CONSUMER NEWS RECALLS COMPLAINT FORM SCAM ALERTS

Small Claims Guide \| Class Actions \| Lemon Law \| FAQ \| Resources \| Newsletters \| Spanish
Automotive Education Electronics Family Finance Health Homeowners Shopping Travel

NY Couple Receives $2.5 Million in Nose Case

October 20, 2004
A Rockland County, New York couple received a settlement of $2.5 million on the ninth day of a medical malpractice trial.

In the presentation of his case, David Carey, a sales manager, told the court that on Sept. 2, 1997, he visited Rockland Ear, Nose & Throat Associates in Bardonia, N.Y., complaining of a persistent sore throat, and bleeding from the back of his throat.

Dr. Leacroft Green, who examined Mr. Carey, could not detect the source of his bleeding, but he determined that Mr. Carey was suffering from a deviated septum. Dr. Green recommended and nine days later performed two procedures that do not require surgical incisions. They are usually done together: a submucosal septal resection - also known as a septoplasty -- in which portions of the septum are trimmed, reshaped and repositioned, and bilateral inferior-turbinate resection, which reduces the size of the structure that fills the lower portion of the nasal airway.

The procedures were performed at Nyack Hospital. Mr. Carey began experiencing headaches after the first part of the procedure -- the septoplasty. Mr. Carey subsequently was found to have a fracture of his cribriform plate, a portion of the spongy bone that forms the roof of the nasal fossae and part of the floor of the skull's anterior fossa.

On Oct. 9, he underwent repair surgery. He continues to experience headaches. Mr. Carey claimed that he had no nose-related problems, and thus, that the surgeries were unnecessary.

Mr. Carey also alleged that Dr. Green departed from accepted standards of practice. He contended that Dr. Green grabbed his cribriform plate rather than snipping at his nasal cartilage, and thus, that Dr. Green caused the cribriform-plate fracture. He also contended that Dr. Green should have consulted with his primary-care physician. Mr. Carey's wife, Marina Carey, presented a loss-of-services claim.

The defendents contended Mr. Carey's cribriform plate had been weakened by a sinus disease, and, as such, the damage was a risk of the surgery. They also contended the cribriform-plate damage occurred during the second half of the procedure. Thus, the defendants contended, Mr. Carey's headaches were unrelated to his cribriform-plate damage.

The defendants contended that Mr. Carey's injuries stemmed from a quiescent immune disease that became manifest months after the surgery. They contended the immune disease resulted in sinus infections, which damaged Mr. Carey's sinus tissue, and "empty nose syndrome," which contributed to his headaches.

Report Your Experience
If you've had a bad experience -- or a good one -- with a consumer product or service, we'd like to hear about it. All complaints are reviewed by class action attorneys and are considered for publication on our site. Knowledge is power! Help spread the word. File your consumer report now.

May 17 2008

READER SERVICES

Print, Email & More

Free consumer newsletters
Sign up now!

Back to the top |

Terms of Use Your use of this site constitutes acceptance of the Terms of Use

Advertisements on this site are placed and controlled by outside advertising networks. ConsumerAffairs.com does not evaluate or endorse the products and services advertised. See the FAQ for more information.

Company Response Welcome If complaints about your company appear on our site, we welcome your response. Please see the Response Form for more information.

For more information, see the FAQ and privacy policy. The information on this Web site is general in nature and is not intended as a substitute for competent legal advice. ConsumerAffairs.com Inc. makes no representation as to the accuracy of the information herein provided and assumes no liability for any damages or loss arising from the use thereof.