So, do you think the next president will feel a great debt to Americans who are struggling with high unemployment, a housing crisis and soaring healthcare costs?
After all, whoever wins will have spent two years or more criss-crossing the country, meeting with Americans from all walks of life, hearing their stories, kissing their babies and tearing up at their hard-luck stories.
And even though the candidates themselves are much too busy to read the latest report showing nearly half of all American families are just one one crisis away from poverty, no doubt their aides will read it for them and urge them to do the right thing.
Right?
Don't count on it, says Common Cause, which notes that whoever wins the election will take office deeply in debt to a relative handful of wealthy Americans and special interest donors.
“We don’t know who will win in November, but the latest round of campaign finance reports shows ‘we the people’ are already running far behind ‘we the 1 percent,’” said Bob Edgar, president and CEO of the non-profit government watchdog group.
“The huge sums flowing into the presidential race from a few, deep-pocketed donors will give us a President and Congress more beholden than ever to big corporations and individuals already at the top of the economic ladder, and with little incentive to watch out for the rest of us," Edgar said.
“Every investor, and particularly those willing to make six- and seven-figure donations, expects a return on his or her money,” Edgar said. “And experience should tell us that those who owe their offices to big money investors will provide it.
The Supreme Court said in Citizens United that our elected officials can’t be corrupted by donors with whom they’re unconnected, and so we have nothing to fear from unlimited political spending by independent groups, Edgar said.
“But does anyone seriously believe that a President can be truly independent of people who’ve spent tens and even hundreds of millions of dollars to promote him or tear down his adversaries? We’ve had some admirable, even heroic Presidents, but none with that kind of super-power.”
Common Cause is a non-profit consumer organization that has long pressed for public funding of elections to reduce the influence of wealthy individuals and corporate interests.
David Webb (Fri, 03 Feb 2012 05:24:48 +0000): Elections have always been influenced by wealthy families. It is simply more visible now than in the past. These wealthy patrons often compete against one another in control of our elected officials.
Look at who we have in Congress right now. How many are wealthy? How many come from poor backgrounds? How many have law degrees?
How many have a middle class background? How many have a trade like air conditioning repair or plumbing? Or electrician?
My only point is we get what we pay for. The economic jungle favors people with money in politics. And it should favor successful people over people that have failed in economic life. I want people with a positive, well educated background making the rules.
What I do not want is a class of people that did not earn that money in real life. I do not want a form of Royalty like was in Europe for hundreds of years. We need people with talent, education, and training in what it is like to make a living like the rest of us. We need people that have had to live by the rules others have set up. We need people driven to change the rules to make life better for all of us, whether we are rich or middle of the road or poor.
Lydia Pol (Fri, 03 Feb 2012 06:15:30 +0000): RON PAUL the only true common sense choice!
Dean Davidson (Fri, 03 Feb 2012 13:12:21 +0000): What's new?
Lisa See (Mon, 06 Feb 2012 17:48:22 +0000): I wonder if NPR would be interested in reporting this and sharing the Common Cause? I doubt it.
Eleanore Gigandet (Tue, 07 Feb 2012 03:16:31 +0000): I'm inclined to believe that Lydia Pol is right...