threat is in the bag ... by design, the [Rapiscan] software allows you to manipulate the image for training [purposes] … The TSA requires this super-dangerous feature on all of these baggage scanners.”

Rios reported some other embarrassing vulnerabilities he and other security experts discovered in various TSA systems -- for example, they could bypass login screens by merely typing a user name with a special character, which was then read as an error and resulted in an automatic login.

As Rios said: “These bugs are actually embarrassing. It was embarrassing to report them to DHS -- the ability to bypass the login screen. These are really lame bugs.”

Anything controlled by a computer can be hijacked by a hacker—some more than others...

Article Image

Bags fly free to the Caribbean this summer

Southwest Airlines today began selling seats on its first-ever international flights. The discount carrier begins service to Aruba, the Bahamas and Jamaica July 1.

Beginning July 1, 2014, Southwest Airlines will operate daily, nonstop flights between:

  • Atlanta and Aruba, and Montego Bay
  • Baltimore/Washington and Aruba, Nassau, and (twice daily) Montego Bay
  • Orlando and (Saturday only) Aruba, and Montego Bay.

Southwest subsidiary AirTran Airways will continue service between Atlanta and Nassau, between Chicago Midway and Montego Bay, as well as flights to/from Cancun, Los Cabos, and Mexico City, Mexico, and Punta Cana, Dominican Republic.

"Southwest Airlines democratized the sky from our first flights more than four decades ago," said CEO Gary Kelly. "Today's milestone enables us to reach new territory, new customers, and build upon a four decade foundation of doing right by the travelers who trust our value and our people."

Southwest is the nation's largest carrier in terms of originating domestic passengers boarded and operates the largest fleet of Boeing aircraft in the world to serve 96 destinations in 41 states, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, and five near-international countries via its wholly-owned subsidiary, AirTran Airways.

Southwest Airlines today began selling seats on its first-ever international flights. The discount carrier begins service to Aruba, the Bahamas and Jamaica...

Article Image

A surge in tarmac delays in November

The nation's airlines reported 11 tarmac delays of more than three hours on domestic flights and four delays of more than four hours on international flights in November. But you can't blame the carriers this time.

The U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT)’s Aviation Consumer Protection Division says all of the reported tarmac delays involved flights that arrived at Los Angeles International Airport on Nov. 1. The delays, which are under investigation by DOT, were due to a shooting at the airport.

A drop in complaints

DOT also says airline consumer complaints that same month were down 23.6% from a year earlier, and posted a decline of 11.9% from October 2013. There were 755 complaints in November 2013, compared with the 988 complaints filed in November 2012 and the 857 received in October 2013.

The consumer report, which can be found on the DOT website, also includes data on cancellations, chronically delayed flights, and the causes of flight delays, along with consumer service, disability, and discrimination complaints received. Also included are reports of incidents involving the loss, death, or injury of pets traveling by air.

The nation's airlines reported 11 tarmac delays of more than three hours on domestic flights and four delays of more than four hours on international flig...

Article Image

Why it's never been safer to fly

One can make the case that commercial air travel has never been a bigger hassle. There are security bottlenecks, crowded planes and fewer direct flights.

On the other hand, the chance of arriving at your destination alive has never been greater if you travel on a U.S. commercial jetliner.

On July 6, 2013 Asiana Airlines Flight 361, a Boeing 777, crashed short of the runway at San Francisco International Airport, killing three of the 307 people on board. The three fatalities were the only U.S. commercial jet aviation deaths in 2013, but what's remarkable about that is not the low number, but that there were any fatalities at all.

Previous fatal accident

In 2007 through 2012 there we no airline fatalities in the U.S. To find a fatal U.S. airline accident before that you have to go back to 2006 when 49 people died on a Comair commuter jet that took off on the wrong runway at Lexington, Ky., and crashed.

As recently as the 1980s U.S. airlines routinely suffered two or three fatal crashes each year, sometimes resulting in the loss of all on board. As recently as the early 1990s, however, the fatal accident rate began to fall.

Aircraft manufacturer Boeing compiles an annual report on airline safety. In its latest report it shows the annual fatal accident rate for North American airlines has been approximately 0.3 per million departures, meaning one fatal accident per 10 million departures. In the early 1960s the rate was one death per one million departures – 10 times higher.

Equipment and training

What's behind the dramatic and relatively recent increase in jet airline safety in the U.S.? For answers we turned to Michael Braasch, director of the Ohio University Avionics Engineering Center. Braasch says that today a variety of factors, including better equipment in the air and on the ground – along with better training – have made air travel the safest it's been since commercial jet service was introduced in the 1950s.

“The very first commercial jet aircraft was the de Havilland Comet,” Braasch said. “In the first half of 1954, two Comets, operated by the British Overseas Airways Corporation (BOAC) broke up in flight over the Mediterranean. An intensive investigation determined that metal fatigue was the culprit.”

Investigators soon learned that pressurized cabins for extended time at high altitude caused enough stress that the metal couldn't stand up to it. Over the years, lessons gained from other accidents went into improved systems and safety protocols.

Wind shear

In the past, weather was a major cause of fatal accidents. In particular wind shear – a sudden change of wind direction during a thunderstorm – could cause an airliner on final approach to suddenly lose all lift and plunge to the ground. Wind shear still exists but U.S. crashes caused by the phenomenon have largely disappeared. The reason is fairly simple; planes don't try to land when wind shear conditions exist.

“The weather radars, both on the ground and in the airplanes themselves, are excellent and the computer prediction models are too,” Braasch said. “The bottom line is that air traffic control – and the pilots -- both have much better pictures of the kinds of weather that are dangerous, thunderstorms and wind-shear causing storms, in particular.”

On April 4, 1977 a Southern Airways DC-9 encountered a heavy thunderstorm over Georgia. Hail from the storm knocked out both engines, forcing the pilots to try to crash land on a two-lane highway, resulting in 72 deaths. Such an occurrence today would be highly unlikely because pilots in the skies have better information about the weather.

“We don't fly into bad storms anymore,” Braasch said.

Avoiding disaster

Even though fatal accidents are rare there are still mishaps in the air and on the ground, some of which cause injury. On April 1, 2011 a Southwest Airlines Boeing 737 was forced to make an emergency landing in Arizona after a rupture caused a hole to open in the fuselage at 37,000 feet. Two people on board suffered minor injuries.

Perhaps the most memorable recent non-fatal accident occurred January 15, 2009 when US Airways Flight 1549, an Airbus A320, ingested a flock of geese in its engines on take off from New York's LaGuardia Airport. The plane's captain, Chesley B. "Sully" Sullenberger, glided the jet to a landing on the Hudson River, evacuating the passengers and crew safely. Braasch says the “miracle on the Hudson” does say something about improved aircraft design and pilot training, but also about luck.

“The USAir flight was essentially a situation in which, after the initial geese ingestion, everything went right,” Braasch said. “The skies were completely clear, the Hudson river was not too busy, the plane was close enough to get there, and the pilot was one of USAir's safety trainers, an expert in handling aircraft in hazardous situations.”

International air travel not as safe

Today, most fatal jet airline accidents occur outside the U.S. In 2013, for example, there were 10 additional fatal airline crashes around the world. Braasch says the safety discrepancy is primarily due to lesser quality maintenance and pilot training and not-as-capable air traffic control infrastructure. The safer skies, he says, are made possible by all the lessons learned from previous crashes.

“Every time a pilot made a fatal error, the cause was investigated and the lessons learned were passed on to current and future pilots,” he said.  

One can make the case that commercial air travel has never been a bigger hassle. There are security bottlenecks, crowded planes and fewer direct flights....

Article Image

WK Travel (also known as OneTravel) fined for code-share disclosure violations

WK Travel, also known as OneTravel, is being fined $95,000 for violating the Transportation Department’s (DOT) rules on disclosure of code-share flights.

Code-sharing is the practice of airlines selling seats on flights using their designator codes when the flights are operated by a separate airline.

Shawn of Dallas, Texas, doesn't mince any words when describing his experience with the company.

"Don't get flights with OneTravel; you will get screwed," he writes in a ConsumerAffairs post. "I purchased airfare from OneTravel after several days of search. Finally I saw a flight with Lufthansa to overseas. I jumped on them for $1,465 but my flight had been canceled. They flew me to Madrid with American Air, then Frankfurt and they lost my carry-on. Coming back, they put me on a United flight. It was not Lufthansa and they lost my luggage. I'll never use OneTravel again."

“Consumers deserve to know which airline will be operating their flight as they’re shopping for a ticket,” said U.S. Transportation Secretary Anthony Foxx. “We will continue to make sure that all companies selling air transportation are transparent with consumers and will take enforcement action when necessary.”

Failure to disclose

In the case of WK Travel, DOT’s Aviation Enforcement Office made telephone calls to the call centers of several of the company's websites last January and February inquired about booking certain flights. During these calls, the reservations agents failed to disclose that the flights were being operated under code-share arrangements -- identifying only the name of the airline marketing the flight, but not the name of airline operating the flight, even when prompted by the caller.

This violated DOT rules requiring airlines and ticket agents to inform consumers if a flight is operated under a code-share arrangement, as well as disclose the corporate name of the transporting airline and any other name under which the flight is offered to the public.

In 2013, DOT assessed a record $7.1 million in fines -- predominately for violations of its consumer rights regulations.

WK Travel, also known as OneTravel, is being fined $95,000 for violating the Transportation Department’s (DOT) rules on disclosure of code-share flights. ...

Article Image

Airlines had a very profitable 2013

For an industry that appeared down and out a decade ago, the airline industry has enjoyed a strong comeback, capped with what's expected to be a highly profitable 2013 when the final accounting is done.

For 2013 airlines around the world are expected to return a global net profit of $12.9 billion, rising to $19.7 billion in 2014, according to the International Air Transport Association (IATA). That stands in stark contrast to 2004, when six U.S. airlines filed for bankruptcy protection.

Cutting costs

Airlines have bounced back through consolidation, reducing available seats, lower fuel costs and, for course, a myriad of new fees for things passengers once took for granted. These “ancillary” revenues are a key driver of the industry's improved financial performance, according to the IATA report.

Worldwide, these ancillary revenues have risen to an estimated $13 per passenger, the trade group says. IATA says airlines are underpinning their profitability with innovative products and services. Without these fees, IATA says, the industry would be making a loss from its core seat and cargo products.

“Overall, the industry’s fortunes are moving in the right direction,” said Tony Tyler, IATA’s Director General and CEO. “Jet fuel prices remain high, but below their 2012 peak. Passenger demand is expanding in the five to six percent range, in line with the historical trend. Efficiencies gained through mergers and joint ventures are delivering value to both passengers and shareholders. And product innovations are growing ancillary revenues.”

Since consumers' willingness to pay a fee to check a bag is boosting airlines' profits, what are consumers getting out of the deal? The improvement in system efficiencies that has helped the airlines save money has come at the expense of fewer flights and fuller planes. Direct flights, even between major cities, are fewer than in the past.

Paying for perks

However, consumers willing to pay extra for perks are finding commercial air travel a bit more tolerable. For example, airlines have added priority seating. Want to sit by a window? You can but there's a fee for that.

American Airlines offers a package of boarding perks that allows you to board with the first group, priority stand-by status if you need to take a earlier or later flight and a $75 discount on any change fee. By boarding early you get the early dibs on overhead bin space, which is at a premium these days with so many passengers trying to avoid checked-bag fees. The cost of the package varies depending on the flight.

Continental allows passengers to purchase extra legroom. The fee varies, depending on how long the flight takes and the market. For example, you would pay more for extra legroom on a flight from New York to Los Angeles than you would from St. Louis to Chicago.

JetBlue charges extra for “roomier” seats and Southwest offers an early-bird check-in for $10, placing you in the”A” boarding group. All airlines seem to be moving to allow some of their passengers increased comfort and convenience, for a price.

Lower fares

While consumers may gripe, the published air fares have actually gone down in inflation-adjusted dollars. Today you can fly round trip on JetBlue between New York and Los Angeles for less than $325. If you could have matched that fare in 1977, when airlines were regulated, the airfare in today's inflation-adjusted dollars would have been $1,249. So airlines are selling tickets for less but making it up by charging for things that, in 1977, were free.

Still, with all the fee-generated income, the airline industry said it could encounter new turbulence at any time.

“It’s a tough environment in which to run an airline,” said Tyler. “Competition is intense and yields are deteriorating. Cargo volumes haven’t grown since 2010 and cargo revenues are back at 2007 levels. The passenger business is expanding more robustly. Some airlines will out-perform our estimates and others will under-perform. But, on average, airlines will only make a net profit of about $5.94 per passenger in 2014.”

For an industry that appeared down and out a decade ago, the airline industry has enjoyed a strong comeback, capped with what's expected to be a highly pro...

Article Image

Feds propose rule to allow cell phone data access on planes

Among the instructions to passengers aboard commercial aircraft is the requirement to shutdown mobile electronic devices. Flight attendants are known to be unyielding on this point.

Actor Alec Baldwin has famously been booted off an aircraft after getting into an argument with a flight attendant over his still-powered smartphone. But the in-flight ban on mobile devices may be about to come to an end, much to the consternation of flight attendants. 

The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) is considering a proposal that would permit airlines to install equipment on aircraft that could safely allow passengers to use their smartphones once the aircraft has reached cruising altitude. There is one exception, however. Passengers would still be prohibited from making or receiving phone calls.

Up to individual airlines

The proposal would actually expand the existing default ban on the use of cellphones in-flight to include frequency bands not not included before. However, if an airline chooses to equip its aircraft with specialized onboard equipment that would prevent harmful interference with wireless networks on the ground, the airline would have the ability to enable in-flight wireless broadband access to passengers using their smartphones.

The FCC says the new systems could allow airlines to offer new services to their passengers, including Internet, e-mail, text and potentially voice services. The new technology also would provide airlines with a high level of control over the in-cabin communications environment.

Many passengers may be relieved to learn that the new rules would not allow phone calls – at least not right away. But flight attendants are concerned that if the new rules are adopted as proposed, it's only a matter of time before phone conversations are allowed.

United front

"Flight Attendants and passengers are united on this issue – there should be no voice calls in-flight,”said Veda Shook, Association of Flight Attendants (AFA) International President. “As first responders in the aircraft cabin, Flight Attendants know that this reckless FCC proposal would have negative effects on aviation safety and security.

Shook says the use of cell phones for voice communication poses “unacceptable risks to the security and safety of America's civil aviation system” and must not be permitted.

As currently proposed the rules would only allow passengers to access their data plans on appropriately-equipped aircraft or send and receive texts. But what happens when a passenger using their smartphone to check their email receives a phone call? It will fall to a flight attendant to respond if they take the call and start talking.

'Last line of defense'

“As the last line of defense in our nation's aviation system, Flight Attendants understand the importance of maintaining a calm cabin environment, and passengers agree,” Shook said.

The FCC has prohibited in-flight mobile cellular use since 1991, due to concerns about possible interference to wireless networks on the ground. The FCC now says that the past two decades have produced technology and engineering, as well as specialized onboard systems that can effectively prevent interference with these ground networks on the ground.

The agency notes that foreign airlines have been using onboard mobile access technology over the last five years on flights operating out of Europe and Asia. The FCC said it believes that these systems can be successfully deployed in the U.S.

If the rule is adopted, it doesn't mean all flights will be open to in-flight cellphone use. It would only allow the airlines to install the equipment necessary to offer the data services.

In fact, some airlines already offering in-flight wifi service. However, as of now it can only be accessed using laptop and tablets.

Among the instructions to passengers aboard commercial aircraft is the requirement to shutdown mobile electronic devices. Flight attendants are known to be...

Article Image

American Airlines fined for price advertising rule violation

American Airlines has been slapped with a $60,000 fine for being less than forthcoming with consumers.

The U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) says the carrier violated the federal full-fare advertising rule when its agents told consumers that surcharges levied by the airlines were government-imposed taxes. DOT also ordered the carrier to cease and desist from further violations.

“We expect airlines to be truthful to their customers when they provide information about their fares,” said Transportation Secretary Anthony Foxx. “We will continue to take enforcement action when airlines fail to disclose their fares fully and accurately.”

Full-fare disclosure

Under the DOT's full-fare advertising rule, the first price quoted for air transportation made by an airline or ticket agent must state the entire price to be paid by the consumer -- including all mandatory taxes, fees and airline surcharges. Airlines do not have to break out the components of the fare, but if they do, they must accurately show the costs of the services or taxes.

Following a complaint from a consumer, the Aviation Enforcement Office investigated how American described to potential passengers the taxes and carrier surcharges that it collected. It found that on a number of occasions in 2012 and 2013, American’s telephone reservation agents mistakenly told consumers that a variety of additional taxes and carrier-imposed surcharges were collectively “taxes.”

A significant portion of these charges were not taxes but fees imposed by the airline, such as fuel surcharges. In addition, pop-ups on the airline’s website claimed that these surcharges were taxes and, on at least one occasion, American issued a reservation statement labeling surcharges as taxes.

The carrier has corrected its website and provided additional training to its agents.

American Airlines has been slapped with a $60,000 fine for being less than forthcoming with consumers. The U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) says th...

Article Image

Neglectful parents top the list of annoying airline passengers

Being a frequent flying may have the advantage of racking up airline miles, but there is also a distinct downside. Frequent fliers get to experience the most annoying habits of other travelers.

These days planes fly full. Rarely is there an empty seat beside you. So unless you are in first class, you start off with a feeling of claustrophobia. If the people packed into the seats around you are inconsiderate, without the slightest bit of awareness of how their actions impact their fellow travelers, then even a short hop can be insufferable.

Recently online travel site Expedia.com commissioned a survey of travelers to identify the very worst breaches of airline etiquette. Crying babies didn't make the top of the list but their parents did. 

Child neglect

“Inattentive Parents” came in at number one, with 41% of travelers finding them annoying. A crying baby is one thing but some respondents cited cases of parents ignoring their older children's loud, obnoxious and unruly behavior.

Coming in at number two on the list of annoying airline travelers is the “Rear Seat Kicker.” Rear Seat Kicker is the passenger directly behind you – perhaps with restless leg syndrome – who nervously kicks the back of your seat the entire flight.

“The Aromatic Passenger” comes in third in the survey. Twenty-eight percent said they find the passenger crammed in next to them wearing too much cologne or having gone too long between baths to be highly annoying.

Close behind, with 26% citing it, is “The Boozer,” the passenger who never lets the drink cart pass without ordering another, getting increasingly inebriated throughout the flight. Often it loosens their tongue.

Chatty Cathy

And that leads us the the fifth most-annoying passenger – “Chatty Cathy.” Eighty-five percent of travelers agree that "a little small talk" is acceptable, but ultimately prefer to keep to themselves. Chatty Cathy is oblivious, however.

The complete list, which includes 16 annoying passenger types, will most likely seem very familiar to many frequent fliers. There's “Seat Back Guy,” who insists on reclining his seat as far back in your face as possible the moment the flight attendants allow it.

And no one wants to fly with “Carry On Bag Offender,” who pushes the envelop by loading all their belongings into a duffle bag they try to cram into an overhead bin, all to avoid the cost and hassle of checking a bag. But they don't seem to mind holding up the line as they struggle to get their bags in or out of the overhead bins.

With airlines cutting our food service on most flights it's understandable that a passenger might pack a lunch. But “Pungent Food Eater” thinks up the most aromatic concoction possible to bring out and consume in a tight, enclosed space.

Sounds like trouble

“Audio Insensitive Guy,” who lets his music bleed from his headphones – or worse yet – doesn't even use headphones, was cited by 19% as an annoying passenger. A prediction: “Audio Insensitive Guy's” numbers climb drastically if authorities follow through on plans to allow cellphone use in the air.

With the holiday season bringing packed planes and crowded airports, John Morrey, vice president and general manager, Expedia.com, says travelers should be aware of airline etiquette, including their own.

"Most of us, when we look at the list of offending behaviors, can admit to having committed one or more of the violations,” Morrey said. “So this season, perhaps we can all take care to be as friendly and accommodating to our fellow passengers as possible. After all, we're quite literally all in this together."

Avoiding airport hell

Annoying fellow passengers not withstanding, there are a few things travelers can do to make the flying experience less painful. Businessweek recently laid out its top ten suggestions, a few of which might not have occurred to you.

For example, always enter the airport near the premier/first class checkin. Even though you are flying coach, the elite entrance is usually quieter and less crowded.

If you need help from an airline rep, approach one in the airline's lounge, if you have access, rather than at the ticket counter. Lounge attendants are less stressed and more likely to do everything possible to help you.

Check out the complete list here.

Being a frequent flying may have the advantage of racking up airline miles, but there is also a distinct downside. Frequent fliers get to experience the mo...

Article Image

It's official: American, US Airways have completed their merger

With air travel bollixed by rotten weather across much of the country, it's a bad day for flying, but it's a good day for creating the world's largest airline. American Airlines Group Inc. was officially born this morning as American completed its merger with US Airways.

The new carrier immediately became the world's largest airline by traffic.

"Our people, our customers and the communities we serve around the world have been anticipating the arrival of the new American," said Doug Parker, CEO of American Airlines, in a prepared statement.  "We are taking the best of both US Airways and American Airlines to create a formidable competitor, better positioned to deliver for all of our stakeholders.  We look forward to integrating our companies quickly and efficiently so the significant benefits of the merger can be realized."

The new American has a global network with nearly 6,700 daily flights to more than 330 destinations in more than 50 countries and more than 100,000 employees worldwide. 

It has 600 new jetliners on order, to freshen up its aged fleet and improve the company's fuel economy. 

Parker, who was previously CEO of US Airways, said the combined airline has the scale, breadth and capabilities to compete more effectively and profitably in the global marketplace and said customers will soon enjoy access to more benefits and increased service across the combined company's larger worldwide network and through an enhanced oneworld Alliance. US Airways will exit Star Alliance on March 30, 2014 and will immediately enter oneworld on March 31, 2014.

The hoopla and hype is in marked contrast to the gloom and doom that surrounded American for the last few years, as it watched from bankruptcy as other airlines bulked up. The American-US Airways merger notion began to take hold in September 2012. It encountered resistance from federal and state regulators but a series of concessions finally cleared the way and the merger got its final clearance last week as courts declined to intervene further.

Business as usual

Consumers rate American Airlines
It's expected to take about two years to completely merger the operations, including winning FAA approval of the new carrier's Operating Certificate.

In the meantime, American said, customers should continue to do business with the airline from which travel was purchased just as they did before the merger.  In short, it is "business as usual."  The airlines' separate websites, aa.com and usairways.com, as well as the two airlines' reservations systems and loyalty programs, will continue to operate separately until further in the integration process.

