The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) is launching an inquiry into checking account overdraft programs to determine how these practices are impacting consumers.
As part of that inquiry, the CFPB is seeking public input on a prototype “penalty fee box” – a disclosure on a consumer’s checking account statement that would highlight the amount overdrawn and total overdraft fees charged. Something along these lines, perhaps:

“With today’s technologies, consumers have more opportunities to access their checking accounts and cause overdrafts,” said CFPB Director Richard Cordray. “But overdraft practices have the capacity to inflict serious economic harm on the people who can least afford it. We want to learn how consumers are affected, and how well they are able to anticipate and avoid paying penalty fees.”
An overdraft occurs when a consumer spends or withdraws more money than is available in his or her checking account and the financial institution advances funds on the consumer’s behalf. Banks generally charge an overdraft fee for each transaction that they choose to cover.
For point-of-sale debit card and ATM transactions, regulations by the Federal Reserve Board that became effective in 2010 prohibit a bank from charging the overdraft fee unless the consumer has opted-in. For check and online bill payments, as well as recurring debits, banks can charge an overdraft fee without any affirmative request from the consumer.
$30-$35
According to various industry sources, the average overdraft fee ranged from $30-$35 in 2011 and has increased by 17 percent over the past five years. A study by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation published in 2008 found that consumers who overdrew 20 or more times per year paid an average of $1,610 in overdraft fees annually.
The inquiry the CFPB is launching today will provide insight into overdraft practices. The inquiry is focused on four main areas:
- Transaction Re-ordering that Increases Consumer Costs: The CFPB is concerned that overdraft practices employed by some financial institutions increase consumer costs. One such practice is commingling of all checks, bill payments, debit card transactions, and ATM withdrawals each day and processing the largest transactions first. This maximizes the number of transactions that will trigger an overdraft fee. The CFPB will examine how prevalent this practice is and how it impacts consumers.
- Missing or Confusing Information: The CFPB is exploring whether consumers can anticipate and avoid overdraft fees. The CFPB will examine how clearly overdraft terms are disclosed and the extent to which consumers are made aware of, qualify for, and take advantage of, alternative means of covering overdraft transactions.
- Misleading Marketing Materials: The Bureau is looking into reports that consumers are receiving misleading marketing materials about overdrafts. Initial data suggests that opt-in rates differ widely among institutions. The CFPB seeks to understand how differences in the way institutions explain and promote overdraft programs may affect opt-in rates.
- Disproportionate Impact on Low-Income and Young Consumers: The Bureau is revisiting the 2008 FDIC study that found that 9 percent of checking account customers bear about 84 percent of overdraft fees. Evidence suggests that overdraft programs disproportionately impact low-income and young consumers. According to this study, 46.4 percent of young adult accountholders incurred overdraft fees, and of those, 15 percent recorded more than ten overdrafts in one year.
To submit comments to CFPB on the overdraft inquiry, visit the CFPB's website.
James Stein (Sun, 26 Feb 2012 16:48:24 +0000): There is a difference between overdraft protection on check and bill payments and the one on card transactions. A missed bill payment can do real damages, such as a penalty or some other adverse action. On the other hand, a declined card transaction would only prompt the cardholder to use another card or cash for payment. The point is that, if only one of these protections would have to be made optional, that should be the one on card transactions, which is in fact the case.
Still, I don't think that banks should force their overdraft protection on check and online bill transactions on us, but the right thing should be to let consumers decide whether to opt into it or not. However, if you do opt in, you should be prepared to pay for it, because an overdraft is, after all, spending someone else's money and that has never been free. For a closer analysis: http://blog.unibulmerchantservices.com/the-cfpb-penalty-boxes-highlighting-and-the-issue-with-overdraft-fees.
Peggy Shape (Sun, 26 Feb 2012 22:45:16 +0000): They also charge the fee for just a "memo" transaction as well because I have had this situation where its merely a memo and not yet processed, they still consider it in an overdraft state and for me those "memo items" were actually being disputed and to be dropped or credited back or not even processed yet I so far have 2 overdraft fees because of them and they are not even processed into my account and hopefully won't be if the retailer does what they are suppose to.