If banks are having a tough time in this economy, it stands to reason they wouldn't be turning away customers, right? After all, they produce advertisements trying to get new customers! So Amelia, of Laredo, Tex., was surprised when Chase Bank closed her checking and savings accounts with no explanation.
“There is a reason for everything and that's the least explanation I and every customer deserves,” Amelia told ConsumerAffairs.com. “What is their problem? They just can't leave you hanging there. I just use my account for little debit card expenses and have most of the time my balance over one hundred but less than one thousand. I really would for someone to tell me what's going on.”
If it makes Amelia feel any better, no one seems to know what's going on. Last month KING-TV in Seattle reported on a couple who had their Chase accounts closed in a situation almost exactly like Amelia's. The station reported it never did get an explanation. ConsumerAffairs.com has gotten reports from a few other consumers, who incidentally were former Washington Mutual customers acquired by Chase, who have had their accounts closed with no explanation. Two years ago, Chase also closed a large number of credit card accounts – almost all of them former Washington Mutual cardholders. Washington Mutual seems to be the common thread.
Cellular Shock
Oh my! Camille, a student from Portland, Ore., made her first trip abroad last month and had heard all about huge international cell phone roaming charges.
“I was not sure how my phone could be used so I contacted Verizon September 1, 2011 prior to leaving to learn what my options were,” Camille said. “The representative I spoke with asked me how my phone would be used and I explained I was traveling alone and may need the phone to search things on google, check email, and make a limited number of phone calls and text messages. I was told all that was needed for that type of usage was an additional $30 international data roaming and an upgrade to $4.99 for international calling so that my per minute rate would decrease. I accepted the plan.”
Camille said she arrived in Paris September 7. The following day, she said she received a text message from Verizon saying her data usage had exceeded $7,000! Seven-thousand dollars in one day.
“I immediately called Verizon Global customer service and was told how to shut off data roaming and that they did not understand what had happened and that there must be an error,” Camille said.
Pretty big error. Unfortunately, Camille says nothing has been done about the error. Hopefully, Camille can straighten this out because she purchased a roaming plan for the trip, accepting the plan suggested by the Verizon customer service rep. But getting someone at Verizon to own up to this may not be easy. She might try going the PR route, contacting Verizon Wireless corporate communications at 908-559-7512 and politely ask for help before she goes public with her problem.
Another perspective
We get a lot of complaints about the Your Baby Can Read package, most of them about the company, not the product. But to those who find the product doesn't work, Tiffany, of Atlanta, Ga., has tried it and has some advice.
“My mother-in law purchased the Your Baby Can Read package for my son last year, and at the time he was almost 12 months and he showed interest in the DVDs,” Tiffany told ConsumerAffairs.com. “He especially liked the sing along songs. We would all get excited when my son would say a word and when he would watch it by himself my husband I would peek in on him while he would say the words. I think it depends on the child and their attention span. Every child is different. What works for one child may not work for another. Make sure you are showing the video as well as reviewing the cards and books with your child and be patient with your child.”
Sounds like good advice.
Emma Hartnell-Baker (Wed, 12 Oct 2011 23:35:43 +0000): No, its not good advice. Far from it. You should not be encouraging parents to put their baby infront of the tv. Of course he will like the songs- so sing to him. Interact with him. TV should be used rarely at this age.
Babies cannot read. Its a fact- and why there are so many complaints about this product. Ive actually written an article about why, and what parents can do to teach their child to read, write and spell before they start school - for FREE. This program is based on a gimmick- many very young children can memorise whole words (flashcards) based on their length and shape. However this is NOT reading. They could do the same with chinese symbols. Its memory. They would however get stuck when words have a similar length and shape- eg 'horse' and house'. This program is not only ineffective but gives parents the wrong message about what reading and spelling actually is. Around 20 - 30% of our child population will have difficulties with auditory discrimination - phonemic awareness. This program includes NOTHING to develop an awareness of our alphabetic code. It can make the situation far worse for that group of children. Some children (around 5%) will find reading easy whatever we do with them. If you are sure your child is going to be in that category (and its not related ro intelligence) then buy this product if you must. But for the other 95% or so it can actally do more harm than good. Instead I advise parents to learn how to teach ALL children to read and spell. They can do it without a program- at home themselves, for free. Our goal at 'Read Australia' is to help every child read and spell as early as they can- this gives increased self-confidence and enables them to actually learn more in other subjects. So if any parent wants their child actually read and spell (words that they haven't memorised) then just learn out how to do this for FREE. There is well over a decade of research about it- and the 'method' that this program is based on has been discredited for over a decade. Read any government report to see what IS recommended- because it works for ALL children. Our target it to get all children reading and spelling with confidence by 6. Don't make this more difficult for us by buying things that go against what we know children need. If you want to make this man- with no qualifications in literacy and who has NEVER taught a class of children to read by 6 - or taught a toddler to read (let alone a baby) rich then just send him a cheque and don't potentially confuse your child.
I am appalled that a consumer affairs site would post this - as if the program could work? NO BABY CAN READ. It is not developmentally possible. At best this program could call itself 'Your toddler can learn to memorise word shapes'. That is NOT reading. The name of the product is misleading and inaccurate. I cannot understand how they can continue to call it that. If there was a product- Your Baby Can Be an Olympic Runner it would be closed down as its not possible. So speak to reading scientists about 'babies reading' if you don't see how ludicrous this product name is as well. And parent buy into it. They should be protected. It is not the company I object to as a reading specialist- but the PRODUCT. And here comsumer affairs are again publically posting somthing to support it? Madness.
Emma Hartnell-Baker BEd Hons. MA Special Educational Needs.
Director- Read Australia.
Camille Walker (Mon, 17 Oct 2011 16:35:45 +0000): To update. Thursday I received a call from Jesse in Executive Account Services, Verizon. He told me that over $7,500 of my $8,093 bill for the month of September stemmed from data usage in France for one day. He said there was no error and no fault on Verizon's part and offered a %35 credit on the bill. I still find $5,200 incredibly excessive and did not accept the offer. For me the bottom line is this, I called Verizon having never traveled outside of the US and asked what to do. I accepted the plan that was offered and was never advised to disable data roaming to avoid fees as high as $7000 (a warning fees could reach $500 would've been enough to keep my phone at home). This was an avoidable accident and Verizon needs to make a reasonable offer rather than exercise corporate greed.
Nicole Renee Delepine (Mon, 17 Oct 2011 17:21:31 +0000): Omg... I cant even believe what i just read. That's absolutly criminal, shame on verizon!
Stormy Brady (Mon, 17 Oct 2011 18:47:23 +0000): F word.
Damien Curry (Tue, 18 Oct 2011 03:47:20 +0000): Wowowwww
Kate Rohloff (Wed, 19 Oct 2011 18:34:11 +0000): That is absolutely insane! I'm an AT&T customer and I spent six and a half weeks in Europe in 2008 and two months in Europe in 2009. I used my phone continuously to text, check Facebook, post pictures to Facebook, check email, use Maps, etc (and yes, even call home) and my final bills weren't even half what Verizon's charging you for one day. There's just no way that there wasn't some mistake on their end. Perhaps a letter to Verizon from a lawyer would make them more willing to make a significant deduction in your bill?