With air travel bollixed by rotten weather across much of the country, it's a bad day for flying, but it's a good day for creating the world's largest airl...

Article Image

Brazilian airline fined for violating consumer rules

Brazilian airline GOL will pay a fine of $250,000 for violating a number of Department of Transportation (DOT) rules protecting the rights of air travelers. It’s the largest penalty assessed for violations of the rules adopted in April 2011.

DOT has ordered the airline to cease and desist from further violations of its airline consumer rules.

“We adopted these rules to ensure that passengers are treated with respect when they buy a ticket or board a plane,” said Transportation Secretary Anthony Foxx. “We will not tolerate disregard of our rules and will take enforcement action when necessary to protect travelers.”

Lack of information

DOT’s Aviation Enforcement Office found that GOL’s U.S. website -- for a period of time after it was launched in November 2012 -- failed to include a variety of information and features required by DOT air travel consumer protection rules.

The website did not include a contingency plan for handling lengthy tarmac delays or a link from the homepage to a list of fees for baggage and other optional services.

Excruciating searches

GOL also violated the full-fare advertising requirement by failing to include taxes and fees in fares displayed on the website in response to consumer searches. The full fare, including taxes and fees, was available only after the consumer selected a specific itinerary.

The airline also failed to post its contract of carriage in an easily accessible form on its website. A consumer had to begin the process of searching for an itinerary before being able to gain access to the contract information.

This made it hard to easily compare GOL’s contract with those of other airlines, and made obtaining the contract difficult for passengers who wanted to review the information online before booking a flight by telephone or with a ticket agent.

GOL also failed to include on its website required information on how consumers can file a complaint with the airline.

Brazilian airline GOL will pay a fine of $250,000 for violating a number of Department of Transportation (DOT) rules protecting the rights of air travelers...

Article Image

Holiday air fares head sky-high

Planning on doing some holiday travel? Better be prepared to pay premium prices.

Based on holiday travel tickets booked by travelers on Priceline.com, the average Thanksgiving airfare is now hovering around $407, while the average Christmas airfare is about $450.

Booking your flight

If you were hoping to fly cheaper for the Thanksgiving holiday, you're a little late. The least costly day to fly is today -- November 21 -- with the average airfare at a wallet-friendly $336. Other affordable days are tomorrow (November 22), November 28 (Thanksgiving Day) and 29. The most expensive day to fly is December 1, when the average domestic fare is around $490. Other expensive travel days are November 27 and December 2.

For Christmas, consider flying on Dec. 23, 24, New Year’s Eve and New Year’s Day, when average fares can be as low as $397. Travelers will pay the most -- as much as $500 -- to fly on Dec. 21 and January 4.

What to do

  • Look for early morning or late evening flights -- the ones that holiday travelers typically don’t take. They tend to be cheaper.
  • Try different departure and return days. An extra day here and there can lower the fare. Staying over a weekend can drop the fare as well.
  • Smartphone or tablet owners can download travel apps. Having one or more travel apps is a big stress reliever, since you have the ability to book last-minute hotel rooms and rental cars, and check on flights and weather conditions.
  • Read up on the baggage restrictions of your airline and don’t overpack. Fees for extra or overweight bags can run as high as $100 each. In 2012, media reports showed that the 15 major airlines pulled in $3.5 billion in baggage fees.
  • Send presents on ahead. UPS shipping costs are a bargain compared to those extra baggage fees – and, those presents ARE extra baggage.
  • Be sure that the name you give for your ticket matches the ID you’ll use at the airport. That way, you won’t be hit with a ticket change fee.
  • Always check your flights before heading to the airport, just in case of changes.

Planning on doing some holiday travel? Better be prepared to pay premium prices. Based on holiday travel tickets booked by travelers on priceline.com, t...

Article Image

Southwest Airlines joins TSA's "Pre-Check"

Southwest Airlines is officially joining the Transportation Security Administration's "Pre-Check" program, joining American, Delta, United, US Airways and Hawaiian Airlines, effective today.

The program is also being extended to all U.S. Armed Forces service members, including those serving in the U.S. Coast Guard, Reserves and National Guard. As a result of the agreement, these individuals will be able to enjoy the benefits of the program at the 100 participating airports across the country, beginning Dec. 20.

The program allows pre-screened travelers to go through special security lanes at airports around the country. It's intended to make life a little easier for frequent flyers and business travelers, who must go through an initial security check and pay $100. 

Travelers cleared into the program are generally not required to remove belts, outerwear and shoes or to take liquids out of suitcases when passing through TSA security checkpoints at airports, although they remain subject to random checks. 

Participants get a "Known Traveler Number" which they must enter when making their travel reservations. The numbers are also issued to United States citizens who become members of several U.S. Customs and Border Protection trusted traveler programs, including Global Entry, Nexus and Sentri. Elite members of airlines' frequent traveler programs also may use "Pre-Check," according to a TSA spokeswoman.

Roger Dow, president and CEO of the U.S. Travel Association, said the addition of Southwest is good news for travelers.

The recent trend in federal aviation policy has been decidedly pro-traveler, and the more people travel, the better it is for U.S. economic and job growth. Pre-Check is a prime example of the innovative policies — Global Entry, Visa Waiver and Automated Passport Control are others — that are making travel easier for the public while still maintaining the optimum security standards that always need to be our top priority."

Southwest Airlines is officially joining the Transportation Security Administration's "Pre-Check" program, joining American, Delta, United, US Airways and...

Article Image

Getting to know you: Airlines mining their customer data more aggressively

"Good afternoon, Mr. Hood," said a Lufthansa flight attendant as she bent down over my coach-class seat on a recent trip across the pond.

I was shocked. The last time a flight attendant called me by name was when United threw me off a flight in Denver because the gate agent had given my seat to someone else.

While Lufthansa may be a step ahead in the customer service department, other airlines are closing fast. Soon, the Wall Street Journal reports, flight attendants will know our birthdays, how we like our coffee and whether we're likely to buy anything on board.

Not to mention whether we're likely to drink too much and cause trouble. In that case, maybe we'll get the treatment I received in Denver. (I was sober as the proverbial judge, by the way). 

After all, the airlines already have a lot of this information lurking in their databases. And thanks to such Big Data troves as Experian, it won't be long before they can fill in any blanks that remain.

This could mean that as the flight attendant wanders down the aisle with a tablet computer, he'll have a good idea of what we're likely to want and, perhaps, whether we'll be in a pleasant mood or whether we're the type who writes to ConsumerAffairs after each flight to complain about something.

More significantly, the tablet may have information on our food allergies, medical conditions and disabilities, which could actually be a good thing.

Gut reaction

Unlike some industries, the airlines have been slow to actually put all of this into practice. American Airlines, for example, has until recently had a "gut reaction" that it should protect its customers' privacy.

But now, Maya Leibman, chief technology and information officer for AA, says the carrier is learning to walk the line "between providing excellent customer service and suddenly becoming creepy," the Journal reports.

Allegiant seems to be the carrier that has most enthusiastically embraced all this data. That's at least partly because it's really more of a flying salesroom than transportation company. During its flights to and from Las Vegas, flight attendants pitch everything imaginable, including show tickets and tours. This reliance on in-cabin sales gives it a real incentive to keep track of the big spenders on board.

Do you think the airlines will soon know which passengers are likely to have crying babies with them? 

"Good afternoon, Mr. Hood," said a Lufthansa flight attendant as she bent down over my coach-class seat on a recent trip across the pond.I was shocked. T...

Article Image

Flying to get easier for passengers with disabilities

Airline passengers with disabilities may soon find that flying is less of a hassle.

As part of what it terms an “ongoing effort to ensure equal access to air transportation for all travelers,” the the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) is requiring airline websites and automated airport kiosks to be accessible to passengers with disabilities.

Additionally, DOT will let airlines choose between stowing wheelchairs in a cabin compartment on new aircraft or strapping them to a row of seats -- an option that will ensure that two manual, folding wheelchairs can be transported at a time.

“All air travelers should be treated fairly when they fly, regardless of any disabilities they may have,” said Transportation Secretary Anthony Foxx. “These new rules build on our past work in ensuring that our air transportation system is accessible for everyone, while balancing both airlines’ and passengers’ need for flexibility.”

Deadlines set for improvements

Under the new websites-and-kiosks rule, covered airlines are required within two years to make pages of their websites that contain core travel information and services accessible to persons with disabilities, and to make all of their web pages accessible within three years. Websites are required to meet the standards for accessibility contained in the widely accepted Website Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG).

The requirement applies to U.S. and foreign airlines with websites marketing air transportation to U.S. consumers for travel within, to or from the United States.

The rule also requires ticket agents to disclose and offer web-based discount fares to customers unable to use their sites due to a disability starting within 180 days after the rule’s effective date. Airlines are already required to provide equivalent service for consumers who are unable to use inaccessible websites. Under the new rule, airlines must also offer equivalent service to passengers with disabilities who are unable to use their websites even if the websites meet the WCAG accessibility standards.

Kiosk accessibility

In addition, any automated kiosks installed at U.S. airports for services -- such as printing boarding passes and baggage tags -- must be accessible to passengers with disabilities until at least 25% of all kiosks at each airport location are accessible. Even if no new kiosks are installed, 25% of kiosks at each airport location must be accessible within 10 years.

The standards for accessible kiosks are based on those set by the U.S. Department of Justice for ATMs and fare machines in its 2010 Americans with Disabilities Act rule as well as the Section 508 standards for self-contained closed products, such as copiers.

Stowing wheelchairs

DOT’s wheelchair rule provides airlines with more flexibility because it permits airlines to transport passenger wheelchairs by strapping them across a row of seats using a strap kit that complies with applicable safety standards, in addition to stowing them in a closet or similar compartment.

In 2008, DOT issued a rule prohibiting airlines from using the seat-strapping method on new aircraft as an alternative to stowing the manual wheelchair in a closet or similar compartment. In that same rule, DOT allowed the use of a seat-strapping method on existing aircraft. Based on a fuller evaluation of the costs and benefits, DOT has now revised its position to also allow the use of seat-strapping on new aircraft subject to certain conditions.

For example, if an airline chooses to use the seat-strapping method to stow a wheelchair, it must transport two wheelchairs in the cabin if requested unless stowing the second wheelchair would displace other passengers.

If an airline chooses to use a closet to stow a wheelchair, then it will still be required to stow only one wheelchair in the cabin. However, in this case it must install a sign or placard prominently on the closet indicating that a wheelchair and other assistive devices are to be stowed in this area with priority over other items brought onto the aircraft by other passengers or crew, including crew luggage.     

Airline passengers with disabilities may soon find that flying is less of a hassle. As part of what it terms an “ongoing effort to ensure equal access to ...

Article Image

US Airways fined in disability case

For failing to provide adequate wheelchair assistance to passengers in Philadelphia and Charlotte, N.C., US Airways is being fined $1.2 million – one of the largest fines ever assessed by the Department of Transportation (DOT) in a disability case.

“All air travelers deserve to be treated equally and with respect, and this includes persons in wheelchairs and other passengers with disabilities,” said Transportation Secretary Anthony Foxx. “We will continue to make sure that airlines comply with our rules and treat their passengers fairly.”

Under DOT’s rules implementing the Air Carrier Access Act, airlines are required to provide free, prompt wheelchair assistance upon request to passengers with disabilities. This includes helping passengers to move between gates and make connections to other flights.

Numerous violations

DOT's Aviation Enforcement Office found that US Airways committed a significant number of violations of the requirements for wheelchair assistance during 2011 and 2012 at Philadelphia International Airport and Charlotte Douglas International Airport. As part of one of its periodic reviews, the Enforcement Office examined approximately 300 complaints filed by passengers with the airline and DOT relating to incidents at Philadelphia and Charlotte, which covered only a sample of complaints filed over two years against US Airways for the two airports.

The airline’s use of a combination of electric carts and wheelchairs to carry passengers between gates required frequent transfers and led to long delays. Some passengers missed connections because of the delays or were left unattended for long periods of time.

Service improvements

Of the $1.2 million fine, US Airways may use up to $500,000 for improvements in its service to passengers with disabilities that are beyond what DOT rules require.

These include hiring managers to ensure the quality of the airline’s disability services in Philadelphia and Charlotte, creating a telephone line to assist these passengers, purchasing tablets and other equipment to monitor assistance requests, providing compensation to passengers with disability-related complaints, and programming the airline’s computers so that boarding passes identify passengers who request special services.  

For failing to provide adequate wheelchair assistance to passengers in Philadelphia and Charlotte, N.C., US Airways is being fined $1.2 million – one of t...

Article Image

FAA clears electronic devices for take-off

The days of starting blankly into space during airline take-offs and landings are just about over. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Administrator Michael Huerta today announced that the FAA has determined that airlines can safely expand passenger use of portable electronic devices during all phases of flight, and is immediately providing the airlines with guidance on implementing the new rules. 

Because of differences among aircraft and operating policies, rules will vary among airlines but the FAA says it expects that most carriers will be able to allow passengers to safely use their devices in airplane mode, gate-to-gate, by the end of the year.

The FAA based its decision on input from a group of experts that included representatives from the airlines, aviation manufacturers, passengers, pilots, flight attendants, and the mobile technology industry.

“We believe today’s decision honors both our commitment to safety and consumer’s increasing desire to use their electronic devices during all phases of their flights,” said Transportation Secretary Anthony Foxx. “These guidelines reflect input from passengers, pilots, manufacturers, and flight attendants, and I look forward to seeing airlines implement these much anticipated guidelines in the near future.”     

Passengers will eventually be able to read e-books, play games, and watch videos on their devices during all phases of flight, with very limited exceptions. Electronic items, books and magazines, must be held or put in the seat back pocket during the actual takeoff and landing roll.

Cell phones should be in airplane mode or with cellular service disabled – i.e., no signal bars displayed—and cannot be used for voice communications based on FCC regulations that prohibit any airborne calls using cell phones.    If your air carrier provides Wi-Fi service during flight, you may use those services.  You can also continue to use short-range Bluetooth accessories, like wireless keyboards.

Industry reaction

U.S. Travel Association President and CEO Roger Dow welcomed the announcement.

“We’re pleased the FAA recognizes that an enjoyable passenger experience is not incompatible with safety and security,” Dow said. “The Obama administration deserves credit for common-sense, ‘win-win’ policies like this, as well as the implementation of Automated Passport Control and the expansion of programs such as Visa Waiver and Pre-Check.

“The travel community is grateful, because what’s good for the traveler is good for travel-related businesses and our economy. It’s this kind of forward thinking that will enable us to remain among the leading industries in growth and job creation.”

Tolerate interference

The FAA's committee concluded that most commercial airplanes can tolerate radio interference signals from the devices. Once an airline verifies the tolerance of its fleet, it can allow passengers to use handheld, lightweight electronic devices – such as tablets, e-readers, and smartphones—at all altitudes.

In rare instances of low-visibility, the crew will instruct passengers to turn off their devices during landing. The group also recommended that heavier devices should be safely stowed under seats or in overhead bins during takeoff and landing.

The FAA said it did not consider changing the regulations regarding the use of cell phones for voice communications during flight because the issue is under the jurisdiction of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC). 

The days of starting blankly into space during airline take-offs and landings are just about over. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Administrator...

Article Image

That's entertainment: Virgin America turns safety instructions into song and dance

Air travelers know that flying is no picnic. Besides the fees for everything under the sun, there's the hassle of passing through security and getting on the airplane.

But once on board, Virgin America is greeting passengers with a little entertainment. A lot, actually. The air safety instructions, delivered in mind-numbing monotone by most flight attendants who might recite them dozens of times each week, have been replaced on Virgin America by a domestic safety video set entirely to music and performed in dance.

Entitled “#VX Safety Dance,” the video is a music and dance extravaganza that may blow passengers back in their seats – in an upright and locked position, of course.

Going airborne in November

The video goes airborne in the U.S. in November. This isn't the first time the airline has gotten cute with video instructions. In 2007 it produced an animated video to remind passengers of government safety rules.

For the new incarnation Virgin America tapped film director Jon M. Chu and singers, dancers and choreographers from TV's "American Idol" and "So You Think You Can Dance." To get maximum impact, the airline is inviting the flying public to compete for a chance to be cast in a future version of #VX Safety Dance by submitting their own video versions.

"We knew how much our guests loved the fun and irreverence of our current video, but after six years we wanted to give them something unexpected – a fresh take on what a safety video could be and even a chance to be a part of it, literally" said Jesse McMillin, Creative Director at Virgin America. "We thought, what better way to shake things up than to re-imagine the safety video through the language of music and dance?”

To celebrate its new video – and how many airlines celebrate a new version of their safety instructions? – Virgin America is launching a one-day sale on fares for travel between Nov. 4 and Dec. 17.

Air travelers know that flying is no picnic. Besides the fees for everything under the sun, there's the hassle of passing through security and getting on t...

Article Image

United fined for lengthy O’Hare tarmac delays

United Airlines is being fined $1.1 million for lengthy tarmac delays that took place at Chicago-O’Hare International Airport on July 13, 2012.

This is the largest fine assessed by the U. S. Department of Transportation (DOT) for a tarmac-delay violation since the rule limiting long tarmac delays first took effect in April 2010. United will pay $475,000 of that to the U.S. government, with the rest covering mitigation measures for affected passengers and significant corrective actions by United to enhance future compliance with tarmac delay requirements.

“It is unacceptable for passengers to be stranded in planes on the tarmac for hours on end,” said Transportation Secretary Anthony Foxx. “We will continue to require airlines to adopt workable plans to protect passengers from lengthy tarmac delays and carry out these plans when necessary.”

Weather a factor

United is being fined for 13 lengthy tarmac delays that took place on a day when severe thunderstorms and lightning caused several ramp closures and disrupted the movement of aircraft at O’Hare. Delays by United and its United Express code-share affiliates exceeded the three-hour limit for tarmac delays by as little as two minutes and as much as 77 minutes.

Although United had a contingency plan for tarmac delays, DOT’s Aviation Enforcement Office found that the airline did not implement the plan during these delays, and that the plan was inadequate to cover foreseeable weather emergencies in which there were more planes on the ground than space at gates.

The Enforcement Office also found that United did not contact airport personnel or other airlines for assistance during the tarmac delays. Additionally, on two United Express flights, the lavatories were inoperable during part of the delays.

Time limits

Under DOT rules, U.S. airlines operating aircraft with 30 or more passenger seats are prohibited from allowing their domestic flights to remain on the tarmac for more than three hours at U.S. airports without giving passengers an opportunity to leave the plane. Exceptions to the time limits are allowed only for safety, security or air traffic control-related reasons.

The rules also require airlines to provide adequate food and water, ensure that lavatories are working and, if necessary, provide medical attention to passengers during long tarmac delays.

United Airlines is being fined $1.1 million for lengthy tarmac delays that took place at Chicago-O’Hare International Airport on July 13, 2012. This is ...

Article Image

600 Spirit Airline passengers stranded in Fort Lauderdale

Caveat emptor: let the buyer beware. That’s important for everyone to bear in mind whenever they sign a contract or make a purchase, and it’s double-especially important for airline passengers seeking to fly in American airspace, because once the airline gets your money, you not only lose many of your rights as a consumer, but even certain rights guaranteed by the Constitution.

Consider the ordeal suffered by certain Spirit Airlines passengers in Fort Lauderdale, Florida, on Oct. 24: over 600 passengers stranded in the Fort Lauderdale-Hollywood airport for several hours after Spirit grounded ten flights out of the airport.

Spirit released a statement saying “Following the engine failure on one of our aircraft last week, and after reviewing routine maintenance procedures, we are completing a proactive and voluntary check on our aircraft engines overnight as a precautionary measure... We apologize for these delays. We are working diligently to get our customers where they need to go as quickly as possible. As always, the safety of our customers is our number one priority.”

On the other hand, CBS News spoke to an unnamed officer from the Broward County Sheriff’s Department who suggested that the lengthy delay was mainly due to Spirit’s lacking enough mechanics on staff. (Why were they speaking to a sheriff? Because conditions among passengers stranded in the airport got bad enough that the cops were called out.)

But even if you grant Spirit the benefit of the doubt, and assume that the legnthy delay was somehow unavoidable, many passengers complained not so much about the delay itself, but how they were treated throughout it: stranded in Fort Lauderdale with nowhere to sleep except the airport waiting area, and they weren’t even allowed access to their luggage, which had already been checked and was locked up somewhere.

Grounded passenger Lauren Digangi told WSVN-TV that she tried leaving Fort Lauderdale on a different flight, but said, “They will not give me my baggage off my plane to go to a different airline. They won't fly my baggage to Newark, or anything like that. They will not refund my money. All they did was give me a $7 voucher and told me to wait until then and that time is tentative and scheduled to change."

Another grounded flier, Heather Hart, told WSVN that passengers who tried complaining to Spirit’s customer service hotline were told they would be charged for the privilege. “You know you call and follow the prompts and it says, 'To speak to a customer service representative, just know that Spirit will charge you for this phone call’," she said.

No protection

Consumers rate Spirit Air

Unfortunately, there really isn’t any law requiring Spirit or any other airline to return luggage to stranded passengers. (Indeed, not until 2011were airlines even required to reimburse people for lost baggage or bumped flights; before then, an airline was perfectly within its rights to charge you a fee for checked baggage, lose said baggage—and keep the baggage fee.)

In 2009, new legislation required airplanes delayed on a tarmac to let passengers off the plane after three hours, and also said that passengers trapped on such planes must have access to working lavatories and clean drinking water. Remember: these rules were considered signficant improvements over what passengers were legally obligated to endure before that.

Offhand, we can’t think of any other American industry whose companies have the legal right to confine their customers in enclosed spaces without access to drinking water or bathroom facilities for any length of time, which is why we said caveat emptor for any airline passengers.

Numerous complaints

But even when Spirit Airlines flights run according to schedule, many of our readers have complained about the airline’s service. In addition to numerous complaints from people claiming they weren’t told about high baggage fees until the last minute, we also heard from Michael S. of Seabrook, New Hampshire, who wrote us on Oct. 18 after he paid extra for one type of seat and Spirit assigned him another: “I booked a flight in Feb. … and paid extra for extra leg room, since I am 6'6" tall. When I booked a seat on the plane they showed me, my plane had two exit doors. When I got on the plane this past weekend, I had the correct seat but Spirit changed the plane. … They will tell you if they change the flight time but NOT the plane. Why would I have paid extra to sit in a small space? …. This is the second time they have changed the plane on me, and I have always paid for the extra leg room….”

