1. Skip to navigation
  2. Skip to content
  3. Skip to sidebar

Consumer Affairs

Michigan Court Narrows State's Medical Marijuana Law

Limit on number of plants that can be possessed upheld


PhotoThe Michigan Court of Appeals has issued a decision that further limits the state's medical marijuana law.

The justices ruled that a caregiver's decision to supervise the growth of 88 medical marijuana plants in a single facility on behalf of other registered caregivers and patients, other than his own, violates the Michigan Medical Marijuana Act (MMMA).

The case arose from Kent County, Mich., prosecutor William Forsyth's filing of drug charges against caregiver Ryan Bylsma. The decision will stand as precedent for all other lower court cases, according to Michigan Attorney General Bill Schuette, who praised the decision.

"This law is narrowly tailored to help those with serious debilitating illnesses, but criminals are exploiting it to construct massive grow operations," said Schuette. "I applaud the Court's decision in this case because it echoes the concerns of the public and law enforcement by protecting public safety. Limits on possession are not optional."

A three judge panel of the Michigan Court of Appeals held Bylsma can be charged with manufacturing marijuana because he possessed 88 plants in one growing facility, in violation of the 12 plant per patient limit enshrined in the MMMA.

The Court concluded that:

  • Caregivers may not possess plants grown for registered qualifying patients who are not officially connected to the caregiver through the State's registration process, or for other registered caregivers;
  • Caregivers who do not comply with the 12 plant per patient limit are not entitled to assert an affirmative defense in Court; and,
  • The State may file drug possession and manufacturing charges against registered patients and caregivers who do not adhere to the 12 plant per patient limit.

 

In June 2011, Schuette concluded in Attorney General Opinion 7259 that the MMMA does not permit the collective growing or sharing of marijuana plants between caregivers and unconnected patients or other caregivers. Schuette concluded the MMMA requires each patient's plants to be grown and maintained in a separate enclosed, locked facility that is only accessible to the registered patient or the patient's registered primary caregiver.

The law has been a source of concern to law enforcement since it was passed by the Michigan legislature. Schuett earlier this years announced plans to join with some members of the legislature to modify the statute.


Share your Comments

Please enable javascript to comment on this page
Nicholas Lester (Tue, 04 Oct 2011 15:16:51 +0000): They want to take away more rights of the people. Down with schuette!
Umedcenter MedicalMarihuana (Tue, 04 Oct 2011 21:27:24 +0000): Shuette is doing what he has to do to keep his brothers with badges working.Schuette was appeals court judge before being th A.G.. Its very clear folks its in thier best interests to keep marijuana users on the other side of the LAW, Meth addicts and labs you don't even hear abouT anymore because it cost them money, people that use marijuana for what ever reason, have money AND PAY THEIR FINES.,
Wayne Harris (Wed, 05 Oct 2011 03:22:44 +0000): Gestopo at it yet again! Vote them out!
Steve Anderson (Wed, 05 Oct 2011 23:40:51 +0000): When did the will of the people become less important than the will of a few fat cats in power who want to "protect" the american people. Marijuana doesn't ruin your life being caught with it does, does that make sense?
Michael David Binkowski (Thu, 06 Oct 2011 01:05:52 +0000): As Far as I'm Concerned THE PEOPLE ARE THE LAW & All Of These Politicians Should Be Thrown Or Recalled From Office-They Pass All Kinds of Laws that We Do NOT LIKE-But I Guess that is Ok For Them-But as For the People-I Guess We Do Not Count-It Is Time WE THE PEOPLE MAKE OUR VOICES HEARD! KICK THEM ALL OUT.
Chris Howe (Thu, 06 Oct 2011 16:59:11 +0000): I agree with Steve. lawmakers/polititions are supposed to "Represent" We the People, not their own beleifs or best interest.
Rich Arno (Thu, 06 Oct 2011 19:38:25 +0000): We need leadership who will represent US. It was US who passed the law, it should be US Schuette should be watching out for.
Robb Grandon (Thu, 06 Oct 2011 19:52:38 +0000): People shouldn't write articles unless they have all of tthe facts. The Michigan Legislature did not pass the Michigan Medical Marihuana Act. It was passed by the People Of Michigan by a 63% - 37% margin. Which anybody in politics know; that's a landslide victory. It is a Michigan Compiled Law in which the Legislature is now trying to change/irradicate against the will of the 63% that voted for it. It's funny how the Republicans always say...less government involvement....but here they are once again trying to change the voters intent. Sorry, but the people who wrote this law, didn't do it right. And now it is left for interpretation by a Right-leaning state government. I hope other States write it more clearly and definitive. How is a patient to get their medicine without dispensaries? Only through their "specific" caregiver? What if the caregiver is out of medication? So if CVS is my normal pharmacy and they are out of antibiotics, I can't go to Walgreen's to get it? Of course, I can. Why would medical marijuana be any different than any other legal medically accepted drug?
Melisa Brown (Fri, 07 Oct 2011 03:31:06 +0000): Three words, constitution, states rights.Look it up, they should.
Aaron Abramson (Sat, 08 Oct 2011 03:57:23 +0000): I just became a citizen of canada...i will be doing all medical marijuana business in canada and I urge all of you to do the same. its time to avoid this harassment of our rights.
Quantcast