CONSUMER NEWS    RECALLS    COMPLAINT FORM    SCAM ALERTS  


Complain about a product or service

Small Claims Guide | Class Actions | Lemon Law | FAQ | Resources | Newsletters | Spanish
Automotive    Education    Electronics    Family    Finance    Health    Homeowners    Shopping    Travel   
NEWS   Latest |  Archives |  Auto |  Cells, etc. |  Computers |  Financial |  Health |  Homeowners |  Parents |  Privacy |  Scams |  Seniors |  Travel

Vioxx Pain Worsens



October 22, 2004
The Vioxx withdrawal is one of those pains that just won't go away. Doctors are in a quandary and many patients who had come to rely on Vioxx and related drugs are having trouble finding a satisfactory replacement. Manufacturer Merck's profits have plummeted and regulators around the world are considering what to do next.

Related Stories

Researchers Claim Vioxx Safety Study Was Actually Marketing Plan
First Vioxx Judgment Overturned On Appeal
Merck Agrees to Pay $58 Million to Settle Vioxx Claims
Researchers Claim Merck Cooked Vioxx Data
Common Pain Relievers May Boost Muscle Mass
More Painkillers Can Cause More Pain
Merck Caves, Agrees To $4.85 Billion Vioxx Settlement
New York Sues Vioxx Maker over Drug’s Risks
Merck Wins Vioxx Case In Illinois
Judge Rules Out Vioxx "Super" Class Action
FDA Critic Blasts Merck's Vioxx Replacement
Merck Loses New Orleans Vioxx Case
Merck Wins Latest Vioxx Suit
Vioxx Study Authors Backtrack On Claim
Older Painkillers May Increase Heart Attack Risk
More about Vioxx
---
Other NSAIDs
Bextra
Celebrex
Dangers of Other Vioxx-Type Drugs
Vioxx Alternatives
Aleve Ingredient Seen as Health Risk

Merck withdrew the drug September 30 after a study showed that prolonged usage could double the risk of heart attack and stroke. That left about 1.3 million Americans looking for a substitute.

Unfortunately, the most likely substitutes -- Pfizer's Celebrex and Bextra -- are also under a cloud of suspicion. All three drugs are a new category of painkiller called COX-2 inhibitors. They're said to be superior to aspirin-type, anti-inflammatory drugs because they're less likely to cause gastrointestinal bleeding and many patients find them more effective at relieving the pain of arthritis and other chronic disorders.

Researchers say the number of patients who have had heart attacks or strokes as a result of taking Vioxx could range from 30,000 to 100,000. That does nothing to comfort patients who have few side effects clearly traced to Vioxx.

"I took Vioxx for about 2 years and now am very concerned with my future health," Denise of Omaha said in a complaint to ConsumerAffairs.com. "At this point I have occasional chest pains and heart beat skips once in a while."

Doctors are also looking for solutions, now that another "miracle" drug has fallen from its pedestal.

"I had a lot of patients on Vioxx. In some cases, it was the only thing that worked for them," said Dr. John Givogre, a Gainesville, Ga., pain management specialist quoted in the Gainesville Times.

The American Medical Association has cautioned physicians to think twice before prescribing any COX-2 medication. But Givogre said he's switched many of his patients to Celebrex or Bextra despite the warning. He said there's no firm evidence of increased cardiovascular risk in other COX-2 drugs.

Merck

The sudden withdrawal of one of its top-selling drugs is a financial cataclysm for Merck. The company says it has lost $553 million in profits from lost sales and, even worse, faces a mountain of lawsuits that could bankrupt the company.

Merck has been hit with at least 300 lawsuits so far from former patients alleging various side-effects, and it also faces shareholder lawsuits. Merck said it thinks it has liability insurance of up to $630m, although it admits that some of its insurers are disputing this.

Merck, based in Whitehouse Station, N.J., yesterday said its net income slumped 29 percent to $1.33 billion, or 60 cents per share, from $1.86 billion a year earlier.

Pfizer

Hoping to counter negative reaction to COX-2 drugs, Pfizer is planning to sponsor a major clinical study to further assess its COX-2 medication Celebrex in osteoarthritis patients at high risk for cardiovascular disease.

This study is part of a larger CV exploration program with Celebrex that started over 18 months ago. This newly announced clinical trial, which will be conducted at major universities and hospitals around the world, is expected to start early in 2005. Due to recent questions raised about the cardiovascular safety of the COX-2 specific inhibitors, Pfizer will be discussing the study design with the FDA and other regulatory agencies prior to finalizing its details and start date.

Pfizer officials say they remain confidence in the safety of Celebrex, pointing to "the substantial body of experience" gained in several trials.

"In fact, small mechanistic studies suggest that Celebrex's anti-inflammatory properties as well as additional unique Celebrex-specific characteristics may improve vascular function in patients with established coronary artery disease. That is why we feel it is important at this time to announce our plans to conduct the first large-scale clinical study involving the use of a COX-2 specific inhibitor to look at inflammation and CV events in osteoarthritis patients at high risk for cardiovascular disease," said Dr. Joseph Feczko, MD, president of worldwide development at Pfizer.

The study will enroll more than 4,000 patients around the world who have had a recent heart attack and who also have a history of osteoarthritis. The study will assess the effects of Celebrex on inflammation and cardiovascular (CV) events. The multi-center, randomized, placebo-controlled study will be conducted over a period of at least two years and will include rigorous monitoring of cardiovascular safety by an independent data safety monitoring committee, the company said.

Pfizer said more than 27 million patients in the U.S. have been prescribed Celebrex, which was approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in 1998. It says patients treated in clinical studies of up to 4 years show no increased CV safety concerns.

Regulators Ponder

The European Commission has ordered a full-scale probe into the safety of the remaining COX-2 drugs. The London-based European Medicines Agency said on Friday it had been given the go-ahead for the investigation after a preliminary review established there were serious safety questions.

The European review will include Novartis AG's new COX-2 drug Prexige, now on sale in Britain and Australia but not yet approved elsewhere in the European Union or the United States.

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is planning an advisory committee to review the safety of the COX-2 drug class in January 2005.



Report Your Experience
If you've had a bad experience -- or a good one -- with a consumer product or service, we'd like to hear about it. All complaints are reviewed by class action attorneys and are considered for publication on our site. Knowledge is power! Help spread the word. File your consumer report now.


Consumer News

September 5 2008

Recent Recalls & Safety Alerts



FREE CONSUMER NEWSLETTERS

The Daily Consumer
Afternoons M-F

Sign up now!


Consumer News & Alerts
Every Sunday

Sign up now!


Knowledge is free.
Knowledge is power.



Back to the top |


Home | Complaint Form | News | Recalls | FAQ |
Consumer Resources | Small Claims Guide | Lemon Law | Newsletter | Contact Us
Advertise With Us | Testimonials | Newsroom | RSS Feeds |


Terms of Use Your use of this site constitutes acceptance of the Terms of Use

Advertisements on this site are placed and controlled by outside advertising networks. ConsumerAffairs.com does not evaluate or endorse the products and services advertised. See the FAQ for more information.

Company Response Welcome If complaints about your company appear on our site, we welcome your response. Please see the Response Form for more information.

For more information, see the FAQ and privacy policy. The information on this Web site is general in nature and is not intended as a substitute for competent legal advice.  ConsumerAffairs.com Inc. makes no representation as to the accuracy of the information herein provided and assumes no liability for any damages or loss arising from the use thereof. 

Copyright © 2003-2008 ConsumerAffairs.com Inc.  All Rights Reserved.    The contents of this site may not be republished, reprinted, rewritten or recirculated without written permission.