On Oct. 13, Steve D. of Long Beach, Calif. told us he missed a Spirit flight because the company didn’t have a ticket agent available: “There was no ground staff when we arrived an hour and ten minutes before our flight. We just needed boarding passes. … They never showed until 30 minutes prior to flight and said we needed to get on the flight the next day for an additional $250. This happened to another 6 passengers while we were there! It's just another way for them to try and get more $ from passengers! Always bring boarding passes to the airport or, better yet, never fly Spirit!”

Organized opposition

Spirit Airlines has even inspired its own anti-fan website, which we learned about on Oct. 13 after Sergey G. of Fort Lee, New Jersey wrote us to say “Spirit is absolutely the worst! Got overcharged and ignored by their customer service. Their continued existence is a mockery of decent business practices and corporate social responsibility. It's time we do something about it!”

Al L. of Pawneys Island, South Carolina, used to fly Spirit Airlines on a regular basis—but not anymore. When he wrote us on Oct. 7, he said, “I have been flying Spirit for years and have a carry-on bag that I have used each time I fly with Spirit. The dimensions are 21 x 14 x 9 which is less than the dimensions on their website. You are allowed to take one carry-on without charge.”

Sounds good so far. So what’s the problem? “Today, the boarding rep threatened to prevent me from taking my flight unless I paid a $100 fee for the carry-on. No one else was charged, [even if they] brought on bags that were a little larger than mine. I have never been charged before but this Spirit employee was rude, arrogant and downright nasty. It seems that on a simple whim a Spirit can choose to charge you or threaten to stop you from boarding if they choose to.”

That’s true. But it’s not just Spirit; for pretty much any airline, if they decide at the last minute that you can not board unless you do X, Y or Z, well—you can’t board unless you do X, Y or Z, and if you try doing so anyway you’ll almost certainly be arrested as a threat to airline security.

Caveat emptor: let the buyer beware. That’s important for everyone to bear in mind whenever they sign a contract or make a purchase, and it’s d...

Article Image

Airline on-time performance shows improvement in August

The on-time performance of the nation’s largest airlines improved in August from a month earlier, but dropped a bit from the same time a year earlier.

According to the U.S. Department of Transportation’s Air Travel Consumer Report, the August on-time rate was 78.8% -- up 5.7% from July, but down 0.3% from August 0f 2012.

During the same month, there were also two tarmac delays of more than three hours on domestic flights. Both involved flights scheduled to arrive in Denver, Colo., on Aug. 3 that were diverted due to storms. There were no reports of delays exceeding four hours for international flights.

The report also includes data on cancellations, chronically delayed flights, and the causes of flight delays, along with information on mishandled baggage reports filed by consumers with the carriers, and consumer service, disability, and discrimination complaints received. Also included are reports of incidents involving the loss, death, or injury of pets traveling by air.

The full report is available on the Department of Transportation website.

The nation’s largest airlines improved in August from a month earlier, but dropped a bit from the same time a year earlier. According to the U.S. Departme...

Article Image

Study: Airlines profit at consumer expense

Who would be in favor of rising airline cancellation fees, unaffordable refundable tickets and misleading travel insurance marketing?

The airlines, that's who, according to the National Consumers League (NCL). A new report from the consumer group says those have become major players in the airline industry’s growing drive to profit from life’s unpredictable events. Findings suggest that the airlines are supplementing cancellation/change fees revenue with commissions from the sale of travel insurance policies that are often misleadingly marketed to consumers.

“The fact is, stuff happens and consumers may need to change or cancel a flight,” said NCL Executive Director Sally Greenberg. “We think it’s a bad business practice for airlines to rely on life’s unpredictability -- a child’s broken arm, a parent needing to be taken to the hospital, a canceled conference -- to bring in billions of dollars in revenue. What’s worse, consumers who want to hedge against the risk of expensive change fees by buying travel insurance often find that they aren’t covered when the unexpected happens.”

Louis of Houston, Texas, knows what its like to be jammed up by an emergency. When he and his partner were on vacation in Santa Fe, New Mexico, they learned from their babysitter that their daughter had a seizure had been taken to the hospital. “I called reservation service (for United Airlines) and was told we would need to pay a $200 fee per ticket to change the return date and pay $400 each for a new ticket,” he writes in a ConsumerAffairs post. However, he found a way around it. After getting no help from the agent, he writes, “I hung up and immediately called back and purchased two new tickets for $400 each. By doing so I saved the $200 change fee.”

The high cost of flying

According to the report, entitled "$tuff Happens: Airlines Benefit Handsomely From the Unexpected … and Consumers’ Fears About It:"

  • Cancellation/change fees now account for more than $2.5 billion in airline revenue, an increase of more than 176% since 2007;
  • Annual sales of travel insurance and related services increased by approximately 46% from 2006-2012 to $1.9 billion;
  • Trip cancellation/interruption policies -- the type most often marketed to consumers by airline websites and online travel agencies -- accounted for 94% of travel insurance premiums in 2012, an increase of more than 22% since 2006;
  • Refundable tickets are not an affordable alternative for most consumers. On average, the least-expensive refundable ticket is 350% more expensive that the least-expensive non-refundable ticket (which make up more than 80% of all tickets sold).

Misleading marketing

Consumers rate United Airlines
As a hedge against rising cancellation/change fees and prohibitively expensive refundable tickets, it is logical for consumers to look to travel insurance. Unfortunately, travel insurance policies are misleadingly marketed by online travel agencies and airline websites. Terms like “worry-free” and “peace of mind is only a click away,” encourage consumers to purchase add-on travel insurance policies during the ticket-buying process without learning about the significant limitations and exclusions hidden in the fine print of these policies.

“In comparison to a potential $200 cancellation fee, 5% of the cost of the ticket for travel insurance may seem like a great deal to many consumers,” said report author John Breyault, NCL vice president of Public Policy, Telecommunications and Fraud. “All too often, however, consumers find that the protection they thought they had is denied due to pre-existing condition exclusions and other fine print.”

To address the linked issues of rising cancellation/change fees, unaffordable refundable tickets and misleadingly marketed travel insurance, NCL is recommending that there be no cancellation/change fees for changes made more than 5-10 days prior to a trip, that consumers be allowed to transfer their tickets to another traveler without a fee and that standby fees be eliminated, among other reforms.

Who would be in favor of rising airline cancellation fees, unaffordable refundable tickets and misleading travel insurance marketing? The airlines, that's...

Article Image

Travelers plagued by tarmac delays in July

Anyone flying in or out of New York’s LaGuardia Airport on July 22 had a tough time of it.

Twelve of the 13 tarmac delays of more than three hours on domestic flights reported during July occurred at LaGuardia. The front landing gear of a Southwest Airlines plane collapsed upon landing at the airport, causing it to be closed temporarily.

In addition to the 13 domestic delays, there were three tarmac delays of more than four hours on international flights in July.

The U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) is investigating all the delays.

The 16 airlines that file their on-time performance data with DOT reported that 73.1% of their flights arrived on time in July, down nearly 3% from the previous year, but an improvement up the June 2013 mark of 71.9%.

The report also includes data on cancellations, chronically delayed flights, and the causes of flight delays, along with information on mishandled baggage reports filed by consumers with the carriers, and consumer service, disability, and discrimination complaints received. Also included are reports of incidents involving the loss, death, or injury of pets traveling by air.

The full report is available on the Department of Transportation website.

Anyone flying in or out of New York’s LaGuardia Airport on July 22 had a tough time of it. Twelve of the 13 tarmac delays of more than three hours on dome...

Article Image

Virgin America fined for safety violation

The failure to make its in-flight safety video accessible to passengers with hearing impairments will cost Virgin America $150,000. In announcing the fine, the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) also ordered the carrier to cease and desist from further violations.

“Safety is our number-one priority and that includes ensuring that every airline passenger has access to airline safety briefings,” said Transportation Secretary Anthony Foxx. “We will continue to take enforcement action when our disability rules are violated so that all passengers are aware of critical, potentially life-saving information.”

DOT’s Aviation Enforcement Office investigators found that since October 2007, when the airline first began scheduled service, Virgin America used its in-flight entertainment system to present the pre-flight safety briefing but failed to ensure that the video was accompanied either by open captioning or an inset for a sign language interpreter. This violated DOT’s rule, which is part of its regulations implementing the Air Carrier Access Act, requiring video safety briefings to be accessible to passengers with hearing impairments.

Although captioning for in-flight safety videos created before Nov. 10, 2009, is not required to be in high contrast, Virgin America has agreed to add high-contrast captioning to its video by Sept. 30, 2013.

The failure to make its in-flight safety video accessible to passengers with hearing impairments will cost Virgin America $150,000. In announcing the fine,...

Article Image

United fined for refund violations

The Transportation Department (DOT) has hit United Airlines with a $350,000 fine for failing to make prompt refunds to consumers. The carrier was also cited for filing inaccurate reports of its mishandled baggage and oversales, and failing to file timely reports of incidents involving animals in flight.

United was not fined for the latter violations because it disclosed the reporting errors to DOT and took corrective action.

“When passengers are owed a refund, they have the right to expect the airline to act promptly and give them their money back,” said U.S. Transportation Secretary Anthony Foxx. “We also expect airlines to file accurate and timely consumer reports so that passengers will have the information they need when choosing an airline.”

Missed refund deadlines

Airlines are required to process refund requests within seven days of receipt of a complete request when the ticket is purchased by credit card. Refunds must be made within 20 days for tickets purchased by cash or check. United’s customer service commitment, posted on its website, pledged to comply with these standards.

However, DOT’s Aviation Enforcement Office, during an on-site inspection at the airline’s headquarters, found that between March and May of 2012, United failed to process over 9,000 refund requests in a timely manner.

In addition, the airline underreported the number of mishandled baggage reports it received from passengers between January and October 2011, and the number of passengers it bumped, both voluntarily and involuntarily, for each quarter of 2011 from flights on which it sold more tickets than the number of available seats.

The underreporting made United’s ranking in these categories seem better than it actually was. Also, during 2012 and 2013, United failed to file timely reports for a few incidents involving the death, injury or loss of animals on its flights.

The Transportation Department (DOT) has hit United Airlines with a $350,000 fine for failing to make prompt refunds to consumers. The carrier was also cite...

Article Image

Just three tarmac delays in June: two domestic and one international

It was 2-1 for the domestic flights in terms of unacceptable tarmac delays in June.

In other words, airlines reported two tarmac delays of more than three hours on domestic flights and one tarmac delay of more than four hours on an international flight, according to the Transportation Department's (DOT) Air Travel Consumer Report.

In May, carriers reported 5 such tarmac delays for domestic flights, but none for international flights.

The 16 carriers that file their on-time performance data with DOT reported that 71.9% of their flights arrived on time in June, compared with the 80.7% on-time rate from June 2012 and the 79.4% mark from May 2013.

The report also includes data on cancellations, chronically delayed flights, and the causes of flight delays, along with information on airline bumping, mishandled baggage reports filed by consumers with the carriers, and consumer service, disability, and discrimination complaints. Reports of incidents involving the loss, death, or injury of pets traveling by air, are also covered.

The complete report is available om the DOT website.

It was 2-1 for the domestic flights in terms of unacceptable tarmac delays in June. In other words, airlines reported two tarmac delays of more than three...

Article Image

Feds, states challenge American-US Airways merger

The U.S. Justice Department, six state attorneys general and the District of Columbia filed suit today challenging the proposed $11 billion merger between US Airways Group Inc. and American Airlines’ parent corporation, AMR Corp. 

The suit alleges that the merger, which would result in the creation of the world’s largest airline, would substantially lessen competition for commercial air travel in local markets throughout the United States and result in passengers paying higher airfares and receiving less service. 

The participating attorneys general are:   Texas, where American Airlines is headquartered; Arizona, where US Airways is headquartered; Florida; the District of Columbia; Pennsylvania; Tennessee; and Virginia.

“Airline travel is vital to millions of American consumers who fly regularly for either business or pleasure,” said Attorney General Eric Holder.   “By challenging this merger, the Department of Justice is saying that the American people deserve better.   This transaction would result in consumers paying the price – in higher airfares, higher fees and fewer choices.   Today’s action proves our determination to fight for the best interests of consumers by ensuring robust competition in the marketplace.”

Acting in tandem

In recent years, major airlines have, in tandem, raised fares, imposed new and higher fees and reduced service, the department said.

“The department sued to block this merger because it would eliminate competition between US Airways and American and put consumers at risk of higher prices and reduced service,” said Bill Baer, Assistant Attorney General in charge of the Department of Justice’s Antitrust Division. 

American and US Airways compete directly on more than a thousand routes where one or both offer connecting service, representing tens of billions of dollars in annual revenues.   They engage in head-to-head competition with nonstop service on routes worth about $2 billion in annual route-wide revenues.  Eliminating this head-to-head competition would give the merged airline the incentive and ability to raise airfares, the department said in its complaint.

According to the department’s complaint, the vast majority of domestic airline routes are already highly concentrated.  The merger would create the largest airline in the world and result in four airlines controlling more than 80 percent of the United States commercial air travel market. 

The merger would also entrench the merged airline as the dominant carrier at Washington Reagan National Airport in Virginia, with control of 69 percent of the take-off and landing slots.   The merged airline would have a monopoly on 63 percent of the nonstop routes served out of Reagan National airport.   

As a result, Washington, D.C., area passengers would likely see higher prices and fewer choices if the merger is allowed, the department said in its complaint.   Blocking the merger will preserve current competition and service, including flights that US Airways currently offers from Washington’s Reagan National Airport.

The complaint also alleges that the merger is likely to result in higher ancillary fees, such as fees charged for checked bags and flight changes. 

The department also said that the merger will make coordination easier among the legacy carriers.   Although low-cost carriers such as Southwest and JetBlue offer consumers many benefits, they fly to fewer locations and are unlikely to be able to constrain the coordinated behavior among those carriers.

 Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott announced today that the State of Texas, along with Arizona, Florida, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Virginia, the Distr...

Article Image

Southwest fined for violating price advertising rule

It sounded like a great deal, but there was only one problem: A lot of people couldn't take advantage of it.

So said the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) in levying a $200,000 fine against Southwest Airlines for violating the full-fare advertising rules. DOT also ordered the carrier to cease and desist from further violations.

“Consumers should be able to trust that the price they see advertised is the price they’ll pay for a seat,” Transportation Secretary Anthony Foxx said. “DOT will continue to take enforcement action against carriers and ticket agents when our price advertising rules are violated.”

Great fares – few seats

According to DOT’s Aviation Enforcement Office, Southwest advertised one-way, nonstop fares “for $100 or less” for travel on Feb. 14, 2013, but failed to include a reasonable number of seats available in a significant number of city-pair markets in the fare sale.

In addition, on Jan. 30, 2013, Southwest advertised $66 one-way fares from Dallas Love Field to Branson, Mo., between March 1, 2013, and March 21, 2013. However, there were no seats available at the sale fare on any day during the sale period.

By advertising fares for which a reasonable number of seats were not available and advertising fares that were not available at all, DOT says Southwest violated the full fare advertising rule and engaged in prohibited unfair and deceptive practices.  

It sounded like a great deal, but there was only one problem: A lot of people couldn't take advantage of it. So said the U.S. Department of Transportation...

Article Image

Know your rights when you fly

No matter what season you're traveling – summer or winter – weather can throw the airlines' schedules into turmoil. When that happens you can easily find yourself stranded in a strange city's airport.

In recent years airlines have reduced flights and have less capacity than they once did. A few cancelled flights can quickly cause havoc throughout the system.

Recently a Des Moines, Iowa high school group toured France with no travel-related problems until they returned to the U.S. Then, Marcy Baustain and her French Club students found themselves stranded in Detroit when the flight on their final leg, back to Des Moines, was cancelled due to weather.

"Getting re-booked was difficult because it's very tough to find 18 seats on a flight – especially to Des Moines, since bigger planes aren't scheduled through there," said Baustian.

The group spent the night in the Detroit airport before finally getting re-booked on a flight to Kansas City. But then that flight was cancelled because of weather.

Eventually, the group chartered a bus – at extra expense – to get the rest of the way home. The school filed a claim to be reimbursed by the airline for the cost of the ground transportation. Does it have a case?

Legal gray area

"It can be difficult to know when a situation that started as inconvenient has crossed the line into a violation of rights," says Ann Cosimano, General Counsel for ARAG, a company describing itself as a global provider of legal solutions. "Knowing when to be patient – or when to speak up – can take some of the stress out of travel." 

For air travelers these days, it is important to know your rights when you fly.

Delayed or cancelled

Consumers rate Delta Airlines
Salig, of Walnut Creek, Calif., said he waited through numerous delays at the Atlanta airport on a Delta flight, without receiving any information.

“Finally, was notified at around 10:00 PM that the flight has been cancelled, due to crew not being available,” Salig posted at ConsumerAffairs. “Was herded into the customer service line. Waited in line for three hours to receive a $25 voucher which was expired, and an amenity kit, and was told that Delta is not booking any hotels. I received my boarding pass for the next day via the automated kiosk). Hence standing in line for 3 hours till 1:30 am was a waste of time. I was able to get my own hotel (out of pocket costs) + pay $1,200 for a ticket for the pleasure of waiting for six hours and cancellations.” .

ARAG says if your flight is delayed or cancelled for problems beyond anyone's control, like weather or safety issues, most airlines will rebook you on the next available flight at no charge. They may even book you with another airline without charging you extra. However, airlines are not required to provide any amenities, such as meal vouchers or hotel rooms, in this situation.

At the same time, if your flight is delayed or cancelled for something the airline could control, such as a maintenance issue, the airline will likely re-book you on the next available flight, either theirs or another airline's, at no charge. The airline is still not required to provide amenities, but many will provide meal vouchers and even hotel rooms and grooming kits if your delay causes an unexpected overnight stay.

When you're bumped

Consumers rate Copa Airlines
“COPA Airlines bumped us (my wife and myself) off their 11:50 morning flight 472 from Panama City's Tocumen International Airport to LAX ,” an anonymous traveler writes. COPA re-scheduled us to fly on their 6:40 PM evening flight 302 instead. We spent 11 hours at the airport. COPA gave us a lunch certificate and a $300 future travel certificate (which we would never use because of this incident) demonstrating their admission of guilt. In two identical emails, sent January 10 and 13, we requested reimbursement from COPA for $250.80 in out-of-pocket expenses tied directly to arriving at LAX at approximately 11 PM. COPA never replied to these emails. We enlisted the assistance of a consumer advocate who apparently had no better luck than we did.

Bumping is quite common these days because airlines routinely oversell flights. They usually ask for volunteers to step aside, rewarding them with another flight and other compensation.

If no one volunteers and you're bumped involuntarily, ARAG says you should receive a written statement from the airline explaining your rights and how the airline decided which passengers were bumped. If you're not re-booked and scheduled to arrive at your destination within one hour of your originally scheduled arrival time, you are entitled to compensation in the form of a check or cash. The amount will vary and you must have a confirmed reservation and have checked-in with the airline within their deadlines.

On the tarmac

Tarmac delays can be excruciating but fortunately, in the wake of a new law, they are fewer and shorter. If you are delayed on the tarmac of a domestic flight before taking off or after landing, you have rights if the delay is more than three hours. Federal rules bar most U.S. airlines from sitting on the tarmac for more than three hours unless there are safety or security issues.

If you find yourself on the tarmac of a domestic flight, ARAG says you are entitled to food and water no later than two hours after the delay begins. Restrooms must remain operable and medical attention must be available if needed.

No matter what season you're traveling – summer or winter – weather can throw the airlines' schedules into turmoil. When that happens you can e...

Article Image

American Eagle fined for Christmas 2012 tarmac delays

Lengthy tarmac delays by 10 American Eagle Airlines flights last Christmas will cost the carrier a bundle.

The U. S. Department of Transportation (DOT) fined American Eagle $200,000 for delays that took place at Dallas-Fort Worth International Airport on Dec. 25, 2012, and ordered the airline to cease and desist from future violations of the tarmac delay rule.

“Airline passengers have rights, and the Department of Transportation has rules in place to protect them from being stuck on a tarmac waiting hours to get off their plane," said DOT Secretary Anthony Foxx. “We will continue to take enforcement action when airlines violate our tarmac delay rules.”

Waiting too long

According to an investigation by the Department’s Aviation Enforcement Office revealed, 10 American Eagle flights experience tarmac delays that exceeded the three-hour limit last Dec. 25 at Dallas-Fort Worth during a snow and ice storm.

One of the flights, arriving from Sioux Falls, S.D., with 42 passengers landed at 2:48 p.m., but was not assigned a gate until 5:30 p.m.. Passengers were finally allowed to leave the aircraft at 6:36 p.m. after a tarmac delay of three hours, 48 minutes.

A second flight, carrying 37 passengers from Baton Rouge, La, landed at 3:29 p.m., but the aircraft was not dispatched to an area where passengers could deplane until 6:00 p.m.. The plane parked at 7:00 p.m., but passengers were not able to leave the plane until 8:01 p.m., four hours and 32 minutes after landing.

Rules violated

Under DOT rules, U.S. airlines operating aircraft with 30 or more passenger seats cannot keep domestic flights on the tarmac for more than three hours at most U.S. airports without giving passengers an opportunity to leave the plane. Exceptions are allowed only for safety, security or air traffic control-related reasons. The rules require carriers to include the three-hour provision in their tarmac delay contingency plan commitments to passengers.

Under an expansion of the tarmac delay rule that took effect Aug. 23, 2011, international flights at covered U.S. airports are now prohibited from remaining on the tarmac for more than four hours without permitting passengers the opportunity to deplane -- subject to the same exceptions as the rule for domestic flights.

The investigation found that the remaining eight American Eagle flights -- seven domestic flights and one international flight -- experiencing long tarmac delays that day at Dallas-Fort Worth were not violations because they fell under exceptions to the rule.

This is the second fine against American Eagle for violating the tarmac delay rule. In 2011, the airline was fined $900,000 for lengthy tarmac delays that took place at Chicago O’Hare International Airport on May 29, 2011.

Lengthy tarmac delays by 10 American Eagle Airlines flights last Christmas will cost the carrier a bundle. The U. S. Department of Transportation (DOT) fi...

Article Image

TSA launches new process for its Pre-Check program

Boarding an airliner will soon be less of a hassle for a lot of people.

The Transportation Security Administration (TSA) says a new process it's adding will let more U.S. citizens enroll in TSA PreCheck, an expedited screening program.

Being signed up for the program allows pre-approved airline travelers to leave on their shoes, light outerwear and belt, keep their laptop in its case and their 3-1-1 compliant liquids/gels bag in a carry-on in select screening lanes.

