CONSUMER NEWS RECALLS COMPLAINT FORM SCAM ALERTS

Small Claims Guide \| Class Actions \| Lemon Law \| FAQ \| Resources \| Newsletters \| Spanish
Automotive Education Electronics Family Finance Health Homeowners Shopping Travel

Merck Faces Criminal Probe in Vioxx Case

Pfizer Considers Black Box Warning for Bextra

November 9, 2004
Merck says the U.S. Justice Department has opened a criminal investigation into the company's handling of Vioxx and the Securities and Exchange Commission has begun an informal inquiry. Pfizer, meanwhile, says it is likely to add a "black box" warning on its pain killer Bextra.

Related Stories

• Researchers Claim Vioxx Safety Study Was Actually Marketing Plan
• First Vioxx Judgment Overturned On Appeal
• Merck Agrees to Pay $58 Million to Settle Vioxx Claims
• Researchers Claim Merck Cooked Vioxx Data
• Common Pain Relievers May Boost Muscle Mass
• More Painkillers Can Cause More Pain
• Merck Caves, Agrees To $4.85 Billion Vioxx Settlement
• New York Sues Vioxx Maker over Drug’s Risks
• Merck Wins Vioxx Case In Illinois
• Judge Rules Out Vioxx "Super" Class Action
• FDA Critic Blasts Merck's Vioxx Replacement
• Merck Loses New Orleans Vioxx Case
• Merck Wins Latest Vioxx Suit
• Vioxx Study Authors Backtrack On Claim
• Older Painkillers May Increase Heart Attack Risk
• More about Vioxx
---
Other NSAIDs
• Bextra
• Celebrex
• Dangers of Other Vioxx-Type Drugs
• Vioxx Alternatives
• Aleve Ingredient Seen as Health Risk

The company made the disclosure in a regulatory filing. It withdrew the popular pain killer from the market in September following studies which found the drug increased the risk of heart attack and stroke in patients who took it for more than 18 months.

Merck has been criticized for dragging its feet in withdrawing Vioxx, which brought in as much as $2.5 billion per year. Merck has insisted it acted promptly. In a statement yesterday, the company said it withdrew Vioxx just one week after learning the results of a company-sponsored clinical trial that demonstrated Vioxx's risks.

In its filing yesterday, Merck said that as of Oct. 31, it was a defendant in about 375 Vioxx personal-injury lawsuits, involving about 1,000 plaintiff groups. It said it expects more lawsuits to be filed.

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) estimates that Vioxx may have contributed to 27,785 heart attacks and sudden cardiac deaths between 1999 and 2003. The estimate is based on the number of prescriptions issued for Vioxx between 1999 and 2003.

Bextra

In its quarterly report yesterday, Pfizer said Bextra, which is similar to Vioxx, can sometimes lead to a serious skin reaction.

It a few cases, the reaction leads to Stevens Johnson syndrome, in which the immune system attacks itself to rid itself of a drug, in effect burning the patient from the inside out.

The syndrome leads to severe, painful blistering of the mucous membranes and skin. Patients often end up in the burn unit. the mortality rate is about 30 percent.

A "black box" warning is the most serious warning available for prescription drugs.

Report Your Experience
If you've had a bad experience -- or a good one -- with a consumer product or service, we'd like to hear about it. All complaints are reviewed by class action attorneys and are considered for publication on our site. Knowledge is power! Help spread the word. File your consumer report now.

August 22 2008

FREE CONSUMER NEWSLETTERS

The Daily Consumer
Afternoons M-F
Sign up now!

Consumer News & Alerts
Every Sunday
Sign up now!

Knowledge is free.
Knowledge is power.

Back to the top |

Terms of Use Your use of this site constitutes acceptance of the Terms of Use

Advertisements on this site are placed and controlled by outside advertising networks. ConsumerAffairs.com does not evaluate or endorse the products and services advertised. See the FAQ for more information.

Company Response Welcome If complaints about your company appear on our site, we welcome your response. Please see the Response Form for more information.

For more information, see the FAQ and privacy policy. The information on this Web site is general in nature and is not intended as a substitute for competent legal advice. ConsumerAffairs.com Inc. makes no representation as to the accuracy of the information herein provided and assumes no liability for any damages or loss arising from the use thereof.