For reasons that are a little hard to understand, it's been fashionable for TV's talking heads and the dead-tree columnists to denigrate the Occupy Wall Street protests, jeering at the protesters for not having a hierarchical top-down structure like, oh, say, CNN and lacking a knowledgeable staff of lobbyists, log-rollers and influence peddlers.
Politicians of all stripes have generally run the other way, giving the Occupy Wall Street movement, which is rapidly spreading worldwide, about as much face time as they initially gave the Tea Party, which some would say is the Occupy Wall Street movement seen from a different socio-economic perspective.
There's really only one thing you can say about the Occupy Wall Street movement: it is striking a chord with consumers (i.e., voters and taxpayers).
The latest evidence is a Quinnipiac University poll that found New Yorkers back the movement by a ratio of nearly 3-to-1.
Agreeing with the protesters views are Democrats 81-11 percent and independent voters 58-30 percent, while Republicans disagree 58-35 percent, the pollsters found.
A free country
"It's a free country. Let them keep on protesting as long as they obey the law, New Yorkers say overwhelmingly," said Maurice Carroll, director of the Quinnipiac University Polling Institute. "Critics complain that no one can figure out what the protesters are protesting. But seven out of 10 New Yorkers say they understand and most agree with the anti-Wall Street views of the protesters.
Not wanting to take the Quinnipiac poll's word for it, ConsumerAffairs.com conducted a computerized sentiment analysis of about 3.5 million comments about Wall Street on Twitter, Facebook and other social media and blogs over the last year.
We found public sentiment lukewarm, at best, hovering in the 20% positive range for most of the year before plunging to zero in August, where it remains today.
Both positive and negative comments erupted in September, going from about 8,000 comments monthly to more than 50,000 as the protests got underway. Though the volume of comments exploded, the ratio of positive-to-negative remained about evenly divided, as seen on this timeline:

How does this square with protesters' claims that they represent "the 99 percent," a reference to economist Joseph Stiglitz’s study showing the richest 1 percent of Americans control 40 percent of U.S. wealth?
Keeping in mind that a zero percent approval rating represents an even, 50-50 division of opinion, it may be that some of the 99 percent still have at least some sympathy for the wealth-burdened 1 percent, although Quinnipiac's Carroll said his polling found much stronger support for the protesters.
“Critics complain that no one can figure out what the protesters are protesting,” said Maurice Carroll, director of the Hamden, Connecticut-based poll. “But 7 out of 10 New Yorkers say they understand and most agree with the anti-Wall Street views of the protesters.”
Back to the world of social media for a minute. We scoured the last year looking for positive comments about Wall Street and came up with this:

While some of the comments are a little opaque, it's clear that at least a few consumers were discussing the movie "Wall Street," which they apparently liked a lot more than the industry that was its subject matter.
And what about dislikes? Here are the top 10 for the year:
Obviously, by a huge margin, many of those holding negative views blame Wall Street for crashing, destroying, ruining and crippling the economy. This is causing something of an identity crisis on the Street iself, whose denizens see themselves as being the grease that makes the economy go.
Quinnipiac surveyed 1,068 registered voters by phone Oct. 12-16. The results had a margin of error of plus or minus 3 percentage points.
David Lyle (Tue, 18 Oct 2011 02:50:55 +0000): Mil Gracias! Finally an objective report on the OWS protesters. The fact that more and more similar protests have sprung up all over the US and internationally is proof positive that masses of reasonable, discerning, responsible citizens are paying attention. It is exciting to see that so many progressives are becoming pro-active. We are NOT a “Tea-Party” Nation persuaded by the "spin" from radical right wing news sources. By the way, Rush Limbaugh flunked out in his freshman year of the same university where I received my Masters Degree. Apparently if you're a drug fiend, "sell-out", water carrier for the lies of insatiably greedy corporate elite, you can sell your soul, become filthy rich and become a certified member of the “Pigs at the Troth Club”. Hopefully, the protesters will persevere and continue to demand the reform needed to reverse this transformation of our Democracy from the current De facto, criminal Plutocracy of the top 1 %, by the top 1%, for the top 1%.
Keasha Hicks (Tue, 18 Oct 2011 11:50:37 +0000): interesting
Daryl White (Tue, 18 Oct 2011 14:11:11 +0000): Call it ink blot protesting...you see what you want to see. If a group protesting has no solutions, then they are only complaining and complaining isn't protesting.
Bruce Stacey Donaldson (Tue, 18 Oct 2011 14:12:25 +0000): Everybody wants MORE. Workers want more money, employers want more, Wall Street demands more profits, the Government demands more taxes...everything just keeps going up, up, up. Something has got to give. When will mankind be content with what they have? Why can't everyone be satisfied to make a living and not a killing?
Justin Ray (Tue, 18 Oct 2011 14:24:05 +0000): Some logic and insight, greed maybe? Some were not fortunate to be handed over a million dollar inheritance, or even have the opportunity to get an education to to some circumstance that left them alone to take care of their brothers and sisters. Disabled veterans that can no linger work and get the bare minimum, while these money hungry people share nothing and expect the world to keep turning round and round. I have seen poor people hand their last $10 to help a stranger get gas when they were on the side of the road, while that Mercedes drove on. It's about giving and helping more of those in need. I can say this because I am a disabled vet and I know what's its like to live poor after I got out and my country shit on me.
Sandra McDowell (Tue, 18 Oct 2011 14:53:21 +0000): Buyer beware: Gold jewelry bought at Wal-Mart has so little gold in it, you can't pawn it...I had bought a bracelet at Wal-Mart years ago. It broke and I was selling it with some other scrap gold at a pawn shop. It didn't even test for gold content! Guess it was so watered down... Material possessions are just trapping anyway... Just wanted to share.
'Jeanine Mercer' (Wed, 19 Oct 2011 02:04:47 +0000): For those of you who don't know why people are protesting all over the globe...people have no jobs, no homes and prices are steadily rising due to the stock market crash on Wall Street (or correction as it's told) and only the rich survive. The dollar is getting weaker, homes are not worth anything and people are turning to gold as assets (if they can afford it) and the banks are not giving out any money to people unless they have a 700 credit score. The banks own Wall Street and Wall Street (Government) will bail them out if they need money but won't bail out any individual who is down on their luck (unemployed). No one but Wall Street is making a living and a killing! 99% of the people are suffering and some won't even see it until they become homeless!
Edwin Jay Holmes (Wed, 19 Oct 2011 03:32:39 +0000): Wow!!!! My eyes are now open!!
Sandy Edelstein (Mon, 24 Oct 2011 07:56:29 +0000): Most of the wealth was accumulated illegally. HUGE bonuses, perks for the Wall Street suits, CEO's of companies, politicians - who's hands are everywhere. The poor workers slave away making $10 to $15 an hour - while the FAT cats are raking it in. Finally, the little guy is protesting.
Tina Hartley (Wed, 26 Oct 2011 12:21:14 +0000): Who planned the W.S. occupation and how much is it going to produce for the planners? Is it an Obama backing? Is it the closing of One World Order?