To be eligible for TSA PreCheck, travelers had to opt-in through an airline’s frequent flier program, or be enrolled in one of CBP’s Global Entry, SENTRI or NEXUS Trusted Traveler programs. As a result, more than 12 million travelers have experienced TSA Pre-Check at 40 airports nationwide. This action will expand the availability of the program to a larger portion of traveling U.S. citizens.

The National Air Transportation Association  (NATA), an aviation lobbying organization, says the new process is a step in the right direction.

“NATA welcomes the expansion of the PreCheck program and TSA’s continuing efforts towards developing a more risk-based solution to aviation security,” said Thomas L. Hendricks, the group's president and CEO.

Online application

Starting later this year, U.S. citizens will be able to apply online and visit an enrollment site to provide identification and fingerprints. TSA will start the program at two initial enrollment sites -- Washington Dulles International Airport and Indianapolis International Airport -- with plans to expand to additional enrollment sites nationwide.

“This initiative will increase the number of U.S. citizens eligible to receive expedited screening, through TSA PreCheck,” said TSA Administrator John S. Pistole. “TSA Pre-Check enables us to focus on the travelers we know the least about, adding efficiency and effectiveness to the screening process.”

Not a freebie

The TSA Pre-Check application program requires a background check, fingerprints, and an anticipated enrollment fee of $85 for a five-year membership. Once approved, travelers will receive a Known Traveler Number (KTN) and the opportunity to go through TSA Pre-Check lanes at security checkpoints at participating airports.

That doesn't mean the end of pat-downs, though. TSA says it will always incorporate random and unpredictable security measures throughout the airport and no individual will be guaranteed expedited screening.

Boarding an airliner will soon be less of a hassle for a lot of people. The Transportation Security Administration http://www.tsa.gov/ (TSA) says a new p...

Article Image

Virgin, JetBlue, Southwest first in their customers' hearts

Americans love to complain about their airlines but, believe it or not, there is some unanimity in choosing the airlines they dislike the least, if we may put it that way.

Virgin America, JetBlue and Southwest leave their old-line competitors sitting at the gate when it comes to consumer affection and loyalty, although they're not necessarily seen as more reliable -- with the notable exception of Southwest.

Fully 44% of those surveyed by E-Score said Southwest was reliable, more than twice as many as said the same for American or United. Southwest was also ranked as the most family-friendly, perhaps because of its open-seating policy, which makes it easier for families to travel together.

"The survey suggests the relatively solid loyalty scores for Virgin, JetBlue and Southwest are reflective of consumers not being nickel-and-dimed for things like bags and meals,” said Gerry Philpott, president of E-Poll Market Research.

“While only a handful of consumers feel the airlines are reliable and trustworthy, the higher scores for appeal would seem to indicate a price and convenience sensitivity,” Philpott noted.

Overall, a majority of consumers gave the U.S. airline industry a big thumbs-up on overall appeal and brand loyalty,but not for attributes such as reliability or trustworthiness.

Americans love to complain about their airlines but, believe it or not, there is some unanimity in choosing the airlines they dislike the least, if we may...

Article Image

How to get a cheaper air fare

The airline industry has dramatically changed over the last couple of decades. There's more competition but fewer flights. Published fares have remained stable but a myriad of fees can quickly raise the cost of flying.

To maximize profitability airlines try to fly with every seat sold and to do that, they offer tickets at different prices at different times. Knowing how the system works can give consumers an edge when it comes to buying a ticket. Not knowing how the system works, on the other hand, can end up costing you money.

The first thing to know is that there is an optimal day to buy your ticket. According to a study by CheapAir.com, an online airline booking site, the fare difference between the best day to buy your airline ticket and the worst is $236. If you wait to book within seven days of the flight the spread is even wider.

The study looked at 25 million fares and determined that, on average, the best time to buy an airline ticket is 49 days in advance. However, that's just the average. There can be a huge variance depending on where you are going and when.

Like the stock market

Jeff Klee, CEO of CheapAir.com, likens buying an airline ticket to investing in the stock market. You have to follow the market by checking air fares on a regular basis. Timing is everything.

“It's crazy, it's unpredictable and if you are checking frequently you are much more likely to catch it when suddenly there's a sale,” Klee said.

Airline tickets are very sensitive to supply and demand. Each flight has a finite supply of seats. The variable is the demand. When there is less demand the fares are lower. When demand goes up, so do the fares.

“Every flight probably has 10 to 15 different fares,” Klee said. “The first tickets sold are at the lowest fare and it goes up from there.”

While buying your ticket far enough in advance – but not too far – will save you money, so will flying on the right day.

When you fly matters

“Airlines generally fly the same schedules every day but there are obviously going to be some days that are more popular to fly, like Fridays and Sundays,” Klee said. “When airlines discount fares they normally target the flights that are toughest to fill up.”

Tuesdays and Wednesdays are generally the least expensive days for domestic flights and Friday and Sunday are the most expensive. Monday, Thursday, and Saturday are somewhere in the middle. According to CheapAir's study, the difference between a Tuesday flight and a Sunday flight is $29 each way on average, or $58 round trip.

When flying during the holidays, says Klee, “all bets are off.” Cheap fares are going to be almost impossible to find. It will pay to book as early as possible since the airlines will be confident they can sell every seat.

Don't forget fees

When looking at an airline's published fare, make sure you also know its fee structure. These days airlines tack on fees for bags, seat assignments and other things passengers took for granted in the past.

“For the airlines it's great because there are no taxes on them, it all goes into the airline's pocket,” Klee said.

If you are flying to or from a major city, make sure you consider flights from all area airports. Generally that will pay off by having more flights to choose from. That raises the level of competition for your ticket dollars among the airlines and can generally result in a deal. For example, when checking for flights from Washington, DC to Los Angeles, CheapAir.com shows flights leaving from all three DC area airports to the airports in the Los Angeles area.

When traveling with your family or a large group, don't expect to get a group discount. In fact, you could easily end up paying the highest fares. That's because the flight probably has a limited number of cheap tickets, which you won't get if you try to buy four or five at a time.

Klee suggests first seeking fares for the whole group to make sure the flight still has enough seats to accommodate all travelers. Next, search for tickets for just two people. If the flight still has two low-price fares left, you'll get them. Book the tickets two at a time until you the group completely booked.

“It can be tricky and it's not necessarily easy to do but it's valid, though very counter-intuitive,” Klee said.

Mix and match

Finally, don't be afraid to “mix and match” airlines. For example one airline might have the best fare going to your destination while a competitor might have the best fare on the return flight.

“You once had to buy a round-trip ticket to get any kind of a good deal,” Klee said. “Over the last five years or so airlines have gone more and more to one-way fares. The Internet has really encouraged this. That gives you the ability to book on one airline going and another coming back and not be penalized for it. In fact, to the contrary, you can often benefit from that.”

To get a good airfare Klee said it helps to stay in touch with what the airlines are charging. One way to do that is to sign up for airfare alerts. Just remember that these alerts will mostly present the cheapest fares that often come with plenty of restrictions and won't be practical in most cases.

However, they can give you an idea of what the base fare is going to be. When choosing a flight, realize that in most cases, you aren't going to get the lowest fare offered. In other words, don't be overly picky.

“If you're dead set on getting the absolute lowest possible fare you're probably not going to get it right,” Klee said.

The airline industry has dramatically changed over the last couple of decades. There's more competition but fewer flights. Published fares have remained st...

Article Image

FAA sets new pilot qualification standards

First officers, widely known incorrectly as "co-pilots," who fly for U.S. passenger and cargo airlines, will soon have to meet stiffer qualification standards.

A new rule from by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), will require first officers to hold an Airline Transport Pilot (ATP) certificate, requiring 1,500 hours total time as a pilot. They previously, were required to have only a commercial pilot certificate, which requires 250 hours of flight time.

The rule also requires first officers to have an aircraft type rating, which involves additional training and testing specific to the airplanes they fly.

"Safety will be my overriding priority as Secretary, so I am especially pleased to mark my first week by announcing a rule that will help us maintain our unparalleled safety record,” said Transportation Secretary Anthony Foxx. “We owe it to the traveling public to have only the most qualified and best trained pilots."

Colgan Air crash

The new regulations stem -- in part -- from the tragic crash of Colgan Air 3407 in February 2009, and address a Congressional mandate in the Airline Safety and Federal Aviation Administration Extension Act of 2010 to ensure that both pilots and co-pilots receive the ATP certification.

The new rule is one of several rulemakings required by the act, including the new flight duty and rest requirements for pilots that were completed in December 2011, and new training requirements expected this fall for air carrier training programs to ensure pilots know how to react properly in difficult operating environments.

"The rule gives first officers a stronger foundation of aeronautical knowledge and experience before they fly for an air carrier,” said FAA Administrator Michael Huerta. “With this rule and our efforts to address pilot fatigue -- both initiatives championed by the families of Colgan flight 3407 -- we're making a safe system even safer."

Rule highlights

The rule also includes:

  • A requirement for a pilot to have a minimum of 1,000 flight hours as a co-pilot in air carrier operations prior to serving as a captain for a U.S. airline.
  • Enhanced training requirements for an ATP certificate, including 50 hours of multi-engine flight experience and completion of a new FAA-approved training program.
  • An allowance for pilots with fewer than 1,500 hours of flight time or who have not reached the minimum age of 23 to obtain a “restricted privileges” ATP certificate. A restricted privileges ATP certificate allows a pilot to serve as a co-pilot until he or she obtains the necessary 1,500 hours. The options are:
    • Military pilots with 750 hours total time as a pilot;
    • Graduates holding a Bachelor’s degree with an aviation major with 1,000 hours total time as a pilot;
    • Graduates holding an Associate’s degree with an aviation major with 1,250 hours;
    • Pilots who are at least 21 years old with 1,500 flight hours.

First officers, also known as co-pilots, who fly for U.S. passenger and cargo airlines, will soon have to meet stiffer qualification standards. A new rule...

Article Image

Domestic flight tarmac delays rise in May

Commercial airlines flying within the U.S. had a little trouble getting off the ground during May.

According to the Transportation Department’s Air Travel Consumer Report, carriers reported five tarmac delays of more than three hours on domestic flights. However, there were no tarmac delays of more than four hours on an international flight during the month.

The 16 airlines that file on-time performance data say 79.4% of their flights arrived on time in May, compared with the 83.4% on-time rate from May 2012 and the 77.3% mark posted a month earlier.

The report also includes data on cancellations, chronically delayed flights, and the causes of flight delays. In addition, there is information on mishandled baggage reports filed by consumers with the carriers, and consumer service, disability, and discrimination complaints.

The complete report can be found on the Department of Transportation website.

Commercial airlines flying within the U.S. had a little trouble getting off the ground during May. According to the Transportation Department’s Air Travel...

Article Image

Delta fined for violating bumping compensation rules

When an airline oversells a flight, Department of Transportation (DOT) regulations require it to seek volunteers willing to give up their seats for compensation. If there aren't enough volunteers, the airline then bumps passengers involuntarily.

Passengers are entitled to a written statement describing their rights and explaining how the airline decides whom it will bump first. In most cases, those bumped involuntarily also are entitled to cash compensation of up to $1,300 depending on the value of their tickets and the length of time they're delayed.

DOT says Delta Air Lines broke rules outlining those passenger rights, and has fined the carrier $750,000. The airline was also ordered to cease and desist from further violations.

“Airline passengers deserve to be treated fairly, especially if they are forced to miss a flight because an airline oversold seats,” said U.S. Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood. “Consumers have rights, and we will continue to take enforcement action when airlines violate our rules to protect the traveling public.”

Numerous incidents

In March 2012, DOT found that -- in a number of instances -- Delta failed to seek volunteers before bumping passengers involuntarily, or bumped passengers involuntarily without providing them a written notice describing their rights or informing them that they had a right to cash compensation.

In addition, the carrier classified some passengers who were bumped involuntarily as having volunteered to give up their seats, which both violated the passengers’ rights to compensation and resulted in inaccurate bumping reports filed with DOT. Delta also violated its published customer commitment, which included a pledge to obey DOT’s bumping regulations.

Delta may use up to $425,000 of the penalty to buy electronic tablets to record consumers’ decisions on whether they agreed to leave a flight and accept compensation offered by the airline, as well to train its personnel on using the tablets. The data collected can be used to help correct any problems the airline may have in complying with the bumping rules.

This is Delta’s second violation of the bumping rules in the past four years. On July 9, 2009, it was fined $375,000 for violations similar to those included in today’s consent order.

When an airline oversells a flight, Department of Transportation (DOT) regulations require it to seek volunteers willing to give up their seats for compens...

Article Image

Tarmac delays minimal for domestic flights in April

If you were took an international flight from the U.S in April, getting away on time was no problem. For domestic flights, though, there were a few delays.

The U.S. Department of Transportation’s Air Travel Consumer Report says there were two tarmac delays of more than three hours on domestic flights, but no tarmac delays of more than four hours on an international flights.

The 16 carriers that file their on-time performance data with the Department reported that 77.3% of their flights arrived on time in April, compared with an on-time rate of 79.8% in March and 86.3% a year earlier.

The report also includes data on cancellations, chronically delayed flights, and the causes of flight delays, along with information on mishandled baggage reports filed by consumers with the carriers, and consumer service, disability, and discrimination complaints. Reports of incidents involving the loss, death, or injury of pets traveling by air are included as well

The full report is available on the Department of Transportation website.

If you were took an international flight from the U.S in April, getting away on time was not problem. For domestic flights, though, there were a few dela. ...

Article Image

TSA completes removal of "backscatter" x-ray scanners

The "backscatter" x-ray body scanners that caused so much consternation in U.S. airports have been removed. The Transportation Security Agency (TSA) says the last of the scanners has been taken out of service.

The TSA was forced to remove the machines after Congress required that the devices produce only generic images. They've been replaced by about 700 body scanners that use what is called Automatic Target Recognition (ATR) software, which display items on a generic body outline.

But TSA says the backscatter machines could return if their manufacturer, Rapiscan, comes up software that would return a more generic image to the TSA screening officers.

Critics of the machines have also objected to the radiation travelers are exposed to when they pass through the scanners.

Record firearms seizure

For its part, TSA notes that it is business as usual, and then some, at the nation's airports. The agency says it discovered 65 firearms being carried by passengers last week, a record number. Of the 65, 54 were loaded and 19 had rounds chambered.

In one case, a passenger with a prosthetic leg got a pat-down at Salt Lake City after passing through the x-ray machine when officers noted something unusual in the image. They found a fully-loaded .22-caliber firearm inside the man's boot, strapped to his prosthetic leg. 

Some of the firearms discovered last week in carry-on baggageThe "backscatter" x-ray body scanners that caused so much consternation in U.S. airports h...

Article Image

Airline flights are likely to be crowded this summer

Have you booked your airline yet for your summer vacation? If not, it's probably a good idea to do it sooner rather than later.

Airlines for America (A4A), the industry trade organization is forecasting that more people will fly this summer than a year ago -- and that a record number of those passengers will fly internationally. A4A expects U.S. airlines will carry close to 209 million passengers globally from June through August -- a 1% jump from the same period in last year. That includes 27 million international passengers, a record number for U.S. airlines.

This would be the largest summer volume for U.S. airlines since 2008, when more than 210 million traveled. The all-time high was summer 2007, when U.S. Airlines carried more than 217 million people. When you book, keep in mind that A4A expects the busiest travel days to be Thursdays and Fridays between the middle of June and the first week of August.

The cost of flying

A4A attributes the increase to rising household net worth and corporate profits, strong airline operational performance and recent relief in energy prices. Data released by the U.S. Bureau of Transportation Statistics (BTS) indicate that airfares remain a bargain, with the average inflation-adjusted domestic airfare (including taxes) down 0.2% to $374 in the fourth quarter of 2012, compared with the average fare of $375 in the fourth quarter of 2011. BTS further reported that since 1995 inflation-adjusted domestic airfares have declined 13.1% versus a 49.6% increase in overall consumer prices.

“As we enter the peak summer travel season, Airlines for America expects U.S. airlines to see modest year-over-year growth in both domestic and international travel, including an all-time high for passengers traveling internationally,” said A4A Vice President and Chief Economist John Heimlich. “It’s a great time to fly as airfares remain a bargain and airlines are delivering strong on-time performance.”

But, the improving economy cuts both ways. As ConsumerAffairs recently reported, more people flying means more competition for cheap fares. And that could make them hard to find.

Have you booked your airline yet for your summer vacation? If not, it's probably a good idea to do it sooner rather than later. Airlines for America (A4A)...

Article Image

No lengthy tarmac delays for domestic flights during March

March was a good month for taking a commercial flight, whether it was domestic or international.

The Transportation Department (DOT) says airlines reported no tarmac delays of more than three hours on domestic flights, and just one exceeding four hours on an international flight during the month. The long tarmac delay involved a flight from Bogota, Colombia to Orlando, Fla., that diverted to Miami on March 24. DOT is investigating.

That represents a big improvement from February, when there were 34 domestic flights with delays of three hours or more.

Under a rule that took effect Aug. 23, 2011, all U.S. and foreign airlines operating at least one aircraft with 30 or more passenger seats must report lengthy tarmac delays at U.S. airports. Exceptions to the time limits for both domestic and international flights are allowed only for safety, security, or air traffic control-related reasons. Severe weather could cause or worsen such situations.

The full report, which includes data on on-time performance, cancellations, chronically delayed flights, and the causes of flight delays, among other things, can found here.

March was a good month for taking a commercial flight, whether it was domestic or international. The Transportation Department (DOT) says airlines reporte...

Article Image

Air China pays price for violating tarmac delay rule

Air China failed to make announcements every 30 minutes to passengers on an aircraft delayed at New York’s JFK International Airport last July that they had an opportunity to leave the plane as it sat at the gate with the door open.

And for that, the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) fined the carrier and ordered it to cease and desist from further violations of federal rules.

“Airline passengers have rights, including the right to be informed that they can leave a plane that is facing long delays at the gate,” said U.S. Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood. “Our tarmac rules are meant to protect passengers from being stuck on grounded aircraft for hours on end, and we will continue to work with airlines and airports to make sure that travelers are treated with the respect they deserve before, during, and after their flights.”

Stuck on the plane

Air China Flight 982 was scheduled to fly from JFK to Beijing Capital International Airport on July 15, 2012. The plane sat at the gate from 6:40 p.m. to 8:26 p.m. with the door open, but the carrier failed to make the required announcements.

The aircraft did not take off for Beijing until 10:51 p.m.

Air China failed to make announcements every 30 minutes to passengers on an aircraft delayed at New York’s JFK International Airport last July that they ha...

Article Image

No letup in fight against knives on planes

Besieged by protests from flight attendants, the families of 9/11 victims and others, the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) is delaying its new rule that allows passengers to carry small knives aboard commercial aircraft.

“The attacks in Boston prove once again that we can’t be selective in our vigilance. We must guard against all threats, big and small,” said Rebecca Marchand, whose husband was a flight attendant murdered on United Airlines flight 175, in a letter to TSA Administrator John Pistole. “As the wife of a flight attendant killed on 9/11, and the mother of a flight attendant who flies today, I have earned the right to say this: Knives have NO place on an airplane."

TSA said it "temporarily" delayed implementation of the rule to allow more time for public input.  

The Association of Flight Attendants CWA (AFA), which represents about 90,000 flight attendants, is pressing to not only delay the rule, but to prevent it from ever going into effect. The standoff began late last year when TSA announced it was revising its list of prohibited items and said the category of small pocket knives, which had been on the list since 9/11, was being removed.

Why?

Why would TSA allow knives in the cabin when it prohibits so many other objects? The agency has said very little in the way of explanation.

“The only public statement TSA has been making on the issue is that the changes are part of a risk-based approach to security,” said Corey Caldwell, a spokesman for AFA. “Additionally, it also conforms to EU standards.”

A “risk-based” approach means that TSA has concluded that there is very little risk in allowing passengers to carry small pocket knives. But the flight attendants and others who question the move point out the 9/11 hijackers took over four planes using box cutters as weapons. Box cutters would still be banned under the new rule.

“TSA’s recent decision to change the list of prohibited items to allow knives and sporting equipment on board planes defies logic,” said Rep. Maxine Waters (D-Calif.), at a news conference with AFACWA officials. “TSA apparently made this decision without any formal consultation with the people who would be most impacted by the decision – flight attendants, pilots, air marshals, and passengers. I urge TSA to keep knives and sporting equipment on the list of prohibited items and consult with all stakeholders before making any changes to this critical list.”

Other lawmakers have questioned the TSA move. Rep. Janice Hahn (D-Calif.) called it a “huge step backward.” She said knives are a danger to passengers but are particularly a threat to flight attendants. She expressed relief last week when TSA said it would delay lifting the ban and suggested most passengers feel the same way.

“The American public clearly saw that it is common sense to keep these potential weapons off our airplanes,” she said.

Pressing its advantage

With TSA apparently blinking, AFA isn't relenting in its effort to force an unconditional surrender on the issue.

"We will not stand down from the fight to keep knives off planes permanently,” said Veda Shook, AFA International President. “The recent TSA announcement to delay implementation does not change our efforts. We will continue to focus on a legislative path that permanently bans knives from the cabin. We need a common-sense approach to national security just like our country needs a common-sense budget that maintains our nation's aviation system as the best in the world."

Before TSA can change its list of prohibited items, it must submit its new rule to public comment. The flight attendants union says it believe TSA has received overwhelmingly negative comments on the proposed rule.

“If those procedures are followed, we have no doubt that the (TSA) Administrator will conclude that knives have no place on our planes and will leave the rule barring 'weapons' in place,” AFA said in a statement.

Here's a complete list of the items currently banned from the aircraft cabin.

The Transportation Security Administration (TSA), the federal agency that screens passengers boarding commercial aircraft, is delaying its new rule that al...

Article Image

American Airlines struggling to resume service after computer issues

American Airlines said late this afternoon that it had resolved the computer issues that had  grounded all of its flights today.

The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) issued a "ground stop" for all American and American Eagle flights at the airline's request earlier Tuesday.

American, which operates about 3,300 flights a day, managed to resolve the unspecified problem around 5 p.m. Eastern time but by then, hundreds of flights had been canceled and countless others were in doubt as crews and equipment were scattered around the country far from where they were supposed to be.

The computer system, which is operated by SABRE Holdings, is at the heart of the airline's operations. It not only handles reservations but also crew scheduling, flight manifests and other crucial information.

American said the problem was not with the computer system itself but rather with its ability to access the network.

Currently operating in bankruptcy, American is in the process of merging with US Airways to create what the companies say will be a "premier global carrier." Today's incident does little to burnish the new image the companies hope to build. 

