1. Skip to navigation
  2. Skip to content
  3. Skip to sidebar

Consumer Affairs

Justice Department 'Ready and Eager' to Go After AT&T

Attorney General Holder dashes talk of AT&T/T-Mobile settlement


PhotoThink the fix is in on the $39 billion AT&T/T-Mobile merger?  Think again. Attorney General Eric Holder says his antitrust litigators are "ready and eager" to fight the case in court.

The Justice Department filed suit to block the deal in August, claiming the proposed merger would be anticompetitive.  It would reduce the number of national cell phone companies from four to two and Holder says it would raise prices for consumers.

"The combination of AT&T and T-Mobile would result in tens of millions of consumers all across the United States facing higher prices, fewer choices and lower quality products for mobile wireless services,” said Deputy Attorney General James M. Cole said when the suit was filed.  

“Consumers across the country, including those in rural areas and those with lower incomes, benefit from competition among the nation’s wireless carriers, particularly the four remaining national carriers. This lawsuit seeks to ensure that everyone can continue to receive the benefits of that competition.”

Lobbying campaign

AT&T has claimed the deal would help consumers, saying it would speed the deployment of high-speed Internet access nationwide by making more spectrum space available to AT&T.

The company has unleashed a ferocious lobbying campaign aimed at persuading Congress and the Obama Administration that the deal is a win for consumers.

It has also recruited non-profits and even consumer groups to weigh in on its behalf.  Critics say it has done so through the skillful application of funds rather than a compelling argument.

But the effort has so far had no visible impact on the government's stance. Holder appeared at a Senate hearing today and said his department is  ready for action.  

"There is a trial team that is in place and they are ready and eager to go to court,'' he said.

Consumers' view

Besides its lobbying efforts, AT&T has launched an advertising barrage aimed at winning the hearts and minds of consumers but so far with little notable effect.

“Ask the T-Mobile users. We all know what saved AT&T. Apple did! That's how come they can throw all that money around. Less competition is not the American way,” a consumer named Dave said in a recent ConsumerAffairs.com posting.

“This could raise cell phone rates for everyone, not just T-Mobile users,” another poster, Daniel, said. “Less compition means higher prices, its basic economics. Let's band together and stop this, everyone speak out.”

Another poster, Craig, chimed in with “AT&T + T-Mobile = better reception? Oh, that's a good one.”


Share your Comments

Please enable javascript to comment on this page
Dave Tucker (Tue, 08 Nov 2011 22:33:09 +0000): Dave is right! lol......
Frank Houdek (Tue, 08 Nov 2011 22:33:43 +0000): AT&T just wants to gobble up another low cost carrier. This will stifle competition with no consideration of the public's best interest. I hope the Justice Department lawsuit stops this corporate greed.
Boris Sankisov (Tue, 08 Nov 2011 22:55:16 +0000): As long as SPRINT is there as a service provider and continues to have unlimited data plans consumers will benefit. ATT on the other hand will loose customers and profits will shrink.
Angie Collins (Tue, 08 Nov 2011 23:23:02 +0000): I could care less if I occassionally have a reception problem as long as my bill stays at 29.99 a month. Yes, that is the real price people. Not with an additional 50 bucks worth of taxes and fees added to it before the bill hits your mailbox.
Amanda Caldwell (Wed, 09 Nov 2011 03:04:36 +0000): I hate AT&T, they're rapists
Lynn Elzea (Tue, 08 Nov 2011 23:23:56 +0000): the reason I went with T-Mobile was because they were NOT AT&T.
Faye-Linda Quimby McGovern (Wed, 09 Nov 2011 00:01:13 +0000): another company I hope fails because of its greed. Only consumers will pay.
Robin Byers (Wed, 09 Nov 2011 01:52:22 +0000): Well go get 'em DOJ.
Romaine Williams (Wed, 09 Nov 2011 03:03:45 +0000): I'm happy that AT&T is going to be taken down, another greedy company being challenged.
Romaine Williams (Wed, 09 Nov 2011 03:04:50 +0000): And Dave, I love your comment, because you happen to be right.
Klara Reid (Wed, 09 Nov 2011 12:29:26 +0000): I am glad to see AT&T brought down a notch. Their claim to help consumers is a pile of hog wash. When my wireless service continued to decline in my rural area Danin Dahos from the "office of the ATT President" stated he couldn't assure me there would be any improvement. It was suggested I choose another carrier, so I did. I took 5 cell phones and shut down my land line. I wanted absolutely nothing to do with AT&T any more.
Quantcast