1. Skip to navigation
  2. Skip to content
  3. Skip to sidebar

Consumer Affairs

Feds Conduct Undercover Probe of For-Profit Colleges

Investigators created 12 phony "students" to measure schools' performance


PhotoThe Government Accountability Office went undercover to take a look at what really goes on at privately-owned, for-profit colleges.  What it found wasn't so good.

The agency selected 15 schools and successfully infiltrated 12 of them, using bogus high school records to gain admission. The 12 "students" enrolled in 31 courses at an average cost of $1,287 each, and 10 of them managed to collect federal student financial aid.

The "students" purposefully submitted substandard work; one received a passing grade by submitting photos of celebrities and political figures in lieu of responses to essay questions. Three students were expelled for poor work or nonattendance.

Eight of the nine students withdrew without incident at the end of the investigation.  At the ninth school, GAO's request to withdraw was never acknowledged and the student was eventually expelled for nonattendance.

No exit counseling

Three students did not receive federally mandated exit counseling, where students are supposed to be advised of loan repayment options and the consequences of default.

That's what happened to Rosa of St. Augustine, Fla. 

"I was going to the University of Phoenix online. I had to withdraw due to going through a divorce ... I did not know at the time that unlike the community college, when I withdrew that even though I paid with financial aid, I'd have to repay that and my transcripts would be held," she told ConsumerAffairs.com in a complaint earlier today. "No one warned me of this when I told them I was thinking of withdrawing."

Congress and consumer organizations have been casting a wary eye at for-profit schools recently, noting that enrollment in such schools has grown far faster than in traditional higher-education institutions.  

GAO conducted its investigation at the request of Sen. Tom Harkin (D-Iowa), chairman of the Senate's Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee, who has been highly critical of for-profit schools, noting that -- among their other drawbacks -- for-profit schools are far more expensive than comparable programs at community colleges or public universities. The average tuition for a for-profit school is about six times higher than a community college and twice as high as a 4-year public school.

Taxpayer dollars

Students enrolling in subpar for-profit schools are not only putting their own time and money at risk, they are also burning through huge amounts of taxpayer dollars.  During the 2009-2010 school year, for-profit colleges got almost $32 billion in grants and loans provided to students under federal student aid programs.

Close to one in four students who attends a for-profit school defaults on his or her federal student loans within 3 years of leaving school, Harkin's office said. This high rate of default combined with the fact that nearly all students at for-profit schools must borrow money to pay the cost of tuition, has resulted in a sector that enrolls approximately 10 percent of American higher education students but accounts for nearly 50 percent of all student loan defaults.

In many cases, students -- like Shelly of Helena, Mont. -- say they were not properly advised before taking out student loans to attend for-profit schools. 

"I attended Mountain State University online first, with FASFA loans and had no problem, actually got money back from them a couple of times. I then went to Kaplan online for one term," Shell said. "I have only been using FASFA to finance as I have no money that is why I had loans. Kaplan says I owe them money but will not explain why."

"I repeatedly told them that I had the loans and they had always covered it. I have asked them to explain why but got no response. Now I am back at Mountain State and have had no problems," Shelly said. "However, Kaplan will now not let the FASFA money go the Mountain State. It's because they will not let me register for the next term due to a 'balance' owing."

Not worth much

Even students who successfully complete their studies often find their degree or certificate doesn't do them much to help their job search.

"Got my degree from Phoenix University; I have a Masters on Business Administration focus on HR," said Claudia of Houston. "I have a student loan that is about $45,000."

But Claudia said her degree isn't accepted by many potential employers.

"They see this school as a for-profit and they do not want to deal with students from this place; resumes are set aside. Is there anything that I could do? I am having to pay for something that did not embrace any rewards to my career."


Share your Comments

Please enable javascript to comment on this page
Shannon Morin Croteau (Wed, 23 Nov 2011 21:14:18 +0000): This is an excellent article and right on target. I have been fighting Kaplan University for almost 2+ years and have a petition of over 50,000 signatures of people in the same boat. Please see my petition and sign it if you agree: http://www.change.org/petitions/tell-kaplan-washington-post-stop-cashing-in-on-low-income-students#Signatures Please leave me a message there if you would like and I will be glad to answer you. THANK YOU for this story......
Renita D Hamilton (Sun, 27 Nov 2011 22:12:15 +0000): The page has been removed
Larry Knauff (Thu, 24 Nov 2011 04:12:42 +0000): One can often get the same education at community colleges for less money. Schools like Phoenix, ITT, DeVry are mostly into "education" for the money and many employers don't honor their "degrees".
Rose Charles (Fri, 25 Nov 2011 06:30:13 +0000): University of Phoenix is one of the three schools that did not allow admission because of improper admission information. I enjoyed my experiences there.
Fred Sayin (Sat, 26 Nov 2011 00:03:15 +0000): I've tried working on a Master's in Psychology at University of the Rockes in CO- this college and Ashworth University both owned by Bridgeport Education- I read on a Website that the University of the Rockies were deceptful about their accredidation and a class action lawsuit against Bridgept Education in Jan. in San Diego CA. Also through the Web site I read- the Defense Dept has lost about 40 million dollars to these schools- education and employment. Have a website that shows the prices for 2 yr colleges, 4 yr colleges and for profit schools- median. To me it looks like I registered and took 6 courses at a worthless school-they can burn my transcipt for all I care. I've taken the college off my resume.
Mike Carlson (Sun, 27 Nov 2011 15:28:06 +0000): This is what happens when $$$$ are the focus & not knowledge.
Edwin Walker (Mon, 28 Nov 2011 02:21:45 +0000): I had to turn down employment applications for many students who attended private schools which were not accredited. Our company only recognizes accredited degrees. Many of the schools don't tell their students this, just take their money.
Serenity Adara (Wed, 30 Nov 2011 09:05:58 +0000): Individuals who attend schools that are affilated with religious orders also experience similiar problems. Since they are legally able to be accredited through different organizations than secular institutions, a degree from this type of school is sometimes looked down upon unfairly or viewed not as "legitimate" as a degree from even a state college. I have often thought of furthering my education with graduate studies but I can only afford a college/university that is considered a "religious" institution. If you have the brains and the ability to do the job as well as the requisite degrees/transcripts, that is all that should matter. Anything else should legally be considered discriminatory. The problem is how can you prove they did not hire you bc of where you obtained your degree - you only have your suspicions. It is VERY DIFFICULT to prove discrimination in the hiring process - which basically sucks. So I guess the 1% - who could afford to attend Harvard or Yale win again. It must be nice to be wealthy with a degree from an Ivy Leaque university. The US was founded on the premise that "all men" are created equal - with no "class distinctions" but we do indeed have very defined "class distinction" - it has become the HAVES & THE HAVE NOTS!
Quantcast