Nor does a recent lawsuit that accuses US Airways of racial discrimination for forcing two African-American men to change clothes if they wanted to fly in first class. 

American Airlines has grounded all of its flights while it tries to resolve a problem with its computer network. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) ...

Article Image

FAA orders special inspections of 737s

The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) is ordering special inspections of potentially defective parts on the Boeing 737, the most widely-used jetliner in the world.

The agency said more than 1,000 of the medium-range jets could have improperly manufactured parts that could cause pilots to lose control.

The FAA directive, as published in the Federal Register, was prompted by "reports of an incorrect procedure used to apply the wear and corrosion protective surface coating to attach pins of the horizontal stabilizer rear spar," the agency said.

"We are issuing this AD to prevent premature failure of the attach pins, which could cause reduced structural integrity of the horizontal stabilizer to fuselage attachment, resulting in loss of control of the airplane," the directive continued.

The directive applies to relatively recent models of the workhorse airplane, including the 737-600, -700, -700C, -800, -900, and -900ER series.  

The potentially defective parts secure the horizontal stabilizers that control the up and down movement of the nose. 

Consumers rate Delta Airlines

The FAA noted that Delta Airlines had asked that some of its airplanes be excluded from the directive, saying that they were not delivered during the time when the suspect parts were being installed.

"We disagree with the request," the agency said.

Although the directive technically applies only to U.S. carriers, it's expected that airlines around the world will perform the inspections.

An Alaska Air 737-800The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) is ordering special inspections of potentially defective parts on the Boeing 737, the mo...

Article Image

Tarmac delays galore during February

If you happened to be flying in or out of Charlotte, N.C, in mid-February, it's probably an experience you won't want to repeat any time soon,

According to the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT), there were 34 tarmac delays of more than three hours on domestic flights. All of them occurred on February 16 and involved flights departing from or arriving at Charlotte International Airport, where a snowstorm pounded the area.

Additionally, the delays involved US Airways or its code share partners and are under investigation by the Department.

Meanwhile, DOT reports there were no tarmac delays of more than four hours on international flights in February.

The DOT's ’s Air Travel Consumer Report, which also includes data on on-time performance, cancellations, chronically delayed flights and the causes of flight delays, can be found here.

If you happened to be flying in or out of Charlotte, N.C, in mid-February, it's probably an experience you won't want to repeat any time soon, According t...

Article Image

Virgin America ranks first, United last in airline quality ratings

There's nothing quite like knocking it out of the park on your first time at bat.  That's what Virgin America Airlines has accomplished, taking first place in the latest national Airline Quality Rating, released today. United was last. 

Although passengers are still grumpy and complaining more than ever, overall airline performance in 2012 was the second highest in the 23 years that researchers from Wichita State and Pursdue have conducted the study. Overall, seven airlines improved and five declined in 2012.

Here's the complete report for 2012, with the previous year's rating showed in parenthesis. 

1. Virgin America (new to the ranking this year)
2. JetBlue (3)
3. AirTran (1)
4. Delta (6)
5. Hawaiian (2)
6. Alaska (5)
7. Frontier (4)
8. Southwest (7)
9. US Airways (8)
10. American (10)
11. American Eagle (15)
12. SkyWest (9)
13. ExpressJet (not rated in 2011)
14. United (12)Business is too good?

Although on-time performance and bag handling improved in 2012, denied boardings and the customer complaint rates were higher for the year. Researchers say that's partly the result of improving business and high passenger loads. Crowded planes, in other words.

"When you look at the past 13 years, you find that the airline industry performs most efficiently when the system isn't stressed by high passenger volume and high number of airplanes in the air. Every time there are more planes in the sky and more people flying, airline performance suffers," said Headley. Dean Headley, associate professor of marketing at the W. Frank Barton School of Business at Wichita State University.

Consumers rate United Airlines

The challenge is whether airline performance quality improvements can be maintained as more people choose to fly. Or does the infrastructure and air traffic control technology limit what the airlines can do?

Hawaiian Airlines had the best on-time performance (93.4 percent) for 2012, and ExpressJet and American had the worst (76.9 percent).

JetBlue had the lowest involuntary denied boardings at 0.01 per 10,000 passengers. SkyWest had the highest involuntary denied boarding rate at 2.32 per 10,000 passengers.

Virgin America had the best baggage handling rate (0.87 mishandled bags per 1,000 passengers) of all airlines, and American Eagle had the worst baggage handling rate (5.80 mishandled bags per 1,000 passengers) of all the airlines.

Southwest again had the lowest consumer complaint rate (0.25 per 100,000 passengers) of all airlines. United had the highest consumer complaint rate (4.24 per 100,000 passengers) of all airlines rated.

The majority of complaints were for flight problems (32.7 percent), reservations, ticketing and boarding (14.6 percent), customer service (14.3 percent) and baggage (12.4 percent).

There's nothing quite like knocking it out of the park on your first time at bat.  That's what Virgin America Airlines has accomplished, taking first ...

Article Image

The continuing travails of air travel

Since the depths of the post-9/11 recession, the U.S. airline industry has staged a strong comeback. Mergers and the discovery that passengers could be charged fees for all sorts of things has paced the recovery.

But what's been good for the airlines hasn't necessarily been so pleasant for passengers. The planes are usually packed to the bulkheads because the airlines have reduced capacity. Again, perhaps a good business move but giving consumers fewer choices and a lot less legroom.

In its latest accounting, the U.S. Department of Transportation reports domestic and systemwide load factors reached record levels in December. The increase isn't due to carrying more passengers – it's the result of a year-over-year decrease in capacity.

The numbers show that in December 2012, Southwest carried more system and domestic passengers than any other U.S. airline. United Airlines, following its merger with Continental, carried the most international passengers.

For the third straight year, Delta carried more total system passengers in 2012 than any other airline. Southwest carried more domestic passengers than any other U.S. airline for the ninth consecutive year.

Sounding off

What was it like for passengers? Some took to the Internet to let us know.

Consumers rate United Airlines

“I traveled via United Airlines for Christmas to visit my family and on my way back to Los Angeles, United damaged not one but two pieces of my luggage,” Natalina, of Los Angeles, wrote in a ConsumerAffairs post.

Damaged or lost luggage happens but when it does, consumers expect the airline to make things right. One of Natalina's bags was an expensive Coach carry-on. Why would Natalina check such an expensive piece of luggage? Well, she didn't mean to.

“The designer carry-on was not a checked bag as I was forced to give it to the flight attendant due to the overhead compartments being full on my flight,” she wrote.

Again, that's a product of a very crowded flight and something to keep in mind when you fly. Just because you think your bag is a carry-on doesn't mean it will turn out to be one. In addition to damage, if you've packed something valuable in your carry-on it can end up getting checked and exposed to theft.

As for Natalina, her biggest complaint is that United refused to replace the damaged Coach bag but insists on trying to repair it. Making matters worse, at last report Natalina said United sent her bag somewhere for repair and has been unresponsive to her efforts to get it back.

Fewer flights, fewer planes

Because airlines are flying fewer planes these days, it can cause problems for passengers when a flight is cancelled or there is a problem with one of the aircraft.

Consumers rate Delta Airlines

“My dad and I had the unfortunate experience of missing a family wedding due to the cancellation of my flight to Johannesburg, South Africa on Saturday, March 16th,” writes Selwyn, of Dallas.

It happened, he says, because of a maintenance problem that took a long time to repair. By the time it was fixed, the flight crew was at the end of its work time limit. Once the plane was ready to fly, there was no crew to fly it.

“You would think that Delta would have a contingency plan with having a standby crew in place or switching the plane,” Selwyn writes.

Dream on. When airlines are trying to squeeze as much profitability out of every flight as they can, they don't have back-up crews sitting around.

A very red eye

Nancy, of Whittier, Calif., booked her parents on a JetBlue red-eye from Long Beach to Washington, D.C. At check-in they were told the flight was on time.

Consumers rate Jetblue

“We ended up waiting over five hours at the airport for our plane to arrive,” Nancy writes. It left at three a.m. and had to make a stop in Vegas. It arrived in Dulles at 10 a.m. The online system and phone automated system both showed incorrectly that the flight was on time. I spoke to a JetBlue operator, and I was told it was caused by the airport in Long Beach shutting down the long runway due to construction. I told her if this was the case, then JetBlue should have known well ahead of time that there would be an issue. I asked why Jet Blue didn't inform their passengers. She said she didn't know.”

This is not to say that flights don't arrive and depart on time and many passengers are relatively pleased with the service they receive. But you can also be sure there are also more than the three quoted here who find air travel an increasingly frustrating and stressful experience.

Since the depths of the post-9/11 recession, the U.S. airline industry has staged a strong comeback. Mergers and the discovery that passengers could be cha...

Article Image

Tarmac delays at a minimum in January

Airlines continue to do a good job of keeping long tarmac delays at a minimum.

According to the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT), carriers reported just two tarmac delays of more than three hours on domestic flights, but no tarmac delays of more than four hours on international flights during January.

The long domestic tarmac delays took place on January 27 -- one on a flight departing Chicago O’Hare Airport and the other on a flight diverted to Bullhead City, Ariz. DOT is investigating both.

The larger U.S. airlines have been required to file complete reports on their long tarmac delays for domestic flights since October 2008. Under a rule that took effect Aug. 23, 2011, all U.S. and foreign airlines operating at least one aircraft with 30 or more passenger seats must report lengthy tarmac delays at U.S. airports.

Also beginning Aug. 23, 2011, carriers operating international flights may not allow tarmac delays at U.S. airports to last longer than four hours without giving passengers an opportunity to deplane. Exceptions to the time limits for both domestic and international flights are allowed only for safety, security, or air traffic control-related reasons.

Other areas covered by the report include:

On-time performance

  • The reporting carriers posted an on-time arrival rate of 81.0% in January, compared with January 2012’s 83.7% mark and December 2012’s 76.6%.

Cancellations

  • The reporting carriers canceled 1.5% of their scheduled domestic flights in January, the same as January 2012, and down 0.1% from the rate in December 2012.

Chronically delayed flights

  • At the end of January, there were 12 flights that were chronically delayed -- more than 30 minutes late more than 50% of the time -- for two consecutive months. There were no chronically delayed flights for three consecutive months or more.

Causes of Flight Delays

  • In January, the carriers reported that 5.73% of their flights were delayed by aviation system delays, compared with 6.19% in December; 6.02% by late-arriving aircraft, versus 8.55% in December; 4.98% by factors within the airline’s control, such as maintenance or crew problems, compared with 6.21% in December; 0.55% by extreme weather, versus 0.59% in December; and 0.04% for security reasons, compared with 0.05% in December. Weather is a factor in both the extreme-weather category and the aviation-system category. This includes delays due to the re-routing of flights by DOT’s Federal Aviation Administration in consultation with the carriers involved. Weather is also a factor in delays attributed to late-arriving aircraft, although airlines do not report specific causes in that category.
  • Data collected by the Bureau of Transportation Statistics also shows the percentage of late flights delayed by weather, including those reported in either the category of extreme weather or included in National Aviation System delays. In January, 34.12% of late flights were delayed by weather, down 3.78% from January 2012, when 35.46% of late flights were delayed by weather, and up 3.99% from December when 32.81% of late flights were delayed by weather.

Mishandled baggage

  • The carriers posted a mishandled baggage rate of 3.41 reports per 1,000 passengers in January, compared with January 2012’s rate of 3.30 and December 2012’s rate of 4.15.

Incidents involving pets

  • In January, carriers reported three incidents involving the loss, death or injury of pets while traveling by air. In January 2012, there were eight reports, five reports were filed in December 2012. January’s incidents involved three pet deaths.

Complaints about airline service

  • In January, DOT received 1,368 complaints about airline service from consumers, up 46.3% from the 935 complaints filed in January 2012, and up 51.8% from the 901 received in December 2012.

Complaints about treatment of disabled passengers

  • The report also contains a tabulation of complaints filed with DOT in January against airlines regarding the treatment of passengers with disabilities. There was a total of 56 disability-related complaints in January, compared with 41 complaints in January 2012 and 35 in December 2012.

Complaints about discrimination

  • In January, there were six complaints alleging discrimination by airlines due to factors other than disability -- such as race, religion, national origin or sex --- four fewer than in January 2012, but three more than December 2012.

Consumers may file their complaints in writing with the Aviation Consumer Protection Division, U.S. Department of Transportation, C-75, W96-432, 1200 New Jersey Ave. SE, Washington, DC 20590; by voice mail at (202) 366-2220 or by TTY at (202) 366-0511; or on the Web .

Airlines continue to do a good job of keeping long tarmac delays at a minimum. According to the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT), carriers reported...

Article Image

More airports to offer Pre-Check

Flying around the country -- or at least getting on the plane -- is about to get easier for some travelers.

The Transportation Security Administration (TSA) says five more airports will offer Pre-Check, bringing the total number of airports participating to 40.

By April 1, 2013, eligible passengers flying on participating airlines out of Austin-Bergstrom International (AUS), Cleveland Hopkins International (CLE), Memphis International (MEM), Nashville International (BNA) and Raleigh-Durham International (RDU) airports may receive Pre-Check benefits.

Select passengers traveling on Alaska Airlines, American Airlines, Delta Air Lines, United Airlines and US Airways are eligible to participate in expedited screening at available locations. To date, more than 6.5 million passengers have experienced Pre-Check which allows passengers to leave on their shoes, light outerwear and belt, keep their laptop in its case and their 3-1-1 compliant liquids/gels bag in a carry-on.

“Offering Pre-Check at five additional airports is a key step to including more low risk travelers in the expedited screening process,” said TSA Administrator John S. Pistole. “This pre-screening initiative helps TSA focus its resources on those individuals we know less about, and strengthens our capabilities to ensure security for travelers when they fly.”

Who's eligible?

Eligible passengers include U.S. citizens who have opted-in through Alaska Airlines, American Airlines, Delta Air Lines, United Airlines and US Airways as well as those who are members of U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) Trusted Traveler programs, including Global Entry, SENTRI and NEXUS.

Canadian citizens traveling domestically in the United States who are members of NEXUS are also qualified to participate in Pre-Check. Individuals interested in joining a CBP Trusted Traveler program can learn more here.

Passengers 12 and younger are allowed through Pre-Check lanes with eligible passengers. Additionally, U.S. military active duty members may also participate when traveling through Charlotte Douglas International, Denver International Airport, Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta International, Honolulu International, Ronald Reagan Washington National, Seattle-Tacoma International and Washington Dulles International airports.

TSA anticipates expanding these military benefits to Baltimore/Washington International Thurgood Marshall and Lambert-St. Louis International airports when operationally ready.

How it works

If TSA determines a passenger is eligible for Pre-Check, information is embedded in the barcode of the passenger’s boarding pass. TSA scans the boarding pass at the designated Pre-Check lane where the passenger may experience the expedited screening process.

TSA incorporates random and unpredictable security measures throughout the airport and no individual is guaranteed expedited screening. TSA’s multi-layered approach to security also includes behavior detection officers, explosives-detection systems, canine teams, and federal air marshals -- among other measures -- both seen and unseen.

Flying around the country -- or at least getting on the plane -- is about to get easier for some travelers. The Transportation Security Administration (T...

Article Image

American Airlines, US Airways to merge, forming world's largest carrier

It's a done deal -- almost.

The boards of American Airlines parent AMR and US Airways have given their blessing to a merger that they say will create “a premier global carrier.” The value of the deal, which must jump through a variety of federal regulatory hoops, is put at approximately $11 billion based on the price of US Airways' stock as of February 13.

Initially, the newly-created carrier will operate under the American Airlines and will -- according to a joint press release -- give customers “access to more choices and increased service across the combined company's larger worldwide network.”

"Today, we are proud to launch the new American Airlines -- a premier global carrier well equipped to compete and win against the best in the world," said Tom Horton, chairman, president, and CEO of American Airlines. "Together, we will be even better positioned to deliver for all of our stakeholders, including our customers, people, investors, partners, and the many communities we serve.”

US Airways Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Doug Parker, calls it “an exciting new chapter” for both carriers. “The combined airline,” he said, “will have the scale, breadth and capabilities to compete more effectively and profitably in the global marketplace. Our combined network will provide a significantly more attractive offering to customers, ensuring that we are always able to take them where they want to travel, when they want to go."

What about consumers?

The Association for Airline Passenger Rights worries that fewer airlines means less competition and higher fares…and fees. The group says if the merger is allowed to proceed, passengers stand to lose because they will have fewer choices, less competitive fares, and service to smaller airports will likely dwindle.

“You don’t have to be an economics professor to understand that less competition in the market is going to result in consumers paying more, and airfares are certainly not immune from this simple fact,” said Brandon M. Macsata, the group's executive director. “In fact, since a couple of the legacy airlines were lost to mergers we’ve not only seen an increase in airfares over the last seven years, they have been accompanied by ballooning fees for everything ranging from baggage, change-of-flight to seat selection.”

Here to there

The combined airline will offer more than 6,700 daily flights to 336 destinations in 56 countries and is expected to maintain all hubs currently served by American and US Airways, which the companies say will result in more travel options for customers.

Both airlines expect that the regional carriers they own -- AMR Corporation's American Eagle and US Airways' Piedmont and PSA -- will continue to operate as distinct entities, providing seamless service to the combined airline.

Completing the deal

The merger is conditioned on the approval by the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York, regulatory approvals, approval by US Airways shareholders, other customary closing conditions, and confirmation and consummation of the Plan. The combination is expected to be completed in the third quarter of this year.   

It's a done deal -- almost. The boards of American Airlines parent AMR and US Airways have given their blessing to a merger that they say will create “a p...

Article Image

There's now a pretty good chance that your airline baggage will end up where you are

More suitcases are showing up at the same airports as their owners

According to the the U.S. Transportation Department's (DOT) Air Travel Consumer Report, the nation’s largest airlines had their lowest rate of mishandled baggage for a year during 2012. The carriers also set high marks for on-time performance, the fewest long tarmac delays and a low rate of canceled flights.

The reporting carriers posted a rate of 3.09 reports of mishandled baggage per 1,000 passengers -- an improvement on 2011’s rate of 3.35 and their lowest rate of mishandled baggage for a year since these data were first reported in September 1987.

Improved on-time performance

The 15 largest U.S. airlines also posted an 81.85 percent on-time arrival rate during 2012, the third highest annual performance in the 18 years DOT has collected comparable data. The high was 82.14 percent in 2002, followed by 81.96 in 2003. The 1.29 percent cancellation rate for the year also was the second lowest rate for the past 18 years, with the lowest being the 1.24 percent mark set in 2002.

In addition, there were 42 tarmac delays longer than three hours on U.S. domestic flights in 2012 – eight fewer than in 2011, which was the first full year the rule limiting tarmac delays was in effect. This follows the DOT rule, which took effect in April 2010, setting a three-hour limit for aircraft carrying passengers on domestic flights to sit on the tarmac. Exceptions to the time limits are allowed only for safety, security or air traffic control-related reasons.

Between May 2009 and April 2010, the final 12 months before the rule took effect, the carriers reported 693 tarmac delays of more than three hours. Since August 2011, U.S. and foreign airlines operating international flights at U.S. airports have been subject to a four-hour tarmac delay limit.

“This remarkable decrease in flight delays, tarmac incidents, cancellations and mishandled bags is a tribute both to the hard work of the airlines and the Department of Transportation’s oversight of the aviation industry,” said U.S. Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood. “We will continue to work with the carriers to make air travel more convenient and hassle-free for consumers.”

December data

The monthly Air Travel Consumer Report for December also includes the following data:

On-time performance

  • The reporting carriers posted an on-time arrival rate in December of 76.6 percent, compared with December 2011’s 84.4 percent mark and November 2012’s 85.7 percent.

Tarmac delays

  • Airlines reported 16 tarmac delays of more than three hours on domestic flights and one tarmac delay of more than four hours on international flights in December. Fourteen of the domestic tarmac delays took place on Dec. 25 at Dallas-Fort Worth International Airport where a snow and ice storm affected the area that day.

Cancellations

  • The reporting carriers canceled 1.6 percent of their scheduled domestic flights in December. In December of 2011, the cancellation rate was 0,8 percent and November 2012’s cancellation rate was 1.0 percent.

Chronically delayed flights

  • At the end of December, there was one flight that was chronically delayed -- more than 30 minutes late more than 50 percent of the time -- for two consecutive months. No flights were chronically delayed for three consecutive months or more.

Causes of flight delays

  • In December, the carriers filing on-time performance data reported that 6.19 percent of their flights were delayed by aviation system delays, compared with 3.68 percent in November; 8.55 percent by late-arriving aircraft, versus 4.89 percent in November; 6.21 percent by factors within the airline’s control, such as maintenance or crew problems, compared with 4.27 percent in November; 0.59 percent by extreme weather, as opposed to 0.22 percent in November; and 0.05 percent for security reasons, versus 0.02 percent in November. Weather is a factor in both the extreme-weather category and the aviation-system category. This includes delays due to the re-routing of flights by the Federal Aviation Administration in consultation with the carriers involved. Weather is also a factor in delays attributed to late-arriving aircraft, although airlines do not report specific causes in that category.
  • Data collected by BTS also show the percentage of late flights delayed by weather, including those reported in either the category of extreme weather or included in National Aviation System delays. In December, 32.81 percent of late flights were delayed by weather, down 5.17 percent from December 2011, when 34.60 percent of late flights were delayed by weather, and up 29.43 percent from November when 25.35 percent of late flights were delayed by weather.

Mishandled baggage

  • The U.S. carriers posted a mishandled baggage rate of 4.15 reports per 1,000 passengers in December, compared with December 2011’s rate of 3.22 and November 2012’s rate of 2.64.

Bumping

  • The report also includes airline reports of involuntary denied boarding, or bumping, for calendar year 2012 and the fourth quarter of last year. The carriers posted a bumping rate of 0.99 per 10,000 passengers last year, versus the 0.77 rate posted in 2011. For the fourth quarter of last year, the carriers posted a bumping rate of 1.00 per 10,000 passengers; the rate was 0.65 for the fourth quarter of 2011.

Incidents involving pets

  • In December, carriers reported five incidents involving the loss, death or injury of pets while traveling by air the same as in December 2011. There was one report in November 2012. December’s incidents involved one pet death and four pet injuries. For all of last year, carriers reported 30 pet deaths, 27 pet injuries, and one lost pet. In 2011, carriers reported 35 pet deaths, nine pet injuries, and two lost pets.

Complaints about airline service

  • In December, DOT received 901 complaints about airline service from consumers, up 26.7 percent from the 711 complaints received in December 2011, and down 8.7 percent from the total of 987 filed in November 2012. For all of last year, there were15,335 complaints, 32.8 percent more than the 11,546 complaints received in 2011.

