|
CONSUMER NEWS RECALLS COMPLAINT FORM SCAM ALERTS |
| Small Claims Guide | Class Actions | Lemon Law | FAQ | Resources | Newsletters | Spanish | |
|
|
![]() |
Court Halts Sales of HIV/AIDS Home Test Kit |
|||
|
June 1, 2004
The Federal Trade Commission filed a complaint alleging that the kit's marketer deceptively advertised that its results were 99.4 percent accurate, and was advertising and selling the kits in the United States in violation of federal laws. Judge Robert S. Lasnik ordered a temporary bar on the advertising and distribution of the kits in the United States, and ordered that any kits that are imported into the United States be seized. The FTC will seek a permanent ban on the advertising and sale of the defective kits. According to the FTC complaint, Seville Marketing, Ltd., a British Columbia, Canada, corporation, and its principal, Gregory Stephen Wong, have marketed and sold the 'Discreet' HIV home test kit from Web sites aidshivtest.com and discreettest.com. The kits cost $29.95. Advertising on the Web sites makes claims such as 'Over the past two years we've had three independent studies done on Discreet and our 99.4% accuracy rate is based upon these studies.' On behalf of the FTC, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention tested the accuracy of the kits. Results of the testing, based on the package instructions, 'changed dramatically' during the 15 minutes that the results were reported. After three minutes, 15.4 percent of the kits gave erroneous readings; after 8 minutes, 29.6 percent registered inaccurate results; after 15 minutes, 59.3 percent of the kits gave inaccurate results. Moreover, the kits showed both inaccurate HIV-positive results and inaccurate HIV-negative results. Any consumer who has previously relied upon the results of a Discreet HIV home test kit should see a health professional and take another test to determine his or her HIV status. In documents filed with the court, the FTC notes that the Discreet kits cannot legally be sold in the United States because the defendants have neither requested nor received approval from the Food and Drug Administration to sell what qualifies as a 'diagnostic' instrument under the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act. |
|||
Back to the top | |
||||
|
Home |
Complaint Form |
News |
Recalls |
FAQ |
|
Terms of Use Your use of this site constitutes acceptance of the Terms of Use
Copyright © 2003-2008 ConsumerAffairs.com Inc. All Rights Reserved. The contents of this site may not be republished, reprinted, rewritten or recirculated without written permission. |
|