CONSUMER NEWS RECALLS COMPLAINT FORM SCAM ALERTS

Small Claims Guide \| Class Actions \| Lemon Law \| FAQ \| Resources \| Newsletters \| Spanish
Automotive Education Electronics Family Finance Health Homeowners Shopping Travel

Court OKs Class Action Against H&R Block

H&R Block

• Charges
• Electronic Filing
• Errors
• "Free" Filing
• Online
• Refund Anticipation Loans
• Option One Mortgage Corp.
--
News
• New York Stops H&R Block's Deceptive Sweepstakes Ads
• California Sues H&R Block
• H&R Block Sells Subprime Mortgage Unit
• H&R Block Launching Its Bank
• H&R Block Threatened Employees, Spitzer Charges
• H&R Block Settles Tax Refund Loan Suit
• H&R Block Readies New Bank as Business Soars
• NY Accuses H&R Block of IRA Marketing Fraud
• H&R Block Goofs on Its Own Taxes
• Children's Defense Fund: Tax Refund Loans "Indefensible"
• California Sues H&R Block Over Its "Instant Refund" Loans
• H&R Block Doesn't Block Identity Theft
• H&R Block Will Settle More Payday Loan Suits
• Option One Agrees to Clean Up Its Lending Practices in PA
• H&R Blocked: Consumer Groups Oppose Tax Giant's Proposed Bank
• Tentative Settlement in Tax Loan Class Action
• Class Action Challenges Electronic Filing Fee
• Supreme Court Rejects Block Appeal in Class Action
• Judge Upholds Racketeering Complaints Against H&R Block, Household
• Court Clears Class-Action Suit
• Tax Loans Victimize Consumers
---
• All About HSBC

March 4, 2004
A Pennsylvania appeals court has ruled that lawsuits accusing H&R Block Inc. of charging unnecessary fees for filing tax forms electronically can be treated as class actions and don't have to be arbitrated.

Erin McNulty and Brian Erzar sued block, claiming the company charged clients millions of dollars in unnecessary e-filing fees. The plaintiffs alleged that Block did not adequately indicate that customers could avoid the fees by filing traditional paper returns.

Block's lawyers argued that a provision in a separate contract that the clients signed with Household Bank requires any claims to be settled through arbitration, not a class action. The agreement with Household Bank was for refund anticipation loans related to the clients' tax returns.

But in the court's opinion, Pennsylvania Superior Court Judge Richard Klein held that an e-filing fee was a separate and distinct transaction from the application for the loan and wasn't covered by the arbitration clause.

"The trial court found that charging a fee to push the 'send' button (basically the equivalent of putting a stamp on an envelope) was too attenuated to the loan application process and so was exempt from the arbitration case," Klein wrote.

"We believe the court's decision runs counter to the weight of state and federal law, and are considering an appeal of the decision to the Pennsylvania Supreme Court," Block said in a statement.

The case now returns to the Lackawanna County, Pa., Court of Common Pleas for trial.

Block has faced consumer class actions and criticism dating to the mid-1990s for how it hss marketed its high-interest refund anticipation loans.

The company settled a Texas lawsuit in June that called for it to distribute $26 million in cash, as well as tax preparation and software coupons, to 700,000 tax service customers. In April, a federal judge in Chicago rejected Block's proposed settlement in a similar class-action suit. That suit is pending.

July 9 2008

Print, mail, etc.

FREE CONSUMER NEWSLETTERS

The Daily Consumer
Afternoons M-F
Sign up now!

Consumer News & Alerts
Every Sunday
Sign up now!

Knowledge is free.
Knowledge is power.

Back to the top |

Terms of Use Your use of this site constitutes acceptance of the Terms of Use

Advertisements on this site are placed and controlled by outside advertising networks. ConsumerAffairs.com does not evaluate or endorse the products and services advertised. See the FAQ for more information.

Company Response Welcome If complaints about your company appear on our site, we welcome your response. Please see the Response Form for more information.

For more information, see the FAQ and privacy policy. The information on this Web site is general in nature and is not intended as a substitute for competent legal advice. ConsumerAffairs.com Inc. makes no representation as to the accuracy of the information herein provided and assumes no liability for any damages or loss arising from the use thereof.