Complaints about treatment of disabled passengers

  • The report also contains a tabulation of complaints filed with DOT in December against airlines regarding the treatment of passengers with disabilities. There was a total of 35 disability-related complaints in December 2012, compared with 59 disability in December 2011 and 55 in November 2012. For all of last year, DOT received 743 disability complaints, up 18.3 percent from the total of 628 received in 2011.

Complaints about discrimination

  • In December, there were three complaints alleging discrimination by airlines due to factors other than disability -- such as race, religion, national origin or sex – compared with down a total of seven filed in both December 2011 and in November 2012. For all of last year, the DOT received 99 discrimination complaints, down 22.7 percent from the total of 128 filed in 2011.

Consumers may file their complaints in writing with the Aviation Consumer Protection Division, U.S. Department of Transportation, C-75, W96-432, 1200 New Jersey Ave. SE, Washington, DC 20590; by voice mail at (202) 366-2220 or by TTY at (202) 366-0511; or on the Web.

According to the the U.S. Transportation Department's (DOT) Air Travel Consumer Report, the nation’s largest airlines had their lowest rate of mishandled b...

Article Image

United fined for violating tarmac delay rule

United Air Lines has been fined $130,000 for violating federal rules last May by not informing passengers on an aircraft delayed at Chicago’s O’Hare International Airport that they had an opportunity to leave the plane as it sat at the gate with the door open.

According to the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT), United violated a provision of its airline consumer protection rule requiring that if passengers on a delayed flight have the opportunity to leave the aircraft, the carrier must inform them that they can deplane. Announcements that passengers can leave the plane must be made 30 minutes after the scheduled departure time and every 30 minutes afterward.

“It’s very simple -- if a plane is delayed at the gate and it’s possible for passengers to leave, the airline must tell them of their rights,” said U.S. Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood. “We adopted our tarmac delay rules to protect passengers’ rights and will continue to take enforcement action when necessary.”

Failure to notify

United Flight 881 was scheduled to fly from O’Hare to Tokyo’s Narita International Airport on May 7, 2012. The aircraft was pushed back at 12:38 p.m. but returned to a gate at 2:25 for maintenance, at which time the doors were opened. However, United failed to make an announcement notifying passengers of that opportunity to leave the plane as required by DOT’s rules.

The aircraft doors were closed again at 3:10, but because of another mechanical problem the flight was canceled and passengers deplaned at 5:22 p.m. Three passengers on board the flight filed complaints with the Department’s Aviation Consumer Protection Division regarding the delay.   

United Air Lines has been fined $130,000 for violating federal rules last May by not informing passengers on an aircraft delayed at Chicago’s O’Hare Intern...

Article Image

Sky King fined for charter violations

Air carrier Sky King has been assessed a $500,000 penalty for violating rules that protect passengers when their public charter flights are suddenly canceled. The airline was also ordered to cease and desist from further violations.

Sky King was one of several carriers operating flights for Direct Air, a charter operator also known as Myrtle Beach Direct Air & Tours, which ceased operating in March 2012. Direct Air arranged charters from a number of cities in the Midwest and Northeast to Myrtle Beach, SC, and cities in Florida.

Public charters differ from scheduled flights in that they operate only for a specific time period and are usually sold by a charter operator rather than an airline. The U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) has specific rules applying to public charters, including a requirement that the charter operator have a financial security arrangement, such as a bond or letter of credit and an escrow account to protect consumers’ money if a flight is canceled. There is also a ban on canceling flights less than 10 days before departure unless it is physically impossible to operate the flight.

“Airline passengers should be able to book charter flights with the confidence that they will be returned home on time,” said Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood. “DOT will continue to protect the rights of airline consumers and take enforcement action against airlines and charter operators when those rights are violated.”

Funding shortfall

Beginning with flights departing in January 2012, Direct Air failed to transfer sufficient funds from its escrow account to Sky King prior to the operation of the charter flights. However, Sky King continued to operate the charter flights without requiring full payment of the total charter price from Direct Air, in violation of DOT rules.

On March 13, 2012, Sky King ceased all flights under the public charter program, as Direct Air owed money to Sky King for flights the carrier had completed on its behalf. Numerous passengers did not receive the service for which they paid Direct Air when Sky King canceled the remaining flights it was scheduled to operate for Direct Air.

In assessing its fine against Sky King, DOT found the carrier violated rules requiring that it be paid prior to operating a public charter flight and prohibiting the cancellation of public charter flights less than 10 days before their scheduled departure.

Passengers left high and dry

In addition, Sky King failed to ensure return flights for all round-trip passengers who traveled on the carrier for the outbound leg of their trips. Carriers also are required to make a reasonable effort to ensure that the charter operator for which they are providing flights is complying with the public charter rules. The Enforcement Office noted that the late payments should have prompted Sky King to look into whether Direct Air was following the rules.

This is the fourth and largest penalty assessed by DOT related to the Direct Air program. The penalty amount will be included in DOT’s proof of claim that will be filed in Sky King’s bankruptcy case. The Department is continuing to investigate Direct Air’s shutdown.  

Air carrier Sky King has been assessed a $500,000 penalty for violating rules that protect passengers when their public charter flights are suddenly cancel...

Article Image

Two airlines fined for tarmac delay violations

Copa Airlines of Panama and Virgin America have been slapped with thousands of dollars in fines for violating federal rules that limit how long an aircraft with passengers aboard may be delayed on the tarmac. As it fined Copa $150,000 and Virgin America $55,000. the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) ordered the carriers to cease and desist from further violations.

The Copa and Virgin America orders were the final enforcement actions taken last year by the Department’s Aviation Enforcement Office. During 2012, the DOT issued 49 consent orders for consumer rule violations and assessed $3,610,000 in fines -- exceeding the previous record of 47 orders and $3,264,000 in fines issued in 2011.

“This administration believes that consumers have the right to be treated fairly when they fly,” said Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood. “Our tarmac rules are meant to prevent passengers from being trapped in aircraft on the ground for hours on end, and we will continue to work with airlines and airports to make sure that air travelers are treated with the respect they deserve before, during and after their flights.”

Unseemly delays

Airlines may not allow tarmac delays longer than three hours on domestic flights and four hours on international flights at U.S. airports without giving passengers an opportunity to leave the plane. Exceptions to the time limits are allowed only for safety, security, or air traffic control-related reasons.

In addition, if a flight is delayed at the gate and passengers are able to leave the plane, the carrier must announce the opportunity to deplane 30 minutes after the scheduled departure time and every 30 minutes afterward.

Copa violation

DOT found that Copa left passengers stranded aboard an aircraft at New York’s JFK Airport for five hours and 34 minutes on June 22, 2012, on a flight bound for Panama. Passengers were not offered food until more than four hours into the delay, although DOT rules call for airlines to provide food and drinking water no later than two hours after leaving the gate. Copa also failed to report the tarmac delay as required. DOT found out about the delay only after two consumers filed complaints.

In addition, Copa’s contingency plan for tarmac delays, posted on its Website, failed to include a number of assurances required by DOT rules, including that it would notify passengers during a delay at the gate if they may leave the aircraft, maintain sufficient resources to implement its contingency plan, and coordinate its plan with airport authorities and other U.S. government agencies at airports the carrier serves.

Virgin America violation

Virgin America was fined for failing to notify passengers in an aircraft delayed at the gate for two hours and 16 minutes at Chicago’s O’Hare Airport on July 18, 2012, that they could leave the aircraft prior to its departure for San Francisco.

Passengers may file complaints or comments about airline service not related to safety or security issues here.  

Copa Airlines of Panama and Virgin America have been slapped with thousands of dollars in fines for violating federal rules that limit how long an aircraft...

Article Image

Airlines Report No Excruciatingly Long Tarmac Delays in September

Getting off the ground and on your way to your destination is getting better.

According to the U.S. Department of Transportation’s (DOT) Air Travel Consumer Report, airlines reported no tarmac delays of more than three hours on domestic flights or more than four hours on international flights in September.

The larger U.S. airlines have been required to file complete reports on their long tarmac delays for domestic flights since October 2008. Under a new rule that took effect Aug. 23, 2011, all U.S. and foreign airlines operating at least one aircraft with 30 or more passenger seats must report lengthy tarmac delays at U.S. airports.

Also beginning Aug. 23, 2011, carriers operating international flights may not allow tarmac delays at U.S. airports to last longer than four hours without giving passengers an opportunity to deplane. There is a separate three-hour limit on tarmac delays involving domestic flights, which went into effect in April 2010.

Exceptions to the time limits for both domestic and international flights are allowed only for safety, security, or air traffic control-related reasons. Severe weather could cause or exacerbate such situations.

On-time performance

The reporting carriers posted an on-time arrival rate of 83.3 percent in September -- down from September 2011’s 83.9 percent mark, but up from August 2012’s 79.1 percent.

Cancellations

The reporting carriers canceled 0.8 percent of their scheduled domestic flights in September, the same as the rate posted in September 2011, but down from August 2012’s cancellation rate of 1.3 percent.

Chronically delayed flights

At the end of September, there were 24 flights that were chronically delayed -- more than 30 minutes late more than 50 percent of the time -- for three consecutive months. There were an additional 14 flights that were chronically delayed for two consecutive months. There were no chronically delayed flights for four consecutive months or more.

Causes of flight delays

In September, the carriers filing on-time performance data reported that 4.98 percent of their flights were delayed by aviation system delays, compared with 5.26 percent in August; 5.72 percent by late-arriving aircraft, versus 7.68 percent in August; 4.65 percent by factors within the airline’s control, such as maintenance or crew problems, compared with 5.79 percent in August; 0.34 percent by extreme weather, as opposed to 0.53 percent in August; and 0.03 percent for security reasons, compared with 0.04 percent in August.

Weather is a factor in both the extreme-weather category and the aviation-system category. This includes delays due to the re-routing of flights by the Federal Aviation Administration in consultation with the carriers involved. Weather is also a factor in delays attributed to late-arriving aircraft, although airlines do not report specific causes in that category.

Data collected by the Bureau of Transportation Statistics (BTS) also shows the percentage of late flights delayed by weather, including those reported in either the category of extreme weather or included in National Aviation System delays. In September, 27.66 percent of late flights were delayed by weather, compared with September 2011, when 36.15 percent of late flights were delayed by weather, and August when 32.95 percent of late flights were delayed by weather.

Mishandled baggage

The U.S. carriers reporting flight delays and mishandled baggage data posted a mishandled baggage rate of 2.7 reports per 1,000 passengers in September, compared with September 2011’s rate of 2.8 and August 2012’s rate of 3.4. For the first nine months of this year, the carriers posted a mishandled baggage rate of 3.06 reports per 1,000 passengers, versus the 3.51 rate recorded during the first nine months of 2011.

Bumping

The report also includes reports of involuntary denied boarding, or bumping, for the third quarter and first nine months of this year. Carriers posted a bumping rate of 0.98 per 10,000 passengers for the quarter, up from the 0.71 rate for the third quarter of 2011. For the first nine months of this year, the carriers had a bumping rate of 0.98 per 10,000 passengers, up from the rate of 0.77 posted during the first nine months of 2011.

Incidents involving pets

In September, carriers reported two incidents involving the loss, death or injury of pets while traveling by air. There were three reports filed in September 2011 and the five reports filed in August 2012. September’s incidents involved one pet death and one pet injury.

Complaints about airline service

In September, there were 1,075 complaints about airline service from consumers, up 10.5 percent from the 973 complaints filed in September 2011, but down 43.0 percent from the 1,886 received in August 2012. For the first nine months of this year, there were 12,145 consumer complaints, up 33.5 percent from the total of 9,096 filed during the first nine months of 2011.

Complaints about treatment of disabled passengers

The report also contains a tabulation of complaints filed with DOT in September against airlines regarding the treatment of passengers with disabilities. There were 73 disability-related complaints in September, compared with 54 complaints filed in September 2011 and equal to the total received in August 2012. For the first nine months of this year, there were 590 disability-related complaints, up 27.7 percent from the total of 462 filed during the first nine months of 2011.

Complaints about discrimination

In September, DOT received seven complaints alleging discrimination by airlines due to factors other than disability -- such as race, religion, national origin or sex -- down nine from the total recorded in September 2011 two from the number recorded in August 2012. For the first nine months of this year, the Department received 82 complaints about discrimination, down 15.5 percent from the total of 97 filed during the first nine months of 2011.

Consumers may file their complaints in writing with the Aviation Consumer Protection Division, U.S. Department of Transportation, C-75, W96-432, 1200 New Jersey Ave. SE, Washington, DC 20590; by voice mail at (202) 366-2220 or by TTY at (202) 366-0511; or on the Web.

Getting off the ground and on your way to your destination is getting better. Accordig to the U.S. Department of Transportation’s Air Travel Consumer Rep...

Article Image

Airlines Get a Handle on Domestic Tarmac Delays in August

August was a good month for airlines in terms of getting their passengers off the ground in decent fashion.

According to the U.S. Department of Transportation's (DOT) Air Travel Consumer Report, there were no tarmac delays of more than three hours on domestic flights and only one tarmac delay of more than four hours on international flights

The one international tarmac delay -- an Aug. 15 flight by Caribbean Airlines from New York's JFK Airport to Port of Spain, Trinidad and Tobago that was delayed on the tarmac for four hours, 28 minutes prior to takeoff -- is under investigation by DOT.

The larger U.S. airlines have been required to file complete reports on their long tarmac delays for domestic flights since October 2008. Under a new rule that took effect Aug. 23, 2011, all U.S. and foreign airlines operating at least one aircraft with 30 or more passenger seats must report lengthy tarmac delays at U.S. airports.

Also beginning Aug. 23, 2011, carriers operating international flights may not allow tarmac delays at U.S. airports to last longer than four hours. There is a separate three-hour limit on tarmac delays involving domestic flights, which went into effect in April 2010. Exceptions to the time limits for both domestic and international flights are allowed only for safety, security, or air traffic control-related reasons. Severe weather could cause or worsen such situations.

Other areas covered by the report include:

On-time performance

  • The reporting carriers posted an on-time arrival rate of 79.1 percent in August, versus August 2011's 79.3 percent mark and July 2012's 76.0 percent.

Cancellations

  • The reporting carriers canceled 1.3 percent of their scheduled domestic flights in August. The cancellation rate was 2.5 percent in August 2011 and 1.4 percent in July 2012.

Chronically delayed flights

  • At the end of August, there were 56 flights that were chronically delayed -- more than 30 minutes late more than 50 percent of the time -- for two consecutive months. There were no chronically delayed flights for three consecutive months or more.

Causes of flight delays

  • In August, the carriers filing on-time performance data reported that 5.26 percent of their flights were delayed by aviation system delays, compared with 6.07 percent in July; 7.68 percent by late-arriving aircraft, versus 9.03 percent in July; 5.79 percent by factors within the airline's control -- such as maintenance or crew problems -- compared with 6.32 percent in July; 0.53 percent by extreme weather, compared with 0.82 percent in July; and 0.04 percent for security reasons -- the same as in July. Weather is a factor in both the extreme-weather category and the aviation-system category. This includes delays due to the re-routing of flights by the Federal Aviation Administration in consultation with the carriers involved. Weather is also a factor in delays attributed to late-arriving aircraft, although airlines do not report specific causes in that category.
  • Data collected by the Bureau of Transportation Statistics also shows the percentage of late flights delayed by weather, including those reported in either the category of extreme weather or included in National Aviation System delays. In August, 32.95 percent of late flights were delayed by weather, down 16.52 percent from August 2011, when 39.47 percent of late flights were delayed by weather, and down 19.06 percent from July when 40.71 percent of late flights were delayed by weather.

Mishandled baggage

  • The U.S. carriers reporting flight delays and mishandled baggage data posted a mishandled baggage rate of 3.38 reports per 1,000 passengers in August, compared with August 2011's rate of 3.45  and July 2012's rate of 3.52 .

Incidents involving pets

  • In August, carriers reported five incidents involving the loss, death, or injury of pets while traveling by air, equal to the the five reports filed in August 2011, but up from the three reports filed in July 2012. August's incidents involved three pet deaths and two pet injuries.

Complaints about airline service

  • In August, the DOT received 1,886 complaints about airline service from consumers, up 33.2 percent from the 1,416 complaints filed in August 2011, but down 23.5 percent from the 2,466 received in July 2012.

Complaints about treatment of disabled passengers

  • The report also contains a tabulation of complaints filed with DOT in August against airlines regarding the treatment of passengers with disabilities. The Department received a total of 73 disability-related complaints in August, up from the total of 48 complaints filed in August 2011, but down from the total of 97 complaints received in July 2012.

Complaints about discrimination

  • In August, the Department received nine complaints alleging discrimination by airlines due to factors other than disability -- such as race, religion, national origin or sex. There were 12 in August 2011 and 16 in July 2012.

Consumers may file their complaints in writing with the Aviation Consumer Protection Division, U.S. Department of Transportation, C-75, W96-432, 1200 New Jersey Ave. SE, Washington, DC 20590; by voice mail at (202) 366-2220 or by TTY at (202) 366-0511; or on the Web.

August was a good month for airlines in terms of getting their passengers off the ground in decent fashion. According to the U.S. Department of Transporta...

Article Image

Spirit's Last-Minute Carry-On Fee More Than Doubles

Spirit Airlines is the low-fare carrier that makes up for its cheap tickets with numerous fees. If you can avoid the fees flying can be cheap.

The airline has posted a new fee schedule effective Nov. 6 that Spirit customers should get familiar with, especially if they are in the habit of paying for a carry-on bag at the gate. Starting Nov. 6 that fee jumps from $45 to $100.

Spirit's numerous fees are often a sore spot with travelers who look only at the published fares. Sandra, of Staten Island, NY, is a good example.

“Our family of three flew to vacation via Spirit Airlines, which seemed to be the most affordable offer,” Sandra wrote in a ConsumerAffairs post. “We had one hand luggage each, which we thought should be carried for free, but when we reached the gate, our hand luggage was 2 inches over-sized. We had to pay $40 for each piece, for a total of $120! This was a vacation expense we didn't count on.”

No apologies

Spirit makes no apologies for its fees, pointing out that travelers who can avoid them are getting a very good value.

“We empower customers to save money on air travel by offering ultra low base fares with a range of optional services for a fee, allowing customers the freedom to choose only the extras they value,” the airline says on its Website.

With that in mind, it might be good for consumers to familiarize themselves with Spirit's fee schedule, with special emphasis on the ones that are going up next month.

The sooner you pay the lower the fee

With Spirit, the sooner you pay the fee the less it is. For example, if you pay when you purchase your ticket online but before you check in, the carry-on bag fee is currently $30. Nov. 6 it goes up to $35. The first checked bag fee, purchased online before check in, is currently $28 but is going up to $30.

If you wait to pay for a carry-on bag at check in, the fee is $35 but is rising to $40. The longer you wait to pay the fee, the more it is.

Purchasing at the airport counter, for example, costs $40 for a carry-on, but is going up to $50 -- a 25 percent increase. The first checked bag is going from $38 to $45 and the second checked bag is rising from $45 to $55.

In addition to baggage fees there are also seating fees, booking fees, overweight baggage fees, sporting equipment fees and special service fees. Travelers who look only at the published fares and not at the fee schedule might be in for a rude shock.

Spirit Airlines is the low-fare carrier that makes up for its cheap tickets with numerous fees. If you can avoid the fees flying can be cheap.The airline...

Article Image

Xtra Airways Fined for Charter Violations

Xtra Airways has been fined $300,000 for violating rules protecting passengers when their public charter flights were suddenly canceled. At the same time it levied the fines, the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) ordered the carrier to cease and desist from further violations. 

Xtra was one of several carriers operating flights for Direct Air, a charter operator also known as Myrtle Beach Direct Air & Tours, which ceased operating in March. Direct Air arranged charters from a number of cities in the Midwest and Northeast to Myrtle Beach, SC, and cities in Florida. 

Charter rules 

Public charters differ from scheduled flights in that they operate only for a specific time period and are usually sold by a charter operator rather than an airline. DOT has specific rules applying to public charters, including a requirement that the charter operator have a security arrangement, such as a bond or letter of credit and an escrow account to protect consumers’ money if a flight is canceled, and a ban on canceling flights less than 10 days before departure unless it is physically impossible to operate the flight. 

“Airline passengers should not have to worry about last-minute charter flight cancellations or being stranded in the middle of their trips,” said U.S. Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood. “Our rules were put into place to protect passengers’ rights, and we will continue to take enforcement action against airlines and charter operators when they violate those rules.” 

Flights canceled 

Xtra Airways stopped flying charters for Direct Air on March 13, 2012, after Direct Air failed to pay the carrier all the money it was owed for operating flights that departed on or after March 3. Payments for several flights prior to March 3 were also late. 

Many passengers did not receive the service they paid Direct Air for when Xtra Airways canceled the remaining flights it was scheduled to operate for Direct Air. 

In issuing its fine against Xtra Airways, the Department’s Aviation Enforcement Office said the carrier violated rules requiring that it be paid prior to operating a public charter flight and prohibiting the cancellation of such flights less than 10 days before their scheduled departure. In addition, the carrier providing the transportation is required to ensure return flights for all round-trip passengers who have flown the outbound leg of their trip. 

Carriers also are required to make a reasonable effort to ensure that the charter operator for which they are providing flights is complying with the public charter rules. The Enforcement Office noted that the late payments should have prompted Xtra Airways to look into whether Direct Air was following the rules. 

This is the second penalty issued by the DOT related to Direct Air. On July 27, the Department assessed a $180,000 penalty against World Atlantic Airlines https://www.consumeraffairs.com/news04/2012/07/direct-air-shutdown-draws-fine-for-world-atlantic-airlines.html , another carrier operating flights for Direct Air.

The shutdown of Direct Air remains under investigation.

Xtra Airways has been fined $300,000 for violating rules protecting passengers when their public charter flights were suddenly canceled. At the same time i...

Article Image

Missing iPad Tracked to TSA Agent's Home

The Case of the Missing iPad is turning into a major embarassment for the Transportation Security Administration (TSA). It's the latest apparent case in hundreds of thefts by TSA officers of passenger belongings.

It involves an iPad left behind at a security checkpoint in the Orlando airport that was tracked as it moved 30 miles to the home of the TSA officer last seen handling it. Confronted two weeks later by ABC News, the TSA officer, Andy Ramirez, at first denied having the missing iPad, but ultimately turned it over after blaming his wife for taking it from the airport.

