
Sandra of Port St. Lucie, FL on Jan. 5, 2003
In January, 1999, Staples ran a sales ad for a Proteva computer, monitor and printer package. Included in the package were 3 rebates. The first rebate was on the printer, a Canon BJC-250. The second and third were for $70 and $100 from the Proteva Company. I sent the rebate coupons with the appropriate information to the proper addresses, on 2/3/99. Canon responded in a proper and timely manner and I received the $30 rebate with no problems or questions. I waited and waited patiently to hear from Proteva with the checks for the two rebate requests I had submitted to them.
Finally on May 17, I called the Proteva company, who promptly gave me an 800 number to call for the rebate processing company. The name of the processing company is Continental Promotion Group in Scottsdale, Arizona, and their phone number is 1-800-340-0108. I spoke with a gentleman who informed me first that I was denied the $70 rebate because all of the bar codes required were not included with the request. He informed me that I had failed to send in the bar code for the printer. When I told him that I had a copy of everything I had sent to the company, he decided to check further and came back with the statement that a check for $70 was being cut that very day.
Then we began to discuss the $100 rebate. Again, he told me that I had been denied because of failing to comply with the terms of the rebate coupon. When I asked what I failed to do, he told me I had not included the bar code from the bottom of the monitor box. When I reminded him that I had made copies of everything I had sent, he reconsidered and said that he was entering a reversal in the computer regarding the original decision and that I should have a check in a reasonable amount of time.
My next contact with Proteva was on July 9, 1999, when I called to complain that I still had not received the $100 as promised. He said that he has a contact person, named "Julie", at the rebate center in Scottsdale, Arizona, and that he would email her that very afternoon. He said that it may take a few days to get back to me, but that he would personally follow up on the matter. Trying to give the man the benefit of the doubt, I waited until July 28 to hear from him. When no call or letter came, I telephoned Tom to find out what he had learned from "Julie". He fumbled around with his words for a few seconds, as if trying to decide what story to tell me. When he finally became coherent, he told me that he still hadn't heard from "Julie" and that he would send her another email. I assured him that this was totally unacceptable and that I felt that I had waited long enough to received my money. He said that there was no more that he could do, other than to recontact "Julie" because the rebates were handled strictly by the processing center and they alone made the decisions to pay or not pay, not Proteva.
I finally gave up with trying to talk any sense with this person, Tom, and called the rebate processing company. I spoke with a representative, named Rosa, who told me that the rebate had been denied. When I told her about the call to the rebate center in May and that the representative at that time had assured me that I would be receiving the $100 check, she said to give her a moment to check further. After "checking further", she said that the hold up was the fact that they were waiting for "approval" from Proteva. I explained to her that "Tom" at Proteva had told me that the total and final decision was made by Continental Promotion Group solely, she said that all she knew was that the computer showed that they were awaiting approval from Proteva. I asked numerous times regarding the person, "Julie", and Rosa just ignored me each time and said that she was sorry, that I would have to contact Proteva.
By this time, I am so angry, I am about in tears. I called Tom back and told him about my conversation with Rosa and he told me to hang on while he tried to reach "Julie" direct. He came back on the line a few seconds later and said that he had Julie on the other line and that for me to please wait while he discussed the matter with her. Finally, when he did come back on the line, he told me that we had a problem. Guess what? I had failed to include the bar code from the monitor. We were right back to square one. I reminded him that I had copies of what had been sent and he said he was sorry, that the decision had been made and there was no more he could do for me. I asked him to give me his name and address and allow me to send him a copy of what I had right in front of me al along. To this he said that it was too late and that the rebate processing center allowed customers five months to resolve any differences regarding their decision and that my five months were now expired.
I asked him how that could be, when I had started the process on May 17, well before any five month time limited could have transpired and he said he was sorry, there was no more he could do for me. This is where the story stands to date. I read the story of M.B. of Oxford, NJ. I had to laugh because they had her address to send a post card to tell her that they could not honor her request for the rebates because she had not included her street address. How in the world did they send her the post card?