1. Skip to navigation
  2. Skip to content
  3. Skip to sidebar

Consumer Affairs

States Join Fight Against Robocalls to Cell Phones

Congress may weaken consumer protections


PhotoThe National Association of Attorneys General (NAAG) has sent a letter signed by 54 state and territorial Attorneys General urging Congress to reject a bill that would allow robocalls to cell phones.

The Mobile Informational Call Act of 2011 would amend the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) and allow debt collectors and other businesses to robocall consumers on their cell phones. Additionally, H.R. 3035 would preempt state laws regulating junk faxes, unsolicited text messages, Do Not Call registries, and automated calls.

“Our offices protect consumers by enforcing the TCPA and state laws concerning telephone solicitations, automated calls, junk faxes and text messages," the attorneys general wrote. "Over at least the last 22 years, Congress and the states have enacted strong laws to protect consumers from unwanted and intrusive robocalls.

"Currently, federal law bans robocalls to cell phones unless the consumer gives prior express consent. H.R. 3035 would change the law and undermine federal and state efforts to shield consumers from a flood of solicitation, marketing, debt collection and other unwanted calls and texts to their cell phones.”

Harmful implications

The letter further describes the harmful implications the legislation will have on consumers.

One concern is that H.R. 3035 would shift the cost of unwanted calls – such as debt collection and marketing calls – to consumers, placing a greater burden on low-income consumers who cannot afford to pay. H.R. 3035 would also cause an increase in robocalls to cell phones from businesses and charities.

The Attorneys General propose instead that Congress “make two small but significant changes to the TCPA to better protect consumers:

  • protect consumers’ privacy by clarifying that prior express consent to robocalls must be obtained in writing; and
  • eliminate any suggestion from the TCPA that state statutes regulating interstate telephone and fax harassment are preempted.”

Share your Comments

Please enable javascript to comment on this page
Earl Mellor (Thu, 08 Dec 2011 22:58:25 +0000): I put junk callers on my "Avoid Doing Business With" list.
Judy Landon (Fri, 09 Dec 2011 04:37:57 +0000): I have a friend who lives with me and has debt collectors calling my landline all the time for a debt from over 10 years ago. If that isn't bad enough, now these collectors are calling my cell phone, under my name, only. I have a prepaid phone, and the calls and texts from these collectors are eating up my money. Surely, this must be illegal, but what can I do? I am on the do-not-call list which is being ignored, because these collectors figure Congress will give them the nod.
Stephen Colvin (Fri, 09 Dec 2011 10:24:36 +0000): Who the hell in congress that represents us put this robo call bill in, he needs to been shamed and voted out. It goes to show how much these big companies are padding the wallets of our congress!
Jannette Lyon (Fri, 09 Dec 2011 18:07:35 +0000): The Mobile Informational Call Act of 2011 would amend the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) and allow debt collectors and other businesses to robocall consumers on their cell phones. Additionally, H.R. 3035 would preempt state laws regulating junk faxes, unsolicited text messages, Do Not Call registries, and automated calls.
Shaun Dakin (Fri, 09 Dec 2011 19:48:23 +0000): Great news! How about sending your own robocall to these guys! Here you can http://www.reverserobocall.com/products/hr-3035-coalition.
J Scott Douglas (Mon, 12 Dec 2011 02:46:39 +0000): Just another example of congress proving that they work for big business rather than representing the people.
J Scott Douglas (Mon, 12 Dec 2011 02:48:06 +0000): it is nice to see that the AGs care about us...
Susan Elizabeth Spann (Tue, 27 Dec 2011 15:23:14 +0000): Do Not Call list already does not protect consumers from spoofed numbers violating it. So what's the difference?
Catherine Darsey (Tue, 27 Dec 2011 15:56:45 +0000): I can't tell you how many times I've re-registered my numbers on this list and still get spam calls.
Catherine Darsey (Tue, 27 Dec 2011 15:58:40 +0000): Not to mention the calls I get from debt collectors looking for the guy who had the number before me.
Quantcast