The iPad was one of ten purposely left behind at TSA checkpoints at major airports with a history of theft by government screeners, as part of an ABC News investigation into the TSA's ongoing problem with theft from passengers.

The full video report is being broadcast today on "Good Morning America," "ABC World News with Diane Sawyer" and "Nightline."

The TSA is already among the most unpopular agencies even, with a recent survey finding that 90 percent of frequent flyers think the agency is doing either a poor or a fair job of performing security screenings.  

An outrage

"This is the tip of the iceberg," said Rep. John Mica, (R.-Fla.), chair of the House Transportation Committee and a frequent critic of TSA senior management. "It is an outrage to the public, and actually to our aviation system."

The TSA said Ramirez was no longer with the agency as of Wednesday afternoon. In a statement to ABC News, the agency said it has "a zero-tolerance policy for theft and terminates any employee who is determined to have stolen from a passenger."

According to the TSA, 381 TSA officers have been fired for theft between 2003 and 2012.

The agency disputes that theft is a widespread problem, however, saying the number of officers fired "represents less than one-half of one percent of officers that have been employed" by TSA.

In the ABC News investigation, TSA officers at nine of the ten airport checkpoints followed agency guidelines and immediately contacted the owner, whose name and phone number were displayed prominently on the iPad case.

Luggage checked at the same airports with iPads and cash went through security undisturbed.

Tracking device

But in Orlando, the iPad was not immediately returned and two hours later its tracking application showed the device as it moved away from the airport to the home of the TSA officer.

After waiting 15 days, ABC News went to the home and asked Ramirez to return the iPad. He denied knowing anything about the missing iPad and said any items left behind at security checkpoints are taken to lost and found.

The Orlando airport lost and found said there was no record of an iPad being turned in on the day in question. 

Ramirez produced the iPad only after ABC News activated an audio alarm feature, and turned it over after taking off his TSA uniform shirt. His explanation for the missing iPad in his home was that his wife had taken it from the airport.

"I'm so embarrassed," he told ABC News. "My wife says she got the iPad and brought it home," he said.

Moments later, his wife appeared at the door to say she had found it and "no told my husband."

Asked how that was possible given that ABC News tape showed him handling the iPad at the security checkpoint, Ramirez shut the door and has not responded to questions since.

No TSA official, including director John Pistole, would agree to be interviewed by ABC News about the issue of theft and what steps TSA has taken to address the long-standing problem.

In its statement, the TSA said it "holds its employees to the highest ethical standards."

Congressman Mica says TSA management has failed to properly do background checks on the employees it hires as officers, and had earlier this year asked the Government Accountability Office to do a full investigation of TSA's theft problems. 

"[If] you're not vetting them before you put them on the job, and allow them to rummage through people's personal effects, there is something wrong," said Mica. 

 The Case of the Missing iPad is turning into a major embarassment for the Transportation Security Administration (TSA). It's the latest apparent ca...

Article Image

Pakistan International Airlines Fined for Tarmac Rule Violation

The U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) has fined Pakistan International Airlines (PIA) $150,000, saying the carrier violated federal rules last October by not providing passengers on an aircraft diverted to Washington Dulles Airport an opportunity to leave the plane before it was delayed on the tarmac for more than four hours. 

DOT also ordered the airline to cease and desist from further violations. 

First fine for international carrier 

This is the first fine for an international flight in violation of DOT’s new consumer protection rule, which took effect in August 2011, setting a four-hour limit for tarmac delays on international flights. 

While other lengthy tarmac delays that occurred on the same day are still under review, the PIA incident was the only one occurring at Dulles, which was not subject to the weather, equipment, infrastructure, and international arrival limitations that existed at other affected airports. 

“Passengers deserve to be treated with respect when they fly, and DOT’s tarmac delay rules were put into place to ensure that they receive that respect,” said U.S. Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood. “We take any violation seriously, and will continue to take enforcement action against airlines that fail to comply with these rules.” 

Rule violation 

Under DOT rules, foreign airlines operating aircraft, with 30 or more passenger seats, that fly to and from U.S. airports are prohibited from allowing their aircraft to remain on the tarmac for more than four hours at most U.S. airports without giving passengers an opportunity to leave the plane. 

Exceptions to the time limits are allowed only for safety, security, or air traffic control-related reasons. The rules require carriers to include the four-hour provision in their tarmac delay contingency plan commitments to passengers. 

PIA flight 711, traveling from England’s Manchester Airport to New York’s JFK Airport, was scheduled to arrive at JFK at 3:27 p.m. on Oct. 29, 2011, but diverted to Washington Dulles Airport due to interruptions in JFK’s Instrument Landing System equipment. After landing at Dulles at 4:28 p.m., the plane remained delayed on the tarmac for four hours and forty-seven minutes. 

Although the captain and first officer were able to deplane the aircraft safely via air stairs in order to conduct external safety inspections of the aircraft, airline officials believed that deplaning passengers by air stairs may have been unsuitable due to the inclement weather, as well as the number of passengers requiring wheelchairs and the number of small children on board. 

However, PIA made no other attempts to deplane passengers by any other means or to seek assistance from the airport operator in deplaning before the tarmac delay exceeded four hours, in violation of DOT rules.  

The U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) has fined Pakistan International Airlines (PIA) $150,000, saying the carrier violated federal rules last Octobe...

Article Image

Airlines Report Uptick in Lengthy Tarmac Delays in July

Airlines reported 18 tarmac delays of more than three hours on domestic flights and one tarmac delay of more than four hours on international flights in July, according to a new U.S. Department of Transportation’s (DOT) Air Travel Consumer Report. 

Sixteen of the long domestic tarmac delays took place on July 13 and involved flights bound for or departing from Chicago O’Hare Airport, where severe storms affected the area that day. DOT is investigating all of the reported tarmac delays. 

The larger U.S. airlines have been required to file complete reports on their long tarmac delays for domestic flights since October 2008. Under a new rule that took effect Aug. 23, 2011, all U.S. and foreign airlines operating at least one aircraft with 30 or more passenger seats must report lengthy tarmac delays at U.S. airports. 

Also beginning Aug. 23, 2011, carriers operating international flights may not allow tarmac delays at U.S. airports to last longer than four hours. There is a separate three-hour limit on tarmac delays involving domestic flights, which went into effect in April 2010. Exceptions to the time limits for both domestic and international flights are allowed only for safety, security, or air traffic control-related reasons. Severe weather could cause or worsen such situations. 

Among other areas covered by the report are: 

On-time performance 

  • The reporting carriers posted an on-time arrival rate in July of 76.0 percent, compared with July 2011’s 77.8 percent mark and June 2012’s 80.7 percent. 

Cancellations 

  • The reporting carriers canceled 1.4 percent of their scheduled domestic flights in July, versus the 1.7 percent cancellation rate posted in July 2011 June 2012’s cancellation rate of 1.1 percent. 

Chronically delayed flights 

  • At the end of July, there were four flights that were chronically delayed -- more than 30 minutes late more than 50 percent of the time -- for three consecutive months. There were 14 additional flights that were chronically delayed for two consecutive months. There were no chronically delayed flights for four consecutive months or more. 

Causes of flight delays 

  • In July, the carriers filing on-time performance data reported that 6.07 percent of their flights were delayed by aviation system delays, compared with 4.82 percent in June; 9.03 percent by late-arriving aircraft, versus 6.98 percent in June; 6.32 percent by factors within the airline’s control, such as maintenance or crew problems, compared with 5.62 percent in June; 0.82 percent by extreme weather, versus 0.50 percent in June; and 0.04 percent for security reasons, the same as in June. Weather is a factor in both the extreme-weather category and the aviation-system category. This includes delays due to the re-routing of flights by DOT’s Federal Aviation Administration in consultation with the carriers involved. Weather is also a factor in delays attributed to late-arriving aircraft, although airlines do not report specific causes in that category. 
  • Data also show the percentage of late flights delayed by weather, including those reported in either the category of extreme weather or included in National Aviation System delays. In July, 40.71 percent of late flights were delayed by weather -- up 6.54 percent from July 2011, when 38.21 percent of late flights were delayed by weather, and up 35.79 percent from June when 29.98 percent of late flights were delayed by weather. 

Mishandled baggage 

  • The U.S. carriers reporting flight delays and mishandled baggage data posted a mishandled baggage rate of 3.52 reports per 1,000 passengers in July, compared with July 2011’s rate of 3.72 and June 2012’s rate of 3.35. 

Incidents involving pets 

  • In July, carriers reported three incidents involving the loss, death or injury of pets while traveling by air; six reports were filed in July 2011 and two reports were filed in June 2012. July’s incidents involved two pet injuries and one lost pet. 

Complaints about airline service 

  • In July, there were 2,466 complaints about airline service from consumers, up 91.8 percent from the 1,286 complaints filed in July 2011, and up 49.2 percent from the 1,653 received in June 2012. 

Complaints about treatment of disabled passengers

  • The report also contains a tabulation of complaints filed with DOT in July against airlines regarding the treatment of passengers with disabilities. The department received a total of 97 disability-related complaints in July compared with 75 complaints filed in July 2011 and 81 in June 2012. 

Complaints about discrimination 

  • In July, the DOT received 16 complaints alleging discrimination by airlines due to factors other than disability -- such as race, religion, national origin or sex. There were five recorded in July 2011 and 10 in June 2012. 

Consumers may file their complaints in writing with the Aviation Consumer Protection Division, U.S. Department of Transportation, C-75, W96-432, 1200 New Jersey Ave. SE, Washington, DC 20590; by voice mail at (202) 366-2220 or by TTY at (202) 366-0511; or on the Web. 

Consumers who want on-time performance data for specific flights should call their airline’s reservation number or their travel agent. This information is available on the computerized reservation systems used by these agents. The information is also available on the appropriate carrier’s Website.

Airlines reported 18 tarmac delays of more than three hours on domestic flights and one tarmac delay of more than four hours on international flights in Ju...

Article Image

Survey of Travelers Gives Airport Security Poor Marks

Since shortly after the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, officers of a newly created security agency, the Transportation Security Administration (TSA), have been conducting screenings at U.S. airports.

It has changed the nature of air travel, with passengers taking off their shoes and in some cases submitting to full body scans before boarding an airplane. Not surprisingly, travelers are not all that fond of the process. A new survey suggests they aren't all that fond of TSA either.

The survey of frequent flyers, conducted by Frequent Business Travelers magazine, found that 90 percent of frequent flyers think the TSA is doing either a poor or fair job in performing security screenings at the nation's airports.

The respondents weren't asked about the hassle, only what they perceived the overall effectiveness of the screening process to be. It found 76.1 percent said the TSA screening procedures are either not effective or not too effective at preventing acts of terrorism on an aircraft; 19.1 percent said they were somewhat effective; 4.1 said very effective; and 0.6 said extremely effective.

The survey included responses from 1,852 people from August 10 through August 31, 2012. It was conducted in partnership with FlyerTalk, an online travel community.

Room for improvement

"The survey clearly indicates that substantial improvements are needed at America's airport security checkpoints," said Jonathan Spira, editorial director, Frequent Business Traveler. "Frequent Flyers are under the impression that the current screening process is largely security theatre."

A majority of those questioned -- 56.9 percent -- said they were not satisfied with their last security experience. Only 18.5 percent said they were either satisfied, very satisfied, or extremely satisfied.

But there is one segment of frequent flyers that appears to be more satisfied. Roughly a quarter of the respondents said they have used PreCheck, the TSA trusted traveler security lanes. Of those, 72.9 percent said they were either satisfied, very satisfied or extremely satisfied with the experience.

PreCheck is a program that allows frequent flyers to be pre-screened once. From then on, they go through an expedited boarding process.

Since shortly after the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, officers of a newly created security agency, the Transportation Security Administration (T...

Article Image

American Airlines, US Airways Explore Merger

Airline deregulation in 1978 was supposed to create competition among airlines and improve service for consumers while making airlines more profitable. It hasn't quite worked out that way.

Instead, yet another airline merger appears to be in the works. American and US Airways have entered into a non-disclosurre agreement (NDA) so they can begin exchanging confidential information, the prelude to a possible merger.

“The companies do not expect to provide any further announcements regarding the status of any such discussions unless and until the parties have entered into a transaction or discussions between the parties have been terminated,” the two carriers said in a joint statement. “Furthermore, AMR and US Airways have each agreed while they are evaluating a potential combination that they and their representatives will not engage in discussions with other parties concerning a potential combination of AMR and US Airways.”

 Series of mergers

Since Congress deregulated air travel, airline after airline has disappeared into a merger. Since 2001 there have been four major U.S. airline mergers, two of which involved. the same two airlines that are now exploring merging with one another.

In 2001 American merged with TWA. In 2005 US Airways merged with America West. In 2008 Delta merged with Northwest. In 2010 United merged with Continental. Airlines have sought to merge because operating independently did not prove profitable.

 Ironically, deregulation was supposed to make the airline industry stronger. From 1939 to 1979 the Civil Aeronautics Board (CAB) set fares and determined how many cities each airline would serve. When the airlines needed to raise fares, they had to appeal to the CAB. If the CAB allowed United to increase its fare for service from Chicago to Phoenix, for example, it also allowed a fare increase for all other carriers serving that route.

 Competing with service

With the fares the same the only way an airline could set itself apart from its competitors was convenience and service. It offered more flights and tried to provide better in-flight food and entertainment. It often few half-empty planes, which was highly inefficient but very nice for passengers.

In the era of deregulation airlines were supposed to become more profitable and stable, which was then supposed to increase choice for consumers. But with airlines now competing on price, service and convenience has suffered.

Fares are cheaper

Non-stop flights are far fewer than in the past and a hot meal in coach is a distant memory. But when adjusted for inflation, fares are now cheaper than under deregulation, even with baggage fees.

According to Businessweek, airline revenue per passenger mile has declined from an inflation-adjusted 33.3 cents in 1974, to 13 cents in the first half of 2010. In 1974 the cheapest round-trip New York-Los Angeles flight, in inflation-adjusted dollars, that regulators would allow: $1,442. Today one can fly that same route for $268. Since airfares are cheaper, more people are flying.

Still, even with loaded planes, fewer direct flights, minimal in-flight amenities and numerous fees, airlines appear to need constant mergers to stay aloft.

Airline deregulation in 1978 was supposed to create competition among airlines and improve service for consumers. It hasn't quite worked out that way.Ins...

Article Image

JetBlue Fined for Not Informing Passengers of Rights

The U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) has fined JetBlue Airways $90,000 for violating federal rules last March by not informing passengers on an aircraft delayed at New York’s JFK Airport that they had an opportunity to leave the plane as it sat at the gate with the door open. DOT also ordered the airline to cease and desist from further violations. 

JetBlue violated a provision of the DOT’s new airline consumer protection rule requiring that if passengers on a delayed flight have the opportunity to leave the aircraft, the carrier must inform them that they can deplane. Announcements that passengers can leave the plane must come 30 minutes after the scheduled departure time and every 30 minutes afterward. 

“Airlines may not leave passengers stranded indefinitely aboard an aircraft, whether on the tarmac or at the gate, and passengers must be told if they are able to leave the plane,” said U.S. Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood. “At DOT, we are committed to protecting consumers when they travel by air, and will continue to take enforcement action when our rules are violated.” 

Stuck on the tarmac 

On March 3, 2012, JetBlue Flight 645 was scheduled to depart New York’s JFK Airport at 7:30 p.m. and arrive at San Francisco at 11:16 p.m. local time. Boarding began at 7:06 p.m., but the flight was delayed and the doors to the aircraft did not close until 9:55 p.m. An investigation by DOT’s Aviation Enforcement Office found that passengers were not notified that they had the opportunity to leave the aircraft during this delay, even though the aircraft door was open and customers could have deplaned at any time. 

The Enforcement Office also found that JetBlue’s contingency plan for long tarmac delays did not contain the assurance, as required by the DOT rule, that passengers on delayed flights will receive notifications about the status of the delay every 30 minutes, including the reasons for the delay. 

DOT’s new airline consumer protection rule, which took effect in August 2011, was adopted as part of the department’s efforts to prevent passengers from being left for extended periods aboard aircraft. The new rule expanded an existing ban on tarmac delays of more than three hours on domestic flights, which took effect in April 2010, by adding a four-hour limit for tarmac delays on international flights operating at U.S. airports. Exceptions to the tarmac-delay limits are allowed only for safety, security, and air traffic control-related reasons.

The U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) has fined JetBlue Airways $90,000 for violating federal rules last March by not informing passengers on an airc...

Article Image

Class-Action Suit Brought Against Spirit Airlines For Tricking Passengers

A group of lawyers is accusing Spirit Airlines of pulling a fast one.

The law firm Podhurst Orseck, based in Miami, Fla. said the airline duped customers by saying its Passenger Usage Fee was a government fee, when it was allegedly just a fee set by Spirit to increase its profits.

A class action suit has been filed against the airline and millions of passengers are expected to be covered, said the firm.

Katherine Ezell, one of the lawyers working on the suit, says Spirit purposely misled customers into believing the passenger fee was a mandatory expense. She also accused the airline of going against federal regulations by not being forthcoming about its costs.

“Since 2008, Spirit Airlines intentionally employed deceptive pricing practices, unlawfully extracting more than $40 million from the class,” she said. “With every ticket sold online or over the phone, Spirit clearly disobeyed the Department of Transportation with the goal of duping its unsuspecting customers. Our lawsuit will aim to hold Spirit accountable for its actions.”

In November 2011, the Transportation Department fined Spirit $50,000 for violating federal aviation laws and the Department’s rules prohibiting deceptive price advertising in air travel.

For a period of time in June 2011, the latest lawsuit says, Spirit used billboards and hand-held posters to advertise new service from Los Angeles that contained an asterisk next to the advertised fare.  On the billboards, the asterisk led to small print which stated that additional taxes, fees and conditions would apply, but did not disclose the amount of those taxes and fees.  The posters did not include any information about the taxes and fees or their amounts. 

Spirit hasn't really built a reputation of offering the most luxurious travel experience, and some even consider the Miramar-based airline to be the Greyhound of the skies when it comes to service and comfortable flights.

“We had a very rough takeoff from Las Vegas,” said Wesley of Fort Worth, Texas in a ConsumerAffairs review. As soon as the wheels left the runway, the pilot was adjusting the plane constantly - back, forth, side to side, etc.

“When coming into Dallas, it was even worse than the takeoff. There were moments that I felt like death was imminent. The plane was rocking back and forth; we hit an air pocket not far from the ground that sent everyone into temporary weightlessness. When landing, the nose of the plane was much higher than usual and the landing was rough,” he said.

Wesley isn't alone. We conducted a computerized sentiment analysis of consumer attitudes based on 36,000 postings to social media over the last year and found results that were, well, somewhat turbulent.

Spirit never reached crusing altitude, climbing at one point to a 43% net sentiment rating but then hitting an air pocket and falling to -19% a few months later. 

Passengers displayed a full range of opinions, with some appreciating the cheap fares and others complaining about poor service.

No benefit

The questionable passenger fee, which ranges from $9 to $17, doesn't provide any customer benefit after purchasing a ticket, and the company has yet to fully explain the true purpose of the cost.

“It's an illusory fee,” Ezell said in a published interview. “It's really a tack-on to the fare, it's to increase their profits and under the DOT regulations, it should be disclosed so that the customers know what they're paying for the fare.”

Passengers rate Spirit

“Instead they have chosen to embed it with other fees that are either required or sanctioned by the government — and they give it an innocuous name -- so that it sounds like one of the other fees,” she said.

This has been a pretty fine-heavy season for Spirit Airlines, as the company was forced to pay $100,000 earlier this year for not addressing or remedying complaints filed by passengers with disabilities.

And last month the airline lost a decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals in Washington State, which said each airline had to plainly list its ticket prices, including taxes and extra fees.

According to Ezell, this new lawsuit is about making Spirit Airlines accountable for what she and her colleagues consider to be not only deceptive business practices, but a huge moneymaker for the company.

“We don't know, but we think it's possible that they've made as much as $40 million in profit,” she said.”

Spirit Airlines has since denied the claims of doing anything deceitful or illegal.

It seems a group of lawyers have accused Spirit Airlines of pulling a fast one.The law-firm Podhurst Orseck, based in Miami, Fla. said the airline duped...

Article Image

Airlines Set Record for First Half of 2012 in On-Time Performance

If this continues, air travel could actually get to be fun again.

The nation’s largest airlines set record marks during the first half of this year for on-time performance, the fewest long tarmac delays and the lowest rates of canceled flights and mishandled baggage.

According to the Air Travel Consumer Report issued by the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT), the 15 largest U.S. airlines posted an 83.7 percent on-time arrival rate during the first six months of 2012 -- the highest mark for any January-June period in the 18 years DOT has collected comparable data. The previous high was 82.8 percent in January-June 2003. The 1.1 percent cancellation rate for the six-month period also was the lowest rate for the past 18 years, with the previous low being the 1.3 percent mark set in January-June 2002.

Fewer delays

In addition, there were only four tarmac delays longer than three hours on U.S. domestic flights between January and June this year. This follows the department’s rule, which took effect in April 2010, setting a three-hour limit for aircraft carrying passengers on domestic flights to sit on the tarmac. Exceptions to the time limits are allowed only for safety, security or air traffic control-related reasons.

There were a total of 35 tarmac delays for domestic flights between January and June in 2011, the first full year the domestic tarmac delay limit was in effect. In contrast, there were 586 tarmac delays of more than three hours between January and June of 2009, the year before the tarmac delay rule went into effect. Since August 2011, U.S. and foreign airlines operating international flights at U.S. airports have been subject to a four-hour tarmac delay limit.

The reporting carriers also posted their lowest rate of mishandled baggage for a January-June period since this data was first reported in September 1987. The record of 2.97 reports of mishandled baggage per 1,000 passengers improved on the previous January-June record low of 3.60 set last year.

Our new airline consumer rules and our vigorous oversight of the aviation industry are holding airlines accountable to their customers,” said Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood. “We will continue to help make air travel as hassle-free as possible.”

The report follows Tuesday’s second meeting of the Advisory Committee for Aviation Consumer Protection. The committee, established earlier this year to advise the Secretary on measures to protect the rights of air travelers, will help the DOT continue to improve the air travel experience.

In addition to the tarmac delay rule, the department has issued other rulemakings that have encouraged carriers to improve their on-time performance. These include a rule banning the continued operation of chronically delayed flights and a requirement that airlines post on their Websites the on-time performance of their flights.

If this continues, air travel could actually get to be fun again. The nation’s largest airlines set record marks during the first half of this year for on...

Article Image

Air Travel Pre-Check Hits 2 Million Mark

Fewer of us are standing in line to take our shoes off at the nation’s airports. 

The Transportation Security Administration (TSA) has screened more than 2 million travelers through its Pre-Check prescreening initiative. 

TSA Pre-Check is currently available for U.S. citizens traveling in the United States who are members of U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) Trusted Traveler programs and select frequent travelers of participating airlines at many of the busiest airports across the country. 

How it works 

The system allows passengers to volunteer information about themselves prior to traveling domestically to expedite their checkpoint screening at participating airports. It’s all part of the agency's broader effort to implement risk-based concepts that enhance aviation security by focusing more on travelers the agency knows the least about and allowing known travelers the opportunity to expedite their travel through security checkpoints. 

"As TSA Pre-Check continues to expand to additional airports and passenger populations, we are seeing exponential growth in participation," said TSA Administrator John S. Pistole. "We are on track to bring TSA Pre-Check to 35 airports by the end of 2012 and even more next year." 

Pre-Check growing 

TSA Pre-Check is available at 19 airports and operational with five airlines, including Alaska Airlines, American Airlines, Delta Air Lines, United Airlines and US Airways. TSA will continue to add more airports and airlines to the highly acclaimed program. 

Eligible passengers include U.S. citizens of frequent traveler programs on participating airlines and current members of CBP Trusted Traveler programs, including Global Entry, SENTRI and NEXUS. Individuals interested in participating can apply online. 

New screening concepts 

As part of its broader risk-based security effort, TSA is in the process of testing and implementing several new screening concepts, which include an expedited screening program for flight crews, expanded behavior detection techniques, modified screening procedures for travelers 12 and younger and 75 and older, and expanding TSA Pre-Check screening benefits to U.S. military active duty members. 

TSA will always incorporate random and unpredictable security measures throughout the airport, which means that no passenger is guaranteed expedited screening. The multi-layered approach to security also includes behavior detection officers, explosives-detection systems, canine teams, and federal air marshals, among other measures both seen and unseen.

Fewer of us are standing in line to take our shoes off at the nation’s airports....

Article Image

Direct Air Shutdown Draws Fine for World Atlantic Airlines

World Atlantic Airlines will pay $180,000 in fines for violating rules protecting passengers when their public charter flights are suddenly canceled. 

World Atlantic was one of several carriers operating flights for Direct Air, a charter operator also known as Myrtle Beach Direct Air & Tours, which ceased operating in March. Direct Air arranged charters from a number of cities in the Midwest and Northeast to Myrtle Beach, SC and cities in Florida. 

“Our public charter rules are designed to protect consumers from sudden cancellations and being stranded away from home with no return flight,” said U.S. Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood. “We will continue to hold airlines and charter operators accountable when they fail to respect the rights of charter passengers.” 

No service 

World Atlantic stopped flying charters for Direct Air on March 13, following a week in which Direct Air failed to pay the carrier all the money it was owed for operating the flights. A number of payments prior to that were late. 

Numerous passengers did not receive the service they paid Direct Air for when World Atlantic canceled the remaining flights it was scheduled to operate for Direct Air. 

In issuing its fine against World Atlantic, the U.S. Department of Transportation’s (DOT)   Aviation Enforcement Office said the carrier violated rules requiring that it be paid prior to operating a public charter flight and prohibiting the cancellation of such flights less than 10 days before their scheduled departure. In addition, the carrier providing the transportation is required to ensure return flights for all U.S.-originating round-trip passengers who have flown the outbound leg of their trip. 

Carriers also are required to make a reasonable effort to ensure that the charter operator for which they are providing flights is complying with the public charter rules. 

The Enforcement Office noted that the late payments should have prompted World Atlantic to look into whether Direct Air was following the rules. DOT is continuing to investigate Direct Air’s shutdown.

World Atlantic Airlines will pay $180,000 in fines for violating rules protecting passengers when their public charter flights are suddenly canceled....

Article Image

Court: Airlines Must Include Taxes In Ads

Consumers will get a bit more information about the true cost of an airline ticket, thanks to a court ruling. A U.S. Court of Appeals said airlines must include taxes and other government fees in their advertised fares.

The requirement is part of new U.S. Transportation Department rules designed to promote transparency in air fares. It said any advertised fare must be the entire price the consumer will pay for the ticket. The rule was challenged in court by Southwest Airlines, Spirit Air and Allegiant Travel.

Some consumer groups wanted the rule to go even further, pointing out that nearly all airlines now charges fees for checked bags and other perks that were once included in the price of the ticket. Airlines have resisted including fees in ads, pointing out not everyone checks a bag, or the same number of bags.

While some customers have gotten used to the baggage fees, James, a Delta customer from Smyrna, TN, says the airline is now adding insult to injury.

Ads on bags

“I recently flew from Charlotte to Atlanta,” James wrote in a ConsumerAffairs post. “I paid $60 to check 2 bags. When I picked up my luggage, there was an advertisement on each of them. It's called a 'Deltabagtag', and is a promotion for the Atlanta Braves. If I am going to pay $30 per bag, the last thing I want to do is have an advertisement placed on it. More to the point, if Delta is going to advertise directly on my luggage, it should be free to check a bag. It's disgusting that this airline, which got me to Atlanta 30 minutes late, rubs in my face the fact they charge exorbitant baggage fees by forcing me to remove advertisement tags from my luggage which they tied around the handles of my bags.”

In the case before the court, the justices voted 2-1 to side with the Transportation Department, rejecting the airlines' arguments that advertising base fares are not deceptive. Airlines want to advertise the lowest fares possible for competitive reasons. Having to advertise higher fares might not lose business to other airlines, but it might cause consumers to seek alternate forms of travel.

The court also upheld two other new rules requiring airlines to allow customers to cancel tickets without penalty within 24 hours of purchase, as long as they purchased them more than a week before the flight. And thanks to the court, airlines will be barred from raising fees after a customer has already purchased a ticket.

Consumers will get a bit more information about the true cost of an airline ticket, thanks to a court ruling. A U.S. Court of Appeals said airlines must in...

Article Image

Airlines Turn In Mixed On-Time Performance for May

The nation’s largest airlines posted an on-time arrival rate of 83.4 percent in May – better than the 77.1 percent rate of a year earlier, but slightly worse that the April rate of  86.3 percent, according to the U.S. Department of Transportation’s (DOT) Air Travel Consumer Report. 

Airlines also reported one tarmac delay of more than three hours on a domestic flight and one tarmac delay of more than four hours on an international flight in May. 

The larger U.S. airlines have been required to file complete reports on their long tarmac delays for domestic flights since October 2008. Under a new rule that took effect Aug. 23, 2011, all U.S. and foreign airlines operating at least one aircraft with 30 or more passenger seats must report lengthy tarmac delays at U.S. airports. 

In addition. carriers operating international flights may not allow tarmac delays at U.S. airports to last longer than four hours. There is a separate three-hour limit on tarmac delays involving domestic flights, which went into effect in April 2010. 

Exceptions to the time limits for both domestic and international flights are allowed only for safety, security or air traffic control-related reasons. 

The report also includes data on cancellations, chronically delayed flights, and the causes of flight delays along with information on consumer service, disability, and discrimination complaints. There’s also a section on incidents involving pets traveling by air. 

Cancellations 

  • During May, the carriers canceled 0.9 percent of their scheduled domestic flights, compared with May 2011’s 2.1 percent cancellation rate and April 2012’s 1.0 percent. 

Chronically delayed flights 

  • At the end of May, there was one flight that was chronically delayed -- more than 30  minutes late more than 50 percent of the time -- for two consecutive months. No flights were chronically delayed for three consecutive months or more. 

Causes of flight delays 

  • In May, the carriers filing on-time performance data reported that 4.75 percent of their flights were delayed by aviation system delays, compared with 3.56 percent in April; 5.56 percent by late-arriving aircraft, versus 4.59 percent in April; 4.59 percent by factors within the airline’s control, such as maintenance or crew problems, compared with 4.04 percent in April; 0.58 percent by extreme weather, compared with 0.39 percent in April; and 0.03 percent for security reasons, compared with 0.02 percent in April. 
  • Weather is a factor in both the extreme-weather category and the aviation-system category. This includes delays due to the re-routing of flights by DOT’s Federal Aviation Administration in consultation with the carriers involved. Weather is also a factor in delays attributed to late-arriving aircraft, although airlines do not report specific causes in that category. 
  • Data also show the percentage of late flights delayed by weather, including those reported in either the category of extreme weather or included in National Aviation System delays. In May, 38.53 percent of late flights were delayed by weather, down 9.23 percent from May 2011, when 42.45 percent of late flights were delayed by weather, and up 35.05 percent from April when 28.53 percent of late flights were delayed by weather. 

Mishandled baggage 

  • The U.S. carriers reporting flight delays and mishandled baggage data posted a mishandled baggage rate of 2.77 reports per 1,000 passengers in May, better than May 2011’s rate of 3.54 but up from April 2012’s rate of 2.63. 

Incidents involving pets 

  • In May, carriers reported four incidents involving the loss, death, or injury of pets while traveling by air -- up from both the two reports filed in May 2011 and three this past April. May’s incidents involved three pet deaths and one pet injury. 

Complaints about airline service 

  • In May, the Department received 1,260 complaints about airline service -- up 18.3 percent from the 1,065 complaints received in May 2011, and up 18.0 percent from the 1,068 complaints filed in April 2012. 

Complaints about treatment of disabled passengers 

  • The report also contains a tabulation of complaints filed with DOT in May against airlines regarding the treatment of passengers with disabilities. The Department received a total of 68 disability-related complaints in May 2012, compared with 58 filed in May 2011 and 65 filed in April 2012. 

Complaints about discrimination 

  • In May, there were five complaints alleging discrimination by airlines due to factors other than disability such as race, religion, national origin or sex. There  were 10 in May 2011 and 14 received in April 2012.  

Consumers may file complaints in writing with the Aviation Consumer Protection Division, U.S. Department of Transportation, C-75, W96-432, 1200 New Jersey Ave. SE, Washington, DC 20590; by voice mail at (202) 366-2220 or by TTY at (202) 366-0511; or on the Web. 

Consumers who want on-time performance data for specific flights should call their airline’s reservation number or their travel agent. This information is available on the computerized reservation systems used by these agents. The information is also available on the appropriate carrier’s Website.

The nation’s largest airlines posted an on-time arrival rate of 83.4 percent in May – better than the 77.1 percent rate of a year earlier, but slightly wor...

Article Image

Southwest Taxis Closer to Launching Latin America Flights From Houston

Southwest Airlines may need to stock up on salsa to supplement its peanuts and pretzels. Houston Mayor Annise Parker has thrown her support behind the discount carrier's plan to build a five-gate international facility at Houston's William P. Hobby Airport. Southwest is hoping to launch flights to Mexico, Central and South America and the Caribbean from Houston Hobby, a proposal that is giving newly-merged United-Continental a severe case of heartburn.   

Latin America is United's fastest-growing market and Southwest's entry would introduce the kind of price competition that generates turbulence in legacy carriers' executive suites.  

"Today is a great day for Southwest Airlines, a great day for the city of Houston, and a great day for Houston's international travelers who have suffered for far too long from high fares and limited options," said Gary Kelly, Southwest Airlines Chairman, President, and CEO. "I want to thank Mayor Parker for her support. There is still much work to do, but I believe our proposal shows that we are committed to bringing international service to Hobby, without the city taking on additional debt."

Southwest has agreed to spend $100 million to build the international facility at Hobby.  Although the mayor has now signed on, the plan must till be approved by the city council. Southwest has been lobbying the flying public as well as politicians and regulators, launching a publicity campaign and Web site titled www.freehobbyairport.com, where travelers can learn more and sign a petition supporting the carrier's plan.

United's argument

United, the world's largest airline by traffic, opposes the move, which it says would weaken Houston's larger airport, Bush Intercontinental. United claims a Southwest entry would kill jobs and hurt the local economy.

United currently dominates international traffic from Houston, with 88 daily fights to 54 destinations in Latin America, all from Bush Intercontinental. Southwest says it would operate 20 to 25 international flights daily from Hobby within eight years.

A study commissioned by the city's airport system found that new international flights would reduce the market's average fares by 55% and attract 1.5 million additional fliers a year, delivering a $1.6 billion impact and up to 18,000 jobs for the region. United calls those figures "grossly exaggerated," and concludes that competition from Southwest would force United to pull 50 daily flights to Latin America from Houston, resulting in a regional economic hit of $295 million and 3,700 jobs.

If it is shut out of Houston, Southwest will likely look to Austin or San Antonio as its Latin American gateway. A 33-year-old federal regulation bans it from flying internationally out of Dallas, where it has a large operation at Love Field.

Southwest Airlines may need to stock up on salsa to supplement its peanuts and pretzels. Houston Mayor Annise Parker has thrown her support behind the disc...

Article Image

Airlines Made $3.4 Billion in Baggage Fees Last Year

It's a wonder why the airlines are always complaining of losing money and making less profit, when they now charge you for everything from that semi-cold can of soda, to that used-to-be-free bag of chips.

According to a report from the Department of Transportation, airlines made an amount of $3.4 billion in baggage fees in 2011.

Although down from 2010's fourth quarter, airlines showed a 1.5 percent profit margin from October through December of 2011, and the 17 biggest airlines accumulated $3.36 billion from baggage fees in that same year.

How do consumers feel about this? We conducted a computerized sentiment analysis of about 39,000 postings on social media over the last year and found the prevailing sentiment soundly in negative territory.

The emotions we encountered were the usual ones -- love, hate and not too much in between

Not just baggage 

However, it wasn't just baggage fees that allowed airline carriers to be in the black in 2011, as $2.38  billion also came from reservation change fees. The added charges and fees came in a desperate attempt from airlines to compensate for higher fuel costs and lower consumer spending. But simply adding extra costs to plane tickets wouldn't of provided airlines with enough financial leverage to fully recover, so in came the fees.

Industry experts do state however, that though airlines are raking in the customer's dough, many are still struggling to stay afloat. "Even with these impressive revenues from ancillary fees, some airlines are still reporting razor-thin profit margins thanks to increased fuel costs," said Airfarewatchdog.com's George Hobica in an interview. "Imagine what would have happened without them."

But with consumers bearing the financial brunt of the slumping airline industry, it's a challenge for the customer to have feelings of sympathy for the carriers. "The public hates the airlines now, said Hobica in a separate statement. "They are in a race to bottom with a vicious cycle of higher fees."

Delta, American Airlines, and U.S. Airways made the most from bag fees last year, at $864 million, $593 million and $506 million respectively.

Some of the things that experts advise to consumers for avoiding the dreaded baggage fee is:

  • Bringing only what you know you will use on your trip. Bringing that just-in-case outfit may not be the best travel decision. 
  • Try wearing a couple of items instead of stuffing them into your bag. The airlines haven't yet started charging passengers for layering their clothes, so your body is still the perfect carry-on.
  • Be mindful of exactly how much weight your bag is before getting to the airport. You can even set your packed bag on your bathroom scale, as readings will be pretty close to what the airport scale says.

But it seems like the consumers have already begun to change their flying methods, as overall fee-profits are slightly down from 2010 for airlines. But make no mistake about it, airline executives are already on their way to boardrooms to create new fees to bulk up their purse and make you dig into your pocket even more. 

Oh, how creative some can get around a conference table when extra funds are desperately needed.

It's a wonder why the airlines are always complaining of loosing money and making less profit, when they now charge you for everything from that semi-...

Article Image

Airlines Improve On-Time Performance

With milder than normal winter weather, U.S. domestic airlines were able to compile their best on-time arrival rate for the first quarter of any year since the U.S. Department of Transportation began keeping records.

Normally, icy weather in January, February and March results in numerous delays. The on-time arrival rate in the first quarter this year was 84 percent. That beats the previous record of 81.3 set in 2002.

Airlines reported three tarmac delays of more than three hours on domestic flights and no tarmac delays of more than four hours on international flights in March. All of the long domestic tarmac delays took place on March 17 in St. Louis, a day when severe storms took place in the area.

Complaints about airline service

Even though more flights were on time, not everyone was happy in the passenger cabin. In March, the government said it received 1,117 complaints about airline service from consumers, up 39.1 percent from the 803 complaints received in March 2011 and up 61.6 percent from the 691 complaints filed in February 2012.

A total of 213 of the March complaints involved the charter operator Direct Air ceasing operations. For the first quarter of this year, the Transportation Department received 2,743 complaints, up 16.8 percent from the 2,348 filed during the first quarter of 2011.

Unhappy fliers also post complaints online, at sites like ConsumerAffairs.

“On March 18, 2012, I used my United flier miles for a business class upgrade for two seats and was charged an additional $150,” Scott, of Montclair, N.J., posted at ConsumerAffairs. “The requests were put on a wait list and we failed to receive the upgrades. Nearly a month later, the airline had not refunded the miles and did so only after I called, waited 20 minutes on the phone, and complained. They told me the $150 was an administrative fee and to go to another location to request the $150 refund. Calling them directly is impossible and their fax number has been busy for a week. I would not have even requested the upgrade if not for the fact that the website said upgrades were available. I fail to see how they can charge a fee for a service that they did not perform.”

Patsy, of Houston, Tex., complained about the service on Delta. And she says it's not just bad in coach.

“I flew first class to Milan,” Patsy writes. “The flight attendants spent the night talking. I asked if they would mind keeping it down. The flight attendant turned her back on me. The male flight attendant stood and watched me struggle to take my bag down with no offer of assistance. The return flight was cancelled without any communication. I lost my bag for four days. I have called numerous Delta numbers. I got told to call this number. I called and I got sent to another number. This customer service is the worst I have experienced from an airline.”

More bumping, fewer lost bags

Slightly more passengers on the 15 reporting airlines got bumped in the first quarter than in the first quarter of 2011, but the airlines did a better job of keeping up with bags.

The Department of Transportation report shows the airlines posted a mishandled baggage rate of 3.09 reports per 1,000 passengers in March, better than March 2011’s rate of 3.32 but up from February 2012’s rate of 2.64, which was the best mark for a single month since the Department began collecting this data in September 1987. For the first quarter of this year, the carriers posted a mishandled baggage rate of 3.01 reports per 1,000 passengers, an improvement over the 3.73 rate for the first quarter of 2011.

With milder than normal winter weather, U.S. domestic airlines were able to compile their best on-time arrival rate for the first quarter of any year since...

Article Image

Air India Fined for Violating New Consumer Rules

The U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) has assessed a civil penalty of $80,000 against Air India for failing to post customer service and tarmac delay contingency plans on its website as well as failing to adequately inform passengers about its optional fees. 

This is the first penalty assessed for a violation of the Department’s new airline consumer rules that took effect last August. 

“Our new airline consumer rules help ensure that passengers are fully informed about airline services and fees and what to expect if their flight is delayed on the tarmac,” U.S. Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood said.  “We will continue to monitor carriers to make sure they comply with our rules and take enforcement action when they do not.”

Beginning Aug. 23, 2011, foreign carriers operating to the United States with at least one aircraft of 30 or more seats have been required to adopt contingency plans for lengthy tarmac delays as well as customer service plans, and to post these plans on their websites.  U.S. carriers have been covered by this requirement since April 29, 2010. 

In addition, also beginning Aug. 23, both U.S. carriers and foreign carriers with a website that sells tickets to U.S. consumers have been required to include on their homepages a prominent hyperlink that takes viewers directly to a page that shows all fees for optional services the carrier charges, including baggage fees. 

Air India failed to post its customer service and tarmac delay contingency plans and to provide a link to its optional fees by the required date.

The U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) has assessed a civil penalty of $80,000 against Air India for failing to post customer service and tarmac delay...

Article Image

TSA Expands Pre-Check Program to More Airports

Tired of shrugging off your shoes and belt each time you slog through the airport security line?  The Transportation Security Administration (TSA) is expanding PreCheck program, which lets pre-approved travelers move through security more quickly.

“TSA PreCheck moves us closer to our goal of delivering the most effective and efficient screening by recognizing that most passengers do not pose a threat to security,” said TSA Administrator John S. Pistole. “We are pleased to expand this important effort, in collaboration with our airline and airport partners, as we move away from a one-size-fits-all approach to a more intelligence-driven, risk-based transportation security system.”

Pistole and Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Secretary Janet Napolitano said the program has screened 336,000 passengers so far at seven pilot locations around the country and is now being expanded to 28 airports in major cities.

They said the concept enhances security by enabling TSA to focus its efforts on passengers the agency knows less about while providing expedited screening for travelers who volunteer information about themselves prior to flying. Also, it means prescreened passengers can avoid taking their shoes off and may even be able to keep their belts on.

Program members’ bags are still run though the x-ray conveyer belt and they are still required to go through a metal detector, but they are not subject to shoe or coat removal requirements and don’t have to remove their laptops or liquids packed in carry-on bags.

Initially, the program will only be available to passengers traveling on US Airways, United Continental, Alaska, American and Delta Airlines.

Eligible participants include some frequent fliers from participating airlines as well as members of the Customs and Border Protection’s Trusted Traveler programs. Those travelers who apply for the program and are approved will get special barcodes on their boarding passes that tell TSA screeners to move them to an expedited screening line.

Frequent travelers can apply through the TSA’s Global Entry program here.

Airports that will be added this year include:

  • Baltimore/Washington International Thurgood Marshall Airport (BWI)
  • Boston Logan International Airport (BOS)
  • Charlotte Douglas International Airport (CLT)
  • Cincinnati/Northern Kentucky International Airport (CVG)
  • Denver International Airport (DEN)
  • Fort Lauderdale-Hollywood International Airport (FLL)
  • George Bush Intercontinental Airport (IAH)
  • Honolulu International Airport (HNL)
  • Indianapolis International Airport (IND)
  • John F. Kennedy International Airport (JFK)
  • LaGuardia Airport (LGA)
  • Lambert-St. Louis International Airport (STL)
  • Louis Armstrong New Orleans International Airport (MSY)
  • Luis Muñoz Marín International Airport (SJU)
  • Newark Liberty International Airport (EWR)
  • O’Hare International Airport (ORD)
  • Orlando International Airport (MCO)
  • Philadelphia International Airport (PHL)
  • Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport (PHX)
  • Pittsburgh International Airport (PIT)
  • Portland International Airport (PDX)
  • Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport (DCA)
  • Salt Lake City International Airport (SLC)
  • San Francisco International Airport (SFO)
  • Seattle-Tacoma International Airport (SEA)
  • Tampa International Airport (TPA)
  • Ted Stevens Anchorage International Airport (ANC)
  • Washington Dulles International Airport (IAD)

Tired of shrugging off your shoes and belt each time you slog through the airport security line?  The Transportation Security Administration (TSA) is...